techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I didn't hear any recognition there in the First Minister's response to much of the analysis that we saw from the media in response to the latest announcement, that Wales has a reputation, doesn't it, as the country where major projects go to die? There's a seeming inability to actually bring forward major transformational projects. We heard the language of transformation again from the economic Minister, but where is the implementation of that? We had the fiasco of the Circuit of Wales, but that's just one example over many, many years. Isn't part of the problem, in relation to the three specific projects that I referred to, in part or in totality, that we are often relying on decisions made by others? If you like, we put our eggs in someone else's basket. And so, our economic strategy is being constantly driven by forces from outside Wales. Now, I know your own view is that the ultimate answer to Wales's problems is the election of a different government at Westminster, but that isn't what devolution was meant to be about. So, when are we going to see, First Minister, an autonomous, ambitious, home-grown economic strategy that isn't dependent on what others decide for us, but is built instead around what we are determined to do for ourselves?
Welsh: Chlywais i ddim cydnabyddiaeth yn y fan yna yn ymateb y Prif Weinidog i lawer o'r gwaith dadansoddi a welsom gan y cyfryngau mewn ymateb i'r cyhoeddiad diweddaraf, bod gan Gymru enw, onid oes, fel y wlad lle mae prosiectau mawr yn mynd i farw? Mae'n ymddangos bod anallu i fwrw ymlaen â phrosiectau gweddnewidiol mawr. Clywsom iaith gweddnewid unwaith eto gan Weinidog yr economi, ond lle mae gweithrediad hynny? Cawsom ffiasgo Cylchffordd Cymru, ond dim ond un enghraifft yw honno dros lawer iawn o flynyddoedd. Onid rhan o'r broblem, o ran y tri phrosiect penodol y cyfeiriais atynt, yn rhannol neu'n llwyr, yw ein bod ni'n aml yn dibynnu ar benderfyniadau a wneir gan eraill? Os hoffech chi, rydym ni'n rhoi ein hwyau ym masged rhywun arall. Ac felly, mae ein strategaeth economaidd yn cael ei hysgogi'n gyson gan rymoedd o'r tu allan i Gymru. Nawr, gwn mai eich safbwynt chi eich hun yw mai'r ateb i broblemau Cymru yn y pen draw yw ethol gwahanol lywodraeth yn San Steffan, ond dyna oedd diben datganoli i fod. Felly, pryd ydym ni'n mynd i weld, Prif Weinidog, strategaeth economaidd ymreolus, uchelgeisiol, gynhenid nad yw'n ddibynnol ar yr hyn y mae pobl eraill yn ei benderfynu ar ein cyfer, ond yn seiliedig yn hytrach ar yr hyn yr ydym ni'n benderfynol o'i wneud drosom ein hunain?
English: Well, Dirprwy Lywydd, I always have a much more optimistic view of Wales than the Member ever offers us on the Assembly floor, and I don't for a minute think that it helps Wales to repeat the sort of canards that the right-wing press in London put about, about Wales being somewhere where projects go to die. It's nonsensical. It's nonsensical in every part of Wales, where people will see the investments that we are making in public facilities, in transport infrastructure, in a £5 billion rail franchise, in a new convention centre that will bring activity to Wales from other parts of the United Kingdom. His position always seems curious to me. In a global world, he wants to argue for an autonomous Wales. Somehow, capital decisions and capital flows ended at our border, and if only we were in charge of these things, we would be able to make different decisions by Japanese governments and others who make these decisions in other parts of the world. I take a different view to him; I think we do far better in Wales than he ever seems willing to recognise, and I don't believe for a moment that his ambitions to cut Wales off from the rest of the United Kingdom and make us, in his terms, 'autonomous' would in any way help us to create the sort of future for our country that we would like to see.
