techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: The proposal is to agree the motion without amendment. Does any Member object? [ Objection.] I will defer voting, therefore, under this item until voting time.
Welsh: Y cwestiwn yw: a ddylid derbyn y cynnig heb ei ddiwygio? A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu. [ Gwrthwynebiad.] Gohiriaf y bleidlais, felly, ar yr eitem yma tan y cyfnod pleidleisio.
English: That brings us to the next debate, which is on the prospects for a Brexit deal following the House of Commons vote, and I call the Counsel General and Brexit Minister to move the motion - Jeremy Miles.
Welsh: Daw hyn â ni at y ddadl ar y rhagolygon am gytundeb Brexit yn dilyn y bleidlais yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin, a dwi'n galw ar y Cwnsler Cyffredinol a'r Gweinidog Brexit i wneud y cynnig - Jeremy Miles.
English: I have selected the two amendments to the motion. If amendment 1 is agreed, amendment 2 will be deselected. I call on Neil Hamilton, therefore, to move amendment 1, tabled in the name of Gareth Bennett - Neil Hamilton.
Welsh: Rwyf wedi dethol y ddau welliant i'r cynnig. Os derbynnir gwelliant 1, caiff gwelliant 2 ei ddad-ddethol. Galwaf ar Neil Hamilton, felly, i gynnig gwelliant 1, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Gareth Bennett - Neil Hamilton.
English: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. I beg to move the amendment in the name of my colleague Gareth Bennett. We are at the culmination of two and a half wasted years. When the EU withdrawal Bill was enacted, the leaving date of 29 March was on the face of the Bill, and everybody has known that we've been heading to 29 March in the last two years. It's a shocking dereliction of duty on the part of the United Kingdom Government that we're in the shambles that we are today. Although, I have to say, it was entirely predictable, given that Theresa May was openly going into a cul-de-sac from which she couldn't emerge, because the EU never wanted a deal in the first place; they wanted a British capitulation. We know that Monsieur Barnier said in 2016 that he will have done his job if, at the end of the process, the terms are so bad for Britain that the British people will want to stay in the EU. That is the background to the so-called negotiation that has been undertaken in Brussels. We could've read the book Adults in the Room by Yanis Varoufakis, who set out exactly, with, actually, clear precision, all those years ago, the tactics that would face Theresa May and the British negotiators when they got to Brussels, because he said that the EU negotiators are only concerned with one thing: how to signal to the rest of Europe that anyone who votes in a Government or votes in a referendum in a manner that challenges the authority of the deep establishment in Europe will get crushed. And that is exactly what has happened. I'll give way.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Lywydd. Rwyf am gynnig y gwelliant yn enw fy nghyd-Aelod, Gareth Bennett. Rydym wedi cyrraedd pen draw dwy flynedd a hanner a wastraffwyd. Pan ddaeth y Bil ymadael â'r UE i rym, roedd y dyddiad ymadael sef 29 Mawrth ar wyneb y Bil, ac mae pawb wedi gwybod ein bod yn anelu tuag at 29 Mawrth dros y ddwy flynedd ddiwethaf. Mae'r modd y mae Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig wedi esgeuluso ei dyletswydd yn syfrdanol a dyna pam rydym yn y llanastr rydym ynddo heddiw. Er, rhaid imi ddweud, roedd yn gwbl rhagweladwy, o gofio bod Theresa May yn anelu'n agored am cul-de-sac na allai ddod allan ohono, am nad oedd yr UE eisiau cytundeb yn y lle cyntaf; roeddent am weld ymostyngiad Prydain. Rydym yn gwybod bod Monsieur Barnier wedi dweud yn 2016 y bydd wedi gwneud ei waith os bydd y telerau ar ddiwedd y broses mor wael fel y bydd pobl Prydain eisiau aros yn yr UE. Dyna'r cefndir i'r hyn a elwir yn negodi a wnaed ym Mrwsel. Gallem fod wedi darllen y llyfr Adults in the Room gan Yanis Varoufakis, a nododd yn fanwl gywir, mewn gwirionedd, gydag eglurder mawr, flynyddoedd yn ôl, beth fyddai'r tactegau a fyddai'n wynebu Theresa May a'r negodwyr Prydeinig pan fyddent yn mynd i Frwsel, oherwydd dywedodd mai un peth yn unig sy'n bwysig i negodwyr yr UE: sut i ddangos i weddill Ewrop y bydd unrhyw un sy'n pleidleisio dros Lywodraeth neu sy'n pleidleisio mewn refferendwm mewn modd sy'n herio awdurdod y sefydliad dwfn yn Ewrop yn cael eu darostwng. A dyna'n union beth sydd wedi digwydd. Fe ildiaf.
