techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Something that animates quite a lot of local people is the fact that there's no mandate within the planning system for facilities for many of those new estates. So, sometimes you have housing estates that are well-kept and they have provision in that regard, but they don't have parks, they don't have any surgeries, they don't have those things that would create a community. The system, therefore, alienates a lot of people who may not mind having those new houses in their local community, but would welcome some investment in the infrastructure around that. So, what more can you do as a Government to look at how we can build in these facilities to the local planning systems, so that we can be assured that when we're creating homes we're creating communities as well?
Welsh: Rhywbeth sy'n cynhyrfu llawer o bobl leol yw'r ffaith nad oes unrhyw fandad yn y system gynllunio ar gyfer cyfleusterau ar gyfer llawer o'r ystadau newydd hynny. Felly, weithiau mae gennych ystadau tai sy'n cael eu cadw'n dda ac mae ganddynt ddarpariaeth yn hynny o beth, ond nid oes ganddynt barciau, nid oes ganddynt unrhyw feddygfeydd, nid oes ganddynt y pethau a fyddai'n creu cymuned. Mae'r system, felly, yn gelyniaethu llawer o bobl na fyddent, efallai, yn gwrthwynebu'r tai newydd hyn yn eu cymuned leol, ond byddent yn croesawu rhywfaint o fuddsoddiad yn y seilwaith sydd ynghlwm wrth hynny. Felly, beth arall y gallwch ei wneud fel Llywodraeth i edrych ar sut y gallwn adeiladu'r cyfleusterau hyn i mewn yn y systemau cynllunio lleol, fel y gallwn fod yn sicr, pan fyddwn yn creu cartrefi, ein bod yn creu cymunedau hefyd?
English: I think the Member raises a very important point. I was talking to the chief planning officer this morning, for instance, around health boards giving evidence when there are new planning developments. They're not mandatory consultees at the moment, and I'm wondering whether they should be because, clearly, primary care provision is very important. So, it's something we're looking at, and, obviously, I'll be very happy to update Members.
Welsh: Credaf fod yr Aelod yn codi pwynt pwysig iawn. Bûm yn siarad â'r prif swyddog cynllunio y bore yma, er enghraifft, ynglŷn â byrddau iechyd yn rhoi tystiolaeth pan geir datblygiadau cynllunio newydd. Nid ydynt yn ymgyngoreion gorfodol ar hyn o bryd, ac rwy'n meddwl tybed a ddylent fod, oherwydd yn amlwg, mae darpariaeth gofal sylfaenol yn bwysig iawn. Felly, mae'n rhywbeth rydym yn ei ystyried, ac yn amlwg, byddaf yn fwy na pharod i roi'r wybodaeth ddiweddaraf i'r Aelodau.
English: As we set out in 'Brexit and our land', we consider the Welsh language to be an inseparable part of the social fabric of parts of rural Wales. A Welsh language impact assessment will be undertaken by the Welsh Government before any final decisions are taken on the design of new schemes.
Welsh: Fel y nodir gennym yn 'Brexit a'n tir', credwn fod yr iaith Gymraeg yn rhan annatod o wead cymdeithasol rhannau o'r Gymru wledig. Bydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn cynnal asesiad o'r effaith ar y Gymraeg cyn gwneud unrhyw benderfyniadau terfynol ynglŷn â dyluniad cynlluniau newydd.
English: Thank you very much. That's what I suspected: no assessments and no intention of doing that until the results of the consultation are collated. Now, it's clear that a fair bit of officials' time and Government money has already been invested in developing the proposals contained within 'Brexit and our land'. So, isn't this process, the Government process of developing policy, entirely flawed? Because the risk is that you will reach the next stage after you've completed the consultation and find that the proposals are damaging to the Welsh language and other areas, such as the rural economy, and therefore you will have to drop them, and then you will have wasted everyone's time and Government resources and will have unnecessarily caused anxiety among rural communities.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr. Dyna roeddwn i'n ei amau: hynny yw, dim astudiaeth a dim bwriad i wneud hynny tan i ganlyniadau'r ymgynghoriad gael eu casglu. Rŵan, mae'n amlwg bod tipyn o amser swyddogion ac arian y Llywodraeth wedi cael ei fuddsoddi'n barod i ddatblygu'r cynigion - y rhai sydd yn y ddogfen 'Brexit a'n tir'. Felly, onid ydy'r broses yma, proses y Llywodraeth o ddatblygu polisi, yn gwbl ddiffygiol? Oherwydd y peryg ydy y gwnewch chi gyrraedd y cam nesaf ar ôl ichi gwblhau'r ymgynghoriad a darganfod bod y cynigion yn niweidio'r Gymraeg a meysydd eraill, hefyd, fel yr economi wledig, ac felly mi fydd yn rhaid i chi eu gollwng nhw, a byddwch chi wedyn wedi gwastraffu amser pawb ac adnoddau'r Llywodraeth ac wedi codi dychryn dianghenraid ymhlith y gymuned yng nghefn gwlad.
