English: I'm grateful to the Minister for her statement opening this debate. I noticed that the Minister seems to be making a great deal of notes during this debate. She's always welcome, of course, whenever we're debating these things, but I'm sure she's been as shocked as I am during this debate that, having spent 10 years listening to Tories lecture us on austerity, lecture us on being very careful with the public purse and the rest of it, we've just had a number of Tory speakers standing up and spending a million quid with every breath they take. We've had Gareth Davies demanding more money for investing in social services. I tend to agree with him, as it happens, but it's his Government that's been cutting it in the first place, of course. Janet Finch-Saunders bemoans the lack of investment in climate change when she has a Government that barely believes in it in Westminster and has certainly cut back on investment on the other side of the border. And poor old Peter Fox, of course, wants to spend money on everything, just in case. So we have had a Conservative debate this afternoon that has been entirely rooted in spending public money that they themselves are involved in cutting. There is a word for that. I won't test your patience, Deputy Presiding Officer, this afternoon, but there is a word for that, and it was used quite freely in Westminster at lunchtime. Let me say this: I think in terms of the debates that we have on our budgets in Wales, we need to focus more on income than on expenditure. Anybody can spend money. Anybody can stand up and demand more funding for every subject under the sun. I welcome the conversations that the Government has had with Plaid Cymru and with the Liberal Democrats. I see the influence of both those parties on this budget, and I think it's something to be welcomed. I also notice that the contributions from Jane Dodds and from Plaid Cymru Members this afternoon have been far more rooted in reality and rooted in delivery than the fantasies we've heard from Conservative Members. But let me say this in terms of not spending, but raising funds: I'd like to understand more from the Minister how she is looking at her budgets over the coming years. Because it's fake, of course, for the Conservatives to argue that this is the most generous spending agreement or settlement that we've ever had. It's the easiest thing in the world to look at the cash numbers and say this is more than last year, and that's more than the year before. That's basic arithmetic. It's not the reality, though, and it's not the reality that we've had over the last decade. I remember Peter Fox very well as a local government leader; I don't remember him once telling me that he would prefer to be an English local government leader than a Welsh local government leader when he was dancing a very neat little dance around the words of Andrew R.T. Davies in the Chamber being thrown back at him in other meetings. But I don't blame him for that either. But let me say this: Brexit is having a ferocious impact on our public finances. It's already been mentioned, and Rhianon Passmore spoke about the utter betrayal of Welsh communities; £375 million the Secretary of State promised would be maintained at a Finance Committee last year - he made that commitment on the record to Members here, and Members will remember that. It was to the External Affairs and Additional Legislation Committee, actually; I think the Deputy Presiding Officer was in the Chair