techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Okay. Sorry, your feed was breaking up a little, but I do hope that I've understood the question you've asked. You're right in what you say in terms of priority being given to business use in rural units where there is change of use, but I would note that the policies included within the LDP also allow those properties to be used for residential purposes if you could provide proof of local need. The policy is based on the national policy framework set out in 'Planning Policy Wales', as well as technical advice note 6, which is related. And the guidance provided in that technical advice note gives priority to economic use, including tourism, for rural units that are converted. So, one possible change that could be made is that consideration could be given to residential use, and that further guidance could be provided in terms of the community benefits that could accrue from changing the use of a unit for residential purposes.
Welsh: Iawn. Rydych chi'n wir - . Sori, mae'r sain yn torri fyny dipyn bach, ond dwi'n meddwl bod fi wedi dallt y cwestiwn rydych chi'n ei ofyn. Rydych chi'n wir yn beth rydych chi'n ddweud o ran mae yna flaenoriaeth yn gallu cael ei roi i ddefnydd busnes o unedau gwledig fuasai'n cael eu trosi, ond mi fuaswn i'n nodi bod y polisïau sydd wedi cael eu cynnwys o fewn y cynllun datblygu lleol hefyd yn caniatáu defnydd anheddol pe byddai modd profi bod yna angen lleol am dŷ fforddiadwy hefyd yn bodoli. Mae'r polisi yn seiliedig ar arweiniad polisi cynllunio cenedlaethol sydd wedi cael ei gynnwys yn 'Polisi Cynllunio Cymru', ynghyd â'r nodyn technegol cysylltiedig, sef nodyn cyngor technegol 6. Ac mae'r arweiniad sydd wedi ei gynnwys yn y nodyn cyngor technegol yn rhoi blaenoriaeth i ddefnydd economaidd, gan gynnwys defnydd twristiaeth, ar gyfer unedau gwledig sy'n cael eu trosi. Felly, un newid posib fyddai'n gallu cael ei wneud ydy bod yna ystyriaeth hefyd yn gallu cael ei roi i ddefnydd anheddol, a bod yna arweiniad pellach yn gallu cael ei roi o ran y fantais gymunedol fuasai'n gallu deillio o drosi defnydd neu drosi uned sydd wedi ei leoli mewn ardal wledig ar gyfer y defnydd anheddol hynny.
English: Thank you, Chair. Just to echo what Heledd just said, I think it overlaps with a possible solution to a question that's been asked. Gwynedd Council does have a local market housing policy and, at the moment, it's only operational in those areas where there is a high density of second homes and short-term holiday lets. So, I suppose that a way of re-looking at this nationally would be to have a local housing policy which would be a priority in national planning policy, and that there should be a change of emphasis in terms of what the priority should be in terms of reusing buildings in rural areas so that that contributes towards keeping people in their communities. But, of course, what we need to ensure is that these buildings, when they are converted, aren't sold for a very high price, and that's where local housing policies could come in, where you could limit the ownership of those to people who do live locally. So, that could be a possible solution in the long term for Government. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch, Cadeirydd. Jest i ategu'r hyn mae Heledd wedi dweud, dwi'n meddwl bod o'n gorgyffwrdd efo, efallai, ateb posib i gwestiwn sydd wedi cael ei ofyn. Mae gan Gyngor Gwynedd bolisi tai marchnad leol. Ar hyn o bryd, dydy o ond yn weithredol yn y lleoedd lle mae gennym ni ddwysedd uchel iawn o ail gartrefi a llety gwyliau byrdymor. Felly, mae'n debyg mai ffordd o ailedrych ar hyn yn genedlaethol fuasai i gael polisi tai marchnad leol yn rhywbeth sydd yn flaenoriaeth yn 'Polisi Cynllunio Cymru', a bod yna newid mewn pwyslais o ran beth ydy'r flaenoriaeth o ran ailddefnyddio adeiladau yng nghefn gwlad, fel bod hwnna yn cyfrannu tuag at gadw pobl yn eu cymunedau. Ond, wrth gwrs, beth rydyn ni angen sicrhau ydy bod yr adeiladau yma pan maen nhw'n cael eu trosi ddim wedyn yn cael eu gwerthu am grocbris, a dyna lle mae polisi tai marchnad leol yn dod i mewn, a fuasai'n gallu cyfyngu meddiant rheini wedyn i bobl sydd yn lleol. Felly, gall hwnnw fod yn ateb posib i'r hirdymor i'r Llywodraeth. Diolch.
