the-french-artist/wikipedia_20220301.simple_sentence_embeddings huggingface dataset:
Child Labor Amendment 
 With the Keating–Owen Act of 1916, Congress had attempted to control interstate commerce involving goods produced by employees under the ages of 14 or 16, depending on the type of work.
Child Labor Amendment 
 Later that year, Congress attempted to levy a tax on businesses with employees under the ages of 14 or 16 (again depending on the type of work), which was struck down by the Supreme Court in Bailey v. Drexel Furniture.
Child Labor Amendment 
 It became apparent that a constitutional amendment would be necessary for such legislation to overcome the Court's objections.
Child Labor Amendment 
 The amendment was offered by Ohio Republican Congressman Israel Moore Foster on April 26, 1924, during the 68th Congress, in the form of House Joint Resolution No.
Child Labor Amendment 
 Having been approved by Congress, the proposed amendment was sent to the state legislatures for ratification.
Child Labor Amendment 
 Indiana — February 8, 1935 (After State Senate rejection – February 5, 1925 and State House rejection - March 5, 1925)
Child Labor Amendment 
 Kansas — February 25, 1937 (After rejection – January 30, 1925) no other states have ratified the Child Labor Amendment.
Child Labor Amendment 
 The following fifteen state legislatures rejected the Child Labor Amendment and did not ratify it: Connecticut (1925), Delaware (1925), Florida (1925),  Georgia (1924), Louisiana (1924), Maryland (1927), Massachusetts (1925), Missouri (1925), North Carolina (1924), South Carolina (1925), South Dakota (1925, 1933 and 1937), Tennessee (1925), Texas (1925), Vermont (1925), and Virginia (1926).
Child Labor Amendment 
 Although the act, on the part of state legislatures, of "rejecting" a proposed constitutional amendment has no legal recognition, such action does have political implications.
Child Labor Amendment 
 Of the 48 states in the Union in 1924, five have taken no action of record on the amendment: Alabama, Mississippi, Nebraska, New York and Rhode Island.
Child Labor Amendment 
 Because there are now 50 states in the Union, it cannot become law unless it is ratified by 38 states (an additional 10), although when it was submitted to the states 36 ratifications were enough.
Child Labor Amendment 
 If ever ratified by the required number of U.S. state legislatures, the Child Labor Amendment would give the Congress of the United States jurisdiction concurrent with that of the states to legislate on the subject of child labor.
Child Labor Amendment 
 In this case, child labor laws would no longer only fall under the jurisdiction of the states under the 10th Amendment.
Child Labor Amendment 
 The states would have to yield to federal law where the two conflict—which is normal procedure anyway.
Child Labor Amendment 
 After several state legislatures initially objected to the proposal during the 1920s, a number of them re-examined their position during the 1930s and decided to ratify.
Child Labor Amendment 
 They also resulted in the 1939 decision of the United States Supreme Court in the landmark case of Coleman v. Miller.
Child Labor Amendment 
 In this case it was determined that the Child Labor Amendment remains pending business before the state legislatures because the 68th Congress did not specify a deadline within which the state legislatures must act upon the Child Labor Amendment.
Child Labor Amendment 
 The Coleman v. Miller ruling formed the basis of the unusual and belated ratification of the 27th Amendment which was proposed by Congress in 1789 and ratified more than two centuries later in 1992 by the legislatures of at least three-fourths of the 50 states.
Child Labor Amendment 
 Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938 regulating the employment of those under 16 or 18 years of age.
Child Labor Amendment 
 The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of that law in United States v. Darby Lumber Co. (1941), which overturned Hammer v. Dagenhart (one of the key decisions that had motivated those in favor of the Child Labor Amendment).
Child Labor Amendment 
 After this shift, the amendment has been described as "moot" and effectively part of the Constitution; the movement for it had concluded.
Child Labor Amendment 
 The Child Labor Amendment Debate of the 1920s, Bill Kaufmann, Ludwig Von Mises Institute, November 1992
District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment 
 The District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment was a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would have given the District of Columbia full representation in the United States Congress, full representation in the Electoral college system, and full participation in how the Constitution is amended.
District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment 
 It was 22 ratifications short of the needed 38 in order for the proposed amendment to have been adopted.
District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment 
 The United States House of Representatives passed it on March 2, 1978, by a 289–127 vote, with 18 not voting.
District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment 
 With that, the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment was submitted to the state legislatures for ratification.
District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment 
 The Congress included in the text of the proposed amendment that included the requirement that ratification by three-fourths (38) of the states be completed within seven years following its passage by the Congress (i.e., August 22, 1985) in order for the proposed amendment to become part of the Constitution.
