English: Thank you, Llywydd. Whilst this first supplementary budget is relatively limited in nature, representing as it does - if you don't include the pensions money - just over 0.5 per cent of the Welsh Government's budget, it is nonetheless an important part of the budget process, allowing changes to be reported and scrutinised by the Assembly. I'll turn first to the issue that was raised by most speakers, and that is the issue of the pensions and the £36 million funding gap that exists in terms of the money that was handed down from Westminster. As I mentioned in my written statement to colleagues, I have written to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury expressing deep concerns that the proposed funding doesn't meet the full costs associated with those changes. I did so in partnership with Scotland and with the Permanent Secretary of Northern Ireland. We were very clear that the transparency and engagement that there has been relating to this decision has in no way lived up to the statement of funding policy that has been agreed by the nations. Mike Hedges mentioned the appeals procedure that has been set out. Well, we were very clear in our letter that if a meeting wasn't forthcoming very quickly to discuss these issues with the Chief Secretary to the Treasury then we would jointly be seeking to use that appeals process to take this matter further forward. None of this lives up to the kind of relationship that we were promised that we would have with the UK Government in terms of funding and transparency. It's for that reason that I can't confirm future years' funding either for pensions, because that will be discussed as part of the comprehensive spending review. Issues were raised around in-year monitoring of the devolved tax forecasts. The Welsh Government will be monitoring the in-year tax receipts information from the Welsh Revenue Authority to inform our developing view of the likely full-year position for 2019-20, and that forms part of our overall in-year financial management system. But, there is little information in-year available at this point to inform revised forecasts, and the situation will develop as the year progresses. The Office for Budget Responsibility will publish revised forecasts for 2019-20, both for devolved taxes and for the associated UK taxes in the autumn. The impact of these revisions on the tax revenues and block grant adjustment will then be taken into account, and you will see them reflected in the second supplementary budget later on. The issue of the Scotland income tax black hole was also raised. Based on current forecasts, the Scottish Government budgets over the last few years have overstated the net position between devolved income tax revenues and the associated block grant adjustments. As a result, there will be reconciliation payments over the next few years. There was some interest in this during committee scrutiny, and I was able to say that we are in a different position to Scotland in the sense that we have different powers devolved to us in relation to income tax. So, we are less exposed in some ways, and also we have the Office for Budget Responsibility doing our forecasts, as they do across England. So, we shouldn't have that divergence in methodology that is involved in those forecasts. That said, I would not seek to overstate the situation because, clearly, we would want to keep a very close eye on it. With regard to the M4, the situation is that £20 million was earmarked in reserves this year for the M4, should the decision have been made to make the orders, and that £20 million remains in reserves now to be deployed elsewhere, in terms of meeting our Government priorities. So, there are no additional allocations made in this supplementary budget for costs associated with future steps. However, current estimates are that, for the fast-track measures that the First Minister set out to alleviate congestion on the M4 around Newport, including additional traffic officers, increased live journey time information and a behaviour awareness campaign, the cost will be between £4 million and £5 million over the next two years. We'll be keeping this under review, allocating 2019-20 funding again at the second supplementary budget. I was very clear in committee that the First Minister has made it clear that the commission will have first call on the funding that had been previously earmarked for the M4. Clearly, the commission is about to start its work, so I couldn't be in the position in the first supplementary budget to allocate further funding, or to be clearer in terms of where the funding might be