Spreadsheet: 6beb46c9-8a71-43f0-b29c-cd2ed9f1ed58
Sheet: 540.19a

 | Contract No. |  | Project Name |  |  |  | SPES #
 | Supplier |  |  |  |  | SPES Performance Period
 | Approvals:
 | Project Manager |  | Subcontract Administrator
 | Quality Engineer |  | Safety Representative
 | Construction Field Representative
 | Instructions: | Form 540.19a to be completed and submitted by [NAME] with each pay request Proc Form PROC-2123, Progress Invoice Request for Construction Subcontracts.  Each 540.19a will then be averaged and evaluated with the 540.19b to arrive at a final SPES score for the project.
 |  | Subcontractor is to evaluate its own performance by completing Part A answering Yes, No or Not Applicable (N/A) in column "Subcontractor's Self Performed Score".
 |  | Subcontractor is to list each Lower-Tier in Part B and evaluate each of its Lower-Tiers performance answering Yes, No or Not Applicable (N/A) in column "Subcontractor's Performed Evaluation of Lower-Tier".
 |  | BEA evaluates Subcontractor performance by completing Part A answering Yes, No or Not Applicable (N/A) in column "BEA Score".
 |  | BEA evaluates Subcontractor's Lower-Tiers performance by completing Part B answering Yes, No or Not Applicable (N/A) in column "BEA Evaluation of Lower-Tier Score".
 | Part A
 |  |  |  | Possible Points | Subcontractor's Self Performed Score | Subcontractor's Self Performed Points | BEA Score | BEA Awarded Points
 | Safety | To be Evaluated by Safety Representative |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Yes
 | 1 | Did the Subcontractor attend all required meetings |  | 10 |  |  |  |  |  |  | No
 | 2 | Did the Subcontractor submit manpower reports and training records in a timely manner |  | 10 |  |  |  |  |  |  | N/A
 | 3 | Did the [NAME] conduct prejob brief and weekly tool box meetings |  | 10
 | 4 | Does the Subcontractor maintain a clean and organized construction site |  | 10
 | 5 | Does the Subcontractor adhere to its safety plan |  | 10
 | 6 | Did the Subcontractor not receive any Category 1 Safety violations |  | 100
 | 7 | Did the Subcontractor not receive any Category 2 Safety violations |  | 50
 | 8 | Did the Subcontractor not receive any Category 3 Safety violations |  | 30
 | Technical Performance | To be Evaluated by Construction Management Represenative
 | Management of Work
 | 1 | Did the [NAME] plan and execute work effectively |  | 10
 | 2 | Did the Subcontractor develop an adequate and realistic schedule |  | 10
 | 3 | Did the Subcontractor submit a short range schedules on time throughout the performance period |  | 5
 | 4 | Did the Subcontractor provide an updated CPM schedule |  | 5
 | 5 | Does the Subcontractor understand and have the capability to use a CPM schedule |  | 10
 | 6 | Did the Subcontractor have adequate equipment and labor available |  | 15
 | 7 | Did the Subcontractor coordinate and schedule the appropriate lower-tiers to ensure work remains as scheduled |  | 15
 | Quality and cooperation of superintendents:
 | 1 | Is the superintendent open and easy to work with |  | 5
 | 2 | Does the superintendent makes sound decisions and display a high level of confidence |  | 15
 | 3 | Does the superintendent provide adequate prejob briefings |  | 5
 | 4 | Does the superintendent ensure workers are adequately trained per the contract |  | 5
 | 5 | Does the superintendent display adequate control of lower-tiers |  | 15
 | 6 | Does the superintendent display interest in lower-tiers work |  | 10
 | 7 | Does the superintendent display a strong safety culture |  | 10
 | 8 | Does the superintendent understand the contract specifications, drawings, special conditions, SRM, etc. |  | 10
 | 9 | Does the superintendent provide timely and adequate daily reports |  | 10
 | 10 | Is the superintendent cognizant of the need for BEA Quality Assurance inspections |  | 15
 | 11 | Is the superintendent cognizant of required vendor data submittal approvals prior to proceeding with applicable work |  | 15
 | 12 | Does the superintendent maintain red line drawings |  | 5
 | Workmanship - performed in a professional manner resulting in top quality goods and services
 | 1 | Are systems and components installed in a workmanship like manner |  | 25
 | 2 | Is care given to protect systems and components during the performance of the work |  | 10
