techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: On the power to demand costs from private health services providers, there is quite a detailed regime set out here, but is it fair? Are you content that it's a fair regime for the providers in the private health sector?
Welsh: Ar y pŵer i fynnu costau oddi wrth ddarparwyr gwasanaethau iechyd preifat, mae yna gyfundrefn eithaf manwl yn cael ei gosod yn fan hyn, ond a ydy hi'n deg? A ydych yn hapus ei bod yn gyfundrefn deg ar gyfer y darparwyr yn y sector breifat?
English: Yes, we are content that the powers - . It's quite a high test in the Bill because there must be evidence that the private authority has obstructed the ombudsman throughout the investigation process.
Welsh: Rŷm ni yn hapus bod y pwerau - . Mae'r prawf yn un uchel yn y Bil, achos mae'n rhaid bod tystiolaeth bod yr awdurdod preifat wedi 'obstruct-o' yr ombwdsman trwy broses yr ymchwiliad.
English: And there is also a power for the private services to appeal. So, that makes the process fair.
Welsh: Ac mae yna bŵer i'r gwasanaethau preifat apelio ynddo fo hefyd. Mae hwnnw'n gwneud y broses yn deg.
English: Talking about Part 7, Miscellaneous and General, there is talk about creating a strategy for the Welsh language. I was surprised, really, that you didn't have a strategy but you have a language plan under the old regime. But who will be monitoring all of this, and what principles will be implemented in the strategy?
Welsh: A sôn am Ran 7, Amrywiol a Chyffredinol, mae yna sôn am greu strategaeth ar gyfer y Gymraeg. Roeddwn i'n synnu, a dweud y gwir, nad oes gennych chi strategaeth ond mae gennych chi gynllun iaith o dan yr hen drefn. Ond pwy fydd yn monitro hyn i gyd, a beth fydd yr egwyddorion a fydd ar waith yn y strategaeth?
English: I would just like to ask another question, which doesn't relate directly to the Bill, but it does relate to the Welsh language. You have shown a desire to deal with complaints regarding the lack of implementation of the standards - the rights of Welsh speakers - and you have expressed that you want to do that in order to reduce bureaucracy, but isn't this going to - ? You have all these new powers, isn't that something that is going to be additional that should remain with the Welsh Language Commissioner?
Welsh: Buaswn i'n hoffi jest gofyn un cwestiwn sydd ddim yn uniongyrchol yn ymwneud efo'r Bil, ond mae'n ymwneud efo'r Gymraeg. Rydych chi wedi dangos awydd i ddelio efo cwynion ynghylch diffyg gweithredu'r safonau - hawliau siaradwyr Cymraeg - ac wedi mynegi eich bod chi eisiau gwneud hynny er mwyn lleihau biwrocratiaeth, ond, onid ydy hwn yn mynd i - ? Rydych chi'n cael yr holl bwerau newydd yma, onid yw hwnnw'n rhywbeth ychwanegol a ddylai aros efo Comisiynydd y Gymraeg?
English: I have talked about how the current regime works, because I do think that it is overly bureaucratic. It's overly bureaucratic in the most unfair way for the commissioner, because she doesn't currently have the power of early resolution. That means - . We are coming up to Christmas, and last year, I think I'm right to say, someone made a complaint in Wrexham because the Christmas tree said 'Merry Christmas' above ' Nadolig Llawen '. The commissioner decided not to investigate that complaint and then she was sent to the tribunal. To show the difference, in Ireland, the ombudsman receives 400 complaints a year. The ombudsman conducts five full investigations, because for about 200 or 300 of the cases, they use early resolution. So, that's what's important; not who deals with the complaints, but the fact that they are dealt with earlier, to be fair to the complainant and the commissioner.
