techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Is the First Minister able to share with us the Welsh Government's assessment of the potential impact in terms of jobs on supplier firms in Wales of Honda's announcement today? Can he confirm that that may affect up to a dozen major suppliers, such as G-Tekt in Tredegar and Mitsui in my own constituency, as well as many more second tier and third tier suppliers? The Welsh automotive sector is one of our major industries, and yet we saw with coal and steel, didn't we, how that position can unravel very quickly with disastrous long-term consequences? Given that we've already seen 600 job losses announced at Ford and Schaeffler, and Chatham House has confirmed that Wales has seen the sharpest reduction in foreign direct investment since the referendum of all the nations and regions of the UK, does he agree that membership of the single market is absolutely critical to the survival of the Welsh automotive sector, and the health of the wider Welsh economy? Given that the only realistic path now to securing that is through a people's vote, is he able today to pledge his unequivocal, unalloyed support for that policy?
Welsh: A all y Prif Weinidog rannu â ni asesiad Llywodraeth Cymru o'r effaith bosibl o ran swyddi ar gwmnïau cyflenwi yng Nghymru yn sgil cyhoeddiad Honda heddiw? A all ef gadarnhau y gallai hynny effeithio ar hyd at ddwsin o gyflenwyr mawr, fel G-Tekt yn Nhredegar a Mitsui yn fy etholaeth i, yn ogystal â llawer mwy o gyflenwyr ail haen a thrydydd haen? Sector modurol Cymru yw un o'n prif ddiwydiannau, ac eto gwelsom gyda glo a dur, oni wnaethom, sut y gall y sefyllfa honno ddirywio'n gyflym iawn gyda chanlyniadau hirdymor trychinebus? O gofio bod colled o 600 o swyddi wedi ei chyhoeddi eisoes yn Ford a Schaeffler, a bod Chatham House wedi cadarnhau bod Cymru wedi gweld y gostyngiad cyflymaf i fuddsoddiad uniongyrchol tramor ers y refferendwm o holl wledydd a rhanbarthau'r DU, a yw'n cytuno bod aelodaeth o'r farchnad sengl yn gwbl hanfodol i oroesiad sector modurol Cymru, ac iechyd economi ehangach Cymru? O gofio mai'r unig lwybr realistig nawr i sicrhau hynny yw trwy bleidlais y bobl, a yw'n gallu addo ei gefnogaeth ddiamwys, ddigymysg i'r polisi hwnnw heddiw?
English: First Minister, on 22 January, you told this Chamber, 'the debate in Parliament over the next week is the last opportunity to rally around that form of Brexitbased around continued participation in the single market and a customs unionif that cannot be done,the only option thatremains is apublic vote to break the deadlock.' Now, that was widely interpreted as you saying that there was a deadline of seven days. Parliament failed to reach the deadline that you set, and here we are several weeks later. So, my question to you is very simple: what is your new deadline? Is it eight days' time to 27 February? Is it the end of this month? Is it in March? Or is it 10.59 p.m. on 29 March?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, ar 22 Ionawr, dywedasoch wrth y Siambr hon: 'y ddadl yn y Senedd dros yr wythnos nesaf yw'r cyfle olaf i gefnogi'r ffurf honno ar Brexitsy'n seiliedig yn y bôn ar barhau i gymryd rhan yn y farchnad sengl a'r undeb tollauos na ellir gwneud hynny,yr unig ddewis sydd ar ôl wedyn yw pleidlais gyhoeddus unigol er mwyn datrys yr anghytundeb llwyr.' Nawr, dehonglwyd hynny yn eang fel eich bod yn dweud bod terfyn amser o saith niwrnod. Methodd y Senedd â bodloni'r terfyn amser a bennwyd gennych chi, a dyma ni sawl wythnos yn ddiweddarach. Felly, mae fy nghwestiwn i chi yn syml iawn: beth yw eich terfyn amser newydd? Ai ymhen wyth diwrnod, sef 27 Chwefror? Ai diwedd y mis hwn? Ai ym mis Mawrth? Neu ai 10.59 p.m. ar 29 Mawrth?
