English: I thank the Member for that further supplementary. To claim that the voice of the devolved Governments has had a substantive impact in shaping the negotiating mandate is, frankly, a ludicrous claim. As I mentioned in my earlier answer, we have taken every opportunity to make the case on behalf of Wales. In addition to the negotiating priorities, which we published in January, based on the political declaration following the announcement of the negotiating objectives, the First Minister wrote to the Prime Minister outlining in more detail some of our priorities. Following receipt of the draft mandate, I wrote to the UK Government setting out a number of detailed points that needed to be addressed. For example, in the context of the section dealing with technical barriers to trade, I pressed for recognition specifically of the needs of the aerospace sector. In the section dealing with sanitary and phytosanitary measures, I asked for specific priority to be given to sectors in Wales impacted by those measures, including shellfish, beef, lamb, and the dairy sector. He will not find those references that I pressed for in the final mandate. On the morning that the UK Cabinet was meeting to discuss and finalise the mandate, I had a telephone call with Michael Gove where I discussed the concerns that I had raised in my letter, and in that call I received no assurances that the UK Government was willing to change their negotiating approach in response to comments from any of the devolved Governments, and they failed to point to any changes in the mandate that reflected things that we had pressed for. So, it's clear in that final text that the UK Government has chosen not to take account of the legitimate interests of this Senedd and the Welsh Government's case.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn atodol pellach hwnnw. Mae honni bod llais y Llywodraethau datganoledig wedi cael effaith sylweddol ar lunio'r mandad negodi yn chwerthinllyd, a bod yn onest. Fel y crybwyllais yn fy ateb cynharach, rydym wedi manteisio ar bob cyfle i gyflwyno'r achos ar ran Cymru. Yn ogystal â'r blaenoriaethau negodi, a gyhoeddwyd gennym ym mis Ionawr, ar sail y datganiad gwleidyddol yn dilyn cyhoeddi'r amcanion negodi, ysgrifennodd y Prif Weinidog at Brif Weinidog y DU i amlinellu rhai o'n blaenoriaethau'n fanylach. Ar ôl derbyn y mandad drafft, ysgrifennais at Lywodraeth y DU gan nodi nifer o bwyntiau manwl roedd angen rhoi sylw iddynt. Er enghraifft, yng nghyd-destun yr adran sy'n ymdrin â rhwystrau technegol i fasnachu, pwysleisiais yr angen i gydnabod anghenion y sector awyrofod yn benodol. Yn yr adran sy'n ymdrin â mesurau i sicrhau iechyd pobl, anifeiliaid a phlanhigion, gofynnais am flaenoriaeth benodol i sectorau yng Nghymru y mae'r mesurau hynny'n effeithio arnynt, gan gynnwys pysgod cregyn, cig eidion, cig oen, a'r sector llaeth. Ni ddaw o hyd i'r cyfeiriadau hynny y bûm yn pwyso amdanynt yn y mandad terfynol. Ar y bore roedd Cabinet y DU yn cyfarfod i drafod a chwblhau'r mandad, cefais alwad ffôn gyda Michael Gove lle trafodais y pryderon roeddwn wedi'u codi yn fy llythyr, ac yn yr alwad honno ni chefais unrhyw sicrwydd fod Llywodraeth y DU yn fodlon newid eu dull negodi mewn ymateb i sylwadau gan unrhyw un o'r Llywodraethau datganoledig, ac ni allent bwyntio at unrhyw newidiadau yn y mandad a oedd yn adlewyrchu pethau roeddem wedi pwyso amdanynt. Felly, mae'n amlwg yn y testun terfynol hwnnw fod Llywodraeth y DU wedi dewis peidio ag ystyried buddiannau cyfreithlon y Senedd hon ac achos Llywodraeth Cymru.