techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Diolch. I'm grateful to you for giving away. I've challenged the climate change Minister on this exact point, because on the Quay in my constituency of Carmarthen West and South Pembrokeshire, businesses such as Quayside Orthodontics and Towy Works have suffered flooding. So, do you agree with me that businesses should be treated equally to residential areas when it comes to flood protection?
Welsh: Diolch. Rwy'n ddiolchgar i chi am ildio. Heriais y Gweinidog newid hinsawdd ar yr union bwynt hwn, oherwydd ar y Cei yn fy etholaeth yng Ngorllewin Caerfyrddin a De Sir Benfro, mae busnesau fel Quayside Orthodontics a Towy Works wedi dioddef llifogydd. Felly, a ydych chi'n cytuno â mi y dylai busnesau gael eu trin yn gyfartal ag ardaloedd preswyl mewn perthynas â diogelu rhag llifogydd?
English: Certainly. I completely agree with you. Seeing the devastation of those businesses - . Clwb y Bont only just recently reopened its doors. I was asked, on the day that it was opened, 'Is Clwb y Bont safe in the future, now?' Well, no, it isn't. If there's a small flood, yes, because there are flood protection gates there, provided through funding, but it wouldn't have helped if we'd have seen the amount of water that came during that fateful night. I think for many, many businesses, they are still traumatised now by having experienced floods and, in some instances, having suffered multiple floods. I think Sioned Williams recently relayed, in terms of her region, in terms of that example. So, I think we do need to look, in terms of resilience; it's not just the economic situation. But in light of the climate emergency, we need to do everything possible because small businesses and our town centres are what make communities. It's where people come together, it's where we are able to meet, enjoy and have a key role to play in terms of our climate emergency response. So, I'm very happy to be able to support this today, but also to put that plea, in terms of, please consider also those businesses that are at risk of continued flooding. They need our support as well.
Welsh: Yn sicr. Rwy'n cytuno'n llwyr. Wrth weld y busnesau hynny wedi'u dinistrio - . Dim ond newydd ailagor ei ddrysau mae Clwb y Bont. Gofynnwyd i mi, ar y diwrnod y cafodd ei agor, 'A yw Clwb y Bont yn ddiogel yn y dyfodol nawr?' Wel, na, nid yw'n ddiogel. Os oes llifogydd bach, ydy, oherwydd bod giatiau amddiffyn rhag llifogydd yno, wedi'u darparu drwy gyllid, ond ni fyddai wedi helpu pe baem wedi gweld faint o ddŵr a ddaeth yn ystod y noson dyngedfennol honno. I lawer iawn o fusnesau, rwy'n credu eu bod yn dal i ddioddef trawma nawr o fod wedi profi llifogydd ac mewn rhai achosion, ar ôl dioddef llifogydd ar fwy nag un achlysur. Rwy'n meddwl bod Sioned Williams wedi sôn yn ddiweddar am ei rhanbarth, am yr enghraifft honno. Felly, rwy'n credu bod angen inni edrych, o ran gwytnwch; mae'n ymwneud â mwy na'r sefyllfa economaidd. Ond yn sgil yr argyfwng hinsawdd, mae angen inni wneud popeth posibl oherwydd busnesau bach a chanol ein trefi yw'r hyn sy'n creu cymunedau. Dyma lle daw pobl at ei gilydd, dyma lle gallwn gyfarfod, mwynhau a bod â rhan allweddol i'w chwarae mewn perthynas â'n hymateb i argyfwng hinsawdd. Felly, rwy'n hapus iawn i allu cefnogi hyn heddiw, ond hefyd i apelio arnoch hefyd i ystyried y busnesau sy'n wynebu perygl llifogydd yn gyson. Maent hwy angen ein cefnogaeth hefyd.
English: I call on the Deputy Minister for Arts and Sport, Dawn Bowden.
Welsh: Dwi'n galw nawr ar Ddirprwy Weinidog y Celfyddydau a Chwaraeon i gyfrannu, Dawn Bowden.
English: Indeed.
Welsh: Yn sicr.
