techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: [Continues.] - and the actual park that you are talking about delivering is a potential of 1,500 jobs with a 10-year delivery programme for that park. So, there is a dislocate. But the point I am driving at here, First Minister, is that you have the permanent secretary in that department at complete loggerheads with the Cabinet Secretary in his interpretation. The evidence is there, from the Public Accounts Committee, of this project - and, again, I repeat, a very high-impact project. So that is finance, that is jobs, that is regeneration. Otherwise, why would he have used such language? Do you have confidence in James Price's ability to continue within his role or are you backing the Cabinet Secretary? [Interruption.]
Welsh: [Yn parhau.] - ac mae'r parc yr ydych chi'n sôn am ei ddarparu â photensial o 1,500 o swyddi gyda rhaglen gyflawni 10 mlynedd ar gyfer y parc hwnnw. Felly, ceir anghysondeb. Ond y pwynt rwy'n ceisio ei wneud yma, Prif Weinidog, yw bod gennych chi'r ysgrifennydd parhaol yn yr adran honno sydd yn gwbl groes i'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet yn ei ddehongliad. Mae'r dystiolaeth yno, gan y Pwyllgor Cyfrifon Cyhoeddus, am y prosiect hwn - ac, unwaith eto, rwy'n ailadrodd, prosiect ag effaith fawr iawn. Felly mae hynny'n gyllid, mae hynny'n swyddi, mae hynny'n adfywio. Fel arall, pam fyddai ef wedi defnyddio iaith o'r fath? A oes gennych chi ffydd yng ngallu James Price i barhau yn ei swydd neu a ydych chi'n cefnogi Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet? [Torri ar draws.]
English: It is, frankly, cowardice - cowardice - for any Member in this Chamber to name a civil servant in that way when they cannot respond. It is cowardice. I ask the leader of the Welsh Conservatives to withdraw it. [Interruption.]
Welsh: Mae'n llwfrdra, a bod yn blaen - llwfrdra - i unrhyw Aelod yn y Siambr hon enwi gwas sifil fel yna pan na all ymateb. Mae'n llwfrdra. Gofynnaf i arweinydd y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig ei dynnu yn ôl. [Torri ar draws.]
English: I would like to reply to that, because when you accuse someone of cowardice -
Welsh: Hoffwn ymateb i hynna, oherwydd pan fyddwch chi'n cyhuddo rhywun o lwfrdra -
English: No, no, I think it is -
Welsh: Na, na, rwy'n credu ei fod -
English: That is out of order to call someone a coward.
Welsh: Nid yw'n dderbyniol galw rhywun yn llwfrgi.
English: [Continues.] - probably inappropriate for you to be naming a civil servant in this place when that civil servant is not able to be here to answer for himself. [Interruption.] So, I'm going to move on now and call the leader of UKIP, Neil Hamilton.
Welsh: [Yn parhau.] - yn ôl pob tebyg yn amhriodol i chi fod yn enwi gwas sifil yn y lle hwn pan nad yw'r gwas sifil yn gallu bod yma i ateb drosto'i hun. [Torri ar draws.] Felly, rwy'n mynd i symud ymlaen nawr a galw ar arweinydd UKIP, Neil Hamilton.
English: We're not going to move on very far, Llywydd, I'm afraid, because I'm going to continue the line of questioning by the leader of the Welsh Conservatives. Isn't it now absolutely clear why this decision has been delayed until after the general election? And what the Welsh Government has done today is actually to kill the hopes of the people of Blaenau Gwent and a much wider area. There is nothing that the Government was able to discuss this morning that couldn't have been discussed weeks ago. There's nothing new at all in this decision. The limit of the Welsh Government's obligations would be a maximum of £8 million a year for 33 years - that's once all the buildings on the site were constructed. It's not so the whole thing would be telescoped upfront and the money would have to be found tomorrow or within the next three years. Therefore, what this shows is a pathetic lack of vision on the part of the Welsh Government to kill this massive private enterprise scheme, which offered not just hope to one town in Wales, but actually to the whole of south-east Wales.
