techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: There is a difference - and it depends entirely upon who one believes, of course. But what these two things do - [ Interruption.]
Welsh: Mae gwahaniaeth - ac mae'n dibynnu'n llwyr ar bwy mae rhywun yn ei gredu, wrth gwrs. Ond yr hyn mae'r ddau beth hyn yn ei wneud - [ Torri ar draws.]
English: Allow Helen Mary to respond.
Welsh: Gadewch i Helen Mary ymateb.
English: I have allowed Darren Millar to make an intervention; I would like him, if he will, to listen to my reply. And my reply is this: the things that the Bill we debated earlier - the Westminster Bill - and this have in common is that, read the wrong way, they both amount to a Westminster power grab. If we pass this amendment, non-devolved bodies, which Janet Finch-Saunders has rightly highlighted, would be able, if they refused to co-operate, to prevent the commencement of a piece of legislation here. I have no reason - no reason at all - to think that either the police or the Crown Prosecution Service in Wales would want to do such a thing, but this amendment makes specific reference to the UK Government needing to do something before legislation that we've passed in this place can be put into place. That's not acceptable. The thing that the two things have in common is an attempt to reduce the power and authority of this place and I for one am not prepared to tolerate either of them.
Welsh: Rwyf i wedi caniatáu i Darren Millar wneud ymyriad; hoffwn i iddo ef, os gwnaiff ef, wrando ar fy ateb. A fy ateb i yw hyn: y pethau sydd gan y Bil yr oeddem ni wedi'i drafod yn gynharach - Bil San Steffan - a hwn yn gyffredin yw, o'u darllen y ffordd anghywir, bod y ddau yn gyfystyr â San Steffan yn cipio pŵer Os byddwn ni'n pasio'r gwelliant hwn, byddai cyrff nad ydyn nhw wedi'u datganoli, y mae Janet Finch-Saunders, yn gwbl briodol, wedi tynnu sylw atyn nhw, yn gallu atal darn o ddeddfwriaeth rhag cychwyn yma, petaent yn gwrthod cydweithredu. Nid oes gennyf i unrhyw reswm - dim rheswm o gwbl - i feddwl y byddai'r heddlu na Gwasanaeth Erlyn y Goron yng Nghymru eisiau gwneud y fath beth, ond mae'r gwelliant hwn yn cyfeirio'n benodol at y ffaith bod angen i Lywodraeth y DU wneud rhywbeth cyn bod modd rhoi deddfwriaeth yr ydym ni wedi'i phasio yn y lle hwn ar waith. Nid yw hynny'n dderbyniol. Yr hyn sydd gan y ddau beth yn gyffredin yw ymgais i leihau grym ac awdurdod y lle hwn ac nid wyf i yn barod i oddef y naill na'r llall ohonyn nhw.
English: Whilst my group would rather this Bill was rejected in its entirety, we will be supporting this amendment by Janet Finch-Saunders. The fact of the matter is: this is a bad piece of legislation. It removes the defence of reasonable punishment. Reasonable. What any of us in this Chamber would have thought was reasonable punishment is now not a defence. So, what it does is take it down to the minutiae of smacking a child, tapping a child on the hand. This is where this is a bad piece of legislation by any standards whatsoever. We have the protection of the law and I am absolutely certain that everybody in this Chamber does care about the protection of children, but there is huge verbal abuse of our children. This doesn't in any way affect the verbal abuse of children, which is far more psychologically damaging than a small tap on the hand.
Welsh: Er y byddai'n well gan fy ngrŵp i petai'r Bil hwn yn cael ei wrthod yn ei gyfanrwydd, byddwn ni'n cefnogi'r gwelliant hwn gan Janet Finch-Saunders. Y gwir amdani yw bod hwn yn ddarn gwael o ddeddfwriaeth. Mae'n dileu'r amddiffyniad o gosb resymol. Rhesymol. Nid yw'r hyn y byddai unrhyw un ohonom ni y Siambr hon wedi'i ystyried yn gosb resymol yn amddiffyniad mwyach. Felly, yr hyn y mae'n ei wneud yw ystyried manylion smacio plentyn, taro plentyn ar ei law. Dyma le mae hwn yn ddarn gwael o ddeddfwriaeth yn ôl unrhyw safonau o gwbl. Mae gennym ni amddiffyniad y gyfraith ac rwyf i'n gwbl sicr bod pawb yn y Siambr hon yn poeni ynghylch diogelu plant, ond mae ein plant yn dioddef llawer iawn o gam-drin geiriol. Nid yw hyn yn effeithio mewn unrhyw ffordd ar gam-drin plant yn eiriol, sy'n llawer mwy niweidiol yn seicolegol na chael eu taro'n ysgafn ar y llaw.
