techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: To present a slightly contrary view, Llywydd, in evidence to the Economy, Infrastructure and Skills Committee last week, the Wales Tourism Alliance said that whilst the focus will need to remain on major international events, they only tend to benefit a small number of locations, particularly Cardiff. The chief executive of the European Tourism Operators Alliance agreed and said there were lots of reasons for having a party, but economic benefit for the tourism industry is not necessarily one of them. What is the First Minister's view and how can the Government take steps to ensure that large-scale international events don't harm the Welsh tourism industry?
Welsh: I gyflwyno safbwynt ychydig yn groes, Llywydd, mewn tystiolaeth i Bwyllgor yr Economi, Seilwaith a Sgiliau yr wythnos diwethaf, dywedodd Cynghrair Twristiaeth Cymru, er y bydd angen i'r pwyslais barhau ar ddigwyddiadau rhyngwladol mawr, maen nhw'n tueddu i fod ddim ond o fantais i nifer fach o leoliadau, a Chaerdydd yn benodol. Cytunodd prif weithredwr Cynghrair Gweithredwyr Twristiaeth Ewrop a dywedodd fod llawer o resymau i gael parti, ond nad yw budd economaidd i'r diwydiant twristiaeth o reidrwydd yn un ohonynt. Beth yw barn y Prif Weinidog a sut all y Llywodraeth gymryd camau i sicrhau nad yw digwyddiadau rhyngwladol ar raddfa fawr yn niweidio diwydiant twristiaeth Cymru?
English: We can have both. One of the issues that we face with large-scale events is we have to ensure that people have places to stay outside Wales. The reality is the capacity isn't there entirely in Wales to host people as they come to Wales. That will develop over time. It isn't the case that it's either spending money on major events or spending money on the rest of Wales. For example, we've supported tourism initiatives around Wales. We look at initiatives such as Surf Snowdonia in the north and the support we give to rural businesses around Wales. In some ways, a major event provides an immediate economic impact, but also, of course, it acts as a catalyst for developing interest in Wales and, therefore, for tourism around the whole of Wales. So, the immediate impact, it's true to say, is more localised, but the longer term impact, in my view, is much broader, and that's of course the way we'd want it to be.
Welsh: Gallwn ni gael y ddau. Un o'r problemau yr ydym ni'n eu hwynebu gyda digwyddiadau ar raddfa fawr yw bod yn rhaid i ni sicrhau bod gan bobl leoedd i aros y tu allan i Gymru. Y gwir amdani yw nad yw'r capasiti yno'n gyfan gwbl yng Nghymru i ddarparu llety i bobl wrth iddynt ddod i Gymru. Bydd hynny'n datblygu dros amser. Nid yw'n wir ei fod yn gwestiwn o wario arian ar ddigwyddiadau mawr neu wario arian ar weddill Cymru. Er enghraifft, rydym ni wedi cefnogi mentrau twristiaeth ledled Cymru. Rydym ni'n edrych ar fentrau fel Surf Snowdonia yn y gogledd a'r gefnogaeth yr ydym ni'n ei rhoi i fusnesau gwledig ledled Cymru. Mewn rhai ffyrdd, mae digwyddiad mawr yn cynnig effaith economaidd ar unwaith, ond hefyd, wrth gwrs, mae'n gweithredu fel sbardun ar gyfer datblygu diddordeb yng Nghymru ac, felly, ar gyfer twristiaeth ledled Cymru gyfan. Felly, mae'r effaith uniongyrchol, mae'n wir i ddweud, yn fwy lleol, ond mae'r effaith tymor hwy, yn fy marn i, yn llawer ehangach, a dyna'r ffordd y byddem ni eisiau iddi fod, wrth gwrs.
English: I call now on party leaders to question the First Minister. The leader of the opposition, Andrew R.T. Davies.
