English: Our position on labour market intelligence and relationships that we have not just with the broader surveys but from business sectors themselves is one that we continue to look at, as we discuss the further path to opening up parts of our economy, as restrictions, we still think, can be eased in the future. That's the incomplete conversation that I referred to in your first question. I don't think it's quite as simple as saying that it will be older or younger workers who will be affected, because actually we know that lots of younger workers have been hit extremely hard during the pandemic as well, and in the sectors you mentioned some people are going back to work, but also those sectors face a real labour challenge in that some people have moved on to different industries and different jobs. So, we have a challenge across a range of ages, and the risk for younger people is that if they're not able to re-enter the world of work, that can have a scarring effect on their future potential and ability to achieve. And older workers, if they're out of work for a long time, and if firms do make choices of either reducing head count or closing their business, as we see the stepped down support from furlough, then there is a real risk, and we've seen this many times with economic shocks in the past, that it can be very difficult for people, particularly higher skilled people, to return to the world of work on salaries that are commensurate, and that in itself has a real impact. So, at more than one age range, we recognise there are significant risks that we're managing in the economy at present. It's why we've called for the UK Government to reconsider its approach to furlough and to think about a more agile way of supporting businesses as those choices are made, and the opening up of our economy is not complete in any part of the UK, and we're equally not entirely certain what will happen in the pandemic and what that may mean about future economic activity as well.
Welsh: Mae ein safbwynt ar wybodaeth am y farchnad lafur a'r cysylltiadau sydd gennym nid yn unig â'r arolygon ehangach ond gyda'r sectorau busnes eu hunain yn un rydym yn parhau i'w ystyried, wrth inni drafod y llwybr pellach tuag at agor rhannau o'n heconomi, fel rydym yn dal i feddwl y gellir llacio'r cyfyngiadau yn y dyfodol. Dyna'r sgwrs anghyflawn y cyfeiriais ati yn eich cwestiwn cyntaf. Ni chredaf ei fod mor syml â dweud mai gweithwyr hŷn neu iau a fydd yn cael eu heffeithio, gan y gwyddom fod llawer o weithwyr iau wedi cael eu taro'n galed iawn yn ystod y pandemig hefyd, ac yn y sectorau y sonioch chi amdanynt, mae rhai pobl yn mynd yn ôl i'r gwaith, ond mae'r sectorau hynny hefyd yn wynebu her wirioneddol mewn perthynas â llafur gan fod rhai pobl wedi symud ymlaen i wahanol ddiwydiannau a gwahanol swyddi. Felly, mae gennym her ar draws ystod o oedrannau, a'r risg i bobl iau, os na allant ailymuno â'r byd gwaith, yw y gall hynny gael effaith andwyol ar eu potensial a'u gallu i gyflawni yn y dyfodol. Ac os yw gweithwyr hŷn allan o waith am gyfnod hir, ac os yw cwmnïau'n gwneud penderfyniadau naill ai i leihau eu nifer o staff neu ddod â'r busnes i ben, wrth inni weld y cymorth ffyrlo'n lleihau, mae yna risg wirioneddol, ac rydym wedi gweld hyn sawl gwaith gyda thrychinebau economaidd yn y gorffennol, y gall fod yn anodd iawn i bobl, yn enwedig pobl â sgiliau uwch, ddychwelyd i fyd gwaith ar gyflogau sy'n gymesur, ac mae hynny ynddo'i hun yn cael effaith wirioneddol. Felly, mewn mwy nag un ystod oedran, rydym yn cydnabod ein bod yn rheoli risgiau sylweddol yn yr economi ar hyn o bryd. Dyna pam ein bod wedi galw ar Lywodraeth y DU i ailystyried ei hymagwedd tuag at ffyrlo ac i feddwl am ffordd fwy hyblyg o gefnogi busnesau wrth i'r penderfyniadau hynny gael eu gwneud, ac nid yw'r broses o ailagor ein heconomi wedi'i chwblhau mewn unrhyw ran o'r DU, ac yn yr un modd, nid ydym yn hollol sicr beth fydd yn digwydd yn y pandemig a beth y gall hynny ei olygu i weithgarwch economaidd yn y dyfodol chwaith.