English: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. It's so disheartening to hear the Welsh Conservatives state, week after week, that they think that Wales is somehow overfunded, or even sufficiently funded, and I would ask the Welsh Conservatives just to do their own research and to consider some of the facts, the figures, the responsibilities. Look at the historic underfunding of rail in Wales, for example. Ask yourselves if you can be satisfied with that. Look at the way in which HS2 is being categorised by the UK Government as a Wales-and-England scheme, even though the UK Government's own figures show it will be detrimental to Wales, and especially south-west Wales, and ask yourselves if you're satisfied with that. And consider whether you're content that the new border control points should not attract any additional funding from the UK Government, even though they are new and unfunded as the result of Brexit. Consider whether you think that free ports in Wales should only attract £8 million of funding, compared to every free port in England having £25 million. If you're content and satisfied with all of that, you explain that to your constituents. But if, after considering the facts and the funding and the responsibilities, you're as angry as we are on these benches, then do something about this and work with us to put your influence on your colleagues in Westminster to make this right. The Barnett formula was never designed for this; £600 million over 10 to 15 years is a huge amount of funding, and where will it come from? It will come from schools, it will come from hospitals, it will come from road maintenance and it will come from social housing. It doesn't come from thin air. I want to put on record and give a little bit of clarity around the £31 million that was described as well. So, that was an amount of funding I negotiated with the UK Government that if the UK Government deemed that we couldn't afford to spend that at the end of the financial year then it would provide the additional funding. It was a form of guarantee, and it was very helpful because it allowed us to have that certainty and that confidence to move on and make plans and investments in the immediate aftermath. However, colleagues will be aware that Welsh Government had significant funding at the end of the financial year as a result of late announcements of COVID consequentials from the UK Government and also our better management of finances here in Wales in respect of test, trace, protect and personal protective equipment, for example. And, as such, the UK Government netted off that £31 million from the COVID fund, therefore not providing that additional funding. So, I think it's worth just having the facts on that. What I don't want to do today in these discussions that we've been having about coal tips is to cause alarm, and that's something that I think is really important, because we've been gaining a very good and better understanding of our coal tips across Wales, and we now have a much, much better picture of the number and their current status, and we've obviously established a robust inspection and maintenance regime by working with the Coal Authority - UK Coal Authority - and local authorities. The inspection programme ensures that those tips are regularly inspected and any maintenance work is identified and carried out within set time frames to mitigate as many risks as possible. And the next round of winter inspections on the higher risk tips will commence next week and will be carried out jointly by the Coal Authority and local authorities. So, I want to provide that reassurance to communities who might have been unsettled by the focus that is on coal tips at the moment. In addition to this, we're also piloting new technological trials on selected tips, trialling, for example, sensor