English: Thank you for the series of questions from the Member. In terms of your first point, about holidays, I recognise that Hefin David has been making the case in particular yesterday, but in correspondence and conversation with me as well, about his residents in the Caerphilly constituency, and I'm happy to take up the Member's suggestion to write again to parts of the holiday industry. We've been in contact with them, their insurers, to again confirm the restrictions that are now in place and the fact that residents from RCT will not be able to go on holiday - it will be a breach of the law to do so - and to chase a response on this issue and indeed the outstanding response on Caerphilly. And I'm happy to take up the Member's suggestion to share that correspondence with constituency and regional Members so that you can see the letter we have written and any response we then receive. I think there's a broader point about the travel industry and reputational damage that they'll need to consider. There's a point not just about those foreign holiday operators but within the UK as well. This isn't just about having sympathy for people who have found their ability to go on holiday restricted. If people did breach the law and nevertheless go on holiday, they are at a higher risk of having coronavirus because community transmission is taking place, and I do not think that holiday operators would welcome a position where someone has broken the law to go on holiday and potentially introduced coronavirus to part of their holiday operation. There is a point of self-interest here for holiday operators to do the right thing, and that must mean making sure that refunds are available and people are not put in an invidious position and, equally, that other holidaymakers don't feel at risk from people that they're sitting next to in terms of transport. There is a point about how we support people, and there's a really difficult point here, because, in the English restrictions that have been introduced locally, we haven't seen an additional flow of resource going in to support businesses. Now, we've seen that in Leicester and other areas too, and, again, I think this would benefit from a joined-up UK response, where we can sit down and understand the budgetary response that is available, and whether there is a, potentially, UK-wide scheme for businesses where we're placing new restrictions upon them. Our budgetary position in Wales is not that we're in a position where we have lots of spare cash to be able to put into businesses to support them when we're needing to take public health measures to protect the health of the wider public. That's why myself and the First Minister have been very clear that we want to see the COBRA process restart in earnest, to have regular conversations, and, hopefully, shared decisions, but, equally, within our own individual responsibilities, a better way of communicating, in every part of Wales and the UK, the choices that are being made and what underpins them. In terms of shielding, the whole country is being advised to work from home wherever possible, and that is something that certainly applies to people who are being shielded, not just people who live in Rhondda Cynon Taf and Caerphilly. The advice from our chief medical officer - we had a deliberate discussion about the shielded population, and, whilst the advice at present isn't to reintroduce the full shielding arrangements, we are considering direct contact with people who were previously shielded to remind them of the position that they were in, the current position, and to remind them in particular that they should follow these rules to the letter to make sure they're minimising their risk of exposure, because they're at much greater risk of harm. And when it comes to staying local, we both have a local travel restriction, but it is also an opportunity for people to support their local businesses. And that's both about how we comply with the rules ourselves as customers, but also how businesses themselves make it clear that they are providing as safe an environment as possible for their customers to continue coming back, whether online or in person. And I hope that people do take seriously the message that exists here, not just from an enforcement point of view, but actually look after our staff and look after the public that they serve.