English: Thank you very much for the statement. I was just listening carefully to what you've been saying and I also think we do need to think about the sustainability of what we're doing, because dignity is fantastically important and we need to ensure that everybody has the period products they need to deal with their monthly periods, but we also have to think about the environment and how we can promote reusable products where appropriate. I was talking to somebody in one of the poorer parts of my constituency the other day and she pointed out that you're only allowed to go to the foodbank three times, I think, so although you might be able to pick up some non-reusable period products, it won't get you through if you can't actually go back. So, I just wondered how much work is being done on promoting Mooncups for those women who are sexually active - I wouldn't give a Mooncup to an 11-year-old who had just got their first period - but also to reusable pants and pads so that the people who do need to get help financially with their period products actually still have them in month four and month five. Obviously, this has an implication, for example, in how we design our school toilets, as Sioned Williams has already talked about so visibly. We need to ensure that in every secondary school, and in the older age groups in primary schools, there is access to toilets with a hand-wash basin built into the toilet so that people can change their products with dignity. I think it's fantastic that we're having this conversation here this afternoon, because I was just looking up an early day motion that was written in the House of Commons in January 2021 in response to the fact that VAT has been lifted on tampons and throwaway pads but not on the reusable ones. Only 31 people in the whole of the House of Commons, including, I have to say, one of the initiators, Jim Shannon, Democratic Unionist Party, good man - . Why is it that out of 630 Members of Parliament, only 31 of them think that this is an important issue? I just wondered what conversations you might have had with the UK Government to try and get them to see the thing holistically and to ensure that we're removing VAT on the reusable products as well, because they're the ones we want most people to be using. They're not suitable for somebody who's camping or in temporary accommodation and who hasn't got a washing machine, but for other people they're absolutely the right thing to do.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr am y datganiad. Roeddwn i'n gwrando'n astud ar yr hyn yr ydych chi wedi bod yn ei ddweud ac rwy'n credu hefyd fod angen i ni feddwl am gynaliadwyedd yr hyn yr ydym yn ei wneud, oherwydd bod urddas yn eithriadol o bwysig ac mae angen i ni sicrhau bod gan bawb y cynhyrchion mislif sydd eu hangen arnyn nhw i ymdrin â'u mislif misol, ond mae'n rhaid i ni hefyd feddwl am yr amgylchedd a sut y gallwn hyrwyddo cynhyrchion y gellir eu hailddefnyddio lle bo'n briodol. Roeddwn i'n siarad â rhywun yn un o rannau tlotach fy etholaeth i y diwrnod o'r blaen a nododd mai dim ond tair gwaith y caniateir i chi fynd i'r banc bwyd, rwy'n credu, felly er y gallech gasglu rhywfaint o gynhyrchion mislif na ellir eu hailddefnyddio, ni fyddan nhw'n ddigonol os na chewch chi fynd yn ôl. Felly, roeddwn i'n meddwl tybed faint o waith sy'n cael ei wneud ar hyrwyddo'r 'Mooncup' ar gyfer y menywod hynny sy'n weithredol yn rhywiol - ni fyddwn yn rhoi 'Mooncup' i ferch 11 oed a oedd newydd gael ei mislif cyntaf - ond hefyd nicers a phadiau y gellir eu hailddefnyddio fel bod gan y bobl y mae angen cymorth ariannol arnyn nhw gyda'u cynhyrchion mislif rai ar gyfer mis pedwar a mis pump. Yn amlwg, mae gan hyn oblygiadau, er enghraifft, o ran sut yr ydym yn cynllunio toiledau ein hysgolion, fel y mae Sioned Williams wedi sôn amdano eisoes mewn modd mor amlwg. Mae angen i ni sicrhau, ym mhob ysgol uwchradd, ac yn y grwpiau oedran hŷn mewn ysgolion cynradd, fod mynediad i doiledau gyda basn golchi dwylo wedi'i gynnwys yn y ciwbicl fel y gall pobl newid eu cynhyrchion ag urddas. Rwy'n credu ei bod yn wych ein bod yn cael y sgwrs hon yma y prynhawn yma, oherwydd roeddwn i'n edrych ar gynnig cynnar a ysgrifennwyd yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin ym mis Ionawr 2021 mewn ymateb i'r ffaith bod TAW wedi ei dileu ar damponau a phadiau untro ond nid ar y rhai y gellir eu hailddefnyddio. Dim ond 31 o bobl yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin i gyd, gan gynnwys, mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, un o'r rhai y tu ôl i'r cynnig, Jim Shannon, Plaid yr Unoliaethwyr Democrataidd, dyn da - . Pam mai dim ond 31 o 630 o Aelodau Seneddol oedd yn credu bod hwn yn fater pwysig? Roeddwn i'n meddwl tybed pa sgyrsiau y gallech chi fod wedi eu cael gyda Llywodraeth y DU i geisio eu cael nhw i weld y peth yn gyfannol ac i sicrhau ein bod yn cael gwared ar TAW ar y cynhyrchion y gellir eu hailddefnyddio hefyd, oherwydd y rhain yw'r rhai yr ydym ni eisiau i'r rhan fwyaf o bobl eu defnyddio. Nid ydyn nhw'n addas ar gyfer rhywun sy'n gwersylla neu mewn llety dros dro nad oes modd iddyn nhw ddefnyddio peiriant golchi, ond i bobl eraill maen nhw'n hollol addas.