Legal aid statistics England and Wales bulletin October to December 2017
Source: data.gov.uk (2018-05-25)

Legal Aid Statistics. This dataset provides quarterly aggregated data on overall volume and claim expenditure on the legal aid schemes administered by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) for England and Wales. The reports include statistics on Criminal legal aid covering Police stations, magistrates' courts, Prison Law and the Crown Courts alongside Civil Legal Aid covering Legal Help, family mediation, Civil Representation and exceptional case funding). On an annual cycle further datasets released include Client and provider characteristics, Criminal central funds and higher courts, Appeals and Provider based volume and expenditure figures with geography. All datasets are designed to monitor the workload and expenditure of the legal aid system with further more detailed available than provided in accompanying tables.

Published 29 March 2018 
Legal Aid Statistics quarterly, England and Wales, 
October to December 2017 
Main points 
Crime Lower workload 
down 5% compared to the 
same quarter last year
 
This continues the gradual downward trend of recent 
years. Expenditure on completed work was also  
down by 5%.  
Crown Court completed 
workload down 6% 
compared to the same 
quarter last year 
 
Expenditure on completed work has remained at the 
same level over this period.  
New orders for legal representation in the Crown Court 
continue to decline.   
1% fewer legal help new 
matter starts than in the 
same period of 2016
 
The volume of completed claims also decreased, by 9%, 
and expenditure fell by 10%. 
Mediation Information and 
Assessment Meetings 
were 12% lower than in 
the same quarter of 2016
 
Mediation starts between October and December 2017 
were down by 15% and currently stand at around 1,500, 
the lowest quarterly number of starts since the 
implementation of the LASPO Act. 
20% more certificates 
completed for public 
family law than in the 
same quarter last year
 
 
Expenditure on completed work in this category, which 
already accounts for more than half the total cost of civil 
legal aid, rose by 14% (£14m). 
709 applications for 
Exceptional Case 
Funding received in the 
last quarter
 
This is the highest number of applications received in 
one quarter since the scheme began in April 2013 and a 
60% increase from the same quarter last year.   
This edition comprises the first release of official statistics for the three-month period from 
October to December 2017 and the latest statement of all figures for previous periods. For 
more detailed commentary, and statistics on legal aid providers, Central Funds, appealing 
legal aid decisions and legal aid in the higher courts, please refer to the annual publication.  
For technical detail, please refer to the User guide to legal aid statistics. 
 
We have changed how our quarterly bulletins look, and would welcome any 
feedback using this quick survey. 
For other feedback related to the content of this publication, please let us know at 
xxx@xxx.xx   

2 
 
Things you need to know  
These symbols are used throughout this release to navigate to other documents of interest:  
 
 
 
 
To understand trends in legal aid as a whole, it is best to begin by looking at annual 
expenditure figures and then look at trends in both workload and expenditure for each 
category of legal aid. Summarising activity across the legal aid system meaningfully within a 
single number is difficult because of the diversity of services included, from quicker, lower-
cost provision like pre-charge advice to representation in a complex, high-cost court case.  
Expenditure on legal aid is measured differently for different purposes. A measure that is 
best for analysing the costs of different services, for example, may not be practical for 
managing budgets or payments. The three most often-used measures, shown in Fig. 1, are: 
• 
Closed-case expenditure is the measure used for expenditure figures throughout these 
legal aid statistics. It represents the total value of payments made to legal aid providers 
in relation to pieces of work that are completed in the period. This basis is comparable 
to volumes of completed work to which it relates, and to the same fine level of detail. 
This does not include income received or expenditure in relation to debt write-offs. 
• 
The government budgeting measure known as RDEL (Resource Departmental 
Expenditure Limits) is the main measure used by government to control current 
spending, both to set budgets for future years and report on how much has been spent. 
It represents the value of work carried out in the period better than the closed-case 
measure but cannot be broken down to such a fine level of detail. This measure does 
incorporate income and expenditure in relation to debt. 
• 
Figure 1 shows this budgeting measure both in nominal and real terms. ‘Nominal 
terms’ means not adjusted for inflation; 'real terms' means adjusted for inflation to make 
the value of spending in previous years directly comparable with the specified year.  
These measures show a large reduction in legal aid expenditure from around 2010-11, 
which are mostly due to changes to the scope of civil legal aid introduced by the Legal Aid, 
Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Act from 2013-14, reductions in criminal 
legal aid workloads and reductions in the fees payable to legal aid providers. 
Figure 1: Overall annual legal aid expenditure, by closed-case and RDEL (nominal 
and real-terms) measures (£m), 2005-06 to 2016-17
 
