techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: The next item is the debate on Stage 4 of the Additional Learning Needs and Education Tribunal (Wales) Bill. I call on the Cabinet Secretary for Education to move the motion - Kirsty Williams.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf yw'r ddadl ar Gyfnod 4 o'r Bil Anghenion Dysgu Ychwanegol a'r Tribiwnlys Addysg (Cymru). Rwy'n galw ar Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Addysg i wneud y cynnig - Kirsty Williams.
English: I call on the Cabinet Secretary for Education to reply to the debate. Kirsty Williams.
Welsh: Galwaf ar Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Addysg i ymateb i'r ddadl. Kirsty Williams.
English: In accordance with Standing Order 26.50C, a recorded vote must be taken on Stage 4 motions. Therefore, I defer voting on this motion until voting time.
Welsh: Yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 26.50C, rhaid cymryd pleidlais wedi'i chofnodi ar gynigion Cyfnod 4. Felly, rwy'n gohirio'r pleidleisio ar y cynnig tan y cyfnod pleidleisio.
English: Unless three Members wish for the bell to be rung, I will proceed directly to voting time.
Welsh: Oni bai bod tri Aelod yn dymuno i fi ganu'r gloch, rydw i'n symud yn syth i'r cyfnod pleidleisio.
English: The first vote is on the debate on the Equality and Human Rights Commission annual review. I call for a vote on amendment 1, tabled in the name of Rhun ap Iorwerth. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 22, no abstentions, 27 against. Two abstentions - I correct myself. Two abstentions, 27 against. Therefore, amendment 1 is not agreed.
Welsh: Mae'r bleidlais gyntaf ar y ddadl ar adolygiad blynyddol y Comisiwn Cydraddoldeb a Hawliau Dynol. Rydw i'n galw am bleidlais ar welliant 1, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Rhun ap Iorwerth. Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid 22, neb yn ymatal, 27 yn erbyn. Dau yn ymatal - rwy'n cywiro fy hun. Dau yn ymatal, 27 yn erbyn. Felly, gwrthodwyd gwelliant 1.
English: I call for a vote on amendment 2, tabled in the name of Paul Davies. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 40, three abstentions, eight against. Therefore, amendment 2 is agreed.
Welsh: Pleidlais, felly, ar welliant 2, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Paul Davies. Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r pleidlais. O blaid 40, tri yn ymatal, wyth yn erbyn. Felly, derbyniwyd gwelliant 2.
English: I call for a vote on amendment 3, tabled in the name of Paul Davies. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 47, no abstentions, three against. Amendment 3 is agreed.
Welsh: Y bleidlais nesaf ar welliant 3, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Paul Davies. Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r pleidlais. O blaid 47, neb yn ymatal, tri yn erbyn. Derbyniwyd gwelliant 3.
English: I call for a vote on amendment 4, tabled in the name of Paul Davies. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 50, no abstentions, no-one against. Therefore, amendment 4 is agreed.
Welsh: Galwaf am bleidlais ar welliant 4, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Paul Davies. Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid 50, neb yn ymatal, neb yn erbyn. Derbyniwyd gwelliant 4.
English: I call for a vote, therefore, on the motion as amended, tabled in the name of Julie James.
Welsh: Pleidlais nawr ar y cynnig wedi'i ddiwygio, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Julie James.
English: Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 51, no abstentions, none against. Therefore, the motion as amended is agreed.
Welsh: Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid 51, neb yn ymatal, neb yn erbyn. Felly, derbyniwyd y cynnig wedi'i ddiwygio.
English: The next vote is on the debate on the Stage 4 of the Additional Learning Needs and Education Tribunal (Wales) Bill. I call for a vote on the motion, tabled in the name of Kirsty Williams. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 50, no abstentions, no-one against. Therefore, the motion is agreed.
Welsh: Mae'r bleidlais nesaf ar Gyfnod 4 y Bil Anghenion Dysgu Ychwanegol a'r Tribiwnlys Addysg (Cymru). Rwy'n galw am bleidlais ar y cynnig a gyflwynwyd yn enw Kirsty Williams. Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid 50, neb yn ymatal, neb yn erbyn. Ac felly derbyniwyd y cynnig.
English: That brings today's proceedings to a close for the day.
Welsh: Dyna ddod â'n trafodion i ben am y dydd.