English: Well, Llywydd, one of the things we surely all have learnt is that deadlines that the House of Commons appears to set and that the Government appears to set, when those days arrive, those deadlines are capable of evaporation and new deadlines being set. Now, I regret that. I regret very much indeed that the Prime Minister didn't take the advice of the document that we published jointly between Labour and Plaid Cymru here in the Assembly more than two years ago. Had she done that, then we would be in a very different position, I believe, in relation to our relations with the European Union. Nevertheless, to our frustration, the House of Commons continues to grapple with this matter, and deadlock, I believe, has not yet been reached. And we just have to be willing to hold our nerve to allow that opportunity to happen, always with our clear statement that if it cannot be resolved in that way, then the only democratically feasible answer that we have been able to identify is that the decision must go back to those who made it in the first instance.
Welsh: Wel, Llywydd, un o'r pethau yr ydym ni i gyd yn sicr wedi eu dysgu yw bod terfynau amser y mae'n ymddangos bod Tŷ'r Cyffredin yn eu pennu ac y mae'n ymddangos bod y Llywodraeth yn eu pennu, pan fydd y diwrnodau hynny'n cyrraedd, mae'n bosibl y gall y terfynau amser hynny ddiflannu ac y gall terfynau amser newydd gael eu pennu. Nawr, rwy'n gresynu at hynny. Rwy'n gresynu'n fawr iawn na chymerodd Prif Weinidog y DU gyngor y ddogfen a gyhoeddwyd ar y cyd gennym ni rhwng Llafur a Phlaid Cymru yma yn y Cynulliad fwy na dwy flynedd yn ôl. Pe byddai wedi gwneud hynny, yna byddem ni mewn sefyllfa wahanol iawn, rwy'n credu, o ran ein perthynas gyda'r Undeb Ewropeaidd. Serch hynny, er mawr rwystredigaeth i ni, mae Tŷ'r Cyffredin yn parhau i ymaflyd â'r mater hwn, ni chyrhaeddwyd anghytundeb llwyr eto, yn fy marn i. Ac mae'n rhaid i ni fod yn barod i gadw ein pennau i ganiatáu i'r cyfle hwnnw ddigwydd, bob amser gyda'n datganiad eglur os na ellir ei ddatrys yn y modd hwnnw, yna'r unig ateb democrataidd ymarferol yr ydym ni wedi gallu dod o hyd iddo yw bod yn rhaid i'r penderfyniad fynd yn ôl at y rhai â'i wnaeth yn y lle cyntaf.
English: Well, the policy of the Labour Party, Llywydd, is clear. It is the one set out in the September conference resolution, and it's the policy that I have supported ever since. I am in the fortunate position of being able to discuss these matters with Labour front-bench spokespeople: Sir Keir Starmer, who was here in Cardiff within the last two weeks; I was able to discuss it with Jeremy Corbyn when I was in London last week. I welcome his letter of 6 February. It was widely welcomed in Brussels as well as being an important contribution that had a chance, given a Government that was prepared to carry out genuine discussions and negotiations with others on the floor of the House of Commons. That letter offered a way to an agreement that could be struck, that could command a majority in the House of Commons and that could be supported at the European Union level as well. That's what my party wants to get out of all of this. It's only if the Government that is responsible for all of this, which has been in charge of all of this ever since the referendum - . It's only if they fail to move in a direction where a majority in the House of Commons can be secured that we will then have to do, as the Member has said - and I have agreed with him now for the third time this afternoon that, in those circumstances, the decision would have to return to the people who made it in the first instance.
