techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I think I just answered that question. There is no mitigation against no deal. It would not be right to say that. The reality is that, if we have a 'no deal' Brexit, we will lose jobs, and we will lose investment. There is no question about that, which is why I have fought tooth and nail against a 'no deal' Brexit. That does not mean, of course, that we are not doing anything in terms of preparing for Brexit. She'll have heard me say earlier on what we have been doing. We also have put in place, of course, the EU transition fund - £50 million that helps businesses, public services and other organisations to plan for and prepare for the impact of Brexit. So, yes, we have a number of groups where we are talking to stakeholders. We also have money on the table. But surely nobody can pretend that a 'no deal' Brexit can be fully mitigated, because it can't.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu fy mod i newydd ateb y cwestiwn yna. Nid oes unrhyw fesurau lliniaru yn erbyn dim cytundeb. Ni fyddai'n iawn i ddweud hynny. Y gwir amdani yw, os byddwn ni'n cael Brexit 'dim cytundeb', byddwn yn colli swyddi, a byddwn yn colli buddsoddiad. Nid oes unrhyw amheuaeth am hynny, a dyna pam yr wyf i wedi brwydro'n galed yn erbyn Brexit 'dim cytundeb'. Nid yw hynny'n golygu, wrth gwrs, nad ydym ni'n gwneud unrhyw beth o ran paratoi ar gyfer Brexit. Bydd hi wedi fy nghlywed i'n dweud yn gynharach yr hyn yr ydym ni wedi bod yn ei wneud. Rydym ni hefyd wedi sefydlu, wrth gwrs, cronfa bontio'r UE - £50 miliwn sy'n helpu busnesau, gwasanaethau cyhoeddus a sefydliadau eraill i gynllunio ar gyfer a pharatoi ar gyfer effaith Brexit. Felly, oes, mae gennym ni nifer o grwpiau lle'r ydym ni'n siarad â rhanddeiliaid. Mae gennym ni arian ar y bwrdd hefyd. Ond does bosib y gall neb esgus y gellir lliniaru'n llawn yn erbyn Brexit 'dim cytundeb', oherwydd ni ellir gwneud hynny.
English: First Minister, I think we can all agree that the Westminster Government is making a right mess of Brexit, and the position is so weak. Last week, Plaid Cymru - . Sorry, it wasn't Plaid Cymru that consented to Westminster's flagship Brexit Bill, was it? And it wasn't Plaid Cymru that abstained on the votes that could have kept us in the single market. And it wasn't Plaid Cymru that voted to trigger article 50 without a plan. First Minister, that was the Labour Party that did all those things - no input, and not even sight of Westminster's Brexit paper. Now, is this what the finance Secretary meant when he said that his deal with the Conservatives marked, and I quote, a 'significant step' towards 'equitable' inter-governmental working, or, in hindsight, was your Government wrong to consent to the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill, which will help to further the chaos that we're already seeing in Westminster?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, rwy'n credu y gallwn ni i gyd gytuno bod Llywodraeth San Steffan yn gwneud llanastr go iawn o Brexit, ac mae'r sefyllfa mor wan. Yr wythnos diwethaf, cydsyniodd Plaid Cymru - . Mae'n ddrwg gen i, nid Plaid Cymru wnaeth gydsynio i brif Fil Brexit San Steffan, nage? Ac nid Plaid Cymru wnaeth atal y pleidleisiau a allai fod wedi ein cadw yn y farchnad sengl. Ac nid Plaid Cymru bleidleisiodd i sbarduno erthygl 50 heb gynllun. Prif Weinidog, y Blaid Lafur wnaeth yr holl bethau hynny - dim mewnbwn, a dim golwg ar bapur Brexit San Steffan hyd yn oed. Nawr, ai dyma oedd yr Ysgrifennydd dros gyllid yn ei olygu pan ddywedodd bod y cytundeb hwn gyda'r Ceidwadwyr, a dyfynnaf, yn gam sylweddol tuag at weithio rhynglywodraethol teg, neu, o edrych yn ôl, a oedd eich Llywodraeth chi yn anghywir i roi cydsyniad i Fil yr Undeb Ewropeaidd (Ymadael), a fydd yn helpu i ychwanegu at yr anhrefn yr ydym ni eisoes yn ei weld yn San Steffan?