English: I'm happy to begin.
Welsh: Dwi'n hapus - .
English: Thank you, Chair. The only thing I wanted to add - . I think the point raised and the question is a very interesting one, but it's also very pertinent, because the reference to local market housing policies is an example of what an authority can do locally in meeting local needs. The secret to that is that we've been able to evidence that this is an issue that needed to be addressed in Gwynedd. So, where you can evidence things that meet local needs, then I think that is possible, and perhaps there should be more flexibility to allow that to happen at the local authority level, although at the national level, of course, it is important that we have some element of consistency across Wales too. But certainly at the local level I do think that there is some flexibility for us to be able to evidence our policies so that those are developed to meet local needs. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch, Gadeirydd. Yr unig beth roeddwn i am ychwanegu oedd - . Dwi'n meddwl bod y pwynt sydd wedi cael ei godi a'r cwestiwn yn un diddorol ond yn un perthnasol iawn, achos mae'r cyfeiriad at y polisi tai marchnad leol yn enghraifft o beth mae awdurdod yn gallu ei wneud yn lleol, a chwrdd â beth ydy'r anghenion yn lleol. Y gyfrinach a'r sail i hynny, wrth gwrs, ydy ein bod ni wedi gallu tystiolaethu bod hyn yn fater yr oedd angen ei gyfarch yng Ngwynedd. Felly, lle rydych chi'n gallu tystiolaethu pethau sydd yn cwrdd ag anghenion lleol, dwi'n meddwl bod hynny yn bosib, ac efallai y dylai fod yna fwy o hyblygrwydd i hynny fod yn digwydd ar lefel awdurdodau lleol, er ar yr un pryd, wrth gwrs, ar lefel genedlaethol, mae'n bwysig bod gennym ni ryw elfen o gysondeb ar draws Cymru hefyd. Ond yn sicr ar lefel leol, dwi'n credu bod yna ryw gymaint o hyblygrwydd yna inni fod yn gallu tystiolaethu ein polisïau fel bod y rheini'n cael eu datblygu i gyfarch beth ydy anghenion ein cymunedau lleol ni. Diolch.
English: Would you like me to come in on that, Chair?
Welsh: Wyt ti eisiau i fi ddod i mewn ar hynna, Gadeirydd?
English: I would hope that we are getting the tone right in Gwynedd. We do seek to explain the scale of the problem. As I've said already, we welcome tourism, but I do think that people do tend to conflate the two issues of second homes and tourism. They are entirely separate for me. I think that on occasion both those concepts are confused. I am very opposed to second homes personally and politically. I think it's immoral that there are people who own more than one house when there are people who don't have any accommodation. I have no problem in saying that. But, of course, we do welcome the tourism industry at a sustainable level, where there are local businesses who let accommodation with proper planning permission and run a business and help to keep our communities viable and prosperous. So, if the tone is that we need to better explain the difference between the two, then perhaps that's where the work needs to be done.
Welsh: Dwi'n gobeithio ein bod ni'n cael y tôn yn gywir yng Ngwynedd. Rydyn ni yn trio esbonio faint o broblem ydy o. Fel dwi wedi dweud o'r blaen, rydyn ni'n croesawu twristiaeth, ond dwi'n meddwl bod pobl yn tueddu i ddrysu'r ddau fater. Mae ail gartrefi a thwristiaeth yn ddau fater gwbl ar wahân i mi. Dwi'n meddwl weithiau bod y ddau gysyniad yna'n cael eu drysu. Dwi'n wrthwynebus iawn i ail gartrefi yn bersonol ac yn wleidyddol. Dwi'n meddwl ei fod o'n anfoesol bod yna bobl sy'n berchen ar fwy nag un tŷ pan mae yna bobl sydd heb yr un tŷ. Does gen i ddim problem dweud hynny o gwbl. Ond, wrth gwrs, rydyn ni'n croesawu'r diwydiant twristiaeth ar lefel gynaliadwy, lle mae yna fusnesau lleol sydd yn gosod tai sydd wedi cael caniatâd cynllunio ac yn gwneud incwm ac yn gwneud busnes ac yn helpu i gadw ein cymunedau ni yn fyw ac yn iach ac yn fyrlymus. Felly, dwi'n meddwl os mai'r tôn ydy ein bod ni eisiau esbonio'n well ein bod ni'n gweld gwahaniaeth rhwng y ddau yna, efallai dyna lle mae'r gwaith i'w wneud.
