techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: So, if it's not being let out and it is classed as a small business, and what you're saying is, 'This is not being let out, it's being used as a second home', and the person has done that - that's a fraud. So, that's a criminal offence and would be prosecuted. We have asked - as a result of something Siân Gwenllian asked me to do - all authorities in Wales for any evidence of that, and we have not been provided with any. And we've asked the valuation office to conduct an audit of the ones that they're aware of, and they have not come up with a single one that hasn't legitimately changed across and hasn't been able to provide the evidence necessary to sustain that. Now, I'll say it again: if you've got evidence that that's happening, let's have it, and I'll do something about it. But so far, at this point in time, we have no - . We have anecdotes of all sorts, including in my own authority and everywhere else, but we have no actual evidence at all that that's actually happening.
Welsh: Felly, os nad yw'n cael ei osod a'i fod yn cael ei ddosbarthu fel busnes bach, yr hyn rydych yn ei ddweud yw, 'Nid yw hwn yn cael ei osod, mae'n cael ei ddefnyddio fel ail gartref', ac mae'r person wedi gwneud hynny - mae hynny'n dwyll. Felly, mae honno'n drosedd a byddai'r person yn cael ei erlyn. Rydym wedi gofyn - o ganlyniad i rywbeth y gofynnodd Siân Gwenllian i mi ei wneud - i'r holl awdurdodau yng Nghymru am unrhyw dystiolaeth o hynny, ac nid ydym wedi cael unrhyw dystiolaeth. Ac rydym wedi gofyn i'r swyddfa brisio gynnal archwiliad o'r rhai y maent yn ymwybodol ohonynt, ac nid ydynt wedi cyflwyno un sydd heb fod yn newid cyfreithlon ac nid ydynt wedi gallu darparu'r dystiolaeth angenrheidiol i gynnal hynny. Nawr, rwy'n dweud eto: os oes gennych dystiolaeth fod hynny'n digwydd, gadewch i ni ei gweld, a byddaf yn gwneud rhywbeth am y peth. Ond hyd yn hyn, ar hyn o bryd, nid oes gennym unrhyw - . Mae gennym anecdotau o bob math, gan gynnwys yn fy awdurdod i ac ym mhobman arall, ond nid oes gennym unrhyw dystiolaeth o gwbl fod hynny'n digwydd mewn gwirionedd.
English: I do recognise the concerns behind this question, but the boundaries between main home, second homes, multiple occupation properties and any business identity have become long blurred since the arrival of Airbnb and other similar daily-rate accommodation companies. If you support the principle of what Plaid thinks of as a second home - which is occupied only periodically by visitors who don't live there full time - being excluded from business registration, then how could you ever expect to collect any tourism tax from them? I think, actually, that's a really good reason for not even considering that tax any further.
Welsh: Rwy'n cydnabod y pryderon y tu ôl i'r cwestiwn hwn, ond mae'r ffiniau rhwng prif gartref, ail gartrefi, tai amlfeddiannaeth ac unrhyw endid busnes wedi bod yn niwlog ers dyfodiad Airbnb a chwmnïau llety cyfradd ddyddiol tebyg. Os ydych yn cefnogi egwyddor o atal yr hyn y mae Plaid Cymru yn ei ystyried yn ail gartref - nad yw ond wedi'i feddiannu o bryd i'w gilydd gan ymwelwyr nad ydynt yn byw yno yn barhaol - rhag cael ei gofrestru fel busnes, sut y gallech ddisgwyl casglu unrhyw dreth dwristiaeth ganddynt? Rwy'n credu bod hwnnw'n rheswm gwirioneddol dda dros beidio â hyd yn oed ystyried y dreth honno ymhellach.
English: So, I make the same point: if we have any evidence at all that properties have been incorrectly listed as businesses and not domestic properties, then let's have it, and we'll look at it and do something about it. If a residence is a domestic residence, listed as a domestic residence for occasional occupation, or never occupation - and there's nothing to stop you buying a second home and literally never going to it - as long as it's registered as a domestic premises, then it will pay whatever the relevant council tax for a non-main-home residence is in that area. You have to positively approach the valuation office and say that you want to register this property as a non-residential property for business use in order to get into this scheme. You have to have two or less of those properties to qualify as a small business and get the rate relief. If you have more than that, you'll be paying non-domestic rates on it instead of council tax, which is not necessarily better, it might be more. And then the other thing to say is, although the doubling of the charge for second homes in many areas of Wales was not intended in any way as a revenue-raising arrangement - but rather a behaviour modification arrangement - in fact, it's raised very considerable amounts of money across Wales. Far more than ever would have been lost if such a loophole had existed, which I emphasise it does not.
