English: Thank you Deputy Presiding Officer, and thank you for your statement, Minister. The attitude of the Westminster Government in relation to the appalling situation in Ukraine is entirely paradoxical. On the one hand, the people of Wales and the UK are united in solidarity with the people of Ukraine, and are united in their anger towards Putin and his illegal war and his war crimes. And the Westminster Government claims to share those strong feelings. Indeed, we heard Boris Johnson today addressing the Ukrainian Parliament. But, despite the importance of warm words and supportive speeches, actions are more important, and Boris Johnson's Government is failing the people of Ukraine and is undermining Welsh efforts to be a nation of sanctuary. The most effective act that the Westminster Government could take to assist the people of Ukraine is not to give a speech, but to ensure that there is safe and swift passage for people to come to Wales and to the UK. Many of these people have lost loved ones, are suffering trauma as a result of the barbarism of war. What they need is love, a home and an opportunity, and our support and assistance so that they can access those things. In listening to Boris Johnson and his Government's rhetoric, one would think that this is exactly what we are providing to Ukrainian refugees, but time and time again in politics, we see that there is a gulf between the rhetoric of those in power and their actions. And the response of the Westminster Government to the situation in Ukraine, unfortunately, is a perfect example of this. The Westminster Government, despite warm words, is letting the people of Ukraine down. The Ukrainian ambassador to the UK has called on the Home Secretary to take urgent action to improve the visa process, which, in his words, is unnecessarily long-winded and bureaucratic, leaving thousands of people powerless across mainland Europe. And the Welsh Refugee Council has heard of the frustration of the families who do come here on the families plan rather than the Homes for Ukraine programme, and that the Welsh people offering sanctuary to them aren't qualified for the payment of £350. This is a fundamental injustice, and an example of the Home Office transferring its moral responsibility to the public, with many refugees facing challenges, as we heard, in terms of lack of support and information, language learning, and the fact that registering for schools and GPs is absurdly complex. How is the Welsh Government going to overcome these inconsistencies in light of the tardiness of the UK Government? Two thousand three hundred visas have been allowed in Wales under the Homes for Ukraine programme. And as you mentioned, of these, 670 have been supersponsored by the Welsh Government. Scotland has seen 5,200 visas, with 3,000 of them supersponsored by the Scottish Government. This gap between the two nations is substantial. So, can the Minister explain the reason for this inconsistency between Wales and Scotland? Is the Minister confident that there is no factor beyond chance that is responsible for this? It's likely that refugees arriving here, particularly women and children who are vulnerable, will have already suffered trauma. And so, as you mentioned, and as Mark Isherwood also mentioned, ensuring that they are safe and cared for when they arrive is crucially important. And I do welcome what you've said in terms of how you're trying to address these issues, but a number of refugee organisations and anti-people trading organisations have written to Michael Gove to express their grave concerns about safeguarding, with people traffickers already targeting women and children from Ukraine. This is a heartbreaking situation, which contradicts entirely the rhetoric of the UK Government. There is no reason why we shouldn't or couldn't have a humanitarian programme that welcomes refugees and safeguards them entirely from abuse. It doesn't sound to me as if the Minister was entirely content that the changes in training and professional support in terms of the programme here in Wales is adequate to ensure security and safety for Ukrainian refugees. So, what more can be done? Thank you?
