techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you, Cabinet Secretary. I was actually very pleased to see included within your budget £1.3 million for local authorities to use to provide targeted relief to support our local businesses. However, the similar scheme in 2014-15 that should have provided similar support to our businesses actually did support some businesses at a total cost of £2.765 million, yet this represents just a 79 per cent take-up of the overall package of £3.5 million. This has been put down to the fact that there was complexity of guidance and tight timescales for application for these needy businesses. Going forward this year, how will you ensure that the time frames for local authorities and businesses to then be allowed to apply for those grants will be reasonable so that we can actually see 100 per cent take-up of this money that is specifically allocated for those businesses in need?
Welsh: Diolch i chi, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet. Roeddwn yn falch iawn mewn gwirionedd o weld bod eich cyllideb yn cynnwys £1.3 miliwn i awdurdodau lleol ei ddefnyddio er mwyn darparu cymorth wedi'i dargedu i gefnogi ein busnesau lleol. Fodd bynnag, llwyddodd y cynllun tebyg yn 2014-15, a ddylai fod wedi darparu cymorth tebyg i'n busnesau, i gefnogi rhai busnesau mewn gwirionedd, ar gost o £2.765 miliwn, ac eto nid yw hwn ond yn 79 y cant o ddefnydd ar y pecyn cyffredinol o £3.5 miliwn. Dywedir mai'r rheswm am hyn oedd cymhlethdod y canllawiau i'r busnesau anghenus hyn ynghyd ag amserlenni tynn ar gyfer gwneud cais. Wrth symud ymlaen y flwyddyn hon, sut y byddwch yn sicrhau y bydd yr amserlenni sy'n caniatáu i awdurdodau lleol a busnesau wneud cais am y grantiau hynny yn rhesymol fel y gallwn weld 100 y cant o ddefnydd o'r arian hwn, a ddyrannwyd yn benodol ar gyfer busnesau sydd mewn angen?
English: I thank the Member for the question, Llywydd. I was pleased to be able to provide what I know is a small sum of money in the grander scheme of things, £1.3 million, to local authorities to bolster their ability to provide discretionary relief to businesses in their own areas. The way in which I've tried to answer the dilemma that the Member has posed is in making that money available for local authorities to apply in that discretionary way with their own knowledge of local needs and circumstances. I think local authorities are in a better place to be able to use that very targeted amount of money to respond to businesses whose circumstances aren't captured by the larger schemes that we have in the non-domestic rates field and by not tying the money down with a lot of extra rules and regulations to give local authorities the flexibility, I hope, to be able to respond rapidly and sympathetically to businesses where there is a proper case for doing so.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn, Lywydd. Roeddwn yn falch o allu darparu swm y gwn ei fod yn swm bach o arian wrth edrych ar y darlun mawr, £1.3 miliwn, i awdurdodau lleol gryfhau eu gallu i ddarparu rhyddhad ardrethi yn ôl disgresiwn i fusnesau yn eu hardaloedd eu hunain. Y ffordd rwyf wedi ceisio ateb y cyfyng-gyngor y mae'r Aelod wedi'i grybwyll yw drwy sicrhau bod yr arian hwnnw ar gael i awdurdodau lleol ei ddefnyddio yn y modd disgresiynol hwnnw gyda'u gwybodaeth eu hunain am anghenion ac amgylchiadau lleol. Credaf fod awdurdodau lleol mewn sefyllfa well i allu defnyddio'r swm hwnnw o arian sydd wedi'i dargedu'n fanwl i ymateb i fusnesau nad yw eu hamgylchiadau yn eu gwneud yn gymwys ar gyfer y cynlluniau mwyaf sydd gennym ym maes ardrethi annomestig, a thrwy beidio â chlymu'r arian wrth lawer o reolau a rheoliadau ychwanegol er mwyn rhoi hyblygrwydd i awdurdodau lleol, rwy'n gobeithio, allu ymateb yn gyflym ac yn gydymdeimladol i fusnesau lle y ceir achos priodol dros wneud hynny.
English: 9. What additional financial provision has been made to the economy and transport portfolio to support the development of the south Wales metro?
Welsh: 9. Pa ddarpariaeth ariannol ychwanegol a wnaed i'r portffolio economi a thrafnidiaeth i gefnogi'r gwaith o ddatblygu metro de Cymru?