English: I'm grateful to you for taking the intervention. It's accepted from across the Chamber that we all celebrate small business this Saturday, but sadly, today in the news - just reading it now - HSBC have confirmed 114 bank closures. If I think of my own local town of Cowbridge, one of the branches is there. There will not be a single high-street branch on the high street now, there won't be. Have you a view on that announcement, and in particular, what the Welsh Government might be able to do to obviously try and encourage banking opportunities for as many small businesses to access and replace the loss of service?
Welsh: Rwy'n ddiolchgar i chi am gymryd yr ymyriad. Mae'n cael ei dderbyn o bob rhan o'r Siambr ein bod i gyd yn dathlu busnesau bach y dydd Sadwrn yma, ond yn anffodus, heddiw yn y newyddion - rwyf newydd ei ddarllen nawr - mae HSBC wedi cadarnhau eu bod yn cau 114 o fanciau. Os meddyliaf am fy nhref leol fy hun, sef y Bont-faen, mae un o'r canghennau yno. Ni fydd un gangen stryd fawr ar y stryd fawr nawr. A oes gennych chi farn ar y cyhoeddiad hwnnw, ac yn fwyaf arbennig, beth y gallai Llywodraeth Cymru ei wneud i geisio annog cyfleoedd bancio i gynifer o fusnesau bach allu cael mynediad atynt i wneud iawn am golli gwasanaeth?
English: I call now on Sam Rowlands to reply to the debate.
Welsh: Rwy'n galw nawr ar Sam Rowlands i ymateb i'r ddadl. Sam Rowlands.
English: The proposal is to agree the motion. Does any Member object? There are no objections. Therefore, the motion is agreed in accordance with Standing Order 12.36.
Welsh: Y cwestiwn yw: a ddylid derbyn y cynnig? A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? Does dim gwrthwynebiad. Felly, mae'r cynnig yna wedi'i dderbyn yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 12.36.
English: That brings us to voting time, and unless three Members wish for the bell to be rung, I will proceed directly to the vote.
Welsh: Mae hynny'n dod â ni at y cyfnod pleidleisio, ac oni bai bod tri Aelod yn dymuno i mi ganu'r gloch, dwi'n symud at y bleidlais.
English: The first vote this afternoon is on item 7, the debate on the petition on protecting the Cambrian mountains by designating them an area of outstanding natural beauty. And I call for a vote on the motion, tabled in the name of Jack Sargeant. Open the vote. In favour 43, 11 abstentions, none against. Therefore, the motion is agreed.
Welsh: Mae'r bleidlais gyntaf y prynhawn yma ar eitem 7 a'r ddadl ar y ddeiseb ar warchod mynyddoedd y Cambria drwy eu dynodi yn ardal o harddwch naturiol eithriadol. A dwi'n galw am bleidlais ar y cynnig, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Jack Sargeant. Agor y bleidlais. O blaid 43, 11 yn ymatal, neb yn erbyn. Felly, mae'r cynnig wedi ei dderbyn.
English: The next vote is on item 8 - the Welsh Conservatives' debate on a Wales COVID-19 inquiry special purpose committee. I call for a vote on the motion, tabled in the name of Darren Millar. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 27, no abstentions, and 27 against. Therefore, as required under Standing Order 6.20, I exercise my casting vote against the motion. The result of the vote therefore is: in favour 27, no abstentions, 28 against. Therefore, the motion is not agreed.
Welsh: Y bleidlais nesaf yw'r bleidlais ar eitem 8, sef dadl y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig ar bwyllgor diben arbennig ymchwiliad COVID-19 Cymru. Dwi'n galw am bleidlais ar y cynnig, a gyflwynwyd yn enw Darren Millar. Agor y bleidlais. Cau'r bleidlais. O blaid 27, neb yn ymatal, yn erbyn 27. Felly, fel sydd yn ofynnol i mi o dan Reol Sefydlog 6.20, rwy'n defnyddio fy mhleidlais fwrw i bleidleisio yn erbyn y cynnig. Canlyniad y bleidlais felly yw: o blaid 27, neb yn ymatal, 28 yn erbyn. Felly, mae'r cynnig wedi'i wrthod.
English: That concludes voting for today.
Welsh: Dyna ddiwedd ar ein pleidleisio ni am y prynhwan yma.
English: Presiding Officer, I did ask during the debate on that -
Welsh: Lywydd, fe wneuthum ofyn yn ystod y ddadl ar hynny -
English: I've moved on to -
Welsh: Rwyf wedi symud ymlaen at -
English: Oh, come on. We've got to know why the Government can't table business.
