Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10
Source: data.gov.uk (2018-05-25)

Multi-agency public protection arrangements statistics. This annual publication presents the number of MAPPA eligible offenders in England and Wales, and information related to these offenders, including a summary of the information provided in the MAPPA reports published by each of the areas.

Multi-Agency Public 
Protection Arrangements 
Annual Report 2009/10 
 
Ministry of Justice 
Statistics bulletin  
 
 
 
Published 27 October 2010 
 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
1 
Introduction  
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) are a set of 
statutory arrangements to assess and manage the risk posed by certain 
sexual and violent offenders. They are established by virtue of Sections 325 
to 327 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.  
MAPPA bring together the Police, Probation and Prison Services into what 
is known as the MAPPA Responsible Authority for each MAPPA Area. 
MAPPA Areas are co-terminous with police force areas, as set out in the 
Police Act 1996. 
A number of other agencies are under a duty to co-operate with the 
Responsible Authority. These include: Children’s Services, Adult Social 
Services, Health Trusts and Authorities, Youth Offending Teams, local 
housing authorities and certain registered social landlords, Jobcentre Plus, 
and electronic monitoring providers. 
Offenders eligible for MAPPA are identified and information is gathered and 
shared about them across relevant agencies. The nature and level of the 
risk of harm they pose is assessed and a coordinated risk management plan 
is implemented to protect the public. 
By virtue of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, there are 3 broad categories of 
offender eligible for MAPPA: 
 Category 1 - Registered sexual offenders: offenders who have been 
convicted of a specified sexual offence and/or to whom the 
notification requirements under Part 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 
2003 apply (and who are therefore required to notify the Police of 
their name, address and other personal details, and notify the Police 
of any subsequent changes); 
 Category 2 - Violent offenders: offenders convicted of a specified 
violent offence and sentenced to imprisonment/detention for 12 
months or more, or detained under a hospital order.  This category 
also includes a small number of sexual offenders who do not qualify 
for the notification requirements that apply to Category 1 offenders 
and offenders disqualified from working with children; and 
 Category 3 - Other Dangerous Offenders: offenders who do not 
qualify under Categories 1 or 2 but have been assessed as currently 
posing a risk of serious harm.  The link between the offence they 
have perpetrated and the risk that they pose means that they require 
active multi-agency management. 
Within each category, there are 3 levels at which offenders are managed, 
which reflect the level of multi-agency co-operation required to implement 
effectively the individual offender’s risk management plan. Offenders may 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
2 
be moved up or down the levels to reflect changes in the level of risk that 
they present or the action required to manage it. 
 Level 1 - Ordinary Agency Management.  These offenders are 
subject to the usual management arrangements applied by 
whichever agency has the lead in supervising them. Information will 
still usually be exchanged between relevant agencies, especially 
between police and probation, but formal multi-agency meetings will 
not be held to discuss the offender’s case. 
 Level 2 - Active Multi-agency Management. The risk management 
plans for these offenders require the active involvement of several 
agencies via regular multi-agency public protection meetings.   
 Level 3 - Active Multi-agency Management.  As with offenders 
managed at Level 2, the active involvement of several agencies is 
required; however, the risk presented by offenders managed at 
Level 3 means that the involvement of senior staff from those 
agencies is additionally required to authorise the use of special 
resources, such as specialised accommodation.  
In most cases, the offender will be managed under the ordinary 
arrangements applied by the agency or agencies with supervisory 
responsibility. A number of offenders, though, require active multi-agency 
management, and their risk management plans will be formulated and 
monitored via Multi-Agency Public Protection meetings attended by various 
agencies. 
This is the first statistical bulletin to cover information on MAPPA annual 
reports. In previous years, this has been presented as management 
information. 
 
