techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: They have to be - . They would certainly lose some of that influence, because they would be coming out of that particular ecosystem. They couldn't have the same partnership. It would be different. So, all I'm saying, I think, is that there is a great deal of work. You may want a report on this - not that I'm offering that - but I do think it needs to be delved into far more deeply. Could I just say one other thing? History is quite interesting. In 1978, the autonomous regions were established in Spain, and Catalunya and Euskadi came into being. In 1979, devolution was rejected in Wales, and S4C came into being. And in 1982, I remember the guys from Catalunya and Euskadi coming to us in S4C to see how you could create new broadcasters. I think that's where the history is. We've come from a different place, so the thinking that we need in terms of devolution is different. It's not the same as Catalunya or Euskadi. They have their own history.
Welsh: Mae'n rhaid iddyn nhw fod yn - . Mi fyddan nhw'n sicr yn colli ryw gymaint ohono fo, achos maen nhw'n dod allan o'r ecosystem arbennig yna. Ni fyddan nhw'n gallu cael yr un bartneriaeth. Bydd hi'n wahanol. Y cyfan rwy'n ei ddweud, rwy'n credu, yw bod lot o waith. Rydych chi eisiau adroddiad, efallai - nid fy mod i'n cynnig - ond rwy'n credu bod eisiau mynd iddo fo yn llawer dyfnach. A gaf i jest ddweud un gair? Mae hanes yn eithaf diddorol. Yn 1978, fe sefydlwyd yr autonomous regions yn Sbaen, ac mi ddaeth Catalunya ac Euskadi i mewn. Yn 1979, fe wrthodwyd datganoli yng Nghymru, ac fe ddaeth S4C. Yn 1982, rwy'n cofio bois Catalunya ac Euskadi yn dod atom ni i S4C i weld sut oedd creu darlledwyr newydd. Ac rwy'n credu yn y fan honno mae'r hanes. Rydym ni wedi dod o rywle gwahanol, felly mae'r meddwl sydd ei angen i sôn am ddatganoli yn wahanol. Nid yw'n debyg i Catalunya ac Euskadi. Mae ganddyn nhw eu hanes eu hunain.
English: Great. Thank you very much for those comments, and thank you for attending. As you said, we will be hearing from S4C to ask them how they're going to implement this, but I'm sure we'll come back to the issue of communication and, perhaps, devolution - I'm not sure - in the future. Thank you very much.
Welsh: Grêt. Diolch yn fawr iawn am y sylwadau yna, a diolch am ddod mewn atom. Fel rydych chi wedi dweud, byddwn ni'n cael S4C i mewn i ofyn iddyn nhw am sut maen nhw'n mynd i weithredu hwn, ond maen siŵr y byddwn ni'n dod yn ôl at y pwnc cyfathrebu, ac, efallai, datganoli - nid wyf yn siŵr - yn y dyfodol. Diolch yn fawr iawn.
English: We're now going to have a short break of five minutes. Thank you very much.
Welsh: Rydym ni'n mynd i gael seibiant o bum munud. Diolch yn fawr iawn.
English: Thank you and welcome to item 4, the Welsh Government's relationship with Pinewood, evidence session 2. We understand that the Minister can only attend the meeting from 10:30 until 11:30, so, following consultation with Members, I've decided, as Chair, to take item 4 on the agenda - the relationship of Welsh Government with Pinewood - before item 3 in terms of film and major television production in Wales. So, we'll move straight into questions. I welcome the witnesses, Dafydd Elis-Thomas, Assembly Member and Minister for Culture, Tourism and Sport, Mick McGuire, director of business and regions, and Joedi Langley - could you say what your title is? We don't have your title here.
Welsh: Diolch a chroeso i eitem 4, perthynas Llywodraeth Cymru â Pinewood, sesiwn dystiolaeth 2. Rydym ar ddeall bod y Gweinidog nawr ond yn gallu mynychu'r cyfarfod o 10:30 i 11:30, felly ar ôl ymgynghori gydag Aelodau, rydw i wedi penderfynu, fel Cadeirydd, cymryd eitem 4 ar yr agenda - perthynas Llywodraeth Cymru â Pinewood - cyn eitem 3 o ran cynyrchiadau ffilm a theledu mawr yng Nghymru. Felly, symudwn yn syth at gwestiynau. Croeso i'r tystion, sef Dafydd Elis-Thomas, Aelod Cynulliad a'r Gweinidog Diwylliant, Twristiaeth a Chwaraeon, Mick McGuire, cyfarwyddwr busnes a'r rhanbarthau, a Joedi Langley - a allwch chi ddweud beth yw eich teitl chi? Nid oes gennym ni'r teitl yma.
