techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: The next vote, therefore, is on the motion to agree the First Minister's recommendation to Her Majesty to appoint a Counsel General. I call for a vote on the motion, tabled in the name of Carwyn Jones. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 36, 14 abstentions and none against. Therefore, the motion is agreed.
Welsh: Mae'r bleidlais nesaf, felly, ar y cynnig i dderbyn argymhelliad y Prif Weinidog ar gyfer Ei Mawrhydi i benodi Cwnsler Cyffredinol. Rwy'n galw am bleidlais ar y cynnig, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Carwyn Jones. Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid 36, 14 yn ymatal a neb yn erbyn. Felly, derbyniwyd y cynnig.
English: I'd like to ask a question about the employability programmes - if I can get the words out - which cover a series of programmes, including ReAct, Jobs Growth Wales, traineeships and the Employability Skills programme. The Government has established a board and all of this work in this area is to be reorganised from April 2019 onwards under the Working Wales umbrella. There is quite a fundamental reorganisation happening and, in terms of the budget, the funding is flat. Therefore, is there sufficient investment in this budget line in order to do that developmental work that will be required for these new programmes and plans?
Welsh: Hoffwn i ofyn cwestiwn ynglŷn â'r rhaglenni cyflogadwyedd - i gael yr ynganiad yn gywir, ontefe - sydd yn cyfro cyfres o raglenni yn cynnwys ReAct, Twf Swyddi Cymru, hyfforddiaethau a'r rhaglen Sgiliau Cyflogadwyedd. Mae'r Llywodraeth wedi sefydlu bwrdd a bydd yr holl waith yn y maes yma'n cael ei ad-drefnu, fel rwy'n ei ddeall, o Ebrill 2019 ymlaen o dan ymbarél Cymru'n Gweithio. Y cwestiwn, yn syml iawn, o ran y gyllideb - mae yna ad-drefnu eithaf sylfaenol yn digwydd, ac, eto, mae'r arian yn fflat, felly a oes yna ddigon o fuddsoddiad yn y llinell gyllideb yma er mwyn gwneud y gwaith datblygu, siŵr o fod, y bydd ei angen ar gyfer y cynlluniau newydd?
English: I think it is important that we develop that view to the future. If you look at Jobs Growth Wales, ReAct and so on, it's important that we assimilate those into the new programme. What's important for me is that we shouldn't lose sight of what's happening at the moment in the great effort to look to the future, because there are people doing these traineeships now and we must make sure they don't lose out in this reorganisation. I think that we have sufficient funding for what we have in mind. As you say, this won't be coming in until April 2019, and so we have sufficient time to consider this. Of course, by the time we reach that objective, a new budget will be coming in.
Welsh: Rwy'n meddwl ei bod yn bwysig ein bod ni'n datblygu'r golwg yna ar y dyfodol. Os ŷch chi'n edrych ar Jobs Growth Wales, ReAct a'r rheini, mae'n bwysig ein bod ni'n eu plethu nhw mewn i'r rhaglen newydd. Beth sy'n bwysig i fi yw nad ydym ni'n colli golwg ar beth sy'n digwydd nawr yn yr ymdrech i'w chael hi'n iawn am y dyfodol. Mae yna unigolion allwn ni ddim eu gadael i lawr, ac mae'n rhaid inni sicrhau nad ydyn nhw'n colli mas yn yr ad-drefnu yma. Rydw i yn meddwl bod yna ddigon o gyllid ar gyfer yr hyn sydd gyda ni mewn golwg. Fel rŷch chi yn ei ddweud, nid yw hwn yn dod mewn tan Ebrill 2019, felly mae digon o amser gyda ni i edrych ar hynny. Wrth gwrs, erbyn inni gyrraedd y nod yna, bydd cyllideb newydd yn dod mewn.
English: Good morning. The elephant in the room, it would appear, is the balance between local government budgets and the health budget. And it's a huge challenge, isn't it, to try to maintain and strike the right balance? But, by now, the health budget has seen an increase over five years, whilst the local government budget is back to its 2014-15 levels, according to the WLGA; or back to 2004-05 that was, rather. Is this sustainable? And what's your opinion about this balance, and how we move forward in this challenging situation?
