techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: First Minister, I'm really glad to see that you are increasing the resources for those suffering with mental health problems. But what I'm finding in Aberconwy is the interpretation of the Mental Health Act 1983 - . And I know that many our patients are finding this very hard to navigate when it comes to support required. Even I, when I'm dealing on behalf of my constituents - it's really hard to ensure that statutory bodies are complying with this legislation, even down to treatment and care plans. When you ask the statutory partners responsible for a copy of the treatment and care plan, more often than not, we have to wait weeks to receive them. They've never, ever been written up in advance. I'm talking about people with complex mental health conditions. What will you do, as First Minister please, to ensure that it's not just the case of throwing money at this, and that strategic and well-intentioned plans are in place for these people who are, on some occasions, falling through the net and becoming very, very vulnerable indeed?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, rwy'n wirioneddol falch o weld eich bod chi'n cynyddu'r adnoddau ar gyfer y rhai sy'n dioddef problemau iechyd meddwl. Ond yr hyn yr wyf i'n ei weld yn Aberconwy yw'r dehongliad o Ddeddf Iechyd Meddwl 1983 - . A gwn fod llawer o'n cleifion yn ei chael hi'n anodd iawn dod o hyd i'w ffordd drwy hyn o ran y cymorth sydd ei angen. Rwyf i hyd yn oed, pan rwy'n gweithredu ar ran fy etholwyr - mae'n anodd iawn sicrhau bod cyrff statudol yn cydymffurfio â'r ddeddfwriaeth hon, hyd yn oed o ran cynlluniau gofal a thriniaeth. Pan fyddwch chi'n gofyn i'r partneriaid statudol cyfrifol am gopi o'r cynllun triniaeth a gofal, yn amlach na pheidio, mae'n rhaid i ni aros am wythnosau i'w derbyn. Nid ydyn nhw erioed wedi cael eu hysgrifennu ymlaen llaw. Rwy'n sôn am bobl sydd â chyflyrau iechyd meddwl cymhleth. Beth wnewch chi , fel Prif Weinidog os gwelwch yn dda, i sicrhau nad yw'n achos syml o daflu arian at hyn, a bod cynlluniau strategol sy'n llawn bwriadau da ar waith ar gyfer y bobl hyn sydd, weithiau, yn syrthio drwy'r rhwyd ac yn dod yn hynod agored i niwed?
English: We do expect, of course, public bodies to comply with the law. She asks about what structure should be in place. Leaving aside the issue of the amount of money available, our 10-year mental health strategy, 'Together for Mental Health', takes a population approach to improving the mental well-being of people in Wales and supporting people with a mental illness. We want to make sure that people can have access to talking therapies, for example. We're looking at ways of helping young people even more, and she will be aware, of course, of the money that's being put in place for child and adolescent mental health services. But we certainly expect that, where public bodies are expected to comply with legislation, they do so.
Welsh: Rydym ni yn disgwyl, wrth gwrs, i gyrff cyhoeddus gydymffurfio â'r gyfraith. Mae hi'n gofyn pa strwythur ddylai fod ar waith. Gan adael o'r neilltu y mater o faint o arian sydd ar gael, mae ein strategaeth iechyd meddwl 10 mlynedd, 'Law yn Llaw at Iechyd Meddwl', yn mabwysiadu dull poblogaeth o wella llesiant meddyliol pobl yng Nghymru a chynorthwyo pobl â salwch meddwl. Rydym ni eisiau gwneud yn siŵr y gall pobl gael mynediad at therapïau siarad, er enghraifft. Rydym ni'n ystyried ffyrdd o helpu pobl ifanc hyd yn oed yn fwy, a bydd yn ymwybodol, wrth gwrs, o'r arian sy'n cael ei roi ar waith ar gyfer gwasanaethau iechyd meddwl plant a'r glasoed. Ond rydym ni'n sicr yn disgwyl, pan ddisgwylir i gyrff cyhoeddus gydymffurfio â deddfwriaeth, eu bod nhw'n gwneud hynny.