English: David, would you give way?
Welsh: David, a wnewch chi'n ildio?
English: Would you agree also that parental alienation is a massive form of child abuse, which is completely ignored by many Assembly Members here? Many Members ignore it. It's the only kind of child abuse that is accepted. We should have a Bill on that.
Welsh: A fyddech chi hefyd yn cytuno bod dieithrio rhieni'n yn fath enfawr o gam-drin plant, sy'n cael ei anwybyddu'n llwyr gan lawer o Aelodau'r Cynulliad hwn? Mae llawer o Aelodau'n ei anwybyddu. Dyma'r unig fath o gam-drin plant sy'n cael ei dderbyn. Dylem ni fod â Bil ar hynny.
English: Let me just explore a scenario where a couple are in a restaurant or a cafe with a young child. They have hot cups of coffee or a container of hot coffee on the table and the child goes to grab the coffee, and the mother instinctively taps the child's hand to warn it against that. [ Interruption.] And then, you have zealots in that cafe, which could be Plaid Cymru AMs or Labour AMs, who choose to inform the police of what's happened. You could have the scenario where a parent is dragged out of the cafe -
Welsh: Gadewch i mi ystyried sefyllfa lle mae cwpl gyda phlentyn ifanc mewn bwyty neu gaffi. Mae ganddyn nhw gwpanau poeth o goffi neu gynhwysydd o goffi poeth ar y bwrdd ac mae'r plentyn yn mynd i fachu'r coffi, ac mae'r fam, yn reddfol, yn tapio llaw'r plentyn i'w rybuddio yn erbyn hynny. [ Torri ar draws.] Ac yna, mae gennych chi selotiaid yn y caffi hwn, a allai fod yn ACau Plaid Cymru neu ACau Llafur, sy'n dewis rhoi gwybod i'r heddlu am yr hyn sydd wedi digwydd. Gallech chi gael y senario lle mae rhiant yn cael ei lusgo allan o'r caffi -
English: Can we allow the Member to carry on in a degree of silence, please?
Welsh: A allwn ni ganiatáu i'r Aelod gario ymlaen mewn rhywfaint o dawelwch, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: - by the police. That's the sort of law you're seeking to bring in to this Chamber. I support Janet's amendment, which has overwhelming support from all those who've contacted me about this Bill. I've had probably more contact over this particular Bill than on anything else that's been brought through this Chamber. And from academics, and from people who actually work in this area. And all of them condemning this Bill. It's a bad piece of legislation.
Welsh: - gan yr heddlu. Dyna'r math o gyfraith rydych chi'n ceisio ei chyflwyno i'r Siambr hon. Rwy'n cefnogi gwelliant Janet, y mae pawb sydd wedi cysylltu â mi ynglŷn â'r Bil hwn yn ei gefnogi'n ysgubol. Mae'n debyg fy mod i wedi cael mwy o ohebiaeth ynghylch y Bil arbennig hwn nag ynghylch unrhyw beth arall sydd wedi cael ei ddwyn drwy'r Siambr hon. A gan academyddion, a gan bobl sy'n gweithio yn y maes hwn. A phob un ohonyn nhw'n condemnio'r Bil hwn. Mae'n ddarn gwael o ddeddfwriaeth.
English: I will. Yes, of course, I will.
Welsh: Gwnaf. Ie, wrth gwrs fe wnaf.
English: You said that you had had lots of communication from professionals working in this field. Are you aware that every single professional who gave evidence to the Children, Young People and Education Committee from health, education, across the board, were in support of this legislation?
Welsh: Fe wnaethoch chi ddweud eich bod wedi cael llawer o ohebiaeth gan weithwyr proffesiynol sy'n gweithio yn y maes hwn. A ydych chi'n ymwybodol bod pob un gweithiwr proffesiynol a roddodd dystiolaeth i'r Pwyllgor Plant, Pobl Ifanc ac Addysg o feysydd iechyd, addysg, yn gyffredinol, yn cefnogi'r ddeddfwriaeth hon?
English: All I can say is what's coming through my e-mails and through my letterbox, which is absolutely contrary to what you've just said.
