techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. Thank you very much for the very warm welcome and, with your indulgence, I will pass on my thanks to all Members from across this Chamber and beyond who've sent best wishes to me, in particular the personal note the First Minister wrote to me - it was greatly appreciated - along with other Ministers as well. We can give no quarter yield in this Chamber, but when we get outside this Chamber we are all human beings, and that support was greatly appreciated, to say the least. I went out of this Chamber in September 19.5 stone; I am now 17.5 stone. So, there's two stone less of Welsh beef in this Chamber today. [ Laughter.] But back to the business at hand, this is First Minister's questions. I'd like to ask you, First Minister, around primary health care and, in particular, last week's comments from the British Medical Association that said that something had to give with the booster roll-out in other services, and the health Minister agreed with the provision that most probably there would have to be a curtailment in those provisions, in doctors' surgeries in particular. Other Governments in the UK have made an announcement over the weekend. Are you in a position to announce what services might be temporarily withdrawn from community services, especially primary medical services, because obviously that ultimately could lead to greater demand on accident and emergency units across Wales?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Diolch yn fawr am y croeso cynnes iawn a gyda'ch goddefgarwch, hoffwn ddiolch i'r holl Aelodau o bob rhan o'r Siambr hon a thu hwnt sydd wedi anfon dymuniadau gorau ataf i, yn enwedig y nodyn personol a ysgrifennodd y Prif Weinidog ataf i - fe wnes i ei werthfawrogi yn fawr - ynghyd â Gweinidogion eraill hefyd. Gallwn ni beidio ag ildio'r un fodfedd yn y Siambr hon, ond pan fyddwn ni'n mynd y tu allan i'r Siambr hon rydym ni i gyd yn fodau dynol, a gwerthfawrogais y gefnogaeth honno yn fawr, a dweud y lleiaf. Gadewais y Siambr hon ym mis Medi yn 19.5 stôn; rwyf i bellach yn 17.5 stôn. Felly, mae dwy stôn yn llai o gig eidion Cymreig yn y Siambr hon heddiw. [ Chwerthin.] Ond yn ôl at y busnes dan sylw, cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog yw'r rhain. Hoffwn i ofyn i chi, Prif Weinidog, am ofal iechyd sylfaenol ac, yn benodol, y sylwadau yr wythnos diwethaf gan Gymdeithas Feddygol Prydain a ddywedodd fod yn rhaid rhoi'r gorau i rywbeth yn sgil cyflwyno'r pigiad atgyfnerthu mewn gwasanaethau eraill, ac roedd y Gweinidog iechyd yn cytuno â'r ddarpariaeth y byddai'n rhaid cwtogi'r darpariaethau hynny fwy na thebyg, mewn meddygfeydd teulu yn arbennig. Mae Llywodraethau eraill yn y DU wedi gwneud cyhoeddiad dros y penwythnos. A ydych chi mewn sefyllfa i gyhoeddi pa wasanaethau allai gael eu tynnu yn ôl dros dro o wasanaethau cymunedol, yn enwedig gwasanaethau meddygol sylfaenol, oherwydd yn amlwg gallai hynny arwain yn y pen draw at fwy o alw am unedau damweiniau ac achosion brys ledled Cymru?
English: Well, Llywydd, before I begin, could I say it is very good indeed to see the Member back in his place in the Chamber this afternoon? Thank you for that important question as well. We are concluding our discussions with primary care providers in Wales. We do want them to play a greater part in the short-term but urgent need to bolster our vaccination programme ahead of the arrival, as I'm afraid we now must expect, of a major wave of the omicron variant. In Wales, we have taken a wider view of primary care than in some parts of the United Kingdom in the vaccination field, so we also include high-street optometrists and dentists as well, who are able to clinically successfully carry out vaccination. The things that will have to be put to one side temporarily, we hope, will be the most routine aspects of primary care - important things, I know. We pay a lot of money through the contract to our general medical services colleagues to carry out those surveillance activities, monitoring of people's diabetic condition, their blood pressure, all of those things. It's not for a moment to say they're not important, but of all the things that GPs do, they probably can be set to one side for a brief period of time in order to have greater capacity in primary care to deliver more of the vaccination programme, because of the urgent need to get ahead as far as we can, and as fast as we can, of the likely impact of that new variant.
