techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, I suppose part of the difference would be that people in parts of England have more money, so they can purchase assistance from the private sector, and there is less money available for them to go private in Wales. So, that might go some way to explaining the difference - that, in general, people are poorer in Wales. So, people who have come off the waiting lists in England are those who had the money in the first place to go private. So, I hope that that is some kind of explanation. I don't know whether Judith wants to add to that.
Welsh: Wel, I suppose, rhan o'r gwahaniaeth fyddai bod pobl mewn rhannau o Loegr gyda fwy o arian, fel eu bod nhw'n gallu prynu'r help o'r sector preifat, a bod llai o arian ar gael iddyn nhw fynd yn breifat yng Nghymru. Felly, byddai hwnna efallai yn mynd rhyw ffordd i egluro efallai'r gwahaniaeth - bod, yn gyffredinol, pobl yn dlotach yng Nghymru. Felly, byddai'r bobl sydd wedi dod oddi ar y rhestrau aros yn Lloegr yn bobl oedd gyda'r arian yn y lle cyntaf i fynd yn breifat. So, gobeithio bod hwnna'n egluro rhywfaint. Dwi ddim yn gwybod os mae Judith eisiau ychwanegu at hynny.
English: I, certainly, as a constituency Member, am noticing that more and more people are going private, possibly because they have the money and are in a situation to do so, possibly because they feel they don't have a choice and that they have to go into debt because of the pain of waiting and so forth. There is a danger here, of course, that we're increasingly seeing a two-tier system here, and that that has been accelerated by the pandemic and the fact that people feel more desperate now. What is the Government's assessment of that? Because I'm quite sure that the statistics would show that more people are choosing to go private.
Welsh: Dwi yn sicr, fel Aelod etholaeth, yn sylwi ar fwy o bobl yn dweud eu bod nhw'n mynd yn breifat, o bosib oherwydd bod ganddyn nhw'r pres ac mewn sefyllfa i wneud hynny, o bosib oherwydd eu bod nhw'n teimlo nad oes gyda nhw dewis ond mynd i ddyled oherwydd y boen o fod ar restrau aros hir ati. Mae yna berig yn fan hyn, onid oes, ein bod ni'n gweld gwasanaeth iechyd dwy haen yn datblygu fwy, a bod hynny wedi cael ei brysuro gan y pandemig a'r ffaith bod pobl yn teimlo'n fwy desbrad rŵan. Beth ydy asesiad y Llywodraeth o hynny? Achos dwi'n reit saff y byddai'r ystadegau'n dangos bod yna fwy o bobl yn dewis mynd yn breifat.
English: Well, I am concerned about that. I'm certainly concerned about the fact that, if you see more people using the private sector, then it makes it more difficult to make the case for the NHS in terms of taxes that you levy and so on. So, it is vital for me that we are able to provide that service. And that's why I don't want to apologise for the fact that we are using the private sector to accelerate services, because I think that the other point is that people will have to pay to go private themselves, and, for me, that's worse. I'm clear about that, that there is a responsibility for us to move as quickly as possible so that we don't see those different tiers that you identified being added to by people who, as you say, go into debt and go into financial difficulties.
Welsh: Wel, dwi yn poeni am hynny. Dwi'n sicr yn poeni am y ffaith, os ŷch chi'n gweld mwy o bobl yn defnyddio'r sector preifat, mae e'n ei gwneud hi'n fwy anodd i wneud yn achos dros yr NHS o ran faint ŷch chi'n codi mewn trethi ac ati. Felly, mae'n hollbwysig i fi ein bod ni'n gallu cynnig y gwasanaeth yna. A dyna pam dwi ddim eisiau ymddiheuro am y ffaith ein bod ni'n defnyddio'r sector preifat i fynd yn gyflymach, achos dwi'n meddwl bod y peth arall yw bod pobl yn gorfod talu'n breifat, ac mae hwnna'n waeth i fi. Felly, dwi'n glir o ran hynny, bod yna gyfrifoldeb arnom ni i symud mor gyflym ag sy'n bosibl fel dydyn ni ddim yn gweld yr haenau yna yn cael eu hychwanegu atyn nhw gan bobl sydd, fel rŷch chi'n dweud, yn mynd i mewn i ddyled ac yn mynd mewn i drafferthion.
