English: As we've heard, this Order has been published in isolation, to all intents and purposes. It's supposed to be a package of five pieces of legislation feeding into a common framework and that should be seen alongside this concordat that is to be agreed on how Governments are to come together to make it work. Now, asking us to pass this Order today without us having seen the Order in that broader context, with all the other pieces of the jigsaw, to me, is a mistake. And, of course, that is something that we were told that we would see before we made the decision. But as we've heard from the Chair of the Legislation, Justice and Constitution Committee and the Chair of the climate change committee, we've had to make that decision without having seen the common framework, which, to me, is an error. As a result of that, of course, we don't have clarity on which decision-making processes will be in place across the four nations in the future. We don't have sufficient clarity as to how any dispute will be resolved in the longer term. And I think the fact that the Minister referred, in her opening comments, to a pro tem arrangement speaks volumes on the relationship between the Governments in jointly developing the programme we have before us today. There's no clarity as to where the money will go - where will the revenue go? Will it go back to the Treasury in London, as is currently the case, or will there be an industrial decarbonisation fund, as the Minister is eager to see? And, if the money is shared across the UK, how will that be done? We don't know if it will be, but if it were, how would it be done? There are so many fundamental questions that remain unanswered.
Welsh: Fel rŷn ni wedi clywed, mae'r Gorchymyn yma wedi cael ei gyhoeddi ar ei ben ei hun, i bob pwrpas - in isolation fel maen nhw'n ei ddweud yn Saesneg. Mae e i fod yn rhan o becyn o bum darn o ddeddfwriaeth oddi fewn i fframwaith cyffredin a bod hwnnw'n cael ei weld ochr yn ochr â'r concordat yma sydd i fod i gael ei gytuno ar sut mae Llywodraethau'n mynd i ddod at ei gilydd i wneud iddo fe weithio. Nawr, mae gofyn i ni basio'r Gorchymyn yma heddiw heb i ni allu gweld y Gorchymyn yma yn y cyd-destun ehangach yna o holl ddarnau eraill y jig-sô, i fi, yn gamgymeriad. Ac, wrth gwrs, mae hwnna'n rhywbeth a ddywedwyd wrthym ni y byddwn ni yn cael ei weld cyn ein bod ni'n gwneud y penderfyniad. Ond dyma ni, fel rŷn ni wedi clywed gan Gadeirydd y Pwyllgor Deddfwriaeth, Cyfiawnder a'r Cyfansoddiad a Chadeirydd y pwyllgor newid hinsawdd, yn gorfod gwneud y penderfyniad heb weld y cytundeb fframwaith cyffredin, sydd, i fi, yn gamgymeriad. O ganlyniad i hynny, wrth gwrs, does gyda ni ddim eglurder ynglŷn â pha brosesau gwneud penderfyniad fydd yna yn y dyfodol ar draws y pedair gwlad. Dŷn ni ddim yn ddigon eglur, yn fy marn i, ynglŷn â sut fydd unrhyw anghydweld rhwng y Llywodraethau'n cael ei ddatrys yn y tymor hir. A dwi'n meddwl bod y ffaith bod y Gweinidog wedi cyfeirio, yn ei sylwadau agoriadol, at ryw drefniant dros dro yn dweud cyfrolau am ble ydyn ni o safbwynt y berthynas rhwng y Llywodraethau yn cyd-ddatblygu'r cynllun sydd ger ein bron. Does dim eglurder, chwaith, o ran ble fydd y pres yn mynd - ble fydd y refeniw o'r cynllun yn mynd? Fydd e'n mynd yn ôl i boced y Trysorlys yn Llundain, fel sy'n digwydd ar hyn o bryd, neu a fydd yna gronfa dadgarboneiddio diwydiannol, fel y mae'r Gweinidog yn awyddus i'w weld? Os bydd y pres yn cael ei rannu ar draws y Deyrnas Unedig, sut fydd e'n cael ei rannu? Dŷn ni ddim yn gwybod os bydd e, wrth gwrs, ond sut fydd e'n cael ei rannu? Mae yna gymaint o gwestiynau sylfaenol heb eu hateb.