English: Thank you, First Minister, for your statement this afternoon. I have to state my disappointment at such a lightweight statement, which talks in very flowery language but doesn't offer much substance, to be honest with you. I do believe that the smokescreen - [Interruption.] I do believe the smokescreen of the referendum result is most probably just mirroring an inability for the Government to reach agreement with its coalition partners over a programme for government and I do think that people do need to reflect on that, because there are many issues that could've been brought forward in this statement, and then we could've had the bigger document. I remember the last programme for government in the fourth Assembly - 666 pages with a sunflower on the front of it, and my colleague Nick Ramsay was very concerned about the future of that sunflower. It didn't make it to the end of the Assembly; the sunflower died and wilted, and I do think this Government is wilting only in its first couple of hundred days within office. But there is a lot of important stuff that the First Minister could've covered in his statement this afternoon, because it is 'Priorities for Government'. There is no mention of the steel crisis at all in this statement whatsoever. You wouldn't have known that the emergency question or the urgent question was going to be taken when this statement was being drafted, so I am surprised that there is no mention of the steel crisis, because surely that is a priority for the Government. I am surprised that there is no mention of how the Government proposes to tackle the NHS deficit in two of the NHS local health boards, which amounts to £50 million, which, again, could've been alluded to in this statement, accepting that the bigger document would come in the autumn. The First Minister could've elaborated on the commitment around business rates, which we've been trying to get an understanding of for the last eight weeks since the election, but no Minister has come forward to explain exactly what that commitment would mean for businesses. Again, that could've been incorporated in this statement. We could've had an understanding of the cost that the Lib Dems have extracted from the Government, because, as the Lib Dems have pointed out, there is a significant financial cost to the commitments the Government has made, and the First Minister could've been in a position to inform us, via this statement, exactly what those costs were - again, something that was within your gift and you could've brought forward. So, I would hope that, in response to me, you will give us some answers to those questions. What is the Government doing to address the NHS deficit here in Wales? What is the Government going to do on business rates - in particular, what new scheme will it bring forward? And what will it be doing to engage with the steel industry going forward, because it does seem to have been wrong-footed entirely by the announcements that were brought forward last week? And I have to say, First Minister, you weren't in here when the urgent question was taken, and some of those answers provided little or no comfort to Members, irrespective of political colour in this Chamber, I have to say. We want to work on a cross-party basis on this and I think the arrangements to date have been very constructive, but I have to say that the response that was received on the urgent question today does not give much comfort to Members of any political party in this Chamber. So, I'd hope that maybe you will respond in a fuller way, because you could've incorporated that in your statement. You did touch on the metro project and how that will be taken forward. I notice there's nothing about the north Wales growth deal in here at all and how you will work to promote north Wales in particular, because, in your manifesto, you did have proposals for a north Wales metro, but you've chosen not to mention anything around north Wales - [Interruption.] I've read the statement very clearly; you allude to the metro project here in south Wales, you have. So, First Minister, actually, instead of using this opportunity to map out what the Government's priorities are going forward, you have just chosen to fill it with flowery language that carried little substance and won't make any difference to people's lives across Wales. So, on the questions I've put to you, can you give us some substantive answers or will we just have to wait another nine weeks to come back here and get another flowery document of 666 pages with, what, a daffodil on it instead of a sunflower this time, First Minister?
