English: As I mentioned earlier, we are looking at a number of different factors or principles, if you like, in terms of whether we provide a report on a specific issue or not. And the three main factors are impact, risk and then resources. So, on impact, we try to focus our resources where they'll be most valuable - so, for example, prioritisng issues where change of law would provide an improvement in the outcome for the environment. Risk, then: we try and focus our resources on deficiencies in the law that have a good chance of having a significant impact if not addressed. And then, in terms of resources, we have to try and investigate matters only where it is proportionate to do so - so, the proportionality too. So, we consider that also, and the impact that that issue can have in terms of the resources that we have in looking into that and comparing it to other issues. What has been clear also is that, if the role asked that a report was generated on every submission, I think that would have been a disadvantage. I think there is a great advantage in looking at it as one piece of work, and looking at the themes that are developing from a number of submissions together. For example, in the first report, that relates to issues relating to forestry, and that responds to two submissions that came in, not one. And since then, more submissions have come in, and then we can take that into consideration as we look at the report. That's very clear in terms of water as well, and water quality. We've had a number of submissions on water quality. So, there is an advantage in grouping issues together and looking at them as a whole in terms of prioritisation too, and bringing all these issues together to perhaps have a more comprehensive report on the issue. That also - . That is what I hope to do with the civil sanctions, because submissions have come in on a number of issues relating to the environment, from biodiversity to water to hedgerows and so forth. There are a number of issues where perhaps we should be looking at how we ensure compliance with something, and how we encourage people not to do these things, and to safeguard the environment to ensure it doesn't happen in the first place. I think it would be very useful to look at the techniques we have within the law - so, to look at that in a number of areas that we have in environmental law, to look at it again as a whole. So, I think that piece of work is going to have an impact on a number of aspects of the environment, not just on one.
Welsh: So, fel rôn i'n ei grybwyll yn gynharach, dŷn ni'n edrych ar sawl ffactor gwahanol neu egwyddorion, os liciwch chi, yn nhermau a ydyn ni yn gwneud adroddiad ar fater penodol neu beidio. A'r tri prif ffactor yw effaith, risg a wedyn adnoddau. So, effaith: dŷn ni'n ceisio ffocysu ein hadnoddau ble byddant mwyaf gwerthfawr - so, er enghraifft, rhoi blaenoriaeth i faterion lle byddai newid cyfraith yn gallu rhoi canlyniad i wella'r amgylchedd. Risg wedyn: rŷn ni'n ceisio ffocysu ein hadnoddau ar ddiffygion yn y gyfraith sydd â siawns da o gael effaith arwyddocaol os na chaiff sylw. A wedyn, o ran adnoddau, mae'n rhaid ceisio ymchwilio i mewn i faterion ond lle mae'n gymesurol i'w wneud, hefyd - so, y proportionality hefyd. So, rŷn ni'n ystyried hwnna hefyd, a'r effaith gall y mater yna ei chael o ran yr adnoddau sydd gyda ni wrth gymesuro hwnna gyda materion eraill. Beth sydd wedi bod yn amlwg hefyd yw, petai'r rôl yn gofyn bod adroddiad yn cael ei wneud ar bob cais sy'n dod i mewn, rwy'n credu byddai hwnna wedi bod yn anfantais. Rwy'n credu bod mantais fawr o edrych arno fe fel cyfanwaith, ac edrych ar ble mae'r themâu sydd yn datblygu o nifer o geisiadau gyda'i gilydd yn dod â ni. Er enghraifft, gyda'r adroddiad cyntaf, mae hwnna'n ymwneud â materion coedwigaeth, ac mae hwnna'n ymateb i ddau gais a ddaeth i mewn, dim un. Ers hynny, mae yna ragor o geisiadau wedi dod i mewn, ac rŷn ni'n gallu wedyn cymryd hynny i mewn i ystyriaeth wrth edrych ar yr adroddiad hwnnw. Mae'n amlwg iawn o ran dŵr, hefyd, a safon dŵr. Rŷn ni wedi cael sawl cais ar hynny. Felly, mae yna fantais o'u grwpio hefyd ac edrych ar y cyfanwaith, os liciwch chi, o ran blaenoriaethu hefyd, a thynnu'r materion at ei gilydd i gael efallai adroddiad mwy cynhwysfawr ar y mater. Mae hwnna hefyd - . Dyna beth dwi'n gobeithio ei wneud gyda'r sancsiynau sifil, achos mae yna nifer o geisiadau sydd wedi dod i mewn ar amryw o bethau yn ymwneud â'r amgylchedd, o fioamrywiaeth i ddŵr i gloddiau, gwrychoedd, ac yn y blaen. Mae yna amryw o faterion ble efallai dylen ni fod yn edrych ar sut rŷn ni'n sicrhau cydymffurfiad â rhywbeth, a sut rydyn ni'n annog pobl i beidio â gwneud y pethau yma, ac i amddiffyn yr amgylchedd trwy wneud yn siŵr dyw e ddim yn digwydd yn y lle cyntaf. Rwy'n credu y byddai'n ddefnyddiol iawn i edrych ar y technegau sydd gyda ni o fewn y gyfraith hefyd - so, edrych ar hwnna dros nifer o wahanol ardaloedd sydd gyda ni o fewn cyfraith amgylcheddol, i edrych arno fe eto fel cyfanwaith. So, dwi'n credu bod y darn yna o waith yn mynd i gael effaith ar sawl agwedd ar yr amgylchedd, dim jest ar un agwedd.