theodi/ndl-core-corpus huggingface dataset:
Fraser Devlin (t/a Silver Swan Travel) (T): [2025] UKUT 364 (AAC)
Source: gov.uk (2025-12-01)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Caldwell on 23 October 2025.

Read the full decision in UA-xx-xxxx-xxxx-T (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/692db11ba245b0985f034375/UA-xx-xxxx-xxxx-T.pdf).

Judicial Summary

The Deputy Traffic Commissioner’s decision to disqualify the Appellant indefinitely did not involve an error of law.
SPE11050 - Reviews and appeals: consultation with policy team
Source: gov.uk (2025-11-24)


This manual will be archived on 15 December 2025. For up-to-date guidance on special procedures, please refer to Pay less or no duty on goods you store, repair, process or temporarily use (GOV.UK) (https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/pay-less-or-no-duty-on-goods-you-store-repair-process-or-temporarily-use) and Customs Technical Handbooks (GOV.UK) (https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/customs-technical-handbooks). If you have feedback about this manual being archived, email xxx@xxx.xx (mailto:xxx@xxx.xx).

Note: This manual is under review and is likely to be withdrawn. If there is anything within this manual you use regularly, please email xxx@xxx.xx (mailto:xxx@xxx.xx?subject=%node:field_page_reference feedback) to let us know. Please check the other guidance available on GOV.UK from HMRC (https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-revenue-customs/services-information).

The NRA team will consult with CSP policy team where necessary but particularly on cases that involve interpretation or challenges to existing procedures or legislation.

Examples of when the Special Procedures Policy team will be consulted by NRA are:
- cases regarded as sensitive including where:
- the dispute may have national or international implications
- the case involves prominent public figures
- it is likely to result in considerable media interest
- it concerns decisions where there has been involvement with other Government Departments or agencies.
Also cases where:
- large amounts of revenue are at stake
- there is no established precedent
- there is an opportunity for law to be clarified
- it is alleged that UK requirements or procedures conflict with EU legislation
- the basic concepts of the customs procedure or law are under attack
- new legislation is being tested for the first time
- the disputed decision was based on CSP policy team advice
- a point of law or interpretation is at issue.
The purpose of this consultation is to inform the evaluation process of UK customs requirements and procedures, and to ensure consistent and equal application of what can be very complex UK domestic legislation and also to provide NRA assurance that decisions stand up to 'expert' scrutiny.

These types of cases are also helpful in highlighting areas of guidance that need clarification or amendment or where current legislation may not be meeting the needs of UK traders and allow policy team to propose amendments.

Note: Northern Ireland (NI) customs authorisations will continue to fall within the provisions of the Union Customs Code (UCC), as retained by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and CEMA 1979.
Regent's Park Healthcare Limited
Source: gov.uk (2025-11-10)

We, the undersigned, commit to honour the Armed Forces Covenant and support the Armed Forces Community. We recognise the value Serving Personnel, both Regular and Reservists, Veterans and military families contribute to our business and our country.

The Armed Forces Covenant

An enduring covenant between the people of the United Kingdom, Her Majesty’s Government and all those who serve or have served in the Armed Forces of the Crown and their families

The first duty of Government is the defence of the realm. Our Armed Forces fulfil that responsibility on behalf of the Government, sacrificing some civilian freedoms, facing danger and, sometimes, suffering serious injury or death as a result of their duty. Families also play a vital role in supporting the operational effectiveness of our Armed Forces. In return, the whole nation has a moral obligation to the members of the Naval Service, the Army and the Royal Air Force, together with their families. They deserve our respect and support, and fair treatment.

Those who serve in the Armed Forces, whether Regular or Reserve, those who have served in the past, and their families, should face no disadvantage compared to other citizens in the provision of public and commercial services. Special consideration is appropriate in some cases, especially for those who have given most such as the injured and the bereaved.

This obligation involves the whole of society: it includes voluntary and charitable bodies, private organisations, and the actions of individuals in supporting the Armed Forces. Recognising those who have performed military duty unites the country and demonstrates the value of their contribution. This has no greater expression than in upholding this Covenant.

Section 1: Principles of the Armed Forces Corporate Covenant

1.1 We Regent’s Park Healthcare Limited will endeavour in our business dealings to uphold the key principles of the Armed Forces Covenant, which are:
- no member of the Armed Forces Community should face disadvantage in the provision of public and commercial services compared to any other citizen;
- and in some circumstances that special treatment may be appropriate especially for the injured or bereaved.
Section 2: Demonstrating our commitment

2.1 Regent’s Park Healthcare Limited recognises the value serving personnel, reservists, veterans and military families bring to our business. We will seek to uphold the principles of the Armed Forces Covenant, by pledging to the following:
- Armed Forces Friendly
- UK Reservists
- Reserve Forces Day
- Discounts
2.2 We will publicise these commitments through our literature and/or on our website, setting out how we will seek to honour them and inviting feedback from the Service community and our customers on how we are doing.
SGSELSG7030 - Identifying goods requiring a specific licence
Source: gov.uk (2025-11-24)


This manual will be archived on 15 December 2025. If there is content within this manual you use regularly, email xxx@xxx.xx (mailto:xxx@xxx.xx) to let us know.

Step 4

Are the goods covered by the legal exceptions listed in SGSELSPC?

