techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you very much, Chair, and good morning, Minister. Thank you for joining us and for being willing to answer our questions. I want to ask specifically about social housing and affordable housing. Now, to date, you do have a plan that you claim is ambitious in terms of building 20,000 carbon neutral homes over the term of this Senedd, and that equates to some 4,000 homes per annum. We haven't got close to that over the past 20 years. I think 3,000 a year is what we have delivered. So, how do you think we can achieve these targets?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Gadeirydd. Helo, Weinidog. Diolch am ymuno ac am fod yn barod i ateb y cwestiynau yma. Dwi am holi yn benodol ynghylch tai cymdeithasol a thai fforddiadwy. Hyd yma, mae gennych chi gynllun dŷch chi'n dweud ac yn honni sydd yn uchelgeisiol o adeiladu 20,000 o dai carbon niwtral dros dymor y Senedd yma. Mae hynny'n gyfwerth â thua 4,000 o gartrefi y flwyddyn. Dydyn ni ddim wedi dod yn agos at hynny yn ystod yr 20 mlynedd diwethaf. Dwi'n meddwl mai 3,000 y flwyddyn ydy beth dŷn ni wedi bod yn ei wneud. Sut dŷch chi'n meddwl ein bod ni'n mynd i gyflawni a chyrraedd y targedau yma?
English: Thank you, Minister. It's interesting to hear that 20,000 homes in Wales over five years is ambitious, whilst looking to the Irish Government, who are looking to build 33,000 social homes per year for the Republic of Ireland. So, their ambition is slightly different. But if we are to deliver this number of social houses, then local development plans need to reflect this. So, how are you going to actually influence the Planning Inspectorate, who have reduced the number of affordable houses, or limited the number of affordable houses, that are required from local authorities? Sometimes, local authorities have developed an LDP and asked for 50 per cent affordable housing, and the Planning Inspectorate's rejected that and forced them down in terms of the percentage to 10 per cent. We need to review that and ensure that LDPs reflect your ambition. So, how are you going to ensure that that's the case?
Welsh: Diolch, Weinidog. Mae'n ddifyr clywed bod 20,000 o dai yng Nghymru dros bum mlynedd yn uchelgeisiol, tra'n edrych ar Lywodraeth yr Iwerddon - maen nhw'n edrych i adeiladu 33,000 o dai cymdeithasol y flwyddyn ar gyfer y weriniaeth yn fanna. Felly, mae yna uchelgais ychydig yn wahanol rhwng y ddwy wlad. Ond, os ydyn ni'n mynd i gyrraedd y nifer yma o dai cymdeithasol, mae angen i gynlluniau datblygu lleol adlewyrchu hyn. Sut ydych chi'n mynd i gael rheolaeth ar yr Arolygiaeth Gynllunio sydd, hyd yma, wedi cyfyngu ar ganran y nifer o dai fforddiadwy sydd yn ofynnol i awdurdodau lleol ddatblygu? Weithiau, mae rhai awdurdodau lleol wedi datblygu cynllun datblygu lleol ac wedi gofyn am 50 y cant o dai fforddiadwy, ac mae'r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio yn eu gwrthod nhw, ac yn eu gorfodi nhw lawr i 10 y cant. Mae angen adolygu hynny, ac mae angen sicrhau bod y cynlluniau datblygu lleol felly yn adlewyrchu eich uchelgais chi. Sut ydych chi am sicrhau hynny?
