English: We always welcome any new thinking in economic strategy and the Cabinet Secretary will be aware that I'm myself trying to engage positively with him. It's in all of our interests that, actually, the high-level goals at the heart of any economic strategy are achieved. But, I have to say, if what we get is an ever lengthening series of vague statements, that initial enthusiasm, that there is a genuine paradigm shift in thinking here, will soon be dissipated, and what we were left with is a growing sense that what this is is an economic inaction plan. Can I ask him - ? There was precious little detail really in the statement that he just read out or in the press release. Is there anything more than that? Is there more detail in documents around the calls to action, on the economic contract, and on the economy futures fund? And, if those documents exist, why haven't we got them, so that we can ask more intelligent questions of you? I think our own Standing Orders, actually, dictate that if a statement refers to Government documents then they must be provided for all Members. Now, I've seen Labour Members, actually, with some glossy document on the economic action plan, which the Cabinet Secretary may be about to hold up. Well, maybe he can confirm that an advance copy wasn't given to Labour Members in the Labour group meeting, because that would be, absolutely, an abuse of Government resources. We need all Members to be involved in the development of Government policy. In terms of the detail of what he said, the cross-Government delivery board that he mentioned - can he just explain to me how is that different to, or is that taking the place of, the strategic delivery and performance board that, certainly up until recently, I think the Permanent Secretary chaired? And how is it different to the delivery unit, the First Minister's delivery unit, which was launched with a great fanfare in 2011 and then sort of disappeared with a whimper in 2016? Isn't there a danger that we've been here before? And where's the sense of urgency, Cabinet Secretary, in what you've said today and what you've said previously? There are great opportunities: the lowest interest rates in history, a massive increase - you've got to applaud the UK Government - in terms of research and development, the biggest R&D investment that we've ever seen across the UK, and all the potential in terms of technology, industry 4.0. Are we grasping that, and where's the urgency in what he has said? And, indeed, on measurement as well, how can we get the critical challenge that he referred to in terms of the ministerial advisory board if we're not clear what we are measuring? Finally, the First Minister earlier said that the Public Accounts Committee report was a serious report, and there will be an opportunity for the Government to respond in full, but it does say that the project 'created a strong impression to the committee of a department' - his department - 'which was not properly in control of its business'. Are the changes that the Cabinet Secretary has announced today a candid admission that this was a dysfunctional department, and isn't the first step in changing that an admission of previous failure?
Welsh: Rydym bob amser yn croesawu unrhyw syniadau newydd mewn strategaeth economaidd a bydd Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn ymwybodol fy mod i fy hun yn ceisio ymgysylltu'n gadarnhaol gydag ef. Mae er lles pob un ohonom ni, yn wir, y cyflawnir y nodau lefel uchel sydd wrth wraidd unrhyw strategaeth economaidd. Ond, mae'n rhaid imi ddweud, os mai'r hyn a gawn yw ymestyniad parhaus o gyfres o ddatganiadau annelwig, bydd y brwdfrydedd cychwynnol hwnnw, bod newid patrwm gwirioneddol yn y ffordd o feddwl yma, yn mynd ar ddisberod yn fuan iawn, a'r hyn fyddai ar ôl yw ymdeimlad cynyddol mai cynllun segurdod economaidd yw hwn. A gaf i ofyn iddo - ? Nid oedd fawr ddim manylion mewn gwirionedd yn y datganiad a ddarllenodd nac yn y datganiad i'r wasg. A oes unrhyw beth mwy na hynny? A oes mwy o fanylion yn y dogfennau ynghylch yr alwad i weithredu, ar y contract economaidd, ac ynglŷn â chronfa economi y dyfodol? Ac, os yw'r dogfennau hynny yn bodoli, pam nad ydyn nhw gyda ni, fel y gallwn ofyn cwestiynau mwy deallus ichi? Rwy'n credu bod ein Rheolau Sefydlog ein hunain, mewn gwirionedd, yn mynnu os yw datganiad yn cyfeirio at ddogfennau Llywodraeth yna rhaid eu darparu i'r holl Aelodau. Nawr, rwyf wedi gweld bod gan yr Aelodau Llafur, yn wir, ryw ddogfen sgleiniog ynglŷn â'r cynllun gweithredu economaidd, y gallai Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet o bosibl ei chodi. Wel, efallai y gall gadarnhau na roddwyd copi ymlaen llaw i'r Aelodau Llafur yng nghyfarfod y grŵp Llafur, oherwydd y byddai hynny, yn wir, yn gamddefnydd o adnoddau'r Llywodraeth. Mae angen i bawb ohonom fod yn rhan o ddatblygiad polisi'r Llywodraeth. O ran manylion yr hyn a ddywedodd, y bwrdd cyflawni trawslywodraethol a grybwyllodd - a all esbonio i mi sut mae hynny'n wahanol i, neu a yw'n disodli, y bwrdd cyflawni a pherfformio strategol, a oedd, yn sicr hyd yn ddiweddar, yn cael ei gadeirio gan yr Ysgrifennydd Parhaol? A sut mae'n wahanol i'r uned gyflawni, uned gyflawni Prif Weinidog Cymru, a lansiwyd gyda ffanffer mawr yn 2011 ac yna a ddiflannodd, gydag ochenaid, yn 2016? Onid oes perygl ein bod ni wedi gwneud hyn i gyd o'r blaen? A ble mae'r ymdeimlad o frys, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, yn yr hyn yr ydych chi wedi'i ddweud heddiw a beth yr ydych wedi ei ddweud o'r blaen? Mae cyfleoedd gwych: y cyfraddau llog isaf mewn hanes, cynnydd enfawr - mae'n rhaid ichi ganmol Llywodraeth y DU - o ran ymchwil a datblygu, y buddsoddiad ymchwil a datblygu mwyaf a welsom ni erioed yn y DU, a'r holl bosibiliadau o ran technoleg, diwydiant 4.0. A ydym yn deall hynny, a ble mae'r brys o ran beth a ddywedodd? Ac, yn wir, ynglŷn â mesur hefyd, sut allwn ni gael yr her allweddol y cyfeiriodd ato o ran y bwrdd cynghori gweinidogol os nad ydym yn glir beth yr ydym ni yn ei fesur? Yn olaf, dywedodd y Prif Weinidog yn gynharach fod adroddiad y Pwyllgor Cyfrifon Cyhoeddus yn adroddiad difrifol, ac y bydd cyfle i'r Llywodraeth ymateb yn llawn. Ond dywed fod y prosiect wedi creu 'argraff gref ar y Pwyllgor o adran' - ei adran ef - 'nad oedd ganddi reolaeth briodol dros ei busnes'. A yw'r newidiadau a gyhoeddwyd gan Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet heddiw yn gyfaddefiad gonest fod hon yn adran nad yw'n gweithio fel y dylai, ac onid y cam cyntaf ar gyfer newid hynny yw cyfaddefiad o fethiant blaenorol?