techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Thank you. I'd just like to spend a minute or two looking more specifically at post-16 education. The percentage of further education colleges who have reached a good or better standard has increased, of course, over the past inspection cycle. I'd just like to ask what you think is responsible for that, and are there any lessons we can take out of that and transfer to other sectors within education?
Welsh: Diolch. Fe licien i jest dreulio munud neu ddwy yn edrych yn fwy penodol ar addysg ôl-16. Mae'r ganran o golegau addysg bellach sydd wedi cyrraedd safon dda neu well wedi cynyddu, wrth gwrs, yn y cylch arolygu diwethaf. Fe fyddwn i jest yn licio gofyn beth ydych chi'n meddwl sy'n gyfrifol am hynny, ac a oes yna ryw wersi y gallwn eu cymryd ac efallai eu trosglwyddo i rai o'r sectorau eraill o fewn addysg?
English: Thank you for the question, but I'm going to ask Simon to answer.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiwn, ond rydw i'n mynd i ofyn i Simon ateb hwn.
English: Welcome to the Culture, Welsh Language and Communications Committee. Item 1: introductions, apologies, substitutions and declarations of interest. Welcome to Members and witnesses, and also welcome to Dai Lloyd, who's here at the meeting in the virtue of his role as the Chair of the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, which is clearly interested in the regulations we are considering here today. Do any Members have anything to declare? No. Thank you very much. Apologies and substitutions: we have no apologies or substitutions. We're just waiting for a couple of Members to join us.
Welsh: Croeso i'r Pwyllgor Diwylliant, y Gymraeg a Chyfathrebu. Eitem 1: cyflwyniad, ymddiheuriadau, dirprwyon a datgan buddiannau. Croeso i Aelodau a'r tystion, a hefyd croeso i Dai Lloyd, sy'n bresennol yn y cyfarfod yn sgil ei rôl fel Cadeirydd y Pwyllgor Iechyd, Gofal Cymdeithasol a Chwaraeon, sydd â diddordeb clir yn y rheoliadau y mae'r pwyllgor yma yn eu hystyried heddiw. A oes gan unrhyw Aelod rywbeth i'w ddatgan yma heddiw? Na. Grêt. Diolch yn fawr iawn. Ymddiheuriadau a dirprwyon: nid oes ymddiheuriadau na dirprwyon. Rydym ni jest yn aros am gwpl o Aelodau i ymuno â ni.
English: Thank you. Anyone else?
Welsh: Diolch. Unrhyw un arall?
English: We use this video and we have produced another one this year, where we focus on patients. Now, Ioan's video - he was a two-year-old boy, who was being brought up in an entirely Welsh-speaking household, and I asked him to identify parts of his body, and he could only do that through the medium of Welsh. I then asked him in English and he continued to play. So, we're trying to demonstrate to our staff how important is it to use the language that's appropriate to the patient. This year we've produced a video with a service user within mental health and learning disabilities, where the patient was very anxious, and he received therapy through the medium of English initially and then received therapy, by chance, through the medium of Welsh. We've assessed the difference that the therapy made. We're trying to demonstrate to our staff - . We show this videos in language awareness sessions and in assimilation sessions for new staff joining the health board. So, we're trying to convey how important it is to record the patient's language choice and to implement that wherever possible.
