techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, that will be part of the consideration that is given to this matter by the Minister over the ensuing weeks. We want, of course, to ensure that we have a scheme that has a permanent impact on animal welfare standards in order to, of course, ensure that we improve the standards of animal welfare in Wales.
Welsh: Wel, bydd hynny'n rhan o'r ystyriaeth sydd yn cael ei rhoi i'r mater hwn gan y Gweinidog dros yr wythnosau nesaf. Rydym ni'n moyn, wrth gwrs, sicrhau cynllun sydd yn cael impact parhaol ar safonau lles anifeiliaid er mwyn, wrth gwrs, sicrhau ein bod ni'n gwella safonau iechyd a lles anifeiliaid yma yng Nghymru.
English: What concerns me on this issue is that Wales could become a haven for circuses using wild animals. Scotland has banned their use, Westminster is considering a ban, but Wales is falling behind in this area despite the fact that the UK leader of your party is in favour of a ban. So, what exactly is holding you back, and wasn't it a mistake to confuse two things in this consultation? Isn't it a simple matter of introducing a ban on wild animals in circuses, and then looking at what needs to be done in terms of mobile exhibits in rural areas and so on?
Welsh: Yr hyn sy'n fy mhoeni i efo hwn ydy y gallai Cymru droi yn hafan ar gyfer syrcasau sy'n defnyddio anifeiliaid gwyllt. Mae'r Alban wedi gwahardd, mae San Steffan efallai yn mynd i wahardd, ond mae Cymru ar ei hôl hi yn y fan hyn, er gwaethaf y ffaith bod arweinydd Prydeinig eich plaid chi o blaid gwaharddiad. Felly, beth yn union sydd yn eich dal chi nôl, ac onid camgymeriad oedd cymysgu dau beth yn yr ymgynghoriad? Onid yw hi'n fater syml o ddod â gwaharddiad ar anifeiliaid gwyllt mewn syrcasau i mewn, ac wedyn edrych ar beth sydd angen ei wneud o ran yr arddangosfeydd mewn ardaloedd gwledig ac yn y blaen?
English: No. I believe that what has been done in the consultation is correct, and we don't wish to be a haven. Can I just say that to the Member? We don't want to be a haven where wild animals can come to Wales while there is a ban in the other nations of the United Kingdom, and even in the Republic of Ireland. So, that is not the intention. What we're considering now is the best way forward in order to ensure the welfare of these animals.
Welsh: Na. Rwy'n credu bod beth sydd wedi cael ei wneud yn yr ymgynghoriad yn iawn, ac wrth gwrs, rydym ni'n moyn symud ymlaen. Nid ydym ni ddim yn moyn bod yn hafan. A gaf i jest ddweud hynny wrth yr Aelod? Nid ydym ni'n moyn bod yn hafan lle mae anifeiliaid gwyllt yn gallu dod i Gymru er bod yna waharddiad yng ngwledydd eraill y Deyrnas Unedig, a hyd yn oed Gweriniaeth Iwerddon. Felly, nid hynny yw'r bwriad. Beth rydym ni'n ei ystyried nawr yw beth yw'r ffordd orau ymlaen er mwyn sicrhau lles yr anifeiliaid hyn.
English: Yes. Our priorities for the NHS in Monmouthshire are the same as they are for the whole of Wales. We'll continue to protect investment in the health service and deliver the range of commitments set out in 'Taking Wales Forward'.
Welsh: Gwnaf. Mae ein blaenoriaethau ar gyfer y GIG yn Sir Fynwy yr un fath ag y maen nhw ar gyfer Cymru gyfan. Byddwn yn parhau i ddiogelu buddsoddiad yn y gwasanaeth iechyd a chyflawni'r ystod o ymrwymiadau a nodir yn 'Symud Cymru Ymlaen'.
