techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Yes, you say it prepares them better, but it also hinders them from getting onto the top courses. Now, you wanted - [ Interruption.] You wanted evidence, so listen to some evidence. We know from freedom of information requests that in 2017 Oxford and Cambridge universities made 153 conditional offers to Welsh-domiciled students, none of which included the Welsh bac. Imperial College London said that it is not standard practice to make offers that include the Welsh bac. Indeed, out of 19 Russell Group universities, 14 of them made more conditional offers that did not include the Welsh bac to Welsh-based students than those that did. Therefore, would you agree that, based on the evidence before us, the Welsh bac does nothing to help Welsh students into top universities and everything, in fact, to hinder them? And would you agree with me that your Government should now seriously consider abolishing the Welsh bac altogether?
Welsh: Ie, rydych chi'n dweud ei fod yn eu paratoi'n well, ond mae hefyd yn eu rhwystro rhag cael eu derbyn ar y cyrsiau gorau. Nawr, roeddech chi eisiau - [ Torri ar draws.] Roeddech chi eisiau tystiolaeth, felly gwrandewch ar rywfaint o dystiolaeth. Rydym ni'n gwybod o geisiadau rhyddid gwybodaeth bod prifysgolion Rhydychen a Chaergrawnt wedi gwneud 153 o gynigion amodol i fyfyrwyr o Gymru yn 2017, ac nid oedd yr un ohonyn nhw yn cynnwys bagloriaeth Cymru. Dywedodd Coleg Imperial Llundain nad yw'n arfer safonol gwneud cynigion sy'n cynnwys bagloriaeth Cymru. Yn wir, o 19 o brifysgolion Grŵp Russell, gwnaeth 14 ohonynt fwy o gynigion amodol nad oeddent yn cynnwys bagloriaeth Cymru i fyfyrwyr yng Nghymru na'r rhai a oedd yn ei gynnwys. Felly, a fyddech chi'n cytuno, yn seiliedig ar y dystiolaeth ger ein bron, nad yw bagloriaeth Cymru yn gwneud dim i helpu myfyrwyr Cymru i gael eu derbyn i'r prifysgolion gorau ac yn gwneud popeth, mewn gwirionedd, i'w rhwystro? A ydych chi'n cytuno â mi y dylai eich Llywodraeth ystyried o ddifrif diddymu bagloriaeth Cymru yn gyfan gwbl?
English: No. He doesn't like it because it's Welsh. Let's be honest. He doesn't like anything Welsh, that's the reason why he doesn't like the Welsh bac. Again, he offers no evidence. All he says is that some universities - and Cambridge is supportive of the Welsh bac; we know that, they've said it - are making offers where they rely on traditional A-level grades. They're not saying the Welsh bac is a handicap. And the Welsh bac is not just a qualification in academic terms. It is a qualification that prepares, as I've said, young people for the world of work. Universities are interested in academic grades, employers are interested in academic grades, yes, but also the readiness and preparedness of a young person to enter the world of work. It's something now that of course is being copied in England. I suppose if it's adopted there he'll be all in favour of the Welsh bac at that point, as long as it's called something else, that's not Welsh. No, I think we have done well in preparing our young people for the future. We have grafted the Welsh bac onto the traditional curriculum, and I can say from my own personal experience looking at it with my son, it does an immense amount of good in broadening the horizons of so many youngsters, which they need in order to make themselves even more employable in the future.
