English: There are elements in the statement on the legislative programme that the First Minister delivered this afternoon that are to be welcomed. We've already declared our support for the principle of embracing the social partnership model that will be attached to the Bill that the First Minister has referred to. We also welcome the move towards reregulation of the bus sector. We agree with the analysis in terms of the damage done by deregulation during the 1980s, and the shift in the other direction I think is a step forward. But may I ask, as this sector is one that is going through great and very challenging restructuring at the moment, for numerous reasons, what work has the Welsh Government done and what work is the Welsh Government doing to ensure that we aren't simply waiting for those statutory powers or legislative powers? For example, I raised the issue of First Cymru with the First Minister a few weeks ago, and the opportunity - it's a threat, but it's also perhaps an opportunity - for us to ensure that we don't see an erosion of services across large parts of the south-west of Wales, and across Wales as a whole. He did mention that he would have a word with his Minister for local government in order to have a discussion with the city of Swansea in the first instance. In terms of taxis, I think it is a sector - . I think the First Minister in his statement said that it's a sector that is going through even more of a change, because of the challenges of the gig economy and so on, and perhaps that's the driver for the ideas that have emerged from various stakeholders in this area. I am disappointed that we are delaying this, because this landscape is going to look very different in two or three years. It looked very different two or three years ago. So, can we afford to not take this opportunity to ensure that we place that sector on firm, robust ground? There are things to be welcomed in terms of the legislation that's been deferred. We welcome the decision to pause the agriculture Bill. That's what we've consistently said in Plaid Cymru, and I think that gives us an opportunity to weight up and to develop a framework that will provide a foundation for the long-term future. There are some things missing. I can't see any reference, for example, to a clean air Act. I haven't read the First Minister's manifesto for the leadership of the Labour Party from cover to cover, but I do think that was an element of the programme that you had presented - that is, an Act that would, for example, give you a statutory right to breathe, and would place a responsibility or put WHO guidance on some sort of statutory basis, and so on. And, of course, we know that there is a huge problem across Wales and this is an area where we do need to see progress. I would still urge the Government to reconsider not legislating now on this issue. You had also mentioned, or in fact you had committed to extending the smoking ban, if I remember rightly, to open air areas in town and city centres. Is that still your Government's intention, and when do you intend to legislate in that regard? In terms of TERCW - I'm not sure what the Welsh acronym for that is yet - but I do think it's true that this body will not only be responsible for tertiary education and research, but it will also be responsible for innovation in its broader sense. And if memory serves me, I think the intention is to create some sub-committee that will be specifically responsible for innovation and research. Isn't there a risk, First Minister, in that regard, because innovation of course relies upon research from the HE sector, and so on, but that only represents one aspect of innovation? There is also the business dimension, which is crucially important, and there was a recommendation made by Professor Kevin Morgan, who is a global specialist in innovation, that we should rather create a national innovation body on the Scandinavian model. That's not what's entailed in the recommendations that you're taking forward, but is that still part of the vision for the legislation that you are to introduce? Finally, there is a reference in your statement towards legislative constraints. So, what exactly are those constraints? Is it the number of Members, the time available during the working week in the Senedd, which takes us back to the debate that we had last week? Does it relate to the number of civil servants that you have available to you? Can you give us some idea as to where the pressures are being applied and what can be done? We made one definite suggestion in terms of one element of this problem, but what else can be done? Because if these constraints do mean that there are good ideas for legislation that can't proceed, then we will all lose out as a result of that.
