techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Care homes have borne the brunt of the COVID-19 crisis, with care home residents accounting for around a third of all deaths. Now, the Welsh Government was allowing untested residents to enter care homes from hospital up until 23 April, which was an absolute scandal that Ministers will have to be held accountable for in an upcoming inquiry, even if they're not always keen to answer questions about it when asked by Members of the Senedd. It took months of pressure before the Welsh Government agreed to roll out a comprehensive weekly testing strategy for care homes, and, until pressure was exerted, there was no new strategy in place. Now, I do welcome the fact that that has been announced today, but Care Forum Wales has said that there was no engagement at all with the sector about what was set to happen. Care homes were let down once again, and I think that that is utterly unacceptable. But can the Minister explain the reason for initially discontinuing these tests given that we had excess capacity, the reason why a replacement scheme was not ready to be implemented and announced immediately, and his justification for not engaging with the sector to explain this? Finally, do you accept, Minister, that this delay in letting the sector know what would happen until the last minute caused unnecessary distress?
Welsh: Y cartrefi gofal sydd wedi dwyn baich argyfwng COVID-19, ac mae preswylwyr cartrefi gofal yn cyfrif am tua thraean o'r holl farwolaethau. Nawr, hyd at 23 Ebrill roedd Llywodraeth Cymru yn caniatáu i drigolion heb eu profi fynd i gartrefi gofal o'r ysbyty, ac roedd hynny'n sgandal llwyr y bydd yn rhaid i Weinidogion fod yn atebol amdano mewn ymchwiliad sydd ar y gweill, hyd yn oed os nad ydyn nhw bob amser yn awyddus i ateb cwestiynau a ofynnir am hyn iddyn nhw gan Aelodau'r Senedd. Cymerodd fisoedd o bwysau cyn i Lywodraeth Cymru gytuno i gyflwyno strategaeth brofi wythnosol gynhwysfawr ar gyfer cartrefi gofal, a hyd nes y rhoddwyd pwysau arnynt, nid oedd strategaeth newydd ar waith. Nawr, rwy'n croesawu'r ffaith bod hynny wedi'i gyhoeddi heddiw, ond mae Fforwm Gofal Cymru wedi dweud na fu unrhyw ymgysylltu o gwbl gyda'r sector ynglŷn â'r hyn a oedd i fod digwydd. Cafodd cartrefi gofal eu siomi unwaith eto, a chredaf fod hynny'n gwbl annerbyniol. Ond a wnaiff y Gweinidog egluro'r rheswm dros roi'r gorau i'r profion hyn yn y lle cyntaf, o gofio bod gennym gapasiti dros ben, y rheswm pam nad oedd cynllun newydd yn barod i gael ei weithredu a'i gyhoeddi ar unwaith, a'i gyfiawnhad dros beidio ag ymgysylltu â'r sector i esbonio hyn? Yn olaf, a ydych chi'n derbyn, Gweinidog, fod yr oedi hwn cyn gadael i'r sector wybod beth fyddai'n digwydd tan y funud olaf wedi achosi trallod diangen?
English: Again, there were a number of points there, acting Deputy Presiding Officer. When it comes to the vulnerability of residents in care homes and the significant number of excess deaths, we still don't have any evidence that discharge arrangements from hospitals are a material factor or, if they are, then how far in the number of excess deaths and, of course, it's never been the case that I've refused to answer Members' questions here in the Senedd.
Welsh: Unwaith eto, roedd nifer o bwyntiau yno, Dirprwy Lywydd dros dro. O ran preswylwyr sy'n agored i niwed mewn cartrefi gofal a'r nifer sylweddol o farwolaethau ychwanegol, nid oes gennym dystiolaeth bod trefniadau rhyddhau o ysbytai yn ffactor perthnasol neu, os ydyn nhw, faint o effaith gafodd hynny ar nifer y marwolaethau ychwanegol ac, wrth gwrs, nid yw erioed wedi bod yn wir fy mod wedi gwrthod ateb cwestiynau'r Aelodau yma yn y Senedd.
English: Minister, I notice you made a new statement today on how you will take the testing regime forward. Obviously, what's critical is replying to those tests and getting the results of the tests back to people who've undertaken the test. I heard your response to Janet Finch-Saunders, but it is a fact that, week on week, it's been a declining response rate, that nearly 20 per cent of test results are not being returned to the person within three days, and only 46 per cent of tests being returned within 24 hours, down from 49 per cent. So, accepting you've made an announcement around a new testing regime, how are you focusing your energies to make sure that, whatever testing regime is in place, the results get back to the recipient as quick as possible, so that they can either get back to work or take the necessary action to isolate and protect?
