techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. This debate takes place during a time of absolute chaos brought about by the UK Government's handling of Brexit. Parliament is gridlocked, and the election of a new Conservative leader means the prospect of a catastrophic 'no deal' Brexit is very real. We're likely to face a straight choice between a 'no deal' Brexit or remaining in the EU. Faced with this prospect, we will campaign to remain in the EU and believe that Parliament must legislate as soon as possible for a referendum to decide on this issue. The chaos being inflicted by the UK Government also extends to the lack of clarity on how the vital £370 million a year of EU structural and investment funds in Wales will be replaced. Over the last two decades, EU funding has helped to bring new and better jobs to Wales, and given people the skills to do them. Twenty years ago, Wales had some of the highest levels of worklessness in the UK. Over the last 12 months, unemployment and economic inactivity have been at record lows and better than most parts of the UK. EU funds have supported the creation of 48,000 new jobs and 13,000 new businesses. They've assisted 25,000 businesses with funding or support, and helped 86,000 people into employment. Over 300,000 new qualifications have been delivered.
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Mae'r ddadl hon yn cael ei chynnal yn ystod cyfnod o anhrefn lwyr yn sgil y ffordd y mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi ymwneud â Brexit. Nid yw'r Senedd yn gallu gweithredu, ac mae ethol arweinydd Ceidwadol newydd yn golygu bod posibilrwydd Brexit 'dim cytundeb' trychinebus yn fyw iawn. Rydym ni'n debygol o wynebu dewis syml rhwng Brexit 'dim cytundeb' neu aros yn yr UE. Wrth wynebu'r posibilrwydd hwn, byddwn ni'n ymgyrchu i aros yn yr UE ac rydym ni o'r farn bod yn rhaid i'r Senedd ddeddfu cyn gynted ag sy'n bosibl i gynnal refferendwm i benderfynu ar y mater hwn. Mae'r anrhefn sy'n cael ei hachosi gan Lywodraeth y DU hefyd yn ymestyn i'r diffyg eglurder o ran sut y bydd y £370 miliwn hanfodol y flwyddyn o gronfeydd strwythurol a buddsoddi'r UE yng Nghymru yn cael ei ddisodli. Yn ystod y ddau ddegawd diwethaf, mae cyllid yr UE wedi helpu i ddod â swyddi newydd a gwell i Gymru, ac mae wedi rhoi'r sgiliau i bobl eu gwneud. Ugain mlynedd yn ôl, roedd gan Gymru rai o'r lefelau uchaf o fod heb waith yn y DU. Yn ystod y 12 mis diwethaf, mae diweithdra ac anweithgarwch economaidd wedi bod ar eu hisaf erioed ac yn well na'r rhan fwyaf o rannau'r DU. Mae cronfeydd yr UE wedi rhoi cefnogaeth i greu 48,000 o swyddi newydd a 13,000 o fusnesau newydd. Maen nhw wedi helpu 25,000 o fusnesau gyda chyllid neu gymorth, ac wedi helpu 86,000 o bobl i gael gwaith. Mae dros 300,000 o gymwysterau newydd wedi eu darparu.
English: Thank you for taking the intervention. In that case, why is it that you're proposing to reject paragraph 3 of the motion, which basically says to reject, 'the idea of a centralised UK-directed fund or one which seeks to bypass the devolved administration', because, effectively, you just said that you actually totally agree with that? So, why are you rejecting it?
Welsh: Diolch am dderbyn yr ymyriad. Felly, pam ydych chi'n cynnig gwrthod paragraff 3 y cynnig, sy'n dweud yn y bôn y dylid gwrthod y syniad o gronfa ganolog a gyfarwyddir gan y DU neu un sy'n ceisio osgoi'r weinyddiaeth ddatganoledig, oherwydd, i bob pwrpas, yr ydych chi newydd ddweud eich bod yn cytuno'n llwyr â hynny? Felly, pam ydych chi'n ei wrthod?
English: Thank you for giving way, Nick. If I'm listening accurately to what you're saying, you are actually supporting at least the principle behind points No. 2 and No. 3, but you don't like the tone. The principle of No. is 2 about the lack of detail you've just spoken about more eloquently than I can; you also regret the lack of detail. And you do reject the idea of a centralised or UK-directed fund; you want it to be directed from here in Wales. So, can I just at least get clarity on the record that whilst you may not like the tone of something in here, you do accept the principle of the Government's motion?
