English: Certainly, I think we need to return to the process of the WESPs. All the WESPs have now been adopted by Welsh Government, but, of course, the Government had an option not to approve those. So, our understanding is, through the latest letter that was received before the summer, that the Government has approved every local authority's WESP. So, that is one point in terms of the approval process first of all. But, after approval, I do think that we have that assurance within local authorities' democratic fora to hold services to account, but, as I said, perhaps the expectations need to be strengthened, because that happens in some areas through the language forum, whereas in others, it happens through the cabinet. So, what are those consistent systems that could be adopted to hold people to account for the delivery of their WESP? Because, as Councillor Price said, they are 10-year plans. There is potential for any long-term plan to be the responsibility of someone else in the future, and we need to ensure that these milestones are annual, or every two years, and that they do provide reports that we are on track to deliver against these targets. So, again, historically, we do have some very good examples of councils that have met the targets of their WESPs, and I think we need to learn from that good practice. But it also, in my view, relates to providing assurances that the Welsh language is central to our work, not just as local authorities, but in all areas. When we discuss anything related to education, we should be discussing the Welsh language as an integral part of that, and when we're talking about the curriculum, or additional learning needs, all of our major reforms in education - which are crucial at the moment - should have the Welsh language at their heart and not at the periphery, as is the case on occasion.
Welsh: Yn sicr, dwi'n credu bod angen i ni fynd nôl at y broses o'r CSCAau fan hyn. Mae pob CSCA wedi cael ei fabwysiadu erbyn hyn gan Lywodraeth Cymru, ond, wrth gwrs, roedd gyda'r Llywodraeth yr opsiwn i beidio eu cymeradwyo nhw. Felly, ein dealltwriaeth ni, wrth gwrs, drwy'r llythyr diweddaraf cyn yr haf, yw bod y Llywodraeth wedi cymeradwyo'r CSCAau hynny. Felly, dwi'n credu bod hwnna'n un pwynt o ran cymeradwyaeth a'r broses gymeradwyo i ddechrau. Ond ar ôl cymeradwyo, dwi'n credu bod gyda ni'r sicrwydd yna oddi fewn i fforymau gwleidyddol a democrataidd awdurdodau i ddwyn gwasanaethau yn atebol am sicrwydd, ond fel rôn i'n ei ddweud, efallai bod angen cryfhau'r disgwyliadau ynglŷn â bod hynny efallai mewn rhai llefydd yn digwydd drwy'r fforwm iaith er enghraifft, ble, mewn llefydd eraill, mae e'n digwydd drwy'r cabinet. Felly, beth efallai yw'r systemau cyson hynny y gellid eu defnyddio i ddwyn pobl yn atebol am weithredoedd eu CSCAau? Achos fel roedd y Cynghorydd Price yn ei ddweud, mae nhw'n gynlluniau 10 mlynedd. Mae yna botensial gydag unrhyw gynllun hirdymor eu bod nhw yn digwydd yn oes rhywun arall, ac mae eisiau sicrhau bod y cerrig milltir yma yn flynyddol, neu bob dwy flynedd, ac yn sicr iawn, iawn yn rhoi adroddiadau ein bod ni ar drac i gyrraedd y targedau yma. Felly, eto, mae gyda ni yn hanesyddol enghreifftiau da iawn o gynghorau wedi dod i gwrdd â thargedau eu CSCAau nhw, a dwi'n credu bod rhaid i ni ddysgu o'r arferion da hynny yn ogystal, ond mae e hefyd yn ymwneud, yn fy marn i, gyda sicrwydd bod y Gymraeg yng nghanol ein gwaith ni bob tro, nid jest fel llywodraeth leol, ond ym mhob maes. Pan rŷn ni'n trafod unrhyw beth yn ymwneud ag addysg, mi ddylen ni fod yn trafod y Gymraeg yn ei chanol hi. Felly, pan rŷn ni'n siarad ynglŷn â'r cwricwlwm, pan rŷn ni'n siarad ynglŷn ag anghenion dysgu ychwanegol, mi ddylai pob un o'n diwygiadau mawr ni ym maes addysg - sy'n hanfodol ar hyn o bryd - wirioneddol fod â'r Gymraeg yn eu canol nhw, ac nid, ar adegau, ar eu hymyl nhw.