Welsh: Rydw i wedi sôn am y ffordd y mae'r gyfundrefn bresennol yn gweithio, oherwydd rydw i'n meddwl ei fod o'n or-fiwrocrataidd. Mae'n or-fiwrocrataidd yn y ffordd fwyaf annheg i'r comisiynydd, oherwydd nid oes ganddi'r pŵer ar hyn o bryd i ddatrys yn gynnar. Mae hynny'n golygu - . Rydw i'n gwybod ein bod yn dod at y Nadolig, a'r llynedd, rydw i'n meddwl fy mod i'n iawn i ddweud, roedd rhywun wedi cwyno yn Wrecsam oherwydd roedd y goeden Nadolig yn dweud, ' Merry Christmas' uwchben 'Nadolig Llawen'. Fe ddaru'r comisiynydd benderfynu peidio ag ymchwilio i'r gŵyn yna, wedyn cafodd hi ei gyrru i'r tribiwnlys. Yn Iwerddon, i ddangos y gwahaniaeth, mae'r ombwdsmon yn Iwerddon yn cael 400 o gwynion bob blwyddyn. Pum ymchwiliad llawn mae'n ei wneud, oherwydd mae yna tua 200 neu 300 o achosion lle maen nhw'n defnyddio datrysiad cynnar. Felly, dyna beth sy'n bwysig; nid pwy sy'n delio â'r cwynion, ond y ffaith eu bod nhw'n cael eu delio gyda'n gynharach, i fod yn deg i'r achwynydd a hefyd i'r comisiynydd.
English: But, if the process changed, the commissioner would be able to deal with complaints sooner. Moving the process and the complaints over to you isn't necessarily the answer to the problem. If the problem is that there's too much bureaucracy within the system at the moment, then change the bureaucracy - reduce that bureaucracy and leave the complaints where they are, because they fit into the broader brief that the commissioner has.
Welsh: Ond, petai'r broses yn newid, mi fyddai'r comisiynydd yn gallu delio efo'r cwynion yn gynt. Nid yw symud y broses a'r cwynion draw i chi, o angenrheidrwydd, yn ateb i'r broblem. Os mai'r broblem ydy bod gormod o fiwrocratiaeth o fewn y system ar hyn o bryd, wel, newid y fiwrocratiaeth - tynnu'r fiwrocratiaeth yna i lawr, a gadael y cwynion lle maen nhw, achos maen nhw'n ffitio i mewn i'r briff mwy eang sydd gan y comisiynydd.
English: I do not disagree with that, because, if we did see a new regime with early resolution, I would be very pleased. I don't know how the commissioner feels about that. But there are two principles where I think there is public interest. The first is early resolution, and clearly I have those powers; the commissioner doesn't have those at the moment, but if that were to happen, I would welcome that. The second point is independence. I don't, for one second, say that the commissioner isn't trying to be independent, but constitutionally we all know that each commissioner - not just the language commissioner - is appointed by a Minister. So, when it comes to dealing with complaints against the Government, I think that it is an important principle that someone is accountable to the Assembly. Because, in terms of the confidence of the complainant, they have to know that, if they complain about any department of the Government, the person responsible for investigating has not been appointed by the Minister who is, perhaps, being criticised. So, that's the situation in terms of the constitution.
Welsh: Nid wyf i'n anghytuno efo hynny, oherwydd, petasem ni'n gweld cyfundrefn newydd gyda datrysiad cynnar, buaswn i'n falch iawn. Nid wyf yn gwybod sut mae'r comisiynydd yn teimlo am hynny. Ond rydw i'n meddwl bod yna ddwy egwyddor lle rwy'n meddwl bod yna ddiddordeb cyhoeddus. Yr un cyntaf yw datrysiad cynnar, ac yn amlwg mae gennyf i'r pwerau hynny; nid ydynt gan y comisiynydd ar hyn o bryd, ond petai hynny'n digwydd, buaswn i'n croesawu hynny. Yr ail bwynt yw annibyniaeth. Nid wyf i am eiliad yn dweud bod y comisiynydd ddim yn trio bod yn annibynnol, ond yn gyfansoddiadol rydym ni i gyd yn gwybod bod pob comisiynydd - nid jest y comisiynydd iaith - yn cael eu hapwyntio gan Weinidog. Rŵan, pan mae'n dod i ddelio efo cwynion yn erbyn y Llywodraeth, rydw i'n meddwl ei fod yn egwyddor bwysig bod yn rhaid i rywun fod yn atebol i'r Cynulliad. Oherwydd, o safbwynt hyder yr achwynydd, mae'n rhaid iddyn nhw wybod, os ydyn nhw'n cwyno am unrhyw adran o'r Llywodraeth, nad yw'r person sy'n gyfrifol am ymchwilio wedi cael ei benodi gan y Gweinidog yna sydd, efallai, yn cael ei feirniadu. Dyna'r sefyllfa o safbwynt y cyfansoddiad.
English: I could ask more questions regarding independence, but I won't.
Welsh: Buaswn i'n gallu gofyn mwy o gwestiynau ynglŷn ag annibyniaeth, ond, ni wnaf.
