techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Minister, I know you recently met with the Industrial Communities Alliance to discuss their concerns about the shared prosperity and levelling-up funds, funds that are so important to the economic future of constituencies like mine, the Cynon Valley. The ICA have long argued that any funding from the schemes must be both long term and sustainable if it is to deliver transformative change. Would you agree with me that this is a clear message that needs to be sent from this Senedd and listened to by the UK Ministers? And furthermore, Minister, would you agree with me that it is a very worrying signal that local government has been deleted from the title of the UK Government department that is now responsible for levelling up?
Welsh: Gweinidog, gwn i chi gyfarfod â'r Gynghrair Cymunedau Diwydiannol yn ddiweddar i drafod eu pryderon am y cronfeydd ffyniant a rennir a'r cronfeydd codi'r gwastad, arian sydd mor bwysig i ddyfodol economaidd etholaethau fel fy un i, Cwm Cynon. Mae'r ICA wedi dadlau ers tro bod yn rhaid i unrhyw gyllid o'r cynlluniau fod yn hirdymor ac yn gynaliadwy os yw am sicrhau newid trawsnewidiol. A fyddech chi'n cytuno â mi fod hon yn neges glir mae angen i'r Senedd hon ei hanfon a bod angen i Weinidogion y DU wrando arni? At hynny, Gweinidog, a fyddech chi'n cytuno â mi ei bod yn arwydd pryderus iawn bod llywodraeth leol wedi'i dileu o deitl adran Llywodraeth y DU sydd bellach yn gyfrifol am godi'r gwastad?
English: It's odd about how long a departmental title is, and Michael Gove's LUHC department isn't one that I think will be judged on its title, but what it's actually prepared to do. I do know that Welsh local government has felt excluded from the process of even the engagement that took place up to this point in time, and that in itself is not at all helpful. The requests for meetings with Luke Hall when he was the then Minister before being removed at the last UK reshuffle were not ones that any local authority in Wales would say worked well, and also the way that evidence was given to the Welsh Affairs Select Committee, which, of course, is led by a Conservative Member of Parliament, with a majority of Conservative MPs - they have recognised an amount of incoherence in the previous approach. So, I am concerned about how the headlines about local authorities having a better deal because they're going to directly engage at this point in time are really trying to hide the fact there's less money, less capacity and less say over what to do. I do take seriously the Industrial Communities Alliance and what they've had to say to me. Their work with counterparts in England and across Wales is something that I want to keep on engaging with and listening to to try to make sure that we can have a framework that will work for Wales and, indeed, other parts of the UK in making sure we really do see significant benefit spread to communities that really need it.
Welsh: Mae'n rhyfedd pa mor hir yw teitl adrannol, ac nid yw adran LUHC Michael Gove yn un yr wyf yn credu y caiff ei barnu ar ei theitl, ond yr hyn mae'n barod i'w wneud mewn gwirionedd. Gwn fod llywodraeth leol yng Nghymru wedi teimlo ei bod wedi'i heithrio o'r broses o hyd yn oed yr ymgysylltu a ddigwyddodd hyd at y pwynt hwn mewn amser, ac nad yw ynddo'i hun yn ddefnyddiol o gwbl. Nid oedd y ceisiadau am gyfarfodydd gyda Luke Hall pan oedd yn Weinidog ar y pryd cyn cael ei dynnu allan yn ad-drefniad diwethaf y DU yn rhai y byddai unrhyw awdurdod lleol yng Nghymru yn dweud eu bod yn gweithio'n dda, a hefyd y ffordd y rhoddwyd tystiolaeth i'r Pwyllgor Dethol ar Faterion Cymreig, sydd, wrth gwrs, yn cael ei arwain gan Aelod Seneddol Ceidwadol, gyda mwyafrif o ASau Ceidwadol - maen nhw wedi cydnabod cryn anghydweld yn y dull blaenorol. Felly, rwyf yn pryderu am y ffordd mae'r penawdau am awdurdodau lleol yn cael gwell bargen gan eu bod yn mynd i ymgysylltu'n uniongyrchol ar y pwynt hwn yn ceisio cuddio'r ffaith bod llai o arian, llai o gapasiti a llai o lais ynghylch beth i'w wneud. Rwyf yn cymryd o ddifrif y Gynghrair Cymunedau Diwydiannol a'r hyn maen nhw wedi gorfod ei ddweud wrthyf. Mae eu gwaith gyda chymheiriaid yng Nghymru a Lloegr yn rhywbeth yr wyf am barhau i ymgysylltu ag ef a gwrando arno i geisio sicrhau y gallwn ni gael fframwaith a fydd yn gweithio i Gymru ac, yn wir, rhannau eraill o'r DU i sicrhau ein bod mewn gwirionedd yn gweld budd sylweddol yn lledaenu i gymunedau sydd wir ei angen.
