techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, talk about shocking hypocrisy. I have to say that I have got, as we all have, deep concerns about the way the Labour Government has handled this here, but I am not going to take - and nor would I expect the Welsh Labour Government - any lessons from any Conservative when it comes to the administration of benefits to disabled people. My colleague Leanne Wood has just rightly described it as an absolute scandal, and I frankly - though I have every respect for Mark Isherwood as an individual - find it very, very difficult to take those messages from him. I know he absolutely believes them himself, but the party in whose name he sits in this place conducts themselves very differently at the other end of the M4 corridor, and I will happily take an intervention from Mark Isherwood.
Welsh: Wel, sôn am ragrith syfrdanol. Rhaid imi ddweud bod gennyf bryderon dwys, fel sydd gan bawb ohonom, ynghylch y ffordd y mae'r Llywodraeth Lafur wedi ymdrin â hyn yma, ond nid wyf am gymryd unrhyw wersi - ac ni fuaswn yn disgwyl i Lywodraeth Lafur Cymru wneud chwaith - gan yr un Ceidwadwr ar weinyddu budd-daliadau i bobl anabl. Mae fy nghyd-Aelod, Leanne Wood newydd ei ddisgrifio'n gywir fel rhywbeth cwbl warthus, ac a dweud y gwir - er bod gennyf barch mawr at Mark Isherwood fel unigolyn - rwy'n ei chael hi'n anodd tu hwnt ystyried y negeseuon hynny oddi wrtho. Gwn ei fod yn eu credu'n llwyr ei hun, ond mae'r blaid y mae'n ei chynrychioli yn y lle hwn yn ymddwyn mewn ffordd wahanol iawn ar ben arall yr M4, ac rwy'n falch o dderbyn ymyriad gan Mark Isherwood.
English: We've not got time to debate the whole of welfare here, but I made the point that the UK Government, which you are not a great fan of, has nonetheless prevented people with severe disabilities having to be reassessed for a range of benefits - PIP, ESA, universal credit - and yet we've told people with severe disabilities that they will have to be reassessed again to get what they should have kept in the first place.
Welsh: Nid oes gennym amser i drafod lles yn ei gyfanrwydd yma, ond gwneuthum y pwynt fod Llywodraeth y DU, nad ydych yn hoff iawn ohoni, wedi atal pobl ag anableddau difrifol serch hynny rhag gorfod cael eu hailasesu ar gyfer amrywiaeth o fudd-daliadau - y taliad annibyniaeth personol, lwfans cyflogaeth a chymorth, credyd cynhwysol - ac eto rydym ni wedi dweud wrth bobl ag anableddau difrifol y bydd yn rhaid iddynt gael eu hailasesu unwaith eto i gael yr hyn y dylent fod wedi'i gadw yn y lle cyntaf.
English: I will, happily.
Welsh: Gwnaf, â phleser.
English: Do you also find it worrying and very distressful that it's only when they've been backed into a corner by this Plaid Cymru motion today that they have actually taken this step?
Welsh: A yw hefyd yn destun pryder a gofid i chi mai ar ôl iddynt gael eu gwasgu i gornel gan y cynnig hwn gan Blaid Cymru heddiw y cymerwyd y cam hwn ganddynt mewn gwirionedd?
English: Can I finish this sentence? There would be no questions of changes to a care and support package being a cost-cutting measure. Certainly.
Welsh: A gaf fi orffen y frawddeg hon? Ni fyddai unrhyw gwestiwn fod y newidiadau i'r pecyn gofal a chymorth yn fesur ar gyfer torri costau. Yn sicr.
English: Given that former recipients of the independent living fund had to qualify for that by proving that they were severely disabled, why should they have to prove it again when, rightly, we criticised UK Government when they told people they'd have to prove it again?
Welsh: O ystyried bod y rhai a arferai dderbyn y gronfa byw'n annibynnol yn gorfod bod yn gymwys i'w gael drwy brofi eu bod yn ddifrifol anabl, pam y dylent orfod ei brofi eto a ninnau, yn briodol, wedi beirniadu Llywodraeth y DU pan ddywedasant wrth bobl y byddai'n rhaid iddynt ei brofi eto?
