English: Can I thank the Member for his comments and questions, and thank him, again, for chairing the committee's inquiry into the new franchise? It was an excellent piece of work, a very thorough and comprehensive report. I'm looking forward to responding to it in full. Meanwhile, I think it's fair to say that the recommendations are very much in tune with the Welsh Government's aspirations for a better, more integrated rail service, one that's integrated well with bus travel and active travel. I should say at the outset that, in order to ensure that there is fair and open competition, and to protect the integrity of the procurement process, it's not always going to be possible to release or comment on specific details on the procurement, as to do so would put Welsh Government at risk of legal challenge. Now, the Member raises the important question of the draft specification and final specification - immensely complicated pieces of work, incredibly complex, and we need to secure the best value for taxpayers and the best possible outcomes in a competitive process. For that reason, there is a need to balance transparency of the process with best value and the best outcomes. So, whilst we will not be publishing the specification, and whilst our competitive dialogue approach is distinctly different to many that are being adopted in other areas, as I said in my statement I will be publishing a summary of the Welsh Government's requirements for the next Wales and borders rail service and for the metro as well. In terms of the rolling stock, I was pleased to be able to announce additional rolling stock. The details of the exact roll-out of each component will be presented in due course to Members, but it will be utilised in a way that enables other parts of the rolling stock catalogue to be adapted accordingly for people with limited mobility. And in terms of the additional capacity, that will be rolled out wherever current capacity is stretched. It will therefore be used on a demand-led basis.
Welsh: A gaf i ddiolch i'r Aelod am ei sylwadau a'i gwestiynau, a diolch iddo, unwaith eto, am gadeirio ymchwiliad y pwyllgor i'r fasnachfraint newydd? Roedd yn ddarn rhagorol o waith, yn adroddiad trylwyr a chynhwysfawr iawn. Rwy'n edrych ymlaen at ymateb iddo yn llawn. Yn y cyfamser, rwy'n meddwl ei bod yn deg dweud bod yr argymhellion yn sicr yn cyd-fynd â dyheadau Llywodraeth Cymru ar gyfer gwasanaeth rheilffyrdd gwell a mwy integredig, un sy'n integreiddio'n dda â theithio bws a theithio llesol. Dylwn ddweud ar y dechrau, er mwyn sicrhau cystadleuaeth deg ac agored, ac i ddiogelu uniondeb y broses gaffael, na fydd bob amser yn bosibl rhyddhau manylion penodol am gaffael neu wneud sylwadau amdanynt, oherwydd byddai gwneud hynny'n rhoi Llywodraeth Cymru mewn perygl o her gyfreithiol. Nawr, mae'r Aelod yn gofyn cwestiwn pwysig am y fanyleb ddrafft a'r fanyleb derfynol - darnau cymhleth dros ben o waith, anhygoel o gymhleth, ac mae angen inni sicrhau'r gwerth gorau i drethdalwyr a'r canlyniadau gorau posibl mewn proses gystadleuol. Am y rheswm hwnnw, mae angen cydbwyso tryloywder y broses â'r gwerth gorau a'r canlyniadau gorau. Felly, er na fyddwn yn cyhoeddi'r fanyleb, ac er bod ein dull deialog gystadleuol yn wahanol iawn i lawer sy'n cael eu mabwysiadu mewn ardaloedd eraill, fel y dywedais yn fy natganiad byddaf yn cyhoeddi crynodeb o ofynion Llywodraeth Cymru ar gyfer gwasanaeth rheilffyrdd nesaf Cymru a'r gororau ac ar gyfer y metro hefyd. O ran y cerbydau, roeddwn yn falch o allu cyhoeddi cerbydau ychwanegol. Caiff manylion yr union broses o gyflwyno pob cydran eu cyflwyno maes o law i Aelodau, ond fe'u defnyddir mewn ffordd sy'n ein galluogi i addasu rhannau eraill o'r catalog cerbydau'n briodol i bobl sydd ag anawsterau symud. Ac o ran y capasiti ychwanegol, cyflwynir hynny lle bynnag y bydd y capasiti presennol wedi'i ymestyn. Caiff ei ddefnyddio, felly, ar sail ymateb i'r galw.