techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, the Member is right. The UK Government seems to be taking a deliberate approach to undermine the kind of planned, strategic, co-developed approach to regional development that we have favoured here in Wales in favour, effectively, of political discretion. And we've seen the impact of that in the towns fund in England, which has been severely criticised for a range of shortcomings by the Public Accounts Committee in Parliament, whether it's about lack of transparency or political bias or the lack of capacity for delivery. All of these challenges fall at the door of the UK Government in terms of its approach to the shared prosperity fund, and, I dare say, what it has called the levelling up fund as well, in due course. The proposals, in the way that the Member's question implies, have not been developed with Welsh stakeholders, not reflecting the interests of Welsh businesses and Welsh communities, either on a Wales-wide basis or a regional basis. They lack transparency. They lack the capability of being integrated with other sources of funding, and I hope very much that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, the UK Government department responsible for the terrible experience of managing the towns fund, will not replicate the arrangements in relation to these funds. At the end of the day, the reason we call for these to be dealt with in accordance with the devolution settlement isn't simply a constitutional argument; it is because it leads to better outcomes, fairer to Wales, and better reflecting the priorities of Welsh businesses, Welsh communities and Welsh people.
Welsh: Wel, mae'r Aelod yn iawn. Mae'n ymddangos bod Llywodraeth y DU yn mynd ati'n fwriadol i danseilio'r math o ddull cynlluniedig, strategol, wedi'i gyd-ddatblygu o weithredu datblygu rhanbarthol a ffafriwyd gennym yma yng Nghymru o blaid disgresiwn gwleidyddol i bob pwrpas. Ac rydym wedi gweld effaith hynny yng nghronfa'r trefi yn Lloegr, sydd wedi cael ei beirniadu'n llym am amrywiaeth o ddiffygion gan y Pwyllgor Cyfrifon Cyhoeddus yn y Senedd, boed yn ddiffyg tryloywder neu ragfarn wleidyddol neu ddiffyg gallu i gyflawni. Llywodraeth y DU sy'n gyfrifol am yr holl heriau hyn yn sgil ei dull o weithredu'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin, a, mentraf ddweud, yr hyn y mae wedi'i galw'n gronfa codi'r gwastad hefyd, maes o law. Nid yw'r cynigion, yn y ffordd y mae cwestiwn yr Aelod yn awgrymu, wedi'u datblygu gyda rhanddeiliaid o Gymru, nac yn adlewyrchu buddiannau busnesau Cymru a chymunedau Cymru, naill ai ledled Cymru neu ar sail ranbarthol. Maent yn brin o dryloywder. Nid oes modd eu hintegreiddio â ffynonellau cyllid eraill, ac rwy'n gobeithio'n fawr na fydd y Weinyddiaeth Tai, Cymunedau a Llywodraeth Leol, adran Llywodraeth y DU sy'n gyfrifol am y profiad ofnadwy o reoli'r gronfa drefi, yn dilyn yr un trefniadau gyda'r cronfeydd hyn. Yn y pen draw, nid dadl gyfansoddiadol syml yw'r rheswm pam ein bod yn galw am ymdrin â'r rhain yn unol â'r setliad datganoli, ond yn hytrach, am fod hynny'n arwain at ganlyniadau gwell, tecach i Gymru, ac yn adlewyrchu blaenoriaethau busnesau Cymru, cymunedau Cymru a phobl Cymru yn well.
English: Thank you for that response. There is growing concern about the attitude being shown by the Tory UK Government Minister on the issue of the £4.8 billion to drive regeneration across the UK that will be administered by Whitehall. Minister, will the Welsh Labour Government continue to forcefully stand up for Welsh devolution, the importance of the democratic body that is Senedd Cymru, Welsh Parliament, and that we as directly elected politicians in Wales must have oversight of how moneys earmarked for Wales are spent to benefit the Welsh populace? The global pandemic has vividly demonstrated the dangerous consequences of endemic poverty that exists across the UK - endemic poverty that is the result of savage, ideological Conservative Party policies since Thatcherism devastated communities across Wales after 1979. Minister, what are the dangers you perceive for Wales in the path that the UK Tory Government is taking for Wales?