English: Thank you very much for going through so many areas. I know we've got some time left to discuss the latest on COVID. One point regarding the vaccination of children. I'm still getting a lot of correspondence regarding what the plans are for including children in the vaccination programme. Many countries are already doing that for under 12s and it is very striking to see the spread of the virus in schools and the impact that that is having in society on a wider basis. Is this what would complete the process, that we bring schoolchildren into the vaccination programme, and where is the Government on this question now?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn am fynd drwy gymaint o feysydd. Dwi'n gwybod bod gennym ni ychydig bach o amser ar ôl i drafod y diweddaraf o ran COVID. Un cwestiwn penodol ynglŷn â brechu plant. Dwi'n dal yn cael nifer yn cysylltu â mi i ofyn pa gynlluniau sydd yna i drio cynnwys plant pump i 12 yn y rhaglen frechu greiddiol. Mae llawer o wledydd yn gwneud hynny'n barod, ac mae'n drawiadol cymaint o ledaeniad o'r feirws sydd yna o fewn ysgolion a chymaint o impact mae hynny yn ei gael ar gymdeithas ehangach. Ai dyma fyddai'n cwblhau'r broses, ein bod ni'n dod â phlant ysgol i mewn i'r rhaglen frechu, a lle mae'r Llywodraeth arni o ran y cwestiwn yma ar hyn o bryd?
English: Thank you very much. Well, we are in the position where we are awaiting the JCVIs recommendations, and we are expecting them - well, we were expecting them this week, truth be told, but they haven't come to hand yet. I think that it is fair to say that we have to look at the situation in its entirety, where we have to consider what is best for the children, not just in terms of being vaccinated but also keeping them at school. But you do have to weigh that up against the personal impact and so on. So, that's why the right thing to do is to leave it to the scientists to look at the data, to look at what's best, and for them then to make a recommendation to us. And we will then consider those recommendations, and hopefully we'll be able to make a decision on that in the very near future.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr. Wel, rŷn ni mewn sefyllfa lle rŷn ni'n aros am argymhellion y JCVI, ac rŷn ni'n disgwyl y rheini efallai - wel, roedden ni'n eu disgwyl nhw wythnos yma, mewn gwirionedd, ond dydyn nhw ddim wedi dod eto. Dwi'n meddwl ei bod hi'n deg i ddweud bod yn rhaid inni edrych ar sefyllfa lle mae'n rhaid inni ystyried beth sydd orau i'r plant, nid jest o ran cael y brechlyn, ond o ran eu cadw nhw yn eu hysgolion nhw. Ond mae'n rhaid ichi bwyso a mesur hynny yn erbyn yr effaith bersonol ac ati. Felly, dyna pam mai'r peth cywir i'w wneud yw gadael i'r gwyddonwyr edrych ar y data, i edrych ar beth sydd orau, ac iddyn nhw wedyn roi argymhellion i ni. Ac mi fyddwn ni'n ystyried yr argymhellion, a gobeithio byddwn ni yn gallu gwneud penderfyniad ar hynny yn y dyfodol agos iawn.
English: And just to confirm, you're expecting that within a matter of days, because it's been a long time coming, hasn't it?
Welsh: Ac i gadarnhau, rydych chi'n disgwyl hynny o fewn mater o ddyddiau, felly, achos mae o wedi bod yn hir iawn yn dod, onid ydy?
English: Yes. I know that they have been considering this issue for a long time and, of course, you do have to bear in mind what the impact of that would be on the rest of the vaccination programme. So, if we were to see, for example, that immunity decreased amongst those who received the booster very early on, if we were to see another wave - how would that affect this? So, you can't just consider them in isolation from the other decisions related to vaccination.
Welsh: Ydy. Dwi'n gwybod eu bod nhw wedi bod yn pwyso a mesur am amser hir ac, wrth gwrs, mae'n rhaid i chi ystyried, wedyn, beth fyddai effaith hynny ar weddill y rhaglen frechu. Felly, os byddaf i'n gweld, er enghraifft, fod immunity yn mynd i lawr ymhlith y bobl gafodd y booster yn gynnar, pe byddem ni'n gweld ton arall - sut fyddai hynny'n effeithio ar hyn? Felly, allwch chi ddim jest ystyried nhw wedi eu hynysu o'r penderfyniadau eraill sy'n ymwneud â brechu chwaith.