Key points from tables 
 On 31 March 2010 there were 48,338 MAPPA-eligible offenders. This 
is an increase of 8% when compared with 31 March 2009 (table 2). 
Table 1 shows the breakdown by Category of Offender and 
Management Level. The majority of cases (92%) are managed at 
Level 1. 
 There were 8,793 offenders managed at Level 2 and 843 offenders 
managed at Level 3 throughout 2009/10. These show a decrease 
from 2008/09 when the respective figures were 10,000 for Level 2 
and 923 for Level 3 (table 3). 
 The courts imposed 1,828 Sexual Offences Prevention Orders in 
2009/10 compared with 1,512 in 2008/09 (table 6). 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
3 
 1,116 Level 2 and Level 3 offenders have been returned to custody 
for breach of their licence, a drop of 21.1% from the previous year. 
There were 89 Level 2 and Level 3 offenders sent to custody for 
breach of their SOPO, an increase of 30.9% from the previous year 
(table 7). 
 There were 196 MAPPA-eligible offenders charged with murder or an 
offence listed in Schedule 15 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003, 
hereafter called a “serious further offence” (SFO), in 2009/10. Of 
these, 162 were managed at Level 1, 31 at Level 2, and 3 at Level 3 
(table 8). 
 Of those offenders charged with an SFO managed at Level 2 or 
Level 3, there were 14 instances which proceeded to a MAPPA 
Serious Case Review. All of these offenders were managed at Level 
2 at the time they were charged (table 14). 
 
Explanatory notes 
This is the first MAPPA annual report statistical bulletin, and the 2009/10 
information herein has been collected under the supervision of a statistician.  
Prior to 2009/10, information on MAPPA annual reports was not recorded or 
collected in the same manner. Furthermore, at a national level this 
information was published as part of management information reports rather 
than statistical bulletins. This management information was made available 
to the media. 
Figures prior to 2009/10 contained in this statistical bulletin are 
therefore included for context only and should not be considered as 
official statistics.  
Some previously-published information for 2008/09 has been revised where 
evidence indicated that there were inaccuracies in the published data. 
In addition, an error from 2006/07 has been corrected.  
Two changes have been made to the calculation of the rate of MAPPA 
Category 1 offenders (Registered Sexual Offenders) per 100,000 head of 
the population published in Table 4 of this bulletin. Firstly, the calculation 
has been made using the most recent mid-year population estimates 
available from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) for each of the years 
included in the table. Secondly, the base population figures used in this 
statistical bulletin exclude those aged less than 10 years, as 10 years of age 
is the age of criminal responsibility. As a consequence, the figures 
published in Table 4 of this bulletin will not be directly comparable to the 
Category 1 figures which have been published in previous years.   

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
4 
One MAPPA area has stated that it is unable to provide yearly totals of 
offenders managed at Level 2 and Level 3. Instead, it provided figures as a 
snapshot on 31 March for each of the relevant years. In the absence of 
alternative information, these were used to create Table 3. A note 
accompanies the table to reiterate this. 
A second MAPPA area has shown discrepancies between the annual totals 
and the snapshot figure taken on 31 March 2010 for Level 2 and Level 3 
offenders due to local problems with the recording of multi-agency data. A 
data cleansing exercise is currently underway. 
Information on Level 1 MAPPA SFOs has been collected for the first time for 
this publication. 
Unless otherwise stated, the yearly totals refer to the period between 
1st April of a given year and 31st March the following year. 
 
Symbols and conventions 
The following symbols have been used throughout the tables in this bulletin:  
-    
= Not applicable 
0   
= Nil 
..   
= Not available 
(r)  
= Revised data 
(p)  
= Provisional data 
══  
= Discontinuity in the series 
 
