techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you for that question. Actually, I think I fundamentally disagree with many of the points that you made there. It's not for us to turn our back and say that just because we don't create the vast majority of the world's problem, we're not going to show leadership and do something about it. The responsibility is on all of us - individuals, communities, governments - to actually step up and show leadership on this issue and to play our part as responsible global citizens. And that's what we're hoping to do in Wales by actually being there: we're number one in the UK, second in Europe and third in the world. We should be using that and showing our leadership to use leverage to encourage others to take action. If we don't play our part, how do we expect others to play their part as well?
Welsh: Diolch ichi am y cwestiwn hwnnw. Mewn gwirionedd, credaf fy mod yn anghytuno'n llwyr â llawer o'r pwyntiau a wnaethoch. Nid mater i ni yw troi ein cefn a dweud mai dim ond am nad ydym yn creu'r mwyafrif helaeth o broblem y byd, nid ydym yn mynd i ddangos arweiniad a gwneud rhywbeth amdano. Mae cyfrifoldeb ar bob un ohonom - unigolion, cymunedau, llywodraethau - i fentro mewn gwirionedd a dangos arweiniad ar y mater hwn ac i chwarae ein rhan fel dinasyddion byd-eang cyfrifol. A dyna beth yr ydym yn gobeithio ei wneud yng Nghymru drwy fod yno: rydyn ni'n rhif un yn y DU, yn ail yn Ewrop ac yn drydydd yn y byd. Dylem fod yn defnyddio hynny a dangos ein harweiniad i ddylanwadu er mwyn annog eraill i weithredu. Os nad ydym yn chwarae ein rhan, sut ydych chi'n disgwyl i eraill chwarae eu rhan yn ogystal?
English: Thank you for that question. I'd like to congratulate you on being among the first to declare your support for the carrier bag charge in Wales, with us being the first in the UK. [ Interruption.] Yes, in the bad old days. I completely hear what you're saying in terms of the issues you're having on a local level. It is, of course, a matter for individual local authorities to determine the frequency of their residual waste collections in their areas, but certainly if you want to get in touch we can give consideration to some of the specific problems you're raising. In principle, we would support less frequent residual waste collections, provided that recycling and food waste collections are weekly, and also with separate arrangements for nappies and similar materials like that, so to tackle some of the issues in terms of - [ Interruption.] Yes. So, if the Member would like to get in touch about that in more detail, then it's something we could give some consideration to.
Welsh: Diolch ichi am y cwestiwn hwnnw. Hoffwn eich llongyfarch ar fod ymhlith y rhai cyntaf i ddatgan eich cefnogaeth i'r tâl am fagiau siopa yng Nghymru, ac ni yw'r cyntaf yn y DU. [ Torri ar draws.] Ie, yn yr hen ddyddiau drwg. Rwy'n deall yn llwyr yr hyn yr ydych yn ei ddweud o ran y materion yr ydych chi'n eu cael ar yn lleol. Mater i awdurdodau lleol unigol yw pennu amlder eu casgliadau gwastraff gweddilliol yn eu hardaloedd, ond yn sicr, wrth gwrs, os ydych am gysylltu â ni gallwn roi ystyriaeth i rai o'r problemau penodol yr ydych chi'n eu crybwyll. Mewn egwyddor, byddem yn cefnogi casgliadau gwastraff gweddilliol llai rheolaidd, cyhyd â bod ailgylchu a chasgliadau gwastraff bwyd yn wythnosol, a hefyd bod trefniadau ar wahân ar gyfer clytiau a deunyddiau tebyg fel hynny, felly er mwyn mynd i'r afael â rhai o'r materion o ran - [ Torri ar draws.] Ie. Felly, os hoffai'r Aelod gysylltu ynglŷn â hynny mewn mwy o fanylder, yna mae'n rhywbeth y gallem roi rhywfaint o ystyriaeth iddo.
