English: Thank you, Llywydd. Thank you to the Members who have contributed to the debate. Perhaps it's worth setting out that we have taken unprecedented steps to protect public health from the risk of coronavirus, and even though we have been successful in preventing a much wider and more catastrophic spread of coronavirus, this is still not over and it is certainly not trivial, with more than 1,000 confirmed deaths across Wales. And we know there will be more to come. But the approach we have taken with the rules we have set out and the behaviour of the public has undoubtedly helped to save lives, and I'm tremendously grateful still not just to our front-line staff, but to members of the public who have followed the rules and made a real difference. As we know, the two sets of regulations debated today were introduced under the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984, under emergency procedures. Rather than the criticism made by the Brexit Party, I think it's a good thing that Governments of the United Kingdom, the four Governments, have shared information and then made choices for the country and people that we are responsible for within each of the four respective Governments. I don't accept the out-of-step and, in my view, misguided view from the Brexit Party that we should simply do what England has done, and we're certainly not dealing with an ideological lodestar. We're looking at the purpose and the proportionality of the regulations we have in place and the purpose of them. The principal regulations came into force on 26 March, and those brought in the view about people only leaving home for limited purposes, including essential shopping, exercise once a day, any medical need or to provide care or help to a vulnerable person, and travelling to and from work if necessary. To deal with Angela Burns's point, the police cannot require people to leave homes when they are in residence. It's a matter we're still talking through with both the police and local government about the issue, and I don't want to trivialise it, of people in second homes. That's an issue we still discuss because of the ongoing review of the regulations. But the main purpose of the principal regulations is to minimise the extent to which people leave their homes during this continuing emergency period to help contain coronavirus, to minimise the burden on health services and to save more lives. So, unjustified and unnecessary journeys are prohibited. The amendment regulations that came into force on 7 April made a number of important changes, including the social distancing measures in places of work. And, actually, we've been followed by other parts of the United Kingdom, having introduced those rules. They were made to both protect individual health and minimise the risk of transmission in the workplace. We also made clear in those regulations that businesses can continue to provide services online or by telephone or post. Llywydd, it remains my view and the Government's view that these are sensible restrictions introduced to deal with a national health emergency. This is still a once-in-a-century event, and there will be many more difficult days ahead of us. We are constantly reviewing the requirements and talking to stakeholders to see what amendments need to be made. And, in some areas, that may well mean strengthening or changing legislative requirements, and that may well mean that Wales goes first or in a different direction to other parts of the United Kingdom, because we have to respond to the responsibilities we continue to have, and we cannot contract out of for the people of Wales. In other areas, they may be eased, where it is safe to do so. Now, as Members will be aware, we further amended the principal regulations last Friday, as part of the ongoing review process. Those regulations make a number of revisions, including permitting exercise more than once a day because of a particular health condition or disability, and making it clear that visiting a cemetery or other burial ground to pay respects to a deceased person is a reasonable excuse for leaving where you live. And those