techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Can I give the leader of Plaid Cymru an assurance that the education Secretary is in the process, as I said, of looking to introduce an improved grant that suits families' needs better, something which supports better access to curriculum activities and learning opportunities that might otherwise be denied to learners due to cost? A number of councils have already confirmed they will continue to run the year 7 school uniform scheme, or run similar schemes, in 2018-19. While the school uniform grant is certainly helpful for families, it was also inflexible because the money could only be used for school uniforms, and I know that what we are looking to introduce in September will be a scheme that is broader than that and looks to help low income families with so many of the costs of education.
Welsh: A gaf i roi sicrwydd i arweinydd Plaid Cymru bod yr Ysgrifennydd dros Addysg yn y broses, fel y dywedais, o geisio cyflwyno gwell grant a fydd yn diwallu anghenion teuluoedd yn well, rhywbeth sy'n cynorthwyo gwell mynediad at weithgareddau cwricwlwm a chyfleoedd dysgu a allai gael ei gwadu i ddysgwyr fel arall oherwydd y gost? Mae nifer o gynghorau eisoes wedi cadarnhau y byddan nhw'n parhau i redeg y cynllun gwisg ysgol blwyddyn 7, neu redeg cynlluniau tebyg, yn 2018-19. Er bod y grant gwisg ysgol yn sicr o gymorth i deuluoedd, roedd hefyd yn anhyblyg oherwydd na ellid defnyddio'r arian heblaw am ar gyfer gwisgoedd ysgol yn unig, a gwn y bydd yr hyn yr ydym yn bwriadu ei gyflwyno ym mis Medi yn gynllun sy'n ehangach na hwnnw ac yn ceisio helpu teuluoedd incwm isel gyda chymaint o gostau addysg.
English: We'll shortly be launching a £1.1 million food business investment scheme package of grant aid specifically to help small and medium-sized slaughterhouses in Wales. That will enable such businesses, which are often in remote areas, to invest in competitiveness, and also to ensure their resilience and, of course, to make sure that they are sustainable in the long term.
Welsh: Yn fuan, byddwn yn lansio pecyn cynllun buddsoddi mewn busnesau bwyd gwerth £1.1 miliwn o gymorth grant yn benodol i helpu lladd-dai bach a chanolig eu maint yng Nghymru. Bydd hynny'n galluogi busnesau o'r fath, sy'n aml mewn ardaloedd anghysbell, i fuddsoddi mewn cystadleurwydd, a hefyd i sicrhau eu cydnerthedd ac, wrth gwrs, i wneud yn siŵr eu bod yn gynaliadwy yn yr hirdymor.
English: I thank you for your answer, First Minister. I hope we all want to see high standards of animal welfare in our slaughterhouses, and that, of course, goes for independent abattoirs as well. I know the one in my own constituency takes great pride in the respectful way in which they treat animals. I'm aware that the Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs is still looking at CCTV in slaughterhouses, and it seems that no decision has yet been made. Can I ask what specific financial support you will offer to slaughterhouses, and independent abattoirs in particular, for the installation of CCTV should the Cabinet Secretary make the decision in that regard?
Welsh: Diolchaf i chi am eich ateb, Prif Weinidog. Rwy'n gobeithio ein bod ni i gyd eisiau gweld safonau uchel o les anifeiliaid yn ein lladd-dai, ac mae hynny, wrth gwrs, yn wir am ladd-dai annibynnol hefyd. Gwn fod yr un yn fy etholaeth i yn falch iawn o'r modd parchus y maen nhw'n trin anifeiliaid. Rwy'n ymwybodol bod Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros faterion gwledig yn dal i ystyried teledu cylch cyfyng mewn lladd-dai, ac mae'n ymddangos nad oes penderfyniad wedi ei wneud eto. A gaf i ofyn pa gymorth ariannol penodol y byddwch chi'n ei gynnig i ladd-dai, a lladd-dai annibynnol yn benodol, ar gyfer gosod teledu cylch cyfyng pe byddai Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn gwneud penderfyniad yn hynny o beth?
English: Well, that's what this grant can be used for. What we will not do is impose CCTV before abattoirs in Wales are ready. In England, of course, we know this is moving ahead on a compulsory basis. We want Wales's slaughterhouses to be fully prepared. We don't rule it out, but, at this stage, what is hugely important is that there's assistance for abattoirs to be ready, if that is the direction that we take.
