English: There were five questions in that set of interventions. The first is about the actions of the Prime Minister. They were decided by the Supreme Court to be unlawful. The second point that she made is my assessment of the impact of the recent legislation around a 'no deal' Brexit. I'm afraid I won't share, in accordance with the Counsel General's convention, my advice to the Welsh Government in relation to that. She asked me for the proof that I have that the Prime Minister intends to act unlawfully. Well, I have access to the same information that any other Member has, which is the Prime Minister's repeated assertion that we will leave the European Union on 31 October whether that is with a deal or no deal. The Act requires something other than that. So, continuing to assert that appears to put him at odds with the requirement of the legislation. She asked what arrangements we have made to inform people of our actions in relation to shortages. Well, obviously, we've published a 'no deal' action plan, and we're giving statements today. Lastly, she asked me about the impact, or the risks, of not respecting - as I think she would put it - the referendum. Let me just say this in relation to that last point: we don't take lightly the fact that the 2016 referendum concluded what it did conclude. We spent an awful lot of time seeking to advocate for a version of Brexit that did the least possible damage to Wales, the Welsh economy and our communities. That failed in Parliament because of the Tory leadership contest. In effect, it brought that to an end. So, we have been clear that the solution to the situation that we are in is to seek a referendum. I regard that as a democratic event in itself.
Welsh: Roedd pum cwestiwn yn y gyfres honno o ymyriadau. Mae'r cyntaf yn ymwneud â gweithredoedd Prif Weinidog y DU. Penderfynodd y Goruchaf Lys eu bod yn anghyfreithlon. Roedd yr ail sylw a wnaeth ynghylch fy asesiad o effaith y ddeddfwriaeth ddiweddar ynghylch Brexit heb gytundeb. Rwy'n ofni na fyddaf yn rhannu, yn unol â chonfensiwn y Cwnsler Cyffredinol, fy nghyngor i Lywodraeth Cymru mewn perthynas â hynny. Gofynnodd imi am y dystiolaeth sydd gennyf fod Prif Weinidog y DU yn bwriadu gweithredu'n anghyfreithlon. Wel, mae'r un wybodaeth ar gael imi ag sydd ar gael i unrhyw aelod arall, sef haeriad mynych y Prif Weinidog y byddwn yn gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd ar 31 Hydref, boed hynny gyda chytundeb neu heb gytundeb. Mae'r Ddeddf yn gofyn am rywbeth heblaw hynny. Felly, drwy barhau i haeru hynny ymddengys ei fod yn tynnu'n groes i ofynion y ddeddfwriaeth. Gofynnodd pa drefniadau ydym ni wedi'u gwneud i roi gwybod i bobl am ein camau gweithredu mewn perthynas â phrinder. Wel, yn amlwg, rydym ni wedi cyhoeddi cynllun gweithredu ar gyfer Brexit heb gytundeb, ac rydym ni'n gwneud datganiadau heddiw. Yn olaf, gofynnodd imi am effaith, neu beryglon, peidio â pharchu - fel y credaf y byddai'n dweud - y refferendwm. Gadewch imi ddweud hyn mewn perthynas â'r sylw olaf hwnnw: nid ydym yn wfftio'r ffaith bod canlyniad refferendwm 2016 gyfryw ag ydoedd. Fe wnaethom ni dreulio amser maith yn ceisio eiriol dros fath o Brexit a wnai'r difrod lleiaf posib i Gymru, i economi Cymru ac i'n cymunedau. Methodd hynny yn y Senedd oherwydd yr ornest i arwain y Torïaid. I bob diben, daeth â hynny i ben. Felly, rydym ni wedi bod yn glir mai'r ateb i'r sefyllfa yr ydym ni ynddi yw ceisio refferendwm. Ystyriaf fod hynny'n ddigwyddiad democrataidd ynddo'i hun.