Welsh: Wel, Dirprwy Lywydd, mae gen i olwg llawer mwy gobeithiol o Gymru bob amser nag y bydd yr Aelod byth yn ei gynnig i ni ar lawr y Cynulliad, ac nid wyf i'n meddwl am funud ei bod hi o gymorth i Gymru i ailadrodd y math o chwedlau y mae'r wasg adain dde yn Llundain yn eu lledaenu, am Gymru fel rhywle lle mae prosiectau yn mynd i farw. Mae'n hurt. Mae'n hurt ym mhob rhan o Gymru, lle bydd pobl yn gweld y buddsoddiadau yr ydym ni'n eu gwneud mewn cyfleusterau cyhoeddus, mewn seilwaith trafnidiaeth, mewn masnachfraint rheilffyrdd gwerth £5 biliwn, mewn canolfan gonfensiwn newydd a fydd yn dod â gweithgarwch i Gymru o rannau eraill o'r Deyrnas Unedig. Mae ei safbwynt yn ymddangos yn rhyfedd i mi bob amser. Mewn byd byd-eang, mae ef eisiau dadlau dros Gymru ymreolaethol. Penderfyniadau cyfalaf a llifoedd cyfalaf yn terfynu, rywsut, ar ein ffin, ond pe byddem ni'n gyfrifol am y pethau hyn, byddem ni'n gallu gwneud gwahanol benderfyniadau gan lywodraethau Japaneaidd ac eraill sy'n gwneud y penderfyniadau hyn mewn rhannau eraill o'r byd. Rwy'n arddel gwahanol farn iddo ef; rwy'n credu ein bod ni'n gwneud yn llawer gwell yng Nghymru nag y mae ef byth yn barod i'w gydnabod, ac nid wyf i'n credu am eiliad y byddai ei uchelgeisiau i wahanu Cymru oddi wrth weddill y Deyrnas Unedig a'n gwneud ni, gan ddefnyddio ei dermau ef, yn 'ymreolaethol' yn ein helpu mewn unrhyw ffordd i greu'r math o ddyfodol i'n gwlad yr hoffem ni ei weld.
English: Well, in the spirit of a kinder politics, maybe I can help the First Minister. Later this afternoon, we'll have a whole series of statements on planning to mitigate the impact of a 'no deal' Brexit. There's one area that is curiously absent, which is the economy. Now, the Chancellor in Westminster has confirmed that there would be an emergency fiscal stimulus in the event of a 'no deal' Brexit, similar to that used by Gordon Brown at the time of the financial crisis. Now, the Welsh Government surely needs a similar plan, and in the wake of the news over Ford and Wylfa, we need it urgently. So, why not ask the newly constituted National Infrastructure Commission for Wales to identify major projects across Wales as part of a multibillion pound programme of capital investment? You could fund it via your own new Welsh Government bond - in the event of a crash-out 'no deal', a Brexit bond that Welsh citizens could purchase to do their bit to help rebuild the Welsh economy. This is exactly the kind of creative and collaborative response that led, during the last economic crisis, to ideas like ProAct and ReAct and a series of emergency economic summits in the spirit of team Wales. But you know, First Minister, team Wales needs a captain, and it needs a game plan. I've heard the economy Minister reel off a long list of possibilities for Wales, and among them was us becoming a home of driverless technology. At the moment, we have a driverless Government, and as a result of that, we have a driverless economy as well.
Welsh: Wel, yn ysbryd gwleidyddiaeth fwy caredig, efallai y gallaf i helpu'r Prif Weinidog. Yn ddiweddarach y prynhawn yma, bydd gennym ni gyfres o ddatganiadau ar gynllunio i liniaru effaith Brexit heb gytundeb. Mae un maes sy'n rhyfedd o absennol, sef yr economi. Nawr, mae'r Canghellor yn San Steffan wedi cadarnhau y byddai ysgogiad cyllidol brys mewn achos o Brexit heb gytundeb, tebyg i'r un a ddefnyddiwyd gan Gordon Brown ar adeg yr argyfwng ariannol. Nawr, does bosib nad oes angen cynllun tebyg ar Lywodraeth Cymru, ac yn sgil y newyddion ynghylch Ford a Wylfa, rydym ni ei angen ar frys. Felly, pam na wnawn ni ofyn i Gomisiwn Seilwaith Cenedlaethol Cymru sydd newydd gael ei sefydlu nodi prosiectau mawr ledled Cymru yn rhan o raglen buddsoddiad cyfalaf gwerth sawl biliwn? Gallech chi ariannu hynny trwy eich bond Llywodraeth Cymru newydd eich hun - mewn achos trychinebus o ddim cytundeb, bond Brexit y gallai dinasyddion Cymru ei brynu i chwarae eu rhan yn y gwaith o helpu i ailadeiladu economi Cymru. Dyma'r union fath o ymateb creadigol a chydweithredol a arweiniodd, yn ystod yr argyfwng economaidd diwethaf, at syniadau fel ProAct a ReAct a chyfres o uwchgynadleddau economaidd brys yn ysbryd tîm Cymru. Ond wyddoch chi, Prif Weinidog, mae angen capten ar dîm Cymru, ac mae angen cynllun arno. Rwyf i wedi clywed Gweinidog yr economi yn cyflwyno rhestr hirfaith o bosibiliadau ar gyfer Cymru, ac yn eu plith oedd Cymru'n dod yn gartref i dechnoleg heb yrrwr. Ar hyn o bryd, mae gennym ni Lywodraeth heb yrrwr, ac o ganlyniad i hynny, mae gennym ni economi heb yrrwr hefyd.
