English: We greatly regret this decision. In the First Minister's selective boasts about the Welsh economy just now, he didn't refer to Wales having the lowest wages of all the nations and regions of the UK. He had the opportunity today to do something to relieve the pinch-point that is strangling two thirds of the Welsh economy that relies, to some degree or other, on the M4 to get its products to market. Does he really believe that saying he's going to do something to expedite dealing with accidents and educate people more about avoiding accidents, or setting up another commission - that that's really an adequate response to the scale of the problem? I do welcome him saying he'll listen to all voices, and I do hope as part of that he'll listen to David Rowlands, our spokesperson, on quite a lot of the detailed work that he has done around this. The decision letter - you say at paragraph 4.3 that there were nine matters you had regard to. You then mention another three matters at paragraph 4.4. I just wondered if I can ask: is there another document whether you paid any regard to at all, and that document is the Labour manifesto, which said, 'We will deliver a relief road for the M4'. Now, you say at the end of your decision letter that - [ Interruption.] You say at the end of your decision letter: 'My decisions may only be challenged by way of a claim for judicial review.' First Minister, don't you think that your decision may be something that voters may have a view on, given that very clear promise you made in your manifesto, which you've now broken? Now, you speak about the timeline, First Minister. You say that, in 2014, no-one had thought of Brexit. It was in January 2014 that David Cameron made his Bloomberg speech saying there would be an in/out referendum. You talk about this timeline. This poor inspector, he was there from February 2017 to September 2018. He had 83 sitting days of evidence. He was told by the Welsh Government - the First Minister, Carwyn Jones, finance Minister, Mark Drakeford - that the funds would be available to fund this. He did all this work on that basis - spent 44 million quid on that basis - yet then you're told, not before 29 April, that, actually, that's all wrong. So, First Minister, on your evidence, you spent three months looking at this report, doing all this work, giving it such extraordinary consideration in such amazing detail, but then on 29 April it was all to no avail because your Cabinet told you, actually, the money's not available. Is that really a credible basis? Can we really believe that you proceeded on that basis? Finally, I'd like to draw some attention to an inconsistency between your decision letter and what you said just now. Your decision letter mentions only one environmental factor, and that was the Gwent levels - perhaps 2 per cent directly affected by the road, but you put such a different emphasis and judgment on that, compared to the inspector, that that's what drives it. But what you said in your statement just now was, 'Oh, it was the committee for climate change, it was net zero' - it was because you've declared a climate change emergency, notwithstanding that you told us it was only declaratory and wouldn't lead to a change of policy last time. Why is it that you're putting such emphasis on climate change in your statement today but not in your decision notice, and what impact does it have on the climate when you have these vast amounts of congestion of cars pushing out carbon dioxide and other emissions, which would be rather less if those cars were actually moving rather than just stuck there with their engines running? What, finally, about the people of Newport who suffer that air pollution, the particulates and the nitrogen dioxide near those tunnels, that's going to get worse and worse for them, along with this pinch-point getting worse and worse for the Welsh economy?
