English: Brexit transition ends a month today, and the sheer shambles of the lack of preparedness has been laid bare, I think, by the apparent decision by UK Government to take over the Roadking truck stop in Holyhead to be used as a freight checkpoint from July next year. I'm told that 28 staff have been told they'll lose their jobs, and we need assurances that they'll be re-employed at the new border post. Whilst this might have helped resolve one piece of the Brexit jigsaw, it's created new problems, because the truck stop is a vital part of the port's infrastructure, stopping trucks from having to park all around town. What we needed was a new border development in the Holyhead area, but at this eleventh hour, we're just seeing blind panic, I think, from a UK Government that's paid scant attention to the needs of Holyhead. Part of Holyhead's border infrastructure is still earmarked for Warrington, as far as we know. Can I ask what the Welsh Government knew about the Roadking plans? Take us back to why it was decided that HMRC would take the lead on providing all necessary border posts and port infrastructure for Holyhead. Because as I understand, Welsh Government could have had a role to play here. What assurances were you given by UK Government? Couple all this with the nervousness around the as-yet-untested new electronic checks on exported goods being introduced on 1 January, and we can see the risk Holyhead faces now. It's the best Irish sea crossing, and I get very nervous with all the talk about increasing direct freight between Ireland and continental Europe to avoid land bridge problems. So, what steps can Welsh Government take now to help overcome these problems that remain, and to stop Holyhead port and port jobs from being undermined?
Welsh: Mae trefniadau pontio Brexit yn dod i ben fis i heddiw, ac mae'r llanastr llwyr o'r diffyg parodrwydd wedi cael ei amlygu yn eglur, rwy'n credu, gan benderfyniad ymddangosiadol Llywodraeth y DU i gymryd arhosfan lorïau Roadking yng Nghaergybi drosodd i'w ddefnyddio fel man gwirio nwyddau o fis Gorffennaf y flwyddyn nesaf. Dywedir wrthyf fod 28 o staff wedi cael gwybod y byddan nhw'n colli eu swyddi, ac mae angen sicrwydd arnom ni y byddan nhw'n cael eu hailgyflogi ar y ffin newydd. Er y gallai hyn fod wedi helpu i ddatrys un darn o jig-so Brexit, mae wedi creu problemau newydd, oherwydd mae'r arhosfan lorïau yn rhan hanfodol o seilwaith y porthladd, gan atal lorïau rhag gorfod parcio ym mhob rhan o'r dref. Yr hyn yr oedd ei angen arnom ni oedd datblygiad ffin newydd yn ardal Caergybi, ond ar yr unfed awr ar ddeg hon, rydym ni'n gweld panig dall, rwy'n meddwl, gan Lywodraeth y DU sydd wedi rhoi fawr ddim sylw i anghenion Caergybi. Mae rhan o seilwaith ffin Caergybi yn dal i fod wedi'i chlustnodi ar gyfer Warrington, hyd y gwyddom. A gaf i ofyn beth oedd Llywodraeth Cymru yn ei wybod am y cynlluniau Roadking? Ewch â ni yn ôl at pam y penderfynwyd y byddai Cyllid a Thollau EM yn arwain y gwaith o ddarparu'r holl ffiniau a seilwaith porthladd angenrheidiol ar gyfer Caergybi. Oherwydd, yn ôl yr hyn a ddeallaf, gallai Llywodraeth Cymru fod wedi gallu chwarae rhan yn y fan yma. Pa sicrwydd a roddwyd i chi gan Lywodraeth y DU? Cyplyswch hyn i gyd â'r nerfusrwydd ynghylch yr archwiliadau electronig newydd sydd heb eu profi eto ar nwyddau allforio sy'n cael eu cyflwyno ar 1 Ionawr, a gallwn weld y risg y mae Caergybi yn ei hwynebu nawr. Dyma'r groesfan orau o fôr Iwerddon, ac rwy'n nerfus iawn ynghylch yr holl sôn am gynyddu trefniadau cludo nwyddau uniongyrchol rhwng Iwerddon a chyfandir Ewrop er mwyn osgoi problemau pont dir. Felly, pa gamau all Llywodraeth Cymru eu cymryd nawr i helpu i oresgyn y problemau hyn sy'n parhau, ac i atal porthladd Caergybi a swyddi'r porthladd rhag cael eu tanseilio?