English: May I ask one question, Chair? I'm not entirely clear - . I had prepared, for the last meeting, to introduce the Creative Wales programme to this committee before taking it to the Assembly. I have presented a paper, as supplementary evidence for this committee, under the title 'Creative Wales'; I hope you've received that. I would like at some point, if possible, to present that to you, or I won't have formally presented it before the summer, and I do want to appoint to the necessary posts before then. So, I would like an opportunity to discuss that, if possible.
Welsh: A gaf fi ofyn un cwestiwn, Gadeirydd? Nid wyf yn glir iawn - . Roeddwn i wedi paratoi, ar gyfer y cyfarfod diwethaf, i gyflwyno cynllun Cymru Greadigol i'r pwyllgor yma yn gyntaf cyn ei gyflwyno i'r Cynulliad. Rydw i wedi cyflwyno papur, fel tystiolaeth atodol ar gyfer y cyfarfod hwn, dan y teitl 'Cymru Greadigol'; rwy'n gobeithio eich bod chi wedi ei dderbyn o. Fe garwn i ar ryw bwynt, os yn bosib, gyflwyno hwnnw, neu ni fyddaf wedi'i gyflwyno fo'n ffurfiol cyn yr haf, ac rwyf eisiau gweithredu i benodi ar gyfer y swyddi fydd yn angenrheidiol cyn hynny. Felly, fe garwn i gyfle i drafod hynny, os yn bosib.
English: As I said at the beginning, we're going to take questions on Pinewood, but certainly we will be asking questions straight afterwards on Creative Wales. We had more of a brief from the auditor general and we asked you as a Government to take questions on Pinewood, so that is why we want to cover the two issues here today.
Welsh: Fel y gwnes i ddweud ar y cychwyn, rydym yn mynd i gymryd cwestiynau ar Pinewood, ond yn sicr byddwn yn cymryd cwestiynau yn syth ar ôl hynny ar Cymru Greadigol. Fe wnaethom ni gael mwy o frîff gan yr archwilydd cenedlaethol ac fe wnaethom ni ofyn i chi fel Llywodraeth i gael cwestiynau hefyd ar Pinewood, felly dyna pam rydym ni eisiau gwneud y ddau beth yma heddiw.
English: Yes, I'm happy to do that, but you're talking about the historical context before my time in terms of Pinewood, so I will be reliant on the officials who were in place at that time. But I am eager to work with the committee, particularly as I'm developing new policy. I do think that Creative Wales and what we have to put forward, as one of the Labour Government's commitments prior to the election, and the fact that we are taking action there, is of interest to the committee, and I would like to ensure that we do have the time that we didn't have last week to discuss that too, if possible.
Welsh: Ie, rwy'n hapus i wneud hynny, ond wrth gwrs, sôn am y cefndir hanesyddol - cyn fy amser i - y mae Pinewood, ac felly byddaf yn ddibynnol ar y swyddogion a oedd yn weithredol ar y pryd. Ond rwyf yn awyddus i gydweithio gyda'r pwyllgor, yn enwedig pan rydw i'n datblygu polisi newydd. Rwy'n meddwl bod Cymru Greadigol a beth sydd gyda ni i'w gyhoeddi, fel un o ymrwymiadau polisi y Llywodraeth Lafur cyn yr etholiad, a'r ffaith ein bod ni'n gweithredu ar hwnnw, o ddiddordeb i'r pwyllgor ac mi garwn i wneud yn siŵr ein bod ni'n cael amser - ni chawsom ni ddim yr wythnos diwethaf - i drafod hynny hefyd, os yn bosib.
English: Certainly, and that's what we want to ensure as part of this session.
Welsh: Yn sicr, a dyna'r hyn rydym ni eisiau ei sicrhau yn rhan o'r sesiwn yma.
