Exploring the Potential of Retrieval-Augmented Generation using Azure Open AI Solutions and build your ownGPT
Published: 2024-01-14 14:18:28

---
title: Exploring the Potential of Retrieval-Augmented Generation using Azure Open AI Solutions and build your ownGPT
published: true
date: 2023-12-30 10:30:19 UTC
tags: 
canonical_url: https://the.cognitiveservices.ninja/exploring-the-potential-of-retrieval-augmented-generation-using-azure-open-ai-solutions-and-build-your-owngpt
cover_image: https://dev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/articles/qj6d6m1p6gd0x3ektkqj.png
---

Photo by [saeed mhmdi](https://unsplash.com/@saeedanathema?utm_source=Hashnode&utm_medium=referral) on [Unsplash](https://unsplash.com/?utm_source=Hashnode&utm_medium=referral)
In the realm of artificial intelligence (AI), Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a groundbreaking approach that enhances the output of large language models (LLMs). It achieves this by referencing a reliable external knowledge base, separate from its original training data sources, before generating a response.

LLMs, the technological foundation of AI, are trained on vast volumes of data and use billions of parameters to generate unique output for tasks such as answering questions, translating languages, and completing sentences. RAG takes the already remarkable capabilities of LLMs a step further, extending their reach to specific domains or an organization's internal knowledge base without retraining the model. This makes RAG a cost-effective strategy for improving LLM output, ensuring it remains relevant, accurate, and valuable across various contexts.

## The Significance of Retrieval-Augmented Generation

LLMs are a vital AI technology that powers intelligent chatbots and other natural language processing (NLP) applications. The ultimate goal is to create bots capable of answering user questions in various contexts by cross-referencing authoritative knowledge sources. However, the nature of LLM technology introduces a degree of unpredictability in LLM responses. Additionally, the static nature of LLM training data imposes a cut-off date on the knowledge it possesses.

Several challenges are associated with LLMs, including presenting false information when the answer is unknown, providing out-of-date or generic information when the user expects a specific, current response, generating a reaction from non-authoritative sources, and creating inaccurate responses due to terminology confusion.

RAG is a solution to these challenges. It guides the LLM to retrieve relevant information from authoritative, pre-determined knowledge sources. This gives organizations more control over the generated text output and offers users insights into how the LLM generates the response.

## The Advantages of Retrieval-Augmented Generation

RAG technology offers several advantages for an organization's generative AI efforts. It provides a cost-effective implementation, ensuring that productive AI technology is more accessible and usable. RAG allows developers to supply the latest research, statistics, or news to the generative models, maintaining relevance.

RAG enhances user trust by allowing the LLM to present accurate information with source attribution. Developers gain more control with RAG, as they can test and improve their chat applications more efficiently, control and modify the LLM's information sources to adapt to changing requirements and ensure the LLM generates appropriate responses.

## The Mechanics of Retrieval-Augmented Generation

RAG introduces an information retrieval component that initially utilizes user input to extract information from a new data source. Both the user query and the relevant information are provided to the LLM, which employs the latest knowledge and its training data to generate improved responses.

The process involves creating external data, retrieving pertinent information, augmenting the LLM prompt, and updating external data. This ensures that the generative AI models can comprehend the new data, retrieve highly relevant documents, produce accurate answers to user queries, and maintain up-to-date information for retrieval.

## Retrieval-Augmented Generation vs. Semantic Search

Semantic search improves RAG results for organizations looking to incorporate extensive external knowledge sources into their LLM applications. It can efficiently scan large databases of diverse information and retrieve data more accurately.

Traditional or keyword search solutions in RAG yield limited results for knowledge-intensive tasks. In contrast, semantic search technologies handle the entire process of knowledge base preparation, saving developers the effort. They also generate semantically relevant passages and token words, ordered by relevance, to optimize the quality of the RAG payload.

## Get some practical knowledPractical Knowledge.

You might have read [my series](https://the.cognitiveservices.ninja/create-your-owngpt-in-a-protected-way-and-advance-its-potential-part-1-a-simple-web-chat-experience-targeting-chatgpt-through-aoai) on creating your GPT with Azure OpenAI Services. Why not build something similar with RAG?  
You can explore a Microsoft Repository on Github, which offers several approaches for creating ChatGPT-like experiences using your data and the Retrieval Augmented Generation pattern. This repository utilizes Azure OpenAI Service to access the ChatGPT model and Azure AI Search for data indexing and retrieval.  
Link: [https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-search-openai-demo](https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-search-openai-demo)

### Features

- Chat and Q&A interfaces
   - Explores various options to help users evaluate the trustworthiness of responses with citations, tracking of source content, etc.

   - Demonstrates possible approaches for data preparation, prompt construction, and orchestration of interaction between the model (ChatGPT) and retriever (AI Search)

   - Settings directly in the UX to tweak behavior and experiment with options

   - Performance tracing and monitoring with Application Insights

### What is the difference compared to the repository I used in the series?

That repository, used in the series, is designed for customers using Azure OpenAI Studio and Azure Portal for setup. It also includes `azd` support for those who want to deploy it entirely from scratch.

This, linked here, repository features multiple RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) approaches that combine the results of multiple API calls (to Azure OpenAI and ACS) in various ways. The other repository relies solely on the built-in data sources option for the ChatCompletions API, which employs an RAG approach on the specified ACS index. While this should suffice for most use cases, this sample might be a better choice if you require more flexibility.

This repository is also somewhat more experimental, as it is not tied to the Azure OpenAI Studio like the other repository.

This repository utilizes PDF documents, whereas the other repository is less restricted and offers persistent chat, which is unavailable here.

## Conclusion

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a powerful tool in the field of artificial intelligence that enhances the output of large language models by leveraging an external knowledge base. This revolutionary approach addresses several challenges associated with LLMs, providing accurate, relevant, and up-to-date information. RAG not only improves user trust and engagement but also offers developers more control over the generated responses. The incorporation of semantic search further optimizes the results, making the process more efficient.