English: Thank you for the statement, Minister. It is true that the reports of the war in Ukraine and the intensification in terms of tactics and the inhuman response of Russia are very concerning to those people who have sought shelter in Wales, and likely, of course, to have an impact on the number of refugees. The changes that you've mentioned in terms of the support available to the people sponsored by Welsh Government, who, of course, left everything behind, who've experienced trauma and loss, do cause some concern. While recognising that we need to encourage people to move on, to integrate into society and to pay their way wherever possible, we should do that as quickly as is appropriate, rather than as quickly as possible. So, what's the voice of the refugee here? Who decides which costs are to be paid, and what are the criteria for that? Would a taper of some sort in terms of the support available from Government be appropriate if people are earning a salary or receiving universal credit, for example? Since the Minister presented her latest update on Ukraine, more and more third sector organisations are very concerned about the very real threat of homelessness facing refugees from Ukraine. According to a report in The Guardian, up to 50,000 Ukrainian refugees across the UK could be homeless next year. Already since February, we know that 1,335 Ukrainian households, including 945 with children, have registered as homeless. So, Minister, is now the right time to be making this change, given that we are facing the hardest winter for decades and with the harsh winds of the economic storm particularly threatening those who've had to flee, leaving everything behind in their home country?
Welsh: Diolch am y datganiad, Weinidog. Mae'n wir bod yr adroddiadau am y rhyfela yn Wcráin a'r dwysáu sydd o ran tactegau ac agwedd cwbl annynol Rwsia yn peri gofid ofnadwy i'r bobl sydd wedi cael lloches yng Nghymru, ac yn debyg, wrth gwrs, o gael effaith ar y niferoedd o ffoaduriaid. Mae'r newidiadau rŷch chi wedi sôn amdanyn nhw o ran y gefnogaeth fydd ar gael i bobl dan nawdd Llywodraeth Cymru, sydd, wrth gwrs, wedi gorfod gadael popeth, wedi profi trawma a cholled, yn peri peth pryder. Tra'n cydnabod bod angen annog pobl i symud ymlaen, integreiddio i gymdeithas a thalu eu ffordd ble'n bosib, oni ddylid gwneud hynny mor gyflym â sy'n briodol yn hytrach na mor gyflym â phosib? Felly, beth yw llais y ffoadur yn hyn? Pwy sy'n penderfynu pa gostau sy'n cael eu talu a beth yw'r meini prawf? A fyddai tapr o ryw fath o ran y cymorth sydd ar gael gan y Llywodraeth yn briodol os yw pobl yn ennill cyflog neu o ran eu taliadau credyd cynhwysol? Ers i'r Gweinidog gyflwyno ei diweddariad diwethaf ar Wcráin, mae mwy a mwy o sefydliadau'r trydydd sector yn pryderu am y bygythiad gwirioneddol o ddigartrefedd sy'n wynebu ffoaduriaid o Wcráin. Yn ôl adroddiad yn The Guardian, gallai 50,000 o ffoaduriaid o Wcráin ledled y Deyrnas Gyfunol fod yn ddigartref y flwyddyn nesaf. Eisoes ers mis Chwefror rydym ni'n gwybod bod 1,335 o aelwydydd o Wcráin, gan gynnwys 945 â phlant, wedi eu cofrestru'n ddigartref. Felly, Weinidog, a yw hi'n adeg ddoeth i wneud y newid yma nawr a ninnau yn wynebu'r gaeaf caletaf ers degawdau a gwyntoedd main y storm economaidd yn arbennig o fygythiol i'r rhai sydd wedi gorfod ffoi, gan adael popeth ar ôl yn eu mamwlad?