English: That's why we've changed our arrangements during this part year. There is far more monitoring of enforcement steps. Truth be told, in the past there were circumstances where investigations were carried out time and time again for the same kinds of problems, and if enforcement steps had been put in place in the first instance, then the second case shouldn't have arisen. That was a cause for concern. It also created frustrations for complainants, where they had to return to us time and time again to make the same complaints. So, now I am quite confident that we have a firm grip on the enforcement that we put in place. If there is any perception that enforcement isn't effective, then I have scope to open further investigations. And I think what's happening now is that, in the vast majority of cases, we are entirely happy with the efficacy of the enforcement steps and that they've addressed the problems, but there are one or two organisations where there are still questions arising as to their response to enforcement after investigation. I think we are now more robust in terms of our enforcement actions. But, if we are more robust and there is still slippage within some of these organisations, then of course there is scope - and the Measure does say that it's only in serious cases - for us to take further steps. The more time that passes and the more cases that do emerge in certain organisations that are failing to respond to standards, then the easier it is for us to come to the conclusion that there's a serious case where further action is required. That might be a civil penalty or a referral to county court.
Welsh: Dyna pam rydyn ni wedi newid ein trefniadau yn ystod y flwyddyn ddiwethaf yma. Mae yna lawer iawn mwy o fonitro o ran y camau gorfodi. I ddweud y gwir, yn y gorffennol mi oedd yna sefyllfaoedd lle mi oedd yna ymchwiliadau dro ar ôl tro i'r un mathau o fethiannau, ac os byddai'r camau gorfodi wedi cael eu gweithredu yn y lle cyntaf, dylai'r ail achos ddim fod wedi gorfod codi. Felly, mi oedd hynny'n destun pryder. Mi oedd hefyd, dwi'n meddwl, yn creu rhwystredigaeth o ran achwynwyr, lle'r oedd yn rhaid iddyn nhw ddod yn ôl atom ni dro ar ôl tro i gwyno am yn union yr un pethau. Felly, erbyn hyn, dwi'n eithaf ffyddiog bod yna afael cadarn ar y camau gorfodi sydd yn cael eu gosod. Os oes yna unrhyw gred bod camau gorfodi ddim yn cael eu gweithredu, mae yna le inni agor ymchwiliad pellach. Dwi'n meddwl beth sydd yn digwydd erbyn hyn ydy, yn y mwyafrif llethol o achosion, rydyn ni'n gwbl fodlon efo effeithiolrwydd y camau gorfodi a bod y rheini wedi mynd i'r afael efo'r methiannau, ond mae yna un neu ddau sefydliad lle mae cwestiynau yn dal i godi o ran eu hymwneud nhw â'r camau gorfodi ar ôl ymchwilio. Ac erbyn hyn, dwi'n meddwl rydym ni'n fwy cadarn o ran y camau gweithredu. Ond, os ydyn ni'n fwy cadarn ac mae yna dal lithriad mewn rhai o'r sefydliadau yma, wrth gwrs, mae yna le - ac mae'r Mesur yn dweud ond o fewn achosion difrifol - inni gymryd camau pellach. A'r mwy o amser sydd yn mynd heibio a'r mwy o achosion sydd yna o fewn rhai sefydliadau sydd yn methu ag ymwneud â'r safonau, y mwyaf syml ydy o i ni ddod i'r casgliad bod hwn yn achos difrifol a bydd yn rhaid i ni weithredu ymhellach, bydded hynny drwy gosb sifil neu gyfeiriad at lys sirol.