techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: An important question, and one that deserves a detailed answer, if I may, Llywydd. I can say that health boards in Wales are able to offer multiparametric scans, in line with the current guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. That guidance currently recommends the mpMRI for people with a negative biopsy, to determine whether another biopsy is needed, and whether the management of a proven cancer will benefit from staging of the tumour. The what's called 'PROMIS trial' indicated that people with suspected prostate cancer might benefit from having their mpMRI prior to biopsy. NICE is reviewing its guidance and is expected to issue recommendations in the early part of next year. In the meantime, evidence is being considered by the Wales urology board. It's fair to say there are different views among the clinicians about the implications of recent evidence, with some health boards implementing elements of a revised approach. What I can say is that, if NICE recommends pre-biopsy mpMRI for suspected prostate cancer, then we would expect all health boards to amend their care pathways accordingly. In the meantime, health boards will continue to consider the evidence and pathway reforms through the Wales urology board.
Welsh: Cwestiwn pwysig, ac un sy'n haeddu ateb manwl, os caf i, Llywydd. Gallaf ddweud bod byrddau iechyd yng Nghymru yn gallu cynnig sganiau amlbaramedrig, yn unol â chanllawiau cyfredol gan y Sefydliad Cenedlaethol dros Ragoriaeth mewn Iechyd a Gofal. Mae'r canllawiau hynny ar hyn o bryd yn argymell yr mpMRI ar gyfer pobl â biopsi negyddol, i benderfynu a oes angen biopsi arall, a pha un a fydd rheoli canser profedig yn elwa ar fynd i'r afael â'r tiwmor mewn camau. Dynododd yr hyn a elwir yn 'dreial PROMIS' y gallai pobl â chanser y prostad tybiedig elwa ar gael eu mpMRI cyn biopsi. Mae NICE yn adolygu ei ganllawiau a disgwylir iddo gyhoeddi argymhellion yn ystod rhan gynnar y flwyddyn nesaf. Yn y cyfamser, mae tystiolaeth yn cael ei hystyried gan fwrdd wroleg Cymru. Mae'n deg i ddweud bod gwahanol safbwyntiau ymhlith y clinigwyr ynghylch goblygiadau tystiolaeth ddiweddar, gyda rhai byrddau iechyd yn gweithredu elfennau dull diwygiedig. Yr hyn y gallaf ei ddweud, os bydd NICE yn argymell mpMRI cyn-biopsi ar gyfer canser y prostad tybiedig, yna byddem yn disgwyl i bob bwrdd iechyd ddiwygio eu llwybrau gofal yn unol â hynny. Yn y cyfamser, bydd byrddau iechyd yn parhau i ystyried y dystiolaeth a diwygiadau i lwybrau trwy fwrdd wroleg Cymru.
English: I thank you for that detailed answer, First Minister. Regrettably, 10,000 men a year die from prostate cancer - it's the biggest killer of men. And some universality around the screening programme must be a compunction on the Government because, actually, cancer doesn't rely on postcodes - it's universal, it is. On the bowel cancer screening programme that the Welsh Government have, it has been called, at the moment, a very postcode lottery-driven screening programme. In particular, one in four individuals were waiting in excess of eight weeks to have their screening procedure diagnosed, and actually put into practice if intervention was required. Nine hundred people a year die of bowel cancer here in Wales. If, ultimately, we had a better, more robust screening system and a wider screening system that actually took into account 40 years and above, then we could drive those numbers down even further. Given that we know the importance of screening and, in particular, bowel screening, what action is your Government taking to shorten the waiting times that will remove that one in four - 25 per cent of people - waiting in excess of eight weeks to get the results that they require, because it cannot be right that, where the condition is treatable, just waiting too long on a waiting list has a detrimental impact on your outcome?
