techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, if the Prime Minister is unable to secure agreement on the final terms of the UK's exit from the EU, to my mind, there should be a general election. If there's no general election or if a general election throws up an inconclusive result, how else can the issue be resolved other than through a second referendum?
Welsh: Wel, os nad yw Prif Weinidog y DU yn gallu sicrhau cytundeb ar delerau terfynol ymadawiad y DU â'r UE, dylai fod etholiad cyffredinol, yn fy marn i. Os nad oes etholiad cyffredinol neu os bydd etholiad cyffredinol yn cyflwyno canlyniad amhendant, sut arall y gellir datrys y mater heblaw drwy ail refferendwm?
English: It could be resolved by doing what you said in 2016, First Minister, when you said that you respected the result of the referendum - that you accepted the decision made by the people and would not work against the referendum result. Even in March this year, you said, 'I am not questioning Brexit - the UK is leaving the EU.' Notwithstanding what you said before, isn't it clear, First Minister, from your answer today and your amendment tomorrow that you want to betray the democratic decision of the people of Wales?
Welsh: Gellid ei ddatrys trwy wneud yr hyn a ddywedasoch yn 2016, Prif Weinidog, pan ddywedasoch eich bod chi'n parchu canlyniad y refferendwm - eich bod chi'n derbyn y penderfyniad a wnaed gan y bobl ac na fyddech chi'n gweithio yn erbyn canlyniad y refferendwm. Hyd yn oed ym mis Mawrth eleni, dywedasoch, 'Nid wyf yn cwestiynu Brexit - mae'r Deyrnas Unedig yn ymadael â'r Undeb Ewropeaidd.' Er gwaethaf yr hyn a ddywedasoch o'r blaen, onid yw'n eglur, Prif Weinidog, o'ch ateb heddiw a'ch gwelliant yfory eich bod chi eisiau bradychu penderfyniad democrataidd pobl Cymru?
English: Could I remind the Member that he sits on the benches of a party that, for eight years, demanded a second referendum on devolution. The 1997 referendum was not accepted by the Conservative Party, and in 2005 they ran on a manifesto promise of a second referendum, so the double standards here are absolutely breathtaking. Let me move on to the point that he makes. How do you resolve the issue? If Britain leaves with no deal, are we really saying that the people have no right to express an opinion on that? Because nobody two years ago - not even him - said, 'A "no deal" Brexit is likely'. No-one said it. Everybody said - Nigel Farage said it, the Brexiteers said it - 'Oh, it'll be the easiest negotiation in the world, we'll have a free trade agreement like that, the German car manufacturers will drive it, et cetera, et cetera.' You've heard me say it in this Chamber. But, surely, if there's no deal, people have a right to express a view as to what they think about that. They may say, 'Well, let's leave with no deal.' They may say that. They may say, 'Well, let's -
Welsh: A gaf i atgoffa'r Aelod ei fod yn eistedd ar feinciau plaid a wnaeth, am wyth mlynedd, alw am ail refferendwm ar ddatganoli. Ni dderbyniwyd refferendwm 1997 gan y Blaid Geidwadol, ac fe wnaethant ymgeisio yn 2005 ar sail addewid maniffesto o ail refferendwm, felly mae'r safonau dwbl yma yn gwbl syfrdanol. Gadewch i mi symud ymlaen at y pwynt y mae'n ei wneud. Sut ydych chi'n datrys y mater? Os bydd Prydain yn gadael heb gytundeb, a ydym ni wir yn dweud nad oes gan bobl unrhyw hawl i fynegi barn ar hynny? Oherwydd ni ddywedodd neb ddwy flynedd yn ôl - nid ef hyd yn oed, 'Mae Brexit "dim cytundeb" yn debygol'. Ni ddywedodd neb hynny. Dywedodd pawb - dywedodd Nigel Farage hyn, dywedodd cefnogwyr Brexit hyn - 'O, y rhain fydd y trafodaethau hawddaf yn y byd, bydd gennym ni gytundeb masnach rydd ymhen dim, bydd gweithgynhyrchwyr ceir yr Almaen yn ei ysgogi, ac yn y blaen, ac yn y blaen.' Rydych chi wedi fy nghlywed i'n dweud yn y Siambr hon. Ond, does bosib, os nad oes cytundeb, nad oes gan bobl hawl i fynegi barn am yr hyn y maen nhw'n ei feddwl am hynny. Efallai y byddan nhw'n dweud, 'Wel, gadewch i ni adael heb gytundeb.' Efallai y byddan nhw'n dweud hynny. Efallai y byddan nhw'n dweud, 'Wel, gadewch i ni -
English: They voted to leave.
