techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I'm demonstrating to Mark Isherwood that we are not a post box for consequential funding from the UK Government. The consequential funding comes in a block of funding that we are then able to allocate as per the needs here in Wales. Now, the funding that we allocated to hospices here in Wales was on the basis that we had discussions with the hospice sector to understand the financial need that they identified, and the pot of funding was allocated accordingly. And those are the discussions that my colleague the health Minister's department were having with the hospice sector here in Wales. And, of course, our hospice sector here in Wales is smaller than the sector across the border. So, it's not the case that every penny of consequential funding we receive goes to exactly the same spending area. Now, if it is the case that hospices are telling you that the funding that they receive isn't meeting the needs, then obviously we would want to have those discussions with the hospice sector, and I'm sure that my colleague the health Minister will pick that up with the sector, to understand their needs for the next financial year. But, as I say, the funding package that we did put in place for the sector was done so in discussion and consultation with the sector.
Welsh: Rwy'n dangos i Mark Isherwood nad blwch postio ar gyfer cyllid canlyniadol gan Lywodraeth y DU ydym ni. Daw'r cyllid canlyniadol mewn bloc o gyllid y gallwn ei ddyrannu wedyn yn unol â'r anghenion yma yng Nghymru. Nawr, dyrannwyd cyllid gennym i hosbisau yma yng Nghymru ar sail trafodaethau a gawsom gyda'r sector hosbisau i ddeall yr angen ariannol a nodwyd ganddynt, a dyrannwyd y pot o arian yn unol â hynny. A dyna'r trafodaethau a gafodd adran fy nghyd-Aelod y Gweinidog iechyd gyda'r sector hosbis yma yng Nghymru. Ac wrth gwrs, mae ein sector hosbisau yma yng Nghymru yn llai na'r sector dros y ffin. Felly, nid yw'n wir fod pob ceiniog o gyllid canlyniadol a gawn yn mynd i'r un maes gwariant yn union. Nawr, os yw'r hosbisau'n dweud wrthych nad yw'r cyllid y maent yn ei dderbyn yn diwallu eu hanghenion, yna yn amlwg, byddem yn awyddus i gael y trafodaethau hynny gyda'r sector hosbisau, ac rwy'n siŵr y bydd fy nghyd-Aelod y Gweinidog iechyd yn trafod hynny gyda'r sector er mwyn deall eu hanghenion ar gyfer y flwyddyn ariannol nesaf. Ond fel y dywedaf, rhoddwyd pecyn cyllido ar waith gennym ar gyfer y sector drwy drafod ac ymgynghori â'r sector.
English: Yes. The land transaction tax temporary reduction period has been extended to 30 June to help those taxpayers who may have encountered delays in completing their home purchases before 1 April. From 1 July, the standard rates of land transaction tax will apply.
Welsh: Gwnaf. Mae'r gostyngiad dros dro yn y dreth trafodiadau tir wedi'i ymestyn i 30 Mehefin i gynorthwyo trethdalwyr a allai fod wedi wynebu oedi wrth gwblhau pryniant eu cartrefi cyn 1 Ebrill. O 1 Gorffennaf, bydd cyfraddau safonol y dreth trafodiadau tir yn weithredol.
English: I refer to phasing out, but, unlike what the UK Government is doing in England and Northern Ireland, we don't have any taper in Wales. Why has the Minister made that decision, and why does she consider it right that people buying houses between £180,000 and £250,000 in Wales should pay 3.5 per cent on that part of the transaction, when those same purchases would be nil rated in England or Northern Ireland?
Welsh: Cyfeiriaf at ddiddymu'n raddol, ond yn wahanol i'r hyn y mae Llywodraeth y DU yn ei wneud yn Lloegr a Gogledd Iwerddon, nid oes gennym dapr yng Nghymru. Pam fod y Gweinidog wedi gwneud y penderfyniad hwnnw, a pham ei bod yn meddwl ei bod yn iawn y dylai pobl sy'n prynu tai gwerth rhwng £180,000 a £250,000 yng Nghymru dalu 3.5 y cant ar y rhan honno o'r trafodiad, pan fyddai'r un pryniannau ar gyfradd sero yn Lloegr neu Ogledd Iwerddon?