English: Minister, would you agree that this is another kind of chumocracy, which is a characteristic of this Conservative Government, where they try and retain wealth among their privileged friends whilst denying the poorest areas of the UK funding that they so badly need? How else can you explain why Gwynedd is at the bottom of level 3 and an area such as the Chancellor's is in the highest level for funding? As a former county councillor, I was part of the local campaign to try to get projects for this funding, and it was incredible to see the mess in terms of finding projects. The levelling-up fund looks at spending on schemes that will allow Tory MPs to be re-elected and get good salaries whilst this cruel Government in London is cutting universal credit to the most vulnerable in society. Westminster isn't levelling up, but rather it is punching down. Minister, would you agree with that analysis?
Welsh: Weinidog, fyddech chi'n cytuno bod hwn yn fath arall o chumocracy sydd yn nodwedd o'r Llywodraeth Geidwadol yma efo nhw'n trio ceisio cadw cyfoeth ymhlith eu cyfeillion breintiedig nhw tra'n gwadu ardaloedd tlotaf y Deyrnas Gyfunol o arian sydd yn angenrheidiol? Sut arall mae esbonio sut mae Gwynedd ar waelod haen 3 ac ardal fel ardal y Canghellor yn cael yr haen uchaf o bres? Fel cynghorydd sir cynt, roeddwn i'n rhan o'r broses leol o geisio canfod projectau ar gyfer yr arian yma ac roedd e'n anghredadwy y fath o lanast oedd yno er mwyn trio ffeindio'r gwahanol brojectau er mwyn cyfiawnhau hyn. Mae'r levelling-up fund yn edrych i wario pres ar gynlluniau fydd yn cynorthwyo Aelodau Seneddol Torïaidd i gael eu hail-ethol ac ennill cyflogau bras tra, ar y llaw arall, mae'r Llywodraeth giaidd yma yn Llundain yn cwtogi pres credyd cynhwysol i'r bobl fwyaf bregus. Nid lefelu i fyny mae San Steffan yn ei wneud, ond yn hytrach pwnsio i lawr. Ydych chi, Weinidog, yn cytuno efo'r dadansoddiad yma?
English: I think there are significant flaws in the way that the current process has worked, and it's certainly not a process that this Government supports at all. And I recognise what the Member says about where Gwynedd is, and also I see a Member representing the county of Bridgend who will also know about the exclusion of areas of Wales that are objectively less well-off than parts of England that have been put into priority areas. Now, that just isn't levelling up. On any analysis, you can't say that is a levelling-up approach. And for me the challenge is whether we'll get some unity in this place, not just to support the Government but to support the country and to recognise that, actually, this is about Wales and whether we're going to be treated fairly and properly. And I would say to Conservative Members, there is something here about the mandate you have in this place from people and whether you're prepared to stand up for Wales on something where, transparently, the current approach does not work for Wales, or whether you'll go in to bat for Ministers in Whitehall. And I would ask you to think again about the approach you take and to take a constructive approach with us to try to generate the best possible deal for Wales rather than the significant funding cut we are already receiving within this year.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu bod diffygion sylweddol yn y ffordd mae'r broses bresennol wedi gweithio, ac yn sicr nid yw'n broses mae'r Llywodraeth hon yn ei chefnogi o gwbl. Ac rwy'n cydnabod yr hyn mae'r Aelod yn ei ddweud am ble mae Gwynedd, a hefyd rwy'n gweld Aelod yn cynrychioli sir Pen-y-bont ar Ogwr a fydd hefyd yn gwybod am eithrio ardaloedd o Gymru sydd, yn wrthrychol, yn llai cefnog na rhannau o Loegr sydd wedi'u rhoi mewn meysydd blaenoriaeth. Nawr, nid yw hynny'n gyfystyr â chodi'r gwastad. O ran unrhyw ddadansoddiad, ni allwch ddweud bod hynny'n ddull codi'r gwastad. Ac i mi, yr her yw p'un a gawn ni rywfaint o undod yn y lle hwn, nid yn unig i gefnogi'r Llywodraeth ond i gefnogi'r wlad ac i gydnabod bod hyn, mewn gwirionedd, yn ymwneud â Chymru a p'un a fyddwn yn cael ein trin yn deg ac yn briodol. A byddwn yn dweud wrth Aelodau Ceidwadol, mae rhywbeth yma am y mandad sydd gennych yn y lle hwn gan bobl a p'un a ydych yn barod i sefyll dros Gymru ar rywbeth lle nad yw'r dull presennol, yn dryloyw, yn gweithio i Gymru, neu a fyddwch yn mynd i mewn i fatio i weinidogion yn Whitehall. A byddwn i'n gofyn i chi feddwl eto am y dull yr ydych chi'n ei gymryd ac i fabwysiadu ymagwedd adeiladol gyda ni i geisio creu'r fargen orau bosibl i Gymru yn hytrach na'r toriad sylweddol mewn cyllid yr ydym eisoes yn ei gael yn ystod eleni.