Welsh: Wel, Llywydd, cyn i mi ddechrau, a gaf i ddweud ei bod hi'n braf iawn gweld yr Aelod yn ôl yn ei le yn y Siambr y prynhawn yma? Diolch am y cwestiwn pwysig yna hefyd. Rydym ni'n cloi ein trafodaethau gyda darparwyr gofal sylfaenol yng Nghymru. Rydym ni eisiau iddyn nhw chwarae mwy o ran yn yr angen byrdymor ond brys i gryfhau ein rhaglen frechu cyn, fel y mae arnaf ofn y mae'n rhaid i ni ei ddisgwyl bellach, i don fawr o amrywiolyn omicron gyrraedd. Yng Nghymru, rydym ni wedi edrych yn ehangach ar ofal sylfaenol nag mewn rhai rhannau o'r Deyrnas Unedig ym maes brechu, felly rydym ni hefyd yn cynnwys optometryddion a deintyddion y stryd fawr hefyd, a all ddarparu brechiadau clinigol yn llwyddiannus. Y pethau y bydd yn rhaid eu rhoi o'r neilltu dros dro, gobeithio, fydd yr agweddau mwyaf arferol ar ofal sylfaenol - pethau pwysig, rwy'n gwybod. Rydym ni'n talu llawer o arian drwy'r contract i'n cydweithwyr yn y gwasanaethau meddygol cyffredinol i gyflawni'r gweithgareddau gwyliadwriaeth hynny, fel monitro cyflwr diabetig pobl, eu pwysedd gwaed, yr holl bethau hynny. Nid yw hynny am eiliad yn dweud nad ydyn nhw'n bwysig, ond o'r holl bethau y mae meddygon teulu yn eu gwneud, mae'n debyg y gellir eu gosod o'r neilltu am gyfnod byr er mwyn cael mwy o gapasiti mewn gofal sylfaenol i ddarparu mwy o'r rhaglen frechu, oherwydd yr angen brys i achub y blaen cyn belled ag y gallwn, ac mor gyflym ag y gallwn, ar effaith debygol yr amrywiolyn newydd hwnnw.
English: Thank you for that answer, First Minister. It is important that we understand what services might be withdrawn; you alluded to health checks, for example. When might we know the outcome of these negotiations, because people are genuinely concerned? There have been understandable pressures on GP surgeries and getting appointments and I think it's really important that people understand what they can expect in the winter months going forward, with all the pressures that there are on GP surgeries. But importantly, what safeguards are going to be put in place to make sure that people can access the services over the important Christmas period and into the new year? Traditionally, that's a pressure point for understandable reasons and I hope, in those negotiations with primary care, that those discussions are leading to the provision of extra services, so that A&E can get that respite that it desperately needs. We know what went on in an A&E unit in Cardiff over the weekend where a plea went out not to turn up unless it was a life-threatening situation. I would suggest that that is replicated in A&E units across Wales, and so, knowing when those negotiations with primary providers are going to be concluded and what services might be withdrawn, I think is of critical importance. So, if you could give that, we would be most grateful.
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb yna, Prif Weinidog. Mae'n bwysig ein bod ni'n deall pa wasanaethau allai gael eu tynnu yn ôl; fe wnaethoch chi gyfeirio at archwiliadau iechyd, er enghraifft. Pryd gallem ni wybod canlyniad y trafodaethau hyn, oherwydd mae pobl yn wirioneddol bryderus? Bu pwysau dealladwy ar feddygfeydd teulu a chael apwyntiadau ac rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n bwysig iawn bod pobl yn deall yr hyn y gallan nhw ei ddisgwyl yn ystod misoedd y gaeaf wrth symud ymlaen, gyda'r holl bwysau sydd ar feddygfeydd teulu. Ond yn bwysig, pa fesurau diogelu fydd yn cael eu rhoi ar waith i wneud yn siŵr bod pobl yn gallu cael gafael ar y gwasanaethau dros gyfnod pwysig y Nadolig ac i'r flwyddyn newydd? Yn draddodiadol, mae hwnnw yn wasgbwynt am resymau dealladwy ac rwy'n gobeithio, yn y trafodaethau hynny gyda gofal sylfaenol, bod y trafodaethau hynny yn arwain at ddarparu gwasanaethau ychwanegol, fel y gall adrannau damweiniau ac achosion brys gael y seibiant hwnnw y mae ei angen yn daer. Rydym ni'n gwybod beth ddigwyddodd mewn uned damweiniau ac achosion brys yng Nghaerdydd dros y penwythnos lle gwnaethon nhw erfyn ar bobl i beidio â mynd yno oni bai ei bod hi'n sefyllfa a oedd yn fygythiad i fywyd. Byddwn i'n awgrymu bod hynny yn cael ei efelychu mewn unedau damweiniau ac achosion brys ledled Cymru, ac felly rwy'n credu ei bod yn hollbwysig gwybod pryd y bydd y trafodaethau hynny gyda darparwyr sylfaenol yn cael eu cwblhau a pha wasanaethau allai gael eu tynnu yn ôl. Felly, pe gallech chi rannu hynny, byddem yn ddiolchgar dros ben.
