English: Can I say I was greatly moved - I was still at school, actually - when the Brandt commission reported? I know this will not recommend it any further to a certain party but, of course, Edward Heath was one of its prime members. It established the 0.7 per cent target of GNP that should be devoted to international aid. As part of that report, it also emphasised, to respond directly to Neil Hamilton, that it wasn't aid that was the most important thing - though it was a vital thing in transforming people's lives in the poorest countries - but it was trade that was at the heart of a more just international order. That had a big effect in the 1980s in the GATT rounds, which first broke through, really, the old protectionist systems that had largely held force since the second world war. That itself then led on to the World Trade Organization, which has opened up and transformed international trading, and that's why the Christian Aid figures that Steffan quoted earlier about massive reductions in world poverty - . When you look at absolute poverty, the reductions are even more astonishing. I know that UKIP, to be fair, are very consistent on this. They deplore what's happened in terms of the global economy, as well, but it has liberated hundreds of millions of people, because we have a more effective trading system now, internationally. So, it's trade and aid - that's what leads to a just international society. I have to say, Deputy Presiding Officer, that, in the early 1990s, I was responsible for UNICEF's education work in Wales, and, as part of that, I did visit some projects. I remember the technical assistance I saw in Brazil that was given to street children, particularly in Fortaleza, one of the poorer cities in Brazil then, as now - very close to the equator. I saw a street children project there where the children were helped by UNICEF to run a communal living arrangement, and then the children went out and performed a street circus. Fortaleza is very popular with North American tourists, and these children earned a decent living. Now, if they hadn't earned a decent and legal living, they were vulnerable to vigilante gangs coming along and murdering them, and it was very important, in particular, that the adolescent children could show society that they were in productive employment. Because, you may give money - and Neil has talked about giving your own money and I'm sure that many people in this Chamber do that and keep that a private thing - to a street child of five or six years of age on a street corner, but let me tell you, you're less likely to give a 14-year-old or 15-year-old youth on the corner, but perhaps in equal poverty, that assistance. So, the technical assistance I saw was just remarkable. I also saw a project in Thailand that helped sex workers, and the liberation that that brought them was deeply moving. There was a conference attached to the work that we were viewing there and I was given a briefcase for the conference with a beautiful textile pattern on the front of it, and I used that briefcase for many years when I was first elected to the Assembly. It was very distinctive and I was very proud to tell people when they asked, 'Where did you get that case?' So, I think it's very important that we set this in context. I am proud that a British Government with cross-party support, if not all-party support, has implemented the 0.7 per cent target. It is something that we should be very, very proud of and that we want to see. We are a leader and other countries are following our example, albeit too slowly. In the last five or six years, the Department for International Development budget has led to 69.5 million people gaining access to financial services to help them work their way out of poverty. That's things like microloans to women in Bangladesh. You know, it's not all about giving immediate aid; it's about investing in the future: 11.3 million children are in primary and lower secondary schools, nearly half of them girls, because of our budget; we have helped support nearly 400,000 teachers; since 2010, over 67 million children have been immunised because of our people's money, if I could put it that way, through Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. Many of those children would not be alive today if that assistance had not been given. We stand proud of what we've achieved and we want to go further. I think Julie Morgan made reference to the audit procedures. They're even more robust than Julie had time, actually, to indicate. In the last audit, 0.3 per cent of DFID spending was reported as lost to fraud, of which two thirds was then recovered. So, we lost in the budget 0.01 per cent, and I think that's what we've got to remember - that we have rigorous procedures. Can I conclude, Deputy Presiding Officer? Britain has been part of the solution in this area. Let's now not become part of the problem. Reject this shabby motion.