English: The next item, therefore, on the agenda is the legislative consent motion on the Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Bill. I call on the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Services to move the motion - Vaughan Gething.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf, felly, ar ein hagenda ni yw'r cynnig cydsyniad deddfwriaethol ar y Mesur Ymosodiadau ar Weithwyr y Gwasanaethau Brys (Troseddau). Rwy'n galw ar yr Ysgrifennydd Cabinet dros Iechyd a Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol i wneud y cynnig - Vaughan Gething.
English: Thank you, Llywydd. The Health, Social Care and Sport Committee considered the LCM at its meeting on 11 January. I'm sure everyone in this Chamber will agree that we should welcome any measure that seeks to improve the protection for our front-line emergency workers: as we've heard, the police, fire service and those in the NHS - nurses and doctors and so on - by strengthening the law when certain offences are committed against them. We should also welcome the fact that, in the unfortunate event of an emergency worker being assaulted in the course of their duties, there are clauses in the Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Bill that will allow for the taking of samples from the person who carried out that assault if it is believed that the emergency worker has been exposed to the risk of transmission of infectious disease. That is to be welcomed as well. As well as enabling the worker to find out quickly if they are at risk of contracting an infectious disease, and taking swift action to address that, it will spare them the prolonged stress and worry of waiting for results, which can be weeks if not months. So, on the basis that taking forward these provisions in a UK Bill will mean that emergency workers in devolved services in Wales are afforded the same level of protection at the same time as those in England, the committee has no objection to the agreement of this motion. Thank you very much.
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Trafododd y Pwyllgor Iechyd, Gofal Cymdeithasol a Chwaraeon y memorandwm cydsyniad deddfwriaethol yma yn ei gyfarfod ar 11 Ionawr. Rwy'n siŵr y bydd pawb yn Siambr yn cytuno y dylid croesawu unrhyw fesur sy'n amcanu i wella diogelwch gweithwyr rheng flaen ein gwasanaethau brys: fel rydym ni wedi clywed, yr heddlu, gwasanaethau tân a gweithwyr yn y gwasanaethau iechyd - nyrsys a meddygon ac ati - drwy gryfhau'r gyfraith pan fo troseddau penodol yn cael eu cyflawni yn eu herbyn. Dylid croesawu hefyd, mewn sefyllfa anffodus lle bo gweithwyr brys yn cael eu hymosod arnynt wrth gyflawni eu gwaith, fod cymalau yn y Bil Ymosodiadau ar Weithwyr y Gwasanaethau Brys (Troseddau) a fydd yn caniatáu cymryd sampl gan y person a ymosododd ar y gweithwyr os credir y gallai'r gweithiwr brys fod â risg o gael clefyd heintus wedi'i drosglwyddo iddo. Mae hynny i'w groesawu hefyd. Yn ogystal â galluogi'r gweithiwr i ddarganfod yn gyflym a ydyw mewn perygl o fod wedi cael ei effeithio gan glefyd heintus, a chymryd camau cyflym i fynd i'r afael â hynny, bydd yn gysur meddwl i'r gweithiwr rhag y straen parhaus a'r pryder wrth ddisgwyl am ganlyniadau, sy'n gallu bod yn wythnosau os nad misoedd weithiau. Felly, gan y bydd cymeradwyo'r darpariaethau hyn mewn Bil y Deyrnas Unedig yn golygu bod gweithwyr brys mewn gwasanaethau datganoledig yng Nghymru yn cael yr un lefel o ddiogelwch yr un pryd â'r rheini yn Lloegr, nid oes gan y pwyllgor unrhyw wrthwynebiad i gytuno ar y cynnig hwn. Diolch yn fawr.
