English: You heard the First Minister this morning talking about the fact that, actually, we need to wean ourselves off this assumption that you will always see a GP. There are people who are as good, as qualified, who can support us with our health needs who are alternatives to GPs, and we need to understand that. You mentioned very briefly ambulance services. It's impossible for me to go through all of the points that you made, but you're aware that we have a whole programme of work that we're undertaking in relation to ambulance, trying to improve the situation with ambulances. We've spent an additional £25 million in terms of recurrent funding, huge numbers of ambulance workers have been recruited, there's been the creation of urgent primary care centres - so, lots of things are ongoing to try and take the pressure off our ambulance services. Turning to the UK report, yes, you're absolutely right, it's a report that looks at the situation in the UK, but isn't it interesting that you come straight in here and try and throw the problems here at us in Wales? The fact is that they outline a situation like the fact that they should have taken a more cautious approach. Well, I think most people in Wales would understand that we have taken a more cautious approach than they have in the UK. The other thing, of course, is that we do have discussions in our Cabinet that I think are robust but are respectful, and we don't have groupthink. Part of the issue in the UK has been that there has been such an emphasis and such a focus on trying to keep the economy going that sometimes they've lost sight of the importance of public health. Getting that balance right, I think, has been something that we have tried to get right within the situation in Wales. The other thing that they mention in this report is the fact that, actually, everything is too centralised. You've only got to look at the test, trace and protect system; the ridiculous amounts of money that they spent on that system in England, on private companies that have been completely ineffective when you compare them to us working in partnership with local government to drive a system that has been massively effective. I think it's very important that people understand that, actually, we are not in the same situation, as Wales. And you will be aware, also, that the First Minister has asked Michael Gove, in a letter, to set out, 'These are the things that we would like to see you address if there is going to be a public inquiry for the UK - we want these things to be set out.' Now, we're still waiting for an answer to that letter. I think it's absolutely clear that if there is a respect for looking at the kind of detail that the Welsh public will want to see, and we will want to see, then I think we will be able to go with the UK. If that doesn't happen, then of course we don't want to be a footnote in the UK public inquiry. I think that's enough on that one. Thank you.
Welsh: Gwnaethoch chi glywed y Prif Weinidog y bore yma yn sôn am y ffaith bod angen i ni, mewn gwirionedd, ddiddyfnu ein hunain oddi ar y dybiaeth hon y byddwch chi bob amser yn gweld meddyg teulu. Mae yna bobl sydd cystal, yr un mor gymwys, sy'n gallu ein cefnogi gyda'n hanghenion iechyd sy'n ddewisiadau eraill i feddygon teulu, ac mae angen i ni ddeall hynny. Fe wnaethoch chi sôn yn fyr iawn am wasanaethau ambiwlans. Mae'n amhosibl i mi fynd drwy'r holl bwyntiau yr oeddech chi wedi eu gwneud, ond rydych chi'n ymwybodol bod gennym ni raglen waith gyfan yr ydym ni'n ei chynnal o ran ambiwlansys, gan geisio gwella'r sefyllfa o ran ambiwlansys. Rydym ni wedi gwario £25 miliwn yn ychwanegol o ran cyllid rheolaidd, mae nifer enfawr o weithwyr ambiwlans wedi eu recriwtio, mae canolfannau gofal sylfaenol brys wedi eu creu - felly, mae llawer o bethau'n mynd rhagddynt i geisio tynnu'r pwysau oddi ar ein gwasanaethau ambiwlans. Gan droi at adroddiad y DU, ydych, rydych chi'n llygad eich lle, mae'n adroddiad sy'n ystyried y sefyllfa yn y DU, ond onid yw'n ddiddorol eich bod chi'n dod yn syth i mewn yma a cheisio taflu'r problemau atom ni yma yng Nghymru? Y ffaith yw eu bod yn amlinellu sefyllfa fel y ffaith y dylen nhw fod wedi mabwysiadu dull mwy gofalus. Wel, rwyf i'n credu y byddai'r rhan fwyaf o bobl yng Nghymru yn deall ein bod ni wedi defnyddio dull mwy gofalus nag sydd ganddyn nhw yn y DU. Y peth arall, wrth gwrs, yw ein bod ni yn cael trafodaethau yn ein Cabinet sy'n gadarn yn fy marn i ond sy'n barchus, ac nid ydym ni'n meddwl fel grŵp. Rhan o'r mater yn y DU yw bod cymaint o bwyslais wedi bod a chymaint o ganolbwyntio ar geisio cadw'r economi i fynd sydd weithiau wedi colli golwg ar bwysigrwydd iechyd y cyhoedd. Mae cael y cydbwysedd hwnnw yn iawn, yn fy marn i, wedi bod yn rhywbeth yr ydym ni wedi ceisio ei gael yn iawn yn y sefyllfa yng Nghymru. Y peth arall y maen nhw'n sôn amdano yn yr adroddiad hwn yw'r ffaith bod popeth, mewn gwirionedd, yn rhy ganolog. Mae ond angen i chi edrych ar y system brofi, olrhain a diogelu; y symiau hurt o arian y gwnaethon nhw eu gwario ar y system honno yn Lloegr, ar gwmnïau preifat sydd wedi bod yn gwbl aneffeithiol pan fyddwch chi'n eu cymharu nhw â ni yn gweithio mewn partneriaeth â llywodraeth leol i lywio system sydd wedi bod yn hynod effeithiol. Rwy'n credu ei bod yn bwysig iawn bod pobl yn deall mewn gwirionedd nad ydym ni, fel Cymru, yn yr un sefyllfa. A byddwch chi'n ymwybodol hefyd fod y Prif Weinidog wedi gofyn i Michael Gove mewn llythyr nodi, 'Dyma'r pethau yr hoffem ni eich gweld chi'n ymdrin â nhw os bydd ymchwiliad cyhoeddus i'r DU - rydym ni eisiau i'r pethau hyn gael eu nodi.' Nawr, rydym ni'n dal i aros am ateb i'r llythyr hwnnw. Rwy'n credu ei bod yn gwbl glir, os oes parch tuag at edrych ar y math o fanylion y bydd y cyhoedd yng Nghymru yn dymuno eu gweld, ac y byddwn ni yn dymuno ei weld, yna rwy'n credu y byddwn ni'n gallu mynd gyda'r DU. Os nad yw hynny'n digwydd, yna wrth gwrs, nid ydym ni eisiau bod yn droednodyn yn ymchwiliad cyhoeddus y DU. Rwy'n credu bod hynny yn ddigon ar hynny. Diolch.