English: Thank you for that response, Minister, but I do feel that the Planning Inspectorate is, ultimately, accountable to you, and it's the inspectorate that's been limiting the percentage of affordable homes, so you need to take control of that and to ensure that the inspectorate does allow higher percentages of affordable homes in the LDPs. I want to move on, if I may, to low-carbon homes, something that's to be welcomed in your statement, of course. But I've spoken to a number of housing associations over the past two months, and whilst the £250 million that you've contributed as a Government towards the development of social housing, and these are low-carbon homes - the highest amount your Government has provided - is to be welcomed, the truth is, in terms of the housing associations, that your target of making them low-carbon homes and retrofitting is going to add £15,000 to £20,000 to the cost of building each home. Now, where's that additional funding going to come from consistently over ensuing years in order to deliver the target, and also, in terms of retrofitting, who is going to pay for this over the next years? Because, if housing associations are going to have to foot the bill for retrofitting the current housing stock, it's going to eat into any funding that they have to develop homes for the future. So, there are two elements there: who pays for the retrofitting to make homes low carbon, and is there assurance of continued funding at this level or higher over the ensuing years?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb yna, Weinidog, ond dwi yn teimlo bod yr Arolygiaeth Gynllunio yn atebol i chi yn y pen draw, a'r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio sydd wedi bod yn cyfyngu ar y canran o dai fforddiadwy, felly mae'n rhaid ichi gael rheolaeth ar yr Arolygiaeth Gynllunio a sicrhau bod yr arolygiaeth yna yn caniatáu mwy o ganran o dai fforddiadwy yn y cynlluniau datblygu lleol. Dwi eisiau symud ymlaen ychydig, os yn bosib, at dai carbon isel, eto, rhywbeth sydd i'w groesawu yn eich datganiad chi. Ond dwi wedi siarad efo nifer fawr o gymdeithasau tai dros y ddau fis diwethaf, a thra bod y £250 miliwn rydych chi wedi eu cyfrannu fel Llywodraeth tuag at ddatblygu tai cymdeithasol, a'r rheini yn dai carbon isel - y swm mwyaf mae'ch Llywodraeth chi wedi ei roi - i'w groesawu, y gwir ydy, o ran y cymdeithasau tai, fod eich targed chi o'u gwneud nhw'n dai carbon isel a retrofit -io yn mynd i ychwanegu £15,000 i £20,000 yn ychwanegol at gost adeiladu pob tŷ. Rŵan, lle mae'r arian ychwanegol yna yn mynd i ddod yn gyson dros y blynyddoedd nesaf er mwyn cyrraedd y targed, a hefyd, o ran retrofit- io, pwy sydd yn mynd i dalu am hyn dros y blynyddoedd nesaf? Oherwydd, os ydy cymdeithasau tai yn mynd i orfod talu i retrofit- io'r stoc dai bresennol i'w gwneud nhw'n garbon isel, mae'n mynd i fwyta i fewn i unrhyw bres sydd ganddyn nhw i ddatblygu tai yn y dyfodol. Felly, mae yna ddwy elfen yn fanno: pwy sy'n talu am y retrofit- io i wneud tai yn garbon isel, ac a oes yna sicrwydd bod parhad ariannu i'r lefel yma neu'n uwch yn mynd i fynd ymlaen dros y blynyddoedd nesaf?
English: Thank you. Just on that, £108 million would be enough to retrofit, what, some 10,000 or maybe 15,000 social homes, which is nowhere near enough to meet the demand, so we will need another pot of funding to fund housing associations who need to retrofit. If you think of Adra, for example, who have 6,000 in their housing stock alone - never mind the dozens more in mid and west Wales. So, we need to look at more funding there too. It all comes down to the money. Finally, if I could just turn to one final point, housing associations are reliant, of course, on working with private developers, and they, more often than not, are a small percentage of some private development. So, what are your plans - you've touched on this, and I'm grateful for that - in terms of releasing public sector land in order to allow housing associations to build homes on public sector land and ensuring that there is better value for money, that they can build more homes, because the value of the land is taken out, as you actually take that in releasing that land in the first instance?
Welsh: Diolch. Jest ar hynny, buasai £108 miliwn yn ddigon i retrofit -io, beth, rhyw 10,000 ar y gorau, neu 15,000, o dai cymdeithasol, sydd ddim yn agos i ddigon i'r angen, felly fe fydd angen pot arall o bres er mwyn digolledu cymdeithasau tai sydd angen retrofit -io eu stoc tai nhw. Os ydych chi'n meddwl am gymdeithas tai Adra, er enghraifft, efo 6,000 yn eu stoc tai nhw yn unig - heb sôn am y dwsin neu beth bynnag yn ychwanegol sydd yng nghanolbarth a gorllewin Cymru. Felly, mae angen edrych ar fwy o bres yn y fanno eto. Mae'r cyfan yn mynd lawr i bres, onid ydy e? Yn olaf, serch hynny, os caf i jest droi at un pwynt olaf, mae cymdeithasau tai yn ddibynnol, wrth gwrs, ar gydweithio efo datblygiadau preifat, a'u bod nhw yn amlach na pheidio yn rhan, yn ganran bach o ryw ddatblygiad preifat. Beth ydy eich cynlluniau chi - rŷch chi wedi cyffwrdd ar hwn, a dwi'n ddiolchgar - o ran rhyddhau tir cyhoeddus er mwyn galluogi cymdeithasau tai i adeiladu tai ar dir cyhoeddus, gan dynnu gwerth y tir yna allan a sicrhau bod yna fwy o werth am arian, a'u bod nhw'n medru adeiladu fwy, felly, o dai, gan fod gwerth y tir wedi cael ei dynnu allan, gan eich bod chi'n cymryd y gost yna wrth ryddhau'r tir iddyn nhw?
