English: Thank you very much. It's good to have the opportunity to talk again about the bid that has been prepared and put forward by Isle of Anglesey County Council and Stena Line to designate Holyhead and Anglesey a free port on behalf of the whole of north Wales. I'll say as a supporter of that bid, and one that's collaborated with the authors, that we need some honesty in terms of this debate, and we need a dose of reality rather than political ideology on the benches opposite, too. It isn't clear to everyone what a free port is. It's fair to say that many have doubts about them, and we've heard some of those doubts today. And it is important to take those doubts seriously, and to challenge constantly - and I have done plenty of that myself - because we know from history that free ports that don't follow clear and rigorous guidelines can bring negative side effects. And we have to remember that there are other ways of making investments that can avoid those kinds of negative effects. So, that's the honesty that I am seeking here. But, for me, what's important is that this bid, within the framework that we have, is a bid that has been put together on the island, led by partners who are used to working together - Stena and the county council; a bid that reflects our ambitions and our interests as a community, whilst at the same time bringing wider economic benefits. But it's also a bid that reflects our values as communities, with its authors, and me as a supporter, having insisted on operating within a set of clear principles. [ Interruption.] If I may continue for a moment. So, yes, we did have to demand and secure a number of concessions and assurance on a number of issues before starting the initiative. There was a financial battle to be won in the first place. Originally, the United Kingdom Government proposed £26 million for every free port in England and £8 million for every one in Wales. I drew attention to how unfair that was; everyone could see that that was entirely unacceptable, and those discussions took place. I was pleased to see that the Welsh Government saw eye to eye with me on this. There was a victory on that call for a level playing field and financial fair play, with £26 million now on the table for Wales too. But there was more than that. There was also a need to know that workers' rights would be safeguarded more, as well as the environment. And through discussion, we had more assurance in that regard in a new Welsh prospectus. But, again, ongoing monitoring will be needed - it will be vital in order to be aware of the potential negative effects - and I'm pleased to hear the Welsh Government also making comments in that regard too.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Mae'n dda cael cyfle eto i siarad am y cais sydd wedi cael ei baratoi a'i gyflwyno gan Gyngor Sir Ynys Môn a Stena Line i ddynodi Caergybi ac Ynys Môn yn borthladd rhydd, a hynny ar ran y gogledd i gyd. Mi ddywedaf i ar y cychwyn fel cefnogwr i'r cais, ac un sydd wedi cydweithio efo'r awduron, mae angen tipyn o onestrwydd o gwmpas y ddadl yma, ac mae eisiau dos o realiti yn hytrach nag ideoleg gwleidyddol ar y meinciau cyferbyn, hefyd. Dydy hi ddim yn eglur i bawb beth ydy porthladd rhydd. Mae'n deg dweud bod gan lawer amheuon amdanyn nhw, ac rydyn ni wedi clywed rhai o'r amheuon hynny heddiw. Ac mae'n bwysig cymryd yr amheuon hynny o ddifri, a herio drwy'r amser - ac dwi wedi gwneud digon o hynny fy hun - achos rydym ni'n gwybod o hanes fod porthladdoedd rhydd sydd ddim yn dilyn rheolau clir a chadarn yn gallu dod â sgil-effeithiau negyddol. Ac mae'n rhaid cofio hefyd fod yna ffyrdd eraill o wneud buddsoddiadau sydd yn gallu osgoi y mathau yna o effeithiau negyddol. Felly, dyna ydy'r gonestrwydd dwi'n chwilio amdano fo. Ond, i fi, beth sy'n bwysig ydy bod y cais yma, o fewn y fframwaith sydd gennym ni, yn gais sydd wedi ei lunio ar yr ynys, dan arweiniad partneriaid sydd wedi hen arfer gweithio efo'i gilydd - y cyngor sir a Stena; cais sydd dwi'n meddwl yn adlewyrchu ein dyheadau ni a'n buddiannau ni fel cymuned, tra, ar yr un pryd, yn dod â buddion economaidd ehangach. Ond hefyd, mae'n gais sydd yn adlewyrchu ein gwerthoedd ni fel cymunedau, efo'i awduron o, a minnau fel cefnogwr, wedi mynnu gweithredu o fewn set o egwyddorion clir. [ Torri ar draws.] Os caf i gario ymlaen am funud fach. Felly, oedd, mi oedd yn rhaid mynnu a chael nifer o gonsesiynau a sicrwydd ar nifer o faterion cyn cychwyn ar y fenter. Mi oedd yna frwydr ariannol i'w hennill yn gyntaf. Yn wreiddiol, mi oedd Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig yn cynnig £26 miliwn i bob porthladd rhydd yn Lloegr ac £8 miliwn i bob un yng Nghymru. Mi dynnais i sylw at ba mor annheg oedd hynny; mi oedd pawb yn gallu gweld bod hynny'n hollol annerbyniol, ac mi ddigwyddodd y trafodaethau. Roeddwn i'n falch bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn gweld llygad yn llygad â fi ar hyn. Mi ddaeth yna fuddugoliaeth ar yr alwad yna am faes chwarae gwastad a chwarae teg ariannol, efo £26 miliwn bellach ar y bwrdd i Gymru hefyd. Ond mi oedd angen mwy na hynny; mi oedd hefyd angen gwybod y byddai hawliau gweithwyr yn cael eu diogelu fwy ynghyd â'r amgylchedd. A drwy drafodaeth hefyd, mi gawsom ni fwy o'r sicrwydd hynny mewn prosbectws Cymreig newydd. Ond hyd yn oed wedyn, mi fydd angen monitro parhaus - mi fydd hynny'n allweddol er mwyn bod yn ymwybodol o'r effeithiau negyddol posib - a dwi'n falch o glywed Llywodraeth Cymru hefyd yn gwneud sylwadau i'r perwyl hwnnw hefyd.