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiynau gan yr Aelod. Ar eich pwynt cyntaf, yn ymwneud â gwyliau, rwy'n cydnabod bod Hefin David wedi bod yn sôn ddoe, ond mewn gohebiaeth, ac mewn trafodaeth â mi hefyd, am ei drigolion yn etholaeth Caerffili, ac rwy'n hapus i dderbyn awgrym yr Aelod ynglŷn ag ysgrifennu at rannau o'r diwydiant gwyliau eto. Rydym wedi bod mewn cysylltiad â hwy, eu hyswirwyr, i gadarnhau unwaith eto y cyfyngiadau sydd bellach ar waith a'r ffaith na fydd trigolion Rhondda Cynon Taf yn gallu mynd ar wyliau - byddai gwneud hynny'n torri'r gyfraith - ac i fynd ar drywydd ymateb ar y mater hwn ac yn wir yr ymateb rydym yn ei ddisgwyl mewn perthynas â Chaerffili. Ac rwy'n hapus i dderbyn awgrym yr Aelod i rannu'r ohebiaeth honno ag Aelodau etholaethol a rhanbarthol fel y gallwch weld y llythyr rydym wedi'i ysgrifennu ac unrhyw ymateb a gawn wedyn. Rwy'n credu bod pwynt ehangach am y diwydiant teithio a'r niwed i'w enw da y bydd angen ei ystyried. Mae pwynt yno nid yn unig am y cwmnïau gwyliau tramor ond y rhai o fewn y DU hefyd. Nid oes a wnelo hyn yn unig â chydymdeimlad â phobl y cyfyngwyd ar eu gallu i fynd ar wyliau. Pe bai pobl yn torri'r gyfraith ac yn mynd ar wyliau beth bynnag, maent mewn mwy o berygl o gael coronafeirws oherwydd bod trosglwyddo cymunedol yn digwydd, ac nid wyf yn credu y byddai cwmnïau gwyliau'n croesawu sefyllfa lle mae rhywun wedi torri'r gyfraith i fynd ar wyliau ac o bosibl wedi cyflwyno coronafeirws i ran o'u gweithgarwch gwyliau. Mae o fudd i gwmnïau gwyliau wneud y peth iawn, ac mae'n rhaid i hynny olygu sicrhau bod ad-daliadau ar gael ac nad yw pobl yn cael eu rhoi mewn sefyllfa annifyr ac yn yr un modd, nad yw pobl eraill sy'n mynd ar wyliau yn teimlo dan fygythiad gan y bobl sy'n eistedd wrth eu hymyl o ran trafnidiaeth. Mae yna bwynt ynglŷn â sut rydym yn cefnogi pobl, ac mae pwynt anodd iawn yma, oherwydd, yn y cyfyngiadau sydd wedi'u cyflwyno'n lleol yn Lloegr, nid ydym wedi gweld llif ychwanegol o adnoddau'n mynd tuag at gefnogi busnesau. Nawr, rydym wedi gweld hynny yng Nghaerlŷr ac ardaloedd eraill hefyd, ac unwaith eto, credaf y byddai hyn yn elwa o ymateb cydgysylltiedig yn y DU, lle gallwn eistedd i lawr a deall yr ymateb cyllidebol sydd ar gael, a ph'un a oes cynllun DU gyfan o bosibl ar gyfer busnesau lle rydym yn gosod cyfyngiadau newydd arnynt. Mae ein sefyllfa gyllidebol yng Nghymru yn golygu nad ydym mewn sefyllfa lle mae gennym lawer o arian dros ben i allu ei roi i fusnesau i'w cefnogi pan fydd angen inni roi camau iechyd cyhoeddus ar waith i ddiogelu iechyd y cyhoedd yn ehangach. Dyna pam rwyf fi a'r Prif Weinidog wedi bod yn glir iawn ein bod eisiau gweld proses COBRA yn ailddechrau o ddifrif, i gael sgyrsiau rheolaidd, a rhannu penderfyniadau gobeithio, ond yn yr un modd, o fewn ein cyfrifoldebau unigol ein hunain, ffordd well o gyfathrebu, ym mhob rhan o Gymru a'r DU, y dewisiadau sy'n cael eu gwneud a'r hyn sy'n sail iddynt. O ran gwarchod, cynghorir y wlad gyfan i weithio gartref lle bynnag y bo modd, ac mae hynny'n sicr yn berthnasol i bobl ar y rhestr warchod, nid pobl sy'n byw yn Rhondda Cynon Taf a Chaerffili yn unig. Y cyngor gan ein prif swyddog meddygol - cawsom drafodaeth fwriadol am y boblogaeth sy'n gwarchod, ac er nad ydym yn cael ein cynghori i ailgyflwyno'r trefniadau gwarchod llawn ar hyn o bryd, rydym yn ystyried cyswllt uniongyrchol â phobl a oedd gynt yn cael eu gwarchod i'w hatgoffa o'r sefyllfa roeddent ynddi, y sefyllfa bresennol, ac i'w hatgoffa yn arbennig y dylent ddilyn y rheolau hyn yn llym er mwyn sicrhau eu bod yn lleihau eu risg o ddod i gysylltiad â'r coronafeirws, oherwydd eu bod mewn llawer mwy o berygl o niwed. A phan ddaw'n fater o aros yn lleol, mae gennym gyfyngiadau teithio lleol, ond mae hefyd yn gyfle i bobl gefnogi eu busnesau lleol. Ac mae hynny'n ymwneud â sut rydym yn cydymffurfio â'r rheolau ein hunain fel cwsmeriaid, ond hefyd sut y mae busnesau eu hunain yn ei gwneud yn glir eu bod yn darparu amgylchedd mor ddiogel â phosibl i'w cwsmeriaid er mwyn iddynt allu parhau i ddod yn ôl, boed ar-lein neu'n gorfforol. A gobeithio y bydd pobl o ddifrif ynglŷn â'r neges hon, nid yn unig o safbwynt gorfodaeth, ond er mwyn gofalu am ein staff ac edrych ar ôl y cyhoedd y maent yn eu gwasanaethu.