English: Firstly, on the question of process, as I indicated in my statement last Wednesday to the press conference, the first stage of engagement of the external advisory group is the set of round-tables, and I'm hoping, as I indicated, I think, then, for a subset of that group to be an ongoing feature of our work. So, nothing has changed since I made the statement last Wednesday in relation to that. He asks about the geographic mix - yes, there are people from Wales, there are people from other parts of the UK, and there are people from other parts of the world, which is the kind of mix that I think I indicated I was hoping to achieve, so I'm pleased that we've been able to do that. In relation to business, there are entrepreneurs and people from a finance background on the panel, on the round-table - contributors. There is a bias towards a range of people who share our values in a very broad sense, just because we want to make sure that we can apply our values in a new context. That is our choice as a Government, to wish to continue applying the values that we were elected to deliver and believe very powerfully in. But we've also brought voices into that mix that may not share entirely those values, and so that's important. We have somebody there who has, in the past, worked for a Conservative Government. So, there is a more complex picture than I think his observations would have led us to believe. In the second set of questions around lockdown - well, I think I'll just repeat what the First Minister has said on this on a number of occasions. The document is part of the commitment by the Government to be as transparent as we can be in explaining to people in Wales the sorts of principles that are relevant to the decision to lift lockdown when the time comes, and the framework for making that decision. We take a different view about the values that are relevant to that set of choices. But I think, again, as the First Minister has said, publishing that document is an attempt to help shape that UK-wide norm. I think his question implies within it a sense of the Welsh Government doing something that is a deviation from the norm, if you like, where you take the Government in England's perspective as the foundational point. That's not how I see devolution. Governments across the UK are entitled to put forward a vision for how they think things can work, and, where we seek a four-nations basis, that's a contribution to that discussion of Governments in parity, and that, I think, is what the First Minister has done in publishing that document. He's right to say that the behavioural impact of COVID has been mixed, hasn't it, and I share with him, I think, a view that is to say that it may well be the case, as we come out of COVID, that people don't wish to continue some of those behaviours, And, some of them, you'd understand why that might be, because they obviously involve difficult choices. The point I was simply making was, where some of those behaviours are capable of contributing to broader objectives that we'd want to see, then we as a Government should try and see if we can continue supporting people to make those choices where they can. His basic message is: lift the restrictions as soon as possible. I think the point that has been repeatedly made on behalf of the Government is that the time for lifting the restriction is when it's possible to say to people in Wales that it is safe to do so. And the First Minister, I'm sure, will approach the task of considering the question of lifting lockdown with that very much in mind.