Welsh: Wel, mae polisi'r Blaid Lafur, Llywydd, yn eglur. Y polisi yw'r un a nodwyd ym mhenderfyniad cynhadledd mis Medi, ac dyna'r polisi yr wyf i wedi ei gefnogi byth ers hynny. Rwyf i yn y sefyllfa ffodus o allu trafod y materion hyn gyda llefarwyr mainc flaen Llafur: Syr Keir Starmer, a oedd yma yng Nghaerdydd yn ystod y pythefnos diwethaf; roeddwn i'n gallu ei drafod gyda Jeremy Corbyn pan oeddwn i yn Llundain yr wythnos diwethaf. Rwy'n croesawu ei lythyr dyddiedig 6 Chwefror. Fe'i croesawyd yn eang ym Mrwsel hefyd fel cyfraniad pwysig a oedd â chyfle, pe byddai Llywodraeth a fyddai'n barod i gynnal trafodaethau a negodiadau gwirioneddol gydag eraill ar lawr Dŷ'r Cyffredin. Roedd y llythyr hwnnw yn cynnig ffordd i gytundeb y gellid ei daro, a allai sicrhau mwyafrif yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin ac y gellid ei gefnogi ar lefel yr Undeb Ewropeaidd hefyd. Dyna'r hyn y mae fy mhlaid i eisiau ei gael allan o hyn i gyd. Dim ond os gwnaiff y Llywodraeth sy'n gyfrifol am hyn i gyd, sydd wedi bod yn gyfrifol am hyn i gyd ers y refferendwm - . Dim ond os byddan nhw'n methu â symud i gyfeiriad lle gellir sicrhau mwyafrif yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin y bydd yn rhaid i ni wedyn wneud, fel y mae'r Aelod wedi ei ddweud - ac rwyf i wedi cytuno ag ef nawr am y trydydd tro y prynhawn yma, o dan yr amgylchiadau hynny, byddai'n rhaid i'r penderfyniad fynd yn ôl at y bobl a'i gwnaeth yn y lle cyntaf.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. Can I also add my condolences to the family of Paul Flynn? Although he was identified with Newport for many years, he was originally, by birth and upbringing, a Cardiffian, so both cities do lay some claim to him. I did contact Paul Flynn during the early stages of the referendum campaign. As he was a genuinely independently minded politician, I was interested, actually, where he stood on that, and I was very grateful for the e-mail I received back from him. I was not publicly known at the time, so I was quite chuffed to get his response, and he clarified his position. We were on opposite sides of the fence, as it turned out, but I was grateful for his response, and I know he has at least one person here who worked for him in the past, and, of course, as you mentioned, he was a supporter of devolution, so his legacy, in many ways, does live on. First Minister, a fortnight ago, you answered questions here in the Chamber from the Conservative leader, Paul Davies, in which you expressed the wishes of the Welsh Government to address the issues of Holocaust denial and the growing prevalence within society of anti-Semitism. Will you reiterate that those wishes still form your outlook and that the Welsh Labour Government is still genuinely committed to tackling these problems?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. A gaf innau hefyd ychwanegu fy nghydymdeimlad i deulu Paul Flynn? Er iddo gael ei gysylltu â Chasnewydd ers blynyddoedd lawer, brodor o Gaerdydd ydoedd yn wreiddiol, trwy enedigaeth a magwraeth, felly mae'r ddwy ddinas yn ei hawlio i ryw raddau. Cysylltais â Paul Flynn yn ystod cyfnod cynnar ymgyrch y refferendwm. Gan ei fod yn wleidydd wirioneddol annibynnol ei feddwl, roedd gen i ddiddordeb, a dweud y gwir, yn ei safbwynt ar hynny, ac roeddwn yn ddiolchgar iawn am yr e-bost a gefais yn ôl ganddo. Nid oeddwn yn adnabyddus i'r cyhoedd ar y pryd, felly roeddwn i'n falch iawn o gael ei ymateb, ac eglurodd ei safbwynt. Roeddem ni ar wahanol ochrau i'r ffens, fel y digwyddodd, ond roeddwn i'n ddiolchgar am ei ymateb, a gwn fod ganddo o leiaf un person yma a weithiodd iddo yn y gorffennol, ac, wrth gwrs, fel y dywedasoch, roedd yn gefnogol i ddatganoli, felly mae ei etifeddiaeth, mewn sawl ffordd, yn parhau. Prif Weinidog, bythefnos yn ôl, fe wnaethoch ch ateb cwestiynau yma yn y Siambr gan arweinydd y Ceidwadwyr, Paul Davies, pan fynegwyd dymuniadau Llywodraeth Cymru gennych i fynd i'r afael â materion gwadu'r Holocost a chyffredinrwydd cynyddol gwrth-Semitiaeth mewn cymdeithas. A wnewch chi ail-bwysleisio mai'r dymuniadau hynny yw eich safbwynt o hyd a bod Llywodraeth Lafur Cymru yn dal i fod yn wirioneddol ymrwymedig i fynd i'r afael â'r problemau hyn?
