English: I welcome the fact that Suzy Davies has commented on the advice that was given by the future generations commissioner - advice and guidance in terms of her powers, and the opportunities particularly to engage with those affected by those decisions about those particular school closures. I think we have to recognise that whatever the situation is, this legislation was never set up to bypass existing regulations in terms of change - difficult decisions such as school reorganisation. The school organisation code, which obviously the people and the communities you were involved with would have to have responded to, as indeed in the case that's set out as a result of this question, sets a very high standard of consultation, and it is a public consultation. The Act was never designed to bypass consultation processes such as those laid down in that particular code, which are difficult decisions. So, this Act was never set up in order to bypass or even set the stage for those kinds of legal challenges. Now, what is clear is that we have to see how the impact of the legislation, what the outcomes of that are in terms of - . I think Llyr Gruffydd made an important point - does this make a difference to our sustainable development principle in terms of social, environmental and cultural well-being making a difference? Will it make a difference to the long-term decision making of not just this Welsh Government, but all those public bodies who are willingly engaging in the new ways of working, looking at the seven well-being goals, and seeing that this actually provides them with a backdrop for a new way of working to look towards our future generations, as well as the well-being of Wales today?
Welsh: Croesawaf y ffaith fod Suzy Davies wedi gwneud sylwadau ar y cyngor a roddwyd gan gomisiynydd cenedlaethau'r dyfodol - cyngor ac arweiniad ar ei phwerau, a'r cyfleoedd yn enwedig i ymwneud â'r rhai yr effeithiwyd arnynt gan y penderfyniadau ynglŷn â chau ysgolion penodol. Credaf fod yn rhaid inni gydnabod, beth bynnag fo'r sefyllfa, na sefydlwyd y ddeddfwriaeth hon erioed i osgoi rheoliadau presennol o ran newid - penderfyniadau anodd megis ad-drefnu ysgolion. Mae'r cod trefniadaeth ysgolion, y byddai'n rhaid i'r bobl a'r cymunedau yr oeddech yn ymwneud â hwy fod wedi ymateb iddo, yn amlwg, fel sy'n wir yn yr achos a nodir o ganlyniad i'r cwestiwn hwn, yn gosod safon uchel iawn gogyfer ag ymgynghori, ac mae'n ymgynghoriad cyhoeddus. Ni chynlluniwyd y Ddeddf er mwyn osgoi prosesau ymgynghori fel y rhai a nodwyd yn y cod hwnnw, sy'n benderfyniadau anodd. Felly, ni chafodd y Ddeddf hon ei sefydlu er mwyn osgoi na hyd yn oed osod y llwyfan ar gyfer y mathau hynny o heriau cyfreithiol. Nawr, yr hyn sy'n glir yw bod yn rhaid inni weld sut y mae effaith y ddeddfwriaeth, beth yw canlyniadau hynny o ran - . Credaf fod Llyr Gruffydd wedi gwneud pwynt pwysig - a yw hyn yn gwneud gwahaniaeth i'n hegwyddor datblygu cynaliadwy o ran lles cymdeithasol, amgylcheddol a diwylliannol sy'n gwneud gwahaniaeth? A fydd yn gwneud gwahaniaeth i benderfyniadau hirdymor a wneir nid yn unig gan Lywodraeth Cymru, ond gan yr holl gyrff cyhoeddus sy'n barod i gymryd rhan yn y dulliau newydd o weithio, gan edrych ar y saith nod llesiant, a gweld bod hyn mewn gwirionedd yn rhoi cefndir iddynt ar gyfer ffordd newydd o weithio i edrych tuag at genedlaethau'r dyfodol, yn ogystal â lles Cymru heddiw?