English: Diolch, Llywydd. I'm sure I'll carry the First Minister with me in saying that the last 10 minutes have proved, if nothing else, that the time for sterile political point-scoring is long past in this general election campaign to have any positive effect either way, and therefore we should concentrate more on building a successful economic future for Wales collectively, supporting other parties where that's necessary. And, to that extent, I'd like to refer back to the question that Adam Price asked immediately before party leaders' questions, and I take what the First Minister said in response to his supplementary about how the Government must conduct proper due diligence of the current proposal, but the auditor general's report on the initial funding of this project contains a catalogue of opportunities for due diligence to be conducted over the last five years, starting with the calling in of the planning application in 2012, which was approved by Carl Sargeant on account of its socioeconomic benefits. In 2014, we had the initial funding of £16 million for the development of the project, then we had a public inquiry on the deregistration of the common land. Then, in April 2016, Edwina Hart rejected the first guarantee application. In July 2016, Ken Skates rejected the second guarantee proposal, which then led to intensive discussions with officials on a variety of important issues, and then, this year, in January, we had the fully funded term sheets provided by the company and we were told due diligence was to last three to four weeks. That was then extended to six weeks and then it's been extended further, and the First Minister today has given us, I hope, an end date for the consideration of this proposal. So, we've had endless due diligence, and I know that the auditor general has made a number of important criticisms of the process. I don't want to go into that now, because I want to see this project succeed and I hope, at the end of the day, that the Welsh Government is going to give it the go-ahead. But does he not think that this tortuous process is far too long, even though this is a massive project for the future? Its transformative potential is so great that we should have got on with this much more diligently than we have.
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Rwy'n siŵr y byddaf yn cario'r Prif Weinidog gyda mi wrth ddweud bod y 10 munud diwethaf wedi profi, yn anad dim arall, bod yr amser i sgorio pwyntiau diffrwyth wedi hen fynd heibio yn yr ymgyrch etholiad cyffredinol hon i gael unrhyw effaith gadarnhaol y naill ffordd neu'r llall, ac felly y dylem ni ganolbwyntio mwy ar adeiladu dyfodol economaidd llwyddiannus i Gymru ar y cyd, gan gefnogi pleidiau eraill lle mae hynny'n angenrheidiol. Ac, i'r perwyl hwnnw, hoffwn gyfeirio yn ôl at y cwestiwn a ofynnodd Adam Price cyn cwestiynau arweinwyr y pleidiau, ac rwy'n derbyn yr hyn a ddywedodd y Prif Weinidog mewn ymateb i'w gwestiwn atodol ynghylch sut y mae'n rhaid i'r Llywodraeth gynnal diwydrwydd dyledus priodol ar y cynnig presennol, ond mae adroddiad yr archwilydd cyffredinol ar gyllid cychwynnol y prosiect hwn yn cynnwys catalog o gyfleoedd i ddiwydrwydd dyladwy gael ei gynnal yn ystod y pum mlynedd diwethaf, gan ddechrau gyda'r galw cais cynllunio i mewn yn 2012, a gymeradwywyd gan Carl Sargeant ar sail ei fanteision economaidd-gymdeithasol. Yn 2014, roedd gennym ni'r cyllid cychwynnol o £16 miliwn ar gyfer datblygu'r prosiect, ac yna cawsom ymchwiliad cyhoeddus i dadgofrestriad y tir comin. Yna, ym mis Ebrill 2016, gwrthododd Edwina Hart y cais gwarant cyntaf. Ym mis Gorffennaf 2016, gwrthododd Ken Skates yr ail gynnig gwarant, a arweiniodd wedyn at drafodaethau dwys gyda swyddogion ar amrywiaeth o faterion pwysig, ac yna, eleni, ym mis Ionawr, cawsom ni'r taflenni tymor wedi'u hariannu'n llawn a ddarparwyd gan y cwmni ac fe'n hysbyswyd y byddai diwydrwydd dyladwy yn para tair i bedair wythnos. Ymestynnwyd hynny wedyn i chwe wythnos ac yna fe'i hymestynnwyd ymhellach, ac mae'r Prif Weinidog heddiw wedi rhoi i ni, rwy'n gobeithio, dyddiad terfyn ar gyfer ystyried y cynnig hwn. Felly, rydym ni wedi cael diwydrwydd dyladwy diddiwedd, a gwn fod yr archwilydd cyffredinol wedi gwneud nifer o feirniadaethau pwysig o'r broses. Nid wyf eisiau trafod hynny nawr, gan fy mod i eisiau gweld y prosiect hwn yn llwyddo ac rwy'n gobeithio, yn y pen draw, bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn mynd i'w gymeradwyo. Ond onid yw'n credu bod y broses drofaus hon yn llawer rhy hir, er bod hwn yn brosiect enfawr ar gyfer y dyfodol? Mae ei botensial trawsnewidiol mor fawr y dylem ni fod wedi bwrw ymlaen â hyn yn llawer mwy diwyd nag yr ydym ni wedi ei wneud.