English: I'm grateful to the Cabinet Secretary for his statement, and I've got four questions. Firstly, I recognise that, when he says that 30 hours of provision a week, 48 hours a year will be the most generous offer available in the UK, he is right. The delivery is still to come, but I would credit both him and his party, and the Welsh Government, with the ambition and what they're trying to achieve in this area. He mentioned UK Government-imposed austerity; would he in turn recognise that the relative lack of generosity of the childcare provision to date has also been something that has held back and made things more difficult for at least some families in Wales? Second, the quality of existing provision has generally been considered to be good, with two and a half hours a day, five days a week in a school environment. I just wonder, when he says in his statement, 'Our new childcare offer will include our successful foundation phase provision during term times, with supporting childcare', does that mean that any expansion of provision in school settings will be a different type of childcare added on to that two and a half hours? I had perhaps hoped that, in some areas, the two and a half hours of often good-quality provision in schools might perhaps be extended to six hours per day. Is that going to be happening in at least some of the pilot areas, or is it envisaged it would be a less educational emphasis and perhaps a cheaper childcare wraparound in addition to the existing provision? Third, he speaks about capacity and shortage of capacity in some areas of Wales. What is the Welsh Government's view as to where those areas of shortage are? Speaking from a personal capacity, I've been impressed by the range of choice and available capacity that there is. When he talks of the pilots, and six from autumn next year - is it his assessment of lack of capacity that is the limit on how quickly and widely he can roll out these trials or is that a constraint of finance within the budget that's available to him? Finally, and picking up, really, on the previous speaker, the issue of quality I think really is important here. Certainly, my impression, too, reading and listening to the statement, was of a was a very strong emphasis on the economics of the benefits of childcare and how much working parents will appreciate this offer, as indeed we will. But there was certainly less in his statement about the impact on the children of the expanded childcare provision, and one of the arguments some put forward for state-supported childcare is that the quality of provision, particularly for, perhaps, children from less well-off families, can be something that improves their life chances. I think, with the pilot projects he proposes, there's a real opportunity to both focus on that but also test that. As well as looking at what do parents feel about the provision, how do councils cope with the logistics, what's the interface with the Welsh Government, what's working best from that logistical-type standpoint - could he also make some provision for some academic study of the pilot programme, so we actually see whether the availability of the pilot programmes in some councils, or in areas of some councils compared to others, feeds through down the road to improved outcomes and particularly, perhaps, early test scores for the children who have benefitted from those pilots? Thank you, I'm grateful.
Welsh: Rwy'n ddiolchgar i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet am ei ddatganiad, ac mae gennyf bedwar cwestiwn. Yn gyntaf, rwy'n cydnabod, pan mae'n dweud mai 30 awr o ddarpariaeth yr wythnos, 48 awr y flwyddyn fydd y cynnig mwyaf hael sydd ar gael yn y DU, ei fod yn gywir. Mae'r gwaith o gyflawni hyn i ddod, ond byddwn yn rhoi clod iddo ef a'i blaid, a Llywodraeth Cymru, am yr uchelgais a'r hyn y maent yn ceisio ei gyflawni yn y maes hwn. Soniodd am y llymder a osodwyd gan Lywodraeth y DU; a fyddai ef yn ei dro yn cydnabod bod y diffyg haelioni cymharol o ran y ddarpariaeth gofal plant hyd yma hefyd wedi bod yn rhywbeth sydd wedi dal o leiaf rhai teuluoedd yng Nghymru yn ôl ac wedi gwneud pethau'n fwy anodd iddynt? Yn ail, ystyriwyd bod ansawdd y ddarpariaeth bresennol yn dda yn gyffredinol, gan gynnwys dwy awr a hanner y dydd, bum niwrnod yr wythnos mewn amgylchedd ysgol. Rwyf yn meddwl tybed, pan ddywed yn ei ddatganiad, Bydd ein cynnig gofal plant newydd yn cynnwys ein darpariaeth cyfnod sylfaen lwyddiannus yn ystod y tymor, ynghyd â gofal plant ategol, a yw hynny'n golygu y bydd unrhyw ehangu'r ddarpariaeth mewn lleoliadau ysgol yn fath gwahanol o ofal plant wedi'i ychwanegu at y ddwy awr a hanner hynny? Roeddwn wedi gobeithio efallai, mewn rhai ardaloedd, y byddai'r ddwy awr a hanner o ddarpariaeth o ansawdd da yn aml mewn ysgolion yn cael eu hymestyn i chwe awr y dydd. A fydd hynny'n digwydd mewn o leiaf rhai o'r ardaloedd peilot, neu a ragwelir y byddai'n bwyslais llai addysgol ac efallai'n ddarpariaeth gofal plant cofleidiol rhatach yn ychwanegol at y ddarpariaeth bresennol? Yn drydydd, mae'n sôn am allu a phrinder gallu mewn rhai ardaloedd o Gymru. Beth yw barn Llywodraeth Cymru am ble y mae'r ardaloedd hynny o brinder? Gan siarad yn bersonol, mae'r ystod o ddewisiadau a'r gallu sydd ar gael wedi creu argraff arnaf. Pan mae'n sôn am y cynlluniau peilot, a chwech ohonynt o'r hydref y flwyddyn nesaf - ai ei asesiad o ddiffyg gallu sy'n cyfyngu ar ba mor gyflym ac eang y gall gyflwyno'r treialon hyn neu a yw'n gyfyngiad o ran y cyllid o fewn y gyllideb sydd ar gael iddo? Yn olaf, a chan gyfeirio, mewn gwirionedd, at y siaradwr blaenorol, rwy'n credu bod y mater ynghylch ansawdd yn bwysig iawn yma. Yn sicr, fy argraff i hefyd, wrth ddarllen a gwrando ar y datganiad, oedd bod pwyslais cryf iawn ar elfennau economaidd manteision gofal plant a chymaint y bydd rhieni sy'n gweithio yn gwerthfawrogi'r cynnig hwn, fel y byddwn yn wir. Ond yn sicr roedd llai yn ei ddatganiad am effaith y ddarpariaeth gofal plant estynedig ar y plant, ac un o'r dadleuon a gyflwynodd rhai o blaid gofal plant a gefnogir gan y wladwriaeth yw bod ansawdd y ddarpariaeth, yn enwedig o ran plant o deuluoedd llai cefnog efallai, yn gallu bod yn rhywbeth sy'n gwella eu cyfleoedd mewn bywyd. Rwy'n credu, yn sgil y prosiectau peilot y mae'n eu cynnig, fod cyfle gwirioneddol i ganolbwyntio ar hynny, a phrofi hynny hefyd. Yn ogystal ag ystyried sut y mae rhieni yn teimlo am y ddarpariaeth, sut y mae cynghorau yn ymdopi â'r logisteg, beth yw'r cysylltiad â Llywodraeth Cymru, beth sy'n gweithio orau o safbwynt logisteg - a allai hefyd wneud rhywfaint o ddarpariaeth ar gyfer astudiaeth academaidd o'r rhaglen beilot, fel y gallwn weld mewn gwirionedd a yw argaeledd y rhaglenni peilot mewn rhai cynghorau, neu mewn ardaloedd rhai cynghorau, o gymharu ag eraill, yn arwain yn y pen draw at well canlyniadau ac, yn arbennig, efallai, sgoriau profion cynnar ar gyfer y plant sydd wedi elwa ar y cynlluniau peilot hynny? Diolch i chi, rwy'n ddiolchgar.