English: Thank you for confirming that, Cabinet Secretary, and I'm sure, if necessary, you will remind the Westminster Government that this Assembly has voted unanimously in favour of the plan, having seen and studied the independent review by Charles Hendry, commissioned by the previous Westminster Government, which said very clearly that this should proceed as a matter for a pathfinder project and at no cost, almost, or pain, if you like, to Westminster to invest in that. There is one aspect of energy that is completely in your hands and that is that around community schemes and hydropower. My colleague, Sian Gwenllian, raised this with the First Minister yesterday and I'll raise it with you today. I think we'll both be raising it until we get a satisfactory answer, to be honest, which is the effect of revaluation on hydroelectricity and hydro schemes in particular. I've had a letter from the British Hydropower Association, which sets out that most independent hydro schemes, which include community ones, of course, would have previous rateable values of approximately 10 per cent of their revenues, which is similar to other businesses, and they are now seeing those values as a result of the revaluation increase two, three or fourfold, and in some cases, an increase of 900 per cent. This is clearly in danger of cutting off a source of investment for an important niche, perhaps, in some parts, but an important renewable energy industry that we have here in Wales and the potential for further expansion in Wales. So, will you now discuss with the rest of the Cabinet, but particularly the Cabinet Secretary for finance, to see whether some sort of relief can be put in place for renewable energy schemes such as these, similar to what's happened in Scotland, so that we don't choke off this growing industry?
Welsh: Diolch am gadarnhau hynny, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, ac rwy'n siŵr, os bydd angen, y byddwch yn atgoffa Llywodraeth San Steffan fod y Cynulliad hwn wedi pleidleisio'n unfrydol o blaid y cynllun, ar ôl gweld ac astudio adolygiad annibynnol Charles Hendry, a gomisiynwyd gan Lywodraeth flaenorol San Steffan, ac a ddywedai'n glir iawn y dylai hyn barhau fel mater ar gyfer prosiect braenaru, a heb unrhyw gost, bron, neu boendod os mynnwch, i San Steffan fuddsoddi yn hynny. Mae un agwedd ar ynni yn eich dwylo chi yn llwyr, sef cynlluniau cymunedol ac ynni dŵr. Cododd fy nghyd-Aelod, Sian Gwenllian, hyn gyda'r Prif Weinidog ddoe ac rwyf am ei godi gyda chi heddiw. Credaf y bydd y ddau ohonom yn ei godi hyd nes y cawn ateb boddhaol, a dweud y gwir, sef effaith ailbrisio ar drydan dŵr a chynlluniau ynni dŵr yn arbennig. Rwyf wedi cael llythyr gan Gymdeithas Ynni Dŵr Prydain, sy'n nodi y byddai gan y rhan fwyaf o gynlluniau ynni dŵr annibynnol, sy'n cynnwys y rhai cymunedol, wrth gwrs, werthoedd ardrethol blaenorol o oddeutu 10 y cant o'u refeniw, sy'n debyg i fusnesau eraill, a'u bod bellach yn gweld y gwerthoedd hynny, o ganlyniad i'r ailbrisio, yn codi ddwy, dair neu bedair gwaith, ac mewn rhai achosion, gwelwyd cynnydd o 900 y cant. Mae hyn yn amlwg yn bygwth cau ffynhonnell o fuddsoddiad ar gyfer diwydiant pwysig ac arbenigol, i raddau efallai, ond diwydiant ynni adnewyddadwy pwysig sydd gennym yma yng Nghymru a'r potensial ar gyfer ehangu ymhellach yng Nghymru. Felly, a wnewch chi drafod gyda gweddill y Cabinet yn awr, ond yn enwedig gydag Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros gyllid, i weld a ellir sicrhau rhyw fath o ostyngiad ar gyfer cynlluniau ynni adnewyddadwy fel y rhain, yn debyg i'r hyn sydd wedi digwydd yn yr Alban, fel nad ydym yn atal y diwydiant hwn rhag tyfu?