techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: In terms of the positives, standards certainly are less ambiguous in terms of their content than the language schemes, and that was one of the aims of the Measure originally. In terms of the less positive issues, there are a number of things, and a number have been mentioned already. One is that the new system is too complex in many ways. Secondly, there was some confusion about promotion - whether it was the commissioner or the Government that was responsible for that and how. There was also some confusion about what the role of the commissioner was - that of an ombudsman or a regulator. Finally, there was some confusion about the independence of that post and specifically so in its relationship with Government. So, very succinctly, those are the issues.
Welsh: O ran pethau cadarnhaol, mae safonau yn bendant yn llai amwys o ran cynnwys na chynlluniau iaith, a dyna oedd un o fwriadau'r Mesur yn wreiddiol. O ran pethau llai cadarnhaol, mae yna nifer o bethau - rhai ohonyn nhw wedi codi yn barod. Un yw bod y drefn newydd yn rhy gymhleth mewn gwahanol ffyrdd. Yn ail, roedd yna ddryswch ynglŷn â hybu - pwy yn y Llywodraeth, neu ai'r comisiynydd, oedd i fod yn gyfrifol am hynny ac ym mha ffyrdd? Hefyd, roedd yna ddryswch ynglŷn â beth yn union oedd rôl y comisiynydd - ai ombwdsmon neu reoleiddiwr oedd y comisiynydd i fod? Yn olaf, roedd yna ddryswch, rydw i'n meddwl, ynglŷn ag ystyr annibyniaeth y swyddfa honno, a hynny'n neilltuol mewn perthynas â'r Llywodraeth. Felly, yn gryno iawn, iawn, dyna - .
English: Thank you. I'm aware of time, Chair, so carry on.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Rwy'n ymwybodol o amser, Gadeirydd, felly cariwch ymlaen.
English: I think the key word here, rather than thinking of language schemes being 'voluntary', because at the end of the day, they're not voluntary - . If an organisation is instructed to agree a language scheme, they have to do that, and, once they have agreed to that scheme, then it's not voluntary as to whether they implement that scheme or not, but rather it's a statutory requirement. I do think it's more useful for us to think to what extent some things are negotiable between a public body and a commissioner or a commission, and to what extent things should be set out as a matter of law through a legislature such as the Assembly. I think, simply, that there are core issues that should be legislated on through the legislature, but there are a range of other things that are best left to that negotiation between individual public bodies and the regulatory body, such as a commission or a commissioner. There are a number of reasons for that, but mainly it is in order to allow flexibility within the system in order to recognise different strengths and weaknesses in terms of language in different geographical areas. The Welsh language isn't as strong in all parts of Wales, and therefore what would work in Gwynedd wouldn't necessarily work in Caerphilly. Having said that, there are certain things that Gwynedd and Caerphilly should be doing, and you can do that by making that a requirement through regulation. There are other things that need to be discussed in negotiating and recognising those differences.
Welsh: Rydw i'n meddwl mai'r gair allweddol yn fan hyn, yn hytrach nag ein bod ni'n meddwl am gynlluniau iaith fel pethau 'gwirfoddol' oherwydd, ar ddiwedd y dydd, nid ydyn nhw'n wirfoddol - . Os yw corff yn derbyn gorchymyn i gytuno ar gynllun iaith, wedyn maen nhw'n gorfod gwneud hynny, ac unwaith iddyn nhw gytuno ar gynllun iaith, wedyn nid yw e'n wirfoddol i b'un ai gweithredu hynny ai peidio, ond yn hytrach mae'n fater o raid statudol. Rydw i'n meddwl ei bod hi'n fwy defnyddiol i ni feddwl i ba raddau mae rhai pethau'n werth eu negodi neu 'negotiate-o' rhwng cyrff cyhoeddus a chorff fel comisiynydd neu gomisiwn, ac i ba raddau mae pethau'n werth eu gosod fel mater o gyfraith drwy ddeddfwrfa fel y Cynulliad. Rydw i'n meddwl, yn syml iawn, fod yna wraidd o bethau sydd yn werth deddfu yn eu cylch nhw drwy'r ddeddfwrfa, ond bod yna amrediad o bethau eraill sydd yn werth gadael i'r drafodaeth yna, i'r negodi yna, rhwng cyrff cyhoeddus yn unigol, ac yn y corff rheoleiddio neu rywbeth tebyg, fel comisiwn neu gomisiynydd. Mae yna sawl rheswm am hynny, ond yn bennaf y rheswm yw er mwyn caniatáu hyblygrwydd yn y system, er mwyn cydnabod gwahanol gryfderau a gwendidau iaith mewn gwahanol rannau o'r wlad sydd o dan sylw. Nid yw'r Gymraeg mor gryf ym mhob man yng Nghymru, felly beth fydd yn gweithio yng Ngwynedd, fydd hynny ddim o reidrwydd yn gweithio yng Nghaerffili. Wedi dweud hynny, mae rhai pethau y dylai Caerffili a Gwynedd fod yn eu gwneud, ac mae rhywun yn gallu gwneud hynny drwy osod hynny fel dyletswydd drwy reoliadau. Mae yna bethau eraill sydd yn angenrheidiol i'w trafod wrth negodi a chydnabod y gwahaniaethau yna.
English: Anyone else? You don't have to answer every question.
Welsh: Unrhyw un arall? Nid oes rhaid i chi ateb bob cwestiwn.
English: Just two things very briefly. I think it would be a very good thing if a complainant had to go initially to the body that they are complaining against, rather than having the right to go immediately to the commissioner. I think it's a matter of common practice in areas where organisations deal with complaints in all sorts of different areas that there should be an opportunity for the organisation to put the complaint right before the complainant goes to some third party to seek some sort of resolution. Also, it would be a good thing if the complainant had to demonstrate that they had suffered personally as a result of what has happened, so that we can avoid people making complaints by proxy on behalf of others, so that the system treats the complaints of real citizens rather than dealing with something else. There is a question arising as to the meaning of 'serious' in terms of the new system, and I would be interested to see how one would come up with a mechanism to define that.
Welsh: Dau beth yn sydyn iawn. Rydw i'n meddwl ei fod e'n dda iawn o beth - wel, mi fyddai o'n dda iawn o beth - petai achwynydd yn gorfod mynd at y corff mae'n cwyno yn ei erbyn yn y lle cyntaf, yn hytrach na bod hawl gyda nhw i fynd yn uniongyrchol at y comisiynydd. Rydw i'n meddwl ei fod e'n fater o arfer cyffredin yn y meysydd lle mae cyrff yn trin cwynion mewn bob math o wahanol feysydd fod yna gyfle gan y corff i wneud yn iawn am y gŵyn yn y lle cyntaf cyn bod rhywun yn mynd at ryw drydydd parti er mwyn chwilio am ffordd o ddatrys y broblem. Hefyd, byddai'n dda o beth petai y person sydd yn cyflwyno'r gŵyn yn gorfod dangos ei bod nhw wedi dioddef yn bersonol yn sgil beth bynnag sydd wedi digwydd, fel ein bod ni'n osgoi pobl yn cwyno ar ran rhyw bobl eraill, ac yn y blaen, ac fel bod y system yn trin pryderon dinasyddion go iawn yn hytrach na rhywbeth gwahanol i hynny. Mae yna ryw gwestiwn yn codi ynglyn â beth yw ystyr difrifol cynigion y Llywodraeth ynglyn â'r drefn newydd, a buaswn i'n ymddiddori mewn gweld sut mae rhywun yn mynd i greu mecanwaith ar gyfer diffinio beth yw 'difrifol'.
English: We'll come onto that. Robert, briefly, do you have anything to say on this?
Welsh: Rŷm ni'n dod ymlaen at hynny. Robert, yn fyr, a oes rhywbeth gyda chi ar hyn?
English: No, I generally accept what the others witnesses have said. On this question of serious breaches, I think that there should be some caution here. The Canadian experience is often that if a particular breach has been found to have existed, it may not look like a particularly major thing. It might involve failure to deliver a form or something like that, but it can have significant consequences in terms of changes in practice. So, I think that the threshold - . The whole purpose of the complaint is to put power in the hands of the citizen in the first instance, and I think they should err on the side of letting the citizen have their day, as it were.
