English: Thank you very much to everybody who's taken part in both debates this afternoon: the debate that we heard the Minister talking about there, about overall funding, and the debate that we actually presented to the Assembly earlier, about direct funding through the Family Fund to some of the most vulnerable families in Wales. I think said in my opening remarks that I think there's a good overall policy here, but that there's small print that is letting down some of our most vulnerable families. And that small print is the omission now or the decimation of that direct funding stream, and that is what we're talking about; £500 is a substantial amount as a one-off payment for a low-income family. It's the safe garden that we heard about. It's the respite. It is the tablet. It is the freezer. It is the washing machine because a child's disability means that they need to have their clothes and bed linen washed more frequently than most. It's a small sum for Government, though. We're talking here about £5.5 million over three years. If I can comment on what Nathan Gill said, I can name a lot of things that I'd rather Government didn't spend money on. We're talking here about what we want Welsh Government to spend money on. We can talk, if you like, about the £360 million that's going to be spent on Buckingham Palace or the doubling of the funding of the royal family that's just been passed, but that's not what we're talking about here. We're talking specifically about what Welsh Government can do, and I think it says everything about your politics that you want to use this debate about vulnerable families in Wales to attack spend on UK foreign aid, much of which is spent on vulnerable families abroad - and I'm more than happy to continue to support them. We're talking about a modest sum of money - [Interruption.] Yes, of course.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn i bawb sydd wedi cymryd rhan yn y ddwy ddadl y prynhawn yma: y ddadl y clywsom y Gweinidog yn siarad amdani yno, am arian cyffredinol, a'r ddadl a gyflwynwyd gennym i'r Cynulliad yn gynharach mewn gwirionedd, am gyllid uniongyrchol drwy Gronfa'r Teulu i rai o'r teuluoedd mwyaf agored i niwed yng Nghymru. Rwy'n meddwl fy mod wedi dweud yn fy sylwadau agoriadol fy mod o'r farn fod yna bolisi cyffredinol da yma, ond bod y print mân yn gwneud cam â'n teuluoedd mwyaf agored i niwed. A'r print mân hwnnw yn awr yw hepgor, neu gyfyngu'n helaeth ar y ffrwd cyllid uniongyrchol, ac am hynny yr ydym yn sôn; mae £500 yn swm sylweddol fel taliad untro i deulu incwm isel. Dyna'r ardd ddiogel y clywsom amdani. Dyna'r seibiant. Dyna'r llechen. Dyna'r rhewgell. Dyna'r peiriant golchi dillad oherwydd bod anabledd y plentyn yn golygu bod angen iddynt gael eu dillad a'u dillad gwely wedi'u golchi'n amlach na'r rhan fwyaf. Swm bach ydyw i Lywodraeth, er hynny. Rydym yn sôn yma am £5.5 miliwn dros dair blynedd. Os caf sôn am yr hyn a ddywedodd Nathan Gill, gallaf enwi llawer o bethau y byddai'n well gennyf pe na bai'r Llywodraeth yn gwario arian arnynt. Rydym yn sôn yma am yr hyn yr ydym am i Lywodraeth Cymru wario arian arno. Gallwn siarad, os mynnwch, am y £360 miliwn sy'n mynd i gael ei wario ar Balas Buckingham neu ddyblu cyllid y teulu brenhinol sydd newydd gael ei basio, ond nid am hynny yr ydym yn sôn yma. Rydym yn sôn yn benodol am yr hyn y gall Llywodraeth Cymru ei wneud, ac rwy'n meddwl ei fod yn dweud popeth am eich gwleidyddiaeth eich bod am ddefnyddio'r ddadl hon am deuluoedd agored i niwed yng Nghymru i ymosod ar wario ar gymorth tramor y DU, gyda llawer ohono'n cael ei wario ar deuluoedd sy'n agored i niwed dramor - ac rwy'n fwy na hapus i barhau i'w cefnogi. Rydym yn sôn am swm bychan o arian - [Torri ar draws.] Iawn, wrth gwrs.