techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: With regard to 16 and 17-year-olds, I think there's a duty on political parties - perhaps not the most objective of sources - to provide information to voters, for them to decide how they should vote. I think the issue of constitutional education doesn't end at 17; it's there for people at all ages. They don't properly understand, quite often, the way that Government works, and why should they? It's not part of their everyday lives. So, I think, yes, we can look at the curriculum, but there is an obligation, I think, on us as politicians as well to engage with not just those 16-year-olds and 17-year-olds, but all ages. In terms of leasehold tenure, if you ask, 'Is it ruled out?', the answer is, 'No, it's not ruled out.' It's not, obviously, in this year's legislative programme, but nevertheless it is an issue that's still live as far as the Government is concerned. In terms of the equality Act, let me write to him on that, in terms of what we would need to do in order to implement section 1, and what the effects would be. I will write to him to provide him with an update on that issue.
Welsh: O ran pobl ifanc 16 ac 17 mlwydd oed, rwy'n credu bod dyletswydd ar bleidiau gwleidyddol - efallai nad y mwyaf diduedd o ffynonellau - i ddarparu gwybodaeth i bleidleiswyr, er mwyn iddyn nhw benderfynu sut y dylen nhw bleidleisio. Dydy mater addysg gyfansoddiadol ddim yn dod i ben yn 17 oed yn fy marn i; mae yno i bobl o bob oedran. Dydyn nhw ddim yn deall yn iawn, yn eithaf aml, sut y mae Llywodraeth yn gweithio, a pham ddylen nhw? Dydy e' ddim yn rhan o'u bywydau bob dydd. Felly, rwy'n credu, ie, gallwn ni edrych ar y cwricwlwm, ond mae yna rwymedigaeth, rwy'n credu, arnom ni fel gwleidyddion hefyd i ymgysylltu, nid yn unig â'r bobl ifanc 16 mlwydd oed ac 17 mlwydd oed, ond â phobl o bob oedran. O ran lesddeiliadaeth, os ydych chi'n gofyn, 'A yw'n cael ei diystyru?', yr ateb yw, 'Na, dydy hynny ddim yn cael ei ddiystyru.' Yn amlwg, dydy hynny ddim yn y rhaglen ddeddfwriaethol eleni, ond serch hynny mae'n fater sy'n dal yn fyw cyn belled ag y mae'r Llywodraeth yn y cwestiwn. O ran y Ddeddf Cydraddoldeb, gadewch imi ysgrifennu ato ar hynny, o ran beth y byddai angen ei wneud er mwyn gweithredu adran 1, a beth fyddai effeithiau hynny. Ysgrifennaf ato i roi'r diweddaraf ar y mater hwnnw iddo.
English: Well, there is a difference between us and England, because we do have the well-being of future generations Act, which, of course, much more broadly includes environmental principles. But there's no reason why we can't consider that during the next few months, because one of the things that isn't obvious is which Bills will be required. Will we need an agricultural Bill? Well, my answer to that is, 'We may need one.' But at the moment, it's difficult to say what that Bill would include. That's why, of course, there has been space created in the legislative programme to ensure that there is room to develop Brexit Bills. Instead of us announcing six or seven Bills this afternoon, there is scope for the legislative team, and the Bill teams, to develop Bills when they need to be made. So, the capacity is there to do that, as I said at the outset of the process. In terms of the vacant land tax, it's not something that is in this year's programme, but it's evidently something that the Minister is considering now. Of course, there will be more to be said on that again at a later stage.
Welsh: Wel, mae yna wahaniaeth rhyngom ni a Lloegr achos y ffaith bod gennym ni Ddeddf llesiant cenedlaethau'r dyfodol, sydd, wrth gwrs, yn cynnwys yn llawer mwy eang yr egwyddorion sydd yna ynglŷn â'r amgylchedd. Ond nid oes rheswm pam na allwn ni ystyried hwn yn ystod y misoedd nesaf, achos un o'r pethau sydd ddim yn amlwg yw pa Filiau fydd eu heisiau. A fydd eisiau Bil amaeth? Wel, yr ateb i hynny yw, 'Efallai bydd eisiau Bil amaeth.' Ond, ar hyn o bryd, mae'n anodd dweud beth fydd y Bil amaeth hwnnw'n cynnwys. Nawr, dyna pam, wrth gwrs, mae yna le wedi cael ei greu yn y rhaglen ddeddfwriaethol er mwyn sicrhau bod yna le yno i ddatblygu Biliau Brexit. Yn lle ein bod ni'n datgan chwech neu saith Mesur y prynhawn yma, mae yna le yno i'r cyfreithwyr, a hefyd i'r timau Biliau, i ddatblygu Biliau pan mae'r angen yn dod. Mae'r capasiti yno i wneud hynny, fel y dywedais i ar ddechrau'r broses. Ynglŷn â threth tir gwag, nid yw hynny'n rhywbeth sydd yn y rhaglen y flwyddyn hon, ond mae hyn yn amlwg yn rhywbeth y mae'r Gweinidog yn dal i ystyried. Wrth gwrs, fe fydd yna fwy i'w ddweud ynglŷn â hynny yn y pen draw.
