techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, from that it appears that the only thing that has been achieved is the waste of thousands of pounds of taxpayers' money and the time of Welsh Government officials in holding consultation upon consultation, with proposals on legislation that will now be ignored. At least with the most recent White Paper, there was a way forward that didn't require local authority mergers. So, can I ask you first of all what negotiations took place in Cabinet before you decided to put aside the work of your predecessor? Can you also explain to us today what the next action points are? Will you now be turning your back entirely on the White Paper and the outcomes of the consultation related to that? What will be the timetable for this u-turn? Will you create a new map for authority mergers? Is that the intention? If that is the intention, how will you succeed where Leighton Andrews failed?
Welsh: Wel, mae'n swnio o hynny mai'r unig beth sydd wedi cael ei gyflawni ydy gwastraffu miloedd o bunnoedd o bres trethdalwyr ac amser swyddogion Llywodraeth Cymru yn cynnal ymgynghoriad ar ôl ymgynghoriad a chynigion ar ddeddfu a fydd rŵan yn cael eu hanwybyddu. O leiaf efo'r Papur Gwyn diweddaraf, mi oedd yna ffordd ymlaen nad oedd yn gorfodi awdurdodau i uno. A gaf i ofyn i ddechrau pa drafodaethau a gafwyd yn y Cabinet cyn i chi benderfynu rhoi'r gorau i ddilyn gwaith eich rhagflaenydd chi? Wedyn, a fedrwch chi egluro i ni heddiw beth ydy'r camau gweithredol nesaf, felly? A fyddwch chi rŵan yn rhoi'r gorau'n llwyr i'r Papur Gwyn a chanlyniadau'r ymgynghoriad a ddaeth yn sgil hwnnw? Beth fydd yr amserlen ar gyfer y tro pedol yma? Ac a fyddwch chi'n creu map newydd ar gyfer uno cynghorau? Ai dyna ydy'r bwriad? Ac os mai hynny ydy'r bwriad, sut ydych chi'n mynd i lwyddo lle methodd Leighton Andrews?
English: I would suggest that the Member re-reads the blog, and reads beyond the first paragraphs, to see what I was trying to say. What I was trying to say was that we need a slightly more mature relationship between the various tiers of local government and to try to move away from the kind of discussion that we have had over the past few years. I saw that you were reading your second question. It might have been easier had you listened to the answer to your first question, because I stated clearly there that I didn't put my predecessor's proposals to one side. That was done by local government and, because of that, I have to reconsider the local government stance on this. Having had time to consider the way forward, I will bring a statement to the Assembly.
Welsh: Mi fuaswn i'n awgrymu bod yr Aelod yn ailddarllen y blog, efallai, a darllen tu hwnt i'r paragraffau cyntaf, am beth roeddwn yn trio ei ddweud yn fanna. Beth roeddwn i'n trio'i ddweud oedd bod eisiau perthynas tipyn bach yn fwy aeddfed rhwng gwahanol lefelau o lywodraeth a hefyd trio symud i ffwrdd o'r math o drafodaeth yr ydym ni wedi ei chael yn ystod y blynyddoedd diwethaf. Roeddwn i'n gweld eich bod yn darllen eich ail gwestiwn. Mi fuasai wedi bod yn rhwyddach petai chi wedi gwrando ar yr ateb i'r cwestiwn cyntaf, achos mi ddywedais i yn glir fanna nad fi oedd wedi rhoi o'r neilltu gynigion fy rhagflaenydd. Llywodraeth leol oedd wedi gwneud hynny ac felly, oherwydd hynny, mae'n rhaid i fi ailystyried safbwynt llywodraeth leol ac rydw i'n gwneud hynny ar hyn o bryd. Pan fyddaf i wedi cael amser i ystyried y ffordd ymlaen, byddaf yn dod â datganiad i'r Cynulliad.
English: I entirely accept that it's local government who have told you, and I quote from the blog:
Welsh: Rydw i'n derbyn yn llwyr mai llywodraeth leol sydd wedi dweud wrthych chi, ac rydw i'n dyfynnu o'r blog:
English: That suggests to me that it wasn't a runner for them, and you agree with them, and you're going to turn your back on that policy. That was the policy in the White Paper, so I don't quite understand what you're trying to say. Having clarity would be most useful. So can you confirm today whether your vision, on the basis of what you've heard from local government, will include regional collaboration on a mandatory basis as outlined in the original proposals?
