English: Thank you to the Brexit Minister for an advance copy of his statement, although I have to say that, once again, it was merely a refrain from previous statements that he has made - there was absolutely nothing new in that statement in addition to the things that he has previously said. I think it is a bit strange that the Brexit Minister and the Welsh Government take a position that criticises the Prime Minister for attempting to bring matters to a conclusion through seeking agreement for her withdrawal agreement when you are in a position, and your party is in a position in Westminster, to support the withdrawal agreement and put an end to the uncertainty so that we can get on negotiating the future relationship with the EU going forward. So, do you accept that the Labour Party in Westminster is a roadblock to securing an end to this uncertainty, because of the ability that it has to back the Prime Minister's withdrawal deal? You've accused the UK Government of squandering literally billions of pounds on 'no deal' preparations. Isn't that the responsible thing to do - to prepare for all eventualities? You could easily criticise your own Government for making similar preparations, yet, of course, you wouldn't dare, because the reality is that you have to prepare for these eventualities because it's not in our gift - it's not in the gift of one side, in a discussion and a negotiation, to determine what the outcome might actually be. Now, you know full well that the EU has made it abundantly clear that the withdrawal agreement is the only agreement on the table. You're telling the Prime Minister and the UK Government to go away and to compromise and yet I've heard no compromise from you. I've heard no compromise whatsoever from the Welsh Government on its position, which it set out in the aftermath of the EU referendum result. You know, no compromise whatsoever - you're still regurgitating the same lines, frankly, that you were regurgitating almost three years ago when the referendum result actually came about. Now, you know that there's no majority for your proposals either in the House of Commons, frankly. They've also been rejected, the proposals that your party has put forward. So, get over the criticism of the Prime Minister. Get around the table and start working to put an end to this uncertainty. And the one way that we can all do that - the one way we can bring an end to this uncertainty is to back that withdrawal agreement. Now, I want to ask you, in terms of the criticism as well of the discontent in the Conservative Party - of course, there's division in all parties, including your own. There's even division just a few seats down from you on that front row. You've got someone who takes a contrary view to the view of other colleagues in Government. I don't hear you criticising your own side for those divisions. We've seen divisions even in your literature for the EU elections, should we regretfully have to have them, in recent weeks over recess. So, I think pointing fingers and trying to highlight some of the difficulties in securing agreement within parties - you ought to have a look in the mirror at times, Minister, frankly, to see those contradictions on your own side. You say that you've got a lot of confidence for the European elections. I think that a lot of that is very misplaced indeed, because, of course, we've been seeing the problems, as I've just highlighted, already. Now, you've highlighted a number of different options - things that you think need to be done. You think that it would be helpful to prepare for a potential referendum although it wasn't clear in your conference speech recently whether you felt that we should have one after we've exited the EU, before we've exited the EU, or what principally your position might be on the questions that might be asked in that referendum. Do you accept that holding another referendum before implementing the outcome of the referendum in June 2016 would be an affront to democracy, would be an affront to the democratic processes that this country has always abided by and would be an affront to the constitution? Because, of course, we have always, as a country, implemented the outcomes of referendums regardless of whether the political establishment have always been happy with the outcome of those referendums. Quite rightly so too. So, do you think that it is wise to not implement the outcome of that referendum when it was very clear that Wales, and especially your constituency, voted to leave the EU?
