techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Llywydd, all we've had from successive Labour Governments is dither, dither, dither, and that answer is just further dithering from you, First Minister. It's quite clear that, despite £44 million of taxpayers' money being spent on the inquiry into solutions for the M4 relief road, the details are now gathering dust on your desk, First Minister, given that it has been months since the report was published. Your Government is continuing to drag its heels on finding a viable solution, and the uncertainty that this is creating is hurting Welsh businesses and is damaging investment. Now, last week, more than 90 major businesses, who represent a quarter of the Welsh workforce, wrote to you urgently seeking clarification on this issue. You must end this uncertainty by finally telling Wales what your plans are. So, can you be clear here today? If the findings of the inquiry recommend the black route, will your Government then accept the outcome and actually deliver on the black route?
Welsh: Llywydd, y cwbl yr ydym ni wedi ei gael gan Lywodraethau Llafur olynol yw gogor-droi, gogor-droi, gogor droi, a'r cwbl yw'r ateb yna yw mwy o ogor-droi gennych chi, Prif Weinidog. Mae'n eithaf eglur, er gwaethaf y ffaith fod £44 miliwn o arian trethdalwyr wedi cael ei wario ar yr ymchwiliad i atebion ar gyfer ffordd liniaru'r M4, bod y manylion yn hel llwch ar eich desg chi erbyn hyn, Prif Weinidog, o gofio y bu misoedd ers cyhoeddi'r adroddiad. Mae eich Llywodraeth yn parhau i lusgo eich traed o ran dod o hyd i ateb ymarferol, ac mae'r ansicrwydd y mae hyn yn ei greu yn niweidio busnesau Cymru ac yn niweidio buddsoddiad. Nawr, yr wythnos diwethaf, ysgrifennodd mwy na 90 o fusnesau mawr, sy'n cynrychioli chwarter gweithlu Cymru, atoch chi yn gofyn am eglurhad ar y mater hwn ar frys. Mae'n rhaid i chi roi terfyn ar yr ansicrwydd hwn trwy ddweud wrth Gymru o'r diwedd beth yw eich cynlluniau. Felly, a allwch chi fod yn eglur yn y fan yma heddiw? Os bydd canfyddiadau'r ymchwiliad yn argymell y llwybr du, a wnaiff eich Llywodraeth dderbyn y canlyniad wedyn a darparu'r llwybr du mewn gwirionedd?
English: Well, the Member cannot possibly imagine that I'm going to give him an answer to that question on the floor of the Assembly when I have neither seen the report nor seen any of the accompanying advice that would be necessary for me. It would be reckless in the extreme to do so, and it would simply put whatever I said in legal jeopardy by those who might wish to challenge it. Of course I saw what the CBI and others have said, and the answer that I give to them must be the same as I've given to you: I will make a decision in the best possible way. I will do it in full consideration of all the factors that go into making it, and I will make it in the best way that I can.
Welsh: Wel, does bosib bod yr aelod yn dychmygu fy mod i'n mynd i roi ateb iddo i'r cwestiwn hwnnw ar lawr y Cynulliad pan nad wyf i wedi gweld yr adroddiad nac wedi gweld dim o'r cyngor ategol a fyddai'n angenrheidiol i mi. Byddai gwneud hynny yn anghyfrifol dros ben, a'r cwbl y byddai'n ei wneud fyddai rhoi beth bynnag a ddywedais mewn perygl cyfreithiol gan y rhai a allai ddymuno ei herio. Wrth gwrs, gwelais yr hyn a ddywedodd y CBI ac eraill, ac mae'n rhaid i'r ateb a roddaf iddyn nhw fod yr un fath ag yr wyf i wedi ei roi i chi: byddaf yn gwneud penderfyniad yn y ffordd orau bosibl. Byddaf yn ei wneud gan roi ystyriaeth lawn i'r holl ffactorau sy'n cyfrannu at ei wneud, a byddaf yn ei wneud yn y ffordd orau y gallaf.