deployed in future in terms of meeting the recommendations of that commission. There was a great deal of interest in the debate and also in committee scrutiny in terms of the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015, and how we are ensuring that that's very much embedded in our budget-setting process. Of course, the draft and final budgets set out our Government spending plans for 2019-20 and the first supplementary budget builds on those plans and the delivery of our commitments. I'll give you an example of the additional funding for the economy futures fund. One of the streams in that fund is specifically related to decarbonisation, and I know that the Minister has taken a close interest in that in terms of considering how he will deploy those funds. So, it is very much at the centre of our thinking. I've already met with the future generations commissioner in terms of how we improve our consideration of the well-being of future generations Act in our future budget setting, and we're working on developing a journey checker, which, again, I know is something that the Finance Committee has taken a strong interest in, and that work is ongoing. And I've taken an interest, again, in the commissioner's suggestions for additional funding that she would like to see deployed in 2020-21 and I look forward to meeting with her to discuss her proposals further and understanding where she would see those additional funds coming from across Government in terms of refocusing priorities and also understanding better what the carbon savings would be from each of the measures that are proposed. I look forward to continuing those discussions with her. But, just to close, Llywydd, looking forward, the UK Government indicated previously that it would set budgets for three years through a comprehensive spending review. Our current revenue settlement doesn't extend beyond this year, although we do have a capital budget for next year. But what this supplementary budget does is put in place a firm foundation for the current year. The public finances and terms of our settlement from the UK Government remain uncertain and it could mean that there might be more difficult budgetary decisions lying ahead. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Mae'r gyllideb atodol gyntaf hon yn gymharol gyfyngedig ei natur, gan ei bod yn cynrychioli - os nad ydych chi'n cynnwys yr arian pensiynau - ychydig dros 0.5 y cant o gyllideb Llywodraeth Cymru. Serch hynny, mae'n rhan bwysig o broses y gyllideb, gan ganiatáu i'r Cynulliad adrodd ar newidiadau a chraffu arnyn nhw. Trof yn gyntaf at y mater a godwyd gan y rhan fwyaf o'r siaradwyr, sef mater y pensiynau a'r bwlch cyllid o £36 miliwn sydd i'w weld o ran yr arian a drosglwyddwyd o San Steffan. Fel y soniais yn fy natganiad ysgrifenedig i fy nghyd-Aelodau, rwyf i wedi ysgrifennu at Brif Ysgrifennydd y Trysorlys yn mynegi pryderon mawr nad yw'r cyllid arfaethedig yn talu'r holl gostau sy'n gysylltiedig â'r newidiadau hynny. Fe wnes i hynny mewn partneriaeth â'r Alban a gydag Ysgrifennydd Parhaol Gogledd Iwerddon. Roeddem yn glir iawn bod y tryloywder a'r ymgysylltu a welwyd mewn cysylltiad â'r penderfyniad hwn ymhell o fod yn cydymffurfio â'r datganiad o bolisi ariannu a gytunwyd gan y gwledydd. Soniodd Mike Hedges am y drefn apelio sydd wedi'i hamlinellu. Wel, roeddem ni'n glir iawn yn ein llythyr y byddem yn mynd ati ar y cyd i ddefnyddio'r broses apelio honno i fynd â'r mater hwn ymhellach pe na fyddai cyfarfod yn cael ei gynnal yn fuan iawn i drafod y materion hyn gyda Phrif Ysgrifennydd y Trysorlys. Nid oes unrhyw ran o hyn yn agos at y math o berthynas a addawyd y byddai gennym gyda llywodraeth y DU o ran cyllid a thryloywder. Oherwydd hynny, ni allaf gadarnhau cyllid ar gyfer pensiynau yn y dyfodol, oherwydd bydd hynny'n cael ei drafod yn rhan o'r adolygiad cynhwysfawr o wariant. Codwyd materion ynghylch monitro'r rhagolygon treth ddatganoledig yn ystod y flwyddyn. Bydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn monitro'r wybodaeth am dderbynebau treth yn ystod y flwyddyn gan Awdurdod Cyllid Cymru er mwyn llywio ein barn ddatblygol o'r sefyllfa flwyddyn lawn debygol ar gyfer 2019-20, ac mae hynny'n ffurfio rhan o'n system rheolaeth ariannol gyffredinol yn ystod y flwyddyn. Ond, prin yw'r wybodaeth yn ystod y flwyddyn sydd ar gael ar hyn o bryd i lywio'r rhagolygon diwygiedig, a bydd y sefyllfa'n datblygu wrth i'r flwyddyn fynd rhagddi. Bydd y Swyddfa Cyfrifoldeb Cyllidebol yn cyhoeddi rhagolygon diwygiedig ar gyfer 2019-20, ar gyfer trethi datganoledig a threthi cysylltiedig y DU yn yr hydref. Yna, bydd effaith y diwygiadau