Yes go to SGSELSG7040

No go to SGSELSG7050
Miss N Lancaster v Lincolnshire County Council: 2600881/2023
Source: gov.uk (2025-03-31)

Employment Tribunal decision.

Read the full decision in Miss N Lancaster v Lincolnshire County Council: 2600881/2023 - Reserved Judgment (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67e6c8a296745eff958ca040/Miss._Nicola_Lancaster_v_Lincolnshire_County_Council_2600881.2023_Reserved_Judgment.pdf).
Premier Support Services Ltd
Source: gov.uk (2025-11-10)

We, the undersigned, commit to honour the Armed Forces Covenant and support the Armed Forces Community. We recognise the value Serving Personnel, both Regular and Reservists, Veterans and military families contribute to our business and our country.

The Armed Forces Covenant

An enduring covenant between the people of the United Kingdom, Her Majesty’s Government and all those who serve or have served in the Armed Forces of the Crown and their families

The first duty of Government is the defence of the realm. Our Armed Forces fulfil that responsibility on behalf of the Government, sacrificing some civilian freedoms, facing danger and, sometimes, suffering serious injury or death as a result of their duty. Families also play a vital role in supporting the operational effectiveness of our Armed Forces. In return, the whole nation has a moral obligation to the members of the Naval Service, the Army and the Royal Air Force, together with their families. They deserve our respect and support, and fair treatment.

Those who serve in the Armed Forces, whether Regular or Reserve, those who have served in the past, and their families, should face no disadvantage compared to other citizens in the provision of public and commercial services. Special consideration is appropriate in some cases, especially for those who have given most such as the injured and the bereaved.

This obligation involves the whole of society: it includes voluntary and charitable bodies, private organisations, and the actions of individuals in supporting the Armed Forces. Recognising those who have performed military duty unites the country and demonstrates the value of their contribution. This has no greater expression than in upholding this Covenant.

Section 1: Principles of the Armed Forces Corporate Covenant

1.1 We Premier Support Services Ltd will endeavour in our business dealings to uphold the key principles of the Armed Forces Covenant, which are:
- no member of the Armed Forces Community should face disadvantage in the provision of public and commercial services compared to any other citizen;
- and in some circumstances that special treatment may be appropriate especially for the injured or bereaved.
Section 2: Demonstrating our commitment

2.1 Premier Support Services Ltd recognises the value serving personnel, reservists, veterans and military families bring to our business. We will seek to uphold the principles of the Armed Forces Covenant, by pledging to the following:
- Armed Forces Friendly
- UK Service Veterans And Leavers
- UK Reservists
- UK Cadets
- Armed Forces Day
- Reserve Forces Day
- Armed Forces Charities
2.2 We will publicise these commitments through our literature and/or on our website, setting out how we will seek to honour them and inviting feedback from the Service community and our customers on how we are doing.
Report 3: offensive weapons homicide review, Brent
Source: gov.uk (2025-07-09)

Offensive weapons homicide review of the incident in Brent in July 2023.

This is the third report from the offensive weapons homicide reviews (https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/offensive-weapons-homicide-reviews) 18-month pilot, which ended on 30 September 2024.

Safer Brent Partnership co-ordinated the review on behalf of the relevant review partners.

For further details on offensive weapons homicide reviews please see: offensive weapons homicide reviews (https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/offensive-weapons-homicide-reviews).
Mr K Grossett v Johnson & Johnson Ltd (T/a Kenvue): 3313475/2023
Source: gov.uk (2025-11-05)

Employment Tribunal decision.

Read the full decision in Mr K Grossett v Johnson & Johnson Ltd (T/a Kenvue): 3313475/2023 - Dismissal (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6904cefa19a898f0b18980c7/Mr_K_Grossett_v_Johnson___Johnson_Limited__ta_Kenvue__-_3313475-2023_-_Judgment.pdf).

Read the full decision in Mr K Grossett v Johnson & Johnson Ltd (T/a Kenvue): 3313475/2023 - Dismissal (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68357b45c054883884bff537/Mr_K_GROSSETT_v_Johnson___Johnson_Ltd__trading_as_KENVUE__3313475_2023_FMH_Judgment.pdf).

Read the full decision in Mr K Grossett v Johnson & Johnson Ltd (T/a Kenvue): 3313475/2023 - Reasons (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68357b95e9440506ee953ad0/Mr_Ky_GROSSETT_v_Johnson___Johnson_Limited__trading_as_KENVUE__3313475_2023_Reasons_.pdf).
CIL Appeal  1853379  – 02 Dec 24 – Extension and alterations to outbuildings
Source: gov.uk (2025-02-26)

Erection of extension and alterations to ancillary outbuilding; erection of garage and car port following demolition of existing garage/car port and garden building.

Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is a relatively new activity for local planning authorities, developers and landowners. The government has decided that from June 2013, CIL appeal decision notices will be published by the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) in a redacted anonymous form.

In making decisions available to the public, useful lessons about CIL regulations and appeals can be shared. Publication will also allow any precedents to be understood more widely.

