English: Thank you. I'd like to thank David Rowlands for his questions and just to reflect, actually, as I know that this has been contentious, and Dai Lloyd quoted Dai Smith in his contribution, and perhaps I'll reflect on another quote of Dai Smith's, when he said that culture should be disruptive. Perhaps these proposals are disruptive, but in the right way because they are focusing attention clearly on how the sector can collaborate more for mutual benefit right across libraries, museums and potentially archives as well, drawing more attention to the fantastic heritage sector that we should be able to boast about in Wales. Indeed, Dai Smith, just as Dai Lloyd said, identified that commercial functions are secondary. Yes, they are of secondary importance, but it doesn't mean that they are anything but vital, especially during a period of such severe financial hardship for many people, for many organisations, for the entire country. In terms of the options and whether this would be another quango, I've been very clear that it should be the steering group that brings forward recommendations for us to then assess and then to consult on publicly. I am conscious of the need to avoid any additional administration or bureaucracy. The whole point of this work is to make sure that all institutions are as free, as flexible, as nimble, but also as creative and determined as possible to benefit from an increase in commercial income and to be more proactive and engaging with more communities and more people who, traditionally, have felt disengaged or distant from cultural institutions for all manner of reasons, whether it be physical or psychological barriers - to overcome those barriers must be a primary objective of the institutions. That's why we set up the Fusion programme, which was aimed at fusing together institutions - cultural institutions - with community groups to harness the power of culture to tackle poverty. I would like to see more of that activity carried out with more partners as well. That's why still I am saying, 'Collaborate more'. At the moment, it's just not good enough. We've got examples of where collaboration has worked, but it's just not enough, I'm afraid. So, we do wish to see a greater degree of collaboration, but it's going to be for the steering group to bring forward recommendations. And you're absolutely right - Cadw did have its best ever year. And it was because of the success of Cadw that we were then able to allocate additional resource to the national museum and the national library. Let's all play to win together, rather than compete within the same team. This is about one sector wanting to be the best in the world, so let's do it as one united team.
Welsh: Diolch. Hoffwn ddiolch i David Rowlands am ei gwestiynau a dim ond eisiau myfyrio, mewn gwirionedd, gan fy mod yn gwybod bod hyn wedi bod yn ddadleuol, ac roedd Dai Lloyd yn dyfynnu Dai Smith yn ei gyfraniad, ac efallai y gwnaf i fyfyrio ar ddyfyniad arall gan Dai Smith, pan ddywedodd y dylai diwylliant fod yn aflonyddgar. Efallai bod y cynigion hyn yn aflonyddgar, ond maent yn aflonyddgar yn y ffordd iawn oherwydd eu bod yn hoelio sylw yn glir ar sut y gall y sector gydweithio mwy er lles pawb ar draws llyfrgelloedd, amgueddfeydd ac o bosibl archifau, hefyd, gan dynnu mwy o sylw at y sector treftadaeth gwych y dylem allu ei frolio yng Nghymru. Yn wir, roedd Dai Smith, yn union fel y dywedodd Dai Lloyd, yn nodi bod swyddogaethau masnachol yn bethau eilaidd. Wrth gwrs maent yn llai pwysig, ond nid yw'n golygu nad ydynt yn gwbl hanfodol, yn enwedig yn ystod cyfnod o galedi ariannol difrifol i lawer o bobl, i lawer o sefydliadau, i'r wlad gyfan. O ran y dewisiadau a ph'un a fyddai hwn yn gwango arall, rwyf wedi bod yn glir iawn mai'r grŵp llywio ddylai fod yn gwneud argymhellion i ni eu hasesu ac yna i ymgynghori arnynt yn gyhoeddus. Rwy'n ymwybodol o'r angen i osgoi unrhyw weinyddiaeth neu fiwrocratiaeth ychwanegol. Holl bwynt y gwaith hwn yw gwneud yn siŵr bod pob sefydliad mor rhydd, mor hyblyg, mor ystwyth, ond hefyd mor greadigol a phenderfynol â phosibl i gael budd o gynnydd mewn incwm masnachol, ac i fod yn fwy rhagweithiol ac ymgysylltu â mwy o gymunedau a mwy o bobl sydd, yn draddodiadol, wedi teimlo eu bod wedi'u hymddieithrio neu'n bell o sefydliadau diwylliannol, a hynny am bob math o resymau, boed yn rhwystrau corfforol neu seicolegol - mae'n rhaid i oresgyn y rhwystrau hynny fod yn amcan sylfaenol y sefydliadau. Dyna pam y sefydlwyd y rhaglen Fusion, oedd â'r nod o asio sefydliadau - sefydliadau diwylliannol - â grwpiau cymunedol i harneisio grym diwylliant i drechu tlodi. Hoffwn weld mwy o'r gweithgarwch hwnnw yn cael ei gynnal gyda mwy o bartneriaid hefyd. Dyna pam yr wyf yn dal i ddweud, 'mae angen mwy o gydweithio'. Ar hyn o bryd, nid yw'n ddigon da. Mae gennym enghreifftiau o ble mae cydweithio wedi gweithio, ond nid yw'n ddigon, rwy'n ofni. Felly, rydym yn dymuno gweld mwy o gydweithio, ond mater i'r grŵp llywio fydd gwneud argymhellion. Ac rydych yn hollol gywir - cafodd Cadw ei blwyddyn orau erioed. Ac oherwydd llwyddiant Cadw yr ydym wedyn wedi gallu dyrannu adnoddau ychwanegol i'r amgueddfa genedlaethol a'r llyfrgell genedlaethol. Gadewch i ni i gyd chwarae i ennill gyda'n gilydd, yn hytrach na chystadlu o fewn yr un tîm. Mae hyn yn ymwneud ag un sector yn awyddus i fod y gorau yn y byd, felly gadewch i ni wneud hynny fel un tîm unedig.