techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I'm extremely grateful to the Cabinet Secretary for his honesty on the dire situation at the moment. A number of constituents have been in contact with me to convey their concerns about the waiting list, which represents hundreds of people awaiting treatment. Some patients had to wait eight months before receiving a hearing aid. Has the Government carried out any assessment of the cause of these lengthy waiting times, and what measures can be put in place in order to ensure that there is improvement? Has the Government given any consideration - in addition to the target that they have set of 14 weeks for a first-time hearing aid - to setting a specific target for replacements, where there is a dire problem at the moment in terms of the waiting times?
Welsh: Rwy'n ddiolchgar iawn i'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet am ei onestrwydd ynglŷn â'r sefyllfa druenus, a dweud y gwir, ar hyn o bryd. Mae sawl etholwr wedi cysylltu â mi i gyfleu eu pryder am y rhestr aros, sydd yn cynrychioli cannoedd o bobl sy'n aros am driniaeth. Mae rhai cleifion, wrth gwrs, yn gorfod aros wyth mis cyn derbyn teclyn clywed ar hyn o bryd. A yw'r Llywodraeth wedi gwneud asesiad o achos yr amseroedd aros hir hyn a pha fesurau y gellir eu rhoi yn eu lle er mwyn sicrhau bod yna welliant? A ydy'r Llywodraeth hefyd wedi ystyried - yn ogystal â'r targed maen nhw wedi'i osod o 14 wythnos ar gyfer teclyn clywed am y tro cyntaf - gosod targed penodol ar gyfer ailosodiadau, lle mae yna broblem dybryd ar hyn o bryd o ran y rhestrau aros?
English: Cabinet Secretary, you've just referred to the national ENT implementation plan, which was published earlier this year, and that plan announced that each health board would actually establish an ENT care collaborative group, to oversee issues such as appropriate patient streams and referral thresholds, which would help with reducing waiting times. In light of that plan, can you provide an update on the progress of the Hywel Dda ENT care collaborative group, and tell us what new outcomes have been delivered by the health board in the way it delivers ENT services for patients in west Wales, and can you tell us how this is helping to reduce waiting times?
Welsh: Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, rydych newydd gyfeirio at y cynllun gweithredu clust, trwyn a gwddf cenedlaethol, a gyhoeddwyd yn gynharach eleni, ac roedd y cynllun hwnnw'n cyhoeddi y buasai pob bwrdd iechyd yn sefydlu grŵp cydweithredol ar ofal clust, trwyn a gwddf, i oruchwylio materion megis llif cleifion priodol a throthwyon atgyfeirio, a fuasai'n helpu i leihau amseroedd aros. Yng ngoleuni'r cynllun hwnnw, a allwch roi'r wybodaeth ddiweddaraf i ni am gynnydd grŵp cydweithredol Hywel Dda ar ofal clust, trwyn a gwddf, a dweud wrthym pa ganlyniadau newydd a gyflawnwyd gan y bwrdd iechyd yn y modd y mae'n darparu gwasanaethau clust, trwyn a gwddf i gleifion yng ngorllewin Cymru, ac a allwch ddweud wrthym sut y mae hyn yn helpu i leihau amseroedd aros?
English: As I've explained in the first series of answers, it's actually about the fact that Hywel Dda aren't where they need to be. Some of it is about short-term measures and some of it is about the longer-term planning and the engagement with stakeholders to make sure that they do have a local plan. They should also benefit from some of the national pilot work being undertaken in other health board areas, both in terms of the point about staff mix, but also about how the pathway is designed. So, I can't say to you, or any Member - and I wouldn't try to - that I expect all these issues to be resolved within a period of a few weeks. But I do expect that, before the end of this performance year, and going into the next one, that there'll be a model of care that is more sustainable, where stakeholders themselves will have been involved in designing that, and in designing the measures to understand what success looks like, and I do then expect Hywel Dda to have a more sustainable delivery mechanism for citizens within west Wales. That should also then transfer into learning across the rest of the country too.
