English: Well, I thank the Member for the question. I suspect the question was dated before she or her adviser had the opportunity to actually read the written statement that I made, because the appeal was lodged and the appeal has actually been successful, and there will be a hearing on that appeal. And it's very interesting that the appeal court judge recognised the significant constitutional issue that it's raised, which is why that leave was actually granted. In terms of no powers having been taken away, the fact of the matter is that that is just rankly untrue - for one example, the issue of state aid, which is now a reserved matter but wasn't previously. Now, that is really significant in terms of the way the Welsh Government can exercise its economic powers. But I make the further point to you again in terms of what is important: you're right, when you go onto the doorstep with people, the first thing they don't ask about is the constitution. But if, for example, you go to the people of Wales and you say, 'What do you think about community safety? How safe do you think your community is?' They will start talking about, 'Well, we need to see the police here, we need to make sure there's better engagement', et cetera, and then you have to explain actually that, of course, policing isn't devolved, and people don't understand that. When you talk about the fact that one of our objectives is in terms of equality and social justice and you find out that equal opportunities is a reserved matter. There is an illogicality to what is there, and I'm afraid the Member has fallen into the trap, along with her colleagues, of putting their head in the sand and ignoring what is actually happening in reality and the opportunities that exist to address some of these anomalies.
Welsh: Wel, diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn. Rwy'n tybio bod y cwestiwn wedi dyddio cyn iddi hi neu ei chynghorydd gael cyfle i ddarllen y datganiad ysgrifenedig a wneuthum, oherwydd cyflwynwyd yr apêl ac mae'r apêl wedi bod yn llwyddiannus mewn gwirionedd, a bydd gwrandawiad ar yr apêl honno. Ac mae'n ddiddorol iawn fod barnwr y llys apêl wedi cydnabod y mater cyfansoddiadol sylweddol y mae wedi'i godi, a dyna pam y caniatawyd hynny mewn gwirionedd. Ar yr honiad nad oes unrhyw bwerau wedi'u dileu, y gwir amdani yw bod hynny'n hollol anghywir - er enghraifft, mater cymorth gwladwriaethol, sydd bellach yn fater a gedwir yn ôl ond nad oedd yn flaenorol. Nawr, mae hynny'n arwyddocaol iawn o ystyried y ffordd y gall Llywodraeth Cymru arfer ei phwerau economaidd. Ond rwy'n gwneud y pwynt pellach eto ynglŷn â'r hyn sy'n bwysig: rydych chi'n iawn, pan fyddwch chi'n siarad gyda phobl ar garreg y drws, nid y cyfansoddiad yw'r peth cyntaf y byddant yn gofyn yn ei gylch. Ond os ewch chi, er enghraifft, at bobl Cymru a dweud, 'Beth yw eich barn am ddiogelwch cymunedol? Pa mor ddiogel yw eich cymuned yn eich barn chi?' byddant yn dechrau siarad am, 'Wel, mae angen inni weld yr heddlu yma, mae angen inni sicrhau gwell ymgysylltiad', ac yn y blaen, ac yna mae'n rhaid i chi esbonio mewn gwirionedd nad yw plismona wedi'i ddatganoli wrth gwrs, ac nid yw pobl yn deall hynny. Pan soniwch mai un o'n hamcanion yw cydraddoldeb a chyfiawnder cymdeithasol a'ch bod yn darganfod bod cyfle cyfartal yn fater a gedwir yn ôl. Mae'r hyn sydd yno'n afresymegol, ac mae arnaf ofn fod yr Aelod wedi syrthio i'r fagl, ynghyd â'i chyd-Aelodau, o roi eu pen yn y tywod ac anwybyddu'r hyn sy'n digwydd mewn gwirionedd a'r cyfleoedd sy'n bodoli i fynd i'r afael â rhai o'r anghysondebau hyn.