English: First Minister, my question was a straightforward question, but, again, you can't give a straightforward answer. Welsh Labour have now stalled on this issue for almost 20 years, and appear as incapable as ever of driving forward a solution to the problem. It's beginning to look, from where I'm standing, like this project walked out the door with the previous First Minister. The damaging effects of your policy failures on developing an effective transport system are clear. Welsh gross value added is at the bottom of the UK league table; productivity is at the bottom of the UK league table; wages are at the bottom of the UK league table. And we can't underestimate how important this infrastructure project is for improving the economic fortunes of Wales. So, First Minister, if you're not going to deliver on the black route, can you tell us what solutions you will then bring forward as a Government, because the people of Wales have waited long enough?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, roedd fy nghwestiwn yn gwestiwn syml, ond, unwaith eto, ni allwch chi roi ateb syml. Mae Llafur Cymru wedi oedi ar y mater hwn ers bron i 20 mlynedd erbyn hyn, ac mae'n ymddangos fel pe byddai mor analluog ag erioed i fwrw ymlaen ag ateb i'r broblem. Mae'n dechrau edrych, o'm safbwynt i, fel pe byddai'r prosiect hwn wedi cerdded drwy'r drws gyda'r Prif Weinidog blaenorol. Mae effeithiau niweidiol eich methiannau polisi o ran datblygu system drafnidiaeth effeithiol yn eglur. Mae gwerth ychwanegol gros Cymru ar waelod tabl cynghrair y DU; mae cynhyrchiant ar waelod tabl cynghrair y DU; mae cyflogau ar waelod tabl cynghrair y DU. Ac ni allwn danbrisio pa mor bwysig yw'r prosiect seilwaith hwn ar gyfer gwella ffyniant economaidd Cymru. Felly, Prif Weinidog, os nad ydych chi'n mynd gyflwyno'r llwybr DU, a allwch chi ddweud wrthym ni pa atebion y byddwch chi'n eu cynnig fel Llywodraeth, oherwydd mae pobl Cymru wedi aros yn ddigon hir?
English: Llywydd, it is difficult sometimes to listen to what the Member says without remembering that his party's the one that failed to bring electrification of the railways, that has presided over the delays in Wylfa - [ Interruption.] And when it comes, Llywydd, to waiting to act on a report, how many months, and, eventually, into years went by before his Government acted to turn down the report that itself had commissioned in relation to the Swansea bay tidal lagoon? So, I think he's got plenty to think about in his party's own record. Let me say this to him: his question to me was the absolute opposite of straightforward. It pretended that it is possible to give a simple answer to a complex question, that without having considered any of the advice or the report itself that I should come to a conclusion here on the floor of the Assembly. It would be the absolute opposite of sensible ways of proceeding for me to have taken his advice.
Welsh: Llywydd, mae'n anodd gwrando weithiau ar yr hyn y mae'r Aelod yn ei ddweud heb gofio mai ei blaid ef yw'r un sydd wedi methu â thrydaneiddio'r rheilffyrdd, sydd wedi bod yn gyfrifol am oediadau yn Wylfa - [ Torri ar draws.] A phan ddaw, Llywydd, i aros i weithredu ar adroddiad, sawl mis, ac, yn y pen draw, blwyddyn aeth heibio cyn i'w Lywodraeth ef weithredu i wrthod yr adroddiad yr oedd hi ei hun wedi ei gomisiynu o ran morlyn llanw bae Abertawe? Felly, credaf fod ganddo ddigon i feddwl amdano o ran hanes ei blaid ei hun. Gadewch i mi ddweud hyn wrtho: roedd ei gwestiwn i mi y gwrthwyneb llwyr i syml. Roedd yn esgus ei bod yn bosibl rhoi ateb syml i gwestiwn cymhleth, y dylwn ddod i gasgliad yma ar lawr y Cynulliad heb ystyried dim o'r cyngor na'r adroddiad ei hun. Byddai hynny i'r gwrthwyneb yn llwyr o ffyrdd synhwyrol o weithredu i mi fod wedi dilyn ei gyngor.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. First Minister, can you assure the Senedd that your leading civil servant, Permanent secretary Dame Shan Morgan, has not indicated in conversation with you, or Cabinet or other colleagues that she is willing to leave her position before her contract ends in 2022?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, a allwch chi sicrhau'r Senedd nad yw eich gwas sifil blaenllaw, yr ysgrifennydd Parhaol y Fonesig Shan Morgan, wedi dweud mewn sgwrs gyda chi, neu'r Cabinet neu gydweithwyr eraill ei bod yn fodlon gadael ei swydd cyn i'w chontract ddod i ben yn 2022?
