English: Can I thank the Minister for his statement this afternoon? It's very much appreciated. I know we've often said that we keep hearing it, but it is important we keep being updated, particularly in a world in which what was said yesterday may no longer be valid today, and it is very fluid - not quite topsy-turvy, but moving very fast, changing very quickly - and I also appreciate the fact that the comments made from the two candidates don't help that situation. Only yesterday, Boris Johnson was clearly saying that, in fact, he wants the backstop removed totally, so he's changed his position even on that now. Once it was 'renegotiate'; now it's 'get rid of', and we all know that the European Union has categorically said that's not going to happen, so we are heading for a 'no deal' scenario, and I think he's just trying to find an excuse to justify his 'no deal' scenario on 31 October. If that's the case, we need to prepare for it, because clearly there are some serious issues that Wales has to address on that matter. I suppose I want to ask some of my questions focusing on literally that preparedness, because you highlighted in your statement very much the scenarios we are operating under, the context we're in, and then went on to move a little bit about some of the issues you've addressed. But can I talk about freight licences and heavy goods vehicle licences, for example? It's one of the areas we've talked about before. We have many logistics companies within Wales; there's a limited number of permits that will be available, and in a 'no deal' scenario, we could be facing a very challenging situation for those companies. What discussions have you had with the UK Government on the allocation of permits to Welsh companies, to ensure that they can operate if there is a 'no deal' scenario on 1 November? Also, what discussions have you had with the UK Government regarding the ports? Because, again, if that happens, we're going to be in a situation where we'll have to have border controls and regulatory controls on our ports, to look at the situations. Some of those responsibilities are not with the Welsh Government; they're with the UK Government. And yet ports, actually, is responsible under the Welsh Government, so what discussions are you having to make sure that we're in that position where we don't have to have a problem awaiting because simply it hasn't been thought of? I will mention the legalities of it, because you mentioned, just now, obviously, the emergency legislation that may have to come through. Have you done any analysis as to what types and what areas you will be looking at? Because, you were saying we need to be aware of it, but it's not just being aware of it; we need to be ready for it. So, what areas are you actually looking at now, and are you looking at those areas so that when we come back after the summer recess, you'll be able to tell us exactly in which areas you think emergency legislation may be needed if we're in that situation? Also, can you discuss the warehouses? We've been told - your statement highlights the point clearly - the warehousing issue is going to be contentious, because businesses want to continue operating under their normal regulation on business. That means they will want their warehouse spaces for their own businesses. We know that the Welsh Government looked at warehousing prior to the 29 March date. Where are we with, perhaps, refrigerated warehouses for medicines, if we need that? What's the situation for other warehousing, if we need that, because you're now in a competition with major organisations wanting warehouse space? So, again, have you made movements towards that area yet? I also want to know if you have discussed any of these issues with EU officials and other nations and regions across the EU, because as a nation we have had many memorandums of understanding and agreements with other regions and nations, and we will want to work with those in the situation when we leave the EU without a deal. So, I started to have discussions with those nations to see where they can help us as well because they will be on, technically, the other side of the argument. Also, do you agree with me - I am tired, really tired, of Members continuing to say 'EU intransigence' - that it is not EU intransigence; it is the failure of this Government in Westminster to actually get to grips with the actual solution? It's time that they actually got that message out. It's not EU intransigence; it is Conservative incompetence that has got us into this position, and we need to make sure that that message is loud and clear across the nation, because they are the ones who are holding us back. The two leading candidates at the moment are two of the largest proponents today of that failure.
Welsh: A gaf i ddiolch i'r Gweinidog am ei ddatganiad y prynhawn yma? Mae'n cael ei werthfawrogi'n fawr. Rwy'n gwybod ein bod ni wedi dweud yn aml ein bod yn ei glywed o hyd, ond mae'n bwysig ein bod yn parhau i gael y newyddion diweddaraf, yn enwedig mewn byd lle nad yw'r hyn a ddywedwyd ddoe yn ddilys mwyach heddiw, ac mae'n anwadal iawn - nid yn hollol wyneb i waered, ond yn symud yn gyflym iawn, gan newid yn gyflym iawn - ac rwyf hefyd yn gwerthfawrogi'r ffaith nad yw'r sylwadau a wnaed gan y ddau ymgeisydd yn helpu'r sefyllfa honno. Ddoe ddiwethaf, roedd Boris Johnson yn dweud yn glir ei fod, mewn gwirionedd, am i'r backstop gael ei ddileu'n llwyr, felly mae wedi newid ei safbwynt hyd yn oed ar hynny nawr. Ar un adeg 'aildrafod' oedd popeth; nawr 'diddymu' yw hi, ac rydym ni i gyd yn gwybod bod yr Undeb Ewropeaidd wedi dweud yn bendant nad yw hynny'n mynd i ddigwydd, felly rydym yn anelu am sefyllfa o ymadael heb gytundeb, ac rwy'n credu ei fod yn ceisio dod o hyd i esgus i gyfiawnhau ei sefyllfa o ymadael heb gytundeb ar 31 Hydref. Os felly, mae angen inni baratoi ar ei gyfer, oherwydd mae'n amlwg bod rhai materion difrifol y mae'n rhaid i Gymru roi sylw iddyn nhw ar y mater hwnnw. Mae'n debyg fy mod eisiau gofyn rhai o'm cwestiynau gan ganolbwyntio ar y parodrwydd hwnnw'n llythrennol, gan eich bod wedi tynnu sylw yn eich datganiad at y sefyllfaoedd yr ydym ni'n gweithredu ynddyn nhw, y cyd-destun yr ydym ni ynddo, ac yna symud ymlaen at rai o'r materion yr ydych chi wedi ymdrin â nhw. Ond a gaf i siarad am drwyddedau cludo nwyddau a thrwyddedau cerbydau trymion, er enghraifft? Mae'n un o'r meysydd yr ydym ni wedi siarad amdano o' r blaen. Mae gennym ni lawer o gwmnïau logisteg yng Nghymru; bydd nifer cyfyngedig o drwyddedau ar gael, ac mewn sefyllfa o ymadael heb gytundeb, gallem fod yn wynebu sefyllfa heriol iawn i'r cwmnïau hynny. Pa drafodaethau a ydych chi wedi'u cael gyda Llywodraeth y DU ynghylch dyrannu trwyddedau i gwmnïau o Gymru, er mwyn sicrhau y gallan nhw weithredu petai sefyllfa o ymadael heb gytundeb ar 1 Tachwedd? Hefyd, pa drafodaethau a ydych chi wedi'u cael gyda Llywodraeth y DU ynglŷn â'r porthladdoedd? Oherwydd, unwaith eto, os bydd hynny'n digwydd, byddwn mewn sefyllfa lle bydd yn rhaid i ni gael rheolaethau ffiniau a rheolaethau rheoleiddiol yn ein porthladdoedd, i edrych ar y sefyllfaoedd. Nid Llywodraeth Cymru sy'n gyfrifol am rai o'r cyfrifoldebau hynny; maen nhw'n gyfrifoldebau Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig. Ac eto, mewn gwirionedd, Llywodraeth Cymru sy'n gyfrifol am y porthladdoedd, felly pa drafodaethau ydych chi'n eu cael i sicrhau ein bod yn y sefyllfa honno lle nad oes rhaid i ni wynebu problem am nad yw wedi cael ei ystyried? Soniaf am gyfreithlondeb hynny, oherwydd fe wnaethoch chi sôn nawr am y ddeddfwriaeth frys efallai y bydd angen ei chyflwyno. A ydych chi wedi gwneud unrhyw ddadansoddiad o ran pa fathau a pha feysydd y byddwch yn edrych arnyn nhw? Oherwydd roeddech chi'n dweud bod angen i ni fod yn ymwybodol ohono, ond mae a wnelo hynny nid dim ond â bod yn ymwybodol ohono; mae angen inni fod yn barod amdano. Felly, ar ba feysydd ydych chi'n edrych arnyn nhw nawr, ac a ydych chi'n edrych ar y meysydd hynny fel y byddwch, pan ddown yn ôl ar ôl toriad yr haf, yn gallu dweud wrthym ni'n union ym mha feysydd y credwch y bydd angen deddfwriaeth frys os byddwn yn y sefyllfa honno? Hefyd, a wnewch chi drafod y warysau? Dywedwyd wrthym ni - mae eich datganiad yn amlygu'r pwynt yn glir - fod y mater yn ymwneud â warysau yn mynd i fod yn ddadleuol, oherwydd bod busnesau eisiau parhau i weithredu o dan eu rheoliadau busnes arferol. Mae hynny'n golygu y byddan nhw eisiau cael eu safleoedd warws ar gyfer eu busnesau eu hunain. Rydym ni'n gwybod bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi edrych ar warysau cyn 29 Mawrth. Beth yw'r sefyllfa o ran warysau rheweiddiedig ar gyfer meddyginiaethau, os oes angen hynny? Beth yw'r sefyllfa o ran warysau eraill, os oes angen hynny, oherwydd rydych chi bellach mewn cystadleuaeth â sefydliadau mawr sydd eisiau gofod warysau? Felly, unwaith eto, a ydych chi wedi symud tuag at y maes hwnnw eto? Hoffwn wybod hefyd a ydych chi wedi trafod unrhyw un o'r materion hyn gyda swyddogion yr UE a chenhedloedd a rhanbarthau eraill ledled yr UE, oherwydd fel cenedl cawsom lawer o femoranda o ddealltwriaeth a chytundebau â rhanbarthau a chenhedloedd eraill, a byddwn eisiau gweithio gyda'r rheini yn y sefyllfa pan fyddwn yn gadael yr UE heb gytundeb. Felly, dechreuais gael trafodaethau gyda'r gwledydd hynny i weld sut y gallan nhw ein helpu ni hefyd oherwydd y byddan nhw, yn dechnegol, ar ochr arall y ddadl. Hefyd, a ydych yn cytuno â mi - rwyf wedi blino, wedi blino'n lân clywed Aelodau'n dal i ddweud 'anhyblygrwydd yr UE' - nid anhyblygrwydd yr UE ydyw; yr hyn ydyw yw methiant y Llywodraeth yn San Steffan i fynd i'r afael â'r gwir ateb? Mae'n bryd iddyn nhw ledaenu'r neges honno mewn gwirionedd. Nid anhyblygrwydd yr UE ydyw ond anallu'r Ceidwadwyr sydd wedi ein harwain at y sefyllfa hon, ac mae angen inni sicrhau bod y neges honno'n glir ac yn groch ar draws y wlad, oherwydd nhw sy'n ein dal yn ôl. Y ddau ymgeisydd blaenllaw ar hyn o bryd yw dau o hyrwyddwyr mwyaf y methiant hwnnw heddiw.