techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: The agreement announced yesterday between the Welsh Government and Heathrow Airport is welcome. But, in stark contrast to that published in relation to Scotland, there are no concrete targets in the agreement, nothing on the amount of construction-related spend, nothing about the overall jobs target, nothing about landing charges or a development fund for flights. Is that because, essentially, the First Minister negotiated any leverage he had away by announcing his support for Heathrow, without actually getting these concessions, in contrast to what the Scottish Government did?
Welsh: Croesewir y cytundeb a gyhoeddwyd ddoe rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru a Maes Awyr Heathrow. Ond, mewn gwrthgyferbyniad llwyr i'r hyn a gyhoeddwyd o ran yr Alban, nid oes unrhyw dargedau pendant yn y cytundeb, dim byd am swm y gwariant sy'n gysylltiedig ag adeiladu, dim am y targed swyddi cyffredinol, dim am daliadau glanio neu gronfa ddatblygu ar gyfer teithiau awyr. A yw hynny oherwydd bod y Prif Weinidog, yn y bôn, wedi colli unrhyw fantais oedd ganddo mewn trafodaethau trwy ddatgan ei gefnogaeth i Heathrow, heb gael y consesiynau hyn mewn gwirionedd, yn wahanol i'r hyn a wnaeth Llywodraeth yr Alban?
English: Well, the question is about access to Cardiff Airport, but I'm more than happy to answer the question about Heathrow. I'm surprised he doesn't welcome the announcement yesterday - the fact that 8,000 jobs will be secured, all that investment, the fact that we worked with Heathrow to - [Interruption.] High-pitched screaming won't help him. The fact that we have secured commitment to manufacturing hubs outside Wales. We have an event on 5 July to ensure that Welsh businesses - [Interruption.] Well, he's still high-pitch screaming. Welsh businesses will be able to take full advantage - [Interruption.] He still hasn't learned his lesson. Welsh businesses will be able to -
Welsh: Wel, mae'r cwestiwn yn ymwneud â mynediad at Faes Awyr Caerdydd, ond rwy'n fwy na pharod i ateb y cwestiwn am Heathrow. Rwy'n synnu nad yw'n croesawu'r cyhoeddiad ddoe - y ffaith y bydd 8,000 o swyddi yn cael eu sicrhau, yr holl fuddsoddiad hwnnw, y ffaith einh bod wedi gweithio gyda Heathrow i - [Torri ar draws.] Ni wnaiff sgrechian main ei helpu. Y ffaith ein bod ni wedi sicrhau ymrwymiad i ganolfannau gweithgynhyrchu y tu allan i Gymru. Mae gennym ni ddigwyddiad ar 5 Gorffennaf i sicrhau bod busnesau Cymru - [Torri ar draws.] Wel, mae'n dal i sgrechian yn fain. Bydd busnesau Cymru yn gallu manteisio'n llawn - [Torri ar draws.] Nid yw wedi dysgu ei wers o hyd. Bydd busnesau Cymru yn gallu -
English: I think the Member is maybe screaming because the Member did welcome the statement yesterday. Carry on.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu efallai fod yr Aelod yn sgrechian gan fod yr Aelod wedi croesawu'r datganiad ddoe. Parhewch.
English: Well, I'm sure the Member can speak for himself, Llywydd, actually, on that basis. The issue is this: we will be creating thousands of jobs. We will be ensuring that there will be hubs for manufacturing outside Wales. We will be ensuring that there will be routes that are being looked at to Welsh airports, not just Cardiff - not just Cardiff. And what was announced yesterday is far more substantial than what Scotland has achieved.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n siŵr y gall yr Aelod siarad drosto'i hun, Lywydd, a dweud y gwir, ar y sail honno. Dyma'r pwynt: byddwn yn creu miloedd o swyddi. Byddwn yn sicrhau y bydd canolfannau ar gyfer gweithgynhyrchu y tu allan i Gymru. Byddwn yn sicrhau y bydd llwybrau sy'n cael eu hystyried i feysydd awyr Cymru, nid dim ond Caerdydd - nid dim ond Caerdydd. Ac mae'r hyn a gyhoeddwyd ddoe yn llawer mwy sylweddol na'r hyn y mae'r Alban wedi'i gyflawni.
English: Well, I'm going to give another welcome this afternoon. I'm going to welcome the growth in passenger numbers on the T9 bus service. I think that is fantastic news to welcome. Now, given the fact that this service is such a success and is now proving to be sustainable in the long term, will you commit to scrapping the £0.5 million Welsh Government subsidy for this service and instead offer subsidies to other bus services that have been axed by cuts to the bus operators grant?
