techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: We'll now move to a private session. So, in accordance with Standing Order 17.42 (vi), I propose that the committee resolves to exclude the public from item 4 of today's meeting. Is everyone content? I see you are. Thank you very much. So, we'll move into private session, therefore.
Welsh: Mi wnawn ni nawr symud i sesiwn breifat. Felly, yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 17.42 (vi), rydw i'n cynnig bod y pwyllgor yn penderfynu gwahardd y cyhoedd o'r cyfarfod ar gyfer eitem 4. Ydy pawb yn gytûn? Ie. Diolch yn fawr iawn. Mi wnawn ni symud i sesiwn breifat, felly.
English: Welcome all to the latest meeting of the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee here in the Senedd. Item 1 - introductions, apologies, substitutions and declarations of interest. I'm very pleased to welcome my fellow Members to the meeting of the health committee this morning. We've received apologies from Angela Burns, and Darren Millar will attend as a substitute on her behalf, and he's walking in promptly to the discussions. So, welcome, Darren. I can explain that the meeting, naturally, will be bilingual. Headphones can be used for simultaneous translation from Welsh to English on channel 1, or for amplification on channel 2. We're not expecting a fire alarm this morning, so, if there is a fire alarm, directions from the ushers should be followed in that regard. Does anyone have any interests to declare? No. All content.
Welsh: Croeso bawb i gyfarfod diweddaraf y Pwyllgor Iechyd, Gofal Cymdeithasol a Chwaraeon yma yn y Senedd. O dan eitem 1 - cyflwyniadau, ymddiheuriadau, dirprwyon a datgan buddiannau - dwi'n falch iawn o groesawu fy nghyd-Aelodau i gyfarfod y pwyllgor iechyd y bore yma. Dŷn ni wedi derbyn ymddiheuriad gan Angela Burns, a bydd Darren Millar yn dirprwyo ar ei rhan, ac mae e'n cerdded fewn yn brydlon iawn i'r trafodaethau. Croeso, Darren. A allaf bellach esbonio bod y cyfarfod yma yn naturiol ddwyieithog? Gellir defnyddio'r clustffonau i glywed cyfieithu ar y pryd o'r Gymraeg i'r Saesneg ar sianel 1, neu i glywed cyfraniadau yn yr iaith wreiddiol yn well ar sianel 2. Dŷn ni ddim yn disgwyl larwm tân y bore yma, felly, os bydd larwm tân yn canu, dylid dilyn cyfarwyddiadau'r tywyswyr yn hynny o beth. Oes gyda rhywun unrhyw fuddiant i'w ddatgan? Na. Pawb yn hapus.
English: Therefore, we move on to item 2, maternity services at Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board. This is an evidence session with David Jenkins. As background, of course, Members will be aware that we held a similar evidence gathering session with Mick Giannasi and Cath Broderick from the maternity services oversight panel during the summer term. Naturally, everybody will be aware of the background of what's been happening in the maternity services department in Cwm Taf, and, of course, we had another statement recently from the Minister here in the Senedd. Today, the committee will hear from David Jenkins, former chair of Aneurin Bevan Health Board. As you are aware, the Minister has asked him to support the chair of Cwm Taf Morgannwg in improving the effectiveness of board leadership and governance, and to advise the Minister himself of further actions needed to develop the board's governance and assurance arrangements. So, in that regard, a formal welcome to David Jenkins, independent adviser to Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board. Thank you very much for your written evidence beforehand, for your paper. That has helped us all in our questioning. So, we'll go straight into questions. Lynne Neagle is going to start.
