techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, Llywydd, David Rees makes a really important point. The changes are to a Bill that the Prime Minister himself put in front of the House of Commons only in October - the Bill he was then prepared to support. The changes in the most recent version of the Bill make things worse from the point of view of Wales and not better. Why has the Prime Minister reneged on the commitment that he made in October on unaccompanied child refugees? Why has that been taken out of this Bill? Why has the parliamentary oversight that he was prepared to agree in October, why has that been taken out of this Bill now? Why when there was an agreement with his predecessor that a transition period could be extended if the United Kingdom believed it was in the United Kingdom's interests for it to be extended - nobody was imposing an extension, it was if a UK Government believed it was the right thing to do - why is he denying his own Government the ability to do that? On so many points set out in our legislative consent memorandum, this Bill is a worse Bill than the same Prime Minister produced in October.
Welsh: Wel, Llywydd, mae David Rees yn gwneud pwynt pwysig iawn. Mae'r newidiadau i Fil a gyflwynwyd gan Brif Weinidog y DU ei hun gerbron Tŷ'r Cyffredin ddim ond ym mis Hydref - y Bil yr oedd yn barod i'w gefnogi ar y pryd. Mae'r newidiadau yn fersiwn ddiweddaraf y Bil yn gwneud pethau'n waeth o safbwynt Cymru ac nid yn well. Pam mae Prif Weinidog y DU wedi torri'r ymrwymiad a wnaeth ym mis Hydref ar ffoaduriaid sy'n blant ar eu pennau eu hunain? Pam y tynnwyd hynny o'r Bil hwn? Pam mae'r trosolwg seneddol yr oedd yn barod i gytuno arno ym mis Hydref, pam mae hwnnw wedi ei dynnu o'r Bil hwn nawr? Pam, pan roedd cytundeb gyda'i ragflaenydd y gellid ymestyn cyfnod pontio pe byddai'r Deyrnas Unedig yn credu ei fod er budd y Deyrnas Unedig iddo gael ei ymestyn - nid oedd neb yn gorfodi estyniad, roedd pe byddai Llywodraeth y DU yn credu mai dyna fyddai'r peth iawn i'w wneud - pam mae'n amddifadu ei Lywodraeth ei hun o'r gallu i wneud hynny? Ar gynifer o bwyntiau a nodir yn ein memorandwm cydsyniad deddfwriaethol, mae'r Bil hwn yn Fil gwaeth na'r un a luniwyd gan yr un Prif Weinidog ym mis Hydref.
English: I thank the Member for the question. Thirty-eight per cent of social workers that are regulated by Care Inspectorate Wales have the ability to speak Welsh. The Welsh Government is working to encourage more Welsh speakers to work in this important sector.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn. Mae gan 38 y cant o weithwyr cymdeithasol sy'n cael eu rheoleiddio gan Arolygiaeth Gofal Cymru allu yn yr iaith Gymraeg. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn gweithredu i annog mwy o siaradwyr Cymraeg i weithio yn y sector pwysig hwn.
English: The fact that a health board operating under Welsh language standards could even consider moving a dementia patient who is Welsh speaking to England where care through the medium of Welsh would not be available, that is undoubted proof that Welsh language standards in health are entirely deficient. This is what happened over the Christmas period in the case of an elderly dementia patient from Ynys Môn. Plaid Cymru and others have argued from the very outset that the health standards are far too weak. Doesn't this case mean that we must introduce new standards that are firm and robust, and to do so as a matter of urgency? And doesn't this case also prove that there is a lack of understanding of the importance of Welsh-medium care? The case demonstrates that the Welsh language is seen as something that is peripheral or desirable in terms of care rather than being a central part of that care in terms of the quality of life and safety of those individuals involved. So, what do you intend to do in order to ensure that this important principle is rooted in our health and care regime in Wales?
