techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Glorious sunshine saw Her Royal Highness the Princess Royal, our Prime Minister, the Rt Hon Theresa May, Fusilier Shenkin IV, the regimental goat, taken from our Great Orme, and 100,000 people lining the North Shore Promenade, providing rapturous applause in support of all those individuals and families who selflessly serve in our armed forces. This year, also marking the RAF centenary, it was particularly special to see the Red Arrows display conclude with the number 100 painted across the sky and followed by the RAF battle of Britain memorial flight. Llywydd - Deputy - I would like to take this opportunity to thank all those involved in organising and to those taking part in what was such a memorable event. This went some way in particular to acknowledge the brave and courageous commitment by our servicemen, servicewomen and veterans, and simply to say 'thank you'.
Welsh: Yn yr heulwen gogoneddus, daeth Ei Huchelder Brenhinol y Dywysoges Frenhinol, ein Prif Weinidog, y Gwir Anrhydeddus Theresa May, Ffiwsilwr Shenkin IV, yr afr gatrodol, oddi ar y Gogarth, a 100,000 o bobl i sefyll ar Bromenâd Traeth y Gogledd, gan gymeradwyo'n frwd i ddangos eu cefnogaeth i'r holl unigolion a theuluoedd sy'n gwasanaethu'n anhunanol yn ein lluoedd arfog. Eleni, sydd hefyd yn nodi canmlwyddiant yr awyrlu brenhinol, roedd yn arbennig o hyfryd gweld arddangosiad y Red Arrows yn dod i ben gyda'r rhif 100 wedi'i beintio ar draws yr awyr a'i ddilyn gan ehediad yr awyrlu brenhinol i goffáu Brwydr Prydain. Lywydd - Ddirprwy - hoffwn fanteisio ar y cyfle hwn i ddiolch i bawb a oedd yn rhan o'r trefniadau ac i'r rhai a gymerodd ran mewn digwyddiad mor hynod o gofiadwy. Cyfrannodd y digwyddiad yn arbennig i gydnabod ymrwymiad dewr ac eofn ein milwyr a'n cyn-filwyr, ac yn syml i ddweud 'Diolch'.
English: Item 5 on the agenda is a debate on the Children, Young People and Education Committee's report on its inquiry into the emotional mental health of children and young people, and I call on the Chair of that committee to move the motion. Lynne Neagle.
Welsh: Eitem 5 ar yr agenda yw dadl ar adroddiad y Pwyllgor Plant, Pobl Ifanc ac Addysg ar ei ymchwiliad i iechyd meddwl emosiynol plant a phobl ifanc, a galwaf ar Gadeirydd y pwyllgor hwnnw i wneud y cynnig. Lynne Neagle.
English: Hayden: 'My issues started around year 8, so I was about 13 or 14, and I was always offered a counsellor, but that would never really happen. So, I just sort of dealt with it on my own, and then, one day, it was just enough was enough; I didn't know where to turn to.'
Welsh: Hayden: 'Dechreuodd fy mhroblemau o gwmpas blwyddyn 8, felly roeddwn tua 13 neu 14, ac roeddwn yn cael cynnig cwnselydd bob amser, ond ni fyddai hynny byth yn digwydd mewn gwirionedd. Felly, roeddwn yn rhyw fath o ymdrin â'r peth ar fy mhen fy hun, ac yna, un diwrnod, digon oedd digon; nid oeddwn yn gwybod at bwy i droi.'
English: Tristan: 'It was just a taboo subject to talk about mental health and just how you're feeling, particularly for men it was, I know.'
Welsh: Tristan: 'Roedd siarad am iechyd meddwl a sut rydych yn teimlo yn dabŵ, yn enwedig i ddynion, rwy'n gwybod.'
English: Thomas: 'I think if I'd got these issues addressed a lot earlier, it wouldn't have boiled over to the point - .'
Welsh: Thomas: 'Pe bai'r problemau hyn wedi cael sylw yn llawer cynharach, ni fyddent wedi gwaethygu i'r pwynt - .'
English: Regan: 'I feel like there should be more access to support within schools and a lot more notice that that support is there, available for people.'
Welsh: Regan: 'Rwy'n teimlo y dylai fod mwy o fynediad at gymorth mewn ysgolion a llawer mwy o hysbysrwydd fod y cymorth hwnnw yno, ar gael i bobl.'