Welsh: Galwaf nawr ar arweinwyr y pleidiau i holi'r Prif Weinidog. Arweinydd yr wrthblaid, Andrew R.T. Davies.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. First Minister, last week, the Welsh Government presented its waiting list figures for the Welsh NHS, and the figures showed that, in Wales, one in seven people is on a waiting list, or 450,000 people. In England, that figure is one in 14. There are pressures across the United Kingdom when it comes to NHS services, and everyone acknowledges that. As we go into the busy winter months, and with the financial pressures that are on the Welsh NHS, with four of the seven health boards projecting a deficit in excess of £30 million, what help is your Government giving to health boards to address the spiralling numbers that are waiting on waiting lists here in Wales and, above all, the financial predicament that many LHBs face?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, yr wythnos diwethaf, cyflwynodd Llywodraeth Cymru ei ffigurau rhestr aros ar gyfer GIG Cymru, ac roedd y ffigurau'n dangos bod un o bob saith o bobl, neu 450,000 o bobl, ar restr aros yng Nghymru. Un o bob 14 yw'r ffigur hwnnw yn Lloegr. Ceir pwysau ar draws y Deyrnas Unedig pan ddaw i wasanaethau'r GIG, ac mae pawb yn cydnabod hynny. Wrth i ni gyrraedd misoedd prysur y gaeaf, a chyda'r pwysau ariannol sydd ar GIG Cymru, gyda phedwar o'r saith bwrdd iechyd yn rhagweld diffyg o fwy na £30 miliwn, pa gymorth mae eich Llywodraeth yn ei roi i fyrddau iechyd i fynd i'r afael â'r niferoedd sy'n cynyddu'n gyflym sy'n aros ar restrau aros yma yng Nghymru ac, yn anad dim, y benbleth ariannol y mae llawer o BILlau yn ei hwynebu?
English: Well, first of all, I don't accept the premise that the question is based on. If we look, for example, at referral-to-treatment times over 36 weeks, that's improved by 35 per cent between March 2015 and March 2017. March 2017 was also the highest performance on the percentage of patients waiting over 26 weeks since March 2014. We know that diagnostic waiting times have improved by 58 per cent by March of this year. I don't accept that somehow the situation is worse in every case in terms of Wales compared to England. He's right to say that all health services face pressures. He asks a fair question, which is: what preparations have been made for the winter? Every year, we make preparations for the winter. The pressures do come on. We're not immune to the same pressures, as other countries in the UK, but we know that, over the past few years, the plans that we have made have been robust enough to deal with the pressures that come on during the winter, and I'm confident that we are in that same position again.
Welsh: Wel, yn gyntaf oll, nid wyf yn derbyn y rhagdybiaeth y mae'r cwestiwn yn seiliedig arni. Os edrychwn ni, er enghraifft, ar amseroedd atgyfeirio-i-driniaeth dros 36 wythnos, mae hynny wedi gwella 35 y cant rhwng Mawrth 2015 a Mawrth 2017. Mawrth 2017 oedd y perfformiad uchaf hefyd o ran canran y cleifion a oedd yn aros dros 26 wythnos ers Mawrth 2014. Gwyddom fod amseroedd aros diagnostig wedi gwella 58 y cant erbyn mis Mawrth eleni. Nid wyf yn derbyn bod y sefyllfa rywsut yn waeth ym mhob achos o ran Cymru o'i chymharu â Lloegr. Mae'n iawn i ddweud bod yr holl wasanaethau iechyd yn wynebu pwysau. Mae'n gofyn cwestiwn teg, sef: pa baratoadau sydd wedi eu gwneud ar gyfer y gaeaf? Bob blwyddyn, rydym ni'n gwneud paratoadau ar gyfer y gaeaf. Mae'r pwysau'n digwydd. Nid ydym yn ddiogel rhag yr un pwysau, fel gwledydd eraill yn y DU, ond gwyddom, dros y blynyddoedd diwethaf, fod y cynlluniau yr ydym ni wedi eu gwneud wedi bod yn ddigon cadarn i ymdrin â'r pwysau a ddaw yn ystod y gaeaf, ac rwy'n hyderus ein bod ni yn yr un sefyllfa honno eto.
English: You're quite right, First Minister; you and I could trade statistics, and the gallery upstairs and those watching on TV would just get bamboozled by those statistics, but the figures do show that, in Wales, for example, there's been a 400 per cent increase in people waiting 12 months or more for a surgical procedure. In the best health board, Cwm Taf Local Health Board, no-one waits 12 months or more. In the worst, or one of the worst, Betsi Cadwaladr University Local Health Board, which is under the direct control of your Government, there's been a 1,250 per cent increase in people waiting 12 months or more. So, it is the role of Government to make sure that good practice is spread out in the NHS here in Wales. So, why is someone in Betsi waiting so much longer for a procedure than someone in Cwm Taf? We only have seven health boards; surely, that good practice should be spilling out into all the health boards so that people do not see these spiralling waiting times here in Wales.
