English: Diolch, Llywydd. Most of my questions have been answered by the Minister, and I'm very pleased to hear that the 965 extra capacity for ventilators is there and that the five-million-plus PPE items have been distributed. But I have to agree that there are still deep concerns over the number of PPE available, particularly for the front line in hospitals and also for those social care workers. I have many constituents who have expressed deep worries over carers coming into their homes, when they themselves are vulnerable or their partners are vulnerable, and maybe bringing the disease into their homes. So, I think there's an area we still have to get to grips with. Now, I know you were talking about the new guidance, I remember you on the weekend saying that you expected that to be on Monday. Yesterday, at your press conference, you said that you hoped that it would be available yesterday. Today, you said it was rapidly evolving. I think it's important that we have a timescale as to when that new guidance will be in place, so we know what PPE is going to be appropriate for who and in what situation, so that we can ensure that the PPE gets to the right people in the right place at the right time. There's huge concern, both in the professions themselves and from the constituents who are receiving the care, regarding the availability of PPE. Can I also ask - ? I support Paul Davies's question on cancer, because there are many constituents who are deeply worried about the delay. They've had appointments for surgery that have been cancelled because of the coronavirus situation. We all understand the demands upon the NHS, but when you're facing a situation where you have breast cancer and you have an appointment for surgery and then that is cancelled, there are clearly deep worries. So, we do need to look at health boards and how they are scheduling such surgery to ensure that people who have other life-threatening conditions are not going to be disadvantaged by not having the surgery as and when that surgery is required. So, can you look at that aspect and ensure that health boards are delivering those types of details to Welsh Government and to ourselves to know that? On the field hospitals, it's come out today that NHS Nightingale may require 16,000 staff to deliver that. Now, if you have 7,000 extra beds, do you have the capacity to actually staff that type of extra number of beds? Because we already understand that there may be some reduction in capacity because staff themselves may get the virus. Where are we with making sure that, if we create these field hospitals, there will be sufficient staff and resources to deliver the care in those field hospitals? And finally, you might be aware of a letter that was sent out by a GP practice, not in my constituency, but, actually, I've had constituents who've received that letter, asking them did they wish to be considered as 'do not resuscitate' if they got the virus. I will contact all health boards urgently to ensure that no such letter goes out again from another GP practice, because every patient's life is worth a huge amount. It is not something they should be asking: 'Do you want a do not resuscitate note put on your notes?' Can you imagine a patient getting that letter, saying, 'If you get the virus, stay at home. We'll look after you, but we won't put you down as needing resuscitation. We won't take you into hospital as an urgent patient'? It is not acceptable - I'm sure you agree with that. Will you ensure that all health boards tell their GP practices that that is not the way to move forward? Diolch.
