Clifton Green Primary School
Source: data.gov.uk (2018-10-29)

CYC Internal Audit Reports 2017. These reports are presented to the Audit and Governance Committee for consideration, and are also included with the agenda papers for the [relevant meetings](http://democracy.york.gov.uk/ieListMeetings.aspx?CommitteeId=437). 

Reports are also grouped together by calendar year and published at this York Open Data platform. Reports for other years are available at the [__CYC Internal Audit Reports__](https://data.yorkopendata.org/dataset?q=internal+audit&sort=score+desc%2C+metadata_modified+desc) datasets.

1 
  
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
Clifton Green Primary School  
City of York Council 
Internal Audit Report 2016/17 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Business Unit: Children's Services, Education & Skills,   
Headteacher: D Brown 
Date Issued: 09/03/17 
Status:  Final 
Reference: 15691/007 
 
Overall Audit Opinion 
Reasonable Assurance 
Actions 
09 
0 
P3 
P2 
P1 
0 

 
2 
  
 
Summary and Overall Conclusions 
 
Introduction 
This audit was carried out on Tuesday 29th November and Wednesday 30th November 2016 as part of the Internal Audit plan for Education, 
Skills and Children’s Services for 2016/17. 
Objectives and Scope of the Audit 
The purpose of this audit was to provide advice to the Governors, Head Teacher and the Authority's Section 151 Officer about the financial 
management procedures and assurance that internal controls of the school were operating effectively to manage key risks, both financial and 
otherwise. The audit covered the following areas in accordance with the specification issued on 13th October 2016: 
 
• 
Governance;  
• 
Financial Management;  
• 
System Reconciliation; 
• 
Petty Cash 
• 
Contracts – Ordering, Purchasing and Authorisation;  
• 
Income;  
 
• 
Capital and Property; 
• 
Additional School Activity Provision; 
• 
Human Resources; 
• 
Payroll; 
 
• 
School Meals;  
• 
Pupil Numbers;  
• 
Voluntary Funds Monitoring Arrangements;  
• 
Data Protection and Information Technology;  
• 
Insurance and Risk Management;  
• 
Joint Use Facilities; 
• 
Inventory Records; 
• 
Security; and 
• 
Safeguarding Arrangements. 
Key Findings 
The audit found that procedures in place for financial management and governance at the school were generally good. However the audit 
identified a number of additional controls that should be applied. The register of interests for Governors and general governance arrangements 
should be published on the schools website in accordance with statutory guidance as should the schools publication scheme and associated 

 
3 
  
 
guide to information. Financial information should be checked for accuracy before presentation to the Governors. The significant arrears in 
relation to school meals, after school club and breakfast club should be promptly chased up and progress monitored and reported at an 
appropriate level. The school should ensure lettings income is correctly coded for VAT purposes and that VAT on expenditure is only reclaimed if 
a VAT invoice or receipt is in place. Funding received from the Council should be checked for accuracy against the schools records. 
Overall Conclusions 
It was found that the arrangements for managing risk were satisfactory with a number of weaknesses identified. An acceptable control 
environment is in operation but there are a number of improvements that could be made. Our overall opinion of the controls within the system at 
the time of the audit was that they provided Reasonable Assurance. 
 
 

 
4 
  
 
 
1 Register of Interests 
Issue/Control Weakness 
Risk 
The register of interests for governors has not been published on the school’s 
website. 
The requirements of the Constitution of Governing Bodies 
Statutory Guidance 2015 in relation to transparency are not 
being met. 
Findings 
The register of Interests for Governors and the register of interests for staff with financial responsibility was reviewed and found to be complete.  
 
