English: Certainly, we've welcomed the commitments that we've seen from Government, and the steps that have been proposed in some of the consultations, in terms of increasing taxes, and, obviously, the announcement on that just the other day. We also welcome proposals in terms of the regulation of holiday lets, change-of-use class and so on, and so forth, and the commitments in the co-operation agreement between Plaid Cymru and the Government, specifically in this area, in terms of placing a cap on second homes and holiday accommodation in communities. Because if there is one measure that would make a real difference on the ground, then that's it, when you're talking about that specific problem. We don't feel that the proposals in the Welsh language communities housing plan are actually proportionate to the scale of the problem itself. There are a number of quite ambiguous plans, and some ideas that aren't really evidence-based in terms of the difference that they would make on the ground, and also some ideas that are problematic in terms of accepting that community decline is going to happen and that the Government is only able to take mitigating actions. I think some of the measures, particularly in that plan, for example, such as voluntary plans for housing agencies, just divert us from that fundamental need to regulate the housing market, in all parts of the country. And that's what's at the heart of any deficiencies in the response that we've seen from Government - we need to go further, we need to move more quickly, but we need to have a plan in place in order to regulate the housing market in its entirety. Because, at the moment, the free market isn't working in any part of Wales, and that's why we're calling for a property Act, which would tackle this problem at a more fundamental level.
Welsh: Yn sicr, dŷn ni wedi croesawu'r ymrwymiadau dŷn ni wedi eu gweld gan y Llywodraeth a'r mesurau sy'n cael eu cynnig yn rhai o'r ymgynghoriadau sydd wedi bod ar y gweill, o ran cynyddu trethi ac, yn amlwg, y cyhoeddiad y diwrnod o'r blaen ar hynny. Dŷn ni'n croesawu hefyd y cynigion o ran rheoleiddio llety gwyliau, newid dosbarth defnydd ac ati, a'r ymrwymiadau a oedd yn y cytundeb cydweithio rhwng Plaid Cymru a'r Llywodraeth, yn benodol ar y maes yma, o ran gosod cap ar ail dai a llety gwyliau mewn cymunedau. Achos os oes yna un mesur a fyddai'n gwneud gwir wahaniaeth ar lawr gwlad, dyna fe, pan mae'n sôn am y broblem benodol yma. Dŷn ni ddim yn teimlo bod y cynigion yn y cynllun tai cymunedau Cymraeg rili yn gymesur â'r broblem ei hun - lot o gynlluniau reit amwys, a syniadau nad oedd wir ag unrhyw dystiolaeth y tu ôl iddyn nhw o ran y gwahaniaeth y byddan nhw'n ei wneud ar lawr gwlad, a hefyd rhai syniadau eithaf problematig, dwi'n meddwl, o ran derbyn bod dirywiad cymunedol yn mynd i ddigwydd a taw dim ond mesurau lliniaru y mae'r Llywodraeth yn gallu eu cymryd. Dwi'n meddwl bod rhai o'r mesurau, yn enwedig yn y cynllun yna, er enghraifft, fel cynlluniau gwirfoddol i asiantaethau tai, yn rhai sydd, rili, jest yn ein dargyfeirio ni o'r angen sylfaenol i reoleiddio'r farchnad dai, ymhob rhan o'r wlad. A dyna, rili, sydd wrth wraidd unrhyw ddiffygion yn yr ymatebion dŷn ni wedi eu gweld gan y Llywodraeth hyd yn hyn - mae angen mynd ymhellach, mae angen symud yn gynt, ond mae angen cael cynllun er mwyn rheoleiddio'r farchnad dai yn llwyr. Achos, ar hyn o bryd, dydy'r farchnad rydd ddim yn gweithio mewn unrhyw ran o Gymru, a dyna pam dŷn ni'n galw am Ddeddf eiddo, a fyddai'n mynd i'r afael â'r broblem yma ar lefel fwy sylfaenol.