techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Okay. Sorry. Any further questions in relation to this particular section or any further comments in relation to these issues? I think it was just an important point to note the difference, if you're a contractor, between the contract if it's managed by the health boards compared with - . Well, most of them, as I understand it, are in the independent sector, so they wouldn't come under the auspices of this particular standard. Would you like to see a change to that or would you rather not see a change?
Welsh: Ocê. Sori. A oes mwy o gwestiynau ynglŷn â'r adran yma neu unrhyw sylwadau ychwanegol ar yr adran yma? Rwy'n credu roedd e jest yn bwynt pwysig i nodi'r gwahaniaeth, os ydych chi'n gontractwr, os yw'r contract yn cael ei redeg drwy'r byrddau iechyd i gymharu wedyn gyda - . Wel, yn ôl beth rwy'n ei ddeall, mae'r rhan fwyaf ohonyn nhw yn y sector annibynnol, felly ni fyddant yn cael eu cyffwrdd gan y rheoliadau. A fyddech chi eisiau gweld newid i hynny neu a fyddech chi ddim eisiau gweld newid i hynny?
English: That isn't adequate in my view, in that there isn't a right for patients. Let's be honest, it's a small percentage at the moment who aren't in that independent sector. Most patients in Wales - in terms of the standards as they currently exist - would have no right to a face-to-face service through the medium of Welsh in primary care settings, and for me, that is entirely inadequate.
Welsh: Nid yw hynny'n ddigonol yn fy marn i, o ran bod yna ddim hawl gan gleifion. Gadewch i ni fod yn onest, canran fach ar hyn o bryd sydd ddim yn y sector annibynnol. Felly, ni fydd gan y rhan fwyaf o gleifion yng Nghymru - o ran y safonau fel maen nhw rŵan - ddim hawl i gael gwasanaeth wyneb-yn-wyneb drwy'r Gymraeg mewn gofal sylfaenol, ac mae hynny, i mi, yn hollol annigonol.
English: But the difficult question for our committee is: would you want to agree to those regulations, and make changes in the future, or because this is something that's an important issue that some people feel should be there, would you recommend going against those particular standards as they stand and look to change them?' That's the question for us as politicians, but it would be helpful to hear your opinion on that.
Welsh: Ond y cwestiwn sydd yn anodd i'n pwyllgor ni yw: a fyddech chi eisiau cytuno i'r rheoliadau fel y maen nhw, a gwneud newidiadau yn y dyfodol, neu oherwydd bod hyn yn rhywbeth eithaf mawr y mae rhai pobl yn dehongli sydd angen bod yna, a fyddech chi'n argymell mynd yn erbyn y rheoliadau fel maen nhw'n sefyll? Dyna'r hyn sydd yn gwestiwn i ni fel gwleidyddion, ond byddai'n help, efallai, i glywed eich barn chi yn hynny o beth.
English: It's a shame, because what we have here is a golden opportunity: an incredible opportunity to be move things forward. 'Mwy na geiriau'/'More than just words' has been a very good policy, but there is no enforcement there. Personally, from my own point of view, I wouldn't vote for in favour of these standards as they currently stand.
Welsh: Mae'n drueni, oherwydd beth sydd gennym ni yn fan hyn ydy cyfle anhygoel mewn ffordd: cyfle euraidd i fedru symud pethau ymlaen. Mae 'Mwy na geiriau' wedi bod yn bolisi arbennig o dda, ond nid oes dim gorfodaeth yn y fan yna. Yn bersonol, fy hunan, ni fyddwn i'n pleidleisio dros y rhain fel y maen nhw.
English: Improvements need to be made.
Welsh: Mae angen gwelliannau.
English: Just a couple of questions to finish. Some of you have had concerns in relation to documentation and the discretion that the health boards have to decide on what documents to produce bilingually or otherwise. Would you like to add to that and explain your concerns?
Welsh: Jest cwestiynau clou i ddod i ben. Mae gan rai ohonoch chi concerns ynglŷn â dogfennau a'r discretions sydd gan y byrddau iechyd i benderfynu pa ddogfennau i'w cael yn ddwyieithog neu beidio. A hoffech chi ychwanegu at hynny ac esbonio beth yw eich pryderon?
