techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I'm sorry, I'm going to have to intervene. This question is about Montgomeryshire.
Welsh: Mae'n ddrwg gen i, mae'n rhaid i mi ymyrryd. Mae'r cwestiwn hwn yn ymwneud â Sir Drefaldwyn.
English: I did preface my remarks, Llywydd, to talk about the Newtown bypass, which has just been referenced.
Welsh: Fe wnes i ragflaenu fy sylwadau, Llywydd, i sôn am ffordd osgoi'r Drenewydd, y cyfeiriwyd ati gynnau.
English: It's stretching it slightly to talk about Carmarthenshire.
Welsh: Mae'n sôn am Sir Gaerfyrddin yn ymestyn pethau braidd.
English: Indeed. I'm talking about the way local authorities are implementing and interpreting this Act, and whether the First Minister, and the Welsh Government, will issue strong guidance to local authorities, to make sure the emphasis is on short journeys, practical journeys, and not bypasses.
Welsh: Yn wir. Rwy'n sôn am y ffordd y mae awdurdodau lleol yn gweithredu a dehongli'r Ddeddf hon, a pha un a wnaiff y Prif Weinidog, a Llywodraeth Cymru, gyhoeddi canllawiau cryf i awdurdodau lleol, i wneud yn siŵr bod y pwyslais ar deithiau byr, teithiau ymarferol, ac nid ffyrdd osgoi.
English: The Member should not get the idea that there is a plan to merge Montgomeryshire with Carmarthenshire - at this stage. The point that the Member makes is important, and he has been consistent in his view that it's absolutely crucial to promote cycling as more than just recreation - that it is seen as an integral part of the transport system, if I can put it that way. That's what the active travel Act was designed to do, and that's why it's so important that, where funding is available, then cycle routes, for example, are provided, when road schemes are in place. The Church Village bypass is an example of that. And it is something, of course, that we seek to promote through funding, and also through the legislation itself.
Welsh: Ni ddylai'r Aelod gael yr argraff bod cynllun i uno Sir Drefaldwyn â Sir Gaerfyrddin - ar hyn o bryd. Mae'r pwynt y mae'r Aelod yn ei wneud yn bwysig, ac mae wedi bod yn gyson yn ei farn ei bod yn hollbwysig i hyrwyddo beicio fel mwy na dim ond hamdden - ei fod yn cael ei ystyried yn rhan annatod o'r system drafnidiaeth, os gallaf ei roi felly. Dyna y bwriadwyd i'r Ddeddf teithio llesol ei wneud, a dyna pam mae mor bwysig, pan fo cyllid ar gael, bod llwybrau beicio, er enghraifft, yn cael eu darparu, pan fo cynlluniau ffyrdd ar waith. Mae ffordd osgoi Pentre'r Eglwys yn enghraifft o hynny. Ac mae'n rhywbeth, wrth gwrs, yr ydym ni'n ceisio ei hyrwyddo trwy gyllido, a hefyd drwy'r ddeddfwriaeth ei hun.
English: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. It's clear now that the failure of the Prime Minister's cynical, opportunist snap election gamble has thrown the whole Brexit negotiating process into confusion, perhaps exacerbated by the fact that she's appointed 16 Remainers to her Cabinet of 23. And, in particular, this throws perhaps more into question than previously the nature of our border controls post Brexit. I'm wondering where the Labour Party now stands in this process, because I'm sure the First Minister will have seen that both Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell have said that the Labour Party is formally committed to taking Britain out of the single market and the customs union, whereas Keir Starmer has said he wants to negotiate a new form of single market agreement, and Barry Gardiner, the shadow international trade Secretary, has criticised Mrs May for taking single market membership off the table right from the very beginning. So, can the First Minister tell me whether he is now a Corbynite or whether he is a Starmerite?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. Mae'n amlwg bellach bod methiant gambl etholiad dirybudd sinigaidd, manteisgar Prif Weinidog y DU wedi creu dryswch ynghylch holl broses y trafodaethau Brexit, sefyllfa sy'n cael ei gwaethygu efallai gan y ffaith ei bod hi wedi penodi 16 o unigolion a oedd o blaid aros yn yr UE i'w Chabinet o 23. Ac, yn arbennig, mae hyn yn creu mwy o amheuaeth nag o'r blaen ynghylch natur ein rheolaethau ffin ar ôl Brexit. Roeddwn i'n meddwl tybed beth yw safbwynt y Blaid Lafur yn y broses hon erbyn hyn, gan fy mod i'n siŵr y bydd y Prif Weinidog wedi gweld bod Jeremy Corbyn a John McDonnell wedi dweud bod y Blaid Lafur wedi ymrwymo'n ffurfiol i dynnu Prydain allan o'r farchnad sengl a'r undeb tollau, tra bod Keir Starmer wedi dweud ei fod eisiau trafod ffurf newydd o gytundeb marchnad sengl, ac mae Barry Gardiner, ysgrifennydd masnach ryngwladol yr wrthblaid, wedi beirniadu Mrs May am gymryd aelodaeth o'r farchnad sengl oddi ar y bwrdd o'r cychwyn cyntaf. Felly, a all y Prif Weinidog ddweud wrthyf a yw'n Corbynite neu'n Starmerite erbyn hyn?