Welsh: Rwy'n gwneud yr un pwynt: os oes gennym unrhyw dystiolaeth o gwbl fod eiddo wedi cael eu rhestru'n anghywir fel busnesau yn hytrach nag eiddo domestig, gadewch i ni ei gweld, ac fe edrychwn arni a gwneud rhywbeth yn ei gylch. Os yw preswylfa'n breswylfa ddomestig, wedi'i rhestru'n breswylfa ddomestig ar gyfer meddiannaeth achlysurol, neu fel preswylfa na fydd byth yn cael ei meddiannu - ac nid oes unrhyw beth i'ch atal rhag prynu ail gartref heb fynd iddo byth - cyhyd â'i fod wedi'i gofrestru fel annedd ddomestig, bydd yn talu beth bynnag yw'r dreth gyngor berthnasol ar gyfer preswylfa nad yw'n brif gartref yn yr ardal honno. Mae'n rhaid i chi gysylltu â'r swyddfa brisio a dweud eich bod eisiau cofrestru'r eiddo yn eiddo dibreswyl at ddefnydd busnes er mwyn cael eich cynnwys yn y cynllun hwn. Ni allwch gael mwy na dau eiddo o'r fath i fod yn gymwys fel busnes bach a chael y rhyddhad ardrethi. Os oes gennych fwy na hynny, fe fyddwch yn talu ardrethi annomestig arno yn lle'r dreth gyngor, nad yw o reidrwydd yn well, efallai y bydd yn fwy. Wedyn y peth arall i'w ddweud yw, mewn perthynas â dyblu'r tâl am ail gartrefi mewn nifer o ardaloedd yng Nghymru, ni fwriadwyd iddo fod yn drefniant codi refeniw mewn unrhyw ffordd - ond yn hytrach yn drefniant i newid ymddygiad - ond mae wedi codi symiau sylweddol iawn o arian ledled Cymru mewn gwirionedd. Llawer mwy nag a fyddai wedi'i golli pe bai bwlch o'r fath wedi bodoli yn y gyfraith, ac rwy'n pwysleisio nad yw hynny'n wir.
English: Does the Minister share my frustration that it's not clear whether Plaid are complaining about fraud or are complaining about the law? Is the issue that second-home owners are reclassifying them as holiday homes but still living in them themselves part time and not renting them out? In which case that's fraud. Is it that they're not renting them out very much and they're not actually reaching the 10 weeks a year? In which case shall we have some more enforcement? Or is there an argument that, if they're to benefit from having this zero council tax in this way, they should actually be renting them out for longer than 10 weeks a year? In which case why don't we go to the HMRC definition of requiring furnished holiday lettings to be rented out for 15 weeks a year minimum, and available for 30 weeks a year minimum?
Welsh: A yw'r Gweinidog yn rhannu fy rhwystredigaeth nad yw'n glir a yw Plaid Cymru yn cwyno am dwyll neu'n cwyno am y gyfraith? Ai'r broblem yw bod perchenogion ail gartrefi'n eu hailddosbarthu fel cartrefi gwyliau ond yn dal i fyw ynddynt eu hunain yn rhan-amser yn hytrach na'u gosod ar rent? Os felly, twyll yw hynny. Ai'r broblem yw'r ffaith nad ydynt yn eu gosod ar rent yn aml ac felly nid ydynt yn cyrraedd y trothwy 10 wythnos y flwyddyn? Os felly, a ddylem gymryd camau pellach i orfodi'r gyfraith? Neu a oes dadl, os ydynt yn mynd i elwa o beidio â gorfod talu'r dreth gyngor yn y modd hwn, y dylent fod yn eu gosod ar rent am fwy na 10 wythnos y flwyddyn? Os felly, pam nad ydym yn troi at ddiffiniad Cyllid a Thollau ei Mawrhydi a'i gwneud yn ofynnol i gartrefi gwyliau â dodrefn gael eu gosod ar rent am 15 wythnos y flwyddyn o leiaf, ac ar gael am isafswm o 30 wythnos y flwyddyn?
