techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, Llywydd, let me say that I regret the fact that the House of Commons was unable to find a majority for any of the propositions put in front of it last night. I was very glad that Plaid Cymru and the Labour Party - that our positions in the House of Commons was to support both common market 2.0 and the proposition that Adam Price has referred to, because that is entirely consistent with the position that the Welsh Government has advocated over recent weeks and months. The message I want to give to Members of Parliament of all parties is this: we face the most serious moment in this whole Brexit journey, where the risk of crashing out of the European Union without a deal, with all the catastrophic impacts that we know that Sir Mark Sedwill has warned the UK Cabinet about this morning, that those risks would become realities for people in Wales. And faced with those realities, what I urge Members of Parliament to do is not to go on simply being willing to support the one option that is the closest one to their preference, but to be willing to vote in favour of a range of possible possibilities that mitigate that risk and that lead us to a form of Brexit, or a second referendum, that would be able to protect the interests of people not just in Wales, but across the United Kingdom.
Welsh: Wel, Llywydd, gadewch i mi ddweud fy mod i'n gresynu at y ffaith na lwyddodd Tŷ'r Cyffredin i ddod o hyd i fwyafrif dros unrhyw un o'r cynigion a roddwyd ger ei fron neithiwr. Roeddwn i'n falch iawn bod Plaid Cymru a'r Blaid Lafur - mai ein safbwyntiau yn Nhŷ'r Cyffredin oedd cefnogi marchnad gyffredin 2.0 a'r cynnig y mae Adam Price wedi cyfeirio ato, oherwydd mae hwnnw'n gwbl gyson â'r safbwynt y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ei hyrwyddo dros yr wythnosau a'r misoedd diwethaf. Y neges yr hoffwn i ei roi i Aelodau Seneddol o bob plaid yw hon: rydym ni'n wynebu'r adeg fwyaf difrifol yn y daith Brexit gyfan hon, lle ceir perygl o ddisgyn allan o'r Undeb Ewropeaidd heb gytundeb, gyda'r holl effeithiau trychinebus y gwyddom fod Syr Mark Sedwill wedi rhybuddio Cabinet y DU amdanyn nhw y bore yma, y byddai'r risgiau hynny yn troi'n realiti i bobl yng Nghymru. Ac o wynebu'r realiti hwnnw, yr hyn yr wyf i'n ei annog Aelodau Seneddol i'w wneud yw peidio â pharhau i fod yn barod i gefnogi dim ond yr un dewis sydd agosaf i'w dymuniad nhw, ond i fod yn barod i bleidleisio o blaid amrywiaeth o bosibiliadau sy'n lliniaru'r risg honno ac sy'n ein harwain at fath o Brexit neu ail refferendwm, a fyddai'n gallu diogelu buddiannau pobl nid yn unig yng Nghymru, ond ledled y Deyrnas Unedig.
English: I note the First Minister didn't respond to my specific question, and I know that it's become normal, of late, for leaders and deputy leaders in the Labour Party to have diametrically opposed views, but I wasn't aware up until now that that malaise now seems to be infecting the Labour Party in Wales. I interpret the fact that he didn't answer that he doesn't have full confidence in the deputy leader of the Labour Party in Wales. He referred to the Cabinet Secretary's letter outlining the consequences of a 'no deal' Brexit. Indeed, you have yourself previously described this scenario as catastrophic. In the light of that, can you say why you and, indeed, your frontbench colleagues at Westminster - in contrast, it has to be said, to a very substantial number of backbench Labour MPs - decided not to support a revocation amendment, which would, at the very least, provide us with an emergency break to prevent the catastrophe that you describe? The Prime Minister this morning has reportedly briefed the Cabinet that if her deal is once more rejected, then the choice will be between no deal and revocation, and in that scenario she prefers no deal. If that is the choice we are facing, possibly in a matter of days, will you and your party continue to oppose revocation when it may be the only lifeline left?
