Spreadsheet: 146924d1332425961-using-a-shape-in-a-formula-copy-of-harvey-balls
Sheet: Legend

Capability Interface Assessment  (as of March 20, 2012)
 | This spreadsheet presents capability-level assessments of the:         1) the extent to which the interfaces associated with a capability adhere to the current Interface Balance and Control (IBC) standard;      2) anticipated impacts of interface failures from a Brand, Revenue and Operations perspective;       3) probability of future interface failure, and       4) the relative priority for remediation       The assessment is organized by capability and businesss unit.  Presented below is a description of the symbols that appear on the following tabs:
 | Adherence to Current IBC Standard
 |  | The extent to which all interfaces associated with a capability adhere to current IBC standard.
 |  | 1 | Most / all interfaces comply with the current IBC standard
 |  | 2 | The majority of interfaces comply with the current IBC standard
 |  | 3 | Some of the interfaces comply with the current IBC standard
 |  | 4 | Few if any of the interfaces comply with the IBC standard
 | Brand Impact (risk to future revenue)
 |  | The anticipated brand impacts should critical interfaces associated with the capability fail.  It is important to note that brand impact is scored independent of adherence to the IBC Standard.
 |  | 1 | Interface failure is not likely to impact to the brand
 |  | 2 | Interface failure has the potential to have a slight  impact on the brand; unlikely to receive media coverage
 |  | 3 | Interface failure has the potential to have a moderate impact on the brand; might receive media coverage
 |  | 4 | interface failure has the potential to have a significant  impact  on the brand; likely to receive media coverage
 | Revenue Impact  (risk to current revenue)
 |  | The anticipated revenue impacts should critical interfaces associated with the capability fail.  It is important to note that revenue impact is scored independent of adherence to the IBC Standard.
 |  | 1 | Interface failure is not likely to impact current revenue
 |  | 2 | Interface failure has the potential to have a slight  impact on current revenue
 |  | 3 | Interface failure has the potential to have a moderate impact on current revenue
 |  | 4 | interface failure has the potential to have a significant  impact on current revenue
 | Operations  Impact  (risk to business operations)
 |  | The anticipated impacts to business operations should critical interfaces associated with the capability fail.  It is important to note that operations impact is scored independent of adherence to the IBC Standard.
 |  | 1 | Interface failure is not likely to disrupt business operations
 |  | 2 | Interface failure has the potential to cause minor / isolated disruptions to business operations
 |  | 3 | Interface failure has the potential to create moderate disruptions to business operations; service recoveries
 |  | 4 | interface failure has the potential to create significant   disruptions to business operations
 | Probability of Future Failure
 |  | A score which predicts the future probability of important interfaces failing and trigger recoveries, outages, data clean up activities, etc.  The score is subjective and is determined by considering historical interface issues, interface remediation efforts, and the presence of manual business controls.
 |  | 1 | Unlikely  - The chance of important  interfaces failing is judged to be very low
 |  | 2 | Low Probability
 |  | 3 | Medium Probability
 |  | 4 | Likely -  The chance of important interfaces failing is relatively high
 | Relative Priority
 |  | The relative importance of remediating interfaces associated with a capability.   This score is derived by combining the Adherence to IBC Standard score with the Brand, Revenue and Operations impact scores.
 |  | 1 | No bars - lowest priority for remediation
 |  | 2 | One bar
 |  | 4 | Two bars
 |  | 6 | Three bars
 |  | 8 | Five bars - highest priority for remediation