techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: As he will know, I've not been opposed, in principle, to such a system. There have been no further discussions on it since it was last raised by David Davis with me. I think today is a timely opportunity to look at that once again. But I don't agree with the findings of that report. Everybody says, 'We need to attract professionals.' No-one disagrees with that. But the reality is we need to attract people in many areas of the economy. The reality, if we look at food processing, if we look at our abattoirs, which are not everyone's cup of tea in terms of somewhere to work, is that huge numbers, if not the majority of the workers in those industries, are actually from other countries. If they weren't able to come here, those abattoirs would close and local people who worked there would lose their jobs. That is something that's often overlooked. It's not a question of, 'Well, let's just get the most highly skilled people'; we need the people that the economy needs in order for the economy not just to prosper, but to function.
Welsh: Fel y bydd ef yn gwybod, nid wyf i wedi bod yn erbyn system o'r fath mewn egwyddor. Ni fu trafodaethau pellach ynghylch hyn ers iddo gael ei godi ddiwethaf gan David Davis gyda mi. Rwy'n credu bod heddiw'n gyfle amserol i ystyried hynny unwaith eto. Ond nid wyf yn cytuno â chanfyddiadau'r adroddiad hwnnw. Mae pawb yn dweud, 'Mae angen i ni ddenu gweithwyr proffesiynol.' Does neb yn anghytuno â hynny. Ond y gwir amdani yw bod angen i ni ddenu pobl mewn llawer o feysydd o'r economi. Y gwir amdani, os edrychwn ni ar brosesu bwyd, os edrychwn ni ar ein lladd-dai, nad ydyn nhw at ddant pawb o ran rhywle i weithio ynddo, yw bod niferoedd enfawr, os nad mwyafrif y gweithwyr yn y diwydiannau hynny, yn dod o wledydd eraill mewn gwirionedd. Pe na bydden nhw'n gallu dod yma, byddai'r lladd-dai hynny'n cau a byddai pobl leol a oedd yn gweithio yno yn colli eu swyddi. Mae hynny'n rhywbeth sy'n cael ei anghofio yn aml. Nid yw'n gwestiwn o, 'Wel, gadewch i ni gael y bobl mwyaf medrus yn unig'; rydym ni angen y bobl sydd eu hangen ar yr economi er mwyn i'r economi, nid yn unig ffynnu, ond gweithredu.
English: First Minister, would you agree with me that Wales needs to take advantage of the opportunities presented by Brexit, as well as dealing with the potential adverse consequences? One of those opportunities, in addition to the overseas trade opportunities - which you've already identified, to be fair, as a Government, and you've invested in your overseas offices - is changes to the procurement processes that the Government might use in Wales. Now, clearly, the EU regulations at the moment cause significant problems, particularly for small and medium-sized businesses, which very often want to do business with the public sector. What is your Government doing to look at the procurement processes that are at large here in Wales in the public sector in order to take advantage of the opportunities of leaving the EU?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, a fyddech chi'n cytuno â mi bod angen i Gymru fanteisio ar y cyfleoedd a gyflwynir gan Brexit, yn ogystal ag ymdrin â'r canlyniadau anffafriol posibl? Un o'r cyfleoedd hynny, yn ogystal â'r cyfleoedd masnach dramor - yr ydych chi eisoes wedi eu nodi, a bod yn deg, fel Llywodraeth, ac rydych chi wedi buddsoddi yn eich swyddfeydd tramor - yw newidiadau i'r prosesau caffael y gallai'r Llywodraeth eu defnyddio yng Nghymru. Nawr, yn amlwg, mae rheoliadau'r UE ar hyn o bryd yn achosi problemau sylweddol, yn enwedig i fusnesau bach a chanolig eu maint, sy'n aml iawn eisiau cyflawni busnes gyda'r sector cyhoeddus. Beth mae eich Llywodraeth chi yn ei wneud i edrych ar y prosesau caffael sy'n weithredol yma yng Nghymru yn y sector cyhoeddus er mwyn manteisio ar y cyfleoedd o adael yr UE?
