techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: You're not answering the question, First Minister, I'm afraid. There were specific allegations about bullying, which you have denied, yet you've said that there were issues and you did deal with them. Now, you haven't explained to us what those issues were, how they were dealt with or whether or not there were, for example, reports produced. Will you now give us the clarity that this Assembly deserves, explain to us what issues were raised with you back in 2014 and what exactly you did to deal with those issues? If they weren't issues of bullying, that's fair enough. What were they then? Please clarify this now.
Welsh: Nid ydych chi'n ateb y cwestiwn, Prif Weinidog, mae arna i ofn. Roedd honiadau penodol am fwlio, yr ydych chi wedi eu gwadu, ac eto rydych chi wedi dweud bod materion yn bodoli a'ch bod wedi ymdrin â nhw. Nawr, nid ydych chi wedi esbonio i ni beth oedd y materion hynny, sut yr ymdriniwyd â nhw na pha un a oedd, er enghraifft, adroddiadau wedi eu llunio. A wnewch chi roi'r eglurder y mae'r Cynulliad hwn yn ei haeddu i ni nawr, gan esbonio i ni pa faterion a godwyd gyda chi yn ôl yn 2014 a beth union wnaethoch chi i ymdrin â'r materion hynny? Os nad oeddent yn faterion o fwlio, mae hynny'n ddigon teg. Beth oedden nhw felly? Eglurwch hyn nawr os gwelwch yn dda.
English: They were issues of competing priorities, of people feeling that some people were listened to more than others and people feeling that they want to see you as First Minister to explain their position. These are all normal processes of Cabinet and Government. It would be very odd if any Cabinet was in place where nobody ever disagreed. It would be very odd if a Cabinet was in place where people were in a position where they didn't feel that they wanted to make their views known in a particular way, and, as First Minister, that's the way that I always dealt with Government. If we look at what we did, as a Government, we delivered all our manifesto promises in the years up to 2016 and we are continuing to deliver them now. So, yes, there are always tensions in any Cabinet and surely any party leader will recognise that. What's hugely important is that those tensions don't get in the way of good governance, and they haven't got in the way of good governance, as the people of Wales have seen.
Welsh: Roedden nhw'n faterion o flaenoriaethau a oedd yn cystadlu, o bobl yn teimlo bod rhai pobl yn cael mwy o wrandawiad nag eraill a phobl yn teimlo eu bod nhw eisiau eich gweld chi fel y Prif Weinidog i esbonio eu sefyllfa. Mae'r rhain i gyd yn brosesau Cabinet a Llywodraeth arferol. Byddai'n rhyfedd iawn pe byddai unrhyw Gabinet ar waith lle nad oedd neb yn anghytuno byth. Byddai'n rhyfedd iawn pe byddai Cabinet ar waith lle'r oedd pobl mewn sefyllfa lle nad oeddent yn teimlo eu bod eisiau lleisio eu barn mewn ffordd benodol, ac, fel Prif Weinidog, dyna'r ffordd yr ymdriniais i â Llywodraethu bob amser. Os edrychwn ni ar yr hyn a wnaethom, fel Llywodraeth, cyflawnwyd ein holl addewidion maniffesto gennym yn y blynyddoedd hyd at 2016 ac rydym ni'n parhau i'w cyflawni nawr. Felly, oes, mae tensiynau mewn unrhyw Gabinet bob amser ac yn sicr bydd unrhyw arweinydd plaid yn cydnabod hynny. Yr hyn sy'n hynod bwysig yw nad yw'r tensiynau hynny yn rhwystro llywodraethu da, ac nid ydynt wedi rhwystro llywodraethu da, fel y mae pobl Cymru wedi ei weld.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. First Minister, I'm grateful for the way that you've engaged with the questions so far this afternoon - a stark contrast to the way you engaged last Wednesday with the question that I put to you in the topical questions. But there is this issue where there are two narratives running here. There is the narrative that you acknowledge - and, again, I was grateful for your acknowledging that in First Minister's questions last week - that you did have issues raised with you back in November 2014, and you dealt with those issues. And then there is the issue of the written question that Darren Millar put down and the difference in the answer that said that there hadn't been any issues at that time. Now, can you understand how people can get confused by those two answers? Were issues of bullying raised specifically with you in October/November 2014, and did you deal with them?