Definitions (in alphabetic order) 
Breach of licence – Offenders who are aged 18 and over and released into 
the community following a period of imprisonment of 12 months or more will 
be supervised by the Probation Service, subject to a licence with conditions. 
If the offender is found to have failed to comply or breached those 
conditions, action may be taken to recall the offender back to custody. 
Foreign Travel Orders – A restrictive order that may be applied to prevent 
offenders with convictions for sexual offences against children from 
travelling abroad, where this is considered necessary to protect children 
from the risk of sexual harm. Police may apply to the court for these orders. 
The Order is granted by the Court on application from the Police. 
MAPPA-eligible offenders – Offenders defined in law as eligible for 
MAPPA management, because they have committed specified sexual and 
violent offences, or have been assessed as presenting a serious risk of 
harm to the public. 
MAPPA Serious Case Review (MAPPA SCR) – It is mandatory for a 
MAPPA SCR to be carried out by the local MAPPA Strategic Management 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
5 
Board where an MAPPA offender managed at either Level 2 or 3 is charged 
with committing an offence of murder, manslaughter or rape or attempting to 
commit murder or rape. 
MAPPA SCRs may also be conducted on a discretionary basis in the 
following circumstances:   
 where a MAPPA offender managed at Level 1 is charged with 
committing an offence of murder, manslaughter or rape or attempting 
to commit murder or rape; or 
 where a MAPPA offender managed at any level is charged with one 
of the serious offences listed in Probation Circular 22/2008 
(PC 22/2008); or 
 where it is assessed that it would be in the public interest to 
undertake a review. For example, a case which results in serious 
physical or psychological harm to a vulnerable adult or child but is not 
an offence listed in Probation Circular 22/2008 
The purpose of the review is to examine the activity of the agencies involved 
in the management of the offender and whether MAPPA guidance and 
policies were followed appropriately.  
The MAPPA SCR should identify whether there are lessons to be learned 
from the way in which the case was managed and how they will be acted 
upon. A MAPPA SCR and Probation SFO review (see below) may be 
conducted simultaneously. 
Notification Order – A restrictive order which requires sexual offenders 
who have been convicted of a sexual offence overseas to register with the 
UK police, in order to protect the public in the UK from any risk that they 
pose.  Police may apply to the court for the order in relation to offenders 
living in, or intending to come to, the UK. 
Restrictive Orders – Orders used to assist in managing the risks presented 
by an offender. These were introduced in the Sexual Offences Act (2003) 
and include Notification Orders, Sexual Offences Prevention Orders and 
Foreign Travel Orders (see individual definitions).  
Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOPO) – A restrictive order that may 
be made by a Court at the time that an offender convicted of a sexual 
offence is sentenced, or may be applied by the Court following an 
application by the police. The length of term that the SOPO may apply for is 
variable: the minimum term is 5 years; however, a SOPO may be imposed 
for the remainder of the offender’s life. A SOPO will require the subject to 
register with the Police as a sexual offender and can include conditions, for 
example, to prevent the offender loitering near schools or playgrounds. If 
the offender fails to comply with the requirements of the order, he or she 
can be taken back to court and may be liable to up to 5 years’ 
imprisonment. 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
6 
Serious Further Offence (SFO) – For the purposes of this Bulletin, an 
offender under probation supervision, normally either subject to a court 
order or on licensed supervision after release from a custodial sentence, 
who is charged with a serious sexual or violent offence will be considered to 
have committed a SFO if his or her offence is either murder or listed in the 
qualifying offences based on Schedule 15 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 
(this was originally based on those offences in the Schedule which carried 
maxima of 14 years and Life, but as of 1 December 2008 it excludes s.18 
wounding with intent.) 
Probation Serious Further Offence (SFO) Review Process – A 
mandatory SFO Review will be conducted where an offender under 
probation supervision or within 28 days of completing supervision is charged 
with an offence in the following circumstances: 
  The offender is charged with perpetrating or attempting to carry out 
one of the most serious offences, i.e. murder, manslaughter, or 
another offence causing death, rape, or a sexual offence against a 
child under 13 (including attempted offences).  
 The offender is charged with another offence in Schedule 15 to the 
Criminal Justice Act 2003, except Section 18 assault, and his or her 
risk of serious harm has been assessed as high or very high during 
the current sentence, or he or she has not been subject to a risk 
assessment during the current sentence. 
A discretionary SFO Review may be carried out where: 
 The offender is charged with an offence outside the above eligibility 
criteria, but it is decided by the National Offender Management 
Service (NOMS) and the Probation Trust that it may be in the public 
interest to complete a notification and subsequent review. This would 
apply regardless of whether the offence was on the SFO qualifying 
list or not. 
A MAPPA SCR and Probation Serious Further Offence review may be 
conducted simultaneously. 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
7 
Contact points for further information 
 
Press enquiries should be directed to the Ministry of Justice press office:  
 
Tel: xx-xxxx-xxxx  
Other enquiries about these statistics should be directed to:  
 
Iain Bell  
Ministry of Justice  
Justice Statistics Analytical Services  
7th Floor  
102 Petty France  
London  
SW1H 9AJ  
Tel: xx-xxxx-xxxx  
 
General enquiries about the statistical work of the Ministry of Justice can be 
e-mailed to: xxx@xxx.xx 
 
General information about the official statistics system of the UK is available 
from www.statistics.gov.uk 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
Summary of MAPPA eligible offenders 
Table 1: MAPPA-eligible offenders on 31 March 2010 
Category 1 
Category 2 
Category 3
Total 
Management 
Levels
Registered Sexual 
Offenders
Violent 
Offenders
Other Dangerous 
Offenders
Level 1
32,965
11,522
-
44,487
Level 2
1,856
1,183
576
3,615
Level 3
118
61
57
236
Total
34,939
12,766
633
48,338
Note: Category 3 offenders managed are only managed at Level 2 and Level 3.
 