English: Tristan: 'Trying to help young people is different tools, so it's like exploring different avenues from a young age, like meditation, just yoga, it could be exercise - not just simply, "Oh, you're not feeling well; go and speak to someone." Life isn't like that. You're not going to have someone to talk to all the time, and that doesn't work for everyone.'
Welsh: Tristan: 'Mae angen dulliau gwahanol o geisio helpu pobl ifanc, felly mae'n debyg i archwilio gwahanol bosibiliadau o oedran ifanc, fel myfyrdod, fel ioga, gallai fod yn ymarfer corff - yn hytrach na dim ond dweud "O, nid ydych yn teimlo'n dda; ewch i siarad â rhywun". Nid yw bywyd yn gweithio felly. Nid ydych yn mynd i gael rhywun i siarad â hwy drwy'r amser, ac nid yw hynny'n gweithio i bawb.'
English: Thomas: 'If the teachers had a little bit of training, just enough to catch bad mental health - it doesn't matter if you have depression or anxiety, bad mental health is bad mental health. From not having enough sleep to worrying about exams, it all affects us.'
Welsh: Thomas: 'Pe bai'r athrawon wedi cael ychydig o hyfforddiant, digon i adnabod salwch meddwl - nid oes gwahaniaeth ai iselder neu orbryder rydych yn ei ddioddef, salwch meddwl yw salwch meddwl. O beidio â chael digon o gwsg i boeni am arholiadau, mae'n effeithio ar bawb ohonom.'
English: Thank you. There are a number of Members who wish to speak in this debate. Therefore, I will be applying the five-minute rule very strictly. So, it's no good looking at me and smiling if you've got another half a page. The answer will be 'no', the button will go off, and I will call the next speaker. I'm sorry to do that, but we have a number of people who want to speak who are not committee members, and I think that is a great testament to the work of the committee, that others want to take part. So, I just ask you all to bear in mind the five-minute rule strictly, and we'll see how we get on. Darren Millar.
Welsh: Diolch. Mae yna nifer o Aelodau sy'n dymuno siarad yn y ddadl. Felly, byddaf yn defnyddio'r rheol pum munud yn llym iawn. Felly, nid oes unrhyw ddiben i chi edrych arnaf a gwenu os oes gennych hanner tudalen arall. Yr ateb fydd 'na', byddaf yn gwasgu'r botwm ac yn galw'r siaradwr nesaf. Mae'n ddrwg gennyf wneud hynny, ond mae gennym nifer o bobl sy'n dymuno siarad nad ydynt yn aelodau o'r pwyllgor, ac rwy'n credu bod hynny'n tystio i waith y pwyllgor, fod eraill am gymryd rhan. Felly, gofynnaf i chi gadw at y rheol pum munud, a chawn weld sut yr aiff hi. Darren Millar.
English: Just reflecting on a point you made a little earlier about the practical implications of one of the recommendations, and David Melding made the point: the Permanent Secretary had assured the Public Accounts Committee that the Government would stop this practice of accepting things in principle and be clear when they were rejecting it. I've written to the Permanent Secretary again this morning, asking her to reinforce that ruling in the light of this report. There will be times, of course, when it's not possible to accept it, but do you accept that it would be better to be clear about the reasons for that rather than accepting in principle?
Welsh: Os caf ystyried pwynt a wnaethoch ychydig yn gynharach am oblygiadau ymarferol un o'r argymhellion, a gwnaeth David Melding y pwynt: roedd yr Ysgrifennydd Parhaol wedi sicrhau'r Pwyllgor Cyfrifon Cyhoeddus y byddai'r Llywodraeth yn rhoi'r gorau i'r arfer o dderbyn pethau mewn egwyddor ac yn dweud yn glir pan fyddent yn eu gwrthod. Ysgrifennais at yr Ysgrifennydd Parhaol unwaith eto y bore yma, yn gofyn iddi atgyfnerthu'r dyfarniad hwnnw yng ngoleuni'r adroddiad hwn. Bydd yna adegau, wrth gwrs, pan nad yw'n bosibl derbyn argymhelliad, ond a ydych yn derbyn y byddai'n well inni fod yn glir am y rhesymau dros hynny yn hytrach na derbyn mewn egwyddor?
English: Could I ask you to wind up, please?
Welsh: A gaf fi ofyn i chi ddirwyn i ben, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: Of course. Apologies, Deputy Presiding Officer. Therefore, can I finally thank the committee and the Chair again for their extensive engagement and their raising awareness of these issues? I also welcome the health committee's work that they're currently doing on suicide prevention, which is an important element to sit alongside this work. Deputy Presiding Officer, we can't allow any child or young person to feel that they have no-one to turn to, and I will, with Cabinet colleagues, work with the committee to secure the emotional and mental health support provision that we know we all need and we all need to deliver soon.
