English: I think that the Bill does provide an opportunity for us to work in that way, but until the arrangements of the commission itself are in place - . I understand that there is an expectation, because there is no one committee responsible for driving the Welsh language, that it will be the responsibility of each committee - three committees - to mainstream the Welsh language. And certainly, because there is a recognition that the commission is subject to the standards, there will be an expectation that all of the commission's engagement ensures that the Welsh language is a full consideration within the way that they work. But I think that there is still a question, in terms of the accountability that there will be on the commission's behalf, for us to see that that is implemented. It's the action and the implementation that's important, rather than that every element of our concerns or our interests is reflected in a Bill in full. But there will be a need, for example, for the Government to look in detail at the commission's annual report to ensure that there is full consideration given to the Welsh language and that it challenges the commission if that doesn't happen. Also, I think that the most important thing is the way these agreements are created in terms of the commission's own expectations of providers. Because, in my view, that's the weak point at the moment, if I am honest. That is to do with funding, and, as I said earlier, the way that the courses are defined, even, because there is no assurance in terms of the fact that the Welsh language is being considered as it should be considered, unless there is that accountability at every level.
Welsh: Dwi'n meddwl bod y Bil yn rhoi'r cyfle inni weithredu felly, ond i ddweud y gwir, tan bydd trefniadau'r comisiwn ei hun mewn lle - . Dwi'n deall bod yna ddisgwyl, o achos bod yna ddim un pwyllgor yma sy'n gyfrifol am yrru o ran y Gymraeg, mai cyfrifoldeb yr holl bwyllgorau - tri phwyllgor - fydd i brif-ffrydio'r Gymraeg. Ac yn bendant, o achos bod yna gydnabyddiaeth bod y comisiwn yn dod o dan y safonau, mi fydd yna ddisgwyl gennym ni fod yr holl ymwneud gan y comisiwn yn sicrhau bod y Gymraeg yn ystyriaeth lawn o fewn y ffordd maen nhw'n gweithio. Ond dwi'n meddwl bod dal i fod cwestiwn, o ran yr atebolrwydd fydd yna o ran y comisiwn, inni weld bod hynny yn cael ei weithredu. Y gweithredu sy'n bwysig, yn hytrach na bod pob elfen o'n pryderon ni neu'n diddordebau ni yn cael eu hadlewyrchu mewn Bil. Ond mi fydd angen, er enghraifft, i'r Llywodraeth edrych yn fanwl ar adroddiad blynyddol y comisiwn i sicrhau bod yna ystyriaeth lawn yn cael ei rhoi o ran y Gymraeg ac yn herio'r comisiwn os dydy hynny ddim yn digwydd. Hefyd, dwi'n meddwl y peth pwysicaf ydy'r ffordd mae'r cytundebau yma'n cael eu creu o ran disgwyliadau gan y comisiwn ei hun o ran y darparwyr. Achos yn fy marn i, dyna'r man gwan ar hyn o bryd, os dwi'n onest. Mae hynny'n ymwneud â chyllido, a, fel roeddwn i'n ei ddweud yn gynharach, y ffordd mae hyd yn oed y cyrsiau'n cael eu diffinio, achos does yna ddim sicrwydd o ran bod y Gymraeg yn cael ei hystyried fel y dylai gael ei gwneud, heblaw bod yr atebolrwydd yna ar bob lefel.