during that meeting. We've received £46 million. Either he was seeking to mislead us at the time, or he's misled us since then. Since we've now got a Prime Minister who misleads people every minute of every day, we don't know the answer to that question, but what we do know is that we've been misled, that people up and down Wales have been deeply misled, and that public finances are much the worse for that. But we also know that Brexit is reducing our gross domestic product by an average of 4 per cent. That's going to have a direct impact, of course, on our tax take and the ability of the Welsh Government to meet its commitments in terms of taxation, and I'd like to understand how the Minister is seeking to address that. I also want to raise the issue of rail investment. We've seen again the Tories not investing in Wales. Peter Fox finished his opening contribution by saying that this budget recognises the place of Wales in a strong union. What it actually does is recognise the weakness of Wales in a union that doesn't give a damn about Wales. That's what it really does. If you look at the - . Well, Janet can shake her head, but the numbers speak for themselves. We are not seeing the investment in rail infrastructure that we are seeing in Scotland. We are not seeing the infrastructure investments in Wales that we're seeing across the border in England, and why is that? It's because a Tory Government in Westminster doesn't want to spend the money in Wales. Simple as that. I'm happy to take an intervention if any of those Members wish to do so.
Welsh: Rwy'n ddiolchgar i'r Gweinidog am ei datganiad wrth agor y ddadl hon. Sylwais i ei bod yn ymddangos bod y Gweinidog yn gwneud llawer iawn o nodiadau yn ystod y ddadl hon. Mae croeso iddi bob tro, wrth gwrs, pryd bynnag yr ydym ni'n trafod y pethau hyn, ond rwy'n siŵr ei bod hi wedi cael cymaint o sioc ag yr wyf i yn ystod y ddadl hon, ar ôl treulio 10 mlynedd yn gwrando ar y Torïaid yn ein darlithio ni ar gyni, yn ein darlithio ar fod yn ofalus iawn gyda'r pwrs cyhoeddus ac ati, rydym ni newydd gael nifer o siaradwyr Torïaidd yn sefyll i fyny ac yn gwario miliwn o bunnau gyda phob anadl y maen nhw'n ei gymryd. Rydym ni wedi cael Gareth Davies yn mynnu mwy o arian ar gyfer buddsoddi mewn gwasanaethau cymdeithasol. Rwyf i'n dueddol o gytuno ag ef, fel y mae'n digwydd, ond ei Lywodraeth ef sydd wedi bod yn ei dorri yn y lle cyntaf, wrth gwrs. Mae Janet Finch-Saunders yn cwyno am y diffyg buddsoddiad mewn newid hinsawdd pan fo ganddi Lywodraeth sydd prin yn credu ynddo yn San Steffan ac yn sicr wedi cwtogi ar fuddsoddiad ar ochr arall y ffin. Ac mae'r hen Peter Fox druan, wrth gwrs, eisiau gwario arian ar bopeth, rhag ofn. Felly, rydym ni wedi cael dadl Geidwadol y prynhawn yma sydd wedi'i gwreiddio'n llwyr mewn gwario arian cyhoeddus y maen nhw eu hunain yn rhan o'r broses o'i dorri. Mae gair am hynny. Nid wyf am drethu eich amynedd, Dirprwy Lywydd, y prynhawn yma, ond mae gair am hynny, ac fe gafodd ei ddefnyddio'n eithaf rhydd yn San Steffan amser cinio. Gadewch i mi ddweud hyn: rwy'n credu o ran y dadleuon sydd gennym ni ar ein cyllidebau yng Nghymru, mae angen i ni ganolbwyntio mwy ar incwm nag ar wariant. Gall unrhyw un wario arian. Gall unrhyw un sefyll i fyny a mynnu mwy o arian ar gyfer pob pwnc dan haul. Rwy'n croesawu'r sgyrsiau y mae'r Llywodraeth wedi'u cael gyda Phlaid Cymru a gyda'r Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol. Rwy'n gweld dylanwad y ddwy blaid hynny ar y