techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Welcome back, then, to the Finance Committee at the Senedd, and I'm very pleased to welcome the Minister for Finance and Trefnydd, Rebecca Evans, for an evidence session on the second supplementary budget for 2020-21. Joining her are Andrew Jeffreys, who's a director of the Treasury, and Matthew Denham-Jones, deputy director of the financial controls division. A warm welcome to the three of you. I'll start with my first question, if I may, at the outset. Of course, the Welsh Government wouldn't publish a second supplementary budget until February. We understand that we're in an unprecedented period. So, Minister, could you please outline what you hope to achieve by publishing this supplementary budget at this time?
Welsh: Croeso nôl, felly, i Bwyllgor Cyllid Senedd Cymru, a dwi'n falch i groesawu atom ni y Gweinidog Cyllid a'r Trefnydd, Rebecca Evans, ar gyfer sesiwn dystiolaeth ar ail gyllideb atodol Llywodraeth Cymru ar gyfer 2020-21. Yn ymuno â hi mae Andrew Jeffreys, sy'n gyfarwyddwr y Trysorlys, a Matthew Denham-Jones, dirprwy gyfarwyddwr yr is-adran rheolaeth ariannol. Croeso cynnes i'r tri ohonoch chi atom ni. Gwnaf i gychwyn gyda fy nghwestiwn i, os caf i, ar y dechrau fan hyn. Wrth gwrs, fyddai Llywodraeth Cymru ddim fel arfer yn cyhoeddi cyllideb atodol, neu'r ail gyllideb atodol tan fis Chwefror. Mae rhywun yn deall ein bod ni mewn cyfnod digynsail. Efallai y gallwch chi, Weinidog, sôn ychydig ynglŷn â beth ŷch chi'n gobeithio ei gyflawni drwy gyhoeddi'r gyllideb atodol hon ar hyn o bryd.
English: Thank you, Chair. Could I just return to the questions about test, trace and protect? There's £45 million for contact tracing in the budget. What will that deliver, and how will the funding be allocated to health boards and local authorities? And could you also talk about the element of safeguarding or shielding? Is that reflected in this budget - the money that's given for that specific element of test, trace and protect?
Welsh: Diolch, Cadeirydd. Gaf i jest mynd yn ôl at gwestiynau ynglŷn â phrofi, olrhain a diogelu? Mae yna £45 miliwn ar gyfer olrhain cysylltiadau yn y gyllideb. Beth fydd hynny'n ei gyflawni, a sut bydd y cyllid yn cael ei ddyrannu i fyrddau iechyd ac awdurdodau lleol? A hefyd, fedrwch chi jest sôn wrthym ni am yr elfen ddiogelu? Ydy honno'n cael ei hadlewyrchu yn y gyllideb yma - yr arian sy'n cael ei roi ar gyfer yr elfen benodol yna o'r strategaeth profi, olrhain a diogelu?
English: Just in terms of clarity, does the 'protect' element include people who are self-isolating and the additional funding for that?
Welsh: Jest o ran eglurder, felly, ydy'r diogelu yma'n cynnwys pobl sydd yn hunan-ynysu a'r arian ychwanegol ar gyfer hynny?
English: Okay. And, Chair, if I may ask on one further issue in terms of the testing: there is no additional allocation for expanding testing through the public side in this budget.
Welsh: Iawn. A jest, Cadeirydd, os gallaf i ofyn un mater arall o ran y profi: felly does yna ddim dyraniad ychwanegol ar gyfer ehangu profi drwy'r ochr gyhoeddus yn y gyllideb hon.
English: So, that suggests that you're not moving away from the Lighthouse regime and that you're going to be earmarking the funding for what you intended to do from the outset even though, perhaps, the Lighthouse regime is not working. I would have expected to have seen some change in the allocations here because there's additional pressure to move towards a public service for this testing.
Welsh: Felly, mae hynny'n awgrymu nad ydych chi ddim yn symud i ffwrdd oddi wrth y gyfundrefn Lighthouse a'ch bod chi'n mynd i fod yn neilltuo'r arian ar gyfer yr hyn roeddech chi'n bwriadu ei wneud o'r cychwyn, er efallai nad ydy'r gyfundrefn Lighthouse ddim yn gweithio. Buaswn i wedi disgwyl gweld ychydig o newid yn y dyraniadau yn fan hyn oherwydd bod yna bwysau ychwanegol i symud tuag at wasanaeth cyhoeddus ar gyfer y profi.