Welsh: Reit, symudwn ni ymlaen i eitem 2, gwasanaethau mamolaeth ym Mwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Cwm Taf Morgannwg. Dyma sesiwn dystiolaeth gyda David Jenkins. Fel cefndir, wrth gwrs, bydd Aelodau yn ymwybodol ein bod wedi cynnal sesiwn casglu tystiolaeth tebyg gyda Mick Giannasi a Cath Broderick o'r panel goruchwylio gwasanaethau mamolaeth yn ystor tymor yr haf. Yn naturiol, mae pawb yn ymwybodol o'r cefndir ynglŷn â beth sydd wedi bod yn digwydd yn yr adran famolaeth ym Mwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Cwm Taf, ac, wrth gwrs, cawsom ddatganiad arall yn ddiweddar gan y Gweinidog yma yn y Senedd. Heddiw, bydd y pwyllgor yn clywed gan David Jenkins, cyn-gadeirydd Bwrdd Iechyd Aneurin Bevan. Fel dŷch chi'n ymwybodol, mae'r Gweinidog wedi gofyn iddo fe helpu cadeirydd Cwm Taf Morgannwg i wella effeithiolrwydd trefniadau arwain a llywodraethu'r bwrdd, a chynghori'r Gweinidog ei hun ar y camau gweithredu sydd eu hangen i ddatblygu trefniadau llywodraethu a sicrwydd y bwrdd. Felly, i'r perwyl yna, croeso yn ffurfiol i David Jenkins, cynghorydd annibynnol i Fwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Cwm Taf Morgannwg. Diolch yn fawr iawn i chi am eich tystiolaeth ysgrifenedig ymlaen llaw, am eich papur. Mae hynna wedi bod yn help i bawb yn eu cwestiynu. Ac, felly, awn ni'n syth fewn i'r cwestiynau, a dweud y gwir. Lynne Neagle sy'n mynd i ddechrau.
English: Okay. Thank you very much. I think we've come to the end of our questions. So, thank you very much for being here this morning. Thank you also for the paper you submitted beforehand. Can I further confirm that you will receive a transcript of these discussions in order for you to check that they're factually accurate and correct? So, with those few words, thank you very much, and that's the end of that item.
Welsh: Ocê. Diolch yn fawr. Rwy'n credu dŷn ni wedi dod i ddiwedd y cwestiynu. Felly, diolch yn fawr iawn am eich presenoldeb y bore yma. Diolch yn fawr hefyd am y papur y gwnaethoch chi ei ddarparu ymlaen llaw. Gallaf i gadarnhau y byddwch chi'n derbyn trawsgrifiad o'r trafodaethau yma er mwyn i chi allu gwirio eu bod nhw'n gadarnhaol ac yn ffeithiol gywir. Gyda chymaint â hynny o ragymadrodd, diolch yn fawr iawn ichi, a dyna ddiwedd yr eitem yna.
English: Moving on to item 3, which is papers to note, Members will have already read the supplementary information from the Board of Community Health Councils regarding the Health and Social Care (Quality and Engagement) (Wales) Bill. Are you happy to note that?
Welsh: Symud ymlaen i eitem 3 a phapurau i'w nodi, bydd Aelodau wedi darllen y wybodaeth ychwanegol gan y Bwrdd Cynghorau Iechyd Cymuned ynghylch y Bil Iechyd a Gofal Cymdeithasol (Ansawdd ac Ymgysylltu) (Cymru). Hapus i nodi hwnna?
English: Item 4 is a motion under Standing order 17.42 (vi) to resolve to exclude the public from the remainder of the meeting. Is everyone content? Yes, therefore we will move into private session.
Welsh: Eitem 4, a chynnig o dan Reol Sefydlog 17.42 (vi) i benderfynu gwahardd y cyhoedd o weddill y cyfarfod yma. Pawb yn gytûn? Cytuno, felly awn ni i mewn i sesiwn breifat.
English: As it does state that Wales is a truly bilingual country, I am going to speak in Welsh.
Welsh: Gan fod o'n dweud bod Cymru'n wlad wirioneddol ddwyieithog, dwi'n mynd i siarad yn Gymraeg.
English: I think it's too prescriptive in parts. I think there is too much detail as to what they are going to do in some areas. For example, the section on - . Sorry. There are sections that state exactly what is going to happen. I think that they need to take a step back and they need to be more general, to give more freedom, because there is too much detail here. But I think you can maintain focus, because you're going to be stronger in saying how you're going to reach decisions, rather than simply stating exactly what you're going to do. I think Rachel would agree with that in terms of the kind of criteria and the kind of approach, because things are going to change. The nations that you want to work with will change. But if we know what the underpinning principles are for decisions, then it gives you far more flexibility rather than saying what specific plans are or what kind of specific collaboration is going to happen.