Welsh: Nid ydym ni'n mynd i symud ymlaen yn bell iawn, Llywydd, mae gen i ofn, gan fy mod i'n mynd i barhau â'r un math o gwestiynu ag a oedd gan arweinydd y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig. Onid yw'n gwbl eglur nawr pam mae'r penderfyniad hwn wedi cael ei ohirio tan ar ôl yr etholiad cyffredinol? A'r hyn y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ei wneud heddiw mewn gwirionedd yw lladd gobeithion pobl Blaenau Gwent ac ardal llawer ehangach. Nid oes unrhyw beth yr oedd y Llywodraeth yn gallu ei drafod y bore yma na ellid bod wedi ei drafod wythnosau yn ôl. Nid oes dim byd newydd o gwbl yn y penderfyniad hwn. Cyfyngiad ymrwymiadau Llywodraeth Cymru fyddai uchafswm o £8 miliwn y flwyddyn am 33 mlynedd - mae hynny ar ôl adeiladu'r holl adeiladau ar y safle. Nid yw fel pe byddai'r holl beth yn gorfod cael ei dalu ar y cychwyn ac y byddai'n rhaid dod o hyd i'r arian yfory neu yn ystod y tair blynedd nesaf. Felly, yr hyn y mae hyn yn ei ddangos yw diffyg gweledigaeth sobr ar ran Llywodraeth Cymru i ladd y cynllun menter breifat enfawr hwn, a oedd yn cynnig gobaith nid yn unig i un dref yng Nghymru, ond i'r de-ddwyrain gyfan mewn gwirionedd.
English: It's difficult to be lectured by somebody who was part of the Conservative administration that closed down, actually, the very last mine, for example - the Marine/Six Bells in Blaenau Gwent - and was more than happy to do so. I mean, really, I can't take what he says in that regard seriously. The reason why the decision couldn't be taken at the time he mentions is because the due diligence process hadn't finished. Or is he suggesting that decisions should be taken before all the information is ready? That is reckless, to say the least. He fails to understand what is behind this project. The jobs were in the technology park, not in the circuit. The circuit only provided to the region about 137 full-time jobs. That's it. The rest of it - the thousands of jobs - were always going to be in the technology park and beyond, and that is exactly what we're going to invest in as a Government. He's also wrong to say that this is simply £8 million over the next 33 years. We know, having explored this with the Office for National Statistics, who would refer this to Eurostat, that there's a very high risk of this guarantee being regarded as being on the balance sheet. That means we would lose £373 million of capital funding, and £157 million would have to be found this financial year. That is, schools not being built, hospitals not being modernised, houses not being built. Now, surely, he has to accept that that high risk cannot be ignored.
Welsh: Mae'n anodd derbyn pregeth gan rywun a oedd yn rhan o'r weinyddiaeth Geidwadol a wnaeth gau, mewn gwirionedd, y pwll glo olaf un, er enghraifft - y Marnie/Six Bells ym Mlaenau Gwent - ac a oedd yn fwy na pharod i wneud hynny. Hynny yw, o ddifrif, ni allaf gymryd yr hyn y mae'n ei ddweud yn hynny o beth o ddifrif. Y rheswm pam na allai'r penderfyniad gael ei wneud ar yr adeg y mae'n sôn amdani yw oherwydd nad oedd y broses diwydrwydd dyladwy wedi dod i ben. Neu a yw'n awgrymu y dylai penderfyniadau gael eu gwneud cyn bod yr holl wybodaeth yn barod? Mae hynny'n fyrbwyll, a dweud y lleiaf. Nid yw'n deall beth sydd y tu ôl i'r prosiect hwn. Yn y parc technoleg oedd y swyddi, nid yn y gylchffordd. Roedd y gylchffordd yn darparu tua 137 o swyddi llawn amser yn unig. Dyna'r cwbl. Roedd y gweddill - y miloedd o swyddi - bob amser yn mynd i fod yn y parc technoleg a thu hwnt, a dyna'n union yr ydym ni'n mynd i fuddsoddi ynddo fel Llywodraeth. Mae hefyd yn anghywir i ddweud mai dim ond £8 miliwn dros y 33 mlynedd nesaf yw hyn. Rydym ni'n gwybod, ar ôl archwilio hyn gyda'r Swyddfa Ystadegau Gwladol, a fyddai'n cyfeirio'r hyn at Eurostat, bod risg uchel iawn y byddai'r warant hon yn cael ei hystyried fel bod ar y fantolen. Mae hynny'n golygu y byddem ni'n colli £373 miliwn o gyllid cyfalaf, ac y byddai'n rhaid dod o hyd i £157 miliwn yn y flwyddyn ariannol hon. Hynny yw, ysgolion ddim yn cael eu hadeiladu, ysbytai ddim yn cael eu moderneiddio, tai ddim yn cael eu hadeiladu. Nawr, does bosib nad oes rhaid iddo dderbyn na ellir anwybyddu'r risg uchel honno.
