Hetzner Cloud Review: Revisited in 2020
Tags: hosting, webdev
Published: 2020-06-18 12:06:53

---
title: Hetzner Cloud Review: Revisited in 2020
published: true
date: 2020-06-18 12:00:00 UTC
tags: hosting,webdev
canonical_url: https://www.mskog.com/posts/hetzner-cloud-review-revisited-in-2020
---

 ![Hetzner Cloud Review: Revisited in 2020](https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/mskog-cms/2020/06/science-in-hd-3kgzvab8SMg-unsplash.jpg)

It has now been well over two years since my [Hetzner Cloud Review](https://www.mskog.com/posts/hetzner-cloud-a-quick-review/) and I thought it was time to post an updated one. I am still a happy customer at Hetzner. There has been quite a few updates since then. Hetzner Cloud now has an even nicer interface, block storage, private networks, dedicated CPU offerings and a brand new server line with AMD EPYC processors. They also have a data center in Finland now.

_If you want to give Hetzner a try then feel free to use my [referral code](https://hetzner.cloud/?ref=GjnpYTNYtgRU) to get €20 in credit to use for servers._

Back in 2018 Hetzner Cloud was in my humble opinion the best value VPS provider out there. I believe that this might still be true today. There are a couple of providers now which come close price wise but overall I still think Hetzner is #1.

My current main VPS is a CX21 with 2 CPU cores, 8GB RAM and 80GB of NVM disk. It is running quite a few things and has been chugging along now for a long time. I've had no serious downtime and only a couple of reboots here and there. Overall it has been rock solid and performance has been excellent. One of the fears of 2018 was that since Hetzner Cloud was new it would quickly get oversold and slow down considerably. I'm happy to say that this is not the case and there has been no evidence of any noisy neighbours on any of my servers.

I like to compare things to [DigitalOcean](https://www.digitalocean.com/?refcode=457e363d283d&utm_campaign=Referral_Invite&utm_medium=Referral_Program&utm_source=CopyPaste) since they are really the servers to beat. They are simple, have great features and lots of goodies like Block storage, Hosted databases, and managed Kubernetes.

Let's compare the cheapest servers available to get started. I ran a couple of quick [Geekbench 5](https://www.geekbench.com/) benchmarks to gauge the performance of each server as well.

<!--kg-card-begin: markdown-->

| | Hetzner | DigitalOcean |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Server** | CX11 | Standard 1GB Droplet |
| **CPU Architecture** | Intel Skylake | Intel Skylake |
| **Disk type** | NVM | SSD |
| **CPU MHz** | 2100 | 2300 |
| **CPU Cores** | 1 | 1 |
| **RAM** | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| **Disk space** | 20 GB | 25 GB |
| **Traffic** | 20 TB | 1 TB |
| **Geographic location** | Germany, Finland | USA, Europe, Asia |
| **Price** | $2.71 | $5 |
| **Geekbench (single core)** | 648 | 713 |
| **Geekbench (multi core)** | 682 | 710 |

<!--kg-card-end: markdown-->

So what are we looking at here? With Hetzner you get twice the RAM, 20 times the transfer, slightly lower clock speed at almost half the price of the Digital Ocean droplet. Now, DigitalOcean has a lot more to offer like different kind of server types, managed databases, object storage, load balancers and so on. Hetzner only has their servers, block storage and private networking. However, it is bang-for-buck unquestionable that Hetzners offering remains exceptionally good.

## AMD EPYC

Hetzner has a new kind of VPS with [AMD EPYC](https://www.amd.com/en/products/epyc) CPUs. These are brand new and became available in early 2020. These are essentially "souped up" versions of the other servers. Each of the previous servers has an EPYC counterpart. For example, here is a comparison between the CX31 and its EPYC sibling the CPX31. I also added a similar DigitalOcean droplet for comparison.

<!--kg-card-begin: markdown-->

| | CX31 | CPX31 | DigitalOcean |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **CPU Architecture** | Intel Skylake | AMD EPYC | Intel Skylake |
| **CPU Cores** | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| **RAM** | 8 GB | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| **Disk space** | 80 GB | 160 GB | 160 GB |
| **Traffic** | 20 TB | 20 TB | 5 TB |
| **Price** | $9.59 | $13.37 | $40 |
| **Geekbench(single core)** | 729 | 608 | 605 |
| **Geekbench(multi core)** | 1431 | 1822 | 2077 |

<!--kg-card-end: markdown-->

So what you get is twice the CPU cores and twice the disk space for less than 50% additional money. The performance per core seem to be lower on the EPYC architecture however. I did one final benchmark to compare the CPX31 to the next level of Skylake VPS:

<!--kg-card-begin: markdown-->

| | CPX31 | CX41 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **CPU Architecture** | AMC EPYC | Intel Skylake |
| **CPU Cores** | 4 | 4 |
| **RAM** | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| **Disk space** | 160 GB | 160 GB |
| **Price** | $13.37 | $17.95 |
| **Geekbench (single core)** | 608 | 649 |
| **Geekbench (multi core)** | 1822 | 2168 |

<!--kg-card-end: markdown-->

So what we are looking at here is about 30% more money for 15% additional multi core performance and twice the RAM. This looks like a great upgrade path to me when you do run out of RAM on your EPYC server.