English: From my point of view, the philosophy has changed. The active offer places a responsibility on the institution rather than returning once again to putting the pressure on the patient to request that service. So, that's what the active offer is: it's a huge shift, a cultural shift, a change of mindset. We know that patients who speak a minority language aren't going to ask for the service through the medium of that language. They aren't going to express that desire because they feel anxious; they don't want to make a fuss; they don't want to draw attention to themselves, particularly when they are on the spot in that particular place. If one were to ask the organisation, or the institution, to make that decision on the basis of what they think the need is, then I think there is a real risk that those organisations won't provide the documentation that is truly necessary, if you understand what I mean.
Welsh: O'm rhan i, mae'r athroniaeth wedi newid. Mae'r cynnig rhagweithiol yn gosod cyfrifoldeb ar y sefydliad yn hytrach na mynd nôl unwaith eto a phwyso ar y claf i orfod gofyn am y gwasanaeth. Felly, dyna beth ydy'r cynnig rhagweithiol: sifft enfawr, sifft diwylliannol, ffordd o feddwl sydd yn hollol wahanol. Rydym yn gwybod nad yw cleifion sydd yn siarad iaith leiafrifol yn mynd i ofyn am wasanaeth; nid ydynt yn mynd i fynegi y gofyn yna oherwydd maen nhw'n teimlo dan bwysau; nid ydynt eisiau gwneud ffỳs a ffwdan; nid ydynt eisiau dwyn sylw tuag at eu hunain, yn enwedig pan maen nhw yna yn y fan a'r lle. Felly, os byddai rhywun yn gofyn i'r sefydliad, y corff, i wneud y penderfyniad ar sail beth maen nhw'n meddwl ydy'r angen, mae yna beryg, rwy'n meddwl, na fydd rhywun yn cynnig y ddogfennaeth sydd yn wir ei hangen, os liciwch chi, os ydy hynny'n ddealladwy.
English: Yes. Can I just ask, then, is it possible to solve that problem by just asking at the first point of contact with the patient, rather than through the standards? I'm just trying to see what would be the best way forward of solving the problem.
Welsh: Ydy. A allaf jest gofyn, a ydy'n bosib i ddatrys y broblem yna trwy jest gofyn ar y pwynt cyswllt cyntaf gyda chlaf yn lle trwy safonau? Rwy jest yn trio gweld beth yw'r ffordd orau i ddatrys y broblem.
English: In my view, every document that is made available to the service user should be bilingual because that is what provides the choice for the patient. And let's be honest, the documents for patients will be documents that we will have available on the ground already. I think what these standards refer to is the more technical documentation, which is documentation used internally rather than that front-facing documentation.
Welsh: Yn fy marn i, mi ddylai pob dogfen sydd yn cael ei chyflwyno i ddefnyddiwr gwasanaeth fod yn ddwyieithog oherwydd dyna sydd yn rhoi'r dewis iddyn nhw. A gadewch inni fod yn onest, mae dogfennau ar gyfer cleifion yn mynd i fod yn ddogfennau sydd gennym ni ar lawr gwlad beth bynnag yn aml iawn. Rwy'n meddwl beth mae'r safonau yma'n cyfeirio atyn nhw, hwyrach, ydy dogfennau sydd yn fwy technolegol; sydd yn ddogfennaeth sydd yn cael ei defnyddio yn fewnol yn hytrach na dogfennau sydd yn -
English: Which would confuse the patient really. So, we're not talking about posters and general things here, just things that are specific to that patient. Okay. The last thing I'd like to ask is: it's possible to have a standard that looks different in every region in Wales, so, how do the standards work in the south-west - sorry, I should say the north-west; I'm sorry, second language - which may be different to what you see in the south-east, for example? Is that going to be a problem for people to understand what those rights are? It seems to me that it depends where you are in Wales at any moment in time.
Welsh: Yn drysu'r claf, really. Ocê, felly nid ydym yn siarad am bosteri a phethau cyffredinol, jest yn bwrpasol i'r claf. Y peth olaf hoffwn i ofyn yw: mae'n bosib, wrth gwrs, i gael safon sy'n edrych yn wahanol ym mhob rhanbarth o Gymru, felly, sut mae'r safonau'n gweithio yn y de-orllewin yn wahanol i - sori, nid de-orllewin, gogledd-orllewin; sori, ail iaith - yn wahanol i'r de-ddwyrain, er enghraifft? A ydy hwn yn mynd i fod yn broblem i bobl i ddeall beth yw'r hawliau? Achos mae'n ymddangos i fi ei fod yn dibynnu lle ŷch chi yng Nghymru ar unrhyw foment.
