the-french-artist/wikipedia_20220301.simple_sentence_embeddings huggingface dataset:
Caroline Herschel 
 She independently discovered the second companion of the Andromeda Galaxy (Messier 110; NGC 205) and another, new, nebula.
Caroline Herschel 
 The result was published by the Royal Society in 1798 and contained an index of every observation of every star made by Flamsteed, a list of errata, and a list of more than 560 stars that had not been included.
Caroline Herschel 
 The comet 35P/Herschel-Rigollet is named in her honor, as well as the lunar crater C. Herschel, and the planetoid (281) Lucretia.
Caroline Herschel 
 Caroline Herschel was awarded a gold medal for her works in science from the Royal Astronomical Society in 1828.
Caroline Herschel 
 Toward the end of Caroline's life, she arranged two-and-a-half thousand nebulae and star clusters into zones of similar polar distances.
Frank Sinatra Jr. 
 Francis Wayne Sinatra (January 10, 1944 – March 16, 2016), professionally known as Frank Sinatra, Jr., was an American singer, songwriter, conductor and actor.
Frank Sinatra Jr. 
 Sinatra was released two days later after his father paid the $240,000 ransom demanded by the kidnappers.
Marion Patrick Jones 
 She was the author of two notable novels: Pan Beat, first published in 1973, and J’Ouvert Morning (1976).
Ralph C. Johnson 
 Johnson served as a Democratic member of the North Carolina House of Representatives from 2015 until his death in 2016.
Alexander Esenin-Volpin 
 Alexander Sergeyevich Esenin-Volpin (also written  Ésénine-Volpine and Yessenin-Volpin in his French and English publications; ; May 12, 1924 March 16, 2016) was a Soviet-born American poet and mathematician.
Alexander Esenin-Volpin 
 He spent a total of fourteen years incarcerated and repressed by the Soviet authorities in prisons, psikhushkas and exile.
Alexander Esenin-Volpin 
 In 2005, Esenin-Volpin participated in "They Chose Freedom", a four-part television documentary on the history of the Soviet dissident movement.
James Darren 
 James William Ercolani (born June 8, 1936), known by his stage name James Darren, is an American television and movie actor, television director, and singer.
James Darren 
 He was known for his roles as  Moondoggie in Gidget, Tony Newman in The Time Tunnel, and as Vic Fontaine in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.
Lexa 
 Léa Cristina Lexa Araújo, better known by the stage name Lexa, is a singer, composer and Brazilian dancer.
Lexa 
 Her first single, the "Posso Ser" song, was released in December 2014 and became one of the most played tracks on Brazilian radio in 2015.
Lexa 
 This song is part of the EP of the same title released by Lexa in March 2015 and disclosed as a preview of her first studio album.
Lexa 
 Lexa was discovered by Batutinha music producer, who, after watching it on YouTube, introduced her to entrepreneur Kamilla Fialho, who hired through K2L Entertainment Artistic agency.
Lexa 
 Thus, in December 2014 is released the first single from Lexa, the "Posso Ser" song, which reached the Top 30 on parade Hot 100 Airplay, Billboard Brazil, and became the 93rd most played song in the Brazilian radio stations in 2015.
Merrick Garland 
 Garland is the 86th and current United States Attorney General during the Joe Biden administration since 2021.
Merrick Garland 
 He was the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 2013 to 2020.
Merrick Garland 
 In 2016, Garland was nominated by President Barack Obama to the Supreme Court to replace Antonin Scalia following his death.
Merrick Garland 
 However, in a Republican-controlled senate, a confirmation hearing was never held and his nomination expired on January 3, 2017.
Merrick Garland 
 In January 2021, President-elect Joe Biden nominated Garland to be the United States Attorney General in his cabinet.
Merrick Garland 
 Garland practiced corporate litigation at Arnold & Porter and worked as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Department of Justice, where he played a leading role in the investigation and prosecution of the Oklahoma City bombers.
Merrick Garland 
 In 1995, Garland was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and (following a delay in Senate confirmation) took the bench in 1997.
Merrick Garland 
 In 2009 and 2010, Garland was considered by President Barack Obama for two openings on the Supreme Court.
Merrick Garland 
 On March 16, 2016, Obama nominated Garland to serve as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, to fill the vacancy created by the death of Antonin Scalia.
Merrick Garland 
 After Republicans refused to give Garland a confirmation hearing, Garland's nomination was expired in January 2017 shortly before the inauguration of Donald Trump.
Merrick Garland 
 On January 6, 2021, then President-elect Joe Biden said that we would nominate Garland to be the United States Attorney General during his administration.