English: Llywydd, the Welsh Government is committed to challenging stigma wherever that takes place, to protecting the rights of all members of our society, whatever their faith or culture. That is absolutely the case in relation to anti-Semitism, but it is true in relation to forms of abuse that other communities in Wales have experienced, and we are committed to that right across the board.
Welsh: Llywydd, mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ymrwymo i herio stigma lle bynnag y bydd yn codi, i amddiffyn hawliau pob aelod o'n cymdeithas, beth bynnag fo'i ffydd neu ei ddiwylliant. Mae hynny'n hollol wir o ran gwrth-Semitiaeth, ond mae'n wir o ran mathau eraill o gam-drin y mae cymunedau eraill yng Nghymru wedi eu dioddef, ac rydym ni wedi ymrwymo i hynny yn gyffredinol.
English: Okay. Thank you, First Minister, for that commitment. I'm not sure that the Labour Party is likely to be an effective vehicle from which to tackle the specific problem of anti-Semitism, though. We saw yesterday that seven Labour MPs felt moved to leave the Labour Party. One of the reasons they cited being the increasing prevalence of anti-Semitism within the Labour Party. Indeed, one of them said that the Labour Party is now institutionally anti-Semitic. Now, we had a Welsh Government statement on this 18 months ago, which talked about training for officials to make them more aware of anti-Semitism and working with Victim Support Cymru to identify instances of this. Given that the problem appears to be increasing, does the Welsh Government now need to do more?
Welsh: Iawn. Diolch, Prif Weinidog, am yr ymrwymiad yna. Nid wyf i'n siŵr bod y Blaid Lafur yn debygol o fod yn gyfrwng effeithiol ar gyfer mynd i'r afael â'r broblem benodol o wrth-Semitiaeth, fodd bynnag. Ddoe, gwelsom fod saith o ASau Llafur yn teimlo y dylent adael y Blaid Lafur. Un o'r rhesymau a nodwyd ganddyn nhw yw'r achosion cynyddol o wrth-Semitiaeth o fewn y Blaid Lafur. Yn wir, dywedodd un ohonyn nhw fod y Blaid Lafur bellach yn sefydliadol wrth-Semitaidd. Nawr, cawsom ddatganiad Llywodraeth Cymru ar hyn 18 mis yn ôl, a gyfeiriodd at hyfforddiant i swyddogion i'w gwneud yn fwy ymwybodol o wrth-Semitiaeth a gweithio gyda Cymorth i Ddioddefwyr Cymru i nodi achosion o hyn. O ystyried ei bod yn ymddangos bod y broblem yn cynyddu, a oes angen i Lywodraeth Cymru wneud mwy erbyn hyn?
English: I think awareness training is very important and it is essential that, as new challenges emerge, people keep that up to date. And that is true not simply of people who work for the Welsh Government, it's true for people who work in the Welsh Government, and, Llywydd, I would say that it is true of any Member of this Assembly as well.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu bod hyfforddiant ymwybyddiaeth yn bwysig iawn ac mae'n hanfodol, wrth i heriau newydd ddod i'r amlwg, bod pobl yn cadw hwnnw'n gyfredol. Ac mae hynny'n wir nid yn unig am bobl sy'n gweithio i Lywodraeth Cymru, mae'n wir am bobl sy'n gweithio yn Llywodraeth Cymru, a, Llywydd, byddwn yn dweud ei fod yn wir am unrhyw Aelod o'r Cynulliad hwn hefyd.
English: Yes, I agree with your sentiments, First Minister. I do think you need to look closely at your own party. There has been one investigation by Shami Chakrabarti - [ Interrupution.] There has been one investigation by Shami Chakrabarti, which was rather undermined when she immediately joined the Labour Party. Then, within weeks of finishing the so-called inquiry, she was given a Labour frontbench seat in the House of Lords. Hers was clearly a whitewash rather than a genuine inquiry. We now have another inquiry going on in which your party's general secretary refuses to reveal how many complaints of anti-Semitism within the Labour Party she has received, because the truth is just too embarrassing. First Minister, how long can your Welsh Government go on pretending to be against this form of racism when your party is utterly riddled with this problem from top to bottom?