English: Thank you very much. A question about the decommissioning of the field hospitals: will the costs be met from the £166 million that's allocated in the first supplementary budget?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Cwestiwn ynglŷn â dad-gomisiynu'r ysbytai maes: fydd y costau yma'n cael eu talu allan o'r £166 miliwn sy'n cael ei ddyrannu yn y gyllideb atodol gyntaf?
English: And in terms of the opening of the Grange university hospital, the early opening, is it the Welsh Government who will be paying the additional costs in terms of resource and capital?
Welsh: Ac o ran agor ysbyty athrofaol y Faenor yn gynnar, ai Llywodraeth Cymru fydd yn talu'r costau ychwanegol o ran adnoddau a chyfalaf?
English: Thank you for that clarity for the record. This budget allocates more than £300 million more to the local authority hardship fund, and that includes £264 million for additional costs and loss of income. What exactly do you mean by that, and how will that funding be used?
Welsh: Iawn. Diolch am yr eglurder yna ar gyfer y record. Mae'r gyllideb yma yn dyrannu dros £300 miliwn yn fwy i'r gronfa caledi awdurdodau lleol, ac mae hyn yn cynnwys £264 miliwn ar gyfer costau ychwanegol a cholli incwm. Beth yn union ydych chi'n ei olygu efo hwnna? Sut fydd yr arian yma yn cael ei ddefnyddio?
English: And finally from me, a question about reserves held by local authorities: do you expect local authorities to use those reserves, even though some have much more than others in their reserves?
Welsh: Ac yn olaf gen i, cwestiwn ynglŷn â chronfeydd wrth gefn yr awdurdodau lleol: ydych chi yn disgwyl i awdurdodau lleol fynd i mewn i'r cronfeydd hynny, er bod yna rai efo llawer iawn mwy na'i gilydd yn y cronfeydd wrth gefn?
English: We've discussed the shared prosperity fund, but just to focus on the point about the need for a legal basis for a fund of this kind and how concerned you are if that legal basis is not available. Maybe some people would argue that we don't need that and that a successor scheme could be formed without a legal basis, but I am very doubtful about that. But I'd like to have your view on that.
Welsh: Rydyn ni wedi trafod ychydig bach am y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin, ond jest i hoelio'r pwynt ynglŷn â'r angen am sail gyfreithiol ar gyfer cronfa o'r math yna a pha mor bryderus ydych chi os nad ydy'r sail gyfreithiol yna ar gael. Byddai rhai'n dadlau, efallai, nad oes dim o'i angen o ac y byddai yna gronfa olynol yn gallu cael ei ffurfio heb angen am y sail gyfreithiol, ond dwi'n amheus iawn o hynny. Ond hoffwn i gael eich barn chi ar hynny.
English: Therefore, I propose in accordance with Standing Order 17.42 (ix) that the committee resolves to exclude the public from the remainder of the meeting. Are Members content? Okay. Thank you very much. We will therefore go into private session.
Welsh: Felly dwi'n cynnig yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 17.42 (ix) fod y pwyllgor yn penderfynu gwahardd y cyhoedd o weddill y cyfarfod yma. Ydy Aelodau'n hapus? Iawn. Diolch yn fawr. Mi awn ni felly i mewn i sesiwn breifat.
English: Thank you very much, Chair, and good morning, Counsel General. If I could turn to look specifically at the details of the UK Government amendments, you will know that this committee does look at the minutiae in these issues. Could I ask you what you as a Welsh Government think of the UK Government's amendments to the Bill that were tabled during the passage of the Bill through the House of Commons, and looking specifically at clause 3 on the manner of sale requirements, clause 16 (6) on the scope of the regulatory requirements that could fall within Part 2, and also Schedule 3 and amendments to Part 4 and the office for the internal market task group? So, it's those three specific UK Government amendments that we're looking at. What's your view of them as Welsh Government?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Cadeirydd, a bore da, Cwnsler Cyffredinol. A throi yn benodol i feddwl am fanylion gwelliannau Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig, rŷch chi'n gwybod yn y pwyllgor yma dŷn ni'n manylu dros bethau fel hyn. Allaf i ofyn ichi beth ydych chi'n meddwl, fel Llywodraeth Cymru nawr, am welliannau Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig y gwnaethon nhw eu gosod yn ystod taith y Bil drwy Dŷ'r Cyffredin, ac yn benodol cymal 3, sydd yn gofyn gofynion dull gweithredu, hynny yw, y manner of sale requirements; cymal 16 (6) ar gwmpas y gofynion rheoliadol a allai ddod o fewn Rhan 2; a hefyd Atodlen 3 o welliannau i Ran 4 a'r grŵp gorchwyl swyddfa'r farchnad fewnol - y tri gwelliant penodol yna o ochr Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig? Beth ydych chi'n ei feddwl ohonyn nhw fel Llywodraeth Cymru?