English: Llywydd, the 2018-19 budget includes an additional £173 million in capital allocated to the economy and transport main expenditure group to support the development of the south Wales metro. This brings the total allocated in this term to £433 million towards the total expected project investment of £734 million.
Welsh: Lywydd, mae cyllideb 2018-19 yn cynnwys £173 miliwn ychwanegol mewn cyfalaf a ddyrannwyd i brif grŵp gwariant yr economi a thrafnidiaeth i gefnogi'r gwaith o ddatblygu metro de Cymru. Golyga hyn fod cyfanswm o £433 miliwn wedi cael ei ddyrannu yn ystod y tymor hwn tuag at gyfanswm disgwyliedig o £734 miliwn o fuddsoddiad yn y prosiect.
English: Cabinet Secretary, we're aware that, of course, the funding of major infrastructure projects is going to be very adversely affected by the uncertainty over Brexit funding we might have expected in terms of structural funds, and also issues such as access to the European Investment Bank and sources such as those. What steps have been taken to actually either find an alternative for sources of funding, and what longer term steps have been taken in terms of the longer term funding of the metro project, which was originally estimated in terms of around £3 billion?
Welsh: Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, rydym yn ymwybodol, wrth gwrs, y bydd y modd yr ariennir prosiectau seilwaith mawr yn cael ei effeithio'n andwyol gan yr ansicrwydd dros gyllid Brexit y byddem wedi'i ddisgwyl o ran cronfeydd strwythurol, a hefyd materion fel mynediad at Fanc Buddsoddi Ewrop a ffynonellau tebyg. Pa gamau a gymerwyd i ddod o hyd i ffynonellau cyllid amgen, a pha gamau mwy hirdymor a gymerwyd ar gyfer ariannu'r prosiect metro yn y tymor hwy, prosiect yr amcangyfrifwyd yn wreiddiol y byddai'n costio tua £3 biliwn?
English: 10. Will the Cabinet Secretary make a statement on the use of structural funds to promote prosperity in the northern valleys?
Welsh: 10. A wnaiff Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet ddatganiad am ddefnyddio cronfeydd strwythurol i hybu ffyniant yn y cymoedd gogleddol?
English: Llywydd, we continue to maximise available EU structural funds to support our objectives for growth and jobs across Wales. That includes, of course, the northern Valleys. So far, we have invested over £1.4 billion for that purpose, and that supports a total investment of £2.6 billion.
Welsh: Lywydd, rydym yn parhau i fanteisio i'r eithaf ar gronfeydd strwythurol yr UE sydd ar gael i gefnogi ein hamcanion ar gyfer twf a swyddi ledled Cymru. Mae hynny'n cynnwys, wrth gwrs, y Cymoedd gogleddol. Hyd yma, rydym wedi buddsoddi dros £1.4 biliwn i'r diben hwnnw, ac mae hwnnw'n cefnogi cyfanswm buddsoddiad o £2.6 biliwn.
English: Thank you, Cabinet Secretary. The Industrial Communities Alliance have suggested that a new UK regional development fund should be central to any post-Brexit regional policy. However, they've also pointed out that this needs to be managed on a devolved basis, and that any moneys allocated should be above and beyond that due via the Barnett formula. Getting this right is key to the prosperity of the northern Valleys, so does the Cabinet Secretary agree with me that promises made during the EU referendum campaign, that Wales wouldn't lose out on a penny, need to be honoured?
Welsh: Diolch i chi, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet. Mae'r Gynghrair Cymunedau Diwydiannol wedi awgrymu y dylai cronfa datblygu rhanbarthol newydd ar gyfer y DU fod yn ganolog i unrhyw bolisi rhanbarthol yn dilyn Brexit. Fodd bynnag, maent hefyd wedi nodi bod angen i hwn gael ei reoli ar sail ddatganoledig, ac y dylai unrhyw arian a ddyrennir fod y tu hwnt i'r hyn sy'n ddyledus drwy fformiwla Barnett. Mae cael hyn yn iawn yn allweddol i ffyniant y Cymoedd gogleddol, felly a yw Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn cytuno bod angen cadw'r addewidion a gafodd eu gwneud yn ystod ymgyrch refferendwm yr EU, na fydd Cymru yn colli yr un geiniog?
