English: The Member makes a number of points, which these pilots aim to look at. And I do emphasise the 'pilot' point here. I don't want to overemphasise the barriers that we faced in getting to this point, but it has not been simple to construct four separate pilots using different procurement and Government spend leverages in order to do this. I do pay tribute to the team that's managed to do it. But I absolutely emphasise that what we're looking at here are genuine pilots, because I completely take the point that the Member makes: absolutely this is about better jobs closer - the 'closer' word is just as important - to home, for exactly that reason. We do not want people to have long commutes. Even where we're facilitating that, we still don't want that. And actually, what most of the communities in the more rural parts of Wales, and sometimes the inner cities - I also represent an inner city area that has similar problems - what people want is the ability to have a good job around the corner from their house so that they can have a work-life balance and they can have their caring responsibilities taken into account and their children can attend local schools and so on. So, these pilots are very much designed to see whether they work and whether, as I said, we can then pick them up and put them down in other communities, perhaps as linked hubs, perhaps as a single business with multiple outlets - a number of possibilities. And we've worked closely with a whole range of stakeholders across the Government to get to where we are, and I'll certainly be looking forward to reporting back on the pilots and this whole issue of scalability and whether they're placeable and all the rest of it in about a year's time, when we've got some data from them.
Welsh: Mae'r Aelod yn gwneud nifer o bwyntiau, ac mae'n nod gan y cynlluniau peilot hyn i geisio edrych ar y pethau hyn. Ac rwy'n pwysleisio'r pwynt 'peilot' yma. Dydw i ddim eisiau gorbwysleisio'r rhwystrau a wynebwyd gennym ni i gyrraedd y pwynt hwn, ond ni fu'n hawdd creu pedwar cynllun peilot ar wahân gan ddefnyddio gwahanol drefniadau caffael a gwahanol ysgogiadau gwariant y Llywodraeth er mwyn gwneud hynny. Ond rwy'n pwysleisio'n bendant mai'r hyn yr ydym ni'n edrych arno yma yw cynlluniau peilot gwirioneddol, oherwydd fy mod yn derbyn yn llwyr y pwynt y mae'r Aelod yn ei wneud: does dim amheuaeth nad yw hyn yn ymwneud â chael gwell swyddi yn nes at adref - mae'r gair 'nes' yn un mor bwysig - am yr union reswm hwnnw. Nid ydym ni eisiau i bobl deithio'n bell i'r gwaith. Hyd yn oed lle rydym ni'n hwyluso hynny, dydyn ni dal ddim eisiau hynny. Ac mewn gwirionedd, yr hyn y mae'r rhan fwyaf o gymunedau yn yr ardaloedd mwyaf gwledig yng Nghymru, ac weithiau canol y dinasoedd - rwyf hefyd yn cynrychioli ardal canol dinas sydd â phroblemau tebyg - yr hyn y mae ar bobl ei eisiau yw gallu cael swyddi da rownd y gornel o'u tŷ er mwyn iddynt gael cydbwysedd gwaith-bywyd, a gallu rhoi ystyriaeth i'w cyfrifoldebau gofalu a bod eu plant yn gallu mynychu ysgolion lleol ac ati. Felly, nod mawr y cynlluniau peilot hyn yw gweld pa un a ydyn nhw'n gweithio ac, fel y dywedais i, a allwn ni wedyn eu hail-greu mewn cymunedau eraill, efallai fel hybiau cysylltiedig, efallai fel un busnes â nifer o safleoedd - nifer o bosibiliadau. Ac rydym ni wedi gweithio'n agos gydag amrywiaeth eang o randdeiliaid ar draws y Llywodraeth i gyrraedd y fan lle'r ydym ni nawr, ac yn sicr fe fyddaf i'n edrych ymlaen at adrodd yn ôl ar y cynlluniau peilot a'r mater hwn o'r gallu i dyfu yn unol â'r anghenion a pha un a oes modd eu lleoli mewn mannau eraill, a phopeth arall ymhen rhyw flwyddyn, pan fydd gennym rywfaint o ddata oddi wrthyn nhw.