English: I'd also like to place on record my thanks to Ruth Hussey and her team for the way they conducted this review. And I think it has been a very timely look at the state of health and social care in Wales. I would say that, in that Plaid Cymru pushed the agenda on having this parliamentary review, and we've been only too pleased to play our part in being part of a discussion panel, every now and then, as the work progressed, to get to the point where we have now this report, which is food for thought. And I'll keep my questions fairly brief. I won't ask a long list of questions today, because I think the publication of this parliamentary review report is the start of a process. Now that we have the fruits of the labour of Ruth Hussey and her team, we have things and yardsticks that we can hold to Government to see how Government responds. I think the central strength of what we have here is that statement in this report that we do not have a vision for the future of health and social care in Wales. And it's not overly egging a political point in saying that it is implicit, in that that there's an indictment of a governing party that has controlled the NHS in Wales for the best part of 19 years and still we don't have a vision. The urgency is shown in the timescale that Ruth Hussey wants to see the Government responding in. She wants to see now a consultation and a vision being published within a matter of three months. So, the first question is: could you give us an idea of the level of consultation that Government will engage in in order to bring forth that vision? There are some specific elements where Ruth Hussey says she would like to see the patient voice being heard much clearer in decisions on the future of healthcare. The second question: how does that and the idea that the patient experience must be measured very, very well and carefully tally with proposals that Government has made on the abolition of community health councils, which is the body that measures patient experience specifically? Will you, therefore, put those plans on the shelf, because we have in this report a clear, clear suggestion that patient experience must still be measured in future? On workforce, I will make the comment that whilst here we have a call for a new vision, that new vision will involve implementing things that many of us have long called for, for example, making sure that we train adequately enough doctors. Therefore, I'd be interested in your comments on whether you now will be accelerating moves, for example, towards the establishment of a medical training centre in Bangor, because we have in this report emphasis on the need to make sure we have adequate and well-trained workers. On money, yes, the financing of the NHS was not part of the remit, but I do remember Plaid Cymru being ridiculed before the last election for suggesting that £300 million-worth of savings, if you like, could be made through better use of technology and innovation within the NHS in order to re-invest in spending that money better within the health service. So, I'd be interested in your comments on that. So, this is a starting point, and I look forward to being told also by Government how we can measure whether Government is succeeding in responding to this important report. What will be the measure of success?
Welsh: Hoffwn i hefyd gofnodi fy niolch i Ruth Hussey a'i thîm am y ffordd y cynhaliwyd yr adolygiad hwn. Ac rwy'n meddwl ei fod wedi rhoi golwg amserol iawn ar gyflwr iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol yng Nghymru. Byddwn yn dweud hynny, gan fod Plaid Cymru wedi gwthio'r agenda o ran cynnal yr adolygiad seneddol hwn, ac rydym wedi bod yn falch iawn o chwarae ein rhan a bod yn rhan o banel trafod, bob hyn a hyn, wrth i'r gwaith fynd rhagddo, i gyrraedd y pwynt lle mae gennym nawr yr adroddiad hwn, sy'n achos meddwl. Ac rwy'n mynd i gadw fy nghwestiynau'n eithaf byr. Ni wnaf ofyn rhestr hir o gwestiynau heddiw, oherwydd rwy'n meddwl bod cyhoeddi'r adroddiad adolygiad seneddol hwn yn ddechrau proses. Nawr bod gennym ffrwyth llafur Ruth Hussey a'i thîm, mae gennym bethau a ffyn mesur y gallwn eu defnyddio i farnu sut y mae'r Llywodraeth yn ymateb. Rwy'n meddwl mai cryfder ganolog yr hyn sydd gennym yma yw'r datganiad hwnnw yn yr adroddiad hwn nad oes gennym weledigaeth ar gyfer dyfodol iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol yng Nghymru. Ac nid gorwneud pwynt gwleidyddol yw dweud ei fod yn ymhlyg, bod hynny'n gondemniad o'r blaid sy'n llywodraethu ac sydd wedi rheoli'r GIG yng Nghymru ers bron i 19 mlynedd ac sy'n dal i fod heb weledigaeth. Mae'r amserlen y mae Ruth Hussey wedi'i nodi ar gyfer ymateb gan y Llywodraeth yn dangos y brys. Mae hi eisiau gweld ymgynghoriad nawr a chyhoeddi gweledigaeth o fewn mater o dri mis. Felly, y cwestiwn cyntaf yw: a wnewch chi roi syniad inni o lefel yr ymgynghori y bydd y Llywodraeth yn ei ddefnyddio er mwyn llunio'r weledigaeth honno? Ceir rhai elfennau penodol lle mae Ruth Hussey yn dweud yr hoffai weld llais y claf yn cael ei glywed yn llawer cliriach mewn penderfyniadau am ddyfodol gofal iechyd. Yr ail gwestiwn: sut y mae hynny a'r syniad bod yn rhaid mesur profiad y claf yn dda iawn, iawn ac yn ofalus yn cyd-fynd â chynigion y Llywodraeth i ddiddymu cynghorau iechyd cymuned, sef y corff sy'n mesur profiad y claf yn benodol? A wnewch chi, felly, roi'r cynlluniau hynny ar y silff, oherwydd bod yr adroddiad hwn yn rhoi awgrym clir, clir bod yn rhaid dal i fesur profiad y claf yn y dyfodol? O ran gweithlu, gwnaf y sylw, er ein bod ni yma wedi galw am weledigaeth newydd, y bydd y weledigaeth newydd honno'n cynnwys gwneud pethau y mae llawer ohonom wedi galw amdanyn nhw ers amser, er enghraifft, gwneud yn siŵr ein bod yn hyfforddi digon o feddygon yn ddigonol. Felly, byddai gennyf ddiddordeb yn eich sylwadau ynghylch a fyddwch chi nawr yn cyflymu symudiadau, er enghraifft, tuag at sefydlu canolfan hyfforddiant meddygol ym Mangor, oherwydd mae'r adroddiad hwn yn pwysleisio'r angen i wneud yn siŵr bod gennym ddigon o weithwyr a'u bod wedi'u hyfforddi'n dda. O ran arian, iawn, doedd ariannu'r GIG ddim yn rhan o'r cylch gwaith, ond rwy'n cofio Plaid Cymru yn cael eu gwawdio cyn yr etholiad diwethaf am awgrymu y gellid arbed gwerth £300 miliwn, os mynnwch chi, drwy ddefnyddio technoleg ac arloesedd yn well o fewn y GIG er mwyn ail-fuddsoddi mewn gwario'r arian hwnnw'n well o fewn y gwasanaeth iechyd. Felly, byddai gennyf ddiddordeb yn eich sylwadau ar hynny. Felly, mae hwn yn fan cychwyn, ac rwy'n edrych ymlaen at gael gwybod hefyd gan y Llywodraeth sut y gallwn ni fesur a yw'r Llywodraeth yn llwyddo i ymateb i'r adroddiad pwysig hwn. Sut y caiff llwyddiant ei fesur?