techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you very much for that answer, Minister. Last year, the Home Builders Federation stated that poor planning and the higher costs associated with building homes in Wales have compromised investment. Now, house builders express concern that the lack of detail over the potential new tax on vacant development land could further discourage larger developers from investing in Wales. Does the First Minister agree that increasing the burden of tax and regulation on house builders will not increase the supply of new homes that Wales desperately needs at this moment? Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn am yr ateb yna, Gweinidog. Y llynedd, dywedodd y Ffederasiwn Adeiladwyr Cartrefi bod cynllunio gwael a'r costau uwch sy'n gysylltiedig ag adeiladu cartrefi yng Nghymru wedi peryglu buddsoddiad. Nawr, mae adeiladwyr tai yn mynegi pryder y gallai diffyg manylion ynghylch y dreth newydd bosibl ar dir datblygu gwag ddarbwyllo datblygwyr ymhellach rhag buddsoddi yng Nghymru. A yw'r Prif Weinidog yn cytuno na fydd cynyddu baich treth a rheoleiddio ar adeiladwyr tai yn cynyddu'r cyflenwad o gartrefi newydd y mae Cymru eu hangen yn daer ar hyn o bryd? Diolch.
English: Well, if he's talking about the sprinklers, can I remind him that his own party didn't oppose the introduction of the sprinklers legislation? Of course, we always seem to look to strike a balance between what is appropriate regulation and then, of course - [ Interruption.] He was in a different party at the time - the Member is correct - so I'll have to revise the point that I made. He supported the sprinklers regulation, I believe, on that basis. We look to strike a balance between appropriate regulation and encouraging house building. We've done it through the social housing grant. We've made sure that we are not losing council houses through them being sold, to make sure that they're kept in the public housing stock. We've made sure as well, of course, that, through Help to Buy Wales, there are options open for people to buy houses, which they otherwise wouldn't have the option to do. So, we have a good record when it comes to housing, and we are on track to meet our target.
Welsh: Wel, os yw'n sôn am y systemau chwistrellu, a gaf i ei atgoffa na wnaeth ei blaid ei hun wrthwynebu cyflwyno'r ddeddfwriaeth systemau chwistrellu? Wrth gwrs, ymddengys ein bod ni bob amser yn ceisio sicrhau cydbwysedd rhwng yr hyn sy'n rheoleiddio priodol ac yna, wrth gwrs - [ Torri ar draws.] Roedd mewn plaid wahanol ar y pryd - mae'r Aelod yn gywir - felly bydd rhaid i mi ddiwygio'r pwynt a wneuthum. Cefnogodd y rheoliad systemau chwistrellu, rwy'n credu, ar y sail honno. Ein nod yw sicrhau cydbwysedd rhwng rheoleiddio priodol ac annog adeiladu tai. Rydym ni wedi ei wneud drwy'r grant tai cymdeithasol. Rydym ni wedi gwneud yn siŵr nad ydym ni'n colli tai cyngor drwy eu gwerthu, i wneud yn siŵr eu bod nhw'n cael eu cadw yn y stoc tai cyhoeddus. Rydym ni wedi sicrhau hefyd, wrth gwrs, bod dewisiadau, trwy Cymorth i Brynu Cymru, ar gael i bobl i brynu tai, na fyddai'r dewis ganddynt i'w wneud fel arall. Felly, mae gennym ni hanes da pan ddaw i dai, ac rydym ni ar y trywydd iawn i gyrraedd ein targed.
English: I would argue that it's important that we address housing need far more, in fact, than we address housing demand. And housing need is those people on lowest incomes who aren't even recognised on the demand curve. Local development plans hopelessly fail to address housing need, and instead deliver expensive executive accommodation in areas like Caerphilly, in the south of my constituency. They don't deliver affordable housing. Will the First Minister accept that more needs to be done to deliver affordable housing, and particularly work with local authorities and registered social landlords to deliver affordable housing in the northern reaches of the communities that I represent, and recognise that LDPs, at this point in time, are failing to do that?
