English: I will deal with the amendments in summing up, if I may, but I will start by moving the motion and reflecting on how we could help our small businesses to access the benefits of bilingualism, by looking at points 2 and 5. We are now three years into the Government's strategy and the Government says that it's on track to meet its early years education target by 2021. But it is very quiet on all the other targets. Regarding the issue of working with adults in work today, the work undertaken by the National Centre for Learning Welsh has primarily focused on the public sector. The previous commissioner had some success in changing the culture and provision of larger private businesses, and that's a point that deserves recognition, but her reach did not extend to smaller companies. Mentrau iaith are very different in terms of their skills, finance, experience and ambition, but it's not easy to quantify their success in creating more opportunities for people to use and develop their Welsh language skills in the workplace as well as in the community. I'm not convinced that everything, or anything perhaps, that the Welsh Government has funded or supported has made any significant or long-lasting progress in terms of persuading our smaller businesses of the advantages of bilingualism. There is research to support the claim that a bilingual offer and a bilingual workplace are beneficial, but how is that being shared with our chambers of commerce, the Federation of Small Businesses, the CBI and other membership organisations, for example - organisations that are not full of Government appointees or first-language Welsh speakers? Small business managers have goodwill towards the Welsh language, but they need incentives to act regarding its usage. That could be demand among staff or customers, it could be direct funding, it could be legislative measures, but we need to be very careful there, as the motion suggests, or it could change the voice of advocacy. I have to say that the first-language-Welsh establishment voice is not necessarily a voice that will persuade smaller companies to listen to the arguments in favour of welcoming bilingualism - 'I'm sure it will be a good idea, but for other people' - unless they can see the benefits that are of value to them. Business, in my opinion, needs to talk directly to business. That's why we want to see language champions from within the business world: co-production, transition, learners who know how difficult it is to make progress with the language, and those who understand the bottom line too. Perhaps we will have a more bilingual population 20 years from now, but we have to think about the workforce and the customers of today too. Your 14 officers will have an uphill struggle, Minister, unless they are on the inside, and it is a shame that you have disregarded that by removing this part of the motion. Apparently, in deleting points 3 and 4, you're not prepared to be scrutinised on your progress either. It doesn't matter how many business officers you have or how many community organisations you support if the use of Welsh isn't expanding in the workplace, or if we don't persuade businesses of its potential as a USP. But, given your amendment, you obviously don't want us to ask you questions about that at all. Finally, I turn to the purpose of point 6. We often pass laws in this place that create rights and duties without any remedy for non-compliance. Unusually, we didn't do that with the creation of the Welsh Language Commissioner; we gave the office powers of investigation, enforcement when standards are not used and rights are breached. But there is no such solution if the rights of a non-Welsh speaker are breached. If Welsh language standards are applied disproportionately so that those actions exclude someone who does not speak Welsh from having an opportunity, that person can only resort to the courts. We've all heard complaints when some public sector job adverts, for example, don't require a certain level of Welsh when they should. And of course everyone can go to the commissioner in that situation. But the potential is there in the other direction as well, and so I ask Members to think about how we could treat both situations fairly in terms of a remedy when both languages should be treated on the basis of equality. Our proposal doesn't undermine the rights of Welsh speakers, and if you want to say that this is not an issue for the commissioner, fine, but please say what your idea is as regards creating equal remedies in terms of unconscious discrimination. The reasons I raise this argument is this: the workplace can be the perfect place to develop and use Welsh language skills. Look at Members in this Chamber who have never used Welsh before, particularly in the workplace. And look at the Assembly staff. I would like to see employers think a little bit more about opportunities for dedicated and committed learners as well as fluent speakers when they consider job advertisements, for example, because if we lose the faith of our learners, we will lose the Welsh language.