Welsh: Mae'r ffaith y gall bwrdd iechyd sy'n gweithredu o dan safonau'r iaith Gymraeg hyd yn oed ystyried symud claf dementia Cymraeg ei iaith i Loegr lle na fyddai gofal yn y Gymraeg, mae hynny yn brawf diamheuol fod safonau'r Gymraeg yn y maes iechyd yn gwbl, gwbl ddiffygiol. Dyma ddigwyddodd dros y Nadolig yn achos claf dementia oedrannus o Ynys Môn. Mae Plaid Cymru ac eraill wedi dadlau o'r cychwyn cyntaf fod y safonau iechyd yn llawer rhy wan. Onid ydy'r achos yma yn golygu bod yn rhaid cyflwyno safonau newydd, cadarn a hynny ar frys? Ac onid ydy'r achos yma hefyd yn profi diffyg dealltwriaeth am bwysigrwydd gofal yn y Gymraeg? Mae'r achos yn dangos bod y Gymraeg yn cael ei gweld fel rhywbeth ymylol neu ddymunol i'r gofal yn hytrach nag yn rhan hanfodol ohono fo o safbwynt diogelwch ac ansawdd bywyd yr unigolion. Beth ydych chi'n bwriadu ei wneud er mwyn gwreiddio'r egwyddor pwysig yma yn ein cyfundrefn gofal ac iechyd yng Nghymru?
English: Well, Llywydd, it's one thing to say that there is a case to do more in terms of regulating how the Welsh language should be used in the health sector, and it's up to each one of us to agree or disagree with that, but what I don't agree with the Member on is trying to reflect the general situation from the specific case of a patient in Ynys Môn. As I understand it, he still resides in Wales; he hasn't moved. And the reasons were clinical reasons. That was why the decision had been taken. Now, the situation has improved and the patient himself has improved and it's possible to treat him here in Wales.
Welsh: Wel, Llywydd, mae'n un peth i ddweud bod achos yna i wneud mwy yn y maes i reoleiddio sut mae'r iaith Gymraeg yn cael ei defnyddio yn y maes iechyd, ac y mae lan i bob un ohonom ni i gytuno neu anghytuno â hwnna, ond beth dwi ddim yn cytuno â'r Aelod arno yw i dreial tynnu'r achos gyffredinol i'r un achos o'r claf yn Ynys Môn. Fel dwi'n deall, mae e'n dal i fyw yma yng Nghymru; dydy e ddim wedi symud. A'r rhesymau oedd rhesymau clinigol. Dyna pam roedd y penderfyniad wedi cael ei wneud. Nawr, mae'r sefyllfa wedi gwella, mae'r claf ei hun wedi gwella ac mae'n bosib i roi triniaeth iddo fe yma yng Nghymru.
English: The patient, as I understand it, and I'm relying on the most recent information I have, the patient himself remains being looked after in Wales, and the reason that it was considered that he might need to be cared for outside Wales was for clinical and safety reasons. But the individual's condition has improved to the point where it remains possible, as is of course preferable, that he should remain looked after here in Wales. That individual case does not give rise to the general conclusions that the Member tried to draw from it. The general case she makes is different and there's a proper debate to be had there about whether the current state of the regulations we have are sufficient to guarantee - . And let me say that I agree entirely with the final things that Siân Gwenllian said: that receiving a service through the language of your choice is not an optional extra in Wales. It is a fundamental part of you receiving the care that you need. Sometimes, there will be clinical reasons why care outside Wales is required for somebody and then an individual decision has to be made. But the general point that Siân Gwenllian made is one that I believe in and that Government believes in: that the ability to receive a service through the medium of English or Welsh, of your choice, is a choice for the patient to make and it should be honoured.
