techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Okay. Just from me, I'm given to understand that there are still problems in terms of how prominent you are on the EPG, and that there are problems in terms of smart tvs. Clearly, we've provided evidence on this, but what is your updated view on this?
Welsh: Ocê. Jyst gen i, rwyf ar ddeall bod yna broblemau o hyd ynglŷn â pha mor flaengar ydych chi ar yr EPG, a bod problemau o ran teledau smart, ac yn y blaen. Yn amlwg, rydym ni wedi rhoi tystiolaeth ger bron ar hwn. Beth yw eich barn ddiweddaraf chi ar hwn?
English: In terms of the review, I think that's where we were slightly disappointed, perhaps, that there weren't stronger words on the importance of prominence in those terms. And since the publication of the review, of course, Tony Hall and Alex Mahon of Channel 4 have come out very strongly in terms of the importance of prominence on new technology for public broadcasters in general. And of course, if this is true for the BBC and Channel 4, then it is so much more relevant in terms of a minority language channel such as S4C. Now, there are technical difficulties, I'm sure, but it's difficult to believe that it isn't possible within such a large unit as the UK to have rules for prominence on new platforms that seek to to safeguard the kind of benefits that public broadcasters have had on the old platforms. I do think that the fact that we have been on that number 4 button on analogue first of all, and then on digital, and now on Sky too, has been hugely important, and remains hugely important in the fact that many people still watch television by going through the EPG just to see what's on. Being there on that front page is very important indeed. So, any situation where that would change entirely, where you would have to scroll through a whole host of different apps or channels for your Welsh language material, just makes it more difficult for Welsh speakers to access Welsh language output.
Welsh: Rwy'n meddwl mai hynny, o ran yr adolygiad, efallai oedd yr un lle roeddem yn teimlo ychydig yn siomedig bod yna ddim geiriau cryfach ynglŷn â phwysigrwydd amlygrwydd. Ac ers i'r adolygiad ddod allan, wrth gwrs, mae Tony Hall ac Alex Mahon yn Channel 4 wedi dod allan yn gryf o ran pwysigrwydd amlygrwydd ar dechnoleg newydd ar gyfer darlledwyr cyhoeddus yn gyffredinol. Ac wrth gwrs, os ydy hyn yn wir ar gyfer y BBC a Channel 4, gymaint fwy gwir ydy o o ran sianel iaith leiafrifol fel S4C. Nawr, mae yna anawsterau technegol yn siŵr o fod, ond mae'n anodd credu nad ydy hi'n bosibl, o fewn uned mor sylweddol â'r Deyrnas Unedig, i gael rheolau ar gyfer amlygrwydd ar lwyfannau newydd sydd yn ceisio gwarchod y math o fanteision mae darlledwyr cyhoeddus wedi eu cael ar yr hen blatfformau. Rwy'n meddwl bod y ffaith ein bod ni wedi bod ar fotwm rhif 4 ar deledu analog i ddechrau, wedyn ar deledu digidol ac nawr ar Sky hefyd, wedi bod yn ofnadwy o bwysig, ac yn dal i fod yn bwysig yn y ffaith bod yna lawer o bobl yn dal i wylio teledu drwy fynd at yr EPG jest i weld beth sydd ymlaen. Ac mae cael bod yn fanna ar y dudalen flaen yn bwysig. Felly, mae unrhyw sefyllfa lle mae hynny yn newid yn llwyr, lle mae'n rhaid i chi fynd i chwilio drwy ddryswig o apps, neu beth bynnag, am eich deunydd Cymraeg jest yn ei gwneud hi'n fwy anodd i bobl sy'n siarad Cymraeg ffeindio deunydd Cymraeg.
English: What's the solution to this? There are a number of different companies bringing these different systems forward for various televisions. Are you going to be able to deliver that? Because what works on a Samsung tv is different to what would work on a Sony tv.
Welsh: Ond beth yw'r ateb i hynny? Mae yna lot o gwmnïau gwahanol sydd yn creu systemau gwahanol ar gyfer teledau gwahanol. A ydych chi'n mynd i allu gwneud hynny? Achos mae beth sy'n gweithio ar deledu Samsung yn wahanol i beth sydd ar deledu Sony.
English: You're quite right; that's the problem. But unless we, and unless you, make this case, then nobody's going to listen. I think it's a case that has to be made, and that there should be a combination of technical innovation as well as political will, and regulatory will, which could help to make the Welsh language more prominent in the future than it's at risk of being as things currently stand.
