techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Yes. I would like to first of all congratulate the pupils of Ysgol y Wern for being prepared to put a scheme together that shows us the way forward. I remember having milk in bottles at school years ago, and I don't doubt that they are the same plastic straws that we used in the 1970s that are used today. What is important now is that we don't just say, 'Thank you very much', and for nothing to happen as a result of what the children of Ysgol y Wern have done, but that we, as a committee, do what we can to put pressure on the Government to show that they do take this petition seriously. Because someone somewhere has to start good practice and make a start on these things, and the pupils of Ysgol y Wern have started in this regard, so we should support them as much as we can as a committee.
Welsh: Ie. Mi hoffwn i longyfarch, yn gyntaf, disgyblion Ysgol y Wern am fentro i roi cynllun at ei gilydd sydd yn dangos y ffordd ymlaen. Rydw i'n cofio cael llefrith mewn poteli yn yr ysgol flynyddoedd yn ôl ac nid wyf yn amau mai'r un gwellt plastig yr oeddem ni'n eu defnyddio yn ôl yn y 1970au sydd yn cael eu defnyddio rŵan. Beth sy'n bwysig rŵan ydy ein bod ni nid yn unig yn dweud, 'Diolch yn fawr', a bod dim byd yn digwydd yn sgil beth sydd wedi cael ei wneud gan blant Ysgol y Wern, ond ein bod ni, fel pwyllgor, yn gwneud beth y gallwn i bwyso ar y Llywodraeth i ddangos eu bod nhw'n cymryd y ddeiseb yma o ddifrif. Achos mae'n rhaid i rywun yn rhywle ddechrau arfer da a gwthio'r cwch i'r dŵr, ac mae disgyblion Ysgol y Wern wedi gwneud, felly mi ddylem ni eu cefnogi nhw gymaint ag y gallwn ni, fel pwyllgor.
English: We are very grateful for the work that has been done by the petitioner on this. We'll be questioning the Minister later on today, so I'm not sure whether there's any purpose to holding more of a discussion on that at present.
Welsh: Rydym ni'n ddiolchgar iawn am y gwaith sydd wedi cael ei wneud gan y deisebwr ar hyn. Rydym yn holi'r Gweinidog yn nes ymlaen heddiw, felly nid wyf yn siŵr a oes yna ddiben cael mwy o drafodaeth na hynny ar hyn o bryd.
English: Good morning. This is quite a simple question. We know what the evidence is that has come before us in support of putting CCTV in slaughterhouses. Now, we know that steps are being taken in other parts of the UK in this field, but why the slowness in Wales? What are the obstacles, as you see them?
Welsh: Bore da. Mae hwn yn gwestiwn eithaf syml. Rydym ni'n gwybod beth yw'r dystiolaeth sydd wedi'i rhoi o'n blaenau ni i gefnogi rhoi camerâu cylch cyfyng mewn lladd-dai. Nawr, rydym ni'n gwybod bod yna gamau'n cael eu cymryd mewn rhannau eraill o Brydain yn y maes hwn. Pam yr arafwch yma yng Nghymru? Beth ydy'r rhwystrau, fel rydych chi'n eu gweld nhw?
English: The first item on our agenda this afternoon is questions to the First Minister, and the first question is from David Melding.
Welsh: Yr eitem gyntaf ar ein hagenda ni y prynhawn yma yw'r cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog, ac mae'r cwestiwn cyntaf gan David Melding.
English: Our first priority after the Grenfell Tower tragedy has been to ensure residents of high-rise blocks are safe. We have provided £3 million to remove and replace cladding in the three social sector blocks affected, and we're working with private sector companies to establish their plans to complete the essential work.
Welsh: Ein blaenoriaeth gyntaf ar ôl trychineb Tŵr Grenfell fu sicrhau bod trigolion blociau uchel yn ddiogel. Rydym ni wedi darparu £3 miliwn i gael gwared ar gladin a gosod un newydd mewn tri bloc sector cymdeithasol a effeithiwyd, ac rydym ni'n gweithio gyda chwmnïau sector preifat i lunio eu cynlluniau i gwblhau'r gwaith hanfodol.
