English: I thank Huw Irranca-Davies for that question. There were two shocking things about the CSR announced earlier this month: first, that it only lasted for one year, whereas we were being promised by the Conservative Government at Westminster right up until July that it would be a three-year settlement that we would have, and that evaporated in a matter of weeks. And surely it was shocking to everybody in this Chamber that the Chancellor made not a single mention of the shared prosperity fund. Month after month after month, we are told by UK Ministers that they will honour their promise to Wales that we would not be a penny worse off as a result of leaving the European Union because they have a shared prosperity fund. Month after month, we are told that it's only round the corner that they will have a consultation on that fund, and we will be able to see the colour of their money. Now we know that we're not going to hear anything until the next calendar year, and the Chancellor failed to mention it even once. The amount of money we expect to get through the shared prosperity fund would be in excess of the £600 million that Nick Ramsay mentioned as coming through the CSR. Huw Irranca-Davies is absolutely right to point to the fact that without that certainty, our partners here in Wales are unable to plan ahead in the way we would want them to do. I have had an opportunity to see the UK in a Changing Europe report. A 'no deal' means a prolonged period of uncertainty; half of UK goods exports will face disruption. It will reduce the safety of UK citizens; the UK's international reputation may suffer. Is there any wonder why time after time after time on the floor of this Chamber we have warned about the catastrophic effect that leaving the European Union without a deal will have here in Wales?
Welsh: Diolchaf i Huw Irranca-Davies am y cwestiwn yna. Roedd dau beth syfrdanol am yr adolygiad cynhwysfawr o wariant a gyhoeddwyd yn gynharach y mis hwn: yn gyntaf, ei fod yn para am flwyddyn yn unig, er yr addawyd i ni gan y Llywodraeth Geidwadol yn San Steffan hyd at fis Gorffennaf mai setliad tair blynedd y byddem ni'n ei gael, a diflannodd hynny mewn mater o wythnosau. Ac mae'n sicr ei bod yn syndod i bawb yn y Siambr hon na wnaeth y Canghellor unrhyw gyfeiriad at y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin. Fis ar ôl mis ar ôl mis, dywedir wrthym gan Weinidogion y DU y byddan nhw'n anrhydeddu eu haddewid i Gymru na fyddem ni yr un geiniog yn waeth ein byd o ganlyniad i adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd gan fod ganddyn nhw gronfa ffyniant gyffredin. Fis ar ôl mis, dywedir wrthym y byddan nhw'n cael ymgynghoriad ar y gronfa honno yn fuan iawn, ac y byddwn yn gallu gweld lliw eu harian. Nawr rydym ni'n gwybod nad ydym ni'n mynd i glywed dim tan y flwyddyn galendr nesaf, ac ni chyfeiriodd y Canghellor ati hyd yn oed unwaith. Byddai'r swm o arian yr ydym ni'n disgwyl ei gael drwy'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin yn fwy na'r £600 miliwn y dywedodd Nick Ramsay a fyddai'n dod drwy'r adolygiad cynhwysfawr o wariant. Mae Huw Irranca-Davies yn llygad ei le i dynnu sylw at y ffaith nad yw ein partneriaid yma yng Nghymru, heb y sicrwydd hwnnw, yn gallu cynllunio ymlaen llaw fel y byddem ni'n dymuno iddyn nhw ei wneud. Rwyf i wedi cael cyfle i weld adroddiad UK in a Changing Europe. Mae 'dim cytundeb' yn golygu cyfnod hirfaith o ansicrwydd; bydd tarfu ar hanner allforion nwyddau'r DU. Bydd yn lleihau diogelwch dinasyddion y DU; gallai enw da rhyngwladol y DU ddioddef. A oes unrhyw ryfedd pam, dro ar ôl tro ar ôl tro ar lawr y Siambr hon, ein bod ni wedi rhybuddio am yr effaith drychinebus y bydd gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd heb gytundeb yn ei chael yma yng Nghymru?