English: Okay. If I deal first of all with the legislative consent motion point, again, which I think the Member Jeremy Miles has raised as well. I recall now I didn't actually answer that specifically. I think it depends very much what is in the great repeal Bill. We won't know that until there is much more substance to that. There's a broad range of additional issues, and that, of course, relates to once article 50 has been triggered, and that is the issue of the repatriation of powers and how those may be impacted as well. So, the Supreme Court won't be dealing with those specific points. It will be dealing with the point of principle, and that is: what is the appropriate constitutional mechanism for triggering article 50. You make the point, also, in terms of the role of the Lord Chief Justice in protecting the independence of the judiciary. Of course, as you say, he was one of the three judges. But of course, section 3 of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, makes it very, very clear that the Lord Chancellor and the Ministers of the Crown, and a whole range of others who are associated with, and involved with, the judiciary and the administration of justice, have that as a responsibility. What the Act is doing is establishing a legal pre-eminence of the independence of the judiciary. I think it is going to be predominantly a matter for Parliament, I think, to actually raise issues with regard to the points raised with regard to the Lord Chancellor's role. I don't think it would be appropriate for me to comment further, but I have read out the section, and I have made additional comments about what I think is important about the independence of the judiciary. In terms of what the cost will be, we will be able to provide that information in due course. I don't have that information and, of course, it depends on a number of factors in terms of the amount of work, the number of conferences between now and the fifth, the actual length of trial, and whether there are any cost orders at the end of that particular process. In terms of representation, I will provide in a further statement details of that. Obviously, we will arrange for expert representation in court, and that will be direct intervention and the submission of papers that outline what our specific areas of interest are in the intervention. I will make a further statement to this Assembly. I think that probably covers all the questions that have been raised so far.
Welsh: Iawn. Byddaf yn ymdrin yn gyntaf â'r pwynt am gynnig cydsyniad deddfwriaethol, eto, ac rwy'n credu bod yr Aelod Jeremy Miles wedi codi'r pwynt hwn hefyd. Rwy'n cofio nawr na wnes i, mewn gwirionedd, ateb hwnnw yn benodol. Rwy'n credu ei bod yn dibynnu i raddau helaeth ar yr hyn sydd yn y Bil diddymu mawr. Ni fyddwn yn gwybod hynny hyd nes y ceir llawer mwy o sylwedd i hynny. Mae amrywiaeth eang o faterion ychwanegol, ac mae hynny, wrth gwrs, yn ymwneud a'r cyfnod ar ôl i erthygl 50 gael ei sbarduno, sef y mater o ddychwelyd pwerau a sut y gall hynny gael effaith hefyd. Felly, ni fydd y Goruchaf Lys yn ymdrin â'r pwyntiau penodol hynny. Bydd yn ymdrin â'r pwynt o egwyddor, sef: beth yw'r dull cyfansoddiadol priodol ar gyfer sbarduno erthygl 50. Rydych chi'n gwneud y pwynt, hefyd, o ran swyddogaeth yr Arglwydd Brif Ustus wrth amddiffyn annibyniaeth y farnwriaeth. Wrth gwrs, fel yr ydych yn ei ddweud, roedd yn un o'r tri barnwr. Ond wrth gwrs, mae adran 3 o Ddeddf Diwygio Cyfansoddiadol 2005, yn ei gwneud yn glir iawn, iawn bod yr Arglwydd Ganghellor a Gweinidogion y Goron, ac ystod gyfan o bobl eraill sy'n gysylltiedig â'r farnwriaeth a gweinyddu cyfiawnder, ac sy'n ymwneud â hynny, yn gyfrifol am hynny. Yr hyn y mae'r Ddeddf yn ei wneud yw sefydlu goruchafiaeth gyfreithiol annibyniaeth y farnwriaeth. Rwy'n credu y bydd yn fater i'r Senedd yn bennaf, rwy'n meddwl, mewn gwirionedd, i godi materion o ran y pwyntiau a godwyd yn gysylltiedig â swyddogaeth yr Arglwydd Ganghellor. Nid wyf yn credu y byddai'n briodol i mi wneud sylwadau pellach, ond rwyf wedi darllen yr adran, ac rwyf wedi nodi sylwadau ychwanegol am yr hyn yr wyf yn meddwl sy'n bwysig am annibyniaeth y farnwriaeth. O ran beth fydd y gost, byddwn ni'n gallu darparu'r wybodaeth honno maes o law. Nid oes gennyf yr wybodaeth honno ac, wrth gwrs, mae'n dibynnu ar nifer o ffactorau o ran faint o waith, nifer y cynadleddau rhwng nawr a'r pumed, hyd yr achos, ac a oes unrhyw orchmynion cost ar ddiwedd y broses benodol honno. O ran cynrychiolaeth, byddaf yn darparu manylion hynny mewn datganiad arall. Yn amlwg, byddwn yn trefnu cynrychiolaeth arbenigol yn y llys, a bydd hynny'n ymyriad uniongyrchol a chyflwyno papurau sy'n amlinellu beth yw ein meysydd diddordeb penodol yn yr ymyriad. Byddaf yn gwneud datganiad pellach i'r Cynulliad hwn. Rwy'n credu bod hynny, yn ôl pob tebyg, yn cwmpasu'r holl gwestiynau sydd wedi'u codi hyd yn hyn.