English: I thank the Member for his series of comments and questions and the broadly positive start, and I too look forward to seeing more learning from the survey as it undergoes more analysis to help inform where we are and where we want to be. I'll start with your point about e-cigarettes. Just to reiterate that we continue to keep the evidence on e-cigarette use under review, both in terms of their prevalence and the way that their used, their impact potentially on young people and the way in which they're marketed and the flavourings, but in particular the impact of e-cigarette use. We've heard a number of reports about the impact of e-cigarette use itself, with the statement that they are 20 per cent less harmful than tobacco, but of course that doesn't mean to say that they are harm free. So, there is a need to understand what they're used for, the prevalence and what the impact is. We don't yet understand what the long-term use of them will be, but we will continue to look at the evidence and be led by evidence on this issue. I'll deal with your points about food, nutrition and sugar together, if I may. Just to slightly tweak where we are, it wasn't that we rubbished the idea of a sugar levy; it was the idea about how it could be hypothecated. We were never in favour of hypothecating the use of a sugar levy in the way that it was initially presented, but there was never any disagreement between our two parties that a levy on high-sugar-content products could and should be considered. What we have now is a sugar levy on drinks, but it doesn't consider every other part of food as well. Part of the action my predecessor has urged the UK Government to undertake is to do more to promote alternatives to sugar, which we promote ourselves in Wales, but to also look again at regulation for sugar in more than just fizzy drinks. This goes back to the point that food, nutrition and many of the regulatory powers over food and nutrition and nutrition standards are not devolved. There's a balance of what we can and can't do, which is why we do still need to work with the UK Government. I can confirm that there are conversations ongoing between Governments about the introduction of the levy that's been proposed and how that might or might not work, and that work will be taken forward between both my department and also that of the Secretary for Finance and Local Government as well. I hope that we can come back and tell Assembly Members more when we've actually had more constructive conversations, to be able to tell you something more than the fact that we are talking at this point. I want to deal with your point about obesity. We've recognised for some time as a country that we have a significant challenge with obesity - the impact on public health outcomes on a whole range of disease and health condition indicators and the impact it has on people's day-to-day lives, the reality that it is more prevalent in more deprived communities than in others. So, there is no room for any complacency. Part of the difficulty is that it goes back to this point of how we use these results to understand what we need to do more of and how we work more successfully alongside the public to encourage them to make choices for themselves, but not in such a way that we seem to be preaching or nannying the public and telling them what they must do. We have to make healthier choices easier choices. If we look at children, for example, just over one in four children are either overweight or obese. That's our understanding of the child measurement programme, which means that about 73 per cent are a healthy weight. But our problem is that we've not seen the sort of reductions in overweight and obese children that we wish to see, and to combat that we need to see what happens pre school, during school and outside school as well, and we need a culture change broadly across society and within families as well - so an understanding of what the impact is upon a child of an unhealthy diet and the impact on the child of not undertaking enough exercise. So, there is a range of different things for us to do, but just because the picture is complex, it does not mean that we should not wish to do something about it and that we will not wish to do something about it. It's as I said at the end of my initial statement: this is about the public, voluntary organisations, the public and private sectors and individuals themselves understanding and reinforcing what they could and should do and how we make those choices easier for them and the fairly immediate health impacts and health gain that people can see in being a healthier weight.