English: Can I draw the leader of the house's attention to the fact that today we established a cross-party group on gambling in the Assembly, and ask her to consider a Government debate on gambling? We've just had the Gambling Commission proposals around fixed-odds betting terminals, which surprised many of us who expected the upper limit to be much lower than the £30 that has been proposed. It surprised the market as well, because the betting companies' stocks and shares immediately went up. They were obviously expecting a much more rigorous regulation than we've got. The latest survey of problem gambling in Wales has identified that 4.5 per cent of Welsh males have what could be considered to be problems with gambling. Now, that's a figure that will grow. It's been identified by the chief medical officer as a public health issue for Wales, so I think a debate - we've had a backbench debate, but I think a Government debate on gambling would be apposite. In that debate, I would like to understand exactly what powers the Government is likely to get over devolution. It was pitched as devolution of powers to stop the proliferation of fixed-odds betting terminals, but I think it only relates to a certain sum of money - I think £10 is the stake that's been mentioned. Clearly, if the Gambling Commission then changed the stake level then the devolution settlement looks a bit strange. We've pitched it at one sum, and then the Gambling Commission can change the sum, so it doesn't look like a very good devolution settlement to me. But it would be good to understand what the Government intends to do with these powers, and also the relationship of the Welsh Government to the Gambling Commission itself. I've had interactions with many UK bodies over the years who, over the last five years in particular, have made more of an effort to involve and to talk to Assembly Members, and to realise that they represent Wales when they represent the UK, or England and Wales. The Gambling Commission is a UK body that is supposed to have interaction with Wales, but I'm not aware - it certainly hasn't talked to Assembly Members, and I think it would be interesting to know what relationship the Government has. Can the Government nominate a member of the Gambling Commission itself, for example, or does it have any formal relationship like that? So, I think a debate on gambling would be really interesting for Members, but I think also very pertinent to the acquisition of the new powers and to consider how we might use them. The second thing I'd like to ask for is a simple statement, if we may. We've had the Brexit agreement announced yesterday between David Davis and Michel Barnier. We've seen the details of that. I don't want to go into a debate now on that - we have the Bills that we're discussing as well; we've had enough of that, perhaps. But, of course, there is still, in that agreement, the potential that the whole of the island of Ireland will remain in a customs union and single market. That pushes the border straight into Holyhead in particular, but the rest of Wales as well. There are huge implications for Wales in that. I'd just like to ask for the Welsh Government to give us a written statement, probably, setting out what the Welsh Government's interpretation and thoughts are regarding that. What are the implications for us? What do we need to prepare for? I think that's just a simple factual one to know that you have considered these issues and are prepared to, if necessary, act on them with the UK Government. And finally, if I may, you'll have seen that today has revealed that the two founding members of New Directions, who have got the contract for supply teachers in Wales, have made nearly £1 million between them. You might wonder how on earth you can make £1 million in two years out of supply teaching. Well, I'll tell you how: you charge £1,250 for four and a half days for a history teacher, and then you pay the history teacher £130 a day. That's how you make £1 million out of supply teaching. We really should not have any profit made in supply teaching in Wales. It is completely wrong that public money is going to profit from supply teaching. There is an alternative - an alternative of a co-operative supply teaching agency, or a local authority-run supply teaching agency as, for example, food standards are held within the local authority. The previous education Minister talked about that but did nothing about it. This Government has talked about it several times but has done nothing about it. Surely it's time to draw the line under any profit from supply teachers. Just introduce some quick and easy legislation, which I think we'll support, to outlaw these practices.
Welsh: A gaf i dynnu sylw arweinydd y tŷ at y ffaith ein bod heddiw wedi sefydlu grŵp trawsbleidiol ar hapchwarae yn y Cynulliad, a gofyn iddi ystyried dadl gan y Llywodraeth ar hapchwarae? Rydym newydd gael cynigion y Comisiwn Hapchwarae ynghylch terfynellau betio ods penodedig, ac fe synnwyd llawer ohonom a oedd yn disgwyl i'r terfyn uchaf fod yn is o lawer na'r £30 a gynigiwyd. Cafodd y farchnad ei synnu hefyd, oherwydd cododd stociau a chyfranddaliadau'r cwmnïau betio ar unwaith. Roeddynt yn amlwg yn disgwyl rheoliad llawer mwy llym na'r hyn sydd gennym. Nododd yr arolwg diweddaraf o broblemau gamblo yng Nghymru bod gan 4.5 y cant o ddynion Cymru yr hyn y gellid ei ystyried yn broblem hapchwarae. Nawr, mae hwnnw'n ffigur a fydd yn codi. Nodwyd gan y Prif Swyddog Meddygol bod hwn yn fater iechyd y cyhoedd i Gymru, felly credaf y byddai dadl - rydym wedi cael dadl meinciau cefn, ond credaf y byddai dadl gan y Llywodraeth ar hapchwarae yn briodol. Yn y ddadl honno, hoffwn wybod yn union pa bwerau dros ddatganoli y mae'r Llywodraeth yn debygol o'u cael. Cafodd ei gynnig fel datganoli pwerau i atal ymlediad y terfynellau betio ods penodedig, ond credaf nad yw'n ond yn ymwneud â swm penodol o arian - rwy'n credu mai £10 yw'r arian betio sydd wedi'i grybwyll. Yn amlwg, petai'r Comisiwn Hapchwarae wedyn yn newid lefel yr arian fe fyddai'r setliad datganoli yn edrych ychydig yn rhyfedd. Rydym wedi ei gyflwyno fel un swm, ac yna mae'r Comisiwn Hapchwarae yn gallu newid y swm, felly nid yw'n ymddangos fel setliad datganoli da iawn i mi. Ond byddai'n dda cael deall beth y mae'r Llywodraeth yn bwriadu ei wneud â'r pwerau hyn, a hefyd beth yw'r berthynas rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru a'r Comisiwn Hapchwarae ei hun. Rwyf wedi rhyngweithio â llawer o gyrff yn y DU dros y blynyddoedd, a dros y pum mlynedd diwethaf yn enwedig, maen nhw wedi gwneud mwy o ymdrech i gynnwys Aelodau'r Cynulliad ac i siarad â nhw, ac i sylweddoli eu bod yn cynrychioli Cymru pan fyddant yn cynrychioli'r DU, neu Gymru a Lloegr. Corff y DU yw'r Comisiwn Hapchwarae sydd i fod i ryngweithio â Chymru, ond nid wyf yn ymwybodol - yn sicr nid yw wedi siarad ag Aelodau'r Cynulliad, a chredaf y byddai'n ddiddorol gwybod pa berthynas sydd ganddo â'r Llywodraeth. A all y Llywodraeth enwebu aelod o'r Comisiwn Hapchwarae ei hun, er enghraifft, neu a oes ganddo unrhyw berthynas ffurfiol fel hynny? Felly, rwy'n credu y byddai dadl ar hapchwarae yn ddiddorol iawn i Aelodau, ond rwy'n credu hefyd y byddai'n berthnasol iawn i'r broses o gaffael y pwerau newydd a sut y gellid eu defnyddio. Yr ail beth yr hoffwn i ofyn amdano, os caf i, yw datganiad syml. Ddoe, cyhoeddwyd y cytundeb Brexit rhwng David Davis a Michel Barnier. Rydym wedi gweld y manylion ynglŷn â hwnnw. Dwi ddim eisiau dadlau am hwnnw nawr - mae gennym y Biliau yr ydym yn eu trafod hefyd; yr ydym wedi cael digon o hynny, efallai. Ond, wrth gwrs, erys yn y cytundeb hwnnw, y posibilrwydd y bydd Ynys Iwerddon gyfan yn parhau mewn undeb tollau a marchnad sengl. Byddai hynny'n gwthio'r ffin yn syth i Gaergybi yn benodol, ond i weddill Cymru hefyd. Golyga hyn oblygiadau enfawr i Gymru. Hoffwn ofyn i Lywodraeth Cymru roi datganiad ysgrifenedig inni, yn nodi, mae'n debyg, beth yw dehongliad a syniadau Llywodraeth Cymru ynghylch hynny. Beth yw'r goblygiadau i ni? Ar gyfer beth y dylem ni baratoi? Rwy'n credu ei fod yn gwestiwn syml a ffeithiol i gael gwybod eich bod wedi ystyried y materion hyn a'ch bod yn barod i, os oes angen, weithredu arnyn nhw gyda Llywodraeth y DU. Ac yn olaf, os caf i, byddwch yn gwybod y datgelwyd heddiw bod y ddau aelod sylfaenol o New Directions, sydd â chytundeb ar gyfer athrawon cyflenwi yng Nghymru, wedi gwneud bron i £1 miliwn rhyngddynt. Efallai eich bod yn meddwl sut ar y ddaear y gallwch wneud £1 miliwn mewn dwy flynedd drwy ddarparu athrawon cyflenwi. Wel, fe ddywedaf i wrthych chi sut: rydych yn codi £1,250 am athro hanes dros bedwar diwrnod a hanner, ac wedyn rydych yn talu £130 y dydd i'r athro hanes. Dyna sut yr ydych chi'n gwneud £1 miliwn drwy ddarparu athrawon cyflenwi. Ni ddylid gwneud unrhyw elw ar ddarparu athrawon cyflenwi yng Nghymru. Mae'n gwbl anghywir bod arian cyhoeddus yn creu elw ar ddarparu athrawon cyflenwi. Mae yna ddewis arall - y dewis hwnnw yw asiantaeth athrawon cyflenwi gydweithredol, neu asiantaeth athrawon cyflenwi sy'n cael ei rhedeg gan awdurdod lleol fel, er enghraifft y mae safonau bwyd yn dod o dan yr awdurdod lleol. Soniodd y Gweinidog addysg blaenorol am hynny ond ni wnaeth dim ynglŷn ag ef. Mae'r Llywodraeth hon wedi sôn amdano droeon ond wedi gwneud dim ynglŷn ag ef. Yn sicr mae'n bryd tynnu llinell o dan unrhyw elw a wneir ar ddarparu athrawon cyflenwi. Cyflwynwch ddeddfwriaeth gyflym a hawdd, y credaf y byddwn ni'n ei chefnogi, i wahardd yr arferion hyn.