English: Well, starting with the last one there, I very much welcome John Griffiths's comments and I agree with him entirely that it's very much in the same space as the committee report, which is really pleasing - that we are able to take it forward together. Going backwards, some of the things that he raises, rightly, are things that we will need to respond to in the round in the report overall. I think the issue around invasive fire-risk assessments, which I think David Melding has raised on a number of occasions and which the committee certainly looked at, will be something we look at in the round in the process that the road map sets out. It's quite comprehensive, the process that's set out, with some stops in it for checks, and so on, so we will be looking to see what can be done with that. And it has the phases in it. So, it's got the new build - how you put the building regulations in place for a new build - but it's also got the occupancy phase recommendations in it, and I'm very keen to look carefully at the occupancy phase: what should be undertaken by way of retrofit, but then what the ongoing inspection regime should be, as he said. Because actually, as the technology changes and as knowledge changes, it may well be that something comes up that's brilliant in three years' time that nobody in this room has yet thought of, and we want to be able to incorporate new fire safety things, digital things, perhaps, or whatever, into that assessment and not have to rely on legislation to bring them forward. So, it's partly that we want to think about the response and the way we bring forward the regulations to try to futureproof them as much as possible and to allow fire-risk assessments to look at best practice as it is right now as you do the assessment, so that each time the assessment is done, you're looking again, afresh, at best practice, so that if things have changed in the intervening years, actually you'd expect people to upgrade to that level, because I think that's the real issue. We would have to look to see what can be put in place to finance that. If we're going to do it through the private rented sector, for example, we will need to be able to understand the effects of the needed capital investment, or whatever it is, that might be required. We will need to carefully consider how the system balances the proportionality with making sure that people have the best fire safety. So, that's why I'm reluctant to answer right now, because we want to look at a lot of those issues in the round before we bring forward the proposals for both the regulations and for the kind of culture change, if you like, that goes with them.
Welsh: Wel, gan ddechrau gyda'r olaf, rwy'n croesawu sylwadau John Griffiths yn fawr ac yn cytuno ag ef yn llwyr fod y cyngor o'r un farn i raddau helaeth iawn ag adroddiad y pwyllgor, a braf iawn yw hynny - ein bod ni'n gallu symud ymlaen gyda'n gilydd. Gan weithio'n ôl, mae rhai o'r pethau y mae ef yn eu codi, yn wir, yn bethau y bydd angen inni ymateb iddyn nhw yn eu cyfanrwydd yn yr adroddiad yn gyffredinol. Rwy'n credu y bydd y mater ynglŷn ag asesiadau risg tân ymledol, y credaf fod David Melding wedi ei godi ar sawl achlysur ac yn sicr yr edrychodd y pwyllgor arno, yn rhywbeth y byddwn ni'n ei ystyried yn ei gyfanrwydd yn y broses y mae'r cyngor yn ei nodi. Mae'n gynhwysfawr iawn, y broses a nodir, gyda rhai arosfannau ynddo ar gyfer archwiliadau, ac yn y blaen, felly byddwn yn edrych i weld beth ellir ei wneud ynglŷn â hynny. A cheir cyfnodau ynddo. Felly, mae adeiladau newydd ynddo - sut mae rhoi rheoliadau adeiladu ar waith ar gyfer adeiladau newydd - ond hefyd mae'r argymhellion cyfnod meddiannaeth ynddo, ac rwy'n awyddus iawn i edrych yn ofalus ar y cyfnod meddiannaeth: yr hyn y dylid ei gyflawni drwy ôl-osod, ond yna'r hyn ddylai'r drefn archwilio barhaus fod, fel y dywedodd ef. Oherwydd mewn gwirionedd, wrth i'r dechnoleg newid a'r wybodaeth newid, mae'n bosib iawn y daw rhywbeth gwych i'r fei ymhen tair blynedd nad oes neb yn yr ystafell hon wedi meddwl amdano eto, ac rydym eisiau gallu ymgorffori pethau newydd o ran diogelwch tân, pethau digidol, efallai, neu beth bynnag, i'r asesiad hwnnw heb orfod dibynnu ar ddeddfwriaeth i'w cyflwyno nhw. Felly, mae'n ymwneud yn rhannol â'n bod ni am roi ystyriaeth i'r ymateb a'r ffordd y byddwn ni'n cyflwyno'r rheoliadau i geisio paratoi cymaint â phosib ar gyfer y dyfodol a chaniatáu i asesiadau risg tân edrych ar arfer gorau fel y mae nawr wrth wneud yr asesiad. Felly, bob tro y gwneir yr asesiad, rydych chi'n ystyried arfer gorau o'r newydd unwaith eto, ac os bydd pethau wedi newid yn y cyfamser, byddech chi'n disgwyl i bobl uwchraddio i'r lefel honno, oherwydd credaf mai dyna'r broblem mewn gwirionedd. Byddai'n rhaid inni edrych i weld yr hyn y gellir ei roi ar waith i ariannu hynny. Os ydym eisiau gwneud hynny drwy'r sector rhentu preifat, er enghraifft, bydd angen inni allu deall effeithiau'r buddsoddiad cyfalaf, neu beth bynnag, a allai fod yn ofynnol. Bydd angen inni ystyried yn ofalus sut mae'r system yn cydbwyso'r cymesuredd â sicrhau bod pobl yn cael y diogelwch tân gorau. Felly, dyna pam yr wyf yn amharod i ateb ar hyn o bryd, oherwydd rydym eisiau edrych ar lawer o'r materion hyn yn eu cyfanrwydd cyn y byddwn yn cyflwyno'r cynigion am y rheoliadau a hefyd am y math o newid diwylliant, os hoffech chi, sy'n mynd gyda nhw.