Welsh: Mae'r claf, fel yr wyf i'n ei deall hi, ac rwy'n dibynnu ar y wybodaeth ddiweddaraf sydd gen i, mae'r claf ei hun yn dal i dderbyn gofal yng Nghymru, ac roedd y rheswm yr ystyriwyd y gallai fod angen gofal arno y tu allan i Gymru am resymau clinigol a diogelwch. Ond mae cyflwr yr unigolyn wedi gwella i'r pwynt lle mae'n dal yn bosibl, fel sy'n ddymunol wrth gwrs, y dylai barhau i dderbyn gofal yma yng Nghymru. Nid yw'r achos unigol hwnnw yn arwain at y casgliadau cyffredinol y ceisiodd yr Aelod eu tynnu ohono. Mae'r ddadl gyffredinol y mae'n ei gwneud yn wahanol ac mae dadl briodol i'w chael yn hynny o beth ynghylch pa un a yw sefyllfa bresennol y rheoliadau sydd gennym ni yn ddigonol i sicrhau - . A gadewch i mi ddweud fy mod i'n cytuno'n llwyr â'r pethau olaf a ddywedodd Siân Gwenllian: nad dewis atodol yng Nghymru yw cael gwasanaeth drwy eich iaith o ddewis. Mae'n rhan sylfaenol ohonoch chi'n cael y gofal sydd ei angen arnoch. Weithiau, bydd rhesymau clinigol pam mae angen gofal y tu allan i Gymru ar gyfer rhywun ac yna mae'n rhaid gwneud penderfyniad unigol. Ond mae'r pwynt cyffredinol a wnaeth Siân Gwenllian yn un yr wyf i'n credu ynddo ac y mae'r Llywodraeth yn credu ynddo: bod y gallu i gael gwasanaeth trwy gyfrwng y Gymraeg neu'r Saesneg, o'ch dewis chi, yn ddewis i'r claf ei wneud a dylid ei anrhydeddu.
English: Llywydd, the number of nurses and midwives on the professional register in Wales grew by 500 between April and September last year - the strongest rate of growth of any of the four UK nations.
Welsh: Llywydd, bu cynnydd o 500 i nifer y nyrsys a bydwragedd ar y gofrestr broffesiynol yng Nghymru rhwng mis Ebrill a mis Medi y llynedd - y gyfradd dwf gryfaf o blith unrhyw un o bedair gwlad y DU.
English: Thank you for the reply, Minister, but recently, the Royal College of Nursing in Wales produced a report on the implementation of the Nurse Staffing Levels (Wales) Act, and the report states that the nursing workforce in Wales is facing a national crisis with a high number of vacancies and the prospect of significant losses of nurses to retirement over the next five to 10 years in Wales. The RCN also called on the Welsh Government to focus on improving nurse retention through ensuring safe nurse staffing levels, access to professional development and implementation of measures to support well-being, good rates of pay, flexible working hours and opportunities. First Minister, what action is your Government taking to develop a retention strategy to alleviate the crisis in nurse staffing levels in Wales, please?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb, Gweinidog, ond yn ddiweddar, lluniodd Coleg Nyrsio Brenhinol Cymru adroddiad ar weithrediad Deddf Lefelau Staff Nyrsio (Cymru), ac mae'r adroddiad yn dweud bod y gweithlu nyrsio yng Nghymru yn wynebu argyfwng cenedlaethol gyda nifer fawr o swyddi gwag a'r posibilrwydd o golledion sylweddol o nyrsys i ymddeoliad dros y pump i 10 mlynedd nesaf yng Nghymru. Galwodd y Coleg Nyrsio Brenhinol hefyd ar Lywodraeth Cymru i ganolbwyntio ar wella'r gallu i gadw nyrsys drwy sicrhau lefelau diogel o staff nyrsio, mynediad at ddatblygiad proffesiynol a gweithredu mesurau i gefnogi llesiant, cyfraddau tâl da, oriau gweithio hyblyg a chyfleoedd. Prif Weinidog, pa gamau mae eich Llywodraeth yn eu cymryd i ddatblygu strategaeth cadw staff i liniaru'r argyfwng o ran lefelau staff nyrsio yng Nghymru, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: Llywydd, it is because we understand the age profile of the nursing profession in Wales that we have increased the number of training places in Wales by 89 per cent since 2014, and when it comes to retention, Llywydd, we have retained nurse bursaries here in Wales, while his party abandoned them across our border and is having to reintroduce them again to make good their mistake. Now, the Royal College of Nursing, of course, has welcomed the announcement made just before Christmas by my colleague the health Minister that we will, in this Assembly term, extend the scope of the nurse staffing levels Act here in Wales from the acute medical and surgical adult wards, which is where it began, to inpatient paediatric wards before the end of this Assembly term, and the Minister has extended as well funding for the work that is going on for further extension of that Act to adult mental health inpatient wards, to health visiting and to district nursing. That's why having 500 more nurses and midwives in the Welsh NHS in a six-month period between April and September last year is so important. That's part of the reason why we are able to move ahead with extending the scope of that very important Act.