hyn ar y refeniw treth a'r addasiad i'r grant bloc yn cael eu hystyried, a byddwch yn eu gweld yn cael eu hadlewyrchu yn yr ail gyllideb atodol yn ddiweddarach. Codwyd mater y twll du yn y dreth incwm yn yr Alban hefyd. Yn seiliedig ar ragolygon cyfredol, mae cyllidebau Llywodraeth yr Alban yn ystod y blynyddoedd diwethaf wedi gorbwysleisio'r sefyllfa net rhwng refeniw treth incwm datganoledig a'r addasiadau cysylltiedig i'r grant bloc. O ganlyniad i hyn, bydd taliadau cysoni yn ystod y blynyddoedd nesaf. Bu rhywfaint o ddiddordeb yn hyn yn ystod gwaith craffu'r pwyllgor, ac roeddwn i'n gallu dweud ein bod ni mewn sefyllfa wahanol i'r Alban gan fod pwerau gwahanol wedi'u datganoli i ni mewn cysylltiad â threth incwm. Felly, rydym ni'n llai agored mewn rhai ffyrdd, ac mae gennym y Swyddfa Cyfrifoldeb Cyllidebol yn gwneud ein rhagolygon, fel y maen nhw'n ei wneud ledled Lloegr. Felly, ni ddylai fod gennym y gwahaniaeth hwnnw yn y fethodoleg sy'n gysylltiedig â'r rhagolygon hynny. Wedi dweud hynny, ni fyddwn i'n ceisio gorbwysleisio'r sefyllfa oherwydd, yn amlwg, byddem ni'n dymuno cadw llygad barcud arni. O ran yr M4, y sefyllfa yw bod £20 miliwn wedi ei glustnodi mewn cronfeydd wrth gefn eleni ar gyfer yr M4, pe byddai'r penderfyniad wedi'i wneud i wneud y gorchmynion, ac mae'r £20 miliwn hwnnw yn parhau i fod mewn cronfeydd wrth gefn bellach i'w ddefnyddio yn rhywle arall, o ran bodloni blaenoriaethau ein Llywodraeth. Felly, ni wneir unrhyw ddyraniadau ychwanegol yn y gyllideb atodol hon ar gyfer costau sy'n gysylltiedig â chamau yn y dyfodol. Fodd bynnag, yn ôl amcangyfrifon cyfredol, ar gyfer y mesurau carlam y mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi'u gosod i liniaru tagfeydd ar yr M4 o amgylch Casnewydd, gan gynnwys swyddogion traffig ychwanegol, mwy o wybodaeth fyw am amseroedd teithio ac ymgyrch i godi ymwybyddiaeth o ymddygiad, bydd y gost rhwng £4 miliwn a £5 miliwn dros y ddwy flynedd nesaf. Byddwn yn cadw golwg ar hyn, gan ddyrannu cyllid 2019-20 eto yn yr ail gyllideb atodol. Roeddwn i'n glir iawn yn y pwyllgor fod y Prif Weinidog wedi'i gwneud yn glir y bydd y comisiwn yn cael y cynnig cyntaf am yr arian a glustnodwyd yn flaenorol ar gyfer yr M4. Yn amlwg, mae'r comisiwn ar fin dechrau ar ei waith, felly nid oeddwn i'n gallu bod mewn sefyllfa yn y gyllideb atodol gyntaf i ddyrannu rhagor o gyllid, nac i fod yn gliriach o ran lle y gellid defnyddio'r cyllid yn y dyfodol o ran bodloni argymhellion y comisiwn hwnnw. Roedd cryn dipyn o ddiddordeb yn y ddadl ac wrth graffu ar waith y pwyllgor o ran Deddf Llesiant Cenedlaethau'r Dyfodol (Cymru) 2015, a'r ffordd yr ydym ni'n sicrhau bod honno wedi ei hymwreiddio'n helaeth yn ein proses o bennu'r gyllideb. Wrth gwrs, mae'r cyllidebau drafft a therfynol yn nodi cynlluniau gwario'r Llywodraeth ar gyfer 2019-20 ac mae'r gyllideb atodol gyntaf yn datblygu ar y cynlluniau hynny ac ar gyflawni ein hymrwymiadau. Rhoddaf enghraifft i chi o'r cyllid ychwanegol ar gyfer cronfa dyfodol yr economi. Mae un o'r ffrydiau yn y gronfa honno'n ymwneud yn benodol â datgarboneiddio, a gwn y bu gan y Gweinidog gryn ddiddordeb yn hynny o ran ystyried sut y bydd yn defnyddio'r arian hwnnw. Felly, mae wrth galon ein meddylfryd i raddau helaeth. Rwyf eisoes wedi cwrdd â chomisiynydd cenedlaethau'r dyfodol o ran sut y byddwn yn gwella ein hystyriaeth o'r Ddeddf llesiant cenedlaethau'r dyfodol wrth bennu cyllidebau yn y dyfodol, ac rydym yn gweithio ar ddatblygu trefn asesu'r daith sydd, unwaith eto, yn rhywbeth y gwn y bu gan y Pwyllgor Cyllid gryn ddiddordeb ynddo, ac mae'r gwaith hwnnw'n mynd rhagddo. Ac rwyf innau wedi cymryd diddordeb, unwaith eto, yn awgrymiadau'r comisiynydd am gyllid ychwanegol yr hoffai ei weld yn cael ei ddefnyddio yn 2020-21 ac rwy'n edrych ymlaen at gyfarfod â hi i drafod ei chynigion ymhellach a deall o ble y byddai'n awgrymu i'r cyllid ychwanegol hwnnw ddod o bob rhan o'r Llywodraeth o ran newid pwyslais blaenoriaethau a deall yn well beth fyddai'r arbedion carbon o bob un o'r mesurau a gynigir. Rwy'n edrych ymlaen at barhau â'r trafodaethau hynny â hi. Ond, dim ond gair i gloi, Llywydd, wrth edrych ymlaen, nododd Llywodraeth y DU yn flaenorol y byddai'n pennu cyllidebau am dair blynedd trwy adolygiad cynhwysfawr o wariant. Nid yw ein setliad refeniw presennol yn ymestyn y tu hwnt i eleni, er bod gennym ni gyllideb gyfalaf ar gyfer y flwyddyn nesaf. Ond mae'r gyllideb atodol hon yn gosod sylfaen gadarn ar gyfer y flwyddyn gyfredol. Mae cyllid cyhoeddus a thelerau ein setliad gan Lywodraeth y DU yn parhau'n ansicr a gallai olygu y bydd mwy o benderfyniadau cyllidebol anodd yn y dyfodol. Diolch.