English: I thank the leader of the opposition for that and I thank him for drawing attention to the eighth year in a row in which there will be new and record investment in creating the workforce of the future for our NHS. And what Mr Davies said is right: we have cancer services of very high quality in all parts of Wales at the moment and that is a very precious resource to make sure that we sustain. On the issue of a cancer strategy, I think in some ways this is a debate about semantics rather than substance. England has a cancer plan, Scotland has a cancer strategy and we have a cancer quality statement. Now, those quality statements are derived from the parliamentary review of the health service here in Wales, which described ways in which we could make sure that, in all of the major conditions - heart disease, stroke and, of course, cancer - we had statements of national priorities, a focus on treatment and the early detection of disease. We published our cancer quality statement in March of this year and I think that it does the things that people who ask for a strategy or a plan are looking for. Now, of course, we are very happy to discuss that with those third sector organisations that the leader of the opposition mentioned, but it is not the case that there is no plan for Wales. There is a plan and there is a strategy; it's captured in that quality statement. The aim of the statement is to do exactly the sorts of things that the leader of the opposition suggested.
Welsh: Rwy'n diolch i arweinydd yr wrthblaid am hynna ac yn diolch iddo am dynnu sylw at yr wythfed flwyddyn yn olynol lle bydd buddsoddiad newydd a mwyaf erioed i greu gweithlu'r dyfodol ar gyfer ein GIG. Ac mae'r hyn a ddywedodd Mr Davies yn iawn: mae gennym ni wasanaethau canser o ansawdd uchel iawn ym mhob rhan o Gymru ar hyn o bryd ac maen nhw'n adnoddau gwerthfawr iawn i mae'n rhaid i ni wneud yn siŵr ein bod ni'n eu cynnal. O ran strategaeth ganser, rwy'n credu mewn rhai ffyrdd mai dadl am semanteg yn hytrach na sylwedd yw hon. Mae gan Loegr gynllun canser, mae gan yr Alban strategaeth ganser ac mae gennym ni ddatganiad ansawdd canser. Nawr, mae'r datganiadau ansawdd hynny yn deillio o'r adolygiad seneddol o'r gwasanaeth iechyd yma yng Nghymru, a ddisgrifiodd ffyrdd y gallem ni wneud yn siŵr, ym mhob un o'r prif gyflyrau - clefyd y galon, strôc ac, wrth gwrs, canser - fod gennym ni ddatganiadau o flaenoriaethau cenedlaethol, pwyslais ar driniaeth a chanfod clefydau yn gynnar. Fe wnaethom ni gyhoeddi ein datganiad ansawdd canser ym mis Mawrth eleni ac rwy'n credu ei fod yn gwneud y pethau y mae pobl sy'n gofyn am strategaeth neu gynllun yn chwilio amdanyn nhw. Nawr, wrth gwrs, rydym ni'n hapus iawn i drafod hynny gyda'r sefydliadau trydydd sector hynny y soniodd arweinydd yr wrthblaid amdanyn nhw, ond nid yw'n wir nad oes unrhyw gynllun ar gyfer Cymru. Mae cynllun ac mae strategaeth; mae wedi ei nodi yn y datganiad ansawdd hwnnw. Nod y datganiad yw gwneud yn union y mathau o bethau a awgrymodd arweinydd yr wrthblaid.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. Can I start by saying how glad I am to see the leader of the Welsh Conservatives back in his place here? We've disagreed many times in this Siambr, Andrew, and I'm sure we'll disagree many times again, and sometimes passionately, but can I say that we've always had the best of personal relationships? Can I also pay tribute to the way in which you spoke openly about issues of well-being? You are a real inspiration for us all in that. First Minister, the chief executive of the Development Bank of Wales has been making personal investments in companies based in Wales without seeking prior approval of the board. Is that something you, as First Minister, are comfortable with?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. A gaf i ddechrau drwy ddweud pa mor falch yr wyf i o weld arweinydd y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig yn ôl yn ei le yma? Rydym ni wedi anghytuno droeon yn y Siambr hon, Andrew, ac rwy'n siŵr y byddwn ni'n anghytuno droeon eto, ac weithiau'n angerddol, ond a gaf i ddweud ein bod ni bob amser wedi bod â'r berthynas bersonol orau posibl? A gaf i hefyd dalu teyrnged i'r ffordd y gwnaethoch chi siarad yn agored am faterion llesiant? Rydych chi'n ysbrydoliaeth wirioneddol i bob un ohonom ni yn hynny o beth. Prif Weinidog, mae prif weithredwr Banc Datblygu Cymru wedi bod yn gwneud buddsoddiadau personol mewn cwmnïau sydd wedi eu lleoli yng Nghymru heb geisio cymeradwyaeth y bwrdd ymlaen llaw. A yw hynny yn rhywbeth yr ydych chi, fel Prif Weinidog, yn gyfforddus ag ef?
