English: It depends on if you listen to someone like Klaus Schwab from the World Economic Forum - or Mark Carney over the past few days - to decide at which pole you are in terms of pessimism or optimism in terms of the potential of automation to destroy jobs. But everyone would accept, of course, in terms of the need for skills, that this is the greatest revolution we have seen for generations. Does the Minister feel that we have a regime that is prepared for this challenge? Because, if we think in traditional terms, in terms of education and skills the trend has been to focus on young people - although lifelong learning is part of your portfolio - and then, in terms of adults, to focus on the unemployed. But, in the context of automation, the greatest need will be to train people who are halfway through their careers, and already in work, to retrain for the positions that will emerge. Now, the system we had for that in the past, we would have called 'adult education'. Wales, at one point, was in the vanguard with adult education, but look at where we are now. Coleg Harlech is in decline as a symbol of a lack of investment - not only in Wales; the same pattern has existed in England too - in terms of evening classes and so on and so forth, where people would go of their own accord to climb the ladder, either in the same sector, or to retrain in preparation for another sector. If we look at the figures, we see Working Wales, the procurement process - some £600 million invested in that. How much is put into community learning? I know that you're currently consulting, or have just concluded a consultation. It's just a few million going to that sector, but, again, that is the sector that is the most appropriate place for doing the work of preparing everyone for the challenge that we are facing. So, will we see a change in the balance? And just finally, Deputy Presiding Officer, just a few further points in terms of the Welsh language. We have discussed this previously: 0.3 per cent, or whatever the figure is now in terms of apprenticeships, provided entirely through the medium of Welsh. That is entirely unacceptable. Can we be given a clear pledge that the provision in terms of apprenticeships will reflect the linguistic reality of Wales, never mind the million Welsh speakers that we are seeking to create for the future? And finally, in terms of employers, could the Minister look at a programme in Singapore that has generated a great deal of interest globally, namely SkillsFuture? It uses employers in the process of predicting the future. It's going to companies in certain sectors who are providing employability advice and saying, 'Can you tell us what skills you as a company, as a business, believe that you will require for the future?' Then they use that information in their skills portal in order to provide more direct information to those people who want to train for the future.
Welsh: Mae'n dibynnu os ŷch chi'n gwrando ar rywun fel Klaus Schwab o'r World Economic Forum - neu Mark Carney yn y dyddiau diwethaf - i ddweud ar ba begwn rŷch chi o ran optimistiaeth neu besimistiaeth o ran potensial awtomeiddio i ddinistrio swyddi. Ond byddai pawb yn derbyn, wrth gwrs, o ran yr angen am sgiliau, mai dyma'r chwyldro mwyaf rydym ni wedi'i weld ers cenedlaethau. A ydy'r Gweinidog yn teimlo bod gyda ni gyfundrefn sy'n barod ar gyfer yr her yma? Oherwydd, os ŷm ni'n meddwl yn draddodiadol, wrth gwrs, o ran y system addysg a hyfforddiant y duedd sydd wedi bod ydy ffocysu ar yr ifanc - er bod dysgu gydol oes yn nheitl eich portffolio - ac wedyn, o ran oedolion, ar bobl sy'n ddi-waith. Ac eto, yng nghyd-destun awtomeiddio, yr angen mwyaf fydd dysgu pobl yng nghanol eu gyrfa, sydd mewn gwaith yn barod, i ailhyfforddi ar gyfer y swyddi a fydd yn dod. Nawr, y system a oedd gyda ni ar gyfer hynny yn y gorffennol byddem ni wedi ei alw'n ddysgu oedolion - adult education. Roedd Cymru, ar un adeg, ar flaen y gad o ran dysgu oedolion. Edrych ar ble rydym ni nawr. Mae Coleg Harlech yn dadfeilio, fel symbol, a dweud y gwir, o ddiffyg buddsoddi - nid yn unig yng Nghymru gyda llaw; mae'r un patrwm wedi bod yn Lloegr - o ran dosbarthiadau nos ac yn y blaen, lle byddai pobl yn mynd eu hunain i ddringo'r ysgol ddilyniant, naill ai yn yr un sector, neu i ailhyfforddi ar gyfer sector arall. Os ŷm ni'n edrych ar y ffigurau, roeddwn i'n gweld Cymru'n Gweithio, y broses gaffael - rhywbeth fel £600 miliwn yn mynd i mewn hwnnw. Faint sy'n mynd i mewn i ddysgu cymunedol? Rydw i'n gwybod eich bod chi'n ymgynghori ar hyn o bryd, neu mae newydd ddod i ben. Ychydig filiynau sy'n mynd i mewn i'r sector yna, ac eto dyna'r sector sydd yn y lle mwyaf addas ar gyfer gwneud y gwaith o baratoi pawb ar gyfer yr her sy'n dod. Felly, a ydym ni'n gallu gweld newid yn y balans? A jest yn olaf, Dirprwy Lywydd, cwpl o bethau eraill o ran y Gymraeg. Hynny yw, rydym ni wedi trafod hyn o'r blaen: 0.3 y cant, neu beth bynnag yw'r ffigur o ran prentisiaethau, sy'n cael eu cynnig yn gyfan gwbl drwy gyfrwng y Gymraeg - cwbl annerbyniol a dweud y gwir. A allwn ni gael addewid pendant y bydd y ddarpariaeth o ran prentisiaethau yn adlewyrchu realiti ieithyddol Cymru, heb sôn am y miliwn o siaradwyr Cymraeg rydym ni eisiau eu creu ar gyfer y dyfodol? Yn olaf, o ran cyflogwyr, a fyddai'r Gweinidog yn gallu edrych ar y rhaglen sydd yn Singapôr, sy'n cael tipyn o ddiddordeb byd-eang, o'r enw SkillsFuture, sydd yn defnyddio cyflogwyr yn y broses o ddarogan y dyfodol? Hynny yw, mae yna gwmnïau ac yn y blaen mewn sectorau, ac maen nhw'n dweud, 'A allwch chi ddweud wrthym ni' - sydd yn y system, yn cynnig cyngor cyflogadwyedd - 'A allwch chi ddweud wrthym ni pa sgiliau rydych chi'n meddwl, fel cwmni, fel busnes, rydych chi'n rhagweld y bydd eu hangen arnoch chi?' Ac mae'n nhw'n defnyddio'r wybodaeth yna yn eu porth sgiliau nhw wedyn er mwyn rhoi gwybodaeth mwy uniongyrchol, efallai, i bobl sydd eisiau hyfforddi ar gyfer y dyfodol.