English: In terms of what she said about this being an important step to inter-governmental co-operation, I believe that Nicola Sturgeon, the Scottish First Minister, said the same thing. So, yes, it is an important step, but obviously there are different positions taken by the Scottish and Welsh Governments. The reality is I can't answer for what happens in Westminster; I'm the First Minister of Wales. And she will know, working with her party, we have developed what I think are the most thought-through and sensible policies of anywhere in the UK. We have worked through policies, working with her party, that provide for, yes, the delivery of the referendum result, but also a soft Brexit, a sensible trade policy, sensible relationships with the EU, full unfettered access to the single market - all these things we've shared together. We are continuing to press the UK Government. It seems, we hope, that they are listening to an extent, given that the Chequers agreement goes much further towards where we think the UK should be than has previously been the case.
Welsh: O ran yr hyn a ddywedodd am y ffaith fod hwn yn gam pwysig at gydweithredu rhynglywodraethol, rwy'n credu bod Nicola Sturgeon, Prif Weinidog yr Alban, wedi dweud yr un peth. Felly, ydy, mae'n gam pwysig, ond yn amlwg mae gan Lywodraethau'r Alban a Chymru wahanol safbwyntiau. Y gwir amdani yw na allaf i fod yn atebol am yr hyn sy'n digwydd yn San Steffan; Prif Weinidog Cymru wyf i. A bydd hi'n gwybod, gan weithio gyda'i phlaid, ein bod ni wedi datblygu'r hyn yr wyf i'n ei gredu yw'r polisïau a ystyriwyd yn fwyaf trylwyr a synhwyrol o unrhyw fan yn y DU. Rydym ni wedi gweithio trwy bolisïau, wedi gweithio gyda'i phlaid hi, sy'n darparu ar gyfer, ie, darparu canlyniad y refferendwm, ond hefyd Brexit meddal, polisi masnach synhwyrol, perthynas synhwyrol â'r UE, mynediad llawn a dilyffethair at y farchnad sengl - rydym ni wedi rhannu'r holl bethau hyn gyda'n gilydd. Rydym ni'n parhau i bwyso ar Lywodraeth y DU. Mae'n ymddangos, rydym ni'n gobeithio, eu bod nhw'n gwrando i ryw raddau, o gofio bod y cytundeb Chequers yn mynd ymhellach o lawer tuag at lle'r ydym ni'n credu y dylai'r DU fod na'r hyn a oedd yn wir yn flaenorol.
English: How can you expect the UK Government to listen to what we jointly want when you can't even get your own party to accept that position? Your MPs vote against the joint agreed position that your party and my party have agreed in this Assembly. First Minister, we face uncertainty here like we've never faced it before. With just weeks of negotiating time left, and Westminster in more chaos than ever, why do you refuse to accept reality? A 'no deal' Brexit is looming over us, and I don't think that your Government is doing anywhere near enough to protect this nation. Now, as a democrat, I believe that people should have a say on the final deal, so, First Minister, now that we know that it looks like either a bad deal or a 'no deal', will you now back a people's vote so that we can have a chance to reject the extreme Brexit that you and I know will cause so much damage to the people and the economy of this country?
Welsh: Sut gallwch chi ddisgwyl i Lywodraeth y DU wrando ar yr hyn yr ydym ni ei eisiau ar y cyd pan na allwch chi hyd yn oed gael eich plaid eich hun i dderbyn y safbwynt hwnnw? Mae eich ASau yn pleidleisio yn erbyn y safbwynt a gytunwyd ar y cyd y mae eich plaid chi a'm plaid innau wedi ei gytuno yn y Cynulliad hwn. Prif Weinidog, rydym ni'n wynebu ansicrwydd yn y fan yma fel nad ydym ni erioed wedi ei wynebu o'r blaen. Gyda dim ond wythnosau o amser trafod yn weddill, a San Steffan mewn mwy o anhrefn nag erioed, pam ydych chi'n gwrthod derbyn realiti? Mae Brexit 'dim cytundeb' ar fin ein taro, ac nid wyf i'n credu bod eich Llywodraeth yn gwneud hanner digon i amddiffyn y wlad hon. Nawr, fel democrat, rwy'n credu y dylai pobl gael lleisio eu barn ar y cytundeb terfynol, felly, Prif Weinidog, nawr ein bod ni'n gwybod ei fod yn edrych fel naill ai cytundeb gwael neu 'ddim cytundeb', a wnewch chi gefnogi pleidlais i'r bobl nawr, fel y gallwn ni gael cyfle i wrthod y Brexit eithafol yr ydych chi a minnau'n gwybod fydd yn achosi cymaint o niwed i bobl ac i economi'r wlad hon?
