techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you very much, and good morning to both of you. I just want to look at the question of recovery post COVID and ask specifically about the innovation that needs to happen from hereon in, just to ensure that more people can be treated safely and in a timely manner. So, what's your opinion as to the main areas where we need to innovate? It could be creating COVID-lite areas or hospitals, or safe wards, reinforce how we test staff and patients so that we increase the stream of patients coming in. Andy first.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, a bore da i'r ddau ohonoch chi. Dwi jest eisiau edrych ar y cwestiwn o adfer ar ôl COVID a gofyn yn benodol am yr arloesi sydd angen digwydd o hyn ymlaen er mwyn sicrhau bod mwy o bobl yn gallu cael triniaeth yn ddiogel ac yn amserol. Beth ydy'ch barn chi ynglŷn â'r prif feysydd lle mae angen arloesi? Gallai o fod yn creu ardaloedd COVID lite neu ysbytai COVID lite, ardaloedd COVID ddiogel, cryfhau sut ydyn ni'n profi staff a chleifion er mwyn gwella llif y cleifion, ac ati. Andy gyntaf.
English: Thank you for that very comprehensive answer. Richard, I don't know if you had anything to add to that.
Welsh: Andy, diolch am yr ateb cynhwysfawr iawn, iawn yna. Richard, dwi ddim yn gwybod os oes gennych chi rywbeth i'w ychwanegu at hynny.
English: Thank you very much. Good afternoon. It's to Elin Edwards from the RNIB that these questions are directed. Just first of all, can we have an overview from you of where we are in terms of the waiting times for ophthalmology services by now, and perhaps compared with the situation pre pandemic also?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Prynhawn da. At Elin Edwards o'r RNIB mae fy nghyfres i o gwestiynau wedi'u hanelu. Allwn ni, jest yn gyntaf, gael rhyw drosolwg gennych chi o le dŷn ni arni o ran rhestrau aros offthalmoleg erbyn hyn, ac, o bosib, cymharu efo'r sefyllfa cyn mynd i mewn i'r pandemig hefyd?
English: Thank you very much. And I should thank you also for the briefing information you sent in advance, noting some of those figures. What measures are being undertaken at the minute in order to understand how much worse things have become, because some of the figures that you have quoted are very concerning? If it is essential that people in that high-risk layer keep to their appointment and that so many of them are failing to meet that, then that means that a significant percentage are likely to lose their sight. So, how do you measure how bad things have become?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Ac mi ddylwn i ddiolch hefyd i chi am anfon gwybodaeth briffio ymlaen llaw yn nodi rhai o'r ffigurau yna. Pa fesur sydd yn mynd ymlaen ar hyn o bryd er mwyn trio deall faint yn waeth mae pethau wedi mynd, achos mae rhai o'r ffigurau rydych chi wedi'u crybwyll yn fanna'n bryderus iawn? Os ydy'n hanfodol bod pobl yn yr haen risg uchaf yn cadw at eu hamserlen apwyntiad a bod yna gymaint ohonyn nhw'n methu, mae hynny'n golygu bod cyfran sylweddol mewn peryg o golli'u golwg. Sut dŷn ni'n trio mesur yn union ba mor ddrwg mae pethau'n mynd?
English: Given that we have this risk-based way of looking at the risk that these patients face, is there a way of prioritising people in a different way, because that's what we see happening in other services within the NHS - an effort to prioritise things in order to see who needs treatment most urgently? Do we need to triage that in a different way with ophthalmology patients too?
Welsh: O feddwl bod gennym ni'r ffordd risk based yma o edrych ar y perygl y mae cleifion yn ei wynebu, oes modd blaenoriaethu pobl mewn ffordd wahanol, achos dyna rydyn ni'n ei weld yn digwydd mewn gwasanaethau eraill o fewn ein gwasanaeth iechyd - ymdrech i drio blaenoriaethu, gweld pwy sydd angen cael triniaeth ar fwyaf o frys? Oes angen blaenoriaethu mewn ffordd wahanol efo cleifion offthalmoleg hefyd?
English: That's the challenge when everybody become a priority. If COVID has done anything good in terms of eye care, one thing that we have seen is the Government accelerating the changes taking place in the community. The hope is that high-street optometry will be more of a triage system so they can see more people closer to their communities, and that's something that we welcome and we've also been pushing for that for a long time, but, because of the pandemic, that's started to happen. We obviously believe it important that that should happen quickly. With these major changes in optometry, it's important that they're communicated to the patients. The hope is that that will start to release more capacity in secondary care, but, also, there are broader problems that need to be identified and resolved.
