English: I just wanted to add one or two comments to what's already been said by the Chair and other Members. Over the recess, I visited the site of the Grenfell Tower, and I think it remains a very devastating landmark to the disgrace that most of these residents have not yet been allocated a proper home, despite the fact that Kensington and Chelsea is one of the richest boroughs in Britain and they seem to be too busy making development deals with people who want to build million-pound homes. If the UK Government wasn't so busy with Brexit, they should have instructed Kensington and Chelsea to rehouse these people compulsorily. Anyway, I want to emphasise this lack of clarity about the front doors of flats because, as the Chair's already outlined, we've had lots of conflicting evidence, and absolute - . We know, anecdotally, from all of us having visited properties, that loads of people change their front doors and nobody has any oversight over whether they are fire-resistant, and, obviously, that puts other people, as well as themselves, at risk. So, that is something where it would be very useful if the Government could take prompt action on. I think there's also the point about the need to use the architect as the quality assurer, because the construction of buildings is such a complicated business these days, and unless you are on-site reasonably frequently, you simply have no idea whether the work is being done to the standards as specified in the contract. And once the first fix is completed, it is absolutely impossible to see whether a building is fire-safe or whether it's a fire hazard. And we had very good evidence from the fire service, who specifically spoke about a particular building where they'd had reason to have to pull apart what was behind the panels to find that it absolutely was a fire hazard. So, how many other high-rise buildings are in a similar state? We have to - . It is the role of Government to ensure that the regulations are adhered to and that people can reasonably assume that, if they are going to be living in a high-rise building, it is going to meet the regulations to enable them to escape in the event of a fire.
Welsh: Roeddwn am ychwanegu un neu ddau o sylwadau at yr hyn a ddywedwyd eisoes gan y Cadeirydd ac Aelodau eraill. Yn ystod y toriad, ymwelais â safle Tŵr Grenfell, ac rwy'n credu ei fod yn parhau i fod yn dirnod torcalonnus sy'n nodi'r ffaith waradwyddus nad yw'r rhan fwyaf o'r preswylwyr heb gael cartref iawn o hyd, er mai Kensington and Chelsea yw un o'r bwrdeistrefi cyfoethocaf ym Mhrydain ac mae'n ymddangos eu bod yn rhy brysur yn gwneud cytundebau datblygu gyda phobl sydd eisiau adeiladu cartrefi gwerth miliynau o bunnoedd. Pe na bai Llywodraeth y DU mor brysur gyda Brexit, dylai fod wedi cyfarwyddo Kensington and Chelsea drwy orfodaeth i ailgartrefu'r bobl hyn. Beth bynnag, rwyf am bwysleisio'r diffyg eglurder ynghylch drysau ffrynt fflatiau oherwydd, fel y mae'r Cadeirydd eisoes wedi amlinellu, rydym wedi cael llawer o dystiolaeth sy'n gwrthdaro, a - . Gwyddom, yn anecdotaidd, gan fod pob un ohonom wedi ymweld ag eiddo, fod llwythi o bobl yn newid eu drysau ffrynt ac nid oes neb yn goruchwylio i weld a ydynt yn gwrthsefyll tân, ac yn amlwg, mae hynny'n rhoi pobl eraill, yn ogystal â hwy eu hunain, mewn perygl. Felly, mae hynny'n rhywbeth y byddai'n ddefnyddiol iawn pe gallai'r Llywodraeth weithredu ar fyrder yn ei gylch. Rwy'n credu hefyd bod yna bwynt ynglŷn â'r angen i ddefnyddio'r pensaer fel aswiriwr ansawdd, oherwydd mae'r gwaith o adeiladu adeiladau'n fusnes mor gymhleth y dyddiau hyn, ac os nad ydych ar y safle'n weddol aml, ni fydd gennych unrhyw syniad a yw'r gwaith yn cael ei wneud i'r safonau a bennwyd yn y contract. A phan gwblheir y rhan gyntaf o'r gwaith, mae'n gwbl amhosibl gweld a yw adeilad yn ddiogel rhag tân neu a yw'n creu perygl tân. A chawsom dystiolaeth dda iawn gan y gwasanaeth tân, a siaradodd yn benodol am adeilad penodol lle'r oedd ganddynt reswm dros dynnu'r hyn a oedd y tu ôl i'r paneli oddi wrth ei gilydd a gwelsant ei fod yn bendant yn berygl tân. Felly, sawl adeilad uchel iawn arall sydd mewn cyflwr tebyg? Rhaid inni - . Rôl y Llywodraeth yw sicrhau y glynir at y rheoliadau ac y gall pobl ragdybio'n rhesymol, os ydynt yn mynd i fod yn byw mewn adeilad uchel iawn, ei fod yn mynd i fodloni'r rheoliadau i'w galluogi i ddianc mewn tân.