Spreadsheet: 09d8e5f9-0a3a-48de-95be-60e47113be88
Sheet: Sheet1

Unnamed: 0 | Unnamed: 1 | UDOT Categorical Exclusion Reviewer QC Checklist
 | Section | Question
 | Title/Signature | Has the project been properly categorized? Is the (c) or (d) list description appropriate for the project as it is described in the CE?
 |  | Has someone who is not the preparer (or the Region Environmental Manager/Engineer) reviewed the document and signed and dated the title/signature page as the reviewer?
 |  | Has the Region Environmental Manager/Engineer reviewed the document and signed and dated as the approver?
 | Purpose & Need | Does the P&N section clearly describe the transportation problems/deficiencies in the project area (e.g., congestion, safety, traffic, unsafe geometries, lack of trail facilities)? Can it answer the question: why is this project necessary?
 |  | Does the P&N section describe a solution? If YES, please revise so that this information is included in the Description section.
 | Description | Does the Description section clearly & accurately describe what actions are proposed with this project?
 |  | Does the Description section detail the length and location of the project? (E.g., Project activities will occur on approximately 2.4 miles of I-15, between MP 303.1 and 305.5).
 |  | Are any referenced maps, typical sections, etc. included in the [NAME] or as an attachment?
 |  | Do the proposed actions detailed in the Description section address the identified needs for the project? Are there any needs that are not addressed by this project?
 | Public Involvment | Was a public meeting needed for this project? Public meetings are needed for projects that add additional through travel lanes, substantially change the layout of the facility or result in substantial adverse impacts.
 |  | If there were public meetings or hearings, are the comments summarized and included in an Appendix or attachment?
 |  | If comments were received, have the comments been addressed? Is a typed response to the comments included in an Appendix or attachment?
 |  | If a public hearing was held, is a copy of the public hearing transcript and certification of public hearing attached?
 | Right of Way | If there are right-of-way impacts, are the number of parcels and number of acres summarized in the comment section? (E.g., 5 partial takes and 0.25 acres of right-of-way are required).
 | Cultural | Are all of the appropriate clearance memos from the Region Archaeologist, [NAME], [NAME] and Native American consultation letters included in an Appendix or Attachment?
 |  | If necessary, is the signed MOA attached?
 |  | Are any mitigation measures included in the project commitments?
 | Paleontological | Is the appropriate memo from the UGS or the UDOT Region Archaeologist attached?
 |  | Are any mitigation measures included in the project commitments?
 | T&E Species | For projects that have No Affect on T&E Species, is a clearance memo from UDOT's Wildlife Biologist attached?
 |  | If a Section 7 consultation was required (projects with affects on T&E species), is there a written concurrence memo from the USF&WS attached?
 |  | Are any mitigation measures included in the project commitments?
 | Wildlife | Is the memo from UDOT"s Wildlife Biologist attached?
 |  | Are any mitigation measures included in the project commitments?
 | Noise | Was a noise study necessary?
 |  | If YES, is the noise study attached?
 |  | Does it reflect the newest policy (January 15, 2008)?
 |  | Are any mitigation measures included in the project commitments?
 | Wetlands, Water | If NO is the answer for the first question, is the Landscape Architect memo or Army Corps of Engineers letter attached?
 |  | Are any stream alteration conditions or 404 permit conditions included or referenced in the project commitments?
 | Air Quality | If YES is the answer to the 2nd question, has the air quality supplement been completed?
 |  | If YES is the answer to the 2nd question, are the applicable CO or PM10 analyses attached?
 | Relocations | If YES is the answer to the question, are the number and the addresses of the relocations listed in the comment box? If there are a lot, this could be an attachment/appendix item.
 | Section 4(f) | If deminimis, are the SHPO or government official with jurisdiction concurrence letters attached?
 |  | If deminimis impact and not historical, has UDOT Environmental Services concurred with the deminimis finding? Is the concurrence letter attached?
 |  | If there is an Individual or Programmatic 4(f) evaluation, is the Individual or Programmatic 4(f) evaluation attached? Is UDOT Environmental Services written concurrence attached?
 | Mitigation Commitments | Have all applicable mitigation commitments described in the CE, clearance memos or technical studies been entered into ePM's project commitments? Check the Project Commitments page.
 |  | Has the Region Project Manager or District Engineer seen and agreed with all of the listed mitigation commitments?