English: Ian Price, the CBI Wales director, said today that this is a dark day for the Welsh economy, pointing out that we've had decades of deliberation, over £40 million spent, and no problem has yet been solved. He goes on to say that economic growth will be stifled, confidence in the region will weaken, and the cost of an eventual relief road will rise. That is the view of business leaders across Wales. Now, you've talked today, First Minister, about a genuinely open process. You've mentioned the words, 'it's the price of living in a democracy'. But, at the same time, you've actively prevented public scrutiny with the decision to withhold the public inquiry report. And you've mentioned you've been flicking through those pages for months; we haven't had the opportunity - other AMs have not had the opportunity to look at that report. Can I ask you to explain, First Minister, why you could have not published that report without the legal advice attached to it? You say that the cost of the project and the potential demands on the Welsh Government's capital budget mean that you are not in a position to provide funding for this project. The inspector concluded that the project would, of course, constitute sound value for money and deliver considerable advantages. Your own Welsh economist gave evidence to the public inquiry that the project had a benefit-cost ratio of 2.0:2.2, with economic benefits of £2.12 billion. So, do you no longer accept the views of Welsh Government officials and those working on behalf of the Welsh Government that made this case to the public inquiry on your behalf? The transport Minister said in 2016 that the new section of the M4 would be opened by autumn 2021. The building of the road was in the Labour party's election manifesto. It was a pledge in your 2016 manifesto. The leader of the opposition and other Members have asked this question: do you acknowledge that this pledge has now been completely broken? Also, you have said that the so-called expert commission will now be appointed. Well, what is a two-year public inquiry at a cost to the Welsh taxpayer of £44 million all about if that inquiry didn't discuss all the options in extensive detail? Jayne Bryant has said we surely can't go back to square one. Well, this commission is doing just that. It's going back to square one. That's what this commission is doing. And, finally, I was in this Chamber when the former leader of the house committed - committed - to holding a binding vote. The leader of the opposition has asked the question. You, First Minister, have not answered it. Can you now answer the question on the binding vote that was promised to this Chamber?
Welsh: Dywedodd Ian Price, Cyfarwyddwr CBI Cymru, heddiw fod hwn yn ddiwrnod tywyll i economi Cymru, gan dynnu sylw at y ffaith ein bod wedi cael degawdau o drafod, dros £40 miliwn wedi'i wario, ac nad oes yr un broblem wedi cael ei datrys hyd yn hyn. Fe ddywed ymhellach y bydd twf economaidd yn cael ei lethu, y bydd hyder yn y rhanbarth yn gwanhau, ac y bydd cost ffordd liniaru yn y pen draw yn codi. Dyna farn arweinwyr busnes ledled Cymru. Nawr, rydych wedi sôn heddiw, Prif Weinidog, am broses wirioneddol agored. Rydych wedi crybwyll y geiriau, 'Dyma bris byw mewn democratiaeth'. Ond, ar yr un pryd, rydych wedi mynd ati i atal craffu cyhoeddus gyda'r penderfyniad i atal yr adroddiad ar yr ymchwiliad cyhoeddus. Ac rydych wedi sôn eich bod wedi bod yn bodio drwy'r tudalennau hynny am fisoedd; nid ydym ni wedi cael y cyfle - nid yw ACau eraill wedi cael y cyfle i edrych ar yr adroddiad hwnnw. A gaf i ofyn ichi egluro, Prif Weinidog, pam na allech chi gyhoeddi'r adroddiad hwnnw heb y cyngor cyfreithiol sydd ynghlwm wrtho? Rydych yn dweud bod cost y prosiect a'r gofynion posibl ar gyllideb gyfalaf Llywodraeth Cymru yn golygu nad ydych mewn sefyllfa i ddarparu cyllid ar gyfer y prosiect hwn. Daeth yr arolygydd i'r casgliad y byddai'r prosiect, wrth gwrs, yn golygu gwerth cadarn am arian ac yn cynnig manteision sylweddol. Rhoddodd eich economegydd eich hun yng Nghymru dystiolaeth i'r ymchwiliad cyhoeddus fod gan y prosiect gymhareb cost a budd o 2.0:2.2, gyda buddiannau economaidd o £2,12 biliwn. Felly, ydych chi ddim yn derbyn barn swyddogion Llywodraeth Cymru a'r rhai sy'n gweithio ar ran Llywodraeth Cymru a wnaeth yr achos hwn i'r ymchwiliad cyhoeddus ar eich rhan? Dywedodd y Gweinidog Trafnidiaeth yn 2016 y byddai'r darn newydd o'r M4 yn cael ei agor erbyn tymor yr hydref 2021. Roedd adeiladu'r ffordd ym maniffesto etholiadol y Blaid Lafur. Roedd yn addewid yn eich maniffesto yn 2016. Mae arweinydd yr wrthblaid ac aelodau eraill wedi gofyn y cwestiwn hwn: a ydych yn cydnabod bod yr addewid hwn wedi'i dorri'n llwyr erbyn hyn? Hefyd, rydych wedi dweud y bydd y comisiwn arbenigol, fel y'i gelwir, yn cael ei benodi nawr. Wel, beth oedd pwrpas ymchwiliad cyhoeddus a gymerodd ddwy flynedd ac a gostiodd £44 miliwn i drethdalwyr Cymru os na chafodd yr holl ddewisiadau eu trafod yn fanwl yn yr ymchwiliad hwnnw? Mae Jayne Bryant wedi dweud nad oes modd inni fynd yn ôl i'r dechrau eto. Wel, dyna'n union y mae'r comisiwn hwn yn ei wneud, mae'n mynd yn ôl i'r dechrau. Dyna mae'r comisiwn yn ei wneud. Ac, yn olaf, roeddwn yn y Siambr hon pan ymrwymodd cyn arweinydd y tŷ - fe ymrwymodd - i gynnal pleidlais rwymol. Mae arweinydd yr wrthblaid wedi gofyn y cwestiwn. Nid ydych chi, Prif Weinidog, wedi'i ateb. A wnewch chi ateb y cwestiwn ynglŷn â'r bleidlais rwymol a addawyd i'r Siambr hon nawr?