English: I expect any chief executive or employee of an enterprise or agents of the Welsh Government to observe all of the proprieties and the rules that are required of them. I'm not sure if the leader of Plaid Cymru is suggesting that there has been impropriety here, but if he is, he should say so, and if he says so, then we will investigate that.
Welsh: Rwy'n disgwyl i unrhyw brif weithredwr neu gyflogai menter neu asiantau Llywodraeth Cymru gadw at yr holl briodoldebau a'r rheolau sy'n ofynnol ganddyn nhw. Nid wyf i'n siŵr a yw arweinydd Plaid Cymru yn awgrymu y bu amhriodoldeb yma, ond os ydyw, dylai ddweud hynny, ac os yw'n dweud hynny, yna byddwn yn ymchwilio i hynny.
English: Well, Mr Thorley did seek board approval and also wrote to the then-Minister for the economy before taking up his paid role as the chair of Zip World. Perhaps the First Minister could confirm whether Mr Thorley's personal investment in Zip World was also subject to prior board approval, as has been reported in the press. Now, if it was, and the reason that I raise this - . Well, the question is clear, isn't it? Why was the same principle not applied to his investment in the Cardiff-based start-up Love to Visit? Can I ask you a fairly basic point of principle, First Minister, if it is stipulated that Mr Thorley, who is already among the highest paid employees of any publicly funded body in Wales, should not invest in companies using knowledge or networks he has acquired through his work at the development bank? Wouldn't you agree with me that it's not an assessment that Mr Thorley should be able to make, effectively as judge and jury in his own case?
Welsh: Wel, fe wnaeth Mr Thorley ofyn am gymeradwyaeth y bwrdd ac ysgrifennodd hefyd at Weinidog yr economi ar y pryd cyn dechrau ei swydd gyflogedig fel cadeirydd Zip World. Efallai y gallai'r Prif Weinidog gadarnhau a oedd buddsoddiad personol Mr Thorley yn Zip World hefyd yn destun cymeradwyaeth y bwrdd ymlaen llaw, fel sydd wedi ei adrodd yn y wasg. Nawr, os oedd, a'r rheswm yr wyf i'n codi hyn - . Wel, mae'r cwestiwn yn eglur, onid yw? Pam na chafodd yr un egwyddor ei ddilyn ar gyfer ei fuddsoddiad yn y busnes newydd Love to Visit yng Nghaerdydd? A gaf i ofyn pwynt o egwyddor eithaf sylfaenol i chi, Prif Weinidog, a yw wedi ei nodi na ddylai Mr Thorley, sydd eisoes ymhlith y cyflogeion â'r tâl uchaf mewn unrhyw gorff a ariennir yn gyhoeddus yng Nghymru, fuddsoddi mewn cwmnïau drwy ddefnyddio gwybodaeth neu rwydweithiau y mae wedi eu caffael drwy ei waith yn y banc datblygu? Oni fyddech chi'n cytuno â mi nad yw'n asesiad y dylai Mr Thorley gael ei wneud, fel barnwr a rheithgor yn ei achos ei hun i bob pwrpas?
