techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Important things first from Siân Gwenllian. Item 4, papers to note: radio in Wales, additional evidence from Ofcom Advisory Committee; additional evidence on news and current affairs quotas for BBC Radio Wales; a letter from the National Library for Wales: additional information. And Rhodri Glyn Thomas has offered that we hold a committee meeting there, so I'm sure that we can go to Aberystwyth sometime to have a meeting. I'm sure that many of us will be very pleased to go back to Aber always. And then correspondence from Cymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg. Does anybody have any comments on the correspondence rather than the fact that Gareth Bale has scored?
Welsh: Pethau pwysig yn gyntaf gan Siân Gwenllian. Eitem 4, papurau i'w nodi: radio yng Nghymru, tystiolaeth ychwanegol gan Bwyllgor Cynghori Ofcom; wedyn tystiolaeth ychwanegol am gwotâu newyddion a materion cyfoes BBC Radio Wales; ac wedyn llythyr gan Lyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru: gwybodaeth ychwanegol. Mae Rhodri Glyn Thomas wedi cynnig ein bod ni'n cynnal cyfarfod pwyllgor yno, felly, mae'n siŵr y gallwn ni fynd i Aberystwyth rhywbryd i gynnal cyfarfod. Rwy'n siŵr bod nifer ohonom ni'n falch i fynd yn ôl i Aber wastad. Ac wedyn gohebiaeth gan Gymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg. A oes unrhyw sylw gan Aelodau ar yr ohebiaeth, yn hytrach na'r ffaith bod Gareth Bale wedi sgorio?
English: Sorry, just in terms of paper 4.4, correspondence from Cymdeithas yr Iaith, we're going to discuss our forward work programme after Easter, so they've asked for us to do a piece of work on the devolution of broadcasting and we'll take that into consideration like any other idea as part of our forward work programme.
Welsh: Sori, jest parthed papur 4.4 gan Gymdeithas yr Iaith, rŷm ni'n mynd i drafod ein blaenraglen waith ar ôl y Pasg, felly maen nhw wedi gofyn i ni wneud darn o waith ar ddatganoli darlledu. Byddwn yn cymryd hynny i ystyriaeth fel unrhyw syniad arall fel rhan o'r flaenraglen waith honno.
English: Thank you very much, and thank you to the committee for the warm welcome, particularly so early in the morning. And thank you for agreeing to arrange the meeting at this early hour. This is Geth Williams. Geth is the head of constitutional affairs in the Wales Office in Westminster. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, a diolch yn fawr i'r pwyllgor am y croeso cynnes, yn enwedig mor gynnar yn y bore. A diolch i chi am gytuno i drefnu'r cyfarfod mor gynnar. Dyma Geth Williams. Geth yw pennaeth materion cyfansoddiadol yn Swyddfa Cymru yn San Steffan. Diolch.
English: Thank you, Chair. Would you agree, Secretary of State, that the simplest way of securing continuity is to leave things as they are, namely the powers in the devolved areas that we already have that have come down from Brussels to Cardiff since 1999? Shouldn't we just allow them to continue to come? We don't need the intercept of going from Brussels to London and then London deciding what should proceed to Cardiff. You've made the point that we need assurance, security and continuity that makes sense. Well, the sensible thing would be to carry on with the status quo and the system that has existed for over 18 years. Wouldn't you agree?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Gadeirydd. A fyddech chi'n cytuno, Ysgrifennydd Gwladol, taw'r ffordd symlaf o sicrhau parhad ydy i adael pethau fel y maen nhw? Hynny yw, y pwerau yn y meysydd datganoledig sydd gennym ni eisoes sydd wedi dod o Frwsel i Gaerdydd ers 1999, jest gadael iddyn nhw barhau i ddod. Nid oes angen yr intercept yma o fynd o Frwsel i Lundain gyda Llundain yn penderfynu beth sydd yn mynd ymlaen i Gaerdydd. Rydych chi wedi gwneud y pwynt bod angen bod yn sicr a bod yn siŵr ac angen parhad sy'n gwneud synnwyr. Wel, y peth synhwyrol ydy cario ymlaen efo'r system sydd gennym ni eisoes ac sydd wedi bodoli ers dros 18 mlynedd. Fyddech chi ddim yn cytuno?
