English: Diolch, Lywydd. Could I also thank the Assembly for the chance to be the first Member to make use of this new piece of business? I'd also like to thank my former office manager, Mark Major, who brought the whole subject to my attention when I first became an Assembly Member. A six-year campaign began with a statement of opinion in 2011, seeking support for the mandatory teaching of emergency life-saving skills in school and then a short debate in which the present education Secretary, as well as Plaid and Labour Members, spoke in its favour. Support came from every party in the fourth Assembly, and it seems that every party in this fifth Assembly also supports the principle. I want to thank all of those of you who have already tabled your support for the proposal today, the core of which is the right to be trained to save a life. In so doing, you're supporting a principle that has been fought for over many years. The introduction of mandatory life-saving skills onto the school curriculum is supported by the British Heart Foundation, St John Ambulance, the British Red Cross, but also the College of Paramedics, the Royal College of Physicians, Cardiac Risk in the Young, British Cardiovascular Society Education, the Association for Physical Education, the NT - in England, anyway - Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome UK, the Royal College of Nursing, the Arrhythmia Alliance UK, the British Medical Association, the Welsh ambulance service, the Atrial Fibrillation Association, the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, the Royal Life Saving Society and many others. I've had e-mails of support and social media support for this for the last 48 hours. It's been utterly amazing. You are also supporting the wishes of parents and young people. The British Heart Foundation found that 86 per cent of UK parents want emergency and lifesaving skills taught in schools - it's actually 88 per cent in Wales. Seventy-eight per cent of children themselves wanted to learn it in school, and 75 per cent of teachers, who already have a crowded curriculum, want this taught in our schools. You are also supporting the wishes of Labour MP Teresa Pearce. Ms Pearce had cross-party support for her Bill on a similar theme, but it was talked out - a process we don't have here - by that infamous Conservative MP, Philip Davies. In this ongoing campaign, Cabinet Secretary, I wonder how comfortable you would find yourself to be on the same side of the argument as the infamous Conservative MP Philip Davies. So, why legislation? Well, first of all, I want to congratulate all schools who have given their time voluntarily and used school time to give their children a chance to save lives. I want to congratulate those charities - I've mentioned some already - the public services, the military cadets, Heartstart and Reactive First Aid, who can provide training of all kinds, and charities like Cariad who help provide defibrillators. Hats off to Shoctober, Defibruary, Save a Life September, Staying Alive - you all remember Vinnie Jones on that one - defibrillators in old phone boxes, and all the awareness campaigns. This is excellent work and, without it, our poor survival rates for cardiac arrest outside the hospital environment would be even worse. Around 90 per cent of those victims will die - perhaps even more, according to one source - and even though most of these victims will have somebody with them when they suffer their event, they will still die. Without circulating blood, it takes only six minutes for a victim to have permanent brain damage. After 10 minutes, it's basically too late. So, shouldn't a child grow up with the right to know how to intervene - how to help save a life? In 2013, only 20 per cent of children in England and Wales had had a minimum of one lifesaving skills lesson in the whole of their school life, and one lesson is nowhere near enough here. You can tell, because only 4 per cent of them had the confidence to intervene - 4 per cent. Yet, 94 per cent of secondary schoolchildren said that they would be more confident if they had updated training relatively regularly. I wish nothing but the best for the Government's cardiac plan, but if you can't guarantee whole-population level uptake, competence and confidence, step one of that plan will fail because of the random occurrence of cardiac arrest. And on the basis that you say we still need a mapping exercise to know who provides CPR; that you still