techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, let me begin by agreeing with what Andrew R.T. Davies has said about the inconsistencies in some of the arguments that we hear from the banking industry and how some of the undertakings that it has previously given, as Mick Antoniw said, never to be the final bank to close - that's a promise that they have failed to live up to, we know, in many instances. From the public's point of view, it is often quite difficult to understand the link between their own experience of a bank that is always busy when they visit it, which seems to be working flat out, when the bank says to them that it is closing because its services are no longer needed. What I will do is make sure that the points that have been made this afternoon, particularly in relation to access to banking services by businesses in those parts of Wales where the banking coverage is now skeletal or non-existent - I'll make sure that Ken Skates has heard those points clearly and that he is able to take them up in the plans that he will be developing to make sure that businesses in Wales are not frustrated in their ability to conduct their own affairs or to grow because there aren't services for them that they are able to access.
Welsh: Wel, gadewch i mi ddechrau drwy gytuno â'r hyn a ddywedodd Andrew R.T. Davies am anghysonderau yn rhai o'r dadleuon a glywn gan y diwydiant bancio a sut nad yw rhai o'r ymrwymiadau a wnaeth y diwydiant yn flaenorol, fel y dywedodd Mick Antoniw, i beidio byth â bod y banc olaf i gau - dyna addewid y maent wedi methu ei gadw mewn llawer o achosion fel y gwyddom. O safbwynt y cyhoedd, mae'n aml yn eithaf anodd deall y cysylltiad rhwng eu profiadau eu hunain o fanc sydd bob amser yn brysur pan fyddant yn ymweld ag ef, sydd i'w weld yn gweithio'n ddi-baid, pan fo'r banc yn dweud wrthynt ei fod yn cau oherwydd nad oes angen ei wasanaethau mwyach. Yr hyn a wnaf yw gwneud yn siŵr fod y pwyntiau a wnaed y prynhawn yma, yn arbennig mewn perthynas â mynediad at wasanaethau bancio gan fusnesau yn y rhannau hynny o Gymru lle mae'r ddarpariaeth fancio bellach yn denau iawn neu lle nad yw'n bodoli o gwbl - fe wnaf yn siŵr fod Ken Skates wedi clywed y pwyntiau hynny'n glir a'i fod yn gallu mynd ar eu trywydd yn y cynlluniau y bydd yn eu datblygu i wneud yn siŵr nad yw busnesau yng Nghymru yn teimlo'n rhwystredig ynghylch eu gallu i gyflawni eu materion eu hunain neu i dyfu oherwydd nad oes gwasanaethau ar gael iddynt allu gwneud defnydd ohonynt.
English: Diolch Suzy. I'm replying on behalf of the Cabinet Secretary. Pinewood remains committed to operating the studio in Wentloog and continuing to promote Wales internationally as a destination for high-end tv and film production.
Welsh: Diolch, Suzy. Rwy'n ymateb ar ran Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet. Mae Pinewood yn parhau'n ymrwymedig i weithredu'r stiwdio yng Ngwynllwg a pharhau i hyrwyddo Cymru'n rhyngwladol fel cyrchfan ar gyfer cynhyrchu ffilm a theledu o ansawdd uchel.
English: Well, I don't know about meat on the bone, because I'm not a very good butcher. However, I would like to emphasise that the commitment to Pinewood remains, and that that commitment will mean the operation of the studio under a new agreement. Aspects of that agreement remain commercial in confidence, but I am very happy to offer you a meeting, where I would be able to discuss in greater detail how these arrangements have been arrived at. I can say that, whereas this does indicate that Pinewood is no longer concentrating on film investment, and the assessment of film investment, in the previous way of agreement, I can tell her that the work that Pinewood has helped to undertake to elevate Wales as a premier production location has given us already global advantages. The situation in the Isle of Man, I have to tell her, is also changing, as far as how Pinewood is operating. I will apologise to her for any delay in replying to the questions that she has asked. I welcome her detailed scrutiny. She did ask questions going back to 2011, but I can assure her that the amount of time that has been used to respond to those questions has been to ensure the quality of the information. I can also say to her that there is a very important element of supply chain in that studio, including essential supply chain companies, such as Andy Dixon Facilities, Real SFX, and Lubas Medical, and you must be aware of that. And that is an indication of the way in which the creative industry sector has shown significant growth in the last few years.
