techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Yes, okay. Finally, when I met the Gypsy young people with you, I think the issue was raised about broadband, and I wondered whether you had anything to comment about that. And then the last question is about Gypsies and Traveller people who live in houses - whether any effort has been made to contact them and to sense what they're feeling.
Welsh: Iawn, ydw. Yn olaf, pan gyfarfûm â'r bobl ifanc Sipsiwn gyda chi, credaf y codwyd y mater ynghylch band eang, ac roeddwn yn meddwl tybed a oedd gennych chi unrhyw beth i'w ddweud am hynny. Ac yna mae'r cwestiwn olaf yn ymwneud â phobl Sipsiwn a Theithwyr sy'n byw mewn tai - a wnaed unrhyw ymdrech i gysylltu â nhw a synhwyro beth y maen nhw'n ei deimlo.
English: And, finally, John Griffiths.
Welsh: Ac, yn olaf, John Griffiths.
English: Yes, that's a very good point that you make there, John Griffiths. We have got some very good examples across Wales of really good engagement with Roma, Gypsy and Traveller communities, and I'm sure we could all name schools across Wales that have done really good work. So, we will be working very hard with colleagues in the education department to make sure we spread that out. And, of course, I just want to say that it's a very central part of our new Donaldson curriculum that people become ethical, informed citizens of the world. So, the Cabinet Secretary for Education and I have ensured that part of that informed citizen theme will be particular modules on Roma, Gypsy and Traveller people. As I said, they are some of the most marginalised and discriminated against people in our society. It's very important that their history is properly understood. We do fund the community cohesion workers to produce myth-busting materials and provide training, in particular to elected members, who have responsibility for putting some of our planning into practice. But I do think it's a very good idea to include media in that and I will certainly take that forward as an excellent suggestion.
Welsh: Ie, rydych chi'n gwneud pwynt da iawn, John Griffiths. Mae gennym ni rai enghreifftiau da iawn ledled Cymru o ymgysylltu da iawn â chymunedau Roma, Sipsiwn a Theithwyr, ac rwy'n siŵr y gallem ni i gyd enwi ysgolion ledled Cymru sydd wedi gwneud gwaith da iawn. Felly, byddwn ni'n gweithio'n galed iawn gyda chydweithwyr yn yr adran addysg i wneud yn siŵr ein bod yn ei ledaenu. Ac, wrth gwrs, rwyf am ddweud ei fod yn rhan ganolog iawn o'n cwricwlwm Donaldson newydd, fod pobl yn dod yn ddinasyddion moesol, deallus o'r byd. Felly, mae Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros addysg a fi wedi sicrhau y bydd modiwlau penodol ar bobl Roma, Sipsiwn a Theithwyr yn rhan o'r thema dinasyddion cytbwys. Fel y dywedais, maent yn rhai o'r bobl sydd fwyaf ar ymylon cymdeithas ac y gwahaniaethir fwyaf yn eu herbyn yn ein cymdeithas. Mae'n bwysig iawn bod eu hanes yn cael ei ddeall yn iawn. Rydym yn ariannu'r gweithwyr cydlyniant cymunedol i gynhyrchu deunyddiau dryllio'r mythau a darparu hyfforddiant, yn arbennig i aelodau etholedig sy'n gyfrifol am roi rhywfaint o'r gwaith cynllunio ar waith. Ond rwy'n meddwl ei bod yn syniad da iawn i gynnwys y cyfryngau yn hynny, a byddaf yn sicr o gyflwyno hynny fel awgrym ardderchog.
English: Item 7 on the agenda this afternoon is a statement by the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Services, 'Brexit - The Risks for the Future of Health and Social Care in Wales'. I call on the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Services, Vaughan Gething.
Welsh: Eitem 7 ar yr agenda y prynhawn yma yw datganiad gan Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Iechyd a Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol, 'Brexit - y risgiau i Ddyfodol Iechyd a Gofal Cymdeithasol yng Nghymru. Galwaf ar Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Iechyd a Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol, Vaughan Gething.
