English: Thank you very much. I, of course, welcome the amended draft, and the memorandum. I do feel that there are strengths there in relation to opportunities that are presented with regard to increasing the accountability of providers. There is an opportunity to increase the understanding of the public of what can be expected, and we can also see strengths there in relation to the hope for some strategic planning - maybe more creatively and on a more structural level - of opportunities, in particular to improve in relation to developing the workforce. But - and it's a very big 'but' - the concern I have here is: are these standards really going to transform the experience of Welsh-speaking patients, who are at a disadvantage? We don't need - . The evidence is there, isn't it? We know how key an issue this is. It's not just a matter of something additional when we're talking about language; it's a very core issue in relation to the service itself. There's an opportunity here to change things and to improve the quality of care for patients in Wales. In my opinion, there are two basic weaknesses here: one in relation to the fact that the standards, as they appear at the moment, do not give the right to Welsh speakers to receive face-to-face services through the medium of Welsh. That's a very important weakness. The second issue, I would suggest, is that those standards are inconsistent in relation to what a patient could expect in Wales, because patients who have primary services, or even out-patients - . They do not have those rights. So, there are big weaknesses, most certainly, here. But, of course, improvements can be considered to the standards and that's a good thing.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr. Mae rhywun yn croesawu'r drafft diwygiedig, wrth reswm, a'r memorandwm, wrth gwrs. Rydw i'n teimlo bod yna gryfderau o safbwynt bod yna gyfle fan hyn, onid oes, i gynyddu atebolrwydd darparwyr. Mae yna gyfle i gynyddu dealltwriaeth y cyhoedd o beth sydd i ddisgwyl, a hefyd mae rhywun yn gweld bod yna gryfderau yma o ran y gobaith i gynllunio'n strategol - yn fwy creadigol, os liciwch chi, yn fwy strwythurol - cyfleon, yn enwedig i wella o safbwynt datblygu'r gweithlu. Ond - ac mae'n 'ond' mawr - y gofid sydd gen i fan hyn ydy: a ydy'r safonau yma yn wirioneddol yn mynd i wyrdroi profiadau cleifion sy'n siaradwyr Cymraeg, sydd dan anfantais? Nid ydym ni angen - . Mae'r dystiolaeth yno, gerbron, onid ydy? Rydym ni'n gwybod pa mor allweddol ydy hyn. Nid mater o rywbeth ychwanegol ydy iaith; mae'n hollol, hollol wreiddiol i'r cyfathrebu, i'r gwasanaeth ei hunain. Mae yna gyfle fan hyn i newid ac i wella ansawdd y gofal iechyd i gleifion yng Nghymru. O'n safbwynt i, yn fy marn i, beth bynnag, dau wendid sylfaenol sydd fan hyn: un o ran nad yw'r safonau, ar hyn o bryd, fel y maen nhw'n ymddangos ar hyn o bryd, yn rhoi'r cyfle, yn rhoi'r hawl ddiamod yna i siaradwyr Cymraeg dderbyn gwasanaeth wyneb yn wyneb trwy'r Gymraeg. Mae hynny'n wendid mawr. Yr ail beth y buaswn i'n ei gynnig ydy nad yw'r safonau chwaith - . Maen nhw'n anghyson o safbwynt beth y gall glaf ddisgwyl yng Nghymru, oherwydd nad ydy cleifion sydd yn derbyn gwasanaethau sylfaenol, neu hyd yn oed cleifion allanol - . Nid oes hawl yna. Felly, mae yna wendidau mawr yma. Ond mae yna fodd i ystyried gwelliannau i'r safonau a da o beth ydy hynny.