English: Well, absolutely, Llywydd. Those promises have to be honoured. It would be a very strange irony indeed if those people who voted to leave the European Union found that Wales does less well out of its membership of the United Kingdom than it did out of its membership of the European Union. That's why the money that has come to Wales from the European Union - money that, you will remember, we get because we qualify for it under the rules - must flow to us after we leave the European Union. I've made a case to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury as to how that could be done. I will be restating that case when I meet her on Friday of this week. We believe very firmly that regional development is a devolved responsibility of this National Assembly, that we are best placed to make sure that we can go on doing that successfully in the future, but we need the money that has come to Wales for that purpose while we've been in the EU to continue beyond it, and we look to the UK Government to ensure that that takes place.
Welsh: Wel, yn hollol, Lywydd. Mae'n rhaid cadw'r addewidion hynny. Byddai'n eironi rhyfedd iawn yn wir pe bai'r bobl a bleidleisiodd dros adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd yn gweld bod Cymru yn waeth ei byd o fod yn aelod o'r Deyrnas Unedig nag o fod yn aelod o'r Undeb Ewropeaidd. Dyna pam fod yn rhaid i'r arian sydd wedi dod i Gymru o'r Undeb Ewropeaidd - arian a gawn, fe gofiwch, oherwydd ein bod yn gymwys i'w gael yn ôl y rheolau - lifo yma wedi i ni adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd. Rwyf wedi cyflwyno achos i Brif Ysgrifennydd y Trysorlys mewn perthynas â sut y gellid gwneud hynny. Byddaf yn ailddatgan yr achos hwnnw pan fyddaf yn ei chyfarfod ddydd Gwener yr wythnos hon. Rydym yn credu'n gryf iawn fod datblygu rhanbarthol yn gyfrifoldeb datganoledig i'r Cynulliad Cenedlaethol hwn, ac mai ni sydd yn y sefyllfa orau i wneud yn siŵr ein bod yn gallu parhau i wneud hynny'n llwyddiannus yn y dyfodol, ond rydym angen i'r arian sydd wedi dod i Gymru at y diben hwnnw tra buom yn aelod o'r UE barhau y tu hwnt i hynny, ac rydym yn disgwyl i Lywodraeth y DU sicrhau bod hynny'n digwydd.
English: The next item is questions to the leader of the house, and the first question is from Simon Thomas.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf, felly, yw'r cwestiynau i arweinydd y tŷ, a'r cwestiwn cyntaf - Simon Thomas.
English: Thank you very much for that question. I intend to carry out a procurement exercise shortly, with a view to the new project starting in spring this year. I'll be making a statement later this month to set out more detail about the new scheme.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn i chi am y cwestiwn hwnnw. Rwy'n bwriadu cynnal ymarfer caffael yn fuan, gyda golwg ar y prosiect newydd sy'n dechrau yn y gwanwyn eleni. Byddaf yn gwneud datganiad yn ddiweddarach y mis hwn i nodi mwy o fanylion am y cynllun newydd.
English: Thank you very much for that response. I do welcome the fact that there is to be a scheme, because we know that the predecessor scheme, which is coming to an end, hasn't reached all parts of Wales. I know that you don't have the full facts and the full report as yet, but there are numerous villages that have reported back that there are cables still hanging from poles and that the work hasn't been completed, and that there are parts of Wales, which were never going to be reached under the previous scheme, that may need a different, smarter solution in order to deliver for them. So, two questions, if I may: I think you've mentioned in the past £80 million for this - is that the figure that we still have, and do you think that that's sufficient, or will you need to add to that? And how much real opportunity is there for another provider to come in to help in this process, because I do fear that putting all our eggs in the BT Openreach basket has brought us to the current situation where, quite simply, we can't actually make an omelette from those eggs?
