English: Well, that was quite a comprehensive list of things. We sent a consultation document out, which I hope all Members have received, and that has a web link in it to an interactive map. If you go on to that map, which I hope at least some Members will have had the opportunity to do already, you'll be able to see that you can go down to individual premises level. And there's an icon on the top of each individual premises that says what we think is happening in that particular building. So, you should be able to see whether it's a square, a triangle or a red dot, or whatever, and there's a key along the side of it that tells you what those symbols mean: more than one provider, only one provider, only wireless, and so on. We're very, very keen to ensure that that information is as accurate as possible, so we really would like to get as wide a consultation as possible on that. So, for those of you who have constituents who've written to me, or you've written to me about groups of people or communities, I'd be really grateful if you'd check the maps to make sure that the information matches what you understand to be the case. In terms of some of the other questions, on the number of premises, the contractual commitment for BT is about the number of premises; it was never a percentage. The percentage that was talked about in 2011 was the percentage of premises available in Wales in 2011. I mean, quite clearly, a lot more premises have been built since 2011 to now, so you would never have expected the number to stay the same. Indeed, that's one of the issues that several Members in the Chamber have highlighted, because there was a big issue in the open market review about new-build premises afterwards. They weren't included, and that's been a constant problem, and I'm expecting to have to address that. The other thing is that the way that the mapping has been done is a lot more accurate. I've already checked my own constituency area this morning, just out of interest, and you can immediately see that some of the premises identified are statues, for example, and I'm pretty sure they won't want to be broadband enabled. Others are: there's a reservoir identified in my constituency, which I don't think needs broadband, although I could check with Welsh Water as to whether they have some kind of service that they might need at the reservoir and so on. So, the mapping is a great deal more accurate than it was in 2011, but it's not as accurate as we'd like it to be and we'd very much like information back from you about the accuracy or otherwise of that. There's absolutely no point in us trying to get all the way up a track to a barn if, actually, nobody lives in it, for example. That takes me onto the next thing, which is that we have put a great deal more money into demand stimulation. The current take-up is around 35 per cent. BT, as you know, estimated it to be 21 per cent, and we get a gain share for everything over that. It's running at somewhere between 31 and 38 per cent, but the average is about 35 per cent at the moment, and as you'd expect, that's going up all the time. It's more for fibre to the cabinet than fibre to the premises at the moment, but that's because the fibre-to-the-premises build has only very recently really ramped up. So, we're very happy that the take-up exceeds the limit that BT set, because we're getting a good gain share from that, but obviously the higher it climbs, the more money we get and so I'd be more than anxious to talk to you all about ways that you think you can stimulate demand in your local areas. We're trying to do it nationally. I'm writing out to every single premises we think has got superfast asking them to take it up and so on. I'm very interested in looking at communities of interest, as well. We have a completely open book here and I really would be very grateful to AMs who would come back to me about this. Should we try to target all the remaining farmers? Should we try to target all the remaining businesses? Should we try to target only those people who indicate to us they'd actually buy it? Some of these premises will be very expensive to get to. It would be sad to spend the money to get to them, only to find that the homeowner has no intention whatsoever of taking up the offer. It's a genuinely open consultation, I