English: Well, I can assure the Member we will work with UK Government with regard to the growth deal. What is not clear at the moment is whether there is an element of that deal that would have been European funded, and this is at the heart of the dilemma that we face. If, for example, there is a gap in that funding, it has to be made up in some way, and, certainly, it has to be provided for that. With regard to the epilepsy strategy, of course we want to listen to the concerns of service users, and they will be taken fully into account as we have regard to that strategy over the years to come. With autism, it's right to say that it didn't work as part of the ALN Bill. We are looking at what legislation might be necessary in the future in order to strengthen the rights of service users, and that process is still ongoing. With regard to energy, it's not to do with the EU; it's to do with the UK's energy market and the opaque way in which it operates. Now, I've had discussions with Celsa and, again, they said to me last week that they operate on the basis where, in Germany, energy costs are 20 per cent lower; in Spain 37 per cent lower. Now, there's no rhyme or reason why that should be, but it's to do, I suspect, with the fact that, in the UK, the energy market is not as transparent as it is elsewhere in Europe. Now, I've said it many, many times; what I'd say is that we need to make sure that the voice of businesses in Wales is heard in Treasury because they are all saying the same thing. They find it hugely difficult to compete because of energy prices. Tata have said the same thing, and this is an issue that the UK Government and the UK itself cannot run away from. Do we want to have energy-intensive industries? If that is the case we've got to make sure that there is a competitive package available in terms of energy prices; and we're not at that point yet.
Welsh: Wel, gallaf sicrhau'r Aelod y byddwn yn gweithio gyda Llywodraeth y DU ar y fargen twf. Yr hyn nad yw'n glir ar hyn o bryd yw a oes elfen ar y fargen honno a fyddai wedi'i hariannu gan Ewrop, ac mae hyn wrth wraidd y broblem sy'n ein hwynebu. Os oes bwlch yn y cyllid hwnnw, er enghraifft, mae'n rhaid i rywun dalu amdano, ac, yn sicr, mae'n rhaid darparu ar gyfer hynny. O ran y strategaeth epilepsi, wrth gwrs ein bod ni am wrando ar bryderon defnyddwyr gwasanaethau, a byddwn yn eu hystyried yn llawn wrth inni ymwneud â'r strategaeth honno dros y blynyddoedd sydd i ddod. O ran awtistiaeth, mae'n deg dweud nad oedd yn gweithio fel rhan o'r Bil ADY. Rydym yn edrych ar ba ddeddfwriaeth y gallai fod ei hangen yn y dyfodol er mwyn cryfhau hawliau defnyddwyr gwasanaethau, ac mae'r broses honno'n parhau. O ran ynni, nid yw'n ymwneud â'r UE; mae'n ymwneud â marchnad ynni'r DU a'r ffordd annelwig y mae'n gweithredu. Nawr, rwyf wedi cael trafodaethau gyda Celsa ac, unwaith eto, maent wedi dweud wrthyf yr wythnos diwethaf eu bod yn gweithredu ar y sail lle mae costau ynni yn yr Almaen 20 y cant yn is; yn Sbaen maent 37 y cant yn is. Nawr, does dim rheol na rheswm am hynny, ond mae'n rhywbeth i'w wneud, rwy'n amau, â'r ffaith nad yw'r farchnad ynni, yn y DU, mor dryloyw ag y mae mewn mannau eraill yn Ewrop. Nawr, rwyf wedi ei ddweud lawer, lawer gwaith; yr hyn y byddwn i'n ei ddweud yw bod angen i ni wneud yn siŵr bod llais busnesau yng Nghymru'n cael ei glywed yn y Trysorlys, oherwydd maent i gyd yn dweud yr un peth. Maent yn ei chael hi'n hynod anodd cystadlu oherwydd prisiau ynni. Mae Tata wedi dweud yr un peth, ac mae hwn yn fater na all Llywodraeth y DU a'r DU ei hun ddianc oddi wrtho. A oes arnom eisiau diwydiannau ynni-ddwys yma? Os oes, mae'n rhaid i ni wneud yn siŵr bod pecyn cystadleuol ar gael o ran prisiau ynni; ac nid ydym wedi cyrraedd y pwynt hwnnw eto.