English: Thank you for that very important question. Yes, I'm aware of the Manchester report. I've started reading through it and it makes very, very grim reading indeed. It is something that I know the members of the judiciary are very concerned about, and I know that it is something where there are efforts to seek how to address it. It is not an easy issue to address within a justice system that works in this particular structure and the way in which it operates in conjunction with the legal profession. It's certainly the case that everyone in contact with the justice system deserves an equal opportunity to access the support and the help they need when they are engaged with the justice system. I mentioned earlier, when we were talking about the Cardiff University publication on the criminal justice system, the high rates, almost one of the highest rates in Europe, of imprisonment of those from ethnic backgrounds as opposed to white backgrounds. When you see that data in conjunction with the Manchester report, et cetera, you cannot help but say that there is an institutionalised racism within our justice system. One of the ways we seek to address this is by working with the criminal justice board for Wales partners, His Majesty's Prison Service, the courts service and policing in Wales to develop the criminal justice in Wales anti-racism action plan, which was published in September, and which the Minister for Social Justice has played such a major role in. This sets out our plan to tackle racism proactively, with a particular focus on staff diversity and training. But there is a long way to go. This also features as part of the evidential base, I believe, in terms of the need for the devolution of justice as well. That is something that is being monitored very closely and that we are raising in opportunities that we have with other law officers and with the Ministry of Justice.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiwn pwysig hwnnw. Ydw, rwy'n ymwybodol o adroddiad Manceinion. Rwyf wedi dechrau darllen drwyddo ac mae'r cynnwys yn llwm iawn. Mae'n rhywbeth y gwn fod aelodau'r farnwriaeth yn bryderus iawn yn ei gylch, ac rwy'n gwybod ei fod yn rhywbeth lle ceir ymdrechion i weld sut i fynd i'r afael ag ef. Nid yw'n fater hawdd i fynd i'r afael ag ef o fewn system gyfiawnder sy'n gweithio yn y strwythur penodol hwn a'r ffordd y mae'n gweithredu ar y cyd â'r proffesiwn cyfreithiol. Yn sicr, mae'n wir fod pawb sydd mewn cysylltiad â'r system gyfiawnder yn haeddu cyfle cyfartal i gael mynediad at y cymorth a'r help sydd ei angen arnynt pan fyddant yn ymwneud â'r system gyfiawnder. Soniais yn gynharach, pan oeddem yn sôn am gyhoeddiad Prifysgol Caerdydd ar y system cyfiawnder troseddol, am y cyfraddau uchel, un o'r cyfraddau uchaf yn Ewrop bron, o garcharu'r rheini o gefndiroedd ethnig o gymharu â chefndiroedd gwyn. Pan welwch y data hwnnw ar y cyd ag adroddiad Manceinion ac ati, ni allwch ymatal rhag dweud bod hiliaeth sefydliadol o fewn ein system gyfiawnder. Un o'r ffyrdd y ceisiwn fynd i'r afael â hyn yw drwy weithio gyda phartneriaid y bwrdd cyfiawnder troseddol yng Nghymru, Gwasanaeth Carchardai Ei Fawrhydi, y gwasanaeth llysoedd a phlismona yng Nghymru i ddatblygu'r cynllun gweithredu gwrth-hiliaeth ar gyfer cyfiawnder troseddol yng Nghymru, a gyhoeddwyd ym mis Medi, ac y mae'r Gweinidog Cyfiawnder Cymdeithasol wedi chwarae rhan mor bwysig ynddo. Mae'n nodi ein cynllun i fynd i'r afael â hiliaeth yn rhagweithiol, gan ganolbwyntio'n benodol ar amrywiaeth staff a hyfforddiant. Ond mae ffordd bell i fynd. Rwy'n credu bod hyn hefyd yn rhan o'r sylfaen dystiolaeth ar yr angen i ddatganoli cyfiawnder. Mae hynny'n rhywbeth sy'n cael ei fonitro'n agos iawn ac sy'n cael ei godi mewn cyfleoedd a gawn gyda swyddogion y gyfraith eraill a chyda'r Weinyddiaeth Gyfiawnder.