Welsh: Rŷm ni'n defnyddio'r fideo ac rydym ni wedi cynhyrchu un arall eleni, lle rydym ni'n defnyddio cleifion. So, fideo Ioan - roedd e'n fachgen dwy flwydd oed, yn cael ei fagu mewn cartref hollol Gymraeg, ac roeddwn i'n gofyn iddo fe adnabod rhannau o'i gorff, a dim ond yn Gymraeg oedd e'n deall. Roeddwn i'n gofyn iddo fe wedyn yn Saesneg a dyma fe'n cario ymlaen i chwarae. Felly, rŷm ni'n trial dangos i'n staff pa mor bwysig yw e i ddefnyddio'r iaith sy'n briodol i'r claf. Wedyn, eleni rŷm ni wedi cynhyrchu fideo gyda defnyddiwr gwasanaeth o fewn anableddau dysgu ac iechyd meddwl, lle roedd y claf yn gofidio lot, ac fe gafodd e therapi drwy gyfrwng y Saesneg i ddechrau ac wedyn cafodd e therapi, drwy hap a damwain, drwy'r Gymraeg. Rŷm ni wedi asesu'r gwahaniaeth roedd y therapi yn ei wneud. So, rŷm ni'n trial dangos wedyn i'n staff - . Rŷm ni'n dangos y fideos hyn mewn sesiynau ymwybyddiaeth iaith a phob sesiwn cynefino yn wythnosol i staff newydd sy'n ymuno â'r bwrdd iechyd. Rŷm ni'n trial cyfleu pa mor bwysig yw e i gofnodi dewis iaith y claf ac wedyn i weithredu hynny bob tro y mae'n bosib.
English: Okay. We have received evidence from, for example, meddwl.org and Cymdeithas yr Iaith, who have noted their concerns regarding these regulations, and that, as you have described there Enfys - . They are concerned that people would not be able to have those rights to use the Welsh language, and perhaps how they are treated, or how they access primary care specifically. Do you have an opinion on that? You welcome the fact that it's less bureaucratic and that it's more pragmatic. What is your opinion regarding how users will be able to engage with primary care?
Welsh: Ocê. Rŷm ni wedi cael tystiolaeth gan, er enghraifft, meddwl.org a chan Gymdeithas yr Iaith, sy'n nodi pryder ynghylch y rheoliadau yma, ac na fyddai, fel rydych chi'n ei ddisgrifio Enfys - . Maen nhw'n pryderu na fyddai pobl yn gallu cael yr hawl i ddefnyddio'r iaith, ac efallai sut maen nhw'n cael eu trin, neu sut maen nhw'n cael mynediad at ofal sylfaenol yn benodol. A oes barn gyda chi yn hynny o beth? Rydych chi'n croesawu ei fod e'n llai biwrocrataidd a'i fod e'n fwy pragmatig. Beth ydych chi'n ei feddwl o sut mae defnyddwyr yn mynd i allu ymwneud â gofal sylfaenol?
English: Well, at the moment, we're a long way from being perfect, but I would ask the question: what service is perfect? At the moment, certainly within Hywel Dda, we record patients' language choice at the first point of contact. There is a unified assessment sheet for patients entering the hospital. It's not always possible to provide that language of choice throughout their time in hospital, but what we tell all members of staff is that, although we do not force anyone to speak Welsh all of the time - not everyone can learn a second language, we know that - but what we ask staff to do is to be entirely aware of the patient's language choice and know what to do when action is needed in that area, so that they're aware of the other staff on shift who are able to provide services in Welsh and that they flag that up during shift change-over and so on. So, there are processes in place, although they can't perhaps help directly, but they would assist the patient during their time in the hospital.
Welsh: Wel, ar hyn o bryd, rŷm ni'n bell o fod yn berffaith, ond byddwn i'n gofyn y cwestiwn: pa wasanaeth sydd yn berffaith? Ar hyn o bryd, yn sicr o fewn Hywel Dda, rŷm ni'n cofnodi dewis iaith cleifion ar y pwynt cyntaf maen nhw'n dod i'n gwasanaeth ni. Mae yna unified assessment sheet ar gyfer cleifion sy'n dod i'r ysbyty. Nid yw hi bob amser yn bosib gweithredu'r dewis iaith yna drwy gydol eu hamser nhw yn yr ysbyty, ond beth rŷm ni'n ei ddweud wrth bob aelod o staff yw, er nad ydym ni'n gorfodi neb i siarad Cymraeg drwy'r amser - ddim pawb sy'n gallu dysgu ail iaith - beth rŷm ni yn gofyn i staff ei wneud yw bod yn hollol ymwybodol o ddewis iaith y claf a gwybod beth i'w wneud pan fydd angen gweithredu ar hynny, felly eu bod nhw'n ymwybodol pwy yw'r staff eraill sydd ar y sifft sy'n gallu siarad Cymraeg a'u bod nhw'n ei fflagio fe wrth iddyn nhw wneud shift change-over ac ati. So, mae yna brosesau mewn lle i weithredu, er efallai eu bod nhw'n methu helpu yn uniongyrchol, ond eu bod nhw yn cynorthwyo'r claf yn ystod ei gyfnod yn yr ysbyty.
