techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, obviously, as the Member knows, I'm not in a position to comment on the individual concerns that he raises, and I'm sure he'll be raising those with the treating health board. It's a matter of fact, not opinion, that we're restarting NHS services and that urgent cancer care has always been available. However, there will have been times when operational matters, such as people isolating if they have a positive test, or their context will have affected individual parts of our service. What we're looking to do is to progressively treat more people and, as I say, to give people the confidence to come into the service. When it comes to excess deaths from cancer, but other conditions too, as I have said, again, I am genuinely concerned, and have been for months, as you'll know from the Record, that the impact on treatment means we'll have different outcomes and harm caused in different ways. It's part of what has made our task, as a Government and a health service that work for the people of Wales, so incredibly difficult, but I am confident we're doing the right thing in restarting activity and more lives will be saved as a result.
Welsh: Wel, yn amlwg, fel y gŵyr yr Aelod, nid wyf mewn sefyllfa i wneud sylwadau ar y pryderon unigol y mae'n eu nodi, ac rwy'n siŵr y bydd yn codi'r rheini gyda'r bwrdd iechyd sy'n darparu'r driniaeth. Mater o ffaith, nid barn, yw ein bod yn ailgychwyn gwasanaethau'r GIG a bod gofal canser brys wedi bod ar gael ers y cychwyn. Fodd bynnag, bydd yna adegau pan fydd materion gweithredol, megis pobl yn ynysu os ydynt wedi cael prawf positif, neu eu cyd-destun wedi effeithio ar rannau unigol o'n gwasanaeth. Rydym yn ceisio trin mwy o bobl yn gynyddol a rhoi hyder, fel rwy'n dweud, i bobl ddod i mewn i'r gwasanaeth. O ran marwolaethau ychwanegol o ganser, a chyflyrau eraill hefyd, fel y dywedais, unwaith eto, rwy'n wirioneddol bryderus, ac wedi bod ers misoedd, fel y gwyddoch o'r Cofnod, fod yr effaith ar driniaethau'n golygu y byddwn yn cael gwahanol ganlyniadau a niwed wedi'i achosi mewn gwahanol ffyrdd. Mae'n rhan o'r hyn sydd wedi gwneud ein tasg, fel Llywodraeth a gwasanaeth iechyd sy'n gweithio ar gyfer pobl Cymru, mor anhygoel o anodd, ond rwy'n hyderus ein bod yn gwneud y peth iawn wrth ailgychwyn gweithgaredd a bydd mwy o fywydau'n cael eu hachub o ganlyniad i hynny.
English: Questions now by party spokespeople. The spokesperson for the Conservative group - Janet Finch-Saunders.
Welsh: Cwestiynau yn awr gan lefarwyr y pleidiau. Llefarydd y grŵp Ceidwadol - Janet Finch-Saunders.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. Minister, 1,097 patients or individuals were discharged to care homes without a COVID-19 test in March and April. On Sunday, you mentioned that there is no evidence to suggest this caused any increases in COVID cases or deaths. In relation to mortality rates and causes, there was a promise to issue an interim report before recess. Will this be looking very closely at the impact of discharges on care homes? What do you say to care home owners who have provided oral evidence such as, 'The people who were discharged from hospital were not tested because they only displayed the symptoms once they got to us'? I have established that 188 homes in north Wales had patients discharged to them in the nine weeks from 16 March. Will your interim report cross reference discharge data with that of care homes that have recorded cases of COVID-19?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Weinidog, rhyddhawyd 1,097 o gleifion neu unigolion i gartrefi gofal heb brawf COVID-19 ym mis Mawrth a mis Ebrill. Ddydd Sul, fe sonioch chi nad oes tystiolaeth i awgrymu bod hyn wedi achosi unrhyw gynnydd yn nifer yr achosion neu farwolaethau o COVID. Mewn perthynas â chyfraddau marwolaeth ac achosion, roedd addewid i gyhoeddi adroddiad interim cyn y toriad. A fydd hwn yn edrych yn agos iawn ar effaith rhyddhau cleifion ar gartrefi gofal? Beth a ddywedwch wrth berchnogion cartrefi gofal sydd wedi darparu tystiolaeth lafar yn dweud er enghraifft, 'Ni chynhaliwyd profion ar y bobl a ryddhawyd o'r ysbyty am mai ar ôl iddynt ein cyrraedd y gwelwyd bod ganddynt symptomau?' Rwyf wedi sefydlu bod 188 o gartrefi yng ngogledd Cymru wedi derbyn cleifion o'r ysbyty yn ystod y naw wythnos ar ôl 16 Mawrth. A fydd eich adroddiad interim yn trawsgyfeirio data rhyddhau cleifion â data cartrefi gofal sydd wedi cofnodi achosion o COVID-19?
