English: Well, I would rather not, because I want to develop this argument on another point, and there will be plenty of other opportunities, I'm sure, for us to spar on this point. But, regardless of what one believes is happening in climate change, our argument is that the costs imposed by the Climate Change Act are disproportionately great for this country to bear in the context of what's happening in the rest of the world. Now, our policy on global warming was written by Mark Reckless. He wrote our manifesto, on which we all stood last May. So, I don't know whether we're going to have a Damascene conversion revealed to us this afternoon, but we'll wait and see. But the whole point is - [Interruption.] Well, the honourable Member can make his speech in due course. Because we only have four minutes, I just want to make - [Interruption.] I want to make - [Inaudible.] - simple point that this country, and I mean Wales in particular, is paying a disproportionate price for the policies that are being imposed on us. Wales actually produces not 0.5 per cent of global emissions, but 0.05 per cent of global emissions of carbon dioxide. The United Kingdom, altogether, produces about 1.16 per cent. China produces 30 per cent; the United States 15 per cent; India 7 per cent. Far from what Huw Irranca-Davies was saying about world agreements to reduce carbon emissions, China and India propose massive increases in their output of carbon dioxide over the next 30 years. China is going to double the amount of carbon dioxide that is emitted, and India is going to treble what they currently emit, because their economies are going to grow, and, under the Paris climate accord, there is a specific let-out clause for them to permit that. So, even though this is legally binding, what is legally binding permits them actually to increase their global emissions by many, many times what we would save if we closed down the entire British economy. [Interruption.] I just want to make one quotation, and then I will give way to Rhianon Passmore. Article 4.7 of the Paris accord says: 'The extent to which developing country parties will effectively implement their commitments under the Convention willtake fully into account that economic and social development and poverty eradication are the first and overriding priorities of the developing country parties' and quite rightly too. Of course, these countries, very often desperately poor, if they are to develop, are inevitably going to increase emissions of carbon dioxide. As the world population expands, that is bound to produce this effect. I give way to the Member.
Welsh: Wel, byddai'n well gennyf beidio am fy mod eisiau datblygu'r ddadl hon ar bwynt arall, a bydd digon o gyfleoedd eraill, rwy'n siŵr, i ni i ddadlau am y pwynt hwn. Ond ni waeth beth y mae neb yn ei gredu sy'n digwydd gyda newid yn yr hinsawdd, ein dadl yw bod y costau a osodwyd gan y Ddeddf Newid yn yr Hinsawdd yn anghymesur o uchel i'r wlad hon eu talu yng nghyd-destun yr hyn sy'n digwydd yng ngweddill y byd. Nawr, ysgrifennwyd ein polisi ar gynhesu byd-eang gan Mark Reckless. Ef a ysgrifennodd y maniffesto a roesom gerbron wrth inni sefyll etholiad fis Mai diwethaf. Felly, nid wyf yn gwybod a ydym yn mynd i weld tröedigaeth Ddamascaidd y prynhawn yma, ond arhoswn i weld. Ond yr holl bwynt yw - [Torri ar draws.] Wel, gall yr Aelod anrhydeddus wneud ei araith yn y man. Gan mai pedair munud yn unig sydd gennym, rwyf eisiau gwneud - [Torri ar draws.] Rwyf eisiau gwneud [Anghlywadwy.] - y pwynt syml fod y wlad hon, ac rwy'n golygu Cymru yn benodol, yn talu pris anghymesur am y polisïau sy'n cael eu gorfodi arnom. Nid 0.5 y cant o allyriadau byd-eang y mae Cymru yn eu cynhyrchu mewn gwirionedd, ond 0.05 y cant o allyriadau byd-eang o garbon deuocsid. Mae'r Deyrnas Unedig, gyda'i gilydd, yn cynhyrchu tua 1.16 y cant. Mae Tsieina'n cynhyrchu 30 y cant; yr Unol Daleithiau 15 y cant; India 7 y cant. Ymhell o'r hyn roedd Huw Irranca-Davies yn ei ddweud am gytundebau byd i leihau allyriadau carbon, mae Tsieina ac India yn argymell cynnydd enfawr yn eu hallbwn carbon deuocsid dros y 30 mlynedd nesaf. Mae Tsieina'n mynd i ddyblu faint o garbon deuocsid sy'n cael ei allyrru, ac mae India'n mynd i dreblu'r hyn y maent yn ei allyrru ar hyn o bryd oherwydd bod eu heconomïau'n mynd i dyfu, ac o dan gytundeb hinsawdd Paris, ceir cymal eithrio penodol ar eu cyfer i ganiatáu hynny. Felly, er bod hwn yn rhwymo mewn cyfraith, mae'r hyn sy'n rhwymo mewn cyfraith yn caniatáu iddynt gynyddu eu hallyriadau byd-eang lawer gwaith yn fwy na'r hyn y byddem yn ei arbed pe baem yn dileu economi Prydain gyfan. [Torri ar draws.] Rwyf am roi un dyfyniad, ac fe ildiaf i Rhianon Passmore wedyn. Mae erthygl 4.7 yng nghytundeb Paris yn dweud: Bydd y graddau y bydd gwledydd sy'n datblygu yn gweithredu eu hymrwymiadau'n effeithiol o dan y Confensiwn yn ystyried yn llawn mai datblygu economaidd a chymdeithasol a dileu tlodi yw prif flaenoriaethau'r gwledydd sy'n datblygu a hynny'n gwbl briodol hefyd. Wrth gwrs, os yw'r gwledydd hyn, sy'n aml iawn yn enbyd o dlawd, yn mynd i ddatblygu, mae'n anochel eu bod yn mynd i gynyddu allyriadau carbon deuocsid. Wrth i boblogaeth y byd ehangu, mae hynny'n rhwym o gynhyrchu'r effaith hon. Ildiaf i'r Aelod.