English: Thank you for those questions. I think there is a challenge about the service model the health board propose and that they will actively consider with stakeholders. Because one of the possible options that they set out is about reduced consultant cover, but having minor injuries provision instead. And there's a challenge about the public understanding the range of minor injuries services that are available - in my recent visit to Neath Port Talbot Hospital with David Rees, seeing an excellent nurse-led service, led by a consultant nurse, and a wide range of activity that, not that long ago, you would have expected to have been provided in a doctor-led emergency department. So, there's a challenge about public understanding, but equally about how the health service helps people to get to the right place. And if you're in the back of an ambulance, you don't need to worry about where you're being taken, because it's the job of the service to take you to the right place for the care that you require. And it's then about how we help the public to make their own choices, if they're going to get to a hospital site themselves. But the driver for this is the change in staff and what that means for the service. And I come back again - in the medical director's paper, he points out that it is becoming increasingly unsustainable, and safe services cannot be sustained beyond the immediate short term without unacceptable risks to patient safety. And I just don't think that any politician, in any party - in or outside the Government - can ignore the direct warning that's being provided by the medical director who's got oversight of the medical provision through the health board. So, the challenge is how they take into account the points that you make now about the different questions, about the services that are provided, where they're provided and how they're provided, and, if there is to be a change on the Royal Glamorgan site, then what that means not just for the two hospitals within the same health board in Bridgend and Merthyr, but also what that means potentially in the flow down to Cardiff as well. So, there's a challenge that is a reasonable one that is not just about the health board, and I expect them to set that out openly and transparently. And I think the engagement with staff, as well as the public, will be really important within that, because staff will have very clear views about the safety and sustainability of their service, and that often drives helpfully the way that service change should and shouldn't take place. It's not about money, it's not about political will to maintain the current services - it's actually what is the right service to be provided and how do you provide the sort of care that I want for my family and all of us want for ours and our constituents.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiynau hynny. Rwy'n credu bod her ynghlwm wrth y model gwasanaeth y mae'r bwrdd iechyd yn ei argymell ac y byddant yn mynd ati i'w ystyried gyda rhanddeiliaid. Oherwydd mae un o'r opsiynau posibl y maent yn ei nodi yn ymwneud â llai o wasanaeth gan feddygon ymgynghorol, ond cael darpariaeth mân anafiadau yn lle hynny. Ac mae'n her sy'n ymwneud â sicrhau bod y cyhoedd yn deall yr ystod o wasanaethau mân anafiadau sydd ar gael - yn fy ymweliad diweddar ag Ysbyty Castell-nedd Port Talbot gyda David Rees, gwelais wasanaeth rhagorol dan arweiniad nyrs, dan arweiniad nyrs ymgynghorol, ac ystod eang o weithgaredd y byddech, heb fod yn hir iawn yn ôl, wedi disgwyl iddo gael ei ddarparu mewn uned achosion brys dan arweiniad meddyg. Felly mae yna her yn codi mewn perthynas â dealltwriaeth y cyhoedd, ond yn yr un modd ynglŷn â sut y mae'r gwasanaeth iechyd yn helpu pobl i gyrraedd y lle iawn. Ac os ydych chi yng nghefn ambiwlans, nid oes angen i chi boeni i ble rydych chi'n cael eich cludo am mai gwaith y gwasanaeth yw mynd â chi i'r lle iawn i gael y gofal sydd ei angen arnoch. Ac mae'n ymwneud wedyn â sut rydym yn helpu'r cyhoedd i wneud eu dewisiadau eu hunain, os ydynt yn mynd i gyrraedd safle ysbyty eu hunain. Ond yr ysgogiad ar gyfer hyn yw'r newid yn y staff, a beth y mae hynny'n ei olygu i'r gwasanaeth. Ac rwy'n dychwelyd eto - ym mhapur y cyfarwyddwr meddygol, mae'n tynnu sylw at y ffaith ei bod yn fwyfwy anghynaladwy, ac na ellir cynnal gwasanaethau diogel y tu hwnt i'r tymor byr uniongyrchol heb risgiau annerbyniol i ddiogelwch cleifion. Ac nid wyf yn credu y gall unrhyw wleidydd, mewn unrhyw blaid - yn y Llywodraeth neu'r tu allan iddi - anwybyddu'r rhybudd uniongyrchol a roddir gan y cyfarwyddwr meddygol sydd â goruchwyliaeth dros y ddarpariaeth feddygol trwy'r bwrdd iechyd. Felly, yr her yw sut y maent yn ystyried y pwyntiau a wnewch yn awr am y gwahanol gwestiynau, am y gwasanaethau a ddarperir, ble y'u darperir a sut y'u darperir, ac os bydd newid ar safle Ysbyty Brenhinol Morgannwg, beth y mae hynny'n ei olygu nid yn unig i'r ddau ysbyty yn yr un bwrdd iechyd ym Mhen-y-bont ar Ogwr a Merthyr, ond hefyd yr hyn y mae'n ei olygu o bosibl yn y llif i lawr i Gaerdydd hefyd. Felly, mae yna her sy'n un resymol nad yw'n ymwneud â'r bwrdd iechyd yn unig, ac rwy'n disgwyl iddynt ei hegluro'n agored ac yn dryloyw. Ac rwy'n credu y bydd yr ymgysylltiad â staff, yn ogystal â'r cyhoedd, yn bwysig iawn o fewn hynny, oherwydd bydd gan staff safbwyntiau clir iawn am ddiogelwch a chynaliadwyedd eu gwasanaeth, ac mae hynny'n aml yn ddefnyddiol wrth ddylanwadu ar y ffordd y dylai, ac na ddylai newid i'r gwasanaeth ddigwydd. Nid yw'n ymwneud ag arian, nid yw'n ymwneud ag ewyllys gwleidyddol i gynnal y gwasanaethau presennol - mae'n ymwneud mewn gwirionedd â beth yw'r gwasanaeth cywir i'w ddarparu a sut rydych chi'n darparu'r math o ofal rwyf fi ei eisiau ar gyfer fy nheulu ac y mae pob un ohonom ei eisiau ar gyfer ein teuluoedd a'n hetholwyr.