English: I think this is because some people have - local authorities had their needs reassessed and downgraded, and this is an opportunity for them to get reassessed and upgraded. It is something that disabled people themselves want to see. It's not perfect, and I'm sure we wish we weren't here. I wish that, last April, the Labour Party conference decision had been implemented in this place, but it wasn't, and that's nothing to do with the Cabinet Minister - or the current leader. I welcome the Minister's acceptance that the underpinning principle in undertaking independent assessment is that the result should be consistent with people's agreed well-being outcomes. As there is no financial barrier, no-one needs have less favourable care and support than they currently have, and 'currently' means whatever they had before the changes were introduced by local authorities. I welcome the preservation of the triangular structure of the grant between the local authority, the individual and a third party stakeholder. I believe the Government of Wales have met the spirit of both the petition and the Labour Party conference resolution. I just regret that it's taken so long. Finally, I thank Nathan Davies for his continual and consistent campaigning - I think I'd describe him as 'indefatigable' - and Julie Morgan for coming through now and providing this continuing support that I believe and I think the vast majority of people in my party believe is something that should have been done a long time ago.
Welsh: Rwy'n meddwl mai'r rheswm am hyn yw bod rhai pobl - cafodd eu hanghenion eu hailasesu a'u hisraddio gan awdurdodau lleol, ac mae hwn yn gyfle iddynt gael eu hailasesu a'u huwchraddio. Mae'n rhywbeth y mae pobl anabl eu hunain am ei weld. Nid yw'n berffaith, ac rwy'n siŵr ein bod yn dymuno nad dyma fel y mae. Byddai'n dda gennyf pe bai penderfyniad cynhadledd y Blaid Lafur fis Ebrill diwethaf wedi'i weithredu yn y lle hwn, ond ni ddigwyddodd hynny, ac nid oes gan hynny ddim i'w wneud â Gweinidog y Cabinet - na'r arweinydd presennol. Rwy'n croesawu'r ffaith bod y Gweinidog yn derbyn mai egwyddor sylfaenol cynnal asesiad annibynnol yw y dylai'r canlyniad fod yn gyson â'r canlyniadau llesiant y bydd pobl wedi cytuno arnynt. Gan nad oes rhwystr ariannol, nid oes raid i neb gael gofal a chymorth llai ffafriol nag y maent yn ei gael ar hyn o bryd, ac mae 'ar hyn o bryd' yn golygu beth bynnag a oedd ganddynt cyn i'r newidiadau gael eu cyflwyno gan awdurdodau lleol. Rwy'n croesawu'r penderfyniad i gadw strwythur trionglog y grant rhwng yr awdurdod lleol, yr unigolyn a rhanddeiliad trydydd parti. Credaf fod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi bodloni ysbryd y ddeiseb a phenderfyniad cynhadledd y Blaid Lafur. Mae'n ddrwg gennyf ei fod wedi cymryd cymaint o amser. Yn olaf, diolch i Nathan Davies am ei ymgyrchu cyson a pharhaus - credaf y buaswn yn ei alw'n 'ddiflino' - ac i Julie Morgan am gyflawni hyn yn awr a darparu'r cymorth parhaus fel rwyf fi, a mwyafrif llethol y bobl yn fy mhlaid yn credu y dylid bod wedi'i wneud amser maith yn ôl.
English: Could I just ask a question, if I may? If it's wrong, as it is, for UK Government to state to a severely disabled person that they have to be reassessed because the benefits have changed, to see whether they qualify for the successor benefit, why is it right in Wales to say to somebody who qualified on the grounds of their severe disability for a benefit that they have to be reassessed? I understand that those who have lost their care and support packages now need to have them reinstated and there has to be a process to be followed, but why can we not say that because they had already qualified for ILF, just like DLA in England, they don't have to go through the process of reapplying, just as they have to with PIP in England?
