English: Thank you for the series of comments and a few questions in there. I congratulate you on a straight-faced attempt to spend as much time diverting attention away from preparations for a 'no deal' Brexit. I'm not going to get sent down the rabbit hole of talking about things that have nothing to do with the statement I have made on the preparations on a 'no deal' Brexit. I do, though, want to go back to some of the points that you made about Brexit. You said that Brexit must get done, one way or another. You talked about an overwhelming result here in Wales; it was not an overwhelming result. And you talked about 'no deal' has to get done, but protecting - 'no deal' being a potential way forward for this, and yet, at the same time, about protecting our NHS and social care. And, actually, the worst possible outcome for health and social care, for our staff and the public who rely upon it, is a 'no deal'. This isn't complicated. It isn't difficult. The Government's own reports on Yellowhammer acknowledge this; Conservative colleagues around the country acknowledge the harm that a 'no deal' Brexit would do to health and social care. And, just to be absolutely clear, we are not in this position because of the way that Labour Members of Parliament have voted in response to deals put here by the UK Government. And if the Members - [ Interruption.] If the Members want to look at where they were before the general election - having a Conservative majority, the deal done with the DUP, the fact that you lost members of the European research group, who acted as a party within a party - they may well have taken over the rest of the Tory party now, but, actually, there are plenty of Conservatives who would not bring themselves to support the deal provided. This has nothing to do with the way that Labour Members of Parliament have voted and everything to do with the Government's inability to meet the promises that it has made.
Welsh: Diolch am y gyfres o sylwadau ac ychydig o gwestiynau yn y fan yna. Rwy'n eich llongyfarch ar ymgais wynebsyth i dreulio cymaint o amser yn tynnu sylw oddi wrth y paratoadau ar gyfer Brexit heb gytundeb. Nid wyf yn mynd i gael fy anfon ar drywydd pethau nad oes a wnelon nhw ddim â'r datganiad a wnes i ar y paratoadau ar gyfer Brexit heb gytundeb. Er hynny, rwyf eisiau dychwelyd at rai o'r pwyntiau a wnaethoch chi am Brexit. Fe ddywedoch chi bod yn rhaid i Brexit gael ei gyflawni, un ffordd neu'r llall. Fe sonioch chi am ganlyniad ysgubol yma yng Nghymru; nid oedd yn ganlyniad ysgubol. Ac roeddech chi'n sôn bod yn rhaid i Brexit heb gytundeb gael ei gyflawni, ond mae amddiffyn - gadael heb gytundeb yn ffordd bosib ymlaen ar gyfer hyn, ac yna sôn, ar yr un pryd, am ddiogelu ein GIG a gofal cymdeithasol. Ac, mewn gwirionedd, y canlyniad gwaethaf posib i iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol, i'n staff a'r cyhoedd sy'n dibynnu arno, yw gadael heb gytundeb. Nid yw hyn yn gymhleth. Nid yw'n anodd. Mae adroddiadau'r Llywodraeth ei hun ar Yellowhammer yn cydnabod hyn; mae cydweithwyr Ceidwadol ledled y wlad yn cydnabod y niwed y byddai Brexit heb gytundeb yn ei wneud i iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol. Ac, i fod yn gwbl glir, nid ydym ni yn y sefyllfa hon oherwydd y ffordd y mae Aelodau Seneddol Llafur wedi pleidleisio mewn ymateb i gytundebau a gyflwynwyd gan Lywodraeth y DU. Ac os yw'r Aelodau - [ Torri ar draws.] Os yw'r Aelodau eisiau edrych ar ble roedden nhw cyn yr etholiad cyffredinol - yn mwynhau mwyafrif Ceidwadol, y fargen a wnaethpwyd gyda'r DUP, y ffaith eich bod wedi colli aelodau o'r grŵp ymchwil Ewropeaidd, a oedd yn gweithredu fel plaid o fewn plaid - mae'n ddigon posib eu bod wedi meddiannu gweddill y blaid Dorïaidd nawr, ond, mewn gwirionedd, mae digon o Geidwadwyr na fydden nhw'n cefnogi'r cytundeb a ddarperir. Nid oes a wnelo hyn ddim â'r ffordd y mae Aelodau Seneddol Llafur wedi pleidleisio, mae a wnelo â phopeth sy'n ymwneud ag anallu'r Llywodraeth i gyflawni'r addewidion y mae wedi'u gwneud.