Welsh: Na, yn gyffredinol yr wyf yn derbyn beth y mae eraill wedi dweud tystion. Ar y cwestiwn hwn o achosion difrifol o dorri, credaf y dylid bod yn ofalus yma. Brofiad Canada yn aml na os canfuwyd achos penodol wedi bodoli, efallai y bydd mae'n edrych fel peth arbennig mawr. Gallai olygu methiant i ddarparu ffurflen neu rywbeth fel hynny, ond gall gael goblygiadau sylweddol o ran newidiadau mewn ymarfer. Felly, credaf fod y trothwy - . Holl bwrpas y gŵyn yw rhoi grym yn nwylo y dinesydd yn y lle cyntaf, a chredaf y dylai piau gosod y dinesydd wedi eu diwrnod, fel petai.
English: Moving on, I just wanted to ask Rónán, as you're here, is there anything that's part of the 2011 Measure that is so good and so attractive that you would want to adopt for Ireland, because I think you are perhaps at a different stage or in a different situation to us here in Wales at the moment?
Welsh: Gan symud ymlaen, roeddwn i jest eisiau gofyn i Rónán yn fras, gan eich bod chi yma, a oes yna unrhyw beth yn rhan o Fesur 2011 sydd mor dda, sydd mor wefreiddiol y byddech chi eisiau ei fabwysiadu ar gyfer Iwerddon gan eich bod chi, rwy'n credu, ar gam, efallai, neu mewn sefyllfa wahanol i ni ar hyn o bryd yma yng Nghymru?
English: Is there a reason why you're saying that a commission would work better?
Welsh: A oes yna reswm pam rydych chi'n dweud bod y comisiwn yn gweithio'n well na - ?
English: The commissioner is a corporation sole, and that means that, at the end of the day, as a matter of statutory requirement, there is an individual taking decisions on everything that that organisation does, and whatever that organisation does does depend, to a great extent, on the skills, experience, and the personality of the post holder -
Welsh: Wel, mae'r comisiynydd yn gorfforaeth unigol - neu corporation sole - a mae hynny'n meddwl, ar ddiwedd y dydd, fel mater o raid statudol, un person sydd yn cymryd penderfyniadau ynglŷn â phopeth mae'r corff yna'n ei wneud, ac mae beth bynnag mae'r corff yna yn ei wneud yn dibynnu i raddau helaeth ar sgiliau, profiadau a phersonoliaeth y person sydd yn dal y swydd hon -
English: Well, yes, but I'm a little concerned about comparing commissioners in that way because the Welsh Language Commissioner is slightly different to the other commissioners and there are even fundamental differences between the different language commissioners internationally. But a body corporate would be very different to that, in the sense that you would have various authorised individuals within the organisation who could take decisions in a more authoritative way, and then the burden is also shared in terms of decision making on the various issues before that organisation. It would mean that the burden is shared in terms of decision making, there is less risk in taking decisions and it works better in that regard. Now, it may be a slower process because one has to create internal procedures in order to allow for simple things such as arranging meetings for those individuals to come together. It takes time to take joint decisions - whereas in a corporation sole, an individual can take a decision and that's it, because it is essentially their decision.
Welsh: Ie, ond rydw i'n poeni ychydig am gymharu comisiynwyr fel yna achos mae Comisiynydd y Gymraeg ychydig yn wahanol i'r comisiynwyr eraill, ac mae hyd yn oed gwahaniaethau sylfaenol rhwng y gwahanol gomisiynwyr iaith yn rhyngwladol, ond mae corfforaeth gyfansawdd wedyn yn wahanol iawn i hynny yn yr ystyr mae gyda chi wahanol unigolion awdurdodedig o fewn y corff sydd yn gallu cymryd penderfyniadau mewn ffordd fwy awdurdodol, ac mae rhywun yn gorfod rhannu'r faich hefyd o gymryd penderfyniadau ynglŷn â gwahanol faterion sydd yn dod gerbron y corff. Mae e'n meddwl bod rhannu baich o ran cymryd penderfyniadau, mae llai o risg wrth gymryd penderfyniadau ac mae e'n gweithio'n well o ran hynny. O bosibl ei fod yn arafach, oherwydd mae rhywun yn gorfod creu gweithdrefn fewnol i'r corff er mwyn caniatáu am, er enghraifft, bethau syml fel cyfarfodydd i'r gwahanol unigolion yna ddod at ei gilydd. Mae'n cymryd amser i gymryd penderfyniadau ar y cyd ac yn y blaen - lle mae corfforaeth unigol, mae'r person yn gallu cymryd penderfyniad a dyna nhw, maen nhw'n gallu cymryd penderfyniad oherwydd nhw sy'n penderfynu.
