the-french-artist/wikipedia_20220301.simple_sentence_embeddings huggingface dataset:
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Atkins v. Virginia,  A death sentence may not be imposed on mentally retarded offenders, but the states can define what it means to be mentally retarded.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Baze v. Rees,  The three-drug cocktail used for performing executions by lethal injection in Kentucky (as well as virtually all of the states using lethal injection at the time) is constitutional under the Eighth Amendment.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Kennedy v. Louisiana,  The death penalty is unconstitutional in all cases that do not involve murder or crimes against the state such as treason.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Apprendi v. New Jersey,  Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Graham v. Florida,  A sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole may not be imposed on juvenile non-homicide offenders.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Miller v. Alabama,  A sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole may not be a mandatory sentence for juvenile offenders.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Ware v. Hylton,  A section of the Treaty of Paris supersedes an otherwise valid Virginia statute under the Supremacy Clause in Article Six, Clause 2 of the Constitution.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Marbury v. Madison,  Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 is unconstitutional because it attempts to expand the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court beyond that permitted by the Constitution.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Fletcher v. Peck,  A state legislature can repeal a corruptly made law, but the Contract Clause of the Constitution prohibits the voiding of valid contracts made under such a law.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 The Commerce Clause of the Constitution does not give Congress the power to prohibit the mere possession of a gun near a school, because gun possession by itself is not an economic activity that affects interstate commerce even indirectly.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton,  The states cannot create qualifications for prospective members of Congress that are stricter than those specified in the Constitution.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 This decision invalidates provisions that had imposed term limits on members of Congress in 23 states.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Printz v. United States,  The interim provision of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act that requires state and local officials to conduct background checks on firearm purchasers violates the Tenth Amendment.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Clinton v. City of New York,  The Line Item Veto Act of 1996 is unconstitutional because it allows the President to amend or repeal parts of statutes without the pre-approval of Congress.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 According to the Presentment Clause of the Constitution, Congress must initiate all changes to existing laws.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 United States v. Morrison,  The section of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 that gives victims of gender-motivated violence the right to sue their attackers in federal court is an unconstitutional intrusion on states' rights, and it cannot be saved by the Commerce Clause or Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius,  The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's expansion of Medicaid is unconstitutional as-written—it is unduly coercive to force the states to choose between participating in the expansion or forgoing all Medicaid funds.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 In addition, the individual health insurance mandate is constitutional by virtue of the Taxing and Spending Clause in Article One, Section 8, Clause 1 (though not by the Commerce Clause or the Necessary and Proper Clause).
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.,  Income taxes on interest, dividends, and rents are, in effect, direct taxes that must be apportioned among the states according to their populations.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 This decision was voided by the Sixteenth Amendment in 1913, allowing income taxes to be implemented without apportionment.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Oregon v. Mitchell,  Congress has the power to regulate requirements for voting in federal elections, but it is prohibited from regulating requirements for voting in state and local elections.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 This decision led to the ratification of the Twenty-sixth Amendment in 1971, which lowered the minimum voting age to 18 for all elections.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Heath v. Alabama,  The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment does not prohibit two different states from separately prosecuting and convicting the same individual for the same illegal act.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 This decision was voided by the Eleventh Amendment in 1795, just two years after it was handed down.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 McCulloch v. Maryland,  The Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution (Article One, Section 8, Clause 18) grants to Congress implied powers for implementing the Constitution's express powers, and state actions may not impede valid exercises of power by the federal government.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 This decision has essentially been rendered moot by the Supreme Court's adoption of the incorporation doctrine, which uses the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to apply portions of the Bill of Rights to the states.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Cooley v. Board of Wardens,  When local circumstances make it necessary, the states can regulate interstate commerce, as long as such regulations do not conflict with federal law.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Ableman v. Booth,  State courts cannot issue rulings that contradict the decisions of federal courts.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Texas v. White,  The states that formed the Confederate States of America during the Civil War never actually left the Union because a state cannot unilaterally secede from the United States.