English: I underestimated the amount with my 41 per cent, so I'm sure 45 per cent is more accurate. But leaving aside the reasons, some of which you detailed in terms of how the European funding works, that is still only 45 per cent at this juncture and I know that it's not just me with concerns about this; I know that members of the farming community have also expressed concerns. With Brexit well under way many farmers have been holding off from making investment decisions, so funding such as RDP has had an important role to play in keeping farming sustainable. Many farmers, Minister, and many in our rural communities feel that an opportunity has been lost here. I appreciate that it might have been lost in other parts of the world as well, but they certainly feel that the opportunity has been lost and that the focus has been taken off that transformational change part of the agenda, which was there early on. It certainly seems to have been watered down by modifications to the plan and changes to the co-financing obligation that were there at the outset. If you look at sustainable production grants, they appear to have been oversubscribed, and there's been a lack of SPG windows. Given that farming is the backbone of the Welsh economy and a huge part of our cultural identity here in Wales, and so important to the large part of Wales that's in our large rural areas, do you agree that the Welsh Government must now take the opportunity, get back to that message of delivering transformational change for our farming industry, do this as a matter of urgency, so that Welsh farmers and those in our rural communities can be confident of the sustainability of their industry in the future?
Welsh: Fe wneuthum danamcangyfrif y ffigur wrth ddweud 41 y cant, felly rwy'n siŵr fod 45 y cant yn fwy cywir. Ond gan roi'r rhesymau i'r naill ochr, ac fe fanyloch chi ar rai ohonynt o ran sut y mae'r cyllid Ewropeaidd yn gweithio, 45 y cant yn unig yw'r ffigur o hyd, a gwn nad fi yw'r unig un sy'n pryderu am hyn; gwn fod aelodau o'r gymuned ffermio hefyd wedi mynegi pryderon. Gyda Brexit ar y gweill, mae llawer o ffermwyr wedi bod yn ymatal rhag gwneud penderfyniadau buddsoddi, felly mae cyllid fel y rhaglen datblygu gwledig wedi chwarae rhan bwysig yn sicrhau bod ffermio'n parhau i fod yn gynaliadwy. Mae llawer o ffermwyr, Weinidog, a llawer o bobl yn ein cymunedau gwledig yn teimlo bod cyfle wedi'i golli yma. Rwy'n derbyn y gallai fod wedi'i golli mewn rhannau eraill o'r byd hefyd, ond maent yn sicr yn teimlo bod y cyfle wedi'i golli a bod y ffocws wedi'i dynnu oddi ar y rhan honno o'r agenda sy'n ymwneud â newid trawsffurfiol, a oedd yno ar y cychwyn. Yn sicr, ymddengys ei fod wedi'i lastwreiddio gan addasiadau i'r cynllun a newidiadau i'r rhwymedigaeth gydgyllido a oedd yno ar y cychwyn. Os edrychwch ar grantiau cynhyrchu cynaliadwy, ymddengys eu bod wedi eu gorgyflenwi, a gwelwyd diffyg cyfleoedd i ymgeisio am y grant cynhyrchu cynaliadwy. O ystyried mai ffermio yw asgwrn cefn economi Cymru a rhan enfawr o'n hunaniaeth ddiwylliannol yma yng Nghymru, a'i fod mor bwysig i'r rhan fawr o Gymru sydd yn ein hardaloedd gwledig mawr, a ydych yn cytuno bod yn rhaid i Lywodraeth Cymru achub ar y cyfle yn awr i ddychwelyd at y neges honno o sicrhau newid trawsffurfiol i'n diwydiant ffermio, gwneud hyn ar frys, fel y gall ffermwyr Cymru a'r bobl yn ein cymunedau gwledig fod yn hyderus o gynaliadwyedd eu diwydiant yn y dyfodol?