Spreadsheet: louise_kitchen__24115__cash_flow12_20
Sheet: Original Open Issues

 | SUMMARY OF OPEN HPL ISSUES |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | CONFIDENTIAL – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
 | As of 9/27/01
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Responsibility
 |  | AEP Position |  |  | ENE Position |  |  | Action Items | ENE Area | ENE Exposure | ENE | AEP
1. | TX General Land Office Prepay: Contract #96059967 | An amount of gas valued at $409.4K (the “Land Office Payment”) was received from The General Land Office in exchange for AEP storing gas provided by The Texas General Land Office (the “Land Office Gas”). |  |  | ENE is under no obligation to return or prorate any prepayments received prior to closing.  The prepayment contracts were acquired in their entirety as a consequence of the “equity purchase” nature of the transaction. |  |  | Respond to AEP's Final Working Capital Calculation in writing before 10/27/01 and make payment for negotiated amount of $264K | [NAME] | -264000 | [NAME] | [NAME] | Additional Exposure
 |  | The value was based on a 15% of the gas volumes received from The General Land Office [during the periods beginning Feb 1, 01 and ending May 1, 01 plus the beginning balance] priced at a 1 June IF/HSC price of $3.78. |  |  | At worst case ENE could make an offer less costs = $250 in an attempt to settle this matter, however, ENE has informed AEP in a response letter dated 8/27 that such claims should count against the [basket of notional funds] to cover such indemnities up to $15MM set forth in the [NAME] and Sale Agreement (“PSA”)
 |  | AEP has demanded in a Final Working Capital Calculation Stmt and letter dated 8/29 to be paid for the full value for this gas, as AEP is providing the storage services to The General Land Office.
2. | Cannon Interests Prepay:                            Contract #96059933 | Payments were received from Cannon in the amounts of $400K on March 1, 2000 and $525K on March 1, 2001 for storage services to be rendered by HPL.  AEP believes the start date should be 03/01/01, which was listed incorrectly on the confirm. |  |  | Payments received in 2000 were for services rendered in 2000 and should not be taken into consideration. |  |  | Respond to AEP's Final Working Capital Calculation in writing before 10/27/01 and make payment for negotiated amount of $393K | [NAME] | -393000 | [NAME] | [NAME] | Additional Exposure
 |  | AEP has demanded in a Final Working Capital Stmt and letter dated 8/29 to receive a portion of this payment based on the period of time that AEP and ENE owned HPL which they calculated of $693K |  |  | ENE disagrees that AEP is due a portion of the 2001 payment from Cannon. ENE is under no obligation to return or prorate any prepayments received prior to closing.  The prepayment contracts were acquired in their entirety as a consequence of the “equity purchase” nature of the transaction.
 |  |  |  |  | At worst case ENE could make an offer of the 2001 prorated amount = $393k in an attempt to settle this matter, however, ENE has informed AEP in a response letter dated 8/27 that such claims should count against the [basket of notional funds] to cover such indemnities set forth in the PSA
 |  |  |  |  | There is an additional deposit from Cannon that ENE currently holds of $2.1MM that AEP will eventually likely argue that will need to be refunded.  AEP has not mentioned this to date.  ENE believes such claims should count against the [basket of notional funds] to cover such indemnities up to $15MM set forth in the PSA
3. | Cannon Storage Hedge:  Contract #96059167 | This agreement should be treated as a fixed price agreement rather than an index based agreement |  |  | This is a synthetic storage agreement, not a fixed price agreement, as the contract pricing is already based on index.  The Cannon Agreement dated 02/10/00, under a Master Firm PSA dated 02/01/00 is an index-based agreement (w/ multiple index-based price structures). |  |  | AEP has agreed to take this issue off the table | [NAME] | 0 | [NAME], [NAME] | B. Reed | Additional Exposure
 |  | As a fixed price agreement, a fixed for index swap should have been put in place with respect to this agreement. |  |  | Therefore, there is no obligation on ENA’s part to put a fixed price swap in place.  Only contracts that involve a fixed price gas sale or purchase were agreed by both parties for a fixed for floating swap.
 |  | Has communicated their position in their letter dated 8/14 |  |  | No hedge, which was recently calculated to be valued, at $3,007,000 will be transferred.
 |  |  |  |  | We sent a response letter dated 8/27 to AEP stating our position that ENE is under no obligation to put a fixed price swap in place.
