English: First Minister, this Government's announcement of Wales as the first nation of sanctuary and as a supersponsor created headlines as you demonstrated that Wales was ready and willing to help in doing more than its fair share in aiding people who were fleeing conflict and persecution. However, sadly, it does now seem that Wales was ill prepared for the overwhelming response, and the system has become clogged while it is dealing with a considerable backlog, hence the repeated pausing of the supersponsor scheme. From what I understand, of the 2,956 sponsored and who have already arrived in Wales from Ukraine, only 698 have moved on from their initial temporary accommodation, which, as you know, poses a significant issue in helping the other 1,640 refugees that the Welsh Government has agreed to sponsor and are awaiting to arrive. In trying to rectify the situation, the Welsh Government has now warned that if refugees continue to decline alternative options, it will deduct up to £37 per week from their universal credit payments in order to cover the costs of maintaining them in their temporary accommodation. First Minister, I'm sure that you agree with me that it sounds very strange that refugees would be declining permanent housing options in favour of living in temporary accommodation, and I'm keen to ascertain why. Is it because the quality of housing is not good enough, or is it because local authorities simply do not have enough suitable accommodation available to offer to them? With this in mind, what assessment has the Welsh Government done of the housing stock that has been made available to refugees? Thank you.
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, fe wnaeth cyhoeddiad y Llywodraeth hon o Gymru fel y genedl noddfa gyntaf ac fel uwch-noddwr greu penawdau wrth i chi ddangos bod Cymru yn fodlon ac yn barod i helpu i wneud mwy na'i chyfran deg o ran cynorthwyo pobl a oedd yn ffoi rhag gwrthdaro ac erledigaeth. Fodd bynnag, yn anffodus, mae'n ymddangos bellach bod Cymru wedi ei pharatoi'n wael ar gyfer yr ymateb enfawr, ac mae'r system wedi cael ei thagu tra'i bod yn ymdrin ag ôl-groniad sylweddol, gan arwain at oedi'r cynllun uwch-noddwr dro ar ôl tro. O'r hyn yr wyf i'n ei ddeall, o'r 2,956 a noddwyd ac sydd eisoes wedi cyrraedd Cymru o Wcráin, dim ond 698 sydd wedi symud ymlaen o'u llety dros dro cychwynnol, sydd, fel y gwyddoch chi, yn achosi problem sylweddol o ran helpu'r 1,640 o ffoaduriaid eraill y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi cytuno i'w noddi ac sy'n aros i gyrraedd. Wrth geisio unioni'r sefyllfa, mae Llywodraeth Cymru bellach wedi rhybuddio os bydd ffoaduriaid yn parhau i wrthod opsiynau eraill y bydd yn didynnu hyd at £37 yr wythnos o'u taliadau credyd cynhwysol er mwyn talu costau eu cadw yn eu llety dros dro. Prif Weinidog, rwy'n siŵr eich bod chi'n cytuno â mi ei bod hi'n swnio'n rhyfedd iawn y byddai ffoaduriaid yn gwrthod opsiynau tai parhaol o blaid byw mewn llety dros dro, ac rwy'n awyddus i ganfod pam. A yw oherwydd nad yw ansawdd y tai yn ddigon da, neu a yw oherwydd nad oes gan awdurdodau lleol ddigon o lety addas ar gael i'w gynnig iddyn nhw? Gyda hyn mewn golwg, pa asesiad mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ei wneud o'r stoc dai a wnaed ar gael i ffoaduriaid? Diolch.