English: Well, as soundbites go, it didn't go very far, Dirprwy Lywydd, did it? Of course we have a plan, and of course we have a pipeline of projects. We set them out in front of the Assembly last year, we refresh it all the time, and we certainly look at it in the context of decisions made at Wylfa and in the context of Brexit. But, Dirprwy Lywydd, Wales needs a captain, but Wales needs a captain that at least understands the rules, because I've heard the Member offer us his bond idea many times on the floor of this Assembly, and as he knows perfectly well, Welsh bonds do not add a single pound to our capacity to invest in capital projects. He knows perfectly well that the rules are that that would count against all our other capital investments and would simply substitute for other and cheaper money than we currently enjoy. It's not an idea that gets off the ground for an instant. Now, that there are some things that the Member has said this afternoon that I don't disagree with. I think it's very important that we plan ahead. I think it's very important that we have a pipeline, which he refers to, but it doesn't help anybody to pluck out of the air, and parade it as though it were a solution to our problem, an idea that makes no contribution at all.
Welsh: Wel, cyn belled ag y mae datganiadau bachog yn y cwestiwn, ni aeth yn bell iawn, Dirprwy Lywydd, naddo? Wrth gwrs bod gennym ni gynllun, ac wrth gwrs bod gennym ni biblinell o brosiectau. Fe'u cyflwynwyd gerbron y Cynulliad gennym y llynedd, rydym ni'n ei adnewyddu drwy'r amser, ac rydym ni'n sicr yn ei ystyried yng nghyd-destun penderfyniadau a wneir yn Wylfa ac yng nghyd-destun Brexit. Ond, Dirprwy Lywydd, mae Cymru angen capten, ond mae Cymru angen capten sydd o leiaf yn deall y rheolau, oherwydd rwyf i wedi clywed yr Aelod yn cynnig ei syniad bond i ni lawer gwaith ar lawr y Cynulliad hwn, ac fel y gŵyr yn iawn, nid yw bondiau Cymru yn ychwanegu yr un bunt at ein gallu i fuddsoddi mewn prosiectau cyfalaf. Mae'n gwybod yn iawn mai'r rheolau yw y byddai hynny'n cyfrif yn erbyn ein holl fuddsoddiadau cyfalaf eraill a'r cwbl y byddai'n ei wneud fyddai cymryd lle arian arall, rhatach yr ydym ni eisoes yn ei fwynhau. Nid yw'n syniad sy'n ymarferol am eiliad. Nawr, mae rhai pethau y mae'r Aelod wedi eu dweud y prynhawn yma nad wyf i'n anghytuno â nhw. Rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n bwysig iawn i ni gynllunio ymlaen llaw. Rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n bwysig iawn bod gennym ni biblinell, y mae'n cyfeirio ati, ond nid yw'n helpu neb i dynnu allan o'r awyr, a'i gyflwyno fel pe byddai'n ateb i'n problem, syniad nad yw'n gwneud unrhyw gyfraniad o gwbl.
English: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. First Minister, Adam Price touched briefly on the issue of Brexit in his questions. As we both know, there are 66 days to go before the UK is due to depart the European Union. Theresa May has ruled out delaying the date of departure. She has also ruled out a second referendum, so the default position is that we leave the EU on 29 March. Given that, First Minister, would it be a good idea if the Welsh Government now simply accepted this outcome and focused on preparing for the 'no deal' Brexit instead of trying to stop Brexit from happening?
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Prif Weinidog, cyfeiriodd Adam Price yn gryno at fater Brexit yn ei gwestiynau. Fel y mae'r ddau ohonom ni'n ei wybod, mae 66 diwrnod ar ôl cyn y disgwylir i'r DU ymadael â'r Undeb Ewropeaidd. Mae Theresa May wedi diystyru gohirio'r dyddiad ymadael. Mae hi hefyd wedi diystyru ail refferendwm, felly y sefyllfa fel y mae hi yw ein bod ni'n gadael yr UE ar 29 Mawrth. O ystyried hynny Prif Weinidog, a fyddai'n syniad da pe byddai Llywodraeth Cymru yn derbyn y canlyniad hwn erbyn hyn a chanolbwyntio ar baratoi ar gyfer y Brexit heb gytundeb yn hytrach na cheisio atal Brexit rhag digwydd?
