English: May I say first of all that I identify entirely with the comments made by Dawn Bowden? It is hugely important that we do share our concerns and it's important that we express that emotion that we are bound to feel. That is so important at a time such as this. So, I thank you for sharing some of your concerns with us today, but we will get through this. We will get through this together - that is certainly possible. We, as a party, have been working constructively with the UK Government and the Welsh Government on this legislation in order to ensure that the Government does have the powers to keep us safe. This legislation should lead to more staff being available in the NHS and in social care. It should make volunteering easier, put a stop to groups of people getting together, enable more support to be provided to businesses and give dignity to those who lose loved ones. But, of course, as others have already said, it's important that these powers should only be used if entirely necessary, and we do need full scrutiny of the use of these powers, too. I do agree entirely with the concerns expressed on the two-year period, and my colleagues in Westminster have been calling for this six-monthly review. I do believe that assessing the impact of the powers contained within this Bill, the impacts on Wales - be they powers held here in Wales or powers that are not devolved to us as a Parliament - it is important that we assess the impact of any powers that come into force and, as Alun Davies said, there should be regular reports and opportunities here for us to scrutinise this in an entirely constructive manner in order to ensure that everything is working appropriately. It is important to note, I think, that the clauses in the Bill related to devolved issues do mean that the Welsh Government can decide not to make use of those clauses. That is to say that it could decide not to turn on the switch on those powers. I do think that that's important. It does show respect to our Senedd here. Just very briefly, some of the issues that do concern me. Social care: by relaxing the requirements on local government in terms of social care, there is a risk that this could lead to an unacceptable level of care, which could lead to unnecessary deaths. We do need to ensure that only if the pressures become extreme we would actually make use of those powers. On DBS checks, I agree entirely with the comments made by Suzy Davies. We do need to take care in hastening those checks in order to allow more volunteers to help, but we must also bear in mind what the purposes of those checks are, namely to safeguard the most vulnerable people and children amongst us. Now, with schools, I agree entirely that schools need to remain open, but it can place huge stress on teachers, and the teaching unions do have concerns about the health of their members although, of course, the provision for the children of key workers is entirely essential. On mental health, the Bill will allow far-reaching changes to mental health legislation, which could mean that people could be held in a unit or a hospital for a lot longer than they currently would be. To conclude, Deputy Presiding Officer: women. Women, generally speaking, care for children and older relatives and even to this day that hasn't changed. This unpaid work will increase over the next few weeks and months, and we do need to respect that work and that contribution. Women, including pregnant women and those on maternity leave shouldn't be placed at a disadvantage in their careers by following the guidance put down. You will know that our party has a long and honourable history of supporting and promoting the rights of our people but, temporarily, we do need this legislation. We have no option, and therefore we will not oppose the motion before us today. Thank you.
