Beach huts
Source: gov.uk (2025-04-28)

This publication is intended for Valuation Officers. It may contain links to internal resources that are not available through this version.

1. Scope

1.1 This section covers beach huts.

1.2 There are a range of beach hut types ranging from the traditional timber hut type to pvc or purpose built of concrete/ brick situated in blocks, either single or double storey. Structures may be permanently on the pitch or removed in winter for storage.

1.3 Generally, daily or weekly let units will be too transient to form separate assessments, but annual or longer lettings should usually be separate assessments in their own right.

1.4 Large blocks of huts retained by a Local Authority for weekly/daily letting are often included in the appropriate cumulo foreshore assessments. Alternatively the blocks may be assessed as a single unit subject to the principles of. Woolway (VO) v Mazars. [2015] RA 373 and The Rating (Property in Common Occupation) and Council Tax (Empty Dwellings) Act 2018.

1.5 Occupation is invariably subject to restrictions imposed by the local authority or landowner, both precluding their use as overnight accommodation (normally between 10 pm and 6 am) and restricting the use to which the hut can be put. Most beach huts will be purely day huts which cannot be used for overnight stays and offer only the most basic of facilities and generally do not have mains services connected.

1.6 Usually beach huts will be located on the seafront at resorts but some may be more remote. Private shelters or huts used by fishermen or hill walkers should not normally be treated as beach huts.

2. List description, codes and suffix

2.1 Description in the rating list should normally be ‘beach hut and premises’ - individual huts

Bulk Class: miscellaneous

Primary description code: LH1

Scat Code: 022

Scat Code suffix: G

3. Responsible teams

3.1 This is a generalist class of property and as such will be dealt with by the Regional Valuation Units.

4. Co-ordination arrangements

4.1 The Leisure Class Co-ordination team has overall responsibility for the co-ordination of this class.

5. Legal framework

5.1 Identifying the hereditament

5.1.1 The hereditament will usually comprise the beach hut and its site.

5.1.2 Generally, each privately owned or occupied beach hut comprises a separate hereditament if the occupation is not transient e.g. an annual licence or longer interest. The description in the rating list will be ‘Beach hut and premises’.

5.1.3 Where a local authority or other landlord retains paramount control over two or more contiguous beach huts then they should be assessed together as a single hereditament; i.e. this will be the weekly or daily lettings. These are to be treated as multiple units. Description ‘ beach huts (number) and premises.’

5.2 Licence fees - used as evidence of value

Street v Mountford (1985) 274 EG 821 HL

5.2.1 Determined that the distinction between a licence and a lease or any other tenancy depends on the truth of the relationship between the parties involved, not the label which they choose to put upon it. In other words it does not matter if a lease or licence exists it is the length of the agreement that is important as to its rateability.

5.2.2 ‘Licences that do not on the face of it appear to give rise to exclusive occupation of land should be considered alongside the facts as they present themselves on the ground. In other words, paramount control and the practical outworking of the licence should be explored, to confirm if exercise of the right effectively achieves rateable occupation of the land over which it is exercised.’

i.e. the fact that the premises is held on a licence and not a lease is not relevant.

5.3 Seasonal use

Southend on sea v Wren 1900 64 JP 7

5.3.1 Whilst the property may only be used for part of the year e.g. a seasonal use, the agreement is for 12 months, as per the hypothetical tenancy, and therefore the rent paid reflects the fact that for part of the year the hypothetical tenant does not make use of the property.

5.3.2 So no adjustment is to be made re the annual licence that the hut may only be occupied for part of the year. i.e. the site rent reflects the seasonality of the unit.

5.4 Domestic / non-domestic borderline

5.4.1 Having correctly identified the unit of assessment, the non-domestic / domestic borderline has to be considered.

5.4.2 Domestic

5.4.3 ‘Domestic Property’ is defined in s.66(1)(a) and (b) Local Government Finance Act 1988 (LGFA 1988) i.e. S66 definition of domestic property.

