techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: We have mechanisms in place to ensure that decisions on devolved areas remain our responsibility through the inter-governmental agreement. In relation to discussions relating to the trade negotiations, there are official-level discussions under way in order to give Wales a level of protection in advance of those discussions.
Welsh: Mae gennym fecanweithiau ar waith i sicrhau bod penderfyniadau ar feysydd datganoledig yn parhau'n gyfrifoldeb i ni drwy'r cytundeb rhynglywodraethol. O ran trafodaethau'n ymwneud â'r negodiadau masnach, mae trafodaethau ar lefel swyddogol yn mynd rhagddynt er mwyn sicrhau lefel o warchodaeth i Gymru cyn y trafodaethau hynny.
English: Thank you for your answer, Minister. You speak about mechanisms and discussions without much detail there, but I think that's probably because the fact of the matter is there will be very little Welsh Government could do to protect the NHS if the Westminster Government decided to sell it off. Plaid Cymru would obviously support you if, as the international relations Minister said on Monday, you would wish to take the Westminster Government to court on this. But the fact of the matter is that international trade is a reserved matter and powers over public procurement that could have been used to protect some aspects of our health services were given away as part of the inter-governmental agreement that you've referred to. I'm sure you've been following the Conservative leadership contest with the same mix of horror and disbelief as I have. We've had candidates admitting to crimes that usually lead to jail sentences, candidates wanting to roll back human rights, and, most frightening of all, the candidate considered to be the favourite in the race, Boris Johnson, indicating clearly his intention to plough ahead on a disastrous path towards a 'no deal' Brexit. Minister, were the next UK Prime Minister to decide to leave the EU without a deal and were they able to find a way to bypass Parliament, through prorogation perhaps, what steps could Welsh Government take to fully mitigate the disastrous consequences for Wales? These may be hypotheticals, but they are worryingly conceivable.
Welsh: Diolch ichi am eich ateb, Weinidog. Rydych yn sôn am fecanweithiau a thrafodaethau heb lawer o fanylion yn y fan honno, ond rwy'n credu efallai mai'r rheswm am hynny yw mai ychydig iawn y gallai Llywodraeth Cymru ei wneud i amddiffyn y GIG pe bai Llywodraeth San Steffan yn penderfynu ei werthu. Mae'n amlwg y byddai Plaid Cymru yn eich cefnogi pe baech chi, fel y dywedodd y Gweinidog cysylltiadau rhyngwladol ddydd Llun, yn dymuno mynd â Llywodraeth San Steffan i'r llys ar hyn. Ond y gwir amdani yw bod masnach ryngwladol yn fater a gadwyd yn ôl a bod pwerau dros gaffael cyhoeddus y gellid bod wedi'u defnyddio i ddiogelu rhai agweddau ar ein gwasanaethau iechyd wedi cael eu hildio fel rhan o'r cytundeb rhynglywodraethol y cyfeirioch chi ato. Rwy'n siŵr eich bod wedi bod yn dilyn y ras am arweinyddiaeth y Ceidwadwyr gyda'r un gymysgedd o arswyd ac anghrediniaeth â mi. Cawsom ymgeiswyr yn cyfaddef i droseddau sydd fel arfer yn arwain at ddedfryd o garchar, ymgeiswyr sydd eisiau cyfyngu ar hawliau dynol, ac yn fwyaf brawychus, yr ymgeisydd yr ystyrir ei fod yn ffefryn yn y ras, Boris Johnson, yn nodi'n glir ei fwriad i fwrw ymlaen ar lwybr trychinebus tuag at Brexit 'dim bargen'. Weinidog, pe bai Prif Weinidog nesaf y DU yn penderfynu gadael yr UE heb fargen ac yn gallu dod o hyd i ffordd o osgoi'r Senedd, drwy ei rhagderfynu efallai, pa gamau y gallai Llywodraeth Cymru eu cymryd i liniaru'n llawn y canlyniadau trychinebus i Gymru? Efallai fod y rhain yn ddamcaniaethol, ond maent yn boenus o bosibl.