English: Generally speaking, if you look at the scope of the Bill and the list of concerns that we as a Government have, which are shared by others, the UK Government's amendments are peripheral to those concerns. I will just tell you, broadly speaking, what the response is to those three points, as you asked specifically. In terms of clause 3, I understand that the intention is to ensure that things such as minimum alcohol unit pricing don't fall within the compass of the principles. But, in reality, it doesn't safeguard any future changes to that, so if any future Government in Wales would wish to make changes to that, then those wouldn't have been safeguarded by those amendments. In terms of clause 16, this, in reality, means that even if you have regulations in force now that aren't changed in future in Wales, but similar regulations in other parts of the UK are amended, it wouldn't be possible to require people to comply with Welsh regulations in future, which clearly is a cause of concern. Then, in terms of the Schedule that you mentioned, there is an effort here to deal with one of the concerns that we do have, namely that the Competition and Markets Authority and office for the internal market should be accountable to the devolved Governments, but it doesn't go far enough at all. Our amendments are far more substantial than the amendments put forward by the UK Government.
Welsh: Ar y cyfan, os ŷch chi'n edrych ar sgôp y Bil a'r rhestr o bryderon sydd gyda ni fel Llywodraeth sy'n cael eu rhannu gan eraill, mae'r gwelliannau mae Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Gyfunol wedi dod ymlaen â nhw, a dweud y gwir, yn ymylol i'r rhestr hwnnw o bryderon. Gwnaf i jest ddweud yn fras beth yw'r ymateb i'r tri phwynt yna, gan eich bod chi wedi gofyn yn benodol. O ran cymal 3, rwy'n deall mai'r bwriad yw sicrhau nad yw pethau fel minimum alcohol unit pricing yn dod o fewn cwmpas yr egwyddorion. A dweud y gwir, dyw e ddim yn diogelu newidiadau yn y dyfodol i hynny, felly os bydd unrhyw Lywodraeth yn y dyfodol yng Nghymru eisiau gwneud newidiadau i hynny, dyw'r rheini ddim yn cael eu diogelu gan y gwelliannau. O ran cymal 16, mae hyn, a dweud y gwir, yn golygu, hyd yn oed os oes gyda chi'r rheoliadau mewn grym nawr a dŷn nhw ddim yn cael eu newid yn y dyfodol - hynny yw, yng Nghymru - a bod rheoliadau cyffelyb mewn rhannau eraill o'r Deyrnas Gyfunol yn cael eu newid, fyddai e ddim yn bosibl gorfodi pobl i gyd-fynd â rheoliadau Cymru yn y dyfodol, sydd yn amlwg yn peri pryder. Wedyn, o ran yr Atodlen, mae yna ymgais yma, rwy'n credu, i ddelio ag un o'r pryderon sydd gyda ni - hynny yw, bod y CMA a'r OIM yn atebol i'r Llywodraethau datganoledig - ond dyw e ddim yn mynd yn ddigon pell o gwbl. Mae ein gwelliannau ni yn llawer mwy sylweddol na'r gwelliannau sydd wedi cael eu cynnig gan Lywodraeth y Deyrnas Gyfunol.
English: Thank you for that. That was very clear. But further to that, can you give us a view on when the Welsh Government plans to table a supplementary legislative consent memorandum to reflect the amendments made by the UK Government? When do you intend to lay that supplementary LCM before the Senedd?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr am hynna. Mae hynna'n glir iawn. Allech chi ymhellach roi syniad i ni o bryd mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn bwriadu gosod memorandwm cydsyniad deddfwriaethol atodol i adlewyrchu'r gwelliannau y mae Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig wedi'u gwneud? Pryd ydych chi'n bwriadu gosod memorandwm cydsyniad deddfwriaethol atodol o'n blaenau ni yn y Senedd?
English: Well, we hope that there will be further amendments to the Bill following consideration in the House of Lords, so I think it makes sense to wait until the content of the Bill is more settled than it is now. But I would appreciate the committee's view on that in due course.