Merrick Garland 
 On March 1, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 15-7 to advance Garland's nomination to a full Senate vote.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Article Three of the United States Constitution creates the judicial branch of the United States government.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 It creates the Supreme Court of the United States, and allows the United States Congress to create less powerful federal courts.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Section 1 of Article Three starts out by creating the Supreme Court  one court that will be more powerful than any other court in the country.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Section 1 protects the judges by saying that their salaries will not be decreased while they are in office (working as a federal judge).
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 This is meant to protect federal judges, and also to make sure that the federal judiciary is independent.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Before it won its independence in the American Revolutionary War, America was a colony of the British Empire.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 As Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, Britain's King George III "made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries."
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Judges who wanted to keep their jobs made decisions based on what King George would want, not based on what the law said.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 If judges are cannot be independent, or do not follow they law, courts are not fair, and there is no way for regular people to get justice.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 By saying judges "shall hold their Offices during good Behavior," Section 1 is basically allowing judges to keep their jobs for the rest of their lives.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 In Article Two, Section 4, the Constitution does say that Congress can take away a judge's job  but only after being convicted in a trial, and only for "Treason, Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors."
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 In other words, the Constitution makes sure that all judges will lose their jobs for making even the slightest unpopular decision.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 This denies judges the freedom to be independent, and to make the decisions that they think are fair, and makes them choose between right and reelection.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 In both Section 1 and in Article One, Section 8, the Constitution gives Congress the right to create courts that are "inferior" to the Supreme Court.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 However, the Constitution does not say how many "inferior" courts there should be, or how they should be set up.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 The U.S. Tax Court, which deals with disagreements between taxpayers and the Internal Revenue Service.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which hears appeals of some cases that were tried in military courts.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, which can review the decisions of the Board of Veterans' Appeals (an executive department).
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 For example, if a veteran files for disability benefits and the Board refuses them, the Court of Appeals could hear the case.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 The U.S. Court of Federal Claims, which hears cases that involve claims for money damages against the Federal government.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Clause 1 gives the federal courts the power to hear and judge actual "cases and controversies" only.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Cases where a state is a party (a plaintiff or a defendant; for example, a case where a person sues the state government)
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 This includes cases where the United States itself will be a party (for example, United States v. Texas)
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Cases between people who live in the same state, but are fighting over land grants in different states
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 However, the Supreme Court can only review a case on appeal if it thinks the lower court's decision breaks a law or goes against the Constitution.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Also, when Congress passed the Judiciary Act of 1789, they also never gave the federal courts this power.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 This means that the federal courts can only review or change the decisions of state supreme courts if the state decision may have broken a federal law or the Constitution.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 The federal courts had no power to review or change state supreme court decisions that were just based on state laws.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Different states could decide completely different things, so the laws might be completely different in one state than another.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 It took away the federal judiciary's power to get involved in lawsuits between states and citizens of other states or countries.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 In Marbury v. Madison (1803), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress cannot change the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Congress is able to make the rules for the federal courts' appellate division, including rules about their jurisdictions.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 This is the Supreme Court's ability to review whether a law, treaty, or executive rule breaks a law that already exists, a state Constitution, or the United States Constitution.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 After Marbury, the Supreme Court started keeping an eye on what the state and federal governments were doing, instead of just trying cases that people brought to them.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Clause 2 says that the Supreme Court has "judicial power [over] all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution [and] the Laws of the United States...."  However, it does not say exactly what this means.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Supreme Court Justice John Marshall wrote an opinion about what a "federal" case is, and what "arising under" the Constitution or federal laws means.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Clause 3 of Section 2 says that federal crimes have to be tried in front of a jury, unless the defendant does not want a jury.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 (Article One, Section 3 of the Constitution says that only the United States Senate can try impeachment cases.)
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 If they did not do the crime in any particular state, then Congress gets to choose where the trial will be held.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 Several of the Constitutional Amendments in the Bill of Rights talk more about the rights of people who are on trial in criminal or civil court.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 They also knew that in the past, in England, some kings had gotten rid of their political opponents just by accusing them of treason.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 For these reasons, the Founders wanted to make sure the Constitution said specifically what crimes were treason; what would be needed to find people guilty; and what the punishments could be.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 For example, if a group of people got together and planned to attack part of the United States, that would not be treason because they had not actually done anything yet to hurt the country.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 However, there is one punishment that the Constitution does not allow: punishing a person's family and descendants for that person's crime.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 In English law, if a person was convicted of treason, their punishment would include an "Attainder" (also called a "Corruption of Blood").
