techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I believe there is, yes. Peter -
Welsh: Oes, rydw i'n credu bod. Peter -
English: Great. We move on to the final section. Suzy Davies - thank you very much.
Welsh: Grêt. Rydym yn symud ymlaen at yr adran olaf. Suzy Davies - diolch yn fawr iawn.
English: Thank you. We're back in public session for item 3. We're moving on to the historic environment, and this is evidence session 8, and welcome once again to the Minister for Culture, Tourism and Sport, to Jason Thomas, director of culture, sport and tourism, and also to Gwilym Hughes, who is assistant director of the historic environment. Thank you very much to you all for staying with us, and also for joining us. As you know, we have different themes on which we will be asking questions, and we move on to the first theme, which is the implementation of the Historic Environment (Wales) Act 2016, and Siân Gwenllian will start.
Welsh: Diolch. Rydym mewn sesiwn gyhoeddus unwaith eto, eitem 3, ac rydym yn symud ymlaen yn awr at yr amgylchedd hanesyddol, sesiwn dystiolaeth 8, a chroeso eto i'r Gweinidog Diwylliant, Chwaraeon a Thwristiaeth, Jason Thomas, sef cyfarwyddwr diwylliant, chwaraeon a thwristiaeth, a hefyd i Gwilym Hughes, sef dirprwy gyfarwyddwr yr amgylchedd hanesyddol. Diolch yn fawr iawn i chi am aros gyda ni, a hefyd am ymuno â ni hefyd. Fel rydych yn gwybod, mae yna themâu gwahanol gyda ni o ran cwestiynau, ac rydym yn symud i'r sesiwn gyntaf, sef gweithredu Deddf yr Amgylchedd Hanesyddol (Cymru) 2016, a Siân Gwenllian sydd i gychwyn.
English: Thank you. The evidence that we received from the bodies related to this particular area is that it's a little bit too early, truth to be told, to see how the Act is being implemented at a grass-roots level. But one suggestion was that perhaps we need to bring all of the legislation together in a consolidation Bill, and a further suggestion that was made was perhaps we don't need to go through a legislative process to do that, but it would be possible to draw the information together as a kind of editorial exercise, and that this area could be used as a pilot for doing that kind of work in the Assembly. What's your opinion on that?
Welsh: Diolch. Y dystiolaeth gawsom ni gan y mudiadau a'r cyrff sydd yn gysylltiedig â'r maes yma oedd ei bod hi dipyn bach yn gynnar, mewn gwirionedd, i weld sut mae'r Ddeddf yn gweithredu ar lawr gwlad. Ac un awgrym oedd efallai bod angen dod â'r holl ddeddfwriaeth ynghyd i mewn i ryw fath o Fil cydgrynhoi, ac awgrym pellach a gafwyd oedd efallai bod dim angen mynd drwy broses ddeddfwriaethol ond bod modd tynnu'r wybodaeth at ei gilydd fel rhyw fath o ymarfer golygyddol, ac y gellid defnyddio'r maes yma fel peilot ar gyfer gwneud y math yna o waith o fewn y Cynulliad. Nid wyf yn gwybod beth ydy eich barn chi ar hynny.
English: Thank you very much for the opportunity to discuss the historic environment, which has brought a great deal of joy to me throughout my life given where I have resided. Also, as a member of the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee of this place in the past, I have considered the issues surrounding consolidating legislation, and we are expecting a statement today from the Counsel General in this particular area in terms of the consultation that's taken place on interpreting Welsh legislation. And therefore I don't want to close off the possibility of responding to the suggestion in that question, because it does depend on how the Counsel General will want to take this work forward. But simplifying legislation for those who are required to respond to that legislation, including, of course, the owners of many historic buildings where there can be complications in terms of the balance between maintaining historic buildings, which materials can be used in monuments now and their use for the future - all of these questions are questions that the owners of historic buildings and estates deserve support on in terms of their activity, by simplifying legislation and making it accessible. As it happens, I do have a very colourful set of documents here on the management of listed properties in Wales, and I'm sure Gwilym would be very happy for me to share these documents with you as a committee if you haven't had an opportunity to see them already, and, as you can see, there is a wonderful picture of Harlech castle on one of them. So, we will share those with you.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr am y cyfle i drafod yr amgylchedd hanesyddol, sydd wedi dod â llawer o foddhad i mi ar hyd fy oes o ystyried lle rydw i wedi byw. Rydw i hefyd, fel aelod yn y gorffennol o'r Pwyllgor Materion Cyfansoddiadol a Deddfwriaethol yn y lle yma, wedi ystyried y materion o gydgrynhoi deddfwriaeth, ac rydym yn disgwyl datganiad heddiw gan y Cwnsler Cyffredinol yn y maes yma ynglŷn â'r ymgynghoriad sydd wedi bod ar ddehongli deddfwriaeth Cymru. Ac felly nid wyf am gau fy meddwl i'r awgrym sydd yn y cwestiwn yna, oherwydd mae o'n dibynnu ar sut bydd y Cwnsler Cyffredinol am gymryd y gwaith yma yn ei flaen. Mae symleiddio deddfwriaeth ar gyfer y sawl sydd yn gorfod ymateb i'r ddeddfwriaeth yna, gan gynnwys, wrth gwrs, perchnogion llawer iawn o adeiladau hanesyddol lle mae yna gymhlethdod yn gallu bod ynglŷn â chydbwyso rhwng cynnal a chadw adeilad hanesyddol, pa ddefnyddiau y gellir eu rhoi i henebion ac yn y blaen yn gyfoes a beth yw eu dibenion nhw at y dyfodol - mae'r cwestiynau yma yn gwestiynau y mae perchnogion adeiladau hanesyddol ac ystadau hanesyddol yn haeddu cefnogaeth arnyn nhw yn y gweithgaredd maen nhw'n ei wneud, drwy wneud deddfwriaeth yn syml ac yn hygyrch. Fel mae'n digwydd bod, mae gen i gasgliad lliwgar iawn gerbron ynglŷn â rheoli adeiladau rhestredig yng Nghymru, ac rwy'n sicr y byddai Gwilym yn hapus iawn i ni rannu y dogfennau yma i gyd efo chi fel pwyllgor os nad ydych chi wedi cael cyfle i'w darllen nhw, ac, fel y gwelwch chi, mae yna lun ardderchog o Gastell Harlech ar un ohonyn nhw. Mi wnawn ni rhannu'r ddogfen yna.
English: Thank you. One other area that has caused concern is the preservation notices, with the Country Land and Business Association saying that it would make things worse, setting these preservation notices on at-risk buildings. Have you thought about that further? Will there be consultation before introducing these preservation notices?
Welsh: Iawn, diolch. Un adran sydd wedi achosi pryder ydy'r hysbysiadau diogelu, efo Cymdeithas Tir a Busnesau Cefn Gwlad yn dweud, er enghraifft, y byddai fo'n gwneud pethau'n waeth, gosod hysbysiadau diogelu ar adeiladau sydd mewn risg. A oes yna feddwl wedi mynd ar hynny? A fydd yna ymgynghori cyn cyflwyno'r hysbysiadau diogelu yma?
English: Well, there will be, yes. I should perhaps declare an interest. I am a member of the CLA, although our estate is little more than 0.5 hectares. But I understand the concern. I understand the concern about buildings that have been in decline, where maintenance and improvements are required in order for those buildings to be used. But these preservation notices would only be implemented in the gravest circumstances. And the necessary questions in these circumstances are whether a building can be reused because of the nature of its structure, and whether there is a viable economic future for the use of the building. And we are endeavouring to ensure that the changes introduced as a result of the historic environment Act are legislation and changes - that owners of buildings that may be open to preservation notices are aware of the potential of seeing these notices as an opportunity to redevelop their buildings appropriately.
Welsh: Wel, 'bydd', ydy'r ateb i hynny. Mae'n debyg y dylwn i ddatgan diddordeb hefyd. Rydw i yn aelod o gymdeithas y tirfeddianwyr, er nad yw'n hystâd ni yn fwy na rhyw 0.5 hectar. Ond rydw i'n deall y consýrn. Rydw i'n deall y consýrn ynglŷn ag adeiladau sydd wedi dirywio ac mewn cyflwr y mae angen eu gwella nhw ar gyfer eu defnyddio nhw. A dim ond mewn sefyllfa ddifrifol y mae'r cynigion yma yn cael eu gweithredu. A'r cwestiynau angenrheidiol yn y sefyllfa yma ydy: a oes modd ailddefnyddio adeilad oherwydd natur ei strwythur, a oes yna ddyfodol economaidd heddiw i ddefnydd o'r adeilad? Ac rydym ni yn ceisio sicrhau bod y newidiadau sydd yn dilyn y Ddeddf amgylchedd hanesyddol yn ddeddfwriaeth - y bydd perchnogion adeiladau, yn enwedig adeiladau a allai fod yn agored i rybudd i'w diogelu, yn ymwybodol o'r potensial o weld y rhybuddion yma fel cyfle i ail-ddatblygu eu hadeiladau yn briodol.