English: A very warm welcome to you to this meeting this morning, and welcome to witnesses. Thank you for joining us. We'll move through the agenda, but just to say that this meeting will be broadcast live on Senedd.tv, and a Record of Proceedings will be published for the public. As usual, aside from the procedural adaptations related to conducting proceedings remotely, all other Standing Order requirements for committees remain in place. We have received an apology this morning from Rhianon Passmore, who is unable to join us. And just to ask whether Members have any interests to declare. I see that there are none. There we are.
Welsh: Croeso cynnes i chi i'r cyfarfod y bore yma, a chroeso i'r tystion hefyd am ddod atom ni. Gwnawn ni symud ymlaen drwy'r agenda, ond jest i ddweud y bydd hwn yn cael ei ddarlledu ar Senedd.tv, a bydd Cofnod y Trafodion ar gael ar gyfer y cyhoedd. Ar wahân i addasiadau gweithdrefnol sy'n ymwneud â chynnal trafodion o bell, mae'r holl ofynion eraill o ran Rheolau Sefydlog ar gyfer pwyllgorau yn aros yn yr un lle. Rydyn ni wedi derbyn ymddiheuriad y bore yma oddi wrth Rhianon Passmore, sydd yn methu â bod efo ni. Jest o ran unrhyw beth arall, oes yna unrhyw fuddiannau sydd angen eu nodi? Dwi ddim yn meddwl. Dyna ni.
English: We'll move on to item 2 on the agenda, which is papers to note. We will note these unless Members have any questions to ask or any comments to make. I see that there are no comments. So, we'll move on; those papers are noted.
Welsh: Fe wnawn ni symud ymlaen i eitem 2. Eitem 2 ydy papurau i'w nodi. Dwi'n meddwl y gwnawn ni nodi'r rhain oni bai fod gan rywun unrhyw beth i'w holi amdanyn nhw, neu unrhyw nodiadau arnyn nhw. Mae hwnna'n iawn.
English: We'll move on. As I said, a very warm welcome to our two witnesses to the meeting this morning, Emyr Lewis and Sir Paul Silk; it's lovely to see you both. Could you give your names and your roles just for the public record please? If we start with Paul Silk please.
Welsh: Fe wnawn ni symud ymlaen. Fel dwi'n dweud, croeso cynnes iawn i chi'ch dau y bore yma, Emyr Lewis a Syr Paul Silk; mae'n neis eich gweld chi. Fyddech chi'n gallu jest nodi eich enwau a'ch swyddogaethau ar gyfer y record os gwelwch yn dda? Os gwnawn ni gychwyn efo Paul Silk, byddai hynny'n grêt.
English: Good morning. I'm Emyr Lewis, I'm the head of the Department of Law and Criminology at Aberystwyth University.
Welsh: Bore da. Emyr Lewis ydw i, dwi'n bennaeth Adran y Gyfraith a Throseddeg ym Mhrifysgol Aberystwyth.
English: Thank you very much. A very warm welcome to the two of you this morning, and thank you for giving your time to give evidence to us; it is wonderful to have you here. We'll go through a few questions that we have with regard to the Bill before us.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, a chroeso cynnes iawn i chi y bore yma. Diolch i chi am roi eich amser i ddod i roi tystiolaeth i ni; mae'n dda eich cael chi yma. Rydyn ni'n mynd i fynd drwy ychydig o gwestiynau sydd gennym ni ynglŷn â'r Bil yma sydd gerbron.
English: Yes, two points to make very briefly - the first point just to echo what Paul has just said, and, in the second instance, to understand the rationale for this concern. The rationale relates to democracy and what the function of an elected body is in a modern democracy, where we have a society that is increasingly complex, and is regulated in ever more complex ways, and that leads Governments to be wanting to do more things without having to go through the nuisance of consulting the elected representatives on the one hand, and one can see the common sense in that sometimes, but, on the other hand, the core question arises of where the boundaries are. Where is the threshold in terms of what Governments should be allowed to do that, in the first instance, is the appropriate role for the democratic legislature? And the second point relates - to echo another thing that Paul said - to taking these steps with regard to taxation. It is part of the constitutional structure of the United Kingdom that the Crown doesn't have the power to raise taxes on the people without the permission of the Parliament. It has been so since the Bill of Rights in the seventeenth century, and that hasn't changed. And it appears to me that what is requested in this Bill, whilst some aspects of it make common sense in terms of complexity and making things easier, much of this prospective legislation takes us to a point that is contrary to that principle that the source of important decisions with regard to taxation is the legislature, and not the Government.