English: First Minister, if I can I ask you about dementia care, there's deep concern in and around Chepstow at the planned closure of the purpose-built dementia ward at Chepstow Community Hospital and the relocation of services to St Woolos Hospital in Newport. Aneurin Bevan local health board have cited staff shortages as one of the reasons for this. This is at consultation phase at the moment. If this goes ahead, it will represent the loss of Monmouthshire's entire in-patient dementia provision, and a combined reduction in provision in Newport and Monmouthshire from 29 to 14 beds. Will you urge the health board to reconsider these flawed plans to protect Chepstow hospital's valuable resources and to find a more sustainable solution to the problem the health board is currently facing?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, os gallaf eich holi am ofal dementia, ceir pryder mawr yng Nghas-gwent a'r cyffiniau ynghylch y bwriad i gau'r ward dementia bwrpasol yn Ysbyty Cymuned Cas-gwent ac adleoli gwasanaethau i Ysbyty Gwynllyw yng Nghasnewydd. Mae bwrdd iechyd lleol Aneurin Bevan wedi nodi prinder staff fel un o'r rhesymau am hyn. Mae hyn ar y cam ymgynghori ar hyn o bryd. Os bydd hyn yn digwydd, bydd yn golygu colli ddarpariaeth gyfan dementia cleifion mewnol Sir Fynwy, a gostyngiad cyfunol i'r ddarpariaeth yng Nghasnewydd a Sir Fynwy o 29 i 14 o welyau. A wnewch chi annog y bwrdd iechyd i ailystyried y cynlluniau diffygiol hyn i ddiogelu adnoddau gwerthfawr ysbyty Cas-gwent ac i ddod o hyd i ateb mwy cynaliadwy i'r broblem y mae'r bwrdd iechyd yn ei hwynebu ar hyn o bryd?
English: I am aware of the changes that have been made. I am also aware that the health board has undertaken a 12-week public consultation. That's still open, and I'd encourage all views to be fed into that consultation. I'm also aware that the health board has discussed options for the future development of Chepstow Community Hospital and has established a working group to develop proposals for the future of the excellent local facilities, and I further understand that the health board is expecting an initial report to be presented in the spring.
Welsh: Rwy'n ymwybodol o'r newidiadau sydd wedi eu gwneud. Rwyf hefyd yn ymwybodol bod y bwrdd iechyd wedi cynnal ymgynghoriad cyhoeddus dros gyfnod o 12 wythnos. Mae hwnnw'n dal yn agored, a byddwn yn annog i bob safbwynt gael ei gyfrannu i'r ymgynghoriad hwnnw. Rwyf hefyd yn ymwybodol bod y Bwrdd Iechyd wedi trafod dewisiadau ar gyfer datblygu Ysbyty Cymuned Cas-gwent yn y dyfodol ac wedi sefydlu gweithgor i ddatblygu cynigion ar gyfer dyfodol y cyfleusterau lleol ardderchog, ac rwyf hefyd yn deall bod y bwrdd iechyd yn disgwyl i adroddiad cychwynnol gael ei gyflwyno yn y gwanwyn.
English: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. The First Minister will agree with me that in order to secure value for money in public contracts, it is desirable that there should be a reasonable spread of credible bidders. It wasn't entirely clear to me from the answer that the finance Secretary gave to Adam Price earlier what the legal impact is going to be of the collapse of Carillion in relation to Abellio's bid. There are only three bidders in the contest at the moment. If Abellio is removed from it, that means, of course, that there are only two bids. What are the implications of this for that general principle of securing value for money by having credible competition for these big contracts? This is a contract that affects not just the Wales and borders rail franchise, but also the electrification of the Valleys lines as part of the metro project, and this contract will be let for 15 years. So, it has long-term consequences. I wonder if the First Minister could give us a little more clarification on this point.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. Bydd y Prif Weinidog yn cytuno â mi ei bod yn ddymunol, er mwyn sicrhau gwerth am arian mewn contractau cyhoeddus, y dylai fod amrywiaeth resymol o ymgeiswyr credadwy. Nid oedd yn gwbl eglur i mi o'r ateb a roddodd yr Ysgrifennydd dros gyllid i Adam Price yn gynharach beth fydd effaith cyfreithiol methiant Carillion o ran cynnig Abellio. Dim ond tri o gynigwyr sydd yn yr ornest ar hyn o bryd. Os caiff Abellio ei dynnu ohoni, mae hynny'n golygu, wrth gwrs, mai dim ond dau gais sydd gennym. Beth yw goblygiadau hyn i'r egwyddor gyffredinol honno o sicrhau gwerth am arian trwy gael cystadleuaeth gredadwy am y contractau mawr hyn? Mae hwn yn gontract sy'n effeithio nid yn unig ar fasnachfraint rheilffyrdd Cymru a'r gororau, ond hefyd ar drydaneiddio rheilffyrdd y Cymoedd yn rhan o'r prosiect metro, a bydd y contract hwn yn cael ei osod am 15 mlynedd. Felly, mae iddo ganlyniadau hirdymor. Tybed a allai'r Prif Weinidog roi ychydig mwy o eglurhad i ni ar y pwynt hwn.
