English: I thank the Member for that range of questions. I'll deal with them as succinctly as I can. In relation to the question of common frameworks, work continues in relation to those. He will know from exchanges in committee that we've had in the past that we would like there to be faster progress in relation to that, but I think the distraction that we will have faced in planning for 'no deal' has had an impact, unfortunately, on the time frames. He will also know that those are intended to support policy development over the longer term, and what is obvious is that there may be a need to make policy adjustments in the interim period before a particular common framework has been agreed and been scrutinised and had stakeholder input and so on. So, we are currently looking at what we need to do in order to accommodate that need. In relation to the impact of the new Government on that work, I think that work has been under way at an official level and I think that work is progressing in relation to those. There have been, I think, two or three that have been with stakeholders for input. We're very conscious of the fact - I think all Governments are conscious of the fact that we need to make sure that there's time for legislatures and stakeholders to scrutinise those frameworks as they become more mature and before they are agreed. He talked about legislation and the legislative impact of prorogation. There are five Bills that have fallen as a consequence of prorogation. One at least was one that we'd provided formal consent for here, for that Bill; one would have extended our competence here in the Assembly; and one provided for important powers to enable payments to farmers and so on. So these are not small pieces of legislation of no relevance; they are important Bills that the Assembly here was expecting Parliament would have an opportunity to pass. We are looking at the moment at what that means in terms of possible additional legislation here. Certainly with regard to statutory instruments, there will be a need for further SIs to be brought forward, either because of things that we've learnt in the interim period or changes that have happened in European Union law in the interim period. So, those will be brought forward in due course. In relation to the economic impact, we know of course, as he outlined in his question, how significant the adverse economic impact of a 'no deal' or hard Brexit would be, and we also know that no form of Brexit will be as beneficial to the Welsh economy as membership of the European Union. The Government will be releasing an update on the economic impact of Brexit shortly. That will be available for Members to see. He talked about the shared prosperity fund. I'm afraid I'm not in a position to give him any update in relation to that. We simply do not know what the current plans are in Westminster in relation to that. The Minister for finance indicated earlier, I think, that she had begun to lose confidence that there even was a plan in the UK Government, and it's hard to resist that conclusion sometimes. With regard to the Prime Minister in Luxembourg, I think at the end of the day it's important to be available for scrutiny, isn't it? I think that just demonstrates a pattern of behaviour in not making oneself available for questioning and so on. But the broader point there: I was at the JMC (EN) last Thursday and asked for an update on the negotiations that the UK Government says it's undertaking, and I'm afraid I left with no confidence at all that we were looking at a negotiation as we would understand it - a substantive, advanced process of bargaining and exchange. So I'm not at all confident that I can give him any reassurance that there's a negotiation in the way that we would understand it, meaningfully, under way.