English: Thank you for the series of questions. In terms of the new resource, it is a central resource. It's not about reallocating budgets that already existed within health boards, but there is something about how health boards use the resources they already have available to them as well. This isn't simply saying that extra capacity will only be provided by additional money from the centre, but the £15 million is money from the centre, and Members will recall that the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine expressed concerns about critical care capacity last year, and I asked the chief executive of NHS Wales to meet them, and that's helped to inform some of the work that we have actually undertaken since then, and members of the faculty have, of course, been involved in the task and finish group. And that comes back to the point you later made about north Wales. The additional capacity we're talking about - seven extra beds - comes from work streams that they've endorsed as well. That's the additional capacity that the finance should release, but it is on the basis that there are proper plans about how they'll do that, how they'll scale that up and make sure that the capacity is there to deliver. But that, in itself, as I've said in response to Angela Burns, must come together with more efficient use of resources and, in particular, as I said in my statement, delayed transfers of care, an area where we could make better use of what we already have as well as the additional capacity that we're looking to create. I think I dealt with the point about what will happen if people try to spend money in a different way. I've been clear that money can be clawed back in other areas. Health boards will be managed. In this area, it's a nationally directed programme, and I expect the money to be spent that way, and health boards won't be able to find a different way to spend money inappropriately. The set of recommendations are relatively tight and clear as to how money will be spent, so there aren't lots of opportunities for money to leak into other areas of the service. On your point about what will happen with recruitment activity, well, we actually have a good record through 'Train. Work. Live.', and it's come on the back of working with service areas, working with representative groups within that service area, about what is currently attractive for the way in which we deliver our service and what would make that service more attractive. And, actually, having a view on the longer term future for the service is something that staff should find attractive. And, of course, this is informed by the recommendations from a group of clinicians working in this service area at present who recognise the pressures that exist but also how there could be a better service to deliver both for our patients but also, of course, for our staff - a better place for them to do their job. And we have success in terms of psychiatry, GP training places, pharmacy, nurses and therapists in the 'Train. Work. Live.' programme, so we have got some reasons to be optimistic about our ability to do more in this area as well. I expect to have plans provided in the autumn, and I expect to see progress within the next 12 months or so. But some of this, as I see it, is about skilling up the staff we currently have as well as the additional staff we need to bring in to deliver the capacity that we want to deliver. So, I'm not going to pretend that this will be a quick fix. We do have clarity about how the money should be spent and the benefits that should be gained.
