English: First of all, can I thank all the Members for their contributions? I must say that there is one theme that ran throughout each of your contributions and that's the availability of the equipment in order to be able to test for type 1 diabetes. Dai Lloyd brought his considerable experience, obviously, as a GP, to the debate and spoke of the necessity to test every child who presents with some or all of the symptoms. But it is true, and we must remember this, that any GP, throughout his lifetime, may only see a handful of type 1 diabetes patients present to him, although, of course, over the coming years, that's likely to increase. So, I must say that we have to not allow this debate to die or for any of the recommendations to slowly melt away. This must be an ongoing debate and an ongoing business of education with all GPs and front-line practice nurses as well. Lynne Neagle, obviously, again, spoke about testing equipment and being there for primary care providers and also, of course, as all the contributors did, paid tribute to the Baldwin family. Again, Mike Hedges did that as well and also made the point of us making sure that the equipment and the knowledge are made available in our schools and colleges in particular. Janet Finch-Saunders was glad that the Cabinet Secretary had accepted and adopted many of our recommendations, but she said that many things are still not as good as they should be and that matters are not particularly improving at this moment. Julie Morgan, of course, who knows the family well, again spoke about their courage in bringing this matter forward and the work that they continue to do in order to raise awareness of this appalling infliction. Jayne Bryant again thanked the family for their strength and courage, and she spoke about children who already have been saved by the work, and I think the Baldwin family ought to take congratulations for the fact that what they're doing is already saving lives. I'd like, now, to just speak about what the Cabinet Secretary has said on these matters, but I'd like to ask him: are further actions to ensure symptoms are asked about in primary care ongoing at this moment in time? And, were the NICE guidelines in place when this tragedy actually happened, because you seem to have placed a great deal of emphasis on NICE guidelines? And, whether he expects training to be provided to GPs alongside the new diabetes referral pathway. What places are in progress in order to diagnose the delivery - the progress on diagnosis in the diabetes delivery plan? Llywydd, I very much hope that this debate and the petitions process as a whole have been a positive experience for Beth, Stuart, Lia and the rest of Peter's family and friends. I hope that we, as an Assembly, have been able to help to support their drive to improve awareness of the symptoms of type 1 diabetes and its diagnosis. I want to wish the family all the best in their continuing fundraising and awareness-raising efforts on this issue and to thank them for truly honouring Peter's memory in this way. Diolch yn fawr.
Welsh: Yn gyntaf oll, a gaf fi ddiolch i'r holl Aelodau am eu cyfraniadau? Rhaid imi ddweud bod un thema wedi rhedeg drwy bob un o'ch cyfraniadau sef argaeledd yr offer er mwyn gallu gwneud profion ar gyfer diabetes math 1. Daeth Dai Lloyd â'i brofiad sylweddol fel meddyg teulu, wrth gwrs, i'r ddadl a siaradodd am yr angen i roi prawf i bob plentyn sy'n dangos rhai neu bob un o'r symptomau. Ond mae'n wir, a rhaid inni gofio hyn, mai llond llaw yn unig o gleifion diabetes math 1 y bydd unrhyw feddyg teulu yn ei weld drwy gydol ei oes, er bod hynny'n debygol o gynyddu dros y blynyddoedd nesaf wrth gwrs. Felly, rhaid imi ddweud na ddylem adael i'r ddadl hon farw neu adael i unrhyw rai o'r argymhellion ddiflannu'n araf bach. Rhaid i hon fod yn ddadl barhaus ac yn fater o addysgu'r holl feddygon teulu a'r nyrsys practis rheng flaen yn barhaus hefyd. Siaradodd Lynne Neagle eto, wrth gwrs, am offer profi, a'i fod yno ar gyfer darparwyr gofal sylfaenol a hefyd, wrth gwrs, fel y gwnaeth yr holl gyfranwyr, talodd deyrnged i'r teulu Baldwin. Gwnaeth Mike Hedges hynny hefyd a gwnaeth y pwynt y dylem wneud yn siŵr fod yr offer a'r wybodaeth ar gael yn ein hysgolion a'n colegau yn arbennig. Roedd Janet Finch-Saunders yn falch fod Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet wedi derbyn ac wedi mabwysiadu llawer o'n hargymhellion, ond dywedodd fod yna lawer o bethau o hyd nad oedd cystal ag y dylent fod ac nad yw pethau'n gwella'n arbennig ar hyn o bryd. Siaradodd Julie Morgan, wrth gwrs, sy'n adnabod y teulu'n dda, am eu dewrder yn dwyn y mater hwn i'r amlwg a'r gwaith y maent yn parhau i'w wneud er mwyn codi ymwybyddiaeth o'r cyflwr ofnadwy hwn. Diolchodd Jayne Bryant i'r teulu am eu nerth a'u dewrder, a siaradodd am blant sydd eisoes wedi eu hachub gan y gwaith, ac rwy'n credu y dylid llongyfarch y teulu Baldwin am fod yr hyn y maent yn ei wneud eisoes yn achub bywydau. Hoffwn siarad yn awr am yr hyn y mae Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet wedi'i ddweud am y materion hyn, ond hoffwn ofyn iddo: a oes camau pellach ar y gweill i sicrhau y gofynnir ynglŷn â symptomau mewn gofal sylfaenol ar hyn o bryd? Ac a oedd y canllawiau NICE ar waith pan ddigwyddodd y trychineb hwn mewn gwirionedd, oherwydd mae'n ymddangos eich bod wedi rhoi llawer o bwyslais ar y canllawiau NICE? Ac a yw'n disgwyl i hyfforddiant gael ei ddarparu i feddygon teulu ochr yn ochr â'r llwybr atgyfeirio newydd ar gyfer diabetes? Pa broses sydd ar y gweill ar gyfer gwneud diagnosis o'r ddarpariaeth - y cynnydd ar ddiagnosis yn y cynllun cyflawni ar gyfer diabetes? Lywydd, rwy'n mawr obeithio bod y ddadl hon a'r broses ddeisebau yn gyffredinol wedi bod yn brofiad cadarnhaol i Beth, Stuart, Lia a gweddill teulu a chyfeillion Peter. Rwy'n gobeithio ein bod ni fel Cynulliad wedi gallu helpu i gefnogi eu hymgyrch i wella ymwybyddiaeth o symptomau diabetes math 1 a'i ddiagnosis. Hoffwn ddymuno'r gorau i'r teulu yn eu hymdrechion parhaus i godi arian ac i godi ymwybyddiaeth o'r mater a diolch iddynt am anrhydeddu'r cof am Peter yn y ffordd hon. Diolch yn fawr.