techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, thank you for giving me a timeline, which is useful. Although I accept the point you just made, could I also point out that this is an issue that touches on the sometimes excessive pay of senior council officials on many councils in Wales - many of which are Labour controlled? Can I bring to your attention the fact that two councillors in Torfaen have resigned from the Labour group because they were highlighting possible cuts that could be made - they said - to the excessive amount that they were alleging Torfaen council was spending on corporate management. Torfaen is spending almost £3 million a year on corporate management, which is almost double what is being spent on the same thing in neighbouring Newport. Minister, is there a case that, with council services under threat from austerity, as you keep telling us, your Welsh Government should now be investigating whether councils in Wales are spending excessive amounts on the top tier of officer pay?
Welsh: Wel, diolch am roi amserlen i mi, sy'n ddefnyddiol. Er fy mod yn derbyn y pwynt rydych newydd ei wneud, a gaf fi nodi hefyd fod hwn yn fater sy'n cyffwrdd â chyflog gormodol weithiau i uwch-swyddogion mewn sawl cyngor yng Nghymru - a llawer ohonynt yn gynghorau Lafur? A gaf fi dynnu eich sylw at y ffaith bod dau gynghorydd yn Nhorfaen wedi ymddiswyddo o'r grŵp Llafur am eu bod yn tynnu sylw at y toriadau posibl y gellid eu gwneud - yn ôl yr hyn a ddywedasant - i'r swm gormodol roeddent yn honni bod cyngor Torfaen yn ei wario ar reoli corfforaethol. Mae Torfaen yn gwario bron i £3 miliwn y flwyddyn ar reoli corfforaethol, sydd bron ddwywaith cymaint â'r hyn a werir ar yr un peth yng nghyngor cyfagos Casnewydd. Weinidog, gyda gwasanaethau cynghorau dan fygythiad oherwydd cyni fel y dywedwch wrthym o hyd, a oes achos i'w wneud dros ymchwiliad gan Lywodraeth Cymru i weld a yw cynghorau yng Nghymru yn gwario gormod o arian ar gyflogau swyddogion ar yr haen uchaf?
English: The Workforce Partnership Council has addressed this issue in the round for local authorities and the First Minister gave an undertaking that, once the processes in Caerphilly have finished, we will undertake a review of disciplinary action for the top tiers of local authority officers. I don't think it's at all right to compare two local authorities in the way that you have, because a large number of other issues will have come to bear in how a local authority structures its corporate core: what services it delivers and why something may or may not cost more than at another local authority. The truth is that most local authorities are really struggling with austerity. They've had their budgets either flatlined or cut for the last nine years. We know that all local authorities are really struggling to deliver much-valued and welcome local services and most of them are doing a fine job in making very bad decisions in the sense that there are no good decisions when you're cutting services that people rely on.
Welsh: Mae Cyngor Partneriaeth y Gweithlu wedi mynd i'r afael â'r mater hwn yn ei gyfanrwydd ar ran awdurdodau lleol a chafwyd ymrwymiad gan y Prif Weinidog, pan fydd y prosesau yng Nghaerffili wedi dod i ben, y byddwn yn cynnal adolygiad o gamau disgyblu ar gyfer haenau uchaf swyddogion awdurdodau lleol. Ni chredaf ei bod yn iawn cymharu dau awdurdod lleol fel y gwnaethoch, gan y bydd nifer fawr o faterion eraill yn effeithio ar sut y mae awdurdod lleol yn strwythuro ei graidd corfforaethol: pa wasanaethau y mae'n eu darparu a pham y gall rhywbeth gostio mwy nag mewn awdurdod lleol arall. Y gwir yw bod y rhan fwyaf o awdurdodau lleol yn ei chael hi'n wirioneddol anodd oherwydd cyni. Mae eu cyllidebau naill ai wedi aros yn llonydd neu wedi eu torri am y naw mlynedd ddiwethaf. Gwyddom fod pob awdurdod lleol yn ei chael hi'n anodd iawn darparu gwasanaethau lleol gwerthfawr, ac mae'r rhan fwyaf ohonynt yn gwneud gwaith da o ddewisiadau gwael iawn, yn yr ystyr nad oes unrhyw ddewisiadau da pan fyddwch yn torri gwasanaethau y mae pobl yn dibynnu arnynt.
