techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, it is a fact that around 25 per cent to one third of referrals to specialist CAMHS are redirected to other services because the referral is inappropriate for what is a highly specialised service. Now, that's done to ensure that those children who require specialist support are able to receive it in a timely manner. Of course we expect CAMHS to deal with those young people who need help from CAMHS, but we also know that many of those young people who are directed to CAMHS in the first place aren't directed elsewhere to a service that is more appropriate for them.
Welsh: Wel, mae'n ffaith bod tua 25 y cant i draean o atgyfeiriadau at CAMHS arbenigol yn cael eu hailgyfeirio i wasanaethau eraill gan fod yr atgyfeiriad yn amhriodol ar gyfer yr hyn sy'n wasanaeth hynod arbenigol. Nawr, gwneir hynny i sicrhau bod y plant hynny sydd angen cymorth arbenigol yn gallu ei gael yn brydlon. Wrth gwrs, rydym ni'n disgwyl i CAMHS ymdrin â'r bobl ifanc hynny sydd angen cymorth gan CAMHS, ond rydym ni hefyd yn gwybod bod llawer o'r bobl ifanc hynny sy'n cael eu cyfeirio at CAMHS yn y lle cyntaf nad ydynt yn cael eu cyfeirio i fannau eraill at wasanaeth sy'n fwy priodol iddyn nhw.
English: Seventy-four per cent. When confronted by a long-standing problem, First Minister, it looks like the response of your Government is to move the goalposts and to manipulate the data or to claim that not everyone really needed the service. Now, there are several other examples where, rather than improve services, you've moved the goalposts. It happened with the ambulance service, the number of full-time GPs in the NHS, and last week cancer targets were changed but we don't yet know what to. Yet you still reject Plaid Cymru's call for a 28-day diagnosis target set by the independent cancer task force. Isn't it time we removed your Government's ability to avoid scrutiny by moving the goalposts? And isn't it time that Wales established an independent body for setting targets and publishing the data against those targets? What will it take, First Minister, for waiting times in CAMHS to be reduced so that children get the treatment that they need?
Welsh: Saith deg pedwar y cant. Pan fydd yn wynebu problem hirsefydlog, Prif Weinidog, mae'n ymddangos mai ymateb eich Llywodraeth yw newid y rheolau a thrin y data neu hawlio nad oedd pawb wir angen y gwasanaeth. Nawr, ceir nifer o enghreifftiau eraill lle, yn hytrach na gwella gwasanaethau, yr ydych chi wedi newid y rheolau. Digwyddodd hynny â'r gwasanaeth ambiwlans, nifer y meddygon teulu llawn amser yn y GIG, a newidiwyd y targedau canser yr wythnos diwethaf, ond nid ydym ni'n gwybod i beth eto. Ac eto rydych chi'n dal i wrthod galwad Plaid Cymru am darged diagnosis 28 diwrnod a bennwyd gan y tasglu canser annibynnol. Onid yw'n bryd i ni gael gwared ar allu eich Llywodraeth i osgoi craffu trwy newid y rheolau? Ac onid yw'n bryd i Gymru sefydlu corff annibynnol ar gyfer gosod targedau a chyhoeddi'r data yn erbyn y targedau hynny? Beth fydd ei angen, Prif Weinidog, i amseroedd aros yn CAMHS gael eu lleihau fel bod plant yn cael y driniaeth sydd ei hangen arnynt?