English: We take every opportunity to stand up for the interests of the people of Wales in any engagement we have with any part of the UK, including most directly the UK Government. We will all, as Ministers, continue to do that. We take every possible opportunity to describe and to fight for the interests of the people of Wales. On the last supplementary, in relation to the question of preparations, I should say that the fact that I don't believe it is possible to fully mitigate the consequences of a 'no deal' Brexit does not mean that, as a responsible Government, we should not and do not take measured and proportionate preparations in order to anticipate the worst impact, and seek to do what we can to deal with them. We are, as I know that she's aware, taking a significant suite of steps across all portfolios in order to do that. Indeed, in the last few weeks, we've taken stock of what further steps we might be able to take with the prospect of a deferred exit date into the autumn. It remains important for us to do that, not withstanding our view that the damage ultimately can't be fully mitigated, to say the least. She makes the point about independence. Of course, we know that our colleagues in the Scottish Government advocate for that position there. The difference there is they stood on a manifesto arguing the case for independence and won, and therefore have claimed the entitlement to bring forward that legislation. That isn't the case here in Wales.
Welsh: Rydym yn manteisio ar bob cyfle i sefyll dros fuddiannau'r Cymry mewn unrhyw ymgysylltiad rhyngom ag unrhyw ran o'r DU, gan gynnwys Llywodraeth y DU yn fwyaf uniongyrchol. Fel Gweinidogion, bydd pawb ohonom yn parhau i wneud hynny. Manteisiwn ar bob cyfle posibl i ddisgrifio ac i frwydro dros fuddiannau'r Cymry. Ar y cwestiwn atodol olaf, mewn perthynas â pharatoadau, dylwn ddweud nad yw'r ffaith nad wyf yn credu ei bod yn bosibl lliniaru canlyniadau 'dim bargen' yn llawn yn golygu na ddylem ni ac nad ydym ni, fel Llywodraeth gyfrifol, yn gweithredu paratoadau pwyllog a chymesur er mwyn rhagweld yr effeithiau waethaf, a cheisio gwneud yr hyn a allwn i ymdopi â hwy. Fel y gwn ei bod yn gwybod, rydym yn rhoi cyfres o gamau sylweddol ar waith ar draws pob portffolio er mwyn gwneud hynny. Yn wir, dros yr ychydig wythnosau diwethaf, rydym wedi bod yn ystyried pa gamau pellach y gallem eu cymryd o ystyried bod y dyddiad ymadael wedi'i ohirio tan yr hydref. Mae'n bwysig o hyd ein bod yn gwneud hynny, er ein bod o'r farn na ellir lliniaru'r difrod yn llawn yn y pen draw, a dweud y lleiaf. Mae hi'n gwneud y pwynt am annibyniaeth. Wrth gwrs, gwyddom fod ein cymheiriaid yn Llywodraeth yr Alban yn dadlau dros y safbwynt hwnnw yn y fan honno. Y gwahaniaeth yno yw eu bod wedi sefyll ar faniffesto'n dadlau'r achos dros annibyniaeth ac wedi ennill, ac felly maent wedi ennill yr hawl i gyflwyno'r ddeddfwriaeth honno. Nid yw hynny'n wir yma yng Nghymru.
English: Welsh ports are a critical international gateway and source of high-quality jobs. This could easily be preserved if we remain in the single market and the customs union. Facing the risk of a catastrophic 'no deal', we are working closely with local partners to mitigate the damage to our ports.
Welsh: Mae porthladdoedd Cymru yn borth rhyngwladol hollbwysig ac yn ffynhonnell swyddi o ansawdd uchel. Gellid gwarchod hyn yn hawdd os arhoswn yn y farchnad sengl a'r undeb tollau. Gan wynebu'r risg drychinebus o 'ddim bargen', rydym yn gweithio'n agos gyda phartneriaid lleol i liniaru'r niwed i'n porthladdoedd.