English: First Minister, of course, I acknowledge the work that's been done in the social sector, and very welcome it is, but, last month, Wales's chief fire adviser said that residents in private high-rise blocks may have to live with unsafe cladding for years because of wrangling over who should pay for it, and the Residential Landlords Association has called on the Welsh Government to offer short-term loans to the privately owned buildings for remedial works while the issue of liability is sorted out. Do you, First Minister, agree with me that, for the private sector, the priority should be to remove dangerous materials from these buildings and the issue surrounding liability contracts and responsibility should come later?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, wrth gwrs, rwy'n cydnabod y gwaith sydd wedi ei wneud yn y sector cymdeithasol, ac mae i'w groesawu'n fawr, ond y mis diwethaf, dywedodd prif gynghorydd tân Cymru efallai y bydd yn rhaid i breswylwyr mewn blociau uchel preifat fyw gyda chladin anniogel am flynyddoedd oherwydd dadlau dros pwy ddylai dalu amdano, ac mae Cymdeithas y Landlordiaid Preswyl wedi galw ar Lywodraeth Cymru i gynnig benthyciadau tymor byr i adeiladau sy'n eiddo preifat ar gyfer gwaith ailwampio tra bod y mater o atebolrwydd yn cael ei ddatrys. A ydych chi, Prif Weinidog, yn cytuno â mi mai'r flaenoriaeth i'r sector preifat ddylai fod cael gwared ar ddeunyddiau peryglus o'r adeiladau hyn ac y dylai'r mater yn ymwneud â chontractau atebolrwydd a chyfrifoldeb ddod yn ddiweddarach?
English: Usually, the structure and exterior of a building are matters for the landlord. In the case of a high-rise building, it's usually the management company in normal circumstances. They are responsible. Now, there are private companies across Wales who are looking at the buildings that they own and are taking action in order to make them safer, and so they should. Now, I'd urge those private companies who own buildings to do just that. They will have made a substantial amount of money in the main from those buildings. It's only right then that they contribute back to the upkeep of those buildings and not expect residents or tenants to pay.
Welsh: Materion i'r landlord yw strwythur yr adeilad a'r tu allan iddo fel rheol. O ran adeilad uchel, y cwmni rheoli sy'n gyfrifol o dan amgylchiadau arferol. Nhw sy'n gyfrifol. Nawr, ceir cwmnïau preifat ledled Cymru sy'n edrych ar yr adeiladau y maen nhw'n berchen arnynt ac sy'n cymryd camau i'w gwneud yn fwy diogel, ac mae hynny'n briodol. Nawr, byddwn yn annog y cwmnïau preifat hynny sy'n berchen ar adeiladau i wneud yn union hynny. Byddan nhw wedi gwneud swm sylweddol o arian o'r adeiladau hynny ar y cyfan. Mae'n gwbl briodol felly y dylen nhw gyfrannu at y gwaith o gynnal a chadw'r adeiladau hynny a pheidio â disgwyl i breswylwyr neu denantiaid dalu.
English: Just to expand on that point, I'm not entirely convinced that it's just as easy as saying that the management company should pay, because some of these management companies have previously been made up of residents associations, and that means that, by virtue of the set-up and the constitution of those management bodies, the residents themselves are the ones who will be paying. So, for example, in Prospect Place, you've got a mixture of people who are on benefits, you've got a mixture of professional people and elderly people. Some people will not be able to afford their contribution to that cladding. So, again, I would ask you: what is the Welsh Government doing in addressing this issue with the private sector? In the UK Government - I'm not one to praise them very often - they are having UK round-tables with the industry, telling them how they might address this issue, whereas I'm not seeing here the same type of urgent action on the private cladding that I've seen elsewhere.
