techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you for those answers. I think it's very important that we are in a position to understand the implications upon Welsh law of an occasion where we have a 'no deal' and we are literally leaving the EU on 30 March 2019 without any protections, in one sense, and we've lost a lot of the protections the EU gave us. Therefore, can you confirm that you are in discussions with the UK Government as to how those protections can be put into place, particularly for workers' rights and our citizens' protections, to ensure that we can continue without the loss of that protection? And, at the same time, are you also looking at the situation where we in Wales also have the ability to look at UK law? I'm particularly concerned about the trade deal agreements and the trade deals that might happen, and how they may actually impose upon devolved competencies if a trade deal is done with our nation, and what rights we have as a consequence of an agreement made, which may impact upon devolved areas.
Welsh: Diolch i chi am yr atebion hynny. Credaf ei bod hi'n bwysig iawn ein bod mewn sefyllfa i ddeall goblygiadau senario 'dim bargen' ar gyfraith Cymru ac rydym, yn llythrennol, yn gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd ar 30 Mawrth 2019 heb unrhyw amddiffyniadau, ar un ystyr, ac rydym wedi colli llawer o amddiffyniadau a roddodd yr UE ni. Felly, a allwch chi gadarnhau eich bod mewn trafodaethau gyda Llywodraeth y DU ynglŷn â sut y gellid rhoi'r amddiffyniadau hynny ar waith, yn enwedig ar gyfer hawliau gweithwyr ac amddiffyniadau ein dinasyddion, er mwyn sicrhau ein bod yn gallu parhau heb golli'r amddiffyniad hwnnw? Ac ar yr un pryd, a ydych hefyd yn edrych ar y sefyllfa lle mae gennym ni yng Nghymru allu hefyd i edrych ar gyfraith y DU? Rwy'n arbennig o bryderus ynglŷn â'r cytundebau masnach a'r bargeinion masnach a allai ddigwydd, a sut y gallant effeithio ar gymwyseddau datganoledig os gwneir bargen fasnach gyda'n gwlad ni, a pha hawliau a fydd gennym o ganlyniad i wneud cytundeb, a allai effeithio ar feysydd datganoledig.
English: Making Welsh law more accessible continues to be a priority. We are finalising a legislation Bill that is intended to formalise the Government's long-term commitment to simplifying Welsh law and making it more accessible. I intend to introduce the Bill before the end of this year.
Welsh: Mae sicrhau bod y gyfraith yn fwy hygyrch yng Nghymru yn parhau i fod yn flaenoriaeth. Rydym yn cwblhau Bil deddfwriaeth ar hyn o bryd, a'r bwriad yw y bydd yn ffurfioli ymrwymiad hirdymor y Llywodraeth i symleiddio cyfraith Cymru a'i gwneud yn fwy hygyrch. Rwy'n bwriadu cyflwyno'r Bil cyn diwedd y flwyddyn.
English: Thank you for that answer, Counsel General. I know you spoke at the Bevan Foundation event recently at the Eisteddfod on these issues, and you talked about how access to justice, and the accessibility of our laws, are fundamental requirements of the rule of law. It's how people have their voices heard, exercise their rights, challenge discrimination and hold decision makers to account. But would you agree that, very sadly, as alluded to by my colleague Mick Antoniw earlier, under this UK Tory Government we have gone backwards on those important principles? Could you therefore confirm that promoting and protecting access to justice is a constant theme for the laws created by this Welsh Parliament?
Welsh: Diolch i chi am yr ateb hwnnw, Gwnsler Cyffredinol. Gwn eich bod wedi siarad am y materion hyn yn ddiweddar yn nigwyddiad Sefydliad Bevan yn yr Eisteddfod, ac fe siaradoch chi ynglŷn â sut y mae mynediad at gyfiawnder, a hygyrchedd ein deddfau, yn ofynion sylfaenol mewn perthynas â rheolaeth y gyfraith. Dyna sut y mae pobl yn sicrhau bod eu lleisiau'n cael eu clywed, yn arfer eu hawliau, yn herio gwahaniaethu ac yn dwyn y rhai sy'n gwneud penderfyniadau i gyfrif. Ond a fyddech yn cytuno, yn anffodus, fel y soniodd fy nghyd-Aelod Mick Antoniw yn gynharach, o dan Lywodraeth Dorïaidd y DU, ein bod wedi mynd tuag yn ôl mewn perthynas â'r egwyddorion pwysig hynny? A allech chi gadarnhau felly fod hyrwyddo a diogelu mynediad at gyfiawnder yn thema gyson ar gyfer y deddfau sy'n cael eu creu gan Senedd Cymru?
