English: I don't disagree with that. As we said, we put an obligation on new build, the big issue for us is how on earth do we get the retrofit to happen. So, nobody's arguing that it should be done, it's just a question of how on earth we're to do it. The other thing is, the technology is changing all the time, so a sprinkler system in 2002 wouldn't have looked anything like the misting systems that you have now. That would have just drenched everything in soaking wet water and would not have made home owners happy. The misting systems that we have now are much more effective and cause much less damage to householder property. So, they have lots of concurrent benefits: they save your life; they also stop your asset being destroyed, or largely. And they're far, far better than having the fire service come and soak your entire house with a high-pressure hose, which will certainly put your fire out but will also render your asset pretty much useless. So, there are lots of things to be taken into account here. And as each sector looks at its asset base and how it wants to preserve it, it comes to a conclusion about how best to look at that. Deputy Presiding Officer, we're doing this in conjunction with a number of other reviews as well. We're about to have a review back on the decarbonisation of our existing housing stock, which will have a dramatic impact on other retrofits. So, we need to tie them together so that we're not asking any sector to do three or four lots of retrofit in succession with different legislation coming through. So, we need to bear in mind that if you're going to retrofit a dwelling, you want to do it for everything at the same time and not have a piecemeal approach. So, I accept Mark Isherwood's point. This stuff has been around. Nobody's arguing that we need to do it. We're just talking about what the very best way to have the very best system in Wales is that will endure into the future.
Welsh: Nid wyf i'n anghytuno â hynny. Fel yr ydym wedi'i ddweud, rydym yn rhoi ymrwymiad wrth adeiladu o'r newydd, y broblem fawr i ni yw sut ar y ddaear y gallwn ni sicrhau bod yr ôl-osodiadau yn digwydd. Felly, nid oes neb yn dadlau y dylid ei wneud, mae'n fater o sut ar y ddaear ydym ni'n gwneud hynny. Y peth arall yw bod y dechnoleg yn newid drwy'r amser, felly ni fyddai system chwistrellu yn 2002 wedi edrych dim byd tebyg i'r systemau tarth sydd gennych chi nawr. Byddai hynny wedi trochi popeth mewn dŵr gwlyb sop ac ni fyddai perchnogion cartrefi wedi bod yn hapus. Mae'r systemau tarth sydd gennym ni yn awr yn llawer mwy effeithiol ac yn achosi llawer llai o ddifrod i eiddo deiliaid tai. Felly, mae ganddyn nhw lawer o fuddion cydamserol: maen nhw'n achub eich bywyd; maen nhw hefyd yn atal eich asedau rhag cael eu dinistrio, neu i raddau helaeth. Ac maen nhw o bell, bell ffordd yn llawer gwell na bod y gwasanaeth tân yn dod i'r tŷ ac yn trochi pob dim ynddo â phibell pwysedd uchel, a fydd yn sicr o ddiffodd eich tân ond a fydd hefyd yn gwneud eich ased yn ddiwerth i bob pwrpas. Felly, mae llawer o bethau i'w hystyried yma. Ac wrth i bob sector edrych ar ei asedau a sut y mae'n dymuno eu cadw, mae'n dod i gasgliad ynglŷn â'r ffordd orau o wneud hynny. Dirprwy Lywydd, rydym ni'n gwneud hyn ar y cyd â nifer o adolygiadau eraill hefyd. Rydym ar fin cael adolygiad yn ôl ar ddatgarboneiddio ein stoc dai bresennol, a fydd yn cael effaith fawr ar ôl-osodiadau eraill. Felly, mae angen inni eu cyfuno fel nad ydym yn gofyn i unrhyw sector wneud cyfres o dri neu bedwar ôl-osodiad yn olynol wrth i ddeddfwriaeth wahanol gael ei chyflwyno. Felly, mae angen inni gofio, os ydych am ôl-osod annedd, y byddwch chi eisiau gwneud popeth ar yr un pryd a pheidio â gwneud hynny bob yn dipyn. Felly, rwy'n derbyn pwynt Mark Isherwood. Mae'r pethau hyn wedi eu trafod eisoes. Nid oes neb yn dadlau bod angen i ni wneud hyn. Ond rydym yn sôn am beth yw'r ffordd orau o gael y system orau bosib yng Nghymru a fydd yn para i'r dyfodol.