techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you. During our debate recently, your Cabinet Secretary for Health, Well-being and Sport was very much in favour of abolishing community health councils and replacing them with a new body. This is despite an inordinate amount of public objection. How ironic then, First Minister, that, in my most recent correspondence with the Cabinet Secretary regarding a problematic constituent case, he has had the audacity to suggest that I recommend to my constituents approaching their CHC, in effect passing the buck for the shortcomings of his, and your, health service. First Minister, would you not agree with me that this is rather duplicitous of the Cabinet Secretary, and would you also place on record your acknowledgement and support of the work that the community health councils and their volunteers have carried out on behalf of our patients as an advocacy service over many years?
Welsh: Diolch. Yn ystod ein dadl yn ddiweddar, roedd eich Ysgrifennydd Cabinet dros Iechyd, Llesiant a Chwaraeon wir o blaid diddymu cynghorau iechyd cymuned a'u disodli gyda chorff newydd. Mae hyn er gwaethaf llawer iawn o wrthwynebiad gan y cyhoedd. Pa mor eironig felly, Prif Weinidog, yn fy ngohebiaeth ddiweddaraf â'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet ynghylch achos anodd yn ymwneud ag etholwr, bod ganddo'r hyfdra i awgrymu y dylwn i argymell i'm hetholwyr gysylltu â'u CIC, gan drosglwyddo cyfrifoldeb, i bob pwrpas, am ddiffygion ei wasanaeth iechyd ef a chithau. Prif Weinidog, oni fyddech chi'n cytuno â mi bod hyn braidd yn ddauwynebog gan yr Ysgrifennydd Cabinet, ac a fyddech chi hefyd yn rhoi ar goedd eich cydnabyddiaeth a'ch cefnogaeth i'r gwaith y mae'r cynghorau iechyd cymuned a'u gwirfoddolwyr wedi ei wneud ar ran ein cleifion fel gwasanaeth eirioli dros flynyddoedd lawer?
English: Duplicitous - that's the word of the day. I think we had that yesterday from the Secretary of State for Wales in his widely ignored speech. [Laughter.] I don't accept at all that the Cabinet Secretary has been in any way duplicitous. Of course, he would refer a constituent of yours to an independent advocacy service. That's what exists under the current structure and that's what will exist in the future - an independent service. The Minister cannot be by nature independent, so I think the answer he's given to you is absolutely correct: that if your patient needs advocacy, it is right that that advocacy service should be independent. It's right, then, that it is the community health council, as they provide that service at this moment in time, and - we look to see, of course, what the responses will be to the White Paper - your constituent, I believe, has been given the right advice, based on what you've told me in the Chamber today.
Welsh: Dauwynebog - dyna air y dydd. Rwy'n credu i ni gael hwnnw ddoe gan Ysgrifennydd Gwladol Cymru yn ei araith a anwybyddwyd yn eang. [Chwerthin.] Nid wyf yn derbyn o gwbl bod Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet wedi bod yn ddauwynebog mewn unrhyw fffordd. Wrth gwrs, byddai'n cyfeirio etholwr i chi at wasanaeth eirioli annibynnol. Dyna sy'n bodoli o dan y strwythur presennol a dyna fydd yn bodoli yn y dyfodol - gwasanaeth annibynnol. Ni all y Gweinidog fod yn annibynnol, wrth reswm, felly rwy'n credu bod yr ateb y mae wedi ei roi i chi yn gwbl gywir: sef os oes angen eiriolaeth ar eich claf, mae'n briodol y dylai'r gwasanaeth eirioli hwnnw fod yn annibynnol. Mae'n briodol, felly, mai'r cyngor iechyd cymuned ydyw, gan mai nhw sy'n darparu'r gwasanaeth hwnnw ar hyn o bryd, ac - rydym ni'n aros i weld, wrth gwrs, beth fydd yr ymatebion i'r Papur Gwyn - rhoddwyd y cyngor cywir i'ch etholwr, yn fy marn i, yn seiliedig ar yr hyn yr ydych chi wedi ei ddweud wrthyf yn y Siambr heddiw.
