English: I'm sure that all Members would love to join with me in welcoming the UK Conservative Government's budget 2021 announcement of an extra £2.5 billion per year, on average, for the Welsh Government through the Barnett formula over the spending review period. And let us not forget that this is on top of its annual baseline funding of £15.9 billion. The Conservatives are giving Wales the largest annual funding settlement since devolution, and still you moan. But are you planning to use it wisely? No. You're paying for school meals for some children of parents on very high incomes, putting unnecessary pressure on the public purse - and we're talking £90 million. You're showing your true socialist colours by wasting £20 million on a universal basic income pilot, and you are reducing the capital budget for health and social care, meaning a lack of investment in the NHS estate and equipment, despite the Welsh NHS Confederation stating that staff are more productive when they have the right, up-to-date equipment to efficiently treat patients. That is not good. COP26 united the world in acknowledging the need to 'keep 1.5 alive' and achieve net zero. This Welsh Government launched the Net Zero Wales carbon budget 2021-25, but it is clear from the budget that not enough is actually being done to protect our environment. There's £37 million allocated to progress the shift to low-emission vehicles; however, Wales is sadly lagging behind much of the United Kingdom when it comes to the installation of fast charging points. In fact, Wales has only four more rapid charging points in the whole country than Milton Keynes, which has a population of just 265,000. Absolute failure. Of the £1.8 billion in capital funding, £1.6 billion is spent on the decarbonisation of housing. Therefore, it's actually reasonable to question how £200 million can be effectively used to combat our climate emergency. The main body to help enhance environmental protection and monitor pollution incidents, Natural Resources Wales, is actually receiving a real terms cut in its funding, remaining the same at £69.7 million for 2022-23. Despite declaring a nature emergency, this budget actually makes it challenging to understand the exact spend in relation to direct benefit for nature. It is really vital that the Welsh Government produces detailed analysis across budget lines as to how this budget actually does combat the nature emergency. In fact, this ambiguity is just further evidence that Wales Environment Link are correct that the scale and pace of action needed to address the nature crisis are simply not in place. The budget does nothing to extend the rates relief for small-scale hydro plants, to encourage investment in such projects. Instead, we have a Welsh Government distracted by working towards the expansion of the state and the creation of Ynni Cymru, a publicly owned energy company for Wales. Have you not learnt the lesson, Minister, from Bristol City Council, which, despite investing £36 million to fund an energy company, went on to sell it for £14 million? But that is rather like this Government spending £52 million on an airport, plus a further £100 million, only to have it valued at £15 million. That is what we're dealing with here. I think you should leave those kinds of ventures to the private sector, where such expertise does flourish, and they have ambition and aspiration. The same goes for the revenue allocation of £1 million to develop Unnos in 2022-23. Honestly, why don't you leave our house building to the developers who actually just want to get on with building those homes that you have failed to allow to be built over the years? Despite Net Zero Wales noting the Welsh Government's expectation that, by 2025, around 148,000 across Wales will receive retrofit measures to reduce heat loss, and a capital allocation of £72 million made in 2022-23 for residential decarbonisation, along with a total revenue allocation -
