techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Yes, thank you. Well, I would urge her to seriously consider the use of section 12 of the animal rights Act, because it's obvious, throughout the comments made in this Chamber today, that we need urgent action with regard to this, otherwise we will be falling behind other legislatures and Wales will be looked at as an easy option for these circuses. So, I will mention the fact that we will, as a committee, be returning to this subject in the future, and, again, can I thank all those who contributed to this debate, especially those who brought the petition? And I'll thank Linda again and her supporters for doing just that. Thank you.
Welsh: Ie, diolch. Wel, buaswn yn ei hannog o ddifrif i ystyried y defnydd o adran 12 o'r Ddeddf hawliau anifeiliaid, oherwydd mae'n amlwg o'r holl sylwadau a wnaed yn y Siambr hon heddiw fod angen gweithredu ar fyrder mewn perthynas â hyn, fel arall byddwn yn llusgo ar ôl deddfwrfeydd eraill a bydd Cymru yn cael ei gweld fel opsiwn hawdd i'r syrcasau hyn. Felly, rwyf am sôn am y ffaith y byddwn, fel pwyllgor, yn dychwelyd at y pwnc hwn yn y dyfodol, ac unwaith eto, a gaf fi ddiolch i bawb a gyfrannodd i'r ddadl hon, yn enwedig y rhai a gyflwynodd y ddeiseb? A hoffwn ddiolch eto i Linda a'i chefnogwyr am wneud hynny. Diolch.
English: We now reach the debate on the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee report on the scrutiny of regulations made under the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill. I call on Mick Antoniw, the Chair of the committee, to move the motion. Mick Antoniw.
Welsh: Dyma ni'n cyrraedd y ddadl ar adroddiad y Pwyllgor Materion Cyfansoddiadol a Deddfwriaethol ynghylch craffu ar reoliadau a wnaed o dan Fesur yr Undeb Ewropeaidd (Ymadael). Rydw i'n galw ar Mick Antoniw, Cadeirydd y Pwyllgor, i wneud y cynnig. Mick Antoniw.
English: First I would like thank the Chair of the committee, the Assembly Member for Pontypridd, for his work on this report. I'd also like to thank all of the team that supports the committee for all their efforts in this regard and, finally, my fellow committee members whom, I know, have put a lot of time, effort and thought into this report. My contribution today is going to be relatively short, as I have to agree with a lot of what my fellow committee members have already contributed to this report and to this debate. The part of the report that I would like to highlight, because I do feel it is of great importance, is the sifting mechanism for the House of Commons now contained within this Bill. It is a positive step towards improving the level of scrutiny attached to subordinate legislation to be made under the Bill. I hope all Members would agree that, from the evidence gathered in this report, it is clear that the same sifting mechanism should apply here at the National Assembly. This report recommends that the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee should be the sifting committee for the Assembly. It is something that we, as committee, have discussed in great depth and find it would be the most pragmatic approach to dealing with the anticipated volume of subordinate legislation to come before this institution. Thank you.
Welsh: Yn gyntaf hoffwn ddiolch i Gadeirydd y Pwyllgor, yr Aelod Cynulliad dros Bontypridd, am ei waith ar yr adroddiad hwn. Hoffwn hefyd ddiolch i bawb o'r tîm sy'n cefnogi'r pwyllgor am eu hymdrechion yn hyn o beth ac yn olaf, i fy nghyd-aelodau ar y pwyllgor, y gwn eu bod wedi rhoi llawer o amser, ymdrech a meddwl tuag at yr adroddiad hwn. Mae fy nghyfraniad heddiw yn mynd i fod yn gymharol fyr, gan fod yn rhaid i mi gytuno â llawer o'r hyn y mae fy nghyd-aelodau o'r pwyllgor eisoes wedi ei gyfrannu i'r adroddiad hwn ac at y ddadl. Y rhan o'r adroddiad yr hoffwn dynnu sylw ati, oherwydd fy mod yn teimlo ei bod o bwys mawr, yw'r dull sifftio ar gyfer Tŷ'r Cyffredin sydd bellach wedi'i gynnwys yn y Bil hwn. Mae'n gam cadarnhaol tuag at wella lefel y craffu sydd ynghlwm wrth is-ddeddfwriaeth a wneir o dan y Bil. Rwy'n gobeithio y byddai pob Aelod yn cytuno, o'r dystiolaeth a gasglwyd yn yr adroddiad hwn, ei bod hi'n amlwg y dylai'r un dull sifftio gael ei gymhwyso yma yn y Cynulliad Cenedlaethol. Mae'r adroddiad hwn yn argymell mai'r Pwyllgor Materion Cyfansoddiadol a Deddfwriaethol a ddylai fod yn bwyllgor sifftio ar gyfer y Cynulliad. Mae'n rhywbeth rydym ni, fel pwyllgor, wedi'i drafod yn fanwl iawn ac rydym yn ystyried mai dyma fyddai'r dull mwyaf ymarferol o ymdrin â'r holl is-ddeddfwriaeth y mae disgwyl iddi ddod gerbron y sefydliad hwn. Diolch.
