English: On your final point about a wide-ranging review of the whole structure of the health service, of course, we had an independent parliamentary review at the start of this Assembly term, and they indicated that the structure of the health service in Wales makes sense. They were very clear that they did not recommend a wide-ranging structural review and turning the apple cart upside down. It's often attractive for a politician to say the answer is to reorganise the structure of a service, and there are times when it does need to take place. But we've just had an independent review that says that is not the right thing to do. And of course we've seen the challenges in a wholesale restructure across our border, where, regardless of your view on the Lansley changes, there has been a significant amount of churn within the English system. I don't think that is something that I would recommend or be prepared to impose upon the service here in Wales. In terms of your point about whether the Welsh Government is hampering the improvement, given that we've put maternity services in the former Cwm Taf area into special measures - and the whole organisation is in targeted intervention - it would be extraordinary if there wasn't regular interaction between Welsh Government officials and the service. It's part of the point about the whole escalation status and what it means: the further up you go, the more interaction, the more oversight, the more scrutiny you can expect from Welsh Government. And if I were to say, 'Actually, I'm taking a light-touch approach to improvement', then I think Members in this place would quite rightly question what on earth I'm doing and why my officials aren't in more regular contact. We heard the exact opposite point, of course, made in Dai Lloyd's contribution. He wanted to see even greater intervention and forcing the pace more. I've been really clear about the approach we're taking - I think it's the right one. So, those weekly calls will continue until we're clear that the service is on a more sustained improvement trajectory. On neighbouring health boards and support, it's true that neighbouring health boards are supporting the service in Cwm Taf Morgannwg. The heads of midwifery meet as a group and they look at service issues in a very collective way. That's been really positive - and the proactive offers of help that have been provided, and the way in which recruitment issues have been dealt with around the service, to try to make sure that the service wasn't capsized by taking people out of the Cwm Taf area. But more broadly, it's about supporting people to make their choices, because some people have made a choice, saying they don't wish to attend a birth centre in the former Cwm Taf area, and that choice has been made available to them. It's important that people are supported in making those choices and start that conversation with their local community midwife. But that's been important in the way that neighbouring services have happened. Bridgend is not in the same position as the former Cwm Taf area, it is not in special measures for the maternity service there. We've had a recent interaction with Healthcare Inspectorate Wales; there has been no suggestion that that's a required action for that part of the Cwm Taf Morgannwg area. So, I want to provide that reassurance to people who are going to give birth in the Bridgend area - they do not need to have any concerns on the level of improvement that is required in the former Cwm Taf area. But of course, every part of our service has the opportunity to reconsider what's happened, to reconsider what improvement it could still make in its own services.