English: First Minister, the Welsh Government, in January 2017, announced veterans and armed forces champions of health boards and NHS trusts in Wales. The Aneurin Bevan Local Health Board, which covers my constituents in Islwyn, named Brian Mawby as the champion. Congratulations to him. What impact does the First Minister believe these champions are having on ensuring that local service plans provide support, and that their local plans reflect the needs and priorities of the brave men and women of Wales who have bravely served our nation in our armed forces?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, cyhoeddwyd hyrwyddwyr cyn-filwyr a lluoedd arfog byrddau iechyd ac ymddiriedolaethau'r GIG yng Nghymru gan Lywodraeth Cymru ym mis Ionawr 2017. Enwodd Bwrdd Iechyd Lleol Aneurin Bevan, sy'n gwasanaethu fy etholwyr yn Islwyn, Brian Mawby fel yr hyrwyddwr. Llongyfarchiadau iddo. Pa effaith y mae'r Prif Weinidog yn credu y bydd yr hyrwyddwyr hyn yn ei chael ar sicrhau bod cynlluniau gwasanaeth lleol yn darparu cymorth, a bod eu cynlluniau lleol yn adlewyrchu anghenion a blaenoriaethau'r dynion a menywod dewr yng Nghymru sydd wedi gwasanaethu ein cenedl gyda dewrder yn ein lluoedd arfog?
English: Very much so. We know, of course, that there are very effective champions in many aspects of public life in Wales, and they do much to influence positively the direction of the Government and, indeed, public bodies and agencies. So, yes, I very much recognise the work that your constituent has done, as many others have done across Wales, because they add to the knowledge the Government has in order for Government to act in the most appropriate way for the people.
Welsh: Yn sicr. Gwyddom, wrth gwrs, bod hyrwyddwyr effeithiol iawn mewn sawl agwedd ar fywyd cyhoeddus yng Nghymru, ac maen nhw'n gwneud llawer i ddylanwadu'n gadarnhaol ar gyfeiriad y Llywodraeth ac, yn wir, cyrff ac asiantaethau cyhoeddus. Felly, ydw, rwy'n sicr yn cydnabod y gwaith y mae eich etholwr wedi ei wneud, fel y mae llawer o bobl eraill wedi ei wneud ledled Cymru, gan eu bod yn ychwanegu at yr wybodaeth sydd gan y Llywodraeth fel y gall y Llywodraeth weithredu yn y ffordd fwyaf priodol i'r bobl.
English: First Minister, an independent patient voice is vital, particularly for those who can't make themselves heard. We have made huge progress in providing advocates for people with mental health issues, but patient advocacy services are also vital to people with dementia. There have been calls for every person with dementia to have access to a skilled and independent advocate who understands dementia and is equipped to advocate effectively. First Minister, do you support this view and will you outline the actions your Government is taking to improve advocacy services for people with dementia?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, mae llais cleifion annibynnol yn hanfodol, yn enwedig i'r rheini na allant gael gwrandawiad. Rydym ni wedi gwneud cynnydd enfawr o ran darparu eiriolwyr i bobl â phroblemau iechyd meddwl, ond mae gwasanaethau eiriolaeth cleifion hefyd yn hanfodol i bobl â dementia. Bu galwadau i bawb â dementia gael mynediad at eiriolwr medrus ac annibynnol sy'n deall dementia ac sy'n gallu eirioli'n effeithiol. Prif Weinidog, a ydych chi'n cefnogi'r safbwynt hwn ac a wnewch chi amlinellu'r camau y mae eich Llywodraeth yn eu cymryd i wella gwasanaethau eirioli i bobl â dementia?
English: Well, health boards are responsible for arranging the provision of general patient advocacy services for children, and children and young people in receipt of mental health care can be further supported to raise concerns through accessing independent mental health advocacy. All health boards in Wales have in place arrangements to provide mental health advocates trained in working with children and young people - that's true. And, of course, we want to make sure that the patient voice is strengthened when it comes to mental health services for adults. We've done much, of course, to assist those organisations who are helping people and their families who are dealing with dementia, such as, for example, by pushing forward with dementia-friendly places so that people can go and live their lives as long as possible and in as familiar an environment as possible.