Welsh: Diolch am ildio, Nick. Os ydw i'n gwrando'n iawn ar yr hyn yr ydych chi'n ei ddweud, rydych chi'n cefnogi o leiaf yr egwyddor y tu ôl i bwyntiau rhif 2 a rhif 3, ond dydych chi ddim yn hoffi'r tôn. Mae egwyddor rhif 2 ynghylch y diffyg manylder yr ydych chi newydd sôn amdano yn fwy huawdl nag y gallaf i; rydych chi hefyd yn gresynu at y diffyg manylion. Ac rydych chi'n gwrthod y syniad o gronfa wedi'i chanoli neu o dan gyfarwyddyd y DU; rydych chi eisiau iddi gael ei rheoli yma yng Nghymru. Felly, a gaf i o leiaf gael eglurder ar y cofnod, er nad ydych chi o bosibl yn hoffi tôn rhywbeth yn y fan yma, eich bod yn derbyn egwyddor cynnig y Llywodraeth?
English: First of all, yes, there is a tone issue. With regard to point 2, it says, 'Regrets the lack of detail from the UK Government'. I've already said we want to see more detail, and that will be forthcoming. Okay. Leaving that aside, point 3 'Rejects the idea of a centralised or UK-directed fund or one which seeks to bypass the devolved administrations post-Brexit.' We do not accept that there is an attempt to bypass. It's the language - you might say tone - that is unacceptable to us, because it is weighting the debate in a certain direction that we feel is not acceptable. And it would have been far better had we all agreed on the language of this motion, so that then we could have all accepted it. But point 4 is retained. [ Interruption.] If I've got time, I will give way. I think they are making an important point, but it's a matter for the Llywydd.
Welsh: Yn gyntaf oll, oes, mae yna broblem yn ymwneud â thôn. O ran pwynt 2, mae'n dweud: 'Yn gresynu at ddiffyg manylder Lywodraeth y DU'. Rwyf eisoes wedi dweud ein bod eisiau gweld mwy o fanylion, a bydd hynny'n dod yn fuan. Iawn. Gan adael hynny i'r naill ochr, mae pwynt 3: 'Yn gwrthod y syniad o gronfa ganolog neu gronfa dan gyfarwyddyd y DU neu un sy'n ceisio osgoi'r gweinyddiaethau datganoledig ar ôl Brexit.' Nid ydym ni'n derbyn bod ymgais i osgoi. Yr iaith - efallai y byddech yn dweud y tôn - sy'n annerbyniol i ni, gan ei bod yn pwysoli'r ddadl i ryw gyfeiriad nad yw'n dderbyniol yn ein barn ni. A byddai wedi bod yn llawer gwell pe byddem ni i gyd wedi cytuno ar iaith y cynnig hwn, fel y gallem ni i gyd fod wedi ei dderbyn. Ond cedwir pwynt 4. [ Torri ar draws.] Os oes gen i amser, fe wnaf i ildio. Rwy'n credu eu bod yn gwneud pwynt pwysig, ond mae'n fater i'r Llywydd.
English: Indeed, and I welcome you giving way because it helps the debate.
Welsh: Yn wir, ac rwyf yn croesawu eich bod chi'n ildio am fod hynny'n helpu'r ddadl.
English: All I can say is the more interventions happen, the less likely some people are to be called later on in the debate.
Welsh: Y cyfan y gallaf i ei ddweud yw po fwyaf o ymyriadau sy'n digwydd, y llai tebygol y bydd rhai pobl yn cael eu galw yn nes ymlaen yn y ddadl.
English: And if I suffer, I'll accept it, Llywydd. It's simply to say you don't accept the idea that the UK Government in No. 3 is trying to avoid that. But the idea of a centralised or UK-directed fund, rejecting that - do you accept rejecting that?
Welsh: Ac os bydda i'n dioddef, byddaf i'n derbyn hynny, Llywydd. Y cyfan y mae'n ei wneud yw dweud nad ydych chi'n derbyn y syniad bod Llywodraeth y DU yn rhif 3 yn ceisio osgoi hynny. Ond y syniad o gronfa wedi'i chanoli neu o dan gyfarwyddyd y DU, gwrthod hynny - a ydych chi'n derbyn bod hynny'n cael ei wrthod?
