techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you for your answer, First Minister. The level of service on the rail network in Wales has been wholly unacceptable over the summer. I have received dozens and dozens of complaints, either with people copying me into their own correspondence to Transport for Wales, or constituents contacting me directly - not to mention the issues aired over social media. Complaints fall into a number of categories that include cancelled trains, lack of staff, delayed trains, overcrowding and standing room only, signalling problems, a lack of appropriate carriages and a lack of quality information when issues do occur. When Transport for Wales took over the franchise last year, they raised expectations and the Welsh Government also told rail users they would see improvements. Can you tell rail users today when they can expect to see the improvements that you promised last year?
Welsh: Diolch am eich ateb, Prif Weinidog. Mae lefel y gwasanaeth ar y rhwydwaith rheilffyrdd yng Nghymru wedi bod yn gwbl annerbyniol dros yr haf. Rwyf i wedi derbyn dwsinau ar ddwsinau o gwynion, naill ai drwy bobl yn fy nghynnwys yn eu gohebiaeth eu hunain at Trafnidiaeth Cymru, neu etholwyr yn cysylltu â mi yn uniongyrchol - heb sôn am y problemau a godwyd ar gyfryngau cymdeithasol. Mae'r cwynion yn perthyn i nifer o gategorïau sy'n cynnwys trenau a ganslwyd, diffyg staff, trenau wedi eu gohirio, gorlenwi a lle i sefyll yn unig, problemau gyda signalau, diffyg cerbydau priodol a diffyg gwybodaeth o ansawdd pan fydd problemau'n codi. Pan gymerodd Trafnidiaeth Cymru y fasnachfraint drosodd y llynedd, codwyd disgwyliadau ganddyn nhw a dywedodd Llywodraeth Cymru hefyd wrth ddefnyddwyr y rheilffyrdd y bydden nhw'n gweld gwelliannau. A allwch chi ddweud wrth ddefnyddwyr y rheilffyrdd heddiw pryd y gallan nhw ddisgwyl gweld y gwelliannau a addawyd gennych y llynedd?
English: Llywydd, I saw information put out by the Member over the summer in which he complained that only 97 per cent of trains on the Cambrian line had run over the summer. I think there are people in Thameslink who would think they'd arrived in rail heaven if his Government was able to deliver 97 per cent of all planned services on that line. The Member will have seen yesterday the announcement made of £194 million-worth of investment in railway stations across Wales, and that will certainly attend to the point that the Member made, which was a fair point, about -
Welsh: Llywydd, gwelais wybodaeth a gyhoeddwyd gan yr Aelod dros yr haf pryd yr oedd yn cwyno mai dim ond 97 y cant o drenau ar reilffordd y Cambrian a oedd wedi rhedeg dros yr haf. Rwy'n credu bod pobl yn Thameslink a fyddai'n meddwl eu bod nhw wedi cyrraedd nefoedd y rheilffyrdd pe byddai ei Lywodraeth yn gallu darparu 97 y cant o'r holl wasanaethau a gynlluniwyd ar y rheilffordd honno. Bydd yr Aelod wedi gweld y cyhoeddiad ddoe o fuddsoddiad gwerth £194 miliwn mewn gorsafoedd rheilffordd ledled Cymru, a bydd hynny'n sicr yn rhoi sylw i'r pwynt a wnaeth yr Aelod, a oedd yn bwynt teg, ynghylch -
English: The Member will need to listen rather than speak and then he would have a chance of hearing the answer to his question, wouldn't he? The £194 million investment announced yesterday will certainly attend to the fair point the Member made - that's what I was about to say when he started interrupting me - about information being provided to passengers. The Member said when he was interrupting me that Transport for Wales has said that the performance on some lines, including the Cambrian line, has not been acceptable over this summer, and they're working hard with Network Rail to make sure that signalling difficulties that were experienced on that line are being put right. Of course we want to see further improvements. The £5 billion investment that I referred to earlier will certainly deliver that. People, I believe, are already seeing improvements in many parts of the rail service in Wales and that's what they will continue to see as the franchise unfolds.