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, rwy'n ddiolchgar am y ffordd yr ydych chi wedi ymgysylltu â'r cwestiynau hyd yn hyn y prynhawn yma - yn gwbl wahanol i'r ffordd y gwnaethoch chi ymgysylltu ddydd Mercher diwethaf gyda'r cwestiwn a ofynnais i chi yn y cwestiynau amserol. Ond ceir y mater hwn lle mae dau naratif yn cyd-redeg yn y fan yma. Ceir y naratif yr ydych chi'n ei gydnabod - ac, unwaith eto, roeddwn i'n ddiolchgar eich bod wedi cydnabod yn ystod cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog yr wythnos diwethaf - y codwyd materion gyda chi yn ôl ym mis Tachwedd 2014, a'ch bod chi wedi ymdrin â'r materion hynny. Ac yna ceir mater y cwestiwn ysgrifenedig a gyflwynwyd gan Darren Millar a'r gwahaniaeth yn yr ateb a ddywedodd na fu unrhyw broblemau ar yr adeg honno. Nawr, a allwch chi ddeall sut gall pobl gael eu drysu gan y ddau ateb hynny? A godwyd materion o fwlio yn benodol gyda chi ym mis Hydref/Tachwedd 2014, ac a wnaethoch chi ymdrin â nhw?
English: As I've already said - well, I'll just repeat what I said, just to make it clear again. I said I'm aware of the comments that have been made in the press. All I can say about those comments is that no specific allegation of bullying was ever presented to me in relation to those comments, either formally or informally. No evidence was given to me, nor was that word 'bullying' ever used in that way. I can't go beyond what I've said, once again, just to reiterate what I said earlier on.
Welsh: Fel yr wyf i wedi dweud eisoes - wel, mi wnaf i ailadrodd yr hyn a ddywedais, dim ond i'w wneud yn eglur eto. Dywedais fy mod i'n ymwybodol o'r sylwadau sydd wedi eu gwneud yn y wasg. Y cwbl y gallaf i ei ddweud am y sylwadau hynny yw na chyflwynwyd unrhyw gyhuddiad penodol o fwlio i mi erioed o ran y sylwadau hynny, yn ffurfiol nac yn anffurfiol. Ni roddwyd unrhyw dystiolaeth i mi, ac ni ddefnyddiwyd y gair 'bwlio' erioed yn y ffordd honno. Ni allaf fynd y tu hwnt i'r hyn yr wyf i wedi ei ddweud, unwaith eto, dim ond i ailadrodd yr hyn a ddywedais yn gynharach.
English: I'm still lacking an understanding of how difficult it is to answer this question. I've put it quite reasonably to you: were allegations of bullying put to you? Because that seems to be the assertion that has been put by two senior figures from your Government at the time - and others, I might add. It is not unreasonable for us to ask the questions of you as First Minister, because the accusations are levelled at your office and, indeed, your role as First Minister. And so, can you be crystal clear in confirming whether - and I don't particularly - ? I appreciate you've got the written notes in front of you, but I think most people would remember if specific allegations around bullying were levelled and put to them to be dealt with. So, I'm just trying to get crystal clear in my own mind: were allegations related to bullying put to you in the time frame that has been identified by your former senior special adviser, and your former Cabinet Minister, Leighton Andrews?
Welsh: Mae gen i ddiffyg dealltwriaeth o hyd o ba mor anodd yw hi i ateb y cwestiwn hwn. Rwyf wedi gofyn yn eithaf rhesymol i chi: a gyflwynwyd honiadau o fwlio i chi? Oherwydd mae'n ymddangos mai dyna'r haeriad a wnaed gan ddau ffigwr blaenllaw o'ch Llywodraeth ar y pryd - ac eraill, dylwn ychwanegu. Nid yw'n afresymol i ni ofyn y cwestiynau i chi fel Prif Weinidog, oherwydd mae'r cyhuddiadau yn cael eu cyfeirio at eich swyddfa chi ac, yn wir, eich swyddogaeth fel Prif Weinidog. Ac felly, a allwch chi fod yn gwbl eglur o ran cadarnhau a - ac nid wyf yn arbennig - ? Rwy'n sylweddoli bod gennych chi'r nodiadau ysgrifenedig o'ch blaen, ond rwy'n credu y byddai'r rhan fwyaf o bobl yn cofio pe byddai honiadau penodol o fwlio wedi eu gwneud a'u cyflwyno iddyn nhw ymdrin â nhw. Felly, y cwbl rwy'n ei wneud yw ceisio cael y mater yn gwbl eglur yn fy meddwl fy hun: a gyflwynwyd honiadau yn ymwneud â bwlio i chi yn ystod y cyfnod amser a nodwyd gan eich cyn uwch-gynghorydd arbennig, a chan eich cyn-Weinidog y Cabinet, Leighton Andrews?
