techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Yes, I do. I agree fully with that. I think that every time the UK Government makes a promise to Wales and to the people of Wales that it doesn't keep, it does risk the break-up of the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom has to be a group of nations where we have mutual respect, and where we treat each other with equality, and we don't have that at the moment. That's not to say that the UK Government can't today make changes in that respect and change its approach to the United Kingdom. I really don't think that down the end of the M4 the UK Government really hears the mood music in Wales and hears how angry and fed up people are in Wales with the UK Government. But, of course, there'll be opportunities for them to hear that loud and clear in the months ahead.
Welsh: Ydw, rwy'n cytuno. Rwy'n cytuno'n llwyr â hynny. Yn fy marn i, bob tro y bydd Llywodraeth y DU yn gwneud addewid nad yw'n ei gadw i Gymru ac i bobl Cymru, mae'n mentro chwalu'r Deyrnas Unedig. Mae'n rhaid i'r Deyrnas Unedig fod yn grŵp o genhedloedd lle mae gennym barch cydradd at ein gilydd, lle rydym yn trin ein gilydd yn gyfartal, ac nid yw hynny'n digwydd ar hyn o bryd. Nid yw hynny'n golygu na all Llywodraeth y DU wneud newidiadau yn hynny o beth heddiw, a newid ei hymagwedd at y Deyrnas Unedig. Ni chredaf fod Llywodraeth y DU ar ben arall yr M4 yn wirioneddol ymwybodol o'r teimladau yng Nghymru ac yn clywed pa mor ddig yw pobl yng Nghymru gyda Llywodraeth y DU. Ond wrth gwrs, daw cyfleoedd iddynt glywed hynny'n glir iawn dros y misoedd nesaf.
English: And, of course, not only are they denying us the funding that's rightfully ours, but they're also denying us the fiscal levers that would really help make a difference to people's lives here in Wales, from intentionally restricting what fiscal powers we have to denying us powers over other key levers like corporation tax, value added tax and air passenger duty. As you said earlier in a previous answer, we just don't have the fiscal firepower. Again, I suppose we shouldn't be surprised, because it's no secret that this Tory Westminster Government is intent not only on undermining devolution, but on actually undoing devolution, and taking back powers to Westminster. So, do you share my concerns that the Westminster Government's intention to review the Wales Act 2014 is an ominous sign that the Tories are coming after devolution, and that it isn't just our money that they'll take off us, but our powers as well?
Welsh: Ac wrth gwrs, nid yn unig eu bod yn gwadu'r cyllid y mae gennym hawl iddo, ond maent hefyd yn gwadu'r ysgogiadau cyllidol i ni a fyddai'n helpu i wneud gwahaniaeth go iawn i fywydau pobl yma yng Nghymru, o gyfyngu'n fwriadol ar y pwerau cyllidol sydd gennym i wadu pwerau i ni dros ysgogiadau allweddol eraill fel treth gorfforaeth, treth ar werth a tholl teithwyr awyr. Fel y dywedoch chi mewn ateb blaenorol, nid oes gennym y grym cyllidol. Unwaith eto, mae'n debyg na ddylem synnu, gan nad yw'n gyfrinach fod y Llywodraeth Dorïaidd hon yn San Steffan yn benderfynol nid yn unig o danseilio datganoli, ond o ddadwneud datganoli, a mynd â phwerau yn ôl i San Steffan. Felly, a ydych yn rhannu fy mhryderon fod bwriad Llywodraeth San Steffan i adolygu Deddf Cymru 2014 yn arwydd fod y Torïaid yn bygwth datganoli, ac nad ein harian yn unig y byddant yn ei gymryd gennym, ond ein pwerau hefyd?
English: There's so much to respond to there. I completely share your concerns about the lack of flexibilities that the Welsh Government has. I know that this has been something that has actually received agreement across the Senedd in the past, in terms of the need for the Welsh Government to have greater flexibility at year end to have a full financial year to spend money that is often presented to us very late on in the financial year. Our ability to borrow more in the aggregate and more on an annual basis would be useful in terms of managing our funding as well. So, there's a whole range of flexibilities that we want to see there. There's a whole range of tax powers that we would want to see come to Wales - you mentioned air passenger duty. The huge trouble that we're having even really getting proper conversation now with the UK Government in respect of the vacant land tax is another example of where things just aren't satisfactory at the moment. And so the recent announcements in terms of the UK Government's approach to the Welsh Government and Welsh powers are of concern, and obviously we will want to be engaging with this fully. Again, this is an area where those of us who share views will want to work collaboratively.