English: Well, what we're talking about here is a bean-counters convention. [Interruption.] It is nothing new. We knew in advance of the decision being taken, months and months ago, what the ONS rules and Treasury rules on how to treat long-term spending of this kind were. So, this is something that could have been decided a very long time ago. Why has the Welsh Government allowed this project to limp along for six years when that could have been recognised right from the start? What we need to do here, surely, is to change the accounting convention rather than just destroy the hopes of those who were relying upon regenerating the whole of south-east Wales. Because if it is the case that it is only the rules of the Office for National Statistics and Her Majesty's Treasury in London that have killed this project, then that is an absolute disgrace.
Welsh: Wel, yr hyn yr ydym ni'n sôn amdano yma yw confensiwn cyfrifwyr ffa. [Torri ar draws.] Nid yw'n ddim byd newydd. Roeddem ni'n gwybod cyn i'r penderfyniad gael ei wneud, misoedd ar fisoedd yn ôl, beth oedd rheolau'r SYG a rheolau'r Trysorlys ar sut i drin gwariant hirdymor o'r math hwn. Felly, mae hyn yn rhywbeth a allai fod wedi cael ei benderfynu amser maith yn ôl. Pam mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi caniatáu i'r prosiect hwn hercian yn ei flaen am chwe blynedd pan allai hynny fod wedi cael ei gydnabod o'r cychwyn cyntaf? Yr hyn y mae angen i ni ei wneud yma, does bosib, yw newid y confensiwn cyfrifyddu yn hytrach na dim ond dinistrio gobeithion y rheini a oedd yn dibynnu ar adfywio de-ddwyrain Cymru gyfan. Oherwydd os yw'n wir mai dim ond rheolau'r Swyddfa Ystadegau Gwladol a Thrysorlys Ei Mawrhydi yn Llundain sydd wedi lladd y prosiect hwn, yna mae hynny'n warth llwyr.
English: We can't change the rules. The rules are set by ONS. They are independent of Government, and they set rules in conjunction with Eurostat. We have to be aware of what that risk might entail. He calls it a bean-counters convention. The risk is far greater than that. If we end up with £373 million on our books, that means it's capital money we cannot spend. Surely he will understand - he's been in Government, so surely he understands this - he will know that that is a risk that any Government must take seriously. He asks the question as to why this wasn't identified before. This was part of the conditions. The conditions stipulated 50:50. The conditions haven't been met. That's why it's a problem.
Welsh: Ni allwn newid y rheolau. Mae'r rheolau'n cael eu pennu gan y SYG. Maen nhw'n annibynnol ar y Llywodraeth, ac maen nhw'n pennu'r rheolau ar y cyd ag Eurostat. Mae'n rhaid i ni fod yn ymwybodol o'r hyn y gallai'r risg honno ei olygu. Mae'n ei alw'n gonfensiwn cyfrifwyr ffa. Mae'r risg yn llawer mwy na hynny. Os bydd gennym ni £373 miliwn ar ein llyfrau yn y pen draw, mae hynny'n golygu ei fod yn arian cyfalaf na allwn ei wario. Does bosib nad yw'n deall - mae e wedi bod mewn Llywodraeth, felly does bosib nad yw'n deall hyn - bydd yn gwybod bod honno'n risg y mae'n rhaid i unrhyw Lywodraeth ei chymryd o ddifrif. Mae'n gofyn y cwestiwn ynghylch pam na nodwyd hyn o'r blaen. Roedd hyn yn rhan o'r amodau. Roedd yr amodau yn nodi 50:50. Nid yw'r amodau wedi eu bodloni. Dyna pam mae'n broblem.