Welsh: Fe wnaethant bleidleisio i adael.
English: Well, I'm not taking any advice from UKIP. Their current policy is a second referendum on devolution anyway without actually realising the irony in their comments. If people find themselves in a situation where a 'no deal' Brexit is all that is on the table, when nobody mentioned a 'no deal' Brexit two years ago, is it actually honest to say to people, 'Tough luck. Two years ago, you had your say on this. All right, this option wasn't discussed or wasn't on the table, but it's too bad because you've already expressed a view'? I don't think that's democracy. People surely should have the opportunity, whether - my preference - through a general election that would then throw up a decisive result, then that would mean that there would be no need for a referendum at that point, or, secondly, if the election was inconclusive, what's so bad about asking the people about this who took the decision in the first place?
Welsh: Wel, nid wyf i'n cymryd unrhyw gyngor gan UKIP. Eu polisi presennol nhw yw ail refferendwm ar ddatganoli beth bynnag heb sylweddoli'r eironi yn eu sylwadau. Os bydd pobl yn canfod eu hunain mewn sefyllfa lle mai Brexit 'dim cytundeb' yw'r cwbl sydd ar y bwrdd, er na soniodd neb am Brexit 'dim cytundeb' ddwy flynedd yn ôl, a yw hi wir yn onest i ddweud wrth bobl, 'Anlwcus. Cawsoch leisio eich barn ar hyn ddwy flynedd yn ôl. Iawn, ni thrafodwyd y dewis hwn neu nid oedd ar y bwrdd, ond mae hynny'n anffodus oherwydd rydych chi eisoes wedi mynegi barn'? Nid wyf i'n meddwl mai democratiaeth yw hynny. Does bosib na ddylai pobl gael y cyfle, pa un a - fy newis i - trwy etholiad cyffredinol a fyddai'n cynnig canlyniad pendant wedyn, yna byddai hynny'n golygu na fyddai angen refferendwm ar yr adeg honno, neu, yn ail, pe byddai'r etholiad yn amhendant, beth sydd mor wael am ofyn i'r bobl am hyn, a wnaeth y penderfyniad yn y lle cyntaf?
English: Because you ignore what they tell you.
Welsh: Gan eich bod chi'n anwybyddu'r hyn y maen nhw'n ei ddweud wrthych chi.
English: I'm still at a loss to understand exactly why the First Minister thinks that a conclusive general election - presumably with the Labour victory that he would want - would help his Government further 'Securing Wales' Future', which I am still assuming is the policy of the Welsh Government. Because if there is a majority Labour Government in any snap general election, we'll be leaving the single market and leaving the customs union, and the people would have absolutely no right to have a say on that question properly. So, even looking again at the question of time frames, presuming there is a general election in January, without extending article 50 that's two months - three months max - the Labour Government would have to negotiate our departure from the single market and customs union, which is, of course, precisely the policy of the current United Kingdom Government. So, rather than going through all of that nonsense, why can't the First Minister just say, 'Let the people decide, and let them decide now'?
Welsh: Rwy'n dal i fod ar goll yn llwyr o ran deall pam yn union y mae'r Prif Weinidog yn credu y byddai etholiad cyffredinol â chanlyniad pendant - gyda'r fuddugoliaeth i Lafur y byddai'n dymuno ei gweld, rwy'n tybio - yn helpu ei Lywodraeth i 'Ddiogelu Dyfodol Cymru' ymhellach, sy'n dal i fod yn un o bolisïau Llywodraeth Cymru rwy'n tybio. Oherwydd os ceir Llywodraeth Lafur fwyafrifol mewn unrhyw etholiad cyffredinol dirybudd, byddwn yn gadael y farchnad sengl ac yn gadael yr undeb tollau, ac ni fyddai gan bobl unrhyw hawl o gwbl i gael lleisio eu barn ar y cwestiwn hwnnw yn briodol. Felly, hyd yn oed o edrych eto ar y cwestiwn o amserlenni, gan dybio y bydd etholiad cyffredinol ym mis Ionawr, heb ymestyn erthygl 50 mae hynny'n ddau fis - tri mis ar y mwyaf - a fyddai gan Lywodraeth Lafur i drafod ein hymadawiad â'r farchnad sengl a'r undeb tollau, sef, wrth gwrs, union bolisi Llywodraeth bresennol y Deyrnas Unedig. Felly, yn hytrach na mynd drwy'r holl lol hwnnw, pam na all y Prif Weinidog ddweud, 'Gadewch i'r bobl benderfynu, a gadewch iddyn nhw benderfynu nawr'?
