techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I think that's quite right. What we should say, of course, is that we want the power - and it has been given to us - to change the electoral system to any system that the Assembly should vote for, rather than restricting ourselves to one system. What we have at present is a wording that states that we ask Westminster to change the system to a particular model, rather than us having the power to change the system to the system that the National Assembly thinks would be the best for Wales. What the amendment does is to broaden the scope of the motion that we have before us in order to ensure that, yes, the Assembly would decide what kind of system would ultimately be adopted, but without narrowing the debate to considering only one system and saying that we should only consider one system when we ask for the power from Westminster. So, for me, the amendment broadens the powers that the Assembly would have, and, ultimately, it would be up to the Assembly to decide on a cross-party basis what kind of system should be adopted in this Assembly and in local government.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu bod hynny'n iawn. Beth ddylem ni ei ddweud, wrth gwrs, yw ein bod ni eisiau'r pŵer - ac mae hynny wedi cael ei roi i ni - i newid y system etholiadol i unrhyw system mae'r Cynulliad yn pleidleisio drosti, ac nid dim ond un system. Beth sydd gyda ni ar hyn o bryd yw geiriau sydd yn dweud ein bod ni'n gofyn i San Steffan i newid y system i un system yn unigol, ac nid ein bod ni'n gallu newid y system i system y byddai'r Cynulliad Cenedlaethol yn meddwl y byddai'r system orau i Gymru. So, felly, beth mae'r gwelliant yn ei wneud yw ehangu'r geiriau sydd gyda ni o'n blaenau er mwyn sicrhau taw, ie, y Cynulliad fydd yn penderfynu pa fath o system y bydd yn cael ei defnyddio yn y pen draw, ond heb gulhau, wrth gwrs, y ddadl sydd gyda ni ar hyn o bryd, taw dim ond un system y dylem ni ofyn amdani pan fyddwn yn gofyn am y pŵer o San Steffan. So, felly, i fi, mae hwn yn welliant sydd yn ehangu'r pwerau y byddai gan y Cynulliad, ac wrth gwrs, yn y pen draw, y byddai'n lan i'r Cynulliad i benderfynu yn drawsbleidiol pa fath o system y dylai gael ei defnyddio yn y Cynulliad a hefyd gan lywodraeth leol.
English: Thank you. I call on Simon Thomas to reply to the debate. Simon.
Welsh: Diolch. Galwaf ar Simon Thomas i ymateb i'r ddadl. Simon.
English: Thank you very much. The proposal is to agree the motion without amendment. Does any Member object? [Objection.] Thank you. We'll defer this vote, then, until voting time.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Y cynnig yw derbyn y cynnig heb ei ddiwygio. A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? [Gwrthwynebiad.] Diolch. Byddwn yn gohirio'r bleidlais hon, felly, tan y cyfnod pleidleisio.
English: Item 5 on the agenda is the Plaid Cymru debate, the ministerial code, and I call on Dai Lloyd to move the motion.
Welsh: Eitem 5 ar yr agenda yw dadl Plaid Cymru, y cod gweinidogol, a galwaf ar Dai Lloyd i gynnig y cynnig.
English: Thank you. I have selected three amendments to this motion, and I call on the First Minister to move amendment 1, tabled in the name of Jane Hutt.
Welsh: Diolch. Rwyf wedi dethol tri gwelliant i'r cynnig hwn, a galwaf ar y Prif Weinidog i gynnig gwelliant 1, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Jane Hutt.
English: I call on Andrew R.T. Davies to move amendments 2 and 3, tabled in the name of Paul Davies.
Welsh: Galwaf ar Andrew R.T. Davies i gynnig gwelliannau 2 a 3, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Paul Davies.
English: I just want to add one thing to the debate, really, when we talk about ministerial codes and codes of conduct, because, constitutionally, there's one person in this building who is not affected by any of this, and that is the First Minister. Now, in terms of democratic accountability, that cannot be right, because if some of us think that, perhaps, the First Minister may have misled this Chamber in some way, or not, as the case may be, there is no recourse for any Member of this Chamber and there is no recourse for any member of the public to challenge this wrongdoing. So, what we have here, constitutionally - [Interruption.]
