English: I don't have any concerns with regard to the Bill itself, other than one thing that Ioan has already referred to, namely that historic concept by now, a weak concept, in terms of meeting demand. That isn't part of the mindset at the moment within the statutory education sector, and I'm surprised to see that kind of concept reiterated within this Bill. So, we do place the duty on the commission in the first instance to increase tertiary education provision, but to all intents and purposes, we do that by saying, 'If there isn't an increase in demand, we don't expect more from you.' And that's the situation that we've been in for a decade or more by now, although, as Ioan has said, there has been a change, I think, in terms of the principle and the requirements on the Coleg Cymraeg Cenedlaethol within their action plan, and the desire within the Government to take action in the same way within their language strategy. So, I do think that including meeting the demand within this Bill is very disappointing, truth be told. I do agree with Ioan as well; after that, I think that there is no problem with the Bill other than that, but what we will need to see is how the Bill is implemented. So, in the first instance, there is a question with regard to what kind of ambition the individual Ministers have in terms of their declaration of priorities that will be given to the commission in the first place. And then after that, what is the ambition of the commission itself, the members, chief executive and chair, with regard to what is included within the strategic plan. There is, of course, scope for a Minister to adapt the strategic plan if he or she isn't content with that strategic plan. And then, we go down to the level of the agreement with the providers themselves, in terms of what the requirements on them will be. So, I think that the way that the Bill will be implemented is the way that we will then see whether the ambition is then a reality on the ground.
Welsh: Does gen i ddim unrhyw bryder ynglŷn â'r Bil ei hun, heblaw un peth y mae Ioan eisoes wedi cyfeirio ato, sef y cysyniad hanesyddol yma erbyn hyn, a chysyniad gwan, o ran ateb y galw. Dydy hynny ddim yn rhan o'r meddylfryd erbyn hyn o fewn y sector addysg statudol, a dwi'n synnu braidd gweld y math gysyniad o fewn y Bil yma. Felly, rydyn ni'n rhoi'r dyletswydd ar y comisiwn yn y lle cyntaf i gynyddu darpariaeth addysg drydyddol, ond i bob pwrpas, rydyn ni'n gwneud hynny trwy ddweud, 'Os does yna ddim cynnydd yn y galw, fyddwn ni ddim yn disgwyl mwy ganddoch chi.' A dyna'r sefyllfa rydyn ni wedi bod ynddi ers degawd neu fwy erbyn hyn, er, fel y mae Ioan wedi dweud, mae yna newid wedi bod, dwi'n meddwl, yn yr egwyddor o ran y gofynion sydd ar y Coleg Cymraeg Cenedlaethol o fewn eu cynllun gweithredu nhw, a'r awydd sydd o fewn y Llywodraeth i weithredu yn yr un modd o fewn eu strategaeth iaith nhw. Felly, dwi'n meddwl bod cynnwys ateb y galw o fewn y Bil yma yn siomedig dros ben, a dweud y gwir. Dwi'n cytuno â Ioan hefyd; ar ôl hynny, dwi'n meddwl nad oes problem gyda'r Bil, ond beth fydd angen ei weld yw sut fydd y Bil yn cael ei weithredu. Felly, yn y lle cyntaf, mae yna gwestiwn ynglŷn â pha fath o uchelgais fydd gan y Gweinidogion unigol o ran eu datganiad o flaenoriaethau a fydd yn cael ei roi i'r comisiwn yn y lle cyntaf. Ar ôl hynny, beth ydy uchelgais y comisiwn ei hun, yr aelodau, y prif weithredwr a'r cadeirydd, o ran beth fydd yn cael ei gynnwys o fewn y cynllun strategol. Mae yna, wrth gwrs, le hefyd i Weinidog addasu'r cynllun strategol os ydy o neu hi ddim yn fodlon efo'r cynllun strategol. Ac wedyn, rydyn ni'n mynd i lawr i'r lefel o ran y cytundebau efo'r darparwyr eu hunain, o ran beth fydd y gofynion arnyn nhw. Felly, dwi'n meddwl mai'r ffordd bydd y Bil yn cael ei weithredu fydd y ffordd fyddwn ni'n gweld os ydy'r uchelgais yn cael ei weld ar lawr gwlad.