English: I share the Member's frustration, as he well knows. I've been doing my tour of Wales and I've heard a lot from members of the public who are very frustrated by the scheduling letters that they get. I don't want to indulge in semantics, because it just irritates people, but obviously we don't promise it. We're talking about scheduled works and there are a number of complex engineering reasons why sometimes that doesn't work. The reason I don't know everybody who was in that schedule and then didn't make the deadline is because I only know the people who have written to me and there may well be others who I'm not aware of. So, I could give you a subsection, but we don't hold the numbers in that way. I'm not trying to get out of it; we just don't hold the numbers in that way. What I will be able to tell you is how many people were in and, therefore, how many people are left. It's the people who are left that we most want to concentrate on. As I said in response to Angela Burns earlier, this isn't about the money, except that obviously we don't want to pay for something we haven't had; this is about using the money to get people connected. I completely accept the issue around comms. There were complex reasons for that, which are to do with the fact that we did this on the basis of postcodes, and not all postcodes and people are connected at the same time, and there are complex reasons for that, which I won't go into, but which have led to this really very frustrating position. When I make the announcements about the next phase, you'll see that we're actually targeting individual premises. We won't have this issue about a pool of people, some of whom get connected and others of whom won't. We'll have a range of responses to that to make sure that we are fairly confident about where we can get, and that we're having good conversations with people where we think that there may be more technical difficulties.
Welsh: Rwy'n rhannu rhwystredigaeth yr Aelod, fel y mae'n gwybod. Rwyf wedi bod ar daith o amgylch Cymru ac rwyf wedi clywed llawer gan aelodau o'r cyhoedd sy'n rhwystredig iawn oherwydd y llythyrau y maent yn eu cael mewn perthynas â'r amserlen. Nid wyf eisiau ymroi i semanteg, oherwydd mae hynny'n codi gwrychyn pobl, ond yn amlwg nid ydym yn gwneud addewidion. Rydym yn sôn am waith sydd wedi'i drefnu ac mae nifer o resymau peirianyddol cymhleth pam nad yw'n gweithio bob amser. Y rheswm pam nad wyf yn gwybod am bawb a oedd ar yr amserlen honno ac na lwyddodd i gael y gwaith wedi ei wneud erbyn y dyddiad terfynol yw mai'r unig bobl y gwn amdanynt yw'r bobl sydd wedi ysgrifennu ataf ac mae'n dra phosibl fod rhai eraill nad wyf yn ymwybodol ohonynt. Felly, gallwn roi is-adran i chi, ond nid ydym yn cadw'r niferoedd yn y ffordd honno. Nid wyf yn ceisio osgoi gwneud hynny; ond nid ydym yn cadw'r niferoedd yn y ffordd honno. Yr hyn y gallaf ei ddweud wrthych yw faint o bobl a gafodd eu cynnwys ac felly, faint o bobl sydd ar ôl. Y bobl sydd ar ôl yw'r rhai rydym eisiau canolbwyntio arnynt fwyaf. Fel y dywedais mewn ymateb i Angela Burns yn gynharach, nid yw hyn yn ymwneud â'r arian, ond yn amlwg nid ydym eisiau talu am rhywbeth nad ydym wedi'i gael; mae hyn yn ymwneud â defnyddio'r arian i gysylltu pobl. Rwy'n derbyn y broblem ynglŷn â chyfathrebu yn llwyr. Roedd rhesymau cymhleth dros hynny, sy'n ymwneud â'r ffaith ein bod wedi gwneud hyn ar sail codau post, ac nid yw pob cod post a phob person yn cael eu cysylltu ar yr un pryd, ac mae rhesymau cymhleth dros hynny, ac nid wyf am eu trafod yn awr, ond maent wedi arwain at y sefyllfa hynod rwystredig hon. Pan fyddaf yn gwneud y cyhoeddiadau am y cyfnod nesaf, fe welwch ein bod yn targedu safleoedd unigol mewn gwirionedd. Ni fydd gennym y broblem hon o gael carfan o bobl, gyda rhai ohonynt yn cael eu cysylltu ac eraill nad ydynt yn cael eu cysylltu. Bydd gennym ystod o ymatebion i hynny i wneud yn siŵr ein bod yn weddol hyderus ynglŷn â lle y gallwn gysylltu, a'n bod yn cael sgyrsiau da gyda phobl lle rydym yn credu y gallai fod anawsterau mwy technegol.