techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I'm almost out of time. There is the will for community involvement in town regeneration and progression in Aberconwy, but residents are facing barriers. Consequently, I support the calls on the Welsh Government to establish seaside town and market town funds. You've got the levers, you've even got the money. Just, please, work with our business owners, and together in that partnership we'll have far more money for our public services. Entrepreneurship, employment and ambition - that's what Wales needs, and it's sadly lacking at the moment.
Welsh: Mae fy amser bron ar ben. Mae yna ewyllys i gynnwys cymunedau yn y gwaith o adfywio a datblygu trefi yn Aberconwy, ond mae trigolion yn wynebu rhwystrau. O ganlyniad, rwy'n cefnogi'r galwadau ar Lywodraeth Cymru i sefydlu cronfeydd ar gyfer trefi glan môr a threfi marchnad. Mae'r dulliau gennych, mae'r arian gennych hyd yn oed. Os gwelwch yn dda, gweithiwch gyda'n perchnogion busnesau, a chyda'n gilydd yn y bartneriaeth honno bydd gennym lawer mwy o arian ar gyfer ein gwasanaethau cyhoeddus. Entrepreneuriaeth, cyflogaeth ac uchelgais - dyna sydd ei angen ar Gymru, ac yn anffodus mae'n brin ohonynt ar hyn o bryd.
English: Thank you. The proposal is to agree the motion without amendment. Does any Member object? [ Objection.] So, we will defer voting on this item until voting time.
Welsh: Diolch. Y cwestiwn yw a ddylid derbyn y cynnig heb ei ddiwygio. A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? [ Gwrthwynebiad.] Felly, gohiriwn y pleidleisio ar yr eitem hon tan y cyfnod pleidleisio.
English: We move to item 8 on the agenda this afternoon, which is Plaid Cymru's debate on low-income families, and I call on Adam Price to move the motion.
Welsh: Symudwn at eitem 8 ar yr agenda y prynhawn yma, sef dadl Plaid Cymru ar deuluoedd incwm isel, a galwaf ar Adam Price i gyflwyno'r cynnig.
English: You may indeed be right, and I welcome the comprehensive way in which you've gone through some of the policies there that lie with Westminster. You may well be right that they will not change, but it is interesting that some of those MPs elected in former Labour areas are now going to have constituents washing up into their surgeries who will confront them with the realities of this. So, I don't think we should give up hope, if this Assembly were to send a concerted message to Westminster in the budget that is due in March, to actually look at those issues over (1) the vulnerable constituents who are on welfare, and what would be needed to redress some of that, but, secondly, the simple old fact of making work pay.
Welsh: Efallai eich bod yn iawn, a chroesawaf y ffordd gynhwysfawr yr aethoch drwy rai o'r polisïau sydd gan San Steffan. Efallai eich bod yn iawn na fyddant yn newid, ond mae'n ddiddorol fod rhai o'r ASau hynny a etholwyd mewn ardaloedd Llafur yn flaenorol yn mynd i gael etholwyr yn heidio i'w cymorthfeydd yn awr gan ddangos realiti hyn yn glir iddynt. Felly, nid wyf yn credu y dylem anobeithio, pe bai'r Cynulliad hwn yn anfon neges gydunol i San Steffan yn y gyllideb sydd i ddod ym mis Mawrth, i edrych ar y materion hynny mewn perthynas ag (1) yr etholwyr agored i niwed sydd ar fudd-daliadau, a'r hyn y byddai ei angen i unioni rhywfaint o hynny, ond yn ail, yr hen ffaith syml o wneud i waith dalu.
English: Thank you for taking an intervention. I just want to ask you: I agree that we need to alleviate child poverty, of course I do, but I'm looking at The Oxford Review of Economic Policy in 2010 and I have to right a statement that you said, that Labour in power - . Between 1996 when we took power and 2010 when we left power, there was a massive decrease in poverty for pensioners, for families with children, and for the children themselves. The question I want to ask is - . That's attributed - and I can send you a link to the article, since you don't seem to know about it - to being because of the increase that we put purposely into the benefits system as opposed to the decrease that has happened. So, we do need to take account of the levers that we have, but recognise at the same time the levers that we don't have and are visited upon us.
