techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, Llywydd, what the figures quoted by Leanne Wood demonstrate is that this is a mobile workforce in a shortage profession where people who are able to be A&E consultants themselves make decisions about where they go to work. Nobody, neither she nor I, is in a position to direct people to take up jobs. People apply and they decide. As you have seen, people do that. That's just the nature of the way that people are recruited in a shortage profession. [ Interruption.] It would help a lot, I think, if Members were willing to listen to the answer rather than shouting across it all the time. That's three Members on the Plaid Cymru benches who have tried to interrupt me in this one answer. So, there's a mobile workforce and people go to jobs that they decide to apply for. The south Wales programme to which Leanne Wood referred was a massive clinically led programme that had buy-in from health boards and clinicians right across south Wales. It was not a programme led by the Government; it was a programme led by doctors and clinicians in the health service. And the answer, in the position of the Royal Glamorgan Hospital, at the end is - when clinicians have had the advice they need, when they've answered the questions that they need to answer - that that is a decision that is best made by doctors and not a decision made by politicians.
Welsh: Wel, Llywydd, yr hyn y mae'r ffigurau a ddyfynnwyd gan Leanne Wood yn ei ddangos yw bod hwn yn weithlu symudol mewn proffesiwn lle ceir prinder lle mae pobl sy'n gallu bod yn feddygon ymgynghorol damweiniau ac achosion brys eu hunain yn gwneud penderfyniadau ynghylch ble maen nhw'n mynd i weithio. Nid oes neb, nid hi na minnau, mewn sefyllfa i gyfarwyddo pobl i gymryd swyddi. Mae pobl yn gwneud cais a nhw sy'n penderfynu. Fel yr ydych chi wedi gweld, mae pobl yn gwneud hynny. Dyna natur y ffordd y caiff pobl eu recriwtio mewn proffesiwn lle ceir prinder. [ Torri ar draws.] Byddai'n helpu'n fawr, rwy'n credu, pe byddai Aelodau yn fodlon gwrando ar yr ateb yn hytrach na gweiddi ar ei draws drwy'r amser. Dyna dri aelod ar feinciau Plaid Cymru sydd wedi ceisio torri ar fy nhraws i yn ystod yr un ateb hwn. Felly, ceir gweithlu symudol ac mae pobl yn mynd i swyddi y maen nhw'n penderfynu ymgeisio amdanyn nhw. Roedd rhaglen de Cymru, y cyfeiriodd Leanne Wood ati, yn rhaglen enfawr dan arweiniad clinigol a gefnogwyd gan fyrddau iechyd a chlinigwyr ledled de Cymru gyfan. Nid oedd yn rhaglen dan arweiniad y Llywodraeth; roedd yn rhaglen a arweiniwyd gan feddygon a chlinigwyr yn y gwasanaeth iechyd. A'r ateb, yn sefyllfa Ysbyty Brenhinol Morgannwg, yn y pen draw - pan fydd clinigwyr wedi cael y cyngor sydd ei angen arnyn nhw, pan fyddan nhw wedi ateb y cwestiynau y mae angen iddyn nhw eu hateb - yw bod hwnnw yn benderfyniad y mae meddygon yn y sefyllfa orau i'w wneud, ac nad yw'n benderfyniad i'w wneud gan wleidyddion.
English: First Minister, work is now well underway on the new £4 million Mountain Ash primary healthcare centre, and this is great news for the local community, bringing a range of services together and replacing existing GP facilities that were outdated and, frankly, not fit for purpose. In what other ways is the Welsh Government supporting to help deliver improvements to primary healthcare in the Cynon Valley?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, mae'r gwaith wedi hen ddechrau erbyn hyn ar ganolfan gofal iechyd sylfaenol newydd gwerth £4 miliwn yn Aberpennar, ac mae hyn yn newyddion gwych i'r gymuned leol, gan ddod ag amrywiaeth o wasanaethau at ei gilydd a disodli'r cyfleusterau meddygon teulu presennol a oedd wedi dyddio ac, a dweud y gwir, ddim yn addas i'w diben. Ym mha ffyrdd eraill y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn cynorthwyo i helpu i sicrhau gwelliannau i ofal iechyd sylfaenol yng Nghwm Cynon?
English: I thank Vikki Howells for that, Llywydd. I was being told just a couple of days ago, by the leader of RCT council, about the excitement that the new £4 million health centre is creating in Mountain Ash, one of 19 new primary care centres that this Government is funding during this Assembly term. It will bring together current GP surgeries in a new facility that, as well as providing better facilities for existing staff, will allow that centre to attract that wider range of clinical professionals that we know are required to go on sustaining primary care all across Wales. It will be a multidisciplinary team in the new Mountain Ash primary care centre, and that will guarantee that services for people in that community will be safe, secure, and sustainable for years to come.
Welsh: Diolchaf i Vikki Howells am hynna, Llywydd. Cefais wybod ychydig ddyddiau yn ôl, gan arweinydd cyngor Rhondda Cynon Taf, am y cyffro y mae'r ganolfan iechyd newydd gwerth £4 miliwn yn ei greu yn Aberpennar, un o 19 o ganolfannau gofal sylfaenol newydd y mae'r Llywodraeth hon yn eu hariannu yn ystod tymor y Cynulliad hwn. Bydd yn dod â meddygfeydd teulu presennol at ei gilydd mewn cyfleuster newydd a fydd, yn ogystal â darparu gwell cyfleusterau i staff presennol, yn caniatáu i'r ganolfan honno ddenu'r amrywiaeth ehangach honno o weithwyr proffesiynol clinigol yr ydym ni'n gwybod sydd ei hangen i barhau i gynnal gofal sylfaenol ar draws Cymru gyfan. Bydd yn dîm amlddisgyblaethol yng nghanolfan gofal sylfaenol newydd Aberpennar, a bydd hynny'n sicrhau y bydd gwasanaethau i bobl yn y gymuned honno yn ddiogel ac yn gynaliadwy am flynyddoedd i ddod.
English: Questions from the party leaders. Plaid Cymru leader, Adam Price.
Welsh: Cwestiynau gan arweinwyr y pleidiau nawr. Arweinydd Plaid Cymru, Adam Price.
English: Sorry, I didn't hear, either. And if the leader of the Brexit Party could be silent, then maybe we could have heard the question.
Welsh: Mae'n ddrwg gennyf i, ni wnes innau glywed, ychwaith. A phe gallai arweinydd plaid Brexit fod yn ddistaw, yna efallai y gallem ni fod wedi clywed y cwestiwn.
English: Your predecessor had to face a similar predicament, of course, when Leighton Andrews campaigned against a school closure in his constituency. He did then resign. The similarities between the two cases are much more striking than any differences, though the protest there was outside the Senedd, not in the constituency. The Labour source quoted by the BBC today says that this is a clear breach of the ministerial code. Now, I completely understand why Labour backbench Members want to campaign against health closures under your Government, but surely the position of Ministers is different. Accountability for the health service must lie with Ministers collectively in the Welsh Government, otherwise what is the point of the Welsh Government? And in seeking to have it both ways, in enforcing a self-denying ordinance when it comes to ministerial intervention in the case of A&E at the Royal Glamorgan, but giving carte blanche to Ministers when it is politically convenient to intervene in relation to constituency matters, you're eroding trust in politics and in this institution. So, I ask you again, First Minister: will you remove the chief whip from Government, or are you saying that what she has said on the ward closure now reflects Government policy?
Welsh: Bu'n rhaid i'ch rhagflaenydd wynebu sefyllfa debyg, wrth gwrs, pan ymgyrchodd Leighton Andrews yn erbyn cau ysgol yn ei etholaeth ef. Fe wnaeth ef ymddiswyddo wedyn. Mae'r tebygrwydd rhwng y ddau achos yn llawer mwy trawiadol nag unrhyw wahaniaethau, er bod y brotest honno y tu allan i'r Senedd, nid yn yr etholaeth. Mae'r ffynhonnell Lafur a ddyfynnwyd gan y BBC heddiw yn dweud bod hwn yn achos amlwg o dorri cod y gweinidogion. Nawr, rwy'n deall yn llwyr pam mae Aelodau meinciau cefn Llafur yn dymuno ymgyrchu yn erbyn cau cyfleusterau iechyd o dan eich Llywodraeth chi, ond does bosib nad yw sefyllfa Gweinidogion yn wahanol. Mae'n rhaid i atebolrwydd am y gwasanaeth iechyd fod gyda Gweinidogion yn gyfunol yn Llywodraeth Cymru, neu beth yw diben Llywodraeth Cymru fel arall? A thrwy geisio ei chael hi bob ffordd, trwy orfodi gorchymyn hunanwadu pan ddaw'n fater o ymyrraeth weinidogol yn achos adran damweiniau ac achosion brys Ysbyty Brenhinol Morgannwg, ond rhoi rhwydd hynt i Weinidogion pan fo'n wleidyddol gyfleus i ymyrryd o ran materion etholaeth, rydych chi'n erydu ymddiriedaeth mewn gwleidyddiaeth ac yn y sefydliad hwn. Felly, gofynnaf i chi eto, Prif Weinidog: a wnewch chi ddiswyddo'r prif chwip o'r Llywodraeth, neu a ydych chi'n dweud bod yr hyn y mae hi wedi ei ddweud am gau'r ward yn adlewyrchu polisi'r Llywodraeth erbyn hyn?
