English: I thank the Member for that supplementary question. He's right to say, obviously, that there's strong cross-party support in this Assembly and across Wales for the lagoon, which is why it's so disappointing that the UK Government took the decision that it did. As he rightly suggests in his question, the involvement of the UK Government was partly driven by the need for a contract for difference, which obviously is not devolved to Wales, and we don't have competence in the Assembly to set up a comparable regime to the contract for difference regime. I'm aware, as he is, of the discussions that have been happening, and the press coverage in particular, of an alternative model, which might involve a mechanism other than a contract for difference method for delivery. Obviously, if that were the case, the powers of the Welsh Government would be different from a model where contract for difference is necessary. And subject to a large number of questions around resourcing, and broader questions, Welsh Ministers obviously do have broad, general executive powers to facilitate job creation and economic development, including by way of loans and guarantees and grants and so forth. In fact, those powers were actually the basis of the offer that the First Minister made to support the current proposal for the tidal lagoon. Those would need to be looked at in the context of a particular proposal if that comes forward, a concrete proposal, and obviously, again, in the context of state aid rules. Clearly, we'd need to either establish that there was no state aid or that the aid was compatible with the framework in the legislation. As I say, there isn't, at this point in time, a concrete proposal to evaluate, but he should rest assured that the Government will look at all its powers and consider them in that context if that proposal comes forward.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn atodol. Mae'n iawn i ddweud, yn amlwg, fod yna gefnogaeth drawsbleidiol gref yn y Cynulliad hwn ac ar draws Cymru i'r morlyn, a dyna pam ein bod mor siomedig fod Llywodraeth y DU wedi gwneud y penderfyniad a wnaeth. Fel y mae'n awgrymu'n briodol yn ei gwestiwn, roedd ymwneud Llywodraeth y DU wedi'i ysgogi'n rhannol gan yr angen am gontract gwahaniaeth, nad yw, yn amlwg, wedi'i ddatganoli i Gymru, ac nid oes gennym gymhwysedd yn y Cynulliad i sefydlu trefn debyg i gyfundrefn y contract gwahaniaeth. Rwy'n ymwybodol, fel yntau, o'r trafodaethau sydd wedi bod yn digwydd, a'r sylw yn y wasg yn benodol, ynglŷn â model amgen a allai gynnwys mecanwaith heblaw dull contract gwahaniaeth ar gyfer cyflawni. Yn amlwg, pe bai hynny'n wir, byddai pwerau Llywodraeth Cymru yn wahanol i fodel lle mae angen contract gwahaniaeth. Ac yn amodol ar nifer fawr o gwestiynau ynglŷn ag adnoddau, a chwestiynau ehangach, mae'n amlwg fod gan Weinidogion Cymru bwerau gweithredol eang a chyffredinol i hwyluso creu swyddi a datblygu economaidd, gan gynnwys drwy gyfrwng benthyciadau a gwarantau a grantiau ac ati. Yn wir, y pwerau hynny oedd sail y cynnig a wnaeth Prif Weinidog Cymru i gefnogi'r cynnig cyfredol ar gyfer y morlyn llanw. Byddai'n rhaid edrych ar y rheini yng nghyd-destun cynnig penodol pe bai'n cael ei gyflwyno, cynnig pendant, ac yn amlwg unwaith eto, yng nghyd-destun rheolau cymorth gwladwriaethol. Yn amlwg, byddai angen inni sefydlu nad oedd unrhyw gymorth gwladwriaethol neu fod y cymorth yn gydnaws â'r fframwaith yn y ddeddfwriaeth. Fel y dywedaf, nid oes cynnig pendant i'w werthuso ar hyn o bryd, ond dylai fod yn dawel ei feddwl y bydd y Llywodraeth yn edrych ar ei holl bwerau ac yn eu hystyried yn y cyd-destun hwnnw pe bai'r cynnig yn cael ei gyflwyno.