English: As others have said, I think we are very fortunate in Wales to have such a high-quality marine environment, and it's very important that we now take forward marine planning as is proposed by Welsh Government so that we do have a more co-ordinated approach that, again, other Members have spoken of. Up to now, I think we have seen different particular interests pursuing their own agendas with regard to the marine environment, and often that has given rise to some tension, if not conflict, between different uses. We have seen groups concerned with wildlife and the habitats for wildlife, very concerned that there's been insufficient protection or acknowledgement of their concerns and their issues. I hope we do now see the correct and proper balance being struck through this more co-ordinated approach. But there are various concerns that some of the environmental groups have that I think we do need to acknowledge and address. So, for example, in taking forward this more co-ordinated approach, we do need to ensure that we have sufficient understanding of the potential impact of various marine activity upon wildlife habitats; that we do need to sufficiently safeguard our natural environment and biodiversity through that understanding and policies that acknowledge and address it; that our strategic resource areas are developed not just on the basis of the potential for growth of particular industries, which has been the emphasis up to now, but that there is proper adequate social and environmental screening at an appropriate stage. So, there are concerns, for example, that if the maps were published at the current time, it would be premature, because that screening hasn't taken place, and there is a need for further work on spatial elements of the plan to ensure that natural resource issues are properly factored in to the delineation of those areas, and that we are sufficiently protecting threatened wildlife. Of course, it is relevant to tomorrow's debate on marine protected areas. How will marine planning and those protected areas interact? How will the plan support protection of those particular areas? We do know that the strategic resource areas in the marine plan do not acknowledge the location of protected sites, but they do acknowledge that those sites may be impacted. So, how will Welsh Government ensure that marine protection areas are increasingly effective in ensuring and providing that protection? Also, Llywydd, Welsh Government's own assessment of our national marine plan does acknowledge the risk of environmental damage, and that does obviously then beg the question as to how Welsh Government will guard against this risk and avoid the negative impacts that might occur. Of course, that's relevant as well to our well-being goals. Welsh Government must ensure that all of those well-being goals are properly addressed in striking the correct balance around these potentially competing interests. So, it is a major challenge, I would say, to Welsh Government. Some Members have referred to the timescale that's been involved in taking these plans forward - it has been a lengthy process - but I do agree that the challenge is to get it right. There's a lot to be considered in getting it right, and I do hope very much that the concerns of the environmental organisations that have been expressed here today are properly considered by Welsh Government, and that Lesley Griffiths, who I know is a listening Cabinet Secretary, does continue to have that necessary dialogue, because I very strongly believe it's only if that dialogue does continue that we will maximise our prospects of striking that correct balance.