English: All the money that is going to be provided upfront to build the Circuit of Wales is private sector money. All that the Welsh Government's being asked to do is to guarantee payments that will be made to the senior bondholders for less than half the capital employed, in a period that only starts when the whole site has been developed. So, there are physical assets then, against which the contingent liability of the Government would be secured. What we have now is a proposal from the Government to spend £100 million over 10 years - shed loads of money - on a series of empty sheds.
Welsh: Mae'r holl arian sy'n mynd i gael ei ddarparu ymlaen llaw i adeiladu Cylchffordd Cymru yn arian sector preifat. Y cwbl y gofynnir i Lywodraeth Cymru ei wneud yw gwarantu taliadau a fydd yn cael eu gwneud i'r deiliaid bondiau uwch am lai na hanner y cyfalaf a ddefnyddir, mewn cyfnod sy'n dechrau dim ond pan fydd y safle cyfan wedi cael ei ddatblygu. Felly, bydd asedau ffisegol wedyn, y byddai rhwymedigaeth wrth gefn y Llywodraeth wedi ei gwarantu yn eu herbyn. Yr hyn sydd gennym ni nawr yw cynnig gan y Llywodraeth i wario £100 miliwn dros 10 mlynedd - llawer iawn o arian - ar gyfres o siediau gwag.
English: We have already assessed the demand and spoken to businesses. We know there is a demand for premises in the Heads of the Valleys, and we know that there are businesses who cannot move there because the premises aren't there. So, it's hugely important to make sure that we provide those premises as part of the technology park that is part of the circuit itself. The only thing, in many ways, that's missing is the actual racetrack. The jobs - the vast majority of the jobs - are still there. He is not being honest with himself when he says that this is only about a guarantee. He knows full well that if £373 million are re-profiled so they appear on our books, we lose the money. It's the same as a cut. It means we would have to find £157 million in this financial year. The problem we have is that we have pursued this with ONS and with Eurostat - with ONS - and their answer is, 'We cannot give you a definitive ruling until we've seen the final contracts.' It's too late by then. That's the problem. So the real risk here is that we end up not moving ahead with projects in-year that people have already been promised because of, yes, an accountancy device, but one nevertheless that the ONS have identified, and one that carries a high risk.
Welsh: Rydym ni eisoes wedi asesu'r galw ac wedi siarad â busnesau. Rydym ni'n gwybod bod galw am safleoedd ym Mlaenau'r Cymoedd, a gwyddom fod busnesau na allant symud yno gan nad yw'r adeiladau yno. Felly, mae'n hynod bwysig gwneud yn siŵr ein bod ni'n darparu'r adeiladau hynny yn rhan o'r parc technoleg sy'n rhan o'r gylchffordd ei hun. Yr unig beth, mewn sawl ffordd, sydd ar goll yw'r trac rasio ei hun. Mae'r swyddi - y mwyafrif llethol o'r swyddi - yn dal i fod yno. Nid yw'n bod yn onest gydag ef ei hun pan fo'n dweud bod hyn yn ymwneud â gwarant yn unig. Mae'n gwybod yn iawn, os bydd £373 miliwn yn cael ei ail-broffilio fel eu bod yn ymddangos ar ein llyfrau, ein bod ni'n colli'r arian. Mae yr un fath â thoriad. Mae'n golygu y byddai'n rhaid i ni ddod o hyd i £157 miliwn yn y flwyddyn ariannol hon. Y broblem sydd gennym ni yw ein bod ni wedi mynd ar drywydd hyn gyda'r SYG a chyda Eurostat - gyda'r SYG - a'u hateb nhw yw, 'Ni allwn roi dyfarniad terfynol i chi tan y byddwn ni wedi gweld y contractau terfynol.' Mae'n rhy hwyr erbyn hynny. Dyna'r broblem. Felly, y risg wirioneddol yn y fan yma yw na fyddwn ni'n symud ymlaen yn y pen draw â phrosiectau yn ystod y flwyddyn a addawyd i bobl eisoes oherwydd, ie, dyfais gyfrifyddu, ond un serch hynny y mae'r SYG wedi ei nodi, ac un y mae risg uchel yn gysylltiedig ag ef.
English: Diolch. I think you do have some further questions to answer about this, but I understand there's an urgent question coming later, so I'd like to ask you about another aspect of the economy, and that is in relation to education and skills. Many concerns have been expressed to me by teachers about their workload, and, linked to that, growing sickness rates. Many people are considering leaving the profession now. Initial teacher training levels have been described as bordering on crisis. Do you agree?