have to go to page two of Google to get anywhere near the ambulance service's list of defibrillators; and that Donaldson's curriculum change is some time away, I don't think we have time for good will and good work to give us that whole-population level change. Eight thousand people in Wales will have a heart attack outside a hospital setting this year, and most of them will die because of bystander ignorance or fear. So, who has that whole-population uptake, competence and confidence in first aid skills - and it's not just CPR? Well, let's have a look at the screens: Norway, 95 per cent; Germany, 80 per cent; Austria, 80 per cent; Iceland, 75 per cent. Even France is at 40 per cent. Now how did that happen? Because of a legislative obligation to receive mandatory lifesaving skills training at various periods in the lives of those citizens. In Denmark and Switzerland, you can't even get your driving licence unless you've done this training. And which countries have the highest rate of survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Some of them are at well over 50 per cent - that's compared to our 3 to 10 per cent. Well, I'm sure that you can guess. This legislative proposal is not just about cardiac arrest, about CPR and defibrillators; I want our children growing up with the confidence to intervene when they encounter a person who is bleeding, unconscious, fitting, choking, who's been electrocuted, or shows signs of drowning. A new scheme in the poorest part of northern Bangladesh has acted on this last point, and nine-year-olds there are having to learn CPR and how to save a life after a potential drowning. And these are just proposals, of course. They're not fully developed, but they're certainly not difficult or expensive to deliver. They don't clash with Professor Donaldson's suggestion that legislation should be used to define a broad set of duties. You could start consulting on these tomorrow. So, Members, I think this is an occasion where the Norway model definitely is appropriate for Wales, and I recommend these proposals to you and to the people of Wales.
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. A gaf fi hefyd ddiolch i'r Cynulliad am y cyfle i fod yr Aelod cyntaf i ddefnyddio'r darn newydd hwn o fusnes? Hoffwn ddiolch hefyd i fy nghyn-reolwr swyddfa, Mark Major, a ddaeth â'r pwnc i fy sylw pan ddeuthum yn Aelod Cynulliad. Dechreuodd ymgyrch chwe blynedd gyda datganiad barn yn 2011, yn gofyn am gefnogaeth i wneud addysgu sgiliau achub bywyd brys yn orfodol yn yr ysgol ac yna cafwyd dadl fer pan siaradodd yr Ysgrifennydd addysg presennol, yn ogystal ag aelodau o Blaid Cymru a'r Blaid Lafur, o'i blaid. Daeth cefnogaeth gan bob plaid yn y pedwerydd Cynulliad, ac mae'n ymddangos bod pob plaid yn y pumed Cynulliad hefyd yn cefnogi'r egwyddor. Hoffwn ddiolch i bawb ohonoch sydd eisoes wedi cyflwyno eich cefnogaeth i'r cynnig heddiw sy'n ymwneud yn ei hanfod â'r hawl i gael hyfforddiant i achub bywyd. Wrth wneud hynny, rydych yn cefnogi egwyddor y bu ymladd drosti ers nifer o flynyddoedd. Mae cyflwyno sgiliau achub bywyd gorfodol ar gwricwlwm yr ysgol yn rhywbeth a gefnogir gan Sefydliad Prydeinig y Galon, Ambiwlans Sant Ioan, y Groes Goch Brydeinig, ond hefyd y Coleg Parafeddygon, Coleg Brenhinol y Meddygon, Perygl Cardiaidd ymhlith yr Ifanc, Addysg Gardiofasgwlaidd Prydain, Y Gymdeithas Addysg Gorfforol, Undeb Cenedlaethol yr Athrawon - yn Lloegr, beth bynnag - Syndrom Marwolaeth Arhythmig Sydyn y DU, Coleg Brenhinol y Nyrsys, Cynghrair Arrhythmia y DU, Cymdeithas Feddygol Prydain, Gwasanaeth Ambiwlans Cymru, y Gymdeithas Ffibriliad Atrïaidd, Coleg Brenhinol Meddygaeth Frys, y Gymdeithas Frenhinol er Achub Bywydau a llawer o rai eraill. Rwyf wedi cael negeseuon e-bost o gefnogaeth a chefnogaeth ar y cyfryngau cymdeithasol i hyn dros y 48 awr ddiwethaf. Mae wedi bod yn gwbl anhygoel. Rydych hefyd yn cefnogi dymuniadau rhieni a phobl ifanc. Canfu Sefydliad Prydeinig y Galon fod 86 y cant o rieni yn y DU eisiau gweld sgiliau argyfwng ac achub bywyd yn cael eu haddysgu yn yr ysgolion - mae'n 88 y cant yng Nghymru mewn gwirionedd. Roedd 78 y cant o'r plant eu hunain yn awyddus i'w ddysgu yn yr ysgol, ac mae 75 y cant o athrawon, sydd eisoes â chwricwlwm gorlawn, eisiau i hyn gael ei ddysgu yn ein hysgolion. Rydych hefyd yn cefnogi dymuniadau'r AS Llafur, Teresa Pearce. Cafodd Ms Pearce gefnogaeth drawsbleidiol i'w Bil ar thema debyg, ond cafodd y ddadl ei therfynu heb bleidlais - proses nad oes