English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. I don't think anybody will criticise this Bill for suffering from a lack of scrutiny as I step forward as the third in a triumvirate of committee Chairs. I do want to thank my fellow committee members for their assiduous scrutiny of this and their consistent assiduity in scrutinising the various Bills that come in front of us. We reported on this Bill on 10 February, and I'd like to briefly outline our findings just with a few remarks. But, before I do, I think it would be sensible just to reflect back on the work undertaken by our predecessor committee on a similar Bill in the fourth Assembly under our previous Chair, who's here with us today. When that predecessor committee reported on the Bill, it made nine recommendations to the then Minister for Health and Social Services, of which seven were accepted. The then Minister subsequently tabled amendments to give effect to those seven recommendations at Stage 2 and these were agreed by the fourth Assembly's Health and Social Care Committee. As the Minister has laid out, one of the principal differences between the Bill before us today and the one agreed at Stage 3 in the fourth Assembly is, of course, the removal of the restriction on the use of e-cigarettes in places such as hospitals, schools, shops, food establishments and on school and public transport, and the Minister has also referred to other changes within the Bill. In our view, on the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee, it may have been helpful and, indeed, more transparent if the explanatory memorandum had actually compared the two Bills and the differences that have come along simply for ease of understanding, not only for legislators but for members of the public as well. It may be something that we will want to look at in future, as well - it's simple to achieve; it would have helped members and stakeholders, as well as lay people, understand how thinking had moved on, and facilitated the scrutiny process for the benefit of Welsh citizens. One of our predecessor committee's recommendations to the Welsh Government was to require on the face of the legislation that public authorities would be the enforcement authorities. That recommendation was not accepted, and, in our scrutiny, we noted that the new Bill continued with the same approach. However, we are very pleased that, as a result of further work by the Government, the Minister told us it was indeed her intention to bring forward an amendment at Stage 2 to meet the recommendation of our predecessor committee. We very much welcome the Minister's decision and consider that this will strengthen the Bill by providing greater clarity. If I could turn now to the recommendation in our current report that relates to those enforcement authorities, we recommended that the Minister should table an amendment to the Bill to ensure that enforcement authorities are fully aware of their human rights obligations when, for example, entering people's homes. In particular, we suggested that this might be achieved through the issuing of guidance. We do believe that this would highlight the importance of human rights in discharging particularly the enforcement duties in a more effective way than could be achieved by a simple communications campaign. So, I wonder whether the Minister could perhaps further clarify her intentions on this recommendation. But, we do welcome the comments of the Minister today and also her active engagement - her positive engagement - with the work of the committee. She has engaged very positively and she's responded positively to the scrutiny of this committee and that of our predecessor committee, and we thank her for this - this is all good for the quality of the scrutiny within this institution.