English: I wouldn't say that. That's part of your work. I think that's a very different issue, and I think Cardiff is very different to Nefyn too.
Welsh: Buaswn i ddim yn dweud hynny. Mae hynny'n rhan o'ch gwaith chi, am wn i. Dwi'n meddwl bod hynny yn fater gwahanol iawn, a dwi'n meddwl bod Caerdydd yn wahanol iawn i Nefyn hefyd.
English: Thank you for that question. This is multilayered, of course. One is that it does raise funds and we can make good use of those funds in order to help to provide affordable homes. I hope that it will persuade some people not to purchase a second home. I think that that may be of assistance. In that regard, it is twofold. As the powers are there for us, then something we heard a great deal when we were trying to explain this problem to Government, and did so over many years, is that, 'Well, you're not currently using the powers you have; you're not charging that 100 per cent premium', because at the time we were charging a 50 per cent premium. So, I think we had to take that step in order to demonstrate that we were doing everything within our powers and using all of the tools in our box before we could return to Government and say, 'Well, we're doing everything we can and the problem persists'. I think for those three reasons - those were the reasons why it was the obvious step to take.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiwn. Mae yna sawl haen i hyn, onid oes? Un ydy ei fod o'n codi'r arian i ni, ac mi rydyn ni'n gallu gwneud defnydd da o'r arian yna i helpu i ddarparu tai fforddiadwy. Dwi'n gobeithio ei fod o'n mynd i fod yn help i berswadio rhai pobl i beidio â chael ail gartref. Dwi'n meddwl bod hynny, efallai, o bosibl, yn mynd i fod o help. Yn hynny o beth, mae o'n ddeublyg. Gan fod y pwerau yna i ni wneud hynny, rhywbeth yr oeddem ni'n ei gael lot pan oeddem ni'n ceisio esbonio'r broblem yma i'r Llywodraeth dros y blynyddoedd oedd, 'Wel, dydych chi ddim yn defnyddio'r pwerau sydd gennych chi; dydych chi ddim yn codi 100 y cant', achos ar y pryd roeddem ni'n codi 50 y cant. Felly, dwi'n meddwl ein bod ni'n gorfod mynd i'r fan honno er mwyn gallu dangos ein bod ni'n gwneud popeth o fewn ein gallu ac yn defnyddio'r holl dwls oedd gennym ni, cyn ein bod ni'n gallu mynd yn ôl at y Llywodraeth a dweud, 'Rydyn ni'n gwneud beth y medrwn ni, ac mae'r broblem dal yn parhau'. Dwi'n meddwl, am y tri rheswm yna - dyna oedd y rhesymau yr oedd o'n beth amlwg i'w wneud.
English: Perhaps I could respond to that. I think, of the 12 recommendations in Dr Brooks's paper, that was the one that we disagreed with, to a certain extent, from a Gwynedd Council perspective. The main reason for that was that, perhaps, they do have to pay business rates, but business rates go to a central pot and can't be used on a hyperlocal problem as we've identified it. In reality, they would pay less and there's no option to place a premium on that. So, that was the main reason for that. We would prefer to see a situation where any house would have to pay council tax, and that's why were looking for that change to section 66 of the Act.
Welsh: Gallaf i ateb hwnna. Dwi'n meddwl, o'r 12 argymhelliad ym mhapur Dr Brooks, hwnna oedd yr un yr oeddem ni, i raddau, yn anghytuno ag o, o ran Cyngor Gwynedd. Y prif reswm oedd, efallai, eu bod nhw yn gorfod talu'r dreth fusnes, ond, wrth gwrs, mae'r dreth fusnes yn mynd i'r pot canolog, felly ddim yn gallu cael ei defnyddio'n lleol iawn i ddelio efo'r broblem, fel rydyn ni yn ei gweld hi, a mwy na thebyg yn talu llai, hefyd, a dim opsiwn i roi premiwm ar ei phen hi. Felly dyna oedd y prif reswm am hynny. Mi fuasai'n well gennym ni weld sefyllfa lle bod unrhyw dŷ yn gorfod talu'r dreth gyngor, a dyna pam roeddem ni'n chwilio am yr addasiad yna i'r Ddeddf cyllid, adran 66.
