English: I will take this question, Bethan. Thank you very much for the invitation to join you today. I just wanted to explain that Rhodri, as head of BBC Wales, will respond in detail on the BBC channels and radio, and Nick can expand on programming issues. But if I could start with this particular question, I do think that our view, as was announced, namely that it was desirable to have two financial sources, was based on recognising the views of S4C at that time, as they were made known in the 'Pushing the Boundaries' publication. They were eager at that point to have two funding streams and we agreed that it was important that there shouldn't be a perception - and I do emphasise the word 'perception' - that there was no perception that the BBC, through taking over funding in its entirety, would be impacting, in any way, on the independence of the channel. That was our view and that view remains. But since the Euryn Ogwen Williams review, and since the Secretary of State for culture, media and sport declared that their independence is entirely safeguarded, then we're a little more relaxed about the situation. We have no view, either positive or negative. We know that this discussion will happen around 2021-22, when the five-year charter comes to an end. We are very eager that that discussion should be underpinned by some firm principles. For me, the most important principle is that the debate will be a public one and will be transparent in terms of the best way for S4C to move forward. That is also true, if I may say, about the BBC licence fee. There have been times when some arbitrary decisions have been taken behind closed doors and we don't want to see that happening again - we want the debate to be open.
Welsh: Fe wna i gymryd y cwestiwn yma, Bethan, i ddechrau. Diolch yn fawr am y gwahoddiad i fod yma. Roeddwn i jest eisiau egluro y bydd Rhodri, fel pennaeth BBC Cymru, yn ateb ar fanylder y sianel a'r sianeli ar y radio ac, wrth gwrs, Nick, hefyd yn ehangu ar y rhaglennu. Felly, os caf i ddechrau gyda'r cwestiwn yma, rydw i'n meddwl bod ein safbwynt ni, fel gwnaethom ni ei gyhoeddi fo, sef ei fod yn ddymunol i gael dwy ffrwd ariannol, wedi'i seilio, mewn gwirionedd, ar gydnabod barn S4C ar y pryd, fel y gwnaethon nhw ei gyhoeddi yn y cyhoeddiad, 'Gwthio'r Ffiniau - Pushing the Boundaries'. Roedden nhw'n awyddus bryd hynny i gael dwy ffrwd ac roeddem ni'n cytuno ei bod yn bwysig nad oedd yna ddim canfyddiad - ac rwy'n pwysleisio'r gair 'canfyddiad' - bod y BBC, trwy ariannu'n gyfan gwbl, yn sathru, mewn unrhyw ffordd, ar annibyniaeth y sianel. Dyna oedd ein safbwynt ni, ac mae'r safbwynt yna'n parhau. Ond, ers adolygiad Euryn Ogwen Williams, ac ers i'r Ysgrifennydd Gwladol dros ddiwylliant, y cyfryngau a chwaraeon ddatgan bod eu hannibyniaeth nhw yn hollol gadarn, yna rydym ychydig bach yn fwy ymlaciedig ynglŷn â'r sefyllfa. Nid oes gennym ni ddim barn, naill ai'n bositif nac yn negyddol. Rydym yn gwybod y bydd y drafodaeth yma'n digwydd o gwmpas 2021-22, pan fydd pum mlynedd siartr y BBC yn dod i ben. Rydym yn awyddus iawn bod y drafodaeth yna efo rhai egwyddorion cadarn. I mi, yr egwyddor mwyaf pwysig ydy y bydd y drafodaeth yn un gyhoeddus ac y bydd yn un dryloyw ynglŷn â'r ffordd orau i S4C symud ymlaen. Mae hynny'n wir hefyd, os caf ddweud, am drwydded y BBC. Mae yna adegau wedi bod pan mae pethau mympwyol wedi cael eu gwneud y tu hwnt i ddrysau caeedig, ac nid ydym eisiau hynny i ddigwydd eto - rydym eisiau i'r drafodaeth fod yn un agored.