English: Absolutely. I believe very strongly that, whether it's in this place, or in the UK Parliament, where rights are created for individuals, and a responsibility is imposed on others, we have to ensure that people's rights are protected, and that people have a realistic ability to access redress through courts and through tribunals where their rights and entitlements are being infringed. For us here in Wales, we have limited formal powers in relation to the justice system. I regard, therefore, the ambition of this Government to make the laws that we pass here more easily understood, more easily accessible to people in Wales, not just as a fundamental part of the democratic settlement, and democratic obligations of this institution, and the Welsh Government, but also fundamental to any notion of social justice, so that people know what their rights are and know how they can seek redress when those are infringed. I look forward to bringing forward that legislation in due course.
Welsh: Yn sicr. Yn y lle hwn, neu yn Senedd y DU, lle mae hawliau'n cael eu creu ar gyfer unigolion, a lle gosodir cyfrifoldeb ar eraill, credaf yn gryf iawn fod yn rhaid i ni sicrhau bod hawliau pobl yn cael eu diogelu, a bod gan bobl allu realistig i geisio iawn drwy lysoedd a thrwy dribiwnlysoedd pan dramgwyddir yn erbyn eu hawliau. I ni yma yng Nghymru, mae gennym bwerau ffurfiol cyfyngedig mewn perthynas â'r system gyfiawnder. Felly, ystyriaf fod uchelgais y Llywodraeth hon i sicrhau bod y cyfreithiau rydym yn eu pasio yma yn haws eu deall, yn fwy hygyrch i bobl yng Nghymru, nid yn unig yn rhan sylfaenol o'r setliad democrataidd a rhwymedigaethau democrataidd y sefydliad hwn a Llywodraeth Cymru, ond hefyd yn rhan sylfaenol o unrhyw gysyniad o gyfiawnder cymdeithasol, fel bod pobl yn gwybod beth yw eu hawliau ac yn gwybod sut y gallant geisio iawn pan dramgwyddir yn erbyn yr hawliau hynny. Edrychaf ymlaen at gyflwyno'r ddeddfwriaeth honno maes o law.
English: I'm pleased the Welsh Government's views on pheasant shooting and associated activities on public land have been considered by Natural Resources Wales, and welcome their board's decision on 20 September to bring an end to these activities on the Welsh Government estate once current lease agreements expire.
Welsh: Rwy'n falch fod safbwyntiau Llywodraeth Cymru ar saethu ffesantod a gweithgareddau cysylltiedig ar dir cyhoeddus wedi cael eu hystyried gan Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru, ac rwy'n croesawu penderfyniad eu bwrdd ar 20 Medi i roi terfyn ar y gweithgareddau hyn ar ystâd Llywodraeth Cymru pan ddaw'r cytundebau prydles cyfredol i ben.
English: Thank you, Minister. This announcement from Natural Resources Wales is excellent news, and it's only right that publicly owned land will not now be used to permit cruelty and slaughter, masquerading in the name of sport. I also want to thank you personally for your decisive intervention, giving a clear moral steer, and I know that this has been recognised by animal welfare organisations. But the majority of shooting takes place on private land. So, can you provide any update on plans for a consultation on the code of practice on rearing game birds? This is urgent and necessary, given the welfare concerns there are about birds in the shooting industry, which are often bred and raised in worse conditions than battery hens.
Welsh: Diolch i chi, Weinidog. Mae'r cyhoeddiad hwn gan Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru yn newyddion gwych, ac nid yw ond yn briodol na fydd tir mewn perchenogaeth gyhoeddus yn cael ei ddefnyddio mwyach i ganiatáu creulondeb a lladd yn enw chwaraeon. Hefyd, hoffwn ddiolch i chi'n bersonol am eich ymyrraeth bendant, gan roi arweiniad moesol clir, a gwn fod hyn wedi cael ei gydnabod gan sefydliadau lles anifeiliaid. Ond mae'r rhan fwyaf o'r saethu yn digwydd ar dir preifat. Felly, a allwch roi unrhyw wybodaeth bellach am gynlluniau i gynnal ymgynghoriad ar y cod ymarfer ar fagu adar hela? Mae hwn yn fater brys ac angenrheidiol, o ystyried y pryderon am les adar yn y diwydiant saethu, sy'n aml yn cael eu magu mewn amgylchiadau gwaeth na ieir batri.
