English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer, and I thank the Cabinet Secretary for outlining the priorities of the Government for this supplementary budget. The Finance Committee did meet to scrutinise the budget with the finance Secretary, and the committee was relatively content in considering this supplementary budget, and we haven't made any recommendations this time, but we have come to four conclusions. First, we have concluded that there is a lack of detail, even though the Cabinet Secretary did mention them. There is a lack of detail in the supplementary budget about prioritisation and how decisions are made by the Government in line with programmes such as 'Prosperity for All', the programme for government and, of course, the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015. This is a recurring theme in all our budget scrutiny, and we would urge the Government to provide as much evidence as possible of how allocations meet the objectives of these programmes. Additionally, we believe that it would be useful and more transparent if more explicit details were made available to explain how commitments are funded; for example, whether funding is coming from reserves or underspends in other areas. Our third conclusion relates to financial transactions capital. During the scrutiny process, the Cabinet Secretary outlined the problems associated with this funding stream - and he's just mentioned one answer to those problems, of course - and he updated the committee on his discussions with the Chief Secretary to the Treasury. The Finance Committee considered financial transactions capital in our scrutiny of the original 2018-19 draft budget, and we recognised the limitations of this funding stream at that time, concluding that we were - and I quote: 'concerned by the issues associated with the repayable financial transactions capital, and how restrictions around the use of this funding may limit the Welsh Government to get best value for money in allocating these funds.' During this scrutiny process, we again acknowledged the constraints of the funding streams, but we would urge the Cabinet Secretary to continue to explore all possible avenues of using the available funding. Our last conclusion relates to supplementary budgets submitted by the directly funded bodies - the Assembly Commission, the Wales Audit Office, and the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales. For Members who haven't realised, you don't just have the Welsh Government's supplementary budget before you, but the supplementary budgets for these three bodies as well. As a committee, we took an in-principle view on the supplementary budgets of each of these bodies prior to the publication of the supplementary budget motion, and this approach of having a preview of the supplementary budget was helpful, in our view, and we would commend that approach for future use. Thank you very much.
Welsh: Diolch, Ddirprwy Lywydd, a diolch i'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet am amlinellu blaenoriaethau'r Llywodraeth ar gyfer y gyllideb atodol. Mae'r Pwyllgor Cyllid, wrth gwrs, wedi cyfarfod i graffu ar y gyllideb gyda'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet, ac roedd y pwyllgor yn gymharol fodlon wrth ystyried y gyllideb atodol hon, ac nid ydym wedi gwneud unrhyw argymhellion y tro yma, ond rydym wedi dod i bedwar casgliad. Yn gyntaf, daethom i'r casgliad nad oes digon o fanylion, er bod yr Ysgrifennydd Cabinet wedi sôn amdanyn nhw. Nid oes digon o fanylion yn y gyllideb atodol ynghylch blaenoriaethau a sut mae blaenoriaethu yn cael ei wneud gan y Llywodraeth yn wyneb rhaglenni megis 'Ffyniant i Bawb', y rhaglen lywodraethu ei hun ac, wrth gwrs, Deddf Llesiant Cenedlaethau'r Dyfodol (Cymru) 2015. Mae hon yn thema sy'n codi'n gyson wrth i ni graffu ar y gyllideb, a byddem yn annog y Llywodraeth i ddarparu cymaint o dystiolaeth ag sy'n bosib o sut mae'r dyraniadau'n bodloni amcanion y rhaglenni hyn. At hynny, credwn y byddai'n ddefnyddiol ac yn fwy tryloyw pe bai manylion penodol ar gael i esbonio sut y caiff yr ymrwymiadau eu hariannu. Er enghraifft, a ydyw cyllid yn dod o gronfeydd wrth gefn, neu o danwariant mewn meysydd eraill? Mae ein trydydd casgliad ni yn ymwneud â chyfalaf trafodion ariannol. Yn ystod y gwaith craffu, soniodd Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet am y problemau sy'n gysylltiedig â'r ffrwd ariannu hon - mae e newydd sôn am un ateb i'r broblem yma, wrth gwrs - ac fe roddodd y wybodaeth ddiweddaraf i'r pwyllgor am ei drafodaethau â Phrif Ysgrifennydd y Trysorlys. Fe wnaeth y Pwyllgor Cyllid ystyried cyfalaf trafodion ariannol wrth graffu ar y gyllideb ddrafft gwreiddiol ar gyfer 2018-19, a gwnaethom gydnabod cyfyngiadau'r ffrwd ariannol hon bryd hynny, gan ddod i'r casgliadau ein bod ni, wrth ddyfynnu: 'yn pryderu am y problemau sy'n gysylltiedig â'r cyfalaf trafodion ariannol y mae'n rhaid ei ad-dalu, a'r modd y gallai cyfyngiadau o ran defnyddio'r arian hwn gyfyngu ar Lywodraeth Cymru wrth iddi geisio cael y gwerth gorau am arian yn y modd y mae'n dyrannu'r arian hwn.' Yn y gwaith craffu hwn, gwnaethom gydnabod unwaith eto gyfyngiadau'r ffrwd ariannu, ond byddem yn annog Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet i barhau i ystyried pob ffordd bosibl o ddefnyddio'r cyllid sydd ar gael. Mae ein casgliad olaf yn ymwneud â'r cyllidebau atodol a gyflwynwyd gan y cyrff a ariennir yn uniongyrchol gan y Cynulliad, sef Comisiwn y Cynulliad, Swyddfa Archwilio Cymru ac Ombwdsmon Gwasanaethau Cyhoeddus Cymru. Ac i Aelodau sydd ddim wedi sylweddoli, nid dim ond cyllideb atodol y Llywodraeth sydd gyda chi ger eich bron heddiw, ond cyllideb atodol ar gyfer y tri chorff yma hefyd. Fel pwyllgor, cawsom olwg ar y cyllidebau atodol hyn, ar gyfer pob un corff, cyn bod cynnig y gyllideb wedi ei gyhoeddi, ac roedd y dull hwnnw o gael rhagflas a rhagolwg ar y gyllideb atodol, yn ein barn ni, yn werthfawr, a byddem ni'n annog y ffordd yma o weithredu yn y dyfodol. Diolch yn fawr.