4. | [NAME]:   Contract #96019236 | The Centana Gas Storage Contract was assigned from ENA to HPL. |  |  | Contract is an ENA contract and should not have been transferred to HPL |  |  | [NAME] or deduct from the inventory refund the   Sale of the gas in place: 1,236,286 MMBtu’s * $3.275 = $4,048,836 based on 9/7/01 Gas Daily  (our balance on balance sheet is $3,625,261 | [NAME] | 0 | [NAME] | [NAME] | Additional Exposure
 |  | The Centana Gas Storage Contract is necessary to conduct the business of HPL on an ongoing basis in the same manner that it was conducted prior to Close. |  |  | Terms were restructured to not match with HPL, No provisions for the sale of gas in Centana storage, representations made to FERC, never discussed/agreed, and not a scheduled material contract as it was an ENA contract, |  |  | ENE will be responsible for June/July service: Storage Demand 1,000,000 MMBtu * $.075 + Deliverability Demand 110,000 * $.183 = $95,130 (June has been paid, July has not) | [NAME] | -95130 |  |  | Additional Exposure
 |  | AEP is willing to purchase the gas currently in storage as of August 15, 2001 at a price equal to 90% of HSC/Beaumont for large packages of gas for October which would calculate to be $3,567,000. |  |  | The contract terminated on 1 July – no formal notice was given to Centana to extend the contract. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Additional Exposure
 |  | Has communicated their position in their letter dated 8/14.  ENE should keep AEP whole on position with additional costs of AEP to set-up new storage contract ($500K) |  |  | Nothing in the PSA grants, assigns or provides any right of HPL or AEP to the gas in storage under the Centana Agreement.  Such gas now and prior to [NAME] was and is an ENA asset.  As such, the gas volumes in the Centana Storage Facility were not included in the HPL working gas inventory or otherwise reflected as an asset of HPL on HPL’s balance sheet.
 |  | AEP has also shown ENE letter of assignment from two years ago.  If HPL had contract assigned in 1998, then ENE should not have to keep HPL whole on not notifying to extend contract on May 1. |  |  | As the Centana Storage Contract was mistakenly assigned to AEP, and in an effort to settle the matter, ENE will agree to sell the gas stored under the contract to AEP at the 1 July IF/HSC price which would total $4,030 + June service of $95K and prorated ad valorem tax of $56K.
 |  |  |  |  | We sent a response letter dated 8/27 to AEP stating our position . |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (Additional Exposure)
5. | Lyondell/Citgo | AEP has not responded to our issue in writing |  |  | ENE discovered that a fixed to index hedge should have been transferred to AEP with the assignment of this contract |  |  | AEP has agreed to pay ENE a calculated estimate of $1.75MM | [NAME] | 0 | [NAME] | [NAME] | Additional Exposure
 |  |  |  |  | ENE calculates the value of this hedge to be $1,581,300 as of August 30.
 |  |  |  |  | ENE communicated to AEP in a letter dated 8/27 that this hedge should be assigned to AEP and payment made by AEP to and ENE.
6. | Gas Lift Deposits | There are $50,450 in customer deposits relating to several gas lift sales which are not accurately accounted for at Closing |  |  | Per  the [NAME] and Sale Agreement: Schedule 4.7(b) #5 – Exception to Balance Sheet: |  |  | 1.  [NAME] to AEP's Final Working Capital Calculation in writing before 10/27/01.  ENE has agreed to pay. | LOA (HPL) | -50450 | [NAME] | [NAME] | LOA BS
 |  | AEP has demanded in a Final Working Capital Statement and letter that they require full reimbursement for these amounts |  |  | “Certain customers have made deposits with HPL as security for future defaults..…The responsibility for refunding such deposits will be retained by HPL post-Closing.”