really don't know how we should prioritise it. We're unlikely to actually get fibre cable to every premises in Wales. Clearly, that would be prohibitively expensive for some, so some will have to have alternative technology there. The voucher scheme will continue to be available to those people who are very unlikely to ever get fibre broadband. I'm afraid, if you live 14 miles up a track and you're the only premises up there, it's most unlikely to be economically efficient for us to do that - we'll probably assist with a satellite or some such. So, I am genuinely asking you what the best way of doing this actually is. If we have whole communities who'd like to have wireless, for example - so they'd like to have the broadband provided to a community centre, and then the whole village or community could be covered by a wireless signal instead of wired to each premise - we're very happy to consider that. It's one of the reasons we've adjusted the voucher scheme, so that communities can apply together to do that. As you know, it's individual at the moment. There are other adjustments - Russell, you mentioned the ultrafast thing; we know that some businesses don't want to go all the way to 100, but they need more than 30 and so on. Hefin David, actually - he's not in the Chamber - has raised that with me several times, so have you, and so has David Rees. Clearly, a lot of businesses want that medium product that we're looking at. So, there's a wealth of things that we can do. In terms of capacity issues in the network, we don't pay BT when the cabinet is passed, we pay them when individual premises are passed. They get paid for the number of premises. So, if you think that we've accepted a premises, and, actually, they're not getting it, do let me know because we can adjust that backwards. But I assure you, it's on individual premises. I'm not saying, 'Cabinet 16 is enabled, and therefore all the premises connected to it are getting superfast', because they most certainly are not.
Welsh: Wel, dyna restr eithaf cynhwysfawr o bethau. Anfonwyd dogfen ymgynghori allan, yr wyf yn gobeithio bod yr holl Aelodau wedi'i derbyn, ac mae dolen y we ynddi i fap rhyngweithiol. Os byddwch yn mynd at y map, ac rwy'n gobeithio y bydd o leiaf rhai Aelodau wedi cael cyfle i wneud hynny'n barod, byddwch yn gallu gweld eich bod yn gallu mynd i lawr at lefel eiddo unigol. Ac mae eicon ar ben pob eiddo unigol sy'n dweud yr hyn yr ydym yn meddwl sy'n digwydd yn yr adeilad penodol hwnnw. Felly, dylech fod yn gallu gweld a yw'n sgwâr, yn driongl neu ddot coch, neu beth bynnag, ac mae allwedd ar hyd yr ochr sy'n dweud wrthych beth y mae'r symbolau hynny yn ei olygu: mwy nag un darparwr, dim ond un darparwr, dim ond diwifr, ac yn y blaen. Rydym yn awyddus iawn, iawn i sicrhau bod yr wybodaeth mor gywir ag y bo modd, felly byddem yn wir yn hoffi cael ymgynghori mor eang ag y bo modd ar hynny. Felly, ar gyfer y rhai ohonoch sydd ag etholwyr sydd wedi ysgrifennu ataf, neu os ydych wedi ysgrifennu ataf ynghylch grwpiau o bobl neu gymunedau, byddwn i'n ddiolchgar iawn pe byddech yn edrych ar y mapiau i sicrhau bod yr wybodaeth yn cyfateb i'r hyn a ddeallwch chi i fod yn wir. O ran rhai o'r cwestiynau eraill, ar y nifer o eiddo, mae'r ymrwymiad cytundebol ar gyfer BT yn ymwneud â nifer yr eiddo; nid oedd erioed yn ganran. Y ganran a nodwyd yn 2011 oedd canran yr eiddo a oedd ar gael yng Nghymru yn 2011. Hynny yw, yn eithaf clir, mae llawer mwy o eiddo wedi eu hadeiladu ers 2011 hyd at nawr, felly fyddech chi byth wedi disgwyl i'r nifer aros yr un fath. Yn wir, dyna un o'r materion y mae sawl un o Aelodau yn y Siambr wedi tynnu sylw ato, oherwydd bod cryn drafod yn yr adolygiad marchnad agored ar y mater o eiddo newydd eu hadeiladu wedyn. Doedden nhw ddim wedi eu cynnwys, ac mae hynny wedi bod yn broblem barhaus, ac rwy'n disgwyl gorfod mynd i'r afael â hynny. Y peth arall yw bod y ffordd y mae'r gwaith mapio wedi ei wneud yn llawer mwy cywir. Rwyf wedi gwirio ardal fy etholaeth i y bore 'ma, dim ond o ran diddordeb, a gallwch weld yn syth mai cerfluniau yw rhai o'r adeiladau a nodwyd, er enghraifft, ac rwy'n eithaf siŵr na fydd angen iddynt gael eu galluogi â band eang. Mae eraill: mae cronfa ddŵr wedi'i nodi yn fy etholaeth i, nad wyf yn credu sydd angen band eang, er y gallwn i holi Dŵr Cymru i