techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: The answer to the question is 'yes'. That's what we want to do. We're looking at the detail of how that can be done, but we want to make sure that the same service is on offer in Wales as it is in England and Scotland. There are issues such as, for example, travel costs, and issues such as how you provide ongoing care for a procedure, rather than people just going home. These things are being considered at the moment, but I can assure the leader of Plaid Cymru that what we're looking to do is to make sure that Wales, England and Scotland offer the same service.
Welsh: Yr ateb i'r cwestiwn yw 'bydd'. Dyna'r hyn yr ydym ni eisiau ei wneud. Rydym ni'n edrych ar fanylion sut y gellir gwneud hynny, ond rydym ni eisiau gwneud yn siŵr bod yr un gwasanaeth yn cael ei gynnig yng Nghymru ag a gynigir yn Lloegr a'r Alban. Ceir materion fel, er enghraifft, costau teithio, a materion fel sut yr ydych chi'n darparu gofal parhaus ar gyfer triniaeth, yn hytrach na phobl ddim ond yn mynd adref. Mae'r pethau hyn yn cael eu hystyried ar hyn o bryd, ond gallaf sicrhau arweinydd Plaid Cymru mai'r yr hyn yr ydym ni'n ceisio ei wneud yw sicrhau bod Cymru, Lloegr a'r Alban yn cynnig yr un gwasanaeth.
English: I welcome your answer, First Minister, so thank you very much for that. Faced with this Westminster Government that is committed to austerity, Wales needs a Government now that is proactive on health. Almost 30,000 Welsh nurses have seen a 14 per cent cut in their wages since 2010 due to the NHS pay cap. On page 56 of your manifesto, you say that you will scrap the NHS pay cap. The Scottish Government has announced that it'll get rid of the pay cap in its next budget. All I've seen from the Welsh Government is a letter to Jeremy Hunt. The UK Government has effectively rejected that letter and is now committed to that pay cap. It's time now, First Minister, for you to take action. Why haven't you yet announced any plans to lift the pay cap and will you make it a priority in your next budget?
Welsh: Rwy'n croesawu eich ateb, Prif Weinidog, felly diolch yn fawr iawn am hynny. Wrth wynebu'r Llywodraeth hon yn San Steffan sydd wedi ymrwymo i gyni ariannol, mae angen Llywodraeth ar Gymru nawr sy'n rhagweithiol o ran iechyd. Mae bron i 30,000 o nyrsys yng Nghymru wedi gweld toriad o 14 y cant i'w cyflogau ers 2010 oherwydd cap cyflog y GIG. Ar dudalen 56 eich maniffesto, rydych chi'n dweud y byddwch chi'n cael gwared ar gap cyflog y GIG. Mae Llywodraeth yr Alban wedi cyhoeddi y bydd yn cael gwared ar y cap cyflog yn ei chyllideb nesaf. Y cwbl yr wyf i wedi ei weld gan Lywodraeth Cymru yw llythyr at Jeremy Hunt. Mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi gwrthod y llythyr hwnnw i bob pwrpas ac mae bellach wedi ymrwymo i'r cap cyflog hwnnw. Mae'n bryd nawr, Prif Weinidog, i chi weithredu. Pam nad ydych wedi cyhoeddi unrhyw gynlluniau eto i gael gwared ar y cap cyflog ac a fyddwch chi'n gwneud hynny yn flaenoriaeth yn eich cyllideb nesaf?
English: We want to lift the pay cap. There are financial implications that we believe should be met by the Westminster Government. I don't know what their view is, if I'm honest with the leader of Plaid Cymru, on the pay cap. I've heard different views from different Ministers at different times. It shows the lack of leadership that exists in Westminster. She and I are in exactly the same position in wanting to see an end to the pay cap. We will continue to press the UK Government for more resources and we will consider what we can do financially in order to move forward with that.
Welsh: Rydym ni eisiau cael gwared ar y cap cyflog. Mae goblygiadau ariannol y credwn y dylent gael eu bodloni gan Lywodraeth San Steffan. Nid wyf yn gwybod beth yw eu barn nhw, i fod yn onest ag arweinydd Plaid Cymru, ar y cap cyflog. Rwyf wedi clywed gwahanol safbwyntiau gan wahanol Weinidogion ar wahanol adegau. Mae'n dangos y diffyg arweinyddiaeth sy'n bodoli yn San Steffan. Mae hi a minnau yn yr un sefyllfa'n union o ran bod eisiau gweld diwedd ar y cap cyflog. Byddwn yn parhau i bwyso ar Lywodraeth y DU am fwy o adnoddau a byddwn yn ystyried yr hyn y gallwn ei wneud yn ariannol er mwyn bwrw ymlaen â hynny.
