English: [ Inaudible.] - lawyer sometimes. Well, first of all, I don't like the tone of the motion. I think that if we all discussed - . I know you had a cosy discussion with Plaid Cymru about how the motion would be phrased and you're very happy with that, but I think that there was a wider agreement that could have been sought on that motion, actually, and I think we could have had a better tone. I've already said to the Minister that I think that whilst there are details of the shared prosperity fund that are still up in the air, some of them understandably so, then it is unfair to simply dismiss the whole fund at this point in time. I accept further down the line you may want to say it's not to be accepted and you can get rid of it, but at this point in time I don't think that point 3 should be there. In fact, we do accept point 4, which follows on from point 3 - probably an obvious thing to point out to you - but point 4 does say that there is a need for equity. It does say - . I can see that Mick Antoniw is now reading that point 4. And you'll see that the points made in point 4 I think make the points of point 3 in a far more effective way and with a better tone, and that's why we voted to remove point 3. [ Interruption.] Can I just make a little bit of progress? Then I'll let you in. We're all agreed on the need for a fair settlement for the nations and regions of the entirety of the UK, addressing inequalities and underinvestment across the country. We also agree that the new arrangements need to respect devolution and ensure that Wales retains the autonomy to devolve and deliver successful arrangements for successor funds - the point that's made in point 4. I give way.
Welsh: [ Anghlywadwy.] - cyfreithiwr weithiau. Wel, yn gyntaf, dydw i ddim yn hoffi tôn y cynnig. Credaf, pe byddem ni i gyd yn trafod - . Gwn eich bod wedi cael trafodaeth glos gyda Phlaid Cymru ynghylch sut y byddai'r cynnig yn cael ei eirio a'ch bod chi'n fodlon iawn ar hynny, ond credaf y byddai wedi bod yn bosibl ceisio cael cytundeb ehangach ar y cynnig hwnnw, a dweud y gwir, a chredaf y gallem ni fod wedi cael gwell tôn. Rwyf i eisoes wedi dweud wrth y Gweinidog fy mod i'n credu, er bod rhai manylion am y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin yn dal yn ansicr, rhai ohonyn nhw yn ddealladwy felly, ei bod hi'n annheg felly i ddiystyru'r gronfa gyfan ar hyn o bryd. Rwyf yn derbyn yn nes ymlaen efallai y byddwch eisiau dweud na ddylid ei derbyn ac y gallwch chi gael gwared arni, ond ar hyn o bryd nid wyf yn credu y dylai pwynt 3 fod yna. Mewn gwirionedd, rydym ni yn derbyn pwynt 4, sy'n dilyn o bwynt 3 - rhywbeth amlwg i ddweud wrthych chi mae'n debyg, - ond mae pwynt 4 yn dweud bod angen tegwch. Mae'n dweud - . Gallaf weld bod Mick Antoniw nawr yn darllen y pwynt 4 hwnnw. A byddwch yn gweld bod y pwyntiau sy'n cael eu gwneud ym mhwynt 4 yn fy marn i yn gwneud pwyntiau pwynt 3 mewn ffordd llawer mwy effeithiol a gyda gwell tôn, a dyna pam y gwnaethom ni bleidleisio i ddileu pwynt 3. [ Torri ar draws.] A gaf i wneud dim ond ychydig bach o gynnydd? Yna, fe wnaf i eich gadael chi i mewn. Rydym ni i gyd yn cytuno bod angen setliad teg i genhedloedd a rhanbarthau'r DU gyfan, gan fynd i'r afael ag anghydraddoldeb a thanfuddsoddi ar hyd a lled y wlad. Rydym ni hefyd yn cytuno bod angen i'r trefniadau newydd barchu datganoli a sicrhau bod Cymru yn cadw'r ymreolaeth i ddatganoli a chyflawni trefniadau llwyddiannus ar gyfer cronfeydd olynol - y pwynt a wneir ym mhwynt 4. Ildiaf.