Welsh: O, dewch. Mae'n rhaid inni wybod pam na all y Llywodraeth gyflwyno busnes.
English: Can I confirm to the Member, I think I did pick up on the fact that he referred to the fact that the Government was not able to table amendments on Friday afternoon of last week to the debate on the COVID inquiry? It has been a subject of correspondence between me and the First Minister, and I'm happy to publish that correspondence so that all Members are aware of the reason the amendments, as proposed by the Government, were not in order for that debate. FootnoteLink
Welsh: A gaf fi gadarnhau i'r Aelod, fy mod yn credu i mi nodi'r ffaith iddo gyfeirio at y ffaith nad oedd y Llywodraeth wedi gallu cyflwyno gwelliannau brynhawn dydd Gwener yr wythnos diwethaf i'r ddadl ar yr ymchwiliad COVID? Bu'n destun gohebiaeth rhyngof fi a'r Prif Weinidog, ac rwy'n hapus i gyhoeddi'r ohebiaeth honno fel bod pob Aelod yn ymwybodol o'r rheswm nad oedd y gwelliannau, fel y'u cynigiwyd gan y Llywodraeth, mewn trefn ar gyfer y ddadl honno. FootnoteLink
English: Okay. And you're not getting, Alun Davies, just to put you on a warning, two points of order in every single Plenary meeting from now on, right. So, that's not setting a precedent.
Welsh: O'r gorau. Ac Alun Davies, i chi gael rhybudd, ni fyddwch yn cael dau bwynt o drefn ym mhob Cyfarfod Llawn o hyn ymlaen, iawn. Felly, nid yw hynny'n gosod cynsail.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. In this debate, I've agreed to give time to Peter Fox, Jayne Bryant and Heledd Fychan to contribute to this debate today. It's a worrying fact that the scale and extent of child sexual abuse online has been steadily increasing. Research by the NSPCC shows a tenfold increase in online sexual abuse offences recorded by police in England and Wales over the last decade. There are now nearly as many crimes being recorded in a month as there were in a year 10 years ago. There is no doubt that technology is advancing at a tremendous rate. And the data shows that grooming is increasingly going up and up across platforms across England and also Wales, recording 70 different apps and games involved in grooming crimes in the last 12 months alone. Multiple social media sites were often used in the same offence. Girls are being disproportionately affected, with research revealing that 80 per cent of the victims in online grooming crimes are in fact girls. The sheer scale and increase in online sexual abuse facing our children is fundamental and is indeed a contravention of their rights under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, particularly articles 19 and 39, which are concerned with freedom from and recovery from violence.
Welsh: Diolch. Yn y ddadl hon, rwyf wedi cytuno i roi amser i Peter Fox, Jayne Bryant a Heledd Fychan gyfrannu at y ddadl hon heddiw. Mae'n ffaith bryderus fod graddau cam-drin plant yn rhywiol ar-lein wedi bod yn cynyddu'n raddol. Mae ymchwil gan yr NSPCC yn dangos cynnydd decplyg wedi bod yn y troseddau cam-drin rhywiol ar-lein a gofnodwyd gan yr heddlu yng Nghymru a Lloegr dros y degawd diwethaf. Erbyn hyn mae bron cymaint o droseddau'n cael eu cofnodi mewn mis ag a gofnodid mewn blwyddyn 10 mlynedd yn ôl. Nid oes amheuaeth fod technoleg yn datblygu ar raddfa aruthrol. Ac mae'r data'n dangos bod meithrin perthynas amhriodol yn cynyddu fwyfwy ar draws y platfformau ledled Lloegr, a Chymru hefyd, a chofnodwyd 70 o apiau a gemau gwahanol yn gysylltiedig â throseddau meithrin perthynas amhriodol yn ystod y 12 mis diwethaf yn unig. Roedd nifer o wefannau cymdeithasol yn aml yn cael eu defnyddio yn yr un drosedd. Mae merched yn cael eu heffeithio'n anghymesur, gydag ymchwil yn datgelu mai merched yw 80 y cant o'r dioddefwyr mewn troseddau meithrin perthynas amhriodol ar-lein. Mae'r raddfa enfawr a'r cynnydd mewn cam-drin rhywiol ar-lein sy'n wynebu ein plant yn sylfaenol ac yn gwbl groes i'w hawliau o dan Gonfensiwn y Cenhedloedd Unedig ar Hawliau'r Plentyn, yn enwedig erthyglau 19 a 39, sy'n ymwneud â rhyddid rhag trais ac adferiad yn sgil trais.
