techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: - but having listened to the arguments, I just wanted to make a short contribution. Look, I've been a Member of this Senedd for 15 years, and over those 15 years I've campaigned for 20 mph zones in some parts of my constituency. We've been successful in securing some of them, and the Minister's quite right: it takes too long to secure them. But it takes too long because of guidance from the Welsh Government. There are things that you can do in order to remove the barriers without having to change the default speed limit in all built-up areas to 20 mph. I've seen the impact that it can have on local communities when there is a speed limit reduction; it can give people confidence to be able to be more active in the way that they travel, and I agree that that's something that we need to try and build in. But I think that there are smarter things that we can do with the resources that the Welsh Government is seeking to apply here in order to introduce this new default speed limit.
Welsh: - ond ar ôl gwrando ar y dadleuon, roeddwn i eisiau gwneud cyfraniad byr. Edrychwch, rwyf wedi bod yn Aelod o'r Senedd hon ers 15 mlynedd, a dros y 15 mlynedd hynny rwyf wedi ymgyrchu dros barthau 20 mya mewn rhai rhannau o fy etholaeth i. Rydym ni wedi llwyddo i sicrhau rhai ohonyn nhw, ac mae'r Gweinidog yn llygad ei lle: mae'n cymryd gormod o amser i'w sicrhau. Ond mae'n cymryd gormod o amser oherwydd canllawiau gan Lywodraeth Cymru. Mae pethau y gallwch chi eu gwneud er mwyn cael gwared ar y rhwystrau heb orfod newid y terfyn cyflymder diofyn ym mhob ardal adeiledig i 20 mya. Rwyf wedi gweld yr effaith y gall ei chael ar gymunedau lleol pan fydd gostyngiad yn y terfyn cyflymder; gall roi hyder i bobl allu bod yn fwy egnïol yn y ffordd y maen nhw'n teithio, ac rwy'n cytuno bod hynny'n rhywbeth y mae angen i ni geisio ei gynnwys. Ond rwy'n credu bod pethau doethach y gallwn ni eu gwneud gyda'r adnoddau y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn ceisio eu defnyddio yma er mwyn cyflwyno'r terfyn cyflymder diofyn newydd hwn.
English: I'll happily take one.
Welsh: Byddaf yn hapus i gymryd un.
English: You'll understand this reference. I was a bit of a doubting Thomas when it came to this policy. I've changed my mind completely. Stopping when you're driving 30 mph - six car lengths; stopping at 20 mph is three car lengths. As a father of a 20-month-old, and you'd know this, with several children of your own - children run. You can hold them as much as you like, but they run, and they run into traffic. It's far safer - it is far safer, Darren - and you'll agree with this: when the limit goes down, people's mentality changes. We saw that with drink driving. In a generation, people's mentality on drink driving changed. [ Interruption.] Seatbelts are another example. We need to change our mentality on speed, because children walk across all pavements in inner city areas, not just in front of schools and hospitals.
Welsh: Byddwch chi'n deall y cyfeiriad hwn. Roeddwn i braidd yn amheus o ran y polisi hwn. Rwyf wedi newid fy meddwl yn llwyr. Stopio pan fyddwch chi'n gyrru 30 mya - chwe hyd car; mae stopio ar 20 mya yn dri hyd car. Fel tad i blentyn 20 mis oed, a byddwch chi'n gwybod hyn, gan fod gennych chi sawl plentyn eich hun - mae plant yn rhedeg. Gallwch chi eu dal nhw gymaint ag y dymunwch chi, ond maen nhw'n rhedeg, ac maen nhw'n rhedeg i draffig. Mae'n llawer mwy diogel - mae'n llawer mwy diogel, Darren - a byddwch chi'n cytuno â hyn: pan fydd y terfyn yn gostwng, mae meddylfryd pobl yn newid. Gwelsom hynny gydag yfed a gyrru. Mewn cenhedlaeth, newidiodd meddylfryd pobl ar yfed a gyrru. [ Torri ar draws.] Mae gwregysau diogelwch yn enghraifft arall. Mae angen i ni newid ein meddylfryd o ran cyflymder, oherwydd bod plant yn cerdded ar bob palmant mewn ardaloedd canol dinas, nid dim ond o flaen ysgolion ac ysbytai.