English: Well, Dirprwy Lywydd, the rest of the afternoon will help to provide the answer to the Member's question. Of course, the Welsh Government does not accept, and will not accept, that we are simply on an inevitable path to the disaster that a 'no deal' Brexit would be for Wales. As a responsible Government, we do the things that Members around this Chamber have asked us to do, and that is to prepare against the worst, and you will hear this afternoon the many things that we are doing as a Government. But do we accept that we are all somehow tied to a train that the Prime Minister has set off and that there's no alternative for us but to career off the edge with her? Well, of course we don't.
Welsh: Wel, Dirprwy Lywydd, bydd gweddill y prynhawn yn helpu i roi ateb i gwestiwn yr Aelod. Wrth gwrs, nid yw Llywodraeth Cymru yn derbyn, ac ni fydd yn derbyn, ein bod ni ar lwybr anochel i'r drychineb y byddai Brexit heb gytundeb i Gymru. Fel Llywodraeth gyfrifol, rydym ni'n gwneud y pethau y mae'r aelodau o gwmpas y Siambr hon wedi gofyn i ni ei wneud, sef paratoi ar gyfer y gwaethaf, a byddwch yn clywed y prynhawn yma y llawer o bethau yr ydym ni'n eu gwneud fel Llywodraeth. Ond nid ydym ni'n derbyn ein bod ni i gyd rywsut wedi ein clymu i drên y mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi ei gychwyn ac nad oes unrhyw ddewis arall i ni ond rhuthro dros yr ymyl gyda hi? Wel, wrth gwrs nad ydym ni.
English: I know that there are many statements this afternoon, and I'm actually glad that there are statements coming out in a sense, because there is an element in what the Welsh Government is saying, in that you are making preparations for Brexit, which we very much welcome on this side of the Chamber. But, at the same time, you are still clinging to this idea that you've just articulated once again, that you can somehow help to force a second referendum and thwart Brexit from happening. Now, why would you want to do that when you have a clear democratic mandate from the majority of Welsh voters, who voted to leave the EU? In short, why are you so set on going against what the people of Wales voted for? And why have you scrapped a whole day's business here today, largely to indulge in a day of project fear?
Welsh: Gwn fod llawer o ddatganiadau y prynhawn yma, ac rwy'n falch mewn gwirionedd bod datganiadau yn cael eu gwneud mewn ffordd, oherwydd mae elfen yn yr hyn y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn ei ddweud, o'r safbwynt eich bod chi'n gwneud paratoadau ar gyfer Brexit, yr ydym ni'n ei groesawu'n fawr iawn ar yr ochr hon i'r Siambr. Ond, ar yr un pryd, rydych chi'n dal i lynu at y syniad hwn yr ydych chi newydd ei fynegi unwaith eto, y gallwch chi helpu rywsut i orfodi ail refferendwm ac atal Brexit rhag digwydd. Nawr, pam fyddech chi eisiau gwneud hynny pan fo gennych chi fandad democrataidd eglur gan y rhan fwyaf o bleidleiswyr Cymru, a bleidleisiodd i adael yr UE? Yn gryno, pam ydych chi mor benderfynol o fynd yn groes i'r hyn y pleidleisiodd pobl Cymru drosto? A pham ydych chi wedi cael gwared ar fusnes diwrnod cyfan yma heddiw, er mwyn ymroi i raddau helaeth i ddiwrnod o brosiect ofn?
English: Well, Dirprwy Lywydd, I think the Member's contribution began by welcoming the statements that are in front of the Assembly this afternoon and the fact that we are preparing against an eventuality that we absolutely do not want to see, and then described the same thing in alarmist terms. Dirprwy Lywydd, let me be clear: from the day of the referendum, the previous First Minister said - and I often had the opportunity to echo him - that the Welsh Government was focused not on the fact of Brexit, but on the form of Brexit. The fact of Brexit had been put to people in a referendum, but the way you leave the European Union has many different possibilities and is on a very wide spectrum. We continue to believe that it is possible that the House of Commons may find a centre of gravity that would support a form of Brexit that will be aligned with the one that we set out together with Plaid Cymru in 'Securing Wales' Future'. We've also said that if the House of Commons is deadlocked and cannot deliver an orderly way of leaving the European Union, then putting that decision back to people for them to have the final word would have to be the way in which that would be resolved.
