techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: The reform agenda that's currently on to adjust and make a little bit more progressive the current tax system we have is welcome, and in fact it's long overdue, but it's why I'm also having letters from my constituents, because there will always be winners and losers, and I've got some constituents worried that they'll be on the losing side of this, but it is long overdue. But, could I ask the Minister, longer term, is the Welsh Government still, with other parties as well, interested in those discussions around a land reform tax, a fundamental change to the system, in the longer term, of course, or some sort of hybrid model? We know that's it had experimentation worldwide on this, but a Welsh version of this, surely, more progressive, more equitable, and also something that is a tax on the wealth of the landowners, as opposed to a tax on investing in the added value of that land, so it's not a disincentive to entrepreneurism. Is that still on the agenda?
Welsh: Rwy'n croesawu'r agenda ddiwygio bresennol i addasu'r system dreth bresennol sydd gennym a'i gwneud ychydig yn fwy blaengar, ac mewn gwirionedd, mae'n hen bryd gwneud hynny, ond dyna pam fy mod hefyd yn cael llythyrau gan fy etholwyr, gan y bydd bob amser rhai pobl yn ennill a rhai'n colli, ac mae gennyf rai etholwyr yn poeni y byddant yn colli mewn perthynas â hyn, ond mae'n hen bryd gwneud hyn. Ond a gaf fi ofyn i'r Gweinidog, yn fwy hirdymor, a oes diddordeb gan Lywodraeth Cymru o hyd, gyda phleidiau eraill hefyd, yn y trafodaethau ynghylch treth diwygio tir, newid sylfaenol i'r system, yn fwy hirdymor wrth gwrs, neu ryw fath o fodel hybrid? Gwyddom fod arbrofion wedi'u cynnal ledled y byd ar hyn, ond fersiwn Gymreig o hyn, yn sicr, yn fwy blaengar, yn fwy teg, a rhywbeth hefyd sy'n dreth ar gyfoeth y tirfeddianwyr, yn hytrach na threth ar fuddsoddi yng ngwerth ychwanegol y tir hwnnw, fel nad yw'n ddatgymhelliad i entrepreneuriaeth. A yw hynny'n dal ar yr agenda?
English: Huw Irranca-Davies is entirely right that reform is long overdue. It's something that the IFS also noted in its report. It said that council tax is out of date, regressive and distortionary, and we recognise all of that. The IFS did recognise that we are the only part of the United Kingdom that has ever revalued its council tax base, but, nonetheless, we are still very out of date. And the work that we're doing will take us this whole Senedd term, I think, in terms of delivering our council tax reforms, but that doesn't mean that we're not thinking about more radical and fundamental reforms for the future as well. So, in parallel to the work that we're delivering on the revaluation, and the other work attached to that, looking at our support and our exemptions and premiums, and so on, we're also continuing the work on the land value tax, to explore what that might mean for Wales, how it might operate, and also, particularly, with an interest in the first instance, perhaps, in how it might operate in the field of non-domestic rates. So, I think there's a lot of potential there, but, just to reassure those colleagues who do have a strong interest in that, it's very much still part of our explorations.
Welsh: Mae Huw Irranca-Davies yn llygad ei le ei bod yn hen bryd diwygio. Mae'n rhywbeth y mae'r Sefydliad Astudiaethau Cyllid hefyd wedi'i nodi yn ei adroddiad. Dywedodd fod y dreth gyngor wedi dyddio, yn anflaengar ac yn afluniol, ac rydym yn cydnabod hynny oll. Roedd y Sefydliad Astudiaethau Cyllid yn cydnabod mai ni yw'r unig ran o'r Deyrnas Unedig erioed sydd wedi ailbrisio ei sylfaen dreth gyngor, ond serch hynny, rydym yn dal i fod ymhell ar ei hôl hi. A chredaf y bydd y gwaith a wnawn yn cymryd tymor cyfan y Senedd hon er mwyn cyflawni ein diwygiadau i'r dreth gyngor, ond nid yw hynny'n golygu nad ydym yn meddwl am ddiwygiadau mwy radical a sylfaenol ar gyfer y dyfodol hefyd. Felly, ochr yn ochr â'r gwaith a gyflawnwn ar ailbrisio, a'r gwaith arall sydd ynghlwm wrth hynny, gan gynnwys edrych ar ein cymorth a'n heithriadau a'n premiymau ac ati, rydym hefyd yn parhau â'r gwaith ar y dreth gwerth tir, i archwilio beth y gallai hynny ei olygu i Gymru, sut y gallai weithredu, a hefyd, yn arbennig, gyda diddordeb yn y lle cyntaf, efallai, yn y modd y gallai weithredu ym maes ardrethi annomestig. Felly, credaf fod llawer o botensial yno, ond hoffwn roi sicrwydd i'm cyd-Aelodau sydd â diddordeb cryf yn hynny ei fod yn dal i fod yn rhan o'n harchwiliadau.