Welsh: Byddwn yn dadlau ei bod hi'n bwysig ein bod ni'n rhoi llawer mwy o sylw i anghenion tai, mewn gwirionedd, nag yr ydym ni'n ei roi i alw am dai. Ac anghenion tai yw'r bobl hynny â'r incwm isaf nad ydynt hyd yn oed yn cael eu cydnabod ar y gromlin galw. Mae cynlluniau datblygu lleol yn methu'n anobeithiol â mynd i'r afael ag anghenion tai, ac yn hytrach yn darparu llety uwchraddol drud mewn ardaloedd fel Caerffili, yn ardal ddeheuol fy etholaeth i. Nid ydynt yn darparu tai fforddiadwy. A wnaiff y Prif Weinidog dderbyn bod angen gwneud mwy i ddarparu tai fforddiadwy, ac yn enwedig gweithio gydag awdurdodau lleol a landlordiaid cymdeithasol cofrestredig i ddarparu tai fforddiadwy yn ardaloedd gogleddol y cymunedau yr wyf i'n eu cynrychioli, a chydnabod bod CDLl, ar hyn o bryd, yn methu â gwneud hynny?
English: LDPs have to be up to date. The difficulty of running a local authority is that if any local authority has a development plan where the five-year housing supply is no longer relevant, they are at risk of speculative housing developments, and it is hugely important that there is a development plan in place. But his point is well made. It is hugely important that there is a proper balance between houses and the availability of housing according to what people can afford. That's why, of course, local authorities can retain the money and build new council homes, following the successful exit of the housing revenue accounts subsidy system, so that local authorities can build council houses again. We have the affordable housing grant, of course, which looks to help people to get accommodation that is affordable to them, and, of course, there's making sure that people don't become homeless in the first place - Supporting People is an example of that. We have to make sure - and we've been successful in doing that - that people don't actually become homeless. But it is right that local authorities should be aware, as they develop their development plans, of the need to secure the right balance of housing; they can't all just be housing at one end of the market - that's true.
Welsh: Mae'n rhaid i CDLl fod yn gyfredol. Yr anhawster o redeg awdurdod lleol yw os oes gan unrhyw awdurdod lleol gynllun datblygu lle nad yw'r cyflenwad tai pum mlynedd yn berthnasol mwyach, maen nhw mewn perygl o ddatblygiadau tai hapfasnachol, ac mae'n bwysig dros ben bod cynllun datblygu ar waith. Ond mae'n gwneud ei bwynt yn dda. Mae'n bwysig dros ben bod cydbwysedd priodol rhwng tai a bod tai ar gael yn ôl yr hyn y gall pobl ei fforddio. Dyna pam, wrth gwrs, y gall awdurdodau lleol gadw'r arian ac adeiladu tai cyngor newydd, yn dilyn diddymiad llwyddiannus y system cymhorthdal cyfrifon refeniw tai, fel y gall awdurdodau lleol adeiladu tai cyngor unwaith eto. Mae gennym ni'r grant tai fforddiadwy, wrth gwrs, sydd â'r nod o helpu pobl i gael llety sy'n fforddiadwy iddyn nhw, ac, wrth gwrs, mae gwneud yn siŵr nad yw pobl yn dod yn ddigartref yn y lle cyntaf - mae Cefnogi Pobl yn enghraifft o hynny. Mae'n rhaid i ni wneud yn siŵr - ac rydym ni wedi bod yn llwyddiannus wrth wneud hynny - nad yw pobl yn dod yn ddigartref mewn gwirionedd. Ond mae'n iawn y dylai awdurdodau lleol fod yn ymwybodol, wrth iddyn nhw ddatblygu eu cynlluniau datblygu, o'r angen i sicrhau'r cydbwysedd cywir o dai; ni allant oll fod yn dai ar un pen y farchnad yn unig - mae hynny'n wir.
English: For 2017-18, we've allocated £592,102 to local authorities to deliver cycle training to approximately 15,000 people. We'll also be working with the Department for Transport to review the national standards for cycle training over the next few months.
Welsh: Ar gyfer 2017-18, rydym ni wedi dyrannu £592,102 i awdurdodau lleol ddarparu hyfforddiant beicio i oddeutu 15,000 o bobl. Byddwn hefyd yn gweithio gyda'r Adran Drafnidiaeth i adolygu'r safonau cenedlaethol ar gyfer hyfforddiant beicio dros y misoedd nesaf.
