techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: It's the first time you've declared your support for the motion. Do you not accept that if you say that there is no circumstance under which we would leave without a deal, the EU would then have the UK over a barrel, because we would accept anything that we are given because we've ruled out the one thing that we've got at our disposal - to be able to get up and walk away and say, 'Forget it, it's not good enough'?
Welsh: Dyma'r tro cyntaf i chi ddatgan eich cefnogaeth i'r cynnig. Os ydych yn dweud nad oes unrhyw amgylchiadau y byddem yn gadael heb gytundeb, onid ydych yn derbyn y byddai'r UE wedyn yn dal y DU ar gledr ei law, oherwydd byddem yn derbyn unrhyw beth a roddir inni am ein bod wedi diystyru'r un peth sydd gennym at ein defnydd - gallu codi a cherdded ymaith a dweud, 'Anghofiwch amdano, nid yw'n ddigon da'?
English: Isn't that absolutely bizarre? The idea that we're all in agreement that going out with no deal would be disastrous and we're not prepared to say it. The writing is on the wall; it is disastrous. We're not deluding anyone, we're not conning the EU over this. We know that a 'no deal' is a disaster and no-one in their right mind wants to go down the 'no deal' road. And that is the problem, because -
Welsh: Onid yw hynny'n hollol hurt? Y syniad ein bod i gyd yn cytuno y byddai gadael heb gytundeb yn drychinebus ac nad ydym yn barod i ddweud hynny. Mae'r ysgrifen ar y mur; mae'n drychinebus. Nid ydym yn twyllo neb, nid ydym yn twyllo'r UE ynglŷn â hyn. Gwyddom fod 'dim bargen' yn drychinebus ac nid oes neb yn ei iawn bwyll eisiau dilyn llwybr 'dim bargen'. A dyna'r broblem, oherwydd -
English: No, no, I've taken two. That is the real problem, because what is actually happening from the Conservative side is that this is about protecting the interests of the Conservative Party because Theresa May will not face up to the reality of the political situation that she is in. If she had any decency whatsoever, she would do the decent thing, to recognise the historic defeat that she has had and be prepared to go out and trust the people and have a general election.
Welsh: Na, na, rwyf wedi derbyn dau. Dyna'r broblem go iawn, oherwydd yr hyn sy'n digwydd mewn gwirionedd o ochr y Ceidwadwyr yw bod hyn yn ymwneud â diogelu buddiannau'r Blaid Geidwadol am na wnaiff Theresa May wynebu realiti'r sefyllfa wleidyddol y mae ynddi. Pe bai ganddi unrhyw wyleidd-dra o gwbl, byddai'n gwneud y peth iawn, sef cydnabod y grasfa hanesyddol a gafodd a pharatoi i fynd at y bobl ac ymddiried ynddynt, a chael etholiad cyffredinol.
English: Will the Member give way? Will the Member give way? He says 'whatever the outcome' of this. The outcome was that Wales voted to leave the European Union. The problem is that people such as himself do not want to implement that result and are doing everything possible to frustrate it. By saying, 'We have to leave whatever; we won't accept "no deal"', you have to accept whatever they give you. But that's what you want, because you want to stay in and frustrate the people of Wales and what they decided.
Welsh: A wnaiff yr Aelod ildio? A wnaiff yr Aelod ildio? Mae'n dweud 'beth bynnag fydd canlyniad' hyn. Y canlyniad oedd bod Cymru wedi pleidleisio i adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd. Y broblem yw nad yw pobl debyg iddo ef eisiau gweithredu'r canlyniad hwnnw a gwnânt bopeth sy'n bosibl i'w rwystro. Drwy ddweud, 'Mae'n rhaid inni adael beth bynnag; ni wnawn dderbyn Brexit "dim bargen" ', rhaid ichi dderbyn beth bynnag y byddant yn ei roi i chi. Ond dyna rydych chi ei eisiau, oherwydd rydych chi eisiau aros yn yr UE a rhwystro pobl Cymru a'r hyn y maent wedi ei benderfynu.
English: You're too late. We have UKIP Members who can't decide whether they want to intervene. We have former UKIP Members arriving after the opening speeches have been made with no respect to the comments that have been made earlier. Well, it doesn't work like that. Let's make a stance today, as I'm confident that we will do, and say 'no deal' will not work for Wales. It will not work for our young people in future.