English: It's no secret that our preferred scenario would have been to be able to run Welsh railways via a not-for-profit, arm's-length, Welsh Government-owned business, but we were prevented from doing that by the Conservative Government in London. They're happy to let Scotland do it, but as far as Wales is concerned, they're not happy to let - [ Interruption. ] He's groaning away, the leader of the opposition, again, not supporting this, of course - but the reality is that we were prevented from doing that. But that, nevertheless, was our preferred option. We were stopped from doing it. He asked the question about Abellio. Transport for Wales has the appropriate expertise in place to deal with this. We are in discussions with Abellio Rail Cymru about the complex situation - and it is complex - that arises from the announcement. Whilst the difficulties encountered by part of one of the consortium bidders is disappointing, it is important we remain focused on the evaluation to keep procurement on track. I can say that Transport for Wales continue to evaluate the competitive bids received whilst ensuring equality of treatment of the bidders in line with procurement law.
Welsh: Nid yw'n gyfrinach mai'r sefyllfa ddelfrydol o'n safbwynt ni fyddai wedi bod gallu rhedeg rheilffyrdd Cymru trwy fusnes dielw, hyd braich a fyddai'n eiddo i Lywodraeth Cymru, ond fe'n rhwystrwyd rhag gwneud hynny gan y Llywodraeth Geidwadol yn Llundain. Maen nhw'n hapus i ganiatáu i'r Alban wneud hynny, ond cyn belled ag y mae Cymru yn y cwestiwn, dydyn nhw ddim yn hapus i ganiatáu - [ Torri ar draws. ] Mae'n ochneidio yn ddi-baid, arweinydd yr wrthblaid, unwaith eto, ddim yn cefnogi hyn, wrth gwrs - ond y gwir yw ein bod ni wedi ein rhwystro rhag gwneud hynny. Ond, serch hynny, dyna oedd y dewis a ffafriwyd. Fe'n rhwystrwyd rhag gwneud hynny. Gofynnodd y cwestiwn am Abellio. Mae gan Trafnidiaeth Cymru yr arbenigedd priodol ar gael i ymdrin â hyn. Rydym ni mewn trafodaethau gydag Abellio Rail Cymru am y sefyllfa gymhleth - ac mae'n gymhleth - sy'n deillio o'r cyhoeddiad. Er bod yr anawsterau a gafwyd gan ran o un o'r cynigwyr consortiwm yn siomedig, mae'n bwysig ein bod ni'n parhau i ganolbwyntio ar y gwerthusiad i gadw caffael ar y trywydd iawn. Gallaf ddweud bod Trafnidiaeth Cymru yn parhau i werthuso'r cynigion cystadleuol a dderbyniwyd a sicrhau triniaeth gyfartal i'r cynigwyr yn unol â chyfraith caffael.
English: Well, with what's happened this week, whilst it couldn't have been predicted with confidence, there was clearly a high possibility that Carillion was going to get into difficulties from which it couldn't extricate itself. After all, we had the first profit warning in July. In September, the shares in Carillion fell by 60 per cent in two days. Three weeks after that, there was another profits warning. On 17 November, Carillion warned that it was on course to breach its banking covenants, which must have gone to the heart of the credibility of that part of Abellio's bid, and considering they were the preferred construction partner, this obviously had immense implications for the credibility of that bid. Was there any action taken by Transport for Wales, or any involvement by Welsh Government in the period after July to try to protect the bidding process against the possibility of the collapse of Abellio's bid? Because, if Abellio had been able to obtain some other construction partner, or to keep one in the wings in the meantime, that might have been able to save this element of the bidding process.
