English: Well, thank you for that, Minister. I would join you in paying tribute to the workers in the third sector and local authorities for all the work that they have done with this. And I'm glad that you have put the record straight. You can obviously see where we had got those figures from. But I do agree with the point that you made too that obviously one person going back to living on the streets is one person too many. With what you've just said, Minister, in terms of the incredibly complex needs that a number of the people that we're talking about will have, and the substantial amount of support that they need, obviously I would agree with that too, but that does make me question why they hadn't been provided with that support when they were housed. Now, I take on board, of course, what you've been saying about the incredibly complex situation that we have been facing, and none of us would underestimate that. But your Government is supposed to have committed to a housing first model, so surely that support should have been something that was taken into account. Now, looking at some of the cases, it's clear there's not been a level of understanding within some local authorities that homeless people are not a homogenous group, as you've just been saying, and that a solution for one person won't necessarily work for another. Minister, you've referred to some of this in your initial answer. We've had stories of people who've been housed together, including abuse victims who have been housed with people who have violent histories - one-size-fits-all approaches that often don't take into account individual needs. So, do you accept that far more work is needed to ensure that local authority staff are given a better understanding of homelessness, and that they receive training in how to deal with people who've experienced trauma, and that there's a recognition that providing a variety of types of accommodation, rather than one size fits all, is essential in solving the problem?
Welsh: Wel, diolch am hynny, Weinidog. Hoffwn ategu eich teyrnged i'r gweithwyr yn y trydydd sector ac awdurdodau lleol am yr holl waith y maent wedi'i wneud ar hyn. Ac rwy'n falch eich bod wedi egluro'r sefyllfa. Yn amlwg, gallwch weld o ble y cawsom y ffigurau hynny. Ond rwy'n cytuno â'r pwynt a wnaethoch hefyd ei bod yn amlwg fod un person sy'n dychwelyd i fyw ar y stryd yn un person yn ormod. Gyda'r hyn rydych newydd ei ddweud, Weinidog, o ran yr anghenion hynod gymhleth a fydd gan nifer o'r bobl rydym yn sôn amdanynt, a'r cymorth sylweddol sydd ei angen arnynt, yn amlwg byddwn yn cytuno â hynny hefyd, ond mae hynny'n gwneud i mi gwestiynu pam na chawsant y cymorth hwnnw pan oeddent yn cael eu cartrefu. Nawr, rwy'n derbyn, wrth gwrs, yr hyn rydych wedi bod yn ei ddweud am y sefyllfa hynod gymhleth rydym wedi bod yn ei hwynebu, ac ni fyddai'r un ohonom yn bychanu hynny. Ond mae eich Llywodraeth i fod wedi ymrwymo i fodel tai yn gyntaf, felly dylai'r cymorth hwnnw fod wedi cael ei ystyried. Nawr, wrth edrych ar rai o'r achosion, mae'n amlwg nad oes lefel o ddealltwriaeth wedi bod o fewn rhai awdurdodau lleol nad yw pobl ddigartref yn grŵp unffurf, fel rydych newydd fod yn ei ddweud, ac na fydd ateb i un person o reidrwydd yn gweithio i un arall. Weinidog, rydych wedi cyfeirio at rywfaint o hyn yn eich ateb cychwynnol. Rydym wedi cael straeon am bobl sydd wedi cael eu cartrefu gyda'i gilydd, gan gynnwys dioddefwyr camdriniaeth sydd wedi cael eu cartrefu gyda phobl sydd â hanesion treisgar - dulliau un ateb i bawb yn aml nad ydynt yn ystyried anghenion unigolion. Felly, a ydych yn derbyn bod angen llawer mwy o waith i sicrhau bod staff awdurdodau lleol yn cael gwell dealltwriaeth o ddigartrefedd, a'u bod yn cael hyfforddiant ar sut i ymdrin â phobl sydd wedi profi trawma, a chydnabyddiaeth bod darparu amrywiaeth o fathau o lety, yn hytrach nag un ateb i bawb, yn hanfodol i ddatrys y broblem?