English: I'll move on to costs -
Welsh: Fe wnaf symud ymlaen at gostau -
English: Yes. The cost of all of this; the cost of taking on more powers. There is talk of £7 million of additional costs. Could you just explain how the - ? There is talk of trying to make some savings within the system as it is at the moment in terms of the cases, but having considered that, it's still going to cost an additional £7 million plus money to promote a whole new system. So, we are talking about quite a bit more money in times of austerity. 'Can we justify this?' is the question for us as politicians.
Welsh: Ie. Cost hyn i gyd; cost cymryd mwy o bwerau ymlaen. Mae yna sôn am £7 miliwn o gostau ychwanegol. A wnewch chi jest egluro sut mae'r - ? Achos mae yna sôn am drio gwneud rhywfaint o arbedion o fewn y system fel y mae hi ar hyn o bryd o ran yr achosion, ond wedi cymryd hynny i mewn i ystyriaeth, mae o dal yn mynd i gostio £7 miliwn yn ychwanegol plus arian hyrwyddo'r holl gyfundrefn newydd. So, rydym ni yn sôn am eithaf tipyn o arian mewn cyfnod o lymder. 'A ydym ni'n gallu cyfiawnhau hyn?' ydy'r cwestiwn i ni fel gwleidyddion.
English: It's going to mean additional costs as well to some of the public bodies, up to £300,000 over the period. Again, in a time of austerity, local authorities and so forth aren't going to be very happy in facing more costs.
Welsh: Mae o'n mynd i olygu costau ychwanegol hefyd i rai o'r cyrff cyhoeddus, hyd at £300,000 dros y cyfnod. Eto, mewn cyfnod o lymder, nid ydy'r awdurdodau lleol ac yn y blaen yn mynd i fod yn hapus iawn yn wynebu mwy o gostau.
English: No, but as I say, there are savings in that regime as well, and I would hope, as I said about the health service, if people are open and co-operating and approaching this in a positive way, then there are significant savings, and also, of course -
Welsh: Na, ond fel rydw i'n dweud, mae yna arbedion yn y gyfundrefn yna hefyd, a buaswn i'n gobeithio, fel y dywedais i am y gwasanaeth iechyd, os yw pobl yn agored ac yn cydweithio ac yn dod tuag at hyn mewn ffordd bositif, rydw i'n meddwl bod yna arbedion sylweddol, a hefyd, wrth gwrs -
English: But it's difficult to prove that, isn't it? It's difficult to prove that your work is going to have a direct impact on reducing the public purse budget in general. That's the problem. If there was a way of showing exactly, directly - . Are there examples where you can show savings that can happen as a result of your work?
Welsh: Ond mae hi'n anodd profi hynny, onid ydy? Mae'n anodd profi bod eich gwaith chi yn mynd i gael effaith uniongyrchol ar leihau cyllideb y pwrs cyhoeddus yn gyffredinol. Dyna ydy'r broblem. Petai yna ffordd o ddangos yn uniongyrchol - . A oes yna enghreifftiau o le mae yna - ? A fedrwch chi ddangos enghreifftiau lle mae yna arbediad yn gallu digwydd oherwydd eich gwaith chi?
English: Yes, there are, and I think that that's why it's worth considering the memorandum in great detail, because the costs in that show that there's a good business case for adopting these powers.
Welsh: Oes, mae yna, ac rydw i'n meddwl dyna pam mae'n werth ystyried y memorandwm yn fanwl iawn, oherwydd mae'r costau y tu fewn i hwnnw yn dangos bod yna achos busnes da iawn dros fabwysiadu'r pwerau yma.
English: He also mentioned the role of the community health councils and their work as advocates and referred to that as an answer.
Welsh: Mi wnaeth o sôn hefyd ynglŷn â rôl y cynghorau iechyd cymuned a'u gwaith nhw fel eiriolwyr a chyfeirio at hynny fel ateb.
English: I see it as being very important, having worked with them for many years until now. If we were to lose them, it wouldn't be very good for patients at all in my opinion.
Welsh: Rwy'n ei weld o'n bwysig ofnadwy, wedi gweithio efo nhw ers blynyddoedd hyd rŵan. Pe buasem ni'n colli'r rheini, ni fuasai fo'n dda iawn i'r patients o gwbl yn fy marn i.
English: The advocacy work, yes.
Welsh: Y gwaith eirioli, ie.
