English: I'm grateful to the Cabinet Secretary for the statement and the substance in it. You've already heard, I think, from three members of the Climate Change, Environment and Rural Affairs Committee, and I think Members have determined we would like to do at least a short inquiry on this - likely to be on the full day, Thursday 10 November - and I would like to ask if you'd be available to attend that session, or if that date didn't work, would come in to see us for perhaps an opportunity for a bit more sustained questioning one day either side of that. Obviously, we appreciate you won't want to prejudge the consultation, but there does seem more substance for us to get into following your statement today. I very strongly support your evidence-based approach and what you say on that. I wonder whether you feel the evidence is changing. You did mention the Northern Ireland study and the approach being taken there. Is there any reason to think that arguments for badger culls of one description or another - and I appreciate the English example is less good - that the argument for that has become stronger? I myself voted against the Gloucestershire and Somerset cull in another place, but that was on the understanding that a vaccine was going to be available in the nearer term. Do you think there's been a change in the scientific evidence we need to react to? Could I also just ask: you say that you rule out an English-style cull, with farmers themselves shooting affected and unaffected badgers; is your objection to the farmers themselves doing it, to the shooting or to the indiscriminate nature of affected as well as unaffected badgers? Is it all three, or is there a particular one of those that is of most concern to you? Thank you.
Welsh: Rwy'n ddiolchgar i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet am y datganiad a'r sylwedd ynddo. Rydych chi eisoes wedi clywed, rwy'n credu, gan dri aelod o'r Pwyllgor Newid Hinsawdd, Amgylchedd a Materion Gwledig, a chredaf fod yr Aelodau wedi penderfynu yr hoffem gynnal o leiaf ymholiad byr ar hyn-ar y diwrnod llawn, dydd Iau 10 Tachwedd, yn ôl pob tebyga hoffwn i ofyn a fyddech ar gael i fod yn bresennol yn y sesiwn honno, neu os nad yw'r dyddiad hwnnw yn gyfleus, a fyddech yn dod i'n gweld ni er mwyn i ni gael cyfle efallai i gynnal sesiwn holi estynedig ar ddiwrnod y naill ochr i hynny. Yn amlwg, rydym yn gwerthfawrogi na fyddwch am ragfarnu'r ymgynghoriad, ond ymddengys bod mwy o sylwedd i ni ei drafod yn dilyn eich datganiad heddiw. Cefnogaf yn frwd iawn eich dull wedi'i seilio ar dystiolaeth a'r hyn a ddywedasoch ynglŷn â hynny. Tybed a ydych o'r farn bod y dystiolaeth yn newid. Gwnaethoch sôn am astudiaeth Gogledd Iwerddon a'r dull a ddefnyddir yno. A oes unrhyw reswm dros feddwl bod dadleuon o blaid difa moch daear o ryw fath - ac rwyf yn gwerthfawrogi nad yw enghraifft Lloegr cystal - fod y ddadl am hynny wedi cryfhau? Gwnes innau bleidleisio yn erbyn y difa yn Swydd Gaerloyw a Gwlad yr Haf mewn lle arall, ond yr oedd hynny ar y ddealltwriaeth y byddai brechlyn ar gael yn gynt. A ydych yn credu y bu newid yn y dystiolaeth wyddonol y mae angen i ni ymateb iddi? A gaf i ofyn hefyd: rydych yn dweud eich bod yn diystyru difa trwy ddull Lloegr, lle mae ffermwyr eu hunain saethu moch daear sydd wedi'u heintio a rhai heb eu heintio; a ydych yn erbyn y ffaith bod y ffermwyr eu hunain yn ei wneud, y saethu neu natur ddiwahaniaeth saethu moch daear sydd wedi eu heintio a'r rhai heb eu heintio? A ydych yn erbyn y tri pheth, neu a oes un arbennig sy'n peri'r pryder mwyaf i chi? Diolch.