techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Diolch, Llywydd. There are two changes to today's agenda. The Minister for Education will make a statement this afternoon on an update to education provision, after which the Minister for Housing and Local Government will make a statement on homelessness. Draft business for the next three weeks is set out on the business statement and announcement, which can be found amongst the meeting papers available to Members electronically.
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Mae dau newid i'r agenda heddiw. Bydd y Gweinidog Addysg yn gwneud datganiad y prynhawn yma ar ddiweddariad i'r ddarpariaeth addysg, ac wedyn bydd y Gweinidog Tai a Llywodraeth Leol yn gwneud datganiad ar ddigartrefedd. Mae'r busnes drafft ar gyfer y tair wythnos nesaf wedi'i nodi yn y datganiad a chyhoeddiad busnes, sydd i'w gweld ymhlith papurau'r cyfarfodydd sydd ar gael i'r Aelodau yn electronig.
English: The next item, therefore, is a statement by the First Minister on the coronavirus, and I call on the First Minister to make the statement - Mark Drakeford.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf, felly, yw'r datganiad gan y Prif Weinidog ar goronafeirws. Galw ar y Prif Weinidog i wneud ei ddatganiad - Mark Drakeford.
English: Thank you very much, Llywydd. Once again, I will report to the Senedd on the latest steps that we have taken in response to the coronavirus crisis. Last week, we completed the third three-week period where we are required to review the restrictions that are in place. I will outline the decisions that came into force on Monday, 1 June. As we have done previously, we took account of the latest Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies evidence and the advice of the Chief Medical Officer for Wales and, on the basis of that evidence, we have taken cautious steps in relaxing some restrictions in order to enable people to meet each other in conditions where the risk is low. Although the figures are moving in the right direction, it is not safe yet for us to go further than that.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. Unwaith eto, byddaf yn rhoi adroddiad i'r Senedd ar y camau diweddaraf wrth inni ymateb i'r argyfwng coronafeirws. Wythnos diwethaf, daethom i ddiwedd y trydydd cyfnod o dair wythnos pryd mae'n rhaid inni adolygu'r cyfyngiadau sydd mewn lle. Byddaf yn amlinellu'r penderfyniadau a ddaeth i rym ar ddydd Llun, 1 Mehefin. Fel o'r blaen, fe wnaethom ystyried y dystiolaeth ddiweddaraf gan SAGE a chyngor Prif Swyddog Meddygol Cymru. Ar sail y dystiolaeth honno, rydym wedi cymryd camau gofalus tuag at lacio'r cyfnod clo er mwyn galluogi pobl i gwrdd â'i gilydd mewn amodau lle mae'r risg yn isel. Er bod y ffigurau yn mynd i'r cyfeiriad cywir, dydy hi ddim yn saff eto inni fynd ymhellach na hynny.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. First Minister, last Friday, as you've just mentioned, you took the decision to start easing the lockdown restrictions in Wales, and introduced the rule to allow people to visit their loved ones within a 5-mile radius while socially distancing. That rule may have been some comfort to those living in some areas, but this has also been met by many with anger and frustration in other areas, many of whom felt that the Welsh Government simply doesn't care about those who live in the more remote parts of the country. You said yourself that unfairness was inevitable. First Minister, given that you're keen to tell us that your policies are based on the latest scientific and medical advice available, where is the scientific and medical advice that you have received regarding this particular policy, and will you now put that scientific and medical advice in the public domain so that the people of Wales can understand how the Welsh Government has arrived at this specific decision?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, ddydd Gwener diwethaf, fel yr ydych chi newydd sôn, gwnaed y penderfyniad gennych chi i ddechrau llacio'r cyfyngiadau symud yng Nghymru, gan gyflwyno'r rheol i ganiatáu i bobl ymweld â'u hanwyliaid o fewn radiws o 5 milltir gan gadw pellter cymdeithasol. Efallai fod y rheol honno wedi bod yn rhywfaint o gysur i'r rhai sy'n byw mewn rhai ardaloedd, ond mae llawer mewn ardaloedd eraill hefyd wedi ymateb gyda dicter a rhwystredigaeth i hyn, a llawer ohonyn nhw'n teimlo nad yw Llywodraeth Cymru yn poeni o gwbl am y rhai sy'n byw yn y rhannau mwy anghysbell o'r wlad. Dywedasoch eich hun bod annhegwch yn anochel. Prif Weinidog, gan eich bod chi'n awyddus i ddweud wrthym ni bod eich polisïau yn seiliedig ar y cyngor gwyddonol a meddygol diweddaraf sydd ar gael, ble mae'r cyngor gwyddonol a meddygol yr ydych chi wedi ei gael ynglŷn â'r polisi penodol hwn, ac a wnewch chi gyhoeddi'r cyngor gwyddonol a meddygol hwnnw nawr fel y gall pobl Cymru ddeall sut y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gwneud y penderfyniad penodol hwn?