English: First Minister, it's Road Safety Week this week, and I think we would commend all measures to road safety. We also, in South Wales Central, unfortunately, have to reflect on two fatal accidents in October, and we send our condolences to the families of the victims. I just wonder if it is now time for a much more integrated and ambitious approach to these matters, along the lines we see in the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark, where you have 20 mph zones in urban areas in much greater use, clearer designation of off-road and on-road bicycle paths and priority traffic signals in key places. We really need to have a joined-up approach to this important matter.
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, mae hi'n wythnos Diogelwch ar y Ffyrdd yr wythnos hon, ac rwy'n credu y byddem ni i gyd yn cymeradwyo'r holl fesurau ar gyfer diogelwch ar y ffyrdd. Hefyd, yng Nghanol De Cymru, yn anffodus, mae'n rhaid i ni fyfyrio ar ddwy ddamwain angheuol ym mis Hydref, ac rydym ni'n anfon ein cydymdeimlad at deuluoedd y dioddefwyr. Rwy'n meddwl tybed a yw'n bryd nawr i gael dull llawer mwy integredig ac uchelgeisiol o ymdrin â'r materion hyn, yn debyg i'r hyn a welwn yn yr Iseldiroedd, yr Almaen a Denmarc, lle y gwneir llawer mwy o ddefnydd o barthau 20 mya mewn ardaloedd trefol, yn ogystal â dynodiad mwy eglur o lwybrau beicio oddi ar y ffordd ac ar y ffordd, a signalau traffig blaenoriaethol mewn mannau allweddol. Mae gwir angen i ni gael dull cydgysylltiedig o ymdrin â'r mater pwysig hwn.
English: I agree. One of the incidents he refers to happened not very long before I was travelling along the same road, at the same time, but I didn't see it. It's right to say that great care needs to be taken when cyclists and cars use the same road. It's important that cars, of course, which have a primary responsibility, to my mind, consider the safety of cyclists, and that is something, of course, for all drivers. That said - and I've said this before in the Chamber - I think it is important that if we're going to encourage more people to cycle, there will always be people who are too nervous to cycle in traffic. There are some who are not, but others will say, 'Well, I would like to cycle more, but I'm not keen on mixing with cars on the road.' That's why it's important, of course, to provide dedicated cycle lanes. How do we do that? We have the Active Travel (Wales) Act 2013, of course, and the Cabinet Secretary does fund active travel infrastructure through his own schemes and by making funding available to local authorities. The active travel design guidance provides clear standards that infrastructure must meet, and this winter we will be updating the guidance to incorporate emerging best practice. I understand that the Cabinet Secretary will be making an announcement soon on the funding call on the local transport fund for the coming financial year.
Welsh: Rwy'n cytuno. Digwyddodd un o'r digwyddiadau y mae'n cyfeirio atynt nid yn hir iawn cyn i mi deithio ar hyd yr un ffordd, ar yr un pryd, ond ni wnes i ei weld. Mae'n iawn i ddweud bod angen cymryd gofal mawr pan fo beicwyr a cheir yn defnyddio'r un ffordd. Mae'n bwysig bod ceir, wrth gwrs, sydd â'r prif gyfrifoldeb, yn fy marn i, yn ystyried diogelwch beicwyr, ac mae hynny'n rhywbeth, wrth gwrs, i bob gyrrwr. Wedi dweud hynny - ac rwyf i wedi dweud hyn o'r blaen yn y Siambr - rwy'n meddwl ei bod hi'n bwysig os ydym ni'n mynd i annog mwy o bobl i feicio, y bydd bob amser pobl sy'n rhy nerfus i feicio mewn traffig. Bydd rhai nad ydynt, ond bydd eraill yn dweud, 'Wel, hoffwn i feicio mwy, ond nid wyf yn awyddus i gymysgu gyda cheir ar y ffyrdd.' Dyna pam mae'n bwysig, wrth gwrs, darparu lonydd beicio pwrpasol. Sut ydym ni'n gwneud hynny? Mae gennym ni Ddeddf Teithio Llesol (Cymru) 2013, wrth gwrs, ac mae Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn ariannu seilwaith teithio llesol trwy gynlluniau ei hun a thrwy roi arian ar gael i awdurdodau lleol. Mae'r canllawiau dylunio teithio llesol yn darparu safonau eglur y mae'n rhaid i seilwaith eu bodloni, a byddwn yn diweddaru'r canllawiau y gaeaf hwn i ymgorffori arferion gorau sy'n dod i'r amlwg. Rwy'n deall y bydd Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn gwneud cyhoeddiad cyn bo hir ar yr alwad ariannu ar y gronfa trafnidiaeth leol ar gyfer y flwyddyn ariannol i ddod.