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am yr ystod honno o gwestiynau. Byddaf yn ymdrin â nhw mor gryno ag y gallaf. O ran y cwestiwn ynghylch fframweithiau cyffredin, mae gwaith yn parhau o ran y rheini. Bydd yn gwybod o sgyrsiau yn y pwyllgor a gawsom ni yn y gorffennol yr hoffem ni weld cynnydd cyflymach yn gysylltiedig â hynny, ond credaf fod y gwrthdyniad yr ydym ni wedi'i wynebu wrth gynllunio ar gyfer sefyllfa o ymadael 'dim cytundeb' wedi cael effaith, yn anffodus, ar yr amserlenni. Bydd hefyd yn gwybod mai bwriad y rheini yw cefnogi datblygiad polisi yn fwy hirdymor, a'r hyn sy'n amlwg yw y gall fod angen gwneud addasiadau polisi yn y cyfnod interim cyn cytuno ar fframwaith cyffredin penodol a chael craffu arno a chael mewnbwn gan randdeiliaid ac yn y blaen. Felly, rydym ni'n edrych ar hyn o bryd ar yr hyn y mae angen inni ei wneud er mwyn darparu ar gyfer yr angen hwnnw. O ran effaith y Llywodraeth newydd ar y gwaith hwnnw, credaf y bu gwaith ar y gweill ar lefel swyddogol a chredaf fod gwaith yn mynd rhagddo yn gysylltiedig â'r rheini. Credaf y bu dau neu dri gyda rhanddeiliaid er mwyn cael eu sylwadau. Rydym ni'n ymwybodol iawn o'r ffaith - rwy'n credu bod pob Llywodraeth yn ymwybodol o'r ffaith bod angen i ni wneud yn siŵr bod amser i ddeddfwrfeydd a rhanddeiliaid graffu ar y fframweithiau hynny wrth iddyn nhw aeddfedu a chyn iddyn nhw gael eu cytuno. Soniodd am ddeddfwriaeth ac effaith y broses o ohirio'r Senedd. Mae pum Bil wedi diffygio oherwydd y gohirio. Un o leiaf oedd yn un yr oeddem ni wedi rhoi caniatâd ffurfiol iddo yn y fan yma, ar gyfer y Bil hwnnw; un a fyddai wedi ymestyn ein cymhwysedd yma yn y Cynulliad; ac un a fyddai wedi rhoi pwerau pwysig i alluogi taliadau i ffermwyr ac ati. Felly nid darnau bach o ddeddfwriaeth amherthnasol yw'r rhain; maen nhw'n Filiau pwysig y mae'r Cynulliad yma yn disgwyl y byddai'r Senedd yn cael cyfle i'w pasio. Rydym ni'n ystyried ar hyn o bryd beth mae hynny'n ei olygu o ran deddfwriaeth ychwanegol bosibl yn y fan yma. Yn sicr, o ran offerynnau statudol, bydd angen cyflwyno offerynnau statudol pellach, naill ai oherwydd y pethau yr ydym ni wedi'u dysgu yn y cyfamser neu newidiadau a fu yng nghyfraith yr Undeb Ewropeaidd yn y cyfamser. Felly, caiff y rheini eu cyflwyno maes o law. O ran yr effaith economaidd, gwyddom, wrth gwrs, fel yr amlinellodd yn ei gwestiwn, pa mor arwyddocaol fyddai effaith economaidd anffafriol ymadael 'dim cytundeb' neu Brexit caled, ac rydym ni hefyd yn gwybod na fydd unrhyw fath o Brexit mor fuddiol i economi Cymru ag aelodaeth o'r Undeb Ewropeaidd. Bydd y Llywodraeth yn rhyddhau'r wybodaeth ddiweddaraf am effaith economaidd Brexit yn fuan. Bydd honno ar gael i'r Aelodau ei gweld. Soniodd am y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin. Rwy'n ofni nad wyf mewn sefyllfa i roi unrhyw ddiweddariad iddo yn gysylltiedig â hynny. Yn syml iawn, nid ydym ni'n gwybod beth yw'r cynlluniau presennol yn San Steffan yn hynny o beth. Dywedodd y Gweinidog cyllid yn gynharach, rwy'n credu, ei bod wedi dechrau colli hyder bod cynllun gan Lywodraeth y DU hyd yn oed, ac mae'n anodd ymwrthod â'r casgliad hwnnw weithiau. O ran y Prif Weinidog yn Lwcsembwrg, rwy'n credu ar ddiwedd y dydd ei bod hi'n bwysig bod ar gael ar gyfer craffu, onid yw e'? Rwy'n credu bod hynny'n dangos patrwm o ymddygiad wrth beidio â bod ar gael i'ch holi ac yn y blaen. Ond y pwynt ehangach yn y fan honno: roeddwn i yng Nghyd-bwyllgor y Gweinidogion (Negodiadau'r Undeb Ewropeaidd) ddydd Iau diwethaf a gofynnais am ddiweddariad ar y trafodaethau y mae Llywodraeth y DU yn dweud eu bod yn eu cynnal, ac rwy'n ofni y gadewais heb unrhyw hyder o gwbl ein bod yn edrych ar negodi fel y byddem yn ei ddeall - proses drylwyr a manwl o fargeinio a chyfnewid. Felly nid wyf yn ffyddiog o gwbl y gallaf roi unrhyw sicrwydd iddo fod yna gyd-drafod yn y ffordd y byddem ni yn deall hynny, yn ystyrlon, yn mynd rhagddo.