Welsh: Rydych chi'n rhy hwyr. Mae gennym Aelodau UKIP na allant benderfynu a ydynt am ymyrryd. Mae gennym gyn-Aelodau UKIP yn cyrraedd ar ôl i'r areithiau agoriadol gael eu gwneud heb unrhyw barch at y sylwadau a wnaethpwyd yn gynharach. Wel, nid dyna fel y mae'n gweithio. Beth am wneud safiad heddiw, fel rwy'n hyderus y gwnawn, a dweud na fydd Brexit 'dim bargen' yn gweithio i Gymru. Ni fydd yn gweithio i'n pobl ifanc yn y dyfodol.
English: May I thank everyone who's contributed to this colourful debate this afternoon? I think that that, of course, reflects the strong feeling and the increasingly polarised feelings in this debate, and that is a shame, but of course that is the challenge we're facing in terms of finding a way out of this huge conundrum. And Adam Price struck a sobering note at the very outset, giving us a picture of the damage that a 'no deal' Brexit would cause, and he admitted himself that perhaps he is wrong. But if he is wrong, then certainly he won't be the only one, because there are commentators and experts and people working in sectors across the economy, across the UK, who fear and predict the same outcome, as does the Government itself. So, is it a risk worth taking? Well, no it's not, and that is why we as a party have brought this motion forward today. I want to mention the impact on the agricultural industry, because it's a sector that's very close to my heart, and it's one that is of course going to be facing the storms of Brexit more than most other sectors, perhaps.
Welsh: Gaf fi ddiolch yn fawr iawn i bawb sydd wedi cyfrannu i'r ddadl gyffrous yma y prynhawn yma - lliwgar iawn ar adegau? Rydw i'n meddwl bod hynny, wrth gwrs, yn adlewyrchu'r teimladau cryfion a'r teimladau sydd yn gynyddol gael eu polareiddio yn y drafodaeth hynny. Mae hynny yn biti, ond wrth gwrs dyna yw'r her rŷn ni'n ei hwynebu, o safbwynt ffeindio ffordd allan o'r dryswch mawr yma. Ac mi wnaeth Adam Price daro nodyn sobreiddiol reit ar y cychwyn, yn rhoi darlun inni o'r difrod y bydd Brexit heb gytundeb yn ei achosi, ac yn cyfaddef ei hunan efallai ei fod e'n anghywir, ond os ydy e'n anghywir, wel, nid fe fydd yr unig un sy'n anghywir, oherwydd mae yna sylwebwyr ac arbenigwyr a phobl yn gweithio mewn sectorau ar draws yr economi, ar draws y Deyrnas Unedig, sydd yn ofni ac yn rhagdybio'r un canlyniad, a'r Llywodraeth ei hunan hefyd. Felly, ydy e'n risg sy'n werth ei chymryd? Wel, nac ydy, a dyna pam, wrth gwrs, ŷn ni fel plaid wedi dod â'r cynnig yma gerbron heddiw. Dwi eisiau sôn ychydig am yr impact ar y diwydiant amaeth, oherwydd mae'n sector sy'n agos iawn at fy nghalon i, ac mae e'n un, wrth gwrs, sydd yn mynd i fod yn wynebu rhyferthwy Brexit yn fwy, efallai, na nifer fawr, neu'r rhelyw o sectorau eraill.
English: And some of the farming concerns have been well rehearsed, of course, but particularly recently in the UK farming round-table, where a number of the major and immediate impacts of a potential 'no deal' Brexit were aired. We know, for example, that there could be huge implications for animal-based products such as meat, eggs and dairy that are being exported currently to the EU. They will only import from approved countries, and it could take months for us, of course, under a 'no deal' scenario to achieve such status. And the impact for our lamb sector in Wales particularly, along with others, doesn't bear thinking about. Export tariffs have been referred to. What does that really mean? Well, it could be imposed on 60 per cent of UK food, feed and drink that goes to the EU, increasing export tariffs to an average of 27 per cent on chicken, 46 per cent on lamb, 65 per cent on beef. These are the figures that we're talking about, and I can see Mr Hamilton on his feet. Go on.
