English: Thank you to the Minister for an advance copy of the statement that has been made. I have to say, we haven't learned anything new from the Government in terms of the statement. I'm not quite sure why you feel it absolutely necessary to keep bringing statements forward to the National Assembly on such a frequent basis when you have nothing new to say, but given that you have managed to speak for around 10 minutes to say nothing, I will attempt to actually ask you some, what I think are, important questions. One thing that we do know is this: there's nobody else in British politics, other than the UK Government, that has a detailed plan for our future relationship that delivers on the instruction of the British people and has been negotiated with the EU. The Prime Minister's withdrawal agreement will secure us being able to leave the EU now on 12 April. It will end free movement. It will enable a new business-friendly customs model with freedom to strike new trade deals around the world. There are clear commitments in there on consumer and employment rights, and on the environment. And, of course, we'll be able to leave the common agricultural policy and the common fisheries policy, we'll be able to end the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice, and there will be no need for a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. You say as a Government that you want to end the uncertainty - so do I, as much as you do - but there's only one way to end the uncertainty very quickly, and that is to vote for the withdrawal agreement, the deal that has been secured between the Prime Minister and the European Union. So, I will ask you again, Brexit Minister, as I have done on many occasions in this Chamber: why is it that you cannot support the deal that has been negotiated, that the EU wants you to support, that the UK Government has managed to deliver and to negotiate with the European Union, that will put an end to all of this uncertainty that you're constantly bleating we need an end to? You've said that the Prime Minister's deal is dead but, of course, we know that in terms of the total number of votes cast, it secured more votes in terms of support in the House of Commons than any of the other alternatives, including your preferred route of a customs union. There's not sufficient support for a second referendum or for a common market 2.0, but what we do have is more people voting in the meaningful votes that have been presented to Parliament for the withdrawal agreement, including in the meaningful vote that took place last week, than for any of those other alternative options. So, I would suggest that what we actually need is an end to the dithering on your benches, and allow for some support to come from the opposition in a responsible way to ensure that we can put an end to this uncertainty and move forward with our lives. You seem to be afraid of a general election. The Prime Minister is not calling a general election. I think you're more afraid - . [ Interruption.] Frankly, most of you are more afraid of having Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister than anything else, which is probably why you're trying to talk down any idea that a general election would be a good idea. I don't want to see a general election either; I would far rather see this Government take us through with a decent withdrawal agreement, which is what I believe that we have, which, of course, is a compromise. Now, do you accept that if your approach to Brexit were to be pursued, you would be betraying, as a party, many of the things that you have promised to deliver in terms of the commitments that you have made and your leader has made - and I refer to Jeremy Corbyn - in the past? He's