English: Can I thank the Member for his comments? He says, 'Why now?' Well, if not now, when? Because when you are facing change, when you are facing dysfunction, when you are facing the inclarity in the decision-making process, the inclarity in the financial arrangements, and that situation impacts on the lives of people of Wales, when also it impacts on the democratic mandate the Government has and intrudes upon that, then it is necessary to address something that is a longstanding process of dysfunction, which, cross-party - even people like Sir Bernard Jenkin recognise the need for constitutional change. In terms of all the other issues, well, I would have thought the Member might spend his time better if he were to refer to the wasted £500 million of the UK Government on failed privatisation of probation, or maybe the wasted £3 billion on NHS reorganisation, or the wasted £240 million on free school places in England, places that weren't needed, or maybe the £2 billion to companies with links to the Conservative party, or the UK Government that spends £400,000 having chauffeurs driving red boxes around London to Ministers, maybe the £156 million on a contract for ineffective personal protective equipment, or maybe, as The New York Times analysis found, that, of £22 billion of UK Government contracts, £11 billion went to companies that it says were run by friends and associates of politicians in the Conservative party with no prior experience. Now, if you really want to talk about the issues of the economy and the use of public funds, those are the issues that I think you should actually really be addressing. What we are doing is defending and developing Welsh democracy, but democracy with a very clear objective that allows you to participate, as it does every single party in this Senedd, and, indeed, any group and civic organisation throughout Wales. I would hope that you would actually welcome what is being done, that it is something that is positive and it is something that is looking to the future of Wales, something that we all have a direct interest in, rather than making what I think are points that really are just not relevant to the issues and the spirit of the debate that we've had up til now.
Welsh: A gaf i ddiolch i'r Aelod am ei sylwadau? Mae e'n dweud, 'Pam nawr?' Wel, os nad nawr, pryd? Oherwydd pan fyddwch chi'n wynebu newid, pan fyddwch chi'n wynebu camweithredu, pan fyddwch chi'n wynebu'r diffyg eglurder yn y broses o wneud penderfyniadau, y diffyg eglurder yn y trefniadau ariannol, a bod y sefyllfa honno'n effeithio ar fywydau pobl Cymru, pan fydd hefyd yn effeithio ar y mandad democrataidd sydd gan y Llywodraeth ac yn amharu ar hynny, yna mae angen ymdrin â rhywbeth sydd wedi bod yn broses o gamweithredu ers tro, sydd, ac yn drawsbleidiol - mae hyd yn oed pobl fel Syr Bernard Jenkin yn cydnabod yr angen am newid cyfansoddiadol. O ran yr holl faterion eraill, wel, byddwn i wedi meddwl y gallai'r Aelod dreulio ei amser yn well pe bai'n cyfeirio at y £500 miliwn a gafodd ei wastraffu gan Lywodraeth y DU ar breifateiddio'r gwasanaeth prawf yn aflwyddiannus, neu efallai y £3 biliwn a gafodd ei wastraffu ar ad-drefnu'r GIG, neu'r £240 miliwn a gafodd ei wastraffu ar leoedd ysgol am ddim yn Lloegr, lleoedd nad oedd eu hangen, neu efallai'r £2 biliwn i gwmnïau sydd â chysylltiadau â'r blaid Geidwadol, neu Lywodraeth y DU sy'n gwario £400,000 ar yrwyr i yrru bocsys coch o amgylch Llundain ar gyfer Gweinidogion, efallai'r £156 miliwn ar gontract ar gyfer cyfarpar diogelu personol aneffeithiol, neu efallai, fel y gwnaeth dadansoddiad y New York Times ei ddarganfod, bod £11 biliwn allan o gontractau £22 biliwn Llywodraeth y DU, wedi mynd i gwmnïau y mae'n dweud iddyn nhw gael eu cynnal gan ffrindiau a chymdeithion gwleidyddion yn y blaid Geidwadol, heb unrhyw brofiad blaenorol. Nawr, os ydych chi wir eisiau siarad am faterion yr economi a defnyddio arian cyhoeddus, dyna'r materion rwy'n credu y dylech chi wir fod yn ymdrin â nhw. Yr hyn yr ydym ni'n ei wneud yw amddiffyn a datblygu democratiaeth Cymru, ond democratiaeth gydag amcan clir iawn sy'n eich galluogi i gymryd rhan, fel y mae pob un blaid yn y Senedd hon, ac, yn wir, unrhyw grŵp a sefydliad dinesig ledled Cymru. Byddwn i'n gobeithio y byddech chi wir yn croesawu'r hyn sy'n cael ei wneud, ei fod yn rhywbeth cadarnhaol ac mae'n rhywbeth sy'n ystyried dyfodol Cymru, rhywbeth y mae gan bob un ohonom ni ddiddordeb uniongyrchol ynddo, yn hytrach na gwneud yr hyn sydd, yn fy marn i, yn bwyntiau nad ydyn nhw mewn gwirionedd yn berthnasol i'r materion ac ysbryd y ddadl yr ydym ni wedi'i chael hyd yn hyn.