English: I thank the Member for that series of questions. I do welcome the remarks that she opened with, to thank civil servants and people across the public sector in Wales for all the work they've been doing. That will have been very well received by those who have been engaged so hard over that period. And I also welcome the attention that she draws in her question to the relationship between Brexit and the preparations for a 'no deal' Brexit in particular and the pressures of austerity. Those twin challenges, I think, place particularly acute pressures on all parts of Government, public services and, indeed, the third sector and the private sector as well, so I welcome that remark. In relation to the question of duration, I was actually quoting Guy Verhofstadt's remark about the duration. She will know that we have indicated that, in our view, the renegotiation of the political declaration to reflect the kinds of principles that her party and mine set out jointly in 'Securing Wales' Future' was something that could be done in relatively short order that would not require that level of extension - the kind of extension that's been now given by the European Council. But it's evident, equally, that the existence of that extension reflects, really, I think, on their part, a sense of exhaustion about continuing discussion, dialogue, and, as they perhaps would describe it, the distraction from the other business and priorities that our European Union colleagues inevitably will have. But, having provided that significant extension, my point was simply to say that we need to continue to press to make sure that the discussions under way are meaningful and not regard that period as a period in which to retrench into preferences and perhaps into a sense that we don't need to engage. That would be the wrong interpretation of that period of time, of that extension. In relation to discussions that we've had with the frontbench, obviously, those are discussions within the party, but it's absolutely clear that those reflect the principles that we've espoused publicly here, and, again, as I will say, jointly with her party in 'Securing Wales' Future', for dynamic alignment of rights, a close relationship with the single market and membership of a customs union, amongst other things. And she'll be familiar, I know, with the priorities that we have both jointly set out. I have been clear and I've provided statutory language that would enable there to be parallel discussions with the devolved administrations in relation to the development of the negotiation of the political declaration. I know that that is also an ambition of the Scottish Government, she will be unsurprised to hear. And, having written to David Lidington on exactly that point, I also followed that up in a conversation with him perhaps two weeks ago to reiterate how important it was for that to continue. I welcome the engagement that the Member continues to make in relation to this issue. I think, on the question of preparations in particular, her closing point, just to be clear - I think I've said this publicly before - we have pressed the UK Government to make sure that steps are taken by the UK Government, which is principally responsible for this, and the Electoral Commission. I raised that again with David Lidington in that same conversation only two or three weeks ago. And I know also that the First Minister has written to the Permanent Secretary asking her to reflect on what steps the Welsh Government at large need to take in order to prepare for that. But she will hear from my statement the statutory basis for most of those steps, and those steps largely lie in Westminster.