techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I was disappointed with the beginning of that answer, I have to say, Trefnydd. With so many bank closures, we are relying on post offices for access to cash now. Can you clarify whether the post office charges banks for the service that people can use there, or, possibly, is the charge the other way round? Does the post office charge the bank or does the bank charge the post office? And is there any difference in those charges depending on where those post offices are located? As we've heard recently, a differential is now being considered for the Link ATM network with more deprived and rural areas incurring smaller charges between the two organisations than, perhaps, city centres. But that could be a disincentive or an incentive for post offices, depending where they are. Obviously, I accept that Welsh Government has limited powers in this field, but in deciding which post offices you could support through your financial inclusion policies, how do you horizon scan for new threats to access to cash in deciding which post offices you could support?
Welsh: Roeddwn yn siomedig gyda dechrau'r ateb hwnnw, mae'n rhaid imi ddweud, Drefnydd. Gyda chymaint o fanciau'n cau, rydym yn dibynnu ar swyddfeydd post bellach i gael mynediad at arian parod. A allwch egluro pa un a yw swyddfeydd post yn codi tâl ar fanciau am y gwasanaeth y gall pobl ei ddefnyddio yno, neu o bosibl, a godir tâl y ffordd arall? Ai'r swyddfeydd post sy'n codi tâl ar y banc neu ai'r banc sy'n codi tâl ar y swyddfeydd post? Ac a oes unrhyw wahaniaeth yn y costau hynny yn dibynnu ar ble y lleolir y swyddfeydd post hynny? Fel y clywsom yn ddiweddar, mae cyfradd wahaniaethol dan ystyriaeth bellach ar gyfer rhwydwaith peiriannau ATM Link, gydag ardaloedd mwy difreintiedig a gwledig yn gweld taliadau llai rhwng y ddau sefydliad na chanol dinasoedd o bosibl. Ond gallai hynny fod yn anghymhelliad neu'n gymhelliad i swyddfeydd post, yn dibynnu ar ble y maent. Yn amlwg, rwy'n derbyn mai pwerau cyfyngedig sydd gan Lywodraeth Cymru yn y maes hwn, ond wrth bennu pa swyddfeydd post y gallech eu cefnogi drwy eich polisïau cynhwysiant ariannol, sut rydych yn sganio'r gorwel am fygythiadau newydd i fynediad at arian parod wrth benderfynu pa swyddfeydd post y gallech eu cefnogi?
English: Thank you very much for raising that. Of course, bank regulation and the post office network are both responsibilities of the UK Government and we've been very clear time and time again that the UK Government does need to take a more coherent and strategic approach to community banking. We believe that all banks, when they leave a community, do have a responsibility to the customers who have often been giving their loyalty to that bank for decades, in many cases. We know that, actually, six banks in total, that we're aware of, are due to close later this year, including the one previously mentioned in Tonypandy, which is one of the reasons that we're interested in exploring the idea of a community bank for Wales. So, we're in some very early-stage discussions with a number of stakeholders who are keen to explore with us the feasibility of establishing that community bank in Wales. That work will be led by partners who will prepare a full market assessment and business plan with the intention to submitting it then to the Bank of England as an application later on this year. Banking professionals working within the Development Bank of Wales will support the work, providing advice and guidance where appropriate and ensuring that the creation of a community bank does integrate with the existing financial institutions, including, for example, the Development Bank for Wales and the credit unions. The credit unions particularly are a really important part of that financial inclusion that the Member was talking about.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn am godi hynny. Wrth gwrs, mae rheoleiddio banciau a rhwydwaith y swyddfeydd post yn gyfrifoldebau i Lywodraeth y DU, ac rydym wedi dweud yn glir iawn dro ar ôl tro fod angen i Lywodraeth y DU fabwysiadu ymagwedd fwy cydlynol a strategol tuag at fancio cymunedol. Rydym yn credu bod gan bob banc, pan fyddant yn gadael cymuned, gyfrifoldeb i'r cwsmeriaid sy'n aml wedi bod yn deyrngar i'r banc hwnnw ers degawdau, mewn llawer o achosion. Gwyddom y bydd chwe banc rydym yn ymwybodol ohonynt yn cau yn ddiweddarach eleni, gan gynnwys yr un a grybwyllwyd eisoes yn Nhonypandy, a dyna un o'r rhesymau pam fod gennym ddiddordeb mewn archwilio'r syniad o fanc cymunedol i Gymru. Felly, rydym wedi cynnal rhai trafodaethau cychwynnol gyda nifer o randdeiliaid sy'n awyddus i archwilio dichonoldeb sefydlu'r banc cymunedol hwnnw yng Nghymru. Bydd y gwaith hwnnw'n cael ei arwain gan bartneriaid a fydd yn paratoi asesiad llawn o'r farchnad a chynllun busnes gyda'r bwriad o'i gyflwyno wedyn i Fanc Lloegr fel cais yn ddiweddarach eleni. Bydd gweithwyr bancio proffesiynol sy'n gweithio ym Manc Datblygu Cymru yn cefnogi'r gwaith, gan ddarparu cyngor a chyfarwyddyd lle bo'n briodol a sicrhau bod y broses o greu banc cymunedol yn integreiddio â sefydliadau ariannol sy'n bodoli eisoes, gan gynnwys, er enghraifft, Banc Datblygu Cymru a'r undebau credyd. Mae'r undebau credyd yn arbennig yn rhan bwysig iawn o'r cynhwysiant ariannol hwnnw yr oedd yr Aelod yn sôn amdano.