Welsh: Rŷn ni'n gobeithio, wrth gwrs, y bydd mwy o welliannau yn dod yn sgil cysidro Tŷ'r Arglwyddi, felly rwy'n credu ei fod e'n gwneud synnwyr i aros tan fod cynnwys y Bil wedi setlo ychydig mwy nag yw e nawr. Ond byddwn i'n gwerthfawrogi barn y pwyllgor ar hynny maes o law.
English: Thank you for that - very clear, once again. The final question from me is in terms of the more general approach you're taking to the internal market Bill. The Welsh Government written briefing on this Bill provided to this committee states that the Bill as drafted, 'is not necessary, and is a solution in search of a problem'. I'm quoting your words there. So, taking all of that into account, can you explain why the Welsh Government is seeking to amend the Bill rather than to oppose it outright?
Welsh: Diolch am hynna - clir iawn, eto. Mae fy nghwestiwn olaf i ynglŷn â'r ffordd fwy cyffredinol yr ydych chi'n ymdrin â Bil y farchnad fewnol fel Llywodraeth Cymru. Wrth gwrs, mae'r papur briffio ysgrifenedig, fel Llywodraeth, ar y Bil yma sydd wedi cael ei ddarparu i'r pwyllgor yma yn nodi nad yw'r Bil fel y cafodd ei ddrafftio yn angenrheidiol o gwbl a'i fod yn ddatrysiad sy'n chwilio am broblem. Dwi'n dyfynnu'ch geiriau chi yn fanna. Felly, o gymryd hynna, allwch chi felly egluro pam mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn ceisio diwygio'r Bil yn hytrach na'i wrthwynebu?
English: Just to be clear, we do oppose the Bill. We're saying that it's unnecessary, and we believe in and support the principle of a strong internal market across the UK that would safeguard the interests of the people of Wales and Welsh business, but this isn't the way to ensure we achieve that. But the political and legislative fact of the matter is that the UK Government has brought the Bill before the Parliament in Westminster. That has happened, and so the question for us as a Government is how we respond to that. There's no point pretending it hasn't happened. So, we have two choices. One is to engage and to try and amend the Bill, although we don't believe it's necessary, and the second approach is to not do that. The Scottish Government is in a similar position, although they don't agree with the principle of the Bill. We need to ensure that we can achieve amendments to the Bill, if possible, because, if it is enacted, we need to reduce the negative impact of the Bill, and the Act as it will be at that point.
Welsh: Jest i fod yn glir, rŷn ni yn gwrthwynebu'r Bil. Rŷn ni'n dweud nad oes angen am y Bil. Rŷn ni'n credu yn, ac yn arddel, yr egwyddor o farchnad fewnol gref ar draws y Deyrnas Gyfunol sydd â buddiannau pobl Cymru a busnesau Cymru yn sicr, ond nid dyma'r ffordd i sefydlu a sicrhau hynny. Ond y ffaith wleidyddol, ddeddfwriaethol yw bod Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Gyfunol wedi dod â'r Mesur o flaen y Senedd yn San Steffan. Felly, mae hynny wedi digwydd, a'r cwestiwn i ni fel Llywodraeth yw'r ffordd rŷn ni'n ymateb i hynny. Does dim pwynt esgus nad yw e wedi digwydd. Felly, mae gyda ni ddau ddewis: un yw i ymwneud â'r Bil a cheisio ei wella fe, er nad ŷm ni'n credu bod angen am y Bil; a'r ail yw i beidio gwneud hynny. Wel, rwy'n credu bod Llywodraeth yr Alban mewn lle tebyg, er nad ydyn nhw'n cytuno ag egwyddor y Bil. Mae angen sicrhau ein bod ni'n cael gwelliannau i'r Bil, os gallwn ni, oherwydd, os daw e'n Ddeddf gwlad, bydd angen lleihau impact negyddol y Bil, a'r Act fel bydd hi amser hynny.
English: Thank you very much, Chair. Of course, my main interest in this is in Part 6 and the financial element, and I just wanted to know whether you as a Government have received any further information on the UK Government's intent in terms of how they intend to use the financial assistance powers that they hope to achieve within the Bill.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Gadeirydd. Wrth gwrs, fy niddordeb pennaf i yw Rhan 6 ar yr elfen gyllidol, ac rôn i jest eisiau gwybod, a dweud y gwir, a ydych chi fel Llywodraeth wedi cael unrhyw wybodaeth bellach ynglŷn â bwriad Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig o safbwynt y ffordd mae nhw'n bwriadu defnyddio'r pwerau cymorth ariannol maen nhw yn gobeithio eu cael yn y Bil.
