English: Well, they haven't been discontinued, because there will be more frequent services on those lines, as we've said. For example, if you look at Maesteg - . [ Interruption.] If you look at Maesteg, for example - . If you look at Maesteg, for example - . [ Interruption.] If you want to ask me about trains, then good luck. If you look at Maesteg, for example, a twice-hourly service is what is being proposed, whether that means through to Cardiff or that means one to Bridgend and one to Cardiff. Of course, the problem with Maesteg is that the main line electrification has gone west of Cardiff. That adds significantly to the cost of electrifying to Maesteg. Originally, when we looked at the metro plans, the UK Government had said it would electrify as far as Swansea. Now that has disappeared. But let's be quite clear about this. Two things to emphasise here: firstly, whatever is the method of traction, there will be a better service and a more frequent service; and secondly, to suggest what was suggested last week, that you can divorce Cardiff from the rest of the Valleys lines, clearly doesn't work. Many, many people come to work in Cardiff from the Valleys. That means when they get to Cardiff it's hugely important that they can get around Cardiff properly, and get around Cardiff in the easiest way possible, and that means, of course, integrating the system in Cardiff with those of the Valleys lines. Again, let me be absolutely clear: there will be more frequent services; there will be better services.
Welsh: Wel, dydyn nhw ddim wedi eu terfynu, oherwydd bydd gwasanaethau amlach ar y rheilffyrdd hynny, fel yr ydym ni wedi ei ddweud. Er enghraifft, os edrychwch chi ar Faesteg - . [ Torri ar draws.] Os edrychwch chi ar Faesteg, er enghraifft - . Os edrychwch chi ar Faesteg, er enghraifft - . [ Torri ar draws.] Os ydych chi eisiau fy holi am drenau, yna pob lwc. Os edrychwch chi ar Faesteg, er enghraifft, gwasanaeth ddwywaith yr awr yw'r hyn sy'n cael ei gynnig, pa un a yw hynny'n golygu yr holl ffordd i Gaerdydd neu'n golygu un i Ben-y-bont ar Ogwr ac un i Gaerdydd. Wrth gwrs, y broblem gyda Maesteg yw bod trydaneiddio'r prif reilffordd wedi diflannu i'r gorllewin o Gaerdydd. Mae hynny'n ychwanegu'n sylweddol at y gost o drydaneiddio i Faesteg. Yn wreiddiol, pan edrychasom ar y cynlluniau metro, roedd Llywodraeth y DU wedi dweud y byddai'n trydaneiddio cyn belled ag Abertawe. Mae hynny wedi diflannu erbyn hyn. Ond gadewch i ni fod yn gwbl eglur am hyn. Mae dau beth i'w pwysleisio yn y fan yma: yn gyntaf, beth bynnag yw'r dull tynnu, bydd gwasanaeth gwell a gwasanaeth amlach; ac yn ail, mae'n amlwg nad yw awgrymu'r hyn a awgrymwyd yr wythnos diwethaf, y gallwch chi wahanu Caerdydd oddi wrth gweddill rheilffyrdd y Cymoedd, yn gweithio. Mae llawer iawn o bobl yn dod i weithio i Gaerdydd o'r Cymoedd. Mae hynny'n golygu pan eu bod yn cyrraedd Caerdydd ei bod hi'n bwysig iawn eu bod nhw'n gallu symud o gwmpas Caerdydd yn briodol, a symud o gwmpas Caerdydd yn y ffordd rwyddaf bosibl, ac mae hynny'n golygu, wrth gwrs, integreiddio'r system yng Nghaerdydd gyda rheilffyrdd y Cymoedd. Unwaith eto, gadewch i mi fod yn gwbl eglur: bydd gwasanaethau amlach; bydd gwasanaethau gwell.