techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you, Counsel General, for that answer. Following the horrendous deaths of 39 Vietnamese migrants in Essex last month, a number of senior MPs and experts have cautioned that the UK faces a real risk of being excluded from Europol and its agencies, including the anti-trafficking unit and the European Migrant Smuggling Centre, post Brexit. They went on to say that, even with a deal, the UK would have downgraded access to those organisations. The UK's right to access and share information on a whole host of security issues like human trafficking and international crime could be severely hampered at a time when international co-operation is needed the most. Being excluded from an organisation that has an unrivalled ability to track crimes across Europe and beyond is of grave concern. So, Minister, what discussions have you had with the Westminster Government - or will you have when it returns - about how they intend to maintain access to all those agencies that I've just mentioned, especially now, when we're in such turbulent times internationally?
Welsh: Diolch am eich ateb, Gwnsler Cyffredinol. Yn dilyn marwolaethau erchyll 39 o fudwyr o Fiet-nam yn Essex y mis diwethaf, mae nifer o uwch ASau ac arbenigwyr wedi rhybuddio bod y DU yn wynebu risg wirioneddol o gael ei heithrio o Europol a'u hasiantaethau, gan gynnwys yr uned atal masnachu pobl a Chanolfan Smyglo Mudwyr Ewrop, ar ôl Brexit. Aethant yn eu blaenau i ddweud y byddai mynediad y DU at y sefydliadau hynny, hyd yn oed gyda chytundeb, yn cael ei israddio. Gallai hawl y DU i gyrchu a rhannu gwybodaeth am lu o faterion diogelwch fel masnachu pobl a throseddau rhyngwladol gael ei llesteirio'n ddifrifol ar adeg pan fo mwy o angen nag erioed am gydweithredu rhyngwladol. Mae cael eich eithrio o sefydliad sydd â gallu dihafal i olrhain troseddau ledled Ewrop a thu hwnt yn achos pryder mawr. Felly, Weinidog, pa drafodaethau a gawsoch gyda Llywodraeth San Steffan - neu y byddwch yn eu cael ar ôl iddi ddychwelyd - ynglŷn â sut y bwriadant gynnal mynediad at yr holl asiantaethau rwyf newydd eu crybwyll, yn enwedig nawr, a ninnau mewn cyfnod mor gythryblus yn rhyngwladol?
English: Whilst we believe the best way to safeguard the Welsh economy is to remain in the European Union, the Welsh Government is doing everything in our power to safeguard the Welsh economy. This includes using measures such as our Brexit resilience fund, where we announced an additional £6 million funding for this week.
Welsh: Er ein bod yn credu mai'r ffordd orau o ddiogelu economi Cymru yw aros yn yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn gwneud popeth yn ein gallu i ddiogelu economi Cymru. Mae hyn yn cynnwys defnyddio mesurau fel ein cronfa cydnerthedd Brexit, y cyhoeddasom gyllid ychwanegol o £6 miliwn ar ei chyfer yr wythnos hon.
English: Counsel General, a lot of the economic activity in Wales consists of the work of small and medium-sized enterprises, and I believe they're crucial to our economy. They face a lot of cash-flow and confidence pressures in the light of Brexit and what Brexit may bring. I believe a crucial support for them is the Development Bank of Wales, so, could you offer some reassurance today that that development bank is best placed to offer that support, crucial support, to our SMEs before and post Brexit?
Welsh: Gwnsler Cyffredinol, gwaith busnesau bach a chanolig eu maint yw llawer o'r gweithgarwch economaidd yng Nghymru, a chredaf eu bod yn hanfodol i'n heconomi. Maent yn wynebu llawer o bwysau o ran llif arian a hyder oherwydd Brexit a'r hyn a allai ddigwydd yn sgil Brexit. Credaf y gall Banc Datblygu Cymru ddarparu cymorth hanfodol iddynt, felly a allech roi sicrwydd i ni heddiw fod y banc datblygu yn y sefyllfa orau i gynnig y cymorth hanfodol hwnnw i'n busnesau bach a chanolig cyn ac ar ôl Brexit?
English: Well, the withdrawal agreement fails to provide any guarantees that the UK Government is committed to retaining alignment with existing EU rights and protections for workers in Wales.
Welsh: Wel, nid yw'r cytundeb ymadael yn darparu unrhyw warantau fod Llywodraeth y DU wedi ymrwymo i barhau i gydymffurfio â hawliau ac amddiffyniadau presennol yr UE i weithwyr yng Nghymru.