equipment that is placed on the tips to monitor movement, as well as satellite imagery to remotely measure soil moisture levels below ground. And if anybody is concerned about a tip in their locality, including the drainage systems, then there is a freephone helpline that they can call, and an e-mail address, on the Welsh Government's website. And following the storms and the landslips back in Tylorstown and Wattstown, we did provide a letter of comfort to local authorities so that they could get on and undertake that immediate safety work without having to worry about where the funding was coming from, and I think that that was welcomed by local authorities too. So, let's just reflect finally that these communities have made significant sacrifices in terms of the coal industry, not least through the coal tips but also in so many other ways in terms of the health impacts that these communities are still feeling, and I think it's really time to recognise that this does predate devolution and it's time, really, to show our commitment jointly, with the UK Government, to these communities. I was really, actually, heartened by Darren Millar's comments today in the First Minister's statement on inter-governmental relations. He said, 'I and my colleagues on the Welsh Conservative benches completely agree that there needs to be a joint, collaborative approach to addressing the concerns given that they area legacy from the pre-devolution era.' So, Darren Millar recognised that this is a pre-devolution issue, and Darren Millar recognised that the UK Government also has a role to play in this. I do think that this is an opportunity now for all of us, cross-party, to send a really strong message to the UK Government. Surely, this is something that the people in Wales, and especially in those coal-mining communities, would expect us to do and deserve for us to do on a cross-party basis. Diolch.
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Mae'n fy nigalonni i glywed y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig yn dweud, wythnos ar ôl wythnos, eu bod yn credu bod Cymru rywsut yn cael ei gorariannu, neu hyd yn oed yn cael ei hariannu'n ddigonol, a byddwn i'n gofyn i Geidwadwyr Cymru wneud eu hymchwil eu hunain ac ystyried rhai o'r ffeithiau, y ffigurau, y cyfrifoldebau. Edrychwch ar danariannu hanesyddol y rheilffyrdd yng Nghymru, er enghraifft. Gofynnwch i chi'ch hun a allwch chi fod yn fodlon â hynny. Edrychwch ar y ffordd y mae HS2 yn cael ei gategoreiddio gan Lywodraeth y DU fel cynllun Cymru a Lloegr, er bod ffigurau Llywodraeth y DU ei hun yn dangos y bydd yn niweidiol i Gymru, ac yn enwedig y de-orllewin, a gofynnwch i chi'ch hun a ydych chi'n fodlon â hynny. Ac ystyriwch a ydych chi'n fodlon na ddylai'r pwyntiau rheoli ffiniau newydd ddenu unrhyw gyllid ychwanegol gan Lywodraeth y DU, er eu bod yn newydd a heb eu hariannu o ganlyniad i Brexit. Ystyriwch a ydych chi'n credu y dylai porthladdoedd rhydd yng Nghymru ddenu dim ond £8 miliwn o gyllid, o'i gymharu â phob porthladd rhydd yn Lloegr sy'n cael £25 miliwn. Os ydych chi'n hapus ac yn fodlon ar hynny i gyd, eglurwch chi hynny i'ch etholwyr. Ond os ydych chi, ar ôl ystyried y ffeithiau a'r cyllid a'r cyfrifoldebau, mor ddig ag yr ydym ni ar y meinciau hyn, yna gwnewch rywbeth am hyn a gweithiwch gyda ni i ddylanwadu ar eich cydweithwyr yn San Steffan i wneud hyn yn iawn. Ni chafodd fformiwla Barnett erioed ei gynllunio ar gyfer hyn; mae £600 miliwn dros 10 i 15 mlynedd yn swm enfawr o gyllid, ac o ble y bydd yn dod? Bydd yn dod o ysgolion, bydd yn dod o ysbytai, bydd yn dod o gynnal a chadw ffyrdd a bydd yn dod o dai cymdeithasol. Nid yw'n dod o'r unlle. Rwyf eisiau cofnodi a rhoi ychydig o eglurder ynghylch y £31 miliwn a ddisgrifiwyd hefyd. Felly, roedd hwnnw'n swm o arian a negodwyd gennyf i gyda Llywodraeth y DU ar gyfer sefyllfa