English: Could I raise two issues with the leader of the house? First of all, could I ask for a statement from the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Services regarding the interoperability of the performers list in Wales and England? This is, as I understand it, the list that allows GPs to come from England to practice in Wales and, I suppose, vice versa. It's been raised with me several times by GPs in my region. I have got a particular issue at the moment in the Dyfi valley, where, for example, a practice has tried to get three locums recently. One locum took six months to get onto the performers list in Wales. Another one took two months to get onto the performers list in Wales, even though he was actually working in Bristol checking blood tests, but because the blood tests were from Wales, he had to be on the performers list in Wales. Two months' delay to do that is, I think, inordinate, when you think about it. I don't understand the full background as to why we can't have a completely interoperable list here. Of course I support the devolution of health services in Wales, but I want us to share commonality with England in that regard. It is what's stopping many GP practices successfully using locums in the most appropriate and effective way. They are engaging with them, paying some initial costs for them, and then they are not actually working for them for several months. This is what's holding back many GP practices, actually, not their willingness or otherwise to answer the phones in the morning. That's just a way of rationing services, and let's be honest about it; we may as well face that fact. So, can we have a statement or a letter to AMs about how this works, why there are problems, and why I'm receiving GPs contacting me with months' delays in simply getting fully qualified GPs, who are on the list in England and can work as GPs in England? To my mind, they should simply cross the border with a tick-box and we should have a way of doing that. The second issue I'd like to raise with you isn't for a statement, but it is very much around the business of the Assembly for the next couple of days. We've had a little bit of a ding-dong around whether the First Minister does involve himself in Westminster politics or not. I think we concluded that he does, and I think that we all have an interest in what's happening in Westminster today. We have the debates and the amendments on the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill from the House of Lords, and we have one and a half hours to discuss the whole bunch of amendments around devolution, around the operation of both Wales and Scotland, which I think is a disgrace - that so little time has been allowed for that debate. But, within that set of devolution amendments, we have amendments that potentially affect our legislative competence here. We have an amendment from your party - from Jeremy Corbyn himself, with Keir Starmer as the seconder - that changes the five-year rule that we have at the moment, around regulations carrying on for five years post the operation of the EU withdrawal Bill, to three years. That itself is different to your inter-governmental agreement. The inter-governmental agreement allows for five plus two. Your own Labour leader is saying it should be three plus two. So, straight away, something that we voted on - Plaid Cymru certainly didn't support it, but we voted on it as an Assembly several weeks ago - could be changed today in the House of Commons with a different set of amendments. This does underline, I think, just how chaotic Westminster is in dealing with devolution and, I have to say, to be frank, it underlines a lack of coherence in your own party in the way that you are addressing this. I won't rehearse the old arguments we've put forward that you did this inter-governmental agreement too early and you did it in haste and maybe you are now repenting at leisure, but can you tell the Assembly how you will deal with these issues as you receive reports from the House of Commons? As we see any impact on the devolution settlement, how do you intend to give us that information, and how do you intend that the Assembly, over the next few days, should respond to some of those amendments that might now change the EU withdrawal Bill?