Welsh: Rydych chi'n hollol iawn; dyna ydy'r broblem. Ond rwy'n meddwl os na wnawn ni, ac os na wnewch chi, yr achos yma, wel, fydd neb yn poeni. Rwy'n meddwl ei fod o'n achos sy'n rhaid ei wneud, a bod yna gyfuniad o bosib yn fanna o ddawn dechnegol plus ewyllys wleidyddol ac ewyllys reoleiddio a all helpu i wneud y Gymraeg yn fwy amlwg yn y dyfodol na mae yna berygl iddi fod efo pethau fel maen nhw.
English: I don't know why I'm speaking English. I get a lot of people communicating with me about that. What are you doing in terms of timescales, to implement that in our real lives?
Welsh: Nid ydw i ddim yn gwybod pam rwy'n siarad Saesneg. Rwy'n cael lot o bobl yn cyfathrebu â fi ynglŷn â hynny. Beth ydych chi'n ei wneud o ran amserlenni hynny, i weithredu yn ein bywydau go iawn?
English: There are two steps. The first is to create the language database. I know that there are various organisations that have already been working on that. We believe that will take at least 12 months. The next step: once we have that digital package, then we need to sell that to the people who create the software and provide the infrastructure for these systems. I think it will be two or three years, to be realistic. Unless a lot of funding is provided for this, that's what's possible. But we're working very closely with the Government on that.
Welsh: Mae yna ddau gam. Y cam cyntaf yw creu bas data o'r iaith. Rwy'n credu bod yna wahanol gyrff wedi bod yn gweithio ar hynny barod. Rydym ni'n meddwl bod hynny'n mynd i gymryd o leiaf blwyddyn. Y cam nesaf: unwaith mae gennym ni'r pecyn iaith yna, yn ddigidol, wedyn mae'r gwaith o werthu hwnnw i'r bobl sy'n creu'r meddalwedd sydd yn rhedeg yr isadeiledd i'r systemau yma. Rwy'n credu y bydd yn ddwy flynedd i dair blynedd, i fod yn realistig. Os nad oes talp o arian yn dod at y peth, dyna beth sy'n bosib. Ond rydym ni'n gweithio'n glòs iawn efo'r Llywodraeth ar hynny ar y funud.
English: What about the Commission? Because they're developing their own work on this as well - the Assembly Commission.
Welsh: Beth am y Comisiwn? Achos maen nhw'n datblygu gwaith eu hunain ar hyn hefyd - Comisiwn y Cynulliad.
English: We've met with them too.
Welsh: Rydym ni wedi cwrdd â nhw hefyd.
English: You have.
Welsh: Rydych chi wedi.
English: Yes, because they are very prominent in this area, to be fair to them. When I met the Government, I also met the Commission.
Welsh: Do, achos maen nhw'n flaenllaw iawn yn y maes yma, i fod yn deg iddyn nhw. Pan gwrddais i â'r Llywodraeth, fe wnes i gwrdd â'r Comisiwn ar yr un pryd.
English: Okay, if we could have more of an update on that, when you can, that would be great.
Welsh: Ocê, wel, os cawn ni fwy o ddiweddariad ar hynny, pan ydych chi'n gallu, byddai hynny'n grêt.
English: A great deal of energy is being invested in it, which is good to see.
Welsh: Mae lot o egni'n mynd mewn i'r peth, sy'n wych i weld.
English: I'm very pleased to hear that, because I was going to ask the same question, because we have questions with Adam Price this afternoon about the official languages scheme. There is a question for him as well, then. I just wanted to speak quickly about the licence fee. Do you have any concerns about obtaining all the money from one source?
Welsh: Rwy'n falch iawn o glywed hynny, achos roeddwn i'n mynd i ofyn yr un cwestiwn, achos mae gyda ni gwestiynau gyda Adam Price y prynhawn yma ynglŷn â'r cynllun ieithoedd swyddogol. Mae cwestiwn iddo ef hefyd, felly. Rwyf jest eisiau siarad yn glou am y ffi trwydded. A oes gyda chi unrhyw bryderon ynglŷn â chael yr arian cyfan o'r un ffynhonnell?