English: Thank you, Minister. Now, it's not just me who is concerned about care homes. The older people's commissioner's report, 'Care Home Voices', has requested step-down facilities to support safe discharges from hospital, and found that the limited availability of testing was a cause of significant worry. From 15 June, all care home staff were to be offered a weekly test for a four-week period. Will you extend this? In the latest week, 49.6 per cent of test results authorised in NHS Wales laboratories were returned within a day, and 74.1 per cent within two days. Why are the percentages getting smaller, and what specific measures will you take to reverse the trend?
Welsh: Diolch, Weinidog. Nawr, nid fi'n unig sy'n pryderu am gartrefi gofal. Mae adroddiad y comisiynydd pobl hŷn, 'Lleisiau Cartrefi Gofal', wedi gofyn am gyfleusterau cam-i-lawr i sicrhau y caiff cleifion eu rhyddhau'n ddiogel o'r ysbyty, a chanfu fod argaeledd cyfyngedig profion yn achos pryder sylweddol. O 15 Mehefin, roedd holl staff cartrefi gofal i gael cynnig prawf wythnosol am gyfnod o bedair wythnos. A wnewch chi ymestyn hyn? Yn ystod yr wythnos ddiweddaraf, cafodd 49.6 y cant o ganlyniadau profion a awdurdodwyd yn labordai GIG Cymru eu dychwelyd o fewn diwrnod, a 74.1 y cant o fewn dau ddiwrnod. Pam y mae'r canrannau'n gostwng, a pha fesurau penodol y byddwch chi'n eu rhoi ar waith i wyrdroi'r duedd?
English: I'll deal with the last point first. When it comes to improving testing turnaround, it's a real concern of myself and the Government and the health service. We have an improvement programme in place identifying areas to make a practical difference to the operational delivery to speed up testing turnaround times. There's already action in place in terms of courier services and more action taking place, together with colleagues in Public Health Wales, to improve the efficiency within our labs. When it comes to the broader approach, we will be publishing a revised testing strategy. I'm expecting some advice for me to consider and make a decision upon, and I expect to have that testing strategy published before the end of next week. So, we'll continue to learn from evidence and from experience as we look to revise our approach for the future, with the sole focus of saving lives and helping Wales to safely come out of lockdown.
Welsh: Fe wnaf ymdrin â'r pwynt olaf yn gyntaf. O ran gwella amser dychwelyd canlyniadau profion, mae'n bryder gwirioneddol i mi a'r Llywodraeth a'r gwasanaeth iechyd. Mae gennym raglen wella ar waith sy'n nodi meysydd ar gyfer gwneud gwahaniaeth ymarferol i'r ddarpariaeth weithredol er mwyn cyflymu amseroedd dychwelyd canlyniadau. Mae gwaith eisoes ar y gweill mewn perthynas â gwasanaethau cludo a mwy o weithredu'n digwydd, gyda chydweithwyr yn Iechyd Cyhoeddus Cymru, i wella effeithlonrwydd yn ein labordai. O ran y dull ehangach o weithredu, byddwn yn cyhoeddi strategaeth brofi ddiwygiedig. Rwy'n disgwyl cyngor i mi ei ystyried a gwneud penderfyniad yn ei gylch, ac rwy'n disgwyl i'r strategaeth brofi honno gael ei chyhoeddi cyn diwedd yr wythnos nesaf. Felly, byddwn yn parhau i ddysgu o dystiolaeth ac o brofiad wrth inni geisio adolygu ein dull o weithredu ar gyfer y dyfodol, gyda'r unig ffocws ar achub bywydau a helpu Cymru i lacio'r cyfyngiadau symud yn ddiogel.