7. | Specialty Sands Payment | Communicated in a letter dated 8/14 that the sum of $91,000 paid by Specialty Sand to ENE pursuant to a settlement agreement to cover costs of repairs should be reimbursed to HPL since HPL is incurring the costs of such repairs |  |  | All cash of HPL was retained by ENE as an Excluded Asset and the Specialty Sands litigation (in which HPL was a plaintiff) was specifically listed by ENE prior to its settlement as retained litigation, along with the right to a recovery there from.  However, strictly as an accommodation, we agreed to pay this amount ($91K).  This was communicated to AEP in a letter from dated 8/27. |  |  | ENE has agreed to pay | LOA (HPL) | -91000 | [NAME] | [NAME] | LOA BS
8. | Transport Agreements | The following transportation contracts are not necessary to the conduct of HPL’s business or, if they are, suitable alternatives exist.  HPL is willing to assign these contracts back to ENE: |  |  | Stated agreement in our letter dated 8/27 and included assignment agreements with the letter to reconvey these agreements to ENA  [NAME] has determined ENE alternatives to these contracts and assignment is no longer necessary |  |  | None | LOA (HPL) | 0 | [NAME] | AEP legal
 |  | *   EPGT Texas Pipeline, L.P. - 96006479
 |  | *   EPGT Texas Pipeline, L.P. - 96041930
 |  | *   Gas Transmission TECO, Inc. - 96041723
 |  | *   Gas Transmission TECO, Inc. - 96041724
9. | ISC/SAP Billing | AEP feels that they should not have to pay.  They feel we were just providing the books and records of the company |  |  | AEP owes ENE $86K to compensate ENE for work performed in formatting data to meet the requirements of PeopleSoft. |  |  | Continue to discuss with AEP accountants, use leverage with other IT service issues | LOA (HPL) | -86000 | [NAME], [NAME] | AEP legal | LOA BS
 |  |  |  |  | The real cost here was to format this information to load into their PeopleSoft system which was done at their accounting group’s verbal request.  [NAME] and [NAME] were provided a written estimate of these costs back on 04/09/01 and asked to respond if there were any questions or issues.  They did not bring up any issues until after they had received the data.
10. | IT Services Fees | In exchange for AEP purchasing ENE’s gas in the Centana storage field at 90% of the IF/HSC index for October, AEP requests that ENE: |  |  | ENE sees no benefit to ENE for reducing the pricing provisions under the IT Service Agreement. |  |  | Continue to bill and collect the contractual amounts at the beginning of each month | Net Works | -1800000 | [NAME] | [NAME] | Additional Exposure
 |  | *     Reduce the fee payable by HPL to $100,000 during the second and third six month periods of the term of the IT Services Agreement.  This would be $1,800,000 reduction |  |  | This was agreed to up-front and we are providing the service requested of us, AEP should pay the $200,000/mo for 2nd 6 mos. And $300,000/mo for 3rd 6 mos.
 |  | *     Provide for further fee reductions as Applications and Services are no longer required by AEP
 |  | *     AEP expects to receive PGAS and ROW Database assets.  AEP likely agrees on PGAS amount and will likely pay only $1.6MM for POPS |  |  | AEP should pay for a fair price for the PGAS and ROW database.  ENE has sent AEP bills to sell PGAS for $513K and POPS for $2.0MM |  |  | Final settlement on sale of POPS/PGAS is conditional on settling other commercial issues. |  |  | [NAME] | [NAME]
 |  | *     AEP has not paid the outstanding [NAME] invoice |  |  | There should be no issues related to [NAME].  We have provided them with all of the models that were stored on our network.  Any issues between [NAME] and HPL are strictly between them since Enron was not a party to that agreement
11. | Pre-Close Invoices | AEP has sent June invoices totaling ($965) and July of ($378) invoices and are currently accumulating August and Sept invoices |  |  | ENE has made payment for June invoices of $943, disputed one June invoice for a truck purchased on 5/24 for $22K.  July invoices have been sent and returned by ENE for additiona approvals.  Aug and later invoice payments are being accumulated and will be forwarded when available |  |  | Finalized the review of June ($378) invoices send back for additional approvals.  August and later invoices will be reviewed and paid in accordance with the Purchasing Protocol when received | LOA (HPL) |  | [NAME] | Dedicker | LOA BS