Welsh: Y cyfan y gallaf i ei ddweud yw'r hyn sy'n dod drwy fy negeseuon e-bost a drwy fy mlwch llythyrau, sy'n gwbl groes i'r hyn yr ydych chi newydd ei ddweud.
English: A point has been made about the support or otherwise for this particular piece of legislation. Do you accept that there's very little parental support because poll after poll has demonstrated that parents do not want this legislation passed, and indeed members of the public, when polled, have consistently polled at least two thirds to three quarters in favour of maintaining the current arrangements?
Welsh: Mae pwynt wedi'i wneud ynglŷn â'r gefnogaeth neu fel arall ar gyfer y darn penodol hwn o ddeddfwriaeth. A ydych chi'n derbyn mai ychydig iawn o rieni sy'n ei gefnogi gan fod pleidlais ar ôl pleidlais wedi dangos nad yw rhieni eisiau i'r ddeddfwriaeth hon gael ei phasio, ac yn wir wrth ofyn i aelodau o'r cyhoedd bleidleisio ar hyn, mae dwy ran o dair neu dri chwarter ohonyn nhw yn gyson wedi pleidleisio o blaid cadw'r trefniadau presennol?
English: Absolutely. We've heard in this Chamber the transposition of what's happened in Ireland. One prosecution. That's all it's resulted in. And how many investigations? How much time and effort by the social services have been involved in the many cases that must have been coming forward to them - the cost of all that when they should be investigating much more serious areas of abuse of children? We know that in this country, whether we like it or not, there is a risk-averse culture within our social services. That's why we see children taken into care where they should never have been taken into care, because of the over zealousness, often, of social services, and that's exactly what we will get with this Bill at a huge cost to this country.
Welsh: Yn hollol. Rydym ni wedi clywed yn y Siambr hon am y broses o drosi'r hyn sydd wedi digwydd yn Iwerddon. Un erlyniad. Dyna'r cyfan a ddeilliodd ohoni. A sawl ymchwiliad? Faint o amser ac ymdrech a fu gan y gwasanaethau cymdeithasol yn ymwneud â'r nifer fawr o achosion a fu, heb os, yn dod ger eu bron - cost hynny oll pan ddylen nhw fod yn ymchwilio i feysydd llawer mwy difrifol o gam-drin plant? Gwyddom ni yn y wlad hon, pa un ag ydym ni'n hoffi hynny ai peidio, fod diwylliant gwrth-risg yn ein gwasanaethau cymdeithasol. Dyna pam yr ydym ni'n gweld plant yn derbyn gofal pan na ddylen nhw fod wedi bod yn derbyn gofal, oherwydd gorfrwdfrydedd y gwasanaethau cymdeithasol, yn aml, a dyna'n union y byddwn ni'n ei gael gyda'r Bil hwn am gost enfawr i'r wlad hon.
English: One minute, Helen Mary. - an assessment of the cost to social services of this Bill in terms of an uplift in referrals and an increased burden on social workers.
Welsh: Un funud, Helen Mary. - asesiad o gost y Bil hwn i'r gwasanaethau cymdeithasol o ran cynnydd yn nifer yr atgyfeiriadau a baich cynyddol ar weithwyr cymdeithasol.
English: I'm not sure if the Member is aware that, in terms of response rates to that survey, it was fewer than 13 per cent of local authority members who were surveyed who responded at all. One would expect, under those circumstances, that they would be members who were opposed. I think we just have to be a bit careful about how we use those figures, and I've already made the point about the New Zealand survey, which was just that - it was an opinion poll commissioned by the organisation that had opposed the ban in the first place.
Welsh: Nid wyf yn siŵr a yw'r Aelod yn ymwybodol, o ran cyfraddau ymateb i'r arolwg hwnnw, mai dim ond llai na 13 y cant o'r aelodau awdurdodau lleol a arolygwyd a ymatebodd o gwbl. Byddai rhywun yn disgwyl, o dan yr amgylchiadau hynny, y bydden nhw'n aelodau a oedd yn gwrthwynebu. Rwy'n credu bod yn rhaid i ni fod yn eithaf gofalus ynglŷn â sut yr ydym ni'n defnyddio'r ffigurau hynny, ac rwyf eisoes wedi gwneud y pwynt ynghylch arolwg Seland Newydd, sef yr union beth hwnnw - roedd yn bôl piniwn a gomisiynwyd gan y sefydliad a oedd wedi gwrthwynebu'r gwaharddiad yn y lle cyntaf.