Welsh: Nac ydw. Nid yw'n ei hoffi gan ei fod yn gysylltiedig â Chymru. Gadewch i ni fod yn onest. Nid yw'n hoffi dim sy'n gysylltiedig â Chymru, dyna pam nad yw'n hoffi bagloriaeth Cymru. Unwaith eto, nid yw'n cynnig unrhyw dystiolaeth. Y cwbl y mae'n ei ddweud yw bod rhai prifysgolion - ac mae Caergrawnt yn cefnogi bagloriaeth Cymru; rydym ni'n gwybod hynny, maen nhw wedi ei ddweud - yn gwneud cynigion lle maen nhw'n dibynnu ar raddau Safon Uwch traddodiadol. Nid ydyn nhw'n dweud bod bagloriaeth Cymru yn anfantais. Ac nid yw bagloriaeth Cymru yn gymhwyster o safbwynt academaidd yn unig. Mae'n gymhwyster sy'n paratoi pobl ifanc, fel y dywedais, ar gyfer y byd gwaith. Mae gan brifysgolion ddiddordeb mewn graddau academaidd, mae gan gyflogwyr ddiddordeb mewn graddau academaidd, oes, ond hefyd parodrwydd a pharatoad person ifanc i ymuno â'r byd gwaith. Mae'n rhywbeth nawr sy'n cael ei ailadrodd yn Lloegr, wrth gwrs. Mae'n debyg os caiff ei fabwysiadu yno y bydd o blaid bagloriaeth Cymru bryd hynny, cyn belled ag y bo ganddo wahanol enw, nad yw'n gysylltiedig â Chymru. Na, rwy'n credu ein bod ni wedi gwneud yn dda i baratoi ein pobl ifanc ar gyfer y dyfodol. Rydym ni wedi asio bagloriaeth Cymru i'r cwricwlwm traddodiadol, a gallaf ddweud o'm profiad personol fy hun o edrych arno gyda fy mab, ei fod yn gwneud llawer iawn o ddaioni o ran ehangu gorwelion cynifer o bobl ifanc, sydd ei angen arnynt er mwyn gwneud eu hunain hyd yn oed yn fwy cyflogadwy yn y dyfodol.
English: It is a central ambition of the Government that everyone in Wales has a fair opportunity to live a healthy life, irrespective of their background or where they live. We continue to tackle the root causes of health inequalities through national and local action, and across Government.
Welsh: Mae'n un o uchelgeisiau canolog y Llywodraeth fod pawb yng Nghymru yn cael cyfle teg i fyw bywyd iach, ni waeth beth yw eu cefndir neu ym mha le maen nhw'n byw. Rydym ni'n parhau i fynd i'r afael ag achosion sylfaenol anghydraddoldebau iechyd trwy gymryd camau cenedlaethol a lleol, ac ar draws y Llywodraeth.
English: Thank you for that answer, First Minister. In spite of the significant investment in health services in my constituency, we can see that there still remains an alarming health trend amongst the local population. You'll be aware that in 2016 the annual report of the Chief Medical Officer for Wales highlighted the social inequities that affect areas like Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney. Now, clearly adequate funding of local health and care services in order to overcome these inequalities must remain as the core of the Welsh Government's work in the years ahead, but given that these inequalities stubbornly persist, what more can the Welsh Government do to ensure that income and social class do not continue to be barriers to good health?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb yna, Prif Weinidog. Er gwaethaf y buddsoddiad sylweddol mewn gwasanaethau iechyd yn fy etholaeth i, gallwn weld bod tueddiad iechyd sy'n peri pryder yn parhau o hyd ymhlith y boblogaeth leol. Byddwch yn ymwybodol bod adroddiad blynyddol Prif Swyddog Meddygol Cymru yn 2016 wedi tynnu sylw at yr annhegwch cymdeithasol sy'n effeithio ar ardaloedd fel Merthyr Tudful a Rhymni. Nawr, mae'n rhaid i gyllid digonol i wasanaethau iechyd a gofal lleol i oresgyn yr anghydraddoldebau hyn barhau i fod yn ganolog i waith Llywodraeth Cymru yn y blynyddoedd i ddod, ond o gofio bod yr anghydraddoldebau hyn yn parhau'n ystyfnig, beth arall all Llywodraeth Cymru ei wneud i sicrhau nad yw incwm a dosbarth cymdeithasol yn parhau i fod yn rhwystrau i iechyd da?
English: Tackling social inequality is a cross-Government priority, as demonstrated by the fact it's a central ambition of 'Prosperity for All'. To give examples of Government programmes that are tackling the root cause of health inequalities, they include employment programmes, quality housing and access to childcare. They're combined with programmes to address healthy behaviour and improved access to healthcare, because we know that will reduce barriers to good health as well. And, of course, the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 provides new impetus in tackling the persistent underlying causes of health inequalities through working differently with partners, intervening earlier and promoting better integration between services.
