techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you for that answer, Minister. What you've just then highlighted has been echoed around this Chamber by Members and by various committees of this Assembly. Clearly, the JMC is not working. It is very much dependent upon individuals within Westminster as to how they see it, and whether they want to see it work or not. There is no formal structure. There is no stature underpinning it. There was a JMC review, which was initiated by Westminster, but that's going over 12 months ago now, and we're still waiting for that outcome. Surely, it's time for us, with other nations in the UK, to actually start saying to UK Government, 'This structure must change. It must be underpinned by statute. We need to have a structure which treats each nation equally, each Government equally, within these discussions' and therefore it's underpinned to ensure that no one individual may decide whether it's a good thing or a bad thing.
Welsh: Diolch ichi am yr ateb hwnnw, Weinidog. Adleisiwyd yr hyn rydych newydd ei danlinellu o amgylch y Siambr hon gan Aelodau a phwyllgorau amrywiol y Cynulliad. Yn amlwg, nid yw'r Cyd-bwyllgor Gweinidogion yn gweithio. Mae'n dibynnu'n fawr ar sut y mae unigolion yn San Steffan yn ei weld, ac a ydynt am ei weld yn gweithio ai peidio. Nid oes strwythur ffurfiol. Nid oes unrhyw statws yn sail iddo. Cafwyd adolygiad o'r Cyd-bwyllgor Gweinidogion, a gychwynnwyd gan San Steffan, ond mae dros 12 mis ers hynny bellach, ac rydym yn dal i ddisgwyl ei ganlyniad. Yn sicr, mae'n bryd i ni, gyda gwledydd eraill y DU, ddechrau dweud wrth Lywodraeth y DU, 'Rhaid i'r strwythur hwn newid. Rhaid iddo fod yn seiliedig ar statud. Mae angen i ni gael strwythur sy'n trin pob gwlad yn gyfartal, a phob Llywodraeth yn gyfartal, o fewn y trafodaethau hyn' ac felly fe'i tanategir er mwyn sicrhau na all unrhyw unigolyn benderfynu a yw'n beth da neu'n beth drwg.
English: It is crucially important, I think, that the JMC structure is strengthened for the future, and I also feel that we should reform the committee, and place it on a statutory level, to ensure that the Welsh voice is clearly heard in any future discussions. I think that, in response to the Member for Aberavon, you said that you don't favour placing the JMC on a statutory level. Could you explain why that's the case? Because I do believe that that's the way forward.
Welsh: Mae yn hynod o bwysig, dwi'n credu, bod strwythur Cyd-bwyllgor y Gweinidogion yn cael ei gryfhau yn y dyfodol, a dwi hefyd yn credu y dylem ni ddiwygio'r pwyllgor, a gosod y pwyllgor ar lefel statudol, i sicrhau bod llais Cymru yn glir mewn unrhyw drafodaethau yn y dyfodol. Dwi'n credu, mewn ateb i'r Aelod dros Aberafan, eich bod chi wedi dweud dŷch chi ddim yn ffafrio rhoi'r pwyllgor ar lefel statudol. Allwch chi esbonio i ni pam dŷch chi ddim yn ffafrio hynny? Oherwydd dyna'r ffordd ymlaen, yn fy marn i.
English: I thank the Member for the question, and for the opportunity to respond to that specific point. It's not a matter of not favouring that - that would certainly be an advantage. What I'm saying is that that isn't a panacea for having a system that truly supports our work here in Wales and across the UK.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn, a'r cyfle i ateb y pwynt penodol hwnnw. Nid cwestiwn o ddim ffafrio hynny yw hyn - buasai hynny yn fantais. Yr hyn rwy'n ei ddweud yw nid panacea yw hynny am gael system o weithredu sydd, a dweud y gwir, yn cefnogi'n gwaith ni yma yng Nghymru ac ar draws y Deyrnas Unedig.
English: I continue to have regular discussions with the UK Government on a number of Brexit-related issues. I met the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union most recently in Cardiff on 16 May, and a meeting of the Joint Ministerial Committee on EU negotiations is scheduled for the end of this month.
Welsh: Rwy'n parhau i gael trafodaethau rheolaidd gyda Llywodraeth y DU ar nifer o faterion yn ymwneud â Brexit. Cefais gyfarfod â'r Ysgrifennydd Gwladol dros Adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd yn fwyaf diweddar yng Nghaerdydd ar 16 Mai, ac mae cyfarfod o'r Cyd-bwyllgor Gweinidogion ar negodiadau'r UE wedi'i drefnu ar gyfer diwedd y mis hwn.
