English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. I'll make a short intervention, but I'd give one principal response, really, and that's: what was the tenor of the consultation responses overall? As the Counsel General has said, last May there was a draft code published for consultation. As far as I'm aware, the consultation responses have not been published. I do apologise if this is my IT failure, but I've not been able to get hold of them, and I don't think an analysis has been made available to us of the responses. I do think it would be quite useful, especially as you've said that the code has in fact been amended in light of these responses. However, independently I have seen the RSPCA's response to the consultation and it did have concerns about the prosecution test, which, as you said, was key to the consultation in that it narrows the application of the Welsh Government code compared to the CPS code, which is obviously a point that would need careful thought and either reassurance or rebuttal from your point of view. Finally, I would like to ask whether there's any assessment of the capacity of the Welsh Government to undertake this task and effectively implement the code, given that we will have more Welsh law, presumably, it's getting more distinct, and the duties of prosecution are likely to grow. I certainly agree with you that we need fair and effective implementation of law, otherwise we will not be well governed, so that really does go to the heart of this. In doing that, I'm very mindful that the human rights issues involved when people are confronted with law-breaking and gathering evidence and the like need to be considered very, very carefully as, obviously, they are at the moment in terms of what the Crown Prosecution Service uses.
Welsh: Diolch ichi, Dirprwy Lywydd. Byddaf yn gwneud ymyriad byr, ond mae gennyf un prif ymateb, mewn gwirionedd, a hwnnw yw: beth oedd cywair yr ymatebion i'r ymgynghoriad yn gyffredinol? Fel y dywedodd y Cwnsler Cyffredinol, fis Mai diwethaf cafodd cod drafft ei gyhoeddi ar gyfer ymgynghoriad. Hyd y gwn i, ni chyhoeddwyd yr ymatebion i'r ymgynghoriad. Rwy'n ymddiheuro os fy methiant TG i yw hynny, ond nid wyf wedi llwyddo i gael gafael arnyn nhw, ac nid wy'n credu bod dadansoddiad o'r ymatebion wedi bod ar gael inni. Rwyf i o'r farn y byddai hynny'n ddefnyddiol iawn, yn enwedig gan eich bod wedi dweud bod y cod wedi'i ddiwygio mewn gwirionedd yng ngoleuni'r ymatebion hyn. Eto i gyd, rwyf wedi gweld ymateb yr RSPCA i'r ymgynghoriad ar wahân ac roedd pryderon ynddo am y prawf erlyn, sydd, fel y dywedasoch, yn allweddol i'r ymgynghoriad gan ei fod yn culhau cymhwysiad cod Llywodraeth Cymru o'i gymharu â chod Gwasanaeth Erlyn y Goron. Yn amlwg, mae hwn yn bwynt y byddai angen ystyriaeth ofalus ohono a naill ai sicrwydd neu wrthbrawf o'ch safbwynt chi. Yn olaf, hoffwn i ofyn a oes unrhyw asesiad o allu Llywodraeth Cymru i gyflawni'r dasg hon a gweithredu'r cod yn effeithiol. O ystyried y bydd gennym fwy o gyfraith Cymru, yn ôl pob tebyg, mae'n mynd yn fwy ar wahân, ac mae dyletswyddau erlyn yn debygol o dyfu. Rwy'n cytuno â chi yn sicr fod angen inni sicrhau gweithrediad teg ac effeithiol o'r gyfraith, ni chawn ni ein llywodraethu yn dda fel arall, ac felly yn wir mae hynny'n mynd at galon hyn. Wrth wneud hynny, rwy'n ymwybodol iawn y bydd angen ystyriaeth ofalus iawn, iawn o'r materion hawliau dynol dan sylw pan fydd pobl yn wynebu torcyfraith, ac wrth gasglu tystiolaeth a phethau tebyg, fel sy'n digwydd yn amlwg ar hyn o bryd gyda Gwasanaeth Erlyn y Goron.