Welsh: Oes, dau beth yn fyr iawn - y pwynt cyntaf i adleisio beth mae Paul newydd ei ddweud, ac yn ail, i ddeall y rhesymau dros y pryder yma. Mae'r rhesymau dros y pryder yma yn ymwneud â democratiaeth a beth yw swyddogaeth corff etholedig mewn democratiaeth fodern, lle mae gennym ni gymdeithas sydd yn gynyddol gymhleth, ac sydd yn cael ei rheoleiddio mewn ffyrdd mwy cymhleth, ac mae hynny yn arwain Llywodraethau i fod eisiau bod yn gallu gwneud mwy o bethau heb orfod mynd drwy'r niwsans o ymgynghori gyda'r cynrychiolwyr democrataidd ar y naill law, ac mae rhywun yn gallu gweld synnwyr cyffredin weithiau mewn hynny, ond, ar y llaw arall, mae'r cwestiwn creiddiol yn codi: ble mae'r ffiniau? Ble mae'r ffiniau dros yr hyn y dylid ei ganiatáu i Lywodraethau ei wneud sydd, yn y lle cyntaf, yn briod faes y ddeddfwrfa ddemocrataidd? Ac mae'r ail bwynt yn ymwneud â - unwaith eto yn adleisio rhywbeth ddywedodd Paul - chymryd y camau hyn ym maes trethi. Mae'n rhan o wead cyfansoddiad y Deyrnas Gyfunol nad oes grym gan y Goron i drethu'r bobl heb ganiatâd y Senedd. Mae felly ers y Bill of Rights yn yr ail ganrif ar bymtheg, a dyw e ddim wedi newid. Ac mae'n ymddangos i mi fod yr hyn y gofynnir amdano yn y ddeddf yma, tra bod ambell i agwedd ohoni'n gwneud synnwyr cyffredin o ran cymhlethdod a gwneud pethau yn rhwydd, wedi dweud hynny, mae llawer iawn o'r ddarpar ddeddf yn fan yma yn mynd â ni at bwynt sydd fel petai'n tynnu'n groes i'r egwyddor yna mai ffynhonnell penderfyniadau pwysig ynglŷn â threthi yw'r ddeddfwrfa, ac nid y Llywodraeth.
English: Emyr, if you want to respond to that question, and possibly the supplementary with regard to where this could go if it was taken to the extreme.
Welsh: Emyr, os ydych chi eisiau cymryd y cwestiwn yna, ac o bosib yr un atodol yna ynglŷn â lle byddai'n gallu mynd os oedd yn cael ei gymryd i'r extreme, felly.
English: - Emyr, would that help to be able to move this forward and to allow greater scrutiny of the Government on this?
Welsh: - Emyr, a fyddai hynny yn helpu i allu symud hyn yn ei flaen ac i fod ychydig bach yn fwy o sgrwtini ar y Llywodraeth ynglŷn â hyn?
English: It could, but one would need to see this being drafted carefully, because it could deal with this question of amending the law and maintaining the primacy of the Senedd over taxation law. In other words, the Government tells the Senedd, 'We would like to use these powers for these aims', and the Senedd then says, 'Well, yes, okay, do that,' and I see that that would be a similar way forward to that seen in the London Parliament, which can approve taxation changes before they become part of the Westminster Government's Finance Act. It deals with that, but it doesn't deal with two issues. It doesn't deal sufficiently with the kinds of changes that I've mentioned that would have a significant impact on the citizen's position, nor does it deal with Paul's point with regard to scrutiny. And, as I said, the greater the impact on the citizen, the greater the need for scrutiny in making amendments. So, it could work. It would be better in terms of ensuring the primacy of the Senedd as a legislature, as it would be the Senedd and not the Government that would be deciding when the 'switch' would be used, if I can use another word instead of 'lock'. So, the switch would be turned on, but it wouldn't, in my view, in and of itself, be sufficient to respond to those areas under this Bill where there are very wide-ranging powers being requested by the Government.
