techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: If I can just make a point about what Dawn said, fees are higher in some cases than Dawn Bowden suggested. It now costs around £1,250 for an unfair dismissal claim. Claimants are able to apply for remission of fees, but many people will need assistance doing so. Many people will also need help with issuing the claim and conducting it. The citizens advice bureau has long been a source of free advice and guidance, not only on employment matters, but on other issues - but I know how stretched that service has become. How would you propose to support the CAB in Wales?
Welsh: Os caf fi wneud pwynt ynglŷn â'r hyn a ddywedodd Dawn, mae'r ffioedd yn uwch, mewn rhai achosion, nag yr awgrymodd Dawn Bowden. Mae bellach yn costio oddeutu £1,250 i wneud hawliad diswyddo annheg. Gall hawlwyr wneud cais i beidio â thalu ffioedd, ond bydd llawer o bobl angen cymorth i wneud hynny. Bydd llawer o bobl angen cymorth gyda chyflwyno'r hawliad a'i drin. Mae'r ganolfan cyngor ar bopeth wedi bod yn ffynhonnell o gyngor ac arweiniad am ddim ers peth amser, nid yn unig ar faterion cyflogaeth, ond ar faterion eraill - ond rwy'n gwybod cymaint o bwysau sydd ar y gwasanaeth hwnnw. Sut y byddech yn argymell cefnogi'r ganolfan cyngor ar bopeth yng Nghymru?
English: The Welsh Government supports the CAB by actually funding advice and support through various advice agencies. Of course, the most effective way of gaining support in occupational matters is by actually belonging to a trade union, and of course the UK Government seems to spend most of its time looking at legislation that actually inhibits and restricts the role and operation of trade unions. I have to say that this area of work has never been properly recognised by the UK Government and by the Conservative Party.
Welsh: Mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn cefnogi'r ganolfan cyngor ar bopeth mewn gwirionedd drwy ariannu cyngor a chymorth drwy asiantaethau cynghori amrywiol. Wrth gwrs, y ffordd fwyaf effeithiol o sicrhau cymorth mewn materion galwedigaethol yw drwy fod yn aelod o undeb llafur mewn gwirionedd, ac wrth gwrs, ymddengys bod Llywodraeth y DU yn treulio'r rhan fwyaf o'i hamser yn edrych ar ddeddfwriaeth sy'n rhwystro ac yn cyfyngu ar rôl a gweithrediad undebau llafur. Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud nad yw'r maes gwaith hwn erioed wedi cael ei gydnabod yn briodol gan Lywodraeth y DU na'r Blaid Geidwadol.
English: The recommendations relating to the personal development and career progression of lower-ranking judges and tribunal members could have a positive impact on career opportunities for the Welsh tribunal judiciary.
Welsh: Gallai'r argymhellion sy'n ymwneud â datblygiad personol a gallu barnwyr ar safle is ac aelodau tribiwnlysoedd i gamu ymlaen yn eu gyrfa effeithio'n gadarnhaol ar gyfleoedd gyrfaol i'r farnwriaeth dribiwnlysoedd yng Nghymru.
English: Can I thank the Counsel General for that response? The report concludes that a purely organic approach to increasing diversity means that change is happening far too slowly and calls for systematic and structural changes to promote change. Does the Counsel General agree? What discussions has he had in respect of how the Welsh Government can contribute to the change process? It's not a huge improvement if a public-school man is replaced by a public-school woman. We want real diversity.
Welsh: A gaf fi ddiolch i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol am ei ateb? Daw'r adroddiad i'r casgliad fod ymagwedd hollol organig tuag at ehangu amrywiaeth yn golygu bod newid yn digwydd yn llawer rhy araf, a geilw am newidiadau systematig a strwythurol er mwyn hybu newid. A yw'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol yn cytuno? Pa drafodaethau a gafodd ynglŷn â sut y gall Llywodraeth Cymru gyfrannu at y broses o newid? Nid yw'n welliant enfawr os yw menyw a addysgwyd yn breifat yn dod yn lle dyn a addysgwyd yn breifat. Rydym yn awyddus i weld gwir amrywiaeth.
