techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I thank the First Minister. I have read that statement, of course, which was released as a result of the fact that Arriva Trains Wales had withdrawn from the franchise process. Now, reading between the lines and the reports around that, that turns around the fact that Arriva had decided that there was no commercial value now in that franchise, including, of course, the metro and building upon the metro. That, in turn, reflects the fact that there is still reliance on the subsidy from Westminster, and the responsibility being transferred onto Westminster, because this process hasn't yet been completed by your Government. So, what can you tell us today that can give passengers in Wales an assurance, as well as the staff of Arriva Trains Wales, that those jobs will remain in place, that the services will remain in place and that there won't be any problems in providing this franchise as you have pledged?
Welsh: Diolch i'r Prif Weinidog. Rydw i wedi darllen y datganiad hwnnw, wrth gwrs, a oedd yn cael ei ryddhau yn sgil y ffaith bod Trenau Arriva Cymru wedi tynnu mas o'r broses masnachfreintiau, fel petai. O ddarllen drwy'r llinellau a'r adroddiadau o gwmpas hynny, mae hynny yn troi o gwmpas bod Arriva wedi penderfynu nad oes gwerth masnachol bellach yn y fasnachfraint, gan gynnwys, wrth gwrs, y metro ac adeiladu ar y metro. Mae hynny, yn ei dro, yn adlewyrchu'r ffaith bod, o hyd, ddibyniaeth ar sybsidi o San Steffan, a'r cyfrifoldeb yn cael ei drosglwyddo ar San Steffan, gan nad yw'r broses yma wedi'i chwblhau gan eich Llywodraeth chi. Felly, beth ydych chi'n gallu ei ddweud heddiw sy'n rhoi sicrwydd i deithwyr yng Nghymru, a hefyd y staff ar drenau Arriva yng Nghymru, bod y swyddi yn parhau, bod y gwasanaethau yn parhau, ac na fydd unrhyw broblem yn darparu'r fasnachfraint yma fel rydych chi wedi addo?
English: First of all, of course, there are issues to be discussed with the Department of Transport in London. There is no big problem, as far as I know, with regard to proceeding with the process. It's not unusual for a company to withdraw, and, of course, we know that there are companies that are still part of that process. May I say that what we would have preferred to see is a situation where the finance and the funding would have been transferred, and that we could then direct Network Rail - but, of course, that hasn't been given to us - and that we would be given an opportunity to run the franchise as an arm's-length body in the public sector, which is something that has been made available to Scotland but has not been gifted to us, and we are completely angry about that? So, there is no reason now why this should not proceed, and, of course, it's something we want to ensure in order to see a better service for the people of Wales.
Welsh: Wel, yn gyntaf, wrth gwrs, mae yna faterion rydym ni'n gorfod eu trafod gyda'r Adran Drafnidiaeth yn Llundain. Nid oes problem nawr, hyd y gwn i, ynglŷn â symud ymlaen gyda'r broses. Nid yw'n rhywbeth anarferol i gwmni dynnu mas. Mae hynny yn digwydd, ac, wrth gwrs, rydym yn gwybod bod cwmnïau yn dal i fod yn rhan o'r broses. A gaf i ddweud taw beth y byddwn i wedi hoffi ei weld yw sefyllfa lle byddai'r cyllid wedi ei drosglwyddo, o leiaf sefyllfa lle y byddem yn gallu cyfeirio neu gyfarwyddo Network Rail - nid yw hynny wedi cael ei roi inni - ac, wrth gwrs, y cyfle i redeg y franchise fel corff arm's length yn y sector gyhoeddus, sy'n rhywbeth sydd wrth gwrs ar gael i'r Alban ond sydd ddim wedi cael ei roi i Gymru - rhywbeth yr ydym ni'n hollol ddig amdano? Felly, nid oes rheswm nawr pam na ddylai hwn gael ei symud ymlaen, ac, wrth gwrs, mae hynny'n rhywbeth yr ydym ni'n moyn ei sicrhau er mwyn sicrhau cael gweld gwasanaeth gwell i bobl Cymru.