English: Thank you very much. We have had one speaker from each of the parties, and therefore I have three more speakers. So, I'm going to ask you just to give a brief introduction and one or possibly two very short, succinct questions, please. Suzy Davies.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Rydym ni wedi cael un siaradwr o bob un o'r pleidiau, ac felly mae gennyf dri siaradwr arall. Felly, rwy'n mynd i ofyn i chi roi cyflwyniad byr a gofyn o bosib un neu ddau gwestiwn cryno, byr iawn, os gwelwch yn dda. Suzy Davies.
English: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Thank you for your statement. I think it might have been just been a little bit more balanced if you had mentioned the £1.3 billion innovation fund that was mentioned by the UK Government. There are other ways of dealing with some of the challenges that you raised here without being quite so gloomy about it. What I wanted to ask you specifically was: this is 'Brexit - the Risks for the Future of Health and Social Care in Wales' - I can't really see anything in your statement about social care, and I'm hoping that this is not going to be a recurring theme when we're talking about the integration agenda. So, I'm wondering if you can tell me particularly which of the current European programmes to which we might have access after Brexit you might like us to buy into, which might be of advantage for social care innovation and knowledge, and, secondly, whether you can give us some indication of how you've reached the figure you think that we have for the number of EU nationals currently working in social care. I appreciate that, because we don't have registration, that's difficult, but I'm quite curious to know where you got the figure from because a simple extrapolation from a UK figure won't be accurate, bearing in mind that 12 per cent of the EU national care workforce works in London, and only 2 per cent works in the north-east of England, for example. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Diolch i chi am eich datganiad. Rwy'n credu y gallai fod wedi bod ychydig yn fwy cytbwys pe byddech chi wedi sôn am y gronfa arloesi £1.3 biliwn a grybwyllwyd gan Lywodraeth y DU. Mae yna ffyrdd eraill o ymdrin â rhai o'r heriau a grybwyllwyd gennych chi heb fod mor ddigalon am y peth. Yr hyn yr oeddwn i eisiau ei ofyn yn benodol i chi oedd: testun y ddadl hon yw 'Brexit - Y Risgiau i Ddyfodol Iechyd a Gofal Cymdeithasol yng Nghymru' - ni allaf weld unrhyw beth yn eich datganiad mewn gwirionedd ynglŷn â gofal cymdeithasol, ac rwy'n gobeithio na fydd hyn yn thema gyson pan rydym ni'n sôn am yr agenda integreiddio. Felly, meddwl wyf i tybed a allwch chi ddweud wrthyf yn arbennig pa rai o'r rhaglenni Ewropeaidd presennol a allai fod ar gael inni ar ôl Brexit yr hoffech chi efallai i ni ymrwymo iddynt, a allai fod o fantais i feithrin arloesedd a gwybodaeth yn y maes gofal cymdeithasol, ac, yn ail, p'un a allwch chi roi rhyw awgrym o sut gawsoch chi'r ffigur y credwch chi sydd gennym ni ar gyfer nifer gwladolion yr UE sy'n gweithio yn y maes gofal cymdeithasol ar hyn o bryd. Rwy'n sylweddoli, oherwydd nad oes gennym ni gofrestr, bod hynny'n anodd, ond rwy'n eithaf awyddus i wybod o le cawsoch chi'r ffigur oherwydd ni fydd rhagdybiaeth syml yn seiliedig ar ffigur y DU yn gywir, o gofio bod 12 y cant o weithlu gofal cenedlaethol yr UE yn gweithio yn Llundain, a dim ond 2 y cant yn gweithio yng ngogledd-ddwyrain Lloegr, er enghraifft. Diolch.
