English: Well, I think quite a number of the points that Altaf Hussain mentioned were actually addressed in my statement, so I'll just give him a chance to reflect on that, and if he has further questions I'm happy to answer them. On the specific question of the cancer centre, that is not covered within the scope of this review, because that is a scheme to give access to a project; it is not a local authority or Welsh Government highway scheme. And similarly access roads to windfarms. Again, we are not being fanatical about this. There is a case for road building, I'm not saying there isn't, but it can't be the default response to every single transport problem we have, which it has been often. He interestingly mentioned the UK Government. Of course, as well as committing to reaching net zero by 2050, they've announced a £27 billion road programme. They seem to think those two things are compatible, I don't. But they are indicating a change of thinking, as he mentioned, because of the fact that people are commuting less to work and that is likely to continue. So I'd very much welcome a change of heart by the UK Government. I think we have been quite consistent in our approach: we've set out a Wales transport strategy, that has a commitment to modal shift, and that requires a shift of resources and focus. We're not stopping building infrastructure - in terms of his point about the economic impact - we're just building different infrastructure, infrastructure that is resilient to the changes of climate change, which all parties say they want to tackle. But again, when it comes to the particulars of making the difficult choices necessary to make that real, people resile from it. We will not.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n credu bod cryn nifer o'r pwyntiau y soniodd Altaf Hussain amdanyn nhw wedi cael sylw yn fy natganiad, felly rhoddaf gyfle iddo fyfyrio ar hynny, ac os oes ganddo ragor o gwestiynau rwy'n hapus i'w hateb. O ran y cwestiwn penodol ynghylch y ganolfan ganser, nid yw hynny wedi'i gynnwys yng nghwmpas yr adolygiad hwn, oherwydd cynllun yw hwnnw i roi mynediad i brosiect; nid yw'n gynllun priffyrdd awdurdod lleol na Llywodraeth Cymru. Ac yn yr un modd ffyrdd mynediad i ffermydd gwynt. Unwaith eto, nid ydym yn bod yn eithafol ynglŷn â hyn. Mae achos dros adeiladu ffyrdd, nid wyf yn gwrthddweud hynny, ond ni all fod yr ymateb diofyn i bob un broblem drafnidiaeth sydd gennym, sef yr hyn y mae wedi bod yn aml. Soniodd yn ddiddorol am Lywodraeth y DU. Wrth gwrs, yn ogystal ag ymrwymo i gyrraedd sero net erbyn 2050, maen nhw wedi cyhoeddi rhaglen ffordd gwerth £27 biliwn. Maen nhw fel petaent yn credu bod y ddau beth hynny'n gydnaws. Dydw i ddim yn credu hynny. Ond maen nhw'n dangos bod yna rywfaint o newid meddwl, fel y soniodd, oherwydd y ffaith bod pobl yn cymudo llai i'r gwaith ac mae hynny'n debygol o barhau. Felly, byddwn yn croesawu'n fawr newid bwriad ar ran Llywodraeth y DU. Rwy'n credu ein bod wedi bod yn eithaf cyson yn ein dull ni o weithredu: rydym wedi nodi strategaeth drafnidiaeth i Gymru, sydd ag ymrwymiad i newid dulliau teithio, ac mae hynny'n gofyn am newid adnoddau a phwyslais. Nid ydym yn rhoi'r gorau i adeiladu seilwaith - o ran ei bwynt am yr effaith economaidd - dim ond adeiladu seilwaith gwahanol yr ydym, seilwaith sy'n gallu gwrthsefyll y newidiadau yn sgil newid hinsawdd, y mae pob plaid yn dweud ei bod am fynd i'r afael â nhw. Ond eto, pan ddaw'n fater o wneud y dewisiadau anodd sydd eu hangen i wneud hynny'n real, mae pobl yn ailfeddwl. Ni wnawn ni hynny.