Welsh: Dyna ydy'r her pan fydd pawb yn troi mewn i flaenoriaeth, wrth reswm. Os yw COVID wedi gwneud unrhyw beth da o ran gofal llygad, un o'r pethau rŷn ni wedi'i weld ydy'r Llywodraeth yn prysuro faint o newid sydd yn mynd i ddigwydd yn y gymuned. Felly, y gobaith yw y bydd optometry ar y stryd fawr yn fwy o triage system fel eu bod nhw'n gallu gweld mwy o bobl yn agos i'w cymuned nhw, ac mae hynny'n rhywbeth rŷn ni'n ei groesawu ac rŷn ni hefyd wedi bod yn ei wthio ers amser hir, ond, oherwydd y pandemig, mae hynny wedi dechrau digwydd nawr. I ni, yn amlwg, mae'n bwysig bod hynny'n digwydd yn sydyn. Fel mae'r newidiadau mawr yma'n digwydd i optometry, mae'n bwysig bod hynny'n cael ei gyfathrebu i'r cleifion, a'r gobaith yw y bydd hynny'n dechrau rhyddhau mwy o gapasiti yn secondary care wedyn. Ond, hefyd, mae yna broblemau lot yn fwy eang sydd angen eu hadnabod a'u datrys.
English: My final question, therefore: do you have confidence in what you are seeing being done by health boards and the Welsh Government - that they are doing what's needed in order to invest in increasing capacity in order to deal with the backlog that has grown? Are you happy with the level and urgency of the investment that's being made?
Welsh: Y cwestiwn olaf gen i, efallai: oes gennych chi hyder yn beth rydych chi'n ei weld yn cael ei wneud gan fyrddau iechyd a'r Llywodraeth, a'u bod nhw'n gwneud beth sydd ei angen er mwyn buddsoddi i gynyddu capasiti er mwyn delio â'r backlog sydd wedi tyfu? Ydych chi'n hapus â lefel ac urgency y buddsoddiad sy'n mynd ymlaen ar hyn o bryd?
English: I think that, necessarily, because of the scale of the problem, and because of the terrible numbers I mentioned earlier, that this has to be seen as a priority. It's also something that's not going to go away, and I mentioned earlier that we need to look at the urgent things, but the number of those living with sight loss is going to increase as well, so we need to resolve the situation when it comes to capacity. We do welcome the changes that are happening in terms of moving towards the community, as I mentioned, but that needs to happen urgently. There are differences across health boards. We need to understand those better and the Government needs to understand why those differences exist. I would suspect that those health boards that have started to do more in the community have shorter waiting lists, but we need to see that detail. We know that it's a very complex issue, but we need to tackle it, and we do welcome the changes that are happening with optometry.
Welsh: Dwi'n meddwl, o reidrwydd, oherwydd sgêl y broblem ac oherwydd y niferoedd erchyll y soniais i amdanyn nhw yn gynharach, mae'n rhaid i hwn gael ei weld yn flaenoriaeth. Mae e hefyd yn rhywbeth sydd ddim yn mynd i ffwrdd, ac mi wnes i sôn yn gynharach bod angen edrych ar bethau urgent, ond hefyd mae'r niferoedd sydd yn mynd i fod yn byw efo colli golwg yn mynd i fyny drwy'r amser, felly mae angen datrys y sefyllfa pan fydd hi'n dod i gapasiti. Rŷn ni'n croesawu'r newidiadau sydd yn digwydd o ran symud i'r gymuned, fel gwnes i sôn, ond mae angen i hwnna ddigwydd ar frys. Mae yna wahaniaethau ar draws byrddau iechyd. Mae angen deall y rheini'n fwy; mae angen i'r Llywodraeth ddeall pam mae'r gwahaniaethau yno. Buaswn i'n tybio bod y byrddau iechyd yna sydd wedi dechrau gwneud mwy yn y gymuned efallai â rhestrau aros llai, ond mae angen y manylder yna ar hyn o bryd. Rŷn ni'n gwybod ei fod e'n complex iawn hefyd ac mae'n rhywbeth sydd angen mynd i'r afael ag ef. Ac rŷn ni yn croesawu'r gwaith sy'n digwydd, fel y gwnes i sôn, yn optometry.