English: First Minister, let me tell you about a 30-year-old man, who, after a mental health crisis, presented himself to Ysbyty Gwynedd, was then transferred overnight, on a six-and-a-half-hour journey, to a hospital in the south-east of England. His family was able to negotiate a handover to the home treatment team, so, after a week, he was returned home, but describes being accompanied back to his house, flanked by two guards, as embarrassing and traumatic. The whole experience he says left him feeling like a criminal and not a vulnerable patient. This is clearly unacceptable. So, what action will the Government take to address the shortage of mental health beds not just in north Wales, but throughout the country, and to include investment in beds themselves and staff, and also in home treatment teams?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, gadewch i mi ddweud wrthych chi am ddyn 30 mlwydd oed, a aeth, ar ôl argyfwng iechyd meddwl, i Ysbyty Gwynedd, cyn cael ei drosglwyddo dros nos, ar daith chwe awr a hanner, i ysbyty yn ne-ddwyrain Lloegr. Llwyddodd ei deulu i gytuno trosglwyddiad i'r tîm triniaeth yn y cartref, felly, ar ôl wythnos, fe'i dychwelyd adref, ond mae'n disgrifio ei brofiad o gael ei hebrwng yn ôl i'w dŷ, gan ddau warchodwr, fel un annifyr a thrawmatig. Fe wnaeth yr holl brofiad ei adael yn teimlo fel troseddwr ac nid claf agored i niwed. Mae hyn yn amlwg yn annerbyniol. Felly, pa gamau wnaiff y Llywodraeth eu cymryd i roi sylw i'r prinder gwelyau iechyd meddwl nid yn unig yn y gogledd, ond ledled y wlad, ac i gynnwys buddsoddiad yn y gwelyau eu hunain a staff, ac mewn timau triniaeth yn y cartref hefyd?
English: Well, the Member gives an example there that deserves further investigation. It's very difficult to comment on it without knowing more about it, but, if he wishes to write to me with more details, I would of course be pleased to investigate that for him. He asked the question as well on mental health spending. Well, of course, mental health spending is ring-fenced in Wales, and we plan to increase that funding by a further £20 million to nearly £650 million in 2018-19.
Welsh: Wel, mae'r aelod yn rhoi enghraifft yn y fan yna sy'n haeddu ymchwiliad pellach. Mae'n anodd iawn gwneud sylwadau ar hynny heb wybod mwy am y peth, ond, os hoffai ysgrifennu ataf gyda rhagor o fanylion, byddwn wrth gwrs yn falch o ymchwilio i hynny ar ei ran. Gofynnodd y cwestiwn hefyd am wariant iechyd meddwl. Wel, wrth gwrs, mae gwariant ar iechyd meddwl wedi ei neilltuo yng Nghymru, ac rydym ni'n bwriadu cynyddu'r cyllid hwnnw gan £20 miliwn ychwanegol i bron i £650 miliwn yn 2018-19.
English: First Minister, despite the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010, nearly a quarter of patients in Wales wait longer than 28 days for a local primary mental health support services assessment, and 20 per cent of those patients will wait more than 28 days for treatment following the assessment. In recent months, we have had warnings about insufficient consultant psychiatrists and problems recruiting sufficient psychologists. First Minister, what is your Government doing to improve recruitment of trained mental health clinical staff and put an end to lengthy delays in mental health treatment in Wales?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, er gwaethaf Mesur Iechyd Meddwl (Cymru) 2010, mae bron chwarter y cleifion yng Nghymru yn aros yn hwy na 28 diwrnod am asesiad gwasanaethau cymorth iechyd meddwl sylfaenol lleol, a bydd 20 y cant o'r cleifion hynny yn aros mwy na 28 diwrnod am driniaeth yn dilyn yr asesiad. Yn y misoedd diwethaf, rydym ni wedi cael rhybuddion am brinder seiciatryddion ymgynghorol a phroblemau yn recriwtio digon o seicolegwyr. Prif Weinidog, beth mae eich Llywodraeth yn ei wneud i wella'r broses o recriwtio staff clinigol iechyd meddwl wedi'u hyfforddi a rhoi terfyn ar oediadau hirfaith cyn cael triniaeth iechyd meddwl yng Nghymru?
English: Well, we have, of course, in place a recruitment campaign, which has proven very successful. We put extra resources into CAMHS when that was needed, when demand did become very high and that demand needed to be satisfied. I can say that more than 154,000 people have been seen by local primary mental health support services since their introduction, as part of the implementation of the Measure in 2012, and over 82,000 people have received therapeutic interventions by their LPMHSS. So, we know that many people have benefited from that Measure, and we can see, of course, that the budget is ring-fenced for mental health, to ensure that sufficient resource is available.