 | 3 | Did the [NAME] prevent any equipment or material damage |  | 10
 | Home office support
 | 1 | Is the project manager or owner readily available when contacted |  | 5
 | 2 | Is the home office staff customer oriented |  | 5
 | 3 | Does the home office respond to poor SPES scores |  | 10
 | 4 | Does the home office respond to safety violations in a timely manner |  | 10
 | 5 | Does the home office provide timely and reasonable cost proposals |  | 15
 | 6 | Does the home office perform adequate case work during an employee medical emergency |  | 5
 | 7 | Are invoices submitted with the required supporting documentation |  | 10
 | 8 | Do invoices accurately reflect the schedule of values |  | 5
 | 9 | Are certified payrolls submitted on time and accurate |  | 5
 | 10 | Are CFP/C's clear and concise |  | 20
 | Assure compliance with technical requirements including codes & standards
 | 1 | Is the Subcontractor following the specifications and drawings |  | 15
 | 2 | Is the Subcontractor knowledgeable about the applicable codes & standards |  | 10
 | 3 | Has the [NAME] been proactive in ensuring codes are met |  | 5
 | 4 | Does the Subcontractor consistently install components that meet codes & standards |  | 10
 | 5 | Does the Subcontractor minimize rework |  | 10
 | Engineering capabilities and expertise applied as needed and with cooperation
 | 1 | Did the Subcontractor go above and beyond simply installing components and point out potential issues or problems with the design |  | 15
 | 2 | Did the Subcontractor provide a recommendation for design errors |  | 20
 | 3 | Did the Subcontractor recognize a better method for installing or utilizing a different system or component that could save the project time and money |  | 20
 | 4 | Are outage requests, isolations, and lockout/tagouts requested in timely manner? (no last minute)requests |  | 20
 | 5 | Is the work performed during the outage sufficient so that another outage in not required |  | 20
 | Quality Assurance/Inspections | To be Evaluated by Quality Representative
 | 1 | No deficancies were noted for equipment/material |  | 20
 | 2 | Did the Subcontractor provide timely notification for inspections |  | 15
 | 3 | Did the Subcontractor provide timely notification for testing |  | 15
 | 5 | Did the Subcontractor meet the requirements of RD-5005/5014 |  | 35
 | 6 | Did the Subcontractor meet the requirements of RD-5010 |  | 35
 | 7 | Were all inspections acceptable |  | 25
 | Vendor Data | To be Evaluated by Project Management Represenative
 | 1 | Did the Subcontractor submit vendor data submittals in a timely manner |  | 20
 | 2 | Did the Subcontractor submited vendor data meet the contract requirements |  | 15
 | 3 | Did the Subcontractor submit vendor data correctly |  | 20
 | Delivery/schedule | To be Evalutated by Supply Chain Representative
 | 1 | Is the Subcontractor projected to meet the contracted completion date |  | 100
 |  |  | Subcontractor Total
 | Comments:
 | Part B
 | Lower-Tier Evaluations:
 | Lower-Tier A |  |  | Possible Points | Subcontractor's Performed Evaluation of Lower-Tier | Subcontractor's Performed Score of Lower-Tier Points | BEA Evaluation of Lower-Tier | BEA Awarded Points
 | 1 | Did the Lower-Tier attend the prejob briefing every morning as required |  | 10
 | 2 | Does the Lower-Tier work well with other crafts |  | 10
 | 3 | Does the Lower-Tier display a strong safety culture |  | 10
 | 4 | Does the lower-tiers recognize the general contractor’s authority |  | 10
 | 5 | Is the Lower-Tier on schedule for their scope of work |  | 15
 | 6 | Are systems and components installed in a workmanship like manner |  | 10
 | 7 | Is care given to protect systems and components during the performance of the work |  | 10
 | 8 | Did the Lower-Tier submited vendor data meet the contract requirements |  | 15
 | 9 | Did the subcontractor prevent any equipment or material damage |  | 10
 |  |  | Lower-Tier A Total
 | Comments:
 | Lower-Tier B |  |  | Possible Points | Subcontractor's Performed Evaluation of Lower-Tier | Subcontractor's Performed Score of Lower-Tier Points | BEA Evaluation of Lower-Tier | BEA Awarded Points
 | 1 | Did the Lower-Tier attend the prejob briefing every morning as required |  | 10
 | 2 | Does the Lower-Tier work well with other crafts |  | 10
 | 3 | Does the Lower-Tier display a strong safety culture |  | 10
