English: Last week, I published a written statement arising from those discussions with Plaid Cymru, which sets out our intention to make provision for a consultation to take place to examine this proposal, and to bring forward changes to the regulations should it be established that such a scheme is both practical for farmers and protective of the environment on which they, as do all of us, rely. So, just to reassure Jane Dodds, I want to say that I can't pre-empt the consultation. It's a meaningful consultation, so no design has been worked up in the way that you are asking for some assurance, because it would be wrong to have a consultation that wasn't meaningful. Huw Irranca-Davies asked if there was going to be a fundamental rethink - absolutely not. This is just delaying one regulation whilst we look at a licensing scheme, and we will be working with Plaid Cymru to design that scheme and we will be going out to a full consultation. Paul Davies, again talking about the licensing scheme, you mentioned the need to ensure no further bureaucracy, and I go back to what I was saying to Jane Dodds, the consultation will be out there; it will be a 12-week consultation. Please, everybody, put your views forward, because, then, as we make the design of the scheme, obviously, we can ensure that there's less bureaucracy. It is not possible to accept the committee's recommendation in relation to recommendation 1 in the way it was formulated - a point I think I have explained in detail in my response to the committee's report. However, I do hope that committee will see that this does provide a way of responding positively in the spirit in which I know that the recommendation was intended. The Water Resources (Control of Agricultural Pollution) (Wales) Regulations - not nitrate vulnerable zones, Sam, you might want to continue discussing NVZs; clearly, you know the difference, I don't - are absolutely critical to delivering on our domestic and international legal obligations. And whilst the regulations focus on nitrates, the actions that they require are also a necessary means of addressing a range of other matters, all of which I know are extremely important to Members right across this Senedd. Dealing with agricultural pollution is an urgent and necessary priority to mitigate the impact of the climate emergency, because of the greenhouse gasses it contains, as well as the release of emissions as a result of the environmental damage that it causes, and it needs, as Jane Dodds referred to, a team Wales approach. Agricultural pollution is the predominant source of harmful ammonia pollution, which threatens the development of children's lungs and levels of cardiac disease, as well as the conservation of ancient woodlands. Quite a few Members raised the £20 million. James Evans mentioned it and clearly doesn't think that it's enough. And, as Llyr said, I don't think anybody would say that that would be the first amount of money that we've brought forward; we've brought significant funding forward. But let me just tell you: I don't have a pot of money where I can just find another £20 million, and it's just a pity that the UK Government put the bankers first, rather than our hard-working farmers. Joyce Watson looked for some assurance around farmers not being paid double, and I've always said that we could not give public money to ensure that farmers complied with the regulations that were already there, so I can assure you around that. Several Members mentioned the new technology, and Cefin Campbell and I went to Gelli Aur to see how that technology was coming forward, and the Welsh Government's been very happy to support that. I hadn't been for about three years, I think, and it was good to see the progress that was being made. But we are still seeing substantiated agricultural pollution incidents every month reaching double figures this year again, and we have to do something now. Agricultural pollution is also a significant source of phosphate pollution, which is currently preventing the development of housing and other key infrastructure that we know is urgently needed to improve the lives of every community in Wales. So, I very much welcome the opportunity in this debate to underline my commitment to action on climate, to clean air, to water quality and to halting and reversing the decline in biodiversity, and I know that farmers - the majority of them - share those things as well. And any decision I make will honour and advance those commitments, and these commitments, let me just remind everybody, are enshrined in law. They are simply a reflection of our moral responsibility to hand on Wales's natural heritage to the next generation in a better state than we found it. In discussing our environmental obligations, it is, unfortunately, necessary to highlight that the UK Conservative Government has signalled its intention to repeal all retained EU law, and that includes critical environmental protections. So, I believe that this is a deeply misguided policy that will cause, at best - [ Interruption.]. Yes.