English: The UK Government has bypassed the Welsh Government and the Senedd on this fund, which fails to address persistent regional inequalities across the UK. I have repeatedly raised with a succession of Chancellors and Treasury Ministers the disruption and the substantial loss of overall funding impacting communities, businesses and charities in Wales.
Welsh: Mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi diystyru Llywodraeth Cymru a'r Senedd mewn perthynas â'r gronfa hon, sy'n methu mynd i'r afael ag anghydraddoldebau rhanbarthol parhaus ledled y DU. Dro ar ôl tro, rwyf wedi sôn wrth gyfres o Gangellorion a Gweinidogion y Trysorlys am y tarfu a'r golled sylweddol o gyllid cyffredinol sy'n effeithio ar gymunedau, busnesau ac elusennau yng Nghymru.
English: And it's causing a real problem; the change of leadership in the Treasury and in the Government has left a lot of uncertainty, although there was already uncertainty there. We've currently got a Government that is pushing the accelerator and the brake on the economy at the same time, and burning out the engine - no wonder they have not got attention to levelling-up. Perhaps they have got attention to levelling-up - levelling-up for bankers, but not levelling-up for our communities. [ Interruption.] You might not like it, but it's the truth. Caerphilly County Borough Council has been able to access some of the funding, but the problem is it comes with very tight deadlines, and that increases the amount of risk and uncertainty involved in the delivery of the funding. They've got to spend that money this financial year, but the advice and the delivery of the funds are very uncertain. So, would the Minister do her best to raise this with the UK Government? Caerphilly council are doing their part, and surely now it's time for the UK Government to do their part.
Welsh: Ac mae'n achosi problem wirioneddol; mae'r newid arweinyddiaeth yn y Trysorlys ac yn y Llywodraeth wedi arwain at lawer o ansicrwydd, er bod ansicrwydd yno eisoes. Ar hyn o bryd, mae gennym Lywodraeth sy'n rhoi eu troed ar y sbardun a'r brêc ar yr economi ar yr un pryd, ac yn gorweithio'r injan - nid yw'n syndod nad ydynt wedi denu sylw at godi'r gwastad. Efallai eu bod wedi denu sylw at godi'r gwastad - codi'r gwastad i fancwyr, ond nid codi'r gwastad i'n cymunedau. [ Torri ar draws.] Efallai nad ydych yn hoffi hynny, ond dyna'r gwir. Mae Cyngor Bwrdeistref Sirol Caerffili wedi gallu cael rhywfaint o'r cyllid, ond y broblem yw bod terfynau amser tynn iawn ynghlwm wrtho, ac mae hynny'n cynyddu faint o risg ac ansicrwydd sy'n gysylltiedig â'r gwaith o ddarparu'r cyllid. Mae'n rhaid iddynt wario'r arian hwnnw yn ystod y flwyddyn ariannol hon, ond mae'r cyngor a'r ffordd y caiff yr arian ei ddarparu'n ansicr iawn. Felly, a wnaiff y Gweinidog ei gorau i godi hyn gyda Llywodraeth y DU? Mae cyngor Caerffili yn chwarae eu rhan, ac mae'n bryd bellach i Lywodraeth y DU chwarae ei rhan hithau.