Welsh: Diolchaf i chi am yr ateb manwl yna, Prif Weinidog. Yn anffodus, mae 10,000 o ddynion y flwyddyn yn marw o ganser y prostad - dyma'r lladdwr mwyaf ar ddynion. Ac mae'n rhaid i rywfaint o gyffredinolrwydd o ran y rhaglen sgrinio fod yn ddyletswydd ar y Llywodraeth oherwydd, mewn gwirionedd, nid yw canser yn dibynnu ar godau post - mae'n gyffredinol. O ran y rhaglen sgrinio canser y coluddyn sydd gan Lywodraeth Cymru, fe'i galwyd, ar hyn o bryd, yn rhaglen sgrinio sydd wedi ei seilio'n fawr ar loteri cod post. Yn benodol, roedd un o bob pedwar o unigolion yn aros mwy nag wyth wythnos i gael diagnosis o'u triniaeth sgrinio, a chael ei rhoi ar waith pe byddai angen ymyrraeth. Mae naw cant o bobl y flwyddyn yn marw o ganser y coluddyn yma yng Nghymru. Pe byddai gennym ni, yn y pen draw, system sgrinio well, fwy cadarn a system sgrinio ehangach a fyddai'n cymryd 40 oed a hŷn i ystyriaeth, yna gallem ni ostwng y niferoedd hynny hyd yn oed ymhellach. O gofio ein bod ni'n ymwybodol o bwysigrwydd sgrinio ac, yn enwedig, sgrinio'r coluddyn, pa gamau mae eich Llywodraeth yn eu cymryd i gwtogi amseroedd aros a fydd yn cael gwared ar yr un o bob pedwar - 25 y cant o bobl - sy'n aros dros wyth wythnos i gael y canlyniadau sydd eu hangen arnynt, oherwydd ni all fod yn iawn, pan fo modd trin y cyflwr, bod dim ond aros yn rhy hir ar restr aros yn cael effaith niweidiol ar eich canlyniad?
English: With screening, it's a question of who you target for the screening, because you can't screen everybody. Which elements of the population are particularly susceptible to a particular type of cancer, because it's not physically possible to screen everybody? We want, of course, to see consistency across the health boards. They're able to access the new treatments fund, if that's appropriate for what they wish to take forward. What I can say is that, when we look at our urgent suspected cancer route, for example, the vast majority of people started definitive treatment within the target time of 62 days - 88.7 per cent - and 96 per cent of patients who are newly diagnosed with cancer not via the urgent route started definitive treatment within the target time of 31 days, in March 2018. So, the vast majority of people do get the treatment that they should get within the right amount of time. But, of course, we rely on specialists in order to advise us to make sure that we can see how we can improve screening where that's necessary.
Welsh: O ran sgrinio, mae'n gwestiwn o bwy ydych chi'n eu targedu ar gyfer y sgrinio, oherwydd ni allwch chi sgrinio pawb. Pa elfennau o'r boblogaeth sy'n arbennig o agored i fath penodol o ganser, oherwydd nid yw'n gorfforol bosibl i sgrinio pawb? Rydym ni eisiau, wrth gwrs, gweld cysondeb ar draws y byrddau iechyd. Maen nhw'n gallu cael mynediad at y gronfa triniaethau newydd, os yw hynny'n briodol ar gyfer yr hyn y maen nhw'n dymuno bwrw ymlaen ag ef. Yr hyn y gallaf ei ddweud, pan edrychwn ni ar ein llwybr canser tybiedig brys, er enghraifft, yw bod y mwyafrif llethol o bobl wedi dechrau triniaeth ddiffiniol yn unol â'r amser targed o 62 diwrnod - 88.7 y cant - a dechreuodd 96 y cant o gleifion sydd newydd gael diagnosis o ganser heb ddilyn y llwybr brys driniaeth ddiffiniol yn unol â'r amser targed o 31 diwrnod ym mis Mawrth 2018. Felly, mae'r mwyafrif llethol o bobl yn cael y driniaeth y dylent ei chael o fewn y cyfnod priodol o amser. Ond, wrth gwrs, rydym ni'n dibynnu ar arbenigwyr i'n cynghori ni i wneud yn siŵr y gallwn ni weld sut y gallwn ni wella sgrinio pan fo hynny'n angenrheidiol.
English: Those improvements are desperately needed. As I said, Bowel Cancer UK says it is a national crisis that one in four people are waiting eight weeks or more for that screening process to be undertaken. But what we do know from the weekend's announcement that the UK Government made is that there will be a considerable uplift in the spend available to the Welsh Government to spend on health and social care here in Wales - [ Interruption. ] These screening - . Well, I can hear the chuntering from the Labour backbenchers, but the reality is that money is coming over to the Welsh Government. Now, it is perfectly right, under the devolved settlement, that you choose where to spend that money. From these benches, we believe that that money should be spent in the fields of health and social care to make those improvements in prostate, bowel and other treatments available to patients here in Wales. Now, will you commit today to making sure that any money that is made available to the Welsh Government is spent on those key areas, so that we can see the improvements that we desperately need in diagnostic tests, waiting times and staff recruitment, which other parts of the UK that are committed to delivering it in the health and social care budgets will see? We need that commitment, First Minister. Will you make it?