Welsh: Mae cymaint i ymateb iddo yno. Rwy'n sicr yn rhannu eich pryderon ynglŷn â'r diffyg hyblygrwydd sydd gan Lywodraeth Cymru. Gwn fod hyn wedi bod yn rhywbeth sydd wedi ennyn cytundeb ar draws y Senedd yn y gorffennol, o ran yr angen i Lywodraeth Cymru gael mwy o hyblygrwydd ar ddiwedd y flwyddyn i gael blwyddyn ariannol lawn i wario arian sy'n aml yn cael ei gyflwyno i ni yn hwyr iawn yn y flwyddyn ariannol. Byddai ein gallu i fenthyca mwy yn ei grynswth a mwy yn flynyddol hefyd yn ddefnyddiol o ran rheoli ein cyllid. Felly, mae sawl math o hyblygrwydd rydym am ei weld. Mae ystod eang o bwerau trethu y byddem am eu gweld yn dod i Gymru - fe sonioch chi am doll teithwyr awyr. Mae'r drafferth enfawr rydym yn ei chael hyd yn oed i gael sgwrs iawn yn awr gyda Llywodraeth y DU ynghylch y dreth ar dir gwag yn enghraifft arall o sefyllfa nad yw'n foddhaol ar hyn o bryd. Ac felly, mae'r cyhoeddiadau diweddar ar ymagwedd Llywodraeth y DU tuag at Lywodraeth Cymru a phwerau Cymru yn peri pryder, ac yn amlwg, dylem fod yn rhoi sylw llawn i'r mater. Unwaith eto, mae hwn yn faes lle bydd y rheini ohonom sy'n rhannu'r farn hon yn awyddus i gydweithio.
English: We recognise the importance of maintaining our road network, which represents a £17 billion asset. Within the climate change portfolio, we are investing £0.5 billion to maintain a safe and reliable network. Alongside this, the local government settlement provides almost £16 billion to support their responsibilities in these and other areas.
Welsh: Rydym yn cydnabod pwysigrwydd cynnal a chadw ein rhwydwaith ffyrdd, sy'n cynrychioli ased o £17 biliwn. O fewn y portffolio newid hinsawdd, rydym yn buddsoddi £0.5 biliwn i gynnal rhwydwaith diogel a dibynadwy. Yn ogystal â hyn, mae'r setliad llywodraeth leol yn darparu bron i £16 biliwn i gefnogi eu cyfrifoldebau yn y meysydd hyn a meysydd eraill.
English: Thank you. Rural areas like my colleague Peter Fox's constituency of Monmouth - and I'd just like to declare an interest as a Monmouthshire county councillor still - tend to have very large road networks that need a lot of upkeep, yet we see the Welsh Government has allocated no additional funds through the resilient roads grant. If the Welsh Government are going to persist with the agenda of building no more roads, then additional funding should be allocated to maintain the current roads and clear the maintenance backlog. We all want a cleaner, greener Wales, but letting our roads fall into disrepair is not the way to achieve it. The Asphalt Industry Alliance annual local authority road maintenance survey found that Welsh highway authorities would need an additional £36.3 million per local authority to repair roads across the counties. It would take 10 years for all roads to be repaired. So, Minister, what steps are being taken to make sure our roads are fit for purpose for a twenty-first century Wales and why hasn't any extra money been allocated to fix our dire roads in Wales?
Welsh: Diolch. Mae ardaloedd gwledig fel etholaeth fy nghyd-Aelod, Peter Fox, ym Mynwy - a hoffwn ddatgan buddiant fel cynghorydd sir yn sir Fynwy o hyd - yn dueddol o fod â rhwydweithiau ffyrdd mawr iawn y mae angen llawer o waith cynnal a chadw arnynt, ond er hynny, gwelwn nad yw Llywodraeth Cymru wedi dyrannu unrhyw arian ychwanegol drwy'r grant ffyrdd cydnerth. Os yw Llywodraeth Cymru am barhau â'r agenda i beidio ag adeiladu mwy o ffyrdd, dylid dyrannu cyllid ychwanegol i gynnal a chadw'r ffyrdd presennol a mynd i'r afael ag ôl-groniad y gwaith cynnal a chadw. Mae pob un ohonom yn dymuno gweld Cymru lanach a gwyrddach, ond nid gadael i'n ffyrdd ddadfeilio yw'r ffordd o gyflawni hynny. Canfu arolwg cynnal a chadw ffyrdd awdurdodau lleol blynyddol yr Asphalt Industry Alliance y byddai angen £36.3 miliwn ychwanegol ar awdurdodau priffyrdd pob un o awdurdodau lleol Cymru i atgyweirio ffyrdd ar draws y siroedd. Byddai'n cymryd 10 mlynedd i atgyweirio pob ffordd. Felly, Weinidog, pa gamau sy'n cael eu cymryd i sicrhau bod ein ffyrdd yn addas i'r diben yng Nghymru yn yr unfed ganrif ar hugain a pham nad oes unrhyw arian ychwanegol wedi'i ddyrannu i atgyweirio ein ffyrdd ofnadwy yng Nghymru?