talked about sorting out this issue of freedom of movement, making sure that the jurisdiction of the ECJ doesn't apply in the UK and not allowing for significant sums of money to be paid into the EU for the access to their markets. He's said all of these things on the record in the past, and yet for some reason you think that it's acceptable to now reverse all of those comments and promises that have been made in order to keep us in a customs union that would stop us being able to do our free-trade deals around the world - one of the things that people voted for in the referendum. Do you accept that your party, the Welsh Labour Party, is simply a party of 'remain' that wants to try to keep us locked into the EU and wants to reverse the outcome and certainly not implement the outcome of the referendum of June 2016, in which the people of Wales and the Minister's own constituency voted to leave the EU? I don't know about you, but I'm a democrat and I believe that when the people of Wales vote in a referendum, we should obey their instructions as Members of this Assembly, and our Members of Parliament should also follow suit. It seems to me that all you're trying to do is to frustrate the process of delivering on that instruction by not supporting the Prime Minister's deal, which will deliver on the instruction of the British people and the people of Wales in voting to leave the EU. So, when will you change your tactic? You're telling everybody else to compromise. When will you compromise and accept that there is a compromise deal on the table that delivers on the referendum result and will ensure that we leave the EU in an orderly fashion, with sufficient time to be able to negotiate a new relationship post the end of that withdrawal period?
Welsh: Diolch i'r Gweinidog am gopi ymlaen llaw o'r datganiad a wnaed. Mae'n rhaid imi ddweud, nid ydym ni wedi dysgu unrhyw beth newydd gan y Llywodraeth o ran y datganiad. Nid wyf yn hollol siŵr pam rydych chi'n teimlo ei bod hi'n gwbl angenrheidiol parhau i wneud datganiadau i'r Cynulliad Cenedlaethol mor aml pan nad oes gennych chi ddim byd newydd i'w ddweud, ond o gofio eich bod wedi llwyddo i siarad am oddeutu 10 munud i ddweud dim, fe wnaf i geisio gofyn i chi mewn gwirionedd yr hyn yr wyf yn credu sy'n gwestiynau pwysig. Un peth y gwyddom ni yw hyn: nid oes neb arall yng ngwleidyddiaeth Prydain, heblaw am Lywodraeth y DU, â chynllun manwl ar gyfer ein perthynas yn y dyfodol sy'n anrhydeddu cyfarwyddyd pobl Prydain ac sydd wedi'i negodi gyda'r UE. Bydd cytundeb ymadael y Prif Weinidog yn sicrhau y gallwn ni adael yr UE nawr ar 12 Ebrill. Bydd yn rhoi terfyn ar ryddid i symud. Bydd yn fodd o gael model tollau newydd sy'n ystyriol o fusnesau a ble mae rhyddid i lunio cytundebau masnach newydd ledled y byd. Mae'n cynnwys ymrwymiadau ynglŷn â hawliau cyflogaeth a defnyddwyr, ac o ran yr amgylchedd. Ac, wrth gwrs, byddwn yn gallu gadael y polisi amaethyddol cyffredin a'r polisi pysgodfeydd cyffredin, byddwn ni'n gallu rhoi terfyn ar awdurdodaeth Llys Cyfiawnder Ewrop, ac ni fydd angen ffin galed rhwng Gogledd Iwerddon a Gweriniaeth Iwerddon. Rydych chi'n dweud fel Llywodraeth eich bod eisiau rhoi terfyn ar yr ansicrwydd - rwyf innau hefyd, cymaint â chithau - ond dim ond un ffordd sydd yna o roi terfyn ar yr ansicrwydd yn gyflym iawn, a hynny yw pleidleisio o blaid y cytundeb ymadael, y cytundeb sydd wedi ei sicrhau rhwng Prif Weinidog y DU a'r Undeb Ewropeaidd. Felly, gofynnaf ichi eto, Gweinidog Brexit, fel yr wyf i wedi gwneud droeon yn y Siambr hon: pam na allwch chi gefnogi'r cytundeb a negodwyd, y mae'r UE eisiau ichi ei gefnogi, y mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi llwyddo i'w gyflawni a'i negodi gyda'r Undeb Ewropeaidd, a fydd yn