English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. The Minister talks about action; well, the farming community, Minister, want action from you. Now, the only area that I can agree that you spoke to this afternoon, Minister - and Jenny Rathbone - was that we all have a role in improving water quality. That's correct - all of us do, businesses and farmers included, and farmers accept that role. But any regulations have to be evidence based, proportionate and targeted, and the regulations that you have proposed and will be bringing forward next week are none of those things. Minister, it seems that you will bring forward these regulations next week to introduce a Wales-wide NVZ, and, in doing so, you have broken your commitment to Welsh farmers and this Senedd that you would not bring forward these regulations during the course of that pandemic, and I'm sure the First Minister and the health Minister will confirm to you that we are still in the middle of this pandemic. Now, I heard the contributions from Jenny Rathbone. I'm astonished. She talks about exaggeration. She talks about not being able to introduce zones. That's why they're called NVZs. This is done all over Europe. I can't believe that contribution from Jenny Rathbone. In regard to other Members, Janet Finch-Saunders and Llyr and others pointed out the devastating impact on farmers and the many businesses that will rely upon those farming businesses, the complex record keeping of regulations that will be subject to cross-compliance, inspection and the penalty, leaving little option but to resort to costly consultations that farming businesses simply cannot afford. As Janet Finch-Saunders and others pointed out, your own impact assessments talk about the upfront costs of £360 million to the industry, and then there's the evidence that shows that many catchments across Wales have incurred zero incidents of agricultural pollution over the last 10 years, and Llyr, of course, points correctly as well to the NRW evidence, which backs that up. Over the past 48 hours, I've had hundreds of e-mails f rom farmers across my own constituency in Montgomeryshire, urging me to vote against the regulations next week. Minister, you've heard from opposition parties, you've heard from the farming unions, you've heard from the farming community, and your response is, 'I'm going to ignore and carry on', which is so disappointing. I met with -
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Ddirprwy Lywydd. Mae'r Gweinidog yn sôn am weithredu; wel, mae'r gymuned ffermio, Weinidog, am eich gweld chi'n gweithredu. Nawr, yr unig faes y gallaf gytuno yn ei gylch y siaradoch chi amdano y prynhawn yma, Weinidog - a Jenny Rathbone - oedd bod gan bob un ohonom ran i'w chwarae yn y gwaith o wella ansawdd dŵr. Mae hynny'n gywir - mae gan bob un ohonom ran i'w chwarae, yn cynnwys busnesau a ffermwyr, ac mae ffermwyr yn derbyn y rôl honno. Ond mae'n rhaid i unrhyw reoliadau fod yn seiliedig ar dystiolaeth, yn gymesur ac wedi'u targedu, ac nid yw'r rheoliadau rydych wedi'u cynnig ac a gaiff eu cyflwyno yr wythnos nesaf yn ddim o'r pethau hynny. Weinidog, mae'n ymddangos y byddwch yn cyflwyno'r rheoliadau hyn yr wythnos nesaf i gyflwyno parth perygl nitradau Cymru gyfan, ac wrth wneud hynny, rydych wedi torri eich ymrwymiad i ffermwyr Cymru a'r Senedd hon na fyddech yn cyflwyno'r rheoliadau hyn yn ystod y pandemig, ac rwy'n siŵr y bydd y Prif Weinidog a'r Gweinidog iechyd yn cadarnhau ein bod yn dal i fod ynghanol y pandemig. Nawr, clywais gyfraniadau Jenny Rathbone. Cefais fy synnu. Mae'n sôn am orliwio. Mae'n sôn am fethu cyflwyno parthau. Dyna pam y cânt eu galw'n barthau perygl nitradau. Gwneir hyn ym mhob rhan o Ewrop. Ni allaf gredu'r cyfraniad hwnnw gan Jenny Rathbone. O ran yr Aelodau eraill, tynnodd Janet Finch-Saunders a Llyr ac eraill sylw at yr effaith ddinistriol ar ffermwyr a'r busnesau niferus a fydd yn dibynnu ar y busnesau ffermio hynny, y dulliau cymhleth o gadw cofnodion rheoliadau a fydd yn destun trawsgydymffurfio, arolygu a'r gosb, gan adael fawr o ddewis heblaw troi at ymgynghoriadau costus na all busnesau ffermio eu fforddio. Fel y nododd Janet Finch-Saunders ac eraill, mae eich asesiadau effaith eich hun yn sôn am y costau ymlaen llaw o £360 miliwn i'r diwydiant, ac yna ceir y dystiolaeth sy'n dangos bod llawer o ddalgylchoedd ledled Cymru heb weld unrhyw achosion o lygredd amaethyddol dros y 10 mlynedd diwethaf, ac mae Llyr, wrth gwrs, yn cyfeirio'n gywir hefyd at dystiolaeth Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru, sy'n cefnogi hynny. Dros y 48 awr ddiwethaf, cefais gannoedd o negeseuon e-bost gan ffermwyr ar draws fy etholaeth yn Sir Drefaldwyn, yn fy annog i bleidleisio yn erbyn y rheoliadau yr wythnos nesaf. Weinidog, rydych wedi clywed gan y gwrthbleidiau, rydych wedi clywed gan undebau ffermwyr, rydych wedi clywed gan y gymuned ffermio, a'ch ymateb yw, 'Rwy'n mynd i anwybyddu hynny a dal ati', sydd mor siomedig. Cyfarfûm â -