English: The way we deal with second homes is similar to how we deal with empty homes, and there's a 100 per cent premium. There are other mechanisms that we use if somebody makes a case, let's say first-time buyers who have an empty property and want time to work on it; there are mechanisms in place for that. But, generally speaking, it would have been very difficult to differentiate between an empty home and a second home. An unfurnished, empty property; well, how can you differentiate between an empty property or a holiday home? The owner of a second home might argue that it's a vacant property because you can't see any furniture from the front windows perhaps, so we just saw it as being easier to have the same system in place for both kinds of accommodation.
Welsh: Mae sut rydyn ni'n trin ail gartrefi, rydyn ni'n trin tai gwag yn yr un modd, felly, sef 100 y cant premium. Mae yna fecanweithiau eraill rydyn ni'n eu defnyddio os ydy rhywun yn gwneud achos, fel teulu sy'n brynwyr tro cyntaf, efo tŷ gwag, ac eisiau amser i weithio ar y tŷ; mae yna fecanweithiau. Ond, yn gyffredinol, mi fuasai wedi bod yn anodd iawn i wahaniaethu rhwng beth ydy tŷ gwag a beth ydy ail gartref. Felly, tŷ gwag heb ddodrefn; wel, sut ydych chi'n gallu gwahaniaethu os ydy'r tŷ yn ail gartref neu'n dŷ gwag? Felly, buasai rhywun yn gweld senario lle bod perchennog ail gartref yn dadlau, 'Na, nid ail gartref ydy o, ond tŷ gwag ydy o achos does yna ddim dodrefn i weld o'r ffenest ffrynt' er enghraifft, ac roedden ni jest yn gweld ei bod hi'n haws i gael yr un drefn i'r ddau fath o dŷ.
English: Thank you very much. I've been enjoying the conversation this morning, and I'm very grateful to Heledd for her presentation too. And I agree with the analysis that you've presented to us in this document. I think it's important and very influential. You've mentioned how you try and implement various policies and the different options available to you. Do you think that there's enough leadership shown by Welsh Government?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr. Dwi wedi bod yn mwynhau'r sgwrs y bore yma, a dwi'n ddiolchgar i Heledd am y cyflwyniad hefyd. A dwi'n cytuno gyda'r dadansoddiad dŷch chi wedi cyflwyno i ni yn y ddogfen yma. Dwi'n credu ei fod e'n un pwysig, ac yn ddylanwadol iawn, y ffordd dwi wedi darllen drwyddo fe. Mi rydych chi wedi sôn amboutu sut rydych chi'n trio gweithredu polisïau gwahanol ac opsiynau gwahanol. Ydych chi'n meddwl bod yna ddigon o arweinyddiaeth gan Lywodraeth Cymru?
English: I think we've more or less reached the shore now, but it's been a very lengthy process, if truth be told. And there are people who are generations older than I am who've been talking about the second homes problem, particularly in those areas of west Wales. When I was a schoolboy, there was a pop group called Edward H. Dafis that sang about the problems of holiday homes -
Welsh: Dwi'n meddwl rydyn ni, fwy neu lai, wedi cyrraedd y lan bellach, ond mae wedi bod yn broses hir iawn, iawn i fod yn onest. Ac, hynny ydy, mae yna bobl genedlaethau yn hŷn na fi sydd yn sôn am broblem ail gartrefi, i fod yn berffaith onest, yn enwedig yn ardaloedd y gorllewin. Hynny ydy, pan oeddwn i'n hogyn ysgol, roedd yna grŵp pop o'r enw Edward H. Dafis oedd yn canu am broblem tai haf -
English: I remember.
Welsh: Dwi'n cofio.
English: I'm almost as old as you, Dafydd. Don't worry, I remember and I understand these issues.
Welsh: Dafydd, dwi bron yr un mor hen ag wyt ti, so dwi'n deall y pethau yma'n iawn.
English: So, the problem is nothing new, that's the point I'm making. It's been a very real problem, and during the 1980s, there was no way in the world that we were going to get any help from the Thatcher Government. And there was some light at the end of the tunnel with the advent of devolution, where we would have our own Government that would perhaps assist us. And there were reports, I believe, in 2001, which demonstrated that there was a problem, and that there were possible solutions. Unfortunately, those have remained on the shelf for 20 years, but there we are, we are where we are now. So, yes, it's been a lengthy process, and I think it was a sense of frustration that actually led to the commissioning of this work by Heledd and Gareth's team some two years ago. And, if I could be bold, and suggest that that should have been the work of Government. But anecdotal evidence simply wasn't good enough, and therefore, we needed more hard evidence, so we decided that we would have to do that work ourselves. And, although we had hoped to collaborate across many councils, it was only Cardiff Council, if memory serves me correctly, Gareth and Heledd, that showed any interest in the work. So, the work was done almost entirely by ourselves. I'm also pleased that the Government commissioned work from Dr Brooks more recently, which has confirmed the recommendations that we made, and to be fair, Dr Brooks's report quotes a great deal from Gwynedd Council's work, so I think taken together, both reports provide very robust evidence for Government.