Welsh: Wel, gyda'r hyn sydd wedi digwydd yr wythnos hon, er na ellid bod wedi ei ragweld yn hyderus, roedd yn amlwg bod posibilrwydd uchel bod Carillion yn mynd i fynd i drafferthion na allai gael ei hun allan ohonynt. Wedi'r cyfan, cawsom ni'r rhybudd elw cyntaf ym mis Gorffennaf. Ym mis Medi, gostyngodd y cyfranddaliadau yn Carillion 60 y cant mewn dau ddiwrnod. Dair wythnos wedi hynny, roedd rhybudd elw arall. Ar 17 Tachwedd, rhybuddiodd Carillion ei fod yn mynd i fynd yn groes i'w gyfamodau bancio, ac mae'n rhaid bod hynny wedi mynd i galon hygrededd y rhan honno o gynnig Abellio, ac o ystyried mai nhw oedd y partner adeiladu a ffafriwyd, roedd hyn yn amlwg yn arwain at oblygiadau aruthrol i hygrededd y cynnig hwnnw. A gymerwyd unrhyw gamau gan Trafnidiaeth Cymru, neu unrhyw gyfranogiad gan Lywodraeth Cymru yn y cyfnod ar ôl mis Gorffennaf i geisio diogelu'r broses ymgeisio rhag y posibilrwydd o fethiant cynnig Abellio? Oherwydd, pe byddai Abellio wedi gallu cael gafael ar ryw bartner adeiladu eraill, neu gadw un wrth gefn yn y cyfamser, efallai y byddai hynny wedi gallu achub yr elfen hon o'r broses ymgeisio.
English: I think there are dangers in Transport for Wales engaging in that way with a bidder. There has to be distance between Transport for Wales and the bidders themselves. It is a matter for Abellio Rail Cymru to put themselves in a situation where they are confident that their bid can move forward, and discussions will continue along those lines in terms of how that can be done. We know there was a profit warning in July. Hindsight is a wonderful thing, but I don't think anybody, let alone the UK Government, could have known the scale of the problems within Carillion. Clearly, they were unprepared, and I think that many would have found themselves in that situation. I think the feeling might have been that Carillion was too big to fail, but, unfortunately, we know that isn't the case. Nevertheless, we are talking about a part of one of the consortium bidders. It's a question now to see whether that part can be replaced.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu bod peryglon o ran Trafnidiaeth Cymru yn ymgysylltu yn y modd hwnnw gyda chynigiwr. Mae'n rhaid cael pellter rhwng Trafnidiaeth Cymru a'r cynigwyr eu hunain. Mater i Abellio Rail Cymru yw rhoi eu hunain mewn sefyllfa lle maen nhw'n hyderus y gall eu cynnig symud ymlaen, a bydd y trafodaethau yn parhau ar y sail honno o ran sut y gellir gwneud hynny. Rydym ni'n gwybod bod rhybudd elw ym mis Gorffennaf. Mae'r gallu i edrych yn ôl yn beth gwych, ond nid wyf i'n credu y gallai neb, heb sôn am Lywodraeth y DU, fod wedi bod yn ymwybodol o faint y problemau o fewn Carillion. Yn amlwg, nid oeddent yn barod, ac rwy'n credu y byddai llawer wedi canfod eu hunain yn y sefyllfa honno. Rwy'n credu efallai mai'r teimlad oedd bod Carillion yn rhy fawr i fethu, ond, yn anffodus, rydym ni'n gwybod nad yw hynny'n wir. Serch hynny, rydym ni'n sôn am ran o un o'r cynigwyr consortiwm. Mae'n fater nawr o weld a ellir llenwi'r rhan honno.
English: Well, it's clear that the answer to my question is that both the Government and Transport for Wales sat on their hands during that period, but I'll leave that there. Does the First Minister share my amusement that Philip Green, the chairman of Carillion since 2014, was an adviser on corporate responsibility to David Cameron and Theresa May as Prime Minister, and that the previous chief executive of Carillion, Richard Howson, was allowed to leave the company a few months ago with a 12-month payoff of £660,000 in salary and £28,000 in benefits whilst the company has been making small firms wait for up to 120 days for payment on their contracts? The Welsh Government has a policy on social responsibility with the companies that are contracting with it. Surely prompt payment is one of the essential elements in that. The Welsh Government has a policy of paying all invoices on time, and when the Welsh Government receives bids from firms for large contracts that it's going to award, or agencies like Transport for Wales, what protection is going to be given to small firms who are now left, as in this instance, probably, high and dry, and lots of them will not be paid? That could be pivotal in the question of whether small businesses themselves, as a ricochet effect from the collapse of Carillion, also go out of business.