Personal information will be redacted before publication. This could be information such as the:
- name of the appellant
- collecting authority
- address of the property
- amount of CIL payable
SPE15910 - Simplified procedures: imports
Source: gov.uk (2025-11-24)


This manual will be archived on 15 December 2025. For up-to-date guidance on special procedures, please refer to Pay less or no duty on goods you store, repair, process or temporarily use (GOV.UK) (https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/pay-less-or-no-duty-on-goods-you-store-repair-process-or-temporarily-use) and Customs Technical Handbooks (GOV.UK) (https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/customs-technical-handbooks). If you have feedback about this manual being archived, email xxx@xxx.xx (mailto:xxx@xxx.xx).

Note: This manual is under review and is likely to be withdrawn. If there is anything within this manual you use regularly, please email xxx@xxx.xx (mailto:xxx@xxx.xx?subject=%node:field_page_reference feedback) to let us know. Please check the other guidance available on GOV.UK from HMRC (https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-revenue-customs/services-information).

A valid CFSP authorisation must be held to use simplified procedures to enter goods to a customs warehouse using either the:
- Simplified Declaration Procedure
- Entry In Declarants Records
It should be noted that a CFSP authorisation is not required when the Entry In Declarants Records (EIDR) is used for the receipt of goods transferred from another customs warehouse.

Note: Northern Ireland (NI) customs authorisations will continue to fall within the provisions of the Union Customs Code (UCC), as retained by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and CEMA 1979.
Product Safety Report: Sedom SD-T10 Table Lamp sold via Amazon (2504-0106)
Source: gov.uk (2025-05-21)

Product Safety Report for a Sedom SD-T10 Table Lamp presenting a risk of electric shock.

Summary

Sedom SD-T10 Table Lamp

Hazard: This product presents a risk of electric shock as it is incorrectly labelled for outdoor use.

Corrective action: The import has been rejected at the border and destroyed.

Product information

Hazard

The product presents a serious risk of electric shock as the instructions state that it can be used outdoors, despite not having adequate ratings to prevent water ingress. If water damages the product internally, the user could receive an electric shock.

The product does not meet the requirements of the Electrical Equipment (Safety) Regulations 2016.

Corrective action

The import has been rejected at the border and destroyed.

Additional information

PSD notification number: 2504-0106

Notified by: Local Authority Trading Standards
CTM34610 - Residence: dual resident companies: anti-avoidance - limitation of loss relief
Source: gov.uk (2025-08-12)


Without the various other provisions listed at CTM34505 (https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/company-taxation-manual/ctm34505) it would be possible for groups to avoid the effect of CTA10/S109 by transferring profits to a dual resident investing company to use up its losses without resorting to group relief. In order to keep the double deduction, the profits transferred to a dual resident investing company would have to be taxable only in one state. This could be achieved, as far as the UK is concerned, by transferring an asset or a trade in respect of which a chargeable gain or balancing charge has accrued over a period of time, to a dual resident investing company under provisions relating to groups. The recipient company then could realise the chargeable gain or balancing charge by the disposal of the asset or trade to a third party.

Example

A, B and C are companies in a multinational group.

Company A is UK incorporated and UK resident.

Company B is a dual resident investing company and is US incorporated.

Company C is US incorporated and US resident.

Company A and Company B are members of a UK sub-group.

Company B and Company C are members of a US sub-group.

Company A and Company C each have profits of £100.

Company B has a loss of £100.

Company A has an asset on which a chargeable gain has accrued over a period of time. Without TCGA92/S171 (2), Company A could transfer the asset to Company B under the provisions of TCGA92/S171 on a no gain/no loss basis. Company B would immediately sell the asset to a third party and realise a chargeable gain of £100 liable to CT (ignoring indexation and so forth).

Then Company B could set its loss of £100 against the gain in accordance with the normal rules giving relief for charges, trading losses and other reliefs. As far as the United States sub-group is concerned, however, Company B would be treated as acquiring the asset from Company A at its current market value. So any gain (or loss) on the subsequent sale of the asset outside the group would be negligible. Company B would therefore make a loss of £100 (or thereabouts) in United States' tax terms which could be set against Company C's profits. The group still would have got relief of £200 for Company B's loss of £100.

Under TCGA92/S171 (2)(d) the benefit of TCGA92/S171 (1) is denied to A. This crystallises the chargeable gain in Company A rather than in Company B. Hence Company B is unable to use its loss of £100 in the UK. The exclusion from TCGA92/S171 only works in one direction, though, in relation to assets transferred to a dual resident investing company. The no gain/no loss basis still applies to a transfer of an asset from Company B to Company A.
Company Names Tribunal decision: Kluwer IT Solution Limited
Source: gov.uk (2025-05-08)

Decision for applicant Wolters Kluwer (UK) Limited against registration number 15552316, applicant successful.

Application number 5094

Applicant Wolters Kluwer (UK) Limited objected to the name used by Kluwer IT Solution Limited under the Companies Act 2006.

This decision was undefended. ‘Undefended’ refers to decisions where there has been no defence in response to the application to the Company Names Tribunal.

Signed order

On the 6 May 2025 the adjudicator hereby gives notice under sections 73(4) and (5) of the Companies Act 2006 that the company name of Kluwer IT Solution Limited is changed to 15552316, Ltd.
Ms E Baird v Glasgow City Council and Cordia (Services) LLP: 111678/2010
Source: gov.uk (2025-05-21)

Employment Tribunal decision.

