techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: First Minister, as a dog lover, I know that your dog is often your best friend and, as has been said already this afternoon, is very much a family member. Now, it's deeply disturbing to know that criminals are targeting dogs and other pets to steal. These people are an absolute disgrace, an absolute disgrace. First Minister, what conversations have Welsh Government Ministers had with the police and the Home Office to ensure that these criminals are brought to justice, and what conversations have you had about the impact of UK Conservative police cuts and their failure to deliver on the promised 62 extra police officers in Deeside?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, fel un sy'n hoff o gŵn, rwy'n gwybod mai eich ci yw eich ffrind gorau yn aml ac, fel y dywedwyd eisoes y prynhawn yma, mae'n sicr yn aelod o'r teulu. Nawr, mae'n peri pryder mawr i wybod bod troseddwyr yn targedu cŵn ac anifeiliaid anwes eraill i'w dwyn. Mae'r bobl hyn yn gwbl warthus, yn gwbl warthus. Prif Weinidog, pa sgyrsiau y mae Gweinidogion Llywodraeth Cymru wedi eu cael gyda'r heddlu a'r Swyddfa Gartref i sicrhau bod y troseddwyr hyn yn cael eu dwyn i gyfiawnder, a pha sgyrsiau ydych chi wedi eu cael am effaith toriadau heddlu Ceidwadwyr y DU a'u methiant i ddarparu'r 62 o heddweision ychwanegol a addawyd yng Nglannau Dyfrdwy?
English: Dirprwy Lywydd, our assessment is clear: the UK shared prosperity fund fails to honour repeated public commitments made by the UK Government and 'leave' campaigners in Wales that exiting the European Union would mean not a penny less and no devolved powers lost to Wales.
Welsh: Dirprwy Lywydd, mae ein hasesiad yn eglur: mae cronfa ffyniant gyffredin y DU yn methu ag anrhydeddu ymrwymiadau cyhoeddus mynych a wnaed gan Lywodraeth y DU ac ymgyrchwyr 'gadael' yng Nghymru na fyddai gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd yn golygu ceiniog yn llai ac na fyddai unrhyw bwerau datganoledig yn cael eu colli i Gymru.
English: Thank you, First Minister. We have heard much but seen little of either the shared prosperity fund or the levelling-up fund, both of which are becoming more and more like a publicly funded Conservative election fund than a serious attempt to share the prosperity of the United Kingdom. First Minister, do you share my concern that Wales will lose out, that investment funding in Wales will be cut, and that support for Welsh communities recovering from COVID will be cut by a UK Tory Government that has, over the last year, delivered more funds to its friends and donors than it has invested to sustain the Welsh economy? Therefore, do you agree with me that we can only trust the Welsh Government to deliver for Wales, and not a Tory UK Government that only looks at us with disdain from afar?
Welsh: Diolch, Prif Weinidog. Rydym ni wedi clywed llawer ond wedi gweld ychydig iawn o naill ai'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin na'r gronfa lefelu, y mae'r ddwy ohonyn nhw yn dod yn fwyfwy tebyg i gronfa etholiadol Geidwadol wedi'i hariannu gan y cyhoedd nag ymgais o ddifrif i rannu ffyniant y Deyrnas Unedig. Prif Weinidog, a ydych chi'n rhannu fy mhryder i y bydd Cymru ar ei cholled, y bydd cyllid buddsoddi yng Nghymru yn cael ei dorri, ac y bydd cymorth i gymunedau Cymru sy'n adfer yn sgil COVID yn cael ei dorri gan Lywodraeth Dorïaidd yn y DU sydd, dros y flwyddyn ddiwethaf, wedi darparu mwy o arian i'w ffrindiau a'i rhoddwyr nag y mae wedi ei fuddsoddi i gynnal economi Cymru? Felly, a ydych chi'n cytuno â mi mai dim ond Llywodraeth Cymru y gallwn ni ymddiried ynddi i gyflawni dros Gymru, ac nid Llywodraeth Dorïaidd y DU sy'n gwneud dim ond edrych arnom ni gyda dirmyg o bell?
