English: Thank you for that answer. I understood that the targeting was at areas of deprivation, but it seemed that, in the way that it's been crafted, it was able to have a slightly wider remit than, perhaps, the pupil deprivation grant. This £36 million, though - you'll have seen it in the press this week - has already prompted some questions about its value for money in terms of its outcomes. You've also heard that schools are worried that maintaining the levels of employment of all of these new staff, and actually populating the new rooms that this £36 million may have bought, may be pretty difficult when this class-size funding commitment comes to an end. Some of those schools that have used this money will also be eligible for a considerable amount of pupil development grant income, but, of course, not all of them. So, firstly, can you tell me whether you're expecting the extra PDG that you've announced for infant-age children just this week to pick up the cost of this activity from 2020-21, which would soak up any rise in that budget line? Secondly, what do you say to rural schools that may have made that investment in staff and buildings to reduce infant class sizes, but don't have access to high levels of PDG, which also supports the sustainability of schools in terms of staffing numbers, whose provision of SEN support, which goes back to my first question today, is doubly difficult due to sparsity and therefore, they can't tackle the effects of poverty in the way that they would like and, presumably, in the way that you would like? Some schools in my region really do quite well through the central education budget, but my rural schools do not. And I can only imagine what this looks like in your own overwhelmingly rural constituency.
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb hwnnw. Roeddwn yn deall bod yr arian yn cael ei dargedu at ardaloedd o amddifadedd, ond roedd yn ymddangos, yn y ffordd y cafodd ei lunio, y gallai o bosibl fod wedi mabwysiadu cwmpas ychydig yn ehangach na'r grant amddifadedd disgyblion. Mae'r £36 miliwn hwn, serch hynny - byddwch wedi'i weld yn y wasg yr wythnos hon - eisoes wedi ysgogi rhai cwestiynau am ei werth am arian o ran ei ganlyniadau. Rydych wedi clywed hefyd fod ysgolion yn poeni y gallai cynnal lefelau cyflogaeth yr holl aelodau staff newydd hyn, a phoblogi'r ystafelloedd newydd y gallai'r £36 miliwn fod wedi'u prynu, fod yn eithaf anodd pan ddaw'r ymrwymiad i gyllido maint dosbarthiadau i ben. Bydd rhai o'r ysgolion sydd wedi defnyddio'r arian hwn hefyd yn gymwys i gael cryn dipyn o incwm grant datblygu disgyblion, ond wrth gwrs, nid pob un ohonynt. Felly, yn gyntaf, a allwch chi ddweud wrthyf a ydych yn disgwyl i'r grant datblygu disgyblion ychwanegol a gyhoeddwyd gennych ar gyfer babanod yr wythnos hon dalu am gost y gweithgaredd hwn o 2020-21 ymlaen, gan amsugno unrhyw gynnydd yn y llinell wariant honno? Yn ail, beth rydych yn ei ddweud wrth ysgolion gwledig a allai fod wedi gwneud y buddsoddiad hwnnw mewn staff ac adeiladau i leihau maint dosbarthiadau babanod, ond nad oes ganddynt fynediad at lefelau uchel o grant datblygu disgyblion, sydd hefyd yn cefnogi cynaliadwyedd ysgolion o ran niferoedd staff, ysgolion y mae eu darpariaeth o gymorth AAA, sy'n mynd yn ôl at fy nghwestiwn cyntaf heddiw, ddwywaith mor anodd oherwydd teneurwydd y boblogaeth ac felly nid ydynt yn gallu mynd i'r afael ag effeithiau tlodi yn y ffordd y byddent yn hoffi ac yn ôl pob tebyg, yn y ffordd y byddech chi'n hoffi? Mae rhai ysgolion yn fy rhanbarth yn gwneud yn eithaf da drwy'r gyllideb addysg ganolog, ond nid fy ysgolion gwledig. Ni allaf ond dychmygu beth yw'r sefyllfa yn eich etholaeth hynod wledig chi.