English: That's a reasonable analysis. Our analysis from all of the work that we've done on this is that the amount of letting is the right level, because tourism economies are very important across Wales in very small places. So, this is a balance, isn't it, between allowing properties to be used in our very vital tourism industry, and making sure that people are not taking advantage of some loophole. But it's not a loophole if you have to evidence it in the right way. So, if you have evidence that people are not letting their accommodation out in the right way, then let us have it. I've said repeatedly in the Chamber, and I'll say it one more time: I am more than happy to look at any evidence at all that that is happening, but currently I don't have any.
Welsh: Mae hwnnw'n ddadansoddiad rhesymol. Ein dadansoddiad ni o'r holl waith rydym wedi'i wneud ar hyn yw bod hyd y cyfnod gosod ar y lefel gywir, oherwydd mae economïau twristiaeth yn bwysig iawn ledled Cymru mewn lleoedd bach iawn. Felly, mater o sicrhau cydbwysedd yw hyn rhwng caniatáu i eiddo gael ei ddefnyddio yn ein diwydiant twristiaeth hollbwysig, a sicrhau nad yw pobl yn manteisio ar ryw fwlch yn y gyfraith. Ond nid yw'n fwlch os oes rhaid i chi ddangos tystiolaeth ohono yn y ffordd iawn. Felly, os oes gennych dystiolaeth nad yw pobl yn gosod eu llety yn y ffordd gywir, gadewch inni ei gweld. Rwyf wedi dweud dro ar ôl tro yn y Siambr, ac rwyf am ei ddweud unwaith eto: rwy'n fwy na pharod i edrych ar unrhyw dystiolaeth o gwbl fod hynny'n digwydd, ond ar hyn o bryd nid oes gennyf dystiolaeth.
English: I recognise that price and availability of homes for local people in parts of Wales are being impacted by second-home ownership. To understand this impact in their areas, local authorities are required to conduct local housing market assessments and apply strategies to meet the requirements of their communities.
Welsh: Rwy'n cydnabod bod pris ac argaeledd cartrefi i bobl leol mewn rhannau o Gymru'n cael eu heffeithio gan berchnogaeth ar ail gartrefi. Er mwyn deall yr effaith hon yn eu hardaloedd, mae'n ofynnol i awdurdodau lleol gynnal asesiadau o'r farchnad dai leol a defnyddio strategaethau i fodloni gofynion eu cymunedau.
English: There are broader issues than just the impact within the taxation system. But we do need a resolution to that, and the WLGA agrees with us that changing section 66 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 is the way forward. So, it's not just on these benches that are talking about this; the WLGA, representing all Welsh councils, has also said that we need to amend that legislation as a matter of urgency. But you're not going to go down that route; I don't quite understand why. But there are broader issues, of course, aren't there? Of the homes sold in Gwynedd recently, 40 per cent of them were sold as second homes. Now, that is a huge figure, and that kind of social and economic change leaves our communities much, much worse off for most of the year. So, what general work has your Government done in order to take all of these issues into account? For example, is it now time for us to make it a requirement for anyone who wishes to convert a home into a second home - particularly in these areas where there are very high numbers of second homes - that they would need planning consent before they could make that change? There are other changes to the planning system that could be considered. Other areas - Cornwall and the Lake District have tackled this.
Welsh: Mae yna faterion ehangach na'r sgil effaith yma sydd yn digwydd yn y system dreth, wrth gwrs. Ond mae angen datrys hwnnw, ac mae Cymdeithas Llywodraeth Leol Cymru yn cytuno efo ni mai addasu adran 66 o Ddeddf Cyllid Llywodraeth Leol 1992 ydy'r ffordd ymlaen. Felly, dim jest ni ar y meinciau yma sydd yn sôn am hyn; mae'r gymdeithas llywodraeth leol, sy'n cynrychioli holl gynghorau Cymru, yn dweud bod angen addasu adran 66 ar fyrder. Ond dydych chi ddim am fynd lawr y llwybr yna; dwi ddim cweit yn deall pam. Ond mae yna faterion ehangach, wrth gwrs, onid oes? O'r tai a gafodd eu gwerthu yng Ngwynedd yn ddiweddar, roedd 40 y cant ohonyn nhw yn cael eu gwerthu fel ail gartrefi. Rŵan, mae hwnna'n ffigur anferth ac mae'r math yna o newid cymdeithasol ac economaidd yn gadael ein cymunedau ni yn leoedd llwm iawn, iawn y rhan fwyaf o adeg y flwyddyn. Felly, pa waith cyffredinol mae'ch Llywodraeth chi wedi'i wneud i ystyried hyn i gyd? Er enghraifft, ydy hi wedi dod yn amser rŵan i ni ei gwneud hi'n ofynnol i unrhyw un sydd yn dymuno trosi tŷ annedd yn ail gartref - yn enwedig yn yr ardaloedd yma lle mae yna nifer uchel iawn o ail gartrefi - bod nhw angen caniatâd cynllunio cyn gwneud hynny? Mae yna newidiadau cynllunio eraill y gellid eu hystyried. Mae rhannau eraill - mae Cernyw, mae Ardal y Llynnoedd, wedi mynd i'r afael â hyn.
