techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you to Jack Sargeant for raising this issue. On the Airbus-Boeing dispute, our understanding is that after the end of the transition period, the UK Government will suspend our retaliatory tariffs against the US, which were imposed in November as part of the EU-wide position. These tariffs were imposed in November as part of the award given to the EU by the World Trade Organization. We are concerned that the UK Government has made this offer without gaining any similar offer from the US to lower its tariffs against us, and we share the UK Government's ambition to reach a negotiated settlement as quickly as possible on this long-running dispute, but we will be seeking some clarification now on this approach from them. And clearly, as Jack Sargeant has said many, many times, a 'no deal' Brexit will be extremely damaging for the UK aerospace industry and for his constituents who are employed in that sector and, therefore, it's important that the UK Government does secure that comprehensive trade deal with the EU, with tariff-free access to EU markets. Of course, I'd be very, very happy to meet with Jack Sargeant to discuss this further.
Welsh: Diolch i Jack Sargeant am godi'r mater hwn. O ran anghydfod Airbus-Boeing, ein dealltwriaeth ni yw y bydd Llywodraeth y DU, ar ôl diwedd y cyfnod pontio, yn atal ein tariffau ad-daliadol yn erbyn yr Unol Daleithiau, a gafodd eu gosod ym mis Tachwedd fel rhan o sefyllfa'r UE gyfan. Cafodd y tariffau hyn eu gosod ym mis Tachwedd fel rhan o'r dyfarniad a roddodd Sefydliad Masnach y Byd i'r UE. Rydym yn pryderu bod Llywodraeth y DU wedi gwneud y cynnig hwn heb gael unrhyw gynnig tebyg gan yr Unol Daleithiau i ostwng ei thariffau yn ein herbyn ni, ac rydym yn rhannu uchelgais Llywodraeth y DU i gyrraedd setliad wedi'i negodi cyn gynted ag y bo modd ar yr anghydfod hirdymor hwn, ond byddwn yn gofyn am rywfaint o eglurhad nawr ar y dull hwn. Ac yn amlwg, fel y mae Jack Sargeant wedi dweud droeon, bydd Brexit 'dim cytundeb' yn niweidiol iawn i ddiwydiant awyrofod y DU ac i'w etholwyr ef sy'n cael eu cyflogi yn y sector hwnnw. Felly, mae'n bwysig bod Llywodraeth y DU yn sicrhau'r cytundeb masnach cynhwysfawr hwnnw gyda'r UE, gyda mynediad di-dariff i farchnadoedd yr UE. Wrth gwrs, byddwn i'n hapus iawn i gwrdd â Jack Sargeant i drafod hyn ymhellach.
English: Trefnydd, I wonder if we could have a statement - and a written statement would do - giving clarity on what the arrangements are after the Christmas period for priority slots for people who were previously shielding, that have been made a priority by retailers, whether those are going to continue. Now, the reason I ask for this is that I know that the Minister for Environment, Energy and Rural Affairs meets regularly with the Welsh Retail Consortium and with the large supermarkets, and I have had some disturbing calls from constituents where the retailers have told them that, as from 2 January, those priority slots will be disappearing, that there's no need for them anymore. Well, actually, if we're going into perhaps more stringent measures after Christmas, as somebody who has had one constituent writing to me who has diabetes and asthma, and is very worried about going out physically shopping, they want to know that they can still have a priority shop. They pay for this shopping; they just want to make sure that they can get it as a priority vulnerable customer. So, could we have a statement on that as soon as possible, hopefully before we rise for the Christmas recess?