Welsh: Dim ond i ymhelaethu ar y pwynt hwnnw, nid wyf i'n gwbl argyhoeddedig ei fod mor rhwydd â dweud y dylai'r cwmni rheoli dalu, gan fod rhai o'r cwmnïau rheoli hyn wedi eu cyfansoddi yn y gorffennol o gymdeithasau preswylwyr, ac mae hynny'n golygu, trwy rinwedd trefn a chyfansoddiad y cyrff rheoli hynny, mai'r preswylwyr eu hunain yw'r rhai a fydd yn talu. Felly, er enghraifft, yn Prospect Place, mae gennych chi gymysgedd o bobl sydd ar fudd-daliadau, mae gennych chi gymysgedd o bobl broffesiynol a phobl oedrannus. Ni fydd rhai pobl yn gallu fforddio eu cyfraniad at y cladin hwnnw. Felly, unwaith eto, rwyf yn gofyn i chi: beth mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn ei wneud i fynd i'r afael â'r mater hwn gyda'r sector preifat? Yn Llywodraeth y DU - nid wyf i'n un sydd yn eu canmol nhw yn aml iawn - maen nhw'n cynnal cyfarfodydd bwrdd crwn ar sail y DU gyfan gyda'r diwydiant, gan ddweud wrthyn nhw sut y gallent fynd i'r afael â'r mater hwn, ond nid wyf i'n gweld yr un math o weithredu brys yma o ran y cladin preifat yr wyf i wedi ei weld mewn mannau eraill.
English: Well, no, that simply isn't correct. There have been meetings with organisations. You're right to say that some management companies are made up entirely of residents within a building. They have to take on board the liabilities as well in those circumstances. It is an advantage to those who live in the building because they feel they have greater control over the communal area of the building, but there are disadvantages, particularly when it comes to liability. We will, of course, work with residents organisations. I can say that the Minister has already had a constructive meeting with representatives of the residents management company, the developer and managing agents for a number of the buildings that we're talking about. We'll continue with those meetings to see what help could be provided where there is genuine difficulty as far as some residents are concerned in order to make buildings safer.
Welsh: Wel, na, mae hynny'n gwbl anghywir. Cafwyd cyfarfodydd â sefydliadau. Rydych chi'n iawn i ddweud bod rhai cwmnïau rheoli wedi eu cyfansoddi'n llwyr o breswylwyr mewn adeilad. Mae'n rhaid iddynt hwythau ystyried yr atebolrwydd hefyd o dan yr amgylchiadau hynny. Mae'n fantais i'r rhai hynny sy'n byw yn yr adeilad gan eu bod nhw'n teimlo bod ganddyn nhw fwy o reolaeth dros ran cymunedol yr adeilad, ond ceir anfanteision, yn enwedig pan ddaw i atebolrwydd. Byddwn, wrth gwrs, yn gweithio gyda sefydliadau preswylwyr. Gallaf ddweud bod y Gweinidog eisoes wedi cael cyfarfod adeiladol gyda chynrychiolwyr y cwmni rheoli preswylwyr, y datblygwr ac asiantau rheoli nifer o'r adeiladau yr ydym ni'n sôn amdanynt. Byddwn yn parhau i gynnal y cyfarfodydd hynny i weld pa gymorth y gellid ei ddarparu lle ceir anhawster gwirioneddol cyn belled ag y mae rhai preswylwyr yn y cwestiwn er mwyn gwneud adeiladau yn fwy diogel.
English: Our response was published on 27 June. It does recognise, the original report, the progress that's been made, but there is no doubt that there is more that needs to be done to improve young people's mental health and well-being. I can assure Members that we will examine very carefully those recommendations we have accepted in principle and look very carefully at what more we might be able to do in order to provide assurances for the committee and the report that it has produced.
Welsh: Cyhoeddwyd ein hymateb ar 27 Mehefin. Mae yn cydnabod, yr adroddiad gwreiddiol, y cynnydd a wnaed, ond nid oes unrhyw amheuaeth bod mwy y mae angen ei wneud i wella iechyd meddwl a llesiant pobl ifanc. Gallaf sicrhau'r Aelodau y byddwn yn archwilio'n ofalus iawn yr argymhellion hynny yr ydym ni wedi eu derbyn mewn egwyddor ac yn edrych yn ofalus iawn ar beth arall y gallem ni ei wneud er mwyn rhoi sicrwydd i'r pwyllgor a'r adroddiad y mae wedi ei lunio.