English: Do you think that training should go hand-in-hand with those regulations - that you can't do one without the other?
Welsh: A ydych chi'n credu bod angen hyfforddiant i ddod ynghlwm, cam wrth gam, wrth y rheoliadau - yn sicr, nid oes modd gwneud un heb y llall?
English: Yes, of course, I understand that, and every time I visit different hospitals, I do see that Glangwili provides an excellent service in the Welsh language. Many of the nurses and doctors there, and of course many of the patients, speak Welsh, and you do get a natural service there. But of course that's not the experience everywhere. Because there is still that feeling that, especially with GPs in our more rural areas, you're lucky to have a doctor anyway, and now you want one who speaks Welsh as well. Well, that's asking too much, isn't it? People forget that basic point, that you can improve the standard of care by communicating in those naturally Welsh areas in their first language. So, yes, we're lucky to have a doctor, full stop, but we need to build on that. And that's the whole point of having these standards, but I don't see these standards as being bold enough to enable that. I understand you want to build on what happens, but we need some sort of trigger, to make sure that things happen quicker.
Welsh: Rwy'n derbyn hynny, a phob tro rwy'n mynd i'r gwahanol ysbytai yma, mae'n rhaid imi ddweud bod Ysbyty Glangwili yn darparu gwasanaeth neilltuol yn y Gymraeg. Mae yna nifer fawr o nyrsys a meddygon, ac wrth gwrs y rhan fwyaf o'r cleifion, yn siarad Cymraeg, ac rydych chi'n cael gwasanaeth naturiol yn y fan honno. Ond nid dyna'r profiad ym mhob man. Achos mae yna'n dal yr awyrgylch yma eich bod chi, yn enwedig efo meddygon teulu yn ein llefydd mwyaf gwledig ni, yn ffodus i gael meddyg ta beth, yn y lle cyntaf; nawr rydych chi eisiau cael rhywun sy'n siarad Cymraeg ar ben hynny - mae'n gofyn gormod. Mae pobl yn anghofio'r pwynt sylfaenol yna, eich bod chi'n gallu gwella safon y gofal drwy allu cyfathrebu, yn enwedig yn ein hardaloedd naturiol Gymraeg ni, yn eu hiaith gyntaf. So, ie, rydym ni'n ffodus i gael meddyg o gwbl, ond mae eisiau adeiladu ar hynny. Dyna beth ydy diben cael safonau, ond nid wyf yn gweld y safonau hyn yn ddigon dewr i alluogi hynny. Rwy'n derbyn adeiladu ar beth sy'n digwydd, ond hefyd mae eisiau rhyw fath o sbardun i wneud yn siŵr bod pethau'n digwydd yn fwy cyflym nag y maen nhw.
English: And also, the standards assist each other. You would look at the recruitment standards after that. For example, in primary care, there are roles that are developing continuously within GP surgeries - nurse practitioners, and so on - and those do tend to be more local people. So, the cohort of people you're recruiting, because they tend to be more local, you are using those people available to you. So, in those areas where you have a high percentage of Welsh speakers, you will be more likely to recruit a Welsh speaker to those posts. So, I do see these standards actually supporting each other, in order for us to develop and improve services.
