Spreadsheet: 23968cd8-cbed-4361-ba90-3f1e53f66ca0
Sheet: Sheet1

1. Description of the measure | 2. Energy savings | Unnamed: 2 | Unnamed: 3 | 3. Inc. price | 4. units & capacity | 5. Market description | 6. Market size, 2030 | 7. Site energy use (TBTUs), 2030 | 8. Source energy use (TBTUs), 2030 | 9. Economic potential (TBTUs), 2030 | 10. CCE ($/ MMBTU) | 11. Lifetime (years) | Primary source | Quote | Conclusion | Other supporting sources
R: insulating shutters | 0.6744259844605911 | P |  | 1480 | per home; 15 windows: $72/ window plus one day to install | R: Heating and cooling lost through windows (conduction) in all homes | 141.343629 | 1553.323852028544 | 2268.742211323854 | 1579.225241802869 | 6.278475540114495 | 20 | Synertech Systems Corporation, "Windows and Insulating Shutters" (2007) [NAME], "Baby, it's warm inside, thanks to insulated shutters", San Francisco Chronicle, 1/19/2008 | Increases R-value for window assembly to [NAME] when closed; assume only closed at night for 60% heating loss reduction | Increases R-value for window assembly to [NAME] when closed; assume only closed at night for 60% heating loss reduction
R:  R-10 windows | 0.8138780754356735 | P |  | 5687.04 | per home; 192 sq.ft. glazing | R: Heating and cooling lost through windows (conduction) in all homes | 141.343629 | 1553.323852028544 | 1720.593162111396 | 816.5011050581793 | 30.1667818222166 | 30 | 6. Apte, J. & Arasteh, D. Window-Related Energy Consumption in the US Residential and Commercial Building Stock. Buildings 1-38 (Berkeley, CA, 2006). | See tables 4 and 7 for use and savings | Calculated from first principles; costs from NREL bottom-up BIG build,
R: R-5 repl. Windows | 0.6277561508713468 | P |  | 973.44 | per home | R: Heating and cooling lost through windows (conduction) in all homes | 141.343629 | 1553.323852028544 | 1798.880000108668 | 695.962677230892 | 6.271504442801517 | 40 | 6. Apte, J. & Arasteh, D. Window-Related Energy Consumption in the US Residential and Commercial Building Stock. Buildings 1-38 (Berkeley, CA, 2006). | See tables 4 and 7 for use and savings | Results taken directly from "Quote" column
R: window attachments | 0.4815657072597266 | P |  | 800.8000000000002 | per home; 14 windows/home | R: Heating and cooling lost through windows that can benefit from attachments | 70.6718145 | 917.8828726686437 | 1360.516187854953 | 644.564058499717 | 5.65484990588838 | 10 | Savings: first principles calculation from R- and SHGC- impacts of product Price: Comfortex | Savings: adding R_value of 1.75 and reducing SHGC to 0.35 Price: Comfortex current prices compressed 1/3rd to represent learning curve | Results taken directly from "Quote" column
R: low-e storms | 0.5769307628256748 | P |  | 1500 | per home; 10 storms/home | R: Heating and cooling lost through windows in existing homes with with single pane glass | 47.48071667857143 | 563.2023916807094 | 834.7971116319613 | 481.6201344184975 | 4.80974071494759 | 30 | Kohler, C Letter report for low-e storm window retrofits, 2006 | ...using pyrolitic “hard” low-e coatings... the energy savings from a storm window retrofit will increase from approximately 15% of the home’s heating energy to 18%.... the cost premium for installed low-e window is on the order of $100 | 18% of home heating/ cooling is 58% of window load heating/cooling
C: low-e storms | 0.5769307628256748 | P |  | 0.36 | per square foot; wall: floor space of .9, window fill ratio of 0.4 | C: Heating and cooling lost through buildings with single pain windows (expressed in primary energy) | 55090.65761000001 | 734.4152702060844 | 734.4152702060844 | 423.7067620708203 | 1.721740459091257 | 40 | Kohler, C Letter report for low-e storm window retrofits, 2006 | ...using pyrolitic “hard” low-e coatings... the energy savings from a storm window retrofit will increase from approximately 15% of the home’s heating energy to 18%.... the cost premium for installed low-e window is on the order of $100 | 18% of home heating/ cooling is 58% of window load heating/cooling
C:  R-10 windows | 0.838709677419355 | P |  | 10.6632 | per square foot; wall: floor space of .9, window fill ratio of 0.4 | C: Heating and cooling lost through windows (conduction) in all buildings | 103944.637 | 732.166152 | 735.5724010634443 | 304.4489331233504 | 104.8831502989652 | 40 | 6. Apte, J. & Arasteh, D. Window-Related Energy Consumption in the US Residential and Commercial Building Stock. Buildings 1-38 (Berkeley, CA, 2006). | See tables 4 and 7 for use and savings | Results taken directly from "Quote" column | [NAME], [NAME]; [NAME], [NAME]; [NAME], [NAME]; [NAME], [NAME].  Energy Impacts of Today’ s Window Stock
C: window attachments | 0.5544386966589067 | P |  | 0.5124000000000001 | per square foot; 14 windows / 3000 sq.ft. | C: Heating and cooling lost through windows that can benefit from attachments | 51972.31850000001 | 530.026114818542 | 811.2261907526771 | 283.3844667940114 | 3.166238284957208 | 40 | Savings: first principles calculation from R- and SHGC- impacts of product Price: Comfortex | Savings: adding R_value of 1.75 and reducing SHGC to 0.35 Price: Comfortex current prices compressed 1/3rd to represent learning curve | Results taken directly from "Quote" column
