English: Thank you for that contribution. Just to start off with the affordable homes target, I would just like to assure the Member that we will reach the 20,000 affordable homes target in this Assembly term. What this is about, though, is saying that that's not enough and that we need to build an awful lot more, if we possibly can, and about making sure that we start to build at scale and pace. It was not possible to do this when we set that target, because we still had the housing cap for the housing revenue accounts in local authorities. I'm going to choose my words carefully, Deputy Llywydd: I think that I've had the privilege - I think I'm going to use that word - of looking at the draft housing revenue account guidance most recently. I have to say, it's an arcane art, the housing revenue account, and so the guidance was - I think it's fair to say it was detailed. So, I'm looking forward to feedback from treasurers around Wales about how they respond to our new guidance. The new guidance is designed to maximise the flexibility in housing revenue accounts to accelerate the pace by which local authorities in particular can build new council houses as they release funds in order to do that. And I answered in response to Dawn Bowden the issue around bringing public sector land forward in order to be able to do that as well. In terms of housing need and demand, I'm accepting the independent panel's recommendation in terms of housing need. They rightly point out that there's much more consistency at local level, and that the information can be more granular and better linked to the planning process in that regard. We also accept the importance of Welsh Government gathering the information from authorities and analysing the responses ourselves. I don't want to introduce those changes quickly, however, because it's possible to destabilise the system if we do that. We want to take time in partnership to look exactly at how those changes should be implemented, although I'm being very clear that we are changing the system; we just want to work through with partners exactly how the system will look afterwards. And, as I said in response to Leanne Wood, it's important to get whole stages of the plan in place at national, strategic and local level while we work through the changes to do that. But I'm very clear that we do need to have those changes. In terms of downsizing from the family home, I think it's absolutely right that we are not building sufficient units of single bedroom or one and a half bedroom size. But I don't want people to be beguiled by the idea that we think all families should move out of their home. People have grandchildren and they have the need to have family gatherings and so on. It's not always optimal to move out of a big house. So, what we want to do is ensure that people live in a house that suits them and that they are not forced out of any family home if they don't want to be so. And I don't think the bedroom tax has been anything other than the most appalling instrument of, well, just misery for people. So, I don't want to be associated with anything that sounds remotely like that. However, I will accept I think the point the Member was making that we need to build more smaller units for people who do want to downsize, and we are certainly looking at the mix of units in there. In terms of the decarbonisation points she made, I'm not going to respond. The temptation to respond is overwhelming, but I'm going to resist it, because I will be waiting for the decarbonisation report to come forward. It is being announced next Thursday, so I'll look forward to responding to that in due course.
