techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: And the second question from me is: if there would be an opportunity to step back and to look at the situation across Wales in terms of dentistry, do you have any ideas in terms of reviewing what could work? If you had a blank slate, a Rolls-Royce model that you could put in place, what would you do that's different? Because we're quite a small nation, we're not like England, and we do have an opportunity to look at how we can ensure that the majority of people who want and need a dentist can access one. So, do you have any ideas that you want to throw in and say, 'Well, I'd like to consider this'?
Welsh: A'r ail gwestiwn wrthyf fi ydy: os oes yna gyfle i gymryd cam yn ôl ac edrych ar y sefyllfa dros Gymru ynglŷn â deintyddiaeth a deintyddion, oes gennych chi ryw fath o syniadau am ailedrych ar beth sydd yn gweithio? Beth fyddai eich syniadau chi pe byddai yna blank slate, Rolls-Royce model - beth fuasech chi'n ei wneud sy'n wahanol? Achos dŷn ni'n wlad eithaf bychan, dŷn ni ddim fel Lloegr, i ddweud y gwir, ac mae gennym ni gyfle i edrych ar sut gallwn ni wneud yn siŵr bod y mwyafrif o bobl sydd eisiau ac sydd angen cael deintydd yn cael un. Felly, oes gennych chi ryw fath o syniadau rŷch chi eisiau rhoi yn y bwlch a dweud, 'Wel, buaswn i'n meddwl am hyn'?
English: Well, yes, I have some clear ideas now. One of the things that I'm eager to do is to see to what extent we can turn the system on its head, where you start with therapists and people are then passed on to dentists, rather than people starting with a dentist and then being passed down to the therapists. So, that's what I would like to see for the future, but, if you do that, then you have to ensure that you have the workforce in place in order to allow you to turn the system on its head. So, that's why, for me, you can't do that until the workforce has been developed, and that's why I have included within the aims and objectives of HEIW that they have to focus on that as a starting point. So, it's not going to happen overnight; it takes time to train these people, but, as a vision, that's what I would like to see.
Welsh: So, oes, mae syniadau eithaf clir gyda fi erbyn hyn. Un o'r pethau dwi'n awyddus i'w wneud yw gweld i ba raddau rŷn ni'n gallu troi'r system ar ei ben, so beth rŷch chi'n ei wneud yw rydych chi'n dechrau gyda therapyddion ac mae pobl yn cael eu pasio ymlaen at ddeintyddion, yn hytrach na bod pobl yn dechrau gyda deintyddion ac yn cael eu pasio lawr i therapyddion. So, dyna beth buaswn i'n lico ei weld o ran y dyfodol, ond, os ŷch chi'n gwneud hynny, mae'n rhaid ichi sicrhau bod y gweithlu yna er mwyn troi'r system ar ei ben. Dyna pam, i fi, allwch chi ddim gwneud hynny tan fod y gweithlu wedi ei ddatblygu, a dyna pham dwi wedi rhoi i mewn i nodau HEIW fod yn rhaid iddyn nhw ganolbwyntio ar hynny fel dechreuad. So, dyw e ddim yn mynd i ddigwydd dros nos; mae'n cymryd sbel i hyfforddi'r bobl yma, ond, fel gweledigaeth, dyna beth y buaswn i'n hoffi ei wneud.
English: Thank you. Good afternoon. Do you have your headphones on? Can you hear? I can't see.
Welsh: Diolch. Prynhawn da. A ydych chi â'ch clustffonau ymlaen? Dydw i'n methu â gweld.
English: Okay. Thank you very much. You did respond there in a way - . I wanted to ask whether the blueprint has led to an improved confidence among sentencers, in terms of alternatives to short-term custody and remand. You suggested in your response to Altaf Hussain that there has been some improvement in terms of the blueprint, but that there's a long way to go. We've obviously heard evidence that these short-term sentences are still being given. We went on a visit to Eastwood Park, for example, and there were sentences of 42 days on average, and we heard some evidence that some people's sentences were for less than a week on arrival in prison. So, there clearly needs to be more done, so I'd like to ask you to confirm that the blueprint hasn't led to that increase in confidence. What more should be done?