weld a oes ganddynt ryw fath o wasanaeth a allai fod ei angen yn y gronfa ddŵr ac yn y blaen. Felly, mae'r gwaith mapio yn llawer mwy cywir nag yr oedd yn 2011, ond nid yw mor gywir ac yr hoffem, a byddem yn ddiolchgar iawn i gael gwybodaeth yn ôl gennych chi am gywirdeb hynny, neu fel arall. Er enghraifft, does dim pwynt i ni geisio mynd yr holl ffordd i fyny llwybr at ysgubor os nad oes neb yn byw ynddo mewn gwirionedd. Mae hynny'n mynd â fi at y peth nesaf, sef ein bod wedi buddsoddi llawer iawn mwy o arian i ysgogi galw. Mae'r gyfradd sy'n manteisio ar y cynllun ar hyn o bryd oddeutu 35 y cant. Yn ôl amcangyfrif BT, fel y gwyddoch, roedd yn 21 y cant, ac rydym yn cael rhannu enillion am bopeth dros hynny. Mae'n rhywle rhwng 31 a 38 y cant, ond y cyfartaledd yw tua 35 y cant ar hyn o bryd, ac fel y byddech yn disgwyl, mae hynny'n mynd i fyny drwy'r amser. Mae'n fwy ynghylch ffeibr i'r cabinet na ffeibr i'r eiddo ar hyn o bryd, ond mae hynny oherwydd mai dim ond yn ddiweddar yr aed ati o ddifrif i gynyddu adeiladu ffeibr i'r adeilad. Felly, rydym yn hapus iawn bod y niferoedd sy'n manteisio ar y cynllun yn fwy na'r terfyn a osododd BT, gan ein bod yn cael ennill cyfran dda o hynny, ond yn amlwg, po uchaf y mae'n dringo, y mwyaf o arian yr ydym yn ei gael, ac felly byddwn i'n fwy nag awyddus i siarad â chi i gyd am ffyrdd yr ydych yn meddwl y gallwch chi ysgogi galw yn eich ardaloedd lleol. Rydym yn ceisio gwneud hynny yn genedlaethol. Rwy'n ysgrifennu at bob eiddo unigol sydd â chyflymder uchel iawn yn gofyn iddynt fanteisio arno ac yn y blaen. Mae gen i ddiddordeb mawr mewn edrych ar gymunedau o ddiddordeb, yn ogystal. Mae gennym ddalen gwbl wag yma a byddwn wir yn ddiolchgar iawn i'r ACau a fyddai'n dod yn ôl ataf ynghylch hyn. A ddylem ni geisio targedu'r holl ffermwyr sydd ar ôl? A ddylem ni geisio targedu'r holl fusnesau sydd ar ôl? A ddylem geisio targedu dim ond y bobl hynny sy'n dangos i ni y byddent mewn gwirionedd yn ei brynu? Bydd rhai o'r adeiladau hyn yn ddrud iawn i'w cyrraedd. Byddai'n drist i wario'r arian i'w gael atynt, dim ond i ddarganfod nad oes gan berchennog y tŷ unrhyw fwriad o gwbl i fanteisio ar y cynnig. Mae'n ymgynghoriad gwirioneddol agored, nid wyf i wir yn gwybod sut y dylem ei flaenoriaethu. Rydym yn annhebygol o gael cebl ffeibr i bob adeilad yng Nghymru. Yn amlwg, byddai hynny'n rhy ddrud i rai, felly bydd yn rhaid i rai gael technoleg amgen. Bydd y cynllun talebau yn parhau i fod ar gael i'r bobl hynny sy'n annhebygol iawn o gael band eang ffeibr byth. Rwy'n ofni, os ydych yn byw 14 milltir i fyny llwybr a chi yw'r unig adeilad yno, mae'n annhebygol o fod yn effeithlon yn economaidd i ni wneud hynny - yn ôl pob tebyg byddwn yn cynorthwyo gyda lloeren neu rywbeth tebyg. Felly, rwyf wir yn gofyn i chi beth yw'r ffordd orau o wneud hyn mewn gwirionedd. Os oes gennym gymunedau cyfan a hoffai gael diwifr, er enghraifft - felly byddent yn hoffi cael band eang wedi'i ddarparu i ganolfan gymunedol, ac yna gallai'r pentref neu'r gymuned gyfan gael ei gynnwys gan signal diwifr yn hytrach na gwifrau i bob eiddo - rydym yn hapus iawn i ystyried hynny. Mae'n un o'r rhesymau pam yr ydym wedi addasu'r cynllun talebau, fel y gall cymunedau wneud cais gyda'i gilydd i wneud hynny. Fel y gwyddoch, mae'n unigol ar hyn o bryd. Mae addasiadau eraill - Russell, soniasoch am y peth gwibgyswllt; rydym yn gwybod bod rhai busnesau nad ydynt eisiau mynd yr holl ffordd at 100, ond mae angen mwy na 30 ac yn y blaen. Mae Hefin David, mewn gwirionedd - nid yw yn y Siambr - wedi codi hynny gyda mi sawl gwaith, fel yr ydych chi, ac fel y mae David Rees. Yn amlwg, mae llawer o fusnesau eisiau'r cynnyrch canolig hwnnw yr ydym yn edrych arno. Felly, mae yna lawer o bethau y gallwn ni eu gwneud. O ran materion capasiti yn y rhwydwaith, nid ydym yn talu BT pan fydd y cabinet yn cael ei basio, rydym yn eu talu pan fydd eiddo unigol yn cael eu pasio. Maent yn cael eu talu fesul nifer o eiddo. Felly, os ydych chi'n credu ein bod wedi derbyn eiddo, ac, mewn gwirionedd, nad ydynt yn ei gael, gadewch i mi wybod oherwydd gallwn addasu hynny yn ôl. Ond rwy'n eich sicrhau, mae'n ymwneud ag eiddo unigol. Nid wyf yn dweud, 'mae Cabinet 16 wedi cael ei alluogi, ac felly mae'r holl eiddo sy'n gysylltiedig ag ef yn cael band eang cyflym iawn', oherwydd yn sicr nid yw hynny'n wir.