techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Since the outbreak of the pandemic, there have been seven meetings of the finance Ministers' quadrilateral, where we have discussed a range of issues, including the fiscal response to the crisis, the UK Government's autumn budget and the forthcoming comprehensive spending review.
Welsh: Ers dechrau'r pandemig, cafwyd saith cyfarfod pedairochrog rhwng y Gweinidogion cyllid, lle buom yn trafod amrywiaeth o faterion, gan gynnwys yr ymateb cyllidol i'r argyfwng, cyllideb hydref Llywodraeth y DU a'r adolygiad cynhwysfawr o wariant sydd ar y ffordd.
English: Thank you for that answer. But at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, Welsh Government capped the eligibility scheme for business rate holiday and excluded all retail, hospitality and leisure premises with a rateable value of more than £0.5 million. And that targeted approach enabled Welsh Government to add £100 million to the economic resilience fund that, in turn, helped safeguard thousands of jobs and support thousands of small and medium-sized enterprises during that period. That didn't happen in England, and they don't have an equivalent economic resilience fund, so many of their businesses lost out. So, could I ask you, Minister, when you have your round of talks with the UK Chancellor, will you ask him to take a more targeted response in the autumn budget in order to save those most-at-risk jobs and businesses by a catch-all scheme, whereby you have a situation that large supermarkets, who had a rise and an increase in their profits, benefited at the cost of those smaller businesses?
Welsh: Diolch am eich ateb. Ond ar ddechrau pandemig COVID-19, capiodd Llywodraeth Cymru y cynllun cymhwysedd ar gyfer seibiant ardrethi busnes a hepgor pob safle manwerthu, lletygarwch a hamdden gyda gwerth trethadwy o fwy na £0.5 miliwn. Ac roedd dull wedi'i dargedu o'r fath yn galluogi Llywodraeth Cymru i ychwanegu £100 miliwn at y gronfa cadernid economaidd a helpodd, yn ei thro, i ddiogelu miloedd o swyddi a chefnogi miloedd o fusnesau bach a chanolig eu maint yn ystod y cyfnod hwnnw. Ni ddigwyddodd hynny yn Lloegr, ac nid oes ganddynt gronfa cadernid economaidd gyfatebol, felly roedd llawer o'u busnesau ar eu colled. Felly, a gaf fi ofyn ichi, Weinidog, pan fyddwch yn cael eich cylch o drafodaethau gyda Changhellor y DU, a wnewch chi ofyn iddo fabwysiadu ymateb wedi'i dargedu'n well yng nghyllideb yr hydref er mwyn achub y swyddi a'r busnesau sydd fwyaf mewn perygl mewn cynllun dal popeth, lle mae gennych sefyllfa sydd wedi golygu bod archfarchnadoedd mawr, a welodd eu helw'n cynyddu, wedi elwa ar draul y busnesau llai hynny?
English: I thank Joyce Watson for this question and for her ongoing and evident concern for small and medium-sized enterprises, particularly, I have to say, in the more rural parts of Wales. And Joyce is absolutely right to point to the fact that businesses in Wales have access to the most generous package of support anywhere in the United Kingdom. So, the Office for National Statistics have recently published some data that shows that 34 per cent of businesses in Wales have benefited from support, as compared to 21 per cent in Scotland and 14 per cent in England. So, that really does show the added value that devolution has brought to the response to this crisis. And, again, Joyce is right that we do need a much more targeted approach now, as we move into the next phase of addressing the crisis, looking particularly at those sectors of society that have suffered greatly and continue to suffer as a result of the crisis. Hospitality, tourism, for example, stand out, as does aerospace - Jack Sargeant raised that sector in the Chamber just yesterday - and, of course, the automotive industry, the steel industry and so on - all industries that are absolutely vital to Wales, and of which we have a greater share than elsewhere in the UK. So, I give my assurance that I will absolutely be continuing to press for that more targeted approach as we move through our response to the crisis.