English: I think the key point from the economy Secretary there is that we expect to be involved in any negotiations in devolved areas, and that's the point: we expect to be involved. We expect to have a say with other Governments within the United Kingdom, and it's about developing a maturing relationship here within the United Kingdom as much as anything else. I would, though, agree - . Look, the point about Liam Fox - when people say, 'You're scaremongering talking about no deal. Of course there'll be a deal', well, actually, he's the Cabinet Minister who was openly talking about the prospect of no deal and the fact that that must be on the table. He's the person who raises the spectre of these deals with other parts of the world that would be wholly unacceptable and damaging to a range of industries here in Wales, and public services, and indeed in our economy. I've also heard comments from not just the President of the United States, but other US officials that he has appointed, on wanting to try and change the nature of the relationship on drug pricing within the United States, and to try and make other people pay more for those commodities. So, I recognise that there are real risks to other arrangements. I've also set out, in answer to other questions here, about the risks that we face if we are not able to secure tariff-free trade and a proper customs union arrangement.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu mai'r pwynt allweddol y mae Ysgrifennydd yr economi yn ei wneud yn y fan yna yw ein bod yn disgwyl bod yn rhan o unrhyw drafodaethau mewn meysydd datganoledig, a dyna'r pwynt: rydym ni'n disgwyl cael ein cynnwys. Rydym ni'n disgwyl cael dweud ein dweud gyda Llywodraethau eraill yn y Deyrnas Unedig, ac mae a wnelo hynny â datblygu perthynas gynyddol aeddfed yma yn y Deyrnas Unedig cymaint ag unrhyw beth arall. Byddwn, fodd bynnag, yn cytuno - . Ylwch, y sylw ynglŷn â Liam Fox - pan fydd pobl yn dweud, 'rydych chi'n codi bwganod yn sôn am ddim bargen. Wrth gwrs bydd bargen', wel, mewn gwirionedd, ef yw'r Gweinidog Cabinet oedd yn sôn yn agored am y posibilrwydd o ddim bargen a'r ffaith bod yn rhaid i hynny fod yn ystyriaeth. Ef yw'r un sy'n codi'r bwganod hyn am fargeinion gyda rhannau eraill o'r byd a fyddai'n gwbl annerbyniol a niweidiol i amrywiaeth o ddiwydiannau yma yng Nghymru, a gwasanaethau cyhoeddus, ac yn wir i'n heconomi. Rwyf hefyd wedi clywed sylwadau gan nid yn unig Arlywydd yr Unol Daleithiau, ond swyddogion eraill yn yr Unol Daleithiau y mae wedi eu penodi, ynglŷn â bod eisiau ceisio newid natur perthynas prisio cyffuriau yn yr Unol Daleithiau, ac i geisio gwneud i bobl eraill dalu mwy am y nwyddau hynny. Felly, rwy'n cydnabod bod risgiau gwirioneddol i drefniadau eraill. Rwyf hefyd wedi amlinellu, mewn ateb i gwestiynau eraill, y risgiau sy'n ein hwynebu os nad ydym ni'n gallu sicrhau masnach di-dariff a threfniant undeb tollau priodol.
English: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Just for the record, between 2017 and 2018, 3,962 nurses from the European economic area left nursing, according to the Nursing and Midwifery Council's register, and they were replaced by just 805. That is the lowest level of recruitment to date, so I think we need to make it clear that this isn't scaremongering - these are actual figures. The good news in this is that those numbers have remained fairly stable in Wales since the talk of Brexit, but I think that we really need to make it clear that these threats are real, they are already starting to happen, and that isn't to mention the effects that it can have on doctors, healthcare support workers, catering staff, housekeepers and porters, because they are all part of keeping the NHS going, and each one of them performs a vital role. So, I suppose my question to you, Cabinet Secretary, is: having managed to hold on to our nursing staff so far, how do you think that we can sustain that going forward, especially if we end up with a 'no deal'?