English: I wanted to seek your views with regard to complaints and whether you agree that removing the requirement to introduce your complaint in written form - that is, to open the door to oral complaints - is a good thing.
Welsh: Roeddwn i eisiau holi eich barn chi am y cwynion a p'un ai a ydych chi'n cytuno bod dileu'r angen i gyflwyno cwynion ysgrifenedig - hynny yw, agor y drws i gwynion llafar - yn beth da.
English: So, in the area in which you work, particularly so, you think that oral complaints will facilitate the process for people.
Welsh: Felly, yn y maes rŷch chi'n gweithio ynddo fo, yn arbennig felly, rŷch chi'n meddwl bod y cwynion ar lafar yn mynd i fod yn hwyluso'r broses i bobl.
English: Yes, we are of the opinion that oral complaints will facilitate the process for vulnerable people and for those people who are very emotional.
Welsh: Ydym, rŷm ni o'r farn y bydd y cwynion ar lafar yn hwyluso'r broses i'r bobl yna sy'n agored i niwed ac sydd yn emosiynol iawn ar y pryd.
English: Do you think that the guidance is sufficiently clear as set out currently?
Welsh: A ydych chi'n meddwl bod y canllawiau yn ddigon clir fel y maen nhw'n cael eu gosod ar hyn o bryd?
English: Yes, I think so, but a couple of things that came to mind when I was going through this: there is an ability for the ombudsman to receive a complaint from somebody else in cases - and the Bill notes this - in a case where the person has died. So, you have to think that perhaps a person - a patient - has presented a complaint orally and then possibly that person has died, and then somebody else would have to undertake that process and take the complaint forward. So, we would want to know more about how that would work to ensure that that verification happens.
Welsh: Ydyn, rwy'n meddwl, ond cwpwl o bethau a ddaeth i'm meddwl i wrth fynd trwy hwn: mae yna allu i'r ombwdsmon dderbyn cwyn gan rywun arall mewn achosion - ac mae'r Bil yn nodi hyn - mewn achosion lle mae'r person efallai wedi marw. So, mae'n rhaid meddwl efallai bod y person - y claf ei hun - wedi cyflwyno cwyn ar lafar ac wedyn mae'n bosib bod y person yna wedi marw, ac wedyn fod rhywun arall yn gorfod ymgymryd â'r gŵyn a mynd â'r gŵyn yna yn ei blaen. Felly, byddem eisiau gwybod mwy am sut y mae hynny'n mynd i weithio i sicrhau bod y verification yna'n digwydd yn ddigon da.
English: And following that in terms of advocacy services, do you believe that there is a need to provide advocacy for individuals making an oral complaint?
Welsh: Ac wedyn o ran eiriolaeth, a ydych yn credu bod angen darparu eiriolaeth i unigolion sydd yn gwneud cwynion llafar?
English: Hospice UK is of the view that everything that opens up the process and makes it more transparent and more accessible for people who want to make complaints, we are of the opinion that anything that improves that system is a good thing. I don't know exactly if there is a need for advocacy as part of the Bill. I know that the complaints-handling procedure is not relevant to hospices, so it's possible that there won't be sufficient guidance there to ensure that a person has access to the ombudsman's services. We also have to consider that people who are receiving palliative care, there are many older people and vulnerable people. There will be people who may have dementia who don't have the capacity. In the majority of cases, perhaps the family or carers will take the complaint forward, but there are people who don't have family or carers, and then it's possible that advocates will be required for them to take a complaint forward.
Welsh: Mae Hospice UK o'r farn bod popeth sy'n agor y broses, sydd yn ei gwneud yn fwy tryloyw ac yn fwy hygyrch i bobl sydd angen gwneud cwynion, rŷm ni o'r farn bod unrhyw beth sy'n gwella'r system yna yn beth da. Nid wyf yn gwybod yn union o ran os oes angen eiriolaeth fel rhan o'r Bil. Rwy'n gwybod nad yw'r complaints-handling procedure yna'n berthnasol i'r hosbisau, felly mae'n bosib na fydd digon o'r guidance yna i sicrhau bod person yn cael mynediad at wasanaethau'r ombwdsmon. Rŷm ni hefyd yn gorfod ystyried bod pobl sydd yn derbyn gofal lliniarol, fod yna lot o bobl hŷn efallai ac maen nhw'n bobl sydd yn agored i niwed. Fe fydd yna bobl efallai sydd â dementia sydd heb capasiti. Yn y rhan fwyaf o achosion, efallai y bydd y teulu neu ofalwyr yn mynd â'r gŵyn yn ei blaen, ond mae yna bobl heb deulu na gofalwyr ac wedyn, mae'n bosib y bydd angen eiriolwyr arnyn nhw i fynd â chwyn yn ei blaen.