English: Thank you for that very clear answer, Minister. It is absolutely clear that the latest withdrawal agreement represents a further weakening of the UK Government's commitment to workers' rights. Frances O'Grady, secretary of the Trades Union Congress, has said: 'This deal would be a disaster for working people. It would hammer the economy, cost jobs and sell workers' rights down the river.' Do you agree with Sir Keir Starmer, the UK shadow Brexit Secretary, that there would be a real danger if this deal goes through that there would be a serious weakening of workers' rights and that it would be very likely that the UK would follow other models, such as the United States', which have considerably weaker protections for workers than we currently enjoy here in this country?
Welsh: Diolch am eich ateb clir iawn, Weinidog. Mae'n gwbl amlwg fod y cytundeb ymadael diweddaraf yn arwydd o wanychu pellach ar ymrwymiad Llywodraeth y DU tuag at hawliau gweithwyr. Mae Frances O'Grady, ysgrifennydd Cyngres yr Undebau Llafur, wedi dweud: Byddai'r cytundeb hwn yn drychineb i weithwyr. Byddai'n ergyd i'r economi, yn arwain at golli swyddi ac yn troi cefn ar hawliau gweithwyr. A ydych yn cytuno â Syr Keir Starmer, Ysgrifennydd Brexit yr wrthblaid ar gyfer y DU, y byddai perygl gwirioneddol, pe bai'r cytundeb hwn yn cael ei dderbyn, y byddai hawliau gweithwyr yn cael eu gwanychu'n sylweddol ac y byddai'n debygol iawn y byddai'r DU yn dilyn modelau eraill, fel un yr Unol Daleithiau, sy'n cynnwys amddiffyniadau gwannach o lawer i weithwyr na'r rhai sydd gennym yn y wlad hon ar hyn o bryd?
English: Well, I think the Member hits the nail on the head. That is exactly, I think, the risk that comes out of this agreement. In fact, I'd go further than to say that it's a risk; I think the nature of the agreement discloses the kind of destination in which the current UK Government wants to take the UK. It's one of deregulation, where the UK has given up on workplace protection and social and environmental rights of the kind that we in Wales both take for granted and would wish of course to continue to align with. As her question implies, this deal is even worse than Theresa May's deal, which at least committed the Government to maintaining the current level of EU workers' rights and gave Parliament some mechanism into the future around that. The kind of vision that is outlined in this agreement is fundamentally at odds with the priorities of the Welsh Government here in Wales, as set out in the work of the Fair Work Commission recently, which ensures that we as a Government will continue to take every step that we can to make sure that workers in Wales are not disadvantaged if and when we leave the European Union.
Welsh: Wel, credaf fod yr Aelod yn taro'r hoelen ar ei phen. Credaf mai dyna'n union yw'r risg yn sgil y cytundeb hwn. Mewn gwirionedd, buaswn yn mynd gam ymhellach na'i alw'n risg; credaf fod natur y cytundeb yn datgelu'r math o ben draw y mae Llywodraeth bresennol y DU yn awyddus i fynd â'r DU iddo. Mae'n un o ddadreoleiddio, lle mae'r DU wedi rhoi'r gorau i amddiffyniad yn y gweithle a hawliau cymdeithasol ac amgylcheddol o'r math rydym ni yng Nghymru yn eu cymryd yn ganiataol ac yr hoffem barhau i gydymffurfio â hwy wrth gwrs. Fel yr awgryma ei chwestiwn, mae'r cytundeb hwn hyd yn oed yn waeth na chytundeb Theresa May, a oedd o leiaf yn ymrwymo'r Llywodraeth i gynnal hawliau gweithwyr yr UE ar eu lefel bresennol ac a oedd yn rhoi rhywfaint o fecanwaith i Senedd y DU yn y dyfodol mewn perthynas â hynny. Mae'r math o weledigaeth a amlinellir yn y cytundeb hwn yn gwbl groes i flaenoriaethau Llywodraeth Cymru yma yng Nghymru fel y'u nodwyd yng ngwaith y Comisiwn Gwaith Teg yn ddiweddar, sy'n sicrhau y byddwn ni fel Llywodraeth yn parhau i wneud popeth y gallwn i sicrhau nad yw gweithwyr yng Nghymru dan anfantais os a phan fyddwn yn gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd.