English: First Minister, you're quite right to say that the decision of Arriva to drop out of the bidding process and the franchise process does happen. We shouldn't get too worked up about a bidder deciding that it's not for them. At what point, however, did you know that they were dropping out? Was it sudden? Did they give advance warning? I'm wondering: did the Welsh Government receive any feedback from the company and the staff involved that would be beneficial now, moving forward with the rest of the process? Because, clearly, if other franchised businesses were to drop out as well, then we could end up in quite a tricky situation down the line, so to speak.
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, rydych chi'n gwbl gywir i ddweud bod penderfyniad Arriva i adael y broses ymgeisio a'r broses fasnachfraint yn digwydd. Ni ddylem gynhyrfu'n ormodol am gynigydd yn penderfynu nad yw'n addas iddo fe. Fodd bynnag, pryd oeddech chi'n gwybod eu bod nhw'n tynnu'n ôl? A oedd hwn yn benderfyniad sydyn? A roddwyd rhybudd ymlaen llaw ganddynt? Rwy'n meddwl tybed: a dderbyniodd Llywodraeth Cymru unrhyw adborth gan y cwmni a'r staff dan sylw a fyddai o fudd nawr, wrth symud ymlaen â gweddill y broses? Oherwydd, yn amlwg, pe byddai busnesau masnachfraint eraill yn tynnu'n ôl hefyd, yna gallem ni ganfod ein hunain mewn sefyllfa anodd yn ddiweddarach i lawr y lein, fel petai.
English: Could I write to the Member with the exact data on which Arriva Trains Wales notified Transport Wales on that basis? As I say, it's not uncommon for bidders for major projects to withdraw during the tender process. Arriva made clear that they've done this for their own commercial reasons, and I will share what I can with the Member in terms of information surrounding Arriva's decision. What I can - there will be some issues, obviously, that I can't disclose, I suspect for commercial reasons.
Welsh: A gaf i ysgrifennu at yr Aelod gyda'r union ddata y gwnaeth Trenau Arriva Cymru hysbysu Trafnidiaeth Cymru ar y sail honno? Fel y dywedaf, nid yw'n anghyffredin i gynigwyr ar gyfer prosiectau mawr dynnu'n ôl yn ystod y broses dendro. Gwnaeth Arriva hi'n eglur eu bod wedi gwneud hyn am eu rhesymau masnachol eu hunain, a byddaf yn rhannu'r hyn y gallaf gyda'r Aelod o ran gwybodaeth ynghylch penderfyniad Arriva. Yr hyn y gallaf - bydd rhai materion, yn amlwg, na allaf eu datgelu, am resymau masnachol rwy'n amau.
English: A few weeks ago, it became apparent that new trains of the Great Western Railway service, which serve south Wales, won't include any bilingual signage or announcements. As expected, there were a number of complaints made to the company by passengers, following this news, condemning the decision taken, including by the former Welsh language Minister, Alun Davies. Now, the company's excuse was that these trains serve areas of England as well as Wales, and therefore using bilingual signage and making bilingual announcements wouldn't be appropriate. Interestingly, some passengers in England have expressed support to having Welsh services in England, talking about their experiences of travelling from one country to another in Europe and hearing the language change regularly. Ensuring bilingual signage and announcements on trains is a matter of fundamental respect for the Welsh language. So, can you commit to ensuring that language standards will be introduced by the Government in the transport sector - standards that have been on the Government's desk for almost a year, unfortunately - and therefore that companies such as GWR would be able to provide services and the respect that Welsh speakers deserve?
Welsh: Ychydig wythnosau yn ôl, fe ddaeth i'r amlwg na fydd trenau newydd gwasanaeth Great Western Railway, sydd yn gwasanaethu de Cymru, yn cynnwys unrhyw arwyddion na chyhoeddiadau yn y Gymraeg. Fel y disgwyl, roedd yna nifer o gwynion i'r cwmni gan deithwyr, yn dilyn y newyddion yma, yn condemnio'r penderfyniad, gan gynnwys, gyda llaw, gan gyn-Weinidog y Gymraeg, Alun Davies. Esgus y cwmni oedd bod y trenau hyn yn gwasanaethu ardaloedd yn Lloegr hefyd, ac felly na fuasai defnyddio arwyddion a gwneud cyhoeddiadau dwyieithog yn addas. Yn ddiddorol, mae rhai teithwyr yn Lloegr wedi mynegi cefnogaeth i gael y Gymraeg yn Lloegr, gan sôn am eu profiadau nhw'n teithio o un wlad i'r llall yn Ewrop a chlywed yr iaith yn newid yn gyson. Mae sicrhau arwyddion a chyhoeddiadau dwyieithog ar drenau yng Nghymru yn fater o barch sylfaenol i'r Gymraeg. Felly, a fedrwch chi ymrwymo i sicrhau y bydd safonau iaith yn cael eu cyflwyno gan y Llywodraeth yn y sector drafnidiaeth - safonau sydd wedi bod ar ddesg y Llywodraeth ers bron i flwyddyn, yn anffodus - ac felly mi fyddai cwmnïau fel Great Western Railway yn gallu cynnig gwasanaethau a'r parch y mae siaradwyr Cymraeg yn eu haeddu?