Welsh: Rwyf am ychwanegu un peth i'r ddadl, mewn gwirionedd, pan fyddwn yn sôn am godau gweinidogion a chodau ymddygiad, oherwydd, yn gyfansoddiadol, mae un person yn yr adeilad hwn nad effeithir arno gan hyn o gwbl, a'r Prif Weinidog yw hwnnw. Nawr, o ran atebolrwydd democrataidd, ni all hynny fod yn iawn, oherwydd os yw rhai ohonom yn meddwl, efallai, y gallai'r Prif Weinidog fod wedi camarwain y Siambr hon mewn rhyw ffordd, neu beidio, yn ôl y digwydd, nid oes modd i unrhyw aelod o'r Siambr hon ac nid oes modd i unrhyw aelod o'r cyhoedd herio'r camwedd hwn. Felly, yr hyn sydd gennym yma, yn gyfansoddiadol - [Torri ar draws.]
English: Can we just all calm down and listen to what the Member who is on his feet is saying? Then others will get the chance later.
Welsh: A gawn ni i gyd ymdawelu a gwrando ar yr hyn y mae'r Aelod sydd ar ei draed yn ei ddweud? Yna caiff eraill y cyfle yn nes ymlaen.
English: Diolch. What we have here is a democratic Chamber where we all should come and listen to people giving their points of view, no matter what the points of view are, no matter which party, and I ask every single Member to respect that. Right, moving on. So, if there is a dispute, as I mentioned earlier, there is absolutely no recourse for any member of the public, any Member here, and that cannot be right in a democratic chamber. What we have here is a huge, huge constitutional gap, where, potentially, any First Minister can come here and say what the hell he or she likes - anything at all. There is absolutely no recourse for anybody here. That cannot be right. So, what I'd like to finally say is that, as well as ministerial codes and as well as codes of conduct for Members, what we need here is a way to hold the First Minister to account constitutionally, because I know from my experience, both as a Member of the public and as a Member of this Chamber, that there is no way of doing that. Any First Minister can come here and they can potentially mislead this Chamber; they can potentially lie and there's nothing we can do about it. That is not right.
Welsh: Diolch. Yr hyn sydd gennym yma yw Siambr ddemocrataidd lle y dylem i gyd ddod a gwrando ar bobl yn rhoi eu safbwyntiau, ni waeth beth yw'r safbwyntiau, ni waeth pa blaid, a gofynnaf i bob un o'r Aelodau barchu hynny. Iawn, gan symud ymlaen. Felly, os oes anghydfod, fel y soniais yn gynharach, nid oes gan unrhyw aelod o'r cyhoedd, nac unrhyw Aelod yma, fodd o herio, ac ni all hynny fod yn iawn mewn siambr ddemocrataidd. Yr hyn sydd gennym yma yw bwlch cyfansoddiadol enfawr, lle y gall unrhyw Brif Weinidog ddod yma, o bosibl, a dweud beth bynnag y mae ef neu hi'n dymuno'i ddweud - unrhyw beth o gwbl. Nid oes gan unrhyw un yma fodd o'i herio. Ni all hynny fod yn iawn. Felly, yn olaf, hoffwn ddweud mai'r hyn sydd ei angen arnom yma, yn ogystal â chodau'r gweinidogion a chodau ymddygiad i'r Aelodau, yw ffordd o ddwyn y Prif Weinidog i gyfrif yn gyfansoddiadol, gan fy mod yn gwybod o fy mhrofiad innau, fel Aelod o'r cyhoedd ac fel Aelod o'r Siambr hon, nad oes unrhyw ffordd o wneud hynny. Gall unrhyw Brif Weinidog ddod yma ac mae'n bosibl iddynt gamarwain y Siambr hon; mae'n bosibl iddynt ddweud celwydd ac nid oes unrhyw beth y gallwn ei wneud am y peth. Nid yw hynny'n iawn.
English: I have finished.
Welsh: Rwyf wedi gorffen.
English: I would ask you to just think about that last sentence and whether you could change the wording in that last sentence. Nobody lies in this Chamber while I'm in the chair.
Welsh: Hoffwn ofyn i chi feddwl am y frawddeg olaf ac a fyddai modd i chi newid y geiriad yn y frawddeg olaf honno. Nid oes neb yn dweud celwydd yn y Siambr hon tra rwyf fi yn y gadair.
English: What I did say, to qualify, was 'potentially' - 'potential untruths', shall we say? I don't know. I'll go with your guidance, Chair.