English: The Member would have heard me say in response to a previous question that today I have written to leaders of local authorities confirming an additional £70 million of funding for this financial year, and that was in part in response to the discussions that I've had in relation to their concerns about road maintenance. I do recognise the important of road maintenance, and I'm often amazed when I hear UK Government Ministers suggest that Wales is overfunded. I even hear it within this Chamber in respect of the needs-based formula that provides Wales with funding. One of the reasons why we do have additional funding here in Wales is because of our dispersed settlement pattern. I was just reminded when Laura Anne Jones was speaking about the fact that there are 6.7 miles of road for every 1,000 people in Wales and 3.4 miles in England. So, there are almost twice as many roads for us to maintain per head of population here in Wales than in England. And obviously, our dispersed population means higher costs in respect of education and other services. So, I just wanted to give that as an example as to why the funding formula works as it does. I think that communities across Wales benefit as a result of what was agreed by Mark Drakeford when he was in this post.
Welsh: Byddai'r Aelod wedi fy nghlywed yn dweud mewn ymateb i gwestiwn blaenorol fy mod wedi ysgrifennu heddiw at arweinwyr awdurdodau lleol i gadarnhau £70 miliwn o gyllid ychwanegol ar gyfer y flwyddyn ariannol hon, ac roedd hynny'n rhannol mewn ymateb i'r trafodaethau a gefais mewn perthynas â'u pryderon ynghylch cynnal a chadw ffyrdd. Rwy'n cydnabod pwysigrwydd cynnal a chadw ffyrdd, ac rwy'n aml yn rhyfeddu pan glywaf Weinidogion Llywodraeth y DU yn awgrymu bod Cymru'n cael ei gorariannu. Rwyf hyd yn oed yn clywed hynny yn y Siambr hon ynghylch y fformiwla sy'n seiliedig ar anghenion ac sy'n darparu cyllid i Gymru. Un o'r rhesymau pam fod gennym gyllid ychwanegol yma yng Nghymru yw oherwydd ein patrwm anheddu gwasgaredig. Cefais fy atgoffa pan oedd Laura Anne Jones yn siarad am y ffaith bod 6.7 milltir o ffyrdd ar gyfer pob 1,000 o bobl yng Nghymru a 3.4 milltir yn Lloegr. Felly, mae bron ddwywaith cymaint o ffyrdd fesul y pen o'r boblogaeth i ni eu cynnal yma yng Nghymru nag yn Lloegr. Ac yn amlwg, mae ein poblogaeth wasgaredig yn golygu costau uwch mewn perthynas ag addysg a gwasanaethau eraill. Felly, roeddwn am roi hynny fel enghraifft i ddangos pam fod y fformiwla ariannu'n gweithio fel y mae. Credaf fod cymunedau ledled Cymru ar eu hennill o ganlyniad i'r hyn y cytunodd Mark Drakeford arno pan oedd yn y swydd hon.
English: Thank you. Sorry, I was hoping to come in as a supplementary on Laura Jones's question, so I'm just trying to find my right place. Thank you very much. I'm very pleased to hear of the extra capital funding that's coming forward this year for highway maintenance -
Welsh: Diolch. Mae'n ddrwg gennyf, roeddwn wedi gobeithio gofyn cwestiwn atodol i gwestiwn Laura Jones, felly rwy'n ceisio dod o hyd i fy lle iawn. Diolch yn fawr iawn. Rwy'n falch iawn o glywed am y cyllid cyfalaf ychwanegol sy'n cael ei ddarparu eleni ar gyfer cynnal a chadw priffyrdd -
English: You need to ask -
Welsh: Mae angen ichi ofyn -
English: Sorry, can I declare that I'm a Flintshire county councillor? Thank you.
Welsh: Mae'n ddrwg gennyf, a gaf fi ddatgan fy mod yn gynghorydd sir yn sir y Fflint? Diolch.
