English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer, and thank you also to the Cabinet Secretary for the statement. This is an area that is a priority for us, and that's why we were determined to see a commitment in this area in terms of the post-election agreement. However, we are facing a crisis and, in the face of a crisis of this kind, we need to act as a matter of urgency. There are fewer GPs per head in Wales than in the rest of the UK. Secondly, the calls and pressure on them is increasing. So, it's entirely clear that the situation that we're facing at present isn't sustainable. So, I welcome several aspects of the statement, but there are several things that are insufficient, unclear or missing from the statement. So, I will ask four questions. The Cabinet Secretary has talked about an incentives system for some posts. I take it that that will be in areas where recruitment is difficult. Will the Cabinet Secretary confirm that that will include incentives for service over a longer period of time rather than just short-term incentives to fill posts in the short term? It's very important that we do look at the longer term. There are some long-term elements that are perhaps not included here. There's no mention here of recruitment of students from within Wales to study medicine in the first instance, nor is there mention made of recruitment of school pupils to want to pursue a career as a GP - which is something that I have an interest in - and to study medicine with that view from the very beginning of going into primary care work. I wonder whether the Cabinet Secretary is willing to look into work that can be done in that particular area. The third question from me: the First Minister said in an interview on the radio this morning, when referring to the number of GP practices that have been put back into the hands of health boards, that that wasn't necessarily a bad thing. Does that mean that aiming towards having more GP practices managed directly by health boards is something that you would want to pursue, and even that that could become something that the Government would favour from now on? Finally - and this is entirely crucial - may I ask what targets the Cabinet Secretary is willing to set for the number of additional GPs that he wants to have, or the number of GPs that we will have in Wales by 2021? If you consider: technically, having one new part-time GP would mean expanding the provision of GPs. But, what is the target that the Cabinet Secretary has in mind? The Royal College of GPs, for example, has said that we need 400 new GPs in Wales. Is there any reason in the Cabinet Secretary's mind as to why that figure wouldn't be an appropriate target?
Welsh: Diolch, Ddirprwy Lywydd, a diolch i'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet am y datganiad. Mae hwn yn faes sy'n sicr yn flaenoriaeth i ni ym Mhlaid Cymru, a dyna pam, wrth gwrs, yr oeddem ni'n benderfynol o gael ymrwymiad yn y maes yma yn rhan o'r cytundeb ôl-etholiadol. Mi ydym ni'n wynebu argyfwng ac, yn wyneb argyfwng o'r math yma, mae angen gweithredu brys. Mae yna lai o feddygon teulu y pen yng Nghymru nag yng ngwledydd eraill y Deyrnas Unedig. Ac, yn ail, mae'r galw arnyn nhw yn cynyddu. Felly, mae hi'n eithaf clir nad ydy'r sefyllfa sydd gennym ni ar hyn o bryd yn gynaliadwy. Rwy'n croesawu sawl elfen o'r datganiad ond, mae yna sawl peth, rydw i'n meddwl, yn annigonol, yn aneglur, neu ar goll o'r datganiad. Felly, mi ofynnaf bedwar o gwestiynau. Mae'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet wedi sôn am system gymell i rai swyddi. Rydw i'n cymryd mai mewn ardaloedd lle mae recriwtio yn anodd y byddai hynny. A wnaiff yr Ysgrifennydd Cabinet gadarnhau y byddai hynny'n cynnwys cymhellion i wasanaethu dros amser yn hytrach na dim ond cymhellion byr dymor i lenwi swyddi byr dymor? Mae'n bwysig iawn ein bod ni'n edrych yn hirdymor, wrth gwrs. Mae yna ambell i elfen hirdymor, o bosibl, sydd ddim yma. Nid oes sôn am recriwtio myfyrwyr o Gymru i astudio meddygaeth yn y lle cyntaf. Nid oes yna chwaith sôn am recriwtio myfyrwyr ysgol i fod eisiau dilyn gyrfa fel meddyg teulu - rhywbeth y mae gennyf ddiddordeb ynddo - ac i fynd i astudio meddygaeth efo'r golwg o'r cychwyn, os liciwch chi, i fynd i mewn i ofal sylfaenol. Tybed a ydy'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet yn fodlon ymchwilio i waith a allai gael ei wneud yn y maes yna. Y trydydd cwestiwn gennyf i: mi ddywedodd y Prif Weinidog mewn cyfweliad ar y radio y bore yma, wrth gyfeirio at niferoedd y meddygfeydd teulu sydd wedi cael eu rhoi yn ôl yn nwylo'r byrddau iechyd, nad oedd hynny, yn angenrheidiol, yn ddrwg o beth. A ydy hynny'n golygu bod anelu at gael rhagor o feddygfeydd wedi'u rheoli'n uniongyrchol gan fyrddau iechyd yn rhywbeth y byddech chi'n dymuno mynd ar ei ôl, a hyd yn oed yn dod yn rhywbeth y byddech chi fel Llywodraeth yn ei ffafrio o hyn ymlaen? Ac yn olaf - mae hyn yn gwbl hanfodol - a gaf i ofyn pa darged y mae'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet yn fodlon ei osod ar gyfer nifer y meddygon teulu ychwanegol y mae o eisiau eu cael, neu niferoedd y meddygon teulu y bydd gennym yng Nghymru erbyn 2021? Os ystyriwch chi: yn dechnegol, byddai cael un meddyg teulu rhan-amser newydd yn golygu ehangu'r ddarpariaeth o feddygon teulu. Ond, beth yw'r targed sydd gan yr Ysgrifennydd Cabinet yn ei feddwl o? Mae Coleg Brenhinol y Meddygon Teulu, er enghraifft, wedi dweud ein bod ni angen 400 o feddygon teulu ychwanegol yng Nghymru. A oes unrhyw reswm ym meddwl yr Ysgrifennydd Cabinet pam na fyddai'r ffigur hwnnw'n darged priodol?