techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you. I agree entirely with Councillor Price, the work on monitoring and accountability is very important indeed for councils, and some of the legislative steps that could be considered, perhaps, is that there should be an annual report submitted to every authority cabinet in terms of progress against the WESP. That's a matter of good practice at the moment, not a requirement, and that would be something that could enhance accountability on services and so on, but would certainly provide that public transparency of taking that report before cabinet. But that role, in terms of accountability, sits with our regulators, with Estyn. But one of the things that could be considered, within the remit of Estyn, is that the WESPs and the monitoring of the WESPs should happen annually, or every two years, through external regulators. Of course, they are included within local authoriity reports when Estyn do visit, but that, at the moment, is a five-to-six-year cycle. So, do we need something more regular and more refined from a regulator, be that Estyn or somebody else, and that's an issue for consideration, I think, in terms of transparency and accountability.
Welsh: Diolch. Dwi'n cytuno'n llwyr gyda Chynghorydd Price yn fanna, mae'r darn ynglŷn â'r monitro a'r atebolrwydd yna ar gynghorau yn hynod o bwysig, ac efallai rhai o'r pethau deddfwriaethol gellid eu hystyried, er enghraifft, yw bod yna adroddiad blynyddol yn mynd i gabinet pob cyngor sir yn ymwneud â chynnydd yn erbyn y CSCAau. Opsiwn neu arfer dda yw hynny ar hyn o bryd, nid yn rheidrwydd, ac mi fyddai hwnna'n rhywbeth o ran dwyn atebolrwydd ar wasanaethau ac yn y blaen, ond yn sicrhau'r tryloywder cyhoeddus yna o fynd â nhw gerbron y cabinet. Ond mae'r rôl honno, o ran atebolrwydd, mae e gyda'n rheoleiddwyr ni, wrth gwrs, ac mae e gydag Estyn. Ond un peth efallai gellid ei ystyried o fewn cylch gorchwyl Estyn yw bod y CSCAau a'r monitro o'r rheini yn digwydd yn flynyddol, neu bob dwy flynedd, drwy reoleiddwyr allanol. Maen nhw, wrth gwrs, yn cael eu cynnwys oddi fewn i adroddiadau awdurdodau lleol, pan fo Estyn yn ymweld, ond hynny, wrth gwrs, yn gylch, ar hyn o bryd, bob ryw bump i chwe blynedd. Felly, a oes angen rhywbeth mwy cyson, mwy miniog, oddi ar reoleiddwyr, boed nhw'n Estyn neu rywun arall, yn fater i'w ystyried, dwi'n credu, o ran tryloywder ac atebolrwydd.
English: I think perhaps that Alun wanted to come in on this.
Welsh: Dwi'n meddwl efallai roedd Alun eisiau dod i mewn ar hyn.
English: Yes. I'm following Heledd, really, because many witnesses that we've heard say that they don't have much confidence that local government can deliver on a national level and that there's a need for more legislation to make it a requirement that the Welsh Government monitors you. Because, at the end of the day, there is variation - and you will have discussed that and you'd expect it in a country like Wales - and it doesn't reflect the variation across Wales, but reflects the failure of councils in Wales.
Welsh: Ie. Dwi'n dilyn trywydd Heledd, actually, achos mae lot fawr o'r tystion dŷn ni wedi'u clywed yn dweud does dim lot o hyder gyda nhw bod llywodraeth leol yn gallu delifro hyn ar lefel genedlaethol, a bod angen mwy o ddeddfwriaeth i fynnu bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn eich monitro chi. Achos, ar ddiwedd y dydd, mae amrywiaeth - mi fuasech chi wedi'i drafod ac mi fuasech chi wedi disgwyl, mewn gwlad fel Cymru, a dydy e ddim yn adlewyrchu amrwyiaeth Cymru, ond yn adlewyrchu methiant cynghorau yng Nghymru.
English: Just on that point, I think the point that Alun Davies raises is a valid one - what happens if we don't reach the target? But, of course, the context is that the political process has been central to this, and councils have agreed on the content, and have agreed that the targets, as I mentioned earlier, are reasonable and ones that can be achieved. I can speak on a personal level - there is a desire and the political will to go further than the target in Carmarthenshire. But the basic question is - and this is relevant to every policy area of Welsh Government - if we find that a council doesn't reach the target, what can the Welsh Government do in reality? We've heard over the last few years about a council perhaps failing with recycling targets for example. Okay, that is statutory, but what is the punishment? That is the reality of the situation, I think; in terms of the powers of the Government, there is a limit perhaps to what a Government can do if that comes to fruition. But I do think that there is a desire now, across local government in Wales, to address this agenda and to deliver, and to help Welsh Government to deliver the target of a million Welsh speakers.