English: Counsel General, thank you for that answer. There is a growing fear that the national health service is going to become the sacrificial lamb on the altar of a 'no deal' Brexit. When Donald Trump said that the NHS would be a service that would be part of a UK-US trade deal, when Theresa May stood next to him and refused to deny that, when the US have refused to change their negotiating objectives, which include all services as part of a deal, where we have a situation where international trade deals that could override and implement measures in devolved areas without the consent of this place, when the health Minister wrote a year or so ago to Theresa May asking for assurances and guarantees about the protection of the NHS, which she refused to give, and in a situation where we have a potential new Tory First Minister in support of privatisation of the national health service and a supine trade deal with the US, what steps is the Welsh Government taking to protect the national health service from a 'no deal' Brexit?
Welsh: Gwnsler Cyffredinol, diolch ichi am yr ateb hwnnw. Mae ofn cynyddol fod y gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol yn mynd i fod yn aberth ar allor Brexit 'dim bargen'. Pan ddywedodd Donald Trump y byddai'r GIG yn wasanaeth a fyddai'n rhan o gytundeb masnach rhwng y DU a'r UDA, pan safai Theresa May yn ei ymyl a gwrthod gwadu hynny, pan fo'r UDA wedi gwrthod newid eu hamcanion negodi, sy'n cynnwys yr holl wasanaethau fel rhan o gytundeb, pan fo gennym sefyllfa lle mae cytundebau masnach ryngwladol a allai ddiystyru a gweithredu mesurau mewn meysydd datganoledig heb ganiatâd y lle hwn, pan fo'r Gweinidog iechyd wedi ysgrifennu at Theresa May flwyddyn neu ddwy yn ôl yn gofyn am sicrwydd a gwarantau ynghylch amddiffyn y GIG, rhywbeth y gwrthododd eu rhoi, ac mewn sefyllfa pan fo gennym Brif Weinidog Torïaidd newydd posibl sy'n cefnogi preifateiddio'r gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol a chytundeb masnach unochrog gyda'r UDA, pa gamau y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn eu cymryd i ddiogelu'r gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol rhag Brexit 'dim bargen'?
English: The most recent Brexit discussion with the UK Government has of course been around the First Minister's use, or non-use, of a Foreign Office car in Brussels today. However, on the NHS issue, it is not commercially traded. Surely, when something is a public service, it is not something that is part of a trade deal in the way that is suggested. Of course, if you have public procurement, you will want to procure cheaply and effectively and get good value, and if you enter into a contract with an overseas provider, it is quite reasonable that that contract should be respected and that should be insured either through the British courts or through investor dispute resolution. Is that not all that we're talking about here?
Welsh: Wrth gwrs roedd y drafodaeth Brexit ddiweddaraf gyda Llywodraeth y DU yn ymwneud â defnydd, neu ddiffyg defnydd, y Prif Weinidog o gar y Swyddfa Dramor ym Mrwsel heddiw. Fodd bynnag, ar fater y GIG, ni chaiff ei fasnachu. Pan fydd rhywbeth yn wasanaeth cyhoeddus, nid yw'n rhywbeth sy'n rhan o gytundeb masnach yn y ffordd a awgrymir. Wrth gwrs, os oes gennych gaffael cyhoeddus, fe fyddwch am gaffael yn rhad ac yn effeithiol a chael gwerth da, ac os ymrwymwch i gontract gyda darparwr tramor, mae'n eithaf rhesymol disgwyl i'r contract hwnnw gael ei barchu ac y dylid ei yswirio naill ai drwy lysoedd Prydain neu drwy drefn ddatrys anghydfod i fuddsoddwyr. Onid dyna'r cwbl sydd dan sylw yma?