English: I'm delighted to hear that you've mentioned the exemplary design guidance that the Welsh Government issued along with the Active Travel (Wales) Act 2013, because obviously it's been lauded by the Westminster Government as fit for purpose across Britain. And so we've got this excellent design guidance, but what monitoring has the Welsh Government done of how much attention local authorities are paying to the design guidance when they're delivering the active travel plans that they need to deliver in order to address some of the issues that David Melding's raised around combatting the levels of accidents that happen, particularly at junctions?
Welsh: Rwy'n falch iawn o glywed eich bod chi wedi sôn am y canllawiau dylunio rhagorol a gyhoeddwyd gan Lywodraeth Cymru ynghyd â Deddf Teithio Llesol (Cymru) 2013, oherwydd yn amlwg mae wedi cael clod gan Lywodraeth San Steffan fel rhywbeth sy'n addas i'w ddiben ledled Prydain. Ac felly, mae gennym ni'r canllawiau dylunio rhagorol hyn, ond pa waith monitro mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ei wneud o faint o sylw y mae awdurdodau lleol yn ei roi i'r canllawiau dylunio pan fyddant yn darparu'r cynlluniau teithio llesol y mae angen iddynt eu darparu i fynd i'r afael â rhai o'r materion a godwyd gan David Melding o ran brwydro lefelau'r damweiniau sy'n digwydd, yn enwedig ar gyffyrdd?
English: Well, local authorities must comply with the law, of course. But as part of the updating of the guidance that will take place, then as part of that guidance we'll have cognisance of what has been happening around Wales in order for the guidance to be strengthened, if it is the case that there are problems in some parts of Wales. The Member is absolutely right to say that we have the Act in place, but it is hugely important that the Act is observed, and there's still a great deal of scope in many of our city and town centres to do more when it comes to cycle lanes particularly, and that is something that we will be considering as part of the updating of the guidance.
Welsh: Wel, mae'n rhaid i awdurdodau lleol gydymffurfio â'r gyfraith, wrth gwrs. Ond yn rhan o'r gwaith diweddaru canllawiau a fydd yn digwydd, yna yn rhan o'r canllawiau hynny byddwn yn rhoi sylw i'r hyn sydd wedi bod yn digwydd ledled Cymru fel y gellir cryfhau'r canllawiau, os yw'n wir fod problemau mewn rhai rhannau o Gymru. Mae'r Aelod yn hollol gywir i ddweud bod gennym ni'r Ddeddf ar waith, ond mae'n bwysig dros ben bod y Ddeddf yn cael ei hufuddhau, ac mae llawer iawn o gwmpas o hyd yng nghanol llawer o'n dinasoedd a'n trefi i wneud mwy pan ddaw i lonydd beicio yn arbennig, ac mae hynny'n rhywbeth y byddwn ni'n ei ystyried yn rhan o ddiweddaru'r canllawiau.
English: There are issues of cyclist safety, as have been raised by the last two Members, and we do need to make steps to encourage safe cycling. Unfortunately, when cyclists come off the road and onto the pavement, they can also become a danger to pedestrians. In Peterborough, the council are currently issuing PSPO notices, which are public space protection orders, to stop dangerous cyclists. One thousand cyclists have been fined in three months. We do have powers to issue PSPOs in Wales as well, so should we encourage Welsh councils to use similar notices to tackle the growing problem of dangerous cycling?
Welsh: Ceir materion o ran diogelwch beicwyr, fel y codwyd gan y ddau Aelod diwethaf, ac mae angen i ni gymryd camau i annog pobl i feicio'n ddiogel. Yn anffodus, pan ddaw beicwyr oddi ar y ffordd ac ar y palmant, gallant hefyd ddod yn beryglus i gerddwyr. Yn Peterborough, mae'r cyngor wrthi'n cyflwyno hysbysiadau GGMC, sef gorchmynion gwarchod mannau cyhoeddus, i atal beicwyr peryglus. Mae mil o feicwyr wedi cael dirwy mewn tri mis. Mae gennym ni bwerau i gyflwyno GGMC yng Nghymru hefyd, felly a ddylem ni annog cynghorau Cymru i ddefnyddio hysbysiadau tebyg i fynd i'r afael â'r broblem gynyddol o feicio peryglus?