English: Well, the difficulty is this, isn't it: there's no deal on the table as yet. So, you'd be asking people to take a decision without knowing what the full consequences will be. I think they need to be fully informed - they weren't two years ago - of what the consequences would be. It would take just as long to organise a referendum. To my mind, a general election would give an opportunity for the parties to set out their stalls in detail as to what they think Brexit should look like, and on that basis people can vote accordingly. If there is an inconclusive result, then, he's right: how else do you resolve the issue other than through asking the very same people who took the decision two years ago whether, in the full knowledge of what they know now, they want to go ahead? The problem has always been this: two years ago, people were asked to vote for an idea - there was no plan: an idea - and people would interpret it in different ways. There are some in this Chamber who will interpret the vote in 2016 as a vote for any kind of Brexit, no deal or not. Others, like me, will interpret it as a vote for Brexit, but not on whatever terms get thrown at the UK. When we had our referendums for devolution, people could, if they wished, look at the document that would tell them exactly what would happen if they voted 'yes'. That didn't happen in 2016. So, surely, if we're in that situation where there's no deal, or a bad deal, people have the right to be able to express a view as to what they want to do. Just trust the people.
Welsh: Wel, yr anhawster yw hyn, onid e: nid oes cytundeb ar y bwrdd eto. Felly, byddech chi'n gofyn i bobl wneud penderfyniad heb wybod beth fydd y canlyniadau llawn. Rwy'n credu bod angen eu hysbysu'n llawn - ni ddigwyddodd hynny ddwy flynedd yn ôl - o beth fyddai'r canlyniadau. Byddai'n cymryd yr un cyfnod o amser i drefnu refferendwm. Yn fy marn i, byddai etholiad cyffredinol yn rhoi cyfle i'r pleidiau gyflwyno eu safbwyntiau yn fanwl ynghylch sut y maen nhw'n credu y dylai Brexit edrych, ac ar y sail honno, gall pobl bleidleisio yn unol â hynny. Os bydd canlyniad amhendant, yna, mae'n iawn: sut arall ydych chi'n datrys y mater heblaw drwy ofyn i union yr un bobl a wnaeth y penderfyniad ddwy flynedd yn ôl, a ydynt, gyda gwybodaeth lawn yr hyn y maen nhw'n ei wybod nawr, yn dymuno bwrw ymlaen? Y broblem erioed fu hyn: ddwy flynedd yn ôl, gofynnwyd i bobl bleidleisio dros syniad - nid oedd cynllun: syniad - a byddai pobl yn ei ddehongli mewn gwahanol ffyrdd. Ceir rhai yn y Siambr hon a fydd yn dehongli'r bleidlais yn 2016 fel pleidlais dros unrhyw fath o Brexit, cytundeb ai peidio. Bydd eraill, fel fi, yn ei dehongli fel pleidlais dros Brexit, ond nid ar ba bynnag delerau sy'n cael eu taflu at y DU. Pan gawsom ni ein refferenda ar ddatganoli, gallai pobl, os oedden nhw'n dymuno, edrych ar y ddogfen a fyddai'n dweud wrthyn nhw yn union beth fyddai'n digwydd pe byddent yn pleidleisio o blaid. Ni ddigwyddodd hynny yn 2016. Felly, does bosib, os ydym ni yn y sefyllfa honno lle nad oes cytundeb, neu fod cytundeb gwael, bod gan bobl hawl i allu mynegi barn ynglŷn â'r hyn y maen nhw'n dymuno ei wneud. Ymddiriedwch yn y bobl.