English: No, not at all, because as I said in an earlier answer - I think it was to Llyr - we haven't done those assessments and that modelling because we are out to consultation. But, I said in my opening remarks to you that we specifically included the Welsh language in that document, and I also think 'Brexit and our land' has a very community and cultural focus, and, of course, the Welsh language is an integral part of that. The agricultural sector is probably the sector in Wales that uses the Welsh language the most, and I absolutely want to protect that. We are committed, as I mentioned, to keeping farmers on the land and to working with them for that prosperous future, and that offer, I think, will ensure that we have a future for the Welsh language, by creating stability and long-term viability for our farmers.
Welsh: Na, dim o gwbl, oherwydd fel y dywedais mewn ateb cynharach - i Llyr, rwy'n credu - nid ydym wedi cynnal yr asesiadau hynny a'r gwaith modelu hwnnw gan ein bod yn ymgynghori ar hyn o bryd. Ond dywedais yn fy sylwadau agoriadol i chi ein bod wedi cynnwys y Gymraeg yn benodol yn y ddogfen honno, a chredaf hefyd fod gan 'Brexit a'n tir' ffocws cymunedol a diwylliannol cryf, ac wrth gwrs, mae'r Gymraeg yn rhan annatod o hynny. Y sector amaethyddol, yn ôl pob tebyg, yw'r sector sy'n defnyddio fwyaf ar y Gymraeg yng Nghymru, ac yn sicr, rwy'n awyddus i ddiogelu hynny. Rydym wedi ymrwymo, fel y soniais, i gadw ffermwyr ar y tir ac i weithio gyda hwy i sicrhau dyfodol ffyniannus, ac yn fy marn i, bydd y cynnig hwnnw'n sicrhau bod gennym ddyfodol i'r Gymraeg, drwy greu sefydlogrwydd a hyfywedd hirdymor i'n ffermwyr.
English: Well, I agree with Siân Gwenllian. There's no point including a question in a consultation for something that you've not offered any evidence for. A few clichéd words about the place of the Welsh language in rural communities really doesn't count. Did you receive any advice from the Welsh Language Commissioner about how to collate the evidence before consulting?
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n cytuno â Siân Gwenllian. Nid oes pwynt cynnwys cwestiwn mewn ymgynghoriad am rywbeth nad ydych chi wedi cynnig unrhyw dystiolaeth arno. Nid yw cwpwl o eiriau ystrydebol ar le mae'r iaith Gymraeg mewn cymunedau gwledig really ddim yn cyfrif. A gawsoch chi unrhyw gyngor gan Gomisiynydd y Gymraeg ynghylch sut i gasglu a chyfleu tystiolaeth cyn ymgynghori?
English: If we'd have done extensive modelling and impact assessments before the consultation, I would be criticised for that. You just can't please some people and, unfortunately, I think this is the most appropriate way to do it. All the modelling and assessments, as I said, will be done before we go out to consultation in the spring on the specific schemes. There has been contact with the Welsh Language Commissioner at an official level, and also I have had discussions with ministerial colleagues.
Welsh: Pe baem wedi cynnal asesiadau effaith a gwneud gwaith modelu helaeth cyn yr ymgynghoriad, buaswn wedi cael fy meirniadu am hynny. Ni allwch fodloni rhai pobl, ac yn anffodus, credaf mai hon yw'r ffordd fwyaf priodol o'i wneud. Fel y dywedais, cwblheir yr holl waith modelu ac asesiadau cyn y byddwn yn ymgynghori yn y gwanwyn ar y cynlluniau penodol. Cafwyd cyswllt gyda Chomisiynydd y Gymraeg ar lefel swyddogol, ac rwyf hefyd wedi cael trafodaethau gyda chyd-Weinidogion.
