English: I thank Members for their contributions, and I'll be brief in my closing remarks. When Plaid Cymru tabled this debate, we'd had years of intransigence from this Government on this question. So, I am glad that that intransigence has finally ended. Now, we've heard this afternoon how many people have already had their support cut, and it's good that those people will have the opportunity to have their cases reviewed on a voluntary basis, but I very much hope that those people who have lost out on their support will have it fully reinstated. Otherwise, you're going to risk putting people through an extremely stressful process again for nothing at all. Helen Mary Jones pointed to the understandable lack of confidence on the part of the recipients with this process. She also made an excellent point about Tory hypocrisy on the question of welfare benefits. Listening to them, it's like they've never spoken to somebody who's been knocked off PIP: so out of touch. So many people have been put through hell. Just yesterday, we heard the UK Government admit that the rise in food bank usage is down to universal credit. Surely that says all we need to know. Thanks to Mike Hedges for reminding us of Labour Party policy - grateful to you for that. He also pointed out the campaigners' concerns about cuts to this provision from cash-strapped, austerity-hit local authorities. While guarantees may have been there now in the current financial year, the fear is what would have happened over the longer term, and it's pretty obvious what would have happened, really. As my colleague Llyr has pointed out, our Senedd here provides us with the opportunity to do things differently, to lift people up, to enhance people's support. 'We all value our independence', he said. Well, I say, 'Amen to that.' A commission to look at the whole picture facing disabled people is an excellent call, which I'm sure most of us will be able to get behind. I thank the Minister for her statement and I very much welcome the announcement that she made yesterday. The Minister said that some of the people could have had their support cut for a number of different reasons. I looked at the analysis from the deep-dive review and I've seen that one of the reasons given in that review was that some recipients may have had their allowance cut because they now receive support in a day-care setting. Well, the problem with this is austerity, and cash-strapped councils are all cutting their day-care provision because they can't afford it. So, what might exist for people now may well not exist in the future. So, looking at this again was an absolute must, and the impact of other decisions taken in other places have to be considered here as well. This question can't be considered in isolation. To everyone who's paid tribute to Nathan Davies, who I met for the first time back in 2015, it may well be an overused word, but I have to say Nathan Davies is a real inspiration on this question. I'm pretty sure that we'll see him continue to campaign on disability rights. I very much hope that we do anyway, because he is very, very effective. He's shown what is possible with political campaigning. As some of the contributors have already said, the issue of the independent living fund isn't over. There's more to do after this pause, and I'm sure Nathan will be on the case.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelodau am eu cyfraniadau, ac fe fyddaf yn gryno yn fy sylwadau i gloi. Pan gyflwynodd Plaid Cymru y ddadl hon, roeddem wedi cael blynyddoedd o anhyblygrwydd gan y Llywodraeth hon ar y cwestiwn hwn. Felly, rwy'n falch fod yr anhyblygrwydd hwnnw wedi dod i ben o'r diwedd. Nawr, fe glywsom y prynhawn yma faint o bobl sydd eisoes wedi gweld eu cymorth yn cael ei dorri, ac mae'n dda y bydd y bobl hyn yn cael cyfle i gael eu hachosion wedi'u hadolygu ar sail wirfoddol, ond rwy'n mawr obeithio y bydd y bobl sydd wedi gweld eu cymorth yn cael ei dorri yn ei gael wedi'i adfer yn llawn. Fel arall, rydych mewn perygl o roi pobl drwy broses anodd iawn eto i ddim diben o gwbl. Cyfeiriodd Helen Mary Jones at ddiffyg hyder dealladwy y rhai sy'n derbyn y grant yn y broses hon. Gwnaeth bwynt ardderchog am ragrith y Torïaid hefyd ar fater budd-daliadau lles. O wrando arnynt hwy, mae fel pe na baent erioed wedi siarad â rhywun sydd wedi colli'r taliad annibyniaeth personol: maent mor bell ohoni. Mae cymaint o bobl wedi'u rhoi drwy uffern. Ddoe ddiwethaf, clywsom Lywodraeth y DU yn cyfaddef bod y cynnydd yn y defnydd o fanciau bwyd yn deillio o'r credyd cynhwysol. Does bosib nad yw hynny'n dweud y cyfan sydd angen inni ei wybod. Diolch i Mike Hedges am ein hatgoffa am bolisi'r Blaid Lafur - diolch i chi am hynny. Hefyd tynnodd sylw at bryderon yr ymgyrchwyr ynghylch toriadau i'r ddarpariaeth hon gan awdurdodau lleol sy'n brin o arian ac o dan bwysau cyni. Er y gall fod gwarantau yno bellach yn y flwyddyn ariannol gyfredol, yr ofn yw beth fyddai wedi digwydd dros y tymor hwy, ac mae'n eithaf amlwg beth fyddai wedi digwydd, mewn gwirionedd. Fel y nododd fy nghyd-Aelod Llyr, mae'r Senedd yma yn rhoi cyfle inni wneud pethau'n wahanol, i godi pobl, i wella cymorth pobl. 'Mae pawb ohonom yn gwerthfawrogi ein hannibyniaeth', meddai. Wel, rwy'n dweud, 'Amen i hynny.' Mae comisiwn i edrych ar y darlun cyfan sy'n wynebu pobl anabl yn syniad ardderchog, ac rwy'n siŵr y bydd y rhan fwyaf ohonom yn gallu cefnogi hynny. Diolch i'r Gweinidog am ei datganiad, ac rwy'n croesawu'n fawr y cyhoeddiad a wnaeth ddoe. Dywedodd y Gweinidog y gallai rhai pobl fod wedi cael toriad i'w cymorth am nifer o resymau gwahanol. Edrychais ar ddadansoddiad yr adolygiad dwfn a gwelais mai un o'r rhesymau a roddwyd yn yr adolygiad hwnnw oedd y gallai rhai o'r bobl sy'n derbyn grant fod wedi cael toriad i'w lwfans am eu bod bellach yn cael cymorth mewn lleoliad gofal dydd. Wel, y broblem gyda hyn yw cyni, ac mae pob cyngor sy'n brin o arian yn torri eu darpariaeth gofal dydd oherwydd na allant ei fforddio. Felly, efallai na fydd yr hyn sy'n bodoli i bobl yn awr yn bodoli yn y dyfodol. Felly, roedd rhaid edrych ar hyn eto, a rhaid ystyried effaith penderfyniadau eraill a wnaethpwyd mewn mannau eraill yma yn ogystal. Ni ellir ystyried y cwestiwn hwn ar ei ben ei hun. I bawb sydd wedi talu teyrnged i Nathan Davies, y cyfarfûm ag ef am y tro cyntaf yn ôl yn 2015, efallai fod y gair wedi'i orddefnyddio, ond rhaid i mi ddweud bod Nathan Davies yn ysbrydoliaeth wirioneddol yn y mater hwn. Rwy'n eithaf siŵr y byddwn yn ei weld yn parhau i ymgyrchu ar hawliau anabledd. Rwy'n mawr obeithio y byddwn yn gweld hynny beth bynnag, oherwydd mae'n effeithiol tu hwnt. Mae wedi dangos beth sy'n bosibl drwy ymgyrchu gwleidyddol. Fel y mae rhai o'r cyfranwyr wedi dweud eisoes, nid yw mater y gronfa byw'n annibynnol ar ben. Mae rhagor i'w wneud ar ôl y saib hwn, ac rwy'n siŵr y bydd Nathan yn ymgyrchu dros hynny.