English: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. The temperature in this Chamber may rise tomorrow, but I wonder if the First Minister's seen that the Met Office forecasts for outside show that we are likely to have sub-zero temperatures for the next week or two. I wonder if he also saw on Monday in The Guardian that there was a report saying that electricity and gas prices have risen in the last 20 years by three times the rate of inflation and the average household now spends £562 a year on heating and lighting. What it didn't say was that this is overwhelmingly due to the rise in green taxes, which will cost households almost £150 a year from next year, and they've risen by two thirds since 2014 and are now 20 per cent of the typical electricity bill. Considering that a quarter of the households in Wales live in fuel poverty, how can we justify loading these charges upon the poorest and most vulnerable in society?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. Efallai y bydd y tymheredd yn y Siambr hon yn codi yfory, ond tybed a yw'r Prif Weinidog wedi gweld bod rhagolygon y Swyddfa Dywydd ar gyfer y tu allan yn dangos ein bod ni'n debygol o gael tymheredd is-sero dros yr wythnos neu ddwy nesaf. Tybed a welodd hefyd ddydd Llun yn The Guardian fod adroddiad yn dweud bod prisiau trydan a nwy wedi codi o dair gwaith cyfradd chwyddiant yn yr 20 mlynedd diwethaf a bod cartref cyffredin yn gwario £562 flwyddyn ar wresogi a goleuo erbyn hyn. Yr hyn nad oedd yn ei ddweud oedd bod hyn i raddau helaeth iawn oherwydd y cynnydd i drethi gwyrdd, a fydd yn costio bron i £150 y flwyddyn i aelwydydd o'r flwyddyn nesaf, ac maen nhw wedi codi gan ddwy ran o dair ers 2014 ac maen nhw'n 20 y cant o'r Bil trydan nodweddiadol erbyn hyn. O ystyried bod chwarter o aelwydydd yng Nghymru yn byw mewn tlodi tanwydd, sut gallwn ni gyfiawnhau llwytho'r ffioedd hyn ar y bobl dlotaf a mwyaf agored i niwed mewn cymdeithas?
English: This is a man who voted in favour of privatising electricity and gas. That's the reason why prices have gone up. The fact is there's no real competition, people don't really understand how to get the best tariff, despite people's best endeavours to do that. In fact, the service was far better when we had a nationalised provider, and that is something I'd like to see return in the future. It's nothing to do with green taxes. It's all to do with the fact that private companies make profits on the back of ordinary people, something he supported and, in fact, that party over there supports as well.
Welsh: Dyma ddyn a bleidleisiodd o blaid preifateiddio trydan a nwy. Dyna'r rheswm pam mae prisiau wedi codi. Y ffaith yw nad oes unrhyw gystadleuaeth mewn gwirionedd, nid yw pobl wir yn deall sut i gael y tariff gorau, er gwaethaf ymdrechion gorau pobl i wneud hynny. A dweud y gwir, roedd y gwasanaeth yn well o lawer pan oedd gennym ni ddarparwr gwladoledig, ac mae hynny'n rhywbeth yr hoffwn ei weld yn dychwelyd yn y dyfodol. Nid yw'n ymwneud o gwbl â threthi gwyrdd. Mae'n ymwneud yn gyfan gwbl â'r ffaith fod cwmnïau preifat yn gwneud elw ar draul pobl gyffredin, rhywbeth y gwnaeth ef ei gefnogi ac, yn wir, y mae'r blaid yna draw fan acw yn ei gefnogi hefyd.
English: The First Minister, of course, did not answer the question. Five per cent of an electricity bill goes in profits to the electricity companies, 20 per cent in green taxes. So, the First Minister is completely wrong. But however bad things are at the minute, things are going to get worse, because the Office for Budget Responsibility forecasts, which accompanied the budget papers this year, show that environmental levies will rise from £10.7 billion this year to £13.5 billion by 2022. So, that means that green taxes will then be over £200 per annum for the average electricity user and a third of power bills. The introduction of smart meters is going to add another £11 billion to that. That's £84 a year extra for the next five years for every household. Also, an extra £2 billion is going to be spent on upgrading transmission lines and infrastructure to cater for remote windfarms. That adds another £25 per household. So, I repeat my question, which the First Minister didn't answer the first time around: how can we justify loading these charges upon the poorest and most vulnerable in society?
Welsh: Ni wnaeth y Prif Weinidog ateb y cwestiwn, wrth gwrs. Mae pump y cant o fil trydan yn mynd fel elw i'r cwmnïau trydan, 20 y cant mewn trethi gwyrdd. Felly, mae'r Prif Weinidog yn gwbl anghywir. Ond waeth pa mor ddrwg yw pethau ar y funud, mae pethau'n mynd i waethygu, gan fod rhagolygon y Swyddfa Cyfrifoldeb Cyllidebol, a ategodd y papurau cyllideb eleni, yn dangos y bydd ardollau amgylcheddol yn cynyddu o £10.7 biliwn eleni i £13.5 biliwn erbyn 2022. Felly, mae hynny'n golygu y bydd trethi gwyrdd dros £200 y flwyddyn erbyn hynny i'r defnyddiwr trydan cyffredin ac yn draean o filiau ynni. Mae cyflwyno mesuryddion clyfar yn mynd i ychwanegu £11 biliwn arall at hynny. Mae hynny'n £84 y flwyddyn yn ychwanegol dros y pum mlynedd nesaf i bob aelwyd. Hefyd, mae £2 biliwn ychwanegol yn mynd i gael ei wario ar uwchraddio llinellau trosglwyddo a seilwaith i ddarparu ar gyfer ffermydd gwynt o bell. Mae hynny'n ychwanegu £25 fesul aelwyd. Felly, ailadroddaf fy nghwestiwn, na atebodd y Prif Weinidog y tro cyntaf: sut allwn ni gyfiawnhau llwytho'r ffioedd hyn ar y bobl dlotaf a mwyaf agored i niwed mewn cymdeithas?