English: If it's that much of a priority, First Minister, you should be able to commit to this today. We've got a Labour Government in Wales, we've got 28 Welsh Labour MPs, and the NHS pay cap still remains. You might be happy to blame others in terms of the Westminster budgetary constraints, but you could be taking action today to protect workers, NHS nurses and NHS staff in Wales. The whole point of devolution is to pursue a different way, a better way, and you could have made a clear commitment today to look at where that funding could come from in the next budget. So, your lack of action begs the question: what is the point of Labour if you're not able to protect Welsh workers? First Minister - [Interruption.]
Welsh: Os yw'n gymaint â hynny o flaenoriaeth, Prif Weinidog, dylech chi allu ymrwymo i hyn heddiw. Mae gennym ni Lywodraeth Lafur yng Nghymru, mae gennym ni 28 o ASau Llafur Cymru, ac mae cap cyflog y GIG yn dal i fodoli. Efallai eich bod chi'n hapus i feio eraill o ran cyfyngiadau cyllidebol San Steffan, ond gallech chi fod yn cymryd camau heddiw i ddiogelu gweithwyr, nyrsys y GIG a staff y GIG yng Nghymru. Holl bwynt datganoli yw dilyn gwahanol drywydd, trywydd gwell, a gallech chi fod wedi gwneud ymrwymiad eglur heddiw i ystyried o ble y gallai'r arian hwnnw ddod yn y gyllideb nesaf. Felly, mae eich diffyg gweithredu yn codi'r cwestiwn: beth yw diben y Blaid Lafur os nad ydych chi'n gallu amddiffyn gweithwyr Cymru? Prif Weinidog - [Torri ar draws.]
English: Can I please hear the leader of Plaid Cymru and can I hear less of Ministers in the Government? Allow the First Minister to hear the questions.
Welsh: A gaf i glywed arweinydd Plaid Cymru os gwelwch yn dda, ac a gaf i glywed llai ar Weinidogion yn y Llywodraeth? Gadewch i'r Prif Weinidog glywed y cwestiynau.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. I'll give you one more chance to come clean on this now: do you have any regrets about implementing Tory austerity, and when will you commit to lifting the NHS pay cap?
Welsh: Diolch i chi, Llywydd. Byddaf yn rhoi un cyfle arall i chi gyfaddef popeth nawr: a ydych chi'n edifarhau o gwbl am weithredu cynni ariannol y Torïaid, a phryd wnewch chi ymrwymo i gael gwared ar gap cyflog y GIG?
English: The leader of Plaid Cymru asked what the point of Labour is. I can remind her that we have 28 MPs and her party has four. That is the point of Labour. People have faith in Welsh Labour. We saw that in the general election campaign. They keep on saying, 'Do this, do that'. Well, people aren't listening to them. She and I are in the same position in terms of the public sector pay cap. Surely, there are two things she must agree with. Firstly, that the first port of call must be to secure the money from Westminster. Surely, we don't give up on that. That is something that we need to pursue. Secondly, surely she doesn't expect us to make a decision on the hoof, without examining all the potential costs, and that is something -
Welsh: Gofynnodd arweinydd Plaid Cymru beth yw pwynt y Blaid Lafur. A gaf i ei hatgoffa bod gennym ni 28 o ASau a bod gan ei phlaid hi bedwar. Dyna yw pwynt y Blaid Lafur. Mae gan bobl ffydd yn Llafur Cymru. Gwelsom hynny yn ymgyrch yr etholiad cyffredinol. Maen nhw'n dweud dro ar ôl tro, 'Gwnewch hyn, gwnewch hynna'. Wel, nid yw pobl yn gwrando arnyn nhw. Mae hi a minnau o'r un safbwynt o ran cap cyflog y sector cyhoeddus. Yn sicr, mae dau beth y mae'n rhaid ei bod hi'n cytuno â nhw. Yn gyntaf, mai'r peth cyntaf y mae'n rhaid ei wneud yw sicrhau'r arian gan San Steffan. Nid ydym yn troi ein cefnau ar hynny, does bosib. Mae hynny'n rhywbeth y mae angen i ni ei wneud. Yn ail, does bosib ei bod hi'n disgwyl i ni wneud penderfyniad difeddwl, heb archwilio'r holl gostau posibl, ac mae hynny'n rhywbeth -
English: It's in the manifesto.