Welsh: Bydd angen i'r Aelod wrando yn hytrach na siarad ac yna byddai ganddo siawns o glywed yr ateb i'w gwestiwn, oni fyddai? Bydd y buddsoddiad £194 miliwn a gyhoeddwyd ddoe yn sicr yn rhoi sylw i'r pwynt teg a wnaeth yr Aelod - dyna'r hyn yr oeddwn i ar fin ei ddweud pan ddechreuodd ef dorri ar fy nhraws - ynghylch darparu gwybodaeth i deithwyr. Dywedodd yr Aelod pan yr oedd yn torri ar fy nhraws bod Trafnidiaeth Cymru wedi dweud nad yw'r perfformiad ar rai rheilffyrdd, gan gynnwys rheilffordd y Cambrian, wedi bod yn dderbyniol yn ystod yr haf hwn, a'u bod yn gweithio'n galed gyda Network Rail i wneud yn siŵr bod trafferthion â signalau a gafwyd ar y rheilffordd honno yn cael eu datrys. Wrth gwrs, rydym ni eisiau gweld rhagor o welliannau. Bydd y buddsoddiad o £5 biliwn y cyfeiriais ato'n gynharach yn sicr yn cyflawni hynny. Credaf fod pobl eisoes yn gweld gwelliannau mewn sawl rhan o'r gwasanaeth rheilffyrdd yng Nghymru a dyna fyddan nhw'n parhau i'w weld wrth i'r fasnachfraint ddatblygu.
English: The measures to which the Member refers are set out in the revised and strengthened non-domestic rating Order, passed by this Assembly in 2016. Responsibility for the effective operation of these procedures lies with local authorities and the Valuation Office Agency.
Welsh: Mae'r mesurau y mae'r Aelod yn cyfeirio atyn nhw wedi eu hamlinellu yn y Gorchymyn ardrethu annomestig diwygiedig ac a gryfhawyd, a basiwyd gan y Cynulliad hwn yn 2016. Awdurdodau lleol ac Asiantaeth y Swyddfa Brisio sy'n gyfrifol am weithredu'r gweithdrefnau hyn yn effeithiol.
English: First Minister, while listening to the radio last week, I was struck by an advert I heard on a commercial station that began by informing people of how they could create an extra income out of their second homes and ended by saying, 'Take action now in order to avoid the extra council tax on second homes.' Will the First Minister agree with me that it is morally repugnant for companies or businesses to be offering this kind of advice? It is something that creates a situation where tax can be avoided and it encourages people to buy second homes in order to rent them out to holidaymakers, thus, of course, creating a situation where young people particularly can't afford to live in their own rural communities. Does the First Minister share my abhorrence of the message that that advert gave and will he condemn any attempts to try to get around the law?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, wrth wrando ar y radio yr wythnos diwethaf, cefais fy nharo gan hysbyseb a glywais ar orsaf fasnachol a ddechreuodd drwy roi gwybod i bobl sut y gallen nhw greu incwm ychwanegol o'u hail gartrefi ac a ddaeth i ben trwy ddweud, 'Cymerwch gamau nawr i osgoi'r dreth gyngor ychwanegol ar ail gartrefi.' A wnaiff y Prif Weinidog gytuno â mi ei bod yn foesol wrthun i gwmnïau neu fusnesau gynnig cyngor o'r math hwn? Mae'n rhywbeth sy'n creu sefyllfa lle gellir osgoi treth ac mae'n annog pobl i brynu ail gartrefi er mwyn eu gosod i bobl ar eu gwyliau, a thrwy hynny, wrth gwrs, creu sefyllfa lle na all pobl ifanc yn arbennig fforddio byw yn eu cymunedau gwledig eu hunain. A yw'r Prif Weinidog yn rhannu fy atgasedd at y neges a roddodd yr hysbyseb hwnnw ac a wnaiff ef gondemnio unrhyw ymdrechion i geisio osgoi'r gyfraith?
English: As much as I would like to have joined in that discussion, I will ask my own question.
Welsh: Gymaint â dwi eisiau ymuno yn y drafodaeth yna, mi ofynnaf i fy nghwestiwn i.
English: Thank you for the question. The free swimming initiative has not ended. Following an independent review commissioned by the Sports Council for Wales, it has been revised. The new version will provide more opportunities for young people and the over-60s from the more disadvantaged areas of Wales.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiwn. Wrth gwrs, dyw'r fenter nofio am ddim heb ddod i ben. Yn dilyn adolygiad annibynnol a gafodd ei gomisiynu gan Gyngor Chwaraeon Cymru, mae wedi cael ei ddiwygio. Bydd y fersiwn newydd yn rhoi mwy o gyfleoedd i bobl ifanc a'r rhai dros 60 oed yn ardaloedd mwyaf difreintiedig Cymru.