English: The health board continues to report the best performance in Wales against unscheduled care targets, which should support resilience as we enter the difficult winter period. We have received its integrated winter delivery plan and provided tailored feedback to inform further enhancement of its plan.
Welsh: Mae'r bwrdd iechyd yn parhau i adrodd y perfformiad gorau yng Nghymru yn erbyn targedau gofal heb ei drefnu, a ddylai gefnogi cydnerthedd wrth i ni gychwyn ar gyfnod anodd y gaeaf. Rydym ni wedi derbyn ei gynllun cyflawni integredig ar gyfer y gaeaf ac wedi rhoi adborth wedi'i deilwra i lywio gwaith pellach i wella ei gynllun.
English: Thank you, First Minister. I appreciate that the day-to-day delivery of health service provision in Cardiff and Vale is the health board's responsibility, but there's a level of interaction between the Welsh Government and the health board. One of the key pinch points last year was the provision of beds within the hospitals within that area. What certainty can you give the people of Cardiff and Vale that there will be additional beds made available to deal with the excess pressures that undoubtedly will occur through the winter months?
Welsh: Diolch, Prif Weinidog. Rwy'n sylweddoli mai cyfrifoldeb y bwrdd iechyd yw gwneud y ddarpariaeth o wasanaethau iechyd o ddydd i ddydd yng Nghaerdydd a'r Fro, ond ceir lefel o ryngweithio rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru a'r bwrdd iechyd. Un o'r prif bwyntiau o anhawster y llynedd oedd y ddarpariaeth o welyau yn yr ysbytai yn yr ardal honno. Pa sicrwydd allwch chi ei roi i bobl Caerdydd a'r Fro y bydd gwelyau ychwanegol ar gael i ymdrin â'r pwysau gormodol a fydd heb os yn digwydd yn ystod misoedd y gaeaf?
English: I am fully aware, as I stand here every week, that there is a level of accountability to Ministers in terms of questions that need to be answered. Preparations for the winter have been taking place throughout Wales and across organisational boundaries since last winter. There was a review of what happened last year: five key priorities have been collected and identified for delivery to support greater resilience next winter. We have now received integrated health and social care winter delivery plans from all the health boards, from the Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust and from local authority partners. They align to the priorities, and officials were encouraged by the level of assurance provided by the local health and care system in Cardiff and the Vale, with a high number of actions already well-embedded or being implemented to strengthen winter delivery to local people.
Welsh: Rwy'n gwbl ymwybodol, wrth i mi sefyll yn y fan yma bob wythnos, bod lefel o atebolrwydd i Weinidogion o ran cwestiynau y mae angen eu hateb. Mae paratoadau ar gyfer y gaeaf wedi bod yn cael eu gwneud ledled Cymru ac ar draws ffiniau sefydliadol ers y gaeaf diwethaf. Cynhaliwyd adolygiad o'r hyn a ddigwyddodd y llynedd: casglwyd a nodwyd pum blaenoriaeth allweddol ar gyfer darpariaeth i gynorthwyo mwy o gadernid y gaeaf nesaf. Rydym ni wedi derbyn cynlluniau cyflawni iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol integredig ar gyfer y gaeaf erbyn hyn gan yr holl fyrddau iechyd, Ymddiriedolaeth GIG Gwasanaethau Ambiwlans Cymru a chan bartneriaid awdurdod lleol. Maen nhw'n cyd-fynd â'r blaenoriaethau, a chalonogwyd swyddogion gan lefel y sicrwydd a ddarparwyd gan y system iechyd a gofal lleol yng Nghaerdydd a'r Fro, gyda nifer fawr o gamau gweithredu eisoes wedi eu hymwreiddio'n dda neu'n cael eu rhoi ar waith i gryfhau darpariaeth y gaeaf i bobl leol.
English: The Welsh Government is a statutory body for nationally significant infrastructure projects in Wales. As part of the processes, we have responded to the pre-application consultation and we are currently considering the evidence presented for the development consent order application.
Welsh: Mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn gorff statudol ar gyfer projectau seilwaith o arwyddocâd cenedlaethol yng Nghymru. Fel rhan o'r prosesau, rydym ni wedi ymateb i'r ymgynghoriad cyn ymgeisio ac rydym yn ystyried y dystiolaeth a gyflwynwyd fel rhan o'r cais gorchymyn caniatâd datblygu ar hyn o bryd.