English: Thank you for taking an intervention. I understand why you're putting that spin on it, but isn't the effect of what you're saying that there is no deal as good as being a member of the European Union?
Welsh: Diolch ichi am dderbyn ymyriad. Rwy'n deall pam y rhowch y sbin hwnnw ar bethau, ond onid effaith yr hyn a ddywedwch yw nad oes unrhyw gytundeb cystal â bod yn aelod o'r Undeb Ewropeaidd?
English: Following yesterday's debate in the House of Commons, it's very evident that we need to prepare for Brexit. Many people watching the debate this day will find it very ironic, actually, that the joint Labour, Plaid, Lib Dem motion before us - because that's what it is, an unholy alliance of three parties in this National Assembly who are wishing to seek to frustrate Brexit - [ Interruption. ] You're seeking to condemn the UK Government for failing to engage in cross-party negotiations in point 1 of this motion, but nothing could be further from the truth. The Prime Minister has invited and held discussions with other political parties, including the leader of Plaid Cymru, including the First Minister of the Welsh Government - [ Interruption. ]
Welsh: Yn dilyn y ddadl ddoe yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin, mae'n amlwg iawn fod angen inni baratoi ar gyfer Brexit. Bydd llawer o'r bobl sy'n gwylio'r ddadl hon heddiw'n ei hystyried hi'n eironig iawn, mewn gwirionedd, fod y cynnig sydd ger ein bron ar y cyd rhwng Llafur, Plaid Cymru, a'r Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol - gan mai dyna beth ydyw, cynghrair ddiurddas o dair plaid yn y Cynulliad Cenedlaethol hwn sy'n dymuno ceisio rhwystro Brexit - [ Torri ar draws. ] Rydych yn ceisio condemnio Llywodraeth y DU am fethu cymryd rhan mewn trafodaethau trawsbleidiol ym mhwynt 1 y cynnig hwn, ond ni allai dim fod ymhellach o'r gwir. Mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi gwahodd ac wedi cynnal trafodaethau â phleidiau gwleidyddol eraill, gan gynnwys arweinydd Plaid Cymru, gan gynnwys Prif Weinidog Llywodraeth Cymru - [ T orri ar draws. ]
English: - and it is the Labour Party's leader, Jeremy Corbyn, who has, thus far, failed to engage.
Welsh: - ac arweinydd y Blaid Lafur, Jeremy Corbyn, sydd, hyd yma, wedi methu cymryd rhan.
English: I'll take one in a moment, Llywydd. It is a disgrace, frankly, that he's been happy to meet with terrorists without conditions in the past, yet he has not been prepared to meet with the Prime Minister until last night when he finally caved in under pressure. I'll take the intervention that came first.
Welsh: Fe gymeraf un mewn eiliad, Lywydd. Mae'n warthus, a dweud y gwir, ei fod wedi bod yn hapus i gyfarfod â therfysgwyr heb amodau yn y gorffennol, ond nad yw wedi bod yn barod i gyfarfod â'r Prif Weinidog tan neithiwr pan ildiodd o'r diwedd o dan bwysau. Fe gymeraf yr ymyriad a ddaeth yn gyntaf.
English: Okay. I'm sure he's been spending some time before the debate psyching himself up for this, but one of the things he said - . He talks about an 'unholy alliance' of Plaid Cymru, Labour and the Liberal Democrats: just last week, the Conservative Party was accusing the Labour Party of tribalism. You can't have both.
Welsh: Iawn. Rwy'n siŵr ei fod wedi treulio rhywfaint o amser cyn y ddadl yn paratoi ar gyfer hyn, ond un o'r pethau a ddywedodd - . Mae'n sôn am 'gynghrair ddiurddas' rhwng Plaid Cymru, Llafur a'r Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol: yr wythnos diwethaf, roedd y Blaid Geidwadol yn cyhuddo'r Blaid Lafur o deyrngarwch llwythol. Ni allwch gael y ddau.
