English: First Minister, may I thank you not just for your statement but for all the work that you and your team are doing? I trust that you are bearing up well in these quite extraordinary circumstances. In trying to scrutinise what Welsh Government is doing, it is tempting to concentrate on the areas where the approach in Wales is somewhat different, perhaps, than that taken by the UK Government. But, overall, those differences are relatively small, and I think there's a far greater commonality in approach than there is any difference. There is, however, I think, between the UK and most countries in Europe, some difference in terms of how we approach that - that our lockdown, or at least compulsory lockdown, measures, came in rather later, and we are seeing, even in just looking at hospital deaths, deaths in the UK, and, indeed, Wales, on a per capita basis, as at or towards the top of the European league table, if that's not an inappropriate phrase to use, and the difficulties of the data and the comparisons are very real. I just wonder - . We can see that very negative side of it, all the families who are affected by those losses, and we commiserate in every possible way with them. We see that happening. What is the Welsh Government's planning assumption about what that will mean as we gradually, at some point in the future, are able to loosen measures? Does the Welsh Government consider that there will be a greater degree of immunity from people who have had the virus, be that asymptomatic or be that with relatively limited symptoms? There are studies suggesting in Stockholm perhaps around 30 per cent of people having had infection. Do we have an assumption or any way of measuring or projecting what that will be for Wales and what the impact of that will be when we consider easing measures? Could I also ask about the testing regime? We had, some time ago, community testing, and that was then shut down as we moved from one stage of the pandemic to another. We've had these targets of 5,000, or perhaps 9,000, at the end of the month for Wales, and 100,000 for the UK, or for England. I don't know if those are the right targets, but it doesn't look as if we're particularly in distance of hitting them, and I just wonder what can be done to make testing more widespread. One health board that I'm in good contact with - and it may be a more general issue - at least at the end of last week, didn't want to give wider testing to partners and other organisations because of concerns that they didn't have cover around data protection and GDPR, and they were waiting for Public Health Wales to publish, or at least share with them, a protocol on what should be done. Surely the degree of emphasis that would go to those issues should be less when we have a pandemic of this scale and we have this urgency of having greater testing. And if an organisation is sharing data from someone who's had a test and is sharing a swab to be tested with another organisation, a health board that's got the testing capacity, why can't that be tested and the test result and the other data returned whence it came, given that the person has given permission for that test? I know, ideally, one would like to give a lot of feedback and ensure what pathways people would go down, depending on what that test result is, but surely it is better that - if people believe they have coronavirus, it is better that they are tested and find out for sure whether they do or do not have that. I just wonder: can Welsh Government do anything or show a lead in terms of any data protection issues, if there still is a concern that's slowing or making it hard to test people who are not directly employed by the health boards? Can you as First Minister give a lead in that area?
Welsh: Brif Weinidog, a gaf fi ddiolch i chi nid yn unig am eich datganiad ond am yr holl waith rydych chi a'ch tîm yn ei wneud? Rwy'n gobeithio eich bod yn ymdopi yn yr amgylchiadau eithriadol hyn. Wrth geisio craffu ar yr hyn y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn ei wneud, mae'n demtasiwn i ganolbwyntio ar y meysydd lle mae'r dull gweithredu yng Nghymru ychydig yn wahanol, efallai, i'r hyn a wneir gan Lywodraeth y DU. Ond ar y cyfan, mae'r gwahaniaethau hynny'n gymharol fach, a chredaf fod mwy o lawer yn gyffredin yn y dulliau gweithredu nag sydd o wahaniaethau rhyngddynt. Fodd bynnag, rhwng y DU a'r rhan fwyaf o wledydd Ewrop, credaf fod rhywfaint o wahaniaeth o ran sut rydym yn mynd i'r afael â hynny - fod ein cyfyngiadau symud, neu o leiaf y cyfyngiadau symud gorfodol, wedi dod i rym ychydig yn hwyrach, ac rydym yn gweld, hyd yn oed wrth edrych ar farwolaethau mewn ysbytai yn unig, fod marwolaethau yn y DU, ac yn wir, yng Nghymru, fesul pen o'r boblogaeth, ar frig tabl cynghrair Ewrop, neu'n agos at y brig, os nad yw hwnnw'n ymadrodd amhriodol i'w ddefnyddio, ac mae anawsterau'r data a'r cymariaethau yn real iawn. Tybed - . Gallwn weld yr ochr negyddol iawn ar bethau, yr holl deuluoedd yr effeithir arnynt gan y colledion hynny, ac rydym yn cydymdeimlo â hwy ym mhob ffordd. Rydym yn gweld hynny'n digwydd. Beth yw rhagdybiaeth gynllunio Llywodraeth Cymru ynghylch yr hyn y bydd hynny'n ei olygu wrth inni lacio'r mesurau'n raddol ar ryw adeg yn y dyfodol? A yw Llywodraeth Cymru o'r farn y bydd mwy o imiwnedd gan bobl sydd wedi cael y feirws, boed hynny'n asymptomatig neu â symptomau cymharol ysgafn? Mae astudiaethau'n awgrymu yn Stockholm fod oddeutu 30 y cant o bobl o bosibl wedi cael eu heintio. A oes gennym ragdybiaeth neu unrhyw ffordd o fesur neu daflunio beth fydd y ffigur cyfatebol yng Nghymru a beth fydd effaith hynny pan fyddwn yn ystyried llacio'r mesurau? A gaf fi ofyn hefyd am y drefn brofi? Beth amser yn ôl, cawsom brofion cymunedol, a rhoddwyd diwedd ar hynny wrth inni symud o un cam o'r pandemig i'r llall. Rydym wedi cael targedau o 5,000, neu 9,000 efallai, erbyn diwedd y mis ar gyfer Cymru, a 100,000 ar gyfer y DU, neu ar gyfer Lloegr. Nid wyf yn gwybod a yw'r targedau hynny'n rhai cywir, ond nid ymddengys ein bod yn arbennig o agos i'w cyrraedd, a tybed beth y gellir ei wneud i gynnal profion ar raddfa fwy. Nid oedd un bwrdd iechyd rwyf mewn cysylltiad ag ef - ac efallai ei fod yn fater mwy cyffredinol - ddiwedd yr wythnos diwethaf o leiaf, yn awyddus i gynnal profion ehangach i bartneriaid a sefydliadau eraill oherwydd pryderon nad oes sicrwydd yswiriant ganddynt o ran diogelu data a GDPR, ac roeddent yn aros i Iechyd Cyhoeddus Cymru gyhoeddi protocol, neu ei rannu gyda hwy o leiaf, ar yr hyn y dylid ei wneud. Does bosibl na ddylai'r pwyslais a roddir ar y materion hynny fod yn llai pan fydd gennym bandemig ar y raddfa hon a'r angen dirfawr i gynnal mwy o brofion. Ac os yw sefydliad yn rhannu data gan rywun sydd wedi cael prawf ac sy'n rhannu swab i'w brofi gyda sefydliad arall, bwrdd iechyd sydd â'r capasiti i brofi, pam na ellir ei brofi a dychwelyd canlyniad y prawf a'r data arall i ble y daeth, o gofio bod yr unigolyn wedi rhoi caniatâd ar gyfer y prawf hwnnw? Yn ddelfrydol, rwy'n gwybod yr hoffai rhywun roi cryn dipyn o adborth a sicrhau pa lwybrau y byddai pobl yn eu dilyn, yn dibynnu ar ganlyniad y prawf hwnnw, ond does bosibl nad yw'n well - os yw pobl yn credu bod ganddynt y coronafeirws, mae'n well eu bod yn cael eu profi ac yn cael sicrwydd a ydynt wedi'i gael ai peidio. Tybed a all Llywodraeth Cymru wneud unrhyw beth neu ddangos arweiniad ar unrhyw faterion diogelu data os oes pryder o hyd sy'n arafu neu'n ei gwneud yn anodd profi pobl nad ydynt yn cael eu cyflogi'n uniongyrchol gan y byrddau iechyd? A allwch chi fel Prif Weinidog roi arweiniad yn hynny o beth?