English: Thank you very much, Chair, and I'd like to thank the Minister for joining us here this morning. May I start by thanking Reg for mentioning the leadership of Denbighshire County Council when it comes to net zero. The reason I refer to that is because I was the county councillor, along with Graham Timms, that introduced that motion to the council and set that in train back in 2018. So, I'm very pleased to hear you make reference to that. The first question I want to ask is on national insurance. The UK Government increased national insurance on employees and employers by 1.25 per cent. Now, this, as I understand it, will mean that Gwynedd Council, for example, will have to pay some £3 million in addition, because of this increase. Throughout the whole of Wales, that accounts to £50 million that councils will have to find to pay for national insurance. Although it wasn't your decision as a Government, and I'm sure you would agree with me that it was a mistake on behalf of the Conservatives in Westminster, what steps are you going to take to compensate our local authorities to enable them to pay this additional burden that has been placed on them?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Gadeirydd, a diolch i'r Gweinidog am ddod ag ymuno efo ni yma y bore yma. Gaf i gychwyn drwy ddweud diolch i Reg ynghynt am sôn am arweiniad Cyngor Sir Ddinbych pan ei fod o'n dod i net sero. Y rheswm dwi'n cyfeirio at hynny yw achos mai fi oedd y cynghorydd sir, ar y cyd â Graham Timms, ddaru gyflwyno'r cynnig yna o flaen Cyngor Sir Ddinbych a gosod yr arweiniad yna yn ôl yn 2018. Felly, dwi'n falch iawn i'ch clywed chi'n cyfeirio at hynny. Ta waeth, mae'r cwestiwn cyntaf dwi eisiau ei holi ynghylch yswiriant gwladol. Ddaru Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Gyfunol gynyddu yswiriant gwladol ar gyflogwyr a chyflogai o 1.25 y cant. Mae hyn yn golygu, yn ôl beth dwi'n ei ddeall, y bydd Cyngor Gwynedd, er enghraifft, yn gorfod talu rhyw £3 miliwn yn ychwanegol allan, oherwydd y cynnydd yma. Trwy Gymru gyfan, mae hynny'n gyfwerth â £50 miliwn yn ychwanegol y mae awdurdodau lleol yn gorfod ei ganfod i dalu am yswiriant gwladol. Er nad eich penderfyniad chi fel Llywodraeth oedd hwn, a dwi'n siŵr eich bod chi'n gytûn ei fod o'n gam gwag ar ran y Ceidwadwyr yn San Steffan, pa gamau rydych chi am eu cymryd i helpu digolledu ein hawdurdodau lleol er mwyn talu'r bwrdwn a'r baich ychwanegol yma sydd yn ofynnol arnyn nhw?
English: Okay, thank you very much. I'm sure you'll receive a number of messages from local authorities mentioning the additional pressures upon them as a result of this. So, if you'd be willing to consider that additional contribution to help to compensate for that - . I do want to refer to joint corporate committees, and, for the benefit of our interpreter, that is corporate joint committee, the CJC. Minister, local authorities are deeply concerned about the pathway to requiring more of these CJCs. In the current climate, with the huge additional pressures on staff, they feel that requiring CJCs of this kind actually takes away from the resources available for core services, and means that staff workstreams will be stopped in order to develop these committees, rather than focusing on the core work of the authorities. I know that you've allocated some funding for these, which is inadequate, particularly in the current climate. Shouldn't you, therefore, be providing a focus, or enabling local authorities to provide focus on extinguishing the flames that local authorities currently face, rather than forcing them down this route of CJCs, given the current circumstances?