English: The brief answer to that question is 'no'. I have raised the issue myself more than once with Ministers. I've not received a response. We've been given no assurances on the impact of this element on the block grant. There is nothing on the face of the Bill that gives any assurances to us that there is a constructive way of using these powers. We hear about the intentions to work in partnership; well, it's a very strange approach to partnership working if you're trying to undermine the principal reason for partnership. I don't think it's an issue of working with us; I think it's an issue of working around us.
Welsh: Yr ateb byr i'r cwestiwn yw 'na'. Dwi wedi codi'r cwestiwn fy hunan fwy nag unwaith gyda Gweinidogion. Dwi ddim wedi cael ateb i hynny. Does dim sicrwydd wedi'i roi ynglŷn ag impact yr elfen hon ar y block grant. Does dim ar wyneb y Bil sy'n rhoi unrhyw sicrwydd i ni fod ffordd adeiladol o ddefnyddio'r pwerau yma. Rŷn ni'n clywed am y bwriad o weithio mewn partneriaeth; wel, mae'n ffordd ryfedd i weithio mewn partneriaeth os ŷch chi'n ceisio tanseilio'r rheswm am bartneriaeth yn y lle cyntaf. Dwi ddim yn credu mai cwestiwn o weithio gyda ni sydd ar waith yma, ond dwi'n credu mai cwestiwn o weithio o'n hamgylch ni yw e.
English: I think this is another example of the fact that any claim of collaboration is an empty one. But we'll see what the upshot of this is. Do you anticipate, therefore, that legislation will be required in order to operate the UK shared prosperity fund, or any other replacement UK schemes for EU funding?
Welsh: Dwi'n credu bod hon yn enghraifft arall o'r ffaith mai geiriau gwag yn aml iawn yw'r honiad o gydweithio. Ond dyna fe; cawn ni weld beth fydd y canlyniad. Ydych chi yn rhagweld, felly, y bydd angen deddfwriaeth er mwyn bod yn sail i weithredu'r shared prosperity fund neu unrhyw gynlluniau eraill fyddai'n disodli cyllid yr Undeb Ewropeaidd?
English: We haven't seen enough of the detail; we haven't seen any detail in terms of the shared prosperity fund. So, in a way, it's not possible to answer your question directly. But what I can say is that the plans we have in place, if the UK Government stick to their word - . The arrangements that we have in place here in Wales to implement alternative plans in future wouldn't require primary legislation.
Welsh: Dŷn ni ddim wedi gweld digon o wybodaeth - rôn i'n mynd i ddweud 'manylion', ond dyw e ddim wedi cyrraedd y lefel hynny, hyd yn oed - am y shared prosperity fund. Felly dyw e ddim yn bosib ateb eich cwestiwn chi yn y ffordd uniongyrchol hynny. Ond beth gallaf ei ddweud yw bod y cynlluniau sydd gyda ni fel Llywodraeth, os gwnaiff Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Gyfunol gadw'u gair - . Dyw'r trefniadau sydd gyda ni yma yng Nghymru i ddodi ar waith gynlluniau amgen yn y dyfodol ddim yn golygu bod angen deddfwriaeth gynradd i wneud hynny.
English: I have a feeling that perhaps I know the answer to the next question, because the theme of your responses has been quite clear, but have you received any further information from the UK Government on proposals for a UK subsidy control regime, and what role the Welsh Government and other devolved Governments would play within it?
Welsh: Mae gyda fi deimlad efallai fy mod i'n gwybod yr ateb i'r cwestiwn nesaf, achos mae thema eich ymatebion chi'n ddigon clir, ond ydych chi wedi cael unrhyw wybodaeth bellach gan Lywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig ynghylch cynigion ar gyfer cyfundrefn rheoli cymhorthdaliadau yn y Deyrnas Unedig, ac efallai pa rôl fyddai gan Lywodraeth Cymru a Llywodraethau datganoledig eraill i'w chwarae yn hynny?
English: Well, I don't want to sound repetitive, but the answer is we haven't had any discussions on that. The UK Government, of course, doesn't recognise that the devolved Governments do have a role in that regard, although the change that they're seeking to make through this Bill to the devolved settlement reflects our principle that that is devolved. Now, the Westminster Government has brought forward a statutory instrument that revokes state aid legislation; we as Ministers haven't had an invitation to agree to that, but we have written to say that we should have that invitation, and we refuse to give our consent because we don't agree with what's been brought forward.