Welsh: Wel, dyna y gellir defnyddio'r grant hwn ar ei gyfer. Yr hyn na wnawn ni ei wneud yw gorfodi teledu cylch cyfyng cyn bod lladd-dai yng Nghymru yn barod. Yn Lloegr, wrth gwrs, rydym ni'n gwybod bod hyn yn symud ymlaen ar sail orfodol. Rydym ni eisiau i ladd-dai Cymru fod yn gwbl barod. Nid ydym yn ei ddiystyru, ond, ar hyn o bryd, yr hyn sy'n hynod bwysig yw bod cymorth i ladd-dai fod yn barod, os mai dyna'r cyfeiriad y byddwn ni'n ei ddilyn.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. First Minister, when devolution came into being in 1999 we said at that time that things were going to be different, politics was going to be different. This morning, your Government, and you in particular, wrote a letter to the Presiding Officer indicating that you were minded to seek a legal judgment from the court to stop a debate in this Chamber taking place tomorrow. The only place we can find any comparable comparisons is the country of Egypt, where the executive tries to stop the legislature debating and discussing and voting on a motion that comes before it that is deemed in competence. Why are you trying to silence the Assembly?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, pan ddigwyddodd datganoli ym 1999, dywedasom bryd hynny bod pethau'n mynd i fod yn wahanol, bod gwleidyddiaeth yn mynd i fod yn wahanol. Y bore yma, ysgrifennodd eich Llywodraeth, a chi yn benodol, lythyr at y Llywydd yn nodi eich bod yn bwriadu ceisio dyfarniad cyfreithiol gan y llys i atal dadl yn y Siambr hon rhag cael ei chynnal yfory. Yr unig le y gallwn ni ddod o hyd i unrhyw gymariaethau tebyg yw gwlad yr Aifft, lle mae'r weithrediaeth yn ceisio atal y ddeddfwrfa rhag dadlau a thrafod a phleidleisio ar gynnig sy'n dod ger ei bron yr ystyrir ei fod yn gymwys. Pam ydych chi'n ceisio tawelu'r Cynulliad?
English: Well, the leader of the opposition is wrong. There is actually no power to prevent a debate happening in this Chamber except that which resides in the hands of the Presiding Officer. That's not what the letter's about.
Welsh: Wel, mae arweinydd yr wrthblaid yn anghywir. Nid oes unrhyw rym i atal dadl rhag cael ei chynnal yn y Siambr hon mewn gwirionedd, ac eithrio'r hyn sydd yn nwylo'r Llywydd. Nid dyna y mae'r llythyr yn ymwneud ag ef.
English: As I understand it, First Minister, from the letter that you sent to the Presiding Officer, you seem to deem yourself outside the scope of the Government of Wales provision, and therefore you do not feel that you are bound by the provisions within the Government of Wales Act, and that is what you will be seeking a judgment from the court on if you seek that route. That, in effect, places you above the law, if you take your interpretation to the extreme, because you are saying your Ministers are bound by the provisions within the Government of Wales Act but you yourself are not. Now, surely, First Minister, you should allow this debate to go ahead tomorrow, allow the debate, because it's deemed to be in competence - it's on the order paper - and I would seek confirmation from you today that you will not try and intervene and stop this debate taking place tomorrow afternoon.
Welsh: Fel y deallaf, Prif Weinidog, o'r lythyr a anfonwyd gennych chi at y Llywydd, mae'n ymddangos eich bod yn ystyried eich hun y tu allan i gwmpas darpariaeth Llywodraeth Cymru, ac felly nid ydych chi'n teimlo eich bod chi wedi eich rhwymo gan y darpariaethau yn Neddf Llywodraeth Cymru, a dyna beth y byddwch chi'n gofyn am ddyfarniad gan y llys arno os byddwch yn dilyn y llwybr hwnnw. Mae hynny, i bob pwrpas, yn eich rhoi chi uwchlaw'r gyfraith, os cymerwch chi eich dehongliad i'r eithaf, gan eich bod yn dweud bod eich Gweinidogion wedi eu rhwymo gan y darpariaethau yn Neddf Llywodraeth Cymru, ond nad ydych chi eich hun. Nawr, does bosib, Prif Weinidog, na ddylech chi ganiatáu i'r ddadl hon gael ei chynnal yfory, caniatáu'r ddadl, oherwydd ystyrir ei bod yn gymwys - mae ar y papur trefn - ac rwyf yn gofyn am gadarnhad gennych chi heddiw na fyddwch chi'n ceisio ymyrryd ac atal y ddadl hon rhag cael ei chynnal brynhawn yfory.