Read the full decision in Ms E Baird v Glasgow City Council and Cordia (Services) LLP: 111678/2010 - Strike Out (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/682c3aaf02662c6f8ec24485/Ms_E_Baird_v_Glasgow_City_Council___Cordia__Services__LLP_-_111678_-_Judgment.pdf).
General Trade Licence for sanctioned Russian synthetic diamonds processed in third countries
Source: gov.uk (2025-04-23)

The General Trade Licence for sanctioned Russian synthetic diamonds processed in third countries permits the import into the UK of certain prohibited goods.

The General Trade Licence for sanctioned Russian synthetic diamonds processed in third countries permits the import into the UK of certain prohibited goods that:
- were outside of Russia on 24 April 2025 and are larger or equal to 0.5 carats in weight and have remained outside of Russia since that date
Alongside the import of these goods, the licence permits the provision of certain services and actions related to their import. It may also be used in cases where a trader is unaware of a good’s origin, such that their goods are potentially prohibited. The licence has a record-keeping requirement with the category above being subject to further conditions.

The licence number for this licence is GBSAN0003.

See Statutory guidance: Russia sanctions (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/russia-sanctions-guidance/russia-sanctions-guidance) and Notice to Importers 2953: Russia Import Sanctions (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/notice-to-importers-2953-russia-import-sanctions).
Immigration Act 2014 – appeals: caseworker guidance
Source: gov.uk (2025-10-01)

Immigration staff guidance on the appeals process from the Immigration Act 2014.

UK Visas and Immigration guidance for staff on how the reformed appeals system works and gives guidance on transitional provisions.

The appeals changes in the Immigration Act 2014 have been fully implemented.

We are aware of accessibility issues with these publications. We are working to fix these.

Read more about our accessible documents policy (https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office/about/accessible-documents-policy).
KL v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2025] UKUT 153 (AAC)
Source: gov.uk (2025-06-05)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Gray on 19 May 2025.

Read the full decision in UA-xx-xxxx-xxxx-PIP (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6841745bd5f6bf75703e8772/UA-xx-xxxx-xxxx-PIP_1.pdf).

Judicial Summary

This appeal examines Activity 4 and decides that it is testing the ability of the claimant to perform the mechanical functions of washing and bathing, which are getting in and out of a bath or shower and being able to wash their body parts as set out in the descriptors. It is not a test as to the quality of washing, but the physical and mental ability to do so. It also explains the importance of the First-tier Tribunal assessing the evidence as a whole, using evidence about one activity to inform its views as to the ability to accomplish other activities.
Teacher misconduct panel outcome: Mr Christopher Way
Source: gov.uk (2025-07-28)

Professional conduct panel outcome, including decision and reasons.

The Secretary of State does not make these decisions themselves. They are made by a senior official on the recommendation of an independent panel.

Teacher’s name: Mr Christopher Way

Teacher reference number: 1046226

Teacher’s date of birth: 15 March 1977

Location teacher worked: Essex, East of England

Date of professional conduct panel: 08 to 10 July 2025

Outcome type: Prohibition order

Notice is hereby given that, in accordance with The Teachers’ Disciplinary (England) Regulations 2012, a professional conduct panel was convened to consider the case of Mr Christopher Way formerly employed in Essex, East on England.

Teacher misconduct

Ground Floor, South Cheylesmore House 5 Quinton RoadCoventryCV1 2WT

Email xxx@xxx.xx (mailto:xxx@xxx.xx)

Telephone xx-xxxx-xxxx

Information about regulating the teaching profession and the process for dealing with serious teacher misconduct.
Register of OPG Board members’ interests
Source: gov.uk (2025-07-16)

A register of the private interests declared by board members of the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG).

OPG maintains a register of board members’ interests.

This list sets out declared interests of non-executive and executive members of the OPG Board as at April 2025.

On appointment, all board members are asked to declare any personal, business, or related party interests that may influence (or be perceived by a reasonable member of the public to influence) their judgments in performing their obligations to the agency.

Board members are also asked to declare any new conflicts of interest before the start of each meeting.
Mr M Nelson v XS Hospitality Ltd: 6020684/2025
Source: gov.uk (2025-08-06)

Employment Tribunal decision.

Read the full decision in Mr M Nelson v XS Hospitality Ltd: 6020684/2025 - Rule 22 (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68936e81303b0dad411d4e9d/Mr_M_Nelson_v_XS_Hospitality_Ltd_-_6020684.2025.pdf).
Mr M Smith v Qube Qualifications and Development Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade: 3305327/2023
Source: gov.uk (2025-03-03)

Employment Tribunal decision.

Read the full decision in Mr M Smith v Qube Qualifications and Development Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade: 3305327/2023 - Judgment (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67c0544268a61757838d2051/Mr_M_Smith_v_Qube_Qualifications_and_Development_Limited__in_Creditors_Voluntary_Liquidation___-_3305327-2023_-__Judgment.pdf).
Mr Y Ahmad and Mr S Choudhury v Lintech Group Ltd: 1311969/2024 and 1311970/2024
Source: gov.uk (2025-11-13)

Employment Tribunal decision.

