English: Thank you for that answer. I was hoping you might give me a little bit more on that, but that leaves me more questions to ask. We've just heard, via the press, just about quarter of an hour ago, actually, that the substantial sum seems to have been identified at somewhere between £100 million and £200 million. I'm wondering if you could confirm that in your reply to this, but, if it is at those figures, that is a substantial sum - not exactly down-the-back-of-the-sofa material. Perhaps you could tell us where you're likely to be getting that kind of money from, if, as Plaid Cymru suggests, your capital borrowing pot, if you like, is pretty much committed to the M4. So, perhaps you can give us some clarity on the type of figure that you're considering and where that money will be coming from. And that is material, because the - . If I read from the letter correctly, 'This investment could help to reduce the cost of capital for the project and hence reduce the subsidy requirement over the lifetime of any contract for difference.' So, with such a figure, we'd need some reassurance that it would actually be likely to make a difference to the strike price and the term of the deal. So, what assessment have you done to determine the effect of the capital that you're likely to be able to put in on the strike price and the length of the repayment deal? And then, finally, on what disclosable terms are you at this stage able to say that you would like to see any such loan or equity deal being made? We already know that the loan taken up by the company - I think from 2015 - is unsecured. And, while I don't want anyone to be in any doubt about my support for this, for the tidal lagoon, we've also got a duty to constituents to make sure that any investment is adequately protected. So, if you are able to give us some sort of indication of the protection that you would wish for Welsh investors - sorry, the Welsh Government - on behalf of the public in Wales, what kind of protection would you be looking for in any further deal?
Welsh: Diolch i chi am yr ateb hwnnw. Roeddwn yn gobeithio efallai y byddech yn rhoi ychydig mwy i mi ar hynny, ond mae'n gadael mwy o gwestiynau i'w gofyn. Rydym newydd glywed, drwy'r wasg, tua chwarter awr yn ôl mewn gwirionedd, ei bod yn ymddangos bod y swm sylweddol rywle rhwng £100 miliwn a £200 miliwn. Tybed a allech gadarnhau hynny yn eich ateb i'r cwestiwn hwn, ond os yw'r ffigurau hynny'n gywir, mae hwnnw'n swm sylweddol - nid arian y gallech ddod o hyd iddo i lawr cefn y soffa. Efallai y gallech ddweud wrthym o ble rydych yn debygol o gael y math hwnnw o arian, os yw eich pot benthyca cyfalaf, os mynnwch, fel y mae Plaid Cymru yn ei awgrymu, wedi'i ymrwymo fwy neu lai ar gyfer yr M4. Felly, efallai y gallwch egluro'r math o ffigur rydych yn ei ystyried ac o ble y daw'r arian hwnnw. Ac mae hynny'n berthnasol, oherwydd mae - . Os darllenais y llythyr yn gywir, Gallai'r buddsoddiad hwn helpu i leihau cost cyfalaf y prosiect a lleihau'r gofyn felly am gymhorthdal dros oes unrhyw gontract gwahaniaeth. Felly, gyda ffigur o'r fath, byddem angen rhywfaint o sicrwydd y byddai, mewn gwirionedd, yn debygol o wneud gwahaniaeth i'r pris streic a thymor y cytundeb. Felly, pa asesiad a wnaethoch i bennu effaith y cyfalaf rydych yn debygol o allu ei roi i mewn ar y pris streic a hyd y cytundeb ad-dalu? Ac yn olaf, ar ba delerau datgeladwy y gallwch ddweud ar y pwynt hwn y byddech yn hoffi gweld benthyciad neu gytundeb ecwiti yn cael ei wneud? Rydym eisoes yn gwybod bod y benthyciad a gafodd y cwmni - yn 2015 rwy'n credu - yn ddiwarant. Ac er nad wyf eisiau i neb fod ag unrhyw amheuaeth ynglŷn â fy nghefnogaeth i hyn, i'r morlyn llanw, mae gennym ddyletswydd i etholwyr hefyd i wneud yn siŵr fod unrhyw fuddsoddiad wedi ei ddiogelu'n ddigonol. Felly, os gallwch roi rhyw fath o syniad o'r diogelwch y byddech yn ei ddymuno i fuddsoddwyr Cymru - mae'n ddrwg gennyf, i Lywodraeth Cymru - ar ran y cyhoedd yng Nghymru, pa fath o ddiogelwch y byddech yn chwilio amdano mewn unrhyw gytundeb pellach?