Welsh: Diolch ichi am yr ymateb hwnnw. Mae pryder cynyddol ynglŷn ag agwedd Gweinidog Torïaidd Llywodraeth y DU tuag at fater y £4.8 biliwn i sbarduno adfywiad ledled y DU a weinyddir gan Whitehall. Weinidog, a wnaiff Llywodraeth Lafur Cymru barhau i sefyll yn rymus dros ddatganoli yng Nghymru, pwysigrwydd Senedd Cymru fel corff democrataidd, ac mai ni fel gwleidyddion a etholwyd yn uniongyrchol yng Nghymru a ddylai oruchwylio sut y caiff arian a glustnodwyd ar gyfer Cymru ei wario er budd pobl Cymru? Mae'r pandemig byd-eang wedi dangos yn glir beth yw canlyniadau peryglus y tlodi endemig sy'n bodoli ledled y DU - tlodi endemig sy'n ganlyniad i bolisïau creulon, ideolegol y Blaid Geidwadol ers i Thatcheriaeth ddinistrio cymunedau ledled Cymru ar ôl 1979. Weinidog, beth yw'r peryglon a welwch i Gymru ar y llwybr y mae Llywodraeth Dorïaidd y DU yn ei ddilyn ar gyfer Cymru?
English: May I thank Rhianon Passmore for that question? She will recall, of course, as I do, that, when the spending review happened in November, a Barnett consequential was promised to Wales in relation to the levelling-up fund, so that it could be administered in the way that she describes, in accordance with the democratic accountability of the Welsh Government to this Senedd. That is not what has happened, and, in the way that she suggests, this is entirely in defiance of the constitutional arrangements of the devolution settlement, but this has a practical consequence in the lives of people in Wales. The Welsh Government has worked very collaboratively with the third sector, private sector, businesses, universities, local government and others right across Wales to develop an approach that works for Wales, and that, we think, is the better way forward, not a centralised discretionary fund. The sorts of priorities that people right across Wales have demonstrated they wish to see are support for competitive business, addressing economic inequalities, addressing the transition to a zero-carbon economy, and healthier, fairer and more sustainable communities. That is the kind of programme, devolved to the regions in Wales, that we think is in the best interests of Wales, and we call on the UK Government to respect that co-working across Wales and make sure funds are available through that framework.
Welsh: A gaf fi ddiolch i Rhianon Passmore am y cwestiwn hwnnw? Fe fydd yn cofio, wrth gwrs, fel finnau, pan ddigwyddodd yr adolygiad o wariant ym mis Tachwedd, fod swm canlyniadol Barnett wedi'i addo i Gymru mewn perthynas â'r gronfa codi'r gwastad, fel y gellid ei gweinyddu yn y ffordd y mae hi'n ei disgrifio, yn unol ag atebolrwydd democrataidd Llywodraeth Cymru i'r Senedd hon. Nid dyna sydd wedi digwydd, ac yn y ffordd y mae hi'n awgrymu, mae hyn yn gwbl groes i drefniadau cyfansoddiadol y setliad datganoli, ond mae i hyn ganlyniad ymarferol ym mywydau pobl yng Nghymru. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi cydweithio'n dda iawn â'r trydydd sector, y sector preifat, busnesau, prifysgolion, llywodraeth leol ac eraill ledled Cymru i ddatblygu dull sy'n gweithio i Gymru, ac yn ein barn ni, dyna'r ffordd orau ymlaen, nid cronfa ddewisol ganolog. Y mathau o flaenoriaethau y mae pobl ledled Cymru wedi dangos eu bod am eu gweld yw cymorth i fusnesau cystadleuol, mynd i'r afael ag anghydraddoldebau economaidd, mynd i'r afael â'r newid i economi ddi-garbon, a chymunedau iachach, tecach a mwy cynaliadwy. Dyna'r math o raglen, wedi'i datganoli i'r rhanbarthau yng Nghymru, y credwn ei bod er lles gorau Cymru, a galwn ar Lywodraeth y DU i barchu'r cydweithio hwnnw ledled Cymru a sicrhau bod arian ar gael drwy'r fframwaith hwnnw.
English: [ Inaudible.] - Treasury funding for the UK shared prosperity fund initially announced was only for pilot programmes, and it was made clear from the outset that ramped up funding would follow. As the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Wales said in the House of Commons last month: 'We have already made it very clear and demonstrated that the amount of money that is going to be spent in Wales when the SPF comes in will be identical to or higher than the amount of money that was spent in Wales that came from the European Union.' He also stated in the Commons, on the record, that the UK Government 'will continue to engage with the Welsh Government as we develop the fund's investment framework for publication.' What stage, therefore, has its engagement actually now reached? And given the news that the shared prosperity fund will also work directly with Welsh councils, which are understood to have welcomed this, what engagement are you having with them about this?