English: We do need a question now, so that we can conclude this question.
Welsh: Mae angen cwestiwn, i ddod â'r cwestiwn yma i ben.
English: I feel passionately about this, as you know, but the question is: what other changes, apart from the taxation changes, could your Government consider implementing in order to resolve this problem?
Welsh: Dwi yn teimlo yn angerddol am hwn, fel rydych chi'n gwybod, ond y cwestiwn ydy: pa newidiadau eraill, heblaw yr ochr drethiannol, fedr eich Llywodraeth chi eu hystyried a mynd i'r afael â nhw er mwyn datrys y broblem yma?
English: Minister, I remember Dafydd Wigley raising this issue in the first Assembly and talking about where they do have controlled housing markets, like the Channel Islands - that bastion of socialism in the English channel. The thing is, we do have a culture more widely in Britain of free market and second-home ownership, which I respect, but a lot of those people are also tempted sometimes to buy in Spain, in Italy, in France, where there's profound rural depopulation and villages lie empty, often. And it's a slightly different situation, to put it mildly, that we are facing, and we need a range of strategies: higher council tax where there is high housing need but second homes are being purchased; empty home strategies; and modest but necessary building up of villages. Now, it's one thing to have a pretty, pretty village, but it's not very pretty for the local young people if they cannot afford to live there and raise families. So, appropriate development, just like our ancestors have done for generations, should be required.
Welsh: Weinidog, rwy'n cofio Dafydd Wigley yn codi'r mater hwn yn y Cynulliad cyntaf ac yn sôn am ble mae ganddynt farchnadoedd tai rheoledig, fel Ynysoedd y Sianel - y cadarnle sosialaidd hwnnw yn y Sianel. Y peth yw, mae gennym ddiwylliant ehangach ym Mhrydain o berchentyaeth ail gartrefi a marchnad rydd, ac rwy'n parchu hynny, ond mae llawer o'r bobl hynny hefyd yn cael eu temtio weithiau i brynu yn Sbaen, yn yr Eidal, yn Ffrainc, lle ceir diboblogi gwledig dwys a phentrefi gwag yn aml. Ac mae'r sefyllfa rydym yn ei hwynebu ychydig yn wahanol, a dweud y lleiaf, ac mae arnom angen ystod o strategaethau: treth gyngor uwch lle mae llawer o angen am dai ond mae ail gartrefi'n cael eu prynu; strategaethau cartrefi gwag; ac adeiladu cymedrol ond angenrheidiol mewn pentrefi. Nawr, mae cael pentref tlws yn un peth, ond nid yw'n dlws iawn i'r bobl ifanc leol os na allant fforddio byw yno a magu teuluoedd. Felly, dylai fod angen datblygu priodol, yn union fel y mae ein hynafiaid wedi'i wneud ers cenedlaethau.
English: I recently launched our circular economy strategy, 'Beyond Recycling', which includes the headline action to phase out single-use plastic. Alongside this, we are working on game-changing reforms such as extended producer responsibility for packaging, a deposit-return scheme and a ban on certain single-use plastics.
Welsh: Yn ddiweddar, lansiais ein strategaeth economi gylchol, 'Mwy Nag Ailgylchu', sy'n cynnwys cael gwared ar blastig untro yn raddol fel un o'r prif gamau gweithredu. Ynghyd â hyn, rydym yn gweithio ar ddiwygiadau arloesol fel cyfrifoldeb estynedig cynhyrchwyr ar gyfer deunydd pacio, cynllun dychwelyd ernes a gwaharddiad ar rai mathau o blastig untro.
