English: I was quite struck by what you just said, leader of the house, in terms of your tour round Wales. I'm very grateful we've had a conversation as well about you and your officials coming down to some of our communities in Carmarthenshire that are facing the frustrations that will be shared by many people and many Members across this Parliament. I'm grateful for that, but I'm very struck by you saying that, actually, communities that you, Welsh Government, thought had been connected, you find by going to these public meetings aren't. That is, at a national scale, I suppose, a parallel experience to what individual constituents of ours have felt, haven't they? They've been given information by Openreach about dates of the provision of the service and, of course, then the goalposts shift ad infinitum. Is there going to be any financial penalty as a result of that? Do you share the anger that some of the constituents felt in the way that you've been misled, and then you come to those communities and you find that out, actually, and you understand how those people feel? I'd like to know a little bit about what the consequences are for Openreach, in terms of the way that they have, by their own admission actually, in front of the Economy, Infrastructure and Skills Committee, communicated appallingly. I accused them of lying, and they weren't very happy with that. We can choose our own language for it, but, unfortunately, what you've said confirms the experience of many constituents. In terms of the money that you referred to in your statement, you said that, of the £80 million, £62.5 million will be used to fund the Superfast Cymru successor project. Perhaps you could remind us what the other £17.5 million will be used for. What's the relationship of that money to the £31.5 million that you mentioned in the Wales infrastructure investment plan? You mentioned full fibre. We've talked a little bit about this. To what extent, in the next wave of the UK Government's programme in this area, and the bidding process, do you see the potential for an all-Wales bid? There have been some localised and regionalised bids within Wales, but do you see some advantage of building a kind of digital fibre spine in the whole of Wales and connecting as many communities as possible at once? I was quite interested in the comments that you made about Powys, et cetera, in terms of fibre to the premises. A year ago, in the last figures that I looked at, I think Kingston was at 50 per cent of fibre to the premises, probably because of their unique history of public ownership - Kingston Communications as was, or KCOM now. That allowed Hull City Council to build up its infrastructure. The Counsel General floated this possibility - it was in the Plaid Cymru manifesto - of a publicly owned telecommunications infrastructure and broadband company. Is this something that the Welsh Government is actively exploring?
Welsh: Cefais fy synnu gan hyn yr ydych chi newydd ei ddweud, arweinydd y tŷ, ynghylch eich taith o amgylch Gymru. Rwyf yn ddiolchgar iawn ein bod wedi cael sgwrs hefyd amdanoch chi a'ch swyddogion yn dod i lawr i rai o'n cymunedau yn sir Gaerfyrddin sy'n wynebu rhwystredigaethau y bydd nifer o bobl a llawer o Aelodau ar draws y Senedd hon yn eu hwynebu hefyd. Rwyf yn ddiolchgar am hynny, ond cefais fy synnu'n fawr pan ddywedasoch chi eich bod wedi canfod drwy gyfarfodydd cyhoeddus nad oedd y cymunedau yr oeddech chi, Llywodraeth Cymru, yn meddwl eu bod wedi cael eu cysylltu, wedi eu cysylltu o gwbl. Ac ar raddfa genedlaethol, mae'n debyg, bod hwn yn brofiad cyfochrog â'r hyn y mae ein hetholwyr unigol ni wedi ei deimlo, onid yw? Maen nhw wedi cael gwybodaeth gan Openreach am ddyddiadau darparu'r gwasanaeth ac, wrth gwrs, mae'r telerau yn cael eu newid yn ddi-ben-draw. A fydd unrhyw gosb ariannol o ganlyniad i hynny? A ydych chi'n rhannu dicter rhai o'r etholwyr o ran y modd yr ydych chi wedi eich camarwain, ac yna fe ewch chi i'r cymunedau hynny a darganfod hynny a deall sut y mae'r bobl hynny'n teimlo? Hoffwn wybod ychydig am beth fydd y canlyniadau i Openreach. Maen nhw wedi cyfaddef eu hunain eu bod wedi cyfathrebu mewn modd echrydus o flaen y Pwyllgor Economi, Seilwaith a Sgiliau. Fe'u cyhuddais o ddweud celwydd, a doedden nhw ddim yn hapus iawn â hynny. Gallwn ddewis ein hiaith ein hunain ar ei gyfer, ond, yn anffodus, mae'r hyn yr ydych chi wedi'i ddweud yn cadarnhau profiad llawer o'm hetholwyr. O ran yr arian a grybwyllwyd gennych yn eich datganiad, dywedasoch y bydd £62.5 miliwn o'r £80 miliwn yn cael ei ddefnyddio i ariannu prosiect dilynol Cyflymu Cymru. Efallai y gallech ein hatgoffa ar gyfer beth fydd y £17.5 miliwn sy'n weddill yn cael ei ddefnyddio. Beth yw'r berthynas rhwng yr arian hwnnw â'r £31.5 miliwn a grybwyllwyd gennych chi yn y cynllun buddsoddi yn seilwaith Cymru? Fe soniasoch am ffeibr llawn. Rydym wedi siarad ychydig am hyn. I ba raddau, yng ngham nesaf rhaglen Llywodraeth y DU yn y maes hwn, ac yn y broses ymgeisio, ydych chi'n gweld potensial ar gyfer cais Cymru gyfan? Cafwyd rhai ceisiadau lleol a rhanbarthol o fewn Cymru, ond a ydych chi'n gweld rhywfaint o fantais mewn adeiladu rhyw fath o asgwrn cefn ffeibr digidol yng Nghymru gyfan a chysylltu cymaint o gymunedau ag sy'n bosibl ar yr un pryd? Roedd gennyf gryn ddiddordeb yn y sylwadau a wnaethoch ynghylch Powys, ac ati, o ran cael cysylltiad ffeibr i'r adeilad. Flwyddyn yn ôl, yn ôl y ffigurau diweddaraf i mi eu gweld, rwy'n credu roedd gan Kingston 50 y cant o gysylltiad ffeibr i'r safle, mae'n debyg oherwydd eu hanes unigryw o fod â pherchnogaeth gyhoeddus - Kingston Communications oedd yr hen enw, KCOM yn awr. Roedd hynny'n galluogi Cyngor Dinas Hull i gynyddu ei seilwaith. Fe soniodd y Cwnsler Cyffredinol am y posibilrwydd - yr oedd hwn ym maniffesto Plaid Cymru - o sefydlu cwmni seilwaith telathrebu a band eang yn eiddo i'r cyhoedd. A yw hyn yn rhywbeth y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wrthi'n ei archwilio'n ymarferol?