Welsh: Trefnydd, tybed a gawn ni ddatganiad - a byddai datganiad ysgrifenedig yn gwneud y tro - yn egluro pa drefniadau ar ôl cyfnod y Nadolig fydd ar gyfer slotiau blaenoriaeth i bobl a oedd gynt yn gwarchod, sydd wedi cael blaenoriaeth gan fanwerthwyr, a yw'r rheini'n mynd i barhau neu beidio. Nawr, y rheswm rwy'n gofyn hyn yw fy mod yn gwybod bod Gweinidog yr Amgylchedd, Ynni a Materion Gwledig yn cyfarfod yn rheolaidd â Chonsortiwm Manwerthu Cymru ac â'r archfarchnadoedd mawr, ac rwyf wedi cael rhai galwadau ffôn pryderus gan etholwyr lle mae'r manwerthwyr wedi dweud wrthyn nhw y bydd y slotiau blaenoriaeth hynny'n diflannu o 2 Ionawr ymlaen, ac nad oes eu hangen mwyach. Wel, mewn gwirionedd, os ydym ni'n mynd i gael mesurau llymach o bosibl ar ôl y Nadolig, fel rhywun y mae un etholwr, sydd â diabetes ac asthma, ac sy'n poeni'n fawr am fynd allan yn gorfforol i siopa, wedi sgwennu ataf eisiau gwybod sut y gall ef fod yn flaenoriaeth o hyd wrth siopa. Mae e'n talu am y siopa hwn; ac mae eisiau gwneud yn siŵr fod ganddo flaenoriaeth fel cwsmer sy'n agored i niwed. Felly, a gawn ni ddatganiad ar hynny cyn gynted ag y bo modd, gobeithio cyn toriad y Nadolig?
English: I thank Huw Irranca-Davies for raising this important issue, and I do think that we should put on record our thanks to all the retailers who have been maintaining priority slots for shielding people at what is a really difficult time and, of course, there's a lot of pressure on those delivery slots at this time of year, but to see those slots prioritised still for shielding people and vulnerable people, I think, is really important. The Minister, as Huw Irranca-Davies says, does meet regularly with the Welsh Retail Consortium and also with the supermarkets. I do know that there's been a discussion with one of the larger supermarkets just this morning, and they have no plans to end the priority slots for those people who have been advised to shield, or who are otherwise vulnerable. So, I think that's a positive sign and I would hope that all of the other supermarkets would follow their lead.
Welsh: Diolch i Huw Irranca-Davies am godi'r mater pwysig hwn, ac rwy'n credu y dylem gofnodi ein diolch i'r holl fanwerthwyr sydd wedi bod yn cynnal slotiau blaenoriaeth ar gyfer pobl sy'n gwarchod ar adeg anodd iawn ac, wrth gwrs, mae llawer o bwysau ar y slotiau cyflenwi hynny yr adeg hon o'r flwyddyn. Ond rwy'n credu ei bod yn bwysig iawn bod y slotiau hynny'n dal i gael eu blaenoriaethu ar gyfer pobl sy'n gwarchod a phobl sy'n agored i niwed. Mae'r Gweinidog, fel y dywed Huw Irranca-Davies, yn cyfarfod yn rheolaidd â Chonsortiwm Manwerthu Cymru a hefyd â'r archfarchnadoedd. Rwy'n gwybod bod trafodaeth wedi bod gydag un o'r archfarchnadoedd mawr y bore yma, ac nid oes ganddyn nhw unrhyw gynlluniau i roi terfyn ar y slotiau blaenoriaeth i'r bobl hynny sydd wedi cael eu cynghori i warchod, neu sydd fel arall yn agored i niwed. Felly, rwy'n credu bod hynny'n arwydd cadarnhaol a byddwn i'n gobeithio y byddai'r holl archfarchnadoedd eraill yn dilyn eu harweiniad nhw.
English: The next item is the motion to suspend Standing Orders, and to do that to allow items 7, 8 and 9 to be debated. I call on the Trefnydd to move that motion.
Welsh: Yr eitem nesaf felly yw'r cynnig i atal Rheolau Sefydlog dros dro, a gwneud hynny i alluogi dadleuon ar eitemau 7, 8 a 9. Dwi'n galw ar y Trefnydd i wneud y cynnig hwnnw.
