Spreadsheet: 58420895-405a-4838-88aa-ff6b249d55a9
Sheet: Sheet1

TABLE D: State of Ohio 2003-2004 and 2005-2006 and 2007-2008 School Year Report Card Comparison | Unnamed: 1 | Unnamed: 2 | Unnamed: 3 | Unnamed: 4 | Unnamed: 5 | Unnamed: 6 | Unnamed: 7 | Unnamed: 8 | Unnamed: 9 | Unnamed: 10 | Unnamed: 11
 |  | Adequate    Yearly      Progress | Designation &                                                                                                                                      Performance Indicator Score (0 – 120 points with 100 being the goal) |  |  |  |  | Indicators | Graduation      Rate
 |  | M    = Met          NM =  Not Met | Excellent | Effective | [NAME] | Academic Watch | Academic Emergency | Met out of       18      25     30 | Ohio Average      84.3   86.2   86.9
County | School District | 03-     05-      07-    04      06       08 | 03-   05-     07-    04     06     08 | 03-   05-     07-    04     06     08 | 03-   05-     07-    04     06     08 | 03-   05-     07-    04     06     08 | 03-   05-    07-    04     06     08 | 03-   05-    07-    04     06     08 | 03-     05-      07-      04      06     08
Cosh | Coshocton City | M       M     M |  | 93.3-98.1-96.0 |  |  |  | 15      22     22 | 92.5  97.1   95.7
Cosh | Ridgewood Local | M     NM   NM | --   101.5 | 91.7    --     98.0 |  |  |  | 14      22     27 | 82.6  93.2   95.5
Cosh | River View Local | NM  NM   M | --  99.0    99.0 | 93.1 |  |  |  | 14      24     28 | 86.9  93.3   93.2
Guer | Cambridge City | NM  NM   NM |  |  | --   88.8  87.5 | 79.3 |  | 7      13      10 | 80.5  78.1   91.4
Guer | East Guernsey Local | M     NM   NM |  | 90.3-97.8-96.1 |  |  |  | 13      20     27 | 91.2  87.0   91.4
Guer | Rolling Hills Local | NM  NM   NM |  |  | 84.8-89.7-88.9 |  |  | 8       11     11 | 89.1  89.7   78.9
Morg | Morgan Local | NM  NM   NM |  | --     96.5  93.4 | 85.9 |  |  | 6      20    18 | 84.5  92.6   90.2
Musk | [NAME] | NM  NM    M |  | 91.8  99.1  99.5 |  |  |  | 14       21    27 | 95.3  98.3   90.2
Musk | [NAME] | NM   M     NM |  | --    93.3  90.4 | 85 |  |  | 9       14    15 | 90.1  87.1   95.6
Musk | Maysville Local | M     NM   NM |  | --    93.6   92.7 | 79.3 |  |  | 9       14     18 | 91.6  85.2   91.7
Musk | Tri-Valley Local | NM  NM    M | 97.7 |  | 88.0  95.3  --- |  |  | 11        22    26 | 94.7  95.3   94.2
Musk | [NAME] | NM  NM   NM | --   99.2 | 90.7  --      97.3 |  |  |  | 13       25    27 | 99.3  100   98.5
Musk | Zanesville City | NM  NM   NM |  |  | 80.2-89.6-86.5 |  |  | 5         9      7 | 80.4  91.3   97.4
Noble | [NAME] | M      M     NM |  | --    94.6  94.3 | 84.1 |  |  | 9       17    24 | 91.7  88.2   84.1
Noble | Noble Local | M     NM   NM | ---    ---   91.1 | --    93.6    --- | 89 |  |  | 10       21     19 | 100  93.6   94.4
[NAME] | [NAME] | M      M     NM |  | --   93.0    91.3 | 80.5 |  |  | 10       13     16 | 89.2  90.1   98.6
[NAME] | New Lexington City | NM  NM   NN |  | --  90.6    90.8 | 81.4 |  |  | 5       14     17 | 74.8  77.9   85.4
[NAME] | Northern Local | M     NM    M | 100.2 | --  98.9    97.2 |  |  |  | 17       23    25 | 85.1  90.1    90.5
[NAME] | Southern Local | NM  NM    NM |  |  | 80.2-84.1-88.8 |  |  | 3        7     12 | 92.4  93.8   94.9
TO-TALS | 19 School Districts | M  =8    =4   =5       NM=11=15 =14 | 1        3        3 | 6      11       11 | 11        5        5 | 1        0         0 | 0        0         0