English: The soon we start the questions, the quicker we'll get to Creative Wales. The first questions are from me regarding the Welsh Government's relationship with Pinewood. I acknowledge that you weren't here, but a number of AMs have asked questions, either in the Senedd or in written form, about the management services agreement between the Welsh Government and Pinewood. Given that Pinewood themselves were content that the auditor general should describe those arrangements in full in his published report, with only a single figure redacted, can you explain why it's been quite difficult for us as Assembly Members to obtain information? If the auditor general's report hadn't have happened, for example, we would be looking at a report on film without a significant proportion of information on what had happened between Pinewood and the Government -
Welsh: Po gyntaf y byddwn yn cychwyn y cwestiynau, y cyflymaf y byddwn ni'n dod at Cymru Greadigol. Mae'r cwestiynau gyntaf gen i ynglŷn â pherthynas Llywodraeth Cymru â Pinewood. Gan gydnabod nad oeddech chi yna, mae yna nifer o Aelodau'r Cynulliad wedi gofyn cwestiynau naill ai yn y Senedd neu ar ffurf ysgrifenedig ynglŷn â'r cytundeb gwasanaethau rheoli rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru a Pinewood. O gofio i Pinewood ei hun fod yn fodlon i'r archwilydd cyffredinol ddisgrifio'r trefniadau hynny'n llawn yn ei adroddiad cyhoeddedig, gyda dim ond un ffigwr wedi ei olygu, a ydych yn gallu esbonio pam ei fod wedi bod yn weddol anodd i ni fel Aelodau'r Cynulliad gael gafael ar wybodaeth? Pe na byddai adroddiad yr archwilydd cenedlaethol wedi digwydd, byddem, er enghraifft, yn mynd i adroddiad ar ffilm heb gyfran sylweddol o wybodaeth ar yr hyn a oedd wedi digwydd rhwng Pinewood a'r Llywodraeth -
English: That's not accurate.
Welsh: Nid yw hynny'n gywir.
English: Yes, it is accurate.
Welsh: Ydy, mae'n gywir.
English: What happens is that every time I receive a request, which is either a request from a committee or a freedom of information request from an Assembly Member or from wherever else it may come, I will ensure, and officials will ensure, that we consult the company or the agency or whoever has provided the information to us on the basis that it is commercially confidential, and to ask whether it is right for us to reveal that information. And in that initial discussion that we had with Pinewood, they weren't content for the information that you sought to be divulged, so we made it clear that we wouldn't be able to divulge that information without the consent of the company. But, after the auditor general's report, the auditor general decided - and Pinewood agreed - to divulge further information as part of that report, and that has been in the public domain since then. You could have accessed that information from us as well as from the auditor general, once we'd had Pinewood's consent for that information to be revealed. I have no interest at all in hiding information from an Assembly committee. It would be very strange for someone who has been a committee Chair in this place and has become a Minister to decide not to share information with a committee.
Welsh: Beth sy'n digwydd ydy, bob tro rydw i'n cael cais, sydd naill ai yn gais gan bwyllgor, wrth gwrs, neu'n gais rhyddid gwybodaeth gan Aelod Cynulliad neu o ble bynnag, fe fyddaf i'n sicrhau, neu mae'r swyddogion yn sicrhau, ein bod ni'n ymgynghori gyda'r cwmni neu'r asiantaeth neu bwy bynnag sydd wedi rhoi'r wybodaeth i ni ar y sail ei bod yn fasnachol gyfrinachol, ac i ofyn a yw'n iawn ei datgelu. Ac yn y drafodaeth gyntaf gawsom ni gyda Pinewood, nid oedden nhwn'n fodlon i'r wybodaeth yr oeddech chi'n ei cheisio gael ei datgelu, ac felly fe'i gwnaethom ni hi'n glir na fyddem ni'n gallu datgelu hynny heb ganiatâd y cwmni ymhellach. Ond ar ôl yr ymchwiliad gyda'r archwiliwr cyffredinol, fe benderfynodd yr archwiliwr - ac fe wnaeth Pinewood gytuno - ddatgelu rhagor o wybodaeth, ac felly mae'r wybodaeth yna wedi bod yn gyhoeddus ers hynny. Mi fyddech chi wedi gallu cael honno oddi wrthym ni yn ogystal ag oddi wrth yr archwiliwr cyffredinol, unwaith yr oeddem ni wedi cael caniatâd Pinewood i'r wybodaeth honno gael ei rhannu. Nid oes gennyf i ddim diddordeb o gwbl mewn celu gwybodaeth oddi wrth bwyllgor y Cynulliad; byddai hynny'n rhyfedd iawn i rywun sydd wedi bod yn gadeirydd pwyllgor yn y lle yma, yn troi'n Weinidog ac yn penderfynu peidio â rhannu gwybodaeth gyda phwyllgor.