Welsh: Gwnaf i ddelio â'r gwelliannau wrth grynhoi, os gallaf i, ond gaf i ddechrau gan symud y cynnig a dechrau ystyried sut y gallem helpu ein busnesau bach i dderbyn manteision dwyieithrwydd, gan edrych ar bwyntiau 2 a 5? Rydym dair blynedd i mewn i strategaeth y Llywodraeth erbyn hyn, a dywed y Llywodraeth ei bod ar y trywydd iawn i gyrraedd ei tharged addysg blynyddoedd cynnar erbyn 2021, ond mae hi'n dawel iawn am bob targed arall. Gan ystyried y mater o weithio gydag oedolion mewn gwaith heddiw, mae'r gwaith a wnaed gan y Ganolfan Genedlaethol Dysgu Cymraeg wedi bod yn bennaf gyda'r sector cyhoeddus. Mae'r comisiynydd blaenorol wedi cael rhywfaint o lwyddiant wrth newid diwylliant a darpariaeth busnesau preifat mwy, ac mae hynny'n haeddu cydnabyddiaeth, ond wnaeth ei braich ddim ymestyn i gwmnïau llai. Mae mentrau iaith yn wahanol iawn yn eu sgiliau, cyllid, profiad ac uchelgais, ond dyw hi ddim yn hawdd mesur eu llwyddiant wrth greu mwy o gyfleoedd i bobl ddefnyddio a datblygu eu sgiliau Cymraeg yn y gweithle yn ogystal ag yn y gymuned. Dwi ddim wedi fy argyhoeddi bod pob peth, unrhyw beth efallai, y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi'i ariannu neu ei gefnogi wedi gwneud unrhyw ddatblygiad sylweddol a hirbarhaol wrth berswadio ein busnesau llai o fanteision dwyieithrwydd. Mae yna ymchwil i ategu'r honiad bod cynnig dwyieithog, gweithle dwyieithog, yn fuddiol, ond sut mae hynny'n cael ei rannu gyda'n siambrau masnach, y Ffederasiwn Busnesau Bach, y CBI a'r sefydliadau aelodaeth eraill, er enghraifft - cyrff sydd ddim yn llawn o benodedigion y Llywodraeth neu siaradwyr Cymraeg iaith gyntaf? Mae gan reolwyr busnesau llai ewyllys da tuag at yr iaith Gymraeg, ond mae angen cymhelliad arnynt i weithredu ar ei defnyddio. Gallai hynny fod yn alw gan staff neu gwsmeriaid, gallai fod yn ariannol uniongyrchol, gallai fod yn ddeddfwriaethol, ac mae angen inni fod yn ofalus iawn yno, fel y mae'r cynnig yn ei awgrymu, neu gallai newid llais eiriolaeth. Mae'n rhaid i fi ddweud nad yw llais yr establishment Cymraeg iaith gyntaf o reidrwydd yn llais sy'n mynd i berswadio cwmnïau llai i wrando ar y dadleuon o blaid croesawu dwyieithrwydd - 'Rwy'n siŵr bydd y syniad yn dda, ond i bobl eraill' - oni bai eu bod nhw'n gallu gweld y budd sydd o werth iddyn nhw. Mae angen, yn fy marn i, i fusnes siarad yn uniongyrchol â busnes. Dyna pam rydym ni am weld hyrwyddwyr iaith y tu fewn i'r byd busnes: co-production, trosi; dysgwyr sy'n gwybod pa mor anodd yw hi i fwrw ymlaen gyda'r iaith ac sy'n deall y llinell waelod hefyd. Efallai y bydd gennym boblogaeth fwy dwyieithog ymhen 20 mlynedd, ond mae'n rhaid inni feddwl am y gweithle a gweithlu a chwsmeriaid heddiw hefyd. Mae gan eich 14 o swyddogion frwydr ar i fyny, Weinidog, os nad ydynt yn fewnweledwyr, ac mae'n drueni eich bod wedi diystyru hyn trwy ddileu'r rhan hon y cynnig. Mae'n debyg, wrth ddileu pwyntiau 3 a 4 hefyd, nad ydych chi'n barod i gael eich craffu ar eich cynnydd, chwaith. Does dim ots faint o swyddogion busnes sydd gennych neu faint o sefydliadau cymunedol yr ydych yn eu cefnogi os nad yw defnyddio'r Gymraeg yn tyfu fel profiad y gweithle, neu os nad ydym yn darbwyllo busnesau o'i botensial fel USP. Ond, ar ôl eich gwelliant, mae'n amlwg nad ydych chi am inni ofyn cwestiynau ichi am hynny o gwbl. I orffen, diben pwynt 6. Rydym yn aml yn pasio cyfraith yn y lle hwn sy'n creu hawliau a dyletswyddau heb unrhyw rhwymedi am ddiffyg cydymffurfio. Ond, yn anarferol, wnaethom ni ddim hynny gyda Chomisiynydd y Gymraeg. Rhoesom bwerau ymchwilio a gorfodi iddi pan na ddefnyddir safonau a thorrir hawliau. Ond does dim ateb o'r fath os torrir hawliau rhywun di-Gymraeg. Os bydd safonau'r Gymraeg yn cael eu cymhwyso'n anghymesur fel bod y gweithredoedd hynny yn eithrio rhywun nad yw'n siarad Cymraeg rhag cael cyfle, nid yw'r person hwnnw ond yn gallu troi at y llysoedd. Rydym i gyd wedi clywed cwynion lle mae rhai hysbysebion swyddi, er enghraifft, yn y sector cyhoeddus ddim yn gofyn am lefel benodol o Gymraeg pan ddylent, ac, wrth gwrs, mae pawb yn gallu mynd at y comisiynydd yn y sefyllfa yna, ond mae potensial yna yn y ffordd arall hefyd. Felly, gofynnaf i Aelodau jest i feddwl am sut y gallem drin y ddwy sefyllfa'n deg o ran rhwymedi pan ddylid trin y ddwy iaith ar y sail eu bod yn gyfartal. Dyw ein hawgrymiad ni ddim yn tanseilio hawliau siaradwyr Cymraeg. Os ŷch chi am ddweud nad mater i gomisiynydd yw hyn, ffein, ond dywedwch beth yw'ch syniad chi, a chreu rhwymedi cyfartal o safbwynt gwahaniaethu anymwybodol. Y rheswm rwyf wedi codi hyn yn y ddadl hon yw hyn: gall y gweithle fod yn lle perffaith i ddatblygu a defnyddio sgiliau Cymraeg. Edrychwch ar Aelodau fan hyn, er enghraifft, yn y Siambr sydd ddim wedi defnyddio'r Gymraeg erioed o'r blaen, yn arbennig yn y gweithle. Edrychwch ar staff y Cynulliad. Hoffwn i weld cyflogwyr yn meddwl tipyn bach yn fwy am gyfleoedd i ddysgwyr uchelgeisiol, ymroddgar yn ogystal â siaradwr rhugl pan fyddan nhw'n ystyried hysbysebion swyddi, achos os collwn ni ffydd y dysgwyr, fe gollwn ni'r Gymraeg.