Welsh: Wel, dydw i ddim eisiau swnio'n ddiflas am hyn, ond yr ateb yw dydyn ni ddim wedi bod mewn trafodaethau ynglŷn â hynny. Dyw Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Gyfunol, wrth gwrs, ddim yn cydnabod bod gan y Llywodraethau datganoledig rôl yn hynny o beth, er bod y diwygiad buasen nhw'n ceisio'i wneud drwy'r Bil hwn i'r setliad datganoli yn awgrymu bod y setliad presennol, wrth gwrs, yn adlewyrchu ein hegwyddor ni bod hynny wedi'i ddatganoli. Mae'r Llywodraeth yn San Steffan wedi dod ymlaen ag SI sy'n dileu deddfwriaeth state aid, a dŷn ni fel Gweinidogion ddim wedi cael gwahoddiad i gytuno i hynny, ond rydyn ni wedi ysgrifennu i ddweud y dylen ni fod wedi cael gwahoddiad i gytuno, ac rŷn ni'n gwrthod rhoi ein cydsyniad gan ein bod ni ddim yn cytuno gyda'r hyn sy'n cael ei arddel.
English: So what does this tell us about the state of the UK? Certainty, it's not a union of equality in terms of the various governments and parliaments.
Welsh: So beth mae hyn yn ei ddweud am gyflwr y Deyrnas Unedig, te? Yn sicr, dyw hi ddim yn undeb gyfartal, ydy hi, o safbwynt y gwahanol lywodraethau a seneddau.
English: Well, in this specific area, the UK Government has never accepted that it's devolved. But in terms of the principle that you're referring to, even in the other devolved areas within the Bill, of course, we don't see that equal relationship that the four nations should have.
Welsh: Wel, yn y maes penodol hwn, dyw'r Llywodraeth yn San Steffan ddim wedi derbyn erioed ei fod e wedi'i ddatganoli. Ond o ran yr egwyddor rydych chi'n gosod, hyd yn oed mewn ardaloedd sydd wedi'u datganoli - hynny yw, lot o lefydd eraill yn y Bil - wrth gwrs, dŷn ni ddim yn gweld y berthynas hafal y dylai'r pedair Llywodraeth ei chael rhyngddyn nhw.
English: Welcome to this Plenary session. Before we begin, I want to set out a few points. A Plenary meeting held by video-conference, in accordance with the Standing Orders of the Welsh Parliament, constitutes Senedd proceedings for the purposes of the Government of Wales Act 2006. Some of the provisions of Standing Order 34 will apply to today's Plenary meeting, and these have been noted on your agenda. And I would remind Members that Standing Orders relating to order in Plenary meetings apply to this meeting.
Welsh: Croeso, bawb, i'r Cyfarfod Llawn. Cyn i ni ddechrau, dwi eisiau nodi ychydig o bwyntiau. Mae Cyfarfod Llawn a gynhelir drwy gynhadledd fideo, yn unol â Rheolau Sefydlog Senedd Cymru, yn gyfystyr â thrafodion y Senedd at ddibenion Deddf Llywodraeth Cymru 2006. Bydd rhai o ddarpariaethau Rheol Sefydlog 34 yn gymwys ar gyfer y Cyfarfod Llawn heddiw, ac mae'r rhain wedi'u nodi ar eich agenda chi. A dwi eisiau atgoffa'r Aelodau fod y Rheolau Sefydlog sy'n ymwneud â threfn yn y Cyfarfod Llawn yn gymwys i'r cyfarfod yma.
English: The first item on our agenda this afternoon is questions to the First Minister, and the first question is from Gareth Bennett. Is Gareth Bennett there?
Welsh: Yr eitem gyntaf ar ein hagenda ni ar gyfer y prynhawn, felly, yw'r cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog, ac mae'r cwestiwn cyntaf gan Gareth Bennett. Ydy Gareth Bennett yna?
English: Is Gareth Bennett there? I can't either see him or hear him. Okay, Gareth Bennett is not there to ask his question.
Welsh: A yw Gareth Bennett yna? Ni allaf ei weld na'i glywed. Iawn, nid yw Gareth Bennett yna i ofyn ei gwestiwn.
English: Question 2, therefore, David Rees
Welsh: Cwestiwn 2, felly, David Rees.
English: I can see you. Ask your question, David Rees. Thank you.
Welsh: Rwy'n gallu eich gweld chi. Gofynnwch eich cwestiwn, David Rees. Diolch.