English: Well, I mean, first of all, I had some rumbling from the party opposite about the overcharging of customers - in 2015, when my party stood in the general election, they accused us of being Marxists for wanting to put a price cap on energy prices. That's how much they cared for ordinary people. We all know what the Tories are like. Now, in answer to the question posed by the leader of UKIP, every single method of generating energy costs money - every single method. Nuclear costs a great deal of money as well. Yes, we do want to make sure that we have cleaner, greener energy - it's good for energy security; why would we want to import energy from other countries when we can generate our own in a renewable way? Or is he saying is that we should just have coal-fired power stations absolutely everywhere and more opencast? Because that is the upshot of what he's saying.
Welsh: Wel, hynny yw, yn gyntaf oll, cefais rywfaint o achwyn gan y blaid gyferbyn am godi gormod ar gwsmeriaid - yn 2015, pan wnaeth fy mhlaid sefyll yn yr etholiad cyffredinol, fe'n cyhuddwyd ganddynt o fod yn Farcswyr am fod eisiau rhoi cap ar brisiau ynni. Dyna faint o ots oedd ganddyn nhw am bobl gyffredin. Rydym ni i gyd yn gwybod sut rai yw'r Torïaid. Nawr, i ateb y cwestiwn a ofynnwyd gan arweinydd UKIP, mae pob un dull o gynhyrchu ynni yn costio arian - pob un dull. Mae niwclear yn costio llawer iawn o arian hefyd. Ydym, rydym ni eisiau gwneud yn siŵr bod gennym ni ynni glanach, gwyrddach - mae o les i ddiogelwch ynni; pam y byddem ni eisiau mewnforio ynni o wledydd eraill a ninnau'n gallu cynhyrchu ynni ein hunain mewn modd adnewyddadwy? Neu a yw'n dweud y dylem ni gael gorsafoedd pŵer glo ym mhobman a mwy o gloddio glo brig? Oherwydd dyna ganlyniad yr hyn y mae'n ei ddweud.
English: He refuses to answer the question: how do we justify loading poor people with these excessive charges that are going to grow and grow with every year that passes? The OBR papers - the fiscal supplementary tables - following the budget show that the cost of the Climate Change Act 2008 in 2022 will be nearly £15 billion a year. And, over the next five years, the average household will be spending an enormous amount of its income on green taxes - £66 billion, £2,500 per household, over the next five years, will be taken from household budgets in green taxes. Green taxes are driving poor and vulnerable people into the red.
Welsh: Mae'n gwrthod ateb y cwestiwn: sut ydym ni'n cyfiawnhau llwytho pobl dlawd gyda'r ffioedd gormodol hyn sy'n mynd i dyfu a thyfu wrth i bob blwyddyn fynd heibio? Mae papurau'r OBR - y tablau atodol cyllidol - yn dilyn y gyllideb yn dangos y bydd cost Deddf Newid yn yr Hinsawdd 2008 yn 2022 bron i £15 biliwn y flwyddyn. A, thros y pum mlynedd nesaf, bydd y cartref cyffredin yn gwario swm enfawr o'i incwm ar drethi gwyrdd - bydd £66 biliwn, £2,500 yr aelwyd, dros y pum mlynedd nesaf, yn cael ei gymryd o gyllidebau aelwydydd mewn trethi gwyrdd. Mae trethi gwyrdd yn gyrru pobl dlawd ac agored i niwed i mewn i'r coch.