(1) Subject to subsections (2) (2b) and (2e) below, the property is domestic if

a) It is used wholly for the purpose of living accommodation

b) It is a yard, garden outhouse or other appurtenance belonging to or enjoyed with property falling within para (a) above

c) It is a private garage which either has a floor area of 25sqm or less or is used wholly or mainly for the accommodation of a private motor vehicle or

d) It is private storage premises used wholly or mainly for the storage of articles of domestic use

5.4.4 1. Property is domestic if “it is used wholly for purposes living accommodation” or alternatively is an “other appurtenance”.

5.4.5 Use for domestic purposes (even for part of the year) should be considered at the material day.

5.4.6 In Lewis v Christchurch Borough Council 1996 RA229 the High Court found that the beach huts (including the site) formed separate hereditaments and refuted the suggestion that the hut was removable or that the huts should be assessed as one unit of assessment. On the facts in this case the huts were found to be ‘Domestic Property’ as they were “used wholly for the purposes of living accommodation.”

5.4.7 Where a beach hut is wholly used for the purposes of living accommodation in that it provides sleeping and other facilities for living, with or without mains services, it will be treated as a cabin or chalet used as a holiday home and hence ‘Domestic Property’, falling to be assessed for Council Tax with a corresponding entry in the Council Tax List. Should VO’s have difficulty in deciding whether the facilities provided fall within this category reference should be made to the relevant Technical Advisor.

5.4.8 Appurtenance

5.4.9 In some cases the beach hut may be situated within the grounds of a dwelling or block of flats.

5.4.10 The definition of ‘Domestic Property’ as per section 1(b) LGFA 1988 includes “garden, outhouse and other appurtenances” that are within the curtilage of the domestic accommodation.

5.4.11 In Martin & Others v Hewitt (VO) 2003 RA 275 the President of the Lands Tribunal (having concluded that the word ‘appurtenance’ in sub-section (1)(b) LGFA 1988 should be given its ‘common law’ definition) stated:

“in my view, there is a clear indication that “appurtenance” in section 66(1)(b)[LGFA1988] was not intended to encompass land or buildings lying outside the curtilage of the property referred to in section 66(1)(a)” [LGFA1988].

5.4.12 Whether a Beach Hut is properly described as an ‘other appurtenance’ must always depend very much on the particular facts and circumstances in each case.

5.4.13 To satisfy 1(b) a number of considerations will have to be taken into account.

a) does it pass in a conveyance of the principal subject matter (i.e. the dwelling house, flat etc.) without being specifically mentioned in the conveyance

b) the natural curtilage - e.g. presence of fences, hedges etc - i.e. what would naturally fall with the demise

c) layout and disposition of the dwelling

d) degree of propinquity - i.e. closeness to dwelling

e) physical connection

f) shared facilities eg common access, services etc

g) user of land and buildings - look at all the facts, use and title deeds, registration etc.

5.4.14 To be considered as an appurtenance the hut must fall within the curtilage of the dwelling. If it is outside this then the hut will not be domestic property and will be subject to non-domestic rating.

5.4.15 Private Storage Premises – s66(1)(d) LGFA 1988

5.4.16 A beach hut will not be “private storage premises used wholly or mainly for the storage of articles of domestic use” within section 66 (1)(d) of the LGFA 1988.

5.4.17 In Alford v Thompson (VO) (unreported), [Beach Hut 4, Hordle Cliff, Lymington, Hampshire] the Lands Tribunal found as a matter of fact that swim wear, deck chairs, cutlery etc. were not articles of domestic use but articles of recreational use used in connection with the enjoyment of the beach. Moreover, the beach hut was a sui generis use. Its use had been agreed as ‘private’, but these were not ‘private storage premises’, as the words “wholly or mainly” connoted storage for its own sake, and did not include storage as an adjunct of the recreational use of the beach hut in connection with the beach.

5.4.18 The Lands Tribunal stated that the crucial part of section 66(1)(d) LGFA 1988 was that in so far as the beach hut was used for storage, it would have had to be used ‘wholly or mainly’ for the storage of articles of domestic use. The evidence showed that any articles stored in the beach hut were ‘wholly or mainly’ for use in connection with the enjoyment of the recreational use of the beach hut and the beach.