Welsh: A hefyd, mae'r safonau yn cynorthwyo ei gilydd. Byddech chi'n edrych ar y safonau recriwtio wedi hynny. Er enghraifft, yng ngofal sylfaenol mae yna rolau yn datblygu o hyd ac o hyd o fewn meddygfeydd teulu - nurse practitioners, ac ati - lle mae'r rheini'n tueddu i fod yn bobl mwy lleol, felly mae'r band o bobl rydych chi'n mynd atynt i'w recriwtio wedi hynny, os ydyn nhw'n tueddu i fod yn fwy lleol, rydych chi'n defnyddio'r bobl sydd gyda chi. Felly, mewn ardaloedd lle mae nifer y siaradwyr Cymraeg yn uchel, byddech chi'n fwy tebygol o recriwtio siaradwyr Cymraeg i'r swyddi hynny. Felly, rwy'n gweld y safonau hyn yn cefnogi ei gilydd hefyd, er mwyn ein cynorthwyo ni i wella'r gwasanaethau.
English: And my final point, then, in terms of one of the questions I have here: as health boards, of course, you are supposed to be proactive. It's difficult to know sometimes whether someone can speak Welsh or not - whether a nurse, a doctor, or a patient, it's not always clear. So, you need to be proactive in that. Rather than insisting that the patient always has to ask for a Welsh-medium service, it needs to be visible and natural - and more than just posters and signs. I'm talking about a standard of care on a face-to-face level - something like these lanyards, of course, make it very clear that you're a Welsh speaker. So, as Welsh speakers, I suppose we can be a bit shy, and maybe we don't like to insist on having particular services, especially when maybe we're unwell, and under a lot of stress, and we don't want to insist on having a Welsh speaker on top of everything else. So, it needs to be made clear, and it needs to be a natural thing, to show that such a service is available, by being proactive. I think that's in the standards somewhere, but can you see that that's also important?
Welsh: Fy mhwynt olaf i, yn nhermau un o'r cwestiynau sydd gyda ni fan hyn: fel byrddau iechyd, rydych chi i fod i weithio ac i gynnig bod yn rhagweithiol. Hynny yw, mae'n anodd iawn dweud weithiau os ydy rhywun yn gallu siarad Cymraeg ai peidio - nyrs, meddyg, claf; nid yw'n amlwg, felly mae eisiau bod yn rhagweithiol. Yn lle mynnu bod y claf wastad yn gofyn am wasanaeth Cymraeg, mae eisiau ei wneud o'n weladwy ac yn naturiol - mwy na jest arwyddion. Rwy'n sôn am safon gofal wyneb yn wyneb efo'r claf, ac mae pethau fel cortyn gwddf, ac ati, sy'n ei gwneud hi'n hollol amlwg. Achos, yn naturiol, fel siaradwyr Cymraeg, rydym ni'n gallu bod yn swil ac yn fewnblyg, ac ati, ac nid ydym yn licio mynnu, yn enwedig pan fyddwn yn sâl ac o dan ddigon o stress yn y lle cyntaf, ac nid ydym eisiau mynnu bod rhywun yn gallu siarad Cymraeg ar ben popeth arall sy'n digwydd. So, mae eisiau ei gwneud hi'n hollol amlwg ac yn naturiol bod y fath wasanaeth ar gael, drwy fod yn rhagweithiol. Mae hyn yn y safonau yn rhywle, ond a ydych chi'n gallu gweld bod hynny hefyd yn bwysig?
English: Without doubt. And I think that the 'More than just words' framework has set the foundations for that. Every health board is proactive. The nurses do have the Iaith Gwaith badge sewn into their uniforms. There are other areas of expertise also considering that approach. And in Hywel Dda we are working proactively with GP surgeries, and our challenge now is to work with the other independent contractors - within pharmacies, and within dentistry. But we do carry out an annual survey, where we ask GP surgeries how many Welsh speakers they have on their staff, whether they use the Iaith Gwaith produce, whether they display information bilingually, and what support they need from us as a health board. And then we do that on an annual basis, and seek to make improvements on the basis of that.