Welsh: Mae mynd i'r afael ag anghydraddoldeb cymdeithasol yn flaenoriaeth traws-Lywodraeth, fel y dangosir gan y ffaith ei fod yn un o uchelgeisiau canolog 'Ffyniant i Bawb'. I roi enghreifftiau o raglenni'r Llywodraeth sy'n mynd i'r afael ag achosion sydd wrth wraidd anghydraddoldebau iechyd, maen nhw'n cynnwys rhaglenni cyflogaeth, tai o ansawdd a mynediad at ofal plant. Maen nhw'n cael eu cyfuno â rhaglenni i fynd i'r afael ag ymddygiad iachus a gwell mynediad at ofal iechyd, gan ein bod ni'n gwybod y bydd hynny'n lleihau rhwystrau i iechyd da hefyd. Ac, wrth gwrs, mae Deddf Llesiant Cenedlaethau'r Dyfodol (Cymru) 2015 yn darparu ysgogiad newydd i fynd i'r afael ag achosion sylfaenol parhaus anghydraddoldebau iechyd trwy weithio'n wahanol gyda phartneriaid, ymyrryd yn gynharach a hyrwyddo gwell integreiddio rhwng gwasanaethau.
English: First Minister, Merthyr Tydfil has the highest level of childhood obesity in Wales. Seventeen and a half per cent of children in Merthyr Tydfil are obese, more than double the figure of the Vale of Glamorgan. In the view of the fact that diabetes is the fastest growing health crisis in Wales, what action is the Welsh Government taking to target areas of high childhood obesity, such as Merthyr Tydfil, to reduce future pressures on the NHS in Wales, please?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, mae gan Ferthyr Tudful y lefel uchaf o ordewdra ymhlith plant yng Nghymru. Mae un deg saith y cant o blant ym Merthyr Tudful yn ordew, sy'n fwy na dwywaith ffigur Bro Morgannwg. Yng ngoleuni'r ffaith mai diabetes yw'r argyfwng iechyd sy'n tyfu gyflymaf yng Nghymru, pa gamau mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn eu cymryd i dargedu ardaloedd o ordewdra uchel ymhlith plant, fel Merthyr Tudful, i leihau'r pwysau ar y GIG yng Nghymru yn y dyfodol, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: Well, there's consistent evidence to suggest that an investment in the early years significantly improves health, social and economic outcomes. So, our Healthy Child Wales programme has been developed with a standard universal NHS offer for all families with children aged nought to seven. That offers a consistent range of preventative and early intervention measures and, importantly, guidance to support parenting and healthy lifestyle choices. It also identifies families in need of additional support. So, that's one example, that programme, of what we are doing in order to ensure that the issue of obesity is tackled early on in a child's life, before difficult habits start to form.
Welsh: Wel, ceir tystiolaeth gyson i awgrymu bod buddsoddiad yn y blynyddoedd cynnar yn gwella canlyniadau iechyd, cymdeithasol ac economaidd yn sylweddol. Felly, datblygwyd ein rhaglen Plant Iach Cymru gyda chynnig GIG cyffredinol safonol i bob teulu sydd â phlant rhwng dim a saith oed. Mae hynny'n cynnig amrywiaeth gyson o fesurau ataliol ac ymyrraeth gynnar ac, yn bwysig, canllawiau i gynorthwyo rhianta a dewisiadau ffordd iach o fyw. Mae hefyd yn nodi teuluoedd sydd angen cymorth ychwanegol. Felly, dyna un enghraifft, y rhaglen honno, o'r hyn yr ydym ni'n ei wneud i sicrhau bod y mater o ordewdra yn cael sylw yn gynnar ym mywyd plentyn, cyn i arferion anodd ddechrau ffurfio.
English: Lifting the housing revenue account borrowing cap is significant. It's welcome in Wales. It's a u-turn, but, nevertheless, we do welcome what has been done. It will help local authorities to deliver on their council house building strategies. And we're working closely with those authorities to fully understand the benefits.
Welsh: Mae codi'r cap benthyg ar y cyfrif refeniw tai yn arwyddocaol. Mae i'w groesawu yng Nghymru. Mae'n dro pedol, ond, serch hynny, rydym ni'n croesawu'r hyn a wnaed. Bydd yn helpu awdurdodau lleol i gyflawni eu strategaethau adeiladu tai cyngor. Ac rydym ni'n gweithio'n agos gyda'r awdurdodau hynny i ddeall y manteision yn llawn.