English: We believe, because - . Two things specifically. In the statement made by the Government on this, there is a commitment to guarantee the independence of S4C that is very strong and very clear, and we think that's important. It is a signifier of the Government's intent. Also, over the past few months, at the end of last year, we signed a new partnership agreement with the BBC centrally that defines our relationship with the BBC on a financial, technical and a creative level. That too makes it entirely clear that it's a partnership between two independent bodies, and that's what we have here. The final thing is that the responsibility for securing sufficient funding doesn't shift from the Secretary of State in DCMS. That individual - whoever he or she may be - will be responsible for deciding, at the end of the day, whether the funding provided for S4C is sufficient to carry out its work. That clearly means that the question of funding S4C ultimately from the licence fee becomes part of that broader discussion on the level of the licence fee. So, I do think that we can be confident that the independence of S4C isn't threatened by this shift from the financial situation as it was to the funding coming directly from the licence fee.
Welsh: Rydym ni'n meddwl, oherwydd - . Dau beth yn benodol. Yn y datganiad sydd gan y Llywodraeth ynglŷn â hyn, mae'r ymrwymiad i warantu annibyniaeth S4C yn glir iawn ac yn gryf, ac rydym ni'n meddwl bod hynny'n bwysig. Mae'n arwydd o beth yw'r bwriad. Rydym ni hefyd, yn ystod y misoedd diwethaf, diwedd y llynedd, wedi arwyddo cytundeb partneriaeth newydd gyda'r BBC yn ganolog sydd yn diffinio beth yw'n perthynas ni gyda'r BBC ar lefel ariannol, dechnegol a chreadigol. Mae hwnnw hefyd yn ei gwneud hi'n hollol glir mai partneriaeth rhwng dau gorff annibynnol yw hwn. Y peth olaf yw - nid yw'r cyfrifoldeb am sicrhau arian digonol yn symud oddi wrth ysgwyddau'r Ysgrifennydd Gwladol yn DCMS. Y person yna - pwy bynnag, fo neu hi - fydd yn gyfrifol am ddyfarnu, ar ddiwedd y dydd, a ydy'r arian sydd yn dod i S4C yn ddigonol i wneud y gwaith. Mae hynny, yn amlwg wedyn, yn golygu bod cwestiwn ariannu S4C yn y pen draw o'r drwydded deledu yn mynd yn rhan o'r drafodaeth ehangach ynglŷn â lefel y drwydded deledu. Felly, rydw i'n meddwl y gallwn ni fod yn hyderus nid yw annibyniaeth S4C yn cael ei fygwth gan y symud ariannol yma i'r cyllid ddod yn gyfan gwbl o'r drwydded deledu.
English: I'm pleased to hear that you're seeing that clearly, because the BBC now has to understand that the right to the money that comes through the licence fee - that all of it isn't just for them, that there is more than one body that has a right to ask for some of that. You've also said that you would like to see more plurality of funding of S4C. In saying that, are you saying that you are looking at how to increase the commercial offer? Somebody else is going to ask questions about that, but do you see that as a threat perhaps to how the Government decides what will be sufficient in the future? What I'm trying to say is: are we talking about the funding coming through commercial sources as additional to what comes through the licence fee?
Welsh: Rwy'n falch o glywed eich bod chi'n gweld hynny yn glir, achos wrth gwrs mae'n rhaid i'r BBC nawr ddeall bod yr hawl i'r arian sy'n dod drwy'r ffi trwydded - nid yw'r cyfan iddyn nhw; mae mwy nag un corff sydd â'r hawl i ofyn am ychydig o hynny. Rydych chi wedi dweud hefyd yr hoffech chi weld fwy o luosogrwydd gydag ariannu S4C. A ydych chi'n meddwl, gan ddweud hynny, eich bod chi'n edrych ar sut i dyfu y cynnig masnachol? Mae rhywun arall yn mynd i ofyn cwestiynau ynglŷn â hynny, ond a ydych chi'n gweld hynny fel bygythiad efallai i sut mae'r Llywodraeth yn penderfynu beth fydd yn ddigonol yn y dyfodol? Beth rwy'n trio dweud yw: a ydym ni'n sôn bod yr arian sy'n dod drwy'r ffrwd fasnachol yn mynd i fod yn ychwanegol i'r arian sy'n dod drwy'r drwydded?
