English: I thank the Minister for his statement. I share Andrew R.T.'s disappointment that he's decided to make it from his office in Cathays Park; he's gone rather further from home to get there than he would to come to the Senedd. I do, though, appreciate we're slightly less delayed doing these regulations than some of the others that we've done before. It's our intention to vote against these regulations for the same reasons I gave last week. The Minister and Members will probably be pleased to hear that I'm not planning to repeat those reasons. May I, though, welcome Andrew R.T. Davies stating that the Conservatives will at least abstain on this set? He says it's the first time they've abstained - I think actually they did abstain on at least one set before. There were a lot of complaints from them about the cruel rule of 5 miles, even though I think they voted for the stay local law under which it was promulgated, but I think another set did attract their abstention at the time, so it's good to see they're now looking at these with a somewhat more critical eye than previously. Could I ask the Minister - ? As you know, Minister, I consider these regulations to be disproportionate and counter-productive, and I'd question how evidence based they are. I wonder, though, could I focus particularly on the three councils that have come in most recently? You set out some principles just now for the regulations we are looking at, and we're talking, at least in the case of Caerphilly, of a rapid increase in coronavirus regulations to justify the regs. The three latest councils that have come in though, it seems almost like you're filling in the gaps within the region. If you look at those councils individually, I just wonder if it can be justified on an individual basis. It strikes me they're even less justified than the other regulations. Take, for example, Torfaen, where one constituent has pointed out to me, at least on the basis of data that's publicly available to them as of yesterday, that we were seeing infections of no more than around seven a day in Torfaen, and generally it seemed you had been looking at a threshold of at least 20 per 100,000 before you considered restrictions, and that's the assessment you were putting on abroad as well. Why have you imposed such stringent regulations and lockdown requirements in Torfaen when the incidence of coronavirus seemed to be significantly below that?
Welsh: Diolch i'r Gweinidog am ei ddatganiad. Rwy'n rhannu siom Andrew R.T. ei fod wedi penderfynu mentro i'w swyddfa ym Mharc Cathays; mae wedi mynd ychydig ymhellach o'i gartref i gyrraedd yno nag y byddai i ddod i'r Senedd. Er hynny, rwy'n gwerthfawrogi ein bod ychydig yn llai ar ei hol hi wrth wneud y rheoliadau hyn na rhai o'r lleill yr ydym ni wedi'u gwneud o'r blaen. Ein bwriad ni yw pleidleisio yn erbyn y rheoliadau hyn am yr un rhesymau a roddais yr wythnos diwethaf. Mae'n debyg y bydd y Gweinidog a'r Aelodau'n falch o glywed nad wyf yn bwriadu ailadrodd y rhesymau hynny. Fodd bynnag, a gaf i groesawu datganiad Andrew R.T. Davies y bydd y Ceidwadwyr o leiaf yn ymatal ar y gyfres hon? Mae'n dweud mai dyma'r tro cyntaf iddyn nhw ymatal - rwy'n credu eu bod wedi ymatal ar o leiaf un gyfres o'r blaen. Cafwyd llawer o gwynion ganddyn nhw am y rheol greulon 5 milltir, er fy mod yn credu eu bod wedi pleidleisio dros y gyfraith aros yn lleol a oedd yn gyfrwng i hyrwyddo hynny, ond rwy'n credu iddyn nhw ymatal ar gyfres arall ar y pryd, felly mae'n dda gweld eu bod bellach yn edrych ar y rhain gyda llygad ychydig yn fwy beirniadol nag o'r blaen. A gaf i ofyn i'r Gweinidog - ? Fel y gwyddoch chi, Gweinidog, credaf fod y rheoliadau hyn yn anghymesur ac yn wrthgynhyrchiol, a byddwn yn cwestiynu i ba raddau y maen nhw'n seiliedig ar dystiolaeth. Tybed, serch hynny, a gaf i ganolbwyntio'n benodol ar y tri chyngor a gynhwyswyd yn fwyaf diweddar? Fe wnaethoch chi nodi rhai egwyddorion gynnau fach ar gyfer y rheoliadau dan sylw, ac rydym yn sôn, o leiaf yn achos Caerffili, am gynnydd cyflym mewn rheoliadau ynglŷn â'r coronafeirws i gyfiawnhau'r rheoliadau. Ond gyda'r tri chyngor diweddaraf a gynhwyswyd, mae'n ymddangos bron fel eich bod yn llenwi'r bylchau yn y rhanbarth. Os edrychwch chi ar y cynghorau hynny'n unigol, tybed a ellir cyfiawnhau hynny ar sail unigol. Mae'n fy nharo i fod hyd yn oed llai o alw amdanyn nhw ac am y rheoliadau eraill. Ystyriwch, er enghraifft, Torfaen, lle mae un etholwr wedi dweud wrthyf, o leiaf ar sail data cyhoeddus sydd ar gael iddynt o ddoe ymlaen, ein bod yn gweld dim mwy na thua saith y dydd yn cael eu heintio yn Nhorfaen, ac yn gyffredinol ymddengys y buoch yn edrych ar drothwy o 20 o bob 100,000 o leiaf cyn i chi ystyried cyfyngiadau, a dyna oedd y sail i'ch asesiad yn ymwneud â thramor hefyd. Pam yr ydych chi wedi gosod rheoliadau a gofynion cyfyngiadau symud mor llym yn Nhorfaen pan ymddengys hi fod nifer yr achosion o'r coronafeirws yn sylweddol is na hynny?