English: I'll deal with your final two points first, because in terms of whether other data issues exist, there is regular scrutiny of reported statistics by our official statistics department within the Government, and they are absolutely scrupulous in the work that they do. And where there are any caveats to data that is received, they're published as part of the statistics report. I'm sure that you and colleagues who do scrutinise those reports when they're provided will note that those caveats are occasionally provided. It's also part of the reason, because we want official statistics for the public to be able to rely upon, that we've not been able to make progress in a number of other areas, because we want to be clear that the data is reliable. I'm under pressure in a number of other areas to make official statistics available, and I've held the line about saying they'll be available when we are certain that we're measuring the same things in the same way across the country, and that is exactly what I expect here. Actually, what happened here was that the health board themselves asked the NHS delivery unit to validate their waiting lists. That review resulted in these people being properly added to the list. So, the health board themselves said, 'We think we may have a problem, get an external body through the Welsh Government to come in and do so.' And more than that, the delivery unit's report is available on the health board's website, so the level of transparency is there now. They've recognised that this was an issue and it's been dealt with. I don't believe there is a need for a further comprehensive review into the organisation. As you know, the status of the whole organisation has been raised to targeted intervention. If there are any further steps that are required, I will report back openly and transparently, together with advice that I'll receive from the NHS Wales chief executive, the Wales Audit Office and, of course, Healthcare Inspectorate Wales.
Welsh: Rwyf am ymdrin â'ch dau bwynt olaf yn gyntaf, oherwydd o ran y cwestiwn a oes problemau eraill yn bodoli gyda data, mae'r ystadegau a gofnodir yn cael eu harchwilio'n rheolaidd gan ein hadran ystadegau swyddogol o fewn y Llywodraeth, ac maent yn gwbl gydwybodol yn y gwaith a wnânt. A lle ceir unrhyw gafeatau i'r data a dderbynnir, cânt eu cyhoeddi fel rhan o'r adroddiad ystadegau. Rwy'n siŵr y byddwch chi a chymheiriaid sy'n craffu ar yr adroddiadau hynny pan gânt eu darparu yn nodi bod y cafeatau hynny'n cael eu darparu o bryd i'w gilydd. Hefyd, oherwydd ein bod eisiau ystadegau swyddogol i'r cyhoedd allu dibynnu arnynt, mae'n rhan o'r rheswm pam nad ydym wedi gallu gwneud cynnydd mewn nifer o feysydd eraill, oherwydd rydym eisiau bod yn glir bod y data yn ddibynadwy. Rwyf dan bwysau mewn nifer o feysydd eraill i sicrhau bod ystadegau swyddogol ar gael, ac rwyf wedi cadw dweud y byddant ar gael pan fyddwn yn sicr ein bod yn mesur yr un pethau yn yr un ffordd ar draws y wlad, a dyna'n union rwy'n ei ddisgwyl yma. Mewn gwirionedd, yr hyn a ddigwyddodd yma oedd bod y bwrdd iechyd eu hunain wedi gofyn i uned gyflawni'r GIG ddilysu eu rhestrau aros. Arweiniodd yr adolygiad hwnnw at ychwanegu'r bobl hyn at y rhestr yn briodol. Felly, dywedodd y bwrdd iechyd ei hun, 'Rydym yn credu y gallai fod gennym broblem, gadewch i ni gael corff allanol drwy Lywodraeth Cymru i ddod i mewn a gwneud hynny.' Ac yn fwy na hynny, mae adroddiad yr uned gyflawni ar gael ar wefan y bwrdd iechyd, felly mae'r lefel honno o dryloywder yno nawr. Maent wedi cydnabod bod hon yn broblem ac mae wedi cael ei datrys. Nid wyf yn credu bod angen adolygiad cynhwysfawr pellach o'r sefydliad. Fel y gwyddoch, mae statws y sefydliad cyfan wedi'i godi i ymyriad wedi'i dargedu. Os oes angen cymryd unrhyw gamau pellach, byddaf yn adrodd yn ôl yn agored ac yn dryloyw, gyda chyngor y byddaf yn ei gael gan brif weithredwr GIG Cymru, Swyddfa Archwilio Cymru, ac Arolygiaeth Gofal Iechyd Cymru wrth gwrs.