English: Well, that's what I would argue - yes, that's what it should be, because in the commercial world there are no certainties. We have the right to innovate commercially, not a guarantee of success. We have to be realistic about that. We also need to be realistic about the directions that we could take and what the scope is to make significant additional profits. Specifically, one would think that the obvious place we could go is to sell programmes abroad. But the rights don't sit with S4C; they sit with the producers. S4C and the producers are already very proactive in the work of gathering funds from joint productions to make those programmes in the first place. There is around £20 million of co-production funding that has come in to make programming that has appeared on S4C over the past five or six years, which is a significant sum of money. A significant chunk of that is distribution money that the distributors have invested. Of course, they are then exploiting the sales outwith the UK. So, we need to be realistic about this, but I also think we need to welcome the fact that there is an incentive to do this, because the organisation, the producers, the distributors, need to be entrepreneurial and take advantage of the new opportunities that exist.
Welsh: Wel, wrth gwrs, dyna fyddwn i'n dadlau - yn sicr dyna y dylai fod, oherwydd yn y byd masnachol nid oes dim byd yn sicr. Hawl i fentro yn fasnachol rydym ni'n cael, dim gwarant o lwyddiant. Mae angen bod yn realistig ynglŷn â hynny. Hefyd mae angen bod yn realistig rydw i'n meddwl ynglŷn â'r cyfeiriadau y gallwn ni fynd iddyn nhw a beth felly yw'r sgôp i wneud arian sylweddol ychwanegol. Yn benodol, byddai rhywun yn meddwl mai'r lle amlwg i ni fynd yw i werthu rhaglenni dramor. Y ffaith yw, nid yw hawliau rhaglenni yn eistedd gyda S4C; mae'n nhw'n eistedd gyda'r cynhyrchwyr. Mae S4C a'r cynhyrchwyr eisoes yn proactive iawn yn y gwaith o gasglu arian cydgynhyrchu i wneud y rhaglenni yn y lle cyntaf. Mae tua £20 miliwn o arian cydgynhyrchu o wahanol fathau wedi dod i fewn i wneud rhaglenni sydd wedi ymddangos ar S4C yn ystod y pum neu chwe mlynedd ddiwethaf, sy'n swm sylweddol. Mae talp sylweddol o hwnnw yn arian dosbarthu y mae dosbarthwyr wedi rhoi mewn i'r peth. Wedyn nhw, wrth gwrs, sydd yn ecsbloetio y gwerthiant y tu allan i Brydain. Felly, mae eisiau bod yn realistig ynglŷn â hyn, ond hefyd, rydw i'n meddwl, mae eisiau croesawu'r ffaith fod yna gymhelliad i wneud hyn, achos mae angen i'r corff, mae angen i'r cynhyrchwyr, mae angen i'r dosbarthwyr, fod yn fentrus a manteisio ar y cyfleoedd newydd sydd yn bodoli.
English: But the important thing, and what I'm trying to get at, is that what's important here is that, when the law's talking about sufficient money, it's talking about core funding - that's how it's described.
Welsh: Ond y peth pwysig, beth rydw i'n trio cyrraedd, yw: beth sy'n bwysig yma, pan fo'r gyfraith yn sôn am arian digonol, mae'n sôn am core funding - mae'n cael ei ddisgrifio fel yna.
English: Yes, definitely.
Welsh: Yn bendant. Yn bendant.
English: Just one further question from me: before the review, you said that there was a need to safeguard the plurality of funding, but what I'm hearing today is that you're quite content that it is coming through one stream, which is the licence fee. Is that a change of opinion?
Welsh: Jest un cwestiwn gennyf: cyn yr adolygiad, roeddech chi wedi dweud bod angen diogelu lluosogrwydd y cyllid, ond, o beth rydw i'n clywed heddiw, rydych chi'n weddol hapus ei fod e'n dod trwy un ffrwd, sef y drwydded. A ydy hynny yn newid barn, neu ydy hynny - ?
English: It wouldn't be our choice to change the current regime, but we are looking at this objectively, and we believe that we can make it work without it undermining the independence of S4C.
Welsh: Rydw i'n meddwl - nid ein dewis ni fyddai newid y drefn bresennol, ond rydym ni yn edrych ar hwn yn wrthrychol ac yn meddwl y gallwn ni wneud i hyn weithio hebddo fo danseilio annibyniaeth S4C.
English: What was your main opposition to seeing this happen? Because what we've heard is that it takes the politics out of it if it goes through the licence fee, perhaps, but I'm not sure whether I agree with that. What is your main argument about perhaps it's not as ideal as that?
