English: Can I commend the Government for coming forward with a series of statements today on preparation for a 'no deal' Brexit? Can I commend the Brexit Minister and Counsel General for, to use a cricketing analogy, staying at the crease, showing stoicism, as his powers of voice fade? [ Laughter.] He's doing exceptionally well. There's an old Malay proverb, which is: prepare the umbrella, before it rains. And this is what we hoped that the UK Government was doing over the last two years, but here we are now looking at preparation for a deluge. So, I do welcome these statements. Of course, Malay is an area of the world in which one of the prominent Brexiteers has made his decision to invest his headquarters - in Singapore - having already decided that his electric car manufacturers would be in Singapore. When some of the Brexiteers who described the potential for Brexit and a 'hard deal' Brexit as, 'We would be the Singapore', whilst sitting just off western Europe, I don't think they meant that all the Brexiteers would flee the other direction to Singapore, but there we go. I wonder if he would give some reassurance to a group that I've just met along with David Rees and others, which was the steel group - the steel group in Tata, close to my constituency, with thousands of workers, but also their families as well, dependent on investment. Credit to Tata, which is investing - and the transition to the new ownership is progressing along - we have to see the outcome, but they're investing significant money in that plant. But they made the point to me before I left the meeting that 30 per cent of their manufacture of steel goes to the automobile industry; 80 per cent of it goes to the automobile industry in this country. Their exposure to Brexit, even though they're investing, is significant, and they're seeking assurance that, in the nirvana that the Counsel General has referred to, which some have described as, 'It'll be easy; we just step off the cliff and, hey, it's just business as usual' - they don't quite see it the same way, and they're seeking reassurance that, actually, their exposure to quotas and tariffs will be protected if we exit. It's not just on WTO rules, they're actually asking, 'Well, what does Government put up as the new barriers, because we could be flooded with cheap imports? We've been here before with steel in this country.' So, here's the hard reality. So, what reassurance, I would ask the Minister, can we have for them, and that we're looking at it? And could I ask him whether or not he agrees with me as well that this is not a question, as has been put today, about scare stories and so on, and rerunning project fear, because this is not simply the Labour Party. In fact, today we are having the headlines that we could have one, two or three dozen Conservative Ministers actually resigning in post unless they can vote in Parliament to stop a 'no deal' in its tracks. They get it, deeply. The business Secretary, Greg Clark, is on record as saying that it will cause incalculable damage to the UK. The defence Minister, Tobias Ellwood, is another, looking at the impact on defence. The chief executive of the civil service has said that the UK will never be fully prepared for Brexit, as he plans to move 5,000 staff into an emergency command and control centre. And the business Minister - I mean, these are people who are right at the coalface of engaging with people who'll be affected - Richard Harrington, declared today that a 'no deal' is an absolute disaster for the country and predicts that it could force Jaguar