Welsh: Rwy'n sylwi na wnaeth y Prif Weinidog ymateb i fy nghwestiwn penodol, a gwn ei bod wedi dod yn arferol, yn ddiweddar, i arweinwyr a dirprwy arweinwyr yn y Blaid Lafur fod â safbwyntiau cwbl groes, ond nid oeddwn i'n ymwybodol tan nawr ei bod hi'n ymddangos bod yr haint hwnnw yn effeithio ar y Blaid Lafur yng Nghymru erbyn hyn. Rwy'n dehongli'r ffaith na wnaeth ateb nad oes ganddo ffydd llawn yn nirprwy arweinydd y Blaid Lafur yng Nghymru. Cyfeiriodd at lythyr Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn amlinellu canlyniadau Brexit 'dim cytundeb'. Yn wir, rydych chi eich hun wedi disgrifio'r sefyllfa honno fel un drychinebus. Yng ngoleuni hynny, a allwch chi ddweud pam wnaethoch chi ac, yn wir, eich cydweithwyr mainc flaen yn San Steffan - mewn cyferbyniad, mae'n rhaid dweud, â nifer sylweddol iawn o ASau Llafur ar y meinciau cefn - benderfynu peidio â chefnogi gwelliant dirymiad, a fyddai, o leiaf, yn rhoi seibiant brys i ni atal y drychineb yr ydych chi'n ei disgrifio? Mae'n debyg bod Prif Weinidog y DU, y bore yma, wedi briffio'r Cabinet os caiff ei chytundeb ei wrthod unwaith yn rhagor, yna bydd y dewis rhwng dim cytundeb a dirymu, a bod yn well ganddi ddim cytundeb yn y sefyllfa honno. Os mai dyna yw'r dewis yr ydym ni'n ei wynebu, mewn mater o ddyddiau o bosibl, a wnewch chi a'ch plaid barhau i wrthwynebu dirymu pan allai fod yr unig achubiaeth sydd ar ôl?
English: Well, Llywydd, I think the Members of the Assembly will want to consider the deep seriousness of a revocation decision, because the ruling of the European Court of Justice was very clear on what revocation would mean. Revocation cannot be used as a tactic. Revocation cannot be used to buy time for further discussions. The ECJ's ruling said that any member state that used revocation could only do it on the basis that it was - and here's what the court said - 'unequivocal and unconditional'. In other words, revocation would overturn the referendum. It would reverse the referendum without the possibility of going back to ask people in this country what they thought of that decision. It would have to be unequivocal and unconditional. You are removing the intention to leave the European Union in a way that you could not go on to reverse. So, it's really important that people grasp the seriousness of that course of action. Now, Adam Price puts it to me as to what my view, at least, would be if we were in that very final moment where the only choice was between a crash-out Brexit or revocation. Because of the serious impact that a crash-out Brexit would have on people here in Wales, at that point, if I were casting a vote, I would cast it for revocation, because the consequences are so catastrophic for families in Wales. But for me, it would absolutely have to be that we knew we were in that final moment, because the constitutional and political consequences of using that course of action are really very, very profound.
Welsh: Wel, Llywydd, rwy'n credu y bydd Aelodau'r Cynulliad eisiau ystyried difrifoldeb dwfn y penderfyniad o ddirymu, oherwydd roedd dyfarniad Llys Cyfiawnder Ewrop yn eglur iawn ynghylch yr hyn y byddai dirymu yn ei olygu. Ni ellir defnyddio dirymu fel tacteg. Ni ellir defnyddio dirymu i brynu amser ar gyfer trafodaethau pellach. Roedd dyfarniad Llys Cyfiawnder Ewrop yn dweud y gallai unrhyw aelod-wladwriaeth a fyddai'n defnyddio dirymu wneud hynny dim ond ar y sail ei fod - a dyma ddywedodd y llys - yn ddiamwys ac yn ddiamod. Mewn geiriau eraill, byddai dirymiad yn gwyrdroi'r refferendwm. Byddai'n gwrthdroi'r refferendwm heb y posibilrwydd o fynd yn ôl i ofyn i bobl yn y wlad hon beth oedd eu barn ar y penderfyniad hwnnw. Byddai'n rhaid iddo fod yn ddiamwys ac yn ddiamod. Rydych chi'n cael gwared ar y bwriad i adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd mewn ffordd na allech chi fynd ymlaen i'w gwrthdroi. Felly, mae'n bwysig iawn bod pobl yn deall difrifoldeb y cam hwnnw. Nawr, mae Adam Price yn gofyn i mi beth fyddai fy marn, o leiaf, pe byddem ni yn y funud olaf honno pan mai'r unig ddewis fyddai rhwng Brexit disgyn allan neu ddirymu. Oherwydd yr effaith ddifrifol y byddai Brexit disgyn allan yn ei chael ar bobl yma yng Nghymru, ar yr adeg honno, pe byddwn i'n bwrw pleidlais, byddwn yn ei bwrw dros ddirymu, gan fod y canlyniadau mor drychinebus i deuluoedd yng Nghymru. Ond i mi, byddai'n rhaid iddi fod yn sicr ein bod ni'n gwybod ein bod ni yn y funud olaf honno, gan fod canlyniadau cyfansoddiadol a gwleidyddol defnyddio'r cam gweithredu hwnnw yn hynod, hynod ddifrifol.
