techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Diolch, Ddirprwy Lywydd, and I'd like to thank the Minister for today's statement. The dramatic scenes we saw at Tylorstown and Wattstown back in 2020 have had a dramatic effect on some members of our communities in Rhondda. The Minister is right, our priority has to be that people living and working near coal tips feel safe, not just now but in the future. We need to know that everything that can be done to put right our coal tips is being done. The work carried out in Tylorstown to date has been exceptional. The same can be said about the landslide in Wattstown, and I'm glad to hear that further funding is being made available for the coal board to continue their inspections. I know that this will go a long way in providing peace of mind for members in those communities. In Rhondda, this has only been possible through partnership working between the Welsh Government, the Coal Authority and Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council. As the Minister has pointed out, the only party not pulling their weight is the Tory Westminster Government, who are clearly happy to sit on the profits made through the hard work of our forefathers to now decide that these coal tips aren't their responsibility. Mind you, shirking responsibility won't come as a surprise given the abysmal support made available by the same Government to support families through the cost-of-living crisis. I'd like to thank the Minister again for today's statement, and I'm sure he agrees with me, hoping that the Tories in Westminster eventually start to pull their weight on this issue.
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd, a hoffwn i ddiolch i'r Gweinidog am y datganiad heddiw. Mae'r golygfeydd trawiadol a welsom yn Nhylorstown a Wattstown yn ôl yn 2020 wedi cael effaith drawiadol ar rai o aelodau ein cymunedau yn y Rhondda. Mae'r Gweinidog yn iawn, mae'n rhaid i'n blaenoriaeth fod ar sicrhau bod y bobl sy'n byw ac yn gweithio ger tomenni glo yn teimlo'n ddiogel, nid yn unig yn awr ond yn y dyfodol. Mae angen i ni wybod bod popeth y gellir ei wneud i unioni ein tomenni glo yn cael ei wneud. Mae'r gwaith sydd wedi ei wneud yn Nhylorstown hyd yma wedi bod yn eithriadol. Gellir dweud yr un peth am y tirlithriad yn Wattstown, ac rwy'n falch o glywed bod rhagor o gyllid ar gael i'r bwrdd glo barhau â'u harolygiadau. Rwy'n gwybod y bydd hyn yn gwneud llawer i ddarparu tawelwch meddwl i aelodau yn y cymunedau hynny. Yn y Rhondda, dim ond drwy weithio mewn partneriaeth rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru, yr Awdurdod Glo a Chyngor Bwrdeistref Sirol Rhondda Cynon Taf y bu hyn yn bosibl. Fel y dywedodd y Gweinidog, yr unig blaid nad yw'n cyd-dynnu yw Llywodraeth Dorïaidd San Steffan, sy'n amlwg yn fodlon eistedd ar yr elw a wnaed drwy waith caled ein cyndadau i benderfynu'n awr nad eu cyfrifoldeb nhw yw'r tomenni glo hyn. Cofiwch chi, ni fydd anwybyddu cyfrifoldeb yn syndod o ystyried y gefnogaeth druenus sydd ar gael gan yr un Llywodraeth i gefnogi teuluoedd drwy'r argyfwng costau byw. Hoffwn ddiolch i'r Gweinidog eto am y datganiad heddiw, ac rwy'n siŵr ei fod yn cytuno â mi, gan obeithio y bydd y Torïaid yn San Steffan yn dechrau cyd-dynnu ar y mater hwn yn y pen draw.
English: Item 8 is next, and it's a statement by the Deputy Minister for Social Partnership: fair work - annual progress update. I call on the Deputy Minister, Hannah Blythyn.
Welsh: Eitem 8 nesaf - datganiad gan y Dirprwy Weinidog Partneriaeth Gymdeithasol: gwaith teg, y wybodaeth ddiweddaraf am gynnydd blynyddol. Galwaf ar y Dirprwy Weinidog, Hannah Blythyn.
English: Okay, only a couple of final sentences. I wonder why you haven't mentioned any progress for fair work for disabled people, why you haven't mentioned any progress to remove and reduce barriers that disabled people are presented with, and I wonder why you haven't mentioned any initiatives to help close the disability employment gap. With this in mind, can the Deputy Minister tell this Chamber what proposals this Government has to help disabled people access a fair working environment? Because as a disproportionately affected group, they should be a priority for this Government. Thank you.