English: Can I thank the Member for his praise for the overseas offices that in previous years we were roundly criticised for opening? But I welcome the conversion. The National Procurement Service has, for some years now, provided an excellent service for businesses to take advantage of procurement opportunities. We've seen, for example, the amount of locally procured services increase in local government and in terms of what we actually procure. Yes, we have to be prepared for what Brexit might throw at us, but, two years on, I can't see exactly what the advantages of Brexit are. I don't see any trade deals on the table, I don't see any opportunities for Welsh exporters that would replace the barriers that we're putting up to the European market, so let's hope that in November there is a deal that's reasonable, a deal that is agreed, and a deal, importantly, that works for Welsh workers.
Welsh: A gaf i ddiolch i'r Aelod am ei ganmoliaeth i'r swyddfeydd tramor a feirniadwyd yn gyffredinol yn y gorffennol am gael eu hagor? Ond croesawaf y dröedigaeth. Ers rhai blynyddoedd bellach, mae'r Gwasanaeth Caffael Cenedlaethol wedi darparu gwasanaeth rhagorol i fusnesau fanteisio ar gyfleoedd caffael. Rydym ni wedi gweld, er enghraifft, nifer y gwasanaethau sy'n cael eu caffael yn lleol yn cynyddu mewn llywodraeth leol ac o ran yr hyn yr ydym ni'n ei gaffael mewn gwirionedd. Oes, mae'n rhaid i ni fod yn barod am yr hyn y gallai Brexit ei daflu atom ni, ond, ddwy flynedd yn ddiweddarach, ni allaf weld beth yn union yw manteision Brexit. Nid wyf i'n gweld unrhyw gytundebau masnachu ar y bwrdd, nid wyf i'n gweld unrhyw gyfleoedd i allforwyr Cymru a fyddai'n disodli'r rhwystrau yr ydym ni'n eu codi i'r farchnad Ewropeaidd, felly gadewch i ni obeithio y bydd cytundeb sy'n rhesymol ym mis Tachwedd, cytundeb a gytunir, a chytundeb, yn bwysig, sy'n gweithio i weithwyr Cymru.
English: First Minister, do you agree with the Trades Union Congress general secretary, Frances O'Grady, who said last week that workers' rights and employment protection are at risk under Brexit and the alarming prospect of a 'no deal'? Do you agree that a 'no deal' would be disastrous for workers in Wales?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, a ydych chi'n cytuno ag ysgrifennydd cyffredinol Cyngres yr Undebau Llafur, Frances O'Grady, a ddywedodd yr wythnos diwethaf bod hawliau gweithwyr a mesurau diogelu cyflogaeth mewn perygl o dan Brexit a'r posibilrwydd brawychus o 'ddim cytundeb'? A ydych chi'n cytuno y byddai 'dim cytundeb' yn drychinebus i weithwyr yng Nghymru?
English: Well, of course, the deception is that, two years ago, at the time of the referendum, nobody said - nobody said, even those staunch leavers - 'Of course, there'll be no deal'. No-one said that. Everyone said that of course there'll be a deal, the EU will fall over itself to give us a deal and the German car manufacturers will ride to our rescue - I met with some of them a fortnight ago, and they're not going to do that - and force the hand of the German Government and, therefore, the European Union. It hasn't happened. It hasn't happened, and this is what we all feared, at the time, two years ago. If we cannot strike a deal with our closest, biggest market that we already have substantial regulatory alignment with, we've got no chance of doing it with anyone else - no chance. People talk of a free trade deal with New Zealand; well, fine, but New Zealand is a market with only 4.8 million people and it's 12,000 miles away. It will never replace the European market of 450 million, with whom we have a land border, and that's sometimes overlooked. So, yes, by all means, look at other free trade agreements, but the reality is, unless we get our relationship with Europe right, nothing else will work.
