techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I agree with the spirit behind those comments and I welcome them, but talking plainly here, I don't think that my job as one of the Ministers of Wales is to lobby Westminster. My job is to show their hypocrisy, and to say that their behaviour is completely unacceptable and unjust to older people in Wales and in the rest of the United Kingdom. The way that they have accepted and used - [ Interruption.] Excuse me. I don't think that you may - [ Interruption. ] Thank you. Therefore, I'm of the opinion that the way that they have used the benefits system, namely credits in general, as a way of restoring some sort of means test - something that we've criticised in this place in the past - as a way of proving that older people deserve being able to receive a broadcasting service without having to pay for a licence fee in addition, and then, in doing so, they have undermined the freedom that was available for general broadcasting and have emphasised that there's some sort of new relationship being established between the benefits system and deserving a broadcasting service. I think that that also is an issue that we need to reveal and oppose clearly.
Welsh: Dwi'n cytuno â'r ysbryd tu ôl i'r sylwadau yna, ac yn eu croesawu nhw, ond a siarad yn hollol blaen, dwi ddim yn credu mai fy swydd i fel un o Weinidogion Cymru ydy lobio San Steffan. Fy swydd i ydy dangos eu rhagrith nhw, a dweud bod eu hymddygiad nhw yn gwbl annerbyniol ac yn anghyfiawn i bobl hŷn yng Nghymru ac yng ngweddill y Deyrnas Unedig. Mae'r ffordd y maen nhw wedi derbyn a defnyddio - [ Torri ar draws.] Esgusodwch fi. Dwi ddim yn credu bod modd i chi - [ Torri ar draws.] Thank you. Ac felly, rydw i o'r farn bod y modd y maen nhw wedi defnyddio'r drefn nawdd cymdeithasol, sef credyd cyffredinol, fel adfer math o brawf moddion - rhywbeth rydym ni wedi'i feirniadu yn y lle hwn yn y gorffennol - fel ffordd o brofi bod henoed yn haeddu gallu cael y darlledu heb eu bod nhw'n gorfod talu am drwydded yn ychwanegol, ac yna, wrth wneud hynny, maen nhw wedi tanseilio'r rhyddid oedd i'w gael ar gyfer darlledu cyffredinol ac wedi pwysleisio bod yna ryw berthynas newydd wedi cael ei sefydlu rhwng nawdd cymdeithasol a haeddu gwasanaethau darlledu. Dwi'n meddwl bod hwnnw, hefyd, yn fater y mae angen i ni ei ddatgelu a'i wrthwynebu yn glir.
English: Would the Minister agree with me that this decision is a complete breach of faith by the BBC? On its own website on 6 July 2015, referring to a deal the BBC had made with the Government in the run-up to the renewal of the BBC charter in 2017, it said that the BBC would, 'cover the cost of providing free television licences for over-75s', in return for the licence fee rising in line with inflation, which it has done. Therefore, it's the BBC's decision that here is to be criticised. Would he also agree with me that funding an organisation like the BBC by means of a poll tax on owners of television sets is an absurd way of going about things in the twenty-first century? It might have been allright at the time the BBC was founded, when it was the only channel, or indeed up to the 1950s when it was one of only two. But now that there is such a multiplicity of forms of entertainment that are available, it is a ridiculous way for people to fund an organisation that they may not have any interest in watching. I, for one, have no interest in contributing towards Gary Lineker's £1.8 million-a-year pay packet from the BBC for talking balls rather than kicking them.