Welsh: A gaf fi ofyn cwestiwn? Os yw'n anghywir, fel y mae, i Lywodraeth y DU ddatgan wrth berson ag anabledd difrifol fod yn rhaid iddynt gael eu hailasesu am fod y budd-daliadau wedi newid, i weld a ydynt yn gymwys ar gyfer y budd-dal olynol, pam y mae'n iawn yng Nghymru i ddweud wrth rywun a oedd yn gymwys i gael budd-dal ar sail eu hanabledd difrifol fod yn rhaid iddynt gael eu hailasesu? Rwy'n deall bod y rhai sydd wedi colli eu pecynnau gofal a chymorth bellach angen eu cael wedi'u hadfer a bod yna broses i'w dilyn, ond pam na allwn ddweud, oherwydd eu bod eisoes yn gymwys ar gyfer y gronfa byw'n annibynnol, yn union fel y lwfans byw i'r anabl yn Lloegr, nad oes yn rhaid iddynt fynd drwy'r broses o ailymgeisio, fel sy'n rhaid iddynt ei wneud gyda'r taliad annibyniaeth personol yn Lloegr?
English: The proposal is to agree the motion without amendment. Does any Member object? The motion without amendment is therefore agreed in accordance with Standing Order 12.36.
Welsh: Y cwestiwn yw: a ddylid derbyn y cynnig heb ei ddiwygio? A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? Felly, derbynnir y cynnig heb ei ddiwygio yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 12.36.
English: Neil, thank you so much for giving way. I just want to make the observation that, even under the ECHR determination, and their previous judgments, there are European countries who operate with no restrictions on voting rights - in effect, a universal franchise for prisoners. There are others who operate with restrictions. They've interpreted exactly the same determination in very different ways. They've applied their sovereignty even under that judgment.
Welsh: Neil, diolch yn fawr iawn am ildio. Rwyf am wneud y sylw, hyd yn oed o dan ddyfarniad Llys Hawliau Dynol Ewrop, ac yn eu dyfarniadau blaenorol, mae yna wledydd yn Ewrop sy'n gweithredu heb unrhyw gyfyngiadau ar hawliau pleidleisio - etholfraint gyffredinol ar gyfer carcharorion i bob pwrpas. Ceir eraill sy'n gweithredu gyda chyfyngiadau. Maent wedi dehongli yn union yr un penderfyniad mewn ffyrdd gwahanol iawn. Maent wedi cymhwyso eu sofraniaeth hyd yn oed o dan y dyfarniad hwnnw.
English: I don't think that we should get too hung up on the European Court of Justice. We're about to leave it. You and many other people, like Theresa May, are very obsessed about this. Just let's look at the objective, which is to support the reintegration of prisoners into normal life and to tackle our appalling record on recidivism. Clearly, we are spending loads of money on something that's not working.
Welsh: Nid wyf yn meddwl y dylem boeni'n ormodol am Lys Cyfiawnder Ewrop. Rydym ar fin ei adael. Mae gennych chi a llawer o bobl eraill, fel Theresa May, obsesiwn mawr ynglŷn â hyn. Gadewch i ni edrych ar yr amcan, sef cefnogi ailintegreiddiad carcharorion i fywyd normal a mynd i'r afael â'n record warthus ar droseddu parhaus. Yn amlwg, rydym yn gwario llawer o arian ar rywbeth nad yw'n gweithio.
English: I have selected the three amendments to the motion. If amendment 1 is agreed, amendments 2 and 3 will be deselected. I call on the Minister for Housing and Local Government to move formally amendment 1, tabled in the Rebecca Evans.
Welsh: Rwyf wedi dethol y tri gwelliant i'r cynnig. Os derbynnir gwelliant 1, caiff gwelliannau 2 a 3 eu dad-ddethol. Dwi'n galw ar y Gweinidog Tai a Llywodraeth Leol i gynnig yn ffurfiol gwelliant 1, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Rebecca Evans.
English: Is he aware that prisoners already exercise their right to vote? They tend to vote by post or proxy.
Welsh: A yw'n ymwybodol fod carcharorion eisoes yn arfer eu hawl i bleidleisio? Maent yn tueddu i bleidleisio drwy'r post neu drwy ddirprwy.
