English: Well, I disagree that there's a complete lack of this funding. At the end of the day, we've had devolution here in Wales for 25 years. We have just over 3 million of population. The billions that come into Wales - is it £18 billion? It's you that's out of order even asking a question like that. So, the Welsh Government needs to explain how this has been reduced, despite the target to meet 100 per cent of its electricity needs from renewable sources by 2035. Funding going towards the tidal lagoon challenge, tidal lagoon project, ports infrastructure, wave and tidal stream, it is puzzling as to why the Welsh Government has now decided to reduce spending on this portfolio. Now, let's turn to the issue of housing. Whilst the Welsh Government rightfully praises the support generated through the housing support grant, it fails to prioritise this as an area. The Welsh Government claims it is increasing its focus on the housing support grant. They say that in one breath and yet, in real terms, it's got a cut of 8 per cent. The funding is due to remain the same as last year, with £166.7 million allocated. This is particularly concerning, as the grant aims to help vulnerable people with issues they face, and we can see they exacerbate now the risk of homelessness. We can also see the risk of violence against women, domestic abuse and sexual violence. Moving on to building safety funding: that's set to receive a 37 per cent reduction in resource from the indicative budget, despite the indicative budget setting aside £9.5 million for 2023-24. This draft budget now shows an allocation has dropped to £6 million. It makes an absolute mockery of the Welsh Government's claim that building safety is a top priority. If that's one of your top priorities, well, I wouldn't like to see anything else lower on that list. With 261 expressions of interest received for the Welsh building safety fund, and 163 of those requiring intensive surveys, the extent of fire risk in Wales is clear. Whilst the £135 million in capital for building safety is needed, the Welsh Government must match its words and treat building safety as one of your top priorities. It is only fair that our constituents have a safe place to live. This, of course, the actions of the Welsh Government, now stands in direct contrast to the UK Government's tough new ultimatum on cladding, giving developers hard deadlines to pay up to fix unsafe buildings. The market housing national empty homes grant scheme will only bring 2,000 empty homes back into use. With 22,140 long-term empty properties in Wales, this is just - well, it's a non-realistic figure. There's no ambition, no aspiration to get those empty homes back into use by people who desperately need them.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n anghytuno bod diffyg llwyr o'r cyllid hwn. Ar ddiwedd y dydd, rydym ni wedi bod â datganoli yma yng Nghymru ers 25 mlynedd. Mae gennym ni boblogaeth o ychydig dros 3 miliwn. Y biliynau sy'n dod i mewn i Gymru - £18 biliwn? Chi sy'n amhriodol yn hyd yn oed gofyn cwestiwn fel yna. Felly, mae angen i Lywodraeth Cymru egluro sut mae hyn wedi'i leihau, er gwaetha'r targed i ddiwallu 100 y cant o'i anghenion trydan o ffynonellau adnewyddadwy erbyn 2035. Mae'r arian sy'n mynd tuag at yr her morlyn, prosiect morlyn, seilwaith porthladdoedd, tonnau a llanw, yn peri penbleth pam mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi penderfynu lleihau gwariant ar y portffolio yma erbyn hyn. Nawr, gadewch i ni droi at fater tai. Er bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn canmol yn haeddiannol y gefnogaeth a gynhyrchir trwy'r grant cymorth tai, nid yw'n blaenoriaethu hyn fel maes. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru'n honni ei bod yn cynyddu ei phwyslais ar y grant cymorth tai. Maen nhw'n dweud hynny, ar y naill law ac eto, mewn termau real, mae wedi cael toriad o 8 y cant. Mae disgwyl i'r cyllid aros yr un fath â'r llynedd, gyda £166.7 miliwn wedi'i ddyrannu. Mae hyn yn arbennig o bryderus, gan fod y grant yn ceisio helpu pobl fregus gyda phroblemau maen nhw'n eu hwynebu, a gallwn ni weld eu bod nhw nawr yn gwaethygu'r risg o ddigartrefedd. Gallwn hefyd weld risg o drais yn erbyn menywod, cam-drin domestig a thrais rhywiol. Gan symud ymlaen at gyllid diogelwch adeiladau: mae hynny ar fin derbyn gostyngiad o 37 y cant mewn adnodd o'r gyllideb ddangosol, er gwaethaf y gyllideb ddangosol yn neilltuo £9.5 miliwn ar gyfer 2023-24. Mae'r gyllideb ddrafft hon bellach yn dangos bod dyraniad wedi gostwng i £6 miliwn. Mae'n gwneud honiad Llywodraeth Cymru bod diogelwch adeiladau'n brif flaenoriaeth yn destun gwawd. Os mai dyna un o'ch prif flaenoriaethau, wel, fyddwn i ddim yn hoffi gweld unrhyw beth arall yn is ar y rhestr honno. Gyda 261 o ddatganiadau o ddiddordeb wedi eu derbyn ar gyfer cronfa diogelwch adeiladau Cymru, a 163 o'r rheiny angen arolygon dwys, mae maint y risg o dân yng Nghymru yn glir. Er bod angen y £135 miliwn mewn cyfalaf ar gyfer diogelwch adeiladau, rhaid i Lywodraeth Cymru gyfateb ei geiriau a thrin diogelwch adeiladau fel un o'ch prif flaenoriaethau. Mae ond yn deg bod gan ein hetholwyr le diogel i fyw. Mae hyn, wrth gwrs, gweithredoedd Llywodraeth Cymru, bellach yn sefyll mewn cyferbyniad llwyr ag wltimatwm newydd caled Llywodraeth y DU ar gladin, gan roi terfynau amser caled i ddatblygwyr dalu i drwsio adeiladau anniogel. Bydd y farchnad cynllun grant tai gwag cenedlaethol ond yn dod â 2,000 o dai gwag yn ôl i ddefnydd. Gyda 22,140 o eiddo gwag tymor hir yng Nghymru, mae hyn - wel, mae'n ffigwr nad yw'n realistig. Nid oes uchelgais, nid oes dyhead i gael y cartrefi gwag hynny yn ôl i ddefnydd gan bobl sydd wir eu hangen.