English: He talks about driving poor and vulnerable people into the red; the privatisation of energy was one way of doing that - we know that. His party stood on a programme of a flat tax, which would increase taxes for the vast majority of poorer people, and reduce them for people who are earning more. He's in no position to lecture anybody else about looking after poorer people. Let me ask him this - . At the end of the day, he doesn't believe in climate change. I do, he doesn't. I look at the science, he doesn't. That's the way that he sees it. I believe that cleaning up the environment costs money. The UK was a mess in the 1980s; it was filthy. The River Irwell in Salford would catch fire if you threw a match into it. Where I live in Bridgend, the River Ogmore would run different colours according to what had been chucked into it by whatever industry was upriver. Nobody says to me, 'I want to go back to those days where the environment was degraded, where the rivers were polluted, where the air was polluted', but it seems to be something that he's more than happy to see again.
Welsh: Mae'n sôn am yrru pobl dlawd ac agored i niwed i mewn i'r coch; roedd preifateiddio ynni yn un ffordd o wneud hynny - rydym ni'n gwybod hynny. Safodd ei blaid ef ar sail rhaglen o dreth safonol, a fyddai'n cynyddu trethi i'r mwyafrif helaeth o bobl dlotach, a'u lleihau i bobl sy'n ennill mwy. Nid yw mewn unrhyw sefyllfa i bregethu i unrhyw un arall am ofalu am bobl dlotach. Gadewch i mi ofyn hyn iddo - . Yn y pen draw, nid yw'n credu yn y newid yn yr hinsawdd. Rwyf i, nid yw ef. Rwyf i'n edrych ar y gwyddoniaeth, nid yw ef. Dyna'r ffordd y mae'n ei gweld hi. Rwy'n credu bod glanhau'r amgylchedd yn costio arian. Roedd y DU yn llanastr yn y 1980au; roedd yn fochaidd. Byddai'r afon Irwell yn Salford yn mynd ar dân pe byddech chi'n taflu matsien i mewn iddi. Lle'r wyf i'n byw ym Mhen-y-bont ar Ogwr, byddai'r afon Ogwr yn llifo mewn gwahanol liwiau yn dibynnu ar yr hyn oedd wedi cael ei daflu i mewn iddi gan ba bynnag ddiwydiant oedd i fyny'r afon. Nid oes neb yn dweud wrthyf, 'rwyf i eisiau mynd yn ôl i'r dyddiau hynny pan oedd yr amgylchedd wedi ei ddiraddio, pan oedd yr afonydd yn llygredig, pan oedd yr aer yn llygredig', ond mae'n ymddangos ei fod yn rhywbeth y mae ef yn fwy na hapus i'w weld eto.
English: A very topical question, if I may say. Through the Environment (Wales) Act 2016, the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 and the creation of Natural Resources Wales, we already have, of course, some of the most advanced environmental legislation and integrated enforcement arrangements in the world.
Welsh: Cwestiwn amserol iawn, os caf i ddweud. Trwy Ddeddf yr Amgylchedd (Cymru) 2016, Deddf Llesiant Cenedlaethau'r Dyfodol (Cymru) 2015 a chreu Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru, mae gennym ni eisoes, wrth gwrs, rywfaint o'r ddeddfwriaeth amgylcheddol a threfniadau gorfodi integredig mwyaf datblygedig yn y byd.
English: Thank you for that reply, First Minister. No less than eight wildlife and countryside charities in Wales have criticised cuts in the environment funding set out in the draft budget. WWF Cymru said that there is an apparent gap between your pledges on the environment and the reality of what's happening on the ground, while others have questioned whether the Welsh Government has provided sufficient resources to deliver legislation such as the environment and well-being of future generations Acts. What message does the First Minister think this cut in funding sends about his Government's commitment to protecting the environment in Wales?
Welsh: Diolch i chi am yr ateb yna, Prif Weinidog. Mae dim llai nag wyth o elusennau bywyd gwyllt a chefn gwlad yng Nghymru wedi beirniadu toriadau i gyllid amgylcheddol a nodwyd yn y gyllideb ddrafft. Dywedodd WWF Cymru ei bod yn ymddangos bod bwlch rhwng eich addewidion ar yr amgylchedd a realiti'r hyn sy'n digwydd ar lawr gwlad, tra bod eraill wedi cwestiynu a yw Llywodraeth Cymru wedi darparu adnoddau digonol i ddarparu deddfwriaeth fel Deddfau'r amgylchedd a llesiant cenedlaethau'r dyfodol. Pa neges y mae'r Prif Weinidog yn ei gredu y mae'r toriad hwn i gyllid yn ei anfon am ymrwymiad ei Lywodraeth i ddiogelu'r amgylchedd yng Nghymru?