Welsh: A fyddai'r Gweinidog yn cytuno â mi fod y penderfyniad hwn yn dor-addewid ar ran y BBC? Ar eu gwefan eu hun ar 6 Gorffennaf 2015, wrth gyfeirio at gytundeb a wnaeth y BBC gyda'r Llywodraeth yn y cyfnod cyn adnewyddu siarter y BBC yn 2017, dywedai y byddai'r BBC, yn talu'r gost o ddarparu trwyddedau teledu am ddim i bobl dros 75 oed, yn gyfnewid am godi ffi'r drwydded yn unol â chwyddiant, ac mae wedi gwneud hynny. Felly, penderfyniad y BBC sydd i'w feirniadu yn hyn o beth. A fyddai'n cytuno â mi hefyd fod ariannu sefydliad fel y BBC drwy gyfrwng treth y pen ar berchnogion setiau teledu yn ffordd hurt o fynd ati i wneud pethau yn yr unfed ganrif ar hugain? Efallai ei bod hi'n ffordd iawn o'i wneud ar yr adeg y sefydlwyd y BBC, pan oedd yn unig sianel, neu'n wir hyd at y 1950au pan oedd yn un o ddwy yn unig. Ond gan fod cymaint o fathau o adloniant ar gael erbyn hyn, mae'n ffordd hurt i bobl ariannu sefydliad nad oes ganddynt unrhyw ddiddordeb yn ei gwylio. Yn bersonol, nid oes gennyf unrhyw ddiddordeb mewn cyfrannu tuag at becyn cyflog Gary Lineker o £1.8 miliwn y flwyddyn gan y BBC am siarad am beli yn hytrach na'u cicio.
English: I'm not sure if I'm to take those questions as a serious contribution on this issue, because I thought I'd made it entirely clear at the very outset that this was a discussion between the BBC at a corporate level, the board of the BBC centrally, and the UK Government, and therefore that we, and certainly I, as Minister with an overview of broadcasting, didn't have any opportunity to express a view on this issue. That's why we have made entirely apparent, in the comments that we have made on the consultation, our opposition to what has been put forward. Therefore, I have to emphasise that, as far as I am concerned, what we are calling for is that we encourage the UK Government and the BBC to seek to introduce a seamless mechanism as soon as possible, rather than an option of a means test being implemented, as is happening at the moment.
Welsh: Dwi ddim yn siŵr a ydw i i fod i gymryd y cwestiynau yna fel cyfraniad difrifol i'r mater hwn, oherwydd roeddwn i'n meddwl fy mod i wedi'i gwneud yn hollol glir ar y dechrau mai trafodaeth oedd hon rhwng y BBC yn gorfforaethol, bwrdd y BBC yn ganolog, a Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig, ac felly nad oedd gennym ni, ac yn sicr nad oedd gen i fel Gweinidog â throsolwg dros ddarlledu, unrhyw gyfle i fynegi barn ynglŷn â hyn. Dyna pam rydym ni wedi'i gwneud hi'n gwbl amlwg, yn y sylwadau rydym ni wedi eu gwneud ar yr ymgynghoriad a fu, ein gwrthwynebiad i'r hyn sydd wedi ei osod gerbron. Ac yna, mae'n rhaid i mi bwysleisio, cyn belled ag yr ydw i yn y cwestiwn, mai'r hyn rydym ni'n galw amdano fo ydy ein bod ni'n annog Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig a'r BBC i wneud ymdrech i gyflwyno mecanwaith di-dor cyn gynted ag y bo modd, yn hytrach na bod yna opsiwn ar gyfer prawf moddion yn cael ei roi ar waith, fel sy'n digwydd ar hyn o bryd.
English: Thank you very much, Deputy Minister. The next topical question this afternoon is a question by Andrew R.T. Davies, to be answered by the Minister for Economy and Transport. Andrew R.T. Davies.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Ddirprwy Weinidog. Y cwestiwn amserol nesaf y prynhawn yw cwestiwn gan Andrew R.T. Davies, i'w ateb gan Weinidog yr Economi a Thrafnidiaeth. Andrew R.T. Davies.
English: Yes, of course. Our intention would be to use APD to secure optimal growth for both the airport and for Wales, working with the other levers available to us. Ultimately, this means giving serious consideration to reducing APD rates. Any proposed changes to APD would be impact assessed and, of course, subject to full consultation with businesses and, importantly, the public.
Welsh: Gwnaf, wrth gwrs. Ein bwriad fyddai defnyddio'r doll teithwyr awyr i sicrhau'r twf gorau posibl i'r maes awyr ac i Gymru, gan weithio gyda'r dulliau eraill sydd ar gael i ni. Yn y pen draw, mae hyn yn golygu rhoi ystyriaeth ddifrifol i leihau cyfraddau'r doll teithwyr awyr. Byddai unrhyw newidiadau arfaethedig i'r doll teithwyr awyr yn cael eu hasesu o ran eu heffaith ac wrth gwrs yn amodol ar ymgynghoriad llawn â busnesau, ac yn bwysig, â'r cyhoedd.
