English: I think you rightly identify an issue that follows on from the approach that we've taken of co-production, which is supported by all Members here, that, in terms of assessing the needs of carers, it should be something on which we work in collaboration with the individual who is looking to see the right care package - the right package of support and advice for them - but they also, of course, have the right to advocacy as well, and they also have the right to make representations when they don't think the right package has been put forward for them. All of those places are not only there in terms of the legislation, but also the codes as well. Now, if there are specific instances, Suzy, that you want to draw to my intention, I'm more than happy to look at them. There will, of course, be variability in the way that this is done between local authorities, but our expectation, as the Welsh Government, is that the entire focus in every individual circumstance is that this is done with the individual to provide them with the right package of support for them as a carer, and, if they're not satisfied with that, then they have that recourse to advocacy, they have that right to challenge that package that's been put forward. There's tremendous work, I have to say, being done on the ground as well by people such as the Carers Trust, who I meet regularly, and take these issues up on behalf of individuals who aren't happy with the package. There is the backdrop to this as well, I have to say, which is the context - that in putting the right support and advice package together, including respite support for carers, we do it against the context in which we exist. You will see local authorities in the region that the Member represents as well saying, 'Ideally, we would like to provide something that is more enriched, more deep, wider for that individual. We cannot do it because of the cutbacks in local authorities', and that is the reality of some of the decisions that are made in a co-productive way. It's right to do it in a co-productive way, but when a local authority says, 'Well, because of the financial constraints we're under, which is because of where we are with austerity funding, we cannot provide the entirety of services that we wanted', that has an impact on the individual at the end. It's a tragedy to see, and I saw it when I met recently with young carers in Carmarthen; they liked the approach that we were taking to this, they liked the fact that their voices were being heard now more than ever, but they were frustrated when, with the best will in the world, in their local area they were being told, 'Well, that day club, that evening out, that whatever - it isn't available anymore. We'll have to look at something else'. So, we have to wrestle with this all the time, about how we put the right package together. But they have advocacy, they have the right to co-determination of this package being put forward, and I think that's the right legislative framework to be put in place.
Welsh: Credaf eich bod yn gywir i nodi mater sy'n dilyn ymlaen o'r dull rydym wedi'i fabwysiadu mewn perthynas â chydgynhyrchu, a gefnogir gan yr holl Aelodau yma, sef y dylai asesu anghenion gofalwyr fod yn rhywbeth rydym yn gweithio arno mewn cydweithrediad â'r unigolyn sy'n chwilio am y pecyn gofal cywir - y pecyn priodol o gymorth a chyngor ar eu cyfer hwy - ond mae ganddynt hefyd hawl i eiriolaeth yn ogystal, wrth gwrs, a hawl i leisio barn os nad ydynt yn credu bod y pecyn priodol wedi cael ei ddarparu ar eu cyfer. Mae pob un o'r pethau hynny yno o ran y ddeddfwriaeth, ond o ran y codau yn ogystal. Nawr, os ydych eisiau tynnu fy sylw at enghreifftiau penodol, Suzy, rwy'n fwy na pharod i edrych arnynt. Wrth gwrs, bydd amrywio yn y ffordd y gwneir hyn rhwng awdurdodau lleol, ond ein disgwyliad ni fel Llywodraeth Cymru yw bod y ffocws cyfan ym mhob achos unigol ar sicrhau bod hyn yn cael ei wneud gyda'r unigolyn er mwyn gallu darparu'r pecyn cymorth cywir ar eu cyfer fel gofalwyr, ac os nad ydynt yn fodlon â hynny, yna gallant droi at eiriolaeth, mae ganddynt hawl i herio'r pecyn a gyflwynwyd iddynt. Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud bod gwaith aruthrol yn cael ei wneud ar lawr gwlad hefyd gan bobl megis Ymddiriedolaeth y Gofalwyr, ac rwy'n cyfarfod â hwy'n rheolaidd ac yn codi'r materion hyn ar ran unigolion nad ydynt yn hapus gyda'r pecyn. Mae'r cefndir i hyn yn ogystal, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, sef y cyd-destun - wrth greu'r pecyn cymorth a chyngor priodol, gan gynnwys cymorth gofal seibiant ar gyfer gofalwyr, rydym yn gwneud hynny yn y cyd-destun rydym ynddo. Fe welwch awdurdodau lleol yn y rhanbarth y mae'r Aelod yn ei gynrychioli yn dweud hefyd, 'Yn ddelfrydol, byddem yn hoffi cynnig rhywbeth mwy gwerthfawr, dyfnach, ehangach i'r unigolyn hwnnw. Ni allwn wneud hynny oherwydd y toriadau mewn awdurdodau lleol', a dyna yw realiti rhai o'r penderfyniadau a wneir mewn modd cydgynhyrchiol. Mae'n iawn ei wneud mewn modd cydgynhyrchiol, ond pan fydd awdurdod lleol yn dweud, 'Wel, oherwydd y cyfyngiadau ariannol rydym yn eu hwynebu, o ganlyniad i'n sefyllfa gyda chyllid cyni, ni allwn ddarparu'r holl wasanaethau roeddem eisiau eu darparu', mae hynny'n effeithio ar yr unigolyn yn y pen draw. Mae'n drasiedi pan fyddwn yn gweld hynny'n digwydd, ac fe'i gwelais yn digwydd pan gyfarfûm â gofalwyr ifanc yng Nghaerfyrddin yn ddiweddar; roeddent yn hoffi'r dull rydym wedi ei fabwysiadu mewn perthynas â hyn, roeddent yn hoffi'r ffaith bod eu lleisiau'n cael eu clywed yn awr yn fwy nag erioed, ond roeddent yn teimlo'n rhwystredig pan oeddent yn clywed pobl yn eu hardal leol yn dweud, gyda'r ewyllys gorau yn y byd, 'Wel, y clwb dydd, y noson allan, beth bynnag - nid yw ar gael mwyach. Bydd yn rhaid i ni edrych ar rywbeth arall'. Felly, mae'n rhaid i ni ymgodymu â hyn drwy'r amser, o ran sut rydym yn creu'r pecyn cywir. Ond mae ganddynt eiriolaeth, mae ganddynt hawl i benderfynu ar y cyd a ddylid cyflwyno'r pecyn hwn, a chredaf mai dyna'r fframwaith deddfwriaethol priodol i'w roi ar waith.