English: I couldn't agree with the Member more. If you take a school, for example, if a school was performing badly and not delivering results for its pupils, then action would be taken to ensure that it was brought up to standard. But in terms of the private sector, we don't have these powers currently, but we do have the ability through the planning review to look at this, and I think it's absolutely vital that we do so. I know that the developer in question has also paid multimillion-pound bonds to the local authority, but that also seemingly has no impact either. And in many cases, the sums needed to bring these estates up to an adoptable standard is comparatively insignificant. For example, the estate that has been unadopted for 17 years, the housing developer there told me themselves that the one and only outstanding job would cost just a few thousand pounds to complete, yet nothing has happened. At the same time as I was meeting that developer, lobbying for my constituents, they announced a bonus package of over £500 million for their top bosses. This may provide a clue to the developer's identity. In addition, the package included over £100 million of personal bonus payments for their chief executive - for one man presiding over a company where they told me themselves they have over 40 unadopted estates in Wales. It is no surprise that this leaves a bad taste in my constituents' mouths. I'm delighted to support this motion today, and I'd like to echo Mike Hedges's call for the current review of planning in Wales to address this issue. I can only hope that it helps contribute to a resolution for my constituents.
Welsh: Rwy'n cytuno'n llwyr â'r Aelod. Os cymerwch ysgol, er enghraifft, pe bai ysgol yn perfformio'n wael ac yn methu sicrhau canlyniadau i'w disgyblion, yna byddai camau'n cael eu rhoi ar waith i sicrhau bod ei safonau'n codi. Ond yn y sector preifat, nid oes gennym bwerau o'r fath ar hyn o bryd, ond mae gennym y gallu drwy'r adolygiad cynllunio i edrych ar hyn, ac mae'n gwbl hanfodol yn fy marn i ein bod yn gwneud hynny. Gwn fod y datblygwr dan sylw hefyd wedi talu bondiau gwerth miliynau lawer i'r awdurdod lleol, ond yn ôl pob golwg nid yw hynny wedi cael unrhyw effaith chwaith. Ac mewn llawer o achosion, mae'r symiau sydd eu hangen i sicrhau bod yr ystadau hyn yn cyrraedd y safonau mabwysiadwy yn gymharol ddibwys. Er enghraifft, yn achos yr ystâd a fu heb ei mabwysiadu ers 17 mlynedd, dywedodd y datblygwr tai yno wrthyf eu hunain na fyddai'r un eitem o waith sy'n dal heb ei wneud ond yn costio ychydig filoedd o bunnoedd i'w chwblhau, ac eto nid oes dim wedi digwydd. Ar yr un pryd â fy nghyfarfod gyda'r datblygwr hwnnw, yn lobïo ar ran fy etholwyr, cyhoeddodd y cwmni becyn bonws o dros £500 miliwn i'w prif swyddogion. Efallai y bydd hyn yn rhoi awgrym pwy yw'r datblygwr. Yn ogystal, roedd y pecyn yn cynnwys dros £100 miliwn o daliadau bonws personol ar gyfer eu prif weithredwr - i un dyn sy'n llywyddu dros gwmni lle y dywedasant wrthyf eu hunain fod ganddynt dros 40 o ystadau heb eu mabwysiadu yng Nghymru. Nid yw'n syndod fod hyn yn gadael blas cas yng nghegau fy etholwyr. Rwy'n falch iawn o gefnogi'r cynnig hwn heddiw, a hoffwn adleisio galwad Mike Hedges am i'r adolygiad cynllunio presennol yng Nghymru roi sylw i'r mater hwn. Ni allaf ond gobeithio y bydd yn helpu i gyfrannu at ateb i fy etholwyr.