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Mae'r mwyafrif o fy nghwestiynau wedi'u hateb gan y Gweinidog, ac rwy'n falch iawn o glywed am y capasiti ychwanegol o 965 ar gyfer peiriannau anadlu a bod y pum miliwn a mwy o eitemau cyfarpar diogelu personol wedi'u dosbarthu. Ond mae'n rhaid imi gytuno bod cryn bryder o hyd ynghylch faint o gyfarpar diogelu personol sydd ar gael, yn enwedig ar gyfer y rheng flaen mewn ysbytai a hefyd i'r gweithwyr gofal cymdeithasol hynny. Mae gennyf lawer o etholwyr sydd wedi mynegi cryn bryder ynghylch gofalwyr yn dod i'w cartrefi, pan fyddant hwy eu hunain yn agored i niwed neu pan fydd eu partneriaid yn agored i niwed, ac efallai'n dod â'r afiechyd i'w cartrefi. Felly, credaf fod hwnnw'n faes rydym eto i fynd i'r afael ag ef. Nawr, gwn i chi sôn am y canllawiau newydd, ac fe'ch cofiaf yn dweud ar y penwythnos eich bod yn disgwyl i hynny ddigwydd ddydd Llun. Ddoe, yn eich cynhadledd i'r wasg, fe ddywedoch chi eich bod yn gobeithio y byddent ar gael ddoe. Heddiw, fe ddywedoch ei fod yn esblygu'n gyflym. Credaf ei bod yn bwysig fod gennym amserlen o ran pryd y bydd y canllawiau newydd hynny ar waith, fel ein bod yn gwybod pa gyfarpar diogelu personol fydd yn briodol ar gyfer pwy ac ym mha sefyllfa, fel y gallwn sicrhau bod y cyfarpar diogelu personol yn cyrraedd y bobl iawn yn y lle iawn ar yr amser iawn. Mae yna gryn bryder, yn y proffesiynau eu hunain ac ymhlith yr etholwyr sy'n derbyn y gofal, ynghylch argaeledd cyfarpar diogelu personol. A gaf fi ofyn hefyd - ? Rwy'n cefnogi cwestiwn Paul Davies ar ganser, gan fod llawer o etholwyr yn poeni'n fawr am yr oedi. Mae eu hapwyntiadau ar gyfer llawdriniaethau wedi cael eu canslo oherwydd sefyllfa'r coronafeirws. Mae pob un ohonom yn deall y gofynion sy'n wynebu'r GIG, ond pan fyddwch yn wynebu sefyllfa lle mae gennych ganser y fron ac mae gennych apwyntiad i gael llawdriniaeth a'i bod yn cael ei chanslo wedyn, mae'n amlwg fod yna bryderon mawr. Felly, mae angen inni edrych ar fyrddau iechyd a sut y maent yn amserlennu llawdriniaethau o'r fath i sicrhau nad yw pobl â chyflyrau eraill sy'n peryglu eu bywydau yn mynd i fod dan anfantais drwy beidio â chael y llawdriniaethau pan fydd eu hangen. Felly, a wnewch chi edrych ar yr agwedd honno a sicrhau bod byrddau iechyd yn cyflwyno'r mathau hynny o fanylion i Lywodraeth Cymru ac i ninnau er mwyn gwybod hynny? O ran yr ysbytai maes, dywedwyd heddiw y gallai NHS Nightingale alw am 16,000 o staff i gyflawni hynny. Nawr, os oes gennych 7,000 o welyau ychwanegol, a oes gennych gapasiti i staffio'r math hwnnw o nifer ychwanegol o welyau? Oherwydd rydym eisoes yn deall y gallai fod rhywfaint o leihad mewn capasiti gan y gall y staff eu hunain gael y feirws. Beth yw ein sefyllfa o ran sicrhau, os ydym yn creu'r ysbytai maes hyn, y bydd digon o staff ac adnoddau i ddarparu'r gofal yn yr ysbytai maes hynny? Ac yn olaf, efallai eich bod yn ymwybodol o lythyr a anfonwyd gan feddyg teulu, nid yn fy etholaeth i, ond mae rhai o fy etholwyr wedi derbyn y llythyr hwnnw, yn gofyn iddynt a oeddent am gael eu hystyried yn gleifion 'peidiwch â dadebru' pe byddent yn cael y feirws. Byddaf yn cysylltu â phob bwrdd iechyd ar frys i sicrhau nad oes unrhyw lythyr o'r fath yn cael ei anfon eto gan bractis meddyg teulu arall, gan fod bywyd pob claf yn werthfawr iawn. Nid yw'n rhywbeth y dylent fod yn gofyn: 'A ydych am i nodyn 'peidiwch â dadebru' gael ei roi ar eich nodiadau?' A allwch ddychmygu claf yn cael y llythyr hwnnw, sy'n dweud, 'Os ydych yn cael y feirws, arhoswch gartref. Byddwn yn gofalu amdanoch, ond ni fyddwn yn eich nodi fel rhywun y mae angen eu dadebru. Ni fyddwn yn mynd â chi i'r ysbyty fel claf brys'? Nid yw'n dderbyniol - rwy'n siŵr eich bod yn cytuno â hynny. A wnewch chi sicrhau bod pob bwrdd iechyd yn dweud wrth eu meddygfeydd nad dyna'r ffordd ymlaen? Diolch.