English: Thank you, and thank you for your statement, Minister. I'd also like to thank the Minister for the courtesy that he's shown in meeting with me in advance of this statement. His communication of the broad principles in favour of the childcare funding Bill were very clear and comprehensive and I understand the reasoning behind using HMRC and it does appear to me to be quite sensible. HMRC are already in possession of the relevant data so it does seems a logical choice. I'd also like to compliment the Minister on his implementation of the early testing phase of the childcare offer. His approach on gathering essential data and fine tuning the offer shows that he's approached the programme with strategic thought. A discussion of the administration of the offer by HMRC and outline of these finer details were also very helpful. However, it's on these finer details and the administration arrangements that I and my party have questions and concerns. I note that there was an opposition day debate in the House of Commons on 26 October 2016, brought by the Minister's Labour Party colleague Rebecca Long-Bailey MP, which raised a number of concerns about HMRC's work on tax credits contracted out to a company called Concentrix. It noted that the company had not met performance standards fully set out in its contract with HMRC. It also emphasised the human factor, including the suffering of women and single mothers who erroneously had tax credits withdrawn by the company, acting on behalf of HMRC. The debate achieved the broad consensus of representatives from all parties in the House of Commons, the consensus being that the contractor's performance was not up to standard and it had caused real human suffering. No-one in this place would want to see these problems replicated in the administration of childcare funding in Wales, so to that end I want to conclude by asking the Minister two things. Firstly, will there be an opportunity for both the Assembly as a whole and the appropriate committees to scrutinise the procurement costs and the procurement terms of the programme from HMRC? And, secondly, will there be an opportunity for the Assembly as a whole to assent or not assent to the HMRC using an external contractor to administer the programme? Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch i chi, a diolch ichi am eich datganiad, Gweinidog. Hoffwn hefyd ddiolch i'r Gweinidog am y cwrteisi a ddangosodd yn cyfarfod â mi cyn y datganiad hwn. Llwyddodd i gyfleu yr egwyddorion cyffredinol o blaid y Bil ariannu gofal plant yn glir ac yn gynhwysfawr iawn ac rwy'n deall y rhesymeg o ran defnyddio Cyllid a Thollau EM ac ymddengys i mi yn eithaf synhwyrol. Mae gan Gyllid a Thollau EM eisoes y data perthnasol felly mae hi yn ymddangos yn ddewis rhesymegol. Hoffwn hefyd ganmol y Gweinidog am roi cyfnod arbrofol cynnar y cynnig gofal plant ar waith. Mae sut yr aeth ati i gasglu data hanfodol a mireinio'r cynnig yn dangos ei fod wedi dynesu at y rhaglen â meddwl strategol. Roedd trafodaeth ynglŷn â sut y byddai Cyllid a Thollau EM yn gweinyddu'r cynllun ac amlinelliad o'r manylion hyn hefyd yn ddefnyddiol iawn. Fodd bynnag, mae gennyf fi a'm plaid gwestiynau a phryderon ynglŷn â'r glo mân a'r trefniadau gweinyddu hyn. Nodaf y bu dadl dydd yr wrthblaid yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin ar 26 Hydref 2016, a gyflwynwyd gan gyd-Aelod y Gweinidog yn y Blaid Lafur, sef yr Aelod Seneddol Rebecca Long-Bailey, lle mynegwyd pryderon lu ynghylch gwaith Cyllid a Thollau EM ar gredydau treth a gafodd ei gontractio i gwmni o'r enw Concentrix. Nododd nad oedd y cwmni wedi cyflawni'r safonau perfformiad a nodwyd yn llawn yn ei gontract gyda Chyllid a Thollau EM. Pwysleisiodd hefyd y ffactor dynol, gan gynnwys dioddefaint merched a mamau sengl y diddymwyd eu credydau treth yn ddi-sail gan y cwmni, oedd yn gweithredu ar ran Cyllid a Thollau EM. Enillodd y ddadl gonsensws eang gan gynrychiolwyr o bob plaid yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin, y consensws oedd nad oedd perfformiad y contractwr yn unol â'r safonau disgwyliedig a'i fod wedi achosi dioddefaint dynol gwirioneddol. Ni fyddai unrhyw un yn y lle hwn eisiau gweld y problemau hyn yn cael eu hailadrodd wrth weinyddu ariannu gofal plant yng Nghymru, felly rwyf am gloi drwy ofyn dau beth i'r Gweinidog i'r perwyl hwnnw. Yn gyntaf, a fydd yn gyfle i'r Cynulliad yn ei gyfanrwydd a'r pwyllgorau priodol graffu ar gostau caffael a thelerau caffael y rhaglen gan Gyllid a Thollau EM? Ac, yn ail, a fydd yn gyfle i'r Cynulliad yn ei gyfanrwydd gydsynio neu beidio â chydsynio i Gyllid a Thollau EM ddefnyddio contractwr allanol i weinyddu'r rhaglen? Diolch i chi.