English: No, sorry, Llyr, I won't. The demand for grammar schools in those few pockets where they still exist has skyrocketed. So, we are not looking at what people want again, we're looking at imposing something that they may not want. Unfortunately, those grammar schools only exist in the wealthier parts of southern England and, together with rising house prices, this has seen fewer and fewer pupils from poorer backgrounds attending grammar schools. This has been seized upon and taken as evidence that grammar schools limit social mobility and should therefore be opposed. Excellent education shouldn't be the proviso of the rich - those who can afford to pay for private education or move to an area with excellent schools. Excellent education should be available to all and should challenge our brightest children as well. Excellent education is the true path to social mobility. This is what the UKIP motion before you today proposes. We want to see the reintroduction of grammar schools in Wales to produce an education system that provides the best opportunities for children of all abilities and from all backgrounds. Why should children from poorer backgrounds be denied a first-class education? Why should children who are not academically gifted be denied a top-class education, which is focused on technical and vocational subjects? And why should politics continue to hamper our children's future? If we were really committed to removing privilege, we would have abolished private education rather than waging a war on grammar schools. But, given that many politicians went to private school, this was never going to happen. Grammar schools will offer parents a choice: a choice to send their children to a school that offers an education on a par with that of the private sector; a choice to send their children to a school that will challenge them and maximise their potential; and a choice to send their children to a school that doesn't care about their social background, but offers them social mobility. I urge Members to support our motion, but I would like to say I am not a person who went to a grammar school. I failed the 11-plus, but it doesn't hold you back, because you go to a secondary modern school and then there's something in between that I went to: Y Pant School. It offered me the same opportunities as a grammar school, educationally. If you really want to pursue education, you can bring that to the attention of teachers. But on coming out of teacher training college, it was extremely disheartening to see that, all of a sudden, you didn't know who pupils were - you had a photograph in front of you to remind you of them. That's not conducive to learning. That's not conducive to the vulnerable in society -
Welsh: Na, mae'n ddrwg gennyf, Llyr, ni wnaf. Mae'r galw am ysgolion gramadeg yn yr ychydig bocedi lle maent yn dal i fodoli wedi saethu i'r entrychion. Felly, unwaith eto, nid ydym yn edrych ar yr hyn y mae pobl ei eisiau, rydym yn edrych ar orfodi rhywbeth nad ydynt ei eisiau o bosibl. Yn anffodus, nid yw'r ysgolion gramadeg hyn ond yn bodoli yn y rhannau cyfoethocach o dde Lloegr ac yn ogystal â phrisiau tai yn codi, mae hynny wedi golygu bod llai a llai o ddisgyblion o gefndiroedd tlotach yn mynychu ysgolion gramadeg. Bachwyd ar hyn ac fe'i hystyriwyd yn dystiolaeth fod ysgolion gramadeg yn cyfyngu ar symudedd cymdeithasol ac felly y dylid ei wrthwynebu. Ni ddylid cyfyngu addysg ragorol i'r cyfoethog yn unig - y rhai sy'n gallu fforddio talu am addysg breifat neu symud i ardal gydag ysgolion rhagorol. Dylai addysg ragorol fod ar gael i bawb a dylai herio ein plant mwyaf disglair yn ogystal. Addysg ragorol yw'r llwybr go iawn at symudedd cymdeithasol. Dyma beth y mae cynnig UKIP ger eich bron heddiw yn ei argymell. Rydym am weld ysgolion gramadeg yn cael eu hailgyflwyno yng Nghymru i gynhyrchu system addysg sy'n cynnig y cyfleoedd gorau i blant o bob gallu ac o bob cefndir. Pam y dylai plant o gefndiroedd tlotach gael eu hamddifadu o addysg o'r radd flaenaf? Pam y dylai plant nad ydynt yn alluog yn academaidd gael eu hamddifadu o addysg o'r radd flaenaf, sy'n canolbwyntio ar bynciau technegol a galwedigaethol? A pham y dylai gwleidyddiaeth barhau i lesteirio dyfodol ein plant? Pe baem yn gwbl ymrwymedig i gael gwared ar fraint, byddem wedi diddymu addysg breifat yn hytrach na mynd i ryfel yn erbyn ysgolion gramadeg. Ond o gofio bod llawer o wleidyddion wedi bod mewn ysgol breifat, nid oedd hynny byth yn mynd i ddigwydd. Bydd ysgolion gramadeg yn cynnig dewis i rieni: dewis i anfon eu plant i ysgol sy'n cynnig addysg gyfartal i'r hyn a geir yn y sector preifat; dewis i anfon eu plant i ysgol a fydd yn eu herio ac yn hyrwyddo'u potensial i'r eithaf; a dewis i anfon eu plant i ysgol nad yw'n poeni am eu cefndir cymdeithasol, ond sy'n cynnig symudedd cymdeithasol iddynt. Anogaf yr Aelodau i gefnogi ein cynnig, ond hoffwn ddweud nad wyf i'n berson a aeth i ysgol ramadeg. Methais yr '11-plus', ond nid yw'n eich dal yn ôl, am eich bod yn mynd i ysgol uwchradd fodern a rhywbeth yn y canol a fynychais i: Ysgol y Pant. Roedd yn cynnig yr un cyfleoedd i mi ag ysgol ramadeg, yn addysgol. Os ydych o ddifrif eisiau mynd ar drywydd addysg, gallwch ddod â hynny i sylw'r athrawon. Ond wrth ddod allan o goleg hyfforddi athrawon, digalon iawn oedd gweld yn sydyn nad oeddech yn gwybod pwy oedd y disgyblion - roedd gennych lun o'ch blaen i'ch atgoffa pwy oeddent. Nid yw hynny'n ffafrio dysgu. Nid yw hynny'n ffafrio'r bregus mewn cymdeithas -