Welsh: Diolch ichi am dderbyn ymyriad. Hoffwn ofyn i chi: rwy'n cytuno bod angen inni liniaru tlodi plant, wrth gwrs fy mod, ond rwy'n edrych ar The Oxford Review of Economic Policy yn 2010 ac mae'n rhaid imi gywiro datganiad a wnaethoch, sef bod Llafur mewn grym - . Rhwng 1996 pan ddaethom i rym a 2010 pan adawsom, cafwyd gostyngiad enfawr mewn tlodi i bensiynwyr, i deuluoedd â phlant, ac i'r plant eu hunain. Y cwestiwn rwyf am ei ofyn yw - . Mae hynny wedi'i briodoli - a gallaf anfon dolen atoch i'r erthygl, gan nad ydych fel pe baech yn gwybod amdani - i'r cynnydd yn yr arian a roesom tuag at y system fudd-daliadau yn hytrach na'r gostyngiad sydd wedi digwydd. Felly, mae angen inni ystyried y dulliau sydd gennym, a chydnabod ar yr un pryd y dulliau nad ydynt yn ein dwylo ni ac sy'n effeithio arnom.
English: I entirely agree with you. The case that I'm making is, look, we should create our own instrument because, as the biggest systematic review in this area by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation has said, income support policies like a Welsh child payment are the ultimate multipurpose policy instrument because of their cumulative impact across so many parts of children's and families' lives. The Equality, Communities and Local Government Committee have suggested that the Welsh Government asks for the power to create new benefits. That means that we could do what the Scottish Government is doing later this year. I think, you know, the kind of figures that we're talking about, lifting tens of thousands of children out of poverty immediately, that would be one of the biggest impacts that Welsh Government could have on the lives of so many people, and I would urge Members to support the spirit of this motion. Let's get on with actually reaching that target of abolishing child poverty that was set 20 years ago.
Welsh: Cytunaf yn llwyr â chi. Yr achos rwy'n ei wneud, edrychwch, yw y dylem greu ein hofferyn ein hunain oherwydd, fel y dywedodd yr adolygiad systematig mwyaf yn y maes hwn gan Sefydliad Joseph Rowntree, polisïau cymorth incwm fel taliad plant Cymru yw'r offerynnau polisi amlbwrpas gorau oherwydd eu heffaith gronnol ar draws cymaint o agweddau ar fywydau plant a theuluoedd. Mae'r Pwyllgor Cydraddoldeb, Cymunedau a Llywodraeth Leol wedi awgrymu bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn gofyn am y pŵer i greu budd-daliadau newydd. Mae hynny'n golygu y gallem wneud yr hyn y mae Llywodraeth yr Alban yn ei wneud yn ddiweddarach eleni. Rwy'n meddwl, wyddoch chi, y math o ffigurau rydym yn sôn amdanynt, codi degau o filoedd o blant allan o dlodi ar unwaith, dyna fyddai un o'r effeithiau mwyaf y gallai Llywodraeth Cymru ei chael ar fywydau cymaint o bobl, a hoffwn annog yr Aelodau i gefnogi ysbryd y cynnig hwn. Gadewch inni fwrw ati i gyrraedd y targed o ddileu tlodi plant a osodwyd 20 mlynedd yn ôl.
English: Thank you. I have selected the amendment to the motion and I call on the Deputy Minister for Housing and Local Government to move amendment 1 formally, tabled in the name of Rebecca Evans.
Welsh: Diolch. Rwyf wedi dethol y gwelliant i'r cynnig a galwaf ar y Dirprwy Weinidog Tai a Llywodraeth Leol i gynnig gwelliant 1, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Rebecca Evans, yn ffurfiol.
English: - of funding from the UK Government to support those who would need the welfare system. I really want to make my points, but briefly, yes.
Welsh: - o gyllid gan Lywodraeth y DU i gefnogi'r rhai a fyddai angen y system les. Rwy'n awyddus iawn i wneud fy mhwyntiau, ond yn fyr, iawn.
English: I'm just not clear from your argument whether you're in favour of the devolution of administration of benefits or you're against it.
Welsh: Nid yw'n glir o'ch dadl a ydych o blaid datganoli gweinyddu budd-daliadau neu yn erbyn.
English: I'll come to that point, if I may.
Welsh: Fe ddof at y pwynt hwnnw, os caf.
English: It's a fairly simple question.
Welsh: Mae'n gwestiwn eithaf syml.