Welsh: Fel yr eglurais yn y gyfres gyntaf o atebion, mae'n ymwneud mewn gwirionedd â'r ffaith nad yw Hywel Dda lle y mae angen iddynt fod. Mae rhywfaint ohono'n ymwneud â mesurau tymor byr ac mae rhywfaint ohono'n ymwneud â chynllunio tymor hwy ac ymgysylltu â rhanddeiliaid i sicrhau bod ganddynt gynllun lleol. Dylent hefyd elwa o rywfaint o'r gwaith peilot cenedlaethol sy'n cael ei wneud yn ardaloedd byrddau iechyd eraill, o ran y pwynt ynglŷn â chymysgedd staff, ond hefyd ynglŷn â'r ffordd y mae'r llwybr wedi'i gynllunio. Felly, ni allaf ddweud wrthych chi, nac wrth unrhyw Aelod - ac ni fuaswn yn ceisio gwneud hynny - fy mod yn disgwyl y bydd yr holl faterion hyn yn cael eu datrys o fewn cyfnod o ychydig o wythnosau. Ond cyn diwedd y flwyddyn berfformio hon, ac wrth symud i'r nesaf, rwy'n disgwyl y bydd yna fodel gofalu sy'n fwy cynaliadwy, a bydd rhanddeiliaid eu hunain wedi chwarae rhan yn y broses o'i lunio, a llunio'r mesurau i ddeall beth sy'n dynodi llwyddiant, ac rwy'n disgwyl wedyn y bydd gan Hywel Dda fecanwaith darparu mwy cynaliadwy ar gyfer dinasyddion yng ngorllewin Cymru. Dylai hynny hefyd drosglwyddo i ddysgu yng ngweddill y wlad.
English: We discussed aspects of the paediatric service in last week's urgent question. I reiterate again that I expect service provision to be delivered on the basis of the very best available clinical evidence. And, of course, the Member is familiar with the content of the 2015 review, led by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Welsh: Buom yn trafod agweddau ar y gwasanaeth pediatrig yn ystod y cwestiwn brys yr wythnos diwethaf. Ategaf eto fy mod yn disgwyl y bydd y gwasanaeth yn cael ei ddarparu ar sail y dystiolaeth glinigol orau sydd ar gael. Ac wrth gwrs, mae'r Aelod yn gyfarwydd â chynnwys adolygiad 2015, dan arweiniad y Coleg Brenhinol Pediatreg ac Iechyd Plant.
English: Cabinet Secretary, as has already been said in this Chamber before, the Royal College of Emergency Medicine have made it clear that a 24-hour paediatric service is needed in order to maintain a full-time accident and emergency service. Given that you continue to tell us that the Welsh Government is listening to experts, can you tell us whether you agree with the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, who are experts, that 24-hour paediatric services are needed to maintain an accident and emergency service? And, if so, will you now look to re-establish full-time paediatric services at Withybush hospital?
Welsh: Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, fel sydd wedi cael ei ddweud yn y Siambr hon o'r blaen, mae'r Coleg Brenhinol Meddygaeth Frys wedi dweud yn glir fod angen gwasanaeth pediatrig 24 awr er mwyn cynnal gwasanaeth damweiniau ac achosion brys amser llawn. O ystyried eich bod yn parhau i ddweud wrthym fod Llywodraeth Cymru yn gwrando ar arbenigwyr, a allwch ddweud wrthym a ydych yn cytuno gyda'r Coleg Brenhinol Meddygaeth Frys, sy'n arbenigwyr, fod angen gwasanaethau pediatrig 24 awr i gynnal gwasanaeth damweiniau ac achosion brys? Ac os felly, a wnewch chi ystyried ailsefydlu gwasanaethau pediatrig amser llawn yn ysbyty Llwynhelyg yn awr?
English: Well, there's an interesting conflation of two separate issues there. In terms of the paediatric service, we know that, in other parts of the UK, the paediatric service is provided by nurses, leading the paediatric service. In fact, the 2015 royal college review indicated that it may be more sensible to move to a nurse-led service around Withybush in any event. That review also told us very clearly that it would not be sensible to try and reinstate a 24-hour paediatric ambulatory care service. There is a challenge in making sure all these different services match up with each other. A practical thing like moving where the paediatric unit is, so it's nearer the emergency unit, it's part of what has already been done. But I do reiterate that the advice that we have had about the model of care being provided in west Wales is one that has serious weight to it, of genuine expertise, where people are responsible for managing, leading and delivering these services around the country, and we'll continue to be guided by the evidence and advice.
