techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I wonder if I can ask you, Minister, as well to pay particular regard to the loss of the European social fund and structural funds on our works and skills programmes in Wales. I'm hearing some rather disconcerting rumours - well, they're more than rumours - that there's an intention now with the Department for Work and Pensions to centralise their work programmes. Now, we've had some exemplary work programmes here in Wales, particularly for those hard-to-reach people who need additional support to get into work because of skills and transport and other challenges they face, and we know how to do it. So, it would be disastrous if there was some centralised, Westminster-driven approach to this that reiterated the problems that they had in the 1980s Thatcher-style work programmes. So, could I please ask, Minister, that you make representations that if these programmes are being redesigned, that when they look for partners to deliver these, they use the local authorities and the regional consortiums that have been delivering them on the ground with great success - far better than in England and elsewhere - in the future as well? We're not only losing the money - it's taken away our ability to control what we do with some very important employment and skills programmes.
Welsh: Weinidog, tybed a gaf fi ofyn i chi roi sylw arbennig i effaith colli cronfa gymdeithasol Ewrop a chronfeydd strwythurol ar ein rhaglenni gwaith a sgiliau yng Nghymru. Rwy'n clywed sibrydion braidd yn ddigalon - wel, maent yn fwy na sibrydion - fod bwriad yn awr gan yr Adran Gwaith a Phensiynau i ganoli eu rhaglenni gwaith. Nawr, rydym wedi cael rhaglenni gwaith rhagorol yma yng Nghymru, yn enwedig i'r bobl anodd eu cyrraedd sydd angen cymorth ychwanegol i gael gwaith oherwydd sgiliau a thrafnidiaeth a heriau eraill y maent yn eu hwynebu, a gwyddom sut i'w wneud. Felly, byddai'n drychinebus pe bai rhyw ddull canolog o wneud hyn, wedi'i lywio gan San Steffan, yn ailadrodd y problemau a oedd ganddynt yn rhaglenni gwaith Thatcheraidd y 1980au. Felly, Weinidog, a gaf fi ofyn i chi gyflwyno sylwadau, os yw'r rhaglenni hyn yn cael eu hailgynllunio, pan fyddant yn chwilio am bartneriaid i'w cyflwyno, eu bod yn defnyddio'r awdurdodau lleol a'r consortia rhanbarthol sydd wedi bod yn eu cyflwyno ar lawr gwlad yn llwyddiannus iawn - yn llawer gwell nag yn Lloegr ac mewn mannau eraill - yn y dyfodol hefyd? Rydym nid yn unig yn colli'r arian - mae wedi dileu ein gallu i reoli'r hyn a wnawn gyda rhaglenni cyflogaeth a sgiliau pwysig iawn.
English: Absolutely. And, obviously, Huw Irranca-Davies speaks with real authority on this having chaired our group, which has been looking at this particular agenda for some time. And he'll know better than anyone about the impact that those EU projects have had in Wales, creating over 56,400 new jobs and 15,400 new businesses since 2007, and also supporting 30,000 business, and helping almost 100,000 people into employment in that time. And that's the kind of thing that we need to keep doing. We have tried to take some early action to mitigate the early impact, so we've been proactive in extending a number of our key economic interventions supported by EU funds that were due to end in the next financial year, to extend them to subsequent years, and this includes support for entrepreneurs and small and medium-sized enterprises currently being delivered by Business Wales. Support for advanced, sustainable manufacturing, investment in business research, development and innovation, and support for low-carbon energy technologies and investment at key tourism sites - these are things that we've been focussing on as we've been preparing our budget for next year.