Welsh: Diolch i Joyce Watson am y cwestiwn hwn ac am ei phryder parhaus ac amlwg am fusnesau bach a chanolig eu maint, yn enwedig, rhaid imi ddweud, yn y rhannau mwy gwledig o Gymru. Ac mae Joyce yn llygad ei lle wrth dynnu sylw at y ffaith bod gan fusnesau yng Nghymru fynediad at y pecyn cymorth mwyaf hael yn unman yn y Deyrnas Unedig. Felly, mae'r Swyddfa Ystadegau Gwladol wedi cyhoeddi data yn ddiweddar sy'n dangos bod 34 y cant o fusnesau yng Nghymru wedi elwa o gymorth, o'i gymharu â 21 y cant yn yr Alban a 14 y cant yn Lloegr. Felly, mae hynny'n dangos yn glir y gwerth ychwanegol y mae datganoli wedi'i gyfrannu at yr ymateb i'r argyfwng hwn. Ac unwaith eto, mae Joyce yn iawn fod arnom angen dull o weithredu sy'n targedu'n llawer gwell yn awr, wrth inni symud i'r cam nesaf o fynd i'r afael â'r argyfwng, gan edrych yn benodol ar y sectorau mewn cymdeithas sydd wedi dioddef yn fawr ac sy'n parhau i ddioddef o ganlyniad i'r argyfwng. Mae lletygarwch a thwristiaeth, er enghraifft, yn amlwg, fel y mae awyrofod - nododd Jack Sargeant y sector hwnnw yn y Siambr ddoe ddiwethaf - ac wrth gwrs, y diwydiant modurol, y diwydiant dur ac yn y blaen - yr holl ddiwydiannau sy'n gwbl hanfodol i Gymru, a'r diwydiannau y mae gennym gyfran uwch ohonynt nag mewn mannau eraill yn y DU. Felly, rwy'n rhoi sicrwydd y byddaf yn parhau i bwyso am ddull wedi'i dargedu'n well wrth inni symud drwy ein hymateb i'r argyfwng.
English: Minister, I'm looking for some detail from you about what you're trying to secure by way of further consequentials in that budget from further education spending. Further education is obviously going to be one of those sectors that we rely on to help us recover from COVID, and while the specific pressures are obviously for another Minister, the £23 million that came from the Welsh Government's COVID pot, welcome though it is, is only partial compensation for the £47 million education budget cut, which was inflicted in order to help feed that COVID pot, and it doesn't really completely reflect the additional COVID consequentials from the UK Government. Can you commit to making it clear where consequentials have come in for FE, as a result of the autumn budget, and also make it clear for us to see whether more, the same or less ends up being committed net by Welsh Government?
Welsh: Weinidog, rwy'n chwilio am fanylion gennych am yr hyn rydych yn ceisio'i sicrhau ar ffurf symiau canlyniadol pellach yn y gyllideb o wariant ar addysg bellach. Mae'n amlwg y bydd addysg bellach yn un o'r sectorau rydym yn dibynnu arno i'n helpu i ymadfer ar ôl COVID, er mai mater i Weinidog arall yw'r pwysau penodol wrth gwrs, ac er mor dda yw ei gael, dim ond yn rhannol y mae'r £23 miliwn a ddaeth o gronfa COVID Llywodraeth Cymru yn gwneud iawn am y toriad o £47 miliwn i'r gyllideb addysg, toriad a achoswyd er mwyn helpu i fwydo'r pot COVID hwnnw, ac nid yw'n adlewyrchu'n llwyr y symiau canlyniadol COVID ychwanegol gan Lywodraeth y DU. A wnewch chi ymrwymo i ddweud yn glir ble y cafwyd symiau canlyniadol ar gyfer addysg bellach o ganlyniad i gyllideb yr hydref, a dweud yn glir hefyd inni allu gweld a yw Llywodraeth Cymru yn ymrwymo i swm net sydd yr un fath, yn fwy, neu'n llai?
English: Yes, I'm very happy to be extremely transparent in terms of the data on consequentials that we receive from the UK Government. So, very recently I wrote to the Finance Committee giving the latest detail of the consequentials that Welsh Government has received, and in relation to what UK Government spend. Although I will make the point that, of course, the Welsh Government isn't an administrative arm of the UK Government, and money that does come, as a result of consequentials, is deployed in relation to particular Welsh pressures and Welsh priorities and Welsh concerns. I'll also add that we were able to negotiate with the UK Treasury an agreement that we would have consequentials in advance of announcements that have been made across the border in England. So, our total consequentials thus far have been £4 billion, but for part of that we don't yet know to what those consequentials relate, and that was something we were able to negotiate because it did give us the ability, then, in Wales to provide additional funding to health, additional funding to local government, to give them the certainty and ability to plan, rather than waiting for each and every small announcement from the UK Government. So, that's been a really good example of good working between Welsh Government and HM Treasury, although I think there's some way to go yet in terms of the flexibilities that we're seeking.
