techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I thank the Member for that and for his observations. I would just say that I think that this is, as he indicates in his question, a route that is, obviously, laid down in statute for clarifying issues of constitutional law. The reason for the intervention was not really in relation to the specifics of the Scottish Bill. Clearly, that is a matter for the Lord Advocate in Scotland to make the case in defence of the Scottish Bill. My comments about competence were my own comments in that sense. But the way in which the Attorney-General had set out the case took us beyond, in my view, the narrow issues relating to the Scottish Bill and, indeed, even to the Scottish devolution settlement itself. There are, obviously, in particular following the entry into force of the last Wales Act, now greater similarities than there were in the past. So, the approach that I have taken is, generally speaking, not to reiterate the points that the Lord Advocate made in defence of the Scottish Bill, but to confine the case on behalf of the Welsh Government to broader constitutional principles that affect the devolution settlement here in Wales. I felt that that was important to bring focus, really, to ensuring that the concerns of Welsh Government and of this place, I hope, were heard in a context that was germane and specific to the Welsh experience and Welsh settlement.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am hynny ac am ei sylwadau. Byddwn yn dweud fy mod yn credu bod hwn, fel y mae'n ei ddweud yn ei gwestiwn, yn llwybr, sydd, yn amlwg, wedi'i bennu mewn statud er mwyn egluro materion o gyfraith gyfansoddiadol. Nid oedd y rheswm am yr ymyriad yn ymwneud mewn gwirionedd ag agweddau penodol ar Fil yr Alban. Yn amlwg, mater i Arglwydd Adfocad yn yr Alban yw gwneud yr achos er mwyn amddiffyn Bil yr Alban. Fy sylwadau fy hun oedd fy sylwadau am gymhwysedd yn hynny o beth. Ond aeth y ffordd y gosododd y Twrnai Cyffredinol yr achos â ni y tu hwnt, yn fy marn i, i faterion cul yn ymwneud â Bil yr Alban ac, yn wir, hyd yn oed i setliad datganoli'r Alban ei hun. Yn amlwg, yn enwedig ar ôl i'r Ddeddf Cymru ddiwethaf ddod i rym, ceir mwy o debygrwydd nag oedd yn y gorffennol. Felly, y dull o weithredu yr wyf wedi'i gymryd, a siarad yn gyffredinol, yw peidio ag ailadrodd y pwyntiau a wnaeth yr Arglwydd Adfocad wrth amddiffyniad Bil yr Alban, ond yn hytrach, cyfyngu'r achos ar ran Llywodraeth Cymru i egwyddorion cyfansoddiadol ehangach sy'n effeithio ar y setliad datganoli yma yng Nghymru. Roeddwn yn teimlo ei bod yn bwysig tynnu'r pwyslais at hynny, mewn gwirionedd, i sicrhau bod pryderon Llywodraeth Cymru a'r lle hwn, rwy'n gobeithio, wedi eu clywed mewn cyd-destun a oedd yn berthnasol ac yn benodol i brofiad Cymru a setliad Cymru.
English: 'to "pool" any of those powers through common UK wide frameworks.'
Welsh: '"cyfuno" rhai o'r pwerau hynny drwy fframweithiau cyffredin ledled y DU'.
English: I'd like to thank the Counsel General for his statement. It's very interesting to understand the position for that need to intervene, and I fully support your points. I understand the need to separate the way in which this institution has actually decided upon a consent, based upon the agreement and the amendments, and the Scottish Parliament, as Simon Thomas quite rightly pointed out, took an alternative decision. But you're also focusing upon the implications for devolution and the rights of this Parliament to make a decision on devolved competencies, which you believed we were well within our rights to do on this particular Bill. Have you made an assessment of what if Scotland was also within their rights, and the Supreme Court rules that Scotland was correct in putting that Bill forward, therefore, making it legitimate? And what issues then will we be facing in Wales compared to what Scotland will be facing? Because Scotland will have different powers and different laws because it will be approved, compared to what Wales will now be operating under, and therefore the frameworks issues we're going to be discussing might be under different scenarios as a consequence of that. Have you made that assessment yet?
