techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you all for your warm and sincere contributions reflecting the tremendous affection and respect felt towards Carl Sargeant across this Chamber. There are others of you who'd have liked to speak this afternoon, but I've not been able to call all. I'll make sure that the list of speakers for this afternoon is shared with the family. Carl's achievements as both Minister and Assembly Member were many, and, as such, his legacy will continue to touch the lives of many people across the nation for years to come. We come to this Assembly from many and varied backgrounds, representing every community in Wales. Sometimes this place can change us. It didn't change Carl Sargeant. He remained true to his community and his background. The Carl I first met in 2003 was the same Carl in this Chamber only two weeks ago. He influenced us, not the other way round, and his constituents and his causes had no finer champion in this place. I now bring this session to a close. The bell will be rung five minutes before we reconvene. I ask you to leave this Chamber in silence and to do so in fond and lasting memory of our friend, our comrade, ein cyfaill, Carl Sargeant.
Welsh: Diolch i chi gyd am eich cyfraniadau gwresog a diffuant sy'n adlewyrchu'r hoffter a'r parch aruthrol a deimlir tuag at Carl Sargeant ar draws y Siambr hon. Mae eraill ohonoch a fyddai wedi hoffi siarad y prynhawn yma, ond nid wyf wedi gallu galw ar bob un. Byddaf yn sicrhau bod y rhestr o siaradwyr y prynhawn yma yn cael ei rhannu â'r teulu. Mae cyflawniadau Carl fel Gweinidog ac fel Aelod Cynulliad yn niferus, ac, fel y cyfryw, bydd ei etifeddiaeth yn parhau i ddylanwadu ar fywydau llawer o bobl ledled y wlad am flynyddoedd i ddod. Rydym yn dod i'r Cynulliad hwn o gefndiroedd niferus ac amrywiol, sy'n cynrychioli pob cymuned yng Nghymru. Gall y lle hwn ein newid ni weithiau. Ni wnaeth newid Carl Sargeant. Parhaodd yn driw i'w gymuned a'i gefndir. Yr un oedd y Carl y gwnes i gyfarfod ag ef gyntaf yn 2003 â'r Carl a oedd yn y Siambr hon bythefnos yn ôl. Fe ddylanwadodd arnom ni, nid i'r gwrthwyneb, ac nid oedd hyrwyddwr gwell nag ef i'w etholwyr a'i achosion yn y lle hwn. Rwyf nawr yn dirwyn y sesiwn hon i ben. Bydd y gloch yn canu bum munud cyn i ni ailgynnull. Gofynnaf ichi adael y Siambr hon yn dawel a gwneud hynny er cof cynnes a pharhaol am ein ffrind, ein cymrawd, ein cyfaill, Carl Sargeant.
English: I call the Assembly to order. The item on our agenda is questions to the First Minister. The first question, Janet Finch-Saunders.
Welsh: Rwy'n galw'r Cynulliad i drefn. Yr eitem ar ein hagenda yw'r cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog. Y cwestiwn cyntaf, Janet Finch-Saunders.
English: Procurement policy is focused on meeting the challenge of austerity whilst maximising opportunity for Welsh business and creating sustainable jobs as we exit the EU.
Welsh: Mae polisi caffael yn canolbwyntio ar ymateb i her cyni cyllidol gan sicrhau cymaint o gyfleoedd â phosibl i fusnesau Cymru a chreu swyddi cynaliadwy wrth i ni adael yr UE.
English: Thank you. First Minister, as you are aware, the number of people waiting more than a year for surgery in Wales has increased this year by 400 per cent. Now, in order to get those lists down, health boards are forced to procure some services and health treatments outside Wales. In my own health board, I am aware of several referrals to the Priory clinic for those wishing to access vital mental health services and treatments. To reduce the waiting lists for operations that cannot be performed in good time in Wales, our NHS is now spending £255 million procuring that treatment for people outside of Wales in one year, and the total number of patients is 46,000 patients. First Minister, we've had devolution now for 20 years and still we're having to procure much-needed health services outside of Wales. What steps will you be taking to ensure that our patients receive the treatment they require in good time and, most importantly, in their own locality and more available than it is currently?