English: But, as it stands, there are people out there who face losing their sight because of the longer waiting lists.
Welsh: Ond, fel mae'n sefyll, mae yna bobl allan yna sy'n wynebu colli eu golwg oherwydd y cynnydd mewn rhestrau aros.
English: Yes, that's a fact. We know that people have lost their sight over this period, and we don't know how many, but what we are hearing, as the Royal National Institute of Blind People, is the emotional impact that that's having and which is continuing. For example, we have an eye clinic liaison officer service, which is something that we've been operating for more than 20 years across the country, and we know that the kinds of things that people contact them about show how essential that service is. We also have a counselling service, and they've been very busy, and we have a waiting list for that of more than nine months. So, it shows that the need does exist. And, as we know - one other thing to mention - the impact that the pandemic has had on people living with sight loss is unique, perhaps. When you think about moving around our towns and social distancing, and taking public transport and so forth, many of these challenges can be unique to people with sight loss. And we have some research that I might be able to mention, which shows the impact that this has had on people emotionally: 56 per cent of people told us that they feel anxious about the future, and 47 per cent of people said that they feel isolated from other people because of these changes. We know, therefore, that this is going to have an impact on mental health care, and that's also a part of this package that we will need to better understand.
Welsh: Oes, mae hwnna'n mynd i fod yn ffaith. Dŷn ni'n gwybod bod pobl wedi colli'u golwg dros yr amser yma, ond dŷn ni ddim yn gwybod faint. Beth dŷn ni'n clywed, fel yr RNIB, yw'r effaith emosiynol sydd yn dal i barhau. Er enghraifft, mae gennym ni wasanaeth eye clinic liaison officer, sydd yn rhywbeth dŷn ni wedi bod yn ei weithredu ers dros 20 o flynyddoedd ar draws y wlad, ac rŷn ni'n gwybod bod y math o bethau mae pobl yn cysylltu amdanyn nhw efo nhw yn dangos pa mor hanfodol yw'r gwasanaeth yna. A'n gwasanaeth cwnsela ni, er enghraifft, mae hynny wedi bod yn reit brysur, ac mae rhestr aros gyda ni ar gyfer hwnna o dros naw mis. Felly, mae'n dangos bod yr angen yna. Ac fel dŷn ni'n gwybod - efallai un peth arall jest i sôn amdano fe hefyd - mae'r effaith mae'r pandemig wedi ei chael ar bobl sydd yn byw efo colled golwg efallai yn unigryw hefyd. Pan fyddwch chi'n meddwl am jest symud ar hyd ein trefi ni, efo pellter cymdeithasol, efo cymryd public transport ac yn y blaen, mae yna lot o'r heriau yma'n gallu bod yn unigryw i bobl sydd â cholled golwg. Mae gennym ni bach o ymchwil efallai y byddwn i'n medru sôn amdano fan hyn, sydd jest yn dangos yr effaith mae hwnna wedi'i chael ar bobl yn emosiynol. Mae gennym ni 56 y cant yn dweud wrthym ni eu bod nhw nawr yn teimlo'n anxious am y dyfodol, a 47 y cant yn teimlo'u bod nhw wedi ynysu oddi wrth bobl eraill oherwydd y newidiadau yma. Dŷn ni'n gwybod, felly, fod hwn yn mynd i gael effaith ar ofal iechyd meddwl, ac mae hwnna eto'n rhan o'r package yma ac yn rhywbeth bydd yn rhaid i ni ddeall yn fwy.
English: And may I invite you to share that information with this committee? I would be grateful. I'll leave it there. Thank you very much, Elin.
Welsh: A gaf fi eich gwahodd chi i rannu'r ymchwil yna efo'r pwyllgor? Buaswn i'n ddiolchgar iawn. Fe adawn ni hi yn fanna, Elin, diolch.