amending regulations will come before the Senedd shortly. I just want to deal with some of the challenge about the collective approach that we have, and the central messages remain the same: anyone can get the virus, anyone can spread it, and we do still need to continue to stay at home, protect the NHS and to save lives. I think the tone of some of Mr Reckless's contribution was not as helpful as I would have wished it to be in reinforcing that message, because we are seeing the effects of those measures and are taking the steps needed to help our NHS to cope, to keep essential services running and to protect the most vulnerable, but there's still a long way to go. So, we are reviewing the measures and making changes to respond to the challenges being faced in parts of the country and by families throughout Wales. The regulations implemented in Wales are essential on the basis of the clinical and scientific advice to respond to this situation. The measures are temporary and proportionate to the threat that we face, and they will only be in place for as long as they are required. They're continuously reviewed, with advice on the balance of risk in this public health emergency, and there is a formal 21-day review period looking at the seven tests published by the First Minister last Friday to determine the necessity for the regulations to continue. And in my view, we're in a better position in Wales for having been more open and provided more detail about those tests for the continuance of these regulations, and the possible paths through lockdown. Nobody should expect that the restrictions will end for the bank holiday weekend; they will not. The path out of lockdown will be phased and cautious. So, I ask the Senedd to support these regulations and agree that they are necessary for ensuring the protection of the citizens of Wales we are responsible for. They will, as I've said, be kept under review and removed or amended as soon as it is safe for us to do so.
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Diolch i'r Aelodau sydd wedi cyfrannu at y ddadl. Efallai ei bod yn werth nodi ein bod wedi cymryd camau digynsail i ddiogelu iechyd y cyhoedd rhag perygl coronafeirws, ac er ein bod ni wedi llwyddo i atal lledaeniad llawer ehangach a mwy trychinebus o coronafeirws, nid yw hyn drosodd eto ac yn sicr nid yw'n ddinod, gyda mwy na 1,000 o farwolaethau wedi'u cadarnhau ledled Cymru. A gwyddom y bydd mwy i ddod. Ond mae'r dull a ddilynwyd gennym gyda'r rheolau yr ydym wedi eu llunio ac ymddygiad y cyhoedd yn sicr wedi helpu i achub bywydau, ac rwyf yn hynod ddiolchgar o hyd nid yn unig i'n staff rheng flaen, ond i aelodau o'r cyhoedd sydd wedi dilyn y rheolau ac wedi gwneud gwahaniaeth gwirioneddol. Fel y gwyddom, cyflwynwyd y ddwy gyfres o reoliadau a drafodwyd heddiw o dan Ddeddf Iechyd y Cyhoedd (Rheoli Clefydau) 1984, o dan weithdrefnau argyfwng. Yn hytrach na'r feirniadaeth a wnaed gan Blaid Brexit rwy'n credu ei bod yn beth da bod Llywodraethau'r Deyrnas Unedig, y pedair Llywodraeth, wedi rhannu gwybodaeth ac yna wedi gwneud penderfyniadau ar ran y wlad a'r bobl yr ydym ni'n gyfrifol amdanyn nhw o fewn pob un o'r pedair Llywodraeth unigol. Nid wyf yn derbyn safbwynt gwahanol ac, yn fy marn i, camarweiniol Plaid Brexit y dylem ni wneud yr hyn y mae Lloegr wedi'i wneud, ac yn sicr nid ydym yn ymdrin â mater o egwyddorion ideolegol. Rydyn ni'n edrych ar ddiben a chymesuredd y rheoliadau sydd gennym ni a'u diben. Daeth y prif reoliadau i rym ar 26 Mawrth, a daeth y rheini â'r farn i mewn am bobl ddim ond yn gadael cartref at ddibenion penodol, gan gynnwys siopa hanfodol, ymarfer corff unwaith y dydd, unrhyw angen meddygol neu i ddarparu gofal neu gymorth i berson sy'n agored i niwed, a theithio i'r gwaith ac oddi yno os yw hynny'n angenrheidiol. I ymdrin â phwynt Angela Burns, ni all yr heddlu fynnu bod pobl yn gadael eu cartrefi pan eu bod nhw'n preswylio yno. Mae'n fater yr ydym yn dal i'w drafod â'r heddlu a llywodraeth leol yn ei gylch, ac nid wyf am ei fychanu, am bobl mewn ail gartrefi. Mae hwnnw'n fater yr ydym yn dal i'w drafod oherwydd yr adolygiad parhaus o'r rheoliadau. Ond