English: The right to vote, as far as I recall from our inquiry in Wales, was actually extended by that ECHR ruling and the application of it to -
Welsh: Yn ôl yr hyn a gofiaf o'n hymchwiliad yng Nghymru, estynnwyd yr hawl i bleidleisio gan y dyfarniad hwnnw gan Lys Hawliau Dynol Ewrop a'i chymhwyso ar gyfer -
English: Prisoners on remand.
Welsh: Carcharorion ar remánd.
English: Ah, prisoners on remand. Okay, that is a precise issue.
Welsh: A, carcharorion ar remánd. Iawn, mae hwnnw'n fater penodol.
English: They're not convicted when they're on remand.
Welsh: Nid ydynt wedi'u heuogfarnu pan fyddant ar remánd.
English: I call on the Minister for Housing and Local Government - Julie James.
Welsh: Galwaf ar y Gweinidog Tai a Llywodraeth Leol - Julie James.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. I welcome the opportunity to restate the Welsh Government's commitment to working to ensure that prison is an environment that is safe and secure, enabling staff and resources to concentrate on the rehabilitation of offenders. The first statement in the UKIP motion is inherently contradictory. The decision to send someone to prison and deprive them of their liberty is obviously an act of punishment in itself. Once that punishment is achieved, we should focus on rehabilitation. I strongly believe that the focus in prisons should be on rehabilitation and reconnecting inmates with the values of society at large. Of course, the prison service is the responsibility of the UK Government. The Welsh Government works closely with the Ministry of Justice and Her Majesty's Prison and Probation Service to provide devolved services that are vital in maintaining prisoner welfare and reducing reoffending. We reject the Conservative amendments, which appear designed to ignore the very large contribution made by devolved services.
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Rwy'n croesawu'r cyfle i ailddatgan ymrwymiad Llywodraeth Cymru i weithio i sicrhau bod carchar yn amgylchedd sy'n ddiogel ac yn saff, gan alluogi staff ac adnoddau i ganolbwyntio ar adsefydlu troseddwyr. Mae'r datganiad cyntaf yng nghynnig UKIP yn gwrthddweud ei hun yn ei hanfod. Mae'r penderfyniad i anfon rhywun i garchar a'u hamddifadu o'u rhyddid yn weithred o gosb ynddi'i hun yn amlwg. Pan gyflawnir y gosb honno, dylem ganolbwyntio ar adsefydlu. Credaf yn gryf y dylid canolbwyntio mewn carchardai ar adsefydlu ac ailgysylltu carcharorion â gwerthoedd y gymdeithas yn gyffredinol. Wrth gwrs, cyfrifoldeb Llywodraeth y DU yw'r gwasanaeth carchardai. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn gweithio'n agos gyda'r Weinyddiaeth Gyfiawnder a Gwasanaeth Carchardai a Phrawf ei Mawrhydi i ddarparu gwasanaethau datganoledig sy'n hanfodol er mwyn cynnal lles carcharorion a lleihau aildroseddu. Rydym yn gwrthod gwelliannau'r Ceidwadwyr, sydd i'w gweld fel pe baent wedi'u llunio ar gyfer anwybyddu'r cyfraniad mawr iawn a wneir gan wasanaethau datganoledig.
English: The proposal is to agree the motion unamended. Does any Member object? [ Objection.] I will defer voting on this item until voting time.
Welsh: Y cwestiwn yw: a ddylid derbyn y cynnig heb ei ddiwygio? A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu. [ Gwrthwynebiad.] Gohiriaf y bleidlais ar yr eitem, felly, tan y cyfnod pleidleisio.
English: Before I call voting time - a point of order. Jane Hutt.
Welsh: Cyn i fi alw'r cyfnod pleidleisio - pwynt o drefn. Jane Hutt.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. I want to raise a point of order under Standing Order 12.37 that an objection was verbally made to the Plaid Cymru debate NDM6967. So, can you review and make a statement on the status of that motion? I made an objection and it was heard by colleagues.
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Hoffwn godi pwynt o drefn o dan Reol Sefydlog 12.37 fod gwrthwynebiad wedi'i wneud ar lafar i ddadl Plaid Cymru NDM6967. Felly, a allwch adolygu a gwneud datganiad ar statws y cynnig hwnnw? Gwneuthum wrthwynebiad ac fe'i clywyd gan gyd-Aelodau.
