English: Thank you for those remarks. I don't disagree with any of them, really. I think there's some small degree of emphasis, perhaps - very nuanced - that we would disagree with, but, in general, I think we're going in the right way. I think there's lots to be learned from how far we've come, what's been effective and what hasn't been effective and, in fairness, all over the western world, we have a similar problem, and the models that are being developed - we seek to learn from the best of those models. So, Housing First seems to me a very self-evidently sensible solution. It can take many months, however, to get somebody who has been rough-sleeping with a number of complex problems into the secure accommodation that they need. But we are very much looking to move away from the, sort of, staircase of earned reward that we've hitherto had. Not that that hasn't worked for some people. It will have worked for some people, but, really, what we're looking at is what's called trauma-centred approaches, individualised to the individual person, because every individual is different. So, I'm sure that there are perfectly good housing opportunities available that would make me very unhappy but that might make somebody else very happy. The point is to try and discover what that person is most likely to be able to sustain and what support services they require to do so. It may be, for some people, that being put into a flat and given a basic level of income is enough, and for others they will need a lot more support than that. So, the model is centered around that person-centered approach, and I was very privileged to meet a gentleman who had benefited from that and was very sure that without that he would not have been able to come in off the street. So, I agree with that. We are looking and we have various reviews going on, started by my colleague Rebecca Evans when she was the housing Minister - reviews into priority need and several of the other things that David Melding mentioned, looking to see what has been effective and what we need to do to shift the conversation onwards. I'm glad you like the Wrexham model because I think there is much to be said for that kind of assertive outreach, as it's called. Having said that, though, in the end, we have also got to respect what the individual themselves thinks that they need and is able to express to us. So, it is about the careful balance between that person's individual rights and our need to support that individual back into sustainable accommodation.
Welsh: Diolch i chi am y sylwadau hynny. Nid wyf i'n anghytuno ag unrhyw un ohonyn nhw, mewn gwirionedd. Ceir mymryn bach o bwyslais, efallai - rhyw arlliw bychan - y byddem yn anghytuno ag ef, ond, yn gyffredinol, rwy'n credu ein bod ni'n mynd i'r cyfeiriad iawn. Rwy'n credu bod llawer iawn i'w ddysgu o'r daith hyd yma, yr hyn sydd wedi bod yn effeithiol a'r hyn nad yw wedi bod yn effeithiol ac, er tegwch, ledled y byd gorllewinol, mae gennym ni broblem gyffelyb, a'r modelau sy'n cael eu datblygu - rydym ni'n ceisio dysgu oddi wrth y gorau yn y modelau hynny. Felly, mae Tai yn Gyntaf yn ymddangos i mi yn ateb synhwyrol iawn yn amlwg ynddo'i hun. Gall fod yn fisoedd lawer, serch hynny, cyn i rywun sydd wedi bod yn cysgu allan gyda nifer o broblemau cymhleth gael y llety diogel sydd ei angen arno. Ond rydym yn golygu ymbellhau i raddau helaeth iawn oddi wrth y math o flaenoriaethu sydd wedi bodoli hyd yn hyn. Er bod hynny wedi gweithio i rai. Bydd hynny wedi gweithio i rai, ond, mewn gwirionedd, yr hyn yr ydym yn edrych arno yw'r dulliau sy'n canolbwyntio ar drawma, sy'n unigryw i'r unigolyn, oherwydd mae pob unigolyn yn wahanol. Felly, rwy'n siŵr bod cyfleoedd tai pur dda ar gael y bydden nhw'n fy ngwneud i'n ddigalon iawn ond fe allen nhw wneud rhywun arall yn hapus iawn. Y pwynt yw ceisio darganfod yr hyn y mae'r unigolyn hwnnw'n fwyaf tebygol o allu ei gynnal a pha wasanaethau cymorth y bydd eu hangen i wneud hynny. Mae'n bosibl, i rai, y byddai cael lle mewn fflat a chynnig lefel sylfaenol o incwm yn ddigonol, a byddai angen llawer iawn mwy o gymorth na hynny ar eraill. Felly, mae'r model yn canolbwyntio ar ddull sydd wedi ei ganoli ar yr unigolyn hwnnw, ac roedd hi'n fraint fawr i gwrdd â gŵr bonheddig a oedd wedi elwa ar hynny ac a oedd yn siŵr iawn na fyddai ef wedi gallu dod i mewn oddi ar y stryd oni bai am hynny. Felly, rwy'n cytuno â hynny. Rydym ni'n edrych, ac mae gennym wahanol adolygiadau yn digwydd, a ddechreuwyd gan fy nghyd-Aelod, Rebecca Evans pan oedd hi'n Weinidog Tai - adolygiadau i angen blaenoriaethol a nifer o bethau eraill y soniodd David Melding amdanyn nhw, yn ystyried yr hyn sydd wedi bod yn effeithiol a'r hyn sydd ei angen arnom ni i'w wneud i symud y drafodaeth yn ei blaen. Rwy'n falch eich bod yn hoffi model Wrecsam gan fy mod yn credu bod llawer i'w ddweud dros y math hwnnw o allgymorth grymusol, fel y'i gelwir. Wedi dweud hynny, eto i gyd, yn y pen draw, mae'n rhaid i ni hefyd barchu'r hyn y mae'r unigolyn yn ei farnu sy'n angenrheidiol iddo ac yn gallu ei fynegi i ni. Felly, ystyr hyn yw cydbwysedd gofalus rhwng hawliau unigol yr unigolyn hwnnw a'n hangen ni i gynorthwyo'r unigolyn hwnnw'n ôl i gartref sy'n gynaliadwy.