English: Thank you for that supplementary question. Of course, you raise some of the points that were very much raised in the Justice report, which effectively said that the senior judiciary is dominated by privately educated white men and may need targets with teeth to improve diversity on the bench. There is, of course, a significant process of change under way at the moment, and the study by the reform group Justice, which the Member has referred to, is in fact very highly critical of the slow progress that's been made, as in fact have been senior members of the judiciary themselves. So, we wait to see the outcome of those considerations, but they have described very much that the failure to ensure that the judiciary reflects the UK's ethnic, gender and social composition has become a serious constitutional issue. We are very alert to these issues in respect of that part of the judiciary that comes within the responsibility of Welsh Government. In representations that we make, we make very clearly the points in respect of diversity. We also make the point very strongly that it is vital that there is Welsh representation in the higher courts by judges with a knowledge and understanding of devolution and the law as it applies to Wales. So, those two aspects are very much within Welsh Government consideration in any opportunity there is to promote that increased diversity that we all want to see.
Welsh: Diolch am eich cwestiwn atodol. Wrth gwrs, rydych yn codi rhai o'r pwyntiau a wnaed yn glir yn adroddiad Justice, a ddywedai, i bob pwrpas, fod yr uwch farnwriaeth yn cael ei dominyddu gan ddynion gwyn a addysgwyd yn breifat, ac efallai y byddai angen targedau beiddgar er mwyn ehangu amrywiaeth ar y fainc. Wrth gwrs, mae proses o newid sylweddol yn mynd rhagddi ar hyn o bryd, ac mae'r astudiaeth y cyfeiriodd yr Aelod ati gan y grŵp diwygio Justice yn feirniadol iawn, fel rhai o uwch aelodau'r farnwriaeth eu hunain mewn gwirionedd, o'r cynnydd araf a wnaed. Felly, rydym yn aros i weld canlyniad yr ystyriaethau hynny, ond maent wedi disgrifio i raddau helaeth iawn fod y methiant i sicrhau bod y farnwriaeth yn adlewyrchu cyfansoddiad ethnig, cyfansoddiad o ran y rhywiau a chyfansoddiad cymdeithasol y DU wedi dod yn fater cyfansoddiadol o bwys. Rydym yn effro iawn i'r materion hyn mewn perthynas â'r rhan honno o'r farnwriaeth y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn gyfrifol amdani. Yn y sylwadau a wnawn, rydym yn gwneud y pwyntiau sy'n ymwneud ag amrywiaeth yn glir iawn. Rydym hefyd yn gwneud y pwynt, yn gryf iawn, ei bod yn hanfodol fod cynrychiolaeth Gymreig yn y llysoedd uwch gan farnwyr â gwybodaeth a dealltwriaeth o ddatganoli a'r gyfraith fel y mae'n gymwys i Gymru. Felly, mae'r ddwy agwedd honno'n bendant yn cael eu hystyried gan Lywodraeth Cymru pan fo unrhyw gyfle i hyrwyddo'r amrywiaeth ehangach rydym oll yn awyddus i'w gweld.
English: Members will know that my advice is legally privileged. Proposals to legislate for zero-hours contracts would require detailed analysis of legislative competence, having regard to the particular factual circumstances and context.
Welsh: Bydd yr Aelodau'n ymwybodol fod fy nghyngor yn gyfreithiol freintiedig. Byddai cynigion i ddeddfu ar gontractau dim oriau yn galw am ddadansoddiad manwl o gymhwysedd deddfwriaethol sy'n ystyried yr amgylchiadau a'r cyd-destun ffeithiol penodol.
English: I thank him for that answer. Exploitative employment conditions are a major scourge of the modern economy and finding a way to outlaw exploitative employment is an absolute priority for us on these benches. I welcome commitments by the UK Labour Party to use reserved powers in Westminster to ban exploitative employment across the UK. Given his answer about the competence of this place, what does he make of attempts by Plaid Cymru to attach amendments to other legislation that cannot genuinely tackle this blight and put that legislation at risk, even if it secures a good headline for Plaid?
