English: Yes, and I want to recognise in particular the point about the contaminated blood inquiry, because the impact of the health service is so great because we recognise the challenges we would have without it. That also means that there are times when healthcare goes wrong and has a huge impact on people's lives too. And there is always learning to be taken from complaints and from when we get things wrong. And, actually, the contaminated blood scandal has led to a significant improvement in the safety and the traceability of the use of blood and blood products within our health service. We can be really proud of the work that is being undertaken by the Welsh Blood Service in pioneering a different range of ways to deliver medical benefit. The challenge then, looking back, is not just how we learn lessons but this challenge of understanding what really happened, because that's the biggest grievance that I think people have, that they don't ever think they've been told the truth and they never got to the truth. So, I welcome not just the inquiry, but the way that Sir Brian Langstaff has gone about the inquiry as the appointed Chair - a recently retired judge and a man of significant integrity. I think he's developed trust from a community who weren't really sure they could trust the inquiry itself. And I also think it was helpful to move the sponsor department from the UK Department of health to the UK Cabinet Office as well, and I welcome the move that was taken to do so. So, we do want to encourage people to give evidence. My officials continue to have regular conversations with Haemophilia Wales and other stakeholders here in Wales about their expectations for the inquiry and the practical business of how we support them to give evidence to the inquiry, including here in Wales, which we have asked for and I think will happen. And our challenge is how we have a conversation with not just the Cabinet Office, but the inquiry itself about how it goes about its business to make sure people really can tell their story and ask questions where they think they've not been answered before. And, in that regard, I'm very pleased that Sir Brian has indicated that he expects to have additional experts for particular parts of the inquiry. So, they haven't ruled out having an additional wing members to sit with him when it comes to deliberations, but, in the evidence-gathering part of it, he is looking to make use of additional expertise for different parts of what went wrong at the time, and I think that is a real advantage. So, I approach this with some cautious optimism at the outset, but we will, of course, continue to listen to and work with stakeholders here in Wales.
Welsh: Ie, a hoffwn gydnabod yn benodol y pwynt am yr ymchwiliad i waed wedi'i heintio. Mae effaith y gwasanaeth iechyd mor fawr oherwydd ein bod yn cydnabod yr heriau a fyddai gennym hebddo. Mae hynny hefyd yn golygu bod yna adegau pan fydd gofal iechyd yn mynd o'i le ac yn cael effaith enfawr ar fywydau pobl hefyd. Ac mae bob amser rhywbeth i'w ddysgu o gwynion ac o achosion pan fyddwn yn gwneud pethau'n anghywir. Ac, mewn gwirionedd, mae'r sgandal gwaed wedi'i heintio wedi arwain at welliant sylweddol yn niogelwch a'r gallu i olrhain y defnydd o waed a chynhyrchion gwaed yn ein gwasanaeth iechyd. Gallwn fod yn falch iawn o'r gwaith a wneir gan Wasanaeth Gwaed Cymru wrth arloesi amrywiaeth o wahanol ffyrdd o gyflawni buddion meddygol. Yr her wedyn, wrth edrych yn ôl, yw nid yn unig sut y byddwn yn dysgu gwersi ond yr her hon o ddeall beth ddigwyddodd mewn gwirionedd. Dyna'r gŵyn fwyaf sydd gan bobl, yn fy marn i, eu bod yn credu nad ydynt erioed wedi cael gwybod y gwir ac na wnaethant erioed gyrraedd y gwir. Felly, rwy'n croesawu nid yn unig yr ymchwiliad, ond y ffordd y mae Syr Brian Langstaff wedi mynd ati i gynnal yr ymchwiliad fel y Cadeirydd a benodwyd - barnwr sydd wedi ymddeol yn ddiweddar a dyn sy'n meddu ar unplygrwydd sylweddol. Rwy'n credu ei fod wedi datblygu ffydd gan gymuned nad oedd yn siŵr, mewn gwirionedd, y gallen nhw fod â ffydd yn yr ymchwiliad ei hun. Ac rwy'n credu hefyd y bu o gymorth i symud yr adran noddi o Adran Iechyd y DU i Swyddfa Cabinet y DU, ac rwy'n croesawu'r cam a gymerwyd i wneud hynny. Felly, rydym ni eisiau annog pobl i roi tystiolaeth. Mae fy swyddogion yn parhau i gael sgyrsiau rheolaidd â Hemoffilia Cymru a rhanddeiliaid eraill yma yng Nghymru am eu disgwyliadau ar gyfer yr ymchwiliad a'r busnes ymarferol o sut yr ydym yn eu cefnogi i roi tystiolaeth i'r ymchwiliad, gan gynnwys yma yng Nghymru. Rydym wedi gofyn am hynny a chredaf y bydd hynny'n digwydd. A'n her ni yw sut y cawn ni sgwrs â nid yn unig Swyddfa'r Cabinet, ond yr ymchwiliad ei hun ynghylch sut y mae'n mynd ati i weithredu i wneud yn siŵr y gall pobl ddweud eu stori mewn gwirionedd a gofyn cwestiynau os ydyn nhw o'r farn nad ydyn nhw wedi cael eu hateb o'r blaen. Ac, yn hynny o beth, rwy'n falch iawn fod Syr Brian wedi nodi ei fod yn disgwyl y bydd arbenigwyr ychwanegol ar gyfer rhannau penodol o'r ymchwiliad. Felly, dydyn nhw heb ddiystyru bod ag aelodau ategol ychwanegol i eistedd gydag ef pan ddaw'r trafodaethau, ond, yn y rhan casglu tystiolaeth ohono, mae'n bwriadu gwneud defnydd o arbenigedd ychwanegol ar gyfer gwahanol rannau o'r hyn a aeth o'i le ar y pryd, ac rwy'n credu bod hynny yn fantais wirioneddol. Felly, rwy'n ymdrin â hyn gyda rhywfaint o optimistiaeth bwyllog ar y cychwyn, ond byddwn, wrth gwrs, yn parhau i wrando a gweithio gyda rhanddeiliaid yma yng Nghymru.