English: Thank you for the series of questions and comments. On the point about serious illness conversations, I'll happily provide an update for Members about how many staff have undergone the training in the last year and how many more we expect to have that training over the next year and more as a result of the additional resource we are putting into it. On your point about the survey of bereaved families and/or patients, I'd be happy to consider whether there is a better way forward from the iWantGreatCare survey, but at this point in time, no-one has suggested to me, and it's not been an ask from the board, that we need to have a different means of understanding feedback directly from people involved in the care and people who are involved in receiving care as well. I would have expected, if there was a real call for that and there was an inadequacy, that that would have come through the board, both from clinicians who are still champions for their patients, as well as from the campaigning third sector as well. So, if there is real evidence there's a need to do something different, then I'm open minded about it, but I would need to be persuaded that we don't currently have an adequate way of understanding the quality and the impact of the care that is provided. On the same note, on the point you made about the organisation of palliative care, we've got more people available at different times in the day now as well. We've got a service that is available throughout the week. I'd need to be persuaded that there is a different way in which that should be accessed. Part of the challenge, of course, and one of the points you made earlier, is what happens to those people who die alone in their own homes. Those evens, fortunately, are few and far between. There is a broader challenge about how we as a society engage within our own communities, with our neighbours, and with our loved ones. Because, actually, if family members are not engaging directly with those people, it's very difficult to then say it's somebody else's problem, whether it's the Government or the health service. There's a challenge about how people engage in services. The great majority of people are engaging in health services towards the end of their life. It's relatively unusual to have a sudden end to someone's life. It normally comes when people expect that is what is going to happen. It's really about how we support people involved in caring for people at the end of their life - those are people in families, friends, and of course professionals in health and care services. That's how the primary care register is drawn up and maintained. It is exactly that: people involved in care making sure they're ready and available to make sure we can properly target the resources we do have to properly support the professional and the individual. The final thing I'll say, on your point about the engagement, or otherwise, of the third sector and individuals, and engagement with the Government about the survey evidence that exists, is: we actually know, from all the different fields of engagement, that the hospice movement and third sector organisations are part of the organisation that designs and delivers these plans. They're part of the delivery board. They talk regularly to their health service organisations and individual commissioners as well. That's part of the strength of the way in which we design and deliver our delivery plans. I want to see that maintained. If people do have real evidence there's an inadequate source of information, I'll consider it. But, really, we don't want to undermine the strength of the board in the process. We do know there's very real challenge delivered through that, and I think we're all the better for it.