Welsh: Wel, nid wyf yn gwybod am gig ar yr asgwrn, oherwydd nid wyf yn gigydd da iawn. Fodd bynnag, hoffwn bwysleisio bod yr ymrwymiad i Pinewood yn parhau, ac y bydd yr ymrwymiad hwnnw'n golygu gweithrediad y stiwdio o dan gytundeb newydd. Mae agweddau ar y cytundeb hwnnw'n dal i fod yn fasnachol gyfrinachol, ond rwy'n hapus iawn i gynnig cyfarfod i chi, lle y gallwn drafod yn fanylach sut y penderfynwyd ar y trefniadau hyn. Er bod hyn yn dynodi nad yw Pinewood mwyach yn canolbwyntio ar fuddsoddi mewn ffilmiau, ac asesu buddsoddiad mewn ffilmiau, yn y ffordd y cytunwyd yn flaenorol, gallaf ddweud wrthi fod y gwaith y mae Pinewood wedi helpu i'w wneud i ddyrchafu Cymru fel lleoliad cynhyrchu o'r radd flaenaf wedi rhoi manteision byd-eang inni eisoes. Rhaid i mi ddweud wrthi fod y sefyllfa yn Ynys Manaw yn newid hefyd, o ran y modd y mae Pinewood yn gweithredu. Ymddiheuraf iddi am unrhyw oedi cyn ateb y cwestiynau y mae hi wedi eu gofyn. Rwy'n croesawu ei chraffu manwl. Gofynnodd gwestiynau sy'n mynd yn ôl i 2011, ond gallaf ei sicrhau bod faint o amser a ddefnyddiwyd i ymateb i'r cwestiynau wedi'i dreulio'n sicrhau ansawdd y wybodaeth. Gallaf ddweud wrthi hefyd fod elfen dra phwysig o'r gadwyn gyflenwi yn y stiwdio honno, gan gynnwys cwmnïau cadwyn cyflenwi hanfodol, megis Andy Dixon Facilities, Real SFX, a Lubas Medical, a rhaid i chi fod yn ymwybodol o hynny. Ac mae hynny'n arwydd o'r ffordd y mae'r sector diwydiannau creadigol wedi dangos twf sylweddol yn y blynyddoedd diwethaf.
English: Would the Minister accept that part of the broader context to some of the questions that Suzy Davies has been asking, over a period of some years now, and part of the challenge for the Government, is to be clear as to the policy intention in terms of the investment in the film industry? Is it to attract international companies to produce more here in Wales, or is it, from an economic development perspective, to invest in Welsh companies, or is there a cultural objective, that is to have content - stories from Wales, if you wish - on the silver screen? I think, from his background in the days of Sgrîn, perhaps he would be aware of that tension that can exist. And can we have, from the new Minister, a little more clarity on the policy intentions of Government, so that we then, in scrutinising this, can assess to what extent the Government is reaching its aims and objectives?
Welsh: A fyddai'r Gweinidog yn derbyn mai rhan o'r cyd-destun, efallai, ehangach i rai o'r cwestiynau y mae Suzy Davies wedi bod yn eu gofyn ers rhai blynyddoedd, a rhan o'r her, rwy'n credu, i'r Llywodraeth, ydy bod yn glir beth yw diben polisi y buddsoddiad yn y diwydiant ffilm. Ai denu cwmnïau rhyngwladol i wneud mwy o gynyrchiadau yng Nghymru, neu, o bersbectif datblygu economaidd, i fuddsoddi yn hytrach mewn cwmnïau Cymreig, neu, a dweud y gwir, a oes yna ddiben diwylliannol, hynny yw i gael cynnwys - straeon o Gymru, os mynnwch chi - ar y sgrin fawr? Rwy'n credu, o'i gefndir e, wrth gwrs, yn nyddiau Sgrîn, efallai y byddai'n ymwybodol o'r tensiwn yma sy'n gallu bodoli. Ac a gawn ni, gan y Gweinidog newydd, ychydig bach mwy o eglurder ynglŷn â diben polisi'r Llywodraeth, fel ein bod ni wedyn, wrth gwrs, wrth graffu, yn gallu asesu i ba raddau y mae'r Llywodraeth yn cyrraedd y nod?
