English: Can I thank the Counsel General for his statement? I applaud the Welsh Government's preparation for a number of Brexit scenarios. It is both prudent and sensible. But, Counsel General, you continue to bemoan the fact that, after four years, you have come down to the last few days, but how much is that down to the stance of the remainers, including you and the Welsh Government, by your continually trying to undermine the people's democratic decision in June 2016? This stance has undeniably undermined the efforts of the UK negotiators in getting the EU to accept a reasonable and acceptable Brexit deal. There are three crucial areas said to be the main stumbling blocks to a deal. So, earlier today, I called for a Welsh Government statement of what concessions it would make in order to avoid a 'no deal' scenario with the European Union. Given that I had no real answer to my questions, I make no apology for repeating those questions now: what concessions would the Welsh Government be willing to make in order to avoid a 'no deal' scenario? Would it be to concede on our fishing grounds - which, incidentally, are at this moment being plundered by giant French, Dutch and Spanish trawlers, dredging up to 250 tonnes of fish a day, with disastrous environmental consequences - or would it be to give way on the so-called level playing field, meaning, of course, that the UK Government would, amongst other crucial economic interventions, remain very restricted by state-aid rules, disallowing us from helping our steel industries in the way we would want, or would it be to give the European Court of Justice supremacy over UK law, something that the people who voted for Brexit were implacably against? Please, Counsel General, no obfuscations, just a straight answer to the questions.
Welsh: A gaf i ddiolch i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol am ei ddatganiad? Rwy'n cymeradwyo gwaith paratoi Llywodraeth Cymru ar gyfer nifer o senarios Brexit. Mae hynny'n rhywbeth darbodus a synhwyrol. Ond, Cwnsler Cyffredinol, rydych chi'n parhau i alaru'r ffaith eich bod chi, ar ôl pedair blynedd, wedi cyrraedd y dyddiau olaf, ond faint o hynny sy'n deillio o safbwynt y rhai nad oedd yn dymuno Brexit o gwbl, gan eich cynnwys chi a Llywodraeth Cymru, drwy geisio tanseilio'n barhaus benderfyniad democrataidd y bobl ym mis Mehefin 2016 yn barhaus? Mae'n anochel bod y safiad hwn wedi tanseilio ymdrechion negodwyr y DU i gael yr UE i dderbyn cytundeb Brexit rhesymol a derbyniol. Fe ddywedir bod tri maes hollbwysig yn brif rwystrau i gytundeb. Felly, yn gynharach heddiw, fe alwais i am ddatganiad gan Lywodraeth Cymru ynglŷn â pha gyfaddawdau y byddai'n rhaid eu gwneud i osgoi sefyllfa 'heb gytundeb' gyda'r Undeb Ewropeaidd. O ystyried na chefais i ateb gwirioneddol i'm cwestiynau, nid wyf yn ymddiheuro am ailadrodd y cwestiynau hynny nawr: pa gyfaddawdau y byddai Llywodraeth Cymru yn barod i'w gwneud i osgoi sefyllfa 'heb gytundeb'? A fyddai hynny'n golygu cyfaddawdu o ran ein pysgodfeydd - sydd, gyda llaw, ar hyn o bryd yn cael eu dihysbyddu gan longau enfawr o Ffrainc, yr Iseldiroedd a Sbaen, gan dynnu rhwydi hyd at 250 tunnell o bysgod y dydd, â chanlyniadau amgylcheddol trychinebus - neu a fyddai'n cyfaddawdu ar y maes chwarae gwastad fel y'i gelwir, sy'n golygu, wrth gwrs, y byddai Llywodraeth y DU, ymhlith ymyriadau economaidd hanfodol eraill, yn parhau i fod yn gyfyngedig iawn oherwydd rheolau cymorth gwladwriaethol, gan ein rhwystro ni rhag helpu ein diwydiannau dur yn y ffordd y byddem yn ei dymuno, neu a fyddai'n cyfaddawdu drwy gadw at oruchafiaeth Llys Cyfiawnder Ewrop dros gyfraith y DU, sef rhywbeth yr oedd y bobl a bleidleisiodd o blaid Brexit yn ei wrthwynebu? A fyddech chi, Cwnsler Cyffredinol, gystal â rhoi ateb syml i'r cwestiynau, heb unrhyw ddryswch.