English: Yes. I think the Member may have already seen Natural Resources Wales's report, and it does emphasise the flood protection benefits that tidal lagoon projects could bring, and that's going to be really, really important. The Hendry review observes that tidal lagoons can play a cost-effective part in the UK energy mix, and I think that was a real breakthrough, because there was some questioning about the cost-effectiveness of this technology - it's a long-term one, but viewed in the long term, it is clearly seen to be cost-effective. The case for this as a pathfinder project is described in the review as 'very strong', and then likely to lead to cost-competitive larger lagoons in other areas, such as north Wales, but potentially also Cardiff and Newport, as well as in other sites around the UK. So, this is really, really important. The thoroughness of the Hendry review goes into calls for the UK Government to adopt a clear strategic approach to tidal energy, similar to offshore wind. So, I think we need to see that. He also calls for a new body, a tidal power authority, that would act as an arm's-length agency, so that the maximum advantage could be taken of this technology. So, we see the extent, really, of what is before us. Can I just turn, finally, to the advantages for Wales? I won't talk specifically - I think other Members will talk about the Swansea project. But if other projects follow in the most likely sites, we could see a £20 billion level of investment from the private sector, over 33,000 jobs, potentially, in construction and manufacturing for Wales, and an annual benefit in our GVA, if these projects go ahead, of £1.4 billion. It is remarkable. Wales was once the Kuwait of coal; we could now be the world leader in tidal energy. Let's grasp the challenge.
Welsh: Ydw. Rwy'n meddwl bod yr Aelod efallai eisoes wedi gweld adroddiad Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru, ac mae'n pwysleisio'r buddion o ran amddiffyn rhag llifogydd a allai ddod gyda phrosiectau morlynnoedd llanw, ac mae hynny'n mynd i fod yn bwysig iawn, iawn. Mae adolygiad Hendry yn nodi y gall morlynnoedd llanw chwarae rhan gost-effeithiol yng nghymysgedd ynni y DU, ac rwy'n meddwl bod hynny'n torri tir newydd gwirioneddol, oherwydd roedd rhai cwestiynau ynghylch cost-effeithiolrwydd y dechnoleg hon - mae'n un hirdymor, ond wrth edrych ar yr hirdymor, mae'n dod yn amlwg bod hyn yn gost-effeithiol. Mae'r adroddiad yn nodi bod yr achos o blaid hyn fel prosiect braenaru yn 'gryf iawn', a'i fod yna yn debygol o arwain at forlynnoedd mawr cost-gystadleuol mewn ardaloedd eraill, fel y gogledd, ond hefyd o bosibl Caerdydd a Chasnewydd, yn ogystal â safleoedd eraill o amgylch y DU. Felly, mae hyn yn bwysig iawn, iawn. Mae trylwyredd adolygiad Hendry yn cynnwys galwadau ar Lywodraeth y DU i fabwysiadu dull strategol clir ar gyfer ynni llanw, yn debyg i ynni gwynt ar y môr. Felly, rwy'n meddwl bod angen inni weld hynny. Mae hefyd yn galw am gorff newydd, awdurdod ynni llanw, a fyddai'n gweithredu fel asiantaeth hyd braich, er mwyn gallu manteisio i'r eithaf ar y dechnoleg hon. Felly, rydym yn gweld cwmpas, a dweud y gwir, yr hyn sydd o'n blaenau. A gaf i droi, yn olaf, at y buddion i Gymru? Ni wnaf siarad yn benodol - rwy'n meddwl y bydd Aelodau eraill yn sôn am brosiect Abertawe. Ond pe byddai prosiectau eraill yn dilyn yn y safleoedd mwyaf tebygol, gallem weld buddsoddiad gwerth £20 biliwn gan y sector preifat, dros 33,000 o swyddi, o bosibl, mewn adeiladu a gweithgynhyrchu ar gyfer Cymru, a budd blynyddol yn ein GYC, os aiff y prosiectau hyn yn eu blaenau, o £ 1.4 biliwn. Mae'n rhyfeddol. Unwaith, Cymru oedd Kuwait y byd glo; nawr, gallem fod yn arweinydd y byd ym maes ynni llanw. Gadewch inni groesawu'r her.