English: Well, I just flatly disagree with that analysis of the problem. Natasha Asghar has set out the traditional predict-and-provide approach to road building: traffic is predicted to increase, therefore we will increase the supply of roads. We've pursued that route for 50 years and that has produced more traffic, longer journeys, people working further away from home, higher levels of air pollution and greater levels of obesity, where we have the most obese children in Europe. That's what that approach has produced. It doesn't work, and I don't intend to keep doing the same thing over and over again. It may make for an easy headline, but it is wrong on the evidence, and it is certainly not aligned with what she was saying last week about the need to take climate change seriously. Both she and Janet Finch-Saunders said in the Chamber last week, 'You need to take bold action', and were fully behind the target of achieving climate change, and she has set out a way of doing the exact opposite. She is quite wrong to say that we are not maintaining roads. In fact, the whole point of this announcement is to reallocate resources towards road maintenance as, as I said, was recommended by unanimous decision of the cross-party committee on the economy in the last Senedd, which recommended we stop building new roads and we prioritise money for maintaining the ones we have - under a Conservative Chair, I might add. On the specific question of the Llanddewi Velfrey to Redstone Cross scheme, as we've said, all schemes where there are currently diggers in the ground will continue, and that is one of them. So, that's one thing at least I hope we can agree on the facts on.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n anghytuno'n llwyr â'r dadansoddiad yna o'r broblem. Mae Natasha Asghar wedi nodi'r dull rhagweld a darparu traddodiadol o adeiladu ffyrdd: rhagwelir y bydd traffig yn cynyddu, felly fe wnawn ni gynyddu'r cyflenwad o ffyrdd. Rydym wedi dilyn y llwybr hwnnw ers 50 mlynedd ac mae hynny wedi cynhyrchu mwy o draffig, teithiau hirach, pobl yn gweithio ymhellach oddi cartref, lefelau uwch o lygredd aer a lefelau uwch o ordewdra, lle mae gennym y plant mwyaf gordew yn Ewrop. Dyna y mae'r dull hwnnw wedi'i gynhyrchu. Nid yw'n gweithio, ac nid wyf i'n bwriadu parhau i wneud yr un peth dro ar ôl tro. Efallai ei fod yn gwneud pennawd hawdd, ond mae'n anghywir ar sail y dystiolaeth, ac yn sicr nid yw'n cyd-fynd â'r hyn yr oedd hi yn ei ddweud yr wythnos diwethaf ynglŷn â'r angen i gymryd newid yn yr hinsawdd o ddifrif. Dywedodd hi a Janet Finch-Saunders yn y Siambr yr wythnos diwethaf, 'Mae angen ichi gymryd camau beiddgar', ac roedden nhw yn gwbl gefnogol i'r targed o gyflawni newid hinsawdd, ac mae hi wedi nodi ffordd o wneud y gwrthwyneb yn union. Mae'n gwbl anghywir dweud nad ydym ni'n cynnal ffyrdd. Yn wir, holl bwynt y cyhoeddiad hwn yw ailddyrannu adnoddau tuag at gynnal a chadw ffyrdd fel yr argymhellwyd, fel y dywedais, gan benderfyniad unfrydol y pwyllgor trawsbleidiol ar yr economi yn y Senedd ddiwethaf, a argymhellodd ein bod yn rhoi'r gorau i adeiladu ffyrdd newydd a'n bod yn blaenoriaethu arian ar gyfer cynnal y rhai sydd gennym - dan Gadeirydd Ceidwadol, os caf i ychwanegu. O ran y cwestiwn penodol am gynllun Llanddewi Felffre i Groesffordd Maencoch, fel yr ydym wedi'i ddweud, bydd pob cynllun lle mae peiriannau cloddio yn y ddaear ar hyn o bryd yn parhau, ac mae hwnnw'n un ohonyn nhw. Felly, dyna un peth o leiaf rwy'n gobeithio y gallwn ni gytuno ar y ffeithiau.