English: At the beginning, I would like to thank all of those people who are working tirelessly in so many sectors to keep us safe. The very public thanks at the beginning of the pandemic was a clear characteristic of that time, and we need to sincerely thank those people again. So, turning to the motion, it is a sensible motion on the whole, I have to say. I don't agree with everything in it, but it is a sensible motion. I can't help but draw attention to the irony of who put forward the motion and some of the comments that we've heard from the Conservatives. It's fair to say that the Welsh Government has been at its best in this pandemic when it has not been tied to the activity and attitude of the Conservative Government in Westminster. I hope that the Conservative Members in Senedd Cymru agree with me that mistakes or confusion in the messages from Boris Johnson and his Government have been very damaging in the battle to keep deaths down. From rushing back to normality when that wasn't possible to, of course, one prominent figure ignoring the restrictions. There's been an opinion poll that suggested that Dominic Cummings's behaviour had been a turning point in public attitudes. It was seen as a licence for people to do whatever they wanted to do, and I'm sure that has cost lives. Also, if I may say, we have a motion here, a sensible one, that is encouraging the Government to be sensible, but the materials that have been published by the Conservatives on social media, the tweets and the memes and so on, suggest a kind of bravado that is contrary to this sensible and responsible approach that's being encouraged. I'll turn to the amendments. We reject amendment 1 because we believe that the international evidence has shown for a long time that face coverings can be a very important tool in the battle against the virus. They're not enough in and of themselves, of course, but we don't understand why the Welsh Government has been so slow in compelling the use of face coverings in shops and so on. But better late than never in that regard. We know that there is room to extend this further, but once again the Government has rejected this, and we are not entirely sure why. Turning to amendment 2, our first amendment - I think it's self-explanatory. Let us learn lessons about international travel and its impact on the spread of the virus, because it's obvious that there is a problem here, and that we do need to understand that better. Now, amendment 3, the Government's amendment - we won't be supporting that. I think that, in reality, there has been a practical problem, yes, in testing every traveller, but as technology develops, as capacity is increased, and in being aware of the problems with travellers returning from abroad, there is genuine value in the principle of testing every traveller. Amendment 4 - we agree with that. We have been calling for accommodation to be provided for those who are quarantining and self-isolating to safeguard families. It's important for those families and those extended families, of course. We've seen wide-ranging use of this kind of facility in places such as Italy and China. And the other four amendments are from Plaid Cymru. Amendment 5, as I've noted - we support the wearing of face coverings. We can't understand why we wouldn't do that. Amendment 6 calls for a new COVID plan. We're constantly learning. We need a plan that reflects the change in our understanding of the disease and what activities and locations are dangerous. I haven't been convinced that the plan for the winter that was published yesterday reflects the latest science. Amendment 7 - again, it's self-explanatory, and is something that Labour in Westminster hasn't had any problem in calling for. So, hopefully Labour will support it here in Wales as well. We need greater testing capacity. We've seen this over the past few weeks. We need greater capacity in Wales so that the Welsh Government has control over the ability to provide for the population here. Amendment 8 - at a time when an entire council area, Rhondda Cynon Taf in this instance, has been placed under new restrictions, we do believe that looking at smart local lockdowns is something that genuinely needs to be considered. A general lockdown is certainly damaging, and by now I think we do have the ability to target these restrictions. So, there we are. So, a few comments on where we are at the moment -