What about other alternatives then? DigitalOcean is not the only VPS provider out there. I did a couple of other comparisons to popular VPS platforms:

<!--kg-card-begin: markdown-->

| | Hetzner | [UpCloud](https://upcloud.com/) | [Amazon Lightsail](https://aws.amazon.com/lightsail/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **CPU Architecture** | AMD EPYC | Intel Skylake | Intel Broadwell |
| **CPU Cores** | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| **RAM** | 8 GB | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| **Disk space** | 160 GB | 160 GB | 160 GB |
| **Traffic** | 20 TB | 5 TB | 5 TB |
| **Price** | $13.37 | $40 | $40 |
| **Geekbench(single core)** | 608 | 639 | 605 |
| **Geekbench(multi core)** | 1822 | 2215 | 2077 |

<!--kg-card-end: markdown-->
## Block storage

Hetzner now also has block storage. They do not offer object storage however. The difference between block and object storage is that block storage is mountable as volumes while object storage is more like [Amazon S3](https://aws.amazon.com/s3/). Let's compare Hetzner to DigitalOcean once again. I also ran a couple of naive read/write tests to gauge performance. Please don't take these as exact numbers but as a rough estimate.

<!--kg-card-begin: markdown-->

| | Heztner | DigitalOcean |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Storage class** | SSD | SSD |
| **Replication** | Yes | Yes |
| **Minimum volume size** | 10 GB | 1 GB |
| **Maximum volume size** | 10 TB | 16 TB |
| **Maximum volumes per server** | 16 | 7 |
| **Read performance** | 309 MB/s | 310 MB/s |
| **Write performance** | 284 MB/s | 168 MB/s |
| **Price/GB** | $0.04 | $0.1 |

<!--kg-card-end: markdown-->

Hetzner is about half the price of DigitalOcean while performance remains excellent.

## Unfair comparison

So we have established that the price/performance ratio of the Hetzner VPS offering is superior to popular platforms such as DigitalOcean, but that is not an entirely fair comparison. DigitalOcean has a lot more to offer than just "bare metal" virtual servers. If you bear with me here we are going to do one final table to compare features:

<!--kg-card-begin: markdown-->

| | Hetzner | DigitalOcean |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Block storage** | Yes | Yes |
| **Private networking** | Yes | Yes |
| **Backups** | Yes | Yes |
| **Snapshots** | Yes | Yes |
| **Floating IPs** | Yes | Yes |
| **Server graphs** | Yes | Yes |
| **API** | Yes | Yes |
| **Object storage** | No | **Yes** |
| **CDN** | No | Yes |
| **Load balancers** | No | **Yes** |
| **Managed databases** | No | **Yes** |
| **Managed Kubernetes** | No | Yes |
| **DNS** | No | Yes |
| **Docker registry** | No | Yes |
| **Data centers on multiple continents** | No | **Yes** |

<!--kg-card-end: markdown-->

DigitalOcean also offers flexible server plans with better CPU or more RAM and such. They also have managed databases as well as Kubernetes. In my opinion the most important part is that DigitalOcean offers deployment on other continents than Europe. If you choose Hetzner you can either deploy your servers in Germany or Finland. On DigitalOcean you have the option of New York, Amsterdam, San Francisco, Singapore, London, Frankfurt, Toronto and Bangalore.

I don't know what Hetzner is planning on doing in the future, but I don't think it is reasonable to expect them to introduce features like managed databases. Hetzner does have some [managed servers](https://www.hetzner.com/managed-server) but the vast majority of their services are "bare metal" servers. I wouldn't hold out for any kind of expansion into other continents either, especially not these days.

There are some others offering competitive pricing like [OVH](https://www.ovhcloud.com/en/vps/) and [Genesis](https://genesishosting.com/genesis_public_cloud_vm_pricing_table.html). I might take a look at these in a future post.

### Conclusion

Hetzner Cloud remains a very competitive service when you need a "bare metal" VPS at the lowest possible price and you still get amazing performance. If you're ok with hosting your applications in Europe and you don't need anything fancy like managed Kubernetes then you simply cannot go wrong with Hetzner. I remain a happy customer myself and I see no reason at all to look elsewhere at this time.