techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: First Minister, this is First Minister's questions, and that's why we ask you questions and we look for answers from you. We don't seem to get many answers on a week-by-week basis. But, last week, in the Economy, Infrastructure and Skills Committee, the senior civil servant who was dealing with this in the Cabinet Secretary's department indicated that the project cost was somewhere near £1.4 billion to £1.5 billion. The actual figures that have been lodged with the inquiry are £1.3 billion to £1.4 billion. They're actually lodged with the inquiry, those figures are. Only two years ago, you were stating that it was going to be nowhere near £1 billion and would be considerably less than that figure. One hundred and sixty civil servants at that time, as given to us by the Minister, were tied up with this particular project. I ask you again: what has gone wrong? This is the key infrastructure project that the Welsh Government is challenging to deliver. The project costs, if your estimations at that time were to be believed, have nearly doubled, by the civil service's own figures that they put to the inquiry and also identified by the Cabinet Secretary in that committee.
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog yw'r sesiwn hon, a dyna pam mai ni sy'n gofyn cwestiynau i chi ac yn chwilio am atebion gennych chi. Nid yw'n ymddangos ein bod ni'n cael llawer o atebion o wythnos i wythnos. Ond, yr wythnos diwethaf, ym Mhwyllgor yr Economi, Seilwaith a Sgiliau, nododd yr uwch was sifil a oedd yn ymdrin â hyn yn adran Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet fod cost y prosiect oddeutu £1.4 biliwn i £1.5 biliwn. Ond £1.3 biliwn i £1.4 biliwn yw'r ffigurau gwirioneddol a gyflwynwyd i'r ymchwiliad. Mae'r ffigurau hynny wedi eu cyflwyno i'r ymchwiliad, y ffigurau hynny. Dim ond dwy flynedd yn ôl, roeddech chi'n datgan nad oedd yn mynd i fod unrhyw beth yn agos at £1 biliwn ac y byddai gryn dipyn yn llai na'r ffigur hwnnw. Roedd cant a thrigain o weision sifil ar yr adeg honno, fel y dywedwyd wrthym gan y Gweinidog, ynghlwm i'r prosiect penodol hwn. Gofynnaf ichi eto: beth sydd wedi mynd o'i le? Mae hwn yn brosiect seilwaith allweddol y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn herio i'w gyflawni. Mae costau'r prosiect, os oedd eich amcangyfrifon ar yr adeg honno i'w credu, wedi dyblu bron, ar sail ffigurau'r gwasanaeth sifil ei hun a gyflwynwyd ganddo i'r ymchwiliad ac a nodwyd hefyd gan Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn y pwyllgor hwnnw.
English: Well, first of all, inflation - that makes a difference to the figures; and, secondly, the UK Government is charging VAT. The UK Government is charging VAT. Here's a challenge for him: why doesn't he go back to his party and say, 'Don't charge VAT for this project'? That would save us hundreds of millions of pounds.
Welsh: Wel, yn gyntaf oll, chwyddiant - mae hynny'n gwneud gwahaniaeth i'r ffigurau; ac, yn ail, mae Llywodraeth y DU yn codi TAW. Mae Llywodraeth y DU yn codi TAW. Dyma her iddo: pam na wnaiff ef fynd yn ôl at ei blaid a dweud, 'Peidiwch â chodi TAW ar y prosiect hwn'? Byddai hynny'n arbed cannoedd o filiynau o bunnoedd i ni.
English: That is awful, First Minister. This is your biggest infrastructure project. The negotiations around VAT are still ongoing. Without VAT - and these are the words of your own civil servant in that committee - the costs of this project are in the region of £1.3 billion to £1.4 billion. Only two years ago, you were trying to convince people that this project was going to come in at £800 million. I asked you to let us see that information so we could have confidence that you were building a project on sound finances. All this has been undone. Can you commit now today that there is an upper limit where this project is viable, and if there isn't that upper limit, will you be whipping your backbenchers and having Cabinet responsibility to vote this project through, whatever the cost?