English: Yes, formally.
Welsh: Ydw, yn ffurfiol.
English: The proposal is to suspend Standing Orders to allow items 7, 8 and 9 to be debated. Does any Member object? No, I see no objections, therefore the motion is agreed in accordance with Standing Order 12.36.
Welsh: Y cwestiwn yw: a ddylid atal Rheolau Sefydlog dros dro i alluogi dadleuon ar eitemau 7, 8 a 9? A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu hynny? Na, dwi ddim yn gweld gwrthwynebiad i hynny, ac felly mae'r cynnig yn cael ei dderbyn yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 12.36.
English: Secondly, a motion to suspend Standing Orders to allow a debate on item 17. I call on the Trefnydd to formally move.
Welsh: Ac yn ail felly, cynnig i atal Rheolau Sefydlog dros dro i alluogi dadl ar eitem 17. Galw ar y Trefnydd i wneud y cynnig hwnnw'n ffurfiol.
English: The proposal is to suspend Standing Orders to allow item 17 to be debated. Does any Member object? I see no objections to that, and therefore that motion is agreed in accordance with Standing Order 12.36.
Welsh: Y cwestiwn yw: a ddylid atal Rheolau Sefydlog dros dro er mwyn galluogi dadl ar eitem 17? Oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu i hynny? Dwi ddim yn gweld gwrthwynebiad i hynny, ac felly mae'r cynnig yna wedi'i dderbyn yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 12.36.
English: Item 3 has been postponed and we will now take a short break whilst changeovers take place in the Siambr. A short break.
Welsh: Mae eitem 3 wedi ei ohirio ac felly fe fyddwn ni'n cymryd egwyl fer nawr tra bod yna newidiadau yn cael eu caniatáu yn y Siambr. Egwyl fer, felly.
English: We reconvene with item 4 on our agenda, which is a statement by the Counsel General and Minister for European Transition. I call on the Counsel General to make the statement - Jeremy Miles.
Welsh: Rydym ni am ailddechrau'r cyfarfod llawn gydag eitem 4 ar ein hagenda, sef datganiad gan y Cwnsler Cyffredinol a'r Gweinidog Pontio Ewropeaidd. Rwy'n galw ar y Cwnsler Cyffredinol i wneud y datganiad - Jeremy Miles.
English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. On Sunday, yet another milestone in the negotiations on the UK's future relationship with the EU passed, again without a breakthrough. I was expecting to be able to update you today on the precise nature of our future relationship with the EU. I had hoped to mention the key actions that businesses, citizens and public services would now need to take to prepare for the changes that we will face in just 16 days' time. Clearly, I'm not in a position to do that, which is completely unacceptable. How can businesses prepare effectively when they don't know what they are preparing for, and without knowing whether tariffs and additional bureaucracy will be in place? How can police and security services protect us next month if they don't know whether they will have access to crucial systems and data? How can anyone who needs to travel plan when they don't know which air services will be operating?
Welsh: Diolch, Ddirprwy Lywydd. Ddydd Sul, pasiwyd carreg milltir arall fyth yn y trafodaethau ar berthynas y Deyrnas Unedig gyda'r Undeb Ewropeaidd yn y dyfodol, eto heb ddod i gytundeb. Roeddwn i'n disgwyl gallu rhoi'r wybodaeth ddiweddaraf ichi heddiw ar union natur ein perthynas gyda'r Undeb Ewropeaidd yn y dyfodol. Roeddwn i'n disgwyl gallu crybwyll y camau allweddol y bydd nawr angen i fusnesau, dinasyddion a gwasanaethau cyhoeddus eu cymryd i baratoi ar gyfer y newidiadau sydd o'n blaenau ni mewn dim ond 16 diwrnod. Mae'n amlwg nad ydw i mewn sefyllfa i wneud hynny, sy'n gwbl annerbyniol. Sut y gall busnesau baratoi'n effeithiol heb wybod ar gyfer beth y maen nhw'n paratoi, a heb wybod a fydd yna dariffau neu fiwrocratiaeth ychwanegol? Sut y gall yr heddlu a'r gwasanaethau diogelwch ein diogelu ni fis nesaf heb wybod a fydd ganddyn nhw fynediad at systemau a data hanfodol? Sut gall unrhyw un sydd angen teithio gynllunio pan nad ydym yn gwybod pa wasanaethau hedfan fydd yn gweithredu?
