English: I thank the First Minister for his response. The legal position, at least the position that was sent to me in correspondence, has, however, changed. Initially, the focus was that the UK Government could do it because it was the charging authority, but actually the UK Government isn't seeking to enforce on our side of the road, and it would need to enforce, and there are real difficulties in doing that in a later Act. There are three different arguments, any one of which would be fatal to the UK Government's position. So, they're looking to either use the current toll plaza despite the Government of Wales Act saying it's our right to enforce on roads in Wales, or they're looking at investing in a free-flow scheme - a lot of capital - without legal certainty that if someone goes through and doesn't pay, they chase them for the debt, they have to go to court, and unless they can know with certainty that that court is going to say, 'Yes, that is a valid charge', then it's incredibly difficult for them to invest in that scheme. The frustration that I have over this is that there's this fixed sum of, I think, £75 million or so that the UK Government says, it would raise that and we'd just beat it, but it would raise that within a year or so of continued tolling. Then it says that the continued operation and maintenance cost is about £15 million a year, but much of that is actually the operation of the tolls itself. So, we're perhaps looking at a sum of around half that. While it's not our ideal scenario, would the First Minister consider that it might be better than nothing if tolling continued just for a further year, and if thereafter we were able to make a modest contribution of perhaps £2 million or £3 million to the tolling cost, does he think that would be a deal worth having in order to get rid of those tolls? And will he work with parties across the Chamber to try and agree that?
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Prif Weinidog am ei ymateb. Fodd bynnag, mae'r sefyllfa gyfreithiol, y sefyllfa a anfonwyd ataf i mewn gohebiaeth o leiaf, wedi newid. I ddechrau, y pwyslais oedd y gallai Llywodraeth y DU ei wneud gan mai hi oedd yr awdurdod codi tâl, ond mewn gwirionedd nid yw Llywodraeth y DU yn ceisio gorfodi ar ein hochr ni o'r ffordd, a byddai angen iddi orfodi, a cheir anawsterau gwirioneddol o ran gwneud hynny mewn Deddf ddiweddarach. Ceir tair gwahanol ddadl, y byddai unrhyw un ohonynt yn angheuol i safbwynt Llywodraeth y DU. Felly, maen nhw'n ceisio defnyddio'r cabanau tollau presennol er gwaethaf y ffaith fod Deddf Llywodraeth Cymru yn dweud mai ein hawl ni yw gorfodi ar ffyrdd yng Nghymru, neu maen nhw'n ystyried buddsoddi mewn cynllun llif rhydd - llawer o gyfalaf - heb sicrwydd cyfreithiol, os bydd rhywun yn mynd trwodd ac nad yw'n talu, eu bod yn mynd ar eu holau am y ddyled, mae'n rhaid iddyn nhw fynd i'r llys, ac oni bai y gallant wybod gyda sicrwydd bod y llys yn mynd i ddweud, 'Ydy, mae honna'n ffi ddilys', yna mae'n arbennig o anodd iddyn nhw fuddsoddi yn y cynllun hwnnw. Y rhwystredigaeth sydd gennyf i ynghylch hyn yw bod swm sefydlog yma, rwy'n meddwl, o tua £75 miliwn y mae Llywodraeth y DU yn dweud y byddai'n ei godi ac y byddem ni'n gwella ar hynny, ond byddai'n codi hynny o fewn tua blwyddyn o godi tollau parhaus. Wedyn mae'n dweud bod y gost o weithredu a chynnal a chadw parhaus tua £15 miliwn y flwyddyn, ond gweithrediad y tollau eu hunain yw llawer o hynny mewn gwirionedd. Felly, rydym ni'n edrych efallai ar swm o tua hanner hynny. Er nad dyna ein sefyllfa ddelfrydol, a wnaiff y Prif Weinidog ystyried y gallai fod yn well na dim, pe byddai codi tollau yn parhau dim ond am flwyddyn arall, a phe gallem ni wneud cyfraniad cymedrol ar ôl hynny o tua £2 filiwn neu £3 miliwn efallai i'r gost o godi tollau, a yw'n credu y byddai hwnnw'n gytundeb gwerth ei gael er mwyn cael gwared ar y tollau hynny? Ac a wnaiff ef weithio gyda phartïon ar draws y Siambr i geisio cytuno ar hynny?