English: I'd like to thank the Cabinet Secretary for his statement today. In your statement, Cabinet Secretary, you highlight some welcome examples of good practice. What I'd like to know, though, is when could we see the results of all the pilots that were run - good, bad or indifferent - such as the health literacy questionnaire that was run by Cwm Taf, or the patient activation measures that were run in Cardiff and Vale, because I think we can learn lessons from all the pilots. Is there anywhere we can go to have a look at them so that we can evaluate each and every one of them? Could you also confirm that you are reviewing best-practice examples not just within Wales but whether you're looking at other countries, either other home nations or within Europe? What are you using to benchmark these best practices so that something we think is good really is absolutely the best it can possibly be? How are you monitoring against developments in good practice elsewhere? My third question, Cabinet Secretary, is: I'm a little bit concerned by your comment about the 9 per cent of people who do not turn up for follow-up appointments. That is obviously totally unacceptable, and I agree with you on that, but you mention that your way of dealing with it will be to stop offering so many follow-up appointments. Could you please clarify whether you already know the type of person who's likely to be in that nine per cent? Have they not been turning up because actually we've just been far too extravagant and offered them follow-up appointments when it wasn't clinically necessary, or are they just people who've not turned up because they feel better and so they can't be bothered? Because what I wouldn't like to see is by refusing or by deciding to offer fewer appointments, we're throwing out the baby with the bathwater and the people who do need follow-up appointments are not given those. Virtual clinics: really welcomed step forward. I think that's a great idea, but could you please tell us what you're doing to ensure that poor broadband or poor IT knowledge does not stop those who need to use them or could use them from using and being part of a virtual clinic? And finally, Cabinet Secretary, one co-designing planned care event was held in 2015, and there were two planned for 2016, but search as I may, I cannot find the information that says whether or not those events went ahead. Could you please tell me if they did go ahead, and is this an ongoing programme? Are there more of these co-designing planned care events in the pipeline? Is this what forms Peter Lewis's thinking on delivering the model that we have here before us? Because I think it's very important to be able to invest all of our stakeholders with real authority and real ability to take part in delivering truly integrated services. Thank you.
Welsh: Hoffwn ddiolch i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet am ei ddatganiad heddiw. Yn eich datganiad, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, rydych chi'n tynnu sylw at rai enghreifftiau o arfer da sydd i'w croesawu. Fodd bynnag, yr hyn yr hoffwn ei wybod yw pryd yr ydym yn mynd i allu gweld canlyniadau'r holl gynlluniau peilot a gynhaliwyd - yn dda, yn wael neu'n weddol - megis yr holiadur llythrennedd iechyd gan Gwm Taf, neu'r mesurau ysgogi cleifion yng Nghaerdydd a'r Fro, oherwydd rwy'n credu y gallwn ddysgu gwersi o'r holl gynlluniau peilot. A oes unrhyw le y gallwn fynd i edrych arnynt fel y gallwn werthuso pob un ohonynt? A allech chi hefyd gadarnhau eich bod chi'n adolygu enghreifftiau o arfer gorau nid yn unig yng Nghymru, ond a ydych chi'n edrych ar wledydd eraill, naill ai gwledydd eraill y DU neu wledydd Ewrop? Beth ydych chi'n ei ddefnyddio i feincnodi'r arferion gorau hyn fel bod rhywbeth sy'n dda yn ein barn ni gystal ag y gall fod? Sut ydych chi'n monitro yn erbyn datblygiadau mewn arferion da mewn mannau eraill? Fy nhrydydd cwestiwn, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, yw hwn: rwyf ychydig yn bryderus am eich sylwadau am y 9 y cant o bobl nad ydynt yn mynd i apwyntiadau dilynol. Mae hynny'n amlwg yn gwbl annerbyniol, ac rwy'n cytuno â chi ar hynny, ond rydych yn sôn mai eich ffordd ci o ymdrin â hyn yw rhoi'r gorau i gynnig cymaint o apwyntiadau dilynol. A allech chi egluro a ydych eisoes yn adnabod y math o berson sy'n debygol o fod yn un o'r naw y cant hwnnw? Onid yw methu apwyntiadau yn digwydd oherwydd ein bod ni wedi bod yn rhy afradlon, gan gynnig apwyntiadau dilynol iddyn nhw pan nad oedd hynny'n angenrheidiol yn glinigol? Neu a ydyn nhw'n bobl sy'n methu apwyntiadau oherwydd eu bod yn teimlo'n well ac felly does dim pwynt mynd i'r drafferth? Yr hyn na hoffwn ei weld yn digwydd wrth wrthod neu benderfynu cynnig llai o apwyntiadau yw ein bod yn taflu'r llo ac yn cadw'r brych ac nad yw'r bobl sydd angen yr apwyntiadau dilynol yn eu cael nhw. Clinigau rhithwir: cam ymlaen i'w groesawu yn fawr iawn. Rwy'n credu bod hynny'n syniad gwych, ond a allech chi ddweud wrthym beth yr ydych chi'n ei wneud i sicrhau nad yw band eang gwael neu ddiffyg gwybodaeth TG yn rhwystr i'r sawl sydd angen eu defnyddio rhag eu defnyddio a bod yn rhan o glinig rhithwir? Ac yn olaf, cynhaliodd Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, un digwyddiad cyd-ddylunio ar gyfer gofal wedi'i gynllunio yn 2015, ac roedd dau ar y gweill ar gyfer 2016. Ond er imi chwilio, ni allaf ddod o hyd i'r wybodaeth sy'n dangos a gynhaliwyd y digwyddiadau hynny ai peidio. A allech chi ddweud wrthyf a gawsant eu cynnal neu beidio, ac a yw hon yn rhaglen barhaus? A oes mwy o'r digwyddiadau cyd-ddylunio ar gyfer gofal wedi'i gynllunio ar y gweill? Ai dyma sy'n ffurfio syniadau Peter Lewis am gyflwyno'r model sydd gennym yma ger ein bron? Oherwydd rwy'n credu ei bod yn bwysig iawn sicrhau bod gan bob un o'n rhanddeiliaid yr awdurdod a'r gallu gwirioneddol i gymryd rhan yn y gwaith o ddarparu gwasanaethau hollol integredig. Diolch.