Welsh: Iawn, dim ond ychydig o frawddegau olaf. Tybed pam nad ydych wedi sôn am unrhyw gynnydd ar gyfer gwaith teg i bobl anabl, pam nad ydych chi wedi sôn am unrhyw gynnydd i ddileu a lleihau'r rhwystrau y mae pobl anabl yn eu hwynebu, a tybed pam nad ydych chi wedi sôn am unrhyw fentrau i helpu i gau'r bwlch cyflogaeth i bobl anabl. Gyda hyn mewn golwg, a all y Dirprwy Weinidog ddweud wrth y Siambr hon pa gynigion sydd gan y Llywodraeth hon i helpu pobl anabl i gael mynediad i amgylchedd gwaith teg? Oherwydd fel grŵp sy'n cael ei effeithio'n anghymesur, dylen nhw fod yn flaenoriaeth i'r Llywodraeth hon. Diolch.
English: Thank you for your statement, Deputy Minister.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr ichi am eich datganiad, Dirprwy Weinidog.
English: I welcome the statement by the Minister on devolved public services, and can I join with others in welcoming the living wage in social care? But, will the Minister commit to no exploitative contracts and everyone to be paid at least the real living wage in all devolved Welsh public services? Will the Welsh Government use its procurement powers to exclude from Welsh Government-funded contracts companies paying less than the real living wage, or using exploitative contracts? Finally, will the Minister join me in condemning fire and rehire, and will companies that use that be banned from Welsh Government-funded contracts? And listening to what people have said about low pay, if low pay was important for investment and growth, explain to me Palo Alto, explain to me New York, explain to me Mannheim, explain to me Cambridge. It's the high-paid areas that are the ones who are getting the investment, not the low-paid ones.
Welsh: Rwy'n croesawu'r datganiad gan y Gweinidog ynghylch gwasanaethau cyhoeddus datganoledig, ac a gaf i ymuno ag eraill i groesawu'r cyflog byw ym maes gofal cymdeithasol? Ond, a wnaiff y Gweinidog ymrwymo i ddim contractau camfanteisiol a bod cyflog byw gwirioneddol yn cael ei dalu i bawb ym mhob gwasanaeth cyhoeddus datganoledig yng Nghymru? A wnaiff Llywodraeth Cymru ddefnyddio ei phwerau caffael i eithrio cwmnïau contractau y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn eu hariannu sy'n talu llai na'r cyflog byw gwirioneddol, neu'n ddefnyddio contractau camfanteisiol? Yn olaf, a wnaiff y Gweinidog ymuno â mi i gondemnio diswyddo ac ailgyflogi, ac a fydd cwmnïau sy'n defnyddio hynny'n cael eu gwahardd o gontractau sy'n cael eu hariannu gan Lywodraeth Cymru? A gan wrando ar yr hyn y mae pobl wedi'i ddweud am gyflog isel, os oedd cyflog isel yn bwysig ar gyfer buddsoddi a thwf, esboniwch i mi Palo Alto, esboniwch i mi Efrog Newydd, esboniwch i mi Mannheim, esboniwch i mi Caergrawnt. Yr ardaloedd â chyflogau uchel yw'r rhai sy'n cael y buddsoddiad, nid y rhai â chyflogau isel.
English: Sticking with P&O, step forward the company that actually employs people with different working conditions in the shipping industry; as far as I'm aware, they're all using offshore places to register their companies, and they're all paying really appalling wages, and the conditions that they house these people in are really quite dreadful. But there's very little that Welsh Government can do, not even collaborating with the UK Government. This is an international problem that has to be dealt with by the United Nations. Sticking with what we can do something about, you mentioned that one of the levers the Welsh Government has to support individuals and organisations is to upskill them, so they can access fair work. So, I wanted to look at the areas of the economy where we know there are recruitment and retention challenges. The Welsh Government is investing a large sum of money in extending the real living wage to social care and childcare, as well as obviously investing many millions in the optimised retrofit programme. How and who are you upskilling people who are under-represented in those sectors, whether they're ethnic minorities or more men in childcare, more women as insulation fitters in the construction industry?