English: Just to be totally clear about this, I believe that point 3, and we believe that point 3, suggests that the UK Government is deliberately trying to bypass to claw back powers, which it is not. That that might actually - [ Interruption.] That that result might actually be an unseen consequence longer down the line is something we can discuss, which is why I think point 4 is far more effective at making the point, but I don't think point 3 does. I realise I'm virtually out of time, so if I can just finish off. I totally agree - the 'leave' campaign are very vocal over there - with the 'leave' campaign's comments from before the referendum that Wales should not be a penny worse off after all this is done and dusted. Let's hope that that does actually turn out to be the case and it wasn't just words. I appreciate that there are some understandable reasons why we have this current confusion, but I think if we all work together here then we can deliver a message to the UK Government that I think we all find acceptable, and that will say that Wales does want to have autonomy, control and financial accountability here, and does not want to see that lost to the UK.
Welsh: I fod yn gwbl glir ynglŷn â hyn, rwyf i'n credu bod pwynt 3, ac rydym ni'n credu bod pwynt 3, yn awgrymu bod Llywodraeth y DU yn ceisio osgoi yn fwriadol er mwyn tynnu pwerau yn ôl, rhywbeth nad ydyw'n ei wneud. Mae'r ffaith y gallai hynny - [ Torri ar draws.] Mae'r ffaith y gallai'r canlyniad hwnnw fod yn ganlyniad anweledig ymhellach i lawr y ffordd yn rhywbeth y gallwn ni ei drafod, a dyna pam rwy'n credu bod pwynt 4 yn fwy effeithiol o lawer wrth wneud y pwynt, ond nid wyf i'n credu bod pwynt 3 yn gwneud hynny Rwy'n sylweddoli bod fy amser i bron ar ben, felly os caf i orffen. Rwyf yn cytuno'n llwyr - mae'r ymgyrch 'gadael' yn llafar iawn draw yn y fan yna - gyda sylwadau'r ymgyrch 'gadael' cyn y refferendwm na ddylai Cymru fod yr un geiniog ar ei cholled ar ôl i hyn i gyd fynd heibio. Gobeithio mai dyna fydd yn digwydd mewn gwirionedd, ac nid geiriau'n unig ydoedd hynny. Rwyf yn gwerthfawrogi bod rhai rhesymau dealladwy pam mae gennym ni'r dryswch presennol hwn, ond credaf os byddwn i gyd yn cydweithio yma y gallwn ni gyflwyno neges i Lywodraeth y DU sydd, yn fy marn i, yn dderbyniol i bob un ohonom, a bydd hynny'n dweud bod Cymru eisiau cael ymreolaeth ac atebolrwydd ariannol yn y fan yma, ac nad yw eisiau gweld hynny'n cael ei golli i'r DU.
English: Talk about the shared prosperity fund.
Welsh: Siaradwch am y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin.
English: The evidence now is clear. The risk is clear that Whitehall will just repeat its traditional formula of distribution of economic development funding. And look at what the figures published yesterday by the Communities in Charge organisation tell us about what that would mean. One of the campaign's organisers said it will be like handing every Londoner a cheque for over £200 and taking £700 from every Welsh person. Wales could lose over £2.3 billion over six years, with money flowing to the prosperous south-east of England. Now, rather than reduce inequalities, a business-as-usual UK Government would only increase the inequality between the regions of the UK and the nations of the UK. This is the Brexit reality, this is what faces Wales, and that's without taking into account the damage that would flow from the economic disaster of a 'no deal' Brexit.
Welsh: Mae'r dystiolaeth yn glir erbyn hyn. Mae'r risg yn amlwg y bydd Whitehall ddim ond yn ailadrodd ei fformiwla arferol o ddosbarthu arian datblygu economaidd. Ac edrychwch ar yr hyn y mae'r ffigurau a gyhoeddwyd ddoe gan y mudiad Communities in Charge yn ei ddweud wrthym am yr hyn y byddai hynny'n ei olygu. Dywedodd un o drefnwyr yr ymgyrch y byddai'n debyg i roi siec am dros £200 i bob un o drigolion Llundain a chymryd £700 oddi wrth bob person yng Nghymru. Mae'n bosibl y gallai Cymru golli dros £2.3 biliwn dros chwe blynedd, gydag arian yn llifo i dde-ddwyrain ffyniannus Lloegr. Felly, yn hytrach na lleihau anghydraddoldeb, byddai Llywodraeth busnes fel arfer y DU ddim ond yn cynyddu'r anghydraddoldeb rhwng rhanbarthau'r DU a gwledydd y DU. Dyma yw realiti Brexit, dyma sy'n wynebu Cymru, a hynny heb gymryd i ystyriaeth y difrod a fyddai'n llifo o drychineb economaidd Brexit 'dim cytundeb'.
