techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 means that we have a requirement to interpret legislation, where we can, in the light of that legislation, and in accordance with the human rights in that Act. So, there is a difference, I believe, in a situation where the courts have looked at a clause or a part of our legislation, and said, 'Well, in order to ensure that it is consistent with human rights, this is the interpretation or this is how that clause should operate.' I see in that situation, where a court decision has been made, that it would be possible to bring that fact into the consolidation process so that it is on the face of legislation, for example. But if you have a situation where our legislation as it currently stands isn't consistent with the requirements of the Human Rights Act, and that there is more than one way of ensuring that consistency of our legislation with human rights - namely, the classic example of policy choices - I wouldn't then use the consolidation process to deal with that. So, if the answer is clear, and a court has decided that this is what needs to be put forward as a definition or an interpretation of this clause, that's a case where you could use an element of human rights to consolidate, but if it's about policy choice, then no. Does that answer your question?
Welsh: Wel, mae adran 3 o'r Ddeddf Hawliau Dynol 1998 yn golygu bod gofyniad arnom ni i ddehongli deddfwriaeth, lle gallwn ni, yng ngoleuni termau'r Ddeddf honno, felly yn gyson gyda'r hawliau dynol yn gyffredinol sydd yn y Ddeddf. Felly, mae gwahaniaeth, rwy'n credu, mewn sefyllfa lle mae'r llysoedd wedi edrych ar gymal neu ran o'n Deddfau ni a dweud, 'Er mwyn sicrhau ei bod hi'n gyson gyda hawliau dynol, dyma'r dadansoddiad, neu dyma sut dylai'r cymal hwnnw weithio.' Rwy'n gweld yn y sefyllfa honno, lle mae penderfyniad llys wedi bod, ei bod hi'n bosibl dod â'r ffaith honno mewn i'r broses o gydgrynhoi fel ei bod hi ar wyneb Deddf, er enghraifft. Ond os oes gyda chi sefyllfa lle mae ein cyfraith ni ar hyn o bryd efallai ddim yn gyson gyda gofyniad y Ddeddf, a bod mwy nag un ffordd o gysoni ein Deddf ni gyda hawliau dynol - hynny yw, dyna'r enghraifft glasurol o ddewisiadau polisi - fuaswn i ddim yn defnyddio'r broses o gydgrynhoi i ddelio â hynny. Felly, os yw'r ateb yn glir ac mae'r llys wedi penderfynu mai dyma sydd ei angen fel diffiniad neu fel dadansoddiad o'r cymal hwn, mae hynny yn achos lle gallech chi ddefnyddio elfen o hawliau dynol i grynhoi, ond os oes dewis polisi, na. Ydy hwnna yn ateb?
English: Yes. [ Inaudible.] So if you look at other systems where there's a code, does the law relating to precedents play such a strong role in those countries? Because what I'm thinking about on a practical level is that, ultimately - . I know we've moved on to the code now. But if, ultimately, there is some sort of code, some sort of document where people look at the law of Wales, in what way can you ensure that the law of precedent is part of that? It doesn't work in the same way in other jurisdictions, does it, where precedent doesn't have the same role in terms of the common law?
Welsh: Ydy. [ Anghlywadwy.] Os edrychwch chi ar systemau eraill lle mae yna god, ydy'r gyfraith ynglŷn ag achosion, sef precedents, yn chwarae rôl mor gryf yn y gwledydd hynny? Achos, beth rwy'n meddwl amdano yn ymarferol yw, os yn y pen - . Dwi'n gwybod ein bod ni'n symud ymlaen at y cod nawr. Ond, os yn y pen draw mae yna god o ryw fath, neu ryw fath o ddogfen lle mae pobl yn edrych ar gyfraith Cymru, ym mha ffordd gallech chi sicrhau bod cyfraith achosion yn rhan o hwnna? Dyw e ddim yn gweithio yn yr un ffordd mewn awdurdodaethau eraill, yw e, lle nad yw precedent yn chwarae'r un rôl ynglŷn â'r gyfraith gyffredin?