gyllideb hon, ac rwy'n credu ei fod yn rhywbeth i'w groesawu. Rwy'n sylwi hefyd fod cyfraniadau Jane Dodds a gan Aelodau Plaid Cymru y prynhawn yma wedi'u gwreiddio'n llawer mwy mewn gwirionedd ac wedi'u gwreiddio mewn cyflawni na'r ffantasïau yr ydym ni wedi'u clywed gan Aelodau Ceidwadol. Ond gadewch i mi ddweud hyn o ran peidio â gwario, ond codi arian: hoffwn i ddeall mwy gan y Gweinidog o ran sut y mae hi'n edrych ar ei chyllidebau yn ystod y blynyddoedd nesaf. Gan ei bod hi'n ffug, wrth gwrs, i'r Ceidwadwyr ddadlau mai dyma'r cytundeb neu setliad gwario mwyaf hael i ni ei gael erioed. Y peth hawsaf yn y byd yw edrych ar niferoedd yr arian parod a dweud bod hyn yn fwy na'r llynedd, a bod hynny'n fwy na'r flwyddyn flaenorol. Mae hynny'n rhifyddeg sylfaenol. Nid dyma'r gwir sefyllfa, serch hynny, ac nid dyma'r sefyllfa yr ydym wedi'i chael yn ystod y degawd diwethaf. Rwy'n cofio Peter Fox yn dda iawn yn arweinydd llywodraeth leol; nid wyf yn ei gofio yn dweud wrthyf unwaith y byddai'n well ganddo fod yn arweinydd llywodraeth leol yn Lloegr nag arweinydd llywodraeth leol yng Nghymru pan oedd yn dawnsio dawns fach grefftus iawn o amgylch geiriau Andrew R.T. Davies yn y Siambr a oedd yn cael eu taflu'n ôl ato mewn cyfarfodydd eraill. Ond nid wyf i'n ei feio am hynny chwaith. Ond gadewch i mi ddweud hyn: mae Brexit yn cael effaith ffyrnig ar ein cyllid cyhoeddus. Mae eisoes wedi'i grybwyll, a siaradodd Rhianon Passmore am fradychu cymunedau Cymru yn llwyr; byddai'r £375 miliwn a addawodd yr Ysgrifennydd Gwladol yn cael ei gynnal mewn Pwyllgor Cyllid y llynedd - gwnaeth ef yr ymrwymiad hwnnw ar y cofnod i'r Aelodau yma, a bydd yr Aelodau'n cofio hynny. I'r Pwyllgor Materion Allanol a Deddfwriaeth Ychwanegol ydoedd, mewn gwirionedd; rwy'n credu mai'r Dirprwy Lywydd oedd yn y Gadair yn ystod y cyfarfod hwnnw. Rydym ni wedi cael £46 miliwn. Naill ai yr oedd e'n ceisio ein camarwain ni ar y pryd, neu y mae wedi'n camarwain ni ers hynny. Gan fod gennym ni nawr Brif Weinidog y DU sy'n camarwain pobl bob munud o bob dydd, nid ydym ni'n gwybod yr ateb i'r cwestiwn hwnnw, ond yr hyn yr ydym ni yn ei wybod yw ein bod ni wedi cael ein camarwain, a bod pobl ar hyd a lled Cymru wedi cael eu camarwain yn fawr, a bod cyllid cyhoeddus yn waeth o lawer o'r herwydd. Ond rydym ni hefyd yn gwybod bod Brexit yn lleihau ein cynnyrch domestig gros 4 y cant ar gyfartaledd. Mae hynny'n mynd i gael effaith uniongyrchol, wrth gwrs, ar ein defnydd o drethi a gallu Llywodraeth Cymru i gyflawni ei hymrwymiadau o ran trethiant, a hoffwn i ddeall sut y mae'r Gweinidog yn ceisio ymdrin â hynny. Rwyf i hefyd eisiau codi mater buddsoddi mewn rheilffyrdd. Rydym ni wedi gweld eto nad yw'r Torïaid yn buddsoddi yng Nghymru. Gorffennodd Peter Fox ei gyfraniad agoriadol drwy ddweud bod y gyllideb hon yn cydnabod lle Cymru mewn undeb cryf. Yr hyn y mae'n ei wneud mewn gwirionedd yw cydnabod gwendid Cymru mewn undeb nad oes ots ganddo am Gymru. Dyna mae'n ei wneud mewn gwirionedd. Os edrychwch ar - . Wel, gall Janet ysgwyd ei phen, ond mae'r rhifau'n siarad drostyn nhw eu hunain. Nid ydym ni'n gweld y buddsoddiad mewn seilwaith rheilffyrdd yr ydym ni'n ei weld yn yr Alban. Nid ydym ni'n gweld y buddsoddiadau seilwaith yng Nghymru yr ydym ni'n eu gweld dros y ffin yn Lloegr, a pham hynny? Y rheswm am hynny yw nad yw Llywodraeth Dorïaidd yn San Steffan eisiau gwario'r arian yng Nghymru. Mor syml â hynny. Rwy'n hapus i dderbyn ymyriad os bydd unrhyw un o'r Aelodau hynny'n dymuno gwneud hynny.