Welsh: Ar y dechrau fel hyn, mi fuaswn i'n licio dweud 'diolch' unwaith eto i'r holl bobl hynny sydd yn gweithio'n ddiflino mewn cymaint o sectorau i'n cadw ni yn ddiogel. Mi oedd y diolch cyhoeddus iawn yna ar ddechrau'r pandemig yn nodwedd amlwg iawn yn y cyfnod hwnnw. Mae'n bwysig bod pobl yn gwybod bod y diolch mor ddiffuant rŵan hefyd. At y cynnig, mae o'n gynnig digon synhwyrol ar y cyfan, mae'n rhaid dweud. Dwi ddim yn cytuno efo popeth ynddo fo, ond mae o'n gynnig synhwyrol iawn. Allaf i ddim peidio â thynnu sylw at yr eironi o bwy wnaeth ei gyflwyno fo a rhai o'r sylwadau rydyn ni wedi eu clywed gan y Blaid Geidwadol. Teg dweud bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi bod ar eu gorau yn y pandemig yma pan maen nhw wedi peidio â chael eu clymu i weithgarwch ac agwedd y Llywodraeth Geidwadol yn San Steffan. Dwi'n gobeithio bod yr Aelodau Ceidwadol yn Senedd Cymru yn cytuno efo fi fod camgymeriadau neu ddryswch yn y negeseuon gan Lywodraeth Boris Johnson wedi bod yn niweidiol iawn yn y frwydr i gadw nifer y marwolaethau i lawr. O ruthro i annog normalrwydd pan oedd hynny ddim yn bosib i, wrth gwrs, un ffigwr blaenllaw yn arbennig yn anwybyddu rheolau'r cyfnod clo. Dwi'n meddwl bod yr holl dystiolaeth o'r arolygon barn yn awgrymu bod ymddygiad Dominic Cummings rai misoedd yn ôl wedi bod yn drobwynt mewn agweddau cyhoeddus. Cafodd ei weld fel trwydded i bobl eraill wneud beth y mynnon nhw, a dwi'n siŵr bod hynny wedi costio bywydau yn y pen draw. A hefyd, os caf i ddweud, mae gennym ni gynnig yn fan hyn, un synhwyrol fel dwi yn ei ddweud, yn annog y Llywodraeth i fod yn bwyllog, ond mae'r deunydd sydd wedi cael ei gyhoeddi dros y misoedd diwethaf gan Geidwadwyr Cymru ar y cyfryngau cymdeithasol, yn drydariadau neu'n memes ac ati, wedi awgrymu rhyw brafado cwbl groes i beth allai gael ei alw'n agwedd bwyllog neu gyfrifol. Fe wnaf i droi at y gwelliannau yn eu trefn. Rydyn ni'n gwrthod gwelliant 1 achos rydyn ni'n credu bod y dystiolaeth ryngwladol wedi dangos ers talwm bellach fod gorchuddion wyneb yn gallu bod yn arf pwysig iawn yn y frwydr yn erbyn y feirws. Dydyn nhw ddim yn ddigon ynddyn nhw eu hunain, wrth reswm, ond dydyn ni ddim yn deall pam fod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi bod mor araf yn cyflwyno gorfodaeth i'w gwisgo nhw mewn rhai llefydd cyhoeddus, siopau ac yn y blaen. Rŵan, gwell hwyr na hwyrach o ran hynny, ond rydyn ni yn meddwl bod yna le i ymestyn hyn, ond unwaith eto, mae'r Llywodraeth yn gwrthod. Dwi ddim cweit yn siŵr pam. At welliant 2, ein gwelliant cyntaf ni - mae o'n hunanesboniadol, dwi'n credu. Gadewch inni ddysgu gwersi am deithio rhyngwladol a'i effaith o ar ledaeniad y feirws, achos mae'n hollol amlwg bod yna broblem yma, ac rydyn ni angen trio deall hynny yn well. Gwelliant 3, gwelliant y Llywodraeth - fyddwn ni ddim yn cefnogi hwn. Dwi'n meddwl, mewn realiti, fod problem ymarferol, oes, mewn profi pob teithiwr, ond wrth i dechnoleg ddatblygu, wrth i gapasiti gael ei gynyddu, ac o wybod y problemau efo teithwyr yn dychwelyd o dramor, mae yna werth go iawn i'r egwyddor o brofi pob teithiwr, heb os. Gwelliant 4 - rydyn ni'n cytuno efo hwn. Rydyn ninnau wedi bod yn galw am ddarparu llety i'r rhai sy'n hunanynysu fel ffordd o amddiffyn y teulu ehangach. Mae'n bwysig iawn i deuluoedd ac aelwydydd mawr yn arbennig, ac rydyn ni'n gweld bod defnydd eang wedi bod ar y math yma o beth mewn llefydd fel yr Eidal a Tsieina. Ac mae'r pedwar gwelliant arall wedyn gan Blaid Cymru. Gwelliant 5 - fel dwi wedi nodi, rydyn ni'n cefnogi ymestyn gwisgo gorchuddion wyneb. Dydyn ni ddim yn gallu deall pam na fyddem ni'n gwneud hynny. Mae gwelliant 6 yn galw am gynllun COVID newydd. Rydyn ni'n dysgu o hyd. Mae angen cynllun, dwi'n meddwl, sydd yn adlewyrchu'r newid yn ein dealltwriaeth ni o'r clefyd a pha leoliadau a pha weithgareddau sydd yn beryglus, a pha rai sydd ddim. Dwi ddim wedi fy argyhoeddi bod y cynllun ar gyfer y gaeaf a gafodd ei gyhoeddi ddoe yn adlewyrchu'r wyddoniaeth ddiweddaraf. Gwelliant 7 - unwaith eto, mae'n hunanesboniadol, a'n rhywbeth nad yw Llafur yn San Steffan wedi cael unrhyw broblem wrth alw amdano fo. Felly, gobeithio y gwnaiff Llafur ei gefnogi o yma yng Nghymru hefyd. Mae angen mwy o gapasiti profi arnon ni. Rydyn ni wedi gweld hynny dros yr wythnosau diwethaf. Mae angen mwy o gapasiti hefyd yng Nghymru fel bod yna reolaeth gan Lywodraeth Cymru dros eu gallu i ddarparu ar gyfer y boblogaeth yma. A gwelliant 8 - ar ddiwrnod lle mae ardal cyngor gyfan arall, Rhondda Cynon Taf y tro yma, wedi cael ei rhoi mewn cyfnod o gyfyngiadau dwys newydd, rydyn ni'n credu bod edrych ar smart local lockdowns yn rhywbeth sydd wir angen ei ystyried. Mi fyddai clo cyffredinol arall yn sicr yn niweidiol iawn, ac erbyn hyn dwi'n credu bod y gallu gennym ni i dargedu'r cyfyngiadau. Felly, dyna ni. Ambell sylw ar le yr ydyn ni ar hyn o bryd -