English: Thank you for the comments and the questions. I note everyone's preference to have a debate not a statement, although, actually, to be fair, statements provide more questions from Ministers to answer and more scrutiny in that sense, but these are choices that are made. I broadly share your concern about the impact of austerity on health and health outcomes. I think both Dai Lloyd and Simon Thomas from your party have also indicated their concern and interest in reports and studies that have been done trying to look at the impact of different changes driven by austerity to welfare benefits, for example, and in physical and mental health outcomes as well. They're things that we should continue to be cognisant of - the evidence over and our ability and our choices in what we choose to do in running the health and care system here in Wales and recognising the different drivers of healthcare need in the country. On your three substantive points about fixed-odds betting terminals and also, then, planning, public health, betting shops and hepatitis C - . On fixed-odds betting terminals, the UK Government are out to consultation on this issue, and one of the proposals is that they could actually reduce the maximum stake down to £2. Now, actually, we think that would be a good thing to do, and the chief medical officer has submitted evidence to that effect as part of that consultation. The odd thing is, we're about to get powers in April that will allow this place to reduce the maximum amount - you might want to give local authorities the power to reduce it to £10. So, if we got to the point where we reduce it to £10, there's a potential opportunity to reduce it to £2. Actually, if we're clear that the UK Government are going to act in that way, I think that would be preferable. It would be a consistent system across the UK, and we could indicate that in itself. If that isn't going to happen, then we will of course look to use our powers here in any event. We ought to be really clear about - . There's very clear advice from the chief medical officer about wanting to take a deliberately proactive approach in this area, and I'm sure that I - whether it's me or another Member of this Chamber who's in this particular role - will want to take this seriously and take appropriate action. On betting shops and priority health impact, there's a broader context - not just about betting shops but a range of public health considerations in planning. I'm quite open-minded about how we could do that, but we need to have a conversation across the Government about the planning policy and governance that we currently have - from a national perspective as well as that in place in local authorities. But we should certainly be prepared to again be led by evidence on what we could and should do to deliver a greater public health benefit. On hepatitis C, I know that you, Angela Burns, and Julie Morgan and others have raised the progress that is being made, and, again, I welcome the fact it's been highlighted in the CMO's report about what they're actually doing on hepatitis C. We have a genuine national approach that - . It was really interesting and I've actually - . I don't always read journals and medical publications, but there was real praise for the approach that's been taken here, in professions in England and in Scotland too. They like what we're doing and, in fact, people in England would rather like to have a generally nationally joined-up approach, where they're looking at the most effective medication and not always the most expensive, but it's delivering the real benefit. It's the next stage in eradication in terms of getting to those people who're the hardest to reach, and that, I think, is the point you're making: how do we get to those people who either don't present to healthcare services, present infrequently, or are living chaotic lives, and, actually, even if they may want to, how do you maintain a link with them to actually deal with the challenges that they have? As I set out in a previous statement in this place, we think we're in a good place to carry on making further progress. The ambition remains, though, that we want to be a country that eradicates hepatitis C. We're now at the more difficult end, and it's the best problem to have, but I'm confident that we'll continue to make further progress, and, indeed, whatever progress we do make, we'll update this place and the committee as to the progress that is being made by staff within our national health service.