English: And, if I may add, I'm very willing to make a commitment to meet my neighbour, who at the moment is the chair of the CLA in Wales, to discuss these issues in full.
Welsh: Os caf i ychwanegu, rydw i'n barod iawn i wneud ymrwymiad i gyfarfod â fy nghymydog, sydd, ar hyn o bryd beth bynnag, yn llywyddu cymdeithas y tirfeddianwyr yng Nghymru, i drafod y materion yma yn llawn.
English: Moving on to protection for place names, the Act makes it a requirement to maintain a register, but this isn't a statutory register. Do you have any intention to think more about the need for a statutory register? There has been some debate about this. I wonder whether there will be a change of direction.
Welsh: Symud at faes diogelu enwau lleoedd, mae'r Ddeddf yn ei gwneud hi'n orfodol i gadw rhestr, ond nid yw hon yn rhestr statudol. A oes gennych chi unrhyw fwriad i feddwl rhagor ynglŷn â'r angen am restr statudol? Mae dadlau wedi bod am hyn. Tybed a oes newid cyfeiriad yn mynd i fod.
English: It depends what you mean by 'statutory'. This list is one that was established on the basis of the legislation. It was launched earlier this year. The register is maintained for us as Ministers by an organisation I'm a keen supporter of, the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Wales. I think that there are 350,000 names on the list at the moment, and there is a full-time employee responsible for dealing with the work of adding to that list, and of engendering public interest in the importance of place names.
Welsh: Mae'n dibynnu ar beth yr ydych chi'n ei feddwl wrth 'statudol'. Mae'r rhestr yma yn rhestr sydd wedi cael ei sefydlu ar sail y ddeddfwriaeth. Fe'i lansiwyd hi yn gynharach eleni. Mae'r rhestr yn cael ei chynnal ar ein cyfer ni fel Gweinidogion gan gorff rydw i'n gefnogwr brwd iddo fo, Comisiwn Brenhinol Henebion Cymru. Mae yna, rydw i'n credu, 350,000 o enwau ar y rhestr, ac mae yna berson amser llawn yn gyfrifol am ymwneud â'r gwaith o gynyddu a lledu'r rhestr, ac o gynyddu diddordeb cyhoeddus ym mhwysigrwydd enwau llefydd.
English: But there's no statutory protection for the names, is there? Because anyone could decide to change one of the names, even though it's on the register, and there would be no implications as a result of that.
Welsh: Ond nid oes gwarchodaeth statudol i'r enwau, nac oes? Achos byddai rhywun yn medru penderfynu newid un o'r enwau, er ei fod o ar y gofrestr, ac ni fyddai goblygiadau i hynny.
English: No. Well, that was the Government's decision following the discussion on this issue. And, if you recall, I supported the Government, before becoming a member of it, on this point.
Welsh: Na. Wel, dyna oedd penderfyniad y Llywodraeth yn dilyn y drafodaeth a fu ar y mater hwn. Ac, os cofiwch chi, mi oeddwn i'n cefnogi'r Llywodraeth, cyn i mi fod yn aelod ohoni, ar y pwynt yma.
English: So, there'll be no movement on that.
Welsh: Felly, nid oes symud yn mynd i fod ar hwn.
English: No, because there are grave constitutional principles in terms of human rights, I would say, without going too far in that direction, related to people's right to name places. What we're eager to see is that the good practice in terms of preserving historic Welsh names, or changing historic English names, sometimes, to Welsh - that that can happen. There have been discussions with the language commissioner, and we will continue to discuss those issues. But I do agree - if that was your question - that it isn't appropriate to require people to name buildings or locations by specific names. In a multilingual nation, I do think we have to be open to the kind of historic changes that have happened over the years, although I welcome the fact that it appears - I believe it appears, at least - that there is more desire to change names into Welsh than vice versa. I'm not sure if that's accurate, Gwilym, or is that something that I have imagined in a dream?