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Cooper v. Aaron,  The states are bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court and cannot choose to ignore them.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Arizona v. United States,  An Arizona law that authorizes local law enforcement to enforce immigration laws is preempted by federal law.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Arizona law enforcement may inquire about a resident's legal status during lawful encounters, but the state may not implement its own immigration laws.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Martin v. Hunter's Lessee,  Federal courts may review state court decisions when they rest on federal law or the federal Constitution.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Ex parte Young,  Sovereign immunity cannot be used to bar suits against state officials for injunctive relief under the Constitution when said officials were not acting on behalf of the state when they sought to enforce an unconstitutional law.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Hylton v. United States,  A tax on the possession of goods is not a direct tax that the federal government must split up among the states according to their populations.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Gibbons v. Ogden,  The power to regulate interstate navigation is granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Swift and Company v. United States,  Congress can prohibit local business practices in order to regulate interstate commerce because those practices, when combined together, form a "stream of commerce" between the states. (
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Missouri v. Holland,  Treaties made by the federal government are supreme over any concerns brought by the states about such treaties interfering with any states' rights derived from the Tenth Amendment.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 J. W. Hampton, Jr. & Co. v. United States,  The Separation of Powers can be side-stepped if Congress provides an "intelligible principle" to guide the executive branch.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation,  The National Labor Relations Act and, by extension, the National Labor Relations Board are constitutional because the Commerce Clause applies to labor relations.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Therefore, the NLRB has the right to sanction companies that fire or discriminate against workers for belonging to a union.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Also, a local commercial activity that is considered in isolation may still constitute interstate commerce if that activity has a "close and substantial relationship" to interstate commerce.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Steward Machine Company v. Davis,  The federal government is permitted to impose a tax even if the goal of the tax is not just the collection of revenue.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is constitutional under the Commerce Clause because it prevents the states from lowering labor standards to gain commercial advantages.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Wickard v. Filburn,  The Commerce Clause of the Constitution allows Congress to regulate anything that has a substantial economic effect on commerce, even if that effect is indirect.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 South Dakota v. Dole,  Congress may attach reasonable conditions to funds disbursed to the states without violating the Tenth Amendment.
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 
 Gonzales v. Raich,  Congress may ban the use of marijuana even in states that have approved its use for medicinal purposes.
Medea 
 She was the daughter of King Aeëtes of Colchis, niece of Circe, granddaughter of the sun god Helios.
Medea 
 In Euripides's play Medea, Jason leaves Medea when Creon, king of Corinth, offers him his daughter, Glauce.
Medea 
 The myths involving Jason have been interpreted as part of a class of myths that tell how the Hellenes of the distant heroic age, before the Trojan War, faced the challenges of the pre-Greek "Pelasgian" cultures of mainland Greece, the Aegean and Anatolia.
Medea 
 Jason, Perseus, Theseus, and above all Heracles, are all figures on the threshold between the old world of shamans, earth deities, and the new Bronze Age Greek ways.
Medea 
 Medea figures in the myth of Jason and the Argonauts, a myth known best from a late literary version worked up by Apollonius of Rhodes in the 3rd century BC and called the Argonautica.
Medea 
 However, for all its self-consciousness and researched archaic vocabulary, the late epic was based on very old, scattered materials.
Medea 
 Medea is known in most stories as an enchantress and is often depicted as a priestess of the goddess Hecate or a witch.
Medea 
 The myth of Jason and Medea is very old, originally written around the time Hesiod wrote the Theogony.
Equal Protection Clause 
 The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction "the equal protection of the laws".
Equal Protection Clause 
 A primary motivation for this clause was to validate the equality provisions contained in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed that all people would have rights equal to those of all citizens.
Equal Protection Clause 
 It applied substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War.
Equal Protection Clause 
 This Supreme Court decision that helped to dismantle racial segregation, and also the basis for many other decisions rejecting discrimination against people belonging to various groups.
Equal Protection Clause 
 However, the Supreme Court held in Bolling v. Sharpe (1954) that equal protection requirements apply to state and local governments through the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing 
 Each level starts with an opponent that either doesn't move, or in a patched version will move but will never complete the race.
Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing 
 When the race is finished, the grammatically incorrect message "You're Winner" is displayed, and the race ends.
Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing 
 It is possible to drive through buildings, up mountains, and even outside the level due to the lack of collision detection.
State supreme court 
 In the United States, a state supreme court (known by other names in some states) is the highest judicial tribunal in the court system of a particular state.
State supreme court 
 Generally, the state supreme court, like most appellate courts, is exclusively for hearing appeals from lower courts.
