English: Well, can I thank the Member for that important supplementary question? This is a really vital matter and I'm pleased the UK Government has committed to launching a review of how children are dealt with in the family courts. I think that's intended to be a review that lasts for three or four months and the call for evidence is, I think, imminent in relation to that. I have had a preliminary conversation with the Deputy Minister about how best we can engage with that review and will follow that up with a more substantive discussion in the coming days. She will know, of course, that section 1 of Children Act 1989 includes a requirement that the child's welfare is the court's paramount concern and that decisions made by the court should have regard to human rights legislation. One of the critical aspects I believe the review may wish to address is the question of family procedure rules in court and how they work and how they can be strengthened to better protect children from the sorts of decisions that her constituent appears to have had first-hand experience of, unfortunately. A representative appointed by the director of CAFCASS Cymru sits on the Family Procedure Rule Committee, which is responsible for developing and devising those rules of practice and procedure, but, as I say, I will be taking forward those discussions with the Deputy Minister to make sure that we can best feed into that review and reflect the concerns that we have in this Chamber, which are well-established, given our focus here in Government and in the Assembly on upholding the rights of children in all respects.
Welsh: Wel, a gaf i ddiolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn atodol pwysig hwnnw? Mae hwn yn fater pwysig iawn ac rwy'n falch bod Llywodraeth y DU wedi ymrwymo i lansio adolygiad o'r ffordd yr ymdrinnir â phlant yn y llysoedd teulu. Credaf fod bwriad i'r adolygiad barhau am dri neu bedwar mis ac mae'r alwad am dystiolaeth, rwy'n credu, yn yr arfaeth yn gysylltiedig â hynny. Rwyf wedi cael sgwrs ragarweiniol gyda'r Dirprwy Weinidog ynglŷn â'r ffordd orau y gallwn ymgysylltu â'r adolygiad hwnnw, a byddwn yn dilyn hynny gyda thrafodaeth fwy sylweddol yn y dyddiau nesaf. Bydd hi'n gwybod, wrth gwrs, fod Adran 1 Deddf Plant 1989 yn cynnwys gofyniad mai lles y plentyn yw prif gonsyrn y llys ac y dylai penderfyniadau a wneir gan y llys ystyried deddfwriaeth hawliau dynol. Un o'r agweddau hollbwysig y credaf y gallai'r adolygiad fynd i'r afael â hi yw mater rheolau trefniadaeth teulu yn y llys a sut y maen nhw'n yn gweithio a sut y gellir eu hatgyfnerthu er mwyn amddiffyn plant yn well rhag y mathau o benderfyniadau yr ymddengys i'w hetholwr gael profiad uniongyrchol ohono, yn anffodus. Mae cynrychiolydd a benodwyd gan gyfarwyddwr CAFCASS Cymru yn eistedd ar y Pwyllgor Rheolau Trefniadaeth Teulu sy'n gyfrifol am ddatblygu a dyfeisio'r rheolau arferion a gweithdrefnau hynny, ond, fel y dywedais, byddaf yn bwrw ymlaen â'r trafodaethau hynny gyda'r Dirprwy Weinidog i sicrhau'r ffordd orau y gallwn gyfrannu at yr adolygiad hwnnw ac adlewyrchu'r pryderon sydd gennym yn y Siambr hon. Maen nhw'n bryderon sydd wedi'u hen sefydlu, o gofio ein pwyslais yma yn y Llywodraeth ac yn y Cynulliad ar gynnal hawliau plant ym mhob ffordd.