English: I think standards should apply across Wales because patients move from place to place in Wales and they should have that same right to the service through the medium of Welsh. Let's stay that they've moved from Bangor, or somewhere else in north Wales, down to south Wales. I do think that there are sufficient numbers of Welsh-speaking staff in place, and I think it's important that right is in place for them if they choose to use it. The main thing is that they have the appropriate clinical care, of course, but this is something that is a right that they should have, and they should be able to request that through the medium of Welsh.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n credu dylai'r safonau fod yn berthnasol ledled Cymru oherwydd mae cleifion yn symud o le i le yng Nghymru. Gallen nhw gael yr hawl i gael gwasanaeth yna yn Gymraeg - . Dywedwch eu bod nhw wedi symud o Fangor, neu'r gogledd, i lawr i'r de, rwy'n credu bod yna ddigon o weithwyr o safbwynt yr iaith Gymraeg. Rwy'n credu ei fod yn bwysig bod yr hawl yna iddyn nhw os ydyn nhw'n dewis. Y prif beth yw eu bod nhw'n cael y gofal clinigol, ond mae hwn yn rhywbeth sydd yn hawl iddyn nhw i ofyn i gael y driniaeth yn y Gymraeg.
English: Can I just come in there?
Welsh: A allaf jest gofyn rhywbeth?
English: Yes, of course. You can do better than me, I think.
Welsh: Ie, wrth gwrs. Rwyt ti'n gallu gwneud yn well na fi, rwy'n credu.
English: In the short term, if there was a standard that stated that everyone has the right to have a clinical consultation through the medium of Welsh - if there was a standard that stated that - it would then be up to the commissioner to interpret that in relation to various authorities across Wales. I would suspect that the commissioner would interpret that for Betsi Cadwaladr, perhaps, in a different way to maybe some of the boards in south Wales. So, do you see that there's a way of doing that? That is, the basic standard would be there, but the commissioner, then - . But if it's not there at all, there's nothing for the commissioner to work with. That's the point, I think, isn't it?
Welsh: Yn y tymor byr, tybed - . Petai yna safon yn dweud bod gan bawb hawl i gael ymgynghoriad clinigol drwy'r Gymraeg - os oedd yna safon yn dweud hynny - byddai e wedyn fyny i'r comisiynydd i ddehongli'r safon i wahanol awdurdodau ar draws Cymru. Buaswn i'n tybio byddai'r comisiynydd yn ei dehongli i fwrdd iechyd Betsi Cadwaladr mewn ffordd wahanol i rai o'r byrddau yn y de. Felly, a ydych chi'n gweld bod yna ffordd o wneud hynny? Hynny yw, mi fyddai'r safon gyffredinol yna, ond mi fyddai'r comisiynydd wedyn - . Ond heb ei fod yna o gwbl, nid oes dim byd i'r comisiynydd weithio efo fo. Dyna'r pwynt, rwy'n meddwl.
English: Well, yes, that's half the point, yes, but the other half is: is this too complex for people to understand what their rights are? Because it depends where they are.
Welsh: Ie, wel, dyna hanner y pwynt, ond yr hanner arall yw: a ydy hwn yn creu cymhlethdod i bobl i ddeall beth yw eu hawliau nhw? Achos mae'n dibynnu ar le maen nhw.
English: I think it provides clarity, to be honest with you. We must bear in my mind that the commissioner will regularly monitor these issues, and again, it's an opportunity to build and to assist and promote those areas where they perhaps aren't reaching the standard in this year, but, perhaps in two years' time, there will be plans in place where they will be able to deliver that standard, and then we will be moving forward in Wales so that there will be fewer and fewer differences geographically. We have seen that happening in the south-east already, and I see that as being encouraging, if truth be told.
