English: Thank you, Dawn. I am very familiar with the complexities of some of the grant streams that directly employ staff in local authority areas. Right at the beginning of the pandemic, so a whole year ago now - though it seems both shorter and longer to many of us - grant teams were all advised that they needed to offer flexibility where that was at all possible, for example, by extending deadlines for outcomes to be delivered, or indeed in allowing 'morphing' - I believe the expression is - of various grant streams to allow the most flexibility. There isn't a blanket agreement, however, to hand out that funding with complete flexibility, because sometimes the funding comes from elsewhere to the Welsh Government with funding envelopes attached to it. So, we've provided as much flexibility as is possible from grant streams that we have complete control over and then we've flexed the boundaries of the others where that's been possible. But if you want me to look into a very specific case, I'm very happy to take it up. It's very difficult to give an overall answer, since each grant stream comes with a different set of parameters and controls that need to be looked at. But in general, where at all possible, we have flexed the grants so that authorities can do exactly as you've just said, and it's good practice, of course, which is that as business-as-usual services have had to close down or become much more restricted, those staff can be put to good use in front-line reaction to the pandemic. And I know that that's been happening across local authorities as well. So, I'm more than happy to look into the very specifics for you, but, as I say, in general, we've put as much flexibility into the system as we could manage.
Welsh: Diolch, Dawn. Rwy'n gyfarwydd iawn â chymhlethdodau rhai o'r ffrydiau grant sy'n cyflogi staff yn uniongyrchol mewn ardaloedd awdurdodau lleol. Ar ddechrau'r pandemig, felly flwyddyn gyfan yn ôl bellach - er ei bod yn teimlo'n fyrrach ac yn hirach i lawer ohonom - cynghorwyd yr holl dimau grantiau fod angen iddynt gynnig hyblygrwydd lle bo modd, er enghraifft, drwy ymestyn dyddiadau cau ar gyfer cyflawni canlyniadau, neu'n wir i ganiatáu 'morffio' - credaf mai dyna'r ymadrodd - ffrydiau grant amrywiol i ganiatáu'r hyblygrwydd mwyaf. Fodd bynnag, nid oes cytundeb cyffredinol i ddosbarthu'r cyllid hwnnw gyda hyblygrwydd llwyr, oherwydd weithiau, daw'r cyllid o rywle gwahanol i Lywodraeth Cymru gydag amlenni cyllido ynghlwm wrtho. Felly, rydym wedi darparu cymaint o hyblygrwydd â phosibl drwy'r ffrydiau grant y mae gennym reolaeth gyfan gwbl drostynt, ac yna rydym wedi ystwytho ffiniau'r lleill lle bu modd gwneud hynny. Ond os ydych am imi edrych ar achos penodol iawn, rwy'n fwy na pharod i fynd i'r afael ag ef. Mae'n anodd iawn rhoi ateb cyffredinol, gan fod set wahanol o baramedrau a rheolaethau y mae angen edrych arnynt ym mhob ffrwd grant. Ond yn gyffredinol, lle bo modd, rydym wedi ystwytho'r grantiau fel y gall awdurdodau wneud yn union fel rydych newydd ei ddweud, ac mae'n ymarfer da, wrth gwrs, sef bod modd defnyddio staff yn yr ymateb rheng flaen i'r pandemig wrth i wasanaethau arferol orfod cau neu ddod yn llawer mwy cyfyngedig. A gwn fod hynny wedi bod yn digwydd ar draws awdurdodau lleol hefyd. Felly, rwy'n fwy na pharod i ymchwilio i'r manylion penodol ar eich rhan, ond fel y dywedaf, yn gyffredinol, rydym wedi rhoi cymaint o hyblygrwydd ag y gallwn i mewn i'r system.