techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you very much, Presiding Officer. It's become more and more apparent in light of the report of the auditor general, for example, and then the evidence gathered by the Public Accounts Committee recently, that one of the cornerstones of the procurement policy of the Welsh Government, namely the National Procurement Service, is underachieving to say the least. The target, if Members recall, back in 2012, when the service was created, was to generate £25 million of savings on expenditure of £4.3 billion within the public sector. But, in the most recent years for which we have figures in the auditor's report, only £15 million has been delivered on a spend of £6 billion. We also discover in the report that only 19 per cent of members of the service have declared that they are making financial savings, and only a third of all local authorities are content with the service. And even the Welsh Government are saying that they are dissatisfied with the service that they themselves have created. Isn't it clear, Cabinet Secretary, that Welsh Government procurement policy is currently failing?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. Mae wedi dod yn fwyfwy amlwg yn sgil adroddiad yr archwilydd cyffredinol, er enghraifft, ac wedyn y dystiolaeth y mae'r Pwyllgor Cyfrifon Cyhoeddus wedi ei derbyn yn ddiweddar, bod un o gonglfeini polisi caffael Llywodraeth Cymru, sef y Gwasanaeth Caffael Cenedlaethol, yn tangyflawni a dweud y lleiaf. Hynny yw, y targed, os ydy'r Aelodau'n ei gofio, yn ôl yn 2012, pan grëwyd y gwasanaeth, oedd creu £25 miliwn o arbedion ar wariant o £4.3 biliwn o fewn y sector cyhoeddus. Ond, yn y flwyddyn mwyaf cyfredol sy'n cael ei dangos yn adroddiad yr archwilydd, dim ond £15 miliwn sydd yna, felly 60 y cant, ar wariant o £6 biliwn, felly. Ac, wrth gwrs, rŷm ni'n darganfod hefyd yn yr adroddiad mai dim ond 19 y cant o aelodau'r gwasanaeth sydd yn datgan eu bod nhw yn cael cynilon ariannol a thraean, dim ond traean, o'r holl awdurdodau lleol sydd yn fodlon gyda'r gwasanaeth. Ac mae hyd yn oed Llywodraeth Cymru yn dweud eu bod nhw'n anfodlon gyda'r gwasanaeth y maen nhw eu hunain wedi ei greu. Onid yw e'n glir, Ysgrifennydd, fod polisi caffael Llywodraeth Cymru ar hyn o bryd yn methu?
English: Well, Llywydd, I have welcomed the work done by the Auditor General for Wales in relation to procurement, and I welcome the work that the Public Accounts Committee has done in this field as well. It is because of concerns about the National Procurement Service, not simply the service itself, but about the changing context within which such a service has to operate - Brexit, ongoing austerity, emerging models of regional working, for example - that back in September I announced that we were undertaking a review of the service. Now, since then, as Adam Price has said, information has emerged about the extent to which the NPS has been able to reach the benchmarks that were originally set out for it and about the level of confidence that it has commanded amongst those who use it. That's why a plan to refocus NPS and Value Wales is important. That's why I am keen to press on with it. We need a service that is able to use the power of procurement to the advantage of the Welsh economy to the maximum extent, but it has to command the confidence of its key stakeholders, and there are changes that are needed to make sure that that can happen.
Welsh: Wel, Lywydd, rwyf wedi croesawu'r gwaith a wnaed gan Archwilydd Cyffredinol Cymru mewn perthynas â chaffael, a chroesawaf y gwaith a wnaed gan y Pwyllgor Cyfrifon Cyhoeddus yn y maes hwn hefyd. O ganlyniad i bryderon ynglŷn â'r Gwasanaeth Caffael Cenedlaethol, nid y gwasanaeth ei hun, ond y cyd-destun newidiol y mae'n rhaid i wasanaeth o'r fath weithredu ynddo - Brexit, cyni parhaus, modelau newydd ar gyfer gweithio'n rhanbarthol, er enghraifft - cyhoeddais yn ôl ym mis Medi ein bod yn cynnal adolygiad o'r gwasanaeth. Nawr, ers hynny, fel y dywedodd Adam Price, mae gwybodaeth wedi dod i'r amlwg ynglŷn ag i ba raddau y mae'r Gwasanaeth Caffael Cenedlaethol wedi gallu cyrraedd y meincnodau a nodwyd ar ei gyfer yn wreiddiol ac ynglŷn â lefel yr hyder y mae wedi'i ennyn ymysg y rhai sy'n ei ddefnyddio. Dyna pam fod cynllun i ailffocysu'r Gwasanaeth Caffael Cenedlaethol a Gwerth Cymru yn bwysig. Dyna pam fy mod yn awyddus i fwrw ymlaen ag ef. Mae arnom angen gwasanaeth sy'n gallu defnyddio grym caffael er budd economi Cymru i'r graddau mwyaf posibl, ond mae'n rhaid iddo ennyn hyder ei randdeiliaid allweddol, ac mae angen gwneud newidiadau i sicrhau y gall hynny ddigwydd.