Welsh: Iawn. Diolch yn fawr. Gwnaethoch chi ateb fanna mewn ffordd - . Roeddwn i eisiau holi a yw'r glasbrint wedi arwain at gynnydd mewn hyder ymhlith dedfrydwyr o ran y mesurau amgen i gael eich carcharu am gyfnod byr. Roeddech chi'n awgrymu fanna yn eich ateb i Altaf Hussain fod peth gwella wedi bod yn sgil y glasbrint, ond bod yna ffordd bell i fynd. Rŷm ni, yn amlwg, wedi clywed tystiolaeth fod y dedfrydau byr yma yn dal yn cael eu rhoi. Fe aethon ni ar ymweliad ag Eastwood Park, er enghraifft, a 42 diwrnod oedd y dedfryd ar gyfartaledd fanna, a rhai ohonyn nhw - gwnaethon ni glywed tystiolaeth am ddedfrydau pobl yn llai nag wythnos yn cyrraedd y carchar. Felly, mae'n amlwg bod yna rywbeth mwy angen ei wneud, felly hoffwn i ofyn i chi gadarnhau nad yw'r glasbrint wedi sicrhau'r cynnydd yna mewn hyder, ac felly beth mwy dylid ei wneud?
English: Just a follow-up question to those that Sioned asked, if that's okay, Sioned. We've heard data that 60 per cent of women from Wales are going to prison for less than six months. I just want to hear your response, if that's okay. Do you think that's a problem, or what kind of situation, in your opinion, could be an improvement on that? That is, that women from Wales - that's who we're talking about in this committee - don't have the experience of going to prison for less than six months. Thank you very much.
Welsh: Jest cwestiwn i ddilyn ar ôl rhai Sioned, os yw hynny'n iawn, Sioned. Rydyn ni wedi clywed data bod 60 y cant o fenywod o Gymru yn mynd i garchar am lai na chwe mis. Dwi jest eisiau clywed eich ymateb, os yw hynny'n iawn. Ydych chi'n meddwl bod hynny'n broblem, neu ba fath o sefyllfa, yn eich barn chi, fyddai'n gwella hynny? Hynny yw, bod menywod o Gymru - dyna pwy rydyn ni'n canolbwyntio arnyn nhw yn y pwyllgor yma - ddim yn cael y profiad o fynd i garchar am lai na chwe mis. Diolch yn fawr iawn.
English: Thank you. You mentioned in one of your responses about the importance of consistency. So, I just wanted to ask, in terms of what you know, what actions are being taken to ensure there's a consistent approach to sentencing across Wales. We heard figures from the Prison Reform Trust that said that in the number of cases in which women have been sentenced for less than six months, there was a variation of 55 per cent in the South Wales Police area, compared with 93 per cent in Dyfed-Powys. So, those figures suggest that there is quite a variation. So, could you just shed some light on how this is being looked at to ensure that there is consistency across Wales?
Welsh: Diolch. Fe wnaethoch chi sôn yn un o'ch atebion chi am bwysigrwydd cysondeb. Felly, jest eisiau holi ydw i, o ran yr hyn rŷch chi'n gwybod, pa gamau sy'n cael eu cymryd i sicrhau dull cyson o ddedfrydu dros Gymru. Fe gawsom ni ffigurau gan y Prison Reform Trust oedd yn sôn am y ffaith, yn yr achosion o fenywod sy'n cael eu dedfrydu am lai na chwe mis, roedd yna amrywiaeth o 55 y cant yn ardal heddlu'r de, o'i gymharu â 93 y cant yn Nyfed-Powys. Felly, mae'r rheini'n awgrymu bod yna amrywiaeth fawr. Felly, allwch chi daflu unrhyw oleuni i ni ar sut mae hyn yn cael ei edrych arno i sicrhau cysondeb dros Gymru?
English: Thank you, Chair. So, one final question: I just wanted to ask your opinion on the impact of UK Government legislation on the numbers of women being sent to prison. We've had written evidence on this, mentioning factors such as increasing the sentencing powers of magistrates and also, of course, the recent Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act. The Howard League says that increasing the powers of magistrates to go from six months to a year, for example, is going to affect women disproportionately. So, I wanted to hear you opinion on those elements and their effect on the number of women being sent to prison.