English: Well, what we do know from the election is the hard Brexit that is espoused and promoted by UKIP is dead. People were asked to vote on a particular version of Brexit - specifically asked to vote on that - by Theresa May, and she did not get that mandate. So, what happens next? We have put forward, together with Plaid Cymru, a White Paper that suggests a way forward as far as Brexit is concerned. I have today written to the Prime Minister, reminding her that it takes more than words when it comes to seeking engagement with the devolved Governments. I welcome the words of Guto Bebb, for example, where he recognises the reality of the situation - that a sustainable Brexit can only happen if the devolved Governments are fully part of that process, and I hope that the small group in Whitehall that have been trying to control this take note.
Welsh: Wel, yr hyn yr ydym ni'n ei wybod o'r etholiad yw bod y Brexit caled sy'n cael ei arddel a'i hyrwyddo gan UKIP yn gelain. Gofynnwyd i bobl bleidleisio ar fersiwn benodol o Brexit - gofynnwyd iddynt yn benodol i bleidleisio ar hynny - gan Theresa May, ac ni chafodd y mandad hwnnw. Felly, beth sy'n digwydd nesaf? Rydym ni wedi cyflwyno, ynghyd â Phlaid Cymru, Papur Gwyn sy'n awgrymu ffordd ymlaen cyn belled ag y mae Brexit yn y cwestiwn. Rwyf wedi ysgrifennu heddiw at Brif Weinidog y DU, yn ei hatgoffa bod angen mwy na geiriau o ran ceisio ymgysylltu â'r Llywodraethau datganoledig. Rwy'n croesawu geiriau Guto Bebb, er enghraifft, lle mae'n cydnabod realiti'r sefyllfa - na all Brexit cynaliadwy ddigwydd oni bai bod y Llywodraethau datganoledig yn rhan gyflawn o'r broses honno, ac rwy'n gobeithio y bydd y grŵp bach yn Whitehall sydd wedi bod yn ceisio rheoli hyn yn cymryd sylw.
English: I read, of course, the Government's White Paper on Brexit, which, effectively, isn't in favour of border controls at all in any meaningful sense. My interest in this is on the impact of unskilled and semi-skilled labour being imported in uncontrollable numbers and the effect that that has upon working class wages. Now, the Bank of England has published a substantial report on 'The impact of immigration on occupational wages: vidence from Britain', the conclusion of which was that a 10 per cent rise in the proportion of immigrants is associated with a 2 per cent reduction in pay in the semi- and unskilled services sector. I struggle to understand why the Labour Party, of all parties, is prepared to countenance a situation where working class wages are driven down so that, for many people, the minimum wage is the maximum wage.
Welsh: Darllenais, wrth gwrs, Bapur Gwyn y Llywodraeth ar Brexit, nad yw, i bob pwrpas, o blaid rheolaethau ffin mewn unrhyw ystyr ystyrlon. Fy niddordeb yn hyn yw effaith llafur di-grefft a lled-fedrus yn cael ei fewnforio mewn niferoedd na ellir eu rheoli a'r effaith y mae hynny'n ei chael ar gyflogau'r dosbarth gweithiol. Nawr, mae Banc Lloegr wedi cyhoeddi adroddiad sylweddol o'r enw 'The impact of immigration on occupational wages: Evidence from Britain', a ddaeth i'r casgliad bod cynnydd o 10 y cant i gyfran y mewnfudwyr yn gysylltiedig â gostyngiad o 2 y cant i gyflogau yn y sector gwasanaethau lled-fedrus a di-grefft. Rwy'n ei chael hi'n anodd deall pam mae'r Blaid Lafur, o bob plaid, yn barod i ystyried y fath sefyllfa lle mae cyflogau dosbarth gweithiol yn cael eu gyrru i lawr sy'n golygu, i lawer o bobl, mai'r isafswm cyflog yw'r cyflog uchaf.