Welsh: Mae yn y maniffesto.
English: The Llywydd rightly stopped people heckling the leader of Plaid Cymru, so she can do the same for me. As I said, this is something that we want to take forward, but the first port of call is to say to the UK Government, 'You found the money for Northern Ireland; now you find the money for Wales'.
Welsh: Roedd y Llywydd yn iawn i atal pobl rhag heclo arweinydd Plaid Cymru, felly gall hi wneud yr un peth i mi. Fel y dywedais, mae hyn yn rhywbeth yr ydym ni'n awyddus i fwrw ymlaen ag ef, ond y peth cyntaf i'w wneud yw dweud wrth Lywodraeth y DU, 'Fe ddaethoch chi o hyd i'r arian i Ogledd Iwerddon; nawr dewch o hyd i'r arian i Gymru'.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. First Minister, last week, obviously, the Government took the decision not to back the Circuit of Wales development at the Heads of the Valleys in Blaenau Gwent. One of the proposals that was put forward was, obviously, the development of an automotive technology park that potentially could create 1,500 jobs over its lifespan. The enterprise zone has been in existence in Blaenau Gwent for over five years now. In its first four years, it created 172 jobs, and in the last year the figures are available for it managed to create a mere eight jobs. What confidence can you give that this technology park that you're proposing will actually generate the jobs that you say it will generate - 1,500 - when your enterprise zone, which has been going for five years, hasn't even generated 200 jobs?
Welsh: Diolch i chi, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, yr wythnos diwethaf, yn amlwg, gwnaeth y Llywodraeth y penderfyniad i beidio â chefnogi datblygiad Cylchffordd Cymru ym Mlaenau'r Cymoedd ym Mlaenau Gwent. Un o'r cynigion a wnaed oedd, yn amlwg, datblygu parc technoleg modurol a allai o bosibl greu 1,500 o swyddi yn ystod ei oes. Mae'r ardal fenter wedi bodoli ym Mlaenau Gwent ers dros bum mlynedd erbyn hyn. Yn ystod ei phedair blynedd gyntaf, creodd 172 o swyddi, ac yn y flwyddyn ddiwethaf y mae'r ffigurau ar gael ar ei chyfer, llwyddodd i greu wyth o swyddi yn unig. Pa sicrwydd allwch chi ei roi y bydd y parc technoleg hwn yr ydych chi'n ei gynnig wir yn creu'r swyddi yr ydych chi'n dweud y bydd yn eu creu - 1,500 - pan nad yw eich ardal fenter, sydd wedi bod yn gweithredu ers pum mlynedd, wedi creu 200 o swyddi hyd yn oed?
English: Can I, before I answer the question, offer my sympathies as well to the leader of the Welsh Conservatives, and, indeed, his group, and the family, fiancée, friends and colleagues of Ben Davies? It was a tragic event that we saw in Greece. So, first of all, could I express my sympathies with regard to what happened to Ben? We all rely on our staff and it was a deeply tragic incident for such a young man. The simple answer to this question is '£100 million'. We're going to put £100 million into the technology park. We've talked to businesses to assess the level of demand, bearing in mind, of course, that this formed part of the circuit scheme, the technology park. It was something that was mooted as part of that scheme. We feel that it can be taken forward, and, having taken soundings from businesses on the need to invest, of course, in skills, this is something that we can support. One of the issues that we have faced in the Heads of the Valleys for some years is investors saying that there are no buildings for them to go into. Now, speculative building is not something we want to encourage, but this is based on what businesses themselves have been saying to us. On that basis, we're confident the jobs can be created.
