English: Thank you, Llywydd. Thank you for your statement. I am a little bit concerned, actually, at the number of properties - I hadn't realised it was going to be quite so high - that were going to be outside the current scheme. Many of those properties, as you will know from our correspondence in the past, are in my constituency. Some of them are paying through the nose, frankly, for satellite broadband services, which are very, very expensive and pretty unreliable for those particular families. So, we are facing this digital disadvantage, and I'm very concerned about that. You have given this commitment to having a look at the ultrafast connectivity voucher system for businesses. I know that we've got the Access Broadband Cymru scheme as well, which also encourages the highest speed take-up. You haven't said whether you're considering looking again at how that operates and neither have you said whether you're prepared to look at allowing people who were early beneficiaries of that scheme, perhaps five or six years ago, when the criteria were just to get up to 2 Mbps, and whether those people can now reapply under the new scheme in order to take advantage of the higher speeds that might be available. Perhaps you could just comment on that. I noted also with interest your reference to the fact that some landowners have been obstructive. This is a regular excuse that I'm hearing from BT Openreach, but of course every time I ask them which landowners, they're unable to tell me. It's because, frankly, it is just an excuse in some cases from them, and there aren't actually any obstructions at all from local landowners. In fact, when I've tried to nail them down on this in my own constituency, it's been quite clear that there's been no problem at all with landowners; they just haven't bothered making sufficient effort to contact them or their land agents. Just one final point as well: you mentioned the permitted development rights that many of the utilities companies already enjoy. Of course, the planning system is entirely devolved here in Wales. There's no reason whatsoever why the Welsh Government couldn't extend permitted development rights to telecoms operators. I hope very much that you will, in order that we can overcome some of these problems. This is something that should have happened many years ago, frankly, and we shouldn't still be talking about these things today. What we need is some concerted action on this, if our constituents - people like mine in Moelfre and Llanarmon yn Ial and other places - are going to get access to these sorts of services, which frankly are basic services now, particularly for businesses, but not only businesses, for families too, in terms of their entertainment systems and the learning opportunities that the internet provides.
Welsh: Diolch i chi, Llywydd. Diolch i chi am eich datganiad. Rwyf braidd yn bryderus, mewn gwirionedd, o glywed nifer yr eiddo - doeddwn i ddim wedi sylweddoli y byddai'n nifer mor uchel - a fydd y tu allan i'r cynllun presennol. Mae llawer o'r eiddo hynny, fel y gwyddoch o'n gohebiaeth yn y gorffennol, yn fy etholaeth i. Mae rhai ohonynt yn talu drwy'u trwyn, a dweud y gwir, am wasanaethau band eang lloeren, sydd yn ddrud iawn, iawn ac yn eithaf annibynadwy ar gyfer y teuluoedd penodol hynny. Felly, rydym yn wynebu'r anfantais ddigidol hon, ac rwy'n bryderus iawn ynghylch hynny. Rydych wedi rhoi'r ymrwymiad hwn i gael golwg ar y system talebau gwibgyswllt i fusnesau. Gwn fod gennym gynllun Mynediad Band Eang Cymru, sydd hefyd yn annog manteisio ar y cyflymder uchaf. Nid ydych wedi dweud pa un a ydych yn ystyried edrych eto ar sut y mae hynny'n gweithredu ac nid ydych chi wedi dweud a ydych yn barod i edrych ar ganiatáu i bobl a oedd ymysg y cyntaf i elwa ar y cynllun hwnnw, efallai bump neu chwe blynedd yn ôl, pan oedd y meini prawf ond yn caniatáu ar gyfer cael hyd at 2 Mbps, ac a all y bobl hynny ailymgeisio yn awr o dan y cynllun newydd er mwyn manteisio ar y cyflymder uwch allai fod ar gael. Efallai y gallech wneud sylwadau ar hynny. Nodais hefyd gyda diddordeb eich cyfeiriad at y ffaith bod rhai tirfeddianwyr wedi bod yn rhwystrol. Mae hyn yn esgus rheolaidd a glywaf gan BT Openreach, ond wrth gwrs bob tro rwy'n gofyn iddynt pa dirfeddianwyr, ni allant ddweud wrthyf. Mae hyn oherwydd, a dweud y gwir, ei bod mewn rhai achosion yn ddim ond esgus, ac nid oes mewn gwirionedd unrhyw rwystrau o gwbl gan dirfeddianwyr lleol. Yn wir, pan wyf wedi gofyn iddynt fanylu ar hyn yn fy etholaeth fy hun, mae wedi bod yn eithaf amlwg na fu problem o gwbl gyda pherchnogion tir; nid ydynt wedi trafferthu gwneud digon o ymdrech i gysylltu â nhw neu eu hasiantau tir. Dim ond un pwynt olaf hefyd: soniasoch am yr hawliau datblygu a ganiateir sydd gan lawer o'r cwmnïau cyfleustodau eisoes. Wrth gwrs, mae'r system gynllunio wedi ei datganoli yn llwyr yma yng Nghymru. Does dim rheswm o gwbl pam na allai Llywodraeth Cymru ymestyn hawliau datblygu a ganiateir i weithredwyr telathrebu. Rwy'n gobeithio'n fawr y byddwch chi'n gwneud hynny, er mwyn inni oresgyn rhai o'r problemau hyn. Mae hyn yn rhywbeth a ddylai fod wedi digwydd flynyddoedd lawer yn ôl, a dweud y gwir, ac ni ddylem fod yn dal i siarad am y pethau hyn heddiw. Yr hyn yr ydym ei angen yw rhywfaint o weithredu ar y cyd ar hyn, os yw ein hetholwyr - pobl fel fy rhai i ym Moelfre a Llanarmon yn Iâl a lleoedd eraill - yn mynd i gael mynediad at y mathau hyn o wasanaethau, sydd a dweud y gwir yn wasanaethau sylfaenol yn awr, yn enwedig ar gyfer busnesau, ond nid busnesau yn unig, ar gyfer teuluoedd hefyd, o ran eu systemau adloniant a'r cyfleoedd dysgu y mae'r rhyngrwyd yn eu darparu.