English: Well, see, there you have it again. Absolute mythology. Where on earth do these bizarre ideas come from? Is it the UKIP game of Trivial Pursuit or something? That is absolute rubbish, because we cannot do it; there are all sorts of aspects with the EU trade agreements that actually restrict other countries having the same terms without the agreement of the EU. There are so many restrictions, the idea that, suddenly, they just all fall into place is absolutely bizarre. And that is the problem with UKIP - the mythology that they have been placing. You would think, at the very least, with their hard line nationalist position, at the very least they would say, 'Well, it's going to be tough, it's going to be disastrous, but this is what we want because we are British nationalists and this is our ideology'. Well, at least you could respect that as a position. But on the one hand to actually say, 'This is what we're going to do, but don't worry about it because there are all these magical things that will come; we're going to sprinkle woofle dust, or whatever it is, on every single agreement and suddenly they convert over'. It would be an absolute disaster. I was talking with GE Aviation in my constituency. One of the problems they face is this: they are at the highest level of engineering, but they have 2,000 or 3,000 components in every engine that get sent all over the world. Now, any delay in that basically makes them, over a period of time, uncompetitive. It doesn't mean that suddenly, overnight, disaster will hit them, but you can be damn sure that, when it comes to the next stages of investments, when futures are being looked at, when there are reorganisations within businesses - . Where will they be? Where would any logical company choose? And that is the dilemma. So, the one thing I'd say is that - . I mean, I can support this motion, because it makes perfect sense. But the one thing I would say to those who are opposing it -
Welsh: Wel, dyna ni, dyna ni'n ei weld eto. Chwedloniaeth bur. O ble ar y ddaear y daw'r syniadau rhyfedd hyn? Ai gêm UKIP o Trivial Pursuit neu rywbeth ydyw? Mae hynny'n nonsens llwyr, oherwydd ni allwn ei wneud; ceir pob math o agweddau ar gytundebau masnach yr UE sy'n cyfyngu ar allu gwledydd eraill i gael yr un telerau heb gytundeb yr UE. Ceir cymaint o gyfyngiadau, fel bod y syniad eu bod oll yn sydyn yn disgyn i'w lle yn gyfan gwbl hurt. A dyna yw'r broblem gyda UKIP - y fytholeg y maent wedi bod yn ei chreu. Fe fyddech yn meddwl, fan lleiaf, gyda'u safbwynt cenedlaetholgar diwyro, y byddent o leiaf yn dweud, 'Wel, mae'n mynd i fod yn anodd, mae'n mynd i fod yn drychinebus, ond dyma rydym ei eisiau oherwydd rydym yn genedlaetholwyr Prydeinig a dyma yw ein hideoleg'. Wel, o leiaf gallech barchu hwnnw fel safbwynt. Ond mae dweud ar y naill law, 'Dyma rydym yn mynd i'w wneud, ond peidiwch â phoeni am y peth oherwydd mae'r holl bethau hudol hyn ar eu ffordd; rydym yn mynd i wasgaru ychydig o lwch hudol, neu beth bynnag ydyw, ar bob cytundeb ac yn sydyn byddant yn trosi draw'. Byddai'n drychineb llwyr. Roeddwn yn siarad â GE Aviation yn fy etholaeth. Un o'r problemau y maent yn eu hwynebu yw'r ffaith eu bod ar y lefel uchaf o beirianneg, ond mae ganddynt 2,000 neu 3,000 o gydrannau ym mhob injan sy'n cael eu hanfon i bob rhan o'r byd. Nawr, yn y bôn bydd unrhyw oedi yn hynny yn eu gwneud, dros gyfnod o amser, yn anghystadleuol. Nid yw'n golygu y bydd trychineb yn eu taro'n sydyn dros nos, ond gallwch fod yn siŵr, pan ddaw'r camau nesaf o ran buddsoddi, pan fydd y dyfodol dan ystyriaeth, pan fydd ad-drefnu o fewn busnesau - . Ble fyddant bryd hynny? Ble fyddai unrhyw gwmni rhesymegol yn ei ddewis? A dyna'r dilema. Felly, yr un peth y buaswn yn ei ddweud yw bod - . Hynny yw, gallaf gefnogi'r cynnig hwn oherwydd mae'n gwneud synnwyr perffaith. Ond un peth y buaswn yn ei ddweud wrth y rheini sy'n ei wrthwynebu -