English: Thank you for the questions. As the Member knows, we're developing our net zero skills plan. There are some statements due to be made by the Office for National Statistics and others later in the spring, but I'm interested in how we are able to close the circle. I have actually had further conversations in the last week about the response from a variety of stakeholders, both providers of skills acquisition, further education and others, but also businesses - and business awareness - themselves, and it varies in different sectors. There's a challenge here about raising awareness of the journey to net zero, and the fact that businesses in all sectors will need to change some of the ways they look to work. It's why there's going to need to be not just an approach on what the policy is, but raising awareness, and how we equip people who will come into the world of work for the first time, or who are near the start of their career, as well as those of us who have been at work for a longer of period of time, and how you equip and re-equip the current generation of people already in work. And you'll see that as we take forward the net zero skills plan, but also the work we'll then do in more detail in different sectors. So, I'll have more to say in the coming months, when we actually launch the plan, and you'll see some of that engagement. And I'm sure that, with your other hat on, not of being the Conservative spokesperson but of being the committee Chair, you'll be interested in some of the engagement. And I look forward to the evidence and the examination that I'm sure the committee will give. On the Development Bank of Wales's green business loans, you won't have to wait much longer; I think Luke Fletcher has asked this as well. In the coming weeks, that launch will take place to set out how the development bank will be able to support businesses to both reduce costs to save the bottom line, and to do so on a sustained basis, to decarbonise their production, and the advice function will be part of that scheme as well. So, not much longer to wait. But, that does show that we're using the powers and the ability that we have to make a practical difference. And when it comes to inter-governmental relations, it requires the UK Government to be a willing partner in a conversation. The meeting that I had today with a Minister within the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy in the UK Government, a Scottish Government Minister and a civil servant from Northern Ireland was the first one in nine or 10 months. That isn't because we decided not to have the meetings; it was a choice by the UK Government for a variety of reasons for those not to happen. We have always been prepared to engage constructively. It was the same in the meeting that I had earlier this week with Michael Gove on a range of other issues as well. We know that we won't always agree, but we'd much rather have a conversation and to do that at an early enough stage to make a difference. What we have found at various points in the last couple of years is that we have been engaged at a point where we are being told what the decision is, or there is a demand that we agree to a policy and a perspective that we know we will not find agreement on. It's why I pointed out in my statement areas where agreement has been possible, like the fact that we compromised and had agreed a position on free ports, to contrast that with the approach taken on shared prosperity and the shared prosperity fund, for example. On an innovation strategy, I think I've been as clear as I can be: it's a commitment in the co-operation agreement. We expect to launch that before the end of February, so, again, not much longer to go. When it comes to steel, I welcome what the Members had to say about needing clarity on our future for the sector. That can only come if there is a proper road map from the UK Government on what shared investment looks like and the sort of priorities it wants to set. And that's really important right across the whole sector, not just for the steel sector itself, but then what's going to happen in procurement in a range of other areas where we could and should be having a positive impact from seeing more British-manufactured steel used in a range of products. That would also, I think, require a different approach on infrastructure investment as well. And when it comes to floating offshore wind, again, an area where steel could and should be used, we have