English: The greatest threat to people's wages is continued austerity - that is the greatest threat. I wonder if he would make it clear what his position was on the minimum wage, for example - whether he supported its introduction by a Labour Government, and whether he supports the need for greater focus on policing the minimum wage, and whether he would see an increase in the minimum wage to the level of a living wage. Those are the ways to protect people. Yes, it is important to protect people, and not just our own people, but people from other countries, from exploitation, and that needs more resources to be put into the policing of that. But there's no doubt that the greatest threat to wages is a Tory Government that is bent on austerity.
Welsh: Y bygythiad mwyaf i gyflogau pobl yw cyni cyllidol parhaus - dyna'r bygythiad mwyaf. Tybed a fyddai'n ei gwneud yn eglur beth oedd ei safbwynt ar yr isafswm cyflog, er enghraifft - pa un a wnaeth gefnogi ei gyflwyniad gan Lywodraeth Lafur, a pha un a yw'n cefnogi'r angen am fwy o bwyslais ar blismona'r isafswm cyflog, a pha un a fyddai'n gweld cynnydd i'r isafswm cyflog i lefel cyflog byw. Dyna'r ffyrdd o ddiogelu pobl. Ydy, mae'n bwysig amddiffyn pobl, ac nid dim ond ein pobl ein hunain, ond pobl o wledydd eraill, rhag cam-fanteisio, ac mae angen cyfrannu mwy o adnoddau i blismona hynny. Ond nid oes unrhyw amheuaeth mai'r bygythiad mwyaf i gyflogau yw Llywodraeth Dorïaidd sydd â'i bryd ar gyni cyllidol.
English: I notice that the First Minister neatly sidesteps the question. UKIP did actually support the introduction of the minimum wage, and, certainly, we support policing it effectively, because the law of the land should be obeyed. And it's no answer to the problem of wage compression to say that we will take strong action against employers who are breaking the law. What is of more concern is that the average wage rate at the bottom of the income scale is being driven down for more and more people. And there are hundreds of thousands of people who are on the breadline who are forced into even more precarious situations as a result of uncontrolled immigration. Surely, firm control of unskilled and semi-skilled migration from the European Union, which can be controlled from the rest of the world under existing law, is a vital necessity for ordinary working-class people.
Welsh: Sylwaf fod y Prif Weinidog yn osgoi'r cwestiwn yn fedrus. A dweud y gwir, fe wnaeth UKIP gefnogi cyflwyno'r isafswm cyflog, ac, yn sicr, rydym ni'n cefnogi ei blismona'n effeithiol, oherwydd dylid ufuddhau cyfraith y wlad. Ac nid yw'n unrhyw ateb i'r broblem o gywasgu cyflogau i ddweud y byddwn yn cymryd camau cryf yn erbyn cyflogwyr sy'n torri'r gyfraith. Yr hyn sy'n peri mwy o bryder yw bod cyfradd cyflogau cyfartalog ar waelod y raddfa incwm yn cael ei gyrru i lawr ar gyfer mwy a mwy o bobl. A cheir cannoedd o filoedd o bobl sy'n byw ar y gwynt sy'n cael eu gorfodi i sefyllfaoedd mwy ansicr fyth o ganlyniad i fewnfudo heb ei reoli. Yn sicr, mae rheolaeth gadarn o fewnfudo di-grefft a lled-fedrus o'r Undeb Ewropeaidd, y gellir ei reoli o weddill y byd o dan y gyfraith bresennol, yn anghenraid hanfodol i bobl gyffredin y dosbarth gweithiol.