Welsh: Yr wythnos diwethaf, cyhoeddais ddatganiad ysgrifenedig yn sgil y trafodaethau hynny gyda Phlaid Cymru, sy'n nodi ein bwriad i wneud darpariaeth i gynnal ymgynghoriad i archwilio'r cynnig hwn, ac i gyflwyno newidiadau i'r rheoliadau os tybir bod cynllun o'r fath yn ymarferol i ffermwyr ac yn diogelu'r amgylchedd y maent hwy, fel pob un ohonom, yn ddibynnol arno. Felly, i dawelu meddwl Jane Dodds, hoffwn ddweud na allaf achub y blaen ar yr ymgynghoriad. Mae'n ymgynghoriad ystyrlon, felly nid oes unrhyw gynllun wedi'i lunio yn y ffordd y gofynnwch i gael rhywfaint o sicrwydd, gan y byddai'n amhriodol cael ymgynghoriad nad oedd yn ystyrlon. Gofynnodd Huw Irranca-Davies a fydd yna ailfeddwl sylfaenol - ddim o gwbl. Dim ond gohirio un rheoliad yw hyn wrth inni edrych ar gynllun trwyddedu, a byddwn yn gweithio gyda Phlaid Cymru i lunio'r cynllun hwnnw, a byddwn yn cynnal ymgynghoriad llawn. Paul Davies, unwaith eto'n sôn am y cynllun trwyddedu, fe sonioch am yr angen i sicrhau na cheir rhagor o fiwrocratiaeth, ac af yn ôl at yr hyn a ddywedais wrth Jane Dodds, y bydd yr ymgynghoriad yn cael ei gynnal; bydd yn ymgynghoriad 12 wythnos. Os gwelwch yn dda, bawb, cyflwynwch eich safbwyntiau, oherwydd felly, wrth inni lunio'r cynllun, yn amlwg, gallwn sicrhau bod yna lai o fiwrocratiaeth. Nid yw'n bosibl derbyn argymhelliad y pwyllgor mewn perthynas ag argymhelliad 1 yn y ffordd y'i lluniwyd - pwynt y credaf fy mod wedi'i egluro'n fanwl yn fy ymateb i adroddiad y pwyllgor. Fodd bynnag, rwy'n gobeithio y bydd y pwyllgor yn gweld bod hyn yn cynnig ffordd o ymateb yn gadarnhaol yn yr ysbryd y gwn y bwriadwyd yr argymhelliad. Mae Rheoliadau Adnoddau Dŵr (Rheoli Llygredd Amaethyddol) (Cymru) - nid parthau perygl nitradau, Sam, efallai eich bod chi am barhau i drafod parthau perygl nitradau; yn amlwg, rydych yn gwybod beth yw'r gwahaniaeth, nid wyf fi - yn gwbl hanfodol er mwyn cyflawni ein rhwymedigaethau cyfreithiol domestig a rhyngwladol. Ac er bod y rheoliadau'n canolbwyntio ar nitradau, mae'r camau gweithredu sy'n ofynnol ar eu cyfer hefyd yn fodd angenrheidiol o fynd i'r afael ag amrywiaeth o faterion eraill, a gwn eu bod oll yn hynod bwysig i'r Aelodau ar draws y Senedd. Mae ymdrin â llygredd amaethyddol yn flaenoriaeth bwysig ac angenrheidiol i liniaru effaith yr argyfwng hinsawdd, oherwydd y nwyon tŷ gwydr y mae'n eu cynnwys, yn ogystal â'r allyriadau sy'n cael eu rhyddhau o ganlyniad i'r niwed amgylcheddol y mae'n ei achosi, ac fel y nododd Jane Dodds, mae angen dull gweithredu tîm Cymru er mwyn i hyn weithio. Llygredd amaethyddol yw prif ffynhonnell llygredd amonia niweidiol, sy'n gallu amharu ar ddatblygiad ysgyfaint plant a lefelau clefyd y galon, yn ogystal â chadwraeth coetiroedd hynafol. Cododd cryn dipyn o Aelodau'r £20 miliwn. Soniodd James Evans am y peth, ac yn amlwg, nid yw'n credu ei fod yn ddigon. Ac fel y dywedodd Llyr, ni chredaf y byddai unrhyw un yn dweud mai dyna fyddai'r swm cyntaf o arian yr ydym wedi'i ddarparu; rydym wedi darparu cyllid sylweddol. Ond gadewch imi ddweud wrthych: nid oes gennyf bot o arian lle gallaf ddod o hyd i £20 miliwn arall, ac mae'n drueni fod Llywodraeth y DU wedi rhoi'r bancwyr yn gyntaf, yn hytrach na'n ffermwyr gweithgar. Gofynnodd Joyce Watson am rywfaint o sicrwydd ynghylch peidio â thalu ffermwyr ddwywaith, ac rwyf bob amser wedi dweud na allem roi arian cyhoeddus i sicrhau bod ffermwyr yn cydymffurfio â'r rheoliadau a oedd eisoes ar waith, felly gallaf roi sicrwydd i chi ynglŷn â hynny. Soniodd sawl Aelod am y dechnoleg newydd, ac aeth Cefin Campbell a minnau i Gelli Aur i weld sut yr oedd y dechnoleg honno'n dod yn ei blaen, ac mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi bod yn falch iawn o gefnogi hynny. Nid oeddwn wedi bod yno ers rhyw dair blynedd, rwy'n credu, ac roedd yn dda gweld y cynnydd a oedd yn cael ei wneud. Ond rydym yn dal i weld achosion o lygredd amaethyddol a gadarnheir bob mis yn cyrraedd ffigurau dwbl eto eleni, ac mae'n rhaid inni wneud rhywbeth yn awr. Mae llygredd amaethyddol hefyd yn ffynhonnell sylweddol o lygredd ffosffad, sydd ar hyn o bryd yn atal gwaith datblygu tai a seilwaith allweddol arall y gwyddom fod ei angen ar frys i wella bywydau pob cymuned yng Nghymru. Felly, rwy'n croesawu'r cyfle yn y ddadl hon i danlinellu fy ymrwymiad i gamau gweithredu ar yr hinsawdd, i aer glân, i ansawdd dŵr ac i atal a gwrthdroi'r dirywiad mewn bioamrywiaeth, a gwn fod ffermwyr - y rhan fwyaf ohonynt - yn rhannu'r pethau hynny hefyd. A bydd unrhyw benderfyniad a wnaf yn anrhydeddu ac yn datblygu'r ymrwymiadau hynny, a gadewch imi atgoffa pawb, mae'r ymrwymiadau hyn wedi'u hymgorffori yn y gyfraith. Maent yn adlewyrchiad o'n cyfrifoldeb moesol i drosglwyddo treftadaeth naturiol Cymru i'r genhedlaeth nesaf mewn gwell cyflwr nag y'i cawsom. Wrth drafod ein rhwymedigaethau amgylcheddol, yn anffodus, mae angen tynnu sylw at y ffaith bod Llywodraeth Geidwadol y DU wedi nodi ei bwriad i ddiddymu holl gyfreithiau'r UE a ddargedwir, ac mae hynny'n cynnwys mesurau diogelu amgylcheddol hanfodol. Felly, credaf fod hwn yn bolisi hynod annoeth a fydd yn achosi, ar y gorau - [ Torri ar draws.]. Iawn.