English: Dirprwy Lywydd, I declare my interest as a former chair of the regional investment for Wales steering group and as the current chair of the strategic forum for regional investment in Wales, both non-remunerated. That's taken a minute, Chair, to actually say that. Could I say, I was actually heartened by Paul Davies's comments about the 20 years of experience of delivering investment? But, of course, that investment is actually delivered not simply by Welsh Government but also by those partners and the Welsh European Funding Office, with their European experience of actually co-ordinating payments as well, and it's these same partners that have actually raised the issues of a lack of strategic planning in this competitive bidding process, the sector funding gaps, the duplication, the service continuity, the dismantling of services that are currently going ahead. It is those people with 20 years' experience of actually delivering on the ground who are saying, 'We've got some issues coming up.' It is those same partners, Minister, and Paul and others, who equally stand ready to help the UK Government, as well as the Welsh Government, to put in place that funding, delivered through a Welsh policy context, delivered through, actually, co-operation and co-ordination on the ground to achieve meeting the needs, rather than a competitive bidding process, and they stand ready to help, they really do. I stand ready as former chair and now chair of the forum going forward to meet with Michael Gove and to speak with him and to say, 'We can assist you in this.' It's not about badging it -
Welsh: Dirprwy Lywydd, rwy'n datgan fy niddordeb fel cyn gadeirydd grŵp llywio'r buddsoddiad rhanbarthol i Gymru ac fel cadeirydd presennol y fforwm strategol ar gyfer buddsoddi rhanbarthol yng Nghymru, y ddau heb dâl. Mae hynny wedi cymryd munud, Gadeirydd, i ddweud hynny. A gaf i ddweud, roeddwn i'n teimlo'n galonogol mewn gwirionedd o glywed sylwadau Paul Davies am yr 20 mlynedd o brofiad o gyflawni buddsoddiad? Ond, wrth gwrs, mae'r buddsoddiad hwnnw'n cael ei ddarparu nid yn unig gan Lywodraeth Cymru ond hefyd gan y partneriaid hynny a Swyddfa Cyllid Ewropeaidd Cymru, gyda'u profiad Ewropeaidd o gydlynu taliadau hefyd, a'r un partneriaid sydd wedi codi'r materion sy'n ymwneud â diffyg cynllunio strategol yn y broses ymgeisio gystadleuol hon, bylchau cyllid y sector, dyblygu, parhad y gwasanaeth, datgymalu gwasanaethau sy'n mynd rhagddynt ar hyn o bryd. Y bobl hynny sydd ag 20 mlynedd o brofiad o gyflawni ar lawr gwlad sy'n dweud, 'Mae gennym rai materion ar droed.' Yr un partneriaid, Gweinidog, a Paul ac eraill, sydd yr un mor barod i helpu Llywodraeth y DU, yn ogystal â Llywodraeth Cymru, i sefydlu'r cyllid hwnnw, a ddarperir drwy gyd-destun polisi Cymru, a gyflwynir drwy, mewn gwirionedd, gydweithredu a chydlynu ar lawr gwlad i ddiwallu'r anghenion, yn hytrach na phroses ymgeisio gystadleuol, ac maen nhw'n barod i helpu, maen nhw wirioneddol yn barod. Rwyf yn barod fel cyn-gadeirydd ac yn awr fel cadeirydd y fforwm wrth symud ymlaen i gyfarfod â Michael Gove ac i siarad ag ef a dweud, 'Gallwn eich cynorthwyo yn hyn.' Nid yw'n ymwneud â'i labelu -
English: I've given the Member extra time; ask the question.
