English: Thank you, Minister, for the statement, and I do recognise the great work that you have been doing on this over the past few months. I do think the pandemic has made a number of people realise that we do need to upgrade the right to a home to be a human right and that it's something that can have an impact on everyone in society. I do welcome your commitment to seek to ensure that nobody returns to the streets, but your statement refers to placing people in temporary accommodation in certain areas in order to achieve this, when it's clear that we need a long-term solution. I know that you are looking for a long-term solution to this, but I do have some concern that there has been haste in moving some people from the streets, which has led to using inappropriate facilities in some cases. For example, I've heard anecdotal evidence of people, following a damaging relationship, being placed in emergency accommodation with people who had drug abuse problems. Clearly, that wasn't a healthy situation for anyone. So, I'd ask you to look again at the options that councils have in order to ensure that appropriate accommodation is available. And I do see that a number of councils have been working very hard on this over the past few months. In addition to that, I would like to see a pathway to ensure that emergency accommodation is only used temporarily and that we do have long-term solutions for people who find themselves homeless. Now, in turning to the detail in terms of the 'no evictions' measures, which you mentioned in your statement, we welcome the expansion of this, but I do have concerns about the proposal to reduce the notice period for anti-social behaviour and domestic abuse. Can you give us an assurance that the priority in this case will be ensuring that people who are evicted are given alternative accommodation and that they are given assistance with the problems that they have? Now, obviously this is a complex issue, I understand that, and there are a number of agencies that will be involved, but these are the most complex cases that need the greatest amount of support. I also want an assurance on the tenancy saver loan scheme. I'm not sure that increasing the debts of people who are likely to find themselves in difficult financial situations, perhaps, for many years will truly resolve the problem. Isn't it unfair that landlords are having bail-outs, in a way, from Government when many sectors aren't? So, I would like to know what safeguards are in place to ensure that some landlords don't take advantage of this initiative, just to throw tenants out once the restrictions are removed. To conclude, I would like to note an issue that isn't dealt with here that I would have liked to have seen it included in the statement, namely the shortage of social and affordable housing. Yes, the core numbers are increasing, but they are falling far short of what is required. The elephant in the room, if I can say that, is that we have a planning system that has profit assurance built into it, namely developers can use the Planning Inspectorate to prevent local authorities from having the deserved share of affordable housing in developments, and your Government hasn't truly addressed this. So, can you tell us when you can actually do away with the ability of the Planning Inspectorate to allow developments that don't have a proper proportion of affordable housing? When will you deal with that? Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch, Weinidog, am y datganiad, a dwi yn cydnabod y gwaith helaeth rydych chi a'ch tîm wedi ei wneud ar hyn dros y misoedd diwethaf. Rwy'n credu bod y pandemig wedi gwneud i nifer o bobl sylweddoli bod angen uwchraddio'r hawl i gartref fod yn fater o hawl ddynol a bod digartrefedd yn rhywbeth sy'n niweidio pawb o fewn cymdeithas. Rwy'n croesawu eich ymrwymiad i geisio atal unrhyw un rhag dychwelyd i'r strydoedd, ond mae'ch datganiad yn cyfeirio at roi pobl mewn llety dros dro mewn rhai llefydd er mwyn cyflawni hyn, pan mae'n glir bod angen datrysiad tymor hir. Dwi'n gwybod eich bod chi eisiau cael datrysiad tymor hir i hyn, ond mae gen i rywfaint o bryder bod brys o ran symud rhai pobl oddi ar y strydoedd wedi arwain at ddefnyddio cyfleusterau amhriodol mewn rhai achosion. Er enghraifft, rwyf wedi clywed tystiolaeth anecdotaidd o bobl, yn dilyn perthynas niweidiol, yn cael eu rhoi mewn llety brys gyda phobl oedd â phroblemau o ran cam-drin cyffuriau. Yn amlwg, doedd hynny ddim yn sefyllfa dda i neb, felly byddwn yn gofyn ichi edrych eto ar yr opsiynau sydd gan gynghorau er mwyn sicrhau bod llety priodol ar gael i bawb. Dwi yn gweld bod nifer o gynghorwyr wedi bod yn gweithio'n galed iawn ar hyn dros y misoedd diwethaf. Yn ogystal, buaswn i'n hoffi gweld llwybr i sicrhau bod llety brys ond yn cael ei ddefnyddio dros dro a bod gennym atebion tymor hir ar gyfer pobl sy'n canfod eu hunain yn ddigartref. Nawr, i droi at y manylion o ran ehangu'r mesurau ' no evictions ' sydd yn y datganiad, rŷn ni'n croesawu ehangu hyn, ond mae gen i bryder o ran y cynnig i leihau'r cyfnod hysbysu ar gyfer ymddygiad sydd yn wrthgymdeithasol a cham-drin domestig. A allwch chi roi sicrwydd inni, plis, mai'r flaenoriaeth yn yr achos hwn fydd gwneud yn siŵr bod pobl sy'n cael eu troi allan yn cael llety arall a'u bod nhw'n cael help gyda'r problemau sydd ganddyn nhw? Wrth gwrs, mae hyn yn fater cymhleth, dwi'n gweld hynna, ac mae nifer o asiantaethau yn mynd i fod yn ymwneud ag ef, ond dyma'r achosion mwyaf cymhleth sydd angen y mwyaf o gymorth hefyd. Rwyf eisiau hefyd sicrwydd o ran y fenter arbed benthyciadau i denantiaid, os taw dyna'r cyfieithiad cywir. Dwi ddim yn siŵr y bydd cynyddu dyledion pobl sy'n debygol o ffeindio eu hunain mewn sefyllfa letchwith, efallai, yn ariannol, am flynyddoedd efallai, wir yn datrys y broblem. Onid yw'n annheg bod landlordiaid nawr yn cael bail-outs, mewn ffordd, gan y Llywodraeth, pan dyw llawer o sectorau ddim? Felly, hoffwn i wybod pa fesurau diogelwch sydd mewn lle i sicrhau nad ydy rhai landlordiaid yn cymryd mantais o'r fenter hon, dim ond i daflu tenantiaid mas unwaith mae'r cyfyngiadau yn cael eu codi. I gloi, hoffwn nodi mater sydd ddim yn cael ei drin yma y buaswn i wedi hoffi ei weld yn y datganiad, sef y diffyg tai cymdeithasol a diffyg tai fforddiadwy. Ydyn, mae'r niferoedd craidd yn cynyddu, ond maen nhw'n disgyn yn fyr iawn o beth sydd ei angen. Yr eliffant yn yr ystafell, os dwi'n gallu dweud hynny yn Gymraeg, yw'r ffaith bod gennym system gynllunio sydd â sicrwydd o elw wedi ei adeiladu i mewn iddi. Hynny yw, gall ddatblygwyr ddefnyddio'r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio i atal awdurdodau lleol rhag cael eu siâr haeddiannol o dai fforddiadwy mewn datblygiadau. Nid yw eich Llywodraeth wedi mynd i'r afael â hyn. Felly, a allwch chi ddweud pryd y byddwch chi'n yn gwneud i ffwrdd gyda'r gallu sydd gan yr Arolygiaeth Gynllunio i ganiatáu datblygiadau sydd heb gyfran ddigonol o dai fforddiadwy? Pryd fyddwch yn gwneud i ffwrdd gyda'r hawl iddo fe wneud hynny? Diolch.