English: That application has been submitted, but the grid, since the beginning of this process, haven't given an inch in response to the pressure from me, the Member of Parliament, the council or, more importantly, the unanimity of the people of Anglesey that we need to underground these cables, and let's recall that this Chamber favoured undergrounding rather than pylons and voted for that. You said in January that you'd remind the grid of that. So, what was their response? But, more importantly, will you give a commitment to push as much as possible as Welsh Government to ensure that the British Planning Inspectorate realises that the democratic views of this Parliament have been expressed, and that they must respect that? And, with a further suggestion that a tunnel that could put cables under the Menai could cost £300 million, isn't it clear that it would be a scandal if the money, or part of that money, weren't spent on a new bridge to carry cables and vehicles, with the rest being invested in undergrounding?
Welsh: Mae'r cais wedi cael ei gyflwyno bellach, ond nid ydy'r grid, wrth gwrs, ers dechrau'r broses yma, ddim wedi ildio dim i'r pwysau gen i, yr Aelod Seneddol, y cyngor nac, yn bwysicach fyth, unfrydiaeth trigolion Ynys Môn y dylid tanddaearu, a chofiwch fod y Senedd yma wedi pleidleisio dros yr egwyddor o ffafrïo tanddaearu yn hytrach na gosod peilonau newydd. Mi ddywedasoch chi ym mis Ionawr y buasech chi'n atgoffa'r grid o hynny, felly, beth oedd eu hymateb nhw? Ond, yn bwysicach na hynny, a wnewch chi roi ymrwymiad i wthio i'r eithaf o Lywodraeth Cymru ar yr Arolygiaeth Gynllunio Prydeinig i sylweddoli bod barn ddemocrataidd y Senedd hon wedi cael ei datgan a bod yn rhaid iddyn nhw barchu hynny? Ymhellach, efo'r awgrym bellach y gallai twnnel i roi ceblau o dan y Fenai gostio cymaint â £300 miliwn, onid ydy hi'n amlwg y byddai hi'n sgandal pe na bai'r arian, neu ran ohono, yn cael ei wario ar bont newydd i gario gwifrau a cherbydau, efo gweddill yr arian yn cael ei fuddsoddi mewn tanddaearu?
English: That is right. We, of course, as a Government have told the grid that it's extremely important to consider a third crossing - a third bridge over the Menai strait - in order to ensure that the cables can go on that bridge. There is a formal agreement between ourselves and the grid to consider these cables, and I would imagine that it would be a totally sensible thing to do if there is any practical problem in relation to that. Because we are a statutory party to this, we will be taking part in the development consent order inspection itself, and we will be looking to develop a statement of common ground with the grid about the project itself. But, of course, the grid knows the views of this Assembly and the views of local people. We, as a Government, want to ensure that any impact on the area is kept to a minimum.
Welsh: Mae hynny'n iawn. Rŷm ni, fel Llywodraeth, wrth gwrs, wedi gwneud y pwynt hwn i'r grid ei bod yn bwysig dros ben i ystyried pont newydd - trydedd bont ar draws y Menai - er mwyn sicrhau bod y ceblau'n gallu mynd ar y bont honno. Mae yna gytundeb ffurfiol wedi cael ei wneud rhyngom ni a'r grid i ystyried y ceblau hyn ac rwy'n credu y byddai'n rhywbeth a fyddai'n hollol synhwyrol os oes yna unrhyw broblem ymarferol ynglŷn â hynny. O achos y ffaith ein bod ni'n barti statudol, wrth gwrs y byddwn ni'n cymryd rhan yn arolygiad y gorchymyn caniatâd datblygu ei hun, a byddwn ni yn datblygu datganiad o dir cyffredin gyda'r grid ynglŷn â'r project ei hun. Ond, wrth gwrs, bydd y grid yn gwybod beth yw barn y Cynulliad hwn a barn pobl leol. Rydym ni fel Llywodraeth yn moyn sicrhau bod unrhyw impact ar yr ardal yn cael ei gadw'n impact bach a'r lleiaf sy'n bosib.
