English: Well, that's an important question from the Member. The reason that the trade levels are so low are because of the pattern of trade in terms of our red meat exports with the European Union, which means that 90 per cent of our lamb exports end up in the European Union, for example, and that is as a result of farmers in Wales making a perfectly rational decision to export to one of the largest markets in the world that is right on their doorstep. As I say, that's a perfectly rational economic decision. I would have thought they were probably assuming the UK Government would make perfectly rational economic decisions as well, which obviously they aren't making in this particular context. I know that she will join with me in regretting the remarks of Liz Truss, for example, which appeared to criticise Welsh farmers for putting their eggs in one basket. If Welsh farmers' interests are not protected in the context of these negotiations, that will not be their fault; it will be the fault of the UK Government. In the context of trade agreements with other countries, we absolutely welcome any opportunity to enhance the markets available for Welsh farmers. There is no question about that. We will support food producers, we will support exporters in any way that we can, and we do that already of course. But the reality of the situation is that the contribution that those markets will make to the exports will be significantly smaller for basic economic reasons than the current level of exports to the EU. That's not to say we shouldn't pursue those opportunities - we should and we are, but I think there needs to be a sense of reality about the capacity of those agreements to replicate even a fraction of the trade that would be lost with the European Union.
Welsh: Wel, mae hwnnw'n gwestiwn pwysig gan yr Aelod. Y rheswm pam fod y lefelau masnach mor isel yw oherwydd y patrwm masnachu o ran ein hallforion cig coch gyda'r Undeb Ewropeaidd, sy'n golygu bod 90 y cant o'n hallforion cig oen yn cyrraedd yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, er enghraifft, ac mae hynny o ganlyniad i ffermwyr yng Nghymru yn gwneud penderfyniad cwbl resymegol i allforio i un o'r marchnadoedd mwyaf yn y byd sydd ar garreg eu drws. Fel y dywedais, mae hwnnw'n benderfyniad economaidd cwbl resymegol. Byddwn wedi meddwl eu bod yn tybio yn ôl pob tebyg y byddai Llywodraeth y DU yn gwneud penderfyniadau economaidd cwbl resymegol hefyd, ac mae'n amlwg nad ydynt yn gwneud hynny yn y cyd-destun penodol hwn. Gwn y bydd hi'n ymuno â mi i resynu at sylwadau Liz Truss, er enghraifft, a oedd fel pe bai'n beirniadu ffermwyr Cymru am roi eu hwyau mewn un fasged. Os na chaiff buddiannau ffermwyr Cymru eu diogelu yng nghyd-destun y trafodaethau hyn, nid eu bai hwy fydd hynny; Llywodraeth y DU fydd ar fai. Yng nghyd-destun cytundebau masnach â gwledydd eraill, rydym yn llwyr groesawu unrhyw gyfle i wella'r marchnadoedd sydd ar gael i ffermwyr Cymru. Nid oes amheuaeth am hynny. Byddwn yn cefnogi cynhyrchwyr bwyd, byddwn yn cefnogi allforwyr mewn unrhyw ffordd y gallwn, ac rydym eisoes yn gwneud hynny wrth gwrs. Ond realiti'r sefyllfa yw y bydd y cyfraniad y bydd y marchnadoedd hynny'n ei wneud i'r allforion gryn dipyn yn llai am resymau economaidd sylfaenol na'r lefel bresennol o allforion i'r UE. Nid yw hynny'n golygu na ddylem fynd ar drywydd y cyfleoedd hynny - dylem wneud hynny ac rydym yn gwneud hynny, ond credaf fod angen ymdeimlad o realiti ynglŷn â gallu'r cytundebau hynny i gymryd lle y tamaid lleiaf hyd yn oed o'r fasnach a fyddai'n cael ei cholli gyda'r Undeb Ewropeaidd.