English: In fact, it could leave less support for impacted citizens. I'll continue to the point that you make. Welsh Labour cannot be agents for the Tory UK Government in Wales. To have administrative control in certain areas would mean implementing policies that we fundamentally disagree with, knowing the damage that they would cause to the most vulnerable in society on their behalf. Once again, Plaid Cymru are willing to let the Tory UK Government off the hook by calling on the Welsh Government to make up the funding shortfall caused directly by Tory austerity and welfare reforms. If Plaid Cymru practically want to help children in Wales - and that's the point, practically - on low incomes, then they know how they can do this: you can support, and welcome, and elucidate, and broadcast to the public the measures, our anti-poverty measures, in the Welsh Labour Government's draft budget. [ Interruption.] This would be - [ Interruption.] This would be mature politics. [ Interruption. ] You know that the Welsh Labour Government's budget includes - and I'm not going to read out the draft proposals; I won't go there. You know that Welsh Labour will continue to fight this, both in sickness and in health, because we believe in supporting and not harming our citizens. So, deputy chair, it is Tory policies that have cemented and created the deepest poverty in a century, and it is Welsh Labour that will continue to fight it practically on the ground.
Welsh: Mewn gwirionedd, gallai olygu llai o gefnogaeth i ddinasyddion yr effeithir arnynt. Fe ddof at y pwynt rydych yn ei wneud. Ni all Llafur Cymru fod yn asiantau ar ran Llywodraeth Dorïaidd y DU yng Nghymru. Byddai cael rheolaeth weinyddol mewn meysydd penodol yn golygu gweithredu polisïau rydym yn anghytuno'n sylfaenol â hwy, gan wybod am y niwed y byddent yn ei achosi i'r rhai mwyaf agored i niwed mewn cymdeithas ar eu rhan. Unwaith eto, mae Plaid Cymru yn barod i achub croen Llywodraeth Dorïaidd y DU drwy alw ar Lywodraeth Cymru i wneud iawn am y diffyg cyllid a achoswyd yn uniongyrchol gan gyni a diwygiadau lles y Torïaid. Os yw Plaid Cymru am helpu plant yng Nghymru sydd ar incwm isel yn ymarferol - a dyna'r pwynt, yn ymarferol - fe wyddant sut y gallant wneud hyn: gallwch gefnogi, a chroesawu, ac egluro, a chyfleu i'r cyhoedd y mesurau, ein mesurau gwrth-dlodi, yng nghyllideb ddrafft Llywodraeth Lafur Cymru. [ Torri ar draws.] Byddai hyn yn - [ T orri ar draws.] Gwleidyddiaeth aeddfed fyddai hyn. [ Torri ar draws. ] Fe wyddoch fod cyllideb Llywodraeth Lafur Cymru yn cynnwys - ac nid wyf yn mynd i ddarllen y cynigion drafft; nid wyf am wneud hynny. Fe wyddoch y bydd Llafur Cymru yn parhau i frwydro yn erbyn hyn, yn glaf ac yn iach, oherwydd ein bod yn credu mewn cefnogi a pheidio â niweidio ein dinasyddion. Felly, ddirprwy gadeirydd, polisïau Torïaidd sydd wedi atgyfnerthu a chreu'r tlodi dyfnaf mewn canrif, a Llafur Cymru fydd yn parhau i'w ymladd yn ymarferol ar lawr gwlad.
English: I would like to thank Plaid Cymru for proposing this debate, which, once again, reiterates the issues facing families that were raised in the Welsh Conservative debate on local communities earlier. Speaking to the Welsh Government's amendment, it is, unfortunately, predictable that, once again, it has tried to shift the blame for its own failure to reduce inequality in Wales, instead rehearsing its own tired argument of austerity, rather than taking responsibility for its own actions.
Welsh: Hoffwn ddiolch i Blaid Cymru am gyflwyno'r ddadl hon, sydd, unwaith eto, yn ailadrodd y problemau sy'n wynebu teuluoedd a grybwyllwyd yn nadl y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig ar gymunedau lleol yn gynharach. Gan siarad am welliant Llywodraeth Cymru, mae'n rhagweladwy, gwaetha'r modd, ei fod unwaith eto wedi ceisio symud y bai am ei methiant ei hun i leihau anghydraddoldeb yng Nghymru, gan ailadrodd ei dadl dreuliedig ei hun am gyni yn lle hynny, yn hytrach nag ysgwyddo cyfrifoldeb am ei gweithredoedd ei hun.