English: Fundamentally, there is a perception out there that we will be losing powers under the agreement here; that is, powers that we have had here since 1999 are being diverted to London before possibly coming back here. That's the perception out there. So, we need to do something to quash that perception from your side, because we're always talking about wishing to respect referenda results; we did have a referendum that agreed, by a significant majority, in 2011, to augment the Senedd's powers and not to lose powers. But the perception out there is that we are losing powers under the withdrawal Bill. Wouldn't you agree?
Welsh: Yn y bôn, mae yna ganfyddiad allan yn fanna ein bod ni'n colli pwerau o dan y cytundeb yn fan hyn; hynny yw, pwerau rydym ni wedi cael yn fan hyn ers 1999, maen nhw wedi'u harallgyfeirio i Lundain cyn efallai dod yn ôl i fan hyn. Dyna'r canfyddiad sydd allan yn fanna. Wedyn, mae eisiau gwneud rhywbeth i osgoi'r canfyddiad yna o'ch ochr chi, achos rydym ni wastad yn sôn am fod eisiau parchu canlyniadau refferenda; cawsom ni refferendwm a oedd yn cytuno, yn fwyafrifol sylweddol, yn 2011, i gynyddu pwerau'r Senedd, nid i'w colli nhw. Beth sydd yn dod yn glir yn fan hyn ydy bod canfyddiad allan yn fanna ein bod ni yn colli pwerau o dan y Bil ymadael yna. Fuasech chi ddim yn cytuno?
English: At the moment, power sits with the European Commission. Those powers are to be returned to the UK and to Wales, and therefore the amendment proposed to clause 11 makes it appear that that power would come immediately to Cardiff Bay, and therefore we need a process in place to ensure that all parts of the UK can collaborate in order to bring about a settlement that works for all constituent parts of the UK, not that one part of the UK is trying to take advantage of another, because this is a time when there are many uncertainties. Therefore, we must provide as much assurance as possible in order to attract the investment and to generate the wealth that we all want to see. So, if we focus on the outputs, then that will bring about success, but the reality is that the amendment laid to clause 11 would suggest that the power is coming from the European Commission to Wales and that there is then a process in place to ensure that all parts of the UK collaborate.
Welsh: Ar hyn o bryd, mae yna rym yn eistedd gyda'r Comisiwn Ewropeaidd. Mae'r grym hynny'n dod nôl i'r Deyrnas Unedig ac i Gymru, ac felly mae'r gwelliant sydd wedi cael ei gynnig i clause 11 - mae'n ymddangos bod y grym yna'n dod yn syth i Fae Caerdydd, ac felly mae eisiau proses wedyn er mwyn i bob rhan o'r Deyrnas Unedig allu cydweithio i ddod â setliad sydd yn gweithio i bob rhan ac felly nid bod un rhan o'r Deyrnas Unedig yn ceisio manteisio ar ran arall, achos mae hwn yn amser pan mae llawer o bethau sydd ddim yn sicr. So, felly, mae'n rhaid ein bod ni'n rhoi cymaint o sicrwydd ag sydd yn bosib er mwyn inni ddenu'r buddsoddiad a chreu'r cyfoeth rydym ni i gyd eisiau eu gweld. So, felly, os ydym ni'n canolbwyntio ar beth ddaw allan o hwn, yn sicr mi wnawn ni lwyddo, ond y gwirionedd yw bod y gwelliant sydd yn mynd i lawr i clause 11 yn awgrymu bod y grym yn dod o'r Comisiwn Ewropeaidd i Gymru ac mae yna broses wedyn er mwyn cael gweld bod pob rhan o'r Deyrnas Unedig yn cydweithio.
English: I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this; we could interpret that as a loss of powers from this place, which is contrary to the outcome of the 2011 referendum. But I'll leave that there, due to our restricted timetable this morning. Can I just ask you how the United Kingdom will proceed if no agreement is reached and if the First Minister of Wales is unable to recommend that the Assembly gives legislative consent to the withdrawal Bill? What happens if we here vote unanimously, or at least by a majority, against your withdrawal Bill? What happens then?