Welsh: Mae hynna'n ofnadwy, Prif Weinidog. Hwn yw eich prosiect seilwaith mwyaf. Mae'r trafodaethau ynghylch TAW yn parhau. Heb TAW - a geiriau eich gwas sifil eich hun yn y pwyllgor hwnnw yw'r rhain - mae costau'r prosiect hwn oddeutu £1.3 biliwn i £1.4 biliwn. Dim ond dwy flynedd yn ôl, roeddech chi'n ceisio argyhoeddi pobl bod y prosiect hwn yn mynd i gostio £800 miliwn. Gofynnais i chi am gael gweld yr wybodaeth honno fel y gallem ni fod yn hyderus eich bod chi'n adeiladu prosiect ar sail cyllid cadarn. Mae hyn i gyd wedi ei ddadwneud. A allwch chi ymrwymo heddiw bod terfyn uchaf lle mae'r prosiect hwn yn ddichonadwy, ac os nad oes y terfyn uchaf hwnnw, a fyddwch chi'n chwipio aelodau eich meinciau cefn ac yn cael cyfrifoldeb Cabinet i bleidleisio dros y prosiect hwn, beth bynnag fo'r gost?
English: He didn't know about the VAT, did he? That was one of the issues that's blind-sided him.
Welsh: Doedd e ddim yn gwybod am y TAW, oedd e? Roedd hwnnw'n un o'r materion sy'n newyddion iddo.
English: Those discussions are ongoing.
Welsh: Mae'r trafodaethau hynny'n parhau.
English: I'm surprised that the leader of the opposition isn't aware of the VAT issue, and has not said anything publicly to support the Welsh Government and the Welsh taxpayer. It's one thing to say that negotiations are ongoing, but why isn't he standing up and saying to the Conservative Party - a Conservative Party that took funding away from electrification of the railways to spend outside of Wales; a Conservative Party that is trying to increase the price of the M4 project; a Conservative Party that claimed it was reducing the tolls on the Severn bridge when all it was doing was removing VAT that it wasn't legally able to charge in the first place. I mean, we talk about spinning, but what we have here is a whirling dervish. We will deliver transport projects for the people of Wales in the teeth of opposition from the Conservatives.
Welsh: Rwy'n synnu nad yw arweinydd yr Wrthblaid yn ymwybodol o'r mater TAW, ac nad yw wedi dweud dim yn gyhoeddus i gefnogi Llywodraeth Cymru a threthdalwyr Cymru. Un peth yw dweud bod trafodaethau yn parhau, ond pam nad yw e'n sefyll ar ei draed ac yn dweud wrth y Blaid Geidwadol - Plaid Geidwadol a gymerodd gyllid oddi wrth trydaneiddio'r rheilffyrdd i'w wario y tu allan i Gymru; Plaid Geidwadol sy'n ceisio cynyddu pris prosiect yr M4; Plaid Geidwadol a honnodd ei bod yn lleihau'r tollau ar bont Hafren pan mai'r cwbl yr oedd yn ei wneud oedd cael gwared ar TAW nad oedd yn gallu ei godi'n gyfreithlon yn y lle cyntaf. Hynny yw, rydym ni'n sôn am sbinio, ond mae gennym ni dderfis chwyrlïol yma. Byddwn yn darparu prosiectau trafnidiaeth ar gyfer pobl Cymru yn nannedd gwrthwynebiad gan y Ceidwadwyr.
English: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Llywydd. Emergency hospital consultants in Wales have recently written to the First Minister claiming that safety is being compromised to an unacceptable degree. The Royal College of Emergency Medicines has described accident and emergency units as battlefields. Dr Tim Rogerson, a consultant in emergency medicine at the Royal Gwent Hospital has said about the picture across Wales, 'We're on our knees as far as emergency care [is concerned]. We have patients coming into emergency departments that are already full.' The consultants have asked the First Minister to review as a matter of urgency the number of beds available for acute care, and for a significant increase in funding for social care. Is he going to accede to that request?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Llywydd. Mae meddygon ymgynghorol ysbyty brys yng Nghymru wedi ysgrifennu at y Prif Weinidog yn ddiweddar yn honni bod diogelwch yn cael ei beryglu i raddau annerbyniol. Mae Coleg Brenhinol meddygaeth frys wedi disgrifio unedau damweiniau ac achosion brys fel meysydd cad. Mae Dr Tim Rogerson, meddyg ymgynghorol ym maes meddygaeth frys yn Ysbyty Brenhinol Gwent, wedi dweud am y darlun ledled Cymru, Rydym ni ar ein gliniau cyn belled ag y mae gofal brys [yn y cwestiwn]. Mae gennym ni gleifion sy'n dod i adrannau achosion brys sydd eisoes yn llawn. Mae'r meddygon ymgynghorol wedi gofyn i'r Prif Weinidog adolygu fel mater o frys nifer y gwelyau sydd ar gael ar gyfer gofal acíwt, ac am gynnydd sylweddol i gyllid ar gyfer gofal cymdeithasol. A yw e'n mynd i gytuno i'r cais hwnnw?
