techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: The UK Government has boosted the welfare system by £7.4 billion in 2021, including the temporary £20-a-week uplift in universal credit standard allowance and working tax credit basic element. In common with the Welsh Government, the UK Government is keeping all its coronavirus measures under review as the pandemic position changes. As the Prime Minister reconfirmed last week, extending the universal credit uplift beyond April is being kept under review. The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions has stated: 'As the Government has done throughout this crisis, it will continue to assess how best to support low-income families, which is why we will look at the economic and health context in the new year.' It therefore doesn't have plans to cut universal credit from April. However, given your devolved responsibilities, how do you respond to the calls by the Bevan Foundation, Citizens Advice Cymru and Community Housing Cymru for the Welsh Government to establish a single point of access for benefits and support schemes administered in Wales?
Welsh: Mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi rhoi hwb o £7.4 biliwn i'r system les yn 2021, gan gynnwys y cynnydd dros dro o £20 yr wythnos i lwfans safonol credyd cynhwysol ac elfen sylfaenol credyd treth gwaith. Yn yr un ffordd â Llywodraeth Cymru, mae Llywodraeth y DU yn parhau i adolygu ei holl fesurau coronafeirws wrth i sefyllfa'r pandemig newid. Fel y cadarnhaodd Prif Weinidog y DU unwaith eto yr wythnos diwethaf, mae ymestyn y cynnydd i gredyd cynhwysol y tu hwnt i fis Ebrill yn dal i gael ei adolygu. Mae'r Ysgrifennydd Gwladol dros Waith a Phensiynau wedi datgan: Fel y mae'r Llywodraeth wedi ei wneud drwy gydol yr argyfwng hwn, bydd yn parhau i asesu'r ffordd orau o gynorthwyo teuluoedd incwm isel, a dyna pam y byddwn ni'n edrych ar y cyd-destun economaidd ac iechyd yn y flwyddyn newydd. Nid oes ganddi felly gynlluniau i dorri credyd cynhwysol o fis Ebrill ymlaen. Fodd bynnag, o ystyried eich cyfrifoldebau datganoledig, sut ydych chi'n ymateb i alwadau Sefydliad Bevan, Cyngor ar Bopeth Cymru a Cartrefi Cymunedol Cymru i Lywodraeth Cymru sefydlu un pwynt mynediad ar gyfer cynlluniau budd-daliadau a chymorth a weinyddir yng Nghymru?
English: Well, Llywydd, the Member attempts to be an apologist for the UK Government in this regard; it does him no good at all. Keeping it under review is no good to those families in my constituency who rely on that £20 every week to put food on the table for their children. They don't need a review, Mr Isherwood; they need to know that the money is coming to them. Alun Davies asked me a question earlier, Llywydd, about the nonsense that Conservative politicians are putting around about the £1 billion that the Welsh Government is said to have and that we will use during the rest of this financial year. The Treasury has £25 billion in its coronavirus reserve. Why don't they make their minds up and tell those families who rely on it that that money is coming to them? That's what I'd like to see.
Welsh: Wel, Llywydd, mae'r Aelod yn ceisio bod yn ddiffynnydd ar ran Llywodraeth y DU yn hyn o beth; nid yw'n gwneud dim lles iddo o gwbl. Nid yw parhau i'w adolygu yn dda i ddim i'r teuluoedd hynny yn fy etholaeth i sy'n dibynnu ar yr £20 hwnnw bob wythnos i roi bwyd ar y bwrdd i'w plant. Nid adolygiad sydd ei angen arnyn nhw, Mr Isherwood; maen nhw angen gwybod bod yr arian yn dod iddyn nhw. Gofynnodd Alun Davies gwestiwn i mi yn gynharach, Llywydd, am y lol y mae gwleidyddion Ceidwadol yn ei ledaenu am yr £1 biliwn y dywedir sydd gan Lywodraeth Cymru ac y byddwn yn ei ddefnyddio yn ystod gweddill y flwyddyn ariannol hon. Mae gan y Trysorlys £25 biliwn yn ei gronfa coronafeirws wrth gefn. Pam na wnawn nhw wneud penderfyniad a dweud wrth y teuluoedd hynny sy'n dibynnu arno bod yr arian hwnnw yn dod iddyn nhw? Dyna'r hyn yr hoffwn i ei weld.
