English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. I'd like to start by thanking all Members who have contributed for their considered and constructive contributions. This isn't an area where the Government has a hard-and-fast view on what work and must work. As I indicated, we're looking at developing an evidence base based on examples of what already takes place in Wales, and the evidence of what works best. I think we're really talking about appropriate prescribing. Sometimes, it may be that social prescribing is something to replace poor prescribing decisions by clinicians and, of course, we should always constructively review what clinicians do, but there are, of course, entirely appropriate reasons why people's health will be treated by a form of medication prescription. This is about how we add to and potentially replace some of that in a way that is appropriate for the individual. If you like, picking up on what Eluned Morgan said, 'What matters to you, not what is the matter with you', and see how we empower people to take more ownership of their own choices, and then to give them those choice and how easy those choices often are, if only they're pointed in the right direction and helped in that way. There was much in Eluned Morgan and Angela Burns's contribution, even without the intervention that Angela made, where there was actually a lot of commonality: book prescriptions, art, music and sport, and the role that they have. There are a number of things we're already doing with young people, both myself and the Cabinet Secretary for Education, where we have a number of things we're doing in schools to help to try and support people and their resilience in the most general terms, and understanding what we can do to promote that general well-being for the child and their whole family, and to think about how that works. But I would not pretend that we have perfect answers. As you know in Government, there is rarely a day when there is a perfect answer, and if there is one I have yet to come across it myself. But we are thinking seriously about what we're doing and, as I said, the pilot that we're going to develop to start this year will be about building their own space. To go back to Eluned's point about where the budget is, that very much depends on what the evidence tells us about both the cost of providing the service, but then of the impact of that service, and our broader challenge, if we're speaking honestly and in a mature way, about how we shift the way in which we provide services with citizens, not to citizens, and actually how we make those choices different ones as well. So, the challenge is about how we gear this up to make that system-wide shift and change. Just going back to Angela Burns's contribution, I'm happy to recognise your point about how you refer people into a service, and what that service is, because there will, of course, be occasions when that service comes from a medical professional. There may also be times when what we call social prescribing doesn't necessarily get routed through a GP or a healthcare professional. But if it is about how you provide someone with a route to actually access support, resilience and advice to improve their general health and well-being - that's why I don't want to get too tied up on a definition, but I do recognise the King's Fund definition is a useful place to start from - . Again, thinking about Dai Lloyd's challenge about walking - those of us who have iPhones - other smartphones are available, of course - if we walk around with them, they have this handy thing on them that tells you how many steps they think you're doing, how many flights of stairs you've had. I don't always think it's entirely reliable and I tell myself there are occasions where I've done more walking when my phone's been sat on a desk - but this job is difficult and politicians are often very poor examples of doing what we say others should do. At election time, we almost all get our 10,000 steps in, but in a normal day otherwise, it's actually really quite difficult - but