English: Well, I thank the Member for that supplementary question. He'll recall, I think, the speech that the First Minister made to the Institute for Government a few weeks ago, where he said that devolution, effectively, wasn't simply a question of what happens in Wales, but it's also a question of what happens in Westminster, and it's incumbent on Westminster to look at how Westminster and Whitehall operate in a different way in order to give full support to the devolution settlement. There are some parts of that speech that I think we can welcome. The Prime Minister talks about the UK resting on and being defined by the support of its people, in that sense of being a voluntary association of nations, and we welcome the recognition that devolution is now a stable and permanent part of the UK's constitution, as the speech indicated. I think, if Westminster and Whitehall are serious about addressing how they re-evaluate how they work to support devolution, that will only be a good thing, but I do echo the Member's response in relation to the fact that, if you're going to give a speech that is about the future of the union and the future of devolution within it, then the least you can do is have a conversation with the devolved administrations in advance of that so that, as he describes it, that sense of joint venture of the constitutional settlement is retained and preserved. But there's also, frankly, a very practical point to this: we have been pressing here for progress on the inter-governmental review for the last 15 months, and we have very little to show for it so far. He will have seen the announcement made by David Lidington last week and the response of the Welsh and Scottish Governments to that. Actually, pressing forward with that progress would have been a very good way of demonstrating commitment to the devolution settlement here in the UK, and to launch another review without acknowledging that, I think, was unfortunate. And I think had the Prime Minister sought the advice of the devolved administrations, we could have had a constructive discussion about the terms of reference and about how they could be better constructed to meet some of the significant challenges that we face in dealing with the UK Government. We note the emphasis in particular on the importance in the review of the territorial offices, and I think the First Minister was clear in his speech back in May that there is now an opportunity and a need, in fact, for the role of the Wales and Scotland offices in particular to be radically rethought in this post-Brexit world.
Welsh: Wel, diolch i'r Aelod am ei gwestiwn atodol. Credaf y bydd yn cofio'r araith a wnaeth Prif Weinidog Cymru i'r Institute for Government ychydig wythnosau yn ôl, lle dywedodd nad mater o beth sy'n digwydd yng Nghymru yn unig yw datganoli, ond ei fod hefyd yn gwestiwn ynghylch yr hyn sy'n digwydd yn San Steffan, ac mae'n ddyletswydd ar San Steffan i edrych ar sut y gall San Steffan a Whitehall weithredu mewn ffordd wahanol er mwyn rhoi cefnogaeth lawn i'r setliad datganoli. Credaf y gallwn groesawu rhai rhannau o'r araith honno. Dywed Prif Weinidog y DU fod y DU yn dibynnu ar, ac yn cael ei diffinio gan gefnogaeth ei phobl, yn yr ystyr o fod yn gymdeithas wirfoddol o wledydd, ac rydym yn croesawu'r gydnabyddiaeth fod datganoli bellach yn rhan sefydlog a pharhaol o gyfansoddiad y DU, fel y nododd yr araith. Os yw San Steffan a Whitehall o ddifrif ynglŷn â mynd i'r afael â sut y maent yn ailwerthuso'r ffordd y maent yn gweithio i gefnogi datganoli, credaf y bydd hynny'n beth da, ond os ydych am roi araith am ddyfodol yr undeb a dyfodol datganoli fel rhan o hynny, rwy'n ategu ymateb yr Aelod mai'r peth lleiaf y gallwch ei wneud yw cael sgwrs gyda'r gweinyddiaethau datganoledig cyn hynny er mwyn cadw a gwarchod, fel y dywed, yr ymdeimlad hwnnw o gyd-fenter y setliad cyfansoddiadol. Ond a dweud y gwir, mae pwynt ymarferol iawn i hyn: rydym wedi bod yn galw yma am gynnydd ar yr adolygiad rhynglywodraethol dros y 15 mis diwethaf, ac ychydig iawn sydd gennym i'w ddangos mewn perthynas â hynny hyd yn hyn. Bydd wedi gweld y cyhoeddiad a wnaed gan David Lidington yr wythnos diwethaf ac ymateb Llywodraethau Cymru a'r Alban i hynny. Mewn gwirionedd, byddai bwrw ymlaen â'r cynnydd hwnnw wedi bod yn ffordd dda iawn o ddangos ymrwymiad i'r setliad datganoli yma yn y DU, ac roedd lansio adolygiad arall heb gydnabod hynny yn anffodus yn fy marn i. A phe bai'r Prif Weinidog wedi ceisio cyngor y gweinyddiaethau datganoledig, credaf y gallem fod wedi cael trafodaeth adeiladol ynglŷn â'r cylch gorchwyl ac ynglŷn â sut y gellid ei lunio'n well i fynd i'r afael â rhai o'r heriau sylweddol sy'n ein hwynebu wrth ymdrin â Llywodraeth y DU. Nodwn yn arbennig y pwyslais ar bwysigrwydd y swyddfeydd tiriogaethol yn yr adolygiad, a chredaf fod Prif Weinidog Cymru wedi dweud yn glir yn ei araith yn ôl ym mis Mai fod cyfle ac angen bellach, mewn gwirionedd, i ailystyried rôl swyddfeydd Cymru a'r Alban yn radical yn y byd ôl-Brexit hwn.