English: The current scheme has come to an end, of course, and there are implications to that. Rightly or wrongly, the free swimming scheme has become a crucial part of how local government pays for its leisure services, because of the unsustainable cuts that have taken place in funding. Now, free swimming funding in Anglesey, for example, is cut in half by the decision to revise and, quite simply, the council won't be able to afford to fill that gap of £30,000 - some 20,000 people per annum take advantage of this, and that figure will go down. First, we must have a commitment of real additional funding for councils next year, but, on the specific issue, given the preventative value of free swimming in improving health today, tackling obesity today, in order to prevent ill health and to save money for the NHS tomorrow, will the First Minister admit that revising this programme and cutting the budget so much is sure to lead to a reduction in the number of users and is contrary to the principles of the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015?
Welsh: Mae'r cynllun presennol wedi dod i ben, wrth gwrs, ac mae yna oblygiadau i hynny. Yn gam neu yn gymwys, mae'r cynllun nofio am ddim wedi dod yn rhan allweddol o sut mae llywodraeth leol yn talu am eu gwasanaethau hamdden oherwydd y toriadau anghynaliadwy sydd wedi bod mewn cyllid. Rŵan, mae cyllid nofio am ddim Ynys Môn, er enghraifft, yn cael ei dorri yn ei hanner gan y penderfyniad i ddiwygio, a fydd y cyngor, yn syml iawn, ddim yn gallu fforddio llenwi'r gap o £30,000 - mae ryw 20,000 o bobl y flwyddyn sy'n manteisio ar hwn. Mae'r ffigur yn mynd i fynd lawr. Rŵan, yn gyntaf, mae'n rhaid inni gael ymrwymiad o gyllid ychwanegol go iawn i gynghorau yn y flwyddyn nesaf, ond, ar y mater penodol yma, o ystyried gwerth ataliol nofio am ddim yn gwella iechyd heddiw, yn taclo gordewdra heddiw, er mwyn atal afiechydon ac arbed arian i'r NHS yfory, a wnaiff y Prif Weinidog gyfaddef bod diwygio y cynllun yma a thorri'r gyllideb gymaint yn siŵr o arwain at ostyngiad yn nifer y defnyddwyr, ac felly yn groes i egwyddorion Deddf Llesiant Cenedlaethau'r Dyfodol (Cymru) 2015?
English: Well, I don't believe that the evidence demonstrates that to be true, Llywydd.
Welsh: Wel, dwi ddim yn meddwl bod y dystiolaeth yn dangos bod hwnna'n wir, Llywydd.
English: It was right to reform the scheme. When the scheme was first introduced in 2004-05, over 800,000 swims took place by young people under the scheme. Last year, it had fallen to 126,000. If you don't think that those figures deserved a review, then I don't think that would be a fair conclusion to draw. And yet the number of swims by young people has gone up in Wales over that period. So, the idea that, by removing the scheme as it currently stands, it automatically leads to the unintended, and, as I see it, not to be realised consequences, doesn't stand up to examination. More people under the age of 16 are swimming in Wales than ever before, and yet fewer and fewer and fewer of them were taking advantage of the free swimming initiative. The money that is not being devoted by the sports council of Wales to this scheme is being spent by them instead on a series of healthy and active fund projects. Four of those new projects will be happening on the island of Anglesey. It's not that money is being taken away from these purposes; it's just that it's going to be spent in a different way, precisely in order to deliver the sorts of outcomes that Rhun ap Iorwerth referred to in his supplementary question.
Welsh: Roedd yn iawn i ddiwygio'r cynllun. Pan gyflwynwyd y cynllun gyntaf yn 2004-05, nofiodd pobl ifanc 800,000 o weithiau o dan y cynllun. Y llynedd, roedd wedi gostwng i 126,000. Os nad ydych chi'n credu bod y ffigurau hynny'n haeddu cael eu hadolygu, yna nid wyf i'n credu y byddai hwnnw'n gasgliad teg. Ac eto, mae'r nifer o weithiau y mae pobl ifanc yn nofio wedi cynyddu yng Nghymru yn ystod y cyfnod hwnnw. Felly, nid yw'r syniad bod dileu'r cynllun fel y mae ar hyn o bryd yn arwain yn awtomatig at y canlyniadau anfwriadol, ac, fel y gwelaf i, rhai na fydd yn cael eu gwireddu, yn gwrthsefyll archwiliad. Mae mwy o bobl o dan 16 oed yn nofio yng Nghymru nag erioed o'r blaen, ac eto roedd llai a llai a llai ohonyn nhw yn manteisio ar y fenter nofio am ddim. Mae'r arian nad yw'n cael ei neilltuo gan gyngor chwaraeon Cymru i'r cynllun hwn yn cael ei wario ganddyn nhw yn hytrach ar gyfres o brosiectau cronfa iach a gweithgar. Bydd pedwar o'r prosiectau newydd hynny yn digwydd ar Ynys Môn. Nid yw'r arian hwnnw'n cael ei gymryd oddi wrth y dibenion hyn; dim ond ei fod yn mynd i gael ei wario mewn ffordd wahanol, yn union er mwyn sicrhau'r mathau o ganlyniadau y cyfeiriodd Rhun ap Iorwerth atynt yn ei gwestiwn atodol.