English: I thank the Member for her question and her interest in this area. It is right that the decision will bring an end the leasing of land for pheasant shooting on Welsh Government land once current lease agreements expire. In terms specifically of the code of practice for the welfare of game birds reared for sporting purposes, that's actually a matter for the Cabinet Secretary. But I am able to say that work is ongoing to revise the existing Welsh Government codes of practice for laying hens, broilers and pigs, and due to an increased demand for legal and policy support in light of Brexit negotiations, the publication of these codes has been delayed. However, priority for revising the codes agreed with stakeholders and work to update the current code of practice on further welfare of game birds raised for sporting purposes will commence following publication of the agreed priorities.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am ei chwestiwn ac am ei diddordeb yn y maes hwn. Mae'n gywir y bydd y penderfyniad yn rhoi diwedd ar brydlesu tir ar gyfer saethu ffesantod ar dir Llywodraeth Cymru pan ddaw'r cytundebau prydles cyfredol i ben. Mewn perthynas â'r cod ymarfer ar gyfer lles adar hela a gaiff eu magu at ddibenion chwaraeon, mater i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yw hwnnw mewn gwirionedd. Ond gallaf ddweud bod gwaith yn mynd rhagddo i adolygu codau ymarfer cyfredol Llywodraeth Cymru ar gyfer ieir dodwy, brwyliaid a moch, ac o ganlyniad i fwy o alw am gymorth cyfreithiol a pholisi yng ngoleuni trafodaethau Brexit, mae oedi wedi bod yn y broses o gyhoeddi'r codau hyn. Fodd bynnag, bydd y gwaith o adolygu'r codau y cytunwyd arnynt gyda rhanddeiliaid a gwaith ar ddiweddaru'r cod ymarfer cyfredol ar les pellach adar hela a gaiff eu magu at ddibenion chwaraeon yn parhau ar ôl cyhoeddi'r blaenoriaethau y cytunwyd arnynt.
English: Minister, I think it's a deeply regrettable decision that you have taken. In many vulnerable communities, there will be redundancy notices served to many employees who rely on the shooting industry to provide employment where few alternatives are available to them. So, by your actions, you will be helping to serve those redundancy notices, Minister. But I'd like to ask you a simple question, if I may: NRW commissioned a report into this very subject, which cost them £45,000. Based on that report, an unanimous decision was taken at the board of NRW in July not to support the withdrawal or the licensing of shooting on public-owned land. You intervened as the Minister, which is your right as the Minister, as the owner of that land, to give them guidance to change that decision. So, can you confirm that this is a political decision that you have taken and is not based on the science, or if you have additional information, can you make that information available, because, clearly, the report that NRW commissioned, at a cost of £45,000, informed their decision that was unanimously backed by their board?
Welsh: Weinidog, credaf eich bod wedi gwneud penderfyniad anffodus iawn. Mewn llawer o gymunedau sy'n agored i niwed, bydd hysbysiadau diswyddo yn cael eu cyflwyno i lawer o weithwyr sy'n dibynnu ar y diwydiant saethu i ddarparu gwaith lle nad oes ond ychydig o opsiynau amgen ar gael iddynt. Felly, bydd eich gweithredoedd yn helpu i gyflwyno'r hysbysiadau diswyddo hynny, Weinidog. Ond hoffwn ofyn cwestiwn syml i chi, os caf: comisiynodd Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru adroddiad ar y pwnc hwn a gostiodd £45,000 iddynt. Yn seiliedig ar yr adroddiad hwnnw, fe wnaeth bwrdd Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru benderfyniad unfrydol ym mis Gorffennaf i beidio â chefnogi diddymu neu drwyddedu saethu ar dir sy'n eiddo cyhoeddus. Fe wnaethoch chi ymyrryd fel y Gweinidog, sef eich hawl chi fel y Gweinidog, fel perchennog y tir hwnnw, er mwyn rhoi arweiniad iddynt newid y penderfyniad hwnnw. Felly, a allwch chi gadarnhau mai penderfyniad gwleidyddol a wnaethoch ac nad yw'n seiliedig ar wyddoniaeth, neu os oes gennych wybodaeth ychwanegol, a allwch ryddhau'r wybodaeth honno, oherwydd yn amlwg, fe wnaeth yr adroddiad a gomisiynwyd gan Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru ar gost o £45,000 lywio eu penderfyniad unfrydol a gafodd ei ategu gan eu bwrdd?