Welsh: Rwy'n siŵr y byddai pob Aelod wrth ei fodd yn ymuno â mi i groesawu cyhoeddiad cyllideb 2021 Llywodraeth Geidwadol y DU am £2.5 biliwn ychwanegol y flwyddyn, ar gyfartaledd, i Lywodraeth Cymru drwy fformiwla Barnett dros gyfnod yr adolygiad o wariant. A gadewch i ni beidio ag anghofio bod hyn ar ben ei chyllid sylfaenol blynyddol o £15.9 biliwn. Mae'r Ceidwadwyr yn rhoi'r setliad cyllid blynyddol mwyaf i Gymru ers datganoli, ac rydych chi'n dal i fod yn cwyno. Ond ydych chi'n bwriadu ei ddefnyddio'n ddoeth? Nac ydych. Rydych chi'n talu am brydau ysgol i rai plant â rhieni ar incwm uchel iawn, gan roi pwysau diangen ar y pwrs cyhoeddus - ac rydym yn sôn am £90 miliwn. Rydych chi'n dangos eich gwir liwiau sosialaidd drwy wastraffu £20 miliwn ar gynllun treialu incwm sylfaenol cyffredinol, ac rydych chi'n lleihau'r gyllideb gyfalaf ar gyfer iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol, sy'n golygu diffyg buddsoddiad yn ystad ac offer y GIG, er gwaethaf y ffaith bod Cydffederasiwn GIG Cymru yn dweud bod staff yn fwy cynhyrchiol pan fydd ganddyn nhw'r offer cywir, cyfoes i drin cleifion yn effeithlon. Nid yw hynny'n beth da. Fe wnaeth COP26 uno'r byd i gydnabod yr angen i 'gadw 1.5 yn fyw' a chyflawni sero-net. Lansiodd y Llywodraeth Cymru hon gyllideb garbon Cymru Sero Net 2021-25, ond mae'n amlwg o'r gyllideb nad oes digon yn cael ei wneud mewn gwirionedd i ddiogelu ein hamgylchedd. Mae £37 miliwn wedi ei ddyrannu i symud ymlaen â'r newid i gerbydau allyriadau isel; fodd bynnag, yn anffodus, mae Cymru ar ei hôl hi o'i chymharu â llawer o'r Deyrnas Unedig o ran gosod pwyntiau gwefru cyflym. Yn wir, dim ond pedwar yn fwy o bwyntiau gwefru cyflym sydd gan Gymru yn y wlad gyfan na Milton Keynes, sydd â phoblogaeth o 265,000. Methiant llwyr. O'r £1.8 biliwn o gyllid cyfalaf, caiff £1.6 biliwn ei wario ar ddatgarboneiddio tai. Felly, mae'n rhesymol cwestiynu sut y gellir defnyddio £200 miliwn yn effeithiol i fynd i'r afael â'n hargyfwng hinsawdd. Mae'r prif gorff i helpu i wella diogelwch yr amgylchedd a monitro achosion o lygredd, Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru, yn cael toriad mewn termau real yn ei gyllid mewn gwirionedd, sy'n aros yr un fath ar £69.7 miliwn ar gyfer 2022-23. Er gwaethaf datgan argyfwng natur, mae'r gyllideb hon mewn gwirionedd yn ei gwneud yn anodd deall yr union wariant mewn cysylltiad â budd uniongyrchol i natur. Mae'n wirioneddol hanfodol bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn llunio dadansoddiad manwl ar draws llinellau'r gyllideb o ran sut y mae'r gyllideb hon yn mynd i'r afael â'r argyfwng natur mewn gwirionedd. Yn wir, mae'r amwysedd hwn yn dystiolaeth bellach bod Cyswllt Amgylchedd Cymru yn gywir nad yw graddfa a chyflymder y camau y mae eu hangen i fynd i'r afael â'r argyfwng natur ar waith. Nid yw'r gyllideb yn gwneud dim i ymestyn y rhyddhad ardrethi ar gyfer gweithfeydd hydro ar raddfa fach, er mwyn annog buddsoddiad mewn prosiectau o'r fath. Yn hytrach, mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi tynnu ein sylw drwy weithio tuag at ehangu'r wladwriaeth a chreu Ynni Cymru, cwmni ynni sy'n eiddo cyhoeddus i Gymru. Onid ydych chi wedi dysgu'r wers, Gweinidog, gan Gyngor Dinas Bryste, a fuddsoddodd £36 miliwn i ariannu cwmni ynni, ac yna'i werthu am £14 miliwn? Ond mae hynny braidd yn debyg i'r Llywodraeth hon yn gwario £52 miliwn ar faes awyr, ynghyd â £100 miliwn ychwanegol, dim ond iddo gael ei brisio i fod yn werth £15 miliwn. Dyna'r hyn yr ydym yn ymdrin ag ef yma. Rwy'n credu y dylech chi adael y mathau hynny o fentrau i'r sector preifat, lle mae arbenigedd o'r fath yn ffynnu, ac mae ganddyn nhw uchelgais a dyhead. Mae'r un peth yn wir am y dyraniad refeniw o £1 miliwn i ddatblygu Unnos yn 2022-23. A dweud y gwir, pam na wnewch chi adael ein gwaith adeiladu tai i'r datblygwyr sydd am fwrw ati i adeiladu'r cartrefi hynny yr ydych chi wedi methu â chaniatáu iddyn nhw gael eu hadeiladu dros y blynyddoedd? Er gwaethaf y ffaith bod Cymru Sero Net yn nodi disgwyliad Llywodraeth Cymru y bydd tua 148,000 ledled Cymru, erbyn 2025, yn cael mesurau ôl-ffitio i leihau colli gwres, ac y bydd dyraniad cyfalaf o £72 miliwn yn 2022-23 ar gyfer datgarboneiddio preswyl, ynghyd â chyfanswm dyraniad refeniw -