English: Well, obviously, if we had more money then we'd be able to do more things. Of course, I fully accept that. But the idea that the UK Government could just ignore the financial inheritance that it had from the Labour Government in 2010 is absurd. Just look at the figures. Since Gordon Brown took the brakes off public spending in 2001, everything went haywire. The Labour Government failed to mend the roof whilst the sun was shining. In 2001 - [ Interruption.] Because in the first Labour Government - [ Interruption.] No, I won't because I'm answering - I've got to finish answering this intervention before I accept another one. The first Labour Government of Tony Blair of course followed Kenneth Clarke's spending plans, and actually public spending fell during that Labour Government as a percentage of gross domestic product. And then from 2001 it rose relentlessly, from 27 per cent in 2001 to 50 per cent of GDP by the time the financial crisis hit. So, the room for manoeuvre for dealing with the financial crisis was therefore substantially reduced. And Government spending, as a proportion of GDP, rose from 35 per cent in 2000 to 40 per cent in 2009, to 45 per cent to 2012. The idea that this could simply be ignored and there wouldn't have to be some kind of tightening of the belt because of the overspending earlier on is just wholly unrealistic. So, the big problem that we've got here is, yes, there isn't enough money, but how are we going to get more money? The only way we'll get more money is by harbouring the resources that we've got and diverting from some spending priorities to others. If the Government spends £150 million, nearly, on a planning inquiry on the M4, which then doesn't take place, that is a waste of money, and there are all sorts of other wastes of money that we could name as well. [ Interruption.] I haven't got much time, but I will give way.
Welsh: Wel, yn amlwg, pe bai gennym fwy o arian, byddem yn gallu gwneud mwy o bethau. Rwy'n derbyn hynny'n llwyr wrth gwrs. Ond mae'r syniad y gallai Llywodraeth y DU anwybyddu'r gwaddol ariannol a gafodd gan y Llywodraeth Lafur yn 2010 yn hurt. Edrychwch ar y ffigurau. Ers i Gordon Brown dynnu'r breciau oddi ar wariant cyhoeddus yn 2001, aeth popeth yn gawl potsh. Ni lwyddodd y Llywodraeth Lafur i drwsio'r to tra oedd yr haul yn tywynnu. Yn 2001 - [ T orri ar draws.] Oherwydd yn y Llywodraeth Lafur gyntaf - [ T orri ar draws.] Na, ni wnaf oherwydd fy mod i'n ateb - rhaid i mi orffen ateb yr ymyriad hwn cyn i mi dderbyn un arall. Dilynodd Llywodraeth Lafur gyntaf Tony Blair gynlluniau gwariant Kenneth Clarke wrth gwrs, ac mewn gwirionedd disgynnodd gwariant cyhoeddus yn ystod y Llywodraeth Lafur honno fel canran o gynnyrch domestig gros. Ac yna o 2001 ymlaen, fe gododd yn ddi-baid, o 27 y cant yn 2001 i 50 y cant o'r cynnyrch domestig gros erbyn i'r argyfwng ariannol daro. Felly, roedd llawer llai o le i symud er mwyn ymdopi â'r argyfwng ariannol. A chynyddodd gwariant y Llywodraeth, fel cyfran o gynnyrch domestig gros, o 35 y cant yn 2000 i 40 y cant yn 2009, i 45 y cant yn 2012. Mae'r syniad y gellid anwybyddu hyn ac na fyddai'n rhaid tynhau'r gwregys mewn rhyw fodd oherwydd y gorwario cynharach yn hollol afrealistig. Felly, y broblem fawr sydd gennym yma yw, ie, nid oes digon o arian, ond sut y cawn ragor o arian? Yr unig ffordd y cawn ragor o arian yw drwy gadw'r adnoddau sydd gennym a'u dargyfeirio o rai blaenoriaethau gwario i rai eraill. Os yw'r Llywodraeth yn gwario bron £150 miliwn ar ymchwiliad cynllunio ar yr M4, nad yw'n digwydd wedyn, mae hwnnw'n wastraff arian, a cheir pob math o wastraff arian arall y gallem ei enwi hefyd. [ Torri ar draws.] Nid oes gennyf lawer o amser, ond fe ildiaf.