Welsh: Jest ar y pwynt yna, dwi'n credu bod y pwynt mae Alun Davies yn ei godi yn un dilys, onid yw e - beth sy'n digwydd os nad ŷn ni'n cyrraedd y targed? Ond, wrth gwrs, y cyd-destun yw bod y broses wleidyddol wedi bod yn ganolog i hyn. Mae cynghorau sir wedi cytuno ar y cynnwys, ac wedi cytuno bod y targedau yn rhai, fel rôn i'n sôn yn gynt, sy'n rhesymol, ac yn rhai sy'n gallu cael eu cyrraedd. Gallaf siarad ar lefel bersonol, wrth gwrs - mae yna awydd ar lefel wleidyddol i fynd ymhellach na'r targed yn sir Gâr. Ond y cwestiwn sylfaenol yw - ac mae hyn yn berthnasol i bob maes polisi gyda Llywodraeth Cymru - os ŷn ni'n ffeindio bod ambell i gyngor ddim cweit yn cyrraedd y targed, beth all Llywodraeth Cymru ei wneud mewn realiti? Rŷn ni wedi clywed dros y blynyddoedd diwethaf ambell i gyngor efallai yn methu gyda thargedau ailgylchu, er enghraifft. Ocê, mae hwnna'n statudol, ond beth yw'r gosb, fel petai? A dyna realiti y sefyllfa, rwy'n credu; o ran grymoedd y Llywodraeth, mae limit efallai i beth mae'r Llywodraeth yn gallu ei wneud os yw hynny yn dwyn ffrwyth. Ond dwi wir yn credu bod yna awydd nawr ar draws llywodraeth leol yng Nghymru i fynd i'r afael â'r agenda yma ac i ddelifro, ac i helpu Llywodraeth Cymru i ddelifro yn erbyn y targed miliwn o siaradwyr Cymraeg.
English: Thank you very much. I think that final point is an important one in terms of looking at what is already on a statutory basis. Do you think that there are measures that could be adopted to improve or amend the current framework - not just legislative or policy - that would be of benefit?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Dwi'n meddwl bod y pwynt olaf yna yn bwysig o ran edrych ar beth sy'n statudol yn barod. Ydych chi'n meddwl bod yna fesurau y gellid eu defnyddio i wella neu ddiwygio'r fframwaith bresennol - nid jest yn rhai deddfwriaethol neu'n rhai polisi - a fyddai o fudd?
English: This expands on a point that I previously made on funding sources following very closely the various ambitions of the WESPs and their local auhtorities. We do have some fair few grant sources supporting the Welsh language, and many of those go to different places, some go directly to schools, some to authorities, and some to the regions. It would be, perhaps, an interesting piece of work to look at that flow of grant funding and how to ensure that - . Grant funding, along with goodwill, is the way of getting the WESPs implemented. If we are serious about moving schools through these categories, then there's a very real cost of moving a school from category 1 through into T2 and then to 2. They are costs that we are factoring into our budgets at the moment. They are real costs, they are revenue costs, and they are costs over a period of time. So, how do we align the resources that we have in terms of grants in one place, so that those grants can be a real driver to meet the targets of the WESPs?
Welsh: Mae hyn yn ymhelaethu ar rywbeth rŷn ni wedi codi eisoes ynglŷn â ffynonellau cyllidol yn dilyn yn dynn iawn uchelgeisiau gwahanol CSCAau a'u hawdurdodau. Hynny yw, mae gyda ni gryn dipyn o ffynonellau grantiau gwahanol yn cefnogi'r Gymraeg. Mae nifer o'r rheini yn mynd, efallai, i wahanol lefydd: rhai yn mynd yn uniongyrchol i ysgolion, rhai i awdurdodau, rhai i ranbarthau. Mi fyddai fe, dwi'n siwr, efallai, yn ddarn diddorol o waith i edrych ar y llif grantiau yna, a sut rŷn ni'n sicrhau bod y llif grantiau - . Llif grantiau, mewn gwirionedd, ynghyd ag ewyllys, yw'r ffordd o gael y CSCAau i gael eu gweithredu. Er enghraifft, os rŷn ni o ddifri ynglŷn â symud ysgolion ar hyd y categorïau yma, mae yna gost real o symud ysgol o gategori 1 drwy T2 mewn i 2. Maen nhw'n gostau rŷn ni'n ffactora i mewn i'n cyllidebau ni ar hyn o bryd. Maen nhw'n gostau real, maen nhw'n gostau refeniw, ac maen nhw'n gostau dros gyfnod o amser. Felly, ble rŷn ni'n alinio yr adnoddau sydd gyda ni o ran grantiau efallai mewn un man, fel bod y grantiau yma yn gerbyd gwirioneddol fel ffynhonnell i gwrdd â thargedau'r CSCAau?
