English: I'm very happy to support your proposal for a Bill, though I have some reservations on the detail, which I'd just like to outline. I think hydrogen vehicles are one of the solutions, but it certainly wouldn't be on top of my list of solutions, to the carbon crisis. At the moment, take-up is very low because they cost a lot of money and they aren't available. It takes at least three months to even get a new car, which are eye-wateringly expensive, and second-hand ones are almost no cheaper for the obvious reason that there's such a shortage of these vehicles. But the number of charging points that are being put in every single day is, I think, somewhere between six and 12, so the whole market is exploding. Nevertheless, I congratulate you on having a very timely proposal on the back of the Government's announcement. But some of the reservations: will the city dwellers of the future really want to clog up their streets with metal boxes that are stationary for over 90 per cent of the day? Wouldn't the space between homes be so much better used for children and adults to play as well as grow food? I remember the visit that I made in the fourth Assembly with some members of the environment committee to Freiburg in Baden-Württemberg as part of the environment committee, and the quality and connectivity of the public transport and active travel routes meant that far fewer residents in that city bothered to have a car, and were renting one as and when they needed to go on holiday or make a special or unusual journey. One housing estate we visited had a wonderful willow adventure playground whose footprint overtly represented the footprint of land set aside for an additional car park. And the question for residents was: did they prefer this wooded playground or another multi-storey car park? And it's worth noting that the design of that estate allowed people to drive up to their front door to offload people or groceries, but cars could only be parked in the existing multi-storey car park, and that made for just a much more pleasant environment. So, I think we have an awful long way to go in our thinking through of twenty-first century appropriate designs. Secondly, whilst electric vehicles belch out a lot less pollution than diesel or petrol cars, I grant you they are not without cost to the environment. It all depends, for example, on whether the energy they're going to be using to charge that electric vehicle is clean energy from renewables - not much of that happening anywhere in Britain that I'm aware of - or dirty energy from fossil fuels. There's a huge difference in terms of the outcome for the environment and for carbon emissions. So, if this proposal gets the go-ahead, I'd want to see the proposal amended to insist that the electric charging points put in with new housing -
Welsh: Rwy'n falch iawn o gefnogi eich cynnig am Fil, er bod gennyf rai amheuon ynghylch y manylion yr hoffwn eu hamlinellu. Credaf fod cerbydau hydrogen yn un o'r atebion, ond yn sicr, ni fyddent ar frig fy rhestr o atebion i'r argyfwng carbon. Ar hyn o bryd, mae'r nifer sy'n eu defnyddio yn isel iawn am eu bod yn costio llawer o arian ac nid ydynt ar gael. Mae'n cymryd tri mis o leiaf i gael car newydd, sy'n ddrud eithriadol, ac nid yw rhai ail-law fawr rhatach am y rheswm amlwg fod y cerbydau hyn mor brin. Ond credaf fod nifer y pwyntiau gwefru sy'n cael eu gosod bob dydd rywle rhwng chwech a 12, felly mae'r farchnad gyfan yn ffrwydro. Serch hynny, rwy'n eich llongyfarch ar gael cynnig amserol iawn yn dilyn cyhoeddiad y Llywodraeth. Ond rhai o'r amheuon: a fydd trigolion dinasoedd y dyfodol am lenwi eu strydoedd â blychau metel sy'n llonydd am dros 90 y cant o'r dydd? Oni fyddai'n well defnyddio'r gofod rhwng cartrefi i blant ac oedolion chwarae yn ogystal â thyfu bwyd? Cofiaf fy ymweliad yn y pedwerydd Cynulliad, gyda rhai aelodau o bwyllgor yr amgylchedd, â Freiburg yn Baden-Württemberg fel rhan o bwyllgor yr amgylchedd, ac roedd ansawdd a chysylltedd y llwybrau trafnidiaeth gyhoeddus a theithio llesol yn golygu bod llawer llai o drigolion yn y ddinas honno'n trafferthu cael car, ac roeddent yn rhentu un pan oedd angen iddynt fynd ar wyliau neu wneud taith arbennig neu anghyffredin. Roedd gan un ystâd dai y buom yn ymweld â hi faes chwarae antur coed helyg bendigedig, ac roedd ei ôl troed yn amlwg yn cynrychioli ôl troed tir a neilltuwyd ar gyfer maes parcio ychwanegol. A'r cwestiwn i'r trigolion oedd: a oedd yn well ganddynt y maes chwarae coediog hwn neu faes parcio aml-lawr arall? Ac mae'n werth nodi bod cynllun yr ystâd honno'n caniatáu i bobl yrru at ddrws y tŷ i ddadlwytho pobl neu nwyddau, ond yn y maes parcio aml-lawr yn unig y gellid parcio ceir, ac roedd hynny'n creu amgylchedd mwy dymunol o lawer. Felly, credaf fod cryn dipyn o ffordd gennym i fynd o ran meddwl am ddyluniadau sy'n briodol ar gyfer yr unfed ganrif ar hugain. Yn ail, er bod cerbydau trydan yn allyrru llawer llai o lygredd na cheir diesel neu betrol, rwy'n cydnabod nad ydynt heb gost i'r amgylchedd. Mae'r cyfan yn dibynnu, er enghraifft, ar p'un a yw'r ynni y byddant yn ei ddefnyddio i wefru'r cerbyd trydan hwnnw'n ynni glân o ffynonellau adnewyddadwy - nid wyf yn ymwybodol fod fawr o hynny'n digwydd yn unrhyw le ym Mhrydain - neu'n ynni budr o danwydd ffosil. Mae gwahaniaeth enfawr o ran y canlyniad i'r amgylchedd ac o ran allyriadau carbon. Felly, os derbynnir y cynnig hwn, buaswn yn awyddus i weld y cynnig yn cael ei ddiwygio i sicrhau bod y pwyntiau gwefru trydan sy'n cael eu gosod gyda thai newydd -