Welsh: A gaf fi ddweud fy mod wedi fy nghyffroi'n fawr - roeddwn yn dal i fod yn yr ysgol mewn gwirionedd - pan gyflwynodd comisiwn Brandt eu hadroddiad? Rwy'n gwybod na fydd hyn yn ei wneud ronyn yn fwy apelgar i blaid benodol ond wrth gwrs, Edward Heath oedd un o'i brif aelodau. Sefydlodd y comisiwn y targed o 0.7 o'r cynnyrch gwladol gros y dylid ei neilltuo ar gyfer cymorth rhyngwladol. Fel rhan o'r adroddiad hwnnw, roedd hefyd yn pwysleisio, er mwyn ymateb yn uniongyrchol i Neil Hamilton, nad cymorth oedd y peth pwysicaf - er ei fod yn beth hanfodol ar gyfer trawsnewid bywydau pobl yn y gwledydd tlotaf - ond masnach oedd yn ganolog i drefn ryngwladol fwy cyfiawn. Cafodd hynny effaith fawr yn y 1980au ar rowndiau'r Cytundeb Cyffredinol ar Dariffau a Masnach, a dorrodd yn gyntaf mewn gwirionedd drwy'r hen systemau diffyndollol a oedd wedi cynnal grym i raddau helaeth ers yr ail ryfel byd. Arweiniodd hynny ynddo'i hun wedyn at Sefydliad Masnach y Byd, sydd wedi agor a thrawsnewid masnachu rhyngwladol, a dyna pam y mae ffigurau Cymorth Cristnogol a ddyfynnodd Steffan yn gynharach am ostyngiadau enfawr yn lefelau tlodi'r byd - . Pan edrychwch ar dlodi absoliwt, mae'r gostyngiadau hyd yn oed yn fwy rhyfeddol. Gwn fod UKIP, a bod yn deg, yn gyson iawn ar hyn. Mae'n gas ganddynt beth sydd wedi digwydd i'r economi fyd-eang, yn ogystal, ond mae wedi rhyddhau cannoedd o filiynau o bobl, gan fod gennym system fasnachu fwy effeithiol erbyn hyn, yn rhyngwladol. Felly, masnach a chymorth - dyna sy'n arwain at gymdeithas ryngwladol gyfiawn. Rhaid i mi ddweud, Dirprwy Lywydd, fy mod yn gyfrifol am waith addysg UNICEF yng Nghymru yn y 1990au cynnar, ac yn rhan o hynny, ymwelais â rhai o'r prosiectau. Rwy'n cofio'r cymorth technegol a welais ym Mrasil a gâi ei roi i blant y stryd, yn enwedig yn Fortaleza, un o'r dinasoedd tlotaf ym Mrasil bryd hynny, fel yn awr - yn agos iawn at y cyhydedd. Gwelais brosiect plant y stryd yno lle câi'r plant eu helpu gan UNICEF i weithredu trefniant byw cymunedol, ac yna byddai'r plant yn mynd allan ac yn perfformio syrcas stryd. Mae Fortaleza yn boblogaidd iawn gyda thwristiaid o Ogledd America, ac roedd y plant hyn yn ennill bywoliaeth weddus. Nawr, pe na baent yn ennill bywoliaeth weddus a chyfreithiol, roeddent yn agored i gael eu llofruddio gan gangiau vigilante, ac roedd yn bwysig iawn fod plant yn eu harddegau, yn arbennig, yn gallu dangos i gymdeithas eu bod mewn cyflogaeth gynhyrchiol. Oherwydd, efallai y gallwch roi arian - ac mae Neil wedi sôn am roi eich arian eich hun ac rwy'n siŵr fod llawer o bobl yn y Siambr hon yn gwneud hynny ac yn cadw hynny'n beth preifat - i blentyn y stryd sy'n bump neu'n chwech oed ar gornel stryd, ond gadewch i mi ddweud wrthych, rydych yn llai tebygol o roi'r un cymorth i unigolyn ifanc 14 neu 15 oed ar y gornel, ond sydd yr un mor dlawd o bosibl. Felly, roedd y cymorth technegol a welais yn gwbl ryfeddol. Hefyd gwelais brosiect yng Ngwlad Thai a oedd yn helpu gweithwyr rhyw, a gwnaeth y rhyddid roedd hynny'n ei roi iddynt argraff fawr arnaf. Roedd cynhadledd ynghlwm wrth y gwaith a welsom yno a chefais fag gwaith ar gyfer y gynhadledd gyda phatrwm tecstilau hardd ar ei flaen, a defnyddiais y bag gwaith am nifer o flynyddoedd pan gefais fy ethol gyntaf i'r Cynulliad. Roedd yn arbennig iawn ac roeddwn yn falch iawn o ddweud wrth bobl pan fyddent yn gofyn, 'O ble y cawsoch chi'r bag?' Felly, rwy'n meddwl ei bod yn bwysig iawn inni osod hyn mewn cyd-destun. Rwy'n falch fod Llywodraeth Prydain gyda chefnogaeth drawsbleidiol, os nad cefnogaeth pob plaid, wedi gweithredu'r targed o 0.7 y cant. Mae'n rhywbeth y dylem fod yn falch iawn ohono ac eisiau ei weld. Rydym yn arwain ac mae gwledydd eraill yn dilyn ein hesiampl, er yn rhy araf. Yn ystod y pum neu chwe blynedd diwethaf, mae cyllideb yr Adran dros Ddatblygu Rhyngwladol wedi arwain at roi gwasanaethau ariannol i 69.5 miliwn o bobl i'w helpu i weithio eu ffordd allan o dlodi. Dyna bethau fel microfenthyciadau i fenywod ym Mangladesh. Wyddoch chi, nid yw'r cyfan yn ymwneud â rhoi cymorth ar unwaith; mae'n ymwneud â buddsoddi yn y dyfodol: mae 11.3 miliwn o blant mewn ysgolion cynradd ac uwchradd iau, a bron eu hanner yn ferched, oherwydd ein cyllideb; rydym wedi helpu i gynnal bron i 400,000 o athrawon; ers 2010, mae dros 67 miliwn o blant wedi cael eu himiwneiddio oherwydd arian ein pobl, os caf ei roi felly, drwy Gavi, y Gynghrair Frechu. Ni fyddai llawer o'r plant hyn yn fyw heddiw pe na bai'r cymorth wedi'i roi. Rydym yn falch o'r hyn a gyflawnwyd gennym ac rydym am fynd ymhellach. Rwy'n meddwl bod Julie Morgan wedi cyfeirio at y gweithdrefnau archwilio. Maent hyd yn oed yn fwy cadarn nag y cafodd Julie amser i nodi, mewn gwirionedd. Yn yr archwiliad diwethaf, adroddwyd bod 0.3 y cant o wariant yr Adran dros Ddatblygu Rhyngwladol wedi'i golli drwy dwyll, a chafodd dwy ran o dair ohono ei adfer wedyn. Felly, collwyd 0.01 y cant o'r gyllideb, ac rwy'n meddwl mai dyna sy'n rhaid i ni ei gofio - fod gennym weithdrefnau trwyadl. A gaf fi gloi, Dirprwy Lywydd? Mae Prydain wedi bod yn rhan o'r ateb yn y maes hwn. Gadewch i ni beidio â mynd yn rhan o'r broblem yn awr. Gwrthodwch y cynnig tila hwn.