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n mynd i roi croeso arall y prynhawn yma. Rwy'n mynd i groesawu'r twf i nifer y teithwyr ar wasanaeth bws T9. Credaf fod hynny'n newyddion gwych i'w groesawu. Nawr, o ystyried y ffaith bod y gwasanaeth hwn yn gymaint o lwyddiant a'i fod yn profi bellach ei fod yn gynaliadwy yn y tymor hir, a wnewch chi ymrwymo i gael gwared ar y cymhorthdal o £0.5 miliwn gan Lywodraeth Cymru ar gyfer y gwasanaeth hwn ac yn hytrach cynnig cymorthdaliadau i wasanaethau bws eraill y rhoddwyd terfyn arnynt gan doriadau i'r grant gweithredwyr bysiau?
English: What he seems to be suggesting is we shouldn't have a bus service to the airport. I can't agree with that position. It comes back to the position his party took - they didn't want the airport to succeed. At the end of the day, the Welsh Conservatives didn't want the airport to grow, they were happy to see the airport decline, they would have sat on their backsides and seen the airport close down. [Interruption.] They're still not happy at the fact that the airport is doing well in reality. They don't want to see a bus service to the airport, and we want to make sure there are public transport links to our airport in Cardiff, and they will continue. Having public transport links, surely, to any airport, whether they are bus or rail, are hugely important to the future development of any airport.
Welsh: Yr hyn y mae'n ymddangos ei fod yn ei awgrymu yw na ddylem ni gael gwasanaeth bws i'r maes awyr. Ni allaf gytuno â'r safbwynt hwnnw. Mae'n dod yn ôl at y safbwynt a gymerwyd gan ei blaid - nid oedden nhw eisiau i'r maes awyr lwyddo. Yn y pen draw, nid oedd y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig eisiau i'r maes awyr dyfu, roedden nhw'n hapus i weld y maes awyr yn dirywio, byddent wedi eistedd ar eu penolau a gweld y maes awyr yn cau. [Torri ar draws.] |Maen nhw'n dal i fod yn anhapus am y ffaith fod y maes awyr yn gwneud yn dda mewn gwirionedd. Nid ydyn nhw eisiau gweld gwasanaeth bws i'r maes awyr, ac rydym ni eisiau gwneud yn siŵr bod cysylltiadau cludiant cyhoeddus i'n maes awyr yng Nghaerdydd, a byddant yn parhau. Mae cael cysylltiadau cludiant cyhoeddus, yn sicr, i unrhyw faes awyr, pa un a ydynt yn fws neu'n rheilffordd, yn hynod bwysig i ddatblygiad unrhyw faes awyr ar gyfer y dyfodol.
English: Well, I welcome the partnership agreement between Welsh Government and Heathrow in respect of airlines wanting to fly out of Wales's Cardiff Airport to Heathrow, and the potential of thousands of new skilled jobs it could create, alongside boosting the Welsh economy. However, for my constituents and people and businesses across north-east Wales, it's increased and better connections with airports such as Liverpool and Manchester that make a direct difference to them. So, First Minister, can I urge that enhanced connectivity and greater efficiency of train links to the neighbouring north-western airports form a key part of the north-east Wales metro plans and are considered as part of the Wales and borders franchise?
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n croesawu'r cytundeb partneriaeth rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru a Heathrow o ran cwmnïau hedfan sydd eisiau hedfan allan o Faes Awyr Caerdydd Cymru i Heathrow, a'r potensial o filoedd o swyddi medrus newydd y gallai eu creu, ochr yn ochr â rhoi hwb i economi Cymru. Fodd bynnag, i'm hetholwyr i a phobl a busnesau ar draws y gogledd-ddwyrain, cysylltiadau cynyddol a gwell gyda meysydd awyr fel Lerpwl a Manceinion sy'n gwneud gwahaniaeth uniongyrchol iddyn nhw. Felly, Brif Weinidog, a gaf i annog bod gwell cysylltedd a mwy o effeithlonrwydd o ran cysylltiadau trên i feysydd awyr cyfagos gogledd-orllewin Lloegr yn rhan allweddol o gynlluniau metro gogledd-ddwyrain Cymru ac yn cael eu hystyried yn rhan o fasnachfraint Cymru a'r gororau?