Welsh: Bore da. Yr eliffant yn yr ystafell, mae'n debyg, ydy'r balans rhwng cyllideb llywodraeth leol a chyllideb iechyd. Ac mae'n her anferth, onid ydyw, i drïo cael y balans yn gywir? Ond, erbyn hyn, mae'r gyllideb iechyd wedi gweld cynnydd dros bum mlynedd, tra bod cyllideb llywodraeth leol yn ôl bellach ar ei lefelau 2004-05, yn ôl y WLGA. A ydy hyn yn gynaliadwy? A beth ydy'ch barn chi ynglŷn â'r balans yma a sut rydym ni'n symud ymlaen yn y sefyllfa heriol yna?
English: Well, clearly, as a member of the Government, I agree with the balance that is reflected in this budget. I wasn't the Minister responsible for it at the time, but I was a member of the Government, so I am not going to disagree with the priorities that have led to the current budget. But can I just say this, Siân? We all know that we're all battling as we are to ensure that we have the right balance between priorities, where you and I would probably want to prioritise almost all of these services. I don't want to cut the health service to maintain local services, in the same way that I don't want to cut local services in order to protect the health service. We are all in agreement on that, but the political reality is clear. We have the policy that has failed in Westminster, and that has an impact on how we then implement the Welsh budget. So, I want to see that we continue to ensure that we can defend and protect local services. You are aware of the policy difference between Wales and England, and the huge difference in the kind of financial support that local government has had in Wales. We've not seen anything similar to what has happened on the other side of Offa's Dyke, and I think that all of us appreciate that. But, is it sustainable for the future? I don't know the answer. The WLGA has been clear in their opinion and I accept that. I don't deny that; I do accept that. But, then, I ask the question, 'So, what?' If we believe that, what comes next?
Welsh: Yn amlwg, fel aelod o'r Llywodraeth, rwy'n cytuno â'r cydbwysedd sydd yn cael ei adlewyrchu yn y gyllideb yma. Nid fi oedd y Gweinidog a oedd yn gyfrifol amdano fe ar y pryd, ond rwy'n aelod o'r Llywodraeth, felly nid wyf yn mynd i anghytuno â'r blaenoriaethau sydd wedi arwain at y gyllideb bresennol. Ond a gaf i ddweud hyn, Siân? Rydym ni i gyd yn gwybod ein bod ni i gyd yn brwydro fel rydym ni i sicrhau ein bod ni'n cael y cydbwysedd iawn rhwng blaenoriaethau, ble y byddet ti, siŵr o fod, a minnau, eisiau blaenoriaethu bron pob un o'r gwasanaethau yma. Nid ydw i eisiau torri'r gwasanaeth iechyd er mwyn cynnal gwasanaethau lleol. Yn yr un ffordd, nid ydw i eisiau torri gwasanaethau lleol er mwyn amddiffyn y gwasanaeth iechyd. Rydym ni i gyd yn cytuno ar hynny, ond mae'r realiti gwleidyddol yn glir. Mae gennym ni bolisi sydd wedi methu yn San Steffan, ac mae hynny yn cael impact ar sut rydym ni wedi hynny yn gweithredu y gyllideb Gymreig. So, rydw i eisiau gweld ein bod ni'n parhau i sicrhau ein bod ni'n gallu amddiffyn gwasanaethau lleol. Rydych chi'n ymwybodol o'r gwahaniaeth polisi rhwng Cymru a Lloegr, a'r gwahaniaeth mawr yn y math o gefnogaeth ariannol y mae llywodraeth leol wedi ei gael yng Nghymru. Nid ydym ni wedi gweld dim byd tebyg i beth sydd wedi digwydd yr ochr draw i Glawdd Offa, ac rwy'n credu bod pob un ohonom yn gwerthfawrogi hynny. Ond, a yw e'n gynaliadwy ar gyfer y dyfodol? Nid wyf yn gwybod yr ateb. Mae'r WLGA wedi bod yn glir yn eu barn nhw ac rwy'n derbyn hynny. Nid wyf yn gwadu hynny; rwy'n derbyn hynny. Ond, wedyn, rwy'n gofyn y cwestiwn, 'So, what?' Os ydym ni'n credu hynny, beth sy'n dod nesaf?
English: This isn't a question for you, truth be told; this is a question for the Government. That is, you say that the Government is safeguarding health, but there are health boards that are going into debt. That doesn't happen in local government. Are there efficiency measures that could be taken within the health sector, where there is an expectation for local government to do that? Those are the kinds of questions that we do have to face in going forward. Are you, as local government Minister, able to sympathise with that point of view?