Welsh: Mi allai wneud, ond byddai rhywun angen gweld y peth wedi ei ddrafftio yn ofalus, oherwydd mi allai ddelio â'r cwestiwn yma o ddiwygio'r gyfraith a chynnal blaenoriaeth y Senedd dros ddeddf trethiannu. Mewn geiriau eraill, mae'r Llywodraeth yn dweud wrth y Senedd, 'Hoffen ni ddefnyddio'r pwerau ar gyfer y dibenion yma,' ac mae'r Senedd yn dweud, 'O'r gorau, te, gwnewch hynny', a dwi'n gweld hynny yn ffordd rhywbeth yn debyg, a dweud y gwir, i'r ffordd mae Senedd Llundain yn medru gosod sêl ei bendith rhag blaen ar ddiwygiadau trethiannol cyn bod y rheini'n dod yn rhan o Ddeddf Gyllid Llywodraeth San Steffan. Mae'n delio â hynny, ond dydy o ddim yn delio â dau beth. Dydy o ddim yn delio'n ddigonol gyda'r math o newid dwi wedi sôn amdano fo sydd yn golygu amharu go sylweddol ar sefyllfa y dinesydd; dydy o ddim chwaith yn delio â phwynt Paul ynglŷn â chraffu. Fel roeddwn i'n dweud, po fwyaf yr ymyrraeth ar y dinesydd, po fwyaf yr angen ar waith craffu wrth wneud diwygiadau. Felly, mi allasai weithio. Mi fyddai'n well o safbwynt cynnal blaenoriaeth, primacy, y Senedd fel deddfwrfa, gan mai hi ac nid y Llywodraeth fydd yn penderfynu pryd mae'r 'switsh' yn cael ei gosod, os caf i ddefnyddio gair arall yn lle 'clo'. Felly, bydd y switsh yn cael ei osod ymlaen, ond fyddai fo ddim, yn fy marn i, ynddo'i hun, yn ddigonol i ddelio â'r ardaloedd hynny dan y Mesur yma lle mae yna bwerau eang yn cael eu rhoi neu yn cael eu gofyn amdanyn nhw gan y Llywodraeth.
English: No, I'm content to wait. I think that what Paul says is sensible.
Welsh: Na, dwi'n hapus i aros. Dwi'n credu bod beth mae Paul yn ei ddweud yn synhwyrol iawn.
English: I believe as far as the Bill is in question, I don't have anything to add to what Paul has already said - the second best, or third best, or fourth best option would be to have a sunset clause. In terms of the regulations, it doesn't make sense to me to have a sunset clause in those, because the intention of the regulations is to change primary legislation. If you change the main legislation and you say, 'Well, this change will come to an end in two years', then what happens in two years? Do we go back to the previous situation? We have changed this legislation in order, for example, to align Welsh law with international law, but in two years' time, that will come to an end. So, I don't think that makes sense in the context of the regulations. I am aware that the Welsh Government has been using powers under the coronavirus legislation to change primary legislation for short periods of time in order to enable things such as education to continue to happen and to enable the health service to operate during the coronavirus period, and that is an entirely different situation. I don't see how it can work in this instance.
Welsh: Dwi'n credu cyn belled â bod y Bil yn y cwestiwn, does gen i ddim byd i'w ychwanegu at beth mae Paul wedi'i ddweud - yr ail orau, neu'r trydydd orau, neu'r pedwerydd orau fyddai cael cymal machlud. O ran y rheoliadau, dydy e ddim yn gwneud synnwyr i mi i gael cymal machlud yn y rheini, achos bwriad y rheoliadau ydy newid prif Ddeddfau. Os ydych chi'n newid prif Ddeddfau a dŷch chi'n dweud, 'Ond mi fydd y newid yma'n dod i ben ymhen dwy flynedd', beth sy'n digwydd ymhen dwy flynedd? Ydyn ni'n mynd nôl at y sefyllfa lle'r oedden ni? Dŷn ni wedi newid y brif Ddeddf, er enghraifft, er mwyn gwneud deddfwriaeth Cymru yn gydnaws â deddfwriaeth ryngwladol, ond ymhen dwy flynedd, fydd hynny'n dod i ben. Felly, dwi ddim yn credu bod hwnna'n gwneud synnwyr yng nghyd-destun y rheoliadau. Dwi yn ymwybodol bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi bod yn defnyddio pwerau dan y Ddeddf coronafeirws i newid deddfwriaeth gynradd am gyfnodau byr o amser er mwyn galluogi pethau fel addysg i barhau i ddigwydd a'r gwasanaeth iechyd i weithredu adeg coronafeirws, ac mae hwnna'n fater cyfan gwbl wahanol. Dwi ddim yn gweld sut gall e weithio.
English: If we come to Emyr, because he had started to talk about that kind of issue previously in response to Mike's question.