Welsh: Gweinidog, sylwaf eich bod wedi gwneud datganiad newydd heddiw ynglŷn â sut y byddwch yn bwrw ymlaen â'r drefn brofi. Yn amlwg, yr hyn sy'n hollbwysig yw ymateb i'r profion hynny a chael canlyniadau'r profion yn ôl i'r bobl sydd wedi cael y prawf. Clywais eich ymateb i Janet Finch-Saunders, ond mae'n ffaith, wythnos ar ôl wythnos, bod y gyfradd ymateb yn lleihau, nad yw bron 20 y cant o ganlyniadau profion yn cael eu dychwelyd i'r unigolyn o fewn tri diwrnod, a dim ond 46 y cant o'r profion sy'n cael eu dychwelyd o fewn 24 awr, i lawr o 49 y cant. Felly, gan dderbyn eich bod chi wedi gwneud cyhoeddiad ynghylch trefn brofi newydd, sut ydych chi'n canolbwyntio eich egni i wneud yn siŵr, pa bynnag drefn brofi sydd ar waith, fod y canlyniadau'n dod yn ôl at y derbynnydd mor gyflym â phosib, fel y gallant naill ai fynd yn ôl i'r gwaith neu gymryd y camau angenrheidiol i ynysu a diogelu?
English: First, may I say that it's a shame that it's only by the decision of the Llywydd to extend the time for a topical question that we're having time to discuss this strategy now? Because a statement should have been timetabled for this, because test and trace is so central to the fight against coronavirus, and the strategy over the next few months is so central to our success. It is still a failure in not using the capacity available. I accept entirely that we shouldn't be making ad hoc decisions on testing - we have to be strategic and we do have to test for a purpose, but, first, I do think that planning to reduce testing of care home staff, from the current weekly regime to a fortnightly regime from August, is an unnecessary and risky step at the moment, given the capacity available. And (2) I am disappointed that there is no reference to the need for asymptomatic testing of care workers going into people's homes. I have called for the extension of asymptomatic testing, certainly for those health and care workers who are at greatest risk, both for themselves and the people who they are in contact with, and surely, those people who go into the homes of others to provide care - many people within one day - have to come into that category. Yes, the number of cases has reduced and we take pride in that, but let's keep it that way and look out for the most vulnerable people. So, can we have a commitment on testing for those going into people's homes to provide care?
Welsh: Yn gyntaf, gaf i ddweud ei bod hi'n drueni mai dim ond drwy benderfyniad y Llywydd i ymestyn yr amser ar gyfer y cwestiwn amserol yr ydyn ni'n cael cyfle i drafod y strategaeth yma rŵan? Achos mi ddylid fod wedi amserlennu y datganiad yma ynddo fo'i hun, oherwydd bod profi ac olrhain mor ganolog i'r frwydr yn erbyn y coronafeirws, ac y mae'r strategaeth dros y misoedd nesaf mor ganolog i'n llwyddiant ni. Mae dal yn fethiant, dwi'n meddwl, i beidio â defnyddio'r capasiti sydd ar gael. Dwi'n derbyn yn llwyr, gyda llaw, nad mewn rhyw ffordd ffwrdd â hi mae gwneud penderfyniadau ynglŷn â phrofi - mae'n rhaid bod yn strategol a phrofi i bwrpas, ond (1) dwi yn meddwl bod cynllunio i leihau profi staff cartrefi gofal, o'r profion wythnosol presennol i brofion bob pythefnos o fis Awst, yn gam diangen a cham llawn risg diangen ar hyn o bryd, o ystyried y capasiti sydd ar gael. A (2) dwi'n siomedig nad oes yna gyfeiriad at yr angen i brofi asymptomatig o weithwyr gofal sy'n mynd i mewn i gartrefi pobl. Dwi wedi galw am ymestyn profion asymptomatig, yn sicr i'r holl weithwyr iechyd a gofal hynny sydd â mwyaf o risg iddyn nhw eu hunain ac i'r bobl y maen nhw mewn cysylltiad â nhw, a siawns bod y bobl hynny sy'n mynd i mewn i dai pobl eraill i roi gofal iddyn nhw - nifer o bobl o fewn diwrnod - yn gorfod dod i mewn i'r categori hwnnw. Ydy, mae nifer yr achosion wedi lleihau ac rydyn ni'n ymfalchïo yn hynny, ond gadewch inni ei gadw felly a gofalu am y bobl fwyaf bregus. Felly, gawn ni ymrwymiad i brofi'r bobl sydd yn mynd i mewn i gartrefi pobl i ofalu amdanyn nhw?
