English: Thank you. Well, certainly, on your last point, I'd appreciate the help of all Members to make sure that we're able to communicate these messages with honesty and subtlety to constituents. There has been a somewhat hysterical tone amongst some political parties over the weekend to try to create some point-scoring, which I think is deeply inappropriate and doesn't help people to understand the nature of the problems that we are dealing with. So, I hope we won't see any more of that, and I'd be very happy to engage with all Members who are interested in a full and frank conversation about what's happening and the options as we go through them. This is something where party politics should have no place, in my view. In terms of the contingency plans, I'm happy to set them out for you by letter, but they are as they already stand: to warn and inform drivers of our advisory restrictions when they are required. As I said, they are required infrequently and, generally, for relatively short periods of time. And, as I said, we are working on a new contingency strategy to look at other options, which I'll keep Members fully updated about. In terms of when the bridge is likely to reopen without restrictions, well, I think that really does depend on the analysis of the state of the hangers. It's not for me to second guess the results of the engineering report, but in the event that all or many of the hangers need to be replaced, then clearly that's going to be a considerable piece of work. The 7.5 tonne restriction, I'd imagine, wouldn't be able to be lifted until the engineers were convinced that was safe. And given that there is concern about the brittle nature of the hangers, it would seem to me that it's premature to think about lifting restrictions altogether until that full assessment and work is carried out. I think I've answered the question about the lack of warning and the state of the bridge. There have been regular inspections, and these are industry standards. This is not something peculiar to the Menai bridge; this is what happens with other similar bridges. It is a higher standard of inspection than normal roads, and as well as being of a greater frequency, the checks taking place within the process are to a much higher and more thorough level, and the checking involved within the different agencies responsible and the companies and, separate to them, independent peer reviews is quite considerable. That's one of the reasons why it has taken so long, since the identification of the first problem in 2019, because this is a very thorough and methodical approach, done at arm's length from each other to make sure that it is robust. So, I think it would be unfair to represent this as a slow response to evidence of concern. I think this has been a thorough and methodical approach, in line with industry standard around the world, and that is the process that has shown us that there are problems that justify closing the bridge, so I think we've acted prudently and responsibly. But as I said in answer to Rhun ap Iorwerth, we will of course be conducting a lessons-learned exercise, to see if any mistakes were made that would have prevented us from getting to this position today. But I'm not aware of any that have come to light so far.
Welsh: Diolch. Wel, yn sicr, ar eich pwynt olaf, byddwn i'n gwerthfawrogi help pob Aelod i wneud yn siŵr ein bod ni'n gallu cyfathrebu'r negeseuon hyn gyda gonestrwydd a chynildeb i etholwyr. Mae naws gwyllt braidd wedi bod ymysg rhai pleidiau gwleidyddol dros y penwythnos i geisio creu rhywfaint o sgorio pwyntiau, sydd, yn fy marn i, yn amhriodol iawn ac nid yw'n helpu pobl i ddeall natur y problemau yr ydym ni'n delio â nhw. Felly, rwy'n gobeithio na fyddwn ni'n gweld mwy o hynny, a byddwn i'n hapus iawn i ymgysylltu â'r holl Aelodau sydd â diddordeb mewn sgwrs lawn a gonest am yr hyn sy'n digwydd a'r opsiynau wrth i ni fynd drwyddyn nhw. Mae hyn yn rhywbeth lle na ddylai fod unrhyw le i wleidyddiaeth bleidiol, yn fy marn i. O ran y cynlluniau wrth gefn, rwy'n hapus i'w cyflwyno nhw i chi drwy lythyr, ond maen nhw fel maen nhw'n sefyll eisoes: rhybuddio a hysbysu gyrwyr o'n cyfyngiadau cynghori pan fydd eu hangen. Fel y dywedais i, anaml mae eu hangen nhw a hynny, yn gyffredinol, am gyfnodau cymharol fyr. Ac, fel y dywedais i, rydym ni'n gweithio ar strategaeth wrth gefn newydd i edrych ar opsiynau eraill, a byddaf yn sicrhau bod yr Aelodau yn cael y wybodaeth ddiweddaraf amdanyn nhw. O ran pryd mae'r bont yn debygol o ailagor heb gyfyngiadau, wel, rwy'n credu bod hynny wir yn dibynnu ar y dadansoddiad o gyflwr yr hongwyr. Nid fy lle i yw dyfalu canlyniadau'r adroddiad peirianyddol, ond pa bai angen disodli pob un neu lawer o'r hongwyr, yna'n amlwg mae hynny'n mynd i fod yn ddarn sylweddol o waith. Ni fyddai'r cyfyngiad 7.5 tunnell, byddwn i'n dychmygu, yn gallu cael ei godi nes bod y peirianwyr yn argyhoeddedig bod hynny'n ddiogel. Ac o ystyried bod pryder am natur bregus yr hongwyr, mae'n ymddangos i mi ei bod hi'n rhy gynnar i feddwl am godi cyfyngiadau yn gyfan gwbl nes bod yr asesiad llawn a'r gwaith hwnnw'n cael ei wneud. Rwy'n meddwl mod i wedi ateb y cwestiwn am y diffyg rhybudd a chyflwr y bont. Mae archwiliadau rheolaidd wedi bod, ac mae'r rhain yn cyd-fynd â safonau'r diwydiant. Nid yw hyn yn rhywbeth arbennig i bont Menai; dyma sy'n digwydd gyda phontydd eraill tebyg. Mae'n safon arolygu uwch na ffyrdd arferol, ac yn ogystal â bod yn amlach, mae'r gwiriadau sy'n digwydd o fewn y broses i lefel llawer uwch a mwy trylwyr, ac mae'r gwirio sy'n gysylltiedig â'r gwahanol asiantaethau sy'n gyfrifol a'r cwmnïau ac, ar wahân iddyn nhw, adolygiadau annibynnol gan gymheiriaid yn eithaf sylweddol. Dyna un o'r rhesymau pam ei bod wedi cymryd cyhyd, ers nodi'r broblem gyntaf yn 2019, oherwydd mae hwn yn ddull trylwyr a threfnus iawn, wedi'i wneud hyd braich oddi wrth ei gilydd i wneud yn siŵr ei fod yn gadarn. Felly, rwy'n credu y byddai'n annheg cynrychioli hyn fel ymateb araf i dystiolaeth o bryder. Rwy'n credu bod hwn wedi bod yn ddull trylwyr a threfnus, yn unol â safon y diwydiant ledled y byd, a dyna'r broses sydd wedi dangos i ni fod yna broblemau sy'n cyfiawnhau cau'r bont, felly rwy'n credu ein bod ni wedi gweithredu'n ddoeth ac yn gyfrifol. Ond fel y dywedais i mewn ateb i Rhun ap Iorwerth, byddwn ni wrth gwrs yn cynnal ymarfer dysgu gwersi, i weld a wnaed unrhyw gamgymeriadau a fyddai wedi ein hatal rhag cyrraedd y sefyllfa hon heddiw. Ond dydw i ddim yn ymwybodol o unrhyw un sydd wedi dod i'r amlwg hyd yn hyn.