English: First of all, again, he misses the point about border control. If you want to have border control, you have a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic. There is no other way of doing it, unless you want to put British border agency officials in the Republic's airports and ports, and that is a strategy fraught with problems, if I can put it diplomatically. That situation has still not been properly resolved. But, for me, the issue of low wages is driven by the austerity we've see for the past seven years, the fact we haven't seen real increases in pay, the fact that we've seen people who are in work lose in-work benefits. We used to say - and the Secretary of State got himself into trouble on this - to people, 'If you get a job, your income will increase'. That is no longer the case because of the fact that those at the top of the income scale have received more money through tax cuts and those at the bottom have received less money through the reduction and loss of in-work benefits. That's what the focus should be on - making sure that those people who are working hard, working long hours, get the support they deserve, and they haven't had it over the last seven years.
Welsh: Yn gyntaf oll, unwaith eto, mae'n methu'r pwynt am reoli ffiniau. Os ydych chi eisiau cael rheolaeth ffiniau, mae gennych chi ffin galed rhwng Gogledd Iwerddon a'r Weriniaeth. Nid oes unrhyw ffordd arall o'i wneud, oni bai eich bod chi eisiau rhoi swyddogion asiantaeth ffiniau Prydain ym meysydd awyr a phorthladdoedd y Weriniaeth, ac mae honno'n strategaeth sy'n llawn problemau, os gallaf ei roi'n ddiplomatig. Mae'r sefyllfa honno, i mi, yn dal i fod heb ei datrys yn briodol. Ond, i mi, mae'r mater o gyflogau isel yn cael ei ysgogi gan y cyni cyllidol yr ydym ni wedi ei weld dros y saith mlynedd diwethaf, y ffaith nad ydym wedi gweld cynnydd gwirioneddol i gyflogau, y ffaith ein bod ni wedi gweld pobl sydd mewn gwaith yn colli budd-daliadau mewn gwaith. Roeddem ni'n arfer dweud wrth bobl - a chafodd yr Ysgrifennydd Gwladol ei hun i drafferthion ynghylch hyn - 'Os byddwch chi'n cael swydd, bydd eich incwm yn cynyddu'. Nid yw hynny'n wir mwyach oherwydd y ffaith fod y rhai ar frig y raddfa incwm wedi cael mwy o arian trwy doriadau treth a'r rhai sydd ar y gwaelod wedi cael llai o arian drwy leihau a cholli budd-daliadau mewn gwaith. Dyna'r hyn y dylem ni fod yn canolbwyntio arno - gwneud yn siŵr bod y bobl hynny sy'n gweithio'n galed, yn gweithio oriau hir, yn cael y cymorth y maen nhw'n ei haeddu, ac nad ydynt wedi ei gael dros y saith mlynedd diwethaf.
English: First Minister, the NHS is our most cherished public service. All of us rely on it and it's the single largest spending commitment in the Welsh budget, which reflects its importance to our people. Are you satisfied with the financial governance of the NHS?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, y GIG yw'r gwasanaeth cyhoeddus y mae gennym ni fwyaf o feddwl ohono. Mae pob un ohonom ni'n dibynnu arno a dyna'r ymrwymiad gwariant unigol mwyaf yng nghyllideb Cymru, sy'n adlewyrchu ei bwysigrwydd i'n pobl. A ydych chi'n fodlon â llywodraethiad ariannol y GIG?
English: Yes, I am. There are issue that arise every year from the boards, but they've been given a three-year timescale within which to operate when it comes to producing their budget. But, of course, we would always want to see more funds made available to the Welsh budget through the ending of austerity in Westminster.
Welsh: Ydw, mi ydwyf. Ceir materion sy'n codi bob blwyddyn o'r byrddau, ond rhoddwyd amserlen tair blynedd iddynt i weithredu yn unol â hi pan ddaw i gynhyrchu eu cyllideb. Ond, wrth gwrs, byddem ni bob amser eisiau gweld mwy o gyllid yn cael ei roi ar gael i gyllideb Cymru trwy roi terfyn ar gyni cyllidol yn San Steffan.
English: On Friday, it was announced that four of the 10 NHS organisations have failed to break even over the three-year financial period. Now, we know that three health boards have been placed under targeted intervention, and a fourth is being monitored. You mentioned that you introduced three-year budgeting in order to try to solve those problems, but we are still seeing these deficits emerge over that three-year period. First Minister, under your watch, are NHS finances sound?
