English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. Can I thank the Minister for her statement today, and can I also align myself to the Minister's comments in regard to mental health and the important agenda in that regard as well? Minister, you mentioned your winter plan. I've mentioned a number of times previously that we need to include diagnosis centres, and I wonder if you could confirm whether that will be included in your plan next week. I wonder what efforts you're also making to ensure that investment and resource sharing is provided to primary care to release pressure from GPs and, ultimately, emergency services. How are you also addressing Healthcare Inspectorate Wales's report into ambulance services? I will raise one area that is not mentioned in your statement, that is absent from the statement today, and this is the response to this Chamber about the UK Parliament Health and Social Care Committee's report into the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. This report is almost exclusively centred around the UK Government's response, mentioning Wales only nine times, but it demonstrates, in my view, the urgency of the need for a Wales-specific inquiry. Throughout the pandemic, the First Minister has repeatedly said that Wales was doing things differently. You yourself mentioned the same today in respect of the very report I've just mentioned. So, I will ask: will you make a comment today to the Chamber about a Wales-specific inquiry in the context of what I've just said and this report today? Your Government's decisions, good or bad, have decided the outcome of the pandemic. In relation to my next question, I'll raise a few points here. Wales has the highest death rate across the UK in terms of COVID-19 in terms of the population. The First Minister actually said that he saw no value in testing care homes a full two weeks after the UK Government significantly expanded their testing regime. The then health Minister said: 'I don't understand the rationale in terms of howit saves more lives for the way that the testing policy has been changed in England'. The First Minister then said that face coverings were not a silver bullet, nearly two months after the UK Government introduced mandatory face masks. And finally, the previous health Minister was charged with reducing hospital-acquired infections going through our hospitals last winter, saying that lessons had been learned throughout, and we ended up with nearly a quarter of deaths from COVID picked up from infections in hospitals. These issues here are as a result of Wales doing things differently. There will be good, there will be bad things in terms of Wales doing things differently. But of the areas I've specifically mentioned that I have raised, do you think that they would be adequately addressed in a UK-wide public inquiry? Also, I think your Government needs to learn lessons from the pandemic, as indeed all Government across the UK, of course, need to do. But the Westminster committee raised a very pertinent but valid point, I think, for the Welsh Government, and I quote here: 'The fact that the UK approach reflected a consensus between official scientific advisers and the Government indicates a degree of groupthink that was present at the time which meant we were not as open to approaches being taken elsewhere as we should have been.' So, not open to other opinions. We've heard again today from yourself and the First Minister that Wales was following the science. Was the Government wrong to take this approach? And the final - [ Interruption.] Well, that's a question that is a valid question to be asked. This is a question that's put forward by a cross - [ Interruption.] I can see the Minister laughing. I'm sorry, but this was a question raised by a Westminster inquiry of all parties. I think it's a valid question to ask. I'm not making a suggestion; I'm asking that question that I think need to be addressed today. Finally, Minister, you also mentioned COVID passports. I've been contacted by the National Autistic Society, and they've raised quite important points regarding COVID passes. People with disabilities such as autism are at risk of being discriminated against is the charge that they make, due to being unable to be vaccinated or tested due to behavioural changes or sensory difficulties, and this can cause, of course, as you'll understand, stress if people in those groups think they're being excluded. Routine, of course, is very important for people particularly in that group as well. So, will there be exemptions for people who are unable to vaccinated or tested for medical reasons, as is the case in Scotland, and if not, how do you plan to cater for these specific groups of people, Minister?
