techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: What I can say is to reiterate what the First Minister said, which is that, yes, we do wish to have those powers. It is an area that we wish to legislate in. What the precise content of that legislation might be, I'm sure the detail of that would still need to be considered. Equally so, we'd need to go through the floor of this Senedd. Can I also say, just in terms of the points you made about other Governments, of course there are concerns, just as there were concerns in Scotland? What was interesting about the legislation in Scotland was that it had cross-party support and it had cross-party opposition. There were those within the SNP who opposed it. There were those within the Scottish Labour Party that supported and opposed as well. I think it's in the nature of that particular legislation. But, the First Minister has been completely clear about the direction that we do want to go in. The detail of that is something I'm sure would be considered if and when we actually get legislative competence in that area.
Welsh: Yr hyn y gallaf ei ddweud yw ailadrodd yr hyn a ddywedodd y Prif Weinidog, sef ein bod yn dymuno cael y pwerau hynny. Mae'n faes rydym am ddeddfu ynddo. Rwy'n siŵr y byddai angen ystyried y manylion ynglŷn â beth fyddai union gynnwys y ddeddfwriaeth honno. Yn yr un modd, byddai angen inni fynd drwy'r Senedd hon. A gaf fi ddweud hefyd, ar y pwyntiau a wnaethoch am Lywodraethau eraill, wrth gwrs fod yna bryderon, yn union fel roedd pryderon yn yr Alban? Yr hyn a oedd yn ddiddorol am y ddeddfwriaeth yn yr Alban oedd bod iddi gefnogaeth drawsbleidiol ac roedd iddi wrthwynebiad trawsbleidiol. Roedd rhai o fewn yr SNP yn ei gwrthwynebu. Roedd yna rai o fewn Plaid Lafur yr Alban a oedd yn cefnogi a rhai'n gwrthwynebu hefyd. Rwy'n credu mai dyna natur y ddeddfwriaeth benodol honno. Ond mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi bod yn gwbl glir ynglŷn â'r cyfeiriad rydym eisiau mynd iddo. Rwy'n siŵr fod manylion hynny'n rhywbeth a fyddai'n cael ei ystyried os a phan gawn gymhwysedd deddfwriaethol yn y maes.
English: I thank the Member. Whilst we have not committed to a pilot, we recognise the potential benefits of a shorter working week alongside other forms of flexible working. We are committed to working with social partners to encourage progressive working practices.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod. Er nad ydym wedi ymrwymo i gynllun peilot, rydym yn cydnabod manteision posibl wythnos waith fyrrach ochr yn ochr â mathau eraill o weithio hyblyg. Rydym wedi ymrwymo i weithio gyda phartneriaid cymdeithasol i annog arferion gweithio blaengar.
English: I'm grateful to the Counsel General for his answer this afternoon. I'm sure he'll be aware of the report published just yesterday by the Senedd's Petitions Committee, which I Chair. This report was endorsed by the majority of the committee, and it did recommend a four-day-week trial within the public sector in Wales. The pilot will build on the evidence of the private sector trials that have demonstrated already an increase in productivity and the benefits to an employee. Counsel General, this is no doubt a bold proposal, but it is one that might be challenging. But, just because something in challenging, does not mean we should not do it. Across the world, four-day-week trials have demonstrated success in increasing that productivity and improving the mental and physical health of workers and helping them upskill too. Can I ask you, Counsel General, will you commit to looking further at this matter, discussing with your Cabinet colleagues within Welsh Government, and coming back to this Senedd with a fuller report on the powers that we have to take this bold step forward?
Welsh: Rwy'n ddiolchgar i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol am ei ateb y prynhawn yma. Rwy'n siŵr y bydd yn ymwybodol o'r adroddiad a gyhoeddwyd ddoe gan Bwyllgor Deisebau'r Senedd a gadeirir gennyf. Cafodd yr adroddiad ei gymeradwyo gan fwyafrif o'r pwyllgor, ac fe wnaeth argymell treialu wythnos pedwar diwrnod o fewn y sector cyhoeddus yng Nghymru. Bydd y peilot yn adeiladu ar dystiolaeth treialon y sector preifat sydd eisoes wedi dangos cynnydd mewn cynhyrchiant a'r manteision i weithiwr. Gwnsler Cyffredinol, mae'n siŵr fod hwn yn gynnig beiddgar, ond mae'n un a allai fod yn heriol. Ond nid yw'r ffaith bod rhywbeth yn heriol yn golygu na ddylem ei wneud. Ar draws y byd, mae treialon wythnos pedwar diwrnod wedi dangos llwyddiant o ran cynyddu cynhyrchiant a gwella iechyd meddwl a chorfforol gweithwyr a'u helpu i uwchsgilio hefyd. A gaf fi ofyn i chi, Gwnsler Cyffredinol, a wnewch chi ymrwymo i edrych ymhellach ar y mater hwn, a thrafod gyda'ch cyd-Weinidogion Llywodraeth Cymru, a dod yn ôl i'r Senedd hon gydag adroddiad llawnach ar y pwerau sydd gennym i gymryd y cam beiddgar hwn ymlaen?