Welsh: Bydd yn rhaid inni gytuno i anghytuno ar hyn, ond rydym ni'n gallu dehongli hynny fel colli pwerau o'r lle yma, sydd yn erbyn canlyniad refferendwm 2011. Anyway, gwnawn ni adael hynny yn nhermau'r amser cyfyngedig sydd gyda ni'r bore yma. A allaf i jest ofyn ichi sut bydd y Deyrnas Unedig yn symud ymlaen os na cheir cytundeb ac os na all Prif Weinidog Cymru argymell bod y Cynulliad yn rhoi cytuniad deddfwriaethol i'r Bil ymadael? Beth sy'n digwydd os ydym ni'n mynd i bleidleisio yn fan hyn yn unfrydol, neu o leiaf o fwyafrif, yn erbyn eich Bil ymadael chi? Beth sy'n digwydd wedi hynny?
English: Well, as I told the Chair earlier, I remain optimistic. Clearly, if we focus on the outcome and what's going to be best for the Welsh economy, the UK economy, then we will succeed. That is my approach, but, certainly, it's only through collaboration that we will reach agreement.
Welsh: Wel, fel y dywedais i wrth y Cadeirydd yn gynt, rydw i'n dal i fod yn optimistig. Yn amlwg, os ydym ni'n canolbwyntio ar beth ddaw allan yn y pen draw, beth sy'n mynd i fod y peth gorau i'r economi yng Nghymru, economi'r Deyrnas Unedig, mi wnawn ni lwyddo. Dyna'r modd yr wyf i'n gweithio, ond, yn sicr, dim ond trwy gydweithio y cawn ni gytundeb.
English: But if there is no agreement, what's plan B from your point of view?
Welsh: Ond os nad oes yna gytundeb, beth yw'r plan B o'ch ochr chi?
English: I am still focusing on gaining that agreement.
Welsh: Wel, rydw i'n dal i fod yn canolbwyntio ar gael cytundeb.
English: Fine, I'll leave it there.
Welsh: Reit. Gwnaf i ei adael e'n fanna.
English: Just on the back of that, part of the problem here is the confusion. In terms of issues which are devolved, such as the environment and agriculture and so on, within a European regime, the UK has been operating on an England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland model. But, of course, there is potential for confusion when it comes to any English government, because it's the UK Government carrying out those same functions. That's what causes concern to us here in Wales: that there is that confusion, which would mean that there is any excuse for the Westminster Government to make decisions in devolved areas, because fundamentally English devolution hasn't happened. So, we do need these assurances, because we know that we are losing powers here. Powers are being diverted, because it's the UK system that's running things rather than an England-only system.
Welsh: Jest ar gefn hwnnw, rhan o'r broblem fan hyn ydy'r dryswch. Efo materion sydd wedi'u datganoli, fel yr amgylchedd ac amaethyddiaeth ac ati, o fewn cyfundrefn Ewropeaidd, mae'r Deyrnas Unedig wedi bod yn gweithredu ar system Lloegr, Cymru, yr Alban, Gogledd Iwerddon. Ond, wrth gwrs, mae yna botensial am ddryswch pan mae'n dod i unrhyw lywodraeth Lloegr achos, wrth gwrs, Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig sy'n cyflawni'r un un gwaith yna. Dyna sydd yn peri gofid i ni yma yng Nghymru: bod yna ddryswch sydd yn golygu bod unrhyw esgus felly i Lywodraeth San Steffan wneud penderfyniadau mewn meysydd datganoledig, achos yn sylfaenol nid yw datganoli Lloegr wedi digwydd. So, mae angen sicrwydd, achos rydym yn gwybod ein bod ni'n colli pwerau yn y fan hyn. Rydym yn arallgyfeirio pwerau, achos cyfundrefn y Deyrnas Unedig sydd yn rhedeg pethau yn lle cyfundrefn Lloegr yn unig.
English: Well, may I say in the first place that I don't accept that we're losing powers, right? So, we'll park that, hopefully.
Welsh: Wel, a gaf i ddweud yn y lle cyntaf, nid wyf yn derbyn ein bod ni'n colli pwerau, reit? So, mi wnawn ni barcio hynny, gobeithio.
English: Well, we'll agree to disagree there.
Welsh: Wel, mi wnawn ni gytuno i anghytuno fanna.
English: Okay, but we'll park that. May I also say that discussions between Michael Gove and Lesley Griffiths, for example, are ongoing and in devolved areas the Sewel convention will always be implemented? That is always there and we haven't ever breached that. So, perhaps there is scepticism and a little cynicism being chucked back at us, but I can tell you that the Sewel convention has always been respected.