English: Well, I certainly agree with the final point, Llywydd, that where any person is carrying out work on behalf of the public interest in Wales and is in a publicly appointed position to do so, then they are bound by rulebooks that are not of their own making, nor should they be the sole arbiter of whether they are complying with those rulebooks. I'm not familiar with the detail of the decisions that are made by the chief executive of the Development Bank of Wales in the way that the leader of Plaid Cymru is. If there are specific concerns that ought to be investigated, then they need to be brought to the attention of the Government and then they will receive that attention.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n sicr yn cytuno â'r pwynt olaf, Llywydd, pan fo unrhyw berson yn gwneud gwaith ar ran budd y cyhoedd yng Nghymru ac mewn swydd a benodir yn gyhoeddus i wneud hynny, yna mae wedi ei rwymo gan lyfrau rheolau nad ydyn nhw wedi eu llunio ganddyn nhw eu hunain, ac nad y person hwnnw ddylai fod yr unig feirniad o ba un a yw'n cydymffurfio â'r llyfrau rheolau hynny. Nid wyf i'n gyfarwydd â manylion y penderfyniadau sy'n cael eu gwneud gan brif weithredwr Banc Datblygu Cymru yn y ffordd y mae arweinydd Plaid Cymru. Os oes pryderon penodol y dylid ymchwilio iddyn nhw, yna mae angen tynnu sylw'r Llywodraeth atyn nhw ac yna byddan nhw'n yn cael y sylw hwnnw.
English: As you know, First Minister, your predecessor Rhodri Morgan was highly critical of senior leadership figures within the Welsh Development Agency having outside business interests that gave rise to negative perceptions. He said, and I quote: 'Business does not just have to be done, it has to be seen to be done. That is well-nigh impossible when you have inter-locking relationships.' It's not enough to say that these matters are just for the board, for example, when this is a publicly owned company with the Welsh Government as its sole shareholder. You amended the framework document that sets out, as I understand, the Government's expectations of the bank in relation to governance - some of the questions that I've raised with you today - in February of this year. Can I ask that you publish that document, along with the remit letter you signed with the bank as a Government last month? Will you insist on a review of governance arrangements to ensure they meet people's reasonable expectation that the public interest is neither overlapped nor overridden by the private interest of individuals, to avoid some of the problems in perception that I've raised with you today?
Welsh: Fel y gwyddoch chi, Prif Weinidog, roedd eich rhagflaenydd Rhodri Morgan yn feirniadol iawn o ffigyrau arweinyddiaeth uwch yn Awdurdod Datblygu Cymru a oedd â buddiannau busnes allanol a arweiniodd at dybiaethau negyddol. Dywedodd, ac rwy'n dyfynnu: 'Nid yn unig y mae'n rhaid i fusnes gael ei gyflawni, mae'n rhaid iddo gael ei weld yn cael ei gyflawni. Mae hynny fwy neu lai yn amhosibl pan fydd gennych chi gysylltiadau sy'n cyd-gloi.' Nid yw'n ddigon i ddweud mai materion i'r bwrdd yn unig yw'r rhain, er enghraifft, pan fo hwn yn gwmni sy'n eiddo cyhoeddus a Llywodraeth Cymru yw ei unig gyfranddaliwr. Fe wnaethoch chi ddiwygio'r ddogfen fframwaith sy'n nodi, yn ôl yr hyn yr wyf i'n ei ddeall, ddisgwyliadau'r Llywodraeth o'r banc o ran llywodraethu - rhai o'r cwestiynau yr wyf i wedi eu codi gyda chi heddiw - ym mis Chwefror eleni. A gaf i ofyn i chi gyhoeddi'r ddogfen honno, ynghyd â'r llythyr cylch gwaith y gwnaethoch ei lofnodi gyda'r banc fel Llywodraeth fis diwethaf? A wnewch chi fynnu ar adolygiad o drefniadau llywodraethu i sicrhau eu bod nhw'n bodloni disgwyliad rhesymol pobl nad oes gorgyffwrdd na diystyriaeth rhwng budd y cyhoedd a buddiannau preifat unigolion, er mwyn osgoi rhai o'r problemau o ran tybiaethau yr wyf i wedi eu codi gyda chi heddiw?