English: No. Sorry, I've got a lot to get through. The fact is, Wales has had a Labour Government in power since 1999, arguably propped up in the past also by Plaid Cymru. But, what progress has been made? A recent report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation shows that, of the four countries of the UK, Wales has consistently had the highest poverty rate for the past 20 years. Even before the financial crash, figures show that Wales had the highest child-poverty levels in the UK: 29 per cent in 2007 and 32 per cent in 2008. Meanwhile, End Child Poverty show that Wales was the only nation in the UK to see a rise in the level of child poverty, with 29.3 per cent of children living in poverty in 2017-18. Almost £500 million was spent on Communities First, yet the Bevan Foundation found that it did not reduce the headline rates of poverty in the vast majority of communities, still less in Wales as a whole. The October 2018 Bevan Foundation briefing on poverty in Wales reported that Wales had the highest population of individuals in poverty before housing costs in the UK. Between 2014 and 2017, the proportion of working-age adults in poverty in Wales was higher than in any other UK nation, and the pensioner-poverty rate in Wales was far higher than in the other UK nations. This, of course, has been compounded by Wales having the lowest wages and highest level of non-permanent employment contracts across Great Britain.
Welsh: Na wnaf. Mae'n ddrwg gennyf, mae gennyf lawer i fynd drwyddo. Y gwir amdani yw bod Llywodraeth Lafur wedi bod mewn grym yng Nghymru ers 1999, wedi'i chynnal yn y gorffennol, gellid dadlau, gan Blaid Cymru hefyd. Ond pa gynnydd a wnaed? Mae adroddiad diweddar gan Sefydliad Joseph Rowntree yn dangos, o bedair gwlad y DU, mai Cymru sydd wedi bod â'r gyfradd dlodi uchaf yn gyson ers 20 mlynedd. Hyd yn oed cyn y cwymp ariannol, dengys ffigurau mai yng Nghymru roedd y lefelau uchaf o dlodi plant yn y DU: 29 y cant yn 2007 a 32 y cant yn 2008. Yn y cyfamser, mae Dileu Tlodi Plant yn dangos mai Cymru oedd yr unig wlad yn y DU i weld cynnydd yn lefel tlodi plant, gyda 29.3 y cant o blant yn byw mewn tlodi yn 2017-18. Gwariwyd bron i £500 miliwn ar Cymunedau yn Gyntaf, ond canfu Sefydliad Bevan na wnaeth ostwng prif gyfraddau tlodi yn y mwyafrif llethol o gymunedau, a llai fyth yng Nghymru gyfan. Ym mis Hydref 2018 nododd papur briffio Sefydliad Bevan ar dlodi yng Nghymru mai Cymru oedd â'r boblogaeth fwyaf o unigolion yn byw mewn tlodi yn y DU cyn cyfrif costau tai. Rhwng 2014 a 2017, roedd cyfran yr oedolion o oedran gweithio a oedd yn byw mewn tlodi yng Nghymru yn uwch nag mewn unrhyw wlad arall yn y DU, ac roedd y gyfradd tlodi ymhlith pensiynwyr yng Nghymru yn llawer uwch nag yng ngwledydd eraill y DU. Mae hyn, wrth gwrs, wedi'i waethygu gan y ffaith mai gan Gymru y mae'r cyflogau isaf a'r lefel uchaf o gontractau cyflogaeth nad ydynt yn barhaol ym Mhrydain gyfan.
English: Go on, yes.
Welsh: Iawn, o'r gorau.
English: I'm very grateful. Thank you. I don't disagree with what you said, but would you also acknowledge the impact of the benefit changes, as Adam Price outlined in his speech? And can I ask you, as a person who I know is a principled Conservative, to go back to your fellow Conservative Members in London and ask them to get rid of the two-child rule, what we call the 'rape clause'? It's appallingly cruel. Whatever we think about the parents' behaviour, that third child is not responsible for the fact that it was born into a poor family. Can I please ask you to do that? Because I actually believe you do care about this, but I think many of your colleagues in London do not understand the impact of that terrible rule. For a woman to have to claim that she was raped by her husband to be able to get money for her third child is surely something with which you, personally, cannot agree?