English: Thank you very much for that. As you know, there are a fair few ports in my region, and one of the opportunities for Wales if we leave the EU could be the development of free ports, as they would allow for goods to be imported to parts of Wales, stored or manufactured into finished products, and then exported, all without taxes and tariffs. Of course, we have free ports in the UK already. Last year, the economy Minister said he'd asked Haven Waterway enterprise zone to look at creating a free port. However, in February this year you told Adam Price that it's difficult to see how free ports or free zones could exist within a customs union. Now, your Government's now confirmed that it will campaign to stay within the EU. So, does that mean that the development of free ports in Wales is off the table?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn am hynny. Fel y gwyddoch, mae cryn dipyn o borthladdoedd yn fy rhanbarth i, ac un o'r cyfleoedd i Gymru os gadawn yr UE fyddai datblygu porthladdoedd rhydd, gan y byddent yn caniatáu i nwyddau gael eu mewnforio i rannau o Gymru, eu storio neu eu cynhyrchu'n gynnyrch gorffenedig cyn eu hallforio heb drethi a thariffau. Wrth gwrs, mae gennym borthladdoedd rhydd yn y DU yn barod. Y llynedd, dywedodd Gweinidog yr economi ei fod wedi gofyn i ardal fenter Dyfrffordd y Ddau Gleddau ystyried creu porthladd rhydd. Fodd bynnag, ym mis Chwefror eleni, fe ddywedoch chi wrth Adam Price ei bod hi'n anodd gweld sut y gallai porthladdoedd rhydd neu ardaloedd rhydd fodoli mewn undeb tollau. Nawr, cadarnhaodd eich Llywodraeth y bydd yn ymgyrchu i aros o fewn yr UE. Felly, a yw hynny'n golygu na ellir ystyried datblygu porthladdoedd rhydd yng Nghymru?
English: We recognise the potential benefits of free ports generally, but there are practical challenges, which is what I was referring to in my earlier response, I think, which is around loss of tax revenue, displacement, sustainability, and so on. Decisions on free ports and customs arrangements more generally, obviously, are in the hands of the UK Government. From our point of view, the economic interest of our ports and of our economy at large is best protected by remaining part of a customs union, and if that comes at the cost of being able to develop particular free port discussions, then I think that is a price worth paying in the overall picture in terms of the overall impact on our economy.
Welsh: Rydym yn cydnabod manteision posibl porthladdoedd rhydd yn gyffredinol, ond ceir heriau ymarferol, sef yr hyn y cyfeiriais ato yn fy ymateb cynharach, rwy'n credu, sy'n ymwneud â cholli refeniw treth, dadleoli, cynaliadwyedd, ac yn y blaen. Yn amlwg, mae penderfyniadau ynghylch porthladdoedd rhydd a threfniadau tollau yn fwy cyffredinol yn nwylo Llywodraeth y DU. O'n safbwynt ni, y ffordd orau i ddiogelu buddiannau economaidd ein porthladdoedd a'n heconomi yn gyffredinol yw drwy aros yn rhan o undeb tollau, ac os digwydd hynny ar draul gallu datblygu trafodaethau penodol am borthladdoedd rhydd, credaf fod hwnnw'n bris gwerth ei dalu yn y darlun cyffredinol o'r effaith lawn ar ein heconomi.
English: Quite simply, the port of Holyhead in my constituency is one of the major ports between the UK and the EU. Would the Minister agree with me that a Brexit of any kind is bound to pose significant challenges to the port but that leaving without a deal would certainly lead to the loss of trade through that port?
Welsh: Yn syml iawn, mae porthladd Caergybi yn fy etholaeth i yn un o'r prif borthladdoedd rhwng Prydain a'r Undeb Ewropeaidd. Ydy'r Gweinidog yn cytuno â fi y byddai Brexit o unrhyw fath yn siŵr o osod heriau difrifol i'r porthladd ond y byddai gadael heb gytundeb yn sicr o arwain at golli masnach drwy'r porthladd hwnnw?
English: I thank the Member for the question. I was in Holyhead recently, discussing this question with the people in the port there. They have plans, of course, for all sorts of Brexit scenarios. As a Government, we have been preparing, as the Member will know, back-up plans, contingency plans, regarding the impact on transport of any form of exit, and specifically of leaving without a deal. We cannot rely on infrastructure schemes in Dublin and Rosslare in terms of timing that to ensure that transport will be able to move easily post Brexit, if we leave the EU. So, it's important that we have contingency plans for that, but the core of the Member's question is whether any kind of Brexit is better, and the answer, of course, is 'no'.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn. Fues i lan yng Nghaergybi yn ddiweddar yn trafod y cwestiwn hyn gyda'r bobl yn y porthladd. Maen nhw'n gwneud cynlluniau, wrth gwrs, ar gyfer pob mathau o Brexit yn y porthladd yng Nghaergybi. Rydym ni, fel Llywodraeth, wedi bod yn paratoi, fel bydd yr Aelod yn gwybod, cynlluniau wrth gefn ar gyfer yr impact ar drafnidiaeth o adael mewn unrhyw ffordd, a gadael heb gytundeb yn benodol. Allwn ni ddim dibynnu ar gynlluniau isadeiledd yn Dublin a Rosslare o ran amseru hynny i sicrhau bod trafnidiaeth yn gallu symud yn rhwydd ar ôl i ni adael, os gwnawn ni adael. Felly, mae wedi bod yn bwysig i ni wneud cynlluniau wrth gefn ar gyfer hynny, ond wrth wraidd cwestiwn yr Aelod mae'r syniad a fyddai unrhyw Brexit yn well nag aros fel aelod o'r Undeb Ewropeaidd, a'r ateb i'r cwestiwn hwnnw, wrth gwrs, yw 'na'.