English: Can you wind up, please?
Welsh: A wnewch chi roi pen ar y mwdl, os gwelwch chi'n dda?
English: I will. And do you also accept that there are a whole host of powers? You asked me for a copy of the list of powers last week. I've got a copy of them in my hand, which I'll be happy to present to you outside of the Chamber. But there are scores of new powers - a big transfer of powers - coming to Wales as a result of our departure from the EU, and I would very much hope that you would welcome them. And just in case you - . This is the one thing that you don't seem to appear to have any knowledge of, but I've got a copy of them here. I'd be happy to relay that to you outside the Chamber later on. Thank you.
Welsh: Fe wnaf i. Ac a ydych chi'n derbyn hefyd fod yna lu o bwerau? Fe wnaethoch chi ofyn imi yr wythnos ddiwethaf am gopi o'r rhestr o bwerau. Mae gennyf gopi yn fy llaw, ac fe fyddaf i'n hapus i'w roi ichi y tu allan i'r Siambr. Ond mae ugeiniau o bwerau newydd - trosglwyddiad mawr o bwerau - yn dod i Gymru o ganlyniad i'n hymadawiad â'r UE, ac fe fyddwn i'n gobeithio'n fawr y byddech chi'n eu croesawu nhw. A rhag ofn ichi - . Dyma'r un peth nad yw'n ymddangos bod gennych unrhyw wybodaeth ohono, ond mae gennyf gopi yma. Fe fyddwn i'n hapus i'w trosglwyddo nhw i chi y tu allan i'r Siambr yn nes ymlaen. Diolch.
English: Thank you for the statement, Counsel General. A hearing of the Welsh Affairs Select Committee earlier this month was told that 61 per cent of exports from Wales go to the EU, compared with 43 per cent of all UK exports. Wales also has a high proportion of industries that are expected to face high tariffs if no deal is reached, and to name a few: automotive, dairy, meat and aerospace. The apparent oven-ready deal and easy agreements were fictitious, as we now all know. About as oven-ready as a deeply frozen Christmas turkey. So, safety and security is also a key area to resolve, and, so, I very much welcome the preparedness of the Welsh civil contingency planning preparations and our medicines availability. This is not about illusionary sovereignty. So, Counsel General, the Confederation of British Industry Wales has clearly stated that a Brexit deal between the UK and the EU is essential. The CBI are clear, as is this Government, that no one has voted for lesser security, or 'no deal' devastation of our trade and economy, or higher food prices, or scarcer medicine availability, or UK border ports congestion and what that would mean. Counsel General, then, what are the consequences of any 'no deal' on the Welsh economy and the relationship between Wales and Europe in 2021? And, critically, what would this mean for the people of Wales, whether you are a leaver or a remainer?
