English: Thank you. Welsh Government officials have worked very closely with our industry stakeholders and other devolved administrations so that we've been able to assess the potential impacts from all ongoing trade negotiations, and obviously that includes the agreement with Australia. I have to say, the entire five years since the European Union referendum, back in June 2016, we have made these points repeatedly and very clear representations to the UK Government for appropriate agricultural safeguards, so that we don't have that very unlevel playing field going forward. I don't think the UK Government were in any doubt about our view regarding the importance of retaining tariffs and quotas on our very sensitive agricultural goods, such as lamb and beef. I've also repeatedly highlighted to the UK Government how this deal could set a precedent. I think you make a very important point: it's not just about the Australia deal, it's about the other trade deals too. In relation to your question around standards, again, we don't want our very high standards to be undermined by countries that might not have the same high standards as ours. I attend an inter-ministerial group with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and other devolved administrations. We've held them probably every six weeks through the last term of Government. The next one now is next Monday - this will be the first one of this term - and we'll be able to reiterate that. If it's taken into account, we will see. On labelling, again, I think that's really important, because people really understand about provenance now, and they want to know where their food is coming from. So, it's very important that any Australian meat should be clearly labelled at sale, so that people can make those decisions and that it can be distinguished from higher standard produce that will also be on the shelves.
Welsh: Diolch. Mae swyddogion Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gweithio'n agos iawn gyda'n rhanddeiliaid yn y diwydiant a gweinyddiaethau datganoledig eraill fel ein bod wedi gallu asesu effeithiau posibl yr holl negodiadau masnach sydd ar y gweill, ac yn amlwg mae hynny'n cynnwys y cytundeb ag Awstralia. Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, yn y pum mlynedd ers refferendwm yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, yn ôl ym mis Mehefin 2016, ein bod wedi cyflwyno'r pwyntiau hyn dro ar ôl tro ac wedi cyflwyno sylwadau clir iawn i Lywodraeth y DU yn galw am fesurau diogelu amaethyddol priodol fel nad oes gennym gystadleuaeth anghyfartal iawn o'r fath yn y dyfodol. Nid wyf yn credu bod unrhyw amheuaeth gan Lywodraeth y DU ynglŷn â'n safbwynt ar bwysigrwydd cadw tariffau a chwotâu ar ein nwyddau amaethyddol sensitif iawn, megis cig oen a chig eidion. Rwyf hefyd wedi tynnu sylw Llywodraeth y DU droeon at sut y gallai'r cytundeb hwn osod cynsail. Rwy'n credu eich bod yn gwneud pwynt pwysig iawn: nid yw'n ymwneud â chytundeb Awstralia yn unig, mae'n ymwneud â'r cytundebau masnach eraill hefyd. Mewn perthynas â'ch cwestiwn ynghylch safonau, unwaith eto, nid ydym eisiau i'n safonau uchel iawn gael eu tanseilio gan wledydd nad oes ganddynt yr un safonau uchel â'n rhai ni. Rwy'n mynychu grŵp rhyngweinidogol gydag Adran yr Amgylchedd, Bwyd a Materion Gwledig a gweinyddiaethau datganoledig eraill. Rydym wedi eu cynnal bob chwe wythnos yn ôl pob tebyg drwy gydol tymor diwethaf y Llywodraeth. Bydd y cyfarfod nesaf ddydd Llun nesaf - hwn fydd y cyntaf y tymor hwn - a byddwn yn gallu ailadrodd hynny. Os caiff ei ystyried, fe gawn weld. Ar labelu, unwaith eto, credaf fod hynny'n bwysig iawn, oherwydd mae pobl yn deall tarddiad yn iawn bellach, ac maent eisiau gwybod o ble y daw eu bwyd. Felly, mae'n bwysig iawn fod unrhyw gig o Awstralia wedi ei labelu'n glir wrth ei werthu, fel y gall pobl wneud y penderfyniadau hynny ac fel y gellir gwahaniaethu rhwng y cynnyrch hwnnw a chynnyrch o safon uwch a fydd ar y silffoedd hefyd.