English: Can I, first of all, welcome the statement? Can I highlight two things? The importance of dialogue regarding bus services - too often, bus services are being run by bus companies without enough dialogue with users and others. The second thing: the importance of bus-rail interchanges. I don't think you can overestimate the popularity of concessionary travel. Support for it is overwhelming in my constituency. Allowing elderly and disabled people to get out, meet with others, or, as happens during the summer in Swansea, get down the Mumbles, has a huge effect on people's health. In fact, this would probably be better off being counted as health expenditure because it is dealing with a horrible thing that affects very many elderly and disabled people: loneliness. And anything that attacks that really is a major health benefit. I've got two questions for you. You talk about administrating on an all-Wales basis. Why not? An awful lot of concessionary journeys actually go across boundaries: into Swansea and Cardiff in the south, and I would guess, though I don't know north Wales very well, into a number of the resorts on the north Wales coast. Also, on the 16 to 19s, I think they would benefit greatly from the mytravelpass scheme, not just for education, and in schools and colleges, but also for leisure activities and, again, to get out and meet friends. I think that loneliness is not a scourge only of the elderly. You can be lonely stuck at home as a 17-year-old in front of your computer, where your only social interaction is via pixels. What is the drawback of running the mytravelpass scheme on exactly the same mandatory basis as the concessionary scheme?
Welsh: A gaf i, yn gyntaf oll, groesawu'r datganiad? A gaf i dynnu sylw at ddau beth? Pwysigrwydd deialog ynglŷn â gwasanaethau bysiau - yn rhy aml, mae gwasanaethau bysiau'n cael eu cynnal gan gwmnïau bysiau heb ddigon o ddeialog â defnyddwyr ac eraill. Yr ail beth: pwysigrwydd cyfnewidfeydd bws-rheilffyrdd. Nid wyf yn meddwl y gallwch chi or-amcangyfrif pa mor boblogaidd yw teithio rhatach. Mae cefnogaeth enfawr iddo yn fy etholaeth i. Mae caniatáu i bobl oedrannus a phobl anabl fynd allan, cwrdd ag eraill, neu, fel sy'n digwydd yn ystod yr haf yn Abertawe, mynd i'r Mwmbwls, yn cael effaith enfawr ar iechyd pobl. A dweud y gwir, mae'n debyg y byddai'n well cyfrif hyn fel gwariant ar iechyd oherwydd mae'n rhoi sylw i beth ofnadwy sy'n effeithio ar lawer iawn o bobl hŷn ac anabl: unigrwydd. Ac mae unrhyw beth sy'n ymosod ar hynny yn fudd iechyd mawr. Mae gen i ddau gwestiwn ichi. Rydych chi'n sôn am weinyddu ar sail Cymru gyfan. Pam ddim? Mae llawer iawn o deithiau rhatach yn mynd ar draws ffiniau: i Abertawe a Chaerdydd yn y de, a byddwn yn dyfalu, er nad wyf i'n adnabod y gogledd yn dda iawn, i mewn i nifer o'r cyrchfannau ar arfordir y gogledd. Hefyd, o ran pobl ifanc 16 i 19, rwy'n meddwl y byddent yn elwa'n fawr o'r cynllun fyngherdynteithio, nid yn unig ar gyfer addysg, ac mewn ysgolion a cholegau, ond hefyd ar gyfer gweithgareddau hamdden ac, unwaith eto, i fynd allan a chwrdd â ffrindiau. Dydw i ddim yn meddwl mai dim ond yr henoed sy'n gallu dioddef o unigrwydd. Gallwch fod yn unig yn sownd gartref fel plentyn 17 mlwydd oed o flaen eich cyfrifiadur, lle mai dim ond drwy gyfrwng picselau rydych chi'n rhyngweithio'n gymdeithasol. Beth yw anfantais cynnal y cynllun fyngherdynteithio ar yr un sail orfodol yn union â'r cynllun tocynnau teithio rhatach?