English: Thank you very much, Chair. So, to continue with the technical matters and the complex issues regarding codification, paragraphs 89 to 91 in chapter 4 refer to the need to safeguard legal structures from the codification process. So, a question that arises from that is: could you expand on this idea of using the Assembly's Standing Orders to maintain the structure of Welsh law? Could this constrain a future Government's approach to legislating, or perhaps expand it?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Gadeirydd. I barhau efo'r manylion technegol astrus, buasai rhai yn meddwl, ynglŷn â chodeiddio, mae paragraffau 89 i 91 ym mhennod 4 yn gofyn am yr angen i ddiogelu strwythurau cyfreithiol, efallai, wrth y broses o godeiddio. Felly, y cwestiwn sy'n deillio o hynna ydy: a fuasech chi'n ymhelaethu ar y syniad yma o ddefnyddio Rheolau Sefydlog y Senedd yma i gynnal strwythur cyfraith Cymru? A allai hyn gyfyngu ar ddull y Llywodraeth o ddeddfu yn y dyfodol, neu efallai ei ehangu?
English: Just to go back quickly to the early discussions that we had at the beginning of this process with the committee when the legislation started going through the Senedd, one of the first steps is to create the code, or one of the fundamental steps. The value of the codification process is involved in the question of maintaining the code for the future. That is, if you're just going to pass legislation outwith the code, that is going to weaken the value of the process for us as a legislature. In terms of what that means with regard to the Senedd's processes, that's a question for the Llywydd and for Members, but I would say that we need to start from the point where the Member who puts forward a Bill to change the law would need to justify why that wouldn't happen within the structure of the code, and then it would be up to the Senedd to decide whether it agrees with that argument or not. But I just want to be clear, because I know that Members have asked this question in the past: this is a question about where the law is published rather than the Senedd's ability and Members' ability to change the law. This doesn't affect that in any way; it's just a question of where you find or access the law when it's made.
Welsh: Jest i fynd nôl am eiliad yn gyflym i'r trafodaethau cynnar gawsom ni ar ddechrau'r broses yma yn y pwyllgor ar ddechrau'r Ddeddf yn mynd trwy'r Senedd, un o'r camau cyntaf yw creu'r cod, neu un o'r camau sylfaenol. Mae gwerth y broses o godeiddio ynghlwm yn y cwestiwn o gynnal y cod i mewn i'r dyfodol. Hynny yw, os ydych chi'n mynd i jest basio Deddf sydd tu allan i'r cod, mae hynny'n mynd i wanhau gwerth y broses i ni fel deddfwrfa. O ran beth mae hynny'n golygu o ran prosesau'r Senedd, wrth gwrs, cwestiwn i'r Llywydd ac i Aelodau yw hynny, ond buaswn i'n dweud bod angen cychwyn o'r cam lle byddai angen i'r Aelod sy'n cyflwyno Deddf i newid y gyfraith gyfiawnhau pam na ddylai hynny ddigwydd o fewn strwythur y cod, ac wedyn byddai'n rhaid i'r Senedd benderfynu p'un ai bod y Senedd yn cytuno gyda'r ddadl honno. Ond rwy jest eisiau bod yn glir, achos rwy'n gwybod bod Aelodau wedi codi'r cwestiwn yma yn y gorffennol: cwestiwn yw hyn am le mae'r gyfraith yn cael ei chyhoeddi yn hytrach na gallu'r Senedd a gallu'r Aelodau i newid y gyfraith. Dyw hyn ddim yn amharu ar hynny mewn unrhyw ffordd; mae jest yn gwestiwn o lle rŷch chi'n darganfod y gyfraith pan mae wedi cael ei gwneud.
English: Thank you for that. Moving on, paragraphs 93 and 94 refer to subordinate legislation. Could I ask, therefore, would the Counsel General's vision for codification mean that fewer pieces of subordinate legislation are laid before the Assembly in the future?
Welsh: Diolch am hynna. I symud ymlaen, mae paragraffau 93 a 94 yn ymdrin ag is-ddeddfwriaeth. Felly, a allaf i ofyn, a fyddai gweledigaeth y Cwnsler Cyffredinol ar gyfer codeiddio yn golygu y bydd llai o ddarnau o is-ddeddfwriaeth yn cael eu gosod gerbron y Senedd yn y dyfodol?
