English: Before I ask my question, can I remind the Chamber that my wife's a radiographer and is therefore probably on that list of those whose data was breached? Cabinet Secretary, thank you for the answers you've given, and I look forward to the written statements you'll be providing. But, clearly, as well as the data breach issues, there are questions as to what type of information was held and what type of information should be held, because I don't think that the information I'm hearing about is appropriate for such a database, in that sense. What is the Welsh Government doing to ensure that, in future, the data that are going to be held on personnel are only relevant to the particular topic that they are being held for, and not actually on a wider basis. For example, I'm hearing about perhaps even addresses. Well, people's addresses are not relevant to this information. So, it is important that we clarify what data is going on, and will he undertake a survey and a review of that type of data to ensure that, in future, only relevant data are held on individuals for particular purposes? And can he also ensure that people are informed? You've indicated this week that they will be. My wife, when I spoke to her yesterday - she was off yesterday - hadn't been informed of the breach, and therefore I'm assuming her colleagues hadn't been informed of the breach in ABMU. In that sense, it is important that people are told what information is being held about them, what could have be lost on their behalf, so that they can review that information. Because, I'm hearing that Landauer are actually offering two years free access to Experian. Well, this could be longer than that to start with, and why should somebody have to keep looking at this website day after day to see if they're in risk of actually having their identity stolen?
Welsh: Cyn i mi ofyn fy nghwestiwn, a gaf i atgoffa'r Siambr bod fy ngwraig yn radiograffydd ac felly yn ôl pob tebyg mae hi ar y rhestr o'r rhai y mae eu data wedi ei danseilio? Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, diolch i chi am yr atebion yr ydych wedi eu rhoi, ac edrychaf ymlaen at y datganiadau ysgrifenedig y byddwch yn eu darparu. Ond, yn amlwg, yn ogystal â'r materion tanseilio diogelwch data, mae cwestiynau ynghylch pa fath o wybodaeth a oedd yn cael ei chadw a pha fath o wybodaeth y dylid ei chadw, oherwydd nid wyf yn credu bod yr wybodaeth yr wyf yn clywed amdani yn briodol ar gyfer cronfa ddata o'r fath, yn yr ystyr hwnnw. Beth mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn ei wneud i sicrhau, yn y dyfodol, bod y data sydd am gael ei gadw am bersonél ddim ond yn berthnasol i'r testun penodol y mae'n cael ei gadw ar ei gyfer, a ddim mewn gwirionedd ar sail ehangach. Er enghraifft, rwy'n clywed am gyfeiriadau cartref hyd yn oed. Wel, nid yw cyfeiriadau cartref pobl yn berthnasol i'r wybodaeth hon. Felly, mae'n bwysig ein bod yn egluro pa ddata sy'n cael eu cynnwys, ac a fydd ef yn cynnal arolwg ac adolygiad o'r math hwnnw o ddata i sicrhau, yn y dyfodol, mai dim ond data perthnasol sy'n cael ei gadw am unigolion at ddibenion penodol? Ac a all ef hefyd sicrhau bod pobl yn cael gwybod? Rydych chi wedi dweud yr wythnos hon y byddant. Nid oedd fy ngwraig, pan siaradais â hi ddoe - nid oedd hi'n gweithio ddoe - wedi cael gwybod am yr achos o danseilio, ac felly rwy'n tybio nad oedd ei chydweithwyr wedi cael gwybod am yr achos o danseilio yn PABM. Yn hynny o beth, mae'n bwysig bod pobl yn cael gwybod pa wybodaeth sy'n cael ei chadw amdanynt, beth allai fod wedi cael ei golli ar eu rhan, fel y gallant adolygu'r wybodaeth honno. Oherwydd, rwy'n clywed bod Landauer yn cynnig mynediad yn rhad ac am ddim i Experian am ddwy flynedd. Wel, gallai hyn fod yn hwy na hynny i ddechrau, a pham y dylai rhywun orfod edrych ar y wefan hon ddydd ar ôl dydd i weld a oes perygl i rywun ddwyn eu hunaniaeth mewn gwirionedd?