English: Thank you, Dirprwy Lywydd. In your written statement in response to the previous summit, I think you mentioned that the UK Prime Minister had not attended, and he didn't attend again. In fact, I don't think he's ever attended, and I don't think Theresa May attended and neither did David Cameron. You have to go back to Gordon Brown in 2007, I think. I know this because I was reading - . He attended in Belfast at that time and I know this because it's included in Ieuan Wyn Jones's new book, and he was representing the Welsh Government at that summit whilst Rhodri Morgan was recovering from illness. And Gordon Brown only turned up because Ian Paisley and Micheál Martin had threatened to cancel the whole thing if he hadn't done so. So, why do you think that UK Prime Ministers are so unwilling to attend the summit? Isn't it important? Whilst every other Government, as a rule, sends their First Ministers, and in this case the Taoiseach and the Tánaiste, doesn't it at least show some disrespect, if truth be told, to the other Governments that the UK Government isn't represented in the same way? Micheál Martin, the Taoiseach, has put forward some ideas in relation to the council and strengthening the council. I'm wondering whether he shares some of the ideas you have mentioned now, your ideas on reforming the relationship with the parliamentary assembly. There is a different constitutional status to the various members of the council, isn't there? You have the Republic, of course, as an independent nation; you have Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland with their own devolved parliaments; and then you have the Crown dependencies too, which have a status somewhere in between - quite interestingly, outwith the European Union but within the customs union, outside the UK but espousing British identity. That's interesting in the context of the discussions that will come up through the constitutional commission. I wonder whether you had an opportunity during the conversations at the periphery, which can be the most interesting during these sessions, to discuss the constitutional commission and the lessons that can be learned from that range of constitutional models that might be relevant to us. Finally, minority languages was one of the themes discussed. Was there any discussion at all on the pledge by the UK Government to introduce legislation on the Irish language in Northern Ireland following the political crisis in Stormont some years ago? There has been a pledge to legislate before the end of the year, but there are only a few weeks remaining of this year. So, was there anything to report in terms of progress to that end?
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Rwy'n credu, yn eich datganiad ysgrifenedig, wrth ymateb i'r uwchgynhadledd ddiwethaf, roeddech chi wedi cyfeirio at y ffaith bryd hynny nad oedd y Prif Weinidog Prydeinig wedi mynychu. Doedd e ddim wedi mynychu eto, ac, a dweud y gwir, dwi ddim yn credu ei fod e byth wedi mynychu. Doedd Theresa May byth wedi mynychu, David Cameron byth wedi mynychu. Mae'n rhaid ichi fynd nôl i Gordon Brown yn 2007, dwi'n credu. Rwy'n gwybod hyn achos roeddwn i'n darllen - . Roedd e wedi mynychu ym Melffast bryd hynny a dwi'n gwybod hyn achos mae e yn llyfr newydd Ieuan Wyn Jones, a dwi'n credu iddo gynrychioli Llywodraeth Cymru yn yr uwchgynhadledd honno tra oedd Rhodri Morgan yn ymadfer o'i salwch. Fe wnaeth Gordon Brown ddim ond troi lan oherwydd dwi'n credu bod Ian Paisley a Micheál Martin wedi bygwth canslo'r holl beth pe bai e ddim. Pam ŷch chi'n meddwl bod Prif Weinidogion Prydeinig mor amharod i fynychu'r uwchgynhadledd? Hynny yw, onid yw e'n bwysig? Tra bod pob Llywodraeth arall fel arfer yn hala eu Prif Weinidogion nhw, ac yn yr achos yma y Taoiseach a'r Tánaiste, onid yw o leiaf yn dangos amharch, a dweud y gwir, i'r Llywodraethau eraill fod Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Gyfunol ddim yn cael ei chynrychioli yn yr un modd? Mae Micheál Martin, y Taoiseach, wedi cyflwyno rhai syniadau ynglŷn â'r cyngor a chryfhau'r cyngor. Ydyw e wedi rhannu rhai o'r syniadau rŷch chi wedi'u crybwyll nawr, rhai syniadau eich hunain o ran diwygio y berthynas gyda'r corff seneddol cyfochrog? Mae statws cyfansoddiadol gwahanol gan yr amrediad o aelodau o'r cyngor, onid oes e? Mae gennych chi'r Weriniaeth, wrth gwrs, fel gwlad annibynnol; mae gennych chi Ogledd Iwerddon, Cymru a'r Alban, wrth gwrs, gyda'u seneddau datganoledig; ac wedyn mae gennych chi'r Crown dependencies, wrth gwrs, sydd â statws rhywle yn y canol - yn eithaf diddorol, tu fas i'r Undeb Ewropeaidd ond tu fewn i'r undeb tollau, tu fas i'r Deyrnas Gyfunol ac eto yn arddel Prydeindod. Mae hynny'n ddiddorol yng nghyd-destun y trafodaethau ddaw drwy'r comisiwn cyfansoddiadol. Oeddech chi wedi cael cyfle yn ystod y sgyrsiau ar yr ochr, sydd weithiau y rhai mwyaf diddorol yn ystod y sesiynau yma, i drafod y comisiwn cyfansoddiadol a'r gwersi, efallai, o'r amrediad yna o fodelau cyfansoddiadol sydd yn berthnasol i ni? Yn olaf, ieithoedd lleiafrifol oedd un o'r themâu oedd wedi cael eu trafod. Oedd yna drafodaeth o gwbl ynglŷn â'r addewid gan Lywodraeth y Deyrnas Gyfunol i gyflwyno deddfwriaeth ynglŷn â'r iaith Wyddeleg yng Ngogledd Iwerddon yn dilyn yr argyfwng gwleidyddol a fu yn Stormont rai blynyddoedd yn ôl? Mae yna addewid i fod i ddeddfu cyn diwedd y flwyddyn, ond ychydig o wythnosau sydd ar ôl. Oedd yna unrhyw beth i'w adrodd o ran cynnydd i'r perwyl hwnnw?