Welsh: Yn sicr. Ac yn amlwg, mae Huw Irranca-Davies yn siarad ag awdurdod go iawn ar hyn ar ôl cadeirio ein grŵp, sydd wedi bod yn edrych ar yr agenda benodol hon ers peth amser. A bydd yn gwybod yn well na neb am yr effaith y mae'r prosiectau UE hynny wedi'i chael yng Nghymru, gan greu dros 56,400 o swyddi newydd a 15,400 o fusnesau newydd ers 2007, yn ogystal â chefnogi 30,000 o fusnesau, a helpu bron i 100,000 o bobl i gael gwaith yn y cyfnod hwnnw. A dyna'r math o beth y mae angen inni barhau i'w wneud. Rydym wedi ceisio rhoi camau buan ar waith i liniaru'r effaith gynnar, felly rydym wedi bod yn rhagweithiol wrth ymestyn nifer o'n hymyriadau economaidd allweddol a gefnogir gan gronfeydd yr UE a oedd i fod i ddod i ben yn y flwyddyn ariannol nesaf, i'w hymestyn i flynyddoedd dilynol, ac mae hyn yn cynnwys cymorth i entrepreneuriaid a busnesau bach a chanolig eu maint sy'n cael ei ddarparu ar hyn o bryd gan Busnes Cymru. Cymorth ar gyfer gweithgynhyrchu uwch cynaliadwy, buddsoddi mewn ymchwil, datblygu ac arloesi ym maes busnes, a chymorth ar gyfer technolegau ynni carbon isel a buddsoddi mewn safleoedd twristiaeth allweddol - mae'r rhain yn bethau rydym wedi bod yn canolbwyntio arnynt wrth i ni baratoi ein cyllideb ar gyfer y flwyddyn nesaf.
English: Throughout the year, I have engaged with the UK Government on the legacy impacts of the extraordinary flooding in Wales. We have also provided support through our emergency financial assistance scheme, alongside the £390 million we have invested in flood and coastal risk management over this term, benefiting over 45,000 properties.
Welsh: Drwy gydol y flwyddyn, rwyf wedi ymgysylltu â Llywodraeth y DU ynglŷn ag effeithiau etifeddol y llifogydd eithriadol yng Nghymru. Rydym hefyd wedi darparu cymorth drwy ein cynllun cymorth ariannol brys, ochr yn ochr â'r £390 miliwn a fuddsoddwyd gennym ar gyfer rheoli perygl llifogydd ac arfordiroedd dros y tymor hwn, gan sicrhau budd i dros 45,000 eiddo.
English: Can I thank you for the answer, Minister, and can I also thank the Welsh Government for the support they're giving to flood victims in Skewen who have been flooded out because of water coming out of a mine, an old mine workings? The Coal Authority have clearly stated that they are not liable for water damage coming from their mine workings. This was reinforced yesterday in the House of Commons, when the Minister answered my colleague Stephen Kinnock's question on this matter. Now, if the Coal Authority are not taking responsibility, and the UK Government, whose record on this is poor when you consider what's happened in Pontypridd - is it now time for you to press the UK Government for funding from them so we can help these people? Because many citizens in that area haven't got good insurance, and those who have are going to lose money because they have to pay their excess, and there are additional costs on top of that, and they're out of home for long periods of time and that's not being covered. We need to help these people, and it's clear the UK Government is not going to. So, can you therefore press the Treasury for enhanced funding so we can help people in these situations to ensure they are not out of pocket, that they're not in difficulties and we are able to help as soon as possible?
Welsh: A gaf fi ddiolch i chi am yr ateb, Weinidog, ac a gaf fi ddiolch hefyd i Lywodraeth Cymru am y gefnogaeth y maent yn ei rhoi i ddioddefwyr llifogydd yn Sgiwen sydd wedi cael llifogydd oherwydd bod dŵr yn dod allan o bwll glo, hen safle glofaol? Mae'r Awdurdod Glo wedi datgan yn glir nad ydynt yn atebol am ddifrod dŵr sy'n dod o'u safleoedd glofaol. Atgyfnerthwyd hyn ddoe yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin, pan atebodd y Gweinidog gwestiwn fy nghyd-Aelod Stephen Kinnock ar y mater hwn. Nawr, os nad yw'r Awdurdod Glo yn cymryd cyfrifoldeb, a Llywodraeth y DU, y mae ei record ar hyn yn wael pan ystyriwch beth sydd wedi digwydd ym Mhontypridd - a yw'n bryd yn awr i chi bwyso ar Lywodraeth y DU am gyllid ganddynt fel y gallwn helpu'r bobl hyn? Oherwydd nid oes yswiriant da gan lawer o ddinasyddion yn yr ardal honno, ac mae'r rhai sydd ag yswiriant da yn mynd i golli arian am fod yn rhaid iddynt dalu eu tâl-dros-ben, a cheir costau ychwanegol ar ben hynny, ac maent allan o'u cartref am gyfnodau hir ac nid yw hynny'n cael ei gynnwys. Mae angen inni helpu'r bobl hyn, ac mae'n amlwg nad yw Llywodraeth y DU yn mynd i wneud hynny. Felly, a wnewch chi bwyso ar y Trysorlys am gyllid ychwanegol fel y gallwn helpu pobl yn y sefyllfaoedd hyn i sicrhau nad ydynt ar eu colled, nad ydynt mewn trafferthion a'n bod yn gallu helpu cyn gynted â phosibl?