Welsh: A gaf i, cyn i mi ateb y cwestiwn, estyn fy nghydymdeimlad hefyd i arweinydd y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig, ac, yn wir, ei grŵp, a theulu, dyweddi, ffrindiau a chydweithwyr Ben Davies? Roedd yn ddigwyddiad trasig a welsom yng Ngwlad Groeg. Felly, yn gyntaf oll, a gaf i fynegi fy nghydymdeimlad o ran yr hyn a ddigwyddodd i Ben? Rydym ni i gyd yn dibynnu ar ein staff ac roedd yn ddigwyddiad trasig iawn i ŵr mor ifanc. Yr ateb syml i'r cwestiwn hwn yw '£100 miliwn'. Rydym ni'n mynd i roi £100 miliwn i mewn i'r parc technoleg. Rydym ni wedi siarad â busnesau i asesu lefel y galw, gan gofio, wrth gwrs, bod hyn yn rhan o gynllun y gylchffordd, y parc technoleg. Roedd yn rhywbeth a gafodd ei grybwyll yn rhan o'r cynllun hwnnw. Teimlwn y gellir bwrw ymlaen ag ef, ac, ar ôl gwneud ymholiadau ymhlith busnesau am yr angen i fuddsoddi, wrth gwrs, mewn sgiliau, mae hyn yn rhywbeth y gallwn ni ei gefnogi. Un o'r problemau yr ydym ni wedi eu hwynebu ym Mlaenau'r Cymoedd ers rhai blynyddoedd yw buddsoddwyr yn dweud nad oes unrhyw adeiladau iddyn nhw fynd i mewn iddynt. Nawr, nid yw adeiladu hapfasnachol yn rhywbeth yr ydym ni eisiau ei annog, ond mae hyn yn seiliedig ar yr hyn y mae busnesau eu hunain wedi bod yn ei ddweud wrthym ni. Ar y sail honno, rydym ni'n hyderus y gall y swyddi gael eu creu.
English: We have had discussion with businesses, particularly those in the automotive sector, and they have said to us that a circuit is not required to move forward with the technology park. It's something that would be nice to have but not essential to have. I think if I represent it in that way, it's a fair representation. But, certainly, the development of the technology park in their view is not dependent on the development of a circuit. What is absolutely crucial is that we secure the jobs in the technology park and protect the public purse. That's hugely important, and that's exactly what we've done in taking this decision.
Welsh: Rydym ni wedi cael trafodaeth gyda busnesau, yn enwedig y rhai yn y sector modurol, ac maen nhw wedi dweud wrthym nad oes angen cylchffordd i fwrw ymlaen â'r parc technoleg. Mae'n rhywbeth y byddai wedi bod yn braf ei gael ond nid yn hanfodol ei gael. Rwy'n credu os gwnaf ei roi yn y termau hynny, bod hynny'n deg. Ond, yn sicr, nid yw datblygiad y parc technoleg yn eu barn nhw yn ddibynnol ar ddatblygu cylchffordd. Yr hyn sy'n gwbl hanfodol yw ein bod ni'n sicrhau'r swyddi yn y parc technoleg ac yn diogelu pwrs y wlad. Mae hynny'n hynod bwysig, a dyna'n union yr ydym ni wedi ei wneud wrth wneud y penderfyniad hwn.
English: Will you, therefore, then, First Minister, make public all the evidence that you've based your decision on - the £100 million investment and the due diligence that you as a Government, I hope, have undertaken, and the ability to have confidence that that 1,500 jobs figure will be reached - so that in two, three or four years' time, we're not looking back at a big shed that is empty and these job opportunities lost to that particular area of Wales? As I've said - and I sincerely mean it - I hope the jobs come, but if you look at the track record of the five years of the enterprise zone, which was an automotive enterprise zone, I might add, you haven't managed to create 200 jobs in that area, and in the last year where figures are available, only eight jobs have been created, despite all the incentives of the enterprise zone. Will you, therefore, make public the evidence that you've based your decision on to sanction £100 million-worth of investment, and the feasibility in the figure that you've put forward of 1,500 jobs being created?