English: Can I concur with the comments and questions that were posed by my colleague Janet Finch-Saunders at the opening of this topical questions session? Minister, a lot has been said about the importance of testing and tracking and the issues in the domiciliary care sector. I know that Aneurin Bevan University Health Board have put a particular emphasis recently on testing patients before they leave hospital to go either into a care home setting or back to their own home to a domiciliary care setting. That seems to be a pretty sensible practice. Is that widespread across Wales, and are you looking at ways that testing like this could be extended and other ways that the domiciliary care sector can be made as COVID-free as possible?
Welsh: A gaf i gytuno â'r sylwadau a'r cwestiynau a ofynnodd fy nghyd-Aelod Janet Finch-Saunders wrth agor y sesiwn cwestiynau amserol hon? Gweinidog, mae llawer wedi'i ddweud am bwysigrwydd profi ac olrhain a'r problemau yn y sector gofal cartref. Gwn fod Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Aneurin Bevan wedi rhoi pwyslais arbennig yn ddiweddar ar brofi cleifion cyn iddyn nhw adael yr ysbyty i fynd i gartref gofal neu yn ôl i'w cartref eu hunain i leoliad gofal cartref. Mae hynny'n ymddangos yn arfer eithaf synhwyrol. A yw hynny'n gyffredin ledled Cymru, ac a ydych yn edrych am ffyrdd o allu ymestyn profion fel hyn a ffyrdd eraill o wneud y sector gofal cartref mor rhydd o COVID â phosib?
English: Diolch, Llywydd. Testing in care homes in Wales came too late for too many, and its effectiveness as a tool in the toolbox requires care homes to be operating on a sustainably resourced basis. Speaking in the virtual Welsh Parliament on 3 June, I referred to a nursing home who'd written stating that five residents had suffered COVID-19-related deaths, and that Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board had so far contributed not a single penny towards the COVID-19 crisis. The problem was identified in the subsequent Care Forum Wales cheapskate awards that half of the bottom 10 local authorities in Wales for paying care home fees amongst the coronavirus crisis are in north Wales, with Flintshire the worst of these. Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board said on 15 June in correspondence that the health board is working closely with Care Forum Wales and other health boards across Wales to work with Welsh Government in securing a financial support plan for nursing care and care homes across Wales. But Care Forum Wales e-mailed me a week ago last Wednesday saying, 'Still no announcement, to our ever-increasing frustration.' When are you going to get this sorted, because the care homes are telling me they need this desperately?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Roedd profi mewn cartrefi gofal yng Nghymru wedi dod yn rhy hwyr i ormod o bobl, ac mae ei effeithiolrwydd, fel offeryn mewn blwch offer, yn mynnu bod cartrefi gofal yn gweithredu ar sail gynaliadwy o ran adnoddau. Wrth siarad yn Senedd rithwir Cymru ar 3 Mehefin, cyfeiriais at gartref nyrsio a oedd wedi ysgrifennu yn dweud bod pum preswylydd wedi marw yn gysylltiedig â COVID-19, ac nad oedd Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Betsi Cadwaladr hyd yn hyn wedi cyfrannu'r un geiniog tuag at argyfwng COVID-19. Nodwyd y broblem hon yng ngwobrau 'cheapskate' dilynol Fforwm Gofal Cymru, sef bod hanner y 10 awdurdod lleol isaf yng Nghymru a oedd yn talu ffioedd cartrefi gofal yn ystod argyfwng coronafeirws yn y Gogledd, ac mai Sir y Fflint oedd y gwaethaf. Dywedodd Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Betsi Cadwaladr ar 15 Mehefin mewn gohebiaeth fod y bwrdd iechyd yn cydweithio'n agos â Fforwm Gofal Cymru a byrddau iechyd eraill ledled Cymru i weithio gyda Llywodraeth Cymru i sicrhau cynllun cymorth ariannol ar gyfer gofal nyrsio a chartrefi gofal ledled Cymru. Ond cefais e-bost gan Fforwm Gofal Cymru wythnos i ddydd Mercher diwethaf yn dweud, 'Does dim cyhoeddiad o hyd, i'n rhwystredigaeth gynyddol.' Pryd fyddwch yn datrys hyn, oherwydd mae'r cartrefi gofal yn dweud wrthyf bod taer angen hyn?
