English: I'm at a loss as well in terms of the sport that the Member refers to, but I do think that the Member makes a really important point: that you have to balance the investment in elite sport with investment in grass-roots sport, because it's essential that every single person in society has an opportunity to access what I call the escalator of activity. It doesn't matter at what level you are content with halting your performance, whether you are just going to be walking to the shops or whether you escalate it up to running every day and then eventually become an elite sportsperson, as long as you are active in some way. So, it's absolutely vital that there is sufficient resources available at grass-roots level to enable people to participate as close to home as they possibly can or, indeed, in the great outdoors. So, in terms of investment, it roughly splits £1 for every £3 - £1 invested in elite is met with £3 that's invested in community sport. Community sport also incorporates, of course, now informal ways of participating in physical activity. So, it could be walking football, or street games, or touch rugby. What we're trying to do is open opportunities to as wide a range of people as possible. The Member rightly identified as well the importance of recognising people who performed in the Paralympics and who achieved great success, and I think Disability Sport Wales have in particular in recent years shown incredible success and made great progress in engaging more people in sport and physical activity. That was reflected in the eight medals that were won in the Rio games. I think that that was an astonishing success given that, back in London 2012, there were six medals. So to increase it by such a number is really to be welcomed by all. In terms of the cost of the Commonwealth Games - and I recall that the Member broadly welcomed our position on this matter - it's not that there would be money saved in not bidding for the games. What would happen is, had we proceeded with bidding for the games, then money would have had to have been identified from existing major expenditure groups. So, essentially, a cap would have had to have gone around Government, every department - education, health, transport; it would have gone to rural affairs, to communities - and contributions would have had to have been made. So, it's not a saving as such that can be reinvested. But, as I've said to a previous speaker, the formation of the Wales well-being bond, which is aimed at investing in treatments and activities that prevent ill health, particularly mental illness, and also the initiative that we're calling the challenge fund, will aim to increase overall investment in community sport and physical activity.
Welsh: Rwyf innau ar goll hefyd o ran y gamp y mae'r Aelod yn cyfeirio ati, ond credaf fod yr Aelod yn gwneud pwynt pwysig iawn: bod rhaid cydbwyso buddsoddi mewn chwaraeon elitaidd â buddsoddi mewn chwaraeon yn y gymuned. Mae'n hanfodol fod pob unigolyn mewn cymdeithas yn cael cyfle i gael mynediad at yr hyn yr wyf i'n ei alw'n esgynnydd gweithgaredd. Does dim ots ar ba lefel yr ydych yn rhoi stop ar eich perfformiad, p'un a ydych yn mynd i fod yn cerdded i'r siopau neu'n cynyddu hynny i redeg yno bob dydd, ac yna yn y pen draw yn dod yn sbortsmon elît, cyn belled â'ch bod yn actif mewn rhyw ffordd neu'i gilydd. Felly, mae'n gwbl hanfodol bod digon o adnoddau ar gael ar lawr gwlad i alluogi pobl i gymryd rhan mor agos i'w cartref ag y gallant neu, yn wir, yn yr awyr agored. Felly, o ran buddsoddi, mae'n rhannu £1 am bob £3 yn fras - am bob £1 a fuddsoddir yn yr elît mae £3 yn cael ei fuddsoddi mewn chwaraeon cymunedol. Mae chwaraeon cymunedol hefyd yn awr yn cynnwys, wrth gwrs, ffyrdd anffurfiol o gymryd rhan mewn gweithgarwch corfforol. Felly, gallai fod yn bêl-droed cerdded, neu gemau stryd neu rygbi cyffwrdd. Yr hyn yr ydym yn ceisio ei wneud yw agor cyfleoedd i ystod mor eang o bobl â phosibl. Nododd yr Aelod yn briodol hefyd bwysigrwydd rhoi cydnabyddiaeth i bobl a berfformiodd yn y Gemau Paralympaidd ac a gafodd lwyddiant mawr. Rwy'n meddwl bod Chwaraeon Anabledd Cymru yn arbennig yn y blynyddoedd diwethaf wedi dangos llwyddiant anhygoel ac wedi gwneud cynnydd mawr o ran cael mwy o bobl i gymryd rhan mewn chwaraeon a gweithgarwch corfforol . Mae hynny'n cael ei adlewyrchu yn yr wyth medal a enillwyd yng ngemau Rio. Credaf fod hynny yn llwyddiant rhyfeddol o ystyried, yn ôl yn Llundain 2012, y cafwyd chwe medal. Felly, mae cynnydd o'r fath i'w groesawu gan bawb yn wir. O ran cost Gemau'r Gymanwlad - ac rwy'n cofio bod yr Aelod wedi rhoi croeso cyffredinol i'n safbwynt ni ar y mater hwn - nid yw'n fater o arian yn cael ei arbed drwy beidio â gwneud cais am y gemau. Pe byddem wedi bwrw ymlaen â'r cynnig am y gemau, yr hyn fyddai'n digwydd wedyn byddai arian yn gorfod cael ei nodi o grwpiau gwariant mawr sy'n bodoli eisoes. Felly, yn y bôn, byddai het wedi gorfod mynd o gwmpas y Llywodraeth, pob adran - addysg, iechyd, trafnidiaeth; byddai wedi mynd i faterion gwledig, i gymunedau - a byddai cyfraniadau wedi gorfod cael eu gwneud. Felly, nid yw'n arbediad y gellir ei ail-fuddsoddi fel y cyfryw. Ond, fel y dywedais wrth siaradwr blaenorol, bydd ffurfio bond lles Cymru, sydd â'r nod o fuddsoddi mewn triniaethau a gweithgareddau sy'n atal afiechyd, yn arbennig salwch meddwl, a hefyd y fenter yr ydym yn ei galw'r gronfa her, yn anelu at gynyddu buddsoddiad cyffredinol mewn chwaraeon cymunedol a gweithgarwch corfforol.