English: Speaking in the House of Commons last month, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Wales said the amount of money that's going to be spent in Wales when the shared prosperity fund comes in 'will be identical to or higher than the amount of money that was spent in Wales that came from the European Union', and that the UK will continue to engage with the Welsh Government as they develop the fund's investment framework for publication. Speaking in a joint meeting of the Senedd's finance and external affairs committees last week, the Secretary of State for Wales said the funding being made available to Wales, underpinned by the 'not a penny less' guarantee, will provide opportunities for Wales to do even better than it has previously done in terms of funding streams, and that they're asking local authorities to join with stakeholders, their MSs, Welsh Government officials and with MPs to come up with really innovative ideas either as individual authorities or jointly with other authorities, and bid for the money available, where the lessons learned from this year will form the basis of the actual shared prosperity fund, which is a much larger package of money from the end of 2021 onwards. How will you engage with that and avoid, as you say we must, narrow, partisan and politically motivated approaches?
Welsh: Wrth siarad yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin fis diwethaf, dywedodd Is-ysgrifennydd Gwladol Seneddol Cymru y bydd y swm o arian sy'n mynd i gael ei wario yng Nghymru pan gyflwynir y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin yn union yr un faint neu'n fwy na'r swm o arian a wariwyd yng Nghymru a oedd yn dod oddi wrth yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, ac y bydd y DU yn parhau i ymgysylltu â Llywodraeth Cymru wrth iddyn nhw ddatblygu fframwaith buddsoddi y gronfa i'w gyhoeddi. Wrth siarad mewn cyfarfod ar y cyd o bwyllgorau cyllid a materion allanol y Senedd yr wythnos diwethaf, dywedodd Ysgrifennydd Gwladol Cymru y bydd yr arian sy'n cael ei ddarparu i Gymru, wedi'i ategu gan y sicrwydd 'dim ceiniog yn llai', yn rhoi cyfleoedd i Gymru wneud hyd yn oed yn well nag y mae hi wedi ei wneud o'r blaen o ran ffrydiau ariannu, a'u bod yn gofyn i awdurdodau lleol ymuno â rhanddeiliaid, eu Haelodau o'r Senedd, swyddogion Llywodraeth Cymru a chydag Aelodau Seneddol i feddwl am syniadau gwirioneddol arloesol naill ai fel awdurdodau unigol neu ar y cyd ag awdurdodau eraill, a gwneud cais am yr arian sydd ar gael, lle bydd y gwersi a ddysgwyd eleni yn ffurfio sail i'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin wirioneddol, sy'n becyn llawer mwy o arian o ddiwedd 2021 ymlaen. Sut gwnewch chi ymgysylltu â hynny ac yn sgil hynny osgoi, fel y dywedwch y mae'n rhaid i ni ei wneud, dulliau cul, pleidiol a chyda cymhelliant gwleidyddol?
English: The fact that nonsense is spoken on the floor of the House of Commons doesn't make it any less nonsensical. And it's plainly nonsensical. Next year, the community renewal fund - the latest rebadging of the shared prosperity fund - is worth £220 million for the whole of the United Kingdom. Wales alone had £375 million in structural funds. And we're not guaranteed - to use that word - a single penny of it. It is a UK fund on a bidding basis. There is no money in it that says 'Wales' on it at all. You'll be able to bid and then a Tory Minister in Whitehall will make decisions against the track record that I just set out for Members here. In what possible sense - in what possible sense - could anybody defend that as a way of treating Wales? We are being cheated out of money, we are being stolen from when it comes to our powers, and the unfolding record of the UK Government in Westminster short-changes Wales every single day.
Welsh: Nid yw'r ffaith bod lol yn cael ei siarad ar lawr Tŷ'r Cyffredin yn ei wneud yn ddim llai disynnwyr. Ac mae'n amlwg yn ddisynnwyr. Y flwyddyn nesaf, mae'r gronfa adnewyddu cymunedol - yr enw diweddaraf ar y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin - werth £220 miliwn ar gyfer y Deyrnas Unedig gyfan. Roedd gan Gymru ar ei phen ei hun £375 miliwn mewn cronfeydd strwythurol. Ac nid oes yr un geiniog ohono wedi'i sicrhau - i ddefnyddio'r gair hwnnw. Mae'n gronfa y DU ar sail ceisiadau. Nid oes unrhyw arian ynddi sy'n dweud 'Cymru' arno o gwbl. Byddwch yn gallu gwneud cais ac yna bydd Gweinidog Torïaidd yn Whitehall yn gwneud penderfyniadau yn erbyn yr hanes yr wyf i newydd ei chyflwyno i'r Aelodau yn y fan yma. Ym mha ystyr posibl - ym mha ystyr posibl - y gallai unrhyw un amddiffyn hynny fel ffordd o drin Cymru? Rydym ni'n cael ein twyllo allan o arian, rydym ni'n dioddef lladrad pan ddaw i'n pwerau, ac mae hanes parhaus llywodraeth y DU yn San Steffan yn darparu cyllid annigonol i Gymru bob un dydd.