English: First Minister, committee members from all parties, many education and health professionals, as well as schoolchildren, worked hard over many months to produce this report 'Mind over matter'. Our Chair then met with you personally to ask you to lead a cross-Government response, since we do need the health Secretary to engage with our work as much as the education Secretary. First Minister, what have you got to say to everyone who helped with our report now that they see you've accepted only seven of our 28 recommendations, and that eight have been rejected in whole or in part, while 13 have been described - and many regret Welsh Government's increasing use of this get-out phrase - as just accepted in principle?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, mae aelodau pwyllgor o bob plaid, llawer o weithwyr addysg ac iechyd proffesiynol, yn ogystal â phlant ysgol, wedi gweithio'n galed dros fisoedd lawer i lunio'r adroddiad hwn, 'Cadernid meddwl'. Cyfarfu ein Cadeirydd gyda chi yn bersonol wedyn i ofyn i chi arwain ymateb traws-Lywodraeth, gan ein bod ni angen i'r Ysgrifennydd iechyd ymgysylltu â'n gwaith gymaint â'r ysgrifennydd Addysg. Prif Weinidog, beth sydd gennych chi i'w ddweud wrth bawb a helpodd gyda'n hadroddiad nawr eu bod nhw'n gweld nad ydych chi wedi derbyn dim ond saith o'r 28 argymhelliad a wnaed, a bod wyth wedi eu gwrthod yn gyfan gwbl neu'n rhannol, tra dywedwyd bod 13 - ac mae llawer yn gresynu defnydd cynyddol Llywodraeth Cymru o'r ymadrodd ochr-gamu hwn - wedi eu derbyn mewn egwyddor yn unig?
English: Well, my understanding is that the report makes one key recommendation and 27 separate recommendations. We have accepted fully or in part 23 of those recommendations. It's important that, where there has been acceptance in principle, that we look very carefully and seriously at how to implement or take forward those recommendations, and we will do that because we are aware, of course, that mental health is one of the key priority areas for us, identified in 'Prosperity for All'.
Welsh: Wel, fy nealltwriaeth i yw bod yr adroddiad yn gwneud un argymhelliad allweddol a 27 o argymhellion ar wahân. Rydym ni wedi derbyn yn llawn neu'n rhannol 23 o'r argymhellion hynny. Mae'n bwysig, pan fo argymhellion yn cael eu derbyn mewn egwyddor, ein bod ni'n edrych yn ofalus iawn ac o ddifrif ar sut i weithredu neu fwrw ymlaen â'r argymhellion hynny, a byddwn yn gwneud hynny gan ein bod ni'n ymwybodol, wrth gwrs, fod iechyd meddwl yn un o'r meysydd o flaenoriaeth allweddol i ni, a nodwyd yn 'Ffyniant i Bawb'.
English: First Minister, you are very well aware of my deep concern about the Welsh Government response to 'Mind over matter'. Now, I don't want to pre-empt the committee debate tomorrow, because it wouldn't be possible to do this issue justice in a question, but can I just ask you to give me your assurance that you will very carefully consider what happens in that debate tomorrow, with a view to ensuring that we do actually get the step change that we so desperately need for our children and young people?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, rydych chi'n gwbl ymwybodol o fy mhryder mawr ynghylch ymateb Llywodraeth Cymru i 'Cadernid meddwl'. Nawr, nid wyf i eisiau achub y blaen ar y ddadl yn y pwyllgor yfory, gan na fyddai'n bosibl gwneud cyfiawnder â'r mater hwn mewn cwestiwn, ond a gaf i ofyn i chi roi eich sicrwydd i mi y gwnewch chi ystyried yn ofalus iawn yr hyn sy'n digwydd yn y ddadl honno yfory, gyda'r nod o sicrhau ein bod ni wir yn cael y newid sylweddol sydd mor daer ei angen arnom ni ar gyfer ein plant a'n pobl ifanc?
English: Yes. I can give my friend and colleague that assurance. I know that this is an issue that she has given a huge amount of commitment to, and I want to make sure that the Government's response in the longer term is the kind of response that she would want to see, and other members of the committee. There will, of course, be a fuller debate tomorrow, and these issues can be explored in greater depth at that point.