English: Thank you very much for that series of questions. I would expect no less from the Member. But my answer, very clearly, is that the three objectives that he has set out are interlinked and all relevant to the film industry, of any kind. And what has happened here, of course, is that commercial changes have taken place in the ownership of Pinewood and that that has led to new priorities for the company in the way that it works, and the Welsh Government has been working very closely with Pinewood on that situation. In addition to the international investments and the attempt to attract international companies to produce in Wales, and bring jobs to Wales, we as a Government have also, through the arts council, invested in Ffilm Cymru Wales - and I look forward to working with them - which has a greater cultural emphasis, in the usual meaning of the word there, although I personally consider all film production, certainly, as part of our culture - it has more of an artistic value in that regard, and that work will continue. And as I have extended an invitation to Suzy, I'll also extend it to you to have an intelligent conversation as to the Government's aims to this end.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr am y gyfres o gwestiynau. Ni fyddwn yn disgwyl dim byd arall oddi wrth yr Aelod. Ond fy ateb i, yn glir iawn, yw bod y tri diben y mae e wedi eu nodi yn gydberthnasol i'r diwydiant ffilm, o unrhyw fath. A beth sydd wedi digwydd yn y fan yma, wrth gwrs, yw bod yna newidiadau masnachol wedi digwydd ym mherchnogaeth Pinewood, a bod hynny wedi arwain at flaenoriaethau newydd i'r cwmni yn y ffordd mae e'n gweithio, ac y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi bod yn gweithio yn agos gyda Pinewood ynglŷn â'r sefyllfa yna. Yn ogystal â'r buddsoddiadau rhyngwladol, a'r ymgais i ddenu cwmnïau rhyngwladol i gynhyrchu yng Nghymru, a'r swyddi sy'n cael eu creu, rydym ni hefyd fel Llywodraeth, drwy gyngor y celfyddydau, yn buddsoddi yn Ffilm Cymru - ac rwy'n edrych ymlaen at gyfarfod â nhw - sydd â phwyslais mwy diwylliannol, yn yr ystyr arferol i'r gair, er fy mod i'n ystyried y cyfan o gynnyrch ffilm, yn sicr, yn rhan o'n diwylliant ni - o leiaf, mae e'n fwy celfyddydol yn yr ystyr yna, ac mi fydd y gwaith yna yn parhau. Ac fel rwyf wedi estyn gwahoddiad i Suzy Davies, fe estynnaf yr un math o wahoddiad i ni gael trafodaeth ddeallus ynglŷn ag amcanion y Llywodraeth yn y cyfeiriad yma.
English: My objective is to provide a smooth transition for the development industry and communities. The relevant UK Government department, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, initially agreed to delay commencement. However, at the insistence of the Wales Office, the planning provisions will now be commenced prematurely, placing Wales at a disadvantage compared to the rest of the UK.
Welsh: Fy amcan yw sicrhau pontio llyfn ar gyfer y diwydiant datblygu a chymunedau. I ddechrau, cytunodd adran berthnasol Llywodraeth y DU, yr Adran Busnes, Ynni a Strategaeth Ddiwydiannol, i oedi cyn cychwyn. Fodd bynnag, am fod Swyddfa Cymru'n mynnu, bydd y darpariaethau cynllunio yn cychwyn cyn pryd bellach, gan roi Cymru dan anfantais o gymharu â gweddill y DU.
English: I'm not sure I understand that answer. These powers relate to fracking and the electricity generation stations with 350 MW or less, and they're now being delayed until October 2018 and April 2019 - as far as I can work out because the Welsh Government does not consider that it has the capacity to take on those new powers at the moment. And I think that's what you've got to answer, given that we've known these powers are coming; it's been a long process. And if there is a problem with present capacity, how can we be sure that Welsh Government will be capable of exercising these powers in October 2018 and April 2019, or will we have a further postponement?
Welsh: Nid wyf yn siŵr fy mod yn deall yr ateb hwnnw. Mae'r pwerau hyn yn ymwneud â ffracio a gorsafoedd cynhyrchu trydan gyda 350 MW neu lai, ac maent bellach yn cael eu gohirio tan fis Hydref 2018 a mis Ebrill 2019 - cyn belled ag y gwelaf am nad yw Llywodraeth Cymru yn ystyried bod ganddi gapasiti i ymgymryd â'r pwerau newydd ar hyn o bryd. Ac rwy'n credu mai hynny sy'n rhaid i chi ei ateb, o ystyried ein bod yn gwybod bod y pwerau hyn yn dod; mae wedi bod yn broses hir. Ac os oes problem gyda'r capasiti presennol, sut y gallwn fod yn sicr y bydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn gallu arfer y pwerau hyn ym mis Hydref 2018 a mis Ebrill 2019, neu a fydd yn rhaid inni ohirio ymhellach?