English: Welsh tax policy will be developed in line with the principles set out in our tax policy framework. I will be taking a considered approach, seeking to raise revenue fairly, and engaging widely with taxpayers and other stakeholders.
Welsh: Bydd polisi treth Cymru yn cael ei ddatblygu yn unol â'r egwyddorion a amlinellir yn ein fframwaith polisi trethi. Byddaf yn mabwysiadu ymagwedd ystyriol, yn ceisio codi refeniw'n deg, ac yn ymgysylltu'n eang â threthdalwyr a rhanddeiliaid eraill.
English: Minister, taxation powers offer the opportunity to introduce change to the tax system to help create a fairer and more equal Wales. At the moment, private schools sustain an institutionalised unfairness and inequality, working against social mobility by entrenching educational inequality that feeds through to careers and life chances, with ex-private school pupils disproportionately featuring at the top of professions and businesses. Will you carefully consider ending the tax advantages of charitable status for private schools to further equality of opportunity and outcome in Wales?
Welsh: Weinidog, mae pwerau trethu yn rhoi cyfle i gyflwyno newid i'r system drethi er mwyn helpu i greu Cymru decach a mwy cyfartal. Ar hyn o bryd, mae ysgolion preifat yn cynnal annhegwch ac anghydraddoldeb sefydliadol, ac yn gweithio yn erbyn symudedd cymdeithasol drwy atgyfnerthu anghydraddoldeb addysgol sy'n bwydo drwodd i yrfaoedd a chyfleoedd bywyd, gyda nifer anghymesur o gyn-ddisgyblion ysgolion preifat yn cyrraedd y brig mewn nifer o broffesiynau a busnesau. A wnewch chi roi ystyriaeth ofalus i roi diwedd ar y manteision treth a ddaw yn sgil statws elusennol ysgolion preifat er mwyn hyrwyddo cydraddoldeb o ran cyfleoedd a chanlyniadau yng Nghymru?
English: Thank you very much for that question. Of course, fairness is our No. 1 principle in the tax principles that are guiding us in terms of the development of our tax policy in Wales. I can confirm that I do intend to consult over the next 12 months on proposals to place independent schools and private hospitals on an equal footing with their public sector counterparts in respect of the payment of non-domestic rates. The consultation will consider removing charitable rate relief from private schools and private hospitals where they're registered as charities. State schools and hospitals, of course, are obliged to pay non-domestic rates, as are all other ratepayers, and this is an important contribution to the cost of the vital local services that are delivered in our communities. So, this brings in the question of equality, which you've mentioned, alongside fairness - if we do change the eligibility of these institutions as a result of the consultation, it will put them on an equal footing with the state schools and hospitals.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn am eich cwestiwn. Wrth gwrs, tegwch yw ein hegwyddor bwysicaf o ran yr egwyddorion trethu sy'n ein llywio wrth inni ddatblygu ein polisi treth yng Nghymru. Gallaf gadarnhau fy mod yn bwriadu ymgynghori dros y 12 mis nesaf ar gynigion i sicrhau bod ysgolion annibynnol ac ysbytai preifat ar sail gyfartal â'u cymheiriaid yn y sector cyhoeddus mewn perthynas â thalu ardrethi annomestig. Bydd yr ymgynghoriad yn ystyried diddymu rhyddhad ardrethi elusennol oddi ar ysgolion preifat ac ysbytai preifat os ydynt wedi'u cofrestru fel elusennau. Mae'n rhaid i ysgolion ac ysbytai gwladol, wrth gwrs, dalu ardrethi annomestig, fel pob talwr ardrethi arall, ac mae'n gyfraniad pwysig at gost y gwasanaethau lleol hanfodol a ddarperir yn ein cymunedau. Felly, mae hyn yn arwain at y cwestiwn ynghylch cydraddoldeb, a grybwyllwyd gennych, ochr yn ochr â thegwch - os byddwn yn newid cymhwystra'r sefydliadau hyn o ganlyniad i'r ymgynghoriad, bydd hynny'n eu rhoi ar sail gyfartal ag ysgolion ac ysbytai gwladol.
