English: I thank the Member for those questions. In relation to the shared prosperity fund, as he will know, the Welsh Government has been clear that Wales should not receive a penny less as a consequence of Brexit and that all decisions currently taken by the Welsh Government in relation to regional funding, as it is, should remain with the Welsh Government. I most recently made those points to the Secretary of State at the beginning of last week. I did not get a commitment in relation to either of those, and I sought a meaningful involvement in the consultation in relation to that in order for us to be able to make those points again, as he will know. There is a clear consensus in Wales that those principles are fundamental and that they are the best way for ensuring post-Brexit regional investment policy here in Wales. He makes a series of points in relation to the process of correcting the statute book in order to ensure an orderly Brexit insofar as statute and our law books are concerned. He makes the legitimate point that the risk and the complexity in the process of doing that requires a high degree of vigilance to ensure that powers are not lost. I will say to him: he mentioned the continuity Bill - he will know very well that the continuity Bill was not an example of us giving up powers. The continuity Bill was a means by which we achieved an inter-governmental agreement, which indeed protected the powers that we have here in Wales and, indeed, gave us extra powers as a consequence of the amendment to the EU withdrawal Act, which would not otherwise have been possible. That gives him an example of the ways in which the Welsh Government has stood up for the devolution settlement in the context of Brexit. On the point of legislation more broadly, he will know that what we have adopted as a position as a Government is that, because of resource issues generally - and I think we should not make light of those - the volume of legislation and secondary legislation that would be required to go through this Chamber would be about the equivalent of 12 months' worth, which would have to come through in about a six-month period, which would be unprecedented in terms of the scale of legislative activity. But we have said that where there are no policy differences and where there are no political sensitivities, we have asked for those corrections to be done at a UK level with our consent. He does identify correctly a number of examples where there have been issues - the reciprocal health arrangement is one of those - and that brings to bear a number of complex issues about the boundary between reserved matters and devolved matters and how, as he mentions the Wales Act 2017, that boundary, sometimes, whilst clear, often intermingles, so issues that are reserved and devolved are mixed in together. Those are difficult judgments for us to reach. And that, then, is an example, in fact, of where we have been pushing back in order to ensure that those powers remain with us here in Wales. May I close by thanking him for his diagnosis of my hoarseness? [ Laughter. ]
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiynau hynny. O ran y gronfa rhannu ffyniant, fel y bydd yn gwybod, mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi bod yn glir na ddylai Cymru dderbyn ceiniog yn llai o ganlyniad i Brexit ac y dylai'r holl benderfyniadau a wneir ar hyn o bryd gan Lywodraeth Cymru ynghylch cyllid rhanbarthol, fel y mae, aros yn nwylo Llywodraeth Cymru. Y tro diweddaraf i mi wneud y pwyntiau hynny wrth yr Ysgrifennydd Gwladol oedd ar ddechrau'r wythnos ddiwethaf. Ni chefais ymrwymiad ynghylch y naill na'r llall o'r rheini, a cheisiais gyfranogiad ystyrlon yn yr ymgynghoriad ynglŷn â hynny er mwyn i ni allu gwneud y pwyntiau hynny unwaith eto, fel y gŵyr ef. Mae consensws clir yng Nghymru bod yr egwyddorion hynny yn sylfaenol ac mai dyna'r ffordd orau o sicrhau polisi buddsoddi rhanbarthol ar ôl Brexit yma yng Nghymru. Mae'n gwneud cyfres o bwyntiau am y broses o gywiro'r llyfr statud er mwyn sicrhau Brexit trefnus o ran statud a'n llyfrau cyfreithiau ni. Mae'n gwneud y pwynt dilys bod y risg a chymhlethdod y broses o wneud hynny yn gofyn am lefel uchel o wyliadwriaeth er mwyn sicrhau nad yw'r pwerau yn cael eu colli. Fe ddywedaf wrtho: soniodd am y Bil parhad - bydd yn gwybod yn iawn nad oedd y Bil parhad yn enghraifft o ildio pwerau. Roedd y Bil parhad yn ffordd a ddefnyddiwyd gennym ni i gyflawni cytundeb rhynglywodraethol, a oedd, yn wir, yn gwarchod y pwerau sydd gennym yma yng Nghymru ac, yn wir, rhoddodd bwerau ychwanegol inni o ganlyniad i'r gwelliant i Ddeddf ymadael â'r UE, na fyddai wedi bod yn bosibl fel arall. Mae hynny'n rhoi enghraifft iddo o'r ffyrdd y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi amddiffyn y setliad datganoli yng nghyd-destun Brexit. Ar y pwynt am ddeddfwriaeth yn fwy cyffredinol, bydd yn gwybod mai'r hyn yr ydym ni wedi'i fabwysiadu fel safbwynt, fel Llywodraeth, yw, oherwydd problemau adnoddau yn gyffredinol - ac rwy'n credu na ddylem ni ddiystyru'r rheini - byddai maint y ddeddfwriaeth a'r is-ddeddfwriaeth y byddai'n ofynnol iddyn nhw fynd drwy'r Siambr hon yn cyfateb i werth 12 mis, a byddai'n gorfod dod trwy'r Siambr mewn cyfnod o chwe mis, a byddai hynny'n ddigyffelyb o ran graddfa'r gweithgarwch deddfwriaethol. Ond rydym wedi dweud, pan nad oes gwahaniaethau polisi a phan nad oes unrhyw sensitifrwydd gwleidyddol, rydym wedi gofyn i'r cywiriadau hynny gael eu gwneud ar lefel y DU gyda'n caniatâd ni. Mae'n nodi yn gywir nifer o enghreifftiau lle cafwyd problemau - mae'r cyd-drefniadau iechyd yn un o'r rheini - ac mae hynny'n codi nifer o faterion cymhleth am y ffin rhwng materion a gedwir yn ôl a materion datganoledig a sut, fel y mae'n sôn am Ddeddf Cymru 2017, mae'r ffin honno, weithiau, er ei bod yn glir, yn aml yn cydgymysgu, felly mae materion a gedwir yn ôl a materion datganoledig yn gymysg â'i gilydd. Mae'r rheini yn ddyfarniadau anodd inni eu pennu. Ac mae hynny, wedyn, yn enghraifft, mewn gwirionedd, o achos lle'r ydym wedi bod yn gwthio yn ôl er mwyn sicrhau bod y pwerau hynny yn aros gyda ni yma yng Nghymru. A gaf i gloi trwy ddiolch iddo am ei ddiagnosis o'm llais cryg? [Chwerthin.]