English: Could I, in a sense, support Simon's call for a statement regarding the Trago Mills investment, but also including the confidentiality of correspondence for inward investors? My region benefited from £65 million, I understand, of investment in this site. Its head was condemned by both the Welsh language Minister and the Counsel General for expressing his view regarding bilingual signage. I haven't heard any similar condemnation from anyone in Welsh Government about the leaking of that correspondence in the first place. Do we now have a fit-and-proper-character test for inward investors, and, if so, can we, perhaps, clarify the scope of that? The individual concerned said, at least according to the South Wales Argus, that welcome signs, 'departmental descriptions, directional, welfare and safety signage willdisplay Welsh and English language', but then said they didn't plan 'to cascade its use a great deal further at present.' Can Welsh Government clarify what standards are expected in terms of bilingual signage from private businesses? Could we also say if any other inward investor or, indeed, any of my constituents in south-east Wales, questions Welsh language policy, can they also expect to have their confidential correspondence leaked? What impact does the leader of the house think that will have on the willingness of such people to engage with Welsh Government in future? Could we have guidance on exactly what such correspondence - or how egregious views must be in order to be considered offensive, such that they will be leaked in this way? Finally, will there be any inquiry regarding the Welsh Language Commissioner and this leak?
Welsh: A gaf i, mewn ffordd, gefnogi galwad Simon am ddatganiad ar fuddsoddiad Trago Mills, ond gan gynnwys hefyd gyfrinachedd yr ohebiaeth ar gyfer mewnfuddsoddwyr? Rwyf ar ddeall bod fy rhanbarth i wedi elwa ar fuddsoddiad o £65 miliwn yn y safle hwn. Condemniwyd ei bennaeth gan Weinidog y Gymraeg a'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol am fynegi ei farn ynghylch arwyddion dwyieithog. Dydw i ddim wedi clywed unrhyw gondemniad tebyg gan unrhyw un yn Llywodraeth Cymru ynghylch gollwng yr ohebiaeth honno yn y lle cyntaf. A oes gennym ni nawr brawf cymeriad addas a phriodol ar gyfer mewnfuddsoddwyr, ac, os felly, a allwn ni, efallai, egluro cwmpas hynny? Dywedodd yr unigolyn dan sylw, yn ôl y South Wales Argus o leiaf, y bydd yr arwyddion croesawu, 'disgrifiadau adrannol, arwyddion lles a diogelwch ynarddangos y Gymraeg a'r Saesneg', ond dywedodd wedyn nad oedd yn bwriadu 'datblygu lawer mwy ar ei defnydd ar hyn o bryd.' A wnaiff Llywodraeth Cymru egluro pa safonau a ddisgwylir o ran arwyddion dwyieithog gan fusnesau preifat? A allem ni ddweud hefyd pe byddai unrhyw fewnfuddsoddwr arall neu, yn wir, unrhyw un o fy etholwyr yn ne-ddwyrain Cymru, yn cwestiynu polisi iaith Gymraeg, yna a allen nhw hefyd ddisgwyl cael eu gohebiaeth gyfrinachol wedi'i datgelu? Arweinydd y tŷ, pa effaith a gaiff hyn, yn eich barn chi, ar barodrwydd pobl o'r fath i ymgysylltu â Llywodraeth Cymru yn y dyfodol? A gawn ni ganllawiau ar ba ohebiaeth o'r fath - neu pa mor eithafol y byddai'n rhaid i farn fod er mwyn ei hystyried yn sarhaus, i'r graddau a fydd yn achosi iddi gael ei datgelu yn y modd hwn? Yn olaf, a fydd unrhyw ymchwiliad ynghylch Comisiynydd y Gymraeg a'r gollyngiad hwn?