Welsh: Gaf i ddweud i ddechrau fy mod i'n uniaethu yn llwyr efo'r hyn ddywedodd Dawn Bowden? Mae'n bwysig ein bod ni yn rhannu ein gofidiau ac mae'n bwysig ein bod ni yn mynegi yr emosiwn rydyn ni yn teimlo. Mae hynny mor bwysig ar adeg fel hyn. Felly, dwi'n diolch i chi am rannu rhai o'ch gofidiau chi, ond mi wnawn ni ddod drwy hyn. Mi wnawn ni ddod drwy hyn efo'n gilydd - mae hynny yn bosibl. Rydyn ni fel plaid wedi bod yn gweithio yn adeiladol efo Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig a Llywodraeth Cymru ar y ddeddfwriaeth yma i sicrhau bod gan y Llywodraeth y pwerau i'n cadw ni'n saff. Mi ddylai'r ddeddfwriaeth yma arwain at fwy o staff yn y gwasanaeth iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol. Mi ddylai wneud gwirfoddoli yn haws, rhoi stop ar griwiau o bobl yn ymgynnull, galluogi mwy o gefnogaeth i fusnesau, a rhoi urddas i'r rhai fydd yn colli anwyliaid. Ond, wrth gwrs, fel mae eraill wedi dweud, mae'n bwysig mai dim ond os ydy hi'n hollol angenrheidiol y dylid defnyddio'r pwerau yma, ac mae angen craffu llawn hefyd ar y defnydd ohonynt. Mi rydw i'n cydfynd yn llwyr efo'r pryder ynglŷn â'r ddwy flynedd, ac mae fy nghydweithwyr i yn San Steffan wedi bod yn galw am yr adolygiad chwe mis yma. Dwi yn credu bod asesu effaith y pwerau sydd yn y mesur ar Gymru - boed nhw'n bwerau sydd gennym ni yma yng Nghymru neu'n bwerau sydd tu hwnt i'n gallu ni yma fel Senedd - mae'n bwysig i ni fod yn asesu effaith unrhyw bwerau ddaw i rym a bod yna, fel mae Alun Davies yn ei ddweud, adroddiadau cyson a chyfle i ni'n fan hyn i fod yn gallu craffu mewn ffordd hollol adeiladol i wneud yn siŵr bod popeth yn digwydd yn briodol. Mae'n bwysig nodi, dwi'n meddwl, bod y cymalau sydd yn y mesur sy'n ymwneud â materion datganoledig yn golygu y bydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn gallu penderfynu peidio â defnyddio'r cymalau am y materion datganoledig hynny. Hynny yw, penderfynu peidio rhoi switsh ymlaen, fel petai. Dwi yn meddwl bod hynna'n bwysig. Mae o'n dangos parch i'n Senedd ni fan hyn. Jest yn sydyn, rhai o'r materion sydd yn fy mhryderu i. Gofal cymdeithasol: drwy lacio'r gofynion ar lywodraeth leol o ran gofal cymdeithasol, mae perygl y bydd hyn yn arwain at lefel annerbyniol o ofal a allai arwain at farwolaethau diangen. Mae eisiau bod yn ofalus iawn mai dim ond os bydd y pwysau yn mynd yn hollol eithafol y byddwn ni'n defnyddio'r rheini. Gwiriadau DBS: dw'n cytuno'n llwyr efo beth roedd Suzy Davies yn ei ddweud. Mae angen gofal efo prysuro'r gwiriadau er mwyn galluogi mwy o wirfoddolwyr i helpu - dwi'n deall hynny'n iawn - ond mae'n rhaid i ni gofio beth ydy pwrpas y gwiriadau, sef amddiffyn y bobl a'r plant mwyaf bregus yn ein plith ni. Efo ysgolion, dwi'n cytuno, wrth gwrs, bod angen i ysgolion aros ar agor, ond mae o'n gallu rhoi straen mawr ar yr athrawon, ac mae gan yr undebau athrawon bryderon am iechyd eu haelodau nhw er, wrth gwrs, mae'r ddarpariaeth ar gyfer plant gweithwyr allweddol yn gwbl hanfodol. Iechyd meddwl: fe fydd y mesur yn caniatáu newidiadau pellgyrhaeddol i ddeddfwriaeth iechyd meddwl, a fydd yn gallu golygu bod pobl yn cael eu cadw mewn ysbyty neu sefydliad am gyfnodau llawer iawn hirach na'r presennol. I gloi, Dirprwy Lywydd: menywod. Menywod, merched sydd, ar y cyfan, yn gofalu am blant a pherthnasau hŷn hyd heddiw; dydy hynny ddim wedi newid. Mi fydd y gwaith di-dâl yma yn cynyddu yn ystod yr wythnosau a'r misoedd nesaf yma, ac mae angen parchu y gwaith yna. Dylai menywod, gan gynnwys y rhai sy'n feichiog ac ar absenoldeb mamolaeth ddim cael eu rhoi dan anfantais yn eu gyrfaoedd drwy ddilyn y canllawiau. Rydych chi'n gwybod bod gan ein plaid ni hanes hir ac anrhydeddus o gefnogi ac hyrwyddo hawliau ein pobl ni. Ond, dros dro, mae angen y ddeddfwriaeth yma. Does dim dewis, ac, felly, wrth gwrs, byddwn ni ddim yn gwrthwynebu'r cynnig sydd gerbron heddiw. Diolch.