English: I think I perhaps need to put some facts out here. I think there's a bit of mischief making by the Wales Office. I don't want people to think we've been sitting around doing nothing. You made reference to capacity. So, we've been working with the industry, we've been working with developers, we've been working with planning consultants, we've been working with Natural Resource Wales, to ensure that we can scope what's required. There was an agreement between BEIS and Welsh Government that those powers could be delayed. The Wales Office then got involved and that is now no longer the case. And, as I said, we've now been placed, I think, at a disadvantage. I know people have asked me why Scotland are able to do things quicker than us, for instance, and I should say that the case in Wales is very different to Scotland. Scotland was transferred directly to a fit-for-purpose consenting process that did not require transitional arrangements. We were not in that position, and because we'd been placed into inferior regimes, for instance, we needed to have a transitional arrangement, and that was agreed between ourselves and with BEIS.
Welsh: Credaf efallai fod angen i mi roi rhai ffeithiau yn y fan hon. Credaf fod Swyddfa Cymru yn creu helynt braidd. Nid wyf am i bobl feddwl ein bod wedi bod yn gwneud dim. Fe gyfeirioch chi at gapasiti. Felly, rydym wedi bod yn gweithio gyda'r diwydiant, rydym wedi bod yn gweithio gyda datblygwyr, rydym wedi bod yn gweithio gyda chynghorwyr cynllunio, rydym wedi bod yn gweithio gyda Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru, i sicrhau y gallwn gwmpasu'r hyn sy'n ofynnol. Cafwyd cytundeb rhwng yr Adran Busnes, Ynni a Strategaeth Ddiwydiannol a Llywodraeth Cymru y gellid oedi'r pwerau hynny. Yna, daeth Swyddfa Cymru yn rhan o bethau ac nid yw hynny'n wir mwyach. Ac fel y dywedais, rydym wedi cael ein gosod dan anfantais bellach, rwy'n credu. Gwn fod pobl wedi gofyn i mi pam y mae'r Alban yn gallu gwneud pethau'n gyflymach na ni, er enghraifft, a dylwn ddweud bod pethau'n wahanol iawn i'r Alban yng Nghymru. Cafodd yr Alban ei throsglwyddo'n uniongyrchol i broses gydsynio addas at y diben nad oedd yn galw am drefniadau trosiannol. Nid oeddem yn y sefyllfa honno, ac oherwydd ein bod wedi cael ein gosod mewn cyfundrefnau israddol, er enghraifft, roedd angen trefniant trosiannol arnom, a chafodd hwnnw ei gytuno rhyngom a'r Adran Busnes, Ynni a Strategaeth Ddiwydiannol.
English: I'm still uncertain as to what's happened here. Can you, Cabinet Secretary, just confirm that you did ask for these powers to be postponed, and for the implementation to be postponed? The only thing we've heard as an Assembly, officially to date, has been that all these powers come into force on 1 April next year. And last week, or it might have been the week before - apologies - I asked both the First Minister and the Counsel General about the implementation of fracking powers, which are the petroleum powers that we're talking about, and neither of them told me there was any delay to these powers coming in. Both of them accepted my question on the premise of these powers being available in April 2018. So, is it now the case that they're not coming in, as I understand it, until October 2018, and the further powers on electricity generating stations, so the 350 MW powers - I take it those are not until April 2019. Can you just confirm that's the position, and also confirm that this is at your request, and also then confirm what you're going to do as a Government to provide the security and assurance that we need that you're capable of exercising these powers?
Welsh: Rwy'n dal yn ansicr beth sydd wedi digwydd yma. Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, a allwch gadarnhau eich bod wedi gofyn i'r pwerau hyn gael eu gohirio, ac i'r gweithrediad gael ei ohirio? Yr unig beth rydym wedi ei glywed fel Cynulliad, yn swyddogol hyd yn hyn, yw bod yr holl bwerau hyn yn dod i rym ar 1 Ebrill y flwyddyn nesaf. A'r wythnos diwethaf, neu efallai yr wythnos cynt - ymddiheuriadau - gofynnais i'r Prif Weinidog a'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol am weithrediad pwerau ffracio, sef y pwerau petroliwm rydym yn sôn amdanynt, ac ni ddywedodd yr un ohonynt wrthyf fod unrhyw oedi cyn y daw'r pwerau hyn i mewn. Derbyniodd y ddau ohonynt fy nghwestiwn ar y cynsail y byddai'r y pwerau hyn ar gael ym mis Ebrill 2018. Felly, a yw'n wir yn awr nad ydynt yn dod i ni, fel y deallaf, tan fis Hydref 2018, ac nad yw'r pwerau pellach ar orsafoedd cynhyrchu trydan, felly'r pwerau 350 MW - rwy'n cymryd nad yw'r rheini'n dod tan fis Ebrill 2019. A allwch gadarnhau mai dyna yw'r sefyllfa, a chadarnhau hefyd felly mai chi sy'n gofyn am hyn, a chadarnhau beth rydych yn mynd i'w wneud fel Llywodraeth i ddarparu'r diogelwch a'r sicrwydd sydd ei angen arnom eich bod yn gallu arfer y pwerau hyn?