Welsh: Rwy'n teimlo ei fod e'n ei gwneud hi'n fwy clir, i fod yn onest efo chi. Ydw. Ac mae'n rhaid inni gofio bod y comisiynydd yn mynd i fonitro yn rheolaidd, ac felly, eto, mae cyfle i adeiladu a chynorthwyo a hybu ardaloedd lle nad ydyn nhw'n cyrraedd y safon yn y flwyddyn yma, ond, hwyrach ymhen dwy flynedd, mi fydd yna gynlluniau ar waith lle byddan nhw'n gallu ei chyrraedd hi, ac fel y bydd hi'n symud felly yng Nghymru felly y bydd yna llai a llai o wahaniaethau, gobeithio. Rydym ni wedi gweld hyn yn digwydd yn y de-ddwyrain yn barod, ac rwy'n gweld hynny'n galonogol, a dweud y gwir.
English: Okay, if there are no further questions, then we'll bring the session to an end. Thank you very much for coming in to give evidence, and to Dr Emyr Humphreys for coming in at short notice also. Thank you for that. I hope that you will follow the developments in relation to the standards. Thank you very much.
Welsh: Ocê, os nad oes cwestiynau eraill, rydym ni'n dirwyn y sesiwn yma yn benodol i ben. Ond diolch yn fawr iawn i chi oll am ddod i mewn a rhoi tystiolaeth, ac i Dr Emyr Humphreys yn fyr rybudd hefyd. Felly, diolch yn fawr iawn am hynny. Gobeithio y byddwch chi'n dilyn yr hyn sydd yn digwydd gyda'r rheoliadau. Diolch.
English: We are going to take a break - . No, sorry. I'm just going to look at the written responses before we take a break. So, there are written responses to be noted from Cymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg, Meddwl.org, the Royal College of General Practitioners. Are there any comments on the written responses from Members? No.
Welsh: Rŷm ni'n mynd i gael seibiant o - . O, sori. Rwyf i jest yn mynd i wneud ymatebion ysgrifenedig cyn inni gael seibiant - sori. Felly, mae ymatebion ysgrifenedig i'w nodi gan Gymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg, Meddwl.org, Coleg Brenhinol yr Ymarferwyr Cyffredinol. A oes unrhyw sylwadau ar y rhai ysgrifenedig gan Aelodau ar hyn o bryd? Na.
English: And then, item 5, a motion under Standing Order 17.42 to resolve to exclude the public from the remainder of the meeting. Is everyone happy? Thank you very much.
Welsh: Ac wedyn, eitem 5, cynnig o dan Reol Sefydlog 17.42 i wahardd y cyhoedd o weddill y cyfarfod. A ydy pawb yn hapus gyda hynny? Diolch.
English: The first item on our agenda this afternoon is questions to the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Services, and the first question, David Melding.
Welsh: Yr eitem gyntaf ar ein hagenda ni'r prynhawn yma yw'r cwestiynau i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Iechyd a Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol, a'r cwestiwn cyntaf, David Melding.
English: Yes. Health boards in Wales are responsible for providing appropriate rheumatology services for their population. These services are provided in line with the directive for arthritis and chronic musculoskeletal conditions, which is currently being refreshed.
Welsh: Gwnaf. Mae byrddau iechyd yng Nghymru yn gyfrifol am ddarparu gwasanaethau rhewmatoleg priodol ar gyfer eu poblogaeth. Darperir y gwasanaethau hyn yn unol â'r gyfarwyddeb ar gyfer arthritis a chyflyrau cyhyrysgerbydol cronig, sy'n cael ei diweddaru ar hyn o bryd.
English: I thank the Cabinet Secretary for that answer. You will know that there's long been a call for specialist paediatric rheumatology services in the region. And, indeed, Wales is the only nation in the UK at the moment that doesn't have a specialist service for paediatric rheumatology. You will also further know that the Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee is meeting on 27 March to discuss this issue and the very extensive calls there have been for some form of national centre that can cover most of Wales, perhaps based in Cardiff. I do hope you'll be able to convey to them the cross-party support this call has had in the Assembly, and that this call should be considered with real urgency by WHSSC when they meet later in this month.