English: I also welcome the fact that this cap has been lifted. It will also allow local authorities to work effectively with other organisations, especially housing associations. I note the interesting partnership model that exists in Warrington council, where they have increased the total loans to housing associations by hundreds of millions of pounds. That sort of imagination we could see in Wales, with potential for local authorities to commission housing association development teams or to partner on modern methods of construction to achieve the scale that we need in this regard. And, as you, I think, also referred to, the 20,000 home target that we have in this Assembly term for social homes is another key area. But we need to go way beyond and ensure the new borrowing powers are used very, very effectively.
Welsh: Rwyf innau hefyd yn croesawu'r ffaith bod y cap hwn wedi ei godi. Bydd hefyd yn galluogi awdurdodau lleol i weithio'n effeithiol gyda sefydliadau eraill, yn enwedig cymdeithasau tai. Nodaf y model partneriaeth diddorol sy'n bodoli yng nghyngor Warrington, lle maen nhw wedi rhoi cannoedd o filiynau o bunnoedd yn fwy i gyfanswm y benthyciadau i gymdeithasau tai. Gallem weld y math hwnnw o ddychymyg yng Nghymru, gyda'r potensial i awdurdodau lleol gomisiynu timau datblygu cymdeithasau tai neu i ffurfio partneriaethau ar ddulliau adeiladu modern i gyflawni'r raddfa sydd ei hangen arnom yn hyn o beth. Ac, fel y gwnaethoch chi, rwy'n meddwl, gyfeirio ato hefyd, mae'r targed o 20,000 o gartrefi sydd gennym ni yn y tymor Cynulliad hwn ar gyfer cartrefi cymdeithasol yn faes allweddol arall. Ond mae angen i ni fynd ymhell y tu hwnt a sicrhau bod y pwerau benthyg newydd yn cael eu defnyddio yn hynod, hynod effeithiol.
English: Yes, that's true. One thing I can say is that the Minister has commissioned an independent review of the affordable housing supply. That's looking at a range of policies and processes to ensure we maximise the number of homes we get from our considerable investment. And, of course, the lifting of the borrowing cap will form part of the panel's consideration, and we expect recommendations from that panel in April of next year.
Welsh: Ydy, mae hynny'n wir. Un peth y gallaf ei ddweud yw bod y Gweinidog wedi comisiynu adolygiad annibynnol o'r cyflenwad tai fforddiadwy. Mae hwnnw'n ystyried amrywiaeth o bolisïau a phrosesau i sicrhau ein bod ni'n sicrhau'r nifer fwyaf bosibl o gartrefi yr ydym ni'n eu cael o'n buddsoddiad sylweddol. Ac, wrth gwrs, bydd codi'r cap benthyg yn rhan o ystyriaeth y panel, ac rydym ni'n disgwyl argymhellion gan y panel hwnnw ym mis Ebrill y flwyddyn nesaf.
English: I think it's fair to say that it's fairly vague at the moment, and fairly incoherent in terms of how it might operate or how much money might be available. I raised it, certainly, last week with David Lidington. It's not clear how it would work, how much money would be available and, of course, how it would work in terms of meshing with the devolved settlement. We simply have to wait and see.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu ei bod hi'n deg i ddweud ei bod hi'n eithaf amwys ar hyn o bryd, ac yn eithaf aneglur o ran sut y gallai weithredu neu faint o arian a allai fod ar gael. Fe'i codais, yn sicr, yr wythnos diwethaf gyda David Lidington. Nid yw'n eglur sut y byddai'n gweithio, faint o arian fyddai ar gael nac, wrth gwrs, sut y byddai'n gweithio o ran asio â'r setliad datganoli. Yn syml, mae'n rhaid i ni aros i weld.
English: I thank the First Minister for that response, and I'm aware that there have been pre-consultation meetings taking place in Wales, and the most recent one, I think, was last Friday, with representatives of the third sector. So, I don't know if the First Minister has got any feedback from those meetings, but doesn't he agree that it is absolutely crucial that the future of regional policy lies in the hands of the Welsh Government, and that the focus should be on tackling inequality as a means of improving prosperity and productivity?
