techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: The First Minister has established the Commission on Justice in Wales to provide an expert, independent, long-term view. It has started work and has issued a call for evidence. I urge everyone with an interest to contribute.
Welsh: Mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi sefydlu'r Comisiwn ar Gyfiawnder yng Nghymru i ddarparu barn arbenigol, annibynnol a hirdymor. Mae wedi dechrau ar y gwaith ac mae wedi cyhoeddi galwad am dystiolaeth. Rwy'n annog pawb sydd â diddordeb i gyfrannu.
English: A month into his appointment as Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas gave a lecture in which he said that European lawyers looked at England and Wales with admiration of our legal system for its independence, for its professionalism and for the fact that it has been the essential underpinning of our democratic way of life, and our general prosperity for hundreds of years. While many of us recognise the logic of jurisdiction following legislature and know that our present position is anomalous, does the Counsel General agree that the commission offers the right approach to ensure careful consideration and a degree of caution before seeking to separate or distinguish ourselves from a shared jurisdiction as successful as Lord Thomas described?
Welsh: Fis wedi iddo gael ei benodi'n Arglwydd Brif Ustus, rhoddodd yr Arglwydd Thomas ddarlith yn dweud bod cyfreithwyr Ewrop yn edmygu system gyfreithiol Cymru a Lloegr oherwydd ei hannibyniaeth, ei phroffesiynoldeb a'r ffaith ei bod wedi bod yn sylfaen hanfodol i'n ffordd ddemocrataidd o fyw, ac i'n ffyniant cyffredinol ers cannoedd o flynyddoedd. Er bod llawer ohonom yn gyfarwydd â rhesymeg awdurdodaeth yn dilyn deddfwrfa ac yn gwybod bod ein sefyllfa bresennol yn un anarferol, a yw'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol yn cytuno bod y comisiwn yn cynnig y dull cywir i sicrhau ystyriaeth ofalus a rhywfaint o bwyll cyn ceisio gwahanu neu neilltuo ein hunain oddi wrth awdurdodaeth a rennir sy'n gymaint o lwyddiant â'r un a ddisgrifiwyd gan yr Arglwydd Thomas?
English: The Member acknowledges that the issue isn't straightforward. There are divergent views on this issue. He will be aware of the Welsh Government's position, as set forth in the Government of Wales draft Bill that itself put in the public domain. It is perfectly evident that being the only legislature that we can think of that does not have its own jurisdiction poses very significant challenges, and very significant constraints on the exercise of the devolved powers that we have, and in fact has shaped the devolution settlement in a way that is not helpful to the people of Wales. Had we had different jurisdictional arrangements, then some of the limitations that we face would not be in place and we would be able to use our powers more broadly and, perhaps, more effectively in some areas. So, I think it has to be seen against that backdrop. There are many ways of ensuring that we maintain the current dependability, reliability and reputation of the jurisdiction that we exercise here in Wales, as well as that exercised in England. None of that is imperilled by a distinct or separate jurisdiction, and I think part of the journey that we're on in this commission is to explain and consider that in a way that is expert and independent, and underpins a better understanding amongst people in Wales of the virtues of having a distinct and, in due course, a separate jurisdiction.
Welsh: Mae'r Aelod yn cydnabod nad yw'r mater yn un syml. Ceir sawl safbwynt gwahanol ynglŷn â'r mater hwn. Fe fydd yn ymwybodol o safbwynt Llywodraeth Cymru, fel y'i nodir ym Mil drafft Llywodraeth Cymru sydd ar gael i'r cyhoedd. Fel yr unig ddeddfwrfa y gallwn feddwl amdani nad oes ganddi ei hawdurdodaeth ei hun, mae'n berffaith amlwg fod hynny'n peri heriau sylweddol iawn, a chyfyngiadau sylweddol iawn ar weithredu ein pwerau datganoledig, ac mewn gwirionedd mae hynny wedi siapio'r setliad datganoli mewn ffordd nad yw'n ddefnyddiol i bobl Cymru. Pe baem wedi cael trefniadau awdurdodaethol gwahanol, ni fyddai rhai o'r cyfyngiadau sy'n ein hwynebu yn bodoli, a byddai modd inni ddefnyddio ein pwerau'n fwy cyffredinol, ac efallai, yn fwy effeithiol mewn rhai meysydd. Felly, credaf fod angen ystyried hynny yn y cyd-destun hwn. Mae sawl ffordd o sicrhau ein bod yn cynnal dibynadwyedd, sicrwydd ac enw da'r awdurdodaeth a weithredir gennym yma yng Nghymru, yn ogystal â'r hyn a weithredir yn Lloegr. Ni pheryglir dim o hynny gan awdurdodaeth neilltuol neu ar wahân, a chredaf mai rhan o'r daith rydym arni gyda'r comisiwn hwn yw esbonio ac ystyried hynny mewn ffordd sy'n arbenigol ac yn annibynnol, ac sy'n sail i well dealltwriaeth ymhlith pobl yng Nghymru o rinweddau awdurdodaeth neilltuol, ac awdurdodaeth ar wahân maes o law.