English: [ Inaudible. ] - the economic reality of austerity, which you described in the first part of your answer, but it may be true that excessive pay at the top of an organisation may mean that people at the lower levels are not being paid enough. And we do know, from an investigation carried out in 2017 by BBC Wales, that most councils in Wales are paying some of their staff less than the real living wage. Do you not think, Minister, that it is time that you looked at the top-tier pay of local authorities in Wales to see if we can get these councils to pay less to their fat cats and more to the workers at the bottom of their pay scales?
Welsh: [ Anghlywadwy.] - realiti economaidd cyni, a ddisgrifiwyd gennych yn rhan gyntaf eich ateb, ond gall fod yn wir y gall tâl gormodol ar ben uchaf sefydliad olygu nad yw pobl ar y lefelau is yn cael digon o dâl. A gwyddom, o ymchwiliad a gynhaliwyd gan BBC Wales yn 2017, fod y rhan fwyaf o gynghorau yng Nghymru yn talu cyflog sy'n llai na'r cyflog byw go iawn i rai o'u staff. Onid ydych yn credu, Weinidog, ei bod yn bryd ichi edrych ar gyflogau haen uchaf awdurdodau lleol yng Nghymru i weld a allwn sicrhau bod y cynghorau hyn yn talu llai i'w gweithwyr blonegog a mwy i'r gweithwyr ar waelod eu graddfeydd cyflog?
English: As the First Minister said in answer to the question - and I agree with him entirely - I agree that there should be a multiplier. It's usually 20 between the lowest paid and the highest paid in any organisation. The workforce partnership council, which the Deputy Minister is going to be chairing later on this year, in its new reconfigured form, will be taking account of the pay and conditions of staff right across the public sector, and no doubt the workforce partnership council will have something to say about the multipliers that should be in effect.
Welsh: Fel y dywedodd y Prif Weinidog wrth ateb y cwestiwn - a chytunaf yn llwyr - rwy'n cytuno y dylid cael lluosydd. Fel arfer, mae'r ffigur yn 20 rhwng y cyflogau isaf a'r cyflogau uchaf mewn unrhyw sefydliad. Bydd cyngor partneriaeth y gweithlu, a fydd yn cael ei gadeirio ar ei newydd wedd yn ddiweddarach eleni gan y Dirprwy Weinidog, yn ystyried cyflogau ac amodau staff ar draws y sector cyhoeddus, ac nid oes amheuaeth y bydd gan gyngor partneriaeth y gweithlu rywbeth i'w ddweud am y lluosyddion a ddylai fod ar waith.
English: We're very much in favour of looking to see whether we can make security of tenure much more of a reality here in Wales, and we will be working hard with the sector to see whether we can repeal or modify section 21, as it's called, of the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 in order to give people better security of tenure.
Welsh: Rydym o blaid archwilio i weld a a allwn sicrhau bod sicrwydd deiliadaeth yn fwy o realiti o lawer yma yng Nghymru, a byddwn yn gweithio'n galed gyda'r sector i weld a allwn ddiddymu neu addasu adran 21, fel y'i gelwir, o Ddeddf Rhentu Cartrefi (Cymru) 2016 er mwyn rhoi gwell sicrwydd deiliadaeth i bobl.
English: Thank you. Minister, obviously this affects nearly 0.5 million people. Obviously, quite a lot of them are young, single people who don't seem to have a problem moving around at short notice, but the people who are really affected by this lack of any secure tenancy are people with families, which means that if they have a child in school - being evicted for no reason whatsoever; they could be model tenants - means that the child has to move school, in all likelihood. And equally, vulnerable people who require support from within the community to avoid social isolation are in a similar position. So, if and when we are in a position to actually make the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 go live, how is the section 173 replacing section 21 actually going to make any real difference to that security that people should be able to feel in privately rented homes? Because whilst it's possible for them to simply argue in the courts that they're being evicted because the landlord doesn't want to repair or otherwise make safe the dwelling that they're renting, that is not sufficient in itself. It opens it to racism and all sorts of other prejudice that could result from this very weak landlord-tenant relationship.