Welsh: Ac mae rhai o'r pryderon ynglŷn â ffermio wedi'u trafod droeon, wrth gwrs, ond yn fwyaf diweddar yn y drafodaeth bwrdd crwn ar ffermio yn y DU, lle y gwyntyllwyd nifer sylweddol o effeithiau mwyaf a mwyaf uniongyrchol Brexit 'dim bargen' posibl. Gwyddom, er enghraifft, y gallai fod goblygiadau enfawr i gynhyrchion anifeiliaid megis cig, wyau a llaeth sy'n cael eu hallforio i'r UE ar hyn o bryd. Ni fyddant ond yn mewnforio o wledydd cymeradwy, a gallai gymryd misoedd i ni gyrraedd statws o'r fath mewn senario 'dim bargen', wrth gwrs. Ac mae'r effaith ar ein sector cig oen yn enwedig yng Nghymru yn peri pryder mawr. Cyfeiriwyd at y tariffau allforio. Beth y mae hynny'n ei olygu mewn gwirionedd? Wel, gellid eu gosod ar 60 y cant o fwyd y DU, bwyd a diod sy'n mynd i'r UE, cynyddu tariff allforio i gyfartaledd o 27 y cant ar gyw iâr, 46 y cant ar gig oen, 65 y cant ar gig eidion. Dyma'r ffigurau rydym yn sôn amdanynt, a gallaf weld Mr Hamilton ar ei draed. Ewch chi.
English: But we're massive net importers of all these products, apart from lamb. [ Interruption.] Apart from lamb, where we import as much as we export - trade is in balance. We're massive net importers, so the vicious tariffs of the EU will apply to their sales to us as much as our sales to them, so they will be the ones who will lose more than us.
Welsh: Ond rydym yn fewnforwyr net anferth o'r holl gynhyrchion hyn, ar wahân i gig oen. [ Torri ar draws.] Ar wahân i gig oen, lle y mewnforiwn gymaint ag a allforiwn - mae yna gydbwysedd masnach. Rydym yn fewnforwyr net anferth, felly bydd tariffau milain yr UE yn gymwys i'w gwerthiannau hwy i ni lawn cymaint â'n gwerthiannau ni iddynt hwy, felly byddant hwy fwy ar eu colled na ni.
English: The proposal is to agree the motion without amendment. Does any Member object? [ Objection. ] I will defer voting until voting time.
Welsh: Y cwestiwn yw: a ddylid derbyn y cynnig heb ei ddiwygio? A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? [ Gwrthwynebiad. ] Gohiriaf y bleidlais, felly, tan y cyfnod pleidleisio.
English: That brings us to voting time. Unless three Members wish for the bell to be rung, we'll move immediately to the first vote. That's a vote on the general principles of the Autism (Wales) Bill. I call for a vote on the motion tabled in the name of Paul Davies. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 24, no abstentions, 28 against. Therefore, the motion is not agreed.
Welsh: Daw hyn â ni at y cyfnod pleidleisio. Oni bai fod yna dri Aelod sydd eisiau i fi ganu'r gloch, dyma ni'n symud yn syth at y bleidlais gyntaf. Mae'r bleidlais hynny ar y ddadl ar egwyddorion cyffredinol y Bil Awtistiaeth (Cymru). Dwi'n galw am bleidlais ar y cynnig a gyflwynwyd yn enw Paul Davies. Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid 24, neb yn ymatal, 28 yn erbyn. Felly, gwrthodwyd y cynnig.
English: The next vote is on the Plaid Cymru debate on a 'no deal' Brexit. I call for a vote on the motion tabled in the name of Rhun ap Iorwerth. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 37, no abstentions, 16 against. Therefore, the motion is agreed.
Welsh: Y bleidlais nesaf ar ddadl Plaid Cymru ar Brexit heb gytundeb. Dwi'n galw am bleidlais ar y cynnig heb ei ddiwygio a gyflwynwyd yn enw Rhun ap Iorwerth. Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid 37, neb yn ymatal, 16 yn erbyn. Felly, derbyniwyd y cynnig.
English: And we therefore move on to our next item, which is the short debate. If Members could leave the Chamber quietly so that we can proceed to the short debate.
Welsh: Mae hynny'n golygu ein bod ni'n symud ymlaen at yr eitem nesaf, a'r ddadl fer yw honno. Os gall Aelodau adael y Siambr yn dawel, fe fyddwn ni'n symud ymlaen at y ddadl fer.
English: Can I thank Jack for raising this really important issue of mental health first aid in the workplace? I speak as someone who's had my own mental health problems quite consistently throughout my adult life, and it has impacted in the workplace, there's no doubt about that. I think in an informal way I've been supported and I've struggled through and most of the time I've been in good health. But I do think we need consistent policies, because there are times when people probably are underperforming significantly. I notice that some of the latest estimates on cost to employers run from £33 billion to £42 billion. It's astonishing, and obviously the main thing here is the humanitarian concern about keeping people in the best health possible, but economically it really doesn't make any sense. Unfortunately, the Department of Work and Pensions estimates that up to 300,000 people a year lose their job because of a mental health condition. That's really the scale of the problem. Can I just ask the Minister? I understand that the Welsh Government's mental health strategy did set targets for Public Health Wales to look at this whole issue in the workplace, and they're supposed to report by March 2019, so just coming up. I do think that the NHS, our largest employer in Wales, is really in an excellent position to highlight best practice in how to support employees that have ongoing mental health concerns. Thank you.