Welsh: Wel, wrth gwrs, y twyll yw, ddwy flynedd yn ôl, ar adeg y refferendwm, ni ddywedodd neb - ni ddywedodd neb, hyd yn oed y cefnogwyr diwyro dros ymadael - 'Wrth gwrs ni fydd unrhyw gytundeb'. Ddywedodd neb hynny. Dywedodd pawb wrth gwrs y bydd cytundeb, bydd yr UE yn awyddus dros ben i roi cytundeb i ni a bydd gweithgynhyrchwyr ceir yr Almaen yn dod i'n hachub - cefais gyfarfod â rhai ohonyn nhw bythefnos yn ôl, a dydyn nhw ddim yn mynd i wneud hynny - a gorfodi llaw Llywodraeth yr Almaen ac, felly, yr Undeb Ewropeaidd. Nid yw hynny wedi digwydd. Nid yw wedi digwydd, a dyma'r oeddem ni i gyd yn ei ofni, ar y pryd, ddwy flynedd yn ôl. Os na allwn ni daro bargen gyda'n marchnad agosaf, fwyaf y mae gennym ni aliniad rheoleiddio sylweddol â hi eisoes, nid oes gennym ni unrhyw siawns o'i wneud â neb arall - dim siawns. Mae pobl yn sôn am gytundeb masnach rydd gyda Seland Newydd; wel, iawn, ond mae Seland Newydd yn farchnad â dim ond 4.8 miliwn o bobl ac mae 12,000 o filltiroedd i ffwrdd. Ni fydd byth yn disodli'r farchnad Ewropeaidd o 450 miliwn, y mae gennym ni ffin dir â hi, ac weithiau mae hynny'n cael ei anghofio. Felly, ie, ar bob cyfrif, edrychwch ar gytundebau masnach rydd eraill, ond y gwir amdani yw, os na chawn ni ein perthynas gydag Ewrop yn iawn, ni fydd dim byd arall yn gweithio.
English: Our approach to improving cancer survival is set out in the cancer delivery plan for Wales. That includes a specific focus on detecting cancer early, timely access to treatment and the delivery of high-quality care.
Welsh: Cyflwynir ein dull ar gyfer gwella cyfraddau goroesi canser yn y cynllun cyflawni ar ganser Cymru. Mae hwnnw'n cynnwys pwyslais penodol ar ganfod canser yn gynnar, mynediad amserol at driniaeth a'r ddarpariaeth o ofal o ansawdd uchel.
English: Thank you. First Minister, the key to improving the cancer survival rates of Wales's cancer patients is early diagnosis. I have been contacted by a GP expressing concern over the number of cancer referrals that get routinely downgraded by a consultant. The GP who raised this issue with me believes, as I do, that the GP should be informed of this decision so that they can challenge the decision. A GP knows their patient far better than a consultant who has never seen the patient, and while the consultant might have specialist knowledge about cancer, the GP has specialist knowledge about the patient. So, First Minister, will you make it a mandatory requirement that GPs are informed of any decisions to downgrade a cancer referral?
Welsh: Diolch. Prif Weinidog, diagnosis cynnar yw'r peth allweddol i wella cyfraddau goroesi canser cleifion canser Cymru. Cysylltodd meddyg teulu â mi gan fynegi pryder ynghylch nifer yr atgyfeiriadau canser sy'n cael eu hisraddio fel mater o drefn gan feddyg ymgynghorol. Mae'r meddyg teulu a gododd y mater hwn gyda mi yn credu, fel yr wyf innau, y dylai'r meddyg teulu gael ei hysbysu am y penderfyniad hwn fel bod modd iddo herio'r penderfyniad. Mae meddyg teulu yn adnabod ei glaf yn well o lawer na meddyg ymgynghorol sydd erioed wedi gweld y claf, ac er efallai y bydd gan y meddyg ymgynghorol wybodaeth arbenigol am ganser, mae gan y meddyg teulu wybodaeth arbenigol am y claf. Felly, Prif Weinidog, a wnewch chi ei gwneud hi'n ofyniad gorfodol bod meddygon teulu yn cael eu hysbysu am unrhyw benderfyniadau i israddio atgyfeiriad canser?