Welsh: Diolch am y gyfres o gwestiynau. O ran yr adnodd newydd, mae'n adnodd canolog. Nid yw'n ymwneud ag ailddyrannu cyllidebau a oedd eisoes yn bodoli o fewn byrddau iechyd, ond mae yna rywbeth ynghylch sut mae byrddau iechyd yn defnyddio'r adnoddau sydd eisoes ar gael iddyn nhw hefyd. Nid dim ond dweud y bydd capasiti ychwanegol yn cael ei ddarparu drwy arian ychwanegol o'r ganolfan yn unig yw hyn, ond arian o'r canol yw'r £15 miliwn a bydd yr Aelodau yn cofio i'r Gyfadran Meddygaeth Gofal Dwys fynegi pryderon ynghylch capasiti gofal critigol y llynedd, a gofynnais i brif weithredwr GIG Cymru gwrdd â nhw, ac mae hynny wedi helpu i lywio rhywfaint o'r gwaith yr ydym ni wedi'i wneud ers hynny, ac mae aelodau'r gyfadran, wrth gwrs, wedi bod yn rhan o'r grŵp gorchwyl a gorffen. Ac mae hynny'n dod yn ôl at y sylw a wnaethoch chi yn ddiweddarach am y gogledd. Daw'r capasiti ychwanegol yr ydym ni'n sôn amdano - saith gwely ychwanegol - o ffrydiau gwaith y maen nhw wedi'u cymeradwyo hefyd. Dyna'r capasiti ychwanegol y dylai'r cyllid ei ryddhau, ond ar y sail bod cynlluniau priodol ynglŷn â sut y byddant yn gwneud hynny, sut y byddant yn gwneud hynny a sicrhau bod y capasiti ar gael i gyflawni. Ond, fel y dywedais mewn ymateb i Angela Burns, mae'n rhaid cyfuno hynny gyda defnydd mwy effeithlon o adnoddau ac, yn arbennig, fel y dywedais yn fy natganiad, oedi wrth drosglwyddo gofal, maes lle y gallem ni wneud gwell defnydd o'r hyn sydd gennym ni eisoes yn ogystal â'r capasiti ychwanegol yr ydym ni'n gobeithio ei greu. Rwy'n credu fy mod i wedi ymdrin â'r sylw am yr hyn fydd yn digwydd os bydd pobl yn ceisio gwario arian mewn ffordd wahanol. Rwyf wedi bod yn glir y gellir cymryd yr arian yn ôl mewn meysydd eraill. Caiff byrddau iechyd eu rheoli. Yn y maes hwn, mae'n rhaglen a gyfarwyddir yn genedlaethol, ac rwy'n disgwyl i'r arian gael ei wario yn y ffordd honno, ac ni fydd byrddau iechyd yn gallu dod o hyd i ffordd wahanol o wario arian yn amhriodol. Mae'r argymhellion yn gymharol dynn a chlir o ran sut y caiff arian ei wario, ac felly nid oes llawer o gyfleoedd i ddefnyddio'r arian mewn meysydd eraill o'r gwasanaeth. O ran eich sylw am yr hyn a fydd yn digwydd gyda gweithgarwch recriwtio, wel, mae gennym ni hanes da drwy 'Hyfforddi. Gweithio. Byw.', ac mae hynny'n seiliedig ar weithio gyda meysydd gwasanaeth, gan weithio gyda grwpiau cynrychioliadol o fewn y maes gwasanaeth hwnnw, ynglŷn â'r hyn sy'n ddeniadol ar hyn o bryd o ran y ffordd yr ydym ni'n darparu ein gwasanaeth a'r hyn a fyddai'n gwneud y gwasanaeth hwnnw'n fwy deniadol. Ac, mewn gwirionedd, mae gallu rhoi barn am ddyfodol y gwasanaeth yn y tymor hir yn rhywbeth y dylai'r staff ei gael yn atyniadol. Ac, wrth gwrs, yn gefndir i hyn mae argymhellion grŵp o glinigwyr sy'n gweithio yn y maes gwasanaeth hwn ar hyn o bryd sy'n cydnabod y pwysau sy'n bodoli ond hefyd sut y gellid cael gwell gwasanaeth i gyflawni ar gyfer ein cleifion ond hefyd, wrth gwrs, ar gyfer ein staff - lle gwell iddyn nhw wneud eu gwaith. Ac rydym ni'n cael llwyddiant o ran seiciatreg, lleoedd hyfforddi meddygon teulu, fferylliaeth, nyrsys a therapyddion yn y rhaglen 'Hyfforddi. Gweithio. Byw.', felly mae gennym ni resymau dros fod yn gadarnhaol ynghylch ein gallu i wneud mwy yn y maes hwn hefyd. Disgwyliaf y darperir cynlluniau yn yr hydref, a disgwyliaf weld cynnydd o fewn y 12 mis nesaf fwy neu lai. Ond mae rhywfaint o hyn, yn fy marn i, yn ymwneud â gwella sgiliau'r staff sydd gennym ni ar hyn o bryd, yn ogystal â'r staff ychwanegol y mae angen inni eu cael i gyflawni'r capasiti yr ydym ni eisiau ei ddarparu. Felly, dydw i ddim yn mynd i gymryd arnaf y bydd hwn yn ateb cyflym. Mae gennym ni eglurder ynghylch sut y dylid gwario'r arian a'r manteision y dylid eu cael.