English: While I share some of the obvious and genuine anger that the First Minister feels about the way in which the benefit system affects people here in Wales, I'd like to put it to the First Minister that there is something that he could do for some of those families. It's estimated by the Child Poverty Action Group that there are about 70,000 children in Wales whose families are in receipt of universal credit and yet they are not eligible for free school meals in Wales. Can I ask the First Minister today, should the UK Government make the decision to remove the £20 uplift - and like the First Minister, I very much hope that they don't do that and that they provide families with certainty - but if they do that, does the First Minister accept that there is of course something that the Welsh Government could do for those families within its devolved powers, and that is to provide those children and those families with entitlement to free school meals?
Welsh: Er fy mod i'n rhannu rhywfaint o'r dicter amlwg a gwirioneddol y mae'r Prif Weinidog yn ei deimlo am y ffordd y mae'r system fudd-daliadau yn effeithio ar bobl yma yng Nghymru, hoffwn awgrymu i'r Prif Weinidog bod rhywbeth y gallai ei wneud ar ran rhai o'r teuluoedd hynny. Mae'r Grŵp Gweithredu ar Dlodi Plant yn amcangyfrif bod oddeutu 70,000 o blant yng Nghymru y mae eu teuluoedd yn derbyn credyd cynhwysol ac eto nad ydyn nhw'n gymwys i gael prydau ysgol am ddim yng Nghymru. A gaf i ofyn i'r Prif Weinidog heddiw, pe byddai Llywodraeth y DU yn gwneud y penderfyniad i ddiddymu'r cynnydd o £20 - ac fel y Prif Weinidog, rwy'n gobeithio yn fawr na fyddan nhw'n gwneud hynny ac y byddan nhw'n rhoi sicrwydd i deuluoedd - ond os byddan nhw'n gwneud hynny, a yw'r Prif Weinidog yn derbyn bod rhywbeth wrth gwrs y gallai Llywodraeth Cymru ei wneud, ar ran y teuluoedd hynny o fewn ei phwerau datganoledig, sef rhoi hawl i'r plant hynny a'r teuluoedd hynny gael prydau ysgol am ddim?
English: I thank Helen Mary Jones for that question. Of course, it's an important one. She will know that the Welsh Government has led the way in making sure that free school meals are available to current beneficiaries through the school holidays, not now just until the end of 2020, but for the whole of 2021. The policy that the Member advocates is one that would have to be looked at very carefully. I'll give her the costings of it: if we assume that those 70,000 families had one child each, then that would cost us £33 million. If we assume that they had two children each, it would cost us £67 million, and if we thought that they had, on average, three children each, it would cost us £101 million. That is very serious money indeed in the circumstances we find ourselves in, and that money will have to be found from somewhere else, because there is no money sitting around in the Welsh Government doing nothing. So, I think there's a case to be made - of course there is - and I've seen it made by the Child Poverty Action Group and others. But I just have to put it to the Member that it is not a choice between doing that and letting everything else carry on; it is a choice between doing that and stopping something else that is undoubtedly necessary and important to many other Welsh citizens.
Welsh: Diolchaf i Helen Mary Jones am y cwestiwn yna. Wrth gwrs, mae'n un pwysig. Bydd yn gwybod bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi arwain y ffordd o ran gwneud yn siŵr bod prydau ysgol am ddim ar gael i fuddiolwyr presennol trwy gydol gwyliau'r ysgol, nid yn unig tan ddiwedd 2020 bellach, ond ar gyfer 2021 i gyd. Mae'r polisi y mae'r Aelod yn ei argymell yn un y byddai'n rhaid edrych arno yn ofalus iawn. Rhoddaf y costau iddi: os tybiwn fod gan y 70,000 o deuluoedd hynny un plentyn yr un, yna byddai hynny'n costio £33 miliwn i ni. Os tybiwn bod ganddyn nhw ddau o blant yr un, byddai'n costio £67 miliwn i ni, a phe byddem ni'n credu bod ganddyn nhw, ar gyfartaledd, dri phlentyn yr un, byddai'n costio £101 miliwn i ni. Mae hynny'n arian difrifol iawn yn wir o dan yr amgylchiadau yr ydym ni ynddyn nhw, a bydd yn rhaid dod o hyd i'r arian hwnnw o rywle arall, oherwydd nid oes arian yn eistedd o gwmpas yn Llywodraeth Cymru yn gwneud dim. Felly, rwy'n credu bod dadl i'w gwneud - wrth gwrs bod - ac rwyf i wedi ei gweld yn cael ei gwneud gan y Grŵp Gweithredu ar Dlodi Plant ac eraill. Ond mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud wrth yr Aelod nad yw'n ddewis rhwng gwneud hynny a gadael i bopeth arall barhau; mae'n ddewis rhwng gwneud hynny a rhoi terfyn ar rywbeth arall sy'n sicr yn angenrheidiol ac yn bwysig i lawer o ddinasyddion eraill Cymru.
