English: Thank you very much, Chair. I just wanted to make a few comments on energy, specifically the interaction or lack of interaction between the ambition for renewable energy onshore and offshore. May I say, first of all, that I'm pleased to see the revised document turn its back on the idea of allowing huge wind turbines across Anglesey? In reality, the Anglesey landscape would have made it almost impossible to get planning permission for those kinds of turbines that were recommended in the first draft. Anglesey is very flat and there's a population across the island, and you shouldn't be building these 250m wind turbines in that kind of landscape, which is higher than the highest point on Anglesey. So, common sense seems to have prevailed there. But as a representative of an island, I spend much of my time looking out to sea and considering the potential of that marine environment, and I can't quite understand how a document that is so important, the national development framework, shouldn't include the potential for offshore energy. There are excuses being referred to as to why there is no reference to marine energy, and that it's the national marine plan that deals with that, and that the NDF is focused on terrestrial issues. But the reality is that the marine plan is very ambiguous and vague on its ambition in terms of marine energy. We can see huge potential off Anglesey with Morlais and Minesto and also further wind energy developments to the west of the current developments off the northern coast. The national development framework does specifically mention creating 70 per cent of our electricity from renewable sources. All well and good, but if we're only looking at onshore, then what about marine energy? If we had your onshore and offshore teams talking to each other, then surely we could create 100 per cent of our electricity from renewable sources, and our seas would produce most of that energy. There are very specific reasons why this is important in my constituency. We've heard mention of Wylfa and the fact that that development has been paused. I want to see - and it makes sense - offshore wind energy developments off the coast of north Wales, to the west of the current ones, are served from the port of Holyhead, rather than Mostyn, which has done very well in serving the other windfarms. The development framework needs to be very specific in saying, 'Right, there are marine wind energy developments here that could bring us real benefits onshore in areas such as Anglesey'. So, speak to each other, both teams, the onshore and the offshore. We could get a better framework for the future in doing so.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Gadeirydd. Eisiau gwneud ambell sylw am ynni ydw i, yn benodol y rhyngweithio neu'r diffyg rhyngweithio rhwng uchelgais cynhyrchu ynni adnewyddol ar y tir ac ar y môr. Gaf i ddweud, yn gyntaf, fy mod i'n falch o weld y ddogfen ddiwygiedig yma'n troi cefn ar y syniad o ganiatáu tyrbinau gwynt enfawr ar draws Ynys Môn? Mewn gwirionedd, mi fyddai tirwedd Môn wedi'i gwneud hi'n amhosibl bron i gael caniatâd cynllunio ar gyfer y math yna o dyrbinau a oedd yn cael eu hargymell yn y drafft cyntaf. Mae Ynys Môn yn wastad ac mae yna bobl yn byw ar ei hyd o i gyd, ac nid ar dirwedd wastad yng nghanol pobl a phentrefi mae adeiladu tyrbinau 250m o uchder, sy'n uwch na Mynydd Twr yng Nghaergybi, y pwynt uchaf ar yr ynys. Felly, synnwyr cyffredin wedi'i weld yn y fan yna. Ond fel cynrychiolydd ynys, dwi'n treulio llawer o amser yn edrych allan i'r môr ac yn ystyried potensial hwnnw, a dwi'n methu cweit deall sut y gall dogfen sydd mor bwysig â hon, y fframwaith datblygu cenedlaethol, beidio â chynnwys ynddi hi potensial ynni oddi ar y môr. Mae yna esgusodion yn cael eu gosod o ran pam bod yna ddim cyfeiriad at ynni môr, ac mai mewn difrif y cynllun morol cenedlaethol sydd yn gwneud hynny, ac mai'r tir ydy ffocws y cynllun datblygu cenedlaethol. Ond y gwir amdani yw bod y cynllun morol yn amwys iawn ynglŷn â'i uchelgais ar gyfer ynni môr. Rydyn ni'n gweld potensial enfawr oddi ar Ynys Môn yng nghynllun Morlais, Minesto a hefyd datblygiadau ynni gwynt pellach, mawr i'r gorllewin o'r datblygiadau presennol oddi ar arfordir y gogledd. Mae'r fframwaith cenedlaethol yn benodol yn sôn, er enghraifft, am allu creu 70 y cant o'n trydan ni o ddulliau adnewyddol. Iawn, ond os mai dim ond edrych ar y tir mae'r fframwaith datblygu, beth am yr ynni ar y môr? Petasai'r ddwy ochr, eich timau tir chi a'ch timau môr chi, yn siarad efo'i gilydd, siawns y gallwn ni ddweud y byddwn ni'n gallu creu 100 y cant o'n trydan ni o ffynonellau adnewyddol, a'r môr fyddai'n cynhyrchu y rhan fwyaf o hwnnw. Mae yna resymau penodol iawn pam fod hyn yn bwysig yn fy etholaeth i. Rydyn ni wedi clywed cyfeiriad at Wylfa a'r stop ar y cynllun hwnnw. Dwi eisiau gweld - ac mae hi'n gwneud synnwyr llwyr - datblygiadau ynni gwynt y môr newydd oddi ar arfordir gogledd Cymru, i'r gorllewin o'r rhai presennol, yn cael eu gwasanaethu o borthladd Caergybi, yn hytrach na phorthladd Mostyn, sydd wedi gwneud yn dda iawn yn gwasanaethu'r ffermydd gwynt eraill. Mae angen i'r fframwaith datblygu yma fod yn benodol iawn ynglŷn â dweud, 'Reit, mae yna ddatblygiadau gwynt y môr yn fan hyn allai wirioneddol ddod â budd i ni ar y tir mewn lle fel Ynys Môn'. Felly, siaradwch efo'ch gilydd, y ddau dîm sydd yn edrych ar y môr a'r tir. Mi allwn ni gael gwell fframwaith ar gyfer y dyfodol o wneud hynny.