English: Yes, that is a matter of negotiation between ourselves and British Telecom - Openreach being their contractor, of course, so it's important not to confuse the two as the split occurs. The way that the first scheme worked, to explain to Members - . I actually met with Rhun ap Iorwerth in his constituency, as well, quite a while ago now, actually, wasn't it - it was a few years ago - to talk about some of the issues there. Because of the way that the premises target in the contract worked, and because of how vigorous it was, Openreach built out to a large number more premises than they needed to be sure to hit that figure, because it was a very stringent target in the contract. That has meant that they have got a lot of infrastructure into the ground. No public money has been paid for any infrastructure that didn't get to completion. So, we have had a long conversation with them around the commercials for that - about who should pay for that. They've invested that money already. Should the public purse pay for the last bit? Why don't they just do it themselves? There's a conversation to be had, and that conversation is running in parallel with the procurement. We'll see what the outcome of those procurements will be. So, should BT be one of the people who are bidding for the procurement, no doubt they will make some proposals in that. As I said to Janet Finch-Saunders recently, we're asking for specific promises - specific plans for specific premises. So, I'd be very surprised if those weren't included, but we are live in the procurement at the moment, so I haven't got any information about what they're currently proposing.
Welsh: Ie, mae hwnnw'n fater i ni ei negodi â British Telecom - Openreach yw eu contractwr, wrth gwrs, felly mae'n bwysig peidio â drysu rhwng y ddau wrth i'r rhaniad ddigwydd. Y ffordd y gweithiodd y cynllun cyntaf, i egluro i'r Aelodau - . Mewn gwirionedd, cyfarfûm â Rhun ap Iorwerth yn ei etholaeth hefyd, gryn amser yn ôl erbyn hyn, onid oedd - roedd ychydig flynyddoedd yn ôl - i siarad am rai o'r problemau yno. Oherwydd y ffordd roedd y targed safleoedd yn y contract yn gweithio, ac am ei fod mor rymus, cysylltodd Openreach nifer fawr yn fwy o safleoedd nag oedd angen iddynt er mwyn sicrhau eu bod yn cyrraedd y ffigur hwnnw, oherwydd roedd y targed yn y contract yn llym iawn. Mae hynny wedi golygu bod ganddynt lawer o seilwaith yn y ddaear. Ni chafodd unrhyw arian cyhoeddus ei ddefnyddio i dalu am unrhyw seilwaith na chafodd ei gwblhau. Felly, rydym wedi cael sgwrs hir gyda hwy ynglŷn â'r elfen fasnachol mewn perthynas â hynny - ynglŷn â phwy a ddylai dalu am hynny. Maent eisoes wedi buddsoddi'r arian hwnnw. A ddylai'r pwrs cyhoeddus dalu am y rhan olaf? Pam na allant ei wneud eu hunain? Mae angen trafodaeth, ac mae'r sgwrs honno'n mynd rhagddi ochr yn ochr â'r broses gaffael. Cawn weld beth fydd canlyniad y broses honno. Felly, os yw BT yn un o'r rhai sy'n gwneud y cais caffael, diau y byddant yn gwneud rhai cynigion yn rhan o hynny. Fel y dywedais wrth Janet Finch-Saunders yn ddiweddar, rydym yn gofyn am addewidion penodol - cynlluniau penodol ar gyfer safleoedd penodol. Felly, buaswn yn synnu'n fawr pe na baent wedi'u cynnwys, ond rydym yng nghanol y broses gaffael yn awr, felly nid oes gennyf unrhyw wybodaeth ynglŷn â beth y maent yn ei gynnig ar hyn o bryd.