Welsh: Wrth gwrs. Ymddiheuriadau, Ddirprwy Lywydd. Felly, a gaf fi yn olaf ddiolch i'r pwyllgor a'r Cadeirydd eto am eu hymgysylltiad helaeth ac am godi ymwybyddiaeth o'r materion hyn? Hefyd, rwy'n croesawu'r gwaith y mae'r pwyllgor iechyd yn ei wneud ar hyn o bryd ar atal hunanladdiad, sy'n elfen bwysig ochr yn ochr â'r gwaith hwn. Ddirprwy Lywydd, ni allwn ganiatáu i unrhyw blentyn neu berson ifanc deimlo nad oes ganddynt neb i droi ato, a byddaf fi a chyd-Aelodau yn y Cabinet, yn gweithio gyda'r pwyllgor i sicrhau'r ddarpariaeth o gymorth iechyd emosiynol ac iechyd meddwl y gŵyr pawb ohonom fod angen inni ei darparu, a hynny'n fuan.
English: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. I wanted to bring to the attention of the Assembly these two reports, published in quick succession, at a juncture where I believe Wales has some critical choices to make. The first, published jointly by the House of Commons Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee and the Work and Pensions Committee on 6 May this year, opens with this stark paragraph: 'Carillion's rise and spectacular fall was a story of recklessness, hubris and greed. Its business model was a relentless dash for cash, driven by acquisitions, rising debt, expansion into new markets and exploitation of suppliers. It presented accounts that misrepresented the reality of the business, and increased its dividend every year, come what may. Long term obligations, such as adequately funding its pension schemes, were treated with contempt. Even as the company very publicly began to unravel, the board was concerned with increasing and protecting generous executive bonuses. Carillion was unsustainable. The mystery is not that it collapsed, but that it lasted so long.'
Welsh: Diolch, Ddirprwy Lywydd. Roeddwn yn awyddus i dynnu sylw'r Cynulliad at y ddau adroddiad hwn, a gyhoeddwyd un ar ôl y llall yn gyflym, ar adeg y credaf fod gan Gymru ddewisiadau hollbwysig i'w gwneud. Mae'r cyntaf, a gyhoeddwyd ar y cyd gan Bwyllgor Busnes, Ynni a Strategaeth Ddiwydiannol a Phwyllgor Gwaith a Phensiynau Tŷ'r Cyffredin ar 6 Mai eleni, yn agor gyda'r paragraff moel hwn: Roedd cynnydd a chwymp aruthrol Carillion yn stori o ryfyg, balchder a thrachwant. Ei fodel busnes oedd yr ysfa ddi-baid i wneud arian, wedi'i yrru gan gaffaeliadau, cynnydd mewn dyledion, ehangu i farchnadoedd newydd a manteisio ar gyflenwyr. Cyflwynodd gyfrifon a oedd yn camliwio realiti'r busnes, a chynyddodd ei ddifidend bob blwyddyn, doed a ddelo. Roedd rhwymedigaethau hirdymor, megis cyllid digonol ar gyfer ei gynlluniau pensiwn, yn cael eu trin gyda dirmyg. Hyd yn oed wrth i'r cwmni ddechrau ymddatod yn gyhoeddus iawn, roedd sylw'r bwrdd ar gynyddu a diogelu bonysau hael i'r swyddogion gweithredol. Roedd Carillion yn anghynaliadwy. Nid y ffaith ei fod wedi mynd i'r wal sy'n ddirgelwch, ond y ffaith iddo bara mor hir.
English: Yes, I'll wind up to say that I think this, in conjunction with the failure to control the obscenely high salaries of the very large companies, may undermine the whole process of large companies' business and it now needs reforming substantially.
Welsh: Ydw, fe ddof i ben drwy ddweud y credaf y gallai hyn, ochr yn ochr â'r methiant i reoli cyflogau anweddus o uchel y cwmnïau mawr iawn, danseilio proses fusnes gyfan y cwmnïau mawr a bellach, mae angen ei diwygio'n sylweddol.