Data visualisation: 
Click for tool allowing 
user-defined charts 
and tables. 
User Guide: 
Click for document 
giving definitions 
and explanations.  
Tables: 
Click for access 
to tables of 
figures. 
Table  
1.0 

3 
 
1. Criminal legal aid 
Main point 
 
Workload and expenditure fell in most areas of criminal legal aid between October and 
December 2017 and the same period of the previous year.   
Criminal legal aid can be categorised into Crime Lower and Crime Higher. Crime Lower 
work includes police station advice, magistrates’ court and prison law. Crime Higher covers 
work in the Crown and Higher Courts. 
 
Figure 2: Crime overview, closed case volumes and expenditure for Oct-Dec 2017, 
and comparison with Oct-Dec 2016 
 
*includes court duty solicitor sessions and virtual courts 
Figure 3: Workload and expenditure in criminal legal aid, Oct-Dec 14 to Oct-Dec 17 
 
Note: Advice and assistance on appeals and civil work associated with crime are excluded from these figures. 
Although Crown Court work comprises a relatively small portion of criminal legal aid in terms 
of volume, it consistently accounts for more than two-thirds of all criminal legal aid 
expenditure. Conversely, advice relating to the police station makes up the largest portion of 
workload but a much smaller proportion of expenditure. 
 
Claim category
Workload 
(% change compared 
to the same quarter 
last year)
Expenditure 
(% change compared 
to the previous 
quarter last year)
Police station advice
150,000 (4%↓)
£31m (4%↓)
Magistrates' courts*
72,000 (9%↓)
£30m (9%↓)
Advice & assistance on appeals
306 (17%↓)
£0.5m (11%↑)
Prison Law
5,000 (2%↑)
£4m (16%↑)
Civil work associated with crime
42 (9%↓)
£0.02m (19%↑)
Solicitor fee scheme
24,000 (7%↓)
£84m (1%↑)
Advocate fee scheme
24,000 (4%↓)
£53m (2%↓)
High Cost crime cases
9 (25%↓)
£6m (12%↓)
Crime
Workload
275,000 (5%↓) 
Expenditure
£209m (2%↓)
Crime Lower 
227,000 (5%↓)  
£66m (5%↓)
Crime Higher  
48,000 (6%↓) 
£143m (0%↔)
Tables  
1.1 and 4.1 

4 
 
 
Police station advice 
This category made up two thirds of the Crime Lower workload between October and 
December 2017 but just less than half of the expenditure. The workload in this period has 
fallen compared to the previous year, down by 5%. This continues the downward trend of 
the last three years, although this trend has not been as steep as the decline for Crime 
Lower as a whole, or overall figures from the Crime Survey for England and Wales1. 
The majority of the police station advice workload, 86% in October to December 2017, 
consists of suspects receiving legal help with a solicitor in attendance at the police station, 
with the rest mainly consisting of legal advice over the telephone.  
 
Applications and grants for representation in the criminal courts   
While figures should be interpreted with caution as they may be revised in subsequent 
quarters as cases move into the Crown Court, the number of orders granted for legally-
aided representation in the magistrates’ court fell by 8% in this quarter when compared to 
the same quarter of the previous year. This continues the downward trend of the last 3 
years, which has been largely driven by Summary Only cases. The overall number of 
receipts in the magistrates’ court2 (including those not involving legal aid) was 5% down 
over the same period. The proportion of these applications that are granted remains stable 
at around 95%.  
Orders granted for legally-aided representation in the Crown Court were also down, by 5% 
this quarter compared to last year, and this was mirrored by a 6% decrease in total Crown 
Court receipts2. Within this, orders relating to Either Way offences fell by 11%, while those 
relating to Indictable offences decreased by 2%. The proportion of Crown Court applications 
granted remains at almost 100%. 
 
Magistrates’ court completed work 
 
Legally-aided representation in the magistrates’ court comprised almost one-third of the 
workload and just under half of expenditure in Crime Lower between October and 
December 2017. The volume of completed work in the magistrates’ court fell 9% this quarter 
when compared to the same period of the previous year. Expenditure also fell by 9% (£3m). 
 
