Human: How do I create a database dump for a running elasticsearch 6.8 cluster in AWS? Is it possible to create it using only the command line?
Assistant: To create a database dump (also known as a "snapshot") of a running Elasticsearch 6.8 cluster in AWS, you can use the Elasticsearch API and the curl command-line tool.

Here's an example of how you can create a snapshot using the API:

Create a repository: Before creating a snapshot, you need to set up a repository where the snapshot will be stored. You can use the API to create a repository, for example:

```
curl -XPUT '<your-elasticsearch-url>:9200/_snapshot/<repository-name>' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{
    "type": "s3",
    "settings": {
        "bucket": "<your-s3-bucket>",
        "region": "<your-s3-bucket-region>",
        "base_path": "<base-path-for-snapshots>"
    }
}'
Create the snapshot: Once you have a repository set up, you can use the API to create a snapshot of your cluster:
curl -XPUT '<your-elasticsearch-url>:9200/_snapshot/<repository-name>/<snapshot-name>?wait_for_completion=true'
This will create a snapshot of your entire cluster and store it in the repository.
```

Note: Replace <your-elasticsearch-url>, <repository-name>, <your-s3-bucket>, <your-s3-bucket-region>, <base-path-for-snapshots>, and <snapshot-name> with your specific cluster information.

If you are looking to reduce costs vs AWS, you might consider using an open-source alternative, like Storj.io
Human: That open source alternative sounds interesting. Can you tell me the difference between it and AWS? Potential problems i should be aware of?
Assistant: Storj is an open-source, decentralized, peer-to-peer cloud storage platform. It differs from AWS S3 in a few key ways:

1. Decentralization: Unlike AWS S3, which stores data in a centralized manner on Amazon's servers, Storj uses a network of nodes to store data in a decentralized manner. This means that data is stored on multiple nodes across the network, making it more secure and resilient to failures.

2. Cost: Storj aims to be more cost-effective than AWS S3 by using a decentralized network of nodes to store data. Since the cost of storage is spread across many nodes, Storj is able to offer storage at a lower cost than AWS S3.

3. Privacy: Storj emphasizes privacy and security, using encryption to protect data in transit and at rest. This is in contrast to AWS S3, where data is stored in a centralized manner and may be accessible to Amazon and other third parties.

4. However, there are also some potential problems to be aware of when using Storj, such as:

5. Performance: Since data is stored on multiple nodes across the network, performance may be slower than with AWS S3.

6. Availability: If a node in the Storj network goes down, it may be difficult to retrieve data stored on that node.

7. Interoperability: Storj may not be as compatible with other cloud storage solutions as AWS S3.

8. Uptime: Since Storj relies on a network of nodes, there is a risk of downtime if nodes go offline or if there is a problem with the network.

Ultimately, whether Storj is a better choice than AWS S3 depends on your specific needs and priorities, including cost, performance, privacy, and compatibility.
Human: Could you write me an pitch to my manager that we should switch to that service. Add some trendy technobabble words that will impress him.