Understanding Regression Testing vs. Retesting
Tags: softwaretesting, qualityassurance, regressiontesting, retesting
Published: 2023-08-21 17:45:45

Introduction

As a software tester, you're well aware that maintaining software quality is paramount. Two cornerstones of software testing, Regression Testing and Retesting, hold key roles in this endeavor. In this post, we'll explore these concepts, drawing distinctions through practical examples.

Regression Testing

Regression testing entails a comprehensive examination to confirm that recent code changes don't disrupt existing software functionalities. It's akin to ensuring that the latest touch-ups to a timeless painting don't alter its essence.

**Example:**

Imagine you're part of a team working on a sprawling e-commerce platform. The development crew has just made substantial changes to the payment processing module, primarily aimed at boosting security. Now, their concern is whether these changes have inadvertently triggered any glitches or disrupted existing payment methods.

Here's how regression testing unfolds in this context:

1. **Baseline Testing**: Initially, the payment methods underwent rigorous testing to establish a baseline.

2. **Code Amendments**: With the security enhancements integrated, you receive the updated code.

3. **Regression Test Suite**: You've got a set of predefined test cases covering various payment scenarios.

4. **Test Execution**: These test cases are applied to the modified payment module. If any test fails or exhibits unexpected behavior, it signals a regression issue - a novel problem arising from the recent changes.

5. **Bugs Unveiled**: If discrepancies emerge, you document them, and the development squad rectifies these before the software release.

In essence, regression testing acts as an ongoing safety net, ensuring that recent modifications haven't compromised established functionalities.

Retesting

Retesting, conversely, is a more targeted approach. It involves examining a specific functionality or feature that has undergone adjustments or bug fixes, with the aim of confirming that the reported issue has been successfully addressed. Think of it as double-checking that a stain you tried to remove from a shirt has indeed disappeared.

**Example:**

Suppose you stumbled upon a critical bug in the 'Add to Cart' feature of the e-commerce platform. Whenever a user added an item to the cart, it mysteriously duplicated. The development team diligently worked to fix this issue, and it's now your task to retest it.

Here's how retesting plays out:

1. **Initial Bug**: You initially reported the issue, including precise steps to replicate it.

2. **Development Fix**: Developers investigated and resolved the bug.

3. **Retesting Phase**: Your role now is to rigorously follow the exact steps you initially provided to reproduce the bug. If the bug no longer rears its head, you can confidently assert that the problem has been successfully rectified.

4. **Closing the Chapter**: If the bug vanishes during your retesting, you mark the issue as resolved and close the bug report.

The crux here is that retesting zeroes in on a specific issue, confirming its resolution, while regression testing maintains a broader focus to detect inadvertent side effects.

Conclusion

In sum, regression testing and retesting are pivotal components of software testing, each possessing a distinct purpose. Regression testing acts as a safeguard against unintended consequences of code modifications across the entire application, while retesting verifies the successful resolution of specific issues. As a software tester, mastering these techniques is indispensable in your role to guarantee a robust and glitch-free software product.