Welsh: Rwy'n hapus iawn i fod yn hynod dryloyw ynglŷn â'r data ar symiau canlyniadol a gawn gan Lywodraeth y DU. Felly, yn ddiweddar iawn ysgrifennais at y Pwyllgor Cyllid yn rhoi manylion diweddaraf y symiau canlyniadol y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi'u cael, ac mewn perthynas â'r hyn y mae Llywodraeth y DU yn ei wario. Er hynny, rwy'n gwneud y pwynt, wrth gwrs, nad cangen weinyddol o Lywodraeth y DU yw Llywodraeth Cymru, ac mae'r arian a ddaw o ganlyniad i symiau canlyniadol yn cael ei ddefnyddio mewn perthynas â phwysau penodol ar Gymru a blaenoriaethau a phryderon Cymreig. Ychwanegaf hefyd ein bod wedi gallu negodi cytundeb gyda Thrysorlys y DU y byddem yn cael symiau canlyniadol cyn y cyhoeddiadau a wnaed dros y ffin yn Lloegr. Felly, mae cyfanswm ein symiau canlyniadol hyd yma wedi bod yn £4 biliwn, ond nid ydym yn gwybod eto ar gyfer beth y mae rhan o'r symiau canlyniadol hynny, ac roedd hynny'n rhywbeth y bu'n bosibl i ni ei negodi am ei fod yn ein galluogi ni yng Nghymru i ddarparu cyllid ychwanegol i iechyd, cyllid ychwanegol i lywodraeth leol, i roi sicrwydd iddynt a'u galluogi i gynllunio, yn hytrach nag aros am bob cyhoeddiad bach gan Lywodraeth y DU. Felly, mae hynny wedi bod yn enghraifft dda iawn o weithio da rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru a Thrysorlys EM, er fy mod yn credu bod cryn dipyn o ffordd i fynd eto i gael yr hyblygrwydd a geisiwn.
English: Minister, 2020 has highlighted how vulnerable our economy actually is - vulnerable to COVID and vulnerable to a changing climate. We are woefully unprepared to cope with such shocks to our systems. What discussions have you had with colleagues across all four nations about ensuring funding goes towards mitigating the risks of future pandemics and the challenges we face from climate change?
Welsh: Weinidog, mae 2020 wedi amlygu pa mor agored i niwed yw ein heconomi mewn gwirionedd - agored i COVID ac agored i hinsawdd sy'n newid. Nid ydym yn barod o gwbl ar gyfer ymdopi â'r fath sioc i'n systemau. Pa drafodaethau a gawsoch gyda chydweithwyr ar draws y pedair gwlad ynglŷn â sicrhau bod cyllid yn mynd tuag at liniaru risgiau pandemig yn y dyfodol a'r heriau sy'n ein hwynebu yn sgil newid yn yr hinsawdd?
English: I'm really grateful to Caroline for highlighting the fact that, even though we've been dealing with a pandemic, which has been all-consuming in so many ways, actually, that huge issue of climate change hasn't gone away, and, absolutely, we must be continuing to address it. So, our mind is very much focused, as we continue to address the acute end of the pandemic, also on looking ahead to the recovery and the reconstruction. And the discussions that we're having right across Government are very much framed within the lens of our Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015, but with that particular focus on how we can create a green and fair recovery. I know that Jeremy Miles has been working very hard across the summer, engaging with stakeholders right across Welsh life to better understand the concerns and ideas there, and he'll be saying something more about the particular steps that we will take in terms of that recovery shortly. But I can give you reassurance that the decarbonisation agenda, the green agenda, is at the heart of that.