Welsh: Dwi'n meddwl ei bod hi'n rhy prescriptive mewn rhannau. Dwi'n meddwl bod yna ormod o fanylion am beth maen nhw'n mynd i'w wneud mewn rhai meysydd. So, er enghraifft, yr adran ar - . Sori. Mae yna adrannau sy'n dweud yn union pa fath o weithredu sy'n mynd i ddigwydd. Dwi'n meddwl bod angen cymryd cam yn ôl, bod angen bod yn fwy cyffredinol, i roi mwy o ryddid, achos bod gorfanylu fan hyn. Ond dwi'n meddwl eich bod chi'n dal yn gallu cael ffocws, achos rydych chi'n mynd i fod yn gryfach yn dweud sut rydych chi'n mynd i ddod i benderfyniadau, yn hytrach na pa fath o weithredu rydych chi eisiau'i wneud. Dwi'n meddwl bod Rachel yn cytuno efo hynny o ran y math o criteria a'r math o approach, achos mae pethau efallai'n mynd i newid. Mae'r gwledydd rydych chi eisiau gweithio efo nhw'n mynd i newid. Ond os ydym ni'n gwybod beth ydy'r egwyddorion y tu ôl i benderfyniadau, mae'n rhoi llawer mwy o hyblygrwydd yn hytrach na beth ydy'r cynllunio [cywiriad: cynlluniau] penodol neu pa fath o gydweithio penodol iawn sy'n mynd i fod.
English: It is a challenge, I think, to know what kind of nation you want to convey for this type of strategy. Some people have told me, and I do agree with them, that it's good to see something that's trying to be forward-looking about the type of nation we want to be. But also there's an acknowledgement of the Welsh language and so forth. So, perhaps one question is, if we emphasise this history of international relations and establishing international organisations, then the result you would expect would be looking for a greater influencing power, and that's where we see a gap in the strategy. And the other issue to raise, I think - . Well, two other things - one thing that I could say is that we have been one of the earliest nations involved in the industrial revolution. Well, that again places a duty upon us to do more internationally in terms of climate change. And there is a gap in the strategy in that regard also. The other issue is the lack of co-ordination with strategies already in existence. So, as far as I know, there is a strategy about sport and so forth that is being developed, but we don't see that here. So, once again, there is a means of bringing things together in a clearer manner to encompass what we want to cover in this type of strategy, and that's drawing on things that already exist and will be developed. And then the aim could be to say where we want to go with these things.
Welsh: Mae'n her, dwi'n meddwl, onid ydy: pa fath o genedl rydych chi eisiau ei chyfleu ar gyfer y math yma o strategaeth. Mae rhai pobl wedi dweud wrthyf fi, a dwi'n cytuno â nhw, ei bod hi'n braf gweld rhywbeth sy'n trio edrych ymlaen ynglŷn â'r math o genedl rydym ni eisiau bod. Ond hefyd mae yna gydnabyddiaeth o'r Gymraeg ac yn y blaen hefyd. Efallai un cwestiwn ydy, os ydym ni'n pwysleisio'r hanes yma o ymwneud yn rhyngwladol a datblygu sefydliadau rhyngwladol, y canlyniad y byddwch chi'n ei ddisgwyl byddai mwy o rôl ceisio dylanwadu, a dyna lle rydym ni'n gweld bwlch yn y strategaeth. A mater arall, dwi'n meddwl, i'w godi ydy - . Dau beth arall - un peth arall buaswn i'n gallu ei ddweud ydy ein bod ni wedi bod yn un o'r cenhedloedd cyntaf yn y chwyldro diwydiannol. Eto, mae hwnna'n rhoi dyletswydd arnon ni i wneud mwy yn rhyngwladol o ran newid hinsawdd. Ond mae yna ryw fwlch yn y strategaeth o ran hynny hefyd. Mater arall, dwi'n meddwl, ydy'r diffyg cydlynu efo strategaethau sy'n bodoli'n barod. Felly, o'r hyn dwi'n ei ddeall, mae yna strategaeth ynglŷn â chwaraeon ac yn y blaen yn cael ei datblygu, ond dydym ni ddim yn gweld hyn fan hyn. Felly, eto, mae modd dod â phethau at ei gilydd yn fwy eglur i gyfannu'n well yn y math o strategaeth sydd gennym ni, dwi'n meddwl, gan dynnu'r pethau sydd eisoes yn bodoli ac yn mynd i gael eu datblygu. Ac efallai nod sydd wedyn yn dweud, 'Dyma lle rydym ni eisiau mynd efo'r pethau yma'.