Welsh: Diolch iddo am ei ateb. Mae amodau cyflogaeth camfanteisiol yn bla difrifol ar yr economi fodern, ac mae dod o hyd i ffordd o wahardd cyflogaeth gamfanteisiol yn flaenoriaeth absoliwt i ni ar y meinciau hyn. Rwy'n croesawu ymrwymiadau gan Blaid Lafur y DU i ddefnyddio pwerau a gedwir yn San Steffan i wahardd cyflogaeth gamfanteisiol ledled y DU. O ystyried ei ateb ynglŷn â chymhwysedd y lle hwn, beth yw ei farn ynglŷn ag ymdrechion Plaid Cymru i atodi diwygiadau i ddeddfwriaeth arall na all fynd i'r afael â'r malltod hwn o ddifrif, ac sy'n peryglu'r ddeddfwriaeth honno, hyd yn oed os yw hynny'n sicrhau pennawd da i Blaid Cymru?
English: Well, perhaps to help test that central competence question, Welsh Government can of course try and offer advice and guidance, as you've just mentioned, Counsel General. If so, what status does that have in terms of non-compliance and how would you view the fact that, on my last set of figures, Bridgend County Borough Council, until last week, employed almost 350 staff on zero-hours contracts? Would you think that complies with the sort of mission that you have against unfair use of those contracts?
Welsh: Wel, er mwyn helpu i brofi'r cwestiwn canolog ynglŷn â chymhwysedd, efallai y gall Llywodraeth Cymru geisio cynnig cyngor ac arweiniad, wrth gwrs, fel rydych newydd sôn, Cwnsler Cyffredinol. Os felly, pa statws sydd i hynny o ran diffyg cydymffurfio, a beth yw eich barn ynglŷn â'r ffaith fod Cyngor Bwrdeistref Sirol Pen-y-bont ar Ogwr, tan yr wythnos diwethaf, yn ôl fy set ddiwethaf o ffigurau, yn cyflogi bron i 350 aelod o staff ar gontractau dim oriau? A ydych yn credu bod hynny'n cydsynio â'r math o genhadaeth sydd gennych yn erbyn defnydd annheg o'r contractau hynny?
English: Well, the code of practice on ethical employment in supply chains is there. It's there for public bodies to take into account when it comes to consideration of future contracts. Obviously, the expectation is that all public bodies will have regard to that particular code. Any further steps that can be taken by Welsh Government will have to ensure that they are actually compliant with the competence that this Assembly actually has. Members will be well aware of the issues that arose in the agriculture (Wales) Act - incidentally, something that the Member's party actually opposed - which actually gave a very clear understanding of the way in which competence is considered under the conferred-powers model. Of course, we will, in due course, be changing to a different model, a reserved-powers model, in the future. The guidance that's issued is voluntary, but we would expect compliance with it. And of course I have no doubt whatsoever that the Minister will want to see a system where it is reviewed in due course in the future.
Welsh: Wel, mae'r cod ymarfer ar gyflogaeth foesegol mewn cadwyni cyflenwi ar waith. Mae'n bodoli er mwyn i gyrff cyhoeddus roi sylw iddo wrth ystyried contractau yn y dyfodol. Yn amlwg, disgwylir y bydd pob corff cyhoeddus yn ystyried y cod penodol hwnnw. Bydd yn rhaid i unrhyw gamau pellach y gall Llywodraeth Cymru eu cymryd sicrhau eu bod yn cydymffurfio â'r cymhwysedd sydd gan y Cynulliad hwn mewn gwirionedd. Bydd yr Aelodau'n ymwybodol iawn o'r materion a gododd yn y Ddeddf amaethyddiaeth (Cymru) - rhywbeth yr oedd plaid yr Aelod yn ei wrthwynebu, gyda llaw - ac a roddodd ddealltwriaeth glir iawn mewn gwirionedd o'r ffordd yr ystyrir cymhwysedd o dan y model rhoi pwerau. Wrth gwrs, byddwn yn newid i fodel gwahanol maes o law, model cadw pwerau, yn y dyfodol. Mae'r canllawiau a gyhoeddir yn wirfoddol, ond byddem yn disgwyl cydymffurfiaeth â hwy. Ac wrth gwrs, nid oes gennyf unrhyw amheuaeth o gwbl y bydd y Gweinidog yn awyddus i weld system lle caiff hynny ei adolygu maes o law yn y dyfodol.
English: Thank you for your answers on the subject so far. It's good that there is at least a code of practice that you've drawn up, but the point that Plaid made last week through Adam Price on the zero-hours issue was that you've laid claim to legal competence over the public sector employment area in your putting through the trade union Act, so it seems inconsistent with your approach to zero-hours contracts.