In the interests of transparency, and in accordance with statutory guidance a governing body is required to publish on its website up-to-date 
details of its governance arrangements. This should include the register of interests for members of the Governing Body over the past 12 
months and other details such as Governors attendance record at committee meetings and the names of the chair of each committee. 
It was noted that not all the required details had been published on the school’s website including the register of interests for Governors. 
Recommendation 
It is advised that governance arrangements published on the schools website are reviewed against the statutory requirements and that the 
school ensures that the register of interests for Governors is included on the website. 
Agreed Action 1.1 
The register of interests for members of the Governing Body over the past 12 months and 
other details such as Governors attendance record at committee meetings and the names 
of the chair of each committee will be published on our website. 
Priority 
3 
Responsible Officer 
Business Manager 
Timescale 
10th February 2017 
 
 

 
5 
  
 
 
2 Financial Management 
Issue/Control Weakness 
Risk 
Budget monitoring reports presented to Governors and the revised budget 
document approved by Governors recorded an inaccurate start budget. It was 
also noted that a benchmarking exercise had not been completed in the last 12 
months. 
Financial decisions may be based on incorrect data and may 
adversely affect the budgetary position at the school. 
Findings 
There were some discrepancies identified between the start budget approved by Governors and the start budget recorded on the finance 
system. The latest monitoring report produced from the finance system for period 7 and presented to Governors at the November Finance 
Committee meeting included these discrepancies. This resulted in some variances being incorrectly stated. The incorrect start budget was 
recorded on the revised budget document approved by Governors at the November meeting and signed by the Chair. 
It was also noted that a benchmarking exercise had not been completed for the school in the last 12 months. This was due to the school having 
a new Bursar in this period. It was planned that a benchmarking exercise would be carried out in the current financial year to support planning 
for the 2016/17 start budget. 
Recommendation 
To ensure accurate budget monitoring information is produced from the finance system, it is recommended that the budget recorded on the 
finance system is checked to the approved budget and any corrections made prior to a monitoring report being produced and presented to the 
Finance Committee. 
Agreed Action 2.1 
When the Resources Committee started to look at the Revised Budget they realised there 
was a discrepancy in the Start budget.  This was due to a formula that was written into the 
Start Budget by CYC.  This discrepancy was recorded in the minutes of the Resources 
Committee Minutes. In the future we will double check that the formulas are correct before 
presenting figures to the Governors. 
Priority 
3 
Responsible Officer 
Bursar 
Timescale 
Complete 
 
 

 
6 
  
 
 
3 VAT 
Issue/Control Weakness 
Risk 
On occasions VAT had been reclaimed when a VAT receipt or VAT invoice had 
not been obtained. A general error in VAT coding of income was also noted. 
Penalties may be levied by H M Revenue & Customs for 
failure to account correctly for VAT. 
Findings 
Testing of purchases made using the Schools purchasing card highlighted that on occasions, the VAT element of on-line purchases had been 
reclaimed without a VAT receipt or VAT invoice being obtained. It was also noted that income from lettings which is “exempt income” for VAT 
purposes had been VAT coded as “outside scope”. 
Recommendation 
A VAT receipt or VAT invoice must be in place before VAT is reclaimed for expenditure at the school. Lettings income should be VAT coded as 
“exempt”. It is advised that the school contact the Council’s VAT officer concerning any VAT adjustments which may be required. 
Agreed Action 3.1 
In future a VAT receipt or VAT invoice will always be in place before VAT is reclaimed.  The 
Bursar will also VAT code lettings as exempt. 
Priority 
3 
Responsible Officer 
Bursar 
Timescale 
17th February 2017 
 
 

 
7 
  
 
 
4 Debtors 
Issue/Control Weakness 
Risk 
The school has substantial debtors for school meals, after school club and 
breakfast club. 
The school may not collect all income due. 
Findings 
An electronic income collection system is in place at the school with a good level of take up. Parents are still given the option to pay charges by 
cash or by cheque. At the time of audit there was a significant level of debt in relation to school meals (£2100), after school club (£850) and 
breakfast club (£520). Several families had individual debts in excess of £100. It had also been reported to Resources Committee that the 
school had significantly subsidised school trips (approximately 4K last year) due to an inadequate level of voluntary contributions being 
received. 
Payment plans had been arranged for families with a high level of debt with regular checks to ensure payments have been made.  Parents 
have also been reminded that without sufficient voluntary contributions a trip will not go ahead. 
Recommendation 
The school should continue to pursue debts for school meals, after school club and breakfast club in accordance with Council Policy. Guidance 
on the pursuit of overdue payments has been sent to the school. It is suggested that the school considers setting a level at which they would 
withdraw services unless special circumstances apply. Where possible the school should require pre payment if services continue to be used.   
 
