English: Thank you for those, broadly, three questions. On the first point, I'm not aware that the proposed merger has had any impact on the delivery of services; it's not been a point that's been raised by anybody with concerns that, somehow, that's a factor in the quality of care and in this cluster of cases of concern. The serious incident reporting is what's led to us looking again at the cluster of cases, the number of them, the timeliness of reporting and the learning to be taken from those. There have been internal reviews of each of these, but, to look again to understand that, for this number clustered within the health board, we should take the opportunity to review matters now and not wait for a later point of reference. And that's why I've commissioned the independent review. That's why I've been clear in my statement and announcement today, and I think that the terms of reference will be broad enough for the two royal colleges, if they think it is necessary, to look further, because broadly this cluster of cases happened over a two-year period. If they wish to look back further, then they should have the ability to do so, and I'm certainly not looking to set either a timescale to prevent that or terms of reference to unnecessarily trammel what they would wish to review and look into, to provide us - as I said in answer to Angela Burns, Dawn Bowden and Rhun ap Iorwerth - with the sort of review and the sort of report that they're prepared to put the professional names of the two royal colleges to, to give the public the sort of confidence and reassurance that we would all want and, equally, to provide us with recommendations for further improvement and action, whether that is in this health board or, more broadly, across the whole healthcare system.
Welsh: Diolch i chi am eich tri chwestiwn, yn fras. Ar y pwynt cyntaf, nid wyf yn ymwybodol bod yr uniad arfaethedig wedi cael unrhyw effaith ar gyflenwad y gwasanaethau; nid oedd hwnnw'n bwynt a godwyd gan unrhyw un â phryderon bod hynny, rywsut, yn ffactor yn ansawdd y gofal ac yn y clwstwr hwn o achosion sy'n peri pryder. Cofnodi digwyddiadau difrifol yw'r hyn sydd wedi ein harwain ni i edrych eto ar y clwstwr o achosion, eu nifer, cyflymder yr adroddiadau a'r hyn a ddysgwyd ohonynt. Bu adolygiadau mewnol i bob un o'r rhain, ond er mwyn edrych unwaith eto i ddeall hynny, ar gyfer y nifer hwn oedd yn clystyru o fewn y bwrdd iechyd, dylid achub ar y cyfle i adolygu materion nawr a pheidio ag aros am gyfeirbwynt eto. A dyna pam rwyf wedi comisiynu'r adolygiad annibynnol. Dyna pam rwyf wedi bod yn eglur yn fy natganiad a'm cyhoeddiad heddiw, ac rwyf i o'r farn y bydd y cylch gorchwyl yn ddigon eang i'r ddau goleg brenhinol, pe byddent yn credu bod angen edrych ymhellach, oherwydd digwyddodd y clwstwr hwn o achosion dros gyfnod o ddwy flynedd yn fras. Pe bydden nhw'n dymuno edrych yn ôl ymhellach, yna dylai fod ganddyn nhw'r gallu i wneud hynny. Yn sicr nid wyf yn bwriadu pennu amserlen naill ai i atal hynny na chylch gorchwyl i lyffetheirio'n ddiangen yr hyn y bydden nhw'n dymuno ei adolygu ac ymchwilio iddo, ar gyfer rhoi i ni - fel y dywedais wrth roi ateb i Angela Burns, Dawn Bowden a Rhun ap Iorwerth - y math o adolygiad a'r math o adroddiad y bydden nhw'n barod i roi enwau proffesiynol y ddau goleg brenhinol arno, i roi i'r cyhoedd y math o hyder a sicrwydd y byddem i gyd yn ei ddymuno ac, yn gydradd â hynny, i roi argymhellion ar gyfer gwelliant a gweithredu ymhellach, boed hynny yn y bwrdd iechyd hwn neu, yn fwy cyffredinol, ledled y system gofal iechyd gyfan.