English: Well, the Welsh Government has been very, very clear that the UK Government conduct falls far short of its repeated promises in a number of guises, and we're due to lose £1 billion. That's what Wales is going to lose over the next few years - £1 billion. And I don't see how any reasonable person could defend that, regardless of their politics. I don't think anyone came into this place to try to justify £1 billion being shed from Wales. And, of course, we're also seeing regions of England, Scotland, Northern Ireland being treated in the same way, because the UK Government has deliberately chosen to underfund those former EU programmes despite clear pledges and promises that no-one would lose a single penny. And there is then the concern about how the money is spent. There is no strategic understanding of how that money is going to be spent. The very small sums of money that are not strategically linked in the forerunner schemes don't give much hope for the future, if that were to be the continued path. And it is undeniably the case that having a UK Conservative Member of Parliament means you're more likely to receive money from way the funds have been allocated. And that simply doesn't match a map of need, in either Wales, England, Scotland or any other part of the UK. So, there's an obvious challenge here. There is, though, a way to make sure that this doesn't happen, and that's to have a proper understanding, with published criteria, for how the money is going to be used - a UK-wide framework, with a proper role for the Welsh Government and our partners. That is the way this should work, and could work. It's still not too late for Michael Gove to change course for whichever particular reason, but as we've seen on free ports in Scotland, it is possible to find agreement if the UK Government are in a position where they think that really does matter. The current course of action will see Wales having less say over less money, and that cannot be a good outcome for any Member of this place.
Welsh: Wel, mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi dweud yn glir iawn fod ymddygiad Llywodraeth y DU yn bell iawn o'r addewidion a wnaed ganddynt dro ar ôl tro ar sawl ffurf, ac rydym yn mynd i golli £1 biliwn. Dyna faint y bydd Cymru'n ei golli dros yr ychydig flynyddoedd nesaf - £1 biliwn. Ac ni allaf weld sut y gallai unrhyw unigolyn rhesymol amddiffyn hynny, ni waeth beth fo'u gwleidyddiaeth. Ni chredaf fod unrhyw un wedi dod i'r lle hwn i geisio cyfiawnhau Cymru'n colli £1 biliwn. Ac wrth gwrs, rydym hefyd yn gweld rhanbarthau yn Lloegr, yr Alban, Gogledd Iwerddon yn cael eu trin yn yr un modd, gan fod Llywodraeth y DU wedi dewis tanariannu'r hen raglenni UE hynny yn fwriadol er gwaethaf addewidion clir na fyddai unrhyw un yn colli'r un geiniog. Ac mae pryder wedyn ynglŷn â sut y caiff yr arian ei wario. Nid oes dealltwriaeth strategol o sut y caiff yr arian hwnnw ei wario. Nid yw'r symiau bach iawn o arian nad ydynt wedi'u cysylltu'n strategol yn y cynlluniau rhagflaenol yn rhoi llawer o obaith ar gyfer y dyfodol, pe byddem yn parhau ar y llwybr hwnnw. Ac ni ellir gwadu bod cael Aelod Seneddol Ceidwadol yn y DU yn golygu eich bod yn fwy tebygol o gael arian drwy'r ffordd y mae'r arian wedi'i ddyrannu. Ac nid yw hynny'n cyfateb i fap o angen yng Nghymru, Lloegr, yr Alban nac unrhyw ran arall o'r DU. Felly, mae her amlwg yma. Serch hynny, mae ffordd o sicrhau nad yw hyn yn digwydd, sef drwy gael dealltwriaeth lawn, gyda meini prawf cyhoeddedig, o sut y caiff yr arian ei ddefnyddio - fframwaith DU gyfan, gyda rôl briodol i Lywodraeth Cymru a'n partneriaid. Dyna sut y dylai hyn weithio, a sut y gallai weithio. Nid yw'n rhy hwyr i Michael Gove newid cyfeiriad am ba bynnag reswm, ond fel rydym wedi'i weld gyda phorthladdoedd rhydd yn yr Alban, mae'n bosibl dod i gytundeb os yw Llywodraeth y DU mewn sefyllfa lle y credant fod hynny'n wirioneddol bwysig. Bydd y llwybr presennol yn golygu y bydd gan Gymru lai o lais ynghylch llai o arian, ac ni all hynny fod yn ganlyniad da i unrhyw Aelod yn y lle hwn.