English: Llywydd, can I thank Buffy Williams for those points? And she's right, of course, that we need to make sure that households in Wales are as aware of the help as possible. And we're doing that in a number of ways, working closely with our local authority colleagues, making sure that, through third sector organisations, there's readily accessible information for people, and that, when somebody appears in one part of the system looking for help, we make sure that, at that point of entry, they're given good advice about any other forms of help that are available here in Wales. Now, we do that within the limits of the powers and the funding that we have available to us, and independent commentators have recognised that the degree of help available through the Welsh Government is greater than is available in any other part of the United Kingdom. But, the point that Buffy Williams started with, Llywydd, is surely the most important one - the UK Government needs to do more to make sure that people are helped, and the single most obvious source of assistance is so readily to hand. Only last week, the chair of Tesco said that he thought there was an overwhelming case for a windfall tax. The chief executive of BP gave an assurance that, if there were a windfall tax, it would not affect that company's intention to invest £18 billion over the next eight years in energy measures in the UK. The Prime Minister tells us that he doesn't like a windfall tax and he doesn't think it's the right way forward on the same day that the Chancellor of the Exchequer was saying that no options were off the table and that he was open-minded about a windfall tax. Well, which is it? It really is time that the UK Government sorted out their own position on this matter, and did so in a way that takes money from firms that are making enormous excess profits because of the rise in energy costs and provides that money to exactly the sorts of households that Buffy Williams has highlighted this afternoon.
Welsh: Llywydd, a gaf i ddiolch i Buffy Williams am y pwyntiau yna? Ac mae hi'n iawn, wrth gwrs, bod angen i ni wneud yn siŵr bod aelwydydd yng Nghymru mor ymwybodol o'r cymorth â phosibl. Ac rydym ni'n gwneud hynny mewn nifer o ffyrdd, gan weithio'n agos gyda'n cydweithwyr yn yr awdurdodau lleol, gan wneud yn siŵr, drwy sefydliadau trydydd sector, fod gwybodaeth ar gael i bobl yn rhwydd, a phan fydd rhywun yn ymddangos mewn un rhan o'r system yn chwilio am gymorth, ein bod ni'n gwneud yn siŵr, ar y pwynt mynediad hwnnw, y rhoddir cyngor da iddyn nhw ar unrhyw fathau eraill o gymorth sydd ar gael yma yng Nghymru. Nawr, rydym ni'n gwneud hynny o fewn terfynau'r pwerau a'r cyllid sydd ar gael i ni, ac mae sylwebyddion annibynnol wedi cydnabod bod graddau'r cymorth sydd ar gael drwy Lywodraeth Cymru yn fwy na'r hyn sydd ar gael mewn unrhyw ran arall o'r Deyrnas Unedig. Ond, yn sicr, y pwynt y dechreuodd Buffy Williams gydag ef, Llywydd, yw'r un pwysicaf - mae angen i Lywodraeth y DU wneud mwy i wneud yn siŵr bod pobl yn cael eu helpu, ac mae'r un ffynhonnell fwyaf amlwg o gymorth wrth law mor rhwydd. Dim ond yr wythnos diwethaf, dywedodd cadeirydd Tesco ei fod yn credu bod achos anorchfygol dros dreth ffawdelw. Rhoddodd prif weithredwr BP sicrwydd, pe byddai treth ffawdelw, na fyddai'n effeithio ar fwriad y cwmni hwnnw i fuddsoddi £18 biliwn dros yr wyth mlynedd nesaf mewn mesurau ynni yn y DU. Mae Prif Weinidog y DU yn dweud wrthym nad yw'n hoffi treth ffawdelw ac nad yw'n credu mai dyma'r ffordd gywir ymlaen ar yr un diwrnod ag yr oedd Canghellor y Trysorlys yn dweud nad oedd unrhyw opsiynau oddi ar y bwrdd a'i fod yn agored ei feddwl am dreth ffawdelw. Wel, pa un ydyw? Mae wir yn amser i Lywodraeth y DU roi trefn ar eu safbwynt eu hunain ar y mater hwn, a gwneud hynny mewn ffordd sy'n cymryd arian oddi wrth gwmnïau sy'n gwneud elw gormodol enfawr oherwydd y cynnydd i gostau ynni ac yn darparu'r arian hwnnw i'r union fathau o aelwydydd y mae Buffy Williams wedi tynnu sylw atyn nhw y prynhawn yma.