English: Counsel General, news yesterday highlighted that the EU Commission is in fact working on a plan to use IT solutions to help goods cross the Irish border after Brexit. Similar plans have been put into place by the French Government in Calais. Indeed, as far as back as 2016, the EU Parliament itself compiled a report that showed how a smart border can be used between the EU and the UK. What assessments has the Welsh Government done on IT solutions, and could you publish any such preparation, if we have any?
Welsh: Gwnsler Cyffredinol, yn ôl y newyddion ddoe, mae Comisiwn yr UE yn gweithio ar gynllun i ddefnyddio datrysiadau TG i helpu nwyddau i groesi'r ffin Wyddelig ar ôl Brexit. Rhoddodd Llywodraeth Ffrainc gynlluniau tebyg ar waith yn Calais. Yn wir, cyn belled yn ôl â 2016, lluniodd Senedd yr UE ei hun adroddiad a ddangosai sut y gellir defnyddio ffin glyfar rhwng yr UE a'r DU. Pa asesiadau y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi'u gwneud o atebion TG, ac a allech gyhoeddi unrhyw baratoadau o'r fath, os oes rhai gennym?
English: Our view is that the sort of IT solutions that the Member is describing in her question are essentially long-term solutions to this. Of course, we know that there are IT activities under way to seek to ameliorate some of the consequences of a Brexit of any sort. Those are matters that are obviously, as she will be aware, driven principally by HMRC, which is reserved to the UK Government. But the prospect that that is a solution to the level of disruption that could easily be caused by a Brexit of any sort, and in particular a 'no deal 'Brexit, I think is something of a fantasy.
Welsh: Ein barn ni yw bod y math o atebion TG y mae'r Aelod yn eu disgrifio yn ei chwestiwn yn atebion hirdymor i hyn yn y bôn. Wrth gwrs, gwyddom fod yna weithgareddau TG ar y gweill i geisio lleddfu rhai o ganlyniadau Brexit o unrhyw fath. Fel y bydd yn gwybod, mae'r rheini'n faterion sy'n amlwg wedi'u hysgogi'n bennaf gan Cyllid a Thollau ei Mawrhydi, sy'n fater a gadwyd yn ôl i Lywodraeth y DU. Ond rwy'n credu bod y posibilrwydd fod hwnnw'n ateb i'r lefel o aflonyddwch a allai'n hawdd gael ei achosi gan Brexit o unrhyw fath, ac yn arbennig Brexit 'dim bargen', yn ffantasi braidd.
English: The current EU structural funds programmes are investing £206 million to support a total of 159,000 apprenticeships across Wales between 2015 and 2023. This is part of the overall investment of £861 million that the EU programmes are making in skills and in employability in Wales.
Welsh: Mae rhaglenni cronfeydd strwythurol cyfredol yr UE yn buddsoddi £206 miliwn i gefnogi cyfanswm o 159,000 o brentisiaethau ledled Cymru rhwng 2015 a 2023. Mae hwn yn rhan o'r buddsoddiad cyffredinol o £861 miliwn y mae rhaglenni'r UE yn ei wneud mewn sgiliau a chyflogadwyedd yng Nghymru.
English: During yesterday's debate on the shared prosperity fund, Nick Ramsay said that there are unanswered questions about the future of the shared prosperity fund, which led me once again to question why on earth he's a Tory. He surely too nice and intelligent for that kind of activity. [ Laughter.] I think the future - [ Interruption.] Well, let me get to the question. The future of the structural funds has a huge impact for skills and development and training in my constituency. In Caerphilly town, ACT Training have benefited from European social fund support, which delivers Government apprenticeship, traineeship and Jobs Growth Wales programmes. In Ystrad Mynach, Educ8 benefited from the same and, of course, Coleg y Cymoedd have built into their work ESF-funded programmes too. So, would you agree with me - and perhaps with Nick Ramsay - that the shared prosperity fund needs to be clearly directed towards these programmes and that the UK Government needs to make a commitment on that fund and that that direction needs to be put towards particularly those kinds of educational programmes too?
