English: Well, first of all, I do have confidence in the chair. Secondly, this matter is something that needs fuller investigation, and Assembly Members will be told what the outcome of that investigation actually is. He mentioned the issue of staff car parking. This has been something that's been in the news recently. It is important, I think, that the reasoning behind the court case is understood. The reason why enforcement was put in place was because there had been a death on the site, partially due to illegal parking and partially due to the traffic flow going through the site. Some 16,000 traffic movements go through the University Hospital of Wales at the moment, and it is right that there is proper enforcement of illegal and unsafe parking. That has to happen on a site that is this busy. Why these individuals went to court and what advice they received is difficult to know. I do know that one of them in particular had 59 parking tickets. Again, no explanation is given as to why that is. It's unfortunate for those individuals - I understand that - but it is hugely important that there is proper enforcement on the UHW site in terms of safety, and to stop people parking there all day, in order to make sure that patients who arrive on site do have places to park. So, enforcement has to happen. Otherwise, are we saying that people can park there without any fear of any kind of penalty? Things have gone very far with regard to three individuals; it's difficult to know why that is. I can say that the idea that they face costs of £150,000 is nonsense. We don't know where that figure has come from and that has absolutely no basis in fact. But UHW is a site where there is a great deal of traffic movement and there does need to be enforcement regarding that movement.
Welsh: Wel, yn gyntaf oll, mae gen i ffydd yn y cadeirydd. Yn ail, mae'r mater hwn yn rhywbeth y mae angen ymchwilio iddo ymhellach, a bydd Aelodau'r Cynulliad yn cael eu hysbysu am beth fydd canlyniad yr ymchwiliad hwnnw mewn gwirionedd. Soniodd am y mater o barcio ceir staff. Mae hyn wedi bod yn rhywbeth sydd wedi bod yn y newyddion yn ddiweddar. Mae'n bwysig, rwy'n credu, fod y rhesymeg sy'n sail i'r achos llys yn cael ei ddeall. Y rheswm pam y cymerwyd camau gorfodi oedd oherwydd y bu marwolaeth ar y safle, yn rhannol o ganlyniad i barcio anghyfreithlon ac yn rhannol oherwydd llif y traffig sy'n mynd drwy'r safle. Mae tua 16,000 o symudiadau traffig yn mynd trwy Ysbyty Athrofaol Cymru ar hyn o bryd, ac mae'n iawn y ceir gorfodaeth briodol ar gyfer parcio anghyfreithlon ac anniogel. Mae'n rhaid i hynny ddigwydd ar safle sydd mor brysur â hyn. Mae'n anodd gwybod pam yr aeth yr unigolion hyn i'r llys a pha gyngor a gawsant. Gwn fod un ohonynt yn benodol wedi cael 59 o docynnau parcio. Unwaith eto, ni roddir unrhyw esboniad pam mae hynny'n bod. Mae'n anffodus i'r unigolion hynny - rwy'n deall hynny - ond mae'n hynod bwysig bod gorfodaeth briodol ar safle Ysbyty Athrofaol Cymru o ran diogelwch, ac i atal pobl rhag parcio yno drwy'r dydd, er mwyn gwneud yn siŵr bod gan gleifion sy'n cyrraedd y safle leoedd i barcio. Felly, mae'n rhaid i orfodi ddigwydd. Fel arall, a ydym ni'n dweud y gall pobl barcio yno heb ofni unrhyw fath o gosb? Mae pethau wedi mynd yn bell iawn o ran tri unigolyn; mae'n anodd gwybod pam mae hynny'n bod. Gallaf ddweud bod y syniad eu bod yn wynebu costau o £150,000 yn lol. Nid ydym yn gwybod o ble mae'r ffigur hwnnw wedi dod ac nid oes unrhyw sail iddo mewn gwirionedd. Ond mae Ysbyty Athrofaol Cymru yn safle lle mae llawer iawn o draffig yn symud, ac mae angen gorfodaeth ar gyfer y symud hwnnw.