English: Thank you very much for those comments from everyone and for the response from the Cabinet Secretary. A couple of comments from me - we heard the Cabinet Secretary saying there, 'This is as good as it gets', in relation to the evidence that we have. That doesn't give me much assurance, because there are many different ways where we could be looking for additional evidence, including something the Cabinet Secretary has referred to, of course, namely following carefully what has happened or what will be happening in Scotland, as a result of introducing this change there. I am prepared not to push this to a vote, because, possibly, commissioning additional independent research may not be what is needed - I accept that. But we do need some way to enable us to look again at ways of doing that in the next stage of the debate on this Bill, to ensure that all stones are overturned, as it where, by this Government in collecting the evidence and having the correct modelling. So, yes, perhaps commissioning an independent research projects is not the correct thing to do, because you might well turn to Sheffield for that particular investigation. So, I am happy not to push that to a vote. In relation to amendment 16, we heard the Cabinet Secretary say that there is a clear and specific purpose to this legislation. Yes, there is, I agree, but all legislation has direct implications and indirect implications, and those indirect implications can be negative ones and they can be positive. I do believe that there is a positive side effect to this particular piece of legislation in relation to having a more level playing field with the public houses. And I don't think we should be holding back from noting that, if we can, as we discuss this Bill. So, I will be asking for a vote on that, because this is where we will, through this Bill, be naming this particularly important sector in Wales as a formal consultee for the legislation that is before us.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn am y sylwadau gan bawb ar y mater a chan yr Ysgrifennydd Cabinet. Cwpwl o sylwadau gennyf i - mi glywsom ni'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet yn dweud yn y fan yna, ' This is as good as it gets ', o ran y dystiolaeth sydd gennym ni. Nid ydy hynny yn fy modloni i, oherwydd mae yna bob mathau o ffyrdd gwahanol lle gallem ni fod yn chwilio am dystiolaeth ychwanegol, gan gynnwys rhywbeth mae'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet ei hun wedi cyfeirio ato fo, wrth gwrs, sef dilyn yn ofalus beth sydd wedi digwydd neu beth fydd yn digwydd yn yr Alban, o ganlyniad i gyflwyno'r newid hwn yno. Rydw i'n fodlon peidio gwthio hwn i bleidlais, achos, o bosib, nid comisiynu ymchwil annibynnol ychwanegol sydd ei eisiau - mi wnaf dderbyn hynny. Ond mae eisiau rhyw fodd y gallwn ni chwilio eto am ffyrdd o wneud hynny yng nghymal nesaf y drafodaeth ar y Bil yma, i sicrhau bod pob carreg yn cael ei throi drosodd, fel petai, gan y Llywodraeth yma wrth gael y dystiolaeth a'r modelu cywir. Felly, ie, o bosibl, nid comisiynu ymchwiliad annibynnol ydy o, achos i Sheffield y byddech chi'n troi, o bosib, am yr ymchwiliad hwnnw. Felly, rydw i'n hapus i beidio â gwthio hynny i bleidlais. O ran gwelliant 16, mi glywsom ni'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet yn dweud bod yna bwrpas clir a phenodol i'r ddeddfwriaeth yma. Oes, rydw i'n cydfynd, ond mae gan bob deddfwriaeth oblygiadau uniongyrchol ac anuniongyrchol iddyn nhw, ac mae'r goblygiadau anuniongyrchol hynny yn gallu bod yn rhai negyddol ac yn rhai cadarnhaol. Rydw i wir yn credu bod yna sgileffaith gadarnhaol i'r darn yma o ddeddfwriaeth o ran hafalu'r tir efo tafarndai. Ac nid ydw i'n meddwl y dylem ni fod yn swil o nodi hynny, os gallwn ni, wrth inni drafod y Bil yma. Felly, mi fyddaf i'n gofyn am bleidlais ar hynny, oherwydd dyma le y byddwn ni, drwy'r Bil, yn enwi yn benodol y sector pwysig yma yng Nghymru fel ymgynghorai ffurfiol ar gyfer y ddeddfwriaeth sydd o'n blaenau ni.