Welsh: Wel, Dirprwy Lywydd, rwy'n credu bod cyfraniad yr Aelod wedi dechrau trwy groesawu'r datganiadau sydd gerbron y Cynulliad y prynhawn yma a'r ffaith ein bod ni'n paratoi ar gyfer sefyllfa derfynol yr ydym ni'n sicr ddim eisiau ei gweld, ac yna wedi disgrifio'r un peth mewn termau codi bwganod. Dirprwy Lywydd, gadewch i mi fod yn eglur: o ddiwrnod y refferendwm, dywedodd y Prif Weinidog blaenorol - a chefais innau'r cyfle i'w ategu yn aml - bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn canolbwyntio nid ar ffaith Brexit, ond ar ffurf Brexit. Roedd ffaith Brexit wedi cael ei rhoi gerbron y bobl mewn refferendwm, ond ceir llawer o wahanol bosibiliadau o ran y ffordd yr ydych chi'n gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd ac mae ar sbectrwm eang iawn. Rydym ni'n parhau i gredu ei bod hi'n bosibl y gallai Tŷ'r Cyffredin ddod o hyd i dir cyffredin a fyddai'n cefnogi math o Brexit a fydd yn cyd-fynd â'r un a nodwyd gennym ni ynghyd â Phlaid Cymru yn 'Diogelu Dyfodol Cymru'. Rydym ni hefyd wedi dweud os bydd Tŷ'r Cyffredin yn methu â gwneud penderfyniad ac na all sicrhau ffordd drefnus o adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, yna mae'n rhaid mai trosglwyddo'r penderfyniad yn ôl i'r bobl iddyn nhw gael y gair olaf fyddai'r ffordd y byddai hynny'n cael ei ddatrys.
English: Well, I do really question whether the will of the people who are sitting in the House of Commons overrules the people of the United Kingdom, who have already had their say on this matter. And as was made clear by David Cameron when he gave us this referendum in the first place, it was supposed to be a vote that was going to be binding on the House of Commons. Constitutionally perhaps impossible, but you should at least engage with what the majority of the people of the UK, and indeed, the people of Wales, have voted for. So, I would ask you again: I do like an element of these statements - we do have to make contingency plans for leaving, and I'm glad you're doing that - but can I please ask you, going forward, if we're going to have 12 weeks of this, can you focus on the actual contingencies and not on trying to thwart Brexit, and trying to thwart what the people of Wales voted for?
Welsh: Wel, rwyf i wir yn cwestiynu pa un a yw ewyllys y bobl sy'n eistedd yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin yn drech na phobl y Deyrnas Unedig, sydd eisoes wedi mynegi eu barn ar y mater hwn. Ac fel y gwnaethpwyd yn eglur gan David Cameron pan roddodd y refferendwm hwn i ni yn y lle cyntaf, roedd i fod yn bleidlais a oedd yn mynd i rwymo Tŷ'r Cyffredin. Amhosibl yn gyfansoddiadol efallai, ond dylech chi o leiaf ymgysylltu â'r hyn y mae mwyafrif pobl y DU, ac yn wir, pobl Cymru, wedi pleidleisio drosto. Felly, gofynnaf i chi eto: rwyf i yn hoffi elfen o'r datganiadau hyn - mae'n rhaid i ni wneud cynlluniau wrth gefn ar gyfer gadael, ac rwy'n falch eich bod chi'n gwneud hynny - ond a gaf i ofyn i chi os gwelwch yn dda, wrth symud ymlaen, os ydym ni'n mynd i gael 12 wythnos o hyn, a allwch chi ganolbwyntio ar y cynlluniau wrth gefn eu hunain ac nid ar geisio atal Brexit, a cheisio atal yr hyn y pleidleisiodd pobl Cymru drosto?