Welsh: Diolch, Brif Weinidog, am eich datganiad y prynhawn yma. Mae'n rhaid imi ddatgan fy siom ynghylch datganiad mor ysgafn, sy'n defnyddio iaith flodeuog iawn, ond nad yw'n cynnig llawer o sylwedd, i fod yn onest gyda chi. Yr wyf yn credu bod llen fwg - [Torri ar draws.] Yr wyf yn credu bod llen fwg canlyniad y refferendwm yn ôl pob tebyg yn adlewyrchu anallu'r Llywodraeth i ddod i gytundeb gyda'i phartneriaid yn y glymblaid ar raglen lywodraethu ac rwy'n meddwl bod angen i bobl fyfyrio ar hynny, oherwydd gallai'r datganiad hwn fod wedi cyflwyno llawer o faterion, ac yna gallem fod wedi cael y ddogfen fwy. Rwy'n cofio rhaglen lywodraethu olaf y pedwerydd Cynulliad - 666 o dudalennau a blodyn haul ar ei flaen, ac roedd fy nghydweithiwr Nick Ramsay yn bryderus iawn am ddyfodol y blodyn haul hwnnw. Ni chafodd fyw tan ddiwedd y Cynulliad; gwywodd y blodyn haul a bu farw, ac rwy'n meddwl bod y Llywodraeth hon yn gwywo, a hynny o fewn dim ond cwpl o gannoedd o ddiwrnodau'r tymor. Ond mae llawer o bethau pwysig y gallai'r Prif Weinidog fod wedi'u cynnwys yn ei ddatganiad y prynhawn yma, gan mai 'Blaenoriaethau ar gyfer y Llywodraeth' ydyw. Nid oes dim sôn am yr argyfwng dur yn y datganiad hwn o gwbl. Ni fyddech wedi gwybod bod y cwestiwn argyfwng na'r cwestiwn brys yn mynd i gael eu gofyn pan gafodd y datganiad ei ddrafftio, felly rwy'n synnu nad oes dim sôn am yr argyfwng dur, oherwydd yn sicr mae hwnnw'n flaenoriaeth i'r Llywodraeth. Rwy'n synnu nad oes dim sôn am sut y mae'r Llywodraeth yn bwriadu ymdrin â diffyg ariannol y GIG mewn dau o fyrddau iechyd lleol y GIG, sy'n werth £50 miliwn, ac, unwaith eto, y gallai'r datganiad hwn fod wedi cyfeirio ato, gan dderbyn y byddai'r ddogfen fwy yn dod yn yr hydref. Gallai'r Prif Weinidog fod wedi ymhelaethu ar yr ymrwymiad o gwmpas ardrethi busnes, rhywbeth yr ydym wedi bod yn ceisio ei ddeall am yr wyth wythnos diwethaf ers yr etholiad, ond nid oes yr un Gweinidog wedi dod ymlaen i esbonio beth yn union fyddai'r ymrwymiad hwnnw'n ei olygu i fusnesau. Unwaith eto, gallai hynny fod wedi cael ei ymgorffori yn y datganiad hwn. Gallem fod wedi cael dealltwriaeth o'r gost y mae'r Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol wedi'i thynnu o'r Llywodraeth, oherwydd, fel y mae'r Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol wedi'i nodi, mae yna gost ariannol sylweddol i'r ymrwymiadau y mae'r Llywodraeth wedi eu gwneud, a gallai'r Prif Weinidog fod wedi bod mewn sefyllfa i roi gwybod inni, drwy gyfrwng y datganiad hwn, beth yn union oedd y costau hynny - eto, rhywbeth y gallech fod wedi'i wneud ac y gallech fod wedi'i gyflwyno. Felly, byddwn yn gobeithio, wrth fy ateb i, y byddwch yn rhoi rhai atebion i'r cwestiynau hynny. Beth mae'r Llywodraeth yn ei wneud i ymdrin â diffyg ariannol y GIG yma yng Nghymru? Beth mae'r Llywodraeth yn mynd i'w wneud am ardrethi busnes - yn benodol, pa gynllun newydd y byddant yn ei gyflwyno? A beth fyddant yn ei wneud i ymgysylltu â'r diwydiant dur yn y dyfodol, oherwydd mae'n ymddangos bod y cyhoeddiadau a gyflwynwyd yr wythnos diwethaf wedi eu synnu'n llwyr? Ac mae'n rhaid imi ddweud, Brif Weinidog, nad oeddech yma pan gafodd y cwestiwn brys ei ofyn, ac nid oedd rhai o'r atebion hynny'n darparu rhyw lawer o gysur i'r Aelodau, os o gwbl, beth bynnag fo'u lliw gwleidyddol yn y Siambr hon, rhaid imi ddweud. Hoffem weithio ar sail drawsbleidiol ar hyn ac rwy'n meddwl bod y trefniadau hyd yn hyn wedi bod yn adeiladol iawn, ond rhaid imi ddweud nad yw'r ymateb a gawsom i'r cwestiwn brys heddiw'n rhoi llawer o gysur i Aelodau o unrhyw blaid wleidyddol yn y Siambr hon. Felly, byddwn yn gobeithio efallai y gwnewch ymateb mewn ffordd lawnach, oherwydd gallech fod wedi ymgorffori hynny yn eich datganiad. Gwnaethoch sôn yn gryno am y prosiect metro a sut y bydd hwnnw'n cael ei ddatblygu. Rwy'n sylwi nad oes dim byd am fargen twf y gogledd yma o gwbl a sut y byddwch yn gweithio i hyrwyddo'r gogledd yn benodol, oherwydd, yn eich maniffesto, roedd gennych gynigion am fetro i'r gogledd, ond rydych wedi dewis peidio â sôn am ddim byd yn y gogledd - [Torri ar draws.] Rwyf wedi darllen y datganiad yn glir iawn; rydych yn cyfeirio at y prosiect metro yma yn y de, rydych wedi. Felly, Brif Weinidog, mewn gwirionedd, yn hytrach na defnyddio'r cyfle hwn i fapio beth fydd blaenoriaethau'r Llywodraeth yn y dyfodol, rydych wedi dewis ei lenwi â iaith flodeuog heb ryw lawer o sylwedd na fydd yn gwneud dim gwahaniaeth i fywydau pobl ledled Cymru. Felly, ar y cwestiynau yr wyf wedi'u gofyn ichi, a allwch chi roi rhai atebion o sylwedd inni, ynteu a fydd yn rhaid inni aros naw wythnos arall i ddod yn ôl yma a chael dogfen flodeuog arall o 666 o dudalennau gyda, beth, cennin Pedr arni yn lle blodyn haul y tro hwn, Brif Weinidog?