English: Well, we have a different housing market here in Wales, and we've shown that, actually, in terms of transactions and revenues from land transaction tax, the market is much more buoyant here than it is across the border. The increase in the zero-rate band for those paying the main residential rates to £250,000 from £180,000 will, as I say, come to an end in July. But, even then, we will still have the most generous and progressive form of support for house buyers, which isn't, of course, limited to first-time house buyers here in Wales either. We took those decisions because the housing market is different here in Wales, and we've reflected that within the decisions that we've taken. House prices in England are very different, so that means, on average, the benefit can be up to, or increasing up to or above £12,000, whereas here the maximum is £2,500. So, I think that the kind of scale of the challenge in terms of house prices is very different.
Welsh: Wel, mae gennym farchnad dai wahanol yma yng Nghymru, ac rydym wedi dangos, o ran trafodiadau a refeniw o'r dreth trafodiadau tir, fod y farchnad yn llawer mwy bywiog yma nag y mae dros y ffin. Fel y dywedaf, bydd y cynnydd yn y band cyfradd sero ar gyfer y rheini sy'n talu'r prif gyfraddau preswyl rhwng £180,000 a £250,000 yn dod i ben ym mis Gorffennaf. Ond hyd yn oed wedyn, bydd gennym y ffurf fwyaf hael a blaengar ar gymorth i brynwyr tai, nad yw, wrth gwrs, wedi'i gyfyngu i brynwyr tro cyntaf yma yng Nghymru chwaith. Gwnaethom y penderfyniadau hynny am fod y farchnad dai'n wahanol yma yng Nghymru, ac rydym wedi adlewyrchu hynny yn y penderfyniadau rydym wedi'u gwneud. Mae prisiau tai yn Lloegr yn wahanol iawn, felly golyga hynny, ar gyfartaledd, y gall y budd fod hyd at, neu gynyddu hyd at neu'n uwch na £12,000, ond yma, yr uchafswm yw £2,500. Felly, credaf fod graddau'r her o ran prisiau tai yn wahanol iawn.
English: Thanks for that answer, Minister. I think Mark Reckless has raised a very good point in terms of how we get the housing market going in Wales. I hear what you're saying about the housing market being different here from across the border, but nonetheless it still needs that stimulus that the UK Government are seeking to do by applying the nil rate band until the end of 2021. Can I ask you, Minister, that you look at this again and keep it under review and act on the evidence? Because I am concerned that, certainly in some parts of Wales, this policy may have more of a negative impact than in others, and I do think that there is a case for extending relief as long as possible until the economy gets back on its feet.
Welsh: Diolch am eich ateb, Weinidog. Credaf fod Mark Reckless wedi codi pwynt da iawn o ran sut rydym yn bywiogi'r farchnad dai yng Nghymru. Clywaf yr hyn a ddywedwch ynglŷn â'r ffaith bod y farchnad dai yn wahanol yma i'r ochr draw i'r ffin, ond serch hynny, mae arni angen yr ysgogiad y mae Llywodraeth y DU yn ceisio'i sicrhau drwy gymhwyso'r band cyfradd sero tan ddiwedd 2021. Weinidog, a gaf fi ofyn i chi edrych eto ar hyn a'i gadw dan arolwg a gweithredu'n unol â'r dystiolaeth? Oherwydd mewn rhai rhannau o Gymru yn sicr, rwy'n pryderu y gallai'r polisi hwn gael effaith fwy negyddol nag mewn rhannau eraill, a chredaf fod achos i'w wneud dros ymestyn y rhyddhad tan y bydd yr economi mewn gwell cyflwr.
English: Well, all of these rates and bands across the Welsh taxes are kept constantly under review. The extension of the LTT reduction is expected to benefit around 4,000 additional homebuyers here in Wales, and up to and including January, around 10,000 homebuyers have already benefited from the temporary reduction that I announced last year. So, a significant number of households have already benefited from it, and actually only around a quarter of house buyers at the moment are actually paying any land transaction tax as a result of the decisions taken last year in this respect. But, as I say, when the normal - if you like - rates do return, we will still have a relatively generous situation here in Wales.