Welsh: Fel y mae eraill wedi'i ddweud, rwy'n credu ein bod yn ffodus iawn yng Nghymru fod gennym amgylchedd morol o ansawdd mor uchel, ac mae'n bwysig iawn inni bellach fwrw ymlaen â chynllunio morol fel y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn ei gynnig, fel bod gennym ddull gweithredu mwy cydgysylltiedig, y mae, unwaith eto, Aelodau eraill wedi sôn amdano. Hyd yn hyn, rwy'n credu ein bod wedi gweld gwahanol fuddiannau penodol yn dilyn eu hagenda eu hunain o ran yr amgylchedd morol, ac yn aml mae hynny wedi arwain at rywfaint o densiwn, os nad gwrthdaro rhwng y gwahanol ddefnyddiau. Rydym wedi gweld grwpiau sy'n ymwneud â bywyd gwyllt a chynefinoedd bywyd gwyllt yn pryderu'n fawr nad oes digon o amddiffyniad na digon o gydnabyddiaeth o'u pryderon a'u materion. Rwy'n gobeithio ein bod ni yn awr yn gweld y cydbwysedd cywir a phriodol drwy'r dull gweithredu mwy cydgysylltiedig hwn. Ond mae pryderon amrywiol sydd gan rai o'r grwpiau amgylcheddol y credaf fod angen inni eu cydnabod a mynd i'r afael â nhw. Felly, er enghraifft, wrth ddatblygu'r dull gweithredu mwy cydgysylltiedig hwn, mae angen i ni sicrhau bod gennym ddigon o ddealltwriaeth o effaith bosibl y gweithgarwch morol amrywiol ar gynefinoedd bywyd gwyllt; bod angen i ni ddiogelu yn ddigonol ein hamgylchedd naturiol a'n bioamrywiaeth drwy'r ddealltwriaeth honno a pholisïau sy'n cydnabod ac yn ymdrin â hynny; bod ein meysydd adnoddau strategol yn cael eu datblygu nid yn unig ar sail y potensial i ddiwydiannau penodol dyfu, sef yr hyn sydd wedi'i bwysleisio hyd yma, ond y ceir sgrinio cymdeithasol ac amgylcheddol digonol a phriodol ar gam priodol. Felly, mae yna bryderon, er enghraifft, pe byddai'r mapiau'n cael eu cyhoeddi ar hyn o bryd, byddai'n rhy gynnar, gan nad yw'r sgrinio hynny wedi'i wneud, ac mae angen gwaith ychwanegol ar elfennau gofodol y cynllun er mwyn sicrhau bod materion adnoddau naturiol wedi'u hymgorffori'n briodol yn narluniadau'r ardaloedd hynny, a'n bod yn diogelu bywyd gwyllt sydd dan fygythiad yn ddigonol. Wrth gwrs, mae'n berthnasol i'r ddadl yfory ar ardaloedd morol gwarchodedig. Sut bydd cynllunio morol a'r ardaloedd gwarchodedig hynny yn rhyngweithio? Sut bydd y cynllun yn cefnogi gwarchod yr ardaloedd penodol hynny? Rydym yn gwybod nad yw'r meysydd adnoddau strategol yn y cynllun morol yn cydnabod lleoliad safleoedd gwarchodedig, ond maen nhw'n cydnabod y gallai effeithio ar y safleoedd hynny. Felly, sut bydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn sicrhau bod ardaloedd gwarchod morol yn fwyfwy effeithiol o ran sicrhau a darparu'r amddiffyniad hwnnw? Hefyd, Llywydd, mae asesiad Llywodraeth Cymru ei hun o'n cynllun morol cenedlaethol yn cydnabod y risg o niwed i'r amgylchedd, ac mae hynny'n amlwg felly'n codi'r cwestiwn ynghylch sut y bydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn gochel rhag y risg hwn ac yn osgoi effeithiau negyddol posibl. Wrth gwrs, mae hynny'n berthnasol hefyd i'n nodau llesiant. Mae'n rhaid i Lywodraeth Cymru sicrhau bod pob un o'r nodau llesiant hynny yn cael sylw priodol wrth daro'r cydbwysedd cywir ynghylch y buddion hyn a allai gystadlu â'i gilydd. Felly, mae'n her fawr, byddwn i'n dweud, i Lywodraeth Cymru. Mae rhai Aelodau wedi cyfeirio at yr amserlen wrth fwrw ymlaen â'r cynlluniau hyn - mae wedi bod yn broses hir - ond rwy'n cytuno mai'r her yw ei gwneud yn iawn. Mae llawer i'w ystyried wrth ei gwneud yn iawn, ac rwy'n gobeithio'n fawr iawn y bydd pryderon y sefydliadau amgylcheddol a fynegwyd yma heddiw yn cael eu hystyried yn briodol gan Lywodraeth Cymru, a bod Lesley Griffiths, y gwn ei bod yn Ysgrifennydd Cabinet sy'n gwrando, yn parhau i gael y ddeialog angenrheidiol honno, oherwydd rwy'n credu'n gryf iawn mai dim ond os bydd y ddeialog honno'n parhau y bydd modd i ni wneud popeth posibl i sicrhau'r cydbwysedd cywir hwnnw.