English: They haven't taken that opportunity in this budget. To respond to the question that was asked earlier, it's not just where the money comes from, but what message the Government is conveying through this budget as a whole. It's not just looking at environmental sustainability that the commissioner is doing. It's the commissioner's role to ask more general questions as to whether decisions we're taking now are going to have a positive impact on future generations. And how we spend public funds is at the heart of that: are we making the right choices now? This is the fourth budget since the passing of the well-being of future generations Act, but we're still not seeing real culture change in Government. We must do more to ensure that that Act is not simply a piece of paper but the basis of future budgets. That's why we in Plaid Cymru have committed to a well-being budgetary process, similar to New Zealand's, and officials in the commissioner's office have said that they also wish to see a similar process adopted here. Health and care is another area where so much more could be achieved by securing a real shift to a preventative approach, thinking of the future now. It's a very small percentage of the budget that is allocated for that real preventative work. Certainly, there is no sign of transformation here, and I'm not just talking here about expenditure on the NHS, but the failure to bring together all of those elements that have an impact on people's health. We know full well about the relationship between ill-health and poverty. There's nothing new in this budget when it comes to tackling poverty. Time and time again, the Government is trying to do the same things rather than introducing the ambitious change required to bring those who are most in need out of poverty. We see concerns about the shortage of funding in areas such as housing, homelessness and the Supporting People programme - the Bevan Foundation say that there's little evidence of new methods being adopted to prevent poverty. For example, it's critical of the same old practice of emphasising the numbers of jobs created, whatever the levels of salary or the terms and conditions of those jobs. Local government plays a key role in delivering preventative elements of public services. Again, while we see an increase of £184 million, or 1.8 per cent in real terms, in the support for councils in Wales, the Welsh Local Government Association has estimated that councils need an increase of £250 million just to stand still. Local government can't play its full part in the preventative agenda that we want to see develop without receiving the support to do that. I'll turn to the Welsh language briefly. We can all agree on the value of having a target of a million Welsh speakers, but how can you square that with the real-terms reduction of £400,000 in expenditure on the Welsh language directly? In addition to that, there's a cut of £1.65 million for the Welsh language within schools. I had an opportunity in the Chamber last week to push the Minister for the Welsh language not to cut the budget for Welsh for adults. Now, I know that her view is that perhaps we need to look at spending on giving people opportunities to use the Welsh language. Now, whilst that is important, in places such as my constituency, there are plenty of opportunities to speak Welsh - it's giving people an opportunity to have those skills to participate in those opportunities that's important in those constituencies and those areas. And, as a whole, it appears that the Government's decisions on expenditure on the Welsh language are entirely contrary to what is needed in order to ensure the viability of the Welsh language in future years. I will conclude, Llywydd: the budget is part of the furniture of this Senedd, part of our governance, but it's more than that. It is crucial in terms of setting direction. It tells us what kind of Government we have. This is where rhetoric is supposed to become reality, the proof of the willingness of Government to implement their pledges. Yes, there are challenges. There are challenges in terms of Brexit and the costs of that, there are challenges in that we still don't have that full budget available to us, there is uncertainty as to how long the increases coming from the UK Government will continue, but this is not an innovative budget, it is the contrary of salami-slicing - where we see every department getting a slight uplift. That, I fear, is the most unimaginative form of budgeting that the Welsh Government could have adopted.
