techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I have now decided that now is voting time, and therefore unless three Members wish to have the bell rung, we will proceed to the first vote. So, we're voting on the debate on Brexit, and I call for a vote on amendment 1, tabled in the name of Darren Millar. Open the vote. Close the vote. For the motion 10, five abstentions, 38 against. Therefore, amendment 1 is not agreed.
Welsh: Rwyf i nawr wedi penderfynu mai nawr yw'r amser pleidleisio, ac felly oni bai fod tri aelod yn dymuno i'r gloch gael ei chanu, awn ni ymlaen at y bleidlais gyntaf. Felly, rydym ni'n pleidleisio ar y ddadl ar Brexit, ac rwy'n galw am bleidlais ar welliant 1, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Darren Millar. Agorwch y bleidlais. Caewch y bleidlais. O blaid y cynnig 10, pump yn ymatal, 38 yn erbyn. Felly, ni dderbyniwyd gwelliant 1.
English: And I now call for a vote on amendment 2, tabled in the name of Neil McEvoy. Open the vote. Close the vote. For the amendment 8, one abstention, 43 against. Therefore, amendment 2 is not agreed.
Welsh: A galwaf yn awr am bleidlais ar welliant 2, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Neil McEvoy. Agorwch y bleidlais. Caewch y bleidlais. Ar gyfer gwelliant 8, un yn ymatal, 43 yn erbyn. Felly, ni dderbyniwyd gwelliant 2.
English: We now call for a vote on the motion, tabled in the name of Rebecca Evans. Open the vote. Close the vote. For the motion 37, no abstentions, 16 against. Therefore, the motion is agreed.
Welsh: Galwn yn awr am bleidlais ar y cynnig, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Rebecca Evans. Agorwch y bleidlais. Caewch y bleidlais. O blaid y cynnig 37, neb yn ymatal, 16 yn erbyn. Felly, mae'r cynnig wedi'i dderbyn.
English: I just want to ask about the taxi sector. Do you believe that there's a way to influence those who work in that particular sector to change to electric cars, and how would that be done? I was in a taxi this morning in Cardiff and there is a target from Cardiff council, as I understand it, that they need to change to electric cars by 2025. So that's not very far along the line, really, is it? What do you think will enable every council to achieve the same thing?
Welsh: Dwi jest eisiau gofyn ynglŷn â'r sector tacsis. Ydych chi'n credu bod yna ffordd i ddylanwadu'r rheini sy'n gweithio yn y sector honno i newid i geir trydanol, a sut mae gwneud hynny? Roeddwn i mewn tacsi y bore yma yng Nghaerdydd, ac mae yna darged gan gyngor Caerdydd, dwi ar ddeall, eu bod nhw angen newid i geir electrig erbyn 2025. Dyw hwnna ddim yn hir lawr y lein. Felly, beth ydych chi'n credu sy'n mynd i ganiatáu i bob cyngor allu gwneud yr un fath o beth?
English: Just quickly on that, to respond to that point, did London provide assistance to fund that fleet, or was it up to the companies or the individuals to pay for everything with regard to that?
Welsh: Jest yn glou, i ymateb, oedd Llundain wedi rhoi help i ariannu'r fleet yna, neu oedd e ar y cwmnïau neu'r unigolion i dalu am bopeth ynghlwm â hynny?
English: Thank you. Just briefly, I think Andy touched on this earlier, with regard to you saying in your evidence, the LCVP's evidence, that hybrid vehicles should be used, and that's the swiftest way to make these adaptations, but I think Chaitanya and the Green Alliance say that we should focus on purely electric vehicles. So, is there a conflict here, or is it just a more pragmatic way of looking at this? What is your opinion and how do you account for the difference?
Welsh: Ocê. Diolch. Jest yn glou, dwi'n credu bod Andy wedi cyffwrdd arno fe, eich bod chi wedi dweud yn eich tystiolaeth bod gallu defnyddio cerbydau trydan hybrid yn mynd i fod yn ffordd fwy cyflym i allu gwneud yr addasiadau, ond dwi'n credu bod Chaitanya a'r Green Alliance yn dweud bod angen canolbwyntio ar drydaneiddio pur. Felly, a oes yna wrthdaro fan hyn, neu a yw e jest yn ffordd fwy pragmatig o'i weld? Beth yw'ch barn chi sydd yn wahanol ar hyn?