English: I entirely agree with the final proposition that Mr Price made; people should not put themselves in that position. I very well remember the views of the former First Minister on the WDA and its history and a number of its employees. It is the regular position of the Welsh Government to publish remit letters to organisations that we sponsor, but the Development Bank of Wales does deal in commercially sensitive areas where it isn't always possible to put into the public domain the same level of information that is possible for bodies that don't deal in those same areas. I'm reluctant, Llywydd, to give general commitments on the back of suggestions that I'm not completely certain of the basis of them, or indeed what is being alleged. I will read very carefully the Record of what's been said this afternoon and, of course, if I think that any action does need to be taken by the Welsh Government, then that action will follow. FootnoteLink
Welsh: Rwy'n cytuno yn llwyr â'r cynnig terfynol a wnaeth Mr Price; ni ddylai pobl roi eu hunain yn y sefyllfa honno. Rwy'n cofio yn iawn farn y cyn Brif Weinidog ar Awdurdod Datblygu Cymru a'i hanes a nifer o'i gyflogeion. Safbwynt rheolaidd Llywodraeth Cymru yw cyhoeddi llythyrau cylch gwaith i sefydliadau yr ydym yn eu noddi, ond mae Banc Datblygu Cymru yn ymdrin â meysydd sy'n fasnachol sensitif lle nad yw bob amser yn bosibl cyhoeddi'r un lefel o wybodaeth â'r hyn sy'n bosibl i gyrff nad ydyn nhw'n ymdrin â'r un meysydd hynny. Rwy'n gyndyn, Llywydd, i roi ymrwymiadau cyffredinol ar sail awgrymiadau nad wyf i'n gwbl sicr o'u sail, nac yn wir yr hyn sy'n cael ei honni. Byddaf yn darllen yn ofalus iawn y Cofnod o'r hyn sydd wedi ei ddweud y prynhawn yma ac, wrth gwrs, os byddaf yn credu bod angen i Lywodraeth Cymru gymryd unrhyw gamau, yna bydd y camau hynny yn dilyn. FootnoteLink
English: I thank Mabon ap Gwynfor for that question. The roads review panel has worked quickly to identify and consider projects that are within the scope of the review. We expect to receive the interim report later this month. The final report and recommendations are expected to be ready in June 2022.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr i Mabon ap Gwynfor am y cwestiwn. Mae panel yr adolygiad ffyrdd wedi gweithio'n gyflym i nodi ac ystyried y prosiectau sydd o fewn cwmpas yr adolygiad. Rydym yn disgwyl yr adroddiad interim yn ddiweddarach y mis yma. Mae disgwyl i'r adroddiad terfynol a'r argymhellion fod yn barod ym mis Mehefin 2022.
English: Thank you very much for that response. May I read a section from the scope of the review, which is part of the criteria for the roads review? It says that: 'Access roads with the primary purpose of linking a site or premises for heavy industry to the public highway, or within the boundary of a heavy industry development site, will be excluded from the review. Access roads with the primary purpose of serving residential, retail and light office / light industrial developments should be paused at the next decision gateway to allow them to be considered by the review panel.' Do you think that there is an inconsistency here as you are exempting heavy industry - the most polluting roads - from the review, but are preventing those roads that will serve more rural areas, for light industry, such as Llanbedr, for example? Will you therefore explain the rationale and the science behind this?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn am yr ateb yna. Gaf i ddarllen tamaid allan o gwmpas yr adolygiad, sydd yn y cylch gorchwyl ar gyfer panel adolygu'r ffyrdd? Mae'n dweud: 'Bydd ffyrdd mynediad sydd â'r prif ddiben o gysylltu safle neu fangre ar gyfer diwydiant trwm â'r briffordd gyhoeddus, neu o fewn ffin safle datblygu diwydiant trwm, yn cael eu heithrio o'r adolygiad. Dylid oedi o ran ffyrdd mynediad gyda'r prif ddiben o wasanaethu datblygiadau preswyl, manwerthu a swyddfeydd / diwydiant ysgafn yn y porth penderfynu nesaf i'w galluogi i gael eu hystyried gan y panel adolygu.' Ydych chi'n meddwl fod yna anghysondeb yma wrth eich bod chi'n eithrio diwydiant trwm - y ffyrdd mwyaf llygredig - o'r adolygiad, ond yn oedi ac atal y ffyrdd sydd am wasanaethu cymunedau mwy gwledig, hwyrach, ffyrdd i ddiwydiant ysgafn ac yn y blaen, megis a welwyd yn Llanbedr? A wnewch chi felly esbonio'r rhesymeg a'r wyddoniaeth y tu ôl i hyn, os gwelwch yn dda?