English: Yes, and I think that's exactly why we have raised concerns at each stage, and I think that's true to say of our concerns for the future, because if it's happening now, how can we put checks and balances in place via this Bill to make sure it doesn't happen in future? So, we will be listening carefully to the Government's response on these amendments, but we are currently minded to also support the amendments tabled by Nick Ramsay and David Melding, to help strengthen the protections available for tenants when social landlords go through major changes. And I've been listening to the debate already today, and I think, actually, have become stronger in my view that we need to put these amendments forward, because these are fundamental reasons, actually, as to how changes happen. If there are financial crises, or if an organisation does have to go into receivership, there's more of a reason, actually, to consult, because it may have a detrimental effect on the tenants and how they may live their lives. So, I think that's something that we need to consider further at this stage and at further stages of the Bill. We've got to recognise also that social landlords have a unique and different relationship with their tenants to that of other landlords, and it's entirely appropriate that tenants are consulted and, crucially, listened to. There is a risk that this Bill may effectively lead to social landlords becoming more like private enterprises - and the deregulation point has been made already - and it may lead to housing associations diversifying how they build their stock, and we really do need to keep a watching brief on that. This is why I think it's important that we have protections in this Bill. I appreciate that there is a piece of work ongoing about tenant regulations and their participation by an independent body, but I think the Government would do well to understand that, when I visited - and I'm sure other Assembly Members have visited - housing associations and talked to their tenants, they want more engagement and more power, and not less engagement and less power. If we can do anything within any of our capacity with regard to legislation to enhance that, then I don't see that as being a negative.
Welsh: Ie, a dyna'n union pam yr ydym ni wedi codi pryderon ym mhob cyfnod, ac rwy'n credu bod hynny'n wir i ddweud ynglŷn â'n pryderon am y dyfodol, oherwydd os yw hynny'n digwydd nawr, sut allwn ni sicrhau drwy gyfrwng y Bil hwn nad yw hynny'n digwydd yn y dyfodol? Felly, byddwn yn gwrando'n ofalus ar ymateb y Llywodraeth i'r gwelliannau hyn, ond rydym ni ar hyn o bryd yn bwriadu hefyd gefnogi'r gwelliannau a gyflwynwyd gan Nick Ramsay a David Melding, i helpu i gryfhau'r amddiffyniad sydd ar gael i denantiaid pan fydd landlordiaid cymdeithasol yn mynd drwy newidiadau mawr. Ac rwyf wedi bod yn gwrando ar y ddadl eisoes heddiw, ac rwy'n credu, mewn gwirionedd, fy mod yn gadarnach fy marn bod angen inni gyflwyno'r gwelliannau hyn, oherwydd mae'r rhain yn rhesymau sylfaenol, mewn gwirionedd, ynghylch sut y mae newidiadau'n digwydd. Os ceir argyfwng ariannol, neu os oes angen i sefydliad fynd i law'r derbynnydd, mae mwy o reswm, mewn gwirionedd, i ymgynghori, oherwydd gallai gael effaith andwyol ar y tenantiaid ac ar sut y maen nhw'n byw eu bywydau. Felly, rwy'n credu bod hynny'n rhywbeth y mae angen inni ei ystyried ymhellach ar hyn o bryd ac yng nghyfnodau eraill y Bil. Mae'n rhaid inni gydnabod hefyd bod gan landlordiaid cymdeithasol berthynas unigryw a gwahanol â'u tenantiaid i landlordiaid eraill, ac mae'n gwbl briodol ymgynghori â thenantiaid ac mae'n hollbwysig gwrando arnynt. Mae perygl y gall y Bil hwn arwain i bob pwrpas at landlordiaid cymdeithasol yn dod yn fwy tebyg i fentrau preifat - a gwnaed y sylw ynghylch dadreoleiddio eisoes - a gall arwain at gymdeithasau tai yn arallgyfeirio sut maen nhw'n adeiladu eu stoc, ac mae gwir angen inni gadw golwg ar hynny. Dyma pam fy mod i'n credu ei bod yn bwysig bod gennym ni fesurau diogelu yn y Bil hwn. Rwy'n sylweddoli bod corff annibynnol wrthi'n cynnal ymarferiad ynghylch rheoliadau tenantiaid a'u cyfranogiad. Ond rwy'n credu y byddai'n dda pe gallai'r Llywodraeth ddeall, pan ymwelais â - ac rwy'n siŵr bod Aelodau Cynulliad eraill wedi ymweld â - chymdeithasau tai a siarad â'u tenantiaid, mae arnyn nhw eisiau mwy o gysylltiad a mwy o rym, ac nid llai o gysylltiad a llai o rym. Os gallwn wneud unrhyw beth o fewn ein gallu o ran deddfwriaeth i wella hynny, yna nid wyf yn gweld hynny yn rhywbeth negyddol.