English: The figures that we've had in the motion and the figures that I've just given to you now are both correct, because the figure that relates to the £300 million over 10 years is, obviously, a correct figure, as is it the correct figure if the funding had grown in line with the economy. If we had grown in line with public spending over that period, we'd actually have £5 billion or £6 billion more. So, whichever way you cut it, Wales has been shortchanged by the UK Government. And the success, I have to say, of the fiscal framework in securing the needs-based Holtham funding floor was a success for the Welsh Government, and that was hard won by my predecessor, achieved after years of negotiation. So, it's by no means an act of generosity by the UK Government. But, by 2021, the funding floor, as negotiated by Mark Drakeford, will have delivered around £160 million more for Wales, and whilst only a UK Government can truly end austerity, this important difference is a testament, I think, to the Welsh Government's determination to stand up for Wales, and it simply wouldn't have happened without that determination. Contrary to the Welsh Conservatives's motion, the current level of funding per person in Wales, relative to comparable programmes in England, is not simply the result of the fiscal framework. It represents the cumulative effect of the Barnett formula and population movements over many years. The change we have secured through the fiscal framework will ensure that the level of funding that reflects the need in Wales is maintained. Over the past decade, the UK Government's record on investing in Wales on non-devolved responsibilities has been shameful. The motion neglects to mention that the £790 million set aside for growth deals is actually spread over a period of 15 to 20 years. While the UK Government makes promises for tomorrow, it has presided over consistent under-investment on non-devolved issues, such as rail infrastructure and digital connectivity.
Welsh: Mae'r ffigurau a oedd gennym yn y cynnig a'r ffigurau rwyf newydd eu rhoi ichi yn awr yn gywir, gan fod y ffigur sy'n ymwneud â'r £300 miliwn dros 10 mlynedd yn ffigur cywir, wrth gwrs, fel y mae'n ffigur cywir pe bai'r cyllid wedi tyfu yn unol â'r economi. Pe baem wedi tyfu yn unol â gwariant cyhoeddus dros y cyfnod hwnnw, byddai gennym £5 biliwn neu £6 biliwn yn fwy mewn gwirionedd. Felly, pa fodd bynnag yr edrychwch arno, nid yw Cymru wedi cael ei chyfran deg gan Lywodraeth y DU. Ac mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud bod llwyddiant y fframwaith cyllidol i sicrhau cyllid gwaelodol Holtham ar sail anghenion wedi bod yn llwyddiant i Lywodraeth Cymru, ac fe frwydrodd fy rhagflaenydd yn galed am hwnnw, a'i gael ar ôl blynyddoedd o negodi. Felly, nid gweithred o haelioni gan Lywodraeth y DU ydyw o bell ffordd. Ond erbyn 2021, bydd y cyllid gwaelodol, fel y'i negodwyd gan Mark Drakeford, wedi darparu tua £160 miliwn yn fwy i Gymru, ac er mai dim ond Llywodraeth y DU a all roi diwedd go iawn ar gyni, mae'r gwahaniaeth pwysig hwn yn dyst, rwy'n credu, i benderfyniad Llywodraeth Cymru i sefyll dros Gymru, ac ni fyddai wedi digwydd heb y penderfyniad hwnnw. Yn groes i gynnig y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig, nid canlyniad y fframwaith cyllidol yn unig, o'i chymharu â rhaglenni tebyg yn Lloegr, yw'r lefel bresennol o gyllid y pen yng Nghymru. Mae'n cynrychioli effaith gronnol fformiwla Barnett a symudiadau'r boblogaeth dros flynyddoedd lawer. Bydd y newid rydym wedi'i sicrhau drwy'r fframwaith cyllidol yn sicrhau bod lefel y cyllid sy'n adlewyrchu'r angen yng Nghymru yn cael ei chynnal. Dros y degawd diwethaf, mae cyflawniad Llywodraeth y DU o ran buddsoddi yng Nghymru ar gyfrifoldebau heb eu datganoli wedi bod yn gywilyddus. Mae'r cynnig yn anghofio sôn bod yr £790 miliwn a neilltuwyd ar gyfer bargeinion twf wedi'i wasgaru dros gyfnod o 15 i 20 mlynedd mewn gwirionedd. Er bod Llywodraeth y DU yn gwneud addewidion ar gyfer yfory, mae wedi llywyddu dros ddiffyg buddsoddi cyson mewn materion sydd heb eu datganoli, megis seilwaith y rheilffyrdd a chysylltedd digidol.