Welsh: Ocê, diolch yn fawr iawn. Mae'n siwr y byddwch chi'n cael nifer fawr o negeseuon gan awdurdodau lleol yn sôn am y pwysau ychwanegol fydd arnyn nhw o ganlyniad i hyn. Felly, os byddech chi'n fodlon ystyried y cyfraniad ychwanegol yna i'w digolledu nhw - . Dwi am gyfeirio at bwyllgorau corfforaethol ar y cyd, ac, er lles ein cyfieithwyr, corporate joint committee ydy hynny - CJC. Byddaf i'n eu galw'n bwyllgorau corfforaethol ar y cyd. Weinidog, mae awdurdodau lleol yn pryderu'n arw am y llwybr tuag at orfodi mwy o bwyllgorau corfforaethol ar y cyd. Yn yr hinsawdd bresennol, efo'r pwysau mawr ychwanegol sydd ar staff, maen nhw'n teimlo bod gorfodi pwyllgorau corfforaethol o'r math yma yn tynnu oddi ar adnoddau gwasanaethau craidd, ac yn golygu bod workstreams staff yn gorfod mynd er mwyn datblygu'r pwyllgorau yma, yn hytrach na chanolbwyntio ar waith creiddiol yr awdurdodau. Dwi'n gwybod eich bod chi wedi neilltuo ychydig o bres tuag atyn nhw, sydd yn annigonol, yn enwedig yr hinsawdd yma. Oni ddylech chi, felly, fod yn rhoi ffocws, neu'n galluogi awdurdodau lleol i roi ffocws 100 y cant, ar ddiffodd y tanau presennol sydd yn wynebu awdurdodau lleol a'r pwysau yma, yn hytrach na'u gorfodi nhw i fynd lawr y llwybrau yma o bwyllgorau corfforaethol ar y cyd, fel mae pethau ar hyn o bryd?
English: Thank you. It appears that the feedback you have received is very different to what I've heard in speaking to councillors on the ground. It is interesting to hear that that feedback that you've received is slightly different in terms of what I see as the additional burdensome role of CJCs, as things stand. The additional concern, of course - perhaps you may be aware of this - is that local authorities are concerned that the CJCs are also going to draw in the education departments. So, can you therefore give us a guarantee today that education will not be drawn into the CJCs?
Welsh: Diolch. Mae'n debyg eich bod chi wedi cael adborth gwahanol iawn i'r adborth dwi wedi'i gael, felly, o siarad efo cynghorwyr ar lawr gwlad. Mae'n ddifyr clywed eich bod chi'n cael adborth ychydig yn wahanol ar beth dwi'n ei weld fel rôl feichus ychwanegol CJCs, fel mae hi'n mynd ar hyn o bryd. A'r pryder ychwanegol hefyd, wrth gwrs - hwyrach eich bod chi wedi dod ar ei draws - ydy bod awdurdodau lleol yn poeni bod pwyllgorau corfforaethol hefyd yn mynd i dynnu i mewn adrannau addysg. Allwch chi, felly, roi gwarant i mi heddiw na fydd addysg yn cael ei dynnu i mewn i bwyllgorau corfforaethol ar y cyd, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: Thank you. Two further questions from me, then. Further to this discussion on the CJCs, the Public Accounts Committee of the previous Senedd looked at this plethora of joint committees that local authorities have to participate in. Twenty years ago, the Government here and your party celebrated the bonfire of the quangos, but, in terms of local authorities, you're almost recreating these quangoistic organisations that local authorities have to participate in. The joint committees are the latest of these, but there are the public services boards, the regional partnership boards, and the other bodies where local authorities have to collaborate. Don't you feel that there are too many of these at the moment and that you therefore need to take a step back and enable local authorities to deliver against their responsibilities rather than building new relationships constantly and reinventing the wheel, which is adding to the workload?
Welsh: Oce, diolch yn fawr iawn. Dau gwestiwn arall sydd gen i cyn fy mod i'n gorffen. Ymhellach i'r drafodaeth yma ar bwyllgorau corfforaethol, felly, ddaru'r Public Accounts Committee yn y Senedd ddiwethaf, dwi'n meddwl, edrych ar y plethora yma o bwyllgorau ar y cyd y mae awdurdodau lleol yn gorfod eu mynychu a chymryd rhan ynddyn nhw. Ugain mlynedd yn ôl, roedd y Llywodraeth yma a'ch plaid chi yn dathlu bonfire of the quangos, a dwi'n teimlo, o ran awdurdodau lleol, bron eich bod chi'n ail-greu rhyw gyrff bach cwangoaidd y mae angen i awdurdodau lleol gymryd rhan ynddyn nhw. Y pwyllgorau corfforaethol ydy'r diweddaraf, ond mae byrddau gwasanaethau cyhoeddus, wrth gwrs, byrddau partneriaeth rhanbarthol, ac yna gyrff eraill lle mae angen i awdurdodau lleol gyfuno. Ydych chi ddim yn teimlo bod yna ormod ohonyn nhw ar hyn o bryd ac felly bod angen cymryd cam yn ôl a galluogi awdurdodau lleol i ganolbwyntio ar y gwaith mewn llaw y maen nhw'n gorfod ei ddelifro yn hytrach nag adeiladu perthnasau newydd drwy'r amser ac ail-greu'r olwyn, sy'n ychwanegu at fwrdwn gwaith?
