English: This is a budget that we in Plaid Cymru hope to inherit in a little over two months' time, so I will start with those parts that we welcome, although we do believe that the Government could have gone further. The £380 million in addition for the NHS, we welcome that. We welcome any additional funding for health and care at this time, given the acute pressures faced during the pandemic, and also the £50 million for the track and trace work. I'm pleased that the local government hardship fund has received an additional allocation of £207 million, with a further allocation of £224 million for education and housing, and £200 million for business support. That's to be welcomed too. But of course, we know that that is only scratching the surface given the needs of businesses and the Welsh economy, given a year of COVID restrictions. That's where we start to get to the point where I see this budget has not been bold enough. The day after the publication of this budget, over £700 million of additional revenue funding was announced, due to decisions to increase spending in England. So, there is some additional flexibility here, and there is a balance to be struck, isn't there? As I argued as we discussed the third supplementary budget earlier this afternoon, we have supported this element of caution in how additional funds provided during the year should be spent, and the need to hold some funds in reserve rather than spending everything today, as the Conservatives have been encouraging, which is rather irresponsible given how the circumstances of the pandemic have been constantly changing. But when we are talking about a 12-month budget such as this, I think there is room to map out more clearly and, in many ways, more radically how additional funds should be used over the next year. So, I want greater clarity on business support, for example. What next steps are in place? Have the Minister for finance and the Minister for the economy discussed how best to spend the funding that will now be available over and above what was planned for initially? Is continuing with the current level of funding for apprenticeships at a cost of £16.5 million really good enough in this current climate? I wouldn't have thought so, when we know that we're facing a very major challenge in terms of youth unemployment. Surely we should be seeking to increase the number of training places and apprenticeships available. And as a Government in May, we in Plaid Cymru want to introduce an employment guarantee for young people at 16 to 24, alongside an apprenticeship or a college or university course - a modern version of the Roosevelt new deal, with the emphasis on building a green future. I think there was a very real opportunity for the Welsh Government to set out its stall for recovery, yes, but also for providing fairness where that doesn't exist at the moment. I'm concerned, in looking at the figures that we have before us. I see that £1.3 billion is available to be allocated over the next year, according to the Wales fiscal analysis team at Cardiff University. I'm concerned at seeing that while seeing simultaneously that truly vulnerable people are in need now. So, we are of the view that there is funding left to extend free school meals and to freeze council tax - things that truly would make a difference to people. And, yes, it's up to Labour Members to answer to their constituents as to why they voted against the extension of free school meals, and not to prioritise fairness in this way, where we believe that there is a very real opportunity to have done so. But as I say, there was an opportunity to set the Government's stall out for economic recovery here too. Twenty years of leading Welsh Government has seen Labour, I think, failing to lead the kind of transformation that would put the Welsh economy on a path towards higher paid employment, higher skill levels, and so on and so forth, and there is that opportunity now and we must take those opportunities. There's a vision, I think, that's been set out by Plaid Cymru of -