English: Thank you for the point of order and for alerting me of your intention to make this point. I didn't hear the objection and neither did the clerk - [ Interruption.] I don't need any supporting noises anywhere, please - and neither did the clerks on the front bench. I apologise for that. It's a lesson for me to listen closer. It's a lesson for you to shout louder. The motion was declared as having been passed by me in the Chamber. Members will have heard me say that, and that motion cannot be undone at this point. But your objection and the fact that you raised that objection has been noted for the record, and the Government's viewpoint on that is now on the record, but the motion without amendment was passed earlier on this afternoon.
Welsh: Diolch am godi'r pwynt o drefn ac am roi gwybod i mi ynglŷn â'ch bwriad i godi'r pwynt hwn. Ni chlywais y gwrthwynebiad ac ni chlywodd y clerc chwaith - [ Torri ar draws.] Nid oes angen unrhyw synau cefnogol arnaf, os gwelwch yn dda - ac ni chlywodd y clercod ar y fainc flaen chwaith. Ymddiheuraf am hynny. Mae'n wers i mi wrando'n fwy astud. Mae'n wers i chi weiddi'n uwch. Gwneuthum ddatganiad yn y Siambr fod y cynnig wedi'i dderbyn. Bydd yr Aelodau wedi fy nghlywed yn dweud hynny, ac ni ellir dadwneud y cynnig hwnnw ar y pwynt hwn. Ond mae eich gwrthwynebiad a'r ffaith eich bod wedi codi'r gwrthwynebiad hwnnw wedi'i gofnodi, ac mae safbwynt y Llywodraeth ar hynny wedi'i gofnodi, ond derbyniwyd y cynnig heb ei ddiwygio yn gynharach y prynhawn yma.
English: This brings us to voting time. Unless three Members wish for the bell to be rung, I will move to the vote on the UKIP debate: prisons and prisoners. I call for a vote on the motion tabled in the name of Gareth Bennett. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 13, one abstention, 34 against. Therefore, the motion is not agreed.
Welsh: Daw hyn â ni at y cyfnod pleidleisio. Oni bai fod tri Aelod yn dymuno i fi ganu'r gloch, dwi'n symud at y bleidlais, felly, ar ddadl UKIP ar garchardai a charcharorion. Dwi'n galw am bleidlais ar y cynnig a gyflwynwyd yn enw Gareth Bennett. Agorwch y bleidlais. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid 13, un yn ymatal, 34 yn erbyn. Felly, gwrthodwyd y cynnig.
English: That brings us to amendment 1. If amendment 1 is agreed, amendments 2 and 3 will be deselected. I call for a vote on amendment 1 tabled in the name of Rebecca Evans. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 33, no abstentions, 15 against. Therefore, amendment 1 is agreed. Amendments 2 and 3 are deselected.
Welsh: Sy'n dod â ni at welliant 1. Os derbynnir gwelliant 1, caiff gwelliannau 2 a 3 eu dad-ddethol. Dwi'n galw am bleidlais ar welliant 1 a gyflwynwyd yn enw Rebecca Evans. Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid 33, neb yn ymatal, 15 yn erbyn. Felly, derbyniwyd gwelliant 1. Dad-ddetholwyd gwelliant 2 a 3.
English: This brings us to a vote on the motion as amended.
Welsh: Sy'n dod â ni at y bleidlais ar y cynnig wedi'i ddiwygio.
English: Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 34, four abstentions, 10 against. Therefore, the motion as amended is agreed.
Welsh: Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid 34, pedwar yn ymatal, 10 yn erbyn. Felly, mae'r cynnig wedi ei ddiwygio wedi ei dderbyn.
English: If people are leaving the Chamber, can they do so quickly and quietly? We do have the short debate.
Welsh: Os oes pobl yn gadael y Siambr, a allant wneud hynny'n gyflym ac yn dawel? Mae gennym y ddadl fer.
