English: I've taken seriously the evidence from the whole sector - from the Welsh Local Government Association, as both providers and commissioners, as well as providers themselves. We've also had engagement with trade union representatives too. So, this is a considered position, having worked with the sector in advance of it. We're moving to a position where lighthouse labs, when it comes to their operation around care homes, are actually improving the turnaround. There are bigger challenges still with in-person testing. We've seen some improvement; we want to see it improve further. And this provides a consistency of provision, because I fully expect that local partners will, as we see high prevalence rates at present, want to move to the more regular weekly testing rather than the fortnightly testing we were able to move to when we had low transmission and prevalence rates in the summer. That then means that our Public Health Wales capacity can be deployed to support community transmission outbreaks, which we know have increased and we know we are likely to need to deal with as we go through the winter. I just remind every Member that we're in a position where we have a joint programme where we have Public Health Wales tests and a significant infrastructure created through a UK paid for and led programme. We're not in a position to simply opt out of that programme and then replace all of that capacity ourselves. It's about money, it's about equipment, it's about people, it's our ability to deliver a system that will work for each of us as best as possible. So, I'm not being complacent about challenges in the lighthouse lab programme, but I recognise and I think that this is the right choice to make to provide some certainty. And indeed, it comes on the back of an improving picture in the way that lighthouse labs are dealing with care home tests.
Welsh: Rwyf wedi rhoi ystyriaeth ddifrifol i'r dystiolaeth o'r sector cyfan - gan Gymdeithas Llywodraeth Leol Cymru, fel darparwyr a chomisiynwyr, yn ogystal â'r darparwyr eu hunain. Rydym wedi ymgysylltu â chynrychiolwyr undebau llafur hefyd. Felly, mae hwn yn safbwynt y daethpwyd iddo ar ôl gweithio gyda'r sector. Rydym yn agosáu at sefyllfa lle mae labordai goleudy, o ran eu gwaith mewn perthynas â chartrefi gofal, yn cyflymu'r broses. Mae heriau mwy yn bodoli o hyd mewn perthynas â chynnal profion personol. Rydym wedi gweld rhywfaint o welliant; rydym am weld hynny'n gwella ymhellach. Ac mae hyn yn darparu cysondeb o ran y ddarpariaeth, gan fy mod yn llwyr ddisgwyl y bydd partneriaid lleol, wrth inni weld cyfraddau uchel ar hyn o bryd, yn awyddus i newid i'r profion wythnosol mwy rheolaidd yn hytrach na'r profion bob pythefnos roeddem yn gallu symud atynt pan oedd gennym gyfraddau achosion a throsglwyddo isel yn yr haf. Golyga hynny wedyn y gellir defnyddio capasiti Iechyd Cyhoeddus Cymru i gefnogi achosion o drosglwyddiad cymunedol, gan y gwyddom eu bod wedi cynyddu a gwyddom ein bod yn debygol o orfod ymdrin â hwy wrth inni fynd drwy'r gaeaf. Hoffwn atgoffa pob Aelod ein bod mewn sefyllfa lle mae gennym raglen ar y cyd gyda phrofion Iechyd Cyhoeddus Cymru a seilwaith sylweddol wedi'i greu drwy raglen y telir amdani ac a arweinir gan y DU. Nid ydym mewn sefyllfa i optio allan o'r rhaglen honno a darparu capasiti yn lle'r holl gapasiti hwnnw ein hunain. Mae'n ymwneud ag arian, mae'n ymwneud ag offer, mae'n ymwneud â phobl, mae'n ymwneud â'n gallu i ddarparu system a fydd yn gweithio mor dda â phosibl i bawb ohonom. Felly, nid wyf yn hunanfodlon ynghylch heriau yn rhaglen y labordai goleudy, ond rwy'n cydnabod ac yn credu mai dyma'r dewis iawn i'w wneud er mwyn darparu rhywfaint o sicrwydd. Ac yn wir, daw hyn yn sgil darlun sy'n gwella o ran y ffordd y mae'r labordai goleudy yn ymdrin â phrofion mewn cartrefi gofal.