English: In terms of questions about businesses, there's absolutely no advice or suggestion that people should alter the way that they order goods within or outside the UK. That advice remains in place as it would have been before. On 111, I'm happy to confirm that there is now an all-Wales coronavirus service through the free 111 number. That's a change that we've deliberately made to have a single source, a single number, so we're not trying to ask people to go to different places in different parts of the country. There are already conversations taking place within the Government, and conversations are starting with employer organisations about either support that they might need, or indeed messages about how they're actually taking care of their own workforces as well. It's not just an issue for public services - there's a potentially more significant impact. One of the issues we discussed in our engagement across all four Governments are changes to the way that the statutory sick pay operates, because we don't want people to wait until the third day of being unwell before they then think they're going to take some time out of work. So, I think the UK Government are looking to act on that. The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care gave an indication of that when he was answering questions in the House of Commons with the Labour spokesperson today. On legislation, as I said in the statement, we are looking at the possibility of legislation. If we were to need to legislate, bearing in mind the advice we've had from the four chief medical officers and from SAGE - a group I'll return to shortly. SAGE is not a herb in this instance - it is the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies - and that's a key resource providing scientific advice to the four UK Governments. If we were to see the sort of peak in the virus that is possible, that could be starting from about May/June, when you might see a peak. If we were to need emergency powers, then we'd need to have them in place before then, which would realistically mean that we would need to have passed that legislation before Easter recess in Parliaments across the UK. That means that, from our point of view, if we were to have a single piece of UK-wide legislation, we would have needed to have considered a legislative consent motion before we go into recess itself. So, there isn't a significant period of time, but in the conversations that I've had, both with the health spokespeople from the Conservatives and Plaid Cymru, I've indicated that, as soon as we're in a position to be more definitive about that, I'll confirm that. I'll make sure technical briefings are available. I've already offered the Chair of the health committee an opportunity to have a briefing with the Chief Medical Officer for Wales - a broader update on the position. And if we get to the position where we think legislation is the right answer, and we have the shape of it, then I'll try to make sure that a technical briefing is available from the chief medical officer and officials about what that Bill will contain and the rationale behind it as well. But again, to reiterate my point that the very clear expectation is that devolved powers remain the responsibility of Ministers in the three national devolved Governments. Now, in terms of how to exercise those powers, then we're very clear that we want to be led by the science and the advice we get from the chief medical officer is about which powers may need to be exercised. Ultimately, Ministers still have to decide. And equally, when those powers are no longer required as well. But if there were to be legislation, I'm sure that people in all of the Parliaments in the UK would want to understand when powers would start, but also when they would end. In the Civil Contingencies Bill, for example, the powers need to be reviewed and renewed every seven days. That may not be appropriate if we do face a pandemic that may last several months. But there is a point there, and I expect it will come up properly in scrutiny as well. And the point is well made. In terms of looking after our staff, well we have protective equipment for staff who are undertaking testing and treatment, and we have the appropriate protective equipment available for staff to continue to do so. We are taking seriously staff well-being, but also if there were to be a significant challenge, then if there are significant numbers of people in the workplace who are absent from work because they're unwell, that would affect part of our health service workforce as well. So, we are thinking through potential scenarios where, if