Welsh: Wel, byrddau iechyd sy'n gyfrifol am drefnu'r ddarpariaeth o wasanaethau eiriolaeth cleifion cyffredinol ar gyfer plant, a gellir cefnogi plant a phobl ifanc sy'n derbyn gofal iechyd meddwl ymhellach i godi pryderon trwy fanteisio ar eiriolaeth iechyd meddwl annibynnol. Mae gan bob bwrdd iechyd yng Nghymru drefniadau ar waith i ddarparu eiriolwyr iechyd meddwl sydd wedi'u hyfforddi i weithio gyda phlant a phobl ifanc - mae hynny'n wir. Ac wrth gwrs, rydym ni eisiau sicrhau bod llais y claf yn cael ei gryfhau pan ddaw i wasanaethau iechyd meddwl i oedolion. Rydym ni wedi gwneud llawer, wrth gwrs, i gynorthwyo'r sefydliadau hynny sy'n helpu pobl a'u teuluoedd sy'n ymdrin â dementia fel, er enghraifft, trwy fwrw ymlaen â lleoedd ystyriol o ddementia fel y gall pobl fynd a byw eu bywydau cyhyd â phosibl ac mewn amgylchedd mor gyfarwydd â phosibl.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. First Minister, homelessness is a blight on any civilised society. Have you noticed that the number of rough sleepers is currently increasing?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, mae digartrefedd yn aflwydd ar unrhyw gymdeithas wâr. A ydych chi wedi sylwi bod nifer y bobl sy'n cysgu ar y stryd yn cynyddu ar hyn o bryd?
English: The number of rough sleepers, according to the last count, is 141. That count took place in November of 2016. It's difficult, of course, to count the number on a regular basis because it does fluctuate up and down, but she is right to identify the fact that rough sleeping is an issue, which is why - the Secretary will be giving his statement on the budget later - we will be looking to provide all the resource that we can in order to alleviate the problem.
Welsh: Yn ôl y cyfrif diwethaf, 141 yw nifer y bobl sy'n cysgu ar y stryd. Cynhaliwyd y cyfrif hwnnw ym mis Tachwedd 2016. Mae'n anodd, wrth gwrs, cyfrif y nifer yn rheolaidd gan ei fod yn amrywio i fyny ac i lawr, ond mae hi'n iawn i nodi'r ffaith fod cysgu ar y stryd yn broblem, a dyna pam - bydd yr Ysgrifennydd yn gwneud ei ddatganiad ar y gyllideb yn ddiweddarach - byddwn yn ceisio darparu'r holl adnoddau y gallwn er mwyn lliniaru'r broblem.
English: Homelessness is on the increase, First Minister, and that's from rough sleeping counts, applications for homelessness support, people in temporary accommodation, evictions - the lot. Here in Cardiff, The Wallich estimates that there's been an 18 per cent increase in rough sleeping compared to the same quarter in 2016. It comes as no surprise, to us at least, that this is happening. Everyone predicted that this would happen as a result of welfare cuts, which, I remind you, started under the Blair Government when Lord Freud was given his first ministerial job. But it was also predictable that Westminster's dysfunctional political system would ignore these warnings and go ahead with their cuts anyway. Why wasn't your Government and your party more proactive in seeking the powers to not have to implement these cuts?
Welsh: Mae digartrefedd ar gynnydd, Prif Weinidog, ac mae hynny o gyfrifau pobl sy'n cysgu ar y stryd, ceisiadau am gymorth digartrefedd, pobl mewn llety dros dro, achosion o droi pobl allan - y cwbl. Yma yng Nghaerdydd, mae'r Wallich yn amcangyfrif y bu cynnydd o 18 y cant i'r nifer sy'n cysgu ar y stryd o'i gymharu â'r un chwarter yn 2016. Nid yw'n unrhyw syndod, i ni o leiaf, bod hyn yn digwydd. Rhagwelodd pawb y byddai hyn yn digwydd o ganlyniad i doriadau lles, a ddechreuodd, i'ch atgoffa, o dan Lywodraeth Blair pan benodwyd Arglwydd Freud i'w swydd weinidogol gyntaf. Ond roedd hefyd yn hawdd rhagweld y byddai system wleidyddol ddiffygiol San Steffan yn anwybyddu'r rhybuddion hyn ac yn bwrw ymlaen â'u toriadau beth bynnag. Pam nad oedd eich Llywodraeth a'ch plaid chi yn fwy rhagweithiol wrth geisio'r pwerau i beidio â gorfod gweithredu'r toriadau hyn?
