English: I think the Member highlights very well the sheer complexity of the difficulties that face us. I would certainly not want to criticise anyone who helps a homeless person have a tent that stops them sleeping in a doorway, because it can make the difference between life and death. However, clearly that is not a sustainable solution. The whole purpose of the housing first approach is to be able to offer people secure permanent accommodation and not have to have them go in and out of night shelters and so on, which, clearly, is only a minor step up from sleeping in the street. Having said that, the night shelters are a very important part of the mix. We are helping many of the charities that run the night shelters with things like more security and better living space, if you like, but one size doesn't fit all. For some people, that will just not be an acceptable place to go - for others, it will be a lifeline. So, you know - . The Member highlights the complexity, and what I've said in my statement and in answering questions across the floor is: it is quite clear to me, and as clear as the nose on your face, really, that each individual will have a different set of needs, and you need to design a different set of interventions for that individual. The idea that you can have some kind of universal service that fits everybody - clearly, that just does not work. As I've said very clearly, I'm absolutely convinced that a suitable accommodation offer for the Deputy Presiding Officer, for example, might not be anything that I would find suitable accommodation, because we are very different individuals. We need to be able to recognise the humanity of the person who's homeless and get them the sort of home that they would be able to sustain long term, and that has a huge range of complexities associated with it. I'd just like to say two other things, though. The first is, just to be clear, that not all people who are rough-sleepers have substance abuse problems - some of them do and some of them don't, so that's not a universal characteristic either. And that isn't the problem in every night shelter either, so the problem is that it's very complex and looks very different depending on where you shine your searchlight.
Welsh: Mae'r Aelod yn tynnu sylw'n dda iawn, rwy'n credu, at y cymhlethdodau mawr yn yr anawsterau sy'n ein hwynebu. Ni fyddwn yn sicr yn dymuno beirniadu unrhyw un sy'n helpu drwy roi pabell i unigolyn digartref er mwyn ei rwystro rhag gorfod cysgu wrth ddrws, oherwydd gall fod yn wahaniaeth rhwng bywyd a marwolaeth i hwnnw. Fodd bynnag, mae'n amlwg nad yw hynny'n ateb cynaliadwy. Holl ddiben dull Tai yn Gyntaf yw rhoi'r gallu i gynnig llety parhaol diogel i bobl ac nid eu gorfodi i fynd i mewn ac allan o'r llochesi nos ac ati sydd, yn amlwg, ond yn un cam bychan oddi wrth gysgu ar y stryd. Wedi dweud hynny, mae'r llochesi nos yn rhan bwysig iawn o'r gymysgedd. Rydym yn helpu llawer o'r elusennau sy'n rhedeg llochesi nos gyda phethau fel diogelwch gwell a lle gwell i fyw, fel petai, ond nid yw'r un peth yn gweithio i bawb. I rai, ni fydd hwnnw'n lle derbyniol i fynd iddo - i eraill, bydd yn fodd i fyw. Felly, wyddoch chi - . Mae'r Aelod yn tynnu sylw at y cymhlethdodau, a'r hyn yr wyf i wedi ei ddweud yn fy natganiad i ac wrth ateb cwestiynau ar draws y llawr yw: mae'n amlwg iawn i mi, ac mor blaen ag y gallai hi fod, mewn gwirionedd, fod gan bob unigolyn wahanol set o anghenion, a bydd yn rhaid dylunio set unigryw o ymyriadau ar gyfer yr unigolyn hwnnw. Mae'r syniad y gallwch chi gael rhyw fath o wasanaeth cyffredinol a fydd yn gweddu i bawb - yn amlwg, ni fyddai hynny'n gweithio. Ac fel y dywedais yn eglur, rwy'n berffaith siŵr na fyddai cynnig o lety addas i'r Dirprwy Lywydd, er enghraifft, yn rhywbeth y byddwn i yn ei ystyried yn llety addas efallai, gan ein bod yn unigolion gwahanol iawn i'n gilydd. Mae angen i ni allu cydnabod dynoliaeth yr unigolyn sy'n ddigartref a rhoi'r math o gartref iddo y gall ei gynnal yn y tymor hir, ac mae amrywiaeth enfawr o gymhlethdodau yn gysylltiedig â hynny. Hoffwn ddweud dau beth arall, serch hynny. Y cyntaf yw, er eglurder, nad oes gan bob person sy'n cysgu allan broblemau camddefnyddio sylweddau - mae gan rai ac nid oes gan eraill, felly nid yw honno'n nodwedd gyffredinol chwaith. Nid yw honno'n broblem ym mhob lloches nos ychwaith, felly y broblem yw ei bod yn hynod gymhleth ac yn ymddangos yn wahanol iawn yn dibynnu ar ble y byddwch chi'n chwilio.