English: May I thank the Counsel General and Brexit Minister for his statement on legislation related to leaving the EU? May I thank him specifically for his detailed analysis of the complex and difficult legislative position that we find ourselves in in exiting the European Union? Now, you mentioned common frameworks, and common frameworks, as you've mentioned on a number of occasions in this Chamber, do mean shared governance, and, of course, require respect between different Governments. It shouldn't be a matter of the Westminster Parliament deciding and every other Parliament on these isles following slavishly in their wake, although, having said that, the outlook isn't particularly promising, as you've set out in this statement of the recent history. This Parliament refused to give its legislative consent to the EU withdrawal agreement Act, just as did the Scottish Parliament and Northern Ireland, but yet the Westminster Parliament proceeded with the withdrawal Act, entirely ignoring all other Parliaments on these isles. Now, that doesn't sound like shared governance to me, and it doesn't sound like the views of other Parliaments on these isles are being respected either, but I do see from your statement that you have already moved on. You have agreed with members of the Westminster Government that that was an exceptional or a unique position in terms of ignoring the views of the devolved Parliaments. But on what basis have you come to that position? Why would we believe that this couldn't happen again in future, or in all future occasions where we see powers being lost or powers being threatened, or that we will be ignored again, as you have admitted you have been ignored over the past three years, at some point in the future when we again complain, that the definition of a singular, specific and exceptional case will not be used again? What assurance can we have that this will not happen time and time again and every time that this Parliament is ignored that it will be a singular, specific, exceptional case? What assurance have you received on that point? Now, of course, there's a great deal of legislation that will need to be passed, as you've mentioned, much of it in devolved areas, such as fisheries, agriculture, environment - all devolved to this place for 20 years. So, what influence do you have, or will you have, on the legislative process from this point onwards in these devolved fields? In leaving the European Union, we don't want to lose any powers that we have traditionally held in this Chamber and have done so over 20 years. Yes, of course, originally under the auspices of the European Union, and now under the auspices of the UK, but we don't want to see any powers lost from this place in those areas that have been devolved for 20 years. And, finally, you also discuss secondary legislation that emerges from these processes, and you've already said that it's difficult to predict exactly how much of that will be required, but how can you ensure that there is improved scrutiny from this Senedd in terms of your work within Government as secondary legislation is passed - statutory instrument consent motions and so on and so forth? Because we've had some difficulty as a legislature in scrutinising what is happening with a broad range of SICMs and so on. So, will the system still be reliant on ordinary backbench Members in this place to push for debates on SICMs, on these secondary legislative consent motions, or will the Welsh Government be more willing and more proactive from here on in than they have been to date in facilitating debates on issues of secondary legislation without using that age-old excuse that time is short or that the burden of work is too great? Thank you very much.
