English: I don't think Plaid Cymru are full of remainers entirely, either. Yes, I agree. The reason I'm willing to support this motion today, after much thought, is because of that point. We are at an impasse. The only other option to a second vote would be no deal, I think, at this point, and that is why I'm saying we probably do need to support this. By the way, one thing I'd say about Gareth Bennett - Neil Hamilton's gone and Gareth Bennett's not here - he's promising, in his pitch for the leadership of UKIP, that he will have a referendum in every parliamentary term. God forbid we end up in that position. What's going to be next? Capital punishment? Perhaps we'll have a referendum on that. There's a simple choice for you - there's no unintended consequences there. I think the problem is our democracy is broken. I haven't been a strong advocate of proportional representation in the past and I regret that, because I think the only way we're going to make a way forward in the future and enable us not to need referenda in the future is by having a properly proportional voting system at Westminster and in this Chamber, so that then we don't need referenda. Now, people in Plaid Cymru are nodding. I would also say, if you have that, and if you can command through a proportional system more than 50 per cent of the vote, you can put your core policy forward and ask for that to put forward. So, let's take Welsh independence. We won't need a referendum on Welsh independence if you can command 50 per cent of the Chamber to support it, and then put it forward in a further Assembly or Welsh Parliamentary election. We will never need a referendum ever again, and Llyr said -
Welsh: Nid wyf yn credu bod Plaid Cymru yn llawn o bobl sydd o blaid aros, chwaith. Ydw, rwy'n cytuno. Y rheswm pam rwy'n fodlon cefnogi'r cynnig hwn heddiw, ar ôl llawer o feddwl, yw oherwydd y pwynt hwnnw. Rydym mewn cyfyngder. Ar hyn o bryd yr unig opsiwn arall yn lle ail bleidlais fyddai dim bargen, rwy'n credu, a dyna pam rwy'n dweud bod angen i ni gefnogi hyn, mae'n debyg. Gyda llaw, un peth y buaswn yn ei ddweud am Gareth Bennett - mae Neil Hamilton wedi mynd ac nid yw Gareth Bennett yma - mae'n addo, yn ei gais am arweinyddiaeth UKIP, y bydd yn cael refferendwm ym mhob tymor seneddol. Duw a'n gwaredo os cawn ein hunain yn y sefyllfa honno. Beth sy'n mynd i fod nesaf? Y gosb eithaf? Efallai y cawn refferendwm ar hynny. Dyna ddewis syml i chi - nid oes unrhyw ganlyniadau anfwriadol yno. Credaf mai'r broblem yw bod ein democratiaeth wedi torri. Nid wyf wedi bod yn gryf o blaid cynrychiolaeth gyfrannol yn y gorffennol ac rwy'n edifar am hynny, oherwydd rwy'n credu mai'r unig ffordd y gallwn gamu ymlaen yn y dyfodol a'n galluogi i beidio â bod angen refferenda yn y dyfodol yw drwy gael system bleidleisio gyfrannol briodol yn San Steffan ac yn y Siambr hon, felly, ni fydd angen refferenda arnom wedyn. Nawr, mae pobl ym Mhlaid Cymru yn cytuno. Buaswn yn dweud hefyd, os cewch chi hynny, ac os gallwch gael mwy na 50 y cant o'r bleidlais drwy system gyfrannol, gallwch gyflwyno eich polisi craidd a gofyn am i hynny gael ei gyflwyno. Felly, beth am edrych ar annibyniaeth i Gymru. Ni fydd arnom angen refferendwm ar annibyniaeth Cymru os gallwch gael 50 y cant o'r Siambr i'w gefnogi, ac yna ei gyflwyno mewn etholiad Cynulliad arall neu mewn etholiadau Seneddol Cymreig. Ni fydd angen refferendwm byth eto, a dywedodd Llyr -