Welsh: Diolch am y gyfres o gwestiynau a sylwadau. Ar y pwynt am sgyrsiau am salwch difrifol, byddaf yn hapus i roi'r wybodaeth ddiweddaraf i'r Aelodau ynglŷn â faint o staff sydd wedi cael yr hyfforddiant yn y flwyddyn ddiwethaf a faint yn fwy yr ydym yn disgwyl iddynt gael yr hyfforddiant hwnnw yn ystod y flwyddyn nesaf a mwy, o ganlyniad i'r adnoddau ychwanegol yr ydym yn eu rhoi i mewn i hyn. O ran eich pwynt am yr arolwg o deuluoedd mewn profedigaeth a/neu gleifion, byddwn yn hapus i ystyried a oes ffordd well ymlaen o'r arolwg iWantGreatCare, ond ar hyn o bryd, nid oes neb wedi awgrymu i mi, ac nid yw'r bwrdd wedi gofyn, bod arnom angen gwahanol ddulliau o ddeall adborth yn uniongyrchol gan bobl sy'n ymwneud â'r gofal a phobl sy'n ymwneud â derbyn gofal hefyd. Byddwn wedi disgwyl, pe byddai galw gwirioneddol am hynny a bod annigonolrwydd, y byddai hynny wedi dod drwy'r bwrdd, gan glinigwyr sy'n dal i fod yn hyrwyddwyr dros eu cleifion, yn ogystal â gan ymgyrchoedd y trydydd sector hefyd. Felly, os oes tystiolaeth wirioneddol bod angen inni wneud rhywbeth yn wahanol, mae gennyf feddwl agored am y peth, ond byddai angen fy mherswadio nad oes gennym ar hyn o bryd ffordd ddigonol o ddeall ansawdd ac effaith y gofal sy'n cael ei ddarparu. Ar yr un nodyn, ar y pwynt a wnaethoch am drefnu gofal lliniarol, mae gennym fwy o bobl ar gael ar wahanol adegau o'r dydd nawr hefyd. Mae gennym wasanaeth sydd ar gael drwy gydol yr wythnos. Byddai angen fy mherswadio y dylid gwneud hynny mewn ffordd wahanol. Rhan o'r her, wrth gwrs, ac un o'r pwyntiau a wnaethoch yn gynharach, yw beth sy'n digwydd i'r bobl hynny sy'n marw ar eu pennau eu hunain yn eu cartrefi eu hunain. Mae'r digwyddiadau hynny, yn ffodus, yn brin iawn. Mae her ehangach ynglŷn â sut yr ydym fel cymdeithas yn ymgysylltu o fewn ein cymunedau ein hunain, gyda'n cymdogion, a gyda'n hanwyliaid. Oherwydd, mewn gwirionedd, os nad yw aelodau o'r teulu'n ymgysylltu'n uniongyrchol â'r bobl hynny, mae'n anodd iawn, wedyn, dweud mai problem rhywun arall ydyw, boed hwnnw y Llywodraeth neu'r gwasanaeth iechyd. Mae her ynglŷn â sut y mae pobl yn ymwneud â'r gwasanaethau. Mae'r mwyafrif helaeth o bobl yn defnyddio gwasanaethau iechyd tuag at ddiwedd eu hoes. Mae'n gymharol anghyffredin i fywyd rhywun ddiweddu'n sydyn. Fel arfer, mae'n digwydd pan fydd pobl yn disgwyl mai dyna sy'n mynd i ddigwydd. A dweud y gwir, mae'n fater o sut yr ydym yn cefnogi pobl sy'n ymwneud â gofalu am bobl ar ddiwedd eu hoes - mae'r bobl hynny'n deuluoedd, yn ffrindiau, ac wrth gwrs yn weithwyr proffesiynol yn y gwasanaethau iechyd a gofal. Dyna sut y mae'r gofrestr gofal sylfaenol yn cael ei llunio a'i chynnal. Mae'n union hynny: pobl sy'n ymwneud â gofal yn gwneud yn siŵr eu bod yn barod ac ar gael i wneud yn siŵr y gallwn dargedu'r adnoddau sydd gennym yn briodol i roi cefnogaeth briodol i'r gweithiwr proffesiynol ac i'r unigolyn. Y peth olaf yr wyf yn mynd i'w ddweud, am eich pwynt am ymgysylltiad, neu fel arall, y trydydd sector ac unigolion, ac ymgysylltu â'r Llywodraeth am y dystiolaeth arolwg sy'n bodoli, yw: rydym yn gwybod mewn gwirionedd, o'r holl wahanol feysydd ymgysylltu, bod y mudiad hosbisau a mudiadau'r trydydd sector yn rhan o'r sefydliad sy'n cynllunio ac yn darparu'r cynlluniau hyn. Maen nhw'n rhan o'r bwrdd cyflenwi. Maen nhw'n siarad yn rheolaidd â'u sefydliadau gwasanaeth iechyd a chomisiynwyr unigol yn ogystal. Mae hynny'n rhan o gryfder y ffordd yr ydym yn cynllunio ac yn darparu ein cynlluniau cyflawni. Hoffwn weld hynny'n cael ei gynnal. Os oes gan bobl dystiolaeth wirioneddol o ffynhonnell wybodaeth annigonol, fe wnaf ystyried y peth. Ond, a dweud y gwir, nid ydym eisiau tanseilio cryfder y bwrdd yn y broses. Rydym yn gwybod bod hynny'n cyflwyno her real iawn, ac rwy'n credu bod hynny'n beth da.