English: I have three amendments in this group - amendments 56, 57 and 58. I'm grateful to Darren Millar for his formal support to those amendments. As the Bill stands, of course, the governing body or local authority decides whether additional learning provision should be made to a child or young person through the medium of Welsh or not, and then notes that in the IDP. Now, it's not a matter for authorities to decide upon, in my view. This should be a matter of the language of choice for the individual. Therefore, the process should start with the child or young person deciding whether provision should be offered to them through the medium of Welsh. Many Members, I'm sure, will have received correspondence supporting these amendments from a number of organisations, including UCAC, RhAG, Mudiad Meithrin, Cymdeithas yr Iaith, CYDAG and Mudiadau Dathlu'r Gymraeg. Now, the former Minister, at Stage 2, accepted that this needed to be reviewed, and I'm pleased that we had an opportunity to do that, and I would encourage Members to support these amendments. To come to the issue of transport, I formally support amendment 54. The Stage 1 committee report on this Bill called on the Government to consider how transport arrangements could be taken into account for those with additional learning needs, and how that could be included in the IDP. An amendment similar to this fell at Stage 2, but although the Cabinet Secretary has explained her rationale and her intention in her recent letter to the committee last week, I believe that this needs to be on the face of the Bill in order to ensure action in this area and, as we heard earlier, that it shouldn't be some sort of afterthought, but that it is given attention and consideration, which this important issue, which has such an impact on the access of children with additional learning needs to education, deserves.
Welsh: Mae gen i dri gwelliant yn y grŵp yma, sef gwelliannau 56, 57 a 58, ac rydw i'n diolch i Darren Millar am ei gefnogaeth ffurfiol ef i'r rheini. Fel y mae'r Bil yn sefyll, wrth gwrs, y corff llywodraethu neu'r awdurdod lleol sy'n penderfynu a ddylai darpariaeth dysgu ychwanegol gael ei darparu i blentyn neu berson ifanc yn Gymraeg ai peidio, ac wedyn yn nodi hynny yn y cynllun datblygu unigol. Nawr, nid mater i'r awdurdodau i benderfynu arno fe ddylai hyn fod, yn fy marn i; mater o ddewis iaith yr unigolyn yw hwn. Felly, mi ddylai'r broses gychwyn gyda'r plentyn neu'r person ifanc yn penderfynu a ddylai darpariaeth gael ei gynnig iddyn nhw trwy gyfrwng y Gymraeg. Bydd nifer o Aelodau, rydw i'n siŵr, wedi derbyn gohebiaeth yn cefnogi'r gwelliannau yma gan nifer o fudiadau, yn cynnwys Undeb Cenedlaethol Athrawon Cymru, Rhieni dros Addysg Gymraeg, Mudiad Meithrin, Cymdeithas yr Iaith, Cymdeithas Ysgolion Dros Addysg Gymraeg a Mudiadau Dathlu'r Gymraeg. Nawr, mi dderbyniodd y cyn-Weinidog, yng Nghyfnod 2, yr angen i edrych eto ar hyn, ac rwy'n falch ein bod ni wedi gallu gwneud hynny, ac mi fuaswn i'n annog Aelodau i gefnogi'r gwelliannau yma. I ddod at y mater o drafnidiaeth, rydw i'n cefnogi'n ffurfiol welliant 54. Fe wnaeth adroddiad y pwyllgor, yng Nghyfnod 1 y Bil yma, alw ar i'r Llywodraeth ystyried sut y gellir cynnwys trefniadau ar gyfer darpariaeth cludiant i'r rhai sydd ag anghenion dysgu ychwanegol yn y cynlluniau datblygu unigol. Fe syrthiodd gwelliant fel hwn yng Nghyfnod 2, ond er bod Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet wedi esbonio'i rhesymeg a'i bwriad yn ei llythyr diweddar i'r pwyllgor yr wythnos diwethaf, rydw i o'r farn bod angen rhoi hyn ar wyneb y Bil er mwyn sicrhau gweithredu ar hyn ac, fel y clywsom ni'n gynharach, nad yw'n rhyw fath o afterthought, ond ei fod yn cael y sylw a'r ystyriaeth y mae'r pwnc pwysig yma, sy'n cael cymaint o effaith ar fynediad plant ag anghenion dysgu ychwanegol i addysg, yn ei haeddu.