English: Thank you very much for that, Cabinet Secretary, because it is a sad day for a very well-established business with an excellent reputation. Twenty-six years and 165 employees, the loss of the company carries not just financial consequences, but the human cost is tangible. Now, I've spoken to the founder and managing director, I've spoken to operational staff and to workers in the field, and the sense of shock and disbelief is overwhelming. I do understand that there is much we cannot discuss, as the administrator is still evaluating the situation, and the questions I raise with you I've already raised in part with them. However, I would like your thoughts and commitment to ensuring the following: 77 employees work on a maintenance contract at the local refinery. This contract is going to be taken over by another established maintenance business. Will you ensure that support is given to both Main Port and the new company, so that those 77 employees can be transferred with the full protection of TUPE legislation, quickly and efficiently, because this will secure not just their jobs but also continuity of service for the customer and enable another local company to develop their business? The same goes for an additional five members of Main Port who are transferring to a second company for a second local maintenance contract. Given the impact of the closure of Murco, and I think it's very clear that, as one of their major customers, Murco going into liquidation or closing down was a real body blow. Are you able to offer the same level of additional help and support that Murco employees received to the remaining 83 Main Port staff? I do wonder, Cabinet Secretary, if you are able to examine the role that Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs played in this. The company are clear that they had no notice as to the winding-up order issued by HMRC. There was an ongoing dispute that appears to have been over a number of years, and, although the bulk of the debt was relatively recent, the company were in the process of putting together an official payment plan. And, to be frank, this action: nobody is a winner. HMRC aren't going to get their money either. Finally, will you please examine whether the long-term financial viability of the company was properly examined by Welsh Government officials before the £650,000 grant was made available? I do acknowledge that business can be a risky enterprise, but, given the size of the debt and the loss of their major customer prior to that grant being awarded, I would wish the public to be satisfied that due diligence was undertaken rigorously. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn am hynna, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, oherwydd mae'n ddiwrnod trist i fusnes sefydledig iawn ag iddo enw da rhagorol. Chwe blynedd ar hugain a 165 o weithwyr; mae colli'r cwmni hwn yn gost ddynol wirioneddol, yn ogystal ag achosi goblygiadau ariannol. Nawr, rwyf wedi siarad â'r sylfaenydd a'r rheolwr gyfarwyddwr, rwyf wedi siarad â staff gweithredol ac â gweithwyr yn y maes, ac mae'r ymdeimlad o sioc ac anghrediniaeth yn llethol. Rwy'n deall bod llawer nad ydym yn gallu ei drafod, gan fod y gweinyddwr yn dal i werthuso'r sefyllfa, ac mae'r cwestiynau yr wyf yn eu gofyn i chi yn rhai yr wyf eisoes wedi eu gofyn yn rhannol iddyn nhw. Fodd bynnag, hoffwn eich meddyliau a'ch ymrwymiad i sicrhau'r canlynol: mae 77 o weithwyr yn gweithio ar gontract cynnal a chadw yn y burfa leol. Bydd y contract hwn yn cael ei gymryd drosodd gan fusnes cynnal a chadw sefydledig arall. A wnewch chi sicrhau bod cefnogaeth yn cael ei rhoi i Main Port ac i'r cwmni newydd, fel y gellir trosglwyddo'r 77 o weithwyr hynny gydag amddiffyniad llawn deddfwriaeth TUPE, yn gyflym ac yn effeithlon, gan y bydd hyn nid yn unig yn sicrhau eu swyddi ond hefyd yn sicrhau parhad gwasanaeth i gwsmeriaid ac yn galluogi cwmni lleol arall i ddatblygu ei fusnes? Mae'r un peth yn wir am bum aelod arall o Main Port sy'n trosglwyddo i ail gwmni ar gyfer ail gontract cynnal a chadw lleol. O ystyried effaith cau Murco, ac rwy'n meddwl ei bod yn glir iawn bod diddymu neu gau Murco, un o'u prif gwsmeriaid, wedi bod yn ergyd wirioneddol. A allwch chi gynnig yr un lefel o gymorth a chefnogaeth ychwanegol a gafodd gweithwyr Murco i'r 83 o staff Main Port sy'n weddill? Rwy'n meddwl tybed, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, a allwch chi edrych ar y rhan a chwaraewyd gan Cyllid a Thollau Ei Mawrhydi yn hyn. Mae'r cwmni'n glir na chawsant unrhyw hysbysiad am y gorchymyn dirwyn i ben a gyhoeddwyd gan Gyllid a Thollau EM. Bu anghydfod parhaus, dros nifer o flynyddoedd yn ôl pob golwg, ac, er bod y rhan fwyaf o'r ddyled yn gymharol ddiweddar, roedd y cwmni yn y broses o lunio cynllun talu swyddogol. Ac, a bod yn onest, y camau hyn: nid oes neb yn ennill. Nid yw Cyllid a Thollau EM yn mynd i gael eu harian ychwaith. Yn olaf, a fyddech cystal ag archwilio pa un a gafodd hyfywedd ariannol hirdymor y cwmni ei archwilio'n briodol gan swyddogion Llywodraeth Cymru cyn darparu'r grant £650,000? Rwy'n cydnabod bod busnes yn gallu bod yn fenter beryglus, ond, o ystyried maint y ddyled a cholli eu prif gwsmer cyn i'r grant hwnnw gael ei ddyfarnu, hoffwn i'r cyhoedd fod yn fodlon bod diwydrwydd dyladwy wedi'i gyflawni'n drwyadl. Diolch.