English: Some observations, really. I think there's an issue with postal voting, especially for disabled people and elderly people whose signature doesn't always correspond and they've found that their votes have been discounted in recent elections. I think if we're all honest here, as well, then we all know that there is also an issue with postal voting and the integrity of the process. I have concerns of going down the road of postal voting more, because I actually think that postal voting should be restricted. There should be a reason why you have a postal vote, because the process is abused, and we all know this. We do need to encourage people to vote, and I think the idea of supermarkets and other places like that is a very, very good idea. Again, back to the integrity of the process, there was an example in 2016 in the Assembly election in the Cardiff West constituency where somebody went to vote at 08:30, and they'd been told they had already voted. The individual gave the person a description of the person who had been there at 07:30 and voted in his name. Now, I think there's certainly an argument for, maybe, identification when voting, because the process at the minute is far too easy to abuse, I would say, to use the same phrase again. I'd like to see local referenda given some teeth. Again, we had a local referendum where I live, where 99.9 per cent of people voted in a certain way, and they just were not listened to, and thousands of people voted, as well. I've got to touch on the dual mandate. I assume it applies to the House of Lords as well. Maybe you can clarify that. [Interruption.] I certainly would not, but there are some colleagues here who have a dual mandate there. More than anything else, it's a matter of democratic principle. I was elected as a councillor, and recently re-elected. Everybody knew I was an Assembly Member. What gives you the right as an individual, as a Minister, to say to people they can't vote for me or anybody else to be their councillor? In terms of the allowances, yes, I'm happily donating my allowances, 50 per cent to the community and 50 per cent to Plaid Cymru. But the issue is one of democracy. Who are you, Minister, or Cabinet Secretary, to tell people they haven't got the right to vote for people? It's not right.
Welsh: Dim ond rhai sylwadau, mewn gwirionedd. Rwy'n credu bod problem gyda phleidleisio drwy'r post, yn enwedig ar gyfer pobl anabl a phobl hŷn nad yw eu llofnod bob amser yn cyfateb, ac maen nhw wedi canfod bod eu pleidleisiau wedi eu diystyrru mewn etholiadau diweddar. Rwy'n credu, os ydym ni i gyd yn onest yn y fan yma, hefyd, fe wyddom ni i gyd fod yna broblem gyda phleidleisio drwy'r post a didwylledd y broses. Mae gen i bryderon ynglŷn ag annog mwy o bleidleisio drwy'r post, gan fy mod i'n credu y dylai pleidleisio drwy'r post gael ei gyfyngu. Dylai fod rheswm pam y mae gennych bleidlais drwy'r post, oherwydd caiff y broses ei chamddefnyddio, ac rydym ni i gyd yn gwybod hynny. Mae angen i ni annog pobl i bleidleisio, ac rwy'n credu bod y syniad o archfarchnadoedd a mannau eraill cyffelyb yn syniad gwirioneddol dda. Unwaith eto, yn ôl at uniondeb y broses, roedd enghraifft yn 2016 yn etholiad y Cynulliad yn etholaeth Gorllewin Caerdydd, pryd yr aeth rhywun i bleidleisio am 08:30, ac fe ddywedwyd wrtho ei fod eisoes wedi pleidleisio. Rhoddodd yr unigolyn ddisgrifiad i'r person o'r sawl a oedd wedi bod yno am 07:30 ac wedi pleidleisio yn ei enw ef. Nawr, rwy'n sicr yn credu bod dadl dros, efallai, brofi hunaniaeth wrth bleidleisio, oherwydd fe ddywedwn i fod y broses ar y funud yn llawer rhy hawdd ei chamddefnyddio, i ddefnyddio'r un ymadrodd eto. Fe hoffwn i weld refferenda lleol yn cael grym gwirioneddol. Unwaith eto, cawsom refferendwm lleol yn lle rwyf i'n byw, pryd y pleidleisiodd 99.9 y cant o bobl yn mewn ffordd arbennig, ac fe gawson nhw eu hanwybyddu, ac fe bleidleisiodd miloedd o bobl hefyd. Mae'n rhaid i mi gyffwrdd ar y mandad deuol. Rwy'n cymryd yn ganiataol ei fod yn berthnasol i Dŷ'r Arglwyddi hefyd. Efallai y gallwch chi egluro hynny.[Torri ar draws.] Ni fyddai gen i, yn sicr, ond mae gan rai cyd-Aelodau yma fandad deuol yn hynny o beth. Yn anad dim, mae'n fater o egwyddor ddemocrataidd. Cefais fy ethol yn gynghorydd, a'm hail-ethol yn ddiweddar. Roedd pawb yn gwybod fy mod yn Aelod Cynulliad. Beth sy'n rhoi'r hawl i chi fel unigolyn, fel Gweinidog, i ddweud wrth bobl na chânt bleidleisio drosof i neu dros unrhyw un arall i fod yn gynghorydd iddyn nhw? O ran y lwfansau, ydw, rwy'n hapus i roi fy lwfansau, 50 y cant i'r gymuned a 50 y cant i Blaid Cymru. Ond mater o ddemocratiaeth yw hwn. Pwy ydych chi, Weinidog, neu Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, i ddweud wrth bobl nad oes ganddyn nhw'r hawl i bleidleisio dros bobl? Nid yw hynny'n iawn.