Welsh: Rwyf wedi rhoi amser ychwanegol i'r Aelod; gofynnwch y cwestiwn.
English: Thank you. My apologies, Dirprwy Lywydd. It isn't about badging it either 'UK' or 'Wales'; it's about delivering for the people who we are sent here to represent, and there is a better way to do it than this. We can help. Would you take that message forward?
Welsh: Diolch. Rwy'n ymddiheuro, Dirprwy Lywydd. Nid yw'n ymwneud â'i labelu naill ai'n 'DU' neu 'Cymru'; mae'n ymwneud â chyflawni dros y bobl yr ydym ni wedi ein hanfon yma i'w cynrychioli, ac mae ffordd well o wneud hynny na hyn. Gallwn ni helpu. Fyddech chi cystal â mynd â'r neges honno ymlaen?
English: That is the message that we have tried to offer on a number of occasions and, to date, we have not had prompt or timely replies from the previous ministerial team. And I do hope that, with a new Secretary of State, there will be an opportunity to reset what we are able to do. And the point the Member makes about other partners is well put and, in many respects, those partners are trying to say, 'Look, we don't want to get involved in disagreements between the two Governments, but we do want to know what the rules are and we want to know we're not going to be excluded.' For example, higher and further education, in the last six years of European programmes, £405 million, they spent. At present, with the current design, they wouldn't get anything. For the private sector, £272 million in the last six years, and the third sector £113 million. At the moment, there's no route for them to have any access under the current design of the programme, and that just doesn't make sense, as well as the points I made earlier about undermining apprenticeships, Business Wales and the development bank. So, there is an opportunity to reset and to come up with a much better answer and deliver much better outcomes for the people we are here to represent.
Welsh: Dyna'r neges yr ydym ni wedi ceisio'i chynnig droeon ac, hyd yma, nid ydym wedi cael atebion prydlon nac amserol gan y tîm gweinidogol blaenorol. Ac rwy'n gobeithio, gydag Ysgrifennydd Gwladol newydd, y bydd cyfle i ailosod yr hyn y gallwn ei wneud. Ac mae'r pwynt mae'r Aelod yn ei wneud am bartneriaid eraill wedi'i roi'n dda ac, ar lawer ystyr, mae'r partneriaid hynny'n ceisio dweud, 'Edrychwch, nid ydym am gymryd rhan mewn anghytundebau rhwng y ddwy Lywodraeth, ond rydym am wybod beth yw'r rheolau ac rydym am wybod na fyddwn yn cael ein heithrio.' Er enghraifft, addysg uwch ac addysg bellach, yn ystod chwe blynedd olaf rhaglenni Ewropeaidd, fe wnaethon nhw wario £405 miliwn. Ar hyn o bryd, gyda'r dyluniad presennol, ni fydden nhw'n cael unrhyw beth. Ar gyfer y sector preifat, £272 miliwn yn ystod y chwe blynedd diwethaf, a £113 miliwn i'r trydydd sector. Ar hyn o bryd, nid oes llwybr iddyn nhw gael unrhyw fynediad o dan ddyluniad presennol y rhaglen, ac nid yw hynny'n gwneud synnwyr, yn ogystal â'r pwyntiau a wnes i'n gynharach ynghylch tanseilio prentisiaethau, Busnes Cymru a'r banc datblygu. Felly, mae cyfle i ailosod a meddwl am ateb llawer gwell a sicrhau canlyniadau llawer gwell i'r bobl yr ydym yma i'w cynrychioli.
