theatticusproject/maud huggingface dataset:
7.2.         Acquisition Proposals. 
<omitted> 
(d)             Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, at any time prior to the Bryn Mawr Meeting, the board of directors of Bryn Mawr may make a Change in the Bryn Mawr Recommendation (including, for the avoidance of doubt, approving, endorsing or recommending any Acquisition Proposal), if (i) Bryn Mawr has received a Superior Proposal (after giving effect to the terms of any revised offer by WSFS pursuant to this Section 7.2(d)), and (ii) the board of directors of Bryn Mawr has determined in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would be a violation of the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law; provided, that the board of directors of Bryn Mawr may not take the actions set forth in this Section 7.2(d) unless:  (Page 52)


7.2.         Acquisition Proposals. 
<omitted> 
(e)             Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, at any time prior to the WSFS Meeting, the board of directors of WSFS may make a Change in the WSFS Recommendation, if the board of directors of WSFS has determined in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would be a violation of the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law; provided, that the board of directors of WSFS may not take the actions set forth in this Section 7.2(e) unless:  (Page 53)

Question: Fiduciary exception to COR covenant
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
6.3 Stockholders' Approvals.
 <omitted>
 
 (b) <omitted> each of the Boards of Directors of BancShares and CIT may submit this Agreement to its stockholders without recommendation (which, for the avoidance of doubt, shall constitute a Recommendation Change), in which event such Board of Directors may communicate the basis for its lack of recommendation to its stockholders in the Joint Proxy Statement or an appropriate amendment or supplement thereto to the extent required by law (although the resolutions approving this Agreement as of the date hereof may not be rescinded or amended), if (i)(A) such Board of Directors has received an Acquisition Proposal, which it believes in good faith, after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors, constitutes a Superior Proposal <omitted> or (B) an Intervening Event has occurred, and (ii) such Board of Directors, after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors, determines in good faith that failure to take such actions would more likely than not result in a violation of its fiduciary duty under applicable law (Page 58)

Question: Fiduciary exception to COR covenant
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: Other specified standard
Section 6.02.      Acquisition Proposals; Change of Recommendation.  <omitted> 
(d)           No Change of Recommendation or Alternative Acquisition Agreement. 
<omitted> 
(iii)                Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, prior to the Offer Acceptance Time, the Company Board may:   (x) effect a Change of Recommendation if: (A)  a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a violation of this Section 6.02 is received by the Company and has not been withdrawn, and  the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that a failure to effect a Change of Recommendation would be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law and, after consultation with its financial advisor, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal; or (B) the Company Board determines in good faith that an Intervening Event has occurred and, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that a failure to effect a Change of Recommendation would be inconsistent with


the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law, and/or (Pages 32-33)

Question: Fiduciary exception to COR covenant
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Section 6.02.      Acquisition Proposals; Change of Recommendation. <omitted> 
(d)           No Change of Recommendation or Alternative Acquisition Agreement. 
<omitted> 
(iii)               <omitted> the Company Board may:   (x) effect a Change of Recommendation if: (A)  a <omitted> Acquisition Proposal <omitted> is received by the Company <omitted> , and  the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that a failure to effect a Change of Recommendation would be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law and, after consultation with its financial advisor, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal; or (B) the Company Board determines in good faith that an Intervening Event has occurred and, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that a failure to effect a Change of Recommendation would be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law, and/or (Pages 32-33)

Question: Fiduciary exception to COR covenant
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
SECTION 5.02. No Solicitation.  <omitted> (b) <omitted> Notwithstanding the foregoing, and only at a time prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company may (x) make an Adverse Recommendation Change <omitted> in response to an Intervening Event, (y) make an Adverse Recommendation Change <omitted> in response to a Superior Proposal <omitted> , but in each case only if: <omitted> in light of such Superior Proposal <omitted> the Company Board shall have determined in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and consultation with a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation, that failure to make an Adverse Recommendation Change <omitted> or to make an Adverse Recommendation Change <omitted> would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties (Page 53)