5.4.19 In deciding whether any articles stored in a ‘private storage premises’ are ‘articles of domestic use’ it should be noted that the word “Domestic” is derived from the Latin “domus” which means “home”. Moreover, in Martin & Others v Hewitt (VO) [see para 4.2 above] the President of the Lands Tribunal had difficulty in seeing that the storage in premises quite separate from the house of things to be used for recreation away from the house could constitute articles of domestic use. Scottish case law was distinguished on this point.

5.4.20 Non-domestic property

5.4.21 If the property does not qualify as domestic property under s66 LGFA88 then it is non-domestic property and has to be valued accordingly.

6. Survey requirements

6.1 Single huts

site plan showing location

measurement - GEA - verandas or decking - note as other additions

characteristics - age, construction , condition

position - location on front eg set back, proximity to facilities eg if adjoining cafes/ toilets etc

services - provided, availability of car parking

licence fee details noting whether rates, services, VAT, payments for chattels (e.g. chairs and equipment) are included in the payment.

Restrictions regarding use plus details of any closures due to regular ‘events’ that may be held in the vicinity affecting the use and enjoyment of the hut. eg temporary closures of the promenade for events. such as marathons, air shows, etc.

6.2 Multiple huts
- in addition to the above, details of receipts and expenditures
- details of total number of huts, other facilities for example ice cream/ticket kiosk etc.
- details of how the operation is run, seasonality details
- details of any voids etc and length of season
7. Survey capture

7.1 Beach huts are normally data captured as miscellaneous bulk class on the CDB.

7.2 Use code BH1

7.3 Area/use code - 1 (number of units)

7.4 Line description - should show size of hut and state if site or site and hut

7.5 Other additions include area of verandas etc record area per sqm.

7.6 Remarks - enter site/hut size and any other remarks re location/position/facilities such as water, electricity and car parking

8. Valuation approach

8.1 Method of valuation

8.2 The preferred method of valuation is by reference to rentals where sufficient evidence exists. Although a hybrid contractor’s approach to valuation can be adopted. The rentals method should be the preferred method where possible.

8.3 There will however be few, if any, open market rents which accord with the statutory definition of rateable value and payments may need adjustment, e.g. to exclude payments for rates, services, equipment etc. Nevertheless, some rental evidence will usually exist upon which a basis of valuation can be established.

8.4 Tone of list

8.5 In Marks v Easthaugh (VO) 1993 RA 11 the Lands Tribunal rejected the argument of the Valuation Officer that the assessment of a beach hut should follow the ‘tone of the list’ since, at the material day, no tone was established. The facts in Easthaugh are unusual as neither party directly addressed this issue and there was no legal representation.

8.6 In a later case, Jafton Properties Ltd v Prisk (VO) 1997 RA 137, the Lands Tribunal fully considered legal points on when a ‘tone of the list’ was established and held that whether a ‘tone’ has become established must be determined at the date of the hearing and not the material day.

8.7 When considering tone of the list, Marks v Easthaugh (VO) should not be followed and VOs should have regard to the principles as set out in the Jafton Properties Ltd v Prisk (VO) case.

8.8 Site rents

8.9 Ample local evidence will exist of annual rents paid for a beach hut site subject to a licence agreement. These licences will normally stipulate the specification of the hut to be erected and any restrictions on its use. It should be established if the payment is for the site and hut or site alone.

8.10 Seasonal lettings

8.11 Many huts will be let for the normal summer season but payments received will generally include amounts for rates, repairs, management and possibly chattels and services. After adjustment these payments will represent the closest approximation of annual value on the assumption that the value of beach huts during the winter months is likely to be nominal.

8.12 Daily/weekly lettings

8.13 This evidence is unlikely to provide any assistance as such lettings are likely to relate to the peak season and not therefore representative of an annual rent.