English: It is a check and balance, and you will be making all the initial recommendations, which will then be sifted. Also, all this work is going to be done well before exit day, so I'm not quite sure there's the level of urgency, certainly at the volume you are anticipating, and I don't think it's going to be the action of the sift committee to make many calls. It will just be where we really think that something should, in effect, go from negative to affirmative.
Welsh: Dull o wirio cydbwysedd ydyw, a chi fydd yn gwneud yr holl argymhellion cychwynnol, a fydd yn cael eu sifftio wedyn. Hefyd, bydd yr holl waith hwn yn cael ei wneud ymhell cyn y diwrnod gadael, felly nid wyf yn hollol siŵr fod yna lefel o frys, yn sicr o'r maint rydych yn ei rhagweld, ac nid wyf yn meddwl mai dull y pwyllgor sifftio o weithredu fydd gwneud llawer o alwadau. Ymwneud yn unig y bydd â ble rydym yn credu o ddifrif y dylai rhywbeth fynd o'r negyddol i'r cadarnhaol mewn gwirionedd.
English: We'll now move to voting time. Unless three Members wish for the bell to be rung, I will now proceed to the vote. Okay, thank you. So, we now move to vote on the Member debate under Standing Order 11.21 on criminal justice, and I call for a vote on the motion tabled in the names of Jenny Rathbone, Jane Hutt, Bethan Sayed, Dai Lloyd, David Melding and Julie Morgan. Open the vote. Close the vote. For the motion 32, four abstentions, eight against. Therefore, the motion is passed.
Welsh: Symudwn ymlaen at y cyfnod pleidleisio. Oni bai bod tri Aelod yn dymuno i'r gloch gael ei chanu, rwyf am fwrw ymlaen i gynnal y bleidlais. Iawn, diolch. Felly, symudwn ymlaen i bleidleisio ar y ddadl Aelodau o dan Reol Sefydlog 11.21 ar gyfiawnder troseddol, a galwaf am bleidlais ar y cynnig a gyflwynwyd yn enwau Jenny Rathbone, Jane Hutt, Bethan Sayed, Dai Lloyd, David Melding a Julie Morgan. Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid y cynnig 32, roedd 4 yn ymatal, ac 8 yn erbyn. Felly, derbyniwyd y cynnig.
English: We now move to the short debate. We're now moving to the short debate. Will Members who are leaving the Chamber please do so or resume your seats? Thank you. I now call the short debate, and I call on Julie Morgan to speak on the topic she has chosen. Julie.
Welsh: Symudwn yn awr at y ddadl fer. Rydym yn symud yn awr at y ddadl fer. A wnaiff yr Aelodau sy'n gadael y Siambr wneud hynny neu fynd yn ôl i'ch seddau? Diolch. Galwaf am y ddadl fer yn awr, a galwaf ar Julie Morgan i siarad am y pwnc y mae wedi'i ddewis. Julie.
