English: Well, there are a number of questions there, aren't there, that deserve further consideration. First of all, I'm not tasked with putting the permanent body in place. Clearly, that's an issue for the Welsh Government. What I can do, however, is to provide feedback on the process and what's happened during the past 18 months, and I very much look forward to doing that with Welsh Government so that they can learn from my experiences over the past 18 months in terms of helping to develop that more permanent body that will be put in place. I do meet regularly - very regularly, in fact - with the Office for Environmental Protection and Environmental Standards Scotland, and those meetings have been very useful indeed. During our establishment period, they've helped with the processes that we've put in place, also the availability of experts that we need to look at various different issues, and also in terms of prioritisation and looking at issues that are perhaps relevant to us all, because the environment doesn't respect any borders, of course. And those meetings have been very positive. They've been very open and transparent, and I do think that the opportunity to do that has been very useful for me in terms of this role during the past 18 months, but also I think that the experiences that those bodies have, having been established over the last 18 months, that the experiences that they have will be of great use to the Welsh Government as they put legislation in place for a permanent body for us here in Wales. In terms of risk, it's very difficult to discuss that in any great detail as to what the risk entails. Of course, there have been cases brought to my attention that have been outwith my scope to deal with. So, there are some six issues that have been drawn to my attention that looked at a breach of environmental law or a possible breach of law. Now, clearly, that's not within the scope of my role at the moment, and that perhaps would have been something that would have fallen within the scope of the previous arrangement. But there's nothing to suggest that those would have been cases that would have been taken forward either and that there would have been further reports or recommendations on them. I can only consider what's been put in front of me and what's within my remit, of course. In terms of other factors, we do look at risk as a factor that we consider in prioritising issues. So, in terms of things that are within my scope to deal with, then risk is one of the things that we do look at in detail - what is the risk of any weaknesses within the law for the environment and the risk from those weaknesses not being mitigated or changed. So, we do look at risk in that context. I'm not sure if that's answered all of your questions there.
Welsh: So, mae sawl cwestiwn fanna, onid oes e, i efallai ystyried ymhellach. So, yn gyntaf oll, dwi ddim gyda'r dasg o roi'r corff parhaol mewn lle. Yn amlwg, mae hwnna'n fater i Lywodraeth Cymru. Beth dwi yn gallu ei wneud, er hynny, yw rhoi adborth ar y broses a beth sydd wedi bod yn digwydd yn ystod y 18 mis diwethaf, a dwi'n disgwyl ymlaen yn fawr at wneud hynny gyda Llywodraeth Cymru er mwyn iddyn nhw gael dysgu, efallai, o'r profiad dwi wedi'i gael dros y 18 mis diwethaf yn nhermau helpu, efallai, i ddatblygu'r corff mwy parhaol fydd gennym ni. Dwi yn cyfarfod yn gyson iawn gyda'r Office for Environmental Protection ac Environmental Standards Scotland. Mae'r cyfarfodydd yna wedi bod yn ddefnyddiol iawn yn ystod y cyfnod o sefydlu, yn helpu gyda'r prosesau dŷn ni wedi rhoi yn eu lle, hefyd argaeledd arbenigwyr sydd eu hangen arnom ni ar gyfer edrych ar wahanol faterion a hefyd blaenoriaethu, ac edrych hefyd ar faterion efallai sydd yn berthnasol i ni i gyd edrych arno, achos, wrth gwrs, dyw amgylchedd ddim yn gweld dim un ffin. Mae'r cyfarfodydd yna wedi bod yn gadarnhaol. Maen nhw wedi bod yn rhai agored, tryloyw iawn, a dwi'n credu bod y cyfle i wneud hynny wedi bod yn ddefnyddiol iawn i fi yn nhermau'r rôl yma yn ystod y 18 mis diwethaf, ond hefyd dwi'n credu bod y profiad sydd gan y cyrff hynny sydd wedi bod yn sefydlu dros y 18 mis diwethaf, fod y profiad sydd ganddyn nhw, hefyd yn mynd i fod o werth ac yn adnodd hefyd i Lywodraeth Cymru wrth iddyn nhw roi deddfwriaeth mewn lle ar gyfer corff parhaol i ni yng Nghymru. O ran risg, mae'n anodd iawn i drafod hwnna mewn manylder, am beth yw'r risg. Yn amlwg, mae yna achosion wedi dod at fy sylw i sydd wedi bod allan o'n sgôp i ddelio â nhw. So, mae yna ryw chwech mater wedi dod at fy sylw i a oedd yn edrych ar dorri cyfraith amgylcheddol neu'r posibilrwydd fod yna dorcyfraith wedi bod. Yn amlwg, dyw hynny ddim o fewn sgôp fy rôl i ar hyn o bryd, a byddai hynna efallai wedi bod yn rhywbeth fyddai wedi bod yn sgôp y trefniant oedd gyda ni cyn hynny. Ond does dim byd i gadarnhau y byddai'r rheini wedi bod yn achosion y byddai wedi cael eu dwyn ymlaen chwaith ac a fyddai wedi mynd i fod yn achosion byddai yna adroddiadau neu argymhellion pellach wedi cael eu gwneud arnyn nhw. Dwi ond yn gallu ystyried beth sydd wedi dod o'm mlaen i ac sydd o fewn y sgôp sydd gyda fi. O ran ffactorau hefyd, dŷn ni yn edrych ar risg fel un o'r ffactorau dŷn ni'n eu hystyried wrth flaenoriaethu materion. So, yn nhermau pethau sydd o fewn fy sgôp i i ddelio â nhw, mae risg yn un o'r pethau dŷn ni yn crybwyll ac yn edrych arno yn fanwl - beth yw'r risg o unrhyw wendidau o fewn y gyfraith efallai i'r amgylchedd o beidio â chael y gwendidau yna wedi cael eu hadfer neu eu newid. Felly, dŷn ni yn edrych ar risg o safbwynt hynny hefyd. Dwi ddim yn siŵr a ydy hynny yn ateb i gyd o'r cwestiynau rŷch chi wedi eu gofyn yn fanna.