Welsh: Mae angen y gwelliannau hynny'n daer. Fel y dywedais, mae Bowel Cancer UK yn dweud ei fod yn argyfwng cenedlaethol bod un o bob pedwar o bobl yn aros wyth wythnos neu fwy i'r broses sgrinio honno gael ei chynnal. Ond yr hyn yr ydym ni'n ei wybod o gyhoeddiad y penwythnos y mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi ei wneud yw y bydd cynnydd sylweddol i'r gwariant sydd ar gael i Lywodraeth Cymru ei wario ar iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol yma yng Nghymru - [ Torri ar draws. ] Mae'r sgrinio - . Wel, gallaf glywed y grwgnach gan Aelodau meinciau cefn Llafur, ond y gwir yw bod arian yn dod draw i Lywodraeth Cymru. Nawr, mae'n berffaith iawn, o dan y setliad datganoledig, eich bod chi'n dewis ble i wario'r arian hwnnw. O'r meinciau hyn, rydym ni'n credu y dylid gwario'r arian hwnnw ym meysydd iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol i wneud y gwelliannau hynny o ran y prostad, y coluddyn a thriniaethau eraill sydd ar gael i gleifion yma yng Nghymru. Nawr, a wnewch chi ymrwymo heddiw i wneud yn siŵr bod unrhyw arian sydd ar gael i Lywodraeth Cymru yn cael ei wario ar y meysydd allweddol hynny, fel y gallwn ni weld y gwelliannau sydd eu hangen arnom ni'n daer i brofion diagnostig, amseroedd aros a recriwtio staff, y bydd rhannau eraill o'r DU sydd wedi ymrwymo i'w darparu yn y cyllidebau iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol yn eu gweld? Mae angen yr ymrwymiad hwnnw arnom ni, Prif Weinidog. A wnewch chi hynny?
English: Well, the first thing we have to see is how much money we'll actually get, because there are two important points to make here: first of all, we have been informed that that money, whatever money we get, will be the source of funding to deal with pay increases. So, the lifting of the pay cap will have to be financed through any money that we get via the source that he has mentioned. So, that's the first thing to mention. There's no extra money on top of that. Secondly, of course, it's never the case, is it, that we get a lump sum of money to pay for a particular area, such as health or education? What happens is, of course, as he knows, is that it's delivered via the block grant. What we don't know is that, if we get the increase in health, whether we will then see decreases everywhere else - in local government, in education, in all those areas that are devolved. Now, those, of course, are removed from the figure that he's just mentioned. So, until we know firstly how much money net there will actually be - we know about the £1.2 billion - and until we know, of course, how much money - we've got a fair idea - that the pay deal will cost, we won't know how much money is available to spend. Until those factors are resolved - and nobody is able to do that yet because we don't know what any increases or not in our block grant will be in the autumn - and until we know the definitive net sum of money, it's very difficult to make any commitments at this stage.