English: Well, Llywydd, I've seldom heard more nonsense spoken in this Assembly. Now, I took the trouble to bring the ministerial code with me. I don't suppose the Member took the trouble to read it; he's not a man for detail, as we know. But let me acquaint him with the detail of the ministerial code. Here it is - he groans at the thought of being informed so that he can ask a better question next time because his question this afternoon is just - . The minute you look at the ministerial code, you will see that his question has absolutely no substance at all. Here is paragraph 4.7 in the ministerial code: 'Ministers are free to make their views about constituency matters known'. They can do it by writing to the responsible Minister, by leading deputations or by personal interview. What the Member for the Vale of Glamorgan did is entirely consistent with the ministerial code. I know because I took the trouble to check it before this afternoon. And let me tell you this: you aren't a Government Minister for 20 years in devolution without understanding what you can and cannot do in your constituency and ministerial capacities, and the Member for the Vale of Glamorgan has a better understanding in her little finger of the probity and decency required of Ministers than his question this afternoon demonstrates for a moment.
Welsh: Wel, Llywydd, nid wyf i'n aml wedi clywed mwy o lol yn cael ei siarad yn y Cynulliad hwn. Nawr, fe es i'r drafferth o ddod â chod y gweinidogion gyda mi. Nid wyf i'n tybio bod yr Aelod wedi mynd i'r drafferth i'w ddarllen; nid yw'n hoff o fanylion, fel y gwyddom. Ond gadewch i mi ei ymgyfarwyddo â manylion cod y gweinidogion. Dyma ni - mae'n gruddfan at y syniad o gael ei hysbysu fel y gall ofyn cwestiwn gwell y tro nesaf oherwydd mai ei gwestiwn y prynhawn yma yn - . Y funud yr edrychwch chi ar god y gweinidogion, byddwch yn gweld nad oes dim sylwedd i'w gwestiwn o gwbl. Dyma baragraff 4.7 yng nghod y gweinidogion: 'Mae rhwydd hynt i'r Gweinidogion fynegi barn am faterion etholaethol'. Cânt wneud hynny drwy ysgrifennu at y Gweinidog cyfrifol, drwy arwain dirprwyaethau neu drwy gyfweliad personol. Mae'r hyn a wnaeth yr Aelod dros Fro Morgannwg yn gwbl gyson â chod y gweinidogion. Rwy'n gwybod hynny gan fy mod i wedi mynd i'r drafferth i'w wirio cyn y prynhawn yma. A gadewch i mi ddweud hyn wrthych chi: nid ydych chi'n Weinidog yn y Llywodraeth am 20 mlynedd o ddatganoli heb ddeall yr hyn y cewch ac na chewch ei wneud yn eich swyddogaethau etholaethol a gweinidogol, ac mae gan yr Aelod dros Fro Morgannwg well dealltwriaeth yn ei bys bach o'r gonestrwydd a'r gwedduster sy'n ofynnol gan Weinidogion nag y mae ei gwestiwn ef y prynhawn yma yn ei ddangos am ennyd.
English: Yes, I did take the opportunity to read the ministerial code, and it's quite clear in the ministerial code that Ministers cannot campaign against Government policy. This ward closure was a direct result of your own Government policy. That's the point. You're in danger, on the NHS, of turning double standards into an art form, of having your cake as a Government and eating it as an opposition. It's your policy that led to this proposed closure. The chief whip is campaigning against your own Government policy. In other Parliaments, in other contexts, as chief whip, she'd have to have a stern word with herself; maybe remove the whip from herself. You couldn't make it up, First Minister, except that you do, time after time, when it's politically expedient to do so. Whatever happened to collective responsibility?
