English: We know that uncertainty is bad for business, which in itself is a condemnation of the way the referendum was held, without homework having been done, because it was inevitable that it was going to take years to resolve Brexit. Yes, there has been a slippage to the original timetable, but there was going to be a period of years anyway, so it was inevitable that that period of uncertainty, as the Minister has said, would lead to the kind of delayed investments that we've seen harming the Welsh economy - a reduction in inward investment and so on. And I think, as we look to the potential of a 'no deal' Brexit, and, certainly, changes then to an acute period of potential disaster for some businesses in Wales - . I've spoken in this Chamber many times about the mussels exporters exporting 97 per cent of their produce live and needing to get it through to continental Europe within 17 hours of getting them out of the sea. That's the kind of sector that just can't cope with any delay, however limited, at ports. And I'm thinking of other businesses in my constituency that are exporters to the European Union who will become less competitive, because of either practical issues of the ability of getting their products to market or tariff issues that perhaps makes them uncompetitive, and these are very real problems that my constituents face. The Minister referred to the funding - £0.5 billion available through the Development Bank of Wales across various funds accessible to small and medium-sized businesses. I wonder if you could explain what measures are being put in place to allow emergency access as a safety net to businesses that really do find themselves hitting the buffers, in terms of lost sales, and lost exports perhaps, if we do leave without a deal. We sometimes forget, and it's worth reminding ourselves, that Wales is a net exporter to the European Union, and it's a reminder that we need to bear in mind Wales's specific circumstances when we discuss Brexit. I fear that the debate that was had in those brief months in 2016 was largely an English question. Other areas that were asked the question considered, 'What does it mean for us?' Gibraltar were asked exactly the same question as Wales, and they voted 95 per cent to remain, because they could see, 'Hold on, this is clearly, clearly, bad for Gibraltar.' Unfortunately, I think the Welsh issue got mixed up with English questions, but I digress somewhat. On transport, I am pleased to hear that preparations have been made to ensure ease of passage for vehicles across the A55 after 31 October, and that roadworks will be cleared to make sure that there aren't any additional obstacles for increased traffic volumes or for the problems that the traffic will encounter on the way to Holyhead. Perhaps you could give us a little bit more detail on the steps that are being taken, though, in your words, to minimise the impact of disruption at the port of Holyhead on local traffic specifically. Because we know capacity in Holyhead is around 600 lorries; there are plans that have been explained to us, previously, to have a couple of extra places available to increase that to around 1,000 heavy goods vehicles, but there is potential of problems within the locality of the port that has traffic problems as it is. So, I would be grateful for some more detail on that. Also, although Downing Street's latest proposals on the Irish border question have been described as a non-starter by most people involved in those discussions, what consideration has Welsh Government given to the effect on movement of trade of those latest ideas on how to deal with the border on the island of Ireland, and how that could have an impact on us in Wales?
