English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer, and thank you, Minister, for your statement. I have to say that I'm disappointed with much of what you said. There was a lot of criticism of the Conservative Party, which, of course, has been a party that has tried, as much as it possibly can, to have delivered Brexit and gotten a withdrawal deal through the House of Commons. You've said that you don't like the fact that there's uncertainty and a deadlock, but, at every opportunity that there's been in the House of Commons to vote for a withdrawal deal that would prevent a disorderly and chaotic Brexit, the Labour Party have voted against it. Ninety per cent of Conservative MPs - [ Interruption.] Ninety per cent of Conservative MPs have always, consistently, voted for that withdrawal deal, unlike 100 per cent, or almost 100 per cent, of the Labour MPs, who have voted against. So, you've had it within your gift as a party to deliver a Brexit with a deal that honours the outcome of the referendum result, and I think many people will find it pretty extraordinary that, in the wake of the EU election results, which saw a third of the vote - including some our vote, much of it your vote too - drift to the Brexit Party, which clearly wants to simply deliver Brexit - . Now, you made reference in your statement to the fact that there are many of those who voted for Brexit in 2016 who are now supporting 'no deal' and many, probably a majority, wanting to remain, and that some people have switched their view. In my experience, most people have switched their view in the opposite direction, because they respect democracy, unlike, it would appear to me, the Welsh Government. The fact is that the people of Wales voted to leave the European Union, in a referendum. There was a debate that was conducted. I was concerned at times about the quality of that debate on both sides of the argument, but, at the end of that debate - at the end of that debate - the people of Wales voted to leave. And there has not been a single referendum, ever, in the history of our nation, where the outcome of that referendum has not been implemented. And I think that it's our duty as politicians to listen to the public when we give them the opportunity to have their say, and to implement the outcome of those votes. Now, you made reference as well in your statement to the fact that the CBI has expressed concern that we might be leaving the European Union without a deal. You seem to listen to the CBI when it suits you, and to ignore them when it doesn't suit you, as we've seen in terms of the M4 relief road today, and, indeed, in terms of their view on the withdrawal agreement, because, of course, they supported the withdrawal agreement that you all voted against. So, you can't have it all ways, simply selectively quoting individuals when their view has been quite clear about the Prime Minister's withdrawal deal, because they had a very clear view, and that was to support that deal in order to avoid a disorderly Brexit. Now, let me make it quite clear that, our benches, we want a deal. We want a good deal. But, if that cannot be secured, then we are prepared to support a 'no deal' scenario, because we must be prepared to walk away - [ Interruption.] You must be prepared to walk away if the deal is not good enough. Now, it's quite clear - [ Interruption.] It's quite clear that the current withdrawal deal, the current withdrawal agreement, cannot command a majority in the House of Commons. It's been put to the House of Commons on many occasions. So, it cannot command a majority in its current form, and who knows what the position might be after we have a change of Prime Minister. But one thing is for certain, and that is that we must respect the outcome in terms of the referendum. Now, I was pleased with one part of your statement, and that was the end - not just in terms of you concluding what you were saying, but in terms of the fact that you were referring to some of the responsible behaviour that you are taking as a Government in order to prepare for the possibility of a 'no deal' Brexit. Now, as I say, I don't want to see a 'no deal' Brexit, I would far rather that we have a good trade deal with the European Union, but it seems to me that there's a lot of intransigence on the European side of the debate, where people simply do not want to give us