English: Thank you, Chair. In terms of item 2, I have to declare an interest as a GP who in the past has paid an indemnity personally, even though I have no direct interest in this matter because the indemnity is now dealt with at practice level, not on a personal level.
Welsh: Diolch, Cadeirydd. Ynglŷn ag eitem 2, mae'n rhaid imi ddatgan buddiant fel meddyg teulu sydd yn y gorffennol wedi talu indemniant yn bersonol, er nad oes budd uniongyrchol gyda fi yn y mater penodol dan sylw gan fod yr indemniad yn cael ei ddatrys ar lefel y practis bellach ac nid ar lefel bersonol.
English: Thank you, Chair. Moving on just to more technical issues regarding these powers, may I ask you whether you're content with the balance of powers in terms of the detail of the Bill and what is left to regulations, and why? The balance between the detail and what is left to regulations - how was that balance determined?
Welsh: Diolch, Cadeirydd. Symud ymlaen jest i faterion dyfnach technegol o'r pwerau dirprwyedig, allaf i ofyn ichi ydych chi'n fodlon â chydbwysedd y pwerau, o ran manylion y Bil a'r hyn sydd yn weddill ar gyfer y rheoliadau, a pham? Y cydbwysedd rhwng manylion â'r hyn sy'n weddill ar gyfer rheoliadau - sut daethoch chi i benderfynu ar y cydbwysedd yna?
English: Thank you for that. Now, the power to establish a direct indemnity scheme is a discretionary power. What consideration did you as a Minister give to making this power a duty on Welsh Ministers?
Welsh: Diolch am hynna. Nawr, mae'r pŵer i sefydlu cynllun indemniad uniongyrchol yn bŵer dewisol. Pa ystyriaeth a wnaethoch chi ei rhoi fel Gweinidog i wneud y pŵer hwn yn ddyletswydd ar Weinidogion Cymru?
English: Thank you. The next technical question is: when will regulations establishing a direct indemnity scheme be brought forward? When will those regulations be introduced?
Welsh: Diolch. Y cwestiwn technegol nesaf ydy: pryd y bydd rheoliadau sy'n sefydlu cynllun indemniad uniongyrchol yn cael eu cyflwyno? Pryd y bydd rheoliadau yna'n cael eu cyflwyno?
English: Right. Thank you for that. Have you, Minister, given consideration to including on the face of the Bill a duty to consult stakeholders prior to any regulations being made?
Welsh: Reit. Diolch am hynna. Ydych chi, Weinidog, wedi ystyried cynnwys dyletswydd ar wyneb y Bil i ymgynghori â rhanddeiliaid cyn gwneud unrhyw reoliadau?
English: And the final question from me is: given the significance of the power to establish a direct indemnity scheme by regulations and the non-exhaustive list of what such a scheme may specify or require, as set out in section 1 (8) of the Bill, why aren't the regulations subject to the affirmative procedure?
Welsh: A'r cwestiwn olaf gennyf i ydy: o ystyried arwyddocâd y pŵer i sefydlu cynllun indemniad uniongyrchol gan reoliadau a'r rhestr nad yw'n gynhwysfawr o'r hyn y gall cynllun o'r fath ei nodi neu ei fynnu, fel y nodir yn adran 1 (8) o'r Bil, pam nad yw'r rheoliadau'n ddarostyngedig i'r weithdrefn gadarnhaol?
English: Thank you very much, Chair. May I ask to what extent have you, as Minister, taken human rights into consideration in preparing the Bill?
Welsh: Diolch, Gadeirydd. A allaf i ofyn i ba raddau rydych chi fel Gweinidog wedi ystyried hawliau dynol wrth baratoi'r Bil?
English: Thank you for that. The next question from me is that the equality impact assessment states that race is said to include different ethnic minorities, Gypsies and Travellers and migrants, asylum seekers and refugees, and goes on to say that the proposal has no impact on matters of race. Now, in evidence to the Climate Change, Environment and Rural Affairs Committee, circus representatives and supporters have queried whether there may be discrimination on the grounds of race. So, why is it that the EIA in relation to the Bill does not identify any positive or negative implications of the Bill with regard to race?