English: I give the Member an assurance that no such conversations have taken place.
Welsh: Rhoddaf sicrwydd i'r Aelod na fu unrhyw sgyrsiau o'r fath.
English: First Minister, I'm afraid I have to press you again on this point, and this is because of the nature of the way this alleged departure has emerged in the media, as reported last Thursday by the Western Mail 's chief reporter, Martin Shipton. He refers to a number of senior, and, as he puts it, well-placed sources in the Welsh Government providing him with the information that there have been discussions about Dame Shan Morgan's early departure. Now, there are two possibilities arising from the story as reported: either it is true, in which case the Permanent Secretary might have a case to claim constructive dismissal, or it is not, in which case someone is trying to deliberately undermine the Permanent Secretary. The Government, under your predecessor, had to deny allegations of briefing against individuals. Aren't you just a bit concerned that this practice seems to be continuing?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, mae gen i ofn bod yn rhaid i mi bwyso arnoch chi unwaith eto ynghylch y pwynt hwn, ac mae hyn oherwydd natur y mae'r ymadawiad honedig hwn wedi dod i'r amlwg yn y cyfryngau, fel yr adroddwyd ddydd Iau diwethaf gan brif ohebydd y Western Mail, Martin Shipton. Mae'n cyfeirio at y ffaith fod nifer o ffynonellau uwch, ac, fel y mae ef yn ei eirio, rhai sydd mewn sefyllfa dda yn Llywodraeth Cymru wedi rhoi'r wybodaeth iddo y bu trafodaethau ynghylch ymadawiad cynnar y Fonesig Shan Morgan. Nawr, ceir dau bosibilrwydd sy'n deillio o'r stori fel y'i hadroddwyd: naill ai mae'n wir, sy'n golygu y gallai fod gan yr Ysgrifennydd Parhaol achos i hawlio diswyddiad adeiladol, neu nid yw'n wir, ac felly mae rhywun yn ceisio tanseilio'r Ysgrifennydd Parhaol yn fwriadol. Bu'n rhaid i'ch Llywodraeth chi, o dan eich rhagflaenydd, wadu honiadau o friffio yn erbyn unigolion. Onid ydych chi rhywfaint yn bryderus ei bod yn ymddangos bod yr arfer hwn yn parhau?
English: Well, Llywydd, as far as that story's concerned, I think I'm as well placed a source as the Member will ever have. What I wanted to do - . I'm not going to be drawn into speculation about how other people may have come across information they think they have and so on. What I will do is simply report the direct conversations that I have had with the individual that the Member has named, and I give him this assurance absolutely that the things that he has read in the newspaper have never once arisen in any conversation that I have had with the Permanent Secretary, and that the correction that was issued by the Welsh Government and carried in that story 100 per cent represents the position of the Welsh Government.
Welsh: Wel, Llywydd, cyn belled ag y mae'r stori honno yn y cwestiwn, rwy'n credu fy mod i'n ffynhonnell sydd mewn cystal sefyllfa ag y bydd gan yr Aelod fyth. Yr hyn yr oeddwn i eisiau ei wneud - . Nid wyf i'n mynd i gael fy nhynnu i mewn i ddyfalu ynghylch sut y mae pobl eraill wedi dod o hyd i wybodaeth y maen nhw'n credu sydd ganddyn nhw ac yn y blaen. Yr hyn a wnaf, yn syml, yw hysbysu am y sgyrsiau uniongyrchol yr wyf i wedi eu cael gyda'r unigolyn y mae'r Aelod wedi ei henwi, a rhoddaf iddo'r sicrwydd llwyr hwn nad yw'r pethau y mae wedi eu darllen yn y papur newydd erioed wedi codi mewn unrhyw sgwrs yr wyf i wedi ei chael gyda'r Ysgrifennydd Parhaol, a bod y cywiriad a gyhoeddwyd gan Lywodraeth Cymru ac a gafodd ei gynnwys yn y stori honno yn cynrychioli safbwynt Llywodraeth Cymru 100 y cant.
