English: You are here every Tuesday. We're all here every Tuesday. But we're also making the more general point that you're here, and you spoke up in favour of the Conservative Prime Minister's actions in Syria, and we would expect you to be here to tell us why you did that. And I think a lot of your Labour Members would expect you to tell us why you did that as well. It's not that we're the people who hold you to account about this. We are here on behalf of the people of Wales, and when the UK Government commits finances, as Leanne Wood put out at the start of this debate, commits our troops and men and women in the armed forces, from Wales potentially, and risks homeland security by taking offensive action abroad, which is a point that Jeremy Corbyn has made time and time again, then surely that affects us here in Wales, and we're right to debate that. We don't decide these things, but we're right to debate them because we send a message back to our constituents who, as has been raised by several Members - Bethan Sayed and Mick Antoniw as well, I think, made this point - several constituents have contacted us to say, 'Where's your moral fibre? Where do you stand on these issues?' You may not always please constituents when you're an Assembly Member dealing with Westminster issues, but they want to hear from you. So, from this Chamber we send back those messages, and we send back either our support or not as the case may be. I think that two themes have emerged from this debate. First of all, there's the issue of whether Parliament should have been recalled to decide this, and the convention that Robin Cook so powerfully - and I was with Julie Morgan, as was Adam Price as well, in Westminster when he made his resignation speech, and when he made that famous convention. But as Mick Antoniw has set out, has reminded us, really, conventions are very strange things in the British constitution. They can be broken as well as set, and what we are concerned about here is that the Cook convention has been broken by this decision to take offensive action - not defensive action, but offensive action - in a foreign country as part of an alliance without recourse to Parliament. When you see conventions broken like that, what price the Sewel convention? What price our debates around frameworks and Brexit and everything that emerges from that, when we see that the Westminster Government acts in a particular way? So, there's that issue that I think has been very strongly put forward. Then there's the action itself. I'd like to thank particularly Mike Hedges and Julie Morgan for their contributions on this. It crystallises in a simple question: do we today feel that the civilians in Syria are better protected, better looked after, have a safer future following this strike? [ Interruption.] An intervention from a sedentary position says possibly they are. I don't accept that, but it's an argument to make. But I think the majority view in here, I sense, would be that we don't really accept that. So we need to ask: what has this offensive action been taken for? Well, it's really been taken for geopolitical reasons. It's been taken to support Trump, to look like that we are in association with Trump. When that dead hand of Trump went onto Theresa May's hand and he led her down the garden path - that's where it started, this thought that we have to associate ourselves with a very erratic American foreign policy. Now, whatever you thought of the neo-cons in Iraq and Afghanistan, and I didn't think much of them - . [ Interruption.] In a second, if I may. I didn't think much of them. It was clear what that foreign policy was. The difficulty was, of course, they didn't have any policy for what happened to the countries after military intervention, but it was clear what the path of military intervention was. I don't think we see that from President Trump and, therefore, I don't think that the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom should be associating herself with such an erratic foreign policy. I'll give way to David Melding.