English: The First Minister has said that he wants a different justice system for Wales, in an answer given over the past few weeks, but the Government policy isn't clear on new prisons here in Wales. The First Minister tends to be more willing to accept that than the new Minister, Alun Davies. What discussions has the commission had in the context of the fact that, if there were to be a new prison here in Wales, and if there were to be more demand for more prisoners from outwith Wales to go to that prison rather than prisoners from Wales itself, how could we create a uniquely and inherently Welsh policy in the context of the fact that people from various different areas of Britain would be coming to prisons in Wales?
Welsh: Mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi dweud ei fod e eisiau cael system droseddol wahanol i Gymru, mewn ateb yn yr wythnosau diwethaf, ond nid yw polisi y Llywodraeth hon yn glir iawn ynglŷn â charchardai newydd yma yng Nghymru. Mae'r Prif Weinidog yn dueddol o fod yn fwy parod i dderbyn hynny na'r Gweinidog newydd, Alun Davies. Pa drafodaethau mae'r comisiwn wedi eu cael yng nghyd-destun y ffaith, petasai yna garchar newydd yma yng Nghymru, a phe byddai yna fwy o ofyn am bobl o'r tu allan i Gymru i fynd i'r carchar hynny na phobl o Gymru ei hun, sut fyddai modd creu polisi cynhenid unigryw i Gymru yng nghyd-destun y ffaith bod pobl o wahanol ardaloedd o Brydain yn mynd i fod yn dod i garchardai yng Nghymru?
English: I noted the content of the debate that Jenny Rathbone brought forward in the past few days, and the Member's contribution to that debate in that context. The commission has sought evidence from people in the context of the criminal justice system, and I would urge the Member, and others, to contribute to that. The Cabinet Secretary, in his response to the debate, said how important it was to have a criminal justice system that suited the needs of the people of Wales, and to note the particular needs of prisoners in Wales. The example given was that there wasn't a women's prison in Wales, and that we needed a completely different policy for Wales, rather than the one being followed by the Government in Westminster. So, I hope that there will be developments in that field from that point of view, and certainly from the point of view of prisons, that we need a specific long-term policy for the needs of Wales.
Welsh: Fe wnes i nodi cynnwys y ddadl a ddaeth ymlaen yn enw Jenny Rathbone ar y testun hwn yn y dyddiau diwethaf, a chyfraniad yr Aelod yn y cyd-destun hwnnw. Mae'r comisiwn wedi galw am dystiolaeth wrth bobl yng nghyd-destun y system droseddol, felly byddwn i'n annog yr Aelod, ac eraill, i gyfrannu at y cwestiwn hwnnw. Gwnaeth Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, yn ei ateb i'r ddadl, sôn am ba mor bwysig oedd hi i gael system droseddol a oedd yn gymwys i anghenion pobl yng Nghymru, ac i nodweddion penodol carcharorion yng Nghymru. Rhoddodd e'r enghraifft nad oes carchardai ar gyfer menywod yng Nghymru - bod angen polisi sydd yn lot fwy gwahanol yng Nghymru nag y mae'r Llywodraeth yn ei ddilyn yn San Steffan. Felly, rwy'n gobeithio y bydd datblygiadau yn y maes hwnnw, ac yn sicr, o safbwynt carchardai, fod angen polisi penodol yn yr hir dymor ar gyfer anghenion Cymru.