English: The question of complexity in the law, of course, is relevant to the organisation of primary legislation. But, the numbers and complexity of subordinate legislation is just as much of a problem, if not more so in some areas. The Senedd passed over 300 SIs in 2015, before it started the process of Brexit, even. So, this is where a great many of the challenges for us arise. And from following the principles that I outlined in the response to Carwyn Jones earlier, namely, trying to ensure that there's one set of regulations for each power to create regulations, and that the Senedd, I would hope, would find a way of being able to remake regulations including changes, and showing those changes to Members in a way that you described earlier, through tracking, for example. I would hope that that would be possible to ensure then that there is less subordinate legislation.
Welsh: Mae'r cwestiwn o gymhlethdod yn y gyfraith, wrth gwrs, yn perthyn i drefniant Deddfau sylfaenol. Ond, mae rhifau a chymhlethdod deddfwriaeth eilradd yn rhan sydd yn gymaint o broblem, efallai hyd yn oed yn fwy o broblem mewn rhai meysydd. Fe wnaeth y Senedd basio dros 300 o SIs yn 2015, cyn ein bod ni'n dechrau ar y broses o Brexit hyd yn oed. Felly, dyma le mae llawer o'r sialens i ni. Ac o ddilyn yr egwyddorion wnes i amlinellu yn yr ateb i Carwyn Jones yn gynharach, hynny yw, ceisio sicrhau mai un set o reoliadau sydd yn perthyn i bob pŵer i greu rheoliadau, a bod y Senedd, buaswn i'n gobeithio, yn darganfod ffordd o allu ail-wneud rheoliadau'n cynnwys newidiadau, a dangos y newidiadau i Aelodau yn y ffordd roeddech chi'n disgrifio gynnau, fel tracio, er enghraifft. Buaswn i'n gobeithio bod hynny'n bosib er mwyn sicrhau wedyn bod llai o rifau yn y ddeddfwriaeth eilradd.
English: Thank you for that. My next question is: will there be a different approach to the drafting of regulation-making powers in Bills?
Welsh: Diolch am hynny. Y cwestiwn nesaf ydy: a fydd dull gwahanol o ddrafftio pwerau llunio rheoliadau mewn Biliau?
English: I don't think that what we're talking about means that we have to draft powers in a different way. Perhaps there'll need to be responses in terms of Standing Orders to the process that we've just discussed, but, in terms of drafting powers, I don't think we need to do that.
Welsh: Dwi ddim yn credu bod yr hyn rŷn ni'n sôn amdano yn golygu bod angen drafftio pwerau mewn ffordd wahanol. Efallai bydd angen ymateb o ran Rheolau Sefydlog i'r prosesau rŷn ni newydd drafod, ond, o ran drafftio pwerau, dwi ddim wir yn credu bod angen gwneud hynny.
English: Thank you. There is a question here on changes to statutory instruments and how this committee would scrutinise such changes. But, I take it that the answer regarding tracking would make that clear, and from Dylan's answer earlier, if the changes are made clear, especially to members of this committee, it'll be clear what will have changed and it will make it easier for us to scrutinise without having to go through hundreds.
Welsh: Diolch. Mae yna gwestiwn yn y fan hyn ynglŷn â newidiadau i offerynnau statudol a sut fuasai'r pwyllgor hwn yn craffu ar unrhyw newidiadau. Ond, dwi'n cymryd mai'r ateb ynglŷn â tracio fydd yn gwneud hynny yn amlwg, o ateb Dylan hefyd yn gynharach, os bydd y newidiadau yn amlwg, yn enwedig i aelodau'r pwyllgor yma, beth sydd wedi newid, bydd hi'n gwneud hi'n haws i ni graffu heb orfod mynd drwy gannoedd.
English: That's what we'd like to see, and we would be willing to proceed on that basis. But, it's about how you want to scrutinise, and that's a question for the committee, but I would suggest that that would be a useful and effective way of doing that.
Welsh: Dyna hoffwn i weld a buaswn i'n barod i weithredu ar y sail honno. Ond wrth gwrs, mae'r cwestiwn o sut ŷch chi eisiau craffu yn gwestiwn i bwyllgor Senedd, ond buaswn i'n awgrymu bod hynny'n ffordd ddefnyddiol ac effeithiol o wneud hynny.
English: Okay, and the final question from me, again, paragraphs 93 and 94 refer to new procedures for the scrutiny of statutory instruments. Can you provide more information, on top of what you've already said, on that?