English: I will try to be brief, but I do want to first of all say congratulations to Chris Bryant for bringing this forward in Westminster, because I think it's an excellent Bill to have brought forward and it absolutely reflects the Welsh Conservatives' 2016 Assembly manifesto where we sought to strengthen laws on penalties. A quick bit of context, because everybody else has spoken about what the Bill will do: in 2017, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board alone saw 1,136 physical acts of assault against NHS staff, of which only 27 went to court - 27 the year before, 27 the year before that. That's a complete nonsense. In total in 2017 verbal and physical assaults against NHS workers came to - quick mathematics here - just under 7,000 cases. Of those 7,000 cases, 906 made it to court. We need to tell the public that when people are putting themselves on the line for the public, going out there to help you no matter what your cause is, you have got to treat people with absolute respect. We will be supporting this Bill. Well done, Chris Bryant. Well done, Darren, for having this in our manifesto last time.
Welsh: Fe geisiaf fod yn fyr, ond hoffwn yn gyntaf ddweud llongyfarchiadau i Chris Bryant am gyflwyno hyn yn San Steffan, oherwydd rwy'n credu bod hwn yn Fil rhagorol i'w ddwyn ymlaen ac mae'n adlewyrchu maniffesto Cynulliad 2016 y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig yn llwyr, pan wnaethom geisio cryfhau cyfreithiau ar gosbau. Ychydig o gyd-destun yn sydyn, oherwydd bod pawb arall wedi sôn am yr hyn y bydd y Bil yn ei wneud: yn 2017, bu 1,136 o ymosodiadau corfforol yn erbyn staff y GIG ym Mwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Abertawe Bro Morgannwg yn unig, a dim ond 27 o'r rheini aeth i'r llys - 27 y flwyddyn cynt, 27 y flwyddyn cyn hynny. Mae hynny'n lol llwyr. Yn 2017 daeth ymosodiadau geiriol a chorfforol yn erbyn gweithwyr y GIG i gyfanswm o - mathemateg cyflym yn y fan yma - ychydig yn llai na 7,000 o achosion. O'r 7,000 o achosion hynny, 906 a gyrhaeddodd y llys. Mae angen inni ddweud wrth y cyhoedd, pan fydd pobl yn peryglu eu hunain ar ran y cyhoedd, yn mynd allan yno i'ch helpu chi ni waeth beth yw'r sefyllfa, mae'n rhaid ichi drin pobl â pharch llwyr. Byddwn ni'n cefnogi'r Bil hwn. Da iawn, Chris Bryant. Da iawn chi, Darren, am roi hyn yn ein maniffesto y tro diwethaf.
English: I just want to make a few points on this, because I think this is a piece of legislation at Westminster that is very, very desirable and long overdue. It is an area where we might have considered legislating ourselves at some stage, but it's absolutely right that we have a certain degree of consistency in this area. I'd like to raise a number of points. It's all very well us talking about increasing the sentences and so on. The biggest problem that has arisen has been the lack of prosecutions, and I think we need to have a better understanding as to why that has occurred, because I remember the campaigns that we had for zero tolerance on assault in the health services. What happened to that? It certainly didn't result in an increase in prosecutions, and no matter what we set the sentences at, unless we actually ensure that there are prosecutions in these cases, then it will not actually have that impact. So, all I would suggest is this: I think that this is something that's eminently worthy of support, and congratulations to Chris Bryant for actually taking this forward, but this is a matter that we do need to keep under review ourselves, because if, over the coming years, it is not having the desired effect, we may want to look ourselves at the issue as to how the legislation's working -