English: Well, I think I've just answered the question. There were no specific accusations of bullying. They were not presented to me formally or informally by them. The word was not even used in that way. I don't think I can go beyond the answer that I've given.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n credu fy mod i newydd ateb y cwestiwn. Nid oedd unrhyw gyhuddiadau penodol o fwlio. Ni chawsant eu cyflwyno i mi yn ffurfiol nac yn anffurfiol ganddyn nhw. Ni ddefnyddiwyd y gair erioed yn y ffordd honno. Nid wyf yn credu y gallaf i fynd y tu hwnt i'r ateb yr wyf i wedi ei roi.
English: Okay. There's going to be a motion tomorrow - next week, sorry - put before the Assembly to have an investigation into this. People will have listened to the answers you have given. I think the two opportunities I gave you were pretty straightforward - 'Yes' or 'No' answers, as such. You chose not to give the 'Yes' or 'No' answer. Is it the case that you will be supporting the motion that will come before the Assembly next week to allow detailed scrutiny of this particular interest? There is huge public interest in this particular matter. There are conflicting stories and narratives running here. It is not unreasonable to want to get to the bottom of this, and if we can't get to the bottom of it in this particular institution, then what on earth is the point of this institution? So, can I ask you, First Minister: will you be supporting that motion that comes before the Assembly next Wednesday?
Welsh: Iawn. Bydd cynnig yn cael ei roi gerbron y Cynulliad yfory - yr wythnos nesaf, mae'n ddrwg gen i - i gael ymchwiliad i'r mater hwn. Bydd pobl wedi gwrando ar yr atebion yr ydych chi wedi eu rhoi. Rwy'n credu bod y ddau gyfle a roddais i chi yn eithaf syml - atebion 'Do' neu 'Naddo', fel y cyfryw. Fe wnaethoch ddewis peidio â rhoi'r ateb 'Do' neu 'Naddo'. A yw'n wir y byddwch chi'n cefnogi'r cynnig a fydd yn dod gerbron y Cynulliad yr wythnos nesaf i ganiatáu craffu manwl ar y mater penodol hwn? Mae diddordeb cyhoeddus enfawr yn y mater penodol hwn. Ceir straeon a naratifau sy'n gwrthdaro yma. Nid yw'n afresymol i fod eisiau mynd at wraidd y mater, ac os na allwn ni gael at ei wraidd yn y sefydliad penodol hwn, yna beth ar y ddaear yw diben y sefydliad hwn? Felly, a gaf i ofyn i chi, Prif Weinidog: a fyddwch chi'n cefnogi'r cynnig hwnnw a ddaw gerbron y Cynulliad ddydd Mercher nesaf?
English: There are a number of ways in which this issue can be dealt with. We reserve our position in terms of the vote next week until we've studied carefully, of course, the breadth of the terms of reference of that motion. But nevertheless, I do accept that this is an issue that will need further scrutiny. I'm not afraid of that scrutiny, and I think it's a question of finding out what is the most effective way of that scrutiny being exercised, and that is something I'm not afraid of.
Welsh: Ceir nifer o ffyrdd y gellir ymdrin â'r mater hwn. Rydym ni'n cadw ein safbwynt yn ôl o ran y bleidlais yr wythnos nesaf tan y byddwn ni wedi astudio'n ofalus, wrth gwrs, ehangder cylch gorchwyl y cynnig hwnnw. Ond serch hynny, rwy'n derbyn bod hwn yn fater y bydd angen craffu arno ymhellach. Nid wyf i'n ofni'r craffu hwnnw, a chredaf ei fod yn gwestiwn o ddarganfod beth yw'r ffordd fwyaf effeithiol o wneud y gwaith craffu hwnnw, ac nid yw hynny'n rhywbeth yr wyf i'n ei ofni.
