English: Llywydd, the Member's contribution is a tissue of outdated, and therefore highly misleading, assertions. The figure that he quoted is from 2011. You'd think he might have updated his figures a little since then. You'd think he might have read the Institute for Fiscal Studies, who said that the gap between funding in England and Wales had been virtually eliminated, and that was because of cuts, cuts - [ Interruption.] The gap had been virtually eliminated because of the cuts that had been made to education budgets in England. [ Interruption.] Well, you can say 'nonsense', Darren, if you like, but it's the IFS who said that, not me. [ Interruption.] The IFS - and they reported again yesterday. Good idea, I think, to update your figures and, perhaps, your understanding. Were we to get money on the scale that you suggest - and we're certainly not guaranteed to get it; we have a one-year settlement here in Wales, whereas your Government has been prepared to offer three years in England, but not to Wales or to Scotland. If they hadn't spent some of the money before we got it - £50 million to fill the gap in teacher pension contributions, which should have come from the UK Government and which they've refused, despite the rules of the funding formula, to provide to us - and if we did get that money, Llywydd, we will not waste £140 million on free schools that never opened, or opened and closed. If we get money here, we will be investing it in a way that will support those young people in our schools who delivered those record results in A-levels and in GCSEs in August of this year. That's the truth of the matter, and the Member's attempt, as ever, to throw some pall over the achievements of children in Wales does them no good, but it does his party no good at all.
Welsh: Llywydd, mae cyfraniad yr Aelod yn feinwe o honiadau hen ffasiwn, ac felly'n hynod gamarweiniol. Mae'r ffigur a ddyfynnodd o 2011. Byddech chi'n meddwl y byddai wedi diweddaru ychydig ar ei ffigurau ers hynny. Byddech chi'n meddwl efallai y byddai wedi darllen y Sefydliad Astudiaethau Cyllid, a ddywedodd bod y bwlch rhwng cyllid yng Nghymru a Lloegr bron wedi cael ei ddileu, ac roedd hynny oherwydd toriadau, toriadau - [ Torri ar draws.] Roedd y bwlch bron wedi ei ddileu oherwydd y toriadau a wnaed i gyllidebau addysg yn Lloegr. [ Torri ar draws.] Wel, gallwch chi ddweud 'nonsens', Darren, os mynnwch chi, ond yr IFS a ddywedodd hynny, nid fi. [ Torri ar draws.] Yr IFS - ac adroddwyd ganddynt eto ddoe. Syniad da, rwy'n meddwl, fyddai diweddaru eich ffigurau ac, efallai, eich dealltwriaeth. Pe byddem ni'n cael arian ar y raddfa yr ydych chi'n ei awgrymu - ac yn sicr nid oes unrhyw sicrwydd y byddwn ni'n ei gael; mae gennym ni setliad blwyddyn yma yng Nghymru, ac mae eich Llywodraeth chi wedi bod yn barod i gynnig tair blynedd yn Lloegr, ond nid i Gymru nac i'r Alban. Pe na bydden nhw wedi gwario rhywfaint o'r arian cyn i ni ei gael - £50 miliwn i lenwi'r bwlch yng nghyfraniadau pensiwn athrawon, a ddylai fod wedi dod gan Lywodraeth y DU ac y maen nhw wedi gwrthod, er gwaethaf rheolau'r fformiwla ariannu, ei roi i ni - a phe byddem ni'n cael yr arian hwnnw, Llywydd, ni fyddwn yn gwastraffu £140 miliwn ar ysgolion rhydd na agorodd erioed, neu a agorodd ac a gaeodd. Os cawn ni arian yma, byddwn yn ei fuddsoddi mewn ffordd a fydd yn cynorthwyo'r bobl ifanc hynny yn ein hysgolion a sicrhaodd y canlyniadau safon uwch a TGAU gorau erioed hynny ym mis Awst eleni. Dyna wirionedd y mater, ac nid yw ymgais yr Aelod, yn ôl ei arfer, i daflu rhyw gysgod ar gyflawniadau plant yng Nghymru yn gwneud unrhyw ddaioni iddyn nhw, ond nid yw'n gwneud dim daioni o gwbl i'w blaid.