English: Diolch, Llywydd. If I were told to make up a story, I don't think I could make up something as unbelievable as this. The UK and Chinese Governments strike a deal with tens of billions of pounds, and as part of the deal they plan to dump 320,000 tonnes of mud from outside a nuclear power station off the coast of Wales without testing it properly. Many of us campaigned for years for this institution, because at times like this, we expected a Welsh Government to stand up for us. But what has Labour done? Want to dump your waste on us? No problem, fine. They've welcomed it. Let's for the moment forget about the potential health concerns and the lack of an environmental impact assessment. Why would you accept 320,000 tonnes of waste being dumped on your doorstep by your neighbour? Why would you do that? On 20 June this year, Emeritus Professor Keith Barnham, Imperial College London, wrote to the Government to warn about the possible dangers with the mud from outside of Hinkley Point. Magnox Ltd have admitted there were cooling pond accidents in the 1960s with weapon-grade plutonium. This was new information and should have forced a rethink on the licence. In terms of safety, the Government has accepted the bare minimum. Every physicist I've spoken to says that in order to identify every kind of plutonium that you may find in such mud, there needs to be done three kinds of testing: alpha spectrometry, mass spectrometry and gamma spectrometry. This is just scientific fact - speak to the physicists - and it's being reckless to ignore this. Irresponsible. With respect, Cabinet Secretary, you don't know what you are doing. We've had excuse after excuse that nothing can be done, that it's all the fault of Natural Resources Wales. In Wales, we have the only Government in the world that is unable to control the very agencies it has set up, and once again, through legal action by the campaigners, we've found out that it's not Natural Resources Wales who was ultimately responsible, but the Cabinet Secretary. The monumental incompetence and arrogance is staggering, and I say to every single Labour Member here today: people voted for you and they put their trust in you. Listen to them. Listen to your voters, and not the whip. It was also established through legal action that there was no environmental impact assessment carried out for the dumping on the Cardiff Grounds and its aftermath. There was a 2,000-page document about the effect on the Bristol side, but virtually nothing about Wales. And let's flag up also that the Minister at the time, who decided not to have an environmental impact assessment, was a former lobbyist for the nuclear industry. Extraordinary - only in Wales. Only in Wales. So, how can you allow the dumping of 320,000 tonnes of mud from outside a nuclear power station and not examine the effects on the local environment? The eyes of the world are on Cardiff today - this is an international campaign - and my amendment asks you to support an environmental impact assessment. Why would you vote against that? Forget the technicalities; let's get the assessment done. I'm going to quote Professor Keith Barnham, Imperial College London, now, a former particle physicist - we used to call them nuclear physicists. And he says the tests done on the Hinkley mud were done with gamma radiation detectors. Plutonium nuclei do not decay by emitting gamma rays, but rather by emitting alpha particles, for which the mud has not been tested. You have a choice now - we all have a choice. This is the National Assembly for Wales. People vote for us to look after Wales, do things in their best interests and hold the Government to account. So, will you stand up for Wales today? Or will you let the nuclear industry dump all over our country?