English: I thank the First Minister for his responses to Leanne Wood. I feel, Deputy Llywydd, I have to convey that we need a bit more ambition. I fully understand what the First Minister is saying, in that if we can get youth justice devolved very quickly, if we can get the probation service devolved very quickly, and if we can get additional powers on women offenders, that would be welcome. But that still leaves - . The majority of people going into the prison system are actually adult men, and we know the devastating effect that that can have on them and on, of course, their families, as he rightly points out. With regard to the probation service, I'm sure the First Minister is aware that the rates of sickness for probation officers in the privatised elements of the service are three times higher than those in the National Probation Service. It's clearly not a system that is working, and while we very much welcome the steps that are being taken towards creating a Welsh probation service, it's my understanding that, at the moment, that would only include one-to-one work with offenders. Now, if we are to reduce, as the First Minister has identified he wishes to do, the rate of custodial sentences in Wales, we have to have stronger and more credible rehabilitative community penalties. So, as part of his work to seek the devolution of the probation service, will he seek as a matter of urgency to ensure that responsibilities for group work and for what was called community service for unpaid work - which is, of course, seen as a credible sentence by the community, because they can see the element of punishment there - are included in any developments of a Welsh probation service, because otherwise we'll have a split system and won't be able to be consistent?
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Prif Weinidog am ei ymatebion i Leanne Wood. Rwy'n teimlo, Dirprwy Lywydd, bod yn rhaid i mi gyfleu bod angen ychydig mwy o uchelgais arnom. Rwy'n deall yn llwyr yr hyn y mae'r Prif Weinidog yn ei ddweud, o'r safbwynt os gallwn ni gael cyfiawnder ieuenctid wedi'i ddatganoli yn gyflym iawn, ac os gallwn ni gael pwerau ychwanegol o ran troseddwyr benywaidd, byddai hynny i'w groesawu. Ond mae hynny'n dal i adael - . Dynion sy'n oedolion yw mwyafrif y bobl sy'n mynd i mewn i'r system carchardai mewn gwirionedd, ac rydym ni'n ymwybodol o'r effaith ddinistriol y gall hynny ei chael arnyn nhw ac ar eu teuluoedd, wrth gwrs, fel y mae e'n ei ddweud yn briodol. O ran y gwasanaeth prawf, rwy'n siŵr bod y Prif Weinidog yn ymwybodol bod cyfraddau salwch swyddogion prawf yn yr elfennau o'r gwasanaeth sydd wedi eu preifateiddio dair gwaith yn uwch na'r rhai yn y Gwasanaeth Prawf Cenedlaethol. Mae'n amlwg nad yw'n system sy'n gweithio, ac er fy mod i'n croesawu'n fawr y camau sy'n cael eu cymryd tuag at greu gwasanaeth prawf Cymru, fy nealltwriaeth i yw, ar hyn o bryd, y byddai hwnnw'n cynnwys gwaith un i un gyda throseddwyr yn unig. Nawr, os ydym ni'n mynd i leihau, fel y mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi nodi y mae'n dymuno ei wneud, cyfradd y dedfrydau o garchar yng Nghymru, mae'n rhaid i ni gael cosbau cymunedol adsefydlu cryfach a mwy credadwy. Felly, yn rhan o'i waith i geisio datganoli'r gwasanaeth prawf, a wnaiff ef geisio fel mater o frys sicrhau bod cyfrifoldebau am waith grŵp a'r hyn a alwyd yn wasanaeth cymunedol am waith di-dâl - sydd, wrth gwrs, yn cael ei ystyried fel dedfryd gredadwy gan y gymuned, gan eu bod yn gallu gweld yr elfen o gosb yn hynny o beth - yn cael eu cynnwys mewn unrhyw ddatblygiadau o wasanaeth prawf Cymru, oherwydd fel arall bydd gennym ni system ranedig ac ni fyddwn yn gallu bod yn gyson?