Welsh: Diolch. Weinidog, yn amlwg, mae hyn yn effeithio ar bron i 0.5 miliwn o bobl. Yn amlwg, mae llawer ohonynt yn bobl ifanc, sengl nad yw'n ymddangos bod symud o gwmpas ar fyr rybudd yn broblem iddynt, ond y bobl yr effeithir arnynt yn fawr gan ddiffyg sicrwydd deiliadaeth yw pobl â theuluoedd, sy'n golygu, os oes plentyn ganddynt yn yr ysgol - cael eu troi allan am ddim rheswm o gwbl; gallent fod yn denantiaid gwych - mae hyn yn golygu bod yn rhaid i'r plentyn newid ysgol, yn ôl pob tebyg. Ac yn yr un modd, mae pobl agored i niwed sydd angen cymorth yn y gymuned i osgoi ynysu cymdeithasol mewn sefyllfa debyg. Felly, os a phan fyddwn mewn sefyllfa i roi Deddf Rhentu Cartrefi (Cymru) 2016 ar waith, sut y bydd y ffaith bod adran 173 yn disodli adran 21 yn gwneud gwahaniaeth go iawn i'r sicrwydd y dylai pobl allu ei deimlo mewn cartrefi rhent preifat? Oherwydd, er ei bod yn bosibl iddynt ddadlau yn y llysoedd eu bod yn cael eu troi allan am nad yw'r landlord am drwsio'r annedd y maent yn ei rentu, neu ei wneud yn ddiogel, nid yw hynny'n ddigon ynddo'i hun. Mae'n ei wneud yn agored i hiliaeth a phob math o ragfarn arall a allai ddeillio o'r berthynas wan iawn hon rhwng landlord a thenant.
English: Thank you, Madam Presiding Officer. Minister, the leader of Caerphilly council said recently -
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Weinidog, yn ddiweddar, dywedodd arweinydd cyngor Caerffili -
English: My mistake, sorry; that's my mistake. David Melding was meant to be called on that question. You were too keen, Mohammad, and I was wrong. David Melding.
Welsh: Fy nghamgymeriad i, mae'n ddrwg gennyf; fy nghamgymeriad i. David Melding a ddylai fod wedi'i alw ar gyfer y cwestiwn hwnnw. Roeddech yn rhy awyddus, Mohammad, ac roeddwn innau'n anghywir. David Melding.
English: I am grateful to you, Presiding Officer. In England, they're looking at this as well, and you know that there's a proposal to increase the minimum tenancy period from six months to three years. However, the 1988 reform was designed to bring more properties onto the market, because at that stage there was, one could argue, quite severe over-regulation and the supply of properties to rent was very much affected. So, we need to look at this carefully, but I think the default position shouldn't be at something like six months. I think that's where we've got a problem, and it should be set higher. We need to consult widely with the sector. And, for some people, having a short tenancy is what they want, but that's a bit crowded now and we need more variety in the market, but there will have to be assurances on both sides when we look at longer tenancies, because they bring some risk, obviously, for very reputable landlords, as well.
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Yn Lloegr, maent yn ystyried hyn hefyd, a gwyddoch fod cynnig i gynyddu isafswm y cyfnod tenantiaeth o chwe mis i dair blynedd. Fodd bynnag, lluniwyd diwygiad 1988 er mwyn rhoi mwy o eiddo ar y farchnad, oherwydd ar y pryd, gellid dadlau bod gor-reoleiddio wedi cael cryn effaith ar y cyflenwad o eiddo rhent. Felly, mae angen inni ystyried hyn yn ofalus, ond ni chredaf y dylai'r cyfnod rhagosodedig fod yn chwe mis. Credaf mai dyna lle mae gennym broblem, ac y dylid ei osod yn uwch. Mae angen i ni ymgynghori'n eang â'r sector. Ac mae rhai pobl yn dymuno cael tenantiaeth fer, ond mae llawer o hynny bellach ac mae angen mwy o amrywiaeth arnom yn y farchnad, ond bydd yn rhaid cael sicrwydd ar y ddwy ochr wrth ystyried tenantiaethau hirach, gan eu bod yn peri rhywfaint o risg, yn amlwg, i landlordiaid da iawn, hefyd.
English: Certainly. the Welsh Government is committed to protecting local government and the services they provide. Local government in all areas of Wales have received the best possible settlement, with the 1 per cent reduction announced at the 2018-19 final budget turning into a 0.2 per cent increase this year.