Welsh: A gaf fi ddiolch i Jack am godi mater pwysig cymorth cyntaf iechyd meddwl yn y gweithle? Rwy'n siarad fel rhywun sydd wedi cael problemau iechyd meddwl fy hun yn eithaf cyson drwy gydol fy oes fel oedolyn, ac mae wedi cael effaith yn y gweithle, nid oes unrhyw amheuaeth am hynny. Mewn ffordd anffurfiol credaf fy mod wedi cael cefnogaeth ac rwyf wedi brwydro drwyddi a'r rhan fwyaf o'r amser rwyf wedi cael iechyd da. Ond rwy'n credu bod arnom angen polisïau cyson, oherwydd mae yna adegau pan fydd pobl yn tangyflawni'n sylweddol yn ôl pob tebyg. Rwy'n sylwi bod rhai o'r amcangyfrifon diweddaraf o gost i gyflogwyr yn amrywio rhwng £33 biliwn a £42 biliwn. Mae'n rhyfeddol, ac yn amlwg, y prif beth yma yw pryder dyngarol ynglŷn â chadw pobl yn yr iechyd gorau posibl, ond yn economaidd nid yw'n gwneud unrhyw synnwyr o gwbl. Yn anffodus, mae'r Adran Gwaith a Phensiynau yn amcangyfrif bod hyd at 300,000 o bobl y flwyddyn yn colli eu gwaith oherwydd cyflwr iechyd meddwl. Dyna yw maint y broblem mewn gwirionedd. A gaf fi ofyn i'r Gweinidog? Rwy'n deall bod strategaeth iechyd meddwl Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gosod targedau i Iechyd Cyhoeddus Cymru edrych ar yr holl broblem hon yn y gweithle, ac maent i fod i gyflwyno adroddiad erbyn mis Mawrth 2019, felly mae ar y gorwel. Rwy'n credu bod y GIG, ein cyflogwr mwyaf yng Nghymru, mewn sefyllfa ardderchog i dynnu sylw at arferion gorau o ran sut i gefnogi gweithwyr sydd â phroblemau iechyd meddwl parhaus. Diolch.
English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. I want to start by thanking Jack Sargeant for bringing this important short debate topic to the Assembly and also to Members for their contributions in the debate. This is a welcome opportunity to discuss mental health in the workplace, a subject that affects all of us, not just our constituents but all of us, and is recognised as a priority by the Government in our programme for government.
Welsh: Diolch ichi, Ddirprwy Lywydd. Rwyf am ddechrau drwy ddiolch i Jack Sargeant am gyflwyno dadl fer ar y pwnc pwysig hwn i'r Cynulliad ac i'r Aelodau am eu cyfraniadau yn y ddadl. Mae hwn yn gyfle defnyddiol i drafod iechyd meddwl yn y gweithle, pwnc sy'n effeithio ar bob un ohonom, nid ein hetholwyr yn unig, ond pob un ohonom, ac mae'r Llywodraeth yn cydnabod yn ein rhaglen lywodraethu ei fod yn flaenoriaeth.
English: Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the meeting of the Finance Committee this morning. There are headsets available for translation or for sound amplification and could I remind Members to ensure that any electronic devices are on silent? Do any Members have any interests to declare? No. Thank you. Let's move on, therefore, and could I welcome two new Members to the committee: Rhianon Passmore and Alun Davies? Welcome, Rhianon. Alun has sent his apology - he can't join us this morning. We've also received apologies from Neil Hamilton. I would also like to note, of course, the contribution of Steffan Lewis to this committee. He was a member of the committee since his election in 2016 and, even though I didn't have an opportunity to serve on this committee with him, I hear from other Members that his contribution was considerable and very valuable. And our sympathies are extended, of course, to his family and friends at this very difficult time.