gennym mohoni yma - gan yr AS Ceidwadol drwgenwog, Philip Davies. Yn yr ymgyrch barhaus hon, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, tybed pa mor gyfforddus y byddech o fod ar yr un ochr i'r ddadl â'r AS Ceidwadol drwgenwog, Philip Davies. Felly, pam deddfwriaeth? Wel, yn gyntaf oll, rwyf am longyfarch yr holl ysgolion sydd wedi rhoi o'u hamser yn wirfoddol ac wedi defnyddio amser ysgol i roi cyfle i'w plant achub bywydau. Hoffwn longyfarch yr elusennau - rwyf wedi crybwyll rhai ohonynt yn barod - y gwasanaethau cyhoeddus, y cadetiaid milwrol, Heartstart a Reactive First Aid, sy'n gallu darparu hyfforddiant o bob math, ac elusennau fel Cariad sy'n helpu i ddarparu diffibrilwyr. Pob clod i Shoctober, Defibruary, Save a Life September, Staying Alive - mae pawb ohonoch yn cofio Vinnie Jones yn hwnnw - diffibrilwyr mewn hen flychau ffôn, a'r holl ymgyrchoedd ymwybyddiaeth. Mae hwn yn waith ardderchog a hebddo, buasai ein cyfraddau goroesi gwael ar gyfer trawiad ar y galon y tu allan i amgylchedd yr ysbyty hyd yn oed yn waeth. Bydd tua 90 y cant o'r dioddefwyr hyn yn marw - a mwy o bosibl, yn ôl un ffynhonnell - ac er y bydd gan y rhan fwyaf o'r dioddefwyr hyn rywun gyda hwy pan fyddant yn dioddef, byddant yn dal i farw. Heb gylchrediad gwaed, chwe munud yn unig y mae'n ei gymryd i ddioddefwr gael niwed parhaol i'r ymennydd. Ar ôl 10 munud, mae'n rhy hwyr yn y bôn. Felly, oni ddylai plentyn dyfu i fyny gyda'r hawl i wybod sut i ymyrryd - sut i helpu i achub bywyd? Yn 2013, 20 y cant yn unig o blant Cymru a Lloegr a oedd wedi cael o leiaf un wers sgiliau achub bywyd yn ystod eu taith ysgol ar ei hyd, ac nid yw un wers yn agos at fod yn ddigon yn hyn o beth. Gallwch ddweud hynny am mai 4 y cant ohonynt yn unig a oedd â'r hyder i ymyrryd - 4 y cant. Eto i gyd, dywedodd 94 y cant o blant uwchradd y byddent yn fwy hyderus pe baent yn cael hyfforddiant wedi'i ddiweddaru yn gymharol gyson. Rwy'n dymuno'r gorau i gynllun cardiaidd y Llywodraeth, ond os na allwch warantu cyfranogiad y boblogaeth gyfan, bydd cymhwysedd a hyder, cam un y cynllun, yn methu oherwydd natur ar hap digwyddiadau o ataliad ar y galon. Ac ar y sail eich bod yn dweud ein bod yn dal i fod angen ymarfer mapio i wybod pwy sy'n darparu adfywio cardio-pwlmonaidd (CPR); fod yn rhaid i chi fynd i dudalen dau ar Google i ddod yn agos at restr y gwasanaeth ambiwlans o ddiffibrilwyr; a bod newidiadau cwricwlwm Donaldson beth amser i ffwrdd, nid wyf yn meddwl bod gennym amser i ewyllys da a gwaith da roi'r newid hwnnw i ni ar lefel y boblogaeth gyfan. Bydd 8,000 o bobl yng Nghymru yn cael trawiad ar y galon y tu allan i leoliad ysbyty eleni, a bydd y rhan fwyaf ohonynt yn marw oherwydd anwybodaeth neu ofn y rhai a fydd yno pan fydd yn digwydd. Felly, pwy sydd â'r niferoedd, y cymhwysedd a'r hyder ar lefel y boblogaeth gyfan mewn sgiliau cymorth cyntaf - ac nid yw'n golygu CPR yn unig? Wel, gadewch i ni gael golwg ar y sgriniau: Norwy, 95 y cant; Yr Almaen, 80 y cant; Awstria, 80 y cant; Gwlad yr Iâ, 75 y cant. Mae Ffrainc hyd yn oed ar 40 y cant. Nawr, sut y digwyddodd hynny? Oherwydd rhwymedigaeth ddeddfwriaethol i gael hyfforddiant sgiliau achub bywyd gorfodol ar wahanol gyfnodau ym mywydau'r dinasyddion hynny. Yn Nenmarc a'r Swistir, ni allwch gael eich trwydded yrru hyd yn oed oni bai eich bod wedi gwneud yr hyfforddiant hwn. A pha wledydd sydd â'r gyfradd uchaf o bobl yn goroesi trawiad ar y galon y tu allan i'r ysbyty? Mae rhai ohonynt ymhell dros 50 y cant - sy'n cymharu â'n 3 i 10 y cant ni. Wel, rwy'n siwr y gallwch ddyfalu. Nid yw'r cynnig deddfwriaethol hwn yn ymwneud yn unig ag ataliad ar y galon, CPR a diffibrilwyr; rwyf am i'n plant dyfu i fyny gyda'r hyder i ymyrryd pan fyddant yn gweld person sy'n gwaedu, yn anymwybodol, yn cael ffit, yn tagu, sydd wedi cael sioc drydanol, neu'n dangos arwyddion eu bod yn boddi. Mae cynllun newydd yn y rhan dlotaf o ogledd Bangladesh wedi gweithredu ar y pwynt olaf hwn, ac mae plant naw oed yno yn gorfod dysgu CPR a sut i achub bywyd mewn achos posibl o foddi. Ac argymhellion yw'r rhain, wrth gwrs. Nid ydynt wedi cael eu datblygu'n llawn, ond yn sicr nid ydynt yn anodd na'n ddrud i'w cyflwyno. Nid ydynt yn gwrthdaro ag awgrym yr Athro Donaldson y dylid defnyddio deddfwriaeth i ddiffinio set eang o ddyletswyddau. Gallech ddechrau ymgynghori ar y rhain yfory. Felly, Aelodau, rwy'n credu bod hwn yn achlysur lle y mae model Norwy yn bendant yn briodol i Gymru, ac rwy'n argymell y cynigion hyn i chi ac i bobl Cymru.