Welsh: Nac oes, oherwydd mae yna egwyddorion cyfansoddiadol difrifol ynglŷn â hawliau dynol, buaswn i'n dweud, heb fynd yn rhy bell i'r cyfeiriad yna, ynglŷn â hawl pobl i enwi llefydd. Beth rydym ni'n awyddus i weld yw bod yr arfer da ynglŷn â pharhau gydag enwau hanesyddol Cymraeg, neu newid enwau hanesyddol Saesneg, weithiau, i enwau Cymraeg - fod hyn yn gallu digwydd. Mae yna drafodaethau wedi bod efo'r comisiynydd iaith, ac mi fyddwn ni'n parhau i drafod ynglŷn â hynny. Ond rydw i'n cytuno - os mai dyna ydy'r cwestiwn - nad ydy hi'n briodol i orfodi pobl i alw adeiladau neu leoliadau o dan enwau penodol. Mewn gwlad amlieithog, rydw i'n meddwl bod yn rhaid i ni fod yn agored i'r math o newidiadau hanesyddol sydd wedi digwydd dros y blynyddoedd, er rydw i'n croesawu'r ffaith ei bod hi'n ymddangos - rydw i'n credu ei bod hi'n ymddangos - bod yna fwy o awydd i newid enwau i'r Gymraeg na fel arall. Nid ydw i'n siŵr a ydy hynny'n gywir, Gwilym, neu ai rhywbeth yr ydw i wedi dychmygu mewn breuddwyd oedd hynny?
English: As one who has Glynllifon in my constituency, which was almost changed to Wynnborn - you'll know that my opinion differs to yours. Just two quick questions: could you give us an update on the advisory panel, please, and also the heritage partnership agreements? Where have we reached with those two things?
Welsh: Fel un sydd efo Glynllifon yn ei hetholaeth, a wnaeth bron iawn gael ei newid i Wynnborn - rydych chi'n gwybod bod fy marn i yn wahanol i'ch un chi. Jest dau gwestiwn sydyn: diweddariad ynglŷn â'r panel cynghori, os gwelwch yn dda, a hefyd y cytundebau partneriaeth treftadaeth. Ble ydym ni arni efo'r ddau beth yna?
English: Just on that, I hear that the intention is that the draft documents will be out for public consultation in 2018.
Welsh: Jest ar hynny, rydw i'n gobeithio - rydw i'n deall mai'r bwriad ydy y bydd y dogfennau drafft allan ar gyfer ymgynghori cyhoeddus yn 2018.
English: I'm right, then. That remains the timetable, therefore.
Welsh: Rydw i'n iawn - dyna fo. Mae hynny'n parhau ar amser, felly.
English: And the panel?
Welsh: A'r panel, wedyn?
English: The advisory panel.
Welsh: Y panel cynghori.
English: Perhaps I should make it clear that I'm not a fan of advisory panels. I prefer to get out there and find those people who know, listen to them and try and respond. But I do accept that work has already been done in this area, and that there is a commitment within the legislation for this to happen. But I don't want to create a precedent of too many advisory panels, as may have existed in the past within Government, if I may say that. I don't think that advisory panels, of necessity, offer the best advisory response or promote swift and effective decision making. But I think the decision on Cadw is going to be crucial to the way in which we, as a department, will operate, namely to retain that work within Government but giving more freedom for that work to happen. Certainly, I will be seeking the best possible advice, however that may appear, and it may not be a stable advisory panel in the traditional sense.
Welsh: Efallai y dylwn i ei wneud yn glir nad ydw i yn ffan o baneli ymgynghorol. Mae'n well gen i fynd allan a ffeindio'r bobl sy'n gwybod, gwrando arnyn nhw a cheisio ymateb wedyn. Ond rydw i yn derbyn bod yna waith wedi cael ei wneud yn y fan hyn yn barod, a bod yna ymrwymiad o fewn y Ddeddf i hyn allu digwydd. Ond nid ydw i eisiau creu cynsail o ormod o baneli ymgynghorol, fel sydd, o bosibl, wedi bod yn y gorffennol mewn Llywodraeth, os caf i ddweud hynny. Nid ydw i'n credu bod paneli ymgynghorol o angenrheidrwydd yn cynnig yr ymateb ymgynghorol gorau, nac ychwaith yn hyrwyddo penderfyniadau cyflym ac effeithlon. Ond rydw i'n meddwl bod y penderfyniad ar Cadw yn mynd i fod yn allweddol i'r ffordd y byddwn ni, fel adran, yn gweithredu, sef cadw gwaith o fewn Llywodraeth ond rhoi mwy o ryddid i'r gwaith yna ddigwydd. Yn sicr, mi fyddwn ni'n chwilio am y cyngor gorau posibl, sut bynnag y bydd hynny yn ymddangos. Efallai nid panel sefydlog ymgynghorol yn y ffordd draddodiadol fyddai'r ffordd orau i weithredu.