Welsh: Diolch i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet am ei ateb. Fe fyddwch yn gwybod bod galw wedi bod ers tro am wasanaethau rhewmatoleg pediatrig arbenigol yn y rhanbarth. Ac yn wir, Cymru yw'r unig wlad yn y DU ar hyn o bryd nad oes ganddi wasanaeth arbenigol ar gyfer rhewmatoleg pediatrig. Fe fyddwch hefyd yn gwybod y bydd Pwyllgor Gwasanaethau Iechyd Arbenigol Cymru yn cyfarfod ar 27 Mawrth i drafod y mater hwn a'r galwadau helaeth a fu am ryw fath o ganolfan genedlaethol ar gyfer y rhan helaeth o Gymru, wedi'i lleoli yng Nghaerdydd o bosibl. Rwy'n gobeithio y gallwch gyfleu iddynt y gefnogaeth drawsbleidiol y mae'r alwad hon wedi'i chael yn y Cynulliad, ac y dylai Pwyllgor Gwasanaethau Iechyd Arbenigol Cymru ystyried yr alwad fel mater o frys pan fyddant yn cyfarfod yn ddiweddarach y mis hwn.
English: Yes, I recognise the Member's consistent interest in the issue, including the debate that he helped to lead in July of last year. I indicated at that time that I was aware that there was a review being undertaken by WHSSC, as well as work on refreshing the directive. I said at the time that I'll take proper account of what the WHSSC review highlights, and I'm happy to repeat that assurance again, but also that the work that is being undertaken on the directive is a genuine example of working - the Government, the health service, and the third sector, and the individual as well. So, we're talking to service users about the directive, and there are a range of different workshops involving the third sector as well. So, I hope that gives some reassurance that we are genuinely looking to both improve on where we are, to look at the evidence, but also to do so in a way that is genuinely co-productive with the individual citizen as well.
Welsh: Ydw, rwy'n cydnabod diddordeb cyson yr Aelod yn y mater, gan gynnwys y ddadl a gynorthwyodd i'w harwain ym mis Gorffennaf y llynedd. Dywedais ar y pryd fy mod yn ymwybodol fod Pwyllgor Gwasanaethau Iechyd Arbenigol Cymru yn cynnal adolygiad, yn ogystal â gwneud gwaith ar ddiweddaru'r gyfarwyddeb. Dywedais ar y pryd y byddaf yn rhoi ystyriaeth briodol i'r hyn a nodir yn adolygiad Pwyllgor Gwasanaethau Iechyd Arbenigol Cymru, ac rwy'n fwy na pharod i ailadrodd y sicrwydd hwnnw, ond hefyd fod y gwaith sy'n mynd rhagddo ar y gyfarwyddeb yn enghraifft wirioneddol o weithio - y Llywodraeth, y gwasanaeth iechyd, a'r trydydd sector, a'r unigolyn hefyd. Felly, rydym yn siarad â defnyddwyr y gwasanaethau ynglŷn â'r gyfarwyddeb, ac mae amrywiaeth o wahanol weithdai yn cynnwys y trydydd sector hefyd. Gobeithio, felly, fod hynny'n rhoi rhywfaint o sicrwydd ein bod o ddifrif yn awyddus i wella, i edrych ar y dystiolaeth, ond hefyd i wneud hynny mewn ffordd sy'n wirioneddol gydgynhyrchiol gyda'r dinesydd unigol.
English: I support David Melding's question, but I was also very concerned to hear from Arthritis Care that the only specialist paediatric rheumatoid arthritis specialist in Wales - who is my constituent, Jeremy Camilleri, who works at the University Hospital of Wales - is actually due to retire within the next two years. I have actually met him to discuss this. And it will obviously be quite difficult to replace him, I think. So, is the Cabinet Secretary aware of any plans to plan for his successor?
Welsh: Rwy'n cefnogi cwestiwn David Melding, ond roeddwn hefyd yn bryderus iawn wrth glywed gan Gofal Arthritis y bydd yr unig arbenigwr ar arthritis gwynegol pediatrig yng Nghymru - un o fy etholwyr, Jeremy Camilleri, sy'n gweithio yn Ysbyty Athrofaol Cymru - yn ymddeol o fewn y ddwy flynedd nesaf. Rwyf wedi cyfarfod ag ef i drafod hyn. Ac yn amlwg, bydd yn eithaf anodd dod o hyd i rywun i gymryd ei le, yn fy marn i. Felly, a yw Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn ymwybodol o unrhyw gynlluniau i gynllunio ar gyfer ei olynydd?