rhoi terfyn ar yr holl ansicrwydd hwn yr ydych chi'n rhefru'n gyson fod angen inni roi terfyn arno? Rydych chi wedi dweud bod cytundeb y Prif Weinidog wedi cael ergyd farwol ond, wrth gwrs, rydym ni'n gwybod o ran cyfanswm nifer y pleidleisiau a fwriwyd, y sicrhaodd fwy o bleidleisiau o ran cefnogaeth yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin nag unrhyw ddewisiadau eraill, gan gynnwys eich hoff ddewis chi o undeb tollau. Nid oes digon o gefnogaeth am ail refferendwm neu farchnad gyffredin 2.0, ond yr hyn sydd gennym ni yw mwy o bobl yn pleidleisio yn y pleidleisiau ystyrlon sydd wedi eu cyflwyno i'r Senedd ar gyfer y cytundeb ymadael, gan gynnwys yn y bleidlais ystyrlon a gynhaliwyd yr wythnos diwethaf, nag ar gyfer unrhyw un o'r dewisiadau eraill hynny yn lle. Felly, byddwn yn awgrymu mai'r hyn sydd ei angen arnom ni mewn gwirionedd yw rhoi terfyn ar y tin-droi ar eich meinciau chi, a chaniatáu rhywfaint o gefnogaeth gan y gwrthbleidiau mewn ffordd gyfrifol er mwyn sicrhau y gallwn ni roi terfyn ar yr ansicrwydd hwn a symud ymlaen gyda'n bywydau. Ymddengys eich bod yn ofni etholiad cyffredinol. Nid yw'r Prif Weinidog yn galw etholiad cyffredinol. Rwy'n credu eich bod yn fwy ofnus - . [Torri ar draws.] A dweud y gwir, mae'r rhan fwyaf ohonoch chi'n fwy ofnus o gael Jeremy Corbyn yn Brif Weinidog na dim arall, a dyna pam fwy na thebyg eich bod yn ceisio wfftio at unrhyw syniad y byddai etholiad cyffredinol yn syniad da. Nid wyf i eisiau gweld etholiad cyffredinol ychwaith; byddai'n well o lawer gennyf weld y Llywodraeth hon yn sicrhau cytundeb ymadael gweddus ar ein cyfer, sef yr hyn y credaf fod gennym ni, sydd, wrth gwrs, yn gyfaddawd. Nawr, a ydych chi'n derbyn pe byddem yn ceisio gweithredu eich ffordd chi o fynd i'r afael â Brexit, y byddech chi'n bradychu, fel plaid, llawer o'r pethau yr ydych chi wedi addo eu cyflawni o ran yr ymrwymiadau a wnaethoch chi ac y mae eich arweinydd wedi eu gwneud - ac rwy'n cyfeirio at Jeremy Corbyn - yn y gorffennol? Mae wedi sôn am ddatrys y mater hwn o ryddid i symud, gwneud yn siŵr nad yw awdurdodaeth Llys Cyfiawnder Ewrop yn berthnasol yn y DU a pheidio â chaniatáu talu symiau sylweddol o arian i'r UE er mwyn cael mynediad at eu marchnadoedd. Mae wedi dweud pob un o'r pethau hyn ar goedd yn y gorffennol, ac eto am ryw reswm rydych chi'n credu ei bod hi'n dderbyniol gwrthdroi'r holl sylwadau a'r addewidion a wnaethpwyd er mwyn ein cadw ni mewn undeb tollau a fyddai'n atal ein gallu i wneud ein cytundebau masnach rydd ledled y byd - un o'r pethau y pleidleisiodd pobl o'i blaid yn y refferendwm. A ydych chi'n derbyn bod eich plaid chi, Plaid Lafur Cymru, yn ddim byd ond plaid 'aros' sydd eisiau ceisio ein cadw wedi ein clymu i'r UE ac sydd eisiau gwrthdroi'r canlyniad ac yn sicr nid gweithredu canlyniad refferendwm mis Mehefin 2016, ble pleidleisiodd pobl Cymru ac etholaeth y Gweinidog ei hun i adael yr UE? Wn i ddim amdanoch chi, ond rwy'n ddemocrat, ac rwy'n credu pan fo pobl Cymru yn pleidleisio mewn refferendwm, y dylem ni ufuddhau i'w cyfarwyddiadau fel Aelodau o'r Cynulliad hwn, ac y dylai ein Haelodau Seneddol wneud yr un peth hefyd. Mae'n ymddangos i mi mai'r cwbl yr ydych chi'n ceisio ei wneud yw llesteirio'r broses o gyflawni ar y cyfarwyddyd hwnnw drwy beidio â chefnogi cytundeb y Prif Weinidog, a fydd yn anrhydeddu cyfarwyddyd pobl Prydain a phobl Cymru a bleidleisiodd i adael yr UE. Felly, pryd fyddwch chi'n newid eich cân? Rydych chi'n dweud wrth bawb arall i gyfaddawdu. Pryd wnewch chi gyfaddawdu a derbyn bod cytundeb o gyfaddawd yn cael ei gynnig sy'n anrhydeddu canlyniad y refferendwm ac a fydd yn sicrhau ein bod yn gadael yr UE mewn modd trefnus, gyda digon o amser i allu negodi perthynas newydd ar ôl diwedd y cyfnod ymadael hwnnw?