English: I do want to support the Government motion, so I hoped I'd be able to make consensual comments, but I do have to say at the beginning that the Minister said that she wants to see promises from the 2016 referendum honoured. Yes, and how about we start by honouring the result of the referendum? She spoke about wanting to see legislation brought in for a referendum on our membership of the European Union, without drawing attention to the fact that we have had one. Wales voted to leave, and the problem is that she and the cohorts behind her think they know better than the people who, in the main, elect them, and don't want to implement the result. That is all there is to that point. The issues - [I nterruption.] The issues we face - [ Interruption.]
Welsh: Rwyf eisiau cefnogi cynnig y Llywodraeth, felly roeddwn i'n gobeithio y gallwn i wneud sylwadau cydsyniol, ond mae'n rhaid imi ddweud ar y dechrau bod y Gweinidog wedi dweud ei bod hi eisiau gweld addewidion o refferendwm 2016 yn cael eu hanrhydeddu. Iawn, a beth am inni ddechrau drwy anrhydeddu canlyniad y refferendwm? Soniodd hi ei bod hi eisiau gweld deddfwriaeth yn cael ei chyflwyno i gynnal refferendwm ar ein haelodaeth o'r Undeb Ewropeaidd, heb dynnu sylw at y ffaith ein bod ni wedi cynnal un. Pleidleisiodd Cymru i adael, a'r broblem yw ei bod hi a'r carfannau y tu ôl iddi yn credu eu bod yn gwybod yn well na'r bobl sydd, ar y cyfan, yn eu hethol nhw, ac nid ydyn nhw eisiau gweithredu'r canlyniad. Dyna'r cwbl sydd ar y pwynt hwnnw. Mae'r materion - [ Torri ar draws.] Mae'r materion yr ydym ni'n eu hwynebu - [ Torri ar draws.]
English: Can we allow the Member to continue with his contributions in some silence, please?
Welsh: A gawn ni ganiatáu i'r Aelod barhau â'i gyfraniadau mewn tawelwch, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: Thank you for taking an intervention. I must say I see it as another symptom about the lack of clarity about the direction of travel in which we're heading. One of the big issues that I have about the referendum in 2016 is that we still do not know what people voted for. You might have an idea; others in this room might have an idea. Again, after three years of failing to reach a conclusion on that, neither have we, after three years, reached a conclusion about how a shared prosperity fund could work.
Welsh: Diolch am dderbyn ymyriad. Mae'n rhaid imi ddweud fy mod i'n ei weld fel symptom arall o'r diffyg eglurder ynghylch y cyfeiriad yr ydym yn mynd iddo. Un o'r materion mawr i mi ynglŷn â'r refferendwm yn 2016 yw nad ydym ni'n gwybod o hyd beth y pleidleisiodd pobl drosto. Efallai fod gennych chi syniad; efallai y bydd gan bobl eraill yn yr ystafell hon syniad. Unwaith eto, ar ôl tair blynedd o fethu â dod i gasgliad ynglŷn â hynny, nid ydym ni ychwaith, ar ôl tair blynedd, wedi dod i gasgliad ynglŷn â sut y gallai cronfa ffyniant gyffredin weithio.
English: I thank the Member for taking an intervention. Just to clarify: my colleague Stephen Kinnock, who is my constituency MP as you pointed out, the APPG actually has cross-party membership - the SNP, Conservatives, various groups - and it is therefore a collective view, it's not just simply his view, and it is a view also of academics who have put in the research into the report. This is based upon academic research, and therefore clearly the report highlights the concerns that they have.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am dderbyn ymyriad. Er mwyn egluro: o ran fy ngyd-gynrychiolydd Stephen Kinnock, sef AS fy etholaeth i, fel y gwnaethoch ei nodi, mae gan y grŵp hollbleidiol seneddol aelodaeth drawsbleidiol - yr SNP, y Ceidwadwyr, grwpiau amrywiol - ac felly barn dorfol ydyw, nid ei farn ef yn unig, ac mae hefyd yn farn academyddion sydd wedi cyfrannu ymchwil at yr adroddiad. Mae hyn yn seiliedig ar ymchwil academaidd, ac felly mae'n amlwg bod yr adroddiad yn tynnu sylw at y pryderon sydd ganddynt.
