English: So, we reject the notion that the current standards are sufficient and we would consider all of those three categories that I've mentioned - prevention, reduction of inequalities, and the Welsh language - to be important enough to place on the face of the Bill. The Minister has already conceded that safety, effectiveness and the experience should be on the face of the Bill as part of what quality supposedly means, despite the health and care standards also referencing those too. He has defined some new things he wants to emphasise by bringing them on to the face of the Bill. Why not prevention, reduction of inequalities, and the Welsh language? We see no reason why other important factors in the quality of a service shouldn't also be on the face of the Bill. It allows for a clearer signal to be sent about what the Welsh Government considers important. The other question to ask is that if all these important indicators of quality are already part of the health and care standards then why the need for this legislation at all? Isn't quality already part of legislation underpinning the NHS? If the answer to that is that the standards are inadequate for the Minister to enforce on health boards, then what we need is either the strengthening of the current guidance on standards, or for standards perceived to be important and not currently being met to be put on the face of the Bill. So, either the standards are sufficient, in which case there's no need for the Bill, or they're not, and we need this Bill. If they're not, then this Bill needs to have a far stronger section on defining what quality is. So, I ask you to support these amendments. Diolch yn fawr iawn.
Welsh: Felly, rydym yn gwrthod y syniad bod y safonau presennol yn ddigonol a byddem yn ystyried pob un o'r tri chategori hynny yr wyf wedi sôn amdanynt - atal, lleihau anghydraddoldebau, a'r iaith Gymraeg - i fod yn ddigon pwysig i'w rhoi ar wyneb y Bil. Mae'r Gweinidog eisoes wedi cyfaddef y dylai diogelwch, effeithiolrwydd a'r profiad fod ar wyneb y Bil fel rhan o'r hyn y mae ansawdd yn ei olygu, er gwaethaf y ffaith bod safonau iechyd a gofal hefyd yn cyfeirio at y rheini. Mae wedi diffinio rhai pethau newydd y mae eisiau eu pwysleisio drwy ddod â nhw i wyneb y Bil. Pam ddim atal, lleihau anghydraddoldebau, a'r iaith Gymraeg? Ni welwn unrhyw reswm pam na ddylai ffactorau pwysig eraill o ran ansawdd y gwasanaeth fod ar wyneb y Bil hefyd. Mae'n rhoi arwydd cliriach o'r hyn y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn ei ystyried yn bwysig. Y cwestiwn arall i'w ofyn yw, os yw'r holl ddangosyddion ansawdd pwysig hyn eisoes yn rhan o'r safonau iechyd a gofal, pam y mae angen y ddeddfwriaeth hon o gwbl? Onid yw ansawdd eisoes yn rhan o'r ddeddfwriaeth sy'n sail i'r GIG? Os yr ateb i hynny yw bod y safonau'n annigonol i'r Gweinidog eu gorfodi ar fyrddau iechyd, yna yr hyn sydd ei angen yw naill ai cryfhau'r canllawiau presennol ar safonau, neu sicrhau bod safonau a ystyrir yn bwysig ac na chânt eu bodloni ar hyn o bryd yn cael eu rhoi ar wyneb y Bil. Felly, naill ai mae'r safonau'n ddigonol, ac felly nid oes angen y Bil, neu mae'r safonau'n annigonol, ac mae angen y Bil hwn arnom. Os nad ydyn nhw ddigonol, yna mae angen i'r Bil hwn gael adran gryfach o lawer ar ddiffinio beth yw ansawdd. Felly, gofynnaf ichi gefnogi'r gwelliannau hyn. Diolch yn fawr iawn.