Welsh: Diolch am hynny. Rwy'n croesawu'r ffaith bod yna gynllun, wrth gwrs, achos rŷm ni'n gwybod bod y cynllun blaenorol, sydd wedi dod i ben, heb gyrraedd pob man. Rwy'n gwybod nad oes gyda chi'r ffeithiau llawn - yr adroddiad llawn - eto, ond mae yna bentrefi di-ri sydd wedi adrodd nôl fod yna cables yn dal i hongian oddi ar y polion ac nad yw'r gwaith wedi cyrraedd pen y daith, a hefyd bod yna rannau o Gymru, nad oedd byth yn mynd i gael eu cyrraedd o dan y cynllun blaenorol, sydd angen ateb, efallai, gwahanol, mwy clyfar er mwyn eu cyrraedd nhw. Dau gwestiwn, felly, os caf i fod yn glir: rwy'n credu eich bod wedi sôn yn y gorffennol am £80 miliwn ar gyfer hyn - ai dyna'r swm sydd gyda ni o hyd, ac a ydych chi'n credu bod hynny'n ddigonol, neu a fydd angen ychwanegu at hynny? A faint o gyfle go iawn sydd i ddarparwr arall ddod i mewn i helpu yn y broses yma, achos rwy'n ofni bod rhoi ein hwyau i gyd ym masged BT Openreach wedi cyrraedd y sefyllfa bresennol, lle nad ydym ni, yn syml iawn, yn gallu cyrraedd yr wyau i wneud yr omlet?
English: Simon Thomas makes a number of good points that he's made on a number of occasions to me about the way superfast has worked. I think it's fair to say that the Superfast Cymru scheme has been a hugely successful scheme for those people who've received superfast from it, and they are an enormous number of people across Wales. It's in the nature of the beast that we're not inundated by letters from people who are grateful to have received it. Instead, we receive a lot of correspondence from those people who find themselves at the other end of the project, and that's very understandable. We won't know for a number of weeks yet whether the contract was completely fulfilled, but we have good indications that they did very well, and we're very hopeful that they did in fact fulfil the contract. But the contract did end on 31 December, at midnight, and therefore, obviously, if the work wasn't done by then, the Welsh Government isn't paying for it. So, that leaves people in a very frustrating position. I will be making an announcement early next week, so I'm going to avoid the temptation to steal my own thunder by pre-announcing it, but we are very aware of the predicament of communities who've been left there, and of the number of people who were promised superfast under the first scheme and who fell off the end for various reasons. We very much have those people in mind when we're looking at the announcements that I'm hoping to make early next week, as it happens.
Welsh: Mae Simon Thomas yn gwneud nifer o bwyntiau da y mae wedi'u gwneud ar nifer o achlysuron ynglŷn â'r ffordd y mae band eang cyflym iawn wedi gweithio. Rwy'n credu ei bod yn deg dweud bod cynllun Cyflymu Cymru wedi bod yn gynllun hynod lwyddiannus i'r bobl sydd wedi cael band eang cyflym iawn o ganlyniad iddo, ac maent yn nifer enfawr o bobl ledled Cymru. Mae'n rhan o natur pethau nad ydym yn derbyn llu o lythyrau gan bobl sy'n ddiolchgar amdano. Yn hytrach, rydym yn cael llawer o lythyrau gan y bobl sydd ar ben arall y prosiect, ac mae hynny'n ddealladwy iawn. Ni fyddwn yn gwybod am nifer o wythnosau eto pa un a gafodd y cytundeb ei gyflawni'n llawn, ond mae gennym arwyddion da eu bod wedi gwneud yn dda iawn, ac rydym yn obeithiol iawn eu bod wedi cyflawni'r cytundeb mewn gwirionedd. Ond daeth y cytundeb i ben ar 31 Rhagfyr, am hanner nos, ac felly, yn amlwg, os na chafodd y gwaith ei wneud erbyn hynny, nid yw Llywodraeth Cymru yn talu amdano. Felly, mae hynny'n gadael pobl mewn sefyllfa rwystredig iawn. Byddaf yn gwneud cyhoeddiad ddechrau'r wythnos nesaf, felly rwyf am osgoi'r demtasiwn o achub y blaen arnaf fi fy hun drwy ei gyhoeddi cyn hynny, ond rydym yn ymwybodol iawn o helynt cymunedau sydd wedi cael eu gadael ar ôl, ac o nifer y bobl a gafodd addewid y byddent yn cael band eang cyflym iawn o dan y cynllun cyntaf, ac a gafodd eu gadael ar ôl am amryw o resymau. Yn sicr, byddwn yn cadw'r bobl hynny mewn cof pan fyddwn yn edrych ar y cyhoeddiadau rwy'n gobeithio eu gwneud ddechrau'r wythnos nesaf, fel y mae'n digwydd.