English: Thank you. Local health boards are a specific consultation body set out in local development plan regulations. They provide advice to local planning authorities on the land requirements for the development of their own estate and the ability of new development to be served by existing and proposed health facilities.
Welsh: Diolch. Mae byrddau iechyd lleol yn gyrff ymgynghori penodol a nodir yn rheoliadau'r cynlluniau datblygu lleol. Maent yn darparu cyngor i awdurdodau cynllunio lleol ynglŷn â gofynion tir ar gyfer datblygu eu hystâd eu hunain yn ogystal â'r gallu i ddatblygiadau newydd gael eu gwasanaethu gan gyfleusterau iechyd presennol ac arfaethedig.
English: Thank you, Cabinet Secretary. You'll know that I've written to you about this matter that, in practice, very little happens in terms of consultation with the health boards. Many of them do not engage with it properly and it certainly doesn't feed down to the general practice level. In a number of recent applications involving substantial planning developments in my constituency what we actually found out was that the GP practices themselves are not engaged in the process - they are not statutory consultees, even though the ability to provide vital health services in those communities are important. And we've had GP practices telling us that if certain developments go ahead, they will not be able to deliver the level of health service, and it will have an adverse impact. Isn't it about time that we actually changed the process now so that, when we have such applications - and there are many of them going on in the Taff Ely area - there is a direct and statutory consultation process, engaging with those vital public services, in particular the health services that have such vital information to give, to be taken into account when consideration is given to whether or not to give planning permission?
Welsh: Diolch, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet. Fe fyddwch yn ymwybodol fy mod wedi ysgrifennu atoch ynglŷn â'r mater hwn, mai ychydig iawn sy'n digwydd, yn ymarferol, o ran ymgynghori â byrddau iechyd. Mae llawer ohonynt yn methu ymroi i hyn yn briodol, ac yn sicr, nid yw'n bwydo i lawr i lefel ymarfer cyffredinol. Mewn nifer o geisiadau diweddar sy'n ymwneud â datblygiadau cynllunio sylweddol yn fy etholaeth, yr hyn a welsom mewn gwirionedd oedd nad yw'r practisau meddygon teulu eu hunain yn ymwneud â'r broses - nid ydynt yn ymgyngoreion statudol, er bod gallu darparu gwasanaethau iechyd hanfodol yn y cymunedau hynny'n bwysig. Ac mae practisau meddygon teulu wedi dweud wrthym, os bydd rhai datblygiadau yn mynd rhagddynt, na fyddant yn gallu darparu'r lefel o wasanaeth iechyd, a bydd yn cael effaith andwyol. Onid yw'n hen bryd inni newid y broses bellach er mwyn sicrhau, pan fyddwn yn derbyn ceisiadau o'r fath - ac mae llawer ohonynt ar y gweill yn ardal Taf Elái - y ceir proses ymgynghori statudol ac uniongyrchol, gan ymgysylltu â'r gwasanaethau cyhoeddus hanfodol hynny, yn enwedig y gwasanaethau iechyd sydd â'r fath wybodaeth hanfodol i'w rhoi, a'u cadw mewn cof wrth ystyried a ddylid rhoi caniatâd cynllunio ai peidio?
English: Well, you will have heard me say in an earlier answer to Bethan Sayed that I am looking at whether health boards should be mandatory consultees in this decision making. I think, in many cases, the capacity of primary care facilities is really an important, material consideration when you are planning the merits of having a development in a certain area. I do expect local health boards to be engaged in the preparation of LDPs with planning authorities, given their responsibility, obviously, for providing primary care services for the local population. I think it's really important that GP surgeries, on an individual basis, feed into that process also.