Welsh: Wel, mae gennym ni ymgyrch recriwtio ar waith, wrth gwrs, sydd wedi bod yn llwyddiannus iawn. Rydym ni wedi neilltuo adnoddau ychwanegol i CAMHS pan oedd hynny'n angenrheidiol, pan ddaeth galw yn uchel iawn a bod angen bodloni'r galw hwnnw. Gallaf ddweud bod mwy na 154,000 o bobl wedi eu gweld gan wasanaethau cymorth iechyd meddwl sylfaenol lleol ers eu cyflwyno, yn rhan o weithrediad y Mesur yn 2012, ac mae dros 82,000 o bobl wedi derbyn ymyraethau therapiwtig gan eu LPMHSS. Felly, rydym ni'n gwybod bod llawer o bobl wedi elwa ar y Mesur hwnnw, a gallwn weld, wrth gwrs, bod y gyllideb wedi ei neilltuo ar gyfer iechyd meddwl, i sicrhau bod adnoddau digonol ar gael.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. First Minister, tomorrow, there'll be a motion before the Assembly to ask the Assembly's permission to set up an inquiry by the Committee for the Scrutiny of the First Minister to scrutinise the allegations that have been made about the time in office of Leighton Andrews, and your special adviser, Steve Jones. I understand the leader of the house will respond to that debate tomorrow, which is quite right, because it's organising Assembly business. But I'm just working out in my own mind - I'm sure many other people are trying to work out in their own mind - why the Government has tabled a 'delete all' amendment to that motion, and why you have an objection to the Committee for the Scrutiny of the First Minister undertaking this piece of work, on what certainly is not a political point, I would suggest; it is merely trying to get to the bottom of the allegations that have been made.
Welsh: Diolch i chi, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, yfory, bydd cynnig gerbron y Cynulliad i ofyn caniatâd y Cynulliad i sefydlu ymchwiliad gan y Pwyllgor Craffu ar Waith y Prif Weinidog i graffu ar yr honiadau a wnaed am gyfnod Leighton Andrews a'ch cynghorwr arbennig, Steve Jones, yn eu swyddi. Rwy'n deall y bydd arweinydd y tŷ yn ymateb i'r ddadl honno yfory, sy'n gwbl gywir, gan ei fod yn achos o drefnu busnes y Cynulliad. Ond rwy'n ceisio gweithio allan yn fy meddwl fy hun - rwy'n siŵr bod llawer o bobl eraill yn ceisio gweithio allan yn eu meddyliau eu hunain - pam mae'r Llywodraeth wedi cyflwyno gwelliant 'dileu popeth' i'r cynnig hwnnw, a pham mae gennych chi wrthwynebiad i'r Pwyllgor Craffu ar Waith y Prif Weinidog ymgymryd â'r darn hwn o waith, ar yr hyn y mae'n sicr nad yw'n bwynt gwleidyddol, byddwn yn awgrymu; y cwbl mae'n ei wneud yw ceisio mynd at wraidd yr honiadau a wnaed.
English: Well, I take the view that an independent process is the best way of doing that, and that's why we've tabled the amendment that we have.
Welsh: Wel, rwyf i o'r farn mai proses annibynnol yw'r ffordd orau o wneud hynny, a dyna pam yr ydym ni wedi cyflwyno'r gwelliant yr ydym ni wedi ei gyflwyno.
English: Well, surely, the Committee for the Scrutiny of the First Minister is an independent process. People sit on that committee and look objectively at the evidence that's given to the committee, and ultimately determine and provide a report based on that evidence. It was slightly alarming, from the Counsel General's interview on the Politics Show, that he questioned the ability of the Chair - as a Labour Chair - and Labour Members to actually be objective in their scrutiny. I believe that they will act with integrity and objectivity on the evidence that is provided by the witnesses that would come before them. I have the words here, which actually do say, 'the Labour Chair and AMs to act impartially on the subject', which I have stated is clearly not a political subject. [ Interruption.] But those are the words - I've got them here in front of me - if, from a sedentary position, the Member wants to talk about them. So, I do believe that they would act objectively, and I do think it is important for this institution that, if that vote is carried tomorrow, the Committee for the Scrutiny of the First Minister is allowed to undertake that work. Surely that's what that committee actually does. So, I do ask you again to enlarge why you have put that 'delete all' motion down that will prevent the very committee that is charged by this Assembly to scrutinise you and your office and the activities of you and your office while in Government?
