techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I have to say that, at the moment, there is no evidence of that. There is evidence of people questioning what's happening: 'Is this going to impact upon us?' We can can say 'No', as Dyfan has said, 'our relationship as a regulator will continue with you.' To be honest, some organisations that won't be captured under standards - some of these new organisations - have expressed concern to me recently that they won't be captured, because that is what they would choose, so that they could be part of this family of organisations in Wales working to standards. And there are organisations that will be asking Government whether they can be included in the standards regime.
Welsh: Mae'n rhaid imi ddweud, ar hyn o bryd, nid oes tystiolaeth o hynny. Mae yna dystiolaeth o bobl yn cwestiynu beth sy'n digwydd: 'A ydy hwn yn mynd i effeithio arnom ni?' Rŷm ni'n gallu dweud, 'Na, mae ein perthynas ni', fel mae Dyfan wedi'i ddweud, 'gyda chi, fel rheoleiddiwr, yn mynd i barhau.' A dweud y gwir, mae ambell i sefydliad na fydd yn dod o dan safonau - rhai o'r cyrff newydd yma - wedi mynegi pryder i fi yn ddiweddar na fyddan nhw ddim o dan y safonau, achos dyna fuasen nhw'n ei ddymuno, er mwyn bod yn rhan o'r teulu yma o sefydliadau yng Nghymru sy'n gweithredu o dan safonau. Ac mae yna sefydliadau, o bosib, yn mynd i fod yn gofyn i'r Llywodraeth a allan nhw gael eu cynnwys o dan y safonau.
English: So, you argue that there is no need for change at present, because, first, the risk of the loss of momentum with what's happened so far if we have the potential three-year delay, and the second reason is that things haven't bedded in, they haven't been able to take root. Is that a fair summary? And so, are you arguing that there is no need for any change in future at any point?
Welsh: Felly, rydych chi'n dadlau nad oes angen newid ar hyn o bryd oherwydd, un, y peryg o golli momentwm efo'r hyn sydd wedi digwydd cyn belled, y tair blynedd posib o oedi a all ddigwydd yn sgil hyn, a'r ail reswm, bod pethau heb wreiddio, bod pethau'n newydd. A ydy hynny'n crynhoi hynny? Felly, a ydych chi'n dadlau nad oes dim angen newid o gwbl ar ryw bwynt i'r dyfodol?
English: No. May I say, first of all, that your analysis is correct? We are concerned about that loss of momentum. We are concerned about the possible opportunities missed. I don't think, at times, the Welsh Government realises how much benefit has been brought about by this legislation, and that they would gain from building on those successes. Does that mean that there will never be change? Well, no, I think we need to keep any legislation under the microscope in terms of where amendments are required, but I do think that we need reform within what we have rather than throwing one system out and introducing a new system. I would anticipate, with the standards already in existence, that at some point we would need to review those as the working habits of those organisations change, as digital working develops. I'll just use the English word - I think we'll need to 'tweak' them.
Welsh: Na. A gaf i ddweud yn gyntaf fod eich dadansoddiad chi yn gywir? Rŷm ni'n poeni am y colli momentwm. Rŷm ni'n poeni am y colli cyfle sy'n mynd i fod. Wir, nid wyf yn credu, ar adegau, fod Llywodraeth Cymru yn sylweddoli faint o fudd sydd wedi bod i'r ddeddfwriaeth yn barod, a buasen nhw ar eu hennill o fod yn adeiladu ar hynny. A ydy hynny yn golygu na fydd byth newid? Rydw i'n credu bod angen cadw unrhyw ddeddfwriaeth o dan ficrosgop o ran beth sydd angen ei newid, ond diwygio o fewn beth sydd gyda ni yn hytrach na thaflu un gyfundrefn allan a dod â chyfundrefn arall i mewn, buaswn i'n dweud. Rydw i'n rhagweld, gyda'r safonau sy'n bodoli yn barod ar sefydliadau, ar ryw adeg fe fydd angen adolygu'r rheini wrth i batrymau gwaith sefydliadau newid, wrth i batrymau gwaith digidol gryfhau. Bydd angen jest - i ddefnyddio'r gair Saesneg - tweak.
English: What do you think the changes of greatest concern would be following the implementation of the proposals in the White Paper? Assuming that it's post the Assembly elections and there's the intention of carrying on with establishing a new commission, and removing the commissioner's role, and moving on with the proposals in the White Paper. What would be the impact of that in reality?
