English: I thank David Rees for those questions; I heard them come in three categories, really. Firstly, in relation to the withdrawal agreement Bill, we have been consistent as a Government in pressing the principle that the constitutional conventions should be observed in full - i.e. that an LCM is presented to the Assembly, and we've obviously had that commitment from the UK Government. But the timescales are the question that he's addressing himself to, and I think that is a serious question. What is clear is that, if and when that is brought forward in Parliament, it will obviously be going through Parliament in a very, very, very shortened time frame. So, what would be going through customarily in months will be going through in weeks, perhaps less. So, clearly, our time here for reflection, for consent, will also be curtailed proportionately as well. So, the period that we would expect to enjoy to consider these things is likely to be very significantly curtailed, given where we are at the moment. I think we need to recognise that that is just a political reality of the situation in which we find ourselves at this eleventh hour without settled arrangements for resolving the situation that we're in. It certainly will have an impact on the time available to us here to consider those important questions. In relation to 'no deal' preparedness, he asks: is the Welsh Government doing everything possible? Well, we are doing all we can, but there are constraints of powers and constraints of resources, and there are constraints of the general exigency of things - just simply some things not being within our control. But there is an immense amount of work going on within Government and a reallocation of resource in order to prepare for that sort of outcome that is the last outcome that we want to see for Wales. But, as we have said consistently here, despite that, it's our responsibility as a Government to take those steps. But we would all feel, I hope, that that money and time and resource and energy, whilst necessary to be spent, hopefully will not be needed in due course, and just reflect, I think, on the other purposes to which that could have been put if we'd had a more orderly set of discussions than we are currently looking at. In relation to ongoing commitments, well, I think, in a sense, that comes back to the point that the Member started with - a statutory footing. The whole point of seeking a statutory footing for the involvement of the devolved administrations in the political declaration, in the supervision of that - which is the language that Welsh Government has suggested as a means of amending the withdrawal agreement - the whole point of that is to provide that level of assurance. Clearly, what we seek is a set of relationships that can survive any one individual or any group of individuals - that's a stable basis on which we want to be able to proceed. And the reason I know that's so important is because I felt the chill running round the Chamber when I said the words Prime Minister Johnson, Rees-Mogg or Raab.
Welsh: Diolch i David Rees am y cwestiynau hynny; clywais nhw'n dod mewn tri chategori, mewn gwirionedd. Yn gyntaf, yn gysylltiedig â'r Bil cytundeb ymadael, buom yn gyson fel Llywodraeth yn pwyso ar yr egwyddor y dylid cadw at y confensiynau cyfansoddiadol yn llawn - hynny yw, y cyflwynir cynnig cydsyniad deddfwriaethol i'r Cynulliad, ac rydym ni'n amlwg wedi cael yr ymrwymiad hwnnw gan Lywodraeth y DU. Ond yr amserlenni yw'r cwestiwn y mae'n holi yn ei gylch, ac rwy'n credu bod hynny'n gwestiwn difrifol. Yr hyn sy'n glir yw, os a phan gyflwynir hynny yn y Senedd, bydd yn amlwg yn mynd drwy'r Senedd mewn cyfnod byr iawn, iawn o amser. Felly, bydd yr hyn a fyddai fel arfer yn cymryd misoedd yn cymryd wythnosau, o bosib llai. Felly, yn amlwg, bydd yr amser a fydd gennym ni yn y fan yma ar gyfer myfyrio, i gydsynio, hefyd wedi ei gwtogi yn gymesur hefyd. Felly, mae'r cyfnod y gallem ni ei ddisgwyl i fwynhau ystyried y pethau hyn yn debygol o gael ei gwtogi yn sylweddol, o ystyried lle'r ydym ni arni ar hyn o bryd. Credaf fod angen inni gydnabod mai dyna yw realiti gwleidyddol y sefyllfa y cawn ein hunain ynddi ar yr unfed awr ar ddeg heb drefniadau sefydlog ar gyfer datrys y sefyllfa yr ydym ni ynddi. Bydd yn sicr yn cael effaith ar yr amser sydd ar gael inni yn y fan yma i ystyried y cwestiynau pwysig hynny. O ran pa mor barod ydym ni i adael heb gytundeb, mae'n gofyn: a yw Llywodraeth Cymru yn gwneud popeth posib? Wel, rydym ni'n gwneud popeth a allwn ni, ond ceir cyfyngiadau ar bwerau a chyfyngiadau ar adnoddau, ac mae cyfyngiadau o ran gofynion cyffredinol pethau - sef nad yw rhai pethau, mewn difrif, o fewn ein rheolaeth. Ond mae yna beth wmbreth o waith yn digwydd yn y Llywodraeth ac ailddyrannu adnoddau er mwyn paratoi ar gyfer y math hwnnw o ganlyniad sef y canlyniad diwethaf mae arnom ni eisiau ei weld i Gymru. Ond, fel yr ydym ni wedi dweud yn gyson yn y fan yma, er gwaethaf hynny, ein cyfrifoldeb ni fel Llywodraeth yw gwneud hynny. Ond mae pawb o'r un farn, gobeithio, bod yr arian a'r amser a'r adnoddau a'r ynni hwnnw, er bod angen buddsoddi ynddyn nhw, gobeithio na fydd mo'u hangen maes o law, ac rydym ni'n pendroni, rwy'n credu, ynghylch y dibenion eraill y gelllid bod wedi eu defnyddio ar eu cyfer pe baem ni wedi cael cyfres fwy trefnus o drafodaethau na'r rhai yr ydym ni'n dyst iddyn nhw ar hyn o bryd. O ran ymrwymiadau parhaus, wel, rwy'n credu, ar un ystyr, bod hynny'n dod yn ôl at sylw dechreuol yr Aelod - sail statudol. Holl ddiben ceisio sail statudol er mwyn cynnwys y gweinyddiaethau datganoledig yn y datganiad gwleidyddol, i oruchwylio hynny - sef y geiriad y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ei awgrymu fel ffordd o ddiwygio'r cytundeb ymadael - holl ddiben hynny yw rhoi'r graddau hynny o sicrwydd. Yn amlwg, yr hyn yr ydym ni'n ei geisio yw perthynas a all oroesi unrhyw unigolyn neu unrhyw grŵp o unigolion - mae hynny'n sail sefydlog yr ydym ni'n gobeithio gallu symud ymlaen arni. A'r rheswm fy mod i'n gwybod bod hynny mor bwysig yw imi deimlo'r ias aeth drwy'r Siambr pan ddywedais y geiriau y Prif Weinidog Johnson, Rees Mogg neu Raab.