English: Yes. I can say that, with the support of the Welsh Government, Arriva Trains Wales secured additional paths from the north of Wales to Manchester Airport. Those additional services started operating in May of last year, and we are working, of course, with Merseytravel to develop opportunities for delivering new services to Liverpool and to John Lennon airport in the next franchise, on the reopened Halton curve.
Welsh: Ie. Gallaf ddweud, gyda chymorth Llywodraeth Cymru, bod Trenau Arriva Cymru wedi sicrhau llwybrau ychwanegol o ogledd Cymru i Faes Awyr Manceinion gyda chefnogaeth Llywodraeth Cymru. Dechreuodd y gwasanaethau ychwanegol hynny weithredu ym mis Mai y llynedd, ac rydym ni'n gweithio, wrth gwrs, gyda Merseytravel i ddatblygu cyfleoedd ar gyfer cyflwyno gwasanaethau newydd i Lerpwl ac i faes awyr John Lennon yn y fasnachfraint nesaf, ar droad Halton sydd wedi ailagor.
English: First Minister, I put in a freedom of information request to Cardiff Airport, owned by the Welsh public. I wanted to know how much money had been spent on lobbying firms, what companies had been employed, and whether or not there had been a tender process gone through by those lobbying companies. Now, this is owned by the Welsh public, so the public have a right to know these things. The airport have refused to answer. What do you make of this?
Welsh: Brif Weinidog, cyflwynais gais rhyddid gwybodaeth i Faes Awyr Caerdydd, sy'n eiddo i'r cyhoedd yng Nghymru. Roeddwn i eisiau gwybod faint o arian a wariwyd ar gwmnïau lobïo, pa gwmnïau a gyflogwyd, a pha un a fu'r cwmnïau lobïo hyn trwy broses dendro ai peidio. Nawr, mae hwn yn eiddo i'r cyhoedd yng Nghymru, felly mae gan y cyhoedd hawl i wybod y pethau hyn. Mae'r maes awyr wedi gwrthod ateb. Beth yw eich barn ar hyn?
English: Well, I mean, there are ways of appealing, if he feels that his request hasn't been dealt with.
Welsh: Wel, hynny yw, mae ffyrdd o apelio, os yw'n teimlo nad yw ei gais wedi cael sylw.
English: Diolch, Lywydd. Whilst the First Minister was away last week, he may have seen that the Cabinet Secretary for finance wrote to the Chancellor of the Exchequer about proposed public spending cuts in two or three years' time, which set to amount to £3.5 billion. The Government, this year, is running a budget deficit equivalent to £60 billion. George Osborne managed the singular achievement of borrowing twice as much money in six years as Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling. The national debt is now £1,800 billion, compared with £1,200 billion six years ago. That's £28,000 for every person in Wales - indeed, the United Kingdom. It's very easy to spend money we haven't got, of course, and everybody would like to be able to borrow interminably and never to have to pay it back. By how much does he think the Government's borrowing requirement should increase on a permanent basis?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Tra bod y Prif Weinidog i ffwrdd yr wythnos diwethaf, efallai ei fod wedi gweld bod Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros gyllid wedi ysgrifennu at Ganghellor y Trysorlys ynghylch toriadau arfaethedig i wariant cyhoeddus ymhen dwy neu dair blynedd, a fydd yn gyfanswm o £3.5 biliwn. Mae'r Llywodraeth, eleni, yn rhedeg diffyg yn y gyllideb sy'n cyfateb i £60 biliwn. Llwyddodd George Osborne i gyflawni'r gamp unigryw o fenthyg dwywaith gymaint o arian mewn chwe blynedd ag a wnaeth Gordon Brown ac Alistair Darling. Mae'r ddyled genedlaethol yn £1,800 biliwn erbyn hyn, o'i gymharu â £1,200 biliwn chwe blynedd yn ôl. Mae hynny'n £28,000 ar gyfer pob person yng Nghymru - y Deyrnas Unedig, yn wir. Mae'n hawdd iawn gwario arian nad oes gennym, wrth gwrs, a byddai pawb yn hoffi gallu benthyg yn ddiderfyn a byth yn gorfod ei ad-dalu. O faint y mae'n credu y dylai gofyniad benthyg y Llywodraeth gynyddu ar sail barhaol?
English: That is a very strong case indeed for borrowing now to invest for the future. It's never been cheaper to borrow money on the world markets. We know from the experience after the end of the second world war, when the UK was in a far worse position than it is now financially, that the Government of the day took the position that it would seek to borrow money in order to invest for the future. Then, we saw, of course, the economic growth of the 1950s and the 1960s. So, I am unashamedly Keynesian in this regard. I take the view that Government should be borrowing now in order to invest, in order to create the income that will pay back the cost of that borrowing and more in the future.
Welsh: Mae hwnnw'n achos cryf iawn yn wir dros fenthyg nawr i fuddsoddi ar gyfer y dyfodol. Nid yw erioed wedi bod yn rhatach i fenthyg arian ar farchnadoedd y byd. Rydym ni'n gwybod o brofiad ar ôl diwedd yr ail ryfel byd, pan oedd y DU mewn sefyllfa waeth o lawer nag y mae ynddi nawr yn ariannol, bod Llywodraeth y dydd wedi cymryd y safbwynt y byddai'n ceisio benthyg arian er mwyn buddsoddi ar gyfer y dyfodol. Yna, gwelsom, wrth gwrs, dwf economaidd y 1950au a'r 1960au. Felly, rwy'n Keynesaidd heb gywilydd yn hyn o beth. Rwyf o'r farn y dylai'r Llywodraeth fod yn benthyg nawr er mwyn buddsoddi, er mwyn creu'r incwm a fydd yn ad-dalu cost y benthyca hwnnw a mwy yn y dyfodol.
English: But the First Minister knows that never happens. He has only to look at the recent history of the UK Government's debt position to see what the reality is. We have a well-being of future generations Act in Wales - a very good thing it is too - but what we're doing by carrying on with this 'rake's progress' of borrowing, of course, is to hand on to the next generation a massive debt, which they will have to repay. I don't think that's a terribly moral position for us to hold. But, there's a better solution to this. We don't have to borrow that money at all. We can look at what the Government spends money on at the moment and cut without any risk to anybody in Britain being disadvantaged. Let's just take the foreign aid budget, for example, on which we're spending £12 billion this year. If we just knocked £3.5 billion off that £12 billion, that would amount to the same sort of saving that the Cabinet Secretary for finance wants the Chancellor of the Exchequer to avoid deducting from the Welsh Government's budget. There are plenty of reasons why we should cut the foreign aid budget. So, is the First Minister putting the interests of people in foreign countries before the interests of the people of Wales?
Welsh: Ond mae'r Prif Weinidog yn gwybod nad yw hynny byth yn digwydd. Does dim ond rhaid iddo edrych ar hanes diweddar sefyllfa ddyled Llywodraeth y DU i weld beth yw'r gwirionedd. Mae gennym ni Ddeddf llesiant cenedlaethau'r dyfodol yng Nghymru - peth da iawn yw hi hefyd - ond yr hyn yr ydym ni'n ei wneud trwy barhau â'r sefyllfa 'hynt yr oferwr' hwn o fenthyg, wrth gwrs, yw trosglwyddo dyled enfawr i'r genhedlaeth nesaf, y bydd yn rhaid iddyn nhw ei had-dalu. Nid wyf yn credu bod hwnnw'n safbwynt arbennig o foesol i ni ei fabwysiadu. Ond, mae ateb gwell i hyn. Nid oes rhaid i ni fenthyg yr arian hwnnw o gwbl. Gallwn edrych ar yr hyn y mae'r Llywodraeth yn gwario arian arno ar hyn o bryd a thorri heb unrhyw berygl y bydd unrhyw un ym Mhrydain dan anfantais. Gadewch i ni ystyried y gyllideb cymorth tramor, er enghraifft, yr ydym ni'n gwario £12 biliwn arni eleni. Pe byddem ni'n tynnu dim ond 3.5 biliwn oddi ar y £12 biliwn, byddai hynny'n gyfystyr â'r un math o arbediad y mae Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros gyllid eisiau i Ganghellor y Trysorlys beidio â'i ddidynnu o gyllideb Llywodraeth Cymru. Ceir digonedd o resymau pam y dylem ni dorri'r gyllideb cymorth tramor. Felly, a yw'r Prif Weinidog yn rhoi buddiannau pobl mewn gwledydd tramor o flaen buddiannau pobl Cymru?