State supreme court 
 In the case where the trial court made an egregious error in its finding of facts, the state supreme court will send the case back to the trial court for a new trial.
State supreme court 
 This responsibility of correcting the errors of inferior courts is the origin of a number of the different names for supreme courts in various state court systems.
State supreme court 
 Special interest groups have contributed to many of these campaigns raising questions of impartiality.
State supreme court 
 The US Supreme Court, in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. (2009) in a 5-4 decision, ruled that an elected state supreme court judge sitting on a case involving a campaign contributor was a violation of due process.
Investment bank 
 The phrase Investment Bank refers to a business that helps other businesses (and also governments) borrow money from other people and businesses and/or allow businesses to partially or fully sell themselves to other people and businesses.
Investment bank 
 Unlike a regular bank, they do not typically lend their own money or use their own money to purchase part or all of a business, but instead they help to match the business financing need to those other business and personal investors who are seeking to earn money by either lending to the business or owning part of the business.
Investment bank 
 In the mid twentieth century, certain investment banks started to also try and help their business clients to sell their business entirely to other businesses instead of to investors, as well as to help businesses decide what other business they should buy, in exchange for a fee based on the sale price of the business.
Investment bank 
 This activity became known as Mergers and Acquisitions and today falls into the category of investment banking.
Investment bank 
 In fact, there are many small investment banks that only offer this activity, and do not help businesses to borrow money or sell ownership in the business.
Investment bank 
 An investment bank most often helps businesses to borrow money using a form of a contract known as a bond, and to sell ownership in the company using a contract known as stock.
Investment bank 
 Most countries have developed government rules that in exchange for requirements that the business operate in a certain manner and disclose their financial results in a certain manner, they are then allowed to borrow money using bonds and sell ownership using stock to the general public, and the general public is allowed to sell bonds and stock to other members of the public without being responsible for the operations and financial disclosures of the business.
Investment bank 
 Some reasons that a business might choose to borrow money from investors instead of a bank may include the following:
Investment bank 
 The potential for an interest rate that is fixed (cannot changed) for a longer time frame than what most banks would normally allow
Investment bank 
 Investors might be more willing to lend to a company more at risk at not being able to pay than what a bank would be willing to do
Investment bank 
 Some reasons that a business owner would agree to use an investment bank to sell part or all of their business to other investors include the following:
Investment bank 
 To earn a profit on the amount they initially invested in the business (because there might be a larger number of buyers willing to buy businesses that are publicly traded, the price received for the business might be higher than if the owner sold the business to another individual)
Investment bank 
 To raise funds to pay back money that was borrowed for the business that the business owner might not be able to otherwise pay back
Investment bank 
 Investment Banks therefore work with two kinds of customers, one being the businesses/governments which desire to borrow funds or sell ownership, and the individuals and other businesses who want to earn a profit on their money by lending to or owning other businesses.
Wiesław Rudkowski 
 He won a silver medal at the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich, losing in the final against Dieter Kottysch.
Giambattista Pittoni 
 Giambattista Pittoni (or Giovanni Battista Pittoni; 6 June 1687 – 6 November 1767) was an Italian painter.
Giambattista Pittoni 
 He served as president of the Academy of Fine Arts of Venice from 1758 to 1760 and from 1763 to 1764.
Giambattista Pittoni 
 Pittoni’s depiction is of the gospel of John (6:3–13): ‘Jesus went into the mountains … a great multitude followed him, He bade them sit down, took five loaves and two fishes and, giving thanks, broke them and the disciples distributed them’.
Giambattista Pittoni 
 Bacchus and Ariadne of the Senate (1730s), Senate of the Republic (Italy), Palazzo Madama, Sala Cavour, Rome
Giambattista Pittoni 
 Death of Joseph, Berggruen Museum in Charlottenburg Palace, National Gallery (Berlin), Berlin; Oil on canvas, 97 x 79 cm
Giambattista Pittoni 
 St Jerome and St Peter of Alcantara (1725), National Gallery of Scotland, Edinburgh; Oil on canvas, 275 x 143 cm
Giambattista Pittoni 
 Miracle of the loaves and fishes (1725), National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne; oil on canvas, 120.1x178.5 cm
Giambattista Pittoni 
 Rest on the Flight into Egypt (1725), Thyssen-Bornemisza Museum, Madrid; oil on canvas, 108 x 135 cm
Giambattista Pittoni 
 Enthroned Madonna and Child venerated by Saints Peter and Pius V (1723–1724), Church of Santa Corona, Vicenza
Giambattista Pittoni 
 Martyrdom of St Clement: Sketch for Altar at Clemenskirche, Muenster, displayed at Uppsala Universitet Konstsamling
Tories 
 The Tories were one of the two political parties which existed in Britain from the 17th to the early 19th centuries.