it's something for us about how we take time to do things for ourselves as well. Then we had Jenny's contribution and, in particular, I'm pleased to hear you mention the frequent attenders work that's often there about not saying that frequent attenders don't have health and well-being needs, but their needs are being met or dealt with inappropriately in going to the wrong place for the wrong care at the wrong time. That point is about how you provide people with a route to understand what their needs are and how they're then met appropriately. Often, that is about directing them to other services or towards what they can do for themselves. I'm particularly pleased that you highlighted the cross-Government challenge that we have. Good health and well-being is not just an issue for the health service, it is absolutely an issue that goes into education, that goes into housing, it goes into the economy - virtually every area covered in ministerial portfolios. Also, thinking back to my previous life, when I was an employment lawyer, and about the links between health, well-being and work - . Finally, in terms of some of the other points made by Mark Isherwood and Caroline, we recognise, as I said earlier, the broader benefits of this approach and in particular the importance of the third and independent sectors in helping us to get this right. So, I'm really pleased about the constructive debate that we've had. I look forward to developing our approach to social prescribing in Wales and to further raise awareness of the health and social benefits that it can bring. I ask Members to support the motion and the amendments and I look forward to reporting back to Members in due course on the work that we will undertake in the pilot and developing the approach here in Wales.
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Hoffwn ddechrau drwy ddiolch i'r holl Aelodau sydd wedi cymryd rhan am eu cyfraniadau ystyriol ac adeiladol. Nid yw hwn yn faes y mae gan y Llywodraeth farn gadarn ar yr hyn sy'n gweithio a'r hyn y mae'n rhaid iddo weithio. Fel y nodais, rydym ni'n ystyried datblygu sylfaen dystiolaeth yn seiliedig ar enghreifftiau o'r hyn sydd eisoes yn digwydd yng Nghymru, a'r dystiolaeth o'r hyn sy'n gweithio orau. Rwy'n credu mai'r hyn yr ydym ni'n sôn amdano mewn gwirionedd yw rhagnodi priodol. Weithiau, efallai bod rhagnodi cymdeithasol yn rhywbeth i ddisodli penderfyniadau rhagnodi gwael gan glinigwyr ac, wrth gwrs, dylem ni bob amser adolygu yn adeiladol yr hyn y mae clinigwyr yn ei wneud, ond, wrth gwrs, mae rhesymau cwbl briodol pam mae iechyd pobl yn cael ei drin gan ryw fath o bresgripsiwn meddyginiaeth. Mae hyn yn ymwneud â sut yr ydym ni'n ychwanegu at, ac o bosibl disodli rhywfaint o hynny, mewn ffordd sy'n briodol i'r unigolyn. Os mynnwch chi, fel y dywedodd Eluned Morgan, 'Yr hyn sy'n bwysig i chi, nid yr hyn sy'n bod arnoch chi', a gweld sut yr ydym yn grymuso pobl i gymryd cyfrifoldeb dros eu dewisiadau eu hunain i fwy o raddau, ac yna rhoi'r dewisiadau hynny iddyn nhw a pha mor hawdd yw'r dewisiadau hynny yn aml, dim ond iddynt gael eu rhoi ar y trywydd cywir a chael eu helpu yn y ffordd honno. Roedd llawer yng nghyfraniad Eluned Morgan ac Angela Burns, hyd yn oed heb yr ymyriad a wnaeth Angela, lle yr oedd llawer o elfennau cyffredin mewn gwirionedd: presgripsiynau llyfr, celfyddydau, cerddoriaeth a chwaraeon, a'r swyddogaeth sydd ganddynt. Mae nifer o bethau yr ydym ni eisoes yn ei wneud gyda phobl ifanc, fi fy hun ac Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Addysg, lle mae gennym nifer o bethau yr ydym yn eu gwneud mewn ysgolion i helpu i geisio cefnogi pobl a'u gwytnwch yn y modd mwyaf cyffredinol, a deall yr hyn y gallwn ni ei wneud i hyrwyddo llesiant cyffredinol y plentyn a'i deulu cyfan, a meddwl am sut y mae hynny'n gweithio. Ond ni fyddwn yn esgus bod gennym atebion perffaith. Fel y gwyddoch yn y Llywodraeth, yn bur anaml y ceir ateb perffaith, ac os oes un i'w gael nid wyf wedi dod o hyd iddo fy hun eto. Ond rydym yn meddwl o ddifrif am yr hyn yr ydym yn ei wneud ac, fel y dywedais, bydd y