English: I think the leader of UKIP is being naive in what he says. First of all, there is the obvious moral question of those countries that are rich helping those countries that are poor. The example of Norway is a prime example of that. The Norway Grants were set up by the Norwegian Government because they felt they'd done very well out of oil and gas and wanted to give something back to people who had less. So, that altruism and that desire to help humanity is hugely strong. But also, if we look at it economically, aid buys friends and allies. If you don't provide aid to countries in order to help them and they will remain your friend in the future, someone else will do it. So, yes, it's right to say that there is a strong moral case for aid, but, in diplomatic terms, it's also correct to say that, if you offer aid to countries that grow in the future, they will remain your friends and will trade with you in the future, increasing the wealth of their own people and of course buying the goods that you manufacture.
Welsh: Rwy'n meddwl bod arweinydd UKIP yn bod yn naïf yn yr hyn a ddywed. Yn gyntaf oll, ceir y cwestiwn moesol amlwg o'r gwledydd hynny sy'n gyfoethog yn helpu'r gwledydd hynny sy'n dlawd. Mae enghraifft Norwy yn enghraifft berffaith o hynny. Sefydlwyd Grantiau Norwy gan Lywodraeth Norwy oherwydd eu bod yn teimlo eu bod wedi gwneud yn dda iawn o olew a nwy ac eisiau rhoi rhywbeth yn ôl i bobl sydd â llai. Felly, mae'r anhunanoldeb hwnnw a'r awydd i helpu dynoliaeth yn gryf dros ben. Ond hefyd, os edrychwn ni ar y mater yn economaidd, mae cymorth yn prynu ffrindiau a chynghreiriaid. Os na fyddwch yn darparu cymorth i wledydd er mwyn eu helpu nhw ac y byddant yn parhau i fod yn ffrind i chi yn y dyfodol, bydd rhywun arall yn ei wneud. Felly, ydy, mae'n iawn dweud bod achos moesol cryf dros gymorth, ond, mewn termau diplomyddol, mae hefyd yn gywir i ddweud, os ydych chi'n cynnig cymorth i wledydd a fydd yn tyfu yn y dyfodol, byddant yn parhau i fod yn ffrindiau i chi ac yn masnachu gyda chi yn y dyfodol, gan gynyddu cyfoeth eu pobl eu hunain a phrynu'r nwyddau yr ydych chi'n eu gweithgynhyrchu, wrth gwrs.
English: Of course there is a humanitarian case for aid and nobody is against that, but a lot of our aid budget actually goes to countries that are spending a huge amount of money upon projects that we wouldn't regard for a moment as humanitarian. For example, we're increasing our aid to Pakistan this year by £100 million to nearly £450 million a year. Pakistan, this year, is increasing its defence budget by £635 million to £6.7 billion. They spend far more per capita on defence than we do in the United Kingdom. They've also got a nuclear programme and a space programme. So, what we're in effect doing by increasing the amount of aid that we're giving to Pakistan is indirectly funding their military, space and nuclear budgets.
Welsh: Wrth gwrs bod achos dyngarol dros gymorth ac nid oes neb yn erbyn hynny, ond mae llawer o'n cyllideb cymorth yn mynd i wledydd sy'n gwario symiau enfawr o arian ar brosiectau na fyddem ni'n eu hystyried yn ddyngarol am eiliad. Er enghraifft, rydym ni'n cynyddu ein cymorth i Bacistan gan £100 miliwn eleni i bron i £450 miliwn y flwyddyn. Mae Pacistan, eleni, yn cynyddu ei chyllideb amddiffyn gan £635 miliwn i £6.7 biliwn. Maen nhw'n gwario llawer mwy y pen ar amddiffyn nag yr ydym ni'n ei wneud yn y Deyrnas Unedig. Mae ganddyn nhw raglen niwclear a rhaglen ofod hefyd. Felly, yr hyn yr ydym ni'n ei wneud i bob pwrpas trwy gynyddu faint o gymorth yr ydym ni'n ei roi i Bacistan yw ariannu eu cyllidebau milwrol, gofod a niwclear yn anuniongyrchol.
English: He uses one example. There are many, many other examples of countries where people have suffered greatly, a lot of it due to the ineptitude of European powers who left those countries with artificial boundaries and with economic incoherence, and who left those countries without a tradition of governance. They were left to struggle as a result of it. Many of those countries now have good governance. If we look at Ghana, for example, Ghana is a country where governance is robust, yet many of the people there are paying for the mistakes that were made in the 1960s after independence. I see nothing wrong in providing aid to people in order to enable them to survive, of course, but also in order to enable people to develop themselves economically and, of course, to enable those people then to provide for their families. I was in Uganda two years ago. The one thing that struck me about Uganda was the sheer entrepreneurial spirit of the people. What they didn't have was capital. Coffee was the main cash crop. They saved money from coffee in order to provide themselves with capital - they had no other way of doing it. The great thing that happened in Uganda was banking via mobile phones - people could transfer money around in a way that they couldn't before. For many, many people around the world, they just need a bit of help in order to prosper, and that's why we give aid to people - in order to make sure that they can prosper in the future and that their communities can prosper in the future.