English: Thank you very much, Deputy Presiding Officer. My short debate is entitled 'Secure housing - stable families. Why section 21 needs to be repealed to give greater security to families in the Welsh private rented sector.' I'd like to start by saying 'thank you' to Shelter Cymru for their work and for their help on this subject, and to declare an interest in that my daughter works for Shelter Cymru. I have agreed that Dawn Bowden, Joyce Watson, Mike Hedges and Jenny Rathbone should speak after I've concluded my remarks. So, thank you very much for your interest. So, what is section 21? The Housing Act 1988 halted the creation of Labour's Rent Act 1977 protected tenancies. On 15 January 1989, the assured shorthold tenancy came into force. Alongside, came the procedure to accelerate recovery of possession, namely section 21 of the 1988 Act, which in lay terms is the 'no-fault eviction'. In practice, it means landlords can evict people living in privately rented homes with no reason whatsoever.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Ddirprwy Lywydd. Teitl fy nadl fer yw 'Cartrefi diogel - teuluoedd sefydlog. Pam mae angen diddymu adran 21 i roi mwy o sicrwydd i deuluoedd yn y sector rhentu preifat yng Nghymru.' Hoffwn ddechrau drwy ddiolch i Shelter Cymru am eu gwaith ac am eu cymorth ar y pwnc hwn, ac i ddatgan buddiant am fod fy merch yn gweithio i Shelter Cymru. Rwyf wedi cytuno y dylai Dawn Bowden, Joyce Watson, Mike Hedges a Jenny Rathbone siarad ar ôl i mi orffen fy sylwadau. Felly, diolch yn fawr iawn am eich diddordeb. Felly, beth yw adran 21? Roedd Deddf Tai 1988 yn atal tenantiaethau gwarchodedig dan Ddeddf Rhenti 1977 y Blaid Lafur. Ar 15 Ionawr 1989, daeth y denantiaeth fyrddaliol sicr i rym. Ochr yn ochr â hi, daeth y weithdrefn i gyflymu'r broses o adennill meddiant, sef adran 21 o Ddeddf 1988, sef troi allan 'dim bai' i'r lleygwr. Yn ymarferol, mae'n golygu y gall landlordiaid droi pobl sy'n byw mewn cartrefi rhent preifat allan o'u tai heb unrhyw reswm o gwbl.
English: Well, you didn't tell me who you've given a minute to, so I think it would help if you did.
Welsh: Wel, ni wnaethoch ddweud wrthyf i bwy rydych wedi rhoi munud, felly, rwy'n credu y byddai o gymorth pe baech yn gwneud hynny.
English: I did at the beginning, but -
Welsh: Fe wneuthum ar y dechrau, ond -
English: Oh, sorry, I missed that. I was -
Welsh: O, mae'n ddrwg gennyf, collais hynny. Roeddwn yn -
English: Okay. Fine. Thank you very much. I missed that. I do apologise. Dawn Bowden.
Welsh: Iawn. O'r gorau. Diolch yn fawr iawn. Collais hynny. Mae'n ddrwg gennyf. Dawn Bowden.
English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. Can I thank Julie for giving me a minute of her time in this debate on a really very important issue? Now, Assembly colleagues will be aware that, for some time, I've been raising the profile of the so-called 'sex for rent' problem that can face some of the most vulnerable people who are seeking to find a home. Indeed, the recent broadcast by the reporters on the programme Ein Byd showed the sickening reality of this particular problem, and I was left wondering how many people have faced a no-fault eviction because of this. In reality, if landlords don't have to prove a reason for the eviction, then we may never know. We also hear of section 21 evictions being used when a tenant has done nothing more than to seek repairs to a property. Because, given the high demand for accommodation in our communities, landlords know that another willing tenant who is prepared to put up with poor conditions can easily be found. In both of the circumstances that I've outlined, section 21 can be used by an unscrupulous landlord to rid themselves of tenants who won't comply with unlawful demands or merely seek to exercise their rights. So, in addition to all the reasons outlined by Julie in her submission, these are just two more reasons why I support this motion. Improving the stability of tenure will be another piece of a jigsaw that I'm keen for us to put together, because housing and homes must be an ever higher priority in our work.
Welsh: Diolch ichi, Ddirprwy Lywydd. Hoffwn ddiolch i Julie am roi munud o'i hamser i mi yn y ddadl hon ar fater pwysig iawn. Nawr, bydd cyd-Aelodau'r Cynulliad yn ymwybodol ers cryn amser fy mod wedi bod yn codi proffil y broblem 'rhyw am rent' fel y'i gelwir a all wynebu rhai o'r bobl fwyaf agored i niwed sy'n ceisio dod o hyd i gartref. Yn wir, dangosodd y darllediad diweddar gan y gohebwyr ar raglen Ein Byd realiti ffiaidd y broblem arbennig hon, a gwnaeth i mi feddwl faint o bobl sydd wedi wynebu troi allan 'dim bai' oherwydd hyn. Mewn gwirionedd, os nad oes yn rhaid i landlordiaid brofi rheswm dros droi allan, yna efallai na chawn ni byth wybod. Clywn hefyd am achosion o droi allan dan adran 21 yn cael eu defnyddio pan na fydd tenant wedi gwneud dim mwy na cheisio gofyn am atgyweiriadau i eiddo. Oherwydd, o ystyried y galw uchel am lety yn ein cymunedau, mae landlordiaid yn gwybod y gellir dod o hyd i denant parod arall sy'n barod i ddygymod ag amodau gwael yn rhwydd. Yn y ddau amgylchiad a amlinellais, gellir defnyddio adran 21 gan landlordiaid diegwyddor i gael gwared ar denantiaid nad ydynt yn cydymffurfio â gofynion anghyfreithlon neu sydd ond yn ceisio arfer eu hawliau. Felly, yn ogystal â'r holl resymau a amlinellwyd gan Julie yn ei chyflwyniad, dyma ddau reswm arall pam rwy'n cefnogi'r cynnig hwn. Bydd gwella sefydlogrwydd deiliadaeth yn ddarn arall o'r jig-so rwy'n awyddus inni ei roi at ei gilydd, oherwydd mae'n rhaid i dai a chartrefi fod yn flaenoriaeth uwch byth yn ein gwaith.
