English: Thank you for that, and thank you for the consistent way in which you are raising this issue of access to justice, because it's important to everybody within Wales, in devolved and non-devolved areas. You raise the issues of Grenfell and Hillsborough. I would add to that the long-standing issue in terms of the coroner's courts and how that ought to be something that is devolved, after all, it is funded by the local authorities. The full provision there is made by local authorities; it's paid for out of money that comes ultimately from Welsh Government. So, there is a logic there to some of these particular changes. I agree with you very much about the point you made and I think that others have made, and that is the imbalance that exists within our justice system, and that is why we have these fundamental arguments for reform, because, as I've said, this actually should not be a party political issue; this is about fundamental democracy, fundamental issues around the rule of law. Can I say, in terms of the last point you tempted me to comment on, which I normally wouldn't but on this occasion I will, just how impressed I've been by the Scottish Conservatives at least taking a stand in respect of their political interest in respect of Scotland? And how disappointing it is on an issue where, whatever their political persuasion is, people should be standing up for something that is clearly of importance to the people of Wales, rather than a sort of banal subservience to Westminster, irrespective of the logics and the merits of the arguments that we've been discussing today. I really do hope that will change, because we could make so much more progress in terms of the reform and the devolution of justice if we had the Welsh Conservatives actually talking about what I suspect they know is right but are not prepared to actually put their heads above the parapet to take that particular stance. So, that is the particular change I want there. But in terms of the overall progress, there are three elements to it, I think. One is that we will work increasingly collaboratively with UK Government and the Ministry of Justice on those areas that are non-devolved but where we can work for the benefit of the people of Wales. Secondly, we will be increasingly putting the case as to how we can make justice better in Wales and the things that we want to see changed. Thirdly, I think we have to start preparing for the structure of what a new Welsh justice system would look like, because I agree very much with what Lord Thomas said - it's not a question of if, but when, and we have to be prepared for that. Of course, one of the key triggering factors may well be the moves in terms of the reforms of that part of the justice system that already we are responsible for, and that is the tribunals service. Thank you for your question.
Welsh: Diolch am hynna, a diolch i chi am y ffordd gyson yr ydych yn codi'r mater hwn o fynediad at gyfiawnder, oherwydd mae'n bwysig i bawb yng Nghymru, mewn meysydd datganoledig a rhai nad ydyn nhw wedi'u datganoli. Rydych yn codi materion Grenfell a Hillsborough. Hoffwn ychwanegu at hynny'r mater hirsefydlog o ran llysoedd y crwner a sut y dylai hynny fod yn rhywbeth sydd wedi'i ddatganoli, wedi'r cyfan, caiff ei ariannu gan yr awdurdodau lleol. Mae'r ddarpariaeth lawn yno yn cael ei gwneud gan awdurdodau lleol; mae'n cael ei dalu o arian sy'n dod yn y pen draw gan Lywodraeth Cymru. Felly, mae rhesymeg yno i rai o'r newidiadau penodol hyn. Rwy'n cytuno â chi'n gryf iawn ynghylch y pwynt a wnaethoch ac rwy'n credu bod eraill wedi'i wneud, a dyna'r anghydbwysedd sy'n bodoli o fewn ein system gyfiawnder, a dyna pam y mae gennym y dadleuon sylfaenol hyn dros ddiwygio, oherwydd, fel y dywedais i, ni ddylai hyn fod yn fater gwleidyddol pleidiol; mae hyn yn ymwneud â democratiaeth sylfaenol, materion sylfaenol sy'n ymwneud â rheolaeth y gyfraith. A gaf i ddweud, o ran y pwynt olaf y gwnaethoch fy nhemtio i wneud sylwadau arno, na fyddwn i fel arfer, ond y tro hwn, fe wnaf, sef cymaint yr wyf yn edmygu Ceidwadwyr yr Alban am o leiaf wneud safiad mewn cysylltiad â'u diddordeb gwleidyddol o ran yr Alban? A pha mor siomedig ydyw ar fater lle, beth bynnag fo'u perswâd gwleidyddol, y dylai pobl fod yn gwneud safiad dros rywbeth sy'n amlwg yn bwysig i bobl Cymru, yn hytrach na rhyw fath o waseidd-dra di-lewyrch i San Steffan, ni waeth beth fo'r rhesymeg a rhinweddau'r dadleuon yr ydym ni wedi bod yn eu trafod heddiw. Rwy'n gobeithio'n fawr y bydd hynny'n newid, oherwydd gallem ni wneud cymaint mwy o gynnydd o ran diwygio a datganoli cyfiawnder pe bai gennym y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig mewn gwirionedd yn sôn am yr hyn yr wyf yn amau eu bod yn gwybod ei fod yn iawn ond nad ydyn nhw'n ddigon dewr i fabwysiadu'r safbwynt penodol hwnnw. Felly, dyna'r newid penodol yr wyf i eisiau ei weld. Ond o ran y cynnydd cyffredinol, mae tair elfen iddo, rwy'n credu. Un ohonyn nhw yw y byddwn ni'n cydweithio fwyfwy â Llywodraeth y DU a'r Weinyddiaeth Gyfiawnder ar y meysydd hynny nad ydyn nhw wedi'u datganoli ond lle y gallwn weithio er budd pobl Cymru. Yn ail, byddwn yn cyflwyno'r achos fwyfwy ynghylch sut y gallwn ni wneud cyfiawnder yn well yng Nghymru a'r pethau yr ydym ni eisiau eu gweld yn newid. Yn drydydd, rwy'n credu bod yn rhaid i ni ddechrau paratoi ar gyfer strwythur yr hyn y byddai ffurf system cyfiawnder newydd i Gymru, oherwydd rwy'n cytuno'n gryf â'r hyn a ddywedodd yr Arglwydd Thomas - nid yw'n fater o os, ond pryd, ac mae'n rhaid i ni fod yn barod ar gyfer hynny. Wrth gwrs, mae'n ddigon posibl mai un o'r ffactorau allweddol sy'n sbarduno yw'r camau o ran diwygio'r rhan honno o'r system gyfiawnder yr ydym ni eisoes yn gyfrifol amdani, a dyna'r gwasanaeth tribiwnlysoedd. Diolch am eich cwestiwn.