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Dim ond i ddweud, rhwng 2017 a 2018, gadawodd 3,962 o nyrsys o'r ardal economaidd Ewropeaidd y proffesiwn nyrsio, yn ôl cofrestr y Cyngor Nyrsio a Bydwreigiaeth, ac fe ddaeth dim ond 805 yn eu lle. Dyna'r lefel isaf o recriwtio hyd yma, felly rwy'n credu bod angen inni ei gwneud hi'n glir nad codi bwganod yw hyn - mae'r rhain yn ffigurau go iawn. Y newyddion da yn hyn o beth yw bod y niferoedd hynny wedi aros yn gymharol sefydlog yng Nghymru ers y sôn am Brexit, ond rwy'n credu bod gwir angen inni ei gwneud hi'n glir bod y bygythiadau hyn yn real, maen nhw eisoes yn dechrau digwydd, ac mae hynny heb sôn am yr effeithiau y gallai hynny ei gael ar feddygon, gweithwyr cymorth gofal iechyd, staff arlwyo, staff cadw tŷ a phorthorion, oherwydd maen nhw i gyd yn rhan o gynnal y GIG, ac mae pob un ohonyn nhw yn cyflawni swyddogaeth hanfodol. Felly, fy nghwestiwn i chi, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, mae'n debyg yw: ar ôl llwyddo i ddal gafael ar ein staff nyrsio hyd yma, sut ydych chi'n credu y gallwn ni gynnal hynny yn y dyfodol, yn enwedig os cawn ni 'ddim bargen' yn y pen draw?
English: Diolch, thank you to Mike Hedges for that. You absolutely hit the nail on the head there by saying that where there is consensus and we're all in agreement - and you'd be hard-pressed to find somebody who would disagree that it's a positive thing to plant more trees and that it's something we need to do - but the key thing is how do we get to there. I think you make some really valid and thoughtful contributions in terms of, actually - . I perhaps wouldn't, maybe, use the phrase, 'take the blame'; I think, as you say, perhaps it's for all of us, the onus is on all of us, to press for this and press our own local authorities, as well as myself doing this as the Minister for Environment. But I think you raise some really interesting points in terms of looking at things on a place-by-place basis - so, we know that each urban area in Wales has different needs and priorities - and making sure that we work with local authorities. I'm keen, as I said, to take that forward with Natural Resources Wales through area statements to make sure that they align both with the priorities in terms of green infrastructure and woodland creation, but also in terms of the value of our biodiversity, and making sure that it aligns, obviously, with the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015. So, it's something that - yes, to look at a place-by-place approach I think is the best approach, going forward.
Welsh: Diolch, diolch i Mike Hedges am hynny. Fe wnaethoch chi daro'r hoelen yn union ar ei phen yn y fan yna trwy ddweud bod consensws a'n bod ni i gyd yn cytuno - a chewch chi'n anodd dod o hyd i rywun sy'n anghytuno mai rhywbeth cadarnhaol yw plannu rhagor o goed a'i bod angen inni wneud hynny - ond yr hyn sy'n allweddol yw sut i'w gyflawni. Rwy'n credu eich bod chi'n gwneud sylwadau gwirioneddol ddilys ac ystyrlon o ran, mewn gwirionedd - . Efallai na fyddwn i, efallai, yn defnyddio'r ymadrodd, 'derbyn y bai'; rwy'n credu, fel y dywedwch chi, ei bod i bob un ohonom ni, bod cyfrifoldeb ar bob un ohonom ni, i weithio ar hyn a phwyso ar ein hawdurdodau lleol ein hunain, yn ogystal â mi fy hun yn gwneud hyn fel y Gweinidog dros yr Amgylchedd. Ond rwy'n credu eich bod yn codi pwyntiau diddorol iawn o ran edrych ar bethau fesul lle - felly, rydym yn gwybod bod gan bob ardal drefol yng Nghymru wahanol anghenion a blaenoriaethau - a gwneud yn siŵr ein bod yn gweithio gydag awdurdodau lleol. Rwy'n awyddus, fel y dywedais, i fwrw ymlaen â hynny gyda Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru drwy'r datganiadau ardal i wneud yn siŵr eu bod yn gydnaws â blaenoriaethau o ran seilwaith gwyrdd a chreu coetiroedd, ond hefyd o ran gwerth ein bioamrywiaeth, a gwneud yn siŵr ei bod yn gyson, yn amlwg, â Deddf Llesiant Cenedlaethau'r Dyfodol (Cymru) 2015. Felly, mae'n rhywbeth - ydy, i edrych ar ddull wedi'i seilio ar le rwy'n credu yw'r dull gorau, wrth symud ymlaen.