Welsh: Llywydd, oherwydd ein bod ni'n deall proffil oedran y proffesiwn nyrsio yng Nghymru yr ydym ni wedi cynyddu nifer y lleoedd hyfforddi yng Nghymru gan 89 y cant ers 2014, a phan ddaw'n fater o gadw staff, Llywydd, rydym ni wedi cadw bwrsariaethau nyrsys yma yng Nghymru, tra bod ei blaid ef wedi cefnu arnyn nhw ar draws ein ffin ac yn gorfod eu hailgyflwyno eto i wneud iawn am eu camgymeriad. Nawr, mae'r Coleg Nyrsio Brenhinol, wrth gwrs, wedi croesawu'r cyhoeddiad a wnaed ychydig cyn y Nadolig gan fy nghyd-Weinidog, y Gweinidog iechyd, y byddwn, yn y tymor Cynulliad hwn, yn ymestyn cwmpas y Ddeddf lefelau staff nyrsio yma yng Nghymru o'r wardiau meddygol a llawfeddygol acíwt i oedolion, sef lle y dechreuodd, i wardiau pediatrig cleifion mewnol cyn diwedd tymor y Cynulliad hwn, ac mae'r Gweinidog wedi ymestyn hefyd y cyllid ar gyfer y gwaith sy'n cael ei wneud i ymestyn y Ddeddf honno ymhellach i wardiau iechyd meddwl i oedolion sy'n gleifion mewnol, i ymwelwyr iechyd ac i nyrsio ardal. Dyna pam mae cael 500 yn rhagor o nyrsys a bydwragedd yn GIG Cymru mewn cyfnod o chwe mis rhwng mis Ebrill a mis Medi y llynedd mor bwysig. Mae hynny'n rhan o'r rheswm pam yr ydym ni'n gallu bwrw ymlaen ag ymestyn cwmpas y Ddeddf bwysig iawn honno.
English: Llywydd, repeated assurances have been sought from both the Prime Minister and the Treasury that his Government will distribute spending power across the United Kingdom in a way that allows an equivalent level and quality of public goods and services to be provided in each of the four nations.
Welsh: Llywydd, ceisiwyd sicrwydd dro ar ôl tro gan Brif Weinidog y DU a'r Trysorlys y bydd ei Lywodraeth yn dosbarthu grym gwario ar draws y Deyrnas Unedig mewn modd sy'n caniatáu i lefel ac ansawdd cyfatebol o nwyddau a gwasanaethau cyhoeddus gael eu darparu ym mhob un o'r pedair gwlad.
English: Thank you for that answer, First Minister. If the spending of this Assembly had been increased by the Conservative Government in line with growth of the economy since 2010, we would be £4 billion better off than we are now. Effectively, the Tory austerity programme has robbed this country and the people of Wales of £4 billion. First Minister - [ Interruption.] - First Minister, if we had been given that £4 billion that we should have been given, what difference might it have made to the lives of the people of Wales and the quality of our public services?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb yna, Prif Weinidog. Pe byddai'r Llywodraeth Geidwadol wedi cynyddu gwariant y Cynulliad hwn yn unol â thwf yr economi er 2010, byddem ni £4 biliwn yn well ein byd nag yr ydym ni nawr. I bob pwrpas, mae rhaglen cyni cyllidol y Torïaid wedi dwyn £4 biliwn oddi ar y wlad hon ac oddi ar pobl Cymru. Prif Weinidog - [ Torri ar draws.] - Prif Weinidog, pe byddem ni wedi cael y £4 biliwn hynny a ddylai fod wedi eu rhoi i ni, pa wahaniaeth y gallai fod wedi ei wneud i fywydau pobl Cymru ac ansawdd ein gwasanaethau cyhoeddus?
