English: And, again, we've seen Labour politicians in Westminster today saying that the UK Government has to respect motions and amendments to the motion that are to be tabled next week. Well, surely the Welsh Government should then respect the same principle here. The policy has been decided, and this isn't a semantic difference, as the First Minister argued yesterday, as far as the customs union is concerned. Continuing within the EU customs union would mean that exporters could continue to trade with the European Union as they do now, without having to face tariffs or non-tariff barriers. The other option, of an alternative customs union, would place us in the same position as Turkey, having to steer through new, expensive barriers, such as rules of origin rules, in order to continue to export to the European Union. And, of course, that customs union for Turkey doesn't include agriculture. Therefore, that's why that difference is so crucial, and the fact that we have passed a motion, and now the Welsh Government is going back on its word on that, according to what has been said today, is a cause of great regret for me, as we are in a critical situation now where there should be clarity from the Welsh Government as to its stance. So, may I ask the First Minister: why is the Welsh Government's policy, according to what he has said this afternoon, on this issue different to the policy that was agreed by this Parliament with the support of the Welsh Government on 4 December? And why do you believe that leaving the customs union, which already exists, is better for Welsh exporters, given all of the reasons that I have outlined? Finally, the motion that was approved also called for the extension of article 50 unconditionally, unlike what you have said in your statement today. You said that you were doing everything you could to avoid this catastrophe that we are facing. If so, why have so many Labour Members had to write to you to do more - to plead not only with the Prime Minister in Westminster, but also to plead with the leader of your own party, as we are now facing a situation within just a few weeks of this catastrophe? And the clearer option, of course, is a people's vote. Why can't you show leadership in this regard and avoid what you quite rightly describe as something that could be very destructive to the people of Wales?
Welsh: Ac, eto, rŷm ni wedi gweld gwleidyddion Llafur yn San Steffan heddiw yn dweud bod yn rhaid i Lywodraeth Brydeinig barchu cynigion a fydd yn cael eu pasio, gwelliannau a fydd yn cael eu pasio, i'r cynnig yr wythnos nesaf. Wel, does bosib y dylai fod Llywodraeth Cymru'n parchu yr un egwyddor fan hyn. Mae'r polisi wedi'i benderfynu, ac, wrth gwrs, nid gwahaniaeth semantig, fel oedd y Prif Weinidog yn dadlau ddoe, ydy hyn mor belled ag y mae'r undeb tollau yn y cwestiwn. Byddai parhau o fewn undeb tollau'r Undeb Ewropeaidd yn golygu y byddai allforwyr yn gallu parhau i fasnachu â'r Undeb Ewropeaidd fel nawr, heb orfod wynebu tariffau na rhwystrau di-dariff. Mae'r opsiwn arall, sef rhyw undeb tollau arall, yn ein rhoi ni yn yr un sefyllfa â Thwrci, yn gorfod llywio drwy rwystrau newydd, costus, fel rheoliadau rules of origin, er mwyn parhau i allforio i'r Undeb Ewropeaidd. Ac, wrth gwrs, nid yw'r undeb tollau yna ar gyfer Twrci yn cynnwys amaethyddiaeth. Felly, dyna pam mae'r gwahaniaeth yma'n allweddol, ac mae'r ffaith ein bod ni wedi pasio cynnig, a nawr mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn mynd nôl ar hynny, yn ôl yr hyn sydd wedi cael ei ddweud y prynhawn yma - rwy'n gresynu at hynny, gan ein bod ni mewn sefyllfa, wrth gwrs, o argyfwng nawr lle dylai bod yna eglurder gan Lywodraeth Cymru ynglŷn â'u safbwynt nhw. Felly, a gaf i ofyn i'r Prif Weinidog: pam fod polisi Llywodraeth Cymru, yn ôl yr hyn mae e wedi'i ddweud y prynhawn yma, ar y mater yma yn wahanol i'r polisi a gafodd ei gytuno gan y Senedd hon gyda chefnogaeth Llywodraeth Cymru ar 4 Rhagfyr? A pham ŷch chi'n credu bod gadael yr undeb tollau sydd yn bodoli o fudd i allforwyr Cymreig, gan ystyried yr holl resymau rydw i wedi sôn amdanyn nhw? Ac yn olaf, roedd y cynnig a gafodd ei gymeradwyo hefyd yn galw am ymestyn erthygl 50 heb amodau, yn wahanol i'r hyn rŷch chi wedi'i ddweud eto'r prynhawn yma yn y datganiad. Roeddech chi'n dweud eich bod chi'n gwneud popeth y gallwch chi er mwn osgoi'r dinistr yma sydd ar y gorwel. Os hynny, pam fod yna gymaint o Aelodau Llafur wedi gorfod ysgrifennu atoch chi i wneud mwy - i ymbil nid yn unig, wrth gwrs, ar y Prif Weinidog yn San Steffan, ond arweinydd eich plaid eich hun gan, ein bod ni nawr yn wynebu sefyllfa o fewn ychydig wythnosau o'r gyflafan yma? A'r opsiwn cliriach sydd ar y gorwel, wrth gwrs, ydy pleidlais y bobl. Pam nad ydych chi'n gallu dangos arweiniad yn hyn o beth ac osgoi'r hyn - yr ydych yn hollol iawn - all fod yn ddinistriol i bobl Cymru?