Welsh: Ynghylch y pwynt olaf a wnaethoch chi am adolygiad cynhwysfawr o strwythur cyfan y gwasanaeth iechyd, wrth gwrs, cawsom adolygiad seneddol annibynnol ar ddechrau'r tymor Cynulliad hwn, ac fe wnaethon nhw ddangos bod strwythur y gwasanaeth iechyd yng Nghymru'n gwneud synnwyr. Roedden nhw'n glir iawn nad oedden nhw'n argymell adolygiad strwythurol eang a throi'r drol. Mae'n aml yn ddeniadol i wleidydd ddweud mai'r ateb yw ad-drefnu strwythur gwasanaeth, ac mae yna adegau pan fo angen gwneud hynny. Ond rydym ni newydd gael adolygiad annibynnol sy'n dweud nad dyna'r peth iawn i'w wneud. Ac wrth gwrs rydym ni wedi gweld yr heriau mewn ailstrwythuro cynhwysfawr ar draws y ffin, lle, beth bynnag fo'ch barn am newidiadau Lansley, bu cryn dipyn o newid yn y system yn Lloegr. Nid wyf yn credu bod hynny'n rhywbeth y byddwn i'n ei argymell neu'n barod i'w orfodi ar y gwasanaeth yma yng Nghymru. O ran eich pwynt ynghylch a yw Llywodraeth Cymru yn llesteirio'r gwelliant, o gofio ein bod wedi gwneud gwasanaethau mamolaeth yn hen ardal Cwm Taf yn destun mesurau arbennig - ac mae'r sefydliad cyfan yn destun ymyrraeth wedi'i dargedu - byddai'n rhyfeddol pe na bai rhyngweithio rheolaidd rhwng swyddogion Llywodraeth Cymru a'r gwasanaeth. Mae'n rhan o ddiben yr holl statws uwchgyfeirio a'r hyn y mae'n ei olygu: po uchaf yr ewch chi, po fwyaf y rhyngweithio, po fwyaf yr oruchwyliaeth, y mwyaf o graffu y gallwch ei ddisgwyl gan Lywodraeth Cymru. A phe bawn i'n dweud, 'Mewn gwirionedd, ni fyddaf yn llym iawn o ran gwella', yna rwy'n credu y byddai aelodau yn y fan yma yn cwestiynu'n briodol beth ar y ddaear rwy'n ei wneud a pham nad yw fy swyddogion yn cysylltu'n fwy rheolaidd. Clywsom y sylw a wnaed i'r gwrthwyneb yn llwyr, wrth gwrs, yng nghyfraniad Dai Lloyd. Roedd yntau eisiau gweld hyd yn oed mwy o ymyrryd a gwthio hynny ynghynt. Rwyf wedi bod yn glir iawn ynglŷn â sut yr ydym ni'n mynd ati - rwy'n credu mai dyma'r ffordd gywir. Felly, bydd y galwadau wythnosol hynny'n parhau nes ein bod yn glir bod y gwasanaeth yn gwella'n fwy cyson. O ran byrddau iechyd cyfagos a chymorth, mae'n wir fod byrddau iechyd cyfagos yn cefnogi'r gwasanaeth yng Nghwm Taf Morgannwg. Mae penaethiaid bydwreigiaeth yn cyfarfod fel grŵp ac maen nhw'n edrych ar faterion o ran gwasanaeth mewn ffordd gyfunol iawn. Bu hynny'n gadarnhaol iawn - a'r cynigion rhagweithiol o gymorth sydd wedi'u darparu, a'r ffordd y mae materion recriwtio wedi cael eu trin o amgylch y gwasanaeth, i geisio sicrhau nad oedd tarfu ar y gwasanaeth drwy dynnu pobl allan o ardal Cwm Taf. Ond yn fwy cyffredinol, mae'n ymwneud â chefnogi pobl i wneud eu dewisiadau, oherwydd bod rhai pobl wedi gwneud dewis, gan ddweud nad ydyn nhw'n dymuno mynd i ganolfan eni yn hen ardal Cwm Taf, a rhoddwyd y dewis hwnnw iddyn nhw. Mae'n bwysig bod pobl yn cael eu cynorthwyo i wneud y dewisiadau hynny a dechrau'r sgwrs honno gyda'u bydwraig gymunedol leol. Ond bu hynny'n bwysig gyda gwasanaethau cyfagos. Nid yw Pen-y-bont ar Ogwr yn yr un sefyllfa â hen ardal Cwm Taf, nid yw'r gwasanaeth mamolaeth yn y fan yna yn destun mesurau arbennig. Rydym ni wedi rhyngweithio'n ddiweddar ag Arolygiaeth Gofal Iechyd Cymru; ni chafwyd unrhyw awgrym bod hynny'n weithred ofynnol ar gyfer y rhan honno o ardal Cwm Taf Morgannwg. Felly, rwyf eisiau rhoi'r sicrwydd hwnnw i bobl sy'n mynd i roi genedigaeth yn ardal Pen-y-bont ar Ogwr - nid oes angen iddyn nhw fod ag unrhyw bryderon ynglŷn â faint o welliant sy'n ofynnol yn hen ardal Cwm Taf. Ond wrth gwrs, mae pob rhan o'n gwasanaeth yn cael cyfle i ailystyried yr hyn sydd wedi digwydd, i ailystyried pa welliannau y gallai hi barhau i'w gwneud yn ei gwasanaethau ei hun.