It is recommended that the current position on arrears and any subsidy of school activities due to lack of voluntary contributions is regularly 
reported to Finance Committee. 
Agreed Action 4.1 
We will continue to pursue debts for school meals, ASC and BC.  We now have a plan in 
place, where possible we ask for pre payment and if the debt is still owing request payment 
by letter.  If the debt hasn’t been settled by a certain date the child will be unable to access 
meals or ASV/BC. 
 
The current positon on arrears has been reported to the Resources Committee and we will 
keep them in the picture. 
Priority 
3 
Responsible Officer 
Bursar 
Timescale 
17th February 2017 
 
 

 
8 
  
 
 
5 Contract Review 
Issue/Control Weakness 
Risk 
Effective procurement planning and review of the schools service contracts and 
other ongoing contractual arrangements is not adequately evidenced. 
Best value may not be obtained. 
Findings 
It was confirmed that current contract documents are held at the school and that contracts for retender and service to schools arrangements are 
discussed at Finance committee. However the school does not hold a consolidated record of service contracts or other ongoing contractual 
arrangements. There is no evidence to confirm that all contractual arrangements are kept under review to ensure they meet current 
requirements and are programmed for re- tender or market testing where appropriate. 
Recommendation 
It is recommended that a schedule of current contractual arrangements, to include contract costs and contract end dates, is maintained and 
that contract review is evidenced through review of this document. It is advised that the schedule is presented to Governors to provide 
assurance of effective procurement planning. 
Agreed Action 5.1 
The School has received the CYC Contract Review Schedule and will use this in the future 
to review contracts every term.  The schedule will be presented to the Resource Committee 
when contracts need to be reviewed. 
Priority 
3 
Responsible Officer 
Business Manager 
Timescale 
17th February 2018 
 
 

 
9 
  
 
 
6 Human Resources 
Issue/Control Weakness 
Risk 
Completion of return to work interviews after a period of sickness was not 
adequately evidenced on the Council’s Self Certification Form. 
Failure to comply with HR policy and procedures. 
Findings 
Self Certification Forms for a sample of staff sickness absences were reviewed. It was noted that completion of a return to work interview was 
either not evidenced on the Self Certification Form or was not properly recorded eg was not signed by both parties. 
Recommendation 
Every period of sickness absence should be followed up by a return to work interview with the line manager/supervisor, usually on the first day 
of the employee’s return to work. This should be completed in accordance with HR Guidelines and recorded on the City of York Council Self 
Certification Form. 
Agreed Action 6.1 
We have amended our procedures so when a member of staff returns to work after an 
absence an appointment is made for a return to work interview with the Headteacher. 
Priority 
3 
Responsible Officer 
Bursar 
Timescale 
3rd February 2018 
 
 

 
10 
  
 
 
 
7 Publication Scheme 
Issue/Control Weakness 
Risk 
The school has adopted the Information Commissioners Model Publication 
Scheme for schools but the associated Guide to Information has not been 
completed. These documents should be published on the schools website. 
The school may not be complying fully with the requirements 
under the Data Protection Act (DPA), Environmental 
Regulations (EIR) and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 
and statutory requirements may be breached. 
Findings 
The school has adopted the current publication scheme but has not completed the associated guide to information. The Information 
Commissioner specifies that the model publication scheme and the guide to information, with electronic links to the information specified in the 
guide where possible, should be available on the website. 
Recommendation 
The school should ensure they have adopted the Information Commissioners Model Publication Scheme with the Guide to Information 
available from the ICO website. The approved scheme and Guide to Information should be published on the schools website and where 
possible the information referred to in the schedule made available via the website. 
Agreed Action 7.1 
The school has completed the Guide to Information and this will be published with the 
Information Commissioners Model Publication Scheme on the school website. 
Priority 
3 
Responsible Officer 
Business Manager 
Timescale 
3rd February 2017 
 