English: I'm going to begin with own-initiative investigations, and I'll begin with a question, perhaps, for Dr Kate Chamberlain. In your evidence paper -
Welsh: Rydw i'n mynd i ddechrau efo'r ymchwiliadau ar ei liwt ei hun, a chwestiwn i ddechrau, efallai, i Dr Kate Chamberlain. Yn eich papur tystiolaeth rydych chi'n sôn ei bod hi'n bwysig -
English: Can you hear me now? I'll start again, then. I was talking about the provision for the ombudsman to undertake own-initiative investigations, which is an important part of the Bill, and I wanted to begin with you, Kate, because you state in your evidence that you're concerned that there might be some overlap, and both of you are doing the same things in terms of these investigations. So, could you expand on your concerns?
Welsh: Iawn? A ydych chi'n fy nghlywed i rŵan? Diolch. Gwnaf ddechrau eto. Roeddwn i'n sôn am ddarpariaeth yr ombwdsmon i ymgymryd ag ymchwiliadau yn ôl ei gymhelliant ei hun, sydd yn rhan bwysig o'r Bil. Roeddwn i eisiau cychwyn efo chi, Kate, achos rydych chi'n dweud yn eich tystiolaeth eich bod chi'n poeni efallai y byddai yna orgyffwrdd a dyblygu oherwydd bod gennych chi'r gallu i wneud y math yma o ymchwiliadau. A fedrwch chi ymhelaethu ar hynny?
English: I'll ask you the same question, David, if I may, because you state something similar in your evidence. You talk about the need for there not to be overlap:
Welsh: Mi wna i ofyn yr un cwestiwn i chi, David, achos rydych chi yn dweud rhywbeth tebyg yn eich tystiolaeth chi. Rydych yn sôn am yr angen i beidio â gorgyffwrdd:
English: Okay. I want to bring Gerry in here now. Can you expand a little on some of the practical difficulties that you envisage with these own-initiative investigations?
Welsh: Ocê. Dwi am ddod â Gerry i mewn yn fan hyn rŵan. A fedrwch chi ymhelaethu ychydig ar rai o'r problemau ymarferol fyddwch chi'n eu gweld efo'r ymchwiliadau unigol yma?
English: I'll respond in English, please.
Welsh: Mi wnaf ymateb yn Saesneg, plîs.
English: You mention in your evidence that an example of where this confusion can arise is when the ombudsman has the ability to continue with an investigation despite the complainant not wishing for their complaint to be duly made. Is that a good example of where that confusion can take place?
Welsh: Rydych chi'n sôn yn eich tystiolaeth mai enghraifft o lle mae'r dryswch yma'n gallu codi ydy pan fo gan yr ombwdsmon y gallu i barhau efo ymchwiliad er nad ydy'r achwynydd yn dymuno i'w gŵyn gael ei wneud. Mae honno'n enghraifft dda, a ydy o, o lle fyddai dryswch yn gallu digwydd?
English: Thank you. We have touched a little on this in our discussions. There is one view that this is going to cost more; there is another view that there would be cost savings stemming from working across organisations. What are your views on that? We'll start with Kate, perhaps.
Welsh: Diolch. Rŷm ni wedi cyffwrdd ychydig ar hwn wrth drafod. Mae yna un farn bod hwn yn mynd i gostio mwy, ond mae yna farn arall y byddai arbedion cost yn gallu deillio o weithio ar draws sefydliadau. Beth ydy eich barn chi am hynny? Mi ddechrwn ni efo Kate, efallai.
English: And, Gerry, you've already mentioned the potential increase in oral complaints. Is there any evidence to support that claim that you make that that would lead to greater costs?
Welsh: A, Gerry, rŷch chi wedi sôn yn barod ynglŷn â'r cynnydd potensial mewn cwynion llafar. A oes unrhyw dystiolaeth i gefnogi eich honiad chi eich bod chi'n meddwl efallai bod hynny'n mynd i arwain at fwy o gostau?
