English: Can I thank Suzy Davies for her questions? The declaration of a climate emergency has not been a factor in their decision making. Tata themselves recognise that they need to respond to the climate emergency, that they need to make savings in terms of energy costs, and that they need to ensure that they're decarbonising their footprint. We've been working with them, as the Member is aware, on the offer of £8 million of investment in Port Talbot's power plant and also on £666,000 for research and development into new product development. Now, we were making very good progress in these talks in terms of making sure that the conditions were adequate, particularly those concerning the protection of jobs. We were, in turn, very close to reaching an agreement on conditions earlier this year. But, since then, we know what's happened. There have been a number of announcements, including the collapse of the proposed joint venture with Thyssenkrupp; there's the proposed closure of Orb and now the latest announcement. That has held up the finalisation of an agreement on conditions, but we will not release that money until we are confident that it offers value for money, that investment, and that it will lead to jobs being protected for a good number of years. We are absolutely determined to use our financial resource to guarantee jobs are protected and that investment is protected in Welsh sites. The Member asks about the time frame for analysing the functions that could be lost as a consequence of the announcement. The detail that we have from Tata is simply that they will be looking at two thirds of the jobs coming from management and office-based roles. We will be meeting with them again very soon, and officials are in very regular contact, in an effort to get a better assessment of precisely what roles could be lost, so that we can begin the process of building support systems for the people most likely to lose their employment. In terms of the long-term future of Tata, it's been repeatedly said to me by Tata that these measures, the transformation programme, are designed to ensure the long-term survivability of the steel sector, or rather the Tata operations within the steel sector in the UK, and that it will release investment for those sites in Wales and across the border as well. I have no reason not to believe that this is absolutely true. I believe that Tata are acting in good faith when they assure me that this is about investing in the future of those facilities. Nonetheless, I would urge Tata to ensure that they consult meaningfully and engage properly with trade unions in ensuring that every bit of support that can be offered to employees is provided.
Welsh: A gaf fi ddiolch i Suzy Davies am ei chwestiynau? Nid yw'r datganiad argyfwng hinsawdd wedi bod yn ffactor wrth iddynt wneud eu penderfyniadau. Mae Tata eu hunain yn cydnabod bod angen iddynt ymateb i'r argyfwng hinsawdd, fod angen iddynt wneud arbedion o ran costau ynni, a bod angen iddynt sicrhau eu bod yn datgarboneiddio eu hôl troed. Rydym wedi bod yn gweithio gyda hwy, fel y gŵyr yr Aelod, ar y cynnig o fuddsoddiad o £8 miliwn yng ngorsaf bŵer Port Talbot a hefyd £666,000 ar gyfer gwaith ymchwil a datblygu i ddatblygu cynnyrch newydd. Nawr, roeddem yn gwneud cynnydd da iawn yn y trafodaethau hyn o ran sicrhau bod yr amodau'n ddigonol, yn enwedig y rheini a oedd yn ymwneud â diogelu swyddi. Yn ein tro, roeddem yn agos iawn at ddod i gytundeb ar amodau yn gynharach eleni. Ond ers hynny, fe wyddom beth sydd wedi digwydd. Mae nifer o gyhoeddiadau wedi bod, gan gynnwys methiant y fenter arfaethedig ar y cyd â ThyssenKrupp; y bwriad i gau Orb a'r cyhoeddiad diweddaraf yn awr. Mae hynny wedi peri oedi cyn cwblhau cytundeb ar amodau, ond ni fyddwn yn rhyddhau'r arian hwnnw nes ein bod yn hyderus y bydd y buddsoddiad yn cynnig gwerth am arian ac y bydd yn arwain at ddiogelu swyddi am nifer dda o flynyddoedd. Rydym yn gwbl benderfynol o ddefnyddio ein hadnoddau ariannol i warantu bod swyddi'n cael eu diogelu a bod buddsoddiad yn cael ei ddiogelu yng ngweithfeydd Cymru. Mae'r Aelod yn gofyn am yr amserlen ar gyfer dadansoddi'r swyddogaethau a allai gael eu colli o ganlyniad i'r cyhoeddiad. Yr hyn y mae Tata wedi'i ddweud wrthym yw y byddant yn edrych ar ddwy ran o dair o'r swyddi'n dod o rolau rheoli a rolau swyddfa. Byddwn yn cyfarfod â hwy eto'n fuan iawn, ac mae swyddogion mewn cysylltiad rheolaidd iawn, mewn ymdrech i gael gwell asesiad o ba rolau yn union a allai gael eu colli, fel y gallwn ddechrau'r broses o adeiladu systemau cymorth ar gyfer y bobl sydd fwyaf tebygol o golli eu swyddi. O ran dyfodol hirdymor Tata, mae Tata wedi dweud wrthyf dro ar ôl tro mai nod y mesurau hyn, y rhaglen drawsnewid, yw sicrhau bod y sector dur, neu, yn hytrach, gweithrediadau Tata o fewn y sector dur yn y DU, yn goroesi yn y tymor hir, ac y bydd yn rhyddhau buddsoddiad ar gyfer y safleoedd yng Nghymru ac ar draws y ffin hefyd. Nid oes gennyf reswm i beidio â chredu bod hyn yn hollol wir. Credaf fod Tata yn gweithredu'n ddidwyll pan fyddant yn fy sicrhau bod hyn yn ymwneud â buddsoddi yn nyfodol y gweithfeydd hynny. Serch hynny, buaswn yn annog Tata i sicrhau eu bod yn ymgynghori'n ystyrlon ac yn ymgysylltu'n briodol ag undebau llafur i sicrhau bod pob cymorth y gellir ei gynnig i weithwyr yn cael ei ddarparu.