English: Thank you very much, and thank you for your evidence this afternoon. We've heard reference already to the report by the Board of Community Health Councils in Wales, entitled 'Feeling forgotten?' I was looking at this earlier, and it referred to a report from 2018, entitled 'Our lives on hold'. Little did we know what 'lives on hold' truly meant in 2018, but the message is clear now that we need better communication with people when they are on waiting lists. What steps - Alyson first of all, please - what specific steps need to be taken to improve communication more generally with people while they are waiting, so that they know what's going on?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, a diolch am eich tystiolaeth chi y prynhawn yma. Rydym ni wedi clywed cyfeirio'n barod at adroddiad y Bwrdd Cynghorau Iechyd Cymuned yng Nghymru, 'Ydych chi'n teimlo eich bod wedi cael eich anghofio?' Roeddwn i'n edrych ar hwnnw'n gynharach, ac roedd o'n cyfeirio at adroddiad o 2018, yn dweud 'Ein Bywydau ar Stop'. Ychydig fyddem ni wedi meddwl yn 2018 beth oedd ystyr 'bywydau ar stop' go iawn, ond mae'r neges yn glir rŵan fod angen gwell cyfathrebu efo pobl pan fyddant ar restrau aros. Pa gamau - Alyson, yn gyntaf - penodol sydd angen cael eu cymryd i wella'r cyfathrebu cyffredinol efo pobl tra maen nhw'n aros, fel eu bod nhw'n gwybod beth sy'n mynd ymlaen?
English: Helen and Kate, both of you were nodding in agreement. Would you like to comment? Who wants to go first? Yes, Helen.
Welsh: Helen a Kate, roedd y ddwy ohonoch chi'n nodio yn fanna yn cytuno. Ydych chi eisiau gwneud sylw? Pwy sydd am fynd yn gyntaf? Ie, Helen.
English: Good afternoon, Minister. I have questions with regard to Part 1 of the Bill. This first Part sets out strategic duties that are very wide-ranging for this new commission. Perhaps some would say that they're too wide-ranging or too nebulous. Are you satisfied that these duties include sufficient detail to provide certainty in law in the first instance and, secondly, to be workable for the commission?
Welsh: Prynhawn da, Weinidog. Mae'r cwestiynau sydd gyda fi ar gyfer Rhan 1 o'r Bil. Mae'r Rhan gyntaf yma'n gosod dyletswyddau strategol eang iawn i'r comisiwn newydd yma. Efallai y byddai rhai yn dweud rhy eang neu rhy niwlog. Ydych chi'n fodlon bod y dyletswyddau yn cynnwys digon o fanylion i greu sicrwydd cyfreithiol i ddechrau ac, yn ail, i fod yn ymarferol i'r comisiwn?
English: So you do think that it's workable and practical. But do you think that it provides that legal certainty? Does this strategy provide that certainty in law so that decisions can be challenged?
Welsh: Felly, rŷch chi yn meddwl bod e'n ymarferol. Ydych chi'n meddwl, felly, ei fod e'n creu'r sicrwydd cyfreithiol wedyn? Ydy'r strategaeth yma yn creu'r sicrwydd cyfreithiol wedyn fel bod modd herio penderfyniadau?
English: Well, yes, that's the intention. The duties are defined, of course, in the Bill as well. It will be a matter for the courts, of course, but, from my point of view, I don't see that this would create individual rights for individuals, but it does ensure target responsibilities and duties, if you like, so it drives the work of the commission.
Welsh: Ydyn. Wel, dyna'r bwriad. Mae'r dyletswyddau yma'n cael eu diffinio, wrth gwrs, yn y Bil hefyd. Mater i'r llys fydd hwn, wrth gwrs, ond, yn y syniad oedd gyda fi, doeddwn i ddim yn gweld y byddai hyn yn creu hawliau unigol i unigolion, hynny yw, ond mae'n sicrhau dyletswyddau targed, os hoffwch chi - hynny yw, mae'n llywio gwaith y comisiwn drwyddi draw.
English: Thank you for that. I wanted to talk then about the Senedd procedures and the fact that section 81 of the previous legislation ensured that any directions by Welsh Ministers to HEFCW, and now for this new commission - . Section 81 stated that any directions to HEFCW had to be made according to the negative procedure in the Senedd, but the same isn't true for section 19 of this Bill in terms of directions to the new commission. Why is that, and is there any specific reason in this example? And we see this, of course, in other parts of the Bill. Is there a reason why you don't provide an opportunity for the Senedd to scrutinise these directions?
Welsh: Diolch am hwnna. Rôn i eisiau sôn wedyn am weithdrefnau'r Senedd a'r ffaith bod adran 81 o'r hen ddeddf yn sicrhau bod unrhyw gyfarwyddiadau gan Weinidogion Cymru i HEFCW, a nawr i'r comisiwn newydd - . Roedd adran 81 yn dweud bod unrhyw gyfarwyddiadau i HEFCW yn ddarostyngedig i weithdrefn negyddol y Senedd, ond dyw hynny ddim yn wir am adran 19 o'r Bil yma ar gyfer y cyfarwyddiadau i'r comisiwn newydd. Pam hynny, ac oes unrhyw reswm penodol am yr enghraifft yma? Ac rŷn ni'n gweld hyn mewn ambell i le trwy'r Bil. Oes yna reswm, felly, eich bod chi ddim yn rhoi cyfle i'r Senedd graffu ar y cyfarwyddiadau yma?