Welsh: [ Anghlywadwy.] - ar gyfer rhaglenni peilot yn unig y rhoddwyd cyllid y Trysorlys a gyhoeddwyd yn wreiddiol ar gyfer cronfa ffyniant gyffredin y DU, a nodwyd yn glir o'r cychwyn cyntaf y byddai mwy o gyllid i ddilyn. Fel y dywedodd Is-ysgrifennydd Gwladol Seneddol Cymru yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin fis diwethaf: Rydym eisoes wedi'i gwneud yn glir iawn ac wedi dangos y bydd y swm o arian a gaiff ei wario yng Nghymru pan ddaw'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin i fodolaeth yn union yr un fath â'r swm o arian a gâi ei wario yng Nghymru o'r Undeb Ewropeaidd, neu fwy na hynny. Mae wedi'i gofnodi'n dweud yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin hefyd y bydd Llywodraeth y DU yn parhau i ymgysylltu â Llywodraeth Cymru wrth i ni ddatblygu fframwaith buddsoddi'r gronfa ar gyfer ei gyhoeddi. Pa gam, felly, y mae ei hymgysylltiad wedi'i gyrraedd erbyn hyn? Ac o ystyried y newyddion y bydd y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin hefyd yn gweithio'n uniongyrchol gyda chynghorau Cymru, y deellir eu bod wedi croesawu hyn, pa ymgysylltiad sydd rhyngoch a hwy ynglŷn â hyn?
English: I thank the Member for giving me another opportunity to describe the shortcomings of the fund, but he describes a continuation of engagement as though there had been material engagement. The whole point of this process is that there has been none. And when you ask - . When the Member asks me what we will do with Welsh local government, we will continue the collaborative partnership working that has led to the design of the framework, which has not been characterised in the approach of the UK Government. And I am bound to say to him that he seems remarkably relaxed about Wales losing an entire year's worth of funding from the shared prosperity fund, and if he thinks that is an acceptable outcome to this process, I fundamentally disagree with him, and his assurance and his reliance on unspecific blandishments about future courses of action I do not think reflect the interests of people in Wales.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am roi cyfle arall imi ddisgrifio diffygion y gronfa, ond mae'n disgrifio parhad ymgysylltiad fel pe bai ymgysylltu o sylwedd wedi bod. Holl bwynt y broses hon yw na fu unrhyw ymgysylltiad o'r fath. A phan ofynnwch - . Pan fo'r Aelod yn gofyn imi beth a wnawn gyda llywodraeth leol yng Nghymru, byddwn yn parhau â'r gwaith partneriaeth cydweithredol sydd wedi arwain at gynllunio'r fframwaith, rhywbeth nad yw'n nodwedd o ymagwedd Llywodraeth y DU. Ac mae'n rhaid imi ddweud wrtho ei fod i'w weld yn hynod o ddigyffro ynglŷn â Chymru'n colli gwerth blwyddyn gyfan o gyllid o'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin, ac os yw'n credu bod hynny'n ganlyniad derbyniol i'r broses hon, rwy'n anghytuno'n sylfaenol ag ef, ac nid wyf yn credu bod ei sicrwydd a'i ddibyniaeth ar weniaith amhenodol ynglŷn â chamau gweithredu yn y dyfodol yn adlewyrchu buddiannau pobl yng Nghymru.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. Counsel General, I'm sure you'd agree with me that we do need to turbo charge post-Brexit economic growth in Wales. I'm aware that the UK Government is working collaboratively with devolved administrations to establish at least one free port in each nation of the UK. Here, in north Wales, of course, we are fortunate to have Virginia Crosbie, Welsh Conservative MP for Ynys Môn, heading up the Anglesey Freeport Bidding Consortium, alongside M-SParc, Bangor University, Stena Line, Anglesey County Council and the North Wales Economic Ambition Board. As the only bid in Wales to include an university, the free port could attract major new employers, bringing permanent employment to boost the supply chain across the whole region. It is clear, from your 'End of Transition Action Plan 2020', however, that the Welsh Government has been working with ports and the relevant local authorities to consider the needs of individual ports. So, would you put on record that you fully support Holyhead as the lead candidate to be a free port in Wales as a means of posting the port post Brexit?