English: And the final question from me, which is an important question, I think. You're probably aware that the Welsh Government had included in its White Paper on issues relating to transport the idea of reforming taxi licensing, and so on. Andy, you've talked about the licences, and how that can be more of an incentive to change, but they've taken that out of the White Paper now, and people in the taxi industry are - I don't know what the word is - cross about it, because they did want to see reform, but perhaps not the same reforms as you'd want to see. But, do you think that because there is going to be a period where are no reforms coming forward, that that will impact on the capacity and their ability within the industry to change as swiftly as you would want?
Welsh: A'r cwestiwn olaf gen i, a dwi'n credu ei fod yn gwestiwn pwysig. Rydych chi siŵr o fod yn ymwybodol bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi cynnwys o fewn y Papur Gwyn ynglŷn â thrafnidiaeth y cysyniad o ddiwygio'r system tacsis a'r trwyddedau, ac yn y blaen. Rydych chi, Andy, wedi siarad am y trwyddedau, a sut mae hynny'n gallu bod yn fwy o incentive i newid, ond maen nhw wedi tynnu hynny mas o'r Papur Gwyn, ac yn sicr mae yna bobl yn y maes tacsis yn eithaf - dwi ddim yn gwybod beth yw'r gair - dig am y peth, achos roedden nhw eisiau gweld diwygiadau, ond efallai nid yr un diwygiadau rydych chi eisiau'u gweld. Ond ydych chi'n meddwl, oherwydd bod yna yn mynd i fod cyfnod lle nad oes yna ddiwygiadau, fod hynny'n mynd i effeithio ar eu capasiti a'u gallu nhw i newid mor glou ag y byddech chi eisiau?
English: Okay. Good morning, all, and welcome to this meeting of the Finance Committee. May I note, as usual, that headphones are available for translation or sound amplification? May I remind Members - including myself - to ensure that any electronic devices are on silent? And may I ask if any Members have any interests to declare?
Welsh: Iawn. Wel, bore da i chi i gyd. Croeso i gyfarfod y Pwyllgor Cyllid. Gaf i nodi wrth gwrs, fel arfer, fod clustffonau ar gael ar gyfer cyfieithu ar y pryd, neu ar gyfer addasu lefel y sain? Gaf i atgoffa Aelodau - gan gynnwys fi fy hun - i ddiffodd y sain ar unrhyw ddyfeisiadau electronig? A gaf i ofyn a oes gan unrhyw Aelod unrhyw fuddiannau i'w datgan?
English: You will see that we have two papers to note, two sets of minutes - from the meeting held on 3 October, and the meeting held on 9 October. Are you content to note those? Thank you very much.
Welsh: Mi welwch chi bod gennym ni ddau bapur i'w nodi, sef dau set o gofnodion - y cyfarfod a gynhaliwyd ar 3 Hydref, a'r cyfarfod ar 9 Hydref. Ydych chi'n hapus i nodi'r rheini? Diolch yn fawr iawn. Dyna ni.
English: So, we'll go on therefore to the main item on the agenda this morning, which of course is the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales estimates 2020-21 scrutiny. And it's my pleasure to welcome Nick Bennett, the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales, as well as Katrin Shaw, who is a chief legal adviser and director of investigations, and David Meaden, who is a financial accountant in the ombudsman's office. Welcome to you all. Would you like to say something about the paper, or are you happy to go straight to questions?
Welsh: Wel, awn ni ymlaen felly at y brif eitem gyntaf ar ein hagenda ni y bore yma, sef wrth gwrs craffu amcangyfrifon 2020-21 gan Ombwdsmon Gwasanaethau Cyhoeddus Cymru. Ac mae'n bleser gen i groesawu Nick Bennett, yr ombwdsmon, atom ni, ynghyd â Katrin Shaw, sy'n brif gynghorydd cyfreithiol a chyfarwyddwr ymchwiliadau, a David Meaden, sy'n gyfrifydd ariannol yn swyddfa'r ombwdsmon. Croeso i chi i gyd. Ydych chi eisiau dweud rhywbeth am y papur, neu ydych chi'n hapus i ni fynd yn syth i gwestiynau?
English: Happy to go straight to questions.
Welsh: Hapus i fynd yn syth i gwestiynau.
English: Straight to questions. So, I'll start, therefore, if that's okay. Just to ask in the first place, you'll be aware that we as a committee have a statement of principles for bodies that receive direct funding, and just to ask you perhaps to tell us how you followed that statement in developing your estimate for the next year.