English: Well, look, we've seen the tribalism in this Chamber, and it's very evident for everybody to see. [ Interruption. ] Not only have there been meetings between political leaders, but, of course, the Welsh Government itself has been involved, through the many meetings of the Joint Ministerial Committee, which have included many, many conversations and discussions on Brexit. Now, in point 2 of the motion, the Assembly's being asked to support the extension of the article 50 deadline. We were accused of wanting to kick the can further down the road a few moments ago in terms of the UK Government's position, and, yet, this is kicking the can right down - not just down the road, but on to the next street. You know, the reality is that, last night, during a series of votes, the UK Parliament soundly rejected those calls. A majority of MPs recognise that extending the deadline does absolutely nothing to solve the fundamental disagreements - [ Interruption. ] - that many people have on Brexit. So, voting to seek an extension here in this Chamber today is absolutely futile, and we know what it's motivated by; it's motivated by people who want to frustrate Brexit because they don't agree -
Welsh: Wel, edrychwch, rydym wedi gweld teyrngarwch llwythol yn y Siambr hon, ac mae'n amlwg iawn i bawb ei weld. [ Torri ar draws. ] Nid yn unig fod cyfarfodydd wedi'u cynnal rhwng arweinwyr gwleidyddol, ond wrth gwrs, mae Llywodraeth Cymru ei hun wedi cymryd rhan drwy gyfarfodydd niferus Cyd-bwyllgor y Gweinidogion, sydd wedi cynnwys llawer iawn o sgyrsiau a thrafodaethau ar Brexit. Nawr, ym mhwynt 2 y cynnig, gofynnir i'r Cynulliad gefnogi ymestyn dyddiad gadael erthygl 50. Cawsom ein cyhuddo o fod eisiau cicio'r can ymhellach i lawr y lôn funudau yn ôl o ran safbwynt Llywodraeth y DU, ac eto, dyma gicio'r can yr holl ffordd i lawr - nid dim ond i lawr y ffordd, ond i'r stryd nesaf. Wyddoch chi, y realiti yw bod Senedd y DU, neithiwr, dros gyfres o bleidleisiau wedi gwrthod y galwadau hynny'n bendant. Mae'r rhan fwyaf o ASau yn cydnabod nad yw ymestyn y dyddiad gadael yn mynd i wneud unrhyw beth o gwbl i ddatrys yr anghytundeb sylfaenol - [ T orri ar draws. ] - sydd rhwng llawer o bobl ynglŷn â Brexit. Felly, mae pleidleisio dros geisio estyniad yma yn y Siambr hon heddiw yn gwbl ofer, a gwyddom beth sydd wedi'i ysgogi; mae wedi'i ysgogi gan bobl sydd am rwystro Brexit oherwydd nad ydynt yn cytuno -
English: - with the opinion of the British people, which was expressed in the vote in June 2016. I'll take an intervention.
Welsh: - â barn pobl Prydain, a fynegwyd yn y bleidlais ym mis Mehefin 2016. Fe gymeraf ymyriad.
English: Thank you for taking the intervention. Well, of course, the UK Parliament voted last night that 'no deal' was not an option. In that case, in negotiations with all the parties, a Prime Minister who's been accused of having an open door but a closed mind, do you not think it would be logical for the Prime Minister to now say that 'no deal' is not an option and that she should support the sovereignty of Parliament?
Welsh: Diolch i chi am gymryd yr ymyriad. Wel, wrth gwrs, pleidleisiodd Senedd y DU neithiwr dros ddatgan nad oedd 'dim cytundeb' yn opsiwn. Os felly, mewn trafodaethau gyda'r holl bleidiau, Prif Weinidog a gyhuddwyd o fod â drws agored ond meddwl caeedig, oni chredwch y byddai'n rhesymegol i'r Prif Weinidog ddweud yn awr nad yw 'dim cytundeb' yn opsiwn ac y dylai gefnogi sofraniaeth y Senedd?
English: I will speak briefly about why I believe this motion before us is a valuable one, and why we in Plaid Cymru have been able to come to an agreement on a form of words with the Government, even though there are differences between us on several elements of the Brexit debate. But I think that this is a significant step forward in terms of putting the Assembly's stamp on the Brexit debate, even though it does feel quite hopeless at present that any influence or any emphasis is given to the voice of our national Parliament in this debate. Clause 1 reminds us that this is a Conservative Party project - that's what Brexit is, to all intents and purposes - and that there has been a need from the outset for cross-party talks if the Prime Minister was going to show that any consideration was being given to the opinions of other people. For Darren Millar to say that the Prime Minister has reached out - January 2019 is not the time to do that, when the referendum happened in June 2016. The clause also includes a reference to the need for the devolved administrations to have been listened to clearly from the outset, because there was a valid opinion here that needed to be heard in the debate.