 
Table 2: MAPPA-eligible offenders by Category on 31 March (a)  
Category 1 
Category 2 (a)
Category 3 (a)
Total 
Year
Registered Sexual 
Offenders
Violent 
Offenders
Other Dangerous 
Offenders
2005/06
29,983
14,292
3,313
-
2006/07
30,416
14,921 (r) 
3,132
-
2007/08
31,392
16,249
2,569
-
2008/09
32,347 (r) 
11,527
884 (r) 
44,758 (r) 
2009/10
34,939
12,766
633
48,338
(a) Up to and including 2007/08 this figure was a yearly total; from 2008/09 this figure is taken at 31 March. 
Category 1 has always been taken on 31st March of the relevant year.
 
Table 3: MAPPA-eligible offenders in Level 2 and Level 3 by category 
(yearly total) 
Year
Level 2
Level 3
Level 2
Level 3
Level 2
Level 3
Level 2
Level 3
2005/06
6,012
580
4,026
493
2,383
194
12,421
1,267
2006/07
5,894
558
5,205
502
2,943
189
14,042
1,249
2007/08
5,271
507
4,057
402
2,406
163
11,734
1,072
2008/09
4,408
424
3,891
320
1,701
179 (r) 
10,000
923 (r) 
2009/10
3,833
362
3,499
313
1,461
168
8,793
843
Note: One area has stated that is not possible to provide yearly figures and instead provide only the figures as at 31 March of the 
relevant year, which were used to produce this table. A second area's figures show discrepancies between the yearly totals and 
the snapshot as of 31 March 2010. This was due to inherited local problems with archiving.
Category 1
Category 2
Category 3
Total
 
 
8 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
Table 4: Category 1 offenders per 100,000 head of population aged 10 
or over on 31 March  
Year
Number of Category 1 offenders 
per 100,000 of population aged 
10 and above
2005/06
63.50 (r) 
2006/07
64.01 (r) 
2007/08
65.61 (r) 
2008/09
67.19 (r) 
2009/10
72.16
 
 
9 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
Restrictive Orders for Category 1 offenders 
Restrictive Orders are used to assist in managing the risks presented by an 
offender. See Definitions for further details. 
Table 5: Category 1 offenders who were either cautioned or convicted 
for breaches of the requirement  
Year
Total
2005/06
1,286
2006/07
1,552
2007/08
1,634
2008/09
1,337
2009/10
1,518  
 
Table 6: Sexual Offences Prevention Orders (SOPOs), Notification 
Orders (NOs) and Foreign Travel Orders (FTOs) imposed by the courts  
Year
SOPOs imposed
NOs imposed
FTOs imposed
2005/06
937
37
1
2006/07
1,114
62
3
2007/08
1,440
70
1
2008/09
1,512
72
12
2009/10
1,828
67
15
 
10 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
Level 2 and Level 3 Offenders Returned to Custody 
Table 7: Offenders managed at Level 2 and Level 3 returned to custody 
for a breach of licence or sent to custody for breach of SOPO 
Year
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Level 2
Level 3
Total
2005/06
1,305
226
1,531
81
21
102
2006/07
1,566
218
1,784
72
17
89
2007/08
1,451
208
1,659
76
20
96
2008/09
1,297
117
1,414
58
10
68
2009/10
997
119
1,116
81
8
89
Breach of Licence
Breach of SOPO
 
 
 
11 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
12 
MAPPA-eligible offenders charged with Serious 
Further Offences  
Table 8: MAPPA-eligible offenders charged with a Serious Further 
Offence 
Year
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
2005/06
..
50
12
-
2006/07
..
69
13
-
2007/08
..
72
7
-
2008/09 (a)
..
40
8
-
2009/10
162
31
3
196
(a) On 01/12/2008, Probation Circular 22/2008 introduced changes in the process 
for notification and the subsequent review of SFOs. As a result, the figures for 
2008/09 include cases before and after the changes and therefore are not directly 
comparable with the previous and subsquent year. 
 
