Spreadsheet: 13818544-25ef-4a6b-8ca9-27699de0dc87
Sheet: Sheet1

2011-2012 Principal Evaluation Systems | Unnamed: 1 | Unnamed: 2 | Unnamed: 3
Source: Iowa Department of Education; Bureau of Information and Analysis Services; Spring 2012 Basic Educational Data Survey Evaluation File
Disrict | District Name | SAI Performance Review Model | Evaluation Model Description
0009 | AGWSR | Y
0018 | Adair-Casey | Y
0027 | Adel [NAME] | Y
0063 | [NAME] | Y
0072 | [NAME] | N | The principal also serves as the superintendent in the district, and is evaluated by the school board, using the IA-SB instrument.
0081 | Albia | Y
0099 | Alburnett | Y
0108 | Alden | Y
0126 | [NAME] | Y
0135 | Allamakee | N | Iowa Individual Administrator Professional Development Plan (Growth Plan)
0153 | [NAME] | N | na
0171 | Alta | N
0225 | Ames | N | Evaluation based on Iowa Standards for School Leaders, using 6 standards, 33 criteria
0234 | Anamosa | Y
0243 | [NAME] | Y
0261 | Ankeny | Y
0270 | Anthon-Oto | Y
0279 | Aplington-Parkersburg | Y
0333 | Armstrong-Ringsted | Y
0355 | Ar-We-Va | Y
0387 | Atlantic | Y
0414 | Audubon | Y
0423 | Aurelia | Y
0441 | A-H-S-T | Y
0472 | Ballard | Y
0504 | [NAME] Grove | Y
0513 | Baxter | Y
0540 | BCLUW | Y
0549 | Bedford | Y
0576 | [NAME] | N | Evaluation of administrative competencies and use of six (6) administrative standards.
0585 | Bellevue | Y
0594 | Belmond-Klemme | Y
0603 | [NAME] | N
0609 | [NAME] | Y
0621 | Bettendorf | Y
0657 | Eddyville-Blakesburg | Y
0720 | Bondurant-Farrar | Y
0729 | Boone | Y
0747 | Boyden-Hull | Y
0819 | West Hancock | Y
0846 | Brooklyn-Guernsey-Malcom | Y
0873 | North Iowa | N
0882 | Burlington | Y
0914 | CAM | Y
0916 | CAL | Y
0918 | Calamus-Wheatland | Y
0936 | Camanche | Y
0977 | Cardinal | Y
0981 | Carlisle | Y
0999 | Carroll | Y
1044 | [NAME] | N | Principals evaluated against the six Iowa Standards for Schol Leaders. Performance on each standard is rated exceeds/meets/does not meet, with two numeric levels for each rating. No overall rating is provided for the evaluation as a whole.
1044 | [NAME] | N
1053 | Cedar Rapids | N | Minor modifications have been made to the SAI form to fit our school district.
1062 | Center Point-Urbana | Y
1071 | Centerville | Y
1079 | Central Lee | Y | The principal summative evaluation instrument was adopted by the district in July of 2008.  At the time is was recommended by SAI and based on the Iowa Standards for School Leaders
1080 | Central | N
1082 | Central Clinton | N | District-developed evaluation tool including reflection, feedback, and goal setting based on the Iowa Standards for School Leaders
1089 | Central City | Y
1093 | Central Decatur | Y
1095 | Central Lyon | N
1107 | Chariton | Y
1116 | Charles City | N | Administrators create job performance/improvement goals focused around the Leadership Standards the state of Iowa has adopted. The 2-3 goals focus on instructional leadership and improving the quality of instruction/learning in their buildings.
1134 | [NAME] | Y
1152 | Cherokee | Y
1197 | Clarinda | Y
1206 | Clarion-Goldfield | N | The instrument was modeled after the teacher evaluation instrument, using the Principal Standards and [NAME] instead of the Iowa Teaching Standards.