English: May I ask the Minister, therefore, to write to you about this issue? FootnoteLink They're able to offer the service now, of course. It seems that the story has been told in a way that suggests that this isn't possible at present, but it would of course be possible, and they should, in my view. Arriva have used the Welsh language on their trains although their trains travel through England; they don't physically change the language on the signage as they travel through England. So, there is no reason whatsoever why Great Western Railway shouldn't use both Welsh and English. I think that it's right to say that people would respect the fact that both languages are used, and that people in England would be very interested to see it.
Welsh: A gaf i ofyn, felly, i'r Gweinidog i ysgrifennu atoch chi ynglŷn â hynny? FootnoteLink Maen nhw'n gallu rhoi'r gwasanaeth nawr, wrth gwrs. Mae'r stori wedi cael ei dweud nad yw, mewn rhyw ffordd, yn bosib iddyn nhw ei wneud e - mae e'n hollol bosib iddyn nhw ei wneud e, ac fe ddylen nhw, yn fy marn i. Mae Arriva, wrth gwrs, dros y blynyddoedd, wedi defnyddio'r Gymraeg ar eu trenau nhw er bod y trenau'n mynd i mewn i Loegr; nid ydyn nhw'n newid yr arwyddion ar y trên, yn gorfforol, o achos y ffaith eu bod nhw'n mynd i mewn i Loegr. Felly, na, nid oes rheswm pam na ddylai Great Western Railway ddefnyddio'r Gymraeg a'r Saesneg. Rwy'n credu ei bod yn iawn i ddweud y byddai pobl yn parchu'r ffaith bod y Gymraeg yn cael ei defnyddio, a byddai diddordeb mawr gan bobl yn Lloegr i glywed yr iaith.
English: We will be consulting early next year on amendments to 'Planning Policy Wales' to prevent new opencast developments in Wales.
Welsh: Byddwn yn ymgynghori ddechrau'r flwyddyn nesaf ar welliannau i 'Polisi Cynllunio Cymru' i atal datblygiadau glo brig newydd yng Nghymru.
English: I thank the First Minister for that confirmation because, First Minister, we've seen a number of instances where companies involved in the opencast industry have failed to honour their obligation to reinstate sites, either partially or wholly, once activities have ceased. It seems incredible, then, that the company previously owning Ffos-y-fran opencast in Merthyr has been allowed to rescind its guarantee of some £15 million by Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council. The council instituted, in its place, an escrow account, which the owners will be expected to pay into, thus effectively swapping a guaranteed sum of money to one dependent on the efficacy of the new company. Is the First Minister able to shed any light on what seems to be an extraordinary decision?
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Prif Weinidog am y cadarnhad yna oherwydd, Prif Weinidog, rydym ni wedi gweld nifer o achosion lle mae cwmnïau yn y diwydiant glo brig wedi methu ag anrhydeddu eu rhwymedigaeth i adfer safleoedd, naill ai'n rhannol neu'n gyfan gwbl, ar ôl i weithgareddau ddod i ben. Mae'n ymddangos yn anhygoel, felly, y caniatawyd i'r cwmni a oedd yn berchen yn flaenorol ar safle glo brig Ffos-y-frân ym Merthyr i ddileu ei warant o tua £15 miliwn gan Gyngor Bwrdeistref Sirol Merthyr Tudful. Yn ei le, sefydlodd y Cyngor gyfrif ysgrow, y bydd disgwyl i'r perchnogion dalu i mewn iddo, gan gyfnewid i bob pwrpas swm o arian pendant am un sy'n dibynnu ar effeithiolrwydd y cwmni newydd. A all y Prif Weinidog daflu unrhyw oleuni ar yr hyn sy'n ymddangos fel penderfyniad rhyfeddol?