Welsh: Hoffwn i wneud ychydig o sylwadau ar hyn, oherwydd rwy'n credu bod hwn yn ddarn o ddeddfwriaeth yn San Steffan sy'n ddymunol iawn, iawn, ac yn hir-ddisgwyliedig. Mae'n faes lle yr ydym efallai wedi ystyried deddfu ein hunain ar ryw adeg, ond mae'n hollol iawn bod gennym rywfaint o gysondeb yn y maes hwn. Hoffwn i godi nifer o bwyntiau. Mae'n iawn inni sôn am gynyddu'r dedfrydau ac ati. Diffyg erlyniadau yw'r broblem fwyaf sydd wedi codi, ac rwy'n credu bod angen inni gael gwell dealltwriaeth ynghylch pam mae hynny wedi digwydd, oherwydd rwy'n cofio'r ymgyrchoedd a gawsom dros ddim goddefgarwch ar ymosodiad yn y gwasanaethau iechyd. Beth ddigwyddodd i hynny? Yn sicr ni arweiniodd at gynnydd yn nifer yr erlyniadau, ac ni waeth beth pa ddedfrydau yr ydym ni'n eu gosod, oni bai ein bod yn sicrhau y ceir erlyniadau mewn achosion o'r fath mewn gwirionedd, yna ni cheir yr effaith honno mewn gwirionedd. Felly, y cyfan y byddwn i'n ei awgrymu yw hyn: rwy'n credu bod hyn yn rhywbeth sy'n gwbl deilwng o gefnogaeth, a llongyfarchiadau i Chris Bryant am symud ymlaen â hyn, ond mae hyn yn fater y mae angen inni gadw dan adolygiad ein hunain, oherwydd os, dros y blynyddoedd nesaf , nad yw'n cael yr effaith a ddymunir, efallai y byddwn ni eisiau edrych ein hunain ar y mater ynghylch sut y mae'r ddeddfwriaeth yn gweithio -
English: It's just to say that I absolutely agree with you and I wonder if there may be a case for asking the Counsel General if he would review why there's been so few prosecutions. Going back to my ABMU case, year after year they've had the highest number of assaults and the least number of prosecutions. So, I think you're absolutely right in identifying that something, somewhere is going wrong and we have to send out a strong message that it's not acceptable to assault people.
Welsh: Dim ond i ddweud fy mod i'n cytuno'n llwyr â chi ac roeddwn i'n meddwl tybed a allai fod achos dros ofyn i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol a wnaiff ef adolygu pam y mae cyn lleied o erlyniadau wedi bod. I fynd yn ôl i fy achos ym Mwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Abertawe Bro Morgannwg, flwyddyn ar ôl blwyddyn maen nhw wedi cael y nifer uchaf o ymosodiadau a'r nifer isaf o erlyniadau. Felly, rwy'n credu eich bod yn llygad eich lle i nodi bod rhywbeth, rhywle yn mynd o'i le ac mae'n rhaid inni anfon neges gref nad yw'n dderbyniol i ymosod ar bobl.
English: I agree with that. There was some debate of this in Westminster, where the evidence recalled that with some of the sentences where there were prosecutions it was so paltry that it was an attitude of, 'Well, it's not worth the trouble. It's not worth actually doing it'. I think there's actually a broader imbalance in criminal prosecutions within our society, to the extent that there is a greater likelihood of prosecuting someone over a theft, over a welfare benefit offence than an unprovoked assault, for example, and I think that is the issue that goes throughout our criminal justice system. But, in particular, the need to actually emphasise the importance of the role of emergency workers who are serving the public and ensuring that they are protected I think is absolutely essential. But I think it would be, yes, a very good idea to monitor this, and it could be a function of the Counsel General to actually do this, but also to engage with the Crown Prosecution Service as to ensuring that, when this legislation goes through, there is a presumption of a prosecution and there is a review of the sentences that are then handed down and there is then also, I think, engagement with the sentencing guidelines body to ensure that the sentencing guidelines are particularly clear, because otherwise this important legislation may not have the desired effect.
