English: Thank you for the series of comments and questions. I'm pleased to hear you recognise we should get it right this year, and with sufficient ambition that is exactly what we're attempting to deliver. I just want to deal with your point about the end-of-life care and the link to that. In the previous statement, we did have a question from Julie Morgan about end-of-life care and the link in terms of the need to have improvement in end-of-life care for people living with dementia as well. And the points about advance care planning: you need to have that conversation at an early enough stage so that people make active choices, as opposed to having choices made for them, and people have to imagine what someone might have wanted or would have wanted. That's a very difficult position for people to be placed into. And I recognise the points you have made consistently about support workers, about understanding the need, about understanding the areas in which they can be used and about the resource. We've already committed a significant resource up to now, but the different choices that we will choose to make, having had a strategic decision about the action plan, then making sure resources accompany it to deliver on the aims and objectives. Again, I recognise that you've been very consistent about diagnosis rates. It was a significant issue in the consultation. I tried to recognise that in my opening statement. It is important, again, that we have an ambitious and a stretching target, but one that is actually realistic. I want to see a real rate of improvement take place and I don't want there to be excuses about not achieving a target. We have to have something that really can challenge, but really be delivered. It's something that's not just about the diagnosis taking place and the additional support and training that people need to make the diagnosis, but also about making sure that support is in place once that diagnosis has been made as well. I know that was an issue that was raised in the meeting with the cross-party group that I attended. And finally, two points. I think the engagement with the Dementia Engagement and Empowerment Project has been a really important exercise, both before the consultation launch - the pre-consultation - and during the consultation as well. It's really important, if we're going to talk about co-production and the citizen being an equal partner in their healthcare, that that has meaning for the way we design policy as well. So, it isn't just about having professional advocates speaking on behalf of people with dementia. People living directly with dementia themselves have been an important part of the design and delivery up to this point and they will be thereafter in the delivery of services. And finally, I recognise the need to roll out good practice. That's why we'll have a compendium document to go with this to understand what is already taking place and where good practice exists, so that other people can look at how and why that's being created. There is always a challenge in seeing whether good practice really does travel and can be introduced on a more system-wide basis. How often does good practice really relate to a set of circumstances in a locality and a group of inspiring individuals who coalesce by accident and by chance, rather than by actually designing the way the whole system should work? But to understand what that looks like so there's a better prospect for that to actually take place. Finally, to congratulate Big Pit on the dementia-friendly tour. I'd have loved to have been there with you this morning on the tour. I had one of my best days out at the national museum at Big Pit with my father-in-law. It's a fantastic experience, and making sure that there is now a dementia-friendly tour is a big step forward.