English: Thank you, First Minister. The next item is questions to the Counsel General and Brexit Minister in respect of his law officer responsibilities. And the first question is from Janet Finch-Saunders.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Prif Weinidog. Yr eitem nesaf yw'r cwestiynau i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol a'r Gweinidog Brexit mewn perthynas â'i gyfrifoldebau fel swyddog cyfreithiol. Ac mae'r cwestiwn cyntaf gan Janet Finch-Saunders.
English: Presiding Officer, I understand that you've given permission for questions 1 and 3 to be grouped. I refer the Members to the written statements that I published yesterday and on 2 September. I intervened in the case because it is appropriate, necessary and proportionate to do so in order to safeguard the interests of Wales and this Assembly.
Welsh: Llywydd, rwy'n deall eich bod chi wedi rhoi caniatâd i gwestiynau 1 a 3 gael eu grwpio. Cyfeiriaf yr Aelodau at y datganiadau ysgrifenedig a gyhoeddais ddoe ac ar 2 Medi. Ymyrrais i yn yr achos gan ei bod yn briodol, yn angenrheidiol ac yn gymesur gwneud hynny er mwyn diogelu buddiannau Cymru a'r Cynulliad hwn.
English: Twice your Welsh Government has teamed up with an individual - Gina Miller - to challenge the actions of our UK Government. Most recently, you have intervened in legal proceedings in the High Court, supporting the legal case against the Prime Minister's advice to the Queen to prorogue Parliament. You claimed that you did not make the intervention lightly and stated: 'As the law officer, I have a duty to uphold the rule of law and the constitution'. Now, whilst I appreciate that the matter is before the Supreme Court now, the High Court concluded that the decision of the Prime Minister was not capable of challenge. Will you therefore disclose to this Chamber how much of our taxpayers' money has been spent by the Welsh Government in your attempts to subvert the very source of our democratic sovereignty?
Welsh: Ddwywaith y mae eich Llywodraeth chi yng Nghymru wedi ymuno ag unigolyn - Gina Miller - i herio gweithredoedd Llywodraeth y DU. Yn fwyaf diweddar, rydych chi wedi ymyrryd mewn achosion cyfreithiol yn yr Uchel Lys, gan gefnogi'r achos cyfreithiol yn erbyn cyngor y Prif Weinidog i'r Frenhines addoedi'r Senedd. Roeddech chi'n honni nad oeddech chi wedi gwneud yr ymyriad yn ddifeddwl ac fe wnaethoch chi ddweud: Fel swyddog y gyfraith, mae gennyf ddyletswydd i gynnal rheolaeth y gyfraith a'r cyfansoddiad. Er fy mod yn sylweddoli bod y mater gerbron y Goruchaf Lys ar hyn o bryd, daeth yr Uchel Lys i'r casgliad nad oedd modd herio penderfyniad y Prif Weinidog. Felly, a wnewch chi ddatgelu i'r Siambr hon faint o arian ein trethdalwyr sydd wedi'i wario gan Lywodraeth Cymru yn eich ymdrechion i danseilio ffynhonnell ein sofraniaeth ddemocrataidd?
English: Well, I think the Member fundamentally misunderstands the situation. The Welsh Government hasn't teamed up with anyone. As law officer, I have intervened in these proceedings, and I have had permission to do so by -
Welsh: Wel, rwyf yn credu bod yr Aelod yn camddeall y sefyllfa yn sylfaenol. Nid yw Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ymuno â neb. Fel swyddog y gyfraith, rwyf wedi ymyrryd yn y trafodion hyn, ac rwyf wedi cael caniatâd i wneud hynny gan -
English: How much has that cost?