English: I wasn't just talking about the committee; I was talking about Assembly Members in this committee who have tried to ask questions previously. So, you're saying that you didn't have Pinewood's permission at the time to be able to release that information, and it was only after the auditor general became involved in the situation that permission was given.
Welsh: Nid oeddwn i jest yn sôn am y pwyllgor; roeddwn i'n sôn am Aelodau Cynulliad yn y pwyllgor yma sydd wedi ceisio gofyn cwestiynau'n flaenorol. Felly, rydych chi'n dweud nad oeddech chi wedi cael caniatâd Pinewood ar y pryd i allu rhyddhau'r wybodaeth honno, a dim ond ar ôl i'r archwilydd cenedlaethol ymwneud â'r sefyllfa yr oedd y caniatâd wedi dod gerbron.
English: For the additional information, yes - it was all of the information that was requested. It isn't possible, in my view - and I will ask Mick to expand on this - for us to work with commercial companies - and in this area, of course, most of the collaboration is with commercial companies - unless their definition of what is commercially confidential is accepted by us, and that we are unable to divulge what has been shared for the purposes of policy development and, possibly, for financial reasons. It's very difficult if the scale of financial support provided by Government to a commercial company - if the Government's declarations on our spending can lead people to do some simple sums to see what contribution is made from the commercial side. In terms of competition, that is difficult when we're dealing with more than one company. So, that's the situation we're in. We have adhered to the principle, and I don't think there's any other way of operating, if truth be told, when there is a public-private partnership at stake.
Welsh: Ar gyfer y wybodaeth ychwanegol, ie - y wybodaeth gyfan a ofynnwyd amdani. Nid oes dim modd, yn fy marn i - ac mi ofynnaf i Mick ymhelaethu - inni allu cydweithio gyda chwmnïau masnachol - ac yn y maes yma, wrth gwrs, mae'r rhan fwyaf o'r cydweithio hynny gyda chwmnïau masnachol - dim ond ar yr amodau bod eu diffiniad nhw o beth sydd yn fasnachol gyfrinachol yn cael ei dderbyn gyda ni, ac nad ydym ni'n gallu datgelu beth sydd wedi cael ei rannu at bwrpas datblygu polisi ac, o bosibl, rhoi cefnogaeth ariannol. Mae'n anodd iawn wedyn os ydy faint o gefnogaeth ariannol sy'n cael ei rhoi gan y Llywodraeth mewn pecyn i gwmni masnachol - os ydy'r datgeliad gan y Llywodraeth o'n gwariant ni yn gallu arwain pobl i wneud syms eithaf syml i weld faint yw'r cyfraniad sy'n dod o'r ochr fasnachol. Mae hwn yn gwestiwn anodd yn gystadleuol pan rydym ni'n delio â mwy nag un cwmni. Felly, dyna ydy'r sefyllfa yr ydym ni ynddi hi. Rydym ni wedi glynu at yr egwyddor yna, ac nid wyf yn meddwl bod unrhyw ffordd arall o weithredu, a dweud y gwir, pan mae yna bartneriaeth breifat-cyhoeddus yn y fantol.
English: Just briefly, I have another question. We did touch on it in the last session, but we need to ask an additional question on the state of the roof. That had cost almost £1 million to fix, and was not identified in the independent valuation. Was there any subsequent communication between the Welsh Government and the surveyor on this point, and has the Welsh Government sought financial compensation from them?
Welsh: Jest yn fras, cwestiwn arall sydd gen i. Gwnaethom ni gyffwrdd ag e yn y sesiwn ddiwethaf, ond rydym ni angen gofyn cwestiwn ychwanegol ynglŷn â chyflwr y to. Roedd hwnnw wedi costio bron i £1 miliwn i'w atgyweirio, wedi'i nodi yn y prisiad annibynnol. A oedd unrhyw gyfathrebu dilynol rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru a'r syrfëwr ar y pwynt hwn, ac a yw Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ceisio cael ad-daliad ariannol ganddynt?