and Mini plants to shut down. I could go on and on. Would he agree with me that, actually, far from project fear and scare stories, what we are trying to do here is actually construct a genuine narrative about the risks and then what we can do, as has been done this afternoon, in actually preparing for them? I agree with the analysis he's made that it isn't a question of whether we'll be hit by a 'no deal' Brexit; it's a question of how hard. But could I put a couple of final questions? I've looked in detail at the Paratoi Cymru/Preparing Wales website and I'd recommend to all Members that they look at it. I would ask him, as Brexit Minister and Counsel General: what more can we do to disseminate that? Because it is lucid, it's very understandable, it's in the sort of language that businesses in my constituency and constituents themselves can look at. It's signposting to help, assistance and advice. What more can we do, as Assembly Members, and what more can the Government do, to actually disseminate that information? Finally, thanking both him and the First Minister for appearing in front of the European advisory group and also the programme monitoring committee last week and I look forward to welcoming them back again, would he liaise with other Ministers within the Government who are also involved in Brexit contingency planning and planning for no deal, just to alert them to the fact that some of these committees - the PMC and the EAG - might well also request their availability at some time to see preparedness in different parts of Government for the 'no deal' scenario?
Welsh: A gaf i gymeradwyo'r Llywodraeth am gyflwyno cyfres o ddatganiadau heddiw ar baratoi ar gyfer Brexit heb gytundeb? A gaf i gymeradwyo'r Gweinidog Brexit a'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol, i ddefnyddio cyfatebiaeth griced, am aros wrth y crîs, dangos stoiciaeth, wrth i bwerau ei lais bylu? [Chwerthin.] Mae'n gwneud yn eithriadol o dda. Mae hen ddihareb Maleiaidd, sef: paratowch yr ymbarél, cyn iddi fwrw glaw. A dyma beth yr oeddem yn gobeithio y bu Llywodraeth y DU yn ei wneud dros y ddwy flynedd ddiwethaf, ond dyma ni nawr yn ystyried paratoadau ar gyfer dilyw. Felly, rwy'n croesawu'r datganiadau hyn. Wrth gwrs, mae Malaia yn ardal o'r byd lle y mae un o gefnogwyr mwyaf amlwg Brexit wedi penderfynu lleoli ei bencadlys - yn Singapore - ar ôl penderfynu eisoes y byddai ei weithgynhyrchwyr ceir trydan yn Singapore hefyd. Pan ddisgrifiodd rhai o gefnogwyr Brexit y potensial ar gyfer Brexit a Brexit â 'chytundeb caled' fel, 'Byddem ni fel Singapore', yn gorwedd ychydig oddi ar orllewin Ewrop, nid wyf yn credu eu bod wedi bwriadu y byddai holl gefnogwyr Brexit yn ffoi i'r cyfeiriad arall i Singapore, ond dyna ni. Tybed a fyddai'n rhoi rhywfaint o sicrwydd i grŵp yr wyf i newydd gyfarfod ag ef, ynghyd â David Rees ac eraill, sef y grŵp dur - y grŵp dur yn Tata, sy'n agos at fy etholaeth i, sydd â miloedd o weithwyr, ond hefyd eu teuluoedd, sy'n ddibynnol ar fuddsoddiad. Pob clod i Tata, sy'n buddsoddi - ac mae'r pontio i'r perchnogion newydd yn datblygu - mae'n rhaid inni weld y canlyniad, ond maen nhw'n buddsoddi arian sylweddol yn y safle hwnnw. Ond fe wnaethon nhw'r pwynt wrthyf cyn i mi adael y cyfarfod bod 30 y cant o'r dur y maen nhw'n ei weithgynhyrchu yn mynd i'r diwydiant moduron; mae 80 y cant ohono yn mynd i'r diwydiant moduron yn y wlad hon. Mae effaith Brexit arnyn nhw, er eu bod yn buddsoddi, yn sylweddol, ac maen nhw'n ceisio sicrwydd, yn y baradwys y mae'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol wedi cyfeirio