English: Well, my view has always been that any deal should be ratified by the Parliaments - plural - of the UK. If that doesn't happen, the matter would either have to be settled through an election or indeed, possibly, by a referendum on the deal itself. Because, if there's no other way of resolving it, then the people who voted in 2016 have a perfect right to decide what kind of deal they want to approve from 2018 onwards. It seems right that that should happen. But it seems to me that the first port of call is for the Parliaments of the UK to examine any deal and decide whether that deal should be supported or not. If there is then, for example, a general election if that deal is rejected, and that produces an inconclusive result, well, how else can it be resolved other than by a referendum on the deal? I think that becomes inevitable at that stage.
Welsh: Wel, fy marn i erioed fu y dylai unrhyw gytundeb gael ei gadarnhau gan Seneddau - lluosog - y DU. Os na fydd hynny'n digwydd, byddai'n rhaid penderfynu'r mater naill ai drwy etholiad neu, yn wir, o bosibl, drwy refferendwm ar y cytundeb ei hun. Oherwydd, os nad oes unrhyw ffordd arall o'i ddatrys, yna mae gan y bobl a bleidleisiodd yn 2016 berffaith hawl i benderfynu pa fath o gytundeb y maen nhw eisiau ei gymeradwyo o 2018 ymlaen. Mae'n ymddangos yn briodol y dylai hynny ddigwydd. Ond mae'n ymddangos i mi mai'r peth cyntaf i'w wneud yw i Seneddau'r DU archwilio unrhyw gytundeb a phenderfynu ar ba un a ddylid cefnogi'r cytundeb hwnnw ai peidio. Os bydd wedyn, er enghraifft, etholiad cyffredinol os caiff y cytundeb hwnnw ei wrthod, a bod hwnnw'n arwain at ganlyniad amhendant, wel, sut arall y gellir ei ddatrys heblaw drwy refferendwm ar y cytundeb? Rwy'n credu bod hynny'n dod yn anochel ar yr adeg honno.
English: We have done a great deal, as he will know - for example, the fact that we've helped local authorities in terms of providing services for care for children; the fact, for example, that we've put so much money into child and adolescent mental health services, where so many young people have had benefit from the £8 million extra we've given to CAMHS; and, of course, we have the children's commissioner there, who is able to advise us in terms of what more we might need to do.
Welsh: Rydym ni wedi gwneud llawer iawn, fel y bydd ef yn gwybod - er enghraifft, y ffaith ein bod ni wedi helpu awdurdodau lleol o ran darparu gwasanaethau ar gyfer gofal plant; y ffaith, er enghraifft, ein bod ni wedi cyfrannu cymaint o arian at wasanaethau iechyd meddwl plant a'r glasoed, lle mae cymaint o bobl ifanc wedi elwa ar yr £8 miliwn ychwanegol yr ydym ni wedi ei roi i CAMHS; ac, wrth gwrs, mae gennym ni'r comisiynydd plant yno, sy'n gallu ein cynghori ni o ran beth arall y gallai fod angen i ni ei wneud.
English: Well, First Minister, you'll be aware of the very worrying report published by the Children's Commissioner for Wales that showed that, on a number of counts, the Welsh Government is failing to deliver the support needed for children and young people with learning disabilities. The report showed that 83 per cent of parents surveyed said they were worried their children were socially isolated, and many highlighted concerns about bullying. First Minister, in light of this damning report, can you tell us what immediate action the Welsh Government will now take to address the concerns highlighted by the children's commissioner and support children and young people with learning disabilities?
Welsh: Wel, Prif Weinidog, byddwch yn ymwybodol o'r adroddiad sy'n peri pryder mawr a gyhoeddwyd gan Gomisiynydd Plant Cymru a ddangosodd, ar sawl cyfrif, bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn methu â darparu'r cymorth sydd ei angen ar gyfer plant a phobl ifanc sydd ag anableddau dysgu. Roedd yr adroddiad yn dangos bod 83 y cant o rieni a holwyd yn dweud eu bod yn poeni bod eu plant wedi'u hynysu yn gymdeithasol, a tynnodd llawer sylw at bryderon am fwlio. Prif Weinidog, yng ngoleuni'r adroddiad damniol hwn, a allwch chi ddweud wrthym ni pa gamau y bydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn eu cymryd nawr i fynd i'r afael â'r pryderon a amlygwyd gan y comisiynydd plant a chynorthwyo plant a phobl ifanc sydd ag anableddau dysgu?