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Gwnsler Cyffredinol, rwy'n siŵr y byddech yn cytuno â mi fod angen i ni roi hwb i dwf economaidd ôl-Brexit yng Nghymru. Rwy'n ymwybodol fod Llywodraeth y DU yn cydweithio â'r gweinyddiaethau datganoledig i sefydlu o leiaf un porthladd rhydd ym mhob gwlad yn y DU. Yma, yng ngogledd Cymru wrth gwrs, rydym yn ffodus o gael Virginia Crosbie, AS ar ran y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig dros Ynys Môn, yn arwain Consortiwm Cais Porthladd Rhydd Ynys Môn, ochr yn ochr ag M-SParc, Prifysgol Bangor, Stena Line, Cyngor Sir Ynys Môn a Bwrdd Uchelgais Economaidd Gogledd Cymru. Fel yr unig gais yng Nghymru i gynnwys prifysgol, gallai'r porthladd rhydd ddenu cyflogwyr newydd mawr, gan ddod â chyflogaeth barhaol i hybu'r gadwyn gyflenwi ar draws y rhanbarth cyfan. Mae'n amlwg, o'ch 'Cynllun Gweithredu Diwedd y Cyfnod Pontio 2020', fodd bynnag, fod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi bod yn gweithio gyda phorthladdoedd a'r awdurdodau lleol perthnasol i ystyried anghenion porthladdoedd unigol. Felly, a fyddech yn cofnodi eich bod yn llwyr gefnogi Caergybi fel y prif ymgeisydd i fod yn borthladd rhydd yng Nghymru fel ffordd o ddefnyddio'r porthladd ar ôl Brexit?
English: Well, I'm grateful to Janet Finch-Saunders for identifying the needs of ports, and the economies near to ports, as being in need of particular support as a consequence of leaving the European Union. That is certainly the case, and our approach as a Government very much is the one that she described in her question, which is to work with ports, port authorities, hauliers and businesses and the Governments, of course, to advance their interests. I wonder whether she would agree with me that if the UK Government is seeking to support the development of a free port in Wales, in providing funding for that, that ought not to be based on a Barnett consequential, which would deliver around 5 per cent of the overall cost, but on the basis of a much more significant investment of around 10 per cent, which is about one port out of the UK Government's aim of 10 across the UK. So, I would welcome her confirmation to me that she regards a Barnett consequential approach as inadequate to take forward the kind of proposal that she supports.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n ddiolchgar i Janet Finch-Saunders am nodi anghenion porthladdoedd, a'r economïau sy'n agos at borthladdoedd, fel rhai sydd angen cymorth penodol o ganlyniad i adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd. Mae hynny'n sicr yn wir, ac yn sicr ddigon, ein dull gweithredu fel Llywodraeth yw'r un a ddisgrifiodd yn ei chwestiwn, sef gweithio gyda phorthladdoedd, awdurdodau porthladdoedd, cludwyr a busnesau a'r Llywodraethau, wrth gwrs, i hyrwyddo eu buddiannau. Os yw Llywodraeth y DU yn ceisio cefnogi datblygiad porthladd rhydd yng Nghymru, wrth ddarparu cyllid ar gyfer hynny, tybed a yw'n cytuno na ddylai hynny fod yn seiliedig ar swm canlyniadol Barnett, a fyddai'n sicrhau tua 5 y cant o gyfanswm y gost, ond ar sail buddsoddiad llawer mwy sylweddol o tua 10 y cant, sef tua un porthladd allan o nod Llywodraeth y DU o 10 ledled y DU. Felly, byddwn yn falch pe bai'n cadarnhau ei bod o'r farn bod gweithredu ar sail swm canlyniadol Barnett yn annigonol ar gyfer datblygu'r math o gynnig y mae'n ei gefnogi.