Welsh: Beth ydych chi'n meddwl ydy'r newidiadau mwyaf o gonsýrn a fyddai'n deillio o weithredu cynigion y Papur Gwyn? Gan gymryd rŵan fod y cyfnod yma - rydym ni wedi cyrraedd ar ôl etholiadau'r Cynulliad ac mae yna fwriad i symud ymlaen efo comisiwn, ac i ddileu rôl y comisiynydd, a symud ymlaen efo cynigion y Papur Gwyn fel y maen nhw ar hyn o bryd. Beth fyddai effaith hynny mewn gwirionedd?
English: There are a number of questions arising. First of all, with the evidence base for a need for change, we'll accept that. I do think, in considering those organisations that have already invested, and the sectors that have already invested in standards, is it fair, and is it the best use of public funds, to be telling them, 'Well, you will be changing to a slightly different structure once again'? I'm not convinced that - it is a little ambiguous as to what the new regime would be, but I don't think that that is where we should be using public resources at the moment, in discussing the creation of new, different structures. I think we need to identify where there is room to build on what we have in place already; that would be the challenge. We've heard Members mentioning a period of financial austerity. I don't know that creating new systems is going to be the best use of funds at this point. Also, is that going to strengthen the position of the Welsh language? There is also a risk in structure change that you lose sight of your actual ambition, namely, creating confident bilingual speakers and users.
Welsh: Mae sawl cwestiwn yn codi. I ddechrau, gyda'r sail tystiolaeth mae'r angen i newid, so gwnawn ni dderbyn hynny. Rydw i yn credu, o feddwl am y sefydliadau hynny sydd wedi buddsoddi yn barod, a'r sectorau sydd wedi buddsoddi yn barod mewn safonau, a ydy e'n deg a'r defnydd gorau o arian cyhoeddus i fod yn dweud wrthyn nhw, 'Rŷch chi'n mynd i fod yn newid i strwythur ychydig yn wahanol eto'? Nid ydw i'n sicr bod y drafodaeth - mae braidd yn annelwig beth fuasai'r gyfundrefn newydd, ond nid ydw i'n credu mai dyna le dylem ni fod yn defnyddio adnoddau cyhoeddus ar hyn o bryd, yn sôn am greu strwythurau gwahanol, ac yn y blaen. Adnabod lle mae yna le i adeiladu ar beth sydd gyda ni yn barod fuasai'r her, rydw i'n credu. Rŷm ni wedi clywed Aelodau'n sôn am gyfnod o dyndra cyllidol. Nid ydw i'n siŵr bod creu systemau o'r newydd eto yn mynd i fod yn ddefnydd da o arian. A hefyd, a ydy hynny yn mynd i gryfhau'r sefyllfa'r Gymraeg? Mae yna wastad peryg o fod yn newid strwythurau eich bod chi'n colli'r nod o beth rŷm ni'n ceisio'i gyflawni, sef creu siaradwyr a chreu defnyddwyr hyderus dwyieithog.
English: The Government's argument would be that a commission, rather than the status quo, would enable greater movement towards the promotion and facilitation aspect and towards more strategic planning. That is, it's obvious that there would be a shift of emphasis.
Welsh: Dadl y Llywodraeth fyddai y byddai comisiwn, yn hytrach na'r sefyllfa sydd gennym ni ar hyn o bryd, byddai comisiwn yn galluogi symud mwy tuag at yr agwedd hybu a hwyluso a thuag at fwy o gynllunio strategol. Hynny yw, mae'n amlwg bod yna newid pwyslais.
English: I still don't think we've taken full advantage of the powers that exist within the current legislation in terms of promotion and facilitation, and the opportunities that exist within the commissioner's office to do some of that work. There will be a need for the Welsh Government to have its own Welsh language strategy in place, but I do think that there is scope within the current legislation, and I don't see any tension in that regard, in strengthening that promotion and facilitation area. It's a problem of resources that makes that difficult at the moment.