English: On reading the report, I saw that initially 80 per cent of people were in favour of 20 mph, but last year's consultation indicated that there were mixed results with 47 per cent in favour then. Desktop exceptions became an issue when delivered in reality, following the pilots conducted in Buckley in Flintshire, and officers were not permitted to do local exceptions to remove key arterial routes, as they did not fit the Welsh Government template. I understand there needs to be the national guidance for consistency, but council officers need to have permitted flexibility for local decision making, and I hope, listening to the discussions, that as they are the highway authority that will happen and will override. So, I'm asking the Minister if, following the pilot, whether any changes have been made to the exceptions criteria template that will allow councils to make the local decision rather than the Welsh Government, so that contentious arterial roads like Liverpool Road in Buckley can be made back up to 30 mph. Thank you.
Welsh: Wrth ddarllen yr adroddiad, gwelais fod 80 y cant o bobl o blaid 20 mya i ddechrau, ond dangosodd ymgynghoriad y llynedd fod canlyniadau cymysg gyda 47 y cant o blaid bryd hynny. Daeth eithriadau bwrdd gwaith yn broblem pan gawson nhw eu cyflwyno mewn gwirionedd, yn dilyn y cynlluniau treialu a gynhaliwyd ym Mwcle yn Sir y Fflint, ac ni chaniatawyd i swyddogion wneud eithriadau lleol i ddileu prif lwybrau allweddol, gan nad oedden nhw'n cyd-fynd â thempled Llywodraeth Cymru. Rwy'n deall bod angen y canllawiau cenedlaethol ar gyfer cysondeb, ond mae angen i swyddogion cynghorau fod â hyblygrwydd a ganiateir ar gyfer gwneud penderfyniadau lleol, a gobeithio, wrth wrando ar y trafodaethau, gan mai nhw yw'r awdurdod priffyrdd, y bydd hynny'n digwydd ac y byddan nhw'n diystyru. Felly, rwy'n gofyn i'r Gweinidog a oes unrhyw newidiadau wedi eu gwneud i'r templed meini prawf eithriadau a fydd yn caniatáu i gynghorau wneud y penderfyniad lleol yn hytrach na Llywodraeth Cymru, fel y gellir gwneud prif lwybrau fel Ffordd Lerpwl ym Mwcle yn ôl i fyny i 30 mya.
English: Will you take an intervention? So, as I said earlier, one of the problems with the current system where they can make the change to 20 mph is the length of time that that takes. If you're going to introduce this change - and I urge you not to - but if you are going to introduce this change and you manage to get the votes to do so today, will you assure us that you will have a compact, short timescale process to be able to allow these exceptions, where there may need to be an exception for 30 mph or 40 mph or whatever it might be, in those places where it is appropriate?
Welsh: A wnewch chi dderbyn ymyriad? Felly, fel y dywedais yn gynharach, un o'r problemau gyda'r system bresennol lle gallan nhw wneud y newid i 20 mya yw'r amser y mae hynny'n ei gymryd. Os ydych chi am gyflwyno'r newid hwn - ac rwy'n eich annog i beidio â gwneud hynny - ond os ydych chi am gyflwyno'r newid hwn a'ch bod yn llwyddo i gael y pleidleisiau i wneud hynny heddiw, a wnewch chi ein sicrhau y bydd gennych chi broses gryno, amserlen fer i allu caniatáu'r eithriadau hyn, lle y gallai fod angen eithriad ar gyfer 30 mya neu 40 mya neu beth bynnag y bo, yn y mannau hynny lle mae'n briodol?
English: Indeed, absolutely. So, there will be an exceptions process. The exceptions process - . I have to correct my colleague Carolyn Thomas: the exceptions process is not in the gift of the Welsh Government. The exceptions process has been developed by a group working with us and our local authorities to work out the most efficient way of doing the exceptions process, to take into account what is the evidential base needed, what are the views of the local people and the local councillors, and how that authority can make the ruling without the threat of judicial review and challenge of course - that it has the right evidential base - and so that we don't have wildly differing exceptions criteria across Wales. But in the end, it will be the local authority as the transport authority that makes that process. So, I'm not standing here to make any apology for making roads in Wales safer. Pedestrians are five times more likely to be killed at 30 mph compared to 20 mph, as has been pointed out; 52 per cent of all casualties occurred on 30 mph roads during 2019; and as Mark Isherwood actually pointed out, 2.5 per cent of all roads are 20 mph. Darren, you yourself have been campaigning for years to get that number to come up. This makes us all safer, but it's clearly not a blanket approach. We are the first country in the UK to do this. Go on, Sam.