English: Well, it's hugely important with a report like this that there is a proper response given by Government, and that response will be given, of course, and consideration given to what the children's commissioner has actually said.
Welsh: Wel, mae'n hynod bwysig gydag adroddiad fel hwn bod ymateb priodol yn cael ei roi gan Lywodraeth, a bydd yr ymateb hwnnw'n cael ei roi, wrth gwrs, ac ystyriaeth yn cael ei rhoi i'r hyn y mae'r comisiynydd plant wedi ei ddweud mewn gwirionedd.
English: First Minister, the Welsh Government has already committed to upholding the rights of children and young people across Wales, and yet we have seen a number of recent reports in recent months where the Welsh Government is failing children and young people. Of course, one way the Welsh Government could better support children and young people and uphold their rights is by supporting my proposed autism Bill, which has indeed the backing of independent bodies such as the National Autistic Society and the Equality and Human Rights Commission and is supported by many in this Chamber. First Minister, will you now therefore commit to supporting the autism Bill, which will actually send a clear message to children and young people across Wales that the Welsh Government will do all that it can to support them?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, mae Llywodraeth Cymru eisoes wedi ymrwymo i gynnal hawliau plant a phobl ifanc ledled Cymru, ond eto rydym ni wedi gweld nifer o adroddiadau diweddar yn y misoedd diwethaf lle mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn siomi plant a phobl ifanc. Wrth gwrs, un ffordd y gallai Llywodraeth Cymru gynorthwyo plant a phobl ifanc yn well a chynnal eu hawliau yw trwy gefnogi fy mil Awtistiaeth arfaethedig, sydd wedi cael cefnogaeth cyrff annibynnol fel y Gymdeithas Awtistiaeth Genedlaethol a'r Comisiwn Cydraddoldeb a Hawliau Dynol yn wir ac a gefnogir gan lawer yn y Siambr hon. Prif Weinidog, a wnewch chi ymrwymo nawr felly i gefnogi'r Bil awtistiaeth, a fydd yn anfon neges eglur i blant a phobl ifanc ledled Cymru y bydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn gwneud popeth o fewn ei gallu i'w cynorthwyo?
English: We will do all that we can to support parents and, indeed, young people with autism. That does not necessarily mean that it has to be done via a Bill. It's hugely important that resources are made available and we have done that in terms of support. It's also hugely important that we are able to work with organisations to deliver the best package for young people with autism. So, while I'm convinced that a Bill would do it, it's hugely important that we look to see what further resource can be identified in order to help those people who live with the condition every day.
Welsh: Byddwn yn gwneud popeth o fewn ein gallu i gynorthwyo rhieni ac, yn wir, pobl ifanc ag awtistiaeth. Nid yw hynny o reidrwydd yn golygu bod yn rhaid ei wneud trwy gyfrwng Bil. Mae'n hynod bwysig bod adnoddau ar gael ac rydym ni wedi gwneud hynny o ran cymorth. Mae hefyd yn hynod bwysig ein bod ni'n gallu gweithio gyda sefydliadau i ddarparu'r pecyn gorau ar gyfer pobl ifanc ag awtistiaeth. Felly, er fy mod i'n argyhoeddedig y byddai Bil yn llwyddo i'w wneud, mae'n eithriadol o bwysig ein bod ni'n edrych i weld pa adnoddau ychwanegol y gellir eu nodi er mwyn helpu'r bobl hynny sy'n byw gyda'r cyflwr bob dydd.
English: We work closely with a number of partners, including Sport Wales and Natural Resources Wales, to provide opportunities for people of all ages to participate in a range of outdoor leisure activities. It is important that we make use of our natural landscape to encourage people to become more active.
Welsh: Rydym ni'n gweithio'n agos gyda nifer o bartneriaid, gan gynnwys Chwaraeon Cymru a Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru, i gynnig cyfleoedd i bobl o bob oed gymryd rhan mewn amrywiaeth o weithgareddau hamdden yn yr awyr agored. Mae'n bwysig ein bod ni'n gwneud defnydd o'n tirwedd naturiol i annog pobl i fod yn fwy egnïol.