Welsh: Diolch, Ddirprwy Lywydd, a diolch am y datganiad, Weinidog. Mae agwedd Llywodraeth San Steffan tuag at y sefyllfa erchyll yn Wcráin yn gwbl baradocsaidd. Ar yr un llaw, mae pobl Cymru a Phrydain yn unedig yn eu solidariaeth â phobl Wcráin, ac yn unedig yn eu dicter tuag at Putin ynghyd â'i ryfel anghyfreithlon a'i droseddau rhyfel anwaraidd. Ac mae Llywodraeth San Steffan yn honni ei bod yn rhannu'r teimladau cryfion hyn. Yn wir, fel y clywsom ni, bu Boris Johnson heddiw yn annerch Senedd Wcráin. Ond er mor bwysig yw areithiau cefnogol a geiriau cynnes, mae gweithredoedd yn bwysicach, ac mae Llywodraeth Boris Johnson yn methu pobl Wcráin ac yn tanseilio ymdrechion Cymru i fod yn genedl noddfa. Y weithred fwyaf effeithiol y gallai Llywodraeth San Steffan ei gwneud i helpu pobl Wcráin yw nid mynd a datgan araith, ond sicrhau bod modd diogel a chyflym iddyn nhw ddod i Gymru ac i Brydain. Mae nifer o'r bobl hyn wedi colli anwyliaid, yn dioddef o drawma o ganlyniad i farbariaeth rhyfel. Yr hyn maen nhw angen yw cariad, cartref a chyfle, a'n cefnogaeth a'n cymorth ni iddyn nhw fedru cael y pethau hynny. O wrando ar rethreg Boris Johnson a'i Lywodraeth, byddai rhywun yn meddwl taw dyma'n union yr ydym yn ei gynnig i ffoaduriaid Wcráin, ond dro ar ôl tro ym myd gwleidyddiaeth, gwelwn fod gagendor yn bodoli rhwng rhethreg gynnes y rhai sydd mewn grym â'u gweithredoedd llugoer. Ac mae ymateb Llywodraeth San Steffan i'r sefyllfa yn Wcráin, yn anffodus, yn enghraifft berffaith o hyn. Mae Llywodraeth San Steffan, er gwaethaf eu geiriau twym, yn gadael pobl Wcráin lawr. Mae llysgennad Wcráin i'r Deyrnas Gyfunol wedi galw ar yr Ysgrifennydd Cartref i weithredu ar frys i wella'r broses fisa, sydd, yn ei eiriau fe, yn ddiangen o hir a biwrocrataidd, gan adael miloedd o bobl yn ddiymadferth ar hyd a lled gwledydd tir mawr Ewrop. Ac mae Cyngor Ffoaduriaid Cymru wedi clywed am rwystredigaeth y teuluoedd sy'n cyrraedd yma ar y cynllun teuluoedd yn hytrach nag ar gynllun Cartrefi i Wcráin, a bod y Cymry sy'n cynnig lloches iddyn nhw yn anghymwys i dderbyn y taliad o £350. Mae hyn yn anghyfiawnder cwbl sylfaenol, ac yn enghraifft o'r Swyddfa Gartref yn trosglwyddo eu cyfrifoldebau moesol i'r cyhoedd, â nifer o'r ffoaduriaid yn wynebu heriau, fel clywsom ni, o ran diffyg cefnogaeth a gwybodaeth, diffyg gwersi iaith, a'r ffaith bod cofrestru ar gyfer ysgol a meddyg teulu yn absẃrd o gymhleth. Sut mae Llywodraeth Cymru am oresgyn yr anghysonderau hyn, yn wyneb difaterwch a blerwch anhrefnus Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Gyfunol? Mae 2,300 o fisas wedi eu cyhoeddi yng Nghymru o dan y cynllun Cartrefi i Wcráin. Ac fel y gwnaethoch chi sôn, o'r rhain, 670 wedi'u huwch-noddi gan Lywodraeth Cymru. Mae'r Alban wedi cael 5,200 o fisas wedi eu cyhoeddi, gyda 3,000 ohonynt wedi'u huwch-noddi gan Lywodraeth yr Alban. Mae'r bwlch yma rhwng y ddwy wlad yn eithaf sylweddol. Felly, a all y Gweinidog egluro'r rheswm dros yr anghysondeb hwn rhwng Cymru a'r Alban? Ydy'r Gweinidog yn ffyddiog nad oes unrhyw ffactor y tu hwnt i hap a damwain yn gyfrifol am hyn? Mae'n debygol y bydd ffoaduriaid sy'n cyrraedd yma, yn enwedig menywod a phlant sy'n agored i niwed, eisoes wedi dioddef trawma. Ac felly, fel y gwnaethoch chi sôn, ac fel y gwnaeth Mark Isherwood sôn, mae sicrhau eu bod yn ddiogel ac yn cael gofal pan fyddant yn cyrraedd yn hollbwysig, ac rwy'n croesawu yr hyn yr ydych wedi sôn amdano fo o ran sut rŷch chi'n ceisio mynd i'r afael â hyn. Ond mae nifer o fudiadau ffoaduriaid a gwrth-fasnachu pobl wedi ysgrifennu at Michael Gove i fynegi eu pryderon dwys ynghylch diogelu, a'r cynllun, gyda masnachwyr pobl eisoes yn targedu pobl, menywod a phlant o Wcráin. Dyma sefyllfa cwbl dorcalonnus, sy'n cyferbynnu'n llwyr gyda rhethreg Llywodraeth Prydain. Nid oes unrhyw reswm pam na ddylem neu y gallem gael cynllun cwbl ddyngarol, sy'n croesawu ffoaduriaid, ac sy'n eu diogelu'n llwyr rhag camdriniaeth. Doedd e ddim yn swnio i fi fel bod y Gweinidog yn hollol fodlon bod y gwiriadau hyfforddiant a chymorth proffesiynol sydd ar waith ar hyn o bryd ynghylch y cynllun yma yng Nghymru yn ddigonol i sicrhau diogelwch i ffoaduriaid Wcráin. Felly, beth mwy y gellir ei wneud? Diolch.