English: The brief response is that it does create new rights, but there is room for improvement. So, that's the simple answer. But what I want to be clear on - as I've already mentioned on language use, I want to understand how standards that have already been put in place help Welsh speakers to make more use of the Welsh language. I think that's the aim. Nobody wants to see rights being simply something on paper; we want to see real, practical rights that lead to more use of the Welsh language. That's the main aim in my view. I have had discussions with the commissioner on this, and there is a piece of work on understanding the impact of standards on language use, and also the language journey that I mentioned earlier. So, I'm very eager to get those two things in place. In terms of the system and the process of imposing standards, I think there are many things that we can do to improve that process. The original vision, as you clearly know, was that levels of requirements were placed on particular bodies so that they could go on a journey. There is a tension between that and consistent rights across sectors, which is what the commissioner has historically prioritised, but the upshot of that is a gap between the right and the provision on the ground. So, that's why understanding the real barriers for organisations, companies and institutions in providing Welsh language standards is so very important. I also think that there is work that we can do, and I discussed this with the commissioner, to simplify the process in many ways. There are many things that can't be simplified as they're contained within legislation, but the process of investigations and the work that's done with the sectors does create a substantial risk of duplication. In many organisations, and organisations expected to be subject to standards, the gap can be quite substantial, so I think there's a lot more work that we can do to ensure that that process is simplified.
Welsh: Yr ateb cyflym yw ei fod e'n creu hawliau newydd, ac mae lle i wella sut mae'r safonau yn cael eu gosod. So, dyna'r ateb syml. Beth dwi eisiau bod yn glir - fel roeddwn i'n sôn eisoes ynglŷn â'r defnydd, rwyf eisiau deall sut mae'r safonau sydd eisoes wedi cael eu gosod yn helpu siaradwyr i ddefnyddio mwy o'r Gymraeg. Felly dyna, rwy'n credu, yw'r nod. Does neb yn moyn gweld hawliau ar bapur; mae pawb yn moyn gweld hawliau ymarferol, sy'n arwain at ddefnydd ehangach o'r Gymraeg. Dyna'r prif nod yn fy marn i. Rwyf wedi cael trafodaethau gyda'r comisiynydd am hyn, ac mae'r darn o waith ynglŷn â deall mwy am yr impact ar ddefnydd yn bwysig, a hefyd y daith iaith roeddwn i'n sôn amdani yn gynharach. Felly, rwy'n awyddus iawn i gael y ddau beth hynny wedi eu ffocysu arnyn nhw. O ran y system a'r broses o osod safonau, rwy'n credu bod lot o ffyrdd y gallem ni wella ar y broses honno. Y weledigaeth wreiddiol, fel rŷch chi'n amlwg yn gwybod, oedd bod lefelau o ofyniad yn cael eu dodi ar gyrff penodol fel eu bod nhw'n gallu mynd ar siwrnai ieithyddol, os hoffwch chi. Mae tensiwn rhwng hynny a'r syniad o hawliau cyson ar draws sector, sef beth mae'r comisiynydd yn hanesyddol wedi'i flaenoriaethu, ond canlyniad hyn yw gap rhwng yr hawl a'r ddarpariaeth ar lawr gwlad. Felly, dyna pam mae deall pethau sy'n rhwystredigaethau go iawn i fudiadau a chwmnïau a sefydliadau allu darparu gwasanaethau yn y Gymraeg - dyna pam mae hynny mor bwysig. Rwy'n credu hefyd bod gwaith y gallwn ei wneud, a rwyf wedi trafod hyn gyda'r comisiynydd, i symleiddio'r broses mewn amryw ffyrdd. Mae lot o bethau sydd ddim yn gallu cael eu symleiddio achos maen nhw yn y Ddeddf, ond mae'r broses o ymchwiliadau ac wedyn y gwaith mae'r Llywodraeth yn gorfod ei wneud gyda'r sectorau i gael gwaith mwy manwl yn hynny o beth yn creu risg sylweddol iawn o ddyblygu mewn amryw o gyrff, a'r cyrff sydd yn disgwyl wedyn eu bod nhw'n cael eu darostwng i'r safonau. Ac mae'r gap yn gallu bod yn eithaf sylweddol. Felly rwy'n credu bod lot mwy o waith y gallem ni ei wneud i sicrhau bod y broses honno'n symlach.