Welsh: Mae hynny'n awgrymu i fi nad oedd e'n runner iddyn nhw. Rydych chi'n cytuno efo nhw, ac felly rydych chi'n mynd i roi'r gorau i'r polisi yna. Dyna oedd y polisi yn y Papur Gwyn. Felly, nid wyf i'n deall beth rydych chi'n drio ei ddweud yn union. Mi fuasai cael eglurder yn ddefnyddiol iawn. Felly, a fedrwch chi gadarnhau heddiw yma a fydd eich gweledigaeth chi, ar sail beth rydych chi wedi ei glywed gan lywodraeth leol, yn cynnwys cydweithio rhanbarthol mandadol fel oedd yn y cynigion gwreiddiol?
English: Diolch, Llywydd. Although the UK Government's July 2017 response to the defence select committee report, responding to the armed forces covenant annual report commented on progress - and it used the word 'progress' - in Wales, there hasn't yet been an independent review of progress and delivery across the whole of Wales since the establishment of the armed forces covenant. You are the Welsh Government lead on policy in relation to armed forces and veterans. What proposals, therefore, do you have to undertake or commission an independent review of progress and/or to give attention to the evidence-based recommendations made by the Assembly armed forces committee inquiry into the implementation of the armed forces covenant?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Er bod ymateb Llywodraeth y DU ym mis Gorffennaf 2017 i adroddiad y pwyllgor dethol ar amddiffyn, a oedd yn ymateb i adroddiad blynyddol cyfamod y lluoedd arfog, yn cynnwys sylwadau ar gynnydd - a defnyddiwyd y gair 'cynnydd' - yng Nghymru, nid oes adolygiad annibynnol wedi bod eto ar gynnydd a darpariaeth ledled Cymru ers sefydlu cyfamod y lluoedd arfog. Chi sy'n arwain polisi Llywodraeth Cymru mewn perthynas â'r lluoedd arfog a chyn-filwyr. Pa gynigion sydd gennych felly i gynnal neu gomisiynu adolygiad annibynnol o gynnydd a/neu roi sylw i argymhellion sy'n seiliedig ar dystiolaeth a wnaed gan ymchwiliad pwyllgor lluoedd arfog y Cynulliad i weithrediad cyfamod y lluoedd arfog?
English: I think the Member was at the meeting of the all-party group earlier this month when I attended and answered some questions on those issues. Can I say that I'm very comfortable at the moment with the level of delivery in terms of what we're able to do for delivering on the armed forces covenant and our services for veterans? I believe that we need to go somewhat further in the future. There were some very good recommendations from the all-party group. I have, in previous answers, undertaken to consider all of those recommendations and I will in due course, when I have had an opportunity to do so, make a full response on all of those matters. But I absolutely agree with the Conservative spokesperson that these are serious issues that require a serious approach.
Welsh: Credaf fod yr Aelod yng nghyfarfod y grŵp hollbleidiol yn gynharach y mis hwn pan oeddwn yn bresennol i ateb cwestiynau ar y materion hynny. A gaf fi ddweud fy mod yn gyfforddus iawn ar hyn o bryd gyda lefel y ddarpariaeth o ran yr hyn y gallwn ei wneud ar gyflawni cyfamod y lluoedd arfog a'n gwasanaethau ar gyfer cyn-filwyr? Credaf y bydd angen inni fynd ychydig ymhellach yn y dyfodol. Cafwyd rhai argymhellion da iawn gan y grŵp hollbleidiol. Mewn atebion blaenorol, rwyf wedi ymrwymo i ystyried pob un o'r argymhellion hynny, a maes o law, pan fyddaf wedi cael cyfle i wneud hynny, byddaf yn rhoi ymateb llawn ar y holl faterion hynny. Ond cytunaf yn llwyr â llefarydd y Ceidwadwyr fod y rhain yn faterion difrifol sy'n galw am ymagwedd ddifrifol.