Welsh: Hoffwn ddiolch i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol am ei ddatganiad. Mae'n ddiddorol iawn deall y sefyllfa ar gyfer yr angen hwnnw i ymyrryd, ac rwy'n cefnogi eich pwyntiau yn llwyr. Rwy'n deall yr angen i wahanu'r ffordd y mae'r sefydliad hwn wedi penderfynu mewn gwirionedd ar gydsyniad, yn seiliedig ar y cytundeb a'r gwelliannau, a Senedd yr Alban, fel y dywedodd Simon Thomas yn gwbl briodol, yn gwneud penderfyniad arall. Ond rydych yn canolbwyntio hefyd ar y goblygiadau i ddatganoli a hawliau'r Senedd hon i wneud penderfyniad ar gymwyseddau datganoledig, yr oeddech chi'n credu ein bod o fewn ein hawliau i'w wneud ar y Bil penodol hwn. A ydych chi wedi asesu beth petai'r Alban hefyd o fewn ei hawliau, a bod y Goruchaf Lys yn dyfarnu bod yr Alban yn gywir i gyflwyno'r Bil hwnnw, ac felly, yn ei gyfreithloni? A pha faterion, felly, y byddwn yn eu hwynebu yng Nghymru o'u cymharu â'r hyn y bydd yr Alban yn ei wynebu? Bydd gan yr Alban wahanol bwerau a deddfau oherwydd bydd hynny wedi ei gymeradwyo, o'i gymharu â'r hyn y bydd Cymru nawr yn gweithredu oddi tano, ac felly gallai'r materion fframweithiau y byddwn yn eu trafod fod o dan wahanol senarios o ganlyniad i hynny. A ydych wedi gwneud yr asesiad hwnnw eto?
English: Well, the Scottish Government has indicated it wants to participate fully in those common framework discussions in any event, so, in practical terms, that will be available as a mechanism to all parts. Obviously, the withdrawal Act applies to all parts of the UK, to state the obvious. As of where we are today, there is no Act in force in Scotland that cuts across that. Obviously, as we take steps to repeal the Act here in the Assembly, there will be no legislation here in Wales either. So, there will be, if you like, a level playing field across all parts of the UK. Obviously, that could change if the Scottish Bill becomes law. I think because of the nature of the cases that have been put, and the arguments that have been put in response, speculating about the exact balance of that, and how it's dealt with by the Supreme Court, isn't something that I think is particularly sensible or probably possible at this point. But we'll obviously be keeping that under review and will watch how submissions are made in the Supreme Court, and we'll be taking a view and responding in relation to that.
Welsh: Wel, mae Llywodraeth yr Alban wedi mynegi ei bod yn awyddus i gymryd rhan lawn yn y trafodaethau fframwaith cyffredin hynny beth bynnag, felly, yn ymarferol, bydd hynny ar gael fel mecanwaith ar gyfer pob rhan. Yn amlwg, bydd y Ddeddf tynnu'n ôl yn gymwys i bob rhan o'r DU, i ddweud yr hyn sy'n amlwg. Fel y mae pethau heddiw, nid oes unrhyw Ddeddf mewn grym yn yr Alban sy'n torri ar draws hynny. Yn amlwg, wrth inni gymryd camau i ddiddymu'r Ddeddf yn y fan hon yn y Cynulliad, ni fydd unrhyw ddeddfwriaeth yma yng Nghymru ychwaith. Felly, bydd, os mynnwch chi, gyfle tebyg i bawb ledled pob rhan o'r DU. Yn amlwg, gallai hynny newid pe bai'r Bil yn yr Alban yn dod yn gyfraith Rwy'n credu, oherwydd natur yr achosion sydd wedi eu rhoi, a'r dadleuon a roddwyd mewn ymateb, nad yw dyfalu ynghylch union gydbwysedd hynny, a sut yr ymdrinnir ag ef gan y Goruchaf Lys, yn rhywbeth sydd yn fy marn i yn arbennig o synhwyrol nac yn bosibl, fwy na thebyg, ar hyn o bryd. Ond yn amlwg byddwn yn adolygu hynny a byddwn yn edrych ar sut y gwneir cyflwyniadau yn y Goruchaf Lys, a byddwn yn cymryd safbwynt ac yn ymateb yn unol â hynny.
English: The next item on the agenda is the statement by the Minister for Children, Older People and Social Care on the Learning Disability: Improving Lives Programme. I call on the Minister to make his statement. Huw Irranca-Davies.
Welsh: Felly, yr eitem nesaf ar yr agenda yw'r datganiad gan y Gweinidog Plant, Pobl Hŷn a Gofal Cymdeithasol ar Anabledd Dysgu: Rhaglen Gwella Bywydau. Rwy'n galw ar y Gweinidog i wneud ei ddatganiad. Huw Irranca-Davies.