Read the full decision in Mr Y Ahmad and Mr S Choudhury v Lintech Group Ltd: 1311969/2024 and 1311970/2024 - Partial Withdrawal (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/691359e32017198896ad7fc8/Mr_Y_Ahmad__First_Claimant__and_Mr_S_Choudhury__Second_Claimant__v_Lintech_Group_Ltd_-_Judgment_-_1311969.2024___1311970.2024.pdf).
Mr Paul Thompson v Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service: [2025] EAT 59
Source: gov.uk (2025-04-28)

Employment Appeal Tribunal judgment of Judge Tayler on 28 April 2025.

Read the full judgment in Mr Paul Thompson v Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service: [2025] EAT 59 (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/680f498611d566056bcae91e/Mr_Paul_Thompson_v_Devon_and_Somerset_Fire_and_Rescue_Service__2025__EAT_59.pdf).
Consultation on the Introduction of Electric Vehicle Excise Duty (eVED)
Source: gov.uk (2025-12-02)

A consultation setting out further detail on how eVED will work.

At Budget 2025, the government announced electric Vehicle Excise Duty (eVED): a new mileage charge for electric and plug-in hybrid cars, which will take effect from April 2028. This consultation sets out further detail on how eVED will work and seeks views its design and implementation.

How to respond

This consultation is hosted on an online survey platform called SmartSurvey. To respond to the consultation, please use the following weblink: https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/eVEDconsultation/
ATACPD09255 - National Carnet Unit (NCU): certificates of location - requests from UK ATA Carnet Holders
Source: gov.uk (2025-11-24)


This manual will be archived on 15 December 2025. If there is content within this manual you use regularly, email xxx@xxx.xx (mailto:xxx@xxx.xx) to let us know.

Purpose of requests

ATA Carnet holders will leave a deposit or guarantee with the Chamber of Commerce which sold them the ATA Carnet. In order to have this money refunded they will need to show that the goods have returned to the UK.

If the Carnet was either not stamped or stamped incorrectly on return to the UK the holder may need a certificate of location.

Action by the NCU

Request will be sent by email to the National Carnet Unit (This content has been withheld because of exemptions in the Freedom of Information Act 2000). They will then be sent to the appropriate region for a visit.

Action by Customs officials

A Customs official will contact the Carnet holder and give them the option of bringing the goods to a Customs office for inspection or a visit to their private premises.

Visit to private premises are chargeable in line with Notice 112A Attendance at Private Premises by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC web) (http://customs.hmrc.gov.uk/channelsPortalWebApp/channelsPortalWebApp.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=pageLibrary_PublicNoticesAndInfoSheets&propertyType=document&columns=1&id=HMCE_PROD_010159)

(This content has been withheld because of exemptions in the Freedom of Information Act 2000)

Staff may only issue certificates of location if they have been able to inspect the goods in question. Certificates should not be issued on the basis of photographs or other documentary evidence, please see ATACPD16000 (https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/ata-cpd-carnets/atacpd16000).
Ambulance Quality Indicators Clinical Outcomes for November 2024
Source: gov.uk (2025-04-10)

Monthly clinical outcomes for patients transported by Ambulance Services in England following cardiac arrest, stroke, or heart attack.

For patients transported each month by each of the eleven Ambulance Services in England:

Cardiac arrest: return of spontaneous circulation, survival at 30 days, and receipt of care bundle.

ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), a type of heart attack: time to clinical intervention in hospital, and receipt of care bundle.

Stroke: time to hospital arrival, CT scan, and thrombolysis.

For a sample of patients attended by an Ambulance Service because they have fallen and cannot get up: receipt of appropriate care bundle.

Accredited official statistics are produced impartially and free from political influence.
IEIM905012 - Example 2 - Missing Information in the Initial Period
Source: gov.uk (2025-06-10)


A Reporting Platform Operator (RPO) has reported information to HMRC. The TIN was missing for some of the records. HMRC contacts the RPO who explains that they were unable to obtain a TIN for some sellers as they refused to provide it. Following repeated requests for the TIN from the sellers, the RPO took steps to prevent the sellers from having any further activity on the platform until a TIN was provided. In such a scenario, a penalty is unlikely.
Batt Broadbent Solicitors LLP
Source: gov.uk (2025-11-10)

We, the undersigned, commit to honour the Armed Forces Covenant and support the Armed Forces Community. We recognise the value Serving Personnel, both Regular and Reservists, Veterans and military families contribute to our business and our country.

The Armed Forces Covenant

An enduring covenant between the people of the United Kingdom, Her Majesty’s Government and all those who serve or have served in the Armed Forces of the Crown and their families

The first duty of Government is the defence of the realm. Our Armed Forces fulfil that responsibility on behalf of the Government, sacrificing some civilian freedoms, facing danger and, sometimes, suffering serious injury or death as a result of their duty. Families also play a vital role in supporting the operational effectiveness of our Armed Forces. In return, the whole nation has a moral obligation to the members of the Naval Service, the Army and the Royal Air Force, together with their families. They deserve our respect and support, and fair treatment.

Those who serve in the Armed Forces, whether Regular or Reserve, those who have served in the past, and their families, should face no disadvantage compared to other citizens in the provision of public and commercial services. Special consideration is appropriate in some cases, especially for those who have given most such as the injured and the bereaved.

This obligation involves the whole of society: it includes voluntary and charitable bodies, private organisations, and the actions of individuals in supporting the Armed Forces. Recognising those who have performed military duty unites the country and demonstrates the value of their contribution. This has no greater expression than in upholding this Covenant.