Welsh: Ocê, ond mi wnawn ni barcio hynny. A gaf i ddweud hefyd fod trafodaethau rhwng Michael Gove a Lesley Griffiths, er enghraifft, yn digwydd drwy'r amser, ac mewn ardaloedd datganoledig mi fydd confensiwn Sewel bob amser yn cael ei weithio? Mae hynny wastad yna ac nid ydym wedi torri hwnnw erioed. Felly, efallai bod yna scepticism a bach o cynicism yn cael ei daflu yn ôl tuag atom ni, ond gallaf i daflu yn ôl drwy'r amser fod confensiwn Sewel ar bob adeg wedi cael ei weithio iddo.
English: Well, thank you for that, but we've taken plenty of evidence when we've looked into how the various governments and governance works within the UK. We've received plenty of evidence in a previous inquiry that stated that the civil service in Westminster and in Whitehall fundamentally wasn't up to it; when it came to devolution vis-à-vis Wales, they were behind the curve. There were plenty of recommendations in terms of further training and so on for the civil service in London with regard to Wales. And that's why we are concerned, because we've seen various issues with the Wales Act with all its deficiencies. I know that we'll have to agree to disagree there too, but we've lost powers there as well. Minimum alcohol pricing - we've just had to rush Stage 1 through before 1 April, because we are losing those powers. You can't disagree with that. We have lost powers with the Wales Act partly because some departments in Whitehall don't understand the situation in terms of devolution in Wales. That's why we're concerned, because we do believe in this place that we are losing powers and that there is a deliberate attempt to confuse the issues, because devolution hasn't happened in England.
Welsh: Wel, diolch am hynny, ond rydym wedi cymryd digon o dystiolaeth pan roeddem yn edrych fewn i sut mae'r gwahanol lywodraethau a llywodraethiant yn gweithio o fewn y Deyrnas Unedig. Rydym wedi cael digon o dystiolaeth mewn adolygiad blaenorol a oedd yn dweud nad oedd y gwasanaeth sifil yn San Steffan ac yn Whitehall yn sylfaenol i fyny i'r gêm; pan mae'n dod i ddatganoli vis-à-vis Cymru, maent tu ôl y gêm. Mae yna ddigon o argymhellion ynglŷn ag angen rhagor o hyfforddiant ac ati i'r gwasanaeth sifil yn Llundain parthed Cymru. Wedyn, dyna pam rydym yn poeni ac yn pryderu, achos rydym wedi cael gwahanol bethau efo Deddf Cymru gyda'i holl ddiffygion. Rwy'n gwybod bydd rhaid i ni gytuno i anghytuno yn fanna hefyd, ond rydym wedi colli pwerau yn fanna hefyd. Minimum alcohol pricing - rydym newydd orfod rhuthro Stage 1 drwodd cyn 1 Ebrill, achos rydym yn colli'r pwerau. Ni fedrwch chi anghytuno efo hynny. Rydym wedi colli pwerau efo Deddf Cymru yn rhannol oherwydd nad yw rhai adrannau yn Whitehall yn deall y sefyllfa parthed datganoli yng Nghymru. Dyna pam rydym yn pryderu, achos rydym yn credu yn y fan hon i sicrwydd ein bod yn colli pwerau ac mae yna ymgais fwriadol i ddrysu pethau, achos nid yw datganoli wedi digwydd yn Lloegr o ran materion datganoledig.
English: Well, evidently, we have to disagree, but can I use the last Wales Bill - the Act? That has been a means of training, because that is new - completely new - across the whole of Westminster. So, we have introduced new regulations - devolution guidance note 18 - on how the departments throughout Whitehall should collaborate and work with the devolved institutions, particularly Wales, because that's a good example. A reset button has been pushed, because the level is much higher because a great deal more power has come to the Assembly. So, that now shows that the system of collaboration has to change. I am optimistic and positive about it throughout. But, once again, if we can go back to the debate that we're always having, if you want to revert to the time before the last Bill, well, clearly, I would suggest that you campaign on that outside and outwith. Well, good luck with doing that, but I don't see that happening.
