techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, thank you for those comments, and I don't disagree with the points that you've made. Many of them are points that we've made very much within our 'Delivering Justice for Wales' paper, and of course the recent research by Cardiff University, the publication, The Welsh Criminal Justice System: On the Jagged Edge, I think is really important. What is important in terms of the engagement that we do have with UK Government over the Thomas commission is of course that they are supportive and they've accepted the points about the disaggregation of data that we actually need to have the breakdown of data for Wales, because in order to formulate policy you actually need to know what is happening. I think we were all, weren't we, absolutely astonished and shocked, I think, by some of the data from Cardiff University, that per 10,000 of the population 14 in prison would be white and 79 would be from coloured or ethnic backgrounds. That is an absolutely shocking set of figures, and the disaggregation of information enables us to understand why that is, why we have a higher imprisonment of Welsh citizens within the justice system, and things that we need to understand. And it goes exactly into the reasoning as to why we want the devolution of justice. What is important, I think, about the Gordon Brown report - and of course I will look forward to, eventually, the full report from our own independent commission - is that there are no doors closed.
Welsh: Wel, diolch am y sylwadau hynny, ac nid wyf yn anghytuno â'r pwyntiau rydych wedi'u gwneud. Mae llawer ohonynt yn bwyntiau rydym wedi'u gwneud yn ein papur 'Sicrhau Cyfiawnder i Gymru', ac wrth gwrs mae'r ymchwil diweddar gan Brifysgol Caerdydd, y cyhoeddiad The Welsh Criminal Justice System: On the Jagged Edge, yn wirioneddol bwysig yn fy marn i. Yr hyn sy'n bwysig ynglŷn â'n hymgysylltiad â Llywodraeth y DU mewn perthynas â chomisiwn Thomas yw eu bod yn gefnogol wrth gwrs, a'u bod wedi derbyn y pwyntiau am ddadgyfuno data rydym ei angen i gael dadansoddiad data i Gymru, oherwydd er mwyn ffurfio polisi mae angen ichi wybod beth sy'n digwydd mewn gwirionedd. Rwy'n credu ein bod i gyd wedi cael ein syfrdanu'n llwyr gan rywfaint o'r data gan Brifysgol Caerdydd, a oedd yn dangos, o bob 10,000 o'r boblogaeth, y byddai 14 o'r rhai yng ngharchar yn wyn a 79 o gefndiroedd du neu ethnig leiafrifol. Mae'r rhain yn ffigurau hollol frawychus, ac mae dadgyfuno gwybodaeth yn ein galluogi i ddeall pam fod hynny'n digwydd, pam fod mwy o ddinasyddion Cymru yn cael eu carcharu o fewn y system gyfiawnder, a phethau y mae angen i ni eu deall. Ac mae'n cyd-fynd yn union â'r rheswm pam ein bod eisiau datganoli cyfiawnder. Yr hyn sy'n bwysig am adroddiad Gordon Brown yn fy marn i - ac wrth gwrs, byddaf yn edrych ymlaen at yr adroddiad llawn gan ein comisiwn annibynnol ein hunain maes o law - yw nad oes unrhyw ddrysau ar gau.
English: Thank you for the question. I wrote to the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Lord Bellamy, in August of this year, to call for full disclosure from public bodies during public inquiries or criminal proceedings. I believe that a Hillsborough law would benefit the demand for a public inquiry into events at Orgreave.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiwn. Ysgrifennais at yr Is-ysgrifennydd Gwladol Seneddol dros Gyfiawnder, yr Arglwydd Bellamy, ym mis Awst eleni, i alw ar gyrff cyhoeddus i ddatgelu gwybodaeth yn llawn yn ystod ymchwiliadau cyhoeddus neu achosion troseddol. Credaf y byddai cyfraith Hillsborough o fudd i'r alwad am ymchwiliad cyhoeddus i ddigwyddiadau yn Orgreave.
English: Can I thank the Counsel General for that answer and his commitment to a Hillsborough law, something that I've used my time in questions to the Counsel General to highlight, and highlight other areas of injustice? Because it is far too hard for working-class people in the United Kingdom and in Wales to access justice. The Orgreave miners, including many from Wales, were victims of a gross injustice. On the day, many were victims of brutal and sustained unlawful assault, and what happened subsequently is a real stain on the British legal system. Counsel General, these former miners deserve justice, and it behoves all of us who care about justice to keep raising this matter. Can I seek your assurance that you, as Counsel General, and Welsh Government Ministers, will take every opportunity you have to raise this with UK Government counterparts and take every opportunity to speak out and keep the flame for justice for Orgreave burning?
