English: So, there is a change in tone, certainly, here, but there's not fundamentally a change in direction. I think it's fair to say that the Government has been stung into a more conciliatory note following the response to the 'Brexit and our land' consultation. It's good to see references to collaboration and co-design in your most recent publication, it's just unfortunate, maybe, that the focus wasn't there from day one. It's also good to see you focus firmly now on rewarding active farmers, as we've already heard, and that tenant farmers will have access to this scheme. It's also welcome to see positive references to a cap on payments and on tapering payments as well, and recognising, of course, economies of scale that would, hopefully, benefit smaller farms in Wales. Now, I pressed you two or three weeks ago on how you thought that you could actually introduce such far-reaching proposals without a clue in terms of what Brexit is going to give us and what the post-Brexit environment is going to look like in terms of our trading relationships - not only with international markets, but, of course, within the UK, potentially, as well - access to markets, whether we're subject to tariffs and, of course, what level of funding is going to be available to us. I think there is a huge irony that your consultation finishes on the day before Brexit, which is the day that everything changes, potentially. I don't want to suggest that we're wasting our time here, but if the goalposts are moving, then if you've consulted on a specific set of proposals, then it may be that we need to revisit some of that. So, it's good that you've actually taken that on board to an extent here, because, as you say, you're not consulting on a specific timescale, because you want to see what happens in terms of Brexit. You're not consulting in terms of transition arrangements, because, obviously, you need to understand what's happening with Brexit and, particularly, on the level of payments that might be available, because, obviously, you need to see what kind of funding is available post Brexit. Well, if it's relevant to all of those, then surely it's relevant to the wider scope, as well, of this consultation. You touched earlier on on the modelling and the impact assessments that the Government is looking to carry out. Can you confirm whether any of that work is going to start before Brexit? Because if it does, then, again, the whole thing changes and the set of circumstances might be totally different after Brexit, particularly in the economic sense that you've touched on in your previous response. So, surely a more meaningful modelling exercise would take into account the lie of the land post Brexit in terms of the economy and other factors that are influencing the future of the sector here. Now, I am concerned, and I share concerns that have been expressed around the Government's capacity to deliver on these proposals. I know you recognise that, although I'm not hearing exactly how you're going to deal with that. To visit all farms, to discuss, agree and deliver complex scheme contracts is going to be hugely resource intensive. So, I want to understand where that resource is coming from, because you said yourself last week you have no idea how much funding you're going to get, even if you're going to get any money at all. I think Boris Johnson has added to that concern recently when he actually said that he thinks that he could probably spend some of it himself. So, there are big, big questions, and you still seem to be intent on ploughing this furrow. Now, the statement that you've issued today commits that funding returned to Wales is not spent elsewhere, and I think that's a positive statement, clearly. But I'm just interested - if there is a shortfall, then can you today commit that the Welsh Government will make up that shortfall? I ask because the Government did exactly that last week, when it comes to the public sector pensions cost, where the UK Government actually fell short in what was provided by it, and that was made up from reserves by the Welsh Government. So, I'd be interested to know whether that principle would be the same for Welsh farmers as well. Just another point as well - it's something I raised with you in your previous statement today, and it's a principle that you accepted there - would you commit to publishing what percentage of responses to this proposed consultation come from Wales, so that we can be clear that this is the expressed opinion of the people of Wales, and not others who wish maybe to influence this process.