English: Thank you very much, Presiding Officer, for this opportunity to give an update to Members on the Learning Disability: Improving Lives Programme after the publication of the report last week.
Welsh: Llywydd, diolch yn fawr iawn am y cyfle hwn i roi'r newyddion diweddaraf i'r Aelodau am y rhaglen gwella bywydau ar ôl cyhoeddi'r adroddiad yr wythnos diwethaf.
English: This cross-government review of learning disability policy, services and funding stems from our commitment to improve the lives of all our citizens and to address inequalities where they exist. This work was commissioned by several of my ministerial colleagues, and we have taken an approach of looking across the whole life course, covering early years, housing, social care, health, education, employment and skills. I am delighted by how many people supported us to develop these recommendations, with the programme team speaking to over 2,000 people from across Wales. We listened to people's real lived experience, as this offered insights about where we need to focus to have the greatest impact. People told us that whilst there are pockets of good practice and strong services, too many people still have to fight for the support and adjustments to services that they need to allow them to lead an ordinary life.
Welsh: Mae'r adolygiad traws-Lywodraeth hwn o bolisi, gwasanaethau a chyllid anabledd dysgu yn deillio o'n hymrwymiad i wella bywydau ein dinasyddion ac ymdrin ag anghydraddoldebau lle bynnag y maen nhw'n bodoli. Comisiynwyd y gwaith hwn gan sawl un o'm cyd-Weinidogion, ac rydym wedi ymdrin â'r mater gan edrych ar hyd y cwrs bywyd cyfan, sy'n cwmpasu blynyddoedd cynnar, tai, gofal cymdeithasol, iechyd, addysg, cyflogaeth a sgiliau. Rwy'n falch tu hwnt o gael cymaint o bobl i'n cefnogi wrth i ni Gwrandawsom ar brofiad o fywyd gwirioneddol pobl, gan fod hynny'n rhoi cipolwg i ni o'r mannau y mae angen i ni ganolbwyntio arnyn nhw er mwyn cael yr effaith fwyaf. Dywedodd pobl wrthym, er bod ardaloedd bychan o arfer da a gwasanaethau cryf, fod gormod o bobl yn dal i orfod brwydro i gael y cymorth a'r addasiadau i'r gwasanaethau y mae arnyn nhw eu hangen i'w galluogi i fyw bywydau cyffredin.
English: Thank you. We are over half way through the statement and we've had two questions. I'll grant you from spokespeople, but if we can make some progress - . Michelle Brown.
Welsh: Diolch. Rydym dros hanner ffordd drwy'r datganiad ac rydym wedi cael dau gwestiwn. Rwy'n derbyn bod hynny gan lefarwyr, ond os gallwn wneud rhywfaint o gynnydd - . Michelle Brown.
English: Thank you, Michelle. I'm not going to cause you any anger, Dirprwy Lywydd. I'll try and be very, very quick, but there were about seven questions in that as well. Can I go to the core ones here -
Welsh: Diolch i chi, Michelle. Nid wyf am fod yn achos unrhyw ddicter i chi, Dirprwy Lywydd. Byddaf yn ceisio bod yn gyflym iawn, iawn, ond roedd yna tua saith o gwestiynau yn hwn hefyd. A gaf i droi at y rhai craidd yma -
English: You don't have to answer them all.
Welsh: Nid oes raid i chi eu hateb i gyd.
English: I welcome this report and I welcome the philosophy behind it. It does remind me of the all-Wales mental handicap strategy that was introduced here in Wales in 1983, which at its time was seen as being very visionary, and I know that is referred to in this report. I was involved in some work with that strategy. So, I wondered if you could tell us if you see a legacy in Wales of that strategy, which was acclaimed at the time. I'd like to be reassured that we're not beginning again, because that was a stress on - you know, the philosophy that was behind that, I think, is very much the same as the philosophy that's here now. So, that's one question. The other question is: I wondered if we had many or any adults with learning disabilities who are placed outside Wales and whether you are able to give an estimate of the cost of that and whether there's any chance of bringing them back to Wales. Finally, in terms of the health inequalities, I was staggered to read in one of the English reports that the overall life expectancy of people with learning disabilities lagged far behind: 23 years for men and 29 years for women, which I think is an absolutely staggering figure. I wondered whether we had any Welsh-based research that's indicated whether that was a similar figure for Wales. I think you've already answered about how you're going to tackle health inequalities, but could you comment on those figures?