prif ddiben y prif reoliadau yw lleihau i ba raddau y mae pobl yn gadael eu cartrefi yn ystod y cyfnod argyfwng parhaus hwn i helpu i atal y coronafeirws, er mwyn lleihau'r baich ar wasanaethau iechyd ac achub mwy o fywydau. Felly, gwaherddir siwrneiau diangen a heb gyfiawnhad. Fe wnaeth y rheoliadau diwygio a ddaeth i rym ar 7 Ebrill nifer o newidiadau pwysig, gan gynnwys y mesurau cadw pellter cymdeithasol mewn mannau gwaith. Ac, mewn gwirionedd, rydym ni wedi cael ein dilyn gan rannau eraill o'r Deyrnas Unedig, ar ôl cyflwyno'r rheolau hynny. Fe'u gwnaed i ddiogelu iechyd unigolion a lleihau'r risg o drosglwyddo yn y gweithle. Fe'i gwnaed yn glir hefyd yn y rheoliadau hynny y gall busnesau barhau i ddarparu gwasanaethau ar-lein neu dros y ffôn neu drwy'r post. Llywydd, fy marn i a barn y Llywodraeth o hyd yw bod y rhain yn gyfyngiadau synhwyrol a gyflwynwyd i ymdrin ag argyfwng iechyd cenedlaethol. Digwyddiad unwaith mewn canrif yw hwn o hyd, a bydd llawer mwy o ddyddiau anodd o'n blaenau. Rydym yn adolygu'r gofynion yn gyson ac yn siarad â rhanddeiliaid i weld pa newidiadau y mae angen eu gwneud. Ac, mewn rhai meysydd, mae'n bosibl iawn y bydd hynny'n golygu cryfhau neu newid gofynion deddfwriaethol, ac mae'n ddigon posibl y bydd hynny'n golygu bod Cymru'n mynd gyntaf neu mewn cyfeiriad gwahanol i rannau eraill o'r Deyrnas Unedig, oherwydd mae'n rhaid i ni ymateb i'r cyfrifoldebau sy'n dal i fod gennym, ac ni allwn gontractio allan ohonyn nhw ar ran pobl Cymru. Mewn meysydd eraill, efallai y byddan nhw'n cael eu lliniaru, pan ei bod yn ddiogel i wneud hynny. Nawr, fel y bydd Aelodau yn gwybod, fe wnaethom ddiwygio'r prif reoliadau ymhellach ddydd Gwener diwethaf, yn rhan o'r broses adolygu barhaus. Mae'r rheoliadau hynny yn gwneud nifer o ddiwygiadau, gan gynnwys caniatáu ymarfer corff fwy nag unwaith y dydd oherwydd cyflwr iechyd neu anabledd penodol, ac mae'n amlwg bod ymweld â mynwent neu dir claddu arall i dalu teyrnged i berson sydd wedi marw yn esgus rhesymol dros adael y lle yr ydych yn byw ynddo. A bydd y rheoliadau diwygio hynny yn dod gerbron y Senedd yn fuan iawn. Rwyf eisiau ymdrin â pheth o'r her ynghylch y dull cyfunol sydd gennym, ac mae'r negeseuon canolog yn aros yr un fath: gall unrhyw un gael y firws, gall unrhyw un ei ledaenu, ac mae angen o hyd i ni barhau i aros gartref, amddiffyn y GIG ac achub bywydau. Rwy'n credu nad oedd tôn peth o gyfraniad Mr Reckless mor ddefnyddiol ag y byddwn i wedi dymuno iddo fod wrth atgyfnerthu'r neges honno, oherwydd rydym ni yn gweld effeithiau'r mesurau hynny ac yn cymryd y camau angenrheidiol i helpu ein GIG i ymdopi, i gadw gwasanaethau hanfodol i barhau ac i ddiogelu'r rhai mwyaf agored i niwed, ond mae ffordd bell i fynd eto. Felly, rydym yn adolygu'r mesurau ac yn gwneud newidiadau i ymateb i'r heriau a wynebir mewn rhannau o'r wlad a gan deuluoedd ledled Cymru. Mae'r rheoliadau a weithredir yng Nghymru yn hanfodol ar sail y cyngor clinigol a gwyddonol i ymateb i'r sefyllfa hon. Mae'r mesurau'n rhai dros dro ac yn gymesur â'r bygythiad a wynebwn, a dim ond am gyhyd ag y bydd eu hangen y byddan nhw'n cael eu rhoi ar waith. Maen nhw'n cael eu hadolygu'n barhaus, gyda chyngor ar gydbwysedd y risg yn yr argyfwng iechyd cyhoeddus hwn, ac mae cyfnod adolygu ffurfiol o 21 diwrnod yn edrych ar y saith prawf a gyhoeddwyd gan y Prif Weinidog ddydd Gwener diwethaf i benderfynu ar yr angenrheidrwydd i'r rheoliadau barhau. Ac yn fy marn i, rydym ni mewn gwell sefyllfa yng Nghymru oherwydd ein bod ni wedi bod yn fwy agored ac wedi darparu mwy o fanylion am y profion hynny ar gyfer parhad y rheoliadau hyn, a'r llwybrau posibl drwy'r cyfyngiadau symud. Ni ddylai unrhyw un ddisgwyl y bydd y cyfyngiadau'n dod i ben ar gyfer penwythnos gŵyl y banc; fyddan nhw ddim. Bydd y llwybr allan o'r cyfyngiadau symud yn cael ei gyflwyno'n raddol ac yn bwyllog. Felly, gofynnaf i'r Senedd gefnogi'r rheoliadau hyn a chytuno eu bod yn angenrheidiol i sicrhau diogelwch dinasyddion Cymru yr ydym ni'n gyfrifol amdanyn nhw. Fel y dywedais, byddan nhw'n cael eu hadolygu'n barhaus a'u dileu neu eu diwygio cyn gynted ag y bydd hi'n ddiogel i ni wneud hynny.