English: Of course, I will also be highlighting a lot of the businesses that I've been frequenting locally in the debate later on, and of course I'll be sharing my secret on where I get my hair cut as well. [ Laughter.] And of course I'm very glad that the Minister says that he's engaging with businesses. More often than not, a lot of the ideas that solve a lot of the issues these businesses have come up on the coalface, so I'm glad that conversation is happening. If I could turn to trade and the Northern Ireland protocol, threats from the UK Government to trigger article 16 are not only concerning with respect to stability, peace and trade in Northern Ireland, but the triggering of article 16 would negatively impact Welsh trading relations with the EU. While Wales is trying to recover from the effects of years of austerity, Brexit and COVID-19, and of course we've already seen disruptions to trade at Holyhead, we cannot risk causing further disruption to the Welsh economy. Has the Minister had any clarification as to how the UK Government would plan to implement article 16, if they do so, and what the role of the devolved Governments would be in that process? Will we, for example, be able to raise concerns about the impact on Welsh trade and the Welsh economy, and what preparations, if any, have the Welsh Government made to cushion the blow to the Welsh economy in case article 16 is triggered? Toward the start of November, in the Economy, Trade, and Rural Affairs Committee, I asked the Minister about the timeline for an assessment of the cumulative impacts of the market-access provisions for agriculture in the New Zealand and Australia free trade agreements, and was told that it depends on the information provided and whether the agreements in principle become finalised. Has the Minister had any more details from the UK Government and is he able to share those details with me today?
Welsh: Wrth gwrs, byddaf innau hefyd yn tynnu sylw at lawer o'r busnesau lleol rwyf wedi bod yn eu defnyddio yn y ddadl yn nes ymlaen, ac wrth gwrs byddaf yn rhannu fy nghyfrinach ynglŷn â ble rwy'n cael fy ngwallt wedi'i dorri hefyd. [ Chwerthin.] Ac wrth gwrs rwy'n falch iawn fod y Gweinidog yn dweud ei fod yn ymgysylltu â busnesau. Yn amlach na pheidio, mae llawer o'r syniadau sy'n datrys llawer o'r problemau sy'n wynebu'r busnesau hyn wedi codi ar wyneb y gwaith felly rwy'n falch bod sgwrs yn digwydd. Os caf fi droi at fasnach a phrotocol Gogledd Iwerddon, mae bygythiadau gan Lywodraeth y DU i danio erthygl 16 nid yn unig yn peri pryder mewn perthynas â sefydlogrwydd, heddwch a masnach yng Ngogledd Iwerddon, ond byddai tanio erthygl 16 yn effeithio'n negyddol ar gysylltiadau masnachu Cymru â'r UE. Tra bo Cymru'n ceisio adfer o effeithiau blynyddoedd o gyni, Brexit a COVID-19, ac wrth gwrs rydym eisoes wedi gweld tarfu ar fasnach yng Nghaergybi, ni allwn greu risg o darfu pellach ar economi Cymru. A yw'r Gweinidog wedi cael unrhyw eglurhad ynghylch sut y mae Llywodraeth y DU yn bwriadu gweithredu erthygl 16, os byddant yn gwneud hynny, a beth fyddai rôl y Llywodraethau datganoledig yn y broses honno? A fyddwn, er enghraifft, yn gallu codi pryderon am yr effaith ar fasnach Cymru ac economi Cymru, a pha baratoadau, os o gwbl, y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi'u gwneud i leddfu'r ergyd i economi Cymru rhag ofn y bydd erthygl 16 yn cael ei thanio? Tua dechrau mis Tachwedd, ym Mhwyllgor yr Economi, Masnach a Materion Gwledig, gofynnais i'r Gweinidog am yr amserlen ar gyfer asesiad o effeithiau cronnol y darpariaethau mynediad i'r farchnad ar gyfer amaethyddiaeth yng nghytundebau masnach rydd Seland Newydd ac Awstralia, a dywedwyd wrthyf ei fod yn dibynnu ar y wybodaeth a ddarparwyd ac a yw'r cytundebau mewn egwyddor yn dod yn rhai terfynol. A yw'r Gweinidog wedi cael rhagor o fanylion gan Lywodraeth y DU ac a yw'n gallu rhannu'r manylion hynny â mi heddiw?