Welsh: Diolch ichi am y sylwadau a'r cwestiynau. Rwy'n nodi dewis pawb i gael dadl yn lle datganiad, er, mewn gwirionedd, a bod yn deg, mae datganiadau yn rhoi cyfle am fwy o gwestiynau gan Weinidogion i'w hateb a mwy o graffu yn hynny o beth, ond mae'r rhain yn ddewisiadau sy'n cael eu gwneud. Yn fras, rwy'n rhannu eich pryder ynghylch effaith caledi ar iechyd a chanlyniadau iechyd. Rwy'n credu bod Dai Lloyd a Simon Thomas o'ch plaid chi wedi nodi eu pryder hefyd a'u diddordeb mewn adroddiadau ac astudiaethau sydd wedi'u gwneud i geisio edrych ar effaith y gwahanol newidiadau i fudd-daliadau lles yn sgil caledi, er enghraifft, ac mewn canlyniadau iechyd corfforol a meddwl hefyd. Maen nhw'n bethau y dylem ni barhau i fod yn ymwybodol ohonynt - y dystiolaeth ar gyfer a'n gallu a'n dewisiadau o ran beth yr ydym yn dewis ei wneud i redeg y system iechyd a gofal yma yng Nghymru a chydnabod y gwahanol ffactorau sy'n effeithio ar anghenion gofal iechyd yn y wlad. O ran eich tri phwynt annibynnol ynghylch terfynellau betio ods sefydlog a hefyd, wedyn, cynllunio, iechyd y cyhoedd, siopau betio a hepatitis C - . O ran terfynellau betio ods sefydlog, mae Llywodraeth y DU yn ymgynghori ar y mater hwn, ac un o'r cynigion yw y gallent mewn gwirionedd leihau'r budd mwyaf posibl i £2. Nawr, rydym ni'n credu y byddai hynny'n beth da i'w wneud, ac mae'r prif swyddog meddygol wedi cyflwyno tystiolaeth i'r perwyl hwnnw yn rhan o'r ymgynghoriad hwnnw. Y peth rhyfedd yw, ein bod ni ar fin cael pwerau ym mis Ebrill a fydd yn caniatáu'r lle hwn i ostwng y swm uchaf - efallai yr hoffech chi roi'r pŵer i awdurdodau lleol ei ostwng i £10. Felly, os byddem yn cyrraedd y pwynt pan fyddwn yn ei ostwng i £10, ceir cyfle posibl i'w ostwng i £2. Mewn gwirionedd, os ydym yn glir bod Llywodraeth y DU yn mynd i weithredu yn y modd hwnnw, byddai hynny yn well yn fy marn i. Byddai'n system gyson ledled y DU, a gallem ddangos hynny ynddo'i hun. Os na fydd hynny'n digwydd, byddwn wrth gwrs yn ceisio defnyddio ein pwerau yma beth bynnag. Dylem ni fod yn glir iawn ynghylch - . Ceir cyngor clir iawn gan y prif swyddog meddygol ynglŷn â dymuno mynd ati'n fwriadol rhagweithiol yn y maes hwn, ac rwy'n siŵr y byddaf i - pa un ai fi neu Aelod arall o'r Siambr hon sydd yn y swydd benodol hon - yn dymuno ystyried hyn o ddifrif a chymryd camau priodol. Mae cyd-destun ehangach i siopau betio ac effaith iechyd blaenoriaethol - nid yn unig o ran siopau betio ond o ran amrywiaeth o ystyriaethau ynglŷn ag iechyd y cyhoedd wrth gynllunio. Mae gen i feddwl eithaf agored ynglŷn â sut y gallem ni wneud hynny, ond mae angen i'r Llywodraeth gyfan gael trafodaeth ynghylch y polisi cynllunio a'r drefn lywodraethol sydd gennym ni ar hyn o bryd - o safbwynt cenedlaethol yn ogystal â'r hyn sydd ar waith mewn awdurdodau lleol. Ond dylem yn sicr fod yn barod i gael ein harwain unwaith eto gan dystiolaeth o ran beth y gallem ni ac y dylem ni ei wneud i gynyddu iechyd y cyhoedd. O ran hepatitis C, gwn eich bod chi, Angela Burns, a Julie Morgan ac eraill wedi sôn am y cynnydd sy'n cael ei wneud, ac, unwaith eto, rwy'n croesawu'r ffaith y tynnwyd sylw at beth maen nhw'n ei wneud mewn gwirionedd ar gyfer hepatitis C yn adroddiad y prif swyddog meddygol. Mae gennym ni ddull gwirioneddol genedlaethol o weithio - . Roedd yn ddiddorol iawn ac rwyf i mewn gwirionedd - . Nid wyf i bob amser yn darllen cylchgronau a chyhoeddiadau meddygol, ond cafwyd canmoliaeth wirioneddol i'r dull a ddefnyddir yma, mewn proffesiynau yn Lloegr a'r Alban hefyd. Maen nhw'n hoffi beth rydym yn ei wneud ac, yn wir, byddai'n well gan bobl yn Lloegr ffordd o weithio gydgysylltiedig gyffredinol genedlaethol, sy'n edrych ar y feddyginiaeth fwyaf effeithiol ac nid bob amser y drytaf, ond sy'n arwain at fudd gwirioneddol. Hwn yw'r cam nesaf tuag at ddileu'r afiechyd o ran cyrraedd y bobl hynny sydd anoddaf eu cyrraedd, a hynny, rwy'n credu, yw'r pwynt yr ydych yn ei wneud: sut ydym ni'n cyrraedd y bobl hynny sydd naill ai ddim yn cyflwyno'u hunain i wasanaethau gofal iechyd, yn cyflwyno'u hunain yn anaml, neu yn byw bywydau anhrefnus, ac, mewn gwirionedd, hyd yn oed os yr hoffan nhw wneud hynny, sut ydych chi'n cadw cysylltiad â nhw i ymdrin â'r heriau sydd ganddyn nhw? Fel y nodais mewn datganiad blaenorol yn y lle hwn, rydym ni o'r farn ein bod ni mewn sefyllfa dda i barhau i wneud rhagor o gynnydd. Mae'r uchelgais yn parhau, fodd bynnag, i fod yn wlad sy'n dileu hepatitis C. Rydym ni erbyn hyn wedi cyrraedd y rhan anoddach o hynny, a hon yw'r broblem orau i'w chael, ond rwy'n ffyddiog y byddwn yn parhau i wneud cynnydd, ac, yn wir, pa gynnydd bynnag a wnawn, byddwn yn rhoi'r wybodaeth ddiweddaraf yn y lle hwn ac yn y pwyllgor am y cynnydd a wneir gan staff yn ein gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol.