English: As we all know, there's been a substantial increase in the number of people in private rented accommodation as the number of council houses has decreased, and many of those houses that would have been available for first-time buyers have been bought up by private landlords and now privately rented. So, this is a lose-lose situation. Whilst I welcome the tripling of the two months' to six months' notice a landlord needs to give, and that a six months' tenancy must be completed - that's certainly moving in the right direction - the effect on children's education and family life of having to move after a year is serious. I still support the ending of no-fault evictions. I'm disappointed with the decision not to end it. I've heard what the Minister has said. I still don't understand why you couldn't say, 'There would be no-fault evictions, but you have to do - it's six months, and then six months if you wish to move back into it yourself', rather than having it as it is now that they can give six months' notice after six months for any reason that they care to have. On a positive point, I'm very pleased to see action being taken over empty, abandoned houses. None of us have been out campaigning in the streets without wandering past houses with notices in 'If you don't come back in 14 days' because they've obviously been abandoned. If you could explain exactly how you're going to bring abandoned houses back into use more quickly, because not only do abandoned houses affect the landlord, they affect all those people living in the area who get serious problems from having an abandoned house next to them, and there are occasions when abandoned houses are taken over by gangs of youths and others who break in because the abandoned house has not been properly protected. On the six months and six months, how is the Welsh Government going to ensure that landlords actually do that, that they actually follow the rules, and what will happen to landlords who don't follow the rules?
Welsh: Fel y gŵyr pob un ohonom ni, bu cynnydd sylweddol yn nifer y bobl mewn llety preifat ar rent gan fod nifer y tai cyngor wedi gostwng, ac mae llawer o'r tai hynny a fuasai ar gael i brynwyr am y tro cyntaf wedi cael eu prynu gan landlordiaid preifat a bellach yn cael eu rhentu'n breifat. Mae hyn yn sefyllfa lle mae pawb ar ei golled. Er fy mod yn croesawu treblu'r cyfnod rhybudd y mae angen i landlord ei roi o ddau fis i chwe mis, a bod yn rhaid cwblhau tenantiaeth chwe mis - mae hynny'n sicr yn gam i'r cyfeiriad cywir - mae'r effaith ar addysg plant a bywyd teuluol o orfod symud ar ôl blwyddyn yn ddifrifol. Rwy'n dal i gefnogi terfynu achosion o droi allan heb fai. Rwy'n siomedig â'r penderfyniad i beidio â therfynu hynny. Rwyf wedi clywed yr hyn a ddywedodd y Gweinidog. Nid wyf yn deall o hyd pam na allech chi ddweud, 'byddai modd troi allan heb fai, ond rhaid ichi wneud - chwe mis yw'r cyfnod, ac wedyn chwe mis os dymunwch symud yn ôl i mewn i'r eiddo eich hun', yn hytrach na'i gael fel y mae nawr lle gallant roi chwe mis o rybudd ar ôl chwe mis am unrhyw reswm y dymunen nhw. Ar bwynt cadarnhaol, rwy'n falch iawn o weld gweithredu o ran tai gwag, gadawedig. Nid oes yr un ohonom ni wedi bod allan yn ymgyrchu yn y strydoedd heb grwydro heibio tai gyda hysbysiadau ynddynt 'os nad ydych yn dychwelyd mewn 14 diwrnod' oherwydd eu bod yn amlwg wedi eu gadael. A wnewch chi egluro'n union sut y byddwch yn dod â thai gadawedig yn ôl i ddefnydd yn gyflymach, oherwydd nid yn unig y mae tai gadawedig yn effeithio ar y landlord, maen nhw'n effeithio ar yr holl bobl hynny sy'n byw yn yr ardal sy'n cael problemau difrifol o gael tŷ gadawedig yn eu hymyl, ac mae adegau pan gaiff tai gadawedig eu meddiannu gan gangiau o bobl ifanc ac eraill sy'n torri i mewn gan nad yw'r tŷ gadawedig wedi ei ddiogelu'n iawn. O ran y chwe mis a chwe mis, sut mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn mynd i sicrhau bod landlordiaid yn gwneud hynny mewn gwirionedd, eu bod yn dilyn y rheolau o ddifrif, a beth fydd yn digwydd i landlordiaid nad ydyn nhw'n dilyn y rheolau?