English: While shooting on private land is a mater for the landowner to decide, the Welsh Government needs to take account of wider considerations of public views in considering what happens on our estate. The three shoots affected by the NRW decision to stop pheasant shooting cover a combined area of fewer than 300 hectares and represent less than 1 per cent of the total number of pheasant-shooting enterprises in Wales. You said that I have every right to make an intervention. I do not see this as an intervention. NRW made it clear from the outset that the wider policy and ethical considerations would be a matter for Welsh Government as landowner. Having received the draft recommendations, we felt it incumbent on us to set out the Welsh Government's position. It's also worth noting that - [ Inaudible. ] - the Welsh Government's position is a matter for NRW's ongoing consideration and did not bind them to accept and follow our position.
Welsh: Er mai'r tirfeddiannwr fydd yn penderfynu ynglŷn â saethu ar dir preifat, mae angen i Lywodraeth Cymru roi sylw i ystyriaeth ehangach o farn y cyhoedd wrth ystyried beth sy'n digwydd ar ein hystâd. Mae arwynebedd cyfunol y tri heldir yr effeithir arnynt gan benderfyniad Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru i atal saethu ffesantod yn llai na 300 hectar ac yn cynrychioli llai nag 1 y cant o gyfanswm nifer y mentrau saethu ffesantod yng Nghymru. Dywedasoch fod gennyf bob hawl i ymyrryd. Nid wyf yn ystyried hon yn ymyrraeth. Mae Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru wedi'i gwneud yn glir o'r dechrau y byddai ystyriaethau moesegol a pholisi ehangach yn fater i Lywodraeth Cymru fel tirfeddiannwr. Ar ôl cael yr argymhellion drafft, roeddem yn teimlo ei bod yn ddyletswydd arnom i nodi safbwynt Llywodraeth Cymru. Mae hefyd yn werth nodi bod - [ Anghlywadwy. ] - safbwynt Llywodraeth Cymru yn fater ar gyfer ystyriaeth barhaus Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru ac nid yw'n eu rhwymo i dderbyn a chytuno â'r safbwynt hwnnw.
English: I welcome the decision that has been made and I wanted to congratulate the League Against Cruel Sports for the work that they've put into this particular campaign. I want to understand what your engagement will be, as a Minister, with Natural Resources Wales in relation to the groups that are involved from all sectors of society in light of this decision, because I have grave concerns about the fact that the Countryside Alliance has tweeted to call on two members of the NRW board, who spoke in favour of ending the shooting licences to resign, despite the fact that these two people did not have an interest, and then they didn't call on other members of the board, who actually do have an interest in the shooting agenda, to resign also. So, they can pick and choose where they think that there is an interest and where there isn't one. And there was an interest in the report in question, which Andrew R.T. Davies raised, because that was somebody on that particular commission report who was actually part of the shooting fraternity, and so, potentially, there was bias there, which I raised in this Chamber also today. How are we going to be able to have faith in the decisions that are made if organisations with quite significant influence on Welsh society are going to call for these outrageous claims after a well-thought-out decision was made, and one that I think the majority of the population of Wales will support?