Welsh: Yr hyn a ddywedais, i fod yn glir, oedd 'ei bod hi'n bosibl iddynt' - 'anwireddau posibl', gawn ni ddweud? Nid wyf yn gwybod. Gwnaf yn ôl eich arweiniad, Gadeirydd.
English: Okay, we'll check the Record. First Minister.
Welsh: Iawn, fe edrychwn ar y Cofnod. Brif Weinidog.
English: I take the response that the First Minister has given. I take that point that it's not a situation that occurs in Westminster, namely confirmation hearings, but don't you think that we shouldn't always try and replicate what Westminster do? This would be groundbreaking, because they are an important part of the Government architecture, special advisers are, and having a form of confirmation hearing would bring public awareness to the role that they fulfil in advising Ministers.
Welsh: Rwy'n derbyn yr ymateb y mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi'i roi. Rwy'n derbyn y pwynt nad yw'n sefyllfa sy'n digwydd yn San Steffan, sef gwrandawiadau cadarnhau, ond onid ydych yn credu na ddylem geisio ailadrodd yr hyn a wna San Steffan bob amser? Byddai hyn yn torri tir newydd, oherwydd bod cynghorwyr arbennig yn rhan bwysig o bensaernïaeth y Llywodraeth, a byddai cael math o wrandawiad cadarnhau yn codi ymwybyddiaeth y cyhoedd ynglŷn â'r rôl y maent yn ei chyflawni wrth gynghori Gweinidogion.
English: My answer to that is: if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Special advisers have never been called into question in terms of their behaviour. They are indeed expected to behave in accordance with their own code. I see no reason why there should be hearings for the appointment of special advisers. In terms of the third amendment in the name of Paul Davies, this is a mischievous amendment, let's be honest, as the party opposite well knows. There are Members here who will know that, where I take the view that the ministerial code has been breached, then action is taken. I don't think that I can be accused of doing nothing if there are issues that need to be dealt with. Those decisions have been difficult and painful for all involved, but nevertheless it has been important to take those decisions. The suggestion is that somehow no decisions are ever taken in terms of breaches of the ministerial code. Members know otherwise. Besides, I know that the Cabinet Secretary for Education can act, now that she is in Government, as a guardian in terms of this in any event. I have no doubt at all that, when it comes to the Government that we have set up in the last few weeks, the ministerial code will be adhered to. All Ministers have been made absolutely aware of the code and have been informed that they must read the code as well.
Welsh: Fy ateb i hynny yw: pam newid rhywbeth sy'n gweithio? Ni fu amheuaeth erioed ynglŷn ag ymddygiad cynghorwyr arbennig. Disgwylir iddynt ymddwyn yn unol â'u cod eu hunain. Ni welaf unrhyw reswm pam y dylid cael gwrandawiadau ar gyfer penodi cynghorwyr arbennig. O ran y trydydd gwelliant yn enw Paul Davies, mae hwn yn welliant drygionus, gadewch i ni fod yn onest, fel y mae'r blaid gyferbyn yn gwybod yn iawn. Mae yna Aelodau yma a fydd yn gwybod y rhoddir camau ar waith lle rwyf fi o'r farn fod cod y gweinidogion wedi'i dorri. Nid wyf yn meddwl y gellir fy nghyhuddo o wneud dim byd os oes yna faterion sy'n galw am sylw. Mae'r penderfyniadau hynny wedi bod yn anodd ac yn boenus i bawb a oedd ynghlwm wrthynt, ond serch hynny mae'n bwysig fod y penderfyniadau hynny wedi'u gwneud. Yr awgrym yw na wneir unrhyw benderfyniadau byth mewn perthynas ag achosion o dorri cod y gweinidogion. Gŵyr yr Aelodau fel arall. Beth bynnag, rwy'n gwybod y gall Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Addysg, gan ei bod yn rhan o'r Llywodraeth bellach, weithredu fel gwarcheidwad yn hyn o beth. Nid oes gennyf unrhyw amheuaeth o gwbl y caiff cod y gweinidogion ei ddilyn gan y Llywodraeth a sefydlwyd gennym yn yr ychydig wythnosau diwethaf. Mae pob Gweinidog yn gwbl ymwybodol o'r cod ac wedi cael gwybod bod yn rhaid iddynt ddarllen y cod hefyd.
English: Just on that point, could you therefore confirm that all your Cabinet Secretaries and Ministers have signed the ministerial code? Did the Cabinet Secretary for Education give her views to you on the ministerial code?