English: I thank the First Minister for that response. A constituent who is a keen off-road cyclist has written to me from Kidwelly to complain that a large area of land near Merthyr Tydfil that is owned by Natural Resources Wales has been leased to a private company and trades under the name of BikePark Wales, as a result of which there's been a restriction on public access to that land. And I looked at BikePark Wales's website this morning, which says: 'Any rider caught tresspassing on the trails without a valid pass will be fined on the spot, this will be enforced by our marshalls.' A rather dictatorial attitude to take in these circumstances. Can the First Minister tell me what's the policy on public access to Welsh Government owned land for the purpose of cycling and walking, and how this new policy of privatisation might affect the active Wales initiative by banning local people from free and unrestricted access?
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Prif Weinidog am yr ymateb yna. Mae etholwr sy'n feiciwr oddi ar y ffordd brwd wedi ysgrifennu ataf i o Gydweli i gwyno bod darn mawr o dir ger Merthyr Tudful sy'n eiddo i Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru wedi ei brydlesu i gwmni preifat ac yn masnachu o dan yr enw BikePark Wales, ac o ganlyniad i hynny bu cyfyngiad ar fynediad cyhoeddus i'r tir hwnnw. Ac edrychais ar wefan BikePark Wales y bore yma, sy'n dweud: Bydd unrhyw dresmasiad ar y llwybrau heb drwydded ddilys yn destun dirwy yn y fan a'r lle, a bydd hyn yn cael ei orfodi gan ein swyddogion. Agwedd braidd yn unbenaethol i'w mabwysiadu o dan yr amgylchiadau hyn. A all y Prif Weinidog ddweud wrthyf beth yw'r polisi ar fynediad cyhoeddus i dir sy'n eiddo i Lywodraeth Cymru at ddibenion cerdded a beicio, a sut y gallai'r polisi newydd hwn o breifateiddio effeithio ar fenter Cymru egnïol trwy wahardd pobl leol rhag cael mynediad rhydd ac anghyfyngedig?
English: Well, I'm not aware of the area of land he's talking about, but, certainly, I cannot see any legal way in which people can have money extorted from them simply because they're standing on a piece of land. I can't see any way where that can be enforced in any lawful way. But, if the Member writes to me with more details, I will, of course, be pleased to look at this in more detail.
Welsh: Wel, nid wyf yn ymwybodol o'r darn o dir y mae'n sôn amdano, ond, yn sicr, ni allaf weld unrhyw ffordd gyfreithiol y gall pobl gael arian wedi ei wasgu oddi wrthynt dim ond am eu bod yn sefyll ar ddarn o dir. Ni allaf weld unrhyw ffordd lle y gellir gorfodi hynny mewn unrhyw ffordd gyfreithlon. Ond, os gwnaiff yr Aelod ysgrifennu ataf gyda rhagor o fanylion, byddaf, wrth gwrs, yn falch o edrych ar hyn yn fanylach.
English: First Minister, at the same time that Santander's sponsored community bike scheme has finally come to life - I'm really pleased about that - and there are more and more cycle tracks becoming apparent in Swansea, the local authority plan to dig up much-loved and well-used tennis courts in Mumbles and replace them with a temporary car park. At least the Swansea council did listen to residents' complaints about this and have withdrawn their plans for now. At a time when we're trying to get people out of their cars and we have the active travel agenda, as we've just heard, and we want people visiting Wales and some of our most important tourism spots, I think this was a bit of a strange and muddled plan from Swansea council. So, do you agree that, at a time when the city region is bringing councils together to think big picture about the regeneration of the area, they should be looking at active travel in exactly the same way and avoiding short-sighted decisions like this, which actually reduce the opportunities for people to take part in activity?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, ar yr un pryd ag y mae cynllun beiciau cymunedol noddedig Santander wedi bywiogi o'r diwedd - rwy'n falch iawn am hynny - a bod mwy a mwy o lwybrau beicio yn dod i'r amlwg yn Abertawe, mae'r awdurdod lleol yn bwriadu tyrchu'r cyrtiau tenis y mae pobl yn hoff iawn ohonynt ac sy'n cael llawer o ddefnydd yn y Mwmbwls, a'u disodli gyda maes parcio dros dro. Gwrandawodd cyngor Abertawe ar gwynion trigolion am hyn o leiaf, ac maen nhw wedi tynnu eu cynlluniau yn ôl am y tro. Ar adeg pan ein bod ni'n ceisio cael pobl allan o'u ceir a bod gennym ni'r agenda teithio llesol, fel yr ydym ni newydd ei glywed, a'n bod ni eisiau pobl i ymweld â Chymru a rhai o'n mannau twristiaeth pwysicaf, rwy'n credu bod hwn yn dipyn o gynllun rhyfedd a dryslyd gan gyngor Abertawe. Felly, a ydych chi'n cytuno, ar adeg pan fo'r ddinas-ranbarth yn dod â chynghorau at ei gilydd i ystyried y darlun mawr o ran adfywio'r ardal, y dylen nhw fod yn ystyried teithio llesol yn union yr un ffordd ac osgoi penderfyniadau annoeth fel hyn, sydd mewn gwirionedd yn lleihau'r cyfleoedd i bobl gymryd rhan mewn gweithgareddau egnïol?