English: Item 3 on the agenda this afternoon is a debate under Standing Order 25.15 on the Government of Wales Act 2006 (Amendment) Order 2019 - section 109 Order relating to the electoral registration officers. I call on the Counsel General and the Brexit Minister to move the motion - Jeremy Miles.
Welsh: Eitem 3 ar yr agenda y prynhawn yma yw dadl o dan Reol Sefydlog 25.15 ar Orchymyn Deddf Llywodraeth Cymru 2006 (Diwygio) 2019 - Gorchymyn adran 109 yn ymwneud â swyddogion cofrestru etholiadol. Galwaf ar y Cwnsler Cyffredinol a'r Gweinidog Brexit i gynnig y cynnig - Jeremy Miles.
English: Thank you. Can I call Carwyn Jones to speak on behalf of the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee? Carwyn.
Welsh: Diolch. A gaf fi alw ar Carwyn Jones i siarad ar ran y Pwyllgor Materion Cyfansoddiadol a Deddfwriaethol? Carwyn.
English: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. The Business Committee referred the Government of Wales Act 2006 (Amendment) Order 2019 to the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee in accordance with Standing Order 25.7 (i). We took evidence from the Counsel General on the proposed Order at our meeting on 16 September 2019, and we laid our report before the Assembly on 30 September of this year. Since then, we note that the Order was approved by the House of Commons and the House of Lords on 28 October of this year. Dirprwy Lywydd, during our evidence session, the Counsel General explained the purpose and objective for the proposed Order, as well as the relationship between the Order, the Senedd and Elections (Wales) Bill and the Welsh Government's forthcoming local government Bill. We've noted the background and purpose for the proposed Order and, Dirprwy Lywydd, we are content.
Welsh: Diolch, Ddirprwy Lywydd. Cyfeiriodd y Pwyllgor Busnes Orchymyn Deddf Llywodraeth Cymru 2006 (Diwygio) 2019 at y Pwyllgor Materion Cyfansoddiadol a Deddfwriaethol yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 25.7 (i). Cawsom dystiolaeth gan y Cwnsler Cyffredinol ar y Gorchymyn arfaethedig yn ein cyfarfod ar 16 Medi 2019, a chyflwynasom ein hadroddiad i'r Cynulliad ar 30 Medi eleni. Ers hynny, nodwn fod y Gorchymyn wedi'i gymeradwyo gan Dŷ'r Cyffredin a Thŷ'r Arglwyddi ar 28 Hydref eleni. Ddirprwy Lywydd, yn ystod ein sesiwn dystiolaeth, esboniodd y Cwnsler Cyffredinol ddiben ac amcan y Gorchymyn arfaethedig, yn ogystal â'r berthynas rhwng y Gorchymyn, Bil Senedd ac Etholiadau (Cymru) a Bil llywodraeth leol Llywodraeth Cymru sydd ar y ffordd. Rydym wedi nodi cefndir a diben y Gorchymyn arfaethedig, ac rydym yn fodlon, Ddirprwy Lywydd.
English: Thank you. I call on the Counsel General and Brexit Minister to reply.
Welsh: Diolch. Galwaf ar y Cwnsler Cyffredinol a'r Gweinidog Brexit i ymateb.
English: I thank Carwyn Jones for his remarks and for the work of CLAC in relation to this Order. If the Assembly approves the Order, it will be considered next by the Privy Council at its next meeting. I expect the date for that meeting to be confirmed following the UK general election. And, in closing, can I put on record my thanks to officials in both the Welsh Government and the UK Government for enabling this legislation to be brought forward rapidly?
Welsh: Diolch i Carwyn Jones am ei sylwadau ac am waith y Pwyllgor Materion Cyfansoddiadol a Deddfwriaethol mewn perthynas â'r Gorchymyn hwn. Os bydd y Cynulliad yn cymeradwyo'r Gorchymyn, bydd y Cyfrin Gyngor yn ei ystyried yn ei gyfarfod nesaf. Rwy'n disgwyl i'r dyddiad ar gyfer y cyfarfod hwnnw gael ei gadarnhau yn dilyn etholiad cyffredinol y DU. Ac i gloi, a gaf fi gofnodi fy niolch i swyddogion yn Llywodraeth Cymru a Llywodraeth y DU am ei gwneud hi'n bosibl dwyn y ddeddfwriaeth hon gerbron yn gyflym?
English: Thank you. The proposal is to agree the motion. Does any Member object? No. Therefore, the motion is agreed in accordance with Standing Order 12.36.