English: I think that point is a very valid one. As we mentioned in the written evidence, there is a need to focus the financial support on those transitional schools in categories T2 and T3. It ties in with the point made by Alun Davies, that perhaps rewarding councils who are on that journey is a good way of doing so, rather than thinking of the penalty. Because the reality is, I don't think there's much in the Welsh Government's tool box regarding penalties, but, I think, looking at it from another perspective is the best way, and working and collaborating with councils, and rewarding councils that are ambitious in looking to move schools across the continuum.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu bod y pwynt yna yn un dilys iawn. Fel rŷn ni'n sôn yn y dystiolaeth ysgrifenedig, mae yna angen i ffocysu'r gefnogaeth ariannol ar yr ysgolion trosiannol yna yng nghategorïau T2 a T3. Mae'n clymu gyda phwynt Alun Davies, wrth gwrs. Efallai bod gwobrwyo cynghorau sydd ar y daith yna yn ffordd dda o wneud hynny, yn hytrach na meddwl am y gosb, efallai. Achos y realiti yw, dwi ddim yn credu bod lot yn tool box Llywodraeth Cymru yn nhermau'r cosbi, ac efallai taw edrych arno fe o'r ochr arall fyddai orau, a chydweithio â chynghorau, a gwobrwyo'r cynghorau hynny sy'n uchelgeisiol wrth edrych i symud ysgolion ar hyd y continiwwum.
English: Certainly, it's not just revenue grants, but also capital grants, and how we align some of these ambitions with capital projects, sustainable school schemes, twenty-first century schools and so on and so forth. For example, that there is a decision in favour of building new schools when those new schools are following or are in a transition.
Welsh: Ac yn sicr, dyw e ddim jest yn grantiau o ran refeniw, ond cyfalaf, a sut rŷn ni, eto, yn alinio rhai o'r uchelgeisiau yma gyda phrosiectau cyfalaf, prosiectau a chynlluniau ysglion cynaliadwy, ysgolion yr unfed ganrif ar hugain ac yn y blaen. Er enghraifft, bod yna bwysoli o blaid adeiladu ysgolion newydd pan mae'r ysgolion newydd hynny yn dilyn neu mewn cyfnodau trosiannol.
English: Thank you. Heledd, was there anything else you wanted to ask? No. You're happy. Thank you very much for that. We'll move on to Hefin David.
Welsh: Diolch. Heledd, a oedd unrhyw beth arall roeddech chi eisiau gofyn? Na, dŷch chi'n hapus. Diolch am hwnna. Gwnawn ni symud at Hefin David.
English: Thank you, Chair. How adequate is the monitoring framework? Is the system sufficiently robust to enable long-term scrutiny of local authorities' progress against targets? And what role is there for Estyn in monitoring delivery of provision?
Welsh: Diolch, Gadeirydd. Pa mor ddigonol yw'r fframwaith monitro? A yw'r system yn ddigon cadarn i alluogi gwaith craffu hirdymor ar gynnydd awdurdodau lleol yn erbyn targedau? A pha rôl sydd i Estyn ei chwarae o ran monitro darpariaeth?
English: Every council will have their own arrangements in terms of scrutiny of these WESPs. As, I think, we've raised previously, perhaps there could be some expectation in terms of the consistency of that scrutiny role. I think scrutiny reports or reports to cabinet could be considered. There is a role for regulators, as I mentioned, regarding Estyn, but I think there's also a role for groups of authorities, and groups of authorities that are linguistically similar, or similar in terms of their ambition, to come together and to jointly scrutinise. That is, that that challenge, in terms of peer challenge, could be part of the system, where we have a group of local authorities that will perhaps have a number of schools in T3, for example, or an aspiration to immerse 100 per cent of their pupils in the foundation phase in Welsh. And to what extent can we move to have that mechanism in place, where some of those authorities, which linguistically are more closely aligned, could jointly plan on certain aspects, but also jointly scrutinise in terms of holding ourselves to account too.