a good deal, and that may well lead to us coming out of the EU without one. So, it's very important to make sure that we do obviously have some proper preparations in place. And I'm pleased to see that you are taking that risk much more seriously and have been since the start of this year in terms of preparing for a 'no deal'. Now, can I ask - ? You've allocated in the past sums of money to prepare for a 'no deal' Brexit, including to various projects and activities around Government. Can I ask you whether you're going to increase that sum, given the approaching date of 31 October, and, if so, what activity you're expecting to fund from it? Because I think it is important that we understand more precisely the activity that you want to promote. Can you also tell us: in terms of the projects that have already been funded as a result of the EU transition funding, in terms of the people actually tapping into those funds, do you have a geographic distribution within Wales where you can map exactly the interest and the engagement? Because I think what concerns me, if there is going to be a 'no deal' Brexit - and, as I say, I want to avoid that, but, if there is, we need to make sure that all parts of Wales and all industries within Wales are prepared for that possibility and that eventuality. So, I would appreciate some updates on that in particular. I welcome what you said, as I say, about the range of activity that's going on and the serious preparations that are now being undertaken, but I do regret that you're in a party now that is supporting a second referendum, which is talking about campaigning to remain in that referendum, and ignoring, effectively, the outcome of the first vote. I put it to you that you are a party that has consistently in the past implemented the outcome of referendums whether you've liked the outcome or not, and you've been on different sides of referendums: some you've won, some you've lost, historically. What's so different about this one? I just do not get it.
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd, a diolch, Gweinidog, am eich datganiad. Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud fy mod yn siomedig gyda llawer o'r hyn a wnaethoch chi ei ddweud. Roedd llawer o feirniadu ar y Blaid Geidwadol, sydd, wrth gwrs, wedi bod yn blaid sydd wedi ceisio, gymaint ag y gall, gyflawni Brexit ac sydd wedi llywio cytundeb ymadael drwy Dŷ'r Cyffredin. Rydych chi wedi dweud nad ydych chi'n hoffi'r ffaith bod ansicrwydd ac anghytundeb llwyr, ond, ar bob cyfle a gafwyd yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin i bleidleisio dros gytundeb ymadael a fyddai'n atal Brexit anhrefnus a dryslyd, mae'r Blaid Lafur wedi pleidleisio yn ei erbyn. Mae 90 y cant o Aelodau Seneddol Ceidwadol - [ Torri ar draws.] Mae 90 y cant o ASau Ceidwadol bob amser wedi pleidleisio o blaid y cytundeb ymadael hwnnw, yn wahanol i 100 y cant, neu bron i 100 y cant, o'r ASau Llafur, sydd wedi pleidleisio yn erbyn. Felly, roedd gennych chi fodd fel plaid i gyflwyno Brexit gyda chytundeb sy'n anrhydeddu canlyniad y refferendwm, ac rwy'n credu y bydd llawer o bobl yn ei chael hi'n eithaf rhyfeddol, yn sgil canlyniadau etholiad yr UE, a welodd draean o'r bleidlais - gan gynnwys rhai o'n pleidleisiau ni, a llawer o'ch pleidleisiau chi hefyd - yn llithro i'r Blaid Brexit, sy'n amlwg eisiau cyflawni Brexit - . Nawr, fe wnaethoch chi gyfeirio yn eich datganiad at y ffaith bod llawer o'r rhai a bleidleisiodd o blaid Brexit yn 2016 bellach yn cefnogi 'dim cytundeb' a llawer, a mwyafrif mae'n debyg, yn dymuno aros, a bod rhai pobl wedi newid eu barn. Yn fy mhrofiad i, mae'r rhan fwyaf o bobl wedi newid eu barn i'r gwrthwyneb, gan eu bod yn parchu democratiaeth, yn wahanol i'r hyn a ymddengys i mi, Llywodraeth Cymru. Y ffaith yw bod pobl Cymru wedi pleidleisio o blaid gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, mewn refferendwm. Cafwyd dadl. Roeddwn yn pryderu weithiau am ansawdd y ddadl honno ar y ddwy ochr iddi, ond, ar ddiwedd y ddadl honno - ar ddiwedd y ddadl honno - pleidleisiodd pobl Cymru o blaid gadael. A does dim un refferendwm wedi bod, erioed, yn hanes ein cenedl, lle nad yw canlyniad y refferendwm hwnnw wedi ei weithredu. Ac rwy'n credu mai ein dyletswydd ni fel gwleidyddion yw gwrando ar y cyhoedd pan fyddwn yn rhoi cyfle iddyn nhw ddweud eu dweud, ac i roi canlyniad y pleidleisiau hynny ar