English: I thank the Cabinet Secretary for that response. Campaigners and members of the Assembly cross-party group on haemophilia and contaminated blood, many of whom have campaigned for 30 years for this public inquiry, have told me that the inquiry must have the power to compel witnesses, as previous inquiries did not. There must be full disclosure of documents, because it's alleged that some of these have been destroyed and that medical records were destroyed or tampered with. They want to know why blood products continued to be used, and warnings were ignored and patients weren't informed of the risks; why alternative treatments weren't used; why mild haemophiliacs were treated with concentrates; why commercial interests took precedence over public safety; why money allocated for self-sufficiency in blood was reallocated elsewhere; why self-sufficiency of blood supplies took 13 years in the UK but only five years in Ireland; why Lord Owen and Lord Jenkins's departmental papers were destroyed, under a 10-year rule which does not exist. They want to know information about the Department of Health's inaccurate self-sufficiency in blood products report, which was published in 2006, and they also want the role of the pharmaceutical companies to be investigated. Those are some of the issues. How is the Cabinet Secretary going to use his role to ensure that these people who have suffered so much - . Bearing in mind that 70 people in Wales died, 273 were infected, and so many others have had their lives ruined, how will you be able to ensure that they have their say in the process, that they are able to have their voices heard? The Prime Minister has said that she wants an inquiry that will be what the families want, and I think it is absolutely essential that people from Wales do have their say. Finally, I think that you have partly covered this, but did the Prime Minister or the Health Secretary contact you before actually making this announcement yesterday? I note that you have written to Jeremy Hunt today, but how do you see your involvement in how this inquiry is going to shape up? Because we do know that there have been quite a lot of difficulties in deciding on types of inquiries for disasters that have happened. Obviously, I think it's crucial that this comes out with clear answers because the people who have been affected in this tragic way deserve the truth?
Welsh: Diolch i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet am yr ymateb hwnnw. Mae ymgyrchwyr ac aelodau o grŵp trawsbleidiol y Cynulliad ar hemoffilia a gwaed halogedig, y bu llawer ohonynt yn ymgyrchu am yr ymchwiliad cyhoeddus hwn ers 30 mlynedd, wedi dweud wrthyf fod yn rhaid i'r ymchwiliad gael y pŵer i orfodi tystion i roi tystiolaeth, yn wahanol i ymchwiliadau blaenorol. Mae'n rhaid sicrhau bod dogfennau'n cael eu datgelu'n llawn, gan fod honiadau fod rhai o'r rhain wedi cael eu dinistrio, a bod cofnodion meddygol wedi cael eu dinistrio neu fod rhywrai wedi ymyrryd â hwy. Maent eisiau gwybod pam fod cynhyrchion gwaed wedi parhau i gael eu defnyddio, a pham fod rhybuddion wedi cael eu hanwybyddu a pham na chafodd cleifion wybod am y peryglon; pam na ddefnyddiwyd triniaethau amgen; pam fod pobl â ffurf ysgafn ar hemoffilia wedi cael eu trin â chrynodiadau; pam fod buddiannau masnachol wedi cael blaenoriaeth dros ddiogelwch y cyhoedd; pam fod arian a ddyrannwyd ar gyfer hunangynhaliaeth mewn gwaed wedi cael ei ailddyrannu i rywle arall; pam fod hunangynhaliaeth mewn cyflenwadau gwaed wedi cymryd 13 mlynedd yn y DU ond pum mlynedd yn unig yn yr Iwerddon; pam fod papurau adrannol yr Arglwydd Owen a'r Arglwydd Jenkins wedi cael eu dinistrio o dan reol 10 mlynedd nad yw'n bodoli. Maent eisiau gwybodaeth am adroddiad gwallus yr Adran Iechyd ar hunangynhaliaeth mewn cynhyrchion gwaed, a gyhoeddwyd yn 2006, ac maent hefyd yn galw am ymchwiliad i rôl y cwmnïau fferyllol. Dyna rai o'r materion sy'n codi. Sut y mae Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn mynd i ddefnyddio ei rôl i sicrhau bod y bobl hyn sydd wedi dioddef cymaint - . O gofio bod 70 o bobl yng Nghymru wedi marw, bod 273 wedi'u heintio, a bod bywydau cymaint o bobl eraill wedi cael eu difetha, sut y gallwch sicrhau y byddant yn cael lleisio barn yn y broses, y byddant yn gallu cael eu clywed? Mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi dweud ei bod eisiau ymchwiliad a fydd yn adlewyrchu'r hyn y mae'r teuluoedd ei eisiau, ac rwy'n credu ei bod yn gwbl hanfodol fod pobl o Gymru yn cael lleisio barn. Yn olaf, rwy'n credu eich bod wedi ymdrin â hyn yn rhannol, ond a wnaeth y Prif Weinidog neu'r Ysgrifennydd Iechyd gysylltu â chi cyn gwneud y cyhoeddiad hwn ddoe? Nodaf eich bod wedi ysgrifennu at Jeremy Hunt heddiw, ond pa ran fydd gennych yn y modd y bydd yr ymchwiliad hwn yn cael ei lunio? Oherwydd fe wyddom fod cryn dipyn o anawsterau wedi bod wrth benderfynu ar fathau o ymchwiliadau ar gyfer trychinebau sydd wedi digwydd. Yn amlwg, rwy'n credu ei bod yn hanfodol fod yr ymchwiliad hwn yn cynhyrchu atebion clir oherwydd mae'r bobl yr effeithiwyd arnynt yn y modd enbyd hwn yn haeddu'r gwir?