Spreadsheet: c9bb82df-d5eb-4eb2-981d-dee6cbd6189b
Sheet: Sheet1

Article Name | Author | Experiment # | Date | Player Vs. Player | % Mutual Cooperation | % Solitary/Mixed Cooperation | #Trials | Free Choice | [NAME]? | Monetary Reward? | [NAME]? | Gender | Interaction? | College Attended | Note | ACT Scores | SAT Scores | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | 1966-67 entering freshman SAT and ACT Scores According to American Universities and Colleges, 10th Edition | 1970-71 entering freshman SAT and ACT Scores According to American Universities and Colleges, 11th Edition
Comparison of Sequential and [NAME], Matrix, and Strategy Variable in a Prisoner's [NAME] | Stuart Oskamp |  | 1974 | Yes | 0.59 |  | 60 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Women | No | Claremont McKenna College | Cooperation is average across payoffs (47% non-zer sum, 71% Positive payoff) | 31 | 1400 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 158 SAT: v= 90% above 50% above 500 and 10% above 700  SAT: m= 97% above 500 70% above 600 and 24% above 700 | Pg. 196 SAT: N/A ACT: N/A
Cooperation and the Cooperativeness of the Other Player | Warner Wilson |  | 25263 | Yes |  |  | 120 | Programmed | No | Yes | Yes | Men | Yes | University of Alabama | Semi-Programmed 1 partner, referred to as a "confederate,"  was grouped by personality traits of cooperation, competition, etc.  Tested: 1966 | 22 | 1188 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968
Distributive Justice and Collaboration in Non-Zero-Sum Games | [NAME] | II | 1964 | Yes | 0.3266666666666667 |  | 20 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Both | No | Western Michigan University | Mean Collaboration  Averaged across reward types | 22 | 1188 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 754 SAT: v=485, m=515 | Pg. 815 SAT: N/A ACT: 21.6
An Empirical Approach to the Prisoners' Dilemma Game | [NAME] | I | 1962 | Yes | 0.659 |  | 100 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |  | No | Reed College(Oregon) | Graphs only Test: 1960 | 30 | 1368 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 1249 SAT: v=675, m=655 | Pg. 1310 SAT: v=669, m=668
An Empirical Approach to the Prisoners' Dilemma Game | [NAME] | II | 1962 | Yes | 0.5665 |  | 100 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |  | No | MIT | Graphs only Test: 1961 | 32 | 1477 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 672 SAT: v=677, m=751 | Pg. 738 SAT: v=658, m=740
An Empirical Approach to the Prisoners' Dilemma Game | [NAME] | III | 1962 | Yes | 0.75 |  | 30 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |  | No | MIT | Graphs only Test: 1961 Trial: students didn't know when game would end | 32 | 1477 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 672 SAT: v=677, m=751 | Pg. 738 SAT: v=658, m=740
An Empirical Approach to the Prisoners' Dilemma Game | [NAME] | IV | 22860 | No |  | 0.9540000000000001 | 25 | Free | Yes | Yes | No |  | No | MIT | The cooperation levels appear in [NAME] only Test: 1961 $5 Trial: students didn't know when game would end Player Vs. Experimentor (matching) | 32 | 1477 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 |  | SAT: v=658, m=740
Expecting Continued Play in Prisoner's Dilemma Games: A Test of Several Models | [NAME]; [NAME] |  | 30468 | No | 0.2485 |  | random(1-38) | No, see note | Yes | Yes | No |  | No | University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign | Cooperation is averaged given games where trials exceded 4 Programmed  50% Matching, 50% Unforgiving by opponent | 28 | 1285 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968
Factors Affecting Cooperation in a Prisoner's [NAME] | [NAME]; [NAME] | II | 1965 | Yes | 0.8 |  | 30 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Both | No | [NAME] |  | 32 | 1460 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | [NAME]:  Pg. 160 SAT: v=670, m=675 | Pg. 199 SAT: [NAME], m=631