8.14 Contractors basis

8.15 In Marks v Easthaugh, (see paragraph 8.2 above) the Lands Tribunal having rejected the Valuation Officer’s evidence was obliged to have regard to the valuation evidence presented by the ratepayer. This comprised site rent of the subject property with an additional value for the hut arrived at on a contractor’s basis.

8.16 Notwithstanding that this approach has been adopted in some localities it is considered that valuation by reference to rents, where available, provides a more reliable basis and is to be preferred.

8.17 Other

8.18 Huts used for weddings and other events - please refer to author or technical advisor for Guidance - however, details of how they are used plus receipts/expenditure etc. will be required

8.19 Multiple huts (non-foreshore assessments)

8.20 Will possibly be valued in relation to receipts.

9. Valuation support
- Survaid
- Class Co-ordination team
Practice note: 2023 - beach huts

1. Market appraisal

In many locations beach huts are still very popular. This is especially so in traditional seaside resorts where Council waiting lists are typically 10 to 20 years.

The increase in popularity have seen some huts hitting headlines with sales well over £320,000. This is exceptional and capital values will not assist in arriving at a value for rating purposes other than to demonstrate high demand. Generally local authorities charge a site rent and the occupier places their own hut on the site, or the site and hut are let together reflecting location and the facilities available such as water, electricity and parking. Some authorities do however adopt varying approaches based solely on size regardless of location or on length of frontage as an alternative method.

The approach adopted in this class for revaluation reflects both the size, type and location within a single annual rental sum.

2. Changes from last practice note

There are no significant changes to the previous practice notes for 2017.

3. Ratepayer discussions

There are no national organisations relevant to this class of property. However, there are many local beach hut associations and some liaison could be made with these groups.

4. Valuation scheme

4.1 Method of valuation

The preferred method to valuation is by rentals approach.

Rental values will vary from location to location and the local authority or land owners for example National Trust are likely to be able to provide details of their lettings for both site rents and for the hire of a beach huts. Plenty of evidence is also freely available on the internet.

If the local authority charge a lower site rent to local residents then a reasonably expected rent is likely to exceed this, however may be less than the rent paid by non-residents depending on local demand.

The VO should request details of each authority’s policy towards beach hut lettings as valuer judgement will be needed when considering the range of charges levied. Demand indicated by high rentals, capital values or long waiting lists needs to be considered and weighed against lower values with concessions for local residents.

During co-ordination, neighbouring authorities may have differing site rents, and these should be balanced carefully when ascertaining the open market rental value.

When considering the evidence i.e. annual rents/ fees - adjustments may be made for:

Annual Fee X

Less

I. VAT

II. maintenance -repairing liability reflects construction of the hut & degree of exposure

III. insurance

IV. rates

V. other services and equipment e.g. furniture, etc.

NET FEE Y

Y = RV subject to rounding rules.

in order to determine the annual hypothetical rent applicable to the unit (hut and land).

In some cases, beach huts may be valued using a hybrid contractor’s approach, site rent + annual equivalent cost of hut

I. site rent - X

II. cost price of hut

III. ground works

IV. erection costs

V. decapitalise ii) + iii) + iv) = Z

VI. Rateable Value = X + Z

4.2 Scheme descriptions

It is intended that the scheme for beach huts reflects the size and location of the huts together with any other amenities e.g. verandas, patios etc. It does not include huts used for overnight accommodation. These facts should be clearly stated in the scheme descriptions

4.3 Multiple huts

Where there is a hereditament comprising multiple huts which the operator lets individual huts on a daily or weekly basis, often there will be a ticket kiosk or ice-cream kiosk as well.

In these cases, the receipts should be obtained. If full accounts are not available then a suitable percentage of fair maintainable gross receipts should be adopted for valuation purposes, this should exclude VAT. As the demand for beach huts remains high, as evidenced by the long waiting lists, it is not thought that any deductions should be made. Further guidance is available from the CCT members.

