English: I thank the Member for his questions this afternoon. It would be fair to say that, while the reviewers took quite a significant amount of time to make sure that we cover all ground, and the CPR is the final element of that reporting structure, it would also be fair to say that my team, and the Government previously, was already working on opportunities to improve the system. The social care and well-being programme has already improved that procedure, since this terrible event happened, so the duty to report, the training and guidance for authorities and individuals are rolling out. And, as I said in my statement, the importance of now looking at the family unit, as opposed to an individual who may be under some sort of scrutiny or reporting, is an important change in the way that we operate. This is always going to be challenging, in terms of the burden of proof, and I listened very carefully to the Member. I am minded, though, on the basis that I would rather protect an individual, to take some risk in that process, rather than erring on the very strong lobbies, on both sides, about the rights of the child or the rights of the parent. But, to me, the vulnerable person has to come out on top here, and maybe, as a Government, we have to be much more robust in our approach to that - giving powers to individuals who fear there is some risk, without evidence always, but there may be that gut feeling that there's something not quite right. We need to be able to support individuals in that process. The Member's right about the resourcing of that, and that's why it's really important, from this CPR, that I work with my colleagues across Cabinet, to fully understand - the home-education element is just one part of this particular case, but there are many other young people, I would suggest, who don't access a system around healthcare or education, so people who opt out of education until the age of three, and may be in a similar situation, where we just don't have a contact process. But I do think what we have to do as a Government is look collectively around an individual, think about how we're going to operate trigger points, what the opportunities are there for us to understand that somebody is safe. And that's what this question is about. There are many people, in many circumstances, in very, very good families. But, in this case, we have to question our failure as a system not to have the contact, and the ability to contact, individuals in this very process. In terms of home schooling, I've already met with the Minister responsible for that decision, and we are, again, looking at the whole principle of well-being, about how that will look, and I'll continue those discussions. I had a team meeting today, across the departments, to start looking about what we are going to do about this particular case, and what the lessons learnt will be, and how we will interpret them, in terms of legislation or otherwise, if we need to do that. The Member is quite right to recognise also the unregulated issues around health and seeking medicines that actually aren't regulated. That does concern me. But I think what I'd like to do is come back to the Chamber once we've had more of a collective discussion around our opportunities for success around the safeguarding. And, as I said, we have put many in place. There are still constant things that we can learn, and we should learn from these case reviews all the time, and it's something that I'm very keen to do.
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Aelod am ei gwestiynau y prynhawn yma. Byddai'n deg dweud, er bod yr adolygwyr wedi cymryd cryn dipyn o amser i sicrhau ein bod wedi ymdrin â phopeth, a'r adolygiad ymarfer plant yw'r elfen olaf o'r adeiledd adrodd hwnnw, byddai hefyd yn deg dweud bod fy nhîm, a'r Llywodraeth yn flaenorol, eisoes yn gweithio ar gyfleoedd i wella'r system. Mae'r rhaglen gofal cymdeithasol a lles eisoes wedi gwella'r weithdrefn honno, ers y digwyddiad ofnadwy hwn, felly mae'r ddyletswydd i hysbysu, yr hyfforddiant a'r canllawiau i awdurdodau ac unigolion yn cael eu cyflwyno. Ac, fel y dywedais yn fy natganiad, mae pwysigrwydd edrych ar yr uned deuluol, yn hytrach nag unigolyn a all fod yn destun rhyw fath o graffu neu adroddiad, yn newid pwysig i'r ffordd yr ydym ni'n gweithredu. Bydd hyn bob amser yn anodd, o ran baich y profi, a gwrandewais yn astud iawn ar yr Aelod. Rwy'n meddwl, fodd bynnag, ar y sail y byddai'n well gennyf amddiffyn unigolyn, y dylid cymryd rhywfaint o risg yn y broses honno, yn hytrach na dibynnu ar y lobïau cryf iawn, ar y ddwy ochr, ynghylch hawliau'r plentyn neu hawliau'r rhiant. Ond, i mi, mae'n rhaid i'r unigolyn agored i niwed fod bennaf yma, ac efallai, fel Llywodraeth, bod rhaid i ni fod yn llawer mwy cadarn yn ein hymagwedd at hynny - rhoi pwerau i unigolion sy'n ofni bod rhywfaint o risg, heb dystiolaeth bob amser, ond efallai y bydd eu greddf yn dweud bod rhywbeth o'i le. Mae angen i ni allu cefnogi unigolion yn y broses honno. Mae'r Aelod yn iawn am adnoddau ar gyfer hynny, a dyna pam mae'n bwysig iawn, o'r adolygiad ymarfer plant hwn, fy mod i'n gweithio gyda'm cydweithwyr ar draws y Cabinet, er mwyn deall yn llawn - dim ond un rhan o'r achos penodol hon yw'r elfen addysg gartref, ond ceir llawer o bobl ifanc eraill, byddwn yn awgrymu, nad ydynt yn cael mynediad at system o amgylch gofal iechyd neu addysg, felly pobl sy'n optio allan o addysg hyd at dair oed, ac a allai fod mewn sefyllfa debyg, lle nad oes gennym ni broses gyswllt. Ond rwy'n meddwl mai'r hyn y mae'n rhaid i ni ei wneud fel Llywodraeth yw edrych ar y cyd o gwmpas unigolyn, meddwl am sut yr ydym ni'n mynd i weithredu pwyntiau sbardun, pa gyfleoedd sydd yno i ni i ddeall bod rhywun yn ddiogel. A dyna yw diben y cwestiwn hwn. Ceir llawer o bobl, mewn llawer o amgylchiadau, mewn teuluoedd da iawn, iawn. Ond, yn yr achos hwn, mae'n rhaid i ni gwestiynu ein methiant fel system i beidio â chael y cyswllt, a'r gallu i gysylltu, ag unigolion yn yr union broses hon. O ran addysg gartref, rwyf eisoes wedi cyfarfod â'r Gweinidog sy'n gyfrifol am y penderfyniad hwnnw, ac rydym ni, unwaith eto, yn edrych ar holl egwyddor o les, o ran sut y bydd hynny'n edrych, a byddaf yn parhau â'r trafodaethau hynny. Cefais gyfarfod tîm heddiw, ar draws yr adrannau, i ddechrau ystyried yr hyn yr ydym ni'n mynd i'w wneud ynghylch yr achos penodol hwn, a pha wersi y byddwn yn eu dysgu, a sut y byddwn yn eu dehongli, o ran deddfwriaeth neu fel arall, os bydd angen i ni wneud hynny. Mae'r Aelod yn hollol iawn i gydnabod hefyd y materion heb eu rheoleiddio sy'n ymwneud ag iechyd a cheisio meddyginiaethau nad ydynt wedi'u rheoleiddio. Mae hynny'n peri pryder i mi. Ond rwy'n meddwl mai'r hyn yr hoffwn ei wneud yw dod yn ôl i'r Siambr ar ôl i ni gael mwy o gyd-drafodaeth ar ein cyfleoedd o sicrhau llwyddiant o ran diogelu. Ac, fel y dywedais, rydym ni wedi rhoi llawer o bethau ar waith. Ceir pethau cyson y gallwn eu dysgu o hyd, a dylem ddysgu o'r adolygiadau achos hyn drwy'r amser, ac mae'n rhywbeth yr wyf yn awyddus iawn i'w wneud.