ato, y mae rhai wedi ei ddisgrifio fel, 'bydd yn hawdd; byddwn ni'n camu oddi ar y clogwyn, a hei, bydd hi'n fusnes fel arfer' - nid ydyn nhw'n gweld y sefyllfa yn yr un modd, ac maen nhw'n ceisio sicrwydd y byddan nhw'n cael eu diogelu rhag effaith a thariffau, mewn gwirionedd, os ydym ni'n gadael. Nid rheolau Sefydliad Masnach y Byd yn unig, mewn gwirionedd, maen nhw'n gofyn, 'Wel, beth mae'r Llywodraeth yn eu sefydlu fel rhwystrau newydd, oherwydd gallem ni gael llwyth o fewnforion rhad? Rydym ni wedi bod yn y sefyllfa hon o'r blaen o ran dur yn y wlad hon.' Felly, dyma'r realiti caled. Felly, pa sicrwydd, fe fyddwn i'n gofyn i'r Gweinidog, y gallwn ni ei gael ar eu cyfer, a'n bod yn ystyried hyn? A gaf i ofyn iddo a yw'n cytuno â mi ai peidio hefyd nad mater o godi bwganod ac ati yw hyn, fel sydd wedi ei nodi heddiw, ac ailadrodd ymgyrch i godi ofn, oherwydd nid dim ond y Blaid Lafur yw hyn. Yn wir, heddiw rydym yn gweld penawdau sy'n dweud y gallem fod ag, un, dau neu dri dwsin o Weinidogion Ceidwadol yn ymddiswyddo, mewn gwirionedd, oni bai y cânt bleidleisio yn y Senedd i atal Brexit heb gytundeb. Maen nhw'n deall hyn yn dda iawn. Mae'r Ysgrifennydd busnes, Greg Clark, wedi dweud ar goedd y bydd hyn yn achosi difrod anfesuradwy i'r DU. Mae'r Gweinidog amddiffyn, Tobias Ellwood, yn un arall, gan ystyried yr effaith ar amddiffyn. Mae prif weithredwr y gwasanaeth sifil wedi dweud na fydd y DU byth yn gwbl barod ar gyfer Brexit, ac mae'n bwriadu symud 5,000 o staff i ganolfan gorchymyn a rheoli argyfwng. Ac mae'r Gweinidog busnes - hynny yw, mae'r rhain yn bobl sydd yn y rheng flaen o ran ymgysylltu â phobl y bydd hyn yn effeithio arnyn nhw - Richard Harrington, wedi datgan heddiw bod ymadael heb gytundeb yn drychineb llwyr i'r wlad ac mae'n darogan y gallai orfodi safleoedd Jaguar a Mini i gau. Gallwn i fynd ymlaen ac ymlaen. A fyddai'n cytuno â mi, mewn gwirionedd, yn hytrach nag ymgyrch codi ofn a chodi bwganod, yr hyn yr ydym ni'n ceisio ei wneud yn y fan yma yw llunio naratif gwirioneddol am y risgiau ac yna'r hyn y gallwn ni ei wneud, fel y gwnaed y prynhawn yma, i baratoi ar eu cyfer mewn gwirionedd? Rwy'n cytuno â'i ddadansoddiad ef nad mater o ba un a gawn ni ein taro gan Brexit heb gytundeb yw hyn; mae'n fater o ba mor galed. Ond a gaf i ofyn dau gwestiwn olaf? Rwyf wedi edrych yn fanwl ar wefan Paratoi Cymru/Preparing Wales a byddwn yn argymell wrth bob aelod eu bod nhw'n edrych arni. Byddwn yn gofyn iddo, fel Gweinidog Brexit a'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol: beth arall allwn ni ei wneud i ledaenu honno? Oherwydd mae'n eglur, mae'n ddealladwy iawn, mae hi yn y math o iaith y gall busnesau yn fy etholaeth i a'm hetholwyr eu hunain edrych arni. Mae'n cyfeirio at gymorth, cefnogaeth a chyngor. Beth arall allwn ni, fel Aelodau Cynulliad, ei wneud a beth arall all y Llywodraeth ei wneud, i rannu'r wybodaeth honno mewn gwirionedd? Yn olaf, diolch iddo ef a'r Prif Weinidog am ymddangos o flaen y grŵp cynghori ar Ewrop a hefyd pwyllgor monitro'r rhaglen yr wythnos ddiwethaf ac rwy'n edrych ymlaen at eu croesawu'n ôl unwaith eto. A fyddai'n cydgysylltu â Gweinidogion eraill yn y Llywodraeth sydd hefyd yn rhan o'r gwaith o greu cynlluniau wrth gefn ar gyfer Brexit a chynllunio ar gyfer ymadael heb gytundeb, dim ond i dynnu eu sylw at y ffaith ei bod yn bosibl iawn y gallai rhai o'r pwyllgorau hyn - pwyllgor monitro'r rhaglen a'r grŵp cynghori ar Ewrop - hefyd ofyn iddyn nhw fod ar gael ar ryw adeg i weld y cynlluniau parodrwydd mewn gwahanol rannau o'r Llywodraeth ar gyfer y sefyllfa ymadael heb gytundeb?