Welsh: Diolch, Cadeirydd. Un cwestiwn olaf: jest eisiau gofyn eich barn chi am effaith deddfwriaeth Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Gyfunol ar niferoedd y menywod sy'n cael eu hanfon i garchar. Rŷn ni wedi cael tystiolaeth ysgrifenedig ar hyn, yn sôn am ffactorau fel cynyddu pwerau dedfrydu ynadon, a hefyd, wrth gwrs, Deddf yr Heddlu, Troseddu, Dedfrydu a'r Llysoedd ddiweddar. Mae'r Howard League yn dweud bod cynyddu pwerau ynadon i fedru mynd o chwe mis i flwyddyn, er enghraifft, yn mynd i effeithio'n anghymesur ar fenywod. Felly, hoffwn i jest wybod eich barn chi am yr elfennau hynny a'u heffaith nhw ar niferoedd y menywod sy'n cael eu hanfon i garchar.
English: Thank you very much, and thank you for answering the questions on young people who have experience of the justice system, who have problems in terms of language and communication needs. There is another figure and data that shows that 60 per cent of young people who have experience of the justice system suffer from speech, language and communication difficulties - that's very high in my opinion. So, the question is: are you confident that people like yourself do recognise or identify and understand young people who have these speech and language problems who appear in your courts? How does that happen, and in what way are you confident that people like you do understand young people with those problems?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, a diolch yn fawr iawn hefyd am ateb cwestiynau ynglŷn â phobl ifanc sy'n cael profiad o'r system droseddol sy'n dioddef problemau llafar ac iaith. Mae yna ffigwr arall, os mae hwn yn iawn: data sy'n dangos bod 60 y cant o bobl ifanc sy'n cael profiad o'r system droseddol yn dioddef o broblemau llafar ac iaith - mae hynny'n uchel iawn yn fy marn i. Felly, y cwestiwn yw: a ydych chi'n hyderus bod pobl fel eich hun yn adnabod ac yn deall pobl ifanc sydd efo problemau iaith a llafar, sy'n dod i'ch llysoedd? Sut mae hynny'n digwydd? Ym mha ffordd ydych chi'n hyderus bod pobl fel chi yn deall pobl ifanc sy'n cael y problemau hynny?
English: Thank you very much, that is very helpful. Could I ask you, is the training that you've mentioned mandatory? Does everybody have to have that training when they are in the young people's courts?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, mae hynny'n helpfawr iawn. A gaf i ofyn, ydy'r hyfforddiant dŷch chi wedi siarad am yn orfodol? Oes rhaid i bawb fynd ar yr hyfforddiant yna pan mae nhw yn y llysoedd i bobl ifanc?
English: Thank you very much. And the final question that I have is: from the other side, that is the experiences of the children and young people who do go into the court system, what kind of support do you know about that is available for young people who have court experience and who do suffer with speech and language problems? What kind of support is available for them?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. A'r cwestiwn olaf gen i yw: o'r ochr arall, hynny yw, profiadau'r plant a'r bobl ifanc sy'n mynd i mewn i'r llysoedd, pa fath o gefnogaeth dŷch chi'n gwybod am sydd ar gael i bobl ifanc sy'n cael profiad o'r llys, ac sydd yn dioddef problemau llafar ac iaith? Pa fath o gefnogaeth sydd iddyn nhw, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: Thank you. That takes us very neatly, what you said about global Wales - . I'm sure that you saw over the weekend Professor Calvin Jones, for example, saying that he felt that the actions of the Government relating to Qatar aren't really aligned with the kind of global Wales that is incorporated in the Act. So, I just wanted to have your response to that, and what you feel a global Wales means and what your vision would be for that. Also, I want to know, more broadly speaking, in terms of how you're going to ensure that the role of the commissioner and the commissioner's office is something that can be held to account by people, by the Senedd, and by this committee. We've heard several times, people in the community, the fact that it should be the people's Act, and that people feel that they've been let down in the wake of how the Act is being implemented, people saying that it is toothless, and that judicial reviews throw out cases where communities are trying to use the Act to challenge decisions within their communities. So, I'd just like to get your views on that as well. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr. Mae hwnna'n mynd â ni'n dwt iawn, yr hyn roeddech chi'n ei ddweud am Gymru fyd-eang - . Fi'n siŵr wnaethoch chi weld dros y Sul yr Athro Calvin Jones, er enghraifft, yn dweud ei fod e'n teimlo bod gweithrediadau'r Llywodraeth yn ymwneud â Qatar ddim mewn gwirionedd wedi'u halinio gyda'r math o Gymru fyd-eang sy'n cael ei hymgorffori o fewn y Ddeddf. Felly, jest eisiau cael eich ymateb chi i hynny a beth rydych chi'n teimlo y mae Cymru fyd-eang yn ei olygu a beth ydy'ch gweledigaeth chi ynglŷn â hynny. A hefyd eisiau gwybod, yn fwy eang, o ran sut rydych chi'n mynd i sicrhau bod swydd a swyddfa'r comisiynydd yn rhywbeth sydd yn gallu cael ei ddal i gyfrif gan y bobl, gan y Senedd, a gan y pwyllgor yma. Dŷn ni wedi clywed sawl tro, pobl yn y gymuned, mai Deddf y bobl ddylai fe fod, a phobl yn teimlo eu bod nhw'n cael eu gadael i lawr yn sgil sut mae'r Ddeddf yn cael ei gweithredu, pobl yn dweud bod dim dannedd i'r Ddeddf, a'r adolygiadau barnwrol yn taflu allan achosion pan fydd yna gymunedau yn ceisio defnyddio'r Ddeddf i herio penderfyniadau yn eu cymunedau. Felly, jest eisiau cael eich safbwynt chi ar hynny hefyd. Diolch.