English: Test, trace, protect is an essential mechanism to detect, control and protect people from the spread of the virus. The public service partnership approach that we have taken in Wales has safeguarded public funds, used them with probity and integrity, and has efficiently delivered a highly effective system for Wales.
Welsh: Mae profi, olrhain, diogelu yn ddull hanfodol o ganfod, rheoli a diogelu pobl rhag lledaeniad y feirws. Mae'r dull partneriaeth gwasanaethau cyhoeddus yr ydym ni wedi ei fabwysiadu yng Nghymru wedi diogelu arian cyhoeddus, wedi ei ddefnyddio yn onest ac yn ddidwyll, ac wedi darparu system effeithiol iawn i Gymru mewn modd effeithlon.
English: First Minister, thank you for that answer. The reason I raise this question is because, shockingly, it was reported last week, and I quote, that 'there is no evidence to show that the UK Conservative Government's multibillion-pound test and trace programme to combat COVID-19 in England contributed to a reduction in coronavirus infection levels.' But worse still, First Minister, the Chair of the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee said that the enormous amount spent on this scheme leaves the impression that the public purse has been used like a cash point, totalling £37 billion over two years. This is in stark contrast to NHS Wales's test, trace and protect service, which as of the end of February I understand had reached 99.6 per cent of positive cases who were eligible, together with 95 per cent of their close contacts. Would you agree with me, First Minister, that it is definitely better to invest taxpayers' hard-earned money into tried-and-tested public services that have a strong track record of delivery, and that the £37 billion wasted by the UK Government frankly makes their offer of a below-inflation 1 per cent pay rise to nurses even more darn insulting?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, diolch am yr ateb yna. Y rheswm pam yr wyf i'n codi'r cwestiwn hwn yw oherwydd, yn frawychus, adroddwyd yr wythnos diwethaf, a dyfynnaf, 'nad oes unrhyw dystiolaeth i ddangos bod rhaglen profi ac olrhain gwerth biliynau o bunnoedd Llywodraeth Geidwadol y DU i fynd i'r afael â COVID-19 yn Lloegr wedi cyfrannu at ostyngiad i lefelau heintiad coronafeirws.' Ond yn waeth byth, Prif Weinidog, dywedodd Cadeirydd Pwyllgor Cyfrifon Cyhoeddus Tŷ'r Cyffredin bod y swm enfawr a wariwyd ar y cynllun hwn yn gadael yr argraff bod pwrs y wlad wedi cael ei ddefnyddio fel pwynt arian parod, gan ddod i gyfanswm o £37 biliwn dros ddwy flynedd. Mae hyn yn gwrthgyferbynnu'n llwyr â gwasanaeth profi, olrhain a diogelu GIG Cymru, a oedd, ddiwedd mis Chwefror, yn ôl yr hyn a ddeallaf, wedi cyrraedd 99.6 y cant o achosion positif a oedd yn gymwys, ynghyd â 95 y cant o'u cysylltiadau agos. A fyddech chi'n cytuno â mi, Prif Weinidog, ei bod hi'n sicr yn well buddsoddi arian y mae trethdalwyr yn gweithio yn galed i'w ennill mewn gwasanaethau cyhoeddus profedig sydd â hanes cadarn o gyflawni, a bod y £37 biliwn a wastraffwyd gan Lywodraeth y DU, a dweud y gwir, yn gwneud eu cynnig o godiad cyflog o 1 y cant yn is na chwyddiant i nyrsys hyd yn oed yn fwy sarhaus?
English: Nice try to the previous speaker for a general 'doing the evil Tory Government in Westminster down'. First Minister, I did hear your response about private versus public, but of course we all know it was privately employed Kate Bingham who actually very, very successfully protected the United Kingdom, including Wales, on the vaccines, by buying, investing and supporting all of those amazing scientists. So, let's hear it for the private sector as well. When you talk about having a highly effective test, trace and protect system for Wales, that's exactly what I want, but let's be clear: the World Health Organization says that a successful contact tracing system is marked by being able to trace 80 per cent of contacts within three days. Your test, trace and protect system reaches 90 per cent of contacts - well done - but within nine days after that initial contact. There is a lot of spreading within that nine-day window, significantly more than the world health authority's recommendation that it should be three days. So, can you please tell us what actions you will be taking to try to cut that lag from nine days to the WHO's recommended three days, in order to ensure that here in Wales we have the most effective test, trace and protect system?