Welsh: Ar y pwynt hwnnw, a allwch gadarnhau felly fod holl Ysgrifenyddion a Gweinidogion eich Cabinet wedi arwyddo cod y gweinidogion? A fynegodd Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Addysg ei barn wrthych am god y gweinidogion?
English: The answer is 'yes' and she did, as she's just informed you. As all Ministers are bound by the ministerial code there is no question of them being able to pick and choose, and there never has been. That code will apply to all and it is known what the consequences are if the code is broken. Well, I won't comment much on what the Member Neil McEvoy said. His obsessions are well known to this Chamber. He has his own furrow that he wishes to plough. He was not brave enough to make any allegations and, therefore, his comments in this Chamber are not worthy of a response. So, with regard to amendment 1, as I say, that is something - [Interruption.] You've had your view. That is something that I've already formally moved. We will not be supporting amendments 2 and 3, nor indeed the motion itself as unamended.
Welsh: Yr ateb yw 'gallaf' a do, fe wnaeth, fel y mae hi newydd ddweud wrthych. Gan fod yr holl Weinidogion wedi'u rhwymo gan god y gweinidogion, nid oes unrhyw fodd iddynt allu dewis a dethol, ac ni fu erioed. Bydd y cod hwnnw'n berthnasol i bawb ac mae'n hysbys beth yw'r canlyniadau os torrir y cod. Wel, ni wnaf lawer o sylwadau ar yr hyn a ddywedodd yr Aelod Neil McEvoy. Mae ei obsesiynau'n hysbys i'r Siambr hon. Mae ganddo ei gŵys ei hun y mae'n dymuno ei thorri. Nid oedd yn ddigon dewr i wneud unrhyw honiadau ac felly, nid yw ei sylwadau yn y Siambr hon yn haeddu ymateb. Felly, o ran gwelliant 1, fel y dywedais, mae hynny'n rhywbeth - [Torri ar draws.] Rydych wedi cael eich cyfle i ddweud eich barn. Mae hwnnw'n rhywbeth rwyf eisoes wedi'i gynnig yn ffurfiol. Ni fyddwn yn cefnogi gwelliannau 2 a 3, nac yn wir y cynnig ei hun heb ei ddiwygio.
English: Thank you very much. I call on Dai Lloyd to reply to the debate. Dai.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Galwaf ar Dai Lloyd i ymateb i'r ddadl. Dai.
English: Thank you very much, Deputy Presiding Officer. May I thank everybody else for their contributions? Just to return to the nub of the debate, a number of different principles have succeeded in creeping into the debate, but the fundamental point was regarding the ministerial code. We call for the principles of open government to be maintained. People have said some very nice things about that standard, and we want to see it upheld, and we want to see the ministerial code being laid before this Assembly and being approved by this Assembly. We also call for an independent adjudicator to be appointed to report publicly on any alleged breaches of the code. That, basically, is the point of this debate, in order to persuade and convince the public that we are responding affirmatively and positively to what happened in the referendum last week. We must have a strong response to show that we as politicians are standing up for the right things. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Ddirprwy Lywydd, a diolch i bawb am eu cyfraniadau. Jest i fynd yn ôl at bwynt ein dadl, wrth gwrs, mae yna sawl gwahanol egwyddor wedi llwyddo i gropian i mewn i'r ddadl yma, ond mi wnawn ni fynd yn ôl at y pwynt sylfaenol a oedd ynglŷn â'r cod gweinidogol. Rydym ni'n galw yn naturiol ar holl egwyddorion llywodraeth agored gael eu cynnal. Mae pobl wedi dweud pethau neis am y safon yna. Rydym ni eisiau ei gweld hi'n cael ei chwblhau. Rydym eisiau gweld hefyd y cod gweinidogol yn cael ei osod gerbron y Cynulliad yma a chael ei gymeradwyo gan y Cynulliad yma, ac rydym hefyd yn galw am benodi dyfarnwr annibynnol i adrodd yn gyhoeddus ar unrhyw achosion o dorri'r cod. Dyna, yn y bôn, ydy pwynt y ddadl yma, er mwyn ceisio argyhoeddi'r cyhoedd ein bod yn ymateb yn gadarn i beth ddigwyddodd yn yr etholiad yna, y refferendwm, yr wythnos diwethaf. Mae'n rhaid cael ymateb cryf a rhaid dangos ein bod ni fel gwleidyddion yn gallu sefyll lan am beth sydd yn iawn. Diolch yn fawr.