English: Clearly, First Minister, this is very confusing for people, because you've just said that now this is a rule of thumb, so people will now not know whether they can travel 5, 10, 15 miles. It's a fact that this policy has upset thousands of people across Wales who are watching others reunite with loved ones whilst they have no option but to remain at home. Now, First Minister, yesterday the health Minister warned some lockdown measures may have to be reintroduced in the winter depending on the prevalence of COVID-19 at that time, and whilst I appreciate that no door can be closed on future restrictions, the comments have made for very grim reading for many people across Wales. Of course, strategic planning must be considered to ensure that Wales is prepared for future lockdown restrictions in the winter months, and allocations must be set aside should Wales be in the position where the Welsh Government needs to reintroduce further lockdown measures. Therefore, can you confirm what financial modelling is currently taking place to ensure that Wales has learnt from this pandemic? Could you also tell us what allocations of funding the Welsh Government is setting aside in the event that there need to be further restrictions in the winter? And what lessons have already been learnt about Wales's response to a pandemic from this period that will inform the direction of travel for any future pandemic spikes?
Welsh: Yn amlwg, Prif Weinidog, mae hyn yn ddryslyd iawn i bobl, gan eich bod chi newydd ddweud mai canllaw bras yw hwn nawr, felly ni fydd pobl yn gwybod bellach a ydyn nhw'n cael teithio 5, 10, 15 milltir. Mae'n ffaith fod y polisi hwn wedi peri gofid i filoedd o bobl ledled Cymru sy'n gwylio eraill yn aduno â'u hanwyliaid ond nad oes ganddyn nhw unrhyw ddewis heblaw aros gartref. Nawr, Prif Weinidog, rhybuddiodd y Gweinidog iechyd ddoe y gallai fod yn rhaid ailgyflwyno rhai mesurau cyfyngiadau symud yn y gaeaf yn dibynnu ar gyffredinolrwydd COVID-19 bryd hynny, ac er fy mod i'n sylweddoli na ellir cau unrhyw ddrws ar gyfyngiadau yn y dyfodol, mae'r sylwadau wedi bod yn frawychus iawn i lawer o bobl ledled Cymru. Wrth gwrs, mae'n rhaid ystyried cynllunio strategol i sicrhau bod Cymru yn barod ar gyfer cyfyngiadau symud yn y dyfodol ym misoedd y gaeaf, ac mae'n rhaid rhoi dyraniadau o'r neilltu pe byddai Cymru yn y sefyllfa lle mae angen i Lywodraeth Cymru ailgyflwyno rhagor o gyfyngiadau symud. Felly, a allwch chi gadarnhau pa fodelu ariannol sy'n digwydd ar hyn o bryd i sicrhau bod Cymru wedi dysgu o'r pandemig hwn? A allech chi hefyd ddweud wrthym ni pa ddyraniadau cyllid y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn eu neilltuo os bydd angen mwy o gyfyngiadau yn y gaeaf? A pha wersi sydd eisoes wedi'u dysgu am ymateb Cymru i bandemig o'r cyfnod hwn a fydd yn llywio'r cyfeiriad teithio ar gyfer unrhyw gynnydd i achosion o'r pandemig yn y dyfodol?
English: First Minister, the criminal murder of George Floyd at the hands of police officers in the United States has re-ignited the debate around racism on both sides of the Atlantic. Do you agree that structural racism lies at the heart of this injustice, and if we truly believe that black lives matter that we have to acknowledge that and address it? And is that structural racism, in your view, one of the reasons we are seeing a much higher incidence of death from black, Asian and minority ethnic communities as a result of COVID-19?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, mae llofruddiaeth droseddol George Floyd drwy law swyddogion yr heddlu yn yr Unol Daleithiau wedi ail-gynnau'r ddadl ynghylch hiliaeth ar y naill ochr a'r llall i Fôr yr Iwerydd. A ydych chi'n cytuno bod hiliaeth strwythurol wrth wraidd yr anghyfiawnder hwn, ac os ydym ni wir yn credu bod bywydau pobl dduon yn bwysig bod yn rhaid i ni gydnabod hynny a mynd i'r afael ag ef? Ac a yw'r hiliaeth strwythurol honno, yn eich barn chi, yn un o'r rhesymau pam yr ydym ni'n gweld nifer llawer uwch o farwolaethau mewn cymunedau pobl dduon, Asiaidd a lleiafrifoedd ethnig o ganlyniad i COVID-19?
