English: Thanks very much, Russell. What we don't lack is a target. We've got the target; we're just not meeting the target yet. What we need is a mechanism to reach the target, and that's certainly something we need to make sure that we can deliver on. Many people have talked today about the need to make sure that staffing is in place, for example, and training is in place. Before Christmas, we announced £0.25 billion to focus on training within the NHS. It has been interesting to look at the English planned care proposals that came out yesterday. A massive criticism of that is: where's the plan in terms of training? Well, we've got training plans in place; Health Education and Improvement Wales is on this, they know what needs to be done. I can give you chapter and verse in terms of how many people are going to be trained in each different area of cancer. So, we are doing quite a lot of work. The difference is that we haven't packaged it up, in a way, and there's a reason for that, and the reason for that is because what we've got is an integrated set of policy commitments that were described in the national clinical framework, and what you need to understand is the context in which this cancer plan needs to work. Let me remind you what we're trying to do: we want a clearer, more effective, less duplicative set of policy arrangements that our NHS bodies who actually plan and deliver cancer services can then respond to effectively. I understand the attraction of setting out minute detail in one document on how we're going to solve cancer, but that's just not how a really complex health system is delivered. We've heard today about the need to look at prevention. Well, do you want a whole obesity strategy set out within the cancer plan? It doesn't seem to make any sense to me. We've got a smoking plan as well; we've got lots and lots of different plans that all contribute, so I think we've got to understand how complex this is. At the heart of improving cancer outcomes is identifying someone at risk and getting that diagnostic test done. If we look at who delivers that part of our cancer pathway, they're not cancer services. So, where would we put those? Do we put them in the cancer plan, or do we not put them in the cancer plan? Because they are not cancer specialists; they are general practitioners who first identify whether it needs investigation. They're dentists, they're opticians, they also include screeners and outpatients and emergency department teams. This is where that initial clinical suspicion of cancer arises, and from where people are referred. And when they're referred for an investigation, where do they go? They go to pathologists, they go to radiologists, they go to endoscopists. Do you want all of that? Your plan is going to be massive, Russell. So, I do think that there was an approach that was clearly set out in 'A Healthier Wales', and that's why we've taken this approach.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Russell. Yr hyn nad ydym yn brin ohono yw targed. Mae gennym darged; nid ydym yn cyrraedd y targed eto. Yr hyn sydd ei angen arnom yw mecanwaith i gyrraedd y targed, ac mae hynny'n sicr yn rhywbeth y mae angen inni sicrhau y gallwn ei gyflawni. Mae llawer o bobl wedi sôn heddiw am yr angen i sicrhau bod staff ar gael, er enghraifft, a bod hyfforddiant ar waith. Cyn y Nadolig, fe wnaethom gyhoeddi £0.25 biliwn i ganolbwyntio ar hyfforddiant o fewn y GIG. Mae wedi bod yn ddiddorol edrych ar y cynigion gofal wedi'i gynllunio yn Lloegr a gyhoeddwyd ddoe. Un feirniadaeth enfawr o hynny yw: ble mae'r cynllun ar gyfer hyfforddi? Wel, mae gennym gynlluniau hyfforddi ar waith; mae Addysg a Gwella Iechyd Cymru yn gweithio ar hyn, maent yn gwybod beth sydd angen ei wneud. Gallaf roi'r holl fanylion i chi ynglŷn â faint o bobl sy'n mynd i gael eu hyfforddi ym mhob maes canser gwahanol. Felly, rydym yn gwneud cryn dipyn o waith. Y gwahaniaeth mewn ffordd yw nad ydym wedi'i becynnu, ac mae rheswm dros hynny, a'r rheswm yw mai'r hyn sydd gennym yw set integredig o ymrwymiadau polisi a ddisgrifiwyd yn y fframwaith clinigol cenedlaethol, a'r hyn sydd angen i chi ei ddeall yw'r cyd-destun y mae angen i'r cynllun canser hwn weithio ynddo. Gadewch imi eich atgoffa o'r hyn y ceisiwn ei wneud: rydym am gael set gliriach, fwy effeithiol, lai dyblygol o drefniadau polisi y gall ein cyrff GIG sy'n cynllunio ac yn darparu gwasanaethau canser ymateb iddynt yn effeithiol. Rwy'n deall yr atyniad o nodi manylion mewn un ddogfen sut rydym yn mynd i ddatrys canser, ond nid dyna sut y caiff system iechyd gymhleth iawn ei chyflawni. Rydym wedi clywed heddiw am yr angen i edrych ar atal. Wel, a ydych am gael strategaeth gordewdra gyfan wedi'i gosod o fewn y cynllun canser? Nid yw i'w weld yn gwneud unrhyw synnwyr i mi. Mae gennym gynllun ysmygu hefyd; mae gennym lawer o gynlluniau gwahanol ac mae'r cyfan yn cyfrannu, felly rwy'n credu bod yn rhaid inni ddeall pa mor gymhleth yw hyn. Yn ganolog i wella canlyniadau canser mae adnabod rhywun sy'n wynebu risg a chael y prawf diagnostig wedi'i wneud. Os edrychwn ar bwy sy'n darparu'r rhan honno o'n llwybr canser, nid gwasanaethau canser ydynt. Felly, ble byddem yn rhoi'r rheini? A ydym yn eu rhoi yn y cynllun canser ai peidio? Oherwydd nid ydynt yn arbenigwyr canser; ymarferwyr cyffredinol ydynt sy'n nodi'n gyntaf a oes angen archwilio ymhellach. Deintyddion ydynt, optegwyr ydynt, maent hefyd yn cynnwys sgrinwyr a thimau cleifion allanol ac adrannau brys. Dyma lle y mae'r amheuaeth glinigol gychwynnol o ganser yn codi, a lle y caiff pobl eu hatgyfeirio ohono. A phan gânt eu hatgyfeirio i gael archwiliad, i ble maent yn mynd? Maent yn mynd at batholegwyr, maent yn mynd at radiolegwyr, maent yn mynd at endosgopwyr. A ydych chi am gynnwys hynny i gyd? Bydd eich cynllun yn enfawr, Russell. Felly, credaf fod dull o weithredu wedi'i nodi'n glir yn 'Cymru Iachach', a dyna pam ein bod wedi mabwysiadu'r dull hwn.