English: Thank you for your questions, David Melding. Llywydd, if I may - several questions there. First of all, on the issue around cavity spaces, the Member raises issues around that. I would be reluctant to offer a view on that in the prematurity of the public inquiry into that. I do think there were several aspects of the Grenfell Tower that appear to have significant factors in contribution to the fire system breakdown, whether that be compartmental or actual exterior failings, but I wouldn't like to pre-empt that. Of course, if cavity spaces are part of that process, then we need to look at that very carefully in the advice we receive. In terms of the cladding and the advice in terms of relocation, and giving advice to remove cladding, I'm taking the advice from the independent advisory group from the UK - the Department for Communities and Local Government. These are professionals, and I don't think this is a political decision. This should be based upon evidence and their advice. If they suggest that the removal of cladding is the best option, then we will seek to remove that cladding and we'll talk about the implications of finances after that. But the Member is right to also say that just removing the aluminium cladding of a building can pose a further risk by exposing the insulation process. So, we have to be measured in the processes that we are going to implement if we do do that. Also, the issue is that what the tests have been conducted on has been part of a composite of the unit. So, only a sample to provide whether the substance contained in the sample was flammable or combustible, whereas I think the next stages we possibly need to be looking at are about the whole-system approach in terms of where we're able to test a whole system to see whether the activity of that panel is safe and complies with British standards and the regulations, as was thought when it was installed. I think that could be the next stages that we move to - giving confidence to the people who live in those premises that the fire services have both checked and continue to work with tenants of the affected areas to give them reassurance about the safety implications of the fire systems that are in place. On the issue of Grenfell Tower, again, the Member raises issues about building regulations. I'd also raise a point of caution in terms of, again, understanding what the true effects are of testing. At this time, we are aware that our buildings have cladding installed that complies with building regulations, and therefore if the building regulations are wrong, then we have to have a review of that. I've got a meeting again with Lesley Griffiths in terms of the detail of that, but also listening to the advisory panel in terms of what their thoughts are on this. On other buildings - education, health and public buildings, leisure, stadiums - we have started the activity of asking for feedback from all of the relevant agencies. I've written to all Cabinet colleagues. I know that the Cabinet Secretary for Education has written to local authorities to ask around school buildings and other university buildings. My primary concern on a risk basis assessment is, first of all, the high-rise blocks of flats, and then I think we need to move to where people reside of an evening, cook, and there are, therefore, some student accommodation that should have a high priority in making sure that we are absolutely certain about the safety mechanisms around those. The other point of interest is in terms of the private sector, which is a little bit more difficult in terms of how we identify them. And I'm working with Ken Skates's department to look at what connections we have with private sector landlords and larger companies, but also for the Rent Smart Wales team, with the registration of landlords, to use the data around that to contact individuals around property management again. We do have powers of intervention, but there are lots of powers with other authorities in terms of non-compliance. So, if a private landlord was not to seek to comply with sample testing et cetera, then the local authority, or the fire service, indeed, could ask and require that with prohibition notices. So, we do have things in place subject to the need to do that.