Welsh: Bydd gan bob cyngor sir, dwi'n siwr, eu trefniadaeth eu hunain o ran craffu ar y cynlluniau strategol yma. Fel dwi'n credu rydyn ni wedi codi o'r blaen, efallai byddai yna ryw arweiniad neu ddisgwyliad ynglŷn â chysondeb y rôl graffu honno. Hynny yw, mae adroddiadau cabinet, adroddiadau craffu, rwy'n meddwl, yn rhywbeth i'w hystyried. Mae yna le i reoleiddwyr, fel rôn i'n dweud ynglŷn ag Estyn, ond mae yna le rwy'n credu i grwpiau o awdurdodau, ac efallai grwpiau o awdurdodau sy'n debyg yn ieithyddol, neu yn eu her, neu yn eu huchelgais, i ddod at ei gilydd a chydgraffu, yn ogystal. Hynny yw, bod yr her honno o ran hergymheiriaid mewn yn y system yn ogystal, ble mae gyda ni grwpiau o awdurdodau lleol fydd â, efallai, nifer o ysgolion yn T3, dyweder, neu dyhead i drochi 100 y cant o'u disgyblion yn y cyfnod sylfaen yn y Gymraeg. Ac i ba raddau rŷn ni'n gallu symud i gael y mecanwaith yn ei le, ble mae rhai o'r awdurdodau hynny, sydd yn ieithyddol yn perthyn yn nes i'w gilydd, yn medru cydgynllunio ar ambell i agwedd, ond hefyd cydgraffu o ran dwyn ein hunain yn atebol yn ogystal.
English: Just to add, and to provide an example, the point that Meinir has raised is important. The regional system of the consortia that we have currently doesn't necessarily deliver in terms of helping individual councils on the WESPs journey and the development of the Welsh language. Just to give you an example, in the south-west, in the Partneriaeth consortium, Carmarthenshire is working with Swansea Council and Pembrokeshire. Of course, the context, as I mentioned in the first question, in those three counties is very different. The challenges that we face are very different on this linguistic element. What we are finding is that informal discussions are happening with other councils, such as Ceredigion and Gwynedd and Arfor councils, which are more similar in a linguistic context. We have done that on a joint planning approach and a joint working approach, but perhaps there's scope to strengthen that element of joint working and joint scrutiny, in terms of how we move through the plans and how we reach our aim, or not. That is a point, I think, that we need to discuss with the Welsh Government, in terms of how we formalise that, to ensure that those councils that are similar on a linguistic level and those councils that have similar targets are scrutinised on a joint basis.
Welsh: Jest i ychwanegu, ac efallai rhoi esiampl fanna, mae'r pwynt mae Meinir yn codi yn un pwysig iawn. Dyw system rhanbarthol y consortia sydd gyda ni ar y foment ddim o reidrwydd yn delifro yn nhermau helpu cynghorau unigol ar siwrne'r CSCAau a datblygu'r iaith Gymraeg. Jest i roi esiampl, yn y de orllewin, gyda'r consortiwm Partneriaeth, mae sir Gâr yn cydweithio â Chyngor Abertawe a sir Benfro. Wrth gwrs, mae'r cyd-destun, fel roeddwn i'n sôn yn y cwestiwn cyntaf, yn y tair sir yna yn wahanol iawn. Mae'r heriau rŷm ni'n eu hwynebu yn wahanol iawn ar yr elfen ieithyddol yma. Beth rŷm ni'n ei ffeindio yw bod yna drafodaethau anffurfiol yn digwydd, efallai, gyda chynghorau eraill megis Ceredigion a Gwynedd a chynghorau Arfor, sy'n fwy tebyg yn ieithyddol. Rŷm ni wedi gwneud hynny ar lefel cydgynllunio a chydweithio, ond efallai bod yna sgôp i gryfhau'r elfen o gydweithio yna ynglŷn â'r cydgraffu, ynglŷn â fel rŷm ni'n symud drwy'r cynlluniau ac fel rŷm ni'n cyrraedd ein nod, neu ddim. Mae hwnnw'n bwynt dwi'n credu y mae angen inni ei drafod gyda Llywodraeth Cymru, ynglŷn â fel rŷm ni'n ffurfioli hynny, i sicrhau bod y cynghorau hynny sy'n debyg yn ieithyddol, a'r cynghorau sydd â chynlluniau penodol a thebyg, yn cydgraffu ac yn cydweithio. Diolch.