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y gyfres honno o gwestiynau. Rwyf yn croesawu ei sylwadau agoriadol, a oedd yn diolch i weision sifil ac i bobl ym mhob rhan o'r sector cyhoeddus yng Nghymru am yr holl waith y maen nhw wedi bod yn ei wneud. Bydd hynny wedi cael derbyniad da iawn gan y rhai sydd wedi bod yn gweithio mor galed dros y cyfnod hwnnw. Ac rwyf hefyd yn croesawu'r modd y mae hi'n dal sylw yn ei chwestiwn ar y berthynas rhwng Brexit a'r paratoadau ar gyfer Brexit heb gytundeb yn arbennig a phwysau cyni. Mae'r ddwy her hynny, rwy'n credu, yn rhoi pwysau arbennig o drwm ar bob rhan o'r Llywodraeth, gwasanaethau cyhoeddus ac, yn wir, y trydydd sector a'r sector preifat hefyd, felly rwy'n croesawu'r sylw yna. O ran y cwestiwn ynghylch hyd, roeddwn i mewn gwirionedd yn dyfynnu sylw Guy Verhofstadt ynglŷn â'r hyd. Bydd hi'n gwybod ein bod ni wedi nodi, yn ein barn ni, fod ailnegodi'r datganiad gwleidyddol i adlewyrchu'r math o egwyddorion a osododd ei phlaid hi a minnau ar y cyd yn 'Diogelu Dyfodol Cymru' yn rhywbeth y gellid ei wneud mewn amser cymharol fyr pryd na fyddai angen estyniad mor hir â hynny - y math o estyniad a roddwyd bellach gan y Cyngor Ewropeaidd. Ond mae'n amlwg, yn yr un modd, bod bodolaeth yr estyniad hwnnw yn adlewyrchu, rwy'n credu, ar eu rhan nhw, ymdeimlad o flinder o ran parhau i drin a thrafod ac, fel y bydden nhw'n ei ddisgrifio efallai, y tynnu sylw oddi ar y materion a'r blaenoriaethau eraill a fydd yn anochel gan ein cydweithwyr yn yr Undeb Ewropeaidd. Ond, ar ôl darparu'r estyniad sylweddol hwnnw, y sylw a wneuthum i oedd dweud yn syml fod angen inni barhau i bwyso i sicrhau bod y trafodaethau sydd ar y gweill yn ystyrlon ac nad ydyn nhw'n gweld y cyfnod hwnnw yn gyfnod o ddychwelyd i'r status quo ac efallai i ymdeimlad nad oes angen i ni ymgysylltu. Byddai hynny'n ddehongliad anghywir o'r cyfnod hwnnw o amser, o'r estyniad hwnnw. O ran y trafodaethau a gawsom ni gyda'r fainc flaen, yn amlwg, trafodaethau o fewn y blaid yw'r rheini, ond mae'n gwbl glir bod y rheini'n adlewyrchu'r egwyddorion a arddelwyd gennym ni yn gyhoeddus yma, ac, eto, fel y dywedaf, ar y cyd â'i phlaid yn 'Diogelu Dyfodol Cymru', er mwyn cysoni hawliau mewn modd deinamig, cael perthynas agos â'r farchnad sengl ac aelodaeth o undeb tollau, ymysg pethau eraill. A bydd hi'n gyfarwydd, rwy'n gwybod, â'r blaenoriaethau yr ydym ni wedi'u gosod ar y cyd. Rwyf wedi bod yn glir ac rwyf wedi defnyddio ieithwedd statudol a fyddai'n ei gwneud hi'n bosib cynnal trafodaethau cyfochrog â'r gweinyddiaethau datganoledig ynghylch datblygu'r trafodaethau ar y datganiad gwleidyddol. Rwy'n gwybod fod hynny'n uchelgais gan Lywodraeth yr Alban hefyd, na fydd yn syndod ganddi glywed. Ac, wedi ysgrifennu at David Lidington ar yr union bwynt hwnnw, fe wnes i hefyd holi eto ynghylch hynny mewn sgwrs gydag ef efallai bythefnos yn ôl i ddweud eto pa mor bwysig oedd hi i hynny barhau. Rwy'n croesawu'r sylw parhaus y mae'r Aelod yn ei roi ynghylch y mater hwn. Credaf, o ran paratoadau yn arbennig, ei sylw terfynol, i fod yn glir - rwy'n credu fy mod i wedi dweud hyn yn gyhoeddus o'r blaen - rydym ni wedi pwyso ar Lywodraeth y DU i sicrhau bod Llywodraeth y DU, sy'n bennaf gyfrifol am hyn, a'r Comisiwn Etholiadol, yn gweithredu. Codais hynny eto gyda David Lidington yn yr un sgwrs dim ond dwy neu dair wythnos yn ôl. A gwn hefyd fod Prif Weinidog Cymru wedi ysgrifennu at yr Ysgrifennydd Parhaol yn gofyn iddi ystyried beth y mae angen i Lywodraeth Cymru ei wneud er mwyn paratoi ar gyfer hynny. Ond bydd yn clywed o'm datganiad y sail statudol ar gyfer y rhan fwyaf o'r camau hynny, a San Steffan sy'n bennaf gyfrifol am y camau hynny.