1211 | Clarke | N | District developed portfolio
1215 | [NAME] | Y
1218 | Clay Central-Everly | N | We developed our own evaluation utilizing the six standards, but incorporating additional criteria that principals must meet.
1221 | Clear Creek Amana | N
1224 | Clearfield | Y
1233 | Clear Lake | Y
1278 | [NAME] | N | We developed our own evaluation utilizing the six standards, but incorporating additional criteria that principals must meet.
1332 | Colfax-Mingo | Y
1337 | College | N
1350 | Collins-Maxwell | Y
1359 | Colo-NESCO School | Y
1368 | Columbus | Y
1413 | Coon Rapids-Bayard | Y
1431 | Corning | Y
1449 | Corwith-Wesley | N
1476 | Council Bluffs | N | The system for professional growth includes both a standards based assessment and a personal professional growth plan.  The standards based component of the evaluation aligns with the Iowa Standards for School Leaders.   The system includes three cycles of performance growth.  The Probation Cycle is to be used with principals new to the profession or new to the District.  The Performance Evaluation Cycle is a formal evaluation process, which culminates with a summative evaluation. This cycle is to be used with principals who have successfully completed their probation period with the District.  The Career Development Cycle is less structured and focuses on personal professional growth and development through the completion of challenging professional goals and/or objectives.
1503 | Creston | Y
1576 | Dallas Center-Grimes | N | Used district approved evaluation instrument connected to the ISSL standards.
1602 | Danville | Y
1611 | Davenport | Y
1619 | Davis County | Y
1638 | [NAME] | N
1675 | Delwood | N
1701 | [NAME] | Y
1719 | Denver | Y
1737 | Des Moines Independent | N | Principals were evaluated using the Iowa Standards for School Leaders. This involves an initial license cycle, a career cycle, an individual professional development plan and an assistance phase.
1782 | Diagonal | Y | District developed form
1791 | Dike-New Hartford | N
1854 | Dows | N | Locally developed, using many of the items of the SAI instrument, based on principal standards.  Formative evaluation.
1863 | Dubuque | Y
1908 | Dunkerton | N
1917 | Boyer Valley | Y
1926 | Durant | Y
1944 | Eagle Grove | Y
1953 | [NAME] | Y
1963 | East Buchanan | Y
1965 | East Central | Y
1967 | East Greene | Y
1968 | [NAME] | N | Job descriptions and SAI's procedural format.
1970 | East Union | Y
1972 | Eastern Allamakee | Y
1975 | River Valley | N | The 6 standards and all criteria were used, as well as, the principal's individual goals.
1989 | Edgewood-Colesburg | Y
2007 | Eldora-New Providence | N | Instrument includes self-reflection responses plus observation review with emphasis on the Iowa Administrator [NAME] and Criteria.
2016 | Elk Horn-Kimballton | Y
2088 | Emmetsburg | Y
2097 | English Valleys | Y
2113 | Essex | Y
2124 | [NAME] | N | Based on the Principal Standards and criteria.  The form asks for evidence of meeting the standard and a reflection from both the principal and superintendent.
2151 | Exira | Y
2169 | Fairfield | Y
2205 | Farragut | Y
2295 | Forest City | Y
2313 | Fort Dodge | Y
2322 | [NAME] | Y
2349 | Fredericksburg | Y
2367 | Fremont | Y
2369 | Fremont-Mills | Y
2376 | Galva-Holstein | Y
2403 | Garner-Hayfield | Y
2457 | [NAME] | Y
2466 | [NAME] | Y
2493 | Gilmore City-Bradgate | Y
2502 | Gladbrook-Reinbeck | Y
2511 | Glenwood | Y
2520 | Glidden-Ralston | N
2556 | Graettinger-Terril | N
2673 | Nodaway Valley | Y
2682 | GMG | Y
2709 | Grinnell-Newburg | N
2718 | Griswold | Y
2727 | [NAME] | Y
2754 | [NAME] | Y
2763 | [NAME] | Y
2766 | H-L-V | N | Evaluation of administrative performance in certain categories and use of the six (6) administrative standards,
2772 | Hamburg | Y
2781 | Hampton-Dumont | Y
2826 | Harlan | Y
2834 | Harmony | Y
2846 | Harris-Lake Park | Y
2862 | Hartley-Melvin-Sanborn | Y
2977 | Highland | Y
2988 | Hinton | Y
3029 | [NAME] | Y
3033 | [NAME] | Y
3042 | Hudson | N | Principals were required to write performance goal based on ISSL.  Individual meetings were held with each principal during the course of the school year to monitor progress on their goals.
