English: You say that you've had a more cautious approach for health reasons, but I've just cited at least two examples where there hasn't been a cautious approach, certainly on face coverings and when it came to the testing of care home residents and staff. So, it's not true to say that you've had a more cautious approach, certainly in respect of those two things. And I ask you again: what assessment has the Welsh Government made of the longer term impact on people's health as a result of your longer lockdown? Because we all know that poorer nations tend to have poorer outcomes in terms of the health of their populations, and I fear that you're making a mess of the economic recovery that could be because of your longer lockdown. Now, I accept, I fully accept, that you've got to strike the right balance between health concerns and economic concerns, but I'm afraid there hasn't been any balance so far, and certainly not when it comes to your expert panel here in Wales. The membership of your panel, of course, consists of Gordon Brown, the former Chancellor and Prime Minister responsible for putting the country into the worst possible position during the 2008 economic downturn, only hobbling on then to a recovery after almost bankrupting the country; a former adviser to Ed Miliband, who was the brainchild behind the 'Ed stone', or 'the tombstone' as it came to be known, who now leads a left-leaning think tank; and, of course, the leader of a hard-left socialist think tank that has advocated a 21-hour working week, scrapping the measurement of GDP in terms of economic growth, and in fact has said that economic growth isn't actually possible. So, we've got a former Prime Minister and Chancellor responsible for the biggest boom and bust that our country had ever seen, a former special adviser, and a socialist who doesn't even believe in economic growth. How on earth is that going to help this country bounce back in the way that my party wants to see it bounce back as a result of this pandemic?
Welsh: Rydych chi'n dweud y buoch chi'n fwy gofalus am resymau iechyd, ond rwyf newydd ddyfynnu o leiaf dwy enghraifft lle na fu dull gofalus, yn sicr o ran gorchuddion wyneb ac o ran profi preswylwyr a staff cartrefi gofal. Felly, nid yw'n wir i ddweud yr aethoch chi ati mewn ffordd fwy pwyllog, yn sicr o ran y ddau beth hynny. Ac rwy'n gofyn i chi eto: pa asesiad y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi'i wneud o'r effaith tymor hwy ar iechyd pobl o ganlyniad i'ch cyfyngiadau symud hirach? Oherwydd rydym ni i gyd yn gwybod bod gwledydd tlotach yn tueddu i fod â chanlyniadau gwaeth o ran iechyd eu poblogaethau, ac ofnaf eich bod yn gwneud llanast o'r adferiad economaidd a allai fod oherwydd eich cyfyngiadau symud hirach. Nawr, rwy'n derbyn, rwy'n derbyn yn llwyr, bod yn rhaid i chi daro'r cydbwysedd cywir rhwng pryderon iechyd a phryderon economaidd, ond rwy'n ofni na fu unrhyw gydbwysedd hyd yn hyn, ac yn sicr nid o ran eich panel arbenigol yma yng Nghymru. Mae aelodaeth eich panel, wrth gwrs, yn cynnwys Gordon Brown, y cyn-Ganghellor a'r Prif Weinidog sy'n gyfrifol am roi'r wlad yn y sefyllfa waethaf bosib yn ystod dirywiad economaidd 2008, gan ddim ond hercian yn ôl i adferiad wedi bron iawn â gwneud y wlad yn fethdalwr; cyn-gynghorwr i Ed Miliband, a'r un a feddyliodd am 'Garreg Ed', neu 'y garreg fedd' fel y daethpwyd i'w hadnabod, sydd bellach yn arwain melin drafod sy'n gogwyddo tua'r chwith; ac, wrth gwrs, arweinydd melin drafod sosialaidd sydd ar bellafoedd yr adain chwith sydd wedi dadlau dros wythnos waith 21 awr, cael gwared ar fesur GDP o ran twf economaidd, ac yn wir wedi dweud nad yw twf economaidd yn bosibl mewn gwirionedd. Felly, mae gennym ni gyn-Brif Weinidog a Changhellor a oedd yn gyfrifol am y ffyniant a'r methiant mwyaf a welodd ein gwlad erioed, cyn-gynghorydd arbennig, a sosialydd nad yw hyd yn oed yn credu mewn twf economaidd. Sut ar y ddaear y mae hynny'n mynd i helpu'r wlad hon ailgodi yn y ffordd y mae fy mhlaid eisiau ei gweld yn ailgodi o ganlyniad i'r pandemig hwn?