English: I thank Alun Davies for the question. There have been aspects of progress; I want to reassure him in relation to that. So, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee have recently agreed to make it compulsory, for example, for cases against Welsh public bodies to be heard in Wales, where there was challenge to the lawfulness of their decisions. And I was also very pleased to see that the Solicitors Regulation Authority have committed now to make the solicitors qualifying examination qualification available in Welsh. Both of those are recommendations of the Thomas commission. Whilst important, I'm not suggesting they are the central recommendations, obviously, but just to demonstrate that, where progress has been possible, we have been pursuing that, together with our partners. On the larger point that he makes in relation to what we have perhaps learnt in the last few weeks in particular about the impact of the nature of our devolution settlement in justice on outcomes, which is fundamentally the most important case to make, I think it does demonstrate the shortcomings of the current arrangements. And whereas public bodies in Wales have done their utmost, I think, and their level best, to work together in extraordinarily difficult circumstances, I do think those have been to some extent hampered in this space by the nature of our devolution settlement. And I made that point to the Lord Chancellor in a recent discussion with him; I know he also is focused on outcomes. And some of those practical points around the prison population in particular - that conversation that I had with him, together with the First Minister and the Chief Whip, also explored the establishment of the first residential women's centre in Wales, for example, so, hopefully, again, making practical progress in some of those areas. But I would certainly echo the larger point that he makes about what we've learnt about the devolution settlement in the last few weeks and months.
Welsh: Rwy'n diolch i Alun Davies am y cwestiwn. Mae rhai agweddau ar gynnydd wedi digwydd; rwy'n awyddus i'w sicrhau o hynny. Felly, mae Pwyllgor Rheolau'r Weithdrefn Sifil wedi cytuno yn ddiweddar i'w gwneud yn orfodol, er enghraifft, i achosion yn erbyn cyrff cyhoeddus Cymru gael gwrandawiad yng Nghymru, lle cafwyd her i gyfreithlondeb eu penderfyniadau. Ac roeddwn i'n falch iawn hefyd o weld bod yr Awdurdod Rheoleiddio Cyfreithwyr wedi ymrwymo erbyn hyn i sicrhau bod y cymhwyster arholiad i gymhwyso cyfreithwyr ar gael yn y Gymraeg. Roedd y ddau argymhelliad hyn yng Nghomisiwn Thomas. Er eu bod nhw'n bwysig, nid wyf yn awgrymu mai'r rhain yw'r argymhellion canolog, dim ond i ddangos ein bod wedi mynd ar drywydd hynny gyda'n partneriaid, lle mae cynnydd wedi bod yn bosibl. O ran y pwynt ehangach a wna mewn cysylltiad â'r hyn a ddysgwyd gennym o bosibl yn ystod yr ychydig wythnosau diwethaf, yn benodol am effaith natur ein setliad datganoli ynglŷn â chyfiawnder o ran canlyniadau, sef yr achos pwysicaf un i'w wneud yn y bôn, rwy'n credu ei fod yn dangos diffygion y trefniadau presennol. Ac er bod cyrff cyhoeddus yng Nghymru wedi gwneud eu gorau glas a phopeth o fewn eu gallu, yn fy marn i, i weithio gyda'i gilydd mewn amgylchiadau eithriadol o anodd, rwy'n credu bod y rhain, i ryw raddau, wedi cael eu llesteirio yn y fan hon oherwydd natur ein setliad datganoli. Fe wnes i'r pwynt hwnnw i'r Arglwydd Ganghellor mewn trafodaeth ddiweddar gydag ef; rwy'n gwybod ei fod yntau hefyd yn canolbwyntio ar ganlyniadau. Ac roedd rhai o'r pwyntiau ymarferol hynny am boblogaeth y carchardai yn benodol - y drafodaeth honno a gefais i gydag ef, ynghyd â'r Prif Weinidog a'r Prif Chwip, hefyd yn ystyried sefydlu'r ganolfan breswyl gyntaf i fenywod yng Nghymru, er enghraifft, gan felly wneud cynnydd ymarferol yn rhai o'r meysydd hynny. Ond fe fyddwn i'n sicr yn ategu'r pwynt mwy eang a wna am yr hyn yr ydym wedi ei ddysgu am y setliad datganoli yn ystod yr wythnosau a'r misoedd diwethaf.