pe byddai Llywodraeth y DU o'r farn na allem ni fforddio gwario hwnnw ar ddiwedd y flwyddyn ariannol, yna byddai'n darparu'r cyllid ychwanegol. Roedd yn fath o warant, ac roedd yn ddefnyddiol iawn gan ei fod yn caniatáu i ni gael y sicrwydd hwnnw a'r hyder hwnnw i symud ymlaen a gwneud cynlluniau a buddsoddiadau yn syth ar ôl hynny. Fodd bynnag, bydd cyd-Aelodau yn ymwybodol y bu gan Lywodraeth Cymru gyllid sylweddol ar ddiwedd y flwyddyn ariannol o ganlyniad i gyhoeddiadau hwyr am symiau canlyniadol COVID gan Lywodraeth y DU a hefyd ein rheolaeth well o gyllid yma yng Nghymru o ran profi, olrhain, diogelu a chyfarpar diogelu personol, er enghraifft. Ac, o'r herwydd, cymerodd Llywodraeth y DU y £31 miliwn hwnnw o'r gronfa COVID, gan felly beidio â darparu'r cyllid ychwanegol hwnnw. Felly, rwy'n credu ei bod yn werth cael y ffeithiau am hynny. Yr hyn nad wyf eisiau ei wneud heddiw yn y trafodaethau hyn yr ydym ni wedi bod yn eu cael am domenni glo yw achosi braw, ac mae hynny'n rhywbeth sy'n bwysig iawn yn fy marn i, oherwydd rydym ni wedi bod yn cael dealltwriaeth dda iawn a gwell o'n tomenni glo ledled Cymru, ac erbyn hyn mae gennym ddarlun llawer, llawer gwell o'r nifer a'u statws presennol, ac mae'n amlwg ein bod wedi sefydlu trefn archwilio a chynnal a chadw gadarn drwy weithio gyda'r Awdurdod Glo - Awdurdod Glo'r DU - ac awdurdodau lleol. Mae'r rhaglen arolygu yn sicrhau bod y tomenni hynny'n cael eu harchwilio'n rheolaidd a bod unrhyw waith cynnal a chadw yn cael ei nodi a'i wneud o fewn amserlenni penodol i liniaru cymaint o risgiau â phosibl. A bydd y cylch nesaf o arolygiadau gaeaf ar y tomenni risg uwch yn dechrau'r wythnos nesaf a bydd yn cael ei gynnal ar y cyd gan yr Awdurdod Glo ac awdurdodau lleol. Felly, rwyf eisiau rhoi'r sicrwydd hwnnw i gymunedau a allai fod wedi'u hanesmwytho gan y sylw sydd ar domenni glo ar hyn o bryd. Yn ogystal â hyn, rydym hefyd yn treialu treialon technolegol newydd ar domenni dethol, gan dreialu, er enghraifft, offer synhwyro sy'n cael ei roi ar y tomenni i fonitro symudiad, yn ogystal â delweddau lloeren i fesur lefelau lleithder pridd o bell islaw'r ddaear. Ac os oes unrhyw un yn pryderu am domen yn eu hardal, gan gynnwys y systemau draenio, yna mae llinell gymorth rhadffôn y gallant ei ffonio, a chyfeiriad e-bost, ar wefan Llywodraeth Cymru. Ac yn dilyn y stormydd a'r tirlithriadau yn ôl yn Nhylorstown a Wattstown, gwnaethom roi llythyr o gysur i awdurdodau lleol fel y gallent fwrw ymlaen ac ymgymryd â'r gwaith diogelwch uniongyrchol hwnnw heb orfod poeni o ble y byddai'r arian yn dod, ac rwy'n credu bod awdurdodau lleol hefyd yn croesawu hynny. Felly, gadewch i ni adlewyrchu yn olaf fod y cymunedau hyn wedi gwneud aberth sylweddol o ran y diwydiant glo, yn enwedig drwy'r tomenni glo ond hefyd mewn cymaint o ffyrdd eraill o ran yr effeithiau ar iechyd y mae'r cymunedau hyn yn dal i'w teimlo, ac rwy'n credu ei bod yn bryd cydnabod bod hyn yn rhagflaenu datganoli ac mae'n bryd, mewn gwirionedd, dangos ein hymrwymiad ar y cyd, gyda Llywodraeth y DU, i'r cymunedau hyn. Cefais fy nghalonogi mewn gwirionedd gan sylwadau Darren Millar heddiw yn natganiad y Prif Weinidog ar gysylltiadau rhynglywodraethol. Dywedodd, 'Rwyf i a fy nghyd-Aelodau ar feinciau Ceidwadwyr Cymru yn cytuno'n llwyr fod angen dull cydweithredol ar y cyd i fynd i'r afael â'r pryderon o gofio eu bod yn etifeddiaeth o'r cyfnod cyn datganoli.' Felly, roedd Darren Millar yn cydnabod bod hwn yn fater cyn datganoli, ac roedd Darren Millar yn cydnabod bod gan Lywodraeth y DU ran i'w chwarae yn hyn hefyd. Rwy'n credu bod hwn yn gyfle yn awr i bob un ohonom ni, yn drawsbleidiol, anfon neges gref iawn at Lywodraeth y DU. Siawns nad yw hyn yn rhywbeth y byddai pobl Cymru, ac yn enwedig yn y cymunedau glofaol hynny, yn disgwyl i ni ei wneud ac yn haeddu i ni ei wneud ar sail drawsbleidiol. Diolch.