Welsh: Yn wir, yn sicr. Felly, bydd proses eithriadau. Nid yw'r broses eithriadau - . Mae'n rhaid i mi gywiro fy nghyd-Aelod Carolyn Thomas: nid yw'r broses eithriadau yn eiddo i Lywodraeth Cymru. Datblygwyd y broses eithriadau gan grŵp sy'n gweithio gyda ni a'n hawdurdodau lleol i ganfod y ffordd fwyaf effeithlon o wneud y broses eithriadau, i ystyried beth yw'r sylfaen dystiolaethol sydd ei hangen, beth yw barn y bobl leol a'r cynghorwyr lleol, a sut y gall yr awdurdod hwnnw wneud y dyfarniad heb fygythiad adolygiad barnwrol a her wrth gwrs - bod ganddo'r sylfaen dystiolaethol gywir - ac fel nad oes gennym feini prawf eithriadau gwahanol iawn ledled Cymru. Ond yn y pen draw, yr awdurdod lleol fel yr awdurdod trafnidiaeth sy'n gwneud y broses honno. Felly, nid wyf i'n sefyll yma i ymddiheuro am wneud ffyrdd yng Nghymru yn fwy diogel. Mae cerddwyr bum gwaith yn fwy tebygol o gael eu lladd ar 30 mya o'i gymharu ag 20 mya, fel y nodwyd; digwyddodd 52 y cant o'r holl achosion ar ffyrdd 30 mya yn ystod 2019; ac fel y nododd Mark Isherwood mewn gwirionedd, mae 2.5 y cant o'r holl ffyrdd yn 20 mya. Darren, rydych chi eich hun wedi bod yn ymgyrchu ers blynyddoedd i gynyddu'r nifer hwnnw. Mae hyn yn ein gwneud ni i gyd yn fwy diogel, ond mae'n amlwg nad yw'n ddull cyffredinol. Ni yw'r wlad gyntaf yn y DU i wneud hyn. Ewch chi, Sam.
English: Would you accept, then, the logic you're taking there, if you take it to its logical end, in terms of vastly reduced speed, reduced risks of death and injury, which could certainly be the case, therefore driving at 1 mph should be the default?
Welsh: A fyddech chi'n derbyn, felly, y rhesymeg yr ydych yn ei ddefnyddio yn y fan yna, os ewch chi ag ef i'w ben rhesymegol, o ran cyflymder llawer llai, llai o berygl o farwolaeth ac anaf, a allai fod yn wir yn sicr, y dylai gyrru ar 1 mya fod yn ddiofyn felly?
English: No, because the evidence is, Sam, that for the average journey in Wales, the amount of time it'll take you extra is one minute to save all those lives. It's worth it, isn't it? That's the bottom line. People slow down; you've seen them yourselves. They overtake three cars on a country road and then you end up behind them at the traffic lights. It's really dangerous; they can't see around the corners. I know that you know this. You knew it from your own time in Conwy. Russell.
Welsh: Na, oherwydd y dystiolaeth yw, Sam, ar gyfer y daith gyfartalog yng Nghymru, mai'r amser ychwanegol y bydd yn ei gymryd i chi yw un funud i achub yr holl fywydau hynny. Mae'n werth gwneud hynny, onid yw e? Dyna'r sylfaen. Mae pobl yn arafu; rydych chi wedi ei weld eich hunain. Maen nhw'n goddiweddyd tri char ar ffordd wledig ac yna rydych chi y tu ôl iddyn nhw wrth y goleuadau traffig. Mae'n beryglus iawn; dydyn nhw ddim yn gallu gweld o gwmpas y corneli. Rwy'n gwybod eich bod yn gwybod hyn. Roeddech chi'n gwybod hyn o'ch amser chi yng Nghonwy. Russell.
English: Minister, I had quite a lot of sympathy for the trials that were undertaken, but you mentioned the cost as well, and then justifying the cost. But I had a letter this morning from the Royal College of Nursing that was entitled 'How much is your and your loved ones' lives worth?' And the letter goes on to talk about that if we have more nurses, if we have a higher rate of pay, it will attract more nurses, we'll have more nurses and that will save lives. And it goes on to talk about that every hour, throughout the day, nurses make life-saving decisions. So, there are other areas that we could spend money on that would potentially save many, many lives. Do you not accept that principle?