Welsh: Rydych chi'n gwbl gywir, Prif Weinidog; gallech chi a minnau gyfnewid ystadegau, a byddai'r oriel i fyny'r grisiau a'r rheini sy'n gwylio ar y teledu yn cael eu drysu'n llwyr gan yr ystadegau hynny, ond mae'r ffigurau'n dangos, yng Nghymru, er enghraifft, y bu cynnydd o 400 y cant i nifer y bobl sy'n aros 12 mis neu fwy am driniaeth lawfeddygol. Yn y bwrdd iechyd gorau, Bwrdd Iechyd Lleol Cwm Taf, nid oes neb yn aros 12 mis neu fwy. Yn y gwaethaf, neu un o'r gwaethaf, Bwrdd Iechyd Lleol Prifysgol Betsi Cadwaladr, sydd dan reolaeth uniongyrchol eich Llywodraeth chi, bu cynnydd o 1,250 y cant i'r bobl sy'n aros 12 mis neu fwy. Felly, cyfrifoldeb y Llywodraeth yw sicrhau bod arferion da yn cael eu lledaenu yn y GIG yma yng Nghymru. Felly, pam mae rhywun yn Betsi yn aros cymaint yn hwy am lawdriniaeth na rhywun yng Nghwm Taf? Dim ond saith bwrdd iechyd sydd gennym ni; does bosib na ddylai'r arfer da hwnnw fod yn lledaenu i bob bwrdd iechyd fel nad yw pobl yn gweld yr amseroedd aros cynyddol hyn yng Nghymru.
English: Well, what I can say is we recently announced £50 million of performance moneys in order to continue - we are now trading statistics again, but I think we have to - in order to continue this improvement trend for waiting times. The health Secretary and I have been very clear on the need for further improvement in waiting times, and all health boards have committed to further improvements by the end of March 2018. There are plans in place for all organisations and monitoring arrangements to be in place to ensure the improvement is delivered, building on the progress over the last two years. Yes, there are inconsistencies. Yes, we want to make sure those inconsistencies are dealt with, which is why we've allocated this money and why, of course, health boards have made the commitment that they have.
Welsh: Wel, yr hyn y gallaf ei ddweud yw ein bod ni wedi cyhoeddi £50 miliwn o arian perfformiad yn ddiweddar er mwyn parhau - rydym ni'n cyfnewid ystadegau eto nawr, ond rwy'n credu bod yn rhaid i ni - er mwyn parhau'r duedd hon o wella o ran amseroedd aros. Mae'r Ysgrifennydd dros Iechyd a minnau wedi bod yn eglur iawn ynghylch yr angen am welliant pellach i'r amseroedd aros, ac mae'r holl fyrddau iechyd wedi ymrwymo i welliannau pellach erbyn diwedd mis Mawrth 2018. Mae cynlluniau wedi'u sefydlu i'r holl sefydliadau a threfniadau monitro fod ar waith i sicrhau y darperir y gwelliant, gan adeiladu ar y cynnydd dros y ddwy flynedd ddiwethaf. Oes, mae anghysondebau. Ydym, rydym ni eisiau sicrhau bod yr anghysondebau hynny yn cael sylw, a dyna pam yr ydym ni wedi dyrannu'r arian hwn a pham, wrth gwrs, y mae'r byrddau iechyd wedi gwneud yr ymrwymiad y maen nhw wedi ei wneud.
English: I agree with you, First Minister; the NHS is about acronyms and, obviously, statistics. But, very often, we miss the actual patients who are waiting on the clinicians who are under pressure, and they just want a straight answer. When you do have so many health boards in Wales, as I said, four of them - . And it's worth repeating the deficits or the projected deficits that they do have, such as Hywel Dda Local Health Board, £49 million, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board, £35 million, Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board, £31 million. A lot of people will say, 'How can you manage those deficits whilst controlling and driving down the waiting times?' Are you confident that, by the time we get to March, waiting times will be declining and the deficits will be in hand and wiped out, as the health Secretary has indicated? Or will you have to bail out the health boards that have these projected deficits?