English: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Llywydd. I hope that the First Minister will feel that he owes the Assembly a duty of candour on this issue, but clearly we're going to get no further on it today and we'll have to wait for the debate next week to see whether we can make progress, so I would like to turn to another issue. The First Minister said recently that he would like to see air passenger duty devolved to Wales so that he could abolish it for long-haul flights, and I welcome the First Minister to the ranks of tax cutters and tax abolishers in the Assembly. It makes a change from all the other taxes that he wants to introduce. But this is, of course, in a way a form of tax avoidance that he's in favour of, because it will give Welsh airports a small but significant advantage over airports on the other side of the border in England that will still have air passenger duty applying to them. So, can the First Minister explain to me how it is that he can reconcile his views on air passenger duty with his other views that the tax system should not be used for tax competition within the United Kingdom or, indeed, with other countries?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Llywydd. Rwy'n gobeithio y bydd y Prif Weinidog yn teimlo bod ganddo ddyletswydd o onestrwydd i'r Cynulliad o ran y mater hwn, ond mae'n amlwg nad ydym ni'n mynd i fynd dim pellach yn ei gylch heddiw ac y bydd yn rhaid aros am y ddadl yr wythnos nesaf i weld a allwn ni wneud cynnydd, felly hoffwn i droi at fater arall. Dywedodd y Prif Weinidog yn ddiweddar y byddai'n hoffi gweld tollau teithwyr awyr yn cael eu datganoli i Gymru fel y gallai eu diddymu ar gyfer teithiau awyr hir, a chroesawaf y Prif Weinidog i rengoedd y torwyr trethi a'r diddymwyr trethi yn y Cynulliad. Mae'n newid o'r holl drethi eraill y mae ef eisiau eu cyflwyno. Ond mae hwn, wrth gwrs, yn fodd o osgoi trethi y mae e'n gefnogol iddo mewn ffordd, gan y bydd yn rhoi mantais fach ond arwyddocaol i feysydd awyr Cymru dros feysydd awyr ar ochr arall y ffin yn Lloegr y bydd tollau teithwyr awyr yn dal i fod yn berthnasol iddyn nhw. Felly, a all y Prif Weinidog esbonio i mi sut y gall gysoni ei farn ar dollau teithwyr awyr â'i safbwyntiau eraill na ddylid defnyddio'r system dreth ar gyfer cystadleuaeth dreth o fewn y Deyrnas Unedig neu, yn wir, â gwledydd eraill?
English: Because there already is tax competition. Scotland already controls air passenger duty and there is an element of devolution of air passenger duty in Northern Ireland. It does not make sense to me, then, that Wales is denied the same advantages as those elsewhere in the UK. We've presented evidence to the UK Government that makes it clear that this is no threat to Bristol; we don't see it that way. This is about developing in particular long-haul flights from Cardiff, and we believe Cardiff is in a very good position to be able to do that and, by dint of that, developing other airports, regional airports around Wales, that are able to link in to Cardiff as a hub. The UK Government have dismissed, we understand, that evidence without ever offering any evidence of their own.
Welsh: Oherwydd bod cystadleuaeth o ran trethi eisoes. Mae'r Alban eisoes yn rheoli tollau teithwyr awyr, ac mae elfen o ddatganoli tollau teithwyr awyr yng Ngogledd Iwerddon. Nid yw'n gwneud synnwyr i mi, felly, y gwrthodir yr un manteision i Gymru â'r rheini mewn mannau eraill yn y DU. Rydym ni wedi cyflwyno tystiolaeth i Lywodraeth y DU sy'n ei gwneud yn eglur nad yw hyn yn unrhyw fygythiad i Fryste; nid ydym ni'n ei gweld hi felly. Mae hyn yn ymwneud â datblygu, yn benodol, teithiau awyr pell o Gaerdydd, ac rydym ni'n credu bod Caerdydd mewn sefyllfa dda iawn i allu gwneud hynny a, thrwy hynny, datblygu meysydd awyr eraill, meysydd awyr rhanbarthol ledled Cymru, sy'n gallu cysylltu â Chaerdydd fel canolfan. Mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi gwrthod y dystiolaeth honno, rydym ni'n deall, heb gynnig unrhyw dystiolaeth ei hunan ar unrhyw adeg.