English: Counsel General, thank you, but I have to disagree with you at this point because I was actually quite happy to read today that £8 million will be coming forward to Wales to help with our free-port initiative. Now, Ynys Môn would be the ideal place because it has one of the lowest GVAs in Wales - £1,050 compared with £11,769 for Cardiff. And too often here, as a north Wales elected Member, I am fed up with people worried about the north-south divide. Now, staying with ports, you may recall that you stated the following in your end of transition action plan: 'We are working to ensure we minimise any possible disruption to the transport network, the ports and local communities in Wales.' Now, we're both aware of the challenges facing our shellfish sector and the £23 million the UK Government has already made available to back our seafood exporters. But we believe that you could be doing more to minimise this disruption. Some Welsh fishers are spending £15,000 on a refrigerated van to transport live scallops all the way to Plymouth. The Welsh Government could stop all of that by taking one decisive step: introduce financial incentives to develop purification plants here in north Wales. So, will you look to work with Welsh fishers who are looking for that support and work with the UK Government to support the shellfish sector post Brexit by quickly developing purification plants near our Welsh ports?
Welsh: Gwnsler Cyffredinol, diolch, ond rhaid imi anghytuno â chi ar y pwynt hwn oherwydd roeddwn yn hapus i ddarllen heddiw mewn gwirionedd y bydd £8 miliwn yn dod i Gymru i helpu gyda'n menter porthladd rhydd. Nawr, Ynys Môn fyddai'r lle delfrydol gan fod ganddi un o'r gwerthoedd ychwanegol gros isaf yng Nghymru - £1,050 o'i gymharu ag £11,769 yng Nghaerdydd. Ac yn rhy aml yma, fel Aelod etholedig yng ngogledd Cymru, rwyf wedi cael llond bol ar bobl sy'n poeni am y rhaniad rhwng y gogledd a'r de. Nawr, gan aros gyda phorthladdoedd, efallai y cofiwch ichi ddatgan y canlynol yn eich cynllun gweithredu diwedd y cyfnod pontio: 'Rydym yn gweithio i sicrhau cyn lleied o amharu â phosibl ar y rhwydwaith trafnidiaeth, y porthladdoedd a'r cymunedau lleol yng Nghymru.' Nawr, rydym ein dau'n ymwybodol o'r heriau sy'n wynebu ein sector pysgod cregyn a'r £23 miliwn y mae Llywodraeth y DU eisoes wedi'i ddarparu i gefnogi ein hallforwyr bwyd môr. Ond credwn y gallech fod yn gwneud mwy i leihau'r tarfu hwn. Mae rhai pysgotwyr o Gymry yn gwario £15,000 ar fan oergell i gludo cregyn bylchog byw yr holl ffordd i Plymouth. Gallai Llywodraeth Cymru atal hynny i gyd drwy gymryd un cam pendant: cyflwyno cymhellion ariannol i ddatblygu gweithfeydd puro yma yng ngogledd Cymru. Felly, a wnewch chi weithio gyda physgotwyr Cymru sy'n chwilio am y gefnogaeth honno a gweithio gyda Llywodraeth y DU i gefnogi'r sector pysgod cregyn ar ôl Brexit drwy fynd ati'n gyflym i ddatblygu gweithfeydd puro ger ein porthladdoedd yng Nghymru?
English: Well, I'm pleased that she stayed on the theme of ports. I didn't quite get from her rationale why she thought it would be appropriate that Welsh ports ought to be funded at a lower rate than ports in other parts of the UK, so I will ask her, please, if she could help me with that when she asks her next question. I do think it's an important part of standing up for the Welsh ports. On the question of the shellfish exports, as she will know from our previous exchanges in relation to this, the Welsh Government has always stood up for the interests of fishers and has advocated, therefore, a very different approach than the one that, unfortunately, the UK Government chose to take in its negotiations. And I'm afraid the challenges that face the sector in Wales, which are very significant, are ones that are directly referable to the choices made by the UK Government in those negotiations. And I don't think it serves anyone really to seek to obfuscate that reality. What we will do as a Government is to continue our support for the sector in any way that we can, but the responsibility for changing the landscape here in a way that can genuinely support the shellfish and fisheries sector at large lies at the door of the UK Government. We will continue to be co-operative and work in a collegiate way with them in the interest of all sectors in Wales that have been damaged by the kind of negotiation that the UK Government has pursued, but, ultimately, some of these things lie simply in the hands of the UK Government and they need to act in response.