Welsh: Syth i gwestiynau - dyna fe. Wel, mi wnaf i gychwyn felly, os ydy hynny'n iawn. Jest i ofyn efallai yn y lle cyntaf, byddwch chi'n ymwybodol ein bod ni fel pwyllgor wedi creu datganiad o egwyddorion ar gyfer y cyrff sy'n derbyn arian uniongyrchol, a jest i ofyn i chi efallai ddweud ychydig ynglŷn â sut dŷch chi wedi dilyn y datganiad hwnnw wrth ddatblygu eich amcangyfrif ar gyfer y flwyddyn nesaf.
English: Okay. Thank you, Chair. I hope that this document - this estimate - does reflect very well, and shows, that we have listened and have understood the principles. We have found savings. We're trying to be more efficient and we've assessed our processes. We haven't paid any attention to the financial review that has come from Westminster. I am aware that that talks about an additional £600 million, an increase in the block of 4 per cent before inflation, for next year. All we've done is followed the principles. Also, we've worked from the roots upwards, if you like, to see what the business needs, particularly now with the new powers that we've had. And of course, we're very grateful that those powers have been given to us. That's why we're asking for 1 per cent less after inflation. But, of course, that is after we estimate what the baseline is. Because, of course, we've had additional funding during the year in order to pay for the part of the year where we had those additional powers.
Welsh: Ocê. Diolch, Cadeirydd. Dwi'n gobeithio bod y ddogfen yma - yr amcangyfrif yma - yn adlewyrchu'n dda iawn, ac yn dangos, ein bod ni wedi gwrando, wedi deall, yr egwyddorion. Rydyn ni wedi ffeindio arbedion. Rydyn ni'n trio bod yn fwy effeithiol ac wedi asesu ein prosesau ni. Dydyn ni ddim wedi talu sylw at yr adolygiad ariannol sydd wedi dod o San Steffan. Dwi'n ymwybodol bod hwnnw'n sôn am efallai £600 miliwn ychwanegol, codiad yn y bloc o 4 y cant cyn cyfrif chwyddiant, yn ystod y flwyddyn nesaf. Y cwbl dwi'n gwneud ydy dilyn yr egwyddorion. Hefyd, rydyn ni wedi gweithio o'r gwreiddiau i fyny, os liciwch chi, i rili weld beth mae'r busnes ei angen, yn enwedig rŵan efo'r pwerau newydd rydyn ni wedi'u cael. Ac wrth gwrs, rydyn ni'n ddiolchgar iawn bod y pwerau yna wedi digwydd. Felly, dyna pam rydyn ni yn gofyn am 1 y cant yn llai ar ôl chwyddiant. Ond, wrth gwrs, mae hynny ar ôl i ni amcangyfrif beth yw'r baseline, os liciwch chi. Achos, wrth gwrs, rydyn ni wedi cael arian ychwanegol yn ystod y flwyddyn i dalu am y rhan o'r flwyddyn pan yr oedden ni'n cael y pwerau ychwanegol.
English: Okay, thank you. Talking about that, what you've done, from what I can see, is that you have restated the costs of the Act for a whole year in the current year, to compare, I would say, with the next year. Can you give us the rationale as to why you think that's the best way of doing it?
Welsh: Ocê, diolch. Sôn am hynny, wrth gwrs, beth dŷch chi wedi gwneud, o beth dwi'n gweld, ydy dŷch chi wedi ailddatgan costau y Ddeddf ar gyfer blwyddyn gyfan yn y flwyddyn bresennol, am wn i er mwyn cymharu â'r flwyddyn nesaf. Allwch chi jest roi ychydig o resymeg i ni pam ŷch chi'n meddwl mai dyna'r ffordd orau i wneud hynny?
English: Well, I'll try, but I'll turn to Dave if you want a more robust response. The clear principle was that we had additional funding during the current year, and I think that was for eight months of the year. So, what we've done is tried to take two thirds and come up with a figure for the entire year. Of course, there are some costs in the first year, in terms of pensions and other elements, that are not appropriate for an estimate for the next year. But, broadly speaking, that's how we've proceeded. I don't know whether Dave wants to add to that.
