English: I'm pleased to have the opportunity to contribute in this important debate, as we've endured yet another round of damaging and senseless restrictions. The First Minister and the health Minister's approach on messaging since the omicron variant arrived in Wales has been chaotic and contradictory. It has increased fear and it could be argued that it was a political decision in some respects. Most worryingly, most of these decisions didn't seem to be based on science, with a quite obvious lack of evidence to back up any decisions being made. There is a fine balance when weighing up the balance of harms, when we're making these tough decisions and they are tough decisions - everyone recognises that. But when they are decisions with such huge implications on lives and livelihoods, some degree of explanation coupled with evidence is needed to explain why you are, in some cases, destroying someone's business by taking a specific decision. Once again, the immediate reaction of this Welsh Government to the new variant was to hastily shut businesses and take away freedoms. It comes as no surprise to me as we have a First Minister who has spent his career theorising about socialism instead of running a business or having to worry about paying staff. The decision to move back to level 2 forced outdoor spectator sports events to close their doors once again to fans, and other community sports events and gatherings were referred to as 'superspreader events', despite no evidence being presented, which understandably created outrage. These restrictions prevented more than 50 people partaking in sports outdoors, yet the same restrictions allowed for more than 50 people to be present in an indoor environment, providing that they are seated, where ventilation would be far lower. It is no wonder that people were angry and fed up with these nonsensical restrictions on our lives. Deputy Presiding Officer, I couldn't understand why the Welsh Government refused to publish the evidence behind their decision, however seeing the data for myself and looking across at how England fared without restrictions, I can now see why. Welsh people and businesses cannot plan for the future or live their lives while the Welsh Government continues to enforce draconian -
Welsh: Rwy'n falch o gael cyfle i gyfrannu at y ddadl bwysig hon, gan ein bod wedi dioddef cylch arall o gyfyngiadau niweidiol ac afresymol. Mae dull y Prif Weinidog a'r Gweinidog iechyd o rannu negeseuon ers i'r amrywiolyn omicron gyrraedd Cymru wedi bod yn anhrefnus ac yn anghyson. Mae wedi codi ofn a gellid dadlau ei fod yn benderfyniad gwleidyddol mewn rhai ffyrdd. Yn fwyaf pryderus, nid oedd yn ymddangos bod y rhan fwyaf o'r penderfyniadau hyn yn seiliedig ar wyddoniaeth, gyda diffyg tystiolaeth amlwg i ategu unrhyw benderfyniadau a wnaed. Mae cydbwysedd anodd i'w daro wrth bwyso a mesur gwahanol fathau o niwed, pan fyddwn yn gwneud y penderfyniadau anodd hyn ac maent yn benderfyniadau anodd - mae pawb yn cydnabod hynny. Ond pan fyddant yn benderfyniadau sydd â goblygiadau mor enfawr i fywydau a bywoliaeth pobl, mae angen rhywfaint o esboniad ynghyd â thystiolaeth i egluro pam eich bod, mewn rhai achosion, yn dinistrio busnes rhywun drwy wneud penderfyniad penodol. Unwaith eto, ymateb uniongyrchol Llywodraeth Cymru i'r amrywiolyn newydd oedd cau busnesau'n frysiog a chyfyngu ar ryddid. Nid yw'n syndod i mi gan fod gennym Brif Weinidog sydd wedi treulio ei yrfa'n damcaniaethu am sosialaeth yn hytrach na rhedeg busnes neu orfod poeni am dalu staff. Fe wnaeth y penderfyniad i symud yn ôl i reoliadau lefel 2 orfodi digwyddiadau chwaraeon gwylwyr awyr agored i gau eu drysau i gefnogwyr unwaith eto, a chyfeiriwyd at gynulliadau a digwyddiadau chwaraeon cymunedol eraill fel 'digwyddiadau lle heintir llawer', er na chyflwynwyd unrhyw dystiolaeth, ac yn ddealladwy, fe greodd hynny gryn ddicter. Roedd y cyfyngiadau hyn yn atal mwy na 50 o bobl rhag cymryd rhan mewn chwaraeon yn yr awyr agored, ac eto roedd yr un cyfyngiadau'n caniatáu i fwy na 50 o bobl fod yn bresennol mewn digwyddiad dan do, ar yr amod eu bod yn eistedd, lle byddai awyru ar lefel lawer is. Nid yw'n syndod fod pobl yn ddig ac wedi cael llond bol ar y cyfyngiadau disynnwyr hyn ar ein bywydau. Ddirprwy Lywydd, ni allwn ddeall pam y gwrthododd Llywodraeth Cymru gyhoeddi'r dystiolaeth a oedd yn sail i'w penderfyniad, ond o weld y data drosof fy hun ac edrych ar sut y bu i Loegr ymdopi heb gyfyngiadau, gallaf weld pam yn awr. Ni all pobl a busnesau Cymru gynllunio ar gyfer y dyfodol na byw eu bywydau tra bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn parhau i orfodi -