English: One of the main weaknesses as I see it in terms of procurement at the moment in Wales is a lack of staff with appropriate qualifications and the ability of public bodies to retain those experienced staff. In 2012, Cardiff University said in a report by Professor Kevin Morgan that there was a serious skills shortage at the heart of the public sector in Wales in relation to public procurement. He estimated that there was a need for an official with a chartered institute qualification for every £15 million of public spend. Now, the Welsh Government have gone a step further than that, of course, and followed the recommendations made by McClelland, and in their policy on public procurement they talked of a figure of £10 million of expenditure across the public sector as the benchmark. On that basis, of course, we are some 274 professional procurement managers short in Wales, so what actions are the Government taking to recruit and train more staff and experts in procurement?
Welsh: Un o brif wendidau, fel y'i welaf i, caffael ar hyn o bryd yng Nghymru yw'r diffyg staff â chymwysterau priodol a'r gallu i gyrff cyhoeddus gadw'r staff profiadol hynny. Yn 2012, dywedodd Prifysgol Caerdydd, mewn adroddiad gan yr Athro Kevin Morgan, fod prinder sgiliau difrifol wrth galon y sector cyhoeddus yng Nghymru yng nghyswllt â chaffael cyhoeddus. Roedd e wedyn yn amcangyfrif bod angen swyddog gyda chymhwyster sefydliad siartredig prynu a chyflenwi i bob £15 miliwn o wariant cyhoeddus. Nawr, roedd Llywodraeth Cymru wedi mynd un cam ymhellach na hynny wrth gwrs a dilyn argymhelliad McClelland, ac yn eu polisi nhw ar gaffael cyhoeddus yn sôn am ffigur o £10 miliwn o wariant ar draws y sector cyhoeddus fel y meincnod. Wel, ar y sail honno, wrth gwrs, rŷm ni ryw 274 o reolwyr caffael proffesiynol yn brin yng Nghymru, felly pa gamau gweithredol y mae'r Llywodraeth yn eu cymryd i recriwtio a hyfforddi mwy o staff ac arbenigwyr caffael?
English: Well, can I begin by recognising the point that the Member makes? The need for proper capacity and capability in procurement is a challenge. I talked to Kevin Morgan myself about it, and the Member was right that the McClelland methodology does suggest a deficit in Wales of the order that he identified. Now, we've already done some things about this in Wales. We've had the Home Grown Talent project, which has successfully brought new people into the system. We are committed to increasing the pool of procurement professionals in Wales. We're working with schools and colleges to raise the awareness of procurement as a desirable profession. But we also need to work with public sector organisations for them to give the sense of status and recognition to procurement professionals that they do to others. Too often, it seems to me, public organisations regard procurement as a rather handle-turning exercise, where you don't think of the people involved in it as having much of a cutting-edge contribution to the work of the organisation. But we know - some of the points Adam Price has already made - about the ability of procurement to drive value for the public, and not just value, but activity in terms of employment and community benefits and so on. The status of the profession needs to be recognised better, and that's part of the work that we want to do to try to address the recruitment and retention issues that Adam Price has identified.