Welsh: Mi siaradaf i yn gymharol fyr am pam dwi'n credu bod hwn - y cynnig sydd o'n blaenau ni heddiw - yn gynnig gwerthfawr a pham ein bod ni, ym Mhlaid Cymru, wedi gallu dod i gytundeb ar ffurf o eiriad efo'r Llywodraeth, er bod yna wahaniaethau rhyngom ni ar sawl elfen o'r drafodaeth ar Brexit. Ond dwi'n credu bod hwn yn gam sylweddol ymlaen o ran gosod stamp y Cynulliad yma ar y drafodaeth Brexit, er mor anobeithiol y mae hi'n teimlo ar adegau fod yna ddylanwad o gwbl ac unrhyw bwys yn cael ei roi i lais ein Senedd genedlaethol ni yn y drafodaeth hon. Mae cymal 1 yn ein hatgoffa ni mai project y Blaid Geidwadol ydy Brexit i bob pwrpas, a bod angen wedi bod o'r dechrau am drafodaethau trawsbleidiol os oedd y Prif Weinidog am ddangos bod yna unrhyw ystyriaeth yn cael ei rhoi i farn eraill. I Darren Millar, sy'n dweud bod y Prif Weinidog wedi estyn allan - nid ym mis Ionawr 2019 y mae'r amser i wneud hynny, pan fo'r refferendwm wedi digwydd ym mis Mehefin 2016. Mae'r cymal yma hefyd yn cynnwys cyfeiriad at yr angen y dylid bod wedi gwrando ar y gweinyddiaethau datganoledig yn berffaith glir o'r dechrau, oherwydd mi oedd yna farn ddilys yma oedd angen cael ei chlywed yn y drafodaeth.
English: Does the Member accept that there have been ongoing discussions between the Welsh Government and the UK Government throughout this Brexit process? I mentioned the joint ministerial council meetings earlier on, in which Brexit has been a constant feature on the agenda. That shows that there's been engagement with the devolved nations in a meaningful way.
Welsh: A yw'r Aelod yn derbyn bod trafodaethau parhaus wedi bod rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru a Llywodraeth y DU drwy gydol proses Brexit? Soniais am gyfarfodydd y cydgyngor gweinidogion yn gynharach, lle mae Brexit wedi bod yn elfen gyson ar yr agenda. Mae hynny'n dangos bod ymgysylltiad â'r gwledydd datganoledig wedi digwydd mewn modd ystyrlon.
English: I appreciate it's an idea and it's a proposal and so on, but will you recognise that, in terms of the position representing the Welsh Assembly, you've got a First Minister who's almost living in Downing Street at the moment trying to engage with UK Government, and, of course, at the inter-parliamentary forum, which is a meeting of all the constitutional and legislative bodies, the Welsh position has been put time and time again by Dai Rees and me, who attend that forum, and even only the other week or so, with Chloe Smith, again presenting that? I don't have a particular objection, but I just wonder what the point is when that position is so clearly put at the moment. It may actually be a distraction from the real issue of constitutional change.
Welsh: Rwy'n derbyn ei fod yn syniad ac yn gynnig ac yn y blaen, ond a wnewch chi gydnabod, o safbwynt cynrychioli Llywodraeth y Cynulliad, mae gennych Brif Weinidog Cymru sydd bron yn byw yn Stryd Downing ar hyn o bryd yn ceisio ymgysylltu â Llywodraeth y DU, ac wrth gwrs, yn y fforwm rhyngseneddol, sef cyfarfod o'r holl gyrff cyfansoddiadol a deddfwriaethol, mae safbwynt Cymru wedi'i roi dro ar ôl tro gan Dai Rees a minnau, sy'n mynychu'r fforwm hwnnw, a hyd yn oed yr wythnos o'r blaen, gyda Chloe Smith, roeddem yn cyflwyno'r safbwynt hwnnw eto? Nid oes gennyf wrthwynebiad penodol, ond tybed beth yw'r pwynt pan fo'r safbwynt hwnnw'n cael ei roi mor glir ar hyn o bryd. Gallai dynnu sylw oddi ar y mater o bwys sef newid cyfansoddiadol.