English: Well, 'Not a penny worse off' is echoing rather emptily around this devolved Chamber. Two months after the UK Government stated that projects that had been approved would be announced, there has been silence. And, as you rightly point out, Minister, the local authority area of Caerphilly is excluded from the priority funding list, in favour - in favour - of richer English areas, even though the communities of Islwyn have some deep areas of deprivation - Objective 1, Objective 2, Objective 3. I could go on on the Welsh index of multiple deprivation indices. Once again, despite devolution, on the outside of Tory Britain looking in. Minister, so far, all that I can see that has been achieved is a Tory rebrand, the renaming of the UK's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to the totally laughable Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, and accompanied, as we said, with the sacking of the lead Minister Robert Jenrick, to be replaced with Michael Gove - an interesting choice. Minister, what representations will the Welsh Government make to the newly empowered UK Minister to get the communities of Islwyn included and not excluded in the UK Government's priority funding list? And will the Minister also invite Michael Gove - in his new clothes, and preferably not invisible - to come to Islwyn and see for himself the very real need that is prevalent in my community and which he now in Whitehall has the power to end?
Welsh: Wel, mae 'Dim ceiniog yn waeth ei byd' yn adleisio braidd yn wag o amgylch y Siambr ddatganoledig hon. Ddeufis wedi i Lywodraeth y DU ddweud y byddai prosiectau oedd wedi'u cymeradwyo yn cael eu cyhoeddi, bu distawrwydd. Ac, fel y gwnaethoch chi ei ddweud yn gywir, Gweinidog, mae ardal awdurdod lleol Caerffili wedi'i heithrio o'r rhestr ariannu â blaenoriaeth, o blaid - o blaid - ardaloedd cyfoethocach yn Lloegr, er bod gan gymunedau Islwyn rai ardaloedd dwfn o amddifadedd - Amcan 1, Amcan 2, Amcan 3. Gallwn fynd ymlaen ar fynegai Cymru o amddifadedd lluosog. Unwaith eto, er gwaethaf datganoli, ar y tu allan i Brydain Dorïaidd yn edrych i mewn. Gweinidog, hyd yn hyn, y cyfan y gallaf ei weld sydd wedi'i gyflawni yw ailfrandio'r Torïaid, ailenwi Gweinyddiaeth Dai, Cymunedau a Llywodraeth Leol y DU i'r Adran Codi'r Gwastad, Tai a Chymunedau cwbl chwerthinllyd, a diswyddo'r Gweinidog Arweiniol Robert Jenrick, gyda Michael Gove yn cymryd ei le - dewis diddorol. Gweinidog, pa sylwadau fydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn eu cyflwyno i Weinidog newydd y DU i gynnwys cymunedau Islwyn ac i beidio â'u heithrio yn rhestr ariannu blaenoriaethau Llywodraeth y DU? Ac a wnaiff y Gweinidog hefyd wahodd Michael Gove - yn ei ddillad newydd, ac nid yn anweledig os oes modd - i ddod i Islwyn a gweld drosto'i hun yr angen gwirioneddol sy'n gyffredin yn fy nghymuned ac y mae ganddo bellach yn Whitehall y pŵer i roi terfyn arno?
English: And finally, Mark Isherwood, who I know will keep within the minute.
Welsh: Ac yn olaf, Mark Isherwood, ac rwy'n gwybod y bydd yn cadw at y funud.
English: I'll do my best. Diolch. Wales only continued to be eligible for European structural funding because, despite billions in subsequent rounds, it failed to close the prosperity gap it was intended for, unlike other nations that entered the project at the same time, like Poland, which of course did and excluded themselves. You say Flintshire excluded itself from the priority funding list. Do you therefore recognise that the structural funds programme in Wales was focused on west Wales and the Valleys and prioritised 15 counties, but Flintshire and Wrexham were outside those? And how, finally, do you respond to the charities and community-interest organisations in Flintshire that told me this summer that they contacted Welsh Government officials asking if Flintshire could be added to the levelling-up fund list - your officials made enquiries and came back confirming that they could and, of course, they've now been included in the bids?