Welsh: Rwy'n ddiolchgar iawn. Diolch. Nid wyf yn anghytuno â'r hyn a ddywedoch chi, ond a fyddech hefyd yn cydnabod effaith y newidiadau i fudd-daliadau, fel yr amlinellodd Adam Price yn ei araith? Ac a gaf fi ofyn i chi, fel rhywun y gwn ei bod yn Geidwadwr egwyddorol, i fynd yn ôl at eich cyd-aelodau Ceidwadol yn Llundain a gofyn iddynt gael gwared â'r rheol dau blentyn, yr hyn a alwn yn 'gymal trais'? Mae'n arswydus o greulon. Beth bynnag yw ein barn am ymddygiad y rhieni, nid y trydydd plentyn sy'n gyfrifol am y ffaith ei fod wedi'i eni i deulu tlawd. A gaf fi ofyn i chi wneud hynny os gwelwch yn dda? Oherwydd rwy'n credu o ddifrif eich bod yn poeni am hyn, ond rwy'n meddwl nad yw llawer o'ch cydweithwyr yn Llundain yn deall effaith y rheol ofnadwy honno. Does bosibl eich bod chi'n cytuno bod yn rhaid i fenyw orfod honni iddi gael ei threisio gan ei gŵr er mwyn gallu cael arian ar gyfer ei thrydydd plentyn?
English: Yes. However, if we are to tackle these issues then we must focus on long-term outcomes, rather than short-term inputs, and empowering individuals and communities to co-design local services that meet their needs. Thanks to Plaid Cymru for your debate today.
Welsh: Ydw. Fodd bynnag, os ydym am fynd i'r afael â'r materion hyn, rhaid inni ganolbwyntio ar ganlyniadau hirdymor, yn hytrach na mewnbynnau tymor byr, a grymuso unigolion a chymunedau i gyd-gynllunio gwasanaethau lleol sy'n diwallu eu hanghenion. Diolch i Blaid Cymru am eich dadl heddiw.
English: Just briefly. I wonder if he's had time to reflect on one of the more radical proposals or discussions that came up, which was: if the union continues as the union is, then it seems that this swimming upstream against what the UK Government does is just not a parity of esteem, a respect of what's going on, isn't a fit with our policies. So, it would be interesting to see if, on the joint ministerial mechanisms and so on, there is a way of incorporating welfare and the benefits and social security system within that. So, if Ministers at the UK end were to put forward some radical proposals, we could say to them, 'Well, I'll tell you what it'll do in Wales, so we want some compensatory mechanism to actually deal with that'. Now, I'm not saying this would happen, but what does he think of it?
Welsh: Yn fyr. Tybed a yw wedi cael amser i fyfyrio ar un o'r cynigion mwy radical neu drafodaethau a gododd, sef: os yw'r undeb yn parhau fel y mae, ymddengys nad yw nofio yn erbyn y llif fel hyn yn erbyn yr hyn a wna Llywodraeth y DU yn barch cydradd, yn parchu'r hyn sy'n digwydd, yn cydweddu â'n polisïau. Felly, byddai'n ddiddorol gweld, ar fecanweithiau'r cyd-Weinidogion ac yn y blaen, a oes ffordd o ymgorffori lles a budd-daliadau a'r system nawdd cymdeithasol o fewn hynny. Felly, pe bai Gweinidogion y DU yn cyflwyno cynigion radical, gallem ddweud wrthynt, 'Wel, fe ddywedaf wrthych beth fydd yn ei wneud yng Nghymru, felly mae arnom eisiau rhyw fecanwaith digolledu i ymdrin â hynny mewn gwirionedd'. Nawr, nid wyf yn dweud y byddai hyn yn digwydd, ond beth mae'n ei feddwl o hynny?
English: Well, I thank my colleague Huw for that intervention. We do look at that in the report, as you know, Huw, and I know you were very keen on exploring that approach during the work of the committee. So, we do recognise the need to look at a stronger Welsh voice. I'm sure, when we come to debate the report, that you will take part and we'll hear perhaps various views on that. But, you know, along with a stronger Welsh voice in the system as it currently exists, we do need to look at devolution, as I've described - and, indeed, beyond. And as I say, all of that is set out in the report. We'll have the Welsh Government response and a debate in due course, but I do believe that these are matters that need to be very carefully considered and explored, given the importance of welfare benefit payments to some of the very poorest people and poorest families in our communities. If we didn't take a serious look at these matters, I don't believe we would be best serving those communities.