English: I have to say, I don't share Peter Fox's reassurances. I am concerned to see the 'legal but harmful' element removed. What concerns me the most has been the delay. I think it's in all of our interests to ensure that pressure is put on the UK Government to deliver this as quickly as possible.
Welsh: Mae'n rhaid i mi ddweud, nid wyf yn rhannu sicrwydd Peter Fox. Rwy'n bryderus wrth weld yr elfen 'cyfreithiol ond niweidiol' yn cael ei dileu. Yr hyn sy'n fy mhryderu i fwyaf yw'r oedi a fu. Rwy'n credu ei bod o fudd i bawb ohonom sicrhau bod pwysau'n cael ei roi ar Lywodraeth y DU i gyflawni hyn cyn gynted â phosibl.
English: NSPCC Wales have been clear that 200 and more children will suffer sexual abuse online for every month that the Online Safety Bill is delayed. Things change so quickly in this area, and it's impossible for us to safeguard children entirely, but I am very concerned to see the changes, with Twitter now also making redundant staff who have been working specifically in this area. We can see with any platform that changes can happen very quickly. So, of course, there is a very serious element for us in terms of the Welsh Government to look at the implications and the things that we want to see and can support here in Wales, but there is a duty on the UK Government to bring this Bill forward, to reconsider the elements that would strengthen and safeguard children, and we need to do that urgently, because the statistics do show clearly that this is having an impact on children and young people. We have to take action now.
Welsh: Mae NSPCC Cymru wedi bod yn glir y bydd 200 a mwy o blant yn dioddef cam-drin rhywiol ar-lein ym mhob mis y mae'r Bil Diogelwch Ar-lein yn cael ei ohirio. Mae pethau'n newid mor gyflym yn y maes hwn, ac mae'n amhosib i ni ddiogelu plant yn llwyr, ond dwi yn pryderu'n fawr o weld y newidiadau, gyda Twitter rŵan hefyd yn diswyddo staff sydd wedi bod yn gweithio'n benodol yn y maes hwn. Rydym ni'n gallu gweld efo unrhyw blatfform fod newidiadau'n gallu digwydd yn gyflym. Felly, wrth gwrs, mae yna elfen gref i ni o ran Llywodraeth Cymru i edrych ar oblygiadau a'r pethau rydym ni eisiau eu gweld ac yn gallu eu cefnogi yma yng Nghymru, ond mae yna ddyletswydd ar Lywodraeth Prydain i ddod â'r Mesur hwn, i ailystyried yr elfennau fyddai yn cryfhau a diogelu plant, ac mae angen gwneud hynny ar fyrder, oherwydd mae'r ystadegau'n dangos i ni'n glir fod hyn yn cael effaith ar blant a phobl ifanc. Rhaid gweithredu rŵan.
English: Thank you, Dirprwy Lywydd, and I'd like to thank the Member for moving this important short debate. As a Government, we are eager to spread the benefits of the internet and encourage the safe use of technology.
Welsh: Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd, a hoffwn i ddiolch i'r Aelod am gynnig y ddadl fer bwysig hon. Fel Llywodraeth, rŷn ni'n awyddus i ledaenu buddiannau'r rhyngrwyd ac annog defnydd diogel o dechnoleg.
English: Children and young people are highly engaged internet users at increasingly younger ages, as we've heard in the debate this evening. It's no surprise that Ofcom's latest 'Children and parents: media use and attitudes report 2022' found that 99 per cent of children went online last year. Growing up in this digital age, children do not differentiate their online and offline lives in the same way as older generations. They are one and the same. Children and young people expect their rights to be equally upheld online as they do offline, and they are right to do so. As a Government, we are fully committed to making the principles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child a reality for all children in Wales, and I was pleased that, last year, the UNCRC adopted general comment 25, which now sees children's rights apply online as they do offline.