English: Yes. Welsh Government has made available those support payments of up to £1,000 per household, and that's the same level of support that we were able to offer people affected by the extraordinary situation with the storms last March. But, you know, clearly, families and individuals affected are affected particularly badly. I do want to pay tribute to the work that Councillor Mike Harvey's been doing in terms of disseminating information to residents by his WhatsApp residents' group and also ensuring that people locally are having the kind of support and information that they need. But, yes, there's more to do with the UK Government on this particular agenda, both in terms of the immediate issues that we're facing, but that longer issue of coal tips and the mine works and the remediation that is necessary to prevent these kinds of things happening in future, which is why I hope that we can make some progress with the UK Government in this regard. In terms of support for local authorities, we are able, and we have been able, to meet the eligible local authority costs for this immediate response to the flooding during tier 3 and tier 4 by providing 100 per cent of the funding, and I think that that demonstrates the importance that we put on them as our local partners in terms of responding to these terrible events.
Welsh: Iawn. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi sicrhau bod taliadau cymorth o hyd at £1,000 yr aelwyd ar gael, a dyna'r un lefel o gymorth ag y gallem ei chynnig i bobl yr effeithiwyd arnynt gan y sefyllfa eithriadol yn sgil y stormydd fis Mawrth diwethaf. Ond wyddoch chi, yn amlwg, effeithir yn arbennig o wael ar deuluoedd ac unigolion yr effeithiwyd arnynt. Hoffwn dalu teyrnged i'r gwaith y mae'r Cynghorydd Mike Harvey wedi bod yn ei wneud yn lledaenu gwybodaeth i drigolion drwy ei grŵp trigolion WhatsApp a sicrhau hefyd fod pobl yn lleol yn cael y math o gymorth a gwybodaeth sydd eu hangen arnynt. Ond oes, mae mwy i'w wneud gyda Llywodraeth y DU ar yr agenda benodol hon, o ran y materion uniongyrchol rydym yn eu hwynebu, ond y mater mwy hirdymor ynglŷn â phyllau glo a'r safleoedd glofaol a'r gwaith adfer sy'n angenrheidiol i atal y mathau hyn o bethau rhag digwydd yn y dyfodol, a dyna pam rwy'n gobeithio y gallwn wneud rhywfaint o gynnydd gyda Llywodraeth y DU yn hyn o beth. O ran cymorth i awdurdodau lleol, rydym yn gallu, ac rydym wedi gallu, talu costau cymwys awdurdodau lleol ar yr ymateb uniongyrchol i'r llifogydd yn ystod haen 3 a haen 4 drwy ddarparu 100 y cant o'r cyllid, a chredaf fod hynny'n dangos eu pwysigrwydd i ni fel ein partneriaid lleol yn yr ymateb i'r digwyddiadau ofnadwy hyn.
English: Can I just associate myself with the remarks of David Rees with regard to how people have really stepped up to the plate in Skewen? Two weeks ago, on the back of his topical question, I asked the local government Minister a question that she didn't answer, but I think you might be able to - maybe you're better placed to do that. Obviously, with the Skewen floods, the focus was very much on the role of the Coal Authority property, but my question was wider, about the liability of landowners through whose land water runs - so, things like canals and other conduits; I'm not talking about water mains, but that kind of conduit. Some of the land's going to be publicly owned, either by local government, central Government or Natural Resources Wales, so can you tell us how public bodies are financed to meet the costs of liabilities incurred as the result of a failure of infrastructure on their land that leads to flood damage, either on their own land or third-party land, as we've seen in Skewen, and how is that reflected in the Welsh Government budget?