English: Item 4 on the agenda this afternoon is the statement by the Cabinet Secretary for Finance: update on European transition. I call on the Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Mark Drakeford.
Welsh: Eitem 4 ar yr agenda y prynhawn yma yw datganiad gan Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Gyllid: Y wybodaeth ddiweddaraf am y trefniadau pontio Ewropeaidd. Galwaf ar Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Gyllid, Mark Drakeford.
English: The Member has had three and a half minutes, and I'm yet to hear a question to the Cabinet Secretary. Could we hear a question, please?
Welsh: Mae'r Aelod wedi cael tri munud a hanner, ac nid wyf wedi clywed cwestiwn i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet eto. A gawn ni glywed cwestiwn, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: That was also positive in terms of trade. Finally, given Liam Fox's statements yesterday in his capacity as international trade Secretary in terms of post-Brexit trade arrangements, when he set out his intention to boost trade with old friends and new allies, expanding access to markets across the globe, but also said that he was working closely with the devolved administrations, of course Governments and the Northern Ireland administration, on an ongoing basis to deliver an approach that works, as part of this concluding a series of collaborative policy round tables with devolved Governments, recognising the close interaction between trade policy and devolved policy areas, could he tell us a little bit more, please, about what was stated in that paper yesterday? Thank you.
Welsh: Roedd hynny hefyd yn gadarnhaol o ran masnach. Yn olaf, o ystyried datganiadau Liam Fox ddoe yn rhinwedd ei swydd yn Ysgrifennydd masnach ryngwladol o ran trefniadau masnach ar ôl Brexit, pan soniodd am ei fwriad i roi hwb i fasnach gyda hen gyfeillion a chynghreiriaid newydd, gan ehangu mynediad at farchnadoedd ledled y byd, ond pan ddywedodd hefyd ei fod yn parhau i weithio'n agos gyda'r gweinyddiaethau datganoledig, y Llywodraethau wrth gwrs a gweinyddiaeth Gogledd Iwerddon, i sefydlu trefn sy'n gweithio, yn rhan o hyn i gloi cyfres o drafodaethau polisi cydweithredol bord gron gyda'r llywodraethau datganoledig, gan gydnabod y berthynas agos rhwng polisi masnach a meysydd polisi datganoledig, a allai ddweud wrthym ni ychydig yn fwy, os gwelwch yn dda, am yr hyn a nodwyd yn y papur hwnnw ddoe? Diolch.
English: The Member's had nearly four minutes, and I haven't heard a question.
Welsh: Mae'r Aelod wedi cael bron i bedair munud, ac nid wyf wedi clywed cwestiwn.
English: Well, the questions are all implied, and I'm sure the Cabinet Secretary is sophisticated enough an audience to be able to answer them.
Welsh: Wel, mae'r cwestiynau i gyd ymhlŷg, ac rwy'n siŵr bod Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn ddigon soffistigedig i allu eu hateb.
English: No, no. This is a statement; you ask questions, please.
Welsh: Na na. Mae hwn yn ddatganiad; rydych chi'n gofyn cwestiynau, os gwelwch yn dda.
English: I can always end up by asking the Cabinet Secretary if he agrees with what I've said. But I will conclude, because I don't want to take up any more time than I have done. There are massive opportunities, as well as transitional problems, in leaving the EU. I wonder why the Cabinet Secretary doesn't see at least some glimmer of light in the options that are available to us with the freedoms that we would have if we even had a 'no deal' scenario. As Mark Isherwood pointed out, the Commonwealth is a massive force in the world economically, and growing. The United States under President Trump is clearly very favourably disposed towards the United Kingdom, and he sees the EU as the enemy and, indeed, they have been a hostile power to us in these negotiations. There are massive opportunities there for us, and whatever the transitional problems of leaving - nobody denies that change of this magnitude is going to produce difficulties - nevertheless there are massive opportunities for Britain to connect properly with the rest of the world through free trade deals. The limited effect of tariffs within Europe are massively outweighed by the trade opportunities elsewhere in the world, and President Trump has, for all his imperfections, shown that, in the art of the deal, he is a past master, and he has got for America what the people who voted for him wanted in casting their ballots. What the Conservative Government at Westminster have done is actually to deny the British people, 17.5 million of them, what they voted for in the referendum two years ago.