Welsh: Wel, mae'n amlwg mai'r ateb i fy nghwestiwn yw bod y Llywodraeth a Thrafnidiaeth Cymru wedi eistedd ar eu dwylo yn ystod y cyfnod hwnnw, ond byddaf yn ei gadael hi yn y fan yna. A yw'r Prif Weinidog yn rhannu fy nifyrrwch bod Philip Green, Cadeirydd Carillion ers 2014, yn gynghorydd ar gyfrifoldeb corfforaethol i David Cameron a Theresa May fel Prif Weinidog, ac y caniatawyd i Brif Weithredwr blaenorol Carillion, Richard Howson, adael y cwmni ychydig fisoedd yn ôl gyda chytundeb 12 mis o £660,000 mewn cyflog a £28,000 mewn budd-daliadau tra bod y cwmni wedi bod yn gwneud i gwmnïau bach aros hyd at 120 diwrnod am daliad ar eu contractau? Mae gan Lywodraeth Cymru bolisi ar gyfrifoldeb cymdeithasol gyda'r cwmnïau sy'n contractio â hi. Does bosib bod talu'n brydlon yn un o'r elfennau hanfodol yn hynny. Mae gan Lywodraeth Cymru bolisi o dalu pob anfoneb yn brydlon, a phan fydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn derbyn ceisiadau gan fusnesau ar gyfer contractau mawr y mae'n mynd i'w dyfarnu, neu asiantaethau fel Trafnidiaeth Cymru, pa ddiogelwch sy'n mynd i gael ei roi i gwmnïau bach sydd wedi eu gadael nawr, fel yn yr achos hwn, mae'n debyg, ar y clwt, a bydd llawer ohonyn nhw na fyddant yn cael eu talu? Gallai hynny fod yn hollbwysig o ran y cwestiwn o ba un a allai busnesau bach eu hunain, fel sgil-effaith o fethiant Carillion, fynd allan o fusnes hefyd.
English: Cash flow is all to a small business. It's not clear yet what the extent of Carillion's collapse will be on small businesses in Wales. I know that the Cabinet Secretary is looking to obtain information on that, but of course what we can't do is govern the way in which large businesses fund themselves. There are many issues there that the leader of UKIP has rightly highlighted - moral issues. It seems to me that quite often, in some businesses - not all, of course, and not even most - bonus payments are made regardless of performance, and also that people are paid off with substantial sums of money in order to go away even where performance is well below the standard expected. There are issues there. There are issues in terms of how empowered shareholders are. They hold the board to account, of course, but in terms of knowledge and expertise, it's not quite as easy as that. I think there are, as a result of what we've seen from Carillion, lessons to be learned in terms of looking again at company law and the way in which companies govern themselves. Is there sufficient governance in larger companies to ensure that this kind of situation doesn't happen? We've seen from Carillion that the answer to that is 'no'.
Welsh: Llif arian yw popeth i fusnes bach. Nid yw'n eglur eto beth fydd effaith methiant Carillion ar fusnesau bach yng Nghymru. Gwn fod Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn ceisio cael gafael ar wybodaeth am hynny, ond yr hyn na allwn ei wneud, wrth gwrs, yw rheoli'r ffordd y mae busnesau mawr yn ariannu eu hunain. Ceir llawer o faterion yn y fan yna y mae arweinydd UKIP wedi eu hamlygu'n a hynny'n briodol - materion moesol. Mae'n ymddangos i mi yn aml iawn, mewn rhai busnesau - nid pob un, wrth gwrs, ac nid y mwyafrif hyd yn oed - bod taliadau bonws yn cael eu gwneud beth bynnag fo'r perfformiad, a hefyd bod pobl yn derbyn taliadau ymadael sy'n symiau sylweddol o arian er mwyn mynd i ffwrdd hyd yn oed pan fo perfformiad yn llawer is na'r safon a ddisgwylir. Mae problemau yn hynny o beth. Ceir problemau o ran faint rym sydd gan cyfranddalwyr. Maen nhw'n dwyn y bwrdd i gyfrif, wrth gwrs, ond o ran gwybodaeth ac arbenigedd, nid yw mor hawdd â hynny. Rwy'n credu, o ganlyniad i'r hyn yr ydym ni wedi ei weld gan Carillion, bod gwersi i'w dysgu o ran edrych unwaith eto ar gyfraith cwmnïau a'r ffordd y mae cwmnïau yn llywodraethu eu hunain. A oes llywodraethu digonol mewn cwmnïau mawr i sicrhau nad yw'r math yma o sefyllfa yn digwydd? Rydym ni wedi gweld drwy Carillion mai'r ateb i hynny yw 'nac oes'.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. First Minister, today's independent report on health and social care highlights the importance of staff well-being and says that there should be a sharp focus on staff engagement and well-being. Now, all political parties regularly praise NHS staff, and that's quite right. It's well deserved, because without them the NHS would be nothing. Do you think enough is being done to support the well-being of NHS staff?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, mae adroddiad annibynnol heddiw ar iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol yn amlygu pwysigrwydd llesiant staff ac yn dweud y dylai fod pwyslais pendant ar ymgysylltiad a llesiant staff. Nawr, mae pob plaid wleidyddol yn canmol staff y GIG yn rheolaidd, ac mae hynny'n gwbl briodol. Mae'n haeddiannol, oherwydd hebddyn nhw ni fyddai'r GIG yn ddim. A ydych chi'n meddwl bod digon yn cael ei wneud i gynorthwyo llesiant staff y GIG?