Welsh: Rwy'n ddiolchgar iawn i Caroline am nodi, er inni fod yn ymdrin â phandemig sydd wedi mynnu ein holl sylw mewn cynifer o ffyrdd, nad yw problem enfawr newid yn yr hinsawdd wedi diflannu, ac yn sicr, rhaid inni barhau i fynd i'r afael â'r broblem honno. Felly, wrth inni barhau i fynd i'r afael â phen acíwt y pandemig, rydym yn rhoi cryn dipyn o ffocws hefyd ar edrych ymlaen at yr adferiad a'r ailadeiladu. Ac mae'r trafodaethau rydym yn eu cael ar draws y Llywodraeth wedi'u fframio'n bendant gan ein Deddf Llesiant Cenedlaethau'r Dyfodol (Cymru) 2015, ond gyda ffocws penodol ar sut y gallwn greu adferiad gwyrdd a theg. Gwn fod Jeremy Miles wedi bod yn gweithio'n galed iawn dros yr haf yn ymgysylltu â rhanddeiliaid ym mhob agwedd ar fywyd yng Nghymru i ddeall yn well y pryderon a'r syniadau sydd i'w cael, a bydd yn sôn mwy am y camau penodol y byddwn yn eu cymryd tuag at yr adferiad hwnnw maes o law. Ond gallaf roi sicrwydd i chi fod yr agenda datgarboneiddio, yr agenda werdd, yn ganolog i hynny.
English: Robust appraisal, management and assurance are the core governance principles of the projects funded by the Welsh Government. This includes assessment and management of the risks posed to the project, which is underpinned by an independent review mechanism of the projects performance at key stages in its life-cycle.
Welsh: Arfarnu, rheolaeth a sicrwydd cadarn yw egwyddorion llywodraethu craidd y prosiectau a ariennir gan Lywodraeth Cymru. Mae hyn yn cynnwys asesu a rheoli'r risgiau a achosir i'r prosiect, sy'n seiliedig ar fecanwaith adolygu annibynnol o berfformiad y prosiectau ar gyfnodau allweddol yn eu cylch bywyd.
English: Well, thank you very much for that response, but you will, of course, be aware of the recent report by Audit Wales on Ysbyty Glan Clwyd, which went £60 million over budget. Now, there is criticism made of the health board there, but it's also very critical of the governance arrangements of the Welsh Government. Despite the clear concerns expressed about the business plan, and the fact that the business case wasn't sufficiently strong - despite that, the plan was approved. Of course, if the Welsh Government and the health board had had that clear business case in place before approving that plan, then it's unlikely that it would have overspent. So, who takes responsibility for that failure?
Welsh: Wel, diolch i chi am yr ateb, ond mi fyddwch chi, wrth gwrs, yn ymwybodol o adroddiad Archwilio Cymru i waith adnewyddu yn Ysbyty Glan Clwyd yn ddiweddar. Roedd e'n waith a aeth £60 miliwn dros gyllideb. Nawr, mae yna gerydd amlwg i'r bwrdd iechyd yn yr adroddiad hwnnw, ond dyw Llywodraeth Cymru, wrth gwrs, ddim yn dod allan ohoni'n dda chwaith. Mae'r adroddiad yn feirniadol iawn o'r trefniadau llywodraethiant, ac er gwaethaf bod pryderon clir wedi'u mynegi am y cynllun busnes, ac nad oedd yr achos busnes yn ddigon cryf - er gwaethaf hynny, fe gafodd y cynllun ei gymeradwyo beth bynnag. Nawr, pe byddai'r Llywodraeth a'r bwrdd iechyd, wrth gwrs, wedi dilyn y rheolau o gael cynllun busnes clir cyn cymeradwyo'r project, yna mae yna le i gredu y byddai'r cynllun efallai ddim wedi gorwario i'r graddau y gwnaeth e. Felly, fy nghwestiwn i, Weinidog, yw: pwy sy'n cymryd y cyfrifoldeb am y methiant yna?
English: Llyr Gruffydd is right to point to what was a critical report from the Wales Audit Office. But it is important at the same time to recognise that the Welsh Government had already taken steps to improve its arrangements for approving business cases before the funding problems at Ysbyty Glan Clwyd came to light. And further improvements in Welsh Government processes have been embedded, reflecting the outcomes of that review into this project. So, further Welsh Government internal audit work undertaken in 2014 stated that there was no evidence to suggest that the capital estates and facilities did not discharge their function with monitoring the project, and it's very important as well to recognise that, in 2017, the Auditor General for Wales published a report that was called 'Implementation of the NHS Finances (Wales) Act 2014', and within that report there was recognition of the steps that we have taken in Welsh Government, and steps taken by the NHS capital estates and facilities team to significantly strengthen its review of capital projects. And the report said that there are significant lessons and good practice that can be learnt from the approach taken in the Welsh Government's NHS capital programme. So, while I would absolutely acknowledge those issues that were highlighted in the report, it is also important, I think, to acknowledge the progress and improvement that has happened since.
