English: I was disappointed that this came after rather than before the press statement earlier, but nonetheless I would like to welcome this statement from the education Secretary, and that we are going to see at least some reopening of schools. Unlike Siân Gwenllian, I would have preferred it to be earlier rather than later but it's happening and I welcome that, and I'd like to thank the education Secretary for her work to bring that about. You were very frank, I felt, in your remarks earlier that it was the unions that prevented what sounded like your preferred sort of option of opening schools in early to mid August. Could I also clarify whether the unions were also influential in the decision of when to give back this additional week to be worked late in July? Wouldn't it have been better perhaps for parents and pupils if that week had been over the coming few weeks when only online opportunities were available, rather than being an additional week that will be missed now in the autumn term? I wouldn't like, though, for that question to be interpreted as anti-union or at all criticising the Minister for the engagement she has had with the unions. Clearly, if the unions are able to bring their members with them, it is pragmatic and sensible to work with them to try to get more teachers back to work and to come back in a more positive, participative and supportive way. That's to be welcomed. Can I, though, also ask: has she considered the interests of parents and pupils within that as well, because they're also clearly very important stakeholders within this? Overall, I think what she says about bringing all the children back at least for some education strikes me as having merits. She mentioned the equality aspect of that, but the supporting online learning and meeting physically as well, clearly, that will have benefits: checking on children, knowing where children are, being able to signpost and intervene where appropriate, and to support that online learning with some physical contact for all does seem positive. Can I just finally clarify the situation in terms of roughly a third of pupils returning was what the written statement said? I think you said just now that it was no more than a third of pupils. Similarly, the reference to their capacity, their own individual capacity for schools, and I think in a written statement: schools may need time to reach this level of operation. I think that was then changed to: schools may not be able to reach that level of operation. Clearly, it's for the Minister to update written statements and give the verbal version, which is, of course, the record and I appreciate it, but I just wonder, though, does that suggest that that area is one of some controversy? Did she have questions at her statement earlier that led to any change of mind or emphasis on that? And she mentioned more the schools that might find it difficult to get up that level operation, are there other schools where they may feel that they can operate safely with rather more pupils than a third, and will she give schools discretion on that side of the equation as well as the other? Thank you very much.
Welsh: Roeddwn yn siomedig fod hwn wedi dod ar ôl yn hytrach na chyn y datganiad i'r wasg yn gynharach, ond serch hynny, hoffwn groesawu'r datganiad hwn gan yr Ysgrifennydd Addysg, a'n bod yn mynd i weld o leiaf rhywfaint o ailagor ysgolion. Yn wahanol i Siân Gwenllian, byddai'n well gennyf i petai hynny'n gynharach yn hytrach nag yn hwyrach ond mae'n digwydd ac rwy'n croesawu hynny, a hoffwn ddiolch i'r Ysgrifennydd Addysg am ei gwaith i sicrhau hynny. Roeddech yn onest iawn, fe deimlais, yn eich sylwadau'n gynharach, pan ddywedsoch chi mai'r undebau a rwystrodd yr hyn a oedd yn swnio fel eich dewis cyntaf, sef agor ysgolion yng nghanol mis Awst. A gaf i hefyd fod yn glir a oedd yr undebau hefyd yn ddylanwadol wrth benderfynu pryd y dylid rhoi'r wythnos ychwanegol hon sydd i'w gweithio'n hwyr yng Ngorffennaf yn ôl? Oni fyddai wedi bod yn well efallai i rieni a disgyblion pe bai'r wythnos honno wedi bod yn ystod yr wythnosau nesaf pan nad oedd ond cyfleoedd ar-lein ar gael, yn hytrach na'i bod yn wythnos ychwanegol a gaiff ei cholli nawr yn nhymor yr Hydref? Ni fyddwn yn hoffi, fodd bynnag, i'r cwestiwn hwnnw gael ei ddehongli fel un yn erbyn yr undebau nac fel beirniadaeth o'r Gweinidog am ymgysylltu â'r undebau. Yn amlwg, os yw'r undebau'n gallu cael cefnogaeth eu haelodau, mae'n bragmatig ac yn synhwyrol gweithio gyda nhw i geisio cael mwy o athrawon yn ôl i'r gwaith ac i ddychwelyd mewn ffordd fwy cadarnhaol, cyfranogol a chefnogol. Mae hynny i'w groesawu. Fodd bynnag, a gaf i hefyd ofyn: a yw hi wedi ystyried buddiannau rhieni a disgyblion hefyd, oherwydd maen nhw hefyd yn amlwg yn rhanddeiliaid pwysig iawn yn hyn i gyd? Yn gyffredinol, credaf fod yr hyn y mae'n ei ddweud am ddod â'r holl blant yn ôl o leiaf i gael rhywfaint o addysg yn fy nharo fel cynllun sydd â rhinweddau. Soniodd am yr agwedd o gydraddoldeb yn hynny, ond o ran cefnogi dysgu ar-lein a chyfarfod yn gorfforol hefyd, yn amlwg bydd manteision i hynny: cadw llygad ar blant, gwybod lle mae plant, gallu cyfeirio ac ymyrryd pan fo'n briodol, ac mae cefnogi dysgu ar-lein gyda pheth cyswllt corfforol i bawb yn ymddangos yn gadarnhaol. Yn olaf a gaf i gadarnhau'r hyn y mae'r datganiad ysgrifenedig yn ei ddweud sef bod tua thraean o'r disgyblion yn dychwelyd? Credaf ichi ddweud nawr nad oedd yn fwy na thraean o'r disgyblion. Yn yr un modd, mae cyfeiriad at eu capasiti, eu capasiti unigol eu hunain ar gyfer ysgolion, a chredaf mewn datganiad ysgrifenedig: efallai y bydd angen amser ar ysgolion i allu gweithredu yn y modd hwn. Rwy'n credu i hynny gael ei newid wedyn i: efallai na fydd ysgolion yn gallu gweithredu yn y modd hwnnw. Yn amlwg, mater i'r Gweinidog yw diweddaru datganiadau ysgrifenedig a rhoi'r fersiwn lafar, sef y cofnod, wrth gwrs, ac rwy'n gwerthfawrogi hynny, ond tybed, serch hynny, a yw hynny'n awgrymu bod y pwnc hwnnw'n un dadleuol? A gwestiynwyd ei datganiad yn gynharach a arweiniodd at unrhyw newid meddwl neu bwyslais ar hynny? A soniodd am fwy o ysgolion a allai ei chael hi'n anodd gweithredu yn y modd hwnnw, a oes ysgolion eraill sy'n teimlo y gallant weithredu'n ddiogel gyda mwy o ddisgyblion na thraean, ac a wnaiff hi roi rhyddid i ysgolion ar ddwy ochr yr hafaliad i arfer eu doethineb? Diolch yn fawr iawn.