Welsh: Gweinidog, roedd gen i gryn gydymdeimlad â'r treialon a gynhaliwyd, ond fe wnaethoch chi sôn am y gost hefyd, ac yna cyfiawnhau'r gost. Ond cefais lythyr y bore yma gan y Coleg Nyrsio Brenhinol a'i enw oedd 'Faint yw gwerth eich bywyd chi a'ch anwyliaid?' Ac mae'r llythyr yn mynd ymlaen i ddweud os oes gennym ni fwy o nyrsys, os oes gennym ni gyfradd gyflog uwch, bydd yn denu mwy o nyrsys, bydd gennym ni fwy o nyrsys a bydd hynny'n achub bywydau. Ac mae'n mynd ymlaen i ddweud, bob awr, drwy gydol y dydd, fod nyrsys yn gwneud penderfyniadau sy'n achub bywydau. Felly, mae meysydd eraill y gallem ni wario arian arnyn nhw a fyddai o bosibl yn achub llawer iawn o fywydau. Onid ydych chi'n derbyn yr egwyddor honno?
English: I just wanted to correct the record. There was reference there to the plastic bags. We were not against that. In fact, we proposed the charge for plastic bags.
Welsh: Roeddwn am gywiro'r cofnod. Roedd cyfeiriad yn y fan yna at y bagiau plastig. Doeddem ni ddim yn erbyn hynny. Yn wir, ni wnaeth gynnig y tâl am fagiau plastig.
English: No, I was merely pointing out that Wales went first, and then England followed.
Welsh: Na, dim ond tynnu sylw at y ffaith mai Cymru a aeth gyntaf, ac yna dilynodd Lloegr oeddwn i.
English: No, you said that we resisted.
Welsh: Na, fe wnaethoch chi ddweud ein bod wedi gwrthwynebu.
English: And I was making the point that this will be the case -
Welsh: Ac roeddwn i'n gwneud y pwynt y bydd hyn yn wir -
English: You said that we resisted.
Welsh: Fe wnaethoch chi ddweud ein bod ni wedi gwrthwynebu.
English: No, I didn't. I said that Wales went first, and England followed.
Welsh: Naddo, wnes i ddim. Dywedais i mai Cymru a aeth gyntaf, a Lloegr yn dilyn.
English: You said that we resisted. Check the Record.
Welsh: Fe wnaethoch chi ddweud ein bod ni wedi gwrthwynebu. Gwiriwch y Cofnod.
English: And England followed, and this will happen here. So, Llywydd, I absolutely recommend this motion to the Senedd, and I think it is something that will make the people of Wales safer and very proud of their communities. Diolch.
Welsh: A Lloegr yn dilyn, a bydd hyn yn digwydd yn y fan yma. Felly, Llywydd, rwy'n llwyr argymell y cynnig hwn i'r Senedd, ac rwy'n credu ei fod yn rhywbeth a fydd yn gwneud pobl Cymru'n fwy diogel ac yn falch iawn o'u cymunedau. Diolch.
English: The proposal is to agree the motion. Does any Member object? [ Objection.] Yes. Therefore, we will defer voting under this item until voting time.
Welsh: Y cwestiwn yw: a ddylid derbyn y cynnig? A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? [ Gwrthwynebiad. ] Oes. Felly, byddwn ni'n gohirio'r bleidlais tan y cyfnod pleidleisio.
English: Item 12 is the next item. These are the Plant Health etc. (Fees) (Amendment) (Wales) (EU Exit) (No.2) Regulations 2022. I call on the Minister for Climate Change to move the motion and to speak to these regulations again. Julie James.
Welsh: Eitem 12 yw'r eitem nesaf. Rhain yw'r Rheoliadau Iechyd Planhigion etc. (Ffioedd) (Diwygio) (Cymru) (Ymadael â'r UE) (Rhif 2) 2022. Dwi'n galw ar y Gweinidog Newid Hinsawdd i godi ar ei thraed i gyflwyno'r rheoliadau yma eto. Julie James.
English: The Chair of the Legislation, Justice and Constitution Committee, Huw Irranca-Davies.
Welsh: Cadeirydd y pwyllgor deddfwriaeth, Huw Irranca-Davies.
English: I have no other speakers. The Minister to respond.
Welsh: Nid oes gen i unrhyw siaradwyr eraill. Y Gweinidog i ymateb.
English: Just very briefly, we thank the committee for its work. We didn't provide a response as the committee didn't require one, but just to say that Lesley Griffiths and myself have raised this same issue in many inter-ministerial meetings, and indeed, we've written about the working of the framework agreements along very similar lines. I commend the motion to the Senedd.