Welsh: Diolch. Prif Weinidog, fel y gwyddoch, mae nifer y bobl sy'n aros mwy na blwyddyn am lawdriniaeth yng Nghymru wedi cynyddu 400 y cant eleni. Nawr, er mwyn lleihau'r rhestrau hynny, mae byrddau iechyd yn cael eu gorfodi i gaffael rhai gwasanaethau a thriniaethau iechyd y tu allan i Gymru. Yn fy Mwrdd Iechyd fy hun, rwy'n ymwybodol o sawl atgyfeiriad i glinig y Priory ar gyfer y rheini sydd eisiau defnyddio gwasanaethau a thriniaethau iechyd meddwl hanfodol. Er mwyn lleihau'r rhestrau aros ar gyfer llawdriniaethau na ellir eu cyflawni yn brydlon yng Nghymru, mae ein GIG bellach yn gwario £255 miliwn ar gaffael y driniaeth honno ar gyfer pobl y tu allan i Gymru mewn un flwyddyn, a 46,000 o gleifion yw cyfanswm y cleifion. Prif Weinidog, mae datganoli gennym ers 20 mlynedd erbyn hyn, ac eto rydym ni'n dal i orfod caffael gwasanaethau iechyd y mae wir eu hangen y tu allan i Gymru. Pa gamau fyddwch chi'n eu cymryd i sicrhau bod ein cleifion yn derbyn y driniaeth sydd ei hangen arnynt mewn da bryd ac, yn bwysicaf oll, yn eu hardaloedd eu hunain ac ar gael yn fwy nag y mae ar hyn o bryd?
English: I do know that her party has expressed very strong views - views that I agree with - that people should not be prevented from accessing treatment across the border. I think it's important that, where treatment is available, people should have access to it. We should not seek to create a situation where we try to make available all treatment in Wales. There will be some specialist treatment that will have to be accessed from bigger cities. Where we can provide treatment, we will. One example of that is the sub-regional neonatal intensive care centre, where the original recommendation was to move the service out of Wales. I commissioned a review and, as a result of that review, it was possible then to move ahead with the SuRNICC. So, where we can, we will. But, we shouldn't be afraid of procuring services outside of Wales if that's what patients need.
Welsh: Gwn fod ei phlaid hi wedi mynegi safbwyntiau cryf iawn - safbwyntiau yr wyf i'n cytuno â nhw - na ddylid atal pobl rhag cael triniaeth dros y ffin. Rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n bwysig, pan fo'r driniaeth ar gael, y dylai bobl allu gwneud defnydd ohoni. Ni ddylem geisio creu sefyllfa lle'r ydym ni'n ceisio sicrhau bod pob triniaeth ar gael yng Nghymru. Bydd rhywfaint o driniaeth arbenigol y bydd rhaid cael gafael arni o ddinasoedd mwy. Pan allwn ni ddarparu triniaeth, byddwn yn gwneud hynny. Un enghraifft o hynny yw'r ganolfan gofal dwys newyddenedigol isranbarthol, pan mai'r argymhelliad gwreiddiol oedd symud y gwasanaeth allan o Gymru. Comisiynais adolygiad ac, o ganlyniad i'r adolygiad hwnnw, roedd yn bosibl symud ymlaen wedyn gyda'r SuRNICC. Felly, pan allwn ni, byddwn yn ei wneud. Ond, ni ddylem ni ofni caffael gwasanaethau y tu allan i Gymru os mai dyna sydd ei angen ar gleifion.
English: First Minister, how does the Welsh Government plan to use procurement levers in the context of the Valleys taskforce delivery plan to create jobs and boost prosperity in the northern Valleys?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, sut mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn bwriadu defnyddio ysgogwyr caffael yng nghyd-destun cynllun cyflawni tasglu'r Cymoedd i greu swyddi a hybu ffyniant yn y Cymoedd gogleddol?
English: The Valleys taskforce action plan commits us to using public procurement innovatively, so that we can exploit the job creation potential from the major infrastructure investments that we have in Wales. For example, programmes like the south Wales metro, major road schemes like the M4, and the ongoing work to dual the A465 will embed a community-benefit approach to ensure that outcomes are closely monitored so that communities get the maximum benefit from the schemes that are moving forward in their areas.