English: Well, that will be a matter for Swansea council, but we do expect, of course, local authorities to comply with the Active Travel (Wales) Act 2013 and to look for opportunities to ensure more people are able to cycle and cycle safely. I'm not familiar with the particular planning issue that the Member talks about, but I can assure her that it's the view of the Government that we want to see more opportunities arise for cycling and walking in the future.
Welsh: Wel, mater i gyngor Abertawe fydd hynny, ond rydym ni'n disgwyl, wrth gwrs, i awdurdodau lleol gydymffurfio â Deddf Teithio Llesol (Cymru) 2013 ac i chwilio am gyfleoedd i sicrhau bod mwy o bobl yn gallu beicio a beicio'n ddiogel. Nid wyf i'n gyfarwydd â'r mater cynllunio penodol y mae'r Aelod yn sôn amdano, ond gallaf ei sicrhau mai barn y Llywodraeth yw ein bod ni eisiau gweld mwy o gyfleoedd yn ymddangos i feicio a cherdded yn y dyfodol.
English: And playing tennis.
Welsh: A chwarae tenis.
English: And tennis. I beg your pardon.
Welsh: A thenis. Mae'n ddrwg gen i.
English: Yes. To be eligible to vote in Welsh elections you need to be registered and 18 years of age or over on polling day. I do intend, however, to support the bid to extend the franchise to include 16 and 17-year-olds.
Welsh: Gwnaf. I fod yn gymwys i bleidleisio yn etholiadau Cymru mae angen i chi fod yn gofrestredig ac yn 18 mlwydd oed neu'n hŷn ar y diwrnod pleidleisio. Rwyf yn bwriadu, fodd bynnag, cefnogi cais i ymestyn yr etholfraint i gynnwys pobl 16 a 17 mlwydd oed.
English: Thank you, First Minister. I've been contacted by a former constituent who's written to me to say that he feels disenfranchised at not being able to vote in Welsh elections. He was born in Wales and raised locally and has extensive family in mid Wales. He moved from mid Wales to Shropshire, where his job took him, and then went to work abroad. Contacting the election office in Powys, they've advised him that, as an overseas resident, he can only register to vote where he last lived. So, as a Welsh national, he is able to vote in a UK general election, but he can't vote in a Welsh general election. So, this does seem to me to be an anomaly. Can I ask if you are aware of this issue? If you are, has the Welsh Government made and could the Welsh Government make representation to the Electoral Commission?
Welsh: Diolch, Prif Weinidog. Mae cyn-etholwr wedi cysylltu â mi sydd wedi ysgrifennu ataf i ddweud ei fod yn teimlo wedi'i ddifreinio o fethu â gallu pleidleisio yn etholiadau Cymru. Fe'i ganwyd yng Nghymru a chafodd ei fagu'n lleol ac mae ganddo deulu helaeth yn y canolbarth. Symudodd o ganolbarth Cymru i swydd Amwythig, lle'r aeth ei swydd ag ef, ac yna aeth i weithio dramor. O gysylltu â'r swyddfa etholiadau ym Mhowys, maen nhw wedi ei gynghori, fel preswylydd tramor, mai dim ond yn y man lle'r oedd yn byw ddiwethaf y caiff gofrestru i bleidleisio. Felly, fel dinesydd Cymru, mae'n cael pleidleisio yn etholiad cyffredinol y DU, ond ni chaiff bleidleisio mewn etholiad cyffredinol yng Nghymru. Felly, mae'n ymddangos i mi bod hwn yn anghyson. A gaf i ofyn pa un a ydych chi'n ymwybodol o'r mater hwn? Os ydych chi, a yw Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gwneud ac a allai Llywodraeth Cymru gyflwyno sylwadau i'r Comisiwn Etholiadol?