English: Yes, you can declare, and now you can ask the question that you've tabled as question 4, even though you tried to be quick there and get in your supplementary on question 3 as well. We'll carry on and ask question 4, please.
Welsh: Gallwch, gallwch ddatgan, a nawr gallwch ofyn y cwestiwn rydych wedi'i gyflwyno fel cwestiwn 4, er ichi geisio bod yn gyflym a chynnwys eich cwestiwn atodol i gwestiwn 3 hefyd. Fe wnawn ni barhau, a gofynnwch gwestiwn 4, os gwelwch yn dda.
English: Okay. Thank you very much.
Welsh: Iawn. Diolch yn fawr iawn.
English: I ensure fair funding for all local authorities in Wales by prioritising local government and health services in budget decisions and through a transparent, equitable and jointly produced distribution formula with our local government partners.
Welsh: Rwy'n sicrhau cyllid teg i bob awdurdod lleol yng Nghymru drwy roi blaenoriaeth i lywodraeth leol a gwasanaethau iechyd wrth wneud penderfyniadau ar y gyllideb a thrwy fformiwla ddosbarthu dryloyw a theg a gynhyrchir ar y cyd â'n partneriaid llywodraeth leol.
English: Thank you for that answer, Minister. It's often raised with me that the funding formula for local authorities needs addressing. I think it's been raised here quite a few times as well. For the last few years, the debate has gone round and round in circles, with council leaders writing to Welsh Government, Welsh Government then saying the Welsh Local Government Association need to agree as a collective, and then they have different views because there are huge winners and losers. But, councils are still feeling the pain of austerity, and although this year was a good settlement, the variance per capita and per council can be hugely significant, with the gap between the highest and lowest paid council widening year upon year. The cumulative impact can mean the baseline for some remains low each year, so the difference between two neighbouring councils can be £650 per resident and £50 million or more per annum. For example, a £20 million highways maintenance grant through the formula can equate to £1.2 million for one authority and £850,000 for another. If this continues each year then the cumulative impact continues to grow as well, so one will do well while the other one struggles. So, could the distribution committee that sits below the finance committee investigate the funding formula going forward, or having a funding floor?
Welsh: Diolch am eich ateb, Weinidog. Mater sy'n cael ei ddwyn i fy sylw'n aml yw bod angen mynd i'r afael â'r fformiwla ariannu ar gyfer awdurdodau lleol. Credaf ei fod wedi'i godi yma gryn dipyn o weithiau hefyd. Am yr ychydig flynyddoedd diwethaf, mae'r ddadl wedi mynd rownd a rownd mewn cylchoedd, gydag arweinwyr cynghorau yn ysgrifennu at Lywodraeth Cymru, Llywodraeth Cymru wedyn yn dweud bod angen i Gymdeithas Llywodraeth Leol Cymru gytuno ar y cyd, ac yna mae ganddynt safbwyntiau gwahanol gan fod rhai'n ennill a rhai'n colli. Ond mae cynghorau'n dal i deimlo effaith cyni cyllidol, ac er bod setliad eleni'n un da, gall yr amrywiant fesul y pen a fesul cyngor fod yn hynod sylweddol, gyda'r bwlch rhwng y cyngor sy'n cael y lefel uchaf o gyllid a'r cyngor sy'n cael y lefel isaf yn tyfu o flwyddyn i flwyddyn. Gall yr effaith gronnol olygu bod y llinell sylfaen ar gyfer rhai yn parhau i fod yn isel bob blwyddyn, felly gall y gwahaniaeth rhwng dau gyngor cyfagos fod yn £650 fesul trigolyn a £50 miliwn neu fwy y flwyddyn. Er enghraifft, gall grant cynnal a chadw priffyrdd o £20 miliwn drwy'r fformiwla gyfateb i £1.2 miliwn ar gyfer un awdurdod ac £850,000 i awdurdod arall. Os bydd hyn yn parhau bob blwyddyn mae'r effaith gronnol yn parhau i dyfu hefyd, felly bydd un yn gwneud yn dda tra bo'r llall yn ei chael hi'n anodd. Felly, a allai'r pwyllgor dosbarthu sy'n dod o dan y pwyllgor cyllid ymchwilio i'r fformiwla ariannu wrth symud ymlaen, neu i gael cyllid gwaelodol?
English: I would remind Mark Isherwood that the average increase across Wales for the local government settlement next year is 9.4 per cent and Flintshire has a 9.2 per cent increase, so it's not very far off the average.