Welsh: Bore da, bawb. Croeso i gyfarfod y Pwyllgor Cyllid y bore yma. Mae yna glustffonau ar gael, wrth gwrs, ar gyfer offer cyfieithu neu i addasu lefel y sain, ac a gaf fi atgoffa Aelodau i ddiffodd y sain oddi ar unrhyw ddyfeisiadau electronig? Oes gan unrhyw Aelod unrhyw fuddiannau i'w datgan? Nac oes. Iawn. Diolch yn fawr. Gaf fi felly groesawu dau Aelod newydd i'r pwyllgor: Rhianon Passmore ac Alun Davies? Croeso, Rhianon. Mae Alun yn ymddiheuro - nid yw'n gallu bod gyda ni y bore yma. Rydyn ni hefyd wedi derbyn ymddiheuriad oddi wrth Neil Hamilton. Buaswn i'n licio hefyd nodi cyfraniad Steffan Lewis, wrth gwrs, i'r pwyllgor yma. Fe fuodd yn Aelod o'r pwyllgor ers ei ethol yn 2016 ac, er na ches i'r cyfle i wasanaethu ar y pwyllgor yma gydag e, dwi'n clywed gan Aelodau, wrth gwrs, fod ei gyfraniad e wedi bod yn sylweddol ac yn werthfawr. Ac mae ein cofion, ein cariad a'n cydymdeimlad ni, wrth gwrs, gyda'i deulu a'i ffrindiau fe ar yr adeg anodd iawn yma.
English: We do have some papers to note. The first paper is a response from the Wales Audit Office to the scrutiny that's happened. There's also a letter from Paul Davies on the Autism (Wales) Bill, which we debated yesterday in the Assembly. And, of course, there are the minutes of the meeting held on 9 January. Are Members happy to note those papers? Fine. Thank you very much.
Welsh: Mae gennym ni rai papurau i'w nodi. Y papur cyntaf yw ymateb gan y Swyddfa Archwilio Cymru i'r gwaith craffu sydd wedi bod. Mae yna lythyr hefyd gan Paul Davies ar y Bil Awtistiaeth (Cymru) a fu'n destun dadl yn y Cynulliad ddoe. Ac mae cofnodion cyfarfod a gynhaliwyd ar 9 Ionawr eleni. Ydy Aelodau yn hapus i nodi'r papurau yna? Iawn. Diolch yn fawr iawn i chi.
English: We move on therefore to the main item of the meeting this morning, which is to look at the financial implications of the Legislation (Wales) Bill. Could I welcome Jeremy Miles, the Counsel General, and his officials, Dylan Hughes, First Legislative Counsel for the Welsh Government, and Claire Fife, policy adviser to the Counsel General in the Welsh Government? If it's okay with you, we'll go straight into questions and I will start by just asking you to give a brief outline of the objectives of the Bill, why it's necessary at this point in time, and what activities will deliver its objectives.
Welsh: Ymlaen â ni felly i brif eitem y cyfarfod y bore yma, sef i edrych ar oblygiadau ariannol Bil Deddfwriaeth (Cymru). Gaf fi groesawu Jeremy Miles, y Cwnsler Cyffredinol, a'i swyddogion, Dylan Hughes, sy'n Brif Gwnsler Deddfwriaethol gyda Llywodraeth Cymru, a Claire Fife, sy'n gynghorwr polisi i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol yn Llywodraeth Cymru? Os ydy'n iawn gyda chi, awn ni'n syth mewn i gwestiynau ac mi ddechreuaf fi efallai drwy jest ofyn i chi rhoi amlinelliad byr i ni o amcanion y Bil, pam fod angen y Bil ar hyn o bryd, a pha weithgareddau a fydd yn cyflawni amcanion y Bil.
English: Okay, thank you very much for that overview. The draft regulatory impact assessment that you consulted on included high-level costs, but, from what I understand, you didn't have any direct responses to that aspect, even though there was a specific question that asked for that. So, are you satisfied with the responses that you've had to the financial impact of the Bill?
Welsh: Ocê. Wel, diolch yn fawr iawn am y trosolwg yna. Mi oedd yr asesiad effaith rheoleiddiol drafft, wrth gwrs, roeddech chi wedi ymgynghori arno fe yn cynnwys costau lefel uchel, ond, o beth dwi'n deall, dwi ddim yn credu eich bod chi wedi cael unrhyw ymatebion uniongyrchol i'r agwedd yna, er bod yna gwestiwn penodol hefyd yn gofyn amdano fe. Felly, ŷch chi'n fodlon gyda'r ymatebion rŷch chi wedi eu cael i effaith ariannol y Bil?
