English: Thanks to the First Minister for bringing us another statement on Brexit. You say, First Minister, that you want a Brexit that protects jobs. Jobs for whom, I wonder - jobs for British people, or jobs for the hundreds of thousands of people who have come to Britain in recent years, who together comprise - [ Interruption.] - who together comprise a formidable pool of cheap labour for big business? So, my first question is: do you acknowledge that the interests of British people have to be a higher priority for the UK Government than the interests of non-British EU citizens? Perhaps, once freedom of movement ends, the job prospects of Welsh people at the lower end of the labour market in Newport, Cardiff, Swansea and Wrexham, and other towns in those travel-to-work areas, may markedly improve. Things may materially - [ Interruption.] - things may materially get better for those people struggling to find a job - struggling to find a job with decent pay and conditions, struggling to find a job with guaranteed hours. Those conditions may conceivably improve once we actually have something limiting the endless supply of cheap labour, such as a proper immigration policy. Perhaps I can ask you if you acknowledge this possibility. You say there was a pretence that we could bring back control over our borders. Do you therefore believe that the UK Government cannot hope to exercise control over its borders, and do you think that would be a laudable situation? You say that, if the Prime Minister cannot secure a deal, she should seek an extension, so that we can have either a general election or a public vote - in other words, another referendum. What would be the point of either eventuality, I ask myself: a general election so that the Labour Party - the national Labour Party, led by the arch leaver, Jeremy Corbyn - can put forward another formulation that takes us no further forward, because nobody knows what Labour's position in Westminster actually is. Last time, they stood on a platform of respecting the referendum result and leaving the European Union. So, what about another public vote? Why, when it will in itself mean ignoring the clear mandate provided in the last one, which has not yet been implemented, and, under your formula, perhaps never will be? The UK voted to leave, and so did Wales. We need to stop this shilly-shallying and leave the EU in 10 weeks' time. Seventeen million people will cheer when we do.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Prif Weinidog am gyflwyno datganiad arall inni ar Brexit. Rydych chi'n dweud, Prif Weinidog, eich bod chi eisiau Brexit sy'n diogelu swyddi. Swyddi ar gyfer pwy, tybed - swyddi i bobl Prydain, neu swyddi i'r cannoedd ar filoedd o bobl sydd wedi dod i Brydain yn ystod y blynyddoedd diwethaf, sydd, gyda'i gilydd - [ Torri ar draws.] - sydd, gyda'i gilydd yn ffurfio cronfa aruthrol o lafur rhad ar gyfer busnesau mawr? Felly, fy nghwestiwn cyntaf yw: a ydych chi'n cydnabod bod yn rhaid i fuddiannau pobl Prydain fod yn flaenoriaeth uwch i Lywodraeth y DU na buddiannau dinasyddion yr UE nad ydyn nhw'n Brydeinwyr? Efallai, pan ddaw rhyddid i symud i ben, efallai y bydd rhagolygon gwaith pobl Cymru sydd ar ris isaf y farchnad lafur yng Nghasnewydd, Caerdydd, Abertawe a Wrecsam, a threfi eraill yn yr ardaloedd teithio-i'r-gwaith hynny, yn gwella'n sylweddol. Gall pethau - [ Torri ar draws.] - gall pethau wella'n faterol ar gyfer y bobl hynny sy'n ei chael hi'n anodd dod o hyd i swydd - ei chael hi'n anodd dod o hyd i swydd sy'n cynnig cyflog ac amodau da, sy'n cael trafferth dod o hyd i swydd gyda sicrwydd oriau. Mae'n bosib y gallai'r amodau hynny wella ar ôl inni gael rhywbeth sy'n cyfyngu ar y cyflenwad diddiwedd o lafur rhad, megis polisi mewnfudo priodol. Efallai y gallaf ofyn ichi a ydych chi'n cydnabod y posibilrwydd yma. Rydych chi'n dweud mai esgus oedd datgan y gallem ni adfer rheolaeth dros ein ffiniau. Felly, a ydych chi'n credu na all Llywodraeth y DU obeithio i reoli ei ffiniau, ac a ydych chi'n credu y byddai hynny'n sefyllfa dda i fod ynddi? Rydych chi'n dweud, os na all Prif Weinidog y DU sicrhau cytundeb, y dylai hi ofyn am estyniad, fel y gallwn ni gael etholiad cyffredinol neu bleidlais gyhoeddus - mewn geiriau eraill, refferendwm arall. Beth fyddai diben y naill bosibilrwydd neu'r llall, rwy'n gofyn i fy hun: etholiad cyffredinol fel y gallai'r Blaid Lafur - y Blaid Lafur Cenedlaethol, o dan arweiniad Jeremy Corbyn, sydd gyda'r mwyaf taer dros adael - gyflwyno cynnig arall nad yw'n mynd â ni ymlaen, oherwydd nid oes neb yn gwybod beth mewn gwirionedd yw safbwynt Llafur yn San Steffan. Y tro diwethaf, fe wnaethon nhw arddel polisi o barchu canlyniad y refferendwm a gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd. Felly, beth am bleidlais gyhoeddus arall? Pam, pan fydd hynny ynddo ei hun yn golygu anwybyddu'r mandad clir a gafwyd yn yr un diwethaf, nad yw wedi ei weithredu eto, ac, o dan eich fformiwla, efallai na fydd e byth? Pleidleisiodd y DU i adael, ac felly hefyd Cymru. Mae angen inni roi'r gorau i'r petruso yma a gadael yr UE ymhen 10 wythnos. Bydd 17 miliwn o bobl yn cymeradwyo pan wnawn ni hynny.