Welsh: Rydw i'n dal i feddwl nad ydym wedi manteisio yn llwyr ar y pwerau sy'n bodoli o fewn y ddeddfwriaeth bresennol o ran hybu a hwyluso, a'r cyfleoedd sy'n eistedd o fewn swyddfa'r comisiynydd i wneud peth o'r gwaith yna. Fe fydd angen i Lywodraeth Cymru gael strategaeth o ran y Gymraeg ei hunan, ond rydw i yn credu bod yna le o fewn y ddeddfwriaeth bresennol, ac nid ydw i'n gweld tensiwn o ran hynny o fanteisio a chryfhau'r elfen hybu a hwyluso. Yn y bôn, prinder adnoddau ar hyn o bryd sy'n gwneud hynny'n anodd.
English: If there is a significant period, a three-year delay, and there's no work done on the new standards, does that give you an opportunity to move strategically within the commissioner's office towards doing more promotion and facilitation work?
Welsh: Os mae yna dair blynedd o oedi sylweddol, a dim llawer o waith o safbwynt safonau newydd yn digwydd, a ydy hynny'n rhoi cyfle i chi symud yn strategol o fewn swyddfa'r comisiynydd tuag at wneud mwy o waith hybu a hwyluso?
English: I won't be there.
Welsh: Ni fyddaf i yna.
English: Well, it's true to say that we are reviewing our work on an ongoing basis, and identifying where there are opportunities for us to do more in other areas. One thing about this argument is that promotion and facilitation are not independent of each other, and it's important to remember that. There is promotional work taking place under the regulatory system. We were discussing promotional standards earlier, which enable local authorities, for example, to have promotional schemes and plans, and there is constructive work taking place on the regulatory side as well, where there are promotion guidelines given there. But certainly, if it were possible for us to do more of the promotional work that we're doing with the companies and the charities, then we'd be very eager to do that. But our general budget remains the same, having said that.
Welsh: Wel, mae'n gywir i ddweud ein bod ni'n adolygu ein gwaith yn gyson, a gweld lle mae yna gyfleoedd i ni wneud mwy mewn meysydd eraill. Un o'r pethau efo'r ddadl yma yw nad yw hybu a rheoleiddio yn annibynnol ar ei gilydd, ac mae'n bwysig cofio hynny. Mae yna waith hybu yn digwydd o dan y gyfundrefn reoleiddio. Roeddem ni'n trafod safonau hybu yn gynharach, sy'n galluogi awdurdodau lleol, er enghraifft, i gael cynlluniau hybu, ac mae yna waith adeiladol yn digwydd o ran yr ochr reoleiddio hefyd, lle mae yna ganllawiau gwaith hybu yn digwydd ar yr ochr yna. Ond yn sicr, rydw i'n meddwl, os oes yna gyfleoedd inni wneud mwy o'r gwaith hybu yr ydym ni'n ei wneud efo busnesau ac elusennau hefyd, mi fuasem ni'n awyddus iawn i wneud hynny. Ond mae ein cyllideb gyffredinol ni'n parhau fel ag y mae o hefyd, wedi dweud hynny.
English: Just one final question from me, on the private sector. Of course, most of the private sector is beyond the scope of the current legislation. How could that be changed, and does it need to be changed?
Welsh: Jyst un cwestiwn terfynol gennyf i, felly, ynglŷn â'r sector preifat. Wrth gwrs, mae rhan fwyaf y sector preifat y tu hwn i sgôp y ddeddfwriaeth bresennol. Sut byddai newid hynny? A oes angen newid hynny?
English: We've already discussed the fact that the utilities - the water companies - are there already. Transport companies are also included within the Measure, and telecommunications companies are in, as are electricity and gas. So, there are parts of the private sector that we could - and we have prepared to do that, through our standards investigations - actually pursue, if the Government passed the standards regulations.
Welsh: Rŷm ni wedi trafod yn barod y ffaith bod cyfleustodau - y cwmnïau dŵr - yno yn barod. Mae cwmnïau trafnidiaeth i mewn yn y Mesur yn barod, mae cwmnïau telegyfathrebu i mewn, mae ynni a nwy i mewn. So, mae yna ddarnau o'r sector preifat - ac rŷm ni wedi paratoi i wneud hynny, drwy ein hymchwiliadau safonau - a gallem ni fynd ar ôl y sectorau hynny pe bai'r Llywodraeth yn pasio'r rheoliadau safonau.
English: But as regards the retail sector - these major companies - we've seen examples time after time of the lack of goodwill towards the Welsh language.