English: Good morning. I want to discuss the own-initiative investigations. Clearly, there is work that's undertaken by the auditor general in this area as well. Do you think that the provisions in the Bill are sufficient to ensure that there is no overlap, and that there is sufficient consultation with the auditor general's office before the ombudsman begins his investigations? Perhaps it would be useful to know what's happening at the moment. Is there any sort of joint working in this sort of area at the moment?
Welsh: Bore da. Rydw i eisiau trafod yr ymchwiliadau ar ei liwt ei hun, ac yn amlwg mae yna waith sydd yn digwydd gan yr archwilydd cyffredinol yn y maes yma hefyd. A ydych chi'n credu bod y ddarpariaeth yn y Bil yn ddigon i wneud yn siŵr nad oes yna ddim gorgyffwrdd, a bod yna ddigon o ymgynghori a thrafod efo swyddfa'r archwilydd cyn i'r ombwdsman fynd i wneud ymchwiliadau? Efallai y byddai'n ddefnyddiol gwybod beth sy'n digwydd ar hyn o bryd. A oes yna unrhyw fath o gydweithio o safbwynt y math yma o waith ar hyn o bryd?
English: when 'appropriate'.
Welsh: pan mae'n 'briodol'.
English: Thank you. I note in your written evidence that you state that you think that the numbers of oral complaints and investigations expected appears rather low. So, to begin with, why do you think that the estimate is low?
Welsh: Diolch. Rydw i'n sylwi yn eich tystiolaeth ysgrifenedig chi rydych chi'n dweud hyn, 'Rwyf yn meddwl bod niferoedd y cwynion llafar ac ymchwiliadau a ddisgwylir yn ymddangos braidd yn isel.' I ddechrau, pam ydych chi'n meddwl bod yr amcangyfrif yn isel?
English: Welcome back. I call the Finance Committee to order. We are now moving to the public session with Robert Chote from the Office for Budget Responsibility. Firstly, are there - ? There are apologies from Steffan Lewis and David Rees. Are there any declarations of interest? Just to remind you, there's interpretation on channel 1 and amplification on channel 0.
Welsh: Croeso nôl. Galwaf y Pwyllgor Cyllid i drefn. Rydym ni nawr yn symud at sesiwn gyhoeddus gyda Robert Chote o'r Swyddfa Cyfrifoldeb Cyllidebol. Yn gyntaf oll, a oes unrhyw - ? Mae yna ymddiheuriadau gan Steffan Lewis a David Rees. A oes unrhyw ddatganiad buddiant gan Aelodau? Ac i atgoffa pawb bod cyfieithu ar sianel 1 a'r sain wreiddiol ar sianel 0.
English: I would like to invite Members to note two papers before us. One is the letter from the Cabinet Secretary regarding Welsh Revenue Authority budgets. You'll see how the expenditure profile is changing. Secondly, the Assembly Commission corporate performance report, which is something they're also reporting on. Everyone happy to note those?
Welsh: Os caf i jest ofyn i Aelodau'r Pwyllgor, yn gyntaf, nodi dau bapur sydd gyda ni. Mae un yn llythyr gan Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet ynglŷn â chyllidebau Awdurdod Cyllid Cymru. Byddwch chi'n gweld sut mae'r proffil gwariant ar yr awdurdod hwnnw yn cael ei newid. Ac mae'r ail yn adroddiad ar ddangosyddion perfformiad allweddol corfforaethol y Comisiwn, sydd yn rhywbeth maen nhw'n adrodd hefyd. Pawb yn hapus i'w nodi?
English: Good morning and a warm welcome to this latest meeting of the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee here at the National Assembly for Wales. I'll first of all welcome my fellow Members, and explain that we've received apologies from Lynne Neagle this morning and that we have no substitute for her. May I further explain that this meeting will be held bilingually? Headphones are available for simultaneous interpretation from Welsh to English on channel 1 or for amplification on channel 2. May I remind everyone to either switch off their mobile phones or any other electronic equipment they may have or to turn them to silent, and also tell you that, in the event of a fire alarm, you should follow the directions of the ushers? The microphones will work automatically when you speak, so you won't need to touch any of the buttons.