Welsh: Wel, a gaf fi ddechrau drwy gydnabod y pwynt a wnaeth yr Aelod? Mae'r angen am gapasiti a galluogrwydd priodol ym maes caffael yn her. Siaradais â Kevin Morgan ynglŷn â hyn, ac roedd yr Aelod yn llygad ei le wrth nodi bod methodoleg McClelland yn awgrymu diffyg yng Nghymru i'r graddau a nodwyd ganddo. Nawr, rydym eisoes wedi gwneud rhai pethau am hyn yng Nghymru. Cawsom brosiect Doniau Cymru, sydd wedi llwyddo i ddod â phobl newydd i mewn i'r system. Rydym wedi ymrwymo i gynyddu'r gronfa o weithwyr caffael proffesiynol yng Nghymru. Rydym yn gweithio gydag ysgolion a cholegau i godi ymwybyddiaeth o gaffael fel proffesiwn dymunol. Ond mae angen inni weithio gyda sefydliadau'r sector cyhoeddus hefyd er mwyn iddynt roi'r un ymdeimlad o statws a chydnabyddiaeth i weithwyr caffael proffesiynol ag y gwnânt i eraill. Yn rhy aml, ymddengys i mi, mae sefydliadau cyhoeddus yn ystyried caffael yn ymarfer troi handlen braidd, lle nad ydych yn meddwl bod y bobl sy'n ymwneud â chaffael yn gwneud cyfraniad arloesol i waith y sefydliad. Ond gwyddom - rhai o'r pwyntiau a wnaed eisoes gan Adam Price - am allu caffael i hybu gwerth ar gyfer y cyhoedd, ac nid gwerth yn unig, ond gweithgarwch o ran cyflogaeth a buddion cymunedol ac ati. Mae angen gwell cydnabyddiaeth i statws y proffesiwn, ac mae hynny'n rhan o'r gwaith rydym yn awyddus i'w wneud i geisio mynd i'r afael â'r materion recriwtio a chadw staff a nodwyd gan Adam Price.
English: Can I turn, finally, to a specific example, which I think raises further questions on whether or not NPS and the wider framework of procurement policy is fit for purpose? NPS recently awarded a three-year contract called Arbed 3, which is an all-Wales contract to insulate thousands of homes, to the Scottish based company, Everwarm, which is itself a subsidiary of a much larger firm called Lakehouse, based in Essex, I believe - a company that's been likened to Carillion in terms of its aggressive bidding for public sector contracts based on its ability to cut costs. This has led to questions about standards and probity, and it should be noted that this was the very same company that held the contract for fitting the fire alarms at Grenfell Tower. Now, you, in the statement that you referred to, Cabinet Secretary, last year on repositioning Welsh Government procurement policy, did emphasise social value. Does this commitment sit comfortably with NPS's decision to appoint a firm that has been the subject of a string of negative reports, from profit warnings to fraud allegations and safety concerns - compared to Melin Homes, which, together with other Welsh-based partners, had, in the previous programme, ensured 100 per cent procurement from Welsh SMEs? Instead of repositioning Welsh Government procurement policy, don't we need a complete rethink?
Welsh: A gaf fi droi, i gloi, at enghraifft benodol, gan y credaf ei bod yn codi cwestiynau pellach ynglŷn ag a yw'r Gwasanaeth Caffael Cenedlaethol a fframwaith ehangach polisi caffael yn addas at y diben? Yn ddiweddar, dyfarnodd y Gwasanaeth Caffael Cenedlaethol gontract tair blynedd o'r enw Arbed 3, sef contract Cymru gyfan i inswleiddio miloedd o gartrefi, i gwmni o'r Alban, Everwarm, sy'n is-gwmni i gwmni llawer mwy o'r enw Lakehouse, o Essex, rwy'n credu - cwmni sydd wedi cael ei gymharu â Carillion oherwydd ei ffyrnigrwydd wrth wneud cynigion am gontractau yn y sector cyhoeddus ar sail ei allu i dorri costau. Mae hyn wedi arwain at gwestiynau ynglŷn â safonau ac uniondeb, a dylid nodi mai'r cwmni hwn oedd yn gyfrifol am y contract ar gyfer gosod larymau tân yn Nhŵr Grenfell. Nawr, yn y datganiad y cyfeirioch chi ato, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, ar addasu polisi caffael Llywodraeth Cymru y llynedd, roeddech yn pwysleisio gwerth cymdeithasol. A yw'r ymrwymiad hwn yn cydweddu â phenderfyniad y Gwasanaeth Caffael Cenedlaethol i benodi cwmni a fu'n destun cyfres o adroddiadau negyddol, o rybuddion elw i honiadau o dwyll a phryderon ynghylch diogelwch - o gymharu â Cartrefi Melin, a lwyddodd, ynghyd â phartneriaid eraill yng Nghymru, yn y rhaglen flaenorol, i sicrhau cyfraddau caffael o 100 y cant gan fusnesau bach a chanolig Cymru? Yn hytrach nag addasu polisi caffael Llywodraeth Cymru, onid oes angen inni ailfeddwl yn llwyr ynglŷn â hyn?