12. | Working Gas  Inventory True Up | *    AEP has submitted to ENE an “Inventory Calculation Statement” to ENE on 8/14 totaling $17,773 + interest $3K/day |  |  | *     ENE owes AEP a response on their agreement or disagreement with AEP’s “Inventory Calculation Statement” 60 days following the receipt of the statement (8/14).  Any dispute is to be resolved by 90 days following the receipt of the statement.  We plan to indicate a disagreement to the statement for the value of gas that should have been sold to AEP in Centana Storage.  Other items that could also be deducted if they are not paid include: |  |  | Maintain a calculation of the potential adjustments to the inventory calculation and accrue interest on the unpaid balance.  Interest of $400K thru 9/30 | [NAME] | -400000 | [NAME] | [NAME] | Additional Exposure
 |  |  |  |  | *     Value of hedge in Lyondell/Citgo Contract
 |  |  |  |  | *     Value of SAP/ISC Payment
 |  |  |  |  | *     Value of Other Payment Amounts due to ENE
 |  |  |  |  | ENE has hedged the 7/1 price and the financial impact should be minimal |  |  | Respond to AEP's Inventory Calculation Statement in writing before 10/14/01
13. | Calpine Guarantee | Unclear |  |  | AEP needs to replace ENE guarantee or AEP should indemnify ENE for any liabilities to Calpine. |  |  | In order to release ENE's collateral obligation, AEP needs to execute the substitute and release agreement (should be signed by Calpine) | LOA (HPL) | 0 | [NAME], [NAME] | AEP legal
14. | Guadalupe Contract | Unclear |  |  | AEP and ENE need to execute a back-to-back agreement.  Enron submitted a form of agreement to AEP, but has not received a response as of yet. |  |  | 1.  [NAME] that AEP send comments back on back-to-back contract  2.  [NAME] sent response letter to TIE approving to reimburse GPP for costs of consultants working on the assignment of guaranty, up to $15K and requesting a face-to-face meeting b/w GPP, TIE, AEP, ENE, and CCPace in October  3.  Determine who are GPP's lenders and, once known, supply names to [NAME] and [NAME] in order to contact directly | LOA (HPL) | -500000 | [NAME], [NAME] | D. Hyvl | LOA BS
 |  |  |  |  | *   ENE needs to finalize the release from guaranty to avoid the additional $500k to AEP |  |  |  |  |  | [NAME] ? (RAC)
15. | Spinnaker (Coastline) | Should have minimal involvement |  |  | ENE sent an offer letter to Coastline on 8/20 to settle for $2.4MM, offer expires on 9/21/01, Coastline is seeking $3.4 - 5.0MM.  Largest subcontractor (Caldine), whom is owed $2.2MM, has not been communicated to.  Subcontractors will likely force Coastline into bankruptcy |  |  | [NAME] has counterofferd to settle at $2.55 with [NAME] of Coastline, awaiting response | LOA (HPL) | -5000000 | [NAME] | N/A | LOA BS
16. | Imbalances | AEP will be responsible for contacting customers to settle outstanding imbalances that ENE retained.  They currently have a list of volumetric imbalance amounts from ENE |  |  | ENE  forwarded in Aug to AEP the dollars for many of the counterparties associated with the imbalances on their balance sheet based on prior WACOGs |  |  | Work proactively to seek settlements, and possibly send ENE resources to AEP to assist
 |  | By 1/15/02 (15 days after the 12/31/01 “Imbalance Determination Date”) AEP will send the outstanding balance for determining the “Remaining Imbalance Position”,  If greater than $250,000, the net amount will need to be settled in cash unless notice is sent to continue imbalance efforts thru 3/31/02.  If less than $250,000 AEP will take responsibility for all remaining imbalances, otherwise efforts will continue. |  |  | 1.  Receivables $19,032,693 as of 8/1 |  |  | Work with AEP to minimize our financial impact in settling imbalances | LOA (HPL) | 14167840 | [NAME], [NAME] | Dedicker | LOA BS
 |  | AEP can send written notice to continue the Imbalance management arrangement through 3/31/02 (the “Final Imbalance Determination Date”) |  |  | 2.  Payables ($23,951,233) as of 8/1 |  |  | Exposure listed of $2MM is simply a ballpark estimate | LOA (HPL) | -18792046 | [NAME], [NAME] | Dedicker | LOA BS
