English: Yes. The coleg welcomes the Bill. Indeed, we were in discussions with Professor Hazelkorn a few years ago now in terms of starting this discussion, and we look forward to supporting the work of establishing the body and allowing it to take root. And to add to what Aled said, we very much welcome the fact that the Welsh language is amongst the nine strategic objectives that have been set for the commission. That is a very important development, because there wasn't a similar duty for HEFCW, for example. I think what we would note is - two things, if truth be told: is the duty sufficiently robust to deliver the objectives? The phrase 'take all reasonable stepsto meet reasonable demand' tends to be a wording that is slightly dated by now, and it's not about meeting the demand for Welsh-medium education, but encouraging that demand in a proactive way. And, indeed, that is what happened to a great extent - for example, in terms of the language plans for counties that the local authorities put together. So, if we want the commission to have a positive impact on Welsh-medium provision and bilingual provision, we would be very eager to look further at that wording that I mentioned and how it could be strengthened. There are details in the memorandum and in the impact assessment in terms of how the coleg would have joint responsibility with the commission for development with regard to the Welsh language in the tertiary sector. That's a sector where we do think that there needs to be greater clarity, to ensure that that relationship develops on a positive basis from the outset, but perhaps we'll have an opportunity to come back to that later on.
Welsh: Ie. Mae'r coleg yn croesawu'r Bil. Yn wir, buon ni mewn trafodaethau gyda'r Athro Hazelkorn rai blynyddoedd yn ôl bellach o ran dechrau'r drafodaeth yma, a dŷn ni'n edrych ymlaen at gefnogi y gwaith o sefydlu a gwreiddio'r corff. Ac i ategu beth oedd Aled yn ei ddweud, dwi'n croesawu'n fawr hefyd y ffaith bod y Gymraeg ymhlith y naw dyletswydd strategol sydd wedi cael eu pennu ar gyfer y comisiwn. Mae hwnna yn ddatblygiad pwysig, a doedd yna ddim dyletswydd tebyg wedi cael ei roi ar y Cyngor Cyllido Addysg Uwch, er enghraifft. Rwy'n credu yr unig beth byddwn i'n ei nodi yw - dau beth, mewn gwirionedd - a yw'r dyletswydd yn ddigon cryf i ddelifro ar yr amcanion? Mae'r ieithwedd 'cymryd pob cam rhesymoli ateb galw rhesymol' yn tueddu i fod yn eiriad sydd efallai wedi dyddio erbyn hyn, ac mae'n gwneud ateb y galw am addysg Gymraeg, sydd ei angen, ond symbylu y galw hwnnw mewn modd rhagweithiol. Ac, yn wir, dyna sydd yn digwydd erbyn hyn i raddau helaeth iawn - er enghraifft, o ran y cynlluniau addysg sirol mae'r awdurdodau lleol yn eu paratoi. Ac felly, os ydyn ni am i'r comisiwn gael impact cadarnhaol ar ddarpariaeth Gymraeg a dwyieithog, byddwn i'n awyddus i edrych ymhellach ar y geiriad hwnnw a sut y gellid ei gryfhau e. Mae yna fanylion yn y memorandwm ac yn yr asesiad impact am sut y byddai'r coleg â chyfrifoldeb ar y cyd â'r comisiwn dros ddatblygiadau cyfrwng Cymraeg yn y sector trydyddol. Mae hwnna'n faes eto lle dŷn ni'n meddwl bod angen rhywfaint mwy o eglurder, er mwyn sicrhau bod y berthynas honno'n datblygu ar sail gadarn o'r dechrau, ond bosib y cawn ni gyfle i ddod nôl at hwnna yn nes ymlaen.