English: I thank the Member for those detailed questions. I'll do my best to answer as many as I can. Mr Isherwood referred to a duty on UK Ministers to report regularly to the UK Parliament on progress in relation to frameworks. I believe that is likely to be on a three-monthly basis. We were keen on that because it puts real pressure into the system to reach agreements quickly on those matters. That report will be shared with the Assembly, as Mark Isherwood said. I repeat my commitment to continuing to engage with the Scottish Government and the UK Government on outstanding matters, as the Scottish Government sees it, within this agreement. I spoke to Michael Russell, the Scottish Minister, last week and earlier this week. We commit ourselves to continued work on the issues that the Scottish Government has identified, and if anything can be done to improve the agreement in a way that would allow the Scottish Government to sign up to it and is acceptable to other parties, then we will work right up to the last minute to try to bring that about, and that's why we will go to the JMC again next week, with Scotland and the UK Government, to track progress on that. Mark Isherwood asked me how likely I thought it was that there wouldn't be agreement in relation to the matters that are to be placed in the freezer. I think that is very unlikely, because, as Members will have seen in an annex to the inter-governmental agreement, we set out the 24 areas that all three Governments are agreed are potentially subject to framework agreements, and there are two other matters - state aid and food geographical indications - that remain the subject of continued discussion between the administrations. On the Supreme Court, as you will see, this is a reciprocal agreement that we have come to. The Attorney-General, if and when a legislative consent motion is passed on the floor of this Assembly, will go to the Supreme Court and seek to withdraw the reference that has been made there. We will then come forward with proposals to the National Assembly that would lead to the proposition being placed on the floor here, but the Law Derived from the European Union (Wales) Bill, as it still is, would be repealed. You cannot repeal a Bill that has not yet received the Royal Assent. This Bill is yet to be in that position, and the timings of matters are therefore dependent on that course of action. But we will come forward once the Attorney-General has taken the actions he has committed to taking, and put that proposition before this National Assembly for its determination.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiynau manwl hynny. Fe wnaf fy ngorau i ateb cynifer ag sy'n bosibl. Cyfeiriodd Mr Isherwood at ddyletswydd ar Weinidogion y DU i adrodd yn rheolaidd wrth Senedd y DU ar gynnydd mewn perthynas â fframweithiau. Credaf fod hynny'n debygol o fod ar sail bob tri mis. Roeddem yn awyddus i weld hynny oherwydd mae'n rhoi pwysau gwirioneddol yn y system i gyrraedd cytundeb yn gyflym ar y materion hynny. Caiff yr adroddiad hwnnw ei rannu gyda'r Cynulliad, fel y dywedodd Mark Isherwood. Rwy'n ailadrodd fy ymrwymiad i barhau i ymgysylltu â Llywodraeth yr Alban a Llywodraeth y DU ar faterion heb eu datrys, fel y mae Llywodraeth yr Alban yn ei weld, o fewn y cytundeb hwn. Siaradais â Michael Russell, Gweinidog yr Alban, yr wythnos diwethaf ac yn gynharach yr wythnos hon. Rydym yn ymrwymo i barhau i weithio ar y materion a nodwyd gan Lywodraeth yr Alban, ac os gellir gwneud unrhyw beth i wella'r cytundeb mewn ffordd a fyddai'n caniatáu i Lywodraeth yr Alban ei gefnogi ac sy'n dderbyniol i bartïon eraill, byddwn yn gweithio hyd at y funud olaf i geisio sicrhau hynny, a dyna pam y byddwn yn mynd i gyfarfod o Gyd-bwyllgor y Gweinidogion eto yr wythnos nesaf, gyda'r Alban a Llywodraeth y DU, i olrhain cynnydd ar hynny. Gofynnodd Mark Isherwood i mi pa mor debygol oedd hi, yn fy marn i, na cheid cytundeb mewn perthynas â'r materion sydd i'w rhoi yn y rhewgell. Credaf fod hynny'n annhebygol iawn, oherwydd, fel y bydd yr Aelodau wedi gweld mewn atodiad i'r cytundeb rhynglywodraethol, rydym yn nodi 24 maes y cytuna pob un o'r tair Llywodraeth y gallent fod yn amodol ar gytundebau fframwaith, a cheir dau fater arall - cymorth gwladwriaethol a dynodiad daearyddol bwyd - sy'n dal i fod yn destun trafodaethau parhaus rhwng y gweinyddiaethau. Ar y Goruchaf Lys, fel y gwelwch, rydym wedi dod i gytundeb dwyochrog. Os a phan y caiff cynnig cydsyniad deddfwriaethol ei basio ar lawr y Cynulliad hwn, bydd y Twrnai Cyffredinol yn mynd i'r Goruchaf Lys i geisio diddymu'r cyfeiriad a wnaed yno. Byddwn wedyn yn cyflwyno cynigion i'r Cynulliad Cenedlaethol a fyddai'n arwain at y cynnig yn cael ei roi ar y llawr yma, ond byddai'r Bil Cyfraith sy'n Deillio o'r Undeb Ewropeaidd (Cymru), fel y mae o hyd, yn cael ei ddiddymu. Ni allwch ddiddymu Bil nad yw eto wedi cael Cydsyniad Brenhinol. Mae'r Bil hwn eto i fod yn y sefyllfa honno, ac mae amseriad pethau'n dibynnu ar y llwybr gweithredu hwnnw. Ond pan fydd y Twrnai Cyffredinol wedi gweithredu fel y mae wedi ymrwymo i weithredu, byddwn yn rhoi'r cynnig hwnnw gerbron y Cynulliad Cenedlaethol hwn iddo allu penderfynu yn ei gylch.