Welsh: Ie, rwy'n cytuno â'ch safbwyntiau, Prif Weinidog. Rwy'n credu bod angen i chi edrych yn ofalus ar eich plaid eich hun. Cafwyd un ymchwiliad gan Shami Chakrabarti - [ Torri ar draws.] Cafwyd un ymchwiliad gan Shami Chakrabarti, a danseiliwyd braidd pan ymunodd â'r Blaid Lafur yn syth. Yna, o fewn wythnosau i orffen yr ymchwiliad honedig, rhoddwyd sedd mainc flaen Llafur iddi yn Nhŷ'r Arglwyddi. Roedd yn amlwg mai achos o wyngalchu oedd hyn yn hytrach nag ymchwiliad gwirioneddol. Mae gennym ni ymchwiliad arall sy'n cael ei gynnal erbyn hyn, lle mae ysgrifennydd cyffredinol eich plaid yn gwrthod datgelu faint o gwynion o wrth-Semitiaeth o fewn y Blaid Lafur y mae wedi eu cael, gan fod y gwir yn achosi gormod o gywilydd. Prif Weinidog, am ba hyd y gall eich Llywodraeth Cymru barhau i esgus bod yn erbyn y math hwn o hiliaeth pan fod y broblem hon yn bodoli drwy eich plaid gyfan o'r brig i'r gwaelod?
English: Llywydd, it is like arriving in a parallel universe to receive questions from the party that embraces Tommy Robinson and the creed that he is prepared to advocate, and then asks for other parties to account for themselves. Let me be clear, Llywydd: there is absolutely no place in my party or anywhere else in Wales for prejudice against people of other races or religions. And that does not simply include those that the Member has referred to today, but all those others that, in the past, he has been prepared to attack in the position that he now occupies.
Welsh: Llywydd, mae fel cyrraedd bydysawd cyfochrog i gael cwestiynau gan y blaid sy'n croesawu Tommy Robinson a'r credo y mae'n barod i'w hyrwyddo, ac yna sy'n gofyn i bleidiau eraill esbonio eu hunain. Gadewch i mi fod yn eglur, Llywydd: does dim lle o gwbl yn fy mhlaid i nac yn unrhyw le arall yng Nghymru ar gyfer rhagfarn yn erbyn pobl o hiliau neu grefyddau eraill. Ac nid yw hynny'n cynnwys y rhai y mae'r Aelod wedi cyfeirio atyn nhw heddiw yn unig, ond at bob un arall y mae ef, yn y gorffennol, wedi bod yn barod i ymosod arnynt yn y swydd y mae ynddi erbyn hyn.
English: I thank the Member for that question. The independent review panel provided its final report to the Welsh Government on 3 October 2018. In November of that year, a written statement set out actions to be taken in this calendar year and beyond in response to that report.
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn yna. Darparodd y panel adolygu annibynnol ei adroddiad terfynol i Lywodraeth Cymru ar 3 Hydref 2018. Ym mis Tachwedd y flwyddyn honno, cyflwynodd datganiad ysgrifenedig y camau i'w cymryd yn y flwyddyn galendr hon a thu hwnt mewn ymateb i'r adroddiad hwnnw.
English: Well, I thank the Member for that and for the interest that I know she showed in the review itself. I know from my discussions with her that she wants to see a community and town council sector that is strong and that will stand up to scrutiny as well. I share the auditor general's concern at the continuing high number of community councils that have received qualified audit opinions. Now, the Member referred to 340 of them, and I think it's fair to say, as I'm sure she will acknowledge, that the majority of those are relatively minor infractions of submissions being made a few days beyond the deadline and sometimes the correct form not being used and so on. But there are examples where the difficulty goes beyond that and where there are public interest reports that the auditor general has had to publish because of his concern at probity in the way the public money has been used, and that is completely unacceptable. Now, the auditor general has now agreed that he will review the adequacy and effectiveness of the current audit arrangements to ensure that they are fit for this purpose, and that review will give us an opportunity to make sure that we have a regime in place that guarantees the community councils are independently accountable and that when they use public money, they do so in a way that is robust, that is defensible and that stands up to scrutiny from those outside the membership of those councils.