Welsh: Ond o ran y sector manwerthu - y cwmnïau mawr yma - rydym yn clywed enghreifftiau dro ar ôl tro, onid ydym, am ddiffyg ewyllys da tuag at y Gymraeg.
English: As Dyfan has explained, we work closely with them. Questions do arise, certainly, with the financial sector - the banking sector. They have become used to regulation now. They, I think, perhaps wouldn't welcome but would certainly understand the rationale of standards. We work closely with them and, very often - . I don't think that they would oppose that concept, and certainly I wouldn't oppose seeing the banks included under standards. That could be done through extending the current Measure at some point.
Welsh: Fel y mae Dyfan wedi ei egluro, rŷm ni'n gweithio'n agos gyda nhw. Mae yna gwestiynau, yn sicr, yn codi gyda'r sector, fel y sector cyllid - y sector banciau. Maen nhw wedi arfer cael eu rheoleiddio erbyn hyn. Fydden nhw, rydw i'n credu, efallai ddim cweit yn croesawu ond yn sicr yn gweld rhesymeg y safonau. Rŷm ni'n gweithio'n agos gyda nhw ac, yn aml, maen nhw - . Nid wyf i'n credu y bydden nhw'n wrthwynebus i'r cysyniad hwnnw ac, yn sicr, ni fyddwn i'n wrthwynebus i'r cysyniad o fanciau yn dod o dan safonau. Byddai modd gwneud hynny drwy ymestyn y Mesur presennol ar ryw adeg.
English: So, there's no need for new legislation in order to bring standards into the private sector.
Welsh: Nid oes angen deddfwriaeth newydd er mwyn dod â'r safonau i fewn i'r sector breifat.
English: I think that it is constitutional experts here who could perhaps deal with that question.
Welsh: Rydw i'n credu mai arbenigwyr cyfansoddiadol yn fan hyn fyddai'n gallu delio â hynny.
English: I would argue that legislation is exceptionally important, but we have legislation currently. We have the Welsh Language (Wales) Measure 2011, and I do think that there is an opportunity now to look at those crucial areas, namely education - I would argue that pre-16 and post-16 education are crucially important in creating a bilingual workforce in Wales. Language use is a challenge where you can't legislate. You can't force anyone to use the Welsh language through legislation. I can't see us getting to that kind of situation, but there are other ways of encouraging language use, and that's where the emphasis needs to be.
Welsh: Buaswn i'n dadlau bod deddfwriaeth yn eithriadol o bwysig, ond mae deddfwriaeth gennym ni ar hyn o bryd. Mae Mesur y Gymraeg (Cymru) 2011 yn bodoli, ac rydw i'n credu bod yna gyfle nawr i edrych ar y meysydd hanfodol bwysig hynny, sef addysg - byddwn i'n dadlau bod yr addysg cyn-16 ac addysg ôl-16 yn hollbwysig o ran creu gweithlu dwyieithog yng Nghymru. Mae defnydd yn sialens lle allwch chi ddim deddfu i orfodi rhywun i ddefnyddio'r Gymraeg. Nid wyf i'n credu ein bod ni'n dod i'r math yna o sefyllfa, ond mae yna ffyrdd eraill o annog defnydd, a dyna lle mae angen y pwyslais.
English: We have a Welsh language tribunal, of course, currently in existence. The regulatory powers that are held by us are substantial. It's early days in terms of us using those powers. As you will be aware, in the legislation there is a range of things that we can do in terms of enforcement. There is a scale of enforcements, so our work on enforcement is only just starting. So, I would argue that there is scope within the current legislation and, with time, we will see how successful that is. But we are only now starting to use the current legislation.
Welsh: Mae gyda ni dribiwnlys y Gymraeg, wrth gwrs, yn bodoli ar hyn o bryd. Mae'r pwerau rheoleiddio sy'n eistedd gyda ni yn rhai sylweddol. Mae'n ddyddiau cynnar o ran ni'n defnyddio'r pwerau hynny. Fel rŷch chi'n ymwybodol, yn y ddeddfwriaeth mae yna ystod o bethau y gallem ni eu gwneud o ran gorfodi. Mae yna ysgol o ymyriadau prin wedi dechrau o ran y gorfodi yr ydym ni wedi ei wneud. So, eto, buaswn i'n dadlau bod sgôp o fewn y ddeddfwriaeth bresennol a, gydag amser, mi welwn ni pa mor llwyddiannus yw hynny. Ond megis dechrau yr ydym ni o ran defnyddio'r ddeddfwriaeth bresennol.
