English: Well, thank you for your supplementary. I certainly agree with you that it was disappointing that, at the Conservative Party conference, a statement was made that there would be no devolution of justice. This was before they'd even had an opportunity to read the document, to read the arguments that are set out within that document. I think that is a very disappointing approach, because it always seems to me it's important to consider the evidence before having a knee-jerk reaction. That being as it is, one of the issues of course in terms of the devolution of justice is that there are certain areas where there is ongoing work with the UK Government. And, of course, as you know, there are the Law Commission's proposals in respect of tribunals, which is an important element of our justice system, which will be the subject in due course of legislation. Knowing the cost of the justice system is actually very complex. It's one that would depend, really, I think, on negotiations with Government, negotiations over the transfer of responsibilities, what we mean by justice. We know that when the Thomas commission considered this, when they looked at all the aspects of justice, whether it be the tribunals, the areas of social justice that we're involved in, the areas of police and crime commissioners and our contributions to policing and so on, it was estimated at around £442 million. So, we already spend and contribute an enormous amount towards that. Considering the development of justice and considering how those negotiations will develop in due course - . And I agree with you that, even if it is not this Government that is agreeable to the devolution of justice, I'm fairly certain that it will certainly be on the agenda of the next Government to consider the devolution of justice, and certainly all the implications of that will be under consideration.
Welsh: Wel, diolch am eich cwestiwn atodol. Rwy'n sicr yn cytuno â chi ei bod yn siomedig fod datganiad wedi'i wneud yng nghynhadledd y Blaid Geidwadol na fyddai cyfiawnder yn cael ei ddatganoli. Roedd hyn cyn iddynt hyd yn oed gael cyfle i ddarllen y ddogfen, a darllen y dadleuon a nodir yn y ddogfen honno. Credaf fod hwnnw'n ffordd siomedig iawn o fynd ati, oherwydd mae bob amser yn ymddangos i mi ei bod yn bwysig ystyried y dystiolaeth cyn ymateb yn ddifeddwl. Fel ag y mae, un o'r problemau, wrth gwrs, mewn perthynas â datganoli cyfiawnder yw bod rhai meysydd lle mae gwaith yn mynd rhagddo gyda Llywodraeth y DU. Ac wrth gwrs, fel y gwyddoch, mae gan Gomisiwn y Gyfraith gynigion mewn perthynas â thribiwnlysoedd, sy'n elfen bwysig o'n system gyfiawnder, a fydd yn destun deddfwriaeth maes o law. Mae gwybod cost y system gyfiawnder yn gymhleth iawn mewn gwirionedd. Byddai'n dibynnu, rwy'n credu, ar drafodaethau gyda'r Llywodraeth, trafodaethau ynghylch trosglwyddo cyfrifoldebau, yr hyn a olygwn wrth gyfiawnder. Pan ystyriodd comisiwn Thomas hyn, pan edrychasant ar yr holl agweddau ar gyfiawnder, boed yn dribiwnlysoedd, yn feysydd cyfiawnder cymdeithasol yr ydym yn ymwneud â hwy, meysydd comisiynwyr yr heddlu a throseddu a'n cyfraniadau at blismona ac yn y blaen, gwyddom yr amcangyfrifwyd ei fod tua £442 miliwn. Felly, rydym eisoes yn gwario ac yn cyfrannu llawer iawn tuag at hynny. O ystyried datblygiad cyfiawnder ac o ystyried sut y bydd y trafodaethau hynny'n datblygu maes o law - . Ac rwy'n cytuno â chi, hyd yn oed os nad yw'r Llywodraeth hon yn cytuno y dylid datganoli cyfiawnder, rwy'n weddol sicr y bydd ar agenda'r Llywodraeth nesaf i ystyried datganoli cyfiawnder, ac yn sicr bydd holl oblygiadau hynny'n cael eu hystyried.