English: Diolch yn fawr. I'd like to thank you for the opportunity to discuss what is actually quite a complex Bill. It's quite difficult, I think - you're absolutely right - for the general public to be able to access this kind of debate. But you're absolutely right: these are important debates, and it is important that we get this right, because there are potential implications for us in the future. I think, really, what we need to remember is that what we're talking about in this LCM is the trade continuity Bill. What we're talking about are agreements that have been made between the EU and other nations around the world. We want some of those to continue, and, if that's the case, what we need are technical changes. We need the UK Government to be able to transfer those over. They have promised us that they're not going to make any changes; it'll just be technical in nature. That's what we're asking, this is not about future trade agreements, and we've made it absolutely clear that that is a different conversation, that we are having that conversation - it's actually quite constructive, and they are agreeing to some very profound changes in terms of the way that we interact with them in future. So, I think we mustn't get the LCM mixed up with future trade agreements. It's not perfect, because, actually, the constitution of the UK is not perfect. So, obviously, in particular at this time, we've got to be practical, I think, and understanding of the way things need to change. Of course I understand that the Assembly would want a role in scrutinising, and I think it's important that we look at ensuring that there's as much transparency as possible so that the Assembly can scrutinise what comes from the UK Government. The trade remedies authority is actually nothing to do with this LCM, but what's happened is that they've gone much, much further than they needed to. They've actually really interacted with us in an area that is not a devolved area of responsibility. But I would be more than happy to provide a written statement on where we've got on that. On the sunset clause that was referred to, there's been an agreement - and, yes, it was a despatch box agreement, but I think we've got to understand that there is a precedent for despatch box agreements being things that you should be able to count on, and that was given in terms of any extension to the sunset period being extended. Now, if this doesn't pass, despite the fact that, actually, the UK Government has done everything that we ask them to, I think we have to think about what the consequences of that would be. We are less likely to be able to influence in future. And what we're talking about at the moment, when we are in this constitutional flux as a result of coming out of the European Union, is that, actually, we need to build some trust up between all the different parts of the United Kingdom. And we are starting to prepare for a post-Brexit world, and if we were to reject this, their having made all those concessions, I think it would potentially diminish our opportunity to influence on important matters like trade deals for the future. The Sewel convention - we have to understand that, yes, of course, it is about 'not normally' legislating, but if this is going to work, and we understand the nature of the constitutional agreement on Sewel, then it's got to be one that is done on mutual respect, and it's got to be - an attempt for us to go against something where they've done everything we've asked them to do - . If we are to reject an LCM after they've done everything, then you've got to ask what does that relationship look like in future. I don't think we need everything on the face of the Bill. I think it's absolutely right that what we've got to here is a compromise where the UK Government has gone a very, very long way in our direction, and I do hope that this Assembly will be accepting the LCM later today.