Welsh: Mae cynllun gweithredu tasglu'r Cymoedd yn ein hymrwymo i ddefnyddio caffael cyhoeddus yn arloesol, fel y gallwn fanteisio ar y potensial creu swyddi o'r buddsoddiadau seilwaith mawr sydd gennym ni yng Nghymru. Er enghraifft, bydd rhaglenni fel metro de Cymru, cynlluniau ffyrdd pwysig fel yr M4, a'r gwaith sy'n parhau i ddeuoli'r A465 yn ymsefydlu dull budd cymunedol i sicrhau bod canlyniadau'n cael eu monitro'n ofalus fel bod cymunedau'n cael y budd mwyaf posibl o'r cynlluniau sy'n cael eu datblygu yn eu hardaloedd.
English: With over £1 billion less to spend on public services in Wales, clearly there is a great deal of pressure. Of course, we have called on the UK Government to end this period of austerity and that, I hope, is a message that will be heard by the Chancellor of the Exchequer at the end of this month.
Welsh: Gan fod gennym dros £1 biliwn yn llai i'w wario ar wasanaethau cyhoeddus yng Nghymru, mae'n amlwg bod llawer iawn o bwysau. Wrth gwrs, rydym ni wedi galw ar Lywodraeth y DU i roi terfyn ar y cyfnod hwn o gyni cyllidol ac mae hwnnw, rwy'n gobeithio, yn neges a fydd yn cael ei glywed gan Ganghellor y Trysorlys ddiwedd y mis hwn.
English: Diolch, First Minister. The UK Tory Government's Chancellor, Philip Hammond, will deliver his budget on 22 November in the House of Commons chamber. Recently, the Welsh and Scottish finance Ministers jointly met with Treasury officials at the finance quadrilateral meeting in London. At that meeting, the Welsh and Scottish finance Ministers delivered a clear and unambiguous call for the UK Tory Government to set out plans to lift the public sector pay cap and reverse the planned further £3.5 billion of unallocated cuts in expenditure in 2019-20. What message does the First Minister have for the Chancellor of the Exchequer in advance of the budget for the need for the Tory Government to abandon its ideological obsession with austerity, considering the Welsh Government has seen its budget cut by 7 per cent in real terms since 2010?
Welsh: Diolch, Prif Weinidog. Bydd Canghellor Llywodraeth Dorïaidd y DU, Philip Hammond, yn cyflwyno ei gyllideb ar 22 Tachwedd yn siambr Tŷ'r Cyffredin. Yn ddiweddar, cafodd Gweinidogion cyllid Cymru a'r Alban gyfarfod ar y cyd gyda swyddogion y Trysorlys yn y cyfarfod cyllid pedair ochrog yn Llundain. Yn y cyfarfod hwnnw, gwnaeth Weinidogion cyllid Cymru a'r Alban alwad eglur a diamwys i Lywodraeth Dorïaidd y DU gyflwyno cynlluniau i ddiddymu cap cyflogau'r sector cyhoeddus a gwrthdroi'r £3.5 biliwn o doriadau ychwanegol heb eu neilltuo arfaethedig i wariant yn 2019-20. Pa neges sydd gan y Prif Weinidog i'r Canghellor cyn y gyllideb am yr angen i'r Llywodraeth Doraidd gefnu ar ei hobsesiwn ideolegol gyda chyni cyllidol, o ystyried bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gweld gostyngiad o 7 y cant i'w chyllideb mewn termau real ers 2010?
English: First of all, it's hugely important that the £3.5 billion of unallocated cuts are disposed of, to make sure that we are able to be in a position where we do not bear the extent of those cuts. Secondly, it's hugely important now, I believe, for the economy to have more money pumped into it, to make sure there's more money for investment, to make sure that jobs can be created as a result, and, of course, to enable the Welsh Government and indeed the Scottish Government to be able to invest in the infrastructure that Wales and Scotland need.
Welsh: Yn gyntaf oll, mae'n hynod o bwysig bod y £3.5 biliwn o doriadau heb eu neilltuo yn cael eu diddymu, i wneud yn siŵr ein bod yn gallu bod mewn sefyllfa lle nad ydym yn wynebu maint y toriadau hynny. Yn ail, mae'n hynod bwysig nawr, rwy'n credu, pwmpio mwy o arian i mewn i'r economi, er mwyn sicrhau bod mwy o arian ar gyfer buddsoddi, i wneud yn siŵr y gellir creu swyddi o ganlyniad, ac, wrth gwrs, i alluogi Llywodraeth Cymru a Llywodraeth yr Alban yn wir, i allu buddsoddi yn y seilwaith sydd ei angen ar Gymru a'r Alban.