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Pe bai rhywun yn dweud wrthyf am lunio stori, nid wyf yn meddwl y gallwn lunio rhywbeth mor anhygoel â hyn. Mae Llywodraeth y DU a Llywodraeth Tsieina yn taro bargen gyda degau o biliynau o bunnoedd, ac fel rhan o'r fargen maent yn bwriadu dympio 320,000 o dunelli o fwd o'r tu allan i orsaf bŵer niwclear oddi ar arfordir Cymru heb gynnal profion priodol arno. Ymgyrchodd llawer ohonom am flynyddoedd dros y sefydliad hwn, oherwydd ar adegau fel hyn, roeddem yn disgwyl i Lywodraeth Cymru sefyll drosom. Ond beth a wnaeth Llafur? A hoffech chi ddympio eich gwastraff arnom? Dim problem, iawn. Maent wedi ei groesawu. Gadewch i ni anghofio am funud am y pryderon iechyd posibl a'r diffyg asesiad o'r effaith amgylcheddol. Pam y byddech chi'n caniatáu i 320,000 o dunelli o wastraff gael ei ddadlwytho ar garreg eich drws gan eich cymydog? Pam y byddech chi'n gwneud hynny? Ar 20 Mehefin eleni, ysgrifennodd yr Athro Emeritws Keith Barnham, Coleg Imperial Llundain, at y Llywodraeth i rybuddio ynglŷn â pheryglon posibl gyda'r mwd o'r tu allan i Hinkley Point. Mae Magnox Cyf wedi cyfaddef fod damweiniau pwll oeri wedi digwydd yn ystod y 1960au gyda phlwtoniwm o safon cynhyrchu arfau. Roedd hon yn wybodaeth newydd a dylai fod wedi gorfodi pobl i ailfeddwl ynglŷn â'r drwydded. O ran diogelwch, mae'r Llywodraeth wedi derbyn y lefel isaf sy'n bosibl. Mae'r holl ffisegwyr y siaradais â hwy'n dweud bod angen gwneud tri math o brawf er mwyn nodi pob math o blwtoniwm y gallech ddod o hyd iddo mewn mwd o'r fath: sbectrometreg alffa, sbectrometreg màs a sbectrometreg gama. Ffaith wyddonol yw hon, dyna i gyd - siaradwch â'r ffisegwyr - ac mae anwybyddu hyn yn brawf o ddiofalwch, yn anghyfrifol. Gyda phob parch, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, nid ydych yn gwybod beth rydych yn ei wneud. Rydym wedi cael esgus ar ôl esgus na ellir gwneud dim, mai bai Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru yw'r cyfan. Yng Nghymru, mae gennym yr unig Lywodraeth yn y byd sy'n methu â rheoli'r union asiantaethau y mae eu sefydlu, ac unwaith eto, drwy gamau cyfreithiol gan yr ymgyrchwyr, rydym wedi canfod nad Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru oedd yn gyfrifol yn y pen draw, ond Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet. Mae'r bwnglereiddiwch a'r haerllugrwydd yn syfrdanol, ac rwy'n dweud wrth bob Aelod Llafur yma heddiw: pleidleisiodd pobl drosoch a rhoi eu ffydd ynoch. Gwrandewch arnynt. Gwrandewch ar eich etholwyr, ac nid ar y chwip. Sefydlwyd hefyd drwy gamau cyfreithiol nad oedd unrhyw asesiad o'r effaith amgylcheddol wedi'i gynnal ar gyfer dympio yn Cardiff Grounds a chanlyniadau hynny. Cafwyd dogfen 2,000 tudalen am yr effaith ar ochr Bryste, ond bron ddim am Gymru. A gadewch i ni dynnu sylw hefyd at y ffaith bod y Gweinidog ar y pryd a benderfynodd beidio â chael asesiad o'r effaith amgylcheddol yn gyn lobïwr ar ran y diwydiant niwclear. Syfrdanol - dim ond yng Nghymru. Dim ond yng Nghymru. Felly, sut y gallwch ganiatáu i 320,000 o dunelli o fwd o'r tu allan i orsaf bŵer niwclear gael ei ddympio heb archwilio'r effeithiau ar yr amgylchedd lleol? Mae llygaid y byd ar Gaerdydd heddiw - mae hon yn ymgyrch ryngwladol - ac mae fy ngwelliant yn gofyn i chi gefnogi asesiad o'r effaith amgylcheddol. Pam y byddech yn pleidleisio yn erbyn hynny? Anghofiwch y manylion technegol; gadewch inni gael yr asesiad wedi'i wneud. Rwy'n mynd i ddyfynnu'r Athro Keith Barnham, Coleg Imperial Llundain, cyn ffisegwyr gronynnol - arferem eu galw'n ffisegwyr niwclear. Ac mae'n dweud bod y profion a wnaethpwyd ar fwd Hinkley wedi'u gwneud gan ddefnyddio synwyryddion ymbelydredd gama. Nid yw niwclei plwtoniwm yn dirywio drwy allyrru pelydrau gamma, ond yn hytrach drwy allyrru gronynnau alffa, ac ni chynhaliwyd profion ar y mwd i'r perwyl hwnnw. Mae gennych ddewis bellach - mae gan bawb ohonom ddewis. Cynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru yw hwn. Mae pobl yn pleidleisio drosom er mwyn inni edrych ar ôl Cymru, gwneud pethau er eu lles gorau a dwyn y Llywodraeth i gyfrif. Felly, a wnewch chi sefyll dros Gymru heddiw? Neu a fyddwch chi'n gadael i'r diwydiant niwclear ddympio'i faw dros ein gwlad?