English: Thank you, Minister. The next item is the topical question to be answered by the Deputy Minister for Culture, Sport and Tourism, and the question is to be asked by Alun Davies.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Gweinidog. Yr eitem nesaf yw'r cwestiwn amserol sydd i'w ateb gan y Dirprwy Weinidog dros Ddiwylliant, Chwaraeon a Thwristiaeth, ac mae'r cwestiwn i'w holi gan Alun Davies.
English: You need to - . We still can't hear you, Minister.
Welsh: Mae angen i chi - . Ni allwn eich clywed chi o hyd, Gweinidog.
English: We still can't - . There we are. We can hear you -
Welsh: Rydym ni'n dal yn methu - . A, dyna ni. Rydym ni'n eich clywed chi -
English: You can hear me clearly now. Right. Thank you very much to Alun Davies for that question. The media sector is crucial to democracy in any society and the Welsh Government's media policy includes providing support for a diversity of organisations within the media to provide consistent information for citizens, and we deeply regret all of the job losses that may occur in the media sector in Wales in various aspects of the sector over the next few months.
Welsh: Rydym ni'n iawn nawr. Reit. Diolch yn fawr i Alun Davies am y cwestiwn. Mae'r sector cyfryngau yn allweddol i ddemocratiaeth mewn unrhyw gymdeithas ac y mae polisi cyfryngau Llywodraeth Cymru yn cynnwys cefnogi amrywiaeth o fewn y cyfryngau er mwyn sicrhau gwybodaeth gyson i ddinasyddion, ac felly rydym ni'n gresynu am yr holl golli swyddi sydd yn bosib yn y cyfryngau yng Nghymru mewn gwahanol agweddau yn ystod y misoedd nesaf.
English: Thank you, Alun. I wouldn't disagree with anything that you said in that question. My first response is to say that I have asked officials to ensure that we have an opportunity to meet as a matter of haste with officers from the NUJ in north and south Wales, because the media and the newspapers, such as the Western Mail and the Daily Post - all of these sectors are impacted by what this company is proposing to do. So, I look forward to that meeting, and I will ensure that I bring a report from any such meeting back to the Welsh Parliament, so if there is a desire to have cross-party collaboration to respond to this situation, then I would be highly supportive of that. In the meantime, we do have a contribution that we have made through our individual funds within Government to support journalism, and we will continue to do that. That is at the community level, rather than the national level.
Welsh: Diolch, Alun. Fedraf i ddim anghytuno ag unrhyw beth sydd wedi ei ddatgan yn y cwestiwn yna. Fy ymateb cyntaf i yw dweud fy mod i wedi gofyn i swyddogion sicrhau ein bod ni'n cael cyfle i gwrdd yn fuan gyda swyddogion yr undeb newyddiadurol yn y de ac yn y gogledd, oherwydd mae cyfryngau Cymru, y papurau megis y Western Mail, papur y Daily Post yn y gogledd - mae hyn i gyd yn cael ei effeithio gan yr hyn y mae'r cwmni yma yn ei fwriadu. Ac felly dwi'n edrych ymlaen at y cyfarfod yna, ac mi wnaf i sicrhau fy mod i'n dod ag adroddiad o unrhyw gyfarfod felly yn ôl i Senedd Cymru, ac felly os oes yna ddymuniad i gael cydweithrediad aml-bleidiol er mwyn ymateb i'r sefyllfa yma, yna rydw i'n gefnogol iawn i hynny. Yn y cyfamser, mae gyda ni gyfraniad rydym ni wedi ei wneud drwy ein cronfeydd unigol yn y Llywodraeth i gefnogi newyddiaduraeth, ac mi fyddwn ni'n parhau i wneud hynny. Mae hynny ar raddfa gymunedol, nid ar raddfa genedlaethol.
English: I have a number of interests to declare here. I'm a journalist by profession, I'm a member of the National Union of Journalists, I'm also a Member of our national Parliament who appreciates - like all of us here - the importance of effective scrutiny of our democratic institutions, and I'm a consumer of Welsh media, who knows how vital it is that the story of Wales is seen and read and heard and discussed by the people of Wales. The idea of key pillars of Welsh journalism being merged editorially with other news organisations not based in Wales and not focusing in any way on Wales, should worry all of us. I'm worried, of course, for all the journalists affected, but I'm hugely concerned about what it means for our nation. Will the Minister do all he can to intervene, to push for a rethink by Reach, to push for a focus by them, perhaps not on cutting and running, but on trying to create a sustainable and genuinely pan-Wales news venture within their wider organisation? But also, with the market - if we can call it that - clearly failing here, will he pledge to put in place frameworks and support mechanisms that can help sustain a plurality of independent journalism in Wales?
