English: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. If I may just begin with a personal note before I speak on behalf of CLAC. I'm just pleased to hear that there's been a recognition that the word 'care' needed closer definition. That's a point that's been raised in this Chamber before in the context of childcare, and I'm wondering, if that's within your remit, if perhaps that might need a bit of attention at some point in the future. On behalf of the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee, can I just say that we considered the regulations under items 4 and 5 at our meeting on 11 March, and those under item 6 on 18 March. We issued a clear point on the regulations under item 5, and draw attention to the reporting points we made for the regulations under items 4 and 6. In our report on item 4, that's the Regulated Adoption Services (Service Providers and Responsible Individuals) (Wales) Regulations 2019, we highlighted two technical points under Standing Order 21.2 (v). First, the phrase in regulation 2, 'approved by the service', in our view, required further explanation, especially because those words apply in the context of a criminal offence, which I think you mentioned, Minister. Secondly, we questioned why, under regulations 7 and 8, if the responsible individual is unable to fulfil their duties, the service provider does not have to ensure that there are arrangements in place for the service to comply with the requirements of Parts 11 to 15 of the regulations, because it does for Parts 3 to 10. The Welsh Government's response addresses these points and says that the meaning and drafting of the regulations is sufficiently clear. Obviously, it wasn't a point that we agreed with. That's why we raised it. As regards the merits point we raised under Standing Order 21.3 (ii), in line with its response to us, the Welsh Government has now published its summary of consultation responses, as required by section 27 of the regulation and inspection of social care Act 2016, and we're grateful for that. As regards the Regulated Services (Service Providers and Responsible Individuals) (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2019, our principal merits point under Standing Order 21.3 (ii) also related to the need to publish the consultation responses required by section 27 of the 2016 Act, and so that issue has also been addressed. In closing, I'd just like to highlight the following point, which is that we would have expected the summary of consultation responses to have been laid at the same time as the draft regulations were laid. We believe that was the intention of the Assembly when it approved the 2016 Act, including that specific section - section 27 (5). Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. Os caf i ddechrau gyda nodyn personol cyn imi siarad ar ran y Pwyllgor Materion Cyfansoddiadol a Deddfwriaethol. Rwy'n falch o glywed y bu cydnabyddiaeth bod angen diffiniad manylach o'r gair 'gofal'. Mae hynny'n sylw sydd wedi ei wneud yn y Siambr hon yng nghyd-destun gofal plant, ac rwy'n pendroni, os yw hynny o fewn eich cylch gwaith, a oes angen efallai rhoi ychydig o sylw i hynny ar ryw adeg yn y dyfodol. Ar ran y Pwyllgor Materion Cyfansoddiadol a Deddfwriaethol, a gaf i ddweud y gwnaethom ni ystyried y rheoliadau o dan eitemau 4 a 5 yn ein cyfarfod ar 11 Mawrth, a'r rhai o dan eitem 6 ar 18 Mawrth. Fe wnaethom ni gyhoeddi sylw clir ar y rheoliadau o dan eitem 5, gan dynnu sylw at y sylwadau a wnaethom ni yn ein hadroddiad ar gyfer y rheoliadau o dan eitemau 4 a 6. Yn ein hadroddiad ar eitem 4, sef Rheoliadau Gwasanaethau Mabwysiadu Rheoleiddiedig (Darparwyr Gwasanaethau ac Unigolion Cyfrifol) (Cymru) 2019, fe wnaethom ni dynnu sylw at ddau bwynt technegol o dan Reol Sefydlog 21.2 (v). Yn gyntaf, o ran yr ymadrodd yn rheoliad 2, roedd angen esboniad pellach ar 'a gymeradwywyd gan y gwasanaeth', yn ein barn ni, yn enwedig oherwydd bod y geiriau hynny yn berthnasol yng nghyd-destun trosedd, y credaf ichi sôn amdano, Gweinidog. Yn ail, fe wnaethom ni gwestiynu pam, o dan reoliadau 7 ac 8, os na all yr unigolyn cyfrifol gyflawni ei ddyletswyddau, nad oes rhaid i'r darparwr gwasanaeth sicrhau bod trefniadau ar waith i'r gwasanaeth gydymffurfio â gofynion Rhannau 11 i 15 y rheoliadau, gan ei fod yn gwneud hynny ar gyfer Rhannau 3 i 10. Mae ymateb Llywodraeth Cymru yn rhoi sylw i'r pwyntiau hyn ac yn dweud bod ystyr y rheoliadau a'r ffordd y cawsant eu drafftio yn ddigon clir. Yn amlwg, nid oedd hynny'n sylw yr oeddem ni'n cytuno ag ef. Dyna pam inni ei grybwyll. O ran y sylw ynghylch rhinweddau y gwnaethom ni ei grybwyll o dan Reol Sefydlog 21.3 (ii), yn unol â'i hymateb i ni, mae Llywodraeth Cymru bellach wedi cyhoeddi ei chrynodeb o'r ymatebion i'r ymgynghoriad, fel sy'n ofynnol gan adran 27 o Ddeddf rheoleiddio ac arolygu gofal cymdeithasol 2016, ac rydym ni'n ddiolchgar am hynny. O ran Rheoliadau Gwasanaethau Rheoleiddiedig (Darparwyr Gwasanaethau ac Unigolion Cyfrifol) (Cymru) (Diwygio) 2019, roedd ein prif sylw ynglŷn â rhinweddau o dan Reol Sefydlog 21.3 (ii) hefyd yn gysylltiedig â'r angen i gyhoeddi'r ymatebion i'r ymgynghoriad sy'n ofynnol o gan adran 27 o Ddeddf 2016, ac felly mae'r mater hwnnw wedi cael sylw hefyd. I gloi, hoffwn dynnu sylw at y manylyn canlynol, sef y byddem ni wedi disgwyl i'r crynodeb o'r ymatebion i'r ymgynghoriad gael ei gyflwyno ar yr un pryd ag y cafodd y rheoliadau drafft eu cyflwyno. Rydym ni'n credu mai dyna oedd bwriad y Cynulliad pan gymeradwyodd Deddf 2016, gan gynnwys yr adran benodol honno - adran 27 (5). Diolch.