English: I thank Simon Thomas for a very long list of questions, which I will endeavour to cover. Again, you raised a similar point to David Melding about the 100 per cent target. I look very carefully at targets and, as I say, we did take expert advice, but I don't think the grid would support a 100 per cent target at the moment. I don't think the current UK Government energy market mechanisms would support that at the moment. We are connected to a global energy system, and I just don't think at the current time it would be the right thing to do. But it's like any target - and I hear what you say about Plaid Cymru's target was for 100 per cent by 2035. Well, who knows? From 2030 to 2035, we could make it. It's like our recycling targets: we're there already, we're there two years beforehand, so I'm looking at whether we should be changing that target. So, obviously, we can certainly keep it under review. You referred to the work that we're doing with community energy and local ownership. We've got over 330 MW of renewable generation capacity owned by our communities and locally-owned organisations. So, that's a significant amount, and it's a good amount to build on. You'll be aware that our local energy service currently works closely with 34 different groups across Wales at the current time, and we are supporting a further two at the moment, which are due to be completed by the end of this year. I think that will take us up, then, to about 17. So, as I say, I will be consulting later in the year. Simon Thomas referred to the possibility of an energy company for Wales, which was an idea that you and I met over, and we certainly took it forward. I did make a written statement last month, indicating that we do not believe a strong enough case was made for establishing an umbrella supply company for Wales. Again, we collected evidence and views about the potential for energy services companies. We held a series of consultations back in March, and that really created a very clear consensus, I think, around the risks and the challenges and the tensions that would be inherent if we did set up and run an energy supply company. I think many people - and I know I've discussed this with Simon - felt that the Government had a sort of trusted neutral voice, if you like, and that could be lost if we then did participate in the market. So, the conclusion was that the risks of creating a Welsh Government supply company could heavily outweigh the potential benefits. Have we closed the door? No, of course not. We will always listen to views. So, maybe it is something that we consider looking at, at a future date. You raised grid flexibility. Clearly, we need a modern, efficient, reliable energy infrastructure, and that has to be alongside a very robust and fit-for-purpose grid, and that grid has to enable our low-carbon energy objectives to be delivered. So, we are engaging with National Grid - I've met National Grid; I know the First Minister's met the chief executive of National Grid - to make sure that their delivery plans include a grid that's absolutely fit for purpose for what we want to do in Wales. You mentioned about heat, and I think I gave the reasons why we didn't choose to include heat. But you're right; we need to have that development of that policy forward. It's so important if we are going to reach our decarbonisation targets. So, that will be policy that we are developing. The point you mentioned about onshore wind on farms - I have seen a couple of farms where farmers have diversified already. But you're quite right; Brexit has, I think, made diversification that much more of an issue being discussed by farmers, and I think we will see more of that going forward. In relation to the Hendry review, you will have heard my earlier answer to David Melding. It's very important we get a response as quickly as possible. They really are dragging their heels now, and we do need to know what they're doing. But, certainly, we remain supportive of that principle, but it's for UK Government to trigger the green light, not us. And you mentioned the funding that Ken Skates announced, I think it was yesterday, on Anglesey, which I agree is very welcome.