English: First Minister, you described your approach to the public finances on 23 April, when you were asked, 'The Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell said £500bn more borrowing is in order to give the economy a bit of a boost - you'd go along with that then would you?' You answered, 'Yes, I would'. Do you still think borrowing £500 billion - 10 times the current UK deficit - would be sensible, and how would it be repaid?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, fe wnaethoch ddisgrifio eich agwedd at gyllid cyhoeddus ar 23 Ebrill, pan ofynnwyd i chi, Dywedodd Canghellor yr Wrthblaid John McDonnell bod angen benthyg £500 biliwn yn ychwanegol er mwyn rhoi ychydig o hwb i'r economi - byddech chi'n cyd-fynd â hynny, fyddech chi? Cafwyd yr ateb, 'Byddwn, mi fyddwn' gennych. A ydych chi'n dal i gredu y byddai benthyg £500 biliwn - 10 gwaith diffyg presennol y DU - yn synhwyrol, a sut y byddai'n cael ei ad-dalu?
English: I do believe that it's hugely important that, at a time when borrowing has never been, well, not quite as cheap as it was a week or so ago - but borrowing is historically cheap - it is reasonable and responsible for Governments to borrow money in order to pump that money into the economy. He will disagree; he's a monetarist, I'm sure. I'm not; I adhere to Keynesianism and I take the view that now is the time for Government to borrow that money, inject the money into the economy, create the jobs that we need, and then, of course, create the tax receipts that will pay that loan back.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n hynod o bwysig, ar adeg pan nad yw benthyg erioed wedi bod, wel, nid mor rhad ag yr oedd tua wythnos yn ôl - ond mae benthyg yn rhatach nag erioed - mae'n rhesymol ac yn gyfrifol i Lywodraethau fenthyg arian er mwyn pwmpio'r arian hwnnw i mewn i'r economi. Bydd ef yn anghytuno; mae'n arianyddwr, rwy'n siŵr. Dydw i ddim; rwy'n cyd-fynd ag egwyddorion Keynes ac o'r farn mai dyma'r amser i Lywodraeth fenthyg yr arian hwnnw, rhoi'r arian hwnnw i mewn i'r economi, creu'r swyddi sydd eu hangen arnom ni, ac yna, wrth gwrs, creu derbyniadau treth a fydd yn ad-dalu'r benthyciad hwnnw.
English: If that is the case - and I agree with you, First Minister, because of the historic low interest rates that we're still facing, notwithstanding the recent decision to have a slight increase - why aren't we borrowing at the full amount available to us? I mean, we are not actually even drawing down over the next three financial years the full £425 million that we could borrow. We're £50 million short of that, and we could be doing more through the mutual investment model as well. Why aren't we using the borrowing powers that we have to the full effect?
Welsh: Os yw hynny'n wir - ac rwy'n cytuno â chi, Prif Weinidog, oherwydd y cyfraddau llog is nag erioed yr ydym ni'n dal i'w hwynebu, er y penderfyniad diweddar i gael cynnydd bach - pam nad ydym ni'n benthyg y swm llawn sydd ar gael i ni? Hynny yw, nid ydym ni hyd yn oed yn manteisio dros y tair blynedd ariannol nesaf ar y £425 miliwn llawn y gallem ni ei fenthyg. Rydym ni £50 miliwn yn brin o hynny, a gallem ni fod yn gwneud mwy drwy'r model buddsoddi cydfuddiannol hefyd. Pam nad ydym ni'n defnyddio'r pwerau benthyg sydd gennym ni i gael y fantais fwyaf?
English: Well, the answer to that is that we are. We have to balance, of course, the power we have to borrow money against the need to pay that money back and the pressures that will be on the revenue budget in years to come. We're moving ahead with the mutual investment model, as the Member has said, and we will explore all models of prudent financial borrowing in order to deliver for the people of Wales.