Welsh: Wel, mae'r holl gyfraddau a'r bandiau hyn yn nhrethi Cymru yn cael eu hadolygu'n gyson. Disgwylir i'r estyniad i'r gostyngiad yn y dreth trafodiadau tir fod o fudd i oddeutu 4,000 yn ychwanegol o brynwyr cartrefi yma yng Nghymru, a hyd at a chan gynnwys mis Ionawr, mae oddeutu 10,000 o brynwyr cartrefi eisoes wedi elwa o'r gostyngiad dros dro a gyhoeddais y llynedd. Felly, mae nifer sylweddol o aelwydydd eisoes wedi elwa ohono, a dim ond oddeutu chwarter yr holl brynwyr tai ar hyn o bryd sy'n talu unrhyw dreth trafodiadau tir o ganlyniad i'r penderfyniadau a wnaed y llynedd ar hyn. Ond fel rwy'n dweud, pan fydd y cyfraddau arferol - os mynnwch - yn dychwelyd, bydd gennym sefyllfa gymharol hael yma yng Nghymru o hyd.
English: Over £14 million has been allocated to 870 businesses within the financial and professional service sectors from the economic resilience fund during 2020-21. We are also investing £270 million in the Development Bank of Wales to support businesses, and will continue to work with all sectors to consider what support is needed into 2021-22.
Welsh: Mae dros £14 miliwn wedi'i ddyrannu i 870 o fusnesau yn y sectorau cyllid a gwasanaethau proffesiynol o'r gronfa cadernid economaidd yn 2020-21. Rydym hefyd yn buddsoddi £270 miliwn ym Manc Datblygu Cymru i gefnogi busnesau, a byddwn yn parhau i weithio gyda phob sector i ystyried pa gymorth sydd ei angen yn 2021-22.
English: Well, Purple Shoots is a charity that helps people in Wales who can't otherwise access the affordable finance they need to start a business. They also work with self-reliant groups, creating opportunities for people furthest from employment or work. They're supporting or have supported many hundreds of small businesses right across Wales. However, they advise that although just £2 million of the hundreds of millions provided to the Development Bank of Wales would keep them lending for six years and create more than 1,500 jobs and 1,300 businesses, that funding excludes completely the client group they work with. What, if any, plans do you therefore have to make funds available for these brave, budding entrepreneurs, otherwise trapped at the starting line, where, as Purple Shoots say, 'It is so frustrating because we've seen such incredible courage, resilience and entrepreneurial thinking amongst our clients; they've kept going in the face of incredible hardship, many with no help at all, apart from the repayment holiday'?
Welsh: Wel, mae Purple Shoots yn elusen sy'n rhoi cymorth i bobl yng Nghymru na allant gael gafael ar gyllid fforddiadwy sydd ei angen arnynt i ddechrau busnes. Maent hefyd yn gweithio gyda grwpiau hunanddibynnol, gan greu cyfleoedd i'r bobl sydd bellaf o gyflogaeth neu waith. Maent yn cefnogi neu wedi cefnogi cannoedd o fusnesau bach ledled Cymru. Fodd bynnag, er y byddai dim ond £2 filiwn o'r cannoedd o filiynau a ddarparwyd i Fanc Datblygu Cymru yn golygu y gallent barhau i fenthyca am chwe blynedd a chreu mwy na 1,500 o swyddi a 1,300 o fusnesau, maent yn dweud bod y cyllid hwnnw'n cau'r grŵp cleientiaid y maent yn gweithio gydag ef allan yn gyfan gwbl. Pa gynlluniau, os o gwbl, sydd gennych felly i sicrhau bod arian ar gael ar gyfer yr egin entrepreneuriaid dewr hyn, sydd fel arall wedi'u clymu yn y man cychwyn, ac fel y dywed Purple Shoots, 'Mae hi mor rhwystredig oherwydd rydym wedi gweld dewrder, gwytnwch a syniadau entrepreneuraidd mor anhygoel gan ein cleientiaid; maent wedi dal ati yn wyneb caledi anhygoel, a llawer ohonynt heb unrhyw gymorth o gwbl, ar wahân i ohirio ad-daliadau dros dro'?
English: Well, without knowing any more than you've described about the Purple Shoots, I would suggest that a potential avenue to look at would be the Wales flexible investment fund, which is designed to invest and generate new money, including in financial and professional services investment. And that fund has been extended in value to £0.5 billion, with a further injection of £270 million, giving the fund the firepower to maintain investment over the next 10 years. So, in the first instance, I would suggest that Purple Shoots explores that. However, if you were to share with me the contact details of the organisation, then I would be very happy to ask a representative from Business Wales to explore their needs in more depth.
