English: I thank the Member for the supplementary question, and when he reads my speech he will see rather detailed views of my own thinking on the issue of legal jurisdiction and, of course, the transitional compromise that I think was put forward, which was, at this time, a distinct jurisdiction would make very much sense and do a lot to resolve the contradictions that exist. I think the Member will have heard me say previously my concerns about this sort of mythology that's developed around the concept of jurisdiction, as though it's anything other than an administration. In the past, when there was only one legislature within England and Wales, it made sense to have a single jurisdiction. We now have two legislatures. I think I will give you advance notice of my speech, for when you take the opportunity to read it - I think it is an inevitability that we will move towards a distinct jurisdiction and, eventually, a separate jurisdiction. The Member will also, I'm sure, have read with interest the comments that have been made in the House of Lords's recent report on the Wales Bill and the comments that are made there, which I think are very important, because not only do they make a number of comments about the list of reservations being so extensive and the legal test that governs the Assembly's powers being so complex and vague that they'd be a recipe for confusion and legal uncertainty, but the key point they really make, and that jumped out at me, was when they say that the committee notes there is 'no evidence of a clear rationale'. I think that is the fundamental problem. That permeates through the Wales Bill, not only in terms of the list of reservations, which is 35 pages, 195 items, but also in the thinking around the concept of how you administer an area where you have two legislatures and how you ensure that that is efficient and complementary to not only the Welsh legislature, but also the English legislature.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn atodol, a phan fydd yn darllen fy araith fe wêl safbwyntiau go fanwl o fy meddwl fy hun ar fater awdurdodaeth gyfreithiol ac wrth gwrs, y cyfaddawd trosiannol a gyflwynwyd rwy'n meddwl, sef, ar hyn o bryd, y byddai awdurdodaeth benodol yn gwneud llawer iawn o synnwyr ac yn gwneud llawer i ddatrys yr anghysondebau sy'n bodoli. Rwy'n credu y bydd yr Aelod wedi fy nghlywed yn dweud o'r blaen am fy mhryderon ynglŷn â'r math hwn o fytholeg sydd wedi datblygu ynglŷn â'r syniad o awdurdodaeth, fel pe bai'n rhywbeth ar wahân i weinyddiaeth. Yn y gorffennol, pan oedd ond un ddeddfwrfa yng Nghymru a Lloegr, roedd yn gwneud synnwyr i gael un awdurdodaeth. Erbyn hyn mae gennym ddwy ddeddfwrfa. Rwy'n credu fy mod am roi rhybudd ymlaen llaw i chi ynglŷn â fy araith, ar gyfer pan fyddwch yn manteisio ar y cyfle i'w darllen - credaf ei bod yn anochel y byddwn yn symud tuag at awdurdodaeth benodol ac yn y pen draw, awdurdodaeth ar wahân. Rwy'n siŵr y bydd yr Aelod hefyd wedi darllen gyda diddordeb y sylwadau a wnaed yn adroddiad diweddar Tŷ'r Arglwyddi ar Fil Cymru a'r sylwadau sy'n cael eu gwneud yno, a chredaf eu bod yn bwysig iawn, oherwydd nid yn unig eu bod yn gwneud nifer o sylwadau ynglŷn â bod y rhestr o gymalau cadw yn rhy helaeth a bod y prawf cyfreithiol sy'n llywodraethu pwerau'r Cynulliad mor gymhleth ac amwys fel ei fod yn rysáit ar gyfer dryswch ac ansicrwydd cyfreithiol, ond y pwynt allweddol y maent yn ei wneud mewn gwirionedd, a bachodd hynny fy sylw, oedd pan ddywedant fod y pwyllgor yn nodi nad oes unrhyw dystiolaeth o resymeg glir. Credaf mai dyna'r broblem sylfaenol. Mae'n treiddio trwy Fil Cymru, nid yn unig o ran y rhestr o gymalau cadw, sy'n 35 tudalen, 195 o eitemau, ond hefyd o ran y ffordd o feddwl am y cysyniad o sut rydych yn gweinyddu ardal lle y mae gennych ddwy ddeddfwrfa a sut rydych yn sicrhau bod hynny'n effeithlon ac yn gyflenwol nid yn unig i'r ddeddfwrfa Gymreig, ond hefyd i'r ddeddfwrfa Seisnig.