English: That is the situation. Now, from April, as we've already heard, the Welsh Government will have new tax levers - more tax levers than ever before in order to generate some wealth for the Welsh economy, but instead of seizing the opportunity that those tax levers represent, to give our economy a shot in the arm, the Welsh Government has succumbed to the traditional Labour temptation of tax and spend. Let's take the new 6 per cent supertax, for example, which you impose on commercial land sales of over £1 million - a move that the Welsh chartered surveyors labelled as, and I quote, 'crazy'. They warned, and I quote, that it would make Wales a less commercially attractive place to invest and would damage the economy. That's the sort of punitive tax-and-spend ideology that you'd expect from a party that has, time and time again, absolutely trashed our public finances. This budget could have helped to address those concerns and helped to attract more businesses to relocate into Wales, but it hasn't, because instead, Cabinet Secretary, you've ignored them. This is not the sort of twenty-first century socialism that you claim to represent; it's the sort of socialism that stifles opportunity, holds Wales back and strangles the life chances of the next generation. And what about these other tax levers at your disposal? The Confederation of British Industry has rightly warned you about raising Welsh income tax, saying that it should be last resort and not a first response. And I'm very pleased to see that, in your budget, there are no proposals at present to increase Welsh income taxes. But, of course, what you didn't guarantee was that they're not going to rise in the future - you've only mentioned the next financial year. You're a member of a party that committed itself in a manifesto before the 2016 Assembly elections that you were not going to increase income tax. Will you give us personally that commitment here again today from you, Cabinet Secretary? We've only got a small proportion of the UK's higher and additional rate taxpayers and I think it's extremely likely that these highly mobile individuals would be relocating from Wales, resulting in a loss of revenue for the Welsh coffers and also resulting in investment from those individuals going elsewhere. And it's true, of course, of other taxes too. I'm very pleased to hear that you've had a belated conversion to the need to do something extra on business rates, because, as we know, at present, we have the least attractive business rate regime in the United Kingdom, as a result of the current situation with the multiplier. I'm looking forward - you've shown us a bit of leg in terms of your plans to use the £26 million consequential that you've received from the UK Government to support the situation with business rates, but you haven't given us more detail about that, and I'd like to hear more detail in your response to the debate today. You see, we Conservatives know that when you support businesses, you're actually helping to stimulate the whole economy and you're helping to support public services because it's private businesses that create the wealth, that pay the taxes, that employ people who also pay their taxes, and it's those taxes that pay for the public services that we enjoy in Wales, and the staff who work in them. So, this budget is a let-down in many respects, not least for Welsh businesses. It's also a let-down, of course, for first-time buyers. It does very little to accelerate house building, the house building that we need and was referred to during First Minister's questions today. It doesn't do a great deal extra in terms of helping people to get their foot on the housing ladder either. And you could have taken further steps to support people through extensions of the allowance in terms of the land