theatticusproject/maud huggingface dataset:
Section 6.03. Go-Shop; No Solicitation. <omitted> (h)                Further, the Company Board shall not make an Adverse Recommendation Change in response to an Acquisition Proposal (or terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 10.01(d)(i)), unless (i) the Company Board has determined, after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal, (ii) the Company promptly notifies Parent in writing, at least three (3) calendar days before taking such action, of the determination of the Company Board that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal and of its intention to take such action, attaching the most current version of the proposed agreement or material written terms under which such Superior Proposal is proposed to be consummated and the identity of the Third Party making such Superior Proposal and the material terms thereof and (iii) the Company Board (A) shall have negotiated, and shall have directed its Representatives to negotiate, in good faith with Parent during such notice period, to the extent Parent requests to negotiate, to enable Parent to propose in writing a binding offer to effect revisions to the terms of this Agreement such that it would cause such Superior Proposal to no longer constitute a Superior Proposal or, in connection with an Adverse Recommendation Change, it would cause the Company Board or such committee or subcommittee to no longer believe that the failure to make an Adverse Recommendation Change would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under Applicable Law, (B) shall have considered in good faith any revisions to this Agreement irrevocably proposed in writing by Parent and (C) shall have determined that such Acquisition Proposal would continue to constitute a Superior Proposal and in connection with an Adverse Recommendation Change, shall have determined that the failure to make an Adverse Recommendation Change would continue to reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law, in each case, if such revisions were to be given effect (it being understood and agreed that any material amendment to the financial terms or other material terms of such Superior Proposal shall require a new written notification from the Company but only a new two (2) calendar day period under this Section 6.03(h)). Any termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 6.03(e) or this Section 6.03(h) shall be in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 10.01 and, to the extent required under the terms of Section 11.05(a)(i) or (a)(ii), the Company shall pay Parent the applicable Company Termination Fee in accordance with Section 11.05(a)(i) or (a)(ii), as applicable. (Page 30)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 3 calendar days
Section 6.03. Go-Shop; No Solicitation. <omitted> the Company Board shall not make an Adverse Recommendation Change in response to an Acquisition Proposal <omitted> unless <omitted> the Company promptly notifies Parent in writing, <omitted> of the determination of the Company Board that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal and of its intention to take such action, <omitted> (it being understood and agreed that any material amendment to the financial terms or other material terms of such Superior Proposal shall require a new written notification from the Company but only a new two (2) calendar day period under this Section 6.03(h)). (Page 30)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 3 calendar days
Section 5.4 Non-Solicitation.
<omitted>

(b) <omitted> Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time prior to obtaining the East Stockholder Approval, and subject to East’s compliance in all material respects at all times with the provisions of this Section 5.4 and Section 5.3, in response to a Superior Proposal with respect to East that was not initiated, solicited, knowingly encouraged or knowingly facilitated by East or any of the East Subsidiaries or any of their respective Representatives, the East Board may make an East Adverse Recommendation Change; provided, however, that East shall not be entitled to exercise its right to make an East Adverse Recommendation Change in response to a Superior Proposal with respect to East (x) until three (3) Business Days after East provides written notice to Central (an “East Notice”) advising Central that the East Board or a committee thereof has received a Superior Proposal, specifying the material terms and conditions of such Superior Proposal, and identifying the Person or group making such Superior Proposal, (y) if during such three (3) Business Day period, Central proposes any alternative transaction (including any modifications to the terms of this Agreement), unless the East Board determines in good faith (after consultation with East’s financial advisors and outside legal counsel, and taking into account all financial, legal, and regulatory terms and conditions of such alternative transaction proposal, including any conditions to and expected timing of consummation, and any risks of non-consummation of such alternative transaction proposal) that such alternative transaction proposal is not at least as favorable to East and its stockholders as the Superior Proposal (it being understood that any change in the financial or other material terms of a Superior Proposal shall require a new East Notice and a new two (2) Business Day period under this Section 5.4(b)) and (z) unless the East Board, after consultation with outside legal counsel, determines that the failure to make an East Adverse Recommendation Change would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties. (Page 76)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 3 business days
Section 5.4 Non-Solicitation.
<omitted>