Welsh: Rwy'n croesawu'r adroddiad hwn, ac yn croesawu'r meddylfryd y tu ôl iddo. Mae'n fy atgoffa i o'r strategaeth anfantais feddyliol Cymru gyfan a gyflwynwyd yma yng Nghymru yn 1983. Fe'i hystyrid ar y pryd yn un â gweledigaeth bwysig, a gwn y cyfeirir ati yn yr adroddiad hwn. Roeddwn i'n ymwneud â pheth o waith y strategaeth honno. Felly, tybed a wnewch chi ddweud wrthym a welwch chi waddol yng Nghymru o'r strategaeth honno a oedd yn cael ei chanmol ar y pryd. Hoffwn gael sicrwydd nad ydym yn dechrau eto, oherwydd roedd pwyslais yno ar - wyddoch chi, y meddylfryd y tu ôl i hynny, yn fy marn i, mae'n debyg iawn i'r meddylfryd sydd yn y fan hon nawr. Felly, dyna un cwestiwn. Y cwestiwn arall yw: tybed a oedd gennym lawer neu unrhyw oedolion ag anableddau dysgu wedi eu lleoli y tu allan i Gymru ac a allech chi roi amcangyfrif o gost hynny ac a oes unrhyw gyfle i ddod â nhw yn ôl i Gymru. Yn olaf, o ran anghydraddoldebau iechyd, cefais fy syfrdanu o ddarllen mewn un o'r adroddiadau Seisnig fod disgwyliad oes cyffredinol pobl sydd ag anableddau dysgu ymhell ar ei hôl hi: 23 blynedd i ddynion a 29 mlynedd i fenywod, a chredaf fod hwnnw'n ffigur cwbl syfrdanol. Tybed a ydym wedi cael unrhyw ymchwil yng Nghymru i ddangos bod ffigur cyffelyb i Gymru. Credaf eich bod eisoes wedi ateb sut yr ydych yn bwriadu mynd i'r afael ag anghydraddoldebau iechyd, ond a allech roi sylwadau ar y ffigurau hynny?
English: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Perhaps I can just start by saying, of course, that autism itself is not a learning disability. I think that's perhaps something we should make plain in the Chamber. Autism Spectrum Connection Cymru's one-stop shop that we've been speaking about, as far as I understand, is being forced to close because it's lost its funding. I'd be grateful if you could have a look at that, please, Minister. My one question was about the cross-Government review of learning disability policy, and I'd be grateful if you could tell us something about how you've consulted with the culture Minister, in particular. I'm thinking in particular of Hijinx Theatre company which, of course, has performers with all kinds of abilities, and perhaps you didn't realise that they'd been taken on by Cardiff Airport in order to help their staff with their communication strategy. So, it's not just a case of actors of this nature going into businesses and raising awareness, but they're actually doing good work in helping Cardiff Airport, in this case, to improve their communications. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Efallai y gallaf ddechrau drwy ddweud, wrth gwrs, nad yw awtistiaeth ynddo'i hun yn anabledd dysgu. Credaf fod hynny efallai yn rhywbeth y dylem ei wneud yn glir yn y Siambr. Mae siop un stop Autism Spectrum Connections Cymru yr ydym wedi bod yn siarad amdani, yn ôl a ddeallaf, yn cael ei gorfodi i gau oherwydd ei bod wedi colli ei chyllid. Byddwn yn ddiolchgar pe gallech edrych ar hynny, os gwelwch yn dda, Gweinidog. Yr un cwestiwn gennyf i oedd am yr adolygiad traws-Lywodraeth o bolisi anabledd dysgu, a byddwn yn ddiolchgar pe gallech ddweud rhywbeth wrthym am sut yr ydym wedi ymgynghori â'r Gweinidog diwylliant, yn benodol. Rwy'n meddwl yn arbennig am gwmni Theatr Hijinx lle ceir, wrth gwrs, berfformwyr â phob math o alluoedd, ac efallai nad oeddech yn sylweddoli eu bod wedi cymryd gwaith gan faes awyr Caerdydd i helpu eu staff gyda'u strategaeth gyfathrebu. Felly, nid dim ond mater yw hyn o actorion o'r anian hon yn mynd i mewn i fusnesau ac yn codi ymwybyddiaeth, ond maent mewn gwirionedd yn gwneud gwaith da yn helpu Maes Awyr Caerdydd, yn yr achos hwn, i wella eu cyfathrebu. Diolch.