Welsh: Diolch, Ddirprwy Lywydd. Nid wyf yn credu y bydd unrhyw un yn beirniadu'r Bil hwn am ddioddef o ddiffyg craffu wrth i mi gamu ymlaen fel y trydydd mewn triwriaeth o Gadeiryddion pwyllgorau. Hoffwn ddiolch i fy nghyd-aelodau pwyllgor am eu gwaith craffu diwyd ar hyn ac am eu diwydrwydd cyson wrth graffu ar yr amrywiol Filiau sy'n dod ger ein bron. Gwnaethom adrodd ar y Bil hwn ar 10 Chwefror, a hoffwn i amlinellu'n fras ein canfyddiadau gydag ychydig o sylwadau yn unig. Ond, cyn i mi wneud hynny, rwy'n credu y byddai'n gwneud synnwyr inni edrych yn ôl ar y gwaith a wnaed gan y pwyllgor a'n rhagflaenodd ar Fil tebyg yn y pedwerydd Cynulliad dan ein Cadeirydd blaenorol, sydd yma gyda ni heddiw. Pan adroddodd y pwyllgor a'n rhagflaenodd ar y Bil, gwnaeth naw argymhelliad i'r Gweinidog Iechyd a Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol, a chafodd saith ohonynt eu derbyn. Yna cyflwynodd y Gweinidog welliannau i weithredu'r saith argymhelliad hynny yng Nghyfnod 2 a chytunwyd ar y rhain gan Bwyllgor Iechyd a Gofal Cymdeithasol y pedwerydd Cynulliad. Fel y nododd y Gweinidog, un o'r prif wahaniaethau rhwng y Bil ger ein bron heddiw a'r un y cytunwyd arno yng Nghyfnod 3 yn y Pedwerydd Cynulliad, wrth gwrs, yw cael gwared ar y cyfyngiad ar y defnydd o e-sigaréts mewn mannau fel ysbytai, ysgolion, siopau, sefydliadau bwyd ac ar gludiant i'r ysgol a thrafnidiaeth gyhoeddus, ac mae'r Gweinidog hefyd wedi cyfeirio at newidiadau eraill yn y Bil. Yn ein barn ni, y Pwyllgor Materion Cyfansoddiadol a Deddfwriaethol, efallai y byddai wedi bod yn ddefnyddiol ac, yn wir, yn fwy tryloyw, pe byddai'r memorandwm esboniadol mewn gwirionedd wedi cymharu'r ddau Fil a'r gwahaniaethau sydd wedi dod i'r amlwg dim ond er hwylustod deall, nid yn unig i ddeddfwyr ond i aelodau'r cyhoedd hefyd. Gall fod yn rhywbeth y byddwn yn dymuno edrych arno yn y dyfodol hefyd - mae'n hawdd ei gyflawni; byddai wedi helpu aelodau a rhanddeiliaid, yn ogystal â lleygwyr, i ddeall sut mae syniadau wedi symud ymlaen, ac wedi hwyluso'r broses graffu er budd dinasyddion Cymru. Un o argymhellion y pwyllgor a'n rhagflaenodd i Lywodraeth Cymru oedd ei gwneud yn ofynnol ar wyneb y ddeddfwriaeth mai awdurdodau cyhoeddus fyddai'r awdurdodau gorfodi. Ni chafodd yr argymhelliad hwnnw ei dderbyn, ac, yn ein gwaith craffu ni, nodwyd gennym fod y Bil newydd yn parhau i ddefnyddio'r un dull o weithredu. Fodd bynnag, rydym yn falch iawn, o ganlyniad i waith pellach gan y Llywodraeth, fod y Gweinidog wedi dweud wrthym ei fod yn fwriad ganddi gyflwyno gwelliant yng Nghyfnod 2 i fodloni argymhelliad y pwyllgor a'n rhagflaenodd. Rydym yn croesawu penderfyniad y Gweinidog yn fawr iawn ac yn ystyried y bydd hyn yn cryfhau'r Bil drwy roi mwy o eglurder. Rwyf am droi yn awr at yr argymhelliad yn ein hadroddiad cyfredol sy'n ymwneud â'r awdurdodau gorfodi hynny. Roeddem yn argymell y dylai'r Gweinidog gyflwyno gwelliant i'r Bil i sicrhau bod awdurdodau gorfodi yn gwbl ymwybodol o'u rhwymedigaethau hawliau dynol pan fyddant, er enghraifft, yn mynd i mewn i gartrefi pobl. Yn benodol, fe wnaethon ni awgrymu y gellid cyflawni hyn drwy gyhoeddi canllawiau. Credwn y byddai hyn yn tynnu sylw at bwysigrwydd hawliau dynol wrth gyflawni'n benodol y dyletswyddau gorfodi mewn ffordd fwy effeithiol nag y gellid eu cyflawni trwy ymgyrch gyfathrebu syml. Felly, tybed a allai'r Gweinidog egluro ymhellach ei bwriadau o ran yr argymhelliad hwn. Ond, rydym yn croesawu sylwadau'r Gweinidog heddiw a hefyd ei hymgysylltiad gweithredol - ei hymgysylltiad cadarnhaol - â gwaith y pwyllgor. Mae hi wedi cymryd rhan bositif iawn ac mae hi wedi ymateb yn bositif i graffu'r pwyllgor hwn a gwaith y pwyllgor a'n rhagflaenodd, a diolchwn iddi am hyn - mae hyn i gyd yn dda i ansawdd y craffu o fewn y sefydliad hwn.