English: The next item, therefore, is the business statement and announcement, and I call on the leader of the house to make the statement - Julie James.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf, felly, yw'r datganiad a chyhoeddiad busnes. Rydw i'n galw ar arweinydd y tŷ i wneud ei datganiad - Julie James.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. There are two changes to this week's business: today's statement on the findings of the independent and accelerated programme for amber review has been postponed and, instead, a statement on 'An Update on Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis - our Approach in Wales' has been added. Draft business for the next few weeks is set out in the business statement and announcement, which can be found amongst the meeting papers available to Members electronically.
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Mae dau newid i fusnes yr wythnos hon: gohiriwyd datganiad heddiw am ganfyddiadau'r rhaglen garlam annibynnol i adolygu galwadau melyn, ac yn hytrach ychwanegwyd datganiad ar 'Yr wybodaeth ddiweddaraf am broffylacsis cyn-gysylltiad - ein dull o weithio yng Nghymru'. Mae'r busnes drafft ar gyfer yr ychydig wythnosau nesaf wedi'i nodi yn y datganiad a chyhoeddiad busnes, y gellir ei weld ymhlith papurau'r cyfarfod sydd ar gael i'r Aelodau yn electronig.
English: Leader of the house, may I ask for a statement from the Cabinet Secretary for Education on the current pay offer made by ColegauCymru to lecturers, please? Welsh Government publications have recognised that further education provides opportunities for individuals to build and fulfil their ambitions. The better people's skills, the better their chances of getting fair, secure and rewarding employment and the stronger the skills base is in Wales, the more chances we have of attracting new businesses and growing existing ones to improve prosperity. A constituent of mine claims that concerns about pay levels have led to many leaving their jobs for more lucrative employment, and shortages in applicants for positions requiring specific skills such as engineering and construction. Sorry - I think that is it. I haven't got the second side. So, basically, I need a statement from the Cabinet Secretary for Education on the current pay offer to lecturers, please.
Welsh: Arweinydd y tŷ, a gaf i ofyn am ddatganiad gan Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Addysg ar y cynnig cyflog presennol i ddarlithwyr a wnaed gan ColegauCymru, os gwelwch yn dda? Mae cyhoeddiadau Llywodraeth Cymru yn cydnabod bod addysg bellach yn cynnig cyfleoedd i unigolion feithrin a chyflawni eu huchelgeisiau. Gorau'n byd yw sgiliau pobl, gwell yw eu gobaith am gyflogaeth deg, sicr a boddhaol. A'r cryfaf yw'r sylfaen sgiliau yng Nghymru, y mwyaf o gyfleoedd sydd gennym o ddenu busnesau newydd yn ogystal â meithrin y rhai sy'n bodoli eisoes i wella ffyniant. Mae un o'm hetholwyr yn honni bod pryderon am lefelau cyflog wedi peri i lawer adael eu swyddi am gyflogaeth fwy proffidiol, a bod prinder ymgeiswyr am swyddi sy'n gofyn am sgiliau penodol, megis peirianneg ac adeiladu. Mae'n flin gennyf - dyna ni, rwy'n credu. Nid yw'r ail ochr gennyf. Felly, yn y bôn, rwyf eisiau gweld datganiad gan yr Ysgrifennydd Cabinet dros Addysg ar y cynnig cyflog presennol i ddarlithwyr, os gwelwch yn dda.
English: Yes. I think there is a real issue here about the amount of money available to the Welsh Government to pay the terms and conditions that we'd like to, however, this Government has, of course, guaranteed parity for the FE lecturers with teachers and I know that the Cabinet Secretary has made that point very clearly in this Chamber on a number of occasions. I don't think she needs to do so again in a statement.
Welsh: Ie. Rwy'n credu bod problem wirioneddol yma ynghylch y swm o arian sydd ar gael i Lywodraeth Cymru i dalu'r telerau ac amodau yr hoffem eu talu. Fodd bynnag, mae'r Llywodraeth hon, wrth gwrs, wedi sicrhau cydraddoldeb ar gyfer darlithwyr addysg bellach ac athrawon, a gwn fod Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet wedi amlygu'r pwynt hwnnw yn glir ar sawl achlysur yn y Siambr hon. Nid wyf yn credu y dylai orfod gwneud hynny eto mewn datganiad.