Welsh: Diolch. Y cynnig yw derbyn y cynnig. A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? Na. Felly, derbynnir y cynnig yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 12.36.
English: We now move to topical questions, and the first this afternoon, to be answered by the Minister for Health and Social Services, is from Jack Sargeant.
Welsh: Symudwn yn awr at y cwestiynau amserol, a daw'r cyntaf y prynhawn yma, a fydd yn cael ei ateb gan y Gweinidog Iechyd a Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol, gan Jack Sargeant.
English: Thank you for the question. The use of Orkambi a Symkevi in NHS England is approved only through a commercial access agreement. My officials have met with, and await a formal offer from, Vertex. Given the confidential nature of our discussions, there is, of course, a limit to the comment that I can make.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiwn. Nid yw GIG Lloegr ond wedi cymeradwyo defnyddio Orkambi a Symkevi drwy gytundeb mynediad masnachol. Mae fy swyddogion wedi cyfarfod â Vertex ac maent yn aros am gynnig ffurfiol ganddynt. O ystyried natur gyfrinachol ein trafodaethau, mae yna derfyn i'r sylwadau y gallaf eu gwneud wrth gwrs.
English: Thank you for that, Minister. As you are aware, I have constituents who are now travelling across the border to Liverpool and Manchester for treatment. They will be in the same building as England patients who can access this medicine. Minister, can you assure me that negotiations in the conversations you are having with Vertex are ongoing and are positive so that my constituents and the people of Wales can access these medicines as soon as possible? And, finally, Minister, have you also given any consideration to introducing an interim patient access scheme, as was the case in NHS Scotland, while the agreement was being reached on access to these two very important medicines?
Welsh: Diolch i chi am hynny, Weinidog. Fel y gwyddoch, mae gennyf etholwyr sy'n gorfod teithio dros y ffin i Lerpwl a Manceinion i gael triniaeth. Byddant yn yr un adeilad â chleifion o Loegr sy'n gallu cael mynediad at y feddyginiaeth hon. Weinidog, a allwch fy sicrhau bod y negodiadau yn y sgyrsiau rydych yn eu cael gyda Vertex yn parhau a'u bod yn gadarnhaol fel y gall fy etholwyr a phobl Cymru gael mynediad at y meddyginiaethau hyn cyn gynted â phosibl? Ac yn olaf, Weinidog, a ydych chi hefyd wedi ystyried cyflwyno cynllun dros dro ar gyfer mynediad i gleifion, fel y digwyddodd yn GIG yr Alban, wrth ddod i gytundeb ynghylch mynediad at y meddyginiaethau pwysig hyn?
English: The Member will be aware of the letter published by Simon Stevens, the chief executive of NHS England on this matter, sent to the House of Commons's Health and Social Care Select Committee. That set out that Northern Ireland and Wales have stood alongside England in the negotiation of the agreement that has been reached. My expectation is that those terms will be honoured. I made public comment yesterday that I would sign up today to exactly the same pro-rata terms for Wales, and I wish to be able to do so. That is my commitment. There should not be a delay for any family in Wales. I look forward to a properly constructive and honest response from Vertex that allows that to take place.
Welsh: Bydd yr Aelod yn ymwybodol o'r llythyr a gyhoeddwyd gan Simon Stevens, prif weithredwr GIG Lloegr ar y mater hwn, a anfonwyd at Bwyllgor Dethol Iechyd a Gofal Cymdeithasol Tŷ'r Cyffredin. Roedd hwnnw'n nodi bod Gogledd Iwerddon a Chymru wedi sefyll ochr yn ochr â Lloegr wrth negodi'r cytundeb a wnaed. Rwy'n disgwyl y bydd y telerau hynny'n cael eu hanrhydeddu. Gwneuthum sylw cyhoeddus ddoe y byddwn yn ymrwymo heddiw i'r un telerau pro rata yn union ar gyfer Cymru, a hoffwn allu gwneud hynny. Dyna fy ymrwymiad. Ni ddylai unrhyw deulu wynebu oedi yng Nghymru. Edrychaf ymlaen at ymateb priodol o onest ac adeiladol gan Vertex a fydd yn caniatáu i hynny ddigwydd.