Welsh: Diolch i chi am eich cwestiynau, David Melding. Llywydd, os caf i - mae nifer o gwestiynau yma. Yn gyntaf oll, ynghylch mannau ceudod, mae'r Aelod yn codi materion sy'n ymwneud â hynny. Byddwn yn amharod i gynnig barn ar hynny cyn yr ymchwiliad cyhoeddus ynglŷn â hynny. Rwy'n credu bod sawl agwedd ar Dŵr Grenfell yr ymddengys iddynt fod yn ffactorau arwyddocaol a gyfranodd at fethiant y system dân, boed hynny'n fethiannau yn rhaniadau'r adeilad neu ar y tu allan , ond ni fyddwn yn hoffi rhagdybio hynny. Wrth gwrs, os oedd manau ceudod yn rhan o'r broses honno, yna mae angen inni edrych ar hynny'n ofalus iawn yn y cyngor a gawn ni. O ran y cladin a'r cyngor o ran adleoli, a rhoi cyngor i gael gwared ar gladin, rwy'n cymryd y cyngor gan y grŵp cynghori annibynnol o'r DU - yr Adran Cymunedau a Llywodraeth Leol. Mae'r rhain yn bobl broffesiynol, ac nid wyf yn credu bod hwn yn benderfyniad gwleidyddol. Dylai hyn fod yn seiliedig ar dystiolaeth a'u cyngor. Os ydyn nhw'n awgrymu mai cael gwared ar y cladin yw'r dewis gorau, yna byddwn yn mynd ati i gael gwared ar y cladin a byddwn yn siarad am y goblygiadau ariannol ar ôl hynny. Ond mae'r Aelod yn iawn i ddweud hefyd y gall dim ond cael gwared ar gladin alwminiwm adeilad beri risg pellach drwy ddatgelu'r broses inswleiddio. Felly, mae'n rhaid i ni fod yn bwyllog yn y prosesau yr ydym ni am eu gweithredu os ydym am wneud hynny. Hefyd, mae a wnelo â'r ffaith fod y profion wedi eu cynnal ar ran o gyfansoddyn yr uned. Felly, dim ond sampl i weld a oedd y sylwedd yn y sampl yn fflamadwy neu hylosg, er fy mod yn meddwl bod a wnelo'r camau nesaf y dylem ni o bosib fod yn edrych arnyn nhw â'r system yn ei chyfanrwydd o ran a allwn ni brofi system gyfan er mwyn gweld a yw'r panel yn ddiogel ac yn cydymffurfio â safonau Prydeinig ac â'r rheoliadau, fel y tybiwyd pan gafodd ei osod. Rwy'n credu mai dyna'r camau nesaf y gallwn ni fod yn symud tuag atyn nhw - gan roi hyder i'r bobl sy'n byw yn yr adeiladau hynny bod y gwasanaethau tân wedi gwirio ac yn parhau i weithio gyda thenantiaid yr ardaloedd yr effeithiwyd arnyn nhw i roi sicrwydd iddyn nhw ynghylch goblygiadau diogelwch y systemau tân sydd ar waith. O ran Tŵr Grenfell, unwaith eto, fe gododd yr Aelod faterion ynghylch rheoliadau adeiladu. Hoffwn i hefyd nodi bod angen pwyll o ran, unwaith eto, deall gwir effeithiau profion. Ar hyn o bryd, rydym ni'n ymwybodol bod cladin wedi ei osod ar ein hadeiladau a bod hwnnw'n cydymffurfio â'r rheoliadau adeiladu. Felly os yw'r rheoliadau adeiladu yn anghywir, yna mae'n rhaid i ni gael adolygiad o hynny. Mae gen i gyfarfod eto gyda Lesley Griffiths i gael y manylion, ond rwyf hefyd yn gwrando ar y panel cynghori i gael eu barn nhw am hyn. Ynglŷn ag adeiladau eraill - adeiladau addysg iechyd a chyhoeddus eraill, rhai hamdden a stadiymau - rydym wedi dechrau ar y gwaith o ofyn am adborth gan bob un o'r asiantaethau perthnasol. Rwyf wedi ysgrifennu at fy holl gydweithwyr yn y Cabinet. Gwn fod Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Addysg wedi ysgrifennu at awdurdodau lleol i holi ynglŷn ag adeiladau ysgol ac adeiladau eraill y Brifysgol. Fy mhrif bryder o ran asesiad sail risg, yn gyntaf oll, yw'r blociau fflatiau aml-lawr, ac yna rwy'n credu bod angen canolbwyntio ar y lle mae pobl yn treulio'r nosweithiau, yn coginio, ac felly mae angen rhoi blaenoriaeth uchel i lety myfyrwyr i wneud yn siŵr ein bod yn gwbl sicr ynghylch y mecanweithiau diogelwch ar gyfer y rheini. Yr elfen arall o ddiddordeb yw o ran y sector preifat, sydd ychydig yn fwy anodd eu nodi. Ac rwy'n gweithio gydag adran Ken Skates yn edrych ar y cysylltiadau sydd gennym ni gyda landlordiaid y sector preifat a chwmnïau mwy o faint, ond hefyd ar gyfer tîm Rhentu Doeth Cymru, gyda chofrestru landlordiaid, i ddefnyddio'r data mewn cysylltiad â hynny i gysylltu â phobl ynglŷn â rheoli eiddo eto. Mae gennym ni rymoedd ymyrryd, ond mae gan awdurdodau eraill lawer o rymoedd o ran diffyg cydymffurfio. Felly, pe na bai landlord preifat yn cydymffurfio â phrofion sampl ac ati, yna gallai'r awdurdod lleol, neu'r gwasanaeth tân, yn wir, ofyn am hynny a'i gwneud yn ofynnol gyda hysbysiadau gwahardd. Felly, mae gennym ni bethau yn eu lle yn amodol ar yr angen i wneud hynny.