English: I thank Julie for bringing this debate. Far from actually asking landlords to meet certain requirements reducing the availability of homes, it will only, actually, in my opinion, get rid of bad landlords, because good landlords will want to honour their commitment to their tenants. They will want to look after their investment, and I know an awful lot of good landlords. I equally know tenants who haven't been grateful for that and destroyed those homes, so what we're really talking about here is a balance. I also know an awful lot of bad landlords and very, very poor housing. So, I think by repealing this, by giving some balance back into the system that is clearly not there at the moment, it is the right way forward, and what we will see, I am fairly confident, is really good landlords coming forward with people having the right to a secure home and a secure tenancy that is well maintained, and that, when they ask for a job to be done, they won't be thrown out on the street to the cost of them, their family and also society, because, at the end of the day, those families to have to be housed. They have a right to be housed, and it's the local authority that is picking up that tab.
Welsh: Diolch i Julie am gyflwyno'r ddadl hon. Ymhell o ofyn i landlordiaid fodloni gofynion penodol gan leihau argaeledd cartrefi mewn gwirionedd, yr hyn y bydd yn ei wneud mewn gwirionedd, yn fy marn i, yw cael gwared ar landlordiaid gwael, oherwydd bydd landlordiaid da am anrhydeddu eu hymrwymiad i'w tenantiaid. Byddant eisiau edrych ar ôl eu buddsoddiad, ac rwy'n adnabod llawer iawn o landlordiaid da. Yn yr un modd rwy'n adnabod tenantiaid nad ydynt wedi bod yn ddiolchgar am hynny ac sydd wedi dinistrio'r cartrefi hynny, felly yr hyn rydym yn sôn amdano yma mewn gwirionedd yw cydbwysedd. Rwyf hefyd yn gwybod am lawer iawn o landlordiaid gwael a thai gwael iawn. Felly, drwy ddiddymu hyn, drwy roi rhywfaint o gydbwysedd yn ôl yn y system nad yw yno ar hyn o bryd mae'n amlwg, dyma'r ffordd iawn ymlaen, a'r hyn a welwn, rwy'n eithaf hyderus, yw landlordiaid da iawn gyda phobl yn cael yr hawl i gartref diogel a thenantiaeth sicr sy'n cael ei gynnal yn dda, ac na fyddant, pan fyddant yn gofyn am i waith gael ei wneud, yn cael eu troi allan i'r stryd er niwed iddynt hwy, i'w teulu a hefyd i gymdeithas, oherwydd, yn y pen draw, mae'n rhaid i'r teuluoedd hynny gael cartrefi. Mae ganddynt hawl i gartref, a'r awdurdod lleol sy'n talu'r gost honno.
English: Can I thank Julie Morgan for bringing this debate? I don't think we talk about housing in this place anywhere near enough. If we talked about it half as much as health, we might have a healthier place. We've had a growth of private rented accommodation and a shortage of accommodation. The pressure is on private renters. Are we really telling people, 'Don't complain, don't object', no matter what the landlord does or how poor the accommodation is, or how many repairs remain to be done, because the landlord can use section 21 to evict you and your children? And, whilst you can try and defend it in court, the likelihood of winning is probably fairly low.