English: Llywydd, of course, had the spending available to the National Assembly still maintained the share that we had back in 2010, we would have had an enormous additional scope to invest in the public services that make a difference every day in the lives of people here in Wales. Had that Conservative Government been able to match the level of investment in public services managed by Mrs Thatcher and by John Major, we would have been over £6 billion better off by this point in the Assembly's history. That's the level that previous Conservative Governments believed - [ Interruption.] Well, I can understand why Conservative Members are shocked to learn that, during the period that they've been involved in the stewardship of public services, we have fallen so far behind what was achieved by their own predecessors. That investment would have made a difference, wouldn't it, in every aspect of the responsibilities that this Assembly discharges. It would have allowed us to have done even more to provide affordable housing for people in Wales. It would have made sure that the investment that we could make in education, in health, in social services, in our economy - . Think what we could have done here in Wales if we hadn't been robbed of that £4 billion by the flawed and failed policies of austerity that the party opposite is now turning its back on, and no doubt we will hear cheers from them as they stand on their heads to celebrate the latest turn of their policy wheel.
Welsh: Llywydd, wrth gwrs, pe byddai'r gwariant a oedd ar gael i'r Cynulliad Cenedlaethol wedi parhau fel y gyfran yr oedd gennym ni yn ôl yn 2010, byddai gennym ni gwmpas ychwanegol enfawr i fuddsoddi yn y gwasanaethau cyhoeddus sy'n gwneud gwahaniaeth bob dydd ym mywydau pobl yma yng Nghymru. Pe byddai'r Llywodraeth Geidwadol honno wedi gallu cyfateb lefel y buddsoddiad mewn gwasanaethau cyhoeddus a sicrhawyd gan Mrs Thatcher a chan John Major, byddem ni wedi bod dros £6 biliwn yn well ein byd erbyn yr adeg hon yn hanes y Cynulliad. Dyna'r lefel yr oedd Llywodraethau Ceidwadol blaenorol yn ei gredu - [ Torri ar draws.] Wel, gallaf ddeall pam mae Aelodau Ceidwadol yn synnu o glywed, yn ystod y cyfnod y maen nhw wedi bod yn gyfrifol am stiwardiaeth gwasanaethau cyhoeddus, ein bod ni wedi syrthio mor bell y tu ôl i'r hyn a gyflawnwyd gan eu rhagflaenwyr eu hunain. Byddai'r buddsoddiad hwnnw wedi gwneud gwahaniaeth, oni fyddai, ym mhob agwedd ar y cyfrifoldebau y mae'r Cynulliad hwn yn eu cyflawni. Byddai wedi caniatáu i ni wneud hyd yn oed mwy i ddarparu tai fforddiadwy i bobl yng Nghymru. Byddai wedi gwneud yn siŵr bod y buddsoddiad y gallem ni ei wneud mewn addysg, mewn iechyd, mewn gwasanaethau cymdeithasol, yn ein heconomi - . Meddyliwch beth y gallem ni fod wedi ei wneud yma yng Nghymru pe na byddai'r £4 biliwn hynny wedi cael eu dwyn oddi wrthym gan y polisïau diffygiol a methiannus o gyni cyllidol y mae'r blaid gyferbyn yn cefnu arnyn nhw erbyn hyn, ac mae'n siŵr y cawn ni glywed bloeddio ganddyn nhw wrth iddyn nhw sefyll ar eu pennau i ddathlu tro diweddaraf eu holwyn bolisi.
