English: First of all, can I say that Plaid Cymru supports the committee's recommendations in full? We're very pleased that we were able to agree a cross-party report that set out so clearly the issues and concerns in leaving the European Union and what needed to be addressed by this Government, but also by the Westminster Government. Because I agree with the report, I don't want to talk much about the report itself, but concentrate in two areas, I think. One is the area in which Plaid Cymru would have gone further than the report - so, to set out how we would respond to some of the challenges that are in here - and secondly, what's happened since we published the report. Because it's worth bearing in mind: we're having this debate today, but the report was published at the end of March. What has actually happened? We've had several weeks, almost three months, since then - more than three months, actually; four months - where we would've hopefully seen some progress on some of these recommendations. Well, let's examine a little of that. First of all, to say how we would respond to this report. From our point of view, we believe that membership of the single market and the customs union remains the most viable and sustainable way to maintain our agriculture sector here in Wales. We have that market that has been so successful for us to date. Farmers want to remain trading with that market. Yes, they want to explore new markets that will become available, but they want to remain trading in that market, and I think the membership of the customs union and single market is the most successful way forward on that. Plaid Cymru also wants to examine how we might firm up something that's been said over the last few weeks around payments and continuing support for the farming sector. Because obviously, what did happen between March and today was a general election, which changed nothing, politically. It didn't give a mandate for any sort of Brexit, has led to a mess in Westminster, and a lack of progress on the challenges set out in this report. But it has led to something that's emerged over the last week, which is a commitment by the Westminster Government that the farming payments are now maintained for this Parliament, and that's to 2022. So, we've gained a little bit of time, if you like, in that sense. I would like the Cabinet Secretary, when she has the opportunity, to confirm that she will maintain that support and it is the intention of this Government to continue that, because as she says in responding to the report, 'Continued CAP support beyond 2020 is dependent on decisions made by HM Treasury.' True, but Her Majesty's Treasury, or Her Majesty's Government, has said there will be support until 2022, so let's hear a similar kind of in-principle support from this Welsh Government.
Welsh: Yn gyntaf oll, a gaf fi ddweud bod Plaid Cymru yn cefnogi argymhellion y pwyllgor yn llawn? Rydym yn falch iawn ein bod wedi gallu cytuno ar adroddiad trawsbleidiol sy'n nodi'r materion a'r pryderon yn sgil gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd mor glir a'r hyn roedd angen i'r Llywodraeth hon fynd i'r afael ag ef, a Llywodraeth San Steffan hefyd. Gan fy mod yn cytuno â'r adroddiad, nid wyf eisiau siarad llawer am yr adroddiad ei hun, ond canolbwyntio yn hytrach ar ddau faes, rwy'n meddwl. Un yw'r maes lle byddai Plaid Cymru wedi mynd ymhellach na'r adroddiad - felly, i nodi sut y byddem yn ymateb i rai o'r heriau sydd i'w gweld yma - ac yn ail, yr hyn sydd wedi digwydd ers i ni gyhoeddi'r adroddiad. Oherwydd mae'n werth cofio: rydym yn cael y ddadl hon heddiw, ond cyhoeddwyd yr adroddiad ddiwedd mis Mawrth. Beth sydd wedi digwydd mewn gwirionedd? Rydym wedi cael sawl wythnos, bron i dri mis, ers hynny - mwy na thri mis, mewn gwirionedd; pedwar mis - pan fyddem wedi gallu gweld mwy o gynnydd ar rai o'r argymhellion hyn. Wel, gadewch i ni edrych ar ychydig o hynny. Yn gyntaf oll, i ddweud sut y byddem yn ymateb i'r adroddiad hwn. O'n safbwynt ni, rydym yn credu bod aelodaeth o'r farchnad sengl a'r undeb tollau yn parhau i fod y dull mwyaf hyfyw a chynaliadwy i gynnal ein sector amaethyddiaeth yma yng Nghymru. Mae gennym y farchnad honno sydd wedi bod mor llwyddiannus i ni hyd yn hyn. Mae ffermwyr yn awyddus i barhau i fasnachu gyda'r farchnad honno. Ydynt, maent eisiau archwilio marchnadoedd newydd a ddaw ar gael, ond maent yn awyddus i barhau i fasnachu yn y farchnad honno, ac rwy'n meddwl mai aelodaeth o'r undeb tollau a'r farchnad sengl yw'r ffordd fwyaf llwyddiannus ymlaen ar hynny. Mae Plaid Cymru hefyd am edrych ar sut y gallwn atgyfnerthu rhywbeth sydd wedi cael ei ddweud yn ystod yr ychydig wythnosau diwethaf ynglŷn â thaliadau a chymorth parhaus i'r sector ffermio. Oherwydd yn amlwg, yr hyn a ddigwyddodd rhwng mis Mawrth a heddiw oedd etholiad cyffredinol, na newidiodd ddim yn wleidyddol. Ni roddodd fandad ar gyfer unrhyw fath o Brexit, mae wedi arwain at lanast yn San Steffan, a diffyg cynnydd ar yr heriau a amlinellwyd yn yr adroddiad hwn. Ond mae wedi arwain at rywbeth a ddaeth yn amlwg dros yr wythnos diwethaf, sef ymrwymiad gan Lywodraeth San Steffan fod y taliadau amaethyddol yn cael eu cynnal bellach dros gyfnod y Senedd hon, sef hyd at 2022. Felly, rydym wedi ennill ychydig o amser, os hoffwch, yn hynny o beth. Hoffwn i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet gadarnhau, pan gaiff gyfle i wneud hynny, y bydd yn cynnal y cymorth ac mai bwriad y Llywodraeth hon yw parhau hynny, oherwydd fel y mae'n dweud wrth ymateb i'r adroddiad, 'Mae cymorth PAC parhaus y tu hwnt i 2020 yn dibynnu ar benderfyniadau a wneir gan Drysorlys Ei Mawrhydi.' Gwir, ond mae Trysorlys Ei Mawrhydi, neu Lywodraeth Ei Mawrhydi, wedi dweud y bydd cymorth tan 2022, felly gadewch i ni glywed yr un math o gefnogaeth mewn egwyddor gan y Llywodraeth hon yng Nghymru.