English: We look forward to that.
Welsh: Mi wnawn ni edrych ymlaen at hynny, felly.
English: If there are any further questions that we didn't have time to ask today, we will write to you, if that's okay, and I think you've agreed to send a little bit more information on some particular themes in the first session as well. Thank you very much for giving evidence today, and I'm sure we'll see you again in future. Thank you very much.
Welsh: Ocê. Os oes unrhyw gwestiynau ychwanegol nad oeddem wedi cael amser i'w gofyn, byddwn ni yn ysgrifennu atoch chi, os yw hynny'n iawn, ac rwy'n credu eich bod chi wedi cytuno i anfon mwy o wybodaeth atom ni ar rai pethau yn y sesiwn cyntaf hefyd. Diolch yn fawr iawn i chi am roi tystiolaeth i ni heddiw, ac maen siŵr y gwnawn ni eich gweld chi eto yn y dyfodol. Diolch yn fawr iawn.
English: We'll move on to item 4, papers to note. Paper 4.1: the Welsh Government budget 2018-19 and a letter from the Chair to the Ministers, namely Kirsty Williams, Dafydd Elis-Thomas and Eluned Morgan. Paper 4.2, Welsh Language Commissioner: Welsh-medium childcare and early years provision briefing note.
Welsh: Symudwn ymlaen at eitem 4, papurau i'w nodi. Papur 4.1: cyllideb Llywodraeth Cymru ar gyfer 2017-18, llythyrau gan y Cadeirydd at y Gweinidogion, sef Kirsty Williams, Dafydd Elis-Thomas ac Eluned Morgan. Wedyn papur 4.2, Comisiynydd y Gymraeg: nodyn briffio am ddarpariaeth y blynyddoedd cynnar a gofal plant cyfrwng Cymraeg.
English: Can I raise a point about the letter from the Welsh Language Commissioner - the briefing note on Welsh-medium childcare and early years provision? Can I just draw your attention to the main message of this report, which does cause a great deal of concern to me? The report says: 'Although the Welsh Government is aware of the importance of childcare to the future of the language' - the Welsh language - 'there are no specific and firm plans on how they intend to integrate the 30 Hours Scheme' - the childcare scheme - 'and the 2050 vision. It is unclear how the Welsh Government intends to move from general commitments to increase Welsh medium childcare provision to specific actions which will have an impact on the ground.' I think that it is appropriate for us to be scrutinising this particular area as a matter of urgency. Is there an opportunity to do that? Is the Minister -
Welsh: A allaf godi pwynt ynglŷn â'r llythyr gan Gomisiynydd y Gymraeg - y nodyn briffio am ddarpariaeth blynyddol cynnar a gofal plant cyfrwng Cymraeg? A gaf fi jest tynnu eich sylw chi at brif neges yr adroddiad yma sydd yn peri pryder mawr i mi? Mae'r adroddiad yn dweud: 'Er bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn ymwybodol o bwysigrwydd gofal plant i ddyfodol yr iaith' - yr iaith Gymraeg - 'nid oes cynlluniau pendant a chadarn ynglŷn â sut y bwriedir integreiddio'r Cynllun 30 Awr' - gofal plant - 'a'r weledigaeth 2050. Nid yw'n eglur sut y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn bwriadu troi ymrwymiadau cyffredinol i gynyddu'r ddarpariaeth gofal plant cyfrwng Cymraeg yn weithredoedd penodolar lawr gwlad.' Rwy'n meddwl ei fod yn briodol inni fod yn craffu ar y maes yma ar fyrder. Mae yna gyfle i wneud hynny, mae'n debyg. A ydy'r Gweinidog -
English: We're looking at our forward work programme next week, as a committee, so I think that is something that we could consider as part of that. But if Members do want to respond by letter in the short term, that is something that we can do. Adam has a comment to make.