English: Yes, I just wanted to ask you, briefly. So, when something does conflict with that, when the Welsh Government, for example, is acting on the international stage in a way that doesn't feel or, in your opinion, isn't aligned with the well-being goals in the Act, how are you going to challenge them in order to show that transparency, and to show people that this office does have teeth?
Welsh: Ie, jest eisiau gofyn yn glou. So, pan fo rhywbeth yn gwrthdaro â hynny, pan fo Llywodraeth Cymru, er enghraifft, yn gweithredu ar y llwyfan byd-eang mewn ffordd sydd ddim yn teimlo neu, yn eich tŷb chi, ddim yn cyd-fynd â nodau y Ddeddf, sut ydych chi yn mynd i'w herio nhw er mwyn dangos y tryloywder yna, er mwyn dangos i'r bobl bod gan y swydd yma ddannedd?
English: Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to you all.
Welsh: Prynhawn da, bawb. Croeso i chi i gyd.
English: Thank you, Chair. I'm going to contribute in Welsh, if you have translation equipment. If I could take a step back at the start of this, in the public discussion around this Bill, there has been a lot of talk about flexibility, a flexible framework for the Bill. Can you define what that means, please? What do you mean by a flexible framework for such a Bill?
Welsh: Diolch, Gadeirydd. Dwi'n mynd i wneud cyfraniad Cymraeg, os oes gennych chi offer sy'n cyfieithu. Os caf i fynd gam yn ôl fel man cychwyn, os gwelwch yn dda, yn y drafodaeth gyhoeddus o amgylch y Bil yma, mae yna lot o sôn wedi bod am hyblygrwydd, fframwaith hyblyg y Bil. A fedrwch chi ddiffinio beth mae hynny'n golygu, os gwelwch yn dda? Beth ydych chi'n ei olygu wrth fframwaith hyblyg i Fil o'r fath?
English: Thank you for that. I was thinking then in the context of that, in the explanatory memorandum that accompanies the legislation in order to try to understand the Bill - I'll read it in English. Point 1.9,
Welsh: Diolch am hynny. Meddwl oeddwn i, wedyn, yng nghyd-destun hynny, yn yr explanatory memorandum oedd yn dod efo'r ddeddfwriaeth er mwyn trio deall y Bill - gwnaf i ddarllen rhan yn Saesneg. Mae'n dweud yn 1.9,
English: Wouldn't you be afraid that that gives the Minister too much power, whoever that Minister is on the day, to make decisions? Does that give you too much power, rather than setting out clear regulations about what's expected from those in the agricultural sector in the Act?
Welsh: Fuasech chi ddim yn ofni bod hynny'n rhoi gormod o rym i'r Gweinidog, pwy bynnag ydy'r Gweinidog ar y dydd, i wneud penderfyniad? Ydy hynny'n rhoi gormod o rym i chi yn hytrach na gosod rheolau clir ynghylch beth sy'n disgwyliedig o amaethwyr yn y Ddeddf?