Welsh: Diolch am y gyfres o sylwadau a chwestiynau. Rwy'n falch o glywed eich bod yn cydnabod y dylem ei gael yn iawn eleni, a gyda digon o uchelgais dyna'n union yr hyn yr ydym yn ceisio'i gyflawni. Hoffwn ymdrin â'ch pwynt am ofal diwedd oes a'r cysylltiad â hynny. Yn y datganiad blaenorol, cawsom gwestiwn gan Julie Morgan am ofal diwedd oes a'r cysylltiad o ran yr angen i wella gofal diwedd oes i bobl sy'n byw gyda dementia hefyd. A'r pwyntiau am gynllunio gofal ymlaen llaw: mae angen i chi gael y sgwrs honno'n ddigon buan fel bod pobl yn gwneud dewisiadau gweithredol, yn hytrach na chael rhywun yn gwneud y dewisiadau drostynt, ac mae'n rhaid i bobl ddychmygu beth y gallai neu y byddai rhywun wedi'i ddymuno. Mae honno'n sefyllfa anodd iawn i roi pobl ynddi. Ac rwy'n cydnabod y pwyntiau yr ydych wedi'u gwneud yn gyson am weithwyr cymorth, ynghylch deall yr angen, ynghylch deall y meysydd y gellir eu defnyddio ac ynghylch yr adnoddau. Rydym eisoes wedi ymrwymo adnoddau sylweddol hyd yma, ond mae'r dewisiadau gwahanol y byddwn yn dewis eu gwneud, ar ôl cael penderfyniad strategol am y cynllun gweithredu, ac yna gwneud yn siŵr bod adnoddau'n cyd-fynd â hwnnw i gyflawni ar y nodau a'r amcanion. Unwaith eto, rwy'n cydnabod eich bod chi wedi bod yn gyson iawn am gyfraddau diagnosis. Roedd yn fater arwyddocaol yn yr ymgynghoriad. Ceisiais gydnabod hynny yn fy natganiad agoriadol. Mae'n bwysig, unwaith eto, fod gennym darged uchelgeisiol a heriol, ond un sy'n realistig. Rwy'n dymuno gweld gwelliant gwirioneddol yn digwydd ac nid wyf yn dymuno gweld esgusion am beidio â chyflawni targed. Mae'n rhaid i ni gael rhywbeth a all herio, ond hefyd a all gael ei gyflawni. Mae'n rhywbeth sy'n ymwneud nid yn unig â'r diagnosis sy'n digwydd a'r cymorth a'r hyfforddiant ychwanegol y mae pobl eu hangen i wneud y diagnosis, ond hefyd â sicrhau bod cymorth ar gael pan fydd y diagnosis wedi'i wneud hefyd. Gwn fod hynny'n fater a godwyd yn y cyfarfod gyda'r grŵp trawsbleidiol y bûm i ynddo. Ac yn olaf, dau bwynt. Rwy'n teimlo bod y cysylltiad â'r Prosiect Ymgysylltu a Grymuso Dementia wedi bod yn ymarfer pwysig iawn, cyn lansiad yr ymgynghoriad - y cyn-ymgynghoriad - ac yn ystod yr ymgynghoriad hefyd. Mae'n bwysig iawn, os ydym am siarad am gyd-gynhyrchu a bod y dinesydd yn bartner cyfartal yn ei ofal iechyd, bod ystyr i hynny o ran y ffordd yr ydym yn dylunio polisi hefyd. Felly, nid yw'n ymwneud yn unig â chael eiriolwyr proffesiynol yn siarad ar ran pobl â dementia. Mae pobl sy'n byw'n uniongyrchol gyda dementia eu hunain wedi bod yn rhan bwysig o'r cynllunio a chyflawni hyd yn hyn a byddant yn parhau i fod wedyn wrth ddarparu'r gwasanaethau. Ac yn olaf, rwy'n cydnabod bod angen cyflwyno arfer da. Dyna pam y bydd gennym ddogfen gryno i fynd gyda hwn er mwyn deall beth sy'n digwydd eisoes a lle mae arfer da yn bodoli, fel bod pobl eraill yn gallu edrych ar sut a pham y mae hynny'n cael ei greu. Mae her bob amser i weld a yw arferion da yn teithio mewn gwirionedd ac y gellir eu cyflwyno ar draws y system. Pa mor aml y mae arfer da wir yn ymwneud â chyfres o amgylchiadau mewn ardal a grŵp o unigolion ysbrydoledig sy'n dod at ei gilydd ar hap a damwain, yn hytrach na thrwy gynllunio'r ffordd y dylai'r system gyfan weithio? Ond i ddeall sut y mae hynny'n edrych fel bod gwell gobaith i hynny ddigwydd mewn gwirionedd. Yn olaf, i longyfarch Big Pit ar y daith sy'n addas i bobl â dementia. Byddwn wedi bod wrth fy modd o gael ymuno â chi y bore yma ar y daith. Cefais un o fy niwrnodau gorau allan yn yr amgueddfa genedlaethol yn Big Pit gyda'm tad-yng-nghyfraith. Mae'n brofiad gwych, ac mae gwneud yn siŵr bod yna daith sy'n addas i bobl â dementia erbyn hyn yn gam mawr ymlaen.