English: Yes, that's part of the work that health boards need to undertake, and having a refreshed directive on the care they need to provide is part of that, to understand the care they need to provide and the workforce that will be needed to do that. And I'm also aware of Mr Camilleri's pending retirement in the not-too-distant future. So, there is some urgency about this matter and it can't be continually kicked down the road, but that's why the work that is ongoing is so important. And also what's important is to involve individual people, involved and engaged in the services, both staff and citizens, to understand what an appropriate answer is for the future.
Welsh: Ydy, mae hynny'n rhan o'r gwaith y mae angen i fyrddau iechyd ei wneud, ac mae sicrhau cyfarwyddeb ddiwygiedig ar y gofal y mae angen iddynt ei ddarparu yn rhan o hynny, er mwyn deall y gofal y mae angen iddynt ei ddarparu a'r gweithlu y bydd ei angen i wneud hynny. Ac rwyf hefyd yn ymwybodol y bydd Mr Camilleri yn ymddeol yn y dyfodol cymharol agos. Felly, ceir rhywfaint o frys ynglŷn â'r mater hwn ac ni ellir parhau i'w ohirio, ond dyna pam y mae'r gwaith sy'n mynd rhagddo mor bwysig. Ac mae hefyd yn bwysig cynnwys unigolion, sy'n gysylltiedig â'r gwasanaethau ac yn ymwneud â hwy, yn staff a dinasyddion, i ddeall beth sy'n ateb priodol ar gyfer y dyfodol.
English: Early inflammatory arthritis clinics are one method of improving access to treatment for rheumatoid arthritis sufferers. What steps are you taking to facilitate the greater provision of these clinics?
Welsh: Mae clinigau arthritis llidiol cynnar yn un dull o wella mynediad at driniaeth ar gyfer pobl sy'n dioddef o arthritis gwynegol. Pa gamau rydych yn eu cymryd i hwyluso gwell darpariaeth o'r clinigau hyn?
English: Well, as I've indicated, this is an area of service review that's being undertaken. So, the WHSSC review will help us to understand, as well as the broader responsibilities of health boards that I indicated in the first part of my original answer to the question. So, it is about understanding what we need, where responsibility lies, and then seeing that provision actually take place. So, I'm confident that this is an issue that the health service is taking seriously, and it ought to come up with a real and material plan for improvement. Because I recognise, as do other Members, this is an area for further improvement to be made.
Welsh: Wel, fel y dywedais, mae hwn yn faes o'r adolygiad gwasanaeth sy'n mynd rhagddo. Felly, bydd adolygiad Pwyllgor Gwasanaethau Iechyd Arbenigol Cymru yn ein cynorthwyo i ddeall, yn ogystal â chyfrifoldebau mwy cyffredinol y byrddau iechyd a nodais yn rhan gyntaf fy ateb gwreiddiol i'r cwestiwn. Felly, mae hyn yn ymwneud â deall beth sydd arnom ei angen, pwy sy'n gyfrifol, ac yna sicrhau bod y ddarpariaeth honno'n digwydd. Felly, rwy'n hyderus fod y gwasanaeth iechyd yn ystyried y mater hwn o ddifrif, a dylai gynhyrchu cynllun real a pherthnasol ar gyfer gwella. Oherwydd rwy'n cydnabod, fel Aelodau eraill, fod hwn yn faes y gellir ei wella.
English: Thank you for the question. Tackling sepsis remains a top patient safety priority in Wales, with work continuing through the 1000 Lives improvement programme, which I know the Member will be aware of. That is to raise awareness and ensure early detection and treatment of patients with sepsis. This work includes peer review, as well as improving practice outside of acute hospital settings.
Welsh: Diolch am eich cwestiwn. Mae mynd i'r afael â sepsis yn parhau i fod yn flaenoriaeth o ran diogelwch cleifion yng Nghymru, gyda'r gwaith yn mynd rhagddo drwy raglen wella 1000 o Fywydau, y gwn y bydd yr Aelod yn ymwybodol ohoni. Ei nod yw codi ymwybyddiaeth a sicrhau bod sepsis yn cael ei ganfod yn gynnar a bod cleifion â sepsis yn cael eu trin yn gynnar. Mae'r gwaith hwn yn cynnwys adolygu gan gymheiriaid, yn ogystal â gwella arferion y tu allan i ysbytai acíwt.