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 This meant that not only the person, but their family and heirs, would be punished and thought of as guilty.
Article Three of the United States Constitution 
 When the Founders wrote "no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted," they meant: "No heirs may be punished, and Congress can make the traitor forfeit (give up) their property, but only during their lifetime."
Samuel H. Young 
 Young died at his home in Glenview, Illinois on September 23, 2017 from complications of Alzheimer's disease at the age of 94.
Ranulph Fiennes 
 To the Ends of the Earth: The Transglobe Expedition, the First Pole-to-pole Circumnavigation of the Globe (1983),
Ranulph Fiennes 
 Home of the Blizzard: A True Story of Antarctic Survival, Birlinn Ltd, , (by Sir Douglas Mawson, foreword by Ranulph Fiennes)
Ranulph Fiennes 
 Just for the Love of it: The First Woman to Climb Mount Everest from Both Sides (2000), Free to Decide Publishing, , (by Cathy O'Dowd, foreword by Ranulph Fiennes)
Ranulph Fiennes 
 Across the Frozen Himalaya: The Epic Winter Ski Traverse from Karakoram to Lipu Lekh (2000), Indus Publishing Company, , (by Harish Kohli, foreword by Ranulph Fiennes)
Ranulph Fiennes 
 The Antarctic Dictionary: A Complete Guide to Antarctic English, (2000) Museum Victoria Publishing, , (by Bernadette Hince, foreword by Ranulph Fiennes)
Ranulph Fiennes 
 Above the World: Stunning Satellite Images From Above Earth (2005), Cassell Illustrated, a division of the Octopus Publishing Group,  (foreword by Ranulph Fiennes)
Ranulph Fiennes 
 Extreme Running (2007) Pavilion Books, , (by Dave Horsley and Kym McConnell, foreword by Ranulph Fiennes)
Ranulph Fiennes 
 Travels with My Heart: The Essential Guide for Travellers with Heart Conditions (2007) Matador, , (by Robin Liston, foreword by Ranulph Fiennes)
Ranulph Fiennes 
 Face to Face: Polar Portraits (2008), The Scott Polar Research Institute with Polarworld,  (with Huw Lewis-Jones, Hugh Brody and Martin Hartley (photographer))
Ranulph Fiennes 
 8 More Tales from the Travellers: A Further Collection of Tales by Members of the Travellers Club, M. Tomkinson Publishing,  (with Sir Chris Bonington, Sandy Gall and others)
Ranulph Fiennes 
 Running Beyond Limits: The Adventures of an Ultra Marathon Runner (2011), Mountain Media, , (by Andrew Murray, introduction by Ranulph Fiennes)
Ranulph Fiennes 
 The Last Expedition (2012), Vintage Classics  (by Captain Robert Falcon Scott, new edition introduction by Ranulph Fiennes)
State ratifying conventions 
 State ratifying conventions are one of the two ways established by Article Five of the United States Constitution for ratifying proposed constitutional amendments.
State ratifying conventions 
 All other proposed constitutional amendments have been offered to the state legislatures for ratification.
State ratifying conventions 
 The Constitution also provides that state ratifying conventions may also be used to propose a constitutional amendment.
State ratifying conventions 
 However, to date, none of the 27 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed by state conventions.
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 The show is mainly about the romance between Arnav Singh Raizada (Barun Sobti) and Khushi Kumari Gupta (Sanaya Irani).
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 The actors' voices have been recorded over (dubbing) in Tamil (as Idhu Kadhala), Telugu (as Chuppulu Kalisina Shubhavela), Malayalam (as Mounam Sammadham), Turkish (as Bir Garip Ask) and Arabic (as Men Nazra Thanya).
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 For his role as Arnav, Sobti won "Favorite TV Drama Actor" at the People's Choice Awards in 2012, and "Best Actor Popular" at the Indian Television Academy Awards in 2012.
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 He does not believe in marriage and wanted to maintain a living relationship with his ex-girlfriend Lavanya Kashyap.
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 However his arrogant and ruthless attitude changes when he falls in love with Khushi Kumari Gupta (Sanaya Irani).