English: I thank the Member for his question. Wales currently meets the legal limits for almost all air pollutants, but faces significant challenges in reducing levels of nitrogen dioxide. I fully support the Welsh Government's commitment to improving air quality across Wales, including various initiatives to tackle air pollution to ensure compliance with the relevant statutory duties.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am ei gwestiwn. Ar hyn o bryd, mae Cymru'n bodloni'r terfynau cyfreithiol ar gyfer pob llygrydd aer, bron â bod, ond rydym yn wynebu heriau sylweddol o ran lleihau lefelau nitrogen deuocsid. Rwy'n llwyr gefnogi ymrwymiad Llywodraeth Cymru i wella ansawdd aer ledled Cymru, gan gynnwys amrywiaeth o fentrau i fynd i'r afael â llygredd aer er mwyn sicrhau cydymffurfiaeth â'r dyletswyddau statudol perthnasol.
English: Thank you for that answer, Counsel General. According to guidance set out by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Department for Transport, so-called charging authorities can establish clean-air zones under the Transport Act 2000. Now, as he will know, the Wales Act 2017 exempts only trunk road charging schemes and matters relating to the Traffic Management Act 2004 from its list of reserved transport powers. So, does the Counsel General, therefore, foresee any difficulties in establishing clean-air zones in Wales, especially when they include roads that are not trunk roads?
Welsh: Diolch am eich ateb, Gwnsler Cyffredinol. Yn ôl y canllawiau a nodir gan Adran yr Amgylchedd, Bwyd a Materion Gwledig a'r Adran Drafnidiaeth, gall awdurdodau codi tâl, fel y'u gelwir, sefydlu parthau aer glân o dan Ddeddf Trafnidiaeth 2000. Nawr, fel y gŵyr, dim ond y cynlluniau codi tâl ar gefnffyrdd a materion sy'n ymwneud â Deddf Rheoli Traffig 2004 a esemptir gan Ddeddf Cymru 2017 oddi ar ei rhestr o bwerau trafnidiaeth a gedwir yn ôl. Felly, a yw'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol yn rhagweld unrhyw anawsterau wrth sefydlu parthau aer glân yng Nghymru, yn enwedig pan fônt yn cynnwys ffyrdd nad ydynt yn gefnffyrdd?
English: Well, the Member will be aware that the Welsh Government intends to consult on a clean-air zone framework, by the end of April 2018, which will set out the principles for operating clean-air zones in Wales, and as a means of accelerating compliance where it's needed, and helping to reduce pollution more widely. I know from previous questions that he's asked that he's paid close attention to the High Court litigation recently, in relation to nitrogen dioxide levels generally. He'll know that an undertaking was given to the court to bring forward a plan to consult on clean-air zones by the end of April, and to introduce a framework by the end of July this year.
Welsh: Wel, bydd yr Aelod yn ymwybodol fod Llywodraeth Cymru yn bwriadu ymgynghori ar fframwaith parth aer glân erbyn diwedd mis Ebrill 2018 a fydd yn nodi'r egwyddorion ar gyfer gweithredu parthau aer glân yng Nghymru, ac fel modd o sbarduno cydymffurfiaeth lle bo angen, a chynorthwyo i leihau llygredd yn fwy cyffredinol. Gwn o gwestiynau blaenorol a ofynnodd ei fod wedi rhoi cryn dipyn o sylw i ymgyfreitha'r Uchel Lys yn ddiweddar, mewn perthynas â lefelau nitrogen deuocsid yn gyffredinol. Bydd yn ymwybodol fod ymrwymiad wedi'i wneud gerbron y llys i gyflwyno cynllun i ymgynghori ar barthau aer glân erbyn diwedd mis Ebrill, ac i gyflwyno fframwaith erbyn diwedd mis Gorffennaf eleni.