there is reduced workforce, not just about the potential opportunity to reintroduce those retired health and care professionals who are willing to return, and what that means for a regulatory point of view, in terms of adding numbers. Because money may not provide us with lots of extra members of staff - it's actually about the willingness of people with the ability to return and to have the appropriate regulatory clearance to do so. On primary care, you've already heard the First Minister indicate that we're already actively considering the potential to reduce some of the reporting arrangements, and that should be familiar. I think it was two winters ago that I decided to do so during winter for primary care to ease pressure. That gave them more time, and we're also able to have regular and understandable means for which they would continue to be paid a predictable amount on doing so. In terms of your point about regular advice for people with chronic conditions who may need to attend, we're not at the point in time where those people need to behave differently, but we may get to the point where that is one of the things that we contemplate. Those people don't need to be concerned now, but should there be a more significant community transfer of coronavirus, we will need to consider and potentially to give further advice at that point in time. Officials in each portfolio are working across the Government. We stood up our own emergency arrangements. The Cabinet had a briefing from me - we've mentioned it before, but there was a specific briefing yesterday. The Cabinet will be meeting again later this week to consider this specifically, and we'll look at arrangements between Ministers to effectively stand up our own emergency arrangements. I think the initials are EWCC, but to put it in more understandable terms, our own COBRA Cymru arrangements are ready to stand up as well. I'd like to finish by thanking you both for your support and for your constructive approach in our previous conversations and here. There will be, of course, questions you will want to ask throughout the time, but I think it is important that we try to take an approach that is led by the evidence and stay as calm as we want the public to remain in the face of a novel threat to public health across the UK.
Welsh: O ran cwestiynau am fusnesau, nid oes unrhyw gyngor nac awgrym o gwbl y dylai pobl newid y ffordd y maen nhw'n archebu nwyddau yn y DU neu'r tu allan iddi. Mae'r cyngor hwnnw'n dal ar waith fel y byddai wedi bod o'r blaen. O ran 111, rwy'n hapus i gadarnhau bod yna bellach wasanaeth coronafeirws Cymru gyfan drwy'r rhif 111, am ddim. Dyna newid yr ydym ni wedi'i wneud yn fwriadol i gael un ffynhonnell, un rhif, felly nid ydym yn gofyn i bobl fynd i wahanol leoedd mewn gwahanol rannau o'r wlad. Mae sgyrsiau eisoes yn cael eu cynnal yn y Llywodraeth, ac mae sgyrsiau'n dechrau ymysg sefydliadau sy'n cyflogi ynghylch y cymorth sydd ei angen arnynt, neu'n wir negeseuon ynghylch sut y maen nhw'n gofalu am eu gweithluoedd eu hunain hefyd. Nid mater i wasanaethau cyhoeddus yn unig yw hyn - mae effaith fwy sylweddol o bosib. Un o'r materion a drafodwyd gennym ni wrth inni ymwneud â phob un o'r pedair Llywodraeth yw newidiadau i'r ffordd y mae'r tâl salwch statudol yn gweithredu, oherwydd nid ydym eisiau i bobl aros tan y trydydd diwrnod o salwch cyn iddyn nhw ystyried wedyn bod yn rhaid iddyn nhw gymryd peth amser o'u gwaith. Felly, rwy'n credu bod Llywodraeth y DU yn bwriadu gweithredu ar hynny. Rhoddodd yr Ysgrifennydd Gwladol dros Iechyd a Gofal Cymdeithasol arwydd o hynny pan oedd yn ateb cwestiynau yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin gyda llefarydd Llafur heddiw. O ran deddfwriaeth, fel y dywedais yn y datganiad, rydym yn edrych ar y posibilrwydd o ddeddfwriaeth. Pe bai angen i ni ddeddfu, gan gofio'r cyngor yr ydym ni wedi'i gael gan y pedwar prif swyddog meddygol a chan SAGE - grŵp y dychwelaf ato cyn bo hir. Nid perlysieuyn yw SAGE yn yr achos hwn - ond y 'Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies' - ac mae hwnnw'n adnodd allweddol sy'n darparu cyngor gwyddonol i bedair Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig. Pe baem yn gweld y math o uchafbwynt o ran y feirws, sy'n bosib, gallai hynny ddechrau tua mis Mai/Mehefin, pan allech chi weld uchafbwynt. Pe bai angen pwerau brys arnom ni, byddai angen inni eu rhoi ar waith cyn hynny, a fyddai'n golygu, i fod yn realistig, y byddai angen inni fod wedi pasio'r ddeddfwriaeth honno cyn toriad Pasg y seneddau ledled y DU. Mae hynny'n golygu, o'n safbwynt ni, pe baem ni'n cael un darn o ddeddfwriaeth i'r DU gyfan, byddai wedi bod angen inni ystyried cynnig cydsyniad deddfwriaethol cyn y toriad ei hun. Felly, nid oes cyfnod sylweddol o amser, ond yn y sgyrsiau rwyf wedi'u cael, gyda llefarwyr iechyd y Ceidwadwyr a Phlaid Cymru, rwyf wedi dweud, cyn gynted ag y byddwn mewn sefyllfa i fod yn fwy pendant ynghylch hynny, y byddaf yn cadarnhau hynny. Byddaf yn sicrhau bod gwybodaeth dechnegol ar gael. Rwyf eisoes wedi cynnig cyfle i Gadeirydd y pwyllgor iechyd gael sesiwn friffio gyda Phrif Swyddog Meddygol Cymru - diweddariad ehangach ar y sefyllfa. Ac os byddwn ni'n cyrraedd y sefyllfa pryd yr ydym ni'n credu mai deddfwriaeth yw'r ateb cywir, a bod gennym ni ffurf hynny, yna byddaf yn ceisio sicrhau bod briff technegol ar gael gan y Prif Swyddog Meddygol a'r swyddogion ynglŷn â'r hyn y bydd y Bil yn ei gynnwys a'r rhesymeg y tu ôl iddo hefyd. Ond eto, i ailadrodd fy mhwynt mai'r disgwyliad clir iawn yw bod pwerau datganoledig yn parhau i fod yn gyfrifoldeb i Weinidogion yn y tair Llywodraeth ddatganoledig genedlaethol. Nawr, o ran sut i arfer y pwerau hynny, rydym yn glir iawn ein bod eisiau cael ein harwain gan y wyddoniaeth a'r cyngor a gawn ni gan y prif swyddog meddygol o ran pa bwerau y gall fod angen eu harfer. Yn y pen draw, y Gweinidogion sydd i benderfynu o hyd. Ac yn yr un modd, pan nad oes angen y pwerau hynny bellach hefyd. Ond pe bai yna ddeddfwriaeth, rwy'n siŵr y byddai pobl ym mhob un o'r seneddau yn y DU eisiau deall pryd y byddai pwerau'n dechrau, ond hefyd pryd y byddent yn dod i ben. Yn y Bil Paratoadau Sifil, er enghraifft, mae angen i'r pwerau gael eu hadolygu a'u hadnewyddu bob saith diwrnod. Efallai na fydd hynny'n briodol os wynebwn ni bandemig a allai barhau am nifer o fisoedd. Ond mae'n sylw pwysig, ac rwy'n disgwyl y caiff sylw priodol wrth graffu hefyd. Ac mae'r sylw yn un priodol. O ran gofalu am ein staff, wel mae gennym ni offer amddiffynnol ar gyfer staff sy'n profi a thrin, ac mae gennym ni'r offer amddiffynnol priodol ar gael i staff barhau i wneud hynny. Rydym yn cymryd lles staff o ddifrif, ond hefyd pe byddai her sylweddol, yna os oes nifer sylweddol o bobl yn y gweithle sy'n absennol o'r gwaith am eu bod yn sâl, byddai hynny'n effeithio ar ran o weithlu ein gwasanaeth iechyd hefyd. Felly, rydym yn ystyried sefyllfaoedd posib pryd, os oes llai o weithlu, bod angen gwneud mwy na dim ond rhoi'r cyfle i weithwyr iechyd a gofal proffesiynol sydd wedi ymddeol sy'n barod i ddychwelyd i wneud hynny os ydynt yn fodlon, a beth mae hynny'n ei olygu o ran rheoleiddio, yn nhermau rhifau. Oherwydd efallai na all arian roi llawer o aelodau staff ychwanegol inni - mae'n ymwneud mewn gwirionedd â pharodrwydd pobl sydd â'r gallu i ddychwelyd a chael y cliriad rheoliadol priodol i wneud hynny. O ran gofal sylfaenol, rydych chi eisoes wedi clywed y Prif Weinidog yn dweud ein bod eisoes yn ystyried a oes modd lleihau rhai o'r trefniadau adrodd, a dylai hynny fod yn gyfarwydd. Rwy'n credu mai dau aeaf yn ôl y penderfynais wneud hynny yn ystod y gaeaf ar gyfer gofal sylfaenol er mwyn ysgafnhau'r pwysau. Rhoddodd hynny fwy o amser iddyn nhw, ac fe allwn ni hefyd gael dulliau rheolaidd a dealladwy i sicrhau y byddent yn parhau i gael swm rhagweladwy ar gyfer gwneud hynny. O ran eich sylw am gyngor rheolaidd i bobl â chyflyrau cronig y gallai fod angen iddynt fynd i'w meddygfa, nid ydym ni wedi cyrraedd adeg pryd mae angen i'r bobl hynny wneud unrhyw beth yn wahanol, ond efallai y down i'r adeg pryd bydd hynny'n un o'r pethau y byddwn yn eu hystyried. Nid oes angen i'r bobl hynny boeni yn awr, ond pe bai trosglwyddiad cymunedol mwy sylweddol o'r coronafeirws, bydd angen i ni ystyried ac o bosib rhoi cyngor pellach bryd hynny. Mae swyddogion ym mhob portffolio yn gweithio ar draws y Llywodraeth. Rydym ni wedi cynyddu ein trefniadau brys ein hunain. Cafodd y Cabinet frîff gennyf - rydym ni wedi sôn amdano o'r blaen, ond cafwyd sesiwn friffio benodol ddoe. Bydd y Cabinet yn cyfarfod eto yn ddiweddarach yr wythnos hon i ystyried hyn yn benodol, a byddwn yn edrych ar drefniadau rhwng Gweinidogion i gynyddu ein trefniadau brys ein hunain yn effeithiol. Rwy'n credu mai EWCC yw'r byrfodd, ond i'w roi mewn termau mwy dealladwy, mae ein trefniadau COBRA Cymru ein hunain yn barod hefyd. Hoffwn orffen drwy ddiolch i'r ddau ohonoch chi am eich cefnogaeth ac am eich agwedd adeiladol yn ein sgyrsiau blaenorol ac yn y fan yma. Wrth gwrs, bydd cwestiynau y byddwch wastad eisiau eu holi, ond credaf ei bod hi'n bwysig ein bod yn ceisio mynd ati mewn modd sy'n seiliedig ar dystiolaeth ac aros mor ddigynnwrf ag yr ydym ni eisiau i'r cyhoedd aros yn wyneb bygythiad newydd i iechyd y cyhoedd ledled y DU.