English: First of all, I'm aware of the pressures there have been on emergency staff, and I thank them for what they have done. It has been very difficult, given intense spikes in demand - unpredicatble spikes in demand at certain days in the course of the holiday period. We would be delighted - delighted - to spend more on health and social care if the brakes were taken off by the Chancellor of the Exchequer. The Cabinet Secretary for Finance only last week outlined that we could be up to £4 billion better off if previous trends had been followed. That is a significant investment we could make in the health service. So, yes, we agree with the consultants that we want to spend more money on health and social care. Where are we going to take it from? Schools? Because that's the only place we can go. Put the council tax up? Because that's what will happen if we take money away from local government. We need to make sure the UK Government - . Boris Johnson today, saying there should be £100 million a week available for the NHS in England. That would mean £300 million more available in Wales. On that, if nothing else, I support Boris Johnson.
Welsh: Yn gyntaf oll, rwy'n ymwybodol o'r pwysau a fu ar staff brys, ac rwy'n diolch iddyn nhw am yr hyn y maen nhw wedi ei wneud. Mae wedi bod yn anodd iawn, o ystyried achosion o gynnydd sydyn i alw - cynnydd sydyn i alw na ellid ei ragweld ar ddiwrnodau penodol yn ystod cyfnod y gwyliau. Byddem ni wrth ein boddau - wrth ein boddau - gwario mwy ar iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol pe byddai Canghellor y Trysorlys yn gollwng y brêcs. Amlinellodd Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Gyllid dim ond yr wythnos diwethaf y gallem ni fod hyd at £4 biliwn yn well ein byd pe byddai tueddiadau blaenorol wedi cael eu dilyn. Mae hynny'n fuddsoddiad sylweddol y gallem ni ei wneud yn y gwasanaeth iechyd. Felly, ydym, rydym ni'n cytuno â'r meddygon ymgynghorol ein bod ni eisiau gwario mwy o arian ar iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol. O ble'r ydym ni'n mynd i'w gymryd? Ysgolion? Oherwydd dyna'r unig le y gallwn ni fynd. Cynyddu'r dreth gyngor? Oherwydd dyna fydd yn digwydd os byddwn ni'n cymryd arian oddi ar lywodraeth leol. Mae angen i ni wneud yn siŵr bod Llywodraeth y DU - . Boris Johnson heddiw, yn dweud bod £100 miliwn yr wythnos ar gael ar gyfer y GIG yn Lloegr. Byddai hynny'n golygu £300 miliwn yn fwy ar gael yng Nghymru. Ar hynny, os dim byd arall, rwy'n cefnogi Boris Johnson.
English: I'm delighted to hear that, because as a result of leaving the European Union there will be more money to spend on the health service. [ Interruption.] In answer to the leader of Plaid Cymru - . It's the way you tell them. In answer to the leader of Plaid Cymru earlier on, he said that beds don't really matter; it's how quickly you move people out of them. But the truth of the matter is there's been a very substantial cut in the number of beds available in hospitals throughout Wales in the last seven years - roughly 20 per cent to 25 per cent depending on the health board - but the occupancy rate of those beds has barely moved, and it is higher and has been, as the leader of Plaid Cymru pointed out, above the safe level of 85 per cent now for seven years. Surely, within the priorities of the health service for which the First Minister is responsible, not Boris Johnson, there should be some kind of change to ensure that hospital safety is actually taken very seriously by this Government.