Question: Fiduciary exception to COR covenant
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: "Reasonably likely/expected to be inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Section 5.6 Solicitation; Acquisition Proposals; Adverse Recommendation Change. <omitted> (f)            The Company Board shall only be entitled to effect an Adverse Recommendation Change and/or terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(c)(i) as permitted under Section 5.6(e) if (i) the Company has provided a prior written notice (a “Notice of Change of Recommendation”) to Parent that the Company intends to take such action, identifying the Person making the Superior Proposal and describing the material terms and conditions of the Superior Proposal or Intervening Event, as applicable, that is the basis of such action, including, if applicable, copies of any written proposals or offers and any proposed written agreements related to a Superior Proposal (it being agreed that the delivery of the Notice of Change of Recommendation by the Company shall not constitute an Adverse Recommendation Change), (ii) during the three (3) Business Day period following Parent’s receipt of the Notice of Change of Recommendation and ending at 11:59 p.m. (New York City time) on such 3rd Business Day (a “Notice of Change Period”), the Company shall, and shall cause its Representatives to, negotiate with Parent in good faith (to the extent Parent desires to negotiate) to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement, so that, in the case of a Superior Proposal, such Superior Proposal ceases to constitute a Superior Proposal, or, in the case of an Intervening Event, in order to obviate the need to make such Adverse Recommendation Change; and (iii) following the end of the Notice of Change Period, the Company Board shall have determined in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and financial advisors, taking into account any changes to this Agreement proposed in writing by Parent in response to the Notice of Change of Recommendation or otherwise, that (A) the Superior Proposal giving rise to the Notice of Change of Recommendation continues to constitute a Superior Proposal or (B) in the case of an Intervening Event, the failure of the Company Board to effect an Adverse Recommendation Change would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law. Any amendment to the financial terms or any other material amendment of such a Superior Proposal shall require a new Notice of Change of Recommendation, and the Company shall be required to comply again with the requirements of this Section 5.6(f); provided, however, that the Notice of Change Period shall be reduced to two (2) Business Days following receipt by Parent of any such new Notice of Change of Recommendation and ending at 11:59 p.m. (New York City time) on such 2nd Business Day. (Page 32)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 3 business days
Section 5.3            Solicitation. 
<omitted> 
(e)   
<omitted> 
(C) the Company has given Parent at least four (4) Business Days prior written notice of its intention to take such action specifying, in reasonable detail, the reasons therefor, and (D) during such notice period, the Company Board has considered and, at the reasonable request of Parent, caused the Company to engage in good faith discussions regarding any revisions to the terms of this Agreement proposed in writing by Parent, and (E) at the end of such notice period, the Company Board has again determined, after consultation with independent financial advisors and outside legal counsel and taking into account any revisions to the terms of this Agreement proposed by Parent, that the failure to make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary or statutory duties under applicable Law. (Page 22)

