English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. I'm pleased to have the opportunity to move amendments 2, 3, 4 and 5 tabled in the name of Plaid Cymru. Of course, in these amendments, we are focusing specifically on the things that were omitted from the autumn statement. It may be some sort of reflection of the different personality of this Chancellor. There is some suggestion that he didn't want to follow the theatrical approach taken by his predecessor and make a huge number of announcements all at once. He perhaps wanted to hold certain things back. I do hope, with some of the things that I am going to raise, that that is the case and that we won't have to wait too long for announcements that we hope to see. Amendment 2 refers to the electrification, not only of the Great Western line between Cardiff and Swansea, where there have been delays, which is quite unacceptable and which will, of course, impact on the economy to the west of Cardiff, but also the electrification of the north Wales main line. With regard to that, it is regrettable to see that there has been no agreement that HS2 is an England-only infrastructure project. There is evidence from KPMG that suggests that Wales would be worse off in terms of competitiveness as a result of HS2. Of course, because of its categorisation, there is no Barnett consequential as a result of HS2. That's very sad, if truth be told. I spoke to the Secretary of State about this issue at a CBI dinner, but why is Wales not treated equitably in terms of air passenger duty? There is no rationale, nor is there any ethical reasoning for that, when Wales needs it, in this post-Brexit period, when there is all this economic uncertainty. Why aren't we being given fair play? That's what we're asking for - the same powers as have been granted to Northern Ireland and Scotland.
Welsh: Diolch, Ddirprwy Lywydd. Rydw i'n falch i fedru symud gwelliannau 2, 3, 4 a 5 yn enw Plaid Cymru. Ac wrth gwrs, mae'r gwelliannau yma yn ffocysu yn benodol ar y pethau a adawyd mas o'r datganiad. Efallai ei fod yn rhyw fath o adlewyrchiad o bersonoliaeth wahanol y Canghellor yma. Mae yna ryw awgrym nad oedd am ddilyn y math o ymagwedd mwy theatrig a oedd gan y Canghellor blaenorol a chyhoeddi llwyth o bethau'r un pryd, felly roedd e eisiau, efallai, dal rhai pethau yn ôl. Rwy'n gobeithio, gyda rhai o'r pethau rwyf am eu codi mewn munud, mai dyna beth ddigwyddodd, ac na fyddwn ni'n gorfod aros yn rhy hir ar gyfer y cyhoeddiadau rydym am eu gweld. Rydym ni'n cyfeirio yng ngwelliant 2, wrth gwrs, at drydaneiddio, nid yn unig y llinell rhwng Caerdydd ac Abertawe, lle mae yna oedi, wrth gwrs, sy'n gwbl annerbyniol, ac sy'n mynd i effeithio, wrth gwrs, ar yr economi i'r gorllewin o Gaerdydd, ond hefyd trydaneiddio llinell gogledd Cymru. Yn y cyswllt yna, wrth gwrs, hefyd, mae'n beth gwael i weld nad oes cytundeb mai prosiect ar gyfer Lloegr yn unig ydy HS2 a dweud y gwir. Mae yna dystiolaeth gan KPMG sy'n awgrymu y bydd Cymru mewn sefyllfa waeth o ran cystadleurwydd ar ôl HS2, ac eto, oherwydd y ffordd mae wedi cael ei gategoreiddio, wrth gwrs, nid oes codiad Barnett o ran cyllid yn sgil hynny. Mae'n drist ofnadwy, a dweud y gwir. Cefais air gydag Ysgrifennydd Gwladol Cymru ynglŷn â hyn yng nghinio'r CBI. Pam, unwaith eto, nad yw Cymru yn cael ei drin yn gydradd o ran y dreth teithwyr awyr? Nid oes yna ddim rhesymeg, nid oes yna ddim moeseg y tu ôl i'r penderfyniad, a dweud y gwir, pan mae Cymru ei angen, yn y cyfnod ôl-Brexit yma, sy'n fregus yn economaidd â'r holl ansicrwydd. Pam nad ydym ni'n cael chwarae teg? Dyna beth rydym ni'n gofyn amdano fe, wrth gwrs: yr un gallu ag sydd wedi cael ei roi i Ogledd Iwerddon a'r Alban.