Welsh: Fe wnaf i drio, ond dwi'n mynd i droi at Dave, os ydych chi eisiau ateb mwy cadarn. Dwi'n meddwl yr egwyddor clir oedd inni gael arian ychwanegol yn ystod y flwyddyn bresennol, a dwi'n meddwl roedd hynny ar gyfer wyth mis o'r flwyddyn. Felly, beth rydyn ni wedi gwneud yw cymryd dau draean a dod i fyny efo ffigwr ar gyfer y flwyddyn gyfan. Wrth gwrs, mae yna rai costau yn ystod y flwyddyn gyntaf yna - pensiynau ac elfennau eraill - sydd ddim yn addas ar gyfer amcangyfrif ar gyfer y flwyddyn nesaf. Ond, yn fras, dyna'r ffordd rydyn ni wedi mynd o'i chwmpas hi. Dwi ddim yn gwybod os yw Dave eisiau ychwanegu rhywbeth i hynny.
English: Thank you. I'm interested in - . I wasn't a member of the committee this time last year, so I wasn't part of the scrutiny that happened at that time on the budget, but it looks to me, in looking at the notes that I have and looking at minutes, that there was some sort of tussle between you and the committee on the budget. I was interested to know what sort of impact that has had on you now when you're presenting the budget this time.
Welsh: Diolch i chi. Mae gen i ddiddordeb mewn - . Doeddwn i ddim yn aelod o'r pwyllgor amser hyn llynedd, so doeddwn i ddim yn rhan o'r craffu ddigwyddodd bryd hynny ar y gyllideb, ond mae'n edrych i fi, o edrych ar y nodiadau sydd gen i ac edrych ar y cofnodion, roedd e'n tipyn bach o tussle rhyngoch chi a'r pwyllgor ar y gyllideb. Roedd gen i ddiddordeb mewn pa fath o impact mae hynny wedi'i gael arnoch chi nawr pan dŷch chi'n cyflwyno'r gyllideb y tro yma.
English: I accept that, and I think that some tension is important so that we actually get to where we want to. However, for us to ensure the accountability that we require, there is also a need for some consistency from you in the way that you present the budget, so that we can look back and then understand that the transparency within the budget is there. How have you been trying to ensure that that consistency is there and is something that we can understand?
Welsh: Dwi'n derbyn hynny, a dwi'n credu bod rhywfaint o dyndra yn eithaf pwysig fel ein bod ni actually yn dod at ble dŷn ni eisiau bod. Ond er mwyn i ni sicrhau yr atebolrwydd sydd ei angen arnom ni, mae hefyd angen rhywfaint o gysondeb gennych chi yn y ffordd rydych chi'n cyflwyno'r gyllideb, fel ein bod ni'n gallu edrych nôl ac wedyn deall y tryloywder sydd tu fewn i'r gyllideb. Sut ydych chi wedi bod yn trio sicrhau bod y cysondeb yna yn rhywbeth dŷn ni'n gallu deall?
English: I think that it is more of a challenge this year because of these new powers, there is an additional team to ensure improvement of the new functions when it comes to own-initiative powers, and also in the authorities for dealing with complaints. But I think the basic aspects haven't changed, and it's possible for us to be open and to ensure that the transparency is there for you. I do hope that things haven't changed that much during the last year. I am very pleased with the new powers, but we do understand that the fundamental purpose of the office hasn't changed in terms of dealing with complaints by individuals. I do hope that how we try to be open with the figures is acceptable.
Welsh: Dwi'n meddwl bod o'n fwy o her eleni oherwydd y pwerau newydd yma, mae yna dîm ychwanegol ar gyfer sicrhau gwelliant y pwerau a'r functions newydd pan mae'n dod i bwerau liwt fy hun, ac hefyd yn yr awdurdodau ar gyfer delio â chwynion. Ond dwi'n meddwl bod y pethau sylfaenol ddim wedi newid, a'i fod o'n bosibl i ni fod yn agored iawn a sicrhau bod y tryloywder yna i chi. A dwi'n gobeithio bod pethau ddim wedi newid gymaint â hynny yn ystod y flwyddyn ddiwethaf. Dwi yn blês iawn efo'r pwerau newydd, ond rydym ni yn deall hefyd fod pwrpas sylfaenol y swyddfa ddim wedi newid pan mae'n dod i ddelio â chwynion unigolion. Dwi'n gobeithio bod y ffordd rydym ni'n trio bod yn agored efo'r ffigurau yna yn dderbyniol.