Welsh: Wel, y peth cyntaf y mae'n rhaid i ni ei weld yw faint o arian y byddwn ni'n ei gael mewn gwirionedd, oherwydd mae dau bwynt pwysig i'w gwneud yma: yn gyntaf oll, rydym ni wedi cael ein hysbysu mai'r arian hwnnw, pa bynnag arian y byddwn ni'n ei gael, fydd y ffynhonnell o gyllid i ymdrin â chodiadau cyflog. Felly, bydd yn rhaid ariannu'r cam o godi'r cap cyflog trwy unrhyw arian a gawn ni drwy'r ffynhonnell y mae ef wedi cyfeirio ati. Felly, dyna'r peth cyntaf i'w grybwyll. Nid oes unrhyw arian ychwanegol ar ben hynny. Yn ail, wrth gwrs, nid yw'n wir byth, ydy hi, ein bod ni'n cael cyfandaliad o arian i dalu am faes penodol, fel iechyd neu addysg? Yr hyn sy'n digwydd, wrth gwrs, fel y mae e'n gwybod, yw ei fod yn cael ei ddarparu drwy'r grant bloc. Yr hyn nad ydym ni'n ei wybod, os byddwn ni'n cael y cynnydd ym maes iechyd, pa un a fyddwn ni'n gweld gostyngiadau ym mhobman arall wedyn - mewn llywodraeth leol, mewn addysg, yn yr holl feysydd hynny sydd wedi'u datganoli. Nawr, mae'r rheini, wrth gwrs, yn cael eu tynnu o'r ffigur y mae newydd eu crybwyll. Felly, tan y byddwn ni'n gwybod yn gyntaf faint o arian net fydd yna mewn gwirionedd - rydym ni'n gwybod am yr £1.2 biliwn - a tan y byddwn ni'n gwybod, wrth gwrs, faint o arian - mae gennym ni syniad go lew - y bydd y cytundeb cyflogau yn ei gostio, ni fyddwn yn gwybod faint o arian sydd ar gael i'w wario. Tan i'r ffactorau hynny gael eu datrys - ac nid oes neb yn gallu gwneud hynny eto oherwydd nid ydym ni'n gwybod pa gynnydd neu beidio fydd yn ein bloc grant yn yr Hydref - a tan y byddwn ni'n gwybod y swm terfynol net o arian, mae'n anodd iawn gwneud unrhyw ymrwymiadau ar hyn o bryd.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. First Minister, the Prime Minister announced over the weekend that there would be a £20 billion a year birthday present for the NHS in England. As a result of Barnett, Wales is expected to receive £1.2 billion. On Sunday, a Welsh Government spokesman said that a decision on the allocation of funding would be made by your Cabinet in the usual way. So, First Minister, have you made that decision yet, and will you be using any extra moneys we receive for health and social care?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, cyhoeddodd Prif Weinidog y DU dros y penwythnos y byddai anrheg pen-blwydd o £20 biliwn y flwyddyn i'r GIG yn Lloegr. O ganlyniad i Barnett, disgwylir i Gymru gael £1.2 biliwn. Ddydd Sul, dywedodd llefarydd Llywodraeth Cymru y byddai penderfyniad ar ddyraniad cyllid yn cael ei wneud gan eich Cabinet chi yn y ffordd arferol. Felly, Prif Weinidog, a ydych chi wedi gwneud y penderfyniad hwnnw eto, ac a fyddwch chi'n defnyddio unrhyw arian ychwanegol y byddwn ni'n ei gael ar gyfer iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol?
English: Well, the only commitment that we have made is that we will lift the pay cap - unusually, because normally we don't make those promises before we know how much money is allocated. So, that will have to be paid for from whichever sum of money we get from the UK Government; there's no extra money for it. And as I said in the answer earlier on, it's not going to be £1.2 billion. We don't know whether there'll be cuts elsewhere that will bring that figure down. Until we know what the final figure is, it's very difficult to give any commitments in terms of spending.
Welsh: Wel, yr unig ymrwymiad yr ydym ni wedi ei wneud yw y byddwn ni'n codi'r cap cyflog - yn anarferol, oherwydd nid ydym ni'n gwneud yr addewidion hynny cyn ein bod ni'n gwybod faint o arian sydd wedi ei ddyrannu, fel rheol. Felly, bydd yn rhaid talu am hynny o ba bynnag swm o arian y byddwn ni'n ei gael gan Lywodraeth y DU; nid oes unrhyw arian ychwanegol ar ei gyfer. Ac fel y dywedais yn yr ateb yn gynharach, nid yw'n mynd i fod yn £1.2 biliwn. Nid ydym ni'n gwybod pa un a fydd toriadau yn rhywle arall a fydd yn gostwng y ffigur hwnnw. Tan y byddwn ni'n gwybod beth yw'r ffigur terfynol, mae'n anodd iawn gwneud unrhyw ymrwymiadau o ran gwariant.