Welsh: A wnewch chi, felly, felly, Prif Weinidog, gyhoeddi'r holl dystiolaeth yr ydych chi wedi seilio eich penderfyniad arni - y buddsoddiad o £100 miliwn a'r diwydrwydd dyladwy yr ydych chi fel Llywodraeth, rwy'n gobeithio, wedi ei wneud, a'r gallu i fod â hyder y bydd y ffigur swyddi 1,500 yna'n cael ei gyrraedd - fel na fyddwn ni, ymhen dwy, tair neu bedair blynedd, yn edrych yn ôl ar sied fawr sy'n wag a'r cyfleoedd hyn am swyddi wedi eu colli i'r ardal benodol honno o Gymru? Fel yr wyf i wedi ei ddweud - ac rwy'n ei feddwl yn ddiffuant - rwy'n gobeithio y bydd y swyddi'n dod, ond os edrychwch chi ar hanes pum mlynedd yr ardal fenter, a oedd yn ardal fenter fodurol, dylwn ychwanegu, nid ydych chi wedi llwyddo i greu 200 o swyddi yn yr ardal honno, ac yn y flwyddyn ddiwethaf y mae ffigurau ar gael ar ei chyfer, dim ond wyth o swyddi sydd wedi eu creu, er gwaethaf holl gymhellion yr ardal fenter. A wnewch chi, felly, gyhoeddi'r dystiolaeth yr ydych chi wedi seilio eich penderfyniad arni i ganiatáu gwerth £100 miliwn o fuddsoddiad, a dichonoldeb y ffigur yr ydych chi wedi ei fynegi o 1,500 o swyddi'n cael eu creu?
English: We will make available all that can be made available, subject to commercial confidentiality discussions, of course, with other businesses. But I think it's right with this decision and this project that as much information is in the public domain as possible. We're not afraid of that and, certainly, it is something that we are considering: how can we get as much information into the public domain. We saw some emerging today in an unfortunate manner, but we want to make sure that the information is there for Members and for members of the public.
Welsh: Byddwn yn rhoi ar gael popeth y gellir ei roi ar gael, yn amodol ar drafodaethau cyfrinachedd masnachol, wrth gwrs, gyda busnesau eraill. Ond rwy'n credu ei bod yn iawn o ran y penderfyniad hwn ac o ran y prosiect hwn bod cymaint o wybodaeth ar gael i'r cyhoedd â phosibl. Nid ydym yn ofni hynny ac, yn sicr, mae'n rhywbeth yr ydym ni'n ei ystyried: sut y gallwn ni gael cymaint o wybodaeth â phosibl i mewn i'r parth cyhoeddus. Gwelsom rywfaint yn dod i'r amlwg heddiw mewn modd anffodus, ond rydym ni eisiau gwneud yn siŵr bod y wybodaeth yno i'r Aelodau ac i aelodau o'r cyhoedd.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. I'd like to continue this line of questioning with the First Minister, if I may. Is it not a tragedy that the Circuit of Wales project appears to have been strangled not because of any credible doubts about the viability of the racetrack project - because there was nothing in the Cabinet Secretary's statement to that effect - but because of a technical internal accounting device by Her Majesty's Treasury and the Office for National Statistics? Shouldn't we look through the form of the accounts to the substance of the project? It's an entirely private sector-funded project upfront. All that the Welsh Government was asked for was a guarantee, for which they would be paid £3 million a year. It was secured on the assets that are to be constructed, because the guarantee doesn't even begin until the construction phase is completed, and 100 per cent of the assets were available to secure what was a loan of less than 50 per cent of the funding. So, on the face of it, that appears to be pretty good security. And is there not a way through this, even at this late stage, that we could continue to look at the possibility of untying the Gordian knot with the Treasury and see if there is an imaginative solution to this in accounting terms, which would enable the private sector money to be put in, which, on balance, I think would be better than for the Welsh Government to have to commit its own money upfront, which is now what is proposed?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Hoffwn barhau â'r thema holi hon gyda'r Prif Weinidog, os caf. Onid yw'n drasiedi ei bod yn ymddangos bod prosiect Cylchffordd Cymru wedi cael ei dagu nid oherwydd unrhyw amheuon credadwy am ddichonoldeb y prosiect trac rasio - oherwydd nid oedd unrhyw beth yn natganiad Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet i'r perwyl hwnnw - ond oherwydd dyfais cyfrifyddu mewnol technegol gan Drysorlys ei Mawrhydi a'r Swyddfa Ystadegau Gwladol? Oni ddylem ni edrych drwy ffurf y cyfrifon i sylwedd y prosiect? Mae'n brosiect a ariennir gan y sector preifat yn gyfan gwbl ymlaen llaw. Y cwbl y gofynnwyd i Lywodraeth Cymru amdano oedd gwarant, y byddent yn cael eu talu £3 miliwn y flwyddyn amdano. Fe'i sicrhawyd ar yr asedau sydd i'w hadeiladu, gan nad yw'r warant hyd yn oed yn dechrau tan ar ôl i'r cam adeiladu gael ei gwblhau, ac roedd 100 y cant o'r asedau ar gael i sicrhau'r hyn a oedd yn fenthyciad o lai na 50 y cant o'r cyllid. Felly, ar yr olwg gyntaf, mae'n ymddangos bod hynny'n sicrwydd eithaf da. Ac onid oes ffordd drwy hyn, hyd yn oed ar y cam hwyr hwn, y gallem ni barhau i edrych ar y posibilrwydd o ddatod y cwlwm annatod gyda'r Trysorlys a gweld a oes ateb llawn dychymyg i hyn o safbwynt cyfrifyddu, a fyddai'n galluogi'r arian sector preifat i gael ei gyfrannu, a fyddai, ar y cyfan, rwy'n credu, yn well nag i Lywodraeth Cymru orfod ymrwymo ei harian ei hun ymlaen llaw, sef yr hyn a gynigir ar hyn o bryd?