Welsh: Dim cwestiwn i chi ydy hwn mewn ffordd; cwestiwn i'r Llywodraeth ydyw. Hynny yw, rŷch chi'n dweud bod y Llywodraeth yn amddiffyn iechyd, ond mae yna fyrddau iechyd yn mynd i ddyled. Nid ydy hynny'n digwydd mewn llywodraeth leol. A oes yna gamau effeithlonrwydd y gallen nhw ddigwydd o fewn y sector iechyd, lle mae disgwyl i'r llywodraeth leol wneud hynny? Dyna'r math o gwestiynau y mae'n rhaid eu hwynebu wrth symud ymlaen. A ydych chi, fel Gweinidog llywodraeth leol, yn gallu cydymdeimlo efo'r safbwynt yna?
English: Of course I can. There is not enough money in the system. I don't think that there is enough funding in the budget in total. I would never have followed this unwise route that has led us to where we are today, and -
Welsh: Wrth gwrs fy mod i. Nid oes digon o arian yn y system. Nid wyf i'n credu bod yna ddigon o gyllid yn y gyllideb yn ei gyfanrwydd. Ni fuaswn i byth wedi dilyn y llwybr ffôl yma sydd wedi ein harwain ni at ble rydym ni heddiw, a -
English: But that's the reality.
Welsh: Ond dyna ydy'r realiti.
English: We have less money.
Welsh: Mae gennym ni lai o arian.
English: But I have to manage the budget in the context of this reality. There's no point for me to battle against it; I must accept that and then manage what is before me. When you are asked the question about efficiency in the health service, I have no reason to believe that the health boards aren't doing everything they can to ensure that the money is used as efficiently as possible. I don't know that there is any evidence that they are not in reality. The reason, in my opinion, that there are debts in the health service is because of the lack of funding in the whole system, namely in the the Welsh budget. I would have liked to have seen a different fiscal policy followed over the past few years, and I assume that you would have as well.
Welsh: Ond mae'n rhaid i mi wedyn reoli'r gyllideb yng nghyd-destun y realiti yma. Nid oes pwynt i mi frwydro yn ei erbyn; mae'n rhaid i mi dderbyn hynny ac wedyn rheoli beth sydd o'm mlaen i. Pan fyddwch chi'n gofyn y cwestiwn amboutu effeithlonrwydd yn y gwasanaeth iechyd, nid oes gen i reswm i feddwl nad yw'r byrddau iechyd yn gwneud pob dim yn eu gallu nhw i sicrhau bod arian yn cael ei ddefnyddio mewn modd mor effeithiol â phosibl. Nid wyf i'n credu bod yna unrhyw dystiolaeth nad ydyn nhw mewn realiti. Y rheswm, yn fy marn i, mae yna ddyledion yn y gwasanaeth yw oherwydd diffyg arian yn y system yn ei gyfanrwydd, hynny yw yng nghyllideb Cymru. Buaswn i wedi licio gweld polisi cyllidebol gwahanol iawn wedi'i ddilyn dros y blynyddoedd diwethaf ac rwy'n cymryd y buasech chi wedi hefyd.
English: I would, but -
Welsh: Buaswn, ond -
English: The other elephant in the room, it would appear, is the increasing cost of wages and salaries. The payroll is likely to increase, and whilst one would want to see that happening and would want to see employees in the local government sector being paid appropriately, it is going to cause difficulties with regard to local government budgets. What the WLGA says is that that could affect front-line services.
Welsh: Iawn. Yr eliffant arall yn yr ystafell, mae'n debyg, ydy costau cynyddol cyflogau gweithwyr, a'r gyflogres yn debygol o gynyddu. Rŵan, tra bo rhywun eisiau gweld hynny'n digwydd - eisiau gweld gweithwyr yn y sector llywodraeth leol yn cael eu talu'n briodol - mae o'n mynd i achosi trafferthion wedyn i gyllidebau llywodraeth leol onid ydy? Beth mae'r WLGA yn ei ddweud ydy y gallai hynny effeithio ar wasanaethau rheng flaen.
English: I want to see the cap on public service salaries disappear. I want to see it gone. I want to see public sector workers being paid a fair wage for their work. I am quite clear in my opinion on that. This Government has been clear in our correspondence and discussions with the UK Government that they have a responsibility to ensure, especially when we see the current inflation figures, that public sector workers are paid at a fair level. That hasn't happened. It isn't happening and we need to have the budget to enable us to do that. But I want to go further than that. We had a Cabinet meeting with TUC Wales a few weeks ago - some months ago perhaps - and we had a discussion there about how we ensure that Wales is a nation where fair work is acknowledged and that the Welsh Government leads on ensuring that fair work is being acknowledged wherever we are. So, I would support local authorities that pay the living wage to ensure that not only the wages themselves, but the terms of employment are all aligned to ensure that we live according to our principles.
