English: I endorse what's just been said. I think five years has been too long a time for setting the standards, and there were disputes. I accept that the legislation is very, very carefully prepared and it gives people an opportunity to challenge those standards. So, that means that the process is quite lengthy. But, bearing in mind the complexity of the work that some of these organisations undertake, particularly local government, you're not going to get simple legislation, with just one line, that will succeed in doing the job. There is a risk, in oversimplification, that you can get very superficial legislation, which won't challenge anybody at all. Because the whole purpose of the legislation was to change the way in which people worked, bodies worked, and the way in which they viewed the Welsh language within their own structures. So, you couldn't expect the legislation to be a one-pager and off you go. I'm sure that it may be overcautious, as I say, but one of the reasons for that was that our partners in Government were quite concerned about the reaction of some of these organisations and wanted to give them an opportunity to come back if they felt that the standards were unreasonable and unfair. There we go; I think that's quite right. It does make the process a longer one, but I'm sure you can ask the commissioner whether they've learnt from that and whether that means the process is simplified by now. It will be very interesting to hear what the commissioner will have to say about standards in the health sector, for example, an exceptionally important sector to so many of us. If you think about children, people with mental health issues, dementia - language is at the core and at the heart of such care, and I would add those people facing potentially fatal diseases. You don't expect every specialist, consultant and surgeon to be a Welsh speaker, do you? No, but having people that you can contact - and I know this from personal experience - that can do that in your first language, whether that be Welsh or English and maybe in other languages too. Having people there that you can communicate with when you are in extremis, that is extremely important, not for the treatment, but for the patient when they go through the process. So, it'll be exceptionally interesting to hear what the commissioner will have to say about standards in the health service, and they're really needed immediately. Sorry, I've lost the thread of your question -
Welsh: Rydw i'n ategu hynny. Rydw i'n credu bod pum mlynedd wedi bod yn amser rhy hir i osod y safonau, ac mi fuodd yna ddadlau. Rydw i'n derbyn bod y ddeddfwriaeth yn ofalus iawn, iawn ac yn rhoi cyfle i bobl herio'r safonau. Felly, mae hynny'n golygu bod y broses yn un weddol o hir. Ond, o gofio cymhlethdod y gwaith y mae rhai o'r cyrff yma'n ei wneud, yn enwedig llywodraeth leol, nid ydych chi'n mynd i gael deddfwriaeth syml, efo rhyw un llinell, sydd yn mynd i lwyddo i wneud y gwaith. Mae yna beryg, wrth gwrs, wrth orsymleiddio, y gallwch chi wneud rhywbeth arwynebol iawn, iawn, sydd mewn gwirionedd ddim yn heriol o gwbl. Achos holl bwrpas y ddeddfwriaeth oedd newid y ffordd roedd pobl yn gweithio, y ffordd roedd cyrff yn gweithio, a'r ffordd roedden nhw'n edrych ar y Gymraeg o fewn eu strwythurau eu hunain. Felly, nid oedd disgwyl i'r ddeddfwriaeth fod yn un tudalen a ffwrdd â chi. Mae'n siŵr ei bod hi yn orofalus, fel rydw i'n dweud, ond un o'r rhesymau am hynny oedd bod ein partneriaid ni yn y Llywodraeth yn bur bryderus ynglŷn ag ymateb rhai o'r cyrff yma ac eisiau rhoi cyfle iddyn nhw ddod yn ôl felly os oedden nhw'n teimlo bod y safonau yn afresymol ac yn annheg. Dyna fo; rydw i'n meddwl bod hynny'n iawn. Mae o'n gwneud y broses yn hirach, ond rydw i'n siŵr - a chewch chi ofyn i'r comisiynydd a ydyn nhw wedi dysgu o hynny ac a ydy hynny felly yn golygu bod y broses yn fwy syml erbyn hyn - . Bydd yn ddiddorol iawn gweld beth fydd gan y comisiynydd i ddweud ynglŷn â'r safonau yn y sector iechyd, er enghraifft - sector eithriadol o bwysig i gymaint ohonom ni. Os ydych chi'n meddwl am blant, pobl ag afiechyd meddwl, dementia - mae iaith yn greiddiol i ofal o'r fath, ac mi fyddwn i'n ychwanegu pobl sydd yn wynebu clefydau sydd â'r potensial i fod yn angheuol. Nid ydych chi'n disgwyl i bob arbenigwr a phob consultant a phob llawfeddyg fod yn siarad Cymraeg, a ydych chi? Na, ond mae cael pobl rydych chi'n gallu cysylltu â nhw - ac rydw i'n gwybod hyn o brofiad personol - sydd yn medru ei wneud o yn eich mamiaith, pa un bynnag ydy honno, y Gymraeg neu Saesneg ac efallai ieithoedd eraill - . Mae cael pobl rydych chi'n gallu cyfathrebu â nhw yn eich pryder ac yn y blaen yn eithriadol o bwysig, nid i'r driniaeth, ond i'r claf pan fo'n mynd drwy'r broses. Felly, bydd hi'n ddiddorol iawn gweld beth sydd gan y comisiynydd i ddweud wrthych chi am osod safonau yn y gwasanaeth iechyd, ac mae dirfawr angen hynny rhag blaen. Rydw i wedi colli trac ar eich cwestiwn chi, rydw i'n meddwl -