Welsh: Wel, mae yna gyfuniad diddorol o ddau fater ar wahân yno. O ran y gwasanaeth pediatrig, rydym yn gwybod bod y gwasanaeth pediatrig, mewn rhannau eraill o'r DU, yn cael ei ddarparu gan nyrsys sy'n arwain y gwasanaeth pediatrig. Yn wir, nododd adolygiad y coleg brenhinol yn 2015 y gallai fod yn fwy synhwyrol i symud at wasanaeth sy'n cael ei arwain gan nyrsys yn Llwynhelyg beth bynnag. Dywedodd yr adolygiad hwnnw wrthym yn glir iawn hefyd na fuasai'n synhwyrol i geisio adfer gwasanaeth triniaethau dydd pediatrig 24 awr. Mae yna her o ran sicrhau bod yr holl wasanaethau gwahanol hyn yn cyd-fynd â'i gilydd. Mae gwneud rhywbeth ymarferol fel symud yr uned bediatrig, fel ei bod yn nes at yr uned achosion brys, yn rhan o'r hyn sydd eisoes wedi cael ei wneud. Ond rwy'n ailadrodd bod y cyngor a gawsom am y model gofal a ddarperir yng ngorllewin Cymru yn un sy'n meddu ar sylwedd gwirioneddol ac arbenigedd go iawn, lle mae pobl yn gyfrifol am reoli, arwain a darparu'r gwasanaethau hyn o amgylch y wlad, a byddwn yn parhau i gael ein harwain gan y dystiolaeth a'r cyngor.
English: Cabinet Secretary, it is, of course, right that these questions are raised here in the Assembly, and I'm sure that you agree that questions are raised and asked in the Assembly. But I'm a bit concerned about the tone of the question that you had previously, and how that will play out in Pembrokeshire, where I live. I don't want the message from here to become one of alarm, that, suddenly, Withybush accident and emergency is now at risk, and that is my concern from the previous question. So, what I'm asking of you, Cabinet Secretary, is a clear message that that is not the case, and that the two things that you've just said were conflated - paediatric care and A&E services - are separate and that one doesn't actually depend on the other.
Welsh: Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, mae'n iawn, wrth gwrs, fod y cwestiynau hyn yn cael eu gofyn yma yn y Cynulliad, ac rwy'n siŵr y byddwch yn cytuno bod cwestiynau'n cael eu codi a'u gofyn yn y Cynulliad. Ond rwyf ychydig yn bryderus am dôn y cwestiwn a gawsoch yn flaenorol, a beth fydd yr ymateb iddo yn Sir Benfro, lle rwy'n byw. Nid wyf am i'r neges o'r fan hon fod yn un sy'n peri ofn yn sydyn fod adran ddamweiniau ac achosion brys ysbyty Llwynhelyg mewn perygl yn awr, a dyna yw fy mhryder o'r cwestiwn blaenorol. Felly, yr hyn rwyf ei eisiau gennych, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, yw neges glir sy'n rhoi sicrwydd nad yw hynny'n wir, a bod y ddau beth y dywedoch eu bod wedi'u cyfuno - gofal pediatrig a gwasanaethau damweiniau ac achosion brys - ar wahân ac nad yw un yn dibynnu ar y llall mewn gwirionedd.