English: Racism in any form has no place in Wales - direct or indirect. A great deal of ground still has to be made up at all levels before sport in Wales fully reflects and celebrates the diversity of our nation.
Welsh: Nid oes unrhyw le i hiliaeth ar unrhyw ffurf yng Nghymru - uniongyrchol nac anuniongyrchol. Mae'n rhaid ennill llawer iawn o dir ar bob lefel o hyd cyn bod chwaraeon yng Nghymru yn adlewyrchu ac yn dathlu amrywiaeth ein gwlad yn llawn.
English: Thank you, First Minister. Over the Christmas period, Dragons Rugby winger Ashton Hewitt was subjected to racial abuse on social media. Sadly, this is not an isolated event, and it was only one in a long line of posts that Ashton has received because he's a black player. It's not just confined to one person or sport. Last year, Ashton used his platform to call out racial abuse and raise awareness of racism. Ashton has praised the support he's had from his club - the Dragons - and the Welsh Rugby Players Association, but he has said: 'It was just important for me to highlight that it does happen in my sport. It's not perfect and it's important that people acknowledge and take action.' Much of the abuse on social media comes from anonymous accounts. While Ashton has said he would like to have a constructive conversation with the person who racially abused him, social media anonymity is a problem with obvious solutions. Many apps and advertising require proof of identification to create an account; similar checks could easily be made on social media platforms. Will the First Minister join me in commending Ashton Hewitt for speaking out about racism in sport, and look at how we can support him and others to put an end to all racism? And will the First Minister use his voice in urging the social media giants to strengthen their regulations around anonymous accounts, so that there's nowhere for people to hide?
Welsh: Diolch, Prif Weinidog. Dros gyfnod y Nadolig, cafodd asgellwr Rygbi'r Dreigiau Ashton Hewitt ei gam-drin yn hiliol ar gyfryngau cymdeithasol. Yn anffodus, nid yw hwn yn ddigwyddiad unigryw, a dim ond un ydoedd mewn cyfres faith o negeseuon y mae Ashton wedi eu cael oherwydd ei fod yn chwaraewr du. Nid yw wedi ei gyfyngu i un person neu gamp yn unig. Y llynedd, defnyddiodd Ashton ei lwyfan i dynnu sylw at gam-drin hiliol a chodi ymwybyddiaeth o hiliaeth. Mae Ashton wedi canmol y gefnogaeth y mae wedi ei chael gan ei glwb - y Dreigiau - a Chymdeithas Chwaraewyr Rygbi Cymru, ond mae wedi dweud: Roedd yn bwysig i mi dynnu sylw at y ffaith ei fod yn digwydd yn fy nghamp i. Nid yw'n berffaith ac mae'n bwysig bod pobl yn cydnabod ac yn gweithredu. Daw llawer o'r cam-drin ar gyfryngau cymdeithasol o gyfrifon dienw. Er bod Ashton wedi dweud yr hoffai gael sgwrs adeiladol gyda'r sawl a'i camdriniodd yn hiliol, mae anhysbysrwydd cyfryngau cymdeithasol yn broblem ag iddi atebion amlwg. Mae llawer o apiau a hysbysebion yn gofyn am brawf adnabod i greu cyfrif; gellid cynnal archwiliadau tebyg yn hawdd ar blatfformau cyfryngau cymdeithasol. A wnaiff y Prif Weinidog ymuno â mi i ganmol Ashton Hewitt am dynnu sylw at hiliaeth mewn chwaraeon, ac edrych ar sut y gallwn ni ei gefnogi ef ac eraill i roi terfyn ar bob math o hiliaeth? Ac a wnaiff y Prif Weinidog ddefnyddio ei lais i annog y cewri cyfryngau cymdeithasol i gryfhau eu rheoliadau ynghylch cyfrifon dienw, fel nad oes unman i bobl guddio?