Welsh: Ocê, a'r cwestiwn olaf gennyf i felly, eto, mae paragraffau 93 a 94 yn cyfeirio at weithdrefnau newydd ar gyfer craffu ar offerynnau statudol. Allwch chi ddarparu mwy o wybodaeth, ar ben beth dŷch chi wedi'i ddweud eisoes, ynglŷn â hynny?
English: I think that what I've already said deals with the majority of that.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu bod beth rwyf wedi'i ddweud eisoes yn delio â'r rhan fwyaf o hynny.
English: I have received notification, under Standing Order 12.58, that the Minister for Health and Social Services, Vaughan Gething, will answer questions today on behalf of the First Minister. And the first question is from Siân Gwenllian.
Welsh: Dwi wedi cael gwybod, o dan Reol Sefydlog 12.58, y bydd y Gweinidog Iechyd a Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol, Vaughan Gething, yn ateb cwestiynau y prynhawn yma ar ran y Prif Weinidog. Ac mae'r cwestiwn cyntaf gan Siân Gwenllian.
English: Yes. The Welsh Government continues to work with Transport for Wales to improve train services around north Wales, for the north-east Wales metro, whilst investing in station improvements and the building of at least five new stations in north Wales.
Welsh: Gwnaf. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn parhau i weithio gyda Trafnidiaeth Cymru i wella gwasanaethau rheilffordd o amgylch y gogledd, ar gyfer metro gogledd-ddwyrain Cymru, gan fuddsoddi mewn gwelliannau i orsafoedd ac adeiladu o leiaf pum gorsaf newydd yn y gogledd.
English: Last week, there was confirmation that the situation with the Transport for Wales Pacers still hasn't been resolved, and if no agreement is reached, then there is a risk that some of them may have to be withdrawn from our railways, and that will, obviously, mean that services will decline for the people of Wales. So, can I just give your Government a word of warning? Don't think that you can downgrade services in north Wales by withdrawing trains from the tracks, and through running fewer services, in order for the more densely populated areas to have those trains, and to fill the gaps in losing these Pacers. The service provided across north Wales at the moment, and, indeed, from Cardiff to north Wales, is a joke.
Welsh: Yr wythnos diwethaf, fe gafwyd cadarnhad bod sefyllfa Pacers Trafnidiaeth Cymru yn dal heb gael ei datrys, ac os na fydd yna gytundeb efo'r cerbydau yma, mae peryg y bydd yn rhaid tynnu rhai ohonyn nhw oddi ar y traciau, ac, yn amlwg, bydd hynny'n golygu y bydd gwasanaethau yn dirywio i bobl Cymru. Gaf i jest roi gair o rybudd i'ch Llywodraeth chi? Peidiwch â meddwl bod modd i chi israddio'r gwasanaethau yn y gogledd drwy dynnu trenau oddi ar y traciau, a thrwy redeg llai o wasanaethau, er mwyn i'r ardaloedd mwy poblog gael y trenau, ac er mwyn llenwi'r bwlch o golli'r Pacers. Mae'r gwasanaeth sy'n cael ei gynnig ar draws y gogledd ar hyn o bryd, ac o Gaerdydd i'r gogledd, yn jôc fel y mae hi.
English: Well, I'm happy to confirm again that we're waiting a decision that's due at the end of November about the ability to continue with our current stock, because this Government certainly does not want to see a diminution in services because of the issues about the stock. This is in the hands of the UK Government, and the Minister for Economy and Transport has made clear his willingness and his desire to have this decision reached promptly. But I am happy to confirm to the Member that, far from disinvesting in north Wales, they are part of the national programme of investment, and, more than that, there will be new services from the middle of December onwards, between Machynlleth and Pwllheli, between Llandudno Junction and Llandudno, and also between Llandudno Junction and Blaenau Ffestiniog. This is a Government that is committed to continue to invest in every part of Wales. We finally take control of the franchise.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n hapus i gadarnhau eto ein bod ni'n aros am benderfyniad a ddisgwylir ddiwedd mis Tachwedd am y gallu i barhau â'n stoc bresennol, oherwydd yn sicr nid yw'r Llywodraeth hon eisiau gweld gwasanaethau yn dirywio oherwydd y problemau yn ymwneud â'r stoc. Mae hyn yn nwylo Llywodraeth y DU, ac mae Gweinidog yr Economi a Thrafnidiaeth wedi gwneud yn eglur ei barodrwydd a'i awydd i weld y penderfyniad hwn yn cael ei wneud yn brydlon. Ond rwy'n falch o gadarnhau i'r Aelod, yn hytrach na dadfuddsoddi yn y gogledd, maen nhw'n rhan o'r rhaglen fuddsoddi genedlaethol, ac, yn fwy na hynny, bydd gwasanaethau newydd o ganol mis Rhagfyr ymlaen, rhwng Machynlleth a Phwllheli, rhwng Cyffordd Llandudno a Llandudno, a hefyd rhwng Cyffordd Llandudno a Blaenau Ffestiniog. Mae hon yn Llywodraeth sydd wedi ymrwymo i barhau i fuddsoddi ym mhob rhan o Gymru. Rydym ni'n cymryd rheolaeth dros y fasnachfraint o'r diwedd.
