English: Thank you, Llywydd. I was trying to find out where the unmute button was on the screen there. Can I say, before I start to address the first supplementary budget, I would like to make two very brief points, but I think they really are important? Firstly, I believe setting an initial budget and a supplementary budget are the most important things that the Senedd collectively does. Without these decisions, the Government would not have a penny to spend. Yet the time allocated for the supplementary budget is the same as an opposition debate, and the speaking time will be the same. As we see the Senedd as a maturing Parliament, surely the budget process is worthy of an afternoon's debate and 10 minutes' minimum time for speeches. The second quick point is: the consequential funding is provided from an increase in expenditure in England in areas devolved to Wales. While the Plenary session may not be the correct place to report on this in detail, I believe that a report on all consequential increases in funding, including the calculations on which they are based, should be provided in writing to the Finance Committee. I believe - and I've written this before - that, too often, the Treasury treat us as just another spending department at Westminster, rather than as a devolved Government, which leads me on to the first three recommendations of the Finance Committee, which recommend that 'the Welsh Government continues to monitor and explore whether consequentials received through the Barnett formula are reflective of the needs of Wales'. 'Should consequentials not adequately reflect the needs of Wales in light of COVID-19 the Committee recommends that the Welsh Government confirm with UK Government alternative funding options as a matter of urgency.' And I know Llyr Grufydd went into some detail on that earlier, so I'm not going to repeat it. And the committee recommends that: 'the Welsh Government insists that the UK Government provides as much informationas possible, on any UK Government announcement that affects Wales, its residents and/or the businesses that operate here.' I'm not going to continue a debate that I've had with the Minister, over some time, over whether we've got sufficient money from the finance changes that were made in paying off the debts of the health boards in England and the Government in Westminster taking some financial interest in the companies concerned, when they were actually all public companies to start with. I'm not going to debate that today; I just want to put that on the record. Can I turn now to the main part of the first supplementary budget? As the Minister said, this is very different to the minor changes of previous years, which we're used to. Normally, supplementary budgets are technical events, regularised allocations, move some money around, give additional money to people who've succeeded with their special pleading, but it's just small sums moving around. This is much different to that. It's almost 15 per cent of the total budget - 14 per cent of the total budget, something like that. It's a big change. And the pandemic has - . Unprecedented levels of Government investment have followed. Lots of money has been spent. And, like John Griffiths, I'm concerned that - will local government be fully recompensed for the money it has spent in order to get us out of this mess? And can I just say, again for the record, I think local government has been superb? Ignoring political control of the different councils, the councils have really stepped up to the mark. And there's a couple of national organisations that, if they'd done equally as well, we'd be in a much better position. On the detail of the budget, I have serious concerns about the reductions to both the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales and NRW, as both cover areas that face significant challenges in the short and medium term. While the work streams that would have been covered have disappeared, therefore they don't need the money for that, HEFCW needs the money, because higher education is really important to the economy. We talk about the foundational economy; the foundation of the economy in a number of places - Aberystwyth, Lampeter, Swansea, amongst others - is the university. You take the university out and you've taken out the foundation of that economy. And with NRW - . I think