English: Thank you again. Now, from many people I've spoken to in the social care sector and care home staff, they feel badly let down by the First Minister. Do you agree with me that he should apologise for failing to make the £500 payment announcement without contacting Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs or clarifying whether the bonus would affect any benefits before making the announcement, or is this down to you? Should he urgently provide a date for when the bonus will be paid, stop dithering, and use Welsh Government's powers and funding to gross up the payment so to ensure that social care workers benefit by at least this £500? I would also like to see him ensure that community hospice staff are eligible for the bonus. Do you agree with those sentiments, health Minister?
Welsh: Diolch i chi unwaith eto. Nawr, mae llawer o bobl y siaradais â hwy yn y sector gofal cymdeithasol a staff cartrefi gofal yn teimlo eu bod wedi cael cam gan y Prif Weinidog. A ydych yn cytuno â mi y dylai ymddiheuro am fethu gwneud y cyhoeddiad ynghylch y taliad o £500 heb gysylltu â Cyllid a Thollau Ei Mawrhydi neu egluro a fyddai'r bonws yn effeithio ar unrhyw fudd-daliadau cyn gwneud y cyhoeddiad, neu ai chi sy'n gyfrifol am hyn? A ddylai ddarparu dyddiad ar frys ar gyfer talu'r bonws, rhoi'r gorau i din-droi, a defnyddio pwerau a chyllid Llywodraeth Cymru i grosio'r taliad i fyny er mwyn sicrhau bod gweithwyr gofal cymdeithasol yn elwa o'r £500 hwn fan lleiaf? Hoffwn ei weld yn sicrhau hefyd fod staff hosbisau cymunedol yn gymwys i gael y bonws. A ydych chi'n cytuno â'r pethau hyn, Weinidog iechyd?
English: Well, as you'll recall from listening to the First Minister earlier, we continue to talk with the UK Government to try to make sure that social care workers in Wales receive the full £500. I do not think that it would be a good day for HMRC if they picked the pocket of poorly paid workers in the social care sector, and we will look to exhaust all of the avenues of discussion before making any further choice, but it is a matter within the hands of the UK Government. This payment should not be a windfall for the UK Treasury.
Welsh: Wel, fel y cofiwch o wrando ar y Prif Weinidog yn gynharach, rydym yn parhau i siarad gyda Llywodraeth y DU i geisio sicrhau bod gweithwyr gofal cymdeithasol yng Nghymru yn cael y £500 llawn. Ni chredaf y byddai'n ddiwrnod da i CThEM pe baent yn mynd ag arian o bocedi gweithwyr sy'n cael cyflog gwael yn y sector gofal cymdeithasol, a byddwn yn ceisio dihysbyddu pob llwybr trafod cyn gwneud unrhyw ddewis pellach, ond mae'n fater sydd yn nwylo Llywodraeth y DU. Ni ddylai'r taliad hwn fod yn ffynhonnell o arian annisgwyl i Drysorlys y DU.
English: Thank you very much. First of all, may I welcome the First Minister's statement that he's considering stronger guidance on the use of face coverings? We are focused on making face coverings compulsory in certain indoor arenas. The evidence on the benefit of that, and on the likelihood that the virus is spreading through the air, is becoming more prevalent. So, I'm looking forward to a robust statement at an early stage on that. In turning to the health committee's report, the report was published today and it raised some fundamental questions on the Welsh Government's response to the pandemic. And one of those questions is on the pace of protecting the care sector. Now, I've seen some figures that seem to suggest how many antibody tests have been carried out in various sectors in Wales: 13,000 health workers have been tested; 9,000 workers in educational hubs have been tested; but only 75 people working in the care sector. Now, does the Minister understand that that reinforces this perception that this sector wasn't prioritised properly at an early stage during this pandemic and it's still not being prioritised now?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Yn gyntaf, gaf i groesawu datganiad y Gweinidog ei fod o'n ystyried canllawiau cryfach ar ddefnydd gorchuddion wyneb? Dwi'n galw eto yr wythnos yma am wneud gorchuddion yn orfodol mewn rhai llefydd dan do. Mae'r dystiolaeth, dwi'n meddwl, o les hynny yn cryfhau, felly, hefyd y dystiolaeth ar y tebygrwydd y bydd y feirws yn lledaenu drwy'r awyr. Felly, dwi'n edrych ymlaen at ddatganiad cadarn a buan ar hynny. Ond am droi at adroddiad pwyllgor iechyd a gofal y Senedd ydw i, a'r pwyllgor yn cyhoeddi adroddiad heddiw sydd yn codi llawer o gwestiynau sylfaenol am ymateb Llywodraeth Cymru i'r pandemig. Un o'r rheini ydy'r arafwch o ran camau gweithredu i warchod y sector gofal. Rŵan, dwi wedi gweld ffigurau sydd yn dangos faint o brofion antibody sydd wedi cael eu gwneud mewn gwahanol sectorau: 13,000 o weithwyr iechyd wedi'u profi; 9,000 o weithwyr mewn hubs addysg wedi cael eu profi; a dim ond 75 o bobl sydd yn gweithio yn y sector gofal. Ydy'r Gweinidog yn gallu gweld bod hynny'n atgyfnerthu'r teimlad bod y sector yma wedi methu â chael ei blaenoriaethu'n gynnar yn y pandemig yma a'i bod hi'n dal i fethu â chael ei blaenoriaethu rŵan?
