English: Yes, and that money was hard won by years of negotiations on the part of the Welsh Government, which Mark Drakeford led on. Moving back to the issue of the consistent underinvestment by the UK Government in non-devolved areas in Wales, between 2011 and 2016, the Welsh Government contributed around £362 million to wider public sector spending on Welsh railways. We also invested over £220 million in rail infrastructure enhancement, including funding from EU structural funds. And during the same period, the UK Government chose to invest just £198 million on enhancing the network in Wales - proof, I think, that their priorities lay elsewhere. Through Superfast Cymru, a total of nearly £230 million of public funding has been invested in providing access to superfast broadband to 733,000 homes and businesses, and let's be clear: these are homes and businesses that would not otherwise be able to access broadband. A hundred and forty six million pounds was invested from Welsh Government and EU funding support, while only £67 million of that was provided by the UK Government. Llywydd, this is major funding that could have been spent on devolved services, but we have been forced to step in where the UK Government has refused to fulfil its responsibilities. Turning to this year's UK spending round, let me briefly summarise what it means for our budget. But, before I do, I will address the point that I believe Nick Ramsay made in terms of wishing to see a longer-term investment and a longer-term profile for spending. Well, that's something that we obviously share in Welsh Government but, unfortunately, despite being promised a three-year comprehensive spending review, we were just offered a one-year spending round that doesn't even give us the confidence of future spending that some departments in the UK Government have. In our 2021 budget, it will be 2 per cent or £300 million lower in real terms than compared to 2010-11. And, of course, there's the impact of the UK Treasury's choice to play fast and loose with the agreed rules that we have on funding allocations. This year, that approach delivered a £35 million shortfall for our budget following the failure of the UK Government to fully fund increased public sector pensions. I have to say that that shortfall rises to around £50 million next year, so that's £50 million that I'm not able to put into schools and classrooms in Wales; it's £50 million that doesn't go to the health service; it's £50 million that can't go almost halfway to meeting the identified spend that Angela Burns would like to see in terms of introducing more nurses to Wales. So, that's all money that can't be spent in Wales because we've been shortchanged by the UK Government. The pitiful outcome of a decade of austerity should be a source of deep embarrassment to the Welsh Conservatives, and we'll take no lessons from the UK Government when it comes to investing in health and education. Spending per person on health and social services here in Wales stands at more than £3,000, and that's the highest of the four UK countries. Spending per person on education in Wales was more than £1,300, and that's 6 per cent higher than in England. Within the straitjacket of a decade of austerity, we continue to invest in the public services where there is greatest need. We've committed in our manifesto, and I have to say -
Welsh: Ie, ac enillwyd yr arian hwnnw drwy flynyddoedd caled o negodiadau ar ran Llywodraeth Cymru dan arweiniad Mark Drakeford. I droi'n ôl at fater y tanfuddsoddi cyson gan Lywodraeth y DU mewn meysydd sydd heb eu datganoli yng Nghymru, rhwng 2011 a 2016, cyfrannodd Llywodraeth Cymru tua £362 miliwn tuag at wariant sector cyhoeddus ehangach ar reilffyrdd Cymru. Buddsoddwyd dros £220 miliwn gennym hefyd i wella'r seilwaith rheilffyrdd, gan gynnwys cyllid o gronfeydd strwythurol yr UE. Ac yn ystod yr un cyfnod, dewisodd Llywodraeth y DU fuddsoddi £198 miliwn yn unig ar wella'r rhwydwaith yng Nghymru - prawf, rwy'n credu, fod eu blaenoriaethau mewn mannau eraill. Drwy Cyflymu Cymru, mae cyfanswm o bron i £230 miliwn o arian cyhoeddus wedi'i fuddsoddi i ddarparu mynediad i fand eang cyflym iawn i 733,000 o gartrefi a busnesau, a gadewch i ni fod yn glir: cartrefi a busnesau yw'r rhain na fyddent fel arall yn gallu cael mynediad at fand eang. Buddsoddwyd £146 miliwn o gymorth ariannol gan Lywodraeth Cymru a'r UE, a dim ond £67 miliwn ohono a ddarparwyd gan Lywodraeth y DU. Lywydd, dyma gyllid pwysig y gellid bod wedi ei wario ar wasanaethau datganoledig, ond cawsom ein gorfodi i gamu i mewn lle mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi gwrthod cyflawni ei chyfrifoldebau. Gan droi at gylch gwariant y DU eleni, gadewch imi roi crynodeb byr o'r hyn y mae'n ei olygu i'n cyllideb. Ond cyn i mi wneud hynny, rhoddaf sylw i'r pwynt y credaf fod Nick Ramsay wedi ei wneud o ran dymuno gweld buddsoddiad mwy hirdymor a phroffil gwariant mwy hirdymor. Wel, mae hynny'n rhywbeth rydym yn amlwg yn ei rannu yn Llywodraeth Cymru ond yn anffodus, er inni gael addewid o adolygiad cynhwysfawr o wariant dros dair blynedd, cawsom gynnig cylch gwariant un flwyddyn nad yw hyd yn oed yn rhoi hyder i ni ynglŷn â gwariant yn y dyfodol fel y mae rhai o adrannau Llywodraeth y DU yn ei gael. Yn ein cyllideb ar gyfer 2021, fe fydd 2 y cant neu £300 miliwn yn llai mewn termau real o gymharu â 2010-11. Ac wrth gwrs, ceir effaith dewis Trysorlys y DU i ymddwyn yn anghyfrifol gyda'r rheolau cytunedig sydd gennym ar ddyraniadau cyllid. Eleni, arweiniodd yr ymagwedd honno at ddiffyg o £35 miliwn yn ein cyllideb yn dilyn methiant Llywodraeth y DU i ariannu'n llawn y cynnydd ym mhensiynau'r sector cyhoeddus. Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud bod y diffyg hwnnw'n codi i tua £50 miliwn y flwyddyn nesaf, felly dyna £50 miliwn nad wyf yn gallu ei roi tuag at ysgolion ac ystafelloedd dosbarth yng Nghymru; mae'n £50 miliwn nad yw'n mynd i'r gwasanaeth iechyd; mae'n £50 miliwn na all fynd bron hanner ffordd tuag at y gwariant y byddai Angela Burns yn hoffi ei weld ar gyflwyno mwy o nyrsys i Gymru. Felly, dyna'r holl arian na ellir ei wario yng Nghymru am na chawsom ein cyfran deg gan Lywodraeth y DU. Dylai canlyniad truenus degawd o gyni fod yn destun embaras mawr i'r Ceidwadwyr Cymreig, ac nid ydym am dderbyn unrhyw wersi gan Lywodraeth y DU ar fuddsoddi mewn iechyd ac addysg. Mae gwariant y pen ar iechyd a gwasanaethau cymdeithasol yma yng Nghymru yn fwy na £3,000, a dyna'r swm uchaf ym mhedair gwlad y DU. Roedd gwariant y pen ar addysg yng Nghymru yn fwy na £1,300, sydd 6 y cant yn uwch nag yn Lloegr. Dan lyffethair degawd o gyni, rydym yn parhau i fuddsoddi yn y gwasanaethau cyhoeddus lle mae'r angen mwyaf. Rydym wedi ymrwymo yn ein maniffesto, ac mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud -