English: Thank you very much, David Melding. You know that I share all of your concern and your outrage on behalf of your constituents. We have asked the UK Government to consider a number of measures in the building safety Bill, not least extending the contractual obligation period for developers and subcontractors, which is causing such a legal problem for people in these buildings where their contractual period has expired, and that's a very common problem, just as one example. I also agree with you that the UK Government - well, actually, it's a personal view, but my own view is that the only thing is a windfall tax to put on the developers is to make the fund big enough to cover off all of the problems, because the current funds that we're looking at don't touch the surface of it. Also, you've identified the issue that removing the cladding only exposes the other problems that most of the buildings have, and so we're currently exploring with the fund for Wales what we can do to ensure that a range of building problems are fixed, the compartmentation being the biggest one of them, and, of course, the way that the cladding is held onto the building. We have funded the removal and replacement of all of the cladding and systems in the houses for social rent here, and we're exploring a way to do that amid the complexities of who is responsible for what in the buildings we know are affected in Wales. But we have, rest assured, lobbied the UK Government. I've also asked a number of Welsh MPs to do the same, and I'd be very grateful if Members of the Senedd would do that as well, as the UK building safety Bill proceeds on its way through Parliament.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, David Melding. Gwyddoch fy mod yn rhannu eich pryder a'ch dicter ar ran eich etholwyr. Rydym ni wedi gofyn i Lywodraeth y DU ystyried nifer o fesurau yn y Bil diogelwch adeiladau, yn enwedig ymestyn y cyfnod rhwymedigaeth gytundebol ar gyfer datblygwyr ac isgontractwyr, sy'n achosi cymaint o broblem gyfreithiol i bobl yn yr adeiladau hyn lle mae eu cyfnod cytundebol wedi dod i ben, ac mae hynny'n broblem gyffredin iawn, ac yn un enghraifft yn unig. Cytunaf â chi fod Llywodraeth y DU - wel, mewn gwirionedd, barn bersonol yw hyn, ond fy marn i yw mai'r unig beth i'w wneud yw rhoi treth annisgwyl ar y datblygwyr i wneud y gronfa'n ddigon mawr i dalu am yr holl broblemau, oherwydd nid yw'r arian presennol sydd ar gael yn ddigonol o bell ffordd. Hefyd, rydych wedi nodi'r broblem fod cael gwared ar y cladin dim ond yn amlygu'r problemau eraill sydd gan y rhan fwyaf o'r adeiladau, ac felly rydym ni wrthi'n archwilio gyda'r gronfa i Gymru yr hyn y gallwn ni ei wneud i sicrhau y bydd yr ystod o broblemau adeiladau'n cael eu datrys, y rhannu i adrannau yw'r un mwyaf ohonyn nhw, ac, wrth gwrs, y ffordd y caiff y cladin ei ddal ar yr adeilad. Rydym wedi ariannu'r gwaith o ddileu a disodli'r holl gladin a systemau yn y tai rhent cymdeithasol yma, ac rydym yn chwilio am ffordd o wneud hynny yng nghanol cymhlethdodau megis pwy sy'n gyfrifol am beth yn yr adeiladau y gwyddom yr effeithir arnyn nhw yng Nghymru. Ond rydym ni, gallwch fod yn dawel eich meddwl, wedi lobïo Llywodraeth y DU. Rwyf hefyd wedi gofyn i nifer o Aelodau Seneddol Cymru wneud yr un peth, a byddwn yn ddiolchgar iawn pe bai Aelodau'r Senedd yn gwneud hynny hefyd, wrth i Fil diogelwch adeiladau'r DU fynd ar ei hynt drwy'r Senedd.