English: I now move to the short debate and I call on Dai Lloyd to speak on the topic he has chosen. Dai Lloyd.
Welsh: Symudaf yn awr at y ddadl fer, a galwaf ar Dai Lloyd i siarad ar y pwnc a ddewiswyd ganddo. Dai Lloyd.
English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. The title is: air quality legislation fit for modern challenges. Now, I'm not sure whether I have ever mentioned before that I have been a doctor in Swansea for 35 years or so, with the challenges of lung health and heart health amongst the most common conditions that I continually deal with. The rates of asthma have been increasing in our children for decades, and there is no valid explanation, only the rates of air pollution that some children have to breathe regularly. And these small particles, the PM10 and PM2.5 particles, which come from diesel and petrol fumes, as well as the tyres of the vehicles distributing small grains of rubber and plastics to the air, and the nitrogen dioxide - that poisonous gas that comes from the burning of diesel - are all being breathed into the lungs. And some of these particles are so small - nano-particles, as they're called - that they not only reach the smallest tubes in our lungs, but can go immediately into the blood flow too and reach our hearts directly and cause a response in the muscle in the wall of the heart. Therefore, that is why this is a crisis - a crisis that has become more and more critical recently.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Dirprwy Lywydd. Y teitl ydy: deddfwriaeth ansawdd awyr sy'n addas ar gyfer heriau modern. Nawr, dwi ddim yn siŵr a ydw i wedi crybwyll erioed o'r blaen yn fan hyn fy mod i wedi bod yn feddyg yn Abertawe ers rhyw 35 mlynedd bellach, gyda heriau iechyd yr ysgyfaint a'r galon gyda'r mwyaf cyffredin o'r cyflyrau dwi'n gorfod delio efo nhw'n wastadol. Mae cyfraddau'r anadlwst neu'r fogfa - dyna i chi ddau air Cymraeg am asthma - mae cyfraddau'r anadlwst ar gynnydd yn ein plant ers degawdau, ac nid oes esboniad dilys arall yn y bôn, dim ond graddfeydd y llygredd yn yr awyr y mae rhai plant yn gorfod ei anadlu yn gyson. Ac mae'r gronynnau bychan, y PM10 a'r PM2.5, sy'n dod o danwydd diesel a phetrol, yn ogystal â theiars y ceir yn gwasgaru gronynnau bychan o rwber a phlastig i'r awyr, a'r nitrogen deuocsid - y nwy gwenwynig yna sy'n deillio o losgi diesel - oll yn cael eu hanadlu i mewn i'r ysgyfaint. Ac mae rhai o'r gronynnau yma mor fach - nano-gronynnau, fel dŷn ni'n eu galw nhw - fel eu bod nhw nid yn unig yn cyrraedd y pibellau mwyaf main yn ein hysgyfaint, ond yn gallu mynd drwodd yn uniongyrchol i gylchredeg yn y gwaed hefyd, a chyrraedd ein calonnau yn uniongyrchol ac achosi adwaith yn y cyhyr sydd yn wal ein calonnau ni. Felly, dyna pam mae hwn yn argyfwng - argyfwng sydd wedi dod yn fwy pwysig yn ddiweddar.
English: We have had a lot of questions on governance, so I don't want to ask them again, but I just wanted to draw out what was said by Professor Docherty in terms of: do you believe that the system of a limited company is the system that could have been chosen here in Wales? Do you think that it's going to be able to operate with the objectives that are in place, or do you believe that there's a different set-up or a better set-up that should have been considered?
Welsh: Dŷn ni wedi cael lot o'r cwestiynau ar lywodraethiant, felly dwi ddim eisiau eu gofyn nhw eto, ond roedd e jest yn trio tynnu mas tipyn bach o'r hyn a ddywedwyd gan Professor Docherty o ran a ydych chi'n credu mai'r system limited company yw'r system a ddylai fod wedi'i ddewis yma yng Nghymru? Ydych chi'n credu ei fod e'n mynd i allu gweithredu gyda'r amcanion sydd ohonynt mewn golwg, neu ydych chi'n credu y byddai yna set-up gwahanol neu well y gellid bod wedi edrych arno?