Welsh: Hoffwn ddiolch i Julie Morgan am gyflwyno'r ddadl hon. Nid wyf yn meddwl ein bod yn sôn agos digon am dai yn y lle hwn. Pe baem yn siarad hanner cymaint am dai ag y gwnawn am iechyd, efallai y byddai gennym le iachach. Rydym wedi gweld cynnydd mewn cartrefi rhent preifat a phrinder cartrefi. Mae'r pwysau ar bobl sy'n rhentu'n breifat. A ydym yn dweud wrth bobl o ddifrif, 'Peidiwch â chwyno, peidiwch â gwrthwynebu', ni waeth beth y mae'r landlord yn ei wneud neu pa mor wael yw'r llety, neu faint o waith atgyweirio sy'n dal i'w wneud, oherwydd gall y landlord ddefnyddio adran 21 i'ch troi chi a'ch plant allan? Ac er y gallwch geisio amddiffyn hynny yn y llys, mae'r tebygolrwydd o ennill yn eithaf isel yn ôl pob tebyg.
English: Section 21 gives bad landlords a charter for continuing to poorly maintain their properties, because I've had several cases of tenants being evicted simply because they've asked for the leaking roof to be repaired, or the faulty lock to be repaired, and this is no way of treating people who otherwise behave completely appropriately. But it also - if they think they might be moved on at the landlord's whim, it doesn't give any incentive for the tenant to bed into the property and the community and actually put the paint on the children's bedroom or whatever. So, I think that section 21 should be removed for the reasons that Julie has suggested.
Welsh: Mae adran 21 yn rhoi siarter i landlordiaid gwael barhau i gynnal eu heiddo mewn ffordd wael, oherwydd rwyf wedi cael sawl achos o denantiaid yn cael eu troi allan yn syml oherwydd eu bod wedi gofyn am i'r to sy'n gollwng gael ei atgyweirio, neu drwsio'r clo diffygiol, ac nid dyma'r ffordd i drin pobl sydd fel arall yn ymddwyn yn gwbl briodol. Ond hefyd - os ydynt yn credu efallai y gallent gael eu symud ar fympwy'r landlord, nid yw'n rhoi unrhyw gymhelliant i'r tenant ymgartrefu'n iawn yn yr eiddo ac yn y gymuned a mynd ati mewn gwirionedd i roi paent ar waliau'r plant neu beth bynnag. Felly, rwy'n credu y dylid dileu adran 21 am y rhesymau y mae Julie wedi awgrymu.
English: Thank you very much. Can I now call on the Minister for Housing and Regeneration to reply to the debate? Rebecca Evans.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. A gaf fi alw yn awr ar y Gweinidog Tai ac Adfywio i ymateb i'r ddadl? Rebecca Evans.
English: Thank you very much. I'll ask my question in Welsh, if you'd like to use the interpretation equipment. May I just ask how schools in your regions are using the pupil development grant, and to what extent is it being targeted exclusively at pupils eligible for free school meals?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Gwnaf ofyn fy nghwestiwn yn Gymraeg os ydych chi eisiau defnyddio'r offer cyfieithu. A gaf i jest ofyn sut mae ysgolion yn eich rhanbarthau chi yn defnyddio arian y grant datblygu disgyblion ac i ba raddau maen nhw'n targedu'r arian yna yn ecsgliwsif ar gyfer plant sy'n gymwys ar gyfer cinio ysgol am ddim?
English: Perhaps I'll start, Llyr, and I'm sure colleagues will then want to contribute. The process is that within the guidelines of the grant it's quite clear that they are to be targeted at those learners who are within the guidance. So, one of the processes we carry out annually, as we visit our schools on a termly basis, is that we ask those questions, 'How are you targeting these children accurately? Is the funding having the impact that we would expect? And are those children whom we would expect to benefit benefiting from the grant?' We know that, as a rule, there is effective use of the grant, they do their best and they do focus the grant on those children who should see the progress. But we do see that there are practices that we wouldn't see as best practice, perhaps, and one of our jobs then is to ensure that we share the practice of the best schools with those schools that perhaps aren't aware or haven't been using best practice most effectively. That's something that we do jointly between regions and between schools. So, that's one of the core processes of our work, namely ensuring that they're within the guidance and that they're using the most effective practice.