Welsh: Diolchaf i'r Prif Weinidog am yr ymateb yna, ac rwy'n ymwybodol bod cyfarfodydd cyn-ymgynghori wedi eu cynnal yng Nghymru, ac roedd y diweddaraf, rwy'n credu, ddydd Gwener diwethaf, gyda chynrychiolwyr y trydydd sector. Felly, nid wyf i'n gwybod a yw'r Prif Weinidog wedi cael unrhyw adborth o'r cyfarfodydd hynny, ond onid yw'n cytuno ei bod hi'n gwbl hanfodol mai Llywodraeth Cymru sy'n gyfrifol am ddyfodol polisi rhanbarthol, ac y dylai'r pwyslais fod ar fynd i'r afael ag anghydraddoldeb fel ffordd o wella ffyniant a chynhyrchiant?
English: Absolutely, because that is a devolved responsibility. It would be wholly inappropriate for a shared prosperity fund to be administered entirely from Whitehall, bypassing the Government and the Assembly completely. That would cut across what the UK Government has said about devolved responsibilities in a very serious way. There was indeed a stakeholder event in Cardiff that took place on Thursday and Friday last week regarding the shared prosperity fund. In fairness, our officials were invited the day before. So, we didn't get much notice of that event taking place, but it does give you an example of the incoherent approach that's being taken where the Wales Office arranges something, doesn't tell anybody, appears to cut across devolved responsibility even though it has no powers of its own, and then all that does is confuse businesses. Well, I think it would be far better if the UK Government were clearer and followed the approach that we've suggested, where in effect you have a fund that closely mirrors the operation of the current European funds, and, of course, with maximum - a common set of rules, of course, but maximum flexibility for the devolved Governments.
Welsh: Yn sicr, oherwydd mae hwnnw'n gyfrifoldeb datganoledig. Byddai'n gwbl amhriodol i gronfa ffyniant gyffredin gael ei gweinyddu'n llwyr o Whitehall, gan osgoi'r Llywodraeth a'r Cynulliad yn gyfan gwbl. Byddai hynny'n mynd yn groes i'r hyn y mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi ei ddweud am gyfrifoldebau datganoledig mewn ffordd ddifrifol iawn. Yn wir, roedd digwyddiad i randdeiliaid yng Nghaerdydd a gynhaliwyd ddydd Iau a dydd Gwener yr wythnos diwethaf ynghylch y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin. Er tegwch, gwahoddwyd ein swyddogion y diwrnod cynt. Felly, ni chawsom lawer o rybudd bod y digwyddiad hwnnw'n cael ei gynnal, ond mae'n rhoi enghraifft i chi o'r dull anghydlynol sy'n cael ei fabwysiadu pan fydd Swyddfa Cymru yn trefnu rhywbeth, ddim yn dweud wrth neb, yn ymddangos i dorri ar draws cyfrifoldeb datganoledig er nad oes ganddi unrhyw bwerau ei hun, ac yna'r cwbl y mae hynny'n ei wneud yw drysu busnesau. Wel, rwy'n credu y byddai'n llawer gwell pe byddai Llywodraeth y DU yn fwy eglur ac yn dilyn y dull yr ydym ni wedi ei awgrymu, lle mae gennych chi gronfa sy'n adlewyrchu'n agos, i bob pwrpas, gweithrediad y cronfeydd Ewropeaidd presennol, ac, wrth gwrs, gyda'r hyblygrwydd mwyaf posibl - cyfres gyffredin o reolau, wrth gwrs, ond yr hyblygrwydd mwyaf posibl i'r Llywodraethau datganoledig.
English: First Minister, the Member for Cardiff North makes a very good point when she says that future regional policy should be controlled by the Welsh Government, by this Assembly - a point that you've echoed yourself. Whilst I appreciate that there are still details, a large number of details, about the shared prosperity fund to be effectively ironed out, it's important that when the current European funding ends and the shared prosperity fund, whatever final form that takes, kicks in - it's important at that point that the Welsh Government is best placed to access that funding. What are you doing to make sure that Welsh Government departments across portfolios are fit for purpose and are ready to be at the front of the queue to access that shared prosperity funding as soon as we do leave the EU? Because it's important that there isn't a gap in funding.