Welsh: Rydych yma bob dydd Mawrth. Rydym i gyd yma bob dydd Mawrth. Ond wrth gwrs, rydym hefyd yn gwneud y pwynt mwy cyffredinol eich bod chi yma, ac fe siaradoch o blaid ymosodiadau'r Prif Weinidog Ceidwadol yn Syria, a byddem yn disgwyl ichi fod yma i ddweud wrthym pam y gwnaethoch hynny. A chredaf y byddai llawer o'ch Aelodau Llafur yn disgwyl i chi ddweud wrthym pam y gwnaethoch hynny hefyd. Nid ni yw'r bobl sy'n eich dwyn i gyfrif am hyn. Rydym yma ar ran pobl Cymru, a phan fo Llywodraeth y DU yn ymrwymo cyllid, fel y nododd Leanne Wood ar ddechrau'r ddadl hon, yn ymrwymo ein milwyr a'n dynion a'n menywod yn y lluoedd arfog, o Gymru o bosibl, ac yn peryglu diogelwch y wlad hon drwy gyflawni ymosodiadau dramor, sy'n bwynt y mae Jeremy Corbyn wedi ei wneud dro ar ôl tro, yna does bosibl nad yw hynny'n effeithio arnom yma yng Nghymru, a'n bod ni'n iawn i drafod hynny. Nid ni sy'n penderfynu'r pethau hyn, ond rydym yn iawn i'w trafod oherwydd rydym yn anfon neges yn ôl at ein hetholwyr sydd, fel y nododd nifer o'r Aelodau - fe wnaeth Bethan Sayed, a Mick Antoniw hefyd, y pwynt hwn rwy'n credu - fod nifer o etholwyr wedi cysylltu â ni i ddweud , 'Ble mae eich moesoldeb? Beth yw eich safbwynt ar y materion hyn?' Efallai na fyddwch bob amser yn plesio eich etholwyr pan fyddwch yn Aelod Cynulliad yn ymdrin â materion San Steffan, ond maent eisiau clywed gennych. Felly, o'r Siambr hon rydym yn anfon y negeseuon hynny'n ôl, a byddwn yn anfon yn ôl naill ai ein cefnogaeth neu beidio fel y bo'n berthnasol. Credaf fod dwy thema wedi dod i'r amlwg o'r ddadl hon. Yn gyntaf oll, mae'r mater ynglŷn ag a ddylai'r Senedd fod wedi'i galw'n ôl i benderfynu hyn, a'r confensiwn a wnaed mor rymus gan Robin Cook - ac roeddwn gyda Julie Morgan, fel yr oedd Adam Price hefyd, yn San Steffan pan wnaeth ei araith ymddiswyddo, a phan wnaeth y confensiwn enwog hwnnw. Ond fel y mae Mick Antoniw wedi nodi, wedi ein hatgoffa mewn gwirionedd, mae confensiynau'n bethau rhyfedd iawn yn y cyfansoddiad Prydeinig. Gellir eu torri yn ogystal â'u gosod, a'r hyn rydym yn pryderu amdano yma yw bod confensiwn Cook wedi'i dorri gan y penderfyniad hwn i gyflawni ymosodiad - nid gweithred amddiffynnol, ond ymosodiad - mewn gwlad dramor fel rhan o gynghrair heb droi at y Senedd. Pan fyddwch yn gweld confensiynau'n cael eu torri yn y fath fodd, beth yw gwerth confensiwn Sewel? Pa werth sydd i'n dadleuon ynghylch fframweithiau a Brexit a phopeth a ddaw o hynny, pan welwn fod Llywodraeth San Steffan yn gweithredu mewn ffordd benodol? Felly, rwy'n credu bod y mater hwnnw wedi ei roi gerbron yn gryf iawn. Yna mae'r ymosodiad ei hun. Hoffwn ddiolch yn arbennig i Mike Hedges a Julie Morgan am eu cyfraniadau ar hyn. Caiff ei grisialu mewn cwestiwn syml: a ydym yn teimlo heddiw fod y bobl yn Syria yn cael eu diogelu'n well, yn cael gofal gwell, yn edrych ymlaen at ddyfodol mwy diogel yn dilyn yr ymosodiad? [ Torri ar draws.] Mae ymyriad ar eich eistedd yn nodi efallai eu bod. Nid wyf yn derbyn hynny, ond mae'n ddadl i'w gwneud. Ond credaf mai barn y mwyafrif yma, rwy'n synhwyro, fyddai nad ydym yn derbyn hynny mewn gwirionedd. Felly mae angen inni ofyn: pam y cyflawnwyd yr ymosodiad hwn? Wel, mewn gwirionedd fe'i cyflawnwyd am resymau geowleidyddol. Fe'i cyflawnwyd i gefnogi Trump, i edrych fel pe baem wedi ein cysylltu â Trump. Pan aeth llaw farw Trump i law Theresa May i'w thywys ar gyfeiliorn - dyna lle y dechreuodd y syniad hwn fod yn rhaid inni fod wedi ein cysylltu â pholisi tramor Americanaidd anwadal iawn. Nawr, beth bynnag yr oeddech yn ei feddwl o'r neoconiaid yn Irac ac Affganistan, ac nid oeddwn yn meddwl llawer ohonynt - . [ Torri ar draws.] Mewn eiliad, os caf. Nid oeddwn i'n meddwl llawer ohonynt. Roedd hi'n glir beth oedd y polisi tramor hwnnw. Yr anhawster, wrth gwrs, oedd nad oedd ganddynt unrhyw bolisi ar gyfer yr hyn a ddigwyddai i'r gwledydd ar ôl ymyrraeth filwrol, ond roedd hi'n glir beth oedd llwybr ymyrraeth filwrol. Nid wyf yn meddwl y gwelwn hynny gan yr Arlywydd Trump ac felly, nid wyf yn credu y dylai Prif Weinidog y Deyrnas Unedig gysylltu'n rhy agos â pholisi tramor afreolus o'r fath. Fe ildiaf i David Melding.