English: Llywydd, I'm able to answer a number of those questions. First of all, I can confirm that the Welsh Government of course accepts the judgment of the High Court in full. I can confirm that I first became aware of the terms of the judicial review and the issues at stake on it when I was briefed on that matter on becoming First Minister. I can also confirm that I am in the process of receiving substantive advice on what the judgment says and the courses of action available to me. As soon as I'm able to resolve those issues, I will issue a statement to the Assembly setting out my decisions.
Welsh: Llywydd, gallaf ateb nifer o'r cwestiynau yna. Yn gyntaf, gallaf gadarnhau bod Llywodraeth Cymru wrth gwrs yn derbyn dyfarniad yr Uchel Lys yn llawn. Gallaf gadarnhau i mi ddod yn ymwybodol o delerau'r adolygiad barnwrol a'r materion a oedd yn y fantol ynddo gyntaf pan gefais fy mriffio ar y mater hwnnw pan ddeuthum yn Brif Weinidog. Gallaf hefyd gadarnhau fy mod i wrthi'n cael cyngor sylweddol ar yr hyn y mae'r dyfarniad yn ei ddweud a'r camau gweithredu sydd ar gael i mi. Cyn gynted ag y gallaf ddatrys y materion hynny, byddaf yn cyhoeddi datganiad i'r Cynulliad yn nodi fy mhenderfyniadau.
English: Llywydd, this Government has always supported GPs. It's why we have in successive years negotiated successfully new terms and conditions and new contracts with GPs year after year. It's why we provided a significant uplift to the contract last year, and why we wanted to provide a further significant uplift in the contract for next year as well - a 5.4 per cent uplift in 2019-20, well beyond what was available to their counterparts in other parts of the United Kingdom. Our discussions with General Practitioners Committee Wales will resume, we hope, very shortly, and we look forward to agreeing with them further significant investment in GP services in Wales.
Welsh: Llywydd, mae'r Llywodraeth hon wedi cefnogi meddygon teulu erioed. Dyna pam yr ydym ni wedi llwyddo i gytuno telerau ac amodau newydd a chontractau newydd gyda meddygon teulu flwyddyn ar ôl blwyddyn. Dyna pam y darparwyd cynnydd sylweddol gennym i'r contract y llynedd, a pham yr oeddem ni eisiau darparu cynnydd sylweddol arall i'r contract ar gyfer y flwyddyn nesaf hefyd - cynnydd o 5.4 y cant yn 2019-20, ymhell y tu hwnt i'r hyn a oedd ar gael i'w cymheiriaid mewn rhannau eraill o'r Deyrnas Unedig. Bydd ein trafodaethau gyda Phwyllgor Meddygon Teulu Cymru yn ailgychwyn, rydym ni'n gobeithio, yn fuan iawn, ac rydym ni'n edrych ymlaen at gytuno â nhw rhagor o fuddsoddiad sylweddol mewn gwasanaethau meddygon teulu yng Nghymru.
English: Come on, First Minister, you can't ignore what you're being told by GPs. The British Medical Association in Wales spoke out at the weekend with what they called sadness over how recent contract negotiations with your Government had gone. Chairwoman of the general practitioners committee, Charlotte Jones, said that your overall approach to discussions had been disappointing and that the result - I quote - fell well short of a deal where the committee could actually look doctors in the eye and say it was good for the profession. Now, your Minister issued a statement yesterday about the launch of the scheme for general medical practice indemnity, despite it being so loudly rejected by the committee. This same voice says the Welsh Government has failed to support it at a time of crisis. But it's not just GPs, First Minister. We've asked you to act to tackle the drop in the number of midwives in Wales, and now we see recent figures that, despite increasing strains on the NHS, there is a decrease in nursing and health visiting staff numbers, too. Why, First Minister, are people being driven from the healthcare profession here in Wales? What does this mean for the people of the country and what are you doing about it?
