English: I thank the Cabinet Secretary for that statement. I would like to express my gratitude to and admiration of the group of campaigners who have worked so hard over far too long a period in presenting their case with determination and dignity that there should be the inquiry that we are about to see. I've got to know many of them through the cross-party group, and I'd like to pay tribute to those individuals who have spoken through their pain, because of what they've had to live through over the past decades. I will name Lynne Kelly specifically for the work that she has done in leading and co-ordinating the campaign. And I'm pleased that you, as Cabinet Secretary, have been able to come to the meeting that perhaps most individuals attended, and where the message was conveyed so clearly that as Cabinet Secretary you could not but join them in their campaign. And I'm pleased that we have been able to take action on a cross-party basis, not only through the cross-party group, but also yourself and us as spokespeople speaking with one voice on the issue. It's also worth emphasising that the cross-party group of the Assembly has been determined from the outset, because of the lead provided by the campaigners, that there should be a member of the judiciary - that there should be a judge leading the inquiry. Others didn't feel that that was crucial, and I'm sure they had very good reasons for taking a different view, but these campaigners were determined, and I was pleased to hear this statement on the appointment of Mr Justice Langstaff. Two questions. First of all, are you as a Government going to be considering yourselves as stakeholders in the process that is happening now? Because all the stakeholders, including, I hope, the Welsh Government and ourselves as Members of this Parliament, need to try and contribute to the work that will take place through the inquiry, and I would like to know how you will feed in to the work of assisting Mr Justice Langstaff to draw up the remit. And in terms of that remit, one specific question: do you believe that we should look beyond what happened in the 1970s and 1980s, which is the core of the scandal? Yes, what happened then in terms of infected blood was a scandal, but it has been a scandal in terms of how we haven't got to this point until the year 2018. So, I'd be interested to know how you're going to try and influence the remit as a Government. But once again, we are moving in the right direction and the campaigners in Wales are still working hard and are keeping the pressure on as they seek the solutions that they deserve.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet am y datganiad yna. Mi hoffwn innau ddatgan fy niolch a'm edmygedd i'r grŵp o ymgyrchwyr sydd wedi bod mor ddygn dros gyfnod llawer rhy hir yn cyflwyno'u dadl efo penderfynoldeb ac urddas y dylid cael yr ymchwiliad rydyn ni ar fin ei gael. Mi rydw i wedi dod i nabod sawl un ohonyn nhw drwy'r grŵp trawsbleidiol. Mi liciwn i dalu teyrnged i'r unigolion hynny sydd wedi siarad drwy eu poen oherwydd yr hyn maen nhw wedi byw drwyddo fo dros y degawdau diwethaf. Mi wnaf enwi Lynne Kelly yn benodol am y gwaith mae hi wedi bod yn ei wneud yn arwain a chydlynu'r ymgyrch. Ac rwy'n falch eich bod chi fel Ysgrifennydd Cabinet wedi gallu dod i, o bosib, y cyfarfod lle daeth y mwyaf o unigolion iddo fo, a lle roedd y neges mor glir fel na allech chi fel Ysgrifennydd Cabinet beidio ag ymuno a bod yn gefn iddyn nhw yn eu hymgyrch. Ac rwy'n falch ein bod ni wedi gallu gweithredu yn drawsbleidiol, nid yn unig drwy'r grŵp trawsbleidiol, ond hefyd chithau a ninnau fel llefaryddion yn siarad ag un llais. Hefyd, mae'n werth pwysleisio bod y grŵp trawsbleidiol yma yn y Cynulliad wedi bod yn benderfynol o'r cychwyn, oherwydd arweiniad yr ymgyrchwyr, y dylid cael aelod o'r farnwriaeth - y dylid cael barnwr yn arwain yr ymchwil. Nid oedd eraill yn meddwl bod hynny'n gwbl bwysig. Rwy'n siŵr bod rhesymau da iawn ganddyn nhw dros gymryd barn wahanol, ond mi roedd yr ymgyrchwyr yma yng Nghymru yn benderfynol, ac mi roeddwn i'n falch o glywed y datganiad ynglŷn â phenodiad Mr Justice Langstaff. Dau gwestiwn. Yn gyntaf, a ydych chi fel Llywodraeth yn mynd i ystyried eich hunain yn rhanddeiliaid yn y broses sy'n digwydd rŵan? Oherwydd mae eisiau i'r rhanddeiliaid i gyd, yn cynnwys, rwy'n gobeithio, Llywodraeth Cymru, a ninnau fel Aelodau o'r Senedd yma, drio cyfrannu at y gwaith a fydd yn mynd ymlaen drwy'r ymchwiliad. Ac mi hoffwn i weld sut fyddwch chi'n bwydo i mewn i'r gwaith o helpu'r barnwr Mr Justice Langstaff i lunio'r cylch gorchwyl. Ac o ran y cylch gorchwyl ei hun, un cwestiwn penodol: a ydych chi'n credu y dylid edrych y tu hwnt i'r hyn ddigwyddodd yn ôl yn y 1970au a'r 1980au, sef gwraidd y sgandal? Oedd, mi roedd hi'n sgandal beth ddigwyddodd bryd hynny o ran heintio gwaed, ond mae wedi bod yn sgandal, wrth gwrs, sut rydym ni wedi gallu peidio â dod at y pwynt yma tan y flwyddyn 2018. Felly, mi fyddai gen i ddiddordeb mewn gwybod sut rydych chi am drio dylanwadu fel Llywodraeth ar ffurfio'r cylch gorchwyl yna. Ond, unwaith eto, rydym ni'n symud i'r cyfeiriad iawn, ac mae'r ymgyrchwyr yng Nghymru yn cadw'r maen i'r wal ac yn cadw'r pwysau ymlaen wrth iddyn nhw chwilio am yr atebion maen nhw'n eu haeddu.