Factors Affecting Cooperation in a Prisoner's [NAME] | [NAME]; [NAME] | III | 1965 | Yes | 0.58 |  | 30 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Women | No | Pomona College & UCLA |  | 32 and 24, respectively | 1460 and 1347, respectively | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | [NAME]:  Pg. 160 SAT: v=670, m=675 UCLA: Pg. 214 SAT: N/A ACT: N/A | [NAME]:  Pg. 199 SAT: [NAME], m=631 UCLA: Pg. 248 SAT: v=555, m=585
[NAME] in the Prisoner's [NAME] | [NAME]; [NAME]; [NAME] | III (Series 3) | 1973 | Yes | 0.393 | 0.494 | 100 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Men | No | University of Michigan-Ann Arbor |  | 28.5 | 1320 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | P.745 SAT: v=578, m=621 | P.807 SAT: v=580, m=623
Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Experimental Evidence | [NAME]; [NAME] |  | 1993 | Yes | 0.34 |  | 200 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |  | No | University of Wisconsin- [NAME] | Graphs only: | 28 | 1260 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 1652 SAT: v=564, m=590 | Pg. 1730 SAT: v=566, m=572
Sex, Fear, and [NAME]: A Social Dilemma Analysis of Gender and Cooperation | [NAME] |  | 2003 | Yes | 0.49333 |  |  | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Both | No | University of South Carolina- Columbia | Cooperation % is averaged across games and sexes | 25 | 1166 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg.1392 SAT: v=482, m=513 | Pg.1465 SAT: v=481, m=512
Some Descriptive Aspects of Two-Person Non-Zero-Sum Games | [NAME]; J. Sayer Minas; [NAME]; [NAME] | I & II | 1959 | Yes | 0.5 |  | 50 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |  | No | Ohio State University-Columbus | Cooperation: median of 25 in 50 trials was used | 26 | 1197 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 1183 SAT: N/A ACT:22 | Pg. 1242 SAT: N/A ACT:22.2
Some Descriptive Aspects of Two-Person Non-Zero-Sum Games II | [NAME]; [NAME]; [NAME]; [NAME] |  | 1960 | Yes | 0.2314 | 0.14423 | 30 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Both | No | Ohio State University- Columbus | %cooperation averaged across 3 diffent matrices | 26 | 1197 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 1183 SAT: N/A ACT:22 | Pg. 1242 SAT: N/A ACT:22.2
An Experimental Study of "Cooperation" in Prisoner's [NAME] | [NAME] | I | 1965 | Yes | 0.66375 |  | 98 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Men | No | Institute for Research, State College, Pennsylvania | Graphs Only Average across each player %cooperation | 30 | 1400 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 1317 SAT: v=548, m=592 | Pg. 1380 SAT: v=551, m=594
An Experimental Study of "Cooperation" in Prisoner's [NAME] | [NAME] | II | 1965 | Yes | 0.3892857142857143 |  | 98 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Men | No | Institute for Research, State College, Pennsylvania | Graphs Only Average across each player %cooperation | 30 | 1400 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 1317 SAT: v=548, m=592 | Pg. 1380 SAT: v=551, m=594
Matrix Indices and Strategy Choices in Mixed-Motive Games | [NAME]; [NAME] |  | 1967 | Yes | 0.359 |  | 300 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Both | No | University of Miami | %cooperation arrived at by subtracting %defection from 1 Tested: 1965 | 27.5 | 1316 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 328 SAT: v=490, m=501 | P.370 SAT: v=476, m=504
Sex Role, Cooperation and Competition in a Two-Person Non-Zero-Sum Game | [NAME] |  | 1961 | Yes | 0.499166665 |  | 30 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Both | No | Ohio State University- Columbus | Hours as a research subject required %cooperation calculated by subtracting %defection across gender from 1 | 26 | 1197 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 1183 SAT: N/A ACT:22 | Pg. 1242 SAT: N/A ACT:22.2