English: I'd be more than happy to continue to make these arguments in regard to both the levelling-up fund and the shared prosperity fund to the UK Government. We do have our next meeting of the inter-ministerial standing committee, which is what the quadrilaterals used to be, where all the Ministers for finance from the UK get together, and we've asked specifically for a discussion on replacement European Union funding. The short deadlines are a real concern. Of course, with European funding, you'd have a number of years over which to profile the spend, and the short deadlines for both applications and delivery, I think, are really concerning. Also, the size of the fund is a real worry as well. I know that Caerphilly has bid for more than £66 million of funding from the second round of the levelling-up fund, but the fund itself is only worth £800 million across Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, so it will do very little to level up, and we fear that there may be a good number of disappointed local authorities in terms of the bids that they've put forward. But we will absolutely continue to press the UK Government - I do so with my colleague Vaughan Gething, who leads on this - to have a more timely approach and also just to increase the level of funding that is available through these funds.
Welsh: Rwy'n fwy na pharod i barhau i gyflwyno'r dadleuon hyn ynghylch y gronfa ffyniant bro a'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin i Lywodraeth y DU. Mae gennym gyfarfod nesaf y pwyllgor sefydlog rhyngweinidogol, sef y cyfarfodydd pedairochrog gynt, lle mae holl Weinidogion cyllid y DU yn dod ynghyd, ac rydym wedi gofyn yn benodol am drafodaeth ar arian newydd yn lle cyllid yr Undeb Ewropeaidd. Mae'r terfynau amser byr yn bryder gwirioneddol. Wrth gwrs, gyda chyllid Ewropeaidd, byddech yn proffilio'r gwariant dros nifer o flynyddoedd, a chredaf fod y terfynau amser byr ar gyfer ceisiadau a chyflawni yn destun cryn bryder. Yn ogystal â hynny, mae maint y gronfa'n destun cryn bryder hefyd. Gwn fod Caerffili wedi gwneud cais am fwy na £66 miliwn o gyllid drwy ail rownd y gronfa ffyniant bro, ond nid yw'r gronfa ei hun ond yn werth £800 miliwn ar gyfer yr Alban, Gogledd Iwerddon a Chymru, felly ychydig iawn y bydd yn ei wneud i godi'r gwastad, ac rydym yn ofni y gallai nifer o awdurdodau lleol gael eu siomi mewn perthynas â'r ceisiadau y maent wedi'u cyflwyno. Ond yn sicr, byddwn yn parhau i bwyso ar Lywodraeth y DU - rwy'n gwneud hynny gyda fy nghyd-Aelod, Vaughan Gething, sy'n arwain ar hyn - i gael dull mwy amserol, ac i gynyddu lefel y cyllid sydd ar gael drwy'r cronfeydd hyn.
English: The UK Government's levelling-up agenda has brought great benefits to mid Wales, with the last autumn budget seeing a total of £22 million being invested in Powys for elements of social care, tourism and housing, most of which are truly needed in my community. Does the Minister agree with me that funding like this from the Conservative UK Government is a huge boost for rural communities, money which would never have been received from the EU or the Welsh Government under old bureaucratic funding systems, because the UK Conservative Government are interested in levelling up, as you are only interested in levelling down?
Welsh: Mae agenda ffyniant bro Llywodraeth y DU wedi darparu buddion sylweddol i ganolbarth Cymru, gyda chyfanswm o £22 miliwn yn cael ei fuddsoddi ym Mhowys yng nghyllideb yr hydref diwethaf ar gyfer elfennau o ofal cymdeithasol, twristiaeth a thai, y mae gwir angen y rhan fwyaf ohonynt yn fy nghymuned. A yw'r Gweinidog yn cytuno â mi fod cyllid o'r fath gan Lywodraeth Geidwadol y DU yn hwb enfawr i gymunedau gwledig, arian na fyddai byth wedi'i ddarparu gan yr UE na Llywodraeth Cymru o dan hen systemau ariannu biwrocrataidd, gan fod Llywodraeth Geidwadol y DU yn awyddus i godi'r gwastad, a chithau ond yn awyddus i ostwng y gwastad?
English: Well, I was wondering where to even start with that contribution, because we know that the methodology alone results in the fact that Wales will receive £1 billion less in replacement funding from the United Kingdom as compared to what we would have had from the European Union. So, Wales is being absolutely ripped off on this point. And if you think that £20 million in one area of Wales is a great success from the fund, it's absolutely ridiculous, because the amount of funding that is now coming to Wales is so much smaller than it could have been, and we'll be able to do much less across Wales.
