English: Can I thank Suzy Davies for her questions as well, and say that this won't delay consideration of further support for Port Talbot and further support for skills training provision, should it be requested, in the months to come? The Member is absolutely right; £60 million was put on the table in order to support steel facilities in Wales in March of 2016, and £17 million pounds has been drawn down today, including, of course, a very significant amount of money for Port Talbot and the blast furnace in order to make sure that it's a more competitive facility than it was in the past. Dirprwy Lywydd, I think it would be perhaps helpful for Members if I were to circulate a note on conditionality for Welsh Government support. Clearly, there are some issues that cannot be disclosed for commercial confidentiality purposes. However, I would like Members to be as knowledgeable as possible on how we are tying Welsh Government or taxpayer support to very strict conditions to ensure that as many jobs are protected for as long as possible. The Member is absolutely right to raise the question of the potential impact on the ecosystem within Wales. Now, the Commission will make a decision on the proposed venture by 5 June, and at the point of a decision being made, we'll be able to ascertain what - if, indeed, any - impact there will be on the ecosystem. Of course, it's worth noting that Trostre is profitable and it is competitive, because it has been sourcing steel from Port Talbot. Given that it would have to be sold as a viable concern and as a competitive business, I would surely expect that it would go on sourcing steel from the facility that has helped to make it a profitable concern.
Welsh: A gaf fi ddiolch i Suzy Davies am ei chwestiynau yn ogystal, a dweud na fydd hyn yn oedi'r broses o ystyried cymorth pellach ar gyfer Port Talbot a chymorth pellach ar gyfer darparu hyfforddiant sgiliau pe bai galw amdano yn y misoedd i ddod? Mae'r Aelod yn llygad ei lle; rhoddwyd £60 miliwn ar y bwrdd er mwyn cefnogi gweithfeydd dur yng Nghymru ym mis Mawrth 2016, a darparwyd £17 miliwn o bunnoedd heddiw, gan gynnwys, wrth gwrs, swm sylweddol iawn o arian ar gyfer Port Talbot a'r ffwrnais chwyth er mwyn gwneud yn siŵr ei fod yn waith mwy cystadleuol nag yn y gorffennol. Ddirprwy Lywydd, credaf y gallai fod o gymorth i'r Aelodau pe bawn yn dosbarthu nodyn ar yr amodau ar gyfer cymorth gan Lywodraeth Cymru. Yn amlwg, mae yna rai materion na ellir eu datgelu am resymau'n ymwneud â chyfrinachedd masnachol. Fodd bynnag, hoffwn i'r Aelodau fod mor wybodus â phosibl ynglŷn â sut y gosodwn amodau llym iawn ar gyfer cymorth Llywodraeth Cymru neu'r trethdalwr er mwyn sicrhau bod cymaint o swyddi yn cael eu diogelu am gymaint o amser â phosibl. Mae'r Aelod yn hollol iawn i ofyn cwestiwn am yr effaith bosibl ar yr ecosystem o fewn Cymru. Nawr, bydd y Comisiwn yn gwneud penderfyniad ar y fenter arfaethedig erbyn 5 Mehefin, ac wrth wneud penderfyniad, byddwn yn gallu gweld beth fydd yr effaith - os o gwbl - ar yr ecosystem. Wrth gwrs, mae'n werth nodi bod Trostre'n broffidiol ac yn gystadleuol, oherwydd mae wedi bod yn cael dur o Bort Talbot. O gofio y byddai'n rhaid ei werthu fel busnes hyfyw ac fel busnes cystadleuol, buaswn yn disgwyl y byddai'n parhau i gael dur o'r gwaith sydd wedi helpu i'w wneud yn gwmni proffidiol.