Varying Patterns of Reward Cooperation: The Effects in a Prisoner's [NAME] | [NAME]: [NAME] |  | 27454 | Yes | 0.497 |  | 15 | Free |  | Yes | No |  | No | Universities of Stockholm and Gothenburg, Sweden | Outcome suggests students are driven more by bonus points than money | 0 | 0 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968
End Behavior in Sequences of Finite Prisoner's Dilemma Supergames | Reinhard Selten and [NAME] |  | 31199 | Yes | 0.4615384615384616 |  | 25 | Free | Yes | Yes | No |  | No | University of Bonn, Germany | Cooperation is given by a very confusing table, and averaged over 25 rounds | 0 | 0 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968
Cooperation in PD games: Fear, greed, and history of play | [NAME], ELINOR OSTROM, [NAME], [NAME], [NAME] |  | 1999 | Yes | 0.37 |  | 16 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |  | No | Indiana University- Bloomington |  | 24 | 1111 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 462 SAT: v=498, m=512 | Pg. 515 SAT: v=491, m=519
Reward Level and Game Playing Behavior | [NAME]; [NAME] |  | 24167 | Yes | 0.4282 |  | 100 | Free | Yes | Yes | No |  | No | University of Louvain, Belgium |  | 0 | 0 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968
War Hawks and Peace Doves: Alternative Resolutions of Experimantal Conflicts | [NAME], [NAME], A. Rapoport, and J. Winter |  | 1965 | Yes |  | 0.3525 | 55 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |  | Yes | University of Michigan- Ann Arbor | Interaction: Gestures were allowed | 28.5 | 1320 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | P.745 SAT: v=578, m=621 | P.807 SAT: v=580, m=623
The 16 PF as an Indicator of Performance in the Prisoner's [NAME] | [NAME]; [NAME] |  | 26177 | Yes | N/A Drat |  | 75 | Free | Yes | No | Yes | Both | No | University of New Brunswick and Saint Thomas University |  | 0 | 0 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968
Effect of Asymmetry in payoff on bhavior in a 2-person non-zero-sum game | [NAME], [NAME], and [NAME] |  | 1964 | No, random response experimenter- but were lead to believe PVP | 0.4475 |  | 80 | No, see note | Yes | No | Yes | Both | No | Kent State University |  | 21 | 1018 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968
The "End" and "Start" Effects in Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma | [NAME]; [NAME] |  | 1966 | Yes | 0.4932 |  | Varied but all > 300 | Yes | Yes | No | No | Both | No | University of Michigan- Ann Arbor |  | 28.5 | 1320 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | P.745 SAT: v=578, m=621 | P.807 SAT: v=580, m=623
Players, Persons, and Purposes: Situational Meaning and the Prisoner's [NAME] | [NAME], Jr., [NAME] |  | 1969 | Yes | 0.295 |  | 20 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Men | No | Stanford |  | 31.5 | 1455 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 201 SAT: v= 98% above 500, 74% above 600, 25% above 700 m= 97% above 500, 80% above 600, 37% above 700 | Pg. 236 SAT: N/A
Sex Roles in Games | [NAME] |  | 1973 | Yes | 0.3441 | 0.545 | 20 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Both | Yes | University of Illinois- Chicago |  | 23 | 1326.5 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 441 SAT: N/A ACT: 24 | Pg.494 SAT: N/A ACT: N/A
One-Play, Two-Play, Five-Play, and Ten-Play Runs of Prisoner's Dilemma | [NAME] |  | 1966 | Yes | 0.22 | 0.38 | 300 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Women | No | University of Michigan- Ann Arbor |  | 28.5 | 1320 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | P.745 SAT: v=578, m=621 | P.807 SAT: v=580, m=623
Equilibrium Behavior and Repeated Play of the Prisoner's Dilemma | [NAME] and [NAME] |  | 1977 | Yes | 0.2837465564738292 |  | Varied,  see note | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Both | No | University of Illinois- Urbana | Trials: Roulette wheel spun for game continuation probabilities (.895, .5, and .105) | 28 | 1285 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 438 SAT: N/A ACT: 26.41 | Same as University of Illinois- Chicago Pg. 491 SAT: N/A ACT: 22