Section 1: Principles of the Armed Forces Corporate Covenant

1.1 We Batt Broadbent Solicitors LLP will endeavour in our business dealings to uphold the key principles of the Armed Forces Covenant, which are:
- no member of the Armed Forces Community should face disadvantage in the provision of public and commercial services compared to any other citizen;
- and in some circumstances that special treatment may be appropriate especially for the injured or bereaved.
Section 2: Demonstrating our commitment

2.1 Batt Broadbent Solicitors LLP recognises the value serving personnel, reservists, veterans and military families bring to our business. We will seek to uphold the principles of the Armed Forces Covenant, by pledging to the following:
- Armed Forces Friendly
- UK Service Spouses And Partners
- Flexible Leave For Spouses
- UK Reservists
- Armed Forces Day
- Discounts
2.2 We will publicise these commitments through our literature and/or on our website, setting out how we will seek to honour them and inviting feedback from the Service community and our customers on how we are doing.
Open general export licence (export after exhibition: dual-use items)
Source: gov.uk (2025-08-06)

Licence allowing the export of dual-use items if they have been temporarily imported into the UK for exhibition or demonstration.

This open general export licence (OGEL) allows, subject to certain conditions, the export of dual-use items (has both a civilian and military application) after they have been previously temporarily imported for exhibition or demonstration into the UK, where the exporter is established in the UK.

Revoked licences

The most recently revoked licences are available in the documents section.

You can find older revoked versions of the OGEL (export after exhibition: dual-use items) on the National Archives website (https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/*/https:/www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-general-export-licence-export-after-exhibition-dual-use-items).
PM meeting with Prime Minister Al-Sudani of Iraq: 14 January 2025
Source: gov.uk (2025-01-14)

The Prime Minister met with Prime Minister of Iraq Mohammed Shia' Al-Sudani in Downing Street this afternoon.

The Prime Minister met with Prime Minister of Iraq Mohammed Shia’ Al-Sudani in Downing Street this afternoon.

He welcomed the fact that Iraq has become safer and more prosperous under Prime Minister Al-Sudani’s leadership and said that the UK is keen to assist in building that momentum through a modern and future-looking partnership between the UK and Iraq.

The leaders reflected on the situation in the Middle East and emphasised the importance of supporting peace and stability across the region following recent developments in Syria.

They also welcomed the deepening of bilateral defence ties through the signing of a new joint statement on defence and committed to continuing strong cooperation on counterterrorism.

Turning to economic growth, the Prime Minster welcomed the expanding partnership between the UK and Iraq in this space, as illustrated by the signing of the landmark Partnership and Cooperation Agreement today and the announcement of a £12.3 billion trade package.

On illegal migration, the leaders discussed their intent to work towards a new and ambitious returns agreement between the UK and Iraq. They welcomed the progress on border security made during the Home Secretary’s visit to Iraq in November and committed to working even more closely to disrupt people smuggling networks.

The leaders agreed to remain in close touch and looked forward to further strengthening the relationship between their two countries in the coming years.
First Ascent Group Ltd
Source: gov.uk (2025-11-10)

We, the undersigned, commit to honour the Armed Forces Covenant and support the Armed Forces Community. We recognise the value Serving Personnel, both Regular and Reservists, Veterans and military families contribute to our business and our country.

The Armed Forces Covenant

An enduring covenant between the people of the United Kingdom, Her Majesty’s Government and all those who serve or have served in the Armed Forces of the Crown and their families

The first duty of Government is the defence of the realm. Our Armed Forces fulfil that responsibility on behalf of the Government, sacrificing some civilian freedoms, facing danger and, sometimes, suffering serious injury or death as a result of their duty. Families also play a vital role in supporting the operational effectiveness of our Armed Forces. In return, the whole nation has a moral obligation to the members of the Naval Service, the Army and the Royal Air Force, together with their families. They deserve our respect and support, and fair treatment.

Those who serve in the Armed Forces, whether Regular or Reserve, those who have served in the past, and their families, should face no disadvantage compared to other citizens in the provision of public and commercial services. Special consideration is appropriate in some cases, especially for those who have given most such as the injured and the bereaved.

This obligation involves the whole of society: it includes voluntary and charitable bodies, private organisations, and the actions of individuals in supporting the Armed Forces. Recognising those who have performed military duty unites the country and demonstrates the value of their contribution. This has no greater expression than in upholding this Covenant.

Section 1: Principles of the Armed Forces Corporate Covenant

1.1 We First Ascent Group Ltd will endeavour in our business dealings to uphold the key principles of the Armed Forces Covenant, which are:
- no member of the Armed Forces Community should face disadvantage in the provision of public and commercial services compared to any other citizen;
- and in some circumstances that special treatment may be appropriate especially for the injured or bereaved.
Section 2: Demonstrating our commitment

2.1 First Ascent Group Ltd recognises the value serving personnel, reservists, veterans and military families bring to our business. We will seek to uphold the principles of the Armed Forces Covenant, by pledging to the following:
- Armed Forces Friendly
- UK Service Veterans And Leavers
- UK Service Spouses And Partners
- Flexible Leave For Spouses
- UK Reservists
- UK Cadets
- Armed Forces Day
- Discounts
We also pledge the following:

-Working with the Career Transition Partnership (CTP), in order to establish a tailored employment pathway for Service Leavers

2.2 We will publicise these commitments through our literature and/or on our website, setting out how we will seek to honour them and inviting feedback from the Service community and our customers on how we are doing.
Mr S Priest v Staffordshire Fire & Rescue Service: 6006035/2024
Source: gov.uk (2025-01-31)

Employment Tribunal decision.