English: I have no power to intervene to stop the debate taking place; that's a matter for the Presiding Officer. And also the leader of the opposition inadvertently misleads the Assembly when he claims the effect of section 37, as we interpret it, is to put the First Minister beyond the law. It is not. The interpretation that we place on section 37 is that it applies specifically to Welsh Ministers and not to the functions of the First Minister. Now, that is an issue that is hugely important in law - it's hugely important. Now, if something is in dispute in terms of the law, it's perfectly proper that clarity is sought as to how the law operates. We can't operate in a slapdash way; we have to make sure we have clarity for Government and, indeed, for the Assembly.
Welsh: Nid oes gen i unrhyw rym i ymyrryd i atal y ddadl rhag cael ei chynnal; mater i'r Llywydd yw hynny. Ac mae arweinydd yr wrthblaid hefyd yn camarwain y Cynulliad yn anfwriadol pan ei fod yn honni mai effaith adran 37, fel yr ydym yn ei dehongli, yw rhoi'r Prif Weinidog y tu hwnt i'r gyfraith. Nid yw'n gwneud hynny. Y dehongliad yr ydym ni'n ei wneud o adran 37 yw ei bod yn berthnasol i Weinidogion Cymru yn benodol ac nid i swyddogaethau'r Prif Weinidog. Nawr, mae hwnnw'n fater sy'n hynod bwysig yn y gyfraith - mae'n eithriadol o bwysig. Nawr, os oes anghydfod ynghylch rhywbeth o ran y gyfraith, mae'n gwbl briodol y dylid ceisio cael eglurhad ynghylch sut y mae'r gyfraith yn gweithredu. Ni allwn weithredu mewn ffordd ffwrdd â hi; Mae'n rhaid i ni sicrhau bod gennym ni eglurder ar gyfer y Llywodraeth ac, yn wir, ar gyfer y Cynulliad.
English: First Minister, I never thought I'd stand in this Chamber and find us debating these types of points, or discussing these types of points, where you - you - as First Minister, because it's your signature on the bottom of that letter, are trying to prevent a debate coming forward tomorrow because you want to seek a judgment of the court to prevent that happening. Now, you have said time and time again that the substance of the debate tomorrow, which is the leak inquiry report, is in the ownership of the Permanent Secretary, and it is for her to determine whether that report should come forward. Why are you intervening now to try and stop that report coming forward? Because, if that report became public and people could form an opinion, with suitable redactions, which is what we've called for in the motion tomorrow, to protect the identity of any witnesses who wish that identity to be protected, people could form an opinion on that report. Instead, today - the first day back after the Easter recess - we are looking at you as First Minister who has sent a letter to the Presiding Officer, trying to silence the Assembly. That is the wrong way to do democracy here in Wales.
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, chredais i erioed y byddwn i'n sefyll yn y Siambr hon ac yn ein canfod yn dadlau'r mathau hyn o bwyntiau, neu'n trafod y mathau hyn o bwyntiau, lle'r ydych chi - chi - fel y Prif Weinidog, oherwydd eich llofnod chi sydd ar waelod y llythyr hwnnw, yn ceisio atal dadl rhag cael ei chynnal yfory gan eich bod chi eisiau ceisio dyfarniad y llys i atal hynny rhag digwydd. Nawr, rydych chi wedi dweud dro ar ôl tro mai'r Ysgrifennydd Parhaol sy'n gyfrifol am sylwedd y ddadl yfory, sef adroddiad yr ymchwiliad i ddatgeliadau answyddogol, ac mai ei chyfrifoldeb hi yw penderfynu ar ba un a ddylai'r adroddiad hwnnw gael ei gyhoeddi. Pam ydych chi'n ymyrryd nawr i geisio atal yr adroddiad hwnnw rhag cael ei gyhoeddi? Oherwydd, pe byddai'r adroddiad hwnnw yn cael ei gyhoeddi ac y gallai pobl ffurfio barn, gyda'r golygiadau priodol, sef yr hyn yr ydym wedi galw amdano yn y cynnig yfory, i guddio manylion adnabod unrhyw dystion sy'n dymuno i'r manylion hynny gael eu diogelu, gallai pobl ffurfio barn ar yr adroddiad hwnnw. Yn hytrach, heddiw - y diwrnod cyntaf yn ôl ar ôl toriad y Pasg - rydym ni'n edrych arnoch chi fel Prif Weinidog, sydd wedi anfon llythyr at y Llywydd, yn ceisio tawelu'r Cynulliad. Mae honno'r ffordd anghywir i sicrhau democratiaeth yma yng Nghymru.