 
 
 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
Table 9: MAPPA-eligible offenders charged with a Serious Further Offence in 2009/10 
Level 1 Level 2
Level 3
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 2 Level 3
Total
92
12
0
70
9
1
10
2
196
A conviction for SFO
44
10
1
38
8
0
4
0
105
Offender still charged with SFO at 31/03/2010
31
6
0
16
3
1
4
1
62
Any other outcome
17
2
0
16
2
1
3
1
42
(a)
as defined in Probation Circular 22/2008.
(b) 
Category 2
Category 3
includes Level 2 and Level 3 offenders who remained charged with a SFO on 31 March 2009.
Outcome: (b)
Offenders charged with an SFO in 2009/10 (a) 
Category 1
 
 
Note: Please see Tables 10 through 13 for an area breakdown for each of the lines in the table. 
 
13 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
14 
5
3
1
0
6
2
4
7
1
2
3
5
6
3
1
2
3
2
4
Table 10: MAPPA eligible offenders charged with a Serious Further 
Offence in 2009/10 
Area
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Level 2 Level 3
Total 
All Areas
92
12
0
70
9
1
10
2
196
Avon and Somerset
3
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
5
Bedfordshire
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
Cambridgeshire
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Cheshire
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
County Durham
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Cumbria
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Derbyshire
4
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
6
Devon and Cornwall
6
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
7
Dorset
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dyfed-Powys
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Essex
4
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
Gloucestershire
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
Gwent
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
Hampshire
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
Hertfordshire
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Humberside
2
0
0
5
0
0
1
0
8
Kent
2
0
0
2
2
0
1
0
Lancashire
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Leicestershire
5
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
7
Lincolnshire
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
London
10
3
0
10
1
0
0
0
24
Greater Manchester
2
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
11
Merseyside
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Norfolk
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
North Wales
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
North Yorkshire
2
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
Northamptonshire
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
Northumbria
3
1
0
2
1
0
2
0
9
Nottinghamshire
6
1
0
2
0
0
0
1
10
South Wales
2
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
South Yorkshire
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
Staffordshire
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Suffolk
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Surrey
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
Sussex
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Teesside
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Thames Valley
2
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
7
Warwickshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
West Mercia
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
West Midlands
2
1
0
4
1
1
0
0
9
West Yorkshire
7
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
16
Wiltshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Category 1
Category 2
Category 3
 
 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
Table 11: MAPPA-eligible offenders charged with and subsequently 
convicted of a Serious Further Offence in 2009/10 by 31 March 2010 
Note: Includes Level 2 and Level 3 offenders who remained charged with a 
SFO on 31 March 2009. 
15 
3
1
0
0
2
0
3
2
0
2
3
5
4
1
1
0
2
1
1
Area
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Level 2 Level 3
Total 
All Areas
44
10
1
38
8
0
4
0
105
Avon and Somerset
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
Bedfordshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cambridgeshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cheshire
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
County Durham
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Cumbria
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Derbyshire
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
Devon and Cornwall
5
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
6
Dorset
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dyfed-Powys
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Essex
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Gloucestershire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Gwent
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Hampshire
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Hertfordshire
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Humberside
2
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
6
Kent
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Lancashire
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Leicestershire
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
4
Lincolnshire
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
London
4
2
0
7
1
0
0
0
14
Greater Manchester
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
3
Merseyside
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Norfolk
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
North Wales
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
North Yorkshire
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
Northamptonshire
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
Northumbria
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
5
Nottinghamshire
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
South Wales
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
South Yorkshire
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Staffordshire
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Suffolk
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Surrey
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
Sussex
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Teesside
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Thames Valley
2
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
5
Warwickshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
West Mercia
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
West Midlands
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
West Yorkshire
1
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
6
Wiltshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Category 1
Category 2
Category 3
 