 | 4 | Does the lower-tiers recognize the general contractor’s authority |  | 10
 | 5 | Is the Lower-Tier on schedule for their scope of work |  | 15
 | 6 | Are systems and components installed in a workmanship like manner |  | 10
 | 7 | Is care given to protect systems and components during the performance of the work |  | 10
 | 8 | Did the Lower-Tier submited vendor data meet the contract requirements |  | 15
 | 9 | Did the subcontractor prevent any equipment or material damage |  | 10
 |  |  | Lower-Tier A Total
 | Comments:
 | Lower-Tier C |  |  | Possible Points | Subcontractor's Performed Evaluation of Lower-Tier | Subcontractor's Performed Score of Lower-Tier Points | BEA Evaluation of Lower-Tier | BEA Awarded Points
 | 1 | Did the Lower-Tier attend the prejob briefing every morning as required |  | 10
 | 2 | Does the Lower-Tier work well with other crafts |  | 10
 | 3 | Does the Lower-Tier display a strong safety culture |  | 10
 | 4 | Does the lower-tiers recognize the general contractor’s authority |  | 10
 | 5 | Is the Lower-Tier on schedule for their scope of work |  | 15
 | 6 | Are systems and components installed in a workmanship like manner |  | 10
 | 7 | Is care given to protect systems and components during the performance of the work |  | 10
 | 8 | Did the Lower-Tier submited vendor data meet the contract requirements |  | 15
 | 9 | Did the subcontractor prevent any equipment or material damage |  | 10
 |  |  | Lower-Tier A Total
 | Comments:
 | Lower-Tier D |  |  | Possible Points | Subcontractor's Performed Evaluation of Lower-Tier | Subcontractor's Performed Score of Lower-Tier Points | BEA Evaluation of Lower-Tier | BEA Awarded Points
 | 1 | Did the Lower-Tier attend the prejob briefing every morning as required |  | 10
 | 2 | Does the Lower-Tier work well with other crafts |  | 10
 | 3 | Does the Lower-Tier display a strong safety culture |  | 10
 | 4 | Does the lower-tiers recognize the general contractor’s authority |  | 10
 | 5 | Is the Lower-Tier on schedule for their scope of work |  | 15
 | 6 | Are systems and components installed in a workmanship like manner |  | 10
 | 7 | Is care given to protect systems and components during the performance of the work |  | 10
 | 8 | Did the Lower-Tier submited vendor data meet the contract requirements |  | 15
 | 9 | Did the subcontractor prevent any equipment or material damage |  | 10
 |  |  | Lower-Tier A Total
 | Comments:
 | Lower-Tier E |  |  | Possible Points | Subcontractor's Performed Evaluation of Lower-Tier | Subcontractor's Performed Score of Lower-Tier Points | BEA Evaluation of Lower-Tier | BEA Awarded Points
 | 1 | Did the Lower-Tier attend the prejob briefing every morning as required |  | 10
 | 2 | Does the Lower-Tier work well with other crafts |  | 10
 | 3 | Does the Lower-Tier display a strong safety culture |  | 10
 | 4 | Does the lower-tiers recognize the general contractor’s authority |  | 10
 | 5 | Is the Lower-Tier on schedule for their scope of work |  | 15
 | 6 | Are systems and components installed in a workmanship like manner |  | 10
 | 7 | Is care given to protect systems and components during the performance of the work |  | 10
 | 8 | Did the Lower-Tier submited vendor data meet the contract requirements |  | 15
 | 9 | Did the subcontractor prevent any equipment or material damage |  | 10
 |  |  | Lower-Tier A Total
 | Comments:
 | Lower-Tier F |  |  | Possible Points | Subcontractor's Performed Evaluation of Lower-Tier | Subcontractor's Performed Score of Lower-Tier Points | BEA Evaluation of Lower-Tier | BEA Awarded Points
 | 1 | Did the Lower-Tier attend the prejob briefing every morning as required |  | 10
 | 2 | Does the Lower-Tier work well with other crafts |  | 10
 | 3 | Does the Lower-Tier display a strong safety culture |  | 10
 | 4 | Does the lower-tiers recognize the general contractor’s authority |  | 10
 | 5 | Is the Lower-Tier on schedule for their scope of work |  | 15
 | 6 | Are systems and components installed in a workmanship like manner |  | 10
 | 7 | Is care given to protect systems and components during the performance of the work |  | 10
 | 8 | Did the Lower-Tier submited vendor data meet the contract requirements |  | 15
 | 9 | Did the subcontractor prevent any equipment or material damage |  | 10
 |  |  | Lower-Tier A Total
 | Comments: