English: I feel great sympathy towards the individuals working in the NHS who have been affected in this way and also, of course, those who are working outside the NHS in Wales who also have been affected. I do, however, think that the Velindre hospital trust that runs the radiation protection service based in my constituency of Cardiff North has responded appropriately to this incident, which was, of course, beyond their control. I do feel reassured that, certainly in the case of the Velindre staff who have been affected, enough support has been given to the 530 individuals affected. I know that as well as having the letter - individual letters sent to the individuals involved - there has also been the opportunity for individual consultation with all those people affected where they can ask any particular questions and can raise any queries. So, would the Cabinet Secretary agree that the other health boards that are in the process of informing their members of staff that this breach may have occurred - that individual consultation is also offered, because I think that is a way of reassuring, so that they are able to have face-to-face meetings? Also, I think that it is important, obviously, that individuals are informed as swiftly as possible, but it's also very important that the right individuals, at the right addresses and in the right trusts are informed. With the thousands who have been affected by this, it's absolutely essential that there is time to establish that you are not, for example, contacting somebody who may have died in the interim, but you are actually contacting somebody who is actually there, working in the trust, and has been affected by this. So, there is bound to be an inevitable time lag while all these details are looked into. Would the Cabinet Secretary agree that it is essential that care is taken over reaching the individuals involved, but that it should be done as quickly as possible?
Welsh: Rwy'n cydymdeimlo'n fawr â'r unigolion sy'n gweithio yn y GIG yr effeithiwyd arnynt yn y ffordd hon a hefyd, wrth gwrs, â'r rhai yr effeithiwyd arnynt sy'n gweithio y tu allan i'r GIG yng Nghymru. Rwyf, fodd bynnag, yn credu bod ymddiriedolaeth ysbyty Felindre sy'n rhedeg y gwasanaeth diogelu rhag ymbelydredd yn fy etholaeth i, sef Gogledd Caerdydd wedi ymateb yn briodol i'r digwyddiad hwn, a oedd, wrth gwrs, y tu hwnt i'w rheolaeth. Rwy'n dawel fy meddwl, yn sicr yn achos staff Felindre y mae hyn wedi effeithio arnynt, bod digon o gefnogaeth wedi ei rhoi i'r 530 o unigolion yr effeithiwyd arnynt. Gwn yn ogystal â chael y llythyr - anfonwyd llythyrau unigol at yr unigolion dan sylw - y bu hefyd gyfle i ymgynghori'n unigol â'r holl bobl yr effeithiwyd arnynt lle gallant ofyn unrhyw gwestiynau penodol a chodi unrhyw ymholiadau. Felly, a fyddai Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn cytuno bod y byrddau iechyd eraill sydd yn y broses o hysbysu eu haelodau staff y gallai'r achos hwn o danseilio fod wedi digwydd - y dylid cynnig cyfle i ymgynghori'n unigol hefyd, oherwydd credaf ei bod yn ffordd o dawelu meddyliau, fel eu bod yn gallu cael cyfarfodydd wyneb yn wyneb? Hefyd, rwyf yn credu ei bod yn bwysig, yn amlwg, bod unigolion yn cael gwybod cyn gynted ag y bo modd, ond mae hefyd yn bwysig iawn bod yr unigolion cywir, yn y cyfeiriadau cartref cywir ac yn yr ymddiriedolaethau cywir yn cael eu hysbysu. O gofio'r miloedd y mae hyn wedi effeithio arnynt, mae'n gwbl hanfodol bod amser i sefydlu nad ydych, er enghraifft, yn cysylltu â rhywun a allai fod wedi marw yn y cyfamser, ond eich bod yn cysylltu â rhywun sydd yno mewn gwirionedd, yn gweithio yn yr ymddiriedolaeth, ac y mae hyn wedi effeithio arno. Felly, mae'n anochel y bydd oedi wrth edrych ar yr holl fanylion hyn. A yw Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn cytuno ei bod yn hanfodol cymryd gofal wrth ddod i gysylltiad â'r unigolion dan sylw, ond y dylid ei wneud cyn gynted â phosibl?