Welsh: Diolch am hynna. Y cwestiwn nesaf ydy: mae'r asesiad o'r effaith ar gydraddoldeb yn nodi y dywedir bod hil yn cynnwys gwahaniaethau ethnig gwahanol, Sipsiwn a Theithwyr ac ymfudwyr, ceiswyr lloches a ffoaduriaid, ac aiff ymlaen i ddweud nad yw'r cynnig yn cael unrhyw effaith ar faterion sy'n ymwneud â hil. Nawr, mewn tystiolaeth i'r Pwyllgor Newid Hinsawdd, Amgylchedd a Materion Gwledig, mae cynrychiolwyr a chefnogwyr syrcas yn cwestiynu a allai fod gwahaniaethu ar sail hil. Pam nad yw'r asesiad o effaith ar gydraddoldeb mewn perthynas â'r Bil yn nodi unrhyw oblygiadau cadarnhaol neu negyddol y Bil i hil?
English: Thank you. And then the next question is: some individuals who've submitted evidence to the climate Change, Environment and Rural Affairs Committee highlight what they consider to be animal welfare concerns, or a lack of animal welfare concerns, where the use of wild animals in circuses is concerned. Why have you, Minister, decided to bring the Bill forward on ethical grounds rather than animal welfare grounds?
Welsh: Diolch. A'r cwestiwn nesaf ydy: mae rhai unigolion sydd wedi cyflwyno tystiolaeth i'r Pwyllgor Newid Hinsawdd, Amgylchedd a Materion Gwledig yn tynnu sylw at yr hyn y maent yn ei ystyried yn bryderon o ran lles anifeiliaid, neu ddiffyg pryderon o ran lles anifeiliaid, lle mae defnyddio anifeiliaid gwyllt mewn syrcasau dan sylw. Pam fod y Gweinidog wedi penderfynu dwyn y Bil ymlaen ar sail foesegol yn hytrach nag ar sail lles anifeiliaid?
English: Thank you very much for that. And then the final question from me: why did you decide, as a Minister, on 1 December 2020 as the date on which the Bill will come into force? Why was this specific date chosen?
Welsh: Diolch am hynna. A'r cwestiwn olaf gen i: pam wnaethoch chi benderfynu fel Gweinidog ar 1 Rhagfyr 2020 fel y dyddiad dod i rym ar gyfer y Bil? Pam y dewiswyd y dyddiad penodol hwnnw?
English: The first item on our agenda this afternoon is questions to the First Minister, and the first question is from Mick Antoniw.
Welsh: Yr eitem gyntaf ar ein hagenda ni y prynhawn yma yw'r cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog, ac mae'r cwestiwn cyntaf gan Mick Antoniw.
English: Llywydd, discussions have been held between the Welsh Government and the Department for Transport, and other departments in UK Government, regarding the freight capacity framework agreement, although these were often late in the procurement process. That process was undertaken solely by the UK Department for Transport.
Welsh: Llywydd, mae trafodaethau wedi eu cynnal rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru a'r Adran Drafnidiaeth, ac adrannau eraill yn Llywodraeth y DU, ynghylch y cytundeb fframwaith capasiti cludo nwyddau, er bod y rhain yn aml yn hwyr yn y broses gaffael. Dim ond Adran Drafnidiaeth y DU wnaeth gymryd rhan yn y broses honno.