Welsh: Diolch i'r Gweinidog Brexit am gopi ymlaen llaw o'i ddatganiad, er bod yn rhaid imi ddweud, unwaith eto, nad oedd yn ddim ond ailbobiad o ddatganiadau blaenorol y mae wedi eu gwneud - nid oedd dim byd newydd o gwbl yn y datganiad hwnnw yn ychwanegol at y pethau a ddywedodd o'r blaen. Rwy'n credu ei bod hi braidd yn rhyfedd fod y Gweinidog Brexit a Llywodraeth Cymru yn arddel safbwynt sy'n beirniadu Prif Weinidog y DU am geisio can pen y mwdwl ar faterion drwy geisio cytundeb ar gyfer ei chytundeb ymadael pan rydych chi mewn sefyllfa, a'ch plaid mewn sefyllfa yn San Steffan, i gefnogi'r cytundeb ymadael a rhoi terfyn ar yr ansicrwydd fel y gallwn ni fynd ati i drafod y berthynas â'r UE yn y dyfodol. Felly, a ydych chi'n derbyn fod y Blaid Lafur yn San Steffan yn rhwystr rhag rhoi terfyn ar yr ansicrwydd hwn, oherwydd y gallu sydd ganddi i gefnogi cytundeb ymadael y Prif Weinidog? Rydych chi wedi cyhuddo Llywodraeth y DU o afradu biliynau o bunnau yn llythrennol ar baratoi ar gyfer 'dim cytundeb'. Onid dyna'r peth cyfrifol i'w wneud - i baratoi ar gyfer pob posibilrwydd? Gallech feirniadu eich Llywodraeth eich hun yn hawdd am wneud paratoadau tebyg, ac eto, wrth gwrs, ni fyddech chi'n meiddio, oherwydd y gwir amdani yw bod yn rhaid ichi baratoi ar gyfer y digwyddiadau hyn oherwydd nid yw hi yn ein dwylo ni - nid yw hi yn nwylo un ochr, wrth drafod a negodi, i benderfynu beth allai'r canlyniad fod mewn gwirionedd. Nawr, fe wyddoch chi'n iawn fod yr UE wedi'i gwneud hi'n gwbl glir mai'r cytundeb ymadael yw'r unig gytundeb posib. Rydych chi'n dweud wrth Brif Weinidog a Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig am fynd ymaith a chyfaddawdu ac eto nid wyf wedi clywed unrhyw gyfaddawd gennych. Nid wyf wedi clywed unrhyw gyfaddawd gan Lywodraeth Cymru ar ei safbwynt, a nodwyd ganddi yn sgil canlyniad refferendwm yr UE. Wyddoch chi, dim cyfaddawdu o gwbl - rydych chi'n dal i ganu'r un hen dôn gron ag yr oeddech chi'n ei chanu bron i dair blynedd yn ôl pan gafwyd canlyniad y refferendwm mewn gwirionedd. Nawr, fe wyddoch chi nad oes mwyafrif i'ch cynigion yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin chwaith, a dweud y gwir. Maen nhw hefyd wedi cael eu gwrthod, y cynigion y mae eich plaid wedi'u cyflwyno. Felly, rhowch ddiwedd ar feirniadu'r Prif Weinidog. Dechreuwch gydweithio a cheisio rhoi diwedd ar yr ansicrwydd hwn. A'r un ffordd y gallwn ni i gyd wneud hynny - yr un ffordd y gallwn ni roi terfyn ar yr ansicrwydd hwn yw cefnogi'r cytundeb ymadael hwnnw. Nawr, rwyf eisiau gofyn ichi, o ran y feirniadaeth hefyd o'r anfodlonrwydd yn y Blaid Geidwadol - wrth gwrs, mae rhaniad ym mhob plaid, gan gynnwys eich un chi. Mae hyd yn oed rhaniad ychydig seddau o'ch blaen ar y rhes flaen honno. Mae gennych chi rywun sy'n arddel barn wahanol i farn cyd-Aelodau eraill yn y Llywodraeth. Nid wyf yn eich clywed yn beirniadu eich ochr chi eich hun am y rhaniadau hynny. Rydym ni wedi gweld rhaniadau hyd yn oed yn eich llenyddiaeth ar gyfer etholiadau'r UE, pe bai'n rhaid i ni, yn anffodus, eu cael, yn ystod yr wythnosau diwethaf dros y toriad. Felly, rwy'n credu bod bwrw'r bai a cheisio tynnu sylw at rai o'r anawsterau o ran sicrhau cytundeb o fewn pleidiau - y dylech chi gael golwg yn y drych ar adegau, Gweinidog, a dweud y gwir, i weld yr anghysonderau hynny yn eich plaid eich hun. Rydych chi'n dweud bod gennych chi lawer o ffydd ynghylch yr etholiadau Ewropeaidd. Rwy'n credu bod llawer o hynny'n gwbl gyfeiliornus, gan ein bod, wrth gwrs, wedi gweld y problemau, fel yr wyf i newydd dynnu sylw atyn nhw, yn barod. Nawr, rydych chi wedi tynnu sylw at nifer o wahanol ddewisiadau - pethau y credwch chi fod angen eu gwneud. Rydych chi o'r farn y byddai'n ddefnyddiol paratoi ar gyfer refferendwm posib er nad oedd hi'n glir yn eich araith yn y gynhadledd yn ddiweddar pa un a oeddech chi'n teimlo y dylem ni gael un ar ôl inni ymadael â'r UE, cyn inni ymadael â'r UE, neu beth fyddai eich safbwynt yn bennaf ar y cwestiynau y gellid eu gofyn yn y refferendwm hwnnw. A ydych chi'n derbyn y byddai cynnal refferendwm arall cyn gweithredu canlyniad y refferendwm ym mis Mehefin 2016 yn sarhad ar ddemocratiaeth, y byddai'n sarhad ar y prosesau democrataidd y mae'r wlad hon wedi eu dilyn bob amser ac y byddai'n sarhad ar y cyfansoddiad? Oherwydd, wrth gwrs, rydym ni bob amser, fel gwlad, wedi gweithredu canlyniadau refferenda ni waeth a yw'r sefydliad gwleidyddol bob amser wedi bod yn fodlon ar ganlyniad y refferenda hynny. Ac yn gwbl briodol hefyd. Felly, a ydych chi'n credu ei bod hi'n ddoeth peidio â gweithredu canlyniad y refferendwm hwnnw pan roedd hi'n amlwg iawn bod Cymru, ac yn enwedig eich etholaeth chi, wedi pleidleisio i adael yr UE?