English: Cabinet Secretary, on 13 December I asked you: 'Given the growing number of mesh implant survivors, England has adopted multidisciplinary teams of specialists who support patients who have had issues with mesh and advise them on treatments. Do these multidisciplinary teams exist in Wales and, if so, where are they?' You commented, as was mentioned earlier, that 'we do have multidisciplinary teams around each surgical procedure.' Now, that is simply not the case, and I'd like you to correct the record today. Moving on, if we look at pages 6 and 7 of the report, people were informed incorrectly about the potential risks and life-changing effects in consequences. People were not warned of the potential devastating life-changing complications. There was an inadequate consent process. People's problems after operations were disregarded and put down to just simply post-operative symptoms. People were turned away and made to feel like they were making a fuss, and I read here that consultants reduced some people to tears, and that there were inappropriate referrals to other specialist areas, and so on. It's a pretty grim report, and people have been permanently disabled. So, another question that I have is: what is going to be done to compensate these people? Thirdly, an expert panel was set up in Scotland on this matter in 2013, in England in 2014. The Welsh NHS was invited to take part then. In December 2014, an oversight group was set up in Engand with no Welsh NHS input. Action was taken in the United States in 2014. So, why did the people of Wales have to wait until October 2017 for the task and finish group to be set up? Was it your negligence or was it the negligence of your predecessor? I don't understand why it's not mandatory to report on problems that have been reported to doctors after surgery has taken place. I want to move on now to your -
Welsh: Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, ar 13 Rhagfyr, gofynnais i i chi: 'O ystyried nifer cynyddol goroeswyr mewnblaniad rhwyll, mae Lloegr wedi mabwysiadu timau amlddisgyblaethol o arbenigwyr sy'n cefnogi cleifion sydd wedi cael problemau â rhwyll a rhoi cyngor iddynt ar driniaethau. A yw'r timau amlddisgyblaethol hyn yn bodoli yng Nghymru ac, os felly, ble maen nhw?' Eich sylw chi, fel y soniwyd yn gynharach, oedd bod gennym dimau amlddisgyblaethol ar gyfer pob triniaeth lawfeddygol. Nawr, nid yw hynny'n wir, a hoffwn ichi gywiro'r cofnod heddiw. Gan symud ymlaen, os edrychwn ni ar dudalennau 6 a 7 o'r adroddiad, rhoddwyd gwybodaeth anghywir i bobl ynghylch y risgiau posibl ac effeithiau sy'n newid bywydau. Ni rybuddiwyd pobl am y cymhlethdodau trychinebus posibl sy'n gallu newid bywydau. Roedd yn broses ganiatâd annigonol. Diystyrwyd problemau pobl ar ôl y llawdriniaethau a'u priodoli i symptomau ôl-driniaethol. Cafodd pobl eu troi ymaith a'u gwneud i deimlo eu bod yn gwneud ffwdan, a darllenais yma fod meddygon ymgynghorol wedi gwneud i rai pobl grio, a bod yna atgyfeiriadau amhriodol i feysydd arbenigol eraill, ac ati. Mae'n adroddiad eithaf digalon, ac mae rhai pobl bellach yn anabl yn barhaol. Felly, cwestiwn arall sydd gennyf i yw: beth fydd yn cael ei wneud i ddigolledu'r bobl hyn? Yn drydydd, cafodd panel arbenigol ei sefydlu yn yr Alban ar y mater hwn yn 2013, ac yn Lloegr yn 2014. Gwahoddwyd GIG Cymru i gymryd rhan wedyn. Ym mis Rhagfyr 2014, sefydlwyd grŵp goruchwylio yn Lloegr heb unrhyw gyfraniad gan GIG Cymru. Cymerwyd camau yn yr Unol Daleithiau yn 2014. Felly, pam y bu'n rhaid i bobl Cymru aros tan fis Hydref 2017 i'r grŵp gorchwyl a gorffen gael ei sefydlu? Ai eich esgeulustod chi neu esgeulustod eich rhagflaenydd oedd hynny? Nid wyf yn deall pam nad yw'n orfodol adrodd am y problemau y soniwyd amdanynt wrth feddygon ar ôl y llawdriniaeth. Rwyf eisiau symud ymlaen yn awr at eich -