English: I would like to, obviously, associate myself with the comments regarding the loss of jobs and the effect on families and just ask you, Cabinet Secretary, whether the scale of loss here, though it's, relatively speaking - you know, in a national sense, it's not huge, but, of course, in a very local sense, it's impactful, and it's particularly impactful as regards the relationship with the energy industry, the Haven Waterway enterprise zone, and everyone who's interested in developing around Milford Haven itself. So, can you confirm that this is of a nature that the Government will be doing more than simply, quite rightly, bringing together the day that you've announced, and possibly even triggering a ReAct kind of approach here, because, in my mind, it's of that kind of size? Could you say just a little more about the due diligence that the Government undertakes when it decides to invest in a company like this, or, rather, give a grant to a company like this? As has already been pointed out, the decision was taken after it lost its main customer with the closure of Murco. What, therefore - ? Are you only reliant on the published accounts of a company? Surely, you talk to potential creditors like the local authority, like HMRC, to try and get a sense of what the company's future looks like, and I'd like to understand that a little more, as to why the decision was made. The final question is the capital investment. This was part of a £1.8 million manufacturing investment, as I understand it. What was the nature of that capital investment, and does the Welsh Government have any clawback if that capital investment is either sold on or now utilised by a new company for economic purposes?
Welsh: Hoffwn, yn amlwg, fy nghysylltu fy hun â'r sylwadau ynghylch colli swyddi a'r effaith ar deuluoedd a dim ond gofyn ichi, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, pa un a oedd maint y golled hon, er nad oedd, a siarad yn gymharol - wyddoch chi, mewn ystyr genedlaethol, yn enfawr, ond, wrth gwrs, mewn ystyr leol iawn, mae'n drawiadol, ac mae'n arbennig o drawiadol o ran y berthynas â'r diwydiant ynni, ardal fenter Dyfrffordd Aberdaugleddau, a phawb sydd â diddordeb mewn datblygu o amgylch Aberdaugleddau ei hun. Felly, a allwch chi gadarnhau bod natur hyn yn golygu y bydd y Llywodraeth yn gwneud mwy na dim ond, yn gwbl briodol, dwyn ynghyd y dydd yr ydych wedi'i gyhoeddi, ac o bosibl hyd yn oed sbarduno dull tebyg i ReAct yma, oherwydd, yn fy meddwl i, mae tua'r maint hwnnw? A allwch chi ddweud ychydig bach mwy am y diwydrwydd dyladwy y mae'r Llywodraeth yn ei wneud wrth benderfynu buddsoddi mewn cwmni fel hwn, neu, yn hytrach, rhoi grant i gwmni fel hwn? Fel sydd eisoes wedi'i nodi, gwnaethpwyd y penderfyniad ar ôl i'r cwmni golli ei brif gwsmer pan gaeodd Murco. Beth, felly - ? A ydych chi'n dibynnu'n llwyr ar gyfrifon cyhoeddedig cwmni? Does bosib nad ydych chi'n siarad â chredydwyr posibl fel yr awdurdod lleol, fel Cyllid a Thollau EM, i geisio cael ymdeimlad o sut ddyfodol sydd gan y cwmni, a hoffwn ddeall ychydig mwy am hynny, o ran pam y gwnaethpwyd y penderfyniad. Mae'r cwestiwn olaf yn ymwneud â'r buddsoddiad cyfalaf. Roedd hwn yn rhan o fuddsoddiad gweithgynhyrchu gwerth £1.8 miliwn, yn ôl a ddeallaf. Beth oedd natur y buddsoddiad cyfalaf hwnnw, ac a oes gan Lywodraeth Cymru unrhyw ffordd o'i adfachu os yw'r buddsoddiad cyfalaf naill ai'n cael ei werthu ymlaen neu ei ddefnyddio nawr gan gwmni newydd at ddibenion economaidd?