 |  | Both AEP and ENE would need to mutually agree to extend efforts beyond 3/31/02 |  |  | ENE should strive to meet the $250,000 net amount by 1/15/02 and then pass all future responsibility to AEP but should maintain a reserve for potential additional settlements ($2,472,000) had been calculated based on a % of imbalance volumes |  |  | Will set up next meeting for 1st week of Oct | LOA (HPL) | -2472000 | [NAME], [NAME] | Dedicker | LOA BS
17. | A/S Line | Agree on the "Determination of Future A/S Line Costs " by 12/31/01 |  |  | Agree on the "Determination of Future A/S Line Costs" by 12/31/01 |  |  | 1.  Process invoices and bring closure to our exposure  2.  [NAME] to send corresponsdence to [NAME] (El Paso attorney) on what we need from them to help quantify and bring closure to our future AS Line obligations; need a date certain)  3.  [NAME] to contact [NAME] regarding netting outstanding receivables against our invoice payments.  See #18 below | LOA (HPL) | -10258000 | [NAME], [NAME] | [NAME], K. Kaase | LOA BS
 |  |  |  |  | Need to finalize payments to Channel, need Enron closure on RRC letter and property damage litigation |  |  |  |  |  |  | El Paso: [NAME]
18. | Trade Receivables | Should have minimal involvement |  |  | 100's of outstanding balances needing individual commercial negotiation.  Total receivable debits as of 8/31 was over $7.0MM, estimated reserve of $2.0MM being maintained  Biggest problems are: El Paso ($1.5MM), [NAME] ($0.5MM)  [NAME] supplied information to [NAME] |  |  | 1.  [NAME] and manage balances  2.  [NAME] who will contact [NAME]  3.  [NAME] to provide statistics of progress to [NAME] | LOA (HPL) | 6170208 | [NAME], [NAME],  [NAME] |  | LOA BS
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | LOA (HPL) | -2000000 | [NAME], [NAME],  [NAME]
19. | Preferred Pipeline Receivable | Follow up with Preferred Pipeline on their final offer letter for $39,896 sent to Preferred Pipeline on 8/24.  [NAME] had previously made a verbal offer of $25,000. |  |  | Keep in contact with AEP on collection efforts, there is $0 exposure and only upside as receivable was apparently written off in the past |  |  | 1.  [NAME] and manage balances  2.  [NAME] (AEP) awaiting confirmation of collection from K. Gruesen | LOA (HPL) | 0 | [NAME] | [NAME],  [NAME]
20. | TX Department of Transportation and other Non-Commodity Receivables | AEP has cooperated in providing data in assisting ENE billing and collection efforts.  Further involvement might still be necessary |  |  | Is currently working on collecting billed invoices and obtaining data to generate unbilled amounts.  Total outstanding is $3,244,343 of which $2,458,272 is with TDOT.  Exposure is unknown; however there will likely be writeoffs and thus a reserve should be maintained (i.e. $500K) |  |  | 1.  [NAME] and manage balances  2.  ENE accounting ([NAME], [NAME]) need to meet with AEP to discuss all non-trade issues | LOA (HPL) | 3261691 | [NAME], G. Whiting | Dedicker
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | LOA (HPL) | -500000 | [NAME], G. Whiting | Dedicker
21. | Ad Valorem and other Taxes | AEP and Enron to split tax payments at year-end |  |  | Reimburse AEP for ad valorem taxes at year-end |  |  | Review AEP support and make appropriate payments. Liabilities of $8.4MM are recorded which should hopefully cover our costs | LOA (HPL) | -8407582 | [NAME],  [NAME] | Dedicker | LOA BS
22. | Use Tax Audit | Should have minimal involvement |  |  | Per [NAME], Use Tax audit liability of $3.1mm should be sufficient to cover our future costs and that audits should be wrapping up by the end of 2001 |  |  | 1.  [NAME] and manage balances 2.  Need to finalize audit with the State and make final settlement payments | LOA (HPL) | -3181000 | [NAME],  [NAME] | N/A | LOA BS
23. | Stone Energy | Has sent an invoice of $35K to ENE to pay Stone Energy which they claim HPL owes based on a letter agreement signed by [NAME] dated 5/8/98 |  |  | The letter proposal which was superseded by a gas contract, per [NAME], based on our actions, is binding and we owe $35K |  |  | Pay Stone Energy in accordance with the Purchasing Protocol | LOA (HPL) | -35000 | [NAME],  [NAME] | Dedicker,  [NAME] | LOA BS