Welsh: Gan gadw at P&O, dyma gwmni sydd, mewn gwirionedd, yn cyflogi pobl gyda gwahanol amodau gwaith yn y diwydiant llongau; hyd y gwn i, maen nhw i gyd yn defnyddio lleoedd alltraeth i gofrestru eu cwmnïau, ac maen nhw i gyd yn talu cyflogau gwarthus iawn, ac mae'r amodau y maen nhw'n lletya'r bobl hyn ynddyn nhw wir yn ofnadwy. Ond does fawr dim y gall Llywodraeth Cymru ei wneud, nid hyd yn oed cydweithio â Llywodraeth y DU. Mae hon yn broblem ryngwladol y mae'n rhaid i'r Cenhedloedd Unedig ymdrin â hi. Gan gadw at yr hyn y gallwn ni wneud rhywbeth yn ei gylch, gwnaethoch chi ddweud mai un o'r ysgogiadau sydd gan Lywodraeth Cymru i gefnogi unigolion a sefydliadau yw gwella eu sgiliau, fel y gallan nhw gael gwaith teg. Felly, roeddwn i eisiau ystyried meysydd yr economi lle'r ydym yn ymwybodol bod heriau recriwtio a chadw. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn buddsoddi swm mawr o arian i ymestyn y cyflog byw gwirioneddol i ofal cymdeithasol a gofal plant, yn ogystal â buddsoddi miliynau lawer, yn amlwg, yn y rhaglen ôl-osod er mwyn optimeiddio. Sut ydych chi'n uwchsgilio pobl sydd wedi'u tangynrychioli yn y sectorau hynny, a phwy, p'un a ydyn nhw'n lleiafrifoedd ethnig neu'n fwy o ddynion mewn gofal plant, mwy o fenywod fel gosodwyr inswleiddio yn y diwydiant adeiladu?
English: Diolch yn fawr, Deputy Presiding Officer. Could I commend the Minister for the work she has done in this area, not just as a Minister or Member of the Senedd, but of course in her previous role as a trade unionist? And I put on record my proud membership of Unite the Union, a community union, here today. I did listen with interest when you mentioned a shorter working week in your statement. Perhaps it's time for a wider conversation on that, and of course the Petitions Committee will be undertaking an inquiry into that, and we would certainly like to hear your views around that. But I want to raise the example that I raised last week in the Chamber, where a young woman, working in the hospitality sector told me, and again, I quote, that she would get more tips if she didn't wear a mask. I simply can't comprehend this. Who on earth thinks that's an acceptable thing to say? It's an absolute disgrace. So, Minister, 'How do we empower young workers?' is my question. I, of course, know many of these powers do sit with the UK Government and colleagues will be well aware today, I'm sure, of my feelings towards the competence of the UK Conservative Government in this field, but having said that, what can we do, working with the powers we do have in Welsh Government, working with our trade union colleagues, to ensure that young workers are empowered and protected?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Dirprwy Lywydd. A gaf i ganmol y Gweinidog am y gwaith y mae hi wedi'i wneud yn y maes hwn, nid yn unig fel Gweinidog neu Aelod o'r Senedd, ond wrth gwrs yn ei swydd flaenorol fel undebwr llafur? A hoffwn i gofnodi fy aelodaeth falch o Unite the Union, undeb cymunedol, sydd yma heddiw. Gwnes i wrando gyda diddordeb pan wnaethoch chi sôn am wythnos waith fyrrach yn eich datganiad. Efallai ei bod yn bryd cael sgwrs ehangach am hynny, ac wrth gwrs bydd y Pwyllgor Deisebau yn cynnal ymchwiliad i hynny, a hoffem ni glywed eich barn am hynny, yn sicr. Ond rwyf i eisiau codi'r enghraifft y gwnes i ei chodi yr wythnos diwethaf yn y Siambr, pan ddywedodd menyw ifanc, sy'n gweithio yn y sector lletygarwch wrthyf i, ac eto, rwy'n dyfynnu, y byddai hi'n cael mwy o dips pe na bai'n gwisgo mwgwd. Ni allaf i ddeall hyn o gwbl. Pwy ar y ddaear sy'n meddwl bod hynny'n beth derbyniol i'w ddweud? Mae'n gwbl warthus. Felly, Gweinidog, 'Sut mae grymuso gweithwyr ifanc?' yw fy nghwestiwn i. Rwyf i, wrth gwrs, yn gwybod bod llawer o'r pwerau hyn yn rhai Llywodraeth y DU a bydd fy nghyd-Aelodau yn ymwybodol iawn heddiw, rwy'n siŵr, o fy nheimladau i tuag at gymhwysedd Llywodraeth Geidwadol y DU yn y maes hwn, ond wedi dweud hynny, beth allwn ni ei wneud, gan weithio gyda'r pwerau sydd gennym ni yn Llywodraeth Cymru, gan weithio gyda'n cydweithwyr yn yr undebau llafur, i sicrhau bod gweithwyr ifanc yn cael eu grymuso a'u diogelu?
