English: Thank you for the questions and comments, and I think it's important - it's the point you were making, Joyce Watson, about making sure this is genuinely across health and social care. And it's interesting that we've worked together with the WLGA and voices across local government about the proposal, including the new citizen voice body, where, of course, there are elected representatives who do take up matters within local government for their constituents, and understanding how they'll work alongside each other in genuinely listening to and engaging with the voice of the citizen. But the duties imposed to supply information to the new citizen voice body, as I say, extend across health and local government. So, we're genuinely and deliberately drawing together the two sectors in the way that we're drawing together care across those two sectors as well. It's worth also pointing out that the national board of the community health council have been broadly positive about the Bill that we're bringing. So, perhaps some members in this room who have been more critical should look at the way in which we have genuinely worked in advance of the statement, the way in which there will be conversations that are ongoing between officials in my department and the board of the community health council to make sure we do get the legislation right to meet the shared purpose we have, and that does include clarity between the role of inspectorates and the role of the citizen voice body. I don't think there is a desire within the community health council movement to have that sort of deliberate fuzzy overlap between inspectorates and community health councils. There's an opportunity to get that right not just within the legislation but within the guidance and what will understandably be built on in terms of the memorandum of understanding that already exists between community health councils and our inspectorates now. But I think it's an important point that Joyce Watson made about the impact between litigation and the duty of candour, and the engagement of the duty of candour does not equal an admission of negligence. It's an acknowledgement that there is a need to have an open conversation with the citizen about what has happened in healthcare, and more than minimal harm can be caused in the normal risks that we all know take place within the delivery of health and care - but to be open about the fact that something has happened as opposed to saying, 'I can't talk to you because I'm worried that you'll go to a lawyer.' That's part of the challenge we have in a more closed culture that is more defensive. This is deliberately part of engagement to have a much more open culture that's focused on improvements, so candour and quality have to be seen together, and I hope that, as Members go through scrutiny, they'll see that it's not just an honest attempt, but, broadly, we've got the approach in the right place to deliver that in reality.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiynau a'r sylwadau, a chredaf ei bod hi'n bwysig - dyna'r pwynt yr oeddech chi'n ei wneud, Joyce Watson, ynglŷn â sicrhau bod hyn yn wir ym mhob rhan o iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol. Ac mae'n ddiddorol ein bod ni wedi cydweithio â'r CLlLC a lleisiau ar draws Llywodraeth Leol ynglŷn â'r cynnig, gan gynnwys y corff newydd i glywed llais y dinesydd, lle ceir cynrychiolwyr etholedig, wrth gwrs, sy'n codi materion o fewn Llywodraeth Leol ar ran eu hetholwyr, a deall sut y byddan nhw'n gweithio gyda'i gilydd i wrando ar lais dinasyddion ac ymgysylltu â nhw. Ond mae'r dyletswyddau a bennwyd i ddod â gwybodaeth gerbron y corff newydd i glywed llais y dinesydd, fel y dywedaf, yn ymestyn ar draws iechyd a llywodraeth leol. Felly, rydym ni'n tynnu, yn wirioneddol ac yn fwriadol, y ddau sector ynghyd yn y ffordd yr ydym ni'n tynnu gofal ynghyd ar draws y ddau sector hynny hefyd. Mae'n werth nodi hefyd y bu gan fwrdd cenedlaethol y cyngor iechyd cymuned agwedd gadarnhaol ar y cyfan ynglŷn â'r Bil yr ydym yn ei gyflwyno. Felly, efallai y dylai rhai Aelodau yn yr ystafell hon sydd wedi bod yn fwy beirniadol, edrych ar y ffordd yr ydym ni wedi gweithio o ddifrif cyn gwneud y datganiad, y ffordd y bydd sgyrsiau parhaus rhwng swyddogion yn fy adran i a bwrdd y cyngor iechyd cymuned i sicrhau bod y ddeddfwriaeth yn addas i gyflawni'r amcan yr ydym ni'n ei rannu, ac mae hynny'n cynnwys eglurder rhwng swyddogaeth arolygiaethau a swyddogaeth y corff i glywed llais y dinesydd. Nid wyf i'n credu bod awydd o fewn mudiad y cynghorau iechyd cymuned i gael y math hwnnw o orgyffwrdd annelwig rhwng arolygiaethau a chynghorau iechyd cymuned. Mae cyfle i gael hynny'n iawn nid yn unig o fewn y ddeddfwriaeth ond o fewn y canllawiau a'r hyn y bydd yn naturiol i ni adeiladu arno o ran y memorandwm o ddealltwriaeth sydd eisoes yn bodoli rhwng cynghorau iechyd cymuned a'n harolygiaethau ni erbyn hyn. Ond rwy'n credu bod y pwynt a wnaeth Joyce Watson yn un pwysig ynglŷn â'r effaith rhwng ymgyfreitha a'r ddyletswydd o ddidwylledd, ac nid yw ymgysylltiad â'r ddyletswydd o ddidwylledd yn gyfystyr â chyfaddefiad o esgeulustod. Cydnabyddiaeth yw hyn bod angen am sgwrs agored gyda'r dinesydd am yr hyn sydd wedi digwydd ym maes gofal iechyd, ac fe all mwy nag ychydig o niwed gael ei achosi yn y risgiau arferol yr ydym ni i gyd yn gwybod sy'n digwydd wrth ddarparu iechyd a gofal - ond bod yn agored o ran y ffaith bod rhywbeth wedi digwydd yn hytrach na dweud, 'Ni allaf i siarad â chi am fy mod i'n pryderu y byddwch chi'n mynd at gyfreithiwr.' Mae hynny'n rhan o'r her sydd gennym ni mewn diwylliant mwy caeedig sy'n fwy amddiffynnol. Mae hyn yn fwriadol yn rhan o'r ymgysylltu ar gyfer bod â diwylliant llawer mwy agored sy'n canolbwyntio ar welliannau, felly mae'n rhaid gweld didwylledd ac ansawdd gyda'i gilydd, ac rwy'n gobeithio, wrth i'r Aelodau fynd drwy'r broses graffu, y byddan nhw'n gweld nad ymdrech onest yn unig yw hon, ond, yn gyffredinol, bod yr ymagwedd yn y lle iawn gennym ni i gyflawni hynny mewn gwirionedd.