English: Can I thank Huw Irranca-Davies for that? He makes a very important point. The Gordon Brown report yesterday does indeed propose a legal duty of co-operation between the four nations of the United Kingdom. That legal duty would be something that would be capable of being tested in a court of law, and it would, I believe, act as a very significant brake on the sorts of actions, I'm afraid, we have seen the Home Office take. The Home Office at one point, and actually for quite a long period, kept to an arrangement whereby refugees would only arrive in a local authority area with the prior consent of that local authority. Well, it's abandoned that principle, and not only has it abandoned the principle, but the practice has far too often - well, has too often - been as the Member for Ogmore just suggested. We have had examples very recently in Wales of large groups of refugees arriving at a hotel, certainly no advance notice to the Welsh Government, but no advance notice to local services on the ground either, and that is absolutely unfair to those people who are being asked to live in that place. They are often people who will have health needs, they will have had traumatic experiences, they need services to be provided to them, and unilateral action, simply to move people to an area without any pre-warning, without any preparation, simply isn't fair, either to those services or to the people concerned. And a duty - a legal duty - of the sort that Huw Irranca-Davies set out, and which is, I think, very cogently described in the Gordon Brown report, would prevent that sort of unilateral action from happening.
Welsh: A gaf i ddiolch i Huw Irranca-Davies am hynna? Mae'n gwneud pwynt pwysig iawn. Yn wir, mae adroddiad Gordon Brown ddoe yn cynnig dyletswydd gyfreithiol o gydweithio rhwng pedair gwlad y Deyrnas Unedig. Byddai'r ddyletswydd gyfreithiol honno yn rhywbeth a fyddai'n gallu cael ei phrofi mewn llys barn, a byddai, rwy'n credu, yn gweithredu fel brêc sylweddol iawn ar y mathau o weithredoedd, mae gen i ofn, yr ydym ni wedi gweld y Swyddfa Gartref yn eu cyflawni. Fe wnaeth y Swyddfa Gartref ar un adeg, ac am gyfnod eithaf hir a dweud y gwir, gadw at drefniant lle byddai ffoaduriaid ddim ond yn cyrraedd ardal awdurdod lleol gyda chaniatâd ymlaen llaw yr awdurdod lleol hwnnw. Wel, mae wedi cefnu ar yr egwyddor honno, ac nid yn unig y mae wedi cefnu ar yr egwyddor, ond mae'r arfer yn llawer rhy aml - wel, yn rhy aml - wedi bod fel yr awgrymodd yr Aelod dros Ogwr. Rydym ni wedi cael enghreifftiau yn ddiweddar iawn yng Nghymru o grwpiau mawr o ffoaduriaid yn cyrraedd gwesty, yn sicr dim rhybudd ymlaen llaw i Lywodraeth Cymru, ond dim rhybudd ymlaen llaw i wasanaethau lleol ar lawr gwlad chwaith, ac mae hynny'n gwbl annheg i'r bobl hynny y gofynnir iddyn nhw fyw yn y lle hwnnw. Maen nhw'n aml yn bobl y bydd ganddyn nhw anghenion iechyd, byddan nhw wedi cael profiadau trawmatig, maen nhw angen i wasanaethau gael eu darparu iddyn nhw, ac nid yw gweithredu unochrog, dim ond symud pobl i ardal heb unrhyw rybudd ymlaen llaw, heb unrhyw baratoad, yn deg, i'r gwasanaethau hynny nac i'r bobl dan sylw. A byddai dyletswydd - dyletswydd gyfreithiol - o'r math a nodwyd gan Huw Irranca-Davies, ac sydd, yn fy marn i, yn cael ei ddisgrifio'n effeithiol iawn yn adroddiad Gordon Brown, yn atal y math yna o weithredu unochrog rhag digwydd.