English: Anyone else? We need to keep questions and responses shorter, please. Does anyone have anything else, or another view on the private sector? Robert?
Welsh: Unrhyw un arall? Mae'n rhaid inni gael cwestiynau ac atebion byrrach, sori. A oes unrhyw un arall â barn ar y sector preifat? Robert?
English: Very briefly, I think there are different aspects of the Measure that could be tidied up, and, in that regard, the introduction of legislation would be timely. Is that succinct enough for you?
Welsh: Yn gryno iawn, rydw i'n meddwl bod yna wahanol agweddau ar y Mesur sydd yn werth eu tacluso, ac, yn hynny o beth, mae cyflwyno deddfwriaeth yn amserol. A ydy hynny'n ddigon cryno?
English: Do the other witnesses agree with what happened, or do you have a different view?
Welsh: A ydy'r tystion eraill yn cytuno â'r hyn a oedd wedi digwydd, neu a oes gyda chi barn wahanol?
English: Making comparisons with other nations is always interesting, but you also need to be careful too, because the political, linguistic - and so on - context is different in the various different countries, of course. In terms of what the Government is proposing in Wales, then there are weaknesses within the Measure, and I do think that the various weaknesses within the Measure have now become sufficiently apparent, and therefore it is worth moving to put those right. Waiting longer isn't going to improve the situation in terms of those weaknesses within the Measure, but it's likely that those weaknesses will become far more apparent and painful for us all. So, in that regard, if it isn't working in various different ways then you need to put that right. There are also very good reasons for the creation of a commission in the way in which the Government is suggesting, and that is an issue of cost-efficiency. Now, you could argue for the retention of the Welsh Language Commissioner and the creation of a new body to promote the Welsh language, but that would be more expensive than creating one body that can do both things simultaneously, not unlike the former Welsh language board, but I don't think that we are talking about re-establishing the Welsh language board. There should be some very fundamental differences between the proposed commission and the Welsh language board as was in terms of securing democratic accountability for the new body and so on and so forth. So, in that regard, there are very good reasons for doing what the Government is proposing, and there are very good reasons for doing so now.
Welsh: Mae cymharu â gwledydd eraill wastad yn ddiddorol. Mae angen bod yn ofalus hefyd, bob tro, achos mae cyd-destun gwleidyddol, ieithyddol - ac yn y blaen, ac yn y blaen - gwahanol lefydd yn wahanol iawn, iawn. O ran yr hyn y mae'r Llywodraeth yn ei gynnig yng Nghymru, mae yna wendidau gyda'r Mesur, ac rydw i'n meddwl bod gwahanol wendidau sydd erbyn hyn yn ddigon amlwg, ac, yn hynny o beth, mae'n werth symud at drwsio'r gwendidau hynny. Nid yw aros rhagor o amser yn mynd i wneud y gwendidau yna fod yn well, ond, yn hytrach, mae'n bosibl y bydd y gwendidau yn mynd yn fwyfwy poenus i ni i gyd. Felly, yn hynny o beth, os nad yw'r peth yn gweithio mewn gwahanol ffyrdd, yna mae angen trwsio hynny. Mae yna resymau da iawn hefyd ynglŷn â chreu comisiwn yn y ffordd y mae'r Llywodraeth am wneud hynny - hynny yw, cost-effeithiolrwydd. Mi fyddai yna ddadl digon rhesymol dros gadw Comisiynydd y Gymraeg ac yna greu corff arall newydd er mwyn hybu'r Gymraeg, ond wrth gwrs mi fyddai hynny yn fwy costus na jest creu un corff a allai wneud y ddau beth ar yr un pryd, nid yn annhebyg i fwrdd yr iaith Gymraeg cynt, ond nid ydym ni yn sôn, nid wyf yn meddwl, am ail-greu bwrdd yr iaith Gymraeg. Dylai fod yna wahaniaethau sylfaenol iawn rhwng y comisiwn arfaethedig yma a bwrdd yr iaith Gymraeg, ac yn neilltuol o ran sicrhau atebolrwydd democrataidd i'r corff newydd ac yn y blaen. So, yn hynny o beth, mae yna resymau da iawn dros wneud beth mae'r Llywodraeth yn cynnig ei wneud, ac mae yna resymau da iawn dros wneud hynny nawr.