English: Thank you for the question, Joyce Watson. I recognise that there is real concern about the future of health in almost every part of the country. Given the commentary about healthcare services in west Wales and the extremity of the language, it is no wonder that people are concerned. I repeat again: the challenge of having a paediatric service is part of what we are being guided by, and its relationship with the A&E service as well. There are no plans to change the A&E service. We are working with the health board, and it's the health board's responsibility to work with its stakeholders, to listen to its clinicians and the public, to meet the desire for a service, but to actually meet the need to deliver that service in a genuinely safe manner that delivers the high-quality care that I expect for every citizen right across Wales. So, I reiterate again that, on the paediatric service, we are listening to the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. They have undertaken another review again, at the end of September, to further inform where we are. I do not believe there is any need to scaremonger or to project fear about the future of A&E services in Withybush or further within west Wales.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiwn, Joyce Watson. Rwy'n cydnabod bod pryder gwirioneddol ynglŷn â dyfodol iechyd ym mron pob rhan o'r wlad. O ystyried y sylwadau am wasanaethau gofal iechyd yng ngorllewin Cymru ac eithafiaeth yr iaith, nid yw'n syndod fod pobl yn poeni. Ailadroddaf eto: mae'r her o gael gwasanaeth pediatrig yn rhan o'r hyn sy'n ein harwain, a'i berthynas gyda'r gwasanaeth damweiniau ac achosion brys hefyd. Nid oes unrhyw gynlluniau i newid y gwasanaeth damweiniau ac achosion brys. Rydym yn gweithio gyda'r bwrdd iechyd, a chyfrifoldeb y bwrdd iechyd yw gweithio gyda'i randdeiliaid, gwrando ar ei glinigwyr a'r cyhoedd, bodloni'r dyhead am wasanaeth, ond i fynd ati mewn gwirionedd i ateb yr angen i ddarparu'r gwasanaeth hwnnw mewn modd gwirioneddol ddiogel sy'n darparu'r gofal o ansawdd uchel rwy'n ei ddisgwyl i bob dinesydd ledled Cymru. Felly, rwy'n ailadrodd eto mewn perthynas â'r gwasanaeth pediatrig, ein bod yn gwrando ar y Coleg Brenhinol Pediatreg ac Iechyd Plant. Maent wedi cynnal adolygiad arall eto, ar ddiwedd mis Medi, er mwyn taflu goleuni pellach ar lle rydym. Nid wyf yn credu bod angen codi bwganod neu godi ofn ar bobl mewn perthynas â dyfodol gwasanaethau damweiniau ac achosion brys yn Ysbyty Llwynhelyg nac yng ngorllewin Cymru yn gyffredinol.
English: Cabinet Secretary, if Withybush was in your constituency, would the constant reliance on locum paediatric consultants meet your demands and expectations of high-quality care?
Welsh: Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, pe bai Llwynhelyg yn eich etholaeth chi, a fuasai'r ddibyniaeth gyson ar ymgynghorwyr pediatrig locwm yn ateb eich gofynion a'ch disgwyliadau am ofal o ansawdd uchel?
English: It's part of the challenge that we have about ensuring that we have a consistent grade - [Interruption.] You're getting an honest answer. [Continues.] - that we have a consistent grade of a medical workforce, and those other professionals who support them, to make sure that we do deliver high-quality care. That does mean that we need to move to a model that will allow us to recruit permanent high-quality staff across all those particular grades. As to the consultant cover is being provided, if you look again at the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health's review, they indicate it's for an integrated team, based at Glangwili, to provide that cover, but it does not mean that there is no paediatric service within Withybush; it's one that meets demand and meets need. And if I lived in and around the Withybush area, I would want to know that the service that is being provided is one that is based on the very best clinical evidence and advice. And that is a challenge. Trying to run a service that meets the needs of local politicians and ignores the requirements of evidence and reliable clinical advice is the wrong thing to do for citizens, either in Withybush or in any other part of the country.
Welsh: Mae'n rhan o'r her rydym yn ei hwynebu ynglŷn â sicrhau bod gennym gyfradd gyson - [Torri ar draws.] Rwy'n rhoi ateb gonest i chi. [Yn parhau.] - fod gennym gyfradd gyson o weithlu meddygol, a'r gweithwyr proffesiynol eraill sy'n eu cefnogi, er mwyn sicrhau ein bod yn darparu gofal o ansawdd uchel. Mae hynny'n golygu bod angen i ni symud at fodel a fydd yn ein galluogi i recriwtio staff parhaol o ansawdd uchel ar draws pob un o'r graddfeydd penodol hynny. O ran y gwasanaeth ymgynghorol sy'n cael ei ddarparu, os edrychwch eto ar adolygiad y Coleg Brenhinol Pediatreg ac Iechyd Plant, maent yn nodi mai tîm integredig, wedi'i leoli yn Ysbyty Glangwili, sy'n cyflenwi'r gwasanaeth ymgynghorol hwnnw, ond nid yw'n golygu nad oes gwasanaeth pediatrig yn Llwynhelyg; mae'n un sy'n ateb y galw ac yn diwallu anghenion. A phe bawn yn byw yn ardal Llwynhelyg neu'r cylch, buaswn eisiau gwybod bod y gwasanaeth sy'n cael ei ddarparu yn un sy'n seiliedig ar y dystiolaeth a'r cyngor clinigol gorau posibl. Ac mae hynny'n her. Ceisio cynnal gwasanaeth sy'n diwallu anghenion gwleidyddion lleol ac sy'n anwybyddu'r angen am dystiolaeth a chyngor clinigol dibynadwy fuasai'r peth anghywir i'w wneud i ddinasyddion, naill ai yn Llwynhelyg, neu unrhyw ran arall o'r wlad.