Welsh: Felly, mae newid yn y naws, yma, yn sicr ond yn y bôn does dim newid cyfeiriad. Rwy'n credu ei bod yn deg i ddweud bod y Llywodraeth wedi cael ei gwthio i sefyllfa fwy cymodlon yn dilyn yr ymateb i ymgynghoriad 'Brexit a'n tir'. Mae'n dda gweld cyfeiriadau at gydweithio a chyd-gynllunio yn eich cyhoeddiad diweddaraf, ond mae'n anffodus, efallai, nad oedd y pwyslais yno o'r diwrnod cyntaf un. Mae hefyd yn braf eich gweld chi'n canolbwyntio nawr ar wobrwyo ffermwyr gweithgar, fel yr ydym wedi ei glywed eisoes, ac y bydd y cynllun hwn ar gael i ffermwyr tenant. Mae hefyd yn braf gweld cyfeiriadau cadarnhaol at y cap ar daliadau a thapro taliadau hefyd, a chydnabod, wrth gwrs, arbedion maint a fyddai, gobeithio, o fudd i ffermydd llai yng Nghymru. Nawr, pwysais arnoch chi ddwy neu dair wythnos yn ôl i ddweud sut yr oeddech chi'n credu y gallech chi gyflwyno cynigion mor bellgyrhaeddol heb unrhyw syniad o ran yr hyn y bydd Brexit yn ei roi i ni a beth fydd yr amgylchedd ar ôl Brexit o ran ein cysylltiadau masnachu - nid yn unig gyda marchnadoedd rhyngwladol ond, wrth gwrs, o fewn y DU, o bosibl, hefyd - mynediad i farchnadoedd, a ydym yn ddibynnol ar dariffau ac, wrth gwrs, faint o arian fydd ar gael i ni. Rwy'n credu ei bod yn eironig iawn bod eich ymgynghoriad yn gorffen ddiwrnod cyn Brexit, sef y diwrnod y bydd popeth yn newid, o bosibl. Dydw i ddim eisiau awgrymu ein bod ni'n gwastraffu ein hamser yma, ond os yw'r amodau'n newid, yna os ydych chi wedi ymgynghori ar gyfres benodol o gynigion, efallai bod angen i ni ailedrych ar rywfaint o'r rheiny. Felly, mae'n dda eich bod chi wedi ystyried hynny i raddau yma, oherwydd, oherwydd, fel yr ydych yn ei ddweud, dydych chi ddim yn ymgynghori ar amserlen benodol, oherwydd eich bod chi eisiau gweld beth fydd yn digwydd o ran Brexit. Dydych chi ddim yn ymgynghori o ran trefniadau pontio, oherwydd, yn amlwg, mae angen ichi ddeall yr hyn sy'n digwydd gyda Brexit ac, yn arbennig, o ran lefel y taliadau a allai fod ar gael, oherwydd, yn amlwg, mae angen ichi weld pa fath o gyllid sydd ar gael ar ôl Brexit. Hynny yw, os yw'n berthnasol i'r rheiny i gyd, yna siawns nad yw'n berthnasol i gwmpas ehangach yr ymgynghoriad hwn, hefyd. Gwnaethoch chi sôn yn gynharach am y modelu a'r asesiadau effaith y mae'r Llywodraeth yn bwriadu eu cynnal. A allwch chi gadarnhau a oes rhywfaint o'r gwaith hwnnw'n mynd i ddechrau cyn Brexit? Oherwydd os bydd, yna, unwaith eto, mae'r holl beth yn newid a gallai'r amgylchiadau fod yn gwbl wahanol ar ôl Brexit, yn enwedig yn yr ystyr economaidd y cyfeirioch chi ato yn eich ymateb blaenorol. Felly, does bosib na fyddai ymarfer modelu mwy ystyrlon yn ystyried sut y saif pethau ar ôl Brexit o ran yr economi a ffactorau eraill sy'n dylanwadu ar ddyfodol y sector yma. Nawr, rwy'n pryderu, ac rwy'n rhannu'r pryderon sydd wedi eu mynegi ynglŷn â gallu'r Llywodraeth i gyflawni'r cynigion hyn. Rwy'n gwybod eich bod chi'n cydnabod hynny, er nad wyf yn gwybod sut yn union yr ydych chi'n mynd i'r afael â hynny. Mae ymweld â phob fferm, i drafod, i gytuno a chyflawni contractau cynlluniau cymhleth yn mynd i gymryd llawer o adnoddau. Felly, rwyf eisiau deall o ble y daw'r adnodd hwnnw, oherwydd fe wnaethoch chi ddweud eich hun yr wythnos ddiwethaf nad oes syniad gennych chi o ran faint o gyllid y byddwch yn ei gael, os byddwch chi'n cael unrhyw arian o gwbl, hyd yn oed. Rwy'n credu bod Boris Johnson wedi ychwanegu at y pryder hwnnw'n ddiweddar pan ddywedodd ei fod yn credu y gallai o bosib wario rhywfaint ohono ei hun. Felly, mae cwestiynau mawr iawn ac mae'n ymddangos eich bod chi'n dal yn benderfynol o dorri'r gŵys hon. Nawr, mae'r datganiad yr ydych chi wedi'i gyhoeddi heddiw yn ymrwymo nad yw'r cyllid sy'n dychwelyd i Gymru yn cael ei wario mewn mannau eraill, ac rwy'n credu ei fod yn ddatganiad cadarnhaol, yn amlwg. Ond rwy'n awyddus i wybod - os bydd diffyg arian, yna a wnewch chi addo heddiw y bydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn gwneud iawn am y diffyg hwnnw? Rwy'n gofyn oherwydd gwnaeth y Llywodraeth hynny yr wythnos ddiwethaf, o ran cost pensiynau'r sector cyhoeddus, pan oedd Llywodraeth y DU yn ddiffygiol o ran yr hyn a ddarparwyd ganddi, a daeth yr arian o gronfa wrth gefn Llywodraeth Cymru. Felly, byddai diddordeb gennyf wybod a fyddai'r egwyddor honno yr un peth ar gyfer ffermwyr Cymru hefyd. Un pwynt arall hefyd - mae'n rhywbeth a godais yn eich datganiad blaenorol heddiw, ac mae'n egwyddor y gwnaethoch chi ei derbyn - a wnewch chi ymrwymo i gyhoeddi pa ganran o ymatebion i'r ymgynghoriad arfaethedig hwn a ddaw o Gymru, fel y gallwn ni fod yn glir mai dyma'r farn a gaiff ei mynegi gan bobl Cymru, ac nid eraill sydd o bosib yn dymuno dylanwadu ar y broses hon.