English: May I agree with that final point, and endorse Dai Lloyd's comments on the work that is being done across Wales to prepare for this, with the Welsh Government, but also with our partners and the various sectors, in preparation for the end of the transition period, which is just 16 days away? So, Dai Lloyd is right to say that some disruption is inevitable in both scenarios facing us, because of the uncertainties and the new red tape that the Westminster Government has imposed on businesses and exports here in Wales. The Member asked three questions. First of all, what has the role of the Welsh Government been in negotiations? Well, our role has been in common frameworks and in preparing legislation, and preparing for what the outcome will be. But as he knows from discussions we've had in the past, the roles of the devolved Governments haven't been what they should have been in the negotiation process. So, these are the UK Government's negotiations - for better or for worse. The priorities of the people of Wales, expressed through the Welsh Government, haven't been given a proper place in the process of agreeing a position across the Governments of the UK and then having an influence on the negotiations through doing so. There have been elements of influence, but there hasn't been the structure that this Senedd would have expected on behalf of the people of Wales. In terms of the second question, on medicines, arrangements are in place across the UK. It's the role of the UK Government to import medicines from abroad into the UK, but arrangements are in place, in order to ensure that that can happen in the context that he describes, that is to say when medicines can't be stored and they have to be transported urgently. If there was any disruption in ports, then there are systems in place to bring them in by air freight to ensure that they arrive in good time. And arrangements have been agreed with the four Governments, so that there is equal sharing of those across the four nations, with the clinical influence of the chief medical officers being very important in that in ensuring that that distribution happens on an equal basis. And in terms of the final question on a deal, well, I agree with what Dai Lloyd has said that this deal doesn't reflect what we would want to see on behalf of the people of Wales. It doesn't provide sufficient assurances for our economy, our employers and our exporters. But a deal of this kind would be better than no deal. And we do have a possible scenario in the new year, as Dai Lloyd has recognised, that a deal may have been reached but that it hadn't been ratified, or that it's still being negotiated, or it has been negotiated but hasn't been signed off. So, all of those scenarios are possible, and, of course, we are looking at what could happen in those scenarios. As he will know, the arrangements that we have put in place, to date, are on the basis of exiting with no deal. So, we have that worst-case scenario as part of our planning, too.
Welsh: Gaf i gytuno gyda'r pwynt diwethaf yna, i ategu sylwadau Dai Lloyd ynglŷn â'r gwaith sy'n mynd rhagddo ar draws Cymru i baratoi ar gyfer hyn, yn Llywodraeth Cymru, ond gyda'n partneriaid ni hefyd ac mewn sectorau lu, ar gyfer diwedd y cyfnod pontio, sydd ddim ond 16 diwrnod i fynd? Felly, mae Dai Lloyd yn iawn i ddweud bod tarfu o ryw fath yn anochel yn y ddwy senario sydd o'n blaenau ni ar hyn o bryd, oherwydd yr ansicrwydd sydd wedi bod a'r tâp coch newydd y mae Llywodraeth San Steffan yn ei gyflwyno ar fusnesau ac allforion yma yng Nghymru. Fe wnaeth yr Aelod ofyn tri chwestiwn. Yn gyntaf, beth oedd rôl Llywodraeth Cymru yn y negodiadau? Wel, mae rôl gyda ni wedi bod, wrth gwrs, yn y fframweithiau cyffredin, ac yn paratoi'r ddeddfwriaeth, ac yn y broses o baratoi. Ond fel y mae e'n gwybod o'n trafodaethau ni yn y gorffennol, dyw rôl y Llywodraethau datganoledig ddim wedi bod beth y dylai e fod yn y broses o negodi. Felly, negodiadau Llywodraeth San Steffan yw'r rhain - er gwell neu er gwaeth. Mae blaenoriaethau pobl Cymru, trwy Lywodraeth Cymru, ddim wedi cael y lle iawn yn y broses o gytuno safbwynt ar draws Llywodraethau'r Deyrnas Gyfunol, ac wedyn cael dylanwad felly ar y negodiadau. Mae elfennau o ddylanwad wedi bod, ond ddim strwythur y byddai'r Senedd hon yn ei mynnu ar ran pobl Cymru. O ran yr ail gwestiwn, meddyginiaethau, mae trefniadau ar waith ar draws y Deyrnas Unedig. Rôl a phŵer Llywodraeth San Steffan yw mewnforio meddyginiaethau o dramor i Brydain, wrth gwrs, ond mae trefniadau ar waith i sicrhau bod hynny'n gallu digwydd yn y cyd-destun mae e'n disgrifio, hynny yw, pan mae meddyginiaethau ddim yn gallu cael eu storio, bod rhaid iddyn nhw gael eu cludo ar fyrder. Pe buasai tarfu yn y porthladdoedd, mae systemau ar waith i'w hedfan nhw i mewn er mwyn sicrhau eu bod nhw'n gallu cyrraedd mewn da bryd. Mae trefniadau wedi eu cytuno rhwng y pedair Llywodraeth, fel bod rhannu hafal o'r rheini'n digwydd ar draws y pedair cenedl, gyda dylanwad clinigol y chief medical officers yn bwysig yn hynny i sicrhau bod y dosbarthu'n digwydd o safbwynt hafal. Ac yn y cwestiwn diwethaf gwnaeth e ofyn ynglŷn â'r cytundeb ac ati, rwy'n cytuno gyda beth mae Dai Lloyd yn ei ddweud. Dyw'r cytundeb hwn ddim yn adlewyrchu beth fyddem ni moyn gweld ar ran pobl Cymru. Dyw e ddim yn rhoi digon o sicrwydd i'n heconomi ni, i'n hallforwyr ni ac i'n cyflogwyr ni. Ond mae cytundeb o'r math hwn yn mynd i fod yn gytundeb sy'n well na dim cytundeb. Ac mae gyda ni senario, o bosib, yn y flwyddyn newydd, ac mae Dai Lloyd yn cydnabod, bod efallai cytundeb wedi ei gyrraedd ond bod e ddim mewn grym eto, neu efallai ei fod e wrthi'n cael ei negodi, neu efallai ei fod wedi cael ei negodi ond heb gael ei arwyddo. Felly, mae pob un o'r senarios hynny'n bosib, ac, wrth gwrs, ni'n gweithio i edrych ar beth gall ddigwydd yn y senarios hynny. Fel bydd e'n gwybod, mae'r trefniadau ni wedi bod yn eu gwneud, hyd yn hyn, ar sail gadael heb unrhyw fath o gytundeb. Felly, mae gyda ni'r worst-case senario hynny fel rhan o'n cynllunio ni hefyd.