Crown Court completed work  
Volumes of cases completed in the Crown Court have declined over recent years but more 
gradually than new orders, due to longer-running cases still awaiting trial. Completed work 
volumes within the litigator (solicitor) fee scheme were 7% lower in October and 
December 2017 than in the same period of the previous year, driven mainly by a 13% fall in 
cases in which the defendant pleads guilty at their earliest opportunity in the Crown Court. 
This may be due to procedural reforms in the court system, with more defendants pleading 
earlier at the magistrates’ court. In the advocate fee scheme there was a 4% fall compared 
to the same period last year; again, the largest fall was in the guilty plea category. 
Figures for expenditure on work completed in the Crown Court should be interpreted with 
caution as they may be revised in subsequent quarters as claims are assessed further on 
                                               
1www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearending
mar2017 
2 www.gov.uk/government/collections/criminal-court-statistics 
Tables  
2.1 and 2.2 
Tables  
3.1 and 3.2 
Tables  
4.1 – 4.3 
Tables  
2.1 and 2.2 

5 
 
appeal and further payments added to the value of some completed claims. In the litigator 
fee scheme, expenditure was 1% higher in October to December 2017 than in the same 
period of the previous year. In the advocate fee scheme, the value of payments was 2% 
lower than in the same period of the previous year. 
 
Very High-Cost Cases in the Crown Court (VHCCs)  
As announced in the previous edition, we have changed our methodology for statistics on 
VHCCs so that they now report volumes and expenditure on a closed-case basis. This 
makes them more directly comparable with the statistics for other legal aid work in the 
Crown Court and elsewhere, and enables expenditure on the litigator and advocate work in 
VHCCs to be shown separately. More information on this change can be found in the 
Revisions section of the User guide to legal aid statistics. 
VHCCs are those Crown Court cases which, if the case were to proceed to trial, would likely 
last more than 60 days. These cases can span several years and, while they may involve 
small numbers of defendants, the associated expenditure is high in comparison.  
The threshold for cases to be handled as VHCCs has changed over time. Before 2008, an 
expected trial length of more than 25 days would bring a case into the scheme; in July 2010 
this was raised to 40 days, before being raised to the current 60 days in October 2011. 
These changes have reduced the volume of cases handled as VHCCs over this period.  
Figure 4: Completed workload and expenditure in VHCC scheme, 2007-08 to 2016-17 
 
As the left-hand chart of Figure 4 shows, the volume of VHCC starts fell quite rapidly in 
response to these changes, while completions declined more gradually due to the duration 
of these cases. Ten years ago, there were around 500 starts and completions each year; 
this fell by around half once the first change was implemented. The subsequent increase to 
the current 60-day level further reduced the workload to around 50 starts each year. 
The right-hand chart in Figure 4 presents expenditure on VHCCs on the closed-case basis, 
which shows the amount paid over the lifetime of a contract. For comparison, expenditure 
on the previous methodology, which shows the total payments made in the period for work 
on both closed and ongoing contracts (the ‘cash’ basis) is also shown. While the workload 
comprises a tiny proportion of legal aid in the Crown Court overall, the VHCC scheme 
currently represents around 4% of the cost, down from around 15% ten years ago.  
There were 9 defendants represented in the VHCC contracts that concluded in the October 
to December quarter 2017. Expenditure on this work over the duration of the contracts (i.e. 
on the closed-case basis) was £5.9 million. 
Table  
4.4 

6 
 
 
Prison law   
Workload this quarter increased by 2% compared with the same period in the previous year, 
driven by an increase in advocacy at parole board hearings (up 15%). This category 
currently makes up just over one-third of prison law workload, but a much larger proportion 
of costs (74%). Expenditure on prison law rose by 16% over the same period, with all the 
increase due to the parole board rise.  
Despite these increases, prison law work comprised 2% of the volume and 2% of 
expenditure of total criminal legal aid work in October and December 2017; unchanged from 
previous years. 
Tables  
2.1 and 2.2 

7 
 
2. Civil legal aid 
Main point  
 
There were 709 applications for ECF received between October and December 2017. 
This is the highest number of applications received in one quarter since the scheme 
began in April 2013 and a 60% increase from the same quarter last year.   
 
Figure 5: Civil overview, closed case volumes and costs met by the LAA for Oct-Dec 
2017, and comparison with Oct-Dec 2016 
 
 
 
Legal help and controlled legal representation 
In the last quarter, there were 1% fewer legal help new matter starts than in the same period 
of 2016. The volume of completed claims decreased by 9% and expenditure by 10% in 
October to December 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 (figure 6). The 
implementation of the LASPO Act in April 2013 resulted in large reductions in legal help 
workload, with the overall trend falling to less than one-third of pre-LASPO levels.   
 
