English: That's an encouraging response, Minister. I just want to make it plain that this question is not raised as an attack on the growing film industry in Wales, despite comments from Welsh Government to that effect. I'm raising it in an attempt to break through the lack of transparency surrounding how some decisions were made and whether representations made by Welsh Government about the positive outcomes we should expect from Pinewood in particular are proving justified. So, first of all, last month, Welsh Government's decision log confirmed that Welsh Government had signed off a new management agreement for the Pinewood Studio facility in Wentloog. Considering that the Government spent £5 million to buy that facility in 2014, but, due to rent structure, it didn't see any rent return on that for the first two years, you can understand, perhaps, why I would like to know why that agreement needs restructuring. How much rent, and other income, are you expecting to be paid, and by when, from that restructured arrangement? Secondly, the productions of the studios - Journey's End, for example, has recouped just £80,000 of the £850,000 received from Welsh Government. And Take Down, or Billionaire Ransom, as it's rather ironically known in the US, has recovered less than a third of its £3.1 million investment. Now, I understand that the income-generation end of film production is at the end of its cycle, and I know that supply chains have benefited from these investments. But if Welsh Government is going to take risks - and we do approve of that - then the processes for managing those risks need to be open to scrutiny, partly so that we can find out when you're expecting returns, and how much, by a particular date, and also on potential conflicts of interest. Because the gatekeeper of the media investment budget is another branch of Pinewood - one of these films is a Pinewood production - and it, of course, has been filmed at Pinewood Studios. In keeping Pinewood committed to Wales, can you also commit that your department will answer my questions, which go to the heart of this lack of transparency, including the one that I've asked today? And then, finally, you announced very recently that Pinewood will no longer be the gatekeeper of the media investment board, which suggests that maybe their bonds with Wales aren't quite as strong as we might have hoped. Can you tell me whether that was at Welsh Government's request, or their request, and whether the decision was influenced in any way by questions raised in the House of Keys, in the Isle of Man, where there's a similar arrangement? You can see where my concerns are coming from. We've got three issues there, which kind of raise questions about Pinewood's commitment, and I'm really looking forward to some meat on the bone to the reassurance that you gave me a little earlier. Thank you.
Welsh: Mae hwnnw'n ymateb calonogol, Weinidog. Rwyf am ei gwneud yn glir nad yw'r cwestiwn hwn yn cael ei ofyn fel ymosodiad ar y diwydiant ffilm sy'n tyfu yng Nghymru, er gwaethaf sylwadau gan Lywodraeth Cymru i'r perwyl hwnnw. Rwy'n ei ofyn mewn ymgais i dorri drwy'r diffyg tryloywder ynglyn â sut y gwnaed rhai penderfyniadau ac a yw'r sylwadau a gyflwynwyd gan Lywodraeth Cymru am y canlyniadau cadarnhaol y dylem eu disgwyl gan Pinewood yn benodol yn rhai cyfiawn. Felly, yn gyntaf oll, y mis diwethaf, cadarnhaodd cofnod Llywodraeth Cymru o benderfyniadau fod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi llofnodi cytundeb rheoli newydd ar gyfer cyfleuster Pinewood Studios yng Ngwynllwg. O ystyried bod y Llywodraeth wedi gwario £5 miliwn ar brynu'r cyfleuster hwnnw yn 2014, ond nad oedd wedi cael unrhyw rent ohono am y ddwy flynedd gyntaf oherwydd y strwythur rhent, gallwch ddeall, efallai, pam yr hoffwn wybod pam y mae angen ailstrwythuro'r cytundeb hwnnw. Faint o rent, ac incwm arall, y disgwyliwch iddo gael ei dalu i chi, ac erbyn pryd, yn rhan o'r trefniant sydd wedi'i ailstrwythuro? Yn ail, cynyrchiadau'r stiwdios - £80,000 yn unig o'r £850,000 a gafodd gan Lywodraeth Cymru y mae Journey's End, er enghraifft, wedi ei adennill. Ac mae Take Down, neu Billionaire Ransom fel y'i gelwir yn yr Unol Daleithiau yn eironig braidd, wedi adennill llai na thraean o'i buddsoddiad £3.1 miliwn. Nawr, rwy'n deall bod y pen cynhyrchu incwm o gynhyrchu ffilmiau ar ddiwedd ei gylch, a gwn bod cadwyni cyflenwi wedi elwa o'r buddsoddiadau hyn. Ond os yw Llywodraeth Cymru yn mynd i gymryd risgiau - ac rydym yn cymeradwyo hynny - mae angen i'r prosesau ar gyfer rheoli'r risgiau hynny fod yn agored i graffu, yn rhannol er mwyn inni allu darganfod pryd rydych chi'n disgwyl gweld adenillion, a faint, erbyn dyddiad penodol, a hefyd o ran gwrthdaro buddiannau posibl. Am fod goruchwyliwr cyllideb fuddsoddi'r cyfryngau yn gangen arall o Pinewood - mae un o'r ffilmiau hyn yn gynhyrchiad Pinewood - ac wrth gwrs, mae wedi ei ffilmio yn Pinewood Studios. Drwy gadw Pinewood wedi ymrwymo i Gymru, a allwch hefyd ymrwymo y bydd eich adran yn ateb fy nghwestiynau sy'n mynd at wraidd y diffyg tryloywder hwn, gan gynnwys y cwestiwn a ofynnais heddiw? Ac yn olaf, cyhoeddasoch yn ddiweddar iawn na fydd Pinewood mwyach yn goruchwylio bwrdd buddsoddi'r cyfryngau, sy'n awgrymu efallai nad oedd y cysylltiad rhyngddynt â Chymru lawn mor gryf ag y gallem fod wedi gobeithio. A allwch ddweud wrthyf a oedd hynny ar gais Llywodraeth Cymru, neu ar eu cais hwy, ac a oedd y penderfyniad wedi ei ddylanwadu mewn unrhyw ffordd gan gwestiynau a godwyd yn yr House of Keys, ar Ynys Manaw, lle y ceir trefniant tebyg? Gallwch weld o ble y mae fy mhryderon yn tarddu. Mae gennym dri mater yma, sy'n rhyw lun o godi cwestiynau am ymrwymiad y Pinewood, ac rwy'n edrych ymlaen at weld rhywfaint o gig ar yr asgwrn o ran y sicrwydd a roesoch i mi ychydig yn gynharach. Diolch.