English: The Royal College of Nursing in Wales has said that the COVID work assessment tool introduced by NHS Wales, though welcomed, does not currently identify those workers from BAME backgrounds as being at a very high risk. Why is that, and will you work with them to get this right urgently? And will you also make sure that BAME voices are well represented in the work on building back better? In June of last year, the BBC reported that, of 170 recent appointments to public bodies by Welsh Ministers, fewer than six were from BAME backgrounds. Can you say how the situation has improved since then? And given that, according to the Wales Governance Centre, we in Wales have an incarceration rate that is more racially disproportionate than England, which itself is more racially disproportionate even than the United States, will you commit to a wide-ranging inquiry into the roots and remedies of structural racism and racial disadvantage here in Wales?
Welsh: Mae Coleg Nyrsio Brenhinol Cymru wedi dweud nad yw'r offeryn asesu gwaith COVID a gyflwynwyd gan GIG Cymru, er ei fod yn cael ei groesawu, yn nodi ar hyn o bryd bod y gweithwyr hynny o gefndiroedd pobl dduon ac Asiaidd a lleiafrifoedd ethnig mewn perygl uchel iawn. Pam mae hynny'n wir, ac a wnewch chi weithio gyda nhw i gael hyn yn iawn ar frys? Ac a wnewch chi hefyd sicrhau bod lleisiau pobl dduon ac Asiaidd a lleiafrifoedd ethnig yn cael eu cynrychioli'n dda yn y gwaith ar adeiladu'n ôl yn well? Ym mis Mehefin y llynedd, adroddodd y BBC, o 170 o benodiadau diweddar i gyrff cyhoeddus gan Weinidogion Cymru, bod llai na chwech yn dod o gefndiroedd pobl dduon ac Asiaidd a lleiafrifoedd ethnig. A allwch chi ddweud sut y mae'r sefyllfa wedi gwella ers hynny? Ac o gofio bod gennym ni yng Nghymru, yn ôl Canolfan Llywodraethiant Cymru, gyfradd garcharu sy'n fwy anghyfartal o ran hil na Lloegr, sydd ei hun yn fwy anghyfartal o ran hil na'r Unol Daleithiau hyd yn oed, a wnewch chi ymrwymo i ymchwiliad eang i wreiddiau a chamau i unioni hiliaeth strwythurol ac anfantais hiliol yma yng Nghymru?
English: Llywydd, can I begin by agreeing with Mick Antoniw about the importance of the aviation sector here in Wales? The sector has some of the best employers in Wales - employers like Airbus, with such a strong history of working co-operatively with trade unions in the joint enterprise, which is making a success of those companies. I know that my colleague, Ken Skates has written directly to the other company that Mick Antoniw has highlighted, urging them to withdraw the measures that they have proposed at present to work collaboratively with the trade union that represents workers in there. Sensible companies know that complying simply with the letter of the law is not the best way to shape a future for those companies that brings their workforce with them - their single most important asset. Those were the terms in which the Minister for the economy has written to the company and I urge the UK Government to use whatever powers of persuasion they have as well to make sure that not just the letter of the law but the spirit and the ethic of the law, as Mick Antoniw said, is complied with here as well as.