Welsh: Bore da i chi gyd a chroeso i gyfarfod diweddaraf y Pwyllgor Iechyd, Gofal Cymdeithasol a Chwaraeon yma yng Nghynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru. Fe wnaf i estyn y croeso, yn y lle cyntaf, i fy nghyd-Aelodau, a datgan ein bod ni wedi derbyn ymddiheuriadau oddi wrth Lynne Neagle y bore yma ac nid oes neb yn dirprwyo yn ei lle. Fe allaf bellach egluro bod y cyfarfod yma'n ddwyieithog; gellid defnyddio'r clustffonau i glywed cyfieithu ar y pryd o'r Gymraeg i'r Saesneg ar sianel 1 neu i glywed cyfraniadau yn yr iaith wreiddiol yn well ar sianel 2. A allaf atgoffa pobl naill ai i ddiffodd eu ffonau symudol ac unrhyw gyfarpar electronig arall neu eu rhoi ar y dewis tawel, a hysbysu pobl y dylid dilyn cyfarwyddiadau'r tywyswyr os bydd larwm tân yn canu? Bydd y meicroffonau'n gweithio, hefyd, yn awtomatig pan fyddwch chi'n siarad; nid oes angen cyffwrdd ag unrhyw fotwm.
English: So, moving on to item 2 on this morning's agenda, which is the ongoing scrutiny of the Public Health (Minimum Price for Alcohol) (Wales) Bill. This is evidence session No. 6, and joining us for this morning's first session are representatives of Alcohol Concern Cymru. It's a pleasure to welcome Dr Richard Piper, chief executive of Alcohol Research UK, and also Andrew Misell, director of Alcohol Concern Cymru. A very warm welcome to you both. We have received your written evidence, and, naturally, Members will have read that in detail. So, with your permission, as is our habit, we will move immediately to questions, and the first questions are from Caroline Jones.
Welsh: Felly, symudwn ymlaen i eitem 2 ar agenda'r bore yma, a pharhau â'r craffu ar Fil Iechyd y Cyhoedd (Isafbris am Alcohol) (Cymru). Dyma ydy sesiwn dystiolaeth Rhif 6, ac o'n blaenau, am y sesiwn gyntaf y bore yma, mae cynrychiolwyr o Alcohol Concern Cymru. Yn benodol, felly, mae'n bleser croesawu Dr Richard Piper, prif weithredwr Alcohol Research UK, a hefyd Andrew Misell, cyfarwyddwr Alcohol Concern Cymru. Croeso i chi'ch dau. Rydym wedi derbyn eich tystiolaeth ysgrifenedig ymlaen llaw ac, yn naturiol, mae Aelodau wedi ei darllen mewn manylder. Felly, gyda'ch caniatâd, fel sydd yn draddodiadol, awn ni'n syth i mewn i gwestiynau, ac mae'r cwestiynau cyntaf o dan ofal Caroline Jones.
English: Staying in the same area, if truth be told, do we need to take steps to run in parallel with this Bill in order to recognise the changes, perhaps, that may be required in services - providing greater access to alcohol services and so on - or something on the face of the Bill even?
Welsh: I aros yn yr un maes, mewn difrif, a oes angen camau i gyd-fynd â'r Bil yma er mwyn cydnabod y newid, o bosib, sydd ei angen mewn gwasanaethau - cynnig rhagor o fynediad i bobl i wasanaethau alcohol ac ati - neu rywbeth ar wyneb y Bil hyd yn oed?
English: I'm not sure whether it's something that we would want to include within the Bill; legislation isn't the best way to achieve everything. But certainly, in parallel with this Bill, as I've said, we need some acknowledgement that we need some kind of way out for people. They're living lifestyles that they don't enjoy and that they haven't usually opted for, and we have to make sure that those services are available, as Richard has said, even for those people who are most unwilling to seek help and support. We have to take the support to them.
Welsh: Nid wyf yn siŵr a ydy e'n rhywbeth y buaswn ni eisiau ei gynnwys o fewn y Bil; dim deddfwriaeth yw'r ffordd orau i wneud popeth. Ond yn sicr, i gyd-fynd â'r Mesur yma, mae eisiau, fel rwyf wedi dweud, cydnabyddiaeth bod angen rhyw allanfa i bobl. Maen nhw'n byw bywyd nad ydyn nhw'n ei fwynhau, nad ydyn nhw, fel arfer, wedi ei ddewis, ac mae eisiau inni wneud yn siŵr bod y gwasanaethau yna ar gael, fel mae Richard wedi dweud, hyd yn oed ar gyfer y bobl sy'n amharod iawn i geisio cymorth. Mae eisiau inni fynd â'r cymorth atyn nhw.