English: Happy new year, First Minister. The Black Lives Matter protest and incidents like that just raised by Jayne Bryant have encouraged governments at all levels now to look at the inequalities facing BAME people in all aspects of life, and sport has had a particularly high profile due to sportsmen like Sir Lewis Hamilton and all the premiership football teams still taking the knee. Campaigners have made the point, though, that nothing will change unless there is greater representation of BAME people in the higher echelons of sporting organisations. In football, for example, a quarter of Premier League football players are black, however there are only six managers from a BAME background in the professional game, and just one director of football. In 2003, in the National Football League in America, they brought in the Rooney rule to address the under-representation of African American coaches in American football, by which at least one black candidate is on the shortlist for interview when a manager's job becomes vacant. What discussions has the Welsh Government had with sports councils, sports organisations, clubs and national governing bodies to review representation and pathways for black, Asian and minority ethnic people in Wales?
Welsh: Blwyddyn newydd dda, Prif Weinidog. Mae protest Black Lives Matter a digwyddiadau fel yr un y mae Jayne Bryant newydd ei godi wedi annog llywodraethau ar bob lefel bellach i edrych ar yr anghydraddoldebau sy'n wynebu pobl dduon ac Asiaidd a lleiafrifoedd ethnig ym mhob agwedd ar fywyd, a bu gan chwaraeon broffil arbennig o uchel oherwydd mabolgampwyr fel Syr Lewis Hamilton a holl dimau pêl-droed uwch gynghrair Lloegr sy'n dal i fynd i lawr ar un ben-glin. Mae ymgyrchwyr wedi gwneud y pwynt, serch hynny, na fydd dim yn newid oni bai bod mwy o gynrychiolaeth o bobl dduon ac Asiaidd a lleiafrifoedd ethnig yn haenau uwch sefydliadau chwaraeon. Ym myd pêl-droed, er enghraifft, mae chwarter chwaraewyr pêl-droed Uwch Gynghrair Lloegr yn ddu, ond dim ond chwe rheolwr o gefndir pobl dduon ac Asiaidd a lleiafrifoedd ethnig sydd yn y gêm broffesiynol, a dim ond un cyfarwyddwr pêl-droed. Yn 2003, yn y National Football League yn America, cyflwynwyd rheol Rooney ganddyn nhw i fynd i'r afael â thangynrychiolaeth hyfforddwyr Americanaidd-Affricanaidd mewn pêl-droed Americanaidd, lle mae o leiaf un ymgeisydd du ar y rhestr fer ar gyfer cyfweliad pan ddaw swydd rheolwr ar gael. Pa drafodaethau y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi eu cael gyda chynghorau chwaraeon, sefydliadau chwaraeon, clybiau a chyrff llywodraethu cenedlaethol i adolygu cynrychiolaeth a llwybrau ar gyfer pobl dduon ac Asiaidd a lleiafrifoedd ethnig yng Nghymru?
English: I thank Angela Burns for that question, Llywydd. Plans for the roll-out of the AstraZeneca vaccine have been made and are now being activated. These plans will run alongside the existing arrangements for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, of which we continue to receive supplies.
Welsh: Diolchaf i Angela Burns am y cwestiwn yna, Llywydd. Mae cynlluniau ar gyfer cyflwyno brechlyn AstraZeneca wedi eu gwneud ac maen nhw'n cael eu gweithredu erbyn hyn. Bydd y cynlluniau hyn yn rhedeg ochr yn ochr â'r trefniadau presennol ar gyfer brechlyn Pfizer-BioNTech, yr ydym ni'n parhau i dderbyn cyflenwadau ohono.
English: Llywydd, despite our repeated calls, the UK Government continues to make funding announcements at the eleventh hour without any engagement with the devolved Governments and without any immediate clarity on implications for Wales. Confusion surrounding last week's announcement on business support is only the latest example.
Welsh: Llywydd, er gwaethaf ein galwadau niferus, mae Llywodraeth y DU yn parhau i wneud cyhoeddiadau am gyllid ar yr unfed awr ar ddeg heb unrhyw ymgysylltiad â'r Llywodraethau datganoledig a heb unrhyw eglurder ar unwaith ynghylch y goblygiadau i Gymru. Dim ond yr enghraifft ddiweddaraf yw'r dryswch ynghylch cyhoeddiad yr wythnos diwethaf ar gymorth busnes.