English: Can I ask a question that I asked the ombudsman as well? Aren't we in danger of creating a complaints culture here and creating more and more opportunities, in a way, for people to present their complaints, in particular orally? Are we going to open the floodgates for all sorts of work and, ultimately, all of it won't be sustainable?
Welsh: A allaf ofyn cwestiwn y gwnes i ei ofyn i'r ombwdsman hefyd? Onid ydym ni mewn perig o greu rhyw ddiwylliant o gwyno wrth greu mwy a mwy o gyfleon, mewn ffordd, i bobl roi eu cwyn ymlaen, yn enwedig ar lafar? A ydym ni'n mynd i agor y llifddorau i bob math o waith ac, yn y pen draw, bydd yr holl beth ddim yn gynaliadwy?
English: Therefore, it's a wider problem than just the complaints that come through. In a way, it's a broader problem about how we monitor and regulate the private sector.
Welsh: Felly, mae o'n broblem ehangach na dim ond y cwynion sydd yn dod drwodd. Mewn ffordd, mae o'n broblem ehangach ynglŷn â sut rydym ni'n monitro ac yn rheoleiddio'r sector breifat.
English: Well, it's difficult to know because patients go there and we don't know at all times what's happened to them. If the complaint is about part of the hospital and then they go to a private hospital, we often don't know what's happened to them there.
Welsh: Wel, mae hi'n anodd gwybod, achos mae'r cleifion yn mynd yna ac nid ydym ni'n cael gwybod bob amser beth sydd wedi digwydd iddyn nhw. Os ydy'r cwyn am damaid o'r ysbyty, ac wedyn maen nhw'n mynd i ysbyty breifat, nid ydym ni, yn aml, yn gwybod beth sydd wedi digwydd iddyn nhw yn y fanna.
English: But this would help that.
Welsh: Ond mi fyddai hwn yn helpu hynny.
English: Except that they couldn't investigate as thoroughly the private element of the journey. There are still questions about that. This would help, perhaps, but there would still be questions about how deep a right the ombudsman would have to investigate in the private sector, and what you're saying is that perhaps there is a need - that it's a problem that's more than dealing with complaints in the private sector; it's the way the sector is regulated in general.
Welsh: Heblaw nad ydyn nhw'n gallu mynd i mewn mor ddwfn i'r agwedd breifat yn y daith, mewn ffordd. Ac mae yna dal gwestiynau ynglŷn â hynny. Buasai hwn yn helpu, efallai, ond byddai yna dal gwestiynau ynglŷn â pha mor ddwfn y buasai gan yr ombwdsman hawl i fynd i ymchwilio yn y sector breifat, a beth rydych chi'n ei ddweud yw efallai bod angen edrych - mae o'n broblem mwy na dim ond delio â chwynion ynglŷn â'r sector breifat; mae o'n ymwneud â'r ffordd mae'r sector yn cael ei rheoleiddio'n gyffredinol.
English: Thank you very much. Obviously, extending the powers will cost money and one assessment mentions about £7 million extra funding. Have you had a chance to see the business case? And what do you think of the way that that financial business case has been presented?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr. Yn amlwg, mae ymestyn y pwerau yn mynd i gostio ac mae yna un asesiad yn sôn am tua £7 miliwn yn ychwanegol o arian. A ydych chi wedi cael cyfle i weld yr achos busnes? A beth ydych yn meddwl o'r ffordd mae'r achos busnes ariannol yn cael ei gyflwyno?
English: I haven't studied the financial side of it.
Welsh: Nid wyf i wedi astudio'r ochr ariannol.
English: Good morning and welcome to the Finance Committee meeting this morning. We have apologies from Steffan Lewis. Just to remind everyone, please, to put your electronic devices on silent. Simultaneous translation is on channel 1 and amplification is on channel 0. Any declarations of interest from Members for this Bill, more than normal, therefore? No.
Welsh: Bore da a chroeso i gyfarfod y Pwyllgor Cyllid y bore yma. Mae ymddiheuriadau wedi'u derbyn gan Steffan Lewis. Rwy'n jest atgoffa pawb i dawelu unrhyw ddyfeisiadau electronig hefyd. Mae cyfieithu ar y pryd, wrth gwrs - cyfieithu ar sianel 1 a'r sain gwreiddiol ar sianel 0. A oes gan unrhyw Aelod fuddiannau i'w datgan o ran y Bil hwn, yn fwy na'r arferol, felly? Nac oes.
