English: The scheme that will follow the ETS will play a key role therefore in how the Welsh Government will reach its target for reducing emissions. It's a matter of disappointment, therefore, that the Welsh Government has accepted recommendation 5 only in principle - that old trick of accepting things in principle, rather than just accepting them and going for it. Now, the EU ETS is one of the 24 devolved areas that fall under discussions on common frameworks under the inter-governmental agreement between the Welsh Government and the UK Government. The Cabinet Secretary feels frustrated - her words - about the lack of progress on this matter, but this is a natural result when we've had to accept the freezing of our powers as a result of the vote in this place on the EU withdrawal Bill. The United Kingdom Government know they can drive the agenda when things affect Wales without having to take any notice of what we say. Now, turning to recommendation 8, and the Welsh Government committing 'to a national target of 20% urban tree canopy cover', we've heard a great deal about these targets on trees. I won't rehearse the same figures, but trees can reduce carbon and air pollution. The Welsh Government is falling far behind in terms of planting more trees, and it's a cause of disappointment that the Welsh Government has rejected recommendation 8 to pursue this target of planting more trees. It should be a natural requirement of Government to take action and accept recommendation 8, particularly remembering the requirements of the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015. Turning to recommendation 13 in this paper - 'The Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Transport should review the Active Travel (Wales) Act 2013' - clearly, as others have said, transport is an area where a significant decrease could be made in carbon emissions and it could help to reduce air pollution as well. Now, in debates and questions before today in this Chamber, we've heard some talking about how insufficient the Welsh Government response has been to taking action on the Active Travel (Wales) Act 2013. It's of course a disappointment, therefore, that this recommendation, recommendation 13, that the Cabinet Secretary for the Economy and Transport - the Cabinet Secretary will have to tell her colleague about this - should 'report back to the Committee within 6 months' on how the review of implementation of the Active Travel (Wales) Act is coming along. This recommendation again has only been accepted in principle; it's not been accepted that we need a review - it's only been accepted in principle. After everything, that's a matter of disappointment. Almost five years have elapsed since this Act was passed. The rates of active travel are the same, and fewer children are cycling and walking to school. To conclude, the Welsh Government provides £60 million over three years under this Act - about £10 per head per year - which is significantly less than the recommendation of the economy committee of £17 to £20 per head per year. Compare that with a cost of £1.4 billion for the M4 black route. These are the significant challenges. Thank you.
Welsh: Bydd y cynllun a fydd yn dilyn y cynllun masnachu allyriadau Ewropeaidd yma yn chwarae rôl allweddol felly yn sut bydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn cyrraedd eu targedau lleihau allyriadau. Mae'n fater o siom, felly, bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi derbyn argymhelliad 5 ond mewn egwyddor - yr hen dric yna o dderbyn pethau mewn egwyddor eto yn lle jest eu derbyn nhw a mynd amdani. Nawr, mae cynllun masnachu allyriadau'r Undeb Ewropeaidd yn un o'r 24 maes datganoledig sy'n disgyn o dan y trafodaethau a fframweithiau cyffredin dan adain y cytundeb rhynglywodraethol rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru a Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig. Mae'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet yn teimlo'n rhwystredig - eu geiriau hi - am y diffyg cynnydd yn y mater yma, ond mae hyn yn ganlyniad naturiol pan ydym ni wedi gorfod derbyn rhewi ein pwerau o ganlyniad i bleidlais yn y lle yma ar Fil ymadael Ewrop. Mae Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig yn gwybod y gallant yrru'r agenda pan fo pethau'n effeithio ar Gymru heb orfod cymryd sylw o unrhyw beth rydym ni'n ei ddweud. A throi at argymhelliad 8 - 'ymrwymo i darged cenedlaethol o 20 y cant o orchudd canopi coed trefol' - rydym ni wedi clywed cryn dipyn am y targedau coed. Af i ddim dros yr un un ffigurau, ond gall goed leihau carbon a lleihau llygredd awyr, yn amlwg. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn bell ar ei hôl hi yn nhermau plannu rhagor o goed, ac mae'n fater o siom eto bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gwrthod argymhelliad 8 i fynd ar ôl y targed yma o blannu rhagor o goed. Dylai fod rheidrwydd naturiol ar Lywodraeth i weithredu a derbyn argymhelliad 8, yn enwedig o gofio gofyniadau Deddf Llesiant Cenedlaethau'r Dyfodol (Cymru) 2015. Gan droi at argymhelliad 13 yn y cyflwyniad swmpus yma - 'Dylai Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros yr Economi a Thrafnidiaeth adolygu Deddf Teithio Llesol (Cymru) ' - yn amlwg, fel mae eraill wedi'i ddweud, mae trafnidiaeth yn faes lle gellir gwneud lleihad sylweddol mewn allyriadau carbon a helpu lleihau llygredd awyr hefyd ar yr un pryd. Eisoes, mewn dadleuon a chwestiynau cyn heddiw yn y Siambr yma, rydym ni wedi clywed rhai yn olrhain pa mor annigonol ydy ymateb Llywodraeth Cymru wedi bod i weithredu Deddf Teithio Llesol (Cymru) 2013. Mae'n fater o siom, felly, fod yr argymhelliad yma, argymhelliad 13, y dylai'r Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros yr Economi a Thrafnidiaeth - bydd yn rhaid i'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet ddweud wrth ei chyfaill am hyn - 'adrodd yn ôl i'r Pwyllgor o fewn 6 mis' ar sut mae'n dod i adolygu gweithredu Deddf Teithio Llesol (Cymru) - . Mae'r argymhelliad hwn dim ond eto wedi ei dderbyn mewn egwyddor; nid yw wedi'i dderbyn bod angen adolygiad - dim ond wedi ei dderbyn mewn egwyddor. Wedi'r cwbl, mae hynny'n fater o siom. Mae bron i bum mlynedd wedi pasio ers pasio'r Ddeddf yma. Erys graddfeydd teithio llesol yr un peth, ac mae llai o blant yn cerdded neu'n seiclo i'r ysgol. I gloi, rŵan, mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn darparu £60 miliwn dros dair blynedd o dan y Ddeddf yma - tua £10 y pen y flwyddyn - sydd yn sylweddol llai nag argymhelliad pwyllgor economi'r Cynulliad yma o £17 i £20 y pen bob blwyddyn. Cymharer hynny efo cost o £1.4 biliwn am lwybr du'r M4. Erys heriau sylweddol. Diolch yn fawr.