English: Diolch, Llywydd. Amendment 24 does insert a provision to clarify the defence of a person facing proceedings for an offence of supplying single-use plastic to consumers in Wales. Now, I tabled this as I do think that it is important that businesses are protected from being wrongfully accused of supplying single-use plastic. Businesses have had a tough time during COVID and indeed, now, they're still feeling the effects of COVID and many other pressures, and the last thing that we want to be doing here is putting overburdensome - . And we need to make sure that protections are in place for them. Now, I appreciate that in Stage 2, it was discussed that businesses will be made aware of this piece of legislation and, as such, will have time to use up their existing supply. I feel that the matter is more complicated than that. We have businesses with a physical store in Wales that will supply products internationally through online orders as well as in person to their Welsh customers. They will have stock on their premises that they are not selling in their physical store. If an authorised officer enters their premises, they'll see this stock; they'll see on the business's website that they are selling banned items. This amendment seeks to protect these businesses from wrongfully being found guilty of an offence. I think this is important to be on the face of the Bill. Amendment 42, which was tabled by Delyth, inserts a provision that clarifies that, where more than one single-use plastic product is supplied together, it is treated as just one offence. I have taken this to mean that, where banned single-use plastic products are sold in a multipack, it counts for just one offence rather than somebody being charged with 100 offences for selling 100 plastic straws in a pack. I'd like to think that this is correct, though, if I'm wrong, please let me know, Delyth. Diolch.
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Mae gwelliant 24 yn rhoi darpariaeth i egluro amddiffyniad rhywun sy'n wynebu achos am drosedd o gyflenwi plastig untro i ddefnyddwyr yng Nghymru. Nawr, fe wnes i gyflwyno hwn gan fy mod yn credu ei bod hi'n bwysig y caiff busnesau eu diogelu rhag cael eu cyhuddo ar gam o gyflenwi plastig untro. Mae busnesau wedi cael amser caled yn ystod COVID ac yn wir, nawr, maen nhw'n dal i deimlo effeithiau COVID a llawer o bwysau eraill, a'r peth olaf yr ydym ni eisiau ei wneud yma yw rhoi llyffetheiriau gormodol - . Ac mae angen i ni wneud yn siŵr bod amddiffyniadau ar eu cyfer. Nawr, rwy'n sylweddoli, yng Nghyfnod 2, y trafodwyd y bydd busnesau'n cael gwybod am y darn hwn o ddeddfwriaeth ac, o'r herwydd, bydd ganddyn nhw amser i ddefnyddio eu cyflenwad presennol. Rwy'n teimlo bod y mater yn fwy cymhleth na hynny. Mae gennym ni fusnesau sydd â siop ddiriaethol yng Nghymru a fydd yn cyflenwi cynnyrch yn rhyngwladol trwy archebion ar-lein yn ogystal ag yn bersonol i'w cwsmeriaid yng Nghymru. Bydd ganddyn nhw stoc ar eu safle nad ydyn nhw'n gwerthu yn eu siop ddiriaethol. Os bydd swyddog awdurdodedig yn ymweld â'u safle, byddant yn gweld y stoc hon; fe fyddan nhw'n gweld ar wefan y busnes eu bod yn gwerthu eitemau sydd wedi eu gwahardd. Mae'r gwelliant hwn yn ceisio amddiffyn y busnesau hyn rhag cael eu canfod yn euog ar gam o drosedd. Rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n bwysig fod hyn ar wyneb y Bil. Mae gwelliant 42, a gyflwynwyd gan Delyth, yn mewnosod darpariaeth sy'n egluro, pan gyflenwir mwy nag un cynnyrch plastig untro gyda'i gilydd, caiff ei drin fel un drosedd yn unig. Rwyf wedi cymryd hyn i olygu, pan gaiff cynhyrchion plastig untro sydd wedi'u gwahardd eu gwerthu mewn pecynnau aml-gynnwys, mae'n cyfrif fel un drosedd yn unig yn hytrach na bod rhywun yn cael ei gyhuddo o 100 o droseddau am werthu 100 o wellt plastig mewn pecyn. Hoffwn feddwl bod hyn yn gywir, ond, os ydw i'n anghywir, rhowch wybod i mi, Delyth. Diolch.