English: Well, thank you for that and, yes, I do agree with the recommendation. Of course, the recommendation was made within the context of the further devolution of justice. I'd also perhaps reaffirm the comments that you made with regard to the impact of cuts to legal aid. This is something I've raised nearly every time I've had meetings with relevant judiciary and law officers. It's a matter that is regularly raised in this particular Chamber, because we have, effectively, I believe, a two-tier justice system now: a justice system for those who can afford it and very little justice for those who can't. We as a Welsh Government have stepped in with resources that were not intended for this in terms of the single advice fund that the Minister for Social Justice was referring to earlier, how important that is, but it is not a substitute for a properly funded justice system and a properly funded legal aid system. I hope, though, that the single advice fund and the investment that we are making into that support provides the base for the establishment eventually of a Welsh legal aid fund. I think it is also worth referring to the comments that have been made recently by the previous Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland, who basically talked about the way in which justice has been underinvested for decades, and I agree with that and I think the cuts in respect of legal aid were almost the worst example of that. But there is no doubt that there has been a long-term failure to evaluate the importance of the justice system and that the justice system is ultimately about the empowerment of people in our communities. So, I think it is another matter that comes back to a point that was made earlier in terms of the commission and the need for the review that is likely to be taking place.
Welsh: Wel, diolch am hynny, ac ydw, rwy'n cytuno â'r argymhelliad. Wrth gwrs, gwnaed yr argymhelliad yng nghyd-destun datganoli cyfiawnder ymhellach. Hefyd, efallai, hoffwn ailddatgan y sylwadau a wnaethoch mewn perthynas ag effaith toriadau i gymorth cyfreithiol. Mae hyn yn rhywbeth a godwyd gennyf bron bob tro y cefais gyfarfod gyda swyddogion y gyfraith a'r farnwriaeth berthnasol. Mae'n fater sy'n cael ei godi'n rheolaidd yn y Siambr hon, gan fod gennym, i bob pwrpas, system gyfiawnder ddwy haen bellach: system gyfiawnder i'r rheini a all ei fforddio a fawr iawn o gyfiawnder i'r rheini na allant ei fforddio. Rydym ni fel Llywodraeth Cymru wedi camu i'r adwy gydag adnoddau nas bwriadwyd ar gyfer hyn gyda'r gronfa gynghori sengl y cyfeiriodd y Gweinidog Cyfiawnder Cymdeithasol ati'n gynharach, pwysigrwydd honno, ond nid yw'n cymryd lle system gyfiawnder a ariennir yn briodol a system gymorth cyfreithiol a ariennir yn briodol. Rwy'n gobeithio, serch hynny, fod y gronfa gynghori sengl a'r buddsoddiad a wnawn yn y cymorth hwnnw'n darparu'r sylfaen ar gyfer sefydlu cronfa cymorth cyfreithiol i Gymru yn y pen draw. Credaf ei bod hefyd yn werth cyfeirio at y sylwadau a wnaed yn ddiweddar gan y cyn-Arglwydd Ganghellor, Robert Buckland, a soniodd, yn y bôn, am y ffordd y tanfuddsoddwyd mewn cyfiawnder ers degawdau, ac rwy'n cytuno â hynny, a chredaf mai'r toriadau mewn perthynas â chymorth cyfreithiol oedd yr enghraifft waethaf, bron iawn, o hynny. Ond nid oes unrhyw amheuaeth y bu methiant hirdymor i werthuso pwysigrwydd y system gyfiawnder a bod y system gyfiawnder, yn y pen draw, yn ymwneud â grymuso pobl yn ein cymunedau. Felly, credaf ei fod yn fater arall sy'n gysylltiedig â phwynt a wnaed yn gynharach mewn perthynas â'r comisiwn a'r angen am yr adolygiad sy'n debygol o ddigwydd.