Welsh: Ddydd Gwener, cyhoeddwyd bod pedwar o'r 10 sefydliad GIG wedi methu â mantoli'r gyllideb dros y cyfnod ariannol tair blynedd. Nawr, rydym ni'n gwybod bod tri bwrdd iechyd wedi bod yn destun ymyrraeth wedi'i thargedu, a bod pedwerydd yn cael ei fonitro. Soniasoch eich bod wedi cyflwyno cyllidebau tair blynedd er mwyn ceisio datrys y problemau hynny, ond rydym ni'n dal i weld y diffygion hyn yn dod i'r amlwg dros y cyfnod hwnnw o dair blynedd. Prif Weinidog, o dan eich goruchwyliaeth chi, a yw cyllid y GIG yn gadarn?
English: Yes, they are. Four organisations out of 10 were unable to meet their three-year duty. We've been open about the particular challenges those organisations are facing, and it's why they've all been escalated under our NHS intervention arrangements.
Welsh: Ydy, mae ef. Nid oedd pedwar sefydliad allan o 10 yn gallu bodloni eu dyletswydd tair blynedd. Rydym ni wedi bod yn agored am yr heriau penodol y mae'r sefydliadau hynny'n eu hwynebu, a dyna pam maen nhw i gyd wedi cael eu huwchgyfeirio o dan ein trefniadau ymyrryd yn y GIG.
English: A situation where four out of seven health boards aren't meeting your targets isn't one that can be described as financially sound. This is about how the NHS is being managed, it's about supporting the staff and the patients of the NHS by ensuring that the service is in good financial health. It's about health boards meeting the statutory duties that you have set out. Now, in March, your health Secretary said that the four health boards in question would not be bailed out. He also said that he was, quote, 'pretty certain that NHS services wouldn't be cut as a result of these deficits'. Now, being pretty certain doesn't fill me with confidence, First Minister. What we need today is a cast-iron guarantee. So, can you tell us: when will the NHS finances improve? Is it still the case that you won't bail out struggling NHS health boards? And as the Government responsible for the Welsh NHS, will you guarantee that deficit repayment plans for these health boards won't result in cuts to our health services?
Welsh: Ni ellir disgrifio sefyllfa lle nad yw pedwar allan o saith bwrdd iechyd yn bodloni eich targedau fel bod yn ariannol gadarn. Mae hyn yn ymwneud â sut y mae'r GIG yn cael ei reoli, mae'n ymwneud â chefnogi staff a chleifion y GIG drwy sicrhau bod y gwasanaeth mewn cyflwr ariannol da. Mae'n ymwneud â byrddau iechyd yn cyflawni'r dyletswyddau statudol yr ydych chi wedi eu cyflwyno. Nawr, ym mis Mawrth, dywedodd eich Ysgrifennydd iechyd na fyddai'r pedwar bwrdd iechyd o dan sylw yn cael eu hachub yn ariannol. Dywedodd hefyd ei fod, a dyfynnaf, 'yn weddol sicr na fyddai gwasanaethau'r GIG yn cael eu torri o ganlyniad i'r diffygion hyn.' Nawr, nid yw bod yn weddol sicr yn rhoi fawr o hyder i mi, Prif Weinidog. Yr hyn sydd ei angen arnom ni heddiw yw sicrwydd pendant. Felly, a allwch chi ddweud wrthym: pryd y bydd cyllid y GIG yn gwella? A yw'n dal yn wir na fyddwch chi'n achub byrddau iechyd y GIG sydd mewn trafferthion? Ac fel y Llywodraeth sy'n gyfrifol am GIG Cymru, a wnewch chi sicrhau na fydd y cynlluniau ad-dalu diffygion ar gyfer y byrddau iechyd hyn yn arwain at doriadau i'n gwasanaethau iechyd?
English: No services have suffered as a result of these deficits. We have ensured that these organisations have sufficient cash to meet their normal commitments, and we manage their deficits within the overall health budget, subject to audit confirmation. The overall health budget was balanced in 2016-17. Now, through the intervention arrangements, we are working closely with those organisations to address the governance, management and service issues that underpin their deficits and we will not shy away from taking firm action with these organisations if that is what is necessary.