Welsh: Efallai y gwnaf i ddechrau, Llyr, ac wedyn rwy'n siŵr y bydd fy nghydweithwyr yn gallu cyfrannu. Y broses yw, o fewn canllawiau'r grant, mae'n eithaf clir eu bod nhw i dargedu'r dysgwyr yna sydd o fewn canllawiau'r grant. Felly, un o'r prosesau rŷm ni'n eu gwneud yn flynyddol, wrth i ni ymweld â'n hysgolion yn dymhorol, yw gofyn y cwestiynau yna: 'Sut ydych chi'n targedu'r plant yma yn gywir? A ydy'r arian yn cael yr impact y byddem ni'n moyn iddo fe gael? A ydy'r plant yna - y rhai ni'n moyn i ennill - yn ennill o'i ddefnyddio fe?' Ac rŷm ni'n gwybod, fel arfer, fod yna ddefnydd effeithiol o'r grant. Maen nhw'n gwneud eu gorau i ganolbwyntio'r grant ar y plant a ddylai gael y cynnydd. Ond rŷm ni'n ffeindio bod yna arferion na fyddem ni efallai'n gweld fel yr arferion gorau, ac un o'n jobs ni yw gwneud yn siŵr wedyn ein bod ni'n rhannu'r arferion o'r ysgolion gorau gyda'r ysgolion sydd efallai ddim yn ymwybodol neu sydd heb ddefnyddio'r arferion mwyaf effeithiol. Mae hynny'n rhywbeth rŷm ni'n ei wneud ar y cyd rhwng rhanbarthau a rhwng ysgolion. Felly, mae hynny'n un o'r prosesau, byddwn i'n dweud, sy'n greiddiol i'n gwaith ni - sicrhau eu bod nhw o fewn y canllawiau ac yn defnyddio'r arferion mwyaf effeithiol.
English: There was a risk. Under the previous system there was similar funding in place, before this grant was introduced, and I think that was one of the commonly held perceptions - that it was targeted at those who were underachieving rather than those living in poverty. So, that is something over the years that every region, and I would almost say every school, has worked very carefully on. In terms of this targeting, one could be in receipt of free school meals this year and not next year, and that boundary is very narrow. We do know that many of our children are living in poverty, but aren't in receipt of free school meals. So, I do think that that flexibility within sensible boundaries for schools - because they do know their pupils as a rule. In the best schools, they identify those children and they know which children were in receipt of free school meals last year, or even last term, when we're talking about communities where there is seasonal employment that is affecting parents. So, that flexibility is important, if we can identify the children correctly, so that we don't say 'Well, sorry, you were in receipt of free school meals last week, but you're not this week', because those children have exactly the same needs, of course. So we have to be careful. If we know our pupils well enough and can track them effectively, we can then use that funding flexibly within common-sense boundaries.
Welsh: Mi oedd yna risg. Yn yr hen system roedd arian tebyg, cyllid tebyg, cyn y grant hwn, ac rydw i'n credu roedd hynny'n un o'r canfyddiadau cyffredin, ei fod yn cael ei dargedu at blant a oedd yn tangyflawni yn hytrach na'r plant a oedd yn byw mewn tlodi. Felly, mae hwn yn rhywbeth dros y blynyddoedd, byddwn i'n dweud, y mae pob rhanbarth, a bron byddwn i'n dweud pob ysgol, wedi gweithio yn ofalus iawn arno. Yr ochr arall ynglŷn â'r targedu yma yw y gallai rhywun fod yn derbyn prydau ysgol am ddim eleni ac nid y flwyddyn nesaf. Mae'r ffin yn dynn iawn. Rŷm ni hefyd yn ymwybodol bod lot o'n plant ni yn byw mewn tlodi ond ddim yn derbyn prydau ysgol am ddim. Felly, rydw i'n credu bod yr hyblygrwydd yna, o fewn ffiniau synhwyrol, i ysgolion - maen nhw'n nabod eu plant nhw, fel arfer. Yn yr ysgolion gorau, maen nhw'n nabod y plant yna; maen nhw'n gwybod pwy yw'r plant a oedd yn cael prydau ysgol am ddim y llynedd, neu hyd yn oed tymor diwethaf, mewn cymunedau ble mae yna seasonal employment ac yn y blaen yn effeithio ar beth maen nhw'n gallu - . Felly, mae'r hyblygrwydd yna'n bwysig, os ydym yn nabod ein plant yn iawn, fel nad ydym yn dweud, 'Wel, sori, roeddet ti'n cael prydau ysgol am ddim wythnos diwethaf, ond dwyt ti ddim yr wythnos hon', achos mae'r plant hynny dal â'r un anghenion. Rwy'n credu bod rhaid inni fod yn ofalus, os ydym yn nabod ein plant yn ddigon da, ein bod ni'n eu tracio nhw'n effeithiol a'n bod ni'n gallu defnyddio'r arian yn hyblyg o fewn synnwyr cyffredin yn fanna.