Bun is delicious. But why was it baked?
Tags: javascript, node, bunjs
Published: 2023-09-16 11:15:00

---
title: Bun is delicious. But why was it baked?
published: true
date: 2023-09-16 10:39:07 UTC
tags: javascript, nodejs, bun
canonical_url: https://blog.sanjaybabu.dev/shortcomings-of-nodejs
cover_image: https://dev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/articles/q9743sx07j9aol7f44gk.jpg
---

Bun is a brand new javascript runtime designed to be a "drop-in replacement for Node.js". The 3 pillars of Bun according to their website are:

- Blazing fast performance.

- Elegant & optimized APIs

- Cohesive DX

Check out their [announcement](https://bun.sh/blog/bun-v1.0) for more details.

The first impressions are great. It has certainly piqued my curiosity and I am going to try it out for sure. But enough about it. This blog isn't to talk about how great Bun is. But to talk about why it was needed in the first place. Even though Bun is a promising new JavaScript runtime, node.js is still the more mature platform with a larger ecosystem. Like all things in life, node.js isn't perfect. So we have had many runtimes come up in recent years to address the cons of node.js. As a result, it is still important to understand the shortcomings of Node.js.  
Let's discuss the major disadvantages of node.js. For each of them, let's see

- What is it?

- Why does it occur?

- Where does it occur? with a real-life app example

- Workaround in node.js

### **Blocking I/O Operations**

**What?**  
Node.js is designed for non-blocking, event-driven I/O operations. However, it can suffer from performance issues when dealing with a lot of synchronous or blocking I/O operations.

**Why?**  
When a Node.js application performs blocking I/O operations, it can cause the event loop to stall, affecting the application's responsiveness and potentially leading to slower request processing.

**Where?**  
Consider a file upload service that processes and stores large files. If Node.js blocks while reading or writing files, it can slow down the upload process for other users, resulting in a poor user experience.

**Workaround**  
To mitigate blocking I/O issues, you can use asynchronous versions of I/O operations or delegate blocking tasks to worker threads. The effectiveness of these workarounds depends on the specific use case. Using asynchronous I/O operations is recommended for most cases, but for CPU-bound tasks, offloading them to worker threads may be necessary. Be mindful of the added complexity when choosing a workaround.

### **Single-threaded Nature**

**What?**  
Node.js is single-threaded, which means it operates on a single process. This can be a disadvantage when handling CPU-intensive tasks because it can lead to blocking the event loop.

**Why?**  
In Node.js, when a CPU-intensive task is being processed, it can block the entire event loop, making your application less responsive to other incoming requests or tasks.

**Where?**  
Imagine a real-time gaming server using Node.js. If a single thread is occupied with a CPU-intensive task, such as collision detection or physics calculations for one player, it could delay updates for all other players, causing lag and a poor gaming experience.

**Workaround**  
One common workaround is to offload CPU-intensive tasks to worker threads or external processes. Node.js provides the `worker_threads` module for this purpose. While this can help mitigate the issue by allowing parallel processing of tasks, it adds complexity to your application. Whether to use this workaround depends on your specific use case. If CPU-bound tasks are rare and can be isolated, it may be worth using worker threads. However, if your application frequently faces CPU-bound tasks, you might consider using a different runtime or language more suited to parallel processing.

### **Limited Multi-core Scalability**

**What?**  
Node.js's single-threaded nature limits its ability to fully utilize multi-core CPUs, which can be a bottleneck for applications that require high levels of concurrency.

**Why?**  
Since Node.js primarily runs on a single thread, it can't take full advantage of multi-core CPUs by default. This means that, for CPU-bound tasks, Node.js won't be as efficient as other runtime environments designed for multithreading.

**Where?**  
In applications like video streaming services or data processing pipelines, where handling multiple concurrent requests or tasks is crucial, Node.js may not scale as well as alternatives like Python with multi-threading or Go with goroutines.

**Workaround**  
To address limited multi-core scalability, one approach is to use clustering. Node.js provides a built-in module `cluster` that allows you to create multiple child processes, each running on a separate core. This can distribute the workload across cores, but it adds complexity and requires careful management. Alternatively, for CPU-bound tasks, consider using a different runtime or language designed for multi-threading or multi-processing, depending on your application's needs.

### **Memory Consumption**

**What?**  
Node.js applications can consume a significant amount of memory, especially when handling many concurrent connections or large data sets.

**Why?**  
Node.js uses a V8 JavaScript engine, which loads and compiles JavaScript code into memory. When dealing with a large number of requests, each requiring memory allocation, it can lead to high memory usage.

**Where?**  
Consider a social media platform with millions of users. Handling simultaneous connections, user data, and media files can lead to substantial memory consumption, impacting server performance and requiring more resources.

**Workaround**  
To manage memory consumption in Node.js, you can implement strategies like connection pooling, optimizing your code for memory efficiency, and scaling horizontally by adding more server instances. Additionally, monitoring tools can help identify memory leaks and bottlenecks. Choosing the appropriate instance size or containerization strategy based on your memory requirements is crucial.

### **Callback-based Code**

**What?**  
Callback hell, also known as callback pyramids, can make Node.js code harder to read and maintain due to its reliance on callbacks.

**Why?**  
Node.js's asynchronous nature often leads to deeply nested callbacks, which can become challenging to manage as code complexity increases.

**Where?**  
In a real-time chat application, handling multiple concurrent users and messages can result in complex, nested callback structures, making the codebase difficult to understand.

**Workaround**  
To address callback-based code, it's advisable to use Promises or async/await, which provide more structured and readable ways to handle asynchronous operations. These constructs are highly effective and should be used to improve code quality and maintainability. However, it may take some effort to refactor existing callback-based code.

Ryan Dahl, the creator of node.js has also released [Deno](https://deno.com/) recently marketed as next-gen Javascript runtime which addresses the problems of node.js. It will be interesting to learn how the Bun team has handled these shortcomings and compare how it stacks up against both Deno & node.js. But that's a topic for another day. Adios!