English: No-one's asking for names, First Minister, and there are plenty of processes that you can point to where people's identity is protected. I did point to Twitter, but I point you to social media as well. I've given you the examples here. That's the language from professional people that was being used around the time of the Cabinet reshuffle, and they were using it two or three days prior to the reshuffle. I would hope that you can be exonerated and that some of the horrendous allegations that are levelled at the Government and at you can be discounted, because ultimately we know what tragedy followed from it. But it is difficult for me, other Members and interested parties to have confidence in reports that we are prevented from seeing. Now, I hear what you said twice to me today. I have three questions. There must be a way of allowing information to come forward that is redacted and that can give confidence that the opinions that have been formed around some of the allegations can be discounted by this report. Not having sight of this report makes it very difficult to argue that case. I would argue for you to sit down with the Permanent Secretary to come up with a formula that will allow us to have sight of as much of the report as possible, preventing any disclosure of names or identities of people, so that we can have that confidence, because the evidence - and I can pull out many other examples - points to information that was already in the public domain before Ministers and Cabinet Secretaries came in to have that discussion with you. That's a fact.
Welsh: Does neb yn gofyn am enwau, Prif Weinidog, ac mae digon o brosesau y gallwch chi gyfeirio atyn nhw lle mae manylion adnabod pobl wedi ei cuddio. Fe wnes i gyfeirio at Twitter, ond rwy'n eich cyfeirio at gyfryngau cymdeithasol hefyd. Rwyf i wedi rhoi enghreifftiau i chi yn y fan yma. Dyna'r iaith gan bobl broffesiynol a oedd yn cael ei defnyddio tua adeg ad-drefnu'r Cabinet, ac roedden nhw'n ei defnyddio ddau neu dri diwrnod cyn yr ad-drefnu. Byddwn yn gobeithio y gellir eich rhyddhau o unrhyw fai ac y gellir diystyru rhai o'r honiadau echrydus y mae'r Llywodraeth yn cael ei chyhuddo ohonynt, oherwydd rydym ni'n gwybod y drasiedi a ddeilliodd ohonynt yn y pen draw. Ond mae'n anodd i mi, i Aelodau eraill ac i bartïon â buddiant fod â hyder mewn adroddiadau yr ydym ni'n cael ein hatal rhag eu gweld. Nawr, rwy'n clywed yr hyn a ddywedasoch wrthyf i ddwywaith heddiw. Mae gen i dri chwestiwn. Mae'n rhaid bod ffordd o ganiatáu i wybodaeth gael ei chyflwyno sydd wedi ei golygu ac a all roi ffydd y gall yr adroddiad hwn ddiystyru safbwyntiau a ffurfiwyd ar sail rhai o'r honiadau. Mae peidio â chael cyfle i weld yr adroddiad hwn yn ei gwneud yn anodd iawn i ddadlau'r achos hwnnw. Byddwn yn dadlau y dylech eistedd i lawr gyda'r Ysgrifennydd Parhaol i lunio fformiwla a fydd yn caniatáu i ni gael golwg ar gymaint o'r adroddiad â phosibl, gan osgoi datgelu unrhyw enwau na manylion adnabod pobl, fel y gallwn ni fod â'r ffydd hwnnw, oherwydd mae'r dystiolaeth - a gallaf gynnig llawer o enghreifftiau eraill - yn cyfeirio at wybodaeth a oedd eisoes yn gyhoeddus cyn i Weinidogion ac Ysgrifenyddion y Cabinet ddod i mewn i gael y drafodaeth honno gyda chi. Mae hynny'n ffaith.