Spreadsheet: 1aa1ed4d-302c-417d-82d9-58ce1f3fb033
Sheet: Sheet1

INDICATOR DESCRIPTIONS | Unnamed: 1 | Unnamed: 2 | Unnamed: 3 | Unnamed: 4 | Unnamed: 5 | Unnamed: 6 | Unnamed: 7 | Unnamed: 8 | Unnamed: 9 | Unnamed: 10 | Unnamed: 11 | Unnamed: 12 | Unnamed: 13 | Unnamed: 14 | Unnamed: 15 | Unnamed: 16 | Unnamed: 17 | Unnamed: 18 | Unnamed: 19 | Unnamed: 20 | Unnamed: 21 | Unnamed: 22
Indicator No. |  |  | Short Title (20):    [NAME] (60):
CROSS-REFERENCING INFORMATION
Central Govt Outcome:
National Indicator |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | CYPP: |  |  |  |  |  | 0
LAA 10/11: |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | CAA |  |  |  |  |  | 0
2026 Community Strategy: |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | Council Plan Measure 2010: |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Scorecard name:
RESPONSIBILITY
Lead Organisation:
Data Provider:
BCC Strategic Outcome:
BCC Sub Outcome:
[NAME]:
Other Portfolios (specify):
Lead Directorate:
Other Directorate (specify):
ACCOUNTABILITY
KPI Business Owner: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | KPI Technical Owner:
KPI Business Owner - Sub: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | KPI Techincal Owner - Sub:
Plan Team Representative:
LOCAL AREA DATA AVAILABILITY
Constit. |  | Ward |  | SOA |  | Other: |  | 0
TARGET INFORMATION
Target: |  |  |  |  |  | Target 2010/11: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Upper Tolerance:
Straight Line Target: |  |  |  |  |  | Cumulative(Y/N): |  |  |  |  |  |  | Lower Tolerance:
Quarterly Target: |  |  | 0 |  | [NAME]:
Q1 |  |  |  |  |  | Q2 |  |  |  |  | Q3 |  |  |  |  | Q4
HAS THIS OR A RELATED INDICATOR BEEN SUBJECT TO  AUDIT OR EXTERNAL VERFICATION WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS?
Description: |  |  |  |  | Y/N | Month |  |  | Year |  | Body
[NAME]: |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  | 0
Details: |  | 0
District Audit: |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  | 0
Details: |  | 0
National Verification: |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  | 0 |  |  | 0
Details:
Other Audit/Verification: |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  | 0 |  |  | 0
Details: |  | 0
Has this or any related indicator been subject to audit amendment or reservation in the last five years?
 |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  | 0 |  |  | 0
Details: |  | 0
Other relevant comments/information related to audit arrangements, including risks:
0
DATA COLLECTION AND CALCULATION
Report Frequency: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Time Granularity (availability):
[NAME] |  |  | :
Date of Availability:
Source System
National Source: |  |  |  |  | Data Collection: |  |  |  |  | Existing or New: |  |  |  |  | External or Internal:
Collection Process |  |  | E.g - end of year statutory returns (RAP Report), Survey (Place Survey) etc
Current Report format |  |  | E.g - Table in excel spreadsheet, self assessment return etc
Unit of Measure |  |  | E.g - Number, percentage, rate per 1,000 etc and where they are obtained
Proposed Calculation |  |  | E.g - Describe in detail how the measure is calculated, using which components from where:  [NAME], count of…. .  If the formula is too complex to reproduce in the space provided, please reference or attach the indicator definition document.
Data Capturing Issues |  |  | Issues |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Actions to resolve
OTHER COMMENTS OR RELEVANT INFORMATION
DECLARATION
I confirm that the details quoted above are an accurate representation of this National Indicator
KPI Business Owner
Signed: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Date:
KPI Technical Owner
Signed |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Date
Performance Lead Officer
Signed |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Date
DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT
Statement |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Yes |  | No
1 | This indicator has been calculated and reported in accordance with National Performance Indicator guidelines using correct common data sets.
2 | An identified senior manager is responsible for signing off PI data
3 | There is a clear, documented and agreed procedure in place for PI data collection and reporting.
4 | Source data provided by partners is formally signed off by their auditors or management team.
5 | All staff involved in data collection and reporting of this indicator have been provided with the necessary guidance to report this indicator, including:
a | Technical definitions and guidance
b | Target setting guidance
c | Data Quality guidance
d | Performance Plus training and guidance
e | Commentary guidance
f | Provisional Quarterly Reporting Timetables
6 | All staff involved in data collection and reporting of this indicator have been provided with the Birmingham City Council's Data Quality guidance
7 | All risks associated with PI data have been assessed and measures put in place to address the identified risks.
8 | The PI data collection system has appropriate controls in place to prevent erroneous data entry, missing data, and unauthorised changes.
9 | PI data is reported to the agreed reporting timetable and used to inform service planning.
10 | Reports on performance and the quality of the data collection system are brought, as appropriate, to the attention of elected members.
11 | Corrective action is taken when systems are found to be weak – with appropriate responses to audit findings.
12 | A robust system is in place to report this indicator correctly and a full audit trail is in place.
13 | The reliability of data transferred automatically from source systems has been checked
14 | Other Comments - please complete overleaf
IF YOU ANSWER NO TO STATEMENTS 1-13, PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER INFORMATION OVERLEAF |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Totals: |  | 0 |  | 0 |  | 0
DECLARATION
KPI Business Owner
Signed: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Date:
Plan Team Representative:
Signed |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Date
FURTHER INFORMATION - INCLUDING 'NO' ANSWERS OVERLEAF
1 | This indicator has been calculated and reported in accordance with National Performance Indicator guidelines
2 | An identified senior manager is responsible for signing off PI data
3 | There is a clear, documented and agreed procedure in place for PI data collection and reporting.
4 | Source data provided by partners is formally signed off by their auditors or management team.
5 | Staff involved in data collection / reporting have been provided with the necessary guidance
6 | Staff involved in data collection / reporting  have been provided with the BCC Data Quality guidance
7 | All risks associated with PI data have been assessed and measures put in place to address the identified risks.
8 | Appropriate controls are in place to prevent erroneous data entry, missing data, and unauthorised changes.
9 | PI data is reported to the agreed reporting timetable and used to inform service planning.
10 | Reports on the data collection system are brought to the attention of elected members.
11 | Corrective action is taken when systems are found to be weak – with appropriate responses to audit findings.
12 | A robust system is in place to report this indicator correctly and a full audit trail is in place.
13 | The reliability of data transferred automatically from source systems has been checked
14 | Other Comments: