English: Excellent. I will start again, therefore. Raising standards and raising the status of the profession is something that Plaid Cymru has been calling for for many years. If the workforce isn't given quality training throughout their career, from the initial teacher training up to retirement from the sector, then standards won't improve in our classrooms. Before turning to one issue that's been discussed here on a number of occasions, namely supply teachers and their part in the process, I also want to touch on the issue Suzy raised on the £15 million, and whether it would have been better for that funding to go straight into the core budget, rather than being a specific grant. Now, I sympathise with you, because I've just said that I do think that we need to invest in professional learning. But, of course, it is an exceptionally difficult period for our local authorities, and the WLGA have said that they would very much prefer to see that £15 million being spent on retaining posts - either 350 experienced teachers or over 600 teaching assistants - as would have been the case if this funding had been included within the core budget. I do recognise your dilemma: you want to spend the money in the right place, but, on the other hand, it is a period of crisis and our schools need every penny to retain their experienced teachers. So, I would just ask you to consider and to dwell on that a little. To turn specifically now to supply teachers, there are four times more private agencies for supply teachers now than there were just a few years ago, and there are concerns about pay and conditions and professional development for these teachers, with very many schools increasingly reliant on supply teachers to cover teacher absences. It's crucial, therefore, that those supply teachers also get training and that their information about curriculum developments is up to date. In a statement by you recently on the Government website, it was stated that professional learning will be available to all practitioners in schools, not just teachers, so I would like to know whether there will be provision for supply teachers too and how you're going to ensure that that works. The statement also says that funding will ensure that the changes are made in a way that will prioritise the welfare of teachers and will have as little a disruptive effect on pupil learning as possible, and that the funding will help to ensure that staff are released for professional learning too. So, can you expand on how that is going to happen? Is that inevitably going to lead to more reliance on supply teachers? So, on those specific points and your comments on the core budget against the grant. Thank you.
Welsh: Ardderchog. Fe wnaf ddechrau eto, felly. Mae codi safonau a chodi statws y proffesiwn yn rhywbeth y mae Plaid Cymru wedi bod yn galw amdano fo ers nifer o flynyddoedd. Os nad ydy'r gweithlu yn cael hyfforddiant o safon uchel drwy gydol eu gyrfa, o'u haddysg gychwynnol hyd at gyfnod ymddeol o'r sector, fydd y safonau ddim yn codi yn y dosbarth. Cyn troi at fater sydd wedi cael ei drafod yn fan hyn nifer o weithiau, sef athrawon llanw a'u rhan nhw yn y broses yma, rydw i eisiau cyffwrdd hefyd ar y mater yr oedd Suzy yn ei godi ynglŷn â'r £15 miliwn o arian, ac a fyddai fo wedi bod yn well i'r arian fynd yn syth i'r gyllideb graidd yn hytrach na chael ei roi fel grant benodol. Rŵan, rydw i'n cydymdeimlo â chi, achos rydw i newydd ddweud fy mod i'n meddwl bod angen buddsoddi i gael y dysgu proffesiynol yma'n digwydd yn iawn, ond, wrth gwrs, mae hi'n gyfnod eithriadol o anodd ar y cynghorau sir, ac mae'r gymdeithas llywodraeth leol wedi dweud y byddai'n llawer iawn gwell ganddyn nhw weld y £15 miliwn yn cael ei wario ar gadw swyddi - un ai dros 350 o athrawon profiadol neu dros 600 o gymorthyddion dysgu - fel y byddai'r achos wedi bod petai'r cyllid yma wedi cael ei gynnwys o fewn y gyllideb graidd. Rydw i'n gweld eich dilema chi: rydych chi eisiau gwario'r arian yn y lle iawn, ond, ar y llaw arall, mae hi'n gyfnod o argyfwng ac mae ein hysgolion ni angen pob ceiniog er mwyn cadw'r athrawon profiadol - felly, jest gofyn ichi jest ystyried ychydig ar hynny unwaith yn rhagor. Ond i droi yn benodol rŵan at athrawon llanw, mae yna bedair gwaith mwy o asiantaethau preifat ar gyfer athrawon llanw rŵan nag oedd yna ychydig o flynyddoedd yn ôl, ac mae yna bryderon ynglŷn â thâl ac amodau a datblygiad proffesiynol yr athrawon yma, efo llawer o ysgolion yn dibynnu'n gynyddol ar athrawon llanw i lenwi absenoldebau athrawon. Mae'n hollbwysig, felly, onid ydy, bod yr athrawon llanw hefyd yn derbyn hyfforddiant a bod eu gwybodaeth o ddatblygiadau yn y cwricwlwm yn gyfoes. Mewn datganiad gennych chi'n ddiweddar ar wefan y Llywodraeth, mi ddywedwyd y bydd dysgu proffesiynol yn hawl i bob ymarferwyr mewn ysgolion, nid athrawon yn unig, felly hoffwn i wybod a fydd yna ddarpariaeth ar gyfer athrawon llanw hefyd a sut rydych chi'n mynd i sicrhau bod hynny'n digwydd. Mae'r datganiad yn dweud hefyd y bydd arian yn sicrhau bod y newidiadau'n cael eu gwneud mewn ffordd a fydd yn blaenoriaethu lles athrawon ac yn aflonyddu cyn lleied â phosib ar ddysgu'r disgyblion, a bydd yr arian yn helpu sicrhau bod staff yn cael eu rhyddhau ar gyfer dysgu proffesiynol hefyd. Felly, a fedrwch chi ymhelaethu ar sut y mae hynny'n mynd i ddigwydd? Ac a ydy hynny, yn anorfod, yn mynd i arwain at ragor o ddibyniaeth ar athrawon llanw? Felly, y pwynt penodol yna, os gwelwch yn dda, a'ch sylwadau chi ynglŷn â'r gyllideb graidd yn erbyn grant. Diolch.