English: If you can keep it brief, yes, because we have to finish now.
Welsh: Os yw'n fras, ie, achos mae'n rhaid inni orffen nawr.
English: Right. Thank you very much for attending today. If you think you haven't had an opportunity to say everything you wanted to today because of time constraints, please write to us, e-mail us, and we'd be very pleased to hear from you. But thank you very much for coming here today and thank you very much to Rónán for making the journey from Ireland. I'm sure that you will return to us, to Wales, and I hope that you've enjoyed your time with us today. Thank you, as well, to Robert, for attending to provide evidence and to Diarmait as well. If it's okay, we'll move on to the next item. Thank you very much.
Welsh: Iawn. Diolch yn fawr iawn ichi am ddod i mewn atom heddiw. Os nad ydych chi'n credu eich bod wedi cael cyfle i ddweud popeth yr oeddech chi eisiau ei ddweud heddiw am resymau amser, yna plis ysgrifennwch atom ni, e-bostiwch, a byddem ni'n falch iawn o glywed gennych chi. Ond diolch ichi am ddod yma heddiw a diolch yn fawr iawn i Rónán am wneud y daith o'r Iwerddon. Mae'n siŵr y byddech chi yn dod yn ôl atom, i Gymru, a gobeithio'ch bod wedi mwynhau eich amser yma heddiw. Diolch eto i Robert hefyd am ddod atom i roi tystiolaeth, ac i Diarmait hefyd. Os yw'n iawn, gwnawn ni symud ymlaen at yr eitem nesaf. Diolch yn fawr iawn.
English: Item 5, papers to note: ITV Cymru Wales's consultation response to Ofcom on electronic programme guides. Does anyone have anything to say, any comment, or are you content to note?
Welsh: Eitem 5, papurau i'w nodi: ymateb ITV Cymru Wales i ymgynghoriad Ofcom ynghylch canllawiau rhaglenni electronig. A oes gan unrhyw un unrhyw sylwad ar hyn, neu ydych chi'n hapus i'w nodi?
English: Content to note.
Welsh: Hapus i'w nodi.
English: Motion under Standing Order 17.42 to resolve to exclude the public from the meeting for the next business. All content?
Welsh: Cynnig o dan Reol Sefydlog 17.34 i wahardd y cyhoedd o'r cyfarfod ar gyfer y materion nesaf. A ydy pawb yn hapus?
English: Content.
Welsh: Rwy'n hapus.
English: Content and happy. Thank you.
Welsh: Hapus ac yn llawen. Diolch.
English: The question of accessibility can mean a number of different things, and what isn't clear and perhaps needs further consideration in this legislation is this concept of what 'accessibility' means and what is meant by it in the legislation. It could be in terms of the accessibility of the two versions of the legislation; it could be accessibility in terms of clarity of terms and concepts on any specific issue all brought together in one piece of legislation, rather than existing across a number of different pieces of legislation; but it could also mean the availability and concurrence of the legislation in various commercial sources, such as LexisNexis and Westlaw, but also those sources that are available free of charge to the public. So, accessibility can encapsulate those various different elements as well as secondary materials, for example, for advice websites or textbooks for students. So, the range of what exactly is meant by 'accessibility' is something that needs to be defined in greater detail in terms of your concept of accessibility in order to measure success. Has the law become more accessible or not?
Welsh: Mae cwestiwn hygyrchedd yn golygu sawl peth gwahanol, a beth sydd yn aneglur a beth sydd, efallai, eisiau'i drafod ymhellach yn y Ddeddf yma ydy'r syniad o beth ydy'r ystyr o hygyrchedd a fwriedir? Fe allai fod yn hygyrchedd o ran hygyrchedd dwy fersiwn y ddeddfwriaeth; fe allai fod yn hygyrchedd o safbwynt eglurder y termau a chysyniadau'r gyfraith ar bwnc penodol wedi'u crynhoi i mewn i un Ddeddf, yn hytrach na bod ar draws sawl darn o ddeddfwriaeth; ond fe all o hefyd olygu argaeledd a pha mor gyfredol yw'r ddeddfwriaeth mewn gwahanol ffynonellau masnachol, megis LexisNexis a Westlaw, ond hefyd ffynonellau sydd ar gael am ddim i'r cyhoedd. Felly, mae'r hygyrchedd yn gallu cwmpasu'r gwahanol elfennau yna yn ogystal â deunydd eilaidd, er enghraifft, ar gyfer gwefannau cynghori neu werslyfrau i fyfyrwyr. Mae'r rhychwant o beth yn union a olygir gan 'hygyrchedd' yn rhywbeth sydd angen bod yn fwy manwl ynghylch beth ydy'ch cysyniad chi o hygyrchedd er mwyn mesur llwyddiant. Ydy'r gyfraith wedi dod yn fwy hygyrch ai peidio?