English: In the March 2016 budget, the UK Government announced it was opening the door to a growth deal for north Wales, and that would embrace the Growth Track 360 document from the North Wales Economic Ambition Board, with ambitious proposals for rail infrastructure across the region. The Welsh Government says it's developing a high-quality and integrated transport system across north Wales. At the beginning of this month, the two Governments - UK and Welsh Governments - together with the North Wales Economic Ambition Board, signed the heads of terms and agreed seven programmes that will form the basis of the north Wales growth deal from next year, including strategic transport. What provision thus far has therefore been agreed for those programmes to prioritise rail, not just in the north-east and cross-border, although critical, but across the region, to Gwynedd and Anglesey too?
Welsh: Yng nghyllideb Mawrth 2016, cyhoeddodd Llywodraeth y DU ei bod yn agor y drws i fargen twf ar gyfer y gogledd, ac y byddai hynny'n cynnwys dogfen Growth Track 360 gan Fwrdd Uchelgais Economaidd Gogledd Cymru, gyda chynigion uchelgeisiol ar gyfer seilwaith rheilffyrdd ar draws y rhanbarth. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn dweud ei bod yn datblygu system drafnidiaeth integredig o ansawdd uchel ledled y gogledd. Ar ddechrau'r mis yma, llofnododd y ddwy Lywodraeth - Llywodraethau'r DU a Chymru - ynghyd â Bwrdd Uchelgais Economaidd Gogledd Cymru, benawdau'r telerau a chytuno ar saith rhaglen a fydd yn sail i fargen twf gogledd Cymru o'r flwyddyn nesaf ymlaen, gan gynnwys trafnidiaeth strategol. Pa ddarpariaeth hyd yn hyn sydd wedi'i chytuno felly ar gyfer y rhaglenni hynny i flaenoriaethu rheilffyrdd, nid yn unig yn y gogledd-ddwyrain ac ar draws y ffin, er bod hynny'n hollbwysig, ond ar draws y rhanbarth, i Wynedd ac Ynys Môn hefyd?
English: Well, the transport Minister set out previously the investment that we're making not only in the north Wales growth deal, but in particular in the north-east Wales metro as well. And we are pleased to be working together with partners, not just the UK Government - of course, we part-fund the north Wales growth deal - but working together with the North Wales Economic Ambition Board. I think this Government has a track record to be proud of in terms of wanting to promote north Wales for its economic activity and, indeed, investing in transport infrastructure.
Welsh: Wel, fe wnaeth y Gweinidog trafnidiaeth nodi'n flaenorol y buddsoddiad yr ydym ni'n ei wneud nid yn unig ym margen twf gogledd Cymru, ond yn arbennig yn metro gogledd-ddwyrain Cymru hefyd. Ac rydym ni'n falch o fod yn gweithio gyda'n partneriaid, nid Llywodraeth y DU yn unig - wrth gwrs, rydym ni'n ariannu bargen twf gogledd Cymru yn rhannol - ond gan weithio gyda Bwrdd Uchelgais Economaidd Gogledd Cymru. Rwy'n credu bod gan y Llywodraeth hon hanes i ymfalchïo ynddo o ran ei hawydd i hyrwyddo gogledd Cymru ar sail ei weithgarwch economaidd ac, yn wir, i fuddsoddi mewn seilwaith trafnidiaeth.
