English: Can I ask about the isolation period first of all, Minister? I was a bit disappointed that we didn't have anything on that today in the statement. We know that the UK Health Security Agency has found that most people are not infectious after five days and we know that the UK Government has reduced the period from seven to five days, albeit that you have to have a negative on the fifth day. Clearly, there are huge advantages of reducing that period for public services, particularly health services that are under huge pressure, as they are so very much here in Wales. So, can you give us an indication of when you will be making an announcement on reducing that isolation period and your considerations on that? Clearly, at some point, there'll be no isolation period. We're not there yet, but we will be at that point at some point in time. Given that the omicron variant has subsided so quickly, you stated in your statement today that it is welcome news, and I agree that it's very welcome news, of course, in that regard. But we have seen case rates plummeting about as quickly as they arrived, which is good news, but, in that regard, I would ask, and you would expect me to ask, about the Government's timing on lifting restrictions, which are economically damaging - and we know that, of course - and, I would suggest, clinically unnecessary to have restrictions, particularly on hospitality and sporting events. Can I ask you why you did not end restrictions at the same time? They were introduced at the same time, so why were they not lifted at the same time, given that the case rates plummeted as quickly as they came in? And you would expect me to ask this question, Minister, but do you believe that the restrictions that were put in place were an overreaction? I expect that you expected me to ask that question. I am concerned, Minister, about some of the messaging given to the Senedd and the Welsh public. Last Tuesday, and I'm quoting you here, you said this: 'We are in the middle of the storm at the moment; now is not the time to talk about dismantling the protection measures we've put in place.' That was just last Tuesday. So, we couldn't even talk about them last Tuesday, and then, two days later, the First Minister announced the rolling back of some of the restrictions. We know, as well, that hospitalisation rates are nearly a third of the delta variant this time last year, and death rates stood at one nineteenth, compared to the same period of time. So, this is why I ask the question about the overreaction and your words in this regard. The First Minister said last month that, in January, half of the UK population could be ill with COVID. Of course, that has not happened and we're not out of January yet, but no-one is suggesting that that is the case now. But, of course, the First Minister stated that based on the data presented to him and based on the modelling, so I understand that. But can I ask, the weight that you apply when making decisions to modelling, particularly modelling on the worst-case scenarios, what analysis does the Government do of the modelling after the event in terms of checking for accuracy against actually what happened? And do you think that it's time to have a wider review of how modelling is conducted and, more importantly, the weight that is attached to it against the other balances that have to be taken into account as well? I looked back at your comments last week, Minister, when I asked you about your plans in terms of living with COVID for the future, and you were a little shocked that I was asking those questions and suggesting that this wasn't the time to be talking about these things. But, of course, I know that the UK Labour Party has also discussed living with COVID. So, I'm hoping I can ask you this question in a way that gets a clearer answer this week: what are your plans in terms of living with COVID? The public does not want to be under the threat of having restrictions winter after winter, and you won't want that either, Minister, so can we have a little bit more information about your plans for living with COVID? And finally, Minister, the last question I will ask you is about the fastest way to get a vaccine certification. You said that the digital NHS COVID pass service remains the fastest way to get proof of vaccine certification. That's not the case for many people. Three constituents of mine - one in Edinburgh - can't get the pass, can't get a 'fully vaccinated' certificate, because one vaccination was in Newtown, one was in Edinburgh, and a similar position for somebody in France. And a constituent last week was not able to get their certification because they're taking their young child, for health reasons, for urgent health treatment, to another part of Europe, and it's the last thing the family needed that they are not able to get their vaccination certification due to apps not working in conjunction with other countries. So, can I ask you, in that regard, why are we lagging behind on the Welsh NHS app, and when can we expect to be in a position where these issues are resolved? Can you give us a date on that particular issue and when we're going to see the app working as it should be, Minister?
Welsh: A gaf i ofyn am y cyfnod ynysu yn gyntaf, Gweinidog? Roeddwn i wedi fy siomi braidd nad oedd gennym ni ddim ar hynny yn y datganiad heddiw. Rydym ni'n gwybod bod Asiantaeth Diogelwch Iechyd y DU wedi canfod nad yw'r rhan fwyaf o bobl yn heintus ar ôl pum diwrnod ac rydym ni'n gwybod bod Llywodraeth y DU wedi lleihau'r cyfnod o saith i bum diwrnod, er bod yn rhaid i chi gael prawf negatif ar y pumed diwrnod. Yn amlwg, mae manteision enfawr o leihau'r cyfnod hwnnw ar gyfer gwasanaethau cyhoeddus, yn enwedig gwasanaethau iechyd sydd o dan bwysau aruthrol, fel y maen nhw yn fawr iawn yma yng Nghymru. Felly, a allwch chi roi syniad i ni pryd y byddwch chi'n gwneud cyhoeddiad ar leihau'r cyfnod ynysu hwnnw a'ch ystyriaethau ynghylch hynny? Yn amlwg, ar ryw adeg, ni fydd unrhyw gyfnod ynysu. Nid ydym ni yno eto, ond byddwn ni yn cyrraedd y pwynt hwnnw rywbryd. O ystyried bod yr amrywiolyn omicron wedi cilio mor gyflym, fe wnaethoch chi ddweud yn eich datganiad heddiw ei fod yn newyddion i'w groesawu, ac rwy'n cytuno ei fod yn newyddion i'w groesawu'n fawr, wrth gwrs, yn hynny o beth. Ond rydym ni wedi gweld cyfraddau achosion yn plymio mor gyflym ag y gwnaethon nhw gyrraedd, sydd yn newyddion da, ond, yn hynny o beth, rwy'n gofyn, a byddech chi'n disgwyl i mi ofyn, am amseriad y Llywodraeth ar godi cyfyngiadau, sy'n niweidiol yn economaidd - ac rydym ni'n gwybod, wrth gwrs - ac rwy'n awgrymu, bod cael cyfyngiadau yn ddiangen yn glinigol, yn enwedig ar ddigwyddiadau lletygarwch a chwaraeon. A gaf i ofyn i chi pam na wnaethoch chi ddod â'r cyfyngiadau i ben ar yr un pryd? Cawson nhw eu cyflwyno ar yr un pryd, felly pam na chawson nhw eu dileu ar yr un pryd, o gofio bod y cyfraddau achosion wedi plymio mor gyflym ag y daethon nhw? A byddech chi'n disgwyl i mi ofyn y cwestiwn hwn, Gweinidog, ond a ydych chi'n credu bod y cyfyngiadau a gafodd eu rhoi ar waith yn orymateb? Rwy'n tybio eich bod chi wedi disgwyl i mi ofyn y cwestiwn hwnnw. Rwy'n pryderu, Gweinidog, ynghylch rhai o'r negeseuon y mae'r Senedd a'r cyhoedd yng Nghymru yn eu cael. Ddydd Mawrth diwethaf, ac rwy'n eich dyfynnu chi yn y fan yma, fe wnaethoch chi ddweud hyn: 'Rydym ni yng nghanol y storm ar hyn o bryd; nid nawr yw'r amser i siarad am ddod i ben â'r mesurau amddiffyn yr ydym ni wedi eu rhoi ar waith.' Dim ond dydd Mawrth diwethaf oedd hynny. Felly, nid oeddem ni'n cael siarad amdanyn nhw hyd yn oed ddydd Mawrth diwethaf, ac yna, ddeuddydd yn ddiweddarach, cyhoeddodd y Prif Weinidog y byddai rhai o'r cyfyngiadau'n dod i ben. Rydym ni'n gwybod hefyd fod cyfraddau derbyniadau i'r ysbyty bron i draean o'r amrywiolyn delta yr adeg hon y llynedd, a bod cyfraddau marwolaeth yn un rhan mewn pedair ar bymtheg, o'i gymharu â'r un cyfnod o amser. Felly, dyma pam yr wyf i'n gofyn y cwestiwn am y gorymateb a'ch geiriau chi yn hyn o beth. Dywedodd y Prif Weinidog fis diwethaf, ym mis Ionawr, y gallai hanner poblogaeth y DU fod yn sâl â COVID. Wrth gwrs, nid yw hynny wedi digwydd ac nid ydym ni wedi dod i ddiwedd mis Ionawr eto, ond nid oes neb yn awgrymu bod hynny'n wir bellach. Ond, wrth gwrs, dywedodd y Prif Weinidog hynny ar sail y data a oedd wedi eu cyflwyno iddo ef ac ar sail y modelu, felly rwy'n deall hynny. Ond a gaf i ofyn, y pwysau yr ydych chi'n ei roi ar fodelu wrth wneud penderfyniadau, yn enwedig modelu'r senarios gwaethaf, pa ddadansoddiad y mae'r Llywodraeth yn ei gynnal o'r modelu ar ôl y digwyddiad o ran cadarnhau cywirdeb o'i gymharu â'r hyn a ddigwyddodd mewn gwirionedd? Ac a ydych chi'n credu ei bod yn bryd cael adolygiad ehangach o sut y mae modelu yn cael ei gynnal ac, yn bwysicach, y pwysau sydd ynghlwm wrtho o'i gymharu â'r ystyriaethau eraill y mae'n rhaid eu cydbwyso hefyd? Edrychais yn ôl ar eich sylwadau yr wythnos diwethaf, Gweinidog, pan ofynnais i chi am eich cynlluniau o ran byw â COVID yn y dyfodol, ac roeddech chi wedi synnu braidd fy mod i'n gofyn y cwestiynau hynny ac yn awgrymu nad dyma'r amser i siarad am y pethau hyn. Ond, wrth gwrs, rwy'n gwybod bod Plaid Lafur y DU wedi trafod byw â COVID hefyd. Felly, rwy'n gobeithio y caf i ofyn y cwestiwn hwn i chi mewn ffordd sy'n cael ateb cliriach yr wythnos hon: beth yw eich cynlluniau o ran byw â COVID? Nid yw'r cyhoedd yn dymuno bod dan fygythiad cyfyngiadau o un gaeaf i'r nesaf, ac ni fyddwch chi'n dymuno hynny chwaith, Gweinidog, felly a gawn ni ychydig mwy o wybodaeth am eich cynlluniau ar gyfer byw â COVID? Ac yn olaf, Gweinidog, mae'r cwestiwn olaf y byddaf i'n ei ofyn i chi yn ymwneud â'r ffordd gyflymaf o gael tystysgrif brechu. Fe wnaethoch chi ddweud mai gwasanaeth pàs COVID digidol y GIG yw'r ffordd gyflymaf o hyd o gael prawf o ardystiad brechlyn. Nid yw hynny'n wir i lawer o bobl. Ni all tri o fy etholwr i - un yng Nghaeredin - gael y pàs, gael tystysgrif 'wedi'i frechu'n llawn', oherwydd cafodd un brechiad yn y Drenewydd, ac un yng Nghaeredin, ac mae sefyllfa debyg i rywun yn Ffrainc. Ac nid oedd etholwr yr wythnos diwethaf yn gallu cael ei ardystio oherwydd ei fod yn mynd â'i blentyn ifanc, am resymau iechyd, ar gyfer triniaeth iechyd brys, i ran arall o Ewrop, a'r peth olaf yr oedd ei angen ar y teulu oedd eu bod yn methu â chael eu hardystiad brechu oherwydd nad yw apiau yn gweithio ar y cyd â gwledydd eraill. Felly, a gaf i ofyn i chi, yn hynny o beth, pam ydym ni ar ei hôl hi o ran ap GIG Cymru, a phryd y gallwn ni ddisgwyl bod mewn sefyllfa lle caiff y materion hyn eu datrys? A allwch chi roi dyddiad i ni ar y mater penodol hwnnw a phryd y byddwn ni'n gweld yr ap yn gweithio fel y dylai fod, Gweinidog?