English: Can I just ask a quick question, because I want to get it on the record? Perhaps the Welsh Government would come back on the issue of the creation of a commission and say that there are international examples where they do more than simply deal with the language. I think that in Kosovo, within the scope of the commissioner's activity, it is broader than simply just the language; it's about human rights too. So, turning it into a commission would bring in different expertise around the table rather than having a single commissioner in place. That is perhaps what I'm starting to hear from the Welsh Government. How would you respond to that?
Welsh: A allaf i jest ofyn cwestiwn clou, achos rŷm ni eisiau ei gael e ar y record? Efallai y byddai Llywodraeth Cymru yn dod yn ôl, o ran creu comisiwn, a dweud bod yna esiamplau rhyngwladol lle maen nhw'n gwneud mwy na dim ond yr iaith. Rwy'n credu bod Kosovo, o fewn cwmpawd gwaith y comisiynydd, yn gwneud pethau mwy eang nag iaith; maen nhw'n gwneud pethau ynglŷn â hawliau dynol hefyd. Felly, byddai ei droi e'n gomisiwn yn caniatáu arbenigedd gwahanol o gwmpas y bwrdd yn hytrach na bod yna un comisiynydd. Dyna, efallai, yr hyn rwy'n dechrau ei glywed gan Lywodraeth Cymru. Beth fyddech chi'n dweud am hynny?
English: In Kosovo, there is an independent language commissioner with a very similar model to the one we have here in Wales. It has been established under very different conditions, of course, following the fighting that took place in Kosovo, so, naturally, there is an element of human rights there, but the remit is almost exactly the same as the remit that I have as a language commissioner.
Welsh: Yn Kosovo, comisiynydd iaith annibynnol ar fodel tebyg iawn i beth sydd gyda ni yng Nghymru sy'n bodoli. Mae e wedi cael ei sefydlu o dan amodau gwahanol iawn yn dilyn, wrth gwrs, yr ymladd fuodd yn Kosovo, felly mae yna, yn naturiol, elfen o hawliau dynol, ond mae'r remit fwy neu lai'n gywir yr un fath â'r remit sydd gen i fel comisiynydd iaith.
English: Thank you very much for that. If there are further questions - and I do understand that you have provided us with some timelines in terms of legislation in the past - or if there is anything that you would like to add, then we would welcome that of course. If we do have further questions, we will write to you with those. But thank you very much.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn am hynny. Os oes mwy o gwestiynau - rwyf ar ddeall eich bod wedi rhoi amserlenni gwaith i ni o ran deddfwriaeth o'r blaen - ac os oes unrhyw beth ychwanegol yr hoffech chi ei roi inni, byddai hynny'n grêt hefyd. Os oes mwy o gwestiynau, byddwn ni'n ysgrifennu atoch chi. Ond diolch yn fawr iawn.
English: Thank you very much, and we will be here again in a fortnight, looking at the assurance report and the annual report, and if there are any additional questions or any further evidence, then I'm sure that we can use those sessions in order to deal with that.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, ac mi fyddwn ni yma eto ymhen pythefnos yn edrych ar yr adroddiad sicrwydd a'r adroddiad blynyddol, ac os oes yna unrhyw gwestiynau ychwanegol neu unrhyw dystiolaeth ychwanegol, rydw i'n sicr y gallwn ni ddefnyddio'r sesiynau yna i rannu hynny.
English: Thanks very much to you.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn i chi.
English: We will move on to item 4 - papers to note. We have paper 4.1 on funding for and access to music education, and that's a letter from Making Music. There's a letter from the BBC National Orchestra and Chorus of Wales - just to put on record that we'll be discussing that work in our private session. And then there's another letter from Ffilm Cymru Wales on film and major television production in Wales, and, again, we will discuss that in our private session. And then, there's a letter from the Llywydd to me on the Senedd@ programme. I will just remind Members that we have agreed that the committee will meet on 6 December in Aberystwyth as part of the Senedd@ programme. So, please keep that free in your diaries. Are there any comments from Members? No.