Welsh: Rydw i eisiau gweld y cap ar gyflogau gwasanaethau cyhoeddus yn mynd. Rydw i eisiau ei weld e'n mynd. Rydw i eisiau talu gweithwyr sector cyhoeddus cyflog teg ar gyfer eu gwaith nhw. Rydw i'n hollol glir, yn fy marn i, ar hynny. Mae'r llywodraeth yma wedi bod yn glir yn ein gohebiaeth a thrafodaethau gyda Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig fod ganddyn nhw gyfrifoldeb i sicrhau - ac yn arbennig pan fyddwn ni'n gweld y ffigurau chwyddiant presennol - a bod angen talu gweithwyr cyhoeddus ar lefel deg. Nid yw hynny wedi digwydd. Nid yw e'n digwydd. Mae'n rhaid i ni gael y gyllideb i'n galluogi ni i wneud hynny. Ond rydw i eisiau mynd ymhellach na hynny. Cawsom ni gyfarfod Cabinet gyda TUC Cymru rai wythnosau yn ôl - rhai misoedd yn ôl efallai - ac mi gawsom ni drafodaeth yn fanna amboutu sut rydym yn sicrhau bod Cymru yn genedl ble mae'r gwaith teg yn cael ei gydnabod ac y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn arwain ac yn sicrhau bod gwaith teg yn cael ei gydnabod lle bynnag ydym ni. Felly, buaswn i'n cefnogi awdurdodau lleol sydd yn talu'r cyflog byw i sicrhau bod nid jest y cyflogau eu hun, ond y termau cyflogaeth i gyd yn cyd-fynd i sicrhau ein bod ni'n byw ein hegwyddorion ni.
English: But the other side of the coin is that, to pay for that, it's likely that more front-line services will have to be cut.
Welsh: Ond, ochr arall y geiniog, i dalu am hynny, mae'n debyg y bydd rhaid i fwy o wasanaethau rheng flaen cael eu torri.
English: No, I disagree. The UK Government must accept its responsibility in ensuring a sufficient budget. I don't accept their argument that we have to fund this from the budgets that have already been cut. They have to acknowledge their responsibility in ensuring that we get rid of the cap and that the UK Government pays for that.
Welsh: Na, rwy'n anghytuno. Mae'n rhaid i Lywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig dderbyn ei chyfrifoldeb i sicrhau digon o gyllideb. Nid wyf yn derbyn eu dadl nhw bod rhaid inni ariannu hyn o'r cyllidebau sydd wedi torri yn barod, Mae'n rhaid iddyn nhw gydnabod eu cyfrifoldeb nhw i sicrhau ein bod yn cael gwared ar y cap a bod Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig yn talu am hynny.
English: We had a discussion in the last committee meeting about the additional funding of £42 million for social care, and £62 million for schools. The WLGA agrees that the use of the word 'additional' needs to be questioned. I understand that you have written a letter to us explaining a little bit about that. So, for the record, could you talk a little bit about this additional funding and how you feel that it is, indeed, additional funding?
Welsh: Cawsom ni drafodaeth yn y pwyllgor diwethaf ynglŷn â'r arian ychwanegol - y cyllid ychwanegol - o £42 miliwn ar gyfer gofal cymdeithasol a £62 miliwn ar gyfer ysgolion. Mae'r WLGA yn cytuno bod y defnydd o'r gair 'ychwanegol' - mae eisiau cwestiynu hynny. Rydw i'n deall eich bod chi wedi ysgrifennu llythyr atom ni yn egluro ychydig ar hwn. Felly, ar gyfer y record, a fedrwch chi sôn am yr arian ychwanegol a sut ydych chi'n teimlo bod hwn yn arian ychwanegol?
English: Yes, I do understand that there has been some confusion about this. I don't intend to add to this confusion this morning, so I'll ask one of my officials - Rob - to answer that.
Welsh: Ie, rydw i yn deall bod yna rywfaint o ddrysu wedi bod ar hyn. Nid wyf yn bwriadu, y bore yma, i ychwanegu at y dryswch, felly fe wnaf i ofyn a all un o'm swyddogion - Rob - ateb hynny.