Welsh: Croesawaf y penderfyniad a wnaed ac roeddwn am longyfarch y Gynghrair yn erbyn Chwaraeon Creulon ar y gwaith a wnaethant ar yr ymgyrch benodol hon. Rwyf eisiau deall beth fydd eich ymgysylltiad, fel Gweinidog, gyda Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru mewn perthynas â grwpiau sy'n ymwneud â hyn o bob sector yn y gymdeithas yng ngoleuni'r penderfyniad hwn, oherwydd mae gennyf bryderon difrifol am y ffaith bod y Gynghrair Cefn Gwlad wedi trydar yn galw ar ddau aelod o fwrdd Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru, a siaradodd o blaid rhoi diwedd ar y trwyddedau saethu, i ymddiswyddo, er nad oedd ganddynt fuddiant, ac ni wnaethant alw ar aelodau eraill o'r bwrdd sydd â buddiant yn yr agenda saethu i ymddiswyddo hefyd. Felly, gallant ddewis a dethol lle maent yn credu bod buddiant a lle nad oes buddiant. Ac roedd buddiant yn yr adroddiad dan sylw, a grybwyllwyd gan Andrew R.T. Davies, oherwydd roedd hwnnw'n rhywun ar yr adroddiad comisiwn penodol hwnnw a oedd yn rhan o'r frawdoliaeth saethu mewn gwirionedd, ac felly, gallai fod rhagfarn yno, a chodais hynny yn y Siambr heddiw hefyd. Sut y gallwn ymddiried yn y penderfyniadau a wneir os yw sefydliadau sydd â dylanwad sylweddol ar y gymdeithas Gymreig yn mynd i wneud yr honiadau gwarthus hyn wedi i benderfyniad a ystyriwyd yn ofalus gael ei wneud, a phenderfyniad rwy'n credu y bydd y rhan fwyaf o boblogaeth Cymru yn ei gefnogi?
English: I thank the Member for her question and for her previous questions in raising this matter within this place and beyond. I can hear from the heckling in the background that this is an issue that is emotive and it generates strong opinion from both sides. However, you're right: there was significant public opinion, particularly in terms of recommendation 3 that 60 per cent of Welsh residents were not in favour of us continuing to lease for pheasant shooting on Government land. In terms of working with stakeholders, I think it's absolutely important that NRW work across the board with all stakeholders, whether that be from stakeholders in terms of the British Association for Shooting and Conservation, the Countryside Alliance and also the animal welfare and animal rights charities, and with Welsh Government. I and the Cabinet Secretary work closely with Natural Resources Wales on these issues.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am ei chwestiwn ac am ei chwestiynau blaenorol wrth godi'r mater hwn yn y lle hwn a thu hwnt. Gallaf glywed o'r heclo yn y cefndir fod hwn yn fater sy'n ennyn teimladau cryf ac yn cynhyrchu barn gref ar y ddwy ochr. Fodd bynnag, rydych yn iawn: gwelwyd bod yna farn gyhoeddus sylweddol, yn enwedig mewn perthynas ag argymhelliad 3 a nodai nad oedd 60 y cant o drigolion Cymru o blaid parhau i brydlesu ar gyfer saethu ffesantod ar dir y Llywodraeth. O ran gweithio gyda rhanddeiliaid, credaf ei bod yn hollbwysig fod Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru yn gweithio ar draws y bwrdd gyda'r holl randdeiliaid, boed hynny gyda rhanddeiliaid o Gymdeithas Saethu a Chadwraeth Prydain, y Gynghrair Cefn Gwlad, a'r elusennau lles anifeiliaid a hawliau anifeiliaid hefyd, a chyda Llywodraeth Cymru. Rwyf fi ac Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn gweithio'n agos gyda Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru ar y materion hyn.
English: I welcome the decision very strongly and congratulate the Minister on standing firm on this. Would the Minister not agree that it does actually chime very much with what the public think about it? A poll by Animal Aid and the League Against Cruel Sports in April found that at least 71 per cent of people across Wales - including in the rural areas of mid and west Wales, where, again, shooting is very common - oppose the shooting of game birds for sport, regardless of whether it is on public or private land. So, I think there's no doubt that the Minister is acting with the mood of the people, so I congratulate her on taking that stand. I'm also concerned about the game bird code of practice, and I did ask for an urgent review in June for that code of practice, but I understand that it is a lack of inspections by the Animal and Plant Health Agency to check compliance that may be an issue. I don't know if the Minister would be able to comment on that.