Welsh: Mae'r penderfyniad hwn yn un gresynus iawn yn ein golwg ni. Wrth i'r Prif Weinidog glochdar, yn ofalus ei ddewis, am economi Cymru nawr, ni chyfeiriodd at y ffaith mai yng Nghymru y ceir y cyflogau isaf ym mhob un o wledydd a rhanbarthau'r DU. Roedd ganddo'r cyfle heddiw i wneud rhywbeth i leddfu'r gwasgbwynt sy'n tagu dwy ran o dair o economi Cymru sy'n dibynnu, i ryw raddau, ar yr M4 i gael ei chynnyrch i'r farchnad. A yw'n credu mewn gwirionedd bod dweud ei fod yn mynd i wneud rhywbeth i hwyluso'r gwaith o ymdrin â damweiniau a dysgu mwy i bobl am sut i osgoi damweiniau, neu sefydlu comisiwn arall - bod hynny'n ymateb digonol i faint y broblem? Rwy'n croesawu iddo ddweud y bydd yn gwrando ar bob llais, ac rwy'n gobeithio y bydd, fel rhan o hynny, yn gwrando ar David Rowlands, ein llefarydd ni, am y gwaith manwl y mae ef wedi ei wneud yn hyn o beth. Y llythyr penderfyniad - rydych chi'n dweud ym mharagraff 4.3 fod yna naw mater yr oeddech chi'n eu hystyried. Rydych chi'n sôn wedyn am dri mater arall ym mharagraff 4.4. Tybed a gaf i ofyn: a oes dogfen arall y rhoesoch chi sylw iddi o gwbl, a maniffesto'r Blaid Lafur yw'r ddogfen honno, a oedd yn dweud, 'Fe fyddwn ni'n cwblhau ffordd liniaru'r M4'. Nawr, rydych chi'n dweud ar ddiwedd eich llythyr penderfyniad - [ Torri ar draws.] Rydych chi'n dweud ar ddiwedd eich llythyr penderfyniad: 'Dim ond trwy wneud cais am adolygiad barnwrol y ceir herio fy mhenderfyniadau.' Prif Weinidog, onid ydych chi'n credu y gallai eich penderfyniad chi fod yn rhywbeth y gallai pleidleiswyr fod â barn amdano, o ystyried yr addewid glir iawn a wnaethoch chi yn eich maniffesto, yr ydych chi wedi ei thorri erbyn hyn? Nawr, rydych chi'n sôn am yr amserlen, Prif Weinidog. Rydych chi'n dweud, yn 2014, nad oedd neb wedi meddwl am Brexit. Yn Ionawr 2014 y gwnaeth David Cameron draddodi ei araith Bloomberg yn dweud y byddai refferendwm ar aros neu adael. Rydych chi'n sôn am y llinell amser. Yr arolygwr druan, roedd yno rhwng Chwefror 2017 a Medi 2018. Roedd ganddo 83 o ddiwrnodau yn eistedd ac yn gwrando ar dystiolaeth. Dywedwyd wrtho gan Lywodraeth Cymru - y Prif Weinidog, Carwyn Jones, y Gweinidog cyllid, Mark Drakeford - y byddai'r arian ar gael i ariannu hyn. Cyflawnodd yr holl waith ar y sail honno - gwariodd 44 miliwn o bunnoedd ar y sail honno - eto i gyd, dywedwyd wrthoch, nid cyn 29 o fis Ebrill, fod hynny, yn wir, yn gwbl anghywir. Felly, Prif Weinidog, yn ôl eich tystiolaeth chi, fe wnaethoch dreulio tri mis yn edrych ar yr adroddiad hwn, yn gwneud yr holl waith hwn, gan roi ystyriaeth anhygoel iddo mewn manylder rhyfeddol. Ond yna ar 29 Ebrill aeth y cyfan yn ofer gan fod eich Cabinet wedi dweud wrthoch nad yw'r arian ar gael. A yw honno'n sail gredadwy mewn gwirionedd? A ydym ni i gredu o ddifrif eich bod wedi bwrw ymlaen ar y sail honno? Yn olaf, hoffwn dynnu rhywfaint o sylw at yr anghysondeb rhwng eich llythyr penderfyniad a'r hyn yr oeddech chi'n ei ddweud gynnau. Mae eich llythyr penderfyniad yn sôn am un ffactor amgylcheddol yn unig, sef gwastadeddau Gwent - dim ond 2 y cant o'r gwastadeddau sy'n cael eu heffeithio'n uniongyrchol gan y ffordd. Rydych chi'n rhoi pwyslais a barn mor wahanol arno, o'i gymharu â'r arolygydd, o ran mai hyn sy'n ei ysgogi. Ond yr hyn a wnaethoch ei ddweud yn eich datganiad nawr oedd, 'O, y pwyllgor ar newid hinsawdd oedd hynny, Net Zero oedd hynny' - roedd hynny oherwydd eich bod wedi datgan argyfwng newid hinsawdd, er i chi ddweud wrthym ni'r tro diwethaf mai datganiad yn unig oedd hyn ac na fyddai'n arwain at newid polisi. Pam ydych chi'n rhoi cymaint o bwyslais ar newid hinsawdd yn eich datganiad heddiw ond nid yn yr hysbysiad o'ch penderfyniad? A pha effaith a gaiff ar yr hinsawdd pan fo'r niferoedd enfawr hyn o gerbydau mewn tagfeydd yn pwmpio carbon deuocsid ac allyriadau eraill, a fyddai gryn dipyn yn llai pe bai'r ceir hynny'n symud yn hytrach nag yn aros yno gyda'u peiriannau ymlaen? Ac yn olaf, beth am bobl Casnewydd sy'n dioddef y llygredd aer hwnnw, y gronynnau a'r nitrogen deuocsid gerllaw'r twneli hynny, sy'n mynd yn waeth ac yn waeth, ynghyd â'r gwasgbwynt hwn sy'n mynd yn waeth ac yn waeth i economi Cymru?