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. A gaf i ddiolch i'r Gweinidog am ei datganiad heddiw, ac a gaf i hefyd ategu sylwadau'r Gweinidog o ran iechyd meddwl a'r agenda bwysig yn hynny o beth hefyd? Gweinidog, fe wnaethoch chi sôn am eich cynllun gaeaf. Rwyf i wedi sôn droeon o'r blaen fod angen i ni gynnwys canolfannau diagnosis, a tybed a wnewch chi gadarnhau a fydd hynny'n cael ei gynnwys yn eich cynllun yr wythnos nesaf. Tybed pa ymdrechion yr ydych chi'n eu gwneud hefyd i sicrhau bod buddsoddi a rhannu adnoddau yn cael eu darparu i ofal sylfaenol i ryddhau pwysau ar feddygon teulu ac, yn y pen draw, gwasanaethau brys. Sut ydych chi hefyd yn mynd i ymdrin ag adroddiad Arolygiaeth Gofal Iechyd Cymru ar wasanaethau ambiwlans? Byddaf i'n codi un maes nad yw'n cael ei grybwyll yn eich datganiad, sy'n absennol o'r datganiad heddiw, a hynny yw'r ymateb i'r Siambr hon ynghylch adroddiad Pwyllgor Iechyd a Gofal Cymdeithasol Senedd y DU ar ymdrin â phandemig COVID-19. Mae'r adroddiad hwn yn ymwneud bron yn gyfan gwbl ag ymateb Llywodraeth y DU, gan sôn am Gymru dim ond naw gwaith, ond mae'n dangos, yn fy marn i, frys yr angen am ymchwiliad sy'n benodol i Gymru. Drwy gydol y pandemig, mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi dweud dro ar ôl tro fod Cymru yn gwneud pethau'n wahanol. Fe wnaethoch chi eich hun sôn am yr un peth heddiw o ran yr union adroddiad yr wyf i newydd ei grybwyll. Felly, rwy'n gofyn: a wnewch chi sylw heddiw i'r Siambr am ymchwiliad sy'n benodol i Gymru yng nghyd-destun yr hyn yr wyf i newydd ei ddweud a'r adroddiad hwn heddiw? Mae penderfyniadau eich Llywodraeth, da neu ddrwg, wedi penderfynu ar ganlyniad y pandemig. O ran fy nghwestiwn nesaf, fe wnaf i godi ychydig o bwyntiau yma. Cymru sydd â'r gyfradd marwolaethau uchaf ledled y DU o ran COVID-19 o ran y boblogaeth. Dywedodd y Prif Weinidog mewn gwirionedd nad oedd yn gweld unrhyw werth mewn profi cartrefi gofal bythefnos lawn ar ôl i Lywodraeth y DU ehangu ei threfn brofi yn sylweddol. Dywedodd y Gweinidog iechyd ar y pryd: 'Nid wyf i'n deall y rhesymeg o ran sutmae'n achub mwy o fywydau ar gyfer y ffordd y mae'r polisi profi wedi ei newid yn Lloegr'. Yna, dywedodd y Prif Weinidog nad oedd gorchuddion wyneb yn ateb i bob problem, bron i ddeufis ar ôl i Lywodraeth y DU gyflwyno masgiau wyneb gorfodol. Ac yn olaf, cafodd y Gweinidog iechyd blaenorol y cyfrifoldeb o leihau heintiau a oedd wedi eu dal mewn ysbytai rhag mynd drwy ein hysbytai y gaeaf diwethaf, gan ddweud bod gwersi wedi eu dysgu drwyddi draw, ac yn y pen draw, daeth bron i chwarter y marwolaethau o COVID o heintiau a gafodd eu dal mewn ysbytai. Mae'r materion hyn yma o ganlyniad i Gymru yn gwneud pethau'n wahanol. Bydd pethau da, bydd pethau drwg o ran Cymru yn gwneud pethau'n wahanol. Ond o'r meysydd yr wyf i wedi sôn yn benodol amdanyn nhw, yr wyf i wedi eu codi, a ydych chi' n credu y bydden nhw'n cael sylw digonol mewn ymchwiliad cyhoeddus ledled y DU? Hefyd, rwy'n credu bod angen i'ch Llywodraeth ddysgu gwersi o'r pandemig, fel yn wir y mae angen i bob Llywodraeth ledled y DU ei wneud, wrth gwrs. Ond cododd pwyllgor San Steffan bwynt perthnasol ond dilys iawn, yn fy marn i, i Lywodraeth Cymru, ac rwy'n dyfynnu yma: 'Mae'r ffaith bod dull y DU yn adlewyrchu consensws rhwng cynghorwyr gwyddonol swyddogol a'r Llywodraeth yn dangos rhywfaint o feddwl fel grŵp a oedd yn bresennol ar y pryd a oedd yn golygu nad oeddem ni mor agored i ddulliau a gafodd eu defnyddio mewn mannau eraill fel y dylem ni fod wedi ei wneud.' Felly, nid yn agored i farn arall. Rydym ni wedi clywed eto heddiw gennych chi a'r Prif Weinidog fod Cymru yn dilyn y wyddoniaeth. A oedd y Llywodraeth yn anghywir i fabwysiadu'r dull hwn? A'r cwestiwn olaf - [ Torri ar draws.] Wel, mae hynny'n gwestiwn sy'n gwestiwn dilys i'w ofyn. Mae hwn yn gwestiwn wedi ei gyflwyno gan ymchwiliad traws - [ Torri ar draws.] Rwy'n gallu gweld y Gweinidog yn chwerthin. Mae'n ddrwg gen i, ond roedd hwn yn gwestiwn a gafodd ei godi gan ymchwiliad o bob plaid yn San Steffan. Rwy'n credu ei fod yn gwestiwn dilys i'w ofyn. Nid wyf i'n gwneud awgrym; rwy'n gofyn y cwestiwn hwnnw yr wyf i'n credu bod angen ymdrin ag ef heddiw. Yn olaf, Gweinidog, fe wnaethoch chi sôn hefyd am basbortau COVID. Mae'r Gymdeithas Awtistiaeth Genedlaethol wedi cysylltu â mi, ac maen nhw wedi codi pwyntiau eithaf pwysig ynglŷn â phasys COVID. Mae pobl ag anableddau fel awtistiaeth mewn perygl o fod yn destun gwahaniaethu yw'r honiad y maen nhw'n ei wneud, oherwydd nad ydyn nhw'n gallu cael eu brechu neu eu profi oherwydd newidiadau mewn ymddygiad neu anawsterau synhwyraidd, a gall hyn achosi, wrth gwrs, fel y byddwch chi'n ei ddeall, straen os yw pobl yn y grwpiau hynny yn credu eu bod yn cael eu heithrio. Mae trefn arferol, wrth gwrs, yn bwysig iawn i bobl yn arbennig yn y grŵp hwnnw hefyd. Felly, a fydd eithriadau i bobl nad ydyn nhw'n gallu cael eu brechu neu eu profi am resymau meddygol, fel sy'n wir yn yr Alban, ac os na fydd, sut ydych chi'n bwriadu darparu ar gyfer y grwpiau penodol hyn o bobl, Gweinidog?