Welsh: Yn fyr iawn, rydym yn diolch i'r pwyllgor am ei waith. Ni wnaethom ymateb gan na wnaeth y pwyllgor ofyn am un, ond dim ond i ddweud bod Lesley Griffiths a minnau wedi codi'r un mater mewn llawer o gyfarfodydd rhyng-weinidogol, ac yn wir, rydym ni wedi ysgrifennu am y ffordd y mae'r cytundebau fframwaith yn gweithio mewn modd tebyg iawn. Rwy'n cymeradwyo'r cynnig i'r Senedd.
English: The proposal is to agree the motion. Does any Member object? No. The motion is therefore agreed.
Welsh: Y cwestiwn yw: a ddylid derbyn y cynnig? A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? Nac oes, felly, mae'r cynnig yna o dan eitem 12 wedi'i dderbyn.
English: Item 13 is next, namely the Regulated Services (Service Providers and Responsible Individuals) (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2022. I call on the Deputy Minister for Social Services to move the motion - Julie Morgan.
Welsh: Eitem 13 sydd nesaf, sef y Rheoliadau Gwasanaethau Rheoleiddiedig (Darparwyr Gwasanaethau ac Unigolion Cyfrifol) (Cymru) (Diwygio) 2022. Dwi'n galw ar y Dirprwy Weinidog Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol i wneud y cynnig - Julie Morgan.
English: I have no further speakers, so I take it - .
Welsh: Does gen i ddim cyfranwyr i'r ddadl, felly dwi'n cymryd - .
English: I don't know whether the Minister wants to respond to herself. I'll assume that you don't. I have no further speakers in the debate.
Welsh: Nid wyf yn gwybod a yw'r Gweinidog yn dymuno ymateb iddi hi ei hun. Fe gymeraf yn ganiataol nad ydych chi. Nid oes gen i unrhyw siaradwyr eraill yn y ddadl.
English: Thank you, Deputy Minister. So, the proposal is to agree the motion. Does any Member object? No. Therefore, the motion is agreed in accordance with standing order 12.36.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Dirprwy Weinidog. Felly, y cwestiwn yw: a ddylid derbyn y cynnig? A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? Nac oes, felly mae'r cynnig yna wedi ei dderbyn o dan Reol Sefydlog 12.36.
English: Item 14 is the next item, the Welsh Language Standards (No. 8) Regulations 2022. I call on the Minister for the Welsh language to move the motion. Jeremy Miles.
Welsh: Eitem 14 yw'r eitem nesaf, Rheoliadau Safonau'r Gymraeg (Rhif 8) 2022. Dwi'n galw ar Weinidog y Gymraeg i wneud y cynnig yma. Jeremy Miles.
English: The Minister for the Welsh language to reply.
Welsh: Gweinidog y Gymraeg i ymateb.
English: Thank you, Llywydd. These regulations allow the Welsh Language Commissioner to consider where the bodies are on their language journey before imposing final standards upon them, thereby considering what is reasonable to expect, but also to improve Welsh language services to the public. The main aim is to ensure practical, daily use of the Welsh language in our communities. These bodies have been preparing to be captured under the standards regime for years and are ready to proceed in implementing them. The bodies have collaborated fully with us as we prepare the regulations, and they have a healthy attitude towards the Welsh language. I therefore hope that Members will support these regulations as part of our ambition to increase the daily, practical use of the Welsh language.
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Mae'r rheoliadau yma'n caniatáu i Gomisiynydd y Gymraeg ystyried ble mae'r cyrff ar eu taith iaith cyn gosod safonau terfynol arnyn nhw, hynny yw ystyried beth sy'n resymol i gorff ei wneud ond hefyd herio i wella gwasanaethau Cymraeg i'r cyhoedd. Y nod ar ddiwedd y dydd, y prif nod, yw sicrhau defnydd ymarferol bob dydd o'r Gymraeg yn ein cymunedau ni. Mae'r cyrff yma wedi bod yn paratoi ar gyfer dod o dan y drefn safonau ers rhai blynyddoedd ac yn barod i fwrw ymlaen i'w gweithredu. Mae'r cyrff wedi cydweithredu'n llawn gyda ni wrth inni baratoi'r rheoliadau, ac mae ganddyn nhw agwedd iach tuag at y Gymraeg. Rwy'n gobeithio felly bydd Aelodau'n cefnogi'r rheoliadau hyn fel rhan o'n huchelgais ni i gynyddu defnydd ymarferol bob dydd o'n hiaith.