English: It misleads the Assembly to suggest that we have the power to stop the Presiding Officer allowing a debate. That's not what the situation is here. Now, let me explain what the situation actually - . [ Interruption.]
Welsh: Mae'n camarwain y Cynulliad i awgrymu bod y grym gennym ni i atal y Llywydd rhag caniatáu dadl. Nid dyna'r sefyllfa yn y fan yma. Nawr, gadewch i mi egluro beth yw'r sefyllfa mewn gwirionedd - . [ Torri ar draws.]
English: I am interested in hearing the First Minister's response.
Welsh: Mae gen i ddiddordeb mewn clywed ymateb y Prif Weinidog.
English: Allow the First Minister to be heard.
Welsh: Gadewch i'r Prif Weinidog gael ei glywed.
English: The problem is that sounds like a threat, First Minister, and the questions of openness and transparency are not going to go away. They cut to the very heart of democracy, and if there are so many problems with the Wales Act why have they only now been identified? These matters, we'll be coming back to them, but I want to ask you about the question of Syria. Does the First Minister support military intervention in Syria?
Welsh: Y broblem yw bod hynna'n swnio fel bygythiad, Prif Weinidog, ac nid yw'r cwestiynau ynghylch bod yn agored a thryloyw yn mynd i ddiflannu. Maen nhw wrth union wraidd democratiaeth, ac os oes cymaint o broblemau gyda Deddf Cymru, pam mai dim ond nawr y maen nhw wedi eu darganfod? Y materion hyn, byddwn yn dychwelyd atyn nhw, ond hoffwn eich holi am fater Syria. A yw'r Prif Weinidog yn cefnogi ymyrraeth filwrol yn Syria?
English: I received a phone call at midnight on Saturday morning from Downing Street. I received a briefing from the Prime Minister. It was clear what the action was going to be. I made clear to her my concern that I feared there would be civilian casualties, given the complicated mosaic on the ground in Syria. That doesn't seem to have happened. But my concern, and it was made to her at the time - . I was very concerned that it wouldn't be possible to take any action without civilian casualties and that was something that I wanted to avoid.
Welsh: Cefais alwad ffôn am hanner nos fore Sadwrn gan Downing Street. Derbyniais friff gan y Prif Weinidog. Roedd yn eglur beth oedd y camau'n mynd i fod. Eglurais wrthi fy mhryder fy mod i'n ofni y byddai sifiliaid yn cael eu hanafu, o ystyried y mosaig cymhleth a geir ar lawr gwlad yn Syria. Nid yw'n ymddangos bod hynny wedi digwydd. Ond fy mhryder i, ac fe'i mynegwyd iddi ar y pryd - . Roeddwn i'n bryderus iawn na fyddai'n bosibl gweithredu heb anafu sifiliaid ac roedd hynny'n rhywbeth yr oeddwn i eisiau ei osgoi.
English: My party is committed to opposing these tokenistic, American-led air strikes, and I'd like to remind the First Minister that the road to peace is rarely paved with the weapons of war. Now, the effectiveness in terms of stopping Syrian suffering is far from clear. The Prime Minister herself has said that these strikes were not intended to change the course of the war in Syria and end the suffering of the Syrian people. Without a single vote cast in this Parliament, Westminster, or anywhere else, the First Minister was quick to show his support for those air strikes. So, can he now tell this Assembly: does he believe that Westminster should be able to start wars without any parliamentary approval?