District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment 
 By placing the ratification deadline in the text of the proposed amendment, the deadline could not be extended, as had been done regarding the Equal Rights Amendment.
District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment 
 Ratification by the legislatures of at least 38 of the 50 states by August 22, 1985 was necessary for the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment to become a part of the Constitution.
District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment 
 During the seven-year period specified by Congress it was ratified by only 16 states and so failed to be adopted.
District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment 
 Had it been adopted, this proposed amendment would have given Washington, D.C. full representation in both houses of the Congress.
District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment 
 The Twenty-third Amendment does not allow Washington, D.C. to have more electoral votes "than the least populous State," nor does it grant Washington, D.C. any role in the election of a President by the House of Representatives (or that of the Vice President by the Senate).
District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment 
 In contrast, this proposed amendment would have provided Washington, D.C. full participation in the Electoral College.
District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment 
 Finally, the proposed amendment would have also allowed the Council of the District of Columbia, the Congress, or the people of Washington D.C. (depending on how this proposed amendment would have been interpreted) to decide whether to ratify any proposed amendment to the Constitution, or to apply to the Congress for a convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution, just as a state's legislature can according to the Constitutional amendment process.
District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment 
 The amendment would neither have made Washington, D.C. a state, nor affected Congress's authority over it.
Federalism in the United States 
 Federalism in the United States is the relationship between the state governments and the federal government.
Federalism in the United States 
 The Constitution says which powers the federal government has, and which powers belong to the states.
Federalism in the United States 
 The goal of federalism is to create a balance of power, so neither the states or the federal government can get too powerful.
Federalism in the United States 
 Many American colonists thought this government was corrupt and did not care about the colonists' rights.
Federalism in the United States 
 It said that the government's job was to protect people's natural rights, and if the government did not do this, the people had the right to overthrow it.
Federalism in the United States 
 In the 1760s and 1770s, the British government began passing laws that forced the colonists to pay taxes on items like printed materials and things that were made outside the colonies.
Federalism in the United States 
 The government was making them pay taxes, but the colonists had no say in what tax laws were passed, or even what their money was spent on.
Federalism in the United States 
 The next year, the colonies passed the United States Declaration of Independence, making them the new country of the United States.
Federalism in the United States 
 By 1783, thanks to help from France, Spain, and some Native American tribes, the United States won the war and its independence from the British Empire.
Federalism in the United States 
 Many Americans did not like the thought that people far away from them could make rules about their lives, like the British government had.
Federalism in the United States 
 Because of this, the United States' first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, gave most of the power to the states.
Federalism in the United States 
 For example, the Articles allowed the Continental Congress to sign treaties and declare war, but it could not raise taxes to pay for an army.
Federalism in the United States 
 The Founding Fathers  and regular Americans  began to see that the Confederation government was not working well.
Federalism in the United States 
 Some of the Founding Fathers began to suggest federalism as a solution to the problems with the Articles of Confederation.
Federalism in the United States 
 Shays' Rebellion started out as a protest by poor farmers in western Massachusetts, and ended up as an armed rebellion.
Federalism in the United States 
 Neither the federal government or the state government had enough soldiers or money to pay for an army that could stop the rebellion.
Federalism in the United States 
 Also, during the Rebellion, Massachusetts' state government took away people's right to habeas corpus (so they could keep people in jail without a trial) and their right to say bad things about the government.
Federalism in the United States 
 Many Americans began to realize that under the Articles of Confederation, their government was unable to protect them or their rights.
Federalism in the United States 
 However, power would be divided between the states and the federal government, so the federal government would not be all-powerful
Federalism in the United States 
 Their representatives would speak for what the people in each state needed and wanted, and would be able to vote on all federal laws
Federalism in the United States 
 Small and large states would get an equal number of representatives in the United States Senate, to prevent the large states from having all the power
Federalism in the United States 
 The new federal government would have three separate sections which would divide and balance power between them.
Federalism in the United States 
 The last part of the Constitution, Article 7, said that nine states would have to ratify (approve) the Constitution for it to go into effect.
Federalism in the United States 
 Some of the Founding Fathers argued strongly for federalism, especially James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay.
Federalism in the United States 
 Although they were published anonymously at the time (with nobody's real names listed), the essays were written by Madison, Hamilton, and Jay.
Federalism in the United States 
 It answered many of the arguments against federalism, and explained how the Constitution would help protect people's rights.
Federalism in the United States 
 10," James Madison wrote that federalism would help protect the republican values most Americans supported, like the importance of personal freedoms.
Federalism in the United States 
 They worried that under the new Constitution, the federal government was too strong, and had too much power over the states.
Federalism in the United States 
 After the Federalists promised to add a bill of rights to the Constitution after it was ratified, and after George Washington said he supported the new Constitution, the states ratified the Constitution.