Welsh: Yn sicr. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ymrwymo i ddiogelu llywodraeth leol a'r gwasanaethau y maent yn eu darparu. Mae llywodraeth leol ym mhob rhan o Gymru wedi cael y setliad gorau posibl, gyda'r gostyngiad o 1 y cant a gyhoeddwyd yng nghyllideb derfynol 2018-19 wedi troi'n gynnydd o 0.2 y cant eleni.
English: Minister, due to Tory austerity, Torfaen council has had no option but to increase council tax this year in order to protect vital services, namely social care and education. I'm very proud that, in Torfaen, we have a Labour council that is prepared to take those decisions to protect our local services. The leader of UKIP knows nothing about the financial pressures facing the local authority in Torfaen, and I'm sure that you would agree with me, Minister, that all the low-hanging fruit is now gone in local authorities and they are facing a genuine struggle to survive. Last week, the leader of Torfaen told the Children, Young People and Education Committee that he had protected education as he believes that it is a key preventative service. I very much agree with that view. Do you agree with that view, Minister? And, given the very hard-hitting evidence that the committee has received about the funding pressures in schools, what steps will you take to ensure that education is prioritised in the next budget round?
Welsh: Weinidog, yn sgil cyni'r Torïaid, nid oedd dewis gan gyngor Torfaen ond cynyddu'r dreth gyngor eleni er mwyn diogelu gwasanaethau hanfodol, sef gofal cymdeithasol ac addysg. Rwy'n falch iawn fod gennym, yn Nhorfaen, gyngor Llafur sy'n barod i wneud y penderfyniadau hynny i ddiogelu ein gwasanaethau lleol. Nid yw arweinydd UKIP yn gwybod dim am y pwysau ariannol sy'n wynebu'r awdurdod lleol yn Nhorfaen, ac rwy'n siŵr y byddech yn cytuno â mi, Weinidog, fod yr holl ffrwythau isel wedi diflannu bellach mewn awdurdodau lleol a'u bod yn wynebu brwydr wirioneddol i oroesi. Yr wythnos diwethaf, dywedodd arweinydd Torfaen wrth y Pwyllgor Plant, Pobl Ifanc ac Addysg ei fod wedi diogelu addysg gan ei fod yn credu ei fod yn wasanaeth ataliol allweddol. Cytunaf yn gryf â'r farn honno. A ydych yn cytuno â'r farn honno, Weinidog? Ac o ystyried y dystiolaeth gadarn iawn a gafodd y pwyllgor ynghylch pwysau ariannol mewn ysgolion, pa gamau y byddwch yn eu cymryd i sicrhau bod addysg yn cael ei blaenoriaethu yn y cylch cyllidebol nesaf?
English: Yes. I absolutely welcome the prioritisation that Torfaen and, indeed, many other authorities are giving to education and social services in what is indeed a very difficult settlement for most local authorities. We recognise the challenges for authorities and the difficult choices they're making, as I said earlier, on the savings and changing services, and the decisions they're having to make on council tax in order to balance the budget. As I said, in between the indicative settlement and the actual settlement, we managed to increase the funding for local government to reflect some of the specific priorities that they have stressed to us around education and social services. We certainly do welcome that priority. But there is no doubt that austerity is biting deep into local services, and very difficult choices have to be made across all councils.
Welsh: Ie. Rwy'n bendant yn croesawu'r flaenoriaeth y mae Torfaen, a llawer o awdurdodau eraill yn wir, yn ei rhoi i addysg a gwasanaethau cymdeithasol mewn setliad sy'n anodd iawn i'r rhan fwyaf o awdurdodau lleol. Rydym yn cydnabod yr heriau i awdurdodau a'r dewisiadau anodd a wnânt, fel y dywedais yn gynharach, ynghylch arbedion a gwasanaethau sy'n newid, a'r penderfyniadau y mae'n rhaid iddynt eu gwneud ynglŷn â'r dreth gyngor er mwyn cydbwyso'r gyllideb. Fel y dywedais, rhwng y setliad dangosol a'r setliad gwirioneddol, fe lwyddasom i gynyddu'r cyllid i lywodraeth leol er mwyn adlewyrchu rhai o'r blaenoriaethau penodol y maent wedi eu pwysleisio wrthym ynglŷn ag addysg a gwasanaethau cymdeithasol. Yn sicr, rydym yn croesawu'r flaenoriaeth honno. Ond nid oes amheuaeth fod cyni'n cael cryn effaith ar wasanaethau lleol, ac mae'n rhaid i'r holl gynghorau wneud dewisiadau anodd iawn.