Welsh: Mae plant a phobl ifanc yn ddefnyddwyr rhyngrwyd brwd ar oedrannau cynyddol iau, fel y clywsom yn y ddadl heno. Nid yw'n syndod fod adroddiad diweddaraf Ofcom, 'Plant a rhieni: adroddiad ar ddefnydd o'r cyfryngau ac agweddau atynt 2022', wedi darganfod bod 99 y cant o blant wedi mynd ar-lein y llynedd. Wrth dyfu i fyny yn yr oes ddigidol hon, nid yw plant yn gwahaniaethu rhwng eu bywydau ar-lein ac all-lein yn yr un modd â chenedlaethau hŷn. Maent yr un fath â'i gilydd. Mae plant a phobl ifanc yn disgwyl i'w hawliau gael eu gwarchod ar-lein lawn cymaint ag y maent all-lein, ac maent yn iawn i ddisgwyl hynny. Fel Llywodraeth, rydym wedi ymrwymo'n llwyr i wneud egwyddorion Confensiwn y Cenhedloedd Unedig ar Hawliau'r Plentyn yn realiti i bob plentyn yng Nghymru, ac roeddwn yn falch fod y CCUHP, y llynedd, wedi mabwysiadu sylw cyffredinol 25, sydd bellach yn sicrhau bod hawliau plant yn berthnasol ar-lein fel y maent all-lein.
English: Thank you, all. That brings today's proceedings to a close.
Welsh: Diolch i bawb, a daw hynny â thrafodion heddiw yn y Siambr i ben.
English: Thank you, Chair. Thank you to both of you for joining us this morning. I want to go back to a point that David made, and has raised on several occasions, about the need to reassess the value of properties. Could the two of you discuss that in further detail? Do you agree, Rhys, for example, with the need to reassess the value of houses regularly, and whether that should be on a statutory basis? How often should it be done? Should it be done on the basis of inflation, or should it be done on an annual basis or every five years? What's your vision in that regard, and we'll start with David, because David raised that point initially?
Welsh: Diolch, Gadeirydd. Diolch yn fawr iawn i'r ddau ohonoch chi am fynychu. Dwi eisiau mynd nôl at bwynt ddaru i David ei godi, ac wedi'i godi ambell waith, yn sôn am yr angen i ailasesu gwerth tai. A fedr y ddau ohonoch chi drafod hynny? A ydych chi yn cytuno, Rhys, er enghraifft, â'r angen i ailasesu gwerth tai yn gyson, ac a ddylai fe fod yn rhywbeth statudol? Pa mor aml y dylid ei wneud? A ddylid ei wneud o ar sail chwyddiant, neu a ddylid ei wneud o'n flynyddol, neu bob pum mlynedd? Beth ydy'r weledigaeth am hynny, os gwelwch yn dda? Fe wnawn ni gychwyn efo David, gan mai David ddaru godi'r pwynt i gychwyn.
English: Okay. Thank you very much. And if I can return perhaps to the point that you, Rhys, made, namely that the current failing system brings in exceptions to make the system more progressive, do you see that a system as you have just outlined today would also have to have a series of exceptions? Because I'm thinking about the area that I represent, which is a very rural area, which has, for example, a high number of second homes that drive up the value of property, whilst income in the area is very low. So, the housing market in Aberdyfi and Abersoch, for example, is very different to the markets in other places - the value of the properties is very high, but the income is low. So that market is very different. Would what you are proposing today be able to be tailored to enable low-income areas with high property values to pay for something that is more progressive, to have that more progressive system?
Welsh: Ocê. Diolch yn fawr iawn. Ac os caf i hefyd fynd yn ôl at bwynt roeddech chi, Rhys, yn ei nodi, yn dweud bod y drefn bresennol yn dod ag eithriadau i mewn er mwyn gwneud y system fethedig bresennol yn fwy progressive, a ydych chi'n gweld y byddai system fel dŷch chi'n ei chyflwyno heddiw hefyd yn gorfod cael cyfres o eithriadau? Oherwydd dwi'n meddwl, er enghraifft, am yr ardal dwi'n ei chynrychioli, sy'n ardal wledig iawn, sydd efo, er enghraifft, nifer uchel o ail dai, sydd yn gwthio gwerth tŷ i fyny, tra bod yr incwm yn yr ardal yn isel iawn. Felly, mae marchnad dai rhywle fel Aberdyfi ac Abersoch yn wahanol iawn i farchnad dai yn rhywle arall - mae gwerth y tai yn uchel iawn, ond mae'r incwm yn isel iawn. Felly, mae'r farchnad yna'n wahanol. A fuasai'r hyn dŷch chi'n ei gynnig heddiw yn medru cael ei deilwra er mwyn galluogi ardaloedd efo incwm isel ond gwerth tai uchel i dalu rhywbeth sy'n fwy progressive, i gael system system sy'n fwy progressive?