English: Thank you. Good morning. The first supplementary budget for 2019-20 included funding for the transitional costs associated with the Act - some £27,000, I believe, was noted as costs for one year. Is the transitional funding going to be spent in full this year? Do you have any comments to make on how correct the estimates were, in terms of how much was needed during the transition period?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Bore da. Mi oedd cyllideb atodol gyntaf 2019-20 yn cynnwys arian ar gyfer costau trosiannol yn gysylltiedig â'r Ddeddf - rhyw £27,000, dwi'n meddwl, oedd yn cael ei nodi fel costau un flwyddyn. Ydy'r arian trosiannol yn mynd i gael ei wario yn llawn eleni? Oes gennych chi sylwadau i'w gwneud ar ba mor gywir oedd yr amcangyfrifon o faint fyddai ei angen ar gyfer y cyfnod trosiannol?
English: I think we've spent all of the funding, and I think there was nothing wrong with that at all. Dave, would you agree with that?
Welsh: Dwi'n meddwl ein bod ni wedi gwario yr arian i gyd, ac nid oedd dim byd o'i le o gwbl. Dave, ydych chi'n cytuno?
English: Thank you very much. As well as additional funding that would go out as a result of the new Act, you had hoped that you would start to see money coming in from the element of cost avoidance that was coming in, as set out in the new Act, and that would start quite low - about £30,000 or £40,000 - but would rise quite substantially by the fifth year. How are those costs - those savings - reflected in what we're seeing in the estimate?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Yn ogystal ag arian ychwanegol a fyddai'n mynd allan oherwydd y Ddeddf newydd, mi oeddech chi'n gobeithio y byddech chi'n gweld arian yn dechrau dod i mewn o'r costau, neu o'r elfen o osgoi costau oedd yn dod i mewn o dan y Ddeddf newydd, gan ddechrau'n eithaf isel - rhyw £30,000 i £40,000 - ond yn codi'n sylweddol erbyn y bumed flwyddyn. Sut mae'r costau hynny - yr arbedion hynny - yn cael eu hadlewyrchu yn beth rydyn ni'n ei weld yn yr amcangyfrif?
English: Not at all. I don't think that we will be ready to do that for at least another year. As I told Alun earlier, we have set the criteria for the two main powers - own-initiative powers and the complaints standards authority. I hope that those powers will start in January. It's very difficult for me to say what kind of costs we've saved for the public sector, but I do hope that they will have a positive impact at an early stage. So, we have to evaluate the impact of avoiding costs as those powers start to take effect. Of course, a year from now, that would mean that we'd be reporting back on the impact in January, February and March. But, then, the year after that, we would be able to evaluate a full year of using the powers. So, that's what I'd like to do, and in terms of the regulatory impact assessment, there is an expectation for us to show, after a period of three to five years, exactly what costs have been avoided. So, we're very happy to do that, year on year, to show that that positive impact is happening.
Welsh: Dim o gwbl. Dwi ddim yn meddwl y byddwn ni'n barod i wneud hynny am o leiaf blwyddyn. Fel roeddwn i'n ei ddweud wrth Alun yn gynharach, dŷn ni wedi gosod y criteria ar gyfer y ddau brif bŵer - pwerau ar liwt fy hun a hefyd yr awdurdod safonau cwynion. Rwy'n gobeithio rŵan y bydd y pwerau yna'n cychwyn ym mis Ionawr. Mae'n anodd iawn imi, rŵan, ddweud pa fath o gostau dŷn ni wedi'u harbed i'r sector cyhoeddus, ond rwy'n gobeithio y byddan nhw'n cael effaith bositif yn gynnar iawn. Felly, mae'n rhaid inni werthuso yr effaith o osgoi costau fel y mae'r pwerau yna yn dechrau cymryd effaith. Wrth gwrs, flwyddyn i rŵan, byddai hynny'n golygu ein bod yn adrodd yn ôl ar yr effaith, efallai, o Ionawr, Mawrth ac Ebrill - Ionawr, Chwefror a Mawrth, mae'n ddrwg gen i. Ond, wedyn, y flwyddyn wedyn, buasem ni'n gallu gwerthuso blwyddyn lawn o ddefnyddio'r pwerau. Felly, dyna beth y buaswn i'n licio'i wneud, ac rwy'n meddwl, o safbwynt y regulatory impact assessment, mae disgwyliad inni ddangos, ar ôl cyfnod o dair neu bum mlynedd, beth yn union yw'r costau sydd wedi cael eu hosgoi. Dŷn ni'n hapus iawn i drio gwneud hynny, flwyddyn ar ôl blwyddyn, i ddangos bod yr effaith bositif yna'n digwydd.