English: Minister, the leader of Caerphilly council said recently that the authority was at the end of its tether after receiving a real-terms cut in its funding. As a result, residents of Caerphilly have seen their council tax bill increase by nearly 7 per cent, combined with a £14 million cut in council services. These cuts to services include Pontllanfraith leisure centre, which could close by the end of June this year, in spite of fierce opposition from the local community. That is the area where Neil Kinnock's [ Inaudible.] are still there. Does the Minister accept that her poor local government settlement will have a serious and detrimental effect on the Welsh Government's strategies for the health, education and well-being of people living in Caerphilly, please?
Welsh: Weinidog, dywedodd arweinydd cyngor Caerffili yn ddiweddar fod yr awdurdod ar ben ei dennyn ar ôl cael toriad i'w gyllid mewn termau real. O ganlyniad, mae trigolion Caerffili wedi gweld cynnydd o bron i 7 y cant yn eu biliau treth gyngor, ynghyd â thoriad o £14 miliwn i wasanaethau'r cyngor. Mae'r toriadau hyn i'r gwasanaethau yn cynnwys canolfan hamdden Pontllan-fraith, a allai gau erbyn diwedd mis Mehefin eleni, er gwaethaf gwrthwynebiad chwyrn gan y gymuned leol. Dyna'r ardal lle mae [ Anghlywadwy.] Neil Kinnock yn dal yno. A yw'r Gweinidog yn derbyn y bydd ei setliad llywodraeth leol gwael yn cael effaith ddifrifol ac andwyol ar strategaethau Llywodraeth Cymru ar gyfer iechyd, addysg a lles pobl sy'n byw yng Nghaerffili, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: Local authorities will receive £4.2 billion of general funding to spend on services in 2019-20, and core funding will increase by 0.2 per cent on a like-for-like basis compared to 2018-19. In line with our programme for government commitment to provide funding for a settlement floor, the settlement includes £3.5 million fully funded by the Welsh Government to ensure that no authority has to manage with a reduction of more than 0.3 per cent in its aggregate external finance next year. We have done the very best we can to put an umbrella over our local authorities and their services from the incredibly cruel austerity programme implemented by the Conservative Government that Mohammad Asghar supports and presumably voted for. The idea that you can separate out a decision to continue with an austerity programme for nine years from the destruction of local services in your local authority is quite extraordinary, and you really need to look to see what the unintended consequences of your own policies are on the services that you're talking about before you look anywhere else, because there is absolutely no doubt that, as Lynne Neagle just said, there is no low-hanging fruit here. We are cutting into the bone of services that local people, as he has rightly said, really, really value, and they don't want those services closed. The only way of stopping that happening is to reverse the very cruel austerity programme that your Government has been implementing.
Welsh: Bydd awdurdodau lleol yn derbyn £4.2 biliwn o gyllid cyffredinol i'w wario ar wasanaethau yn 2019-20, a bydd cyllid craidd yn cynyddu 0.2 y cant ar sail debyg am debyg o gymharu â 2018-19. Yn unol ag ymrwymiad ein rhaglen lywodraethu i ddarparu cyllid ar gyfer terfyn isaf i'r setliad, mae'r setliad yn cynnwys £3.5 miliwn a ariennir yn llawn gan Lywodraeth Cymru i sicrhau nad oes yn rhaid i unrhyw awdurdod ymdopi â gostyngiad o fwy na 0.3 y cant yn ei gyllid allanol cyfunol y flwyddyn nesaf. Rydym wedi gwneud ein gorau glas i ddal ymbarél dros ein hawdurdodau lleol a'u gwasanaethau rhag y rhaglen hynod greulon o gyni a weithredir gan y Llywodraeth Geidwadol y mae Mohammad Asghar yn ei chefnogi, ac y pleidleisiodd drosti yn ôl pob tebyg. Mae'r syniad y gallwch wahanu'r penderfyniad i barhau â rhaglen gyni am naw mlynedd oddi wrth y difrod i wasanaethau lleol yn eich awdurdod lleol yn eithaf rhyfeddol, ac mae angen i chi ystyried beth yw canlyniadau anfwriadol eich polisïau eich hun i'r gwasanaethau rydych yn sôn amdanynt cyn ichi edrych yn unrhyw le arall, gan nad oes unrhyw amheuaeth, fel y dywedodd Lynne Neagle yn awr, nad oes unrhyw ffrwythau isel ar ôl yma. Rydym yn torri hyd at yr asgwrn y gwasanaethau y mae pobl leol, fel y dywedodd yn gywir, yn eu gwir werthfawrogi, ac nid ydynt am i'r gwasanaethau hynny gau. Yr unig ffordd o atal hynny rhag digwydd yw gwrthdroi'r rhaglen greulon iawn o gyni y mae eich Llywodraeth wedi bod yn ei gweithredu.