English: Thank you very much. The proposal is to agree the motion without amendment. Does any Member object? [Objection.] Object. Thank you. Therefore, we will defer this item until voting time.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Y cynnig yw derbyn y cynnig heb ei ddiwygio. A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? [Gwrthwynebiad.] Gwrthwynebiad. Diolch. Felly, gohiriwn yr eitem hon tan y cyfnod pleidleisio.
English: The next item on the agenda, then, is item 6, which is the Welsh Conservative debate on air pollution. I call on David Melding to move the motion. David.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf ar yr agenda, felly, yw eitem 6, sef dadl y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig ar lygredd aer. Galwaf ar David Melding i gynnig y cynnig. David.
English: Thank you for taking the intervention. It's actually 9.5 on, I think, a scale of 10. There's a scale that is allocated, and 9.5 is in that scale. So, it's the highest value.
Welsh: Diolch i chi am gymryd yr ymyriad. 9.5 ar raddfa o 10 ydyw, rwy'n meddwl. Ceir graddfa a ddyrennir, ac mae'n 9.5 ar y raddfa honno. Felly, dyna'r gwerth uchaf.
English: Thank you. I have selected the two amendments to the motion. I call on Simon Thomas to move both amendments - 1 and 2 - tabled in his name. Simon.
Welsh: Diolch. Rwyf wedi dethol y ddau welliant i'r cynnig. Galwaf ar Simon Thomas i gynnig y ddau welliant - 1 a 2 - a gyflwynwyd yn ei enw. Simon.
English: Thank you. David Rees.
Welsh: Diolch. David Rees.
English: Perhaps I should declare an interest in supporting amendment 1, having received very recently the dreaded letter from Volkswagen in respect of my own car. If I leave open my bedroom window in my Swansea home overnight, I'll be waking up with a good old smoker's cough, except, of course, it's not a smoker's cough, is it, it's a Port Talbot cough. It's brought to me across the bay from a part of my region -
Welsh: Efallai y dylwn ddatgan diddordeb mewn cefnogi gwelliant 1, ar ôl cael y llythyr a ofnwyd gan Volkswagen yn ddiweddar mewn perthynas â fy nghar fy hun. Os byddaf yn gadael ffenestr fy ystafell wely ar agor dros nos yn fy nghartref yn Abertawe, byddaf yn deffro gyda pheswch smygu, ond wrth gwrs, nid peswch smygu ydyw, peswch Port Talbot ydyw. Mae'n fy nghyrraedd ar draws y bae o ran o fy rhanbarth -
English: Yes, by all means.
Welsh: Gwnaf, ar bob cyfrif.
English: Are you defending the bad air?
Welsh: A ydych yn amddiffyn yr aer drwg?
English: I will defend the bad air in the sense that, clearly, there are very few occasions when the wind is blowing in the direction of Swansea; it mostly actually comes off the coast into Port Talbot.
Welsh: Rwy'n amddiffyn yr aer drwg yn yr ystyr fod yna nifer fechan iawn o achlysuron pan fydd y gwynt yn chwythu i gyfeiriad Abertawe; daw'n bennaf oddi ar yr arfordir i Bort Talbot.
English: The focus this afternoon in this debate seems to have been mainly on cars, industry and individuals, and of course sensible efforts to reduce emissions from these sources are to be commended. However, there's a far bigger polluter than cars or people. There are approximately 90,000 cargo ships on the world's seas. They burn 7.29 million barrels a day of the dirtiest and most polluting fuel left over from the oil refining process. The stuff is so dirty and heavy that you can walk on it when it's cold. Cargo ships produce 260 times the pollution of the world's cars each year. Because of that, Wales and the UK could shut down every facility producing carbon and other pollutants and take every car off the road and it wouldn't even dent the amount of air pollution being created by these cargo ships. Air pollution is a global problem and Wales and the UK need to work with the IMO and other global bodies to encourage the development and introduction of alternative means of fuelling these cargo ships or reducing the pollution in other ways, such as requiring cargo ships to be equipped with technology such as scrubbers, catalytic conversion and developing alternative energy sources. Otherwise we're just trying to empty an ocean with a thimble.
