English: Sorry, just two more quick points. I do apologise for overrunning. Cadw's budget - if you look at last year's budget rounds, you'll see that Cadw's budget, I believe, was reduced by more than the national museum, so in terms of marketing, it's actually done more with less by driving up income and figures. In terms of St Fagans - oh, and I also believe that there are many contracts that the national museum has with external partners who carry out marketing functions and catering functions. So, it's not as though everything is currently delivered by the museum itself. So, if there are already companies in the private sector that are carrying out some of the work on behalf of the museum, what would stop those companies or companies that operate on behalf of Cadw from actually doing it together - again, just joining up, making sure that we have efficiencies of scale? In terms of St Fagans, I hear what the Member said - I think it was Dai Lloyd who suggested that this operation could harm the St Fagans project. As the Member has suggested that, I am quite happy to carry out an investigation - an inquiry into the work that's been conducted so far at St Fagans and an assessment of whether any move to create Historic Wales would impact on the scheduled completion of that project. I am absolutely certain that project will drive up numbers, as Bethan Jenkins says. But in terms of visitor numbers, I think it's also important not to set targets that are lower - future year targets - lower than what you are currently achieving, and I'm afraid, in the past, we have had just that from the museum. That must stop. I think David Rowlands is right, we do need to set more stretching targets - not just to get the same people repeatedly visiting our national institutions, but actually to get new people as well visiting national institutions.
Welsh: Mae'n ddrwg gennyf, dim ond dau bwynt arall cyflym. Dwi yn ymddiheuro am fynd dros amser. Cyllideb Cadw - os edrychwch ar rowndiau cyllideb y llynedd, byddwch yn gweld bod cyllideb Cadw, rwy'n credu, wedi ei lleihau gan fwy na'r amgueddfa genedlaethol, felly o ran marchnata, mewn gwirionedd mae wedi gwneud mwy gyda llai wrth wella incwm a ffigurau. Yn nhermau Sain Ffagan - o, ac rwyf hefyd yn credu bod llawer o gontractau sydd gan yr amgueddfa genedlaethol â phartneriaid allanol sy'n cyflawni swyddogaethau marchnata a swyddogaethau arlwyo. Felly, nid yw fel pe bai popeth yn cael ei wneud ar hyn o bryd gan yr amgueddfa ei hun. Felly, os oes cwmnïau yn y sector preifat sydd eisoes yn gwneud rhywfaint o waith ar ran yr amgueddfa, beth fyddai'n atal y cwmnïau hynny neu gwmnïau sy'n gweithredu ar ran Cadw mewn gwirionedd rhag ei wneud gyda'i gilydd - unwaith eto, dim ond cydgysylltu, gan wneud yn siŵr ein bod yn sicrhau arbedion maint? O ran Sain Ffagan, rwy'n clywed yr hyn a ddywedodd yr Aelod - rwy'n meddwl mai Dai Lloyd a awgrymodd y gallai'r gweithrediad hwn niweidio prosiect Sain Ffagan. Gan fod yr Aelod wedi awgrymu hynny, rwy'n gwbl hapus i gynnal ymchwiliad - ymchwiliad i'r gwaith sydd wedi ei gynnal hyd yn hyn yn Sain Ffagan ac asesiad o b'un a fyddai unrhyw symudiad i greu Cymru Hanesyddol yn effeithio ar gwblhau'r prosiect hwnnw. Rwy'n gwbl sicr y bydd y prosiect yn cynyddu niferoedd, fel y dywedodd Bethan Jenkins. Ond o ran niferoedd ymwelwyr, rwy'n credu ei fod hefyd yn bwysig peidio â gosod targedau sy'n is - targedau blynyddoedd i ddod - sy'n is na'r hyn yr ydych yn ei gyflawni ar hyn o bryd, ac yn anffodus, yn y gorffennol, rydym wedi gweld yr amgueddfa yn gwneud hynny. Mae'n rhaid i hynny ddod i ben. Rwy'n meddwl bod David Rowlands yn iawn, mae'n rhaid i ni osod targedau sy'n ymestyn - nid dim ond i gael yr un bobl dro ar ôl tro yn ymweld â'n sefydliadau cenedlaethol, ond i ddenu pobl newydd i ymweld â sefydliadau cenedlaethol hefyd.