Welsh: Rwy'n cytuno â chi, Prif Weinidog; mae'r GIG yn ymwneud ag acronymau ac, yn amlwg, ystadegau. Ond, yn aml iawn, rydym ni'n methu'r cleifion gwirioneddol sy'n aros am y clinigwyr sydd dan bwysau, a'r cwbl maen nhw ei eisiau yw ateb plaen. Pan fo gennych chi gymaint o fyrddau iechyd yng Nghymru, fel y dywedais, mae pedwar ohonynt - . Ac mae'n werth ailadrodd y diffygion neu'r diffygion rhagamcanol sydd ganddyn nhw, fel Bwrdd Iechyd Lleol Hywel Dda, £49 miliwn, Bwrdd Iechyd Lleol Prifysgol Abertawe Bro Morgannwg, £35 miliwn, Bwrdd Iechyd Lleol Prifysgol Caerdydd a'r Fro, £31 miliwn. Bydd llawer o bobl yn dweud, 'Sut gallwch chi reoli'r diffygion hynny tra eich bod yn rheoli a lleihau'r amseroedd aros?' A ydych chi'n hyderus, erbyn i ni gyrraedd mis Mawrth, y bydd amseroedd aros yn lleihau ac y bydd y diffygion dan reolaeth ac yn cael eu dileu, fel y mae'r Ysgrifennydd dros Iechyd wedi ei nodi? Neu a fydd yn rhaid i chi roi arian cynorthwyol i'r byrddau iechyd sydd â'r diffygion rhagamcanol hyn?
English: No, we expect health boards to be able to manage with the resources that they have. Clearly, we could not be in a position where health boards knew that whatever they spent, they would be bailed out. That is an incentive for them not to be as rigorous in their financial management and their care for patients as they otherwise should be. So, they have been told that, by March of next year, we expect to see these improvements. If not, of course, they will need to explain why that is and explain why they have failed to meet the promises that they have given both to the Government and to the people of Wales.
Welsh: Na, rydym ni'n disgwyl i fyrddau iechyd allu ymdopi â'r adnoddau sydd ganddynt. Yn amlwg, ni allem fod mewn sefyllfa lle'r oedd byrddau iechyd yn gwybod y byddent yn cael arian cynorthwyol faint bynnag y maen nhw'n ei wario. Mae hynny'n gymhelliant iddyn nhw beidio â bod mor drylwyr yn eu rheolaeth ariannol a'u gofal am gleifion ag y dylent fod fel arall. Felly, dywedwyd wrthynt, erbyn mis Mawrth y flwyddyn nesaf, ein bod ni'n disgwyl gweld y gwelliannau hyn. Os na fyddwn yn eu gweld, wrth gwrs, bydd angen iddyn nhw esbonio pam mae hynny'n bod ac esbonio pam maen nhw wedi methu â chyflawni'r addewidion y maen nhw wedi eu gwneud i'r Llywodraeth ac i bobl Cymru.
English: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. Just before we rose for the summer recess, the Government pulled the rug out from underneath the Circuit of Wales project, which would have brought hundreds of millions of pounds of much-needed private investment into the northern Valleys. As a fig leaf, the First Minister and his Government then proposed that they should invest £100 million of public money in a speculative scheme to create a new industrial park in the Ebbw Vale area. Given that the Ebbw Vale enterprise zone has been in operation now for quite a number of years, and tens of millions of pounds have already been invested in jobs in that area, but only 320 new jobs have been created and 70 safeguarded, why does the First Minister think that his speculative proposal is going to be any more successful?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. Cyn i ni godi ar gyfer toriad yr haf, tynnodd y Llywodraeth ei chefnogaeth i brosiect Cylchffordd Cymru yn ôl, a fyddai wedi dod â channoedd o filiynau o bunnoedd o fuddsoddiad preifat y mae wir ei angen i'r Cymoedd gogleddol. I geisio gwneud iawn am hyn, cynigiodd y Prif Weinidog a'i Lywodraeth wedyn y dylent fuddsoddi £100 miliwn o arian cyhoeddus mewn cynllun hapfasnachol i greu parc diwydiannol newydd yn ardal Glynebwy. O gofio bod ardal fenter Glynebwy wedi bod yn weithredol nawr ers cryn dipyn o flynyddoedd, a bod degau o filiynau o bunnoedd eisoes wedi eu buddsoddi mewn swyddi yn yr ardal honno, ond dim ond 320 o swyddi newydd wedi eu creu a 70 wedi eu diogelu, pam mae'r Prif Weinidog yn meddwl bod ei gynnig hapfasnachol yn mynd i fod yn fwy llwyddiannus?