Welsh: Yn gyntaf, ar y cwestiwn ynglŷn â phroses, fel y nodais yn fy natganiad ddydd Mercher diwethaf i'r gynhadledd i'r wasg, cam cyntaf ymgysylltiad y grŵp cynghori allanol yw'r gyfres o drafodaethau bwrdd crwn, ac fel y nodais rwy'n credu, rwy'n gobeithio y bydd is-set o'r grŵp hwnnw'n nodwedd barhaus o'n gwaith. Felly, nid oes dim wedi newid ers imi wneud y datganiad ddydd Mercher diwethaf mewn perthynas â hynny. Mae'n holi am y cymysgedd daearyddol - oes, mae yna bobl o Gymru, mae yna bobl o rannau eraill o'r DU, ac mae yna bobl o rannau eraill o'r byd, sef y math o gymysgedd y credaf imi ddweud fy mod yn gobeithio ei gyflawni, felly rwy'n falch ein bod wedi gallu gwneud hynny. Mewn perthynas â busnes, mae yna entrepreneuriaid a phobl o gefndir cyllid ar y panel, ar y bwrdd crwn - cyfranwyr. Mae tueddiad tuag at amrywiaeth o bobl sy'n rhannu ein gwerthoedd mewn ystyr eang iawn, a hynny oherwydd ein bod eisiau gwneud yn siŵr y gallwn gymhwyso ein gwerthoedd mewn cyd-destun newydd. Ein dewis ni fel Llywodraeth yw hwnnw, i ddymuno parhau i gymhwyso'r gwerthoedd y cawsom ein hethol i'w cyflawni ac y credwn ynddynt yn gadarn iawn. Ond rydym hefyd wedi dod â lleisiau i mewn i'r cymysgedd hwnnw nad ydynt o bosibl yn rhannu'r gwerthoedd hynny'n llwyr, ac felly mae hynny'n bwysig. Mae gennym rywun yno sydd, yn y gorffennol, wedi gweithio i Lywodraeth Geidwadol. Felly, mae'r darlun yn fwy cymhleth nag y credaf y byddai ei sylwadau wedi ein harwain i gredu. Yn yr ail set o gwestiynau ynglŷn â'r cyfyngiadau symud - wel, rwy'n meddwl fy mod am ailadrodd yr hyn mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi'i ddweud am hyn ar sawl achlysur. Mae'r ddogfen yn rhan o ymrwymiad y Llywodraeth i fod mor dryloyw ag y gallwn fod wrth esbonio i bobl Cymru y mathau o egwyddorion sy'n berthnasol i'r penderfyniad i godi'r cyfyngiadau symud pan ddaw'r amser, a'r fframwaith ar gyfer gwneud y penderfyniad hwnnw. Mae gennym farn wahanol am y gwerthoedd sy'n berthnasol i'r gyfres honno o ddewisiadau. Ond unwaith eto, fel y mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi dweud, rwy'n credu bod cyhoeddi'r ddogfen honno'n ymgais i helpu i lunio'r norm hwnnw ledled y DU. Rwy'n credu bod ei gwestiwn yn awgrymu ymdeimlad fod Llywodraeth Cymru yn gwneud rhywbeth sy'n gwyro oddi wrth y norm, os mynnwch, lle rydych yn cymryd safbwynt y Llywodraeth yn Lloegr fel y pwynt sylfaenol. Nid dyna sut rwy'n gweld datganoli. Mae gan Lywodraethau ar draws y DU hawl i gyflwyno gweledigaeth ar gyfer sut y credant y gall pethau weithio, a lle rydym yn chwilio am sail ar gyfer y pedair gwlad, mae hwnnw'n gyfraniad at y drafodaeth ynghylch Llywodraethau cydradd, a chredaf mai dyna mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi'i wneud wrth gyhoeddi'r ddogfen honno. Mae'n iawn i ddweud bod effaith COVID ar ymddygiad wedi bod yn gymysg, onid yw, ac rwy'n rhannu ei farn, rwy'n credu, y gallai fod yn wir, wrth inni gefnu ar gyfyngiadau COVID, nad yw pobl yn dymuno parhau â rhai o'r patrymau ymddygiad hynny. A byddech yn deall pam y byddai rhai ohonynt yn teimlo felly, gan eu bod yn amlwg yn galw am wneud dewisiadau anodd. Y pwynt roeddwn yn ei wneud yn syml oedd, lle gallai rhai o'r patrymau ymddygiad gyfrannu at amcanion ehangach y byddem am eu gweld, dylem ni fel Llywodraeth geisio gweld a allwn barhau i gynorthwyo pobl i wneud y dewisiadau hynny lle gallant. Ei neges sylfaenol yw: codwch y cyfyngiadau cyn gynted ag y bo modd. Rwy'n credu mai'r pwynt sydd wedi cael ei wneud dro ar ôl tro ar ran y Llywodraeth yw mai'r amser ar gyfer codi'r cyfyngiadau yw pan fydd hi'n bosibl dweud wrth bobl yng Nghymru ei bod yn ddiogel i wneud hynny. A bydd y Prif Weinidog, rwy'n siŵr, yn mynd i'r afael â'r dasg o ystyried y cwestiwn ynghylch codi'r cyfyngiadau gyda hynny'n bendant iawn mewn cof.