English: Diolch, Llywydd. Before I make my final comments, I wish to acknowledge and thank the clerking team for the work they have done under pressure of time. So, I do thank them for that. And can I thank the petitioner for bringing this petition forward? It has made us scrutinise the whole procedure with regard to nuclear power dumping, and I do thank you for doing that. I also thank the organisations and agencies who provided evidence to the Petitions Committee. Lastly, can I thank the Members for their contributions to this debate? As there have been so many, I think that the best way I could deal with this is to summarise what most of the AMs have said in their contributions. They brought out the concerns with regard to the transparency of analysis procedures, and called for it to be far more transparent when these agencies are doing their work. Many also called for a pause in the proceedings and for further samples to be taken. There were also concerns about the types of radioactivity testing and, of course, Neil McEvoy was very adamant about that and, I think, very cogent in his arguments with regard to that. If I can move to the comments by the Cabinet Secretary, who acknowledged public concerns, but asserted that the tests were carried out under the rules of the International Atomic Energy Agency to the very highest standards. She asserts also that there were no scientific reasons for new tests to be carried out. To conclude, whilst I hope the committee's deliberations and today's debate have aired some of the issues raised by this petition, I recognise that nuclear power and its by-products are emotive issues. Therefore, a range of views are inevitable. This, of course, is a healthy part of a functioning democracy and, given the risks and safeguards associated with nuclear processes, the concerns that have been expressed are entirely understandable. Ultimately, we have heard that the granting of marine licences is the responsibility of Natural Resources Wales, and they have told the committee and this Assembly that they are satisfied that there is no risk to human health or the environment. As a committee, I believe we are content that all the evidence received was provided in good faith, and that the various agencies who have been involved in this process have discharged their functions according to the processes and standards required. Thank you, Dirprwy Lywydd, for the opportunity to discuss this issue today. Diolch.
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Cyn imi wneud fy sylwadau olaf, hoffwn gydnabod a diolch i'r tîm clercio am y gwaith a wnaethant o dan bwysau amser. Felly, diolch iddynt am hynny. Ac a gaf fi ddiolch i'r deisebydd am gyflwyno'r ddeiseb hon? Mae wedi gwneud i ni graffu ar y weithdrefn gyfan mewn perthynas â gwaredu deunydd o waith ynni niwclear a diolch i chi am wneud hynny. Diolch hefyd i'r sefydliadau a'r asiantaethau a ddarparodd dystiolaeth i'r Pwyllgor Deisebau. Yn olaf, a gaf fi ddiolch i'r Aelodau am eu cyfraniadau i'r ddadl hon? Gan fod cymaint wedi bod, rwy'n credu mai'r ffordd orau y gallwn ymdrin â hyn yw crynhoi'r hyn a ddywedodd y rhan fwyaf o ACau yn eu cyfraniadau. Roeddent yn mynegi'r pryderon mewn perthynas â thryloywder y gweithdrefnau dadansoddi, ac yn galw am ei wneud yn fwy tryloyw o lawer pan fo'r asiantaethau hyn yn gwneud eu gwaith. Roedd llawer hefyd yn galw am oedi pethau a chasglu samplau pellach. Roedd yna bryderon hefyd ynglŷn â'r mathau o brofion ymbelydredd ac wrth gwrs, roedd Neil McEvoy yn bendant iawn am hynny, ac yn eithaf grymus rwy'n credu yn ei ddadleuon o ran hynny. Os caf symud at y sylwadau gan Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, a oedd yn cydnabod pryderon y cyhoedd, ond a ddywedodd fod y profion wedi cael eu cynnal o dan reolau'r Asiantaeth Ynni Atomig Ryngwladol yn ôl y safonau uchaf un. Mae'n honni hefyd nad oedd unrhyw resymau gwyddonol dros gynnal profion newydd. I gloi, er y gobeithiaf fod trafodaethau'r pwyllgor a'r ddadl heddiw wedi gwyntyllu rhai o'r materion a godwyd gan y ddeiseb hon, rwy'n cydnabod bod ynni niwclear a'i sgil-gynhyrchion yn faterion emosiynol. Felly, mae amrywiaeth o safbwyntiau yn anorfod. Mae hon, wrth gwrs, yn rhan iach o ddemocratiaeth sy'n gweithio ac o ystyried y risgiau a'r mesurau diogelwch sy'n gysylltiedig â phrosesau niwclear, mae'r pryderon a fynegwyd yn gwbl ddealladwy. Yn y pen draw, rydym wedi clywed mai cyfrifoldeb Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru yw rhoi trwyddedau morol, ac maent wedi dweud wrth y pwyllgor a'r Cynulliad hwn eu bod yn fodlon nad oes unrhyw risg i iechyd dynol nac i'r amgylchedd. Fel pwyllgor, credaf ein bod yn fodlon fod yr holl dystiolaeth a gafwyd wedi'i darparu'n ddidwyll, a bod y gwahanol asiantaethau sydd wedi cymryd rhan yn y broses hon wedi cyflawni eu swyddogaethau yn ôl y prosesau a'r safonau gofynnol. Diolch ichi, Ddirprwy Lywydd, am y cyfle i drafod y mater heddiw. Diolch.