English: I can't. It's a matter for Merthyr council, of course. They have the responsibility for enforcement of planning. I have seen - not Ffos-y-fran - but I have seen incidences elsewhere, where opencast mining has finished, and still sites have not yet been restored. That is because, to my mind, of an issue with the bonds that companies were required to produce in the days when coal was privatised. There was, if I understand it, a limit placed on the bonds they were required to place, and those bonds are not sufficient to cover the restoration of the land in some cases. That is a historic problem, but it's a matter for Merthyr council to explain. I'm not aware of the circumstances why it is that they've taken the decision that they have.
Welsh: Na allaf. Mae'n fater i Gyngor Merthyr, wrth gwrs. Nhw sydd â'r cyfrifoldeb am orfodi cynllunio. Rwyf i wedi gweld - nid Ffos-y-frân - ond rwyf i wedi gweld achosion mewn mannau eraill, lle mae cloddio glo brig wedi gorffen, a safleoedd yn dal i fod heb eu hadfer. Mae hynny oherwydd, yn fy marn i, problem gyda'r bondiau yr oedd yn ofynnol i gwmnïau eu cynhyrchu yn y dyddiau pan breifateiddiwyd glo. Gosodwyd cyfyngiad, os rwy'n deall yn iawn, ar y bondiau yr oedd yn ofynnol iddyn nhw eu gosod, ac nid yw'r bondiau hynny'n ddigonol i dalu am adfer y tir mewn rhai achosion. Mae honno'n broblem hanesyddol, ond mater i Gyngor Merthyr yw esbonio. Nid wyf yn ymwybodol o'r amgylchiadau o ran pam maen nhw wedi gwneud y penderfyniad y maen nhw wedi'i wneud.
English: The consultation on our White Paper that outlined our proposals for a Welsh language Bill ended on 31 October. We are currently analysing the responses and we will make a further statement in due course.
Welsh: Daeth yr ymgynghoriad ar ein Papur Gwyn a oedd yn amlinellu'r cynigion ar gyfer Bil y Gymraeg i ben ar ddiwedd y mis diwethaf. Rydym ni nawr yn dadansoddi'r ymatebion ar hyn o bryd, ac fe fyddwn yn gwneud datganiad pellach yn y man.
English: First Minister, many organisations have been in touch with me in order to express concerns about your intention to abolish the role of the Welsh Language Commissioner and to weaken the fundamental rights of Welsh speakers. But, unfortunately, your Government has accused the language organisations of being too conservative. Groups such as the mentrau iaith and Mudiad Meithrin do a great deal to assist the language. Given the concerns expressed by many organisations and specialists in this area, is it now time for you to reconsider the decision to abolish the role of Welsh Language Commissioner?
Welsh: Brif Weinidog, mae nifer o fudiadau wedi cysylltu gyda fi er mwyn datgan pryder am eich bwriad i ddiddymu rôl Comisiynydd y Gymraeg a gwanhau hawliau sylfaenol siaradwyr Cymraeg. Ond, yn anffodus, mae eich Llywodraeth chi wedi cyhuddo'r mudiadau iaith o fod yn rhy geidwadol. Mae grwpiau fel mentrau iaith a'r Mudiad Meithrin yn gwneud llawer i helpu'r iaith. Yn dilyn pryderon gan nifer o fudiadau ac arbenigwyr yn y maes hwn, ydy hi'n amser i chi ailystyried y penderfyniad i ddiddymu rôl Comisiynydd y Gymraeg?
English: We've naturally consulted on the Bill itself and we're now going to analyse the responses that we've received. It's vitally important that they are considered in detail. The aim of the Government is to improve the situation and reinforce and strengthen the rights available to speakers to ensure that we can attain the target of 1 million Welsh speakers by 2050. And so what we're now doing is considering the views of organisations and other bodies to see whether we can understand their concerns.