English: I'm just going to focus on one area and that's going to be the urban tree cover in towns and cities, and support that urban tree management. We all know, don't we, that trees are a valuable habitat for wildlife and pollinators, that they help reduce air pollution, urban flooding and surface temperatures - which would be welcome today - all of which are hugely important to the health and well-being of people living in towns and cities. I'm sure that people in this room who think likewise will share my concerns about Sheffield City Council felling huge numbers of healthy trees in their area. Now, we know that there is 17 per cent urban tree cover and that we need to do something about that. I'm going to ask you, Minister, if you would have a conversation with the Cabinet Secretary responsible for planning so that, when we try to meet our 20,000 new homes target by 2021, we don't go in, simply, to a greenfield site, strip everything out of it, build houses and try to put a bit of grass back or maybe a shrub here and there to satisfy ourselves. Because it doesn't satisfy ourselves. I think we need some radical thinking here when we're talking about building homes, whilst, at the same time, trying to maintain habitats that are there already, rather than - and we've heard it mentioned today - thinking about large-scale devastation, in my opinion, of the urban environment simply to make it easier and cheaper for people to build houses and maximise their profit.
Welsh: Rwyf am ganolbwyntio ar un maes, a hynny fydd gorchudd coed trefol mewn trefi a dinasoedd, ac rwy'n cefnogi'r rheolaeth honno ar goed trefol. Mae pob un ohonom ni'n gwybod, on'd ydym, bod coed yn gynefin gwerthfawr i fywyd gwyllt a phryfed peillio, eu bod yn helpu i leihau llygredd aer, llifogydd trefol a thymheredd wyneb - a fyddai'n ddefnyddiol heddiw - a phob un o'r rhain yn hynod o bwysig i iechyd a lles pobl sy'n byw mewn trefi a dinasoedd. Rwy'n sicr y bydd pobl yn yr ystafell hon sydd â'r un meddylfryd â mi yn rhannu fy mhryderon ynghylch Cyngor Dinas Sheffield yn cwympo nifer enfawr o goed iach yn eu hardal. Nawr, rydym ni'n gwybod bod 17 y cant o orchudd coed trefol a bod angen inni wneud rhywbeth am hynny. Gofynnaf i chi, Weinidog, a fyddwch chi'n cael sgwrs ag Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet sy'n gyfrifol am gynllunio i sicrhau, wrth inni geisio cyrraedd ein targed o 20,000 o gartrefi newydd erbyn 2021, nad ydym yn syml yn mynd i safle tir glas, yn ei glirio'n llwyr, yn adeiladu tai ac yn ceisio rhoi rhywfaint o borfa yn ôl neu ambell lwyn yma ac acw i'n bodloni ein hunain. Oherwydd nid yw hynny'n ein bodloni ein hunain. Rwy'n credu bod angen meddwl radical arnom yma wrth sôn am adeiladu cartrefi, ac, ar yr un pryd, ceisio cynnal y cynefinoedd sydd yno eisoes, yn hytrach na - ac rydym ni wedi clywed sôn amdano heddiw - meddwl am ddinistr ar raddfa fawr, yn fy marn i, yr amgylchedd trefol i'w gwneud yn haws ac yn rhatach i bobl adeiladu tai a sicrhau'r elw mwyaf.
English: The final item on the agenda this afternoon is a statement by the Minister for Housing and Regeneration on integrating housing, health and social care, and I call on the Minister to make her statement - Rebecca Evans.
Welsh: Yr eitem olaf ar ein hagenda ni am y prynhawn yma yw'r datganiad gan y Gweinidog Tai ac Adfywio ar integreiddio tai, iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol, a galwaf ar y Gweinidog i wneud ei datganiad - Rebecca Evans.