English: I am aware of the statement of opinion tabled last week in the names of Jenny Rathbone and Julie Morgan, and that the Member had subscribed to that statement. I was in the Chamber yesterday to hear a question posed to the First Minister on this topic also. In Scotland, pregnant women can take the second stage of a medical abortion at home. However, this position has recently been challenged by the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, and we here will keep an eye on the position in Scotland. FootnoteLink
Welsh: Rwy'n ymwybodol o'r datganiad barn a gafodd ei gyflwyno yr wythnos diwethaf, yn enwau Jenny Rathbone a Julie Morgan, a bod yr Aelod wedi tanysgrifio i'r datganiad hwnnw. Ac roeddwn i yn y Siambr ddoe i glywed cwestiwn i'r Prif Weinidog ar y testun hwn hefyd. Yn yr Alban, mae menywod beichiog yn gallu cymryd ail gam erthyliad meddygol yn eu cartrefi, ond mae'r sefyllfa hon yn ddiweddar wedi cael ei herio gan SPUC, a byddwn ni yma yn cadw golwg ar y sefyllfa yn yr Alban. FootnoteLink
English: Thank you for that response, Counsel General. I am of the opinion, as is outlined in the statement of opinion, that we should take a medical approach to this issue, rather than a legal approach that is based on old law emerging from some of the ethical debates that were taking place over half a century ago. I think we are now looking at this through a medical lens, and what is best for the woman, and what is best for health. So, my understanding is, as has just been mentioned by the Counsel General, that there is some legal doubt as to some aspects of this, and, if so, do we need greater clarity on the legal position here in Wales, and does the Government have any intention to tackle that issue?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ymateb, Cwnsler Cyffredinol. Rwyf i o'r farn, fel y mae e newydd ei amlinellu yn y datganiad barn, y dylid cymryd agwedd feddygol tuag at hyn, yn hytrach nag agwedd gyfreithiol sydd wedi ei seilio ar hen gyfraith yn deillio o rai o'r trafodaethau moesegol a oedd yn digwydd dros hanner canrif yn ôl. Erbyn hyn, rwy'n credu ein bod ni'n edrych ar hwn drwy bersbectif, a thrwy lygaid, meddygol, a beth sydd orau ar gyfer y fenyw, a beth sydd orau ar gyfer iechyd. Felly, fy nealltwriaeth i, fel sydd newydd gael ei grybwyll gan y Cwnsler Cyffredinol, yw bod yna amheuaeth gyfreithiol ynglŷn ag agwedd ar hyn, ac, os felly, a oes angen bod yn fwy eglur ynglŷn â'r sefyllfa gyfreithiol yma yng Nghymru, ac a oes gan y Llywodraeth fwriad i fynd i'r afael â'r broblem yna?
English: Well, the Abortion Act 1967 gave powers to Ministers in Scotland to use those powers, and to Ministers here in Wales, to be able to list categories of locations as places where it is possible to allow the second phase of an abortion to take place. What has happened in Scotland, which gives context to the discussion here in Wales, is that the Ministers took that decision last October and provided medical guidelines for the health service in Scotland in that context. But, as I just mentioned, a legal challenge has been set following that. That challenge is not in the public domain yet, I don't think, but it is relevant to the legal analysis in Scotland, as it is also here in Wales. So, it is important for us to keep that under review before we can be certain of the legal position that is relevant here too. But the subject is obviously extremely important and is one that we should actually look at through the current lens, as the Member mentioned in his question.
Welsh: Wel, yn Neddf Erthylu 1967, mae'r Ddeddf honno'n rhoi pwerau i Weinidogion yn yr Alban i ddefnyddio'r pwerau hynny, ac i'r Gweinidogion yma yng Nghymru, i allu penodi categorïau o leoliadau fel llefydd sydd yn bosibl i'r ail gam erthyliad yma i gymryd lle. Yr hyn sydd wedi digwydd yn yr Alban, sydd yn gyd-destun i'r drafodaeth yma yng Nghymru, yw bod Gweinidogion wedi gwneud y penderfyniad yna fis Hydref diwethaf, ac wedi darparu canllawiau meddygol i'r gwasanaeth iechyd yn yr Alban yn y cyd-destun hwnnw. Ond, fel y gwnes i grybwyll, mae sialens gyfreithiol wedi dod yn sgil hynny. Nid yw'r sialens, nid wyf yn credu, yn gyhoeddus eto, ond mae e'n sialens sydd yn berthnasol i'r dadansoddiad cyfreithiol yn yr Alban fel mae e hefyd yma yng Nghymru, ac felly, mae'n bwysig inni gadw llygad ar ddatblygiad hynny cyn gallu bod yn sicr o'r sefyllfa gyfreithiol sydd yn berthnasol yma hefyd. Ond mae'r testun yn amlwg yn un pwysig iawn, ac mae'r testun yn amlwg yn un y dylem ni edrych arno drwy lens y presennol, fel mae'r Aelod yn crybwyll yn ei gwestiwn.
