English: Let's be clear: Cwm Taf was already struggling. There were reports from Healthcare Inspectorate Wales in 2015, which raised concerns about the quality of patient experience, the delivery of safe and effective care, and the quality of management and leadership. There was a report by the workforce and organisational development team in 2016, which identified significant issues, including the perception of a blame culture and a lack of time. There was a 2017 Wales Deanery visit that highlighted six areas of concern. There was a 2018 General Medical Council survey, which highlighted concerns, a 2018 Healthcare Inspectorate Wales report, which highlighted concerns, a 2018 internal report by the associate medical director, which produced a governance review and an implementation plan that wasn't implemented. May to September 2018 saw three deep dives into reported and unreported incidents on Datix, including the discovery of all those stillborn deaths, a September 2018 internal report by a consultant midwife that was ignored, a 2018 report by the Human Tissue Authority, which identified concerns in a number of areas throughout the health board, including maternity services. And a 2018 report by the Wales Audit Office, raising concerns over quality and governance arrangements. Minister, you did not sign off on the IMTPs of Hywel Dda University Health Board, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, or Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board. So, can you explain to us what was so different about Cwm Taf that, despite all the foregoing, you felt you could agree their IMTP?
Welsh: Gadewch inni fod yn glir: roedd bwrdd Cwm Taf eisoes yn ei chael hi'n anodd. Cafwyd adroddiadau gan Arolygiaeth Gofal Iechyd Cymru yn 2015, a gododd bryderon ynghylch ansawdd profiad y claf, darpariaeth gofal diogel ac effeithiol, ac ansawdd rheoli ac arwain. Cafwyd adroddiad gan dîm y gweithlu a datblygu sefydliadol yn 2016, a nododd faterion sylweddol, gan gynnwys y canfyddiad o ddiwylliant bwrw bai a diffyg amser. Cafwyd ymweliad gan Ddeoniaeth Cymru yn 2017, a amlygodd chwe maes pryder. Cafwyd arolwg gan y Cyngor Meddygol Cyffredinol yn 2018, a amlygodd bryderon, adroddiad gan Arolygiaeth Gofal Iechyd Cymru yn 2018, a amlygodd bryderon, adroddiad mewnol yn 2018 gan y cyfarwyddwr meddygol cyswllt, a arweiniodd at adolygiad llywodraethu a chynllun gweithredu na chafodd ei weithredu. Rhwng mis Mai a mis Medi 2018, cafwyd tri adroddiad at wraidd digwyddiadau a gofnodwyd ac na chofnodwyd ar Datix, gan gynnwys darganfod yr holl farwolaethau marwanedig hynny, adroddiad mewnol ym mis Medi 2018 gan fydwraig ymgynghorol a anwybyddwyd, adroddiad yn 2018 gan yr Awdurdod Meinweoedd Dynol, a nododd bryderon mewn nifer o feysydd ym mhob rhan o'r bwrdd iechyd, gan gynnwys gwasanaethau mamolaeth. Ac adroddiad yn 2018 gan Swyddfa Archwilio Cymru, a gododd bryderon ynghylch ansawdd a threfniadau llywodraethu. Weinidog, ni chymeradwyoch Gynlluniau Tymor Canolig Integredig Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Hywel Dda, Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Betsi Cadwaladr, na Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Abertawe Bro Morgannwg. Felly, a allwch egluro i ni beth oedd mor wahanol am fwrdd Cwm Taf fel eich bod, er gwaethaf yr holl bethau uchod, yn teimlo y gallech gymeradwyo eu cynllun tymor canolig integredig?