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am ei gyfres o sylwadau a chwestiynau a'r dechrau cadarnhaol ar y cyfan, ac rwyf innau hefyd yn edrych ymlaen at weld mwy o ddysgu o'r arolwg wrth i ragor o waith dadansoddi gael ei wneud i helpu i lywio ein sefyllfa a lle'r ydym eisiau bod. Rwy'n dechrau gyda'ch pwynt am e-sigaréts. Dim ond i ailadrodd ein bod yn parhau i adolygu'r dystiolaeth ar ddefnyddio e-sigarét, o ran pa mor gyffredin ydynt a'r ffordd y cânt eu defnyddio, eu heffaith botensial ar bobl ifanc a'r modd y maent yn cael eu marchnata, a'r cyflasynnau, ond yn enwedig yr effaith y mae defnyddio e-sigaréts yn ei chael. Rydym wedi clywed nifer o adroddiadau am effaith y defnydd o e-sigaréts, â'r datganiad eu bod yn 20 y cant yn llai niweidiol na thybaco. Ond wrth gwrs nid yw hynny'n golygu eu bod yn rhydd o niwed. Felly, mae angen deall i beth y cânt eu defnyddio, pam eu bod mor gyffredin, a beth yw'r effaith. Nid ydym yn deall eto beth fydd y defnydd tymor hir ohonynt, ond byddwn yn parhau i edrych ar y dystiolaeth ac yn cael ein harwain gan dystiolaeth ar y mater hwn. Byddaf yn ymdrin â'ch pwyntiau am fwyd, maeth a siwgr gyda'i gilydd, os caf. Dim ond i addasu ychydig ar y sefyllfa ar hyn o bryd, nid ein bod yn dilorni'r syniad o ardoll ar siwgr; ond yn hytrach y syniad ynghylch sut y gellid ei neilltuo. Nid ydym erioed wedi bod o blaid neilltuo'r defnydd o'r ardoll ar siwgr yn y modd y cafodd ei gyflwyno i ddechrau, ond ni fu unrhyw anghytundeb erioed rhwng ein dwy blaid y gellid ac y dylid ystyried ardoll ar gynnyrch cynnwys siwgr uchel. Yr hyn sydd gennym yn awr yw ardoll ar siwgr mewn diodydd, ond nid yw'n ystyried pob rhan arall o fwyd yn ogystal â hynny. Rhan o'r gweithredu y mae fy rhagflaenydd wedi annog Llywodraeth y DU i ymgymryd ag ef yw gwneud mwy i hyrwyddo dewisiadau heblaw siwgr, yr ydym yn ei hyrwyddo ein hunain yng Nghymru, ond hefyd mae angen edrych eto ar reoleiddio ar gyfer siwgr mewn mwy na diodydd byrlymog yn unig. Mae hyn yn mynd yn ôl at y pwynt nad yw bwyd, maeth a llawer o'r pwerau rheoleiddio dros fwyd a maeth a safonau maeth wedi'u datganoli. Mae cydbwysedd rhwng yr hyn y gallwn ac na allwn ei wneud, a dyna pam mae angen inni weithio gyda Llywodraeth y DU o hyd. Gallaf gadarnhau bod sgyrsiau parhaus rhwng y Llywodraethau ynghylch cyflwyno'r ardoll a gynigiwyd a sut y gallai neu efallai na fydd yn gweithio, ac y bydd y gwaith yn cael ei ddatblygu rhwng fy adran i a hefyd adran yr Ysgrifennydd Cyllid a Llywodraeth Leol hefyd. Rwy'n gobeithio y gallwn ddod yn ôl a dweud mwy wrth Aelodau'r Cynulliad pan fyddwn wedi cael sgyrsiau mwy adeiladol, a'n bod yn gallu dweud rhywbeth mwy wrthych na'r ffaith ein bod yn siarad ar y pwynt hwn. Rwyf am ymdrin â'ch pwynt ynghylch gordewdra. Rydym wedi cydnabod ers amser fel gwlad bod gordewdra yn her sylweddol - yr effaith ar ganlyniadau iechyd cyhoeddus ar ystod eang o ddangosyddion afiechyd a chyflwr iechyd a'r effaith a gaiff ar fywydau pobl o ddydd i ddydd, a'r realiti ei bod yn fwy cyffredin mewn cymunedau lle ceir mwy o amddifadedd nag mewn eraill. Felly, nid oes lle i fod yn hunanfodlon. Rhan o'r anhawster yw ei fod yn mynd yn ôl i'r pwynt o sut yr ydym yn defnyddio'r canlyniadau hyn i ddeall beth sydd angen i ni wneud mwy ohono, a sut yr ydym yn gweithio'n fwy llwyddiannus ochr yn ochr â'r cyhoedd i'w hannog i wneud dewisiadau drostynt eu hunain, ond ein bod yn gwneud hynny mewn modd nad yw'n ymddangos ein bod yn pregethu wrth y cyhoedd neu'n eu maldodi ac yn dweud wrthynt beth mae'n rhaid iddynt ei wneud. Mae'n rhaid i ni wneud dewisiadau iachach yn ddewisiadau haws. Os edrychwn ar blant, er enghraifft, mae ychydig dros un o bob pedwar plentyn naill ai'n rhy drwm neu'n ordew. Dyna ein dealltwriaeth o'r rhaglen mesur plant, sy'n golygu bod tua 73 y cant ar bwysau iach. Ond ein problem ni yw nad ydym wedi gweld y math o golli pwysau mewn plant dros bwysau a gordew yr ydym am ei weld, ac i fynd i'r afael â hynny mae angen inni weld beth sy'n digwydd i blant cyn iddynt fynd i'r ysgol, yn ystod yr ysgol a thu allan yr ysgol hefyd. Mae angen newid diwylliant yn gyffredinol ar draws cymdeithas ac o fewn teuluoedd - felly dealltwriaeth o beth yw effaith deiet afiach ar blentyn ac effaith peidio â gwneud digon o ymarfer corff ar blentyn. Felly, mae ystod o wahanol bethau i ni eu gwneud. Ond gan fod y darlun yn gymhleth, nid yw hynny'n golygu na ddylem ddymuno gwneud rhywbeth am y peth ac na fyddwn yn dymuno gwneud rhywbeth am y peth. Fel y dywedais ar ddiwedd fy natganiad cychwynnol: mae hyn yn ymwneud â'r cyhoedd, cyrff gwirfoddol, y sector cyhoeddus a'r sector preifat ac unigolion eu hunain yn deall ac yn atgyfnerthu'r hyn y gallent ac y dylent ei wneud, a sut yr ydym ni yn gwneud y dewisiadau hynny'n haws iddynt, a bod pobl yn gallu gweld ar unwaith yr effeithiau gwell ar iechyd o fod ar bwysau iachach.