English: Diolch, Deputy Presiding Officer. Achieving the new targets will be a huge challenge, but the cost of action is far outweighed by the cost of inaction, and the new pathway effectively brings forward our existing 80 per cent target by 15 years to 2035. Janet Finch Saunders says there's a lack of ambition; well, I don't see that lack of ambition at all. I think this Welsh Government has displayed very bold and decisive action. The changes required will affect every person, every home, every workplace, and will be really dramatic. I think Jenny Rathbone recognised that when she said that Government couldn't do this on its own. If I can just pick up a couple of points from Mike Hedges, the Chair of the CCERA committee, I don't recognise any of the points regarding lack of consultation; they were all spelled out in the statement and the engagement plan - and consultation on specific policy areas as well. So, I think there is, obviously, the commitment to do that. I think the response to the committee doesn't refuse to consult on the plan. We've agreed the need to work very closely with Senedd committees to maximise engagement, and obviously having an all-Wales plan means that people have an opportunity to directly input, as well as to shape the national plan. Janet Finch-Saunders doesn't seem to understand that our emissions profile is very different to that of England and Scotland, and that's why we have different dates. Llyr Huws Gruffydd missed the point; we've brought forward earlier dates based on evidence and ambition, not just ambition alone. That's a robust way, I think, of proceeding, and we're the only part of the UK to bring forward an earlier date since the 2019 advice. We are leading the way. As you referred to, I went back to the Climate Change Committee when they came forward with the 95 per cent that they thought we could achieve by 2050 and asked them to look at how we could achieve net zero. Many of the examples that Llyr Huws Gruffydd gave of earlier net zero dates were not in legislation. They were ambitions. Of course, we share the ambition to go faster as well, but this is about setting the legal backstop. The next Government must build on the work we've started to ensure these changes are shared fairly across our society and all regions of Wales, and they must use the recovery and the reconstruction from the pandemic to make the 2020s the decisive decade for climate action. I'm grateful to Members who have indicated support for these regulations today. I think what that will do is really add to the momentum that we have here in Wales for our contribution to global warming - by giving their support for these regulations today and setting Wales's first net-zero goal. Diolch.
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Bydd cyrraedd y targedau newydd yn her enfawr, ond mae cost gweithredu yn cael ei orbwyso'n sylweddol gan gost diffyg gweithredu, ac mae'r llwybr newydd i bob pwrpas yn dod â'n targed presennol o 80 y cant ymlaen gan 15 mlynedd i 2035. Mae Janet Finch Saunders yn dweud bod diffyg uchelgais; wel, nid wyf i'n gweld y diffyg uchelgais hwnnw o gwbl. Rwy'n credu bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi dangos camau beiddgar a phendant iawn. Bydd y newidiadau sydd eu hangen yn effeithio ar bob person, pob cartref, pob gweithle, a bydd yn ddramatig iawn. Rwy'n credu bod Jenny Rathbone wedi cydnabod hynny pan ddywedodd na allai'r Llywodraeth wneud hyn ar ei phen ei hun. Os gaf i godi ychydig o'r pwyntiau gan Mike Hedges, Cadeirydd y Pwyllgor Newid Hinsawdd, Amgylchedd a Materion Gwledig, nid wyf i'n cydnabod unrhyw un o'r pwyntiau ynglŷn â diffyg ymgynghori; cawson nhw i gyd eu hamlygu yn y datganiad a'r cynllun ymgysylltu - ac ymgynghori ar feysydd polisi penodol hefyd. Felly, rwy'n credu bod yna ymrwymiad, yn amlwg, i wneud hynny. Dydw i ddim yn credu bod yr ymateb i'r pwyllgor yn gwrthod ymgynghori ar y cynllun. Rydym ni wedi cytuno bod angen gweithio'n agos iawn gyda phwyllgorau'r Senedd i wneud y gorau o ymgysylltu, ac mae'n amlwg bod cael cynllun Cymru gyfan yn golygu bod gan bobl y cyfle i gyfrannu'n uniongyrchol, yn ogystal â llunio'r cynllun cenedlaethol. Nid yw'n ymddangos bod Janet Finch-Saunders yn deall bod ein proffil allyriadau yn wahanol iawn i broffil Lloegr a'r Alban, a dyna pam mae gennym ni ddyddiadau gwahanol. Collodd Llyr Huws Gruffydd y pwynt; rydym ni wedi cyflwyno dyddiadau cynharach yn seiliedig ar dystiolaeth ac uchelgais, nid dim ond uchelgais yn unig. Mae hynny'n ffordd gadarn, rwy'n meddwl, o fwrw ymlaen, a ni yw'r unig ran o'r DU i gyflwyno dyddiad cynharach ers cyngor 2019. Rydym ni'n arwain y ffordd. Fel y gwnaethoch chi gyfeirio ato, es i yn ôl at y Pwyllgor Ar y Newid yn yr Hinsawdd pan gyflwynon nhw'r 95 y cant yr oedden nhw'n credu y gallem ni ei gyflawni erbyn 2050 a gofyn iddyn nhw edrych ar sut y gallem ni gyflawni sero-net. Nid oedd llawer o'r enghreifftiau a roddodd Llyr Huws Gruffydd o ddyddiadau sero-net cynharach mewn deddfwriaeth. Uchelgeisiau oedden nhw. Wrth gwrs, rydym ni'n rhannu'r uchelgais i fynd yn gyflymach hefyd, ond mae hyn yn ymwneud â gosod yr ôl-stop cyfreithiol. Bydd yn rhaid i'r Llywodraeth nesaf ddatblygu'r gwaith yr ydym ni wedi'i ddechrau i sicrhau bod y newidiadau hyn yn cael eu rhannu'n deg ledled ein cymdeithas a phob rhanbarth yng Nghymru, a bydd yn rhaid iddyn nhw ddefnyddio'r adfer a'r ailadeiladu rhag y pandemig i wneud y 2020au yn ddegawd pendant ar gyfer gweithredu o ran yr hinsawdd. Rwy'n ddiolchgar i'r Aelodau sydd wedi nodi cefnogaeth i'r rheoliadau hyn heddiw. rwy'n credu bod yr hyn y bydd hynny'n ei wneud yn ychwanegu'n wirioneddol at y momentwm sydd gennym ni yma yng Nghymru o ran ein cyfraniad at gynhesu byd-eang - drwy roi eu cefnogaeth i'r rheoliadau hyn heddiw a gosod nod sero-net cyntaf Cymru. Diolch.