English: I recognise the point that you make and I recognise the value there has been in some of the contact that there has been. We think there's more that can be done. We encourage innovation in how, you know, in these last few weeks even, we look to maximise leverage for Wales in any way we can. But it's for that reason of thinking maybe there's another way that we can discuss that we will, with your permission, not push this to a vote today, Llywydd, and hopefully we can have further conversations about how we can work innovatively on this. But I think we do have here a motion that we are pleased to be able to table jointly with the Government that again states a clear position by the National Assembly for Wales, standing up for what is right for Wales in the Brexit context.
Welsh: Rwy'n cydnabod y pwynt rydych yn ei wneud ac rwy'n cydnabod gwerth peth o'r cysylltiad a gafwyd. Credwn fod mwy y gellir ei wneud. Rydym yn annog arloesedd o ran y modd, wyddoch chi, yn yr wythnosau diwethaf hyn hyd yn oed, rydym yn ceisio cael y fantais fwyaf i Gymru mewn unrhyw ffordd y gallwn. Ond am y rheswm hwnnw o feddwl efallai fod yna ffordd arall y gallwn drafod hynny, ni fyddwn, gyda'ch caniatâd chi, Lywydd, yn gwthio hyn i bleidlais heddiw a gobeithio y cawn drafodaethau pellach ynglŷn â sut y gallwn weithio mewn modd arloesol ar hyn. Ond credaf fod gennym gynnig yma rydym yn falch o allu ei gyflwyno ar y cyd â'r Llywodraeth sydd eto'n datgan safbwynt clir gan Gynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru, ac sy'n sefyll dros yr hyn sy'n iawn i Gymru yng nghyd-destun Brexit.
English: I thank Rhun ap Iorwerth for his speech. He says that, last night, he was able to agree a form of words for the motion with Welsh Government. I just wonder when Welsh Government were cosying up to Plaid Cymru, who want to break up our United Kingdom, whether they thought of an alternative approach that they might take, one of supporting the UK Government in its negotiating position and going to the European Union and saying, 'We don't want 'no deal', so therefore you need to change your position so that the withdrawal agreement becomes acceptable to the British House of Commons'. When there is a negotiation between the UK Government on one side and the European Commission on the other side, does the Welsh Government not think, are they not concerned about what side they appear to be on when they start a motion with the phrase 'condemns the UK Government'? What does that say about them? They then ludicrously go on to condemn it for its failure to engage in cross-party negotiations, when it is their leader who, until tea time today, was refusing to meet the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom?
Welsh: Diolch i Rhun ap Iorwerth am ei araith. Dywed ei fod, neithiwr, wedi gallu cytuno ar ffurf geiriad o blaid y cynnig gyda Llywodraeth Cymru. Pan oedd Llywodraeth Cymru yn ymwthio i goflaid Plaid Cymru, sydd eisiau chwalu ein Teyrnas Unedig, tybed a oeddent yn meddwl am ffordd arall y gallent ei dewis, un o gefnogi Llywodraeth y DU yn ei safbwynt negodi a mynd at yr Undeb Ewropeaidd a dweud, 'Nid ydym eisiau 'dim cytundeb', felly mae angen i chi newid eich safbwynt fel y daw'r cytundeb ymadael yn dderbyniol i Dy'r Cyffredin Prydain'. Pan fo negodi'n digwydd rhwng Llywodraeth y DU ar un ochr a'r Comisiwn Ewropeaidd ar yr ochr arall, onid yw Llywodraeth Cymru'n credu, onid ydynt yn pryderu ynglŷn â pha ochr y mae'n ymddangos eu bod arni pan fyddant yn dechrau cynnig gyda'r ymadrodd 'yn condemnio Llywodraeth y DU'? Beth y mae hynny'n ei ddweud amdanynt? Maent yn mynd ati wedyn yn chwerthinllyd i'w chondemnio am ei methiant i gymryd rhan mewn trafodaethau trawsbleidiol, pan fo'u harweinydd hwy hyd at amser te heddiw, wedi gwrthod cyfarfod â Phrif Weinidog y Deyrnas Unedig?
English: What is the point of actually having a meeting with a Prime Minister who says, 'Come and meet with me and discuss, but I will not change any of my red lines'? The point now, of course, is that Parliament has said 'no deal' has to come off the table. It has said that, and the question is whether Theresa May will listen to Parliament.