English: Would you agree, Minister, that Welsh Government policy with regard to Welsh rates of income tax must include a commitment to providing comprehensive and accessible guidance to Welsh taxpayers, and can you confirm that guidance will be provided by websites such as those of Welsh Government and the Welsh Revenue Authority? And my other point is, Minister: if people living in south-east Wales work the other side of the border - we know one person in this Chamber lives in England and is here in this part of the world - so if there's a tax difference between the two regions, the two countries, where's the benefit for the tax? Can he or she claim and go for the place of residence rather than where they earn the money?
Welsh: A fyddech yn cytuno, Weinidog, fod yn rhaid i bolisi Llywodraeth Cymru o ran cyfraddau treth incwm Cymru gynnwys ymrwymiad i ddarparu canllawiau cynhwysfawr a hygyrch i drethdalwyr Cymru, ac a allwch gadarnhau y bydd canllawiau'n cael eu darparu ar wefannau megis rhai Llywodraeth Cymru ac Awdurdod Cyllid Cymru? A fy mhwynt arall, Weinidog: os yw pobl sy'n byw yn ne-ddwyrain Cymru yn gweithio dros y ffin - gwyddom fod un unigolyn yn y Siambr hon yn byw yn Lloegr ac maent yma yn y rhan hon o'r byd - felly os oes gwahaniaeth mewn trethi rhwng y ddau ranbarth, y ddwy wlad, lle mae'r budd ar gyfer y dreth? A fydd modd iddo ef neu hi wneud cais a mynd am eu man preswylio yn hytrach na lle maent yn ennill yr arian?
English: I can confirm that most people will be paying tax in their place of residence. However, there is an exception within the rules that means that all Assembly Members will be paying the Welsh rates of income tax regardless of where they live. I will confirm that there will be a comprehensive communications programme to ensure that people are well aware of Welsh rates of income tax and what it might mean for them, and obviously to be able to have any questions that they have answered.
Welsh: Gallaf gadarnhau y bydd y rhan fwyaf o bobl yn talu trethi yn eu man preswylio. Fodd bynnag, mae eithriad yn y rheolau sy'n golygu y bydd holl Aelodau'r Cynulliad yn talu cyfraddau treth incwm Cymru ni waeth ble maent yn byw. Byddaf yn cadarnhau y bydd rhaglen gyfathrebiadau gynhwysfawr ar waith i sicrhau bod pobl yn gwbl ymwybodol o gyfraddau treth incwm Cymru a beth y gallai hynny ei olygu iddynt hwy, ac yn amlwg, i allu cael atebion i unrhyw gwestiynau sydd ganddynt.
English: Together with my officials, I am in regular contact with UK Treasury Ministers about a range of financial issues, including discussing the implications of the current position regarding the impact of Brexit on public spending and our budget.
Welsh: Gyda fy swyddogion, rwyf mewn cysylltiad rheolaidd â Gweinidogion Trysorlys y DU mewn perthynas ag amrywiaeth o faterion ariannol, gan gynnwys trafod goblygiadau'r sefyllfa bresennol o ran effaith Brexit ar wariant cyhoeddus a'n cyllideb.