English: I'm pleased this question has been raised today, and I thank the Member for Alyn and Deeside for bringing it up, as it's a perfect example of utter hypocrisy in the Welsh Labour Party. In one breath, they support the union paymasters who are hell-bent on bringing this country to its knees, with strike after strike after strike, but then, in the other breath, they're asking people to work fewer days and bring productivity and wages down. My constituents who work in Flintshire and the Deeside area are facing rising mortgages, higher energy bills, soaring prices across the board, and they want to do some overtime, work that extra hour or two, just to keep the wolf from the door, and the local Members want them to work less and reduce their prospects. You couldn't make it up. So, when will we see a Labour Party and a Welsh Government that truly supports the working people of north-east Wales and supports people who want to get on in life, rather than holding them down?
Welsh: Rwy'n falch fod y cwestiwn hwn wedi'i godi heddiw, a diolch i'r Aelod dros Alun a Glannau Dyfrdwy am ei ofyn, gan ei fod yn enghraifft berffaith o ragrith llwyr yn y Blaid Lafur Gymreig. Mewn un anadl, maent yn cefnogi tâl-feistri'r undebau sy'n dal i fod yn benderfynol o ddifa'r wlad, gyda streic ar ôl streic ar ôl streic, ond gyda'r anadl nesaf, maent yn gofyn i bobl weithio llai o ddyddiau a gostwng chynhyrchiant a chyflogau. Mae fy etholwyr sy'n gweithio yn sir y Fflint ac ardal Glannau Dyfrdwy yn wynebu morgeisi cynyddol, biliau ynni uwch, prisiau uchel am bob dim, ac maent am weithio goramser, gweithio awr neu ddwy ychwanegol, i gadw'r blaidd o'r drws, ac mae'r Aelodau lleol am iddynt weithio llai a lleihau eu rhagolygon. Mae'n anghredadwy. Felly, pryd y gwelwn Blaid Lafur a Llywodraeth Cymru sydd o ddifrif yn cefnogi gweithwyr gogledd-ddwyrain Cymru ac yn cefnogi pobl sydd eisiau camu ymlaen mewn bywyd, yn hytrach na'u dal yn ôl?
English: Well, I'm sure, had the Member been around at the appropriate time, you would have been making exactly that speech when we went from seven days to a six-day working week, and I suppose you're still angry about the fact that we don't send children under 12 down the coal mines. Oh, I forgot - you actually closed most of the coal mines, so that probably dealt with that particular issue. I note, as well, I'm sure you're probably still a supporter of the position that the Conservative Party took when it opposed the minimum wage and all the things that were said about the minimum wage at that particular time. So, listen, I hear what you say. I'm afraid you are still living in the Victorian age. We are now living in the twenty-first century and we want to look after the people who work for a living, and we want to have a good and efficient and productive economy.
Welsh: Wel, pe bai'r Aelod wedi bod o gwmpas ar yr adeg honno, rwy'n siŵr y byddech wedi bod yn gwneud yn union yr un araith pan aethom o wythnos waith saith diwrnod i wythnos waith chwe diwrnod, ac rwy'n tybio eich bod yn dal yn ddig nad ydym yn anfon plant o dan 12 oed i lawr y pyllau glo. O, fe anghofiais - fe wnaethoch chi gau'r rhan fwyaf o'r pyllau glo, felly mae'n debyg fod hynny wedi cael gwared ar y broblem honno. Rwy'n siŵr hefyd eich bod yn dal i gefnogi safbwynt y Blaid Geidwadol pan wrthwynebodd yr isafswm cyflog a'r holl bethau a ddywedwyd am yr isafswm cyflog ar y pryd. Felly, gwrandewch, rwy'n clywed beth a ddywedwch. Mae arnaf ofn eich bod chi'n dal i fyw yn Oes Fictoria. Rydym bellach yn byw yn yr unfed ganrif ar hugain ac rydym eisiau gofalu am y bobl sy'n gweithio am eu bywoliaeth, ac rydym eisiau cael economi dda ac effeithlon a chynhyrchiol.
English: Determining legal expertise is a matter for the chair to the inquiry. The Welsh Government is committed to supporting the inquiry, and has been proactive in making the inquiry aware of Wales's constitutional and legal arrangements so that levels of expertise can be assessed.
Welsh: Mater i gadeirydd yr ymchwiliad yw penodi arbenigedd cyfreithiol. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ymrwymo i gefnogi'r ymchwiliad, a bu'n rhagweithiol wrth fynd ati i wneud yr ymchwiliad yn ymwybodol o drefniadau cyfansoddiadol a chyfreithiol Cymru fel bod modd asesu lefelau o arbenigedd.
English: If I could draw Members' attention to my declaration of interest. Of the 12 King's Counsel appointed and the 50 junior barristers appointed to the UK COVID inquiry, not one is based in Wales. That, of course, is not the position for Scotland or Northern Ireland. They would never put up with that, would they, Cwnsler Cyffredinol? Wales, once again, seems to be the forgotten nation - surely another strong argument for a Wales COVID inquiry. What action are you taking to remedy this situation and to ensure that the UK-wide inquiry reflects the devolved system here in Wales? Diolch yn fawr.
Welsh: Os caf dynnu sylw'r Aelodau at fy natganiad o fuddiant. O'r 12 Cwnsler y Brenin, a'r 50 bargyfreithiwr iau a benodwyd i ymchwiliad COVID y DU, nid oes yr un ohonynt wedi eu lleoli yng Nghymru. Nid dyna'r sefyllfa yn yr Alban na Gogledd Iwerddon wrth gwrs. Ni fyddent byth yn goddef hynny, na fyddent, Gwnsler Cyffredinol? Mae'n ymddangos mai Cymru, unwaith eto, yw'r genedl a anghofiwyd - dadl gref arall dros ymchwiliad COVID i Gymru. Pa gamau a gymerwyd gennych i unioni'r sefyllfa a sicrhau bod ymchwiliad y DU yn adlewyrchu'r system ddatganoledig yma yng Nghymru? Diolch yn fawr.
English: Thank you for the question. The points you raise in terms of the Welsh legal profession, I think, are important ones. The UK inquiry team did indicate its intention to draw staff and legal support from across the UK, with the Welsh Government inquiry team recommending to them that advice be sought from the bar's Wales and Chester circuit. It is the case, of course, in terms of the legal representation being organised by the Welsh Government, that there is significant input from the Welsh bar, and obviously I will do everything I can, in every sphere that I work in, to actually promote the interests of the use of the Welsh legal profession where that is appropriate, and, of course, issues that may arise. Equally so, one issue the Welsh Government has pressed is very much the ability, and the confirmation that it will happen, of the use of Welsh language within those inquiry proceedings. In terms of the inquiry itself, for me, the crux, the important thing, is what is the most effective way to ensure that the questions that society at large has, that the families of the bereaved have, with regard to COVID, are properly capable of being answered. What is the correct mechanism for ensuring that there are powers to ensure that evidence is available, that the witnesses are available, that everything that is necessary in order to answer those questions is done? That is why the Welsh Government has adopted the position that it has. But, I can confirm, again, and reiterate that of course there will be Welsh lawyers that are involved in the Welsh Government's representations to that COVID inquiry.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiwn. Mae'r pwyntiau a wnewch am y proffesiwn cyfreithiol Cymreig yn rhai pwysig yn fy marn i. Nododd tîm ymchwiliad y DU ei fwriad i geisio cymorth staff a chymorth cyfreithiol o bob rhan o'r DU, gyda thîm ymchwiliad Llywodraeth Cymru yn argymell iddynt y dylid gofyn am gyngor o gylchdaith Cymru a Chaer y bar. Mae'n wir, wrth gwrs, o ran y gynrychiolaeth gyfreithiol sy'n cael ei threfnu gan Lywodraeth Cymru, fod mewnbwn sylweddol gan y bar yng Nghymru, ac yn amlwg fe wnaf bopeth a allaf, ym mhob agwedd ar fy ngwaith, i hyrwyddo manteision defnyddio'r proffesiwn cyfreithiol Cymreig lle bo hynny'n briodol, a materion a allai godi wrth gwrs. Yn yr un modd, un mater y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi pwyso amdano yw'r gallu i ddefnyddio'r Gymraeg yn nhrefniadau'r ymchwiliad, a'r cadarnhad y bydd yn digwydd. O ran yr ymchwiliad ei hun, i mi, yr hyn sy'n hollbwysig, yw beth yw'r ffordd fwyaf effeithiol o sicrhau bod y cwestiynau sydd gan gymdeithas yn gyffredinol, y cwestiynau y mae teuluoedd mewn profedigaeth oherwydd COVID am gael ateb priodol iddynt. Beth yw'r mecanwaith cywir ar gyfer sicrhau bod yna bwerau i sicrhau bod tystiolaeth ar gael, fod y tystion ar gael, fod popeth sy'n angenrheidiol er mwyn ateb y cwestiynau hynny'n cael ei wneud? Dyna pam mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi mabwysiadu'r safbwynt sydd ganddi. Ond gallaf gadarnhau unwaith eto, ac ailadrodd wrth gwrs y bydd yna gyfreithwyr Cymreig yn rhan o gynrychiolaeth Llywodraeth Cymru i'r ymchwiliad COVID.
English: The Public Order Bill impacts on the vital right of people in Wales to have their voices heard and express their concerns freely. I will continue to impress upon the UK Government that Wales's views must be heard in respect of the importance of the right to protest.
Welsh: Mae'r Bil Trefn Gyhoeddus yn effeithio ar hawl hanfodol pobl yng Nghymru i sicrhau bod eu lleisiau'n cael eu clywed ac y gallant fynegi eu pryderon yn ddirwystr. Byddaf yn parhau i bwyso ar Lywodraeth y DU fod yn rhaid clywed barn Cymru ynghylch pwysigrwydd yr hawl i brotestio.
English: Before you answer, Counsel General, for the record it's Brynle Williams.
Welsh: Cyn i chi ateb, Gwnsler Cyffredinol, ar gyfer y cofnod, ei enw oedd Brynle Williams.
English: This Bill is unnecessary and it is ill-conceived. It cuts across devolution and attempts to undermine our social partnership approach here in Wales.
Welsh: Mae'r Bil hwn yn ddiangen ac mae'n annoeth. Mae'n torri ar draws datganoli ac yn ceisio tanseilio ein dull o weithredu mewn partneriaeth gymdeithasol yma yng Nghymru.
English: Yet again, Counsel General, another example of aggressive legislation from the UK Tories, one that seeks to divide working people. It seeks to cover for the 12 years of Tory failure by blaming key workers. They are the very workers they clapped for during the pandemic. Counsel General, the right to strike is a basic right, and leaders across the United Kingdom should always seek to negotiate, not threaten key workers by removing their rights. Next week, I'll be standing in solidarity with the Wales TUC at their national rally to defend working people's freedoms. This is an incredibly important matter for working people and their families across Wales. As this aggressive piece of legislation proceeds through the House of Commons, will you come back to this Chamber and update Members of the Senedd on the steps the Welsh Government can take to mitigate its impact in Wales?
Welsh: Unwaith eto, Gwnsler Cyffredinol, enghraifft arall o ddeddfwriaeth ymosodol gan Dorïaid y DU, un sy'n ceisio creu rhaniadau rhwng gweithwyr. Mae'n ceisio gwneud iawn am 12 mlynedd o fethiant y Torïaid drwy feio gweithwyr allweddol. Hwy yw'r union weithwyr y gwnaethant glapio iddynt yn ystod y pandemig. Gwnsler Cyffredinol, mae'r hawl i streicio'n hawl sylfaenol, a dylai arweinwyr ar draws y Deyrnas Unedig bob amser geisio trafod, nid bygwth gweithwyr allweddol drwy gael gwared ar eu hawliau. Yr wythnos nesaf, byddaf yn sefyll mewn undod â TUC Cymru yn eu rali genedlaethol i amddiffyn rhyddid gweithwyr. Mae hwn yn fater hynod bwysig i weithwyr a'u teuluoedd ledled Cymru. Wrth i'r ddeddfwriaeth ymosodol hon wneud ei ffordd drwy Dŷ'r Cyffredin, a wnewch chi ddod yn ôl i'r Siambr hon a rhoi'r wybodaeth ddiweddaraf i Aelodau'r Senedd ar y camau y gall Llywodraeth Cymru eu cymryd i liniaru ei heffaith yng Nghymru?