English: Thank you very much. On the specific of Hijinx, I can't comment directly on that one, clearly, but there is an expectation that in delivering this the statutory obligation that we place on providers, but also those who have funding at their fingertips, is that they actually use it to deliver these outcomes that we are focused on. And, yes, in terms of bringing this forward, it's not only been the wide involvement with over 2,000 stakeholders, but also right across Government as well. That defines this programme, so including with the Minister for culture - the contribution is right across Government. I think that has to also characterise the taking forward of this work as well, as the recommendations are taken forward and the ministerial group comes back and says, 'This is where you now need to target your priorities, your funding outcomes and so on.' It has to be across Government.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. O ran Hijinx yn benodol, ni allaf wneud sylw uniongyrchol ynglŷn â hynny, yn amlwg, ond mae disgwyliad wrth gyflawni hyn, y rhwymedigaeth statudol a roddwn ar ddarparwyr, ond hefyd y rhai sydd ag arian ar gael yn rhwydd iddyn nhw, yw eu bod mewn gwirionedd yn ei ddefnyddio i gyflawni'r canlyniadau hyn yr ydym ni'n canolbwyntio arnynt. Ac, ie, o ran datblygu hyn, mae wedi ymwneud nid yn unig â chyfranogiad eang mwy na 2000 o randdeiliaid, ond hefyd â'r Llywodraeth yn ei chyfanrwydd hefyd. Mae hynny'n diffinio'r rhaglen hon, gan gynnwys felly y Gweinidog Diwylliant - ceir cyfraniad o bob rhan o'r Llywodraeth. Rwy'n credu bod yn rhaid i hynny nodweddu datblygiad y gwaith hwn hefyd, wrth gyflwyno'r argymhellion ac i'r grŵp gweinidogol ymateb a dweud, 'Dyma lle bellach y mae angen ichi dargedu eich blaenoriaethau, eich canlyniadau cyllid ac ati.' Mae'n rhaid i'r Llywodraeth gyfan fod yn rhan ohono.
English: Item 6 is a debate on Brexit and the fishing industry, and I call on the Cabinet Secretary for Energy, Planning and Rural Affairs, Lesley Griffiths.
Welsh: Eitem 6 yw dadl ar Brexit a'r diwydiant pysgota, a galwaf ar Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Ynni, Cynllunio a Materion Gwledig, Lesley Griffiths.
English: Thank you for giving way. Just on the general picture that she just portrayed, she's talked about the shellfish industry, which, of course, is not dependent on quotas, and earlier she talked about quotas and the potential for releasing new stock, which we'd assume would be done on a sustainable basis, and she said that such quotas should be for the public good. Does that mean that she envisages Welsh fishing policy going forward to be based on quotas based on environmental sustainability principles but not based on buying and selling?
Welsh: Diolch i chi am ildio. Dim ond o ran y darlun cyffredinol y mae hi newydd ei bortreadu, mae hi wedi sôn am y diwydiant pysgod cregyn, nad yw, wrth gwrs, yn dibynnu ar gwotâu, ac yn gynharach soniodd am gwotâu a'r posibilrwydd o ryddhau stoc newydd, a byddem yn tybio y gwneid hynny yn gynaliadwy, a dywedodd y byddai cwotâu o'r fath er budd y cyhoedd. A yw hynny'n golygu ei bod yn rhagweld polisi pysgota Cymru yn datblygu i fod yn seiliedig ar gwotâu wedi eu seilio ar egwyddorion cynaliadwyedd amgylcheddol, ond nid yn seiliedig ar brynu a gwerthu?
English: I have selected the six amendments to the motion. If amendment 2 is agreed, amendment 3 will be deselected. I call on Neil Hamilton to move amendments 1 and 3, tabled in the name of Caroline Jones. Neil Hamilton.
Welsh: Rwyf wedi dethol y chwe gwelliant i'r cynnig. Os derbynnir gwelliant 2, caiff gwelliant 3 ei ddad-ddethol. Galwaf ar Neil Hamilton i gynnig gwelliannau 1 a 3, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Caroline Jones. Neil Hamilton.
