English: I'd be grateful if the Trefnydd could please confirm the media reports that an urgent debate will soon be held about the change to cervical cancer screenings, after we've already heard this afternoon that over 1 million people signed petitions on this issue. I do think it's fundamentally important, because again, as we've heard, over the past week people in Wales, women in Wales, have been deeply confused and concerned because these routine cervical smear tests will now be offered every five years instead of every three years. The fact that the announcement was made on social media with a graphic that didn't explain the context or the reason for this change caused some panic. Members have been contacted now by Public Health Wales, and the First Minister has set this out this afternoon as well, to explain that the test has changed, the cells will in future be tested for HPV infection first, and we've been assured that that is a more accurate way of screening. That is reassuring to hear, though I have been contacted by constituents who are still concerned. There are some further queries that I will be raising in any debate, but overwhelmingly, an urgent debate must surely be necessary to help quell the concerns of those women who saw that graphic online. They didn't have the contextual information. It's unlikely that the thousands upon thousands of people who've signed those petitions now know about the reason that's been given. I know our health spokesman has written to the health Minister asking her to arrange direct communication with all of those affected to explain the change, and I really think that an urgent debate on top of this would be welcome. So, could you please confirm, Trefnydd, that those reports are accurate, and could you also tell us please whether the debate will be amendable by Members?
Welsh: Byddwn i'n ddiolchgar pe bai'r Trefnydd yn cadarnhau adroddiadau'r cyfryngau y bydd dadl frys yn cael ei chynnal yn fuan ynghylch y newid i sgriniau canser ceg y groth, ar ôl i ni glywed eisoes y prynhawn yma fod dros 1 miliwn o bobl wedi llofnodi deisebau ar y mater hwn. Rwy'n credu ei bod yn hanfodol bwysig, oherwydd unwaith eto, fel yr ydym ni wedi'i glywed, yn ystod yr wythnos diwethaf, mae pobl yng Nghymru, menywod yng Nghymru, wedi drysu ac yn bryderus iawn oherwydd bydd y profion ceg y groth arferol hyn yn cael eu cynnig bob pum mlynedd yn hytrach na phob tair blynedd. Roedd y ffaith bod y cyhoeddiad wedi'i wneud ar y cyfryngau cymdeithasol gyda graffigyn nad oedd yn esbonio'r cyd-destun na'r rheswm dros y newid hwn yn achosi rhywfaint o banig. Mae Iechyd Cyhoeddus Cymru wedi cysylltu â'r Aelodau nawr, ac mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi nodi hyn y prynhawn yma hefyd, i egluro bod y prawf wedi newid, yn y dyfodol bydd y celloedd yn cael eu profi ar gyfer haint HPV yn gyntaf, ac rydym ni wedi cael sicrwydd bod hynny'n ffordd fwy cywir o sgrinio. Mae clywed hynny'n galonogol, er bod etholwyr yn dal i bryderu ac wedi cysylltu â mi. Mae rhai cwestiynau eraill y byddaf i'n eu codi mewn unrhyw ddadl, ond yn bennaf, mae'n sicr y bydd angen dadl frys i helpu i leddfu pryderon y menywod hynny a welodd y graffigyn hwnnw ar-lein. Nid oedd ganddyn nhw'r wybodaeth gyd-destunol. Mae'n annhebygol bod y miloedd ar filoedd o bobl sydd wedi llofnodi'r deisebau hynny nawr yn ymwybodol o'r rheswm sydd wedi'i roi. Rwy'n gwybod bod ein llefarydd iechyd wedi ysgrifennu at y Gweinidog iechyd yn gofyn iddi hi drefnu bod neges uniongyrchol yn mynd at bawb yr effeithiwyd arnyn nhw i esbonio'r newid, ac rwy'n credu mewn gwirionedd y byddai dadl frys ar ben hyn i'w chroesawu. Felly, a wnewch chi gadarnhau, Trefnydd, fod yr adroddiadau hynny'n gywir, ac a wnewch chi ddweud wrthym ni hefyd a fydd yr Aelodau'n gallu diwygio'r ddadl?