English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. I started this debate by encouraging Members to acknowledge the fact that this motion was no call on us not to take action, and certainly I am not looking to not introduce regulations and to ignore the problem. Unfortunately, the Minister's comments in response to the debate show me that she hasn't listened to a word I've said, and that's disappointing. I thought better of her, to be honest. And to make such accusations about me, I take that as a very grave insult, and I am saddened she felt the need to do that. I don't know how many times I have to say that I am serious about taking action on this problem. The challenge for me, of course, is that what we have here today, in my view, isn't going to deliver the outcomes that we want to see. Now, the Minister said that she'd made an offer to the industry to bring solutions forward. Well, she may recall that the industry did present her with two reports, including recommendations on the way forward - one in April 2018 and one in March of last year. They are still awaiting the Minister's response to those proposals. So, let her not say that she's given the sector an opportunity to respond. She has not, and that is misleading, because she has ignored what has been proposed to her. Now, I would support these regulations if I believed that they were going to work, but there are so many questions about unintended consequences in environmental terms, the detrimental impact that they will have on the future of farms, the likelihood that it will lead to the loss of some of our family farms and the broader impact that that will have on the rural economy and communities in rural Wales. Portraying this argument as a choice between regulating or not regulating doesn't fairly describe the choice that we have before us today. What supporting this annulment motion would do would be to ensure that the Government takes a step back to look at alternative options that will bring better outcomes for the environment and less destruction to the economy and rural communities. I am willing to play my part in that. The question is: are you?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Dirprwy Lywydd. Mi wnes i gychwyn y ddadl yma drwy annog Aelodau i gydnabod y ffaith nad oedd y cynnig yma yn rhyw fath o alwad inni beidio â gweithredu, a dyw'r cynnig yma'n sicr ddim yn alwad arnom ni i beidio â chyflwyno rheoliadau ac i anwybyddu'r broblem. Yn anffodus, mae sylwadau'r Gweinidog wrth gloi'r ddadl wedi dangos ei bod hi heb wrando gair ar beth ddywedais i, ac mae hynny'n siom i mi. Rôn i'n meddwl gwell ohoni, a bod yn onest. Ac i daflu rhyw fath o honiadau o'r fath i fy nghyfeiriad i, dwi'n cymryd hynny fel insult difrifol, a dwi yn drist ei bod hi wedi teimlo bod angen gwneud hynny. Dwi ddim yn gwybod faint o weithiau dwi yn gorfod dweud fy mod i o ddifrif ynglŷn â gweithredu ar y broblem yma. Yr her i fi, wrth gwrs, yw dyw yr hyn sydd ger ein bron ni ddim yn fy marn i yn mynd i gyflawni'r canlyniadau rŷn ni eisiau eu gweld. Nawr, mi ddywedodd y Gweinidog ei bod hi wedi rhoi cynnig i'r diwydiant i ddod â datrysiadau gerbron. Wel, efallai bydd hi'n cofio bod y diwydiant wedi cyflwyno dau adroddiad iddi yn cynnwys argymhellion ynglŷn â'r ffordd ymlaen - yn yn Ebrill 2018, un ym Mawrth y flwyddyn diwethaf. Mae'n nhw'n dal i aros am ymateb gan y Gweinidog i'r cynigion hynny. Felly, peidied hi â dweud ei bod hi wedi rhoi cyfle i'r sector i ymateb. Dyw hi ddim, ac mae hynny yn gamarweiniol, oherwydd mae hi wedi anwybyddu'r hyn sydd wedi cael ei gynnig iddi. Nawr, mi fuaswn i yn cefnogi'r rheoliadau yma petawn i'n credu eu bod nhw am weithio, ond mae yna gymaint o gwestiynau am y canlyniadau amgylcheddol anfwriadol ddaw yn eu sgil nhw, am yr effaith andwyol y byddan nhw'n eu cael ar ddyfodol ffermydd yng Nghymru, y tebygrwydd y bydd e yn arwain at golli rhai o'n ffermydd teuluol ni a'r effaith ehangach y bydd hynny'n ei gael, wrth gwrs, ar yr economi wledig ac ar gymdeithas yng nghefn gwlad. Dyw portreadu'r ddadl yma fel dewis rhwng rheoleiddio neu beidio â rheoleiddio ddim yn disgrifio yn deg y dewis sydd o'n blaenau ni mewn gwirionedd y prynhawn yma. Yr hyn fyddai cefnogi'r cynnig yma yn ei wneud yw sicrhau bod y Llywodraeth yn cymryd cam yn ôl i edrych ar yr opsiynau amgen fydd yn dod â gwell canlyniadau i'r amgylchedd a llai o ddinistr i'r economi a chymunedau gwledig. Dwi'n barod i chwarae fy rhan i yn hynny o beth. Y cwestiwn yw: ydych chi?