Read the full decision in Mr S Priest v Staffordshire Fire & Rescue Service: 6006035/2024 - Dismissal (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/679b937b6bb4c44f0805e810/Mr_S_Priest_v_Staffordshire_Fire___Rescue_Service_6006035_2024.pdf).
Mr M Bentley v The Commissioner for HM Revenue and Customs: 2410176/2022
Source: gov.uk (2025-11-03)

Employment Tribunal decision.

Read the full decision in Mr M Bentley v The Commissioner for HM Revenue and Customs: 2410176/2022 - Judgment (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6904c9c819a898f0b18980bd/Martin_Bentley_v_The_Commissioners_for_His_Majesty_s_Revenue_and_Customs__2410176_2022...pdf).

Read the full decision in Mr M Bentley v The Commissioner for HM Revenue and Customs: 2410176/2022 - Reasons (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/670fd9ec30536cb9274832fa/Martin_Bentley_v_The_Commissioners_for_His_Majesty_s_Revenue_and_Customs_2410176_2022_.pdf).

Read the full decision in Mr M Bentley v The Commissioner for HM Revenue and Customs: 2410176/2022 - Judgment (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67a3839f567402152f553c93/Mr_M_Bentley_v_The_Commissioners_for_His_Majesty_s_Revenue_and_Customs_-_2410176_2022_-_Costs.pdf).
129 the Crescent, Dunscroft,  Doncaster DN7 4ES : MAN/00CE/HIN/2024/0043
Source: gov.uk (2025-12-10)

Northern Region Judge J Oliver and Tribunal Member Mrs S Kendall sitting on 30 July 2025

Read the full decision in 129 the Crescent, Dunscroft, Doncaster DN7 4ES : MAN/00CE/HIN/2024/0043 (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/690c5c9d88a98da87e292395/129_The_Crescent_Dunscroft_doncaster_Improvement_Notice_4.8.25.pdf)
UK Soft Power Council, January 2025: minutes
Source: gov.uk (2025-02-28)

Abridged minutes from the UK Soft Power Council's first meeting on 15 January 2025.

The UK Soft Power Council (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-soft-power-council-membership-and-terms-of-reference) is an advisory board to the UK government. The Council held its inaugural meeting on 15 January 2025, in London.
RFIG21590 - Statutory Residence Test (SRT): Temporary non-residence: Remitted foreign income
Source: gov.uk (2025-04-04)


From 6 April 2025 it is not possible to use the remittance basis of taxation, however, any foreign income or gains that have arisen to a former remittance basis user prior to this date will continue to be taxed at the usual tax rates if they are remitted to the UK on or after 6 April 2025.

Where an individual:
- used the remittance basis prior to 6 April 2025
- remits pre-6 April 2025 relevant foreign income to the UK during the period in which they are temporarily non-resident
they will be treated as having remitted that relevant foreign income to the UK in the period of their return. This replaces and updates the existing temporary non-residence charge. RDRM32510 (https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/residence-domicile-and-remittance-basis/rdrm32510) contains details of the rules.

Example

Marie returned to the UK during the tax year 2018-2019 after a period of residence abroad.

She originally left the UK to become resident abroad on 2 September 2013 (end of period A), and so her year of departure was 2013-2014. She had been resident in the UK for the 7 years before her departure and claimed the remittance basis in those years.

While Marie was resident abroad she remitted to the UK the following relevant foreign income (RFI):
- £15,000 RFI from 2009-2010 remitted in 2014-2015
- £18,000 RFI from 2010-2011 remitted in 2014-2015
- £18,000 RFI from 2011-2012 remitted in 2015-2016
- £20,000 RFI from 2012-2013 remitted in 2016-2017
Total £71,000

As she was not resident in the UK, this income was not taxed when remitted here.

On her return to the UK on 1 June 2018, (the beginning of the UK part of split year 2018-2019), Marie is within the special rules, because her period of temporary non-residence was less than 5 years. She will be liable to UK tax on these earlier remittances which took place when she was temporarily non-resident. They will be chargeable to UK tax in 2018-2019, the tax year of her return.
Chapter 08 – appendix FM family members: caseworker guidance
Source: gov.uk (2025-11-11)

Immigration staff guidance on dealing with family applications.

UK Visas and Immigration guidance on how staff handle applications from families applying after 9 July 2012 under the Immigration Rules, chapter 8, appendix FM.

We are aware that this publication may have accessibility issues. We are working on an accessible version.

Read more about our accessible documents policy (https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office/about/accessible-documents-policy).
2-4, 6-11, 13-15, 18-20, 22 and 26 Park View Mobile Home Park (also known as Park Garages), Lymm Road, Agden Brow, WA13 0UA: MAN/00EQ/PHI/2023/0103-0114, 0116-0120
Source: gov.uk (2025-07-02)

Northern Region Judge L.F McLean and Tribunal Member S. Wanderer Sitting on 29 February 2024

Read the full decision in 2-4, 6-11, 13-15, 18-20, 22 and 26 Park View Mobile Home Park (also known as Park Garages), Lymm Road, Agden Brow, WA13 0UA: MAN/00EQ/PHI/2023/0103-0114, 0116-0120 (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6807cb4d4dd7e0f8897a61c6/MAN00EQPHI20230103_Parkview_Park_pitch_fee_Decision.pdf)
J Bruce v St Philips Care Caledonia Ltd: 8001715/2024
Source: gov.uk (2025-07-17)

Employment Tribunal decision.