English: I have absolutely no confidence in the commitment of the Brexit Party to the NHS. The leader of the party has been absolutely categorical that he does not believe in a publicly funded NHS and believes in an insurance system. So, the Member will have to forgive me if I take that with a pinch of salt. [ Interruption. ]
Welsh: Nid oes gennyf hyder o gwbl yn ymrwymiad Plaid Brexit i'r GIG. Mae arweinydd y blaid wedi bod yn gwbl bendant nad yw'n credu mewn GIG a ariennir yn gyhoeddus ac mae'n credu mewn system yswiriant. Felly, bydd yn rhaid i'r Aelod faddau imi os cymeraf hynny â phinsiad o halen. [ Torri ar draws. ]
English: I'm grateful to you, Presiding Officer. Minister, you, like me, will have seen the rather astonishing press reports this morning that the First Minister has not been provided with diplomatic support during his visit in Brussels. Now, like yourself and myself - we've both enjoyed the support of the diplomatic service of the United Kingdom, and I remember negotiating and discussing with David Lidington and William Hague and others how that can be strengthened. Whilst Ministers here are not Ministers of the United Kingdom Government, they are United Kingdom Ministers, and in Brussels, we are part of the United Kingdom ministerial team, and we have agreements with the United Kingdom Government that we do enjoy the support of the United Kingdom Representation to the European Union and of the foreign office. I would place on record my gratitude to UKRep and to civil servants in the foreign office for the excellent support that I received, both within the European Union and elsewhere, whilst travelling as a representative of the Welsh Government. Will you then take up this issue with David Lidington when you meet him later this week, and say to him that we expect all our Ministers to be treated with the respect that the electoral mandate gives them, and that we are here to represent the Government here and the people of Wales, and we are not expected to ask permission from any member of the UK Government as to how we do that?
Welsh: Rwy'n ddiolchgar ichi, Lywydd. Weinidog, fe fyddwch chi, fel finnau, wedi gweld adroddiadau rhyfeddol braidd yn y wasg y bore yma na ddarparwyd cymorth diplomyddol ar gyfer y Prif Weinidog yn ystod ei ymweliad â Brwsel. Nawr, fel chi a fi - rydym ein dau wedi mwynhau cymorth gwasanaeth diplomyddol y Deyrnas Unedig, ac rwy'n cofio trafod a negodi gyda David Lidington a William Hague ac eraill sut y gellir cryfhau hynny. Er nad yw Gweinidogion yn y fan hon yn Weinidogion Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig, Gweinidogion y Deyrnas Unedig ydynt, ac ym Mrwsel, rydym yn rhan o dîm gweinidogol y Deyrnas Unedig, ac mae gennym gytundebau â Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig sy'n dynodi ein bod yn cael cymorth Cynrychiolaeth y Deyrnas Unedig i'r Undeb Ewropeaidd a'r swyddfa dramor. Hoffwn gofnodi fy niolch i UKRep ac i weision sifil yn y swyddfa dramor am y gefnogaeth ardderchog a gefais, o fewn yr Undeb Ewropeaidd ac mewn mannau eraill, wrth deithio fel cynrychiolydd ar ran Llywodraeth Cymru. A wnewch chi godi'r mater hwn gyda David Lidington pan fyddwch yn ei gyfarfod yn ddiweddarach yr wythnos hon, a dweud wrtho ein bod yn disgwyl i'n holl Weinidogion gael eu trin â'r parch a roddir iddynt gan y mandad etholiadol, a'n bod yma i gynrychioli'r Llywodraeth yma a'r Cymry, ac nid oes disgwyl inni ofyn caniatâd unrhyw aelod o Lywodraeth y DU ynglŷn â sut y gwnawn hynny?