been really clear in our conversations with the Crown Estate. Myself and Julie James, the climate change Minister, have met with the Crown Estate several times, and we've been clear about what we want to see with the future pipeline of leasing rounds, so not just something where there's an opportunity for a period of months and a shorter period of years, but a longer term round of leasing, so you can get longer term investment. And that, I think, would underpin significant investment in port infrastructure in north and south Wales, to allow opportunities to be taken up properly. And also we've been very clear with the Crown Estate that we want to see a positive advantage and a requirement made in the next leasing round on localised supply chain, and that, actually, the bids would then have to be seen through in practice. There would need to be a contract mechanism to make sure that a bid can't read fantastically well on paper and that something entirely different takes place in reality over the coming years. And I would have thought that the Member and others would be supportive of that, because making sure we generate greater economic value in those supply chains should be a common objective right across the Chamber. And finally, on your point, you mentioned skills at the end; it's one of the areas we have invested in consistently. We have a good record on investing in skills and apprenticeships through the lifetime of devolution. It's one of the levers we do have and make a difference with. It's also one of the levers where it's harder to do more because of the lack of a proper settlement on post-EU funds. That £1 billion we're going to lose makes a real difference in how we support the economy, how we equip people with skills for today, and for tomorrow, and I really would welcome Welsh Conservatives joining with voices from across the Chamber and wider society and other sectors in calling on the UK Government to revisit what it's done, revisit its broken manifesto promises, and give Wales what it promised it would have, full replacement for former EU structural funds, and that would make a difference to our economic future.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiynau. Fel gŵyr yr Aelod, rydym yn datblygu ein cynllun sgiliau sero net. Mae rhai datganiadau i'w gwneud gan y Swyddfa Ystadegau Gwladol ac eraill yn ddiweddarach yn y gwanwyn, ond mae gennyf i ddiddordeb yn y ffordd y gallwn ni gau'r cylch. Mewn gwirionedd, rwyf wedi cael sgyrsiau ychwanegol yn ystod yr wythnos diwethaf am ymateb amrywiaeth o randdeiliaid, darparwyr caffael sgiliau, addysg bellach ac eraill, ond hefyd busnesau - ac ymwybyddiaeth busnes - eu hunain, ac mae'n amrywio mewn gwahanol sectorau. Mae her yma o ran codi ymwybyddiaeth o'r daith i sero net, a'r ffaith y bydd angen i fusnesau ym mhob sector newid rhai o'r ffyrdd y maen nhw'n bwriadu gweithio. Dyna pam y bydd angen nid yn unig dull gweithredu ynghylch beth yw'r polisi, ond codi ymwybyddiaeth, a sut yr ydym yn arfogi pobl a fydd yn dod i fyd gwaith am y tro cyntaf, neu sydd yn agos at ddechrau eu gyrfa, yn ogystal â'r rhai ohonom sydd wedi bod yn y gwaith am gyfnod hirach, a sut rydych chi'n arfogi ac yn ailarfogi'r genhedlaeth bresennol o bobl sydd eisoes mewn gwaith. Ac fe welwch hynny wrth i ni fwrw ymlaen â'r cynllun sgiliau sero net, ond hefyd y gwaith y byddwn wedyn yn ei wneud yn fanylach mewn gwahanol sectorau. Felly, bydd gennyf i fwy i'w ddweud yn y misoedd nesaf, pan fyddwn ni'n lansio'r cynllun mewn gwirionedd, a byddwch chi'n gweld rhywfaint o'r ymgysylltu hwnnw. Ac rwy'n siŵr, gan wisgo eich het arall, nid yn llefarydd y Ceidwadwyr ond yn Gadeirydd y pwyllgor, bydd gennych ddiddordeb mewn rhai o'r ymgysylltiadau. Ac rwy'n edrych ymlaen at y dystiolaeth a'r archwiliad rwy'n siŵr y bydd y pwyllgor yn ei roi. O ran benthyciadau busnes gwyrdd Banc Datblygu Cymru, ni fydd yn rhaid i chi aros llawer hirach; rwy'n credu bod Luke Fletcher wedi gofyn hyn hefyd. Yn ystod yr wythnosau nesaf, bydd y lansiad hwnnw'n digwydd i nodi sut y bydd y banc datblygu yn gallu cefnogi busnesau i leihau costau i arbed y llinell waelod, ac i wneud hynny yn barhaus, i ddatgarboneiddio eu cynhyrchiant, a bydd y swyddogaeth gyngor yn rhan o'r cynllun hwnnw hefyd. Felly, dim llawer hirach i aros. Ond, mae hynny'n dangos ein bod ni'n defnyddio'r pwerau a'r gallu sydd gennym i wneud gwahaniaeth ymarferol. Ac o ran cysylltiadau rhynglywodraethol, mae gofyn i Lywodraeth y DU fod yn bartner parod mewn sgwrs. Y cyfarfod a gefais heddiw gyda Gweinidog yn yr Adran Fusnes, Ynni a Strategaeth Ddiwydiannol Llywodraeth y DU, Gweinidog Llywodraeth yr Alban a gwas sifil o Ogledd Iwerddon oedd yr un cyntaf mewn naw neu 10 mis. Nid oherwydd i ni benderfynu peidio â chael y cyfarfodydd; dewis Llywodraeth y DU am amryw o resymau oedd atal y rhain rhag digwydd. Rydym bob amser wedi bod yn barod i ymgysylltu'n adeiladol. Felly hefyd yn y cyfarfod a gefais yn gynharach yr wythnos hon gyda Michael Gove ar amryw o faterion eraill. Rydym ni'n gwybod na fyddwn ni wastad yn cytuno, ond byddai'n llawer gwell gennym ni gael sgwrs ac i wneud hynny mewn cyfnod digon cynnar i wneud gwahaniaeth. Yr hyn yr ydym ni wedi'i ganfod ar wahanol adegau yn ystod y ddwy flynedd ddiwethaf yw eu bod wedi ymgysylltu â ni ar adeg pan gawn wybod beth yw'r penderfyniad, neu pan fyddant yn mynnu ein bod yn cytuno â pholisi a safbwynt yr ydym yn gwybod na fyddwn yn dod o hyd i gytundeb arnyn nhw. Dyna pam y tynnais sylw yn fy natganiad at feysydd lle bu cytundeb yn bosibl, fel y ffaith ein bod wedi cyfaddawdu ac wedi cytuno ar safbwynt ynghylch porthladdoedd rhydd, i gyferbynnu hynny â'r dull a gymerwyd ar ffyniant cyffredin a'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin, er enghraifft. O ran strategaeth arloesi, rwy'n credu fy mod i wedi bod mor glir ag y gallaf i fod: mae'n ymrwymiad yn y cytundeb cydweithredu. Rydym yn disgwyl lansio honno cyn diwedd mis Chwefror, felly, eto, dim llawer hirach i aros. O ran dur, rwy'n croesawu'r hyn yr oedd gan yr Aelodau i'w ddweud sef bod angen eglurder ynghylch dyfodol y sector. Gall hynny ond digwydd pan fo gan Lywodraeth y DU fap ffordd priodol ynglŷn â ffurf buddsoddi ar y cyd a'r math o flaenoriaethau y mae eisiau eu gosod. Ac mae hynny'n bwysig iawn ar draws y sector cyfan, nid yn unig i'r sector dur ei hun, ond yna yr hyn sy'n mynd i ddigwydd ym maes caffael mewn ystod o feysydd eraill lle gallem ac y dylem ni fod yn cael effaith gadarnhaol o weld mwy o ddur sy'n cael ei gynhyrchu ym Mhrydain yn cael ei ddefnyddio mewn ystod o gynhyrchion. Byddai hynny hefyd, yn fy marn i, angen dull gwahanol o fuddsoddi mewn seilwaith hefyd. Ac o ran gwynt arnofiol ar y môr, eto, maes lle gellid ac y dylid defnyddio dur, rydym wedi bod yn glir iawn yn ein sgyrsiau gydag Ystad y Goron. Rwyf i a Julie James, y Gweinidog Newid Hinsawdd, wedi cwrdd ag Ystad y Goron sawl gwaith, ac rydym ni wedi bod yn glir am yr hyn yr ydym eisiau ei weld gyda ffrwd o rowndiau prydlesu yn y dyfodol, felly nid rhywbeth pryd y ceir cyfle am gyfnod o fisoedd a chyfnod byrrach o flynyddoedd, ond rownd o brydlesu mwy hirdymor, er mwyn i chi allu cael buddsoddiad mwy hirdymor. A byddai hynny, yn fy marn i, yn sail i fuddsoddiad sylweddol yn seilwaith porthladdoedd y gogledd a'r de, er mwyn manteisio'n llawn ar gyfleoedd. A hefyd rydym wedi bod yn glir iawn gydag Ystad y Goron ein bod eisiau gweld mantais gadarnhaol a gofyniad yn y rownd brydlesu nesaf am gadwyn gyflenwi leol, ac y byddai'n rhaid i geisiadau wedyn gyflawni yn ymarferol. Byddai angen dull contractio i wneud yn siŵr nad yw cais yn ymddangos yn un gwych ar bapur ac yna bod rhywbeth hollol wahanol yn digwydd mewn gwirionedd dros y blynyddoedd nesaf. Ac fe fyddwn i'n credu y byddai'r Aelod ac eraill yn gefnogol i hynny, oherwydd dylai sicrhau ein bod yn cynhyrchu mwy o werth economaidd yn y cadwyni cyflenwi hynny fod yn nod gyffredin ar draws y Siambr. Ac yn olaf, ar eich pwynt, fe wnaethoch chi sôn am sgiliau ar y diwedd; mae'n un o'r meysydd yr ydym ni wedi buddsoddi ynddo yn gyson. Mae gennym hanes da o ran buddsoddi mewn sgiliau a phrentisiaethau drwy oes datganoli. Mae'n un o'r ysgogiadau sydd gennym i wneud gwahaniaeth. Mae hefyd yn un o'r ysgogiadau lle mae'n anoddach gwneud mwy oherwydd diffyg setliad priodol ynghylch cronfeydd ar ôl ymadael â'r UE. Mae'r £1 biliwn yna rydym ni'n mynd i'w golli yn gwneud gwahaniaeth gwirioneddol o ran sut rydym ni'n cefnogi'r economi, sut rydym ni'n arfogi pobl â sgiliau ar gyfer heddiw, ac ar gyfer yfory, a byddwn i wir yn croesawu gweld y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig yn ymuno â lleisiau o bob rhan o'r Siambr a'r gymdeithas yn ehangach a sectorau eraill i alw ar Lywodraeth y DU i ailedrych ar yr hyn mae wedi ei wneud, ailedrych ar ei addewidion o'r maniffesto a dorrwyd, a rhoi i Gymru yr hyn a addawodd, cyllido llawn sy'n disodli cronfeydd strwythurol yr UE, a byddai hynny'n gwneud gwahaniaeth i'n dyfodol economaidd.