Welsh: Wel, yr ateb i hynny yw ein bod ni. Mae'n rhaid i ni gydbwyso, wrth gwrs, y pŵer sydd gennym ni i fenthyg arian yn erbyn yr angen i ad-dalu'r arian hwnnw a'r pwysau a fydd ar y gyllideb refeniw yn y blynyddoedd i ddod. Rydym ni'n symud ymlaen â'r model buddsoddi cydfuddiannol, fel y mae'r Aelod wedi dweud, a byddwn yn edrych ar bob model benthyg ariannol darbodus er mwyn cyflawni dros bobl Cymru.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. First Minister, recently, we've had allegations put by a former cabinet Minister and by a senior special adviser that, in the last Assembly Government that you were First Minister to, there was bullying, mind games, favouritism, deliberate personal undermining, and that that culture was allowed to flourish unchecked. Also, the special adviser cited the behaviour as being 'pure poison'. Could I ask you to comment on those allegations, First Minister, as, if they are correct, then that is no way to run a Government, is it?
Welsh: Diolch i chi, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, yn ddiweddar, rydym ni wedi clywed honiadau gan gyn-Weinidog cabinet a chan uwch-gynghorydd arbennig bod, yn y Llywodraeth Cynulliad diwethaf yr oeddech chi'n Brif Weinidog arni, bwlio, gemau meddwl, ffafriaeth, tanseilio personol bwriadol, ac y caniatawyd i'r diwylliant hwnnw ffynnu heb gael ei atal. Hefyd, dywedodd y cynghorydd arbennig bod yr ymddygiad yn 'wenwyn pur'. A gaf i ofyn i chi wneud sylwadau ar yr honiadau hynny, Prif Weinidog, oherwydd, os ydyn nhw'n wir, yna nid dyna'r ffordd i redeg Llywodraeth, nage?
English: Well, first of all, can I say that I've heard the allegations of bullying by Leighton Andrews? I've listened to what he has to say. I heard what Steve Jones had to say, and what I will say is this: if people wish to come forward to me and explain things to me about their experience, then I'm more than willing for that to happen and they can contact me either through my office or through the Permanent Secretary.
Welsh: Wel, yn gyntaf oll, a gaf i ddweud fy mod i wedi clywed yr honiadau o fwlio gan Leighton Andrews? Rwyf wedi gwrando ar yr hyn sydd ganddo i'w ddweud. Clywais yr hyn yr oedd gan Steve Jones i'w ddweud, a dywedaf hyn: os yw pobl yn dymuno dod ataf i ac esbonio pethau i mi am eu profiad, yna rwy'n fwy na pharod i hynny ddigwydd a gallant gysylltu â mi naill ai drwy fy swyddfa neu drwy'r Ysgrifennydd Parhaol.
English: First Minister, the allegations are levelled very much at your office, and the allegations, or the people making the allegations, state quite clearly that they raised these allegations with you on numerous occasions and just gave up. They just gave up; they believed that they weren't being taken seriously and these issues were not being addressed. Indeed, in an Assembly written question to my colleague Darren Millar, who asked a question back in October/November 2014, you actually responded to him by saying that no allegations had been made. How can people have confidence that if they do choose to raise these serious concerns with you that they will be taken seriously? And in the absence of them having that confidence, would you commit to referring these allegations for investigation by an independent third party so that we can fully understand whether they are serious allegations that stack up, with action required, or that they have no substance and can be discarded?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, mae'r honiadau wedi eu cyfeirio'n bendant at eich swyddfa chi, ac mae'r honiadau, neu'r bobl sy'n gwneud yr honiadau, yn datgan yn gwbl eglur eu bod wedi codi'r honiadau hyn gyda chi ar sawl achlysur cyn rhoi'r ffidil yn y to. Fe roesant y ffiidil yn y to; roedden nhw'n credu nad oeddent yn cael eu cymryd o ddifrif ac nad oedd y materion hyn yn cael sylw. Yn wir, mewn cwestiwn ysgrifenedig yn y Cynulliad i'm cyd-Aelod, Darren Millar, a ofynnodd gwestiwn yn ôl ym mis Hydref/Tachwedd 2014, fe wnaethoch ymateb iddo trwy ddweud nad oedd unrhyw honiadau wedi eu gwneud. Sut gall pobl fod yn ffyddiog y byddant yn cael eu cymryd o ddifrif os byddant yn dewis codi'r pryderon difrifol hyn gyda chi ? Ac os nad yw'r ffydd hwnnw ganddynt, a wnewch chi ymrwymo i atgyfeirio'r honiadau hyn ar gyfer ymchwiliad gan drydydd parti annibynnol fel y gallwn ddeall yn llawn pa un a ydyn nhw'n honiadau difrifol sy'n dal dŵr, gyda chamau gweithredu gofynnol, neu nad oes unrhyw sylwedd iddynt ac y gellir eu rhoi o'r neilltu?