English: May I just ask you about the additional funding for schools and social care? Even though you say that it's not for those purposes specifically, you are asking local government to use the funding for those purposes. So, it's a little bit of a dichotomy, where you say, on the one hand, that you want local government to have flexibility to use the funding in whichever way they want, but then, on the other hand, you say, 'Well, we want you to use the funding in these particular areas'.
Welsh: A gaf i jyst gofyn i chi ynglŷn â'r arian ychwanegol i ysgolion a gofal cymdeithasol? Er eich bod chi'n dweud nad ydyw ar gyfer y pwrpasau hynny yn benodol, mi ydych chi'n gofyn i lywodraeth leol ei ddefnyddio fo ar gyfer y pwrpasau hynny. Felly, mae o'n ryw ychydig bach o dichotomy, lle'r ydych chi'n dweud, ar yr un llaw, eich bod chi eisiau llywodraeth leol fel hyblygrwydd i ddefnyddio'r arian, ond wedyn, ar y llaw arall, rydych chi'n dweud, 'Rydym ni eisiau i chi ddefnyddio hynny yn y meysydd yma'.
English: It's a notional sum. That's what it is. It's a matter for local government to make the decisions, the appropriate decisions, for local government, as I said in the answer to Janet. Then it's a matter for local people to decide whether they accept that decision or not.
Welsh: Mae'n notional sum. Dyna beth yw e. Mae'n fater i lywodraeth leol wneud y penderfyniadau priodol i lywodraeth leol, fel y dywedais i wrth ateb i Janet, ac mae'n fater wedyn i bobl leol benderfynu a ydyn nhw'n derbyn y penderfyniad neu beidio.
English: But it's your leadership -
Welsh: Ond eto eich arweiniad chi ydy -
English: Well, it adds to the kind of information that is available for people. When you were a member in Gwynedd, for example, you would know what the notional sums would be in the budget. If you make a decision to increase how much you are spending in that budget, then it's your decision - or to reduce that - and then people in your ward know exactly the kind of decisions that you have made. I think that adds to the democratic discussion. I don't think that it takes anything away from that. It reflects the kind of information that people should have to make democratic decisions. I think that's fair enough.
Welsh: Wel, mae'n ychwanegu at y math o wybodaeth sydd ar gael i bobl. Pan oeddech chi'n aelod o Wynedd, er enghraifft, mi fuasech chi'n gwybod beth ydy'r notional sums yma yn y gyllideb. Os ydych chi'n gwneud penderfyniad i gynyddu faint rydych chi'n ei wario yn y gyllideb, felly, eich penderfyniad chi ydyw - neu i leihau hynny - ac mae pobl wedyn, yn eich ward, yn gwybod yn union y math o benderfyniadau rydych chi wedi eu gwneud. Rydw i'n credu bod hynny'n ychwanegu at y drafodaeth ddemocrataidd. Nid ydw i'n credu ei fod yn cymryd unrhyw beth i ffwrdd o hynny. Mae'n adlewyrchu'r math o wybodaeth y dylai pobl ei chael i wneud penderfyniadau democrataidd. Rydw i'n credu bod hynny'n ddigon teg.
English: Will you, therefore, be monitoring expenditure in this area - actual expenditure in these two areas?
Welsh: A fyddwch chi, felly, yn monitro'r gwariant yn y maes - y gwariant gwirioneddol yn y ddau faes?
English: Yes, of course. And ensuring that information is available for people.
Welsh: Byddwn. Wrth gwrs y byddwn ni. A sicrhau bod y wybodaeth ar gael i bobl.
English: Yes. One way of easing some of the likely damage caused by universal credit is to argue for making some elements of the administration here in Wales; that is, to devolve elements of administration of universal credit. Are you willing to have a discussion with the Government on that? Then, you would obviously need to agree on a fiscal framework to make sure that it's neutral in terms of cost for Wales. We started this discussion with Carl Sargeant a few weeks ago, and I do believe that it is appropriate for us to take up this conversation again about the possibilities of devolving some small elements of the way that the universal credit will be run in Wales so that we can have a different culture around sanctions and so forth. Are you willing to consider that?