Welsh: Diolch am y datganiad, Cwnsler Cyffredinol. Fe ddywedwyd wrth wrandawiad o'r Pwyllgor Dethol ar Faterion Cymreig yn gynharach y mis hwn fod 61 y cant o allforion Cymru yn mynd i'r UE, o'i gymharu â 43 y cant o holl allforion y DU. Mae gan Gymru gyfran uchel o ddiwydiannau hefyd y disgwylir iddyn nhw fod yn wynebu tariffau uchel os na chawn gytundeb, gan enwi rhai yn unig: modurol, llaeth, cig ac awyrofod. Roedd y fargen parod i'r ffwrn a'r cytundebau hawdd yn ffantasïol, fel y gwyddom ni i gyd nawr. Tua'r un mor barod i'w goginio â thwrci Nadolig wedi ei rewi'n gorn. Felly, mae diogelwch a sicrwydd yn faes allweddol i'w ddatrys hefyd, ac, felly, rwy'n croesawu'r paratoadau cynllunio sifil wrth gefn a'r meddyginiaethau sydd ar gael i ni yng Nghymru. Nid yw hynny'n ymwneud â sofraniaeth afreal. Felly, Cwnsler Cyffredinol, mae Cydffederasiwn Diwydiant Prydain yng Nghymru wedi datgan yn hyglyw fod cytundeb Brexit rhwng y DU a'r UE yn hanfodol. Mae'r CBI yn glir, fel y mae'r Llywodraeth hon, nad oes neb wedi pleidleisio o blaid llai o ddiogelwch, na dinistr 'heb gytundeb' ar ein masnach a'n heconomi ni, na phrisiau bwyd uwch, na mwy o brinder y meddyginiaethau sydd ar gael, na thagfeydd mewn porthladdoedd ar y ffiniau yn y DU a'r hyn y byddai hynny'n ei olygu. Cwnsler Cyffredinol, felly, beth yw canlyniadau dim cytundeb ar economi Cymru a'r berthynas rhwng Cymru ac Ewrop yn 2021? Ac, yn hollbwysig, beth fyddai hyn yn ei olygu i bobl Cymru, os ydych yn dymuno gadael neu aros?
English: [ Inaudible. ] - three letters on fisheries, level playing field and governance, which I sent to Michael Gove a number of weeks ago, that set out our preferred position in relation to each of those outstanding areas. I've asked for the opportunity, in more than one Joint Ministerial Committee (EU Negotiations), to be party to the strategic trade-offs that the UK Government is considering in these closing weeks, and we've been denied the opportunity of participating in that. So, in the absence of that - . And I refer him to the letters, which I'm sure he would have read, that set out very faithfully the Welsh Government's position in relation to how this should be negotiated. These are the UK Government's negotiations, they're not the Welsh Government's negotiations, and the reason we are 16 days away from the end of transition without an agreement is not the responsibility of the Welsh Government; it is the responsibility of the Government of the United Kingdom.
Welsh: [ Anhyglyw. ] - tri llythyr ynglŷn â physgodfeydd, maes chwarae teg a llywodraethu, a anfonais i at Michael Gove nifer o wythnosau yn ôl, a oedd yn nodi ein safbwynt dewisol ni o ran pob un o'r meysydd hynny sydd ar ôl. Rwyf wedi gofyn am gyfle, mewn mwy nag un o gyfarfodydd y Cyd-bwyllgor Gweinidogion (Negodiadau'r UE), i fod â rhan yn y trafodaethau strategol y mae Llywodraeth y DU yn eu hystyried yn yr wythnosau diwethaf hyn, ac nid ydym wedi cael y cyfle i gymryd rhan yn y rhain. Felly, yn absenoldeb hynny - . Ac rwy'n ei gyfeirio at y llythyrau, ac rwy'n siŵr ei fod wedi eu darllen nhw, sy'n nodi safbwynt Llywodraeth Cymru yn gywir iawn o ran sut y dylid trafod hyn. Trafodaethau Llywodraeth y DU yw'r rhain, nid trafodaethau Llywodraeth Cymru, ac nid Llywodraeth Cymru sy'n gyfrifol ein bod ni 16 diwrnod oddi wrth ddiwedd y cyfnod pontio heb gytundeb; Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig sy'n gyfrifol am hynny.