English: I think it's hugely important that, where people have concerns, they're able to express those concerns through a confidential process. I don't think doing it in the public domain is the way to do these things, and I invite people to come forward with any concerns that they might have and contact my office or contact the Permanent Secretary so that I can make an assessment of what was said to be happening at that time.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n hynod bwysig, pan fydd gan bobl bryderon, eu bod nhw'n gallu mynegi'r pryderon hynny trwy broses gyfrinachol. Nid wyf i'n credu mai yn y parth cyhoeddus y dylid gwneud y pethau hyn, ac rwy'n gwahodd pobl i ddod ymlaen gydag unrhyw bryderon y gallai fod ganddynt a chysylltu â'm swyddfa i neu gysylltu â'r Ysgrifennydd Parhaol fel y gallaf wneud asesiad o'r hyn y dywedwyd oedd yn digwydd bryd hynny.
English: Is it fair to say, though, First Minister, that these allegations were raised with you at the time? Because both individuals - senior individuals within the Government - are categorical in their allegations that they were raised on numerous occasions with you, not just on one-off occasions, but they were raised on numerous occasions with you, and indeed that they were levelled at your office, they were. They weren't levelled at the wider Government structure - they were levelled at the office of the First Minister. So, can you confirm that, unlike the answer you gave Darren Millar back in 2014, these allegations were raised with you and that you did investigate them at that time? And, as I said, if they do stack up, will you commit to referring them to an independent person so that they can be looked into and, actually, these actions addressed?
Welsh: Mae'n deg dweud, fodd bynnag, Prif Weinidog, y codwyd yr honiadau hyn gyda chi ar y pryd? Oherwydd mae'r ddau unigolyn - unigolion uwch o fewn y Llywodraeth - yn bendant yn eu honiadau eu bod wedi cael eu codi ar sawl achlysur gyda chi, nid dim ond ar achlysuron unigol, ond fe'u codwyd sawl tro gyda chi, ac yn wir eu bod wedi cael eu gwneud yn erbyn eich swyddfa, do. Nid oeddent yn cael eu gwneud yn erbyn strwythur ehangach y Llywodraeth - roedden nhw'n cael eu gwneud yn erbyn Swyddfa'r Prif Weinidog. Felly, a allwch chi gadarnhau, yn wahanol i'r ateb a roesoch i Darren Millar yn ôl yn 2014, y codwyd yr honiadau hyn gyda chi a'ch bod chi wedi ymchwilio iddynt ar y pryd? Ac, fel y dywedais, os oes rhinwedd iddynt, a wnewch chi ymrwymo i'w hatgyfeirio i unigolyn annibynnol fel y gellir ymchwilio iddynt, ac mewn gwirionedd, rhoi sylw i'r gweithredoedd hyn?
English: What I can say is that any issues that were brought to my attention at that time were dealt with. That's the answer that was given - and that answer is correct - back in 2014. If, however, there are other issues that people want to bring forward, then they are welcome to do so. But he asked me a direct question: were any issues raised with me dealt with? The answer to that is: yes, they were dealt with.
Welsh: Yr hyn y gallaf ei ddweud yw yr ymdriniwyd ag unrhyw faterion y tynnwyd fy sylw atynt bryd hynny. Dyna'r ateb a roddwyd - ac mae'r ateb hwnnw'n gywir - yn ôl yn 2014. Os, fodd bynnag, oes materion eraill y mae pobl eisiau eu codi, yna mae croeso iddyn nhw wneud hynny. Ond gofynnodd gwestiwn uniongyrchol i mi: a ymdriniwyd ag unrhyw faterion a godwyd gyda mi? Yr ateb i hynny yw: do ymdriniwyd â nhw.