English: Thank you. Notwithstanding the, I think, £100,000 extra continuation funding provided for Veterans NHS Wales, the report highlighted, or recommended, that funding for Veterans NHS Wales should be reviewed and targets for access to the service established, and performance against the targets regularly published. As at the time we debated this in November, waiting lists for Veterans NHS Wales were nine months in the Swansea area and averaging five to six months elsewhere. Although they'd secured three years extra funding from Help the Heroes to employ three full-time therapists to bring waiting lists down, they expected waiting times to rise again without additional support. And they've also provided me with figures showing that only 45 per cent of those veterans they're working with or referred to them are actually in employment. How, particularly, are you engaging with Veterans NHS Wales so that you and your colleague the heath Secretary are properly informed (a) on level of demand and (b) on their recommendations to address that?
Welsh: Diolch. Er y £100,000, rwy'n credu, o gyllid parhad ychwanegol a ddarparwyd ar gyfer GIG Cymru i gyn-filwyr, nododd yr adroddiad, neu argymhellodd yr adroddiad, y dylid adolygu'r cyllid ar gyfer GIG Cymru i gyn-filwyr a sefydlu targedau ar gyfer mynediad at y gwasanaeth, a chyhoeddi perfformiad yn erbyn y targedau yn rheolaidd. Pan drafodwyd hyn gennym ym mis Tachwedd, roedd y rhestrau aros ar gyfer GIG Cymru i gyn-filwyr yn naw mis yn ardal Abertawe ac yn bum neu chwe mis, ar gyfartaledd, mewn mannau eraill. Er eu bod wedi sicrhau tair blynedd o gyllid ychwanegol gan Help for Heroes i gyflogi tri therapydd amser llawn er mwyn lleihau'r rhestrau aros, roeddent yn disgwyl y byddai'r amseroedd aros yn codi eto heb gymorth ychwanegol. Ac maent hefyd wedi darparu ffigurau i mi sy'n dangos mai 45 y cant yn unig o'r cyn-filwyr y maent yn gweithio â hwy neu a atgyfeiriwyd atynt sydd mewn gwaith. Sut yn union rydych yn ymgysylltu â GIG Cymru i gyn-filwyr er mwyn sicrhau eich bod chi a'ch cyd-Aelod, yr Ysgrifennydd iechyd, yn cael yr holl wybodaeth o ran (a) lefel y galw a (b) eu hargymhellion er mwyn mynd i'r afael â hynny?
English: I hope that we are very well informed on both those matters, but can I say that the main method of engagement, if you like, is through the expert group that we have on these matters? I chaired my first meeting of that group, as it happens, earlier this month and I found the atmosphere there and the conversation we had there to be one of a wish to move very quickly and collaboratively together to ensure that we're able to deliver on all the ambitions and the commitments that we have given and that we have undertaken to deliver on behalf of veterans and others in the armed forces community and family in Wales. There are a number of different elements to that and you've described the challenges that we have in the health service. There are also significant challenges facing us in education and also in terms of the secure estate and provision in Wales. I think there are some significant areas there that we need to continue to address. I'm confident at the moment that the structure that we have in place helps us to do that. The expert group meeting I found to be a very useful meeting in terms of challenge on all of those different issues, and I will be responding to the all-party group and their report when I have the opportunity to have considered further some of their suggestions.
Welsh: Rwy'n gobeithio ein bod yn cael yr holl wybodaeth am y materion hynny, ond a gaf fi ddweud mai'r prif ddull o ymgysylltu, os mynnwch, yw drwy'r grŵp arbenigol sydd gennym ar y materion hyn? Cadeiriais fy nghyfarfod cyntaf o'r grŵp hwnnw yn gynharach y mis hwn fel mae'n digwydd, ac yn fy marn i, roedd yr awyrgylch yno a'r sgwrs a gawsom yno'n cyfleu dyhead i symud yn gyflym iawn ar y cyd gyda'n gilydd i sicrhau y gallwn gyflawni pob uchelgais a'r ymrwymiadau a roddwyd gennym i gyflawni ar ran cyn-filwyr ac eraill yng nghymuned a theulu'r lluoedd arfog yng Nghymru. Mae nifer o elfennau gwahanol i hynny ac rydych wedi disgrifio'r heriau sy'n ein hwynebu yn y gwasanaeth iechyd. Mae heriau sylweddol yn ein hwynebu o ran addysg hefyd, yn ogystal ag o ran sefydliadau diogel a darpariaeth yng Nghymru. Credaf fod meysydd pwysig yn hynny o beth y mae angen inni barhau i fynd i'r afael â hwy. Rwy'n hyderus ar hyn o bryd fod y strwythur sydd gennym ar waith yn ein cynorthwyo i wneud hynny. Credaf fod cyfarfod y grŵp arbenigol wedi bod yn ddefnyddiol iawn o ran yr her mewn perthynas â'r holl faterion gwahanol hynny, a byddaf yn ymateb i'r grŵp hollbleidiol a'u hadroddiad wedi i mi gael cyfle i ystyried rhai o'u hawgrymiadau ymhellach.
