English: I'm pleased to contribute as well to this debate, and was pleased to take part in the Finance Committee's scrutiny of the supplementary budget. I concur with the comments that the Chair of the Finance Committee has made. Thank you for your reference to the work of the Public Accounts Committee. The work in terms of the local health boards and the financing of those is still in progress, so I won't say too much at this stage, other than say that, clearly, there are ongoing concerns again this year about the deficits of the health boards. This isn't a new problem; this is a problem that has been running in one way or another in at least the majority of the boards for some time. It is something that, over time, the Welsh Government does need to get to grips with, particularly in light of the fact that, as Mike Hedges will no doubt mention very shortly, health spending is growing and is pretty much at half - maybe a little bit more now - of the Welsh Government budget. So, the deficits of those health boards is becoming an ever-increasing problem each year and an increasing drain on the Welsh Government's budget. As the Finance Committee report identifies, there have been significant changes in both resource and capital allocations in this supplementary budget, with increases of £15 million and £134 million since the 2018-19 budget. But, that said, it's true to say that, though substantial, they are not issues that are of enormous significance for us to worry about too much during this budget-setting time. The Welsh Conservatives welcome the fact that further consequentials from the UK Government in the region of £2,761,000 in respect of research and development from the 2016 UK budget have come our way. Then there are the changes of the 2017 UK budget and, as we know, Wales will benefit from an extra £1.2 billion funding over the next four years, along with an extra £160 million for the Welsh NHS and local authorities over the next two years as a result of Barnett consequentials. We've not yet had a commitment from the Welsh Government as to whether - or, indeed, an indication - they intend for that money to be going to the health service. That would be welcomed at some point, Cabinet Secretary. Whilst we do need to make efficiency savings within the health service and try and get the local health boards out of deficit, it's still also important to recognise that additional money of a certain proportion, at least, has come from the UK Government to the Welsh Government for spending in that area. I don't think the Cabinet Secretary mentioned the fiscal framework during this supplementary budget. We often mention it in this Chamber. It's been welcomed by all parties, and it's good to know that Wales will receive funding of 120 per cent relative to the English spend per head of population as a result of that hard-fought-for fiscal framework, and that is an achievement that should be recognised. If I can turn to some of the detail - a little bit of the detail of the budget - the finance Chair has mentioned much of it. You did mention education and you touched on money to replace the school uniform grant, and also changes in the Gypsy/Traveller, Roma and ethnic minority portion of the EIG. That was a subject of some discussion. I know that the Children, Young People and Education Committee have had concerns about cuts, certainly in the case of the Gypsy/Traveller, Roma and ethnic minority portion of the EIG. How is that recognised within this budget? Are errors that have been made in the past in terms of money being cut off without new money being brought down the line? Has that been rectified in this budget, and is that now dealt with? In terms of economy and transport, the £10 million allocation from capital reserves for active travel routes are to be welcomed. But it does highlight how we are still waiting, I think it's five years now down the line, from the introduction of the Active Travel (Wales) Act 2013. I remember working on it in the last Assembly on the Enterprise and Business Committee, as it was. Very good legislation in principle, but here we are still waiting for those outcomes some way down the line. So, can we be confident that with this additional capital spending, Cabinet Secretary, we will finally see a light at the end of the tunnel when it comes to some of these objectives from the active travel Act being realised? As the Chair of the Finance Committee has said, we are monitoring closely the changes that were made, very much using this, I suppose, as a case study for future budget scrutiny. There are changes to that scrutiny coming down the line, which we need to look at with the devolution of tax powers next year. Welsh Conservatives, it will not surprise you to know, will be abstaining on this supplementary budget, as we didn't support the original budget, and this is amendments to that. But by and large, I'm pleased to have worked with the Finance Committee on providing extra scrutiny for this budget.
