English: Diolch, Llywydd. I disagree with Janet Finch-Saunders that we should simplify the postal vote verification system. We have to make sure that the person who's casting the vote is the person who's entitled to do so. But I do wonder whether - . I agree that many votes are actually put in the bin because they haven't filled in the form properly, and I wondered whether we can consider sending back that vote to the person who failed to complete the verification, explaining that the vote was null and void, and that would then possibly enable them to consider not voting by post next time. I think people with literacy or learning difficulties should be discouraged from voting by post because it's much simpler to go to a polling station, where all they've got to do is find the candidate they wish to vote for on the list. But I do think your proposals around electronic voting and different days for voting enable us to ensure that people who have difficulty going to a particular place, which is open for 15 hours - . We could have roving voting polling stations, for example, in care homes or in supermarkets for very short periods of time, which would enable people who have difficulty walking to the polling station - enable the polling station to come to them. That is what electronic voting systems would enable us to do. When you're thinking about how we actually improve the accuracy of the electoral register, don't let's just think of school students, but those who are providing homecare ought to be able to automatically register somebody who'd dropped off the register because of their illness. Registered care homes and nursing homes ought to be obliged to register people who become their residents, who may indeed have difficulties conducting that sort of registration electronically. I'm happy to see -
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Rwy'n anghytuno â Janet Finch-Saunders y dylem symleiddio'r system sy'n gwirio pleidleisiau drwy'r post. Mae'n rhaid inni wneud yn siŵr mai'r person sy'n bwrw'r bleidlais yw'r person sydd â'r hawl i wneud hynny. Ond rwyf yn tybio pa un ai - . Rwy'n cytuno y rhoddir llawer o bleidleisiau mewn gwirionedd yn y bin gan na chafodd y ffurflen ei llenwi'n iawn. Tybed a oes modd ystyried anfon y bleidlais honno yn ôl at y person na lwyddodd i gwblhau'r dilysiad, gan egluro nad oedd y bleidlais yn ddilys, ac y byddai hynny o bosib yn eu galluogi i ystyried peidio â phleidleisio drwy'r post y tro nesaf. Rwy'n credu y dylid ceisio annog pobl ag anawsterau dysgu neu lythrennedd i beidio â phleidleisio drwy'r post oherwydd mae'n symlach o lawer iddynt fynd i orsaf bleidleisio. Y cyfan y mae'n rhaid iddyn nhw ei wneud yno yw dod o hyd i'r ymgeisydd y maen nhw eisiau pleidleisio drosto ar y rhestr. Ond rwyf yn credu bod eich cynigion ynglŷn â phleidleisio electronig a diwrnodau gwahanol ar gyfer pleidleisio yn golygu y gallwn sicrhau bod pobl sy'n cael anhawster mynd i fan arbennig, sydd ar agor am 15 awr - . Gallem gael gorsafoedd pleidleisio symudol, er enghraifft, mewn cartrefi gofal neu mewn archfarchnadoedd am gyfnodau byr iawn o amser, a fyddai'n galluogi pobl sy'n cael anhawster cerdded i'r orsaf bleidleisio - yn galluogi i'r orsaf bleidleisio ddod atyn nhw. Dyna beth fyddai systemau pleidleisio electronig yn ein galluogi ni i wneud. Pan feddyliwch sut yr ydym mewn gwirionedd yn gwella cywirdeb y gofrestr etholiadol, ni ddylem feddwl am fyfyrwyr ysgol yn unig, ond hefyd am y rheini sy'n darparu gofal cartref a allai gofrestru rhywun yn awtomatig sydd wedi diflannu oddi ar y gofrestr oherwydd eu salwch. Dylai fod yn ofynnol i gartrefi gofal cofrestredig a chartrefi nyrsio gofrestru pobl sy'n dod yn breswylwyr gyda nhw, a allai'n wir gael anawsterau wrth gofrestru'n electronig. Rwy'n hapus i weld -