English: Thank you very much for those questions. It is a shame that they do fail to recognise the huge amount of work that has already been going on that has been supported by Government over a long period, not least through the Supporting People grant, which I know both our parties have a particular interest in. So, one example would be the Swansea Young Single Homeless Project. That is an organisation where young people are valued for the contributions they make, and they have fixed-site services called Drws Agored, providing an emergency service for nine homeless young people. So, that's very much at the sharp end of preventing those young people from turning to rough sleeping. And they also offer floating support services to vulnerable young people up to the age of 25, who require some support to maintain their tenancy. That's just one example. I've been to see Llamau also to see the fantastic work that they're doing, also funded by Welsh Government. So, I think it is unfair to suggest that, all of a sudden, we've woken up to the challenge of youth homelessness. Actually, work has been going on in the area of youth homelessness for many years, and we've seen a youth engagement and progression framework every single year, reducing the number of children and young people who are not in employment, education or training. So, I think it does do a disservice to the people working day in, day out in this sector to try and ensure that young people don't become homeless, and the investment that Welsh Government has been making in this agenda for a long period. So, in terms of how we would want to measure those targets, actually I think we need to be realistic and expect, potentially, an increase in the number of people we do identify as being homeless in the short term. That would be as a result of that communications activity that we would be doing and the awareness raising that we would be doing in terms of helping those people working in youth services, in schools and so on, to identify the risk signs that a young person might be rough sleeping. I know many of us were at the launch of the End Youth Homelessness Cymru campaign and we heard there very much and very directly from young people with personal experience of rough sleeping how they felt that the signs that they could be rough sleepers weren't even noticed by those people working most closely with them. On the issue of priority need, I've already committed to commissioning a review of priority need - I understand very much the issues there relating to priority need. However, I would say that young people are very much already considered to be in priority need. So, young people aged 16 or 17, by definition, are considered a priority need, and those between 18 and 20 who are at particular risk of sexual or financial exploitation are also considered to be priority need, as are those people up to the age of 20 who've spent time in care. I'm very interested in what our review of priority need will show us, but those young people are currently considered priority need. And also the issue of local connection will be considered as part of that wider review of priority need, as I've already told the Chamber previously. In terms of input from the wider sector, the ministerial advisory group - or the ministerial task and finish group, I should say - has representation very, very widely across the sector from all organisations, from the youth justice sector to local authorities to the End Youth Homelessness Cymru campaign, and police and so forth. So, it is widely represented in the sector and does very much respond to that point that tackling youth homelessness does have to be a cross-sectoral responsibility. In terms of housing first, those pilots are ongoing. We have now identified additional funding, which I announced recently, for some trailblazer projects that are taking that housing first model to the next level by ensuring that they are working very closely with mental health services, with domestic violence services and with substance misuse services as well, to try and ensure more of an integrated approach to meet those needs of people. Just to finish on this particular point, the housing first network has produced a housing first standards document, which we have agreed now in Welsh Government. So, for a service to consider itself as housing first, it must meet all of those standards, because one of my concerns was that there are some excellent projects out there calling themselves housing first, not adhering to the Welsh Government's housing first principles, and that was a concern. So, whilst rapid rehousing models are very much in need, housing first isn't for everyone, but we do need to stay true to those principles of housing first if we intend to call those projects housing first.