Welsh: Wel, roeddwn yn meddwl tybed ble i ddechrau gyda'r cyfraniad hwnnw, gan y gwyddom fod y fethodoleg yn unig yn golygu y bydd Cymru'n cael £1 biliwn yn llai mewn arian newydd gan y Deyrnas Unedig o gymharu â'r hyn y byddem wedi'i gael gan yr Undeb Ewropeaidd. Felly, mae Cymru ar ei cholled yn llwyr yn hyn. Ac os ydych yn credu bod £20 miliwn mewn un ardal o Gymru yn gyfystyr â llwyddiant mawr yn sgil y gronfa, mae hynny'n gwbl chwerthinllyd, gan fod swm y cyllid sydd bellach yn dod i Gymru gymaint yn llai nag y gallai fod, a byddwn yn gallu gwneud llai o lawer ledled Cymru.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. Minister, I know things got a little passionate in the Chamber yesterday, so I do just want to bring the focus back onto how we can help the Welsh economy and Welsh businesses to move forward. In your statement yesterday, you suggested that you didn't support the idea of investment zones, although I appreciate that you'll be having more conversations with UK Government counterparts about these. I believe that these zones have the potential to drive forward business growth and high-skilled jobs in the areas that need them most. Rather than displacing economic activity, if designed in the right way, they could be an opportunity for us to spread investment and aspiration across the country. They also have the potential of complementing some of the other growth deals, city deals, potential free ports as well. Now, I know that our experience with enterprise zones has been mixed across Wales, but there is therefore scope for more ambitious plans to kick start developing. As Ben Francis, the policy chair of the Federation of Small Businesses Cymru, said, 'Wales cannot afford to be left behind in the mission of boosting regional competitiveness.' Will you give assurances, Minister, that you do intend on taking an open-minded approach to the potential for investment zones to be established in Wales, and, if you are against investment zones, then what is the Welsh strategy? How do Ministers intend to use their levers to deliver the levels of economic growth that are needed to overcome the present challenges and to deliver a brighter future for our communities?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Weinidog, gwn i bethau fynd braidd yn danbaid yn y Siambr ddoe, felly hoffwn fynd yn ôl i ganolbwyntio ar sut y gallwn helpu economi Cymru a busnesau Cymru i symud ymlaen. Yn eich datganiad ddoe, fe wnaethoch awgrymu nad oeddech yn cefnogi'r syniad o barthau buddsoddi, er fy mod yn derbyn y byddwch yn cael mwy o sgyrsiau gyda swyddogion cyfatebol yn Llywodraeth y DU ynglŷn â'r rhain. Credaf fod gan y parthau hyn botensial i hybu twf busnes a swyddi crefftus iawn yn yr ardaloedd sydd eu hangen fwyaf. Yn hytrach na chael gwared ar weithgarwch economaidd, os cânt eu cynllunio yn y ffordd gywir, gallent fod yn gyfle inni ledaenu buddsoddiad a dyhead ledled y wlad. Mae ganddynt botensial hefyd i ategu rhai o'r bargeinion twf eraill, bargeinion dinesig, a phorthladdoedd rhydd posibl hefyd. Nawr, gwn fod ein profiad gydag ardaloedd menter wedi bod yn gymysg ledled Cymru, ond mae lle felly i gynlluniau mwy uchelgeisiol roi hwb i ddatblygu. Fel y dywedodd Ben Francis, cadeirydd polisi Ffederasiwn Busnesau Bach Cymru, 'Ni all Cymru fforddio cael ei gadael ar ôl yn y genhadaeth i hybu cystadleurwydd rhanbarthol.' Weinidog, a wnewch chi roi sicrwydd i ni eich bod yn bwriadu mabwysiadu agwedd agored tuag at y posibilrwydd o sefydlu parthau buddsoddi yng Nghymru, ac os ydych yn erbyn parthau buddsoddi, beth yw strategaeth Cymru? Sut y mae Gweinidogion yn bwriadu defnyddio eu hysgogiadau i sicrhau'r lefelau o dwf economaidd sydd eu hangen i oresgyn yr heriau presennol ac i sicrhau dyfodol mwy disglair i'n cymunedau?