English: I hope the First Minister doesn't misunderstand me. I'm strongly in favour of what he proposes and very much in favour of the devolution of taxes to Wales so that we can cut them or abolish them and then give us an advantage over other parts of the United Kingdom, which compensates for the historical disadvantages that we have to fight against. What I am interested in here are the inconsistencies in the Labour Party's positions generally. The purpose of air passenger duty, when it was introduced, was to cut greenhouse gas emissions, and therefore abolishing it doesn't really seem to fit in with the other enthusiasms of the Labour Party in relation to the protection of the environment. So, how does the abolition of air passenger duty on long haul flights - how can it be reconciled with the Labour Party's views on green energy and the need to cut carbon emissions?
Welsh: Rwy'n gobeithio nad yw'r Prif Weinidog yn fy nghamddeall. Rwyf yn sicr o blaid yr hyn y mae'n ei gynnig ac yn sicr o blaid datganoli trethi i Gymru fel y gallwn eu torri neu eu diddymu ac yna rhoi mantais i ni dros rannau eraill o'r Deyrnas Unedig, sy'n gwneud iawn am yr anfanteision hanesyddol y mae'n rhaid i ni ymladd yn eu herbyn. Yr hyn sydd o ddiddordeb i mi yn y fan yma yw'r anghysonderau o ran safbwynt y Blaid Lafur yn gyffredinol. Diben y tollau teithwyr awyr, pan gawsant eu cyflwyno, oedd lleihau allyriadau nwyon tŷ gwydr, ac felly nid yw eu diddymu wir yn ymddangos fel pe byddai'n cyd-fynd â diddordebau eraill y Blaid Lafur o ran diogelu'r amgylchedd. Felly, sut mae diddymu'r tollau teithwyr awyr ar deithiau awyr pell - sut gellir ei gysoni â safbwyntiau'r Blaid Lafur ar ynni gwyrdd a'r angen i leihau allyriadau carbon?
English: It's quite simple. There are many, many people, not just from south Wales but from the south-west of England, who are presently travelling to Heathrow to fly on long-haul flights. If they travel a shorter distance, their own carbon footprint is lower. So, it does make sense then to put people in a position where they're not driving so far, where they are not increasing their own carbon footprint by giving them the option of being able to fly closer to home.
Welsh: Mae'n eithaf syml. Ceir nifer fawr iawn o bobl, nid yn unig o dde Cymru ond o dde-orllewin Lloegr, sy'n teithio i Heathrow ar hyn o bryd i hedfan ar deithiau awyr pell. Pe byddent yn teithio pellter byrrach, byddai eu hôl-troed carbon eu hunain yn llai. Felly, mae'n gwneud synnwyr felly i roi pobl mewn sefyllfa lle nad ydyn nhw'n gyrru mor bell, lle nad ydyn nhw'n cynyddu eu hôl-troed carbon eu hunain trwy roi'r dewis iddynt o allu hedfan yn nes at gartref.
English: The First Minister knows that's pure sophistry. There is another aspect to this as well that's worth consideration, because he will have seen that Monsieur Barnier, in his latest pronunciamento about Britain's future trading relationships with Europe, said a couple of days ago: 'There will be no ambitious partnership without common ground in fair competition, state aid, tax dumping'. Well, of course, tax dumping is the way that French politicians in particular refer to tax competition between nations, and they're very much against it. The whole trend of the European Union is to harmonise taxes so that there is no possibility of doing what the Irish have done in relation to corporation tax, giving them a significant advantage, which has been of great benefit to their economy. So, does the First Minister not see that leaving the EU does give us the freedoms that we in Wales could use, if we use them imaginatively, to increase the output of the Welsh economy and the tax base and therefore provide the Welsh Government with more money to provide the other good public services that we want?