Welsh: Wel, does bosib nad yw Pwyllgor Craffu ar Waith y Prif Weinidog yn broses annibynnol. Mae pobl yn eistedd ar y pwyllgor hwnnw ac yn edrych yn wrthrychol ar y dystiolaeth a roddir i'r Pwyllgor, gan wneud penderfyniad a darparu adroddiad yn seiliedig ar y dystiolaeth honno yn y pen draw. Roedd yn peri pryder braidd, o gyfweliad y Cwnsler Cyffredinol ar y Politics Show, ei fod yn amau gallu'r Cadeirydd - fel Cadeirydd Llafur - ac Aelodau Llafur i fod yn wirioneddol wrthrychol yn eu gwaith craffu. Rwyf i'n credu y byddan nhw'n gweithredu gydag uniondeb a gwrthrychedd ar sail y dystiolaeth a ddarperid gan y tystion a fyddai'n dod ger eu bron. Mae'r geiriau gen i yma, sydd yn dweud mewn gwirionedd, 'y Cadeirydd ac ACau Llafur i weithredu'n ddiduedd ar y pwnc', yr wyf i wedi datgan yn eglur nad yw'n bwnc gwleidyddol. [ Torri ar draws.] Ond dyna'r geiriau - maen nhw gen i yma o fy mlaen - os yw'r Aelod eisiau eu trafod drwy fod ar ei eistedd. Felly, rwy'n credu y bydden nhw yn gweithredu'n wrthrychol, ac rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n bwysig i'r sefydliad hwn, os derbynnir y bleidlais honno yfory, y caniateir i'r Pwyllgor Craffu ar Waith y Prif Weinidog wneud y gwaith hwnnw. Onid dyna mae'r pwyllgor hwnnw'n ei wneud mewn gwirionedd. Felly, gofynnaf eto i chi ymhelaethu ar pam yr ydych chi wedi cyflwyno'r cynnig 'dileu popeth' hwnnw a fydd yn atal yr union bwyllgor y mae'r Cynlluniad hwn yn gosod y cyfrifoldeb arno am graffu arnoch chi a'ch swyddfa a'ch gweithgareddau chi a'ch swyddfa pan eich bod yn y Llywodraeth?
English: Well, he has been partial himself in the words that he has alleged the Counsel General used - that's the problem. The committee is there to scrutinise me as First Minister - of course it is - but I take the view, and I think reasonable people will take the view, that, where there is an issue such as this, an independent process is the right to process to deal with the issue.
Welsh: Wel, mae ef ei hun wedi bod yn unochrog yn y geiriau yr oedd yn honni i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol eu defnyddio - dyna'r broblem. Mae'r pwyllgor yno i graffu arnaf i fel Prif Weinidog - wrth gwrs ei fod - ond rwyf i o'r farn, ac rwy'n credu y bydd pobl resymol o'r farn, pan geir mater fel hwn, mai proses annibynnol yw'r broses gywir i ymdrin â'r mater.
English: Well, it is really regrettable to see that you are not prepared to have confidence in the committees of this Assembly to actually do the work that they are charged with doing and actually listen to the evidence that is given. But, tomorrow, there is a motion and there is an amendment. So, whichever one carries, there will be an inquiry. Can you confirm that Government Ministers or Government Secretaries who will be giving evidence to either one of those investigations will be relieved of collective responsibility and they can speak as individuals when putting the evidence before the investigations? And, above all, I'm not sure how people will vote in this Chamber tomorrow, but it could well boil down to one vote. These allegations are levelled at you as First Minister, and the activities of the First Minister's office. Will you absent yourself from voting in that vote tomorrow, given that it is specifically dealing with allegations - and I level this - which need to either be proved or dismissed and are levelled at you as First Minister? Will you absent yourself from that vote?
Welsh: Wel, mae'n peri gofid mawr gweld nad ydych chi'n barod i fod â ffydd ym mhwyllgorau'r Cynulliad hwn i wneud y gwaith y maen nhw'n gyfrifol am ei wneud a gwrando ar y dystiolaeth a roddir. Ond, yfory, ceir cynnig a cheir gwelliant. Felly, pa bynnag un fydd yn ennill y bleidlais, bydd ymchwiliad. A allwch chi gadarnhau y bydd Gweinidogion y Llywodraeth neu Ysgrifenyddion y Llywodraeth a fydd yn rhoi tystiolaeth i unrhyw un o'r ymchwiliadau hynny yn cael eu rhyddhau o gyfrifoldeb ar y cyd ac y cânt siarad fel unigolion wrth roi'r dystiolaeth gerbron yr ymchwiliadau? Ac, yn anad dim, nid wyf yn siŵr sut bydd pobl yn pleidleisio yn y Siambr hon yfory, ond mae'n bosibl iawn y gallai fod un bleidlais ynddi. Mae'r cyhuddiadau hyn wedi eu gwneud yn eich erbyn chi fel Prif Weinidog, a gweithgareddau swyddfa'r Prif Weinidog. A wnewch chi absenoli eich hun o bleidleisio yn y bleidlais honno yfory, o ystyried ei bod yn ymdrin yn benodol â honiadau - ac rwy'n gwneud y cyhuddiad hwn - y mae angen naill ai eu profi neu eu hanwybyddu ac sydd wedi eu gwneud yn eich erbyn chi fel Prif Weinidog? A wnewch chi absenoli eich hun o'r bleidlais honno?
English: Well, I think, by his comments today, the leader of the opposition has shown that it's highly political what he's trying to do; it's nothing to do with it being impartial at all. I saw his comments over the weekend, when he said that he wants an investigation up to the present day, for no apparent reason. Also, he said that the committee should make recommendations about the running of the First Minister's office. It's not a matter for the committee as to how the Welsh Government is run in that way. I am not afraid of an independent process. I'm not afraid of an independent process. I'm not afraid of an independent adviser looking as to whether I've breached the ministerial code, because I'm confident that I have not. I am not afraid of an independent process. I don't know why he is so afraid of an independent process.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n credu, ar sail ei sylwadau heddiw, bod arweinydd yr wrthblaid wedi dangos ei fod yn wleidyddol iawn yn yr hyn y mae'n ceisio ei wneud; nid yw'n ymwneud o gwbl â bod yn ddiduedd. Gwelais ei sylwadau dros y penwythnos, pan ddywedodd ei fod eisiau ymchwiliad hyd at heddiw, am ddim rheswm amlwg. Hefyd, dywedodd y dylai'r Pwyllgor wneud argymhellion ynghylch rhedeg Swyddfa'r Prif Weinidog. Nid yw'n fater i'r pwyllgor sut y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn cael ei rhedeg yn y modd hwnnw. Nid wyf yn ofni proses annibynnol. Nid wyf yn ofni proses annibynnol. Nid wyf yn ofni cynghorydd annibynnol yn ymchwilio i ba un a ydw i wedi mynd yn groes i'r Cod Gweinidogol, gan fy mod i'n ffyddiog nad wyf i wedi gwneud hynny. Nid wyf yn ofni proses annibynnol. Nid wyf i'n gwybod pam mae e'n ofni proses annibynnol gymaint.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. First Minister, mental health and children's mental health is one of the biggest issues facing Wales at the moment and, on 27 September last year, you claimed that investment would drive down waiting times for child and adolescent mental health services. You said, 'The resources have been put in and I fully expect the waiting times and the numbers to go down as those resources work through the system.' Do you stand by that statement?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, iechyd meddwl ac iechyd meddwl plant yw un o'r problemau mwyaf sy'n wynebu Cymru ar hyn o bryd ac, ar 27 Medi y llynedd, fe wnaethoch honni y byddai buddsoddiad yn lleihau amseroedd aros am wasanaethau iechyd meddwl plant a'r glasoed. Dywedasoch, 'Mae'r adnoddau wedi eu sefydlu ac rwyf yn llwyr ddisgwyl i'r amseroedd aros a'r niferoedd leihau wrth i'r adnoddau hynny weithio drwy'r system.' A ydych chi'n glynu wrth y datganiad hwnnw?