Welsh: Diolch i Simon Thomas am restr hir iawn o gwestiynau. Byddaf yn ymdrechu i ymdrin â nhw. Unwaith eto, fe wnaethoch godi pwynt tebyg i David Melding am y targed o 100 y cant. Rwy'n edrych yn ofalus iawn ar dargedau ac, fel y dywedais, fe wnaethon ni gymryd cyngor arbenigol. Ond ni chredaf y byddai'r grid yn cefnogi targed o 100 y cant ar hyn o bryd. Ni chredaf y byddai mecanweithiau marchnad ynni presennol Llywodraeth y DU yn cefnogi hynny ar hyn o bryd. Rydym wedi'n cysylltu â system ynni fyd-eang, ac nid wyf yn credu ar hyn o bryd mai dyna'r peth iawn i'w wneud. Ond mae'n debyg i unrhyw darged - a chlywais yr hyn a ddywedwch am darged Plaid Cymru yn 100 y cant erbyn 2035. Wel, pwy a ŵyr? O 2030 i 2035, gallem ei gyflawni. Mae'n debyg i'n targedau ailgylchu: rydym yno eisoes, rydym yno ddwy flynedd ymlaen llaw, felly rwy'n ystyried a ddylem ni fod yn newid y targed hwnnw. Felly, yn amlwg, gallwn yn sicr ei gadw dan adolygiad. Cyfeiriasoch at y gwaith yr ydym yn ei wneud gydag ynni cymunedol a pherchenogaeth leol. Mae gennym dros 330 MW o gapasiti cynhyrchu adnewyddadwy sy'n eiddo i'n cymunedau a sefydliadau sy'n eiddo yn lleol. Felly, mae hynny'n swm sylweddol, ac mae'n swm da i adeiladu arno. Byddwch yn ymwybodol fod ein gwasanaeth ynni lleol ar hyn o bryd yn cydweithio'n agos â 34 o wahanol grwpiau ledled Cymru, ac rydym yn cefnogi dau arall ar hyn o bryd, sydd i'w cwblhau erbyn diwedd y flwyddyn hon. Rwy'n credu y bydd hynny'n mynd â ni i fyny, wedyn, i tua 17. Felly, fel y dywedais, byddaf yn ymgynghori yn hwyrach yn y flwyddyn. Cyfeiriodd Simon Thomas at y posibilrwydd o gwmni ynni i Gymru, a oedd yn syniad y gwnaethoch chi a minnau gyfarfod yn ei gylch, ac yn sicr fe wnaethom ei ddatblygu. Gwneuthum ddatganiad ysgrifenedig y mis diwethaf, gan nodi nad ydym yn credu bod achos digon cryf wedi'i wneud i sefydlu cwmni cyflenwad ymbarél i Gymru. Unwaith eto, casglwyd tystiolaeth a barn am y potensial ar gyfer cwmnïau gwasanaethau ynni. Cynhaliwyd cyfres o ymgynghoriadau gennym ym mis Mawrth, a chreodd hynny gonsensws clir iawn, yn fy marn i, am y risgiau a'r heriau a'r tensiynau a fyddai'n gynhenid os ydym yn sefydlu a rhedeg cwmni cyflenwi ynni. Rwy'n credu bod llawer o bobl - a gwn fy mod wedi trafod hyn gyda Simon - yn credu bod gan y Llywodraeth ryw fath o lais niwtral dibynadwy, os dymunwch, a gellid colli hynny pe baem ni wedyn yn cymryd rhan yn y farchnad. Felly, y casgliad oedd y gallai'r risgiau o greu cwmni cyflenwi Llywodraeth Cymru fod yn drech o lawer na'r manteision posibl. Ydyn ni wedi cau'r drws? Nac ydym, wrth gwrs. Byddwn bob amser yn gwrando ar farn pobl. Felly, efallai ei fod yn rhywbeth yr ydym yn ystyried edrych arno, yn y dyfodol. Rydych wedi codi hyblygrwydd grid. Yn amlwg, mae arnom angen seilwaith ynni modern, effeithlon, dibynadwy, ac mae'n rhaid iddo fod ochr yn ochr â grid cadarn a phwrpasol, ac mae'n rhaid i'r grid allu darparu ein hamcanion ynni carbon isel. Felly, rydym yn ymgysylltu â'r Grid Cenedlaethol - rwyf wedi cwrdd â'r Grid Cenedlaethol; gwn fod Prif Weinidog Cymru wedi cwrdd â phrif weithredwr y Grid Cenedlaethol - i sicrhau bod eu cynlluniau cyflawni yn cynnwys grid sy'n gwbl addas i'r diben ar gyfer yr hyn yr ydym am ei wneud yng Nghymru. Soniasoch am wres, a chredaf fy mod wedi rhoi'r rhesymau pam na wnaethom ddewis cynnwys gwres. Ond rydych chi'n iawn; mae angen i ni ddatblygu'r polisi hwnnw. Mae'n bwysig iawn os ydym am gyrraedd ein targedau datgarboneiddio. Felly, bydd hwnnw'n bolisi yr ydym yn ei ddatblygu. Y pwynt a grybwyllwyd gennych am wynt ar y tir ar ffermydd - rwyf wedi gweld cwpl o ffermydd lle mae ffermwyr wedi arallgyfeirio eisoes. Ond rydych chi'n hollol iawn; mae Brexit, rwy'n credu, wedi gwneud arallgyfeirio yn llawer mwy o bwnc sy'n cael ei drafod gan ffermwyr, a chredaf y byddwn yn gweld mwy o hynny wrth fynd ymlaen. Mewn cysylltiad ag adolygiad Hendry, byddwch wedi clywed fy ateb yn gynharach i David Melding. Mae'n bwysig iawn ein bod yn cael ymateb cyn gynted â phosib. Maent yn wir yn llusgo'u sodlau nawr, ac mae angen i ni wybod beth maen nhw'n ei wneud. Ond, yn sicr, rydym yn parhau i fod yn gefnogol i'r egwyddor honno, ond mater i Lywodraeth y DU yw sbarduno'r golau gwyrdd, nid y ni. Soniasoch am y cyllid a gyhoeddodd Ken Skates, rwy'n credu mai ddoe oedd hynny, ar Ynys Môn. Cytunaf ei fod yn dderbyniol iawn.