English: I'd like to turn to another issue that is included in the termination agreement, which is a reference to repair work that Pinewood had completed that was worth £800,000. Do we have any assurances that that work has been completed?
Welsh: Hoffwn i droi at fater arall sydd yn gynwysedig yn y cytundeb terfynu, sef cyfeiriad at waith atgyweirio roedd Pinewood wedi ei gyflawni a oedd gwerth £800,000. A oes yna sicrwydd gennym ni fod y gwaith hwnnw wedi cael ei gyflawni?
English: No.
Welsh: Nag oes.
English: Well, why and how? How are we in this situation? Wasn't that in the ministerial advice?
Welsh: Wel, pam a sut? Hynny yw, sut ydym ni yn y sefyllfa yna? Nag oedd hynny yn y cyngor gweinidogol?
English: I wasn't a Minister at that time, so I have to rely on officials to respond to that.
Welsh: Nid oeddwn i'n Weinidog ar y pryd, felly mae'n rhaid imi ddibynnu ar y swyddogion i ateb hynny.
English: In your evidence, you say that the annual cost of the sponsorship agreement with Pinewood was significantly more than the value of the other sponsorship arrangements the Welsh Government had entered into. Just doing the sums, adding the VAT figure, we are talking about a figure of over £0.5 million a year of sponsorship for Pinewood, where they were paying - well, they were supposed to, according to the original agreement, pay rent of £1.6 million over a period of five years. So, more than £2.5 million of money was going to them, and then the money from the rent that was supposed to come didn't happen. How on earth did that represent anything close to the value for money?
Welsh: Yn eich tystiolaeth, rŷch chi'n dweud fod cost flynyddol cytundeb nawdd Pinewood yn sylweddol uwch na gwerth y trefniadau nawdd eraill roedd Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ymrwymo iddyn nhw. Hynny yw, jest o wneud y symiau, o ychwanegu'r ffigur TAW, rŷm ni'n sôn am ffigur o dros £0.5 miliwn y flwyddyn o nawdd i Pinewood, lle roedden nhw'n talu - wel, roedden nhw i fod, yn ôl y cytundeb gwreiddiol, talu rhent o £1.6 miliwn dros gyfnod o bum mlynedd. Felly, roedd mwy na £2.5 miliwn o arian yn mynd atyn nhw, ac wedyn yr arian rhent a oedd fod i ddod ni ddigwyddodd. Sut ar y ddaear oedd hynny'n cynrychioli unrhyw beth yn agos at werth am arian?
English: I can't answer that, as I've said many times during these discussions. To be honest, I am more interested in discussing what's happening in Pinewood today, because I think it's very important that we not only understand what's happened in the past and what may have been inappropriate, but it's also important for us to discuss too whether the current building is of use to the industry in Wales, and I do think that it is.
Welsh: Fedraf i ddim ateb hynny, fel rydw i wedi dweud sawl gwaith yn y trafodaethau yma. A dweud y gwir, mae gen i fwy o ddiddordeb mewn trafod beth sy'n digwydd yn Pinewood heddiw, oherwydd rydw i'n meddwl ei bod hi'n bwysig iawn ein bod ni nid yn unig yn deall beth sydd wedi digwydd yn y gorffennol a beth oedd o bosibl yn amhriodol, ond mae'n bwysig iawn i ni drafod hefyd os yw'r adeilad presennol o ddefnydd presennol i'r diwydiant yng Nghymru, ac rydw i'n credu ei fod o.
English: I am listening to your views, but at the end of the day the committee has the right to ask questions about what had happened in the past, and also what is happening now. So, please, I will ask you to respect our ability to ask these questions today.
Welsh: Rydw i'n cymryd eich barn chi, ond ar ddiwedd y dydd mae gan y pwyllgor yr hawl i ofyn cwestiynau am yr hyn oedd wedi digwydd yn y gorffennol, a hefyd yr hyn sydd yn digwydd nawr. Felly, plîs, byddwn i'n gofyn i chi barchu'r ffaith ein bod ni'n gallu gofyn y cwestiynau yma heddiw.
English: Of course, you can ask what you like, but it's 11:03 and you'll be complaining in a minute that I can't stay for more than an hour.
Welsh: Wrth gwrs, fe allwch chi ofyn beth liciwch chi, ond mae'n 11:03 ac fe fyddwch chi'n cwyno yn y funud nad ydw i'n aros mwy nag awr.