English: I call on the Deputy Minister to reply.
Welsh: Y Dirprwy Weinidog i ymateb.
English: Diolch. I listened carefully to what stakeholders and the three committees said during Stage 1 about the importance of ensuring sufficient time is available prior to the change in the law to abolish the defence of reasonable punishment. As a result, I brought forth amendments at Stage 2 to provide certainty around the date for the change in the law and for a period of two years between Royal Assent and commencement. I believe that this remains the most appropriate way to bring in this change. This certainty, in terms of the timeline, will allow all our key partners, including the police, social services and the Crown Prosecution Service to plan for changes to guidance, training and data collection and to be able to do it more effectively because they know the exact period of time that they've got. It will also provide a focus for our awareness-raising campaign.
Welsh: Diolch. Gwrandewais yn astud ar yr hyn a ddywedodd y rhanddeiliaid a'r tri phwyllgor yn ystod Cyfnod 1 am bwysigrwydd sicrhau bod digon o amser ar gael i ddiddymu'r amddiffyniad cosb resymol cyn y newid yn y gyfraith. O ganlyniad, fe wnes i gyflwyno gwelliannau yng Nghyfnod 2 i ddarparu sicrwydd ynghylch y dyddiad ar gyfer y newid yn y gyfraith ac am gyfnod o ddwy flynedd rhwng y Cydsyniad Brenhinol a dechrau gweithredu'r ddeddf. Credaf mai dyma'r ffordd fwyaf priodol o hyd i gyflwyno'r newid hwn. Bydd y sicrwydd hwn, o ran yr amserlen, yn caniatáu i'n holl bartneriaid allweddol, gan gynnwys yr heddlu, y gwasanaethau cymdeithasol a Gwasanaeth Erlyn y Goron, gynllunio ar gyfer newidiadau i ganllawiau, hyfforddiant a chasglu data a gallu ei wneud mewn modd mwy effeithiol oherwydd eu bod yn gwybod yr union gyfnod o amser sydd ganddynt. Bydd hefyd yn darparu pwyslais i'n hymgyrch codi ymwybyddiaeth.
English: Allow the Deputy Minister to carry on, please, and be heard.
Welsh: Gadewch i'r Dirprwy Weinidog barhau a chael gwrandawiad, os gwelwch yn dda.
English: If I can continue, Members have referred to public opinion, and I think it's very important to say that 58 per cent already think it's not lawful to hit a child. So, a majority actually think that this law is in place already and, on the whole, public opinion is changing. More and more people in Wales are thinking that physical punishment is not acceptable and we are tracking that, and we will continue to track it after this legislation is passed. And what is particularly significant, I think, is that it is the parents who are actually bringing up children - parents with young children - who are more and more in a majority believing that it's not physically acceptable to harm their child. And so, I really feel that this legislation is in the mood of the times. It is going with public opinion. And I know that in the past there were different standards and people operated in a different way, but now we've moved on and we have much more information; we've got much more research that shows us the potential harm. And so, I feel that we are doing exactly the right thing in bringing forward this legislation today, and I therefore urge you not to support amendment 10, which would cause great difficulties for bringing this legislation into force.
Welsh: Os caf i barhau, mae Aelodau wedi cyfeirio at farn y cyhoedd, ac rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n bwysig iawn i ddweud bod 58 y cant eisoes yn credu nad yw'n gyfreithlon i daro plentyn. Felly, mewn gwirionedd, mae mwyafrif yn credu bod y gyfraith hon ar waith eisoes ac, ar y cyfan, mae barn y cyhoedd yn newid. Mae mwy a mwy o bobl yng Nghymru yn credu nad yw cosbi corfforol yn dderbyniol ac rydym ni'n cadw golwg ar hynny, a byddwn yn parhau i gadw golwg arno ar ôl i'r ddeddfwriaeth hon gael ei phasio. A'r hyn sy'n arbennig o arwyddocaol, rwy'n credu, yw mai'r rhieni sy'n magu plant - rhieni sydd â phlant ifanc - sydd fwyfwy mewn mwyafrif yn credu nad yw'n dderbyniol niweidio eu plentyn yn gorfforol. Ac felly, rwyf wir yn teimlo bod y ddeddfwriaeth hon yn cyd-fynd ag ysbryd yr oes. Mae'n cyd-fynd â barn y cyhoedd. Ac rwy'n gwybod y bu safonau gwahanol yn y gorffennol a bod pobl yn gweithredu mewn ffordd wahanol, ond nawr rydym wedi symud ymlaen ac mae gennym ni lawer mwy o wybodaeth; mae gennym ni lawer mwy o ymchwil sy'n dangos y niwed posibl. Ac felly, rwy'n teimlo ein bod ni'n gwneud yr union beth iawn wrth gyflwyno'r ddeddfwriaeth hon heddiw, ac rwy'n eich annog felly i beidio â chefnogi gwelliant 10, a fyddai'n achosi anawsterau mawr o ran dwyn y ddeddfwriaeth hon i rym.
