Elaborative Comparison Between Automated and Manual Testing
Tags: automated, and, manual, testing
Published: 2023-06-26 11:44:30

![Image description](https://dev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/articles/06j8yxrsu7p2gtqlm7ik.jpg)
It is a quite known fact that testing software applications can be broadly classified as automated or manual. As the term suggests “manual testing” is basically tests created and executed by human beings without taking prior help from any sort of automated tools. The process involves the potential use of scripts and manually created tools for effective results. To be more specific about manual testing vs automation testing, you need to consider some of the essential factors that an organization might never compromise including time, cost management, accuracy, and quality of the outcome. The ultimate goal of a test is to ensure that the software works strikingly well enough to be pointed out as efficient and superior to others.  In this article, there will be discussions about the different types of testing, their comparison, and proper guidance.

Testing software application needs special attention
Choosing the right approach depends on several factors, such as the complexity of the software, the testing requirements, the development lifecycle, and the time available for testing. Testing is a critical part of the software development process that requires special attention. The right testing approach can help ensure that the software functions properly and meets the end-users’ expectations. You can select one based on the requirement of the software application and achieve optimal results.

**Key differences, benefits, and drawbacks you must know**

**Manual testing**: Manual testing involves human testers who conduct tests on the software application. They go through each scenario and use case, taking note of any bugs, glitches, or defects they may encounter. 

**Here are some key benefits of manual testing**: 

**It requires fewer technical skills** – since manual testing involves human testers, it requires minimal programming skills.
 
**It is suitable for exploratory testing** – manual testing is ideal for exploratory testing, where testers can pick up bugs and defects that were not previously known. 

**However, manual testing does have some drawbacks**: 

**It is time-consuming** – manual testing requires a lot of time, which can result in delays in the software release cycle. 

**It is prone to human error** – manual testing can be prone to errors since humans can miss bugs and defects due to human limitations. 

**Automation testing**: Automation testing involves the use of tools and software to write and execute test cases. This method of testing is highly efficient, and accurate and is ideal for repetitive tasks such as regression testing. 

**Here are some key benefits of automation testing**: 

**It saves time and resources** – automation testing is quicker and requires fewer resources, reducing the time it takes to conduct tests. 

**It increases accuracy** – automation testing reduces the chances of human error, making it a more accurate method of testing.
However, automation testing also has some drawbacks: 

**It requires technical skills** – automation testing requires skilled testers with technical programming knowledge. 

**It is not suitable for exploratory testing** – automation testing is not ideal for exploratory testing since the test cases are pre-defined. 

**Conclusion**

You’ll know that both manual and automation testing have their benefits and drawbacks if you have gone through the official Opkey website. Manual testing is ideal for exploratory testing and testing the usability and user experience of an application. Automation testing is suitable for regression testing and is highly efficient and accurate. The choice between manual and automation testing depends on the specific needs of the project, with both methods having a place in the software testing process.