English: If you look at the local authority environment and sustainable development single revenue grant, a total of £61.79 million has been allocated to the local authorities for 2017-18. That is something that is hugely important, on top of, of course, the spending that will come from Government. But, again, I say to him and his party, he is in no position to lecture us about money when, yet again, we have a budget that deprives Wales of money, that gives us a mere £200 million over four years to spend, where we end up in a position where we are 7 per cent worse off in real terms [ Interruption.] - I know it hurts, but you've got to listen - 7 per cent worse off in real terms since 2010, where, when Northern Ireland got £1.67 billion, they made no representations at all for Wales, and where Wales is so insignificant in their thinking, that the leader - and I feel sorry for him now - of the opposition is banned from sitting in the UK Cabinet, even as his Scottish colleague is there. And there they are, sitting lecturing us about standing up for Wales and making sure that we get more money for Wales. We'll do that; they will never do that.
Welsh: Os edrychwch chi ar grant refeniw sengl yr amgylchedd a datblygu cynaliadwy awdurdodau lleol, dyrannwyd cyfanswm o £61.79 miliwn i'r awdurdodau lleol ar gyfer 2017-18. Mae hynny'n rhywbeth sy'n hynod bwysig, yn ogystal, wrth gwrs, â'r gwariant a fydd yn dod gan y Llywodraeth. Ond, unwaith eto, dywedaf wrtho ef a'i blaid, nad yw mewn unrhyw sefyllfa i bregethu i ni am arian pan, unwaith eto, mae gennym ni gyllideb sy'n amddifadu Cymru o arian, sy'n rhoi dim ond £200 miliwn i ni i'w wario dros bedair blynedd, lle'r ydym ni'n canfod ein hunain mewn sefyllfa lle'r ydym ni 7 y cant yn waeth ein byd mewn termau real [ Torri ar draws.] - rwy'n gwybod ei fod yn brifo, ond mae'n rhaid i chi wrando - 7 y cant yn waeth ein byd mewn termau real ers 2010, lle, pan gafodd Gogledd Iwerddon £1.67 biliwn, ni wnaethon nhw unrhyw ddadleuon o gwbl dros Gymru, a lle mae Cymru mor ddibwys yn eu hystyriaethau, fel bod arweinydd yr wrthblaid - ac rwy'n teimlo trueni tuag ato erbyn hyn - wedi ei wahardd rhag eistedd yng Nghabinet y DU, er bod ei gydweithiwr o'r Alban yno. Ac dyna nhw, yn eistedd yn y fan yna yn pregethu wrthym ni am sefyll dros Gymru a gwneud yn siŵr ein bod ni'n cael mwy o arian i Gymru. Byddwn ni'n gwneud hynny; ni fyddan nhw byth yn gwneud hynny.
English: As we exit the European Union, an increasing number of people are concerned that we should retain the environmental laws that protect what you've just described - mainly the way that we have improved the environment here in Wales and in the UK. Now, on Monday, before the external affairs committee, you said that you had prepared a continuity Bill in case negotiations with the Westminster Government don't succeed in providing these protections that we're seeking. Don't you believe it would be appropriate for you to publish that continuity Bill in draft form now, as a public demonstration of your commitment to ensure that this legislation should remain as we exit the European Union?
Welsh: Wrth i ni adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, mae nifer cynyddol o bobl yn poeni ein bod ni'n cadw'r cyfreithiau amgylcheddol sydd yn amddiffyn yr hyn yr ydych chi newydd ei ddisgrifio - y ffordd yr ŷm ni wedi gwella'r amgylchedd yma yng Nghymru ac ym Mhrydain. Nawr, ddydd Llun, gerbron y pwyllgor materion allanol, fe ddywedoch chi eich bod chi wedi paratoi Bil parhad rhag ofn nad yw'r trafodaethau gyda Llywodraeth San Steffan yn llwyddo i ddarparu'r amddiffyn yma rydym ni'n chwilio amdano fe. Onid ydych chi'n teimlo y byddai fe'n briodol ichi gyhoeddi'r Bil parhad yna ar ffurf drafft nawr fel arwydd cyhoeddus o'ch ymrwymiad a'ch bwriad chi i sicrhau bod y ddeddfwriaeth yma'n parhau wrth ymadael â'r Undeb Ewropeaidd?