Welsh: Mae fy mhlaid i wedi ymrwymo i wrthwynebu'r cyrchoedd awyr symbolaidd hyn, dan arweiniad America, a hoffwn atgoffa'r Prif Weinidog mai anaml y bydd y ffordd i heddwch yn cael ei hadeiladu drwy arfau rhyfel. Nawr, mae'r effeithiolrwydd o ran atal dioddefaint yn Syria ymhell o fod yn eglur. Mae Prif Weinidog y DU ei hun wedi dweud na fwriadwyd i'r cyrchoedd hyn newid trywydd y rhyfel yn Syria a rhoi terfyn ar ddioddefaint pobl Syria. Heb i un bleidlais gael ei bwrw yn y Senedd hon, yn San Steffan, nac yn unrhyw le arall, roedd y Prif Weinidog yn gyflym iawn i ddangos ei gefnogaeth i'r cyrchoedd awyr hynny. Felly, a all ef ddweud wrth y Cynulliad hwn nawr: a yw e'n credu y dylai San Steffan allu dechrau rhyfeloedd heb unrhyw gymeradwyaeth seneddol?
English: Well, it's not a war, because that prerogative lies with the monarch. It is military action; that is true. Well, there is a precedent for it. David Cameron asked for a vote in Parliament, and it's a matter for the current Prime Minister to explain as to why there wasn't a vote this time around. There are great dangers here. Syria is complicated. There's no doubt in my mind there was a chemical attack, and anything that removes the capability of such an attack occurring in the future is something I would support. What I would be extremely sceptical of would be an acceleration or escalation of military action in Syria, which would lead, to my mind, inevitably to civilian casualties, and that, of course, would be a propaganda boost for those countries that are already in Syria and who themselves have a case to answer for what they're doing.
Welsh: Wel, nid yw'n rhyfel, oherwydd mae'r uchelfraint hwnnw'n perthyn i'r Frenhines. Mae yn weithredu milwrol; mae hynny'n wir. Wel, mae cynsail ar ei gyfer. Gofynnodd David Cameron am bleidlais yn y Senedd, a mater i'r Prif Weinidog presennol yw esbonio i ni pam nad oedd pleidlais y tro hwn. Ceir peryglon mawr yma. Mae Syria yn gymhleth. Nid oes unrhyw amheuaeth yn fy meddwl i y bu ymosodiad cemegol, ac mae unrhyw beth sy'n cael gwared ar y gallu i gynnal ymosodiad o'r fath yn y dyfodol yn rhywbeth y byddwn i'n ei gefnogi. Yr hyn y byddwn yn amheus iawn yn ei gylch fyddai cyflymu neu gynyddu gweithredu milwrol yn Syria, a fyddai'n arwain, yn fy marn i, yn anochel at anafiadau i sifiliaid, ac, wrth gwrs, a fyddai'n hwb i bropaganda'r gwledydd hynny sydd eisoes yn Syria ac sydd ag achos i'w ateb eu hunain am yr hyn y maen nhw'n ei wneud.
English: But that risk is there now, isn't it? 'So for me it's not a question of bombing in Iraq and then bombing in Syria - I don't see much of a difference.' Those were the complacent words of the First Minister when the prospect of British bombs being dropped on Syria first arose back in 2015. He supported bombing campaigns in Syria then, and he supports them now. Yesterday, the First Minister's London Labour boss questioned the legality, the morality and the effectiveness of the strikes. Does the First Minister harbour the same concerns, or does he stand by his comments in support for the Prime Minister and her air strikes in the British national interest?
Welsh: Ond mae'r risg honno yno nawr, onid yw? Felly i mi nid yw'n gwestiwn o fomio yn Irac ac yna bomio yn Syria - nid wyf i'n gweld llawer o wahaniaeth. Dyna oedd geiriau hunanfodlon y Prif Weinidog pan gododd y posibilrwydd o ollwng bomiau Prydeinig ar Syria gyntaf yn ôl yn 2015. Cefnogodd ymgyrchoedd bomio yn Syria bryd hynny, ac mae'n eu cefnogi nhw nawr. Ddoe, cwestiynwyd cyfreithlondeb, moesoldeb ac effeithiolrwydd y cyrchoedd gan fos Llafur y Prif Weinidog yn Llundain. A oes gan y Prif Weinidog yr un pryderon, neu a yw'n cadw at ei sylwadau yn cefnogi Prif Weinidog y DU a'i chyrchoedd awyr er budd cenedlaethol Prydain?
English: Well, firstly, I have no reason to doubt the soundness of the legal advice. On the issue of morality - well, we are talking here about a chemical attack that occurred on defenceless civilians, and if an attack means that the capability of repeating that is no longer there, then, yes, I would support that. Yes, I would support that.