Welsh: Mae Llyr Gruffydd yn iawn i dynnu sylw at adroddiad beirniadol gan Swyddfa Archwilio Cymru. Ond mae'n bwysig cydnabod ar yr un pryd fod Llywodraeth Cymru eisoes wedi cymryd camau i wella ei threfniadau ar gyfer cymeradwyo achosion busnes cyn i'r problemau ariannu yn Ysbyty Glan Clwyd ddod i'r amlwg. Ac mae gwelliannau pellach ym mhrosesau Llywodraeth Cymru wedi'u hymgorffori, gan adlewyrchu canlyniadau'r adolygiad o'r prosiect. Felly, nododd gwaith archwilio mewnol pellach a wnaeth Llywodraeth Cymru yn 2014 nad oedd unrhyw dystiolaeth i awgrymu nad oedd yr ystadau a chyfleusterau cyfalaf yn cyflawni eu swyddogaeth o ran monitro'r prosiect, ac mae'n bwysig iawn cydnabod hefyd fod Archwilydd Cyffredinol Cymru, yn 2017, wedi cyhoeddi adroddiad o'r enw 'Gweithredu Deddf Cyllid y GIG (Cymru) 2014' , ac yn yr adroddiad hwnnw, cydnabuwyd y camau a roddwyd ar waith yn Llywodraeth Cymru, a'r camau a gymerwyd gan dîm ystadau a chyfleusterau cyfalaf y GIG i gryfhau ei adolygiad o brosiectau cyfalaf yn sylweddol. A dywedodd yr adroddiad fod cryn dipyn o wersi ac arferion da y gellir eu dysgu o'r dull o weithredu a fabwysiadwyd yn rhaglen gyfalaf y GIG Llywodraeth Cymru. Felly, er y byddwn yn llwyr gydnabod y materion y tynnwyd sylw atynt yn yr adroddiad, credaf ei bod hefyd yn bwysig cydnabod y cynnydd a'r gwelliant sydd wedi digwydd ers hynny.
English: Unfortunately Minister, this isn't a one-off, is it, because the Wales audit office has repeatedly highlighted areas of public expenditure where the money either was being wasted or failed to deliver a notable outcome? So, we can refer to, for example, the rural development grant or Communities First - those are two that immediately spring to mind. Now, I understand and appreciate that it's down to individual Ministers to decide on their spending portfolios, but as far as you are concerned, as the finance Minister, is it not your role to ensure that value for money is achieved and public money is not wasted? So, please, could you outline the role that you play in ensuring that portfolio holders spend their budgets appropriately and accountably, and how do you and your department help to steer that ship back onto the right course if you see that they are not doing so?
Welsh: Yn anffodus, Weinidog, nid un waith y digwyddodd hyn oherwydd mae swyddfa archwilio Cymru wedi tynnu sylw dro ar ôl tro at feysydd gwariant cyhoeddus lle roedd yr arian naill ai'n cael ei wastraffu neu ei fod wedi methu sicrhau canlyniad a nodwyd? Felly, gallwn gyfeirio, er enghraifft, at y grant datblygu gwledig neu Cymunedau yn Gyntaf - mae'r rheini'n ddau sy'n dod i'r meddwl ar unwaith. Nawr, rwy'n deall ac yn derbyn mai mater i Weinidogion unigol yw penderfynu ar eu portffolios gwario, ond o'ch rhan chi, fel Gweinidog cyllid, onid eich rôl chi yw sicrhau bod gwerth am arian yn cael ei gyflawni ac nad yw arian cyhoeddus yn cael ei wastraffu? Felly, os gwelwch yn dda, a allech amlinellu'r rôl rydych chi'n ei chwarae yn sicrhau bod deiliaid portffolios yn gwario eu cyllidebau'n briodol ac yn gyfrifol, a sut rydych chi a'ch adran yn helpu i lywio'r llong honno'n ôl i'r cyfeiriad cywir os gwelwch nad ydynt yn gwneud hynny?