English: I thank the Member for his question. As he indicates in it, our relationship with the UK Representation to the EU is very good, so we were particularly puzzled and disappointed, if I can put it like that, by the unprecedented decision that the Foreign and Commonwealth Office appear to have taken. I should say, as context, that we have been provided as a Welsh Government with high-quality support by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office on every previous occasion when Ministers have visited Brussels, as he himself in the question indicates. I can confirm that the FCO informed the Government that they'd only provide support while the First Minister was in Brussels today, including access to the car pool service, if we gave assurances that the First Minister would not undermine UK Government policy. We made it clear that the First Minister and Welsh Ministers take seriously, in their capacity as Ministers of the United Kingdom, their duties to the United Kingdom when abroad on official business, but that is not out of deference to the UK Government and it certainly isn't in consideration of getting access to car services. So, we refused to give any assurance that would fetter or inhibit the entitlement of the First Minister to speak up for Wales's national interest. Ultimately, as it happened, car facilities were then offered, but the First Minister is travelling using public transport throughout his visit to Brussels today.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am ei gwestiwn. Fel y mae'n nodi ynddo, mae ein perthynas â Chynrychiolaeth y DU i'r UE yn dda iawn, felly roedd y penderfyniad digynsail yr ymddengys bod y Swyddfa Dramor a Chymanwlad wedi'i wneud yn peri penbleth a siom i ni, os caf ei roi felly. Fel cyd-destun, dylwn ddweud ein bod wedi cael cymorth o ansawdd uchel gan y Swyddfa Dramor a Chymanwlad fel Llywodraeth Cymru ar bob achlysur blaenorol pan fu Gweinidogion yn ymweld â Brwsel, fel y nododd yn y cwestiwn. Gallaf gadarnhau bod y Swyddfa Dramor a Chymanwlad wedi hysbysu'r Llywodraeth na fyddent yn darparu cymorth tra oedd y Prif Weinidog ym Mrwsel heddiw, gan gynnwys defnydd o'r gwasanaeth ceir, oni bai ein bod yn rhoi sicrwydd na fyddai'r Prif Weinidog yn tanseilio polisi Llywodraeth y DU. Gwnaethom yn glir fod y Prif Weinidog a Gweinidogion Cymru o ddifrif ynglŷn â'u dyletswyddau, yn rhinwedd eu swydd fel Gweinidogion y Deyrnas Unedig, i'r Deyrnas Unedig pan fyddant dramor ar fusnes swyddogol, ond nid yw hynny'n golygu eu bod yn ymostyngol i Lywodraeth y DU ac yn sicr nid yw cael defnydd o wasanaethau ceir yn rhan o'r ystyriaeth. Felly, fe wnaethom wrthod rhoi unrhyw sicrwydd a fyddai'n llyffetheirio neu'n llesteirio hawl y Prif Weinidog i siarad dros fuddiannau cenedlaethol Cymru. Yn y pen draw, fel y digwyddodd, fe gynigiwyd cyfleusterau ceir wedyn, ond mae'r Prif Weinidog yn teithio gan ddefnyddio trafnidiaeth gyhoeddus drwy gydol ei ymweliad â Brwsel heddiw.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. Will the Minister make a statement on the Welsh Government's strategy for its discussions with the European Commission today?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. A wnaiff y Gweinidog ddatganiad am strategaeth Llywodraeth Cymru ar gyfer ei thrafodaethau â'r Comisiwn Ewropeaidd heddiw?
English: At the moment, we are anticipating the change of Commission personnel in future. The First Minister is today in Brussels planning to meet with a number of our partners there, including Michel Barnier.
Welsh: Ar hyn o bryd, rydym yn rhagweld newid personél y Comisiwn yn y dyfodol. Mae'r Prif Weinidog ym Mrwsel heddiw gyda'r bwriad o gyfarfod â nifer o'n partneriaid yno, gan gynnwys Michel Barnier.
English: Thank you for that answer. I have to say I do find it astonishing that Welsh Labour Ministers seem to be more interested in chauffeur-driven cars than they do in the real issue of the day. I am sure that the Welsh Government would not want to allow its resources to be used to support activities that undermine its policy objectives either, and I think Ministers frankly should grow up and listen up to the people of Wales who voted to leave the EU in 2016. You didn't refer in your answer then to the negotiating strategy that the First Minister may or may not be employing in Brussels today. But will you tell us whether he will be reiterating the will of the people of Wales, who voted to leave the EU in 2016, and if not, why not?
Welsh: Diolch ichi am yr ateb hwnnw. Mae'n rhaid imi ddweud fy mod yn rhyfeddu ei bod yn ymddangos bod gan Weinidogion Llafur Cymru fwy o ddiddordeb mewn ceir sy'n cael eu gyrru gan chaffeurs nag sydd ganddynt mewn materion go iawn. Rwy'n siŵr na fyddai Llywodraeth Cymru am ganiatáu i'w hadnoddau gael eu defnyddio i gefnogi gweithgareddau sy'n tanseilio ei hamcanion polisi hithau chwaith, ac a dweud y gwir rwy'n credu y dylai Gweinidogion dyfu fyny a gwrando ar bobl Cymru a bleidleisiodd dros adael yr UE yn 2016. Ni chyfeirioch chi yn eich ateb yn awr at y strategaeth negodi y gallai'r Prif Weinidog fod yn ei defnyddio, neu beidio, ym Mrwsel heddiw. Ond a wnewch chi ddweud wrthym a fydd yn ailadrodd ewyllys pobl Cymru a bleidleisiodd dros adael yr UE yn 2016, ac os na fydd, pam ddim?
