English: Thank you, Chair. I'll start by recognising that it is a positive step that the Government has laid amendment 6 and introduced a sunset clause after five years, and, of course, a one-time opportunity then to extend those powers for another five years. My concern with that is that the cycle of five years plus another five years is out of sync with the electoral cycle, and it's not ideal for practical reasons, and I'll expand on that in a minute. Amendment 5 too - we'll come on to that later - in terms of the review of the legislation after four years may face the same concern, possibly, but we'll come to that later. By not having a review before the next election, my concern is there will be no incentive to include plans to develop alternative arrangements in manifestos and so on by then. And without having something in a manifesto, I can hear the parties and the Government in the next Senedd saying, 'Well, there's no mandate, therefore, to change things after five years, and so we should continue for another five years.' That's the risk, isn't it? After five years from whenever the Act is implemented, and when we arrive at that trigger point to consider extending those five years, then the next Government, in the seventh Senedd, will have established a programme for government, they will have established a legislative programme, and we'll be in the situation where they will say, 'Well, we have to have another five years because we won't be able to do it in this Senedd.' So, I just feel that it's a little out of kilter, and the intention of my amendment is to reset that timetable slightly. I am being pragmatic, hopefully, and I accept that we will stick with the sunset clause after five years, but what about just expanding it for two, in order to force the next Government and the next Senedd to resolve this? Otherwise, the risk is that there will be plenty of reasons not to deal with it in the next Senedd and it will be kicked into the next Senedd, and suddenly this legislation will have been in place for a decade, and who knows where we will be by then? So, that's where I approach it in terms of my amendment, amendment 11 in this group, while recognising that amendment 6 by the Government is of course a positive step.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Gadeirydd. Fe wnaf i gychwyn drwy gydnabod ei bod hi'n gam positif fod y Llywodraeth wedi gosod gwelliant 6 a chyflwyno cymal machlud ar ôl pum mlynedd, ac wrth gwrs, cyfle untro wedyn i estyn y pwerau yna am bum mlynedd arall. Fy ngofid i gyda hynny yw bod y cylchdro yna o bum mlynedd plws pum mlynedd allan o sync gyda chylchdro etholiadol, a dyw e ddim yn ddelfrydol am resymau ymarferol, ac fe wnaf i ehangu ar hynny nawr mewn munud. Mae gwelliant 5 hefyd - fe ddown ni at hynny nes ymlaen - o ran adolygiad o'r ddeddfwriaeth ar ôl pedair blynedd efallai yn wynebu'r un benbleth, o bosib, ond fe ddown ni at hynny wedyn. Drwy beidio â chael adolygiad cyn yr etholiad nesaf, fy ngofid i yw bod dim cymhelliad i gynnwys cynlluniau i ddatblygu trefniadau amgen mewn maniffestos ac yn y blaen erbyn hynny. A heb fod yna rywbeth mewn maniffesto, fe allaf i glywed pleidiau a Llywodraeth y Senedd nesaf yn troi rownd a dweud, 'Wel, does dim mandad, felly, i newid pethau ar ôl pum mlynedd, ac felly mae'n well inni barhau am bum mlynedd arall.' A dyna'r risg, onid ife? Ar ôl pum mlynedd o bryd bynnag fydd y Ddeddf yn cael ei gweithredu, a phan fydd y triger yna'n dod i ystyried estyn am bum mlynedd arall, mi fydd y Llywodraeth nesaf yn y seithfed Senedd wedi sefydlu rhaglen lywodraethu, mi fyddan nhw wedi sefydlu rhaglen ddeddfu, ac fe fyddwn ni mewn sefyllfa lle fyddan nhw'n dweud bryd hynny, 'Wel, mae'n rhaid inni gael pum mlynedd arall achos dŷn ni ddim yn mynd i allu ei wneud e yn y Senedd yma.' Felly, dwi jest yn teimlo ei fod e mas o kilter ychydig, a bwriad fy ngwelliant i yw jest ail-setio'r amserlen yna ychydig. Dwi'n bod, gobeithio, yn bragmatig ac yn derbyn y gwnawn ni sticio gyda chymal machlud ar ôl pum mlynedd, ond beth am ddim ond ei ehangu fe am ddwy, er mwyn gorfodi'r Llywodraeth nesaf a'r Senedd nesaf i ddatrys hyn? Neu, fel arall, y risg yw fe fydd yna ddigon o resymau i beidio â delio ag e yn y Senedd nesaf a bydd e'n cael ei gicio i mewn i'r Senedd wedyn, ac yn sydyn iawn bydd y ddeddfwriaeth yma wedi bod mewn lle am ddegawd, a phwy a ŵyr le fyddwn ni erbyn hynny? Felly, dyna le dwi'n dod ato fe o safbwynt fy ngwelliant i, gwelliant 11 yn y grŵp yma, tra yn cydnabod bod gwelliant 6 gan y Llywodraeth, wrth gwrs, yn gam positif.