Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs
Tags: machinelearning, ai, beginners, datascience
Published: 2024-05-01 13:03:36

*This is a Plain English Papers summary of a research paper called [Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/eyes-wide-shut-exploring-visual-shortcomings-multimodal). If you like these kinds of analysis, you should subscribe to the [AImodels.fyi newsletter](https://aimodels.substack.com) or follow me on [Twitter](https://twitter.com/mikeyoung44).*

## Overview

- Explores the visual shortcomings of multimodal large language models (LLMs)
- Introduces the Multimodal Visual Patterns (MMVP) benchmark to identify "CLIP-blind" image-text pairs
- Examines the performance of several prominent multimodal LLMs on the MMVP benchmark

## Plain English Explanation

Multimodal large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can process and understand both text and images. However, [this paper](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/review-multi-modal-large-language-vision-models) suggests that these models may have significant blind spots when it comes to visual perception.

The researchers created a new benchmark called the Multimodal Visual Patterns (MMVP) to test the visual capabilities of multimodal LLMs. The MMVP is designed to identify "CLIP-blind" image-text pairs - that is, pairs that are easily recognized by the CLIP model (a state-of-the-art visual-language model), but prove challenging for other multimodal LLMs.

By evaluating several prominent multimodal LLMs on the MMVP benchmark, the researchers were able to uncover notable differences in their visual understanding capabilities. This suggests that while these models excel at language tasks, they may still struggle with certain types of visual perception and reasoning.

## Technical Explanation

The paper begins by highlighting the impressive progress made in [multimodal large language models](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/from-image-to-video-what-do-we) - models that can process and understand both text and images. However, the authors argue that these models may have significant blind spots when it comes to visual perception.

To explore this, the researchers introduce the Multimodal Visual Patterns (MMVP) benchmark. The MMVP is designed to identify "CLIP-blind" image-text pairs - that is, pairs that are easily recognized by the CLIP model (a state-of-the-art visual-language model), but prove challenging for other multimodal LLMs.

The authors describe their process for [finding these CLIP-blind pairs](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/blink-multimodal-large-language-models-can-see), which involves training a CLIP-based model to identify image-text pairs and then selecting pairs that the model can recognize but other multimodal LLMs struggle with.

The paper then evaluates the performance of several prominent multimodal LLMs, including [CLIP](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/contrasting-intra-modal-ranking-cross-modal-hard), METER, and BEIT, on the MMVP benchmark. The results reveal notable differences in the visual understanding capabilities of these models, suggesting that while they excel at language tasks, they may still struggle with certain types of visual perception and reasoning.

## Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable [survey of current multimodal large language models](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/exploring-frontier-vision-language-models-survey-current) and highlights an important limitation in their visual understanding capabilities. The MMVP benchmark is a clever and well-designed tool for uncovering these shortcomings.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific reasons why these models struggle with certain types of visual patterns. More research is needed to understand the underlying architectural or training factors that contribute to these blind spots.

Additionally, the paper focuses on a relatively narrow set of multimodal LLMs and may not capture the full range of visual capabilities across the field. Expanding the evaluation to include a wider variety of models could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the state of the art in multimodal AI.

## Conclusion

This paper offers a thought-provoking exploration of the visual shortcomings of multimodal large language models. By introducing the MMVP benchmark and evaluating several prominent models, the researchers have uncovered important limitations in the visual understanding capabilities of these powerful AI systems.

The findings from this work highlight the need for continued research and development in the field of multimodal AI, as there is still much work to be done to bridge the gap between human-level visual perception and the abilities of current state-of-the-art models. As the field continues to advance, it will be crucial to address these visual blind spots to unlock the full potential of multimodal AI systems.

**If you enjoyed this summary, consider subscribing to the [AImodels.fyi newsletter](https://aimodels.substack.com) or following me on [Twitter](https://twitter.com/mikeyoung44) for more AI and machine learning content.**