Welsh: Cewch. Gallaf roi'r sicrwydd hwnnw i'm ffrind a'm cyd-Aelod. Gwn fod hwn yn fater y mae wedi rhoi llawer iawn o ymroddiad iddo, ac rwyf i eisiau gwneud yn siŵr mai ymateb y Llywodraeth yn y tymor hwy yw'r math o ymateb y byddai hi, ac aelodau eraill y pwyllgor, eisiau ei weld. Bydd dadl lawnach yfory, wrth gwrs, a gellir ystyried y materion hyn yn fwy manwl bryd hynny.
English: I also want to record my disappointment with the poor response of the Government to the recommendations made in this report. It's clear to me that the Government doesn't share the same ambitions as committee members in terms of the transformational change required in this area, particularly in looking at the trajectory in terms of the increase in the problems that we see. We need to meet that challenge with far more enthusiasm rather than just accepting in principle, which, to me, is code for business as usual. Now, having more than one Cabinet Secretary or more than one Minister responsible for certain areas can be a strength, but, in this case, for me, it's clearly a weakness because there isn't one individual taking ownership of these improvements and driving those changes through. So, may I ask whether you as First Minister, because of the nature of the way in which the committee feels that this should be a national priority, will take that lead role?
Welsh: Rydw innau hefyd eisiau cofrestru fy siom, a dweud y gwir, ar ymateb cwbl lipa'r Llywodraeth i argymhellion yr adroddiad yma. Yn amlwg, i fi, nid yw'r Llywodraeth yn rhannu'r un uchelgais ag aelodau'r pwyllgor o safbwynt y newid trawsnewidiol sydd ei angen yn y maes yma, yn enwedig wrth edrych ar y trajectory o ran y cynnydd yn y broblem rydym ni'n ei weld. Mae'n rhaid i ni gwrdd â'r her yna gyda llawer mwy o frwdfrydedd na derbyn mewn egwyddor, sydd, i fi, yn god, yn aml iawn, am fusnes fel arfer. Nawr, mae cael mwy nag un Ysgrifennydd Cabinet neu mwy nag un Gweinidog yn gyfrifol am rai meysydd weithiau'n gallu bod yn gryfder, ond i fi, yn yr achos yma, mae'n amlwg yn wendid, oherwydd nid oes dim un person yn cymryd gafael, yn cymryd perchnogaeth o'r gwelliannau ac yn gyrru'r newidiadau yna drwyddo. Felly, a gaf i ofyn a wnewch chi, fel Prif Weinidog, oherwydd natur y modd y mae'r pwyllgor yn teimlo bod yn rhaid i hyn nawr fod yn flaenoriaeth genedlaethol, gymryd y rôl yna?
English: Well, if that's required, I will do that, of course, particularly with CAMHS. As I have some direct experience of CAHMS, and as I've seen some of the problems that people have had with their children particularly, this is something that I want to ensure is driven forward. May I tell Members this: I will take tomorrow's debate into account, and the Government will respond tomorrow, and beyond tomorrow, in order to ensure that we can strengthen the services available?
Welsh: Wel, os oes eisiau gwneud hynny, fe wnaf i hynny, wrth gwrs, yn enwedig gyda CAMHS. Fel rhywun sydd â phrofiad agos gyda CAMHS, a gwybod am a gweld rhai o'r problemau mae rhai pobl wedi cael ynglŷn â'u plant yn enwedig, mae hyn yn rhywbeth rydw i'n moyn sicrhau sy'n cael ei yrru ymlaen. A gaf i ddweud hyn wrth Aelodau: fe fyddaf i'n cymryd ystyriaeth, wrth gwrs, o'r ddadl fory ac, wrth gwrs, bydd y Llywodraeth yn ymateb fory, a hefyd ar ôl fory, er mwyn sicrhau ein bod ni'n gallu cryfhau'r gwasanaethau sydd ar gael i bobl?
English: Questions now from the party leaders, and, on behalf of the opposition, Paul Davies.
