English: I thank Huw Irranca-Davies for that question. Whether it's in 'Brexit and Devolution' or more latterly in 'Reforming our Union', we as a Government have sought consistently to be constructive advocates for a series of reforms for a better functioning union that gives full voice to the democratic legitimacy of the Senedd and the Welsh Government here in Wales, and establishes inter-governmental relations on the basis of equality of participation and parity of esteem. The arrangements we have at the moment are very far from meeting those tests, which we feel are the right tests for Wales. As you yourself say, Huw, in relation to the process of engaging across the UK on European exit, there have been many, many examples of the shortcomings in those relationships and those structures. I think most recently - you asked for information about representations - I wrote to Michael Gove asking, effectively, for a reboot of the engagement in relation to EU exit. We still hope for progress in relation to the inter-governmental review, which is the fundamental review of Government relations across the board. I was hoping that we would have made more progress in the last few weeks since the Joint Ministerial Committee (EU Negotiations) in May than we have been able to do. The Dunlop review remains unpublished, on the UK Government's part, and I'm sure we would all share a wish for that to be published. I think most recently, the inter-governmental workings in relation to COVID have been instructive in this sense. At the start of the process, clearly, COBRA was the forum in which decisions were made, but at no point did anyone reach for the JMC structures as a means of engaging on an ongoing basis. And I think that will tell us how, in truth, all Governments in all parts of the UK regard those structures as not fit for purpose and in need of pretty fundamental reform.
Welsh: Diolch i Huw Irranca-Davies am y cwestiwn hwnnw. Boed hynny ym maes 'Brexit a Datganoli' neu'n ddiweddarach ym maes 'Diwygio ein Hundeb', rydym ni fel Llywodraeth yn gyson wedi ceisio bod yn eiriolwyr adeiladol dros gyfres o ddiwygiadau ar gyfer undeb sy'n gweithio'n well, sy'n rhoi llais llawn i gyfreithlondeb democrataidd y Senedd a Llywodraeth Cymru yma yng Nghymru, ac sy'n sefydlu cysylltiadau rhynglywodraethol ar sail cydraddoldeb cyfranogiad a pharch cydradd. Mae'r trefniadau sydd gennym ni ar hyn o bryd yn bell o gyflawni'r profion hynny, sef y profion cywir i Gymru, yn ein barn ni. Fel y dywedwch chi, Huw, o ran y broses o ymgysylltu ar draws y DU ar adael Ewrop, mae enghreifftiau niferus wedi codi o'r diffygion yn y berthynas honno a'r strwythurau hynny. Rwy'n credu, yn fwyaf diweddar - fe wnaethoch ofyn am wybodaeth ynghylch sylwadau - fe ysgrifennais i at Michael Gove yn gofyn, i bob pwrpas, am ailgychwyn yr ymgysylltu mewn cysylltiad â gadael yr UE. Rydym yn dal i obeithio am gynnydd o ran yr adolygiad rhynglywodraethol, sef yr adolygiad sylfaenol o gysylltiadau'r Llywodraeth drwyddi draw. Roeddwn wedi gobeithio y byddem wedi gwneud mwy o gynnydd yn ystod yr ychydig wythnosau diwethaf ers Cyd-bwyllgor y Gweinidogion (Negodiadau'r UE) ym mis Mai nag yr ydym ni wedi gallu'i wneud. Mae adolygiad Dunlop yn dal heb ei gyhoeddi, ar ran Llywodraeth y DU, ac rwy'n siŵr y byddem ni oll yn rhannu'r dymuniad i hwnnw gael ei gyhoeddi. Rwy'n credu, yn fwyaf diweddar, bod y gwaith rhynglywodraethol o ran COVID wedi bod yn addysgiadol yn yr ystyr hwn. Ar ddechrau'r broses, yn amlwg, COBRA oedd y fforwm ar gyfer gwneud penderfyniadau, ond nid oedd neb ar unrhyw adeg wedi estyn am strwythurau Cyd-bwyllgor y Gweinidogion fel ffordd o ymgysylltu ar sail barhaus. Ac rwy'n credu y bydd hynny'n rhoi gwybod inni sut, mewn gwirionedd, y mae pob Llywodraeth ym mhob rhan o'r DU yn ystyried nad yw'r strwythurau hynny'n addas at y diben a bod angen eu diwygio'n eithaf sylfaenol.