Welsh: A gaf fi ddiolch i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol am yr ateb hwnnw a'i ymrwymiad i gyfraith Hillsborough, rhywbeth rwyf wedi tynnu sylw ato mewn cwestiynau i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol, ynghyd â meysydd eraill o anghyfiawnder? Oherwydd mae'n llawer rhy anodd i bobl ddosbarth gweithiol yn y Deyrnas Unedig ac yng Nghymru gael mynediad at gyfiawnder. Fe wnaeth glowyr Orgreave, gan gynnwys llawer o Gymru, ddioddef anghyfiawnder dybryd. Ar y diwrnod, fe wnaeth llawer ohonynt ddioddef ymosodiadau anghyfreithlon creulon a pharhaus, ac mae'r hyn a ddigwyddodd wedyn yn staen go iawn ar system gyfreithiol Prydain. Gwnsler Cyffredinol, mae'r cyn-lowyr hyn yn haeddu cyfiawnder, a dylai pawb ohonom sy'n poeni am gyfiawnder barhau i godi'r mater hwn. A gaf fi ofyn am sicrwydd y byddwch chi, fel Cwnsler Cyffredinol, a Gweinidogion Llywodraeth Cymru, yn manteisio ar bob cyfle a gewch i godi hyn gyda swyddogion cyfatebol yn Llywodraeth y DU ac i fanteisio ar bob cyfle i godi llais a chadw fflam cyfiawnder yn fyw dros Orgreave?
English: I thank you very much for that and for raising that. I don't know whether you're aware; I was of course one of the lawyers in the Orgreave trial and riot cases, in which we actually obtained an absolute non-committal, a 'not guilty', in respect of all 90 of the cases of persons that I was involved in, and we then actually took civil action against the police for malicious prosecution and wrongful arrest. All of those civil actions were completely successful. What was important about them and what is important about this issue is that it relates to the exercise of power by the state. And my belief is that there is evidence and there will be documentation that is yet to be disclosed that will show that the decisions taken at Orgreave - and, of course, it relates to other matters that we're aware of with regard to Hillsborough, but those matters, those decisions - were actually taken at the very highest level, at prime ministerial level. That is my belief in that, and that is my belief as to why an inquiry won't be carried out by this Government. I am very pleased that the next Labour Government has given a commitment that it will carry out an inquiry into Orgreave, that those documents will be disclosed, not because it's something of raking over history, something that happened a long time ago, but, with all abuses of power that occur by a state, it's important that those are made public and that those are dealt with in the proper way.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr i chi am hynny ac am godi hynny. Nid wyf yn gwybod a ydych yn ymwybodol fy mod yn un o'r cyfreithwyr yn achos Orgreave a'r achosion terfysg, lle gwnaethom sicrhau dedfryd 'ddieuog' mewn perthynas â phob un o'r 90 achos roeddwn yn rhan ohonynt, ac yna fe wnaethom roi camau sifil ar waith yn erbyn yr heddlu am erlyniad maleisus ac arestio ar gam. Roedd yr holl achosion sifil hynny'n gwbl lwyddiannus. Yr hyn a oedd yn bwysig amdanynt a'r hyn sy'n bwysig am y mater hwn yw ei fod yn ymwneud ag arfer grym gan y wladwriaeth. Ac rwy'n credu bod tystiolaeth, a bydd dogfennaeth sydd eto i'w datgelu a fydd yn dangos bod y penderfyniadau a wnaed yn Orgreave - ac wrth gwrs mae'n ymwneud â materion eraill rydym yn ymwybodol ohonynt mewn perthynas â Hillsborough, ond y materion hynny, y penderfyniadau hynny - wedi cael eu gwneud ar y lefel uchaf un mewn gwirionedd, ar lefel brif weinidogol. Dyna yw fy nghred yn hynny o beth, ac rwy'n credu mai dyna yw'r rheswm pam na chynhelir ymchwiliad gan y Llywodraeth hon. Rwy'n falch iawn fod y Llywodraeth Lafur nesaf wedi rhoi ymrwymiad y bydd yn cynnal ymchwiliad i Orgreave, y bydd y dogfennau hynny'n cael eu datgelu, nid oherwydd ei fod yn ailgodi'r gorffennol, rhywbeth a ddigwyddodd amser maith yn ôl, ond bob tro y bydd gwladwriaeth yn camddefnyddio ei phŵer, mae'n bwysig fod yr achosion hynny'n cael eu gwneud yn gyhoeddus a'u bod yn cael eu trin yn y ffordd briodol.