English: First Minister, when John Howard famously sacked all his departmental heads 20 years ago in Australia, it was dubbed 'the night of the long knives'. Now your Government is denying all knowledge of conversations several senior sources have maintained did happen. It seems to be a night of the short memories. Now, it said in the article that you're anxious to have a fresh start, but to give what you said now, today, on the record, added credence, can you confirm that neither you nor anyone acting on your behalf will either request or agree to the Permanent Secretary terminating her contract early? There is, after all, a very important principle here - the clue is in the name 'permanent' secretary. In order to protect the impartiality and independence of the civil service, politicians should never be able to sack the senior civil service. So, does the First Minister agree that, if there is no fresh start over the next two and a half years, it's the people then who will be the judge, and the person then who should be sacked under those circumstances will be you?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, yn yr achos enwog pan wnaeth John Howard ddiswyddo ei holl benaethiaid adrannol 20 mlynedd yn ôl yn Awstralia, cyfeiriwyd ato fel 'noson y cyllyll hir'. Nawr mae eich Llywodraeth chi yn gwadu pob gwybodaeth am sgyrsiau y mae sawl ffynhonnell uwch wedi mynnu eu bod wedi digwydd. Mae'n ymddangos mai noson y cofion byr yw hon. Nawr, roedd yn dweud yn yr erthygl eich bod chi'n awyddus i gael dechrau newydd, ond i roi mwy o hygrededd i'r hyn a ddywedasoch nawr, heddiw, ar y cofnod, a allwch chi gadarnhau na fyddwch chi nac unrhyw un sy'n gweithredu ar eich rhan naill ai'n gwneud cais nac yn cytuno i'r Ysgrifennydd Parhaol derfynu ei chontract yn gynnar? Wedi'r cyfan, mae egwyddor bwysig iawn yn y fan yma - mae'r cliw yn yr enw ysgrifennydd 'parhaol'. Er mwyn gwarchod natur ddiduedd ac annibyniaeth y gwasanaeth sifil, ni ddylai gwleidyddion byth allu diswyddo'r gwasanaeth sifil uwch. Felly, a yw'r Prif Weinidog yn cytuno, os na fydd unrhyw ddechrau newydd yn ystod y ddwy flynedd a hanner nesaf, mai'r bobl fydd y barnwr wedyn, ac mai chi fydd yr unigolyn a ddylai gael ei ddiswyddo wedyn o dan yr amgylchiadau hynny ?
English: Well, let me try and rescue something from the Member's final question that would be worth a sensible response. I completely agree with what Adam Price said that the independence and the impartiality of the civil service is central to the way that we do business, and it is central to the way that this Government does business here in Wales, and there is nothing that I will do or any Member of my Government will do to cast any doubt on that principle. Of course, the Member was right that, in the end, we all work for the people who elect us, and every one of us - every one of us - is in a position at the end of an Assembly term where a verdict will be passed on us by the people who sent us here in the first place, and so that should be.
Welsh: Wel, gadewch imi geisio achub rhywbeth o gwestiwn olaf yr Aelod a fyddai'n werth ymateb synhwyrol. Rwy'n cytuno'n llwyr â'r hyn a ddywedodd Adam Price bod annibyniaeth a natur ddiduedd y gwasanaeth sifil yn ganolog i'r ffordd yr ydym ni'n cyflawni busnes, ac mae'n ganolog i'r ffordd y mae'r Llywodraeth hon yn cyflawni busnes yma yng Nghymru, ac nid oes dim y byddaf i'n ei wneud nac y bydd unrhyw Aelod o'm Llywodraeth yn ei wneud i godi unrhyw amheuon ynghylch yr egwyddor honno. Wrth gwrs, roedd yr Aelod yn iawn ein bod ni i gyd, yn y pen draw, yn gweithio i'r bobl sy'n ein hethol ni, ac mae pob un ohonom ni - pob un ohonom ni - mewn sefyllfa ar ddiwedd tymor Cynulliad lle bydd dyfarniad yn cael ei wneud arnom ni gan y bobl a'n hanfonodd ni yma yn y lle cyntaf, ac felly y dylai hi fod.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. First Minister, Cardiff's bus services are in a crisis. The council-run Cardiff Bus lost nearly £2 million last year and is haemorrhaging money. Cardiff Bus has responded by cutting routes and raising fares, which affects passengers, and by downgrading pay and conditions for its own staff. It still hasn't filed its accounts for last year. What are your reflections on Cardiff's bus crisis and its implications for bus services in the rest of Wales?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, mae gwasanaethau bws Caerdydd mewn argyfwng. Fe wnaeth Bws Caerdydd, sy'n cael ei redeg gan y cyngor, golled o bron i £2 filiwn y llynedd ac mae'n colli arian ar gyfradd aruthrol. Mae Bws Caerdydd wedi ymateb trwy dorri llwybrau a chodi prisiau tocynnau, sy'n effeithio ar deithwyr, a thrwy israddio tâl ac amodau ar gyfer ei staff ei hun. Mae'n dal i fod heb ffeilio ei gyfrifon ar gyfer y llynedd. Beth yw eich myfyrdodau ar argyfwng bysiau Caerdydd a'i oblygiadau ar gyfer gwasanaethau bysiau yng ngweddill Cymru?
