How to Avoid Vanity API Metrics and Best Measure Developer Success for Developer Platforms
Tags: api, saas
Published: 2019-07-22 16:13:58

---
title: "How to Avoid Vanity API Metrics and Best Measure Developer Success for Developer Platforms"
published: true
description:
canonical_url: https://www.moesif.com/blog/engineering/api-monitoring/How-to-Avoid-Vanity-API-Metrics-and-Best-Measure-Developer-Success-for-Developer-Platforms
cover_image: https://thepracticaldev.s3.amazonaws.com/i/abmkd94ezomep9rtfmb9.jpg
tags: api, saas
---

_[Cover image by Les Haines, on Flickr](https://www.flickr.com/photos/leshaines123/)_

---

In years of advising and consulting for many companies, from seed-stage startups to unicorns and public entities, I’ve observed many teams and businesses missing the mark when defining success metrics.

Interestingly, this is more likely the case for developer platforms. I often hear “Look at how many API keys/hours spent in development/{Marklar} were created on our platform!” As I’d respond by asking “How many active developers do you have?” or “What is the adoption rate for your partner applications?” I’d strike a nerve.

In API world, vanity metrics can be slipped in just like in any other product area. I’ve lost count of how many times companies boast to me about how many API calls are made on their system, considering that as their primary metric - and as I note inefficiencies in their API designs that inflate the metric. Often, when my client projects are successful, the number of API calls is reduced, as we design APIs that make integrations easier on our partners and on our servers.

Such errors of judgement sometimes come from high-level business KPIs that don’t align to company goals.
Others come from proper company goals, that when making their way to platform initiatives, lose alignment.
It could be that the company is, rightly, focused on growth or retention, but then executives think that can be supported by “more partners!” In such cases, when managing a developer platform, one must be ready to be critical, to say “no,” and _to keep focus on the health of your customer and developer community_.

On more than one occasion, I was asked to build out a partner ecosystem for an application marketplace, with a designed number of applications to publish. “Sure,” I’d say. “I know a partner who’s creating an _consumer-facing, not relevant to revenue_ integration, so I’ll bring in plenty of partners like that we can find easily. Or… let’s adjust our metrics”.

Then, I’d make sure we’re actually setting value according to company goals. How?

1. Understand and restate the company’s goals.
2. Understand what value points and feature gaps are supported by partners.
3. Set KPIs that focus on obtaining those partners and making them successful.

When asked or tempted to bring in X-number of partner integrations, it’s best to adjust the plan to ensure that you’re only including partners that actually generate value. Is the goal of the platform to acquire new customers? Then only count partners who are proven channel partners that bring us new customers? Are you trying to drive upsells? Then only count partners that generated clear revenue for us. Is the goal to improve retention? Then only count partners who supported existing customers, and who our Post-Sales team can confirm to have supported license renewal.

Vanity metrics are easy to create, and we all understand that they have negative consequences. Yet we easily stumble upon vanity metrics, perhaps more with APIs than UI-related metrics. Only by applying data and critically assessing your platform’s priorities and your company’s goals, can you ensure growth for your platform in the right path. Tools like [Moesif API Analytics](https://www.moesif.com/solutions/track-api-program) can help you get started measuring the right API metrics with just a quick SDK installation.

---

_This article was written by [Jeremy Glassenberg](https://twitter.com/jglassenberg) for the [Moesif blog](https://www.moesif.com/blog?int_source=devto)._