Welsh: Mae'r Prif Weinidog yn gwybod bod hynna'n dwyllresymu pur. Ceir agwedd arall ar hyn hefyd y mae'n werth ei ystyried, oherwydd bydd wedi gweld bod Monsieur Barnier, yn ei ddatganiad diweddaraf ar berthynas fasnachu Prydain gydag Ewrop yn y dyfodol, wedi dweud diwrnod neu ddau yn ôl: Ni fydd unrhyw bartneriaeth uchelgeisiol heb dir cyffredin o ran cystadleuaeth deg, cymorth gwladwriaethol, dadlwytho treth. Wel, wrth gwrs, dadlwytho treth yw'r ffordd y mae gwleidyddion Ffrainc yn arbennig yn cyfeirio at gystadleuaeth treth rhwng gwledydd, ac maen nhw'n ei wrthwynebu'n fawr. Tuedd gyfan yr Undeb Ewropeaidd yw cysoni trethi fel nad oes unrhyw bosibilrwydd o wneud yr hyn y mae'r Gwyddelod wedi ei wneud o ran treth gorfforaeth, gan roi mantais sylweddol iddynt, sydd wedi bod o fudd mawr i'w heconomi. Felly, onid yw'r Prif Weinidog yn gweld bod gadael yr UE yn rhoi'r rhyddid y gallem ni yng Nghymru ei ddefnyddio, pe byddem yn ei ddefnyddio gyda dychymyg, i gynyddu allbwn economi Cymru a'r sail drethi a rhoi mwy o arian i Lywodraeth Cymru felly i ddarparu'r gwasanaethau cyhoeddus da eraill yr ydym ni eu heisiau?
English: Well, that is a naive approach because, as he knows full well, if we are looking to export to markets and those markets feel that we have unfair tax competition they will impose tariffs against us. So, it's not as if the UK has a free hand in all of this. The UK is a medium-sized country, and it's not in a position of dictating terms of trade to others. I refer him to what Aston Martin said only last week - that a hard Brexit would cause them to stop manufacturing cars. Now, these are not my words; these are words of a company that will soon be a significant employer in Wales, and I suspect we'll see more of that, which is why we need to understand where the UK Government is and we need to see the UK Government's plan and that needs to be soon, because if we're not in a position, I believe, where businesses can see that there is a way forward by the new year, then we will start seeing, I fear, announcements that will be negative as far as the economy of Britain is concerned.
Welsh: Wel, mae honno'n agwedd naïf oherwydd, fel y mae e'n gwybod yn iawn, os ydym ni eisiau allforio i farchnadoedd a bod y marchnadoedd hynny'n teimlo bod gennym ni gystadleuaeth dreth annheg, byddant yn gorfodi tariffau yn ein herbyn. Felly nid yw fel pe byddai gan y DU law rydd yn hyn i gyd. Mae'r DU yn wlad o faint canolig, ac nid yw mewn sefyllfa i fynnu telerau masnach i wledydd eraill. Fe'i cyfeiriaf at yr hyn a ddywedodd Aston Martin dim ond yr wythnos diwethaf - y byddai Brexit caled yn achosi iddynt roi'r gorau i weithgynhyrchu ceir. Nawr, nid fy ngeiriau i yw'r rhain; dyma eiriau cwmni a fydd yn gyflogwr sylweddol yng Nghymru yn fuan, ac rwy'n tybio y byddwn ni'n gweld mwy o hynny, a dyna pam mae angen i ni ddarganfod ble mae Llywodraeth y DU yn sefyll, ac mae angen i ni weld cynllun Llywodraeth y DU ac mae angen i hynny fod yn fuan, oherwydd os nad ydym ni mewn sefyllfa, yn fy marn i, lle gall busnesau weld bod ffordd ymlaen erbyn y flwyddyn newydd, yna byddwn ni'n dechrau gweld, mae arna i ofn, cyhoeddiadau a fydd yn negyddol cyn belled ag y mae economi Prydain yn y cwestiwn.
English: House building in Wales is a key priority for this Government, reflected by our ambitious 20,000 affordable homes target. Statistics show an increasing trend in the number of new homes being completed, which we will continue to support with our successful programmes, including the social housing grant.
Welsh: Mae adeiladu tai yng Nghymru yn flaenoriaeth allweddol i'r Llywodraeth hon, sydd wedi ei hadlewyrchu yn ein targed uchelgeisiol o 20,000 o gartrefi fforddiadwy. Mae ystadegau yn dangos tuedd gynyddol i nifer y cartrefi newydd sy'n cael eu cwblhau, y byddwn yn parhau i'w gefnogi gyda'n rhaglenni llwyddiannus, gan gynnwys y grant tai cymdeithasol.