(b) <omitted> in response to a Superior Proposal with respect to East that was not initiated, solicited, knowingly encouraged or knowingly facilitated by East or any of the East Subsidiaries or any of their respective Representatives, the East Board may make an East Adverse Recommendation Change; provided, however, that East shall not be entitled to exercise its right to make an East Adverse Recommendation Change in response to a Superior Proposal with respect to East (x) until three (3) Business Days after East provides written notice to Central <omitted> (it being understood that any change in the financial or other material terms of a Superior Proposal shall require a new East Notice and a new two (2) Business Day period under this Section 5.4(b)) (Page 76)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 3 business days
Section 5.3            Solicitation. 
<omitted> 
(e)   
<omitted> 
(C) the Company has given Parent at least four (4) Business Days prior written notice of its intention to take such action specifying, in reasonable detail, the reasons therefor, and (D) during such notice period, the Company Board has considered and, at the reasonable request of Parent, caused the Company to engage in good faith discussions regarding any revisions to the terms of this Agreement proposed in writing by Parent, and (E) at the end of such notice period, the Company Board has again determined, after consultation with independent financial advisors and outside legal counsel and taking into account any revisions to the terms of this Agreement proposed by Parent, that the failure to make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary or statutory duties under applicable Law. (Page 22)

Section 5.3            Solicitation. 
<omitted> 
(f) 
<omitted> 
(iv) the Company has given Parent at least four (4) Business Days prior written notice of its intention to take such action, including the material terms and conditions of, and the identity of the Person making, any such Company Takeover Proposal that is the basis of the proposed action and the Company has contemporaneously provided to Parent a copy of the Company Takeover Proposal and a copy of any proposed Company Acquisition Agreements (it being understood that any amendment to any material term of such Company Takeover Proposal and shall require a new written notice and new notice period, except that the four (4) Business Day period referred to in this clause shall instead be equal to the longer of (x) two (2) Business Days or (y) the period remaining under the original four (4) Business Day notice period immediately prior to the delivery of the new written notice), (v) during such notice period, the Company Board has considered and, at the reasonable request of Parent, caused the Company to engage in good faith discussions regarding any revisions to the terms of this Agreement proposed in writing by Parent, and (vi) at the end of such notice period, the Company Board again has determined, after consultation with independent financial advisors and outside legal counsel and taking into account any revisions to the terms of this Agreement proposed by Parent, that the Company Superior Proposal would nevertheless continue to constitute a Company Superior Proposal if the revisions proposed by Parent were to be given effect, and that the failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary or statutory duties under applicable Law. (Page 22)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 2 business days or less
Section 5.4 Non-Solicitation. <omitted> Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time prior to obtaining the Lambda Stockholder Approval, and subject to Lambda’s compliance in all material respects at all times with the provisions of this Section 5.4 and Section 5.3, in response to a Superior Proposal with respect to Lambda that was not initiated, solicited, knowingly encouraged or knowingly facilitated by Lambda or any of the Lambda Subsidiaries or any of their respective Representatives, the Lambda Board may make a Lambda Adverse Recommendation Change; provided, however, that Lambda shall not be entitled to exercise its right to make a Lambda Adverse Recommendation Change in response to a Superior Proposal with respect to Lambda (x) until three (3) Business Days after Lambda provides written notice to Pi (a “Lambda Notice”) advising Pi that the Lambda Board or a committee thereof has received a Superior Proposal, specifying the material terms and conditions of such Superior Proposal, and identifying the Person or group making such Superior Proposal, (y) if during such three (3) Business Day period, Pi proposes any alternative transaction (including any modifications to the terms of this Agreement), unless the Lambda Board determines in good faith (after consultation with Lambda’s financial advisors and outside legal counsel, and taking into account all financial, legal, and regulatory terms and conditions of such alternative transaction proposal, including any conditions to and expected timing of consummation, and any risks of non-consummation of such alternative transaction proposal) that such alternative   67


