English: Some really good words across the Chamber. I did smile at the UKIP Member's reference to 'so-called human rights'. Well, human rights are human rights. And I disagree with the phrase 'minority rights'; I would, preferably, say 'rights for all'. Everybody needs to be respected and everybody should have a right, because, when everybody is respected, that brings harmony to our society. The legislation that is the subject of the amendments is the Violence Against Women, Domestic Abuse and Sexual Violence (Wales) Act 2015. Well, a very obvious question from me is: what about men? What about boys? And what about a bit of equality? The legislation says that violence against women and girls means gender-based violence, domestic abuse and sexual violence where the victim is female. Well, one in three victims are male, they're men, and 10 per cent - only 10 per cent - of men will report domestic abuse. I deal with a lot of casework with lots of fathers coming into the surgery who are victims of domestic abuse, and it's very difficult in south Wales to get men recognised as such, and it's taken my intervention in a number of cases to get those people classified as victims. There's nowhere in this city, or region in fact, to send those people for non-judgemental support - nowhere. Men are assessed because they're classified as perpetrators because we are male, and no other reason. The commission has issued a legal opinion stating that this is discrimination, and I would ask the Government if they're going to move on that. The Cabinet Secretary said two weeks ago that two women per week are victims of murder through domestic violence. In fact, the figure of two a week includes men, and the breakdown is 29 males and 79 females for 2015-16. You also said that we need to get our priorities right. Now, are those 29 people not a priority? Of course, it's a UK figure. Are men and boys not a priority? They should be, so I would ask you if you want to include them in your list of priorities, as you've said. I'm here elected to represent everybody. It doesn't matter what your gender is, whether you're male, female or no gender or transgender. I'm here to represent you, and we all are, and we should all speak out against discrimination. Domestic violence affects everyone, can affect everyone - all classes, all occupations, and it's something that needs to be recognised. I do want to touch on what Mohammad Asghar said about Islamophobia - some great words there. And I think it was John Griffiths who mentioned black people, people of colour. I would ask all Assembly Members to walk around this Assembly and see whether you can find many persons of colour who don't work in security or don't wok in cleansing. There are not many people at all. That's something this Assembly needs to address, and I hope the Government will come forward with proposals to do that. If you look at the walk-to-work area around this Assembly - Butetown, Riverside, Grangetown - it's the most diverse area in Wales, and you will not see that reflected in the people employed here behind the scenes in this Assembly, unless you're talking about cleansing and security. So, I think that's something that really needs to be worked on and there's an effort to be made. I just go back to my original point, really, because it really is high time - high time - that it is recognised that men can be victims of domestic violence as well. Some of us know that all too well. Diolch yn fawr.