English: So, can we ask what are the signs, when you'll be in front of us in a year, that we'll have fuller evidence in two years?
Welsh: Felly, gawn ni ofyn beth ydy'r arwyddion, pan fyddwch chi o'n blaenau ni mewn blwyddyn, y cawn ni dystiolaeth lawnach ymhen dwy flynedd, mewn difri?
English: In two years, certainly we'll be able to show the impact from one full year, but, to a certain extent, we're a year behind that, because if the powers start in January, a year from now we'll be able to report back on what happened in the last quarter of the current financial year, if that makes any sense.
Welsh: Mewn dwy flynedd, yn sicr, buasem ni'n gallu dangos yr effaith o flwyddyn gyfan, ond, i ryw raddau, dŷn ni flwyddyn y tu ôl iddi, achos os yw'r pwerau llawn yma'n cychwyn fis Ionawr, flwyddyn i rŵan byddwn ni'n gallu adrodd yn ôl ar beth ddigwyddodd yn chwarter olaf y flwyddyn ariannol bresennol, os yw hynny'n gwneud synnwyr.
English: Evaluation, of course, is going to be key now. The arrangements for the post-implementation review set out in the explanatory memorandum stated that the ombudsman would be required to identify separately the costs related to the new powers, in order for it to be easier to understand the new context. What arrangements have you put in place to do this, to ensure that it's clear to us what's going on?
Welsh: Mae gwerthuso, wrth gwrs, yn mynd i fod yn allweddol rŵan. Mi oedd y trefniadau ar gyfer yr adolygiad ôl-weithredu gafodd ei nodi yn y memorandwm esboniadol yn dweud y byddai hi'n ofynnol ichi nodi ar wahân y costau sy'n gysylltiedig â'r pwerau newydd, er mwyn ei gwneud hi'n haws i ddeall y cyd-destun newydd. Pa drefniadau sydd gennych chi mewn lle i wneud hynny, i wneud yn siŵr ei bod hi'n glir i ni beth sy'n mynd ymlaen?
English: Well, the arrangements are in place, and that's what Dave was talking about earlier. We know exactly what staff we've recruited. We have purchase orders that have been delineated very clearly. We monitor from month to month, and the management team does report back from month to month. So, the system is in place at present to ensure that we don't miss anything.
Welsh: Wel, mae trefniadau mewn lle, dyna be oedd Dave yn sôn amdano fe yn gynharach. Dŷn ni'n gwybod yn union pa staff dŷn ni wedi eu recriwtio. Mae gennym ni purchase orders sydd wedi cael eu 'annotate-o' yn glir iawn. Dŷn ni'n monitro o fis i fis, ac mae'r tîm reoli yn adrodd nôl o fis i fis. Felly, mae'r gyfundrefn yna ar hyn o bryd wedi sicrhau nad ydyn ni'n colli dim byd.
English: Any further questions? Everybody happy?
Welsh: Unrhyw gwestiynau pellach? Pawb yn hapus?
English: Thank you very much for your evidence. Thank you for the estimate. We'll now be analysing what we've heard. You will have a copy of the transcript as usual to check for factual accuracy. But may I thank you for attending this morning?
Welsh: Iawn. Diolch o galon ichi am eich tystiolaeth. Diolch am yr amcangyfrif. Mi fyddwn ni nawr yn pwyso a mesur yr hyn dŷn ni wedi ei glywed. Mi gewch chi gopi o'r trawsgrifiad fel pob tro, wrth gwrs, i'w siecio ar gyfer cywirdeb. Gaf i ddiolch ichi am fod gyda ni'r bore yma?
English: Thank you very much, committee. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn ichi, bwyllgor. Diolch.
English: The committee will now - well, I propose, under Standing Order 17.42 (vi), to resolve to exclude the public from items 5, 7 and 8 of today's meeting. Are Members content? Yes. Thank you very much. We'll move, therefore, to private session.
Welsh: Mi wnaiff y pwyllgor nawr - wel, dwi'n cynnig, yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 17.42 (vi), fod y pwyllgor yn gwahardd y cyhoedd ar gyfer eitemau 5, 7 ac 8 o gyfarfod heddiw. Ydy Aelodau'n fodlon â hynny? Diolch yn fawr iawn. Mi wnawn ni symud, felly, i sesiwn breifat.