English: Well, perhaps this kind of Bill is different to other Bills that make direct changes to the everyday lives of citizens, and that is perhaps the reason for the level of response to that question. On the one hand, you could see that as being disappointing; on the other hand, you could say, 'Well, generally speaking, people don't see it as a priority.' So, I'm sure the answer is somewhere between the two. I think stakeholders will respond to things that are likely to have an impact on their daily lives, and perhaps they don't see that in that specific context.
Welsh: Wel, efallai fod y math yma o Fil yn wahanol i'r mathau sydd yn gwneud newid uniongyrchol ym mywyd bob dydd pobl, ac efallai bod hynny wrth wraidd y lefel o ymateb sydd wedi bod i'r cwestiynau yma. Gallech chi, ar un llaw, fod yn gweld hynny'n beth siomedig; ar y llaw arall, gallwch chi ddweud, 'Wel, ar y cyfan, dyw pobl ddim yn ei weld e fel blaenoriaeth.' Felly, siŵr o fod, 'rhywle yn y canol' yw'r ateb. Rwy'n credu bod rhanddeiliaid yn mynd i ymateb i bethau sydd yn debygol o gael effaith bob dydd arnyn nhw, ac efallai dyw pobl ddim yn gweld hynny yn y cyd-destun penodol hwn.
English: Okay. Well, the Law Commission published an impact assessment alongside its report, 'Form and Accessibility of the Law Applicable in Wales'. Has this been used to inform costings for this Legislation (Wales) Bill, and, if so, how?
Welsh: Ocê. Nawr, mi gyhoeddodd Comisiwn y Gyfraith asesiad effaith ochr yn ochr â'u hadroddiad nhw, 'Ffurf a Hygyrchedd y Gyfraith sy'n Gymwys yng Nghymru'. A ddefnyddioch chi hwnnw i lywio costau ar gyfer eich Bil deddfwriaeth, ac, os wnaethoch chi, sut?
English: So, you say that the financial factors weren't the main consideration, but what priority was given to costs during the development of the Bill, and how were those costs developed following the consultation? Were there any revisions of that?
Welsh: Ie, felly, rŷch chi'n dweud doedd y ffactorau ariannol ddim yn brif ystyriaeth, wrth gwrs, ond faint o flaenoriaeth oedd y costau yn ystod datblygiad y Bil, a sut gafodd y costau yna eu datblygu wedyn yn dilyn yr ymgynghoriad? Oedd yna ddiwygio a newid?
English: Well, clearly, the costs are important. I would say, in general terms, that if you look at the Government's ambition in ensuring the accessibility of law more generally, you could do that without the Bill on the one level, and perhaps we'll have a discussion on that later on. You could say, 'Well, it's perfectly possible for the Government and the Assembly to prioritise this if they so choose'. So, the question of cost is always important in terms of the resources available for this kind of development. The element of putting the Bill in place specifically doesn't add anything to that conversation, as it were.
Welsh: Wel, mae'r gost, yn amlwg, yn bwysig, a buaswn i'n dweud, yn gyffredinol, os edrychwch chi ar uchelgais y Llywodraeth i sicrhau cyfraith fwy hygyrch yn gyffredinol, gallech chi wneud hynna heb y Bil ar un lefel, ac efallai gawn ni drafodaeth am hynny maes o law. Gallech chi ddweud, 'Wel, mae'n berffaith bosib i'r Llywodraeth a'r Cynulliad flaenoriaethu hyn os ydyn nhw eisiau', ac ati, ac, felly, mae'r cwestiwn o gostau wastod yn bwysig i sicrhau beth yw'r adnoddau sydd ar gael ar gyfer y math yna o beth. Dyw'r elfen o roi'r Bil yn ei le yn benodol, felly, ddim yn ychwanegu at y sgwrs honno, fel petai.
English: Good morning. You talk about delivering something that's more effective. Duplication can be ineffective, and there is an interpretation Act that already exists, namely the UK Interpretation Act 1978. Is there a danger that having two interpretation Acts running alongside each other could create complexity and, therefore, lead to inefficiency?
Welsh: Bore da. Rydych chi'n sôn am ddelifro rhywbeth sydd yn fwy effeithiol. Mae dyblygu'n gallu bod yn aneffeithiol, ac mae yna Ddeddf dehongli arall yn bodoli, sef Deddf Dehongli 1978 y Deyrnas Unedig. Oes yna beryg bod cael dwy Ddeddf yn rhedeg ochr yn ochr â'i gilydd yn creu cymhlethdod, a thrwy gymhlethdod arwain at aneffeithlonrwydd?