Welsh: Pam na fyddech chi - beth oedd eich prif wrthwynebiad i weld hwn yn digwydd? Achos beth rŷm ni wedi clywed yw ei fod e'n cymryd y wleidyddiaeth allan o'r peth os mae'n mynd trwy'r ffi drwydded, efallai, ond nid ydw i'n siŵr os ydw i'n cytuno â hynny. Beth yw eich prif ddadl chi ynglŷn ag efallai nad yw'n rhywbeth mor ddelfrydol â hynny?
English: Well, what's fundamentally important to us is the amount of money that we receive, and the fact that it is allocated for a long period of time. That's what's described under this new regime - a regime whereby the funding will be decided over a period of five years, and there will no intervention during those five years, and that this argument, that, at the moment, the funding provided by DCMS can be changed every two years, to all intents and purposes, and certainly every time there's a spending review - that that does create political problems, and that isn't desirable. So, in having stability, although it might be nice to have permanent stability from more than one source, that pledge is valuable in and of itself.
Welsh: Wel, yr hyn sy'n sylfaenol i ni, wrth gwrs, yw swm yr arian sy'n cael ei dderbyn, a'r ffaith ei fod o'n cael ei glustnodi am gyfnod hir. Dyna sy'n cael ei ddisgrifio yn y drefn newydd - trefn lle bydd yr arian yn cael ei benderfynu am gyfnod o bum mlynedd, ac na fydd yna ymyrraeth yn ystod y pum mlynedd yna, a bod y ddadl yma, sef, ar hyn o bryd, bod yr arian sy'n dod gan DCMS yn gallu cael ei newid bob dwy flynedd bron, yn sicr bob tro mae yna spending review - bod hynny yn creu problemau gwleidyddol, ac nad ydy hynny'n beth dymunol. Felly, o gael sefydlogrwydd, er efallai byddai fe'n braf gael sefydlogrwydd parhaol o fwy nag un ffynhonnell, mae'r sefydlogrwydd a'r addewid yna yn werthfawr ynddo ei hun.
English: Just in terms of the lottery, do you think the decision not to continue with it was made quickly enough? I know you're new in the role, but perhaps Huw Jones can respond. Could you foresee that this was going to be something that wasn't going to be a success? Or when did you see the signals?
Welsh: Jest o ran y loteri, a ydych chi'n credu bod y penderfyniad i beidio â chario ymlaen â hi wedi cael ei wneud yn ddigon cyflym? Rydw i'n gwybod eich bod chi'n newydd yn y rôl, ond efallai fod Huw Jones yn gallu ymateb. A oeddech chi'n gweld bod hyn yn mynd i fod yn rhywbeth nad oedd yn mynd i fod yn llwyddiant? Neu pryd oeddech chi'n gweld y signalau?
English: Well, that was a difficult question because the launch of the lottery was disappointing. Loteri Cymru's launch didn't garner the attention that everyone had hoped it would. And the funds pledged that would be spent on marketing wasn't spent either. Then there was a time when there was an intention and a desire to increase marketing to see whether things would improve. That was done and there was some success, but not enough, and then there was a desire to bring other partners into the lottery. So, we gave time for that to happen too. So, I think that the board did make reasonable decisions, because there were some signs that there were numerous people playing the game but not enough of them. But at the end of the day, a decision had to be taken at the commercial board that the board wouldn't fund the lottery any further.
Welsh: Wel, roedd o'n gwestiwn anodd achos mi oedd lawnsiad y loteri yn siomedig. Ni chafodd y lawnsiad ddim y sylw roedd pawb wedi gobeithio y byddai'n ei gael. A chafodd yr arian a oedd wedi cael ei addo i gael ei wario ar farchnata ddim ei wario. Wedyn mi oedd yna gyfnod pan oedd yna fwriad ac awydd i gynyddu'r marchnata i weld a fyddai pethau'n gwella. Mi wnaethpwyd hynny ac mi gafwyd rhywfaint o lwyddiant, ond dim digon, ac wedyn mi oedd yna awydd i geisio cael partneriaid eraill i ddod i mewn i'r loteri. Felly, mi roddwyd amser i hynny ddigwydd hefyd. Felly, rydw i'n meddwl bod y bwrdd wedi gwneud penderfyniadau rhesymol, achos mi oedd yna arwyddion bod yna chwaraewyr niferus yn chwarae'r gêm ond dim digon ohonyn nhw. Ond ar ddiwedd y dydd, mi oedd yn rhaid gwneud y penderfyniad yn y bwrdd masnachol nad oedd y bwrdd masnachol yn mynd i ariannu'r loteri ymhellach.
