English: I have to say that, after the first dog's breakfast of an RIA, where we saw figures that were wholly inaccurate in parts of that paper, I am surprised that the Welsh Government has been able to get this thing into such decent shape. It does appear that there has been better discussion, shall we say, with stakeholders, and that we now have a set of accurate figures that are very robust and, certainly, those little 20 quid here and there have now been ironed out. I do think it's worth saying, however, that there are still some concerns that have been raised by some stakeholders about the potential costs of dispute resolution, notwithstanding the fact that we have a new RIA. But, of course, they base their concerns on the evidence that they've had made available to them by SNAP Cymru. I think it's worth all of us reflecting on the fact that it doesn't necessarily have to be SNAP Cymru providing dispute resolution services in the future. There may be new and innovative ways of doing that that actually cost less for the taxpayer in the future. So, we have to be aware of that - that there are other potential dispute resolution services that could be engaged and commissioned by local authorities and others. For example, there's a fantastic organisation in my own constituency, called Createasmile, that provides advocacy services completely free of charge to people where they're contesting issues related to autism with local authorities, and there's no charge whatsoever to the public purse for that. So, it's really important that we get this right. I think we now have a financial resolution that we can support on the basis that we've got some more robust figures, but it is disappointing it's taken such a long time to get to this stage.
Welsh: Mae'n rhaid imi ddweud, ar ôl cawl potsh yr Asesiad Effaith Rheoleiddiol cyntaf, lle'r oeddem ni'n gweld ffigyrau a oedd yn gwbl anghywir mewn rhannau o'r papur hwnnw, mae'n syndod i mi fod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gallu cael siâp mor dda ar y peth. Ymddengys bod trafodaeth well wedi bod, ddywedwn ni, gyda rhanddeiliaid, a bod gennym ni nawr set o ffigurau cywir a chadarn iawn, ac yn sicr, mae'r papurau bach ugain punt yma a thraw wedi cael eu didol. Rwy'n credu ei bod yn werth dweud, serch hynny, fod yna rai pryderon a godwyd gan rai rhanddeiliaid yn parhau o ran costau posibl datrys anghydfodau, er gwaethaf y ffaith fod gennym Asesiad Effaith Rheoleiddiol newydd. Ond, wrth gwrs, maen nhw'n seilio eu pryderon ar y dystiolaeth sydd wedi ei rhoi iddyn nhw gan SNAP Cymru. Rwy'n credu ei bod yn werth i ni gyd ystyried nad yw'n angenrheidiol mai SNAP Cymru fydd yn cynnig gwasanaethau datrys anghydfod yn y dyfodol. Efallai y bydd ffyrdd newydd ac arloesol o wneud hynny yn costio llai mewn gwirionedd i'r trethdalwr yn y dyfodol. Felly, mae'n rhaid inni fod yn ymwybodol o hynny - fod yna wasanaethau posibl i ddatrys anghydfodau y gellid eu cynnwys a'u comisiynu gan awdurdodau lleol a chan eraill. Er enghraifft, mae sefydliad gwych yn fy etholaeth i fy hun, o'r enw Createasmile, sy'n cynnig gwasanaethau eirioli yn rhad ac am ddim i bobl lle maen nhw'n trafod materion sy'n ymwneud ag awtistiaeth gydag awdurdodau lleol, ac nid oes unrhyw dâl o gwbl o bwrs y wlad am hynny. Felly, mae'n wirioneddol bwysig ein bod yn gwneud hyn yn iawn. Rwy'n credu bod gennym benderfyniad ariannol erbyn hyn y gallwn ni ei gefnogi ar y sail fod gennym ffigurau cadarnach, ond mae'n achos siom ei bod wedi cymryd cymaint o amser i gyrraedd y cam hwn.