Welsh: Yn bendant. Ac rwy'n credu bod fframwaith 'Mwy na geiriau' wedi gosod y seiliau ar gyfer hynny. Mae pob bwrdd iechyd yn rhagweithiol. Mae'r nyrsys yn cael y bathodyn Iaith Gwaith wedi ei wnïo mewn i'w hiwnifform. Mae yna arbenigeddau eraill yn edrych ar wneud hynny hefyd. Ac, yn Hywel Dda, rydym ni'n gweithio'n rhagweithiol, wedi bod gyda meddygfeydd teulu; ein her ni nawr yw gweithio gyda'r contractwyr annibynnol eraill, o fewn fferyllfeydd a deintyddiaeth. Ond rydym ni'n gwneud arolwg blynyddol, lle rydym ni'n gofyn i'r meddygfeydd teulu faint o siaradwyr Cymraeg sydd gyda nhw ar eu staff, a ydyn nhw'n defnyddio nwyddau Iaith Gwaith, a ydyn nhw'n arddangos posteri a gwybodaeth dwyieithog, a pha gefnogaeth y maen nhw ei angen wrthym ni fel bwrdd iechyd. Ac wedi hynny rydym ni'n gwneud hynny'n flynyddol, ac yn treial gwella o hynny.
English: Thank you. I am aware of time - I'm sorry, Chair.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr. Rwy'n ymwybodol o amser - sori, Cadeirydd.
English: Thank you. Before bringing Siân Gwenllian in, because she's going to look at primary care also, I just wanted to ask in relation to out-patients. The regulations will include in-patients, but we have had evidence to say that, if you have an eating disorder, for example, you're not always admitted to hospital unless you are extremely ill, usually, and therefore we have had evidence showing concern that there won't be sufficient service for them through the medium of Welsh, if those out-patients don't fall within the scope of the regulations. What's your opinion on that?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr. Cyn dod â Siân Gwenllian i mewn, achos mas Siân yn mynd i wneud gofal sylfaenol hefyd, roeddwn i jest eisiau gofyn ynglŷn â'r cleifion allanol. Mae'r rheoliadau yn mynd i gwmpasu cleifion mewnol, ond rydym ni wedi cael tystiolaeth yn dweud, er enghraifft, os ydych chi'n cael problem anhwylder bwyta, nid ydych fel arfer yn mynd mewn i'r ysbyty heb eich bod chi'n sâl iawn, gan amlaf, ond wedyn mae tystiolaeth rydym ni wedi'i chael eu bod nhw'n poeni wedyn na fydd yna ddigon o wasanaeth iddyn nhw drwy gyfrwng y Gymraeg, os nad yw'r cleifion allanol hynny yn dod o fewn y cwmpawd y rheoliadau. Beth yw'ch barn chi yn hynny o beth?
English: Once again, as a health board, we wouldn't treat them any differently - a patient is a patient.
Welsh: Eto, fel bwrdd iechyd, ni fyddem yn eu trin nhw mewn unrhyw ffordd wahanol - claf yw claf.
English: But what if the regulations don't treat them in the same way?
Welsh: Pam nad yw'r rheoliadau yn eu trin nhw yr un peth?
English: There are things in place already, where recording language choice happens. And, therefore, I do think that the greatest challenge perhaps will be for our own systems across the health service, across Wales. Systems don't communicate with each other. Patient notes aren't all available electronically. You could be going to a speech and language therapy clinic today, for example, where everything is recorded on paper, and in three days, you may be in A&E and your record will be electronic, and those hard copies won't have been fed in.
Welsh: Mae yna bethau o fewn e. Mae pethau'n bodoli'n barod lle mae cofnodi dewis iaith yn digwydd. Felly, rwy'n credu mai'r her mwyaf o bosib yw'n systemau ni ar draws y gwasanaeth iechyd, ar draws Cymru. Nid yw'r systemau yn siarad â'i gilydd. Nid yw nodiadau'r cleifion yn electronig i gyd. Gallech chi fod yn mynd i glinig therapi iaith a lleferydd heddiw lle mae popeth yn cael ei gofnodi ar bapur, ac o fewn tridiau, efallai byddwch chi'n mynd i A&E a bydd eich cofnod chi'n electronig, ond bydd y nodiadau papur heb gael eu bwydo mewn.
English: The problem is of course that there is no obligation therefore to do that if they are out-patients, whereas if they're treated clinically on an in-patient basis there'll be different regulations. That's what I'm trying to ask. Systems are systems, of course, and different processes are required, but if they're not included within the scope of the regulations, then you could treat patients differently.
