English: Well, maybe it does happen, but I believe that it does exclude applicants who, at the time of making their application or considering making an application, don't have that particular qualification that they may need to undertake that post. And there are a number of examples - to respond to your point - where organisations have advertised posts, and after discussion in an interview, candidates have committed to improve their fluency or to become entirely fluent in two or more languages, and that has ensured that there are very able individuals appointed to public positions that would not have applied if they had been excluded by a linguistic condition beforehand. It's a matter of having an appropriate matrix for human resources - that's what this is, and I'm afraid that there are some institutions that haven't developed their policies in terms of public appointments in a way that takes full advantage of the advice available in a place such as this, for example. Now, I'm not going to speak about issues related to the Assembly Commission, but this is a bilingual institution through statute, which was established 10 years ago. The conditions of public appointments are dealt with in a very careful way so that there are qualifications available for certain posts that don't say that the head of any organisation should necessarily have the same level of fluency as would be required in delivering certain services. So, we need to create a system of constructive bilingualism, and exclusion for a particular post isn't what that should look like, in my view. And therefore I expressed that view, and Jason will say a little more.
Welsh: Wel, efallai ei fod o yn digwydd, ond dwi'n credu ei fod o'n allgáu ymgeiswyr sydd, ar y pryd y bydden nhw'n gwneud eu cais neu yn ystyried gwneud cais, ddim â'r cymhwyster y bydden nhw ei angen, o bosib, i wneud y swydd. Ac mae yna nifer o enghreifftiau - i ateb y pwynt yna - lle mae cyrff wedi hysbysebu, ac wedi trafodaeth mewn cyfweliad, mae ymgeiswyr wedi ymrwymo i fod yn fwy rhugl neu yn gwbl rugl mewn dwy neu fwy o ieithoedd, ac mae hynny wedi sicrhau bod yna bersonau abl iawn wedi cael eu penodi i swyddi cyhoeddus na fyddai ddim wedi ymgeisio pe byddai yna allgáu drwy amod ieithyddol wedi digwydd ymlaen llaw. Mater o gael matrics priodol ar gyfer adnoddau dynol ydy hyn ac mae gen i ofn bod yna rhai sefydliadau nad ydyn nhw ddim wedi datblygu eu polisïau penodi cyhoeddus mewn ffordd sydd yn manteisio ar y cyngor safonol sydd ar gael mewn lle fel hwn, er enghraifft. Dŷn ni - . Dyw e ddim i fi siarad am faterion yn ymwneud â Chomisiwn y Cynulliad, ond mae hwn yn sefydliad sydd yn ddwyieithog drwy Ddeddf gwlad wnaethom ni ei sefydlu 20 mlynedd - wel, 10 mlynedd yn ôl. Ac mae amodau penodiadau cyhoeddus yn y fan yma yn cael eu delio â nhw mewn ffordd ofalus fel bod yna gymwysterau ar gael i swyddi sydd ddim yn cynnwys dweud y dylai pennaeth unrhyw sefydliad o angenrheidrwydd fod â'r un rhugledd ag sydd ei angen i ddelifro gwasanaethau. Mae eisiau creu system o ddefnyddio dwyieithrwydd yn adeiladol, ac nid allgau ar gyfer un penodiad ydy hynny, yn fy marn i. Ac felly fe wnes i fynegi'r farn honno. Gwnaiff Jason ddweud mwy.