Welsh: Wel, yn gyntaf, nid oes gen i unrhyw reswm i amau cadernid y cyngor cyfreithiol. O ran moesoldeb - wel, rydym ni'n sôn yma am ymosodiad cemegol a ddigwyddodd ar sifiliaid diamddiffyn, ac os yw ymosodiad yn golygu nad yw'r gallu i ailadrodd hynny yn bodoli mwyach, yna, byddwn, byddwn yn cefnogi hynny. Byddwn, mi fyddwn yn cefnogi hynny.
English: That's not the case.
Welsh: Nid yw hynny'n wir.
English: The third point, then, is effectiveness - well, time will tell. Time will tell. What I would not support is any military action that would put the lives of civilians at risk. That's a propaganda boon to other countries - a propaganda boost. But there was a chemical attack by the Assad regime; of that, I am convinced. Secondly, I believe that these missile launches were designed to reduce or remove the capacity for a chemical attack in the future. That surely must be something that should be welcomed in order to avoid those attacks happening in the future. But in terms of escalation, no, there are no great dangers of that.
Welsh: Y trydydd pwynt, felly, yw effeithiolrwydd - wel, amser a ddengys. Amser a ddengys. Yr hyn na fyddwn yn ei gefnogi fyddai unrhyw gamau milwrol a fyddai'n peryglu bywydau sifiliaid. Mae hynny'n fantais propaganda i wledydd eraill - hwb propaganda. Ond bu ymosodiad cemegol gan weithrediaeth Assad; rwyf wedi fy argyhoeddi o hynny. Yn ail, rwy'n credu mai bwriad lansio'r taflegrau hyn oedd lleihau neu gael gwared ar y gallu i gynnal ymosodiad cemegol yn y dyfodol. Does bosib nad yw hynny'n rhywbeth y dylid ei groesawu er mwyn atal yr ymosodiadau hynny rhag digwydd yn y dyfodol. Ond o ran cynyddu gweithredu milwrol, na, nid oes unrhyw beryglon mawr o hynny.
English: As I listened to the First Minister's tortuous, legalistic response to the leader of the opposition earlier on, I was reminded of Denis Healy's first law of holes, that when in one, the best thing to do is to stop digging. Another international comparison of the position that the First Minister seems to find himself in today is the Watergate affair. He'll remember that it wasn't the break-in that actually brought down Richard Nixon, but the attempted cover-up. The President in that case said that when the President does it, it's not illegal. Does the First Minister really want to go down in history as the 'Tricky Dicky' of Welsh politics?
Welsh: Wrth i mi wrando ar ar ymateb troellog, mewn iaith gyfreithiol y Prif Weinidog i arweinydd yr wrthblaid yn gynharach, cefais fy atgoffa o reol gyntaf Denis Healy am dyllau, sef pan eich bod chi mewn un, y peth gorau i'w wneud yw rhoi'r gorau i balu. Mae mater Watergate yn gymhariaeth ryngwladol arall â'r sefyllfa yr ymddengys bod y Prif Weinidog yn canfod ei hun ynddi heddiw. Bydd yn cofio nad y lladrad oedd pen y daith i Richard Nixon, ond yr ymgais i'w gelu. Yn yr achos hwnnw, dywedodd yr Arlywydd nad yw'n anghyfreithlon pan fo'r Arlywydd yn ei wneud. A yw'r Prif Weinidog wir eisiau cael ei gofio mewn hanes fel 'Tricky Dicky' gwleidyddiaeth Cymru?
English: Well, this is the man who defends Enoch Powell. This is the man who defends Enoch Powell, and he seeks to lecture us on morality. 'Have a good look at yourself' is my response to that. No-one suggests that anybody is above the law, but I'd be interested to know whether there's anything that I said with which he disagrees.
Welsh: Wel, dyma'r gŵr sy'n amddiffyn Enoch Powell. Dyma'r gŵr sy'n amddiffyn Enoch Powell, ac mae'n ceisio pregethu i ni am foesoldeb. 'Edrychwch yn ofalus arnoch chi eich hun' yw fy ymateb i hynny. Nid oes unrhyw un yn awgrymu bod unrhyw un uwchlaw'r gyfraith, ond byddai gen i ddiddordeb mewn cael gwybod a oes unrhyw beth a ddywedais y mae e'n anghytuno ag ef.