English: I too would very much like to welcome this. I don't think we talk about fun enough in this Senedd sometimes, and it is good to see that emphasis on children and young people needing to be able to enjoy, as well as learn, and be supported. My concern is very similar to Gareth Davies's in terms of, yes, there will be something for everyone, but can everyone access? I accept that last year had to be set up quickly, but I am concerned that the guidance is still not prescriptive enough to ensure that every child and young person will be able to access and benefit. I was particularly concerned in the statement that you referenced that funding can also be used to cover some transport costs. You may have heard me raise with the Prif Weinidog earlier the fact that school transport costs and public transport are already a barrier to pupils accessing school. So, this is already something that we know is a barrier just to accessing school, let alone extra-curricular activities, where you may have more than one child to try and reach such activities and placements. I just wonder how are we going to be more prescriptive and targeted to ensure that those children and young people that missed out on those opportunities to participate in programmes last year will be targeted this time, and what lessons were learnt by local authorities through the independent assessment, because obviously it did come through in that assessment that senior stakeholders and local authority leads highlighted the importance of it, but that there was a concern that there was a risk, if they weren't able to retain funding for transport, that low-income families would still not access this. Everybody sang the praises of that programme; it's not about the quality, but it's about that access. A particular concern as well, as was mentioned by Gareth Davies, was that not all the provision was suitable for children with additional needs and disabilities, and obviously quite specialised transport is available for children who may have physical access needs and so on to reach school settings and so on, but this wasn't available for these programmes. So, how are we going to ensure that children with additional needs and disabilities are able to be included in this provision? Obviously, the inclusion of Welsh-language medium provision was also stipulated in the programme guidance, yet some local authority leads reported a lack of local providers with Welsh language skills and limited interest among children, young people and families for Welsh provision. Also, as you're well aware, children and young people often have to travel further for Welsh-medium education in some parts of Wales, meaning that there isn't an accessible public transport or walkable route, therefore how are we going to ensure that there's also an opportunity for children and young people to participate in the Welsh language as well? So, as I said, I very much welcome it; it's not anything negative, but I am concerned and I would like to reiterate - . I visited Rhondda foodbank recently, and they relayed to me their concern that headteachers had shared that their biggest concern about programmes last year was that the most vulnerable children that would benefit the most just weren't able to reach those places. I just worry that not making it a requirement or tackling that transport issue will mean that the same children and young people miss out again. Finally, if I may, also in the research, in the detailed analysis, it mentioned that targeting those aged 16 and over was particularly challenging and that they are harder to reach and engage. Suggestions included running afternoon or evening activities or youth work, offering volunteering, mentoring and work experience opportunities. Have some of these suggestions been incorporated into the Summer of Fun plans? Diolch yn fawr iawn.