Welsh: Felly, dydy'r broblem ddim yn un newydd, dyna ydy'r pwynt dwi'n ei wneud. Mae'r broblem wedi bod yn broblem real, ac yn amlwg, yn ystod yr wythdegau, doedd yna ddim ffordd yn y byd roedden ni'n mynd i gael unrhyw help gan Lywodraeth Thatcher. Ac, wrth gwrs, mi ddaeth yna ryw fath o oleuni pan ddaeth datganoli - efallai bydd gennym ni ein Llywodraeth ein hunain sy'n mynd i helpu pethau. Ac mi roedd yna adroddiadau, yn 2001, dwi'n meddwl, yn dangos bod yna broblem a bod yna atebion. Yn anffodus, ar y silff mae'r rheini wedi bod am 20 mlynedd, ond dyna fo, rydyn ni yma rŵan. Wedyn, ydy, mae wedi bod yn broses hir, a dwi'n meddwl mai rhyw fath o rwystredigaeth wnaeth gyflyru ni i gomisiynu'r gwaith yma gan griw Heledd a Gareth ryw ddwy flynedd yn ôl bellach. Ac, os caf fod yn hy ac awgrymu mai gwaith y Llywodraeth ddylai hynny fod wedi bod. Ond roedd tystiolaeth anecdotaidd ddim digon da, ac felly, roedd angen mwy o dystiolaeth, felly gwnaethon ni benderfynu, 'Wel, mae'n rhaid i ni wneud y gwaith ein hunain, felly.' Ac, er gwaethaf ein bod ni wedi gobeithio cydweithio ar draws lot o gynghorau, dim ond Cyngor Caerdydd, os dwi'n cofio'n iawn, Gareth a Heledd, oedd wedi dangos diddordeb yn y gwaith. Felly, fe wnaethpwyd y gwaith fwy neu lai yn gyfan gwbl gennym ni. Dwi'n falch hefyd bod y Llywodraeth wedi comisiynu gwaith gan Dr Brooks yn ddiweddarach, sydd wedi cadarnhau'r argymhellion yr oeddem ni'n eu gwneud. I fod yn deg, mae adroddiad Dr Brooks yn dyfynnu'n helaeth o waith Cyngor Gwynedd, felly dwi'n meddwl bod y ddau waith efo'i gilydd yn dystiolaeth gref iawn ar gyfer y Llywodraeth.
English: I would agree with that analysis. So, what are your hopes now? We had that statement from the Minister last week. I assume that you agree with that, from what you've said this morning. So, what are your hopes now in terms of changing policy or implementing different policy during the coming 12 months?
Welsh: Ocê. Dwi'n cytuno gyda'r dadansoddiad, gyda llaw. So, beth ydy'ch gobeithion chi nawr? Mi gawsom ni ddatganiad gan y Gweinidog wythnos ddiwethaf. Dwi'n cymryd eich bod chi'n cytuno gyda hynny, o beth rydych chi wedi dweud. So, beth ydy'ch gobeithion chi nawr ar gyfer symud polisi a newid polisi, neu weithredu polisi, dweud, yn ystod y flwyddyn sy'n dod?
English: Well, I welcome the statements, clearly. I welcome the pilot schemes, I welcome the consultations, but again, I'm frustrated that we have to go through this statutory process. But I understand exactly why that's the case. The 'Hawl i Fyw Adra' group in Nefyn see their community declining day on day, and thinking of it taking another 12 months before we can take action is frustrating, but that is the system, and I understand that. So, I hope that, as soon as possible, we will be able to put policies in place in Gwynedd. We're about to review our local development plan jointly between Gwynedd and Anglesey, and I very much hope that there will be an opportunity to incorporate new policies, and perhaps as we - . Heledd mentioned earlier the policy relating to HMOs. Now, that change came in around 2016, which provided that new use class, the C4 use class. In our most recent LDP, the one I was involved with, there are particular policies there on individual wards in the Bangor area, which place a cap on the number of HMOs based on local need and the ward profile, because of the student population in Bangor obviously. That's been very successful; that's been tested through the appeal system. I can foresee a system where we could put a cap on second homes and differentiate between primary residences, second homes and holiday accommodation, and place a reasonable cap in different areas in order to try and manage the situation at last.
