English: Given the First Minister accepted my correction on the number of Supreme Court judges, I accept his geographical correction with equally good grace. Could I ask him about another potential divergence between UK and Wales policy? At his conference today, there seems to be a big move to change climate change policy and have a policy of net zero by 2030 - that's just 11 years away. Does the First Minister agree with me that that would be an absolute disaster, would lead to a collapse in the economy, even without the group's proposal that we pay reparations for past climate emissions, and that it would undermine any possibility of any joint working with anyone else on this issue? He talks a lot about net zero by 2050, but will he also confirm that the policy of the Welsh Government is not net zero by 2050, but a 90 per cent reduction, as the Committee on Climate Change said it was unachievable to get net zero for Wales? And would he also reflect again on the M4 issue, because we spoke last week about the decision notice? I pointed out that his decision notice on the M4 said nothing whatever about climate change, and twice the First Minister interrupted me and claimed that it did. Fortunately for him, it's only recorded as 'interruption' in our record. But will he reflect again that when he ruled out the M4, he said nothing about climate change in that decision notice, which is the legally binding document, and he did that for good reason, because the inspector concluded that the scheme would, perhaps uniquely, be carbon neutral over time?
Welsh: O gofio bod y Prif Weinidog wedi derbyn fy nghywiriad ar nifer barnwyr y Goruchaf Lys, rwy'n derbyn ei gywiriad daearyddol gyda'r un ewyllys da. A gaf i ei holi am wahaniaeth posibl arall rhwng polisi'r DU a pholisi Cymru? Yn ei gynhadledd heddiw, mae'n ymddangos bod symudiad mawr i newid polisi newid yn yr hinsawdd a chael polisi o sero net erbyn 2030 - dim ond 11 mlynedd i ffwrdd yw hynny. A yw'r Prif Weinidog yn cytuno â mi y byddai hynny'n drychineb llwyr, yn arwain at chwalfa yn yr economi, hyd yn oed heb gynnig y grŵp ein bod ni'n talu iawndal am allyriadau hinsawdd y gorffennol, ac y byddai'n tanseilio unrhyw bosibilrwydd o weithio ar y cyd gydag unrhyw un arall ar y mater hwn? Mae'n sôn llawer am sero net erbyn 2050, ond a wnaiff ef gadarnhau hefyd nad sero net erbyn 2050 yw polisi Llywodraeth Cymru, ond gostyngiad o 90 y cant, gan fod y Pwyllgor Newid Hinsawdd wedi dweud nad oedd yn bosibl sicrhau sero net i Gymru? Ac a wnaiff ef fyfyrio unwaith eto ar fater yr M4, oherwydd fe wnaethom sôn yr wythnos diwethaf am yr hysbysiad o benderfyniad? Dywedais nad oedd ei hysbysiad o benderfyniad am yr M4 yn dweud dim byd o gwbl am y newid yn yr hinsawdd, a thorrodd y Prif Weinidog ar fy nhraws ddwywaith gan honni ei fod. Yn ffodus iddo ef, mae wedi ei gofnodi fel 'torri ar draws' yn unig yn ein cofnod. Ond a wnaiff ef fyfyrio unwaith eto na ddywedodd ddim am y newid yn yr hinsawdd yn yr hysbysiad o benderfyniad hwnnw, sef y ddogfen sy'n rhwymo mewn cyfraith, pan ddiystyrodd yr M4, ac fe wnaeth hynny am reswm da, oherwydd daeth yr arolygydd i'r casgliad y byddai'r cynllun, yn unigryw efallai, yn niwtral o ran carbon dros amser?