English: I commend Lee Waters for bringing this motion before the Assembly this afternoon and for the succinctness and accuracy of his speech and its diagnosis. I agreed with everything that he said. This is a grotesque case. Carillion, which is what I want to concentrate on in particular, is a company that on its collapse has left £7 billion in liabilities, £2 billion of that to suppliers and £2.5 billion to the pension fund. I think it's important to recognise that this case is an example of failure at all levels. First and most obviously, of course, failure of management of those who had responsibility for running the company, as the report of the business committee in the House of Commons makes clear, and the non-executive directors failed to scrutinise the accounts, failed to challenge the corporate executives and utterly failed in all their duties. The top corporate executives utterly failed to manage the company with any degree of competence, and possibly honesty. That remains yet to be investigated.
Welsh: Rwy'n cymeradwyo Lee Waters am gyflwyno'r cynnig hwn gerbron y Cynulliad y prynhawn yma ac am natur gryno a chywir ei araith a'i diagnosis. Roeddwn yn cytuno â phopeth a ddywedodd. Mae hwn yn achos gwrthun. Mae Carillion, sef yr hyn rwyf am ganolbwyntio arno'n arbennig, yn gwmni sydd wedi gadael £7 biliwn mewn rhwymedigaethau wrth iddo fynd i'r wal, a £2 biliwn o hwnnw i gyflenwyr a £2.5 biliwn i'r gronfa bensiwn. Rwy'n meddwl ei bod hi'n bwysig cydnabod bod yr achos hwn yn enghraifft o fethiant ar bob lefel. Yn gyntaf ac yn fwyaf amlwg, wrth gwrs, methiant rheoli ar ran y rhai a oedd yn gyfrifol am redeg y cwmni, fel y mae adroddiad y pwyllgor busnes yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin ei wneud yn glir, gyda methiant y cyfarwyddwyr anweithredol i graffu ar y cyfrifon, a'u methiant i herio'r swyddogion gweithredol corfforaethol a'u methiant llwyr yn eu holl ddyletswyddau. Methodd y prif swyddogion gweithredol corfforaethol reoli'r cwmni gydag unrhyw gymhwysedd o gwbl, na gonestrwydd o bosibl. Mae hynny yn dal i gael ei ymchwilio.
English: Thank you very much, Dirprwy Lywydd. Can I thank all those Members who have brought forward this genuinely interesting debate this afternoon? We concentrate here, quite rightly, on reports produced by our own Assembly committees or by the Welsh Government. Sometimes, however, the issue at stake is so relevant to us that it is worthwhile debating reports prepared for others. Both Carillion and Capita have had a presence here in Wales. The accounts we've heard across the debate can leave no doubt that we should attend carefully to the lessons learned from experiences elsewhere. Dirprwy Lywydd, I'll have less to say on Capita because the lessons to be drawn from that report have been very well explored here, particularly by Dr Dai Lloyd, who covered much of the ground I would have covered myself. I think we should say, in general, that the report teaches us to beware of the headlong pursuit of unrealisable savings and that the promises by those whose thirst for business outstrips their appetite for the truth should always be looked at very carefully. Here was a company that, when it took over the contracts of real clinical sensitivity, had neither the staff, nor the knowledge, nor the basic systems in place to discharge their new obligations. Here was a Government that appeared to believe that outsourcing a service was also to absolve itself of its responsibilities to service users and citizens. Lee Waters suggested that it does not have to be that way, but Capita is a cautionary tale showing us how badly things can go wrong.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Ddirprwy Lywydd. Hoffwn ddiolch i'r holl Aelodau a gyflwynodd y ddadl wirioneddol ddiddorol hon y prynhawn yma. Rydym yn canolbwyntio yma, yn gwbl briodol, ar adroddiadau a gynhyrchwyd gan bwyllgorau ein Cynulliad ein hunain neu gan Lywodraeth Cymru. Weithiau, fodd bynnag, mae'r mater dan sylw mor berthnasol i ni fel ei bod yn werth trafod adroddiadau a baratowyd ar gyfer eraill. Mae Carillion a Capita wedi cael presenoldeb yma yng Nghymru. Ni fydd yr adroddiadau a glywsom yn ystod y ddadl yn gadael unrhyw amheuaeth y dylem wrando'n astud ar y gwersi a ddysgwyd o brofiadau mewn mannau eraill. Ddirprwy Lywydd, bydd gennyf lai i'w ddweud am Capita oherwydd bod y gwersi sydd i'w dysgu o'r adroddiad hwnnw wedi cael ystyriaeth fanwl iawn yma, yn arbennig gan Dr Dai Lloyd, sydd wedi ymdrin â llawer o'r tir y buaswn wedi rhoi sylw iddo fy hun. Credaf y dylem ddweud, yn gyffredinol, fod yr adroddiad yn ein dysgu i ochel rhag bwrw iddi'n ddall ar drywydd arbedion afrealistig ac y dylid edrych yn ofalus iawn bob amser ar yr addewidion a wnaed gan y rhai y mae eu syched am fusnes yn drech na'u hawydd am y gwirionedd. Dyma gwmni nad oedd ganddo staff, na gwybodaeth na systemau sylfaenol ar waith ar gyfer cyflawni ei rwymedigaethau newydd pan enillodd gontractau gwirioneddol sensitif yn glinigol. Dyma Lywodraeth a ymddangosai fel pe bai'n credu bod gosod gwasanaeth ar gontract allanol hefyd yn ei rhyddhau hi o'i chyfrifoldebau i ddefnyddwyr gwasanaethau a dinasyddion. Awgrymodd Lee Waters nad oes raid iddi fod felly, ond mae Capita yn stori sy'n ein rhybuddio pa mor wael y gall pethau fynd o chwith.