English: I thank the Member for the question. The points he raises are important ones to people who live in the capital city particularly. It is because of the situation in Cardiff Bus company that my colleague Ken Skates has asked Transport for Wales to go to the company to offer advice to them, to make sure that they have whatever support they need to try to make sure that they respond to the commercial pressures that they face and to make decisions that promote the long-term health of bus services in the capital city.
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn. Mae'r pwyntiau y mae'n eu codi yn rhai pwysig i bobl sy'n byw yn y brifddinas yn arbennig. Oherwydd y sefyllfa yng nghwmni Bws Caerdydd y mae fy nghyd-Weinidog Ken Skates wedi gofyn i Trafnidiaeth Cymru gysylltu â'r cwmni i gynnig cyngor iddyn nhw, i wneud yn siŵr eu bod nhw'n cael pa bynnag gymorth sydd ei angen arnyn nhw i geisio gwneud yn siŵr eu bod nhw'n ymateb i'r pwysau masnachol y maen nhw'n ei wynebu ac i wneud penderfyniadau sy'n hybu iechyd hirdymor gwasanaethau bysiau yn y brifddinas.
English: I'm glad that action has been taken already and I'm glad that your transport Minister is already on the case and there is going to be discussion with Cardiff Council. But problems with transport in Cardiff have been going on for some time, so I think perhaps I can give some pointers - I know he's a very able Cabinet Minister, but perhaps I can offer some pointers on this occasion. It's Cardiff Council that oversees the operation of Cardiff Bus and scrutinises it, but I wonder how effective that scrutiny actually is. Cardiff Council, which is run by your Welsh Labour Party has no transport committee to oversee the bus operations. Cardiff Bus is actually overseen by the environment committee, which seems to be a very wide-ranging committee, and I wonder how far they look at the bus operations. Also, it is chaired by Ramesh Patel, who until recently was the council cabinet member for transport. So, to some extent, he's effectively scrutinising decisions that he made himself not so long ago as the cabinet member. Of course, you will be aware of this, First Minister, since when he has time to do so Councillor Patel also works for you at the Assembly. Are you confident that Cardiff Council's Labour-dominated environment committee actually has the ability to oversee what Cardiff Bus is doing and help to turn around this staggering mess?