Welsh: Gwyddom fod ansicrwydd yn ddrwg i fusnes, sydd ynddo'i hun yn gondemniad o'r ffordd y cynhaliwyd y refferendwm, heb fod y gwaith cartref wedi'i wneud, oherwydd roedd hi'n anorfod y byddai'n cymryd blynyddoedd i ddatrys Brexit. Do, bu llithro o ran yr amserlen wreiddiol, ond byddai'n gyfnod o flynyddoedd beth bynnag, felly roedd hi'n anorfod y byddai'r cyfnod hwnnw o ansicrwydd, fel y dywedodd y Gweinidog, yn arwain at ohirio buddsoddi yn y fath fodd ag yr ydym ni wedi'i weld yn niweidio economi Cymru - gostyngiad mewn mewnfuddsoddi ac ati. Ac rwy'n credu, wrth i ni edrych ar bosibilrwydd Brexit heb gytundeb, ac, yn sicr, newidiadau wedyn i gyfnod dwys o drychineb posib i rai busnesau yng Nghymru - . Rwyf wedi siarad yn y Siambr hon droeon am yr allforwyr cregyn gleision yn allforio 97 y cant o'u cynnyrch yn fyw ac angen cael eu cynnyrch i gyfandir Ewrop o fewn 17 awr ar ôl eu codi o'r môr. Dyna'r math o sector na all ymdopi ag unrhyw oedi, pa mor fychan bynnag y bo, mewn porthladdoedd. Ac rwy'n meddwl am fusnesau eraill yn fy etholaeth sy'n allforio i'r Undeb Ewropeaidd a fydd yn llai cystadleuol, oherwydd naill ai materion ymarferol o ran gallu cael eu cynnyrch i'r farchnad neu faterion yn ymwneud â thariffau sydd efallai'n eu gwneud yn anghystadleuol, ac mae'r rhain yn broblemau real iawn y mae fy etholwyr yn eu hwynebu. Cyfeiriodd y Gweinidog at y cyllid - £0.5 biliwn ar gael drwy Banc Datblygu Cymru drwy'r cronfeydd amrywiol sydd ar gael i fusnesau bach a chanolig. Tybed a allech chi egluro pa fesurau sy'n cael eu rhoi ar waith fel rhwyd diogelwch fel y gall busnesau sydd mewn sefyllfa lle mae'r esgid yn wirioneddol wasgu gael arian ar fyrder, o ran colled mewn gwerthiannau, a cholli allforion efallai, os byddwn yn gadael heb gytundeb. Rydym ni weithiau'n anghofio, ac mae'n werth ein hatgoffa ein hunain, bod Cymru'n allforiwr net i'r Undeb Ewropeaidd, ac mae hynny'n ein hatgoffa bod angen i ni gadw mewn cof amgylchiadau penodol Cymru pan fyddwn ni'n trafod Brexit. Ofnaf mai cwestiwn Seisnig oedd y ddadl a gafwyd yn y misoedd byr hynny yn 2016 i raddau helaeth. Ystyriodd yr ardaloedd eraill y gofynnwyd y cwestiwn iddyn nhw, 'beth mae hyn yn ei olygu i ni?' Gofynnwyd yr un cwestiwn yn union i Gibraltar â Chymru, ac fe bleidleisiodd Gibraltar 95 y cant i aros, oherwydd gallent weld, 'Arhoswch funud, mae hyn yn hollol, hollol amlwg yn ddrwg i Gibraltar.' Yn anffodus, rwy'n credu y cymysgwyd mater Cymru ynghanol cwestiynau Seisnig, ond rwy'n crwydro braidd. O ran trafnidiaeth, rwy'n falch o glywed bod paratoadau wedi'u gwneud i sicrhau y gall cerbydau deithio ar hyd yr A55 yn ddi-rwystr ar ôl 31 Hydref, ac y caiff gwaith ffordd ei glirio i wneud yn siŵr nad oes unrhyw rwystrau ychwanegol i gynnydd yn y traffig neu i'r problemau y bydd y traffig yn eu hwynebu yng Nghaergybi. Efallai y gallech chi roi ychydig mwy o fanylion inni am yr hyn sy'n cael ei wneud, serch hynny, yn eich geiriau chi, i leihau effaith tarfu ar draffig lleol ym mhorthladd Caergybi yn benodol. Oherwydd rydym ni'n gwybod bod lle i 600 o lorïau yng Nghaergybi; mae cynlluniau wedi'u hegluro inni, o'r blaen, i gael ychydig o leoedd ychwanegol i gynyddu hynny i oddeutu 1,000 o gerbydau nwyddau trwm, ond mae posibilrwydd y bydd problemau yng nghyffiniau'r porthladd, lle mae problemau traffig eisoes. Felly, byddwn yn ddiolchgar o gael rhagor o fanylion am hynny. Hefyd, er bod cynigion diweddaraf Downing Street ar y cwestiwn ynghylch ffiniau Iwerddon wedi eu disgrifio gan y rhan fwyaf o bobl a fu'n rhan o'r trafodaethau hynny fel rhai cwbl ddiffygiol, pa ystyriaeth y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi'i rhoi i effaith y syniadau diweddaraf hynny ar lif masnach a sut i ymdrin â'r ffin ar Ynys Iwerddon, a sut y gallai hynny effeithio arnom ni yng Nghymru?