English: Can I just say thank you for reassuring us that we're not back in the same position that we were in in 2016? I think the investment in the blast furnace and, actually, the company's interest in producing more of its own energy are a good sign that that's actually the case. I just had a couple of questions, because my colleague Russell has some as well. I suppose I'd like to repeat some of the questions that I asked when the merger or the joint venture was looking as if it was very probable. One of the things that I asked at the time then was: what's likely to be happening with R&D? I think you might have answered that in response to David Rees. At the time - I think it was in response to an emergency question or a topical question from Helen Mary - you said that you would be circulating a note of the conditionality of the terms that have been offered to Tata already. At the time, we were asking, 'Well, will they apply to a merged venture?' But, I don't think we've had that note yet, and I think that it would be useful, not least because it will stop us asking this same question over and over. On the principle that I'm asking the same questions that I would have asked if there had been a merger, you did say at the time that you were hoping that the employment pact would be extended to 2026 with the joint venture. If that doesn't happen, would you still be seeking that extension from Tata as it is - on the same terms, probably? You also mentioned the competitiveness of Welsh steel - that what we're looking for is something that's efficient and productive. I suppose that what I'm asking is, is there a plan B here? Say this merger doesn't go ahead, I think that what I'm seeking is that there has been some sort of reassurance about what would happen if it doesn't go ahead, in the sense of, are there any escrow agreements drawn up about an extension to an employability pact? Was there anything else that was done in draft, if you like, so that, should the merger not go ahead, we weren't immediately just thrown back into a position where we were all asking, 'What next?' Now, I appreciate that it is a bit too early to be asking that question, but I would have liked to be certain that there was a back-up plan. I suppose that's what I'm asking. I think that that's all I want to ask at this moment. I will be listening to what other Members say as well - particularly, I suspect that Trostre might come up in other people's questions as well.
Welsh: A gaf fi ddweud diolch am ein sicrhau nad ydym yn ôl yn yr un sefyllfa ag yr oeddem ynddi yn 2016? Rwy'n credu bod y buddsoddiad yn y ffwrnais chwyth a diddordeb y cwmni mewn cynhyrchu mwy o'i ynni ei hun yn arwydd da o hynny. Un neu ddau o gwestiynau'n unig oedd gennyf, oherwydd mae gan fy nghyd-Aelod Russell gwestiynau hefyd. Hoffwn ailadrodd rhai o'r cwestiynau a ofynnais pan oedd hi'n edrych yn debygol iawn y byddai'r uno neu'r gyd-fenter yn digwydd. Un o'r pethau a ofynnais ar y pryd oedd: beth sy'n debygol o ddigwydd o ran ymchwil a datblygu? Credaf efallai eich bod wedi ateb y cwestiwn hwnnw wrth ymateb i David Rees. Ar y pryd - rwy'n meddwl mai ymateb i gwestiwn brys neu gwestiwn amserol gan Helen Mary a wnaethoch - fe ddywedoch chi y byddech yn dosbarthu nodyn ynglŷn ag amodoldeb y telerau sydd wedi'u cynnig i Tata eisoes. Ar y pryd, roeddem yn gofyn, 'Wel, a fyddant yn gwneud cais i gael menter ar y cyd?' Ond nid wyf yn meddwl ein bod wedi cael y nodyn hwnnw eto, ac rwy'n meddwl y byddai'n ddefnyddiol, yn bennaf oherwydd y bydd yn ein hatal rhag gofyn yr un cwestiwn drosodd a throsodd. O ran yr egwyddor fy mod yn gofyn yr un cwestiynau ag y buaswn wedi eu gofyn pe bai uno wedi digwydd, fe wnaethoch chi ddweud ar y pryd eich bod yn gobeithio y byddai'r cytundeb cyflogaeth yn cael ei ymestyn i 2026 gyda'r gyd-fenter. Os na fydd hynny'n digwydd, a fyddech yn dal i geisio'r estyniad hwnnw gan Tata fel y mae - ar yr un telerau, yn ôl pob tebyg? Fe sonioch chi hefyd am natur gystadleuol dur Cymru - mai'r hyn y chwiliwn amdano yw rhywbeth sy'n effeithlon ac yn gynhyrchiol. Mae'n debyg mai'r hyn rwy'n ei ofyn yw, a oes cynllun wrth gefn yma? Os nad yw'r uno'n digwydd, credaf mai'r hyn rwyf eisiau yw rhyw fath o sicrwydd ynglŷn â beth fyddai'n digwydd pe na bai'n digwydd, hynny yw, a oes unrhyw gytundebau esgrow wedi'u llunio ynghylch ymestyn cytundeb cyflogadwyedd? A oedd unrhyw beth arall wedi'i wneud ar ffurf ddrafft, os mynnwch, ac os na fydd yr uno'n digwydd, a oes sicrwydd na fyddwn yn cael ein taflu'n ôl ar unwaith i sefyllfa lle'r oedd pawb ohonom yn gofyn, 'Beth nesaf?' Nawr, rwy'n sylweddoli ei bod braidd yn rhy gynnar i ofyn y cwestiwn hwnnw, ond buaswn wedi hoffi bod yn siŵr fod yna gynllun wrth gefn. Mae'n debyg mai dyna rwy'n ei ofyn. Rwy'n credu mai dyna'r cyfan rwyf am ei ofyn ar hyn o bryd. Byddaf yn gwrando ar yr hyn y mae'r Aelodau eraill yn ei ddweud hefyd - yn fwyaf penodol, rwy'n tybio y gallai Trostre gael sylw yng nghwestiynau pobl eraill hefyd.