English: Well, can I start by saying that I suppose it's very clear that the Member hasn't read the legislation, otherwise she might have more concerns about the way in which it is proceeding? The first part of it is to say that I had meetings with Mr Rees-Mogg before the change in Prime Minister, and I've had a recent meeting as well, specifically to discuss the Bill. The issues that I think concern us, first of all, are that what has now appeared - and it appears to be the result of a very unfortunate and ill-thought-out comment that was made during the Prime Ministerial leadership election - is that, suddenly, we would get rid of all this stuff by the end of December 2023, without any real consideration of what the implications of that were. So, that is something that is a major concern because there are 2,400 of these. We could be sitting non-stop, every hour, every second, every minute of the day for the next five years and we would not properly be able to consider 2,400 items of legislation. Secondly, it does not deal also with the issue of devolved legislation. And, also, what it does not do is actually delineate what the aspects are of those 2,400. All we actually have is a schedule listing all those items. So, firstly, there is an enormous amount of work, which Scotland has also raised, I think, and we have raised, that actually has the potential to derail the whole legislative processes of the Scottish Government, the Welsh Government, and indeed the UK Government. So, it's most unfortunate that it is being presented in that particular way. Nevertheless, we will be looking at that to address how we might be able to deal with it. We have to do that. The second thing is that there is some provision for an extension of the sunset in certain areas. At the moment, that is only with the UK Government. So, we have made a number of very important points. Firstly, in respect of the power to extend, it should be one that Welsh Ministers should also have. We've also said that the power to assimilate, restate and revoke, clearly, will be something for Welsh Ministers as well. The ability to actually intervene in any legal proceedings where there's the issue of the status of EU law should also be with Welsh Ministers, both in respect of devolved legislation, but also UK legislation that has an impact on devolved responsibilities. So, I suppose the other point as well is that, of course, we have an approach that is one where we actually want to know what the implications would be of point-blank revocation in terms of standards in so many areas. And the difficulty is, at this stage, that it is impossible to evaluate what all of those are. So, having had the meeting with the Minister on 28 September, I've sought assurances. I can say that the meeting was very positive. I think there were very positive commitments that were expressed in respect of this not overturning any devolved powers or responsibilities; that we would be in a position to retain the legislation that we wished to retain; that any changes to legislation in devolved areas will remain with us. Now, as we know with the UK Government, I take that in the spirit in which it has been offered, and we'll wait to see what that means in detail. But, whatever happens, what it does not do is get us away from the fact that this has an enormous cost in terms of legal resources. It'll have a financial cost, an enormous financial cost, and an enormous legal resource cost as well. We will certainly need to look at whether there are areas whereby - [ Interruption.]
Welsh: Wel, os caf ddechrau drwy ddweud ei bod yn amlwg iawn nad yw'r Aelod wedi darllen y ddeddfwriaeth, neu fel arall, efallai y byddai ganddi fwy o bryderon ynghylch y ffordd y mae'n mynd rhagddi? Yn gyntaf, rwyf wedi cael cyfarfodydd gyda Mr Rees-Mogg cyn i'r Prif Weinidog newid, ac rwyf wedi cael cyfarfod diweddar hefyd, yn benodol i drafod y Bil. Y materion y credaf eu bod yn ymwneud â ni, yn gyntaf oll, yw bod yr hyn sydd bellach wedi ymddangos - ac mae'n ymddangos bod hynny'n ganlyniad i sylw anffodus ac annoeth iawn a wnaed yn ystod etholiad arweinyddiaeth y Prif Weinidog - sef, yn sydyn, y byddem yn cael gwared â'r holl bethau hyn erbyn diwedd mis Rhagfyr 2023, heb unrhyw ystyriaeth wirioneddol o beth oedd goblygiadau hynny. Felly, mae hynny'n rhywbeth sy'n bryder mawr, gan fod 2,400 o'r rhain. Gallem fod yn cyfarfod yn ddi-baid, bob awr, bob eiliad, bob munud o'r dydd am y pum mlynedd nesaf ac ni fyddem yn gallu ystyried 2,400 eitem o ddeddfwriaeth yn briodol. Yn ail, nid yw'n ymwneud ychwaith â mater deddfwriaeth ddatganoledig. A'r hyn nad yw'n ei wneud hefyd yw amlinellu beth yw'r agweddau ar y 2,400 hynny. Y cyfan sydd gennym yw amserlen sy'n rhestru'r holl eitemau hynny. Felly, yn gyntaf, ac mae'r Alban hefyd wedi'i godi, rwy'n credu, ac rydym ni wedi'i godi, ceir llawer iawn o waith a allai amharu ar holl brosesau deddfwriaethol Llywodraeth yr Alban, Llywodraeth Cymru, a Llywodraeth y DU yn wir. Felly, mae'n anffodus iawn ei fod yn cael ei gyflwyno yn y ffordd benodol honno. Serch hynny, byddwn yn edrych ar sut y gallem fynd i'r afael â hynny. Mae'n rhaid inni wneud hynny. Yr ail beth yw bod rhywfaint o ddarpariaeth ar gyfer ymestyn y machlud mewn rhai meysydd. Ar hyn o bryd, dim ond Llywodraeth y DU sydd â'r gallu i wneud hynny. Felly, rydym wedi gwneud nifer o bwyntiau pwysig iawn. Yn gyntaf, ynghylch y pŵer i ymestyn, dylai fod yn un sydd gan Weinidogion Cymru hefyd. Rydym hefyd wedi dweud y bydd y pŵer i gymhathu, ailddatgan a dirymu yn amlwg yn rhywbeth ar gyfer Gweinidogion Cymru hefyd. Dylai Gweinidogion Cymru hefyd fod â'r gallu i ymyrryd mewn unrhyw achos cyfreithiol lle mae mater statws cyfraith yr UE yn codi, a hynny o ran deddfwriaeth ddatganoledig, ond hefyd deddfwriaeth y DU sy'n effeithio ar gyfrifoldebau datganoledig. Felly, mae'n debyg mai'r pwynt arall hefyd wrth gwrs yw bod gennym agwedd lle rydym am wybod beth fyddai'r goblygiadau o ddirymu uniongyrchol o ran safonau mewn cymaint o feysydd. A'r anhawster, ar hyn o bryd, yw ei bod yn amhosibl gwerthuso beth yw pob un o'r rheini. Felly, ar ôl cael y cyfarfod gyda'r Gweinidog ar 28 Medi, rwyf wedi gofyn am sicrwydd. Gallaf ddweud bod y cyfarfod yn gadarnhaol iawn. Rwy'n credu bod ymrwymiadau cadarnhaol iawn wedi'u mynegi na fydd hyn yn gwrthdroi unrhyw bwerau na chyfrifoldebau datganoledig; y byddem mewn sefyllfa i gadw'r ddeddfwriaeth y dymunem ei chadw; y byddai unrhyw newidiadau i ddeddfwriaeth mewn meysydd datganoledig yn aros gyda ni. Nawr, fel y gwyddom gyda Llywodraeth y DU, rwy'n derbyn hynny yn yr ysbryd y cafodd ei gynnig, ac fe arhoswn i weld beth y mae hynny'n ei olygu mewn manylder. Ond beth bynnag sy'n digwydd, ni allwn osgoi'r ffaith bod cost enfawr i hyn mewn adnoddau cyfreithiol. Bydd iddo gost ariannol, cost ariannol enfawr, a chost enfawr mewn adnoddau cyfreithiol hefyd. Yn sicr, bydd angen inni edrych a oes meysydd lle bydd - [ Torri ar draws.]