Welsh: Mae gennyf nifer o fuddion i'w datgan yma. Rwy'n newyddiadurwr, rwy'n aelod o Undeb Cenedlaethol y Newyddiadurwyr, rwyf hefyd yn aelod o'n Senedd genedlaethol sy'n gwerthfawrogi - fel pob un ohonom yma - bwysigrwydd craffu effeithiol ar ein sefydliadau democrataidd, ac rwy'n ddefnyddiwr cyfryngau Cymreig, sy'n gwybod pa mor hanfodol yw hi fod stori Cymru yn cael ei gweld a'i darllen a'i chlywed a'i thrafod gan bobl Cymru. Fe ddylem i gyd fod yn poeni am y syniad bod pileri allweddol newyddiaduraeth yng Nghymru wedi'u huno'n olygyddol â sefydliadau newyddion eraill nad ydynt wedi'u lleoli yng Nghymru ac nad ydynt yn canolbwyntio mewn unrhyw ffordd ar Gymru. Rwy'n poeni, wrth gwrs, am yr holl newyddiadurwyr y bydd hyn yn effeithio arnyn nhw, ond rwy'n hynod bryderus am yr hyn y mae'n ei olygu i'n cenedl ni. A wnaiff y Gweinidog bopeth o fewn ei allu i ymyrryd, i bwyso ar Reach i ailfeddwl, i bwyso am bwyslais ganddyn nhw, nid ar dorri a rhedeg efallai, ond ar geisio creu menter newyddion gynaliadwy a gwirioneddol ledled Cymru o fewn eu sefydliad ehangach? Ond hefyd, gyda'r farchnad-os gallwn ei alw'n hynny - sy'n amlwg yn methu yma, a wnaiff addo rhoi fframweithiau a mecanweithiau cefnogi ar waith a all helpu i gynnal lluosogrwydd o ran newyddiaduraeth annibynnol yng Nghymru?
English: Thank you very much for that question. The independence of journalism is crucial, first of all, and I've always had some doubts about state or governmental involvement directly in the media, because I don't think that is appropriate. I've had cause to regret on a number of occasions the unwillingness of media to be independent of their funders, and being independent of Government is just as important - if not more important for me - than being independent from Rupert Murdoch, as has been the case in the past. And therefore, I do commit to seek various ways of operating, but we must seek to operate with haste in this area, and that's why I look forward to meeting officials from unions representing journalists, and I also commit to ask for a meeting with the management of Reach, and I do want to ensure that we have at least two daily newspapers in Wales, in north and in south Wales, the Western Mail and the Daily Post, which are at least national Welsh newspapers.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr am y cwestiwn yna, Rhun. Mae annibyniaeth newyddiaduraeth, yn gyntaf, yn hollbwysig, ac felly mae gen i wastad wedi bod amheuon am gyfraniad gwladwriaethol neu lywodraethol yn uniongyrchol i'r cyfryngau, oherwydd dwi ddim yn credu bod hynny'n briodol. Dwi wedi cael achos i fod yn gresynu sawl gwaith yn y gorffennol ynglŷn ag amharodrwydd cyfryngau i fod yn annibynnol oddi wrth eu cyllidwyr, ac mae bod yn annibynnol o lywodraeth yr un mor bwysig - yn bwysicach i fi - na bod yn annibynnol oddi wrth Rupert Murdoch, fel yr oedd hi yn y gorffennol. Ac felly, dwi yn ymrwymo i chwilio am ffyrdd amrywiol, ond mae'n rhaid inni geisio gweithredu yn gynt yn y mater yma, a dyna pam dwi'n edrych ymlaen at gyfarfod y swyddogion o undeb y newyddiadurwyr, a dwi hefyd yn ymrwymo i ofyn am gyfarfod gyda phenaethiaid Reach a dwi am sicrhau bod gyda ni o leiaf ddau bapur dyddiol yng Nghymru, yn y de ac yn y gogledd, y Western Mail a'r Daily Post, sydd o leiaf yn bapurau cenedlaethol Cymreig.
English: Have you called me?
Welsh: Ydych chi wedi fy ngalw i?