English: Well, this is something I know that the UK Government is considering. The current law that deals with dangerous cycling is a law that dates back to the furious driving of horses and carts in Victorian times, which has not been updated, although a prosecution was successful, of course, along those lines. I do get concerned. I think, first of all, it's important for us to understand that, just like most drivers, most cyclists are responsible cyclists, who are well-illuminated as well at night. But I've seen cyclists on pavements, I've seen people cycling at night with no lights and they're invisible, frankly. There's literally nothing on them that'll identify them to cars. But they are a minority. So, I think what is hugely important is that we continue to emphasise that for cyclists' own safety, it's massively important that they have lights on at night, they don't wear entirely dark clothing so they can't be seen, for their own safety and of course to enable cars to see them. But we are talking about a small minority of people. There is a duty on car drivers, obviously, to consider the safety of cyclists, but it is important as well that cyclists take steps to ensure that they can be seen.
Welsh: Wel, mae hyn yn rhywbeth y gwn fod Llywodraeth y DU yn ei ystyried. Mae'r gyfraith gyfredol sy'n ymdrin â beicio peryglus yn gyfraith sy'n dyddio'n ôl i yrru ceffyl a chart yn wyllt yn oes Fictoria, nad yw wedi cael ei diweddaru, er y bu erlyniad yn llwyddiannus, wrth gwrs, ar y sail honno. Mae'n peri pryder i mi. Rwy'n credu, yn gyntaf oll, ei bod hi'n bwysig i ni ddeall, yn union fel y rhan fwyaf o yrwyr, bod y rhan fwyaf o feicwyr yn feicwyr cyfrifol, sydd wedi'u goleuo'n dda yn ystod y nos hefyd. Ond rwyf wedi gweld beicwyr ar balmentydd, rwyf wedi gweld pobl yn beicio yn y nos heb oleuadau ac maen nhw'n anweledig, a dweud y gwir. Nid oes unrhyw beth arnynt yn llythrennol a fydd yn eu harddangos i geir. Ond lleiafrif yw'r rhain. Felly, rwy'n credu mai'r hyn sy'n hynod bwysig yw ein bod ni'n parhau i bwysleisio, ar gyfer diogelwch beicwyr eu hunain, ei bod yn eithriadol o bwysig bod ganddyn nhw oleuadau yn y nos, nad ydyn nhw'n gwisgo dillad cwbl dywyll fel na ellir eu gweld, ar gyfer eu diogelwch eu hunain ac i alluogi ceir i'w gweld nhw, wrth gwrs. Ond rydym ni'n sôn am leiafrif bach o bobl. Ceir dyletswydd ar yrwyr ceir, yn amlwg, i ystyried diogelwch beicwyr, ond mae'n bwysig hefyd bod beicwyr yn cymryd camau i sicrhau bod modd eu gweld.
English: 'Prosperity for All' sets out our commitment to strong and safe communities that protect and support the vulnerable. What we look to do, of course, is to tackle inequality and support vulnerable people, and our draft budget, I believe, demonstrates that very commitment.
Welsh: Mae 'Ffyniant i Bawb' yn nodi ein hymrwymiad i gymunedau cryf a diogel sy'n diogelu ac yn cynorthwyo pobl agored i niwed. Yr hyn yr ydym ni'n ceisio ei wneud, wrth gwrs, yw mynd i'r afael ag anghydraddoldeb a chynorthwyo pobl agored i niwed, ac mae ein cyllideb ddrafft, rwy'n credu, yn dangos yr union ymrwymiad hwnnw.
English: Well, thank you. Housing-related support funded through the Supporting People programme and delivered through housing associations and third sector bodies has been improving lives and saving significant sums for statutory sector providers - health boards, local authorities - for many years. In your deal on the draft budget with Plaid Cymru, you agreed that you would ring-fence Supporting People funding for two years - the £124 million. But a letter to local authority chief executives on 24 October revealed that seven local authorities would be given 100 per cent spending flexibility, and the other 15, 15 per cent spending flexibility, across Supporting People and four other non-housing related grants. How do you respond, therefore, to concern that this effectively removes the ring fence in 2018-19, meaning that Supporting People funding is not guaranteed to be protected at 2017-18 levels, and that the lack of a distinct budget line for Supporting People gives no assurances that the funding will be protected to £124 million in 2019-20?