cynllun arbrofol yr ydym yn mynd i'w ddatblygu i ddechrau eleni yn ymwneud â chreu eu hatebion eu hunain. I fynd yn ôl at bwynt Eluned ynghylch ble mae'r gyllideb, mae hynny'n dibynnu i raddau helaeth ar beth y bydd y dystiolaeth yn ei ddweud wrthym am y gost o ddarparu'r gwasanaeth, ond yna am effaith y gwasanaeth hwnnw, a'n her ehangach, os ydym ni'n siarad yn onest ac mewn ffordd aeddfed, am sut yr ydym ni'n newid y ffordd yr ydym yn darparu gwasanaethau gyda dinasyddion, nid i ddinasyddion, ac mewn gwirionedd sut yr ydym ni'n gwneud y dewisiadau hynny'n rhai gwahanol hefyd. Felly, yr her yw sut yr ydym ni'n paratoi ar gyfer cyflawni'r symudiad a'r newid hwnnw ar draws y system. I fynd yn ôl at gyfraniad Angela Burns am funud, rwy'n hapus i gydnabod eich pwynt am sut yr ydych chi'n atgyfeirio pobl i wasanaeth, a'r hyn yw'r gwasanaeth hwnnw, oherwydd bydd achlysuron, wrth gwrs, pan fydd y gwasanaeth hwnnw yn cael ei roi gan weithiwr meddygol proffesiynol. Efallai hefyd y bydd adegau pan na fydd yr hyn yr ydym ni'n ei alw'n rhagnodi cymdeithasol o reidrwydd yn cael ei gyfeirio drwy feddyg teulu neu weithiwr gofal iechyd proffesiynol. Ond os yw'n ymwneud â sut yr ydych chi'n rhoi llwybr i rywun gael cymorth, cydnerthedd a chyngor i wella eu hiechyd a'u lles cyffredinol - dyna pam nad wyf eisiau treulio gormod o amser yn sôn am ddiffiniad, ond rwy'n cydnabod bod diffiniad The King's Fund yn fan cychwyn defnyddiol - . Unwaith eto, gan feddwl am her Dai Lloyd o ran cerdded - i'r rhai ohonom sydd ag iPhones - mae mathau eraill o ffonau clyfar ar gael, wrth gwrs - os ydym ni'n cerdded o gwmpas gyda nhw, mae ganddyn nhw y peth defnyddiol yma arnyn nhw sy'n dweud wrthych chi faint o gamau y mae'n meddwl yr ydych chi wedi eu gwneud, faint o risiau yr ydych chi wedi eu dringo. Nid wyf bob amser yn credu ei fod yn gwbl ddibynadwy ac rwy'n dweud wrthyf fy hun bod yna adegau pan yr wyf wedi gwneud mwy o gerdded pan oedd fy ffôn yn eistedd ar ddesg - ond mae'r swydd hon yn anodd ac mae gwleidyddion yn aml yn enghreifftiau gwael iawn o wneud yr hyn yr ydym ni'n dweud y dylai pobl eraill eu gwneud. Ar adeg etholiad, rydym ni bron i gyd yn gwneud ein 10,000 o gamau, ond ar ddiwrnod arferol fel arall, mae'n eithaf anodd mewn gwirionedd - ond mae'n rhywbeth i ni o ran y ffordd yr ydym ni'n neilltuo amser i wneud pethau drosom ni ein hunain hefyd. Yna cawsom gyfraniad Jenny, ac, yn arbennig, rwy'n falch o'ch clywed chi'n sôn am y gwaith mynychwyr rheolaidd sy'n aml yn ymwneud â pheidio â dweud nad oes gan fynychwyr rheolaidd anghenion iechyd a llesiant, ond mae eu hanghenion yn cael eu diwallu neu eu trin yn amhriodol trwy iddynt fynd i'r lle anghywir ar gyfer y gofal anghywir ar yr amser anghywir. Mae'r pwynt hwnnw yn ymwneud â sut yr ydych chi'n rhoi llwybr i bobl i ddeall beth yw eu hanghenion a sut y maen nhw wedyn yn cael eu bodloni'n briodol. Yn aml, mae hynny'n ymwneud â'u cyfeirio at wasanaethau eraill neu tuag at yr hyn y gallant ei wneud drostynt eu hunain. Rwy'n arbennig o falch eich bod wedi amlygu'r her sydd gennym ar draws y Llywodraeth. Nid yw iechyd a llesiant da yn fater i'r gwasanaeth iechyd yn unig, mae'n sicr yn fater sy'n berthnasol i addysg, tai, yr economi - bron pob maes sy'n rhan o bortffolio gweinidogol. Hefyd, gan feddwl yn ôl i fy mywyd blaenorol, pan oeddwn yn gyfreithiwr cyflogaeth, ac am y cysylltiadau rhwng iechyd, llesiant a gwaith - . Yn olaf, o ran rhai o'r pwyntiau eraill a wnaed gan Mark Isherwood a Caroline, rydym ni'n cydnabod, fel y dywedais yn gynharach, manteision ehangach y dull hwn ac yn enwedig, pwysigrwydd y trydydd sector a'r sector annibynnol i'n helpu i wneud hyn yn iawn. Felly, rwy'n falch iawn ein bod wedi cael y ddadl adeiladol hon. Edrychaf ymlaen at ddatblygu ein dull o ragnodi cymdeithasol yng Nghymru ac i godi ymwybyddiaeth o'r manteision iechyd a chymdeithasol y gallai fod iddo. Gofynnaf i'r Aelodau gefnogi'r cynnig a'r gwelliannau ac edrychaf ymlaen at adrodd yn ôl i'r Aelodau maes o law ar y gwaith y byddwn yn ei wneud yn y cynllun arbrofol a datblygu'r dull hwn o weithredu yma yng Nghymru.