English: I'll just start with Llyr, if that's okay. Thank you very much for acknowledging, as we do, actually, as the Finance Committee, that, by working together, we're getting an increasingly transparent presentation of the budget that's possible. We're always happy to take recommendations on how to do that better. That might be something that Mike was referring to right at the end there, but I actually missed his last question - I'll come back to that. Yes, as I explained in my opening presentation, we've worked very hard here. We started from a zero-budget position to identify what we needed to spend money on, or what we thought that the next Commission would need to spend money on, and, as ever, a significant amount of our costs are pretty much - you know, we're already committed to them, leaving us with a minimum amount of discretion for where we can be innovative, if you like. The point about the windows, obviously we've flagged this up with you before, and you're quite right, Llyr, there's a feasibility study that's been done on this, but regrettably, the Commissioners themselves haven't seen that yet, and as soon as we have, then obviously we'll be in a position to make the suitable reports to the Finance Committee about what they say. You're right that it's a - . The feasibility study itself is not so expensive, but the overall costs will be. But I think it's worth us bearing in mind that this is not just about getting some new windows; this is, in no small part, to do with health and safety - some of these windows are verging on the dangerous. But also, we have a commitment, as a Senedd, to work towards our sustainability goals, and it's pretty clear that the windows that we have at the moment aren't helping us do that. So, there's more than one reason for changing the windows, if you like. However, it is going to be a big expense and your comments about whether this should receive public scrutiny have certainly been noted, and obviously we'll take that back to the Commission. The standards commissioner - yes, I think you were given apologies in the Finance Committee for that report not being ready, and we're grateful to you for acknowledging that it's effectively COVID priorities that have just bumped that down the list of things to do. But you'll definitely be receiving that. With the long-term savings, part of what we do, in presenting the budget, certainly at the beginning of a Commission, is to try and look across the five years, but certainly the three years, and give indicative figures of what we would expect next year's budget to look like. And in-built into that is a level of looking ahead to see what savings we can make, or, sadly, as is more frequently the case, what things might actually cost. But, for example - we've been in this cycle before - we're looking ahead at the moment to some contracts coming to an end, and whether whoever takes the new contract on, or even if it's the same individuals - to see if we can make savings there. I think you mentioned the voluntary exit scheme. I think we were pretty clear right at the beginning that that was about reshaping the workforce in order to respond to the challenges that the Commission now has, and that includes new skills being brought in. Some staff, of course, were able to be retained with different types of training. But in particular - I only mention this because you mentioned engagement a little bit later on - what that directorate now looks like and what it's trying to do is completely different from what we were doing before, and it needs the new skills to do that. All the directorates are aligned with the three strategic goals now, and they are of equal importance. I might have missed something here, so apologies if - . Oh, yes, the committees -