English: Thank you for that answer, Minister. Obviously, many of us have often mentioned the shared prosperity fund, because we don't know what it is and where it comes from, but that focuses on European structural funds and regional development fund money. The question I have is: are there other funds in Europe that are coming to institutions in this country? I'll give an example - it was raised with the cross-party group on steel last week - the research fund for coal and steel, which actually funds research into steel areas to ensure that we have a sustainable steel industry for the future, something critical to the Welsh economy. When they raised this question with the Treasury, they were basically told, 'It will go back into the pot', and it will not be ring-fenced for anything, so we may not get a ring-fenced research fund for steel and coal. When you meet the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, can you please raise the issue of any funds that come back from Europe, or that would have been allocated to Europe for particular topics in particular areas - remain in those so that we can benefit from that? Because the loss of something like £200 million to £400 million of accessible funding for research into steel is a huge loss to this country.
Welsh: Diolch am eich ateb, Weinidog. Yn amlwg, mae llawer ohonom wedi sôn lawer gwaith am y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin, gan na wyddom beth ydyw nac o ble y daw, ond mae'r gronfa honno'n canolbwyntio ar gronfeydd strwythurol Ewropeaidd ac arian y gronfa datblygu rhanbarthol. Y cwestiwn sydd gennyf yw hwn: a oes cronfeydd eraill yn Ewrop sy'n dod i sefydliadau yn y wlad hon? Rhoddaf enghraifft - codwyd hyn gyda'r grŵp trawsbleidiol ar ddur yr wythnos diwethaf - y gronfa ymchwil ar gyfer glo a dur, sydd mewn gwirionedd yn ariannu ymchwil ar ardaloedd dur i sicrhau bod gennym ddiwydiant dur cynaliadwy ar gyfer y dyfodol, rhywbeth sy'n hanfodol i economi Cymru. Pan ofynasant y cwestiwn hwn i'r Trysorlys, dywedwyd wrthynt, yn y bôn, 'Bydd yn mynd yn ôl i'r pot', ac na fyddai'n cael ei glustnodi ar gyfer unrhyw beth, felly efallai na chawn gronfa ymchwil wedi'i chlustnodi ar gyfer dur a glo. Pan fyddwch yn cyfarfod â Phrif Ysgrifennydd y Trysorlys, a allwch godi'r mater fod unrhyw arian a ddaw yn ôl o Ewrop, neu a fyddai wedi'i ddyrannu i Ewrop ar gyfer pynciau penodol mewn ardaloedd penodol, yn parhau i fod yno iddynt fel y gallwn elwa o hynny? Oherwydd mae colli oddeutu £200 miliwn i £400 miliwn o gyllid hygyrch ar gyfer ymchwilio i ddur yn golled enfawr i'r wlad hon.
English: Absolutely, and the Member is well aware that we were promised that Wales wouldn't be a single penny worse off as a result of Brexit, and it is absolutely imperative that we hold the UK Government to that commitment. David Rees is right: there's a huge amount of focus on the shared prosperity fund because of the importance of it to our communities, and the investment that it makes, but there are so many other programmes and funds that we do benefit from - so, the steel research programme, which has been referred to, is one of them, but also a number of smaller programmes. And we really do need to ensure that we continue to have access to a wide range of programmes, a wide range of networks, and the wide range of innovation funds that we have at the moment. I will certainly be pressing that case, as I know my colleague the Brexit Minister will be in the meetings that he attends very regularly, and the First Minister's very regular, now, meetings with the Prime Minister.
Welsh: Yn sicr, ac mae'r Aelod yn ymwybodol iawn ein bod wedi cael addewid na fyddai Cymru'n colli'r un geiniog yn sgil Brexit, ac mae'n gwbl hanfodol ein bod yn dal Llywodraeth y DU at yr ymrwymiad hwnnw. Mae David Rees yn iawn: ceir cryn dipyn o ffocws ar y gronfa ffyniant gyffredin oherwydd ei phwysigrwydd i'n cymunedau, a'r buddsoddiad a wna, ond rydym yn elwa o gymaint o raglenni a chronfeydd eraill - felly, mae'r rhaglen ymchwil i ddur, a grybwyllwyd, yn un ohonynt, ond nifer o raglenni llai yn ogystal. Ac mae gwir angen inni sicrhau ein bod yn parhau i gael mynediad at amrywiaeth eang o raglenni, amrywiaeth eang o rwydweithiau, a'r ystod eang o gronfeydd arloesi sydd gennym ar hyn o bryd. Byddaf yn sicr yn pwysleisio hynny, fel y gwn y bydd fy nghyd-Aelod, y Gweinidog Brexit, yn y cyfarfodydd y mae'n eu mynychu'n rheolaidd iawn, a chyfarfodydd rheolaidd iawn, bellach, y Prif Weinidog gyda Phrif Weinidog y DU.