English: Of course, Mark.
Welsh: Wrth gwrs, Mark.
English: Thank you very much indeed, because I have lots of casework related to my cross-party group work and local work where people who should have had their personal independence payment at full rate haven't got it, but we know that an appeal to the DWP is somewhere between 60 and 80 per cent successful, particularly for those on the autism spectrum and those with sensory loss issues. The problem is a failure to understand and accept these conditions. But we also encounter the same problem with many public sector bodies, local authorities and health bodies. So, is it not the case that it's that lack of understanding we have to address, so that people in all sectors have the rights they have respected, and their needs met accordingly?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, oherwydd mae gennyf lawer o waith achos sy'n gysylltiedig â fy ngwaith grŵp trawsbleidiol a gwaith lleol lle mae pobl a ddylai fod wedi cael eu taliad annibyniaeth personol ar y gyfradd lawn heb ei gael, ond gwyddom mai 60 i 80 y cant o lwyddiant a geir o apelio at yr Adran Gwaith a Phensiynau, yn enwedig ar gyfer rhai ar y sbectrwm awtistig a'r rhai sydd â nam ar y synhwyrau. Y broblem yw methiant i ddeall a derbyn yr amodau hyn. Ond rydym hefyd yn wynebu'r un broblem gyda llawer o gyrff sector cyhoeddus, awdurdodau lleol a chyrff iechyd. Felly, onid yw'n wir mai'r diffyg dealltwriaeth hwnnw sy'n rhaid inni fynd i'r afael ag ef, fel bod pobl ym mhob sector yn cael yr hawliau sydd ganddynt wedi'u parchu, a'u hanghenion wedi'u diwallu yn unol â hynny?
English: I began by beginning with the point that the Member made, and it echoed what Jenny Rathbone had said earlier, that Capita is an outsourcing company that has very significant responsibilities in many areas of UK Government responsibilities and it is not equipped to discharge those responsibilities. Where I disagree with Mark Isherwood is this: when public service organisations get things wrong - and of course they do - then those organisations are accountable for what they do and voters are able to change the way that those services are provided. They have a choice at the ballot box. Whoever was able to vote to get rid of Capita? That, surely, is the fundamental difference.
Welsh: Dechreuais drwy ddechrau gyda'r pwynt a wnaeth yr Aelod, ac adleisiai'r hyn roedd Jenny Rathbone wedi'i ddweud yn gynharach, sef bod Capita yn gwmni contract allanol sydd â chyfrifoldebau sylweddol iawn mewn sawl un o feysydd cyfrifoldeb Llywodraeth y DU ac nid yw wedi'i gyfarparu i gyflawni'r cyfrifoldebau hynny. Rwy'n anghytuno â Mark Isherwood ar hyn: pan fo sefydliadau gwasanaeth cyhoeddus yn cael pethau'n anghywir - ac mae hynny'n digwydd wrth gwrs - mae'r sefydliadau hynny'n atebol am yr hyn a wnânt a gall pleidleiswyr newid y ffordd y darparir y gwasanaethau hynny. Mae ganddynt ddewis yn y blwch pleidleisio. Pwy allai bleidleisio i gael gwared ar Capita? Yn sicr, dyna yw'r gwahaniaeth sylfaenol.
English: I'm very grateful for you taking the intervention, but what happens when there's a failure in public services? We can't vote out the management of the Betsi Cadwaladr health board, for example. So, if you accept that that's a principle that you want to employ in relation to private businesses that engage with the public sector, what about public sector organisations that engage with governments too?