English: Questions now from party spokesperson. Welsh Conservative spokesperson, Suzy Davies.
Welsh: Cwestiynau nawr gan lefarwyr y pleidiau. Llefarydd y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig, Suzy Davies.
English: Diolch, Lywydd. Good afternoon, Minister. The draft budget shows a £3.6 million cut to direct social services funding. Where is that money going and, if it is still for social services purposes, how will I be able to find it in order to scrutinise how it's spent?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Prynhawn da, Weinidog. Mae'r gyllideb ddrafft yn dangos toriad o £3.6 miliwn i gyllid gwasanaethau cymdeithasol uniongyrchol. I ble mae'r arian hwnnw'n mynd, ac os yw'n dal i fod at ddibenion gwasanaethau cymdeithasol, sut y gallaf ddod o hyd iddo er mwyn craffu ar sut y mae'n cael ei wario?
English: The draft budget shows an extra £25 million for social services, and that was in respect and in understanding of the severe pressures that the social services sector are under at the moment. Pressures include, for example, the national living wage coming in next year, which will impact on local authorities and providers themselves. But it's very important to respect the fact that it's great news that low-paid workers will receive an increase in pay, but also to understand that it's going to put some pressure on the sector, which is why we've allocated an extra £25 million for that. We also allocated more than £4 million extra in order to be able to take the first step in achieving our manifesto commitment of doubling the capital limit that people can keep before paying for care. So, we've allocated more than £4 million for that, and, also, money to enable us to put in place the full disregard of the war disablement pension from April of next year.
Welsh: Mae'r gyllideb ddrafft yn dangos £25 miliwn yn ychwanegol ar gyfer gwasanaethau cymdeithasol, a hynny er mwyn parchu a deall y pwysau difrifol sydd ar y sector gwasanaethau cymdeithasol ar hyn o bryd. Mae'r pwysau'n cynnwys, er enghraifft, y cyflog byw cenedlaethol a ddaw i rym y flwyddyn nesaf, ac a fydd yn effeithio ar awdurdodau lleol a'r darparwyr eu hunain. Ond mae'n bwysig iawn ein bod yn parchu'r ffaith ei fod yn newyddion gwych y bydd gweithwyr ar gyflog isel yn cael codiad cyflog, a deall hefyd y bydd hynny'n rhoi rhywfaint o bwysau ar y sector, a dyna pam rydym wedi dyrannu £25 miliwn ychwanegol ar gyfer hynny. Rydym hefyd wedi dyrannu mwy na £4 miliwn yn ychwanegol er mwyn gallu cymryd y cam cyntaf tuag at gyflawni ymrwymiad yn ein maniffesto i ddyblu'r terfyn cyfalaf y gall pobl ei gadw cyn gorfod talu am ofal. Felly, rydym wedi dyrannu mwy na £4 miliwn ar gyfer hynny, yn ogystal ag arian i'n galluogi i ddiystyru'r pensiwn anabledd rhyfel yn llawn o fis Ebrill y flwyddyn nesaf ymlaen.
English: Thank you for that answer. Obviously, we would support the final point that you made regarding the pension. But, effectively, what I've heard there is that I'm then to look for this money in wages. Perhaps you can tell me then - . You issued a statement last week, indicating that the recurrent transfer of £27 million a year from the UK Government to meet the cost of providing support to the former independent living fund recipients, is now going straight to councils, as it is in England, rather than to the independent disability sector preferred third party, as in Scotland and Northern Ireland. The purposes of that money is not to sub councils' cuts. Why have you turned your back on the more co-productive models encouraged by the future generations Act, and what guarantees have you secured that this money will be ring-fenced for its initial purpose?