 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
Table 12: MAPPA-eligible offenders charged with a Serious Further 
Offence in 2009/10 who remained charged on 31 March 2010 
Note: Includes Level 2 and Level 3 offenders who remained charged with a 
SFO on 31 March 2009. 
16 
2
1
0
0
1
2
1
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
2
Area
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Level 2 Level 3
Total 
All Areas
31
6
0
16
3
1
4
1
62
Avon and Somerset
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Bedfordshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cambridgeshire
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Cheshire
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
County Durham
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Cumbria
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Derbyshire
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Devon and Cornwall
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Dorset
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dyfed-Powys
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Essex
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Gloucestershire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Gwent
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
Hampshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Hertfordshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Humberside
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
Kent
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
Lancashire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Leicestershire
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Lincolnshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
London
3
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
8
Greater Manchester
2
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
8
Merseyside
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Norfolk
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
North Wales
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
North Yorkshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Northamptonshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Northumbria
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Nottinghamshire
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
South Wales
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
South Yorkshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Staffordshire
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Suffolk
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Surrey
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sussex
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Teesside
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Thames Valley
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
Warwickshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
West Mercia
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
West Midlands
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
West Yorkshire
5
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
8
Wiltshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Category 1
Category 2
Category 3
 
 
 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
Table 13: MAPPA-eligible offenders charged with a Serious Further 
Offence in 2009/10 resulting in any other outcome by 31 March 2010 
(e.g. charge dropped, acquittal, conviction for non-SFO)  
Note: Includes Level 2 and Level 3 offenders who remained charged with a 
SFO on 31 March 2009. 
17 
0
1
1
0
3
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
2
2
1
1
0
1
1
Area
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Level 2 Level 3
Total 
All Areas
17
2
0
16
2
1
3
1
42
Avon and Somerset
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bedfordshire
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
Cambridgeshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cheshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
County Durham
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cumbria
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Derbyshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
Devon and Cornwall
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dorset
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dyfed-Powys
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Essex
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Gloucestershire
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
Gwent
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Hampshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Hertfordshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Humberside
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
3
Kent
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Lancashire
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Leicestershire
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
Lincolnshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
London
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Greater Manchester
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
Merseyside
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Norfolk
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
North Wales
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
North Yorkshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Northamptonshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Northumbria
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
Nottinghamshire
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
4
South Wales
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
South Yorkshire
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Staffordshire
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Suffolk
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Surrey
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sussex
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Teesside
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Thames Valley
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
Warwickshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
West Mercia
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
West Midlands
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
4
West Yorkshire
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
Wiltshire
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Category 1
Category 2
Category 3
 
 

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2009/10, 27 October 2010 
 
18 
Table 14: MAPPA Serious Case Review resulting from Level 2 and 
Level 3 offenders charged with a Serious Further Offence  
Area 
Level 2
Level 3 
Total
All Areas
14
0
14
Avon and Somerset
0
0
0
Bedfordshire
1
0
1
Cambridgeshire
1
0
1
Cheshire
0
0
0
County Durham
1
0
1
Cumbria
0
0
0
Derbyshire
0
0
0
Devon and Cornwall
0
0
0
Dorset
0
0
0
Dyfed-Powys
0
0
0
Essex
0
0
0
Gloucestershire
1
0
1
Gwent
0
0
0
Hampshire
0
0
0
Hertfordshire
0
0
0
Humberside
1
0
1
Kent
0
0
0
Lancashire
0
0
0
Leicestershire
0
0
0
Lincolnshire
0
0
0
London
2
0
2
Greater Manchester
0
0
0
Merseyside
1
0
1
Norfolk
0
0
0
North Wales
0
0
0
North Yorkshire
1
0
1
Northamptonshire
0
0
0
Northumbria
1
0
1
Nottinghamshire
0
0
0
South Wales
0
0
0
South Yorkshire
0
0
0
Staffordshire
0
0
0
Suffolk
0
0
0
Surrey
1
0
1
Sussex
0
0
0
Teesside
0
0
0
Thames Valley
1
0
1
Warwickshire
0
0
0
West Mercia
0
0
0
West Midlands
2
0
2
West Yorkshire
0
0
0
Wiltshire
0
0
0  
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
© Crown copyright 
Produced by the Ministry of Justice 
Alternative formats are available on request from xxx@xxx.xx