English: Llywydd, let me assure the Member that the people of Wales do not need the sort of explanation that he is offering. The people in Wales are clamouring for us to take the action that would protect them from people travelling into Wales from high infection areas elsewhere, and nowhere is that more true than in the Member's own constituency, where people are anxious and fearful of the effects on their area of people from very high transmission areas elsewhere - not being able to travel there from Wales, but, absurdly, still being able to travel from England to those areas. So, he is entirely out of step with the views and the preferences of people in Wales. I was glad to publish that paper yesterday. It certainly does not implore me to do anything, and I'm more likely to rely on the advice of those who are experts in genomics, rather than amateur readers of their advice. If he wants two other bits of evidence - as I say, not that people in Wales need his evidence, because they are well convinced already - the evidence is, Llywydd, that up to 80 per cent of new infections are spread by superspreaders. So, it doesn't take many people to come in from an outside area who are a superspreader to have a very large effect. Secondly, using the novel techniques developed by specialists in Bangor University, we're now monitoring the waste water from points along the coast of north Wales and north-west England, and we're seeing significant loads of genomic copies of COVID-19 that show an increase in the likely prevalence of that virus in catchment areas. It demonstrates that visitors from beyond Wales bring the virus with them. That's what people are anxious to avoid, that's why we took action here in Wales. Wouldn't it be good if his party was willing to do the same?
Welsh: Lywydd, gadewch imi sicrhau'r Aelod nad yw pobl Cymru angen y math o esboniad y mae'n ei gynnig. Mae pobl Cymru'n galw'n groch am inni gymryd y camau a fyddai'n eu diogelu rhag pobl sy'n teithio i Gymru o ardaloedd eraill lle mae'r gyfradd achosion yn uchel, ac mae hynny'n arbennig o wir yn etholaeth yr Aelod ei hun, lle mae pobl yn bryderus ac yn ofni effeithiau pobl o ardaloedd eraill lle mae'r gyfradd drosglwyddo'n uchel iawn ar eu ardal hwy - ac er na chânt hwy deithio yno o Gymru, mae'n hurt eu bod yn dal i allu teithio o Loegr i'r ardaloedd hynny. Felly, nid yw'r Aelod yn adlewyrchu barn a dyheadau pobl Cymru. Roeddwn yn falch o gyhoeddi'r papur hwnnw ddoe. Yn sicr, nid yw'n pwyso arnaf i wneud dim, ac rwy'n fwy tebygol o ddibynnu ar gyngor y rhai sy'n arbenigwyr mewn genomeg, yn hytrach nag amaturiaid sy'n darllen eu cyngor. Os yw am gael dau ddarn arall o dystiolaeth - fel y dywedais, nid bod pobl Cymru angen ei dystiolaeth, oherwydd maent wedi'u hargyhoeddi'n barod - y dystiolaeth, Lywydd, yw bod hyd at 80 y cant o achosion newydd o'r haint yn cael eu hachosi gan archledaenwyr. Felly, nid yw'n cymryd llawer o bobl sy'n archledaenwyr i ddod i mewn o ardal allanol i gael effaith fawr iawn. Yn ail, gan ddefnyddio'r technegau newydd a ddatblygwyd gan arbenigwyr ym Mhrifysgol Bangor, rydym bellach yn monitro'r dŵr gwastraff o fannau ar hyd arfordir gogledd Cymru a gogledd-orllewin Lloegr, ac rydym yn gweld llwythi sylweddol o gopïau genomig o COVID-19 sy'n dangos cynnydd yn y nifer debygol o'r achosion o'r feirws mewn dalgylchoedd. Mae'n dangos bod ymwelwyr o'r tu hwnt i Gymru yn dod â'r feirws gyda hwy. Dyna beth y mae pobl yn awyddus i'w osgoi, dyna pam y gwnaethom weithredu yma yng Nghymru. Oni fyddai'n dda pe bai ei blaid yn fodlon gwneud yr un peth?