English: Thanks to the Minister for her statement. There have obviously been some issues over the running of Sport Wales, which Russell George alluded to earlier, and we, as Members, don't have the inside information to understand all of what it was about. But it seems to me that part of the problem with the organisation in the past year or so has quite probably been about its remit. Now, we did touch on this earlier on today, but I will just quickly go over a couple of the points that have been mentioned. Traditionally, Sport Wales tended to specialise at the elite end of sport and it's only in much more recent times that it's been given any kind of responsibility to oversee grass-roots sport. It seems to me that, although it may sound like a good idea to group the two sectors together, in practice they are very different, and this can cause problems for an organisation like Sport Wales. Now, there was some evidence in the independent review that some stakeholders believe that Sport Wales prioritises elite sport at the expense of the grass-roots level. My first question was going to be: given that situation, did you still think it was viable to have one organisation representing both the elite and grass-roots levels? I think you answered that, to be fair, in your fairly strong response to Russell George's questions. But, given that there is this idea from the stakeholders that the elite level tends to get the priority, how can we overcome this? And how can you ensure that there is equal consideration given to the grass-roots level as well as to the elite level? If there are disputes over spending, over resourcing, how is that going to be resolved? Now, you did mention in your response to Russell that we needed to create a pathway to elite sport for everybody. And, yes, of course, the elite athletes have to start somewhere. I think in reality, perhaps, the children who eventually make it to the elite level of sport will generally be the ones coming from families who already have a keen interest in developing their children's sporting activities. But what we have to ensure is that we increase the take-up of ordinary physical activities by the rest of the population or, as the Welsh Government's 'Taking Wales Forward' programme puts it, increase the physical activity levels of Welsh citizens in those groups that currently have very low physical activity levels. Now, John Griffiths spoke about park runs, and I think that's exactly the kind of activity that we should be encouraging, so I'm also encouraged by your supportive remarks, and I hope that, in future, initiatives like parkrun, if they need financial support, hopefully they can get it, although I guess, with parkrun, perhaps the one thing that they may not need a lot of is financial support. But things like active travel, that certainly will need help with resourcing. This brings us on to the issue of the difference between sport and physical recreation. The 1972 royal charter that established the predecessor body to Sport Wales clearly uses the term 'sport and physical recreation'. But more recent documents associated with Sport Wales have only sometimes used both terms. Sometimes, they only mention sport in relation to Sport Wales, but contain no reference to physical recreation. Now, the report states, and I quote: 'This inconsistency is very confusing for Sport Wales' partners, some of whom claimed the organisation is "changeable" and lacking in clarity of purpose. It is equally confusing for Sport Wales' staff'. So, my next question is: does the Minister think that Sport Wales staff themselves are given a clear enough steer by their parent body on where their remit lies? And does the Welsh Government need to clarify somewhat the position? There is also another issue, which is the gap between sport and health. The danger is that the all-embracing approach could leave Sport Wales's best efforts falling in the cracks between sport and health. Now, the stated intention in 2015 was to develop a new strategy that aligns Sport Wales's measures with the chief medical officer's physical activity guidelines. However, quoting again from the report, 'despite the introduction of a Memorandum of Understanding with the NHS Confederation very little progress had been made to establish a platformbetween the sport and health sectors.' Now, I see that, in the Minister's statement today, she does mention Sport Wales and Public Health Wales and the idea of working jointly together towards joint targets. But, just to clarify that point, does the Minister think that the Welsh Government needs to give us more information on how exactly sport and health should interact? And which body does the Minister think should be taking the lead for researching and overseeing physical activity - Sport Wales or Public Health Wales? Thanks.