English: Okay. Thank you. Perhaps we could pursue that some other time. I'm having difficulties - . I do accept your argument about having that balance, but yet who defines that balance, who gets to define it? Perhaps that leaves people who are having to interpret the legislation outside of Government in darkness. It's rather a grey area. Who gets to define that balance? So, I would like to have a little bit more explanation about that, if you would, maybe through this process or in the future, or the Chair might wish to pursue that at some point. Okay. Sections 31 -
Welsh: Ocê. Diolch. Hwyrach y cawn ni gyfle i fynd ar ôl hwnna eto. Dwi'n cael trafferth - . Dwi'n derbyn eich dadl chi am gael y balans, ond eto pwy sy'n diffinio'r balans yna a phwy sy'n cael ei ddiffinio? Mae'n gadael hwyrach pobl sy'n gorfod dehongli'r ddeddfwriaeth y tu allan i'r Llywodraeth yn y tywyllwch. Mae yna lwydni o'i amgylch o. Pwy sy'n cael diffinio'r balans yna? Felly, buaswn i'n dymuno cael ychydig mwy o eglurhad ynghylch hynny, os gwelwch yn dda, hwyrach trwy'r broses yma neu yn y dyfodol. Hwyrach bydd y Cadeirydd yn dymuno mynd yn ôl at y pwynt yna ar ryw bwynt. Ocê. Mae adrannau 31 -
English: Yes, please.
Welsh: Os gwelwch yn dda, ie.
English: Thank you very much. Sections 31 and 33 provide a power to make regulations in relation to enforcing aspects of the Bill. Why has detail about enforcement not been included on the face of the Bill, please?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Mae adrannau 31 a 33 yn darparu pŵer i wneud rheoliadau mewn perthynas â gorfodi agweddau ar y Bil. Pam nad ydy'r manylion am orfodi wedi cael eu cynnwys ar wyneb y Bil, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: Okay. This takes me back to the previous point: do you not think that there are grey areas legally in providing too much flexibility, and not a clear definition? Does that not make things more difficult for those who have to define that legislation in court in the future?
Welsh: Ocê. Mae'n mynd â fi nôl at y pwynt blaenorol eto: dŷch chi ddim yn meddwl bod yna ardal lwyd gyfreithiol yn fanna wrth roi gormod o hyblygrwydd, a dim diffiniad clir, felly? Dydy hynny ddim yn gwneud pethau'n anos i rywun sy'n gorfod diffinio'r Ddeddf yma mewn llys barn yn y dyfodol?
English: If I could just go back to a point - . At this point, perhaps I should declare an interest. I do live on a farm, and my in-laws claim payments currently because of this farm. And I'm thinking of my father-in-law in this context, and you did mention the four tiers and that you must have that balance. Do you think that this legislation for farmers such as my father-in-law - a lay farmer, who is out there trying to make a living - is it easy for such a person to understand what you're trying to achieve and to know that that farmer, in preparing work on his land, has struck the right balance with what's going on in the mind of the current Minister, and the right balance in relation to what will go through the mind of the future Minister? Do you think that this legislation is easy for a lay farmer to understand and to act upon?
Welsh: Sori, jest os caf i fynd nôl at bwynt - . Ar y pwynt yma, mae'n well i fi, hwyrach, ddatgan diddordeb. Dwi'n byw ar fferm ac mae fy rhieni-yng-nghyfraith yn hawlio taliadau ar hyn o bryd oherwydd y fferm. Ond dwi'n meddwl am fy nhad-yng-nghyfraith yn y cyd-destun hwn, ac roeddech chi'n sôn am y pedair haen a bod yn rhaid cael y balans yna. Ydych chi'n meddwl bod y ddeddfwriaeth yma, i ffermwr fel fy nhad-yng-nghyfraith - ffermwr lleyg, allan yno yn trial gwneud bywoliaeth - yn hawdd i berson o'r fath yna ddeall yr hyn dŷch chi'n trio ei gyflawni a gwybod, wrth i'r ffermwr yna baratoi gwaith ar ei dir, ydy o wedi cael y balans cywir rhwng yr hyn sy'n mynd trwy feddwl y Gweinidog presennol a'r balans cywir rhwng yr hyn sy'n mynd trwy feddwl y Gweinidog yn y dyfodol? Ydych chi'n meddwl bod hon yn ddeddfwriaeth hawdd i ffermwr lleyg ei deall a delifro arni?