Welsh: Wel, diolch. Mae cymorth cysylltiedig â thai a ariennir drwy'r rhaglen Cefnogi Pobl ac a ddarperir trwy gymdeithasau tai a chyrff trydydd sector wedi bod yn gwella bywydau ac yn arbed symiau sylweddol i ddarparwyr sector statudol - byrddau iechyd, awdurdodau lleol - ers blynyddoedd lawer. Yn eich cytundeb ar y gyllideb ddrafft gyda Phlaid Cymru, cytunwyd gennych y byddech chi'n neilltuo cyllid Cefnogi Pobl am ddwy flynedd - £124 miliwn. Ond datgelodd llythyr at brif weithredwyr awdurdodau lleol ar 24 Hydref y byddai saith awdurdod lleol yn cael hyblygrwydd gwariant 100 y cant, a'r 15 arall yn cael hyblygrwydd gwariant 15 y cant, ar draws Cefnogi Pobl a phedwar grant arall nad ydynt yn gysylltiedig â thai. Sut ydych chi'n ymateb, felly, i bryder bod hyn yn cael gwared ar y neilltuo yn 2018-19 i bob pwrpas, sy'n golygu nad oes sicrwydd bod cyllid Cefnogi Pobl wedi ei ddiogelu ar lefelau 2017-18, a bod y diffyg llinell gyllideb bendant ar gyfer Cefnogi Pobl yn rhoi dim sicrwydd y bydd y cyllid yn cael ei ddiogelu i £124 miliwn yn 2019-20?
English: Well, we expect local authorities, of course, to comply with the law, and in the Housing (Wales) Act 2014, it is clear that local authorities have a duty to prevent homelessness. By and large, they have performed well in implementing that legislation. Progress has not been as consistent as we would like, and of course we will continue to monitor progress to make sure that the good progress that has been made across Wales continues in the future, due to the fact that Supporting People, of course, has received the funding through the budget agreement that is necessary.
Welsh: Wel, rydym ni'n disgwyl i awdurdodau lleol, wrth gwrs, gydymffurfio â'r gyfraith, ac yn Neddf Tai (Cymru) 2014, mae'n eglur bod gan awdurdodau lleol ddyletswydd i atal digartrefedd. Ar y cyfan, maen nhw wedi perfformio'n dda o ran gweithredu'r ddeddfwriaeth honno. Nid yw cynnydd wedi bod mor gyson ag yr hoffem, ac wrth gwrs byddwn yn parhau i fonitro cynnydd i wneud yn siŵr bod y cynnydd da a wnaed ledled Cymru yn parhau yn y dyfodol, oherwydd wrth gwrs, bod Cefnogi Pobl wedi cael y cyllid drwy'r cytundeb cyllideb sy'n angenrheidiol.
English: Can I also support the importance of preventative services, but across all of our public services? For example, in Cwm Taf Local Health Board, they've been piloting free health checks funded by Welsh Government for the over-50s and, as a result, are picking up early signals of health problems that allows for cost-effective, preventative actions. Would the First Minister agree that this type of early prevention work is vital to reforming our health and wider public services, as well as ensuring the most effective use of public funds?
Welsh: A gaf innau hefyd gefnogi pwysigrwydd gwasanaethau ataliol, ond ar draws ein holl wasanaethau cyhoeddus? Er enghraifft, ym Mwrdd Iechyd Lleol Cwm Taf, maen nhw wedi bod yn treialu archwiliadau iechyd am ddim wedi eu hariannu gan Lywodraeth Cymru i'r rhai sydd dros 50 oed, ac o ganlyniad, yn canfod arwyddion cynnar o broblemau iechyd sy'n caniatáu camau gweithredu ataliol, cost-effeithiol. A yw'r Prif Weinidog yn cytuno bod y math hwn o waith atal cynnar yn hanfodol i ddiwygio ein gwasanaethau iechyd a chyhoeddus ehangach, yn ogystal â sicrhau'r defnydd mwyaf effeithiol o arian cyhoeddus?