transaction tax in order to help people onto the housing ladder. But you haven't. You haven't. It's another missed opportunity. Turning to the NHS, we've welcomed the additional investment that your Government has put into the national health service, but I have to say that it's a little bit too little too late. Let's not forget that Wales has the accolade of having the only Government ever anywhere in the United Kingdom that has ever cut a national health service budget. And the legacy of your savage cuts in a previous administration to the NHS budget live on with us today, because as a result of those cuts - [ Interruption.] You were talking about how budgets change over a period if they keep pace with inflation. Well, let me tell you, if you hadn't cut the national health service budget in the year that you cut that budget, with the support of Plaid Cymru I might add, the national health service budget - if you had kept pace with the spending increases in England - would be £1 billion healthier today in Wales than is currently the case. Because the truth is that, over the past six years, the budget has risen more than twice as fast in terms of the health service in England than it has done in Wales, and it's very clear - [ Interruption.] It's very clear - these are facts. You don't like the facts - [ Interruption.] You don't like the facts - [ Interruption.] You don't like the facts, but that is the truth. It's very clear that it's this Conservative Party that are championing the national health service, not the Labour Party here in Wales. I'll happily take the intervention.
Welsh: Dyna'r sefyllfa. Nawr, o fis Ebrill, fel rydym ni wedi ei glywed eisoes, bydd gan Lywodraeth Cymru ysgogiadau treth newydd - mwy o ysgogiadau treth nag erioed o'r blaen i gynhyrchu rhywfaint o gyfoeth i economi Cymru, ond yn hytrach na bachu ar y cyfle y mae'r ysgogiadau treth hynny'n ei gynrychioli, i roi hwb i'n heconomi, mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ildio i demtasiwn draddodiadol Llafur o drethu a gwario. Gadewch i ni gymryd yr ardreth newydd o 6 y cant, er enghraifft, yr ydych chi'n ei gorfodi ar werthiannau tir masnachol gwerth dros £1 filiwn - cam y dywedodd syrfewyr siartredig Cymru oedd, ac rwy'n dyfynnu, yn 'wallgof'. Rhybuddiwyd gannddynt, ac rwy'n dyfynnu, y byddai'n gwneud Cymru yn lle llai deniadol yn fasnachol i fuddsoddi ynddo ac y byddai'n niweidio'r economi. Dyna'r math o ideoleg trethu a gwario gosbol y byddech chi'n ei disgwyl gan blaid sydd, dro ar ôl tro, wedi gwneud llanastr llwyr o'n cyllid cyhoeddus. Gallai'r gyllideb hon fod wedi helpu i ddatrys y pryderon hynny a helpu i ddenu mwy o fusnesau i adleoli i Gymru, ond nid yw wedi gwneud hynny; oherwydd yn hytrach, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, rydych chi wedi eu hanwybyddu nhw. Nid dyma'r math o sosialaeth unfed ganrif ar hugain yr ydych chi'n honni eich bod yn ei gynrychioli; dyma'r math o sosialaeth sy'n atal cyfleoedd, yn dal Cymru yn ôl ac yn tagu cyfleoedd bywyd y genhedlaeth nesaf. A beth am yr ysgogiadau treth eraill hyn sydd ar gael i chi? Mae Cydffederasiwn Diwydiant Prydain wedi eich rhybuddio, yn gwbl briodol, am godi treth incwm Cymru, gan ddweud y ddylai fod yn ddewis olaf ac nid ymateb cyntaf. Ac rwy'n falch iawn o weld, yn eich cyllideb, nad oes unrhyw gynigion ar hyn o bryd i gynyddu trethi incwm Cymru. Ond, wrth gwrs, yr hyn na wnaethoch chi roi sicrwydd yn ei gylch yw na fyddant yn cynyddu yn y dyfodol - dim ond am y flwyddyn ariannol nesaf yr ydych chi wedi sôn. Rydych chi'n aelod o blaid a ymrwymodd ei hun mewn maniffesto cyn etholiadau Cynulliad 2016 nad oeddech chi'n mynd i gynyddu treth incwm. A wnewch chi roi'r ymrwymiad hwnnw i ni yn bersonol yma eto heddiw, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet? Dim ond cyfran fach o drethdalwyr cyfradd uwch