English: Thank you for that answer, Minister. I am a little concerned by your pronouncements over the last couple of days where you said that APD, if transferred, could go up, in light of the former First Minister's comments, in particular on long haul, where he said, 'yes we start from the position of looking to get rid of it, certainly not to increase it.' You, yourself, are on record as saying that if APD was transferred and lowered, potentially an extra 0.5 million passengers could use Cardiff Airport. I'm unaware of a consumer tax that, if it's raised, actually incentivises people to use it. So, can you clarify your comments, and in particular some of the remarks of the finance Secretary, that, given some of the pronouncements that have been made by the Welsh Government over the last couple of weeks, actually instead of decreasing APD if it was to be transferred, you as a Government might well be looking to increase it to meet your environmental goals?
Welsh: Diolch ichi am yr ateb hwnnw, Weinidog. Rwy'n poeni ychydig am eich cyhoeddiadau dros yr ychydig ddyddiau diwethaf pan ddywedoch y gallai'r doll teithwyr awyr godi, os caiff ei throsglwyddo, yng ngoleuni sylwadau'r cyn-Brif Weinidog, yn enwedig ar deithiau hir, a dywedodd, rydym yn dechrau o'r safbwynt o geisio cael gwared â hi, yn sicr i beidio â'i chodi. Rydych chi'ch hun wedi dweud ar goedd pe câi'r doll teithwyr awyr ei throsglwyddo a'i gostwng, y gallai 0.5 miliwn o deithwyr ychwanegol ddefnyddio Maes Awyr Caerdydd. Nid wyf yn ymwybodol o dreth defnyddwyr sydd, o'i chodi, yn cymell pobl i'w defnyddio mewn gwirionedd. Felly, a allwch egluro eich sylwadau, a rhai o sylwadau'r Ysgrifennydd cyllid yn enwedig, o ystyried rhai o'r datganiadau a wnaed gan Lywodraeth Cymru dros yr ychydig wythnosau diwethaf, yn hytrach na gostwng y doll teithwyr awyr pe bai'n cael ei throsglwyddo, ei bod yn ddigon posibl y byddwch chi fel Llywodraeth yn ystyried ei chodi er mwyn cyrraedd eich nodau amgylcheddol?
English: No, I don't believe that I have suggested that it could be increased. I think I said that any consideration of varying APD would have to be set against the environmental impact, and we'd have to vary APD in line also with our obligations and requirements under the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015. We've always been clear in saying that we would use APD to make Cardiff Airport and Wales more competitive. Now, I believe - based on emerging technology and the way that the aerospace industry is going and the new fuel systems that are being adopted by aircraft carriers - that we would be able to increase passenger numbers utilising APD and potentially reducing it or abolishing it in a way that would have a net carbon benefit for the environment. I think that that would have to be tested, of course, against a thorough environmental impact assessment, but in no way have I said that I would be raising - or that the Government would be raising - APD. Quite the opposite. Our position is still that our preference would be for the removal or reduction of APD.
Welsh: Na, nid wyf yn credu fy mod wedi awgrymu y gellid ei chodi. Credaf i mi ddweud y byddai'n rhaid gosod unrhyw ystyriaeth ynglŷn ag amrywio'r doll teithwyr awyr yn erbyn yr effaith ar yr amgylchedd, a byddai'n rhaid i ni amrywio'r doll teithwyr awyr yn unol â'n rhwymedigaethau a'n gofynion o dan Ddeddf Llesiant Cenedlaethau'r Dyfodol (Cymru) 2015. Rydym bob amser wedi dweud yn glir y byddem yn defnyddio'r doll teithwyr awyr i wneud Maes Awyr Caerdydd a Chymru yn fwy cystadleuol. Nawr, yn seiliedig ar dechnoleg sy'n datblygu a'r ffordd y mae'r diwydiant awyrofod yn mynd a'r systemau tanwydd newydd sy'n cael eu mabwysiadu gan gwmnïau awyrennau, rwy'n credu y gallem gynyddu nifer y teithwyr sy'n defnyddio'r doll teithwyr awyr a'i gostwng neu ei diddymu o bosibl mewn ffordd a fyddai'n sicrhau budd carbon net i'r amgylchedd. Credaf y byddai'n rhaid profi hynny wrth gwrs yn erbyn asesiad trylwyr o'r effaith amgylcheddol, ond nid wyf wedi dweud mewn unrhyw ffordd y buaswn - neu y byddai'r Llywodraeth - yn codi'r doll teithwyr awyr. I'r gwrthwyneb. Ein safbwynt o hyd yw y byddai'n well gennym ddileu neu ostwng y doll teithwyr awyr.
English: It can be a bit frustrating sitting on these benches. I very much welcome the report from the Welsh Affairs Select Committee. We're pleased that the argument and that opinions from politicians and other political parties are catching up with us, whether it's on the devolution of policing, or the pop tax, or now air passenger duty. It can be frustrating waiting for others to come on board with our ideas, but we are there. I was looking back at a vote in 2014, when Jonathan Edwards was talking in a debate on the Finance Bill. All Conservative Members of Parliament voted against the devolution of air passenger duty. None of the Labour Members turned up for that one. But, we are where we are today. My question, quite simply, to the Minister is how will he now use this report as an additional lever in order to try to get the UK Government to change its mind.
Welsh: Gall eistedd ar y meinciau hyn fod yn rhwystredig braidd. Rwy'n croesawu'n fawr yr adroddiad gan y Pwyllgor Dethol ar Faterion Cymreig. Rydym yn falch fod y ddadl a bod barn gwleidyddion a phleidiau gwleidyddol eraill yn dal i fyny â ni, boed hynny ar ddatganoli plismona, neu'r dreth bop, neu ar y doll teithwyr awyr yn awr. Gall fod yn rhwystredig aros i eraill gefnogi ein syniadau, ond rydym yno. Roeddwn yn edrych yn ôl ar bleidlais yn 2014, pan oedd Jonathan Edwards yn siarad mewn dadl ar y Bil Cyllid. Pleidleisiodd pob Aelod Seneddol Ceidwadol yn erbyn datganoli'r doll teithwyr awyr. Nid oedd yr un o'r Aelodau Llafur yno ar gyfer honno. Ond dyma'r sefyllfa rydym ynddi heddiw. Fy nghwestiwn i i'r Gweinidog yn syml iawn yw sut y bydd yn defnyddio'r adroddiad hwn yn awr fel ysgogiad ychwanegol i geisio cael Llywodraeth y DU i newid ei meddwl.
English: Well, I think, first of all, the Northpoint Aviation report, which was peer-reviewed, Dirprwy Llywydd, presented evidence that showed there'd be reduced carbon impacts as a result of shorter road journeys to Cardiff Airport if APD was devolved and the rates were subsequently reduced. And that's why we've always held the position that our preference would be to reduce or abolish APD. That position has not changed. But it is only right and proper and responsible to ensure that a decision on whether to vary downward, in this case, APD, is acceptable for businesses and the people through a consultation, and is in line not just with - and I think the Member may be conflating two pieces of legislation - not just with the well-being of future generations Act, but also, crucially, with the environment Act as well. But, as I've said, it's my view, based on the evidence that's been presented, that reducing or abolishing APD, and therefore attracting more passengers to Cardiff Airport away from more distant airports, would lead to carbon reduction on the whole.
Welsh: Wel, yn gyntaf oll, Ddirprwy Lywydd, credaf fod adroddiad Northpoint Aviation, adroddiad a adolygwyd gan gymheiriaid, wedi cyflwyno tystiolaeth a ddangosai y byddai llai o effeithiau carbon o ganlyniad i deithiau ffordd byrrach i Faes Awyr Caerdydd pe bai toll teithwyr awyr yn cael ei datganoli a bod y cyfraddau'n lleihau yn sgil hynny. A dyna pam ein bod bob amser wedi bod o'r farn y byddai'n well gennym leihau neu ddiddymu'r doll teithwyr awyr. Nid yw'r safbwynt hwnnw wedi newid. Ond mae'n iawn ac yn briodol ac yn gyfrifol i sicrhau bod penderfyniad a ddylid amrywio'r doll teithwyr awyr, yn yr achos hwn, yn dderbyniol i fusnesau a'r bobl drwy ymgynghoriad, a'i fod yn unol nid yn unig â - a chredaf y gallai'r Aelod fod yn cyfuno dwy ddeddfwriaeth - nid yn unig â Deddf llesiant cenedlaethau'r dyfodol, ond hefyd, yn hollbwysig, â Deddf yr amgylchedd yn ogystal. Ond fel y dywedais, yn seiliedig ar y dystiolaeth a gyflwynwyd, yn fy marn i byddai lleihau neu ddiddymu'r doll teithwyr awyr, a denu mwy o deithwyr i Faes Awyr Caerdydd felly o feysydd awyr pellach, yn arwain at leihau allyriadau carbon ar y cyfan.