English: The Counsel General is so transparent. He never wanted Brexit, he's done everything he possibly could in the last four and a half years to sabotage it, he just failed to give David Rowlands an answer to his question. It's perfectly clear from his statement that his idea of a negotiation is for us simply to accept meekly whatever demands, however absurd or unreasonable, Monsieur Barnier makes - the kind of negotiation that Marshal Pétain conducted with Hitler in 1940. In his statement, he said this, that the UK Government and the EU should 'show the flexibility and the compromise that are needed to find an agreement.' Could he just tell me now what is the compromise that the EU should be making in order to reach an agreement with the UK Government? Is it a compromise on their demand that they should continue to legislate for us, even though we no longer have a voice or a vote in the councils of the EU? Is it that we should continue to allow European countries to have unfettered access to British waters so that they can hoover up as many fish as possible? Exactly what are the compromises that he thinks that the EU should be making at this time in order to get a deal?
Welsh: Mae'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol yn dryloyw iawn. Nid oedd ef erioed wedi dymuno Brexit, mae wedi gwneud popeth o fewn ei allu yn y pedair blynedd a hanner diwethaf i'w danseilio, ac fe fethodd â rhoi ateb i gwestiwn David Rowlands. Mae'n gwbl amlwg o'i ddatganiad mai ei syniad ef o drafodaeth yw ein bod yn derbyn yn syml pa ofynion bynnag a wnaiff Monsieur Barnier, waeth pa mor hurt neu afresymol ydynt - y math o drafodaethau a gynhaliwyd gan Marshal Pétain gyda Hitler ym 1940. Yn ei ddatganiad, fe ddywedodd hyn, y dylai Llywodraeth y DU a'r UE 'ddangos yr hyblygrwydd a'r cyfaddawd sydd eu hangen i ddod o hyd i gytundeb.' A wnaiff ef ddweud wrthyf i nawr beth fydd yr UE yn ei gyfaddawdu ar gyfer dod i gytundeb â Llywodraeth y DU? A yw hynny'n gyfaddawdu o ran eu galw nhw y dylen nhw barhau i ddeddfu ar ein rhan ni, er nad oes gennym ni lais na phleidlais mwyach yng nghynghorau'r UE? A ddylem ni barhau i ganiatáu i wledydd Ewrop gael rhwydd hynt i bysgota cymaint o bysgod a phosibl o ddyfroedd Prydain? Beth yn union yw'r cyfaddawdau y mae ef yn credu y dylai'r UE fod yn eu gwneud nawr i gael cytundeb?
English: Well, I think the answer to Neil Hamilton's question is the same answer that I gave to David Rowlands's question.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n credu mai'r un yw'r ateb i gwestiwn Neil Hamilton ag a roddais i gwestiwn David Rowlands.
English: Thank you very much, Counsel General. We now move on. In accordance with Standing Order 12.24, unless a Member objects, the three motions under items 5, 6 and 7 on our agenda, the health protection (coronavirus restrictions) regulations 2020, will be grouped for debate, but with a separate vote. I see no objections to that proposal.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn, Cwnsler Cyffredinol. Rydym yn symud ymlaen nawr. Yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 12.24, oni bai bod Aelod yn gwrthwynebu, bydd y tri chynnig o dan eitemau 5, 6 a 7 ar ein hagenda ni, y rheoliadau diogelu iechyd (cyfyngiadau coronafeirws) 2020, yn cael eu grwpio i'w trafod, ond gyda phleidlais ar wahân. Nid wyf i'n gweld unrhyw wrthwynebiadau i'r cynnig hwnnw.
English: Thank you. No Member has indicated they wish to make an intervention, therefore I'll call on the Minister for Health and Social Services to reply to the debate. Vaughan Gething.
Welsh: Diolch. Ni fynegodd unrhyw Aelod ei fod yn dymuno ymyrryd, felly rwyf am alw ar y Gweinidog Iechyd a Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol i ymateb i'r ddadl. Vaughan Gething.
English: Thank you. The proposal is to agree the motion under item 5. Does any Member object? [ Objection.] Therefore, we defer voting under this item until voting time.