English: Well, we are very sceptical about the benefits that investment zones could bring, precisely because we disagree with your analysis in the sense that we believe that investment zones do have the propensity to draw investment away from some areas, and so displacing economic activity from the areas that it's most needed in. And that was one of our concerns over the free ports as well. We are open, of course, to having discussions with the UK Government to hear them out on this issue to see exactly what their proposal is. I do think it's a shame that they didn't have discussions with us ahead of the announcement, bearing in mind that if they want to deliver this policy in Wales, they're going to need Welsh Government to work with them in the sense that non-domestic rates are devolved to Wales, land transaction tax is devolved to Wales, planning is devolved to Wales. So, they will need all of those tools to deliver those investment zones. Of course we'll have the conversations, but I think our starting point is that we're sceptical about the benefits that they can bring.
Welsh: Wel, rydym yn amheus iawn ynghylch y manteision y gallai parthau buddsoddi eu darparu, gan ein bod yn anghytuno â'ch dadansoddiad yn yr ystyr ein bod yn credu bod parthau buddsoddi'n tueddu i dynnu buddsoddiad oddi wrth rai ardaloedd, gan gael gwared ar weithgarwch economaidd o'r ardaloedd lle mae ei angen fwyaf. A dyna oedd un o'n pryderon ynghylch y porthladdoedd rhydd hefyd. Rydym yn agored, wrth gwrs, i gael trafodaethau gyda Llywodraeth y DU ar y mater hwn i glywed beth yn union yw eu cynnig. Credaf ei bod yn drueni na chawsant drafodaethau gyda ni cyn y cyhoeddiad, gan gofio, os ydynt am roi'r polisi hwn ar waith yng Nghymru, y bydd angen i Lywodraeth Cymru weithio gyda hwy yn yr ystyr fod ardrethi annomestig wedi'u datganoli i Gymru, mae'r dreth trafodiadau tir wedi'i datganoli i Gymru, mae cynllunio wedi'i ddatganoli i Gymru. Felly, bydd angen yr holl arfau hynny arnynt er mwyn creu'r parthau buddsoddi hynny. Wrth gwrs y byddwn yn cael y sgyrsiau, ond credaf mai ein man cychwyn yw ein bod yn amheus ynghylch y manteision y gallent eu darparu.
English: Thank you for that, Minister. I'm still slightly concerned because there does not seem to be a clear strategy from Wales's Government of how they are going to specifically support businesses moving forward at a very difficult time. I know you're already reviewing the future of non-domestic rates in Wales, and I look forward to seeing your suggestions in due course, but we also know that, currently, rates here in Wales are higher than in other parts of the UK, whilst the Welsh multiplier is already at a record high. But add in the concerns about the impact that the current high level of inflation will have on business rates on top of the existing concerns and it's clear to see why the sector is calling for urgent help to ease the pressure on them. In fairness, I do want to welcome the business rate relief scheme that the Welsh Government has previously announced, particularly during COVID, but clearly we need a new approach to business taxation that incentivises rather than disincentivises growth and job creation. In the short term, Minister, do you agree with calls made by the Welsh Retail Consortium for you to use your upcoming budget to, at the very least, freeze business rates in order to support retailers during these difficult times? And in the longer term, would you consider looking at more innovative ways to encourage business growth, such as a tapered approach to business rates for start-ups and relief schemes for those businesses looking to expand to additional premises and take on new employees and apprentices? Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch, Weinidog. Rwy'n dal i fod ychydig yn bryderus gan nad ymddengys fod gan Lywodraeth Cymru strategaeth glir ar sut y maent yn mynd i gefnogi busnesau yn benodol i symud ymlaen ar adeg anodd iawn. Gwn eich bod eisoes yn adolygu dyfodol ardrethi annomestig yng Nghymru, ac edrychaf ymlaen at weld eich awgrymiadau maes o law, ond gwyddom hefyd, ar hyn o bryd, fod ardrethi'n uwch yma yng Nghymru nag mewn rhannau eraill o'r DU, tra bo lluosydd Cymru eisoes ar ei lefel uchaf erioed. Ond ychwanegwch y pryderon am yr effaith y bydd y lefel uchel bresennol o chwyddiant yn ei chael ar ardrethi busnes at y pryderon presennol, ac mae'n amlwg pam fod y sector yn galw am gymorth brys i leddfu'r pwysau arnynt. A bod yn deg, hoffwn groesawu'r cynllun rhyddhad ardrethi busnes y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi'i gyhoeddi eisoes, yn enwedig yn ystod COVID, ond yn amlwg, mae arnom angen dull newydd o weithredu trethi busnes sy'n cymell yn hytrach na datgymell twf a chreu swyddi. Yn y tymor byr, Weinidog, a ydych yn cytuno â galwadau arnoch gan Gonsortiwm Manwerthu Cymru i ddefnyddio'r gyllideb sydd gennych ar y ffordd i rewi ardrethi busnes, o leiaf, er mwyn cefnogi manwerthwyr yn ystod y cyfnod anodd hwn? Ac yn fwy hirdymor, a wnewch chi ystyried edrych ar ffyrdd mwy arloesol o annog twf busnes, megis dull graddedig o gyflwyno ardrethi busnes ar gyfer busnesau newydd a chynlluniau rhyddhad ar gyfer busnesau sydd am ehangu i safleoedd ychwanegol a chyflogi gweithwyr a phrentisiaid newydd? Diolch.