3060 | Humboldt | Y
3105 | Independence | Y
3114 | Indianola | Y
3119 | Interstate 35 | Y
3141 | Iowa City | N | Principal assessment is based on the Iowa's School Leadership Standards and Criteria with four levels of performance of indicators as developed locally by the district.
3150 | [NAME] | N | The Iowa Falls CSD uses an evaluation instrument with administrative standards provided and mandated by the State of Iowa.
3154 | Iowa Valley | Y
3168 | IKM-Manning | Y
3186 | [NAME] | Y
3195 | Jefferson-Scranton | Y
3204 | Jesup | Y
3231 | Johnston | Y
3312 | Keokuk | Y
3330 | Keota | N
3348 | Kingsley-Pierson | N | The evaluation instrument was established by the school district and incorporates the 6 standards and criteria for school leaders.
3375 | Knoxville | Y
3420 | Lake Mills | Y
3465 | Lamoni | Y
3537 | Laurens-Marathon | Y
3555 | Lawton-Bronson | Y
3600 | Le Mars | N | Distict developed format based upon Iowa Leadership Standards and Criteria
3609 | Lenox | N | Two locally developed instruments were used.  The first measures their performance toward progress on the six Iowa Standards for School Leaders.  The other instrument directly correlates with the district's job description.  Also, accomplishment towards annual individual professional development goals were measured and evaluated.
3645 | [NAME] | Y
3691 | North Cedar | Y
3715 | [NAME] | Y
3744 | Lisbon | Y
3798 | Logan-Magnolia | Y
3816 | Lone Tree | Y
3841 | Louisa-Muscatine | Y
3897 | [NAME] | N
3906 | Lynnville-Sully | N | Utilize school district evaluation instrument modified from SAI's Principal Performance Review Form.  [NAME] is evaluated on each standard.  Under each standard, the principal is evaluated on evidence/artifact, areas to improve, and an summary rating (Meets Standard or Doesn't Meet Standard).  After evaluation feedback on six leadership standards, there is an overall summary narrative.
3942 | Madrid | Y
3978 | East Mills | Y
4023 | [NAME] | N | Used SAI form for identifying target areas and PD.
4033 | Maple Valley | Y
4041 | Maquoketa | Y
4043 | [NAME] | Y
4068 | Marcus-Meriden-Cleghorn | Y
4086 | Marion Independent | Y
4104 | Marshalltown | Y
4122 | Martensdale-St Marys | Y
4131 | Mason City | Y
4149 | MOC-Floyd Valley | Y
4203 | Mediapolis | Y
4212 | Melcher-Dallas | N
4269 | Midland | Y
4271 | Mid-Prairie | Y
4356 | Missouri Valley | Y
4419 | MFL MarMac | Y
4437 | Montezuma | Y
4446 | Monticello | Y
4491 | Moravia | Y
4505 | [NAME] | Y
4509 | [NAME] | N
4518 | Moulton-Udell | Y
4527 | Mount Ayr | Y
4536 | Mount Pleasant | Y
4554 | Mount Vernon | Y
4572 | [NAME] | Y
4581 | Muscatine | N | The Muscatine Community School District (“MCSD”) expects that all principals will be committed to ongoing professional development and continuous professional growth.  The system for professional growth includes both a standards based assessment and personal processional growth plan.  The standards based component of the evaluation aligns with the Iowa Standards for School Leaders.  The system includes three cycles of performance growth.  The Probation Cycle will be used with principals new to the profession or new to MCSD.  The Performance Evaluation Cycle is a formal evaluation process which culminates with a summative evaluation.  The Performance Evaluation Cycle is to be used with principals who have successfully completed their probation period with MCSD.  The Career Development Cycle is less structured and focuses on personal professional growth and development through the completion of challenging professional goals and/or objectives.  This cycle is used with non-probationary principals in the intervening years between formal summative evaluation periods.