Welsh: Diolch. Rwy'n credu bod gennych chi rai cwestiynau pellach i'w hateb am hyn, ond rwy'n deall bod cwestiwn brys yn dod yn ddiweddarach, felly hoffwn eich holi am agwedd arall ar yr economi, ac mae hynny'n ymwneud ag addysg a sgiliau. Mynegwyd llawer o bryderon i mi gan athrawon am eu llwyth gwaith, ac, yn gysylltiedig â hynny, cyfraddau salwch cynyddol. Mae llawer o bobl yn ystyried gadael y proffesiwn nawr. Dywedwyd fod lefelau hyfforddiant athrawon cychwynnol yn ymylu ar argyfwng. A ydych chi'n cytuno?
English: No, I don't. I think there are great opportunities for us when pay and conditions are devolved to put in place a holistic package for teachers to make sure that the responsibilities they have are reflected in terms of the pay that they receive. It has always been a strange anomaly that we have responsibility for education, but not for pay and conditions. That is at the heart of delivering a good deal for teachers, and that's what we intend to do.
Welsh: Nac ydw. Rwy'n meddwl bod cyfleoedd gwych i ni, pan fydd tâl ac amodau wedi eu datganoli, i sefydlu pecyn cyfannol i athrawon i wneud yn siŵr bod y cyfrifoldebau sydd ganddynt yn cael eu hadlewyrchu o ran y cyflog y maen nhw'n ei gael. Mae wedi bod yn anghysondeb rhyfedd erioed bod gennym ni gyfrifoldeb am addysg, ond nid am dâl ac amodau. Mae hynny wrth wraidd darparu cytundeb da i athrawon, a dyna'r ydym ni'n bwriadu ei wneud.
English: Well, perhaps if you'd had unity on the question of devolving pay and conditions within your own party before now, we might have got somewhere with that. But I'm concerned about your refusal to face reality. I'm not really surprised, but I am concerned. First Minister, the words I used, 'crisis', were not my own words. They were the words used by the National Union of Teachers. Back in April, Plaid Cymru warned that teacher recruitment was heading for a perfect storm. We are now in the middle of that storm. The secondary school intake for trainee teachers has dropped a third below the target. That target is based on need - the number of teachers we need in our system. There's now a gap of around 280 secondary school teachers, and intake for primary school teachers has also now dropped below the target. We know from the Education Workforce Council that one third of teachers intend to leave the profession within the next three years. First Minister, in March, changes to teacher training were announced. How long is it going to take for those changes to stop this downward trend?
Welsh: Wel, efallai pe byddai gennych chi undod ar y cwestiwn o ddatganoli tâl ac amodau o fewn eich plaid eich hun cyn hyn, y byddem ni wedi gwneud rhywfaint o gynnydd yn hynny o beth. Ond rwy'n pryderu am eich amharodrwydd i wynebu realiti. Nid wyf yn synnu, ond rwy'n pryderu. Prif Weinidog, nid fy ngeiriau i oedd y geiriau, 'argyfwng' a ddefnyddiais. Y rhain oedd y geiriau a ddefnyddiwyd gan Undeb Cenedlaethol yr Athrawon. Yn ôl ym mis Ebrill, rhybuddiodd Plaid Cymru bod recriwtio athrawon yn mynd i gyfeiriad storm berffaith. Rydym ni yng nghanol y storm honno erbyn hyn. Mae derbyniadau ysgol uwchradd o athrawon dan hyfforddiant wedi gostwng draean yn is na'r targed. Mae'r targed hwnnw'n seiliedig ar angen - nifer yr athrawon sydd eu hangen arnom yn ein system. Ceir bwlch o tua 280 o athrawon ysgol uwchradd erbyn hyn, ac mae derbyniadau athrawon ysgol gynradd wedi gostwng yn is na'r targed hefyd erbyn hyn. Rydym ni'n gwybod gan Gyngor y Gweithlu Addysg bod traean o athrawon yn bwriadu gadael y proffesiwn yn ystod y tair blynedd nesaf. Prif Weinidog, ym mis Mawrth, cyhoeddwyd newidiadau i hyfforddiant athrawon. Faint o amser mae'n mynd i'w gymryd i'r newidiadau hynny atal y duedd am i lawr hon?