English: Do you not accept, though, that with the agricultural produce and with the fish produce that we have within Wales, if we don't have absolutely unrestricted access to the European market where most of it goes, most of it will become adulterated, that market will actually be lost and the only people who will benefit will probably be the Welsh population who'll be forced to eat lobster every week?
Welsh: Onid ydych chi'n derbyn, fodd bynnag, gyda'r cynnyrch amaethyddol a'r pysgod sydd gennym ni yng Nghymru, os na chawn ni fynediad hollol digyfyngiad i'r farchnad Ewropeaidd lle mae'r rhan fwyaf o'r cynnyrch hwnnw'n mynd, bydd y rhan fwyaf ohono yn difetha, caiff y farchnad honno ei cholli mewn gwirionedd, ac mae'n debyg mai'r unig bobl a fydd yn elwa fydd poblogaeth Cymru fwy na thebyg fydd yn cael eu gorfodi i fwyta cimwch bob wythnos?
English: Well, Pembrokeshire lobster is extremely palatable, I can tell you. But, yes, I realise that the industry is very dependent upon exports, but there's a massive opportunity for us here, because we have a massive imbalance in our trade in foodstuffs with the EU and if tariffs are idiotically imposed by the EU - not because the British Government won't be interested in doing so - then, we have huge opportunities for import substitution and changing, perhaps, the tastes of the British public to take advantage of the opportunities that will arrive. Sadly, I haven't time to go into all the complicated arguments of trade imbalances, which I'm sure there'll be other opportunities to go into, but it is important to recognise that this gives us huge opportunities, also, to remedy the environmental disaster that has befallen the British fishing industry over the last 40 years, and I welcome the intention of the Welsh Government to play its full part in that process.
Welsh: Wel, mae cimychiaid sir Benfro yn hynod o flasus, gallaf ddweud hynny wrthych chi. Ond, ydw, rwy'n sylweddoli bod y diwydiant yn ddibynnol iawn ar allforio, ond mae cyfle enfawr i ni yn y fan yma, oherwydd mae gennym ni anghydbwysedd enfawr yn y bwydydd yr ydym ni'n eu masnachu gyda'r UE ac os caiff tariffau eu gosod yn ffôl gan yr UE - nid oherwydd na fydd diddordeb gan Lywodraeth Prydain mewn gwneud hynny - yna, mae gennym ni gyfleoedd enfawr o ran ailystyried yr hyn a gaiff ei fewnforio a newid, efallai, chwaeth y cyhoedd ym Mhrydain i fanteisio ar y cyfleoedd a ddaw i'n rhan. Yn anffodus, does gen i ddim amser i fanylu ar y dadleuon cymhleth o anghydbwysedd masnach, ac rwy'n siŵr y bydd cyfleoedd eraill i'w gwyntyllu, ond mae hi yn bwysig cydnabod bod hyn yn rhoi cyfleoedd enfawr inni, hefyd, i wneud iawn am y drychineb amgylcheddol sydd wedi taro'r diwydiant pysgota Prydeinig dros y 40 mlynedd diwethaf, ac rwy'n croesawu bwriad Llywodraeth Cymru i chwarae ei rhan lawn yn y broses honno.
English: I call on David Melding to move amendment 2, tabled in the name of Paul Davies. David Melding.
Welsh: Galwaf ar David Melding i gynnig gwelliant 2, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Paul Davies. David Melding.
English: I just want to very much endorse the comments you've just made. I visited the school of oceanic sciences in Bangor last year. They spoke to me about the Prince Madog. Of course, it is in dual ownership, and I raised it with the Welsh Government. They represented that as a reason not to intervene, rather than a mechanism they need to follow to ensure this ship continues, but I fully endorse you: this ship must continue its great work.
Welsh: Hoffwn yn fawr iawn ategu'r sylwadau yr ydych chi newydd eu gwneud. Ymwelais â'r ysgol gwyddorau eigion ym Mangor y llynedd. Fe wnaethon nhw siarad â mi am eu cwch, y Tywysog Madog. Wrth gwrs, mae mewn perchenogaeth ddeuol, ac fe grybwyllais hyn wrth Lywodraeth Cymru. Dywedasant fod hynny'n rheswm i beidio ag ymyrryd, yn hytrach na mecanwaith y mae angen iddynt ei ddilyn i sicrhau bod y llong hon yn parhau i hwylio, ond rwy'n eich cefnogi'n llwyr: mae'n rhaid i'r llong hon barhau â'i gwaith gwych.