NRW was a mistake - putting it all together - but it does have financial problems, and we need to ensure that it is ideally funded. We, as a Finance Committee, felt it wasn't funded as well as it could have been initially. We, as climate change committee, didn't think it was being funded as well as it could be, and now they've taken more money off it. And I have serious concerns about that. On the money given out, I'll just say again, for the record, giving out rate relief to shops that have been open - some of which have been selling food and drink and been having Christmas every week - I think was a fundamental mistake. And I know the Minister has said it would be more complicated. I think a simple questionnaire: 'Do you sell food and drink? Are you open?' - if the answer is 'yes' to both of those, then they shouldn't have got rate relief, because I think that has given money to people who didn't need it, and all it's done is feed their bottom line. It's not easy to predict what's going to happen in the future. I think more work is going to carry on from home - how much, I don't know. And I think that - . How many people will carry on with online shopping - people have got used to it now - and what effect would that have on city centres? I think we need to perhaps spend some time thinking about the future, but realising we won't know until things happen. Just finally, global warming has not gone away, so we need more sustainable ways of working. And finally, if I can say, I would really appreciate it if Plaid Cymru and the Conservatives would bring alternative budgets, and bring alternative supplementary budgets, saying what they'd spend more on and what they'd spend less on, then we can have a debate, rather than saying, 'Well, we'll abstain or we'll vote against it, but we're not quite sure what we don't like.' Please, produce your own budgets or your own changes. I often do, and I haven't got the benefit of a whole party behind me. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Roeddwn i'n ceisio darganfod ble roedd y botwm i agor y meic ar y sgrin. A gaf fi ddweud, cyn i mi ddechrau rhoi sylw i'r gyllideb atodol gyntaf, hoffwn wneud dau bwynt byr iawn, ond rwy'n credu eu bod yn bwysig iawn? Yn gyntaf, credaf mai pennu cyllideb gychwynnol a chyllideb atodol yw'r pethau pwysicaf y mae'r Senedd yn eu gwneud gyda'i gilydd. Heb y penderfyniadau hyn, ni fyddai gan y Llywodraeth yr un geiniog i'w gwario. Ac eto, mae'r amser a neilltuir ar gyfer y gyllideb atodol yr un faint ag a roddir i ddadleuon y gwrthbleidiau, a bydd yr amser siarad yr un fath. Wrth inni weld y Senedd yn aeddfedu, does bosibl nad yw proses y gyllideb yn deilwng o ddadl brynhawn ac o leiaf 10 munud ar gyfer areithiau. Yr ail bwynt cyflym yw hwn: darperir y cyllid canlyniadol o gynnydd mewn gwariant yn Lloegr mewn meysydd sydd wedi'u datganoli i Gymru. Er nad y Cyfarfod Llawn yw'r lle cywir i adrodd ar hyn yn fanwl, credaf y dylai adroddiad ar bob cynnydd canlyniadol mewn cyllid, gan gynnwys y cyfrifiadau y maent yn seiliedig arnynt, gael ei ddarparu'n ysgrifenedig i'r Pwyllgor Cyllid. Rwy'n credu - ac rwyf wedi ysgrifennu hyn o'r blaen - fod y Trysorlys, yn rhy aml, yn ein trin fel adran wario arall yn San Steffan, yn hytrach nag fel Llywodraeth ddatganoledig, sy'n fy arwain at dri argymhelliad cyntaf y Pwyllgor Cyllid, sy'n argymell 'bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn parhau i fonitro ac archwilio a yw cyllid canlyniadol a geir drwy fformiwla Barnett yn adlewyrchu anghenion Cymru'. 'Os na fydd cyllid canlyniadol yn adlewyrchu anghenion Cymru yn ddigonol yn sgil COVID-19, mae'r Pwyllgor yn argymell bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn cadarnhau gyda Llywodraeth y DU opsiynau ariannu eraill ar frys.' Ac rwy'n gwybod bod Llyr Grufydd wedi manylu ar hynny'n gynharach, felly nid wyf am ei ailadrodd. Ac mae'r pwyllgor yn argymell: 'bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn mynnu bod Llywodraeth y DU yn rhoi cymaint o wybodaeth â phosibl, am unrhyw gyhoeddiad gan Lywodraeth y DU sy'n effeithio ar Gymru, ei thrigolion a/neu'r busnesau sy'n gweithredu yma.' Nid wyf yn mynd i barhau dadl rwyf wedi'i chael gyda'r Gweinidog dros gryn dipyn o amser, ynglŷn ag a ydym yn cael digon o arian o'r newidiadau cyllid a wnaethpwyd wrth dalu dyledion byrddau iechyd yn Lloegr a'r Llywodraeth yn San Steffan