Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data
Tags: machinelearning, ai, beginners, datascience
Published: 2024-06-07 17:52:20

*This is a Plain English Papers summary of a research paper called [Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/will-we-run-out-data-limits-llm). If you like these kinds of analysis, you should subscribe to the [AImodels.fyi newsletter](https://aimodels.substack.com) or follow me on [Twitter](https://twitter.com/mikeyoung44).*

## Overview

- This paper investigates the potential constraints on the scaling of large language models (LLMs) due to the availability of public human-generated text data.
- The researchers forecast the growing demand for training data based on current trends and estimate the total stock of public human text data.
- They explore how progress in language modeling can continue when human-generated text datasets cannot be scaled any further.

## Plain English Explanation

As large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and BERT have become increasingly powerful, there is a growing demand for the vast amounts of text data needed to train them. The authors of this paper examine whether the supply of publicly available human-generated text data will be able to keep up with the growing appetite for training data.

The researchers project that if current trends in LLM development continue, the models will be trained on datasets roughly equal in size to the total available stock of public human text data between 2026 and 2032, or even slightly earlier if the models are overtrained. This suggests that we may be approaching the limits of what can be achieved by simply scaling up the training data.

To overcome this potential bottleneck, the authors propose several alternative strategies. These include [generating synthetic data](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/utilizing-large-language-models-to-generate-synthetic), [leveraging transfer learning from data-rich domains](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/beyond-human-data-scaling-self-training-problem), and [improving the data efficiency of language models](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/tale-tails-model-collapse-as-change-scaling). By exploring these approaches, the researchers aim to identify ways for progress in language modeling to continue even when human-generated text datasets reach their limits.

## Technical Explanation

The researchers analyzed the current trends in LLM development and the available stock of public human text data to assess the potential constraints on model scaling. They forecast the growing demand for training data based on the observed scaling laws, which suggest that model performance scales with the square root of the dataset size.

The authors then estimated the total stock of public human text data by aggregating various web crawl datasets, Wikipedia, and other openly available sources. Their analysis indicates that if current LLM development trends continue, models will be trained on datasets roughly equal in size to the available stock of public human text data between 2026 and 2032, or even slightly earlier if the models are overtrained.

To address this potential bottleneck, the researchers explore several strategies. These include [generating synthetic data using large language models](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/utilizing-large-language-models-to-generate-synthetic), [leveraging transfer learning from data-rich domains](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/beyond-human-data-scaling-self-training-problem), and [improving the data efficiency of language models](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/tale-tails-model-collapse-as-change-scaling). By pursuing these approaches, the authors aim to identify ways for progress in language modeling to continue even when human-generated text datasets reach their limits.

## Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful analysis of the potential constraints on LLM scaling posed by the availability of public human-generated text data. The researchers make a compelling case that we may be approaching the limits of what can be achieved by simply scaling up the training data.

However, the paper does not address the potential impact of alternative data sources, such as private or proprietary datasets held by large technology companies. It also does not consider the possibility of further advancements in data augmentation techniques or the emergence of new, more efficient model architectures.

Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the technical challenges and does not delve into the broader societal implications of the growing reliance on synthetic data or the potential risks of over-reliance on language models trained on limited data sources. Further research in these areas would be valuable.

## Conclusion

This paper highlights a critical challenge facing the continued progress of large language models: the potential constraints posed by the availability of public human-generated text data. The researchers provide a thoughtful analysis of this issue and propose several strategies to overcome this bottleneck, such as synthetic data generation, transfer learning, and improved data efficiency.

By exploring these approaches, the authors aim to identify ways for progress in language modeling to continue even when human-generated text datasets reach their limits. This work has important implications for the future development of large language models and their potential impact on various domains, from natural language processing to artificial intelligence more broadly.

**If you enjoyed this summary, consider subscribing to the [AImodels.fyi newsletter](https://aimodels.substack.com) or following me on [Twitter](https://twitter.com/mikeyoung44) for more AI and machine learning content.**