English: I'm getting a bit fed up with standing up here talking about public bodies, sporting bodies, police, the fire, and talking about the culture that is underpinning them, of a systematic culture of misogyny, sexism in traditionally male-dominated areas. I'm getting a little bit tired of this. The WRU has said it 'condemns the use of racist, homophobic or sexist language'. Well, prove it. Because they haven't proved it, and neither have all the other organisations proved it yet. So, I've got to say, I found its statement, in response to the allegations, arrogant and dismissive. I thought that they minimised and they were gaslighting, in a way that many women here will recognise today. Particularly dismissive was the WRU's response to my colleague Tonia Antoniazzi's comment, and the Gower MP rightly suggested an independent body be established to look at those complaints against sporting governing bodies in Wales. If we look at the fact that she mentioned racism in cricket, and we've seen that play out; if we look at British Gymnastics, and we've seen that play out, how many Ministers are going to stand up here and explain what these public bodies aren't doing, because that's the question here? So, I think what we need to do is go a little bit further here. The structures are clearly not working, the people who have overall responsibility say they didn't know what was happening at the bottom of their organisation. They hadn't had a conversation. Well, they should have. So, we need to ensure, in public-sponsored bodies, with public money, that those structures are sufficient enough to do two things: one, to make sure that all parts of that organisation know what's happening in the other parts of that organisation; and the other thing is safe passage for whistleblowers, because that is the other really important thing here, and also to vet those people who are going to take part in those organisations and also the people who oversee it. I don't want to be standing up here next week, and I'm sure nobody else does, when we get another story that's breaking and another story. So, let's just really get a hold of this because this is a disgrace to Wales - an absolute disgrace to Wales. And, you know, what will it be next week? And to say that they can't publish a report because they have given, rightly, an opportunity for people not to be named in that report, is just a disgrace, because they know full well that they could publish that report by simply removing those names. So, they're hiding behind it again. I actually think we need a root-and-branch change of those people who were in charge of the WRU by their performance so far.
Welsh: Rwyf wedi cael llond bol ar sefyll yma'n siarad am gyrff cyhoeddus, cyrff chwaraeon, yr heddlu, y gwasanaeth tân, ac yn sôn am y diwylliant sy'n sail iddynt, am ddiwylliant systemig o gasineb at fenywod a rhywiaeth mewn meysydd sydd wedi eu dominyddu, yn draddodiadol, gan ddynion. Rwy'n blino braidd ar hyn. Mae Undeb Rygbi Cymru wedi dweud eu bod 'yn condemnio'r defnydd o iaith hiliol, homoffobig neu rywiaethol'. Wel, profwch hynny. Oherwydd nid ydynt wedi'i brofi, ac nid yw'r holl sefydliadau eraill wedi'i brofi eto. Felly, mae'n rhaid imi ddweud fy mod yn credu bod eu datganiad mewn ymateb i'r honiadau yn drahaus ac yn ddiystyriol. Roeddwn o'r farn eu bod yn lleihau ac yn dibwyllo, mewn ffordd y bydd llawer o fenywod yma heddiw yn ei hadnabod. Roedd ymateb Undeb Rygbi Cymru i sylw fy nghyd-bleidiwr, Tonia Antoniazzi, yn arbennig o ddiystyriol ac awgrymodd AS Gŵyr, yn gwbl briodol, y dylid sefydlu corff annibynnol i edrych ar y cwynion yn erbyn cyrff llywodraethu chwaraeon yng Nghymru. Os edrychwn ar y ffaith ei bod wedi sôn am hiliaeth mewn criced, ac rydym wedi gweld yr hyn a ddigwyddodd gyda hynny; os edrychwn ar Gymnasteg Prydain, ac rydym wedi gweld yr hyn a ddigwyddodd gyda hynny, faint o Weinidogion sy'n mynd i godi yma ac egluro'r hyn nad yw'r cyrff cyhoeddus hyn yn ei wneud, gan mai dyma'r cwestiwn yma? Felly, credaf mai'r hyn y mae angen inni ei wneud yw mynd gam ymhellach yma. Mae'n amlwg nad yw'r strwythurau'n gweithio, mae'r bobl sydd â'r cyfrifoldeb cyffredinol yn dweud nad oeddent yn gwybod beth oedd yn digwydd ar waelod eu sefydliad. Nid oeddent wedi cael sgwrs. Wel, dylent fod wedi cael un. Felly, mae angen inni sicrhau, mewn cyrff sy'n cael arian cyhoeddus, fod y strwythurau hynny'n ddigonol i wneud dau beth: un, sicrhau bod pob rhan o'r sefydliad hwnnw'n gwybod beth sy'n digwydd yn rhannau eraill y sefydliad hwnnw; a'r llall yw llwybr diogel i chwythwyr chwiban, gan mai dyna'r peth arall sy'n wirioneddol bwysig yma, yn ogystal â fetio'r bobl sy'n mynd i fod yn rhan o'r sefydliadau hynny a'r bobl sy'n eu goruchwylio. Nid wyf am orfod codi yma yr wythnos nesaf, ac rwy'n siŵr nad oes unrhyw arall ychwaith, pan fydd stori arall yn torri, a stori arall. Felly, gadewch inni fynd i'r afael â'r sefyllfa hon yn iawn, gan fod hyn yn destun cywilydd i Gymru - yn destun cywilydd mawr i Gymru. A beth fydd y stori yr wythnos nesaf? Ac mae dweud na allant gyhoeddi adroddiad am eu bod wedi rhoi cyfle, yn briodol, i bobl beidio â chael eu henwi yn yr adroddiad yn warthus, gan eu bod yn gwybod yn iawn y gallent gyhoeddi'r adroddiad hwnnw drwy ddileu'r enwau. Felly, maent yn cuddio y tu ôl i hynny eto. Credaf fod angen newid y bobl a oedd yn gyfrifol am Undeb Rygbi Cymru yn llwyr yn ôl eu perfformiad hyd yma.