English: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. I want to thank Members for their contributions today. Just to address a couple of the very specific points - and I thank the committe, Huw, for its rapid work on this, as always - I'm afraid I do not accept the recommendation or conclusion that clause 3 of the Bill would amount to a relevant provision for the purposes of Standing Order 29. Aside from clause 3 (5), clause 3 contains technical provisions that are concerned with how the Bill works, rather than substantive provisions. And, as a matter of practice, Welsh Government do not generally include non-operative clauses within the LCM, which you acknowledged in your response, I think. On the MOU, I absolutely do accept that recommendation and, as soon as the MOU has been agreed, it will be shared with the Senedd. And I completely agree with your rationale for that. In terms of why the Bill, why not a Welsh Bill, this is a private Member's Bill. If we had decided to take the path that Plaid Cymru were outlining, then we would have had a regulatory gap and what Janet Finch-Saunders mentioned would have come to pass: we would have had landings here in Wales, which we would not have been able to stop while we had a regulatory gap. So, as this was a private Member's Bill, it makes a great deal of sense to line up the regulatory process to make sure there isn't a gap. I completely agree that that's the right thing to do and I'm very much asking Members to support this today. However, I will say that it would be much better if the UK Government did consult us properly in the process of this. We would be able to reach much better conclusions together than we do when we find things out the day before. So, whilst I absolutely agree with the import of this Bill, the way that we found out about it from the UK Government is not optimal. So, if you want to send that message back, Janet, that would be very helpful indeed. But in summation, Deputy Llywydd, the Bill sent a clear message to the rest of the world that we do not support this fishing practice, which is so damaging to the global shark populations. I therefore move the motion and ask that all Members support it. Diolch.
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Hoffwn ddiolch i'r Aelodau am eu cyfraniadau heddiw. Dim ond i fynd i'r afael â rhai o'r pwyntiau penodol iawn - a diolch i'r pwyllgor, Huw, am ei waith cyflym ar hyn, fel bob amser - mae gen i ofn nad ydw i'n derbyn yr argymhelliad na'r casgliad y byddai cymal 3 y Bil yn gyfystyr â darpariaeth berthnasol at ddibenion Rheol Sefydlog 29. Ar wahân i gymal 3 (5), mae cymal 3 yn cynnwys darpariaethau technegol sy'n ymwneud â sut mae'r Bil yn gweithio, yn hytrach na darpariaethau sylweddol. Ac, fel mater o ymarfer, nid yw Llywodraeth Cymru ar y cyfan yn cynnwys cymalau nad ydyn nhw'n weithredol yn y memorandwm cydsyniad deddfwriaethol, y gwnaethoch chi gydnabod yn eich ymateb chi, rwy'n credu. O ran y memorandwm cyd-ddealltwriaeth, rydw i'n derbyn yr argymhelliad hwnnw yn llwyr a chyn gynted ag y bo'r memorandwm cyd-ddealltwriaeth wedi'i gytuno, caiff ei rannu gyda'r Senedd. Ac rwy'n cytuno'n llwyr â'ch rhesymeg dros hynny. O ran pam y mae'r Bil, pam ddim Bil Cymreig, Bil Aelod preifat yw hwn. Pe baem ni wedi penderfynu dilyn y llwybr yr oedd Plaid Cymru yn ei amlinellu, yna byddai gennym ni fwlch rheoleiddio a'r sefyllfa y soniodd Janet Finch-Saunders amdani: byddem wedi gweld glaniadau yma yng Nghymru na fyddem wedi gallu eu stopio tra bod gennym ni fwlch rheoleiddiol. Felly, gan mai Bil Aelod preifat oedd hwn, mae'n gwneud llawer iawn o synnwyr i gyd-fynd â'r broses reoleiddio i wneud yn siŵr nad oes bwlch. Rwy'n cytuno'n llwyr mai dyna'r peth iawn i'w wneud ac rwy'n galw'n daer ar i Aelodau gefnogi hyn heddiw. Fodd bynnag, byddaf yn dweud y byddai'n llawer gwell pe bai Llywodraeth y DU yn ymgynghori'n iawn â ni yn y broses o wneud hyn. Byddem yn gallu dod i gasgliadau llawer gwell gyda'n gilydd nag yr ydym yn ei wneud pan fyddwn yn darganfod pethau'r diwrnod cynt. Felly, er fy mod yn cytuno'n llwyr â mewnforio'r Bil hwn, nid yw'r ffordd y gwnaethon ni ddod i wybod amdano gan Lywodraeth y DU yn ddelfrydol. Felly, os hoffech chi anfon y neges honno'n ôl, Janet, byddai hynny o gymorth mawr yn wir. Ond i grynhoi, dirprwy Lywydd, anfonodd y Bil neges glir i weddill y byd nad ydym yn cefnogi'r arfer hon o bysgota, sydd mor niweidiol i boblogaethau siarcod y byd. Rwy'n cynnig y cynnig felly ac yn gofyn i bob Aelod ei gefnogi. Diolch.