English: Minister, I know that you share with me concerns that, every day that passes, we have patients in Wales who aren't able to access these extremely important drugs. Now, on 25 October, you said that you and your officials were meeting with representatives from Vertex the following week to discuss details of these terms and how they might be applied. I do understand you've got company confidentiality issues here, but are you able to give us any form of update on that? May I also ask what lessons have been learned from the length of time that it's taken to make progress on this issue, and how could things be done differently in future to ensure that we're not left behind the curve when it comes to reaching agreements on making life-saving drugs available for Welsh patients? And finally, in terms of learning lessons, I understand that in early 2018, the company had been in discussions with NHS Wales on a portfolio proposal for all their current and future cystic fibrosis medicines. However, and I'm directly quoting, these discussions were halted in March/April, due to what we understood at the time to be a staffing issue at NHS Wales all-Wales medicines procurement. Minister, can you shed any light on that and provide assurances that such hold-ups will not happen again?
Welsh: Weinidog, gwn eich bod yn rhannu fy mhryderon fod gennym, gyda phob dydd sy'n mynd heibio, gleifion yng Nghymru nad ydynt yn gallu cael mynediad at y meddyginiaethau hynod bwysig hyn. Nawr, ar 25 Hydref, fe ddywedoch eich bod chi a'ch swyddogion yn cyfarfod â chynrychiolwyr o Vertex yr wythnos ganlynol i drafod manylion y telerau hyn a sut y gellid eu cymhwyso. Rwy'n deall bod gennych faterion yn ymwneud â chyfrinachedd cwmnïau yma, ond a allwch chi roi unrhyw fath o ddiweddariad i ni ar hynny? A gaf fi ofyn hefyd pa wersi a ddysgwyd o'r amser a gymerwyd i wneud cynnydd ar y mater hwn, a sut y gellid gwneud pethau'n wahanol yn y dyfodol i sicrhau na chawn ein gadael ar ôl pan fo angen dod i gytundeb i sicrhau bod cyffuriau sy'n achub bywydau ar gael i gleifion Cymru? Ac yn olaf, o ran dysgu gwersi, deallaf fod y cwmni, ar ddechrau 2018, wedi bod mewn trafodaethau gyda GIG Cymru ar gynnig portffolio ar gyfer eu holl feddyginiaethau ffeibrosis systig presennol ac yn y dyfodol. Fodd bynnag, ac rwy'n dyfynnu'n uniongyrchol, daeth y trafodaethau hyn i stop ym mis Mawrth/Ebrill, oherwydd yr hyn y deallem ar y pryd a oedd yn fater staffio ym mhroses gaffael meddyginiaethau Cymru gyfan GIG Cymru. Weinidog, a allwch chi daflu unrhyw oleuni ar hynny a rhoi sicrwydd i ni na fydd y fath oedi'n digwydd eto?
English: On your final point, that simply isn't true. It's simply not true. Vertex understand very well the well-established appraisal mechanisms we have right across the United Kingdom for new medicines: the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence appraisal system that we sign up to, the particular appraisal systems also available in Scotland, and here in Wales through the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group. What they have done, in reaching an agreement with England, which is in the text of Simon Stevens's letter, is they've agreed to provide real-time patient data on a basis where they've agreed a price for access to be made available for every patient for whom the treatment and the condition are indicated, and they will then submit their whole portfolio, with that real-time data, to NICE for appraisal. Now that makes sense, and that was not the proposal that was ever provided here in Wales. I am clear that we are not responsible in Wales for holding up access to these medicines. The issue is that Vertex need to do what they've committed to do, which is in Simon Stevens's letter. And that is the start and the end of the matter. No family in Wales should be put into a less advantageous position than a family across our border because of an inability to meet the terms of the deal that has been agreed. I look forward to a positive and constructive response from the pharmaceutical company.