Welsh: Rwy'n falch bod camau wedi eu cymryd eisoes ac rwy'n falch bod eich Gweinidog trafnidiaeth eisoes yn rhoi sylw i'r mater ac y bydd trafodaeth gyda Chyngor Caerdydd. Ond mae problemau gyda thrafnidiaeth yng Nghaerdydd wedi bodoli ers cryn amser, felly rwy'n credu efallai y gallaf i gynnig rhai awgrymiadau - gwn ei fod yn Weinidog Cabinet galluog iawn, ond efallai y gallaf i gynnig rhai awgrymiadau y tro hwn. Cyngor Caerdydd sy'n goruchwylio gweithrediad Bws Caerdydd ac yn craffu arno, ond tybed pa mor effeithiol yw'r craffu hwnnw mewn gwirionedd. Nid oes gan Gyngor Caerdydd, sy'n cael ei redeg gan eich Plaid Llafur Cymru chi bwyllgor trafnidiaeth i oruchwylio gweithrediadau bysiau. Caiff Bws Caerdydd ei oruchwylio gan bwyllgor yr amgylchedd mewn gwirionedd, sy'n ymddangos fel pwyllgor eang iawn, a tybed pa mor drylwyr maen nhw'n ystyried y gweithrediadau bysiau. Hefyd, caiff ei gadeirio gan Ramesh Patel, ac fe oedd aelod cabinet y cyngor dros drafnidiaeth tan yn ddiweddar. Felly, i ryw raddau, mae'n craffu i bob pwrpas ar benderfyniadau a wnaed ganddo ef ei hun nid mor bell yn ôl fel yr aelod cabinet. Wrth gwrs, byddwch yn ymwybodol o hyn, Prif Weinidog, oherwydd pan fo ganddo'r amser i wneud hynny, mae'r Cynghorydd Patel hefyd yn gweithio i chi yn y Cynulliad. A ydych chi'n ffyddiog fod gan bwyllgor yr amgylchedd Cyngor Caerdydd, sy'n llawn aelodau Llafur, y gallu mewn gwirionedd i oruchwylio'r hyn y mae Bws Caerdydd yn ei wneud a helpu i roi trefn ar y llanastr syfrdanol hwn?
English: Well, Llywydd, there is a proper arrangement in which there is a board that looks after Cardiff Bus and the relationship between it and the city council is one for the city council itself to be satisfied with, not for me. Insofar as I see it from the outside, I believe those scrutiny arrangements are robust. Following the White Paper that my colleague Ken Skates has published and its debate here in the Assembly, it may lead to a joint transport authority, which would further reinforce the scrutiny arrangements over what goes on in Cardiff but more widely across the whole of the south Wales region and beyond.
Welsh: Wel, Llywydd, mae trefniant priodol lle ceir bwrdd sy'n gofalu am Bws Caerdydd ac mae'r berthynas rhwng y cwmni a chyngor y ddinas yn un i gyngor y ddinas ei hun i fod yn fodlon â hi, nid i mi. Cyn belled ag y gwelaf i o'r tu allan, rwy'n credu bod y trefniadau craffu hynny yn gadarn. Yn dilyn y Papur Gwyn y mae fy nghyd-Weinidog Ken Skates wedi ei gyhoeddi ac yn y ddadl yn ei gylch yma yn y Cynulliad, gallai arwain at awdurdod trafnidiaeth ar y cyd, a fyddai'n atgyfnerthu'r trefniadau craffu ymhellach dros yr hyn sy'n digwydd yng Nghaerdydd ond yn fwy eang ar draws holl ranbarth de Cymru a thu hwnt.
English: I'm interested in what you say about the joint transport authority. I think that's something, and it's better than simply saying, 'It's a matter for the local council', which is the kind of response that Ministers here tend to usually hide behind. But it is interesting, is it not, that when you campaigned for the job of First Minister, one of your policies was to agree with Jeremy Corbyn that we need to return to having more municipal bus companies here in Wales? If you did what you said you would do and you went for more municipal bus companies, would this not simply be extending Cardiff's failing model across the whole of Wales and causing more problems for the hard-pressed Welsh taxpayer?
Welsh: Mae gen i ddiddordeb yn yr hyn yr ydych chi'n ei ddweud am yr awdurdod trafnidiaeth ar y cyd. Credaf fod hynny'n rhywbeth, ac mae'n well na dim ond dweud, 'Mater i'r cyngor lleol yw hwn', sef y math o ymateb y mae Gweinidogion yn y fan yma yn tueddu i guddio y tu ôl iddo fel rheol. Ond mae'n ddiddorol, onid yw, pan wnaethoch chi ymgyrchu ar gyfer swydd y Prif Weinidog, mai un o'ch polisïau oedd cytuno gyda Jeremy Corbyn bod angen i ni ddychwelyd i gael mwy o gwmnïau bysiau trefol yma yng Nghymru? Pe byddech chi'n gwneud yr hyn y dywedasoch chi y byddech chi'n ei wneud ac yn ceisio cael mwy o gwmnïau bysiau trefol, onid yw'n wir mai'r cwbl y byddai hyn yn ei wneud yw ymestyn model aflwyddiannus Caerdydd ledled Cymru gyfan ac achosi mwy o broblemau i drethdalwyr Cymru, sydd eisoes o dan bwysau?