English: The next item, therefore, is the Local Authorities (Amendments Relating to Publication of Information) (Wales) Regulations 2022. I call on the Minister for Finance and Local Government to move the motion. Rebecca Evans.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf, felly, yw'r Rheoliadau Awdurdodau Lleol (Diwygiadau sy'n Ymwneud â Chyhoeddi Gwybodaeth) (Cymru) 2022. Dwi'n galw ar y Gweinidog llywodraeth leol i wneud y cynnig. Rebecca Evans.
English: Indeed, there's nobody else who wants to contribute in this debate on this particular issue, so I take it that the Minister doesn't want to respond, so I'll ask the question. The proposal is to agree the motion. Does any Member object? No, there is no objection. Therefore, the motion is agreed in accordance with Standing Order 12.36.
Welsh: Yn wir, does yna neb eisiau siarad yn y ddadl ar y mater yma, felly dwi'n cymryd nad yw'r Gweinidog eisiau ymateb, felly fe wnaf i ofyn y cwestiwn: a ddylid derbyn y cynnig? A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? Nag oes. Ac felly, mae'r cynnig yna wedi ei dderbyn o dan Rheol Sefydlog 12.36.
English: A motion to suspend Standing Orders is next, to enable items 11 and 12 to be debated. I call on the Minister for health to move the motion to suspend Standing Orders.
Welsh: Cynnig i atal Rheolau Sefydlog dros dro sydd nesaf, er mwyn caniatáu i eitemau 11 a 12 gael eu trafod. Dwi'n galw ar y Gweinidog iechyd i wneud y cynnig i atal y Rheolau Sefydlog.
English: The proposal is to suspend Standing Orders temporarily. Does any Member object?
Welsh: Y cynnig yw i atal y Rheolau Sefydlog dros dro. A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu hynny?
English: Any objections to - [ Interruption.] Are you objecting to - [ Interruption.] I didn't quite hear anything there, so I'll move hastily on. [ Laughter. ] The motion to suspend Standing Orders is agreed.
Welsh: Unrhyw wrthwynebiadau i - [ Torri ar draws.] Ydych chi'n gwrthwynebu - [ Torri ar draws.] Wnes i ddim clywed dim byd yn awr, felly byddaf yn symud ymlaen ar frys. [ Chwerthin. ] Mae'r cynnig i atal y Rheolau Sefydlog wedi ei dderbyn.
English: Next, in accordance with Standing Order 12.24, unless a Member objects, the three motions under items 10, 11 and 12 will be grouped for debate, but with separate votes. Those three motions are the Coronavirus Act 2020 (Alteration of Expiry Date) (Wales) Regulations 2022 and the Health Protection (Coronavirus Restrictions) (No. 5) (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2022. So, are there any objections to grouping those motions for debate, but with separate votes? Excellent. There are no objections.
Welsh: Nesaf, yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 12.24, oni bai bod Aelod yn gwrthwynebu, bydd y tri chynnig o dan eitemau 10, 11 a 12 yn cael eu grwpio i'w trafod, gyda phleidleisiau ar wahân. Y tri chynnig hynny yw'r Rheoliadau Deddf y Coronafeirws 2020 (Newid Dyddiad Dod i Ben) (Cymru) 2022 a Rheoliadau Diogelu Iechyd (Cyfyngiadau Coronafeirws) (Rhif 5) (Cymru) (Diwygio) 2022. Felly, a oes unrhyw wrthwynebiad i grwpio'r cynigion yma ar gyfer eu trafod, gyda phleidleisiau ar wahân? Da iawn. Does yna ddim gwrthwynebiad dwi'n ei weld.
English: We will go on to hear the motion. I call on the Minister for health to do just that - Eluned Morgan.
Welsh: Fe awn ni ymlaen i glywed y cynnig. Dwi'n galw ar y Gweinidog iechyd i wneud hynny - Eluned Morgan.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. Sorry for my earlier confusion, I was trying to remove my face mask at the same time as not having my translation equipment on. I do apologise.
