English: Well, the SNP in Scotland, if we take that first, of course, has its own mandate, and it's a genuine mandate that comes from the people of Scotland as a result of the recent Scottish Parliament election. You will also know that, of course, where there have been common interests between Welsh Governments and Scottish Governments, there has been very close collaboration on a whole variety of constitutional issues. I have met on a number of occasions with my counterparts in the Scottish Government to talk about some of these issues, and, where there is common ground, we will work collectively to achieve the objectives that we have in terms of the benefit of the people of Wales, as they will do within Scotland as well. I think, in terms of the regional mayors and so on - I think it is very important that there are discussions with those. Those are forms of devolved government; a very different and perhaps a very ad hoc form of devolved government - very different I think to what Kilbrandon, in the 1974 report, actually envisaged, and therein lies perhaps the nub of a much deeper problem as to why we are where we are now. But, as I said in my last answer, I think within Wales what we have to do is to engage and to be clear about where the consensus lies in Wales for change, to build on that consensus and to engage with all those others who would share a common interest in the constitutional reform. As I've said, I think constitutional reform is an inevitability. Unfortunately, there are consequences - there are adverse consequences, if it is not dealt with in a progressive and in a cohesive way. And the most disappointing feature about it at the moment was, in the publication of the reform in the UK Government - is that the UK Government appears to have buried its head in the sand on the issues that really are facing us all at the moment.
Welsh: Wel, mae gan yr SNP yn yr Alban, os cymerwn hynny'n gyntaf, wrth gwrs, ei fandad ei hun, ac mae'n fandad go iawn gan bobl yr Alban o ganlyniad i etholiad diweddar Senedd yr Alban. Hefyd, lle bu buddiannau cyffredin gan Lywodraeth Cymru a Llywodraeth yr Alban, fe wyddoch wrth gwrs y bu cydweithio agos iawn ar amrywiaeth eang o faterion cyfansoddiadol. Rwyf wedi cyfarfod droeon â chymheiriaid yn Llywodraeth yr Alban i siarad am rai o'r materion hyn, a lle ceir tir cyffredin, byddwn yn gweithio gyda'n gilydd i gyflawni'r amcanion sydd gennym o ran y budd i bobl Cymru, fel y gwnânt yn yr Alban hefyd. Ar fater y meiri rhanbarthol ac yn y blaen - credaf ei bod yn bwysig iawn cael trafodaethau gyda'r rheini. Mae'r rheini'n ffurfiau ar lywodraeth ddatganoledig; ffurf wahanol iawn a ffurf ad hoc iawn efallai ar lywodraeth ddatganoledig - gwahanol iawn i'r hyn a ragwelwyd gan Kilbrandon yn yr adroddiad yn 1974, a dyna graidd problem lawer dyfnach o ran pam ein bod yn y sefyllfa rydym ynddi yn awr. Ond fel y dywedais yn fy ateb diwethaf, credaf mai'r hyn sy'n rhaid inni ei wneud yng Nghymru yw ymgysylltu a bod yn glir ynglŷn â ble mae'r consensws yng Nghymru ar gyfer newid, adeiladu ar y consensws hwnnw ac ymgysylltu â'r holl bobl eraill a fyddai'n rhannu diddordeb cyffredin mewn diwygio cyfansoddiadol o'r fath. Fel y dywedais, rwy'n credu bod diwygio cyfansoddiadol yn anochel. Yn anffodus, mae canlyniadau - mae canlyniadau andwyol, os nad ymdrinnir â hyn mewn ffordd flaengar ac mewn ffordd gydlynol. A'r nodwedd fwyaf siomedig yn awr, wrth gyhoeddi'r diwygio yn Llywodraeth y DU - yw ei bod yn ymddangos bod Llywodraeth y DU wedi claddu ei phen yn y tywod ar y materion gwirioneddol sy'n ein hwynebu ni i gyd ar hyn o bryd.