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. Building on what you've said in your previous responses, although we cannot support Gordon Brown's constitutional reform recommendations announced by the UK Labour Party on Monday in their entirety, there are elements that, in our view, merit consideration, including proposals to ensure that Wales has a permanent voice, not just in the House of Commons, but in the second Chamber, if this would lead to proper bicameral scrutiny of devolved legislation; proposals to seek greater co-operation between the four UK Governments to deal with shared problems, such as pandemics and pollution; and proposals to enhance the role of Members of this Senedd so that they could enjoy the same privileges and protections as Members of Parliament in relation to statements made in their proceedings. We also note the statement by Labour's Lord Blunkett that Sir Keir Starmer's plans for an elected second Chamber risk US-style gridlock and should not be a priority, and that, despite the First Minister's statement here last week, that the transfer of responsibility for justice matters, which is the policy of his Government, was contained in the Labour manifesto in the 2017 and 2019 UK general elections, UK Labour now only proposes to devolve powers over youth justice and the probation services to the Welsh Government. How do you therefore respond to this, and do you agree - I think I can judge the answer; it's a rhetorical question - but do you agree that this now puts to bed the wider devolution of justice and policing to Wales?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Gan adeiladu ar yr hyn rydych wedi'i ddweud yn eich ymatebion blaenorol, er na allwn gefnogi argymhellion diwygio cyfansoddiadol Gordon Brown a gyhoeddwyd gan Blaid Lafur y DU ddydd Llun yn eu cyfanrwydd, mae yna elfennau sydd, yn ein barn ni, yn haeddu ystyriaeth, gan gynnwys cynigion i sicrhau bod gan Gymru lais parhaol, nid yn unig yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin, ond yn yr ail Siambr, pe bai hyn yn arwain at waith craffu dwysiambr priodol ar y ddeddfwriaeth ddatganoledig; cynigion i geisio mwy o gydweithio rhwng pedair Llywodraeth y DU i ymdrin â phroblemau cyffredinol, fel pandemigau a llygredd; a chynigion i wella rôl Aelodau'r Senedd hon fel y gallent fwynhau'r un breintiau ac amddiffyniadau ag Aelodau Seneddol mewn perthynas â datganiadau a wnaed yn eu trafodion. Rydym hefyd yn nodi'r datganiad gan Arglwydd Blunkett y Blaid Lafur fod cynlluniau Syr Keir Starmer ar gyfer ail siambr etholedig yn creu perygl o dagfa ddeddfwriaethol debyg i'r hyn a geir yn yr Unol Daleithiau ac na ddylai fod yn flaenoriaeth, ac er gwaethaf datganiad y Prif Weinidog yma yr wythnos diwethaf, fod trosglwyddo cyfrifoldeb am faterion cyfiawnder, sef polisi ei Lywodraeth, wedi'i gynnwys ym maniffesto Llafur yn etholiadau cyffredinol y DU yn 2017 a 2019, mae Plaid Lafur y DU bellach ond yn cynnig datganoli pwerau dros gyfiawnder ieuenctid a'r gwasanaethau prawf i Lywodraeth Cymru. Sut rydych chi'n ymateb i hyn felly, ac a ydych yn cytuno - rwy'n credu fy mod yn gwybod beth fydd yr ateb; mae'n gwestiwn rhethregol - ond a ydych yn cytuno bod hyn nawr yn cau'r drws ar ddatganoli cyfiawnder ehangach a phlismona i Gymru?
English: Well, obviously, we do want the maximum of co-operation between Members of the Senedd and any public bodies, and, indeed, private bodies as well, where they reflect upon Senedd matters and Senedd duties and constituency duties. I think the only way I can refer you, in terms of the matter that you raised and of which I have no specific knowledge, is that the rights and entitlements are set out in the Data Protection Act. Where an individual is dissatisfied with the response they've had to a Freedom of Information Act 2000 request, there is a process where it can be referred to the data protection commissioner, who will then basically consider the legal position on that and whether that is something that should or should not be disclosed. And I think that is the appropriate course of action that should be being taken there.