Welsh: Diolch am eich atebion ar y pwnc hyd yn hyn. Mae'n dda eich bod wedi llunio cod ymarfer, o leiaf, ond y pwynt a wnaeth Plaid Cymru yr wythnos diwethaf drwy Adam Price ar fater contractau dim oriau oedd eich bod wedi hawlio cymhwysedd cyfreithiol dros faes cyflogaeth y sector cyhoeddus drwy gyflwyno Deddf yr undebau llafur, felly ymddengys bod hynny'n anghyson â'ch ymagwedd at gontractau dim oriau.
English: There's no inconsistency. Any set of circumstances where there is a piece of legislation or an amendment that is proposed has to be considered in the light of the legislative competence that we actually have. That's the point I made, I think, in my first answer, and that is that we have regard to the particular factual circumstances and context. And in the light of that, the issue of competence is decided upon.
Welsh: Nid oes unrhyw anghysondeb. Mae'n rhaid ystyried unrhyw set o amgylchiadau lle cynigir darn o ddeddfwriaeth neu ddiwygiad yng ngoleuni'r cymhwysedd deddfwriaethol sydd gennym mewn gwirionedd. Credaf mai dyna'r pwynt a wneuthum yn fy ateb cyntaf, sef ein bod yn ystyried yr amgylchiadau a'r cyd-destun ffeithiol penodol. Ac yng ngoleuni hynny, penderfynir ar gymhwysedd.
English: Well, every year, the national health services across the UK lose out on millions of pounds due to some pharmaceutical companies breaching European and domestic competition law. We work very closely and effectively with the Department of Health, and the other devolved administrations, who share our interest in these issues, to recover our losses, and where there are grounds for legal action.
Welsh: Wel, bob blwyddyn, mae'r gwasanaethau iechyd cenedlaethol ledled y DU yn colli miliynau o bunnoedd o ganlyniad i'r ffaith fod rhai cwmnïau fferyllol yn torri cyfreithiau cystadlu Ewropeaidd a domestig. Rydym yn gweithio'n agos ac yn effeithiol iawn gyda'r Adran Iechyd, a'r gweinyddiaethau datganoledig eraill, sy'n rhannu ein diddordeb yn y materion hyn, i adennill ein colledion, a lle ceir sail dros roi camau cyfreithiol ar waith.
English: Thank you, Counsel General. It's clear from the scale of recent finds that the Welsh Government is at significant cost risk from some pharmaceutical companies, which appear to be working together to fix prices. Does the Counsel General believe that this risk will increase as a result of our exit from the European Union, and what steps has the Welsh Government taken in order to protect the Welsh NHS post Brexit?
Welsh: Diolch, Cwnsler Cyffredinol. Mae'n amlwg o lefel y canfyddiadau diweddar fod Llywodraeth Cymru yn wynebu risg sylweddol o gostau am fod rhai cwmnïau fferyllol i'w gweld fel pe baent yn gweithio gyda'i gilydd i bennu prisiau. A yw'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol yn credu y bydd y risg yn cynyddu wrth inni adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, a pha gamau y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi'u cymryd i ddiogelu GIG Cymru ar ôl Brexit?
English: The Member will know that this answer is subject to the established law officers' convention and that I do not publicly discuss such meetings.
Welsh: Bydd yr Aelodau'n gwybod bod yr ateb hwn yn amodol ar gonfensiwn sefydledig swyddogion y gyfraith ac nad wyf yn trafod cyfarfodydd o'r fath yn gyhoeddus.
English: Thank you for that usual response. Does the Counsel General happen to agree with me, however, that the part of the justice system that's most easily devolved in terms of the law, and the constitution as well, would be policing? And as the First Minister informed the Chamber yesterday that he is strongly in favour of the devolution of policing, and as we are to have a debate on the issue in some 15 minutes' time, what steps is the Welsh Government taking now, with the advice of the Counsel General, to ensure that the necessary constitutional steps are in place to allow that to happen?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb arferol. Ydy'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol yn digwydd cytuno â fi, serch hynny, mai'r rhan o'r gyfundrefn sydd fwyaf hawdd i ddatganoli o ran y gyfraith, ac o ran cyfansoddiad hefyd, fyddai heddlua? A chan fod y Prif Weinidog wedi dweud wrth y Siambr ddoe ei fod yntau yn gryf iawn o blaid datganoli heddlua, a chan ein bod ni yn cynnal dadl o fewn ryw chwarter awr, efallai, ar y mater yma hefyd, pa gamau, felly, mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn eu cymryd nawr, gyda chyngor y Cwnsler Cyffredinol, i sicrhau bod y camau cyfansoddiadol yn eu lle i ganiatáu i hynny ddigwydd?
