English: [Continues.] - the universal credit that is going to see people without money for six weeks to be dismissed by a Prime Minister, when she was interviewed on that principle, saying, 'We'll work something out'. Well, I'm glad that she can work something out, because I know one thing: when you have no money whatsoever for six weeks to feed yourself, to pay your rent, or to send your children anywhere, you will not manage and you will not be able to work anything out. So, in terms of the protection of the £1 million for the discretionary assistance fund, which is only really a stitch, but a critical stitch and safety net, which was scrapped by the Tories in England and restored by a previous Welsh Labour Government, I welcome that and I wonder how many people that will support. The other issue that I am more than pleased about is - . And I was a former Pembrokeshire county councillor, and I do have an inside track record on the long and the dubious history of the toll on the Cleddau bridge, so I welcome scrapping that. And there is a history about how that money was both raised and how it was spent. So, looking ahead, I welcome, in the first place, the fact that that local tax will be removed - removed from the people who go to and from work, and from the businesses that operate either side of the county. I do appreciate that time is needed to make transitionary arrangements, but given that the council can budget knowing that maintenance costs will transfer to Welsh Government in two years' time, given the historic question of how the revenue has been spent over the years, do you think that it might be a good idea, even a gesture of goodwill, if Pembrokeshire council were to ring-fence the toll revenue from now until it's scrapped and consult ratepayers as to how that money should be spent? This has been a huge area that has been contested by myself and other Labour leaders on Pembrokeshire County Council year in and year out. I look forward to your response.
Welsh: [Yn parhau.] - y credyd cynhwysol sy'n mynd i adael pobl heb arian am chwe wythnos, ac i'r Prif Weinidog, pan gafodd ei chyfweld ar yr egwyddor honno, wfftio at hynny gan ddweud, 'Fe ddown ni i ryw drefniant'. Wel, rwy'n falch y gall hi ddod i ryw drefniant, oherwydd fe wn i un peth: pan nad oes gennych chi arian o gwbl am chwe wythnos i fwydo eich hun, i dalu eich rhent, neu i anfon eich plant i unrhyw le, ni fyddwch yn medru ymdopi ac ni fyddwch yn gallu dod i ryw drefniant. Felly, o ran diogelu'r £1 miliwn ar gyfer y gronfa cymorth dewisol, sydd mewn gwirionedd yn ddim ond elfen fechan iawn, ond yn elfen hanfodol ac yn rhwyd ddiogelwch, a gafodd ei diddymu gan y Torïaid yn Lloegr ac a adferwyd gan Lywodraeth Lafur flaenorol yng Nghymru, croesawaf hynny ac rwy'n meddwl tybed faint o bobl a gaiff eu cefnogi gan hynny. Y mater arall yr wyf yn fwy na bodlon yn ei gylch yw - . Ac roeddwn yn gyn-gynghorydd sir yn Sir Benfro, ac wedi hen arfer â hanes hir ac amheus y doll ar bont Cleddau, felly rwy'n croesawu diddymu honno. Ac mae hanes ynglŷn â sut y codwyd yr arian hwnnw a sut y cafodd ei wario. Felly, wrth edrych ymlaen, croesawaf, yn y lle cyntaf, y ffaith na fydd yn rhaid i'r bobl sy'n teithio i'w gwaith ac yn ôl, na'r busnesau sy'n gweithredu ar y naill ochr neu'r llall i'r sir dalu'r dreth leol honno. Rwyf yn gwerthfawrogi bod angen amser i wneud trefniadau pontio, ond o ystyried y gall y cyngor lunio cyllideb yn gwybod y caiff costau cynnal a chadw eu trosglwyddo i Lywodraeth Cymru mewn dwy flynedd, o ystyried y cwestiwn hanesyddol o sut y gwariwyd yr arian dros y blynyddoedd, ydych chi'n meddwl y gallai fod yn syniad da, hyd yn oed yn arwydd o ewyllys da, pe byddai cyngor Sir Benfro yn diogelu'r refeniw doll o nawr tan ei fod wedi'i ddiddymu ac ymgynghori â threthdalwyr ynghylch sut y dylid gwario'r arian hwnnw? Bu hwn yn faes enfawr yr wyf i ac arweinwyr Llafur eraill ar Gyngor Sir Benfro wedi dadlau yn ei gylch flwyddyn ar ôl a blwyddyn. Edrychaf ymlaen at eich ymateb.