Welsh: Diolch. Y cynnig yw derbyn y cynnig o dan eitem 5. A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? [ Gwrthwynebiad.] Felly, gohiriwn bleidleisio ar yr eitem hon tan y cyfnod pleidleisio.
English: The proposal is to agree the motion under item 6. Does any Member object? No. Therefore the motion is agreed in accordance with Standing Order 12.36.
Welsh: Y cynnig yw derbyn y cynnig o dan eitem 6. A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? Nac oes. Felly, derbynnir y cynnig yn unol â Rheol Sefydlog 12.36.
English: The proposal is to agree the motion under item 7. Does any Member object? [ Objection.] Therefore, I defer voting under this item until voting time.
Welsh: Y cynnig yw derbyn y cynnig o dan eitem 7. A oes unrhyw Aelod yn gwrthwynebu? [ Gwrthwynebiad.] Felly, gohiriaf bleidleisio ar yr eitem hon tan y cyfnod pleidleisio.
English: Item 8 on our agenda this afternoon is the Public Health (Protection from Eviction) (Wales) (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020, and I call on the Minister for Housing and Local Government to move the motion. Julie James.
Welsh: Eitem 8 ar ein hagenda y prynhawn yma yw Rheoliadau Iechyd y Cyhoedd (Gwarchodaeth rhag Troi Allan) (Cymru) (Coronafeirws) 2020, a galwaf ar y Gweinidog Tai a Llywodraeth Leol i gynnig y cynnig. Julie James.
English: Just some brief comments.
Welsh: Dim ond rhai sylwadau byr sydd gen i.
English: Under the regulations, Minister, the evictions will only be prevented until 11 January, as you've set out. Of course this is welcome, but we also all know that, by mid January, we could well be in an even worse situation with the pandemic than we are now. And realistically, the impact of vaccination won't be felt until well into the spring in the best-case scenario. So, surely, we simply can't have evictions for public health reasons for a far longer period. So, we in Plaid will be voting in favour of these regulations this evening, but could I just ask the Minister why the Government keeps only staying the eviction of vulnerable people by a few weeks at a time incrementally, instead of guaranteeing that support for as long as it's necessary? Is there a technical reason why this is? Surely, the eviction of anyone during a pandemic would be unconscionable. I know that the Minister will agree with me on that point, so I'd welcome her comments just on that point, please. Diolch.
Welsh: O dan y rheoliadau, Gweinidog, dim ond tan 11 Ionawr y caiff troi allan ei atal, fel yr ydych chi wedi ei nodi. Wrth gwrs, mae hyn i'w groesawu, ond fe wyddom ni i gyd hefyd, erbyn canol mis Ionawr, y gallem ni fod mewn sefyllfa waeth fyth gyda'r pandemig nag yr ydym ni nawr. Ac yn realistig, ni fydd effaith brechu i'w gweld tan ymhell i'r gwanwyn yn y sefyllfa orau. Felly, does dim dwywaith, ni allwn ni weld troi allan am resymau iechyd y cyhoedd am gyfnod llawer hirach. Felly, byddwn ni ym Mhlaid Cymru yn pleidleisio o blaid y rheoliadau hyn heno, ond a gaf i ofyn i'r Gweinidog pam nad yw'r Llywodraeth ond yn parhau i gynyddu'r cyfnod sy'n amddiffyn pobl sy'n agored i niwed rhag cael eu troi allan fesul ychydig wythnosau'n raddol, yn hytrach na gwarantu'r gefnogaeth honno gyhyd ag y bo angen? Oes rheswm technegol pam mai fel hyn y mae hi? Siawns nad yw troi unrhyw un allan yn ystod pandemig yn ddigydwybod. Rwy'n gwybod y bydd y Gweinidog yn cytuno â mi o ran y sylw yna, felly byddwn yn croesawu ei sylwadau dim ond ynglŷn â hynny, os gwelwch yn dda. Diolch.