English: I can supplement that further with another statement that occurred in the Cabinet Secretary's most recent statement to this Assembly, where he said also that the level of financial risk borne by the private sector being less than 50 per cent, he explained: This is because the £210 million underwriting element would carry a higher risk than other parts of the financial package', which can't possibly be true, because there's £48 million of equity risk here that is not protected at all and goes down the plughole if the project fails, and also another £47 million of debt that is subordinated to the Government's own guarantee. So, that was a factual inaccuracy, as well, on top. I don't even understand where the £375 million debt figure itself arises from, but that's a point of detail that we can explore on another occasion. But the fundamental absurdity of the situation we now find ourselves in is that the Government is not asked to put in a single penny up front by way of investment funding for this project, although, out of the back pocket, as I described it in First Minister's questions yesterday - a description that the First Minister demurred - we now know that that is provided out of the general reserve of the Government, which is, I think, fairly described as the back pocket. We didn't know this £100 million was nestling there, undisturbed and available for any wizard scheme that could be dreamed up at five minutes' notice to be blown on a project for which there are currently no takers. And if ever there were a case of due diligence that needs to be done, it's into the project that the Government now is proposed not only to put in a contingent liability, but an actual liability for the next 10 years, which itself will be at the expense of schools and hospitals and all the other things that they claim not to be able to finance if they went ahead with the Circuit of Wales project. So, we now are spending, as I described it last week, shedloads of money on a collection of empty sheds, rather than having a world-class racing circuit on the back of which, as Adam Price rightly said, we might be able to attract, as a cluster, a number of automotive companies to take advantage of the celebrity that that potentially can bring. Why would they come to an empty site in Ebbw Vale with nothing that relates to what they intend to do there? So, I do believe that this Government has not just failed the people of Ebbw Vale, but failed the people of Wales, and after 20 years, I think we've seen enough of this Government, and it's time that they went.
Welsh: Gallaf ychwanegu at hynny gyda datganiad arall a ddigwyddodd yn natganiad diweddaraf Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet i'r Cynulliad hwn, lle y dywedodd hefyd fod lefel y risg ariannol a ysgwyddir gan y sector preifat yn llai na 50 y cant, ac eglurodd: 'Mae hynny oherwydd y byddai'r elfen warant o £210 miliwn yn cario risg uwch na rhannau eraill y pecyn ariannol', nad yw'n bosibl ei fod yn wir, gan fod £48 miliwn o risg ecwiti yma nad yw wedi'i ddiogelu o gwbl ac sy'n mynd i lawr y draen os yw'r prosiect yn methu, a £47 miliwn arall o ddyled hefyd sy'n ddarostyngedig i warant y Llywodraeth ei hun. Felly, roedd hwnnw'n anghywirdeb ffeithiol hefyd, ar ben hynny. Nid wyf hyd yn oed yn deall o ble y daw ffigur y ddyled, ond mae hwnnw'n fanylyn y gallwn ei archwilio ar achlysur arall. Ond ffolineb sylfaenol y sefyllfa rydym ynddi yn awr yw nad oes gofyn i'r Llywodraeth roi ceiniog ymlaen llaw drwy gyllid buddsoddi i'r prosiect hwn, er ein bod yn gwybod bellach, o'r boced gefn, fel y disgrifiais yn y cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog ddoe - disgrifiad a wrthodwyd gan y Prif Weinidog - gwyddom bellach fod hwnnw'n cael ei ddarparu o gronfa wrth gefn gyffredinol y Llywodraeth y mae'n deg ei disgrifio fel poced gefn, rwy'n meddwl. Nid oeddem yn gwybod bod y £100 miliwn hwn yn swatio yno heb ei gyffwrdd ac ar gael ar gyfer unrhyw gynllun hudol y gellid ei greu mewn pum munud i'w wastraffu ar brosiect nad oes neb ei eisiau ar hyn o bryd. Ac os bu achos erioed o'r angen am ddiwydrwydd dyladwy, dylid ei wneud ar y prosiect y mae'r Llywodraeth yn awr yn bwriadu darparu nid yn unig rhwymedigaeth ddigwyddiadol, ond rhwymedigaeth wirioneddol ar ei gyfer am y 10 mlynedd nesaf, a fyddai ynddo'i hun ar draul ysgolion ac ysbytai a'r holl bethau eraill y maent yn honni na allant eu hariannu pe baent yn bwrw ymlaen ar brosiect Cylchffordd Cymru. Felly, fel y disgrifiais yr wythnos diwethaf, rydym bellach yn gwario llawer iawn o arian ar gasgliad o siediau gwag, yn hytrach na chael cylchffordd rasio fyd-eang, fel y dywedodd Adam Price yn gywir, inni allu denu, fel clwstwr, nifer o gwmnïau modurol yn ei sgil i fanteisio ar yr enwogrwydd a allai ddeillio o hynny o bosibl. Pam y byddent yn dod i safle gwag yng Nglynebwy heb ddim sy'n berthnasol i'r hyn y bwriadant ei wneud yno? Felly, rwy'n credu bod y Llywodraeth hon wedi gwneud cam â phobl Glynebwy, ac wedi gwneud cam â phobl Cymru, ac ar ôl 20 mlynedd, rwy'n meddwl ein bod wedi gweld digon ar y Llywodraeth hon, ac mae'n bryd eu bod yn mynd.