Welsh: Rwy'n falch iawn o glywed hynny, oherwydd o ganlyniad i adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, bydd mwy o arian i'w wario ar y gwasanaeth iechyd. [ Torri ar draws.] Wrth ateb arweinydd Plaid Cymru - . Yr amseru sy'n bwysig. Wrth ateb arweinydd Plaid Cymru yn gynharach, dywedodd nad yw gwelyau'n bwysig mewn gwirionedd; pa mor gyflym yr ydych chi'n symud pobl allan ohonyn nhw sy'n bwysig. Ond y gwir amdani yw bu gostyngiad sylweddol iawn i nifer y gwelyau sydd ar gael mewn ysbytai ledled Cymru yn ystod y saith mlynedd diwethaf - tua 20 y cant i 25 y cant yn dibynnu ar y bwrdd iechyd - ond prin y mae cyfradd defnydd y gwelyau hynny wedi newid, ac mae'n uwch nag y bu, fel y nododd arweinydd Plaid Cymru, uwchlaw'r lefel ddiogel o 85 y cant ers saith mlynedd erbyn hyn. Yn sicr, o fewn y blaenoriaethau'r gwasanaeth iechyd y mae'r Prif Weinidog yn gyfrifol amdanynt, nid Boris Johnson, dylai fod rhyw fath o newid i sicrhau bod diogelwch mewn ysbytai yn cael ei gymryd o ddifrif gan y Llywodraeth hon.
English: It's a matter for health boards to ensure they have sufficient beds available. It's not right to say that I said beds weren't important: I said they were only part of the picture. If you look, for example, in England, where spending on social care has been hammered, England is now reaping what it has sown. We have made sure through, for example, the integrated care fund, that more people can leave hospital when they are ready. We're seeing delayed transfers of care dropping, whereas in England, of course, social care is on the verge of collapse. If you don't believe me, listen to council leaders - Conservative council leaders - in England, who are saying just that.
Welsh: Mater i fyrddau iechyd yw sicrhau bod ganddyn nhw ddigon o welyau ar gael. Nid yw'n iawn i ddweud fy mod i wedi dweud nad oedd gwelyau'n bwysig: dywedais mai dim ond rhan o'r darlun ydyn nhw. Os edrychwch chi, er enghraifft, yn Lloegr, lle mae gwariant ar ofal cymdeithasol wedi cael ei daro'n galed, mae Lloegr yn medi'r hyn a heuodd erbyn hyn. Rydym ni wedi sicrhau drwy, er enghraifft, y gronfa gofal integredig, y gall mwy o bobl adael yr ysbyty pan fyddan nhw'n barod. Rydym ni'n gweld achosion o oedi wrth drosglwyddo gofal yn gostwng, tra bod gofal cymdeithasol yn Lloegr, wrth gwrs, ar fin chwalu. Os nad ydych chi'n fy nghredu i, gwrandewch ar arweinwyr cynghorau - arweinwyr cynghorau Ceidwadol - yn Lloegr, sy'n dweud yn union hynny.
English: Sorry, I wasn't aware that the First Minister had finished as there was so much noise coming from other parts of the Chamber. The whole point of my question was not about social care, but about beds in hospitals and hospital care. The consultants who wrote to the First Minister last week said that emergency departments in Wales were, in some ways, worse than in England. Staff are arriving for work to find patients in the emergency department who were there the previous day, and multiple staff are in tears because they feel they cannot deliver the care that patients need. The consultants also claim that the four-hour target figures for best performing hospitals in Wales were similar to some of the worst performing hospitals in England. Surely, that is an indictment of 20 years of Labour Government in Wales.
Welsh: Mae'n ddrwg gennyf, nid oeddwn i'n ymwybodol bod y Prif Weinidog wedi gorffen gan fod cymaint o sŵn yn dod o rannau eraill y Siambr. Nid oedd holl bwynt fy nghwestiwn yn ymwneud â gofal cymdeithasol, ond â gwelyau mewn ysbytai a gofal ysbyty. Dywedodd y meddygon ymgynghorol a ysgrifennodd at y Prif Weinidog yr wythnos diwethaf bod adrannau achosion brys yng Nghymru, mewn rhai ffyrdd, yn waeth nag yn Lloegr. Mae staff yn cyrraedd y gwaith i ganfod cleifion yn yr adran achosion brys a oedd yno y diwrnod cynt, ac mae sawl aelod o staff mewn dagrau gan eu bod yn teimlo na allant ddarparu'r gofal sydd ei angen ar gleifion. Mae'r meddygon ymgynghorol hefyd yn honni bod y ffigurau targed o bedair awr ar gyfer yr ysbytai sy'n perfformio orau yng Nghymru yn debyg i rai o'r ysbytai sy'n perfformio waethaf yn Lloegr. Yn sicr, mae hynny'n gondemniad o 20 mlynedd o Lywodraeth Lafur yng Nghymru.