Welsh: Fe ddechreuaf gyda Llyr, os yw hynny'n iawn. Diolch yn fawr am gydnabod, fel y gwnawn ni, fel y mae'r Pwyllgor Cyllid yn ei wneud, ein bod, drwy gydweithio, yn cael cyflwyniad mor gynyddol dryloyw o'r gyllideb ag sy'n bosibl. Rydym bob amser yn hapus i gymryd argymhellion ar sut i wneud hynny'n well. Efallai fod hynny'n rhywbeth roedd Mike yn cyfeirio ato ar y diwedd, ond collais ei gwestiwn olaf mewn gwirionedd - dof yn ôl at hynny. Ie, fel yr eglurais yn fy nghyflwyniad agoriadol, rydym wedi gweithio'n galed iawn yma. Dechreuasom o ddim cyllideb i nodi'r hyn roedd angen inni wario arian arno, neu'r hyn roeddem yn credu y byddai angen i'r Comisiwn nesaf wario arian arno, ac fel arfer, mae swm sylweddol o'n costau'n eithaf - wyddoch chi, rydym eisoes wedi ymrwymo iddynt, gan ein gadael gydag isafswm o ddisgresiwn ynglŷn â lle gallwn fod yn arloesol, os mynnwch. Y pwynt am y ffenestri, mae'n amlwg ein bod wedi tynnu sylw at hyn gyda chi o'r blaen, ac rydych chi'n llygad eich lle, Llyr, mae astudiaeth ddichonoldeb wedi'i gwneud ar hyn, ond yn anffodus, nid yw'r Comisiynwyr eu hunain wedi gweld honno eto, a chyn gynted ag y byddwn wedi gwneud hynny, mae'n amlwg y byddwn mewn sefyllfa i wneud yr adroddiadau addas i'r Pwyllgor Cyllid ynglŷn â'r hyn a ddywedant. Rydych chi'n iawn ei fod - . Nid yw'r astudiaeth ddichonoldeb ei hun mor ddrud â hynny, ond fe fydd y costau cyffredinol. Ond rwy'n credu ei bod yn werth inni gofio nad yw hyn yn ymwneud â chael ffenestri newydd yn unig; mae hyn, i raddau helaeth, yn ymwneud ag iechyd a diogelwch - mae rhai o'r ffenestri yn ymylu ar fod yn beryglus. Ond hefyd, mae gennym ymrwymiad, fel Senedd, i weithio tuag at ein nodau cynaliadwyedd, ac mae'n eithaf clir nad yw'r ffenestri sydd gennym ar hyn o bryd yn ein helpu i wneud hynny. Felly, mae mwy nag un rheswm dros newid y ffenestri, os mynnwch. Fodd bynnag, bydd yn gost fawr ac mae eich sylwadau ynglŷn ag a ddylai'r cyhoedd allu craffu ar hyn yn sicr wedi'u nodi, ac mae'n amlwg y byddwn yn mynd â hynny'n ôl i'r Comisiwn. Y comisiynydd safonau - ie, credaf i chi gael ymddiheuriadau yn y Pwyllgor Cyllid am nad oedd yr adroddiad hwnnw'n barod, ac rydym yn ddiolchgar i chi am gydnabod mai blaenoriaethau COVID i bob pwrpas sydd wedi gwthio hynny i lawr y rhestr o bethau i'w gwneud. Ond byddwch yn sicr yn ei gael. Gyda'r arbedion hirdymor, rhan o'r hyn a wnawn wrth gyflwyno'r gyllideb, ar ddechrau Comisiwn yn sicr, yw ceisio edrych ar draws y pum mlynedd, ond yn sicr y tair blynedd, a rhoi ffigurau dangosol o'r hyn y byddem yn disgwyl i gyllideb y flwyddyn nesaf ei gynnwys. Ac yn rhan o hynny ceir lefel o edrych ymlaen i weld pa arbedion y gallwn eu gwneud, neu'n anffodus, fel sy'n digwydd yn amlach, beth yw cost pethau. Ond er enghraifft - rydym wedi bod yn y cylch hwn o'r blaen - rydym yn edrych ymlaen ar hyn o bryd at weld rhai contractau'n dod i ben, ac at weld pwy sy'n cael y contract newydd, neu hyd yn oed os mai'r un unigolion ydynt - i weld a allwn wneud arbedion yno. Credaf ichi sôn am y cynllun ymadael gwirfoddol. Rwy'n credu ein bod yn eithaf clir ar y dechrau fod hynny'n ymwneud ag ail-lunio'r gweithlu er mwyn ymateb i'r heriau sy'n wynebu'r Comisiwn nawr, ac mae hynny'n cynnwys cyflwyno sgiliau newydd. Roedd modd cadw rhai aelodau o staff, wrth gwrs, gyda gwahanol fathau o hyfforddiant. Ond yn fwy arbennig - nid wyf ond yn sôn am hyn oherwydd eich bod wedi sôn am ymgysylltu ychydig yn nes ymlaen - mae'r olwg sydd ar y gyfarwyddiaeth honno nawr a'r hyn y mae'n ceisio'i wneud yn gwbl wahanol i'r hyn roeddem yn ei wneud o'r blaen, ac mae angen y sgiliau newydd arni i wneud hynny. Mae pob cyfarwyddiaeth yn cyd-fynd â'r tri nod strategol nawr, ac maent yr un mor bwysig. Efallai fy mod wedi methu rhywbeth, felly ymddiheuriadau - . O, ie, y pwyllgorau -