English: I'd like to thank the Cabinet Secretary for his statement on the transformation fund. It is very eagerly anticipated, because I have heard this transformation fund being claimed by so many people as a panacea for much within the NHS, so I'm very pleased, actually, to read about the general points that you make about the criteria. Perhaps you could actually just give us a little bit more expansion about the criteria for a project going ahead to the transformation fund. Who's going to be making the decision? Will it be just the regional boards putting forward the projects and then Andrew Goodall's team making the final decision, or will it be at a slightly lower level? I'm a little bit concerned that only two projects so far have been agreed and we're coming towards the end of 2018. I appreciate it's a new fund - I'm not unrealistic - but given that the money is only available until 2020, are you confident that you'll be able to deploy that £100 million within the next, well, just over two years, and not only deploy it, but actually have it working and have the results of an evaluation so that we know whether or not those projects are then worth rolling out throughout the rest of the NHS? Are you able to give us any indication of the projects that you have had in - the six where you have not yet said 'yes' or 'no', and whether that's actually because they're a 'no' or because you're still evaluating them - and can you confirm whether or not there is equity of application across Wales? The reason why I ask that is, of course, Betsi Cadwaladr is in special measures, Hywel Dda is undergoing a fairly rigorous transformation programme, and I am quite concerned that health boards - and there may be others, not just those two - don't miss out on this opportunity because they're so busy doing their day-to-day other jobs. So, can you assure us as to whether or not we are going to have that equity of application? A couple of very quick questions, in particular: projects that you are looking at - will you be giving an extra weighting towards the primary and community sector? I ask that because, of course, the entire drive of the parliamentary review was talking about how we need to move away from the secondary sector. When I talk to health boards, I get the impression an awful lot of the application is going towards firefighting or trying to make things happen in the secondary sector. And so, this primary and community sector, which we're putting so much faith in to transform the way we deliver the NHS services over the next decade or two decades - we need to make sure that there are projects there that are going to be rolled out. Will you be able to assure us that there will be checks and balances across all of this spend and that it doesn't simply get sucked into either existing debt or fixed overheads or additional administrative personnel, so that it actually does hit the boots on the ground? I would be interested to know if this is new money that you talk about in your statement. You talk about a very welcome, as ever, £30 million for the regional transformation boards, and an extra £60 million to support the IMTPs. Is this redeployed money or completely new money on top of the £100 million? Finally, do you have a system of time framing your pilots to ensure that those pilots have a kill switch - they're either successful or unsuccessful? How long are you going to give them? Because, if they turn out to be unsuccessful - and I appreciate that we're not going to be able to be successful in every single one - then we need to be able to recognise that writing very, very quickly and move on to the next project so that we can maximise that amount of money as much as possible, to transform the NHS in the way we need to.