Welsh: Rydym ni wedi ymgynghori ar y Bil ei hunan. Rydym ni nawr, wrth gwrs, yn mynd i edrych ar yr ymatebion sydd wedi dod mewn. Mae'n hollbwysig bod y materion hynny yn cael ystyriaeth fanwl. Nod y Llywodraeth yw gwella'r sefyllfa a chryfhau yr hawliau sydd ar gael gan siaradwyr er mwyn sicrhau ein bod ni'n gallu cyrraedd y targed o 1 filiwn o siaradwyr Cymraeg erbyn 2050. Ac felly beth rydym ni'n ei wneud nawr yw ystyried beth mae mudiadau a chyrff eraill wedi dweud er mwyn gweld fel yn gwmws gallwn ni ddeall eu concerns nhw.
English: Just on that point of consideration, I wonder if you can tell us whether, in examining the case for the new body to replace the language commissioner, the Government, as it says in the White Paper, needs to consider carefully how any staff might be affected and whether there will be transfers of staff. So, can you tell me whether officials have already scoped the likely cost of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981, observing changing pension and employment rights, and, specifically, the costs associated with managing individuals' data protection in line with the new regulation, and concluded that that kind of change is actually worth the money at all?
Welsh: Dim ond ar y pwynt hwnnw o ystyriaeth, tybed a allwch chi ddweud wrthym, wrth archwilio'r achos o blaid corff newydd i ddisodli Comisiynydd y Gymraeg, a oes angen i'r Llywodraeth, fel y mae'n ei ddweud yn y Papur Gwyn, ystyried yn ofalus sut y gallai unrhyw staff gael eu heffeithio a pha un a fydd trosglwyddiadau staff. Felly, a allwch chi ddweud wrthyf a yw swyddogion eisoes wedi cwmpasu cost debygol Rheoliadau Trosglwyddo Ymgymeriadau (Diogelu Cyflogaeth) 1981, gan barchu hawliau pensiwn a chyflogaeth sy'n newid, ac, yn benodol, y costau sy'n gysylltiedig â rheoli diogelu data unigolion yn unol â'r rheoliad newydd, a dod i'r casgliad bod y math hwnnw o newid mewn gwirionedd werth yr arian o gwbl?
English: Well, first of all, can I give staff assurances that, of course, when there is change, we want to make sure that they have TUPE'd over, as the phrase has it, and that we are in a situation where people can get an understanding of their situation as soon as possible, and, of course, get comfort as soon as possible. Any regulatory assessment of the Bill will follow the normal process, and Members will have the opportunity to scrutinise that.
Welsh: Wel, yn gyntaf oll, a gaf i roi sicrwydd i'r staff, wrth gwrs, pan fo newid, ein bod ni eisiau gwneud yn siŵr eu bod wedi TUPE'io drosodd, fel y mae'r ymadrodd yn ei nodi, a'n bod ni mewn sefyllfa lle gall pobl gael dealltwriaeth o'u sefyllfa cyn gynted â phosibl, ac, wrth gwrs, cael cysur cyn gynted â phosibl. Bydd unrhyw asesiad rheoleiddiol o'r Bil yn dilyn y broses arferol, a bydd Aelodau yn cael cyfle i graffu ar hwnnw.
English: The next item on our agenda is the business statement and announcement, and I call on the leader of the house - Julie James.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf ar ein hagenda, felly, yw'r datganiad a chyhoeddiad busnes, ac rwy'n galw ar arweinydd y Tŷ - Julie James.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. Not surprisingly, multiple changes have been made to this week's business. The debates on the regulated services regulations and the Children's Commissioner for Wales 2016-17 annual report, which were due to have been held last Tuesday, will take place this afternoon. The debates on the Official Statistics (Wales) Order 2017 and tackling substance misuse have been postponed until next week. I've also postponed the Stage 3 debate on the abolition of the Right to Buy and Associated Rights (Wales) Bill until 28 November. Questions tabled for answer last week by the education, health and social services secretaries will be taken tomorrow, and questions to the Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Transport and the Counsel General will move to next week. Finally, Business Committee has agreed that the Member debate and short debate postponed from last week will take place tomorrow, with the Welsh Conservative debate and the committee debate on digital infrastructure being postponed until next Wednesday. Business for the next three weeks is shown on the business statement and announcement found amongst the meeting papers, which are available to Members electronically.
