English: Llywydd, there were an awful lot of 'suspects', of 'maybes' and 'could-have-beens' in that question. What the Welsh Government did was to follow the clinical advice that we had that testing somebody leaving a hospital who had no symptoms of coronavirus, going to a care home, was not something that offered you any clinical assurance. Anybody with symptoms was tested all along. It was only people who had no signs at all of coronavirus that weren't tested, and the clinical advice to us was that a test of that person would offer you no reliable assurance that would make any difference to the decisions that were being made about that person. The reason why we changed the guidance was not because the clinical advice had changed, but because we recognised the need to give confidence to people in the sector, that there were anxieties about people being discharged from hospital without a test even when that person had no signs of coronavirus at all, and because we recognise those concerns and the need to give confidence to people in that sector, we changed our arrangements so that people leaving hospitals, whether they have any symptoms or not of coronavirus, are now tested before they leave, and, indeed, we're extending that to any setting that somebody enters a care home from - not just from hospitals, but anywhere somebody entering a care home is moving from in Wales, that person will now be tested for coronavirus. But to be clear with the Member, the medical and clinical advice remain all the same all the way through: that a test of somebody who has no symptoms doesn't offer you anything useful in making the right decisions for that person. We've done it because we want to make sure that, for those people who are providing such an essential service to people, and who have anxieties, we are doing things that we can to give them the confidence they need to go on providing the essential service that they are providing.
Welsh: Llywydd, roedd llawer iawn o 'amau', 'efallai' a 'gallai fod' yn y cwestiwn yna. Yr hyn a wnaeth Llywodraeth Cymru oedd dilyn y cyngor clinigol a gawsom nad oedd profi rhywun sy'n gadael ysbyty heb unrhyw symptomau o coronafeirws, yn mynd i gartref gofal, yn rhywbeth a oedd yn cynnig unrhyw sicrwydd clinigol i chi. Profwyd unrhyw un â symptomau o'r cychwyn. Dim ond pobl nad oedd ganddyn nhw unrhyw arwyddion o gwbl o coronafeirws na chawsant eu profi, a'r cyngor clinigol i ni oedd na fyddai prawf i'r unigolyn hwnnw yn cynnig unrhyw sicrwydd dibynadwy i chi a fyddai'n gwneud unrhyw wahaniaeth i'r penderfyniadau a oedd yn cael eu gwneud am y person hwnnw. Y rheswm pam y newidiwyd y canllawiau gennym ni oedd nid oherwydd bod y cyngor clinigol wedi newid, ond oherwydd ein bod ni'n cydnabod yr angen i roi ffydd i bobl yn y sector, bod pryderon am bobl yn cael eu rhyddhau o'r ysbyty heb brawf hyd yn oed pan nad oedd gan yr unigolyn hwnnw unrhyw arwyddion o coronafeirws o gwbl, a chan ein bod ni'n cydnabod y pryderon hynny a'r angen i roi ffydd i bobl yn y sector hwnnw, newidiwyd ein trefniadau fel y bydd pobl sy'n gadael ysbytai, pa un a oes ganddyn nhw unrhyw symptomau o coronafeirws ai peidio, yn cael eu profi cyn iddyn nhw adael erbyn hyn, ac, yn wir, rydym ni'n ymestyn hynny i unrhyw leoliad y mae rhywun yn mynd i gartref gofal ohono - nid o ysbytai'n unig, ond unrhyw le mae rhywun sy'n mynd i gartref gofal yn symud ohono yng Nghymru, y bydd y person hwnnw'n cael ei brofi ar gyfer coronafeirws erbyn hyn. Ond i fod yn eglur gyda'r Aelod, mae'r cyngor meddygol a chlinigol yn parhau yr un fath drwy gydol y broses: sef nad yw profi rhywun nad oes ganddo symptomau yn cynnig unrhyw beth defnyddiol i chi wrth wneud y penderfyniadau iawn ar gyfer y person hwnnw. Rydym ni wedi ei wneud oherwydd ein bod ni eisiau gwneud yn siŵr, i'r bobl hynny sy'n darparu gwasanaeth mor hanfodol i bobl, ac sydd â phryderon, ein bod ni'n gwneud pethau y gallwn ni eu gwneud i roi'r hyder iddyn nhw sydd ei angen i barhau i ddarparu'r gwasanaeth hanfodol y maen nhw'n ei ddarparu.