Welsh: Diolch ichi am y cyfraniad yna. Gan ddechrau gyda'r targed ar gyfer tai fforddiadwy, hoffwn sicrhau'r Aelod y byddwn yn cyrraedd y targed o 20,000 o dai fforddiadwy yn nhymor y Cynulliad hwn. Mae a wnelo hyn, fodd bynnag, â dweud nad yw hynny'n ddigon a bod angen i ni adeiladu llawer iawn mwy, os oes modd, a sicrhau ein bod yn dechrau adeiladu ar raddfa fwy ac ar garlam. Nid oedd yn bosibl gwneud hyn pan oeddem yn gosod y targed hwnnw, oherwydd roedd y cap tai ar gyfer cyfrifon refeniw tai yn dal i fodoli mewn awdurdodau lleol. Rwy'n mynd i ddewis fy ngeiriau'n ofalus, Dirprwy Lywydd: rwy'n credu fy mod wedi cael y fraint - rwy'n credu fy mod yn mynd i ddefnyddio'r gair hwnnw - o edrych ar y canllawiau drafft ar gyfer y cyfrif refeniw tai yn ddiweddar iawn. Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, mae'n gelfyddyd gyfrin, y cyfrif refeniw tai, ac felly roedd y canllawiau - rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n deg dweud eu bod yn fanwl. Felly, rwy'n edrych ymlaen at gael adborth gan drysoryddion ledled Cymru ynghylch sut y maen nhw'n ymateb i'n canllawiau newydd. Mae'r canllawiau newydd wedi'u cynllunio i fanteisio i'r eithaf ar hyblygrwydd mewn cyfrifon refeniw tai i alluogi awdurdodau lleol yn benodol i gyflymu'r broses o adeiladu tai cyngor newydd wrth iddyn nhw ryddhau arian er mwyn gwneud hynny. Ac atebais mewn ymateb i Dawn Bowden ynghylch y mater yn ymwneud â chyflwyno tir y sector cyhoeddus er mwyn gallu gwneud hynny hefyd. O ran yr angen a'r galw am dai, rwy'n derbyn argymhelliad y panel annibynnol o ran yr angen am dai. Maen nhw'n gywir i nodi bod llawer mwy o gysondeb ar lefel leol, ac y gall yr wybodaeth fod yn fwy manwl ac wedi ei chysylltu'n well â'r broses gynllunio yn hynny o beth. Rydym ni hefyd yn derbyn ei bod hi'n bwysig i Lywodraeth Cymru gasglu'r wybodaeth gan awdurdodau a dadansoddi'r ymatebion ein hunain. Nid wyf eisiau cyflwyno'r newidiadau hynny'n gyflym, fodd bynnag, oherwydd ei bod hi'n bosib ansefydlogi'r system os gwnawn ni hynny. Rydym ni eisiau cymryd amser mewn partneriaeth i edrych yn union ar sut y dylid rhoi'r newidiadau hynny ar waith, er fy mod yn dweud yn glir iawn ein bod ni'n newid y system; y cyfan yr ydym ni eisiau ei wneud yw edrych ar hyn gyda'n partneriaid i ganfod beth yn union fydd ffurf y system wedyn. Ac, fel y dywedais mewn ymateb i Leanne Wood, mae'n bwysig cael camau cyfan y cynllun yn eu lle ar lefel genedlaethol, strategol a lleol wrth i ni weithio drwy'r newidiadau i wneud hynny. Ond rwy'n glir iawn bod angen i ni gael y newidiadau hynny. O ran symud i gartref llai o faint, rwy'n credu ei bod yn hollol gywir nad ydym yn adeiladu digon o unedau o faint ystafell wely sengl neu un ystafell wely a hanner. Ond nid wyf eisiau i bobl gael eu twyllo gan y syniad ein bod ni'n credu y dylai pob teulu symud o'u cartref. Mae gan bobl wyrion ac wyresau ac maen nhw'n dymuno dod at ei gilydd fel teulu ac ati. Nid yw hi wastad yn ddelfrydol symud o dŷ mawr. Felly, yr hyn yr ydym ni eisiau ei wneud yw sicrhau bod pobl yn byw mewn tŷ sy'n addas iddyn nhw ac nad ydyn nhw'n cael eu gorfodi i symud o unrhyw gartref teuluol os nad ydyn nhw'n dymuno hynny. Ac nid wyf yn credu bod y dreth ystafell wely wedi bod yn ddim byd heblaw modd gwarthus sy'n, wel, yn fwrn ar bobl. Felly, nid wyf eisiau bod yn gysylltiedig ag unrhyw beth sy'n ymdebygu mewn unrhyw ffordd i hynny. Fodd bynnag, derbyniaf, rwy'n credu, y pwynt yr oedd yr Aelod yn ei wneud sef bod angen inni adeiladu mwy o unedau llai ar gyfer pobl sydd eisiau symud i gartref llai o faint, ac rydym yn sicr yn edrych ar y cyfuniad o unedau yn hynny o beth. O ran y pwyntiau am ddatgarboneiddio a wnaeth hi, nid wyf am ymateb. Mae'r demtasiwn i ymateb yn llethol, ond rwy'n mynd i'w wrthsefyll, oherwydd byddaf yn disgwyl i'r adroddiad ar ddatgarboneiddio gael ei gyflwyno. Mae'n cael ei gyhoeddi ddydd Iau nesaf, felly edrychaf ymlaen at ymateb i hwnnw maes o law.