English: I thank the Member for that. Amongst our priorities will be the deployment of our record investment in the Welsh NHS - an extra £342 million set out in the draft budget published on 16 December to strengthen primary care, to build further on the highest number ever of doctors and nurses we have in Wales and to respond to the challenges of an older population.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am hynna. Un o'n blaenoriaethau fydd buddsoddi mwy nag erioed o'r blaen yn y GIG yng Nghymru - £342 miliwn ychwanegol wedi ei ddynodi yn y gyllideb ddrafft a gyhoeddwyd ar 16 Rhagfyr i gryfhau gofal sylfaenol, er mwyn adeiladu ymhellach ar y nifer mwyaf erioed o feddygon a nyrsys sydd gennym ni yng Nghymru ac i ymateb i heriau poblogaeth hŷn.
English: First Minister, yesterday, you confidently claimed at a press conference that plans for hospitals and health boards to cope with pressures for the winter period were holding up. You even highlighted that your Government had provided £30 million - very welcome - earlier than ever in the year to help health boards prepare for winter. However, I think within about half an hour of your press conference, my local health board, Hywel Dda, announced they'd experienced a level of escalation not seen before - we've been there before, haven't we, team - and that they would be canceling all inpatient operations across all of their hospitals in the interests of patient safety. This is shocking. This is the end of elective surgery in Hywel Dda at the moment. First Minister, it's blatantly clear that the spin you provided to the press was not based on fact, or that you yourself are fully abreast of the current situation in our hospitals here in Wales. First Minister, when will your Government accept that there's a need for strong leadership of the Welsh NHS because these winter pressures happen - guess what - every winter? And we've been through this before. Yet again, the people in my constituency are having to wait endlessly for knee operations, hip operations, all manner of elective surgeries. There never seems to be an end to it.
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, ddoe, fe wnaethoch chi honni'n ffyddiog mewn cynhadledd i'r wasg fod cynlluniau ar gyfer ysbytai a byrddau iechyd i ymdopi â phwysau dros gyfnod y gaeaf yn dal eu tir. Fe wnaethoch chi hyd yn oed dynnu sylw at y ffaith bod eich Llywodraeth wedi darparu £30 miliwn - y mae croeso mawr iddo - yn gynharach nag erioed yn y flwyddyn i helpu byrddau iechyd i baratoi ar gyfer y gaeaf. Fodd bynnag, rwy'n credu o fewn tua hanner awr i'ch cynhadledd i'r wasg, cyhoeddodd fy mwrdd iechyd lleol, Hywel Dda, eu bod wedi profi mwy o gynnydd mewn achosion na welwyd o'r blaen - rydym ni wedi bod yn y sefyllfa hon o'r blaen, onid ydym ni, dîm - ac y byddent yn canslo pob llawdriniaeth ar g leifion mewnol ymhob un o'u hysbytai er lles diogelwch cleifion. Mae hyn yn frawychus. Dyma ddiwedd ar lawdriniaethau dewisol ym mwrdd iechyd Hywel Dda ar hyn o bryd. Prif Weinidog, mae'n gwbl amlwg nad oedd y rhethreg a gyflwynoch chi i'r wasg wedi'i seilio ar ffeithiau, neu nad ydych chi eich hun yn gwbl ymwybodol o'r sefyllfa bresennol yn ein hysbytai yma yng Nghymru. Prif Weinidog, pryd y bydd eich Llywodraeth yn derbyn bod angen arweiniad cryf gan GIG Cymru oherwydd bod y pwysau hyn dros y gaeaf i'w gweld - coeliwch neu beidio - bob gaeaf? Ac rydym ni wedi bod yn y sefyllfa hon o'r blaen. Unwaith eto, mae'r bobl yn fy etholaeth yn gorfod aros yn ddiddiwedd am lawdriniaethau pen-glin, llawdriniaethau clun, pob math o lawdriniaethau dewisol. Ymddengys nad oes diwedd iddo.