English: Thank you. To what extent do you belive that the statutory regime for reviewing and revising 10-year WESPs is appropriate, and should it be a requirement for local authorities to undertake a full review of their WESPs after five years?
Welsh: Diolch. I ba raddau yr ystyrir bod y drefn statudol ar gyfer adolygu a diwygio WESPs dros gyfnod o 10 mlynedd yn briodol, ac a ddylai fod yn ofynnol i awdurdodau lleol gynnal adolygiad llawn o'u cynlluniau strategol ar ôl pum mlynedd?
English: We welcome 10-year planning because that is sensible in terms of language. Certainly, there are other things that do change. There are things related to planning, growth areas, that will change and develop over the next 10 years, as well as the results of one census, at least, if not two. So, I would agree entirely with the point about any long-term planning that isn't scrutinised regularly on an annual basis. Then, after five years, perhaps there should be an expectation that there should be - not reform, because there is potential in reform to lower expectations too - but that there should be potential after five years to increase the ambition. Because we have a minimum in place at the moment. In five years, perhaps we could see whether the conditions are in place where we could raise those aspirations, not lower them.
Welsh: Rŷm ni'n croesawu cynllunio dros ddegawd. Mae cynllunio dros ddegawd yn synhwyrol o ran iaith. Yn sicr, mae yna bethau eraill yn newid, onid oes? Mae yna bethau yn ymwneud â chynllunio, ynglŷn â phatrymau twf ac yn y blaen, a fydd efallai yn newid ac yn esblygu yn ystod y 10 mlynedd nesaf, yn ogystal â chanlyniad un cyfrifiad, yn sicr, os nad dau. Felly, byddwn i'n cytuno'n llwyr gyda'r pwynt o ran unrhyw gynllunio hirdymor sydd ddim yn cael sgrwtini cyson blynyddol. Ond wedyn, efallai, rhyw fan ar ôl pum mlynedd, ble mae yna ddisgwyliad nid i ddiwygio - oherwydd mae yna botensial mewn diwygio i ostwng disgwyliad hefyd - ond bod yna unrhyw botensial mewn pum mlynedd i godi'r disgwyliad. Hynny yw, lleiafswm y disgwyliad sydd gyda ni mewn lle nawr. Ymhen pum mlynedd, gweld os ydy'r amodau yn eu lle i godi'r disgwyliad, nid i'w ostwng e.
English: I completely agree. A number of councils have divided the decade into two, as we have done in Carmarthenshire. So, in thinking, for example, about year one, and the Welsh-medium provision, we are talking about moving four schools on the continuum in the first five years and six in the next period of the decade. So, a halfway review, of course, would be essential, I would say, to see where we are on that journey. But I don't think that it's sufficient to say that there'll be a full review after five years. I think these discussions need to be consistent and regular with the Welsh Government. It's positive to see the collaboration between Welsh Government officials and local government in developing these plans. The hope, of course, is that the discussion and the monitoring and the scrutiny continue throughout the period. Thank you.
Welsh: Dwi'n cytuno'n llwyr. Mae rhai o'r cynghorau wedi rhannu'r ddegawd yn ddwy. Dyna'n sicr fel rŷm ni wedi gwneud pethau yn sir Gâr. Felly, wrth feddwl, er enghraifft, ynglŷn â blwyddyn un a'r ddarpariaeth Gymraeg, rŷm ni'n sôn am symud pedair ysgol ar hyd y continwwm yn y bum mlynedd gyntaf, a chwech yn yr ail ran o'r ddegawd. Felly, byddai adolygiad hanner ffordd drwy'r cwrs yn hanfodol, byddwn i'n dweud, i weld ble rŷm ni ar y daith yna. Ond dydw i ddim yn credu ei bod hi'n ddigonol i ddweud bod adolygiad llawn ar ôl pum mlynedd. Mae eisiau bod y trafodaethau yma, fel roeddwn i'n sôn yn gynt, yn barhaol ac yn gyson gyda Llywodraeth Cymru. Mae hi'n bositif i weld y cydweithio rhwng swyddogion Llywodraeth Cymru a llywodraeth leol wrth ddatblygu'r cynlluniau yma. Y gobaith yw, wrth gwrs, y bydd y trafod a'r monitro a'r craffu hynny yn parhau drwy gydol y cyfnod.
English: Thank you. Hefin, are you happy? Great. We'll move on to Tom Giffard.
