English: But I think that the broader points are really important in terms of having that wider conversation about the powers that are available to us here in Wales, and what an improved set of powers might look like. I think that that is a discussion that is ongoing. It's very live. The Institute of Welsh Affairs is doing some really interesting work at the moment in that kind of space, to try and draw other people and other voices into that conversation, which I think is really to be welcomed. In terms of the Welsh rates of income tax, I think that the First Minister wasn't being coy today. I think that he was just setting it out honestly, in the sense that we have been really clear that we have got an established process in relation to Welsh rates of income tax, which goes on every single year. That is to consider Welsh rates of income tax, and to consider the role that Welsh rates of income tax have to play in funding public services here in Wales, and then we announce those decisions alongside the draft budget. Just to continue the discussion that was ongoing between the First Minister and the leader of Plaid Cymru earlier on today, in respect of Welsh rates of income tax, I know that there was some interest in the amount that could be raised through higher rates and additional rates, in particular. Well, we'll start with the basic rate, and this is the figure that gets quoted quite frequently within the Chamber: that would raise around £220 million. But then the higher rate - and this is if you raised it by one penny - would raise around £30 million, and then just £4 million if you were to raise the additional rate. So, I think that that just helps to give some useful context, really, for the kinds of decisions that we will have to make, and the kinds of choices available to us. But just being completely honest: no decisions have been taken. I do think that the UK Government's u-turn on income tax has now changed the context for those decisions, but we will be having those discussions as we move towards the publication of the draft budget on 13 December. It is my intention to stay with the date of 13 December, because it does respect the protocol that we have with the Finance Committee. But also, I think that I have to tell people that this is going to be the most difficult budget that we will have set since devolution, in the sense that we are looking already at a budget that is worth £1.5 billion less next year. That's before any cuts that are announced either on 31 October or in a forthcoming spring statement. So, this is going to be a budget where we are looking again at our programme for government, we are looking again at our priorities and so on. It could potentially be a budget where we are forced to cut main expenditure groups or programmes and so on. So, I think that that is a good reason why we need time to do that work as a Government. It's often the case that we are asked to allow greater time for scrutiny than we have even to prepare a budget. I just want to describe the sheer amount of work that goes in to developing a budget, in terms of those commissions that go out to every single one of my colleagues. We have a round of bilaterals with each single one of my ministerial colleagues. All of their departments will be looking at all of their programmes and trying to look to see what could be done differently, where the pressures are, and so on. So, these things do take weeks and weeks and weeks to do, and when we are looking at a budget that is about cutting rather than allocating, it just makes the job even harder. So, I just wanted to say to colleagues that this is the reason why we need time to undertake this work. [ Interruption. ] And yes, I agree that the scrutiny role is really important as well, but the timetable that we do set out does respect that scrutiny role. So, in terms of the other points raised: yes, I will certainly take forward the specific points that you wanted raised with the UK Government around off-grid support, for example, and I share the concerns about the announcement of the energy cap being removed as of April. I think that that will only cause a lot of worry now for households in Wales who need a greater degree of certainty to plan for the period ahead. The UK Government has said that it is instituting a review of the energy support, and we have been really clear that that review has to start and conclude very quickly. The UK Government, in the meeting yesterday, was quite open that we can be involved fully in that review and have input into that review. It's Treasury led, but I think they were - . Potentially because it was our first meeting, they started off in a very collegiate way, wanting to be open and transparent. So, I thought that it seemed like a good place where we could potentially work together to start off with, and that would be a chance for us to set out exactly what our constituents will be feeling as a result of the situation at the moment, and also the lack of ability for businesses and public services to plan ahead in this space as well.
