English: I thank the Member for his thoughtful questions and comments. If I might start by actually saying how important I recognise the role of the Legislation, Justice and Constitution Committee is, and in fact, I think I'm taking one of your papers home, which is a critique of one of our legislative consent memoranda, so I want to think about that very, very carefully, but it is a very important function that the committee has in a Parliament without a second Chamber. Firstly, on 'Reforming our Union', it relates back a little bit, doesn't it, to a question that was raised earlier in terms of engagement with the UK Government, and that is, we had the first edition of 'Reforming our Union' to the UK Government basically brushed aside, and the second version, more recently, brushed aside. And that was really very, very disappointing, because the whole point to those papers was to actually stimulate a debate, was to engage, and it's very difficult when one party, almost ostrich-like, sticks its head in the sand and says it won't engage. Now, I will say in terms of on the more positive side, and this is a matter that we have discussed before, is with the inter-governmental agreement - there is some progress on that. The inter-governmental agreement is a mechanism for improving the mechanism of engagement between the Governments of the four nations, although it is not a resolution to what I think are the longer term constitutional issues, which really are also the recognition of, I think, sovereignty, and the fact that the sovereignty of the four nations should now become a constitutional inalienability; that is that it is now shared and should not be capable of being changed. You're right also in terms of the impact of legislation from the UK Government, and what impact that may have in terms of devolving responsibilities, just mentioning the subsidy Bill, the internal market Act, of course, and the way that is being used in terms of the manipulation of finance. We've had this debate many times before, and of course, as you know, we have a legal challenge to the internal market Act, which is being heard in January of next year. Can I perhaps just summarise in saying I think all the points you make are valid? I think in going ahead and considering the issues, looking at the issues that the commission will have to consider, it would be irresponsible of us not to be having this commission, and not to be engaging in this process in the light of all the challenges we know are ahead. It is not appropriate, I think, to predict what the outcome will be, because I think everybody who's going to be on the commission, including the co-chairs - the position has been very clear from early on, they are not representatives of any particular political position but are there for their skills, to carry out the functions of the commission to engage with the people of Wales.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am ei gwestiynau a'i sylwadau meddylgar. Os gallaf ddechrau drwy ddweud pa mor bwysig yr wyf i'n cydnabod yw rôl y Pwyllgor Deddfwriaeth, Cyfiawnder a Chyfansoddiad, ac mewn gwirionedd, rwy'n credu fy mod yn mynd ag un o'ch papurau adref, sy'n feirniadaeth o un o'n memoranda cydsyniad deddfwriaethol, felly rwyf am feddwl am hynny'n ofalus iawn, iawn, ond mae'n swyddogaeth bwysig iawn sydd gan y pwyllgor mewn Senedd heb ail Siambr. Yn gyntaf, o ran 'Diwygio ein Hundeb', mae'n ymwneud yn ôl ychydig, onid ydy, â chwestiwn a godwyd yn gynharach o ran ymgysylltu â Llywodraeth y DU, a hynny yw, cafodd rhifyn cyntaf 'Diwygio ein Hundeb' i Lywodraeth y DU, yn ei hanfod, ei ysgubo ymaith, a chafodd yr ail fersiwn, yn fwy diweddar, ei ysgubo ymaith. Ac roedd hynny'n siomedig iawn, iawn, oherwydd holl bwynt y papurau hynny oedd ysgogi dadl, oedd ymgysylltu, ac mae'n anodd iawn pan fydd un blaid, fel estrys, yn cuddio ei phen yn y tywod ac yn dweud na fydd yn ymgysylltu. Nawr, fe wnaf i ddweud o ran yr ochr fwy cadarnhaol, ac mae hwn yn fater yr ydym ni wedi'i drafod o'r blaen, gyda'r cytundeb rhynglywodraethol - mae rhywfaint o gynnydd ar hynny. Mae'r cytundeb rhynglywodraethol yn fecanwaith ar gyfer gwella'r mecanwaith ymgysylltu rhwng Llywodraethau'r pedair gwlad, er nad yw'n ddatrysiad i'r hyn sydd, yn fy marn i, yn faterion cyfansoddiadol tymor hirach, sydd hefyd yn gydnabyddiaeth, yn fy marn i, o sofraniaeth, a'r ffaith y dylai sofraniaeth y pedair gwlad ddod yn natur gyfansoddiadol ddiymwad erbyn hyn; hynny yw ei fod bellach yn cael ei rannu ac na ddylid gallu ei newid. Rydych chi'n iawn hefyd o ran effaith deddfwriaeth gan Lywodraeth y DU, a pha effaith a allai hynny ei gael o ran datganoli cyfrifoldebau, dim ond sôn am y Bil cymhorthdal, Deddf y farchnad fewnol, wrth gwrs, a'r ffordd mae hynny'n cael ei ddefnyddio o ran trin cyllid. Rydym wedi cael y ddadl hon droeon o'r blaen, ac wrth gwrs, fel y gwyddoch chi, mae gennym her gyfreithiol i Ddeddf y farchnad fewnol bellach, sy'n cael ei chlywed ym mis Ionawr y flwyddyn nesaf. A gaf i efallai grynhoi wrth ddweud fy mod yn credu bod yr holl bwyntiau rydych chi'n eu gwneud yn ddilys? Rwy'n credu wrth fwrw ymlaen ac ystyried y materion, gan edrych ar y materion y bydd yn rhaid i'r comisiwn eu hystyried, y byddai'n anghyfrifol i ni beidio â bod â'r comisiwn hwn, a pheidio â bod yn rhan o'r broses hon yng ngoleuni'r holl heriau y gwyddom ni sydd o'n blaenau. Nid yw'n briodol, yn fy marn i, i ragdybio beth fydd y canlyniad, oherwydd rwy'n credu bod pawb sy'n mynd i fod ar y comisiwn, gan gynnwys y cyd-gadeiryddion - mae'r sefyllfa wedi bod yn glir iawn o'r dechrau, nid ydynt yn gynrychiolwyr unrhyw safbwynt wleidyddol benodol ond maen nhw yno ar gyfer eu sgiliau, i gyflawni swyddogaethau'r comisiwn i ymgysylltu â phobl Cymru.