Welsh: Nid oes unrhyw wasanaethau wedi dioddef o ganlyniad i'r diffygion hyn. Rydym ni wedi sicrhau bod gan y sefydliadau ddigon o arian i fodloni eu hymrwymiadau arferol, ac rydym ni'n rheoli eu diffygion o fewn y gyllideb iechyd gyffredinol, yn amodol ar gadarnhad archwiliad. Roedd y gyllideb iechyd gyffredinol wedi ei mantoli yn 2016-17. Nawr, drwy'r trefniadau ymyrraeth, rydym ni'n gweithio'n agos â'r sefydliadau hynny i fynd i'r afael â'r materion llywodraethu, rheoli a gwasanaeth sy'n sail i'w diffygion ac ni fyddwn yn osgoi cymryd camau cadarn gyda'r sefydliadau hyn os mai dyna sydd ei angen.
English: No guarantees.
Welsh: Dim sicrwydd.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. First Minister, one of the stories that came through at the general election and, because of the campaigning, didn't get the coverage it deserved was the lack of this Government's ability to meet its commitment from 2010 that all cancer patients in Wales would have a keyworker. Can you explain why, seven years on, so many cancer patients are not getting that key worker identified when they get the diagnosis in Wales?
Welsh: Diolch i chi, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, un o'r straeon a ddaeth i'r amlwg yn yr etholiad cyffredinol ac, oherwydd yr ymgyrchu, na chafodd y sylw yr oedd yn ei haeddu oedd diffyg gallu'r Llywodraeth hon i fodloni ei hymrwymiad o 2010 y byddai pob claf canser yng Nghymru yn cael gweithiwr allweddol. A allwch chi esbonio pam, saith mlynedd yn ddiweddarach, bod cymaint o gleifion canser nad ydynt yn cael y gweithiwr allweddol hwnnw pan eu bod yn cael y diagnosis yng Nghymru?
English: One of the messages of the general election was that people didn't want the Welsh Conservatives. I mean, I'm fairly surprised he actually raises it. I do wonder how much more he can take of being replaced as a leader on programmes, but he asked a question about cancer key workers. That is something that we're still working towards to make sure that everyone has that key worker. He will see that the amount of money that's gone into cancer treatment has increased over the years.
Welsh: Un o negeseuon yr etholiad cyffredinol oedd nad oedd pobl eisiau'r Ceidwadwyr Cymreig. Hynny yw, rwy'n synnu braidd ei fod yn ei godi. Rwy'n meddwl tybed faint yn fwy y gall ei gymryd o gael ei ddisodli fel arweinydd ar raglenni, ond gofynnodd gwestiwn am weithwyr canser allweddol. Mae hynny'n rhywbeth yr ydym ni'n dal i weithio tuag ato i wneud yn siŵr bod gan bawb y gweithiwr allweddol hwnnw. Bydd yn gweld bod y swm o arian sydd wedi mynd i mewn i driniaeth ganser wedi cynyddu dros y blynyddoedd.
English: You can have the pot shot, First Minister, but people would've listened and heard that you didn't give an answer why people don't get a key worker. So, you can carry on with the pot shots, but people who get a cancer diagnosis deserve all the assistance they can get, and as someone who's lost family members, along with other Members in this Chamber, we welcomed that commitment that the Government made at that time in 2010. But as Macmillan has identified, at least a third of patients do not get that key worker when they get the diagnosis. It's a simple question, First Minister, and instead of being flippant, can you give a serious answer as to when that target will be met?
Welsh: Gallwch redeg arnaf i, Prif Weinidog, ond byddai pobl wedi gwrando ac wedi clywed na wnaethoch chi roi ateb pam nad yw pobl yn cael gweithiwr allweddol. Felly, gallwch chi barhau i redeg arnaf i, ond mae pobl sy'n cael diagnosis o ganser yn haeddu'r holl gymorth y gallant ei gael, ac fel rhywun sydd wedi colli aelodau teulu, ynghyd ag Aelodau eraill yn y Siambr hon, croesawyd yr ymrwymiad hwnnw gennym a wnaeth y Llywodraeth ar y pryd yn 2010. Ond fel y mae Macmillan wedi ei nodi, mae o leiaf traean y cleifion nad ydynt yn cael y gweithiwr allweddol hwnnw pan eu bod yn cael y diagnosis. Mae'n gwestiwn syml, Prif Weinidog, ac yn hytrach na bod yn wamal, a allwch chi roi ateb difrifol ynghylch pryd y bydd y targed hwnnw'n cael ei fodloni?