English: I talk to businesses, and one of the issues particularly that businesses have flagged up with us is the lack of suitable premises where they can go in order to set up manufacturing. One of the issues that we're looking at is being able to provide them with the premises that they need, of the right size. We don't do that in terms of building empty buildings for no reason. We've done that by consulting with businesses, and asking businesses what they want. That's actually a very sound way of investing for the future rather than, as he calls it, being speculative. It's far from speculative. This is based on the feedback that we're getting from business.
Welsh: Rwy'n siarad â busnesau, ac un o'r materion yn benodol y mae busnesau wedi tynnu ein sylw ato yw'r diffyg adeiladau addas lle y gallant fynd er mwyn dechrau gweithgynhyrchu. Un o'r materion yr ydym ni'n eu hystyried yw gallu darparu'r safle sydd ei angen arnynt, o'r maint cywir. Nid ydym yn gwneud hynny o ran adeiladu adeiladau gwag am ddim rheswm. Rydym ni wedi gwneud hynny drwy ymgynghori â busnesau, a gofyn i fusnesau beth maen nhw ei eisiau. Mae hynny mewn gwirionedd yn ffordd gadarn iawn o fuddsoddi ar gyfer y dyfodol, yn hytrach na'r hyn y mae e'n ei alw'n hapfasnachol. Mae'n bell o fod yn hapfasnachol. Mae hyn yn seiliedig ar yr adborth yr ydym ni'n ei gael gan fusnesau.
English: Well, there are of course no firm offers to take space in the area that the First Minister is talking about. My colleagues and I had the advantage on Friday of visiting St Athan and seeing what's happening at the Aston Martin construction that's going on there, which is a Welsh Government success story - I fully acknowledge that and congratulate the First Minister. But, of course, St Athan is a very different kettle of fish from Ebbw Vale in terms of its potential attractiveness to investors, without improving the infrastructure still further in the northern Valleys. The whole point of the Circuit of Wales project and the job spin-offs that would come from it is not so much the racetrack itself, but the way in which the circuit would have put it on the map, in a sense, and would have attracted further automotive businesses around it. Given that, as a result of the collapse of that offer, the Welsh Government is trying now to fill a vacuum, I really can't see why he has turned down the offer of hundreds of millions of pounds of private investment where the Government's only liability was highly contingent on the total failure of the project, and the assets that would have been created fetching nothing.
Welsh: Wel, wrth gwrs, nid oes unrhyw gynigion cadarn i gymryd lle yn yr ardal y mae'r Prif Weinidog yn sôn amdani. Cefais i a'm cydweithwyr y fantais ddydd Gwener o ymweld â Sain Tathan a gweld yr hyn sy'n digwydd yn yr adeilad Aston Martin sy'n digwydd yno, sy'n un o lwyddiannau Llywodraeth Cymru - rwy'n llwyr gydnabod hynny ac yn llongyfarch y Prif Weinidog. Ond, wrth gwrs, mae Sain Tathan yn sefyllfa gwbl wahanol i Lynebwy o ran pa mor ddeniadol y gallai fod i fuddsoddwyr, heb wella'r seilwaith ymhellach fyth yn y Cymoedd gogleddol. Holl bwynt prosiect Cylchffordd Cymru a'r swyddi a fyddai wedi deillio o hynny oedd nid gymaint y gylchffordd ei hun, ond y ffordd y byddai'r gylchffordd wedi ei roi ar y map, mewn ffordd, ac y byddai wedi denu busnesau modurol pellach o'i hamgylch. O gofio, o ganlyniad i fethiant y cynnig hwnnw, bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn ceisio llenwi bwlch erbyn hyn, ni allaf wir weld pam mae wedi gwrthod y cynnig o gannoedd o filiynau o bunnoedd o fuddsoddiad preifat pan oedd unig rwymedigaeth y Llywodraeth yn hynod ddibynnol ar fethiant llwyr y prosiect, a'r asedau a fyddai wedi cael eu creu yn werth dim arian.
English: No, we've explored this before. I've explained to him the issue of what counts as on the books and off the books. What he describes is speculative. Every business venture is speculative to some extent. But in some ways, in the questions he asks, he answered his first question, and that is: one of the reasons why St Athan proved attractive to Aston Martin is because there was a building there that fitted their spec. It was what they wanted. The site was right. Many businesses have said to us in conversations I've had, 'Look, one of the issues we face in Wales is we want to go somewhere like Ebbw Vale, but where do we go? The buildings aren't there. The premises we need aren't there.' That's why part of the investment we're putting into Ebbw Vale, into the Heads of the Valleys, is to make sure that the right premises are there so businesses can move in, rather than an obstacle being in place that won't be removed without Government investment. Yes, is that speculative? Well, in the sense that all business is speculative, but it's based, to my mind, on much sounder ground than the circuit was.
