English: First Minister, my colleagues at Westminster are meeting with Jeremy Corbyn as we speak, in order to explore cross-party co-operation in achieving, even at this late stage, a collaborative approach. We hope greater clarity will emerge about Labour's real position on Brexit. Last week, BBC Wales reported that a senior source inside the Welsh Labour Party - who may or may not be sitting, who knows, on your frontbenches - said that your lack of clarity over a people's vote was causing tensions in your Cabinet. They called your policy unsustainable and confusing. Your own AM - Torfaen's Lynne Neagle - described your position as ridiculous and unconvincing. Now, in your statement today, you said a second referendum would be divisive, possibly indecisive, though you would support it subsequently, if the House of Commons did first. It's difficult to conceive of a weaker endorsement of the case for a second referendum. You're rowing further and further away, First Minister, from the policy that we endorsed in this place in January, so much so that, if, miraculously, Jeremy Corbyn u-turns again, adopts a policy of a people's vote, following his meeting with Plaid Cymru this afternoon, you'll end up actually passing each other, facing opposite directions, like sinking ships in the night. And then there's the question, First Minister, if another referendum were to happen, which way would you and the Labour Party campaign and vote? Interviewed by Sky News on Sunday, Jeremy Corbyn seemed, finally, to come off the fence. And then he got back on it. First, he conceded that there should be another referendum, on what he termed a credible deal to leave the European Union, by which he meant a deal negotiated by Labour to set up a new customs union and close alignment with the single market, and an option to remain in the EU. When he was pressed as to how he would vote in such a referendum, he answered that it was his preference to recognise the result of the 2016 referendum. Obfuscation is dead, long live obfuscation. What did he mean by that? First Minister, perhaps you can tell us here now. My colleagues in Westminster will certainly be asking him. But your statement today suggests that it's your preference too to secure your version of Brexit over a 'remain' result in any future referendum. Finally, can I turn to the analysis for your Government by King's College London Professor Jonathan Portes, which has found that Wales will be harder hit than the rest of the UK by the proposed £30,000 minimum salary for skilled migrants who look to come to the UK from 2021? He said that, while average full-time earnings for the UK as a whole are not far off £30,000, in Wales they are significantly below that. Consequently, they would be a huge barrier to Welsh businesses seeking skilled professionals from abroad. He recommended a £20,000 minimum salary to apply to Wales. So far, the Welsh Government - as far as I've been able to find out - hasn't expressed a view about the results of its own research. So, First Minister, do you agree with Professor Portes, and, if so, what are you doing to persuade the UK Government to take his recommendations on board?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, mae fy nghyd-Aelodau yn San Steffan yn cyfarfod â Jeremy Corbyn wrth inni siarad, er mwyn ystyried cydweithredu trawsbleidiol i sicrhau, hyd yn oed ar yr adeg hwyr hon, dull cydweithredol. Rydym ni'n gobeithio y daw mwy o eglurder ynghylch safbwynt gwirioneddol y Blaid Lafur ar Brexit. Yr wythnos diwethaf, nododd BBC Cymru fod uwch-aelod ym Mhlaid Lafur Cymru - sydd naill ai'n eistedd neu beidio, pwy a ŵyr, ar eich meinciau blaen - wedi dweud bod eich diffyg eglurder dros bleidlais y bobl yn achosi tensiynau yn eich Cabinet. Fe wnaethon nhw alw eich polisi yn anghynaliadwy ac yn ddryslyd. Disgrifiodd eich Aelod Cynulliad eich hun - Lynne Neagle, Torfaen - eich sefyllfa fel un chwerthinllyd ac un nad yw'n argyhoeddi. Nawr, yn eich datganiad heddiw, fe wnaethoch chi ddweud y byddai ail refferendwm yn rhannu pobl, o bosib yn amhendant, ond y byddech chi'n cefnogi hynny wedyn, os byddai Tŷ'r Cyffredin yn gwneud hynny'n gyntaf. Mae'n anodd dychmygu cymeradwyaeth wannach o'r achos dros ail refferendwm. Rydych chi'n rhwyfo ymhellach ac ymhellach i ffwrdd, Prif Weinidog, o'r polisi a gymeradwywyd gennym ni yn y lle hwn ym mis Ionawr, cymaint felly, petai Jeremy Corbyn, yn wyrthiol, yn gwneud tro pedol eto, ac yn mabwysiadu polisi o roi pleidlais i'r bobl, yn dilyn ei gyfarfod â Phlaid Cymru y prynhawn yma, fe fyddech chi mewn gwirionedd yn pasio eich gilydd, yn wynebu cyfeiriadau cyferbyniol, fel llongau yn suddo yn y nos. Ac yna dyna'r cwestiwn, Prif Weinidog, pe byddai refferendwm arall, sut fyddech chi a'r Blaid Lafur yn ymgyrchu ac yn pleidleisio? Pan gafodd ei gyfweld gan Sky News ddydd Sul, roedd yn ymddangos bod Jeremy Corbyn, o'r diwedd, yn cymryd agwedd bendant. Ac yna peidiodd. Yn gyntaf, cyfaddefodd y dylid cael refferendwm arall, ar yr hyn a alwodd yn gytundeb credadwy i adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, sef yr hyn a olygai oedd cytundeb gan y Blaid Lafur i sefydlu undeb tollau newydd a pherthynas agos â'r farchnad sengl, a dewis i aros yn yr UE. Pan bwyswyd arno ynghylch sut fyddai'n pleidleisio mewn refferendwm o'r fath, atebodd y byddai'n well ganddo gydnabod canlyniad refferendwm 2016. Dyna ben ar niwlogrwydd, hir oes i niwlogrwydd. Beth oedd yn ei olygu wrth hynny? Prif Weinidog, efallai y gallwch chi ddweud wrthym ni yma nawr. Bydd fy nghyd-Aelodau yn San Steffan yn sicr yn gofyn iddo. Ond mae eich datganiad heddiw yn awgrymu mai eich dewis chi hefyd yw sicrhau eich fersiwn chi o Brexit dros ganlyniad 'aros' mewn unrhyw refferendwm yn y dyfodol. Yn olaf, a gaf i droi at y dadansoddiad ar gyfer eich Llywodraeth gan yr Athro Jonathan Portes o Goleg y Brenin, Llundain, sydd wedi canfod y caiff Cymru ei tharo'n galetach na gweddill y DU gan yr isafswm cyflog arfaethedig o £30,000 ar gyfer ymfudwyr medrus sy'n bwriadu dod i'r DU o 2021? Dywedodd, er nad yw enillion llawn amser cyfartalog ar gyfer y DU yn ei chyfanrwydd ymhell o £30,000, eu bod nhw yng Nghymru yn sylweddol is na hynny. O ganlyniad, byddent yn rhwystr enfawr i fusnesau yng Nghymru sy'n chwilio am weithwyr proffesiynol medrus o dramor. Argymhellodd bennu isafswm cyflog o £20,000 i Gymru. Hyd yma, nid yw Llywodraeth Cymru - i'r graddau yr wyf i wedi llwyddo i'w ddarganfod - wedi mynegi barn ynghylch canlyniadau ei hymchwil ei hun. Felly, Prif Weinidog, a ydych chi'n cytuno gyda'r Athro Portes, ac, os felly, beth ydych chi'n ei wneud i ddarbwyllo Llywodraeth y DU i ystyried ei argymhellion?