English: Well, I thank the Member for raising that point, and it was raised in the Chamber yesterday by Mark Isherwood during business questions, as well. I've written, Llywydd, today, to all Assembly Members who have corresponded with me on this issue. Because there will be Members here who won't have received those replies, I wonder if I might just read the final two paragraphs of that letter, just so that I put the current position on the record for Members to know. So, the letter sets out the process that led to the identification of a successful bidder. It then says that, under the Public Contract Regulations 2015, we are required to allow a mandatory minimum 10-day standstill period. During the initial period, one of the bidders formally raised a number of points of clarification via their legal advisers and asked that the Welsh Government extend the standstill period. That standstill period has been extended. It will now last until 30 April and that will provide time to enable a clear and comprehensive consideration of the points that have been raised as part of this exercise. Members will understand that, with that issue under further consideration, it wouldn't be right for me to comment further on the outcome of the procurement, but I will make a further statement when the standstill process comes to an end.
Welsh: Wel, diolch i'r Aelod am godi'r pwynt hwnnw, ac fe'i codwyd hefyd yn y Siambr ddoe gan Mark Isherwood yn ystod y cwestiynau busnes. Lywydd, heddiw fe ysgrifennais at bob un o Aelodau'r Cynulliad sydd wedi gohebu â mi ar y mater hwn. Gan na fydd rhai o'r Aelodau yma wedi cael yr atebion hynny, tybed a gaf fi ddarllen dau baragraff olaf y llythyr hwnnw, fel y gallaf gofnodi'r safbwynt cyfredol ar gyfer yr Aelodau. Felly, mae'r llythyr yn nodi'r broses a arweiniodd at nodi cynigydd llwyddiannus. Dywed wedyn, o dan Reoliadau Cytundebau Cyhoeddus 2015, ei bod yn ofynnol inni ganiatáu cyfnod segur gorfodol o 10 niwrnod fan lleiaf. Yn ystod y cyfnod cychwynnol, cododd un o'r cynigwyr nifer o bwyntiau o esboniad yn ffurfiol drwy eu cynghorwyr cyfreithiol, a gofynasant i Lywodraeth Cymru ymestyn y cyfnod segur. Mae'r cyfnod segur hwnnw wedi cael ei ymestyn. Bellach, bydd yn para tan 30 Ebrill a bydd hynny'n rhoi amser i ganiatáu ystyriaeth glir a chynhwysfawr o'r pwyntiau a godwyd fel rhan o'r ymarfer hwn. Bydd yr Aelodau'n deall, gyda'r mater hwnnw o dan ystyriaeth bellach, na fyddai'n briodol imi wneud sylwadau pellach ar ganlyniad y broses gaffael, ond byddaf yn gwneud datganiad pellach pan ddaw proses y cyfnod segur i ben.
English: Can I thank the Member for that question? And no doubt I will find my answer to it any second now. Llywydd, the local government and public services portfolio will spend £5.4 billion in 2018-19, comprising £3.7 billion in revenue, £209 million in capital and £1.1 billion in annually managed expenditure. That investment covers a range of vitally important areas, including housing, homelessness, childcare and the council tax reduction scheme.
Welsh: A gaf fi ddiolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn? Diau y caf i'r ateb iddo unrhyw eiliad nawr. Lywydd, bydd y portffolio llywodraeth leol a gwasanaethau cyhoeddus yn gwario £5.4 biliwn yn 2018-19, yn cynnwys £3.7 biliwn mewn refeniw, £209 miliwn mewn cyfalaf ac £1.1 biliwn mewn gwariant a reolir yn flynyddol. Mae'r buddsoddiad hwnnw yn cwmpasu ystod o feysydd hanfodol bwysig, gan gynnwys tai, digartrefedd, gofal plant a chynllun lleihau'r dreth gyngor.