English: I can confirm those two dates: the October 2018 and the 2019. And, yes, we have requested that, because Welsh Government and BEIS officials, and it was back in 2017 - during the passage of the Wales Bill, agreement was gained that the new executive powers would not commence in April of next year. So, as I say, that was the agreement reached between Welsh Government and with BEIS until the Wales Office intervened.
Welsh: Gallaf gadarnhau'r ddau ddyddiad: mis Hydref 2018 a'r un yn 2019. Ac rydym wedi gofyn am hynny oherwydd bod Llywodraeth Cymru a swyddogion yr Adran Busnes, Ynni a Strategaeth Ddiwydiannol, yn ôl yn 2017 - yn ystod taith Bil Cymru drwy'r Senedd, cafwyd cytundeb na fyddai'r pwerau gweithredol newydd yn dechrau ym mis Ebrill y flwyddyn nesaf. Felly, fel y dywedaf, dyna oedd y cytundeb a gafwyd rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru a'r Adran Busnes, Ynni a Strategaeth Ddiwydiannol nes i Swyddfa Cymru ymyrryd.
English: As a result of this delay in the transfer of powers, is it the case that the UK Government could impose fracking on Wales, even though this could be against the wishes of the population?
Welsh: O ganlyniad i'r oedi hwn wrth drosglwyddo pwerau, a yw'n wir y gallai Llywodraeth y DU orfodi ffracio ar Gymru, er y gallai hyn fod yn groes i ddymuniadau'r boblogaeth?
English: No, it's not.
Welsh: Na, nid yw hynny'n wir.
English: Llywydd, last Thursday, I attended a ceremony in Alexandra Gardens in Cathays Park to re-dedicate the Gift of Life stone in memory of all organ and tissue donors. This memorial stone was places in the park 10 years ago with the support of Kidney Wales and families whose loved ones had donated their organs and tissues. Two families were from Barry: Colin and Bet Burgess and Gaynor Taylor. Louise Burgess and Richard Taylor carried donor cards when they tragically lost their young lives. Colin Burgess wrote the epitaph on the Gift of Life stone: 'They cared for those they helped, and those they helped, remember'. Both families support the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013 to give deemed consent for organ and tissue donation and they welcome the lead Wales has taken in the UK. Two years on since the Act, there's been continued and increased public support for the new organ donation system in Wales and it's good to see the Welsh public embracing the changes that are designed to save lives. Colin, Bet and Gaynor continue to speak up for organ donation as a precious gift so others might live and I thank them for their courage and inspiration.
Welsh: Lywydd, ddydd Iau diwethaf, mynychais seremoni yng Ngerddi Alexandra ym Mharc Cathays i ailgysegru'r garreg Rhodd Bywyd er cof am yr holl roddwyr organau a meinweoedd. Cafodd y garreg goffa hon ei gosod yn y parc 10 mlynedd yn ôl gyda chefnogaeth Sefydliad Aren Cymru a theuluoedd pobl yr oedd eu hanwyliaid wedi rhoi eu horganau a'u meinweoedd. Roedd dau o'r teuluoedd yn dod o'r Barri: Colin a Bet Burgess a Gaynor Taylor. Roedd Louise Burgess a Richard Taylor yn cario cardiau rhoddwr pan gollodd y ddau eu bywydau ifanc yn drasig. Colin Burgess a ysgrifennodd y beddargraff ar y garreg Rhodd Bywyd a oedd yn dweud eu bod yn malio am y rhai roeddent yn eu helpu, a bod y rhai roeddent wedi eu helpu yn cofio. Mae'r ddau deulu'n cefnogi Deddf Trawsblannu Dynol (Cymru) 2013 i roi cydsyniad tybiedig ar gyfer rhoi organau a meinweoedd ac maent yn croesawu'r arweiniad y mae Cymru wedi ei roi yn y DU. Ddwy flynedd ers y Ddeddf, gwelwyd cefnogaeth barhaus a chynyddol i'r system rhoi organau newydd yng Nghymru ac mae'n dda gweld y cyhoedd yng Nghymru yn croesawu'r newidiadau a luniwyd i arbed bywydau. Mae Colin, Bet a Gaynor yn parhau i siarad o blaid rhoi organau fel rhodd werthfawr fel y gall eraill fyw ac rwy'n diolch iddynt am eu dewrder a'u hysbrydoliaeth.