Welsh: Dwi'n croesawu'r datganiadau, yn amlwg. Dwi'n croesawu'r cynlluniau peilot, dwi'n croesawu'r cyfnodau ymgynghori, ond mae'n rhwystredig eto ein bod ni'n gorfod mynd trwy broses mor statudol, ond dwi'n deall pam yn union. Mae'r criw 'Hawl i Fyw Adra' yn Nefyn yn gweld eu cymuned nhw'n dirywio diwrnod ar ôl diwrnod ar ôl diwrnod, ac mae meddwl y bydd blwyddyn arall tan i ni allu gweithredu yn rhwystredig. Ond dyna'r drefn; dwi'n deall mai dyna'r drefn. Dwi'n gobeithio, mor fuan ag sy'n bosib, y byddwn ni'n gallu rhoi polisïau ar waith yng Ngwynedd. Felly, rydyn ni ar fin adolygu ein cynllun datblygu lleol, ar y cyd rhwng Gwynedd a Môn. Dwi'n gobeithio'n fawr y bydd yna gyfle i ymgorffori polisïau newydd, ac efallai, fel rydyn ni wedi gwneud efo - . Roedd Heledd yn sôn gynnau am y polisi a oedd yn ymwneud â thai amlfeddiannaeth, yr HMOs, felly - mi ddaeth y newid yna mewn tua 2016, dwi'n meddwl, a oedd yn rhoi dosbarth defnydd newydd i ni, C4. Yn ein cynllun datblygu lleol diwethaf - y bues i'n ymwneud â fo, felly - mae yna bolisïau penodol yn fanna ynglŷn â wardiau unigol yn ardal Bangor, sy'n gosod cap ar nifer yr HMOs yn seiliedig ar yr angen, a phroffil y ward, oherwydd y myfyrwyr ym Mangor, yn amlwg. Felly, mae hwnna wedi bod yn llwyddiannus; mae hwnna wedi cael ei brofi trwy system apêl. Dwi'n rhagweld system lle rydyn ni'n mynd i allu rhoi cap ar ail gartrefi a gwahaniaethu rhwng prif gartref, ail gartref a llety gwyliau, a gosod cap rhesymol yn ein gwahanol ardaloedd ni, er mwyn trio rheoli'r sefyllfa o'r diwedd.
English: Thank you. I know time's against us, so can I just ask one brief, final question, if I may, and this is perhaps to your planning colleagues on the panel? When you consider policy, and when you consider how to change policy in response to the challenges that you face, do you consider the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 at all? Is that legislation having any influence on you in terms of how you make decisions?
Welsh: Ocê, diolch. Cadeirydd, mae'r amser yn mynd yn brin, so gwnaf i jest ofyn un cwestiwn byr olaf, os caf i, efallai i'r cynllunwyr fan hyn ar y panel. Pan ydych chi'n ystyried polisi a phan ydych chi'n ystyried sut i newid polisi i ymateb i'r her rydych chi'n wynebu, ydych chi'n ystyried Deddf Llesiant Cenedlaethau'r Dyfodol (Cymru) 2015 o gwbl? Ydy'r ddeddfwriaeth yna'n cael unrhyw ddylanwad arnoch chi, neu sut rydych chi'n gwneud penderfyniadau?
English: I would say 'yes', it has to be a consideration as we draw up our policies. We have to prove -
Welsh: Gwnaf i ymateb a dweud 'ydy', wrth gwrs mae'n gorfod bod yn ystyriaeth wrth i ni lunio ein polisïau ni. Mae'n rhaid i ni brofi -
English: But how does it change your decisions?
Welsh: Ond sut mae'n newid eich penderfyniadau?
English: Well, clearly we have to consider how we work for the benefit of our communities, and that is something that we have to evidence as we prepare our development plan.
Welsh: Wel, yn amlwg, mae'n rhaid i ni ystyried sut mae'r hyn rydyn ni'n ei weithredu er lles ein cymunedau, onid oes? Ac mae hyn yn rhywbeth y mae'n rhaid i ni brofi a thystiolaethu wrth fynd ati i baratoi ein cynllun datblygu.