Welsh: Hoffwn innau hefyd groesawu hyn yn fawr iawn. Nid wyf yn credu ein bod yn siarad am ddigon o hwyl yn y Senedd hon weithiau, ac mae'n dda gweld y pwyslais hwnnw ar blant a phobl ifanc sydd angen gallu mwynhau, yn ogystal â dysgu, a chael eu cefnogi. Mae fy mhryder yn debyg iawn i bryder Gareth Davies o ran, ie, y bydd rhywbeth at ddant pawb, ond a all pawb ei gyrraedd? Rwy'n derbyn y bu'n rhaid sefydlu'r llynedd yn gyflym, ond rwy'n pryderu nad yw'r canllawiau'n ddigon rhagnodol o hyd i sicrhau y bydd pob plentyn a pherson ifanc yn gallu mynd iddyn nhw a chael budd ohonyn nhw. Roeddwn i'n arbennig o bryderus yn y datganiad eich bod wedi cyfeirio at y ffaith y gellir defnyddio cyllid hefyd i dalu am rai costau trafnidiaeth. Efallai eich bod wedi fy nghlywed yn codi gyda'r Prif Weinidog yn gynharach y ffaith bod costau cludiant i'r ysgol a thrafnidiaeth gyhoeddus eisoes yn rhwystr i ddisgyblion sy'n defnyddio'r ysgol. Felly, mae hyn eisoes yn rhywbeth y gwyddom ei fod yn rhwystr i gyrraedd yr ysgol yn unig, heb sôn am weithgareddau allgyrsiol, lle mae'n bosibl bod gennych fwy nag un plentyn i geisio cyrraedd gweithgareddau a lleoliadau o'r fath. Tybed sut y byddwn ni'n fwy rhagnodol a thargedu yn fwy i sicrhau y bydd y plant a'r bobl ifanc hynny a gollodd y cyfleoedd hynny i gymryd rhan mewn rhaglenni y llynedd yn cael eu targedu y tro hwn, a pha wersi a ddysgwyd gan awdurdodau lleol drwy'r asesiad annibynnol, oherwydd mae'n amlwg iddo ddod yn amlwg yn yr asesiad hwnnw bod uwch randdeiliaid ac arweinwyr awdurdodau lleol wedi tynnu sylw at bwysigrwydd hynny, ond bod pryder bod risg, pe na baen nhw'n gallu cadw cyllid ar gyfer trafnidiaeth, na fyddai teuluoedd incwm isel yn cael mynediad at hyn o hyd. Roedd pawb yn canu clodydd y rhaglen honno; nid yw'n ymwneud â'r ansawdd, ond mae'n ymwneud â'r mynediad hwnnw. Un pryder penodol hefyd, fel y soniodd Gareth Davies, oedd nad oedd yr holl ddarpariaeth yn addas ar gyfer plant ag anableddau ac anghenion ychwanegol, ac mae'n amlwg bod cludiant eithaf arbenigol ar gael i blant a allai fod ag anghenion mynediad corfforol ac yn y blaen i gyrraedd lleoliadau ysgol ac yn y blaen, ond nid oedd hyn ar gael ar gyfer y rhaglenni hyn. Felly, sut ydym ni'n mynd i sicrhau bod plant ag anableddau ac anghenion ychwanegol yn gallu cael eu cynnwys yn y ddarpariaeth hon? Yn amlwg, roedd cynnwys darpariaeth cyfrwng Cymraeg hefyd wedi'i nodi yng nghanllawiau'r rhaglen, ac eto nododd rhai arweinwyr awdurdodau lleol ddiffyg darparwyr lleol â sgiliau Cymraeg a diddordeb cyfyngedig ymhlith plant, pobl ifanc a theuluoedd am ddarpariaeth Gymraeg. Hefyd, fel y gwyddoch chi'n iawn, mae plant a phobl ifanc yn aml yn gorfod teithio ymhellach ar gyfer addysg cyfrwng Cymraeg mewn rhai rhannau o Gymru, sy'n golygu nad oes trafnidiaeth gyhoeddus hygyrch na llwybr cerdded, felly sut ydym ni'n mynd i sicrhau bod cyfle hefyd i blant a phobl ifanc gymryd rhan yn y Gymraeg? Felly, fel y dywedais i, rwy'n ei groesawu'n fawr; nid yw'n ddim byd negyddol, ond rwy'n bryderus a hoffwn ailadrodd - . Ymwelais â banc bwyd y Rhondda yn ddiweddar, a gwnaethon nhw fynegi eu pryder wrthyf fod penaethiaid wedi rhannu mai eu pryder mwyaf am raglenni y llynedd oedd nad oedd y plant mwyaf agored i niwed a fyddai'n elwa fwyaf yn gallu cyrraedd y lleoedd hynny. Rwy'n poeni y bydd peidio â'i wneud yn ofyniad neu fynd i'r afael â mater trafnidiaeth yn golygu y bydd yr un plant a phobl ifanc yn colli allan eto. Yn olaf, os caf i, hefyd yn yr ymchwil, yn y dadansoddiad manwl, soniodd fod targedu'r rhai 16 oed a hŷn yn arbennig o heriol a'u bod yn anos eu cyrraedd ac i ymgysylltu â nhw. Roedd yr awgrymiadau'n cynnwys cynnal gweithgareddau prynhawn neu gyda'r nos neu waith ieuenctid, cynnig cyfleoedd gwirfoddoli, mentora a phrofiad gwaith. A yw rhai o'r awgrymiadau hyn wedi'u cynnwys yng nghynlluniau Haf o Hwyl? Diolch yn fawr iawn.