Welsh: Cynnig da gan y siaradwr blaenorol i 'redeg ar y Llywodraeth Dorïaidd ddrwg yn San Steffan'. Prif Weinidog, clywais eich ymateb ynglŷn â phreifat yn erbyn cyhoeddus, ond rydym ni i gyd yn gwybod, wrth gwrs, mai Kate Bingham a gyflogwyd yn breifat a wnaeth ddiogelu'r Deyrnas Unedig, gan gynnwys Cymru, mewn gwirionedd, yn llwyddiannus dros ben, o ran y brechlynnau, trwy brynu, buddsoddi a chefnogi'r holl wyddonwyr rhyfeddol hynny. Felly, gadewch i ni glywed clod i'r sector preifat hefyd. Pan fyddwch chi'n sôn am gael system profi, olrhain a diogelu hynod effeithiol i Gymru, dyna'n union yr wyf i ei eisiau, ond gadewch i ni fod yn eglur: mae Sefydliad Iechyd y Byd yn dweud mai system olrhain cysylltiadau lwyddiannus yw un sy'n gallu olrhain 80 y cant o gysylltiadau o fewn tri diwrnod. Mae eich system profi, olrhain a diogelu chi yn cyrraedd 90 y cant o gysylltiadau - da iawn - ond o fewn naw diwrnod ar ôl y cyswllt cychwynnol hwnnw. Mae llawer o ledaenu yn ystod y cyfnod hwnnw o naw diwrnod, sy'n llawer mwy nag argymhelliad awdurdod iechyd y byd mai tri diwrnod y dylai fod. Felly, a allwch chi ddweud wrthym ni pa gamau y byddwch chi'n eu cymryd i geisio torri'r bwlch hwnnw o naw diwrnod i'r tri diwrnod a argymhellir gan Sefydliad Iechyd y Byd, er mwyn sicrhau bod gennym ni'r system profi, olrhain a diogelu fwyaf effeithiol yma yng Nghymru?
English: I don't recognise the nine-day figure at all. The Member will be very pleased to know, given her concerns, that 90 per cent of close contacts last week were reached within 24 hours, and that 93 per cent of index cases were reached within 24 hours. So, where the nine days comes from, I do not know, but last week those were the figures that were reported. That's a good deal better than the three days that the WHO has identified, and I think demonstrates once again the success of the system we have here in Wales.
Welsh: Nid wyf i'n cydnabod y ffigur naw diwrnod o gwbl. Bydd yr Aelod yn falch iawn o wybod, o ystyried ei phryderon, y cyrhaeddwyd 90 y cant o gysylltiadau agos yr wythnos diwethaf o fewn 24 awr, ac y cyrhaeddwyd 93 y cant o achosion mynegai o fewn 24 awr. Felly, o ble mae'r naw diwrnod yn dod, wn i ddim, ond yr wythnos diwethaf dyna'r ffigurau a adroddwyd. Mae hynny yn llawer iawn gwell na'r tridiau y mae Sefydliad Iechyd y Byd wedi ei nodi, ac rwy'n credu bod hynny yn dangos unwaith eto lwyddiant y system sydd gennym ni yma yng Nghymru.
English: I thank the Member for that, Llywydd. Access to primary care services has changed rapidly across Wales over the past year. Services have had to adapt so that patients can access primary care in a safe and effective manner. Many are using digital technology to do so.
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Aelod am hynna, Llywydd. Mae mynediad at wasanaethau gofal sylfaenol wedi newid yn gyflym ledled Cymru yn ystod y flwyddyn ddiwethaf. Bu'n rhaid i wasanaethau addasu fel bod cleifion yn gallu cael mynediad at ofal sylfaenol mewn modd diogel ac effeithiol. Mae llawer ohonyn nhw'n defnyddio technoleg ddigidol i wneud hynny.