English: I think that's a curious question from the Member. I had finished my answer to the previous question by saying that the First Minister was using public transport in Brussels today, which seems to me to indicate a complete lack of interest in the use of Government cars. So, I think he should reflect on the fact that the First Minister is in Brussels dealing with matters of substance rather than matters of presentation and headlines as his question suggests. The First Minister will be describing what is in the best interests of Wales and the position of the Welsh Government on behalf of the people of Wales in his discussions in Europe, as he does at every other opportunity.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu bod hwnnw'n gwestiwn rhyfedd gan yr Aelod. Gorffennais fy ateb i'r cwestiwn blaenorol drwy ddweud bod y Prif Weinidog yn defnyddio trafnidiaeth gyhoeddus ym Mrwsel heddiw, sydd i'w weld i mi yn dynodi diffyg diddordeb llwyr yn y defnydd o geir y Llywodraeth. Felly, credaf y dylai ystyried y ffaith bod y Prif Weinidog ym Mrwsel yn ymdrin â materion o sylwedd yn hytrach na materion yn ymwneud â chyflwyniad a phenawdau fel y mae ei gwestiwn yn awgrymu. Bydd y Prif Weinidog yn disgrifio beth sydd er lles gorau Cymru a safbwynt Llywodraeth Cymru ar ran pobl Cymru yn ei drafodaethau yn Ewrop, fel y mae'n gwneud ar bob cyfle arall.
English: Isn't the reality, Minister, that you're still playing politics with Brexit? There was a clear manifesto commitment from the Labour Party in 2017 to deliver Brexit and it's quite clear now to the people of Wales that Labour cannot be trusted to deliver on that particular manifesto commitment. Now, you've already done a u-turn in terms of your position on a second referendum, and you've said that there needs to be an option to remain on a ballot paper in a future referendum. But the reality is, of course, that the one thing that the people of Wales didn't vote for is any kind or version of 'remain'. You keep going on about kinds or versions of 'leave', but one thing that the people of Wales did not endorse - and absolutely did not endorse - was any kind of remaining in the European Union. How can you justify ignoring the outcome of the 2016 referendum, which rejected 'remain' on the ballot paper, and what guarantees can you give to the people of Wales that if there is a second referendum - and I very much hope that there will not be - that you won't ignore that one either?
Welsh: Onid y gwir amdani, Weinidog, yw eich bod yn dal i chwarae gwleidyddiaeth â Brexit? Cafwyd ymrwymiad maniffesto clir gan y Blaid Lafur yn 2017 i gyflawni Brexit ac mae'n eithaf clir yn awr i bobl Cymru na ellir ymddiried yn y Blaid Lafur i gyflawni'r ymrwymiad maniffesto penodol hwnnw. Nawr, rydych eisoes wedi gwneud tro pedol o ran eich safbwynt ar ail refferendwm, ac rydych wedi dweud bod angen opsiwn i aros ar bapur pleidleisio mewn refferendwm yn y dyfodol. Ond y gwir amdani, wrth gwrs, yw mai'r un peth na phleidleisiodd pobl Cymru drosto yw unrhyw fath neu fersiwn o 'aros'. Rydych yn dal i siarad am fathau neu fersiynau o 'adael', ond yr un peth nad oedd pobl Cymru'n ei gymeradwyo - ac nid oeddem yn ei gymeradwyo o gwbl - oedd unrhyw fath o aros yn yr Undeb Ewropeaidd. Sut y gallwch gyfiawnhau anwybyddu canlyniad refferendwm 2016, a wrthododd 'aros' ar y papur pleidleisio, a pha sicrwydd y gallwch ei roi i bobl Cymru, os bydd ail refferendwm - ac rwy'n mawr obeithio na fydd - na fyddwch yn anwybyddu hwnnw chwaith?
English: There are very few things, If I may say, that I admire about the Conservative Party, but his ability to chastise me for playing politics with a straight face, having asked the two questions he's just asked, is really quite admirable in its own way. On the question of a referendum, I do not recall at any point hearing anybody advocate for a 'no deal' Brexit in 2016. Quite the opposite - everybody was telling us how straightforward it would be, how people would be falling over to reach terms with us. The Prime Minister, Theresa May, has completely failed to live up to those promises made. We are now facing a situation where there is absolutely no mandate for a 'no deal' Brexit, which seems to be where the Conservative Party is careering us towards with the stampede of support like panicked bisons from the Conservative benches in Parliament towards Boris Johnson, who could joyfully be taking us towards a 'no deal' Brexit. In that situation, there is only one way that we can prevent the damage that that would cause to Wales and that is by putting the question back to the people, which is fundamentally a democratic principle.
