English: Thank you for the comments and the good wishes. In terms of ventilators, the 600 number includes provision we have and 200-odd that are on their way. In terms of whether the amount that we think we'll be able to procure will be enough, well that rather depends on the course of the outbreak. And I think it's really important in the honesty that we want to provide with each other that we don't provide figures to give a level of false assurance. I think it would be wrong to try and set an arbitrary time frame for this to be over or indeed to set an upper ceiling on the number of people that will be seriously affected. We will need to continue to understand the challenge and to try to rise to the challenge that affects us and the whole country. So, we will need to procure more, and we'll know what's enough as we get closer to the event. But no Member here or member of the public should take any misunderstanding that there is anything other than a significant effort between all four Governments to make sure that our health and care services are properly equipped to deal with the challenge. In terms of the doubling of critical care beds, my understanding is that the work to do that will be done imminently. And I'm sure that Members will have seen, for example, the excellent feature that Channel 4 News did on the work across the Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board to show the work that they have done to already double their critical care facilities on a range of their sites, and that's the work that they were able to do because elective activity was paused. And if we'd still had another week of elective activity, it wouldn't just have been the people coming in in that week, it would have been the fact that they'd been in a hospital bed recovering for a period of time afterwards in a number of cases, and our staff would not have been able to do that preparation work. So, I'm pleased that the step to pause that activity has meant that we are now much better prepared for what we know is coming. And in terms of knowing what's coming, I recognise they are entirely legitimate questions from Members across the spectrum to ask, because there are Labour Members in this place and others who have asked about the difference between the headline advice from the World Health Organization on testing and what we're doing here. And the advice that we directly have from our chief scientific adviser on health and from our chief medical officer, who works with his colleagues in the other three UK nations, is about how we deploy the resource that we currently have. Because if I said that our ambition is to deliver wide-scale community testing now, actually we don't have the capacity to do that, and if I tried to set out a wholly unachievable objective, we wouldn't be using the resource that we have in a way that was sensible or effective, and that's why the testing is targeted as it is. But it's why, as I've said, from the weekend and forward, as we expand our testing capability, we'll be able to test more groups of people and we'll be able to test a much wider group of people thereafter. So, the testing is a tool to help us understand what's happening with the outbreak. It's also a tool to help us to treat people and crucially to get staff back to work, because your point about families and testing is important, because the objective for having those staff in those groups is to release them to go back to work, and that must mean that you've got to test enough people within the family unit to make sure you can have that assurance for them to return. But, of course, testing isn't the only issue. We wouldn't be here today in this significantly reduced form with not just the guidance, but the requirements on social distancing, if we thought that testing was the only measure. We wouldn't be talking about ventilators and about PPE. So, it's a wide range of different measures that we have to deploy. I really do wish there was a single answer to resolve this but there is not. And on domestic violence and abuse, I recognise the concern the Member has raised. They've been a regular feature in our conversations in Government, to make sure that people are not trapped in an abusive relationship, in an abusive household, and to make sure that people are still supported. On community pharmacy, I've announced a range of measures to try to support community pharmacies, both the changes to hours that I announced on the weekend, the comments I've made about PPE delivery as well, but also the point that I'll be reiterating again later today, that if people require the delivery of their medication because they have to self-isolate, for most people it is possible for a trusted person to be able to undertake that delivery for them - it doesn't mean that they themselves then need to go into the home to do that. For example, I went to do my mother's shopping on the weekend. I saw her on Mother's Day, but I saw her after I'd left her shopping at her back door and I talked to her through a closed kitchen window. Now, I'm not a saint - my sister-in-law normally does my mum's shopping - but it is possible to go and do things that mean that that person doesn't need to go out, and, equally, that you don't have to call on delivery services. For some people, though, they won't have people in that position and they will then need to rely on a delivery service from community pharmacy. So, there are significant challenges ahead for our community services, for our community pharmacy network. On PPE in care settings, just to say I've covered a bit in my statement, and there'll be more today, but it's really important, in the difficult times that we face, that we don't collapse into thinking that something is better in another part of the country, because they got it first and they shouldn't. I've spoken to the Welsh Local Government Association, and to their lead spokespeople on social care, and all social care cabinet members at the start of this particular episode. And when I spoke at the start of this week, they were concerned about PPE going out into social care, and it was across the whole country. It wasn't as if Cardiff thought everything was wonderful, thank you very much - they were all concerned to make sure that deliveries were on their way and would be provided. So, no one part of the country is being advantaged to the disadvantage of another, and, hopefully, by the end of today, there'll be adequate supplies within social care settings. And on the private sector agreement, the 350 extra beds, I understand that that's imminent, and we should then be able to make use of that capacity. I'm not sure about the position of osteopathy services. I'm sure the chief medical officer will have a view, and medical directors as well about how useful that'll be for our staff. And on the third sector - not just in the future, but the third sector are really important for us now. The work that we are having to do to protect vulnerable people means that local authorities and the third sector need to collaborate and work with each other. The networks of volunteers that they are helping to co-ordinate are hugely important to actually practically support very large numbers of people that we've advised to isolate, and that's difficult. So, they'll be important in the future, yes, but actually they're crucially important in our effort to fight COVID-19 in the here and now.
