English: I very much welcome the Minister's statement. Homelessness is complicated and is caused by a number of different events. A job loss coinciding with splitting up with a partner can quite easily make somebody homeless who never thought that was ever likely to happen to them. Whilst people often equate homelessness with rough-sleeping, many more homeless people sleep on sofas and floors of friends and family or are in temporary accommodation. The most important thing - and I agree with the Minister - is to stop people becoming homeless in the first place by early intervention - prevention, an emergency response and housing, accommodation and support, then the provision of housing and ongoing support as a means of moving people out of homelessness. For some homeless people, providing a house or flat will not solve their problems. Their problems are far greater than that, and all you're doing is putting them up to fail. You move them into a house or a flat that they're unable to cope with. I feel what the Minister said about 18-year-olds; at 18, I was not capable of looking after myself in any way whatsoever, and I think that to send them out, give them a flat and wish them luck is always going to end, or in very many cases, with a lot of failure. I think I'd like to add that there's good work done by charities such as the Wallich, including their cross-border women's project in Birchgrove, Swansea. But does the Minister agree that, until we start building more council houses, get empty houses back into use and until the supply of housing meets housing demand, then we are always going to have some form of homelessness, because what we've got is out of kilter at the moment? There is far more demand than there is supply. I know the Government puts money into the demand side of housing, but if we could put more money into the supply side so that we actually get sufficient housing, we could end up in a virtuous circle, rather than the vicious one we're in now.
Welsh: Rwy'n croesawu'n fawr ddatganiad y Gweinidog. Mae digartrefedd yn fater cymhleth sy'n cael ei achosi gan nifer o wahanol ddigwyddiadau. Gall colli swydd, sy'n cyd-ddigwydd â pherthynas yn dod i ben, olygu bod rhywun yn cael ei hun yn ddigartref nad oedd erioed wedi ystyried y byddai hynny'n digwydd iddo ef. Er bod pobl yn aml yn cysylltu digartrefedd â chysgu ar y stryd, mae llawer mwy o bobl ddigartref yn cysgu ar soffas a lloriau ffrindiau a theulu neu mewn llety dros dro. Y peth pwysicaf - ac rwy'n cytuno â'r Gweinidog - yw atal pobl rhag bod yn ddigartref yn y lle cyntaf drwy ymyrryd yn gynnar - ataliad, ymateb brys a thai, llety a chymorth, ac yna darparu tai a chymorth parhaus fel ffordd o symud pobl allan o ddigartrefedd. I rai pobl ddigartref, ni fydd darparu tŷ neu fflat yn datrys eu problemau. Mae eu problemau nhw'n fwy o lawer na hynny, a'r cyfan a wnewch yw eu paratoi ar gyfer methiant. Rydych yn eu rhoi mewn tŷ neu fflat nad ydyn nhw'n gallu ymdopi ag ef. Rwy'n cytuno â'r hyn a ddywedodd y Gweinidog am bobl 18 mlwydd oed; yn 18 oed, nid oeddwn i'n gallu edrych ar ôl fy hun mewn plwc iddyn nhw yn mynd i arwain bob amser, neu mewn llawer iawn o achosion, at lawer o fethiant. Hoffwn i ychwanegu fod yna waith da yn cael ei wneud gan elusennau fel y Wallich, gan gynnwys eu prosiect trawsffiniol nhw ar gyfer menywod yn Birchgrove, Abertawe. Ond a fyddai'r Gweinidog yn cytuno, hyd nes y dechreuwn ni adeiladu mwy o dai cyngor a defnyddio tai gwag unwaith eto, a hyd nes y bydd y cyflenwad o dai yn bodloni'r galw am dai, yna bydd gyda ni bob amser ryw fath o ddigartrefedd, oherwydd mae'r hyn sydd gennym ni'n anghydnaws â'r sefyllfa ar hyn o bryd? Mae llawer mwy o alw nag o gyflenwad. Gwn fod y Llywodraeth yn rhoi arian i mewn o ran y galw am dai, ond pe gallem roi mwy o arian i mewn o ran y cyflenwi fel bod gennym ddigon o dai mewn gwirionedd, yn y pen draw gallai hynny arwain at gylch rhinweddol, yn hytrach na'r cylch dieflig yr ydym ynddo ar hyn o bryd.