Figure 6: Completed workload and expenditure in legal help and controlled legal 
representation, Oct-Dec 2014 to Oct-Dec 2017  
 
 
Workload 
(% change 
compared to the 
same quarter last 
year)
Expenditure 
(% change 
compared to the 
same quarter last 
year)
Family Public
22,000 (11%↑)
£115m (13%↑)
Family Private
9,000 (8%↓)
£24m (0%↔)
Mediation and MIAMS*
4,000 (13%↓)
£1m (12%↓)
Immigration
10,000 (9%↓)
£9m (12%↓)
Mental Health
9,000 (2%↓)
£10m (5%↑)
Housing
11,000 (9%↓)
£7m (4%↑)
Other Non-Family
3,000 (3%↓)
£6m (35%↓)
* Not included in family total
Civil
Workload 64,000 
(2%↓) 
Expenditure £172m 
(6%↑)
Family 
31,000 (4%↑)
£139m (11%↑)
Non-Family
33,000 (6%↓)
£33m (10%↓)
Table 1.2 
and 8.1 
Tables  
5.1 – 5.3 

8 
 
Family legal help  
In October to December 2017 family legal help starts increased by 2% compared to the 
same quarter last year. There were decreases in completed claims (16%) and expenditure 
(13%). There was a steep decline in new matters started immediately following the 
implementation of the LASPO Act in April 2013, with a more gradual decline over the last 2 
to 3 years. 
In family mediation, Mediation Information and Assessment Meetings (MIAMs) were down 
by 12% in the last quarter compared to the previous year and currently stand at around a 
third of pre-LASPO levels. Mediation starts between October and December 2017 were 
down by 15% and currently stand at around 1,500, the lowest quarterly number of starts 
since the implementation of the LASPO Act. 
 
Non-family legal help and controlled legal representation  
Legal help and controlled legal representation makes up over 95% of both immigration and 
mental health cases. Controlled legal representation relates to representation at tribunal 
and so is often longer and more costly than legal help but, as with legal help, the decision 
on whether to grant legal aid is delegated to providers.   
The LASPO Act made changes to the scope of legal aid for immigration law, and the areas 
that remain in scope consist largely of asylum-related work. Having fallen by 40% over the 5 
years to 2013-14, new matter starts in immigration stood 10% lower in the October to 
December 2017 quarter than in the same quarter of the previous year. Completed claims in 
immigration were down by 14% in the last quarter compared to the previous year and 
expenditure was also down by 14%. 
Within mental health most funding is spent on providing assistance to sectioned clients 
appealing the terms of their detention before a mental health tribunal. Mental health new 
matter starts fell 2% when comparing the latest quarter to the previous year. Completed 
claims fell by 6% and expenditure fell by 7% over the same period. 
Over 80% of housing work volume is made up of legal help. The volume of this work halved 
between July to September 2012 and April to June 2013. The trend then fluctuated for 
around 18 months but has been gradually falling since 2014. In October to December 2017 
there was a 3% increase in housing work starts compared to the same quarter the previous 
year. There was no change in completed claims and a 3% decrease in expenditure. 
 
Civil representation 
The number of civil representation certificates granted in the last quarter was up 5% 
compared to the same period of the previous year. The number of certificates completed 
increased by 16%, and the associated expenditure increased by 9% in the same period. 
Civil representation workloads fell following the implementation of the LASPO Act in April 
2013 but by a smaller proportion than legal help and controlled legal representation. 
 
 
 
 
 
Tables  
6.1 – 6.10 
Tables 5.1 – 5.3  
and 7.1 – 7.2 
Tables  
5.1 – 5.3 

9 
 
Figure 7: Completed workload and expenditure in civil representation, Oct-Dec 14 to 
Oct-Dec 17 
 
 
Family civil representation  
Certificates granted for family work increased by 5% in October to December 2017 
compared to the previous year. There was an increase in certificates completed (17%) 
compared to the same quarter the previous year, however there has been a small fall 
compared to July to September 2017. The associated expenditure follows a similar pattern 
(11% increase compared to the same quarter the previous year and a 1% decrease 
compared to the previous quarter). This increase was largely due to public family law, 
which makes up around three quarters of family workload and over 80% of family 
expenditure. Certificates completed in public family law have fallen slightly after the peak in 
April to June 2017.  
In October to December 2017, applications for civil representation in private family law 
supported by evidence of domestic abuse increased by 3% compared to the same period 
of the previous year. The number granted also increased (up 4%) compared to the same 
period of 2016. The proportion of applications granted remained steady at around 70% from 
the inception of this type of application until the end of 2015, before increasing to around 
80%. In the latest quarter it was 78%. 
 
