The Difference Between Automated Penetration testing And Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Published: 2023-06-30 05:43:37


![Image description](https://dev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/articles/enuk42e7sf3wck3mb4zq.jpg)

Dynamic Application Security Testing**(DAST) and Penetration Testing serve crucial roles in identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities in software applications. Nonetheless, it is essential to grasp the key differences between these two methods.

**Definition of DAST:**

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) is a crucial aspect of security testing performed during the application's runtime. This method involves:

- Actively engaging with the application.
- Mimicking user interactions.
- Systematically identifying and evaluating potential [vulnerabilities](https://www.prancer.io/developers-guide-to-owasp-top-10-api-security-vulnerabilities-and-mitre-attack-framework-relation/).

By simulating real-world usage scenarios, DAST provides valuable insights into the application's security posture, helping organizations enhance their overall application security and mitigate potential security risks.

**Definition of Penetration Testing:**

Penetration testing, also called "[pen testing](https://www.prancer.io/penetration-methods-and-tools/)," is a proactive security testing method aimed at actively exploiting vulnerabilities within a system or application. It simulates the behavior of malicious actors, enabling the identification of potential vulnerabilities that attackers may exploit. This testing approach plays a crucial role in assessing the security posture of a system or application and helps organizations address and mitigate potential security risks.

**Where in the Software Development Lifecycle Each Testing Will be Done:**
Application Security Testing, commonly known as DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing), is an integral part of the software [development lifecycle](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_development_life_cycle), usually conducted during the testing phase. This testing is performed after the application is developed but before deployment. Its primary purpose is to identify emerging vulnerabilities during development and guarantee the application's security before production deployment. DAST is vital in ensuring comprehensive application and overall system security.

On the flip side, penetration testing is typically conducted post-deployment of the application in a production environment. Its primary purpose is to uncover vulnerabilities that might have been overlooked during earlier development stages and to guarantee the application's security while in active use by real users. This comprehensive testing approach strengthens application security and identifies and remedies potential security risks.

**Why Companies Need Both DAST and Automated Penetration Testing Tools:**

![Image description](https://dev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/articles/ehfgqsgw0oddpxu6wfyb.jpg)


Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and penetration testing are crucial components in identifying and addressing vulnerabilities within software applications. While they serve distinct purposes, their combined usage offers a comprehensive approach to bolstering application security.

DAST is specifically designed to uncover vulnerabilities that become exposed during application runtime. It examines the application from an external perspective, simulating real-world attack scenarios. On the other hand, penetration testing focuses on identifying vulnerabilities that can be exploited by potential attackers, providing valuable insights into the application's security posture.

Companies should employ both DAST and penetration testing tools to ensure the utmost security of their applications. This strategic combination allows for a holistic assessment, covering vulnerabilities present during runtime and those that malicious actors could leverage. Organizations can proactively address vulnerabilities and fortify their application security by integrating these practices.

By prioritizing application security and implementing a comprehensive approach incorporating DAST and penetration testing, companies can confidently safeguard their applications from potential threats and mitigate security risks effectively.
Utilizing Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and penetration testing tools offers companies a holistic solution for identifying a broad spectrum of vulnerabilities and ensuring the security of their applications against a wide array of potential threats. By adopting this comprehensive approach, companies can effectively mitigate the risk of data breaches, security incidents, and potential harm to the integrity and reputation of their applications. Prioritizing application security and overall security, this dual approach provides a robust defense mechanism to safeguard critical systems and sensitive data.

**Conclusion:**
[Prancer](https://www.prancer.io/), both Automated Penetration Testing and DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing), possess distinct advantages and limitations in vulnerability identification within software systems. Automated Penetration testing offers a holistic approach by simulating real-world attacks, providing a comprehensive assessment. On the other hand, DAST yields more precise results as it directly interacts with the target system. Selecting between the two methodologies depends on the organization's specific requirements and the characteristics of the software under examination.