English: Dafydd, it wasn't us that cut the time. We asked you to come in for a period of time to discuss both issues. You, as a Minister, have cut the time you have to give us evidence. So, with all due respect, we have every right -
Welsh: Dafydd, nid ni wnaeth dorri'r amser. Fe wnaethom ni ofyn i chi ddod mewn am gyfnod o amser i drafod y ddau bwnc. Chi, fel Gweinidog, sydd wedi torri'r amser chi'n gallu dod mewn i roi tystiolaeth i ni. Felly, gyda phob parch, mae rhwydd hynt i ni -
English: I was here for an hour and a quarter last week, and you didn't reach these points at that time either. Mick is happy to answer the question, so I will hand over to him -
Welsh: Fe fues i yma am awr a chwarter yr wythnos diwethaf, a wnaethoch chi ddim cyrraedd y pwynt yr adeg honno. Mae Mick yn fodlon ateb y cwestiwn, felly fe wnaf alw arno -
English: Dafydd, as somebody who spoke at great length when this place didn't exist about the lack of democracy in Wales, it's not acceptable for you just to ignore a question because you weren't the Minister at the time.
Welsh: Dafydd, fel rhywun oedd wedi traethu yn hir iawn pan oedd y lle yma ddim yn bodoli am y diffyg democrataidd yng Nghymru, nid yw'n dderbyniol i chi jest anwybyddu cwestiwn achos nad chi oedd y Gweinidog ar y pryd.
English: I'm not ignoring the question.
Welsh: Nid ydw i'n anwybyddu'r cwestiwn.
English: At the end of the day - . When we're asking a question to the officials, you complain that we're criticising the officials. Somebody has to take responsibility for this, Dafydd. This is terrible.
Welsh: Ar ddiwedd y dydd - . Wedyn, pan rŷm ni'n gofyn cwestiwn felly i'r swyddogion, rydych chi'n cwyno ein bod ni'n collfarnu'r swyddogion. Mae'n rhaid i rywun gymryd cyfrifoldeb am hyn, Dafydd. Mae hyn yn hollol warthus.
English: I take full responsibility for everything that's happened since I've been appointed Minister, and I also take full responsibility for understanding anything that may have gone wrong before then. That's the purpose of this session here, as far as I'm concerned.
Welsh: Rydw i'n cymryd cyfrifoldeb llawn am bopeth ddigwyddodd ers i mi gael fy mhenodi'n Weinidog, ac rydw i hefyd yn cymryd cyfrifoldeb llawn am ddeall unrhyw bethau a aeth o'i le cyn hynny. Dyna ydy diben y sesiwn yma, cyn belled ag ydw i yn y cwestiwn.
English: Do you suggest therefore that the Cabinet Secretary should answer some of these questions -
Welsh: A ydych chi'n awgrymu felly y dylai'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet ddod i ateb rhai o'r cwestiynau yma -
English: The Cabinet Secretary has been here.
Welsh: Mae'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet wedi bod yma.
English: - and that he is responsible?
Welsh: - ac mai fe oedd yn gyfrifol?
English: The Cabinet Secretary was here last week, or the week before last. But Mick is going to answer the question that you raised.
Welsh: Mae'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet wedi bod yma yr wythnos diwethaf, neu'r wythnos cyn diwethaf. Ond mae Mick yn mynd i ateb - yn fodlon ateb y cwestiwn.
English: We move on straight away to questions on general scrutiny regarding film and major television production in Wales. The Minister will be pleased to hear that my first question includes Creative Wales and what is associated with that. Can you explain to us what exactly Creative Wales is? Also, will they be managing the new budget for film in Wales and how, therefore, will that look?
Welsh: Rŷm ni'n symud yn syth at gwestiynau ynglŷn â chraffu cyffredinol, ynglŷn â'r ymchwiliad i ffilm a theledu. Bydd y Gweinidog yn falch i glywed bod fy nghwestiwn cyntaf i yn cynnwys gofyn ynglŷn â Cymru Greadigol a'r hyn sydd ynghlwm â hynny. A allwch chi esbonio inni yn gymwys beth yw Cymru Greadigol? Hefyd, ai nhw fydd yn rheoli'r gyllideb newydd ar gyfer ffilm yng Nghymru, a sut, felly, y bydd hynny'n edrych?