Federalism in the United States 
 Three-fourths of the states would have to ratify these amendments in order to add them to the Constitution.
Federalism in the United States 
 It said that any powers that the Constitution did not give to the federal government belonged to the states.
Federalism in the United States 
 This was meant to calm people's worries that the federal government would try to take more and more power from the states.
Roger Agnelli 
 Roger Agnelli  (May 3, 1959 – March 19, 2016) was a Brazilian entrepreneur, banker, and corporate leader.
Roger Agnelli 
 In 2013, he was voted by Harvard Business Review as the world’s fourth best-performing chief executive officer behind Apple Inc. CEO Steve Jobs, Jeff Bezos of Amazon.com and Yun Jong-Yong of Samsung.
Roger Agnelli 
 On March 19, 2016, he was killed, along with his wife, son, and daughter (and three others) when their plane crashed in São Paulo, Brazil.
Niš 
 The city center has 187,544 people living there and the administrative area has a population of 260,237.
Sikiru Adesina 
 Sikiru Adesina (born 1971, died February 8, 2016), popularly known as Arakangudu, was a Nigerian movie actor, director and producer.
United States Reports 
 United States Reports are the official record of all the cases that the United States Supreme Court has heard.
United States Reports 
 In the United States, when lawyers want to talk or write about a Supreme Court decision, they cite the United States Reports.
United States Reports 
 This tells the lawyer that the decision of the Court in the case entitled Brown v. Board of Education (as properly abbreviated), decided in 1954, can be found in volume 347 of the United States Reports, starting on page 483.
Joseph Mercieca 
 He was known for restoring stability in the Maltese church following his predecessor Mikiel Gonzi's dispute with the Malta Labour Party.
Léonie Geisendorf 
 In 1938, after her internship, Geisendorf moved to Sweden and was hired by Sven Ivar Lind, KFAI and Paul Hedqvist.
Salmonidae 
 Although the smallest species is just  long as an adult, most are much larger, with the largest reaching .
Robert J. Healey 
 Robert John "Bob" Healey, Jr. (May 3, 1957 – March 20, 2016) was an American attorney, businessman, educator, restaurateur, and political activist.
Robert J. Healey 
 As the Moderate Party nominee for Governor in 2014, Healey won 22% of the vote while spending less than $40 on the campaign.
Flag of California 
 An earlier version of the flag was first flown during the 1846 Bear Flag Revolt and was also known as the Bear Flag.
Korematsu v. United States 
 It concerned the constitutionality of military commanders, under an executive order by the President, which ordered Japanese Americans into internment camps during World War II.
Korematsu v. United States 
 This gave military commanders the power to evacuate all persons considered a threat to national security from the West Coast of the United States to relocation centers.
Korematsu v. United States 
 Fred Korematsu, a Japanese-American who was born in the United States, refused to comply with the order.
Korematsu v. United States 
 In a 6-3 decision, the Court upheld his conviction and ruled the exclusion order was constitutional.
Korematsu v. United States 
 In the majority opinion by Justice Hugo Black, the Court ruled 6-3 that the need to protect the country from
Korematsu v. United States 
 On May 19, 1942, during World War II, Japanese Americans were ordered to be move into relocation camps by Civilian Restrictive Order No.
Korematsu v. United States 
 Fred Korematsu was a Japanese-American man who decided to stay in San Leandro, California and knowingly violated Civilian Exclusion Order No.
Korematsu v. United States 
 Korematsu argued that the Executive Order 9066 was unconstitutional and that it violated the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Lunar mare 
 They are called sea because ancient astronomers looked at the Moon and thought they saw seas and oceans on the Moon.
Lunar mare 
 The maria cover about 16% of the surface of the Moon and most of them are in the side of the moon which is visible from Earth.
Lunar mare 
 A lunar mare, Mare Tranquillitatis was the landing site for the first manned landing on the Moon on July 20, 1969, at 20:18 UTC.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 On June 25, 1990, the Court decided it was legal to require "clear and convincing evidence" that stopping life support is what a person would have wanted.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 Without the feeding tube, Cruzan would die from starvation or dehydration, because she could not swallow anything.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 She had recently told a friend that if she got badly injured or sick, she would not want to live unless she could live "at least halfway normally."
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 The court said that a person has a "fundamental natural right" in the Constitution to have someone make the decision to remove life support "when the person has no more cognitive brain function ... and there is no hope of further recovery."