Welsh: Gallaf wastad orffen drwy ofyn i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet a yw'n cytuno gyda'r hyn a ddywedais i. Ond fe wnaf i gloi, oherwydd does arnaf i ddim eisiau cymryd mwy o amser nag yr wyf i wedi'i wneud. Mae cyfleoedd enfawr, yn ogystal â phroblemau pontio, wrth adael yr UE. Tybed pam nad yw Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn gweld y llygedyn lleiaf o oleuni yn y dewisiadau sydd ar gael i ni gyda'r rhyddid a fyddai gennym ni hyd yn oed mewn sefyllfa o 'ddim bargen'. Fel y nododd Mark Isherwood, mae'r Gymanwlad yn rym enfawr yn y byd economaidd, ac yn tyfu. Mae'r Unol Daleithiau o dan Arlywydd Trump yn amlwg yn ffafriol iawn tuag at y Deyrnas Unedig, ac mae yntau'n gweld yr UE fel gelyn, ac yn wir, maen nhw wedi bod yn elyniaethus i ni yn y trafodaethau hyn. Mae yna gyfleoedd enfawr ar gael i ni, a beth bynnag yw'r problemau pontio o ran gadael - does neb yn gwadu bod newid o'r maint hwn yn mynd i olygu anawsterau - serch hynny, mae cyfleoedd enfawr i Brydain gysylltu'n briodol â gweddill y byd trwy gytundebau masnach rhydd. Mae effaith gyfyngedig tariffau Ewrop yn llawer llai na'r cyfleoedd masnach mewn mannau eraill o'r byd, ac mae'r Arlywydd Trump, er gwaethaf ei holl ddiffygion, wedi dangos ei fod yn hen law, wrth daro bargen, a'i fod wedi cyflawni i America yr hyn yr oedd y bobl a bleidleisiodd o'i blaid yn ei ddymuno wrth fwrw eu pleidlais. Yr hyn y mae'r Llywodraeth Geidwadol yn San Steffan wedi ei wneud mewn gwirionedd yw amddifadu pobl Prydain, 17.5 miliwn ohonynt, o'r hyn y gwnaethon nhw bleidleisio drosto yn y refferendwm ddwy flynedd yn ôl.
English: Well, Dirprwy Lywydd, I suppose that no afternoon in which the Napoleonic code and Lord North both make an appearance on the Assembly floor is entirely wasted, but I'm afraid it was very much downhill from there on. The Member makes his normal pitch for the Brexit that he has favoured and the Brexit that he has persuaded to vote for, and where he is quite wrong is to characterise the position of the Welsh Government as attempting to deny the outcome of the referendum. I say it again: we are focused on how we leave, not whether we leave. Here, though, are the three takeaway messages from the Member's contribution this afternoon: for our population, a future in which he says, 'Let them eat chlorinated chicken, that will be good for them'; for our economy, he invites them to accompany him to the end of a pier in Aberystwyth, hand them a rubber ring, point them in the direction of New York and say, 'There may be some transitional problems, but there'll be massive opportunities if you ever get there'; and for the rest of our democracy, he says the example of President Trump is there before you. Don't be dazzled by the light that surrounds him.
Welsh: Wel, Dirprwy Lywydd, mae'n debyg nad oes unrhyw brynhawn lle sonnir am god Napoleon a Lord North yn y Cynulliad yn wastraff llwyr, ond rwy'n ofni'n fawr iawn mae dirywio wnaeth hi o hynny ymlaen. Mae'r Aelod yn gwneud ei sylwadau arferol am y Brexit y mae yntau'n ei ffafrio a'r Brexit y cafodd ei berswadio i bleidleisio o'i blaid, ond mae'n hollol anghywir i ddweud bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn ceisio gwadu canlyniad y refferendwm. Fe ddywedaf hyn eto: rydym ni'n canolbwyntio ar sut yr ydym ni'n gadael, nid a fyddwn ni'n gadael. Dyma, fodd bynnag, y tair neges i'w cadw mewn cof o gyfraniad yr Aelod y prynhawn yma: ar gyfer ein poblogaeth, dyfodol ble mae yntau'n dweud, 'Gadewch iddyn nhw fwyta cyw iâr wedi ei gannu, bydd hynny'n dda iddyn nhw'; ar gyfer ein heconomi, mae'n eu gwahodd i fynd gydag ef i ben y pier yn Aberystwyth, rhoi cylch rwber iddyn nhw, eu cyfeirio at Efrog Newydd a dweud, 'efallai y bydd rhai problemau pontio, ond bydd cyfleoedd enfawr os gyrhaeddwch chi fyth'; ac ar gyfer gweddill ein democratiaeth, dywed fod enghraifft yr Arlywydd Trump ger eich bron. Peidiwch â chael eich dallu gan y golau sy'n ei amgylchynu.