English: Well, I'm reluctant to step into the place of an oncologist in terms of what that oncologist might think. I would assume that it would be good practice anyway for a GP to be informed of progress with regard to a patient. Now, people have different tumours; they react in different ways with different cancers. We know that, which is why, in the future, it's gene therapy that carries the spark of great hope for many, many people. Whilst I'm surprised to hear about the example - and if she wants to share more information with me, then I'll be glad to look at that - I would think that it would be good practice for the flow of information to be two way.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n amharod i roi fy hun yn lle oncolegydd o ran yr hyn y gallai'r oncolegydd hwnnw ei feddwl. Byddwn yn tybio y byddai'n arfer da beth bynnag i feddyg teulu gael ei hysbysu am gynnydd o ran claf. Nawr, mae gan bobl wahanol diwmorau; maen nhw'n ymateb mewn gwahanol ffyrdd o ran gwahanol ganserau. Rydym ni'n gwybod hynny, a dyna pam, yn y dyfodol, mai therapi genynnau sy'n cario'r fflach o obaith mawr i nifer fawr iawn o bobl. Er fy mod i'n synnu o glywed am yr enghraifft - ac os hoffai rannu mwy o wybodaeth â mi, yna byddwn yn falch o edrych ar hynny - byddwn yn meddwl y byddai'n arfer da i'r llif gwybodaeth fynd y ddwy ffordd.
English: First Minister, for a number of years now, I have used First Minister's questions to ask you to address when your Government plans to meet its cancer waiting time targets, and you have, to be fair, given me regular assurances that it will happen in the very near future. But the latest figures for June 2018 showed that the target for patients referred via the urgent route is being missed by close to 10 per cent. It is clear that one of the barriers to meeting these targets is poor workforce planning for the diagnostic roles. What assurances can you provide that the newly created Health Education and Improvement Wales will focus on more effective workforce planning? And as your tenure as First Minister nears to its end, can I ask one final time: when does your Government aim to meet its cancer waiting time targets?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, ers nifer o flynyddoedd erbyn hwn, rwyf i wedi defnyddio cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog i ofyn i chi nodi pryd y mae eich Llywodraeth yn bwriadu cyrraedd ei thargedau amseroedd aros canser, ac rydych chi, a bod yn deg, wedi rhoi sicrwydd rheolaidd i mi y bydd yn digwydd yn y dyfodol agos iawn. Ond dangosodd y ffigurau diweddaraf ar gyfer mis Mehefin 2018 bod y targed ar gyfer cleifion sy'n cael eu hatgyfeirio drwy'r llwybr brys yn cael ei fethu gan yn agos i 10 y cant. Mae'n amlwg mai un o'r rhwystrau i gyrraedd y targedau hyn yw cynllunio gweithlu gwael ar gyfer y swyddi diagnostig. Pa sicrwydd allwch chi ei roi y bydd y sefydliad Addysg a Gwella Iechyd Cymru sydd newydd gael ei greu yn canolbwyntio ar gynllunio gweithlu mwy effeithiol? Ac wrth i'ch cyfnod fel Prif Weinidog ddirwyn i ben, a gaf i ofyn un tro olaf: pryd mae eich Llywodraeth yn bwriadu cyrraedd ei thargedau amseroedd aros canser?
English: Well, all I can say is that we have the highest survival rates yet reported, and that surely is something that we should welcome - 72.7 per cent of those diagnosed between 2005-09 and 2010-14 survived at least one year, 57.1 per cent are expected to survive at least five years, and premature death caused by cancer has fallen by around 10 per cent in the past decade. Those figures speak for themselves in terms of what's happened with cancer delivery. [ Interruption. ] Well, she talks of targets - that's a fair question - but the answer I give is, 'Look at the results'. The reality is that there are more and more people who are not just being cured - that's five years free of cancer - but also living with cancer in a way that was impossible 10 or 15 years ago, and I think that that is something for us to celebrate. Yes, of course, we want to make sure that more people are seen as quickly as possible, and 85.9 per cent of people newly diagnosed with cancer via the urgent route started definitive treatment within the target time in June, 97.4 per cent of those not via the urgent route. But we can see from the survival rates that things are moving in the right direction.