English: We're over time already with this statement. I have three other Members wishing to speak. Oh, I have an excellent Member at the back there, indicating that she no longer wishes to speak. I've got two other Members wishing to speak. I'll call you, but I want succinct questions and succinct answers. Jane Hutt.
Welsh: Rydym ni dros ein hamser eisoes gyda'r datganiad hwn. Mae gen i dri Aelod arall sy'n dymuno siarad. O, mae gen i Aelod ardderchog yn y cefn, sy'n dangos nad yw hi'n dymuno siarad mwyach. Mae gen i ddau Aelod arall sy'n dymuno siarad. Byddaf i yn eich galw, ond rwyf i eisiau cwestiynau cryno ac atebion cryno. Jane Hutt.
English: It's a very clever trick, Jane Hutt, to name-check the Llywydd in your contribution in order to squeeze in two rather than one question. Two quick answers.
Welsh: Mae'n gamp glyfar iawn, Jane Hutt, i enwi'r Llywydd yn eich cyfraniad er mwyn gwasgu dau gwestiwn i mewn yn hytrach nag un. Dau ateb cyflym.
English: Okay, I will be brief. I just want to recognise that, as other Members have said, there is genuinely cross-party interest and support for this agenda, so I think it's only fair to recognise that. In terms of the social housing partners and the housing sector on those regional partnership boards, it is true to say that their voice has been heard very well on some of those regional partnership boards as kind of associate members but not statutory members, but then, in other regional partnership boards, housing feels frustrated, I think, that they haven't had their voice heard. So, that's one of the reasons why we have taken the decision to put housing as statutory partners on those regional partnership boards, to make sure that they get the credit that they deserve on those boards, but also get the strong voice and are taken as seriously as they should be, given how important the capital element is to this and how important we see housing in terms of supporting people's good health and well-being. In terms of the funding, this is a three-year funding arrangement, so it will be £30 million for this year, £35 million for the following year, and £40 million for the year after that. This should be able to give regional partnership boards the opportunity to plan forward with that. We've written to the regional partnership boards today, outlining their indicative allocations for each particular region.
Welsh: Iawn, byddaf yn gryno. Rwy'n dymuno cydnabod, fel y mae Aelodau eraill wedi nodi, bod diddordeb a chefnogaeth drawsbleidiol wirioneddol ar gyfer yr agenda hon, felly rwy'n credu nad yw hi ond yn deg cydnabod hynny. O ran y partneriaid tai cymdeithasol a'r sector tai ar y byrddau partneriaeth rhanbarthol hynny, mae'n wir dweud bod eu llais wedi ei glywed yn dda iawn ar rai byrddau partneriaeth rhanbarthol hynny fel math o aelodau cysylltiedig ond nid aelodau statudol, ond wedyn ar fyrddau partneriaeth rhanbarthol eraill, mae sector tai yn teimlo'n rhwystredig, rwy'n credu, nad yw eu llais wedi'i glywed. Felly, dyna un o'r rhesymau pam yr ydym ni wedi penderfynu gwneud y sector tai yn bartneriaid statudol ar y byrddau partneriaeth rhanbarthol hynny, i wneud yn siŵr eu bod yn cael y gydnabyddiaeth y maent yn ei haeddu ar y byrddau hynny, ond eu bod hefyd yn cael llais cryf a'u bod yn cael eu cymryd o ddifri fel y dylen nhw, o ystyried pa mor bwysig yw'r elfen gyfalaf yn hyn, a pha mor bwysig yw tai, yn ein tyb ni, i gefnogi iechyd da a lles pobl. O ran y cyllid, trefniant cyllid tair blynedd yw hwn, felly bydd yn £30 miliwn eleni, £35 miliwn ar gyfer y flwyddyn ganlynol a £40 miliwn ar gyfer y flwyddyn ar ôl honno. Dylai hyn allu rhoi cyfle i fyrddau partneriaeth rhanbarthol flaengynllunio. Rydym ni wedi ysgrifennu at y byrddau partneriaeth rhanbarthol heddiw, yn amlinellu eu dyraniadau dangosol ar gyfer pob rhanbarth penodol.