English: These are matters primarily for the local health boards, but, again, I join with the leader of Plaid Cymru in offering a tribute to that incredibly hard work that's been done by members of staff. I know that the director of health and social services has been around the different accident and emergency departments around Wales, listening to their experiences. We know the situation is easing compared to what it was a few weeks ago, but, yes, we'd encourage local health boards, of course, to make sure that there are the right mechanisms in place to ensure that staff feel supported beyond the words that we as politicians express.
Welsh: Materion i'r byrddau iechyd lleol yw'r rhain yn bennaf, ond, unwaith eto, ymunaf ag arweinydd Plaid Cymru i gynnig teyrnged i'r gwaith anhygoel o galed hwnnw a wneir gan aelodau staff. Gwn fod y cyfarwyddwr iechyd a gwasanaethau cymdeithasol wedi bod o gwmpas y gwahanol adrannau damweiniau ac achosion brys ledled Cymru, yn gwrando ar eu profiadau. Rydym ni'n gwybod bod y sefyllfa'n gwella o'i chymharu â sut yr oedd ychydig wythnosau yn ôl, ond, byddem, byddem ni'n annog byrddau iechyd lleol, wrth gwrs, i wneud yn siŵr bod y dulliau cywir ar waith i sicrhau bod staff yn teimlo eu bod yn cael eu cynorthwyo y tu hwnt i'r geiriau yr ydym ni'n eu mynegi fel gwleidyddion.
English: First Minister, in recent weeks disclosures have been made to me by workers in our NHS about serious problems with staff morale and well-being. People serving on the front line claim to be at breaking point as a result of some of the pressures that are being put upon them. Now, I've only had permission to refer to one of these disclosures so far, but the person's asked me specifically to raise it with you in Government. First Minister, a serious allegation is being made that, at times of high demand, ambulance service prioritisation is putting people at risk. In the past few weeks, it's alleged that patients categorised as suitable for a 20-minute response have had to wait up to six hours for an ambulance. I'm told that these include patients who have had a stroke, heart attacks and breathing problems. The person revealing this information to me is currently off sick with stress and cannot speak about their job without breaking down into tears. First Minister, how can this situation be defended, and what are you going to do about it?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, gwnaed datgeliadau i mi yn ystod yr wythnosau diwethaf gan weithwyr yn ein GIG am broblemau difrifol o ran ysbryd a llesiant staff. Mae pobl sy'n gwasanaethu yn y rheng flaen yn honni eu bod ar ben eu tennyn o ganlyniad i rai o'r pwysau sy'n cael eu rhoi arnyn nhw. Nawr, dim ond at un o'r datgeliadau hyn yr wyf i wedi cael caniatâd i gyfeirio ato hyd yma, ond mae'r person wedi gofyn i mi yn benodol i'w godi gyda chi yn y Llywodraeth. Prif Weinidog, mae honiad difrifol yn cael ei wneud bod blaenoriaethu'r gwasanaeth ambiwlans yn rhoi pobl mewn perygl ar adegau o alw uchel. Yn ystod yr wythnosau diwethaf, honnir y bu'n rhaid i gleifion sydd wedi eu categoreiddio fel rhai sy'n addas ar gyfer ymateb 20 munud aros am hyd at chwe awr am ambiwlans. Dywedir wrthyf fod y rhain yn cynnwys cleifion sydd wedi cael strôc, trawiad ar y galon a phroblemau anadlu. Mae'r sawl a ddatgelodd y wybodaeth hon i mi yn absennol o'r gwaith oherwydd straen ar hyn o bryd ac ni all siarad am ei swydd heb fynd yn ddagreuol. Prif Weinidog, sut gellir amddiffyn y sefyllfa hon, a beth ydych chi'n mynd i'w wneud am hyn?