Welsh: Dyma'r gyllideb rydyn ni ym Mhlaid Cymru yn gobeithio ei hetifeddu mewn ychydig dros ddeufis, ac felly mi wnaf i ddechrau efo'r rhannau ohoni rydyn ni'n eu croesawu, er ein bod ni'n credu y gallai'r Llywodraeth fod wedi mynd ymhellach. Y £380 miliwn ychwanegol i'r NHS. Rydyn ni'n croesawu unrhyw arian ychwanegol i iechyd a gofal ar hyn o bryd, o ystyried y pwysau acíwt yn ystod y pandemig, ac felly hefyd y £50 miliwn i'r gwaith olrhain. Dwi'n falch bod y gronfa galedi llywodraeth leol wedi derbyn dyraniad ychwanegol o £207 miliwn, efo dyraniad pellach o £224 miliwn i addysg a thai, a £200 miliwn at gefnogaeth i fusnes. Mae hynny i'w groesawu. Ond wrth gwrs, rydyn ni'n gwybod mai crafu'r wyneb mae hynny'n ei wneud o ran ystyried anghenion busnesau a'r economi Gymreig ar ôl blwyddyn o gyfyngiadau COVID. Fanna rydyn ni'n dechrau cyrraedd at y pwynt lle dwi'n gweld y gyllideb yma fel un sydd ddim yn ddigon beiddgar. Diwrnod ar ôl cyhoeddi'r gyllideb yma, mi gyhoeddwyd dros £700 miliwn o gyllid refeniw ychwanegol o ganlyniad i benderfyniadau i gynyddu gwariant yn Lloegr. Felly, mae yna rywfaint o hyblygrwydd ychwanegol yn fan hyn, ac mae yna falans, onid oes, i'w daro? Fel gwnes i ddadlau wrth i ni drafod y drydedd gyllideb atodol yn gynharach y prynhawn yma, rydyn ni wedi cefnogi'r elfen yma o bwyll yn sut i wario'r arian ychwanegol sydd wedi dod yn ystod y flwyddyn, yr angen i ddal rhywfaint o arian yn ôl yn hytrach na gwario'r cyfan heddiw, fel mae'r Ceidwadwyr wedi bod yn ei annog, sy'n agwedd braidd yn anghyfrifol o ystyried sut mae amgylchiadau'r pandemig wedi bod yn newid o hyd. Ond pan rydyn ni'n sôn am gyllideb flwyddyn gyfan fel hyn, dwi'n meddwl bod yna le i fapio allan yn gliriach ac, mewn sawl ffordd, yn fwy radical sut i ddefnyddio cyllid ychwanegol dros y flwyddyn sydd o'n blaenau ni. Felly, dwi eisiau mwy o eglurder ar gefnogaeth i fusnes, er enghraifft. Pa gamau nesaf sydd i ddod? Ydy'r Gweinidog cyllid a'r Gweinidog economi wedi trafod sut orau i wario'r arian sydd rŵan ar gael uwchlaw'r hyn y cynlluniwyd ar ei gyfer o? Ydy cynnig parhad efo lefel presennol prentisiaethau ar gost o £16.5 miliwn yn wir yn ddigon da yn yr hinsawdd yma? Dwi ddim yn meddwl ei fod o pan rydyn ni'n gwybod ein bod ni'n wynebu her fawr iawn o ran diweithdra ieuenctid. Mi ddylem ni, siawns, fod yn trio cynyddu llefydd hyfforddi a phrentisiaethau rŵan. Ac mewn Llywodraeth o fis Mai, rydyn ni ym Mhlaid Cymru eisiau cyflwyno gwarant cyflogaeth i bobl ifanc 16 i 24 oed, ochr yn ochr â phrentisiaeth neu gwrs coleg neu brifysgol - fersiwn fodern o new deal Roosevelt gyda'r pwyslais ar adeiladu dyfodol gwyrdd. Roedd yna gyfle, dwi'n meddwl, go iawn i Lywodraeth Cymru osod ei stondin ar gyfer adferiad, ond hefyd ar gyfer creu tegwch lle mae yna annhegwch ar hyn o bryd. Dwi'n poeni wrth edrych ar ffigurau sydd gennym ni o'n blaenau. Dwi'n gweld bod £1.3 biliwn ar ôl i'w ddyrannu dros y flwyddyn nesaf, yn ôl y tîm dadansoddi cyllid Cymru ym Mhrifysgol Caerdydd. Dwi'n poeni wrth edrych ar hynny, a gweld ar yr un pryd pobl wirioneddol fregus mewn angen rŵan. Felly, rydyn ni o'r farn bod yna arian ar ôl ar gyfer ymestyn cinio ysgol am ddim ac i rewi'r dreth gyngor - pethau fuasai wir yn gwneud gwahaniaeth i bobl. Ydy, mae fyny i Aelodau Llafur i ateb i'w etholwyr nhw pam eu bod nhw wedi pleidleisio yn erbyn ymestyn cinio ysgol am ddim, ac i beidio penderfynu blaenoriaethu tegwch yn y ffordd yma, lle rydym ni'n meddwl bod yna gyfle gwirioneddol i fod wedi gwneud hynny. Ond fel dwi'n dweud, roedd yna gyfle i osod stondin ar gyfer adferiad economaidd yn fan hyn hefyd. Mae 20 mlynedd o arwain Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gweld Llafur, dwi'n meddwl, yn methu ag arwain y math o drawsnewidiad fyddai yn gosod yr economi Gymreig ar lwybr tuag at swyddi'n talu'n well, sgiliau uwch, ac yn y blaen, ac mae yn gyfle rŵan ac mae'n rhaid cymryd y cyfleon. Mae yna weledigaeth, dwi'n meddwl, yn cael ei gosod gan Blaid Cymru o ddyfodol -