English: Yes, I do. It is right to say, for example, with CAMHS, demand did outstrip what was available. There's no question about that and that's why we put the extra £8 million a year into children and adolescent mental health services in order to deal with that. If we look at the new funding that's been announced for mental health, on top of the general increases, £22 million of new funding has been targeted at improving access to a number of specific services: so, £8 million a year for older person's mental health; the £8 million I've mentioned for CAMHS; £3 million a year for psychological therapies for adult services; more than £0.5 million a year for community perinatal services, and £1.5 million a year in local primary mental health support services to further support the Measure in 2012.
Welsh: Ydw, mi ydwyf. Mae'n iawn i ddweud, er enghraifft, gyda CAMHS, bod y galw'n fwy na'r hyn a oedd ar gael. Nid oes unrhyw amheuaeth am hynny a dyna pam y gwnaethom ni roi'r £8 miliwn ychwanegol y flwyddyn wasanaethau iechyd meddwl plant a'r glasoed er mwyn ymdrin â hynny. Os edrychwn ni ar y cyllid newydd sydd yn cael ei gyhoeddi ar gyfer iechyd meddwl, y tu hwnt i'r cynnydd cyffredinol, targedwyd £22 miliwn o gyllid newydd at wella mynediad at nifer o wasanaethau penodol: felly, £8 miliwn y flwyddyn ar gyfer iechyd meddwl pobl hŷn; yr £8 miliwn yr wyf i newydd ei grybwyll ar gyfer CAMHS; £3 miliwn y flwyddyn ar gyfer therapïau seicolegol ar gyfer gwasanaethau i oedolion; mwy na £0.5 miliwn y flwyddyn ar gyfer gwasanaethau amenedigol cymunedol, a £1.5 miliwn y flwyddyn mewn gwasanaethau cymorth iechyd meddwl sylfaenol lleol i gefnogi ymhellach y Mesur yn 2012.
English: Earlier this year, First Minister, StatsWales changed the way that waiting time numbers were being reported, removing the cases that were regarded as non-CAMHS pathways. This removed 1,700 children - some 74 per cent of the total - from the waiting list in one fell stroke. That makes historic comparisons impossible, but we do now have seven month's worth of new data, which means that we can see what has happened so far this year, and it's clear that waiting times for CAMHS are getting worse. Back in March, 87 per cent of children were waiting less than a month, and now it's 45 per cent. Back in March, no children were waiting longer than 16 weeks for that first appointment, and now one in five children are. That doesn't sound like a driving down of waiting times to me. You've previously argued that there are too many children being referred for specialist treatment. Do you still think that the problem with CAMHS is that too many children are being referred?
Welsh: Yn gynharach eleni, Prif Weinidog, newidiodd StatsCymru y ffordd yr oedd niferoedd amseroedd aros yn cael eu hadrodd, gan gael gwared ar yr achosion a oedd yn cael eu hystyried fel llwybrau nad oeddent yn CAMHS. Tynnodd hyn 1,700 o blant - tua 74 y cant o'r cyfanswm - oddi ar y rhestr ar unwaith. Mae hynny'n gwneud cymariaethau hanesyddol yn amhosibl, ond mae gennym ni werth saith mis o ddata newydd erbyn hyn, sy'n golygu y gallwn ni weld beth sydd wedi digwydd hyd yn hyn eleni, ac mae'n amlwg bod amseroedd aros ar gyfer CAMHS yn gwaethygu. Yn ôl ym mis Mawrth, roedd 87 y cant o blant yn aros llai na mis, 45 y cant yw hynny erbyn hyn. Yn ôl ym mis Mawrth, nid oedd unrhyw blant yn aros yn hwy na 16 wythnos am yr apwyntiad cyntaf hwnnw, a bellach mae hynny'n wir am un o bob pump o blant. Nid yw hynny'n swnio fel lleihau amseroedd aros i mi. Rydych chi wedi dadlau yn y gorffennol bod gormod o blant yn cael eu hatgyfeirio ar gyfer triniaeth arbenigol. A ydych chi'n dal i gredu mai'r broblem gyda CAMHS yw bod gormod o blant yn cael eu hatgyfeirio?