English: Yes. I'm content to note, and there's a great deal of information that is important to us all in these letters. But specifically in terms of 3.4, I just wanted to note that I was very disappointed that there wasn't additional information in terms of what the specific targets were for the world cup. We have asked a number of times now for this information and we haven't received any specific information. So, it's going to be difficult to understand how the evaluation will take place without knowing what the targets were in the first instance. And that, perhaps, will be of assistance in the future, hopefully the next time that Wales takes part in the world cup, so we need to push that, I think. May I also note, in terms of 3.5, Chair, that I'm very pleased to see that response? I also, in terms of 3.9 and 3.10, noted the difference, perhaps, between the response we received from Cardiff Council to say that they hadn't received additional funding, but that there was public funding that had been allocated. So, I also echo your comment in terms of the tone of that letter. That's clearly an issue for Cardiff Council, but it is a nationally important asset too, as we've previously discussed, and I would hope that the tone, in terms of noting that we perhaps weren't being fair in terms of our comments, that it is important to note that this was a cross-party letter by us as a committee. And finally, if I may, I wanted to draw attention to letter 3.18. This is an issue that we haven't yet discussed in terms of the proposal to potentially close the Museum of Cardiff. I think this is something that will be a wider problem across Wales, because local museum services aren't on a statutory footing, and with the genuine challenges facing local government, this is perhaps something that we should keep an eye on, because we clearly have seen that this has been a very important resource for the local community, as it's won awards, it's received public funding, and it does important work. So, this is something, in terms of services that aren't on a statutory footing but are culturally important: what is the future for this kind of organisation and provision? Because the model that is proposed poses a risk that it might not then be a museum to all intents and purposes. What does that mean for the future of those collections and for engagement?
Welsh: Ie. Hapus i nodi, ond yn amlwg, mae yna lot fawr o wybodaeth sydd yn bwysig iawn inni yn y llythyrau hyn. Jest yn benodol efallai o ran 3.4, roeddwn i jest eisiau nodi fy mod i'n siomedig bod yna ddim mwy o wybodaeth o ran beth oedd y targedau penodol o ran cwpan y byd. Dŷn ni wedi gofyn nifer o weithiau rŵan a dŷn ni ddim wedi cael dim gwybodaeth bendant. Felly, mae'n mynd i fod yn anodd gwybod sut mae'r gwerthuso yn mynd i ddigwydd heb wybod beth oedd y nodau yn y lle cyntaf. A dwi'n meddwl bod hyn yn rhywbeth o ran y dyfodol, gobeithio y tro nesaf y bydd Cymru yng nghwpan y byd, y byddem ni wedyn yn gallu gwthio o ran hyn. Gaf i hefyd nodi, os gwelwch yn dda, Gadeirydd, o ran 3.5, fy mod i'n falch iawn o weld yr ymateb hwnnw? Mi oeddwn i hefyd, o ran yr ymateb 3.9 a 3.10, yn nodi y gwahaniaeth, efallai, rhwng yr ymateb cawsoch chi gan Gyngor Caerdydd o ran nodi eu bod nhw heb dderbyn unrhyw gyllid, ond bod yna gyllid cyhoeddus wedi bod. Felly, roeddwn i hefyd yn ategu'ch sylwadau o ran tôn y llythyr. Yn amlwg, mae hwn yn fater i Gyngor Caerdydd, ond mae o'n adnodd cenedlaethol o bwys, fel dŷn ni wedi trafod yn y gorffennol, a byddwn i'n gobeithio bod y tôn, o ran nodi ein bod ni efallai ddim yn bod yn deg iawn o ran ein sylwadau, ei bod hi'n bwysig nodi bod hwn yn lythyr trawsbleidiol gennym ni fel pwyllgor. Ac yn olaf, os caf i, mi oeddwn i eisiau jest tynnu sylw at lythyr 3.18. Mae hwn yn fater dŷn ni heb ei drafod eto ynglŷn â'r posibilrwydd o gau Amgueddfa Caerdydd. Dwi'n meddwl bod hwn yn rhywbeth efallai bydd yn broblem ehangach ledled Cymru gan fod gwasanaethau amgueddfeydd lleol ddim yn rhai statudol, ac efo'r heriau gwirioneddol sydd ar lywodraeth leol, fod hwn yn rhywbeth efallai inni gadw llygad arno fo, oherwydd dŷn ni'n amlwg wedi gweld bod hwn yn adnodd eithriadol o bwysig i'r gymuned leol, yn gwneud gwaith pwysig, wedi ennill gwobrau, wedi derbyn arian cyhoeddus. Felly, dwi'n meddwl bod hwn yn rhywbeth, o ran gwasanaethau sydd ddim yn statudol ond sy'n bwysig yn ddiwylliannol: beth ydy dyfodol y math yma o sefydliadau? Oherwydd mae'r model sy'n cael ei gynnig efo risg mai nid amgueddfa fydd hi wedyn. Beth ydy dyfodol y casgliadau hynny, a'r ymgysylltu?