English: Well, any constitutional steps with regard to the devolution of policing actually require a change in the law, and it isn't really appropriate for me to step on the toes of the First Minister in his description and his proposals in respect of any policy changes he feels are appropriate. But, of course, he did make very clear yesterday in this Chamber what the Welsh Government's position is with regard to the devolution of policing.
Welsh: Wel, mae unrhyw gamau cyfansoddiadol mewn perthynas â datganoli plismona yn galw am newid yn y gyfraith mewn gwirionedd ac nid yw'n briodol i mi sathru ar draed y Prif Weinidog yn ei ddisgrifiad a'i argymhellion gogyfer ag unrhyw newidiadau polisi y teimla eu bod yn briodol. Ond wrth gwrs, gwnaeth yn glir iawn ddoe yn y Siambr hon beth yw safbwynt Llywodraeth Cymru mewn perthynas â datganoli plismona.
English: Members will again know that my advice is legally privileged and subject to the law officers' convention, but I do fully support the Welsh Government commitment to improving air quality across Wales and its various initiatives to tackle air pollution.
Welsh: Bydd yr Aelodau unwaith eto yn gwybod bod fy nghyngor yn gyfreithiol freintiedig ac yn amodol ar gonfensiwn sefydledig swyddogion y gyfraith, ond rwy'n llwyr gefnogi ymrwymiad Llywodraeth Cymru i wella ansawdd aer ledled Cymru a'i mentrau amrywiol i fynd i'r afael â llygredd aer.
English: I thank the Counsel General for his reply. We did, of course, have a debate about this yesterday on the Public Health (Wales) Bill, and the Minister confirmed during that debate that the current powers that Welsh Ministers have are under section 80 of the Environment Act 1995. I think there are two problems with this. One is that that was initially passed, of course, before devolution, and therefore, the powers that Welsh Ministers have are administrative devolution powers, rather than a devolution of legislation that's taken place. And secondly, as far as I can see, that Environment Act, though it places an obligation on Ministers to produce strategies around air pollution, has no obligation to reduce air pollution, in other words to improve the situation. So, you can respond to the legislation without doing anything about it. And, obviously, that's 20 years ago, and that's why I'm so keen that we should relook at this. And in particular, with the knowledge that we have that, with withdrawing from the European Union, we will lose that wider framework of European environmental legislation, does the Counsel General not think that in his ongoing work of the codification of Welsh legislation air pollution is one such area where we need and deserve specific Welsh legislation?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol am ei ateb. Wrth gwrs, cawsom ddadl ynglŷn â hyn ddoe ar Fil Iechyd y Cyhoedd (Cymru), a chadarnhaodd y Gweinidog yn ystod y ddadl honno fod pwerau presennol Gweinidogion Cymru yn dod o dan adran 80 o Ddeddf yr Amgylchedd 1995. Credaf fod dwy broblem gyda hyn. Un yw bod y ddeddf honno wedi cael ei phasio yn y lle cyntaf, wrth gwrs, cyn datganoli, ac felly, mae'r pwerau sydd gan Weinidogion Cymru yn bwerau datganoli gweinyddol, yn hytrach na bod deddfwriaeth wedi'i datganoli. Ac yn ail, hyd y gwelaf, er ei bod yn gosod rhwymedigaeth ar Weinidogion i gynhyrchu strategaethau mewn perthynas â llygredd aer, nid yw Deddf yr Amgylchedd yn cynnwys unrhyw rwymedigaeth i leihau llygredd aer, neu i wella'r sefyllfa, mewn geiriau eraill. Felly, gallwch ymateb i'r ddeddfwriaeth heb wneud unrhyw beth amdani. Ac yn amlwg, roedd hynny 20 mlynedd yn ôl, a dyna pam rwyf mor awyddus i ni ailedrych ar hyn. Ac yn benodol, gyda'r wybodaeth sydd gennym y byddwn, wrth adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, yn colli'r fframwaith ehangach hwnnw o ddeddfwriaeth amgylcheddol Ewropeaidd, onid yw'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol o'r farn, yn ei waith parhaus ar godeiddio'r ddeddfwriaeth Gymreig, fod llygredd aer yn faes lle mae angen a lle rydym yn haeddu deddfwriaeth Gymreig benodol?