ac ychwanegol y DU sydd gennym ni ac rwy'n meddwl ei bod hi'n hynod debygol y byddai'r unigolion hynod symudol hyn yn adleoli o Gymru, gan arwain at golli refeniw i goffrau Cymru a chan arwain hefyd at fuddsoddiad gan yr unigolion hynny yn mynd i fannau eraill. Ac mae'n wir, wrth gwrs, am drethi eraill hefyd. Rwy'n falch iawn o glywed eich bod chi wedi cael sgwrs, o'r diwedd, am yr angen i wneud rhywbeth ychwanegol am ardrethi busnes, oherwydd, fel y gwyddom, ar hyn o bryd, mae gennym ni'r gyfundrefn ardrethi busnes leiaf deniadol yn y Deyrnas Unedig, o ganlyniad i'r sefyllfa bresennol gyda'r lluosydd. Rwy'n edrych ymlaen - rydych chi wedi dangos tipyn o goes i ni o ran eich cynlluniau i ddefnyddio swm canlyniadol o £26 miliwn yr ydych chi wedi ei gael gan Lywodraeth y DU i gynorthwyo'r sefyllfa gydag ardrethi busnes, ond nid ydych chi wedi rhoi mwy o fanylion i ni am hynny, a hoffwn glywed rhagor o fanylion yn eich ymateb i'r ddadl heddiw. Welwch chi, rydym ni'r Ceidwadwyr yn gwybod pan fyddwch chi'n cynorthwyo busnesau, rydych chi mewn gwirionedd yn helpu i ysgogi'r holl economi ac yn helpu i gynorthwyo gwasanaethau cyhoeddus gan mai busnesau preifat sy'n creu'r cyfoeth, sy'n talu'r trethi, sy'n cyflogi pobl sydd hefyd yn talu eu trethi, a'r trethi hynny sy'n talu am y gwasanaethau cyhoeddus yr ydym ni'n eu mwynhau yng Nghymru, a'r staff sy'n gweithio ynddynt. Felly, mae'r gyllideb hon yn siom mewn sawl ffordd, yn enwedig i fusnesau Cymru. Mae hefyd yn siom, wrth gwrs, i brynwyr tro cyntaf. Prin iawn y mae'n ei wneud i gyflymu'r gwaith o adeiladu tai, y gwaith adeiladu tai sydd ei angen arnom ni ac y cyfeiriwyd ato yn ystod cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog heddiw. Nid yw'n gwneud llawer iawn yn fwy o ran helpu pobl i gael eu troed ar yr ysgol dai chwaith. A gallech chi fod wedi cymryd camau pellach i gynorthwyo pobl drwy estyniadau i'r lwfans o ran y dreth trafodiadau tir er mwyn helpu pobl i ymuno â'r ysgol dai. Ond wnaethoch chi ddim. Wnaethoch chi ddim. Mae'n gyfle arall a gollwyd. I droi at y GIG, rydym ni wedi croesawu'r buddsoddiad ychwanegol y mae eich Llywodraeth wedi ei wneud yn y gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol, ond mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud ei fod yn rhy ychydig yn rhy hwyr braidd. Gadewch i ni beidio ag anghofio bod gan Gymru yr anrhydedd o fod â'r unig Lywodraeth erioed yn unrhyw le yn y Deyrnas Unedig sydd wedi torri cyllideb gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol. Ac mae etifeddiaeth eich toriadau llym mewn gweinyddiaeth flaenorol i gyllideb y GIG yn fyw gyda ni heddiw, oherwydd o ganlyniad i'r toriadau hynny - [ Torri ar draws. ] Roeddech chi'n sôn am sut y mae cyllidebau yn newid dros gyfnod os byddant yn cyd-fynd â chwyddiant. Wel, gadewch i mi ddweud wrthych chi, pe na baech chi wedi torri cyllideb y gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol yn y flwyddyn y gwnaethoch chi dorri'r gyllideb honno, gyda chefnogaeth Plaid Cymru dylwn ychwanegu, byddai cyllideb y gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol - pe baech chi wedi cadw i fyny â'r cynnydd mewn gwariant yn Lloegr - £1 biliwn yn iachach heddiw yng Nghymru nag y mae ar hyn o bryd. Oherwydd y gwir yw, dros y chwe blynedd diwethaf, bod y gyllideb wedi cynyddu fwy na dwywaith mor gyflym o ran y gwasanaeth iechyd yn Lloegr ag y mae wedi ei wneud yng Nghymru, ac mae'n eglur iawn - [ Torri ar draws. ] Mae'n eglur iawn - ffeithiau yw'r rhain. Nid ydych chi'n hoffi'r ffeithiau - [ Torri ar draws. ] Nid ydych chi'n hoffi'r ffeithiau - [ Torri ar draws. ] Nid ydych chi'n hoffi'r ffeithiau, ond dyna'r gwir. Mae'n eglur iawn mai'r Blaid Geidwadol hon sy'n hyrwyddo'r gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol, nid y Blaid Lafur yma yng Nghymru. Byddaf yn hapus i dderbyn yr ymyriad.