Welsh: Wel, yn amlwg, mae'n rhaid ein bod ni'n anghytuno, ond a gaf i ddefnyddio'r Mesur Cymru diwethaf - y Ddeddf? Mae hwnnw wedi bod yn fodd o hyfforddiant, achos mae hwnnw'n newydd - yn gwbl newydd - ar draws San Steffan yn gyfan gwbl. Felly, rydym wedi cyflwyno rheolau newydd - devolution guidance note 18 - ar sut dylai adrannau ledled San Steffan gydweithio gyda sefydliadau datganoledig, yn enwedig ynglŷn â Chymru, achos mae honno'n esiampl dda. Mae reset button wedi bod, achos bod y lefel yn llawer uwch gan fod llawer mwy o rym wedi dod i'r Cynulliad. Felly, mae hynny nawr yn dangos bod yn rhaid i'r system o gydweithio newid. Rydw i'n optimistic a phositif am y peth drwy'r amser. Ond, eto i gyd, os gallwn ni fynd yn ôl i'r ddadl rydym wastad yn ei chael, os ydych eisiau mynd yn ôl i fel oedd hi, cyn y Mesur diwethaf, wel, yn amlwg, byddwn i'n awgrymu eich bod yn ymgyrchu ar hynny y tu allan. Wel, lwc dda ichi i gael llwyddiant, ond nid wyf yn gweld y byddai'n dod.
English: Well, we have campaigned -
Welsh: Wel, rydym wedi ymgyrchu -
English: And the first item on our agenda this afternoon is questions to the First Minister, and the first question is from Lynne Neagle.
Welsh: Yr eitem gyntaf ar ein hagenda ni y prynhawn yma yw cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog, a'r cwestiwn cyntaf, Lynne Neagle.
English: Yes. We are committed to a whole-Government approach to tackling child poverty and we are taking action to ensure that every child has the best start in life, and our child poverty strategy sets out our objectives and policy.
Welsh: Gwnaf. Rydym ni wedi ymrwymo i ddull Llywodraeth gyfan o fynd i'r afael â thlodi plant ac rydym ni'n cymryd camau i sicrhau bod pob plentyn yn cael y dechrau gorau mewn bywyd, ac mae ein strategaeth tlodi plant yn nodi ein hamcanion a'n polisi.
English: A new Equality and Human Rights Commission Wales report estimates that there could be 50,000 more Welsh children living in poverty by 2021 because of the Tory Government's welfare reforms. Given the challenges we face in tackling child poverty and the huge concern that has been expressed over the decision to end the school uniform grant in Wales, will the Welsh Government look again at this, and will the Welsh Government also take urgent action to ensure that its 2011 guidance, designed to ensure that school uniforms are affordable for families, is strengthened and properly implemented across Wales?
Welsh: Mae adroddiad newydd gan Gomisiwn Cydraddoldeb a Hawliau Dynol Cymru yn amcangyfrif y gallai fod 50,000 yn fwy o blant yng Nghymru yn byw mewn tlodi erbyn 2021 oherwydd diwygiadau lles y Llywodraeth Dorïaidd. O ystyried yr heriau yr ydym yn eu hwynebu o ran mynd i'r afael â thlodi plant a'r pryder mawr a fynegwyd ynghylch y penderfyniad i roi terfyn ar y grant gwisg ysgol yng Nghymru, a wnaiff Llywodraeth Cymru ystyried hyn eto, ac a wnaiff Llywodraeth Cymru gymryd camau brys hefyd i sicrhau bod ei chanllawiau o 2011, y bwriadwyd iddynt sicrhau bod gwisgoedd ysgol yn fforddiadwy i deuluoedd, yn cael eu cryfhau a'u gweithredu'n briodol ledled Cymru?
English: Can I give the Member the assurance that in the next academic year there will be a scheme in place that is broader than the current school uniform grant? That will be of huge assistance to many, many parents and many, many children, and it's intended that the process of moving on to that new system will be seamless.
Welsh: A gaf i roi'r sicrwydd i'r Aelod y bydd cynllun ar waith yn y flwyddyn academaidd nesaf sy'n ehangach na'r grant gwisg ysgol presennol? Bydd hwnnw o gymorth enfawr i lawer iawn o rieni a llawer iawn o blant, a bwriedir i'r broses o symud ymlaen i'r system newydd honno fod yn ddi-dor.
