Who thought of comparing Blazor vs. React?
Tags: blazor, react, reactnative
Published: 2024-06-18 11:49:49

I have. So here we go:

When comparing [Blazor and React](https://bluebirdinternational.com/blazor-vs-react/), it’s crucial to consider performance, the study aspect and the support it gets. This is a summary but reading a lot more enhanced analysis make is you better — -> look at what I have just linked earlier.

## Blazor Overview

Blazor, developed by Microsoft, allows developers to use C# and HTML to build web user interfaces. It supports both client-side applications via WebAssembly and server-side applications with ASP.NET!

**Key Features of Blazor**

- Uses C# and HTML.
- Supports client-side and server-side applications.
- Leverages latest web standards without needing additional plugins.
- Facilitates easy sharing of libraries and code.

**Blazor Present State and Features**

![Image description](https://dev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/articles/cnvpf0dklnufs8045fzx.png)

## React Overview

React, developed by Facebook, is a widely used JavaScript library for building user interfaces. It promotes a component-based architecture using JSX, combining HTML and JavaScript.

**Key Features of React**

- JSX: Combines HTML-like code within JavaScript.
- Virtual DOM: Efficient rendering and updates.
- Server-side Rendering: Improves load times and SEO.
- Strong Ecosystem: Extensive libraries, tools, and community support.

## Performance Comparison: Blazor vs. React

### Initial Load Times

React: Faster due to its lightweight library.
Blazor WebAssembly: Larger download sizes can result in longer load times.

### Browser Compatibility

React: Broader compatibility across browsers.
Blazor WebAssembly: Limited by WebAssembly support.

### Computational Performance

Blazor WebAssembly: Near-native performance for intensive tasks.
React: May face limitations in complex calculations.

### Data Handling and Rendering

React: Efficient updates with virtual DOM.
Blazor: Server-side prerendering and virtualization enhance data handling.

## Use Cases and Suitability

**Blazor**

Ideal for .NET developers and projects relying on the .NET ecosystem.
Suitable for real-time applications with SignalR integration and offline capabilities.

**React**

Widely used for large-scale applications and JavaScript-based projects.
Suitable for projects requiring server-side rendering and modular codebase.

## What’s the support behind it?

**React**

- Large, established community with extensive libraries and tools.
- Regular updates and improvements.

**Blazor**

- Growing, active community.
- Regular updates from Microsoft and community contributions.

## How hard is it to learn?

**Blazor**

- Easier for .NET and C# developers due to familiarity.
- Smooth transition from backend to web development.

**React**

- Requires learning JSX and component-based architecture.
- Flexible and efficient once familiar with concepts.

## Summary
Blazor and React offer unique advantages for different use cases. Blazor is best for .NET and C# developers, while React suits JavaScript-based projects and large-scale applications.

**Framework Comparison**

![Image description](https://dev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/articles/6bcjktlhaw1t47fie2gr.png)