English: Thank you for that answer, First Minister. Each year, Welsh ports, as you know, handle 48 million tonnes of freight. They carry 2.5 million passengers. They employ 6,000 people, including 1,000 seafarers, and it's worth £1 billion a year to the Welsh economy. The Government's Brexit mismanagement is likely to turn into a disaster for the Welsh economy and for Welsh jobs. So, if there is no deal, the freight capacity framework agreement is a potential charter for workers' exploitation, and already companies like Irish Ferries and Fastnet Line, have been named by trade unions such as the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers as the 'ships of shame', because of they're non-recognition of trade unions and exploitative rates of pay below the UK minimum wage. Now, if there is a deal, First Minister, the new Tory Siegfried line that will be the customs border down the middle of the Irish sea will lead to companies bypassing Welsh ports as they head tariff-free to the European Union. So, under the Tories' Brexit arrangements, First Minister, Welsh workers face either exploitation or unemployment. So, will you, as First Minister, meet with me, and with RMT, to discuss the steps that Welsh Government can take to protect Welsh workers and Welsh ports?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb yna, Prif Weinidog. Bob blwyddyn, mae porthladdoedd Cymru, fel y gwyddoch, yn ymdrin â 48 miliwn tunnell o nwyddau. Maen nhw'n cario 2.5 miliwn o deithwyr. Maen nhw'n cyflogi 6,000 o bobl, gan gynnwys 1,000 o forwyr, ac mae'n werth £1 filiwn y flwyddyn i economi Cymru. Mae camreolaeth y Llywodraeth o Brexit yn debygol o droi'n drychineb i economi Cymru ac i swyddi yng Nghymru. Felly, os na fydd cytundeb, mae'r cytundeb fframwaith capasiti cludo nwyddau yn siarter bosibl i gamfanteisio ar weithwyr, ac enwyd cwmnïau fel Irish Ferries a Fastnet Line eisoes gan undebau llafur fel Undeb Cenedlaethol y Gweithwyr Rheilffordd, Morwrol a Thrafnidiaeth fel y 'llongau cywilydd', oherwydd eu diffyg cydnabyddiaeth o undebau llafur a chyfraddau cyflog camfanteisiol sy'n is nag isafswm cyflog y DU. Nawr, os bydd cytundeb, Prif Weinidog, bydd llinell Siegfried newydd y Torïaid a fydd yn gweithredu fel y ffin dollau i lawr canol Môr Iwerddon yn peri i gwmnïau osgoi porthladdoedd Cymru wrth iddyn nhw allu mynd yn ddi-dariff i'r Undeb Ewropeaidd. Felly, o dan drefniadau Brexit y Torïaid, Prif Weinidog, mae gweithwyr Cymru yn wynebu naill ai camfanteisio neu ddiweithdra. Felly, a wnewch chi, fel Prif Weinidog, gyfarfod â mi, a chydag RMT, i drafod y camau y gall Llywodraeth Cymru eu cymryd i amddiffyn gweithwyr Cymru a phorthladdoedd Cymru?
English: First Minister, I think it is essential that the freight capacity framework agreement can provide Government departments with the ability to secure freight capacity for supply chains between the UK and the EU. But it's also important to improve cross-border freight capacity between Wales and England. And I noticed during the evidence gathering for the Marches and mid Wales freight strategy, which was published last year, that the business community outlined the opportunities for greater domestic food production. I also say that in the context of the importance of agriculture to areas of Wales such as my constituency. They also stressed the importance of interventions that would increase the capacity of the road network in mid Wales, for better flow into the midlands. So, can I ask what specific discussions you've had with the UK Government in regard to better flow of freight between Wales and England, in the context of the points that I've raised?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n hanfodol bod y cytundeb fframwaith capasiti cludo nwyddau yn gallu rhoi'r gallu i adrannau Llywodraeth sicrhau capasiti cludo nwyddau ar gyfer cadwyni cyflenwi rhwng y DU a'r UE. Ond mae hefyd yn bwysig gwella capasiti cludo nwyddau ar draws y ffin rhwng Cymru a Lloegr. A sylwais yn ystod y broses o gasglu tystiolaeth ar gyfer strategaeth cludo nwyddau y Gororau a chanolbarth Cymru, a gyhoeddwyd y llynedd, bod y gymuned fusnes yn amlinellu'r cyfleoedd i gynhyrchu mwy o fwyd yn ddomestig. Rwyf i hefyd yn dweud hynny yng nghyd-destun pwysigrwydd amaethyddiaeth i ardaloedd o Gymru fel fy etholaeth i. Fe wnaethon nhw bwysleisio hefyd bwysigrwydd ymyraethau a fyddai'n cynyddu capasiti'r rhwydwaith ffyrdd yn y canolbarth, i sicrhau llif gwell i ganolbarth Lloegr. Felly, a gaf i ofyn pa drafodaethau penodol yr ydych chi wedi eu cael gyda Llywodraeth y DU ynglŷn â llif gwell o ran cludo nwyddau rhwng Cymru a Lloegr, yng nghyd-destun y pwyntiau yr wyf i wedi eu codi?