Welsh: Hoffwn atgoffa Mark Isherwood mai'r cynnydd cyfartalog ledled Cymru ar gyfer y setliad llywodraeth leol y flwyddyn nesaf yw 9.4 y cant a bod sir y Fflint yn cael cynnydd o 9.2 y cant, felly nid yw'n bell iawn oddi ar y cyfartaledd.
English: The cost of legislation is met from within the allocations of portfolio budgets, and Ministers take costs into account when prioritising spend for a financial year. When a Minister introduces a Bill, our planned approach for monitoring, reviewing and evaluating the policy is set out in the regulatory impact assessment.
Welsh: Telir cost deddfwriaeth o ddyraniadau cyllidebau portffolio, ac mae Gweinidogion yn ystyried costau wrth flaenoriaethu gwariant ar gyfer blwyddyn ariannol. Pan fydd Gweinidog yn cyflwyno Bil, caiff ein dull gweithredu arfaethedig ar gyfer monitro, adolygu a gwerthuso'r polisi ei nodi yn yr asesiad effaith rheoleiddiol.
English: Thank you. As the Minister will be aware, I am totally opposed to bringing in unnecessary legislation - the Trade Union (Wales) Act 2017 and the Children (Abolition of Defence of Reasonable Punishment) (Wales) Act 2020 to name but two. On the latter, the explanatory memorandum stated that the preferred option to legislate to remove the defence of reasonable punishment in Wales would cost a total to our taxpayers of between £6 million and £8 million. So far, the Welsh Government has spent £1,650,098. Section 1 of this Act comes into force in March. Now, since the legislation received Royal Assent, our nation has been hit by COVID-19. The impact alone on children's mental health has been severe, and the Children's Commissioner for Wales has had to speak up loudly about the fact that there are no suitable places for young people in mental health crisis. So, we do have to prioritise support for those children, who, through no fault of their own, are suffering because of the response to the pandemic. Given these concerns that there are no dedicated mental health crisis centres in Wales for young people, and the fact that you've spent £1.6 million up to now - clearly there is more money allocated for the Bill I mentioned - would you be willing to co-operate with the Deputy Minister for Social Services to review the effectiveness of the spend on abolition of defence of reasonable punishment and maybe be quite radical and look to divert some of that funding to front-line mental health services for young people? Diolch.
Welsh: Diolch. Fel y gŵyr y Gweinidog, rwy'n gwrthwynebu cyflwyno deddfwriaeth ddiangen yn llwyr - Deddf yr Undebau Llafur (Cymru) 2017 a Deddf Plant (Diddymu Amddiffyniad Cosb Resymol) (Cymru) 2020, i enwi ond dwy. Ar yr ail, nododd y memorandwm esboniadol y byddai'r opsiwn a ffefrir i ddeddfu i ddileu amddiffyniad cosb resymol yng Nghymru yn costio cyfanswm o rhwng £6 miliwn ac £8 miliwn i'n trethdalwyr. Hyd yn hyn, mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gwario £1,650,098. Daw Adran 1 o'r Ddeddf hon i rym ym mis Mawrth. Nawr, ers i'r ddeddfwriaeth gael Cydsyniad Brenhinol, mae ein gwlad wedi cael ei tharo gan COVID-19. Mae'r effaith ar iechyd meddwl plant yn unig wedi bod yn ddifrifol, ac mae Comisiynydd Plant Cymru wedi gorfod codi ei llais ynglŷn â'r ffaith nad oes lleoedd addas i bobl ifanc mewn argyfwng iechyd meddwl. Felly, mae'n rhaid inni flaenoriaethu cymorth i'r plant sydd, heb unrhyw fai arnynt eu hunain, yn dioddef oherwydd yr ymateb i'r pandemig. O ystyried y pryderon nad oes unrhyw ganolfannau argyfwng iechyd meddwl pwrpasol yng Nghymru ar gyfer pobl ifanc, a'r ffaith eich bod wedi gwario £1.6 miliwn hyd yn hyn - yn amlwg, mae mwy o arian wedi'i ddyrannu ar gyfer y Bil y soniais amdano - a fyddech yn fodlon cydweithredu â'r Dirprwy Weinidog Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol i adolygu effeithiolrwydd y gwariant ar ddileu amddiffyniad cosb resymol, a bod yn eithaf radical efallai ac ystyried dargyfeirio rhywfaint o'r cyllid hwnnw i wasanaethau iechyd meddwl rheng flaen i bobl ifanc? Diolch.
