The most common mistakes when using React
Tags: javascript, react, webdev, beginners
Published: 2019-09-11 19:07:36

_The article was originally posted on [my personal blog](https://claritydev.net/blog/the-most-common-mistakes-when-using-react)._

Answering React-related questions on Stack Overflow, I've noticed that there are a few main categories of issues people have with the library. I've decided to write about the most common ones and show how to handle them in hopes that it'll be helpful to those new to React or anyone in general, who's struggling with its basic concepts. Both pitfalls of using Class based components and Functional components that use hooks are covered interchangeably. 

#### 1\. Directly modifying the state

The state in React is considered immutable and therefore should not be directly changed. A special `setState` method and the setter function from `useState` hook should be used instead. Consider the following example, where you'd want to update `checked` field of a particular object in array, based on the state of a checkbox.
```javascript
    const updateFeaturesList = (e, idx) => {
      listFeatures[idx].checked = e.target.checked;
      setListFeatures(listFeatures);
    };
```
The issue with this code is that the changes to the state won't be reflected in the UI since the state is updated with the same object reference and therefore it doesn't trigger a re-render. Another important reason for not mutating the state directly is that due to it's asynchronous nature later state updates might override the ones made directly to the state, resulting in some evasive bugs. The correct way in this case would be to use the setter method of useState.
```javascript
    const updateFeaturesList = (e, idx) => {
      const { checked } = e.target;
      setListFeatures(features => {
        return features.map((feature, index) => {
          if (idx === index) {
            feature = { ...feature, checked };
          }
          return feature;
        });
      });
    };
```
By using `map` and object spread we're also making sure that we're not changing the original state items.

#### 2\. Setting wrong value types on the initial state

Setting the initial state values to `null` or an empty string and then accessing properties of that value in render as if it's an object is quite a common mistake. The same goes for not providing default values for nested objects and then trying to access them in render or other component methods. 
```javascript
    class UserProfile extends Component {
      constructor(props) {
        super(props);

        this.state = {
          user: null
        };
      }

      componentDidMount() {
        fetch("/api/profile").then(data => {
          this.setState({ user: data });
        });
      }

      render() {
        return (
          <div>
            <p>User name:</p>
            <p>{this.state.user.name}</p> // Cannnot read property 'name' of null
          </div>
        );
      }
    }
```
A similar error happens with setting value on initial state to an empty array and then trying to access n-th item from it. While the data is being fetched by an API call, the component will be rendered with provided initial state, and trying to access a property on `null` or `undefined` element will cause an error. Therefore it is important to have the initial state closely represent the updated state. In our case a correct state initialisation is as follows:
```javascript
    class UserProfile extends Component {
      constructor(props) {
        super(props);

        this.state = {
          user: {
            name: ""
            // Define other fields as well
          }
        };
      }

      componentDidMount() {
        fetch("/api/profile").then(data => {
          this.setState({ user: data });
        });
      }

      render() {
        return (
          <div>
            <p>User name:</p>
            <p>{this.state.user.name}</p> // Renders without errors
          </div>
        );
      }
    }
```
From the UX point of view, it's probably best to display some sort of loader until the data is fetched. 

#### 3\. Forgetting that `setState` is asynchronous

Another common mistake is trying to access state value right after setting it.
```javascript
    handleChange = count => {
      this.setState({ count });
      this.props.callback(this.state.count); // Old state value
    };
```
Setting new value doesn't happen immediately, normally it's done on the next available render, or can be batched to optimise performance. So accessing a state value after setting it might not reflect the latest updates. This issue can be fixed by using an optional second argument to `setState`, which is a callback function, called after the state has been updated with its latest values. 
```javascript
    handleChange = count => {
      this.setState({ count }, () => {
        this.props.callback(this.state.count); // Updated state value
      });
    };
```
It's quite different with the hooks though, since the setter function from `useState` doesn't have a second callback argument akin to that of `setState`. In this case the [official recommended way](https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/14174#issuecomment-437406821) is to use `useEffect` hook.
```javascript
    const [count, setCount] = useState(0)

    useEffect(() => {
      callback(count); // Will be called when the value of count changes
    }, [count, callback]);

    const handleChange = value => {
      setCount(value)
    };
```
It should be noted that `setState` is not asynchronous in a way that it returns a promise. So slapping `async/await` on it or using `then` won't work (another one of common mistakes). 

#### 4\. Incorrectly relying on the current state value for calculating the next state

This issue is related to the one discussed above as it also has to do with the state update being asynchronous.
```javascript
    handleChange = count => {
      this.setState({ count: this.state.count + 1 }); // Relying on current value of the state to update it
    };
```
The issue with this approach is that the value of count may not be properly updated at the moment when the new state is being set, which will result in the new state value to be set incorrectly. A correct way here is to use the functional form of `setState`.
```javascript
    increment = () => {
      this.setState(state => ({ count: state.count + 1 })); // The latest state value is used
    };
```
The functional form of `setState` has a second argument - `props` at the time the update is applied, which can be used in a similar way as state.  

The same logic applies to the `useState` hook, where the setter accepts a function as an argument.
```javascript
    const increment = () => {
     setCount(currentCount => currentCount + 1)
    };
```
#### 5\. Omitting dependency array for `useEffect`

This is one of the less popular mistakes, but happens nevertheless. Even though there are completely valid cases for omitting dependency array for `useEffect`, doing so when its callback modifies the state might cause an infinite loop.

#### 6\. Passing objects or other values of non-primitive type to the `useEffect`'s dependency array

Similar to the case above, but more subtle mistake, is tracking objects, arrays or other non-primitive values in the effect hook's dependency array. Consider the following code. 
```javascript
    const features = ["feature1", "feature2"];

    useEffect(() => {
      // Callback 
    }, [features]);
```
Here when we pass an array as a dependency, React will store only the reference to it and compare it to the previous reference of the array. However, since it is declared inside the component, `features` array is recreated on every render, meaning that it's reference will be a new one every time, thus not equal to the one tracked by `useEffect`. Ultimately, the callback function will be run on each render, even if the array hasn't been changed. This is not an issue with primitive values, like strings and numbers, since they are compared by value and not by reference in JavaScript.

There are a few ways to fix this. First option is to move variable declaration outside of the component, so it won't be recreated every render. However, in some cases this is not possible, for example if we're tracking props or tracked dependency is a part of the component's state. Another option is to use a custom [deep compare hook](https://github.com/kentcdodds/use-deep-compare-effect) to properly track the dependency references. An easier solution would be to wrap the value into `useMemo` hook, which would keep the reference during re-renders.
```javascript
    const features = useMemo(() => ["feature1", "feature2"], []);

    useEffect(() => {
      // Callback 
    }, [features]);
```
Hopefully this list will help you to avoid the most common React issues and improve understanding of the main pitfalls. 

Got any questions/comments or other kinds of feedback about this post? Let me know in the comments or on [Twitter](https://mobile.twitter.com/Clarity_89).