English: I'm grateful to the First Minister for his answer. Of course health boards have had to make changes in the provision of primary care. One instance in my region is that the surgery in the village of Trimsaran has had to be temporarily closed so that that is kept as a space that can be used for treating COVID patients if necessary. The community has accepted this, but they are concerned with the immediate situation, because they have to travel now to Kidwelly, and at the same time the bus services have been cut because of COVID - a perfect storm, but perhaps unavoidable. But there is a suspicion that the health board may use the COVID crisis to permanently close that surgery. Obviously, I think we'd want to congratulate the health board on how they've handled the crisis, and these operational matters are not matters for the First Minister, but can I ask the First Minister today if he can reassure my constituents in Trimsaran that the Welsh Government does not expect any changes to primary care services that have been made because of the COVID crisis to be extended beyond the pandemic without proper assessment and consultation?
Welsh: Rwy'n ddiolchgar i'r Prif Weinidog am ei ateb. Wrth gwrs, bu'n rhaid i fyrddau iechyd wneud newidiadau i'r ddarpariaeth o ofal sylfaenol. Un enghraifft yn fy rhanbarth i yw y bu'n rhaid cau'r feddygfa ym mhentref Trimsaran dros dro fel ei bod yn cael ei chadw fel lle y gellir ei ddefnyddio i drin cleifion COVID os oes angen. Mae'r gymuned wedi derbyn hyn, ond maen nhw'n bryderus am y sefyllfa uniongyrchol, oherwydd mae'n rhaid iddyn nhw deithio i Gydweli nawr, ac ar yr un pryd mae'r gwasanaethau bysiau wedi cael eu cwtogi oherwydd COVID - storm berffaith, ond efallai na ellir ei hosgoi. Ond mae amheuaeth y gallai'r bwrdd iechyd ddefnyddio argyfwng COVID i gau'r feddygfa honno yn barhaol. Yn amlwg, rwy'n credu y byddem ni eisiau llongyfarch y bwrdd iechyd ar sut y mae wedi ymdrin â'r argyfwng, ac nid yw'r materion gweithredol hyn yn faterion i'r Prif Weinidog, ond a gaf i ofyn i'r Prif Weinidog heddiw a allai ef dawelu meddyliau fy etholwyr i yn Nhrimsaran nad yw Llywodraeth Cymru yn disgwyl i unrhyw newidiadau i wasanaethau gofal sylfaenol sydd wedi eu gwneud oherwydd argyfwng COVID gael eu hymestyn y tu hwnt i'r pandemig heb asesiad ac ymgynghoriad priodol?
English: Llywydd, over 4,000 businesses in Pembrokeshire have received more than £91 million in grants since the start of the pandemic in order to support that local economy.
Welsh: Llywydd, mae dros 4,000 o fusnesau yn Sir Benfro wedi cael mwy na £91 miliwn mewn grantiau ers dechrau'r pandemig er mwyn cefnogi yr economi leol honno.
English: Thank you for that response, First Minister. Now, the Welsh Government's announcement on Friday was met with particular frustration from non-essential local businesses in Pembrokeshire, some of whom had planned for potential reopening this week and incurred costs to do so. You previously suggested that businesses selling non-essential products should look to reopen from next Monday, and now that's been put back until 12 April. In light of this change in direction from the Welsh Government, can you confirm exactly what scientific evidence was used to continue to prohibit the reopening of non-essential retail outlets until 12 April, and can you confirm that the Welsh Government will recoup the costs that have been made by businesses, so that, at the very least, those businesses are not further disadvantaged financially as a result of the delay in reopening non-essential retail outlets?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ymateb yna, Prif Weinidog. Nawr, cafodd cyhoeddiad Llywodraeth Cymru ddydd Gwener ymateb o rwystredigaeth arbennig ymhlith busnesau lleol nad ydyn nhw'n rhai hanfodol yn Sir Benfro, yr oedd rhai ohonyn nhw wedi cynllunio ar gyfer ailagor posibl yr wythnos hon ac wedi mynd i gostau i wneud hynny. Awgrymwyd gennych chi yn y gorffennol y dylai busnesau sy'n gwerthu cynhyrchion nad ydyn nhw'n hanfodol geisio ailagor o ddydd Llun nesaf, ac mae hynny wedi ei oedi hyd at 12 Ebrill erbyn hyn. Yng ngoleuni'r newid cyfeiriad hwn gan Lywodraeth Cymru, a allwch chi gadarnhau yn union pa dystiolaeth wyddonol a ddefnyddiwyd i barhau i atal ailagor siopau manwerthu nad ydyn nhw'n hanfodol tan 12 Ebrill, ac a allwch chi gadarnhau y bydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn digolledu busnesau am y costau yr aethpwyd iddynt, fel na fydd y busnesau hynny, o leiaf, o dan anfantais ariannol ychwanegol o ganlyniad i'r oedi cyn ailagor siopau manwerthu nad ydyn nhw'n hanfodol?