Welsh: Os awn ni at Emyr, oherwydd roedd e wedi dechrau sôn am y math yma o beth yn y cwestiwn gan Mike yn gynharach.
English: I think it would help to - . It would be a help, I believe, if we were to limit the range of changes that could be made rather than trying to formulate a new definition, truth be told. I think that that's where I am on this - I think. I don't think that a definition of tax avoidance within this legislation would take us much further.
Welsh: Wel, dwi'n credu y byddai'n help i - . Byddai'n help, dwi'n credu, ein bod ni yn cyfyngu ar beth yw'r newidiadau sy'n gallu cael eu gwneud yn hytrach nag yn ceisio cael diffiniad newydd, a dweud y gwir. Dwi'n credu mai dyna lle ydw i ar hyn - dwi'n credu. Dwi ddim yn credu byddai diffiniad o osgoi treth o fewn y ddeddfwriaeth yma yn mynd â ni lawer pellach.
English: Of course. In the first instance, I refer to what I mentioned earlier with regard to there not being any limits on the type of situation, and I talked about the example of losing a court case in terms of powers to enter people's premises. So, there is no threshold or boundary on this. Also, this retrospective element is relevant here, but perhaps you would want to discuss that later on, I don't know, but if you like, I will talk a little about that.
Welsh: Wrth gwrs. Yn y lle cyntaf, dwi'n cyfeirio at beth soniais i amdano fe gynnau, ynglŷn â pham nad oes yna ddim ffiniau ar y math o sefyllfa, ac roeddwn i'n sôn am yr enghraifft o golli achos yn ymwneud â gweithredu pwerau mynd i gartrefi pobl. Felly, does dim ffiniau arno fo. Hefyd mae'r elfen ôl-weithredol, retrospective, yn berthnasol fan hyn, ond efallai eich bod chi eisiau trafod honno ar wahân, dwi ddim yn gwybod, ond os liciech chi, fe wnaf i sôn rhywfaint am hynny.
English: We will come to that in a moment -
Welsh: Rydyn ni'n dod at hynny -
English: Okay. So, I think I have dealt with how wide ranging these powers are in the example I gave. I can give you additional examples if you'd like, but I'll leave it there for now.
Welsh: Dyna ni, iawn. Felly, dwi'n credu fy mod i wedi delio â pha mor eang ydy hwn o'r blaen yn yr enghraifft a wnes i ei rhoi. Gallaf i roi mwy o enghreifftiau, ond dwi'n mynd i'w gadael hi yn fanna dwi'n meddwl.
English: You are doing well.
Welsh: Rydych chi'n gwneud yn dda.
English: I think we need to differentiate between two kinds of changes. The first change is the change that doesn't have a detrimental impact on the taxpayer or on the individual or on the people of Wales from the point of view of their situations and their rights. The other kind is what needs to be done that doesn't have that impact but to safeguard the Welsh tax system from, on the one hand, operating contrary to international law, and on the other - . Has the connection been lost?
Welsh: Dwi'n meddwl bod eisiau inni wahaniaethu dau fath o newid. Y newid cyntaf ydy'r newid sydd ddim yn cael effaith andwyol ar y trethdalwr neu ar unigolion neu ar bobl Cymru o safbwynt eu hawliau a'u sefyllfa nhw. A'r math arall ydy'r hyn sydd angen ei wneud heb wneud hynny ond er mwyn diogelu'r system drethiannol Gymreig rhag, ar y naill law, fod yn groes i gyfraith ryngwladol a heb, ar y llall, fod yn - . Ydy'r cysylltiad wedi torri neu ydych chi'n dal i -
English: No, we can hear you.
Welsh: Na, rydyn ni'n clywed.
English: Thank you very much. That's a very comprehensive response. Peter has one or two other questions before moving on, I believe. I'm looking at the clock too. Could we go over five minutes or so just to finish our questions? I'm hoping that witnesses are content to stay five minutes extra. That would be great, thank you. Peter.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr. Mae hwnna'n gynhwysfawr iawn. Mae gan Peter un neu ddau gwestiwn arall, dwi'n meddwl, ac wedyn fe wnawn ni symud ymlaen. Dwi'n edrych ar y cloc hefyd a byddwn i'n gofyn a fyddem ni'n gallu mynd drosodd rhyw bum munud jest er mwyn gallu cwblhau, gan obeithio eich bod chi'n hapus gyda hynny. Byddai hynny'n grêt, diolch. Peter.