1. By application lodged at the Court Registry on 22 May 1995, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EC Treaty for a declaration that, by not adopting or by not communicating to the Commission within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment (OJ 1991 L 135, p. 40), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and that directive.
2. Article 19(1) of Directive 91/271 provides that the Member States are to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with that directive not later than 30 June 1993 and immediately to inform the Commission thereof. Article 19(3) requires the Member States also to communicate to the Commission the texts of the main provisions adopted.
3. Since the Commission received no notification of implementing measures adopted by the Hellenic Republic and possessed no other information to support a conclusion that that Member State had fulfilled its obligations in that respect, it gave the Greek Government formal notice, by letter of 9 August 1993, to submit its observations within two months, in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 169 of the Treaty.
4. Since it received no reply to its letter, the Commission sent a reasoned opinion to the Hellenic Republic on 25 May 1994 calling upon it to adopt within two months the measures required to comply with that opinion. In the absence of any response from the Greek authorities to the reasoned opinion, and forming the view that the Greek Government had failed to adopt within the period prescribed the measures necessary to comply with its obligations, the Commission brought the present proceedings.
5. Referring to Article 19 of Directive 91/271 and also to the first paragraph of Article 5 and the third paragraph of Article 189 of the Treaty, the Commission maintains in its application that the Hellenic Republic was under a duty to adopt the necessary measures to comply with the directive within the prescribed period and that, by failing to do so, it had failed to fulfil its obligations.
6. Although the Hellenic Republic contends that the application should be dismissed, it does not deny that the directive has not been transposed into national law within the prescribed period. It merely points out that a draft ministerial order, which inter alia transposes Directive 91/271 into Greek legislation, will shortly be signed by the ministers jointly responsible. The reason for the delay, according to the Hellenic Republic, is the fact that transposition of the directive into Greek legislation is part of the comprehensive review of the existing laws governing the treatment of waste.
7. Since the directive has not been transposed within the prescribed period, the action brought by the Commission in relation to that failure must be regarded as well founded.
8. Consequently, it must be held that, by not adopting within the period prescribed the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 91/271, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 19 of that directive.