transaction proposal is not at least as favorable to Lambda and its stockholders as the Superior Proposal (it being understood that any change in the financial or other material terms of a Superior Proposal shall require a new Lambda Notice and a new two (2) Business Day period under this Section 5.4(b)) and (z) unless the Lambda Board, after consultation with outside legal counsel, determines that the failure to make a Lambda Adverse Recommendation Change would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties. (Pages 72-73)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 2 business days or less
The Company shall not be entitled to effect a Recommendation Withdrawal with respect to a Superior Proposal or an Intervening Event or to terminate this Agreement under Section 7.1(d)(ii) unless <omitted> (i) the Company has provided a written notice to Parent at least four (4) Business Days in advance (the “Notice Period”) <omitted> In the event of any material revisions to such Superior Proposal or material changes related to such Intervening Event, the Company shall be required to deliver a new written notice to Parent and Merger Sub and to comply with the requirements of this Section 5.2(f) with respect to such new written notice, except that the four (4) Business Day period referred to in this Section 5.2(f) shall be reduced to two (2) Business Days. (Page 44)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 2 business days or less
Section 5.04 No Solicitation. <omitted> (e) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, in response to an Intervening Event that has occurred after the date of this Agreement but prior to the receipt of the Company Shareholder Approval, the Company Board may effect a Company Adverse Recommendation Change if: (i) prior to effecting the Company Adverse Recommendation Change, the Company promptly notifies Parent, in writing, at least five (5) Business Days (the “Intervening Event Notice Period”) before taking such action of its intent to consider such action (which notice shall not, by itself, constitute a Company Adverse Recommendation Change), and which notice shall include a reasonably detailed   40


description of the underlying facts giving rise to the Intervening Event, and the reasons for taking, such action; (ii) the Company shall, and shall cause its Representatives to, during the Intervening Event Notice Period, negotiate with Parent in good faith to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that the Company Board would no longer determine underlying facts giving rise to, and the reasons for taking such action, ceases to constitute an Intervening Event, if Parent, in its discretion, proposes to make such adjustments (it being agreed that in the event that, after commencement of the Intervening Event Notice Period, there is any material development in an Intervening Event, the Intervening Event Notice Period shall be extended, if applicable, to ensure that at least three (3) Business Days remains in the Intervening Event Notice Period subsequent to the time the Company notifies Parent of any such material development (it being understood that there may be multiple extensions)); (iii) the Company has complied in all material respects with its obligations pursuant to this Section 5.04(e) with respect to such Intervening Event and (iv) the Company Board determines in good faith, after consulting with outside legal counsel and its Company Financial Advisor, that the failure to effect such Company Adverse Recommendation Change, after taking into account any adjustments made by Parent during the Intervening Event Notice Period, would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under applicable Law. The Company acknowledges and hereby agrees that any Company Adverse Recommendation Change effected (or proposed to be effected) in response to or in connection with any Takeover Proposal may be made solely and exclusively pursuant to Section 5.04(d) only, and may not be made pursuant to this Section 5.04(e), and any Company Adverse Recommendation Change may only be made pursuant to thisSection 5.04 and no other provisions of this Agreement. (Pages 44-45)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 3 business days
7.02 Shareholder Approval. <omitted> provided that: (a) prior to making an Adverse Recommendation Change, the CBTC Board shall provide written notice to United (a “Notice of Recommendation Change”) of its intent to announce an Adverse Recommendation Change on the fifth (5th) business day following delivery of such notice, which notice shall specify any material terms and conditions of any applicable Superior Proposal (and include a copy thereof with all accompanying documentation, if in writing), and identify the Person making such Superior Proposal, if applicable (it being understood that any amendment to any material term of such Superior Proposal shall require a new Notice of Recommendation Change, except that, in such case, the five (5) business day period referred to in this Section 7.02 shall be reduced to three (3) business days following the delivery of such new Notice of Recommendation Change); (b) after providing such Notice of Recommendation Change, CBTC shall negotiate in good faith with United (if requested by United) and provide United reasonable opportunity during the subsequent five (5) business day period to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement as would enable the CBTC Board to proceed without an Adverse Recommendation Change (it being understood that United shall not be required to propose any such adjustments); and (c) the CBTC Board, following such five (5) business day period, determines in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside counsel, that the failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to constitute a breach of the fiduciary duties of the members of the CBTC Board under applicable law. (Page 46)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 3 business days
Section 5.04    Stockholder Approval. <omitted> However, subject to Section 7.01 and Section 7.02, if the board of directors of Company, in response to (1) a Company Intervening Event or (2) a Company Superior Proposal, in each case, after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisor, determines in good faith that it would be reasonably likely to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable Law to continue to recommend this Agreement and the Merger, then, prior to the receipt of the Requisite Company Stockholder Approval, in submitting this Agreement and the Merger to its stockholders, the board of directors of Company may withhold or withdraw or modify or qualify in a manner adverse to Buyer the Company Board Recommendation or may submit this Agreement and the Merger to its shareholders without recommendation (each, a “Company Adverse Recommendation Change”) (although the resolutions approving this Agreement as of 