Welsh: Dewch, Prif Weinidog, ni allwch chi anwybyddu'r hyn y mae meddygon teulu yn ei ddweud wrthych chi. Lleisiodd Cymdeithas Feddygol Prydain yng Nghymru ei barn dros y penwythnos gyda'r hyn a ddisgrifiwyd ganddi fel tristwch ynghylch sut yr oedd trafodaethau contract gyda'ch Llywodraeth chi wedi mynd rhagddynt. Dywedodd cadeiryddes y pwyllgor meddygon teulu, Charlotte Jones, bod eich dull cyffredinol o ymgymryd â thrafodaethau wedi bod yn siomedig a bod y canlyniad - dyfynnaf - wedi bod ymhell o fod yn gytundeb lle gallai'r pwyllgor edrych i lygaid meddygon a dweud ei fod yn dda ar gyfer y proffesiwn. Nawr, cyhoeddodd eich Gweinidog ddatganiad ddoe ar lansiad y cynllun ar gyfer indemniad ymarfer meddygol cyffredinol, er iddo gael ei wrthod mor bendant gan y pwyllgor. Mae'r un llais hwn yn dweud bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi methu â'i gefnogi ar adeg o argyfwng. Ond nid yw hyn yn berthnasol i feddygon teulu yn unig, Prif Weinidog. Rydym ni wedi gofyn i chi gymryd camau i fynd i'r afael â'r gostyngiad i nifer y bydwragedd yng Nghymru, ac rydym ni'n gweld bellach ffigurau diweddar, er gwaethaf straen gynyddol ar y GIG, bod gostyngiad i niferoedd staff nyrsio ac ymwelwyr iechyd hefyd. Pam, Prif Weinidog, mae pobl yn cael eu gyrru o'r proffesiwn gofal iechyd yma yng Nghymru? Beth mae hyn yn ei olygu i bobl y wlad a beth ydych chi'n ei wneud am y peth?
English: Well, let me give you some figures, First Minister. Recent figures from the national survey show that nearly half of people in Wales admitted to having trouble seeing their GP last year. This number has increased over the years. And your own Minister has actually quoted these figures in a recent statement that he actually issued to this Chamber. Now, despite being warned of this by professional bodies like the British Medical Association and Royal College of General Practitioners Wales, as well as being challenged by us on these benches on several occasions, your party has looked the other way and failed to address this problem. We even saw 15 GP practices close across the country last year. Patient satisfaction figures have slipped over the years, and community doctors are leaving the profession with an almost 20 per cent drop since 2017, forcing practices to close. Now, your Minister may well have put out a recent statement acknowledging that people's expectations are not being met, but it's not good enough, First Minister. How will you here today reassure the people of Wales that your Government supports the continuation of local healthcare in all communities across the country?
Welsh: Wel, gadewch i mi roi rhai ffigurau i chi, Prif Weinidog. Mae ffigurau diweddar o'r arolwg cenedlaethol yn dangos bod bron i hanner y bobl yng Nghymru yn cyfaddef eu bod wedi cael trafferth i weld eu meddyg teulu y llynedd. Mae'r nifer hon wedi cynyddu dros y blynyddoedd. A dyfynnodd eich Gweinidog eich hun y ffigurau hyn mewn datganiad diweddar a gyhoeddwyd ganddo i'r Siambr hon mewn gwirionedd. Nawr, er iddi gael ei rhybuddio am hyn gan gyrff proffesiynol fel Cymdeithas Feddygol Prydain a Choleg Brenhinol yr Ymarferwyr Cyffredinol Cymru, yn ogystal â chael ei herio gennym ni ar y meinciau hyn ar sawl achlysur, mae eich plaid chi wedi anwybyddu hyn i gyd ac wedi methu â mynd i'r afael â'r broblem hon. Gwelsom 15 o feddygfeydd teulu yn cau ledled y wlad y llynedd hyd yn oed. Mae ffigurau boddhad cleifion wedi llithro dros y blynyddoedd, ac mae meddygon cymunedol yn gadael y proffesiwn gyda gostyngiad o bron i 20 y cant ers 2017, gan orfodi meddygfeydd i gau. Nawr, efallai'n wir bod eich Gweinidog wedi cyhoeddi datganiad diweddar yn cydnabod nad yw disgwyliadau pobl yn cael eu bodloni, ond nid yw'n ddigon da, Prif Weinidog. Sut y byddwch chi'n rhoi sicrwydd yn y fan yma heddiw i bobl Cymru bod eich Llywodraeth yn cefnogi parhad gofal iechyd lleol ym mhob cymuned ar draws y wlad?