English: The proposal is to agree the motion. Does any Member object? No, there are no objections, therefore the motion is agreed in accordance with Standing Order 12.36.
Welsh: Y cwestiwn yw: a ddylid derbyn y cynnig? A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? Na, does yna ddim gwrthwynebiad, felly mae'r cynnig wedi ei dderbyn yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 12.36.
English: Item 15 is next, which is the debate on Stage 4 of the Welsh Tax Acts etc. (Power to Modify) Bill. I call on the Minister for finance to move the motion. Rebecca Evans.
Welsh: Eitem 15 sydd nesaf, sef y ddadl ar Gyfnod 4 Bil Deddfau Trethi Cymru etc. (Pŵer i Addasu). Dwi'n galw ar y Gweinidog cyllid i wneud y cynnig. Rebecca Evans.
English: I started this process being open-minded on this legislation, as I always do, recognising there are times when one needs to respond to circumstances when such issues arise, but I have to say that evidence provided to the relevant committees scrutinising the Bill, particularly in Stage 1, from some of the most notable legal figures in Wales outlined a number of elements that caused me concern as regards this Bill.
Welsh: Mi gychwynnais i, fel bob tro, y broses yma yn agored fy meddwl ynglŷn â'r ddeddfwriaeth yma ac yn cydnabod bod yna amgylchiadau weithiau lle mae angen medru ymateb i ddigwyddiadau pan fydd hi'n dod i faterion fel hyn, ond, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mi wnaeth tystiolaeth roddwyd i'r pwyllgorau perthnasol oedd yn craffu ar y Bil yma, yn enwedig yng Nghyfnod 1, gan ffigurau cyfreithiol mwyaf nodedig Cymru amlygu sawl elfen wnaeth beri gofid yn sicr i fi o safbwynt y Bil yma.
English: Sir Paul Silk gave us quite compelling evidence when he said that the Bill, and I quote, 'is an example for me', he says, 'of a more general concern that I have about the way in which the Executive is taking over functions that I think properly belong to the legislature', reflecting some of the comments that we've already heard. The LJC itself in its report reflected on that, and I quote again, 'It isprofoundly disappointing that the second piece of primary legislation introduced by the Welsh Government is an enabling Bill which inherently leaves all significant policy development and implementation to be determined by subordinate legislation. This means that the Senedd and its elected Members will face voting on such matters on an "all or nothing" basis, because subordinate legislation is not subject to line-by-line scrutiny and is not amendable.' Concluding eventually that, 'this approach proposed by the Welsh Government is contrary to established parliamentary practice and principles associated with good law-making.'
Welsh: Rhoddodd Syr Paul Silk dystiolaeth pur gadarn inni pan ddywedodd fod y Bil, a dyfynnaf, 'yn esiampl i mi', dywed 'o bryder mwy cyffredinol sydd gennyf am y ffordd y mae'r Weithrediaeth yn ymgymryd â swyddogaethau sydd, yn fy marn i, yn perthyn yn briodol i'r ddeddfwrfa', gan adlewyrchu rhai o'r sylwadau yr ydym ni eisoes wedi'u clywed. Roedd y Pwyllgor Deddfwriaeth, Cyfiawnder a'r Cyfansoddiad ei hun yn ei adroddiad yn myfyrio ar hynny, a dyfynnaf eto, 'Mae'n hynod siomedig bod yr ail ddarn o ddeddfwriaeth sylfaenol a gyflwynir gan Lywodraeth Cymru yn Fil galluogi sydd, yn ei hanfod, yn gadael i'r holl waith datblygu a gweithredu polisi sylweddol gael ei benderfynu gan is-ddeddfwriaeth. Mae hyn yn golygu y bydd y Senedd a'i Haelodau etholedig yn wynebu pleidleisio ar faterion o'r fath ar sail "popeth neu ddim", oherwydd nid yw is-ddeddfwriaeth yn destun craffu llinell wrth linell ac ni ellir ei diwygio. Gan ddod i'r casgliad yn y pen draw, 'mae'r dull hwn a gynigir gan Lywodraeth Cymru yn groes i arferion ac egwyddorion seneddol sefydledig sy'n gysylltiedig â deddfu da.'
English: Yes I will, if the Llywydd will allow me more time.
Welsh: Gwnaf, os gwnaiff y Llywydd ganiatáu mwy o amser imi.