English: I'm really grateful for this opportunity to highlight some of the work within the COVID context that we've been doing to ensure value for money and affordability in every proposal that has been brought forward through the COVID-19 reserve, which, of course, is the funding that is behind everything that we've done to respond to the crisis. So, every single day, at the start of the crisis, I convened a team that looked at every single bid that was coming forward from colleagues across Welsh Government - so, additional funding for the NHS, funding for free school meals, funding to support local authorities with their loss of income. Every single bid that related to our response to COVID has come through that particular group, where we provide that additional layer of surety and that additional layer of robust scrutiny to ensure that we are making decisions that have value for money at their heart and, of course, affordability at their heart too. So, that group has met probably close to 100 times now since the start of the crisis, and that's all been about interrogating every single bid that comes forward from any part of Government to seek additional funding to respond to the crisis and to provide that additional layer. So, that's very much, I think, a process that I hope will give people confidence that, when these decisions are being taken, and taken very rapidly, there is an additional layer of probity applied to those decisions.
Welsh: Rwy'n ddiolchgar iawn am y cyfle hwn i dynnu sylw at rywfaint o'r gwaith y buom yn ei wneud yng nghyd-destun COVID i sicrhau gwerth am arian a fforddiadwyedd ym mhob cynnig a gyflwynwyd drwy gronfa wrth gefn COVID-19, sef wrth gwrs, y cyllid sy'n sail i bopeth y buom yn ei wneud i ymateb i'r argyfwng. Felly, bob dydd ar ddechrau'r argyfwng, deuthum â thîm at ei gilydd i edrych ar bob cais unigol a gâi ei gyflwyno gan gyd-Aelodau ar draws Llywodraeth Cymru - felly, cyllid ychwanegol i'r GIG, cyllid ar gyfer prydau ysgol am ddim, cyllid i gefnogi awdurdodau lleol a oedd yn colli incwm. Daeth pob cais unigol a oedd yn gysylltiedig â'n hymateb i COVID drwy'r grŵp penodol hwnnw, lle rydym yn darparu'r haen ychwanegol honno o sicrwydd a'r haen ychwanegol honno o graffu cadarn i sicrhau ein bod yn gwneud penderfyniadau sydd â gwerth am arian, a fforddiadwyedd hefyd wrth gwrs, yn ganolog iddynt. Felly, mae'n debyg fod y grŵp hwnnw wedi cyfarfod yn agos at 100 gwaith bellach ers dechrau'r argyfwng, ac mae hynny i gyd wedi ymwneud ag archwilio pob cais unigol a gyflwynir o unrhyw ran o'r Llywodraeth am gyllid ychwanegol i ymateb i'r argyfwng ac i ddarparu'r haen ychwanegol honno. Felly, credaf fod honno'n broses a fydd yn rhoi hyder i bobl, pan fydd y penderfyniadau hyn yn cael eu gwneud, ac yn cael eu gwneud yn gyflym iawn, fod haen ychwanegol o uniondeb ynghlwm wrth y penderfyniadau hynny.
English: Minister, as we've already heard from these questions, one of the benefits of the governance of public projects in Wales by the Welsh Government is that there is direct accountability here on the floor of the Senedd and close to the people of Wales, and that's the way it should be. It also means that projects are seen through the paradigm of Welsh policy, including the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015. So does she have any concerns with the idea of quite distant Whitehall Ministers and Whitehall mandarins tramping across Wales in their size 10 boots and distributing largesse in future, without that close-to-the-people accountability and without taking account of the policy framework in Wales?
Welsh: Weinidog, fel rydym eisoes wedi clywed o'r cwestiynau hyn, un o fanteision llywodraethu prosiectau cyhoeddus yng Nghymru gan Lywodraeth Cymru yw bod atebolrwydd uniongyrchol yma ar lawr y Senedd ac yn agos at bobl Cymru, a dyna'r ffordd y dylai fod. Mae hefyd yn golygu bod prosiectau'n cael eu gweld drwy baradeim polisi Cymreig, gan gynnwys Deddf Llesiant Cenedlaethau'r Dyfodol (Cymru) 2015. Felly a oes ganddi unrhyw bryderon ynglŷn â'r syniad o Weinidogion eithaf pell i ffwrdd yn Whitehall a mandariniaid Whitehall yn sathru ar draws Cymru yn eu hesgidiau maint 10 ac yn gwasgaru eu haelioni yn y dyfodol, heb atebolrwydd agos at y bobl a heb ystyried y fframwaith polisi yng Nghymru?