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Mae'n ddrwg gen i am fy nryswch cynharach, roeddwn i'n ceisio tynnu fy ngorchudd wyneb ar yr un pryd â pheidio â chael fy offer cyfieithu ymlaen. Rwy'n ymddiheuro.
English: Especially for men, yes. [ Laughter.]
Welsh: Yn enwedig i ddynion. [ Chwerthin.]
English: There are three sets of regulations in front of us today. The first two extend the current situation, and as we are in a challenging situation at the moment, with very high numbers of cases of COVID, we think that that is a sensible thing to do. We will be supporting those regulations, and I don't think that further comments are needed from me on that. But, for the exact reason that we are going to support the continuation of those regulations, we cannot support the No. 8 amendment, because I and the benches here can't understand why the Government has decided to move to raise these safety measures at this point in time.
Welsh: Mae yna dri set o reoliadau o'n blaenau ni heddiw. Mae'r ddau gyntaf yn estyn y sefyllfa bresennol. Gan ein bod ni mewn sefyllfa ddigon heriol ar hyn o bryd efo achosion uchel iawn o COVID, rydyn ni'n credu bod hynny'n beth synhwyrol iawn i'w wneud. Mi fyddwn ni yn cefnogi y rheoliadau hynny, felly, a dwi ddim yn meddwl bod angen sylwadau pellach gen i. Ond am yr union reswm rydyn ni yn mynd i gefnogi parhau â'r rheoliadau hynny, dydyn ni ddim yn gallu cefnogi diwygiad rhif 8, achos dydw i na'r meinciau yma ddim yn gallu deall pam bod y Llywodraeth wedi penderfynu symud i godi'r mesurau diogelwch yma ar y pwynt yma mewn amser.
English: Let me quote the First Minister's words from earlier this afternoon, answering a question, actually, about the ambulance service. He said, 'we have some of the highest numbers of people falling ill with the virus of any time in the whole of the pandemic. Only a matter of weeks ago, we managed to reduce the number of people in our hospital beds suffering from coronavirus down to around 700. It went above 1,400 yesterday' - confirmed by the Minister here now - 'and that number has continued to rise.' He called it 'a very challenging context, and a context that has been deteriorating'. So, in that challenging context, Welsh Government has decided to remove most of the very modest, actually, but important protective measures still in place. And when you consider face coverings in particular, they're just not disruptive at all, are they? Why remove mandation in retail and transport now? And if there are some signs - hopefully there are - that, in Wales as a whole, cases are beginning to stabilise, we can be pretty sure that in some parts of Wales, the west in particular, including Ynys Môn, we haven't reached the peak yet, because that's been the pattern of the spread of this virus throughout. It is an east-west movement. That's how pandemics work. Why expose people more to the virus before we know that we are over this current peak?
Welsh: Gadewch i mi ddyfynnu geiriau'r Prif Weinidog yn gynharach y prynhawn yma, wrth ateb cwestiwn, mewn gwirionedd, am y gwasanaeth ambiwlans. Dywedodd bod 'gennym ni rai o'r niferoedd uchaf o bobl yn mynd yn sâl gyda'r feirws ar unrhyw adeg yn y pandemig cyfan. Dim ond ychydig wythnosau yn ôl, fe wnaethom ni lwyddo i leihau nifer y bobl yn ein gwelyau ysbyty a oedd yn dioddef o'r coronafeirws i lawr i tua 700. Aeth uwchben 1,400 ddoe' - a chadarnhawyd hyn gan y Gweinidog yma nawr - 'ac mae'r nifer hwnnw wedi parhau i godi.' Fe'i galwodd yn gyd-destun 'heriol iawn, a chyd-destun sydd wedi bod yn dirywio'. Felly, yn y cyd-destun heriol hwnnw, mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi penderfynu dileu'r rhan fwyaf o'r mesurau amddiffynnol cymedrol iawn ond pwysig, mewn gwirionedd, sydd ar waith o hyd. A phan fyddwch chi'n ystyried gorchuddion wyneb yn benodol, nid ydyn nhw'n tarfu dim o gwbl, nac ydyn? Pam cael gwared ar y rheolau gorfodol mewn lleoliadau manwerthu a thrafnidiaeth yn awr? Ac os oes rhai arwyddion - gobeithio bod - fod achosion yn dechrau sefydlogi yng Nghymru gyfan, gallwn fod yn eithaf sicr, mewn rhai rhannau o Gymru, y gorllewin yn arbennig, gan gynnwys Ynys Môn, nad ydym wedi cyrraedd yr uchafbwynt eto, oherwydd dyna fu patrwm lledaeniad y feirws hwn drwyddi draw. Mae'n symud o'r dwyrain i'r gorllewin. Dyna sut mae pandemigau'n gweithio. Pam amlygu pobl yn fwy i'r feirws cyn i ni wybod ein bod ni dros yr uchafbwynt presennol hwn?