English: Thank you for that answer, First Minister. Last week, I was very pleased to read on the Welsh Conservatives' social media accounts that the UK Government was providing £220 million of - and I quote - 'extra funding' to support jobs and businesses in Wales. That would certainly be very welcome and much needed at this time, especially in areas like my constituency of Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney. The announcement was also described by the Welsh Conservatives' economy spokesman, Russell George, as - and again, I quote - 'an additional £227 million'. Then the UK Treasury embarrassingly corrected its own press notice after wrongly claiming that the Chancellor's announcement meant extra or additional money for Wales. I recall that, last July, the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that the whole lack of transparency in Treasury budgets was contributing to the confusion about the financial support being given to devolved Governments, making it more difficult to scrutinise and saying that this was corrosive to public trust. Well, First Minister, I got my calculator out, and that tells me that £227 million multiplied by nil equals nil. So, is my calculator wrong, or have we, in fact, been told one of the most misleading and dishonest statements ever told by the Welsh Tories? And does this not prove that the UK Government should follow the Welsh Government's more transparent approach?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb yna, Prif Weinidog. Yr wythnos diwethaf, roeddwn i'n falch iawn o ddarllen ar gyfrifon cyfryngau cymdeithasol y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig bod Llywodraeth y DU yn darparu £220 miliwn - a dyfynnaf - o 'gyllid ychwanegol' i gefnogi swyddi a busnesau yng Nghymru. Byddai hynny yn sicr i'w groesawu yn fawr ac wir ei angen ar hyn o bryd, yn enwedig mewn ardaloedd fel fy etholaeth i, sef Merthyr Tudful a Rhymni. Disgrifiwyd y cyhoeddiad hefyd gan lefarydd economi y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig, Russell George, fel - ac eto, dyfynnaf - '£227 miliwn yn ychwanegol'. Yna, â chryn gywilydd, cywirodd Trysorlys y DU ei hysbysiad ei hun i'r wasg ar ôl honni yn anghywir bod cyhoeddiad y Canghellor yn golygu arian ychwanegol i Gymru. Rwy'n cofio, fis Gorffennaf diwethaf, i'r Sefydliad Astudiaethau Cyllid rybuddio bod yr holl ddiffyg tryloywder yng nghyllidebau'r Trysorlys yn cyfrannu at y dryswch ynglŷn â'r cymorth ariannol sy'n cael ei roi i Lywodraethau datganoledig, gan ei gwneud yn fwy anodd craffu a dweud bod hyn yn niweidiol i ymddiriedaeth y cyhoedd. Wel, Prif Weinidog, agorais fy nghyfrifiannell, ac mae honno'n dweud wrthyf i fod £227 miliwn wedi'i luosi â dim yn gwneud dim. Felly, a yw fy nghyfrifiannell i yn anghywir, neu a ydym ni, mewn gwirionedd, wedi cael un o'r datganiadau mwyaf camarweiniol ac anonest a wnaed erioed gan Dorïaid Cymru? Ac onid yw hyn yn profi y dylai Llywodraeth y DU ddilyn dull mwy tryloyw Llywodraeth Cymru?
English: The next item is questions to the Counsel General and Minister for European Transition in respect of his law officer responsibilities. And the first question is from Mandy Jones.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf, felly, yw'r cwestiynau i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol a'r Gweinidog Pontio Ewropeaidd yn rhinwedd ei swydd fel swyddog cyfreithiol. Ac mae'r cwestiwn cyntaf gan Mandy Jones.
English: Listing in all north Wales magistrates' courts is now at pre-COVID levels, and all Crown courtrooms in north Wales have been made safe for jury trials. We're seeking assurance from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service that the existing measures are suitable for the current transmissibility of the virus. Providers delivering advice services via the Welsh Government single advice fund have been working to deliver remote access to advice during the pandemic.
Welsh: Mae'r rhestrau ym mhob un o lysoedd ynadon y gogledd bellach yn debyg i'r hyn yr oedden nhw cyn COVID, ac mae pob un o lysoedd barn y Goron yn y gogledd wedi'u gwneud yn ddiogel ar gyfer achosion gyda rheithgor. Rydym yn ceisio sicrwydd gan Wasanaeth Llysoedd a Thribiwnlysoedd Ei Mawrhydi bod y mesurau presennol yn addas o ystyried pa mor drosglwyddadwy yw'r feirws ar hyn o bryd. Mae darparwyr sy'n darparu gwasanaethau cynghori drwy gronfa gynghori sengl Llywodraeth Cymru wedi bod yn gweithio i sicrhau bod modd cael cyngor o bell yn ystod y pandemig.