Welsh: Beth yw'r pwynt o gael cyfarfod â Phrif Weinidog sy'n dweud, 'Dewch i gwrdd â mi a thrafod, ond ni fyddaf yn newid unrhyw un o fy llinellau coch'? Y pwynt yn awr, wrth gwrs, yw bod y Senedd wedi dweud bod yn rhaid i 'dim cytundeb' ddod oddi ar y bwrdd. Mae wedi dweud hynny, a'r cwestiwn yw a fydd Theresa May yn gwrando ar y Senedd.
English: The Member is right that the House of Commons has said that, but it said it by 318 votes to 310, and it chose only to say that and express an opinion, and when given the opportunity two or three times to do something about it, voted by a majority twice as large not to and to support the UK Government in its negotiating position to put pressure on the European Union to make alternative arrangements to the backstop, so that there can be a deal that Parliament can vote on and agree. That is the only way to avoid 'no deal' unless, as more and more obviously, debate by debate, we see from those benches you want to reverse the outcome of the referendum, ignore the people in Islwyn or in Merthyr Tydfil who voted 56.4 per cent to leave the European Union. They were told by their Member that they'd got it wrong, and she now thinks they should prepare to vote again until they agree with her, because she somehow is better. I don't agree with that.
Welsh: Mae'r Aelod yn iawn fod Tŷ'r Cyffredin wedi dweud hynny, ond dywedodd hynny o 318 pleidlais i 310, a dewisodd ddweud hynny a mynegi barn, a phan gafodd gyfle ddwy neu dair gwaith i wneud rhywbeth yn ei gylch, pleidleisiodd mwyafrif ddwywaith cymaint i beidio ac i gefnogi Llywodraeth y DU yn ei safbwynt negodi i roi pwysau ar yr Undeb Ewropeaidd i wneud trefniadau amgen ar gyfer y ddarpariaeth wrth gefn, fel bod cytundeb ar gael y gall y Senedd bleidleisio a chytuno yn ei gylch. Dyna'r unig ffordd o osgoi 'dim cytundeb' oni bai, fel y gwelwn yn fwy a mwy amlwg, o un ddadl i'r llall, yn gweld o'r meinciau hynny eich bod am wrthdroi canlyniad y refferendwm, anwybyddu'r bobl yn Islwyn neu ym Merthyr Tudful a bleidleisiodd 56.4 y cant o blaid gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd. Dywedwyd wrthynt gan eu Haelod eu bod yn anghywir, ac yn awr mae hi'n meddwl y dylent baratoi i bleidleisio eto hyd nes y byddant yn cytuno â hi, oherwydd mae hi rywsut yn well. Nid wyf yn cytuno â hynny.
English: I had thought that, in the third part of this motion, actually, the Welsh Government was not willing to call for a second referendum - was using weaselly words that work should begin immediately on preparing for a public vote, whatever that may be; perhaps it was a general election, perhaps they couldn't agree. Perhaps, like the people in the House of Commons, who didn't even dare put an amendment for a second referendum because they know how few MPs support it, that actually they weren't pressing for a second referendum. But we hear from Member after Member that that is what they want. They think the people of Wales got it wrong. They think they are better. They think their voters, their electors, should be made to vote again because they disagree. Well, that is not what we believe on these benches. We had a referendum. We voted to leave in the UK and in Wales. We should respect that result.
Welsh: Roeddwn wedi credu, yn y drydedd ran i'r cynnig hwn mewn gwirionedd, nad oedd Llywodraeth Cymru yn barod i alw am ail refferendwm - roedd yn defnyddio geiriau osgoilyd y dylai gwaith ddechrau ar unwaith ar baratoi ar gyfer pleidlais gyhoeddus, beth bynnag yw hynny; efallai mai etholiad cyffredinol ydyw, efallai na allent gytuno. Fel y bobl yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin, na feiddiodd gyflwyno gwelliant hyd yn oed ar gyfer ail refferendwm oherwydd eu bod yn gwybod cyn lleied o ASau sy'n ei gefnogi, efallai nad oeddent yn pwyso am ail refferendwm mewn gwirionedd. Ond rydym yn clywed gan Aelod ar ôl Aelod mai dyna yw eu dymuniad. Maent yn meddwl bod pobl Cymru yn anghywir. Maent yn credu eu bod yn well. Maent yn credu y dylid gwneud i'w pleidleiswyr, i'w hetholwyr bleidleisio eto oherwydd eu bod yn anghytuno. Wel, nid dyna rydym yn ei gredu ar y meinciau hyn. Cawsom refferendwm. Fe wnaethom bleidleisio dros adael yn y DU ac yng Nghymru. Dylem barchu'r canlyniad hwnnw.