English: Thank you. The third topical question this afternoon, again to be answered by the Minister for Economy and Transport. Jayne Bryant.
Welsh: Diolch. Y trydydd cwestiwn amserol y prynhawn yma, i'w ateb unwaith eto gan Weinidog yr Economi a Thrafnidiaeth. Jayne Bryant.
English: This is clearly deeply disappointing news for its workforce. Our thoughts are with those dedicated and loyal employees and their families at this incredibly difficult time. Once appointed, we will seek to work with the administrator to do all that we can do to minimise the impact on the local community and the wider economy.
Welsh: Mae hyn yn amlwg yn newyddion siomedig iawn i'w weithlu. Rydym yn cydymdeimlo â'r gweithwyr ymroddedig a ffyddlon hynny a'u teuluoedd ar yr adeg hynod anodd hon. Ar ôl eu penodi, byddwn yn ceisio gweithio gyda'r gweinyddwyr i wneud popeth y gallwn i leihau'r effaith ar y gymuned leol a'r economi ehangach.
English: Can I thank Jayne Bryant for her topical question, and also thank her for her speedy response to this issue when it emerged? Immediate contact was established, and I know that Jayne Bryant has been incredibly supportive of those people who have been affected by this decision. And I would echo her comments about the way individuals at the company were informed: it was quite appalling that they turned up at the gate to be met by men in grey suits - as it's been described - to be told that their jobs were gone. That is no way to treat a workforce, a dedicated workforce. We will, I can assure the Member, give all the support possible to affected workers. I'm pleased to say that the taskforce that's been established will meet tomorrow. It will have representatives of a number of organisations able to offer advice and assistance to those affected. It will include, of course, officials from Welsh Government, it will include individual professionals from Jobcentre Plus, from Careers Wales, from Newport council, and also from the Citizens Advice bureaux. This is going to be a difficult period for those affected by the announcement, but we will support those people and their families and their community all we can.
Welsh: A gaf fi ddiolch i Jayne Bryant am ei chwestiwn amserol, a diolch iddi hefyd am ei hymateb cyflym i'r mater hwn pan ddaeth i'r amlwg? Sefydlwyd cyswllt ar unwaith, a gwn fod Jayne Bryant wedi bod yn eithriadol o gefnogol i'r bobl yr effeithiwyd arnynt gan y penderfyniad hwn. A hoffwn ategu ei sylwadau am y ffordd y cafodd unigolion yn y cwmni eu hysbysu: roedd yn eithaf gwarthus eu bod wedi cyrraedd y giât lle cawsant glywed gan ddynion mewn siwtiau llwyd - fel y'u disgrifiwyd - eu bod wedi colli eu gwaith. Nid dyna'r ffordd i drin gweithlu, gweithlu ymroddedig. Gallaf sicrhau'r Aelod y byddwn yn rhoi'r holl gymorth posibl i'r gweithwyr yr effeithir arnynt. Rwy'n falch o ddweud y bydd y tasglu a sefydlwyd yn cyfarfod yfory. Bydd yn cynnwys cynrychiolwyr o nifer o sefydliadau sy'n gallu cynnig cyngor a chymorth i'r rhai yr effeithir arnynt. Bydd yn cynnwys swyddogion Llywodraeth Cymru wrth gwrs, bydd yn cynnwys gweithwyr proffesiynol unigol o'r Ganolfan Byd Gwaith, o Gyrfa Cymru, o gyngor Casnewydd, a hefyd o'r canolfannau Cyngor ar Bopeth. Bydd hwn yn gyfnod anodd i'r rhai yr effeithir arnynt gan y cyhoeddiad, ond byddwn yn rhoi cymaint ag y gallwn o gefnogaeth i'r bobl a'u teuluoedd a'u cymuned.