Welsh: Fe wnaf i fy ngorau. Diolch. Yr unig reswm y parhaodd Cymru i fod yn gymwys ar gyfer cyllid strwythurol Ewropeaidd, er gwaethaf biliynau mewn rowndiau dilynol, oedd oherwydd iddi fethu â chau'r bwlch ffyniant yr oedd wedi bwriadu ei wneud, yn wahanol i wledydd eraill a ymunodd â'r prosiect ar yr un pryd, fel Gwlad Pwyl, a wnaeth hynny wrth gwrs, ac eithrio ei hun. Rydych chi'n dweud bod sir y Fflint wedi eithrio ei hun o'r rhestr blaenoriaeth cyllid. A ydych chi felly, yn cydnabod bod y rhaglen cronfeydd strwythurol yng Nghymru yn canolbwyntio ar orllewin Cymru a'r Cymoedd ac yn blaenoriaethu 15 sir, ond roedd sir y Fflint a Wrecsam y tu allan iddyn nhw? Ac yn olaf, sut ydych chi'n ymateb i'r elusennau a'r sefydliadau buddiannau cymunedol yn sir y Fflint a ddywedodd wrthyf i yr haf hwn eu bod nhw wedi cysylltu â swyddogion Llywodraeth Cymru yn gofyn a ellid ychwanegu sir y Fflint at restr cronfa codi'r gwastad - gwnaeth eich swyddogion ymholiadau a dod yn ôl yn cadarnhau y gellid ac, wrth gwrs, maen nhw wedi eu cynnwys yn y ceisiadau erbyn hyn?
English: I think the Member will find that, if you compare the county of Flintshire to areas of England that are included, you'll find there is a significant disparity in wealth and opportunity, and it does not make sense that Flintshire is not included in the priority areas when more wealthy and prosperous areas of England are. If he wants to make an alternative case and celebrate the fact that Flintshire is excluded, that's a matter for him. I'd also point out that, when it comes to the outcomes that we've achieved with European funds, there are significant outcomes in terms of the jobs, the outcomes of jobs that have been saved and created, and I'm proud of what we've done and the lessons that we've learned - a point that his colleague Paul Davies made. There are lots of lessons we have learned that are being ignored in the current approach. And it's about learning lessons here, the choices we make in this Government, it's about learning lessons in the previous approach to austerity and the damage that caused in terms of our economic future as well, and trying to do the right thing now for the people that we're here to represent. And I would welcome a constructive approach from the UK Government and indeed from Conservative Members in this institution as well. I look forward of course, Deputy Llywydd, to reporting back on those matters as we make, I hope, some progress for the benefit of the people of Wales.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu y bydd yr Aelod yn gweld, os byddwch chi'n cymharu sir y Fflint ag ardaloedd o Loegr sydd wedi eu cynnwys, fe welwch chi fod gwahaniaeth sylweddol mewn cyfoeth a chyfle, ac nid yw'n gwneud synnwyr nad yw sir y Fflint wedi ei chynnwys yn yr ardaloedd blaenoriaeth pan fo ardaloedd mwy cyfoethog a llewyrchus yn Lloegr wedi eu cynnwys. Os yw'n dymuno cyflwyno achos amgen a dathlu'r ffaith bod sir y Fflint wedi ei heithrio, mater iddo ef yw hynny. Hoffwn i dynnu sylw hefyd at y ffaith, o ran y canlyniadau yr ydym ni wedi eu cyflawni gyda chronfeydd Ewropeaidd, fod canlyniadau sylweddol o ran y swyddi, canlyniadau swyddi sydd wedi eu hachub a'u creu, ac rwy'n falch o'r hyn yr ydym ni wedi ei wneud a'r gwersi yr ydym ni wedi eu dysgu - pwynt a wnaeth ei gyd-Aelod Paul Davies. Mae llawer o wersi yr ydym ni wedi eu dysgu yn cael eu hanwybyddu yn y dull gweithredu presennol. Ac mae'n ymwneud â dysgu gwersi yma, y dewisiadau yr ydym ni'n eu gwneud yn y Llywodraeth hon, mae'n ymwneud â dysgu gwersi yn y dull blaenorol o ymdrin â chyni a'r niwed yr achosodd hynny o ran ein dyfodol economaidd hefyd, a cheisio gwneud y peth iawn nawr ar gyfer y bobl yr ydym ni yma i'w cynrychioli. A byddwn i'n croesawu dull gweithredu adeiladol gan Lywodraeth y DU ac yn wir gan Aelodau Ceidwadol yn y sefydliad hwn hefyd. Edrychaf ymlaen, wrth gwrs, Dirprwy Lywydd, at adrodd yn ôl ar y materion hynny wrth i ni wneud, gobeithio, rywfaint o gynnydd er budd pobl Cymru.
English: The next item is item 5 - the legislative consent motion on the Environment Bill. I call on the Minister for Climate Change to move the motion. Julie James.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf, eitem 5 - cynnig cydsyniad deddfwriaethol ar Fil yr Amgylchedd. Galwaf ar y Gweinidog Newid Hinsawdd i wneud y cynnig. Julie James.