English: Llywydd, we are already taking forward many of the suggestions made by the Burns commission. Its ambitious set of recommendations will lead to significant transport improvements for the region. The interim report of the Hendy review highlights the case for improvements to the south Wales main line, as proposed by the commission.
Welsh: Llywydd, rydym ni eisoes yn bwrw ymlaen â llawer o'r awgrymiadau a wnaed gan gomisiwn Burns. Bydd ei gyfres uchelgeisiol o argymhellion yn arwain at welliannau trafnidiaeth sylweddol i'r rhanbarth. Mae adroddiad dros dro adolygiad Hendy yn tynnu sylw at yr achos dros welliannau i brif reilffordd de Cymru, fel y cynigiwyd gan y comisiwn.
English: Thank you. First Minister, last week, in response to my question on Newport City Council's support for a referendum for an M4 relief road, the Minister for Housing and Local Government said, 'If there is a call for a local referendum, then we're certainly happy to work with Newport council to see how that might be accomplished.' Julie James then went on to say she was all in favour of local people having a large say in what happens in their region or area. You've told us today how important local democracy is to you, First Minister. So, therefore, would you hold a referendum on an M4 relief road, as called for by Newport council?
Welsh: Diolch. Prif Weinidog, yr wythnos diwethaf, mewn ymateb i'm cwestiwn am gefnogaeth Cyngor Dinas Casnewydd i refferendwm ar ffordd liniaru'r M4, dywedodd y Gweinidog Tai a Llywodraeth Leol, Os oes galw am refferendwm lleol, yna rydym yn sicr yn hapus i weithio gyda chyngor Casnewydd i weld sut y gellid cyflawni hynny. Aeth Julie James ymlaen wedyn i ddweud ei bod hi o blaid pobl leol yn cael cyfle sylweddol i leisio barn ar yr hyn sy'n digwydd yn eu rhanbarth neu eu hardal. Rydych chi wedi dweud wrthym ni heddiw pa mor bwysig yw democratiaeth leol i chi, Prif Weinidog. Felly, o ganlyniad, a fyddech chi'n cynnal refferendwm ar ffordd liniaru'r M4, fel y galwyd amdano gan gyngor Casnewydd?
English: Llywydd, I don't have anything to add to what my colleague has already told the Member on that matter. I'm very glad though to hear her conversion to local decision making. She will feel as aggrieved as I do, therefore, that Ministers in her Government in London continually pretend that they have powers to make decisions in relation to an M4 relief road - they don't. Those decisions are properly made here, and the Member's conversion to that is very welcome.
Welsh: Llywydd, nid oes gennyf ddim i'w ychwanegu at yr hyn y mae fy nghyd-Aelod eisoes wedi'i ddweud wrth yr Aelod am y mater hwnnw. Rwy'n falch iawn serch hynny o'i chlywed yn troi at benderfyniadau lleol. Bydd yn teimlo mor ddig â mi, felly, fod Gweinidogion yn ei Llywodraeth yn Llundain yn esgus yn barhaus fod ganddyn nhw bwerau i wneud penderfyniadau yn gysylltiedig â ffordd liniaru'r M4 - does ganddyn nhw ddim. Gwneir y penderfyniadau hynny'n briodol yn y fan yma, ac mae croeso mawr i dröedigaeth yr Aelod at hynny.
English: The next item is questions to the Counsel General and Minister for European Transition, in respect of his law officer responsibilities. And the first question is from Huw Irranca-Davies.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf, felly, yw'r cwestiynau i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol a'r Gweinidog Pontio Ewropeaidd, yn rhinwedd ei gyfrifoldebau fel swyddog cyfreithiol. Ac mae'r cwestiwn cyntaf gan Huw Irranca-Davies.
English: The implications are clear: this is an attempt to take things back to decades ago, when Westminster supposedly knew best. Bypassing the elected institutions of Wales is not just an insult to the people of Wales, it will clearly result in worse outcomes for Wales as well.
Welsh: Mae'r goblygiadau'n glir: mae hon yn ymgais i fynd â phethau'n ôl i ddegawdau yn ôl, pan oedd San Steffan yn gwybod orau. Nid sarhad ar bobl Cymru yn unig yw anwybyddu sefydliadau etholedig Cymru, a bydd yn amlwg yn arwain at ganlyniadau gwaeth i Gymru hefyd.