Welsh: Wel, y cwbl y gallaf i ei ddweud yw bod gennym ni'r cyfraddau goroesi uchaf a adrodd hyd yma, a siawns bod hynny'n rhywbeth y dylem ei groesawu - goroesodd 72.7 y cant o'r rheini a gafodd ddiagnosis rhwng 2005-09 a 2010-14 o leiaf blwyddyn, disgwylir i 57.1 y cant oroesi am o leiaf pum mlynedd, ac mae marwolaethau cynamserol a achoswyd gan ganser wedi gostwng gan oddeutu 10 y cant yn ystod y degawd diwethaf. Mae'r ffigurau hynny yn siarad drostynt eu hunain o ran yr hyn sydd wedi digwydd gyda darpariaeth ganser. [ Torri ar draws. ] Wel, mae hi'n sôn am dargedau - mae hwnnw'n gwestiwn teg - ond yr ateb a roddaf yw, 'Edrychwch ar y canlyniadau'. Y gwir amdani yw bod mwy a mwy o bobl sydd nid yn unig yn cael eu gwella - pum mlynedd yn rhydd o ganser yw hynny - ond hefyd yn byw gyda chanser mewn ffordd a oedd yn amhosibl 10 neu 15 mlynedd yn ôl, ac rwy'n credu bod hynny'n rhywbeth i ni ei ddathlu. Ydym, wrth gwrs, rydym ni eisiau gwneud yn siŵr bod mwy o bobl yn cael eu gweld cyn gynted â phosibl, a dechreuodd 85.9 y cant o bobl sydd newydd gael diagnosis canser drwy'r llwybr brys driniaeth swyddogol o fewn yr amser targed ym mis Mehefin, 97.4 y cant o'r rheini nad oeddent ar y llwybr brys. Ond gallwn weld o'r cyfraddau goroesi bod pethau'n symud i'r cyfeiriad cywir.
English: There was a story in the media yesterday, as it happens, about a patient who had survived cancer but who had found a new growth. There was an application for a PET scan, and that was rejected. The reason for that rejection has not been given, but according to the community health council in north Wales, it's far easier to access PET scans in certain areas than in others. There is inconsistency. Now, as we know that early diagnosis is a key driver when it comes to surviving cancer, isn't it clear that we need, first of all, access that is as swift as possible, particularly for people who have survived cancer in the past, but also that there is clear inconsistency, as we saw with mpMRI scans recently? Will you admit that the lack of consistency means that some people in some parts of Wales have less chance of surviving cancer than others?
Welsh: Mi oedd yna stori yn y wasg ddoe, yn digwydd bod, am glaf a oedd wedi goroesi canser ond a oedd wedi dod o hyd i dyfiant newydd. Mi wnaed cais am brawf PET, ac mi wrthodwyd hynny. Nid oedd rheswm wedi'i roi pam ei fod o wedi cael ei wrthod, ond yn ôl cyngor iechyd cymuned y gogledd, mae'n llawer haws cael mynediad at brofion PET mewn rhai ardaloedd nag mewn ardaloedd eraill. Mae yna anghysondeb. Rŵan, gan ein bod ni'n gwybod bod diagnosis cynnar yn yrrwr allweddol pan mae'n dod at oroesi canser, onid ydy hi'n amlwg bod yn rhaid cael, yn gyntaf, mynediad mor gyflym â phosibl, yn enwedig i bobl sydd wedi cael canser ac wedi goroesi yn y gorffennol, ond hefyd ei bod hi'n amlwg bod yna anghysondeb, fel y gwelsom ni efo profion mpMRI yn ddiweddar? A wnewch chi gyfaddef bod y diffyg cysondeb yna yn golygu bod rhai pobl mewn rhai rhannau o Gymru â llai o siawns o oroesi canser na phobl eraill?
English: No, I don't accept that there's a lack of consistency. I know that the scanners are available - there's one in Cardiff and there's one in Wrexham. We know that the system is not subject to the amount of capacity available. So, there is capacity in the system. It's very difficult, of course, to know the reason, and why the individual was given that response, but there is no evidence that people in north Wales, for example, are in a worse position than those in south Wales. But without knowing all the details, of course, it's very difficult to talk more about it.
Welsh: Na, nid ydw i'n derbyn bod yna ddiffyg cysondeb. Rŷm ni'n gwybod bod y scanners ar gael - mae un yng Nghaerdydd ac mae un yn Wrecsam. Rŷm ni'n gwybod bod y system ddim yn cael ei rheoli ynglŷn â faint o capacity sydd. So, mae yna capacity yn y system. Anodd iawn, wrth gwrs, yw gwybod y rheswm, a pham fod yr unigolyn wedi cael yr ateb yna, ond nid oes yna ddim tystiolaeth i ddangos bod pobl yn y gogledd, er enghraifft, mewn sefyllfa waeth na'r rheini yn y de. Ond heb wybod y manylion, wrth gwrs, mae'n anodd siarad mwy amdano fe.