Welsh: A gaf i godi dau fater ag arweinydd y tŷ? Yn gyntaf oll, a gaf i ofyn am ddatganiad gan Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Iechyd a Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol ynglŷn â gallu i ryngweithredu y rhestrau perfformwyr yng Nghymru a Lloegr? Rwyf ar ddeall bod hon yn rhestr sy'n caniatáu i feddygon teulu ddod o Loegr i ymarfer yng Nghymru, a, dybiwn i, i'r gwrthwyneb. Mae'r mater hwn wedi'i godi â mi sawl gwaith gan feddygon teulu yn fy rhanbarth i. Mae gennyf i broblem benodol ar hyn o bryd yn Nyffryn Dyfi, lle, er enghraifft, mae practis wedi ceisio cael tri aelod o staff locwm yn ddiweddar. Cymerodd chwe mis i un locwm gael lle ar y rhestr perfformwyr yng Nghymru. Cymerodd ddau fis i un arall gael lle ar y rhestr perfformwyr yng Nghymru, er ei fod mewn gwirionedd yn gweithio ym Mryste yn gwirio profion gwaed, ond oherwydd bod y profion gwaed yn dod o Gymru, bu'n rhaid iddo fod ar y rhestr perfformwyr yng Nghymru. Mae oedi o ddau fis i wneud hynny yn ormodol, rwy'n credu, pan fyddwch chi'n meddwl am y peth. Dydw i ddim yn deall y cefndir llawn ynghylch pam na allwn ni gael rhestr gwbl ryngweithredol yma. Wrth gwrs, rwy'n cefnogi datganoli gwasanaethau iechyd yng Nghymru, ond rwyf eisiau inni rannu cyffredinedd â Lloegr yn hyn o beth. Mae'n rhywbeth sy'n rhwystro llawer o bractisau meddygon teulu rhag defnyddio staff locwm yn llwyddiannus yn y ffordd fwyaf priodol ac effeithiol. Maen nhw'n ymgysylltu â hwy, yn talu rhai costau cychwynnol ar eu cyfer, ac yna dydyn nhw ddim mewn gwirionedd yn gweithio iddyn nhw am sawl mis. Dyma beth sy'n dal llawer o bractisau meddygon teulu yn ôl, mewn gwirionedd, nid eu parodrwydd neu fel arall i ateb y ffôn yn y bore. Mae hon yn ffordd o ddogni gwasanaethau, gadewch inni fod yn onest am hyn; cystal inni wynebu'r ffaith honno. Felly, a gawn ni ddatganiad neu lythyr i Aelodau'r Cynulliad am sut y mae hyn yn gweithio, pam y ceir problemau, a pham yr wyf i'n cael meddygon teulu yn cysylltu â mi i ddweud am oedi am fisoedd i gael meddygon teulu cymwys, sydd ar y rhestr yn Lloegr ac sy'n gallu gweithio fel meddygon teulu yn Lloegr? Yn fy marn i, dylen nhw allu croesi'r ffin drwy roi tic syml mewn blwch a dylai fod gennym ni ffordd o wneud hynny. Nid wyf yn gofyn i chi am ddatganiad ar yr ail fater yr hoffwn i ei godi, ond mae'n gysylltiedig iawn â busnes y Cynulliad ar gyfer y diwrnod neu ddau nesaf. Rydym ni wedi cael ychydig o ffrae ynghylch p'un a yw'r Prif Weinidog yn ymgymryd â gwleidyddiaeth San Steffan ai peidio. Rwy'n credu ein bod ni wedi dod i'r casgliad ei fod ef, a chredaf fod gennym ni i gyd ddiddordeb yn yr hyn sy'n digwydd yn San Steffan heddiw. Mae gennym ni'r dadleuon a'r gwelliannau ar Fil yr Undeb Ewropeaidd (Ymadael) o Dŷ'r Arglwyddi, ac mae gennym ni awr a hanner i drafod y casgliad cyfan o welliannau yn ymwneud â datganoli, yn ymwneud â gweithredu yng Nghymru a'r Alban, ac rwy'n credu bod hynny'n warthus - bod y ddadl honno wedi cael cyn lleied o amser. Ond, o fewn y set honno o welliannau datganoli, mae gwelliannau a allai fod yn effeithio ar ein cymhwysedd deddfwriaethol ni yn y fan yma. Mae gennym ni welliant gan eich plaid chi - gan Jeremy Corbyn ei hun, wedi'i eilio gan Keir Starmer - sy'n newid y rheol pum mlynedd sydd gennym ni ar hyn o bryd, o ran bod rheoliadau yn parhau am bum mlynedd ar ôl gweithrediad y Bil Ymadael yr UE, i dair blynedd. Mae hynny yn ei hun yn wahanol i'ch cytundeb rhynglywodraethol. Mae'r cytundeb rhynglywodraethol yn caniatáu ar gyfer pump a dwy yn ychwanegol. Mae arweinydd y Blaid Llafur ei hun yn dweud y dylai hyn fod yn dri a dwy yn ychwanegol. Felly, yn syth, rhywbeth y gwnaethom ni bleidleisio arno - na chafodd gefnogaeth gan Blaid Cymru yn sicr, ond fe wnaethom ni bleidleisio ar hyn fel Cynulliad rai wythnosau'n ôl - mae hyn yn gallu cael ei newid heddiw yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin drwy set wahanol o welliannau. Rwy'n credu bod hyn yn tanlinellu, pa mor anhrefnus yw San Steffan wrth ymdrin â datganoli ac, mae'n rhaid imi ddweud y gwir yn blaen, mae'n tanlinellu diffyg cydlyniaeth o fewn eich plaid eich hun yn y ffordd yr ydych hi'n ymdrin â hyn. Ni wnaf i ailadrodd yr hen ddadleuon yr ydym ni wedi eu cyflwyno, eich bod chi wedi cyflwyno'r cytundeb rhynglywodraethol hwn yn rhy gynnar ac y gwnaethoch chi hynny ar frys ac efallai erbyn hyn eich bod chi'n difaru'ch enaid, ond a allwch chi ddweud wrth y Cynulliad sut y byddwch chi'n ymdrin â'r materion hyn wrth i chi dderbyn adroddiadau gan Dŷ'r Cyffredin? Wrth i ni weld unrhyw effaith ar y setliad datganoli, sut yr ydych chi'n bwriadu rhoi'r wybodaeth honno inni, a beth yw eich bwriad o ran sut y dylai'r Cynulliad, dros yr ychydig ddyddiau nesaf, ymateb i rai o'r gwelliannau hynny a allai yn awr newid Bil Ymadael yr UE?