Welsh: Wel, hoffwn ddiolch i fy nghyd-Aelod, Huw, am yr ymyriad hwnnw. Rydym yn edrych ar hynny yn yr adroddiad, fel y gwyddoch, Huw, a gwn eich bod yn awyddus iawn i ystyried y dull hwnnw o weithredu yn ystod gwaith y pwyllgor. Felly, rydym yn cydnabod bod angen edrych ar lais cryfach yng Nghymru. Pan ddaw'n bryd inni drafod yr adroddiad, rwy'n siŵr y byddwch yn cymryd rhan ac y byddwn yn clywed safbwyntiau amrywiol ar hynny efallai. Ond wyddoch chi, ynghyd â llais Cymreig cryfach yn y system fel y mae'n bodoli ar hyn o bryd, mae angen inni edrych ar ddatganoli, fel y disgrifiais - a thu hwnt i hynny yn wir. Ac fel y dywedaf, mae hynny i gyd wedi'i nodi yn yr adroddiad. Cawn ymateb Llywodraeth Cymru a dadl maes o law, ond credaf fod y rhain yn faterion y mae angen eu hystyried a'u harchwilio'n ofalus iawn, o gofio pwysigrwydd taliadau budd-daliadau lles i rai o'r bobl dlotaf a'r teuluoedd tlotaf yn ein cymunedau. Pe na baem yn rhoi ystyriaeth ddifrifol i'r materion hyn, nid wyf yn credu y byddem yn gwasanaethu'r cymunedau hynny cystal ag y gallem.
English: The debate started with Rhianon Passmore focusing on the question of whether we have the power. I mean, when Rhodri Morgan decided that the Welsh Government was going to top up the child trust fund, I didn't see much discussion or soul searching then; it was the right thing to do and if you didn't have the power, you went and asked for it. And that's the Calman attitude now. And I think that you're behind the curve here a little bit, Rhianon, even within your own party, because I think John Griffiths reflected the evolution of thinking on the Labour Party side of this question. The fact that the Government has decided to hold back its response to the recommendations of the committee reports that relate to the devolution of welfare, because they want to actually get the response of the Wales Centre for Public Policy, I think reflects the fact that there is a change of thinking.
Welsh: Dechreuodd y ddadl gyda Rhianon Passmore yn canolbwyntio ar y cwestiwn a oes gennym y pŵer. Hynny yw, pan benderfynodd Rhodri Morgan fod Llywodraeth Cymru yn mynd i ychwanegu at y gronfa ymddiriedolaeth plant, ni welais lawer o drafod na hunanymholi bryd hynny; dyna oedd y peth iawn i'w wneud ac os nad oedd gennych chi'r pŵer, fe fyddech yn gofyn amdano. A dyna'r ymagwedd Calman yn awr. A chredaf eich bod ar ei hôl hi braidd, Rhianon, hyd yn oed o fewn eich plaid eich hun, oherwydd roedd John Griffiths yn adlewyrchu esblygiad meddwl ar ochr y Blaid Lafur i'r cwestiwn. Rwy'n credu bod y ffaith bod y Llywodraeth wedi penderfynu gohirio ei hymateb i argymhellion adroddiadau'r pwyllgor sy'n ymwneud â datganoli lles oherwydd eu bod eisiau cael ymateb Canolfan Polisi Cyhoeddus Cymru yn awgrymu bod yna newid meddwl.
English: Thank you. The proposal is to agree the motion without amendment. Does any Member object? [ Objection.] Therefore we defer voting under this item until voting time.
Welsh: Diolch. Y cwestiwn yw a ddylid derbyn y cynnig heb ei ddiwygio. A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? [ Gwrthwynebiad.] Felly, gohiriwn y bleidlais o dan yr eitem hon tan y cyfnod pleidleisio.
English: We have reached voting time. Unless three Members wish for the bell to be rung, I intend to proceed to the first vote. The first vote this afternoon, then, is on the Welsh Conservative debate on community regeneration. I now call for a vote on the motion, tabled in the name of Darren Millar. If the proposal is not agreed to, we vote on the amendment tabled to the motion. Open the vote. Close the vote. For the motion 11, one abstention, 37 against. Therefore, the motion is not agreed and we move to vote on the amendments.
Welsh: Rydym wedi cyrraedd y cyfnod pleidleisio. Oni bai fod tri Aelod yn dymuno i'r gloch gael ei chanu, rwy'n bwriadu symud ymlaen at y bleidlais gyntaf. Y bleidlais gyntaf y prynhawn yma, felly, yw'r un ar ddadl y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig ar adfywio cymunedol. Galwaf yn awr am bleidlais ar y cynnig a gyflwynwyd yn enw Darren Millar. Os na dderbynnir y cynnig, byddwn yn pleidleisio ar y gwelliant a gyflwynwyd i'r cynnig. Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid y cynnig 11, un yn ymatal, 37 yn erbyn. Felly, gwrthodwyd y cynnig a symudwn ymlaen i bleidleisio ar y gwelliannau.