English: We will move on, then, just to note the papers before the committee. We have two papers and a set of minutes from the last two meetings. Can I just draw the committee's attention to one of the papers, which is the Auditor General for Wales's fee scheme? We looked at this as part of the papers when we were looking at the auditor general's estimates, but we also have to note and endorse the fee scheme formally. That is what we are doing today. Is everyone content? Thank you very much. I see that everyone is content to do so.
Welsh: Felly, fe wnawn ni symud ymlaen jest i nodi y papurau sydd gerbron y pwyllgor. Mae yna ddau bapur a hefyd set o gofnodion y ddau gyfarfod diwethaf. A gaf i jest dynnu sylw'r pwyllgor at un o'r papurau, sef cynllun ffioedd Archwilydd Cyffredinol Cymru? Fe wnaethom ni edrych ar hwn fel rhan o'r papurau pan oeddem ni'n edrych ar amcangyfrifon yr archwilydd cyffredinol, ond mae'n rhaid i ni hefyd nodi a chymeradwyo y cynllun ffioedd yn ffurfiol. Dyna beth yr ŷm ni'n ei wneud heddiw. Felly, gyda hynny, a ydy pawb yn barod? Ocê, diolch yn fawr. Rwy'n gweld bod pawb yn fodlon gwneud hynny.
English: We'll turn, therefore, to the Cabinet Secretary, Vaughan Gething, and the Bill we are looking at today. May I ask the officials to introduce themselves, for the record, please?
Welsh: Fe wnawn ni droi, felly, at yr Ysgrifennydd Cabinet, Vaughan Gething, a'r Bil sydd ger ein bron heddiw. A gaf i jest ofyn i'r swyddogion ddatgan eu henwau a'u swyddogaethau, jest ar gyfer y cofnod hefyd, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: Okay, thank you very much. Welcome to you all. We'll begin straight away, if you're happy for us to go straight into questions, on the Public Health (Minimum Price for Alcohol) (Wales) Bill. If I may begin - a question to the Cabinet Secretary - this Bill was introduced by Rebecca, of course, originally, earlier in this term. In doing so, she noted that the minimum unit price is not set on the face of the Bill and that there is more work to be done, I think by the unit in Sheffield, to look at what that price would be - and, in due course, it's going to be specified in regulations. Can you let us know about that work and what the latest is on that, and do you expect it to be published sometime in the new year, as I think Rebecca had suggested?
Welsh: Ocê, diolch yn fawr iawn i chi. Croeso mawr i bawb. Fe wnawn ni ddechrau yn syth, os ydych chi'n hapus, gyda cwestiynau ar y Bil Iechyd y Cyhoedd (Isafbris am Alcohol) (Cymru). Os caf i ddechrau - i'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet - cyflwynwyd y Bil gan Rebecca, wrth gwrs, yn wreiddiol, yn gynharach yn y tymor. Wrth gyflwyno'r Bil, fe wnaeth hi nodi nad yw'r isafbris wedi'i bennu ar wyneb y Bil a bod mwy o waith i'w wneud, rwy'n credu gan yr uned yn Sheffield, i bennu beth a fyddai'r pris - ac, maes o law, mewn rheoliadau y byddai hwnnw'n cael ei benderfynu. A fedrwch chi ddiweddaru'r Pwyllgor Cyllid ynglŷn â'r gwaith hwnnw, ac a ydych chi'n disgwyl i hwnnw gael ei gyhoeddi rhywbryd yn y flwyddyn newydd fel yr oedd, rwy'n credu, Rebecca Evans wedi ei amlinellu?
English: And, therefore, what would you - considering that you don't, therefore, want to set it on the face of the Bill at this time, what would your guidance be about how you would set that minimum price? What about health impacts, for example - what about impacts on reducing crime and workplace absence, for example? These are the benefits that have been set out here, of course, and they're all linked to money. Where have you struck the balance there between those different advantages against the costs?
Welsh: Ac, os felly, beth fyddech chi'n - a derbyn nad ydych chi am osod yr isafbris ar wyneb y Bil ar hyn o bryd, beth yw eich canllaw ynglŷn â sut y byddwch chi'n gosod yr isafbris? A ydych chi'n defnyddio'r effaith ar iechyd, a ydych chi'n defnyddio'r effaith ar leihau troseddau, absenoldeb o'r gweithle, er enghraifft? Dyma'r buddion sydd wedi'u gosod yn y Bil ac mae yna arian wedi'i bennu wrth y buddion hynny. Ble ydych chi'n mynd i daro cydbwysedd rhwng gwahanol fuddion y Bil a'u rhoi yn erbyn y costau?
