English: Whether delivering preventative services, driving forward the local economy, providing education, social care and leisure centres or collecting bins, resilient local government is essential. The Welsh Local Government Association described the initial local government settlement as, quote: 'a deeply disappointing outcome for councils across Wales with the gravest implications forservices'. In a letter signed by representatives from each political group, the WLGA Conservative group leader, Councillor Peter Fox said: 'With £370m new monies arriving from Westminster, an imaginative approach to funding preventative services to keep people out of hospitals was needed. Instead, the Welsh Government has given the NHS a 7% increase and cut council budgets'. And he subsequently said 'This budget is full of tired and outdated thinking.' He also warned that this was becoming a false economy. With a clear north-south divide, all six north Wales councils would've received a cut of at least 0.5 per cent and three a 1 per cent cut. Responding to the subsequent Welsh Government announcement that, thanks to extra funding from the UK Chancellor, the funding floor had been raised from -1 per cent to -0.5 per cent and that an additional £13 million would take the Welsh average to a flat cash settlement, the WLGA leader stated, quote: 'Despite this welcome announcement, there is no doubt that this remains a particularly challenging financial settlement'. With the exception of Denbighshire, which now receives a flat settlement, all north Wales councils receive a cut, with the largest cuts in Flintshire, Conwy and Anglesey, alongside Monmouthshire and Powys at 3 per cent. So, those councils receiving the lowest per-person funding under the Welsh Government's flawed formula are again hit hardest, and council tax payers, who already pay a higher proportion of their income on council tax than in any other UK nation, will have to bear the burden. Welsh Government Ministers have long deflected the blame by stating that councils in England are worse off than councils in Wales. What they don't state is that it's impossible to make this comparison, because local government funding policy has diverged significantly between the two since devolution, with, for example, direct funding for schools in England only. They don't adjust their figures for that or anything else, because, of course, they are simply here to react against UK Government rather than governing in the best interests of Wales. They also dodge the fact that for every £1 spent by the UK Conservative Government in England on matters devolved in Wales, £1.20 is currently given to Wales. Furthermore, the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition, Jeremy Corbyn's own cheerleaders in chief, recently said that 'no Labour-led council has insufficient reserves that it could not use to generate the resources for a no cuts budget for 2019-20.' Well, in Wales, Labour councils receiving the highest settlement in this budget are sitting on over £800 million in usable reserves. Although the Welsh Government had hailed this budget as having a focus on prevention, their delivery has failed to spend better on prevention and early intervention in order to improve lives and save money. Although an additional £30 million has been allocated to regional partnership boards to deliver joined-up preventative care and support, this sits outside the local government revenue support grant, leaving councils with little ability to invest in these services. Further, there have been a range of real-terms cuts to public health and prevention programmes, and to third sector organisations delivering key preventative services. And third sector representatives on regional partnership boards have reported that the third sector has been seen as a bit-part player with little or no strategic involvement. The local government funding formula, which has not been independently reviewed for 17 years, is overly bureaucratic, complex and outdated. In November, Labour-led Flintshire council launched its #BacktheAsk campaign in full council, and received unanimous cross-party support to, quote, take the fight down to the local government department in Cardiff to get a fair share of national funds. In a joint letter to the Welsh Government, their leader and chief executive said the 'disparity in formula-based fundinginevitably creates a wide variation in the financial risks to councils in Wales. Flintshire is at the extreme end'. Its leader subsequently stated the council is seeking a recognition of how the formula impacts on the council's low-funded position, where compared to the majority of councils in Wales, and in a letter yesterday, he said that Flintshire is a low-funded council at nineteenth out of the 22 councils, despite being sixth largest in population terms, pointed out that the Welsh Government has received an extra £33 million following the recent Chancellor's budget, and asked that this be distributed to councils. I will finish, therefore, by quoting a Labour council representative.