English: Diolch, Llywydd. First Minister, April is the month where we often experience a rise in grass fires. The vast majority of grass fires in Wales are, unfortunately, started deliberately. Can you outline what the Welsh Government is doing to educate people about the dangers of starting grass fires?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, Ebrill yw'r mis pan ein bod ni'n aml yn gweld cynnydd yn nifer y tanau glaswellt. Yn anffodus, mae mwyafrif llethol y tanau glaswellt yng Nghymru yn cael eu cynnau'n fwriadol. A allwch chi amlinellu'r hyn y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn ei wneud i addysgu pobl am beryglon cynnau tanau glaswellt?
English: I thank the Member for that question. It's timely in the sense that, as we go into the Easter period, we know that that is often a moment when grass fire numbers go up. There has been very significant success by our fire service in Wales in this aspect of what they do, as well as in many other aspects, to take preventative measures to find ways of better protecting those areas so that fires don't get started in the first place. We have employed some experimental work, using behavioural science methods to find a way of communicating with those people whom we know are most likely to be involved in setting fires in these circumstances, and to expose them to some of the risks that that poses to others and to try to influence their behaviour in that way. So, our primary method is by working closely with the fire service and using the success that they have had, but also to find other ways in which we can have access to and influence those groups that are most likely to be involved in activity of this sort.
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn yna. Mae'n amserol yn yr ystyr, wrth i ni gychwyn cyfnod y Pasg, ein bod ni'n gwybod bod honno'n aml yn adeg pan fydd nifer y tanau glaswellt yn cynyddu. Bu llwyddiant sylweddol iawn gan ein gwasanaeth tân yng Nghymru yn yr agwedd hon ar yr hyn y maen nhw'n ei wneud, yn ogystal ag mewn llawer o agweddau eraill, i gymryd mesurau ataliol i ddod o hyd i ffyrdd gwell o ddiogelu'r ardaloedd hynny fel nad oes tanau yn cael eu cynnau yn y lle cyntaf. Rydym ni wedi defnyddio rhywfaint o waith arbrofol, gan ddefnyddio dulliau gwyddor ymddygiadol i ddod o hyd i ffordd o gyfathrebu gyda'r bobl hynny yr ydym ni'n gwybod sydd yn fwyaf tebygol o gynnau tanau o dan yr amgylchiadau hyn, ac i ddangos rhai o'r risgiau y mae hynny'n eu peri i bobl eraill ac i geisio dylanwadu ar eu hymddygiad yn y ffordd honno. Felly, ein prif ddull yw gweithio'n agos gyda'r gwasanaeth tân a defnyddio'r llwyddiant y maen nhw wedi ei gael, ond hefyd i ddod o hyd i ffyrdd eraill y gallwn ni gael mynediad at y grwpiau hynny sydd fwyaf tebygol o gymryd rhan mewn gweithgarwch o'r math hwn a dylanwadu arnyn nhw.
English: I thank you for that answer. I think that that is a good approach, and I look forward to more information on that from the Government as and when you have it. Now, most of these fires, by their nature, tend to occur in rural areas or above Valleys communities. Most of the firefighters involved are, therefore, retained fire officers, meaning that they are people who have other jobs as well. Two years ago, we did have a crisis of a sort with the number of retained firefighters in Wales at an all-time low. What more can the Welsh Government do to support retained firefighters and the companies that employ them?
Welsh: Diolchaf i chi am yr ateb yna. Rwy'n credu bod hwnnw'n ddull da, ac edrychaf ymlaen at gael rhagor o wybodaeth am hynny gan y Llywodraeth pan fydd yr wybodaeth honno gennych. Nawr, mae'r rhan fwyaf o'r tanau hyn, o ran eu natur, yn tueddu i ddigwydd mewn ardaloedd gwledig neu uwchben cymunedau yn y Cymoedd. Mae mwyafrif y diffoddwyr tân dan sylw, felly, yn swyddogion tân wrth gefn, sy'n golygu eu bod nhw'n bobl sydd â swyddi eraill hefyd. Ddwy flynedd yn ôl, cawsom ni argyfwng i raddau gyda nifer y diffoddwyr tân wrth gefn yng Nghymru ar ei hisaf erioed. Beth arall all Llywodraeth Cymru ei wneud i gefnogi diffoddwyr tân wrth gefn a'r cwmnïau sy'n eu cyflogi?