English: Well, I'm not going to make any apology for investing in removing the defence of reasonable punishment and the work that needs to sit alongside that, and I know that - . It seems that Janet Finch-Saunders and I have different views on what is necessary legislation and what isn't, but I will say, in respect of the budget for the period ahead, we have allocated an additional £100 million in respect of mental health, and some of that will be very much looking to bolster our whole-school approach to ensure that children and young people do get the support they need at the earliest point. So, mental health is a major priority for this Government, and you will see it reflected in the budget that we published before Christmas.
Welsh: Wel, nid wyf am ymddiheuro am fuddsoddi i ddileu'r amddiffyniad cosb resymol a'r gwaith sydd ei angen ochr yn ochr â hynny, a gwn - . Mae'n ymddangos bod gan Janet Finch-Saunders a minnau safbwyntiau gwahanol ar yr hyn sy'n ddeddfwriaeth angenrheidiol a'r hyn nad yw'n ddeddfwriaeth angenrheidiol, ond mewn perthynas â'r gyllideb ar gyfer y cyfnod sydd i ddod, rydym wedi dyrannu £100 miliwn ychwanegol ar gyfer iechyd meddwl, a bydd rhywfaint o hwnnw'n ymgais i gryfhau ein dull ysgol gyfan o sicrhau bod plant a phobl ifanc yn cael y cymorth sydd ei angen arnynt cyn gynted â phosibl. Felly, mae iechyd meddwl yn flaenoriaeth bwysig i'r Llywodraeth hon, a byddwch yn gweld hynny'n cael ei adlewyrchu yn y gyllideb a gyhoeddwyd gennym cyn y Nadolig.
English: Minister, I don't think you need to take any lectures from the Tory party about wasting money; they are experts at doing so. But, Minister, as a young legislature, with around 50 Acts on the statute book, the Senedd is in a prime position to ensure that all its Acts are efficient, fit for purpose, and are achieving their proposed purpose. Can the Minister provide information about any recent post-implementation reviews of legislation, and whether the costs and savings predicted for those Acts were in fact accurate? Diolch yn fawr.
Welsh: Weinidog, nid wyf yn credu bod angen ichi wrando ar unrhyw bregethau gan y blaid Dorïaidd ynghylch gwastraffu arian; maent yn arbenigwyr ar wneud hynny. Ond Weinidog, fel deddfwrfa ifanc, gyda thua 50 o Ddeddfau ar y llyfr statud, mae'r Senedd mewn sefyllfa wych i sicrhau bod ei holl Ddeddfau yn effeithlon, yn addas i'r diben, ac yn cyflawni'r diben a fwriadwyd. A all y Gweinidog ddarparu gwybodaeth am unrhyw adolygiadau ôl-weithredu o ddeddfwriaeth yn ddiweddar, ac a oedd y costau a'r arbedion a ragwelwyd ar gyfer y Deddfau hynny yn gywir mewn gwirionedd? Diolch yn fawr.
English: Yes. So, those reviews will be the responsibility of each portfolio Minister, but I have some within my portfolio that will be relevant here. So, for example, I've just announced a review of the landfill disposals tax. That's set out in legislation, that there should be a review within five years of the implementation of the Act, so we are putting together, at the moment, the commission for that piece of work. I've liaised with the Chair of the Finance Committee in terms of the scope of that work, and we would be looking to do that over the period ahead, with a view to publication in the autumn of 2023. So, that is an example of where it's set out in legislation that we must undertake these reviews, and I intend to do so.
Welsh: Gallaf. Cyfrifoldeb pob Gweinidog portffolio fydd yr adolygiadau hynny, ond mae gennyf rai yn fy mhortffolio i a fydd yn berthnasol yma. Er enghraifft, rwyf newydd gyhoeddi adolygiad o'r dreth gwarediadau tirlenwi. Mae hynny wedi'i osod mewn deddfwriaeth, y dylid cynnal adolygiad o fewn pum mlynedd o weithrediad y Ddeddf, felly rydym yn sefydlu'r comisiwn ar gyfer y gwaith hwnnw ar hyn o bryd. Rwyf wedi cysylltu â Chadeirydd y Pwyllgor Cyllid ynghylch cwmpas y gwaith, a byddem yn ceisio gwneud hynny dros y cyfnod sydd i ddod, gyda'r bwriad o'i gyhoeddi yn hydref 2023. Felly, dyna enghraifft o ble y mae wedi'i nodi mewn deddfwriaeth fod yn rhaid inni gynnal yr adolygiadau hyn, ac rwy'n bwriadu gwneud hynny.