yn dangos rhywfaint o ddiddordeb ariannol yn y cwmnïau cysylltiedig, pan oeddent yn gwmnïau cyhoeddus i ddechrau mewn gwirionedd. Nid wyf yn mynd i drafod hynny heddiw, dim ond ei gofnodi. A gaf fi droi yn awr at brif ran y gyllideb atodol gyntaf? Fel y dywedodd y Gweinidog, mae hyn yn wahanol iawn i'r mân newidiadau a fu yn y blynyddoedd blaenorol, newidiadau rydym wedi arfer â hwy. Fel arfer, mae cyllidebau atodol yn ddigwyddiadau technegol, dyraniadau wedi'u rheoleiddio, maent yn symud rhywfaint o arian o gwmpas, yn rhoi arian ychwanegol i bobl sydd wedi llwyddo i ymbil mewn ffordd arbennig, ond dim ond symiau bach sy'n symud o gwmpas. Mae hyn yn wahanol iawn i hynny. Mae bron yn 15 y cant o'r gyllideb gyfan - 14 y cant o'r gyllideb gyfan, rhywbeth fel hynny. Mae'n newid mawr. Ac mae'r pandemig wedi - . Ceir lefelau digyffelyb o fuddsoddiad gan y Llywodraeth yn ei sgil. Mae llawer o arian wedi'i wario. Ac fel John Griffiths, rwy'n pryderu - a fydd llywodraeth leol yn cael ad-daliad llawn o'r arian y mae wedi'i wario er mwyn ein cael ni allan o'r llanast hwn? Ac a gaf fi ddweud, unwaith eto, er mwyn iddo gael ei gofnodi, rwy'n credu bod llywodraeth leol wedi bod yn wych? Gan anwybyddu rheolaeth wleidyddol y gwahanol gynghorau, mae'r cynghorau wedi ysgwyddo eu cyfrifoldeb. A byddem mewn sefyllfa lawer gwell pe bai un neu ddau o sefydliadau cenedlaethol wedi gwneud yr un fath. Ar fanylion y gyllideb, mae gennyf bryderon difrifol am y gostyngiadau i Gyngor Cyllido Addysg Uwch Cymru ac i CNC, gan fod y ddau'n ymwneud â meysydd sy'n wynebu heriau sylweddol yn y tymor byr a chanolig. Er bod y ffrydiau gwaith a fyddai wedi'u cynnwys wedi diflannu, felly nid oes angen arian arnynt ar gyfer hynny, mae angen yr arian ar CCAUC, oherwydd mae addysg uwch yn bwysig iawn i'r economi. Soniwn am yr economi sylfaenol; sylfaen yr economi mewn nifer o leoedd - Aberystwyth, Llanbedr Pont Steffan, Abertawe, ymysg eraill - yw'r brifysgol. Heb y brifysgol, byddwch yn colli sylfaen yr economi honno. A chyda Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru - . Rwy'n credu mai camgymeriad oedd CNC - rhoi'r cyfan at ei gilydd - ond mae ganddo broblemau ariannol, ac mae angen inni sicrhau ei fod yn cael ei ariannu'n ddelfrydol. Roeddem ni, fel Pwyllgor Cyllid, o'r farn nad oedd wedi'i ariannu cystal ag y gallai fod wedi cael ei ariannu yn y lle cyntaf. Nid oeddem ni, fel pwyllgor newid hinsawdd yn credu ei fod yn cael ei ariannu cystal ag y gellid bod wedi'i wneud, ac maent bellach wedi mynd â mwy o arian oddi wrtho. Ac mae gennyf bryderon difrifol ynglŷn â hynny. O ran yr arian a ddyrannwyd, dywedaf eto ar gyfer y cofnod fy mod yn credu bod rhoi rhyddhad ardrethi i siopau sydd wedi bod ar agor - mae rhai ohonynt wedi bod yn gwerthu bwyd a diod ac wedi bod yn cael Nadolig bob wythnos - yn gamgymeriad sylfaenol yn fy marn i. Ac rwy'n gwybod bod y Gweinidog wedi dweud y byddai'n fwy cymhleth. Rwy'n meddwl y byddai holiadur syml: 'A ydych chi'n gwerthu bwyd a diod? A ydych chi'n agored?' - os mai'r ateb i'r ddau gwestiwn yw 'ydym', ni ddylent fod wedi cael rhyddhad ardrethi, oherwydd credaf fod hynny wedi rhoi arian i bobl nad oedd ei angen arnynt, a'r cyfan y mae wedi'i wneud yw bwydo eu helw net. Nid yw'n hawdd rhagweld beth sy'n mynd i ddigwydd yn y dyfodol. Rwy'n credu bod mwy o weithio gartref yn mynd i barhau - faint, nid wyf yn gwybod. Ac rwy'n credu - . Faint o bobl fydd yn parhau i siopa ar-lein - mae pobl wedi arfer â hynny nawr - a pha effaith a gâi hynny ar ganol dinasoedd? Rwy'n meddwl efallai fod angen i ni dreulio ychydig o amser yn meddwl am y dyfodol, ond gan sylweddoli na fyddwn yn gwybod hyd nes y bydd pethau'n digwydd. Yn olaf, nid yw cynhesu byd-eang wedi diflannu, felly mae angen ffyrdd mwy cynaliadwy o weithio. Ac yn olaf, os caf ddweud, byddwn yn gwerthfawrogi'n fawr pe bai Plaid Cymru a'r Ceidwadwyr yn cyflwyno cyllidebau amgen, ac yn cyflwyno cyllidebau atodol amgen, yn dweud ar beth y byddent yn gwario mwy ac ar beth y byddent yn gwario llai, yna gallwn gael dadl, yn hytrach na dweud, 'Wel, fe fyddwn yn ymatal ein pleidlais neu byddwn yn pleidleisio yn ei erbyn, ond nid ydym yn hollol siŵr beth nad ydym yn ei hoffi.' Cynhyrchwch eich cyllidebau eich hunain os gwelwch yn dda, neu eich newidiadau eich hunain. Rwy'n aml yn gwneud hynny, ac nid oes gennyf y fantais o gael plaid gyfan y tu ôl i mi. Diolch.