English: We continue to give careful consideration, including seeking further legal clarification on aspects of the case, to how the environmental impact assessment within the planning system applies to the plant built by Biomass UK No. 2 Ltd. We will issue a decision as soon as possible.
Welsh: Rydym yn parhau i roi ystyriaeth ofalus, gan gynnwys gofyn am ragor o eglurhad cyfreithiol ar rai agweddau ar yr achos, o ran sut y mae'r asesiad o'r effaith amgylcheddol yn y system gynllunio yn berthnasol i'r ffatri a adeiladwyd gan Biomass UK No. 2 Ltd. Byddwn yn cyhoeddi penderfyniad cyn gynted â phosibl.
English: Regrettably, Minister, that will give me a clear indication - and those watching from Barry - that I will not get much insight into the situation the Government finds itself in at the moment, other than that it is still seeking legal advice, some 13 months after you yourself, in this Chamber, gave a commitment that you were minded to request an environmental impact assessment. Given that you will not go much further on offering a date for when you might be in a position to give that opinion, can you give us an understanding, then, of the legal advice that you are commissioning that is supporting your decision making? Is it outside legal expert advice that you are commissioning, or is it the internal legal expertise that you have within Welsh Government? Because, I am dumbfounded, like many people in Barry, as to why this process is still, 13 months on, unresolved.
Welsh: Yn anffodus, Weinidog, bydd hynny'n rhoi arwydd clir i mi - a'r rheini sy'n gwylio'r o'r Barri - na fyddaf yn cael llawer o wybodaeth am sefyllfa'r Llywodraeth ar hyn o bryd, heblaw ei bod yn dal i ceisio cyngor cyfreithiol, oddeutu 13 mis ar ôl i chi roi ymrwymiad yn y Siambr hon eich bod yn bwriadu gofyn am asesiad o'r effaith amgylcheddol. O ystyried nad ewch chi lawer pellach a chynnig dyddiad i ddynodi pryd y gallech fod mewn sefyllfa i roi'r farn honno, a allwch roi eglurhad inni, felly, o'r cyngor cyfreithiol rydych yn ei gomisiynu i gefnogi eich penderfyniadau? Ai cyngor cyfreithiol arbenigol allanol rydych yn ei gomisiynu, neu'r arbenigedd cyfreithiol mewnol sydd gennych yn Llywodraeth Cymru? Oherwydd nid oes syniad gennyf, fel llawer o bobl yn y Barri, pam fod y broses hon yn dal heb ei datrys, 13 mis yn ddiweddarach.
English: I thank the Member for his question on this issue. As he is aware, the case raises complex issues about how the EIA applies to applications to amend planning conditions, which are taking some time to work through. Details of any Welsh Government instruction for legal advice, including whether legal advice is sought or given in relation to any matter, is protected by legal professional privilege.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am ei gwestiwn ar y mater hwn. Fel y gŵyr, mae'r achos yn codi materion cymhleth ynglŷn â sut y mae'r asesiad o'r effaith amgylcheddol yn berthnasol i geisiadau i ddiwygio amodau cynllunio, ac mae'n cymryd peth amser i weithio drwy'r materion hynny. Caiff manylion unrhyw gyfarwyddyd gan Lywodraeth Cymru ynglŷn â chyngor cyfreithiol, gan gynnwys a roddir neu a ofynnir am gyngor cyfreithiol mewn perthynas ag unrhyw fater, eu diogelu gan fraint broffesiynol gyfreithiol.