C: R-5 repl. Windows | 0.6774193548387096 | P |  | 1.8252 | per square foot | C: Heating and cooling lost through windows (conductive) in all buildings | 103944.637 | 732.166152 | 764.6565389779475 | 260.8780392204546 | 20.14451777949344 | 40 | 6. Apte, J. & Arasteh, D. Window-Related Energy Consumption in the US Residential and Commercial Building Stock. Buildings 1-38 (Berkeley, CA, 2006). | See tables 4 and 7 for use and savings | Results taken directly from "Quote" column | [NAME], [NAME]; [NAME], [NAME]; [NAME], [NAME]; [NAME], [NAME].  Energy Impacts of Today’ s Window Stock
C: exist. Dynamic windows | 0.44375 | P | FS | 4.320000000000001 | per square foot; wall: floor space of .9, window fill ratio of 0.4 | C: Cooling lost through windows (radiative) in existing buildings | 103944.637 | 269.8914459999999 | 911.8883550815968 | 225.9621888957361 | 50.84365746399288 | 40 | [NAME], E.S., Yazdanian, M. & Selkowitz, [NAME] The Energy-Savings Potential of Electrochromic Windows in the US Commercial Buildings Sector. Building 1-42 (2004). Cost: Personal communication - manufacturers and experts | ~95 TBTUs savings at 40% market penetration | Results taken directly from "Quote" column | Arasteh, D.; Selkowitz, S.;  [NAME], J.; "Zero Energy Windows"; 2006 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings
C: window films | 0.5945945945945946 | P |  | 0.81 | per square foot; wall: floor space of .9, window fill ratio of 0.4 | C: Heating and cooling lost through non-low-e windows (radiative) in existing buildings | 19519.25030000384 | 43.45429236449951 | 132.5719740782424 | 78.82657918165766 | 8.710318020558763 | 40 | [NAME], J. Computer Simulation Analysis of the Energy Impact of Window Films In Existing Houses Selkowitx, S. Personal communication | Tables 12-16 used to generate estimate of population average Simplified to SHGF and used vs. existing baseline | Improving SHGF from 0.74 to 0.30 on windows incuring the greatest load
R: window films, hot climates | 0.4697130712008503 | P |  | 432 | per home; 192 sq.ft. of windows | R: All cooling in homes in hot climates | 16.95040609310448 | 51.33767902258322 | 156.6229037980888 | 75.54075129397778 | 3.478497371898476 | 30 | [NAME], J. Computer Simulation Analysis of the Energy Impact of Window Films In Existing Houses Selkowitx, S. Personal communication | Tables 12-16 used to generate estimate of population average Simplified to SHGF and used vs. existing baseline | Improving SHGF from 0.74 to 0.30 on windows incuring the greatest load
C: New dynamic windows | 0.44375 | P |  | 2.520000000000001 | per square foot; wall: floor space of .9, window fill ratio of 0.4 | C: Cooling lost through windows (radiative) in new buildings | 50965.90779999987 | 132.3325854016368 | 132.3325854016368 | 47.30489536369576 | 124.8166128842205 | 40 | [NAME], E.S., Yazdanian, M. & Selkowitz, [NAME] The Energy-Savings Potential of Electrochromic Windows in the US Commercial Buildings Sector. Building 1-42 (2004). Cost: Personal communication - manufacturers and experts | ~95 TBTUs savings at 40% market penetration | Results taken directly from "Quote" column | Arasteh, D.; Selkowitz, S.;  [NAME], J.; "Zero Energy Windows"; 2006 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings
R: Exist. Dynamic windows | 0.4204569606801275 | P |  | 2304 | per square foot; wall: floor space of .9, window fill ratio of 0.4 | R: Heating and [NAME] lost through windows (radiative) in existing homes | 102.266159 | 213.0513624787001 | 213.0513624787001 | 45.29403816354306 | 114.8610475345824 | 30 | Arasteh, D.; Selkowitz, S.;  [NAME], J.; "Zero Energy Windows"; 2006 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings | Table 4; baseline updated to 2010 stock | Results taken directly from "Quote" column | [NAME], E.S., Yazdanian, M. & Selkowitz, [NAME] The Energy-Savings Potential of Electrochromic Windows in the US Commercial Buildings Sector. Building 1-42 (2004). Cost: Personal communication - manufacturers and experts
R: New dynamic windows | 0.4204569606801275 | P |  | 1344 | per square foot; wall: floor space of .9, window fill ratio of 0.4 | R: Heating and [NAME] lost through windows (radiative) in new homes | 4.102284 | 69.3905308300439 | 69.3905308300439 | 25.15449074689272 | 12.36026102412569 | 30 | Arasteh, D.; Selkowitz, S.;  [NAME], J.; "Zero Energy Windows"; 2006 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings | Table 4; adjusted for new building codes | Results taken directly from "Quote" column | [NAME], E.S., Yazdanian, M. & Selkowitz, [NAME] The Energy-Savings Potential of Electrochromic Windows in the US Commercial Buildings Sector. Building 1-42 (2004). Cost: Personal communication - manufacturers and experts