Welsh: Ymddengys bod ffocws y ddadl y prynhawn yma ar geir, diwydiant ac unigolion, yn bennaf, ac wrth gwrs dylid canmol ymdrechion synhwyrol i leihau allyriadau o'r ffynonellau hyn. Fodd bynnag, mae yna un llygrwr sy'n llawer mwy na cheir neu bobl. Ceir oddeutu 90,000 o longau cargo ar foroedd y byd. Maent yn llosgi 7.29 miliwn o gasgenni y dydd o'r tanwydd butraf a mwyaf llygrol a adewir dros ben o'r broses puro olew. Mae'r peth mor fudr a thrwm fel y gallwch gerdded arno pan fo'n oer. Mae llongau cargo yn cynhyrchu 260 gwaith y llygredd sy'n cael ei gynhyrchu o geir yn y byd bob blwyddyn. Oherwydd hynny, gallai Cymru a'r DU gau pob cyfleuster sy'n cynhyrchu carbon a llygryddion eraill a thynnu pob car oddi ar y ffordd ac ni fyddai hyd yn oed yn creu tolc o ran faint o lygredd aer sy'n cael ei greu gan y llongau cargo hyn. Mae llygredd aer yn broblem fyd-eang ac mae angen i Gymru a'r DU weithio gyda'r Sefydliad Morol Rhyngwladol a chyrff byd-eang eraill i annog gwaith ar ddatblygu a chyflwyno tanwydd amgen ar gyfer y llongau cargo hyn neu leihau'r llygredd mewn ffyrdd eraill, megis ei gwneud yn ofynnol i longau cargo gario offer technolegol megis sgwrwyr, cyfarpar trosi catalytig a datblygu ffynonellau ynni amgen. Fel arall, rydym yn ceisio gwagio'r cefnfor â gwniadur.
English: Can I just make the point that you had the opportunity to object to that Chair yesterday; today -
Welsh: A gaf fi wneud y pwynt eich bod wedi cael cyfle i wrthwynebu'r Cadeirydd hwnnw ddoe; heddiw -
English: I'm referencing it, Llywydd. I'll move on. I would agree with this motion that it is beholden on the Welsh Government and all of us to safeguard the quality of life of our planet and to ensure that the people of Wales enjoy the highest standards of air quality.
Welsh: Cyfeirio ato rwyf fi, Lywydd. Fe symudaf ymlaen. Byddwn yn cytuno â'r cynnig hwn ei bod yn ddyletswydd ar Lywodraeth Cymru a phob un ohonom i ddiogelu ansawdd bywyd ein planed ac i sicrhau bod pobl Cymru yn mwynhau ansawdd aer o'r safon uchaf.
English: As my colleague said earlier, the World Health Organization states that 29,000 people in the UK are affected by premature deaths due to air pollution, and 1,500 by road accidents. Listening to what has been said around the Chamber in this debate is very worrying, and it's good to hear the warm words from every AM. But, I think probably part of the reason I'm stood here now, actually, is the huge contradiction between the warm words in this Chamber from the Labour Members and the reality and results of their policies. Just for a change, I'll talk about Cardiff's local development plan and other local development plans in my constituency, because what the Labour Party in the City of Cardiff Council, here, what you - . [Interruption.] I'll give way.
Welsh: Fel y dywedodd fy nghyd-Aelod yn gynharach, mae Sefydliad Iechyd y Byd yn datgan bod 29,000 o bobl yn y DU yn marw yn gynamserol o ganlyniad i lygredd aer, a 1,500 yn marw o ganlyniad i ddamweiniau ffordd. Mae gwrando ar yr hyn a ddywedwyd o gwmpas y Siambr yn y ddadl hon yn peri pryder mawr, ac mae'n dda clywed geiriau brwd gan bob AC. Ond rwy'n credu mai rhan o'r rheswm rwy'n sefyll yma yn awr yn ôl pob tebyg yw'r gwrthgyferbyniad enfawr rhwng y geiriau brwd yn y Siambr hon gan yr Aelodau Llafur a realiti a chanlyniadau eu polisïau mewn gwirionedd. Am newid, fe siaradaf am gynllun datblygu lleol Caerdydd a chynlluniau datblygu lleol eraill yn fy etholaeth, oherwydd yr hyn y mae'r Blaid Lafur yng Nghyngor Dinas Caerdydd, yma, yr hyn rydych chi - . [Torri ar draws.] Fe ildiaf.