Welsh: A gaf fi ategu sylwadau David Rees ynglŷn â'r modd y mae pobl wedi ysgwyddo eu cyfrifoldebau yn Sgiwen? Bythefnos yn ôl, yn sgil ei gwestiwn amserol, gofynnais gwestiwn i'r Gweinidog llywodraeth leol, un na wnaeth mo'i ateb, ond credaf efallai y gallwch chi wneud hynny - efallai eich bod mewn gwell sefyllfa i wneud hynny. Yn amlwg, gyda llifogydd Sgiwen, roedd y ffocws yn fawr iawn ar rôl eiddo'r Awdurdod Glo, ond roedd fy nghwestiwn yn ehangach, ynglŷn ag atebolrwydd tirfeddianwyr y mae dŵr yn rhedeg drwy eu tir - felly, pethau fel camlesi a dyfrffosydd eraill; nid wyf yn sôn am y prif gyflenwad dŵr, ond y mathau hynny o ddyfrffosydd. Bydd peth o'r tiroedd mewn dwylo cyhoeddus, naill ai llywodraeth leol, Llywodraeth ganolog neu Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru, felly a allwch ddweud wrthym sut y caiff cyrff cyhoeddus eu hariannu i dalu costau rhwymedigaethau o ganlyniad i fethiant seilwaith ar eu tir sy'n arwain at ddifrod llifogydd, naill ai ar eu tir eu hunain neu ar dir trydydd parti, fel y gwelsom yn Sgiwen, a sut y caiff hynny ei adlewyrchu yng nghyllideb Llywodraeth Cymru?
English: Thank you for raising that particular issue. I will, if it's acceptable to Suzy Davies, seek some particular advice, because I think that some of those questions stray into legal areas that I might not be qualified to talk on this afternoon. So, in terms of the liabilities and so forth, I will provide a written update to Suzy Davies on liabilities.
Welsh: Diolch i chi am godi'r mater penodol hwnnw. Os yw'n dderbyniol gan Suzy Davies, fe wnaf ofyn am gyngor penodol, oherwydd credaf fod rhai o'r cwestiynau hynny'n crwydro i feysydd cyfreithiol nad wyf fi'n gymwys i siarad arnynt y prynhawn yma o bosibl. Felly, ar y rhwymedigaethau ac yn y blaen, fe wnaf ddarparu diweddariad ysgrifenedig i Suzy Davies ar rwymedigaethau.
English: I certainly agree that some sort of flooding victims guarantee in terms of financial support for the future is absolutely essential. We know that, in Skewen, the Coal Authority has given some sort of financial assistance, but only for external gardens - any changes that need to be made to the gardens, because of the impact - but that doesn't go anywhere close enough. So, anything additional would be welcome. But, recently, we all would have had a joint letter from the Secretary of State for Wales and the Welsh Government saying that there had been identified additional mine shafts here in Wales. I think 2,000 is the number now; it used to be 1,200. Now, this could be a ticking time bomb for other happenings across Wales that we simply do not know about at the moment. I wasn't reassured, from the reply to the letter, that we knew where they were and what was going to be done so that we can mitigate this from happening in the future. So, what are you going to do in terms of budgeting to ensure that we have the support necessary - although we don't want it to happen, it may happen again in the future - so that these victims can be supported through any experience that they may find themselves in?
Welsh: Rwy'n sicr yn cytuno ei bod hi'n hanfodol cael rhyw fath o warant dioddefwyr llifogydd mewn perthynas â chymorth ariannol ar gyfer y dyfodol. Gwyddom fod yr Awdurdod Glo, yn Sgiwen, wedi rhoi rhyw fath o gymorth ariannol, ond dim ond ar gyfer gerddi allanol - unrhyw newidiadau sydd angen eu gwneud i'r gerddi, oherwydd yr effaith - ond nid yw hynny'n mynd hanner digon pell. Felly, byddai unrhyw beth ychwanegol yn dderbyniol iawn. Ond yn ddiweddar, byddem i gyd wedi cael llythyr ar y cyd gan Ysgrifennydd Gwladol Cymru a Llywodraeth Cymru yn dweud bod siafftiau glofaol ychwanegol wedi'u canfod yma yng Nghymru. Rwy'n credu mai 2,000 yw'r nifer yn awr; arferai fod yn 1,200. Nawr, gallai fod yn fater o amser yn unig cyn y ceir digwyddiadau eraill ledled Cymru nad ydym yn gwybod amdanynt ar hyn o bryd. Ni thawelwyd fy meddwl, o'r ateb i'r llythyr, ein bod yn gwybod ble roeddent a beth oedd yn mynd i gael ei wneud fel y gallwn atal hyn rhag digwydd yn y dyfodol. Felly, beth y bwriadwch ei wneud o ran cyllidebu i sicrhau bod gennym y gefnogaeth angenrheidiol - er nad ydym am iddo ddigwydd, efallai y bydd yn digwydd eto yn y dyfodol - fel y gellir cefnogi'r dioddefwyr hyn drwy unrhyw brofiad y gallent ei wynebu?