Welsh: Wel, yn amlwg, rydym am weld cymaint ag y bo modd o gydweithio rhwng Aelodau'r Senedd ac unrhyw gyrff cyhoeddus, a chyrff preifat hefyd yn wir, lle maent yn ystyried materion y Senedd a dyletswyddau'r Senedd a dyletswyddau etholaethol. Rwy'n credu mai'r unig ffordd y gallaf eich cyfeirio, ynghylch y mater a godwyd gennych ac nad oes gennyf wybodaeth benodol amdano, yw bod yr hawliau wedi'u nodi yn y Ddeddf Diogelu Data. Pan fo unigolyn yn anfodlon â'r ymateb a gawsant i gais Deddf Rhyddid Gwybodaeth 2000,ceir proses lle gellir ei gyfeirio at y comisiynydd diogelu data, a fydd wedyn yn ystyried y sefyllfa gyfreithiol ar hynny yn y bôn ac a yw hynny'n rhywbeth y dylid ei ddatgelu neu na ddylid ei ddatgelu. Ac rwy'n credu mai dyna'r camau priodol y dylid eu cymryd yn hynny o beth.
English: Thank you. I did respond accordingly. But of course, this wasn't a freedom of information request, I was making representations - as we all do - on a neutral basis, representing my constituents at their request, and with their written authority, so it was an alarming response. And in that context, as I trust you're also aware, the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014, Part 10, code of practice, relating to advocacy, states that local authorities, when exercising their social services functions, must act in accordance with the requirements contained in this code, and that it is open to any individual to exercise choice and to invite any advocate to support them in expressing their views, wishes and feelings. However, after an autistic adult recently asked me to attend a meeting with the same local authority, as an advocate for her - as I've done scores of times with constituents and public bodies; I'm sure you have also - she received a message from the local authority this weekend, stating, 'I'm not able to invite Mark to the meeting as I've been informed by higher management that if Mark has any issues regarding yourself or your son, he needs to access customer services.' I hope you'll agree that these and other similar responses by a local authority's senior management are serious matters, with potentially damaging repercussions. So, again, what action can you take to ensure that repeat offenders, such as this local authority, both understand and operate within both UK and Welsh law?
Welsh: Diolch. Fe wneuthum ymateb yn unol â hynny. Ond wrth gwrs, nid cais rhyddid gwybodaeth oedd hwn, roeddwn i'n gwneud sylwadau - fel rydym i gyd yn ei wneud - yn niwtral, yn cynrychioli fy etholwyr gyda'u cais, a chyda'u hawdurdod ysgrifenedig, felly roedd yn ymateb sy'n peri pryder. Ac yn y cyd-destun hwnnw, fel y credaf eich bod yn gwybod, mae cod ymarfer Deddf Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol a Llesiant (Cymru) 2014, Rhan 10, mewn perthynas ag eiriolaeth, yn nodi bod rhaid i awdurdodau lleol, wrth arfer eu swyddogaethau gwasanaethau cymdeithasol, weithredu yn unol â'r gofynion a geir yn y cod hwn, a'i bod yn agored i unrhyw unigolyn ddewis a gwahodd unrhyw eiriolwr i'w cefnogi i fynegi eu barn, eu dymuniadau a'u teimladau. Fodd bynnag, ar ôl i oedolyn awtistig ofyn yn ddiweddar i mi fynychu cyfarfod gyda'r un awdurdod lleol, fel eiriolwr iddi - fel y gwneuthum ugeiniau o weithiau gydag etholwyr a chyrff cyhoeddus; rwy'n siŵr eich bod chithau wedi gwneud hynny hefyd - fe gafodd neges gan yr awdurdod lleol y penwythnos hwn yn dweud, 'Ni allaf wahodd Mark i'r cyfarfod gan fy mod wedi cael gwybod gan uwch reolwyr, os oes gan Mark unrhyw gwestiynau yn eich cylch chi neu eich mab, fod angen iddo fynd drwy'r gwasanaethau i gwsmeriaid.' Gobeithio y byddwch yn cytuno bod y rhain ac ymatebion tebyg eraill gan uwch reolwyr awdurdod lleol yn faterion difrifol, gyda sgil-effeithiau a allai fod yn niweidiol. Felly, unwaith eto, pa gamau y gallwch eu cymryd i sicrhau bod tramgwyddwyr mynych, fel yr awdurdod lleol hwn, yn deall ac yn gweithredu o fewn cyfraith y DU a chyfraith Cymru?
