English: Llywydd, Plaid Cymru has not sought to amend this Brexit Party motion; it is so far removed from reality that the kindest course of action is to put it out of its misery before it implodes under the weight of its own contradictions. To consider that the Brexit Party only cares about one thing - Brexit - it is really quite astonishing to be confronted with the depth of their ignorance about how it would work. It is a little like seeing a contestant on Mastermind scoring zero points on their self-professed specialist subject. The motion notes that 498 MPs voted to trigger article 50 back in March 2017. That, at least, is correct. That's 498 mainly Tory and Labour MPs who voted in favour of embarking on a voyage of discovery without a map, a compass or any idea of where it was they hoped to reach. [ Interruption.] No, I will not give way, Mark. Plaid Cymru warned at that time that it was a monumental mistake to set in motion a countdown to departure, when the UK Government had no clear set of objectives. The Government knew that there were serious issues with all types of Brexit, so, in the light of that difficulty, they decided not to decide which one to pursue in the hope that nobody would notice. They didn't want to choose a soft Brexit, because it would simply mean that they would have to carry on with EU membership without some of the benefits. They didn't want to choose a hard Brexit, because their own impact assessments clearly showed this would cause severe and long-lasting damage to the economy. And, since there was no goldilocks Brexit to be had, they chose neither, and negotiated a deal that pleased no-one. Now, according to this Brexit Party motion, leaving the EU without a deal on Halloween could reduce the cost of food, clothing and - get this - footwear. Let's let that sink in. We've gone from £350 million extra a week for the NHS to a vague hope that we may get £3.50 off our next pair of shoes. And even this less-than-bold claim doesn't stand up to scrutiny -
Welsh: Lywydd, nid yw Plaid Cymru wedi ceisio diwygio'r cynnig hwn gan Blaid Brexit; mae mor bell oddi wrth realiti fel mai'r peth mwyaf caredig i'w wneud yw ei wared o'i ddioddefaint cyn iddo suddo o dan bwysau ei wrthddywediadau ei hun. Ag ystyried mai un peth yn unig sydd o bwys i Blaid Brexit - Brexit - mae'n gwbl ryfeddol wynebu dyfnder eu hanwybodaeth ynglŷn â sut y byddai'n gweithio. Mae'n weddol debyg i weld cystadleuydd ar Mastermind yn methu sgorio pwynt ar eu pwnc arbenigol addefedig eu hunan. Mae'r cynnig yn nodi bod 498 o ASau wedi pleidleisio dros sbarduno erthygl 50 yn ôl ym mis Mawrth 2017. Mae hynny, o leiaf, yn gywir. Dyna 498 o ASau Torïaidd a Llafur yn bennaf a bleidleisiodd o blaid cychwyn ar daith antur heb fap, cwmpawd nac unrhyw syniad lle roeddent yn gobeithio ei gyrraedd. [ Torri ar draws.] Na, ni wnaf ildio, Mark. Rhybuddiodd Plaid Cymru ar y pryd mai camgymeriad aruthrol oedd gosod y cloc ar gyfer gadael, pan nad oedd gan Lywodraeth y DU set glir o amcanion. Gwyddai'r Llywodraeth fod problemau difrifol gyda phob math o Brexit, felly, yng ngoleuni'r anhawster hwnnw, penderfynasant beidio â phenderfynu pa un i'w ddilyn yn y gobaith na fyddai neb yn sylwi. Nid oeddent am ddewis Brexit meddal, gan y byddai'n golygu'n syml y byddai'n rhaid iddynt barhau ag aelodaeth o'r UE heb rai o'r manteision. Nid oeddent am ddewis Brexit caled, am fod eu hasesiadau effaith eu hunain yn dangos yn glir y byddai hynny'n achosi niwed difrifol dros gyfnod maith i'r economi. A chan nad oedd unrhyw Brexit cyfaddawdol i'w gael, ni wnaethant ddewis yr un o'r ddau, a bwrw iddi i negodi cytundeb nad oedd yn plesio neb. Nawr, yn ôl y cynnig hwn gan Blaid Brexit, gallai gadael yr UE heb gytundeb ar noson Calan Gaeaf ostwng cost bwyd, dillad a - gwrandewch ar hyn - esgidiau. Gadewch inni adael i hynny suddo i mewn. Rydym wedi mynd o £350 miliwn ychwanegol yr wythnos i'r GIG i'r gobaith niwlog y gallwn gael £3.50 oddi ar ein pâr nesaf o esgidiau. Ac nid yw'r honiad llai na beiddgar hwn hyd yn oed yn dal dŵr -