Welsh: Hoffwn ddiolch i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet am ei ddatganiad am y gronfa trawsnewid. Rydym yn disgwyl yn eiddgar amdani, oherwydd rwyf wedi clywed cynifer o bobl yn dweud bod y gronfa trawsnewid hon yn mynd i fod yn ateb i bopeth ar gyfer llawer o bethau yn y GIG, felly rwy'n falch iawn, mewn gwirionedd, i ddarllen am y sylwadau cyffredinol yr ydych chi'n eu gwneud ynghylch y meini prawf. Efallai y gallech chi mewn gwirionedd roi ychydig mwy o fanylion inni am feini prawf prosiect fydd yn mynd rhagddo i'r gronfa trawsnewid. Pwy fydd yn gwneud y penderfyniad? Ai dim ond y byrddau rhanbarthol fydd yn cyflwyno prosiectau ac yna tîm Andrew Goodall yn gwneud y penderfyniad terfynol, neu a fydd hynny ar lefel ychydig yn is? Rwyf ychydig yn bryderus mai dim ond dau brosiect sydd wedi eu cytuno hyd yn hyn ac rydym ni'n tynnu at derfyn 2018. Rwy'n sylweddoli ei bod hi'n gronfa newydd - nid wyf yn afrealistig - ond o gofio bod yr arian dim ond ar gael tan 2020, a ydych chi'n ffyddiog y byddwch chi'n gallu defnyddio'r £100 miliwn hwnnw o fewn, wel, yr ychydig dros ddwy flynedd nesaf, ac nid dim ond ei ddefnyddio, ond sicrhau bod y gronfa yn gweithio mewn gwirionedd a bod â chanlyniadau gwerthusiad er mwyn inni wybod a yw hi'n werth cyflwyno'r prosiectau hynny'n raddol ledled gweddill y GIG neu beidio? A allwch chi roi unrhyw syniad inni o'r prosiectau hynny sydd wedi cael eu cyflwyno - y chwech nad ydych chi eto wedi dweud 'ie' neu 'na' wrthyn nhw, ac a yw hynny mewn gwirionedd oherwydd eu bod yn 'na' neu oherwydd eich bod yn dal i'w gwerthuso - ac a allwch chi gadarnhau a oes tegwch o ran y defnydd ledled Cymru? Y rheswm pam fy mod i'n gofyn hynny, wrth gwrs, yw bod Betsi Cadwaladr o dan fesurau arbennig, mae Hywel Dda yn dilyn rhaglen drawsnewid gweddol drwyadl, ac rwy'n pryderu tipyn nad yw byrddau iechyd - ac efallai fod yna rai eraill, nid dim ond y ddau yma - yn colli'r cyfle hwn oherwydd eu bod mor brysur yn gwneud eu gwaith bob dydd arall. Felly, a allwch chi ein sicrhau ni a fydd gennym ni'r tegwch hwnnw o ran defnyddio'r arian? Ambell gwestiwn cyflym iawn, yn arbennig: y prosiectau yr ydych chi'n eu hystyried - a fyddwch chi'n rhoi mwy o bwyslais ar y sector sylfaenol a chymunedol? Rwy'n gofyn hynny oherwydd, wrth gwrs, holl gymhelliant yr adolygiad seneddol oedd sôn am sut y mae angen inni symud oddi wrth y sector eilaidd. Wrth siarad â byrddau iechyd, rwy'n cael yr argraff y defnyddir llawer iawn o hyn i ymdopi â phroblemau neu geisio gwneud i bethau ddigwydd yn y sector eilaidd. Ac felly, y sector sylfaenol a chymunedol hwn, yr ydym ni'n rhoi cymaint o ffydd ynddo i drawsnewid y ffordd yr ydym ni'n darparu gwasanaethau GIG dros y degawd neu ddau ddegawd nesaf - mae angen inni wneud yn siŵr bod yna brosiectau yn y fan honno a fydd yn cael eu cyflwyno. A fyddwch chi'n gallu ein sicrhau ni y cedwir cydbwysedd ar yr holl wariant hwn ac na fydd yn cael ei sugno i mewn i ddyled sydd eisoes yn bodoli neu i orbenion sefydlog neu ragor o bersonél gweinyddol, fel ei fod mewn gwirionedd yn gwneud gwahaniaeth ar unwaith ar lawr gwlad? Byddai gennyf ddiddordeb gwybod a yw hwn yn arian newydd yr ydych chi'n sôn amdano yn eich datganiad. Rydych chi'n sôn am £30 miliwn, y mae croeso mawr iddo, fel erioed, ar gyfer y byrddau trawsnewid rhanbarthol, a £60 miliwn ychwanegol i gefnogi'r Cynlluniau Tymor Canolig Integredig. Ai arian wedi'i adleoli yw hwn neu arian hollol newydd yn ychwanegol at y £100 miliwn? Yn olaf, a oes gennych chi system o amserlennu eich cynlluniau treialu i sicrhau bod ffordd o derfynnu'r cynlluniau treialu hynny os oes angen - eu bod nhw un ai'n llwyddiannus neu'n aflwyddiannus? Faint o amser ydych chi'n mynd i'w roi iddynt? Oherwydd, os yw'n ymddangos eu bod yn aflwyddiannus - ac rwy'n sylweddoli nad ydym ni'n mynd i allu bod yn llwyddiannus ym mhob un - yna mae angen inni allu cydnabod hynny yn gyflym iawn, iawn a symud ymlaen at y prosiect nesaf fel ein bod yn gallu gwneud y defnydd gorau posib o'r swm hwnnw o arian, i drawsnewid y GIG yn y ffordd y mae angen inni ei wneud.