Welsh: A allaf i ddiolch i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol a'r Gweinidog Brexit am ei ddatganiad ar y ddeddfwriaeth yn ymwneud ag ymadael â'r Undeb Ewropeaidd? A gaf i ddiolch yn benodol iddo fo am ei ddadansoddiad manwl o'r sefyllfa ddeddfwriaethol astrus ac anodd braidd rydym ni'n ei hwynebu wrth ymadael â'r Undeb Ewropeaidd? Nawr, rydych chi'n sôn am fframweithiau, ac mae fframweithiau cyffredin yn golygu, fel rydych chi wedi crybwyll sawl tro yn y Siambr yma, rhannu llywodraethiant ac, wrth gwrs, yn golygu parch rhwng gwahanol Lywodraethau. Dylai fod dim rhagor o Senedd San Steffan yn penderfynu a phob Senedd arall yn yr ynysoedd hyn i fod i ddilyn yn slafaidd ufudd, er wedi dweud hynny, nid yw'r rhagolygon yn addawol, fel rydych chi wedi olrhain yn y datganiad yma o'r hanes diweddar. Gwrthododd y Senedd hon roi ei chydsyniad deddfwriaethol i'r Ddeddf cytundeb ymadael â'r Undeb Ewropeaidd, yn union fel yr Alban - fe wnaethant hwy wrthod hefyd - a Gogledd Iwerddon - fe wnaethant hwy wrthod hefyd - ac eto, ymlaen aeth Senedd San Steffan efo'r Ddeddf ymadael, gan lwyr anwybyddu holl Senedd-dai eraill yr ynysoedd yma. Nawr, dydy hynna ddim yn swnio fel rhannu llywodraethiant i fi, na pharchu barn Senedd-dai eraill yr ynysoedd yma, ond dwi'n gweld o'ch datganiad eich bod chi wedi symud ymlaen eisoes. Rydych chi wedi cytuno ag aelodau Llywodraeth San Steffan taw achos eithriadol neu achos unigryw oedd anwybyddu barn ein Senedd-dai datganoledig. Ond ar ba sail, allaf i ofyn? Ar ba sail sydd gennych chi i gredu na all hyn ddigwydd eto, neu bob tro yn y dyfodol y byddwn ni'n gweld colli pwerau neu o dan fygythiad colli pwerau, neu y byddwn yn cael ein hanwybyddu eto, fel rydych chi wedi cyfaddef eich bod chi wedi cael eich anwybyddu dros y tair blynedd diwethaf, rhywbryd yn y dyfodol pan fyddwn ni eto yn cwyno, na fydd y diffiniad o achos eithriadol yna yn cael ei ddefnyddio eto? Pa sicrwydd a allwn ni ei gael na fydd hyn yn digwydd dro ar ôl tro a phob tro y bydd y Senedd yma yn cael ei hanwybyddu ei fod o'n mynd i fod yn achos eithriadol, unigryw arall? Pa sicrwydd ydych chi wedi'i dderbyn ar y pwynt yna? Nawr, wrth gwrs, mae yna gryn dipyn o ddeddfwriaeth sydd angen ei phasio, fel rydych chi wedi crybwyll, a llawer ohoni mewn meysydd sydd wedi'u datganoli, fel pysgodfeydd, amaeth, yr amgylchedd - wedi'u datganoli i fan hyn ers 20 mlynedd. Pa ddylanwad, felly, sydd gennych chi, neu a fydd gennych chi, ar y broses o ddeddfu o hyn ymlaen yn y meysydd datganoledig yma? Wrth adael Ewrop, dydyn ni dim eisiau colli unrhyw bwerau rydym ni'n draddodiadol wedi eu harddel yn y Siambr yma ers 20 mlynedd. Ie, wrth gwrs, o dan adain Ewrop yn wreiddiol a nawr o dan adain y Deyrnas Unedig, ond dydyn ni ddim eisiau gweld crebachu pwerau o fan hyn mewn meysydd sydd wedi'u datganoli i fan hyn ers 20 mlynedd. Ac, yn olaf, cawsoch chi'r drafodaeth hefyd ynglŷn â'r ddeddfwriaeth eilradd sydd yn deillio o'r prosesau yma. Mae'n anodd iawn, fel rydych chi wedi darogan eisoes, rhagweld faint yn union o hynna sydd yn mynd i ddigwydd, ond sut fyddwch chi'n gallu sicrhau gwella craffu ar ran y Senedd yma o'ch gwaith chi yn y Llywodraeth, wrth basio deddfwriaeth eilradd - SICMs ac ati? Achos rydym ni wedi cael cryn anhawster fel deddfwrfa i allu craffu ar beth sydd yn digwydd efo ystod eang o SICMs ac ati. A fydd y drefn yn dal yn ddibynnol ar Aelodau cyffredin meinciau cefn yn y lle yma i wthio am drafodaeth ar SICMs - ar y cydsyniadau deddfwriaeth eilradd yma - neu a fydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn fwy parod ac yn fwy rhagweithiol o hyn ymlaen nag y maent wedi bod i fyny at nawr i hwyluso dadleuon ar faterion eilradd deddfwriaethol heb ddefnyddio'r esgus oesol bod amser yn brin neu fod baich pwysau gwaith yn ormodol? Diolch yn fawr.