Tories 
 After the Acts of Union 1707, the Tories were part of the United Kingdom's Parliament of Great Britain, and after the Act of Union 1800 they were part of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
Tories 
 The Tories were originally (1678 to about 1770) the supporters of the Catholic kings (Charles I and II, James I and II), limiting the power of UK Parliament and supporting freedoms for Catholics.
Tories 
 Later, (1780 to 1830) they became the New Tory Party, and were again a successful party able to hold government.
Tories 
 The most famous leaders of the New Tory Party were William Pitt the Younger, and Robert Peel the industrialist.
James Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie 
 James Andrew Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie KT, PC (22 April 1812 – 19 December 1860), known as The Earl of Dalhousie between 1838 and 1849, was a Scottish statesman and a colonial administrator in British India.
James Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie 
 Under his rule several independent Indian states were annexed by applying the doctrine of lapse, e.g. the state of Jhansi.
James Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie 
 The Kingdom of Oudh was also annexed because the governor general thought its government was corrupt.
Forced migration 
 Forced migration (also called displacements) is when people are made to leave their home or homeland.
Forced migration 
 It is usually caused by violence, persecution, danger, or because an authority (such as a government) has told people to move.
Forced migration 
 Migration of people is constantly happening, but in a stable society it usually happens because a person chooses to do it.
Forced migration 
 In some cases, such as human trafficking and slavery, people are physically removed from their homes.
Forced migration 
 Occasionally a government forces people and communities out of their homes or homelands for the purposes of economic development or military.
Forced migration 
 The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees says Afghanistan produces the most number of refugees each year.
General Secretary of the Communist Party of China 
 The General Secretary of the Communist Party of China is the leader of the Communist Party of China and the highest-ranking official within China.
General Secretary of the Communist Party of China 
 According to the Constitution, the General Secretary serves as a member of the Politburo Standing Committee, the main governing group in China.
General Secretary of the Communist Party of China 
 Since the early 1990s, the holder of the post has been, except for transitional periods, the Chairman of the Central Military Commission.
President of China 
 The President of China (officially President of the People's Republic of China) is the head of state of the People's Republic of China (PRC).
President of China 
 However, in recent years the General Secretary of the Communist Party has also served simultaneously as President.
Premier of the People's Republic of China 
 The Premier of China, officially "Premier of the State Council of the People's Republic of China", is the leader of the State Council of China, who is the head of government and holds the highest rank (Level 1) in the Civil Service.
Premier of the People's Republic of China 
 The Premier is formally approved by the National People's Congress upon the nomination of the President.
Premier of the People's Republic of China 
 In practice, the candidate is chosen through an informal process within the Communist Party of China.
Freedom Trail 
 The Black Heritage Trail crosses the Freedom Trail between the Massachusetts State House and Park Street Church.
Freedom Trail 
 In 1951, he suggested building a walking trail to connect many of the important historic places in Boston.
Freedom Trail 
 The Trail was marked with red bricks and red paint, and signs were added along the way to explain the importance of the Trail's 16 stops.
Freedom Trail 
 The costs of keeping up the Trail are supported by grants from non-profit organizations and foundations; philanthropy; donations; and Boston National Historical Park.
Freedom Trail 
 When the Puritans came to Boston, they bought the land from William Blackstone, who was the first European person to settle in Boston.
Freedom Trail 
 In 1775, when the British Army occupied Boston just before the American Revolution started, over 1,000 British soldiers camped and trained on the Common.
Freedom Trail 
 On the way from the Common to the State House, the Trail passes a monument to Robert Gould Shaw and the 54th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment.
Freedom Trail 
 On Independence Day in 1829, William Lloyd Garrison made his first major speech against slavery at the Church.