Welsh: Yn ystod y ddadl ddoe ar y gronfa ffyniant gyffredinol, dywedodd Nick Ramsay fod yna gwestiynau heb eu hateb am ddyfodol y gronfa ffyniant gyffredinol a'm harweiniodd unwaith eto i holi pam ar y ddaear y mae'n Dori. Mae'n sicr yn rhy neis a deallus i'r math hwnnw o weithgaredd. [ Chwerthin.] Rwy'n credu bod dyfodol - [ T orri ar draws.] Wel, gadewch i mi ofyn y cwestiwn. Mae dyfodol y cronfeydd strwythurol yn effeithio'n enfawr ar sgiliau a datblygiad a hyfforddiant yn fy etholaeth. Yn nhref Caerffili, mae ACT Training wedi elwa ar gymorth cronfa gymdeithasol Ewrop, sy'n cyflwyno prentisiaethau'r Llywodraeth, hyfforddeiaeth a rhaglenni Twf Swyddi Cymru. Yn Ystrad Mynach, elwodd Educ8 o'r un peth ac wrth gwrs, mae Coleg y Cymoedd wedi cynnwys rhaglenni a ariennir gan gronfa gymdeithasol Ewrop yn eu gwaith hefyd. Felly, a fyddech yn cytuno â mi - ac efallai â Nick Ramsay - fod angen cyfeirio'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredinol yn glir tuag at y rhaglenni hyn a bod angen i Lywodraeth y DU wneud ymrwymiad mewn perthynas â'r gronfa honno a bod angen ei chyfeirio hefyd tuag at y mathau hynny o raglenni addysgol yn arbennig?
English: Well, I thank the Member for his supplementary question, which I think illustrates, doesn't it, in a very real way, in his constituency, the beneficial impact that EU programmes have had in the lives of individual constituents and that, sometimes, the debates we have around EU programmes are at a level of generality, and he's brought that down to the connection with individual communities and constituencies. I absolutely would echo the sentiment in his question that it is absolutely vital for the UK Government now to provide those concrete assurances, which will enable us to continue to make use of those funds here in Wales, to make use of them differently perhaps - align them better with our priorities here - and to deliver on the ground the sorts of advantages those funds have delivered over many, many years. It's incumbent now on the UK Government to put us in Wales in that position. Those decisions should be taken by the Welsh Government, as they have been, and the funds should be made available to the fullest extent that they are currently available. We are, as the Assembly in passing its motion yesterday made clear, very concerned that the UK Government is dealing with an issue of such vital importance to Wales in a way that is apparently so disrespectful of the devolution boundary. I know that he will join me in calling on the UK Government to reflect on that and under, perhaps, a new Prime Minister to change course, to make real the commitments that we will have not a penny less and not a power taken away.
Welsh: Wel, hoffwn ddiolch i'r Aelod am ei gwestiwn atodol y credaf ei fod yn dangos, onid yw, mewn ffordd real iawn, yn ei etholaeth ef, yr effaith lesol y mae rhaglenni'r UE wedi'i chael ym mywydau etholwyr unigol ac weithiau, fod y dadleuon a gawn am raglenni'r UE yn gyffredinol eu natur, ac mae ef wedi dod â hynny i lawr i'r cysylltiad â chymunedau ac etholaethau unigol. Buaswn yn bendant yn adleisio'r teimlad yn ei gwestiwn ei bod yn gwbl hanfodol i Lywodraeth y DU roi'r sicrwydd pendant hwnnw yn awr a fydd yn ein galluogi i barhau i ddefnyddio'r cronfeydd hynny yma yng Nghymru, i'w defnyddio'n wahanol efallai - eu halinio'n well â'n blaenoriaethau ni yma - ac i sicrhau ar lawr gwlad y mathau o fanteision y mae'r cronfeydd hynny wedi'u darparu dros lawer iawn o flynyddoedd. Mae'n ddyletswydd ar Lywodraeth y DU yn awr i'n rhoi ni yng Nghymru yn y sefyllfa honno. Dylai'r penderfyniadau hynny gael eu gwneud gan Lywodraeth Cymru, fel y maent wedi arfer cael eu gwneud, a dylai'r cronfeydd fod ar gael yn llawn fel y maent ar gael ar hyn o bryd. Fel y gwnaeth y Cynulliad yn glir wrth basio ei gynnig ddoe, rydym yn bryderus iawn fod Llywodraeth y DU yn ymdrin â mater mor hanfodol bwysig i Gymru mewn modd sydd, yn ôl pob golwg, mor amharchus o'r ffin datganoli. Gwn y bydd yn ymuno â mi i alw ar Lywodraeth y DU i ystyried hynny ac i newid trywydd, efallai, o dan Brif Weinidog newydd, er mwyn gwireddu'r ymrwymiadau na fyddwn yn cael yr un geiniog yn llai ac na fydd pŵer yn cael ei gipio oddi wrthym.