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, mae'r Aelod dros Ogledd Caerdydd yn gwneud pwynt da iawn pan ddywed y dylai polisi rhanbarthol yn y dyfodol gael ei reoli gan Lywodraeth Cymru, gan y Cynulliad hwn - pwynt yr ydych chi wedi ei ategu eich hun. Er fy mod i'n sylweddoli bod manylion, nifer fawr o fanylion, am y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin i'w cytuno'n effeithiol o hyd, mae'n bwysig pan fydd y cyllid Ewropeaidd presennol yn dod i ben ac y bydd y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin, pa bynnag ffurf derfynol y bydd honno'n ei chymryd, yn dechrau - mae'n bwysig ar yr adeg honno bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn y sefyllfa orau i gael mynediad at y cyllid hwnnw. Beth ydych chi'n ei wneud i sicrhau bod adrannau Llywodraeth Cymru ar draws portffolios yn addas i'w diben ac yn barod i fod ar flaen y ciw i gael mynediad at y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin honno cyn gynted ag y byddwn yn gadael yr UE? Oherwydd mae'n bwysig nad oes bwlch yn y cyllid.
English: Well, the structure is there, of course. We've had years of dealing with European funds. The Wales European Funding Office and other departments are well used to dealing with this kind of funding structure. The shared prosperity fund is not of itself a bad idea. It's how much money will be available and how it is administered that we are troubled by. It's hugely important, as the Member himself, in fairness, has said, that this in effect replaces European funds in terms of the actual quantum available but that the responsibilities and rights of this Chamber and the Government are protected as the shared prosperity fund is developed. We'd prefer to be part of that conversation to make sure that the fund operates not just as far as Wales is concerned but works properly across the whole of the UK.
Welsh: Wel, mae'r strwythur yno, wrth gwrs. Rydym ni wedi cael blynyddoedd o ymdrin â chyllid Ewropeaidd. Mae Swyddfa Cyllid Ewropeaidd Cymru ac adrannau eraill wedi hen arfer ymdrin â'r math hwn o strwythur ariannu. Nid yw'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin yn syniad gwael ynddo'i hun. Faint o arian fydd ar gael a sut y caiff ei weinyddu sy'n peri pryder i ni. Mae'n aruthrol o bwysig, fel y mae'r Aelod ei hun, a bod yn deg, wedi dweud, bod hyn i bob pwrpas yn disodli'r cronfeydd Ewropeaidd o ran y swm gwirioneddol sydd ar gael ond bod cyfrifoldebau a hawliau'r Siambr hon a'r Llywodraeth yn cael eu hamddiffyn wrth i'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin gael ei datblygu. Byddai'n well gennym fod yn rhan o'r sgwrs honno i wneud yn siŵr bod y gronfa yn gweithredu nid yn unig cyn belled ag mae Cymru yn y cwestiwn ond yn gweithio'n iawn ar draws y DU gyfan.
English: Of course, we still have questions about the existing arrangements before moving to the so-called shared prosperity fund. The First Minister will be aware of the audit office report on the impact of a 'no deal' separation on structural and regional funding as they stand. At the time of the report's publication in August, it noted that WEFO had exceeded its spending targets in three out of four of its operational programmes and underspent in one, which was west Wales and the Valleys. In the first instance, is the First Minister able to reassure us that overspends will be covered by the UK Government in the event of a 'no deal' separation, and can he update the Assembly further on whether all spending targets in all operational programmes are now being met or exceeded?
Welsh: Wrth gwrs, mae gennym ni gwestiynau o hyd ynghylch y trefniadau presennol cyn symud ymlaen i'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin, fel y'i gelwir. Bydd y Prif Weinidog yn ymwybodol o adroddiad y swyddfa archwilio ar effaith gwahaniad 'dim cytundeb' ar gyllid strwythurol a rhanbarthol fel y maen nhw ar hyn o bryd. Ar adeg cyhoeddi'r adroddiad ym mis Awst, nododd bod WEFO wedi mynd y tu hwnt i'w thargedau gwario yn nhri o'i phedair rhaglen weithredol ac wedi tanwario mewn un, sef gorllewin Cymru a'r Cymoedd. Yn y lle cyntaf, a all y Prif Weinidog roi sicrwydd i ni y bydd achosion o orwario yn cael eu talu gan Lywodraeth y DU os bydd gwahaniad 'dim cytundeb', ac a all ef ddiweddaru'r Cynulliad ymhellach ar ba un a yw'r holl dargedau gwario ym mhob rhaglen weithredol yn cael eu bodloni nawr neu a oes mwy na hynny'n cael ei wario?