English: Thank you, First Minister, for your statement. First of all, can I just begin by associating myself with the comments made about the potential of an autism Act? I'm pleased to say that, even just in this last month or so, you've moved your position from this time in May saying that you were hoping to avoid the need for a separate Bill, as that might take more time, to the more attractive proposition in your answer to Andrew R.T. Davies last week, saying that you're actively considering an autism Act and believe that it needs consideration separate from other legislation. So, I'm pleased about that. However, you mentioned in reply to Simon Thomas earlier on that that was partly, or due, to some degree, to the liaison committee that you have with Plaid Cymru at the moment, and I wonder if you could just explain whether that liaison committee has helped you conclude that an Act is needed or whether they are influential, in any particular way, about the content of that Act. Because if it's the latter, I think that leads us to one of the initial difficulties with this committee, outside a formal coalition, in as much as one opposition has the opportunity to influence legislation before it is drafted when the rest of us don't. If that is the case, can you just confirm that you'll be prepared for any Act that comes out to first draft, via this process, to be presented to the relevant committee for pre-legislative scrutiny, so that all opposition parties get the opportunity to influence Government legislation before it's drafted? My second question relates to the right to buy. I don't propose to enter into the rights and wrongs of that, but speaking speculatively, if the UK Government were to identify a pot of money to help the English right-to-buy system work more effectively, or to help housing associations carry on with the legislation - sorry, the processes that they're looking at now, would you be expecting some kind of a Barnettisation from that pot of money to come to Wales? I'm rather hoping that you'll say 'no'. I appreciate that this is just a hypothetical question, but I think it's one worth answering, because if you were to say 'yes' to that, there'd be a question, wouldn't there, about why Wales wouldn't be raising its own money in those circumstances, towards contributing to its housing stock? Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch, Brif Weinidog, am eich datganiad. Yn gyntaf oll, a gaf i ddechrau drwy fy nghysylltu fy hun â'r sylwadau a wnaethpwyd ynghylch y posibilrwydd o Ddeddf awtistiaeth? Rwy'n falch o ddweud, hyd yn oed dim ond yn y mis diwethaf hwn, eich bod wedi newid eich safbwynt ers yr adeg hon ym mis Mai o ddweud eich bod yn gobeithio osgoi'r angen am Fil ar wahân, gan y gallai hynny gymryd mwy o amser, i'r safbwynt mwy deniadol yn eich ateb i Andrew R.T. Davies yr wythnos diwethaf, gan ddweud eich bod yn ystyried Deddf awtistiaeth ac yn credu bod angen ei hystyried ar wahân i ddeddfwriaeth arall. Felly, rwy'n falch o hynny. Fodd bynnag, soniasoch wrth ateb Simon Thomas yn gynharach fod hynny'n rhannol, neu i ryw raddau, oherwydd y pwyllgor cyswllt sydd gennych gyda Phlaid Cymru ar hyn o bryd, ac roeddwn i'n meddwl tybed a allech chi egluro a yw'r pwyllgor cyswllt hwnnw wedi eich helpu i ddod i'r casgliad bod angen Deddf neu a yw'n ddylanwadol, mewn unrhyw ffordd benodol, ynglŷn â chynnwys y Ddeddf honno. Oherwydd os mai'r olaf o'r rhain sy'n wir, rwy'n meddwl bod hynny'n ein harwain at un o'r anawsterau cychwynnol â'r pwyllgor hwn, y tu allan i glymblaid ffurfiol, sef bod gan un wrthblaid gyfle i ddylanwadu ar ddeddfwriaeth cyn iddi gael ei drafftio, pan nad yw'r gweddill ohonom yn cael gwneud hynny. Os yw hynny'n wir, a allwch chi gadarnhau y byddwch yn fodlon i unrhyw Ddeddf sy'n dod allan i ddrafft cyntaf, drwy'r broses hon, gael ei chyflwyno i'r pwyllgor perthnasol ar gyfer craffu cyn y broses ddeddfu, fel bod yr holl wrthbleidiau'n cael y cyfle i ddylanwadu ar ddeddfwriaeth y Llywodraeth cyn ei drafftio? Mae fy ail gwestiwn yn ymwneud â'r hawl i brynu. Nid wyf yn bwriadu sôn am rinweddau a chamweddau hynny, ond yn ddamcaniaethol, pe byddai Llywodraeth y DU yn nodi pot o arian i helpu system hawl i brynu Lloegr i weithio'n fwy effeithiol, neu i helpu cymdeithasau tai i fwrw ymlaen â'r ddeddfwriaeth - mae'n ddrwg gennyf, y prosesau y maent yn edrych arnynt ar hyn o bryd, a fyddech chi'n disgwyl rhyw fath o Farnetteiddio o'r pot hwnnw o arian i ddod i Gymru? Rwyf wir yn gobeithio y byddwch yn dweud 'na'. Rwy'n sylweddoli mai dim ond cwestiwn damcaniaethol yw hwn, ond rwy'n meddwl ei fod yn un sy'n werth ei ateb, oherwydd pe byddech yn dweud 'byddwn' i hynny, byddai hynny'n codi cwestiwn, oni fyddai, am y rheswm pam na fyddai Cymru'n codi ei harian ei hun dan yr amgylchiadau hynny, tuag at gyfrannu at ei stoc dai? Diolch.