Welsh: Rŷm ni'n edrych ar gylch gwaith y dyfodol yr wythnos nesaf, fel pwyllgor, felly, rwy'n credu bod hynny'n rhywbeth rŷm ni'n gallu considro yn rhan o hynny. Ond os yw Aelodau eisiau gwneud llythyr yn ôl yn y tymor byr, mae hwnnw'n rhywbeth y gallwn ei wneud hefyd. Mae gan Adam, fel clerc, rywbeth i'w ddweud.
English: So, there is an opportunity to scrutinise the Minister on this particular area in January.
Welsh: Felly, mae yna gyfle i graffu ar y Gweinidog ar y maes penodol yma yn mis Ionawr.
English: Are there any further comments on the letters? No.
Welsh: Grêt. A oes unrhyw sylwadau eraill ar y llythyrau? Na.
English: So, under item 5, I'll move, under Standing Order 17.42, to exclude the public from the meeting for the remaining items. Is everyone content? Thank you.
Welsh: Felly, o dan eitem 5, rwy'n cynnig o dan Reol Sefydlog 17.42 i wahardd y cyhoedd o'r cyfarfod ar gyfer yr eitemau sy'n weddill. A ydy pawb yn hapus gyda hynny? Diolch.
English: The first item on our agenda this afternoon is questions to the Cabinet Secretary for Finance. And the first question, Mick Antoniw.
Welsh: Yr eitem gyntaf ar ein hagenda ni'r prynhawn yma yw'r cwestiynau i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Gyllid. A'r cwestiwn cyntaf, Mick Antoniw.
English: Llywydd, the Trade Bill includes a proposed agreement on Government procurement, known as a plurilateral agreement within the World Trade Organization framework. The Bill provides Welsh Ministers with regulation-making powers when implementing such an agreement in devolved areas.
Welsh: Lywydd, mae'r Bil Masnach yn cynnwys cytundeb arfaethedig ar weithgarwch caffael y Llywodraeth, a elwir yn gytundeb amlwladol o fewn fframwaith Sefydliad Masnach y Byd. Mae'r Bil yn darparu pwerau i Weinidogion Cymru wneud rheoliadau wrth weithredu cytundeb o'r fath ar waith mewn meysydd datganoledig.
English: Thank you for that answer, Cabinet Secretary. You may recall we had quite a lot of discussion, pre referendum, on the issue of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and external trade agreements, and the implications for Welsh procurement, the Welsh national health service, and so on. And it appears that, although the red rag was being proposed that, if we didn't leave the European Union, we'd be presented with an EU TTIP, it looks that the Trade Bill now has the implications of imposing a UK TTIP on Wales, with very little scrutiny, using the royal prerogative, with only a certain level of governmental scrutiny on it. Do you agree with me that the Bill, as it's drawn at the moment, is not something we can give legislative consent to, and do you also share some of the concerns I have about the way this Bill can abuse some of the policies that we are supporting within Wales?
Welsh: Diolch am eich ateb, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet. Efallai eich bod yn cofio i ni gael cryn dipyn o drafodaeth, cyn y refferendwm, ar y Bartneriaeth Masnach a Buddsoddiad Trawsiwerydd a chytundebau masnach allanol, a goblygiadau hynny ar gyfer caffael yng Nghymru, gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol Cymru ac ati. Ac ymddengys, er i ni gael ein rhybuddio, pe na baem yn gadael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, y byddai'r UE yn cyflwyno Partneriaeth Masnach a Buddsoddiad Trawsiwerydd ar ein cyfer, ymddengys bellach y bydd y Bil Masnach yn arwain at y DU yn cyflwyno Partneriaeth Masnach a Buddsoddiad Trawsiwerydd ar gyfer Cymru, gyda fawr iawn o waith craffu, gan ddefnyddio'r uchelfraint frenhinol, gyda lefel benodol o waith craffu llywodraethol arno yn unig. A ydych yn cytuno â mi nad yw'r Bil, fel y'i lluniwyd ar hyn o bryd, yn rhywbeth y gallwn roi cydsyniad deddfwriaethol iddo, ac a ydych hefyd yn rhannu rhai o fy mhryderon ynglŷn â'r ffordd y gall y Bil hwn gamddefnyddio rhai o'r polisïau rydym yn eu cefnogi yng Nghymru?