English: Finance Secretary, what use have you made of the £31 million that the Treasury have made available to the Welsh Government for Brexit preparedness? This money has arrived with your good self, but when I've questioned various Ministers at question time, there's a look of bemusement that this money is slushing around the Welsh Government. So, can you be specific what that £31 million has achieved, please?
Welsh: Ysgrifennydd cyllid, pa ddefnydd a wnaethoch o'r £31 miliwn a ddarparwyd gan y Trysorlys i Lywodraeth Cymru ar gyfer parodrwydd mewn perthynas â Brexit? Mae'r arian hwn wedi eich cyrraedd, ond pan holaf wahanol Weinidogion mewn sesiynau cwestiynau, maent yn edrych yn syn wrth glywed bod yr arian hwn yn llifo drwy Lywodraeth Cymru. Felly, a allwch ddweud yn benodol beth y mae'r £31 miliwn hwnnw wedi'i gyflawni, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: Thank you very much for the question on the Brexit preparedness funding. Of course, we have introduced the £50 million fund for preparedness for Brexit and a number of statements have been made by portfolio Ministers as to how that's been spent. For example, the police partnership resilience scheme has recently been announced, the Association of Directors of Social Services Cymru Brexit support scheme, and preparations for the successor arrangements for those EU schemes, such as what will become the shared prosperity fund and so on. There is another £10 million within the funding of that £31 million, which is yet to be allocated. I'm having discussions currently with the First Minister and with officials across Government with a view to coming forward with a further announcement as to how that money will be spent, but that discussion is very active at the moment.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn am eich cwestiwn ar gyllid parodrwydd ar gyfer Brexit. Wrth gwrs, rydym wedi cyflwyno'r gronfa £50 miliwn ar gyfer parodrwydd ar gyfer Brexit ac mae Gweinidogion portffolio wedi gwneud nifer o ddatganiadau ynglŷn â sut y mae'r arian hwnnw wedi'i wario. Er enghraifft, yn ddiweddar, cyhoeddwyd cynllun cydnerthedd partneriaeth yr heddlu, cynllun cymorth Cymdeithas Cyfarwyddwyr Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol Cymru ar gyfer Brexit, a pharatoadau ar gyfer y trefniadau olynol ar gyfer y cynlluniau UE hynny, megis beth a ddaw'n gronfa ffyniant gyffredin ac ati. Mae £10 miliwn arall o fewn y £31 miliwn hwnnw o gyllid nad yw wedi'i ddyrannu eto. Rwy'n trafod ar hyn o bryd gyda'r Prif Weinidog a swyddogion ar draws y Llywodraeth gyda'r bwriad o wneud cyhoeddiad pellach ynglŷn â sut y caiff yr arian hwnnw ei wario, ond mae'r drafodaeth honno'n mynd rhagddi ar hyn o bryd.
English: I draw Members' attention to my register of interests, as chair of the programme monitoring committee dealing with European funding. Could I concur with the comments that have been made by David Rees, my neighbour in the Aberavon constituency and also Chair of the External Affairs and Additional Legislation Committee, on the red lines that the Government have drawn, both in terms of the whole funding, which we understand could, actually, be greater, based on the current EU calculations, than the current £680 million that should come to Wales, but also the levers in order to make the decisions on how we allocate and distribute that funding, perhaps in a different way, post Brexit as well? It seems all the more urgent after last night's vote, once again. The Treasury typically tends to be - at the moment, certainly - fiscally conservative, but with a small 'c' conservative in their approach as well towards devolution. So, could I re-emphasise the point that David made, which is: what discussions is she and her officials having with Treasury officials, who, ultimately, will be the ones sitting around the Cabinet table, that not only help influence but will make the determination on whether the Welsh Government's red lines are respected, and that the money is passed back to Wales and also the levers of power to do as we want with it?