Welsh: Do, fe wnes i fanteisio ar y cyfle i ddarllen cod y gweinidogion, ac mae'n eithaf eglur yng nghod y gweinidogion na chaiff Gweinidogion ymgyrchu yn erbyn polisi'r Llywodraeth. Roedd cau'r ward hon yn ganlyniad uniongyrchol i bolisi eich Llywodraeth chi. Dyna'r pwynt. Rydych chi mewn perygl, o ran y GIG, o droi safonau dwbl yn gelfyddyd, o'i chael hi un ffordd fel Llywodraeth a'r ffordd arall fel gwrthblaid. Eich polisi chi arweiniodd at y cau arfaethedig hwn. Mae'r prif chwip yn ymgyrchu yn erbyn polisi eich Llywodraeth eich hun. Mewn Seneddau eraill, mewn cyd-destunau eraill, fel prif chwip, byddai'n rhaid iddi gael gair llym gyda'i hun; cymryd y chwip oddi wrthi ei hun efallai. Ni allech chi wneud y peth i fyny, Prif Weinidog, heblaw eich bod chi yn gwneud hynny, dro ar ôl tro, pan fydd hi'n wleidyddol gyfleus i wneud hynny. Beth yn y byd ddigwyddodd i gydgyfrifoldeb?
English: Well, the truth, Llywydd, is that I'm not making it up, but he certainly is. There is no conflict at all. The ministerial code - . Llywydd, let me just explain to the Member just one more time. What is at the heart of the ministerial code is this: nobody's constituents should be advantaged because their elected Member is a Minister; nobody's constituents should be disadvantaged because their elected Member is a Minister, and Ministers are completely free, in the terms of the code, to act as the Member for the Vale of Glamorgan did on this occasion. Five different times during the period of this institution, constituents in that part of Wales have had an opportunity to choose their representative, and they've chosen the same person every time. I think they will go on doing that, because they know that she understands how she can best represent their interests and be a Minister, and a very effective Minister in the Welsh Government, and nothing at all that has been said this afternoon casts any doubt at all on her actions.
Welsh: Wel, y gwir, Llywydd, yw nad wyf i'n ei wneud i fyny, ond mae e'n sicr yn gwneud hynny. Nid oes unrhyw wrthdaro o gwbl. Mae cod y gweinidogion - . Llywydd, gadewch i mi esbonio i'r Aelod dim ond un waith eto. Yr hyn sydd wrth wraidd cod y gweinidogion yw hyn: ni ddylai etholwyr unrhyw un fod o dan anfantais oherwydd bod eu Haelod etholedig yn Weinidog; ni ddylai etholwyr unrhyw un fod o dan anfantais oherwydd bod eu Haelod etholedig yn Weinidog, ac mae Gweinidogion yn gwbl rydd, o ran y cod, i ymddwyn fel y gwnaeth yr Aelod dros Fro Morgannwg y tro hwn. Bum gwaith ar wahân yn ystod cyfnod y sefydliad hwn, mae etholwyr yn y rhan honno o Gymru wedi cael cyfle i ddewis eu cynrychiolydd, ac maen nhw wedi dewis yr un person bob tro. Rwy'n credu y byddan nhw'n parhau i wneud hynny, gan eu bod nhw'n gwybod ei bod hi'n deall y ffordd orau iddi gynrychioli eu buddiannau a bod yn Weinidog, ac yn Weinidog effeithiol iawn yn Llywodraeth Cymru, ac nid oes dim byd o gwbl a ddywedwyd y prynhawn yma yn bwrw unrhyw amheuaeth o gwbl ar ei gweithredoedd.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. First Minister, what specific actions is your Government now taking to support the more than 12,000 survivors of domestic abuse in Wales?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, pa gamau penodol y mae eich Llywodraeth yn eu cymryd nawr i gynorthwyo'r mwy na 12,000 o oroeswyr cam-drin domestig yng Nghymru?
English: I thank the Member for that important question. The Welsh Government has taken a series of actions, following the passage of the Violence against Women, Domestic Abuse and Sexual Violence (Wales) Act 2015 put on the statute book here. We have trained record numbers of staff in public services to make sure that they are able to ask and act, as we say, to make sure that people recognise the potential of domestic violence, to ask people whether that has been part of their experience and then to act on it. We have provided funding, both for the training of public sector workers, but also for services of people who find themselves victims of domestic violence. As the Member will know, the fourth phase of a very successful awareness campaign on coercive control was launched at the start of this year, and we look forward to that campaign having even further success beyond the success it demonstrated in 2019.