Welsh: Os caf ddweud, prin iawn yw'r pethau rwy'n eu hedmygu am y Blaid Geidwadol, ond mae ei gallu i fy ngheryddu am chwarae gwleidyddiaeth gydag wyneb syth, ar ôl gofyn y ddau gwestiwn y mae newydd eu gofyn, yn eithaf clodwiw yn ei ffordd ei hun. Ar gwestiwn refferendwm, nid wyf yn cofio clywed neb ar unrhyw adeg yn dadlau dros Brexit 'dim bargen' yn 2016. I'r gwrthwyneb yn llwyr - roedd pawb yn dweud wrthym pa mor syml y byddai, sut y byddai pobl yn baglu dros ei gilydd i drafod telerau gyda ni. Mae'r Prif Weinidog, Theresa May, wedi methu'n llwyr â chyflawni'r addewidion a wnaethpwyd. Rydym bellach yn wynebu sefyllfa lle nad oes mandad o gwbl ar gyfer Brexit 'dim bargen', sef yr hyn yr ymddengys y mae'r Blaid Geidwadol yn carlamu tuag ato yn debyg i ruthr o gefnogaeth fel bustych ofnus oddi ar feinciau'r Ceidwadwyr yn y Senedd i Boris Johnson, a allai ein hebrwng yn llawen tuag at Brexit 'dim bargen'. Yn y sefyllfa honno, nid oes ond un ffordd y gallwn atal y niwed y byddai hynny'n ei achosi i Gymru, sef drwy roi'r cwestiwn yn ôl i'r bobl, sy'n egwyddor ddemocrataidd sylfaenol.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. Minister, Donald Trump has said that he'd want the NHS to be on the table in any future UK-US trade deal negotiations. He later rowed back on this, but the fact that his ambassador to the UK, Woody Johnson, has also said the same thing indicates clearly what US priorities will be if and when trade negotiations begin. The Welsh Government's international relations Minister has said that there is no prospect whatsoever of the Welsh NHS being sold off in this way and the health Minister said that the Welsh NHS would not be up for sale. And you've spoken today already in answer to Mick Antoniw about workforce planning and the need to work with the NHS. While I applaud your passion in favour of keeping NHS services publicly run and free at the point of need, can you explain to me exactly - and I would press you on this - what steps Welsh Government could take to prevent the Welsh NHS from being sold off if the Westminster Government were to trade it away during negotiations with the US?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Weinidog, mae Donald Trump wedi dweud y byddai am i'r GIG fod ar y bwrdd mewn unrhyw drafodaethau yn y dyfodol ynglŷn â chytundeb masnach rhwng y DU a'r UDA. Yn ddiweddarach, fe dynnodd yn ôl ar hyn, ond mae'r ffaith bod ei lysgennad i'r DU, Woody Johnson, hefyd wedi dweud yr un peth yn dangos yn glir beth fydd blaenoriaethau'r UDA os a phan fydd trafodaethau masnach yn dechrau. Mae Gweinidog cysylltiadau rhyngwladol Llywodraeth Cymru wedi dweud nad oes perygl o gwbl y caiff y GIG yng Nghymru ei werthu yn y ffordd hon a dywedodd y Gweinidog iechyd na fyddai GIG Cymru ar werth. Ac rydych chi wedi siarad heddiw eisoes yn eich ateb i Mick Antoniw am gynllunio'r gweithlu a'r angen i weithio gyda'r GIG. Er fy mod yn cymeradwyo eich angerdd o blaid cadw gwasanaethau'r GIG yn gyhoeddus ac yn rhad ac am ddim lle mae eu hangen, a allwch egluro wrthyf - ac rwy'n pwyso arnoch i wneud hyn - pa gamau'n hollol y gallai Llywodraeth Cymru eu cymryd i atal GIG Cymru rhag cael ei werthu pe bai Llywodraeth San Steffan yn ei fasnachu'n rhan o negodiadau gyda'r UDA?