English: Thank you for that answer, Counsel General. During the course of last year, many reports suggested a huge and growing backlog of cases in both criminal and civil courts, and concerns have been raised that victims of rape and sexual assault, in particular, may be put off carrying on with their cases, as they just want to move on with their lives. What discussions have you had with the Ministry of Justice about this, and what is the position in Wales, please?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb yna, Cwnsler Cyffredinol. Llynedd, awgrymodd llawer o adroddiadau bod rhestr hirfaith a chynyddol o achosion wedi cronni ar gyfer llysoedd troseddol a sifil, a chodwyd pryderon y gallai hyn fod yn peri i bobl sydd wedi dioddef trais rhywiol ac ymosodiadau rhywiol beidio â pharhau â'u hachosion, oherwydd eu bod nhw eisiau symud ymlaen gyda'u bywydau. Pa drafodaethau ydych chi wedi'u cael gyda'r Weinyddiaeth Gyfiawnder ynglŷn â hyn, a beth yw'r sefyllfa yng Nghymru, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: We have had discussions with the Ministry of Justice in relation to appropriate court facilities across Wales for the purposes that the Member has referred to today. There has been a magistrates' court recovery programme, on which the Ministry of Justice position is that that is largely work in terms of building back capacity in all parts of Wales, including in north Wales. And in the Crown courts system, there have been some refurbishment works and repurposing works to courtrooms in order to extend capacity, and, as the Member will be aware, in south Wales in particular, the use of Nightingale courts as well. But the point that the Member makes is very important, in that the impact of COVID can be felt in many different aspects of our society, and obviously in the justice system as well. And I'm pleased that she has highlighted this issue in proceedings today; it's a matter that, as a Government, we continue to make representations to the Ministry of Justice.
Welsh: Rydym ni wedi cael trafodaethau gyda'r Weinyddiaeth Gyfiawnder ynglŷn â chyfleusterau llys priodol ledled Cymru at y dibenion y mae'r Aelod wedi cyfeirio atyn nhw heddiw. Cafwyd rhaglen i ailddechrau defnyddio llysoedd ynadon, a safbwynt y Weinyddiaeth Gyfiawnder yw bod hynny'n gweithio i raddau helaeth i adfer capasiti ym mhob rhan o Gymru, gan gynnwys yn y gogledd. Ac yn system llysoedd y Goron, bu rhywfaint o waith adnewyddu a gwaith addasu at ddibenion gwahanol yn y llysoedd barn er mwyn ehangu capasiti, ac, fel y gŵyr yr Aelod, yn y de yn benodol, y defnydd o lysoedd Nightingale hefyd. Ond mae'r sylw y mae'r Aelod yn ei wneud yn bwysig iawn, gan y gellir teimlo effaith COVID mewn sawl agwedd wahanol ar ein cymdeithas, ac yn amlwg yn y system gyfiawnder hefyd. Ac rwy'n falch ei bod wedi tynnu sylw at y mater hwn yn y trafodion heddiw; mae'n fater yr ydym ni, y Llywodraeth, yn parhau i bwyso ar y Weinyddiaeth Gyfiawnder yn ei gylch.
English: The Welsh Government wrote to the Secretary of State on 16 December 2020 indicating our intention to challenge the Bill, as it was at that point. We have received a response to that letter in the past few days, and we are considering the content of that letter at the moment. The Welsh Government will take all possible steps to protect the Senedd from this outrageous attack on its powers in this Bill.
Welsh: Ysgrifennodd Llywodraeth Cymru at yr Ysgrifennydd Gwladol ar 16 Rhagfyr i ddweud ein bod ni'n bwriadu cynnig sialens gyfreithiol i'r Bil, fel oedd e ar y pryd hwnnw. Rydyn ni wedi cael ymateb i'r llythyr hwnnw yn y dyddiau diwethaf, ac rydyn ni'n cysidro cynnwys y llythyr hynny ar hyn o bryd. Bydd Llywodraeth Cymru'n cymryd pob cam posibl i amddiffyn y Senedd rhag yr ymosodiad ar ei phwerau sydd yn y Mesur hwn.