English: I thank the Member for that important supplementary question, and agree with a great deal of what she said in introducing the question. The big picture in criminal justice in England and Wales has been the same for nearly a quarter of a century. Recorded crime rates are falling, fewer people are appearing before the courts, yet more people are being sent to prison and for longer. That is not an acceptable set of circumstances to the Welsh Government, and it's particularly unacceptable in the circumstances that Leanne Wood referred to, where, for example, as the fact file tells us, a quarter of the women who are sent to prison in Wales are sent to prison for less than a month. And yet, in a month, you can lose your home, you can lose your job, you can lose your children - in the way that Janet Finch-Saunders identified - and these are for non-violent offences and, in some cases, for offences that are being committed for the very first time. That serves nobody. It serves neither the individual, the victims, nor society as a whole. I want, Dirprwy Lywydd, to take a practical approach to devolution of the criminal justice system. I don't want us to miss out on practical actions that we could achieve by searching for something that is beyond our ability to deliver. So, I believe that there are three areas with which we should begin as a focus. We should seek the devolution of the youth justice system, we should seek the devolution of the probation service to Wales, and we should seek new powers in relation to women offenders. Those are the areas of the criminal justice system that sit closest to the responsibilities that are already devolved and where we could make the most immediate difference. I think, in a practical way, we should focus on those aspects first, and if we can secure their devolution to Wales, then we will be able to move on from there into the other aspects that would follow.
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn atodol pwysig yna, ac rwy'n cytuno â llawer iawn o'r hyn a ddywedodd wrth gyflwyno'r cwestiwn. Mae'r darlun cyffredinol o ran cyfiawnder troseddol yng Nghymru a Lloegr wedi bod yr un fath ers bron i chwarter canrif. Mae cyfraddau troseddau a gofnodir yn gostwng, mae llai o bobl yn ymddangos gerbron y llysoedd, ac eto mae mwy o bobl yn cael eu hanfon i'r carchar ac am fwy o amser. Nid yw honno'n gyfres dderbyniol o amgylchiadau i Lywodraeth Cymru, ac mae'n arbennig o annerbyniol yn yr amgylchiadau y cyfeiriodd Leanne Wood atyn nhw, pan, er enghraifft, fel y mae'r ffeil ffeithiau yn ei ddweud wrthym ni, fod chwarter y menywod sy'n cael eu hanfon i'r carchar yng Nghymru yn cael eu hanfon i'r carchar am lai na mis. Ac eto, mewn mis, gallwch golli eich cartref, gallwch golli eich swydd, gallwch golli eich plant - yn y modd y nododd Janet Finch-Saunders - ac mae'r rhain am droseddau di-drais ac, mewn rhai achosion, am droseddau sy'n cael eu cyflawni am y tro cyntaf. Nid yw hynny o fudd i neb. Nid yw o fudd i'r unigolyn, y dioddefwyr, na'r gymdeithas yn gyffredinol. Hoffwn, Dirprwy Lywydd, fabwysiadu dull ymarferol o ddatganoli'r system cyfiawnder troseddol. Nid wyf eisiau i ni beidio â chael y camau ymarferol y gallem ni eu cymryd drwy chwilio am rywbeth sydd y tu hwnt i'n gallu i'w gyflawni. Felly, rwy'n credu bod tri maes y dylem ni ddechrau â nhw fel pwyslais. Dylem ni geisio datganoli'r system cyfiawnder ieuenctid, dylem ni geisio datganoli'r gwasanaeth prawf i Gymru, a dylem ni geisio pwerau newydd o ran troseddwyr benywaidd. Dyna'r rhannau o'r system cyfiawnder troseddol sydd agosaf at y cyfrifoldebau sydd wedi'u datganoli eisoes a lle y gallem ni wneud y gwahaniaeth mwyaf uniongyrchol. Rwy'n credu, mewn ffordd ymarferol, y dylem ni ganolbwyntio ar yr agweddau hynny yn gyntaf, ac os gallwn ni sicrhau eu bod yn cael eu datganoli i Gymru, yna byddwn yn gallu symud ymlaen o'r fan honno i'r agweddau eraill a fyddai'n dilyn.