 
Non-family civil representation  
Non-family certificates completed make up just over 10% of the total civil representation 
workload and expenditure. There are only a small number of immigration and mental 
health cases in civil representation as most work in these areas consists of controlled legal 
representation. The majority of the certificates completed in this category are for housing 
work. There has been a gradual decline in housing certificates completed and in 
expenditure on this category since 2014, but in the latest period there were 8% more than in 
the same period of the previous year. 
 
Judicial reviews  
Of all civil representation applications granted, around 3,000 a year relate to judicial review. 
The number granted in October to December 2017 was 10% higher than in the same 
quarter in 2016. A third of judicial reviews were for immigration cases and another third 
were for public law.   
Tables  
6.1 – 6.10 
Tables  
6.1 – 6.7 

10 
 
Exceptional Case Funding (ECF)   
There were 709 applications for ECF received from October to December 2017. This is the 
highest number of applications received in a single quarter since the scheme began in April 
2013 and a 60% increase from the same quarter last year. 602 (85%) of these were new 
applications. 
Of the 709 ECF applications received between October and December 2017, 90% (635) 
had been determined by the LAA as of 20 February 2018. 54% (343) of these were granted, 
26% (167) were refused and 17% (107) rejected (see figure 8).  
Among the ECF applications received between October and December 2017, immigration 
(60%), inquest (16%), and family (15%) remained the most requested categories of law 
(figure 8).  The increase in ECF applications over the last two years is driven by an increase 
in immigration applications. 
Figure 8: Volume of ECF applications received and ECF determinations by outcome, 
Oct-Dec 2014 to Oct-Dec 2017 
 
 
 
 
Tables  
8.1 and 8.2 

11 
 
3. Further information 
This publication presents quarterly data trends. For figures published annually, including 
those on providers of legal aid, appealing legal aid decisions, Central Funds, butterfly charts 
and legal aid in the higher courts, please refer to our annual publication. 
Accompanying files 
As well as this bulletin, the following products are published as part of this release: 
• 
Tables: A set of tables, which give further detail and full timeseries for each 
area. 
• 
More detailed data: A detailed file to allow detailed analysis provided in both 
.csv (comma separated values) and .ods (OpenDocument Spreadsheet) formats 
• 
Data visualisation tool: A web-based tool allowing the user to view and 
customize charts and tables based on the published statistics. 
• 
Index of data in Legal aid statistics: An index to the more detailed data 
published in the .csv and .ods files, lists of available data from Legal Aid systems 
and guidance on how to work with the more detailed data using pivot tables. 
• 
User Guide to legal aid statistics: This provides comprehensive information 
about data sources and quality as well as key legislative changes. 
National Statistics status 
National Statistics status means that official statistics meet the highest 
standards of trustworthiness, quality and public value. 
All official statistics should comply with all aspects of the Code of Practice for 
Official Statistics. They are awarded National Statistics status following an 
assessment by the Authority’s regulatory arm. The Authority considers whether 
the statistics meet the highest standards of Code compliance, including the value they add 
to public decisions and debate. 
It is the Ministry of Justice’s responsibility to maintain compliance with the standards 
expected for National Statistics. If we become concerned about whether these statistics are 
still meeting the appropriate standards, we will discuss any concerns with the Authority 
promptly. National Statistics status can be removed at any point when the highest standards 
are not maintained, and reinstated when standards are restored. 
Contact 
Press enquiries should be directed to the Ministry of Justice press office: 
Tel: xx-xxxx-xxxx 
Email: xxx@xxx.xx  
Other enquiries about these statistics should be directed to the Justice Statistics Analytical 
Services division of the Ministry of Justice: 
Richard Field, Head of legal aid statistics  
Ministry of Justice, 7th Floor, 102 Petty France, London, SW1H 9AJ 
Email: xxx@xxx.xx  Tel: xx-xxxx-xxxx 
Next update: 28 June 2018 
© Crown copyright 
Produced by the Ministry of Justice  
Alternative formats are available on request from xxx@xxx.xx