English: That's really good news to hear. The Minister must be as frustrated as I am when we go to the supermarkets that proclaim all the good work that they're doing on reducing plastics and we still see fruit and veg aisles lined with plastic-wrapped fruit and veg. It's quite interesting today that I've just spotted an organisation called Plastic Expiry, which is taking peaceful direct action by putting stickers on those plastic products labelling them, 'plastic expiry by 24 January 2499'. Consumers are leading the way in peaceful protest. But we had a great debate here last October, cross-party support, a motion that was passed by the House - pushing, encouraging and working with the Minister to say, 'Let's become that nation that becomes a global leader in sustainable consumption and in reducing plastic waste and single-use plastics in particular'. Could I ask her: are all tools on the table, including things such as appropriate tax and levies, bans on appropriate and specific single-use plastics? And will she continue to work with all those campaigning organisations, including the Marine Conservation Society, Keep Wales Tidy and Friends of the Earth - thank you for meeting with us the other day - but also those others out there who want to make this change because we know that the tide of plastic pollution is rising and we've got to stop it?
Welsh: Mae hynny'n newyddion da iawn i'w glywed. Mae'n rhaid fod y Gweinidog yn teimlo mor rhwystredig â minnau pan awn i'r archfarchnadoedd sy'n brolio am yr holl waith da a wnânt ar leihau'r defnydd o blastig ac rydym yn dal i weld eiliau ffrwythau a llysiau yn llawn ffrwythau a llysiau wedi'u pecynnu mewn plastig. Mae'n ddiddorol nodi heddiw fy mod newydd weld sefydliad o'r enw Plastic Expiry, sy'n gweithredu'n uniongyrchol mewn modd heddychlon drwy roi sticeri ar y cynhyrchion plastig sy'n dweud, 'dyddiad dod i ben y plastig yw 24 Ionawr 2499'. Mae'r defnyddwyr yn arwain y ffordd drwy brotestio'n heddychlon. Ond cawsom ddadl wych yma fis Hydref y llynedd, cefnogaeth drawsbleidiol, cynnig a dderbyniwyd gan y Tŷ - gan wthio, annog a gweithio gyda'r Gweinidog i ddweud, 'Dewch i ni fod yn genedl sy'n arwain y byd o ran defnydd cynaliadwy a lleihau gwastraff plastig a phlastigau untro yn enwedig'. A gaf fi ofyn iddi: a ydym yn gwneud popeth a allwn, gan gynnwys pethau fel trethi ac ardollau priodol, gwaharddiadau ar blastigau untro priodol a phenodol? Ac a fydd yn parhau i weithio gyda'r holl sefydliadau ymgyrchu, gan gynnwys y Gymdeithas Cadwraeth Forol, Cadwch Gymru'n Daclus a Chyfeillion y Ddaear - diolch am gyfarfod â ni y diwrnod o'r blaen - ond hefyd y bobl eraill sy'n dymuno gwneud y newid hwn gan y gwyddom fod y llanw o lygredd plastig yn codi ac mae'n rhaid i ni ei atal?
English: Deputy Minister, earlier this week, I met with pupils from St Aidan's Church in Wales School in Wiston just outside Haverfordwest in my constituency, which has set up a petition to ban single-use plastic milk bottles in schools across Wales. I'm sure you'll agree with me that it's great to see children and young people engaging with our petitions process and taking action on some of our biggest issues. In the circumstances, what support can the Welsh Government offer to the pupils of St Aidan's Church in Wales School, and what discussions have you had specifically with local authorities about banning single-use plastic milk bottles in schools across Wales?
Welsh: Ddirprwy Weinidog, yn gynharach yr wythnos hon, cyfarfûm â disgyblion o Ysgol yr Eglwys yng Nghymru Aeddan Sant yng Nghas-wis ger Hwlffordd yn fy etholaeth, sydd wedi cychwyn deiseb i wahardd poteli llaeth plastig untro mewn ysgolion ledled Cymru. Rwy'n siŵr y byddwch yn cytuno â mi ei bod yn wych gweld plant a phobl ifanc yn ymgysylltu â'n proses ddeisebau ac yn cymryd camau ar rai o'n problemau mwyaf. O dan yr amgylchiadau, pa gefnogaeth y gall Llywodraeth Cymru ei chynnig i ddisgyblion Ysgol yr Eglwys yng Nghymru Aeddan Sant, a pha drafodaethau penodol a gawsoch gydag awdurdodau lleol ynghylch gwahardd poteli llaeth plastig untro mewn ysgolion ledled Cymru?
English: Thank you, Deputy Minister and Minister for replying to those questions. So - [ Interruption.]