English: Well, as the Member will be aware, the process of codification, if I might deal with the last point, is not, of course, about reforming the law, it's about codifying the existing law, and the issue that any reforms or changes need to be made are a totally separate matter and, of course, would require a totally different level of consideration, consultation and scrutiny. In terms of the policy matter that the Member raises, well, of course, that is a matter for another Minister and it's not appropriate for me to cross into that particular territory. What I can say, by way, I suppose, of repeating some of the points that have been already made by Ministers in this area, is that the Welsh Government is firmly committed to improving air quality across Wales, and is tackling air pollution in a number of ways, and, of course, these were outlined yesterday in the debate and are there in the transcript. And of course, Welsh Government is currently working on improvements to 'Planning Policy Wales' in relation to air quality and there is a consultation under way. The Member might be referring, of course, to the nitrogen dioxide issues, which is clearly an area of concern, and as of last week, the Welsh Government is consulting jointly with other UK administrations seeking views on a revised plan to reduce levels of nitrogen dioxide around roads within the shortest time possible. I think any other areas, really, are policy matters, which should be referred to the appropriate Minister.
Welsh: Wel, fel y bydd yr Aelod yn gwybod, nid yw'r broses o godeiddio, wrth gwrs, os caf ymdrin â'r pwynt olaf, yn ymwneud â diwygio'r gyfraith, mae'n ymwneud â chodeiddio'r gyfraith sy'n bodoli eisoes, ac mae'r angen i wneud unrhyw ddiwygiadau neu newidiadau yn fater hollol ar wahân ac wrth gwrs, byddai angen eu hystyried, ymgynghori yn eu cylch a chraffu arnynt ar lefel hollol wahanol. O ran y mater polisi y mae'r Aelod yn ei godi, wel, wrth gwrs, mae hwnnw'n fater i Weinidog arall ac nid yw'n briodol i mi groesi i'r diriogaeth benodol honno. Yr hyn y gallaf ei ddweud, drwy ailadrodd rhai o'r pwyntiau a wnaed eisoes gan Weinidogion yn y maes hwn, rwy'n tybio, yw bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ymrwymo'n gadarn i wella ansawdd yr aer ledled Cymru, a'i bod yn mynd i'r afael â llygredd aer mewn nifer o ffyrdd, ac wrth gwrs, amlinellwyd y rhain yn y ddadl ddoe ac maent yno yn y trawsgrifiad. Ac wrth gwrs, mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn gweithio ar welliannau i 'Polisi Cynllunio Cymru' ar hyn o bryd mewn perthynas ag ansawdd aer ac mae ymgynghoriad ar y gweill. Mae'n bosibl fod yr Aelod yn cyfeirio, wrth gwrs, at y materion sy'n ymwneud â nitrogen deuocsid, sy'n amlwg yn destun pryder, ac ers yr wythnos ddiwethaf, mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn ymgynghori ar y cyd â gweinyddiaethau eraill y DU ac yn ceisio barn ar gynllun diwygiedig i leihau lefelau nitrogen deuocsid ger ffyrdd mewn cyn lleied o amser ag sy'n bosibl. Rwy'n credu bod unrhyw feysydd eraill, mewn gwirionedd, yn faterion polisi, a dylid eu cyfeirio at y Gweinidog priodol.
English: The next item on our agenda is the topical questions, and the first question comes from Simon Thomas.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf ar ein hagenda yw'r cwestiynau amserol, ac mae'r cwestiwn cyntaf gan Simon Thomas.
English: What assessment has the Welsh Government made of the European Court of Justice's ruling on the breach of clean water rules in Wales, including at Burry Inlet near Llanelli? TAQ (5) 0134 (ERA) [W]
Welsh: Pa asesiad y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi'i wneud o ddyfarniad Llys Cyfiawnder Ewrop ynghylch torri rheolau dŵr glân yng Nghymru, gan gynnwys yng Nghilfach Tywyn ger Llanelli? TAQ (5) 0134 (ERA) [W]