English: Thank you. I have two more speakers. If they can guarantee they will ask a brief question, I will call them both - and if the Minister can respond, as he always does, with brevity. Mick Antoniw.
Welsh: Diolch. Mae gennyf ddau siaradwr arall. Os gallan nhw warantu y byddan nhw'n gofyn cwestiwn byr, galwaf ar y ddau ohonyn nhw - ac os gall y Gweinidog ymateb, fel y gwna bob amser, yn gryno. Mick Antoniw.
English: Cabinet Secretary, on the basis that UKIP have raised the issue of Donald Trump, do you agree with President Trump that Boris Johnson would make a good Tory Prime Minister and that he would certainly be better than Theresa May? Do you agree that, if that were to happen - or even if it doesn't happen - any possible trade deal with America is now a potential disaster zone, bearing in mind the tariff war? And do you also agree with me that the proposal by the Tory Government now to actually cut and run by scuttling Parliament, by calling Parliament short, is a direct undermining of parliamentary democracy and an abuse of the democratic system, and that this is a Government that really shows that there's only one option left for it, and that's to call a general election?
Welsh: Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, ar y sail bod UKIP wedi codi'r mater o Donald Trump, a ydych chi'n cytuno â'r Arlywydd Trump y byddai Boris Johnson yn Brif Weinidog Torïaidd da ac y byddai ef yn sicr yn well na Theresa May? A ydych chi'n cytuno, pe bai hynny'n digwydd - neu hyd yn oed os nad yw'n digwydd - fod unrhyw fargen fasnach bosib ag America bellach yn drychineb bosib, gan gadw mewn cof y rhyfel tollau? Ac a ydych chi hefyd yn cytuno â mi bod y cynnig gan y Llywodraeth Dorïaidd nawr i'w heglu hi gan ddiddymu'r Senedd, gan derfynu'r Senedd yn fuan, yn tanseilio'n uniongyrchol ddemocratiaeth seneddol ac yn camfanteisio ar y system ddemocrataidd, a bod hon yn Llywodraeth sy'n dangos mewn gwirionedd nad oes ganddi ond un dewis ar ôl, a hynny yw galw etholiad cyffredinol?
English: I agree on the final point, definitely, Llywydd. The UKIP spokesperson suggested that Mrs May was the worst Prime Minister since Lord North. Surely there has never been a president of the United States in such disrepute as the current incumbent of that office, and we should take him at his word that if any trade deal were to be struck with the United States, it would be 'America first' that would be in his mind, and anything that we get will simply be the crumbs that fall from his table.
Welsh: Cytunaf ar y pwynt olaf, yn bendant, Llywydd. Awgrymodd llefarydd UKIP mai Mrs May oedd y Prif Weinidog gwaethaf ers Lord North. Does bosib na fu arlywydd erioed yn yr Unol Daleithiau ag enw mor ddrwg â deiliad presennol y swydd honno, ac fe ddylem ni gredu ei eiriau pe cai unrhyw fargen fasnach ei tharo â'r Unol Daleithiau, yna 'America yn gyntaf' fyddai yn ei feddwl ef, a byddai unrhyw beth a gaem ni yn friwsion fyddai'n yn syrthio oddi ar ei fwrdd.
