English: Well, thank you again for a number of important questions that are there. Can I just say, firstly, in terms of the general principle of self-determination? I think that's one that the First Minister and I and others have made clear in the past, that nations do have the right to self-determination. Our position in terms of referenda and what would happen with a Government that had a majority for a referendum is set out in 'Reforming our Union', and I think it was referred to very specifically in First Minister's questions the previous week. So, that position remains the Welsh Government's position, and is absolutely clear. In a recent series of lectures - one by Professor Ciaran Martin that I attended, of course - there was the significant constitutional issue raised in terms of what the routes should be for a country, for a Government that has a mandate, and that is, undoubtedly, part of the ongoing constitutional debate. In terms of the Supreme Court judgment, I do have, I think, two questions that are about to come that are specifically on that, so, if you don't mind, I'll refer to that specifically when those questions actually arise. But in terms of the point that Professor Emyr Lewis has raised, I've noted his comments with interest. He is, of course, correct to point out the differences that do exist between the Scottish settlement and the Welsh Ministers' executive powers. I would also say that there are, of course, significant differences between the powers of the Lord Advocate - my counterpart in Scotland - and their powers to be able to refer on constitutional matters, a power that is not a power that I specifically have in the Government of Wales Act. He also points out, of course, that these matters are incredibly complicated. My own very preliminary view on it - and, of course, we're still giving thought to some of these issues as they arise - is I think it's unlikely, in respect of section 60, section 62 and section 64, that they would actually legitimise the holding of a poll that asked specifically the sort of question that the Scottish Government put in their Bill, which clearly does relate to a reserved matter in terms of the constitution of the United Kingdom. The Supreme Court was very clear on that particular point. Any poll that we would have, I think, would need to relate to intra vires powers - powers the Welsh Government or the Senedd actually have. And, of course, in many ways, we've exercised those powers by the establishment of the independent commission, which looks broadly at the well-being of Wales within a constitutional context.
Welsh: Wel, diolch eto am nifer o gwestiynau pwysig yno. A gaf fi ddweud, yn gyntaf, ar egwyddor gyffredinol hunanbenderfyniaeth? Rwy'n credu bod hynny'n un y mae'r Prif Weinidog a minnau ac eraill wedi ei wneud yn glir yn y gorffennol, fod gan genhedloedd hawl i hunanbenderfyniaeth. Mae ein safbwynt ar refferenda a'r hyn a fyddai'n digwydd gyda Llywodraeth a oedd â mwyafrif o blaid refferendwm wedi'i nodi yn 'Diwygio ein Hundeb', ac rwy'n credu iddo gael sylw penodol iawn yn y cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog yr wythnos cynt. Felly, dyna yw safbwynt Llywodraeth Cymru o hyd, ac mae'n gwbl glir. Mewn cyfres ddiweddar o ddarlithoedd - un gan yr Athro Ciaran Martin a fynychais - cafodd mater cyfansoddiadol arwyddocaol ei godi ynglŷn â'r hyn y dylai'r llwybrau fod ar gyfer gwlad, ar gyfer Llywodraeth sydd â mandad, ac mae hynny, heb os, yn rhan o'r ddadl gyfansoddiadol barhaus. Ar ddyfarniad y Goruchaf Lys, rwy'n credu bod gennyf ddau gwestiwn ar fin dod sy'n trafod hynny'n benodol, felly, os nad oes ots gennych, fe gyfeiriaf at hynny'n benodol pan gaiff y cwestiynau hynny eu gofyn. Ond ar y pwynt mae'r Athro Emyr Lewis wedi ei godi, nodais ei sylwadau gyda diddordeb. Wrth gwrs, mae'n gywir i nodi'r gwahaniaethau sy'n bodoli rhwng setliad yr Alban a phwerau gweithredol Gweinidogion Cymru. Byddwn yn dweud hefyd fod gwahaniaethau sylweddol, wrth gwrs, rhwng pwerau'r Arglwydd Adfocad - fy swyddog cyfatebol yn yr Alban - a'u pwerau i allu cyfeirio ar faterion cyfansoddiadol, pŵer nad yw'n bŵer sydd gennyf fi yn benodol yn Neddf Llywodraeth Cymru. Mae hefyd yn nodi, wrth gwrs, fod y materion hyn yn hynod gymhleth. Fy marn ragarweiniol iawn fy hun arno - ac wrth gwrs, rydym yn dal i ystyried rhai o'r materion hyn wrth iddynt godi - yw fy mod yn credu ei bod yn annhebygol, mewn perthynas ag adran 60, adran 62 ac adran 64, y byddent yn cyfreithloni cynnal pleidlais yn gofyn yn benodol y math o gwestiwn a roddodd Llywodraeth yr Alban yn eu Bil, sy'n amlwg yn ymwneud â mater a gadwyd yn ôl o ran cyfansoddiad y Deyrnas Unedig. Roedd y Goruchaf Lys yn glir iawn ar y pwynt arbennig hwnnw. Rwy'n credu y byddai angen i unrhyw bleidlais y byddem ni yn ei chael ymwneud â phwerau intra vires - pwerau sydd gan Lywodraeth Cymru neu'r Senedd mewn gwirionedd. Ac wrth gwrs, mewn sawl ffordd, rydym wedi arfer y pwerau hynny drwy sefydlu'r comisiwn annibynnol, sy'n edrych yn gyffredinol ar lesiant Cymru o fewn cyd-destun cyfansoddiadol.