English: First of all, I also want to reiterate how shameful it is that Wales has not been consulted meaningfully on the withdrawal agreement. It's not good enough, as the Cabinet Secretary for Finance said yesterday, just to listen to what we say and then go away and we hear no more. The last of the Labour Party's six tests is: does it deliver for all regions and nations of the UK? And it certainly does not. Does the First Minister believe, in fact, that the withdrawal agreement meets any of those six tests that the Labour Party has put forward? The withdrawal agreement lays out how EU citizens and families and UK citizens will be protected after we leave the EU. Those are people who have chosen where they would live under the freedom of movement, which, up to now, has been our right, within the EU. Now that we're losing the right of freedom of movement, does he not agree that the uncertainty about who is going to be able to stay in this country and who will come here in the future is causing great uncertainty for businesses? I had a meeting yesterday with a company director from Cardiff North of a medical products manufacturing company who relies heavily on European staff. He was telling me, in fact, how much he felt for those staff at the moment, because they were so uncertain - they felt so uncertain about their future. And, of course, we have had some information laid down in this withdrawal document today, but we don't know what the future will hold. He is very uncertain about how his company, which is a very valued company in Cardiff North, will prosper in the future, with the future proposals for immigration and no freedom of movement, and, of course, we do know what the CBI's view is about the Government's plans for immigration. So, doesn't he agree as well that some of the rhetoric that has been used around the immigration issue does not foster good relations - Theresa May's words were that her deal will stop EU nationals 'jumping the queue' - and how unnecessary it is to use that sort of expression? It's building up division again, and I think we had such a spike in hate crime when we had the referendum, and there are more hate crimes now being reported than have ever happened before, and I think it behoves us, all of us politicians, that we must be very careful with the words that we use in order that we, in this very, very difficult time, don't increase the feelings of insecurity that many of our citizens have as a result of this very divisive vote and the very divisive politics that we're experiencing at the moment. So, has the First Minister got any comments he could make about that particular issue?
Welsh: Yn gyntaf oll, fe hoffwn i hefyd ailadrodd pa mor gywilyddus yw hi nad ymgynghorwyd yn ystyrlon â Chymru ynglŷn â'r cytundeb ymadael. Nid yw'n ddigon da, fel y dywedodd yr Ysgrifennydd Cabinet dros Gyllid ddoe, dim ond gwrando ar yr hyn a ddywedwn ni ac yna mynd ymaith a dydym ni'n clywed dim mwy. Yr olaf o chwe phrawf y Blaid Lafur yw: a yw'n darparu ar gyfer holl ranbarthau a gwledydd y Deyrnas Unedig? Ac nid yw'n gwneud hynny, yn sicr. A yw Prif Weinidog Cymru yn credu, mewn gwirionedd, bod y cytundeb ymadael yn bodloni unrhyw un o'r chwe phrawf hynny a gyflwynwyd gan y Blaid Lafur? Mae'r cytundeb ymadael yn gosod allan sut y caiff dinasyddion a theuluoedd yr UE a dinasyddion y DU eu diogelu ar ôl inni adael yr UE. Dyna'r bobl sydd wedi dewis ble maen nhw eisiau byw yn unol â'u rhyddid i symud, a oedd, hyd yma, yn hawl i ni, o fewn yr UE. Nawr ein bod ni'n colli'r hawl hwnnw o ryddid i symud, onid yw'n cytuno bod yr ansicrwydd ynghylch pwy sy'n mynd i allu aros yn y wlad hon a phwy fydd yn dod yma yn y dyfodol yn achosi ansicrwydd mawr i fusnesau? Cefais gyfarfod ddoe â chyfarwyddwr cwmni o Ogledd Gaerdydd sy'n gwneud cynhyrchion meddygol ac sy'n dibynnu'n drwm ar staff Ewropeaidd. Roedd yn dweud wrthyf i, mewn gwirionedd, cymaint yr oedd yn tosturio wrth y staff hynny ar hyn o bryd, oherwydd eu bod mor ansicr - maen nhw'n teimlo mor ansicr ynghylch eu dyfodol. Ac, wrth gwrs, rydym ni wedi cael rhywfaint o wybodaeth yn y ddogfen ymadael hon heddiw, ond nid ydym ni'n gwybod beth fydd ar y gorwel. Mae'n ansicr iawn ynghylch sut y bydd ei gwmni, sy'n gwmni gwerthfawr iawn yng Ngogledd Caerdydd, yn ffynnu yn y dyfodol, gyda'r cynigion ar gyfer mewnfudo yn y dyfodol a dim rhyddid i symud, ac, wrth gwrs, rydym ni'n gwybod beth yw barn Cydffederasiwn Diwydiant Prydain am gynlluniau'r Llywodraeth o ran mewnfudo. Felly, onid yw'n cytuno hefyd nad yw peth o'r rhethreg a defnyddiwyd o ran y mater mewnfudo wedi meithrin cysylltiadau da - geiriau Theresa May oedd y bydd ei chytundeb yn rhwystro gwladolion yr UE rhag 'neidio i flaen y rhes' - a pha mor ddiangen yw hi i ddefnyddio'r math yna o ymadrodd? Mae'n hau rhaniadau eto, ac rwy'n credu y cawsom ni cymaint o gynnydd sydyn mewn troseddau casineb pan gawsom ni'r refferendwm, ac adroddir am fwy o droseddau casineb bellach nag erioed o'r blaen, ac mae dyletswydd arnom ni, bob un ohonom ni wleidyddion, bod yn rhaid inni fod yn ofalus iawn gyda'r geiriau a ddefnyddiwn ni fel nad ydym ni, ar yr adeg anodd iawn, iawn yma, yn cynyddu'r teimladau o ansicrwydd sydd gan lawer o'n dinasyddion o ganlyniad i'r bleidlais gynhennus iawn hon a'r wleidyddiaeth gynhennus iawn hon yr ydym ni'n dyst iddi ar hyn o bryd. Felly, a oes gan y Prif Weinidog unrhyw sylwadau a hoffai eu gwneud am y mater penodol hwnnw?