Welsh: Tynnaf sylw'r Aelodau at fy nghofrestr buddiannau, fel cadeirydd pwyllgor monitro'r rhaglen sy'n ymwneud â chyllid Ewropeaidd. A gaf fi gytuno â'r sylwadau a wnaed gan David Rees, fy nghymydog yn etholaeth Aberafan a Chadeirydd y Pwyllgor Materion Allanol a Deddfwriaeth Ychwanegol ar y llinellau coch a dynnwyd gan y Llywodraeth, o ran y cyllid yn ei gyfanrwydd, a allai fod yn fwy, mewn gwirionedd, yn ôl yr hyn a ddeallwn, yn seiliedig ar gyfrifiadau presennol yr UE, na'r £680 miliwn presennol a ddylai ddod i Gymru, ond hefyd y dulliau ar gyfer gwneud y penderfyniadau ynglŷn â sut y dyrannwn ac y dosbarthwn yr arian hwnnw, efallai mewn ffordd wahanol, ar ôl Brexit hefyd? Ymddengys bod mwy a mwy o frys ar ôl y bleidlais neithiwr, unwaith eto. Fel arfer, mae'r Trysorlys yn tueddu i fod - ar hyn o bryd, yn sicr - yn geidwadol yn ariannol, ond ceidwadol gydag 'c' fach o ran eu hymagwedd tuag at ddatganoli hefyd. Felly, a gaf fi ailbwysleisio'r pwynt a wnaeth David, sef: pa drafodaethau y mae hi a'i swyddogion yn eu cael gyda swyddogion y Trysorlys, sef y rhai, yn y pen draw, a fydd yn eistedd o amgylch bwrdd y Cabinet, nid yn unig i helpu i ddylanwadu ond hefyd i wneud y penderfyniad ynglŷn ag a fydd llinellau coch Llywodraeth Cymru yn cael eu parchu, a bod yr arian yn cael ei basio'n ôl i Gymru yn ogystal â'r grym i wneud fel y dymunwn ag ef?
English: Thank you very much for raising the important point that it's not simply the quantum of money that is important, although that clearly is - it's actually how that money is made available to us to allocate to our Welsh Government priorities. We can't see a rolling back of 20 years of devolution through attempts by the UK Government to power grab in this area. Proposals such as a city deal kind of scenario for using that money are completely inappropriate. There is no role here for the Secretary of State for Wales. This is very much funding that the Welsh Government needs to be allocating to meet our priorities in our communities, because we have the local knowledge, the understanding and the necessary networks to ensure that we make effective use of such funding here in Wales. We're very, very clear that the baseline of the Welsh Government's block grant must be increased every year in line with the level of funding that we currently receive from the EU every year, without any clawback or top-slicing of that funding as well. I would just put on record again that we're extremely frustrated at the lack of detail from the UK Government with regard to the shared prosperity fund.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr iawn am godi'r pwynt pwysig nad swm yr arian yn unig sy'n bwysig, er bod hynny'n amlwg yn bwysig - ond sut y caiff yr arian hwnnw ei ddarparu inni i'w ddyrannu yn unol â blaenoriaethau Llywodraeth Cymru. Ni allwn weld 20 mlynedd o ddatganoli yn cael eu dad-wneud drwy ymdrechion gan Lywodraeth y DU i gipio grym yn y maes hwn. Mae cynigion megis senario debyg i fargen ddinesig ar gyfer defnyddio'r arian hwnnw yn hollol amhriodol. Nid oes rôl yma i Ysgrifennydd Gwladol Cymru. Mae hwn yn arian y mae angen i Lywodraeth Cymru ei ddyrannu i gyd-fynd â'n blaenoriaethau yn ein cymunedau, gan fod gennym y wybodaeth leol, y ddealltwriaeth a'r rhwydweithiau angenrheidiol i sicrhau ein bod yn gwneud defnydd effeithiol o gyllid o'r fath yma yng Nghymru. Rydym wedi dweud yn glir iawn fod yn rhaid cynyddu llinell sylfaen grant bloc Llywodraeth Cymru bob blwyddyn yn unol â lefel y cyllid a gawn gan yr UE bob blwyddyn ar hyn o bryd, heb unrhyw adfachu neu frigdorri'r cyllid hwnnw chwaith. Dywedaf ar goedd eto ein bod yn teimlo'n rhwystredig iawn oherwydd y diffyg manylion gan Lywodraeth y DU ynglŷn â'r gronfa ffyniant gyffredin.