Welsh: Rwy'n falch o gyfrannu at y ddadl hon hefyd, ac roeddwn yn falch o gymryd rhan yng ngwaith y Pwyllgor Cyllid o graffu ar y gyllideb atodol. Rwy'n cytuno â'r sylwadau a wnaed gan Gadeirydd y Pwyllgor Cyllid. Diolch am gyfeirio at waith y Pwyllgor Cyfrifon Cyhoeddus. Mae'r gwaith ar y byrddau iechyd lleol a'u hariannu yn dal ar y gweill, felly wnaf i ddim dweud gormod ar hyn o bryd, ac eithrio dweud, yn amlwg, bod pryderon parhaus unwaith eto eleni am ddiffygion cyllidebol y byrddau iechyd. Nid yw hyn yn broblem newydd; mae'n broblem sydd wedi bodoli mewn un ffordd neu'r llall yn y rhan fwyaf o'r byrddau ers peth amser. Mae'n rhywbeth y mae angen i Lywodraeth Cymru, dros amser, fynd i'r afael ag ef, yn enwedig yng ngoleuni'r ffaith, y bydd Mike Hedges yn siŵr o'i grybwyll cyn bo hir, bod gwariant ar iechyd yn cynyddu a'i fod ar hyn o bryd yn cyfrif am hanner - efallai ychydig yn fwy yn awr - cyllideb Llywodraeth Cymru. Felly, mae diffygion cyllidebol y byrddau iechyd hynny yn dod yn broblem gynyddol bob blwyddyn ac yn faich cynyddol ar gyllideb Llywodraeth Cymru. Fel y dywed adroddiad y Pwyllgor Cyllid, bu newidiadau sylweddol mewn adnoddau a chyfalaf dyraniadau yn y gyllideb atodol hon, gyda chynnydd o £15 miliwn a £134 miliwn ers cyllideb 2018-19. Ond, wedi dweud hynny, mae'n wir dweud, er eu bod yn sylweddol, nad ydynt yn faterion sydd o bwys aruthrol i ni boeni'n ormodol yn eu cylch yn ystod yr amser hwn o bennu'r gyllideb. Mae'r Ceidwadwyr Cymreig yn croesawu'r ffaith bod symiau canlyniadol pellach gan Lywodraeth y DU o oddeutu £2,761,000 wedi dod i'n rhan o gyllideb 2016 y DU mewn perthynas â gwaith ymchwil a datblygu. Yna ceir y newidiadau yng nghyllideb 2017 y Deyrnas Unedig ac, fel y gwyddom ni, bydd Cymru yn elwa ar £1.2 biliwn o gyllid ychwanegol dros y pedair blynedd nesaf, ynghyd â £160 miliwn ychwanegol ar gyfer GIG Cymru ac awdurdodau lleol dros y ddwy flynedd nesaf oherwydd symiau canlyniadol yn deillio o fformiwla Barnett. Nid ydym ni eto wedi cael ymrwymiad, neu yn wir, awgrym, gan Lywodraeth Cymru pa un a ydyn nhw'n bwriadu i'r arian hwnnw fynd i'r gwasanaeth iechyd. Byddai hynny i'w groesawu rywbryd, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet. Er bod angen inni wneud arbedion effeithlonrwydd yn y gwasanaeth iechyd a cheisio gwyrdroi diffyg cyllidebol y byrddau iechyd lleol, mae'n dal yn bwysig hefyd i gydnabod bod arian ychwanegol o ryw gyfran, o leiaf, wedi dod gan Lywodraeth y DU i Lywodraeth Cymru i'w wario yn y maes hwnnw. Nid wyf yn credu i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet sôn am y fframwaith cyllidol yn ystod y gyllideb atodol hon. Rydym ni'n aml yn sôn amdano yn y Siambr hon. Mae wedi'i groesawu gan bob plaid, ac mae'n dda gwybod y bydd Cymru yn derbyn arian o 120 y cant o'i gymharu â'r gwariant fesul pen o'r boblogaeth yn Lloegr o ganlyniad i'r fframwaith cyllidol hwnnw y brwydrwyd mor galed i'w sicrhau, ac mae hynny'n gyflawniad y dylid ei gydnabod. Os caf i droi at rai o'r manylion - ychydig o fanylion y gyllideb - mae Cadeirydd y Pwyllgor Cyllid wedi sôn am lawer o hyn. Fe wnaethoch chi sôn am addysg a chrybwyll arian i ddisodli'r grant gwisg ysgol, a hefyd newidiadau yn y gyfran o'r grant gwella addysg fydd yn mynd tuag at Sipsiwn a Theithwyr, Roma a lleiafrifoedd ethnig. Roedd hynny'n destun peth trafod. Rwy'n gwybod bod y Pwyllgor Addysg, Plant a Phobl ifanc wedi bod yn pryderu am doriadau, yn sicr yn achos y gyfran o'r grant gwella addysg a fydd yn mynd tuag at Sipsiwn a Theithwyr, Roma a lleiafrifoedd ethnig. Sut caiff hynny ei gydnabod yn y gyllideb hon? A yw'r camgymeriadau a wnaethpwyd yn y gorffennol o ran diddymu arian heb gyflwyno unrhyw arian newydd yn cael eu hunioni? A gywirwyd hynny yn y gyllideb hon, ac a yw hynny wedi'i ddatrys erbyn hyn? O ran yr economi a thrafnidiaeth, mae'r dyraniad o £10 miliwn o gronfeydd cyfalaf ar gyfer llwybrau teithio llesol i'w groesawu. Ond mae yn amlygu sut yr ydym ni'n dal i aros, mae'n bum mlynedd rwy'n credu ers cyflwyno Deddf Teithio Llesol (Cymru) 2013. Rwy'n cofio gweithio arno yn y Cynulliad diwethaf ar y Pwyllgor Menter a Busnes, fel yr oedd bryd hynny. Deddfwriaeth dda iawn mewn egwyddor, ond dyma ni yn dal i aros am y canlyniadau ers peth amser bellach. Felly, a allwn ni fod yn hyderus gyda'r gwariant cyfalaf ychwanegol hwn, Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, y byddwn ni o'r diwedd yn gweld golau ar ddiwedd y twnnel o ran gwireddu rhai o'r amcanion hyn o'r Ddeddf Teithio Llesol? Fel y dywedodd Cadeirydd y Pwyllgor Cyllid, rydym ni'n cadw golwg fanwl ar y newidiadau a wnaed, gan ddefnyddio hwn, i raddau helaeth iawn mae'n debyg, yn astudiaeth achos ar gyfer craffu ar y gyllideb yn y dyfodol. Mae newidiadau i'r gwaith craffu hwnnw ar y gweill, y mae angen inni edrych arnyn nhw wrth ddatganoli pwerau treth y flwyddyn nesaf. Bydd y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig, ni fyddwch yn synnu i wybod, yn ymatal ar y gyllideb atodol hon, gan nad oeddem ni'n cefnogi'r gyllideb wreiddiol, a gwelliannau i honno yw hyn. Ond ar y cyfan, rwy'n falch o fod wedi gweithio gyda'r Pwyllgor Cyllid i wneud gwaith craffu ychwanegol ar gyfer y gyllideb hon.