Welsh: Mae yna elfennau, wrth gwrs, yn y datganiad a'r rhaglen ddeddfwriaethol mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi'i chyhoeddi'r prynhawn yma i'w croesawu. Dŷn ni eisoes wedi datgan ein cefnogaeth i'r egwyddor o gofleidio'r model o bartneriaeth gymdeithasol fydd ynghlwm wrth y Bil mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi cyfeirio ato. Dŷn ni hefyd yn croesawu'r symudiad tuag at ailreoleiddio, i bob pwrpas, y sector bysiau. Dŷn ni'n cyd-fynd o ran y dadansoddiad o'r difrod a wnaethpwyd wrth ddadreoleiddio yn ystod y 1980au, ac mae symud, felly, i'r cyfeiriad arall, dwi'n credu, yn gam ymlaen. Gaf i ofyn, gan fod y sector yma yn un sydd yn mynd trwy ailstrwythuro dybryd, heriol ar hyn o bryd am amryw o resymau, pa waith mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn ei wneud ar hyn o bryd i sicrhau ein bod ni ddim yn aros am y pwerau deddfwriaethol hynny, neu'r pwerau statudol hynny? Er enghraifft, gwnes i godi'r sefyllfa gyda'r Prif Weinidog rai wythnosau'n ôl o ran First Cymru, a'r cyfle, efallai - mae'n fygythiad ond hefyd yn gyfle - i ni sicrhau ein bod ni ddim yn gweld erydu'r gwasanaeth ar draws rhannau helaeth o dde-orllewin Cymru ac ar draws Cymru. Mi oedd e wedi sôn y byddai fe'n cael gair gyda'i Weinidog llywodraeth leol er mwyn cael trafodaeth gyda dinas Abertawe yn y lle cyntaf. O ran tacsis, unwaith eto, mae e'n sector - . Dwi'n credu bod y Prif Weinidog yn ei ddatganiad wedi cydnabod ei fod e'n sector sydd hyd yn oed yn mynd trwy fwy o ailstrwythuro, oherwydd, wrth gwrs, y bygythiad neu'r her o'r economi gig ac yn y blaen, ac efallai dyna yw'r gyriant ar gyfer y syniadau sydd wedi dod o wahanol randdeiliaid. Dwi'n siomedig ein bod ni'n oedi oherwydd, hynny yw, mae'r tirwedd yma yn mynd i edrych yn wahanol mewn dwy neu dair blynedd. Roedd e'n edrych yn wahanol ddwy neu dair blynedd yn ôl, felly allwn ni fforddio, a dweud y gwir, colli'r cyfle er mwyn sicrhau ein bod ni'n gosod y sector yna ar dir teg a gwastad? Mae yna bethau i'w croesawu hefyd o'r Deddfau sydd wedi'u gohirio. Dŷn ni'n croesawu'r penderfyniad i bwyllo o ran y Bil amaeth. Dyna dŷn ni'n gyson wedi'i ddweud ym Mhlaid Cymru, ac mae hwnna'n rhoi cyfle, dwi'n credu, nawr i ni bwyso a mesur a datblygu fframwaith fydd yn gosod sylfaen ar gyfer y dyfodol hirbell. Mae yna bethau ar goll. Dwi ddim yn gallu gweld cyfeiriad at, er enghraifft, Ddeddf awyr glân. Dwi ddim wedi darllen maniffesto'r Prif Weinidog fel arweinydd y Blaid Lafur o glawr i glawr, ond dwi'n credu bod hwnna'n elfen yn y rhaglen roeddech chi wedi'i chyflwyno - hynny yw, Deddf fyddai, wrth gwrs, er enghraifft, yn rhoi hawl statudol i anadlu, yn gosod cyfrifoldeb, neu'n rhoi canllawiau'r WHO ar ryw fath o sail statudol ac yn y blaen. Ac, wrth gwrs, rŷn ni'n gwybod bod yna broblem ddybryd gyda ni ar draws Cymru, felly mae hwn yn rhywbeth lle mae angen symud ymlaen. Ond buaswn i'n dal yn pwyso ar y Llywodraeth, a dweud y gwir, i ailfeddwl ynglŷn â pheidio deddfu ar hyn o bryd. Mi oeddech chi hefyd wedi crybwyll, neu wedi ymrwymo, a dweud y gwir, i estyn y gwaharddiad ar ysmygu, os dwi'n cofio'n iawn, i fannau awyr agored yng nghanol dinasoedd a threfi. Ydy hwnna'n dal yn fwriad gennych chi a gan y Llywodraeth, a phryd ydych chi'n bwriadu deddfu i'r cyfeiriad hwnnw? O ran TERCW - nid wyf yn gwybod beth yw'r acronym Cymraeg eto - mae yn wir, rwy'n credu, fod y corff yma, nid yn unig yn mynd i fod yn gyfrifol am addysg trydyddol ac ymchwil, ond mae hefyd yn mynd i fod yn gyfrifol am arloesi yn yr ystyr eang. Ac rwy'n credu, os dwi'n cofio'n iawn, y bwriad yw i ffurfio is-bwyllgor a fydd yn benodol yn gyfrifol am arloesi ac ymchwil. Onid oes peryg, Brif Weinidog, yn hynny o beth, oherwydd bod arloesedd, wrth gwrs, yn dibynnu ar ymchwil o'r sector addysg uwch, ac yn y blaen, ond mae hwnna dim ond yn cynrychioli un dimensiwn o arloesedd? Mae'r dimensiwn busnes hefyd, wrth gwrs, yn hollbwysig, ac mi oedd yna argymhelliad gan yr Athro Kevin Morgan, sydd yn arbenigwr byd-eang ym maes arloesedd, y dylid, yn hytrach, creu corff arloesedd cenedlaethol ar y model Scandinafaidd. Nid dyna, wrth gwrs, sydd ynghlwm wrth yr argymhellion rydych chi yn eu gweithredu, ond ydy hwnna'n dal yn rhan o'r weledigaeth ar gyfer y Ddeddf rŷch chi'n mynd i gyhoeddi? Ac yn olaf, mae yna gyfeiriad yn eich datganiad tuag at gyfyngiadau deddfwriaethol - ' legislative constraints '. Beth yn union yw'r cyfyngiadau hynny? Ife nifer yr Aelodau, yr amser yn ystod yr wythnos yn y Senedd, sy'n mynd â ni nôl i'r ddadl gawsom ni wythnos diwethaf? Ydy e'n ymwneud â'r nifer o weision sifil sydd gyda chi? A allwch chi roi ryw fath o syniad i ni ble mae'r esgid yn gwasgu, a beth y gellir ei wneud? Wrth gwrs, roedd un awgrym go bendant gyda ni wythnos diwethaf ynglŷn ag un elfen o'r broblem yma, ond beth arall y gellir ei wneud, achos os ydy'r cyfyngiadau yma yn golygu bod yna syniadau da ar gyfer Deddfau ddim yn gallu mynd rhagddi, wrth gwrs, rŷn ni gyd ar ein colled oherwydd hynny?