Welsh: Wel, fe fyddwch wedi fy nghlywed yn dweud mewn ateb cynharach i Bethan Sayed fy mod yn ystyried a ddylai byrddau iechyd fod yn ymgyngoreion gorfodol yn y broses o wneud y penderfyniadau. Mewn llawer o achosion, credaf fod capasiti'r cyfleusterau gofal sylfaenol yn ystyriaeth bwysig a pherthnasol iawn wrth i chi gynllunio rhinweddau datblygiad mewn ardal benodol. Rwy'n disgwyl i fyrddau iechyd lleol gymryd rhan yn y broses o baratoi cynlluniau datblygu lleol gydag awdurdodau cynllunio, o gofio eu cyfrifoldeb, yn amlwg, i ddarparu gwasanaethau gofal sylfaenol ar gyfer y boblogaeth leol. Credaf ei bod yn wirioneddol bwysig fod meddygfeydd, ar sail unigol, yn bwydo i mewn i'r broses honno hefyd.
English: The next item, therefore, is the questions to the Cabinet Secretary for Local Government and Public Services. Question 1 is withdrawn. Question 2, David Rees.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf, felly, yw'r cwestiynau i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Lywodraeth Leol a Gwasanaethau Cyhoeddus. Mae cwestiwn 1 [OAQ52692] wedi'i dynnu'n ôl, felly cwestiwn 2, David Rees.
English: I met with UK Ministers in July and regularly meet with the head of Her Majesty's Prison and Probation Service in Wales to discuss the probation services provided to Welsh prisoners.
Welsh: Cyfarfûm â Gweinidogion y DU ym mis Gorffennaf ac rwy'n cyfarfod yn rheolaidd â phennaeth Gwasanaeth Carchardai a Phrawf ei Mawrhydi yng Nghymru i drafod y gwasanaethau prawf a ddarperir i garcharorion Cymru.
English: Thank you for that answer, Cabinet Secretary. As you're aware, in 2014, the then Tory-led UK Government decided to privatise the probation service, splitting it in two: the National Probation Service and the community rehabilitation companies, which are also here in Wales. Now, last December, we had a report from the chief inspector of the Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Probation, Dame Glenys Stacey, which expressed deep concern over the failures of the privatisation and the chaos that existed in the system. Last week, she had another report expressing deep and grave concerns over the safety of victims of domestic abuse because of the failure of those private companies to protect those victims from their abusers. Now, it's time, surely, that these contracts were killed now and that this whole responsibility was transferred to the Welsh Government. Do you agree with me that the UK Government needs to take action - not in 2020, two years down the line when these are going to have been failing for another two years, but now, and transfer these to the Welsh Government so that you can take the actions necessary for Welsh citizens?
Welsh: Diolch am eich ateb, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet. Fel y gwyddoch, yn 2014, penderfynodd Llywodraeth Geidwadol y DU ar y pryd breifateiddio'r gwasanaeth prawf gan ei hollti'n ddwy ran: y Gwasanaeth Prawf Cenedlaethol a'r cwmnïau adsefydlu cymunedol, sydd hefyd i'w cael yma yng Nghymru. Nawr, fis Rhagfyr diwethaf, cawsom adroddiad gan brif arolygydd Arolygiaeth Prawf Ei Mawrhydi, y Fonesig Glenys Stacey, a fynegodd gryn bryder ynglŷn â methiannau'r broses breifateiddio a'r anhrefn a oedd yn bodoli yn y system. Yr wythnos diwethaf, roedd ganddi adroddiad arall yn mynegi pryderon dwys a difrifol ynghylch diogelwch dioddefwyr cam-drin domestig oherwydd methiant y cwmnïau preifat hynny i ddiogelu'r dioddefwyr rhag y rhai a oedd yn eu cam-drin. Nawr, mae'n hen bryd lladd y contractau hyn bellach a throsglwyddo'r cyfrifoldeb hwn i Lywodraeth Cymru. A ydych yn cytuno fod angen i Lywodraeth y DU roi camau ar waith - nid yn 2020, ddwy flynedd yn y dyfodol pan fydd y rhain wedi bod yn methu am ddwy flynedd arall, ond yn awr, a'u trosglwyddo i Lywodraeth Cymru fel y gallwch gymryd y camau angenrheidiol ar ran dinasyddion Cymru?