Welsh: Rwy'n ddiolchgar iawn i chi gymryd yr ymyriad, ond beth sy'n digwydd pan fo gwasanaethau cyhoeddus yn methu? Ni allwn bleidleisio dros gael gwared ar reolwyr bwrdd iechyd Betsi Cadwaladr, er enghraifft. Felly, os ydych yn derbyn bod honno'n egwyddor rydych chi am ei harfer mewn perthynas â busnesau preifat sy'n ymgysylltu â'r sector cyhoeddus, beth am sefydliadau sector cyhoeddus sy'n ymgysylltu â llywodraethau hefyd?
English: Well, Llywydd, people vote for the individuals who are responsible here for the health service here in Wales. People are able to make different decisions if they don't think that that is being done successfully. Whenever did Capita put itself up for election? Whenever were people in north Wales, affected by the problems that Mark Isherwood pointed out, able to go to the ballot box to get rid of that company? That's the essential difference: that's why the comparison between private companies and public services is not a fair or relevant one. I followed much of what Neil Hamilton said. His analysis, I thought, pointed to some very important issues. I draw a very different conclusion than he does from that analysis. He says that the problem with Capita and Carillion is that what we really need are more, and better, markets. My conclusion is much closer to Mick Antoniw's, that what Carillion and Capita demonstrate is the failure of the market model when it comes to delivering public services. They simply do not operate, and neither do those people who use them operate, in that economy-driven way.
Welsh: Wel, Lywydd, mae pobl yn pleidleisio dros yr unigolion sy'n gyfrifol yma am y gwasanaeth iechyd yng Nghymru. Gall pobl wneud penderfyniadau gwahanol os nad ydynt yn credu bod hynny'n cael ei gyflawni'n llwyddiannus. Pryd y safodd Capita etholiad? Pryd y gallodd pobl yng ngogledd Cymru, yr effeithiwyd arnynt gan y problemau a nododd Mark Isherwood, fynd i'r blwch pleidleisio i gael gwared ar y cwmni hwnnw? Dyna'r gwahaniaeth hanfodol: dyna pam nad yw'r gymhariaeth rhwng cwmnïau preifat a gwasanaethau cyhoeddus yn un deg na pherthnasol. Dilynais lawer o'r hyn a ddywedodd Neil Hamilton. Roeddwn i'n credu bod ei ddadansoddiad yn tynnu sylw at rai materion pwysig iawn. Rwy'n dod i gasgliad gwahanol iawn i'w un ef o'r dadansoddiad hwnnw. Dywed mai'r broblem gyda Capita a Carillion yw mai'r hyn sydd ei angen arnom mewn gwirionedd yw mwy o farchnadoedd, a marchnadoedd gwell. Mae fy nghasgliad i yn llawer nes at un Mick Antoniw, mai'r hyn y dengys Carillion a Capita yw methiant model y farchnad ar gyfer darparu gwasanaethau cyhoeddus. Ond nid yw'r gwasanaethau cyhoeddus yn gweithredu, ac nid yw'r bobl sy'n eu defnyddio'n gweithredu mewn modd a ysgogir gan yr economi.
English: Item 7 has been postponed until 19 September.
Welsh: Mae eitem 7 wedi'i gohirio tan 19 Medi.
English: We have nothing to vote on this afternoon.
Welsh: Nid oes gennym unrhyw beth i bleidleisio arno y prynhawn yma.
English: Well, thank you very much, Deputy Presiding Officer - [ Interruption. ]
Welsh: Wel, diolch yn fawr iawn, Dirprwy Lywydd - [ Torri ar draws. ]
English: Just a minute. If you're going out from the Chamber, please do so quickly, and, if not, if you're staying in to listen to the short debate, please pay attention. I will call the short debate now. Llyr Gruffydd.
Welsh: Un funud. Os ydych yn mynd allan o'r Siambr, gwnewch hynny'n gyflym, ac os nad ydych yn gwneud hynny, os ydych yn aros i wrando ar y ddadl fer, gwrandewch arni os gwelwch yn dda. Galwaf yn awr ar Llyr Gruffydd i gyflwyno'r ddadl fer.
English: Thank you. Can I now call the Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Transport to reply to the debate? Ken Skates.
Welsh: Diolch. A gaf fi alw yn awr ar Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros yr Economi a Thrafnidiaeth i ymateb i'r ddadl? Ken Skates.