Welsh: Diolch am y sylwadau a'r dymuniadau da. O ran peiriannau anadlu, mae'r 600 yn cynnwys darpariaeth sydd gennym ni a thua 200 sydd ar eu ffordd. O ran y cwestiwn a fydd y nifer y byddwn yn gallu eu caffael, yn ein barn ni, yn ddigon, wel mae hynny'n dibynnu ar sut fydd yr haint yn datblygu. Ac rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n bwysig iawn wrth inni geisio bod yn onest gyda'n gilydd nad ydym yn darparu ffigurau i roi rhywfaint o sicrwydd ffug. Rwy'n credu y byddai'n anghywir ceisio pennu amserlen fympwyol ar gyfer diwedd hyn neu osod terfyn uchaf ar nifer y bobl yr effeithir arnyn nhw'n ddifrifol. Bydd angen i ni barhau i ddeall yr her ac i geisio ymateb i'r her sy'n effeithio arnom ni a'r wlad i gyd. Felly, bydd angen i ni gaffael mwy, a byddwn ni'n gwybod beth sy'n ddigon wrth i ni agosáu at y digwyddiad. Ond ni ddylai unrhyw Aelod yma nac unrhyw aelod o'r cyhoedd gamddeall a chredu bod yna unrhyw beth heblaw ymdrech sylweddol rhwng y pedair Llywodraeth i wneud yn siŵr bod ein gwasanaethau iechyd a gofal wedi cael y cyfarpar priodol i ymdrin â'r her. O ran dyblu gwelyau gofal critigol, fy nealltwriaeth i yw y bydd y gwaith i wneud hynny'n cael ei wneud ar unwaith. Ac rwy'n siŵr y bydd Aelodau wedi gweld, er enghraifft, yr eitem ragorol a wnaeth Channel 4 News ar y gwaith ar draws Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Cwm Taf Morgannwg i ddangos y gwaith y maen nhw wedi'i wneud eisoes i ddyblu eu cyfleusterau gofal critigol ar sawl un o'u safleoedd, a dyna'r gwaith yr oedden nhw'n gallu ei wneud gan fod yr holl driniaethau dewisol wedi eu gohirio. A phe byddem ni wedi cael wythnos arall o driniaethau dewisol, ni fyddai wedi bod yn fater o bobl yn dod i mewn yr wythnos honno yn unig, ond y ffaith bod pobl mewn gwelyau mewn ysbyty yn gwella am gyfnod wedyn mewn nifer o achosion, ac ni fyddai ein staff wedi gallu gwneud y gwaith paratoi hwnnw. Felly, rwy'n falch bod y cam i ohirio'r triniaethau hynny wedi golygu ein bod bellach wedi paratoi'n well o lawer ar gyfer yr hyn yr ydym yn gwybod sydd ar y gorwel. Ac o ran gwybod beth sydd ar y gorwel, rwy'n cydnabod eu bod yn gwestiynau cwbl ddilys gan Aelodau o bob plaid i'w holi, oherwydd mae Aelodau Llafur yn y fan yma ac eraill sydd wedi holi ynghylch y gwahaniaeth rhwng y prif gyngor gan Sefydliad Iechyd y Byd ynghylch profion a beth yr ydym ni'n ei wneud yn y fan yma. Ac mae'r cyngor yr ydym yn ei gael yn uniongyrchol gan ein prif gynghorydd gwyddonol ar iechyd a chan ein prif swyddog meddygol, sy'n gweithio gyda'i gydweithwyr yn nhair cenedl arall y DU, yn ymwneud â'r ffordd yr ydym yn defnyddio'r adnodd sydd gennym ni ar hyn o bryd. Oherwydd pe bawn i'n dweud mai ein huchelgais yw darparu profion cymunedol ar raddfa eang nawr, mewn gwirionedd nid oes gennym ni'r gallu i wneud hynny, a phe bawn yn ceisio gosod amcan cwbl amhosib, ni fyddem yn defnyddio'r adnodd sydd gennym mewn ffordd synhwyrol nac effeithiol, a dyna pam fod y profion yn cael eu targedu fel y maen nhw. Ond dyna pam, fel y dywedais, o'r penwythnos ymlaen, wrth i ni ehangu ein gallu i brofi, y byddwn yn gallu profi mwy o grwpiau o bobl a byddwn yn gallu profi grŵp llawer ehangach o bobl wedi hynny. Felly, mae'r profion yn offeryn i'n helpu ni i ddeall beth sy'n digwydd o ran yr achosion. Mae hefyd yn offeryn i'n helpu i drin pobl ac yn hollbwysig i gael staff yn ôl i'r gwaith, gan fod eich sylw am deuluoedd a phrofion yn bwysig, oherwydd y nod o gael y staff hynny yn y grwpiau hynny yw er mwyn eu rhyddhau i ddychwelyd i'r gwaith, ac mae hynny'n sicr o olygu bod yn rhaid i chi brofi digon o bobl o fewn yr uned deuluol i wneud yn siŵr y gallwch chi gael y sicrwydd hwnnw er mwyn iddyn nhw ddychwelyd. Ond, wrth gwrs, nid profi yw'r unig fater. Ni fyddem ni yma heddiw yn y ffurf hon sydd wedi ei chwtogi'n sylweddol, gyda nid yn unig y canllawiau, ond y gofynion am gadw pellter cymdeithasol, pe baem ni'n credu mai profi oedd yr unig fesur. Ni fyddem yn sôn am beiriannau anadlu ac am gyfarpar diogelu personol. Felly, mae ynglŷn ag ystod eang o fesurau gwahanol y mae'n rhaid i ni eu defnyddio. Byddwn wrth fy modd petai un ateb i ddatrys hyn, ond nid oes un ateb yn unig. Ac o ran trais a cham-drin domestig, rwy'n cydnabod y pryder y mae'r Aelod wedi sôn amdano. Maen nhw wedi bod yn nodweddion rheolaidd yn ein sgyrsiau yng nghyfarfodydd y Llywodraeth, i wneud yn siŵr nad yw pobl yn cael eu dal mewn perthynas dreisgar, mewn cartref treisgar, ac i sicrhau fod pobl yn cael eu cefnogi o hyd. O ran fferylliaeth gymunedol, rwyf wedi cyhoeddi ystod o fesurau i geisio cefnogi fferyllfeydd cymunedol, y newidiadau i oriau a gyhoeddais ar y penwythnos, y sylwadau yr wyf wedi'u gwneud am gyflenwi cyfarpar diogelu personol hefyd, ond hefyd y sylw y byddaf yn ei ailadrodd eto yn ddiweddarach heddiw, os yw pobl yn gofyn am gael eu meddyginiaeth oherwydd bod yn rhaid iddyn nhw hunanynysu, i'r rhan fwyaf o bobl mae'n bosib i unigolyn y gellir ymddiried ynddo ymgymryd â'r gwaith hwnnw ar eu rhan - nid yw'n golygu bod angen iddo fynd i'r cartref i wneud hynny. Er enghraifft, es i i siopa dros fy mam ar y penwythnos. Gwelais hi ar Sul y Mamau, ond gwelais hi ar ôl imi adael ei siopa wrth ei drws cefn a siaradais â hi drwy ffenest y gegin a oedd wedi cau. Nawr, dydw i ddim yn sant - mae fy chwaer-yng-nghyfraith yn siopa dros fy mam fel arfer - ond mae modd mynd a gwneud pethau sy'n golygu nad oes angen i'r unigolyn hwnnw fynd allan, ac, yn yr un modd, nad oes rhaid i chi alw ar wasanaethau danfon nwyddau. Yn achos rhai pobl, fodd bynnag, ni fydd ganddyn nhw bobl yn y sefyllfa honno ac wedyn bydd angen iddyn nhw ddibynnu ar wasanaeth cyflenwi gan fferyllfa gymunedol. Felly, mae ein gwasanaethau cymunedol yn wynebu heriau sylweddol, felly hefyd ein rhwydwaith fferylliaeth gymunedol. O ran cyfarpar diogelu personol mewn lleoliadau gofal, hoffwn ddweud fy mod wedi cynnwys ychydig o hyn yn fy natganiad, a bydd mwy heddiw, ond mae'n bwysig iawn, yn y cyfnod anodd a wynebwn, na fyddwn yn credu bod rhywbeth yn well mewn rhan arall o'r wlad, oherwydd eu bod nhw yn ei gael yn gyntaf ac ni ddylen nhw ei gael. Rwyf wedi siarad â Chymdeithas Llywodraeth Leol Cymru, ac â'u prif lefarwyr ar ofal cymdeithasol, a holl aelodau'r cabinet gofal cymdeithasol pan ddechreuodd y sefyllfa hon. A phan siaradais â nhw ar ddechrau'r wythnos hon, roedden nhw'n pryderu am roi cyfarpar diogelu personol i'r maes gofal cymdeithasol, ac roedd hynny ar draws y wlad i gyd. Nid oedd fel petai Caerdydd yn meddwl bod popeth yn fendigedig, diolch yn fawr - roedd pob un ohonyn nhw yn awyddus i sicrhau bod nwyddau ar eu ffordd ac yn cael eu darparu. Felly, nid oes un rhan o'r wlad yn cael mantais gan achosi anfantais i ran arall, a gobeithio, erbyn diwedd heddiw, y bydd cyflenwadau digonol mewn lleoliadau gofal cymdeithasol. Ac o ran y cytundeb sector preifat, y 350 o welyau ychwanegol, deallaf fod hynny ar fin digwydd, ac wedyn dylai fod yn bosib defnyddio'r capasiti hwnnw. Dydw i ddim yn siŵr ynghylch sefyllfa gwasanaethau osteopathi. Rwy'n siŵr y bydd gan y prif swyddog meddygol farn, a chyfarwyddwyr meddygol hefyd ynghylch pa mor ddefnyddiol fydd hynny i'n staff. Ac o ran y trydydd sector - nid yn unig yn y dyfodol, ond mae'r trydydd sector yn wirioneddol bwysig i ni nawr. Mae'r gwaith yr ydym yn gorfod ei wneud i amddiffyn pobl sy'n agored i niwed yn golygu bod angen i awdurdodau lleol a'r trydydd sector gydweithio. Mae'r rhwydweithiau o wirfoddolwyr y maen nhw'n helpu i'w cydlynu yn hynod o bwysig i gefnogi'n ymarferol niferoedd mawr iawn o bobl yr ydym ni wedi eu cynghori i ynysu, ac mae hynny'n anodd. Felly, byddan nhw'n bwysig yn y dyfodol, byddant, ond mewn gwirionedd maen nhw'n hanfodol bwysig yn ein hymdrech i frwydro yn erbyn COVID-19 nawr.