English: I thank the Member for that supplementary question. I referred to a report by the Institute for Government a few weeks ago that describes the challenge in implementing or bringing into law the Bill that is currently in front of the House of Commons in the event that there's no extension sought to the article 50 process. Whatever your view on Brexit, the practical challenges of doing that are absolutely clear, and I repeat the call that the Prime Minister should seek an extension at the earliest possible opportunity. In relation to the practical point that the Member raises about the impact on Wales of a failure to get that primary legislation over the line in Parliament, I would just say, firstly, that the purpose of the legislative deficiencies programme that we've been undertaking for many, many months at this point is in order to ensure that the statute book remains consistent on the first day after Brexit. So, we've been planning on the basis of a 'no deal' from the outset in relation to that. So, the Member's raised previously with me questions around food standards, as she just has done now - chlorinated chicken and that sort of situation. The purpose of the statutory instruments programme we've had in place is to ensure that, as of day one after exit, EU law applies in Wales as the day before, effectively, but it's incorporated into the law of the United Kingdom. So, from that point of view, that has been the objective throughout, but there will be, if it becomes the case that not all that legislation has been passed by the point at which the UK leaves the European Union, there will need to be a rapid programme of statutory instruments to correct some of those issues in relation to other matters. But the sorts of things that she is asking about in her question have been the sorts of things that the deficiencies programme has been aiming to tackle over the last few months.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn atodol hwnnw. Cyfeiriais at adroddiad gan yr Institute for Government ychydig wythnosau'n ôl sy'n disgrifio'r her o weithredu'r Bil sydd gerbron Tŷ'r Cyffredin ar hyn o bryd os na wneir cais i ymestyn proses erthygl 50. Beth bynnag yw eich barn ar Brexit, mae'r heriau ymarferol sy'n deillio o wneud hynny yn gwbl glir, ac rwy'n ailadrodd yr alwad y dylai'r Prif Weinidog geisio estyniad cyn gynted â phosibl. O ran y pwynt ymarferol y mae'r Aelod yn ei godi mewn perthynas â'r modd y byddai methu cael y maen i'r wal gyda'r ddeddfwriaeth sylfaenol honno yn y Senedd yn effeithio ar Gymru, hoffwn ddweud yn gyntaf mai pwrpas y rhaglen o ddiffygion deddfwriaethol y buom yn ymgymryd â hi ers misoedd lawer ar y pwynt hwn yw sicrhau bod y llyfr statud yn parhau i fod yn gyson ar y diwrnod cyntaf ar ôl Brexit. Felly, rydym wedi bod yn cynllunio ar sail 'dim bargen' o'r cychwyn cyntaf mewn perthynas â hynny. Felly, mae'r Aelod wedi codi cwestiynau ynglŷn â safonau bwyd gyda mi yn y gorffennol, fel y mae newydd ei wneud yn awr - cyw iâr wedi'i glorineiddio a phethau tebyg. Pwrpas y rhaglen offerynnau statudol sydd gennym ar waith yw sicrhau bod cyfraith yr UE yn berthnasol yng Nghymru, o'r diwrnod cyntaf y byddwn yn ymadael â'r DU, yn union fel y diwrnod cynt, i bob pwrpas, ond ei bod wedi'i hymgorffori yng nghyfraith y Deyrnas Unedig. Felly, o'r safbwynt hwnnw, dyna fu'r amcan o'r cychwyn, ond os na fydd yr holl ddeddfwriaeth honno wedi'i phasio erbyn i'r DU adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, bydd angen rhaglen offerynnau statudol chwim i gywiro rhai o'r problemau hynny mewn perthynas â materion eraill. Ond y math o bethau y mae'n holi yn eu cylch yn ei chwestiwn yw'r math o bethau y mae'r rhaglen o ddiffygion deddfwriaethol wedi bod yn ceisio mynd i'r afael â hwy dros yr ychydig fisoedd diwethaf.