English: I welcome, of course, this statement today. I want to focus particularly on three areas that I think are critical to any justice system. The first is ensuring the separation of the justice system from any political interference or influence. And, of course, that's playing out in Westminster, as we speak. That is hugely important if people are going to have faith in the system: first in setting that system up and, secondly, in accessing the system if they need to. Secondly, ensuring equal access to justice, and I'm talking about two types of access here: (1) in terms of affordability - . We know what happened to legal aid and we know what happened, therefore, to people's right, and I do believe that it's a human right, to access justice, being denied simply because they didn't have the finance to do that. And in the same vein, equal access has to be in terms of the physical access, the ability to access justice close to home, should you need it. And again, under human rights, people have enshrined in human rights the right to access justice. And we know - you mentioned it - the number of courts that have been closed. I don't imagine that they're going to be reopened, so we have to look at other means for people to access justice, and there are technical possibilities there that need to be invested in. And finally from me, we have to follow a Welsh-specific path. We have to focus on why people find themselves in the criminal justice system - and you've talked about social justice - in the first place, and put in some prevention very, very early on. And Jenny quite rightly mentioned children; I would have mentioned children in terms of adverse childhood experiences, which play a critical part, and they are there in large numbers within the criminal justice system. So, prevention is also a huge part of this. So, stop people becoming victims in the first place, and perpetrators in the second. So, I welcome this. There's a lot to be done. I was going to ask the question that Huw did - whether we have the ability to deliver this in terms of all that we're going to need going forward - so, I won't repeat that one. But, you know, we did look at what happens if you don't take the criminal justice system and if you start removing some of it out from fairness - and we only have to look at the probation service and the privatisation of that to see what a disaster that was. So, that's why I started where I did, and that's why I'm finishing where I'm finishing. Thank you.
Welsh: Rydw i'n croesawu'r datganiad hwn heddiw, wrth gwrs. Rydw i eisiau canolbwyntio'n benodol ar dri maes sydd, yn fy marn i, yn hanfodol i unrhyw system gyfiawnder. Y cyntaf yw sicrhau bod y system gyfiawnder yn cael ei gwahanu oddi wrth unrhyw ymyrraeth neu ddylanwad gwleidyddol. Ac, wrth gwrs, mae hynny'n digwydd yn San Steffan, fel rydym ni'n siarad. Mae hynny'n eithriadol o bwysig os yw pobl yn mynd i fod â ffydd yn y system: yn gyntaf wrth sefydlu'r system honno ac, yn ail, wrth gael mynediad i'r system os oes angen. Yn ail, sicrhau mynediad cyfartal i gyfiawnder, ac rydw i'n sôn am ddau fath o fynediad yma: (1) o ran fforddiadwyedd - . Rydym ni'n gwybod beth wnaeth ddigwydd i gymorth cyfreithiol ac rydym ni'n gwybod beth wnaeth ddigwydd, felly, i hawl pobl, ac rwy'n credu ei bod yn hawl ddynol, i gael mynediad at gyfiawnder, yn cael ei wrthod dim ond am nad oedd ganddyn nhw'r cyllid i wneud hynny. Ac yn yr un modd, rhaid i fynediad cyfartal fod o ran mynediad corfforol, y gallu i gael mynediad at gyfiawnder yn agos i'r cartref, pe bai ei angen arnoch chi. Ac eto, o dan hawliau dynol, mae pobl wedi ymgorffori mewn hawliau dynol yr hawl i gael mynediad at gyfiawnder. A gwyddom - sonioch chi amdano - nifer y llysoedd sydd wedi'u cau. Dydw i ddim yn dychmygu y byddan nhw'n cael eu hailagor, felly mae'n rhaid i ni edrych ar ffyrdd eraill i bobl gael mynediad at gyfiawnder, ac mae posibiliadau technegol yno mae angen buddsoddi ynddyn nhw. Ac yn olaf gen i, rhaid i ni ddilyn llwybr sy'n benodol i'r Gymru. Rhaid i ni ganolbwyntio ar pam mae pobl yn cael eu hunain yn y system cyfiawnder troseddol - ac rydych chi wedi sôn am gyfiawnder cymdeithasol - yn y lle cyntaf, ac wedi rhoi rhywfaint o waith atal yn gynnar iawn. A soniodd Jenny yn gwbl briodol am blant; byddwn i wedi sôn am blant o ran profiadau niweidiol yn ystod plentyndod, sy'n chwarae rhan hollbwysig, ac maen nhw yno mewn niferoedd mawr o fewn y system cyfiawnder troseddol. Felly, mae atal hefyd yn rhan enfawr o hyn. Felly, atal pobl rhag dod yn ddioddefwyr yn y lle cyntaf, a rhag cyflawni troseddau yn ail. Felly, rwy'n croesawu hyn. Mae llawer i'w wneud. Roeddwn i'n mynd i ofyn y cwestiwn y gwnaeth Huw ei ofyn - a oes gennym ni'r gallu i gyflawni hyn o ran popeth fyddwn ni ei angen wrth symud ymlaen - felly, ni wnaf ail-adrodd hynny. Ond, wyddoch chi, fe wnaethom ni edrych ar yr hyn sy'n digwydd os nad ydych chi'n cymryd y system cyfiawnder troseddol ac os byddwch chi'n dechrau tynnu rhywfaint ohono allan o degwch - a dim ond edrych ar y gwasanaeth prawf a phreifateiddio hynny sydd rhaid i ni ei wneud i weld beth oedd trychineb. Felly, dyna pam y gwnes i ddechrau ble wnes i, a dyna pam rwy'n gorffen lle rwy'n gorffen. Diolch.