English: When we do publish the NHS recovery plan, we will within it address the fact that there will be a resource requirement for this not just in a year, but over the course of the whole term. I've indicated previously that I think the recovery will take least a full Senedd term. That's the scale of the problem we have. It's probably not much comfort to people here in Wales, but you'll find a huge scale of challenge in every part of UK, because of the last year that we've all lived through. I recognise the point the Member makes about not just the increase in the volume and the backlog that's been built up, but the fact that that may mean that there is harm that is caused that may not be reversible. That is part of the difficulty in having to make choices through this pandemic and about weighing up and balancing the impact on different people. I should say, though, that it isn't the case that one in five people in Wales are on a waiting list. A number of the people who are waiting will have appointments on different lists, and it's part of the challenge in having an accurate discussion about the scale. The numbers the Member quotes are the numbers of outstanding appointments in a variety of areas, as she's indicated, from out-patients to more urgent activity as well. That reinforces for me the importance of continuing to get on top of coronavirus and not letting the virus get out of control again, because it would just mean a further interruption and even more harm and an even bigger backlog. But yes, you can expect a plan that covers a range of different areas, including a balance between local, regional and national choices. I may not be the Minister who has to make those national choices, but whoever does return as the health Minister after the election in May will need to be prepared to make national choices to build upon the plan that will be published by the end of March, because this, as I say, is going to be a significant undertaking for the whole country.
Welsh: Pan fyddwn yn cyhoeddi cynllun adfer y GIG, byddwn yn mynd i'r afael o'i fewn â'r ffaith y bydd angen adnoddau ar gyfer hyn nid yn unig mewn blwyddyn, ond dros y tymor cyfan. Rwyf wedi nodi o'r blaen fy mod yn credu y bydd yr adferiad yn cymryd tymor seneddol llawn fan lleiaf. Dyna faint y broblem sydd gennym. Mae'n debyg nad yw'n llawer o gysur i bobl yma yng Nghymru, ond fe welwch raddfa enfawr yr her ym mhob rhan o'r DU, oherwydd y flwyddyn ddiwethaf rydym i gyd wedi byw drwyddi. Rwy'n cydnabod y pwynt y mae'r Aelod yn ei wneud nid yn unig am y cynnydd yn y niferoedd a'r ôl-groniad sydd wedi datblygu, ond y ffaith y gallai hynny olygu fod niwed na ellir ei wrthdroi yn cael ei achosi. Mae hynny'n rhan o'r anhawster o orfod gwneud dewisiadau drwy'r pandemig hwn ac am bwyso a mesur a chydbwyso'r effaith ar wahanol bobl. Fodd bynnag, dylwn ddweud nad yw'n wir fod un o bob pump o bobl Cymru ar restr aros. Bydd nifer o'r bobl sy'n aros yn cael apwyntiadau ar wahanol restrau, ac mae'n rhan o'r her o gael trafodaeth gywir am y raddfa. Y niferoedd y mae'r Aelod yn eu dyfynnu yw nifer yr apwyntiadau sydd eto i'w cynnal mewn amrywiaeth o feysydd, fel y nodwyd ganddi, o gleifion allanol i weithgaredd mwy difrifol hefyd. I mi, mae hynny'n atgyfnerthu pwysigrwydd parhau i ymladd y coronafeirws a pheidio â cholli rheolaeth ar y feirws eto, oherwydd byddai hynny'n golygu aflonyddu pellach a mwy fyth o niwed ac ôl-groniad. Ond fe allwch ddisgwyl cynllun sy'n cwmpasu amrywiaeth o wahanol feysydd, gan gynnwys cydbwysedd rhwng dewisiadau lleol, rhanbarthol a chenedlaethol. Efallai nad fi fydd y Gweinidog sy'n gorfod gwneud y dewisiadau cenedlaethol hynny, ond bydd angen i bwy bynnag sy'n dychwelyd fel Gweinidog iechyd ar ôl yr etholiad ym mis Mai fod yn barod i wneud dewisiadau cenedlaethol i adeiladu ar y cynllun a gyhoeddir erbyn diwedd mis Mawrth, oherwydd bydd hyn, fel y dywedais, yn ymrwymiad sylweddol i'r wlad gyfan.