English: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Cabinet Secretary, I fully welcome your statement and I agree with everything you said in that statement and all the answers you've given. Can I also agree with comments from Steffan Lewis and agree with some of the point he was making? It's very important that we address those. It was poor of the Conservative representative to comment on 'fun and games' in this. These are people's lives, these are our constituents and it's their jobs that are going to be affected by the outcomes of this. Just some quick questions, Dirprwy Llywydd. On the White Paper, in reading through it - and I'm sorry to say I didn't have time to read through it all - there are very serious elements in there that affect Welsh Government competencies. Now, you said you didn't get the paper until 01:35 in the morning. You, therefore, haven't been consulted on a contribution into that paper. It talks about a joint committee that may oversee work going on, but it doesn't reference the Welsh Government in terms of representation on that joint committee; it talks about other actions. Do you really have confidence that they're going to listen to us in the negotiations going on? We know that they should be in the trade deals, but we're still seeing whether they will or not. There's a huge gap here in confidence in the UK Government in being able to deliver - where our voices are heard, let alone acted upon.
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, rwy'n croesawu eich datganiad yn llawn ac rwy'n cytuno â phopeth y gwnaethoch chi ei ddweud yn y datganiad hwnnw a'r holl atebion a roesoch chi. A gaf i hefyd gytuno â sylwadau Steffan Lewis a chytuno â rhai o'r pwyntiau yr oedd yn eu gwneud? Mae'n bwysig iawn inni fynd i'r afael â'r rheini. Roedd hi'n wael i gynrychiolydd y Ceidwadwyr sôn am 'rwdl-mi-ri' yn hyn o beth. Bywydau pobl yw'r rhain, ein hetholwyr ni ydyn nhw, a'u swyddi nhw yr effeithir arnyn nhw gan y canlyniadau hyn. Dim ond rhai cwestiynau cyflym, Dirprwy Lywydd. O ran y Papur Gwyn, o ddarllen drwyddo - ac mae'n ddrwg gennyf ddweud nad oedd gennyf ddigon o amser i ddarllen trwy'r cyfan - ceir elfennau difrifol iawn yno sy'n effeithio ar gymwyseddau Llywodraeth Cymru. Nawr, fe wnaethoch chi ddweud na chawsoch chi mo'r papur tan 01:35 yn y bore. Felly, ni ymgynghorwyd â chi ynglŷn â chyfrannu i'r papur. Mae'n sôn am gydbwyllgor a allai oruchwylio'r gwaith sy'n mynd rhagddo, ond nid yw'n cyfeirio at Lywodraeth Cymru o ran cynrychiolaeth ar y cydbwyllgor hwnnw; mae'n sôn am gamau gweithredu eraill. A ydych chi mewn difrif yn ffyddiog y byddan nhw'n gwrando arnom ni yn y trafodaethau sy'n mynd rhagddynt? Rydym ni'n gwybod y dylen nhw fod yn y cytundebau masnachu, ond rydym ni'n dal i weld a fyddan nhw yno neu beidio. Mae diffyg hyder enfawr yma y gall Llywodraeth y DU ddarparu - mewn ffordd lle y mae'n llais ni i'w glywed, heb sôn am weithredu ar hynny.
English: I thank David Rees for his support for the statement this afternoon and for associating himself with the remarks that others have made in the Chamber about the seriousness of the position that we are facing. He's right, of course; we were not consulted on core parts of the White Paper that directly impinge upon Welsh interests. Can I be confident that they will listen? Well, that isn't in my gift, Dirprwy Lywydd. What is in my gift is to make sure that wherever there is an opportunity to speak up for Wales and with our point of view, we will take those opportunities. Whether we are listened to is a different matter, but if we're not listened to, it's not because of any lack in our determination to make that case and to try our very best to make sure that the interests of Wales are articulated and heard.
Welsh: Diolch i David Rees am gefnogi'r datganiad y prynhawn yma ac am arddel y sylwadau y mae eraill wedi eu gwneud yn y Siambr ynghylch difrifoldeb y sefyllfa sy'n ein hwynebu. Mae'n gywir, wrth gwrs; ni ymgynghorwyd â ni ar rannau craidd y Papur Gwyn sy'n effeithio'n uniongyrchol ar fuddiannau Cymru. A allaf i fod yn ffyddiog y byddant yn gwrando? Wel, ni allaf fod yn sicr o hynny, Dirprwy Lywydd. Ond yr hyn y gallaf ei wneud yw gwneud yn siŵr ble bynnag y cyfyd cyfle i siarad dros Gymru ac o'n safbwynt ni, byddwn yn achub ar y cyfleoedd hynny. Mae p'un a wrandewir arnom ni yn fater gwahanol, ond os na wrandewir arnom ni, nid yw hynny oherwydd unrhyw ddiffyg yn ein penderfyniad ni i gyflwyno'r achos hwnnw a cheisio'n gorau glas i wneud yn siŵr y caiff buddiannau Cymru eu mynegi a'u clywed.
