English: Thank you for your statement. This is prudent healthcare in action. Well done. You know, given all the problems we face in the health service, it's really important that we are moving services to primary care, where it's safe to do so. And I'm sure this is going to be very much welcomed by people who can now get an excellent service in their local communities. I visited a really excellent optometry service in Pentwyn with your predecessor, Vaughan Gething, who piloted the electronic referral system and the digital imaging that enabled them to share these images of the eye with the ophthalmologist, where there was an urgency to get a specialist opinion. And I wondered if you could tell me - there was £4.8 million to develop the electronic patient record and £3.5 million to replace equipment - does that mean that all optometrists with higher qualifications can be certain of having that level of equipment, to enable them to quickly push through any serious concerns they detect in their examinations? Because that seems to me really important in relation to your answer to Russell George around ensuring that people don't lose their sight because we're hanging around. And, secondly, I wondered if I could ask you about how we're dealing with cataracts, because a friend of mine runs a very successful charity called Second Sight that deals with thousands of cataract operations in Bihar, which is the poorest part of India, using ophthalmologists from across the world. In Bihar, they can do 1,000 cataracts a day, which is obviously transformative. Do we have the same ambition in Wales to have these sort of production lines of cataracts? Because, yes, there are lots of them, but it's a pretty straightforward operation to do, and, therefore, we just need to get shot of the problem, and I'm sure people will be prepared to travel.
Welsh: Diolch am eich datganiad. Mae hwn yn ofal iechyd darbodus ar waith. Da iawn chi. Wyddoch chi, o ystyried yr holl broblemau sy'n ein hwynebu yn y gwasanaeth iechyd, ei bod yn bwysig iawn ein bod yn symud gwasanaethau i ofal sylfaenol, lle mae'n ddiogel gwneud hynny. Ac rwy'n siŵr y bydd hyn yn cael ei groesawu'n fawr gan bobl sydd bellach yn gallu cael gwasanaeth rhagorol yn eu cymunedau lleol. Ymwelais â gwasanaeth optometreg rhagorol iawn ym Mhentwyn gyda'ch rhagflaenydd, Vaughan Gething, a oedd wedi treialu'r system atgyfeirio electronig a'r delweddu digidol sydd wedi'u galluogi i rannu'r delweddau hyn o'r llygad gyda'r offthalmolegydd, lle'r oedd brys i gael barn arbenigol. A thybed a allwch chi ddweud wrthyf - roedd £4.8 miliwn i ddatblygu'r cofnod cleifion electronig a £3.5 miliwn i ddisodli offer - ydy hynny'n golygu y gall pob optometrydd sydd â chymwysterau uwch fod yn sicr o gael y lefel honno o offer, i'w galluogi i wthio'n gyflym drwy unrhyw bryderon difrifol maen nhw'n eu canfod yn eu harchwiliadau? Achos mae hynny'n ymddangos i mi'n bwysig iawn mewn perthynas â'ch ateb i Russell George ynghylch sicrhau nad yw pobl yn colli eu golwg oherwydd ein bod yn cicio ein sodlau. Ac, yn ail, tybed a allwn ofyn i chi am sut yr ydym yn delio â chataractau, oherwydd mae ffrind i mi yn rhedeg elusen lwyddiannus iawn o'r enw Second Sight sy'n delio â miloedd o lawdriniaethau cataract yn Bihar, sef y rhan dlotaf o India, gan ddefnyddio offthalmolegwyr o bob cwr o'r byd. Yn Bihar, gallant wneud 1,000 o gataractau y dydd, sy'n amlwg yn drawsnewidiol. A oes gennym yr un uchelgais yng Nghymru i gael y math hwn o linellau cynhyrchu ar gyfer cataractau? Oherwydd, oes, mae llawer ohonynt, ond mae'n llawdriniaeth eithaf syml i'w gwneud, ac, felly, mae angen i ni gael gwared ar y broblem, ac rwy'n siŵr y bydd pobl yn barod i deithio.