English: I do agree with the Member for Port Talbot, in terms of the analysis that he has of the failures of the probation service. These are matters I have discussed both with the service itself and with Ministers in the United Kingdom Government. I agree with him also that these matters should properly be held here, and be the responsibility of the Welsh Government. He may be interested to know that the UK Government did announce in July that there would be a consultation on the future of the probation service. The Welsh Government has responded to that consultation. I will be leading a debate in this place on 23 October to listen to what Members have to say about how they want to see the service developed in Wales, but I was very pleased to see that the proposals that the Ministry of Justice are making for Wales are distinct and recognise the distinct position of Wales. I believe they are a first step on the route to the sort of probation service that delivers coherent and holistic services in Wales and delivers for the people of Wales.
Welsh: Rwy'n cytuno â'r Aelod dros Bort Talbot, o ran ei ddadansoddiad o fethiannau'r gwasanaeth prawf. Mae'r rhain yn faterion rwyf wedi'u trafod gyda'r gwasanaeth ei hun a chyda Gweinidogion yn Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig. Rwy'n cytuno ag ef mai yma y dylai'r materion hyn fod, yn gyfrifoldeb i Lywodraeth Cymru. Efallai y byddai'n falch o wybod bod Llywodraeth y DU wedi cyhoeddi ym mis Gorffennaf y byddai ymgynghoriad yn cael ei gynnal ar ddyfodol y gwasanaeth prawf. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ymateb i'r ymgynghoriad hwnnw. Byddaf yn arwain dadl yn y lle hwn ar 23 Hydref i wrando ar yr hyn sydd gan yr Aelodau i'w ddweud ynglŷn â sut yr hoffent weld y gwasanaeth yn cael ei ddatblygu yng Nghymru, ond roeddwn yn falch iawn o weld bod y cynigion y mae'r Weinyddiaeth Gyfiawnder yn eu gwneud ar gyfer Cymru yn neilltuol ac yn cydnabod sefyllfa neilltuol Cymru. Credaf mai dyma'r cam cyntaf ar y llwybr at y math o wasanaeth prawf sy'n darparu gwasanaethau cydlynol a chyfannol yng Nghymru ac sy'n cyflawni ar gyfer pobl Cymru.
English: The Tories' ideological privatisation of the probation service has been an unmitigated, if not predictable, disaster. It's left existing probation staff feeling demoralised, and it's also increased the danger posed to the public. The Tories should be full of regret and shame for wrecking what was an effective public service. In a briefing earlier year, Napo, the trade union representing probation officers, said that the present structure has probably come too far to be reversed, but they have proposed some measures to ameliorate the consequences of probation privatisation. This includes the establishment of a locally accountable commissioning body that could comprise the Welsh Government and our police and crime commissioners. While we wait for the devolution of the probation service, would you be willing to take part in such a body, and can you tell us whether you've begun talks to progress such an arrangement yet?
Welsh: Mae ideoleg y Torïaid o breifateiddio'r gwasanaeth prawf wedi bod yn drychineb llwyr, os nad yn un ragweladwy. Mae wedi gwangalonni'r staff prawf presennol, ac mae hefyd wedi cynyddu'r perygl a wynebir gan y cyhoedd. Dylai'r Torïaid fod yn llawn edifeirwch a chywilydd am chwalu'r hyn a oedd yn wasanaeth cyhoeddus effeithiol. Mewn cyfarfod briffio yn gynharach eleni, dywedodd Napo, yr undeb llafur sy'n cynrychioli swyddogion prawf, fod y strwythur presennol wedi dod yn rhy bell i'w wrthdroi mae'n debyg, ond maent wedi argymell rhai mesurau i leddfu effeithiau preifateiddio'r gwasanaeth prawf. Mae hyn yn cynnwys sefydlu corff comisiynu sy'n atebol yn lleol a allai gynnwys Llywodraeth Cymru a'n comisiynwyr heddlu a throseddu. Wrth inni aros i'r gwasanaeth prawf gael ei ddatganoli, a fyddech yn barod i gymryd rhan mewn corff o'r fath, ac a allwch ddweud wrthym a ydych wedi dechrau trafodaethau i ddatblygu trefniant o'r fath eto?