English: Okay. Thank you for that answer. There are financial implications to Government spending if a proposed prison in Port Talbot or elsewhere in Wales is to go ahead. Have you made any analysis of the impact in terms of how you would need to allocate extra resources to departments? I understand the public service Cabinet Secretary made a statement during recess, where the impacts on other aspects of public services and policy were raised as part of the reason for announcing a delay. So, I've received, myself, some information that shows that there is considerable impact on public resources relating to existing prisons, so I would like to ask: have you given any thought, specifically, to the impact on public services in south Wales and how you would need to potentially change the budget if there would be a need to do so?
Welsh: Iawn. Diolch am eich ateb. Byddai goblygiadau ariannol i wariant y Llywodraeth pe bai carchar arfaethedig ym Mhort Talbot neu mewn man arall yng Nghymru yn mynd yn ei flaen. A ydych wedi gwneud unrhyw ddadansoddiad o'r effaith o ran sut y byddai angen i chi ddyrannu adnoddau ychwanegol i adrannau? Deallaf fod Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros wasanaethau cyhoeddus wedi gwneud datganiad yn ystod y toriad, lle y nodwyd yr effeithiau ar agweddau eraill ar wasanaethau cyhoeddus a pholisi fel rhan o'r rheswm dros gyhoeddi gohiriad. Felly, rwyf wedi cael peth gwybodaeth sy'n dangos effaith sylweddol ar adnoddau cyhoeddus mewn perthynas â charchardai sy'n bodoli eisoes, felly hoffwn ofyn: a ydych wedi rhoi unrhyw ystyriaeth, yn benodol, i'r effaith ar wasanaethau cyhoeddus yn ne Cymru a sut y byddai angen ichi newid y gyllideb, o bosibl, pe bai angen gwneud hynny?
English: I thank her for that further question. I have, of course, seen the statement on justice policy put out by my colleague Alun Davies during the recess. Whenever there are developments in this field, we work closely with the Ministry of Justice to make sure that, if non-devolved activity is being developed in Wales, the necessary resources come with it. We do that, however, at the point when there is a specific proposal around which those discussions could take place. So, the general answer to the Member's question is, were there to be any proposals, of course those discussions would happen, but they don't happen in this specific instance because there is nothing on the table around which such discussions could be focused.
Welsh: Diolch iddi am ei chwestiwn pellach. Wrth gwrs, gwelais y datganiad ar bolisi cyfiawnder a wnaed gan fy nghyd-Aelod Alun Davies yn ystod y toriad. Pa bryd bynnag y ceir datblygiadau yn y maes hwn, rydym yn gweithio'n agos gyda'r Weinyddiaeth Gyfiawnder i sicrhau, os yw gweithgarwch heb ei ddatganoli yn cael ei ddatblygu yng Nghymru, y daw'r adnoddau angenrheidiol gydag ef. Rydym yn gwneud hynny, fodd bynnag, ar yr adeg pan wneir cynnig penodol y gellir cynnal y trafodaethau hynny yn ei gylch. Felly, yr ateb cyffredinol i gwestiwn yr Aelod yw, pe bai unrhyw gynigion, wrth gwrs y byddai'r trafodaethau hynny'n mynd rhagddynt, ond nid ydynt yn mynd rhagddynt yn yr achos penodol hwn, gan nad oes unrhyw beth ar y bwrdd y gellir canolbwyntio arno mewn trafodaethau o'r fath.
English: Cabinet Secretary, around £100 million of grants were dehypothecated in this year's budget for local authorities and local government, and, of course, we see that as a positive move forward. Obviously, the costs of administration are very high. However, a number of local authorities have raised serious concerns that the £13 million that was previously allocated for the minority ethnic, Gypsy/Traveller and Roma element of the educational improvement grant was actually withheld and not actually passed on to this particular budget line. The education Secretary has since admitted error in this regard, thereby transferring this extra funding to make up for the shortfall. However, once again, our more rural local authorities were completely excluded from this correction. Cabinet Secretary, this does not inspire confidence in the budget setting of the Welsh Labour Government. So, therefore, what assurances can you provide me with that any dehypothecated funding going forward in the future will reach those authorities and the budgets that they're intended to do so?