English: The Minister said this afternoon that we can't keep these regulations in place forever. I agree entirely, and if we were to have this vote in three weeks' time, I'm sure that we would support it. But with people still feeling vulnerable and nervous having to go to a shop or travel by bus or train, why create greater risk for them now? The other safeguard that is being scrapped entirely now is the requirement for people to self-isolate. Again, why do that now? The only reason that I can think that you would want to do that is to help make public services and so on sustainable by getting people who are testing positive to go to work regardless, because, remember, there won't be LFT tests available from Friday free of charge. There won't be a test; if there isn't a test, there won't be a positive test, and if there isn't a positive test, no COVID, so off to work you go. Could the Minister confirm that that is indeed the intention? And if somebody does test positive, if they don't feel ill, they will be under a great deal of pressure, I'm afraid, to go to work. That's why the TUC have said today that they are disappointed with this decision. It will change that relationship between the employer and the employee. If safety is the priority, as the Welsh Government has stated throughout this pandemic, why not wait a little bit longer for this wave to be over? It doesn't make sense to me, and it doesn't make sense to the high number of people who have contacted me and, I suspect, a number of other Members since the announcement on Friday of last week.
Welsh: Mi ddywedodd y Gweinidog y prynhawn yma allwn ni ddim cadw rheoliadau yn eu lle am byth. Dwi'n cytuno yn llwyr, a phetasem ni'n cael y bleidlais yma mewn tair wythnos, dwi'n reit siŵr y buaswn i'n ei chefnogi, ond efo pobl sydd yn dal yn teimlo'n fregus ac yn nerfus yn gorfod mynd i siop neu fynd ar fws neu drên, pam creu mwy o risg iddyn nhw rŵan? Y warchodaeth arall sy'n mynd yn llwyr rŵan ydy'r gofyn ar bobl i hunanynysu. Eto, pam gwneud hynny rŵan? Yr unig reswm y gallaf i feddwl pam y byddech chi am wneud hynny ydy i helpu gwneud gwasanaethau cyhoeddus ac ati yn gynaliadwy drwy gael pobl sydd yn profi'n bositif i fynd i'r gwaith beth bynnag, achos, cofiwch, fydd yna ddim profion LFT ar gael o ddydd Gwener am ddim, dim prawf, dim prawf positif - dim prawf positif, dim COVID, felly i'r gwaith â chi. O bosib. All y Gweinidog gadarnhau mai dyna ydy'r bwriad? A hyd yn oed os oes rhywun yn profi'n bositif, os dydyn nhw ddim yn sâl, mi fyddan nhw dan bwysau mawr, dwi'n ofni, i fynd i'r gwaith. Dyna pam fod y TUC heddiw wedi dweud eu bod nhw yn siomedig efo'r penderfyniad yma. Mi fydd o'n newid y berthynas rhwng y cyflogwr a'r sawl sy'n cael ei gyflogi. Os mai diogelwch ydy'r flaenoriaeth, fel mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ei fynnu drwy gydol y pandemig yma, pam ddim disgwyl ychydig bach i'r don yma fod drosodd? Dydy o ddim yn gwneud synnwyr i fi a dydy o ddim yn gwneud synnwyr i'r nifer uchel o bobl sydd wedi bod yn cysylltu efo fi a, dwi'n amau, efo llawer o Aelodau eraill ers y cyhoeddiad ddydd Gwener ddiwethaf.
English: To conclude, Llywydd, I understand that Welsh Government has had to make all sorts of political judgments after looking at evidence. In this case, I just think Welsh Government has got its judgment wrong, and that's why we'll be opposing this amended regulation.
Welsh: I gloi, Llywydd, rwy'n deall bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gorfod gwneud pob math o arfarniadau gwleidyddol ar ôl edrych ar dystiolaeth. Yn yr achos hwn, rwy'n credu bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi cael ei farn yn anghywir, a dyna pam y byddwn ni'n gwrthwynebu'r rheoliad diwygiedig hwn.