Presentation format, other-person strategies, and cooperative behavior in the prisoner's dilemma | [NAME] and [NAME] |  | 24593 | Yes |  |  | 50 | Programmed |  | Yes | No | Not Specified | No | Kansas State College of Pittsburg |  |  |  | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968
The Effect of Incentive Magnitude and "Motivational Orientation" Upon Choice Behavior in a Two-Person Nonzer-sum Game | [NAME], [NAME], and [NAME] |  | 1968 | Yes | 0.497 |  | 100 | Yes | Yes | Both were used to isolate effects | No | Not Specified | No | Institute for Research, State College, Pennsylvania |  | 30 | 1400 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 1317 SAT: v=548, m=592 | Pg. 1380 SAT: v=551, m=594
Cooperative Behavior In A Mixed-Motive Game | [NAME] | I | 1962 | No, 40 & 60% Cooperative program- but were lead to believe PVP |  | 0.5555 | 60 | Yes | Yes | No | No | Not Specified | No | University of Toronto | I kept this article because Students had highly consistant cooperation regardless of different programs |  |  | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968
Cooperative Behavior In A Mixed-Motive Game | [NAME] | II | 22798 | No, matching program |  | Arg, not quantified | 60 | Yes |  |  | Yes | Men |  | Yale University |  |  |  | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968
Effects of Level of Cooperative Choice by the Other Player On Choices in a Prisoner's Dilemma Game Part II | [NAME], and [NAME] | Part II | 1963 | No, .05 & .95% cooperative program- but were lead to believe PVP |  | 0.2945 | 200 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Both | No | [NAME] University(Ohio) |  | 21 | 1018 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 1166 SAT: N/A ACT: 22 | Pg. 1228 SAT: N/A ACT: 21.8
Personality and Attitudinal Correlates of Trustworthy Behaviors in a Two-person Game | [NAME] | I | 1966 | Yes | 0.3214285714285715 |  | 2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Women | No | George Peabody College for Teachers(Tennessee) | College Attended: George Peabody College for Teachers merged with Vanderbilt University in 1979 | 31 | 2770 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 1420 SAT: N/A ACT: 24 | Pg. 1493 SAT: N/A ACT: 21.5
Effects of Prisoner's [NAME] on Cooperative behavior | [NAME] and [NAME] |  | 1966 | No, cooperative experimenter- but were lead to believe PVP |  | 0.48 | 50 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Both | No | Kansas State College of Pittsburg |  | 22 | 1100 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 523 SAT: N/A ACT: 19 | Pg. 585 SAT: N/A ACT: 19.7
Sex Differences in Factors Contributing to the Level of Cooperation in the Prisoner's [NAME] | [NAME]; and [NAME] m> Chammah |  | 1965 | Yes | 0.385 | 0.1925 | 300 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Both | No | University of Michigan- Ann Arbor |  | 28.5 | 1320 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | P.745 SAT: v=578, m=621 | P.807 SAT: v=580, m=623
Cooperative Choices in a Prisoner's Dilemma | [NAME] |  | 1965 | Yes | 0.3225 |  | 80 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Both | No | [NAME]) |  | 20 | 1314 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 750 SAT: v=501, [NAME] | Pg. 812 SAT: v=469, m=486
Reward Structure and Cooperation: The Decomposed Prisoner's [NAME] | [NAME] | Game I | 1967 | Yes | 0.55 |  | 20 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Both | No | University of Delaware |  | 25.2 | 1222.4 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 286 SAT: v=5320, m=550 | Pg. 324 SAT: v=533, m=564
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Suppliment | [NAME] | Experiment II | 1968 | Yes | 0.251 | 0.18 | 30 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Men | No | University of New York- Buffalo and Canisius College |  | 24 | 1137 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | UNY-Buffalo:  Only 1stat given for all UNY Pg. 1008 SAT: v=587, m=591 ACT: N/A Canisius: Pg. 945 SAT: v=540, m=574 | UNY-Buffalo: Pg. 1102 SAT: v=564, m=599 ACT: N/A Canisius: Pg. 1003 SAT: v=500, m=570