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn ichi am y cwestiynau hynny. Mae'n drueni eu bod yn methu â chydnabod y gwaith mawr sydd eisoes wedi'i wneud ar hynny gyda chefnogaeth y Llywodraeth dros gyfnod hir, nid yn lleiaf drwy'r grant Cefnogi Pobl, y gwn fod gan ein dwy blaid ddiddordeb penodol ynddo. Felly, un enghraifft fyddai Prosiect Pobl Ifanc Sengl Ddigartref Abertawe. Dyna sefydliad lle mae pobl ifanc yn cael eu gwerthfawrogi am y cyfraniadau a wnânt, ac mae ganddynt wasanaethau safle sefydlog o'r enw Drws Agored, sy'n darparu gwasanaeth brys ar gyfer naw o bobl ifanc ddigartref. Felly, mae hynny'n wirioneddol yn y rheng flaen o atal pobl ifanc rhag troi i gysgu ar y stryd. Ac maent hefyd yn cynnig gwasanaethau cymorth fel y bo'r angen i bobl ifanc sy'n agored i niwed hyd at 25 oed sydd angen rhywfaint o gymorth i gynnal eu tenantiaeth. Dyna un enghraifft yn unig. Rwyf wedi bod i weld Llamau hefyd i weld y gwaith gwych y maent yn ei wneud, a ariennir hefyd gan Lywodraeth Cymru. Felly, credaf ei bod yn annheg awgrymu, yn sydyn iawn, ein bod wedi deffro i'r her o ddigartrefedd ymhlith pobl ifanc. Mewn gwirionedd, mae gwaith wedi digwydd ym maes digartrefedd ieuenctid ers blynyddoedd lawer, ac rydym wedi gweld fframwaith ymgysylltu a dilyniant ieuenctid bob blwyddyn, gan leihau nifer y plant a phobl ifanc nad ydynt mewn addysg, cyflogaeth na hyfforddiant. Felly, credaf ei fod yn gwneud tro gwael â phobl sy'n gweithio ddydd ar ôl dydd yn y sector hwn i geisio sicrhau nad yw pobl ifanc yn cael eu hun yn ddigartref, a'r buddsoddiad y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi bod yn ei wneud yn yr agenda hon dros gyfnod hir. Felly, o ran sut y byddem eisiau mesur y targedau hynny, mewn gwirionedd credaf fod angen inni fod yn realistig a disgwyl, o bosib, gynnydd yn nifer y bobl yr ydym yn nodi eu bod yn ddigartref yn y tymor byr. Byddai hynny o ganlyniad i'r gweithgaredd cyfathrebu hwnnw y byddem yn ei wneud a'r codi ymwybyddiaeth y byddem yn ei wneud o ran helpu'r bobl hynny sy'n gweithio yn y gwasanaethau ieuenctid, mewn ysgolion ac ati, i nodi'r arwyddion risg y gallai person ifanc fod yn cysgu ar y stryd. Gwn fod llawer ohonom yn lansiad ymgyrch Dileu Digartrefedd Ieuenctid Cymru a chlywsom lawer iawn yno ac yn uniongyrchol iawn gan bobl ifanc sydd â phrofiad personol o gysgu ar y stryd sut yr oeddent yn teimlo nad oedd y b obl hynny a oedd gweithio'n fwyaf agos gyda nhw wedi sylwi hyd yn oed ar yr arwyddion y gallent fod yn cysgu ar y stryd. Ar y mater o angen b laenoriaethol, rwyf eisoes wedi ymrwymo i gomisiynu adolygiad o angen blaenoriaethol - rwy'n deall yn iawn fod materion yno sy'n ymwneud ag angen blaenoriaethol. Fodd bynnag, byddwn yn dweud yr ystyrir bod pobl ifanc eisoes mewn angen blaenoriaethol. Felly, caiff pobl ifanc 16 neu 17 oed, drwy ddiffiniad, eu hystyried yn angen blaenoriaethol, ac ystyrir y rhai rhwng 18 a 20 oed sydd mewn perygl arbennig o gael eu hecsbloetio'n rhywiol neu'n ariannol hefyd yn angen blaenoriaethol, fel y bobl hynny hyd at 20 oed sydd wedi treulio amser mewn gofal. Mae gennyf ddiddordeb mawr yn yr hyn y bydd ein hadolygiad o angen blaenoriaethol yn ei ddangos inni, ond ar hyn o bryd ystyrir y bobl ifanc hynny yn angen blaenoriaethol. A bydd y mater o gysylltiad lleol hefyd yn cael ei ystyried fel rhan o'r adolygiad ehangach hwnnw o angen blaenoriaethol, fel y dywedais eisoes wrth y Siambr o'r blaen. O ran mewnbwn gan y sector ehangach, mae gan y grŵp cynghori gweinidogol - neu'r grŵp gorchwyl a gorffen gweinidogol, dylwn ddweud - gynrychiolaeth eang iawn, iawn ar draws y sector gan yr holl sefydliadau, o'r sector cyfiawnder ieuenctid i awdurdodau lleol i'r ymgyrch Dileu Digartrefedd Ieuenctid Cymru, a'r heddlu ac ati. Felly, caiff ei gynrychioli'n eang yn y sector ac mae'n ymateb yn fawr iawn i'r pwynt hwnnw bod mynd i'r afael â digartrefedd ymhlith pobl ifanc yn gorfod bod yn gyfrifoldeb traws-sector. O ran tai yn gyntaf, mae'r cynlluniau peilot yn mynd rhagddynt. Rydym bellach wedi nodi arian ychwanegol, a gyhoeddais yn ddiweddar, ar gyfer rhai prosiectau blaengar sy'n mynd â'r model tai yn gyntaf hwnnw i'r lefel nesaf, gan sicrhau eu bod yn gweithio'n agos iawn â gwasanaethau iechyd meddwl, â gwasanaethau trais yn y cartref ac â gwasanaethau camddefnyddio sylweddau hefyd, i geisio cael dull mwy integredig o ddiwallu'r anghenion hynny sydd gan bobl. I orffen ar y pwynt penodol hwn, mae'r rhwydwaith tai yn gyntaf wedi cynhyrchu dogfen safonau tai yn gyntaf, yr ydym wedi cytuno arni bellach yn Llywodraeth Cymru. Felly, er mwyn i wasanaeth allu ystyried ei hun yn wasanaeth tai yn gyntaf, rhaid iddo fodloni'r holl safonau hynny. Oherwydd un o'm pryderon oedd bod rhai prosiectau rhagorol yn galw eu hunain yn brosiectau tai yn gyntaf nad oeddent yn glynu at egwyddorion tai yn gyntaf Llywodraeth Cymru, ac roedd hynny'n destun pryder. Felly, er bod angen mawr am fodelau ailgartrefu cyflym iawn, nid yw tai yn gyntaf i bawb. Ond mae angen inni aros yn driw i'r egwyddorion hynny o dai yn gyntaf os ydym yn bwriadu galw'r prosiectau hynny yn brosiectau tai yn gyntaf.