Welsh: Ond rwy'n credu bod y pwyntiau ehangach yn bwysig iawn o ran cael y sgwrs fwy eang honno am y pwerau sydd ar gael i ni yma yng Nghymru, a sut olwg fyddai ar gyfres well o bwerau. Rwy'n credu bod honno'n drafodaeth sy'n parhau. Mae hi'n gyfredol iawn. Mae'r Sefydliad Materion Cymreig yn gwneud gwaith hynod ddiddorol ar hyn o bryd mewn maes fel hwn, i geisio tynnu pobl eraill a lleisiau eraill i mewn i'r sgwrs honno, rhywbeth sydd wir i'w groesawu yn fy marn i. O ran cyfraddau treth incwm Cymru, nid wyf i o'r farn bod y Prif Weinidog yn osgoi heddiw. Rwy'n credu ei fod ef wedi gwneud dim ond nodi yn onest, yn yr ystyr y bu ni'n eglur iawn ein bod ni â phroses sefydledig o ran cyfraddau treth incwm i Gymru, sy'n parhau pob un flwyddyn. A honno yw ystyried cyfraddau Cymru o'r dreth incwm, ac ystyried y gwaith y mae'n rhaid i gyfraddau treth incwm Cymru ei wneud wrth ariannu gwasanaethau cyhoeddus yma yng Nghymru, ac yna fe gyhoeddwn ni'r penderfyniadau hynny ochr yn ochr â'r gyllideb ddrafft. Dim ond i barhau â'r drafodaeth a oedd yn digwydd rhwng y Prif Weinidog ac arweinydd Plaid Cymru yn gynharach heddiw, ynglŷn â chyfraddau treth incwm i Gymru, fe wn i fod rhywfaint o ddiddordeb yn y swm y gellid ei godi drwy gyfraddau uwch a chyfraddau ychwanegol, yn arbennig felly. Wel, fe fyddwn ni'n dechrau gyda'r gyfradd sylfaenol, a dyma'r ffigwr sy'n cael ei ddyfynnu'n aml iawn yn y Siambr: fe fyddai hynny'n codi tua £220 miliwn. Ond wedyn fe fyddai'r gyfradd uwch - a pe byddech chi'n codi un geiniog yw hyn - yn codi oddeutu £30 miliwn, ac yna dim ond £4 miliwn pe byddech chi'n codi'r gyfradd ychwanegol. Felly, rwy'n credu bod hynny'n ein helpu ni ychydig wrth roi rhyw gyd-destun defnyddiol, mewn gwirionedd, ar gyfer y mathau o benderfyniadau y bydd yn rhaid i ni eu gwneud, a'r mathau o ddewisiadau sydd ar gael i ni. Ond dim ond i fod yn gwbl onest: nid oes unrhyw benderfyniadau wedi eu gwneud. Rwy'n credu bod tro pedol Llywodraeth y DU ynglŷn â'r dreth incwm wedi newid y cyd-destun ar gyfer y penderfyniadau hynny erbyn hyn, ond fe fyddwn ni'n cynnal y trafodaethau hynny wrth i ni symud tuag at gyhoeddiad y gyllideb ddrafft ar 13 o fis Rhagfyr. Fy mwriad yw aros gyda dyddiad y 13 o fis Rhagfyr, oherwydd mae hwnnw'n parchu'r protocol sydd gennym ni gyda'r Pwyllgor Cyllid. Ond hefyd, rwy'n credu bod yn rhaid i mi ddweud wrth bobl mai hon fydd y gyllideb anoddaf y gwnaethom ni ei phennu ers datganoli, yn yr ystyr ein bod ni'n edrych yn barod ar gyllideb sydd werth £1.5 biliwn yn llai'r flwyddyn nesaf. Mae hynny cyn unrhyw doriadau sy'n cael eu cyhoeddi naill ai ar 31 o fis Hydref neu mewn datganiad gwanwyn sydd ar ddod. Felly, fe fydd hon yn gyllideb lle rydym ni'n edrych eto ar ein rhaglen lywodraethu ni, rydym ni'n ailystyried ein blaenoriaethau ni ac yn y blaen. Mae hi'n bosibl y gallai hon fod yn gyllideb lle byddwn ni'n cael ein gorfodi i dorri prif grwpiau neu raglenni gwariant ac yn y blaen ynddi hi. Felly, rwyf i o'r farn fod hynny'n rheswm da pam mae angen amser i wneud y gwaith yna yn y Llywodraeth. Mae hi'n wir yn aml ein bod ni'n cael ein gofyn i ganiatáu mwy o amser ar gyfer craffu nag ar gyfer paratoi'r gyllideb hyd yn oed. Fe hoffwn i ddisgrifio'r gwaith mawr sy'n digwydd wrth ddatblygu cyllideb, o ran y comisiynau hynny sy'n mynd allan i bob un o fy nghydweithwyr. Mae cyfres o gyfarfodydd dwyochrog gyda phob un o fy nghydweithwyr gweinidogol. Bydd eu hadrannau nhw i gyd yn edrych ar eu rhaglenni nhw ac yn ceisio ystyried beth a ellid ei wneud yn wahanol, lle mae'r pwysau, ac yn y blaen. Felly, mae'r pethau hyn yn cymryd wythnosau lawer i'w gwneud, a phan rydym ni'n ystyried cyllideb sy'n ymwneud â thoriadau yn hytrach na dyraniadau, mae hynny'n gwneud y dasg yn anoddach fyth. Felly, roeddwn i'n awyddus i ddweud wrth gydweithwyr mai hwnnw yw'r rheswm pam mae angen amser arnom ni i ymgymryd â'r gwaith hwn. [ Torri ar draws. ] Ac ydw, rwy'n cytuno bod y gwaith craffu yn bwysig iawn hefyd, ond mae'r amserlen yr ydym ni'n ei nodi yn parchu'r gwaith craffu hwnnw. Felly, o ran y pwyntiau eraill a godwyd: ie, rwy'n sicr am fwrw ymlaen â'r pwyntiau penodol yr oeddech chi'n awyddus i'w codi gyda Llywodraeth y DU ynglŷn â chefnogaeth oddi ar y grid, er enghraifft, ac rwy'n rhannu'r pryderon am gyhoeddi dileu'r cap ynni o fis Ebrill. Rwy'n credu y bydd hynny ond yn achosi llawer o ofid i aelwydydd yng Nghymru nawr sydd angen mwy o sicrwydd i gynllunio ar gyfer y cyfnod sydd i ddod. Mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi dweud eu bod nhw am sefydlu adolygiad o'r cymorth gydag ynni, ac fe fuom ni'n eglur iawn bod yn rhaid i'r adolygiad hwnnw ddechrau a gorffen yn gyflym iawn. Roedd Llywodraeth y DU, yn y cyfarfod ddoe, yn eithaf agored y gallwn ni fod yn rhan lawn o'r adolygiad hwnnw a bod â mewnbwn i'r adolygiad hwnnw. Y Trysorlys fydd yn ei arwain, ond rwy'n credu eu bod nhw - . O bosibl oherwydd mai dyma oedd ein cyfarfod cyntaf ni, fe wnaethon nhw ddechrau mewn ffordd golegaidd iawn, gan ddymuno bod yn agored a thryloyw. Felly, roeddwn i o'r farn ei bod hi'n ymddangos yn gyfle da i ni allu gweithio gyda'n gilydd i ddechrau o bosibl, ac fe fyddai hwnnw'n gyfle i ni nodi yn hollol yr hyn y mae ein hetholwyr ni'n ei deimlo o ganlyniad i'r sefyllfa bresennol, a'r diffyg sydd o ran gallu i fusnesau a gwasanaethau cyhoeddus gynllunio ymlaen llaw yn y sefyllfa hon hefyd.