English: There are question marks over England's figures for a start. That doesn't diminish, of course, the pressures there have been on emergency services in Wales and I certainly don't seek to belittle that in any way, shape or form. But the question is this: should you divorce the issue of health and social care, as he's trying to do with his third question? The answer is, 'No, you cannot.' The two are integrated, the two are the same, they're integrated in terms of the service they seek to deliver to people and we have put money into that through the integrated care fund, making sure that people are able to leave hospital when they are able. What England did was to try to spend money on health and starve social care of money, effectively taking away from social care and putting into health, and now England is reaping the whirlwind of that. We always took the view that health and social care had to be seen in the round and that one was strongly linked to the other. If we look, for example, just beyond that to the Additional Learning Needs and Education Tribunal (Wales) Bill; that looks at bringing together education and health provision for young people as well. So, we've made sure, when it comes to spending, that spending in Wales is higher per head than in England on health and on social care to make sure that we don't let our people down just like the Government has done in England.
Welsh: Ceir marciau cwestiwn ynghylch ffigurau Lloegr i ddechrau. Nid yw hynny'n lleihau, wrth gwrs, y pwysau sydd wedi bod ar wasanaethau brys yng Nghymru, ac yn sicr nid wyf yn ceisio bychanu hynny mewn unrhyw ffordd o gwbl. Ond y cwestiwn yw hwn: a ddylech chi wahanu'r mater o iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol, fel y mae e'n ceisio ei wneud gyda'i drydydd cwestiwn? Yr ateb yw, 'Na, allwch chi ddim.' Mae'r ddau wedi eu hintegreiddio, mae'r ddau yr un fath, maen nhw'n integredig o ran y gwasanaeth y maen nhw'n ceisio ei ddarparu i bobl ac rydym ni wedi cyfrannu arian at hynny drwy'r gronfa gofal integredig, gan wneud yn siŵr y gall pobl adael yr ysbyty pan eu bod yn gallu. Yr hyn a wnaeth Lloegr oedd ceisio gwario'r arian ar iechyd ac amddifadu gofal cymdeithasol o arian, gan gymryd oddi wrth gofal cymdeithasol a rhoi i iechyd i bob pwrpas, ac mae Lloegr yn dioddef effeithiau hynny erbyn hyn. Roeddem ni o'r farn erioed bod yn rhaid i iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol gael eu hystyried fel un a bod y naill wedi ei gysylltu'n gryf â'r llall. Os edrychwn ni, er enghraifft, ychydig y tu hwnt i hynny at y Bil Anghenion Dysgu Ychwanegol a'r Tribiwnlys Addysg (Cymru); mae hwnnw'n ystyried dod â'r ddarpariaeth addysg ac iechyd ar gyfer pobl ifanc ynghyd hefyd. Felly, rydym ni wedi sicrhau, pan ddaw i wariant, bod gwariant yng Nghymru yn uwch fesul pen nag yn Lloegr ar iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol i wneud yn siŵr nad ydym yn siomi ein pobl fel y mae'r Llywodraeth wedi ei wneud yn Lloegr.
English: There are many benefits to schools using cashless systems: helping schools meet the requirement to protect the identity of learners, for example, who receive free school meals, and preventing the situation arising of children losing their lunch money.
Welsh: Ceir llawer o fanteision i ysgolion sy'n defnyddio systemau talu heb ddefnyddio arian parod: helpu ysgolion i fodloni'r gofyniad i ddiogelu manylion adnabod dysgwyr, er enghraifft, sy'n derbyn prydau ysgol am ddim, ac atal y sefyllfa o blant yn colli eu harian cinio rhag codi.
English: There is, of course, evidence of a link between cashless payment systems and better take-up of free school meals, and that's why I've supported and campaigned for their introduction in every school in Wales. Powys has done that and I think that's absolutely fantastic, but we now have a situation whereby children whose parents pay for lunch and who haven't topped up their cards will no longer be able to get any food. I understand the council's position in this, but it can't be right, in my view, that a child will go hungry in school because someone, somewhere along the line, has forgotten or cannot afford to pay for the dinner money that particular week. I'm particularly concerned that this is sorted out before the introduction of universal credit, which is going to happen in Powys in June. We all know about the delays in people getting their money and I'm really, really concerned that, in this system, that could cause an absolute failure for those people expecting that money to be in place and their children to be fed, which will not happen. I therefore respectfully ask you, First Minister, if you could have a word with your two Cabinet Secretaries to try and sort this out. There's an urgency that it's done before June.