Read the full decision in J Bruce v St Philips Care Caledonia Ltd: 8001715/2024 - Strike Out (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6877ad880263c35f52e4dc9a/J_Bruce_v_St_Philips_Care_Caledonia_Limited_-_8001715.2024_-_Strike_Out_Judgment.pdf).
Ms A L Satchell v Women Acting in Today's Society (W.A.I.T.S): 1302624/2023
Source: gov.uk (2025-04-14)

Employment Tribunal decision.

Read the full decision in Ms A L Satchell v Women Acting in Today’s Society (W.A.I.T.S): xx-xxxx-xxxx - Partial Strike Out (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/647f39f6103ca6000c039a1c/Ms_A_L_Satchell_v_Women_Acting_in_Today_s_Society__W.A.I.T.S__-_1302624_2023_-_Part_Strike_Out.pdf).

Read the full decision in Ms A L Satchell v Women Acting in Today’s Society (W.A.I.T.S): xx-xxxx-xxxx - Strike Out (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67f6695ee3c60873d6c90dca/Ms_A_L_Satchell_v_Women_Acting_in_Today_s_Society__W.A.I.T.S____-_1302624_2023_-_Strike_Out.pdf).
Kriss Morrison Cooper Independent Funeral Director Ltd
Source: gov.uk (2025-11-10)

We, the undersigned, commit to honour the Armed Forces Covenant and support the Armed Forces Community. We recognise the value Serving Personnel, both Regular and Reservists, Veterans and military families contribute to our business and our country.

The Armed Forces Covenant

An enduring covenant between the people of the United Kingdom, Her Majesty’s Government and all those who serve or have served in the Armed Forces of the Crown and their families

The first duty of Government is the defence of the realm. Our Armed Forces fulfil that responsibility on behalf of the Government, sacrificing some civilian freedoms, facing danger and, sometimes, suffering serious injury or death as a result of their duty. Families also play a vital role in supporting the operational effectiveness of our Armed Forces. In return, the whole nation has a moral obligation to the members of the Naval Service, the Army and the Royal Air Force, together with their families. They deserve our respect and support, and fair treatment.

Those who serve in the Armed Forces, whether Regular or Reserve, those who have served in the past, and their families, should face no disadvantage compared to other citizens in the provision of public and commercial services. Special consideration is appropriate in some cases, especially for those who have given most such as the injured and the bereaved.

This obligation involves the whole of society: it includes voluntary and charitable bodies, private organisations, and the actions of individuals in supporting the Armed Forces. Recognising those who have performed military duty unites the country and demonstrates the value of their contribution. This has no greater expression than in upholding this Covenant.

Section 1: Principles of the Armed Forces Corporate Covenant

1.1 We Kriss Morrison Cooper Independent Funeral Director Ltd will endeavour in our business dealings to uphold the key principles of the Armed Forces Covenant, which are:
- no member of the Armed Forces Community should face disadvantage in the provision of public and commercial services compared to any other citizen;
- and in some circumstances that special treatment may be appropriate especially for the injured or bereaved.
Section 2: Demonstrating our commitment

2.1 Kriss Morrison Cooper Independent Funeral Director Ltd recognises the value serving personnel, reservists, veterans and military families bring to our business. We will seek to uphold the principles of the Armed Forces Covenant, by pledging to the following:
- Armed Forces Friendly
- UK Service Veterans And Leavers
- UK Service Spouses And Partners
- Flexible Leave For Spouses
- UK Reservists
- UK Cadets
- Armed Forces Day
- Reserve Forces Day
- Discounts
- Armed Forces Charities
- UK Wounded, Injured And Sick
2.2 We will publicise these commitments through our literature and/or on our website, setting out how we will seek to honour them and inviting feedback from the Service community and our customers on how we are doing.
AAIB Record-only UAS investigations reviewed: October - November 2024
Source: gov.uk (2025-01-09)

This is a list of AAIB Record-only UAS investigations that were reviewed during October - November 2024.

When an accident or incident is reported to the AAIB it can be classified as Formal, Field, Correspondence or Record Only investigation. Further information regarding the first three types of investigation can be found on our How we investigate page. (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/how-we-investigate/how-we-investigate)

An occurrence that is classified as being ‘Record Only’ is one that if investigated fully has little likelihood of identifying new safety lessons that will advance aviation safety.

This process of gathering and analysis of information is being carried out initially by the Duty Co-ordinator from the notification and will make a conclusion to ‘record only’ if there is enough information in order to analyse and draw a conclusion. If there is not enough information at notification stage, then a form is sent to the pilot in order to gather more information for analysis and a decision on whether a fuller investigation is needed.

The occurrence details are reviewed and recorded in tabular format and published bimonthly online and in the March, May, July, September, November and January Bulletins.

Details of previous record-only investigations can be found on the Record-only investigations page. (https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/aaib-record-only-investigations)