English: I don't think it is a factually accurate conclusion to reach that the Government and our partners did not prioritise the social care sector in terms of the amount of support we've provided, both in extra cash support on an emergency basis, and the further amount of support that we're looking to find at a hard-pushed time as well. We've also provided significant amounts of personal protective equipment free to the social care sector at a time when their normal supply lines had collapsed. So, there's been a significant amount of support, including staffing as well. When it comes to the antibody tests, I don't think that the figures are accurate. I'll happily look at the figures again and come back, not just to the Member, but more generally, because social care workers, health workers and education workers are three of the priority groups for the antibody test. And the antibody test is actually to help us understand the prevalence of coronavirus around the country at this point. The evidence on how long term an antibody response is, or indeed, the usefulness in terms of people's transmissability to other people, or indeed to help people recover or be immune from a further incidence of coronavirus is not clear, but it does certainly help us to understand how far coronavirus has spread. We'll continue to use the tests available to us to do so, and you can expect to see more of that in the testing strategy that I have already referred to.
Welsh: Nid wyf yn credu ei fod yn gasgliad sy'n ffeithiol gywir i'w gyrraedd nad oedd y Llywodraeth a'n partneriaid yn rhoi blaenoriaeth i'r sector gofal cymdeithasol o ran faint o gymorth a ddarparwyd gennym, ar ffurf cymorth ariannol ychwanegol ar sail argyfwng, a'r cymorth ychwanegol rydym yn gobeithio dod o hyd iddo ar adeg anodd iawn hefyd. Rydym hefyd wedi darparu llawer iawn o gyfarpar diogelu personol am ddim i'r sector gofal cymdeithasol ar adeg pan oedd eu llinellau cyflenwi arferol wedi chwalu. Felly, mae cryn dipyn o gymorth wedi bod, gan gynnwys staffio yn ogystal. O ran y profion gwrthgyrff, nid wyf yn credu bod y ffigurau'n gywir. Byddaf yn falch o edrych ar y ffigurau eto a dod yn ôl, nid yn unig at yr Aelod, ond yn fwy cyffredinol, oherwydd mae gweithwyr gofal cymdeithasol, gweithwyr iechyd a gweithwyr addysg yn dri o'r grwpiau blaenoriaeth ar gyfer y prawf gwrthgyrff. A phwrpas y prawf gwrthgyrff mewn gwirionedd yw ein helpu i ddeall lefel y coronafeirws o gwmpas y wlad ar yr adeg hon. Nid yw'r dystiolaeth yn gir o ran pa mor hirdymor yw ymateb gwrthgyrff, neu'n wir, pa mor ddefnyddiol yw'r prawf o ran trosglwyddiad pobl i bobl eraill, neu'n wir i helpu pobl i wella neu fod ag imiwnedd rhag cael eu heintio eto gan y coronafeirws, ond mae'n sicr yn ein helpu i ddeall pa mor bell y mae coronafeirws wedi lledaenu. Byddwn yn parhau i ddefnyddio'r profion sydd ar gael inni i wneud hynny, a gallwch ddisgwyl gweld mwy o hynny yn y strategaeth brofi y cyfeiriais ati eisoes.
English: I want to turn to data, now, if I may. We all welcomed the figures earlier this week, when there was another day when not a single COVID-19 death was recorded in Wales; we want more days like that day, of course. The figures also show that only seven new cases of COVID-19 were recorded on the Public Health Wales dashboard - again, that's good news. But we have to be careful with these figures, I think, because the figures could be inaccurate, because I do understand that as many as 35 to 40 per cent of new positive cases may not be being announced in these ways if they are tested in laboratories that aren't part of the NHS. Will the Minister provide an assurance that everything will be done to ensure that every positive result is recorded and demonstrated on up-to-date dashboards and also that we can see in what areas these positive cases are emerging? Also, please can we ensure that GPs are informed when their patients prove positive, because, from speaking to GPs in Anglesey, they receive no information at all?
Welsh: Dwi am droi at ddata rŵan, os caf i. Roeddem ni i gyd yn croesawu'r ffigurau yn gynharach yr wythnos yma o ddiwrnod arall lle na chofnodwyd yr un farwolaeth COVID-19 yng Nghymru; rydym ni eisiau mwy o ddyddiau felly. Y ffigurau hefyd yn dangos mai dim ond saith achos newydd o COVID-19 a gafodd eu cofnodi ar dashboard Iechyd Cyhoeddus Cymru - eto, newyddion da. Ond mae eisiau bod yn ofalus efo'r ffigurau yma, dwi'n meddwl, achos mi allai'r ffigurau bod allan ohoni dipyn, oherwydd dwi'n deall y gallai cymaint â 35 i 40 y cant o achosion newydd positif sydd ddim yn cael eu cyhoeddi yn y ffordd yma os ydyn nhw'n cael eu profi mewn labordai sydd ddim yn rhan o'r NHS. A wnaiff y Gweinidog roi sicrwydd y bydd popeth yn cael ei wneud i sicrhau bod pob canlyniad positif yn cael eu dangos ar dashboard data cyfredol a hefyd ein bod ni'n gallu gweld ym mha ardaloedd mae'r achosion positif hynny? Hefyd, plîs allwn ni sicrhau bod meddygon teulu yn cael gwybod pan fo'u cleifion nhw'n profi'n bositif, achos, o siarad efo meddygon teulu yn Ynys Môn, dydyn nhw ddim yn cael dim gwybodaeth o gwbl?
English: Yes, quite right. I think you confirmed what I was saying in your response there on the dashboard data. You say seven positive tests in Wales, three in non-NHS labs; the dashboard I saw only had those seven. So, that shows that all the data has to be presented in an up-to-date way, wherever the tests are processed. I'm going to turn, finally, to another area where we need faster test results, and that's cancer diagnosis. The COVID crisis has led to a number of very worrying predictions about excess deaths from cancer that are likely to occur this year as a result of screening programmes being cancelled, people being too afraid to visit the NHS, and, of course, treatment being postponed. So, it's more vital than ever that we get fast test results where cancer is suspected. So, will you therefore adopt a cancer rescue plan that has more ambitious targets for testing and treatment than have previously been the case, because of the probability that the NHS will be identifying cancers at a later stage?
Welsh: Yn hollol. Rwy'n credu eich bod wedi cadarnhau'r hyn roeddwn yn ei ddweud yn eich ymateb yno ar ddata'r dangosfwrdd. Dywedwch fod saith prawf positif yng Nghymru, tri mewn labordai nad ydynt yn rhai'r GIG; dim ond y saith a ddangosai'r dangosfwrdd a welais i. Felly, mae hynny'n dangos bod yn rhaid i'r holl ddata gael ei gyflwyno mewn ffordd gyfredol, lle bynnag y caiff y profion eu prosesu. Rwy'n mynd i droi, yn olaf, at faes arall lle mae angen canlyniadau profion cyflymach, sef diagnosis canser. Mae argyfwng COVID wedi arwain at nifer o ragfynegiadau pryderus iawn am y marwolaethau ychwanegol o ganser sy'n debygol o ddigwydd eleni o ganlyniad i ganslo rhaglenni sgrinio, pobl yn rhy ofnus i ymweld â'r GIG, ac wrth gwrs, gohirio triniaethau. Felly, mae'n fwy hanfodol nag erioed ein bod yn cael canlyniadau prawf cyflym mewn achosion lle ceir amheuaeth o ganser. Felly, a wnewch chi fabwysiadu cynllun achub canser sydd â thargedau mwy uchelgeisiol ar gyfer profi a rhoi triniaeth nag a fu yn y gorffennol, oherwydd y tebygolrwydd y bydd y GIG yn canfod canserau'n hwyrach?
English: [ Inaudible.] - cancer information, and I can give the Member the assurance that the decision I made to both introduce and trial the single cancer pathway is going to be the path forward when we restart new performance measures in the future, as we progressively restart more forms of NHS activity. I have already decided that we will not be reporting the old measures. I think it would be unhelpful and confusing to report the old measures under the urgent and non-urgent pathway, and we will only be reporting as the single cancer pathway, which, as the Member knows, has been supported by both clinicians and the third sector cancer charities. And that, I think, will give us a much more accurate indication of what is really happening in terms of cancer treatment and waits. So, I expect that to provide the level of clarity and transparency in how quickly we're getting through the number being referred in to our cancer services, as we deal with needing to restart services. Because, as the Member will know, endoscopy services were suspended during the pandemic; they're now restarting. But that does give us significant challenges in a range of our work, not just in cancer, but we'll continue to be open and transparent about what we're doing and what that means for people here in Wales.
Welsh: [ Anghlywadwy.] - gwybodaeth am ganser, a gallaf sicrhau'r Aelod mai'r penderfyniad a wneuthum i gyflwyno a threialu'r llwybr canser sengl fydd y ffordd ymlaen pan fyddwn yn ailgychwyn mesurau perfformiad newydd yn y dyfodol, wrth inni fynd ati'n gynyddol i ailgychwyn rhagor o fathau o weithgarwch y GIG. Rwyf eisoes wedi penderfynu na fyddwn yn adrodd ar yr hen fesurau. Nid wyf yn credu y byddai'n fuddiol nac yn eglur i adrodd ar yr hen fesurau o dan y llwybr brys a'r llwybr nad yw'n llwybr brys, a dim ond ar y llwybr canser sengl y byddwn yn adrodd, llwybr sydd, fel y gŵyr yr Aelod, wedi cael ei gefnogi gan glinigwyr ac elusennau canser y trydydd sector. A bydd hynny, rwy'n meddwl, yn rhoi arwydd llawer cywirach inni o'r hyn sy'n digwydd mewn gwirionedd o ran trin canser ac amseroedd aros. Felly, rwy'n disgwyl i hwnnw ddarparu'r lefel o eglurder a thryloywder o ran pa mor gyflym y down drwy'r nifer sy'n cael eu hatgyfeirio at ein gwasanaethau canser, wrth inni ymateb i'r angen i ailgychwyn gwasanaethau. Oherwydd, fel y bydd yr Aelod yn gwybod, ataliwyd gwasanaethau endosgopi yn ystod y pandemig; maent yn ailgychwyn yn awr. Ond mae hynny'n rhoi heriau sylweddol i ni mewn sawl agwedd ar ein gwaith, nid yn unig canser, ond byddwn yn parhau i fod yn agored ac yn dryloyw ynglŷn â'r hyn rydym yn ei wneud a beth y mae hynny'n ei olygu i bobl yma yng Nghymru.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. Minister, thanks to the hard work and dedication of our health and care staff, as well as the enormous sacrifices by the Welsh public, we are over the worst of the coronavirus outbreak for now. As the chief medical officer rightly points out, we could be facing a renewed threat from COVID-19 come the autumn. What plans does the Welsh Government have in place to ensure that the NHS in Wales can deliver routine services at the same time as dealing with COVID-19? Or do your plans foresee a further suspension of everyday NHS services? Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Weinidog, diolch i waith caled ac ymroddiad ein staff iechyd a gofal, yn ogystal â'r aberth enfawr gan y cyhoedd yng Nghymru, rydym dros y gwaethaf o'r argyfwng coronafeirws yn awr. Fel y mae'r prif swyddog meddygol yn dweud, a hynny'n gywir, gallem wynebu bygythiad o'r newydd gan COVID-19 erbyn yr hydref. Pa gynlluniau sydd gan Lywodraeth Cymru ar waith i sicrhau y gall y GIG yng Nghymru ddarparu gwasanaethau rheolaidd ar yr un pryd ag ymdrin â COVID-19? Neu a yw eich cynlluniau'n rhagweld y bydd gwasanaethau o ddydd i ddydd y GIG yn cael eu hatal ymhellach? Diolch.