English: First of all, Llywydd, can I pay tribute to the work of retained firefighters in all parts of Wales? They provide an essential service. They do so in the way that Gareth Bennett has said, often as part of other work that they do. We want to emphasise to those employers the public service that those people provide, and to try to persuade them to make their contribution as well by making it easy for people employed in those circumstances to be released in those emergencies when their services are needed, and to think of that as a contribution that they, as employers, make, and that's both public sector employers and private employers as well, to regard that as part of their corporate social responsibility, as it's usually described. More generally, as the Member will know, the fact that there are fewer fires in Wales, and that the fire service has succeeded to the extent that it has in preventing problems from arising, inevitably produces some challenges to retaining the workforce that has been there in the past when their primary task is in decline. What we have wanted to do in Wales is to find other ways in which we can deploy the talents and the skills of those people, particularly looking for ways in which they can assist other emergency services, and the health service in particular.
Welsh: Yn gyntaf oll, Llywydd, a gaf i dalu teyrnged i waith diffoddwyr tân wrth gefn ym mhob rhan o Gymru? Maen nhw'n darparu gwasanaeth hanfodol. Maen nhw'n gwneud hynny yn y ffordd y mae Gareth Bennett wedi ei ddweud, yn aml yn rhan o waith arall y maen nhw'n ei wneud. Rydym ni eisiau pwysleisio i'r cyflogwyr hynny y gwasanaeth cyhoeddus y mae'r bobl hynny yn ei ddarparu, a cheisio eu perswadio i wneud eu cyfraniad hwythau hefyd drwy ei gwneud yn rhwydd i bobl a gyflogir o dan yr amgylchiadau hynny i gael eu rhyddhau yn yr achosion brys hynny pan fo angen eu gwasanaethau, ac i ystyried hynny fel cyfraniad y maen nhw, fel cyflogwyr, yn ei wneud, ac mae hynny'n cynnwys cyflogwyr sector cyhoeddus a chyflogwyr preifat hefyd, i ystyried hynny'n rhan o'u cyfrifoldeb cymdeithasol corfforaethol, fel y'i disgrifir fel arfer. Yn fwy cyffredinol, fel y bydd yr Aelod yn gwybod, mae'r ffaith bod llai o danau yng Nghymru, a bod y gwasanaeth tân wedi llwyddo i'r graddau y mae wedi ei wneud i atal problemau rhag codi, yn arwain yn anochel at rai heriau o ran cadw'r gweithlu sydd wedi bod yno yn y gorffennol pan fo'u prif dasg yn lleihau. Yn hyn yr ydym ni wedi bod eisiau ei wneud yng Nghymru yw dod o hyd i ffyrdd eraill y gallwn ni ddefnyddio doniau a sgiliau'r bobl hynny, yn enwedig wrth chwilio am ffyrdd y gallan nhw gynorthwyo gwasanaethau brys eraill, a'r gwasanaeth iechyd yn arbennig.
English: Again, yes, there's much in that answer that I would welcome. Grass fires, obviously, are a menace. They can destroy habitats, they kill livestock and they even threaten properties and businesses. First Minister, you did mention the educational side in an earlier answer, which I welcome, as I say. Is there a need for a cross-cutting strategy, going across the various ministerial portfolios, in order to deal with this problem?
Welsh: Unwaith eto, oes, mae llawer yn yr ateb yna y byddwn yn ei groesawu. Mae tanau glaswellt, yn amlwg, yn bla. Maen nhw'n gallu dinistrio cynefinoedd, maen nhw'n lladd da byw ac maen nhw hyd yn oed yn bygwth adeiladau a busnesau. Prif Weinidog, fe wnaethoch chi sôn am yr ochr addysgol mewn ateb cynharach, yr wyf i'n ei groesawu, fel y dywedais. A oes angen strategaeth drawsbynciol, yn mynd ar draws y gwahanol bortffolios gweinidogol, er mwyn ymdrin â'r broblem hon?