English: Cabinet Secretary, thank you for your statement today, and the speed with which you brought it forward. Our thoughts and prayers are, of course, with the victims and their families of the terrible fire that consumed the Grenfell Tower in west London last week. The images were truly horrific and will live with many people for the rest of their lives. We need to ensure that nothing similar happens anywhere in the UK again. I'm pleased that you've had discussions with social landlords. You said earlier that cladding of the type used on the Grenfell Tower and the cladding that increasingly seems to have been responsible for spreading the fire so quickly has not been fitted to buildings in Wales. I think you're right on that. However, we need to be absolutely clear that the cladding that has been used is as safe as it possibly can be. Are you confident, from your discussions - and I appreciate this is early days - that the other types of cladding that have been used are appropriate? And can I concur with David Melding's call for an audit of the materials that have been used? Because many materials might not have been as bad or as flammable as those used in the Grenfell Tower, but materials will have their flammability level. So, we need to be sure that, in any situation of fire and heat, those materials will be as safe as possible and not spread a fire in the same way that happened last week. Secondly, it wasn't just the materials themselves that were to blame. Again, it looks increasingly the case that it was the way that they were fitted to the building: on a framework, and with a gap between the material and the facade of the original building. In that situation, the gap that's created can result in a funnel effect - a chimney. It seems as though the fire actually spread up behind the cladding once it burnt through it, and then reached the upper levels of the building. So, it's not just the cladding; it's the way that it's attached as well. So, can you ensure that any audit looks at the way that cladding on Welsh buildings has been fitted? Can I finally call for a review? I think Bethan Jenkins - and other Members - called for a review of building regulations in Wales. I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with the regs that we've got, but I think this is a fast-moving situation and any lessons that can be learned from the tragedy last week, and changes that can be implemented here to ensure that doesn't happen again, will be welcome. As Lynne Neagle said, there is a need at the moment - and we do appreciate the fact that there are more sprinklers fitted in Welsh buildings than is the case with these types of buildings, certainly, in London and England - but there is a need to reassure people living in those flats, and with social landlords, that they are living in safety. Finally, we need to look at the guidance as well. I believe that, in the case last week, people were told to stay in their homes. That possibly wasn't the right advice. I know that we do have sprinklers here, which makes the situation different, but can you look at the guidance so that people can have absolute confidence that they are doing the right thing if and when these sorts of tragedies occur?
Welsh: Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, diolch i chi am eich datganiad heddiw, ac am ba mor gyflym y gwnaethoch chi ddod ag ef ymlaen. Mae ein meddyliau a'n gweddïau, wrth gwrs, gyda dioddefwyr y tân ofnadwy a losgodd Dŵr Grenfell yng ngorllewin Llundain yr wythnos diwethaf, a gyda'u teuluoedd. Roedd y delweddau yn wirioneddol erchyll a byddant gyda llawer o bobl am weddill eu bywydau. Mae angen i ni sicrhau nad oes unrhyw beth tebyg yn digwydd yn unrhyw le yn y DU eto. Rwy'n falch eich bod wedi cael trafodaethau gyda landlordiaid cymdeithasol. Fe wnaethoch chi ddweud yn gynharach nad yw cladin o'r math a ddefnyddiwyd ar Dŵr Grenfell a'r cladin sy'n dod yn gynyddol fwy tebygol iddo achosi i'r tân ledaenu mor gyflym wedi cael ei osod ar adeiladau yng Nghymru. Rwy'n meddwl eich bod yn iawn yn dweud hynny. Fodd bynnag, mae angen i ni fod yn gwbl glir fod y cladin sydd wedi ei ddefnyddio mor ddiogel ag y gall fod. Ydych chi'n hyderus, o'ch trafodaethau - ac rwy'n gwerthfawrogi ei bod hi'n ddyddiau cynnar - bod y mathau eraill o gladin a ddefnyddiwyd yn briodol? A gaf i ategu galwad David Melding am archwiliad o'r deunyddiau sydd wedi cael eu defnyddio? Oherwydd ni fyddai llawer o ddeunyddiau o bosib mor ddrwg neu mor fflamadwy â'r rheini sydd yn Nhŵr Grenfell, ond bydd gan ddeunyddiau eu lefel o fflamadwyedd. Felly, mae angen i ni fod yn sicr y bydd y deunyddiau hynny, mewn unrhyw sefyllfa o dân a gwres, mor ddiogel ag y bo modd ac na fyddant yn lledu tân yn yr un ffordd a ddigwyddodd yr wythnos diwethaf. Yn ail, nid dim ond y deunyddiau eu hunain a oedd ar fai. Unwaith eto, mae'n edrych yn gynyddol wir bod a wnelo hynny â'r ffordd y'u gosodwyd nhw ar yr adeilad: ar fframwaith, a chyda bwlch rhwng deunydd a ffasâd yr adeilad gwreiddiol. Yn y sefyllfa honno, gall y bwlch sydd wedi ei greu arwain at greu effaith twndis - simnai. Mae'n ymddangos fel bod y tân mewn gwirionedd wedi lledaenu i fyny y tu ôl i'r cladin ar ôl iddo losgi drwyddo, ac yna cyrraedd lefelau uchaf yr adeilad. Felly, mae o'n fwy na dim ond y cladin; mae o ynglŷn â'r ffordd mae'n cael ei osod hefyd. Felly, allwch chi sicrhau bod unrhyw archwiliad yn edrych ar y ffordd mae cladin wedi ei osod ar adeiladau yng Nghymru? A gaf i yn olaf alw am adolygiad? Rwy'n credu i Bethan Jenkins - ac Aelodau eraill - alw am adolygiad o'r rheoliadau adeiladu yng Nghymru. Nid dweud yr wyf i fod yna unrhyw beth o'i le ar y rheoliadau sydd gennym ni, ond rwy'n credu bod hon yn sefyllfa sy'n symud yn gyflym ac y byddwn yn croesawu unrhyw wersi y gellir eu dysgu o drasiedi yr wythnos diwethaf, a'r newidiadau y gellir eu gweithredu yma er mwyn sicrhau nad yw hynny'n digwydd eto. Fel y dywedodd Lynne Neagle, mae angen ar hyn o bryd - ac rydym yn gwerthfawrogi'r ffaith bod mwy o chwistrellwyr wedi eu gosod mewn adeiladau yng Nghymru nag sy'n wir am y math yma o adeiladau, yn sicr, yn Llundain ac yn Lloegr - ond mae angen rhoi sicrwydd i bobl sy'n byw yn y fflatiau hynny, a gyda landlordiaid cymdeithasol, eu bod yn byw mewn diogelwch. Yn olaf, mae angen i ni edrych ar y canllawiau hefyd. Credaf, yn achos yr wythnos diwethaf, y dywedwyd wrth bobl am aros yn eu cartrefi. Mae'n bosib nad hynny oedd y cyngor cywir. Fe wn i bod gennym ni systemau chwistrellu yma, sy'n gwneud y sefyllfa'n wahanol, ond allwch chi edrych ar y canllawiau fel y gall pobl fod yn gwbl hyderus eu bod yn gwneud y peth iawn os a phan fydd trasiedïau fel hyn yn digwydd?