English: - well, that bit of the M4 corridor in south-east Wales - representing it. Obviously, politics does impact upon these decisions, so how can we make sure, whoever the next First Minister is, that there are structures in place, particularly looking at the National Infrastructure Commission for Wales, to ensure that we get a better spread of investment across Wales? And finally, on the issue of the scale of ambition, it's great, by the way, to see the power there for the Welsh Government to raise bonds; I think we've actually called for that previously. But then the next question is, of course: what is the scale of our ambition in terms of the quantum? And there, Cabinet Secretary, you're absolutely right that there has been this historic opportunity with the low interest rates et cetera, and probably, we would say, a backlog of underinvestment in the past in the Welsh infrastructure. The WIIP was there to address that and to seize that opportunity, but yet, even if we take the figures that are in your statement - the £1 billion for the mutual investment model, the £1 billion in terms of the borrowing powers - that takes us up, in terms of financing on an annual basis, to about 1 per cent of the annual budget. The Scottish Government have a target of 5 per cent. And so, if we were to match their ambition in terms of our appetite for financing a capital programme on that scale, then we would be in a totally different situation, wouldn't we, in terms of the level of capital investment that we're currently able to finance. The 350-odd projects, the £42 billion - at the current rate, it will take 20 years, a generation, for us to actually work our way through the WIIP as a whole - there or thereabouts. Shouldn't we take this opportunity as we're reviewing the WIIP also to ask ourselves, 'Is the scale of our ambition equal to the opportunity and equal to the challenge that Wales currently faces in terms of its infrastructure?'
Welsh: - wel, y darn hwnnw o goridor yr M4 yn y de-ddwyrain - sy'n cynrychioli hynny. Yn amlwg, mae gwleidyddiaeth yn effeithio ar y penderfyniadau hyn, felly sut allwn ni wneud yn siŵr, pwy bynnag fydd Prif Weinidog nesaf Cymru, bod strwythurau ar waith, yn arbennig o ystyried Comisiwn Seilwaith Cenedlaethol Cymru, i sicrhau y cawn ni amrediad gwell o fuddsoddiad ledled Cymru? Ac yn olaf, ynglŷn â'r mater o ba mor uchelgeisiol ydym ni, mae'n wych, gyda llaw, gweld bod pŵer gan Lywodraeth Cymru i godi bondiau; rwy'n credu mewn gwirionedd ein bod ni wedi galw am hynny o'r blaen. Ond wedyn y cwestiwn nesaf yw, wrth gwrs: pa mor uchelgeisiol ydym ni o ran y swm? Ac ynghylch hynny, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, rydych chi'n hollol gywir y bu'r cyfle hanesyddol hwn gyda chyfraddau llog isel ac ati, a fwy na thebyg, dylem ddweud, ôl-groniad o danfuddsoddi yn y gorffennol yn seilwaith Cymru. Diben y Cynllun Buddsoddi yn Seilwaith Cymru oedd achub ar y cyfle hwnnw, ond eto, hyd yn oed os ydym ni'n ystyried y ffigurau hynny yn eich datganiad - yr £1 biliwn ar gyfer y buddsoddiad cydfuddiannol enghreifftiol, £1 biliwn o ran y pwerau benthyca - mae hynny'n gyfystyr, o ran ariannu ar sail flynyddol, â thua 1 y cant o'r gyllideb flynyddol. Mae gan Lywodraeth yr Alban darged o 5 y cant. Ac felly, pe baem ni yr un mor uchelgeisiol â nhw o ran ein harchwaeth i ariannu rhaglen gyfalaf ar y raddfa honno, yna byddem mewn sefyllfa hollol wahanol, yn byddem ni, o ran lefel y buddsoddiad cyfalaf y gallwn ni ei ariannu ar hyn o bryd. Yr oddeutu 350 o brosiectau, y £42 biliwn - ar y gyfradd bresennol, bydd yn cymryd 20 mlynedd, cenhedlaeth, i ni weithio mewn gwirionedd ein ffordd drwy'r Cynllun Buddsoddi - neu oddeutu hynny. Oni ddylem ni fanteisio ar y cyfle hwn fel rydym ni'n adolygu'r Cynllun Buddsoddi hefyd i ofyn i ni'n hunain, 'A yw maint ein huchelgais yn cyfateb i'r cyfle ac yn cyfateb i'r her sy'n wynebu Cymru ar hyn o bryd o ran ei seilwaith?'