English: Minister, now that the available options are narrowing, I would appreciate clarity about how far the Welsh Government would be willing to go in order to avoid a 'no deal' scenario. There will be a series of indicative votes in Westminster this week, and Plaid Cymru MPs will be prioritising holding a people's vote as the only sustainable way of solving the crisis. But our MPs have also signed a revocation amendment intended to force the UK Government to revoke article 50 if 'no deal' is otherwise inevitable. This would allow us to avert the immediate crisis so that a new path could be found for dealing with the issue of our relationship with the EU, including a post-revocation people's vote with an option to remain for good or to leave on specific terms. Would Welsh Government also support revocation as an emergency call to stop the train of state from careering off a 'no deal' cliff into disaster? And, on that point, could I ask the Minister whether he is among the 3,600 people and counting from the Neath constituency who have signed the petition to revoke article 50? It's possible, however, that the UK Government will get behind a procedure that would allow it to form a consensus by taking various options off the table one by one until a majority can be formed behind one route. My colleague Jonathan Edwards MP proposed this idea months ago and suggested an alternative votes system could be used to achieve this aim. Finally, if this were to happen and Parliament were able to agree a way forward, does the Welsh Government agree it would be prudent to extend article 50 for however long it takes to renegotiate with the EU on whatever basis is agreed to achieve this? If so, does the Welsh Government agree that this would mean it would be necessary for the UK to take part in the European elections in May?
Welsh: Gweinidog, nawr bod y dewisiadau sydd ar gael yn culhau, byddwn yn gwerthfawrogi eglurder o ran pa mor bell fyddai Llywodraeth Cymru yn barod i fynd er mwyn osgoi sefyllfa 'dim cytundeb'. Bydd cyfres o bleidleisiau dangosol yn San Steffan yr wythnos hon, a bydd ASau Plaid Cymru yn rhoi blaenoriaeth i gynnal pleidlais y bobl fel yr unig ffordd gynaliadwy o ddatrys yr argyfwng. Ond mae ein ASau hefyd wedi llofnodi gwelliant dirymu a fwriedir i orfodi Llywodraeth y DU i ddirymu erthygl 50 petai 'dim cytundeb' yn anochel fel arall. Byddai hyn yn caniatáu inni osgoi'r argyfwng am ryw hyd fel y gellid dod o hyd i lwybr newydd ar gyfer ymdrin â mater ein perthynas â'r UE, gan gynnwys pleidlais y bobl ar ôl dirymu gyda dewis i barhau am byth neu i adael ar delerau penodol. A fyddai Llywodraeth Cymru hefyd yn cefnogi dirymu fel galwad brys i achub y trên gwladwriaethol rhag rhuthro oddi ar glogwyn 'dim cytundeb' i drychineb? Ac, ar y pwynt hwnnw, a gaf i ofyn i'r Gweinidog pa un a yw ef ymhlith y 3,600 o bobl, a disgwylir y bydd mwy, o etholaeth Castell-nedd sydd wedi llofnodi'r ddeiseb i ddirymu erthygl 50? Mae'n bosibl, fodd bynnag, y bydd Llywodraeth y DU yn cefnogi gweithdrefn a fyddai'n caniatáu iddi ffurfio consensws drwy dynnu gwahanol ddewisiadau oddi ar y bwrdd fesul un tan y gellir ffurfio mwyafrif y tu ôl i un llwybr. Cynigiodd fy nghyd-Aelod Jonathan Edwards AS y syniad hwn fisoedd yn ôl ac awgrymodd y gellid defnyddio system pleidleisio amgen i gyflawni'r nod hwn. Yn olaf, pe byddai hyn yn digwydd a bod y Senedd yn gallu cytuno ar ffordd ymlaen, a yw Llywodraeth Cymru yn cytuno y byddai'n ddoeth i ymestyn erthygl 50 am ba gyfnod bynnag y byddai'n cymryd i ail-negodi â'r UE ar ba sail bynnag a gytunir i gyflawni hynny? Os felly, a yw Llywodraeth Cymru yn cytuno y byddai hyn yn golygu y byddai angen i'r DU gymryd rhan yn yr etholiadau Ewropeaidd ym mis Mai?