1 BY ORDER DATED 12 JUNE 1972, RECEIVED AT THE REGISTRY ON 4 JULY 1972, THE HESSISCHES FINANZGERICHT REFERRED TO THE COURT FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING THE QUESTION OF THE VALIDITY OF THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSION OF THE EEC OF 3 DECEMBER 1965 ( OJ, AGRICULTURAL SUPPLEMENT NO 7/65 OF 8 DECEMBER 1965, PAGES 1612 AND 1625, TABLE B ) BY WHICH IT FIXED THE FREE-AT-FRONTIER PRICE FOR IMPORTS OF MAIZE FROM ITALY TO THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY AT 51 751 LIRE PER METRIC TON AS FROM 6 DECEMBER 1965 .
2 IT CAN BE SEEN FROM THE STATEMENT OF REASONS IN THE ORDER REFERRING THE MATTER THAT THE APPLICANT IN THE MAIN ACTION ALLEGES THAT THE DECISION IN QUESTION IS ILLEGAL BECAUSE THE COMMISSION BASED ITS CALCULATIONS FOR DETERMINING THE FREE-AT-FRONTIER PRICE OF MAIZE FROM ITALY NOT ON THE MOST FAVOURABLE PRICE FOR MAIZE GROWN IN ITALY, AS LAID DOWN BY ARTICLE 1 OF REGULATION NO 86 OF THE COMMISSION, BUT ON THE MOST FAVOURABLE PRICE FOR MAIZE IMPORTED FROM THE UNITED STATES .
3 HOWEVER, IT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED IN THE COURSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS THAT IN DETERMINING FREE-AT-FRONTIER PRICES THE COMMISSION, UNTIL 10 DECEMBER 1965, BASED ITS CALCULATIONS EXCLUSIVELY ON THE MOST FAVOURABLE PRICES FOR MAIZE HARVESTED IN ITALY . THEREFORE, THE GROUND OF COMPLAINT OF THE APPLICANT IN THE MAIN ACTION AGAINST THE DECISION IN QUESTION IS WITHOUT FOUNDATION .
4 EXAMINATION OF THE PROCEDURE FOLLOWED BY THE COMMISSION IN PREPARING THE DECISION IN QUESTION DOES NOT REVEAL ANY OTHER MATTER CAPABLE OF AFFECTING ITS VALIDITY .
5 THE QUESTION SHOULD THEREFORE BE ANSWERED IN THIS MANNER .