English: The question is that amendment 10 be agreed. Does any Member object? [ Objection.] We will therefore move to the vote, and open the vote on amendment 10. Close the vote. In favour 16, no abstentions, 37 against. Therefore, amendment 10 is not agreed.
Welsh: Y cwestiwn yw: a ddylid derbyn gwelliant 10? A oes unrhyw wrthwynebiad? [ Gwrthwynebiad. ] Rydym ni'n symud i'r bleidlais felly, ac agor y bleidlais ar welliant 10. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid 16, neb yn ymatal, 37 yn erbyn. Felly, gwrthodwyd gwelliant 10.
English: We have therefore reached the end of our Stage 3 consideration of the Children (Abolition of the Defence of Reasonable Punishment) (Wales) Bill. I declare that all sections and Schedules of the Bill are deemed agreed, and that brings our proceedings of this Stage 3 to an end.
Welsh: Rydym ni felly wedi cyrraedd diwedd ein ystyriaeth Cyfnod 3 o'r Bil Plant (Diddymu Amddifyniad Cosb Resymol) (Cymru). Dwi'n datgan bod pob adran o'r Bil a phob Atodlen wedi eu derbyn, a daw hynna â'n trafodion am y Cyfnod 3 yma i ben.
English: Thank you, and welcome to the Culture, Welsh Language and Communications Committee here this morning. The first item on the agenda is introductions, apologies, substitutions and declarations of interest. Carwyn Jones has apologised because he's ill and Delyth Jewell will be late because of train problems, which is something that's quite usual at this time, I'm afraid. Do any Members have anything to declare here today? No. Thank you very much.
Welsh: Diolch, a chroeso i'r Pwyllgor Diwylliant, y Gymraeg a Chyfathrebu yma y bore yma. Eitem 1 ar yr agenda yw cyflwyniadau, ymddiheuriadau a dirprwyon a datgan buddiannau. Mae Carwyn Jones wedi rhoi ymddiheuriadau am ei fod yn sâl ac mae Delyth Jewell yn mynd i fod yn hwyr oherwydd problemau trên sydd yn rhywbeth arferol ar hyn o bryd, mae arnaf ofn. Oes gan unrhyw Aelod rhywbeth i'w ddatgan yma heddiw? Nag oes. Diolch yn fawr iawn.
English: Moving on to item 2: a discussion on 'Small Screen: Big Debate', which is being run by Ofcom and we're going to feed into that as a committee, and also, while we have the broadcasters here, we're also going to ask questions on the inquiry into the devolution of broadcasting that starts today with you. So, no pressure with your answers in that regard. We welcome Rhodri Talfan Davies, director, BBC Cymru Wales; Phil Henfrey, head of news and programmes, ITV Cymru Wales; Magnus Brooke, director of policy and regulatory affairs, ITV; and also Owen Evans, chief executive, S4C. Most of you have been here before, except for Magnus. I'd like to welcome you here this morning. And, as usual, we have discussions on the basis of different themes. So, Assembly Members will ask questions as we go on, if that's okay with you. And, therefore, I will start with the first question - questions that we have perhaps looked at before, so if you want to vary your responses then please do so. Just in terms of viewing habits in Wales, how do you think viewing habits in Wales have changed over the years? Do you see that change in your specific organisations? Happy for anyone to start.