4599 | [NAME] | Y
4617 | Nevada | N
4644 | Newell-Fonda | Y
4662 | New Hampton | Y
4689 | New London | Y
4725 | Newton | Y
4772 | Central Springs | Y
4773 | Northeast | N
4774 | North Fayette | N | Checklist based on 6 standards for educaitonal leaders
4775 | Northeast [NAME] | Y
4776 | North Mahaska | Y
4777 | [NAME] | Y
4778 | North Kossuth | Y
4779 | North Polk | Y
4784 | North Scott | Y
4785 | North Tama County | Y
4787 | North Winneshiek | N
4788 | Northwood-Kensett | Y
4797 | Norwalk | Y
4860 | Odebolt-Arthur | Y
4869 | Oelwein | Y | Each principal wrote a reflection based upon the six Iowa Administrator Standards.  I responded to their reflections with a narrative critique of their performance based upon the standards.
4878 | Ogden | N | The district utilized its own form; however the evaluation instrument incorporated many of the evaluation criteria that is found on the SAI Principal Performance Review Form.
4890 | [NAME] | Y
4905 | [NAME] | Y
4978 | Orient-Macksburg | Y
4995 | Osage | Y
5013 | Oskaloosa | Y
5049 | Ottumwa | N
5121 | Panorama | Y
5139 | Paton-Churdan | N | District form.
5160 | PCM | Y
5163 | [NAME] | Y
5166 | [NAME] | Y
5184 | [NAME] | N
5250 | Pleasant Valley | Y
5256 | Pleasantville | Y
5283 | Pocahontas Area | Y
5301 | Pomeroy-Palmer | Y
5310 | Postville | Y
5325 | Prairie Valley | Y
5328 | Prescott | Y
5337 | Preston | N
5463 | [NAME] | Y
5486 | Remsen-Union | N
5508 | Riceville | N
5510 | Riverside | Y
5607 | Rock Valley | N | Evaluation form has 3 major areas:  Administrative Functions, Professionals Characteristics, and Personal Characteristics.  Each is broken down into 3 to 8 differenct categories with each category have criteria to evaluate.  Criterial is similar to that included in SAI's form.
5625 | Rockwell City-Lytton | Y
5643 | [NAME] | Y
5697 | Rudd-Rockford-Marble Rk | Y
5724 | Ruthven-Ayrshire | Y
5751 | [NAME] | Y
5805 | Saydel | Y
5823 | Schaller-Crestland | N | Iowa Administrative Professioanl Dvelopment Plan and Smart GOal Evaluation-In district
5832 | Schleswig | Y
5868 | Sentral | N
5877 | [NAME] | Y
5895 | [NAME] | Y
5922 | West Fork CSD | Y
5949 | Sheldon | Y
5976 | Shenandoah | Y
5994 | Sibley-Ocheyedan | N | Annual review of performance using a written documentation.
6003 | Sidney | Y
6012 | [NAME] | Y
6030 | Sioux Center | Y
6035 | Sioux Central | N
6039 | Sioux City | Y
6091 | Southern Cal | N
6093 | Solon | Y
6094 | Southeast Warren | N
6095 | [NAME] | N | Written comments and Mid-Year Conference.  The written comments were based on each of the Iowa Administrator's Standards.  As of the time Spring BEDS were submitted, the end of the year summative evaluations have not taken place.