Welsh: Faint gostiodd hynny?
English: - the High Court and the Supreme Court. The Member may remember that the last time the Welsh Government intervened in a Miller case the Supreme Court found in favour of Miller, because the Supreme Court understood that the actions of the UK Government were designed to sideline Parliament. Those circumstances are the circumstances we face today, with a new Prime Minister seeking to sideline Parliament at exactly the time when Parliament should be sitting to scrutinise his actions and the Government's actions, and also to pass legislation to prevent the catastrophe of a 'no deal' Brexit. So, I make no apology for intervening on behalf of this Assembly. And Members here have sat and debated and considered legislation and asked Parliament to legislate on our behalf in order to ensure as smooth as possible a legislative statue book after Brexit.
Welsh: - yr Uchel Lys a'r Goruchaf Lys. Efallai bod yr Aelod yn cofio y tro diwethaf i Lywodraeth Cymru ymyrryd mewn achos Miller roedd y Goruchaf Lys o blaid Miller, oherwydd deallodd y Goruchaf Lys fod gweithredoedd Llywodraeth y DU wedi'u cynllunio i wthio'r Senedd i'r cyrion. Yr amgylchiadau hynny yw'r un amgylchiadau yr ydym ni yn eu hwynebu heddiw, a Phrif Weinidog newydd sy'n ceisio gwthio'r Senedd i'r cyrion ar yr union adeg pan ddylai'r Senedd fod yn eistedd i graffu ar ei weithredoedd a gweithredoedd y Llywodraeth, a hefyd i basio deddfwriaeth i atal trychineb Brexit 'dim cytundeb'. Felly, nid wyf yn ymddiheuro am ymyrryd ar ran y Cynulliad hwn. Ac mae'r Aelodau yma wedi eistedd a dadlau ac ystyried deddfwriaeth a gofyn i'r Senedd ddeddfu ar ein rhan er mwyn sicrhau bod y llyfr statud deddfwriaethol mor ddidrafferth â phosibl ar ôl Brexit.
English: How much?
Welsh: Faint?
English: And that opportunity has been denied Parliament to sit and consider that legislation by the prorogation. So, I make no apology at all for standing up for the rights of this Assembly. She shouts at me from a sedentary position the question of costs. The costs of intervening in the High Court stage were £8,937.91 plus VAT - with apologies to Mark Reckless for the question he'll be asking me later.
Welsh: A gwrthodwyd y cyfle hwnnw i'r Senedd eistedd ac ystyried y ddeddfwriaeth honno gan yr addoediad. Felly, nid wyf yn ymddiheuro o gwbl am sefyll dros hawliau'r Cynulliad hwn. Mae hi'n gweiddi cwestiwn am gostau oddi ar ei heistedd. Costau ymyrryd yng nghyfnod yr Uchel Lys oedd £8,937.91 yn ogystal â TAW - gydag ymddiheuriadau i Mark Reckless am y cwestiwn y bydd yn ei ofyn i mi yn nes ymlaen.
English: The Scottish Court of Session found that Boris Johnson misled the Queen about his reasons for wanting to prorogue Parliament. The Prime Minister had said that it was so that a Queen's Speech could be introduced, but the judgment made it clear that there was documented evidence that the true reason was to stymie parliamentary scrutiny of the Executive. The English High Court did not contradict this, so there is no debate about whether Boris Johnson lied to the Queen and everybody else about the true nature of his reasons for proroguing Parliament - he did. The point at which the judgment of the High Court differed to the Court of Session was about whether lying about the reasons for prorogation is justiciable or not - that is, whether it's a legal or a political matter. Is the Counsel General in a position to explain his legal basis for believing that this is a justiciable matter and whether, if the Supreme Court finds in his favour, a judgment that prorogation is unlawful in this instance will be enforceable? I ask because of the briefings from No. 10 that they may seek to prorogue Parliament for a second time, regardless.