Welsh: Diolch i chi am yr ateb hwnnw. Yn amlwg, byddem yn cefnogi'r pwynt olaf a wnaethoch ynglŷn â'r pensiwn. Ond i bob pwrpas, yr hyn a glywais yn y fan honno oedd fy mod i chwilio am yr arian hwn mewn cyflogau. Efallai y gallwch ddweud wrthyf felly - . Fe gyhoeddoch ddatganiad yr wythnos diwethaf sy'n dangos bod y trosglwyddiad rheolaidd o £27 miliwn y flwyddyn gan Lywodraeth y DU tuag at y gost o ddarparu cefnogaeth i'r rhai a oedd yn arfer derbyn o'r gronfa byw'n annibynnol, yn awr yn mynd yn syth i gynghorau fel y mae yn Lloegr, yn hytrach nag i drydydd parti dewisol y sector anabledd annibynnol, fel yn yr Alban a Gogledd Iwerddon. Nid diben yr arian hwnnw yw talu am doriadau cynghorau. Pam rydych chi wedi troi eich cefn ar y modelau mwy cydgynhyrchiol y mae Deddf cenedlaethau'r dyfodol yn eu hannog, a pha warantau rydych chi wedi'u sicrhau y bydd yr arian hwn yn cael ei neilltuo ar gyfer ei bwrpas gwreiddiol?
English: I don't recognise the picture that you're paining in terms of the support that we are giving to sustainable social services, to our third sector grant scheme, which is where the funding to which you refer, which was formally in the family fund, has been brought into. We have that fund, which is worth £22 million, which brings together four previous grant schemes, and we had 84 applications for grants, seeking just over £69 million for that scheme. So, we did try to look at a fair allocation of funding right across that, and the most that any organisation could have in a grant was £1.5 million. So, the family fund received the full £1.5 million in that. With regard to the future of the family fund, we've actually provided them with £400,000 in order to try and become more sustainable in the future. So, that is one of the ways in which we're supporting disabled families, and Disability Wales and Carers Wales were also awarded funding within the social services third sector grant scheme as well. On the independent living fund, we've tried to take a pragmatic approach in terms of speaking with the sector, with social services and also people in receipt of independent living moneys, in order to try to take a step approach in terms of future delivery, by taking the changes over two years. This was the approach that was suggested to us by our advisory group.
Welsh: Nid wyf yn adnabod y darlun rydych yn ei baentio o ran y gefnogaeth rydym yn ei rhoi i wasanaethau cymdeithasol cynaliadwy, i'n cynllun grant trydydd sector, sef lle y mae'r arian y cyfeiriwch ato, a oedd yn flaenorol yng nghronfa'r teulu, wedi ei roi. Mae gennym y gronfa honno, sy'n werth £22 miliwn, sy'n dod â phedwar cynllun grant blaenorol at ei gilydd, ac roedd gennym 84 o geisiadau am grantiau, yn gofyn am ychydig dros £69 miliwn ar gyfer y cynllun hwnnw. Felly, fe wnaethom geisio edrych ar ddyranu'r cyllid yn deg ar draws hynny i gyd, a'r grant mwyaf y gallai unrhyw sefydliad ei gael oedd £1.5 miliwn. Felly, derbyniodd cronfa'r teulu y £1.5 miliwn llawn yn hynny. Gyda golwg ar ddyfodol cronfa'r teulu, mewn gwirionedd rydym wedi rhoi £400,000 iddynt er mwyn ceisio dod yn fwy cynaliadwy yn y dyfodol. Felly, dyna un o'r ffyrdd rydym yn cefnogi teuluoedd anabl, a dyfarnwyd cyllid i Anabledd Cymru a Gofalwyr Cymru hefyd o fewn cynllun grant y trydydd sector y gwasanaethau cymdeithasol hefyd. O ran y gronfa byw'n annibynnol, rydym wedi ceisio mabwysiadu ymagwedd bragmatig o ran siarad â'r sector, gyda gwasanaethau cymdeithasol a hefyd â phobl sy'n cael arian byw'n annibynnol, er mwyn ceisio mabwysiadu dull fesul cam o ran darparu yn y dyfodol, drwy gymryd y newidiadau dros gyfnod o ddwy flynedd. Dyma'r dull a awgrymwyd i ni gan ein grŵp ymgynghorol.