Welsh: Wel, heb wybod mwy am Purple Shoots na'r hyn rydych wedi'i ddisgrifio, byddwn yn awgrymu mai llwybr posibl i'w ystyried fyddai cronfa buddsoddi hyblyg Cymru, sydd wedi'i chynllunio i fuddsoddi a chynhyrchu arian newydd, gan gynnwys buddsoddiadau mewn cyllid a gwasanaethau proffesiynol. Ac mae'r gronfa honno wedi'i hymestyn yn ei gwerth i £0.5 biliwn, gyda chwistrelliad pellach o £270 miliwn, gan alluogi'r gronfa i gynnal buddsoddiad dros y 10 mlynedd nesaf. Felly, yn y lle cyntaf, byddwn yn awgrymu y dylai Purple Shoots archwilio hynny. Fodd bynnag, pe baech yn rhannu manylion cyswllt y sefydliad gyda mi, byddwn yn fwy na pharod i ofyn i gynrychiolydd o Busnes Cymru archwilio eu hanghenion yn fwy manwl.
English: Question 5 [OQ56452] was withdrawn. Question 6, Paul Davies.
Welsh: Mae cwestiwn 5 [OQ56452] wedi'i dynnu'n ôl. Cwestiwn 6, Paul Davies.
English: Yes. Our priorities are to provide certainty for our public services, help rebuild a greener economy and to make changes for a fairer, more equal Wales. This includes an increased settlement of £179.4 million for Pembrokeshire County Council and £48.7 million towards a new 11-to-19 secondary school building for Haverfordwest high.
Welsh: Gwnaf. Ein blaenoriaethau yw darparu sicrwydd ar gyfer ein gwasanaethau cyhoeddus, helpu i ailadeiladu economi fwy gwyrdd a gwneud newidiadau i sicrhau Cymru decach a mwy cyfartal. Mae hyn yn cynnwys setliad uwch o £179.4 miliwn i Gyngor Sir Penfro a £48.7 miliwn tuag at adeilad ysgol uwchradd newydd i ddisgyblion 11 i 19 oed ysgol uwchradd Hwlffordd.
English: Thank you for that response. Minister, it is vital that the Welsh Government prioritises its resources to support lives and livelihoods during the COVID pandemic. I've received representations from local businesses and individuals in Pembrokeshire who have slipped through the net in terms of accessing Government support, despite, of course, the funds that you've just said that you've allocated to Pembrokeshire. It is vital that funds designated to support our businesses actually reach those businesses that require support. So, Minister, what processes have you undertaken in your role as finance Minister to monitor the effectiveness of Government spend during the pandemic, and what assurances can you offer the people of Pembrokeshire that the Welsh Government is ensuring that its support reaches those that actually need it?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ymateb hwnnw. Nawr, Weinidog, mae'n hanfodol fod Llywodraeth Cymru yn blaenoriaethu ei hadnoddau i gynnal bywydau a bywoliaeth pobl yn ystod y pandemig COVID. Rwyf wedi derbyn sylwadau gan fusnesau lleol ac unigolion yn Sir Benfro sydd wedi llithro drwy'r rhwyd o ran cael mynediad at gymorth y Llywodraeth, er gwaethaf, wrth gwrs, yr arian rydych newydd ddweud eich bod wedi'i ddyrannu i Sir Benfro. Mae'n hanfodol fod cronfeydd a ddynodwyd i gefnogi ein busnesau yn cyrraedd y busnesau hynny sydd angen cymorth mewn gwirionedd. Felly, Weinidog, pa brosesau rydych wedi'u rhoi ar waith yn eich rôl fel Gweinidog cyllid i fonitro effeithiolrwydd gwariant y Llywodraeth yn ystod y pandemig, a pha sicrwydd y gallwch ei gynnig i bobl Sir Benfro fod Llywodraeth Cymru yn sicrhau bod ei chymorth yn cyrraedd y rhai sydd ei angen mewn gwirionedd?
English: The Welsh Government put in place some formal evaluation processes, particularly of the non-domestic rates grant support, to ensure that the funding was reaching those businesses that we intended for it to reach, and we've been keen to ensure that we have those monitoring and evaluation points built into our projects. Since the start of the pandemic, businesses in Pembrokeshire have received over £91 million from the economic resilience fund, and our other restriction-based funds. For example, our latest restrictions-based fund has seen 4,380 grants paid to businesses in Pembrokeshire, worth £14.1 million. We've also provided 628 businesses with £10.1 million of support under phases 1 and 2 of the ERF, and that's safeguarded in Pembrokeshire alone 4,585 jobs, which I think is a tremendous achievement in very difficult times. And, of course, through the loan scheme, then, through the DBW, we've provided over £5.4 million to 80 businesses in Pembrokeshire, helping to safeguard a further 915 jobs. So, there certainly is significant funding going into Pembrokeshire, but, again, there will be businesses that we have not yet been able to reach, and I'm always interested and keen to understand where those gaps in provision are. If there is further information that you can share with me about specific businesses, I'd be very interested to receive that.