Welsh: Diolch. Hefin, a ŷch chi'n hapus? Grêt. Mi wnawn ni symud at Tom Giffard.
English: Thank you, Chair. I wanted to mention the English-medium sector and the WESPs. What assessment have you made of the WESPs in the English-medium sector? Are they working, and if they aren't, how can we tackle that for the future?
Welsh: Diolch, Gadeirydd. Roeddwn i am sôn am y sector cyfrwng Saesneg a'r WESPs. Pa asesiad ydych chi wedi'i wneud o'r WESPs yn y cyfrwng Saesneg? A ydyn nhw'n gweithio, ac os nad ydyn nhw'n gweithio, sut ydyn ni'n gallu taclo hynny yn y dyfodol?
English: I assume that that's a reference to how effective the WESPs would be in supporting English-medium schools to move along the continuum.
Welsh: Dwi'n cymryd bod y cyfeiriad yn y fan yna at ba mor effeithiol y byddai'r CSCAau yn cefnogi ysgolion Saesneg i symud ar hyd y continwwm.
English: Are they doing what they are intended to do - the WESPs?
Welsh: A ydyn nhw'n gwneud beth maen nhw i fod i wneud - y WESPs?
English: Thank you, Meinir. Darren, did you want to come in at this point?
Welsh: Diolch, Meinir. Darren, oeddech chi eisiau dod i mewn ar hyn?
English: Darren, just for a minute - . We can't hear you very well. Could you just move closer to the microphone?
Welsh: Darren, jest am funud - . Dŷn ni ddim yn gallu clywed chi'n dda iawn. Ydych chi'n gallu mynd yn agosach at y meicroffon?
English: No problem. Is that better?
Welsh: Dim problem. Ydy hwnna'n well?
English: Can you just - ? We'll just check with the sound technician for a minute. Could you try speaking again?
Welsh: Ydych chi'n gallu - ? Gwnawn ni jest siecio'r sain jest am un funud. Ydych chi'n gallu ceisio siarad eto?
English: Is that better?
Welsh: Ydy hwnna'n well?
English: No. There's something wrong. We'll just - . Do we need to take a break for this? Yes. We'll just take a short break of two minutes just to try and sort this out. We'll go into private session just for a minute or two.
Welsh: Na. Mae rhywbeth yn bod. Gwnawn ni jest - . Ydyn ni angen cymryd egwyl fer jest am hyn? Ie. Gwnawn ni jest gymryd egwyl o ddwy funud jest i geisio sortio hyn mas. Gwnawn ni fynd yn breifat am ddwy funud.
English: Thank you, Darren. Tom.
Welsh: Diolch, Darren. Tom.
English: In the previous session, when we mentioned the English-medium sector and staff, some of the people who gave us evidence mentioned skills - . Well, two things - one was skills and the other was confidence - as problems. They were telling us that not everyone knew what Welsh language skills staff had in English-medium schools. So, does that happen? Do English-medium schools always know who in their school or college can speak Welsh, if they have those skills, in your experience? And then, how can we develop not only the skills but also the confidence among the staff too?
Welsh: Yn y sesiwn diwethaf, pan oedden ni'n sôn am y sector gyfrwng Saesneg, ac roedden ni'n sôn am staff, roedd rhai o'r bobl oedd wedi dod mewn yn dweud am ryw fath o sgiliau - . Wel, roedd dau beth - roedd sgiliau ac roedd hyder - yn broblemau. Roedden nhw'n sôn am sut doedd dim pawb yn gwybod pa sgiliau Cymraeg oedd gan staff yn ysgolion cyfrwng Saesneg. Felly, ydy hynny yn digwydd? Ydy ysgolion Saesneg wastad yn gwybod os yw pawb yn eu hysgol neu eu coleg nhw yn gallu siarad Cymraeg, a oes ganddyn nhw sgiliau Cymraeg, yn eich profiad chi? A hefyd, sut gallwn ni ddatblygu nid dim ond y sgiliau ond yr hyder gan y staff yna hefyd?
English: Thank you, Meinir. Before I bring Darren in, we are into our final 15 minutes. But we have plenty of time left. We'll go to Darren now.
Welsh: Diolch, Meinir. Gyda llaw, cyn i fi ddod â Darren i mewn, rydyn ni i mewn i'n chwarter awr olaf ni nawr. Ond mae digonedd o amser ar ôl. Gwnawn ni fynd at Darren.
English: Thank you, Darren.
Welsh: Diolch, Darren.