Welsh: Symudwn ymlaen at eitem 4 - papurau i'w nodi. Mae 4.1 ar gyllid ar gyfer addysg gerddoriaeth gan Making Music. Mae yna lythyr gan Gerddorfa Genedlaethol Cymru a Chorws Cenedlaethol Cymru y BBC - jest i roi ar y record ein bod ni'n mynd i fod yn trafod y gwaith hwnnw yn y sesiwn preifat. Ac wedyn, mae yna lythyr arall gan Ffilm Cymru Wales ynglŷn â chynyrchiadau ffilm a theledu mawr yng Nghymru, ac, eto, byddwn ni'n trafod hynny yn y sesiwn preifat. Wedyn, mae yna lythyr gan y Llywydd ataf i ar raglen Senedd@. Rwy jest eisiau atgoffa Aelodau yma heddiw ein bod ni wedi cytuno y bydd y pwyllgor yn cynnal ein cyfarfod ar 6 Rhagfyr yn Aberystwyth fel rhan o fenter Senedd@. Felly, cadwch hynny'n rhydd yn eich dyddiaduron. A oes unrhyw sylwadau gan Aelodau yn hynny o beth? Na.
English: Item 5 is a motion under Standing Order 17.42 to resolve to exclude the public from the remainder of the meeting. Is everyone content? Everyone is content. Thank you.
Welsh: Eitem 5 yw cynnig o dan Reol Sefydlog 17.42 i wahardd y cyhoedd o weddill y sesiwn. A yw pawb yn hapus gyda hynny? Hapus ac yn llawen. Diolch.
English: Just on that point, because the point that the Chair raised about the 2017 Wales Act is relevant here because we're changing the model now to be a reserved-powers model, but, more than that, anything that's relevant to something that is reserved also becomes reserved. So, yes, it used to be the case that, if the subject under consideration was in a devolved area mainly, as you've just argued, such as housing here - but, of course, there is an overlap with consumer protection, which is a reserved power. So, are you using the same argument that we had with the last model of devolution rather than the one that we have now, which is reservation?
Welsh: Ar y pwynt yna, achos bod y pwynt a wnaeth y Cadeirydd ei godi ynglŷn â Deddf Cymru 2017 yn berthnasol achos rydym ni'n newid y model rŵan i fod yn fodel cadwedig, ond, yn fwy na hynny, mae unrhyw beth sy'n berthnasol i rywbeth sy'n gadwedig hefyd yn dod yn gadwedig. Felly, roedd hi'n arfer bod, os oedd y pwnc o dan sylw mewn maes a oedd wedi'i ddatganoli yn bennaf, fel rŷch chi newydd ddadlau rŵan, megis tai yn y lle hyn - ond, wrth gwrs, mae yna orgyffwrdd efo materion fel consumer protection, sydd yn gadwedig. Felly, a ydych chi'n dal i ddefnyddio'r un ddadl ag yr oeddem ni'n arfer ei dadlau pan oedd y model diwethaf gyda ni yn lle'r model sydd gyda ni rŵan, o reolau cadwedig?
English: Thank you, Chair. Of course, the Bill that we're considering this afternoon follows and interacts with the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 that's already been introduced by the Welsh Government, but, essentially, this has not come into force yet. So, the first question is: when do you envisage that this Act will commence, and why has it taken so long?
Welsh: Diolch, Gadeirydd. Wrth gwrs, mae'r Bil yma rydym ni'n ei gysidro brynhawn yma yn dilyn ac yn rhyngweithio efo Deddf Rhentu Cartrefi (Cymru) 2016 sydd eisoes wedi cael ei chyflwyno gan Lywodraeth Cymru, ond, yn y bôn, nid yw hyn wedi dod i rym eto. Felly, y cwestiwn cyntaf ydy: pryd ydych chi'n rhagweld y bydd Deddf Rhentu Cartrefi (Cymru) 2016 yn cychwyn, a pham y mae wedi cymryd cyhyd?
English: Right, okay. Moving on to the Bill itself, can I ask: as section 19 of the Bill allows Welsh Ministers to make regulations for the Bill to apply to assured tenancies, is there a likelihood that there will be a delay before commencing this Act as well?
Welsh: Iawn, ocê. I symud yn benodol at y Bil ei hunan, a allaf ofyn: gan fod adran 19 o'r Bil yn caniatáu i Weinidogion Cymru wneud rheoliadau i'r Bil fod yn gymwys i denantiaethau diogel, a ydy hi'n debygol y bydd oedi cyn cychwyn y Ddeddf yma hefyd?