English: Good. Well, I wish it well and congratulate Stephen Kinnock on the work he's doing here, and also on the constancy of his position on Brexit. Unlike Members here, he hasn't changed it, and that I do welcome. I encourage the Conservative side as well, I hope, to link in to this APPG, to think where they can influence the debate as it's happening. There is a leadership contest. People are discussing issues. Let's try and make sure that UK Government policy links in with the Welsh Government policy on our getting the money that was promised. I'm disappointed that the Conservatives are not supporting this motion today, because point 3, to me, I think, is actually well phrased. We don't want a centralised or UK-directed fund; we want one over which we have more influence than we did when it was run by the EU. We don't want to bypass the devolved administrations; we want to try and agree something that works for Wales and for the United Kingdom. I look forward to supporting the motion.
Welsh: Da iawn. Wel, rwy'n dymuno'n dda iddo ac rwy'n llongyfarch Stephen Kinnock ar y gwaith y mae'n ei wneud yma, a hefyd ar gysondeb ei safbwynt ar Brexit. Yn wahanol i'r Aelodau yma, nid yw ef wedi ei newid, ac rwy'n croesawu hynny. Rwy'n annog y Ceidwadwyr hefyd, gobeithio, i gysylltu â'r grŵp hollbleidiol seneddol hwn, i ystyried ble y gallan nhw ddylanwadu ar y ddadl fel y mae'n digwydd. Mae yna ornest am yr arweinyddiaeth. Mae pobl yn trafod materion. Beth am geisio gwneud yn siŵr bod polisi Llywodraeth y DU yn cysylltu â pholisi Llywodraeth Cymru ynglŷn â chael yr arian a addawyd? Rwy'n siomedig nad yw'r Ceidwadwyr yn cefnogi'r cynnig hwn heddiw, oherwydd mae pwynt 3, yn fy marn i, wedi ei eirio'n dda mewn gwirionedd. Nid ydym ni eisiau cronfa wedi'i chanoli na'i chyfarwyddo gan y DU; rydym ni eisiau un y mae gennym ni fwy o ddylanwad arni nag a fu gennym pan gafodd ei rhedeg gan yr UE. Nid ydym ni eisiau osgoi'r gweinyddiaethau datganoledig; rydym ni eisiau ceisio cytuno ar rywbeth sy'n gweithio i Gymru ac i'r Deyrnas Unedig. Rwyf i'n edrych ymlaen at gefnogi'r cynnig.
English: In terms of taking this debate forward, I don't actually dismiss the funding the way that the Member for Monmouthshire suggested in an earlier contribution, but what I do find deeply concerning is that we don't have any vision or identifiable ambition for this fund. Years after it's been announced, we don't know what the objectives of the fund are, except for a couple of sentences in the Conservatives' 2017 election. We don't know what's the funding that's going to be available, we don't know how that funding is going to be distributed, we don't know what measures will be used to distribute that funding, and we don't understand how devolution will be recognised and regarded, both in the development of policy and in the delivery of policy. That is an important part of this debate, because this debate tells us more about the United Kingdom than it tells us about past funding from the European Union. I will take an intervention.
Welsh: O ran bwrw ymlaen â'r ddadl hon, nid wyf i mewn gwirionedd yn diystyru'r cyllid fel a awgrymodd yr Aelod dros Sir Fynwy mewn cyfraniad cynharach, ond yr hyn sy'n peri pryder mawr i mi yw nad oes gennym unrhyw weledigaeth nac uchelgais amlwg ar gyfer y gronfa hon. Flynyddoedd ar ôl ei chyhoeddi, nid ydym ni'n gwybod beth yw amcanion y gronfa, heblaw am ambell frawddeg yn etholiad 2017 y Ceidwadwyr. Nid ydym yn gwybod beth yw'r arian fydd ar gael, nid ydym yn gwybod sut y caiff yr arian hwnnw ei ddosbarthu, nid ydym yn gwybod pa fesurau a ddefnyddir i ddosbarthu'r arian hwnnw, ac nid ydym yn deall sut y caiff datganoli ei gydnabod na'i ystyried, wrth ddatblygu polisi a chyflwyno polisi. Mae hynny'n rhan bwysig o'r ddadl hon, gan fod y ddadl hon yn dweud mwy wrthym am y Deyrnas Unedig nag y mae'n ei ddweud am gyllid yn y gorffennol gan yr Undeb Ewropeaidd. Fe gymeraf ymyriad.
