English: I agree with pretty much everything that's been said, so I just want to focus on some further aspects. I just want to focus on the word 'beauty' in your statement, because I think that's a really important ambition. Why do we want to build ugly buildings? There's a huge cost to ugly buildings that we shouldn't be allowing. I recently visited Ewenny Court in Ely, which in the First Minister's constituency, to see the nine one-and two-bedroom homes that anybody would be proud to be living in, because they meet the beauty criteria as well as the placemaking criteria. In the Public Accounts Committee inquiry that we're doing into planning, I've come across the Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission's report that was produced about a month ago, which has three asks: ask for beauty, refuse ugliness, and promote stewardship. That echoes the Minister's ambitions for placemaking. In that report, they quote a senior building expert who says: 'Some housebuildersbelieve they can build any old crap and still sell'. And I am sure that is the case. I just wondered what we can do to outlaw rubbish that costs huge amounts of money to rectify, and to ensure that we not only have the same high-quality standards for private housing as we have for social housing, as well as ensuring that planning authorities have the guts and the ability to refuse poor proposals, which are a cost to society. If we put up rubbish buildings, we've then got to tear them down or redo them. So, I wondered if you could incorporate that into your review of the building regulations, as well as in your instructions to planning authorities, to simply refuse building proposals that aren't good enough and are not fully integrated into the placemaking ambitions that we have through this statement.
Welsh: Rwy'n cytuno gyda phopeth bron sydd wedi cael ei ddweud, felly rwyf am ganolbwyntio ar rai agweddau pellach. Fe hoffwn i ganolbwyntio ar y gair 'harddwch' yn eich datganiad chi, oherwydd rwyf i o'r farn fod honno'n uchelgais pwysig iawn. Pam rydym ni'n dymuno adeiladu adeiladau hyll? Mae cost enfawr i adeiladau hyll na ddylem ni fod yn ei chaniatáu. Fe wnes i ymweld yn ddiweddar â Llys Ewenni yn Nhrelái, sydd yn etholaeth y Prif Weinidog, i weld y naw cartref sydd ag un neu ddwy ystafell wely y byddai unrhyw un yn falch o fod yn byw ynddyn nhw, oherwydd maen nhw'n bodloni'r meini prawf o ran harddwch yn ogystal â'r meini prawf ar gyfer creu lleoedd. Yn ymchwiliad y Pwyllgor Cyfrifon Cyhoeddus i gynllunio yr ydym yn ei gynnal, rwyf wedi dod ar draws adroddiad y Comisiwn Building Better, Building Beautiful a gynhyrchwyd tua mis yn ôl, sydd â thri gofyniad ynddo, sef gofyn am harddwch, ymwrthod â hagrwch, a hyrwyddo stiwardiaeth. Mae hyn yn adleisio uchelgeisiau'r Gweinidog o ran creu lleoedd. Yn yr adroddiad hwnnw, maen nhw'n dyfynnu uwch arbenigwr adeiladu sy'n dweud: Mae rhai adeiladwyr tai yn credu y gallan nhw adeiladu unrhyw hen sothach a'i werthu beth bynnag. Ac rwy'n siŵr bod hynny'n wir. Tybed beth allwn ni ei wneud i wahardd sbwriel sy'n costio symiau mawr i unioni'r broblem, a sicrhau bod gennym nid yn unig yr un safonau o ansawdd uchel ar gyfer tai preifat ag sydd gennym ni ar gyfer tai cymdeithasol, yn ogystal â sicrhau bod gan yr awdurdodau cynllunio y dewrder a'r gallu i wrthod cynigion gwael, sy'n gost i'r gymdeithas. Os byddwn ni'n codi adeiladau tila, yna mae'n rhaid eu rhwygo i lawr neu eu hailgodi nhw. Felly, tybed a wnewch chi ymgorffori hynny yn eich adolygiad chi o'r rheoliadau adeiladu, yn ogystal ag yn eich cyfarwyddiadau chi i awdurdodau cynllunio, i wrthod cynigion adeiladu yn hollol nad ydyn nhw o safon a heb eu hintegreiddio yn llawn yn yr uchelgeisiau o ran creu lleoedd sydd gennym ni yn sgil y datganiad hwn.