Welsh: Ie. Un ffordd o liniaru peth o'r niwed y mae credyd cynhwysol yn siŵr o'i greu ydy dadlau dros wneud rhai elfennau o'r gweinyddu yma yng Nghymru; hynny yw, datganoli elfennau o weinyddu credyd cyffredinol. A ydych chi'n fodlon cael trafodaeth efo'r Llywodraeth ar hynny? Wedyn, byddai angen, yn amlwg, cytuno ar fframwaith gyllidol i olygu bod y peth yn gost-niwtral i Gymru. Rydym ni wedi dechrau'r drafodaeth yma efo Carl Sargeant ychydig wythnosau yn ôl, ac rydw innau'n credu ei bod o'n briodol inni ailgydio yn y drafodaeth ynglŷn â phosibiliadau o ddatganoli rhai elfennau bychain o'r ffordd y bydd credyd cynhwysol yn cael eu redeg yng Nghymru fel ein bod ni'n gallu cael diwylliant gwahanol o gwmpas sanctions ac yn y blaen. A ydych chi'n fodlon ystyried hynny?
English: I see that you intend to bring a new grant - an early intervention and support grant - forward. I can see the reasoning for bringing different areas under one grant, but it will mean that there's £13 million less in the general pot, moving forward. And there is mention about efficiency savings and so forth, but is it possible to have £13 million in efficiencies, or is this going to mean cuts in some programmes?
Welsh: Rydw i'n gweld eich bod yn bwriadu dod â grant newydd - grant ymyrraeth gynnar atal a chymorth - ymlaen. Fe allaf i weld rhesymeg dod â meysydd gwahanol o dan un grant, ond mae o'n mynd i olygu bod yna £13 miliwn yn llai yn y pot cyffredinol, wrth symud ymlaen. Ac mae yna sôn am arbedion effeithlonrwydd, ac yn y blaen, ond a ydy o'n bosib cael £13 miliwn o arbedion effeithlonrwydd, neu ydy hwn, mewn gwirionedd, yn mynd i olygu toriad mewn rhai o'r rhaglenni?
English: Yes, but, in reality, what can happen when these specific grants are combined is that, at the end of the day, there's a cut in the budget. There's experience of that with other grants.
Welsh: Ocê, ond, mewn gwirionedd, beth sydd yn gallu digwydd pan fo grantiau penodol fel hyn yn cael eu cyfuno ydy, ar ddiwedd y dydd, toriad sydd yna i'r gyllideb. Mae yna brofiad o hynny efo grantiau eraill.
English: Okay. I was referring to one grant, and I know that the education committee's been looking at the education improvement grant, for example, and I would be interested to see how that's been working, in a way. In terms of Supporting People, will that line be earmarked for services associated with housing?
Welsh: Ocê. Un grant roeddwn i yn sôn amdano fo, ac rydw i'n gwybod bod y pwyllgor addysg wedi bod yn edrych ar y grant gwella addysg, er enghraifft, ac mae gennyf ddiddordeb gweld sut mae hwnnw wedi gweithio, mewn ffordd. O ran Cefnogi Pobl ei hun, a fydd y llinell yna yn cael ei chlustnodi ar gyfer gwasanaethau sy'n gysylltiedig efo tai?
English: Good morning, and welcome to this meeting of the Finance Committee. If I may, initially, welcome Jane Hutt, who is here as a substitute currently for Eluned Morgan. We're very grateful to Eluned for her work on the committee, and we welcome Jane who is here as a substitute today, but who perhaps, depending on the decision of the Assembly, will be joining us as a full member soon. So, a warm welcome to Jane. May I remind everyone that there is translation equipment? This is a bilingual meeting and there's translation on channel 1 and amplification on channel 0. And I remind Members to please put their phones and everything else on silent.
Welsh: Bore da, felly, a chroeso i gyfarfod o'r Pwyllgor Cyllid. Os caf i, yn y lle cyntaf, groesawu Jane Hutt fel eilydd, ar hyn o bryd, i Eluned Morgan. Rŷm ni'n ddiolchgar i Eluned am ei gwaith hi ar y pwyllgor, ac yn croesawu Jane fel dirprwy am heddiw, ond efallai, gan ddibynnu ar benderfyniad y Cynulliad, fel aelod llawn o'r pwyllgor maes o law. Croeso mawr i Jane. Atgoffaf bawb fod offer cyfieithu. Mae'n gyfarfod dwyieithog ac mae yna offer cyfieithu - sianel 1 ar gyfer y cyfieithu a sianel 0 ar gyfer jest sain gwreiddiol. Ac atgoffaf Aelodau jest i dawelu eu ffonau ac ati.