Welsh: Ar eich pwynt olaf, nid yw'n wir o gwbl. Nid yw'n wir o gwbl. Mae Vertex yn deall y mecanweithiau gwerthuso sefydledig sydd gennym ar gyfer meddyginiaethau newydd ar draws y Deyrnas Unedig yn iawn: system arfarnu'r Sefydliad Cenedlaethol dros Ragoriaeth mewn Iechyd a Gofal rydym wedi ymrwymo iddi, y systemau arfarnu penodol sydd hefyd ar gael yn yr Alban, ac yma yng Nghymru drwy Grŵp Strategaeth Meddyginiaethau Cymru Gyfan. Yr hyn y maent wedi'i wneud, wrth ddod i gytundeb â Lloegr, sydd wedi'i gynnwys yn llythyr Simon Stevens, yw cytuno i ddarparu data cleifion amser real ar sail lle maent wedi cytuno ar bris i sicrhau bod mynediad ar gael i bob claf sy'n dioddef o'r cyflwr ac sydd angen y driniaeth, ac yna byddant yn cyflwyno eu portffolio cyfan, gyda'r data amser real hwnnw, i'r Sefydliad Cenedlaethol dros Ragoriaeth mewn Iechyd a Gofal i'w arfarnu. Nawr, mae hynny'n gwneud synnwyr, ac nid dyna'r cynnig a roddwyd yma yng Nghymru. Rwy'n glir nad ydym ni yng Nghymru yn gyfrifol am oedi mynediad at y meddyginiaethau hyn. Y broblem yw bod angen i Vertex wneud yr hyn y maent wedi ymrwymo i'w wneud, sef yr hyn sydd yn llythyr Simon Stevens. A dyna ddechrau a diwedd y mater. Ni ddylai'r un teulu yng Nghymru gael ei roi mewn sefyllfa lai manteisiol na theulu dros y ffin oherwydd anallu i fodloni telerau'r cytundeb y cytunwyd arno. Edrychaf ymlaen at ymateb cadarnhaol ac adeiladol gan y cwmni fferyllol.
English: These patients were always reported on an internal list within the health board, and their waiting times were monitored. They are now being reported on the correct referral-to-treatment or diagnostic list. Robust mechanisms are now in place to ensure the health board reports all patients correctly.
Welsh: Roedd y cleifion hyn bob amser wedi eu cofnodi ar restr fewnol o fewn y bwrdd iechyd, ac roedd eu hamseroedd aros yn cael eu monitro. Cânt eu cofnodi nawr ar y rhestr aros rhwng atgyfeirio a thriniaeth neu'r rhestr ddiagnostig gywir. Mae mecanweithiau cadarn yn eu lle nawr i sicrhau bod y bwrdd iechyd yn adrodd am bob claf yn gywir.
English: This might seem like a trivial issue about a data entry error, but behind it lies consistent poor performance of even basic administrative functions. Without proper and accurate data on waiting times, we can't judge whether or not things are getting better or worse. We can't pinpoint the areas that need investment and the areas where patient safety may be at risk because of lengthening waiting times, yet poor quality of data throughout the NHS is an issue highlighted time and time again by committee report after committee report. So, how confident are you that the decisions that you make, when the data that you have shows itself to be consistently unreliable, are the right decisions?
Welsh: Efallai fod hwn i'w weld yn fater dibwys ynglŷn â gwall cofnodi data, ond y tu ôl iddo, roedd hyd yn oed swyddogaethau gweinyddol sylfaenol yn cael eu perfformio'n wael yn gyson. Heb ddata cywir ar amseroedd aros, ni allwn farnu a yw pethau'n gwella neu'n gwaethygu. Ni allwn nodi'n fanwl y meysydd y mae angen buddsoddi ynddynt a'r meysydd lle gallai diogelwch cleifion fod mewn perygl oherwydd amseroedd aros hwy, ac eto mae ansawdd gwael y data ledled y GIG yn fater sydd wedi cael sylw dro ar ôl tro gan un adroddiad pwyllgor ar ôl y llall. Felly, pa mor hyderus ydych chi fod y penderfyniadau a wnewch, pan fo'r data sydd gennych yn gyson annibynadwy, yn benderfyniadau cywir?
English: I don't accept the premise of the Member's question that the data is consistently unreliable. We're open and we're honest about the accuracy that we have in our official statistics. Those official statistics do, of course, help to inform the choices that we make and the scrutiny we have on our services. I think a blanket attack that says, 'You can't rely on data provided by the NHS' is misplaced and it's not the way that I intend to run the health service.
Welsh: Nid wyf yn derbyn cynsail cwestiwn yr Aelod fod y data yn gyson annibynadwy. Rydym yn agored ac yn onest ynglŷn â'r cywirdeb sydd gennym yn ein hystadegau swyddogol. Mae'r ystadegau swyddogol hynny, wrth gwrs, yn helpu i lywio'r dewisiadau a wnawn a'r gwaith craffu sydd gennym ar ein gwasanaethau. Rwy'n credu bod ymosodiad cyffredinol sy'n dweud, 'Ni allwch ddibynnu ar ddata a ddarperir gan y GIG' yn gyfeiliornus ac nid dyna'r ffordd rwy'n bwriadu rhedeg y gwasanaeth iechyd.