English: Item 5 is a statement by the Cabinet Secretary for Local Government and Public Services: local government reform - next steps. I call on the Cabinet Secretary, Alun Davies.
Welsh: Eitem 5 yw Datganiad gan Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Lywodraeth Leol a Gwasanaethau Cyhoeddus: Diwygio Llywodraeth Leol - y camau nesaf. Galwaf ar Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, Alun Davies.
English: Presiding Officer, I'm afraid I'm going to start my response this afternoon by breaking Janet's heart. I'm sure she didn't intend this, but I actually think her remarks are very helpful, and I actually agree with much of what she said. I know this is somewhat unusual; I can see the Presiding Officer looks quite surprised as well.
Welsh: Llywydd, mae arnaf ofn fy mod i am ddechrau fy ymateb y prynhawn yma drwy dorri calon Janet. Rwy'n siŵr nad dyma oedd ei bwriad hi, ond rwyf wir yn meddwl bod ei sylwadau o gymorth mawr, ac a dweud y gwir, rwy'n cytuno â llawer o'r hyn a ddywedodd. Rwy'n gwybod bod hyn braidd yn anarferol; gallaf weld bod y Llywydd yn edrych braidd yn syn hefyd.
English: No, I'm merely smiling. It's the end of term; I'm smiling.
Welsh: Na, dim ond gwenu wyf i. Mae'n diwedd y tymor; rwy'n gwenu.
English: The next statement is a statement by the Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Transport, as an update on Welsh Government requirements for other rail franchises serving Wales and rail infrastructure investment. I call on the Cabinet Secretary to make the statement - Ken Skates.
Welsh: Y datganiad nesaf, felly, yw'r un gan yr Ysgrifennydd Cabinet dros yr Economi a Thrafnidiaeth ar ddiweddariad ar ofynion Llywodraeth Cymru ar gyfer masnachfreintiau rheilffyrdd eraill sy'n gwasanaethu Cymru a buddsoddiad yn y seilwaith rheilffyrdd. Rwy'n galw ar yr Ysgrifennydd Cabinet i wneud ei ddatganiad - Ken Skates.
English: Thank you, Cabinet Secretary and Professor Barry for showing so starkly, truth be told, how badly Wales is being treated - that is, a country that has 5 per cent of the population, as we heard, and 11 per cent of the rail network getting 1 per cent of the investment. Of course, this has been true for many years.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet a'r Athro Barry am ddangos mor gignoeth, a dweud y gwir, pa mor wael mae Cymru yn cael ei thrin - hynny yw, gwlad sydd â 5 y cant o'r boblogaeth, fel y clywsom ni, ac 11 y cant o'r rhwydwaith rheilffyrdd yn cael 1 y cant o'r buddsoddiad. Wrth gwrs, mae hyn wedi bod yn wir am flynyddoedd.
English: I mean, forget Crossrail, we in Wales should be livid because of the way that we're being treated.
Welsh: Yn wir, anghofiwch Crossrail, fe ddylem ni yng Nghymru fod yn gandryll oherwydd y ffordd yr ydym ni'n cael ein trin.
English: Diolch. Just one question: given your statement, oft repeated, that the Wales route only received 1 per cent of the rail enhancement budget, how do you respond to the evidence received by the Economy, Infrastructure and Skills Committee we heard referred to a moment ago, by Network Rail, relating to the Office of Rail and Road report on UK rail industry financial information, which showed that Wales actually received 9.6 per cent of net Government funding for franchise train operators and Network Rail, and 6.4 per cent of total net Government funding for Network Rail routes?
Welsh: Diolch. Dim ond un cwestiwn: o gofio eich datganiad, a ailadroddir yn aml, mai dim ond 1 y cant o'r gyllideb ar gyfer gwella rheilffyrdd a dderbyniodd rhwydwaith Cymru, sut ydych chi'n ymateb i'r dystiolaeth a gafwyd gan y Pwyllgor Economi, Seilwaith a Sgiliau y clywsom gyfeiriad ato eiliad yn ôl, gan Network Rail, sy'n ymwneud ag adroddiad y Swyddfa Rheilffyrdd a Ffyrdd ar wybodaeth ariannol diwydiant rheilffyrdd y DU, a ddangosodd fod Cymru mewn gwirionedd wedi derbyn 9.6 y cant o arian Llywodraeth net ar gyfer gweithredwyr masnachfraint trenau a Network Rail, a 6.4 y cant o gyfanswm net arian y Llywodraeth ar gyfer llwybrau Network Rail?