English: Thank you for the question. I ought to start by recognising, in response, not just Julie Morgan's role in campaigning on this issue whilst a Member of this Assembly and as chair of the cross-party group, but also from her previous years in Parliament, with a real and active interest in this issue and the scandal that has affected people right across the United Kingdom, including here in Wales. This has been an issue where, again, there's been cross-party interest both in Parliament and in this Assembly. I'll start with your final point, if you like, about the links between the two Governments. I have to say that this is one where I'm hoping that there will be a more respectful relationship between the administrations. I previously wrote to Lord Prior, on 20 October 2016, about this issue, following a response the Prime Minister gave to Diana Johnson during Prime Minister's Questions in September of that year. I didn't receive a response. I then wrote to Jeremy Hunt on 20 December 2016 and I didn't receive a response to that letter either. If there is to be genuinely what the UK Government have announced they want to see, which I welcome - a genuine inquiry that listens to the people directly affected and involved, and, in a response to my constituency colleague, Stephen Doughty, in Parliament yesterday, the Government again indicated that they want the devolved administrations to be properly involved - then that does mean that there needs to be a difference in approach. Rather than simply deciding the remit for themselves at the Department of Health for a UK-wide inquiry, there needs to be rather more genuine engagement not just with the Government, but with the families and the victims themselves as well. Because, if another inquiry is provided that doesn't have the power to compel witnesses and that does not provide full and proper disclosure, that won't just simply be a missed opportunity, but will create further anger and mistrust from a group of people who have not be well treated for many years in the past. So, the announcement is welcome, but getting it right and getting the terms right and genuinely listening to the families affected and to the devolved administrations is really important. I completely agree on the broad outline about the need for compulsion of witnesses and disclosure, and I certainly hope that we can come to a proper agreement on that so that the inquiry will retain full public confidence as it undertakes its work.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiwn. Dylwn ddechrau drwy gydnabod, wrth ymateb, nid yn unig rôl Julie Morgan yn ymgyrchu ar y mater tra bu'n Aelod o'r Cynulliad hwn ac fel cadeirydd y grŵp trawsbleidiol, ond hefyd o'i blynyddoedd blaenorol yn y Senedd, gyda diddordeb dwfn a gweithredol yn y mater hwn a'r sgandal sydd wedi effeithio ar bobl ar draws y Deyrnas Unedig, gan gynnwys yma yng Nghymru. Mae hon wedi bod yn broblem a enynnodd ddiddordeb trawsbleidiol, unwaith eto, yn y Senedd ac yn y Cynulliad hwn. Rwyf am ddechrau gyda'ch pwynt olaf, os hoffech, am y cysylltiadau rhwng y ddwy Lywodraeth. Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud bod hwn yn un lle rwy'n gobeithio gweld perthynas fwy parchus rhwng y gweinyddiaethau. Ysgrifennais yn flaenorol at yr Arglwydd Prior am y mater hwn ar 20 Hydref 2016 yn dilyn ymateb a roddodd Prif Weinidog y DU i Diana Johnson yn ystod Cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog ym mis Medi y flwyddyn honno. Ni chefais ateb. Ysgrifennais wedyn at Jeremy Hunt ar 20 Rhagfyr 2016 ac ni chefais ateb i'r llythyr hwnnw ychwaith. Os yw'r hyn y mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi cyhoeddi eu bod am ei weld, ac rwy'n croesawu hynny, i ddwyn ffrwyth mewn gwirionedd - ymchwiliad go iawn sy'n gwrando ar y bobl yr effeithiwyd arnynt yn uniongyrchol ac sy'n rhan o hyn, ac mewn ymateb i fy nghydweithiwr etholaeth, Stephen Doughty, yn y Senedd ddoe, dangosodd y Llywodraeth unwaith eto eu bod eisiau i'r gweinyddiaethau datganoledig gymryd rhan yn briodol - yna mae hynny'n golygu bod angen cael ymagwedd wahanol. Yn hytrach na phenderfynu'n syml ar eu cylch gwaith eu hunain yn yr Adran Iechyd ar gyfer ymchwiliad ledled y DU, mae angen ymgysylltiad ychydig yn fwy dilys, nid yn unig â'r Llywodraeth, ond â'r teuluoedd a'r dioddefwyr eu hunain hefyd. Oherwydd, os ceir ymchwiliad arall heb bŵer i orfodi tystion i roi tystiolaeth ac nad yw'n darparu datgeliad llawn a phriodol, bydd yn gyfle a gollwyd, ond bydd hefyd yn creu dicter a diffyg ymddiriedaeth pellach ymhlith grŵp o bobl nad ydynt wedi cael eu trin yn dda dros nifer o flynyddoedd yn y gorffennol. Felly, mae'r cyhoeddiad i'w groesawu, ond mae ei gael yn iawn a chael y telerau'n gywir, a gwrando go iawn ar y teuluoedd yr effeithiwyd arnynt ac ar y gweinyddiaethau datganoledig yn bwysig iawn. Cytunaf yn llwyr â'r amlinelliad bras o ran yr angen i orfodi tystion a datgeliad, ac rwy'n sicr yn gobeithio y gallwn ddod i gytundeb priodol ar hynny fel bod yr ymchwiliad yn cadw hyder y cyhoedd yn llawn wrth iddo gyflawni ei waith.