English: Thank you for that answer. My concern here is that mental health issues account for around a quarter of all health problems, yet we're spending as little as over 11 per cent of the entire NHS Wales budget. We have seen a 100 per cent increase in demand for child and adolescent mental health care services. We know that depression affects 22 per cent of men and 28 per cent of women over the age of 65. We've seen a large rise in instances of self-harm, and each year around 300 people in Wales die from suicide - this is about twice the number of people killed in road accidents. We are clearly not doing enough to tackle mental health in Wales. So, First Minister, will you commit to using some of this additional money, whatever it may be, coming to Wales in order to ensure that mental health funding is based upon a robust assessment of healthcare needs?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb yna. Fy mhryder yn y fan yma yw bod problemau iechyd meddwl yn cynrychioli tua chwarter yr holl broblemau iechyd, ac eto rydym ni'n gwario cyn lleied â dros 11 y cant o gyllideb gyfan GIG Cymru. Rydym ni wedi gweld cynnydd o 100 y cant i'r galw am wasanaethau gofal iechyd meddwl plant a'r glasoed. Rydym ni'n gwybod bod iselder yn effeithio ar 22 y cant o ddynion a 28 y cant o fenywod dros 65 oed. Rydym ni wedi gweld cynnydd mawr i achosion o hunan-niwed, ac mae tua 300 o bobl yng Nghymru yn marw o ganlyniad i hunanladdiad bob blwyddyn - mae hyn tua dwywaith y nifer o bobl sy'n cael eu lladd mewn damweiniau ar y ffyrdd. Mae'n amlwg nad ydym ni'n gwneud digon i fynd i'r afael ag iechyd meddwl yng Nghymru. Felly, Prif Weinidog, a wnewch chi ymrwymo i ddefnyddio rhywfaint o'r arian ychwanegol hwn, beth bynnag y bydd, sy'n dod i Gymru i sicrhau bod cyllid iechyd meddwl yn seiliedig ar asesiad cadarn o anghenion gofal iechyd?
English: Yes, and in particular, of course, to look at prevention. That's hugely important. With CAMHS, she is right to say that there was a significant increase in demand for CAMHS and we met that demand by allocating - if I remember - £8 million a year towards CAMHS in order for them to meet the demand that was there. Mental health, as she will know, is a key priority for us in 'Prosperity for All'. We want to make sure that mental health is seen as something that is a priority for all governments in the future, and that will shape any spending decisions that we take if there's any extra money on the table.
Welsh: Gwnaf, ac yn arbennig, wrth gwrs, i edrych ar ei atal. Mae hynny'n bwysig iawn. Gyda CAMHS, mae'n iawn i ddweud y bu cynnydd sylweddol i'r galw am CAMHS a bodlonwyd y galw hwnnw gennym ni trwy ddyrannu - os cofiaf - £8 miliwn y flwyddyn tuag at CAMHS er mwyn iddyn nhw fodloni'r galw a oedd yno. Mae iechyd meddwl, fel y bydd yn gwybod, yn flaenoriaeth allweddol i ni yn 'Ffyniant i Bawb'. Rydym ni eisiau gwneud yn siŵr bod iechyd meddwl yn cael ei weld fel rhywbeth sy'n flaenoriaeth i bob llywodraeth yn y dyfodol, a bydd hynny'n llywio unrhyw benderfyniadau gwario yr ydym ni'n eu gwneud os oes unrhyw arian ychwanegol ar y bwrdd.
English: Thank you for that answer, First Minister. As I've highlighted before, many times, one in four of us will suffer from mental ill health. A friend or a work colleague could be battling depression for years - we wouldn't know about it, because, unfortunately, there is still a stigma attached to mental health issues. We all have to be more open about mental health: we wouldn't try to hide a broken leg, but we will try to hide depression. Sadly, as a result of stigma, many people end up taking their own lives. If we recognise the signs and offer non-judgmental support, many lives could be saved. So, First Minister, will you commit your Government to ensuring that as many people as possible are trained as mental health first aiders, and will you look at adding the training to the school curriculum and encourage large employers to have mental health first aiders alongside the normal, required first aiders? Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb yna, Prif Weinidog. Fel yr wyf i wedi ei amlygu o'r blaen, lawer gwaith, bydd un o bob pedwar ohonom ni'n dioddef o salwch meddwl. Gallai ffrind neu gydweithiwr fod wedi bod yn ymladd iselder ers blynyddoedd - ni fyddem ni'n gwybod am y peth, oherwydd, yn anffodus, mae stigma ynghlwm wrth broblemau iechyd meddwl o hyd. Mae'n rhaid i ni i gyd fod yn fwy agored am iechyd meddwl: ni fyddem ni'n ceisio cuddio coes sydd wedi torri, ond byddem yn ceisio cuddio iselder. Yn anffodus, o ganlyniad i stigma, mae llawer o bobl yn cymryd eu bywydau eu hunain yn y pen draw. Os byddwn ni'n cydnabod yr arwyddion ac yn cynnig cymorth anfeirniadol, gellid achub llawer o fywydau. Felly, Prif Weinidog, a wnewch chi ymrwymo eich Llywodraeth i sicrhau bod cynifer o bobl â phosibl yn cael eu hyfforddi fel swyddogion cymorth cyntaf iechyd meddwl, ac a wnewch chi ystyried ychwanegu'r hyfforddiant at y cwricwlwm ysgol ac annog cyflogwyr mawr i gael swyddogion cymorth cyntaf iechyd meddwl ochr yn ochr â'r swyddogion cymorth cyntaf arferol, gofynnol? Diolch.