English: You boast here that the service is a proper service, but you only have to look at your own Twitter feed today to realise just how many complaints there are from Welsh football supporters, who have found that there is no room for them on trains from north Wales to travel down to see the game this evening. So, where is the management and the forecasting for these services, knowing quite well that there would be thousands of people travelling from north Wales? Once again, you're failing.
Welsh: Rŷch chi'n clochdar fan hyn fod y gwasanaeth yn un teilwng, ond, wrth gwrs, rŷch chi ddim ond yn gorfod edrych ar eich Twitter ffid chi heddiw, dwi'n siŵr, i sylweddoli gymaint o gwyno sydd yna'n barod gan gefnogwyr pêl-droed Cymru, sydd wedi ffeindio nad oes yna le iddyn nhw ar drenau o'r gogledd heddiw i deithio lawr i weld y gêm. Ble mae rheoli a rhagweld y gwasanaeth yma - gan wybod yn iawn y byddai yna filoedd o bobl eisiau teithio o'r gogledd? Unwaith eto, rŷch chi'n methu.
English: No, look, we are continuing to invest in a programme of investment in railway services across Wales, and in particular in north Wales too. We have been clear about the need to do that over a period of time, and the significant investment that is coming not only in new facilities at stations, but in new services, new capacities and, indeed, a range of measures to make sure that fares are cheaper for young people, in particular, to travel on the rail service - . We have a track record to be proud of. There is more to be done, and I'm proud to work alongside the Minister for Economy and Transport Minister to do just that.
Welsh: Na, edrychwch, rydym ni'n parhau i fuddsoddi mewn rhaglen o fuddsoddiad mewn gwasanaethau rheilffordd ledled Cymru, ac yn enwedig yn y gogledd hefyd. Rydym ni wedi bod yn eglur ynghylch yr angen i wneud hynny dros gyfnod o amser, a'r buddsoddiad sylweddol sy'n dod nid yn unig mewn cyfleusterau newydd mewn gorsafoedd, ond mewn gwasanaethau newydd, galluoedd newydd ac, yn wir, ystod o fesurau i sicrhau bod prisiau tocynnau yn rhatach i bobl ifanc, yn arbennig, i deithio ar y gwasanaeth rheilffyrdd - . Mae gennym ni hanes i fod yn falch ohono. Mae mwy i'w wneud, ac rwy'n falch o weithio gyda Gweinidog yr Economi a Thrafnidiaeth i wneud yn union hynny.
English: Thank you. We are proud to be the first country in the UK to introduce a system of deemed consent. Last year saw the highest ever number of organ donors in Wales and the highest consent rate in the UK, at 77 per cent.
Welsh: Diolch. Rydym ni'n falch mai ni yw'r wlad gyntaf yn y DU i gyflwyno system o gydsyniad tybiedig. Y llynedd, cafwyd y nifer uchaf erioed o roddwyr organau yng Nghymru a'r gyfradd gydsynio uchaf yn y DU, sef 77 y cant.
English: Diolch. As you've said, Wales has the highest organ donor rates in the United Kingdom and this is a huge success story. As the Minister will be aware, one individual donating their organs can transform the lives of eight other people at least. So, can I ask what more is the Welsh Government doing to promote organ donation within families to address the small number of family refusals for organ donation? And also, with organs from Welsh donors being part of a pan-European database of organs, what discussions have you had about any post-Brexit challenges?
Welsh: Diolch. Fel yr ydych chi wedi ei ddweud, Cymru sydd â'r cyfraddau rhoi organau uchaf yn y Deyrnas Unedig ac mae hyn yn llwyddiant ysgubol. Fel y bydd y Gweinidog yn ymwybodol, gall un unigolyn sy'n rhoi ei organau weddnewid bywydau wyth o bobl eraill o leiaf. Felly, a gaf i ofyn beth arall y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn ei wneud i hyrwyddo rhoi organau mewn teuluoedd i fynd i'r afael â'r nifer fach o deuluoedd sy'n gwrthod rhoi organau? A hefyd, gydag organau gan roddwyr yng Nghymru yn rhan o gronfa ddata o organau ar draws Ewrop, pa drafodaethau ydych chi chi wedi eu cael am unrhyw heriau ar ôl Brexit?