Welsh: Dyna eiriau da iawn o ochr arall y Siambr. Fe wnes i wenu pan wnaeth yr aelod o UKIP gyfeirio at 'hawliau dynol honedig'. Wel, mae hawliau dynol yn hawliau dynol. Ac rwy'n anghytuno â'r ymadrodd 'hawliau lleiafrifoedd'; buaswn i, gorau oll, yn dweud 'hawliau i bawb'. Mae angen parchu pawb a dylai pawb gael hawl, oherwydd, pan fydd pawb yn cael eu parchu, daw hynny â chytgord i'n cymdeithas. Y ddeddfwriaeth sy'n destun y diwygiadau yw Deddf Trais yn erbyn Menywod, Cam-drin Domestig a Thrais Rhywiol (Cymru) 2015. Wel, cwestiwn amlwg iawn gen i yw: beth am ddynion? Beth am fechgyn? A beth am ychydig o gydraddoldeb? Mae'r ddeddfwriaeth yn dweud bod trais yn erbyn menywod a merched yn golygu trais ar sail rhyw, cam-drin domestig a thrais rhywiol lle mae dioddefwyr yn fenywod. Wel, mae un o bob tri dioddefwr yn ddyn, dynion ydyn nhw, a 10 y cant - dim ond 10 y cant - o ddynion fydd yn rhoi gwybod am gam-drin domestig. Rwy'n ymwneud â llawer o waith achos gyda llawer o dadau yn dod i'r feddygfa sy'n dioddef cam-drin domestig, ac mae'n anodd iawn yn y De i gael dynion wedi eu cydnabod fel y cyfryw, a dim ond drwy imi ymyrryd mewn nifer o achosion y llwyddwyd i gydnabod y bobl hynny fel dioddefwyr. Nid oes unman yn y ddinas hon, neu yn y rhanbarth hwn i ddweud y gwir, i anfon y bobl hynny i gael cymorth anfeirniadol - dim un man. Asesir dynion oherwydd maen nhw'n cael eu cyfrif fel y rhai sy'n cyflawni'r trais oherwydd mai dynion ydym ni, a dim rheswm arall. Mae'r Comisiwn wedi cyhoeddi barn gyfreithiol sy'n datgan mai gwahaniaethu yw hyn, a byddaf yn gofyn i'r Llywodraeth a ydynt yn bwriadu symud ymlaen o ran hynny. Bythefnos yn ôl, dywedodd Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet bod dwy fenyw yr wythnos yn cael eu llofruddio drwy drais yn y cartref. Mewn gwirionedd, mae'r ffigur o ddau yr wythnos yn cynnwys dynion, a'r dadansoddiad yw 29 dyn a 79 menyw ar gyfer 2015-6. Dywedasoch hefyd fod angen inni gael ein blaenoriaethau'n iawn. Nawr, onid yw'r 29 person hynny'n flaenoriaeth? Wrth gwrs, mae hwn yn ffigur ar gyfer y DU. Onid yw dynion a bechgyn yn flaenoriaeth? Dylen nhw fod, felly rwy'n gofyn ichi a ydych chi eisiau eu cynnwys nhw yn eich rhestr o flaenoriaethau, fel yr ydych chi wedi dweud. Rwyf wedi fy ethol yma i gynrychioli pawb. Does dim ots beth yw eich rhyw, p'un a ydych chi'n wryw, benyw neu heb ryw neu yn drawsryweddol. Rwyf yma i'ch cynrychioli chi, ac mae hynny'n wir am bob un ohonom ni, a dylem ni i gyd siarad yn erbyn gwahaniaethu. Mae trais domestig yn effeithio ar bawb, gall effeithio ar bawb - pob dosbarth, pob galwedigaeth, ac mae'n rhywbeth y mae angen ei gydnabod. Rwyf eisiau sôn am yr hyn a ddywedodd Mohammad Asghar am Islamoffobia - roedd yna rai sylwadau gwych ganddo. A chredaf mai John Griffiths a soniodd am bobl groenddu, pobl groendywyll. Rwy'n gofyn i holl Aelodau'r Cynulliad gerdded o amgylch y Cynulliad hwn a gweld a allwch chi ddod o hyd i lawer o bobl groendywyll nad ydyn nhw'n gweithio yn y maes diogelwch neu lanhau. Does dim llawer o bobl o gwbl. Mae hynny'n rhywbeth y mae angen i'r Cynulliad hwn roi sylw iddo, ac rwy'n gobeithio y bydd y Llywodraeth yn cyflwyno cynigion i wneud hynny. Os edrychwch chi ar yr ardal gerdded i'r gwaith o amgylch y Cynulliad hwn - Butetown, Glan yr Afon, Grangetown - hi yw'r ardal fwyaf amrywiol yng Nghymru, ond ni welwch chi hynny'n cael ei adlewyrchu yn y bobl a gyflogir yma y tu ôl i'r llenni yn y Cynulliad hwn, oni bai eich bod chi'n sôn am lanhau a diogelwch. Felly, rwy'n credu bod hynny'n rhywbeth y mae gwir angen gweithio arno a dylid gwneud yr ymdrech. Rwy'n dychwelyd at fy mhwynt gwreiddiol, mewn gwirionedd, oherwydd mae'n hen bryd - yn hen bryd - cydnabod y gall dynion fod yn ddioddefwyr trais domestig hefyd. Mae rhai ohonom ni'n gwybod hynny yn iawn. Diolch yn fawr.