English: Right, well, I'll reiterate it, because I thought I had answered it very clearly. I have not seen any concrete evidence of why the business case is that they can't share masts, that they need to build their own separate infrastructure, and that that infrastructure is not viable without non-domestic rate relief. So, I have not yet seen that evidence, although we've asked for it many times. We are out to consultation. We've had the research; we are out to consultation on the back of that research. That consultation finishes in June, and we're about to start the permitted development rights. So, I think that is the answer that you've asked for. It might not be the one you like, but that is the answer. And the next answer on 5G - and I've said this many times in this Chamber - is that if we have the same situation as we have with 4G, where we have, effectively, landbanking, where you have one operator that owns 4G for Wales and if it doesn't think it's commercially viable, it simply doesn't roll it out, it is not acceptable. So, if they buy it and they haven't used it within a certain amount of time, we've asked the UK Government many times to put an axe on that to say, 'If you haven't used it in this specific area by then, give it back and let the public sector do it as a market intervention'. Now, that will reduce the amount of money that the spectrum is sold for, and that is a big issue because we don't think it should be used as a cash cow, and I'm afraid that's not what the UK Government thinks. So, we're having a big argument with them about that, which is a fundamental issue, because this is not a luxury product; it is an infrastructure. As long as we have that argument, we've got a real problem.
Welsh: Iawn, wel, fe wnaf ailadrodd, oherwydd roeddwn yn meddwl fy mod wedi ateb y cwestiwn yn glir. Nid wyf wedi gweld unrhyw dystiolaeth bendant i ddangos pam fod yr achos busnes yn dweud na allant rannu mastiau, fod angen adeiladu eu seilwaith eu hunain ar wahân, ac nad yw'r seilwaith hwnnw'n hyfyw heb ryddhad ardrethi annomestig. Felly, nid wyf wedi gweld y dystiolaeth honno eto, er ein bod wedi gofyn amdani sawl gwaith. Rydym yn ymgynghori. Rydym wedi cael y gwaith ymchwil; rydym yn ymgynghori ar sail y gwaith ymchwil hwnnw. Mae'r ymgynghoriad hwnnw'n dod i ben ym mis Mehefin, ac rydym ar fin dechrau'r hawliau datblygu a ganiateir. Felly, dyna'r ateb rydych wedi gofyn amdano, rwy'n credu. Mae'n bosibl nad dyna'r ateb y byddech yn ei hoffi, ond dyna'r ateb. A'r ateb nesaf ar 5G - ac rwyf wedi dweud hyn droeon yn y Siambr hon - os oes gennym yr un sefyllfa ag sydd gennym gyda 4G, lle mae gennym fancio tir i bob pwrpas, lle mae gennych un gweithredwr sy'n berchen ar 4G ar gyfer Cymru ac os nad yw'n credu ei fod yn hyfyw yn fasnachol, yn syml iawn ni chaiff ei gyflwyno, nid yw'n dderbyniol. Felly, os ydynt yn ei brynu ac os nad ydynt yn ei ddefnyddio o fewn cyfnod penodol o amser, rydym wedi gofyn i Lywodraeth y DU sawl gwaith i roi terfyn ar hynny a dweud, 'Os nad ydych wedi'i ddefnyddio yn yr ardal benodol hon erbyn hynny, dylech ei roi yn ôl a gadael i'r sector cyhoeddus ei wneud fel ymyrraeth yn y farchnad'. Nawr, bydd hynny'n lleihau'r swm o arian a geir am werthu'r sbectrwm, ac mae honno'n broblem fawr oherwydd nid ydym yn credu y dylid ei ddefnyddio fel ffynhonnell arian, ac rwy'n ofni nad yw Llywodraeth y DU yn credu hynny. Felly, rydym yn cael dadl fawr gyda hwy ynglŷn â hynny, ac mae'n fater sylfaenol, oherwydd nid moethusrwydd yw hwn; mae'n seilwaith. Cyhyd â'n bod yn parhau i gael y ddadl honno, mae gennym broblem go iawn.