English: It's a pleasure to take part in this short debate, and I'll keep my comments relatively succinct. Just to reiterate the fact that myself and the Welsh Conservative group will be abstaining on today's motion. The Chair of the Finance Committee and the Member for South Wales East mentioned that a key word is 'tangibility', and any budgetary decision that's made has to be felt on the front line of the sectors, and it's mentioned within the supplementary budget about NHS training and workforce, so would the Minister be able to answer what specific training is being offered to the NHS workforce? Because, quite often, there are many sectors in the health and social care professions that are dying to know the details, and I think the health boards deserve to know and get specific direction on where they're going to train up these workforces, because a lot of professionals do actually feel sometimes disillusioned with the lack of training, and often that can be a key part of career development and also to expand a professional's knowledge. And also, Social Care Wales and CAFCASS funding, and what will this do to support healthy patient flow and discharge to social care settings in particular, because we often see cases of bedblocking, ambulance waiting times because the fact of the matter is that people being discharged from the other side of the sector can't actually be discharged to somewhere safe in the social care sector. So, what specifically will that funding do to support that issue? Just finally, in supporting children, you've previously said that you've wanted to abolish the private childcare provision that makes up, actually, 80 per cent of the sector. So, does that fund towards children support that ideation of an ideological vendetta against the private childcare providers, or does that actually defy it, Minister? I'd like you to answer those specific questions when you're closing the debate later on. Thank you.
Welsh: Mae'n bleser cymryd rhan yn y ddadl fer hon, a byddaf yn cadw fy sylwadau'n gymharol gryno. I ailadrodd y ffaith y byddaf i a grŵp y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig yn ymatal ar y cynnig heddiw. Fe wnaeth Cadeirydd y Pwyllgor Cyllid a'r Aelod dros ddwyrain y de sôn mai gair allweddol yw 'natur weladwy', ac mae'n rhaid i unrhyw benderfyniad cyllidebol sy'n cael ei wneud gael effaith ar reng flaen y sectorau, ac mae wedi ei grybwyll yn y gyllideb atodol am hyfforddiant a gweithlu'r GIG, felly a fyddai'r Gweinidog yn gallu ateb pa hyfforddiant penodol sy'n cael ei gynnig i weithlu'r GIG? Oherwydd, yn eithaf aml, mae llawer o sectorau yn y proffesiynau iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol sy'n torri eu boliau i wybod y manylion, ac rwy'n credu bod y byrddau iechyd yn haeddu gwybod a chael cyfeiriad penodol ynghylch ble maen nhw'n mynd i hyfforddi'r gweithluoedd hyn, oherwydd bod llawer o weithwyr proffesiynol yn teimlo'n siomedig weithiau gyda'r diffyg hyfforddiant, ac yn aml gall hynny fod yn rhan allweddol o ddatblygiad gyrfa a hefyd i ehangu gwybodaeth gweithiwr proffesiynol. A hefyd, cyllid Gofal Cymdeithasol Cymru a CAFCASS, a beth fydd hyn yn ei wneud i gefnogi llif cleifion iach a'u rhyddhau i leoliadau gofal cymdeithasol yn benodol, oherwydd rydym yn aml yn gweld achosion o flocio gwelyau, amseroedd aros ambiwlansys oherwydd y gwir amdani yw na all pobl sy'n cael eu rhyddhau o ochr arall y sector gael eu rhyddhau i rywle diogel yn y sector gofal cymdeithasol. Felly, beth yn benodol fydd yr arian hwnnw'n ei wneud i gefnogi'r mater hwn? Yn olaf, o ran cefnogi plant, rydych chi wedi dweud o'r blaen eich bod chi wedi dymuno diddymu'r ddarpariaeth gofal plant preifat sydd, mewn gwirionedd, yn ffurfio 80 y cant o'r sector. Felly, a yw'r gronfa honno tuag at blant yn cefnogi gwaith o wireddu'r fendeta ideolegol yn erbyn y darparwyr gofal plant preifat, neu a yw hynny'n ei herio mewn gwirionedd, Gweinidog? Hoffwn i chi ateb y cwestiynau penodol hynny pan fyddwch chi'n cau'r ddadl yn nes ymlaen. Diolch.