Welsh: Rwy'n cytuno â hynny. Bu rhywfaint o drafodaeth ar hyn yn San Steffan, lle roedd y dystiolaeth yn nodi, yn achos rhai o'r dedfrydau lle y cafwyd erlyniadau, roedd y ddedfryd mor bitw, fod yna agwedd o 'Wel, nid yw'n werth y drafferth. Nid yw'n werth ei gwneud mewn gwirionedd'. Rwy'n credu y ceir anghydbwysedd ehangach mewn gwirionedd o ran erlyniadau troseddol o fewn ein cymdeithas, i'r graddau ei bod yn fwy tebygol cael erlyniad am ladrad, am drosedd budd-daliadau nag mewn achos o ymosodiad direswm, er enghraifft, ac rwy'n credu bod hynny'n fater ym mhob ran o'n system cyfiawnder troseddol. Ond, yn benodol, mae'n gwbl hanfodol yn fy marn i, i bwysleisio pwysigrwydd gwaith y gweithwyr brys sy'n gwasanaethu'r cyhoedd a'r angen i sicrhau eu bod wedi eu diogelu. Ond rwy'n credu y byddai, byddai, yn syniad da iawn i fonitro hyn, a gallai fod yn swyddogaeth i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol wneud hyn mewn gwirionedd, ond hefyd i ymgysylltu â Gwasanaeth Erlyn y Goron er mwyn sicrhau, pan fydd y ddeddfwriaeth hon yn mynd drwyddo, fod yna ragdybiaeth o erlyniad a bod adolygiad o'r dedfrydau a ddosberthir wedyn, a bod yna hefyd, rwy'n credu, ymgysylltiad â'r corff canllawiau dedfrydu i sicrhau bod y canllawiau dedfrydu yn arbennig o glir, oherwydd fel arall efallai na fydd y ddeddfwriaeth bwysig hon yn cael yr effaith a ddymunir.
English: I'd like to thank Members for their support for the Bill proposed by Chris Bryant. I look forward to Members voting in favour of it, and I note the comments made by both Angela Burns and Mick Antoniw on the broader issues about the criminal justice system actually taking up complaints over assaults against emergency services workers. I look forward to working with Members across the Chamber and, indeed, colleagues in Government on doing something about that too. Many thanks.
Welsh: Hoffwn i ddiolch i Aelodau am eu cefnogaeth i'r Bil arfaethedig gan Chris Bryant. Rwy'n edrych ymlaen at weld Aelodau yn pleidleisio o'i blaid, ac rwy'n nodi'r sylwadau a wnaed gan Angela Burns a Mick Antoniw ar y materion ehangach am y system cyfiawnder troseddol yn cymryd camau gwirioneddol yn achos cwynion am ymosodiadau ar weithwyr gwasanaethau brys. Rwy'n edrych ymlaen at weithio gyda'r Aelodau ar draws y Siambr ac, yn wir, cyd-Aelodau yn y Llywodraeth, i wneud rhywbeth ynghylch hynny hefyd. Llawer o ddiolch.
English: That brings today's proceedings to a close.
Welsh: Daw hynny â'n trafodaethau am y dydd i ben.
English: I will speak in Welsh, if that's okay. In terms of the statements that we have made, and the things that we have found out, there's a lot of information out there in relation to the system and how to submit any information, but what we saw at the heart of that was that it wasn't being communicated in an accessible manner for the broad range of people who come through the doors of the Assembly, whether they are visitors or workers, and, as Cerys mentioned, we see so many different people as part of this building - people coming into this building, but also people who work here - and we feel the need is there for us to be promoting and to be communicating the process in a clear way rather than it being in a long document. I think that what is missing is that there is a lack of clear communication with the audiences that you work with. Therefore, that is one opening comment that I would perhaps make in terms of looking into the processes and delving into the research that was required for today. So, if you are aware of the processes and systems of the Assembly, you will be confident; you will know that you have the standards commissioner, for example, and that you can make a direct complaint that commissioner. However, if you don't have any idea of what the processes of the Assembly are and its internal systems, then I would feel that you wouldn't know where to turn. That was where I started from initially.