English: Well, it's one thing to have the powers, it's another thing to have the money. It's one thing to say, 'We're going to do something'; if the money isn't there to do it, then it becomes more difficult. What have we done? Well, we've just announced an additional £2.6 million to support services for rough sleepers and young people, and crucially we've introduced legislation to prevent homelessness in the first place. Dealing with people who are already on the street is important, but surely it must be the case as well that prevention is a priority for us. The legislation has meant more help for more people and help at an earlier stage, including rough sleepers, and the latest homelessness statistics for the first quarter of this financial year show a steady rate of success in times of increasing demand - 63 per cent of all households threatened with homelessness had their homelessness prevented in Wales. That would not have happened anywhere else, and that's as a result of the legislation.
Welsh: Wel, mae'n un peth meddu ar y pwerau, peth arall yw meddu ar yr arian. Un peth yw dweud, 'Rydym ni'n mynd i wneud rhywbeth'; os nad yw'r arian yno i'w wneud, yna mae'n dod yn fwy anodd. Beth ydym ni wedi ei wneud? Wel, rydym ni newydd gyhoeddi £2.6 miliwn ychwanegol i gynorthwyo gwasanaethau i bobl sy'n cysgu ar y stryd a phobl ifanc, ac yn hollbwysig rydym ni wedi cyflwyno deddfwriaeth i atal digartrefedd yn y lle cyntaf. Mae ymdrin â phobl sydd eisoes ar y stryd yn bwysig, ond does bosib nad yw'n wir hefyd bod ataliaeth yn flaenoriaeth i ni. Mae'r ddeddfwriaeth wedi golygu mwy o gymorth i fwy o bobl a chymorth yn gynharach, gan gynnwys pobl sy'n cysgu ar y stryd, ac mae'r ystadegau digartrefedd diweddaraf ar gyfer chwarter cyntaf y flwyddyn ariannol hon yn dangos cyfradd sefydlog o lwyddiant ar adeg o alw cynyddol - ataliwyd digartrefedd 63 y cant o'r holl aelwydydd yng Nghymru a oedd dan fygythiad o ddigartrefedd. Ni fyddai hynny wedi digwydd mewn unrhyw le arall, ac mae hynny o ganlyniad i'r ddeddfwriaeth.
English: First Minister, you can't condemn Westminster for callousness while still accepting that the powers to prevent homelessness remain in Westminster. You're right - you have recently reformed the homelessness system to adopt a more preventative approach, but clearly there remain a great number of people who have fallen through the very wide holes in your safety net. Now, if you accept that we are facing a homelessness crisis - and I'd be very surprised to hear you deny that we are facing a crisis - will you commit to abolishing the Pereira test to get rid of homelessness intentionality, ending priority need, so that everyone is entitled to a home?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, ni allwch chi gondemnio San Steffan am ddiffyg tosturi gan barhau i dderbyn bod y pwerau i atal digartrefedd yn dal i fod yn San Steffan. Rydych chi'n iawn - rydych chi wedi diwygio'r system ddigartrefedd yn ddiweddar i fabwysiadu dull mwy ataliol, ond yn amlwg ceir nifer fawr o bobl sydd wedi syrthio drwy'r tyllau llydan iawn yn eich rhwyd ddiogelwch. Nawr, os ydych chi'n derbyn ein bod ni'n wynebu argyfwng digartrefedd - a byddwn i'n synnu o'ch clywed yn gwadu ein bod ni'n wynebu argyfwng - a wnewch chi ymrwymo i ddiddymu prawf Pereira i gael gwared ar fwriaded digartrefedd, gan roi terfyn ar angen blaenoriaeth, fel bod gan bawb hawl i gartref?
English: The legislation has gone some way to addressing that. She and I are in a different position. I don't believe that it makes sense to devolve welfare because we know that Wales is a net recipient of the overall pot. I do agree with her that the actions of the Tory Government have been heartless, unthinking, and have led to more people being homeless. I was in Brighton last week and it was extremely noticeable how bad the problem was in Brighton. We have a problem in Wales, we know that. It was far worse there. I believe part of that is because, in England, they have not enacted legislation that would help to prevent homelessness in the first place. The answer to this, of course, is to have a welfare system that works for people, a welfare system that is compassionate, and a welfare system administered by a Labour Government in London.