Welsh: Cwestiynau nawr gan arweinwyr y pleidiau, ac, ar ran yr wrthblaid, Paul Davies.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. First Minister, this week is of course the seventieth anniversary of the national health service, and I'm sure you will join me in celebrating the service and the tireless work of health professionals, who, over the years, have continued to deliver the best possible outcomes for patients across the UK. First Minister, in light of this significant milestone, are you ashamed to be the only leader of a UK nation to have ever cut an NHS budget?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, mae'r wythnos hon yn dathlu deng mlynedd a thrigain ers sefydlu'r gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol, wrth gwrs, ac rwy'n siŵr y gwnewch ichi ymuno â mi i ddathlu'r gwasanaeth a gwaith diflino gweithwyr iechyd proffesiynol, sydd, dros y blynyddoedd, wedi parhau i ddarparu'r canlyniadau gorau posibl i gleifion ledled y DU. Prif Weinidog, yng ngoleuni'r garreg filltir bwysig hon, a oes gennych chi gywilydd o fod yr unig arweinydd o wlad yn y DU erioed sydd wedi torri cyllideb y GIG?
English: Can I first of all pay just a word of tribute again to the Member's predecessor, with whom I crossed swords for seven years, I think, in this Chamber? It went very quickly, I suspect, but could I wish him the best for the future as well, and to welcome the Member for Preseli Pembrokeshire back to the role that he occupied back in 2011 for a short period of time? Can I assure him we are proud of the record we have on the NHS? We are the party that established the NHS. We spend more on health per head than England does. We spend more on health and social care by some distance than England does. And if he is suggesting to me that somehow things are better under his Government in London, I simply repeat to him a sign I saw, which touched me, in Tredegar on Sunday, and it's this: 'We have a statue to Aneurin Bevan; we'll never have a statue to Jeremy Hunt.'
Welsh: A gaf i yn gyntaf dalu gair o deyrnged unwaith eto i ragflaenydd yr Aelod, y gwnes i groesi cleddyfau ag ef am saith mlynedd, rwy'n credu, yn y Siambr hon? Aeth yr amser yn gyflym iawn, rwy'n amau, ond a gaf i ddymuno'r gorau iddo ar gyfer y dyfodol hefyd, a chroesawu'r Aelod dros Preseli Sir Benfro yn ôl i'r swydd yr oedd ynddi yn ôl yn 2011 am gyfnod byr o amser? A gaf i ei sicrhau ein bod ni'n falch iawn o'r hanes sydd gennym ni o ran y GIG? Ni yw'r blaid a sefydlodd y GIG. Rydym ni'n gwario mwy y pen ar iechyd nag y mae Lloegr. Rydym ni'n gwario mwy ar iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol o lawer iawn nag y mae Lloegr. Ac os yw'n awgrymu i mi rywsut bod pethau'n well o dan ei Lywodraeth ef yn Llundain, hoffwn ailadrodd yn syml iddo arwydd a welais, a gafodd effaith arnaf i, yn Nhredegar ddydd Sul, a dyma fe: 'Mae gennym ni gerflun i Aneurin Bevan; ni fydd gennym ni fyth gerflun i Jeremy Hunt.'
English: Well, of course, here he goes again - the First Minister, wanting to talk about England. He doesn't want to talk about Wales. You are the First Minister of Wales. Now, of course, perhaps the outgoing First Minister doesn't actually want to talk about financing the NHS in Wales, but at least the incoming First Minister is starting to accept his party's mistakes of the past. Only last week, at the WLGA conference in Llandudno, the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Services made it clear that it was a mistake to cut the health budget in 2011, when he said that - and I quote: 'The cash flat budget settlement didn't work'. First Minister, do you agree with him?
Welsh: Wel, wrth gwrs, dyma ni eto - y Prif Weinidog, eisiau siarad am Loegr. Nid yw eisiau siarad am Gymru. Chi yw Prif Weinidog Cymru. Nawr, wrth gwrs, efallai nad yw'r Prif Weinidog sydd ar fin gadael eisiau siarad am ariannu'r GIG yng Nghymru, ond o leiaf mae'r Prif Weinidog newydd yn dechrau derbyn camgymeriadau ei blaid yn y gorffennol. Dim ond yr wythnos diwethaf, yng nghynhadledd CLlLC yn Llandudno, fe'i gwnaed yn eglur gan Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Iechyd a Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol ei fod yn gamgymeriad torri'r gyllideb iechyd yn 2011, pan ddywedodd - a dyfynnaf: Ni wnaeth y setliad cyllideb arian gwastad weithio. Prif Weinidog, a ydych chi'n cytuno ag ef?