English: This is a matter that was raised at a previous question session by the Member for Carmarthen West and South Pembrokeshire. I undertook at that time to give due consideration to the matters that you've raised this afternoon. You will be aware that the Cabinet Secretary for health has announced an additional £100,000 to increase the capacity of our mental health services in the community, and he has also given an undertaking to look and understand how those services are being used and whether we do need to increase our capacity in those services. But I do accept that the point you raise is a very valid and important one and it is a matter that we will keep under due consideration. And if we do believe that there is a requirement for change in the way that you've described, then certainly that's a conversation I will have with the Cabinet Secretary for health, and I will come back to the Chamber to make announcements on that.
Welsh: Mae hwn yn fater a godwyd mewn sesiwn holi flaenorol gan yr Aelod dros Orllewin Caerfyrddin a De Sir Benfro. Ymrwymais bryd hynny i ystyried y materion a godwyd gennych y prynhawn yma. Byddwch yn gwybod bod Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros iechyd wedi cyhoeddi £100,000 ychwanegol i gynyddu capasiti ein gwasanaethau iechyd meddwl yn y gymuned, ac mae hefyd wedi ymrwymo i ystyried a deall sut y mae'r gwasanaethau hynny'n cael eu defnyddio ac a oes angen inni gynyddu ein capasiti yn y gwasanaethau hynny. Ond rwy'n derbyn bod y pwynt a godwch yn un dilys a phwysig iawn ac mae'n fater y byddwn yn ei ystyried yn ofalus. Ac os credwn fod angen newid yn y ffordd a ddisgrifiwyd gennych, yna yn sicr, mae honno'n sgwrs y byddaf yn ei chael gydag Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros iechyd, a byddaf yn dychwelyd i'r Siambr i wneud cyhoeddiadau ynglŷn â hynny.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. Good afternoon, Minister. I wanted to ask a couple of questions, if I may, relating to your recent statement on reforming local government electoral arrangements in Wales. One of your proposed reforms is to extend the vote to 16 and 17-year-olds. One of the arguments that has been used recently in support of that move is the principle of no taxation without representation, but I note that 16 and 17-year-olds aren't actually supposed to pay council tax, and figures from HMRC for 2014-15 suggest that only around 15 per cent of 16 and 17-year-olds pay any income tax. So, I think it's a laudable aim to extend the vote, but I wonder: is there an argument that perhaps we could extend the vote to some 16 and 17-year-olds but perhaps it might be extended to those who are actually paying tax?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Prynhawn da, Weinidog. Roeddwn yn awyddus i ofyn ychydig gwestiynau, os caf, ynghylch eich datganiad diweddar ar ddiwygio trefniadau etholiadol llywodraeth leol yng Nghymru. Un o'ch diwygiadau arfaethedig yw ymestyn y bleidlais i bobl 16 ac 17 oed. Un o'r dadleuon a ddefnyddiwyd yn ddiweddar i gefnogi'r newid hwnnw yw egwyddor dim trethiant heb gynrychiolaeth, ond nodaf nad yw pobl 16 a 17 oed i fod i dalu'r dreth gyngor mewn gwirionedd, ac mae ffigurau CThEM ar gyfer 2014-15 yn awgrymu mai oddeutu 15 y cant yn unig o bobl 16 a 17 oed sy'n talu unrhyw dreth incwm. Felly, credaf fod ymestyn y bleidlais yn nod canmoladwy, ond tybed: a oes dadl efallai y gallem ymestyn y bleidlais i rai pobl 16 a 17 oed ond efallai y dylid ei hymestyn i'r rheini sy'n talu treth mewn gwirionedd?