English: First Minister, do you at least welcome the 100,000 reduction in the number of Welsh children living in absolute poverty since 2010, and do you accept that the benefit cap has impacted most in London, which had 90 per cent of housing benefit claims above £20,000 rather than in Wales, and will you credit the near doubling of the tax-free allowance since 2010 for its role in helping many less well-off families?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, a ydych chi o leiaf yn croesawu'r gostyngiad o 100,000 i nifer y plant yng Nghymru sy'n byw mewn tlodi absoliwt ers 2010, ac a ydych chi'n derbyn bod y cap ar fudd-daliadau wedi cael yr effaith fwyaf yn Llundain, a oedd â 90 y cant o hawliadau budd-dal tai yn uwch nag £20,000 yn hytrach nag yng Nghymru, ac a wnewch chi roi clod am bron i ddyblu'r lwfans di-dreth ers 2010 am ei swyddogaeth yn y broses o helpu llawer o deuluoedd llai cefnog?
English: Let me tell you that I deplore the enormous cuts in public funding that we've seen since 2010 from the Conservative Government, the bun g that was given to Northern Ireland of £1 billion for health and education, whereas Wales got absolutely nothing, the fact that so many children have suffered as a result of impositions such as the bedroom tax, such as the incomes of their families, their parents' incomes, not going up, not being supported. Nobody in this Chamber can seriously believe that the Tories care about child poverty or that the last eight years has seen an improvement in poverty levels in Wales.
Welsh: Gadewch i mi ddweud fy mod i'n gresynu'r toriadau enfawr i gyllid cyhoeddus yr ydym ni wedi eu gweld ers 2010 gan y Llywodraeth Geidwadol, y cil-dwrn a roddwyd i Ogledd Iwerddon o £1 biliwn ar gyfer iechyd ac addysg, er na chafodd Cymru ddim byd o gwbl, y ffaith fod cynifer o blant wedi dioddef o ganlyniad i feichiau fel y dreth ystafell wely, fel incwm eu teuluoedd, incwm eu rhieni, ddim yn mynd i fyny, ddim yn cael eu cefnogi. Ni all neb yn y Siambr hon gredu o ddifrif bod y Torïaid yn poeni am dlodi plant, na bod gwelliant wedi bod i lefelau tlodi yng Nghymru dros yr wyth mlynedd diwethaf.
English: I'm outraged by those figures that were relayed earlier on, and many of those contributory factors are outwith your control. But the school uniform grant is something that is within your control. Now, while the Assembly was in recess, and at the same time as your flagship anti-poverty programme, the Communities First programme was wound up, we heard that you intend to cut the school uniform grant to a tune of £700,000, which is a small amount of money in the scheme of things. It is a grant that helps some of the poorest families access education. While you're prepared to cut this amount of money, it looks petty, First Minister. What assessment have you made regarding the issue of child poverty and the impact of this change on child poverty, and will you agree to write to school heads to ask them to allow pupils to wear non-logoed uniform items in order to try and mitigate some of the impact of this cut to the school uniform grant?
Welsh: Mae'r ffigurau hynny a gyhoeddwyd yn gynharach wedi fy ngwylltio'n gacwn, ac mae llawer o'r ffactorau cyfrannol hynny y tu allan i'ch rheolaeth. Ond mae'r grant gwisg ysgol yn rhywbeth sydd o fewn eich rheolaeth. Nawr, tra'r oedd y Cynulliad ar doriad, ac ar yr un pryd ag y cafodd eich rhaglen wrthdlodi flaenllaw, y rhaglen Cymunedau yn Gyntaf ei dirwyn i ben, clywsom eich bod yn bwriadu torri'r grant gwisg ysgol gan £700,000, sy'n swm cymharol fach o arian yn y cyd-destun. Mae'n grant sy'n helpu rhai o'r teuluoedd tlotaf i gael mynediad at addysg. Er eich bod yn barod i dorri'r swm hwn o arian, mae'n edrych yn bitw, Prif Weinidog. Pa asesiad ydych chi wedi ei wneud ynglŷn â'r mater o dlodi plant ac effaith y newid hwn ar dlodi plant, ac a wnewch chi gytuno i ysgrifennu at benaethiaid ysgolion i ofyn iddyn nhw ganiatáu i ddisgyblion wisgo eitemau gwisg ysgol heb logo er mwyn ceisio lliniaru rhywfaint o effaith y toriad hwn i'r grant gwisg ysgol?