English: Has there been sufficient assessment carried out of the impact of introducing legislation such as this on those who are drinking at dangerous or hazardous levels or are even dependent, and the need then to introduce steps by Government to assist those people?
Welsh: A oes yna ddigon o asesu wedi ei wneud o beth fydd effaith cyflwyno deddfwriaeth fel hyn ar bobl sy'n yfed yn beryglus neu bobl sy'n ddibynnol, a'r angen wedyn i gyflwyno camau gan Lywodraeth er mwyn helpu'r rheini?
English: As this is a new Bill - no other country apart from Scotland and Wales have done this exact same thing - there's always an element of guesswork as regards the outcome. There are a few studies that have been undertaken as regards alcohol-dependent people's behaviour when something happens that reduces the amount of alcohol they have access to, but, certainly, more are needed. We need to learn, and I think we have to learn fast. We'll have to prepare and then, as the Bill goes on its journey - and this is where we see our role as a charity - go out into the field and see what's actually happening at the grass roots and how things need to change.
Welsh: Gan fod hwn yn fesur newydd - nid oes un wlad ar wahân i Gymru a'r Alban wedi gwneud yr union un peth yma - mae wastad rhyw elfen o ddyfalu o ran beth ddigwyddiff. Mae yna ychydig o astudiaethaethau wedi bod o ran beth sy'n digwydd i ymddygiad pobl sy'n ddibynnol ar alcohol pan fo rhywbeth yn digwydd i leihau faint maen nhw'n gallu ei gael, ond, yn sicr, mae angen mwy. Bydd eisiau i ni ddysgu, ac rydw i'n meddwl y bydd eisiau i ni ddysgu'n gyflym. Bydd eisiau i ni baratoi, ac wedyn, wrth i'r Mesur fynd ymlaen - a dyma lle yr ydym yn gweld ein lle ni fel sefydliad, fel elsuen - mynd allan i'r maes a gweld beth sy'n digwydd ar lawr gwlad a sut mae angen i bethau newid.
English: And what form should that response take: should it be an alcohol strategy, a strategy for alcohol reduction, or usage reduction, by the Welsh Government, so that it's not just the stick, but you also have the carrot too?
Welsh: Ar ba ffurf ddylai'r ymateb yna fod: strategaeth alcohol, strategaeth lleihau defnydd alcohol gan Lywodraeth Cymru i gyd-fynd â hwn, fel mae nid dim ond y ffon sydd yna, ond bod yn foronen hefyd?
English: Yes, certainly. I don't know whether it will be a strategy - they're talking about having fewer strategies these days, but there will be some kind of document, or some kind of plan, to go hand in hand with this Bill. As I said, we will need to do work at grass-roots level, outreach work with the heaviest and most dependent drinkers, but, of course, that will have to be co-ordinated on a national level, and that's the point that I would make consistently. As Richard has said, there is nobody beyond help; nobody beyond getting better.
Welsh: Yn sicr. Wel, mae - . Nid ydw i'n siŵr os bydd e'n strategaeth - maen nhw'n sôn am gael llai o strategaethau dyddiau hyn, ond bydd yna ryw fath o ddogfen, rhyw gynllun, i gyd-fynd â'r Mesur yma. Fel y dywedais i, bydd angen gwaith ar lawr gwlad i estyn allan i'r yfwyr trymaf, y rhai sydd fwyaf dibynnol ar alcohol, ac, wrth gwrs, bydd eisiau i hynny gael ei gydlynu yn genedlaethol, a dyna'r pwynt y byddwn i yn ei wneud yn gyson. Fel mae Richard wedi'i ddweud, nid oes neb sydd y tu hwnt i gymorth; nid oes neb sydd y tu hwnt i wella.
English: And, briefly, there are companies that are going to profit from this. Supermarkets may charge more for alcohol. Now, is that the source of funding to pay for these services?
Welsh: Ac, yn fyr iawn, mae yna gwmnïau yn mynd i wneud arian allan o hwn. Mae'n bosib bod archfarchnadoedd yn mynd i godi rhagor am alcohol. Ai fanna y mae'r ffynhonnell o arian i dalu am y gwasanaethau alcohol newydd yma?
English: Okay. Dawn next.
Welsh: Iawn. Dawn nesaf.