6096 | Southeast [NAME] | Y
6097 | South Page | Y
6098 | South Tama County | Y
6099 | [NAME] | Y
6100 | South Winneshiek | N | [NAME] of Dubuque Evaluation based on ISSL standards
6101 | Southeast Polk | Y
6102 | [NAME] | Y
6120 | [NAME] | Y
6138 | Springville | Y
6165 | Stanton | Y
6175 | Starmont | Y
6219 | Storm Lake | Y
6246 | [NAME] | Y
6264 | West Central Valley | Y
6273 | Sumner | Y
6408 | Tipton | N | We use the SAI form every other year and use a goal setting procedure during this year with a summative evaluation in May.
6417 | [NAME] | Y
6453 | Treynor | Y
6460 | Tri-Center | Y
6462 | Tri-County | Y | Iowa Standards for School Leaders
6471 | Tripoli | N
6509 | Turkey Valley | Y
6512 | Twin Cedars | Y
6516 | [NAME] | Y
6534 | Underwood | N | The principals' evaluation form uses a narrative format.  It includes the six Iowa Standards for School Leaders, goals shared with the board of education, and general performance characteristics important to the principalship.
6536 | Union | Y
6561 | United | N | Combined Principal/Superintendent position.  [NAME]. 3 Superintendent Evaluation from IASB
6579 | Urbandale | N | 1.	The Urbandale Administrative Evaluation Tool is based on work from the following sources: a.	Iowa Standards for School Leadership b.	School Administrators of Iowa  - Administrative Performance Standards i.	Cross-referenced in the summative evaluation tool c.	McRel’s Balanced Leadership:  School Leadership that Works – Leadership responsibilities d.	The Learning Leader – Leadership concepts e.	The Urbandale Principal Evaluation Plan (1994) – Leadership criteria and descriptors f.	Metro area administrative evaluation plans g.	Interviews with/feedback from Urbandale district administrative members  2.	The Evaluation Tool is broken into two distinct, but related components: a.	Common Administrative Criteria (each with individual descriptors, not included here) i.	Management ii.	Leadership iii.	Relationship Building iv.	School and Community v.	Communication vi.	Professional Responsibilities vii.	Ethical Conduct b.	Job-Specific Criteria, based on job responsibilities specific to each of the following administrative positions: i.	Principals ii.	Activities Director iii.	Director of Business Services iv.	Curriculum Director v.	Director of Student Services vi.	Director of Human Resources vii.	Coordinator of Instructional Support viii.	Coordinator of Special Education  3.	Administrator performance is rated on the following scale: a.	Meets district expectations b.	Does not meet district expectations c.	Not observed
6591 | Valley | Y
6592 | [NAME] | Y
6615 | [NAME] | Y
6633 | Ventura | N
6651 | Villisca | Y
6660 | Vinton-Shellsburg | Y
6700 | [NAME] | N
6741 | East Sac County | Y
6750 | Walnut | Y
6759 | Wapello | Y
6762 | Wapsie Valley | N
6768 | Washington | Y
6795 | [NAME] | Y
6822 | [NAME] | N
6840 | Waverly-Shell Rock | Y
6854 | Wayne | N | Professional Growth Plan for each [NAME] with action steps and documentation.  Reviewed regularly with [NAME], with final review at end of year.
6867 | Webster City | Y
6921 | West Bend-Mallard | Y
6930 | West Branch | Y
6937 | West Burlington Ind | N | Criteria -based on administrartive standards
6943 | West Central | Y
6950 | West Delaware County | Y
6957 | West Des Moines | Y
6961 | Western Dubuque | Y
6969 | [NAME] | N | Combination Superintendent/Principal done using SAI superintendent form
6975 | West Liberty | Y
6983 | West Lyon | Y
6985 | [NAME] | Y
6987 | West Monona | Y
6990 | West Sioux | Y
6992 | Westwood | N | checklist and ratings with comments
7002 | Whiting | Y
7029 | Williamsburg | Y
7038 | [NAME] | Y
7047 | Winfield-Mt Union | N | Educational Leader Standards
7056 | Winterset | Y
7083 | Woden-Crystal Lake | N
7092 | Woodbine | Y
7098 | [NAME] | Y
7110 | [NAME] | Y