English: Thank you, Jane. We have discussions with Dŵr Cymru, and indeed Hafren Dyfrdwy, all the time. We have a very close working relationship with NRW and our water authorities, for obvious reasons, and as I was just saying in response to John, we're currently conducting a number of reviews about who has what responsibility to do what in this area. We've got a co-operation agreement investigation going on, and we've got three others also being looked at, to make sure that the regulation that we have in place is effective and efficient, and I think it probably is obvious. You don't have four reviews if something is effective and efficient, and clearly it isn't, so we hope that the reviews will give us a place to hang our hat in terms of reform of that system. I also speak to Ofwat and the UK Government very regularly about this. How the water companies remunerate their employees is not a matter for the Welsh Government. What is a matter for us is to make sure that Ofwat, under direction from the UK Government as well as ourselves, puts in place a financial plan that allows those companies to have the right staff in the right place, including enforcement staff, but much more importantly to have the right kind of capital investment to correct the kinds of problems that we've got that we've just been discussing in the whole of this event, particularly the combined storm overflows and the misconnection of housing estates, and indeed, actually, commercial premises as well, although nobody has mentioned that, because those are really big issues. And it is absolutely fundamental, particularly for Dŵr Cymru, that that financial plan allows a not-for-profit company, because the previous plan did not; it disadvantaged them because they weren't paying dividends to shareholders. So, we really need that to be taken on board, and we do have those conversations very frequently.
Welsh: Diolch, Jane. Rydym yn cael trafodaethau gyda Dŵr Cymru, ac yn wir Hafren Dyfrdwy, trwy'r amser. Mae gennym ni berthynas weithio agos iawn gyda Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru a'n hawdurdodau dŵr, am resymau amlwg, ac fel yr oeddwn i'n dweud gynnau fach mewn ymateb i John, rydym ni ar hyn o bryd yn cynnal nifer o adolygiadau ynglŷn â phwy sydd â pha gyfrifoldeb i wneud beth yn y maes hwn. Mae gennym ni ymchwiliad cytundeb cydweithredu ar y gweill, ac mae gennym ni dri arall hefyd yn cael eu hystyried, i wneud yn siŵr bod y rheoliadau sydd gennym ni ar waith yn effeithiol ac effeithlon, ac rwy'n credu ei fod yn amlwg mae'n debyg. Does gennych chi ddim pedwar adolygiad os yw rhywbeth yn effeithiol ac effeithlon, ac yn amlwg dyw e ddim, felly rydym ni'n gobeithio y bydd yr adolygiadau yn rhoi man cychwyn i ni o ran diwygio'r system honno. Rwyf hefyd yn siarad gydag Ofwat a Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig yn rheolaidd iawn am hyn. Nid mater i Lywodraeth Cymru yw'r ffordd mae'r cwmnïau dŵr yn talu eu gweithwyr. Yr hyn sy'n fater i ni yw gwneud yn siŵr bod Ofwat, o dan gyfarwyddyd Llywodraeth y DU yn ogystal â ninnau, yn rhoi cynllun ariannol ar waith sy'n caniatáu i'r cwmnïau hynny gael y staff cywir yn y lle cywir, gan gynnwys staff gorfodi, ond yn bwysicach o lawer i gael y math cywir o fuddsoddiad cyfalaf i gywiro'r mathau o broblemau sydd gennym ni ac yr ydym ni newydd fod yn trafod yn hyn o beth, yn enwedig y gorlifoedd storm cyfunol a cham-gysylltu ystadau tai, ac yn wir, mewn gwirionedd, safleoedd masnachol hefyd, er nad oes neb wedi sôn am hynny, oherwydd mae'r rheini'n faterion mawr iawn. Ac mae'n gwbl sylfaenol, yn enwedig i Dŵr Cymru, fod y cynllun ariannol hwnnw'n caniatáu cwmni nid-er-elw, oherwydd nid oedd y cynllun blaenorol; roedd yn eu rhoi dan anfantais oherwydd nad oedden nhw'n talu difidend i gyfranddalwyr. Felly, mae gwir angen ystyried hynny, ac rydym ni yn cael y sgyrsiau hynny'n aml iawn.