Welsh: Canfu Llys Sesiwn yr Alban fod Boris Johnson wedi camarwain y Frenhines ynglŷn â'i resymau dros eisiau i'r Senedd gael ei haddoedi. Dywedodd y Prif Weinidog mai er mwyn cyflwyno Araith y Frenhines oedd hynny, ond gwnaethpwyd hi'n glir gan y dyfarniad fod tystiolaeth ddogfennol i'r perwyl mai'r gwir reswm oedd rhwystro gwaith craffu seneddol ar y Weithrediaeth. Nid oedd yr Uchel Lys yn Lloegr yn gwrth-ddweud hyn, felly nid oes dadl ynghylch a oedd Boris Johnson yn dweud celwydd wrth y Frenhines a phawb arall am wir natur ei resymau dros addoedi'r Senedd - fe wnaeth hynny. Roedd y pwynt lle'r oedd barn yr Uchel Lys yn amrywio o Lys y Sesiwn yn ymwneud â pha un a oedd dweud celwydd am y rhesymau y tu ôl i'r addoediad yn gyfiawn ai peidio - hynny yw, a yw'n fater cyfreithiol neu wleidyddol. A yw'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol mewn sefyllfa i esbonio ei sail gyfreithiol dros gredu bod hwn yn fater y gellir ei farnu, os yw'r Goruchaf Lys yn dyfarnu o'i blaid, y bydd, yn yr achos hwn, dyfarniad bod addoediad yn anghyfreithlon yn bosibl ei orfodi? Rwy'n gofyn oherwydd y briffiau gan Rhif 10 y gallen nhw geisio addoedi'r Senedd am yr eildro, beth bynnag.
English: I thank the Member for that supplementary question. She is right, of course, to point out that the Court of Session in Scotland concluded that, whatever the reasons the Prime Minister gave publicly for seeking the prorogation, the actual reason was to stymie, as they put it, Parliament's consideration, which they concluded to be constitutionally unacceptable and unlawful. She is right to say that, for both the High Court and the Court of Session in Scotland, the question of justiciability was at the heart of their considerations. The submissions made on my behalf in the Supreme Court will say that the divisional court - the High Court - was incorrect in its conclusion, and that the Court of Session was correct, in the way that both courts approach the question of justiciability, i.e. that Executive action shouldn't be undertaken other than in accordance with public law standards, and, where political subject matter is a basis for judicial restraint, it isn't a basis for Executive immunity, and those are some of the submissions that will be made on my behalf in the Supreme Court later this week. On the question of the conclusions of the Supreme Court, I will say clearly now that this Government will abide by whatever the Supreme Court concludes, as would any Government worthy of that name, and I hope that the evasion that the Prime Minister has shown on that question, on reflection, he will realise is inappropriate, and that he will act in accordance with the outcome of the Supreme Court's judgment, as soon as it's given.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn atodol hwnnw. Mae hi'n iawn, wrth gwrs, i dynnu sylw at y ffaith bod Llys Sesiwn yr Alban wedi dod i'r casgliad, mai beth bynnag oedd y rhesymau a roddodd y Prif Weinidog i'r cyhoedd am geisio'r addoediad, y gwir reswm oedd rhwystro, yn eu geiriau nhw, ystyriaeth y Senedd, a daethant i'r casgliad bod hynny'n annerbyniol yn gyfansoddiadol ac yn anghyfreithlon. Mae hi'n iawn i ddweud, o ran yr Uchel Lys a Llys Sesiwn yr Alban, mai'r cwestiwn o farnadwyedd oedd wrth wraidd eu hystyriaethau. Bydd y cyflwyniadau a wneir ar fy rhan yn y Goruchaf Lys yn dweud bod y llys adrannol - yr Uchel Lys - yn anghywir yn ei gasgliad, a bod Llys y Sesiwn yn gywir, yn y ffordd y mae'r ddau lys yn ymdrin â chwestiwn cyfiawnder, h.y. ni ddylid cymryd camau gweithredol ac eithrio yn unol â safonau cyfraith gyhoeddus, a phan fo pwnc gwleidyddol yn sail ataliaeth farnwrol, nid yw'n sail imiwnedd gweithredol, a dyna rai o'r cyflwyniadau a fydd yn cael eu gwneud ar fy rhan yn y Goruchaf Lys yn ddiweddarach yr wythnos hon. Ynghylch y cwestiwn o gasgliadau'r Goruchaf Lys, dywedaf yn glir yn awr y bydd y Llywodraeth hon yn cadw at beth bynnag yw casgliad y Goruchaf Lys, fel y byddai unrhyw Lywodraeth sy'n deilwng o'r enw, a gobeithiaf y bydd y Prif Weinidog yn sylweddoli bod yr osgoi a ddangosodd ar y cwestiwn hwnnw, ar ôl ystyried, yn amhriodol, ac y bydd ef yn gweithredu yn unol â chanlyniad dyfarniad y Goruchaf Lys, cyn gynted ag y'i rhoddir.