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Nid yw'n syndod bod newidiadau lluosog wedi'u gwneud i fusnes yr wythnos hon. Bydd y dadleuon ar y rheoliadau gwasanaethau a reoleiddir ac adroddiad blynyddol 2016-17 Comisiynydd Plant Cymru, a oedd i fod i gael eu cynnal ddydd Mawrth diwethaf, yn cael eu cynnal y prynhawn yma. Mae'r dadleuon ar Orchymyn Ystadegau Swyddogol (Cymru) 2017 a mynd i'r afael â chamddefnyddio sylweddau wedi eu gohirio tan yr wythnos nesaf. Rwyf hefyd wedi gohirio'r ddadl Cyfnod 3 ar diddymu'r Bil Hawl i Brynu a Hawliau Cysylltiedig (Cymru) tan 28 Tachwedd. Bydd cwestiynau a gyflwynwyd ar gyfer eu hateb yr wythnos diwethaf gan yr ysgrifenyddion addysg, iechyd a gwasanaethau cymdeithasol yn cael eu derbyn yfory, a bydd cwestiynau i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros yr Economi a Thrafnidiaeth a'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol yn symud i'r wythnos nesaf. Yn olaf, mae'r Pwyllgor Busnes wedi cytuno y bydd y ddadl Aelodau a'r ddadl fer a ohiriwyd o'r wythnos diwethaf yn cael eu cynnal yfory, gyda dadl y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig a dadl y pwyllgor ar seilwaith digidol yn cael eu gohirio tan ddydd Mercher nesaf. Dangosir busnes ar gyfer y tair wythnos nesaf ar y datganiad a chyhoeddiad busnes sydd i'w weld ymhlith y papurau cyfarfod, sydd ar gael i'r Aelodau yn electronig.
English: Can I start by congratulating Julie James on her appointment as Leader of the House and Chief Whip? And can I say how delighted I am to have had the first opportunity since I was elected to this Assembly in 1999 to actually ask a question? So, I was determined I was going to get straight off the mark. Can I ask you, leader of the house, if you could respond to the latest Trussell Trust figures that show an increase of 13 per cent in the use of foodbanks between April and September of this year - 2017 - compared with the same period last year? The Vale of Glamorgan foodbank has reported on the plight of a mother they helped recently, with five children, and no food left on a Friday. The Department for Work and Pensions said they couldn't help until the following week. Can we have an update from the Welsh Government on representations being made to stall the roll-out of universal credit, given that foodbanks in areas of full universal credit roll-out have seen a 30 per cent average increase in demand?
Welsh: A gaf i ddechrau drwy longyfarch Julie James ar gael ei phenodi'n Arweinydd y Tŷ a Phrif Chwip? Ac a gaf i ddweud pa mor falch yr wyf i o gael y cyfle cyntaf ers i mi gael fy ethol i'r Cynulliad hwn ym 1999, i ofyn cwestiwn mewn gwirionedd? Felly, roeddwn i'n benderfynol fy mod i'n mynd i fynd ati ar unwaith. A gaf i ofyn ichi, Arweinydd y Tŷ, os gallech chi ymateb i ffigurau diweddaraf Ymddiriedolaeth Trussell, sy'n dangos cynnydd o 13 y cant yn y defnydd o fanciau bwyd rhwng mis Ebrill a mis Medi eleni - 2017 - o'i gymharu â'r un cyfnod y llynedd? Mae'r banc bwyd ym Mro Morgannwg wedi sôn am sefyllfa druenus mam yr oedden nhw wedi ei helpu'n ddiweddar, a chanddi bump o blant, a dim bwyd ar ôl ar ddydd Gwener. Dywedodd yr adran Gwaith a Phensiynau na allen nhw helpu tan yr wythnos ganlynol. A allwn ni gael yr wybodaeth ddiweddaraf gan Lywodraeth Cymru ar y sylwadau sy'n cael eu gwneud i ohirio cyflwyno'r credyd cynhwysol, o gofio bod y banciau bwyd mewn ardaloedd y mae credyd cynhwysol wedi'i gyflwyno'n llawn, wedi gweld cynnydd cyfartalog o 30 y cant yn y galw?