English: Please don't pay BT for Princes Gate. During the time I've been told on numerous occasions that Princes Gate will get fast broadband. In fact, last year, the head of Superfast Cymru - I won't name him - wrote and told me that a second pass would see Princes Gate be upgraded to superfast broadband by the autumn of 2017. The response from the leader of Openreach: 'The infrastructure serving your community forms part of a programme we were running which ended on Sunday 31 December 2017. This is a hard stop' - we're not doing anymore. And it's not just Princes Gate. Cynwyl Elfed, Hermon, Lawrenny, Martletwy, bits of Pembroke - they've all got this. They had the promise, they were told categorically - and Llanpumsaint - they were going to get it, and now they're not. I don't actually hold you personally responsible, Minister, because I know that you really believe in the delivery of this, but I would like you to talk fairly strongly to BT and to Openreach. They cannot make promises to people and then just basically say, 'Tough luck. It's finished. Too bad', because these people have lives to live, businesses to run, kids to educate. Broadband, superfast, is today's universal provision we all need, and I fail to see why my constituency should be so disadvantaged.
Welsh: Os gwelwch yn dda, peidiwch â thalu BT am Princes Gate. Yn ystod yr amser dywedwyd wrthyf ar sawl achlysur y bydd Princes Gate yn cael band eang cyflym. Yn wir, y llynedd, ysgrifennodd pennaeth Cyflymu Cymru ataf - nid wyf am ei enwi - yn dweud y byddai ail gynllun yn sicrhau bod Princes Gate yn cael ei uwchraddio i fand eang cyflym iawn erbyn hydref 2017. Dyma'r ymateb gan arweinydd Openreach: Mae'r seilwaith sy'n gwasanaethu eich cymuned yn rhan o raglen roeddem yn ei chynnal a ddaeth i ben ar ddydd Sul 31 Rhagfyr 2017. Mae'r cynllun hwn wedi dod i ben - nid ydym yn gwneud rhagor. Ac nid Princes Gate yn unig. Mae Cynwyl Elfed, Hermon, Lawrenny, Martletwy, darnau o Benfro - maent i gyd wedi cael eu siomi. Cawsant addewid, dywedwyd wrthynt yn bendant - a Llanpumsaint - y byddent yn ei gael, ac ni fyddant yn ei gael bellach. Nid wyf yn credu eich bod yn bersonol gyfrifol am hyn, Weinidog, oherwydd gwn eich bod yn credu'n gryf mewn cyflawni'r cynllun hwn, ond buaswn yn hoffi i chi siarad yn go gadarn â BT ac Openreach. Ni allant wneud addewidion i bobl ac yna dweud, 'Anlwcus. Mae wedi dod i ben. Trueni', oherwydd mae gan y bobl hyn fywydau i'w byw, busnesau i'w cynnal, plant i'w haddysgu. Mae band eang cyflym iawn yn ddarpariaeth gyffredinol sydd ei hangen ar bawb heddiw, ac ni allaf weld pam y dylai fy etholaeth fod o dan gymaint o anfantais.
English: I think the Member has made a number of points that are well worth considering. As I said, in considering what we're going to do for the successor schemes, we are of course very mindful of the people who have had promises made to them in various circumstances and , for various complex engineering reasons and so on, haven't been able to be met under the first scheme. Angela Burns will be the first person to say that I shouldn't be paying for something that is outwith the contract, and of course there has been an end to the contract, and we've been very certain about that end, because, of course, we have to behave in an appropriate financial way with regard to the contract and so on. But our primary intention here is to connect people to broadband - this isn't a financial exercise, it's an exercise in getting the infrastructure out there. So, we've had a number of conversations with Openreach BT about where the infrastructure build has gone to, and bear in mind, they are investing their money in that - they are not paid until those premises are connected. So, they have invested money in building out to those premises and it's in their commercial interest to make sure that people are connected as much as anything else. We've had some considerable conversations with them about people in the position that you mentioned, for a number of your constituents, and indeed people across Wales who are in the 4 per cent of people who are at the end of the contract. I will be making some announcements next week, which I think may bring some comfort to some of the communities that you mentioned.
