English: It's a very important supplementary question that you raise. I know that Welsh Government departments are already starting this particular process, and I am as well, because there are many aspects and complications around this whole process. For example, we don't know what approach the UK Government is going to adopt to Brexit - for example, what the procedure might be for actually invoking article 50. I've seen reports - I'm sure the Member has as well - that there may be a legal application for a declaration from the court as to whether it's the royal prerogative or whether legislation has to be laid. That might be significant, if that were to be proceeded with and successful, because it would mean that something would have to come before Parliament that would set parameters for the actual negotiations themselves. I think also the other question is that, of course, many of the pieces of legislation that affect people, whether it be from the UK, whether it be through our own legislation - whether we would want to retain those, whether we can retain those - they impact very much in terms of aspects of policy, for example, of Government. We've had many discussions on procurement and we've had the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015, which give very significant standards, too, that we want to see applied in respect of those who actually work in this country. And, of course, there may be impacts, because much of what has been said is about abolition of red tape, but, of course, no-one has been able to get any clear clarification of which are the laws - what is the red tape - that those who supported Brexit would want to have reduced. I can only go back to the debates we had when the UK Government signed the social chapter, that it was, actually, many of the social rights and the employment rights. If we, as a Government, are supporting the maintenance of high standards of employment, steps that might be taken to reduce those pieces of legislation will obviously be of great consequence. For example, I notice there was an evaluation of some 2,500 pieces of legislation from the European Community, and, in fact, out of all of those, there were only 48 where the United Kingdom didn't actually get its way. So, what we're talking about are many aspects of legislation that actually are ones that Wales representatives, UK representatives, UK Government and so on, have actually promoted and wanted. So, if these are pieces of legislation that we've been involved in actually supporting and wanting, why would we actually want to see those abolished? Why would we want to see those revoked? Why would we not, for example, want to see those retained? So, I think there are many questions, but, yes, I will be certainly reviewing this very, very carefully. There are many complications, not least because we don't quite know the direction we're going. It's clear there was no plan A or plan B or plan C in respect of the consequences of this, but it is clearly serious and we have to deal with it.
Welsh: Rydych yn gofyn cwestiwn atodol pwysig iawn. Gwn fod adrannau Llywodraeth Cymru eisoes yn dechrau ar y broses benodol hon, ac rwyf innau hefyd, oherwydd mae yna lawer o agweddau a chymhlethdodau ynghlwm wrth yr holl broses hon. Er enghraifft, ni wyddom pa agwedd y mae Llywodraeth y DU yn mynd i'w mabwysiadu tuag at adael yr UE - er enghraifft, beth fyddai'r drefn ar gyfer galw erthygl 50 i rym. Gwelais adroddiadau - rwy'n siŵr fod yr Aelod wedi eu gweld hefyd - y gallai fod cais cyfreithiol am ddatganiad gan y llys ynglŷn ag a yw'n uchelfraint frenhinol neu a oes rhaid gosod deddfwriaeth. Gallai hynny fod yn arwyddocaol, pe bwrid ymlaen â hynny a'i fod yn llwyddiannus, gan y byddai'n golygu y byddai'n rhaid i rywbeth ddod gerbron y Senedd a fyddai'n gosod paramedrau ar gyfer y trafodaethau eu hunain. Rwy'n credu hefyd mai'r cwestiwn arall, wrth gwrs, yw bod llawer o'r darnau o ddeddfwriaeth sy'n effeithio ar bobl, boed yn y DU, neu drwy ein deddfwriaeth ein hunain - pa un a fyddem am gadw'r rheini, pa un a allwn gadw'r rheini - yn effeithio'n fawr o ran agweddau ar bolisi Llywodraeth, er enghraifft. Rydym wedi cael nifer o drafodaethau ar gaffael ac rydym wedi cael Deddf Llesiant Cenedlaethau'r Dyfodol (Cymru) 2015, sy'n rhoi safonau arwyddocaol iawn hefyd, safonau y byddem am eu gweld yn cael eu cymhwyso mewn perthynas â'r rhai sy'n gweithio yn y wlad hon mewn gwirionedd. Ac wrth gwrs, gall fod effeithiau, gan fod llawer o'r hyn sydd wedi'i ddweud yn ymwneud â diddymu biwrocratiaeth, ond wrth gwrs, nid oes unrhyw un wedi llwyddo i gael unrhyw eglurhad clir ynglŷn â pha ddeddfau - beth yw'r fiwrocratiaeth - y byddai'r rhai a gefnogodd y cynnig i adael yr UE eisiau cyfyngu ar eu nifer. Ni allaf ond mynd yn ôl at y dadleuon a gawsom pan lofnododd Llywodraeth y DU y bennod gymdeithasol, mai'r hyn oedd hi mewn gwirionedd oedd llawer o'r hawliau cymdeithasol a'r hawliau cyflogaeth. Os ydym ni, fel Llywodraeth, yn cefnogi cynnal safonau cyflogaeth uchel, mae'n amlwg y bydd y camau y gellid eu cymryd i leihau nifer y darnau hynny o ddeddfwriaeth o bwys mawr. Er enghraifft, rwy'n sylwi bod gwerthusiad wedi'i wneud o tua 2,500 o ddarnau o ddeddfwriaeth y Gymuned Ewropeaidd, ac mewn gwirionedd, o bob un o'r rheini, dim ond yn achos 48 ohonynt yn unig y methodd y Deyrnas Unedig â chael ei ffordd ei hun mewn gwirionedd. Felly, yr hyn rydym yn sôn amdano yw nifer o agweddau ar ddeddfwriaeth y mae cynrychiolwyr Cymru, cynrychiolwyr y DU, Llywodraeth y DU ac yn y blaen, wedi eu hyrwyddo a'u heisiau mewn gwirionedd. Felly, os yw'r rhain yn ddarnau o ddeddfwriaeth rydym wedi ymwneud â'u cefnogi ac yn awyddus i'w gweld mewn gwirionedd, pam y byddem am eu gweld yn cael eu diddymu? Pam y byddem am eu gweld yn cael eu dirymu? Pam na fyddem, er enghraifft, am eu gweld yn cael eu cadw? Felly, rwy'n meddwl bod llawer o gwestiynau ond byddaf yn sicr yn adolygu hyn yn ofalus tu hwnt. Mae yna lawer o gymhlethdodau, nid yn lleiaf oherwydd nad ydym yn gwybod yn iawn i ba gyfeiriad rydym yn mynd. Mae'n amlwg nad oedd yna gynllun A neu gynllun B neu gynllun C o ran canlyniadau hyn, ond mae'n amlwg yn ddifrifol ac mae'n rhaid i ni ymdrin ag ef.