English: Thank you for that. In respect of the particular circumstances that you raise, I think those are ones that could and probably should be referred to the Minister, who I'm sure would respond. There is of course another course of action, in terms of reference to the ombudsman, in terms of the way in which the local authority that you refer to has acted. I just think it would be improper for me, on something that I have no direct knowledge of, to actually give any specific further comment than that.
Welsh: Diolch am hynny. Ar yr amgylchiadau penodol rydych chi'n eu codi, rwy'n credu bod y rheini'n rhai y gellid, ac mae'n debyg y dylid, eu cyfeirio at y Gweinidog, a fyddai'n siŵr o ymateb. Wrth gwrs mae yna lwybr arall, sef cyfeirio at yr ombwdsmon, ynghylch y ffordd y mae'r awdurdod lleol y cyfeiriwch chi ato wedi gweithredu. Rwy'n credu y byddai'n amhriodol i mi wneud unrhyw sylw penodol pellach na hynny ar rywbeth nad oes gennyf wybodaeth uniongyrchol yn ei gylch mewn gwirionedd.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. My first question this afternoon is about a matter in my region causing consternation for constituents, but has a national implication. The application of Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd to continue coal extraction operations at the Ffos-y-Frân mine, beyond the original deadline, and mine for another three years, has caused considerable distress to residents due to concerns over air quality and noise pollution. The site is located just meters away from homes, schools and playgrounds. Can the Counsel General confirm whether article 67, section 26A of the Coal Industry Act 1994 gives Welsh Ministers the ultimate responsibility for approving bids for coal mining operations in Wales? Would the Counsel General also confirm whether the December 2018 notification direction obliges councillors to refer bids on coal or petroleum operations to Welsh Ministers? And based on these pieces of legislation, would the Counsel General give a view on whether the Welsh Government is able to refuse the application by Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd to continue coal extraction operations at the Ffos-y-Frân site?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Mae fy nghwestiwn cyntaf y prynhawn yma yn ymwneud â mater yn fy rhanbarth sy'n achosi pryder i etholwyr, ond mae iddo oblygiad cenedlaethol. Mae cais Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd i barhau i gloddio am lo ym mhwll glo Ffos-y-Frân y tu hwnt i'r dyddiad cau gwreiddiol, a chloddio am dair blynedd arall, wedi achosi cryn ofid i drigolion oherwydd pryderon am ansawdd yr aer a llygredd sŵn. Mae'r safle wedi ei leoli ychydig fetrau i ffwrdd o gartrefi, ysgolion a meysydd chwarae. A wnaiff y Cwnsler Cyffredinol gadarnhau a yw erthygl 67, adran 26A o Ddeddf y Diwydiant Glo 1994 yn rhoi'r cyfrifoldeb eithaf i Weinidogion Cymru am gymeradwyo ceisiadau gwaith cloddio glo yng Nghymru? A wnaiff y Cwnsler Cyffredinol gadarnhau hefyd a yw hysbysiad cyfarwyddyd Rhagfyr 2018 yn gorfodi cynghorwyr i gyfeirio ceisiadau ar gyfer gwaith glo neu betroliwm i Weinidogion Cymru? Ac yn seiliedig ar y darnau hyn o ddeddfwriaeth, a wnaiff y Cwnsler Cyffredinol roi safbwynt ar allu Llywodraeth Cymru i wrthod y cais gan Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd i barhau i gloddio am lo ar safle Ffos-y-Frân?
English: Thank you for raising that. You raise some very specific matters that relate to, obviously, planning matters and the powers of Welsh Government. And of course, there are issues that have been raised, for example, in respect of another coal extraction area, and the issues relate, often, to what powers the Welsh Government has, and whether it's in respect of existing planning permissions that have been given or whether it relates to new planning applications, and so on. Look, in respect of the circumstances there, the detail you asked for is not something I can give you today; I think, if you write to me separately, if there are matters I can reply to you specifically on, I will happily do so. But I think it would be improper without knowing the background to it, knowing what stage it might be in the planning system, what other issues there might be, as to whether I can actually respond and in what detail I can respond to you on.