English: It is something that does need to be done. Now, the issue that I would have some questions and concerns about would be the fact that England and Wales law and Welsh law, as a distinct thing, don't always fit into tidy, separate niches. Tenants and landlords legislation is an example of that, perhaps. And the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016, when it is enacted, will be an example of law on landlords and tenants that dovetails with aspects of the Law of Property Act 1925, and therefore clarity as to whether it's this Bill or the Interpretation Act 1978 would be pertinent in that specific context, and therefore that's something that I do feel needs greater clarity in terms of the interrelations between the two pieces of legislation in very specific circumstances. It appears to be simple in the way the Bill sets it out, but I do think that there is greater complexity emerging than would perhaps appear on the face of that Bill.
Welsh: Mae o yn rhywbeth sydd angen ei wneud. Yr hyn y byddai gennyf i gwestiynau yn ei gylch a phryderon yn ei gylch fyddai'r ffaith bod cyfraith Cymru a Lloegr a chyfraith Cymru fel rhywbeth ar wahân - dydy o ddim bob amser yn ffitio i mewn i fylchau twt ar wahân. Mae cyfraith landlordiaid a thenantiaid yn enghraifft, efallai, o hynny. A bydd Deddf Rhentu Cartrefi (Cymru) 2016, pan ddaw o i rym, yn enghraifft o gyfraith ar landlordiaid a thenantiaid sydd yn cydblethu hefo agweddau, er enghraifft, o Ddeddf Cyfraith Eiddo 1925, ac felly mae'r eglurder ynghylch ai'r Bil yma yntau'r Interpretation Act 1978 fydd yn berthnasol yn y cyd-destun penodol. Felly, mae hynny'n rhywbeth, dwi'n teimlo, sydd angen mwy o eglurder yn ei gylch o - beth ydy'r rhyngberthynas rhwng y ddwy Ddeddf mewn amgylchiadau penodol? Mae o'n ymddangos yn syml yn y ffordd y mae'r Bil yn ei osod o allan, ond dwi'n meddwl bod yna fwy o gymlethdodau yn dod ohono fo na sy'n ymddangos ar wyneb y Bil hwn.
English: I think there's quite an apparent gap in the level of information in England as compared to the situation in Wales, so advice websites, gov.uk for example, the advice that people receive there, and can access from websites such as Citizens Advice and from student textbooks, for example, do focus quite clearly on:
Welsh: Dwi'n meddwl bod yna fwlch eithaf amlwg yn y lefel wybodaeth sydd yn Lloegr o gymharu efo beth sydd yng Nghymru. Felly, mae gwefannau cyngor gov.uk, er enghraifft, y cyngor mae pobl yn ei gael o fanno, y cyngor mae pobl yn ei gael o wefannau cynghori megis Citizens Advice, o werslyfrau i fyfyrwyr, er enghraifft, yn canolbwyntio yn eithaf amlwg ar
English: or they focus assuming that
Welsh: neu yn canolbwyntio gan gymryd,
English: without an apparent awareness that Welsh law and English law are separate and diverge in some areas. So, I would suggest as a starting point that websites such as www.gov.uk should make it clearer that
Welsh: heb ymwybyddiaeth bod cyfraith Cymru a chyfraith Lloegr yn bethau sydd ar wahân mewn rhai meysydd. Felly, byddwn i'n argymell fel man cychwyn fod gwefannau fel www.gov.uk yn gwneud yn fwy eglur,
English: and that there should be a link to the Assembly website on the same issues, because there is a tendency to focus on:
Welsh: a bod yna linc i wefan y Cynulliad ar yr un pwnc, achos mae yna dueddiad i ganolbwyntio: