English: I thank the Minister for his statement and the Chair of the committee for the procedural background I might have expected to have had from the Minister. We haven't had an explanation as to why having, since the original set on 26 March, had a series of amendments to those regulations - . Now that approach has been changed and the initial overall set of regulations and all the amendments are then revoked and then largely reinstated before a new set of amendments. What's the purpose of that procedural approach? I'm disappointed that, again, it's over three weeks since these amendments were made, on 10 July, before we debate them. We're therefore debating and voting on something when it's already been amended twice. We were told by the First Minister there are going to be further amendments that are going to be made on 7 August. It's 5 August today. Why couldn't that be done two days earlier so we could have proper scrutiny by the Senedd? The original set of regulations, while we would have been happy to support a degree of restriction in order to protect NHS capacity from being overwhelmed, by the time we even got to vote on the first set of regulations, that issue was, we felt, under control. We've opposed all the regulations to date. Because these No. 2 regulations reinstate that panoply of regulations, we also propose to vote against these. Again, we think it's wrong, the scale of the restrictions and closures, and the putting in law the huge inflexibility of that, the 2m distancing, we think is wrong. I also consider that these regulations are unnecessary and disproportionate, and that applies even more strongly given how low the level of prevalence of COVID-19 now is - this level of extraordinary restrictions and state power, and the impact that this has on the economy, but also on people's well-being and also, frankly, health and, I fear, death rates for other diseases in the NHS. It is wholly disproportionate. We oppose it. The two sets of amending regulations strike me as being entirely liberalising, albeit in a small way, and therefore we see no need to oppose the amendment regulations, should there be a vote. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Gweinidog am ei ddatganiad ac i Gadeirydd y pwyllgor am y cefndir gweithdrefnol y gallwn fod wedi disgwyl ei gael gan y Gweinidog. Nid ydym wedi cael eglurhad ynglŷn â pham, ers y set wreiddiol ar 26 Mawrth, y cafwyd cyfres o welliannau i'r rheoliadau hynny - . Bellach, mae'r dull hwnnw wedi'i newid a chaiff y set gyffredinol gyntaf o reoliadau a'r holl welliannau eu dirymu wedyn a'u hadfer i raddau helaeth cyn cyflwyno cyfres newydd o welliannau. Beth yw diben y dull gweithdrefnol hwnnw? Rwy'n siomedig, unwaith eto, fod dros dair wythnos ers i'r gwelliannau hyn gael eu gwneud, ar 10 Gorffennaf, cyn inni eu trafod. Felly, rydym yn dadlau ac yn pleidleisio ar rywbeth pan fo eisoes wedi'i ddiwygio ddwywaith. Dywedodd y Prif Weinidog wrthym y bydd gwelliannau pellach yn cael eu gwneud ar 7 Awst. Mae'n 5 Awst heddiw. Pam na ellid gwneud hynny ddeuddydd yn gynharach fel y gallai'r Senedd eu craffu'n briodol? Y rheoliadau gwreiddiol, er y byddem wedi bod yn fodlon cefnogi rhywfaint o gyfyngu er mwyn diogelu capasiti'r GIG rhag cael ei drechu, erbyn inni hyd yn oed bleidleisio ar y set gyntaf o reoliadau, roedd y mater hwnnw, yn ein tyb ni, dan reolaeth. Rydym wedi gwrthwynebu'r holl reoliadau hyd yn hyn. Gan fod y rheoliadau Rhif 2 hyn yn adfer yr holl reoliadau hynny, rydym hefyd yn bwriadu pleidleisio yn erbyn y rhain. Unwaith eto, rydym yn credu bod graddau'r cyfyngiadau a'r cau yn anghywir, ac mae rhoi anhyblygrwydd enfawr y cadw pellter o 2m mewn cyfraith yn anghywir yn ein barn ni. Rwyf hefyd yn ystyried bod y rheoliadau hyn yn ddiangen ac yn anghymesur, ac mae hynny hyd yn oed yn fwy perthnasol o ystyried pa mor isel yw nifer yr achosion o COVID-19 erbyn hyn - y lefel hon o gyfyngiadau eithriadol a grym y wladwriaeth, a'r effaith y mae hyn yn ei chael ar yr economi, ond hefyd ar les pobl a hefyd, a bod yn blwmp ac yn blaen, ar iechyd, a chyfraddau marwolaeth, ysywaeth, o glefydau eraill yn y GIG. Mae'n gwbl anghymesur. Rydym yn ei wrthwynebu. Mae'r ddwy set o reoliadau diwygio yn fy nharo'n gyfan gwbl fel rhai sy'n llacio, er mewn ffordd fach, ac felly ni welwn fod angen gwrthwynebu'r rheoliadau diwygio os oes pleidlais. Diolch.