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 The court said Nancy's conversation with her friend showed that she would not want to live in a persistent vegetative state.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 The person had a living will, a legal document saying what a person would want in certain medical situations (for example, saying: 'I do not want treatment if I am ever in a persistent vegetative state'); OR
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 There was "clear and convincing ... reliable evidence" that the person would have wanted to refuse treatment.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 Five of the Supreme Court Justices (judges) wrote their own opinions about the case.p.28  Four disagreed with the decision the Court made.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 However, the Court ruled, in a 5-4 vote, that the Supreme Court of Missouri made the right decision.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 They ruled that Missouri did not violate the Constitution when it required 'clear and convincing evidence' that Nancy would have wanted her life support to be ended.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 The U.S. Supreme Court did rule that competent people (people who are able to make decisions for themselves) have the right to refuse medical treatment.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 They said the Constitution gives competent people this right in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 However, it said things are different for people who are incompetent (people who cannot not make decisions for themselves  for example, because they are in a persistent vegetative state).
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 If another person wants to refuse treatment for someone who is incompetent, they have to show "clear and convincing proof" that refusing treatment is what the person would want.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 After the Supreme Court's decision, the Cruzans went back to the first trial court with new evidence.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 The court ruled that the Cruzans now had clear and convincing evidence that Nancy would have wanted her life support ended if she was in a persistent vegetative state.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 Protesters filed seven different petitions with the court to try to get Nancy's feeding tube put back in, but the court refused.p.29  Then, on December 18, nineteen people went into Nancy's hospital room and tried to reattach her feeding tube themselves; they were arrested.p.29
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 At Nancy's funeral, her father told reporters: "I would prefer to have my daughter back and let someone else be this trailblazer.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 
 The case also made many Americans interested in writing living wills and other advance directives (documents that tell doctors and family members what they want in certain medical situations, if they cannot make decisions for themselves).
Adam Darski 
 Adam Nergal Darski (sometimes just called Nergal; born Adam Michał Darski; 10 June 1977 in Gdynia, Poland) is a Polish musician and celebrity who is best known for being in the black/death metal band Behemoth.
Adam Darski 
 He likes to call himself Nergal (which comes from Babylonia mythology and is the god of plague and war).
Adam Darski 
 For a brief time, he called himself Holocausto, which was inspired by Beherit leader Nuclear Holocausto.
Adam Darski 
 He was inspired by Norway's Black Circle, so he formed together with Blasphemous (from the band Veles) and Venom (from Xantotol) and called themselves the Temple of Infernal Fire.
Adam Darski 
 Later other bands joined and far-right politics were introduced, and the group renamed the Temple of Fullmoon.
Adam Darski 
 In March 2010, Darski got in legal trouble and was faced with blasphemy charges after he publicly condemned religion and ripped a Bible up on stage in 2007.
Adam Darski 
 Darski faced up to two years in prison for ripping up the Bible, but the charges were dropped on 28 June 2010.
Adam Darski 
 In July 2012, Nergal became the newest spokesman for Demon Energy drinks that would be sold all throughout Poland.
Adam Darski 
 Nergal appeared in his full Behemoth attire on the front of four different flavors of the Demon Energy brand next to the brand's slogan of "No Limits, No Laws".
Adam Darski 
 Darski reportedly donated all of the money he earned for his placement to one of the world's best bone marrow donor centers.
Adam Darski 
 The Supreme Court said that Darski could be guilty of the crime of “offending religious feelings” even though he did not mean to.
Adam Darski 
 The case was returned to a lower court which found him guilty of “intentionally insulting the Holy Bible” but the case was dismissed because of to the statute of limitations.
Adam Darski 
 They even engaged during those years, but on 17 March 2011, the media claimed that they had called off the engagement and broken up.
Adam Darski 
 The illness was thought to have advanced far enough to make chemotherapy useless, but these reports have since been proven false.
Adam Darski 
 On 8 November 2010, Darski found a genetic bone marrow match, and he then underwent treatment to receive a bone marrow transplant.
Karaite 
 1) There are some groups of people (whose ancestors came from Central Asia) who have been called Karaite people and the languages of some of these groups of people have also been called Karaite languages.
Karaite 
 Their ancestors were a type of Christian from the Church of the East sometimes also called Keraites.
Karaite 
 Many Karaite people say that the word Karaite means "black" in the Turco-Mongol language of their ancestors.
Karaite 
 That is a traditional Central Asian way to say they were originally from the Northern Turkic tribes.
Karaite 
 2) There are also Qaraite people who are mainly Turkic and related to the Karaite people but the Qaraite people mainly converted to Islam.
Karaite 
 Most people say their name also means "black" but some of these Qaraite people themselves say their name actually comes from an Arabic word for someone good at reading the Quran.
Karaite 
 More accurately it should be spelled in English with a Q not a K, so it should be Qaraite, but Karaite is a more common spelling.
Karaite 
 This Jewish word has a completely different origin from the name used by the Karaite people and Qaraite people.