English: I'm not entirely sure of the point that the Member seeks to make, but I will say to him that the decision to extend the vote to 16 and 17-year-olds in local elections - and I hope the National Assembly will follow in due course - is that we're talking about extending and deepening a franchise to enable people throughout our communities to play an active role in taking decisions upon the future of those communities. It is the view of this Government, and I think of people on most sides of this Chamber, that 16 and 17-year-olds certainly should have the capacity to be engaged in political debate and discussion, and should have the ability to vote and take part in decisions that will affect them and their friends', neighbours' and families' lives. I think we are in a process of renewal and change at the moment. I'm looking at extending the franchise in order to enable us to hold local elections on the new franchise, which will also seek, of course, to ensure that all foreign nationals who are resident and living in our communities will also have the vote.
Welsh: Nid wyf yn hollol siŵr beth yw'r pwynt y mae'r Aelod yn ceisio'i wneud, ond gallaf ddweud wrtho fod y penderfyniad i ymestyn y bleidlais i bobl 16 a 17 oed mewn etholiadau lleol - ac rwy'n gobeithio y bydd y Cynulliad Cenedlaethol yn gwneud yr un peth maes o law - yn ymwneud ag ymestyn a dyfnhau'r etholfraint er mwyn galluogi pobl yn ein cymunedau drwyddi draw i chwarae rhan weithredol yn gwneud penderfyniadau ynglŷn â dyfodol y cymunedau hynny. Yn sicr, barn y Llywodraeth hon, a'r rhan fwyaf o'r pleidiau yn y Siambr hon, rwy'n credu, yw y dylai pobl 16 a 17 oed yn bendant allu cymryd rhan mewn dadleuon a thrafodaethau gwleidyddol, ac y dylent allu pleidleisio a chymryd rhan yn y penderfyniadau a fydd yn effeithio ar eu bywydau a bywydau eu ffrindiau, cymdogion a theuluoedd. Credaf ein bod ar ganol proses o adnewyddu a newid ar hyn o bryd. Edrychaf ymlaen at ymestyn yr etholfraint er mwyn ein galluogi i gynnal etholiadau lleol ar yr etholfraint newydd, a fydd hefyd, wrth gwrs, yn ceisio sicrhau y bydd yr holl wladolion tramor sy'n byw yn ein cymunedau hefyd yn cael pleidleisio.
English: Yes, I'm aware of those proposals as well. If I can restrict these questions to the 16 and 17-year-olds issue for the time being, another perhaps related point is that we have in this Assembly recently passed legislation that in effect banned 16 and 17-year-olds from being able to use sunbeds or to get a tongue piercing. We in UKIP supported those pieces of Government legislation. If you're now saying that 16 and 17-year-olds should have an automatic right to vote, so they are able to exercise political judgment, but at the same time they're not able to exercise judgment over issues like using sunbeds or getting a tongue piercing, does that not present an anomaly? Can you see that the electorate may see that there is a certain incongruity about the attitudes that are coming from the Welsh Government with those two seemingly conflicting attitudes?
Welsh: Ydw, rwy'n ymwybodol o'r cynigion hynny hefyd. Os caf gyfyngu'r cwestiynau hyn i fater y bobl 16 a 17 oed am y tro, pwynt arall cysylltiedig, efallai, yw ein bod yn y Cynulliad wedi cyflwyno deddfwriaeth yn ddiweddar a oedd i bob pwrpas yn gwahardd pobl 16 ac 17 oed rhag defnyddio gwelyau haul neu dyllu eu tafodau. Roeddem ni yn UKIP yn cefnogi'r deddfau Llywodraeth hynny. Os ydych bellach yn dweud y dylai fod gan bobl 16 a 17 oed hawl awtomatig i bleidleisio, fel eu bod yn gallu arfer crebwyll gwleidyddol, ond ar yr un pryd, nad ydynt yn gallu arfer crebwyll mewn perthynas â materion fel defnyddio gwelyau haul neu dyllu eu tafodau, onid yw hynny'n creu anghysondeb? A allwch weld sut y gallai'r etholwyr feddwl bod agweddau Llywodraeth Cymru yn anghyson, gan ei bod yn ymddangos bod y ddwy agwedd yn groes i'w gilydd?
English: I think most people are aware that reaching the age of majority for different parts of social activity, whatever it happens to be, may happen at a slightly different age for different issues, and we're aware of that. A 16-year-old may be able to vote but they won't be able to drive. We're aware of these issues. What I'm looking at doing is doing something slightly different, and that is to invest in more cohesive communities, where people feel enfranchised and able to play a full part in ensuring that people have not just the right to vote and the ability to exercise that vote but also, of course, the knowledge and the capacity to be able to participate in political conversations and political debate about the future of those communities. I hope that we'll be able to go further and ensure that we then extend the ability to vote in all sorts of different ways, from electronic voting through to voting on different days, and ensuring that people, whoever they happen to be in our communities in Wales, are able to play a full part in determining the future of those communities.