Welsh: Croesawaf y penderfyniad yn gryf iawn ac rwy'n llongyfarch y Gweinidog ar ei safbwynt cadarn ar y mater hwn. Oni fyddai'r Gweinidog yn cytuno ei fod yn cyd-fynd yn glir â barn y cyhoedd ar y mater mewn gwirionedd? Canfu arolwg barn gan Cymorth Anifeiliaid a'r Gynghrair yn erbyn Chwaraeon Creulon ym mis Ebrill fod o leiaf 71 y cant o bobl ledled Cymru - gan gynnwys yn ardaloedd gwledig canolbarth a gorllewin Cymru, lle mae saethu, unwaith eto, yn gyffredin iawn - yn gwrthwynebu saethu adar hela at ddibenion chwaraeon ar dir cyhoeddus ac ar dir preifat. Credaf felly nad oes unrhyw amheuaeth fod y Gweinidog yn gweithredu yn unol â theimladau'r bobl, felly hoffwn ei llongyfarch am wneud y safiad hwnnw. Rwyf hefyd yn bryderus ynglŷn â'r cod ymarfer ar gyfer adar hela, a gofynnais am adolygiad brys o'r cod ymarfer hwnnw ym mis Mehefin, ond deallaf efallai fod diffyg archwiliadau gan yr Asiantaeth Iechyd Anifeiliaid a Phlanhigion i wirio cydymffurfiaeth yn broblem. Nid wyf yn gwybod a fyddai'r Gweinidog yn gallu gwneud sylwadau ar hynny.
English: I thank the Member for her question and her comments. On the specific things in terms of the code of practice for the welfare of game birds, I refer you back to my previous answer to our colleague Vikki Howells. Any specific concerns about the specific concerns you raised - perhaps it's a matter for the Cabinet Secretary to respond to you in writing with further detail about that, and perhaps you'd like to correspond in that manner.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am ei chwestiwn ac am ei sylwadau. O ran y pwyntiau penodol mewn perthynas â'r cod ymarfer ar gyfer lles adar hela, hoffwn eich cyfeirio'n ôl at fy ateb blaenorol i'n cyd-Aelod Vikki Howells. Mewn perthynas â'r pryderon penodol a godwyd gennych - efallai y dylai Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet ysgrifennu atoch gyda rhagor o fanylion am hynny, ac efallai y byddech yn hoffi gohebu yn y modd hwnnw.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer, for allowing me to ask a question on this, as this issue significantly impacts my own constituency, and I certainly do not welcome the decision or congratulate the Minister. There has been mention of a negative impact on the industry, but has it been considered - the knock-on effects on other sectors as well? I'm thinking of bed and breakfasts, small hotels, heavily dependent on this industry. During winter months, of course, they rely on this trade, and especially in these particular months, outside the standard tourism season. Can I ask what impact the assessment - ? What assessment has been carried out of the effects of the decision on rural Wales, on jobs, the local economy and tourism? Hundreds of hours of conservation work are undertaken by gamekeepers. They are also now at risk. Who is going to undertake this conservation work? Has this been thought about? Finally, can I ask you, Minister: will you visit Montgomeryshire with me, and visit just one of the many businesses that are now laying off staff as a result of the decision that you've supported?
Welsh: Diolch i chi, Lywydd, am ganiatáu i mi ofyn cwestiwn ar y mater hwn, oherwydd mae'n effeithio'n sylweddol ar fy etholaeth i, ac yn sicr nid wyf yn croesawu'r penderfyniad nac yn llongyfarch y Gweinidog. Mae sôn wedi bod am yr effaith negyddol ar y diwydiant, ond a gafodd y sgil-effeithiau ar sectorau eraill eu hystyried hefyd? Rwy'n meddwl am sefydliadau gwely a brecwast, gwestai bach, sy'n dibynnu'n fawr ar y diwydiant hwn. Yn ystod misoedd y gaeaf, wrth gwrs, maent yn dibynnu ar y fasnach hon, ac yn enwedig yn y misoedd penodol hyn, y tu hwnt i'r tymor twristiaeth arferol. A gaf fi ofyn pa effaith - ? Pa asesiad a wnaed o effaith y penderfyniad hwn ar y Gymru wledig, ar swyddi, yr economi leol a thwristiaeth? Mae ciperiaid yn cyflawni cannoedd o oriau o waith cadwraeth. Maent hwy hefyd mewn perygl bellach. Pwy fydd yn gwneud y gwaith cadwraeth hwn? A oes ystyriaeth wedi'i rhoi i hyn? Yn olaf, a gaf fi ofyn i chi, Weinidog: a wnewch chi ymweld â Sir Drefaldwyn gyda mi, ac ymweld ag un o'r nifer o fusnesau sydd bellach yn gorfod diswyddo staff o ganlyniad i'r penderfyniad rydych wedi'i gefnogi?