English: The inter-ministerial machinery we've agreed is what should take place, and it's consistently not taking place on significant issues. We have the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill introduced without there being any engagement with us. We should have early engagement on Bills that affect devolved competence; it simply isn't happening. The most egregious breach is the one announcing in the explanatory memorandum the intention to repeal Welsh legislation that has gone through this Parliament through all forms of scrutiny, through all of the stages of scrutiny and not being challenged in the Supreme Court. My concern is that we will end up having institutional conflict rather than looking to what we want to do, which is to find a way forward to make sure there's certainty for the jobs and businesses that rely on predictable trading arrangements, as opposed to a constant attempt to rejig headlines to avoid those much larger questions. It's about the inability of the Government to function at a UK level that leads us to where we are today, and having yet another statement about border controls, because I gave a commitment to update. We're having to give up some risk to implement measures to make sure Holyhead can trade in the future with permanent arrangements to avoid there being extra cost to the public purse, but we're still not getting ministerial engagement about relatively straightforward points where it's in our interest to be constructive and engaged. It's so much better to have a plan, even if you disagree with it, than no plan at all. It's so much better to have engagement at an early level to resolve issues, even if you disagree with the approach that is being taken. The issue we have is a lack of competence and consistency and an inability to have a plan at all from the current Government in the United Kingdom level. I'd much rather be more constructive, in the tone that was struck with Sam Kurtz in his opening, but that approach simply isn't available to us with this current iteration of the UK Government.
Welsh: Y peirianwaith rhyng-weinidogol yr ydym ni wedi cytuno arno yw'r hyn y dylid ei wneud, ac yn gyson nid yw'n digwydd ar faterion o bwys. Mae Bil Protocol Gogledd Iwerddon wedi'i gyflwyno heb unrhyw ymgysylltu â ni. Dylem ymgysylltu'n gynnar ar Filiau sy'n effeithio ar gymhwysedd datganoledig; yn syml, nid yw'n digwydd. Y toriad mwyaf dybryd yw'r un sy'n cyhoeddi yn y memorandwm esboniadol y bwriad i ddiddymu deddfwriaeth Gymreig sydd wedi mynd drwy'r Senedd hon drwy bob math o graffu, drwy bob cam craffu a pheidio â chael ei herio yn y Goruchaf Lys. Fy mhryder i yw y byddwn ni yn y pen draw yn cael gwrthdaro sefydliadol yn hytrach nag edrych ar yr hyn yr ydym ni am ei wneud, sef dod o hyd i ffordd ymlaen i sicrhau bod sicrwydd i'r swyddi a'r busnesau sy'n dibynnu ar drefniadau masnachu rhagweladwy, yn hytrach nag ymgais gyson i ail-lunio penawdau er mwyn osgoi'r cwestiynau llawer mwy hynny. Mae'n ymwneud ag anallu'r Llywodraeth i weithredu ar lefel y DU sy'n ein harwain at y sefyllfa yr ydym ni ynddi heddiw, a chael datganiad arall eto am reolaethau ar y ffin, oherwydd fe wnes i ymrwymo i roi'r wybodaeth ddiweddaraf. Rydym ni'n gorfod ildio rhywfaint o risg i weithredu mesurau i sicrhau y gall Caergybi fasnachu yn y dyfodol gyda threfniadau parhaol i osgoi costau ychwanegol i'r pwrs cyhoeddus, ond nid ydym ni'n cael ymgysylltiad gweinidogol ynghylch pwyntiau cymharol syml lle mae o fudd i ni fod yn adeiladol ac ymgysylltu. Mae'n llawer gwell bod â chynllun, hyd yn oed os ydych chi'n anghytuno ag ef, na dim cynllun o gwbl. Mae'n llawer gwell ymgysylltu ar lefel gynnar i ddatrys problemau, hyd yn oed os ydych chi'n anghytuno â'r dull sy'n cael ei ddefnyddio. Y mater sydd gennym ni yw diffyg cymhwysedd a chysondeb ac anallu i gael cynllun o gwbl gan y Llywodraeth bresennol ar lefel y Deyrnas Unedig. Byddai'n llawer gwell gennyf i fod yn fwy adeiladol, yn y naws gan Sam Kurtz yn ei agoriad, ond nid yw'r dull hwnnw ar gael i ni gyda'r fersiwn gyfredol hon o Lywodraeth y DU.