English: So, it's very much part of 'Planning Policy Wales', however, which has only very recently been reviewed, and, as I said in response to Adam Price, One Planet development planning applications are determined in accordance with the approved or adopted development plan for the area, unless there are material considerations that indicate otherwise. And, as you've just said, they're routinely turned down where they don't conform. The planning system isn't there to prevent people from making planning applications; local authorities are responsible for determining those planning applications in accordance with the rules. And I'm not sure whether Suzy Davies was implying that only people from outside an area can make a One Planet development application, but, of course, that's not so; anyone can make one if they want to bring one forward. So, I'm not quite sure what the implication of that was. Obviously, we have a large number of other planning policies in place, including policies that allow individual houses to be built where there's a need for an agricultural family to be able to expand its dwelling. So, typically, where a farmer wants to retire and a son or daughter of that farmer wants to take over, we have applications for dwellings on the farmhouse to enable us to accommodate that, and the policy is perfectly capable of looking at that. So, I'm not entirely certain why One Planet developments attract the kind of criticism that Suzy Davies has just outlined, but there are, of course, a large number of other ways of making sure that our young people stay in our rural communities and our communities in general, and one of those, of course, is this Government's plan to build a range of social and shared equity housing across Wales at some scale and pace.
Welsh: Mae'n rhan bwysig iawn o 'Bolisi Cynllunio Cymru', fodd bynnag, sydd wedi cael ei adolygu'n ddiweddar iawn, ac fel y dywedais mewn ymateb i Adam Price, penderfynir ar geisiadau cynllunio datblygu Un Blaned yn unol â'r cynllun datblygu a gymeradwywyd neu a fabwysiadwyd ar gyfer yr ardal, oni bai bod ystyriaethau perthnasol yn dynodi fel arall. Ac, fel rydych newydd ei ddweud, maent yn cael eu gwrthod fel mater o drefn lle nad ydynt yn cydymffurfio. Nid yw'r system gynllunio yno i atal pobl rhag gwneud ceisiadau cynllunio; awdurdodau lleol sy'n gyfrifol am benderfynu ar y ceisiadau cynllunio hynny yn unol â'r rheolau. Ac nid wyf yn siŵr a oedd Suzy Davies yn awgrymu mai dim ond pobl o'r tu allan i ardal all wneud cais datblygu Un Blaned, ond wrth gwrs, nid yw hynny'n wir; gall unrhyw un wneud cais os ydynt eisiau cyflwyno un. Felly, nid wyf yn hollol siŵr beth oedd hynny'n ei olygu. Yn amlwg, mae gennym nifer fawr o bolisïau cynllunio eraill ar waith, gan gynnwys polisïau sy'n caniatáu i dai unigol gael eu hadeiladu lle mae angen i deulu amaethyddol allu ehangu ei annedd. Felly, fel arfer, lle mae ffermwr eisiau ymddeol a mab neu ferch i'r ffermwr hwnnw eisiau cymryd yr awenau, mae gennym geisiadau am anheddau ar y ffermdy i'n galluogi i ddarparu ar gyfer hynny, ac mae'r polisi'n gwbl abl i edrych ar hynny. Felly, nid wyf yn gwbl sicr pam fod datblygiadau Un Blaned yn denu'r math o feirniadaeth y mae Suzy Davies newydd ei hamlinellu, ond wrth gwrs, mae nifer fawr o ffyrdd eraill o sicrhau bod ein pobl ifanc yn aros yn ein cymunedau gwledig a'n cymunedau yn gyffredinol, ac un o'r rheini, wrth gwrs, yw cynllun y Llywodraeth hon i adeiladu amrywiaeth o dai cymdeithasol a thai rhannu ecwiti ledled Cymru yn gyflym ac ar raddfa fawr.