English: I'll happily deal with that last point first. We expect to improve our ability to plan for the current and future workforce through the creation of Health Education and Improvement Wales - we talked about that previously - and the way in which we're trying to pool the ability to do so between health boards and other organisations like the deanery and others too. That's a positive step forward to having a more strategic approach to planning for our future workforce need. As well as looking at the numbers of staff that we need and in different groups of staff, we of course need to look at the ways in which we expect them to work, and the ways we expect them to be trained to then work within the service of today and the future. That's why the parliamentary review matters so much. We need to have models of care that are attractive for people to work in, and to get us the best prospect of people wanting to come and make their career in Wales. You may say to train here, to live here and to work here, of course. Now, I want to go back to your starting points about the pay cap. I've been incredibly disappointed about the way in which Plaid Cymru have been quite happy to give the Tories a free pass on this. The reason why Wales could not move on the pay cap before was because of our budgetary position, because of eight years of austerity. That is the clear and unalloyed truth, and the way in which those matters have been handled here have been very clear. We have always been clear that this was an issue for the United Kingdom Government to raise the pay cap and to fund raising the pay cap from the UK Treasury, as they have done today, at last. But the war of words between us will not stop because, unfortunately, Jeremy Hunt compounded previous statements that are simply not factually true by saying in the House of Commons that the health service in Wales would be £1 billion pounds better off if we had taken decisions as they have done. That is just a straight lie. And if we're going to have a properly informed debate about the future funding of the national health service, then there needs to be a more honest discourse between parliaments and governments, and with the public, and I will not hesitate from calling Jeremy Hunt out for what he is when he makes untrue, and knowingly untrue statements about NHS finance here in Wales.
Welsh: Rwy'n hapus i ymdrin â'r pwynt olaf hwnnw yn gyntaf. Rydym yn disgwyl y byddwn yn gwella ein gallu i gynllunio ar gyfer y gweithlu cyfredol a gweithlu'r dyfodol drwy greu Addysg a Gwella Iechyd Cymru - rydym wedi sôn am hwnnw o'r blaen - a'r ffordd rydym yn ceisio cronni'r gallu i wneud hynny rhwng byrddau iechyd a sefydliadau eraill fel y ddeoniaeth ac eraill hefyd. Mae hwnnw'n gam cadarnhaol ymlaen i sicrhau dull mwy strategol o gynllunio ar gyfer anghenion ein gweithlu yn y dyfodol. Yn ogystal ag edrych ar niferoedd y staff rydym eu hangen, a'r gwahanol grwpiau o staff, mae angen i ni edrych, wrth gwrs, ar y ffyrdd rydym yn disgwyl iddynt weithio, a'r ffyrdd rydym yn disgwyl iddynt gael eu hyfforddi i weithio yn y gwasanaeth heddiw ac yn y dyfodol. Dyna pam y mae'r adolygiad seneddol mor bwysig. Mae angen i ni gael modelau gofal sy'n ddeniadol i bobl weithio ynddynt, ac sy'n cynnig y gobaith mwyaf y bydd pobl eisiau dilyn gyrfa yng Nghymru. Gallech ddweud i hyfforddi yma, i fyw yma ac i weithio yma, wrth gwrs. Nawr, rwyf am ddychwelyd at eich pwyntiau cychwynnol am y cap cyflog. Rwyf wedi cael fy siomi'n ofnadwy gan y ffordd y mae Plaid Cymru wedi bod yn ddigon bodlon i roi rhwydd hynt i'r Torïaid mewn perthynas â hyn. Y rheswm pam na allai Cymru godi'r cap cyflog yn gynt oedd oherwydd ein sefyllfa gyllidebol, oherwydd wyth mlynedd o gyni. Dyna'r gwirionedd clir a digymysg, ac mae'r ffordd y mae'r materion hynny wedi cael eu trin yma wedi bod yn glir iawn. Rydym bob amser wedi dweud yn glir mai mater i Lywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig oedd codi'r cap cyflog a sicrhau cyllid gan Drysorlys y DU i gyllido codi'r cap cyflog, fel y maent wedi'i wneud heddiw, o'r diwedd. Ond ni fydd y rhyfel geiriau rhyngom yn dod i ben oherwydd, yn anffodus, mae Jeremy Hunt wedi cymhlethu datganiadau blaenorol nad ydynt, yn syml, yn ffeithiol gywir, drwy ddweud, yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin, y byddai'r gwasanaeth iechyd yng Nghymru £1 biliwn o bunnoedd yn well ei fyd pe baem wedi gwneud penderfyniadau fel y maent hwy wedi gwneud. Mae hynny'n gelwydd noeth. Ac os ydym am gael dadl wybodus a phriodol am ariannu'r gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol yn y dyfodol, mae angen trafodaeth fwy gonest rhwng seneddau a llywodraethau, a chyda'r cyhoedd, ac ni fyddaf yn petruso rhag herio Jeremy Hunt pan fydd yn gwneud datganiadau celwyddog, a bwriadol gelwyddog, am gyllid y GIG yma yng Nghymru.