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr. Hoffwn i ddiolch i chi am y cyfle i drafod beth sydd mewn gwirionedd yn Fil eithaf cymhleth. Mae'n eithaf anodd, rwy'n credu - rydych chi'n hollol gywir - i'r cyhoedd gymryd rhan mewn dadl o'r fath. Ond rydych chi'n hollol gywir: Mae'r rhain yn ddadleuon pwysig, ac mae'n bwysig ein bod ni'n cael hyn yn iawn, oherwydd mae goblygiadau posibl i ni yn y dyfodol. Mewn gwirionedd, rwy'n credu mai'r hyn sydd angen i ni ei gofio mai'r hyn yr ydym ni'n sôn amdano yn y Cynnig Cydsyniad Deddfwriaethol hwn yw'r Bil parhad masnach. Yr hyn yr ydym yn sôn amdano yw'r cytundebau a wnaed rhwng yr UE a gwledydd eraill ledled y byd. Rydym eisiau i rai o'r rhain barhau, ac, os yw hynny'n wir, yr hyn sydd ei angen arnom yw newidiadau technegol. Mae angen arnom i Lywodraeth y DU allu trosglwyddo'r rhain drosodd i ni. Maen nhw wedi addo nad ydyn nhw'n mynd i wneud unrhyw newidiadau; dim ond technegol fydd eu natur. Dyna'r hyn yr ydym yn gofyn amdano, nid yw hyn yn ymwneud â chytundebau masnachol yn y dyfodol, ac rydym ni wedi'i wneud yn gwbl glir bod honno'n sgwrs wahanol, ein bod yn cael y sgwrs honno - mae'n eithaf adeiladol mewn gwirionedd, ac maen nhw yn cytuno i rai newidiadau dwys iawn o ran y ffordd y byddwn ni'n rhyngweithio â nhw yn y dyfodol. Felly, nid wyf i'n credu y dylem ni gymysgu'r Cynnig Cydsyniad Deddfwriaethol gyda chytundebau masnach yn y dyfodol. Nid yw'n berffaith, oherwydd, mewn gwirionedd, nid yw cyfansoddiad y DU yn berffaith. Felly, yn amlwg, yn enwedig ar hyn o bryd, credaf fod yn rhaid i ni fod yn ymarferol, a deall y ffordd y mae angen i bethau newid. Wrth gwrs, rwy'n deall y byddai'r Cynulliad eisiau swyddogaeth graffu, ac mae'n bwysig ein bod yn ystyried sicrhau bod cymaint o dryloywder â phosibl fel y gall y Cynulliad graffu ar beth sy'n dod oddi wrth Lywodraeth y DU. Mewn gwirionedd nid oes gan yr awdurdod rhwymedïau masnach ddim byd i'w wneud â'r Cynnig Cydsyniad Deddfwriaethol hwn, ond yr hyn sydd wedi digwydd, yw eu bod wedi mynd llawer, llawer iawn ymhellach nag oedd angen iddyn nhw ei wneud. Mewn gwirionedd, maen nhw wedi rhyngweithio â ni mewn maes cyfrifoldeb sydd wedi'i ddatganoli. Ond byddwn yn fwy na pharod i ddarparu datganiad ysgrifenedig ar ble yr ydym ni wedi cyrraedd ar hynny. O ran y cymal machlud y cyfeiriwyd ato, bu cytundeb ar hynny - ac ie, cytundeb blwch dogfennau oedd hwn, ond rwy'n credu bod yn rhaid i ni ddeall bod cynsail i gytundebau blwch dogfennau fel pethau y dylech chi allu dibynnu arnyn nhw, ac roedd hynny wedi ei gymryd yn ganiataol o ran unhyw estyniad i'r cyfnod machlud. Nawr, os nad yw hyn yn pasio, er gwaethaf y ffaith bod Llywodraeth y DU, mewn gwirionedd, wedi gwneud popeth yr ydym wedi ei ofyn iddyn nhw ei wneud, rwy'n credu bod angen i ni feddwl beth fyddai goblygiadau hynny. Mae'n llai tebygol y byddwn ni'n gallu dylanwadu yn y dyfodol. A'r hyn yr ydym ni'n sôn amdano ar hyn o bryd, pan ein bod yn y sefyllfa gyfansoddiadol ansefydlog hon o ganlyniad i ddod allan o'r Undeb Ewropeaidd, yw bod angen i ni, mewn gwirionedd, greu peth ymddiriedaeth rhwng holl wahanol rannau'r Deyrnas Unedig. Ac rydym ni'n dechrau paratoi ar gyfer byd ôl-Brexit a phe byddem ni'n gwrthod hyn, a hwythau wedi gwneud yr holl gonsesiynau hynny, rwy'n credu y byddai o bosibl yn lleihau ein cyfle i ddylanwadu ar faterion pwysig fel cytundebau masnach ar gyfer y dyfodol. Confensiwn Sewel - mae'n rhaid i ni ddeall, ydy, wrth gwrs, ei fod yn ymwneud â deddfu 'nid fel arfer', ond os yw hyn yn mynd i weithio, ac rydym ni'n deall natur y cytundeb cyfansoddiadol ar Sewel, yna mae'n rhaid iddo fod yn un sydd wedi'i seilio ar barch o'r ddwy ochr, ac mae'n rhaid iddo fod - yn ymgais i ni fynd yn erbyn rhywbeth pan eu bod nhw wedi gwneud popeth yr ydym ni wedi gofyn iddyn nhw ei wneud - . Os ydym ni'n mynd i wrthod Cynnig Cydsyniad Deddfwriaethol ar ôl iddyn nhw wneud popeth, yna mae'n rhaid i chi ofyn sut olwg fydd ar y berthynas honno yn y dyfodol. Nid wyf i'n credu bod angen i ni gael popeth ar wyneb y Bil. Rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n hollol lawn mai'r hyn sydd gennym ni yn y fan yma yw cyfaddawd lle mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi mynd yn bell iawn, i awn i'n cyfeiriad ni, ac rwy'n gobeithio y bydd y Cynulliad hwn yn derbyn y Cynnig Cydsyniad Deddfwriaethol yn ddiweddarach heddiw.