Welsh: Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, dadneilltuwyd oddeutu £100 miliwn o grantiau yn y gyllideb ar gyfer awdurdodau lleol a llywodraeth leol eleni, ac wrth gwrs, rydym yn ystyried hwnnw'n gam cadarnhaol ymlaen. Yn amlwg, mae'r costau gweinyddol yn uchel iawn. Fodd bynnag, mae nifer o awdurdodau lleol wedi mynegi pryderon difrifol fod y £13 miliwn a ddyrannwyd yn flaenorol ar gyfer elfen leiafrifoedd ethnig, Sipsiwn/Teithwyr a Roma y grant gwella addysg wedi'i ddal yn ôl mewn gwirionedd a heb ei drosglwyddo i'r llinell gyllideb benodol hon. Ers hynny, mae'r Ysgrifennydd addysg wedi cyfaddef bod gwall wedi digwydd yn hyn o beth, ac o ganlyniad wedi trosglwyddo'r cyllid ychwanegol hwn i wneud iawn am y diffyg. Fodd bynnag, unwaith eto, hepgorwyd ein hawdurdodau lleol mwy gwledig yn llwyr o'r cywiriad hwn. Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, nid yw hyn yn ennyn hyder yng ngallu Llywodraeth Lafur Cymru i bennu'r gyllideb. Felly, pa sicrwydd y gallwch ei roi imi y bydd unrhyw gyllid a ddadneilltuir yn y dyfodol yn cyrraedd yr awdurdodau hynny a'r cyllidebau y bwriedir iddynt eu cyrraedd?
English: Well, I'm grateful for what the Member said at the start of her question about her support for the general principle of dehypothecation, and I was very keen, in this budget round for this year, to take a step forward in that, because, at times when local authority budgets are under such pressure, we respond to the case they make to us that, if money goes into the revenue support grant, they can make more flexible, and therefore more effective and more efficient, use of it. In relation to the minority ethnic achievement grant, we have come to an agreement, Llywydd, with the Welsh Local Government Association on that matter. I have provided an additional £5 million from central funds to assist with the education of children from those backgrounds, and my colleague Kirsty Williams has added a further £2.5 million to that sum to make sure that future development of this provision on a regional footing can be carried out. We were glad to reach that agreement with the WLGA. As we move further grants into the RSG, I accept the general point the Member made - that that has to be done carefully and has to be done with thorough discussion in advance to make sure that the particular strand in the budget formula that we use means that money ends up in the places where it is most needed.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n ddiolchgar am yr hyn a ddywedodd yr Aelod ar ddechrau ei chwestiwn ynglŷn â'i chefnogaeth i egwyddor gyffredinol dadneilltuo, ac roeddwn yn awyddus iawn, yn y cylch cyllidebol ar gyfer y flwyddyn hon, i gymryd cam ymlaen yn hynny o beth, oherwydd, ar adeg pan fo cyllidebau awdurdodau lleol o dan y fath bwysau, rydym yn ymateb i'r sylwadau a wnânt inni, os aiff arian i mewn i'r grant cynnal refeniw, y gallant wneud defnydd mwy hyblyg, a mwy effeithiol ac effeithlon felly, ohono. O ran y grant cyflawniad lleiafrifoedd ethnig, rydym wedi dod i gytundeb, Lywydd, gyda Chymdeithas Llywodraeth Leol Cymru ar y mater hwnnw. Rwyf wedi darparu £5 miliwn ychwanegol o gronfeydd canolog i helpu gydag addysg plant o'r cefndiroedd hynny, ac mae fy nghyd-Aelod Kirsty Williams wedi ychwanegu £2.5 miliwn ychwanegol at y swm hwnnw i sicrhau y gellir datblygu'r ddarpariaeth hon ar sail ranbarthol yn y dyfodol. Roeddem yn falch o ddod i'r cytundeb hwnnw gyda CLlLC. Wrth inni symud rhagor o grantiau i'r grant cynnal refeniw, rwy'n derbyn y pwynt cyffredinol a wnaed gan yr Aelod - fod yn rhaid gwneud hynny'n ofalus a thrwy drafodaeth drwyadl ymlaen llaw er mwyn sicrhau bod yr elfen benodol honno yn y fformiwla gyllido a ddefnyddiwn yn golygu bod yr arian hwnnw'n cyrraedd y mannau lle mae ei angen fwyaf.