English: Thank you for the questions. On care homes, we've actually picked up a number of positive cases from our regular programme of testing of care home staff, and that's allowed us to understand what's taking place there and to isolate not just the staff, but to then have some protection and additional testing around the care homes affected. It is literally a handful - less than a handful - at present, but we're taking that seriously because we know the significant harm that can be caused if there's a real outbreak within a care home - not just a closed environment, but a closed environment with very vulnerable people, vulnerable to much more significant harm from this virus. It's also reflective of what's happening within the wider community, and so there's a challenge there about how we protect people. And again, it goes back - it still starts off with contact in the home and if people are mixing in the home in larger numbers, it's likely to come through, as it has done, in a range of pubs and people coming into those pubs and if they're not respecting the social distancing guidance and the rules in those pubs as well, well, it should be no surprise that staff and people who drink there are then going to walk away with coronavirus as well. So, businesses need to do their part in following the rules with their staff to protect their staff and their customers, but customers who want to continue to enjoy the ability to go to have a drink or go out for a meal need to follow the rules as well, because otherwise, we will need to take more significant measures than I've outlined already. It's also the case that every local authority is looking at enforcement and the number of spot checks that are taking place, and that is producing a response from the more responsible parts of the business and we're also picking up issues that do require improvement as well. On shielding, the starting point is that people who have previously shielded should follow the advice and be particularly stringent about doing so, particularly that point about who you have within your own home, about following the advice on social distancing. Our chief medical officers across the UK are looking again at shielding. It's a particularly medical model that's been adopted in the past. Now, that doesn't mean to say that it wasn't worth having, but for the next phase, we've got to consider whether that's the right approach, because we understand now that people at the greatest risk of harm aren't all neatly packaged up in the list of medical conditions. We know that if you're of certain ethnic minority origins, if you're black African or Caribbean, if you're from a south Asian origin or if you're overweight as well, you are in a higher risk category, but that won't be picked up in a medical list, necessarily, on itself, unless you have a diagnosed condition. The same for areas where there is a higher degree of socioeconomic disadvantage - much greater risk of harm, yet not picked up in our shielding advice. We're looking for a more nuanced form of advice that will still help people to understand how they can manage their risks. And on testing, I'm happy to confirm that I do expect there to be more testing resources from the Welsh Government and national health service provision. In particular, the testing centre in Cwm should benefit from an additional lane, where those tests will go to Public Health Wales labs to supplement the challenges that we still see within the UK-led lighthouse lab testing programme.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiynau. O ran cartrefi gofal, rydym ni mewn gwirionedd wedi canfod nifer o achosion cadarnhaol o'n rhaglen reolaidd o brofi staff cartrefi gofal, ac mae hynny wedi ein galluogi i ddeall beth sy'n digwydd yn y fan yna ac ynysu nid yn unig y staff, ond wedyn cael rhywfaint o amddiffyniad a phrofion ychwanegol yn y cartrefi gofal yr effeithir arnynt. Mae'n llythrennol yn ddyrnaid - llai na dyrnaid - ar hyn o bryd, ond rydym yn cymryd hynny o ddifrif oherwydd gwyddom am y niwed sylweddol y gellir ei achosi os bydd yr haint yn lledu mewn cartref gofal - nid amgylchedd caeedig yn unig, ond amgylchedd caeedig gyda phobl agored iawn i niwed, sy'n agored i niwed llawer mwy sylweddol o'r feirws hwn. Mae hefyd yn adlewyrchu'r hyn sy'n digwydd yn y gymuned ehangach, ac felly mae her ynglŷn â sut yr ydym yn amddiffyn pobl. Ac eto, mae'n deillio'n ôl i - mae'n dal i ddechrau gyda chyswllt yn y cartref ac os yw pobl yn cymysgu yn y cartref mewn niferoedd mwy, mae'n debygol o ymddangos, fel y mae wedi gwneud, mewn amrywiaeth o dafarndai a phobl sy'n mynd i'r tafarndai hynny ac os nad ydynt yn parchu'r canllawiau ymbellhau cymdeithasol a'r rheolau yn y tafarndai hynny hefyd, wel, ni ddylai fod yn syndod y bydd staff a phobl sy'n yfed yno wedyn yn cerdded ymaith gyda'r coronafeirws arnyn nhw hefyd. Felly, mae angen i fusnesau wneud eu rhan i ddilyn y rheolau gyda'u staff i amddiffyn eu staff a'u cwsmeriaid, ond mae angen i gwsmeriaid sydd eisiau parhau i fwynhau'r gallu i fynd i gael diod neu fynd allan am bryd o fwyd ddilyn y rheolau hefyd, oherwydd fel arall, bydd angen i ni weithredu mesurau mwy sylweddol nag yr wyf wedi eu hamlinellu eisoes. Mae hi hefyd yn wir fod pob awdurdod lleol yn ystyried gorfodi a'r nifer y gwiriadau ar hap sy'n digwydd, ac mae hynny'n ennyn ymateb gan rannau mwy cyfrifol y byd busnes ac rydym ni hefyd yn canfod materion y mae angen gwella arnynt hefyd. O ran y rhestrau gwarchod, y man cychwyn yw y dylai pobl sydd wedi bod ar y rhestr warchod o'r blaen ddilyn y cyngor a bod yn arbennig o gaeth ynghylch gwneud hynny, yn enwedig yr elfen yna ynglŷn â phwy sy'n dod i'ch cartref, ynghylch dilyn y cyngor ar gadw pellter cymdeithasol. Mae ein prif swyddogion meddygol ledled y DU yn edrych eto ar lunio rhestrau gwarchod. Mae'n fodel meddygol arbennig sydd wedi'i fabwysiadu yn y gorffennol. Nawr, nid yw hynny'n golygu nad oedd gwerth iddo, ond ar gyfer y cam nesaf, mae'n rhaid i ni ystyried ai dyna'r dull cywir, oherwydd rydym ni'n deall nawr nad yw pobl sydd fwyaf tebygol o gael niwed i gyd wedi'u pecynnu'n daclus yn y rhestr o gyflyrau meddygol. Gwyddom os ydych chi o rai cefndiroedd lleiafrifoedd ethnig, os ydych chi o dras du Affricanaidd neu Garibïaidd, os ydych chi o darddiad de Asiaidd neu os ydych chi dros eich pwysau hefyd, eich bod mewn categori risg uwch, ond ni fydd hynny wedi ei gynnwys mewn rhestr feddygol, o reidrwydd, o ran ei hun, oni bai eich bod wedi cael diagnosis o gyflwr. Mae'r un peth yn wir ar gyfer ardaloedd lle mae mwy o anfantais economaidd-gymdeithasol - llawer mwy o berygl o niwed, ond heb ei nodi yn ein cyngor gwarchod. Rydym yn chwilio am fath mwy penodol o gyngor a fydd yn dal i helpu pobl i ddeall sut y gallan nhw reoli eu risgiau. Ac ynglŷn â phrofion, rwy'n hapus i gadarnhau fy mod yn disgwyl cael mwy o adnoddau profi gan Lywodraeth Cymru a darpariaeth gan y gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol. Yn benodol, dylai'r ganolfan brofi yn y Cwm elwa ar lôn ychwanegol, lle caiff y profion hynny eu hanfon i labordai Iechyd Cyhoeddus Cymru i ategu'r heriau yr ydym ni yn eu gweld o hyd yn rhaglen brofi Labordai Goleudy y mae'r DU yn arwain arni.