waith. Nawr, roeddech chi'n cyfeirio hefyd yn eich datganiad at y ffaith bod Cydffederasiwn Diwydiant Prydain wedi mynegi pryder y gallem ni fod yn gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd heb gytundeb. Ymddengys eich bod yn gwrando ar Gydffederasiwn Diwydiant Prydain pan fydd hynny'n gyfleus i chi, ac yn eu hanwybyddu pan nad yw hynny'n gyfleus i chi, fel y gwelsom ni gyda ffordd liniaru'r M4 heddiw, ac, yn wir, o ran eu barn ar y cytundeb ymadael, oherwydd, wrth gwrs, roedden nhw'n cefnogi'r cytundeb ymadael y pleidleisiodd pob un ohonoch chi yn ei erbyn. Felly, ni allwch ei chael chi bob ffordd, drwy ddyfynnu unigolion mewn modd dethol pan fu eu barn yn eithaf clir ynghylch cytundeb ymadael y Prif Weinidog, gan fod ganddyn nhw farn glir iawn, a hynny oedd cefnogi'r cytundeb hwnnw er mwyn osgoi Brexit afreolus. Nawr, gadewch imi ei gwneud hi'n gwbl glir ein bod ni, ein meinciau ni, eisiau cytundeb. Rydym ni eisiau cytundeb da. Ond, os nad oes modd sicrhau hynny, yna rydym ni'n barod i gefnogi sefyllfa o 'ddim cytundeb', oherwydd mae'n rhaid i ni fod yn barod i gerdded ymaith - [ Torri ar draws.] Mae'n rhaid i chi fod yn barod i gerdded ymaith os nad yw'r cytundeb yn ddigon da. Nawr, mae'n gwbl glir - [ Torri ar draws.] Mae'n gwbl glir na all y cytundeb presennol, sef y cytundeb ymadael ar hyn o bryd, ennill mwyafrif yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin. Mae wedi cael ei roi gerbron Tŷ'r Cyffredin ar sawl achlysur. Felly, ni all gael mwyafrif yn ei ffurf bresennol, a phwy a ŵyr beth fyddai'r sefyllfa ar ôl cael Prif Weinidog newydd. Ond mae un peth yn sicr, a hynny yw bod yn rhaid i ni barchu'r canlyniad o ran y refferendwm. Nawr, roeddwn yn falch o un rhan o'ch datganiad, a hynny oedd y diwedd - nid yn unig wrth ichi derfynu'r hyn yr oeddech yn ei ddweud, ond o ran y ffaith eich bod yn cyfeirio at rai o'r pethau cyfrifol yr ydych chi'n eu gwneud fel Llywodraeth er mwyn paratoi ar gyfer y posibilrwydd o Brexit heb gytundeb. Nawr, fel y dywedais, nid wyf eisiau gweld Brexit heb gytundeb, byddai'n well o lawer gennyf pe bai gennym ni gytundeb masnach da gyda'r Undeb Ewropeaidd, ond ymddengys i mi fod llawer o anhyblygrwydd ar ochr Ewropeaidd y ddadl, lle nad yw pobl yn awyddus i roi cytundeb da inni, ac efallai'n wir y bydd hynny'n arwain at ein hymadawiad â'r UE heb un. Felly, mae'n bwysig iawn sicrhau bod gennym ni rai paratoadau priodol ar waith yn amlwg. Ac rwy'n falch o weld eich bod yn llawer mwy o ddifrif ynghylch y risg yna ac y buoch chi ers dechrau'r flwyddyn hon yn paratoi ar gyfer 'dim cytundeb'. Nawr, a gaf i ofyn - ? Rydych chi wedi neilltuo arian yn y gorffennol i baratoi ar gyfer Brexit heb gytundeb, gan gynnwys prosiectau a gweithgareddau amrywiol sy'n ymwneud â'r Llywodraeth. A gaf i ofyn ichi a ydych yn mynd i gynyddu'r swm hwnnw, o gofio'r dyddiad 31 Hydref sy'n prysur agosáu, ac, os felly, pa weithgaredd ydych chi'n disgwyl ei ariannu ohono? Oherwydd rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n bwysig ein bod yn deall yn fwy manwl pa weithgaredd rydych chi eisiau ei hybu. A allwch chi ddweud wrthym ni hefyd: o ran y prosiectau sydd eisoes wedi'u hariannu o ganlyniad i gyllid pontio'r UE, o ran y bobl sydd mewn gwirionedd yn manteisio ar yr arian hwnnw, a oes gennych chi ddosbarthiad daearyddol yng Nghymru lle y gallwch chi fapio'n union y diddordeb a'r ymgysylltu? Oherwydd rwy'n credu mai'r hyn sy'n fy mhoeni i yw, os oes Brexit heb gytundeb - ac, fel y dywedaf, rwyf eisiau osgoi hynny, ond, os oes, mae angen inni sicrhau bod pob rhan o Gymru a phob diwydiant yng Nghymru yn barod am y posibilrwydd a'r tebygolrwydd hwnnw. Felly, byddwn yn gwerthfawrogi cael yr wybodaeth ddiweddaraf am hynny'n benodol. Croesawaf yr hyn a wnaethoch chi ei ddweud, fel y dywedais, am yr amrywiaeth o weithgareddau sy'n digwydd a'r paratoadau difrifol sy'n cael eu gwneud ar hyn o bryd, ond mae'n ofid imi eich bod mewn plaid yn awr sydd yn cefnogi ail refferendwm, sy'n sôn am ymgyrchu dros aros yn y refferendwm hwnnw, ac anwybyddu, i bob pwrpas, canlyniad y bleidlais gyntaf. Rwy'n dweud wrthych chi eich bod yn blaid sydd yn gyson yn y gorffennol wedi gweithredu canlyniad refferenda pa un a ydych chi wedi hoffi'r canlyniad ai peidio, ac rydych wedi bod ar wahanol ochrau i refferenda: wedi ennill rhai, ac wedi colli rhai, yn hanesyddol. Beth sydd mor wahanol am hwn? Nid wyf yn deall.