Welsh: Credaf fod y rhan fwyaf o bobl yn ymwybodol y gallai cyrraedd llawn oed ar gyfer gwahanol fathau o weithgarwch cymdeithasol, beth bynnag y bo, ddigwydd ar oedran ychydig yn wahanol ar gyfer gwahanol faterion, ac rydym yn ymwybodol o hynny. Efallai y bydd unigolyn 16 oed yn gallu pleidleisio ond ni fydd yn gallu gyrru. Rydym yn ymwybodol o'r materion hyn. Yr hyn rwy'n gobeithio ei wneud yw gwneud rhywbeth ychydig yn wahanol, sef buddsoddi mewn cymunedau mwy cydlynus, lle mae pobl yn teimlo eu bod wedi eu hetholfreinio a'u bod yn gallu chwarae rhan lawn drwy sicrhau bod pobl nid yn unig yn cael yr hawl i bleidleisio a'r gallu i fwrw'r bleidlais honno, ond hefyd, wrth gwrs, eu bod yn cael y wybodaeth a'r gallu i allu cymryd rhan mewn sgyrsiau gwleidyddol a dadleuon gwleidyddol ynghylch dyfodol y cymunedau hynny. Rwy'n gobeithio y gallwn fynd ymhellach a sicrhau wedyn ein bod yn ymestyn y gallu i bleidleisio mewn pob math o ffyrdd gwahanol, o bleidleisio electronig i bleidleisio ar wahanol ddyddiau, a sicrhau bod pobl, waeth pwy ydynt yn ein cymunedau yng Nghymru, yn gallu chwarae rhan lawn yn y broses o benderfynu ar ddyfodol y cymunedau hynny.
English: Yes, you raised the important point there that people need the knowledge. If you're going to give them the responsibility of voting, they need the knowledge, and I think that that is a crucial point. Now, you said in your statement that: 'Within schools, the active citizenship theme of personal and social education will provide young people with an understanding of politics and the right to vote.' That's the end of your quote. Now, it has been raised recently by young campaigners - who actually support what you're doing and who actually want the vote to be extended to 16 and 17-year-olds - that many of them feel that what they have in schools at the moment in the active citizenship theme, which you alluded to, isn't actually sufficient to give them that political knowledge. So, I wondered were you seeking to change that element of the national curriculum in Wales, working with the education Minister, or does your statement actually indicate that you think that the education system at the moment does provide 16 and 17-year-olds with that knowledge?
Welsh: Ie, fe nodoch y pwynt pwysig fod angen y wybodaeth ar bobl. Os ydych am roi'r cyfrifoldeb o bleidleisio iddynt, mae angen y wybodaeth arnynt, a chredaf fod hwnnw'n bwynt hollbwysig. Nawr, fe ddywedoch chi yn eich datganiad: 'Mewn ysgolion, bydd y thema dinasyddiaeth weithgar mewn addysg bersonol a chymdeithasol yn rhoi dealltwriaeth i bobl ifanc o wleidyddiaeth a'r hawl i bleidleisio.' Dyna ddiwedd eich dyfyniad. Nawr, yn ddiweddar, mae ymgyrchwyr ifanc - sy'n cefnogi'r hyn rydych yn ei wneud ac sy'n awyddus i'r bleidlais gael ei hymestyn i bobl 16 a 17 oed - wedi dweud bod llawer ohonynt yn teimlo nad yw'r hyn sydd ganddynt mewn ysgolion ar hyn o bryd o ran y thema dinasyddiaeth weithgar, y cyfeirioch chi ati, yn ddigonol mewn gwirionedd ar gyfer rhoi'r wybodaeth wleidyddol honno iddynt. Felly, tybed a oeddech yn gobeithio newid yr elfen honno o'r cwricwlwm cenedlaethol yng Nghymru, gan weithio gyda'r Gweinidog addysg, neu a yw eich datganiad yn nodi eich bod yn credu bod y system addysg yn darparu'r wybodaeth honno i bobl 16 a 17 oed ar hyn o bryd?