English: What you've just told us about the challenge to the Scottish decision is very interesting. It's difficult to understand in the context of what we're asking women to do is to take this pill and then go home on the bus and have the miscarriage on the bus, and I can't see how this in their best interests, or indeed prudent healthcare. So, I'd be very interested to know what action you think the Welsh Government might take in the light of this challenge, whether you're going to wait for this challenge to run its course, which could be many months, or whether you might be prepared to bite the bullet on what, as far as I understand it, is perfectly within the health Secretary or the Government's domain to extend the place where medical abortions can be carried out.
Welsh: Mae'r hyn a ddywedoch wrthym ynglŷn â'r her i benderfyniad yr Alban yn ddiddorol iawn. Mae'n anodd deall hynny yn y cyd-destun mai'r hyn rydym yn gofyn i fenywod ei wneud yw cymryd y bilsen hon a wedyn mynd adref ar y bws a chael y camesgoriad ar y bws, ac ni allaf weld sut y gellir dweud mai hyn sydd orau i'w lles, neu'n wir, ei fod yn ofal iechyd darbodus. Felly, hoffwn wybod pa gamau y credwch y gallai Llywodraeth Cymru eu cymryd yng ngoleuni'r her hon, pa un a ydych yn mynd i aros hyd nes bod yr her wedi dod i ben, a allai gymryd sawl mis, neu a ydych yn barod i fynd amdani mewn perthynas â rhywbeth sydd, yn ôl yr hyn a ddeallaf, yn rhan o faes yr Ysgrifennydd iechyd neu'r Llywodraeth o ran ymestyn y mannau lle y gellir cyflawni erthyliadau meddygol.
English: Well, the issue that the Member identified is of course a critical issue about the safety of women and the supportive environment in which what is a medical process continues to the end of the process, if you like. And, so, that is obviously the live issue at the heart of this question. As I say, the legal framework is the same for Ministers in Wales as it is in Scotland. I think it's right that we should have regard to what the challenge contains, so that we understand what the potential outcomes are, but certainly, from the perspective of encouraging women to be safe when they are undertaking this procedure, clearly the concerns that the Member raises are absolutely paramount in that context.
Welsh: Wel, mae'r mater a nodwyd gan yr Aelod yn fater hollbwysig wrth gwrs sy'n ymwneud â diogelwch menywod a'r amgylchedd cefnogol lle mae proses feddygol yn parhau hyd at ddiwedd y broses, os hoffwch. Ac felly, mae'n amlwg mai dyna'r mater perthnasol sydd wrth wraidd y cwestiwn hwn. Fel y dywedaf, mae'r fframwaith cyfreithiol yr un fath ar gyfer Gweinidogion yng Nghymru â'r hyn ydyw yn yr Alban. Credaf ei bod yn iawn i ni roi sylw i'r hyn y mae'r her yn ei gynnwys, fel y gallwn ddeall beth yw'r canlyniadau posibl, ond yn sicr, o ran annog menywod i fod yn ddiogel pan fyddant yn cael y driniaeth hon, mae'n amlwg fod y pryderon a godwyd gan yr Aelod yn hollbwysig yn y cyd-destun hwnnw.
English: We listened to the debate on the petition that was held last week, and there were almost 6,500 signatories to that petition. Welsh Government is committed to exploring opportunities to bring forward legislation to ban the use of wild animals in circuses in Wales.
Welsh: Rydym ni wedi clywed y ddadl ar y ddeiseb a gynhaliwyd yn y diwrnodau diwethaf, a arwyddwyd gan bron i 6,500 o aelodau'r cyhoedd. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn archwilio'r cyfleoedd i gyflwyno deddfwriaeth i wahardd defnyddio anifeiliaid gwyllt mewn syrcasau yng Nghymru.
English: Thank you for that response, which doesn't really help in assisting us to understand what the Welsh Government intends to do. Clearly, this section could be used, as it gives Ministers very broad powers to intervene in cases of animal welfare. It is clear too that we could use primary legislation in this place - a Bill and an Act going through this place. Now, in the past, you as counsel general and your predecessor counsels general have generally favoured Bills, because they do give an opportunity to provide some context and to tidy up some other aspects of the law too. But, it's clear that the Assembly wishes to see urgent action in this area. Plaid Cymru is of the view that it would be appropriate to use section 12 of the Animal Welfare Act 2006, and I would want to know where Government thinking is now on using this section because there is so much other legislation in the pipeline emerging from Brexit and other issues. Isn't now the time for you to give the appropriate legal advice to enable Lesley Griffiths to proceed on this issue?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb yna, sydd ddim yn ein symud ni ymlaen i ddeall beth mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn bwriadu ei wneud. Mae'n amlwg bod modd defnyddio'r adran yma, sydd yn rhoi pwerau eang iawn i Weinidogion, a dweud y gwir, i ymyrryd dros les anifeiliaid. Ac mae'n amlwg hefyd bod modd i ddefnyddio deddfwriaeth sylfaenol yn y lle yma - Bil a Mesur yn mynd drwyddo. Yn y gorffennol, rydych chi fel cwnsler, a chwnsleriaid blaenorol, wedi ffafrio ar y cyfan Biliau, achos maen nhw'n rhoi cyfle i roi cyd-destun, ac efallai i dacluso agweddau eraill o'r gyfraith hefyd. Ond mae'n amlwg bod y Cynulliad yn meddwl ac yn dymuno gweld gweithredu buan iawn yn yr adran yma. Mae Plaid Cymru o'r farn ei bod hi'n briodol defnyddio adran 12 o Ddeddf Lles Anifeiliaid 2006 ac rwyf am weld lle mae meddwl y Llywodraeth bellach ynglŷn â defnyddio hon, gan fod cymaint o ddeddfwriaeth arall ar y gweill, yn deillio o Brexit a phethau eraill. Onid nawr yw'r amser i chi roi'r cyngor cyfreithiol priodol i alluogi Lesley Griffiths i fwrw ymlaen â'r mater yma?
English: Well, with section 12 of the 2006 Act, what is important is that strong evidence supports the argument for animal welfare. The UK Government has been clear that there isn't a sufficiently robust basis for that, and more than one report has demonstrated that. The Welsh Government commissioned a report that demonstrated that there was evidence to support that to some extent, but the risk within the welfare analysis is that it won't be adequate to withstand any legal challenge in the courts. There has been discussion, as the Cabinet Secretary alluded to in a recent debate. There has been discussion with the UK Government on a joint Bill, so that we could actually tackle that challenge that jointly, but that will take time. Consideration has been given to a specific Act to deal with this, and the powers that will come to us under the new settlement are broader, of course, and won't restrict us just to looking at animal welfare specifically. I listened to the comments of both the Members and the Cabinet Secretary in that debate, and I cannot discuss legal advice here, but I understand the strength of people's standpoints in this context.
Welsh: Wel, gydag adran 12 o Ddeddf 2006, yr hyn sy'n bwysig yw bod tystiolaeth gref yn cefnogi'r ddadl dros lesiant yr anifeiliaid. Mae safbwynt Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig wedi bod yn glir nad oes safbwynt digon cryf i hynny, ac mae mwy nag un adroddiad wedi dangos hynny. Wrth gwrs, gwnaeth Llywodraeth Cymru gomisiynu adroddiad wnaeth ddangos bod tystiolaeth yn cefnogi hynny i raddau, ond y risg o fewn y dadansoddiad llesiant yw nad yw hynny'n ddigon i allu gwrthsefyll unrhyw ymosodiad cyfreithiol yn y llysoedd. Mae trafodaeth wedi bod, fel y gwnaeth Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet grybwyll yn y ddadl yn ddiweddar. Bu trafodaethau gyda Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig ynglŷn â Bil ar y cyd, i sicrhau bod y ddeddfwriaeth honno yn gallu taclo'r sialens yma, ond bod hynny wedi cymryd amser. Mae trafodaethau neu ystyriaeth wedi bod i Ddeddf benodol i ddelio â hyn, ac mae'r pwerau a ddaw i ni dan y setliad newydd yn ehangach, wrth gwrs, a ddim yn ein cyfuno ni i edrych ar lesiant yn benodol. Gwnes i wrando ar sylwadau yr Aelodau a sylwadau Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn y ddadl, ac ni allaf drafod cyngor cyfreithiol fan hyn, ond rwyf yn deall cryfder safbwyntiau pobl yn y cyd-destun hwnnw.
English: Can we just be clear, does section 12 give you the ability to ban wild animals in circuses or not?
Welsh: A gawn ni fod yn glir, a yw adran 12 yn eich galluogi i wahardd anifeiliaid gwyllt mewn syrcasau ai peidio?