English: I think there needs to be a reality check here. We should have had a withdrawal agreement approved by Parliament last autumn. That's obviously what the Government was aiming to do. We should have left in March and should now be in a transition period in which all the current payments would be guaranteed until the end of this cycle, and during this period we would have then constructed the shared prosperity fund, and the consultation would have occurred. It's all the people here who have either directly or through your support of your colleagues in Westminster prevented a withdrawal agreement getting through Parliament that have put us in this position. You can't discuss these really important issues that are a consequence of the withdrawal agreement and leaving before you've done that.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu bod angen ychydig o realiti yn y fan yma. Dylem ni fod wedi bod â chytundeb ymadael wedi'i gymeradwyo gan y Senedd hydref diwethaf. Dyna'n amlwg yr oedd y Llywodraeth yn ceisio'i wneud. Dylem ni fod wedi ymadael ym mis Mawrth ac erbyn hyn dylem ni fod mewn cyfnod pontio lle byddai'r holl daliadau presennol wedi eu gwarantu tan ddiwedd y cylch hwn, ac yn ystod y cyfnod hwn byddem wedyn wedi ffurfio'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin, a byddai'r ymgynghoriad wedi'i gynnal. Yr holl bobl yn y fan yma sydd wedi atal, naill ai'n uniongyrchol neu drwy gefnogi eich cydweithwyr yn San Steffan, gytundeb ymadael rhag mynd drwy'r Senedd, hynny sydd wedi ein rhoi yn y sefyllfa hon. Ni allwch chi drafod y materion gwirioneddol bwysig hyn sy'n deillio o'r penderfyniad i ymadael a gadael cyn i chi wneud hynny.
English: Strangely, I speak today in two capacities, both as Chair of the external affairs committee, which has looked very carefully at this, but also as a constituency Member whose constituency has benefited from the funds from Europe. I'll start by reflecting on that last point, particularly on the contribution by Delyth Jewell, because we often talk about European funding on buildings and roads and structures, but the real benefits of European funding have been the programmes that we've seen operating in our own constituencies, in the disadvantaged communities, helping people gain qualifications, move on with skills, move into employment, full-time or part-time, to be able to build their lives. That's the real benefit we've seen with these funds, and very often those programmes are forgotten when we talk about structural funds. The motion rightly notes that we receive £370 million a year, and can I remind Mark Reckless that the structural funds don't refer to anything on the agricultural side? So, when you quoted your figure, we were actually benefiters not losers on this, as a consequence of funding to European - [ Interruption. ] Of course I will.
Welsh: Yn rhyfedd iawn, rwy'n siarad heddiw mewn dwy swyddogaeth, fel Cadeirydd y pwyllgor materion allanol, sydd wedi edrych yn ofalus iawn ar hyn, ond hefyd fel Aelod etholaeth ar gyfer etholaeth sydd wedi elwa ar yr arian gan Ewrop. Fe wnaf i ddechrau trwy fyfyrio ar y pwynt olaf hwnnw, yn enwedig ar gyfraniad Delyth Jewell, gan ein bod ni'n aml yn sôn am gyllid Ewropeaidd ar adeiladau a ffyrdd a strwythurau, ond gwir fanteision cyllid Ewropeaidd fu'r rhaglenni yr ydym ni wedi'u gweld yn gweithredu yn ein hetholaethau ni ein hunain, yn y cymunedau difreintiedig, yn helpu pobl i ennill cymwysterau, symud ymlaen gyda sgiliau, symud i gyflogaeth, yn llawn amser neu'n rhan amser, i allu datblygu eu bywydau. Dyna'r gwir fudd yr ydym ni wedi'i weld o'r cronfeydd hyn, ac yn aml iawn caiff y rhaglenni hynny eu hanghofio wrth sôn am gronfeydd strwythurol. Mae'r cynnig yn nodi'n gywir ein bod yn derbyn £370 miliwn y flwyddyn, ac a gaf i atgoffa Mark Reckless nad yw'r cronfeydd strwythurol yn cyfeirio at unrhyw beth ar yr ochr amaethyddol? Felly, pan wnaethoch chi ddyfynnu eich ffigur, roeddem yn fuddiolwyr yn hyn, mewn gwirionedd, nid oeddem ni ddim ar ein colled o ganlyniad i gyllid i raglenni Ewropeaidd - [ Torri ar draws. ] Wrth gwrs y gwnaf.
English: What about all the extra money that Welsh residents pay in terms of the higher prices for food he mentioned, but also, indeed, for clothing and footwear?
Welsh: Beth am yr holl arian ychwanegol y mae trigolion Cymru yn ei dalu o ran y prisiau uwch am fwyd y dywedodd amdano, ond hefyd, yn wir, am ddillad ac esgidiau?