Welsh: Credaf fod yr Aelod wedi gwneud nifer o bwyntiau sy'n werth eu hystyried. Fel y dywedais, wrth ystyried yr hyn y byddwn yn ei wneud ar gyfer y cynlluniau olynol, rydym yn ymwybodol iawn, wrth gwrs, o'r bobl a gafodd addewidion mewn gwahanol amgylchiadau ac na chafodd eu bodloni, am amrywiol resymau peirianyddol cymhleth, o dan y cynllun cyntaf. Angela Burns fydd y person cyntaf i ddweud na ddylwn dalu am rywbeth sy'n groes i'r cytundeb, ac wrth gwrs mae'r cytundeb wedi dod i ben, ac rydym wedi bod yn bendant iawn ynglŷn â hynny, oherwydd, wrth gwrs, mae'n rhaid i ni ymddwyn mewn ffordd ariannol briodol mewn perthynas â'r cytundeb ac yn y blaen. Ond ein prif fwriad yma yw cysylltu pobl â band eang - nid ymarfer ariannol yw hwn, ond ymarfer i gael y seilwaith yno. Felly, rydym wedi cael nifer o sgyrsiau gyda BT Openreach ynglŷn â lle aeth y gwaith ar adeiladu'r seilwaith, a chofiwch, maent yn buddsoddi eu harian yn hwnnw - nid ydynt yn cael eu talu hyd nes y bydd y safleoedd hynny wedi'u cysylltu. Felly, maent wedi buddsoddi arian mewn adeiladu allan at y safleoedd hynny ac mae gwneud yn siŵr fod pobl yn cael eu cysylltu o fudd masnachol iddynt hwy yn gymaint ag unrhyw beth arall. Rydym wedi cael cryn dipyn o sgyrsiau gyda hwy am bobl yn y sefyllfa a grybwyllwyd gennych, ar ran nifer o'ch etholwyr, a phobl ledled Cymru yn wir sy'n perthyn i'r 4 y cant o bobl sy'n weddill ar ddiwedd y cytundeb. Byddaf yn gwneud cyhoeddiadau yr wythnos nesaf, a chredaf y gallent fod yn rhywfaint o gysur i rai o'r cymunedau a grybwyllwyd gennych.
English: Does the leader of the house, with her responsibilities for broadband and for equality, agree with me that marriage equality actually has very little to do with the superfast broadband roll-out? Does she also concur with me that the comments from the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, quite flippantly connecting the two, are little more than just another demonstration of how crass, insensitive and out of touch the Tory UK Government is?
Welsh: A yw arweinydd y tŷ, gyda'i chyfrifoldebau dros fand eang a chydraddoldeb, yn cytuno â mi nad oes gan gydraddoldeb priodas, mewn gwirionedd, fawr ddim i'w wneud â chyflwyno band eang cyflym iawn? A yw hi hefyd yn cytuno â mi fod y sylwadau gan yr Ysgrifennydd Gwladol dros Ogledd Iwerddon, a oedd yn cysylltu'r ddau beth yn hollol ddifeddwl, yn fawr mwy nag enghraifft arall o ba mor dwp, ansensitif ac allan ohoni yw Llywodraeth Dorïaidd y DU?
English: I think the remarks made by the Secretary of State are really quite shocking, actually. Quite clearly, marriage equality is not the same thing as being connected to broadband, in any regard. Obviously, being an LGBT+ community member is a protected characteristic and ought to be treated sensitively as such. The whole issue of marriage equality in Northern Ireland is of course not one for this devolved Government, but to equate the thing with an infrastructure roll-out is clearly highly insensitive and not something that we would want to see done in any circumstance.
Welsh: Credaf fod y sylwadau a wnaeth yr Ysgrifennydd Gwladol yn eithaf syfrdanol, mewn gwirionedd. Yn amlwg, nid yw cydraddoldeb priodas yr un peth â chysylltedd band eang mewn unrhyw fodd. Yn amlwg, mae bod yn aelod o'r gymuned LGBT+ yn nodwedd warchodedig a dylid ei thrin mewn modd sensitif fel y cyfryw. Nid yw cydraddoldeb priodas yng Ngogledd Iwerddon yn fater ar gyfer y Llywodraeth ddatganoledig hon wrth gwrs, ond mae cymharu'r peth â chyflwyno seilwaith yn amlwg yn ansensitif iawn ac nid yw'n rhywbeth y byddem yn dymuno ei weld o dan unrhyw amgylchiadau.