English: The Member started referring to the benefits that young people have received as a consequence of some of this support, and he's absolutely right to do that. A number of the EU-funded programmes have specifically been targeted on getting young people into employment, improving their skills, and so it's hardly a surprise, is it, that younger people can see more clearly, perhaps, some of the benefits of continued participation in EU programmes than, perhaps, other parts of society? He talks about providing solutions to the question of how the shared prosperity fund can be designed. I wish there had been an opportunity to do that. The truth of the matter is, when I spoke with the Secretary of State for Wales, I specifically offered the support of the Welsh Government in designing a consultation that would work for Wales and would reflect the principles that we feel are echoed in all parts of Welsh society, economy and public services, and that has not been taken up. It is absolutely essential that we here, as the Welsh Government, are able to design a system that best supports the young people that he refers to in his question across Wales, particularly in disadvantaged communities. And until we get the realisation of those commitments by the UK Government, we're not going to be in a position to do that.
Welsh: Dechreuodd yr Aelod gyfeirio at y manteision y mae pobl ifanc wedi'u cael o ganlyniad i rywfaint o'r cymorth hwn, ac mae'n llygad ei le i wneud hynny. Mae nifer o'r rhaglenni a ariennir gan yr UE wedi cael eu targedu'n benodol ar gyfer helpu pobl ifanc i gael gwaith, a gwella eu sgiliau, ac felly nid yw'n syndod fod pobl iau yn gallu gweld rhai o'r manteision a ddaw yn sgil parhau i gyfranogi yn rhaglenni'r UE yn gliriach na rhannau eraill o'r gymdeithas o bosibl. Mae'n sôn am ddarparu atebion i'r cwestiwn ynglŷn â sut y gellir llunio'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin. Hoffwn pe bai cyfle wedi bod i wneud hynny. Y gwir amdani yw, pan siaradais ag Ysgrifennydd Gwladol Cymru, cynigiais gefnogaeth Llywodraeth Cymru yn benodol i'r gwaith o lunio ymgynghoriad a fyddai'n gweithio i Gymru ac a fyddai'n adlewyrchu'r egwyddorion y teimlwn eu bod yn cael eu hadleisio ym mhob rhan o gymdeithas, economi a gwasanaethau cyhoeddus Cymru, ac ni fanteisiwyd ar hynny. Mae'n gwbl hanfodol ein bod ni yma, fel Llywodraeth Cymru, yn gallu cynllunio system sy'n rhoi'r gefnogaeth orau i'r bobl ifanc y mae'n cyfeirio atynt yn ei gwestiwn ar draws Cymru, yn enwedig mewn cymunedau difreintiedig. A hyd nes y gwelwn yr ymrwymiadau hynny'n cael eu gwireddu gan Lywodraeth y DU, ni fyddwn mewn sefyllfa i wneud hynny.
English: I have pressed the UK Government Ministers to prepare for a second referendum in meetings with both the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. I have not so far discussed with them or other stakeholders what the question or questions might be.
Welsh: Rwyf wedi pwyso ar Weinidogion Llywodraeth y DU i baratoi ar gyfer ail refferendwm mewn cyfarfodydd gyda Changhellor Dugiaeth Caerhirfryn a'r Ysgrifennydd Gwladol dros Adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd. Nid wyf wedi trafod gyda hwy na rhanddeiliaid eraill hyd yma beth fyddai'r cwestiwn neu'r cwestiynau.