    57


the date hereof may not be rescinded or amended), in which event the board of directors of Company may communicate the basis for its Company Adverse Recommendation Change to its stockholders, including in the Joint Proxy Statement-Prospectus or an appropriate amendment or supplement thereto; provided, that the board of directors of Company may not take any actions under this sentence (including effecting a Company Adverse Recommendation Change) unless (i) it gives Buyer at least four (4) Business Days’ prior written notice of its intention to take such action and a reasonable description of the event or circumstances giving rise to its determination to take such action (including, in the event such action is taken by the board of directors of Company in response to a Company Superior Proposal, the latest material terms and conditions and the identity of the third party in any such Company Superior Proposal, or any amendment or modification thereof, or describe in reasonable detail such other event or circumstances) and (ii) at the end of such notice period, the board of directors of Company takes into account any amendment or modification to this Agreement proposed by Buyer and after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisor, determines in good faith that it would nevertheless be reasonably likely to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable Law to continue to recommend this Agreement and the Merger. Any material amendment to any Company Superior Proposal will be deemed to be a new Company Superior Proposal for purposes of this Section 5.04(a) and will require a new notice period as referred to in this Section 5.04(a). Company agrees to use commercially reasonable efforts to convene the Company Meeting as soon as practicable after the Registration Statement becomes effective. (Pages 62-63)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 4 business days
Section 5.14 No Solicitation; Change of Recommendation. <omitted>  (h) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, at any time prior to the Requisite KTYB Vote, the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) may make a Change of Recommendation (and terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(f) if: <omitted> 

(C) (1) KTYB shall have provided prior written notice to SYBT at least six (6) business days in advance (the “Notice Period”), to the effect that the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) has concluded in good faith that a Superior Proposal has been received and, absent any revision to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) has resolved to effect a Change in Recommendation pursuant to this Section 5.14(h) (and terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(f)), which notice shall specify the basis for such Change in Recommendation, including the identity of the person or group of persons making the Superior Proposal, the material terms thereof and copies of all relevant documents relating to such Superior Proposal; 

(2) prior to effecting such Change in Recommendation (or termination pursuant to Section 7.1(f)), (aa) KTYB shall, and shall cause its financial and legal advisors to, during the Notice Period, negotiate with SYBT and its Representatives in good faith (to the extent SYBT desires to negotiate) to make adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and permit SYBT and its Representatives to make a presentation to the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) regarding this Agreement and any adjustments with respect thereto (to the extent SYBT desires to make such presentation), and (bb) at the end of the Notice Period the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) again makes the determination in good faith (i) after consultation with outside legal counsel that the failure to make a Change in Recommendation (or authorize the termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(f)) would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law and (ii) taking into account any adjustment to the terms and conditions of this Agreement proposed by SYBT, that the Acquisition Proposal continues to be a Superior


Proposal; provided that, in the event of any material revisions to the Acquisition Proposal that the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) has determined to be a Superior Proposal, KTYB shall be required to deliver a new written notice to SYBT and to comply with the requirements of this Section 5.14 (including this Section 5.14(h)) with respect to such new written notice and the revised Superior Proposal contemplated thereby; and (Pages 46-47)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: > 5 business days