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn pwysig yna. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi cymryd cyfres o gamau, yn dilyn hynt Deddf Trais yn erbyn Menywod, Cam-drin Domestig a Thrais Rhywiol (Cymru) 2015 a roddwyd ar y llyfr statud yn y fan yma. Rydym ni wedi hyfforddi'r nifer fwyaf erioed o staff mewn gwasanaethau cyhoeddus i wneud yn siŵr eu bod nhw'n gallu gofyn a gweithredu, fel y dywedwn, i wneud yn siŵr bod pobl yn cydnabod potensial trais yn y cartref, i ofyn i bobl a yw hynny wedi bod yn rhan o'u profiad ac yna i weithredu arno. Rydym ni wedi darparu cyllid, ar gyfer hyfforddi gweithwyr sector cyhoeddus, ond hefyd ar gyfer gwasanaethau pobl sy'n eu canfod eu hunain yn ddioddefwyr trais domestig. Fel y bydd yr Aelod yn gwybod, lansiwyd pedwerydd cam ymgyrch ymwybyddiaeth lwyddiannus iawn ar reolaeth gymhellol ddechrau'r flwyddyn eleni, ac edrychwn ymlaen at weld yr ymgyrch honno yn llwyddo ymhellach y tu hwnt i'r llwyddiant a ddangosodd yn 2019.
English: Of course, First Minister, it's been four years since the Violence against Women, Domestic Abuse and Sexual Violence (Wales) Act 2015 came into force. I asked you earlier about what specific actions your Government is now taking to support survivors, because, at the end of last year, the Auditor General for Wales's report into domestic abuse made several recommendations on improving services for people going through domestic abuse. Now, crucial in providing the right support is mapping an accurate picture of service provision and ensuring a joint pathway of support, so that survivors don't have to navigate a complex and fragmented system. The auditor general reported that there was a postcode lottery of provision, with some survivors stating that they were overwhelmed by the number of agencies, while some fell through the gaps, and some have reported inconsistencies in information from different agencies. Of major concern was the 431 survivors who were not able to access a refuge. Now, shortly after the report was published, your Government stated that it welcomed the report and its recommendations, but you needed time to reflect on those recommendations. Can you therefore tell us when you will be responding to this report, given that you've had nearly three months to respond to it? Can you also give us an indication of what you'll do differently as a Government in light of this particular report?
Welsh: Wrth gwrs, Prif Weinidog, mae pedair blynedd wedi mynd heibio ers i Ddeddf Trais yn erbyn Menywod, Cam-drin Domestig a Thrais Rhywiol (Cymru) 2015 ddod i rym. Gofynnais i chi yn gynharach am ba gamau penodol y mae eich Llywodraeth yn eu cymryd nawr i gefnogi goroeswyr, oherwydd, ddiwedd y llynedd, gwnaeth adroddiad Archwilydd Cyffredinol Cymru ar gam-drin domestig sawl argymhelliad ar wella gwasanaethau i bobl sy'n dioddef cam-drin domestig. Nawr, yn hollbwysig wrth ddarparu'r cymorth cywir mae mapio darlun cywir o'r ddarpariaeth o wasanaethau a sicrhau llwybr cymorth ar y cyd, fel nad oes yn rhaid i oroeswyr lywio system gymhleth a thameidiog. Dywedodd yr Archwilydd Cyffredinol bod loteri cod post o ran darpariaeth, gyda rhai goroeswyr yn dweud eu bod yn cael eu llethu gan nifer yr asiantaethau, tra bod rhai'n syrthio drwy'r bylchau, ac mae rhai wedi hysbysu am anghysondebau mewn gwybodaeth gan wahanol asiantaethau. O bryder mawr oedd y 431 o oroeswyr nad oedden nhw'n gallu cael gafael ar loches. Nawr, yn fuan ar ôl cyhoeddi'r adroddiad, dywedodd eich Llywodraeth chi ei bod yn croesawu'r adroddiad a'i argymhellion, ond bod angen amser arnoch chi i fyfyrio ar yr argymhellion hynny. A allwch chi ddweud wrthym ni, felly, pryd y byddwch chi'n ymateb i'r adroddiad hwn, o gofio eich bod chi wedi cael bron i dri mis i ymateb iddo? Ac a allwch chi roi syniad i ni hefyd o'r hyn y byddwch chi'n ei wneud yn wahanol fel Llywodraeth yng ngoleuni'r adroddiad arbennig hwn?
