English: I agree with a lot of what Llyr is saying, that we, to some extent, are being bounced into this, and I think, in the light of David Attenborough's powerful speech, as already mentioned by Andrew R.T. Davies, what he said in Katowice really does force all of us to look deep into what we ought to be doing and what we're not actually delivering on. Because we've just had a discussion about Brexit and the importance of that to future generations. That's as nothing compared with this debate. There simply will be no world for our children and grandchildren to inherit unless we change our ways. As Attenborough said in Katowice, 'the collapse of our civilisations if we don't take action, and the extinction of much of the natural world, is on the horizon.' These are really strong words, and whilst I agree that we have to take people with us, it is not encouraging to see the populist position taken by the Chancellor of the Exchequer in failing year after year to raise the climate change levy on the fuel duty in order to reflect the amount of pollution that's involved in driving. So, do these regulations deliver on the commitments we entered into in Paris in 2015? Probably not, but they're a step in the right direction. We're told by the experts that we're currently on target for a disastrous 3 per cent warming. Therefore it is beholden on the industrialised world, which has benefited from all this consumption of the world's resources, to do more than the less developed countries in the world. I note that the UK Committee on Climate Change observed that progress remains a long way short of the Welsh Government's existing target to reduce emissions to a level of 40 per cent below the 1990 levels by 2020, in two years' time. I think we need to really seriously look at the status of Aberthaw, the coal-fired power station, because it presented 51 per cent of Welsh power emissions and 14 per cent of total Welsh emissions in 2015. So, therefore there has to be a win from that. That seems to me an easy win. Of course we have to ensure that we have alternative ways of generating electricity, but clearly coal is not it. It's no use to say, as they have done in Poland, 'Oh, that's what people's jobs rely on'. We have to change the jobs and use technology to get people doing different things. So, I would suggest to the Government that we need to close Aberthaw much sooner than 2025, and that would start to get us back on track, because we're clearly not where we need to be. I want to see an immediate revision of Part L of the building regulations. Relating back to what Andrew R.T. Davies said on taking people with us, we're never going to take the mass house builders with us. They're always going to want to go on producing the same old, same old not-energy-efficient housing until we instruct them not to, and that is the role of government - to ensure that people are delivering using the world's resources in the most effective way. We know that there is already the technology available to ensure that we have zero-carbon housing, and that is what people want and need, because, at the moment, they're spending far too much of their hard-earned money on trying to heat their homes in constructions that are inadequate. Although agriculture emissions have fallen by 15 per cent since 1990, they have risen slightly since 2009 and we need to do something about that, too. It isn't just the size of the land-use sink having decreased because more land is being built on, but it's also a reduction in tree planting. Also, we need to start looking at what food we're eating and how we're producing it. If we have intensive factory farming, it produces far more carbon emissions than if we have less intensive farming. All these things need to be looked at. I congratulate the Cabinet Secretary on being honest in admitting that, when a climate change analyst challenged the Government, the look on every Cabinet Secretary and Minister's face was one of absolute terror. It's not just the Government's job; it's the job of all of us to change our ways, but the Government must lead the way, and I suggest that we need to work towards 100 per cent by 2050 and, hopefully, we'll come back with some more challenging targets, because I don't think these are challenging enough.
