English: Thank you for those remarks. I completely agree that more action is needed and I believe I set that out, and I agree that we need to discuss this in far more detail. I don't think today is the time to do that. I think Janet Finch-Saunders set out a series of fair and reasonable challenges and, as she said, rhetoric must be matched by bold and decisive action. And I would say to her, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. That is true for her and her party just as it is for ours, and standing up and calling for us to build six-lane motorways through protected wetlands does not correlate with that challenge she poses to me. So, I think we all have to reflect on what the impact this science has on many of the policy positions we've held until now, and together try and find a way that matches our rhetoric with what the science tells us we need to do. I would just say briefly to close that more than half of what we need to do falls in areas that are not reserved to the Senedd and to the Welsh Government. The UK Government has a significant role to play to make some of the macro changes, and we need to work closely and carefully with them. At the moment, we do see the world in a slightly different way. Their enormous road building programme, for example, is not consistent with the science. It's not a policy that we shall be following, but we do all of us need to be putting the rhetoric to one side and carefully studying the science, and thinking through its implications for policy. And I look forward to working together to try and reach as much consensus as we can.
Welsh: Diolch ichi am y sylwadau hynny. Cytunaf yn llwyr fod angen gweithredu pellach a chredaf imi nodi hynny, a chytunaf fod angen inni drafod hyn yn fanylach o lawer. Nid wyf yn meddwl mai heddiw yw'r amser i wneud hynny. Credaf fod Janet Finch-Saunders wedi cyflwyno cyfres o heriau teg a rhesymol ac fel y dywedodd, rhaid cael camau beiddgar a phendant i fynd gyda'r rhethreg. A byddwn i'n dweud wrthi fod yr hyn sy'n iawn i'r ŵydd yn iawn i'r ceiliagrwydd. Mae hynny'n wir iddi hi a'i phlaid yn union fel y mae i ni, ac nid yw codi i alw am adeiladu traffyrdd chwe lôn drwy wlyptiroedd gwarchodedig yn gydnaws â'r her y mae'n ei rhoi i mi. Felly, rwy'n credu bod yn rhaid i bob un ohonom fyfyrio ar yr effaith y mae'r wyddoniaeth hon yn ei chael ar lawer o'r safbwyntiau polisi rydym wedi'u harddel hyd yma, a chyda'n gilydd rhaid inni geisio dod o hyd i ffordd sy'n cysylltu ein rhethreg â'r hyn y mae'r wyddoniaeth yn dweud wrthym fod angen i ni ei wneud. Byddwn yn dweud yn fyr i gloi bod mwy na hanner yr hyn y mae angen inni ei wneud mewn meysydd nad ydynt wedi'u cadw i'r Senedd ac i Lywodraeth Cymru. Mae gan Lywodraeth y DU rôl bwysig i'w chwarae i wneud rhai o'r newidiadau macro, ac mae angen inni weithio'n agos ac yn ofalus gyda hwy. Ar hyn o bryd, rydym yn gweld y byd mewn ffordd ychydig yn wahanol. Nid yw eu rhaglen adeiladu ffyrdd enfawr, er enghraifft, yn gyson â'r wyddoniaeth. Nid yw'n bolisi y byddwn yn ei ddilyn, ond mae angen i bob un ohonom ymatal rhag rhethreg ac astudio'r wyddoniaeth yn ofalus, a meddwl drwy ei goblygiadau i bolisi. Ac edrychaf ymlaen at gydweithio i geisio cyrraedd cymaint o gonsensws ag y gallwn.