English: It is a fact that the blue route goes past many, many homes and would affect, we think, up to 4,000 people. That's the reality of it. It would pass very, very close to their houses and, in fact, some buildings will have to be demolished, both commercial and residential. There's no avoiding that, and I doubt very much whether any Government would be looked upon favourably if it were to move ahead with the blue route without proper consultation. We've said in the public inquiry that the public inquiry will look at both the black and blue routes. We want the inquiry to be as wide-ranging as possible and to be as open as possible so that people can see that the process is one that they can have faith in. But I have to say once again: any suggestion that the Welsh Government was involved or knew of the data that was provided on 25 July is wrong - wholly wrong and wholly untrue. I don't accuse him of saying that, but I'm saying that the information he has received is simply wrong. What happens is that they work on this and they inform people of what they're doing. On this occasion they did not even tell us when the figures were going to be published. They shared them with Highways England first. They didn't even tell us they'd done that. We had to ask for them and, when they were shared with us, they were shared with us on the basis that is abnormal. Normally, the data is shared and nine to 12 months is available for the data to be examined carefully. That was not done at this time, and here we have a set of data that at the moment would benefit London and the south-east of England at everyone's expense, and that we cannot accept.
Welsh: Mae'n ffaith fod y llwybr glas yn mynd heibio llawer iawn o gartrefi a fyddai'n effeithio, rydym ni'n meddwl, ar hyd at 4,000 o bobl. Dyna'r gwirionedd. Byddai'n mynd heibio yn agos iawn, iawn at eu tai ac, a dweud y gwir, byddai'n rhaid dymchwel rhai adeiladau, masnachol a phreswyl. Ni ellir osgoi hynny, ac rwy'n amau'n fawr iawn a fyddai unrhyw Lywodraeth yn cael ei hystyried yn ffafriol pe byddai'n bwrw ymlaen â'r llwybr glas heb ymgynghoriad priodol. Rydym ni wedi dweud yn yr ymchwiliad cyhoeddus y bydd yr ymchwiliad cyhoeddus yn ystyried y llwybrau du a glas. Rydym ni eisiau i'r ymchwiliad fod mor eang â phosibl ac i fod mor agored â phosibl, fel y gall pobl weld bod y broses yn un y gallant fod â ffydd ynddi. Ond mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud unwaith eto: mae unrhyw awgrym bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ei chynnwys neu'n gwybod am y data a ddarparwyd ar 25 Gorffennaf yn anghywir - yn gwbl anghywir ac yn gwbl anwir. Nid wyf yn ei gyhuddo ef o ddweud hynny, ond rwy'n dweud bod y wybodaeth y mae wedi ei derbyn, yn syml, yn anghywir. Yr hyn sy'n digwydd yw eu bod yn gweithio ar hyn, ac yna'n hysbysu pobl am yr hyn y maen nhw'n ei wneud. Y tro hwn, ni wnaethant hyd yn oed dweud wrthym pryd yr oedd y ffigurau'n mynd i gael eu cyhoeddi. Fe wnaethant eu rhannu gyda Highways England yn gyntaf. Ni ddywedasant wrthym eu bod wedi gwneud hynny hyd yn oed. Bu'n rhaid i ni ofyn amdanynt a, phan gawsant eu rhannu gyda ni, fe'u rhannwyd gyda ni ar y sail fod hynny'n anarferol. Fel rheol, caiff y data eu rhannu ac mae naw i 12 mis ar gael i archwilio'r data'n ofalus. Ni wnaethpwyd hyn y tro hwn, ac mae gennym ni yn y fan yma gyfres o ddata ar hyn o bryd a fyddai o fudd i Lundain a de-ddwyrain Lloegr ar draul pawb, ac ni allwn dderbyn hynny.