English: Well, I wouldn't put it in quite that same way, if I may say so. In this specific example, you're right, of course, to say that it has changed from the situation that was seen in the 1992 Act. It's the context that's important in this regard. If you look at what's happened during COVID, of course, there's been a need to be able to provide direction under other legislation - for example, for Qualifications Wales. We made directions for them with regard to examinations. That had to be done as a matter of urgency as a result of COVID. So, that is what is happening here. There is a process in the Bill, of course, to do that, and it's about that ability to ensure that things happen swiftly when that is required. That's the reasoning behind this. But, as I said to the Chair at the beginning, if you as a committee don't feel that that balance has been struck in the right way, of course I would be very interested in hearing your stance on that.
Welsh: Wel, byddwn i ddim yn ei ddodi fe cweit yn y ffordd hynny, os caf i ddweud. Yn yr enghraifft benodol hon, rŷch chi'n iawn i ddweud, wrth gwrs, ei fod e wedi newid o'r sefyllfa sydd yn Neddf 1992. Rwy'n credu efallai mai'r cyd-destun sydd yn bwysig eto i hyn. Os edrychwch chi ar beth sydd wedi digwydd yng nghyfnod COVID, er enghraifft, mae wedi bod angen i allu rhoi cyfarwyddiadau o dan ddeddfwriaeth eraill - er enghraifft, i Cymwysterau Cymru. Gwnaethom ni roi cyfarwyddiadau iddyn nhw ynglŷn ag arholiadau. Roedd rhaid gwneud hynny ar frys yng nghyd-destun COVID. Felly, dyna sydd ar waith fan hyn. Mae proses yn y Bil, wrth gwrs, er mwyn gwneud hynny, ond y gallu i sicrhau bod pethau'n digwydd yn gyflym pan fo angen hynny yw'r ysgogiad. Ond fel gwnes i ddweud wrth y Cadeirydd ar y cychwyn, os ŷch chi fel pwyllgor yn credu nad yw'r cydbwysedd hwnnw wedi'i daro yn y ffordd iawn, wrth gwrs byddwn i â diddordeb mawr yn clywed eich safbwynt chi ar hynny.
English: The negative procedure is a swift procedure anyway, isn't it? So, why move from directions that were subject to Senedd procedures to a new system that isn't subject to Senedd procedures at all? And then, of course, there isn't that opportunity to scrutinise. The old directions were able to be scrutinised in that way.
Welsh: Mae'r weithdrefn negyddol yn broses gyflym beth bynnag, onid yw e? Pam symud, felly, o gyfarwyddiadau a oedd yn ddarostyngedig i weithdrefnau'r Senedd i system newydd sydd ddim yn ddarostyngedig i weithdrefnau'r Senedd o gwbl, a thrwy hynny, wrth gwrs, ein bod ni ddim yn cael y cyfle i graffu yr oedd yr hen system, yr hen gyfarwyddiadau, wedi'i alluogi?
English: Well, if you look across the whole Bill, there are other examples to the contrary as well - where the current process uses the negative procedure, and the Bill now has reflected exactly those similar steps with similar powers but within the affirmative procedure. So, there are examples in the Bill that go in both directions. We've looked at every section on its own merits, and we've decided on the best way of dealing with each section and each aspect.
Welsh: Wel, os edrychwch chi ar draws y Bil i gyd, mae enghreifftiau i'r gwrthwyneb hefyd - hynny yw, lle mae'r broses bresennol yn defnyddio'r weithdrefn negyddol, mae'r Bil wedi adlewyrchu camau tebyg, pwerau tebyg, ond o fewn y weithdrefn bositif. Felly, mae enghreifftiau yn y Bil yn mynd i'r ddau gyfeiriad. Rŷn ni wedi edrych ar bob un ar ei liwt ei hun, os hoffwch chi, a chloriannu beth rŷn ni'n meddwl yw'r ffordd orau o ddelio gyda fe. Maen nhw wedi mynd y ddwy ffordd, os gallaf ddweud.