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n falch ei bod wedi aros gyda thema porthladdoedd. Ni ddeallais o'i rhesymeg pam ei bod yn credu y byddai'n briodol i borthladdoedd Cymru gael eu hariannu ar gyfradd is na phorthladdoedd mewn rhannau eraill o'r DU, felly rwyf am ofyn iddi fy helpu gyda hynny pan fydd yn gofyn ei chwestiwn nesaf. Rwy'n credu ei fod yn rhan bwysig o sefyll dros borthladdoedd Cymru. O ran allforion pysgod cregyn, fel y gŵyr o'n trafodaethau blaenorol mewn perthynas â hyn, mae Llywodraeth Cymru bob amser wedi sefyll dros fuddiannau pysgotwyr ac felly wedi argymell dull gwahanol iawn o weithredu i'r un y dewisodd Llywodraeth y DU ei fabwysiadu yn ei negodiadau, yn anffodus. Ac rwy'n ofni bod yr heriau sylweddol iawn sy'n wynebu'r sector yng Nghymru yn rhai y gellir eu olrhain yn uniongyrchol i'r dewisiadau a wnaed gan Lywodraeth y DU yn y negodiadau hynny. Ac nid wyf yn credu bod ceisio celu'r realiti hwnnw'n helpu neb mewn gwirionedd. Yr hyn y byddwn yn ei wneud fel Llywodraeth yw parhau â'n cefnogaeth i'r sector mewn unrhyw ffordd y gallwn, ond cyfrifoldeb Llywodraeth y DU yw newid y dirwedd yma mewn ffordd a all gefnogi'r sector pysgod cregyn a physgodfeydd yn gyffredinol. Byddwn yn parhau i fod yn gydweithredol a gweithio ar y cyd â hwy er budd pob sector yng Nghymru sydd wedi'u difrodi gan y math o negodi a wnaed gan Lywodraeth y DU, ond yn y pen draw, mae rhai o'r pethau hyn yn nwylo Llywodraeth y DU ac mae angen iddynt weithredu mewn ymateb i hynny.
English: I'm not sure I recognise the worldview of the Member, where Welsh people should be grateful for having investment made out of their own taxes in Wales, but it is, I suppose, a worldview. My preferred approach is to make sure that two things happen. Firstly, in relation to areas that are not devolved, that the UK Government stops short-changing Wales, so whether that's in terms of energy infrastructure or digital infrastructure or rail infrastructure, it would be good if the UK Government actually invested on a comparable basis in Wales. In relation to matters that are devolved, I'm afraid, as I mentioned earlier, these sums of money are small sums of money, and they are not being deployed in a way that reflects the interests of Wales. I'm not making a constitutional point, as it happens; I'm making a point about effective investment in the Welsh economy, and that is the work that we've been doing as a Welsh Government with Welsh businesses, and I'm afraid none of the work that the UK Government has done has benefited from that. I welcome investment in Wales. I would welcome considerably more investment from the UK Government in Wales, deployed on reserved areas more effectively by them and on devolved areas by the Welsh Government.
Welsh: Nid wyf yn siŵr fy mod yn cydnabod bydolwg yr Aelod, lle dylai pobl Cymru fod yn ddiolchgar am gael buddsoddiad o'u trethi eu hunain yng Nghymru, ond mae'n debyg ei bod hi'n fydolwg. Mae'n well gennyf fi sicrhau bod dau beth yn digwydd. Yn gyntaf, ar feysydd nad ydynt wedi'u datganoli, fod Llywodraeth y DU yn rhoi'r gorau i wneud cam â Chymru, felly boed yn seilwaith ynni neu seilwaith digidol neu seilwaith rheilffyrdd, byddai'n dda pe bai Llywodraeth y DU yn buddsoddi ar sail gymaradwy yng Nghymru. Ar faterion sydd wedi'u datganoli, fel y soniais yn gynharach, mae arnaf ofn mai symiau bach o arian yw'r rhain, ac nid ydynt yn cael eu defnyddio mewn ffordd sy'n adlewyrchu buddiannau Cymru. Nid gwneud pwynt cyfansoddiadol rwyf i, fel mae'n digwydd; rwy'n gwneud pwynt am fuddsoddi effeithiol yn economi Cymru, a dyna'r gwaith rydym wedi bod yn ei wneud fel Llywodraeth Cymru gyda busnesau Cymru, ac mae arnaf ofn nad oes dim o'r gwaith y mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi'i wneud wedi elwa o hynny. Rwy'n croesawu buddsoddiad yng Nghymru. Byddwn yn croesawu llawer mwy o fuddsoddiad gan Lywodraeth y DU yng Nghymru, i'w ddefnyddio ar feysydd a gadwyd yn ôl yn fwy effeithiol ganddynt ac ar feysydd datganoledig gan Lywodraeth Cymru.