English: Minister, the announcement of 280 job losses at Quinn Radiators has come as a severe blow to this highly skilled, hard-working, and loyal workforce in Newport. It is also concerning to hear that the company received £3 million in loan support from the Welsh Government as recently as 2016. Can we have your assurance, Minister, that you will give every assistance in finding a buyer for this company, or to provide training opportunities for the workforce to find other employment? And what action do you intend to take to secure the return of the money lent in this case to this company? Thank you.
Welsh: Weinidog, mae'r cyhoeddiad am golli 280 o swyddi yn Quinn Radiators wedi bod yn ergyd drom i'r gweithlu hynod fedrus, gweithgar a ffyddlon hwn yng Nghasnewydd. Mae hefyd yn destun pryder i glywed bod y cwmni wedi cael £3 miliwn o gymorth benthyciad gan Lywodraeth Cymru mor ddiweddar â 2016. A allwn gael sicrwydd gennych, Weinidog, y byddwch yn rhoi pob cymorth i ddod o hyd i brynwr i'r cwmni hwn, neu'n darparu cyfleoedd hyfforddi i'r gweithlu ddod o hyd i waith arall? A pha gamau y bwriadwch eu cymryd i sicrhau bod yr arian a fenthycwyd i'r cwmni yn yr achos hwn yn cael ei ddychwelyd? Diolch.
English: Can I thank Mohammad Asghar for his questions, and begin by saying we make no apology for supporting a dynamic business, an innovative business? And, when my predecessor announced the support of Welsh Government for this company, she rightly identified that this was one of the most advanced companies in that particular business sector, as Jayne Bryant has today repeated. And the fact is that cheaper imports, of a lower quality, not so advanced - in the way that Jayne Bryant has outlined - have led to the company's demise. That is deeply regrettable, because the products were of the highest quality. Yes, the business was secured for Wales through a loan, and we have already recovered approximately £0.5 million of that loan. Of course, every effort will be made to recoup it, and officials will be working closely with the administrator. And we've already met as well with the Development Bank of Wales to discuss how to minimise the potential shortfall. But it's as a result of our investment in businesses in Wales that we have a record number of business births, a record number of businesses in existence, and record low unemployment and economic inactivity. This is desperately, desperately bad news for those workers affected. But it's as a result of the Welsh Government's dynamic means of working that I can say, with confidence, that we will be able to find those people alternative work in the area.
Welsh: A gaf fi ddiolch i Mohammad Asghar am ei gwestiynau, a dechrau drwy ddweud nad ydym yn ymddiheuro am gefnogi busnes deinamig, busnes arloesol? A phan gyhoeddodd fy rhagflaenydd gefnogaeth Llywodraeth Cymru i'r cwmni hwn, nododd yn gywir mai hwn oedd un o'r cwmnïau mwyaf blaengar yn y sector busnes penodol hwnnw, fel y mae Jayne Bryant wedi ailadrodd heddiw. A'r ffaith amdani yw bod mewnforion rhatach, o safon is, a heb fod mor ddatblygedig - yn y ffordd y mae Jayne Bryant wedi amlinellu - wedi arwain at dranc y cwmni. Mae hynny'n anffodus iawn, oherwydd roedd y cynhyrchion o'r safon uchaf. Do, cafodd y busnes ei sicrhau i Gymru drwy fenthyciad, ac rydym eisoes wedi adennill tua £0.5 miliwn o'r benthyciad hwnnw. Wrth gwrs, fe wneir pob ymdrech i'w adfer, a bydd swyddogion yn gweithio'n agos gyda'r gweinyddwyr. Ac rydym eisoes wedi cyfarfod â Banc Datblygu Cymru i drafod sut i leihau'r diffyg posibl. Ond o ganlyniad i'n buddsoddiad mewn busnesau yng Nghymru, mae gennym y nifer uchaf erioed o fusnesau newydd, y nifer uchaf erioed o fusnesau mewn bodolaeth, a'r lefel isaf erioed o ddiweithdra ac anweithgarwch economaidd. Mae hwn yn newyddion enbyd o ddrwg i'r gweithwyr yr effeithir arnynt. Ond o ganlyniad i ddulliau deinamig Llywodraeth Cymru o weithio, gallaf ddweud yn hyderus y byddwn yn gallu dod o hyd i waith arall yn yr ardal i'r bobl hynny.