Welsh: Diolch am godi hynny. Rydych yn codi materion penodol iawn sy'n ymwneud â materion cynllunio a phwerau Llywodraeth Cymru. Ac wrth gwrs, mae yna faterion wedi cael eu codi, er enghraifft, mewn perthynas ag ardal gloddio glo arall, a mae'r materion yn ymwneud yn aml â pha bwerau sydd gan Lywodraeth Cymru, ac a yw'n ymwneud â chaniatadau cynllunio sydd eisoes wedi'u rhoi neu a yw'n ymwneud â cheisiadau cynllunio newydd, ac yn y blaen. Edrychwch, ar yr amgylchiadau yno, nid yw'r manylion y gwnaethoch chi ofyn amdanynt yn bethau y gallaf eu rhoi i chi heddiw; os ysgrifennwch ataf ar wahân, os oes materion y gallaf roi ateb penodol i chi arnynt, rwy'n hapus i wneud hynny. Ond rwy'n credu y byddai'n amhriodol imi ymateb heb wybod y cefndir, gwybod ar ba gam y gallai fod arno yn y system gynllunio, pa faterion eraill a allai fodoli, a pha mor fanwl y gallaf fod wrth ymateb i chi.
English: Thank you, Counsel General, and I'll certainly write to you on that. Since the last round of Counsel General's questions, we have received the verdict of the Supreme Court that the Scottish Parliament does not have the power to legislate for a referendum. Does the Counsel General concur with the remarks made by the First Minister in the summer, that there is an unambiguous moral and political case for allowing Scotland to hold an independence referendum? And do you also agree that every nation has a right to self-determination, if that is the democratic wish of the people? Finally, what is the Counsel General's assessment of the impact of sections 60 and 64 of the Government of Wales Act 2006 on the ability of Welsh Government to hold an independence referendum?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Gwnsler Cyffredinol, ac yn sicr, fe wnaf ysgrifennu atoch am hynny. Ers y rownd olaf o gwestiynau i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol, cawsom ddyfarniad y Goruchaf Lys nad oes gan Senedd yr Alban bŵer i ddeddfu ar gyfer cynnal refferendwm. A yw'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol yn cytuno â'r sylwadau a wnaed gan Brif Weinidog Cymru yn yr haf, fod achos moesol a gwleidyddol diamwys dros ganiatáu i'r Alban gynnal refferendwm ar annibyniaeth? Ac a ydych chi hefyd yn cytuno bod gan bob cenedl hawl i hunanbenderfyniaeth, os mai dyna yw dymuniad democrataidd y bobl? Yn olaf, beth yw asesiad y Cwnsler Cyffredinol o effaith adrannau 60 a 64 o Ddeddf Llywodraeth Cymru 2006 ar allu Llywodraeth Cymru i gynnal refferendwm ar annibyniaeth?
English: Thank you, Llywydd. I understand that you've agreed to group questions 3 and 5, but if I could follow on from my colleague Peredur with his question -
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. Dwi'n deall eich bod chi wedi cytuno i uno cwestiwn 3 a chwestiwn 5, ond os caf i felly ddilyn ymlaen o fy nghyfaill Peredur efo'i gwestiwn o -
English: You should ask the question on the order paper. You can read your question -
Welsh: Fe gei di ofyn y cwestiwn ar y papur. Fe gei di ddarllen allan dy gwestiwn di yn y drefn -
English: I will do that, therefore.
Welsh: Iawn, fe wnaf i hynny, felly.
English: Thank you for the question. The judgment was specific to the situation in Scotland. I do not consider that it will have any implications for the interpretation of the Welsh settlement. The Supreme Court was very clear that it was not departing from its previous approach to the consideration of such issues.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiwn. Roedd y dyfarniad yn ymwneud yn benodol â'r sefyllfa yn yr Alban. Nid wyf o'r farn y bydd iddo oblygiadau i'r modd y dehonglir y setliad Cymreig. Roedd y Goruchaf Lys yn glir iawn nad oedd yn gwyro oddi wrth ei ddull blaenorol o ystyried materion o'r fath.