Welsh: Boed yn darparu gwasanaethau ataliol, hybu'r economi leol, darparu addysg, gofal cymdeithasol a chanolfannau hamdden neu gasglu biniau, mae llywodraeth leol gydnerth yn hanfodol. Disgrifiodd Cymdeithas Llywodraeth Leol Cymru y setliad llywodraeth leol cychwynnol fel, ac rwy'n dyfynnu: 'canlyniad siomedig iawn i gynghorau ledled Cymru gyda'r goblygiadau mwyaf difrifol iwasanaethau.' Mewn llythyr a lofnodwyd gan gynrychiolwyr o bob grŵp gwleidyddol, dywedodd arweinydd grŵp Ceidwadol Cymdeithas Llywodraeth Leol Cymru, y cynghorydd Peter Fox: 'Gyda £370 miliwn o arian newydd yn dod o San Steffan, roedd angen dull dychmygus o ariannu gwasanaethau ataliol i gadw pobl allan o ysbytai. Yn hytrach, mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi rhoi cynnydd o 7% i'r GIG ac wedi torri cyllidebau'r cynghorau.' A dywedodd wedyn 'Mae'r gyllideb hon yn llawn meddylfryd llipa a hen ffasiwn.' Rhybuddiodd hefyd bod y sefyllfa'n dod yn economi ffug. Gyda rhaniad clir rhwng y de a'r gogledd, byddai pob un o'r chwe chyngor yn y gogledd wedi gweld toriad o 0.5 y cant o leiaf a thri wedi gweld toriad o 1 y cant. Wrth ymateb i gyhoeddiad Llywodraeth Cymru yn dilyn hynny, diolch i gyllid ychwanegol gan Ganghellor y DU, bod terfyn isaf y cyllid wedi ei gynyddu o -1 y cant i -0.5 y cant ac y byddai £13 miliwn ychwanegol yn mynd â chyfartaledd Cymru i setliad arian safonol, dywedodd arweinydd Cymdeithas Llywodraeth Leol Cymru, ac rwy'n dyfynnu: 'Er gwaethaf y cyhoeddiad hwn sydd i'w groesawu, nid oes amheuaeth bod hwn yn setliad ariannol arbennig o heriol.' Heblaw am sir Ddinbych, sydd bellach yn cael setliad safonol, mae holl gynghorau'r gogledd yn cael toriad, ac mae'r toriadau mwyaf yn sir y Fflint, Conwy ac Ynys Môn, ochr yn ochr â sir Fynwy a Phowys ar 3 y cant. Felly, y cynghorau hynny sy'n derbyn y cyllid isaf fesul unigolyn o dan fformiwla ddiffygiol Llywodraeth Cymru fydd, unwaith eto, yn y sefyllfa waethaf, a bydd talwyr y dreth gyngor, sydd eisoes yn talu cyfran uwch o'u hincwm ar y dreth gyngor nag mewn unrhyw wlad arall yn y DU, yn gorfod ysgwyddo'r baich. Mae Gweinidogion Llywodraeth Cymru wedi osgoi'r bai ers amser drwy ddatgan bod cynghorau yn Lloegr yn waeth eu byd nag y mae cynghorau yng Nghymru. Yr hyn nad ydyn nhw'n ei ddweud yw ei bod hi'n amhosib gwneud y gymhariaeth hon, oherwydd bod gwahaniaeth sylweddol wedi datblygu ym mholisi ariannu llywodraeth leol rhwng y ddau ers datganoli, gyda, er enghraifft, cyllid uniongyrchol ar gyfer ysgolion yn Lloegr yn unig. Nid ydyn nhw'n addasu eu ffigurau ar gyfer hynny nac unrhyw beth arall, oherwydd, wrth gwrs, maen nhw yma i ymateb yn erbyn Llywodraeth y DU yn unig yn hytrach na llywodraethu er budd gorau Cymru. Maen nhw hefyd yn osgoi'r ffaith y rhoddir £1.20 i Gymru ar hyn o bryd am bob £1 a gaiff ei wario gan Lywodraeth Geidwadol y DU yn Lloegr ar faterion sydd wedi eu datganoli yng Nghymru. Yn ogystal â hyn, mae'r Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition, prif gefnogwyr Jeremy Corbyn, wedi dweud yn ddiweddar 'nid oes gan unrhyw gyngor a arweinir gan y blaid lafur gronfeydd wrth gefn mor annigonol na ellid eu defnyddio i gynhyrchu'r adnoddau ar gyfer cyllideb heb unrhyw doriadau ar gyfer 2019-20.' Wel, yng Nghymru, mae gan gynghorau Llafur sy'n cael y setliad uchaf yn y gyllideb hon dros £800 miliwn o gronfeydd wrth gefn y gellid eu defnyddio Er bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi canmol y gyllideb hon fel un â phwyslais ar atal, mae ei darpariaeth wedi methu â gwario'n well ar atal ac ymyrryd yn gynnar er mwyn gwella bywydau ac arbed arian. Er y dyrannwyd £30 miliwn ychwanegol i fyrddau partneriaeth rhanbarthol i ddarparu gofal a chymorth ataliol cydgysylltiedig, mae hyn y tu allan i'r grant cynnal refeniw llywodraeth leol, sy'n golygu nad oes gan gynghorau fawr ddim gallu i fuddsoddi yn y gwasanaethau hyn. Yn ogystal â hyn, cafwyd amrywiaeth o doriadau mewn termau real i iechyd y cyhoedd a rhaglenni atal, ac i sefydliadau trydydd sector sy'n darparu gwasanaethau ataliol allweddol. Ac mae cynrychiolwyr y trydydd sector ar fyrddau partneriaeth rhanbarthol wedi dweud bod y trydydd sector wedi'i ystyried yn rhan lai allweddol heb lawer o gyfraniad strategol neu ddim. Mae'r fformiwla ariannu llywodraeth leol, nad yw wedi ei adolygu'n annibynnol ers 17 mlynedd, yn rhy fiwrocrataidd, yn gymhleth ac yn hen ffasiwn. Ym mis Tachwedd, lansiodd Cyngor Sir y Fflint sydd o dan arweiniad y blaid Lafur ei ymgyrch #CefnogiGalw yn y cyngor llawn, a chafodd gefnogaeth drawsbleidiol unfrydol i, rwy'n dyfynnu, fynd â'r frwydr i lawr i'r adran llywodraeth leol yng Nghaerdydd i gael cyfran deg o arian cenedlaethol. Mewn llythyr ar y cyd i Lywodraeth Cymru, dywedodd arweinydd a phrif weithredwr y Cyngor bod 'y gwahaniaeth mewn ariannu yn seiliedig ar fformiwlayn anochel yn creu amrywiaeth eang yn y risgiau ariannol i gynghorau yng Nghymru. Mae Sir y Fflint ar y pegwn eithaf.' Yn dilyn hynny, dywedodd yr arweinydd bod y cyngor yn ceisio cydnabod effaith y fformiwla ar sefyllfa cyllid isel y cyngor, o'i gymharu â mwyafrif y cynghorau yng Nghymru, ac mewn llythyr ddoe, dywedodd fod sir y Fflint yn gyngor cyllid isel sef y bedwaredd ar bymthegfed o'r 22 o gynghorau, er ei fod y chweched mwyaf o ran poblogaeth, a thynnodd sylw at y ffaith bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi cael £33 miliwn ychwanegol yn dilyn cyllideb ddiweddar y Canghellor, a gofynnodd i hwnnw gael ei ddosbarthu i gynghorau. Fe wnaf i orffen, felly, drwy ddyfynnu un o gynrychiolwyr y Blaid Lafur ar y cyngor.