If there are a number of separately assessed blocks, for which accounts are not available, typically council owned ones, then these should be valued adopting the prevailing levels for the area with no allowance for management or voids as due to the high demand for such units it is thought such deductions are not appropriate for this type of holding.

4.4 Huts in Council Foreshore cumulo assessments

These will normally be included in the accounts on which the cumulo assessment is based as these will reflect the management costs and voids. The accounts may include other costs which would need to be disregarded e.g. management, voids etc. of huts not included within that hereditament as they are separately assessed for rating purposes.

Practice note 1: 2017 - beach huts

1. Market appraisal

In many locations beach huts are still very popular despite the recession. This is especially so in traditional seaside resorts where Council waiting lists are typically 10-20 years.

The increase in popularity have seen some huts hitting headlines with sales well over £120,000. Unfortunately capital values will not assist in arriving at a value for rating purposes other than to demonstrate high demand.

Generally local authorities charge a site rent and the occupier places their own hut on the site or the site and hut are let together reflecting location. Some authorities do however adopt varying approaches based solely on size regardless of location or on length of frontage as an alternative method.

The approach adopted in this class for revaluation reflects both the size, type and location within a single annual rental sum.

2. Changes from the last practice note

There are no significant changes to the previous practice notes for 2010.

3. Ratepayer discussions

There are no national organisations relevant to this class of property. However there are many local beach hut associations and some liaison should be made with these groups.

4. Valuation scheme

4.1 Method of valuation

The preferred method to valuation is by rentals approach.

Rental values will vary from location to location and the local authority or land owners e.g. National Trust are likely to be able to provide details of their lettings for both site rents and for the hire of beach huts. Plenty of evidence is also freely available on the Internet.

If the local authority charge a lower site rent to local residents then a reasonably expected rent is likely to exceed this but may be less than the rent paid by non-residents depending on local demand.

The VO should request details of each authority’s policy towards beach hut lettings as valuer judgement will be needed when considering the range of charges levied. Demand indicated by high rentals, capital values or long waiting lists needs to be considered and weighed against lower values with concessions for local residents.

During co-ordination neighbouring authorities may have differing site rents and these should be balanced carefully when ascertaining the open market rental value.

Huts should be individually assessed if let on annual licences/leases or longer periods.

When considering the evidence i.e. annual rents/ fees - adjustments should be made for:-

Annual Fee X

Less

I. VAT ii. maintenance -repairing liability reflects construction of the hut & degree of exposure iii. insurance iv. rates v. other services and equipment e.g. furniture, etc

Net free Y

Y = RV subject to rounding rules.

In order to determine the annual hypothetical rent applicable to the unit (hut and land).

In some cases beach huts may be valued using a shortened contractors approach.

4.2 Consideration of costs where limited rental evidence

Site + annual equivalent cost of Hut I. site rent - X ii. cost price of hut iii. ground works iv. erection costs v. decapitalise ii) + iii) + iv) = Z vi. Rateable Value = X + Z

4.3 Scheme descriptions

It is intended that the scheme for beach huts reflects the size and location of the huts together with any other amenities e.g. verandas, patios etc. It does not include huts used for overnight accommodation. These facts should be clearly stated in the scheme/matrix descriptions.

4.4 Multiple huts

Where there is a hereditament comprising multiple huts and the operator lets individual huts on a daily or weekly basis, often there will be a ticket kiosk or ice-cream kiosk as well.

In these cases, the receipts should be obtained. If full accounts are not available then a suitable percentage of fair maintainable gross receipts should be adopted for valuation purposes. NB this should exclude VAT.

If there are a number of separately assessed blocks, for which accounts are not available , typically council owned ones - then these should be valued adopting the prevailing levels for the area with no allowance for management or voids as due to the high demand for such units it is thought such deductions are not appropriate for this type of holding.

4.5 Huts in Council Foreshore Cumulo Assessments

These will normally be included in the accounts on which the cumulo assessment is based as these will reflect the management costs and voids. The accounts may include other costs which would need to be disregarded e.g. management, voids etc of huts not included within that hereditament as they are separately assessed for rating purposes.