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Gweinidog am ei datganiad. Yn amlwg, cafwyd rhai problemau yn ymwneud â rhedeg Chwaraeon Cymru, y cyfeiriodd Russell George atynt yn gynharach, ac nid ydym ni, fel Aelodau, yn meddu ar yr wybodaeth fewnol i ddeall popeth a oedd yn ymwneud â hyn. Ond ymddengys i mi fod rhan o'r broblem gyda'r sefydliad yn y flwyddyn ddiwethaf fwy na thebyg wedi bod yn ymwneud â'i gylch gwaith. Nawr, gwnaethom gyffwrdd â hyn yn gynharach heddiw, ond byddaf yn mynd dros ychydig o'r pwyntiau a wnaed. Yn draddodiadol, roedd Chwaraeon Cymru yn tueddu i arbenigo ar elitaidd chwaraeon a dim ond yn fwy diweddar y rhoddwyd unrhyw fath o gyfrifoldeb arno i oruchwylio chwaraeon gwerin gwlad. Ymddengys i mi, er y gall fod yn syniad da grwpio'r ddau sector gyda'i gilydd, yn ymarferol maen nhw'n wahanol iawn, a gall hyn achosi problemau i sefydliad fel Chwaraeon Cymru. Nawr, roedd peth tystiolaeth yn yr adolygiad annibynnol fod rhai rhanddeiliaid o'r farn bod Chwaraeon Cymru yn blaenoriaethu chwaraeon elitaidd ar draul lefel llawr gwlad. Fy nghwestiwn cyntaf oedd: o ystyried y sefyllfa honno, a oeddech chi'n dal yn credu ei bod yn ymarferol cael un sefydliad sy'n cynrychioli'r lefelau elitaidd a llawr gwlad? Rwy'n credu eich bod wedi ateb hynny, i fod yn deg, yn eich ymateb eithaf cryf i gwestiynau Russell George. Ond, o ystyried y syniad hwn gan randdeiliaid bod y flaenoriaeth yn tueddu i gael ei roi ar lefel elitaidd, sut allwn ni oresgyn hyn? A sut allwch chi sicrhau y rhoddir yr un ystyriaeth i lefel llawr gwlad â'r lefel elitaidd? Os oes anghydfodau o ran gwariant, o ran adnoddau, sut mae hynny'n cael ei ddatrys? Nawr, soniasoch yn eich ymateb i Russell fod angen inni greu llwybr i bawb at chwaraeon elitaidd. Ac oes, wrth gwrs, rhaid i'r athletwyr elitaidd ddechrau yn rhywle. Rwy'n credu, mewn gwirionedd, efallai mai'r plant fydd yn y pen draw yn cyrraedd y lefel elitaidd fydd y rhai sy'n dod o deuluoedd sydd eisoes â diddordeb brwd mewn datblygu gweithgareddau chwaraeon eu plant. Ond yr hyn y mae'n rhaid inni ei sicrhau yw ein bod yn cynyddu'r nifer sy'n manteisio ar weithgareddau corfforol cyffredin o blith gweddill y boblogaeth neu, fel y dywed rhaglen 'Symud Cymru Ymlaen' Llywodraeth Cymru, gynyddu lefelau gweithgarwch corfforol dinasyddion Cymru yn y grwpiau hynny sydd â lefelau gweithgaredd corfforol isel iawn ar hyn o bryd. Yn awr, siaradodd John Griffiths am y gweithgareddau rhedeg mewn parciau, y "park runs", a chredaf mai dyna'r math o weithgaredd yn union y dylem fod yn ei annog. Felly rwyf hefyd yn cael fy nghalonogi gan eich sylwadau cefnogol, a gobeithio, yn y dyfodol, y bydd mentrau fel y "park run", os oes angen cymorth ariannol arnyn nhw, gobeithio y gallant ei gael, er, yn achos y "park run", rwy'n tybio efallai mai'r un peth nad oes arnynt angen llawer ohono yw cymorth ariannol. Ond gyda phethau fel teithio egnïol, yn sicr bydd angen help gydag adnoddau. Mae hyn yn dod â ni at fater y gwahaniaeth rhwng chwaraeon a gweithgareddau corfforol. Mae siarter brenhinol 1972, a sefydlodd y corff a oedd yn rhagflaenu Chwaraeon Cymru, yn amlwg yn defnyddio'r term 'chwaraeon a gweithgareddau corfforol'. Ond dim ond weithiau y mae dogfennau diweddarach sy'n gysylltiedig â Chwaraeon Cymru wedi defnyddio'r ddau derm. Weithiau, maen nhw'n sôn am chwaraeon yn unig mewn cysylltiad â Chwaraeon Cymru, ond nid ydynt yn cynnwys unrhyw gyfeiriad at weithgareddau corfforol. Nawr, dywed yr adroddiad, ac rwy'n dyfynnu: Mae'r anghysondeb hwn yn ddryslyd iawn i bartneriaid Chwaraeon Cymru, a honnodd rhai ohonynt fod y sefydliad yn "newidiol" a bod diffyg pwrpas eglur. Mae yr un mor ddryslyd i staff Chwaraeon Cymru. Felly, fy nghwestiwn nesaf yw: a yw'r Gweinidog o'r farn bod staff Chwaraeon Cymru yn cael arweiniad digon clir gan eu rhiant-gorff ar beth yw eu cylch gwaith? Ac a oes angen i Lywodraeth Cymru egluro rhywfaint ar y sefyllfa? Mae mater arall hefyd, sef y bwlch rhwng chwaraeon ac iechyd. Y perygl yw y gallai'r dull hollgynhwysol adael ymdrechion gorau Chwaraeon Cymru yn disgyn yn y bwlch rhwng chwaraeon ac iechyd. Yn awr, y bwriad a nodwyd yn 2015 oedd datblygu strategaeth newydd sy'n sicrhau bod mesurau Chwaraeon Cymru yn cyd-fynd â chanllawiau gweithgarwch corfforol y prif swyddog meddygol. Fodd bynnag, gan ddyfynnu eto o'r adroddiad, er gwaethaf cyflwyno Memorandwm Cyd-ddealltwriaeth â Chydffederasiwn y GIG, ychydig iawn o gynnydd a wnaed i sefydlu llwyfan rhwng y sectorau chwaraeon ac iechyd. Yn awr, gwelaf, yn natganiad y Gweinidog heddiw, ei bod yn sôn am Chwaraeon Cymru ac Iechyd Cyhoeddus Cymru a'r syniad o gydweithio tuag at dargedau ar y cyd. Ond, dim ond i egluro'r pwynt hwnnw, a yw'r Gweinidog o'r farn bod angen i Lywodraeth Cymru roi rhagor o wybodaeth inni ynghylch sut yn union y dylai chwaraeon ac iechyd ryngweithio? A pha gorff y mae'r Gweinidog yn credu a ddylai fod yn arwain o ran ymchwilio a goruchwylio gweithgarwch corfforol - Chwaraeon Cymru neu Iechyd Cyhoeddus Cymru? Diolch.