Welsh: Llywydd, a gaf i ddechrau drwy gytuno â Mick Antoniw am bwysigrwydd y sector hedfan yma yng Nghymru? Mae gan y sector rai o'r cyflogwyr gorau yng Nghymru - cyflogwyr fel Airbus, gyda hanes mor gryf o gydweithio ag undebau llafur yn y gyd-fenter, sy'n gwneud llwyddiant o'r cwmnïau hynny. Gwn fod fy nghyd-Weinidog, Ken Skates, wedi ysgrifennu yn uniongyrchol at y cwmni arall y mae Mick Antoniw wedi tynnu sylw ato, yn eu hannog nhw i dynnu'n ôl y mesurau y maen nhw wedi'u cynnig ar hyn o bryd i gydweithio â'r undeb llafur sy'n cynrychioli gweithwyr yn y fan honno. Mae cwmnïau doeth yn gwybod nad cydymffurfio'n syml â llythyren y ddeddf yn unig yw'r ffordd orau o lunio dyfodol ar gyfer y cwmnïau hynny sy'n dod â'u gweithlu gyda nhw - eu hased pwysicaf un. Yn y termau hynny y mae Gweinidog yr economi wedi ysgrifennu at y cwmni ac rwy'n annog Llywodraeth y DU i ddefnyddio pa bynnag bwerau perswadio sydd ganddyn nhw hefyd i wneud yn siŵr nad dim ond llythyren y ddeddf ond ysbryd a moeseg y ddeddf, fel y dywedodd Mick Antoniw, y cydymffurfir â nhw yma hefyd.
English: First Minister, I was pleased to hear you confirm again that the 5 miles referred to earlier is not a rule as such, because it is not just in rural areas that that is an issue, as you know; it is also an issue in many Valleys communities, including my own, where if that was rigorously adhered to, it would mean that someone couldn't go, for instance, from Cwmbran to Blaenavon to see their family, so I think that's a very important point. I wanted to ask about social distancing, because I am concerned that, as we go through this lockdown, there is a general erosion of people's response to the social distancing regulations generally. I'm seeing it in supermarkets, I'm hearing it from constituents in relation to employers, so I'd like to ask you what more we can do to re-emphasise to the public that we are nowhere near out of the woods on this pandemic yet, and that these matters, these rules, really, really matter, and people have to keep observing them. Thank you.
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, roeddwn i'n falch o'ch clywed chi'n cadarnhau unwaith eto nad yw'r 5 milltir y cyfeiriwyd atyn nhw'n gynharach yn rheol fel y cyfryw, oherwydd nid dim ond mewn ardaloedd gwledig y mae hynny'n broblem, fel y gwyddoch; mae hefyd yn broblem mewn llawer o gymunedau yn y Cymoedd, gan gynnwys fy un i, lle, pe glynwyd at hynny'n llym, byddai'n golygu na allai rhywun fynd, er enghraifft, o Gwmbrân i Flaenafon i weld eu teulu, felly rwy'n credu bod hwnnw'n bwynt pwysig iawn. Roeddwn i eisiau gofyn am gadw pellter cymdeithasol, oherwydd rwy'n pryderu, wrth i ni fynd drwy'r cyfyngiadau symud hyn, bod erydiad cyffredinol i ymateb pobl i'r rheoliadau cadw pellter cymdeithasol yn gyffredinol. Rwy'n ei weld mewn archfarchnadoedd, rwy'n ei glywed gan etholwyr o ran cyflogwyr, felly hoffwn ofyn i chi beth arall y gallwn ni ei wneud i ail-bwysleisio i'r cyhoedd nad ydym ni'n agos o fod allan o berygl o ran y pandemig hwn eto, a bod y materion hyn, y rheolau hyn, yn wirioneddol bwysig, a bod yn rhaid i bobl barhau i'w dilyn. Diolch.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer, and thank you, First Minister, for your statement. I have been contacted by a number of dental practices in my region, who are concerned about the time frame proposed by the Chief Dental Officer for Wales to phase out in dentistry care. The proposal is to resume more face-to-face emergency care from 1 July, followed by routine check-ups in October and aerosol generating procedures, such as fillings and crowns, from January 2021. Private dentistry accounts for more than half of the dental services in Wales, and the number of practices that operate 100 per cent under the NHS is very low. Their financial viability depends either in part or entirely from payments received from patients undergoing AGPs. Other countries are allowing dentists to perform AGPs by using respiratory masks and other PPE. First Minister, will you look again at the timetable and what other countries are doing as a matter of urgency to ensure the financial viability of dentistry practices in Wales? And, secondly, you earlier mentioned BME casualties in Wales during this pandemic. I would like to know how many people, out of the 2,122 casualties you mentioned earlier, actually come from the BME community, which is, I understand, a pretty high number, and what measures you are going to take, at your Government level, to make sure that we stop it in future. Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd, a diolch i chithau, Prif Weinidog, am eich datganiad. Mae nifer o bractisau deintyddol yn fy rhanbarth i wedi cysylltu â mi, sy'n poeni am yr amserlen a gynigiwyd gan Brif Swyddog Deintyddol Cymru i ailgyflwyno gofal deintyddol. Y cynnig yw ailddechrau mwy o ofal brys wyneb yn wyneb o 1 Gorffennaf ymlaen, ac yna archwiliadau rheolaidd ym mis Hydref a gweithdrefnau sy'n cynhyrchu aerosol, fel llenwadau a choronau, o fis Ionawr 2021. Deintyddiaeth breifat yw mwy na hanner y gwasanaethau deintyddol yng Nghymru, ac mae nifer y practisau sy'n gweithredu 100 y cant o dan y GIG yn isel iawn. Mae eu hyfywedd ariannol yn dibynnu naill ai'n rhannol neu'n gyfan gwbl ar daliadau a dderbynnir gan gleifion sy'n cael gweithdrefnau sy'n cynhyrchu aerosol. Mae gwledydd eraill yn caniatáu i ddeintyddion ddilyn gweithdrefnau sy'n cynhyrchu aerosol drwy ddefnyddio masgiau anadlu a chyfarpar diogelu personol arall. Prif Weinidog, a wnewch chi edrych eto ar yr amserlen a'r hyn y mae gwledydd eraill yn ei wneud fel mater o frys i sicrhau hyfywedd ariannol practisau deintyddol yng Nghymru? Ac, yn ail, soniasoch yn gynharach am salwch ymhlith pobl dduon a lleiafrifoedd ethnig yng Nghymru yn ystod y pandemig hwn. Hoffwn wybod faint o bobl, o'r 2,122 o'r rhai sydd wedi marw o'r salwch y soniasoch amdanyn nhw'n gynharach, sy'n dod o'r gymuned pobl dduon a lleiafrifoedd ethnig mewn gwirionedd, sydd, yn ôl a ddeallaf, yn nifer eithaf uchel, a pha gamau ydych chi'n mynd i'w cymryd, ar lefel eich Llywodraeth, i sicrhau ein bod ni'n ei atal yn y dyfodol. Diolch.
English: First Minister, your Government announced on Sunday that the guidelines for people who've been told to shield were changing the following day. I'm aware that there's a lot of concern from people who were told to shield to protect their lives that these changes were brought forward with little warning and when the R rate is still high. This morning you will have received a letter from 32 health charities active in Wales, outlining their deep concerns about these changes. They want an explanation about the rationale for the sudden departure from existing guidelines. They ask that shielders are told directly about changes rather than finding out through a press statement, and they want the sector to be informed of changes in advance in the future, so that they can prepare. They request that you meet them to discuss their concerns. First Minister, will you do that?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, cyhoeddodd eich Llywodraeth ddydd Sul bod y canllawiau i bobl y dywedwyd wrthyn nhw am warchod yn newid y diwrnod canlynol. Rwy'n ymwybodol bod llawer o bryder ymhlith pobl y dywedwyd wrthyn nhw i warchod i ddiogelu eu bywydau bod y newidiadau hyn wedi eu cyflwyno heb fawr o rybudd a phan fo'r gyfradd R yn dal i fod yn uchel. Y bore yma, byddwch wedi cael llythyr gan 32 o elusennau iechyd sy'n weithredol yng Nghymru, yn amlinellu eu pryderon dwys am y newidiadau hyn. Maen nhw eisiau esboniad am y rhesymeg dros y newid sydyn o'r canllawiau presennol. Maen nhw'n gofyn i'r rhai sy'n gwarchod gael eu hysbysu'n uniongyrchol am newidiadau yn hytrach na darganfod trwy ddatganiad i'r wasg, ac maen nhw eisiau i'r sector gael ei hysbysu am newidiadau ymlaen llaw yn y dyfodol, fel ei fod yn gallu paratoi. Maen nhw'n gofyn i chi gyfarfod â nhw i drafod eu pryderon. Prif Weinidog, a wnewch chi hynny?