English: On Monday, 11 December we will be commemorating Llywelyn ap Gruffydd, or Llywelyn ein Llyw Olaf, Llywelyn the Last. Llywelyn was the first, of course, to be acknowledged Prince of Wales, and through the Treaty of Montgomery in 1267 the King of England, Henry III, had to accept terms and acknowledge that he was the leader of Wales and that Wales was an independent country, to all intents and purposes. Llywelyn introduced a civil service and a taxation system to administer Wales under his leadership. But this order was not acceptable to Edward I, of course, and he forced Llywelyn to surrender land and return to his stronghold in Gwynedd, having lost ground. In March 1282 a rebellion began as Welshmen attacked Hawarden castle in Flintshire in order to regain lost lands. But the rebellion came to an end six months later, with Llywelyn having been separated from his 7,000-strong army, and killed in Cilmeri by Stephen de Frankton, one of Edward I's soldiers. His head was sent to the king in London and was paraded through the streets of London to be shown to the people of the city, before being left upon an iron post outside the Tower of London. Within months, Gwynedd lost all its royal insignia and Wales lost its status for the time. I will be wearing ivy on Monday and I would suggest that you should all do so in memory and commemoration of Llywelyn ap Gruffydd, and to demonstrate that the independent spirit of Llywelyn the Last Prince of Wales is still alive.
Welsh: Ddydd Llun, 11 Rhagfyr byddwn ni'n cofio Llywelyn ap Gruffudd, neu Llywelyn ein Llyw Olaf. Llywelyn oedd y cyntaf, wrth gwrs, i gael ei gydnabod fel Tywysog Cymru a thrwy gytundeb Trefaldwyn ym 1267 bu'n rhaid i Harri III dderbyn telerau a chydnabod tywysogaeth Llywelyn a hawl Cymru, i bob pwrpas, i fod yn wlad annibynnol. Fe gyflwynodd Llywelyn system drethu a gwasanaeth sifil i weinyddu'r wlad dan ei arweinyddiaeth. Ond nid oedd y drefn yma wrth fodd Edward I, wrth gwrs, a orfododd Llywelyn i ildio tir a chilio yn ôl i'w gadarnle yng Ngwynedd. Ym Mawrth 1282 cychwynnodd gwrthryfel wrth i'r Cymry ymosod ar gastell Penarlâg yn sir y Fflint er mwyn adennill tiroedd coll. Ond mi ddaeth y gwrthryfel i ben chwe mis yn ddiweddarach gyda Llywelyn yn cael ei rannu oddi wrth ei fyddin o ryw 7,000 o ddynion ar 11 Rhagfyr a'i ladd mewn sgarmes ger Cilmeri gan Steffan de Frankton, un o filwyr Edward I. Anfonwyd ei ben i'r brenin yn Llundain, a'i gludo drwy strydoedd y ddinas i'w arddangos i'r bobl cyn ei adael i bydru ar bostyn haearn ger Tŵr Llundain. O fewn misoedd, fe gollodd Gwynedd ei holl insignia brenhinol ac fe gamfeddiannwyd Cymru am y tro. Mi fyddaf i'n gwisgo iorwg ddydd Llun, ac mi fuaswn i'n annog pob un ohonoch chi i wisgo iorwg er cof am Llywelyn ap Gruffudd ac er mwyn datgan yn glir fod ysbryd annibynnol Llywelyn ein Llyw Olaf yn dal yn fyw.
English: The next item is a debate on a Member's legislative proposal, and I call on David Melding to move the motion.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf yw'r ddadl ar gynnig deddfwriaethol gan Aelod, ac rwy'n galw ar David Melding i wneud y cynnig.