Welsh: Mae'r ddeddfwriaeth wedi gwneud cryn dipyn i fynd i'r afael â hynny. Mae ganddi hi a minnau wahanol safbwyntiau. Nid wyf yn credu ei bod hi'n gwneud synnwyr datganoli lles gan ein bod ni'n gwybod bod Cymru'n dderbynnydd net o'r pot cyffredinol. Rwy'n cytuno â hi bod gweithredoedd y Llywodraeth Dorïaidd wedi bod yn ddidostur, ac wedi arwain at fwy o bobl i fod yn ddigartref. Roeddwn i yn Brighton yr wythnos diwethaf ac roedd hi'n hynod amlwg pa mor wael oedd y broblem yn Brighton. Mae gennym ni broblem yng Nghymru, rydym ni'n gwybod hynny. Roedd yn llawer gwaeth yno. Rwy'n credu bod rhan o hynny oherwydd, yn Lloegr, nad ydynt wedi deddfu deddfwriaeth a fyddai'n helpu i atal digartrefedd yn y lle cyntaf. Yr ateb i hyn, wrth gwrs, yw cael system les sy'n gweithio i bobl, system les sy'n drugarog, a system les a weinyddir gan Lywodraeth Lafur yn Llundain.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. First Minister, recently the Cabinet Secretary for Education delivered a speech that highlighted that there were secondary schools in Wales that until recently had not been entering a single pupil for a GCSE science exam - not a single pupil in secondary schools in Wales. Also, there had been a tendency for many schools to enter pupils for the easier BTEC courses, where, in 2016, there was a 99 per cent pass rate. Estyn, in a recent report, have highlighted the difficulties that some science subjects face in the way they're taught within Welsh schools. Don't you think it is vital, if we are going to be aspirational about delivering a high-wage economy, a skilled economy, that we have more pupils entered in the sciences? And, what confidence can you give that, in the PISA examinations in 2018, we will see real improvement in the sciences? We've gone back by 20, from 505 to 485, from 2006 to 2016. It has to be a key area of improvement. Yet, on your watch, we've got schools that haven't been entering pupils for science at all.
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, gwnaeth Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros Addysg araith yn ddiweddar a dynnodd sylw at y ffaith bod ysgolion uwchradd yng Nghymru nad oeddent wedi bod yn cyflwyno yr un disgybl ar gyfer arholiad gwyddoniaeth TGAU tan yn ddiweddar - dim un disgybl mewn ysgolion uwchradd yng Nghymru. Hefyd, bu tuedd i lawer o ysgolion gyflwyno disgyblion ar gyfer y cyrsiau BTEC haws, pan, yn 2016, roedd cyfradd basio o 99 y cant. Mae Estyn, mewn adroddiad diweddar, wedi amlygu'r anawsterau y mae rhai pynciau gwyddoniaeth yn eu hwynebu yn y ffordd y maent yn cael eu haddysgu mewn ysgolion yng Nghymru. Onid ydych chi'n meddwl ei bod hi'n hanfodol, os ydym ni'n mynd i fod yn uchelgeisiol ynghylch darparu economi cyflog uchel, economi fedrus, bod gennym ni fwy o ddisgyblion yn sefyll arholiadau gwyddoniaeth? A pha hyder allwch chi ei roi, yn yr arholiadau PISA yn 2018, y byddwn ni'n gweld gwelliant gwirioneddol yn y pynciau gwyddoniaeth? Rydym ni wedi mynd yn ôl 20 safle, o 505 i 485, rhwng 2006 a 2016. Mae'n rhaid iddo fod yn faes gwella allweddol. Ac eto, o dan eich arweinyddiaeth chi, mae gennym ni ysgolion nad ydynt wedi bod yn cyflwyno disgyblion ar gyfer arholiadau gwyddoniaeth o gwbl.