 

 
11 
  
 
 
8 Early Years 
Issue/Control Weakness 
Risk 
Funding received for the nursery is not checked at the school to ensure it is 
correct for all children attending. 
The school may not receive the correct nursery funding. 
Findings 
The accuracy of the termly funding received from the Council is not verified by the school. As part of the audit the record of funded hours for 
individual nursery children for Summer term 2016 was checked to nursery attendance records and to Parent Declaration Forms held at the 
school. All children attending appeared to have been correctly funded and had Parent Declaration Forms in place. However, funding had been 
received for an additional child who did not appear on the attendance register and had no Parent Declaration Form. This discrepancy was 
notified to the Council’s Early Years Team. 
Recommendation 
The school should check the termly funding received from the Council to their own records to ensure funding is accurate. A detailed record of 
the funded children can be obtained from the Council’s Early Years team. 
Agreed Action 8.1 
In future the school will check the termly funding received from the Council against their 
own records to ensure the funding is correct. 
Priority 
3 
Responsible Officer 
Business Manager 
Timescale 
17th February 2017 
 
 

 
12 
  
 
 
9 Inventory 
Issue/Control Weakness 
Risk 
There is no signed record of an annual check of the inventory retained by the 
school. 
Items which have been lost or misappropriated may not be 
identified and investigated. 
Findings 
An inventory record is maintained by the School and assurance was given that this record is checked on an annual basis. The record of checks 
is not retained and signed by the officer completing the checks. 
Recommendation 
The inventory check completed by an officer independent of maintaining the inventory record should be evidenced by retaining a copy of the 
verified inventory signed by the officer completing the check. If this is not a full check (eg a targeted check towards the most vulnerable items, 
higher value items or particular equipment) it should be clear from this record which items have been checked. 
Agreed Action 9.1 
The inventory check will be verified and signed by an officer independent of maintaining the 
inventory.  The record will clearly show which items have been checked. 
Priority 
3 
Responsible Officer 
Business Manager 
Timescale 
17th February 2017 
 
 

 
13 
  
 
Annex 1 
Audit Opinions and Priorities for Actions 
Audit Opinions 
Audit work is based on sampling transactions to test the operation of systems. It cannot guarantee the elimination of fraud or 
error. Our opinion is based on the risks we identify at the time of the audit. 
 
Our overall audit opinion is based on 5 grades of opinion, as set out below. 
 
Opinion 
Assessment of internal control 
High Assurance 
Overall, very good management of risk. An effective control environment appears to be in operation. 
Substantial 
Assurance 
Overall, good management of risk with few weaknesses identified.  An effective control environment is in 
operation but there is scope for further improvement in the areas identified. 
Reasonable 
Assurance 
Overall, satisfactory management of risk with a number of weaknesses identified.  An acceptable control 
environment is in operation but there are a number of improvements that could be made. 
Limited Assurance 
Overall, poor management of risk with significant control weaknesses in key areas and major 
improvements required before an effective control environment will be in operation. 
No Assurance 
Overall, there is a fundamental failure in control and risks are not being effectively managed.  A number of 
key areas require substantial improvement to protect the system from error and abuse. 
 
Priorities for Actions 
Priority 1 
A fundamental system weakness, which presents unacceptable risk to the system objectives and requires urgent 
attention by management. 
Priority 2 
A significant system weakness, whose impact or frequency presents risks to the system objectives, which needs to 
be addressed by management. 
Priority 3 
The system objectives are not exposed to significant risk, but the issue merits attention by management. 
 

 
14 
  
 
 
Where information resulting from audit work is made public or is provided to a third party by the client or by Veritau then this must be done on the understanding that 
any third party will rely on the information at its own risk.  Veritau will not owe a duty of care or assume any responsibility towards anyone other than the client in 
relation to the information supplied. Equally, no third party may assert any rights or bring any claims against Veritau in connection with the information. Where 
information is provided to a named third party, the third party will keep the information confidential.