English: The issue is this, isn't it: the problem has always been that if this project had strong support from private investors, it wouldn't need a guarantee from the Government, and it would be able to stand on its own two feet without that guarantee. As we said in the Chamber last week, the difficulty that we have faced is that no final decision will be given by the ONS or Eurostat as to whether this financial deal will be on or off the balance sheet until the contracts are signed, by which point it's too late. And, of course, at that point we are in a position where, in two or three years' time, if the circuit didn't work out, the guarantee is called on. That is the problem with this. Now, we cannot take that risk. We know that we would not get a final decision from them. The fact is that, as the deal is currently structured, it does not appear to have met our conditions. If a new proposal comes forward then, of course, we'd examine it. But we cannot take the risk with public money and take the risk of this money appearing on our balance sheet. If that were to happen, we would be treated as if we had already paid that money over and the money would be cut from our capital budget, which would mean, for example, potentially having to make cuts in this financial year. That's not something that we as a responsible Government can take a risk with.
Welsh: Y broblem yw hyn, ynte: y broblem erioed fu pe byddai gan y prosiect hwn gefnogaeth gref gan fuddsoddwyr preifat, ni fyddai angen gwarant gan y Llywodraeth, a byddai'n gallu sefyll ar ei draed ei hun heb y warant. Fel y dywedasom yn y Siambr yr wythnos diwethaf, yr anhawster yr ydym ni wedi ei wynebu yw na fydd unrhyw benderfyniad terfynol yn cael ei wneud gan y Swyddfa Ystadegau Gwladol nac Eurostat o ran ba un a fydd y cytundeb ariannol hwn ar neu oddi ar y fantolen tan fod y contractau wedi eu llofnodi, ac mae'n rhy hwyr erbyn hynny. Ac, wrth gwrs, ar yr adeg honno, rydym ni mewn sefyllfa lle, ymhen dwy neu dair blynedd, pe na byddai'r gylchffordd yn llwyddo, y gelwir am y warant. Dyna'r broblem gyda hyn. Nawr, ni allwn gymryd y risg honno. Rydym ni'n gwybod na fyddem ni'n cael penderfyniad terfynol ganddyn nhw. Y ffaith yw, fel y mae'r cytundeb wedi ei strwythuro ar hyn o bryd, nid yw'n ymddangos ei fod wedi bodloni ein hamodau. Os bydd cynnig newydd yn cael ei wneud, yna, wrth gwrs, byddem ni'n ei archwilio. Ond ni allwn gymryd y risg gydag arian cyhoeddus a chymryd y risg y bydd yr arian hwn yn ymddangos ar ein mantolen. Pe byddai hynny'n digwydd, byddem ni'n cael ein trin fel pe byddem ni eisoes wedi talu'r arian hwnnw a byddai'r arian yn cael ei dorri o'n cyllideb gyfalaf, a fyddai'n golygu, er enghraifft, gorfod gwneud toriadau yn y flwyddyn ariannol hon o bosib. Nid yw hynny'n rhywbeth y gallwn ni fel Llywodraeth gyfrifol gymryd risg ynglŷn ag ef.