Welsh: Diolch i'r Dirprwy Weinidog a'r Gweinidog am yr atebion a'r sesiwn gwestiynau yna. Ac felly - [ Torri ar draws.]
English: Thank you. I did try to raise this with your office earlier, so thank you for taking this for me.
Welsh: Diolch. Fe geisiais godi hyn gyda'ch swyddfa yn gynharach, felly diolch am dderbyn y pwynt hwn gennyf.
English: Your office informed my office of an intention to raise a point of order a few minutes before I left to come down to the Chamber. I haven't had the opportunity to review that as yet, and I intend to tell you, once you have raised your point of order here very quickly, then, that I will review it subsequently to this. I'm sitting here with my mobile phone, I'm unable to actually look at any proceedings of last week's events.
Welsh: Cafodd fy swyddfa wybod gan eich swyddfa chi am fwriad i godi pwynt o drefn ychydig funudau cyn i mi adael i ddod i lawr i'r Siambr. Nid wyf wedi cael cyfle i'w adolygu eto, ac rwy'n bwriadu dweud wrthych, ar ôl i chi godi eich pwynt o drefn yma yn gyflym iawn, y byddaf yn ei adolygu wedyn. Rwy'n eistedd yma gyda fy ffôn symudol, ni allaf edrych ar drafodion digwyddiadau'r wythnos diwethaf.
English: Okay, but thank you for taking this, Llywydd. Could you please make a ruling on Standing Orders 13.94 and 13.95 on whether Alun Davies's behaviour last week in the Chamber was discourteous and distracted from the dignity of this place? Alun shouted across the Chamber, 'You are a racist'. Now, on the Record of Proceedings, this comment actually follows my name being called by you, and I wasn't even in that conversation at that time. This is unacceptable to me. Members here should be able to make their point without being subjected to bullying and name calling, and I would like this comment, please, of Alun's to be removed from the Record and I would like to know where we all stand in terms of this kind of name calling.
Welsh: Iawn, ond diolch am dderbyn hyn, Lywydd. A allech wneud dyfarniad ar Reolau Sefydlog 13.94 a 13.95 ynglŷn ag a oedd ymddygiad Alun Davies yr wythnos diwethaf yn y Siambr yn anghwrtais ac yn amharu ar urddas y lle hwn? Gwaeddodd Alun ar draws y Siambr, 'Rydych chi'n hiliol'. Nawr, yng Nghofnod y Trafodion, mae'r sylw hwn yn dilyn fy enw'n cael ei alw gennych chi, ac nid oeddwn yn rhan o'r sgwrs honno hyd yn oed ar y pryd. Mae hyn yn annerbyniol i mi. Dylai'r Aelodau yma allu gwneud eu pwynt heb fod yn destun bwlio a galw enwau, ac os gwelwch yn dda, hoffwn i sylw Alun gael ei dynnu o'r Cofnod a hoffwn wybod beth yw'r sefyllfa o ran y math hwn o alw enwau.
English: Thank you for the point of order, and yes, I'll make a ruling on it once I've reviewed the Record of Proceedings in last week's proceedings. So, if you allow me to do that - . As I said earlier, I'm not able to review it on my mobile phone in the Chamber, even though I do make quite a bit of use, sometimes, as some of you who send me texts know, of my mobile phone, but not to review last week's proceedings. So, I will consider that at a later stage.
Welsh: Diolch am y pwynt o drefn, a gwnaf, fe wnaf ddyfarniad arno ar ôl i mi adolygu Cofnod y Trafodion ar gyfer trafodion yr wythnos diwethaf. Felly, os gwnewch chi ganiatáu i mi wneud hynny - . Fel y dywedais yn gynharach, ni allaf ei adolygu ar fy ffôn symudol yn y Siambr, er fy mod yn defnyddio cryn dipyn ar fy ffôn symudol weithiau, fel y gŵyr rhai ohonoch sy'n anfon negeseuon testun i mi, ond nid i adolygu trafodion yr wythnos diwethaf. Felly, byddaf yn ystyried hynny maes o law.
English: Topical questions.
Welsh: Cwestiynau amserol.
English: The first topical question is to be asked to the Minister for Health and Social Services, and the question is from Caroline Jones.
Welsh: Mae'r cwestiwn amserol cyntaf, felly, yn cael ei ofyn i'r Gweinidog Iechyd a Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol, ac mae'r cwestiwn gan Caroline Jones.