English: I think that Member might have heard some of the comments I just made.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu efallai fod yr Aelod wedi clywed rhai o'r sylwadau a wneuthum yn awr.
English: Yes, I did.
Welsh: Do, fe wneuthum.
English: I'm happy to go straight into the Member's supplementary question.
Welsh: Rwy'n hapus i fynd yn syth at gwestiwn atodol yr Aelod.
English: Diolch yn fawr. I'm not quite sure why those hadn't been grouped together. Of course, this Bill does extend to Wales and, as you suggested, grants sweeping powers to the Secretary of State in Whitehall. At length in the previous Bill, safety was discussed; well, safety has been removed completely. Public safety has been removed completely from this Bill. A Secretary of State sitting in Whitehall could stop a strike because of the impact it has on the rush hour in Cardiff, or could prevent a strike because it possibly might lead to hospital appointments being cancelled or could lead to classes being disrupted. Basically, in effect, a Secretary of State sitting in Whitehall could stop all future strikes here in Wales. So, what discussions have you had with the UK Government to ensure that the criteria for the minimum service levels will still allow effective striking to happen in Wales? Diolch yn fawr.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr. Nid wyf yn hollol siŵr pam na chafodd y rheini eu grwpio gyda'i gilydd. Wrth gwrs, mae'r Bil hwn yn ymestyn i Gymru ac fel yr awgrymwyd gennych, yn rhoi pwerau ysgubol i'r Ysgrifennydd Gwladol yn Whitehall. Trafodwyd diogelwch yn helaeth yn y Bil blaenorol; wel, mae diogelwch wedi'i ddileu'n llwyr. Mae diogelwch y cyhoedd wedi'i dynnu allan o'r Bil hwn yn gyfan gwbl. Fe allai Ysgrifennydd Gwladol yn Whitehall atal streic oherwydd yr effaith y mae'n ei chael ar yr awr frys yng Nghaerdydd, neu fe allai atal streic oherwydd y posibilrwydd y gallai arwain at ganslo apwyntiadau ysbyty neu y gallai arwain at darfu ar ddosbarthiadau. Yn y bôn, i bob pwrpas, gallai Ysgrifennydd Gwladol yn Whitehall atal pob streic yma yng Nghymru yn y dyfodol. Felly, pa drafodaethau a gawsoch gyda Llywodraeth y DU i sicrhau y bydd y meini prawf ar gyfer lefelau gwasanaeth lleiaf yn dal i ganiatáu i streicio effeithiol ddigwydd yng Nghymru? Diolch yn fawr.
English: Thank you, again, for the question. Representations have already been made. You'll be aware that I am - and, indeed, the First Minister is - very much on the record in a similar tone. It will be raised at future meetings that will be taking place. But, of course, in terms of the UK Government, I have to say, on this Bill, we have had no engagement. There has been no consultation, no engagement with the Welsh Government whatsoever on this. It's worth also saying, on the point you raised about safety, that there is no impact assessment with this Bill yet. There was an impact assessment on the original one, the transport minimal service levels Bill, but, of course, they probably didn't want to go down the road of the impact assessment this time, because the last impact assessment basically said the likely consequence would be there would probably be an increase in forms of industrial action short of a strike. So, we wait and see what might appear then and what might happen to this Bill, and if it does go through, what may then happen in terms of any potential legal challenges. Again, what I can say is that I will ensure that, if there are valid legal interests that we have, and powers I have as Counsel General in terms of intervention, that is something I will give very serious consideration to.