Section 5.3            Solicitation. 
<omitted> 
(f) 
<omitted> 
(iv) the Company has given Parent at least four (4) Business Days prior written notice of its intention to take such action, including the material terms and conditions of, and the identity of the Person making, any such Company Takeover Proposal that is the basis of the proposed action and the Company has contemporaneously provided to Parent a copy of the Company Takeover Proposal and a copy of any proposed Company Acquisition Agreements (it being understood that any amendment to any material term of such Company Takeover Proposal and shall require a new written notice and new notice period, except that the four (4) Business Day period referred to in this clause shall instead be equal to the longer of (x) two (2) Business Days or (y) the period remaining under the original four (4) Business Day notice period immediately prior to the delivery of the new written notice), (v) during such notice period, the Company Board has considered and, at the reasonable request of Parent, caused the Company to engage in good faith discussions regarding any revisions to the terms of this Agreement proposed in writing by Parent, and (vi) at the end of such notice period, the Company Board again has determined, after consultation with independent financial advisors and outside legal counsel and taking into account any revisions to the terms of this Agreement proposed by Parent, that the Company Superior Proposal would nevertheless continue to constitute a Company Superior Proposal if the revisions proposed by Parent were to be given effect, and that the failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary or statutory duties under applicable Law. (Page 22)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 4 business days
Section 5.3           Company Acquisition Proposals. 
<omitted> 
(f)                The Company Board shall not take any action set forth in Section 5.3(e) unless the Company has (i) provided written notice to Parent (a “Notice of Company Superior Proposal” ) informing Parent that the Company has determined that a Company Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Company Superior Proposal, identifying the Person making such Company Superior Proposal and providing a copy of the definitive agreement intended to effect such Company Superior Proposal and the other Company Acquisition Proposal Information, (ii) for the four (4) Business Day period following Parent’s receipt of the Notice of Company Superior Proposal (the “Company Superior Proposal Notice Period”), the Company Board shall have negotiated in good faith with Parent and considered in good faith any counteroffers or proposals, including to amend the terms and conditions of this Agreement (to the extent Parent wishes to do so), and (iii) after complying with clauses (i) and (ii), determined in good faith (after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel and financial advisors and taking into account any such counteroffer or proposed amendment to the terms and conditions of this Agreement) that such Company Acquisition Proposal remains a Company Superior Proposal. In the event of any material revisions to such Company Superior Proposal offered by the Person making such Company Superior Proposal (including any change in purchase price), the Company shall be required to deliver a new written notice to Parent and to again comply with the requirements of this Section 5.3(f) with respect to such new written notice, except that the Company Superior Proposal Notice Period shall be two (2) Business Days with respect to any such new written notice. (Page 32)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 4 business days
6.9 No Solicitation; Change in Company Board Recommendation. <omitted> (ii) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, at any time prior to, but not after, obtaining theCompany Shareholder Approval, the Company Board may make a Company Adverse Change of Recommendation or terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(d) if the Company receives a Company Acquisition Proposal that is not withdrawn and the Company Board concludes in good faith that such Company Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Company Superior Proposal; provided that: <omitted> (B) the Company provides Parent prior written notice at least five (5) Business Days prior to taking such action, which notice shall state that the Company Board has received a Company Superior Proposal and, absent any revision to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Company Board has resolved to effect a Company Adverse Change of Recommendation or to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(d), as applicable, which notice shall specify the basis for such Company Adverse Change of Recommendation or termination, including the material terms of the Company Superior Proposal (a “Notice of Superior Proposal”) (it being understood that such Notice of Superior Proposal shall not be deemed a Company Adverse Change of Recommendation); (C) during such five (5)-Business Day period, the Company negotiates in good faith with Parent (to the extent that Parent wishes to negotiate) to enable Parent to make an improved offer that is at least as favorable to the shareholders of the Company so that such Company Acquisition Proposal would cease to constitute a Company Superior Proposal; and (D) at the end of such five (5)-Business Day period (or such earlier time that Parent advises the Company that it no longer wishes to negotiate to amend this Agreement), the Company Board, after taking into account any modifications to the terms of this Agreement and the Merger agreed to by Parent after receipt of such notice, continues to believe that such Company Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Company Superior Proposal. (Page 67)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 5 business days
Section 5.14 No Solicitation; Change of Recommendation. <omitted>  (h) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, at any time prior to the Requisite KTYB Vote, the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) may make a Change of Recommendation (and terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(f) if: <omitted> 

(C) (1) KTYB shall have provided prior written notice to SYBT at least six (6) business days in advance (the “Notice Period”), to the effect that the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) has concluded in good faith that a Superior Proposal has been received and, absent any revision to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) has resolved to effect a Change in Recommendation pursuant to this Section 5.14(h) (and terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(f)), which notice shall specify the basis for such Change in Recommendation, including the identity of the person or group of persons making the Superior Proposal, the material terms thereof and copies of all relevant documents relating to such Superior Proposal; 