Welsh: Sefydlodd Llywodraeth Cymru rai prosesau gwerthuso ffurfiol, yn enwedig y cymorth grant ardrethi annomestig, i sicrhau bod y cyllid yn cyrraedd y busnesau y bwriadwyd iddo eu cyrraedd, ac rydym wedi bod yn awyddus i sicrhau bod y pwyntiau monitro a gwerthuso hynny'n cael eu hymgorffori yn ein prosiectau. Ers dechrau'r pandemig, mae busnesau yn Sir Benfro wedi derbyn dros £91 miliwn o'r gronfa cadernid economaidd, a'n cronfeydd eraill sy'n seiliedig ar gyfyngiadau. Felly, er enghraifft, mae ein cronfa ddiweddaraf sy'n seiliedig ar gyfyngiadau wedi darparu 4,380 o grantiau i fusnesau yn Sir Benfro sy'n werth £14.1 miliwn. Rydym hefyd wedi darparu £10.1 miliwn o gefnogaeth i 628 o fusnesau o dan gamau 1 a 2 y gronfa cadernid economaidd, ac mae hynny wedi diogelu 4,585 o swyddi yn Sir Benfro yn unig, sy'n gyflawniad aruthrol yn fy marn i mewn cyfnod anodd iawn. Ac wrth gwrs, drwy'r cynllun benthyciadau, drwy Fanc Datblygu Cymru, rydym wedi darparu dros £5.4 miliwn i 80 o fusnesau yn Sir Benfro, gan helpu i ddiogelu 915 o swyddi eraill. Felly, yn sicr, mae arian sylweddol yn mynd i Sir Benfro, ond unwaith eto, bydd yna fusnesau nad ydym wedi gallu eu cyrraedd eto, ac mae gennyf ddiddordeb bob amser mewn deall ble mae'r bylchau yn y ddarpariaeth. Os oes gwybodaeth bellach y gallwch ei rhannu â mi am fusnesau penodol, byddwn yn awyddus iawn i'w chael.
English: Last week, ministerial colleagues and I met with the Secretary of State for Wales and the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, where they reiterated their intent to run a competitive fund from Westminster, contrary to what was announced in the November spending review.
Welsh: Yr wythnos diwethaf, cyfarfu cyd-Weinidogion a minnau ag Ysgrifennydd Gwladol Cymru a'r Ysgrifennydd Gwladol dros Dai, Cymunedau a Llywodraeth Leol lle gwnaethant ailadrodd eu bwriad i weithredu cronfa gystadleuol o San Steffan, yn groes i'r hyn a gyhoeddwyd yn yr adolygiad o wariant ym mis Tachwedd.
English: It's astonishing, isn't it? The levelling-up fund is a direct affront to Wales's devolution settlement, Minister, I'm sure you'll agree, and it circumvents our democratic institutions. Not only is the Senedd excluded from decisions that will be taken in Whitehall, but the fund ties the success of community projects to representation made by MPs in Westminster, even as the UK Government cuts the number of Welsh MPs by a fifth. Surely, decisions made for Wales should be made in Wales. Given that England's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government will be overseeing the scheme, what assurances have you received that they will be able to assess accurately Welsh bids, given their complete lack of expertise in devolved areas?
Welsh: Onid yw'n rhyfeddol? Mae'r gronfa codi'r gwastad yn sarhad uniongyrchol i setliad datganoli Cymru, Weinidog, rwy'n siŵr y byddwch yn cytuno, ac mae'n mynd heibio i'n sefydliadau democrataidd. Nid yn unig y mae'r Senedd wedi'i heithrio o benderfyniadau a fydd yn cael eu gwneud yn Whitehall, ond mae'r gronfa'n clymu llwyddiant prosiectau cymunedol â sylwadau a wnaed gan Aelodau Seneddol yn San Steffan, hyd yn oed wrth i Lywodraeth y DU dorri un rhan o bump oddi ar nifer yr Aelodau Seneddol o Gymru. Does bosibl na ddylid gwneud penderfyniadau i Gymru yng Nghymru. Felly, o gofio y bydd Gweinyddiaeth Tai, Cymunedau a Llywodraeth Leol Lloegr yn goruchwylio'r cynllun, pa sicrwydd a gawsoch y byddant yn gallu asesu cynigion Cymru yn gywir, o ystyried eu diffyg arbenigedd llwyr mewn meysydd datganoledig?