Welsh: Ceir tystiolaeth, wrth gwrs, bod cysylltiad rhwng systemau talu heb ddefnyddio arian parod a niferoedd uwch yn manteisio ar brydau ysgol am ddim, a dyna pam yr wyf i wedi cefnogi ac ymgyrchu dros eu cyflwyno ym mhob ysgol yng Nghymru. Mae Powys wedi gwneud hynny, ac rwy'n credu bod hynny'n gwbl wych, ond mae gennym ni sefyllfa nawr lle na fydd plant y mae eu rhieni yn talu am ginio ac nad ydynt wedi ychwanegu arian at eu cardiau yn gallu cael unrhyw fwyd mwyach. Rwy'n deall safbwynt y Cyngor yn hyn o beth, ond ni all fod yn iawn, yn fy marn i, bod plentyn yn llwgu yn yr ysgol oherwydd bod rhywun, rywbryd wedi anghofio neu ddim yn gallu fforddio talu am yr arian cinio yr wythnos benodol honno. Rwy'n arbennig o awyddus i hyn gael ei ddatrys cyn cyflwyno credyd cynhwysol, sy'n mynd i ddigwydd ym Mhowys ym mis Mehefin. Rydym ni i gyd yn gwybod am yr oedi y mae pobl yn ei ddioddef cyn cael eu harian ac rwy'n bryderus dros ben y gallai olygu, yn y system hon, methiant llwyr i'r bobl hynny sy'n disgwyl i'r arian hwnnw fod ar gael ac i'w plant gael eu bwydo, ac na fydd yn digwydd. Gofynnaf gyda pharch i chi felly, Prif Weinidog, a allech chi gael gair gyda'ch dau Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet i geisio datrys hyn. Mae brys iddo gael ei wneud cyn mis Mehefin.
English: Yes. I'm more than happy to pursue that. My own son's school introduced cashless payments this term, which I have to say, saved on scrambling around for pound coins every week, which is what tended to happen in our house. The important point is this: I don't think it would be right that if there's no credit in a child's account, as it were, that that child should not have a meal as a result of that. There should be a system in place where parents are reminded in a timely fashion as to what the balance is on that account and not find out about it when the account has nothing in it. Certainly, I'll ask the Cabinet Secretary for Education to take this up and to reply to my friend and colleague in further detail. FootnoteLink
Welsh: Gallaf. Rwy'n fwy na pharod i fynd ar drywydd hynny. Cyflwynodd ysgol fy mab fy hun daliadau heb ddefnyddio arian parod y tymor hwn, ac mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud bod hynny wedi osgoi gorfod chwilota am ddarnau punt bob wythnos, sef yr hyn a oedd yn tueddu i ddigwydd yn ein tŷ ni. Y pwynt pwysig yw hwn: nid wyf i'n credu y byddai'n iawn, os nad oes unrhyw gredyd yng nghyfrif plentyn, fel petai, na ddylai'r plentyn hwnnw gael pryd o fwyd o ganlyniad i hynny. Dylai fod system ar waith lle mae rhieni yn cael eu hatgoffa yn brydlon o'r balans ar y cyfrif hwnnw ac nid dod i wybod amdano pan na fydd unrhyw beth yn y cyfrif. Yn sicr, byddaf yn gofyn i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Addysg fynd i'r afael â hyn ac ateb fy ffrind a'm cydweithiwr yn fwy manwl. FootnoteLink
English: As I understand it, First Minister, different local authorities across Wales use different payment methods, which does sometimes cause a problem when children move schools. I wonder if you believe that there is rationale in standardising payment methods across Wales.
Welsh: O'r hyn a ddeallaf, Prif Weinidog, mae gwahanol awdurdodau lleol ledled Cymru yn defnyddio gwahanol ddulliau talu, sydd weithiau'n achosi problem pan fo plant yn newid ysgol. Tybed a ydych chi'n credu bod sail resymegol i safoni dulliau talu ar draws Cymru.