English: Thank you, Jenny. Media, broadcast media, are not devolved to us, and you know that I've taken the line over the years that I wasn't prepared to see one part of broadcasting of cultural production being devolved when, other areas, it wasn't possible for us to influence them. I think there are two avenues to follow here. There has to be a very serious discussion between the cultural Ministers across the nations of the UK about the way in which media agglomeration has developed even more of a threat to democracy in the last 10 years than even it was before then. So, there is an approach there where we should make the issue of independence of media, plurality of sources, plurality of channels of information a matter of a central concern to us, because as we've all agreed, who've spoken so far in this question, we've all agreed that this is a key thing for democracy. But, there is also another area of approach, I think, which is equally important, and I'm glad that you mentioned the international connections. We have to understand that we cannot provide properly independent media in Wales on the basis that it is recreated in terms of regional dominance cross border, and this is what is happening in this case. Therefore, we have to respond to this as well. As a Government, we need to have a policy for communications that enables us to have a clear voice - a clear democratic voice - for all of us who participate in the democratic process in Wales.
Welsh: Diolch, Jenny. Nid yw'r cyfryngau, y cyfryngau darlledu, wedi'u datganoli i ni, ac fe wyddoch fy mod i wedi cymryd y safbwynt dros y blynyddoedd nad oeddwn yn barod i weld un rhan o ddarlledu cynhyrchu diwylliannol yn cael ei datganoli, pan nad oedd modd, mewn meysydd eraill, i ni ddylanwadu arnynt. Rwy'n credu bod dau lwybr i'w dilyn yma. Rhaid cael trafodaeth ddifrifol iawn rhwng y Gweinidogion diwylliannol ar draws gwledydd y DU am y modd y mae crynhoad o'r cyfryngau wedi datblygu hyd yn oed mwy o fygythiad i ddemocratiaeth yn y 10 mlynedd diwethaf nag yr oedd cyn hynny hyd yn oed. Felly, fe ddylem ni sicrhau bod mater annibyniaeth y cyfryngau, lluosogrwydd ffynonellau, lluosogrwydd sianelau gwybodaeth yn destun pryder canolog i ni, oherwydd fel y cytunodd pawb sydd wedi siarad am y mater hwn hyd yn hyn arno, mae'n beth hollol allweddol i ddemocratiaeth. Ond, mae yna agwedd arall hefyd, rwy'n credu, sydd yr un mor bwysig, ac rwy'n falch eich bod wedi sôn am y cysylltiadau rhyngwladol. Rhaid inni ddeall na allwn ddarparu cyfryngau annibynnol priodol yng Nghymru ar sail eu hail-greu o ran goruchafiaeth ranbarthol drawsffiniol, a dyma sy'n digwydd yn yr achos hwn. Felly, rhaid inni ymateb i hyn hefyd. Fel Llywodraeth, mae angen inni gael polisi ar gyfer cyfathrebu sy'n ein galluogi i gael llais clir - llais democrataidd clir - i bob un ohonom sy'n cymryd rhan yn y broses ddemocrataidd yng Nghymru.
English: The next two items, 7 and 8, are withdrawn. So, items 9 and 10 are next. In accordance with Standing Order 12.24, unless a Member objects, I propose that the Curriculum Requirements (Amendment of paragraph 7 (5) of Schedule 17 to the Coronavirus Act 2020) (Wales) Regulations 2020 and the Maintained Schools (Amendment of Paragraph 7 of Schedule 17 to the Coronavirus Act 2020) (Wales) Regulations 2020 be grouped for debate, but with votes taken separately. Does any Member object to the grouping of those regulations? There are no objections.
Welsh: Mae'r ddwy eitem nesaf, 7 ac 8, wedi cael eu tynnu yn ôl. Felly, eitemau 9 a 10 sydd nesaf. Yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 12.24, oni bai fod Aelod yn gwrthwynebu, dwi'n cynnig y caiff y Rheoliadau Gofynion y Cwricwlwm (Diwygio paragraff 7 (5) o Atodlen 17 i Ddeddf y Coronafeirws 2020) (Cymru) 2020 a Rheoliadau Ysgolion a Gynhelir (Diwygio Paragraff 7 o Atodlen 17 i Ddeddf y Coronafeirws 2020) (Cymru) 2020 eu grwpio ar gyfer dadl, ond gyda phleidleisiau ar wahân. Oes yna unrhyw wrthwynebiadau i grwpio'r rheoliadau hynny? Nac oes.