Welsh: Mae'n defnyddio un enghraifft. Ceir llawer iawn iawn o enghreifftiau eraill o wledydd lle mae pobl wedi dioddef yn fawr, llawer ohono oherwydd anfedrusrwydd pwerau Ewropeaidd a adawodd y gwledydd hynny gyda ffiniau artiffisial a chyda dryswch economaidd, ac a adawodd y gwledydd hynny heb draddodiad o lywodraethu. Fe'u gadawyd mewn anawsterau o ganlyniad. Mae gan lawer o'r gwledydd hynny lywodraethu da erbyn hyn. Os edrychwn ni ar Ghana, er enghraifft, mae Ghana yn wlad lle mae llywodraethu yn gadarn, ac eto mae llawer o'r bobl yno yn talu am y camgymeriadau a wnaed yn y 1960au ar ôl annibyniaeth. Nid wyf yn gweld dim byd o'i le o ran darparu cymorth i bobl er mwyn eu galluogi i oroesi, wrth gwrs, ond hefyd er mwyn galluogi pobl i ddatblygu eu hunain yn economaidd ac, wrth gwrs, i alluogi'r bobl hynny wedyn i ddarparu ar gyfer eu teuluoedd. Roeddwn i yn Uganda ddwy flynedd yn ôl. Yr un peth wnaeth fy nharo i am Uganda oedd ysbryd entrepreneuraidd llwyr y bobl. Yr hyn nad oedd ganddynt oedd cyfalaf. Coffi oedd y prif gnwd arian parod. Roedden nhw'n arbed arian o goffi er mwyn darparu cyfalaf i'w hunain - nid oedd ganddynt unrhyw ffordd arall o'i wneud. Y peth gwych a ddigwyddodd yn Uganda oedd bancio trwy ffonau symudol - gallai pobl symud arian o gwmpas mewn ffordd na allent o'r blaen. I lawer iawn o bobl ledled y byd, y cwbl sydd ei angen arnynt yw ychydig o gymorth er mwyn ffynnu, a dyna pam yr ydym ni'n rhoi cymorth i bobl - er mwyn gwneud yn siŵr y gallant ffynnu yn y dyfodol ac y gall eu cymunedau ffynnu yn y dyfodol.
English: Diolch, Lywydd. First Minister, on 16 January, you introduced the Trade Union (Wales) Bill. The intention of that Bill is to disapply aspects of the UK Government's Trade Union Act 2016. Plaid Cymru supports this - we believe that industrial relations should be decided upon here and not in Westminster. Your trade union Bill will be in competence under the Assembly's current powers. Do you believe that it will be in competence under the reserved-powers model that we are moving to under the new Wales Act?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Brif Weinidog, ar 16 Ionawr, cyflwynwyd Bil Undebau Llafur (Cymru) gennych. Bwriad y Bil hwnnw yw datgymhwyso agweddau ar Ddeddf Undeb Llafur 2016 Llywodraeth y DU. Mae Plaid Cymru yn cefnogi hyn - credwn y dylai cysylltiadau diwydiannol gael eu penderfynu yma ac nid yn San Steffan. Bydd eich Bil undebau llafur yn gymwys o dan bwerau presennol y Cynulliad. A ydych chi'n credu y bydd yn gymwys o dan y model cadw pwerau yr ydym ni'n symud iddo o dan y Ddeddf Cymru newydd?
English: The competence will change, but our belief is this: we will pass this legislation and we will do what is right by the people of Wales. It is a matter then for the UK Parliament to decide whether it wishes to override an Act that was passed by the people of Wales in their Parliament. If they choose to do that, they will precipitate a constitutional crisis.
Welsh: Bydd y cymhwysedd yn newid, ond ein cred ni yw hyn: byddwn yn pasio'r ddeddfwriaeth hon a byddwn yn gwneud yr hyn sy'n iawn i bobl Cymru. Mae'n fater wedyn i Senedd y DU benderfynu a yw'n dymuno gwrthwneud Deddf a basiwyd gan bobl Cymru yn eu Senedd. Os bydd yn dewis gwneud hynny, bydd yn creu argyfwng cyfansoddiadol.