English: Thank you. As I indicated earlier, I agree with the Member with regard to the make-up of the composite of the materials, and I've asked for samples to be taken from all of the buildings that hold lagging - multi-storey buildings - for inspection. They will be tested, irrespective of what we understand of the product already, although we do know that it's not the same system that was used in London as in our services. Nevertheless, to give confidence to people in Wales, I think we should do that as the bare minimum. In terms of the building regs, I would err on the side that we are stronger in some cases in terms of the development of our building regs. They have been reviewed recently, but I'm sure the Minister and myself will have further conversations about how we may need to strengthen them post the review of the fire service inspectorate. In terms of sprinklers, the Members is also right to raise this issue. The Member will be aware that I was heavily criticised for introducing more red tape into the system and for introducing more cost into the system, by builders and other interested parties. I didn't regret it then and I do not regret it now - this is the very reason why we need to ensure that we have safe buildings for people, and sprinklers are the option. I hope that other parts of the country will take that on board too. In terms of the guidance issued, we are confident that the guidance issued by RSLs and local authorities is appropriate where the building framework acts appropriately. What we saw in Grenfell Tower, where residents were told to stay in situ, was that that would have been fine subject to fire doors working properly, or fire doors being installed properly. There is an awful lot of detail to come from the investigation into Grenfell Tower, but our guidance and practices are being reviewed and we will consider that as we move forward.
Welsh: Diolch. Fel y nodais yn gynharach, rwy'n cytuno gyda'r Aelod mewn perthynas â gwneuthuriad cyfansoddiad y deunyddiau, ac rwyf wedi gofyn am gymryd samplau o bob un o'r adeiladau lle mae deunydd ynysu - adeiladau aml-lawr - ar gyfer eu harolygu. Byddant yn cael eu profi, beth bynnag y gwyddom ni am y cynnyrch yn barod, er y gwyddom ni nad y system a ddefnyddiwyd yn Llundain yw'r un yn ein gwasanaethau ni. Serch hynny, er mwyn rhoi hyder i bobl yng Nghymru, rwy'n credu y dylem ni wneud hynny o leiaf. O ran y rheoliadau adeiladu, byddwn o blaid bod yn gryfach mewn rhai achosion o ran datblygu ein rheoliadau adeiladu. Maen nhw wedi cael eu hadolygu'n ddiweddar, ond rwy'n siŵr y caiff y Gweinidog a minnau sgyrsiau pellach ynglŷn â sut y gall fod angen i ni eu cryfhau nhw yn dilyn adolygiad o'r arolygiaeth gwasanaeth tân. O ran systemau chwistrellu, mae'r aelodau hefyd yn iawn i godi'r mater hwn. Bydd yr Aelod yn gwybod y cefais i fy meirniadu'n llym am gyflwyno mwy o fiwrocratiaeth i'r system ac am gyflwyno mwy o gostau i'r system, gan adeiladwyr a phobl eraill â diddordeb. Doeddwn i ddim yn difaru bryd hynny a dydw i ddim yn difaru nawr - dyma'r union reswm pam bod angen i ni sicrhau bod gennym ni adeiladau diogel i bobl, a systemau chwistrellu yw'r ateb. Gobeithio y bydd rhannau eraill o'r wlad yn ystyried hynny hefyd. O ran y canllawiau a gyhoeddwyd, rydym ni'n hyderus y bydd y canllawiau a gyhoeddwyd gan Landlordiaid Cymdeithasol Cofrestredig ac awdurdodau lleol yn briodol lle mae'r fframwaith adeiladu yn gweithredu'n briodol. Yr hyn a welsom ni yn Nhŵr Grenfell, lle y dywedwyd wrth drigolion am aros yn eu fflatiau, oedd y byddai hynny wedi bod yn iawn petai'r drysau tân yn gweithio'n iawn, neu'r drysau tân wedi eu gosod yn gywir. Mae llawer iawn o fanylion i ddod o'r ymchwiliad i Dŵr Grenfell, ond mae ein canllawiau ac arferion yn cael eu hadolygu a byddwn yn ystyried hynny wrth inni symud ymlaen.