Welsh: Diolch eto am y cwestiwn. Mae sylwadau eisoes wedi'u cyflwyno. Fe fyddwch yn ymwybodol fy mod i - a'r Prif Weinidog yn wir - wedi ein cofnodi'n defnyddio cywair tebyg. Bydd yn cael ei godi mewn cyfarfodydd a fydd yn digwydd yn y dyfodol. Ond wrth gwrs, o ran Llywodraeth y DU, mae'n rhaid imi ddweud, ar y Bil hwn, na chawsom unrhyw ymgysylltiad. Ni chafwyd unrhyw ymgynghoriad, nac unrhyw ymgysylltiad o gwbl â Llywodraeth Cymru ar hyn. Mae'n werth dweud hefyd, ar y pwynt a godwyd gennych ynghylch diogelwch, nad oes asesiad effaith ar gyfer y Bil hwn eto. Roedd asesiad effaith ar yr un gwreiddiol, y Bil lefelau gwasanaeth lleiaf ar gyfer trafnidiaeth, ond wrth gwrs, mae'n siŵr nad oeddent am fynd ar drywydd asesiad effaith y tro hwn, oherwydd, yn y bôn, dywedodd yr asesiad effaith diwethaf mai'r canlyniad tebygol fyddai cynnydd mewn mathau o weithredu diwydiannol ar wahân i streicio. Felly, rydym yn aros i weld beth allai ymddangos bryd hynny a beth allai ddigwydd i'r Bil hwn, ac os yw'n mynd rhagddo, beth all ddigwydd wedyn gydag unrhyw heriau cyfreithiol posibl. Eto, yr hyn y gallaf ei ddweud yw y byddaf yn sicrhau, os oes buddiannau cyfreithiol dilys gennym, a phwerau sydd gennyf fel Cwnsler Cyffredinol i ymyrryd, fod hynny'n rhywbeth y byddaf yn rhoi ystyriaeth ddifrifol iawn iddo.
English: Thank you for the question. After Royal Assent, the Act's provisions will be commenced in stages, the first products being banned potentially in the autumn. We are working closely with those impacted by the Bill to ensure the bans are implemented successfully.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiwn. Ar ôl Cydsyniad Brenhinol, bydd darpariaethau'r Ddeddf yn cael eu cychwyn fesul cam, gyda'r cynhyrchion cyntaf yn cael eu gwahardd yn yr hydref o bosibl. Rydym yn gweithio'n agos gyda'r rhai yr effeithir arnynt gan y Bil i sicrhau bod y gwaharddiadau'n cael eu gweithredu'n llwyddiannus.
English: Thank you. Following a request by the Welsh Government, the Business Committee agreed not to refer the Bill to a responsible committee for Stage 1 scrutiny. According to the Business Committee report, one of the reasons why you requested an expedited timetable for Senedd scrutiny was, and I quote, 'due to its intention to use the Bill as a practical example to support its case in relation to the UK internal market Act in the Supreme Court.' After the Welsh Government succeeded to cut our democratic scrutiny short and pass the Bill, you then advised the Legislation, Justice and Constitution Committee on 16 January that you've chosen not to use the legislation to challenge the internal market Act. I believe that your Welsh Government has played fast and loose with this Welsh Parliament's powers to use this legislative process to benefit your own legal agenda. Will you now apologise for your Welsh Government's actions and make a commitment on the public record that you acknowledge that the reason for challenging any law is in order to achieve the objective of the legislation and not to armour some politically motivated legal battle? Diolch.
Welsh: Diolch. Yn dilyn cais gan Lywodraeth Cymru, cytunodd y Pwyllgor Busnes i beidio â chyfeirio'r Bil at bwyllgor cyfrifol ar gyfer gwaith craffu Cyfnod 1. Yn ôl adroddiad y Pwyllgor Busnes, un o'r rhesymau pam y gwnaethoch ofyn am amserlen gyflymach ar gyfer gwaith craffu'r Senedd oedd, ac rwy'n dyfynnu, 'oherwydd ei fwriad i ddefnyddio'r Bil fel enghraifft ymarferol i gefnogi ei achos mewn perthynas â Deddf marchnad fewnol y DU yn y Goruchaf Lys.' Wedi i Lywodraeth Cymru lwyddo i gwtogi ein proses graffu ddemocrataidd a phasio'r Bil, fe wnaethoch gynghori'r Pwyllgor Deddfwriaeth, Cyfiawnder a'r Cyfansoddiad ar 16 Ionawr eich bod wedi dewis peidio â defnyddio'r ddeddfwriaeth i herio Deddf y farchnad fewnol. Credaf fod eich Llywodraeth Cymru wedi bod yn fyrbwyll gyda phwerau'r Senedd hon yng Nghymru er mwyn defnyddio'r broses ddeddfwriaethol hon er budd eich agenda gyfreithiol eich hun. A wnewch chi ymddiheuro yn awr am weithredoedd eich Llywodraeth yng Nghymru a gwneud ymrwymiad cyhoeddus eich bod yn cydnabod mai'r rheswm dros herio unrhyw ddeddf yw i gyflawni amcan y ddeddfwriaeth ac nid fel arf mewn rhyw frwydr gyfreithiol wedi'i chymell yn wleidyddol? Diolch.