techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: It's three weeks since GPs across Wales urged you to prohibit the use of second homes and to tighten up enforcement rules in order to safeguard public health, but you have not acted to date. Surely by this point we do need action, given that we are approaching the Whitsun holiday and in light of the change in rules and emphasis in England. So, I would like to ask you what further measures you will put in place in order to ensure that the Welsh regulations are respected. I would also like to know what your decision is in light of the discussions that you are having with the police forces and local authorities - and you mentioned that the last time I urged you for stricter enforcement. Do you agree with the four police forces that we do need to increase the fines imposed for travelling unnecessarily?
Welsh: Mae hi'n dair wythnos ers i feddygon teulu ar draws Cymru erfyn arnoch chi i wahardd y defnydd o ail gartrefi ac i dynhau pwerau gorfodi er mwyn amddiffyn iechyd y cyhoedd, ond dydych chi ddim wedi gweithredu hyd yma. Does bosib, erbyn hyn, fod angen gweithredu, a ninnau ar drothwy'r Sulgwyn ac yn sgil y newidiadau i'r rheolau a'r pwyslais yn Lloegr. Felly hoffwn i ofyn pa fesurau pellach y byddwch chi'n eu rhoi ar waith i sicrhau bod rheoliadau Cymru yn cael eu parchu. A hoffwn i wybod hefyd beth ydy'ch penderfyniad yn sgil y trafodaethau rydych chi'n eu cael efo'r heddlu a'r awdurdodau lleol - gwnaethoch chi sôn am hynny y tro diwethaf i mi bwyso arnoch chi am orfodaeth lymach. A ydych chi yn cytuno efo'r pedwar llu heddlu fod angen cynyddu'r dirwyon sy'n cael eu gosod am deithio diangen?
English: First Minister, during your press conference on Monday, and again in your statement today, you've touched upon some of the important factors that helped to determine your decision making in Wales, including the health inequalities in our population. Now I know that some people see an opportunity for change in our current circumstances, so, for example, delivering on active travel plans or more gardening to produce your own fruit and vegetables, and I wouldn't disagree with any of that, but I believe there's a real danger that without ongoing action by both the UK and Welsh Governments there's a further and a real risk of this virus creating greater health inequalities, caused by ever more deeply embedded poverty and debt. So, can I ask you, First Minister, if these concerns form part of the Government's thinking and planning about the future, and what do you think will be the first post-COVID steps needed to start addressing some of these inequalities?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, yn ystod eich cynhadledd i'r wasg ddydd Llun, ac eto yn eich datganiad heddiw, rydych chi wedi crybwyll rhai o'r ffactorau pwysig a helpodd i benderfynu eich proses o wneud penderfyniadau yng Nghymru, gan gynnwys yr anghydraddoldebau iechyd yn ein poblogaeth. Nawr rwy'n gwybod bod rhai pobl yn gweld cyfle i newid yn ein hamgylchiadau presennol, felly, er enghraifft, cyflawni cynlluniau teithio llesol neu fwy o arddio i gynhyrchu eich ffrwythau a'ch llysiau eich hunan, ac ni fyddwn i'n anghytuno â dim o hynny, ond rwy'n credu bod perygl gwirioneddol y bydd y feirws hwn yn creu mwy o anghydraddoldebau iechyd, wedi eu hachosi gan dlodi a dyled sydd wedi ymwreiddio'n ddyfnach fyth, heb gamau parhaus gan Lywodraethau Cymru a'r DU. Felly, a gaf i ofyn i chi, Prif Weinidog, a yw'r pryderon hyn yn rhan o feddylfryd a gwaith cynllunio'r Llywodraeth ynglŷn â'r dyfodol, a beth ydych chi'n ei gredu fydd y camau ôl-COVID cyntaf y bydd eu hangen i ddechrau mynd i'r afael â rhai o'r anghydraddoldebau hyn?
English: First Minister, in your statement you mentioned people who don't feel particularly safe at home all the time, and my question is prompted by my worries about them and an increasing number of constituents contacting me about their mental health, and questions arising from Welsh Government guidance about staying at home. Just to be clear, this isn't about differences between England and Wales but Welsh Government guidance itself, reflected, actually, in your confusing comments made a few days ago. When you publish it on Friday, will the scientific evidence on which you rely explicitly highlight the evidence that supports that a gathering of two people from different households is safe, or that it's safe for two people from different households to come across each in a library, but not for two people from different households, where there have been no symptoms for weeks, going for a socially distanced walk together deliberately, as opposed to the chance meeting you referred to earlier? And will it also highlight the evidence that says that it's safe to drive and encounter anyone at a garden centre, subject to the social distancing, but not safe to drive - you can walk or cycle, but not drive - to your nearest lake or beach to go fishing by yourself? Or can you confirm that 'local' does in fact mean 'nearest' in those circumstances?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, soniasoch yn eich datganiad am bobl nad ydyn nhw'n teimlo'n arbennig o ddiogel gartref drwy'r amser, ac mae fy nghwestiwn i'n cael ei gymell gan fy mhryderon amdanyn nhw a nifer gynyddol o etholwyr sy'n cysylltu â mi ynglŷn â'u hiechyd meddwl, a chwestiynau sy'n codi o ganllawiau Llywodraeth Cymru ynghylch aros gartref. Dim ond i fod yn eglur, nid yw hyn yn ymwneud â gwahaniaethau rhwng Cymru a Lloegr ond canllawiau Llywodraeth Cymru ei hun, a adlewyrchwyd, a dweud y gwir, yn eich sylwadau dryslyd a wnaed ychydig ddyddiau yn ôl. Pan fyddwch chi'n ei chyhoeddi ddydd Gwener, a fydd y dystiolaeth wyddonol yr ydych chi'n dibynnu arni'n llwyr yn tynnu sylw penodol at y dystiolaeth sy'n ategu'r ffaith bod cynulliad o ddau o bobl o wahanol aelwydydd yn ddiogel, neu ei bod yn ddiogel i ddau o bobl o wahanol aelwydydd ddigwydd gweld ei gilydd mewn llyfrgell, ond nid i ddau o bobl o wahanol aelwydydd, lle na fu unrhyw symptomau ers wythnosau, fynd am dro gyda'i gilydd yn fwriadol gan gadw pellter cymdeithasol, yn hytrach na'r cyfarfod ar hap y cyfeiriasoch ato'n gynharach? Ac a fydd hefyd yn tynnu sylw at y dystiolaeth sy'n dweud ei bod hi'n ddiogel i yrru a chyfarfod gydag unrhyw un mewn canolfan arddio, yn amodol ar gadw pellter cymdeithasol, ond nad yw'n ddiogel gyrru - cewch gerdded neu feicio, ond nid gyrru - i'ch llyn neu'ch traeth agosaf i fynd i bysgota ar eich pen eich hun? Neu a allwch chi gadarnhau mai ystyr 'lleol' mewn gwirionedd yw 'agosaf' o dan yr amgylchiadau hynny?
English: Carers have been woefully underpaid and underappreciated for a long time, and your policy to give £500 to carers is welcome, but it doesn't go far enough. All care home workers, including cooks and cleaners, should be entitled to that payment because they are at risk as well. Unpaid carers deserve to be recognised, in my view, too. So, will you commit to recognising everyone who's a carer, or who works in a care home setting, with this one-off payment? And, as this one-off payment doesn't address the ongoing low pay of carers, will you agree to do the same as the SNP Government has done in Scotland, and give all social care staff an immediate 3.3 per cent pay increase?
Welsh: Mae gofalwyr wedi cael eu talu a'u gwerthfawrogi'n druenus o annigonol ers amser maith, ac mae eich polisi i roi £500 i ofalwyr i'w groesawu, ond nid yw'n mynd yn ddigon pell. Dylai fod gan bob gweithiwr cartref gofal, gan gynnwys cogyddion a glanhawyr, hawl i gael y taliad hwnnw gan eu bod hwythau mewn perygl hefyd. Mae gofalwyr di-dâl yn haeddu cael eu cydnabod hefyd, yn fy marn i. Felly, a wnewch chi ymrwymo i gydnabod pawb sy'n ofalwr, neu sy'n gweithio mewn cartref gofal, gyda'r taliad untro hwn? A chan nad yw'r taliad untro hwn yn mynd i'r afael â chyflog isel parhaus gofalwyr, a wnewch chi gytuno i wneud yr un fath ag y gwnaeth Llywodraeth yr SNP yn yr Alban, a rhoi codiad cyflog o 3.3 y cant ar unwaith i'r holl staff gofal cymdeithasol?
English: I very much welcome the £500 that we've given to care workers, because they are very much in the front line of risk, looking after the most vulnerable people living in very close circumstances. I also very much welcome the mobile testing units that have been launched to enable residents and staff in care homes to get tested, to see whether they've got the virus. But I'm sure you'll acknowledge that one mobile testing unit for the whole of Cardiff and the Vale is insufficient to cover all the care homes and all those vulnerable senior citizens who we need to protect. So I wanted to probe your plans for enabling us to massively increase the numbers of testing units. One report talks about 94 teams working seven days a week. It would appear that we can't rely on health personnel unless we want to see all the other important health interventions they deliver abandoned, and I wouldn't want to see that. So I wondered what consideration has been given to recruiting other people. In your statement, you paid tribute to the voluntary sector, and I'm aware that, in Sheffield, the pilot for testing and tracing was led by a retired director of public health; it also involves volunteers in supporting the tracing aspect of it.
Welsh: Rwy'n croesawu'n fawr iawn y £500 yr ydym ni wedi ei roi i weithwyr gofal, oherwydd maen nhw'n sicr ar y rheng flaen o ran risg, yn gofalu am y bobl fwyaf agored i niwed yn byw mewn amgylchiadau agos iawn. Rwyf i hefyd yn croesawu'n fawr yr unedau profi symudol a lansiwyd i alluogi preswylwyr a staff mewn cartrefi gofal i gael eu profi, i weld a yw'r feirws ganddyn nhw. Ond rwy'n siŵr y gwnewch chi gydnabod nad yw un uned brofi symudol ar gyfer Caerdydd a'r Fro gyfan yn ddigonol ar gyfer yr holl gartrefi gofal a'r holl bobl hŷn agored i niwed hynny y mae angen i ni eu diogelu. Felly roeddwn i eisiau eich holi am eich cynlluniau ar gyfer ein galluogi i gynyddu yn enfawr nifer yr unedau profi. Mae un adroddiad yn sôn am 94 o dimau yn gweithio saith diwrnod yr wythnos. Mae'n ymddangos na allwn ni ddibynnu ar bersonél iechyd oni bai ein bod ni eisiau gweld yr holl ymyraethau iechyd pwysig eraill y maen nhw'n eu darparu yn cael eu rhoi o'r neilltu, ac ni fyddwn i eisiau gweld hynny. Felly, roeddwn i'n meddwl tybed pa ystyriaeth a roddwyd i recriwtio pobl eraill. Yn eich datganiad, fe wnaethoch chi dalu teyrnged i'r sector gwirfoddol, ac rwy'n ymwybodol, yn Sheffield, yr arweiniwyd yr arbrawf ar gyfer profi ac olrhain gan gyfarwyddwr iechyd y cyhoedd sydd wedi ymddeol; mae hefyd yn cynnwys gwirfoddolwyr yn cynorthwyo'r agwedd olrhain ar y broses.
English: So I wondered what the Government's strategy for involving a whole army of new people, including volunteers, in the mass testing campaign required to take control of the spread of COVID-19 might be.
Welsh: Felly, roeddwn i'n meddwl tybed beth allai strategaeth y Llywodraeth ar gyfer cynnwys byddin gyfan o bobl newydd, gan gynnwys gwirfoddolwyr, yn yr ymgyrch profi torfol sydd ei hangen i gymryd rheolaeth dros ymlediad COVID-19 fod.
English: Llywydd, apologies that I struggled to hear a little bit of what the Member was saying, but I think the thrust of his argument is that we are 'foolish', I think was the word he used, to focus on the R value and that we should be bold. Well, let me tell him what being bold would mean: the R value in Wales, we think, at the moment is 0.8, and even at 0.8 we have to anticipate that over the next three months another 800 Welsh citizens will die because of the virus. If the R number were to rise to 1.1 - so that's a tiny number of one-tenths of one - if it was to creep up to 1.1, the number of deaths over that three-month period would be 7,200. So, the price of being bold is the death of 6,500 people in Wales. I see that the Member doesn't agree, but I'm not making it up. I am giving him the very best figures that our epidemiologists and public health physicians offer. And this is a figure that will be agreed right across the United Kingdom. At 0.8, 800 people very, very sadly may die over the next three months. At 1.1 - just that tiny increase - it's 7,200. It's easy to sit here and be bold. I'm not going to be willing to be bold when 6,500 of our fellow citizens would have to bear the brunt of that boldness.
Welsh: Llywydd, ymddiheuriadau fy mod i wedi ei chael hi'n anodd clywed ychydig o'r hyn yr oedd yr Aelod yn ei ddweud, ond rwy'n credu mai byrdwn ei ddadl yw ein bod ni'n 'ffôl', rwy'n credu oedd y gair a ddefnyddiodd, i ganolbwyntio ar y gwerth R ac y dylem ni fod yn feiddgar. Wel, gadewch i mi ddweud wrtho beth fyddai bod yn feiddgar yn ei olygu: rydym ni'n credu mai 0.8 yw'r gwerth R yng Nghymru ar hyn o bryd, a hyd yn oed ar 0.8 mae'n rhaid i ni ragweld y bydd 800 o ddinasyddion ychwanegol yng Nghymru yn marw oherwydd y feirws dros y tri mis nesaf. Pe byddai'r rhif R yn codi i 1.1 - felly mae hynny'n nifer fach iawn o ddegfed rhan o un - pe byddai'n cynyddu i 1.1, byddai nifer y marwolaethau dros y cyfnod hwnnw o dri mis yn 7,200. Felly pris bod yn feiddgar yw marwolaeth 6,500 o bobl yng Nghymru. Rwy'n gweld nad yw'r Aelod yn cytuno, ond nid fi sy'n dweud hyn. Rwyf i'n rhoi iddo'r ffigurau gorau posibl y mae ein epidemiolegwyr a'n meddygon iechyd cyhoeddus yn eu cynnig. Ac mae hwn yn ffigur y cytunir arno ar draws y Deyrnas Unedig. Ar 0.8, gallai 800 o bobl, yn anffodus dros ben, farw dros y tri mis nesaf. Ar 1.1 - dim ond y cynnydd bach iawn hwnnw - mae'n 7,200. Mae'n hawdd eistedd yn y fan yma a bod yn feiddgar. Nid wyf i'n barod i fod yn feiddgar pan fyddai'n rhaid i 6,500 o'n cyd-ddinasyddion ddwyn baich y beiddgarwch hwnnw.
English: Before I call Huw Irranca-Davies, can I just make sure that Members have their microphone close to their mouths when they're speaking? I've only just noticed that perhaps Neil Hamilton's wasn't at that point, but it was just about possible to hear. So, just a reminder to all Members, and - who did I say? Yes, Huw Irranca-Davies.
Welsh: Cyn i mi alw ar Huw Irranca-Davies, a gaf i wneud yn siŵr bod yr Aelodau yn rhoi eu meicroffonau yn agos at eu cegau pan eu bod nhw'n siarad? Dim ond newydd sylwi wyf i efallai nad oedd hynny'n wir am feicroffon Neil Hamilton y tro yna, ond roedd hi fwy neu lai yn bosibl clywed. Felly, dim ond i atgoffa yr holl Aelodau, a - phwy ddywedais i? Ie, Huw Irranca-Davies.
English: Could I ask you, First Minister, for your emerging thoughts on the work being taken forward by the Counsel General on rebuilding post COVD-19, and the similar work being developed by some of the big city mayors in England on the theme of 'building back better'? In this terrible ongoing tragedy of coronavirus, people have also seen, first-hand, the benefits of cleaner air, lower traffic, and more liveable streets and communities in places that were previously choked with pollution and congestion. And under lockdown, people have seen first-hand the quality-of-life benefits of vibrant, green spaces, as compared to tarmac and concrete, and more space and freedom to walk and cycle rather than to drive. So, First Minister, can I ask what measures can be put into place right now, and going forward as the restrictions may be eased, to enable more and more people to get around for work and recreation by walking and cycling, especially while the capacity of public transport remains constrained, so that we can avoid a calamitous return to traffic congestion, air and noise pollution and the associated health impacts, and so that we can respond to the very real underlying climate change emergency?
Welsh: A gaf i ofyn i chi, Prif Weinidog, am eich syniadau sy'n dod i'r amlwg am y gwaith sy'n cael ei wneud gan y Cwnsler Cyffredinol ar ailadeiladu ar ôl COVID-19, a'r gwaith tebyg sy'n cael ei ddatblygu gan rai o feiri'r dinasoedd mawr yn Lloegr ar y thema 'adeiladu'n ôl yn well'? Yn y drychineb barhaus ofnadwy hon o coronafeirws, mae pobl hefyd wedi gweld, yn uniongyrchol, fanteision aer glanach, llai o draffig, a strydoedd a chymunedau haws byw ynddyn nhw mewn mannau a oedd wedi eu tagu gan lygredd a thagfeydd gynt. Ac o dan y cyfyngiadau symud, mae pobl wedi gweld drostyn nhw eu hunain fanteision ansawdd bywyd mannau gwyrdd, bywiog, o'u cymharu â tharmac a choncrid, a mwy o le a rhyddid i gerdded a beicio yn hytrach na gyrru. Felly, Prif Weinidog, a gaf i ofyn pa fesurau y gellir eu rhoi ar waith nawr, ac yn y dyfodol wrth i'r cyfyngiadau gael eu llacio, i alluogi mwy a mwy o bobl i fynd o le i le ar gyfer gwaith a hamdden trwy gerdded a beicio, yn enwedig tra bo capasiti cludiant cyhoeddus yn parhau i fod yn gyfyngedig, fel y gallwn ni osgoi dychweliad trychinebus i dagfeydd traffig, llygredd aer a sŵn a'r effeithiau iechyd cysylltiedig, ac fel y gallwn ni ymateb i argyfwng sylfaenol gwirioneddol y newid yn yr hinsawdd?
English: Llywydd, I thank Huw Irranca-Davies for that. Can I just begin by admiring the tribute that I can see behind him to people from the Llynfi valley who lost their lives in fighting fascism during the 1930s? He will have seen the statement that my colleague Lee Waters put out last week, inviting expressions of interest by 21 May from all local authorities to take advantage of the fact that roads are nowhere near as busy as they otherwise would be to try to lock in some of the advantages that Huw Irranca-Davies has referred to. We've all at least benefited during this crisis from the declines in air pollution and noise pollution, and we really don't want to simply go back to recreating all those difficulties if we can avoid them, because of the health impacts and the impact on climate change that we knew they had. In that call for expressions of interest from local authorities, backed up by money from the Welsh Government, we're looking to local authorities to bring forward proposals for footway widening, temporary cycle lanes, speed restrictions, bus infrastructure improvements and other things and that local authorities, in an imaginative way, as the call for proposals makes clear, use the moment we have to try to lock into our infrastructure some of the advantages that we've seen from being a major reduction in traffic over recent weeks, with the benefits that we're getting from it now and want to be able to go on seeing those benefits in the future.
Welsh: Llywydd, diolchaf i Huw Irranca-Davies am hynna. A gaf i ddechrau drwy edmygu'r deyrnged y gallaf i ei gweld y tu ôl iddo i bobl o gwm Llynfi a gollodd eu bywydau wrth ymladd ffasgiaeth yn ystod y 1930au? Bydd wedi gweld y datganiad a gyhoeddwyd gan fy nghydweithiwr Lee Waters yr wythnos diwethaf, yn gwahodd datganiadau o ddiddordeb erbyn 21 Mai gan bob awdurdod lleol i fanteisio ar y ffaith nad yw ffyrdd yn agos at fod mor brysur ag y bydden nhw fel arall i geisio cadw rhai o'r manteision y mae Huw Irranca-Davies wedi cyfeirio atyn nhw. Rydym ni i gyd o leiaf wedi elwa yn ystod yr argyfwng hwn ar y gostyngiadau i lygredd aer a llygredd sŵn, a dydym ni wir ddim eisiau mynd yn ôl i ail-greu'r holl anawsterau hynny os gallwn ni eu hosgoi, oherwydd yr effeithiau ar iechyd a'r effaith ar y newid yn yr hinsawdd yr oeddem ni'n gwybod yr oedden nhw'n eu cael. Yn yr alwad honno am ddatganiadau o ddiddordeb gan awdurdodau lleol, gyda chefnogaeth arian gan Lywodraeth Cymru, rydym ni'n disgwyl i awdurdodau lleol gyflwyno cynigion ar gyfer lledu llwybrau troed, lonydd beicio dros dro, cyfyngiadau cyflymder, gwelliannau i seilwaith bysiau a phethau eraill a bod awdurdodau lleol, mewn modd llawn dychymyg, fel y mae'r galwad am gynigion yn ei wneud yn eglur, yn defnyddio'r ennyd sydd gennym ni i geisio cynnwys yn barhaol yn ein seilwaith rai o'r manteision yr ydym ni wedi eu gweld o gael gostyngiad mawr i draffig yn ystod yr wythnosau diwethaf, gyda'r manteision yr ydym ni'n eu cael ohono nawr ac yn dymuno gallu parhau i weld y manteision hynny yn y dyfodol.
English: Can I ask, First Minister - ? I listened very carefully to your answer to Andrew R.T. Davies before, but, I have to say, I'm not very satisfied with it. It's very clear, from the guidance that prevailed here in Wales on Saturday that, going for a walk and having a picnic cannot be considered to be exercise and is not intended to be a reasonable excuse. You changed the guidance on Monday, and many people will think that that might be because of the fact that the health Minister was photographed sitting on the park bench having a picnic with his family over the weekend. Now, it looks to the public that it's one rule for the health Minister and another rule for them. So, don't you agree with me that Vaughan Gething has had his chips? And when are you going to remove him from the park bench and put him on the subs bench, where he belongs?
Welsh: A gaf i ofyn, Prif Weinidog - ? Gwrandewais yn astud iawn ar eich ateb i Andrew R.T. Davies yn gynharach, ond, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, nid wyf yn fodlon iawn ag ef. Mae'n amlwg iawn, o'r canllawiau a oedd ar waith yma yng Nghymru ddydd Sadwrn na ellir ystyried bod mynd am dro a chael picnic yn ymarfer corff ac na fwriedir iddo fod yn esgus rhesymol. Newidiwyd y canllawiau gennych chi ddydd Llun, a bydd llawer o bobl yn meddwl efallai mai'r rheswm am hynny yw'r ffaith y tynnwyd llun y Gweinidog iechyd yn eistedd ar fainc y parc yn cael picnic gyda'i deulu dros y penwythnos. Nawr, mae'n edrych i'r cyhoedd fel bod un rheol i'r Gweinidog iechyd a rheol arall iddyn nhw. Felly, onid ydych chi'n cytuno â mi bod Vaughan Gething wedi cael ei tsips? A phryd ydych chi'n mynd i'w dynnu oddi ar y fainc yn y parc a'i roi ar fainc yr eilyddion, lle y dylai fod?
English: Llywydd, I've already said, I'm not going to be drawn into that sort of distasteful personal attack on anybody. A brief stop to allow a child to eat is not a picnic in anybody's language, and just for his information, before he tries to spread the sort of slur that he tried in his question, the decisions that the Welsh Government made on the measures that we were going to change were made on Thursday of last week. They were made in a Cabinet meeting that was properly and officially minuted; it had nothing to do with any incident that he is referring to and he should stop trying to imply that it did.
Welsh: Llywydd, rwyf i eisoes wedi dweud, nid wyf i'n mynd i gael fy nhynnu i mewn i'r math hwnnw o ymosodiad personol di-chwaeth ar neb. Nid picnic yw saib byr i ganiatáu i blentyn fwyta yn iaith neb, a dim ond iddo gael gwybod, cyn iddo geisio lledaenu'r math o sarhad a geisiodd yn ei gwestiwn, gwnaed y penderfyniadau a wnaeth Llywodraeth Cymru ar y mesurau yr oeddem ni'n mynd i'w newid ddydd Iau yr wythnos diwethaf. Fe'u gwnaed mewn cyfarfod Cabinet a gofnodwyd yn briodol ac yn swyddogol; nid oedd a wnelo dim ag unrhyw ddigwyddiad y mae e'n cyfeirio ato a dylai roi'r gorau i geisio awgrymu hynny.