English: I have absolutely no confidence that the MHCLG department in the UK Government will do a good job of this. I take that view because of the record upon which they stand. The UK Parliament's Public Accounts Committee has released its report on the towns fund in England and found a lack of transparency and accusations of political bias in the selection process, lack of consistent or transparent stakeholder engagement, a lack of capacity at local level to effectively implement those proposals and a potential risk to the civil service's reputation for integrity and impartiality. Under any other Government, that would be absolutely shocking, but this just seems to be run-of-the-mill and accepted behaviour. So, I don't have trust that the UK Government will be able to deliver for Wales. We've only just seen the criteria upon which the levelling-up fund will work, and we have some real concerns about that in terms of the selection methodologies for the fund. The choice of indicators really does omit things that are important to us here in Wales. They don't look at indices of deprivation, for example, and they're not interested in looking at transport data. All of those things will only serve to disadvantage Wales when we are compared to other regions in terms of the bids that are being made to that fund. So, all we have, I think, at the moment, unfortunately, are reasons to be concerned, rather than optimistic.
Welsh: Wel, nid oes gennyf hyder o gwbl y bydd yr adran Dai, Cymunedau a Llywodraeth Leol yn Llywodraeth y DU yn gwneud gwaith da o hyn. Rwy'n ffurfio'r farn honno oherwydd eu hanes yn y gorffennol. Mae Pwyllgor Cyfrifon Cyhoeddus Llywodraeth y DU wedi rhyddhau ei adroddiad ar y gronfa drefi yn Lloegr ac maent wedi canfod diffyg tryloywder a chyhuddiadau o ragfarn wleidyddol yn y broses ddethol, diffyg ymgysylltiad cyson a thryloyw â rhanddeiliaid, diffyg capasiti ar lefel leol i weithredu'r cynigion hynny'n effeithiol ynghyd a risg bosibl i enw da'r gwasanaeth sifil am fod yn onest ac yn ddiduedd. O dan unrhyw Lywodraeth arall, byddai hynny'n gwbl ysgytwol, ond mae'n ymddangos bod hyn yn ymddygiad arferol a derbyniol. Felly, nid oes gennyf ffydd y bydd Llywodraeth y DU yn gallu cyflawni dros Gymru. Rydym newydd weld meini prawf y gronfa codi'r gwastad ac mae gennym bryderon gwirioneddol ynglŷn â'r methodolegau dethol ar gyfer y gronfa. Mae'r dewis o ddangosyddion yn hepgor pethau sy'n bwysig i ni yma yng Nghymru. Felly, nid ydynt yn edrych ar fynegeion amddifadedd er enghraifft, ac nid oes ganddynt ddiddordeb mewn edrych ar ddata trafnidiaeth. Bydd yr holl bethau hynny'n rhoi Cymru o dan anfantais pan fyddwn yn cael ein cymharu â rhanbarthau eraill mewn perthynas â'r cynigion sy'n cael eu gwneud i'r gronfa honno. Felly, y cyfan sydd gennym ar hyn o bryd, yn anffodus, yw rhesymau dros bryderu, yn hytrach na rhesymau dros fod yn optimistaidd.
English: While the additional £735 million revenue is welcome, the majority is time-limited COVID funding and doesn't make up for a decade of austerity. In stark contrast to the £224.5 million capital boost we recently announced, benefiting all parts of Wales including Caerphilly, the UK Government failed to provide any extra capital.
Welsh: Er bod y refeniw ychwanegol o £735 miliwn i'w groesawu, mae'r mwyafrif yn gyllid COVID sy'n gyfyngedig o ran amser ac nid yw'n gwneud iawn am ddegawd o gyni. Mewn cyferbyniad llwyr â'r hwb cyfalaf o £224.5 miliwn a gyhoeddwyd gennym yn ddiweddar, ac a fydd o fudd i bob rhan o Gymru gan gynnwys Caerffili, methodd Llywodraeth y DU ddarparu unrhyw gyfalaf ychwanegol.