English: Well, the first thing we'd like is a commitment from the UK Government to provide the money post 2022, because that's not been done yet. We've made a suggestion that the UK Treasury should make that money available - that a pot of money equivalent to the pot of money available for the UK from the EU at the moment should be set to one side and the money distributed in the same way as it is now, unless and until there is agreement across the UK administrations to change the system. On the basis that we will have the money that we were promised, we have of course set out our vision in 'Brexit and our land', our consultation document, and our new land management programme, comprising an economic resilience scheme and a public goods scheme, which will provide support to enhance the benefits that the people of Wales receive from the land.
Welsh: Wel, y peth cyntaf yr hoffem ni ei gael yw ymrwymiad gan Lywodraeth y DU i ddarparu'r arian ar ôl 2022, oherwydd nid yw hynny wedi ei wneud eto. Rydym ni wedi gwneud awgrym y dylai Trysorlys y DU roi'r arian hwnnw ar gael - y dylid gosod pot o arian sy'n gyfwerth â'r pot o arian sydd ar gael i'r DU gan yr UE ar hyn o bryd o'r neilltu a dosbarthu'r arian yn yr un modd ag y gwneir nawr, oni bai a tan y ceir cytundeb ar draws gweinyddiaethau'r DU i newid y system. Ar y sail y bydd gennym ni'r arian a addawyd i ni, rydym ni wrth gwrs wedi cyflwyno ein gweledigaeth yn 'Brexit a'n tir', ein dogfen ymgynghori, ac yn ein rhaglen rheoli tir newydd, sy'n cynnwys cynllun cadernid economaidd a chynllun nwyddau cyhoeddus, a fydd yn darparu cymorth i gynyddu'r manteision y mae pobl Cymru yn eu cael o'r tir.
English: First Minister, unfortunately you can't lay all of the world's ills at the door of the UK Government, much as you might like to, and, of course, when the Welsh Government does get money there are numbers of devolved areas such as farming where it is your responsibility to make sure that adequate funding is there. You'll be well aware of the deep concerns of farmers, certainly farmers I met over the summer at various shows across my constituency, who are very concerned at the current consultation into plans to change the direct payment system. Now, whilst we all accept that there is a consultation there, why is it the case that that consultation did not include an option to retain the current direct payments, albeit in a modified form? Is it not the case that this is not the time to use Brexit as a cover to change the current system, because you wanted to change it all along to squeeze money out of the farming budget and put it elsewhere? This is too much and it's too complex at this point in time.
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, yn anffodus ni allwch chi roi'r bai am holl helbulon y byd ar Lywodraeth y DU, cymaint ag yr hoffech chi wneud hynny, ac, wrth gwrs, pan fydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn cael arian ceir nifer o feysydd datganoledig fel ffermio lle mae'n gyfrifoldeb arnoch chi i wneud yn siŵr bod cyllid digonol ar gael. Byddwch yn gwbl ymwybodol o bryderon dwys ffermwyr, yn sicr ffermwyr y cyfarfûm i â nhw dros yr haf mewn gwahanol sioeau ar draws fy etholaeth, sy'n bryderus iawn am yr ymgynghoriad presennol ar gynlluniau i newid y system taliadau uniongyrchol. Nawr, er ein bod ni i gyd yn derbyn bod ymgynghoriad yn bod, pam mae'n wir nad oedd yr ymgynghoriad hwnnw'n cynnwys dewis i gadw'r taliadau uniongyrchol presennol, ond ar ffurf ddiwygiedig? Onid yw'n wir nad dyma'r amser i ddefnyddio Brexit fel esgus i newid y system bresennol, gan eich bod chi eisiau ei newid o'r cychwyn i wasgu arian allan o'r gyllideb ffermio a'i roi mewn mannau eraill? Mae hyn yn ormod ac yn rhy gymhleth ar yr adeg hon.