Welsh: Symud ymlaen at eitem 2: trafodaeth ynghylch 'Sgrin Fach: Trafodaeth Fawr' sydd yn cael ei redeg gan Ofcom ac rydym ni'n mynd i fwydo i mewn i hynny fel pwyllgor, ac hefyd, tra bod y darlledwyr yma, rydym hefyd yn mynd i ofyn cwestiynau ynglŷn â'r ymchwiliad i ddatganoli darlledu sydd yn cychwyn heddiw gyda chi. Felly, no pressure gyda'ch atebion chi yn hynny o beth. Rydym yn croesawu Rhodri Talfan Davies, cyfarwyddwr, BBC Cymru; Phil Henfrey, pennaeth newyddion a rhaglenni, ITV Cymru Wales; Magnus Brooke, cyfarwyddwr polisi a materion rheoleiddio, ITV; ac hefyd Owen Evans, prif weithredwr, S4C. Mae'r rhan fwyaf ohonoch chi wedi bod yma o'r blaen, heblaw am Magnus. Hoffwn i eich croesawu chi yma y bore yma. Ac, fel arfer, rydym yn cael trafodaethau ar sail themâu gwahanol. Felly, bydd Aelodau Cynulliad yn gofyn cwestiynau wrth i ni fynd ymlaen, os yw hynny'n iawn gyda chi. Ac felly, byddaf yn cychwyn gyda'r cwestiwn cyntaf - cwestiynau rydym wedi efallai edrych arnynt o'r blaen, felly os ydych eisiau amrywio eich atebion yna plis gwnewch. Jest o ran arferion gwylio yng Nghymru, sut ydych chi'n credu bod yr arferion gwylio wedi newid dros y blynyddoedd? Ydych chi'n gweld y newid hwnnw yn eich mudiadau penodol chi? Hapus i rywun gychwyn.
English: Just in terms of adding to this, is it different - ? You're talking about Britain, but is it different to the trends in other parts of Britain, or is it similar to the trends?
Welsh: Jest o ran ychwanegu at hyn, ydy e'n wahanol i weddill - ? Rydych chi'n sôn am Brydain, ond ydy e'n wahanol i trends gweddill Prydain, neu ydy e'n debyg i'r trends?
English: I think, generally speaking, the trends are quite consistent across the UK. I do think that there are specifics that do deserve discussion. I think that viewing habits and the use of media is changing, but also what's used is also changing, and the growth among the younger generation in terms of viewing American content is substantial. The growth of Netflix specifically has been very substantial indeed, so there are cultural risks. If you look at UK culture or Welsh culture, I think both are important issues because the growth of Netflix - . Although there's been investments in things such as The Crown, the core investment and the core growth happens over in the United States, and I do think that there's an issue there. There is an issue in terms of cultural emphasis. And along with the growth of social media platforms particularly, the prominence of UK content and Welsh content on the social media platforms is an issue that we do need to focus on, because there is no regulation by anyone in the UK over the prominence of content on those platforms, and certainly among the younger generation - those under 40, perhaps under 30 - the importance of those platforms is now a substantially important issue.
Welsh: Dwi'n meddwl, yn gyffredinol, fod y trends yn weddol gyson ledled y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Dwi'n meddwl bod yna bethau penodol sy'n werth eu trafod. Dwi'n meddwl bod arferion o ran defnydd cyfryngau'n newid, ond hefyd mae beth sy'n cael ei ddefnyddio yn newid, ac mae'r twf ymhlith y to iau o ran gwylio cynnwys Americanaidd yn sylweddol. Mae twf Netflix yn benodol wedi bod yn sylweddol iawn, ac felly mae peryglon diwylliannol. Os ydych chi'n ystyried diwylliant Prydeinig neu ddiwylliant Cymreig, mae'r ddau, dwi'n meddwl, yn faterion pwysig achos mae twf Netflix - . Er bod yna fuddsoddiadau i bethau fel The Crown, mae'r twf ac mae'r buddsoddiad creiddiol yn digwydd draw yn yr Unol Daleithiau a dwi yn meddwl bod yna issue yn fanna. Mae yna issue o ran pwyslais diwylliannol. Ac ochr yn ochr â thwf y llwyfannau cymdeithasol yn benodol, mae amlygrwydd cynnwys Prydeinig a chynnwys Cymreig ar y llwyfannau cymdeithasol yn fater y mae eisiau i ni ganolbwyntio arno, achos does yna ddim rheolaeth gan unrhyw un ym Mhrydain dros amlygrwydd y cynnwys ar y gwasanaethau hynny, ac yn sicr ymhlith y to iau - o dan 40, efallai o dan 30 - mae pwysigrwydd y llwyfannau yna bellach yn fater sylweddol.
English: Sorry, Owen.
Welsh: Sori, Owen.