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Barun Sobti as Arnav Singh Raizada: Khushi's husband, Anjali's younger brother, Akash's paternal cousin, Aarav's adoptive father (2011–2012)
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Sanaya Irani as Khushi Arnav Singh Raizada (née Kumari Gupta): Arnav's wife, Garima's sister's daughter, Garima and Shashi's adopted daughter, Payal's younger sister, Aarav's adoptive mother (2011–2012)
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Dalljiet Kaur as Anjali Singh Raizada : Shyam's ex wife, Arnav's elder sister, Akash's paternal cousin (2011–2012)
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Abhaas Mehta as Shyam Jha: Anjali's husband, Arnav's brother-in-law, Khushi's former fiancé (2011–2012)
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Deepali Pansare as Payal Singh Raizada (née Kumari Gupta): Akash's wife, Shashi's daughter, Garima's daughter, Khushi's elder sister (2011–2012)
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Akshay Dogra as Akash Singh Raizada: Payals' husband, Manorama and Manohar's son, Anjali and Arnav's maternal cousin (2011–2012)
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Sanjay Batra as Shashi Gupta: Garima's husband, Payal's father, Khushi's adopted father and maternal uncle, Madumati's younger brother (2011–2012)
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Tuhinaa Vohra/Pyumori Mehta as Garima Gupta: Shashi's 2nd wife, Payal's mother and Khushi's adopted mother, Khushi's maternal aunt (2011–2012)
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Abha Parmar as Madhumati Gupta: Shashi's elder sister, Payal's paternal aunt, Khushi's adopted paternal aunt (2011–2012)
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Jayshree T. as Devyani Devi: Anjali and Arnav's maternal grandmother and Akash's paternal grandmother, Manorama's mother-in-law, Khushi's maternal grandmother-in-law, Payal's paternal grandmother-in-law, Subhadra's childhood friend (2011–2012)
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Utkarsha Naik as Manorama Singh Raizada: Manohar's wife, Akash's mother, Payal's mother-in-law, NK's maternal aunt, Anjali and Arnav's maternal aunt (2011–2012)
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Rajesh Jais as Manohar Singh Raizada: Manorama's husband, Devyani's son, Akash's father, Anjali and Arnav's maternal uncle, Payal's father-in-law. (
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Swati Chitnis as Subhadra Devi: Anjali and Arnav's paternal grandmother, Khushi's paternal grandmother-in-law, Devyani's childhood friend (2012)
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 
 Nicole Alvares as Guest (Dance performance to Character Dheela for Anjali-Shyam's anniversary) (2010)
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 Validated on December 5, 1933, the Twenty-first Amendment (Amendment XXI) to the United States Constitution canceled the Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and ended the Prohibition Era in the United States.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 It is also the only Amendment to have been ratified by state ratifying conventions rather than by state legislatures.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 Crime had soared under Prohibition as gangsters, such as Chicago's Al Capone, became rich from a very profitable black market for alcohol.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 In 1932, wealthy industrialist John D. Rockefeller, Jr. stated in a letter: As more and more Americans opposed the Eighteenth Amendment, a political movement grew for its repeal.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 Although the U.S. Constitution provides two methods for ratifying constitutional amendments, only one method had been used up until that time.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 However, the wisdom of the day was that the lawmakers of many states were either obligated to or simply afraid of the temperance lobby.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 For that reason, when Congress formally proposed the repeal of Prohibition on February 20, 1933, it chose the other ratification method established by Article V. That is by state conventions.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 Many U.S. states still remained "dry" (with state prohibition of alcohol) long after its ratification.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 Many states now delegate the authority over alcohol granted to them by this Amendment to their municipalities or counties (or both), which has led to many lawsuits over First Amendment rights when local governments have tried to revoke liquor licenses.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 Section 2 has been the source of every Supreme Court ruling directly addressing Twenty-first Amendment issues.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 Early rulings suggested that Section 2 enabled states to legislate with exceptionally broad constitutional powers.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 In State Board of Equalization v. Young's Market Co., (1936), the Supreme Court held that a state could require a license fee for importing beer from other states and also for manufacturing beer within the state.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 The court recognized that "Prior to the Twenty-first Amendment it would obviously have been unconstitutional" for a state to require a fee for such a privilege.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 In Craig v. Boren (1976), the Supreme Court addressed the issue of proposed legislation with different ages for males and females regarding alcohol consumption in Oklahoma (age 18 for females, age 21 for males).
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 The Court overturned the motion because of a presumed violation of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 In South Dakota v. Dole (1987), the Supreme Court upheld the withholding of some federal highway funds to states in which the legal drinking age is less than twenty-one years of age is lawful.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 The Court held that the limitations on spending power in the Twenty-First Amendment did not prohibit Congress to indirectly achieve federal objectives.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 In 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island (1996), Rhode Island passed a law that banned liquor advertising from places that did not sell liquor.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 In a unanimous decision the Court held that states cannot use the Twenty-first Amendment to abridge freedom of speech protections under the First Amendment.
Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution 
 However, the Court acknowledged the state was empowered to regulate the sale of liquor under the Twenty-First Amendment.