English: Thank you for that answer. Section 32 concerns marketing standards. Why is there no law about marketing standards on the face of the Bill, and why, again, are matters relating to enforcement being left to regulations? Have you formulated policy in this area yet?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb yna. Mae adran 32 yn ymwneud â safonau marchnata. Pam nad oes deddf am safonau marchnata ar wyneb y Bil, a pham eto mae materion sy'n ymwneud â gorfodi yn cael eu gadael i reoliadau? Ydych chi wedi llunio polisi yn y maes yma eto?
English: Thank you. Now, in terms of introducing the Bill and it becoming an Act, when do you envisage all provisions of the Bill being fully enforced, should it be passed by the Senedd? We note that section 53 (4) enables the Welsh Ministers to commence some provisions by statutory instrument but that the other provisions will come into force at Royal Assent, or two months following that date. So, what is the timetable, please?
Welsh: Diolch. Rŵan, o ran cyflwyno'r Bil a'i fod o'n dod yn Act ac yn weithredol, pryd ydych chi'n rhagweld bydd yr holl ddarpariaethau yn y Bil mewn grym, os ydy o'n cael ei basio gan y Senedd? Rydyn ni'n nodi bod adran 53 (4) yn galluogi Gweinidogion Cymru i gychwyn rhai darpariaethau drwy offeryn statudol ond bod y darpariaethau eraill yn dod i rym pan fydd e'n cael Cydsyniad Brenhinol, neu ddau fis ar ôl hynny. Felly, beth ydy'r amserlen, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: Do you think that that creates consistency? Is it easy for people to understand when those pieces of legislation come into force, or is it going to be quite confusing when different parts of the Act come into force at different times?
Welsh: Ydych chi'n meddwl bod hwnna'n creu cysondeb? Ydy o'n hawdd i bobl ddeall pryd fydd y darnau yna o ddeddfwriaeth yn dod i rym, neu ydy pobl yn mynd i fod yn gymysglyd bod adrannau gwahanol o'r Ddeddf yn dod i rym ar adegau gwahanol?
English: James earlier spoke about a sunset clause and, thinking of that, have you considered including a sunset provision to prevent the CAP continuation powers being used indefinitely to ensure transition to the sustainable farming scheme? A sunset provision was included in the UK Agriculture Bill to ensure future provision was made for Wales. What would be the consequence of including such a provision in this Bill?
Welsh: Roedd James ynghynt yn sôn am ryw fath o clause machlud ac, yn meddwl am hynny ychydig, ydych chi wedi ystyried cynnwys darpariaeth fachlud i atal pwerau parhad y polisi amaethyddol cyffredin rhag cael eu defnyddio am gyfnod amhenodol er mwyn sicrhau trosglwyddo i'r cynllun ffermio cynaliadwy? Fe gafodd darpariaeth fachlud ei chynnwys ym Mil Amaethyddiaeth y Deyrnas Gyfunol er mwyn sicrhau bod darpariaeth yn cael ei gwneud i Gymru yn y dyfodol. Beth fyddai canlyniad cynnwys darpariaeth o'r fath yn y Bil hwn?
English: You were mentioning consultation there, and James was specifically talking about glue traps. Could you confirm that there has been sufficient consultation regarding the use of glue traps? Could you give us a picture of the consultation process you've undertaken?
Welsh: Roeddech chi'n sôn yn fanna am ymgynghori, a James yn benodol yn sôn am drapiau glud. Allwch chi gadarnhau fod yna ddigon o ymgynghori wedi bod yn benodol ar drapiau glud? Allwch chi roi darlun inni o'r broses ymgynghori dŷch chi wedi ymgymryd â hi, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: Good afternoon and welcome to this afternoon's Plenary meeting. The first item on our agenda is questions to the First Minister, and I have received notification, under Standing Order 12.58, that the Trefnydd will answer questions on behalf of the First Minister. The first question is from Jayne Bryant.
Welsh: Prynhawn da. Croeso, bawb, i'r cyfarfod y prynhawn yma. Yr eitem gyntaf ar ein hagenda yw'r cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog, a dwi wedi cael gwybod, o dan Reol Sefydlog 12.58, y bydd y Trefnydd yn ateb cwestiynau ar ran y Prif Weinidog y prynhawn yma. Y cwestiwn cyntaf, felly, Jayne Bryant.