English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. Can I thank everyone for taking part and raising such thoughtful questions and really getting involved in this debate? Can I start with Jenny? You actually talked about the NHS requiring prudent healthcare and patients also being responsible enough to look after themselves as far as possible. And, do you know, I think that's a general model for what we need to do with democracy. Democracy cannot flourish if there isn't active citizen participation. I suppose what I'm saying is there's not enough at the moment for it fully to flourish in the twenty-first century. It's not on its knees, but we need, really, to have the sort of ambition that our ancestors had when they were making these extraordinary changes in the nineteenth century. The difficulty on voter registration does concern me deeply. I think we need to have the highest standards of scrutiny of any system for registration, and, if there are problems with the current arrangements, I think they need to be investigated fully. We need a system that is secure, but, as soon as we can establish that a person is a citizen and has a right to vote, there should be the minimum fuss then about registering them, and there should be many methods to do that. And voting over the weekend and at local supermarkets - all these things may be possible. Suzy said that much of what I talked about would be an alternative to referendums. I don't ban referendums altogether from this model, but I do agree that what we want is to get people to deliberate. What are the challenges? How do you trade them and prioritise? This is very important. I think, in terms of citizen service, we are probably going to see the need for a radical reform, perhaps even something along the lines of universal income, with more work-sharing also in the future. One thing we could do in that model is to emphasise the obligation we all have for citizen service. That might be a way of opening up some of these issues. Gareth talked about the workability. Well, you know, it is used in the legal system. It's absolutely at the heart. Clearly, people would have to be supported. Our own staff would be involved in that, the research facilities, for instance, the clerking teams - it would be part of the model. Would people be interested? Well, I think, if you look around the world where it's succeeded, and the Minister made reference to this, in Iceland, in Ireland, it's been transformative in getting to discuss some of the most basic questions. And look at the new democracies that have used this in a whole host of methods, including truth commissions - they've really got to the heart of some of these things by using a citizen-based approach. So, I'm very optimistic. The Minister said she's open to these ideas and I think that was reflected in her contribution. We need to close the gap between citizens and politicians. There are still essential things that institutions need to do and full-time politicians need to do, but we can enhance the digital possibilities and see a real chance for a new form of democracy, participative democracy, that is conducted on a much fuller and equal basis. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch, Ddirprwy Lywydd. A gaf fi ddiolch i bawb am gymryd rhan a chodi cwestiynau mor ystyriol a chymryd cymaint o ran yn y ddadl hon? A gaf fi ddechrau gyda Jenny? Mewn gwirionedd, fe sonioch fod y GIG angen gofal iechyd darbodus ac i'r cleifion hefyd fod yn ddigon cyfrifol i ofalu amdanynt eu hunain cyn belled ag y bo modd. Ac rwy'n credu bod hwnnw'n fodel cyffredinol, wyddoch chi, ar gyfer yr hyn sydd angen inni ei wneud gyda democratiaeth. Ni all democratiaeth ffynnu os nad oes cyfranogiad gweithgar gan ddinasyddion. Mae'n debyg mai'r hyn rwy'n ei ddweud yw nad oes digon ar hyn o bryd iddo allu ffynnu'n llawn yn yr unfed ganrif ar hugain. Nid yw ar ei liniau, ond mae angen inni gael y math o uchelgais a oedd gan ein hynafiaid mewn gwirionedd pan oeddent yn gwneud y newidiadau rhyfeddol hyn yn y bedwaredd ganrif ar bymtheg. Mae'r anhawster i gofrestru pleidleiswyr yn fy mhryderu'n fawr. Credaf fod angen inni gael y safonau uchaf wrth graffu ar unrhyw system gofrestru, ac os oes problemau gyda'r trefniadau presennol, credaf fod angen ymchwilio iddynt yn llawn. Mae arnom angen system sy'n ddiogel, ond cyn gynted ag y gallwn sefydlu bod person yn ddinesydd a chanddo hawl i bleidleisio, dylai fod cyn lleied â phosibl o ffwdan wedyn ynglŷn â'u cofrestru, a dylai fod llawer o ddulliau o wneud hynny. A phleidleisio dros y penwythnos ac mewn archfarchnadoedd lleol - efallai y bydd hyn oll yn bosibl. Dywedodd Suzy y byddai llawer o'r hyn y siaradais amdano yn ddewis arall yn lle refferenda. Nid wyf yn gwahardd refferenda yn gyfan gwbl o'r model hwn, ond rwy'n cytuno mai'r hyn rydym ei eisiau yw cael pobl i drafod. Beth yw'r heriau? Sut rydych yn eu trin ac yn blaenoriaethu arnynt? Mae hyn yn bwysig iawn. O ran gwasanaeth dinasyddion, mae'n fwy na thebyg y byddwn yn gweld yr angen am ddiwygio radical, rhywbeth tebyg i incwm cyffredinol efallai hyd yn oed, gyda mwy o rannu gwaith hefyd yn y dyfodol. Un peth y gallem ei wneud yn y model hwnnw yw pwysleisio'r ymrwymiad sydd gennym tuag at wasanaeth dinasyddion. Gallai honno fod yn ffordd o agor y ffordd i rai o'r materion hyn. Soniodd Gareth am ymarferoldeb. Wel, wyddoch chi, caiff ei ddefnyddio yn y system gyfreithiol. Mae'n gwbl ganolog iddi. Yn amlwg, byddai'n rhaid cefnogi pobl. Byddai ein staff ein hunain yn cymryd rhan yn hynny, y cyfleusterau ymchwil, er enghraifft, y timau clercio - byddai'n rhan o'r model. A fyddai diddordeb gan bobl? Wel, os edrychwch o gwmpas y byd lle mae wedi llwyddo, a chyfeiriodd y Gweinidog at hyn, yng Ngwlad yr Iâ, yn Iwerddon, rwy'n credu ei fod wedi bod yn drawsnewidiol wrth drafod rhai o'r cwestiynau mwyaf sylfaenol. Ac edrychwch ar y democratiaethau newydd sydd wedi defnyddio hyn mewn llu o ffyrdd, gan gynnwys comisiynau gwirionedd - maent wedi mynd at wraidd rhai o'r pethau hyn o ddifrif drwy ddefnyddio dull sy'n seiliedig ar y dinesydd. Felly, rwy'n optimistaidd iawn. Dywedodd y Gweinidog ei bod yn agored i'r syniadau hyn ac rwy'n credu bod hynny wedi'i adlewyrchu yn ei chyfraniad. Mae angen inni gau'r bwlch rhwng dinasyddion a gwleidyddion. Mae yna bethau hanfodol sydd angen i sefydliadau eu gwneud, ac sydd angen i wleidyddion amser llawn eu gwneud, ond gallwn wella'r posibiliadau digidol a gweld cyfle go iawn i gael math newydd o ddemocratiaeth, democratiaeth gyfranogol, a gyflawnir ar sail lawer llawnach a mwy cyfartal. Diolch.