 |  | The letter agreement states that HPL would reimburse Stone for 1/2 of the well connect costs for $70,000 if 100% of the supply went to the Mitchell Dehy and Separation Plant which they clam has happened
24. | Deferred Debit Reserves | N/A |  |  | N/A |  |  | Finalize reconciliations, determine exact amount of the reserves and book correcting entries | LOA (HPL) | 4200000 | [NAME] |  | LOA BS
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Reserve for potential writeoffs as the Deferred Debit accounts are reconciled | LOA (HPL) | -2895000 | [NAME] |  | LOA BS
25. | Working Capital |  |  |  | Manage working capital as the post HPL issues are settled |  |  | Working Capital will likely be needed as post HPL issues are settled and thus a reserve for potential additional working capital needs should be maintained | LOA (HPL) | -1000000 | [NAME]
26. | Vinson & Elkins Bill |  |  |  |  |  |  | Pay V&E bill when received, estimated to be $3MM | LOA (HPL) | -3000000 | [NAME] |  | LOA BS
27. | TerraCo (Environmental Liability) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.  Accounting to transfer reserve from HPL to TerraCo, HPL to have no future responsibilty 2.  [NAME] to complete work through year-end 3.  [NAME] to encompass estimate for costs/losses for 2002 plan 4.  [NAME] to coordinate outside bids (possible turnkey project) 5.  Decide on who does work: in-house or 3rd party 6.  Condsider change in TerraCo officers 7.  [NAME], Victoria as potential negotiation tool w/ AEP | TerrraCo | -1000000 | [NAME], [NAME] |  | LOA BS
28. | Non-HPL Reserve |  |  |  |  |  |  | Reserve unrelated to HPL, should be fully utilized by 12/01 | LOA (HPL) | -3334000 | [NAME]
29. | Trade Payables |  |  |  |  |  |  | Outstanding payables will be settled as approached by vendors, otherwise balances will sit until thru statue of limitations | LOA (HPL) | -3507653 | [NAME] |  | LOA BS
30. | Note Payable: Enron Compressor Services |  |  |  |  |  |  | Note created when ECS was originally financed, Upstream Compression group is currently considering cash settling this | LOA (HPL) | -2193093 | [NAME] |  | LOA BS
31. | Note Payable - Enron Holdings |  |  |  |  |  |  | This is a Note Payable with another Enron entity which will need to ultimately be non-cash settled or assigned to another Enron entity | LOA (HPL) | -75000000 | [NAME] |  | LOA BS
32. | Deferred Federal Income Tax Liability |  |  |  |  |  |  | Should clear once the balance sheet has been cleaned up | LOA (HPL) | -1986489 | [NAME] |  | LOA BS
33. | Adonis Energy |  |  |  |  |  |  | [NAME] to resolve; ENE sent demand letter to CP&L (AEP) for $200k, we now need to go after this. | LOA (HPL) | 0 | [NAME]
34. | Hart Scott Rodino  Interest Payment | AEP feels this payment is not applicable to the transaction |  |  |  |  |  | 1.  Asset claim by end-of-year limitation 2.  Collect by reducing Inventory true-up payment *   ENE has calculated Interest Rate Payment to be $2,108,870 Base Purchase Price ($332.5MM) * Daily Prime Rate * 32 days (May 1 - June 1) | LOA (HPL) | 0 | Legal, [NAME]
35. | AEP Credit Request | [NAME] at AEP has asked for credit information on small supply customers that AEP has never received.  D. Hart to send official request in writing. |  |  | ENE agrees to supply basic historical information.  However, AEP should reimburse ENE if significant work is required by Credit. |  |  | [NAME] to send official request for additional credit information in writing  Discuss with [NAME] once request is received | LOA (HPL) | 0
36. | Dow Receivable Litigation |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.  [NAME] to meet w/ Dow 2.  [NAME] to obtain information from J. Ducote @ AEP | LOA (HPL) | -1000000 |  |  | LOA BS
 | Total
 | Texas Desk Exposure
 | Net Works Exposure
 | TerraCo Exposure
37. | Total LOA (HPL) Shareholders Equity
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | check!
 |  | *     We believe AEP agrees to that they should pay rent for the 5 measurement employees at Three Allen |  |  | AEP should pay $9,500 a month for the 5 employees at Three Allen |  |  | Send bill for the Three Allen Center Rent | Net Works | -9500 | [NAME] | [NAME]