English: So, on the issue of non-domestic rates, I'm pleased that the consultation that we recently published has been warmly welcomed, and I'm looking forward to reading the responses to that consultation. In regard to what we might be planning now for our budget, which we will be publishing in the middle of December, of course you'll have heard the statement from the Chancellor on Monday that there's no intention now to bring forward a budget until the spring. So, we are working on the basis that our budget will be fixed, basically, from that which we agreed in our three-year spending plans last year. So, we're not looking to situations where we will have additional funding to allocate, and it's on that basis that I do ask colleagues, and others from outside the Senedd, that, when they are asking for additional funding for areas, particularly those that would cost hundreds of millions of pounds, such as that that you've just described, we do need to identify where in our existing plans we would move that money from. Because I just want to be really clear that our plans at the moment are based on our budget being fixed and there not being additional funding forthcoming for announcement in our draft budget. So, I think that is an important context for all of us. The only main move that we see at the moment would be repayment of the national insurance contributions funding, which, obviously, employers now will not be needing to pay, so that was included in the spending review, and that will need, I think, to go back to Westminster.
Welsh: Felly, ar fater ardrethi annomestig, rwy'n falch fod yr ymgynghoriad a gyhoeddwyd gennym yn ddiweddar wedi cael croeso cynnes, ac edrychaf ymlaen at ddarllen yr ymatebion i'r ymgynghoriad hwnnw. O ran yr hyn y gallem fod yn ei gynllunio yn awr ar gyfer ein cyllideb, y byddwn yn ei chyhoeddi ganol mis Rhagfyr, fe fyddwch wedi clywed y datganiad gan y Canghellor ddydd Llun wrth gwrs nad oes unrhyw fwriad yn awr i gyflwyno cyllideb tan y gwanwyn. Felly, rydym yn gweithio ar y sail y bydd ein cyllideb yn sefydlog, yn y bôn, o'r hyn y cytunwyd arno yn ein cynlluniau gwariant tair blynedd y llynedd. Felly, nid ydym yn ystyried sefyllfaoedd lle bydd gennym arian ychwanegol i'w ddyrannu, ac ar y sail honno y gofynnaf i'm cyd-Aelodau, ac eraill o'r tu allan i'r Senedd, pan fyddant yn gofyn am gyllid ychwanegol ar gyfer gwahanol feysydd, yn enwedig y rheini a fyddai'n costio cannoedd o filiynau o bunnoedd, fel yr hyn yr ydych newydd ei ddisgrifio, mae angen inni nodi o ble yn ein cynlluniau presennol y byddem yn symud yr arian hwnnw. Oherwydd hoffwn nodi'n glir iawn fod ein cynlluniau ar hyn o bryd yn seiliedig ar ein cyllideb yn aros yn sefydlog, ac nad oes cyllid ychwanegol ar gael i'w gyhoeddi yn ein cyllideb ddrafft. Felly, credaf fod hynny'n gyd-destun pwysig i bob un ohonom. Yr unig gam sylweddol a welwn ar hyn o bryd fyddai ad-dalu cyllid y cyfraniadau yswiriant gwladol, na fydd angen i gyflogwyr eu talu bellach wrth gwrs, felly cafodd hynny ei gynnwys yn yr adolygiad o wariant, ac rwy'n credu y bydd angen i hynny fynd yn ôl i San Steffan.