English: Well, as I understand it, there are policies in the pipeline to make changes in the planning system, in order to separate those two markets - the local market and the second home market. Now, if that is successful, then what we will see happening naturally is that those homes that are available to be holiday homes, then the prices of those properties will increase, and the properties that are only available on the local market, we should see the prices of those houses drop, or at least not grow at the same scale. So, I would hope that that change in the planning system would then feed through into the housing market, and that that would be reflected in the taxes that would need to be paid as a result of that. Do we need to go further than that and have different rates for holiday homes as compared to residential property? Well, I think that's probably a political question, but perhaps there is some basis for considering that. But also, the kind of progressive system that I was talking about, where there are exceptions at a particular price point, where one wouldn't need to pay tax on the first £90,000 of the value of a house, let's say, well, I wouldn't expect that to be in place for second homes in the same way. So again, if you were to make the system more progressive and you had more progressive rates, then that, in and of itself, would favour homes that are used as homes rather than as second homes.
Welsh: Wel, o beth dwi'n ei ddeall, mae yna bolisïau ar y gweill i wneud newidiadau yn y system gynllunio, er mwyn rhannu'r ddwy farchnad yna - y farchnad dai lleol a'r farchnad dai haf. Ac os yw hynny'n llwyddiannus, beth y gwnawn ni ei weld yn naturiol yw bod y tai yna sydd ar gael i fod yn dai haf, bod prisiau'r tai yna'n mynd i gynyddu, a bod y tai sydd ddim ond ar gael ar y farchnad leol, mi ddylem ni weld prisiau'r tai yna'n lleihau, neu o leiaf ddim yn tyfu ar yr un raddfa. Ac felly, mi ddylai, mi fuaswn i'n gobeithio, y newid yna i'r system gynllunio fwydo drwyddo i mewn i brisiau tai, ac wedyn buasai hynny'n cael ei adlewyrchu yn y trethi sydd angen cael eu talu o ganlyniad i hynny. Oes angen mynd ymhellach na hynny, ac adlewyrchu a chael graddfeydd gwahanol ar dai haf a thai preswyl? Dwi'n credu bod hwnna siŵr o fod yn gwestiwn gwleidyddol, ond efallai bod yna ryw sail i hynny. Ond hefyd, y fath o system flaengar rôn i'n sôn amdani, sef bod yna eithriad ar ryw swm lle does dim angen talu treth, dweud, ar y £90,000 cyntaf o werth tŷ, wel eto, fuaswn i ddim yn disgwyl y buasai'r fath beth yn bodoli ar ail gartrefi. Felly, eto, os oeddech chi'n gwneud y system yn fwy blaengar, os oeddech chi'n gwneud graddfeydd yn fwy blaengar, mi ddylai hwnna ynddo'i hun ffafrio tai sy'n cael eu defnyddio fel cartrefi yn hytrach na fel ail dai.
English: Thank you. May I ask the same question to David, but changing the example from second homes to farms, for example, where the farm income can be low but the value of the property is very high? So, one now would be penalised, perhaps, in that regard. So, would it possible to have exceptions or exemptions in that kind of situation? Is that fair?
Welsh: Diolch. Gaf i ofyn yr un peth i David, ond gan newid yr enghraifft o ail dai i, ddywedwn i, ffermydd, lle mae incwm fferm yn medru bod yn isel iawn ond mae gwerth y tŷ yn uchel iawn? Felly, buasai rhywun fel yna, hwyrach, yn cael ei gosbi. Ydych chi'n meddwl bod posib cael eithriadau mewn lle o hyd ar gyfer sefyllfa fel yna, neu ydy hynna yn deg?