Spreadsheet: 098e1f5d-0f10-4fbd-8f95-1603d0544f07
Sheet: Sheet1

Social Network Risk Assessment | Unnamed: 1 | Unnamed: 2 | Unnamed: 3 | Unnamed: 4 | Unnamed: 5 | Unnamed: 6 | Unnamed: 7
Social Networking Site: |  |  | EVALUATORS:
Weight: Indicates how important the criteria/feature is to the organization. Ranges from 1 to 5 (5 being the most important) |  |  |  |  | 5
Rating: Indicates how well the social networking site supports the Category.      0 = not supported, 1 = minimal support, 3=acceptable, 4 = above average, 5=outstanding
1.  Value - Opportunity to Support Business and Add Value to the County |  |  |  |  | Maximum Weight: |  | 0.1
Criteria | Criteria Description/Comments | Rate         (0-5) | Weight | Remarks | Score | Maximum Score | Weighted Score
Use by other Government Agencies | A social networking site that is successfully and heavily used by government agencies demonstrates public value. |  | 5 | Facebook has been adopted by a number of government agencies (see attached) but has not been adopted as frequently as [NAME]. | 0 | 25 | 0
Level of Adoption by Constituents or County Business Partners | Is the social networking site highly adopted by constituents or business partners the site will be developed for? |  | 2 | Facebook claims more than 400 million active users, with 50% logging in on any given day. | 0 | 10 | 0
 |  |  |  | Section 1. Score: | 0 | 35 | 0
 |  |  |  | Section 1. Overall Weight: |  |  | 0
2.  Limited Legal Risks - Rate the sites potential to reduce legal risks to the County |  |  |  |  | Maximum Weight: |  | 0.4
Criteria | Criteria Description/Comments | Rate         (0-5) | Weight | Remarks | Score | Maximum Weight | Weighted Score
Acceptable Terms of Use (Ownership, Change Process, etc.) | Is the social networking site's terms of use acceptable to the County? |  | 5 | Terms of Use allows creation of a government account and gives County ownership of content. Notice is provided of changes in Terms of Use with some opportunity for user input. | 0 | 25 | 0
Little to No Known Critical Litigation | Is there known litigation that could add legal risk to the County's use of the site? |  | 2 |  | 0 | 10 | 0
Ability to Display County SM Disclaimer | Ability to prominently display (or link to) County's Social Media Disclaimer |  | 5 | Disclaimer can be displayed using a Notes box directly on Wall page.  Ideally would be to hve capability to customize Tabs labels | 0 | 25 | 0
Records Management Capability | Ability to keep records of site use and published content |  | 3 | Can be setup using County e-mail account and to capture post, friend request, etc to that account | 0 | 15 | 0
Capability to Block Public Comment | Does the site have the ability to prevent public comments? |  | 3 | Facebook can be setup as one-way commution by not allow comments.  Flexibility exists to block comments by type (video, links, etc.) | 0 | 15 | 0
Capability to Moderate Public Comments | Will the County be able to moderate public comments? (before posting?) |  | 4 | Facebook does not provide capability to moderate comments prior to the public publishing, however, the County would be able to delete inappropriate comments when deemed necessary. | 0 | 20 | 0
 |  |  |  | Section 2. Score: | 0 | 110 | 0
 |  |  |  | Section 2. Overall Weight: |  |  | 0
3.  Limited Technical Risks - Rate the sites ability to protect the County and site users from technical risks |  |  |  |  | Maximum Weight: |  | 0.4
Criteria | Criteria Description/Comments | Rate         (0-5) | Weight | Remarks | Score | Maximum Weight | Weighted Score
Minimal Known Technical Risks/Issues | Are there known technical risks/issues that would/could negatively impact the County's use of the site? |  | 4 |  | 0 | 20 | 0
Capability to Use Official County e-Mail Account as Account Name - OR - Primary e-mail address | Site can use a County mail account as its login account and/or primary e-mail address so that all communication flows into a County system. |  | 2 |  | 0 | 10 | 0
Level of Monitoring Provided by Site Owner |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 15 | 0
Level of Customer Service by Site Owner |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 15 | 0
Capability of County to Monitor Site Use |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 15 | 0
Capability to Protect County Infrastructure |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 25 | 0
Site Has Sufficient Security Mechanisms |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 15 | 0
 |  |  |  | Section 3. Score: | 0 | 115 | 0
 |  |  |  | Section 3. Overall Weight: |  |  | 0
4.  Customization/Features - Ability to customize the site to look and behave like an official County site |  |  |  |  | Maximum Weight: |  | 0.1
Criteria | Criteria Description | Rate         (0-5) | Weight | Remarks | Score | Maximum Weight | Weighted Score
Ability to customize with County Seal, [NAME], Contact Info | Site offers customization features that will enable County Depts to give the site a County appearance |  | 3 |  | 0 | 15 | 0
[NAME] | Level that site meets section 508 ADA compliance |  | 2 |  | 0 | 10 | 0
 |  |  |  | Section 4. Score: | 0 | 25 | 0
 |  |  |  | Section 4. Overall Weight: |  |  | 0
OVERALL SCORE |  |  |  |  | 0 | 285 | 0
Overall Comments: