English: Thank you, Minister. It is a bit concerning that, if you don't have that baseline information available, how do we know that these projects that the sustainable farming scheme is going to introduce are actually benefiting carbon sequestration, because we don't have the baseline figure to work from? So, while there are carbon calculators out there that every farm can do, you and I both know that there are varying carbon calculators out there that offer very different calculations. So, I'd be really keen to stress that there needs to be a baseline figure here, where we know that a sustainable farming scheme introduced is delivering the benefits that we're looking to achieve within the agricultural sector. But, sticking with the agriculture Bill and the sustainable farming scheme, I want to draw your attention, as Peredur did earlier, to tenant and common land farmers. Having recently met with the representatives and attended NFU Cymru's policy launch for common land at the winter fair, coupled with the strong evidence from both tenant farmers and common land farmers presented at my committee, I'm left with some serious concerns about the lack of consideration given to these farm types by Welsh Government policy. A tenancy working group was formed, although its first meeting was only a couple of weeks ago, and last month I asked you for a specific group for common land farmers, but I've heard no progress on this - two examples of how both are seen as somewhat of an afterthought by the Welsh Government. Minister, both tenant and common land farmers make up a big proportion of active farmers here in Wales. If the agriculture Bill and the sustainable farming scheme fail to work for them, it will have huge consequences on the viability of Welsh family farms across our country. So, what guarantees can you give that neither tenant farmers nor common land farmers will be negatively impacted by the introduction of the agriculture Bill and specifically the sustainable farming scheme? Diolch.
Welsh: Diolch, Weinidog. Mae'n peri pryder, os nad oes gennych chi'r wybodaeth llinell sylfaen honno ar gael, sut y gwyddom fod y prosiectau y mae'r cynllun ffermio cynaliadwy yn mynd i'w cyflwyno o fudd i atafaelu carbon mewn gwirionedd, gan nad oes gennym y ffigur sylfaenol i weithio ohono? Felly, er bod carboniaduron allan yno y gall pob fferm eu defnyddio, rydych chi a minnau'n gwybod fod carboniaduron amrywiol allan yno sy'n cynnig cyfrifiadau gwahanol iawn. Felly, rwy'n awyddus iawn i bwysleisio bod angen ffigur sylfaenol yma, lle gwyddom fod cynllun ffermio cynaliadwy a gyflwynwyd yn sicrhau'r manteision rydym yn ceisio'u cyflawni o fewn y sector amaethyddol. Ond gan gadw at y Bil amaeth a'r cynllun ffermio cynaliadwy, rwyf am dynnu eich sylw, fel y gwnaeth Peredur yn gynharach, at ffermwyr tenant a ffermwyr tir comin. Ar ôl cyfarfod â'r cynrychiolwyr yn ddiweddar a mynychu lansiad polisi NFU Cymru ar gyfer tir comin yn y ffair aeaf, ynghyd â thystiolaeth gref gan ffermwyr tenant a ffermwyr tir comin a gyflwynwyd yn fy mhwyllgor, rwy'n pryderu'n fawr am y diffyg ystyriaeth i'r mathau hyn o ffermydd ym mholisi Llywodraeth Cymru. Ffurfiwyd gweithgor tenantiaeth, er mai dim ond ychydig wythnosau'n ôl y cafodd ei gyfarfod cyntaf, a'r mis diwethaf gofynnais i chi am grŵp penodol ar gyfer ffermwyr tir comin, ond nid wyf wedi clywed am unrhyw gynnydd ar hynny - dwy enghraifft o'r modd y mae'r ddau fath o ffermio'n cael eu gweld fel ôl-ystyriaeth braidd gan Lywodraeth Cymru. Weinidog, ffermwyr tenant a ffermwyr tir comin yw cyfran fawr o'r ffermwyr actif yma yng Nghymru. Os bydd y Bil amaeth a'r cynllun ffermio cynaliadwy yn methu gweithio iddynt hwy, bydd yn arwain at ganlyniadau enfawr i hyfywedd ffermydd teuluol Cymreig ledled ein gwlad. Felly, pa sicrwydd y gallwch ei roi na fydd ffermwyr tenant na ffermwyr tir comin yn cael eu heffeithio'n negyddol yn sgil cyflwyno'r Bil amaeth a'r cynllun ffermio cynaliadwy yn benodol? Diolch.