English: I appreciate that response, First Minister, but I am concerned about the continuing delays associated with the 2015 Act, because your Government has now taken more than four years to actually lay national indicators following that specific Act. And we on this side of the Chamber want to work with you to ensure that the national indicators and the objectives of the national advisers on domestic abuse are absolutely appropriate. However, I am concerned that the objectives don't appear to focus on a major area of helping to increase victim confidence and access to justice, especially as four out of five women do not report abuse to the police. Overall, the auditor general found that only 60 per cent of organisations believe that they have put in place appropriate performance measures for the Act, with fewer than 65 per cent using victims' and survivors' dissatisfaction to improve services. First Minister, can you therefore reassure us today, and indeed the people of Wales, that your Government will improve the speed of your actions around this horrific aspect of life for many people in Wales?
Welsh: Rwy'n gwerthfawrogi'r ateb yna, Prif Weinidog, ond rwy'n bryderus ynghylch yr oediadau parhaus sy'n gysylltiedig â Deddf 2015, oherwydd mae eich Llywodraeth wedi cymryd dros bedair blynedd erbyn hyn i osod dangosyddion cenedlaethol yn dilyn y Ddeddf benodol honno. Ac rydym ni ar yr ochr hon i'r Siambr eisiau gweithio gyda chi i sicrhau bod y dangosyddion cenedlaethol ac amcanion y cynghorwyr cenedlaethol ar gam-drin domestig yn gwbl briodol. Fodd bynnag, rwy'n pryderu nad yw'n ymddangos bod yr amcanion yn canolbwyntio ar y maes pwysig o helpu i gynyddu hyder dioddefwyr a mynediad at gyfiawnder, yn enwedig gan nad yw pedair menyw o bob pump yn hysbysu'r heddlu eu bod yn cael eu cam-drin. Yn gyffredinol, canfu'r archwilydd cyffredinol mai dim ond 60 y cant o sefydliadau sy'n credu eu bod nhw wedi rhoi mesurau perfformiad priodol ar waith ar gyfer y Ddeddf, a llai na 65 y cant sy'n defnyddio anfodlonrwydd dioddefwyr a goroeswyr i wella gwasanaethau. Prif Weinidog, a allwch chi, felly, roi sicrwydd i ni, a phobl Cymru yn wir, heddiw, y bydd eich Llywodraeth yn gwella cyflymder eich gweithredoedd yng nghyswllt yr agwedd erchyll hon ar fywyd i lawer o bobl yng Nghymru?
English: I thank the Member for his indication of cross-party support here for the actions that lie behind the Act, and everything the public services are trying to do. It's 18 months since the fieldwork that lay behind the WAO report was carried out, and I think that a series of things have been put in place since then. The annual report of the national advisers referred to real momentum over that period. None of the recommendations in the WAO report were for the Welsh Government; they were all actions for service providers to take. But I want to give him an assurance, and people in Wales who take an interest in this, that we continue, as a Government, to invest in this area extra revenue, extra capital in the draft budget in front of the National Assembly, and to respond to it with the urgency that this agenda really deserves.
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Aelod am ei arwydd o gefnogaeth drawsbleidiol yn y fan yma i'r camau sy'n sail i'r Ddeddf, a phopeth y mae'r gwasanaethau cyhoeddus yn ceisio ei wneud. Bu 18 mis ers cyflawni'r gwaith maes a oedd yn sail i adroddiad Swyddfa Archwilio Cymru, ac rwy'n credu bod cyfres o bethau wedi eu rhoi ar waith ers hynny. Cyfeiriodd adroddiad blynyddol y cynghorwyr cenedlaethol at fomentwm gwirioneddol dros y cyfnod hwnnw. Nid oedd yr un o'r argymhellion yn adroddiad Swyddfa Archwilio Cymru ar gyfer Llywodraeth Cymru; roedden nhw i gyd yn gamau i ddarparwyr gwasanaethau eu cymryd. Ond hoffwn i roi sicrwydd iddo, ac i bobl yng Nghymru sydd â diddordeb yn hyn, ein bod ni'n parhau, fel Llywodraeth, i fuddsoddi yn y maes hwn refeniw ychwanegol, cyfalaf ychwanegol yn y gyllideb ddrafft gerbron y Cynulliad Cenedlaethol, ac ymateb iddo gyda'r brys y mae'r agenda hon wir yn ei haeddu.