English: Thank you, acting Llywydd. As Janet was highlighting, I think we're already adequately funded as it is. The UK Government is not going to increase the Welsh Government budget to support this costly experiment, and so the Welsh Government would have to cut money out of health, education and other budgets in Wales, which, as we have heard repeatedly in this Chamber, are sectors already in dire need. Last week, I visited a primary school in Cardiff whose building is in such a state of repair they've had scaffolding erected for over three years. Black mould covers classroom walls, windows can barely be opened to ventilate the school, there are significant damp problems with cracking and falling plaster, lunchtimes are staggered over two hours because 40 per cent of the playground has been lost to scaffolding, there's almost no natural light in classrooms, there's water leaking close to electrical points, and buckets have to be used to catch rainwater. I question how expanding this basic income pilot is a good use of public money when this Government will allow our nation's children to be educated in such appalling conditions. Might I also remind Members that the basic income is not a devolved matter? We should be encouraging the Government to stop wasting money on these pointless pet projects, and use their time and resources to resolve the issues that they are tasked with, such as trying to resolve the continually falling education standards and dealing with the 700,000 people who are on NHS waiting lists. Acting Llywydd, I see no benefit for the people of Wales in this Government extending their basic income trial and wasting public money in this way. I believe that those workers in industries that are transitioning to zero carbon will not be unjustly impacted. Therefore, I would encourage all Members here to vote against this motion. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd dros dro. Fel y nododd Janet, credaf ein bod eisoes yn cael ein hariannu'n ddigonol fel y mae. Nid yw Llywodraeth y DU yn mynd i gynyddu cyllideb Llywodraeth Cymru i gefnogi'r arbrawf costus hwn, ac felly byddai'n rhaid i Lywodraeth Cymru fynd ag arian o gyllidebau iechyd, addysg a chyllidebau eraill yng Nghymru, sydd, fel y clywsom dro ar ôl tro yn y Siambr hon, yn sectorau sydd eisoes mewn angen dybryd. Yr wythnos diwethaf, ymwelais ag ysgol gynradd yng Nghaerdydd y mae ei hadeilad mewn cyflwr mor wael fel bod sgaffaldiau wedi'u codi yno ers dros dair blynedd. Mae llwydni du yn gorchuddio waliau ystafelloedd dosbarth, prin y gellir agor ffenestri i awyru'r ysgol, ceir problemau lleithder sylweddol gyda phlastr wedi cracio'n disgyn, mae amser cinio wedi'i wasgaru dros ddwy awr oherwydd bod 40 y cant o'r iard chwarae dan sgaffaldiau, nid oes bron ddim golau naturiol mewn ystafelloedd dosbarth, mae dŵr yn gollwng yn agos at bwyntiau trydanol, ac mae'n rhaid defnyddio bwcedi i ddal dŵr glaw. Rwy'n cwestiynu sut y mae ehangu'r cynllun peilot incwm sylfaenol hwn yn ddefnydd da o arian cyhoeddus pan fo'r Llywodraeth hon yn caniatáu i blant ein gwlad gael eu haddysgu mewn amodau mor ofnadwy. A gaf fi atgoffa'r Aelodau hefyd nad yw'r incwm sylfaenol yn fater sydd wedi'i ddatganoli? Dylem annog y Llywodraeth i roi'r gorau i wastraffu arian ar y prosiectau dibwrpas hyn, a defnyddio'u hamser a'u hadnoddau i ddatrys y materion y mae ganddynt gyfrifoldeb i'w datrys, megis ceisio datrys y safonau addysg sy'n gostwng yn barhaus ac ymdrin â'r 700,000 o bobl sydd ar restrau aros y GIG. Lywydd Dros Dro, ni welaf unrhyw fudd i bobl Cymru o fod y Llywodraeth hon yn ymestyn eu treial incwm sylfaenol a gwastraffu arian cyhoeddus yn y ffordd hon. Nid wyf yn credu yr effeithir yn annheg ar weithwyr mewn diwydiannau sy'n newid i fod yn ddi-garbon. Felly, hoffwn annog pob Aelod yma i bleidleisio yn erbyn y cynnig hwn. Diolch.