English: Thank you very much for that, Reg, for that. And finally from me - and I apologise for taking so much of the committee's time - a slightly different question this time. We've seen, this summer and last summer, an increase in tourism, which has benefits in terms of the local economy, and we're seeing people coming into our communities and enjoying what we have to offer. That's been excellent in many ways, but it's also placed additional pressures on local authorities. If you look at the number of cars queuing, to go up Snowdon, and parking on the side of the roads, bringing additional costs for local authorities in enforcing parking regulations, and the number of seasonal toilets that they've had to provide in order to cope with the number of visitors. There are significant costs in addressing these issues. So, what have you done to support some of these authorities that have seen additional costs placed upon them in dealing with the level of visitors over the past two summers?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Reg, am yr ychwanegiad yna. Yn olaf gen i, os caf i, Gadeirydd - mae'n flin gen i gymryd cymaint o amser - gwestiwn ychydig yn wahanol. Rydyn ni wedi gweld, yr haf yma a'r haf diwethaf, twristiaeth ar gynnydd, sydd yn arbennig o ran yr economi leol, gweld cynnydd mewn pobl yn aros yn lleol - pobl yn dod i mewn i'n cymunedau ac yn mwynhau'r hyn sydd gyda ni i'w gynnig. Mae hynny wedi bod yn wych mewn amryw o ffyrdd, ond mae hefyd wedi golygu pwysau ychwanegol ar awdurdodau lleol. Os ydych chi'n meddwl am, er enghraifft, niferoedd y ceir sydd yn ciwio, i fynd i fyny'r Wyddfa, ac yn parcio ar ochr y ffordd, a'r costau ychwanegol yna sydd gan yr awdurdodau lleol er mwyn sicrhau nad ydyn nhw'n parcio yno, a nifer y toiledau tymhorol ychwanegol maen nhw wedi gorfod eu rhoi ymlaen er mwyn ymdopi gyda'r bobl sydd ar eu gwyliau - costau sylweddol er mwyn mynd i'r afael â hyn. Beth ydych chi wedi'i wneud i gynorthwyo rhai o'r awdurdodau yma sydd wedi gorfod mynd i gostau ychwanegol er mwyn medru dygymod â'r cynnydd yn lefel yr ymwelwyr dros y ddau haf diwethaf?
English: Good afternoon. Welcome, everyone, to the Plenary session. Before we begin, I want to set out a few points. This meeting will be held in a hybrid format, with some Members in the Senedd Chamber and others joining by video-conference. All Members participating in proceedings of the Senedd, wherever they may be, will be treated equitably. A Plenary meeting held using video-conference, in accordance with the Standing Orders of the Welsh Parliament, constitutes Senedd proceedings for the purposes of the Government of Wales Act 2006. Some of the provisions of Standing Order 34 will apply for today's Plenary meeting, and these are noted on your agenda. I would like to remind all Members that Standing Orders relating to order in Plenary meetings apply to this meeting, and apply equally to Members in the Siambr and those joining virtually. Before we move to the first item, it is my pleasure the announce of the first Member Bill ballot of the sixth Senedd which was held today. I'm pleased to announce that Peter Fox may seek the Senedd's agreement on his proposal for a food (Wales) Bill. So, congratulations to you, Peter Fox, and I wish you well in promoting this particular Bill.
Welsh: Prynhawn da. Croeso, bawb, i'r Cyfarfod Llawn. Cyn i ni ddechrau, dwi angen nodi ychydig o bwyntiau. Cynhelir y cyfarfod hwn ar ffurf hybrid, gyda rhai Aelodau yn y Siambr ac eraill yn ymuno drwy gyswllt fideo. Bydd yr holl Aelodau sy'n cymryd rhan yn nhrafodion y Senedd, ble bynnag y bônt, yn cael eu trin yn gyfartal. Mae Cyfarfod Llawn a gynhelir drwy gynhadledd fideo, yn unol â Rheolau Sefydlog Senedd Cymru, yn gyfystyr â thrafodion y Senedd at ddibenion Deddf Llywodraeth Cymru 2006. Bydd rhai o ddarpariaethau Rheol Sefydlog 34 yn gymwys ar gyfer y Cyfarfod Llawn heddiw, ac mae'r rheini wedi'u nodi ar eich agenda chi. Dwi eisiau atgoffa'r Aelodau fod y Rheolau Sefydlog sy'n ymwneud â threfn yn y cyfarfod yma yn berthnasol i'r cyfarfod yma, ac yr un mor berthnasol i'r Aelodau yn y Siambr ag i'r rhai sy'n ymuno drwy gyswllt fideo. Cyn symud i'r eitem gyntaf, dwi eisiau cyhoeddi canlyniad balot cyntaf y chweched Senedd ar gyfer Bil Aelod a gynhaliwyd heddiw. Mae'n bleser gen i gyhoeddi y gall Peter Fox ofyn i'r Senedd am gytundeb y Senedd ar y cynnig ar gyfer Bil bwyd (Cymru). Felly, llongyfarchiadau i Peter Fox, a phob dymuniad da i chi wrth hyrwyddo y Mesur yma.
English: The first item on our agenda this afternoon is questions to the Minister for Social Justice, and the first question is to be asked by Jayne Bryant.
Welsh: Yr eitem gyntaf, felly, ar ein hagenda ni y prynhawn yma yw'r cwestiynau i'r Gweinidog Cyfiawnder Cymdeithasol, ac mae'r cwestiwn cyntaf i'w ofyn gan Jayne Bryant.
English: The Welsh Government is committed to continuing and building upon the support and services provided for our veterans in Wales. Our work and continued progress are highlighted in our third armed forces covenant annual report, which was published on 22 June.
Welsh: Mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ymrwymo i barhau ac adeiladu ar y cymorth a'r gwasanaethau a ddarperir i'n cyn-filwyr yng Nghymru. Ceir manylion ynglŷn â'n gwaith a'n cynnydd parhaus yn ein trydydd adroddiad blynyddol ar gyfamod y lluoedd arfog, a gyhoeddwyd ar 22 Mehefin.
English: Thank you for that answer, Deputy Minister. We owe a debt of gratitude and our support to the men and women in our armed forces. Recent events in Afghanistan will have brought back difficult feelings for those who have served there and their families. There are groups in my constituency, such as the Newport armed forces and veterans breakfast club and the Newport Veterans Hub, who provide mutual support. On top of their usual support in helping veterans, I know that the veterans hub have arranged for open sessions with clinical therapists to help those who have found the events of the last few months difficult. They have also provided a peer support scheme to connect veterans with one another to share experiences and offer mutual support. Awareness of these support networks is crucial. How can the Welsh Government help to link up veterans and their families to support that is available to ensure that we are there for them as they have been for us?
Welsh: Diolch am eich ateb, Ddirprwy Weinidog. Mae arnom ddiolch a chefnogaeth i'r dynion a'r menywod yn ein lluoedd arfog. Bydd y digwyddiadau diweddar yn Affganistan wedi ail-greu teimladau anodd i'r rheini a fu'n gwasanaethu yno a'u teuluoedd. Mae grwpiau yn fy etholaeth i, fel clwb brecwast y lluoedd arfog a chyn-filwyr Casnewydd a Hwb Cyn-filwyr Casnewydd, yn darparu cymorth cymheiriaid. Yn ychwanegol at eu cymorth arferol i helpu cyn-filwyr, gwn fod yr hwb cyn-filwyr wedi trefnu sesiynau agored gyda therapyddion clinigol i helpu'r rheini y bu'r ychydig fisoedd diwethaf yn anodd iddynt. Maent hefyd wedi darparu cynllun cymorth gan gymheiriaid i gysylltu cyn-filwyr â'i gilydd er mwyn rhannu profiadau a chynnig cymorth i'w gilydd. Mae ymwybyddiaeth o'r rhwydweithiau cymorth hyn yn hanfodol. Sut y gall Llywodraeth Cymru helpu i gysylltu cyn-filwyr a'u teuluoedd â'r cymorth sydd ar gael er mwyn sicrhau ein bod yno ar eu cyfer fel y maent hwy wedi bod yno ar ein cyfer ninnau?