Power, the Use of Power, and Cooperative choice in a Two-Person Game | [NAME], [NAME], and [NAME] | Experiment I (Passive) | 1968 | Yes |  | 0.5349999999999999 | 80 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Men | No | Wayne State University |  | 20 | 1314 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 750 SAT: v=501, [NAME] | Pg. 812 SAT: v=469, m=486
Effects of Level of Cooperative Choice by the Other Player On Choices in a Prisoner's Dilemma Game Part I | [NAME], [NAME], and [NAME] |  | 1963 | No, .83 cooperative experimenter- but were lead to believe PVP |  | 0.3409090909090909 | 60 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Both | No | Kent State University |  |  |  | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968
Communication Schedule and Cooperative Game Behavior | [NAME] and [NAME] |  | 1971 | Yes | 0.1943333333333333 | 0.332 | 100 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Both | Yes | University of South Florida |  | 24 | 1135 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 331 SAT: v=504, m=524 | Pg. 373 SAT: v=500, m=500
Effects of Incentive Magnitude on Cooperation in the Prisoner's [NAME] | [NAME] and [NAME] | I | 1971 | Yes | 0.3333666666666666 |  | 20 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Both | No | San Diego State University |  | 22 | 1074 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 192 SAT:N/A ACT: 22 | Pg. 190 SAT: v=523, m=500 ACT: 22.09
Effects of Incentive Magnitude on Cooperation in the Prisoner's [NAME] | [NAME] and [NAME] | II | 1971 | Yes | 0.3944 |  | 20 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Both | No | San Diego State University |  | 22 | 1074 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 192 SAT:N/A ACT: 22 | Pg. 190 SAT: v=523, m=500 ACT: 22.09
Cooperation and Optimal Responding in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game:  Effects of Sex and Physical Attractiveness | [NAME], Hoe Hottes, and [NAME] | Experiment I (Noncontingent) | 1971 | Yes | 0.318 |  | 75 | Yes | Yes | No, extra credit | Yes | Both | No | Iowa State University |  | 24 | 1210 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 497 SAT: N/A ACT: 26 | Pg. 558 SAT: N/A ACT: 25
Cooperation and Optimal Responding in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game:  Effects of Sex and Physical Attractiveness | [NAME], Hoe Hottes, and [NAME] | Experiment I (Noncontingent) | 1971 | Yes | 0.406 |  | 75 | Yes | Yes | No, extra credit | Yes | Both | No | Iowa State University | Interaction:No verbal interaction btw players took place, but physical attractiveness assessment was taken | 24 | 1210 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 497 SAT: N/A ACT: 26 | Pg. 558 SAT: N/A ACT: 25
Affective and Emotional Responses As A Function of Other Person's Gaze and Cooperativeness in a 2-Person Game | [NAME] and [NAME] |  | 1971 | No, 100% and 95% cooperative experimentor- but were lead to believe PVP | 0.269 |  | 50 | Yes | Yes | No | No | Men | Yes, Confederate's expression was visible and purposefully blank | Claremont McKenna College |  | 31 | 1400 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 158 SAT: v= 90% above 50% above 500 and 10% above 700  SAT: m= 97% above 500 70% above 600 and 24% above 700 | Pg. 196 SAT: N/A ACT: N/A
Communication In Non-Zero-Sum Games | [NAME] and [NAME] |  | 1972 | Yes | 0.3233333333333334 | 0.4533333333333334 | 100 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Female | Yes | [NAME] Ontario | Interaction: Some students didn't communicate, some had the option of cummunication, and others were forced to communicate |  |  | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 |  | ACT: 25