English: There is a Bill. There will be a decision about when it should be published. At present, what I would like to see is that the House of Commons accepts the amendments. If that does come to pass, then we won't need a continuity Bill, but it's true to say that one has been drafted.
Welsh: Mae yna Fil. Bydd yna benderfyniad ynglŷn â phryd y dylai'r Bil yna gael ei gyhoeddi. Ar hyn o bryd, beth hoffwn ei weld yw'r gwelliannau yn cael eu derbyn gan Dŷ'r Cyffredin. Os yw hynny'n wir, ni fydd eisiau cael Bil parhad, ond mae'n wir i ddweud bod un wedi cael ei ddrafftio.
English: First Minister, the Welsh Labour Government has shown that, through its proactive approach to regulation, enforcement and wider initiatives, great progress can be made to protect the Welsh environment. This is clearly evidenced in the Welsh Labour Government's proactive ambition for Wales to recycle 70 per cent of all waste by 2025 and zero waste by 2050, with over 60 per cent of our municipal waste in Wales currently being recycled. What further actions, therefore, can the Welsh Government take to enhance this fantastic and strategic achievement?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, mae Llywodraeth Lafur Cymru wedi dangos, drwy ei dull rhagweithiol o reoleiddio, gorfodi a mentrau ehangach, y gellir gwneud cynnydd mawr i ddiogelu amgylchedd Cymru. Gwelir hyn yn amlwg yn uchelgais rhagweithiol Llywodraeth Lafur Cymru i Gymru ailgylchu 70 y cant o'r holl wastraff erbyn 2025 a bod yn ddi-wastraff erbyn 2050, gyda dros 60 y cant o'n gwastraff dinesig yng Nghymru yn cael ei ailgylchu ar hyn o bryd. Pa gamau pellach, felly, all Llywodraeth Cymru eu cymryd i wella'r cyflawniad gwych a strategol hwn?
English: I pay credit to my colleague Lesley Griffiths and those who held the position before her for the fantastic work that's been done on recycling. Back in 2000, we recycled about 4 per cent of waste arisings in Wales. There are stretching targets for the future, but also we need to work with others to make sure that the level of packaging is reduced. It's difficult to do it at the Welsh level, because most of what comes into Wales is packaged and purchased elsewhere, but co-ordinated European action, indeed, worldwide action, to reduce packaging in the first place would reduce waste arisings and make it even easier for us to increase our level of recycling.
Welsh: Talaf deyrnged i'm cyd-Aelod Lesley Griffiths a'r rheini a oedd yn gwneud y swydd o'i blaen am y gwaith ardderchog a wnaed o ran ailgylchu. Yn ôl yn 2000, roeddem ni'n ailgylchu tua 4 y cant o sgil-gynhyrchion gwastraff yng Nghymru. Ceir targedau ymestynnol ar gyfer y dyfodol, ond mae angen hefyd i ni weithio gydag eraill i wneud yn siŵr bod llai o ddeunydd pacio. Mae'n anodd gwneud hynny ar lefel Cymru, gan fod y rhan fwyaf o'r hyn a ddaw i Gymru yn cael ei becynnu a'i brynu mewn mannau eraill, ond byddai gweithredu Ewropeaidd cydgysylltiedig, gweithredu byd-eang, yn wir, i leihau deunydd pacio yn y lle cyntaf yn lleihau sgil-gynhyrchion gwastraff ac yn ei gwneud yn haws fyth i ni gynyddu ein lefel o ailgylchu.
English: The former Minister for Skills and Science met with Damian Hinds, the Minister for employment, to discuss the DWP's estate plans, and he agreed to keep Welsh Government updated on any potential transfer of DWP functions from Gabalfa, and other locations, to a new hub north of Cardiff.
Welsh: Cafodd y cyn Weinidog Sgiliau a Gwyddoniaeth gyfarfod gyda Damian Hinds, y Gweinidog cyflogaeth, i drafod cynlluniau ystâd yr Adran Gwaith a Phensiynau, a chytunodd i roi'r wybodaeth ddiweddaraf i Lywodraeth Cymru am unrhyw drosglwyddo swyddogaethau posibl yr Adran Gwaith a Phensiynau o Gabalfa, a lleoliadau eraill, i ganolfan newydd i'r gogledd o Gaerdydd.