(2) prior to effecting such Change in Recommendation (or termination pursuant to Section 7.1(f)), (aa) KTYB shall, and shall cause its financial and legal advisors to, during the Notice Period, negotiate with SYBT and its Representatives in good faith (to the extent SYBT desires to negotiate) to make adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and permit SYBT and its Representatives to make a presentation to the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) regarding this Agreement and any adjustments with respect thereto (to the extent SYBT desires to make such presentation), and (bb) at the end of the Notice Period the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) again makes the determination in good faith (i) after consultation with outside legal counsel that the failure to make a Change in Recommendation (or authorize the termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(f)) would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law and (ii) taking into account any adjustment to the terms and conditions of this Agreement proposed by SYBT, that the Acquisition Proposal continues to be a Superior


Proposal; provided that, in the event of any material revisions to the Acquisition Proposal that the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) has determined to be a Superior Proposal, KTYB shall be required to deliver a new written notice to SYBT and to comply with the requirements of this Section 5.14 (including this Section 5.14(h)) with respect to such new written notice and the revised Superior Proposal contemplated thereby; and (Pages 46-47)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: Greater than 5 business days
Section 6.02          No Solicitation by the Company.  <omitted> (d)          Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, prior to the Company Approval Time, in response to a Company Acquisition Proposal that the Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith constitutes a Company Superior Proposal, the Board of Directors of the Company may, subject to compliance with this Section 6.02(d), (i) make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change and/or (ii) terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 10.01(d)(iii); provided, that (A) the Company shall first notify Parent in writing at least four Business Days before taking such action that the Company intends to take such action, which notice shall include an unredacted copy of such proposal and a copy of any financing commitments (in the form provided to the Company) relating thereto (and, to the extent not in writing, the material terms and conditions thereof and the identity of the person making any such proposal), (B) the Company shall make its Representatives reasonably available to negotiate with Parent and its Representatives during such four Business Day notice period, to the extent Parent wishes to negotiate, to enable Parent to propose revisions to the terms of this Agreement such that it would cause such Company Superior Proposal to no longer constitute a Company Superior Proposal, (C) upon the end of such notice period, the Board of Directors of the Company shall have considered in good faith any revisions to the terms of this Agreement committed to in writing by Parent, and shall have determined that the Company Superior Proposal would nevertheless continue to constitute a Company Superior Proposal if the revisions committed to in writing by Parent were to be given effect and (D) in the event of any change, from time to time, to any of the financial terms or any other material terms of such Company Superior Proposal, the Company shall, in each case, have delivered to Parent an additional notice consistent with that described in clause (A) of this proviso and a new notice period under clause (A) of this proviso shall commence each time, except each such notice period shall be three Business Days (instead of four Business Days), during which time the Company shall be required to comply with the requirements of this Section 6.02(d) anew with respect to each such additional notice, including clauses (A) through (D) above of this proviso. (Page 76)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 4 business days
Section 6.02          No Solicitation by the Company.  <omitted> (d)          <omitted> the Board of Directors of the Company may <omitted> (i) make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change <omitted> provided, that (A) the Company shall first notify Parent in writing at least four Business Days before taking such action that the Company intends to take such action, <omitted> (D) in the event of any change, from time to time, to any of the financial terms or any other material terms of such Company Superior Proposal, the Company shall, in each case, have delivered to Parent an additional notice consistent with that described in clause (A) of this proviso and a new notice period under clause (A) of this proviso shall commence each time, except each such notice period shall be three Business Days (instead of four Business Days), during which time the Company shall be required to comply with the requirements of this Section 6.02(d) anew with respect to each such additional notice, including clauses (A) through (D) above of this proviso. (Page 76)

Question: Agreement provides for matching rights in connection with COR
Category: Deal Protection and Related Provisions
Answer: 4 business days