Welsh: Wel, diolch i'r Aelod am hynna ac am y diddordeb y gwn iddi ei ddangos yn yr adolygiad ei hun. Gwn o'm trafodaethau gyda hi ei bod hi eisiau gweld sector cynghorau cymuned a thref sydd yn gryf ac a fydd yn gallu gwrthsefyll craffu hefyd. Rwy'n rhannu pryder yr archwilydd cyffredinol gyda'r nifer uchel parhaus o gynghorau cymuned sydd wedi cael barnau archwilio amodol. Nawr, cyfeiriodd yr Aelod at 340 ohonyn nhw, ac rwy'n credu ei bod yn deg i ddweud, fel yr wyf i'n siŵr y gwnaiff hi gydnabod, fod y rhan fwyaf o'r rheini yn dramgwyddau cymharol fân o gyflwyniadau yn cael eu gwneud ychydig ddiwrnodau y tu hwnt i'r dyddiad terfyn a pheidio â defnyddio'r ffurflen gywir weithiau ac ati. Ond ceir enghreifftiau lle mae'r anhawster yn mynd y tu hwnt i hynny, a lle ceir adroddiadau buddiant cyhoeddus y bu'n rhaid i'r archwilydd cyffredinol eu cyhoeddi oherwydd ei bryder ynghylch cywirdeb yn y ffordd y defnyddiwyd arian cyhoeddus, ac mae hynny'n gwbl annerbyniol. Nawr, mae'r archwilydd cyffredinol wedi cytuno erbyn hyn y bydd yn adolygu digonolrwydd ac effeithiolrwydd y trefniadau archwilio presennol i sicrhau eu bod yn addas i'r diben hwn, a bydd yr adolygiad hwnnw yn rhoi cyfle i ni wneud yn siŵr bod gennym ni drefn ar waith sy'n sicrhau bod y cynghorau cymuned yn atebol yn annibynnol, a phan fyddan nhw'n defnyddio arian cyhoeddus, eu bod nhw'n gwneud hynny mewn ffordd sy'n gadarn, mewn modd y gellir ei amddiffyn ac sy'n gallu gwrthsefyll craffu gan y rhai o'r tu allan i aelodaeth y cynghorau hynny.
English: The First Minister will recall that one of the recommendations in the review was for the Government to explore how a pool of qualified clerks could be made available to support town and community councils in Wales. I'm very well aware that some of the smaller community councils in Mid and West Wales, the region I represent, sometimes struggle to find the right person to support their work, and that, of course, is crucial with regard to some of the issues that Janet Finch-Saunders has already raised. This issue of good governance and accountability can depend on having the right member of staff in place. Many of them are councillors who are doing this on a very, very part-time basis, unremunerated, giving a lot to their community, but they can't necessarily be expected to have as individuals that level of expertise, so they need that professional support. Can the First Minister tell us what steps the Government is taking to help support the supply of suitably qualified and experienced clerks for community councils?
Welsh: Bydd y Prif Weinidog yn cofio mai un o'r argymhellion yn yr adolygiad oedd i'r Llywodraeth archwilio sut y gellid sicrhau bod cronfa o glercod cymwysedig ar gael i gefnogi cynghorau tref a chymuned yng Nghymru. Rwy'n gwbl ymwybodol bod rhai o'r cynghorau cymuned llai yng Nghanolbarth a Gorllewin Cymru, y rhanbarth yr wyf i'n ei gynrychioli, weithiau'n cael trafferth i ddod o hyd i'r person cywir i gefnogi eu gwaith, ac mae hynny, wrth gwrs, yn hollbwysig o ran rhai o'r materion y mae Janet Finch-Saunders eisoes wedi eu codi. Gall y mater hwn o lywodraethu da ac atebolrwydd ddibynnu ar fod â'r aelod priodol o staff mewn swydd. Cynghorwyr yw llawer ohonyn nhw sy'n gwneud hyn ar sail rhan-amser dros ben, yn ddi-dâl, gan roi llawer i'w cymuned, ond ni ellir disgwyl iddyn nhw o reidrwydd fod â'r lefel honno o arbenigedd fel unigolion, felly mae angen y cymorth proffesiynol hwnnw arnyn nhw. A all y Prif Weinidog ddweud wrthym ni pa gamau y mae'r Llywodraeth yn eu cymryd er mwyn helpu i gynorthwyo cyflenwad clercod sydd â'r cymwysterau a'r profiad priodol i gynghorau cymuned?