Spreadsheet: 6c9559c8-3bc1-4f4c-8215-110b56be4e61
Sheet: Sheet1

Selection Criteria | Description | Points Earned/Possible | Percentage Earned | Possible to Gain | Explanation
Competitive | Emphasis on STEM | 0/15 | 0 | 0 | All points or nothing criteria
(E)(1) | Intervening in the lowest-achieving schools and LEAs | 1/10 | 0.01 | 4 | Better narrative
(D)(1) | Providing high-quality pathways for aspiring teachers and principals | 6.8/21 | 0.324 | 0 | Not without legislative changes
(A)(1)(iii) | Translating LEA participation into statewide impact | 5.6/15 | 0.373 | 3 | If [NAME] clause removed and new MOUs
(D)(2)(iv) | Using evaluations to inform key decisions | 12.6/28 | 0.45 | 5 | With the KLN schools only
(F)(2) | Ensuring successful conditions for high-performing charter schools and other innovative schools | 19.4/40 | 0.485 | 5 | Better narrative
(A)(3)(ii) | Improving student outcomes | 12.8/25 | 0.512 | 3 | Better narrative
(D)(2) | Improving teacher and principal effectiveness based on performance | 32.4/58 | 0.559 | 5 | Better narrative
(A)(3) | Demonstrating significant progress in raising achievement and closing gaps | 16.8/30 | 0.56 | 5 | More narrative
(D)(2)(i) | Measuring student growth | 2.8/5 | 0.56 | 0 | In development; difficult to accelerate timeline
(A)(1) | Articulating State's education reform agenda & LEAs participation in it | 41.8/65 | 0.643 | 10 | Better narrative; [NAME] clause removal
(D)(4) | Improving the effectiveness of teacher and principal preparation programs | 9.2/14 | 0.657 | 2 | Better narrative
(A)(2)(i) | Ensuring the capacity to implement | 13.2/20 | 0.666 | 6.8 | Better narrative
(D)(2)(iii) | Conducting annual evaluations | 6.8/10 | 0.68 | 2 | With the KLN schools only
(D)(2)(ii) | Developing evaluation systems | 10.2/15 | 0.68 | 2 | With the KLN schools only
(A)(2) | Building strong statewide capacity to implement, scale up and sustain proposed plans | 20.6/30 | 0.687 | 4 | If [NAME] clause removed and new MOUs
(A)(1)(ii) | Securing [NAME] commitment | 31.8/45 | 0.707 | 5 | If [NAME] clause removed and new MOUs
(C)(3) | Using data to improve instruction | 12.8/18 | 0.711 | 3 | Better narrative
(B)(3) | Supporting the transition to enhanced standards and high-quality assessments | 14.8/20 | 0.74 | 3 | Better narrative
(A)(2)(ii) | Using broad stakeholder support | 7.4/10 | 0.74 | 1 | More letters of support
(C)(2) | Accessing and using state data | 3.8/5 | 0.76 | 1 | Better narrative
(F)(3) | Demonstrating other significant reform conditions | 3.8/5 | 0.76 | 1 | More in narrative
(F)(1) | Making education funding a priority | 7.8/10 | 0.78 | 0 | Not with current economic situation
(A)(3)(i) | Making progress in each reform area | 4/5 | 0.8 | 0 | Difficult to gain the additional point
(D)(5) | Providing effective support to teachers and principals | 16/20 | 0.8 | 0 | In development; difficult to accelerate timeline
(E)(1)(ii) | Turning around the persistently lowest-achieving schools | 28.6/35 | 0.817 | 4 | Additional information provided
(C)(1) | Fully implementing a statewide longitudinal data system | 20/24 | 0.833 | 0 | In development; difficult to accelerate timeline
(E)(2) | Turning around the lowest-achieving schools | 33.4/40 | 0.835 | 3 | Additional information provided
(D)(3)(i) | Ensuring equitable distribution in high-poverty or high-minority schools | 12.8/15 | 0.853 | 0 | Local control isssue
(A)(1)(i) | Articulating comprehensive, coherent reform agenda | 4.4/5 | 0.88 | 0 | Difficult to gain the additional .6 points
(B)(1)(ii) | Adopting standards | 17.8/20 | 0.89 | 2.2 | If standards adopted by June
(D)(3)(i) | Ensuring equitable distribution of effective teachers and principals | 22.2/25 | 0.89 | 0 | Local control issue
(B)(2) | Developing and implementing common, high-quality assessments | 9.2/10 | 0.92 | 0 | Difficult to gain the additional .8 points
(D)(3)(ii) | Ensuring equitable distribution in hard-to-staff subjects and specialty areas | 9.4/10 | 0.94 | 0 | Difficult to gain the additional .6 points
(B)(1) | Developing and adopting common standards | 37.8/40 | 0.945 | 2.2 | If standards adopted by June
(E)(2)(i) | Identifying the persistently lowest-achieving schools | 4.8/5 | 0.96 | 0 | Difficult to gain the additional .2 points
(B)(1)(i) | Participating in consortium developing high-quality standards | 20/20 | 1 | 0 | N/A
 | Total Points Earned in Phase I | 329.6
 | Estimated Additional Points That Could be Earned in Phase II |  |  | 82.2
 | Total Estimated Points in Phase II |  |  |  | 411.8