Payment Schedule, sequence of choice, and cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game | [NAME] and [NAME] |  | 1966 | Yes | 0.602375 |  | 100 | Yes | See Note | Yes | Yes | Both | No | University of Kansas | Response: was alternated between Simultaneous and alternating | 24 | 1110 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | P.538 SAT: N/A ACT: N/A | P. 598 SAT: N/A ACT: 23.6
Is Game Behavior Related to Other Interpersonsal Situations | [NAME] |  | 1969 | Yes |  |  | 90 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Both | No | San Diego State College |  |  |  | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968
Effect of Incentive Magnitude on Cooperation in the Prisoner's [NAME] | [NAME], [NAME], [NAME] |  | 1969 | Yes |  | 0.318 | 100 | Yes | Yes | Yes, see note | No | Both | No | Columbia University- Teacher's College | Test Scores:  These were not provided specific to the teacher's college so I used Columbia University scores Monetary Reward:  real and imaginary dollars were used | 33 | 1409 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 960 SAT: v=667, m=677 | Pg. 1021 SAT: v=680, m=685
Effects of Isolation and Communication on Cooperation in a 2-person Game | [NAME] | (Isolated Condition) | 1970 | Yes | 0.407 |  | 70, see note | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Female | No | Claremont McKenna College | Date: Actual testing was done in the summer of '68 Trials: To eliminate end game bias students were told 84 trials and completed only 78, while only 70 were used for analysis Cooperation: Median was used | 31 | 1400 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 158 SAT: v= 90% above 50% above 500 and 10% above 700  SAT: m= 97% above 500 70% above 600 and 24% above 700 | Pg. 196 SAT: N/A ACT: N/A
Matrix Values and Cooperative Behavior in the Prisoner's [NAME] | Brooks Jones, [NAME], [NAME], and [NAME] |  | 1968 | Yes | 0.2833333333333334 |  | 100 | Yes | Yes | No | No | Both | No | University of Miami | Graph only | 27.5 | 1316 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 328 SAT: v=490, m=501 | P.370 SAT: v=476, m=504
Temptation to Defect in the Prisoner Dilemma Game | [NAME] and [NAME] |  | 1970 | No, player vs. experimentor- but were lead to believe PVP |  | 0.3125 | 40 | Yes | Yes | No | No | Both | No | Wayne State University |  | 20 | 1314 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 750 SAT: v=501, [NAME] | Pg. 812 SAT: v=469, m=486
Communication, the Development of Trust and Cooperative Behavior | [NAME] |  |  | No, player vs. experimentor- but were lead to believe PVP |  | 0.28 | 5 | Yes | Yes | No | No | Both | No | Queens College | Trials: exact number of trials was vague | 24 | 1035 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 952 SAT: v=550, m=575 ACT: N/A | Pg. 1012 SAT: N/A ACT: N/A
Factors Affecting Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma | [NAME] | Harvard | 1965 | Yes |  |  | 100 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |  | No | Harvard | Graph Only Date: Actual testing was done in the spring of '63 | 33.8 | 1496 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 665 SAT: v=680, [NAME] | Pg. 729 SAT: v=680, m=712
Factors Affecting Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma | [NAME] | MIT | 1965 | Yes |  |  | 100 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |  | No | MIT | Graph Only Date: Actual testing was done in the spring of '64 | 32 | 1477 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | Pg. 672 SAT: v=677, m=751 | Pg. 738 SAT: v=658, m=740
Factors Affecting Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma | [NAME] | Northeastern Univesity | 1965 | Yes |  |  | 100 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |  | No | Northeastern University | Graph Only Date: Actual testing was done in the spring of '65 | 26 | 1273 | Characteristics of Freshman including SAT and other scores are not provided by American Universities and College prior to 1968 | P. 678 SAT: v=538, m=578 ACT: N/A | P. 745 SAT: N/A ACT: N/A