English: Thank you, Chair. Minister, you've answered a few of the questions that I was going to ask with regard to why powers are there and you don't want to use them at the moment - reserve powers. So, I won't rehearse old ground. I'm sure the answers would be the same as those you gave to Peter Fox. But I did just want to mention section 105 of the Bill, which includes a power to make detailed regulations regarding the matters that the commission will have to take into account before deciding whether funding can be passed to a body. So, considering the detail that will be in these regulations - they have to be detailed because of what the commission will have to consider - and considering that we are talking about large sums of money here, why are those regulations only subject to the negative procedure rather than the affirmative procedure within the Senedd? Of course, the affirmative procedure means that there would be better scrutiny than in the case of the negative procedure. Is there a specific reason for that? Do you agree with me that, if we're talking about something that is so important, there is a need for robust transparency when you're transferring large sums of money? Is there a reason why you haven't used the affirmative procedure in that instance?
Welsh: Diolch, Gadeirydd. Weinidog, rydych chi wedi ateb ambell i gwestiwn roeddwn i'n mynd i ofyn ynglŷn â pham fod pwerau yna a'ch bod chi ddim eisiau eu defnyddio ar hyn o bryd, pwerau wrth gefn. Felly gwnaf i ddim mynd dros ambell i un. Rwyf i'n siŵr mai'r un atebion y bydden nhw â beth roddoch chi i Peter Fox. Roeddwn i jest yn moyn sôn yn sydyn am adran 105 o'r Bil. Mae hwn yn cynnwys y pŵer i wneud rheoliadau manwl ynglŷn â beth fydd rhaid i'r comisiwn newydd ei ystyried cyn iddyn nhw roi arian i gorff. Wrth ystyried y manylder a fydd yn y rheoliadau yna - mae'n rhaid bod yn fanwl am yr hyn mae'n rhaid i'r comisiwn ei ystyried - ac wrth hefyd ystyried ein bod ni yn, siŵr o fod, mynd i siarad am symiau mawr o arian, pam fod y rheoliadau yna, felly, yn ddarostyngedig i'r weithdrefn negyddol yn hytrach na'r weithred bositif - y weithdrefn gadarnhaol o fewn y Senedd? Wrth gwrs, byddai'r weithdrefn gadarnhaol yn golygu y byddai yna graffu gwell na'r weithdrefn negyddol. Oes yna ryw reswm penodol? Ac ydych chi'n cytuno â fi, os ydym ni'n siarad am rywbeth sydd mor bwysig, fod angen tryloywder cryf pan ŷch chi'n trosglwyddo symiau fel yna o arian? Oes yna reswm pam nad ydych chi wedi defnyddio'r weithdrefn gadarnhaol?
English: These bodies that do collaborate collaborate with bodies that are subject to the control of the commission already, so that is the scenario we describe here. What the commission does is ensure that there is a right to transfer those funds on. But you're entirely right that it's very important that that happens in a way that safeguards public funds and those important principles associated with that process. The specific answer to your question is, again, that these are technical issues on the whole. Does the body that will receive the funding reflect the principles of the strategic plan of the commission, or do they have appropriate regulatory arrangements in place? So, these are technical issues but, perhaps, ultimately they're very detailed. That's how I would describe those things.
Welsh: Mae'r cyrff yma sydd yn cydweithio yn cydweithio gyda chyrff sydd yn ddarostyngedig i reolaeth gan y comisiwn eisoes, felly dyna'r senario ŷn ni'n ei ddisgrifio. Beth mae'r comisiwn yn ei wneud yw sicrhau bod hawl pasio'r arian yna ymlaen. Ond rŷch chi, wrth gwrs, yn llygad eich lle i ddweud ei bod hi'n bwysig iawn bod hynny'n digwydd mewn ffordd sydd yn diogelu arian cyhoeddus a'r egwyddorion pwysig eraill hynny. Yr ateb penodol i'ch cwestiwn chi yw, eto, fod y pethau yma'n bethau'n dechnegol ar y cyfan. Hynny yw, ydy'r corff fydd yn derbyn yr arian yn adlewyrchu egwyddorion cynllun strategol y comisiwn, dyweder, neu a oes ganddyn nhw drefniadau rheoleiddio ariannol sydd yn addas? Felly, pethau technegol ond, efallai, ar ddiwedd y dydd, manwl. Dyna sut fyddwn i'n disgrifio'r pethau hynny.