English: Questions about the new unitary board and what about the arrangements coming on with the unitary board: what is the timetable? You've mentioned introducing a shadow board in the autumn.
Welsh: Cwestiynau ynglŷn â'r bwrdd unedol newydd a sut mae'r trefniadau yn dod yn eu blaen efo'r rheini: beth ydy'r amserlen? Rydych chi wedi sôn am gyflwyno bwrdd unedol cysgodol yn yr hydref.
English: Well, our intention, in agreement with DCMS, is to move towards the creation of a shadow board in the autumn and to operate as though that shadow board were formally in existence, if you like. We don't see any difficulty in that regard. What it does mean is that we will need to agree on the number of non-executive directors and how many executive directors there will be. Our theory is that, although this hasn't been agreed as of yet, there will be six non-executive directors and three executive directors. So, we will then rewrite our standing orders in order to define the process of decision making when decisions are made formally. Generally speaking, there aren't many occasions where votes would happen within the current authority and lead officials already attend those meetings. So, in practical terms, we don't anticipate any fundamental change in our processes, but everyone will need to understand who is an executive director and who hasn't - sorry, I'll reword: we will have to be clear who has voting rights if there is to be a formal vote, whilst we exist as a shadow board, if you like. But what I would like to do is to operate, in principle, as if we were a real shadow board, if you like.
Welsh: Wel, ein bwriad ni, mewn cytundeb â DCMS, yw symud i greu bwrdd cysgodol yn yr hydref a gweithredu fel petai y bwrdd cysgodol yn bodoli'n ffurfiol, os liciwch chi. Nid ydym yn gweld anhawster yn hynny o beth. Beth mae o'n ei olygu ydy cytuno ar nifer y cyfarwyddwyr anweithredol sydd yna a faint o gyfarwyddwyr gweithredol. Ein damcaniaeth ni, er nad ydy hyn wedi cael ei gytuno eto, ydy y bydd yna chwech cyfarwyddwr anweithredol a thri chyfarwyddwr gweithredol. Mi fyddwn ni wedyn yn ad-drefnu neu'n ailwampio ein rheolau sefydlog er mwyn diffinio beth yw'r broses o wneud penderfyniadau pan mae penderfyniadau'n cael eu gwneud yn ffurfiol. Ar y cyfan, nid oes yna lawer o adegau pan mae pleidleisiau yn digwydd o fewn yr awdurdod presennol ac mae prif swyddogion eisoes yn mynychu'r cyfarfodydd. Felly, yn ymarferol, nid ydym yn rhagweld y bydd yna newid sylfaenol yn ein prosesau ni, ond bydd yn rhaid i bawb ddeall pwy sydd yn gyfarwyddwr gweithredol a phwy sydd ddim wedi cael yr - sori, fe wnaf ailddweud hyn: bydd raid inni fod yn glir pwy sydd â'r hawl i bleidleisio, os oes yna bleidlais ffurfiol, tra rydym ni'n bodoli fel bwrdd cysgodol, os liciwch chi. Ond beth fyddwn ni'n dymuno ei wneud fydd gweithredu, mewn egwyddor, fel petai ni'n fwrdd cysgodol go iawn.
English: And will the current members of the S4C authority transfer automatically to be non-executive directors?
Welsh: Ac a fydd aelodau presennol awdurdod S4C yn trosglwyddo'n awtomatig i fod y gyfarwyddwyr anweithredol yma?
English: Yes, they will. That question was asked during the interview process for the new members and the response was given to them by the official from DCMS that they wouldn't have to reapply for those posts - they will transfer automatically.
Welsh: Byddant, mi fyddan nhw. Mi ofynnwyd y cwestiwn yna yn ystod y cyfweliadau ar gyfer yr aelodau newydd ac mi roddwyd yr ateb iddyn nhw gan y swyddog o'r DCMS na fyddai angen iddyn nhw ailymgeisio am eu swyddi - mi fyddan nhw'n trosglwyddo'n awtomatig.
English: There are three new ones -
Welsh: Mae yna dri newydd -
English: There are three new ones that have been announced this week.
Welsh: Tri newydd, oes, wedi'u cyhoeddi yr wythnos yma.