Welsh: Cytunaf â llawer o'r hyn y mae Llŷr yn ei ddweud, ein bod i ryw raddau yn cael ein gwthio i wneud hyn. Ac rwy'n credu, yng ngoleuni araith bwerus David Attenborough, fel y crybwyllwyd eisoes gan Andrew R.T. Davies, mae'r hyn a ddywedodd yn Katowice mewn gwirionedd yn gorfodi pob un ohonom i ystyried yn fanwl yr hyn y dylem fod yn ei wneud a'r hyn nad ydym mewn gwirionedd yn ei gyflawni. Rydym newydd gael trafodaeth am Brexit a phwysigrwydd hynny i genedlaethau'r dyfodol. Nid yw hynny'n ddim byd o'i gymharu â'r ddadl hon. Oni newidiwn ein ffyrdd, ni fydd byd i'n plant a'n hwyrion ei etifeddu. Fel y dywedodd Attenborough yn Katowice, mae cwymp ein gwareiddiadau a difodiant llawer o'r byd naturiol ar y gorwel os nad ydym yn gweithredu. Mae'r rhain yn eiriau cryf iawn, ac er fy mod yn cytuno bod yn rhaid inni gynnwys y bobl, nid yw'n galonogol gweld safbwynt boblyddol Canghellor y Trysorlys yn methu flwyddyn ar ôl blwyddyn â chodi ardoll newid hinsawdd ar y dreth ar danwydd er mwyn adlewyrchu faint o lygredd a achosir gan yrru. Felly, a yw'r rheoliadau hyn yn cyflawni'r ymrwymiadau a wnaed gennym ym Mharis yn 2015? Mae'n debyg nad ydynt, ond maen nhw'n gam i'r cyfeiriad cywir. Dywedir wrthym gan yr arbenigwyr ein bod ar hyn o bryd yn anelu at gynhesu trychinebus o 3 y cant. Felly mae'n ddyletswydd ar y byd diwydiannol, sydd wedi elwa ar yr holl ddefnydd hwn o adnoddau'r byd, i wneud mwy na gwledydd llai datblygedig yn y byd. Nodaf fod Pwyllgor y DU ar Newid yn yr Hinsawdd wedi gweld bod cynnydd yn parhau i fod ymhell o gyrraedd targed presennol Llywodraeth Cymru i leihau allyriadau ar lefel o 40 y cant islaw lefelau 1990 erbyn 2020, ymhen dwy flynedd. Credaf fod angen inni edrych o ddifrif ar statws Aberddawan, yr orsaf bŵer glo, oherwydd cyflwynodd 51 y cant o allyriadau pŵer Cymru a 14 y cant o gyfanswm allyriadau Cymru yn 2015. Felly, rhaid bod buddugoliaeth o hynny. Ymddengys i mi yn fuddugoliaeth hawdd. Wrth gwrs mae'n rhaid inni sicrhau bod gennym ffyrdd amgen o gynhyrchu trydan, ond yn amlwg nid glo yw hynny. Does dim diben dweud, fel y maent wedi'i wneud yng Ngwlad Pwyl, 'O, dyna beth mae swyddi pobl yn dibynnu arno'. Rhaid inni newid y swyddi a defnyddio technoleg i gael pobl i wneud pethau gwahanol. Felly, byddwn yn awgrymu i'r Llywodraeth bod angen inni gau Aberddawan ymhell cyn 2025, a byddai hynny'n ein cael yn ôl ar y trywydd iawn, oherwydd mae'n glir nad ydym yn y lle mae angen inni fod. Hoffwn weld adolygiad ar unwaith o Ran L o'r rheoliadau adeiladu. Gan gyfeirio'n ôl at yr hyn a ddywedodd Andrew R.T. Davies ynglŷn â chynnwys y bobl, dydyn ni byth yn mynd i allu cynnwys yr adeiladwyr tai torfol gyda ni. Maen nhw bob amser yn mynd i fod eisiau parhau i gynhyrchu'r un hen d ai nad ydynt yn effeithlon o ran ynni nes inni ddweud wrthynt am beidio, a dyna swyddogaeth y Llywodraeth - sicrhau bod pobl yn cyflawni drwy ddefnyddio adnoddau'r byd yn y ffordd fwyaf effeithiol. Gwyddom eisoes fod y dechnoleg ar gael i sicrhau bod gennym dai di-garbon, a dyna'r hyn sydd ei eisiau a'i angen ar bobl, oherwydd, ar hyn o bryd maen nhw'n gwario llawer gormod o'u harian haeddiannol ar geisio gwresogi eu cartrefi mewn adeiladau sy'n annigonol. Mae allyriadau amaethyddiaeth wedi gostwng 15 y cant ers 1990, ond maent wedi cynyddu ychydig ers 2009 ac mae angen inni wneud rhywbeth am hynny, hefyd. Nid yw'n ymwneud yn unig â'r ffaith bod dalfeydd defnydd tir wedi gostwng gan fod mwy o adeiladu'n digwydd ar y tir, ond hefyd mae llai o blannu coed yn digwydd. Mae angen inni ddechrau edrych ar y bwyd yr ydym yn ei fwyta a sut yr ydym yn ei gynhyrchu. Os oes gennym ffermio ffatri dwys, mae'n cynhyrchu llawer mwy o allyriadau carbon na phe bai gennym ffermio llai dwys. Mae angen edrych ar y pethau hyn. Rwy'n llongyfarch Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet am fod yn onest a chyfaddef, pan heriwyd y Llywodraeth gan ddadansoddwr newid hinsawdd, fod yr olwg ar wyneb pob Ysgrifennydd Cabinet a Gweinidog yn un o arswyd llwyr. Nid gwaith y Llywodraeth yn unig yw hyn; gwaith pob un ohonom yw newid ein ffyrdd. Ond rhaid i'r Llywodraeth arwain y ffordd, ac awgrymaf fod angen inni weithio tuag at 100 y cant erbyn 2050, ac y byddwn, gobeithio, yn dod yn ôl gyda rhai targedau mwy heriol, oherwydd ni chredaf fod y rhain yn ddigon heriol.