English: First Minister, on 1 May you announced that the Welsh Government would fund an extra payment of £500 to social care workers in care homes and domiciliary care workers throughout Wales: 'This payment is designed to provide some further recognition of the value we attach to everything' that social care workers do to 'support both our NHS and our wider society.' My questions are: when will it be paid? How will it be paid? Is it a one-off payment or will it be added to wages? Will it be treated as wages and taxed, or treated as a gift and not taxed?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, fe wnaethoch gyhoeddi ar 1 Mai y byddai Llywodraeth Cymru yn ariannu taliad ychwanegol o £500 i weithwyr gofal cymdeithasol mewn cartrefi gofal a gweithwyr gofal cartref ledled Cymru: 'Diben y taliad hwn yw rhoi cydnabyddiaeth bellach o'n gwerthfawrogiad am bopeth' y mae gweithwyr gofal cymdeithasol yn ei wneud i 'gefnogi ein GIG a'r gymdeithas ehangach.' Dyma fy nghwestiynau i: pryd y bydd yn cael ei dalu? Sut y bydd yn cael ei dalu? Ai taliad untro ydyw neu a fydd yn cael ei ychwanegu at gyflogau? A fydd yn cael ei drin fel cyflog ac yn cael ei drethu, neu'n cael ei drin fel rhodd a ddim yn cael ei drethu?
English: Well, Llywydd, there will be answers to all of those questions, but those answers were contingent upon a reply from the UK Government to our plea to them to make this payment free of tax and free of national insurance contributions. It was deeply disappointing to receive a response from the Financial Secretary to the Treasury on Monday declining to do that. That, of course, now means we will have to think through a whole series of issues to try to minimise the impact of that Treasury decision. It's not possible to answer all of Mike Hedges's questions this morning, because we had hoped that there was a different and far better solution. We wanted our £500 to go directly to the people who we have identified for the contribution they have made, because they are amongst the least well-paid people in our workforce. We weren't asking the Treasury for money, we were simply asking them not to rob those people of the money that the Welsh Government was providing to them. Now, a significant amount of the money that the Welsh Government is still going to provide to those social care workers will end up not in their pockets but in the pockets of the Treasury. We will have to reconsider a whole number of the questions that Mike Hedges has quite properly raised to try and find ways of mitigating that decision, but the real answer is that this shouldn't be subject to tax and it shouldn't be subject to national insurance, and then we wouldn't have to worry about finding ways of trying to make that impact less significant.
Welsh: Wel, Llywydd, fe fydd atebion i'r holl gwestiynau yna, ond roedd yr atebion hynny yn amodol ar ateb gan Lywodraeth y DU i'n ple iddyn nhw wneud y taliad hwn yn rhydd o dreth ac yn rhydd o gyfraniadau yswiriant gwladol. Siomedig iawn oedd cael ymateb gan yr Ysgrifennydd Ariannol i'r Trysorlys ddydd Llun yn gwrthod gwneud hynny. Mae hynny, wrth gwrs, yn golygu bellach y bydd yn rhaid i ni roi ystyriaeth i amrywiaeth eang o faterion i geisio sicrhau bod effaith y penderfyniad hwnnw gan y Trysorlys cyn lleied â phosibl. Nid yw'n bosibl ateb holl gwestiynau Mike Hedges y bore yma, gan ein bod ni wedi gobeithio y byddai ateb gwahanol a llawer gwell. Roeddem ni eisiau i'n £500 fynd yn syth i'r bobl yr ydym ni wedi eu cydnabod am y cyfraniad y maen nhw wedi ei wneud, oherwydd maen nhw ymhlith y bobl sy'n cael y cyflog lleiaf yn ein gweithlu. Nid oeddem ni'n gofyn i'r Trysorlys am arian, dim ond gofyn yr oeddem ni iddyn nhw beidio â dwyn yr arian yr oedd Llywodraeth Cymru yn ei ddarparu i'r bobl hynny oddi wrthyn nhw. Nawr, bydd swm sylweddol o'r arian y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn dal i fynd i'w ddarparu i'r gweithwyr gofal cymdeithasol hynny yn y pen draw nid yn eu pocedi nhw ond ym mhocedi'r Trysorlys. Bydd yn rhaid i ni ailystyried nifer fawr o'r cwestiynau y mae Mike Hedges wedi eu codi yn gwbl briodol i geisio dod o hyd i ffyrdd o liniaru'r penderfyniad hwnnw, ond yr ateb gwirioneddol yw na ddylai hyn fod yn destun treth ac na ddylai fod yn destun yswiriant gwladol, ac wedyn ni fyddai'n rhaid i ni boeni am ddod o hyd i ffyrdd o geisio gwneud yr effaith honno'n llai sylweddol.