English: First of all, we have for some time in Wales been emphasising the need to create parity of esteem between the academic and the vocational. Therefore, we should not make negative comparisons between BTECs and GCSEs. One is a vocational qualification; the other is more of an academic qualification. Schools will enter candidates for the appropriate exam according to what they feel they need, in terms of their future skills. He asks about PISA. Well, we've seen GCSE results improve year after year - that is a good sign as far as PISA is concerned. We've seen improvements in subjects at A-level - that's a good indication that PISA will improve in the future. We have, of course, new exams - we've made sure that they have been rolled out without great difficulty. We've taken the decision to postpone the introduction of the curriculum - that's the right decision, and we know that teachers and professionals have supported that. And, of course, we are building schools all around Wales - schools that would not be built if he were in my position.
Welsh: Yn gyntaf oll, rydym ni wedi bod yn pwysleisio ers cryn amser yng Nghymru yr angen i greu cydraddoldeb parch rhwng yr academaidd a'r galwedigaethol. Felly, ni ddylem wneud cymariaethau negyddol rhwng cymwysterau BTEC a TGAU. Mae un yn gymhwyster galwedigaethol; mae'r llall yn fwy o gymhwyster academaidd. Bydd ysgolion yn cyflwyno ymgeiswyr ar gyfer yr arholiad priodol yn unol â'r hyn y maen nhw'n teimlo sydd ei angen arnynt, o ran eu sgiliau yn y dyfodol. Mae'n gofyn am PISA. Wel, rydym ni wedi gweld canlyniadau TGAU yn gwella flwyddyn ar ôl blwyddyn - mae hynny'n arwydd da o ran PISA. Rydym ni wedi gweld gwelliannau mewn pynciau safon Uwch - mae hynny'n arwydd da y bydd PISA yn gwella yn y dyfodol. Mae gennym ni arholiadau newydd, wrth gwrs - rydym ni wedi gwneud yn siŵr eu bod nhw wedi cael eu cyflwyno heb fawr o anhawster. Rydym ni wedi gwneud y penderfyniad i ohirio cyflwyniad y cwricwlwm - dyna'r penderfyniad cywir, a gwyddom fod athrawon a gweithwyr proffesiynol wedi cefnogi hynny. Ac, wrth gwrs, rydym ni'n adeiladu ysgolion ledled Cymru gyfan - ysgolion na fyddent yn cael eu hadeiladu pe byddai ef yn fy swydd i.
English: First Minister, that was a pathetic answer. On your watch - [Interruption.] On your watch - [Interruption.] On your watch, we have had secondary schools in Wales - . And these aren't my comments, because we can't get the data - we've applied to the Welsh Government to have the data that the Cabinet Secretary based her speech on. Here's the speech - . The speech is here; it's her remarks, not my remarks, that say how shameful it has been that, under your Government, we have had secondary schools not entering a single - a single - student for science GCSEs - not A-levels, GCSEs. How on earth can you defend that when you've been First Minister for seven years? These are the remarks of your Cabinet Secretary, not mine, so how can we have confidence that we will see the improvements we need in science, technology, engineering and mathematics when we've had such a laissez-faire attitude from your Government?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, roedd hwnna'n ateb truenus. Yn ystod eich arweinyddiaeth chi - [Torri ar draws.] Yn ystod eich arweinyddiaeth chi - [Torri ar draws.] Yn ystod eich arweinyddiaeth chi, rydym ni wedi bod ag ysgolion uwchradd yng Nghymru - . Ac nid fy sylwadau i yw'r rhain, oherwydd ni allwn ni gael y data - rydym ni wedi gwneud cais i Lywodraeth Cymru i gael y data y seiliodd Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet ei haraith arnynt. Dyma'r araith - . Mae'r araith yn y fan yma; ei sylwadau hi ydyn nhw, nid fy sylwadau i, sy'n dweud mor gywilyddus y mae pethau wedi bod, o dan eich Llywodraeth chi, y bu gennym ni ysgolion uwchradd nad ydynt wedi cyflwyno yr un - dim un - myfyriwr ar gyfer TGAU gwyddoniaeth - nid Safon Uwch, TGAU. Sut ar y ddaear allwch chi amddiffyn hynny a chithau wedi bod yn Brif Weinidog ers saith mlynedd? Sylwadau eich Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yw'r rhain, nid fy rhai i, felly sut gallwn ni fod â ffydd y byddwn ni'n gweld y gwelliannau sydd eu hangen arnom ni mewn gwyddoniaeth, technoleg, peirianneg a mathemateg pan ein bod ni wedi cael agwedd mor laissez-faire gan eich Llywodraeth?