English: Over the past few days, we have seen an attempt by Parliament to try and navigate the UK out of the stormy seas that have come close to capsizing our country. In a series of votes, we have seen the House of Commons edging gradually towards a different vision for Brexit. We have very little time left, but in a few days Members of Parliament have achieved a more widely shared perspective than the Prime Minister and her Cabinet have achieved in almost three years. So, let me start, therefore, unusually, perhaps, by paying tribute to some of the MPs who have put their country above partisan loyalties and have genuinely sought to find an approach that can command a majority in the Commons. Often, that sometimes means putting their own political careers on the line - MPs such as Nick Boles on the Conservative side, Yvette Cooper and Hilary Benn on the Labour side, and indeed Plaid Cymru MPs who drew attention during voting last night to 'Securing Wales' Future', a document supported by this Assembly as one way forward through this. But, there are still too many Members, I'm afraid, who are indulging a double-or-quits approach. They're only willing to vote for their favoured options, rather than the wider options that would enable a consensus to be found to prevent a 'no deal' outcome, and would at least shelter us from the majority of the economic and social damage that a hard ERG Brexit would do. It is entirely clear now that the principal obstacle to finding a widely supported solution is the UK Government. This is a Government that simply won't take 'no' for an answer. A Government that called the vote on Friday not because they had any serious prospects of winning, but because they wanted to be able to blame Parliament for the failure to come to an agreement, rather than their own obstinacy. Ministers more motivated by their own leadership ambitions than what is best for the country's future.
Welsh: Yn ystod y dyddiau diwethaf, rŷm ni wedi gweld ymgais gan y Senedd i geisio llywio'r Deyrnas Unedig o'r moroedd tymhestlog sydd wedi dod yn agos at suddo'n gwlad. Mewn cyfres o bleidleisiau, gwelwyd Tŷ'r Cyffredin yn nesáu'n raddol tuag at weledigaeth wahanol ar gyfer Brexit. Ychydig iawn o amser sydd ar ôl, ond, mewn ychydig ddyddiau, mae'r Aelodau Seneddol wedi llwyddo i gael persbectif sy'n gyffredin i fwy o bobl nag y llwyddodd y Prif Weinidog a'i Chabinet ei wneud mewn bron i dair blynedd. Gadewch imi ddechrau, felly, a hynny'n anarferol, o bosib, drwy dalu teyrnged i rai o'r Aelodau Seneddol sydd wedi rhoi buddiannau eu gwlad o flaen teyrngarwch pleidiol ac wedi mynd ati o ddifrif i geisio dod o hyd i ffordd ymlaen a allai sicrhau mwyafrif yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin, hyd yn oed os yw hynny weithiau'n golygu rhoi eu gyrfaoedd gwleidyddol eu hunain yn y fantol - Aelodau fel Nick Boles ar ochr y Ceidwadwyr, Yvette Cooper a Hilary Benn ar yr ochr Llafur, ac yn wir, Aelodau Plaid Cymru a dynnodd sylw yn ystod y pleidleisio neithiwr at 'Diogelu Dyfodol Cymru', dogfen a gefnogwyd gan y Cynulliad yma fel un ffordd ymlaen drwy hyn oll. Ond mae gormod o Aelodau o hyd, rwy'n ofni, yn chwarae gêm double or quits. Dim ond y dewis y maen nhw'n ei ffafrio y maen nhw'n fodlon pleidleisio drosto, yn hytrach na'r dewisiadau ehangach a fyddai'n arwain at gonsensws i'n hatal rhag ymadael heb gytundeb ac o leiaf yn ein gwarchod rhag y rhan fwyaf o'r niwed economaidd a chymdeithasol a fyddai'n cael ei achosi gan Brexit caled yr ERG. Ac mae'n hollol glir erbyn hyn mai'r prif rwystr i sicrhau datrysiad gyda chefnogaeth eang yw Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig. Llywodraeth yw hon sydd ddim yn fodlon derbyn 'na' fel ateb. Llywodraeth a alwodd y bleidlais ddydd Gwener nid am fod ganddyn nhw unrhyw obaith gwirioneddol o ennill, ond am eu bod eisiau gallu bwrw'r bai ar y Senedd am yr anallu i ddod i gytundeb, yn hytrach nag ar eu hystyfnigrwydd nhw eu hunain. Gweinidogion sy'n meddwl mwy am eu huchelgais arweinyddol eu hunain nag am yr hyn sydd orau i ddyfodol y wlad.