English: I'm not sure that first aid is the way to deal with it. That suggests something that is acute, something that's just arisen. I think it's more long term than that. I take the point that the leader of UKIP is making in terms of how we deal with people who don't exhibit any external signs of depression. I've seen it at close hand, I've got a fair idea of how it operates in people, but it's not always obvious to those who are not familiar with the individual involved, and that is difficult, of course, because the external signs are not there. If you break a leg, it's obvious: the signs are there. That's why I want to make sure that when we look at mental health, we don't just look at it as a service designed to help people when they get into crisis, that we do look at ways in which we can help young people particularly - that's important, we have a counsellor in each secondary school in Wales - but at what more could be done, for example, to look to help people who are not obviously in need of help. They are the people, quite often, of course, that the system needs to identify. How that's done, of course, we will take forward with practitioners, to see how we can create a service where there is more focus on prevention and less on dealing with symptoms when they become obvious.
Welsh: Nid wyf i'n siŵr mai cymorth cyntaf yw'r ffordd i ymdrin ag ef. Mae hynny'n awgrymu rhywbeth sy'n acíwt, rhywbeth sydd newydd godi. Credaf ei fod yn fwy hirdymor na hynny. Derbyniaf y pwynt y mae arweinydd UKIP yn ei wneud o ran sut yr ydym ni'n ymdrin â phobl nad ydyn nhw'n dangos unrhyw arwyddion allanol o iselder. Rwyf i weld ei weld yn bersonol, mae gen i syniad go lew o sut y mae'n gweithredu mewn pobl, ond nid yw bob amser yn amlwg i'r rheini nad ydynt yn gyfarwydd â'r unigolyn dan sylw, ac mae'n anodd, wrth gwrs, oherwydd nid yw'r arwyddion allanol yno. Os byddwch chi'n torri coes, mae'n amlwg: mae'r arwyddion yno. Dyna pam yr wyf i eisiau gwneud yn siŵr pan fyddwn ni'n ystyried iechyd meddwl, nad ydym yn ei ystyried fel gwasanaeth sydd wedi ei gynllunio i helpu pobl dim ond pan fyddan nhw'n dioddef argyfwng, ein bod ni'n ystyried ffyrdd y gallwn ni helpu pobl ifanc yn arbennig - mae hynny'n bwysig, mae gennym ni gwnselydd ym mhob ysgol uwchradd yng Nghymru - ond beth arall y gellid ei wneud, er enghraifft, i geisio helpu pobl nad yw'n amlwg bod angen cymorth arnynt. Nhw yw'r bobl, yn aml iawn, wrth gwrs, y mae angen i'r systemau eu nodi. O ran sut y gwneir hynny, wrth gwrs, byddwn yn bwrw ymlaen â hynny gydag ymarferwyr, i weld sut y gallwn ni greu gwasanaeth lle ceir mwy o bwyslais ar atal a llai ar ymdrin â symptomau pan eu bod yn dod yn amlwg.
English: Well, we are looking at air quality and how to improve it. I'm not going to agree with a firm of lawyers, obviously, that are not Welsh Government lawyers, but there is a challenge, of course, to improve air quality in the future.
Welsh: Wel, rydym ni'n ystyried ansawdd aer a sut i'w wella. Nid wyf i'n mynd i gytuno gyda chwmni cyfreithwyr, yn amlwg, nad ydynt yn gyfreithwyr Llywodraeth Cymru, ond mae her, wrth gwrs, i wella ansawdd aer yn y dyfodol.