English: I don't think it would be possible to put in place the right package until pay and conditions are devolved. Why? Well, people want to know what their terms of employment are, what their conditions of employment are, what they'll be paid, and what activities they'll be paid for. That all impacts, clearly, on a decision to go into a profession and that impacts, ultimately, on numbers. Now, next year, we'll have the opportunity and the responsibility of controlling teachers' pay and conditions. We want to work with the teaching unions to make sure we put forward a package that makes teaching more attractive than perhaps it has been for some people in the past, but getting control of pay and conditions is absolutely crucial for that.
Welsh: Nid wyf yn credu y byddai'n bosibl cyflwyno'r pecyn cywir tan fod cyflogau ac amodau wedi eu datganoli. Pam? Wel, mae pobl eisiau gwybod beth yw eu telerau cyflogaeth, beth yw eu hamodau cyflogaeth, faint y byddant yn cael eu talu, a pha weithgareddau y byddant yn cael eu talu amdanynt. Mae hynny i gyd yn effeithio, yn amlwg, ar benderfyniad i ymuno â phroffesiwn ac mae hynny, yn y pen draw, yn effeithio ar niferoedd. Nawr, y flwyddyn nesaf, bydd gennym ni'r cyfle a'r cyfrifoldeb o reoli tâl ac amodau athrawon. Rydym ni eisiau gweithio gyda'r undebau athrawon i wneud yn siŵr ein bod ni'n cyflwyno pecyn sy'n gwneud addysgu yn fwy deniadol nag efallai y mae wedi bod i rai pobl yn y gorffennol, ond mae cael rheolaeth o dâl ac amodau yn gwbl hanfodol ar gyfer hynny.
English: So, you're kicking it off again into the future then. The situation, First Minister, is worse than you are prepared to admit. The overall number of trainee teachers has dropped every single year since 2011, and the correspondence and conversations that I've had with teachers show that there is a deep problem here. From your answer, I'm not convinced at all that you've got plans to treat this situation with any sense of urgency. What I want to see is our teaching profession supported. Why don't you talk to teachers and their trade unions and ask them what can be done in the immediate term to help with their workload and their mental well-being? You're putting things in place now, which may well pay off in the future, but that decline in numbers has been evident for several years now. It's not a new problem. The crisis is here, and the crisis is now. You've previously admitted that you took your eye off the ball in education, and at that point in time you indicated that your Government would up its game. Since you've made that admission in education, what exactly have you been doing?
Welsh: Felly, rydych chi'n ei gicio i ffwrdd i'r dyfodol eto. Mae'r sefyllfa, Prif Weinidog, yn waeth nag yr ydych chi'n barod i gyfaddef. Mae cyfanswm yr athrawon dan hyfforddiant wedi gostwng ym mhob un blwyddyn ers 2011, ac mae'r ohebiaeth a'r sgyrsiau yr wyf i wedi eu cael gydag athrawon yn dangos bod problem ddwys yn y fan yma. O'ch ateb, nid wyf wedi fy argyhoeddi o gwbl bod gennych chi gynlluniau i drin y sefyllfa hon gydag unrhyw syniad o frys. Yr hyn yr wyf i eisiau ei weld yw ein proffesiwn addysgu yn cael ei gefnogi. Pam na wnewch chi siarad ag athrawon a'u hundebau llafur a gofyn iddyn nhw beth y gellir ei wneud yn y tymor byr i helpu gyda'u llwyth gwaith a'u llesiant meddyliol? Rydych chi'n rhoi pethau ar waith nawr, y mae'n bosibl y byddant yn talu ar eu canfed yn y dyfodol, ond mae'r gostyngiad yna i niferoedd wedi bod yn amlwg ers sawl blwyddyn bellach. Nid yw'n broblem newydd. Mae'r argyfwng wedi cyrraedd, ac mae'r argyfwng nawr. Rydych chi wedi cyfaddef yn y gorffennol eich bod chi wedi cymryd eich llygad oddi ar y bêl o ran addysg, a dywedasoch bryd hynny y byddai eich Llywodraeth yn gwella ei pherfformiad. Gan eich bod chi wedi gwneud y cyfaddefiad hwnnw o ran addysg, beth yn union ydych chi wedi bod yn ei wneud?