English: I'll be voting against the Welsh Government's relationships and sexuality education code today. As the Minister will be well aware from debates that were held in the previous Senedd, I regard parents as the primary educators of their children, not the state, and I believe that the Welsh Government's removal of the parental right to withdraw their children from sex education lessons was a massive retrograde step for parental rights and choice, and, given the fact that parents can no longer withdraw their children from sex education lessons, it is absolutely critical that the new RSE code is as respectful and accommodating as possible to the wide variety of views that people hold on this very important subject. But I regret that the code before us today and the draft statutory guidance that was shared with Members late this morning do not do that. What is clear is that the Welsh Government is trying to disguise a controversial set of ideas over which there's a great deal of debate as some sort of settled catalogue of truths that all pupils in the country should be taught. But the reality is far from that. The reality is that there's a great deal of debate, even within the LGBTQ+ community, on the impact that the code may have, particularly on women's rights, and there are real concerns that the views of faith and black, Asian and minority ethnic communities across Wales risk being demonised and discriminated against. The code is very heavy on respect, but it's clear that that respect does not seem to extend to many Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs, members of other faiths, members of the LGBTQ+ community or those whose views may be at odds with those espoused by the Welsh Government. The evidence suggests that the code and the draft guidance have been influenced heavily from a particularly woke ideological viewpoint, and the draft guidance in particular screams 'woke'. Out of the 4,000 words of which it's comprised, we see the words 'male' mentioned just once; 'female' twice, both in relation to female genital mutilation; 'men' doesn't appear at all, and neither do the words 'girl', 'boy', 'straight' or 'heterosexual'. Any relationships and sexuality education code that seeks to avoid these words simply isn't worth the paper it's written on. Now, as the Government of the day, I respect that you have the right to design the curriculum in the way that you see fit, but you do not have the right to teach children as young as 11 an inappropriate, sexually loaded curriculum, promoting an understanding of how of how all are entitled to, and I quote, 'pleasurable relationships'. Doing that without parental consent, in my view, is wholly unacceptable, so I urge all Members today to reject this code and the draft guidance emanating from it, and I urge the Welsh Government to go back to the drawing board, to engage more with parents, to engage more with faith communities and a more diverse range of voices from the LGBTQ+ community. Develop a new code that addresses their concerns, I urge you.
Welsh: Byddaf yn pleidleisio yn erbyn cod addysg cydberthynas a rhywioldeb Llywodraeth Cymru heddiw. Fel y bydd y Gweinidog yn ymwybodol iawn o ddadleuon a gafodd eu cynnal yn y Senedd flaenorol, rwyf i o'r farn mai rhieni yw prif addysgwyr eu plant, nid y wladwriaeth, ac rwyf i'n credu bod camau Llywodraeth Cymru i ddileu hawl rhieni i dynnu eu plant yn ôl o wersi addysg rhyw enfawr tuag yn ôl o ran hawliau a dewis rhieni, ac, o ystyried y ffaith na chaiff rhieni dynnu eu plant yn ôl o wersi addysg rhyw mwyach, mae'n gwbl hanfodol bod y cod addysg cydberthynas a rhywioldeb newydd mor barchus a chynhwysol â phosibl i'r amrywiaeth eang o safbwyntiau sydd gan bobl ar y pwnc pwysig iawn hwn. Ond mae'n flin gen i ddweud nad yw'r cod sydd ger ein bron heddiw a'r canllawiau statudol drafft a gafodd eu rhannu ag Aelodau yn hwyr y bore yma yn gwneud hynny. Yr hyn sydd yn amlwg yw bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn ceisio celu cyfres ddadleuol o syniadau y mae llawer iawn o ddadlau yn eu cylch fel rhyw fath o gatalog sefydlog o wirioneddau y dylid eu haddysgu i bob disgybl yn y wlad. Ond mae'r realiti ymhell o hynny. Y gwir amdani yw bod llawer iawn o ddadlau, hyd yn oed o fewn y gymuned LGBTQ+, ar yr effaith y gallai'r cod ei chael, yn enwedig ar hawliau menywod, ac mae pryderon gwirioneddol bod barn pobl dduon, Asiaidd a lleiafrifoedd ethnig ledled Cymru mewn perygl o gael eu cythreulio a gwahaniaethu yn eu herbyn. Mae pwyslais mawr iawn yn y cod ar barch, ond mae'n amlwg nad yw'n ymddangos bod y parch hwnnw'n ymestyn i lawer o Gristnogion, Mwslimiaid, Iddewon, Hindŵiaid, Sikhiaid, aelodau o grefyddau eraill, aelodau o'r gymuned LGBTQ+ na'r rhai y gallai eu barn fod yn groes i'r rhai y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn eu harddel. Mae'r dystiolaeth yn awgrymu bod y cod a'r canllawiau drafft wedi eu dylanwadu'n fawr o safbwynt ideolegol sy'n ymwybodol iawn o bechu, ac mae'r canllawiau drafft yn arbennig yn sgrechian hynny. O'r 4,000 o eiriau sydd ynddyn nhw, rydym yn gweld y geiriau 'gwryw' yn cael ei grybwyll unwaith yn unig; 'benyw' ddwywaith, a'r ddau wrth drafod anffurfio organau rhywiol menywod; nid yw 'dynion' yn ymddangos o gwbl, nac ychwaith y geiriau 'merch', 'bachgen', 'syth' na 'heterorywiol'. Nid yw unrhyw god addysg cydberthynas a rhywioldeb sy'n ceisio osgoi'r geiriau hyn yn werth y papur y mae wedi ei ysgrifennu arno. Nawr, fel Llywodraeth y dydd, rwy'n parchu bod gennych yr hawl i gynllunio'r cwricwlwm yn y ffordd yr ydych chi'n ei ystyried sy'n addas, ond nid oes gennych chi'r hawl i addysgu cwricwlwm amhriodol, wedi ei lwytho'n rhywiol, sy'n hyrwyddo dealltwriaeth o sut y mae gan bawb hawl i, ac rwy'n dyfynnu, 'perthnasoedd pleserus' i blant mor ifanc ag 11 oed. Mae gwneud hynny heb ganiatâd rhieni, yn fy marn i, yn gwbl annerbyniol, felly rwy'n annog yr holl Aelodau heddiw i wrthod y cod hwn a'r canllawiau drafft sy'n deillio ohono, ac yn annog Llywodraeth Cymru i ddechrau o'r dechrau, i ymgysylltu'n fwy â rhieni, i ymgysylltu'n fwy â chymunedau ffydd ac amrywiaeth fwy amrywiol o leisiau o'r gymuned LGBTQ+. Rwy'n eich annog i ddatblygu cod newydd sy'n mynd i'r afael â'u pryderon.