English: Well, we've been having some discussions with the UK Government, which originated with the discussions about flooding, but then, obviously, became larger and took on the discussions relating to coal tips, and now, of course, that's extended again into the mine works. We know that the remediation of coal tips will require a piece of work over - probably a 10-year programme of work. And we're probably, I think, at this stage - and it's very hard to say exactly, but we are talking £500 million of work that would be needed over a long period of time. So, this is a major piece of work. And when we bring the mine works into this as well, I think that we are talking about some extremely serious funding that will be required to address what are, as you've set out, really important issues that can't be ignored. And this is why we're trying to make the case to the UK Government that we should be able to access additional funding, because Wales is disproportionately impacted. With coal tips, for example, we have 40 per cent of the whole of the UK's coal tips in Wales, so this isn't a Barnett consequential kind of situation. But we are continuing to try and make that case for a joint piece of work between the UK Government and Welsh Government. We realise that we have a major part to play in this as well, but I think that it does have to be a genuinely collaborative response to what is a serious matter.
Welsh: Wel, rydym wedi bod yn cael rhai trafodaethau gyda Llywodraeth y DU, a ddeilliodd o'r trafodaethau am lifogydd, ond wedyn, yn amlwg, daeth yn fwy o beth ac fe wnaethom gynnwys y trafodaethau'n ymwneud â phyllau glo, ac yn awr, wrth gwrs, mae hynny wedi'i ymestyn eto i gynnwys safleoedd glofaol. Gwyddom y bydd gwaith adfer pyllau glo yn galw am waith dros - rhaglen waith 10 mlynedd mae'n debyg. Ac mae'n debyg ein bod ni, rwy'n meddwl, ar hyn o bryd - ac mae'n anodd iawn dweud yn union, ond rydym yn sôn am werth £500 miliwn o waith y byddai ei angen dros gyfnod hir o amser. Felly, mae hwn yn waith mawr. A phan fyddwn yn cynnwys safleoedd glofaol yn hyn hefyd, credaf ein bod yn sôn am gyllid eithriadol o ddifrifol y bydd ei angen i fynd i'r afael â materion sydd, fel rydych wedi nodi, yn rhai gwirioneddol bwysig na ellir eu hanwybyddu. A dyma pam ein bod yn ceisio dadlau'r achos wrth Lywodraeth y DU y dylem allu cael cyllid ychwanegol, oherwydd mae Cymru'n cael ei heffeithio'n anghymesur. Gyda phyllau glo, er enghraifft, mae gennym 40 y cant o holl byllau glo'r DU yng Nghymru, felly nid math o sefyllfa arian canlyniadol Barnett yw hon. Ond rydym yn parhau i geisio dadlau'r achos dros waith ar y cyd rhwng Llywodraeth y DU a Llywodraeth Cymru. Sylweddolwn fod gennym ran fawr i'w chwarae yn hyn hefyd, ond credaf fod yn rhaid iddo fod yn ymateb gwirioneddol gydweithredol i fater difrifol.
English: Yes. With significant ongoing uncertainty about the path of the pandemic, we remain focused on providing the right funding at the right time. In 2020-21, we have already allocated more than £4 billion, including nearly £2 billion to support businesses, with further significant allocations in our third supplementary budget this month.
Welsh: Gwnaf. Gydag ansicrwydd sylweddol parhaus ynghylch llwybr y pandemig, rydym yn parhau i ganolbwyntio ar ddarparu'r cyllid cywir ar yr adeg iawn. Yn 2020-21, rydym eisoes wedi dyrannu mwy na £4 biliwn, gan gynnwys bron i £2 biliwn i gefnogi busnesau, gyda dyraniadau sylweddol pellach yn ein trydedd gyllideb atodol y mis hwn.
English: Thank you for that answer, Minister. Clearly, the UK Government has access to far greater finances than does the Welsh Government, and it will be very necessary to have those finances to help us recover from the coronavirus. So, can you tell us what discussions you have had or are planning to have with UK Government to support the rebuild of Welsh finances?
Welsh: Diolch i chi am eich ateb, Weinidog. Yn amlwg, mae gan Lywodraeth y DU fynediad at lawer mwy o arian na Llywodraeth Cymru, a bydd gwir angen cael yr arian hwnnw i'n helpu i ymadfer wedi'r coronafeirws. Felly, a allwch chi ddweud wrthym ba drafodaethau a gawsoch neu y bwriadwch eu cael gyda Llywodraeth y DU i gefnogi'r gwaith o ailadeiladu cyllid Cymru?
English: So, I'll be looking very carefully at what will be said at the UK Government's budget on 3 March in terms of what it might say in terms of providing support for a recovery effort and the reconstruction of the economy. I'm particularly keen to see what they have to say in terms of capital, because, of course, when we look at what the Chancellor said back in March, we were expecting to be receiving around £400 million of additional capital funding in next year's budget, and that would have been really something that we could use to motor forward with the reconstruction work, with the kind of infrastructure projects that will be necessary for the reconstruction effort. But, in the event, we actually received a cut to our capital budget, which was very unexpected. So, I'm wondering if the Chancellor might be taking the opportunity to announce additional funding in March. That's what I would hope to see. And then Welsh Government would obviously want to put in place those projects that actually we've had the opportunity to discuss right at the start of questions today with the spokesperson for Plaid Cymru, in terms of the infrastructure projects that we have in the pipeline. So, I think that would be one area where I would like to see much more action from the UK Government, and some more clarity in terms of funding for the future years.
Welsh: Byddaf yn edrych yn ofalus iawn ar yr hyn a ddywedir yng nghyllideb Llywodraeth y DU ar 3 Mawrth o ran yr hyn y gallai ei ddweud ynglŷn â darparu cymorth ar gyfer yr ymdrech adfer ac ailadeiladu'r economi. Rwy'n arbennig o awyddus i weld beth sydd ganddynt i'w ddweud am gyfalaf, oherwydd, wrth gwrs, pan edrychwn ar yr hyn a ddywedodd y Canghellor yn ôl ym mis Mawrth, roeddem yn disgwyl cael tua £400 miliwn o gyllid cyfalaf ychwanegol yng nghyllideb y flwyddyn nesaf, a byddai hynny wedi bod yn rhywbeth y gallem ei ddefnyddio i symud ymlaen gyda'r gwaith ailadeiladu, gyda'r math o brosiectau seilwaith a fydd yn angenrheidiol ar gyfer yr ymdrech ailadeiladu. Ond fel y digwyddodd, cawsom doriad i'n cyllideb cyfalaf, ac roedd hynny'n annisgwyl iawn. Felly, rwy'n meddwl tybed a fydd y Canghellor yn manteisio ar y cyfle i gyhoeddi cyllid ychwanegol ym mis Mawrth. Dyna beth fyddwn i'n gobeithio ei weld. Ac yna byddai Llywodraeth Cymru yn amlwg am weithredu'r prosiectau y cawsom gyfle i'w trafod ar ddechrau'r sesiwn gwestiynau heddiw gyda llefarydd Plaid Cymru, ynghylch y prosiectau seilwaith sydd gennym yn yr arfaeth. Felly, credaf y byddai hwnnw'n un maes lle hoffwn weld llawer mwy o weithredu gan Lywodraeth y DU, a mwy o eglurder ynglŷn â'r cyllid ar gyfer y blynyddoedd i ddod.
English: I've heard your response, Minister, to David Rowlands, but, of course, it's a matter for the Welsh Government how the Welsh Government cuts its cloth in terms of the funding from central Government. Now, I am concerned that, in the budget for national transport, infrastructure has gone from £150 million this year to £129 million in the next financial year. There are certainly long-term infrastructure projects and upgrades that are required across Wales, and so I'm just trying to understand why that is the case, why this budget has been significantly cut.
Welsh: Clywais eich ymateb i David Rowlands, Weinidog, ond wrth gwrs, mater i Lywodraeth Cymru yw sut y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn dyrannu ei chyllid o'r Llywodraeth ganolog. Nawr, rwy'n pryderu bod seilwaith, yn y gyllideb ar gyfer trafnidiaeth genedlaethol, wedi mynd o £150 miliwn eleni i £129 miliwn yn y flwyddyn ariannol nesaf. Yn sicr, mae angen prosiectau seilwaith hirdymor ac uwchraddio ledled Cymru, ac felly rwy'n ceisio deall pam y mae hynny wedi digwydd, pam y mae'r gyllideb hon wedi'i thorri'n sylweddol.