Welsh: - siarad yn Gymraeg, os yw hynny'n iawn. O ran beth sydd gennym ni, o ran ein datganiadau ni, felly, beth rydym ni wedi ei ddarganfod ydy bod yna lot o wybodaeth allan yna o ran systemau sut i gyflwyno, ond beth roeddem ni'n ei weld wrth wraidd hynny ydy nad yw'n cyfathrebu'n hygyrch ar gyfer yr ystod eang o bobl sy'n dod trwy ddrysau'r Cynulliad, boed yn ymwelwyr neu boed yn weithwyr, ac, fel yr oedd Cerys yn ei ddweud yn fanna, rydw i'n meddwl bod yna gymaint o bobl wahanol rydym ni'n eu gweld yn rhan o'n hadeilad ni - yn dod i mewn i fan hyn, felly, ond hefyd o ran y gweithle - ac rydw i'n meddwl bod yr angen yna i fod yn hyrwyddo ac yn cyfathrebu'r broses yn glir yn hytrach nag ei bod hi mewn dogfen hir. Rydw i'n meddwl beth sydd ar goll ydy bod yna ddiffyg cyfathrebu clir efo'r cynulleidfaoedd rydych chi'n gweithio efo nhw. Felly, un sylwad agoriadol sydd gen i o ran edrych mewn i'r prosesau ac ymchwilio yn arwain at heddiw ydy, efallai, os ydych chi'n ymwybodol iawn o brosesau a systemau'r Cynulliad, byddwch chi'n hyderus yn gwybod bod gennych chi standards commissioner, er enghraifft, a'ch bod chi'n gallu cwyno yn uniongyrchol at y comisiynydd hynny. Ond, os nad oes gennych glem am beth yw prosesau'r Cynulliad a'r systemau mewnol, rydw i'n teimlo efallai na fuasech chi'n gwybod lle i droi; dyna oedd fy nheimladau cychwynnol i, felly.
English: Thank you, Chair. I agree with the need for this wider cultural change, which clearly is something that needs to happen. But, of course, we're reviewing the code of conduct, so one aspect of that widrt change is what we're focusing specifically on, although, of course, it's important that we have that broader discussion, and I think that this committee is one way of addressing some of those other issues. One point that has arisen a couple of times in the evidence, and in what you've said this morning, is this lack of clarity regarding what inappropriate behaviour is. Should there be a list, or - ? That is, we receive advice quite often that, as you start to draw up lists and include things, you then also exclude other things, so there is a danger in that sense. I would just like to hear, perhaps, some ideas about how we can capture that list, without being too prescriptive, because there will always be other things that aren't on the list.
Welsh: Diolch, Gadeirydd. Rwy'n cytuno ynglŷn â'r angen i gael y newid diwylliannol ehangach yma, sydd yn rhywbeth yn amlwg sydd angen digwydd. Ond, wrth gwrs, adolygu'r cod ymddygiad rŷm ni'n ei wneud, felly un agwedd o'r newid ehangach yna yw'r hyn rydym ni yn ffocysu'n benodol arno fe, er, wrth gwrs, mae'n bwysig ein bod ni'n cael y drafodaeth ehangach yna, ac rwy'n teimlo bod y pwyllgor yma yn un ffordd o fynd i'r afael â rhai o'r materion eraill yna. Un pwynt sydd wedi codi ei ben gwpwl o weithiau yn y dystiolaeth, ac yn yr hyn rydych chi wedi ei ddweud y bore yma, yw'r diffyg eglurder yma ynglŷn â beth yw ymddygiad amhriodol. A ddylai fod yna restr, neu - ? Hynny yw, rŷm ni'n cael cyngor yn aml iawn, wrth i chi ddechrau creu rhestrau, yna, wrth gynnwys pethau, rŷch chi hefyd yn eithrio pethau eraill, ac wedyn mae yna berygl yn hynny o beth. Wedyn, byddwn i jest yn licio clywed, efallai, rai syniadau ynglŷn â sut allwn ni fod yn dal y rhestr yna, heb efallai fod yn rhy prescriptive, oherwydd mi fydd wastad yna bethau eraill sydd ddim ar y rhestr.