English: Presiding Officer, in my earlier answer, I said I've been in discussion on these matters at both a ministerial and official level for some time, and I've made that point clear to Members here on previous occasions. I do recognise the proposal made by the Member for the Rhondda, and I am very happy to enter into conversations about that. However, at the moment, we are looking at the reunification of the probation service in Wales, as a single, publicly accountable service. We are looking at the way in which the community rehabilitation contracts are ended in Wales, and that the service is provided as a single, coherent, public service - and that is the basis of the conversations I'm having at the moment. And it is to further explore Members' views on these matters that I have proposed that we have a debate on this matter later in the month.
Welsh: Lywydd, yn fy ateb cynharach, dywedais fy mod wedi bod yn trafod y materion hyn ar lefel weinidogol a swyddogol ers peth amser, ac rwyf wedi dweud hynny'n glir wrth yr Aelodau yma yn y gorffennol. Rwy'n cydnabod y cynnig a wnaed gan yr Aelod dros y Rhondda, ac rwy'n fwy na pharod i gynnal trafodaethau ynglŷn â hynny. Fodd bynnag, ar hyn o bryd, rydym yn ystyried ailuno'r gwasanaeth prawf yng Nghymru, i fod yn un gwasanaeth sy'n atebol i'r cyhoedd. Rydym yn edrych ar y ffordd y caiff y contractau adsefydlu cymunedol eu dirwyn i ben yng Nghymru, a bod y gwasanaeth yn cael ei ddarparu fe un gwasanaeth cyhoeddus cydlynol - a dyna yw sail y sgyrsiau rwy'n eu cael ar hyn o bryd. Ac er mwyn archwilio safbwyntiau'r Aelodau ar y materion hyn ymhellach, rwyf wedi cynnig cael dadl ar y mater yn ddiweddarach y mis hwn.
English: The Government's overall budget priorities, including the funding for local authorities, were set out yesterday. I will announce the provisional local government settlement on 9 October.
Welsh: Cafodd blaenoriaethau cyffredin y Llywodraeth ar gyfer y gyllideb, gan gynnwys y cyllid ar gyfer awdurdodau lleol, eu hamlinellu ddoe. Byddaf yn cyhoeddi setliad llywodraeth leol dros dro ar 9 Hydref.
English: A few weeks ago, we heard from the chief executive of Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council saying that they would have to make people redundant unless funding was made available for the teachers' pay rise from the Westminster Government centrally. Now, I'm proud to say that Ben Lake, Plaid Cymru MP, has requested that funding from the Westminster Government in Parliament there, and he has been of great assistance in ensuring that the funding will be made available to Wales. So, can I ask when will that funding be provided to Neath Port Talbot council, so that they don't have to consider redundancies, and so that they can give the very deserved pay rise to teachers within that council?
Welsh: Cwpwl o wythnosau nôl, fe wnaethom ni glywed gan brif weithredwr cyngor Castell-nedd Port Talbot yn dweud y byddai'n rhaid iddyn nhw wneud pobl yn ddiwaith pe na byddai'r arian yn dod ar gyfer codiad cyflog athrawon o Lywodraeth San Steffan yn ganolog. Wrth gwrs, rydw i'n browd i ddweud bod Ben Lake, Aelod Seneddol Plaid Cymru, wedi gofyn am yr arian hynny i ddod o Lywodraeth San Steffan yn y Senedd yno, ac mae e wedi helpu yn fawr iawn i sicrhau bod yr arian yn dod i Gymru. Ac felly, a allaf i ofyn pryd fydd yr arian hynny yn mynd i gyngor Castell-nedd Port Talbot, fel nad oes rhaid iddyn nhw ystyried gwneud pobl yn ddiwaith, ac fel eu bod yn gallu rhoi'r codiad cyflog, sydd yn haeddiannol iawn, i athrawon yn y cyngor sir hynny?
English: There was a statement yesterday from the finance Secretary, stating that Welsh Government will fund the teachers' pay increase in full, and that will happen as part of the settlement and as part of next year's budget.
Welsh: Mi oedd yna ddatganiad ddoe gan y Gweinidog cyllid fod Llywodraeth Cymru yn mynd i ariannu'r codiad cyflog i athrawon yn llawn, ac mi fydd hynny yn digwydd fel rhan o'r setliad ac fel rhan o'r gyllideb y flwyddyn nesaf.