Welsh: Na, rydym ni wedi archwilio hyn o'r blaen. Rwyf wedi esbonio iddo'r mater o'r hyn sy'n cyfrif fel bod ar y llyfrau ac oddi ar y llyfrau. Hapfasnachu yw'r hyn y mae e'n ei ddisgrifio. Mae pob menter fusnes yn hapfasnachol i ryw raddau. Ond mewn rhai ffyrdd, yn y cwestiynau y mae'n eu gofyn, atebodd ei gwestiwn cyntaf, sef: un o'r rhesymau pam yr oedd Sain Tathan yn ddeniadol i Aston Martin yw oherwydd bod adeilad yno a oedd yn addas i'w manyleb. Dyna'r oedden nhw ei eisiau. Roedd y safle'n iawn. Mae llawer o fusnesau wedi dweud wrthym mewn sgyrsiau yr wyf i wedi eu cael, 'Edrychwch, un o'r problemau yr ydym ni'n eu hwynebu yng Nghymru yw ein bod ni eisiau mynd i rywle fel Glynebwy, ond i ble byddwn ni'n mynd? Nid yw'r adeiladau yno. Nid yw'r safleoedd sydd eu hangen arnom ni yno.' Dyna pam mae rhan o'r buddsoddiad yr ydym ni'n ei roi i Lynebwy, i Flaenau'r Cymoedd, i wneud yn siŵr bod y safleoedd iawn yno i fusnesau allu symud i mewn, yn hytrach na chael rhwystr na fydd yn cael ei symud heb fuddsoddiad gan y Llywodraeth. A yw hynny'n hapfasnachol? Wel, yn yr ystyr bod pob busnes yn hapfasnachol, ond mae'n seiliedig, yn fy marn i, ar dir llawer mwy cadarn na'r gylchffordd.
English: But of course the Circuit of Wales was more than just speculative because there was a fully worked out business case, which I understand was not undermined by the Welsh Government. The objection of the Welsh Government's support for the project was based upon internal accounting conventions, in its opinion, in any event, set by Her Majesty's Treasury. So, the Circuit of Wales project itself will rise or fall upon its own economic merits. No doubt the First Minister will have seen on WalesOnline today that the promoters of the project have now come up with another proposal that perhaps they could access funding for under the city deal. So, I'm anxious not to engage in any kind of inter-party fisticuffs today that might discourage the Welsh Government from helping the project, even at this late stage, to become viable. I wonder if the First Minister can, in the most general terms, give his support to making further efforts to look at whether the Circuit of Wales could actually be made into a reality.
Welsh: Ond wrth gwrs roedd Cylchffordd Cymru yn fwy na hapfasnachol gan fod achos busnes wedi ei gwblhau'n llawn, yr wyf yn deall na chafodd ei danseilio gan Lywodraeth Cymru. Roedd gwrthwynebiad cefnogaeth Llywodraeth Cymru i'r prosiect yn seiliedig ar gonfensiynau cyfrifyddu mewnol, yn ei barn nhw, beth bynnag, a bennwyd gan Drysorlys Ei Mawrhydi. Felly, bydd prosiect Cylchffordd Cymru ei hun yn llwyddo neu'n methu ar sail ei rinweddau economaidd ei hun. Rwy'n siŵr y bydd y Prif Weinidog wedi gweld ar WalesOnline heddiw bod hyrwyddwyr y prosiect wedi cyflwyno cynnig arall erbyn hyn efallai y gallen nhw gael gafael ar gyllid ar ei gyfer o dan y fargen dinas. Felly, rwy'n awyddus i beidio â chymryd rhan mewn unrhyw gecru rhyngbleidiol heddiw a allai rwystro Llywodraeth Cymru rhag helpu'r prosiect, hyd yn oed ar y cam diweddar hwn, i fod yn hyfyw. Tybed a all y Prif Weinidog, yn y termau mwyaf cyffredinol, roi ei gefnogaeth i wneud ymdrechion pellach i ystyried pa un a all Cylchffordd Cymru gael ei throi'n realiti.