English: Cabinet Secretary, I heard what you said in response to Adam Price about the situation whereby the companies are currently still open to negotiating with Tata in relation to the buy-out. In another article online, it says that alternative and more sustainable solutions are being sought by Tata. Does this not then mean that they have decided that they are not compelled by the arguments being put forward by these companies that they are able to take the Port Talbot plant, and other plants in Wales, forward? We need to understand, if they are going to go back to the table to these alternatives, if they do not find success with Thyssenkrupp on a German level. If we do not get that guarantee, then we need to have an understanding as to where Tata go in the future. They have said to me that there is intent to make sure that Port Talbot jobs are retained, but that doesn't give enough of a guarantee to me that that is their final intention. So, I would want to join with Members to make sure there is a formalised deal in place to make sure that those Welsh plants are retained and sustained for the future before any future financial backing is given by your Government to Tata. And my other question was: in this climate whereby talks are continuing in a different way, how can you assure us that companies locally around Tata Steel are not going to suffer in this complex environment? I've heard, in the last week alone, that two companies have gone into liquidation, who work with Tata Steel. I've asked Tata for more information on this, because I can't get hold of the companies in question at the moment, probably due to the fact that they have gone into liquidation. But, we can't lose more jobs in the area at the moment, when jobs around Tata are so valuable to local people. So, I would want to hear what you have to say on that, as well as making sure that any talks with this new joint venture have formalised agreement from both you and the UK Government.
Welsh: Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, clywais yr hyn a ddywedasoch wrth ymateb i Adam Price am y sefyllfa lle mae'r cwmnïau yn dal i fod yn agored i drafod â Tata ar hyn o bryd o ran prynu'r cwmni. Mewn erthygl arall ar-lein, mae'n dweud bod Tata yn chwilio am atebion gwahanol a mwy cynaliadwy. Onid yw hyn yn golygu felly eu bod wedi penderfynu nad ydynt wedi eu perswadio gan y dadleuon sy'n cael eu cynnig gan y cwmnïau hyn eu bod yn gallu symud gwaith Port Talbot, a gweithfeydd eraill yng Nghymru, yn eu blaenau? Mae angen i ni ddeall, os ydyn nhw'n mynd i fynd yn ôl at y bwrdd at y dewisiadau amgen hyn, os na chânt lwyddiant gyda Thyssenkrupp ar lefel yr Almaen. Os nad ydym yn cael y sicrwydd hwnnw, yna mae angen i ni gael dealltwriaeth ynghylch ble mae Tata yn mynd yn y dyfodol. Maen nhw wedi dweud wrthyf i bod bwriad i wneud yn siŵr bod swyddi Port Talbot yn cael eu cadw, ond nid yw hynny'n rhoi digon o sicrwydd i mi mai dyna eu bwriad terfynol. Felly, hoffwn ymuno â'r Aelodau i wneud yn siŵr bod cytundeb ffurfiol ar waith i sicrhau bod y gweithfeydd hynny yng Nghymru yn cael eu cadw a'u cynnal ar gyfer y dyfodol cyn i unrhyw gymorth ariannol gael ei roi i Tata gan eich Llywodraeth yn y dyfodol. A 'm cwestiwn arall oedd: yn yr hinsawdd hon lle mae sgyrsiau yn parhau mewn ffordd wahanol, sut gallwch chi ein sicrhau nad yw cwmnïau lleol sy'n ymwneud â Tata Steel yn mynd i ddioddef yn yr amgylchedd cymhleth hwn? Rwyf i wedi clywed, dim ond yn yr wythnos ddiwethaf, bod dau gwmni wedi sy'n gweithio gyda Tata Steel wedi eu diddymu. Rwyf wedi gofyn i Tata am fwy o wybodaeth am hyn, gan nad wyf yn gallu cael gafael ar y cwmnïau dan sylw ar hyn o bryd, yn ôl pob tebyg oherwydd y ffaith eu bod wedi eu diddymu. Ond, ni allwn golli mwy o swyddi yn yr ardal ar hyn o bryd, pan fo swyddi o gwmpas Tata mor werthfawr i bobl leol. Felly, hoffwn glywed yr hyn sydd gennych i'w ddweud am hynny, yn ogystal â gwneud yn siŵr bod unrhyw drafodaethau gyda'r fenter ar y cyd newydd hon wedi ffurfioli cytundeb oddi wrthych chi a Llywodraeth y DU.