Welsh: Dydyn nhw ddim wedi cymryd y cyfle yna yn y gyllideb yma. Felly, i ateb y cwestiwn gafodd ei ofyn yn gynharach, nid dim ond o le mae pa arian yn dod ydy o, ond pa neges mae'r Llywodraeth yn ei gyrru allan drwy'r gyllideb drwyddi draw. Nid dim ond mesur a dylanwadu ar gynaliadwyedd amgylcheddol mae'r comisiynydd, wrth gwrs. Rôl y comisiynydd ydy gofyn yn gyffredinol ydy'r penderfyniadau rydym ni'n eu gwneud rwan yn mynd i gael effaith gadarnhaol ar genedlaethau a ddaw ar ein holau ni. Ac mae sut rydym ni'n gwario arian cyhoeddus yn ganolog i hynny: ydym ni'n gwneud y dewisiadau iawn rŵan? Dyma'r bedwaredd gyllideb ers pasio Deddf llesiant cenedlaethau'r dyfodol, ond dydyn ni'n dal ddim yn gweld newid go iawn mewn diwylliant yn y Llywodraeth. Mae'n rhaid gwneud mwy i sicrhau nad ryw ddarn o bapur ydy'r Ddeddf, ond rhywbeth sy'n sail gadarn i gyllidebau'r dyfodol. Dyna pam rydym ni ym Mhlaid Cymru wedi ymrwymo i broses gyllidol lesol, yn debyg i Seland Newydd, ac mi ddywedodd swyddogion swyddfa'r comisiynydd eu bod hwythau yn dymuno gweld proses debyg yn cael ei dilyn yma. Mae iechyd a gofal yn un o'r meysydd eraill lle gallai cymaint fwy o fudd ddod o sicrhau sifft go iawn at system ataliol, a meddwl am y dyfodol rŵan. Cyfran fach iawn o'r gyllideb sydd wedi ei neilltuo ar gyfer gwaith ataliol go iawn. Yn sicr, does yna dim arwydd o drawsnewid, a dwi'n sôn yn fan hyn nid dim ond am wariant ar yr NHS, ond yn hytrach am fethiant i ddod ynghyd yr holl elfennau hynny sy'n cael impact ar iechyd pobl. Rydym ni'n gwybod yn iawn am y cysylltiad rhwng afiechyd a thlodi. Does yna ddim byd newydd yn y gyllideb yma pan fo'n dod at daclo tlodi. Dro ar ôl tro, mae'r Llywodraeth yn trio'r un pethau yn hytrach na chyflwyno'r math o newid uchelgeisiol sydd ei angen i dynnu'r rhai sydd fwyaf angen help allan o dlodi. Rydym ni'n gweld y pryderon eto am ddiffyg lefelau cyllid mewn meysydd fel tai, digartrefedd, y rhaglen Cefnogi Pobl - y Bevan Foundation yn dweud mai prin ydy'r dystiolaeth o ffyrdd newydd yn cael eu cyflwyno i atal tlodi. Er enghraifft, mae'n feirniadol o'r un hen arfer o roi pwyslais ar nifer y swyddi sy'n cael eu creu, gwaeth beth yw lefel y cyflog na thelerau'r swyddi hynny. Mae llywodraeth leol, wedyn, yn chwarae rôl gwbl allweddol mewn delifro elfennau ataliol o wasanaethau cyhoeddus. Eto, tra ein bod ni'n gweld cynnydd o £184 miliwn, neu 1.8 y cant mewn termau real, yn y gefnogaeth i gynghorau Cymru, mi oedd Cymdeithas Lywodraeth Leol Cymru wedi amcangyfrif bod cynghorau angen cynnydd o £250 miliwn dim ond i allu sefyll yn llonydd. All llywodraeth leol ddim chwarae rhan lawn ar y dirwedd ataliol rydym ni am ei weld yn datblygu heb gael y gefnogaeth i wneud hynny. Gwnaf i droi at y Gymraeg yn sydyn. Rydym ni i gyd yn gallu cytuno ar werth anelu at y nod o filiwn o siaradwyr Cymraeg, ond sut mae sgwario efo hynny y gostyngiad mewn termau real o £400,000 mewn gwariant ar yr iaith Gymraeg yn uniongyrchol. Ac, ar ben hynny, mae yna doriad o £1.65 miliwn ar gyfer y Gymraeg o fewn addysg - felly, mewn ysgolion. Mi ges i'r cyfle yn y Siambr yr wythnos diwethaf i wthio'r Gweinidog dros y Gymraeg i beidio â thorri cyllideb dysgu Cymraeg i oedolion. Dwi'n gwybod mai ei barn hi ydy bod efallai eisiau edrych ar wario ar roi cyfleon i bobl siarad y Gymraeg. Tra bod hynny, wrth gwrs, yn bwysig iawn, mewn llefydd fel fy etholaeth i, mae yna hen ddigon o gyfleon i siarad yr iaith - rhoi cyfle i bobl drwy adnoddau dysgu Cymraeg i gael y sgiliau iaith i gymryd rhan yn y pethau hynny sy'n bwysig yn yr etholaethau a'r ardaloedd hynny. Ac, yn eu cyfanrwydd, mae'n ymddangos bod penderfyniadau'r Llywodraeth ar gyllid ar y Gymraeg yn mynd yn gwbl groes i'r hyn sydd ei angen i sicrhau llesiant y Gymraeg mewn blynyddoedd i ddod. Mi wnaf i gloi, Llywydd: mae cyllideb yn rhan o ddodrefn y Senedd yma, yn rhan o'r dodrefn llywodraethol, ond mae'n fwy na hynny. Mae'n allweddol o ran gosod cyfeiriad. Mae'n dweud sut Lywodraeth sydd gennym ni. Dyma le mae'r rhethreg i fod i droi yn realiti, y prawf o barodrwydd Llywodraeth i weithredu ar eu haddewidion. Oes, mae yna heriau. Mae yna heriau o ran Brexit a beth fydd costau hynny, mae yna heriau o ran dyw'r gyllideb lawn yn dal ddim gennym ni, mae yna ansicrwydd ynglŷn ag am ba hyd fydd y cynnydd sydd wedi dod gan Lywodraeth Prydain yn parhau, ond dydy hon ddim yn gyllideb arloesol, mae'n rhyw groes o salami-slicing - cyllideb lle rydym ni'n gweld pob cyllideb, pob adran, yn codi rhyw fymryn. Dyna, dwi'n ofni, oedd y dull mwyaf di-ddychymyg o gyllido y gallai Llywodraeth Cymru fod wedi ei ddewis y tro yma.