English: Well, as I've said, Llywydd, I don't believe for a moment that the actions of this Welsh Government have been about thwarting the referendum; it has all been about how we leave the European Union, and the way in which we leave the European Union, the conditions under which we leave the European Union. We may have different views around the Chamber as to the best way in which Brexit can be made to happen, but that's what we've been talking about all the time. Now, there are many people who, as the realities of what that will mean dawn upon them, come to see the sense of what this Government said to people in Wales in the run-up to the referendum - that Wales's future was best secured through continued membership of the European Union. And if it proves impossible for the House of Commons to agree on an orderly way in which Brexit can happen, I do not see how it is in any way not a democratic course of action to go back to the people of the United Kingdom and to get their view on how that might best be resolved.
Welsh: Wel, fel yr wyf i wedi ei ddweud, Llywydd, nid wyf i'n meddwl am eiliad mai bwriad gweithredoedd y Llywodraeth Cymru hon oedd atal canlyniad y refferendwm; bu'r holl drafodaethau ynghylch sut yr ydym ni'n gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, a'r ffordd y byddwn ni'n gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, yr amodau y byddwn yn gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd yn unol â nhw. Efallai fod gennym ni wahanol safbwyntiau o gwmpas y Siambr hon ynghylch y ffordd orau y gellir gwneud i Brexit ddigwydd, ond dyna yr ydym ni wedi bod yn ei drafod yr holl amser. Nawr, ceir llawer o bobl sydd, wrth i realiti'r hyn y bydd hynny'n ei olygu yn eu taro, yn dod i weld synnwyr yr hyn a ddywedodd y Llywodraeth hon wrth bobl yng Nghymru yn y cyfnod cyn y refferendwm - bod dyfodol Cymru yn cael ei sicrhau orau trwy aelodaeth barhaus o'r Undeb Ewropeaidd. Ac os bydd yn amhosibl i Dŷ'r Cyffredin gytuno ar ffordd drefnus y gall Brexit ddigwydd, nid wyf i'n gweld sut mewn unrhyw ffordd nad yw'n weithred ddemocrataidd mynd yn ôl at bobl y Deyrnas Unedig a chael eu barn ar y ffordd orau o ddatrys hynny.
English: I thank the Member for the question. In the most recent year for which figures are available, recorded crime rose, but self-reported crime continued to fall. Responsibility for data on offending rates lies with the UK Government, while we continue to work with UK Ministers to ensure that Welsh interests in this area are properly understood.
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn. Yn y flwyddyn ddiweddaraf y mae ffigurau ar gael ar ei chyfer, cynyddodd troseddau a gofnodwyd, ond parhaodd troseddau hunan-adroddedig i ostwng. Llywodraeth y DU sy'n gyfrifol am ddata ar gyfraddau troseddu, ac rydym ni'n parhau i weithio gyda Gweinidogion y DU i sicrhau bod dealltwriaeth briodol o fuddiannau Cymru yn y maes hwn.
English: Thank you for that answer, First Minister. As Leanne Wood said earlier, the recent report on custodial numbers in Wales is especially shocking, given that the crime rate here is lower than in England. The National Association of Probation Officers in Wales has highlighted that appropriate sentencing and effective rehabilitation is fundamental to resolving the issue. The UK Government's disastrous transforming rehabilitation reforms, disintegrated probation, failed the public, and deprived offenders of rehabilitation opportunities. Will the First Minister challenge the UK Government on this, call for a fully unified, properly resourced, public sector probation service, and what further discussions has the Welsh Government had with the probation service regarding the reducing reoffending strategy and steps that can be taken to support rehabilitation?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb yna, Prif Weinidog. Fel y dywedodd Leanne Wood yn gynharach, mae'r adroddiad diweddar ar niferoedd sy'n cael eu dedfrydu yng Nghymru yn arbennig o syfrdanol, o gofio bod y gyfradd droseddu yma yn is nag yn Lloegr. Mae Cymdeithas Genedlaethol y Swyddogion Prawf yng Nghymru wedi amlygu bod dedfrydu priodol ac adsefydlu effeithiol yn hanfodol i ddatrys y broblem. Fe wnaeth diwygiadau gweddnewid adsefydlu trychinebus Llywodraeth y DU, ddifa'r gwasanaeth prawf, methu'r cyhoedd ac amddifadu troseddwyr o gyfleoedd adsefydlu. A wnaiff y Prif Weinidog herio Llywodraeth y DU ar hyn, galw am wasanaeth prawf sector cyhoeddus cwbl unedig, gydag adnoddau priodol, a pha drafodaethau pellach y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi eu cael gyda'r gwasanaeth prawf ynghylch y strategaeth lleihau aildroseddu a'r camau y gellir eu cymryd i gefnogi adsefydlu?