English: Everyone happy? Yes.
Welsh: A ydy pawb yn hapus? Hapus.
English: The first item on our agenda this afternoon is questions to the First Minister, and the first question, Lee Waters.
Welsh: Yr eitem gyntaf ar ein hagenda ni y prynhawn yma yw cwestiynau i'r Prif Weinidog, a'r cwestiwn cyntaf, Lee Waters.
English: Officials are currently in the process of procuring an update of the active travel design guidance, which will build on the first three years of using the guidance and take account of new best practice and regulations. I can say to the Member that all but one local authority have submitted their first integrated network maps by the set date and they're now being appraised, and the remaining authority has been directed to submit their INM by the end of February. So, we are currently considering options for independent validation of the appraisal outcomes, and the Cabinet Secretary will update the Member and the Assembly when the decision has been taken.
Welsh: Mae swyddogion wrthi'n caffael diweddariad o'r canllawiau dylunio teithio llesol ar hyn o bryd, a fydd yn adeiladu ar y tair blynedd gyntaf o ddefnyddio'r canllawiau ac yn cymryd arfer gorau a rheoliadau newydd i ystyriaeth. Gallaf ddweud wrth yr Aelod bod pob awdurdod lleol ac eithrio un wedi cyflwyno eu mapiau rhwydwaith integredig cyntaf erbyn y dyddiad penodedig ac maen nhw'n cael eu gwerthuso erbyn hyn, ac mae'r awdurdod sydd ar ôl wedi ei gyfarwyddo i gyflwyno ei fap rhwydwaith integredig erbyn diwedd mis Chwefror. Felly, rydym ni wrthi'n ystyried dewisiadau ar gyfer dilysu canlyniadau'r gwerthusiad yn annibynnol, a bydd Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn rhoi'r wybodaeth ddiweddaraf i'r Aelod ac i'r Cynulliad pan fydd y penderfyniad wedi ei wneud.
English: Thank you, First Minister. On Friday night, I held the latest of my monthly public meetings, and top of the list of the concerns of people in Tycroes, just as it was in Pontyberem and Llangennech and Kidwelly, was volumes of traffic. Now, the deadline has recently passed for councils to submit their long-term plans for a network of active travel routes they'd like to create over 15 years, and, properly done and funded, these have the potential to cut traffic as well as improve health and local neighbourhoods. But the feedback that the new cross-party group on active travel has heard from right across Wales is that councils aren't being ambitious enough. A bit of route here and there won't encourage people out of their cars. So, would you congratulate Cardiff council for acknowledging that they can improve on their draft and for being willing to submit a more ambitious plan within a year, and what will you do to make sure the plans approved by the Welsh Government set us on a different path?
Welsh: Diolch, Prif Weinidog. Nos Wener, cynhaliais y diweddaraf o'm cyfarfodydd cyhoeddus misol, ac ar frig rhestr pryderon pobl yn Nhycroes, yn union fel yr oedd ym Mhontyberem a Llangennech a Chydweli, oedd maint y traffig. Nawr, mae'r dyddiad terfyn wedi mynd heibio'n ddiweddar i gynghorau gyflwyno eu cynlluniau tymor hir ar gyfer rhwydwaith o lwybrau teithio llesol yr hoffent eu creu dros 15 mlynedd, ac, o'u gwneud a'u hariannu'n iawn, mae gan y rhain y potensial o leihau traffig yn ogystal â gwella iechyd a chymdogaethau lleol. Ond yr adborth y mae'r grŵp trawsbleidiol newydd ar deithio llesol wedi ei glywed o bob cwr o Gymru yw nad yw cynghorau yn bod yn ddigon uchelgeisiol. Ni fydd ychydig o lwybrau yma ac acw yn annog pobl i ddod allan o'u ceir. Felly, a wnewch chi longyfarch Cyngor Caerdydd am gydnabod y gallan nhw wella ar eu drafft ac am fod yn fodlon i gyflwyno cynllun mwy uchelgeisiol o fewn blwyddyn, a beth wnewch chi i wneud yn siŵr bod y cynlluniau a gymeradwywyd gan Lywodraeth Cymru yn ein rhoi ar lwybr gwahanol?