Welsh: Ond y broblem yw nad oes gorfodaeth wedyn i wneud hynny os maen nhw'n allanol, lle os maen nhw'n cael eu trin yn glinigol yn fewnol mae yna rheoliadau gwahanol. Dyna beth rwy'n trio gofyn. Mae systemau yn systemau ac mae angen prosesau gwahanol, ond os nad ydyn nhw'n cael eu cwmpasu o fewn y rheoliadau, rydych chi'n gallu trin y claf yn wahanol.
English: It does note in other standards that however an individual approaches the service, be it a complaint or over the phone, that we are to record the language of choice. Therefore, I do think that other standards would deal with that.
Welsh: Mae e yn nodi mewn safonau eraill pa bynnag ffordd y mae unrhyw unigolyn yn dod at y gwasanaeth, boed yn cwyno, neu dros y ffôn, ein bod ni fod i gofnodi'r dewis iaith. Felly, rwy'n credu bod safonau eraill yn cwmpasu hynny.
English: Just quickly on the clinical consultations, and of course, we are all in agreement about the importance of having that consultation through the medium of the language that people feel happiest in. We're all in agreement that that's important. Perhaps where we disagree is how we get to that situation. Perhaps we can see that the face-to-face service just isn't there now in the standards as they are set out at the moment, and I understand there are pragmatic reasons for that. But do you think that there could have been contained within the regulations, as they are now, some sort of prioritisation in certain areas; maybe standards in relation to dementia patients, for example; maybe some standards in relation to children under five years of age, where the need is very, very clear? If there were such regulations in place, would that make your work of prioritising and workforce planning, for example, easier for the future?
Welsh: Jest yn sydyn ar yr ymgynghoriadau clinigol yma, ac wrth gwrs, rydym ni gyd yn cytuno efo pwysigrwydd cael yr ymgynghoriad yna drwy'r iaith y mae rhywun yn teimlo gryfaf yn mynegi'u hunain. Rydym ni gyd yn cytuno efo hynny. Lle rydym ni'n anghytuno efallai ydy sut rydym ni'n cyrraedd at y sefyllfa yna. Ac mae rhywun yn gweld nad yw'r gwasanaeth wyneb yn wyneb yna rŵan yn y safonau fel y maen nhw'n cael eu gosod ar hyn o bryd, ac mae rhywun yn deall bod yna resymau pragmataidd dros hynny. Ond a ydych chi'n meddwl y gellid bod wedi cynnwys yn y rheoliadau - fel y maen nhw rŵan - rhywfaint o flaenoriaethu mewn meysydd penodol; rhyw fath o safonau, er enghraifft, o gwmpas cleifion dementia; rhyw fath o safonau o gwmpas plant o dan bump oed lle mae'r angen yn glir iawn, iawn? Petai yna reoliadau felly, a fyddai hynny'n gwneud eich gwaith chi o flaenoriaethu a chynllunio'r gweithlu a'r gwasanaeth yn haws i'r dyfodol?
English: The Government has set out seven priority groups already, and they are set out clearly in 'Mwy na geiriau'/'More than just words', so the framework is already there.
Welsh: Mae yna grwpiau blaenoriaeth wedi cael eu gosod gan y Llywodraeth yn barod; mae saith grŵp blaenoriaeth, ac mae'r rheini'n cael eu nodi'n glir yn 'Mwy na geiriau', felly mae'r fframwaith yna'n barod.
English: But they're not in the standards. Would those seven priority areas be useful? That's what I'm getting at. The standards themselves don't provide rights for people to have face-to-face services through the medium of Welsh. That right just isn't there. I understand that there are pragmatic reasons for that, but what I'm trying to do is to highlight the fact - . We have the 'Mwy na geiriau'/'More than just words' strategy, which states quite clearly that the need exists, but that isn't reflected in the standards. And I was just wondering if there is middle ground between the regulations as they were presented in 2016 and what we have now. I know that you're not lawyers, but in a pragmatic sense, is there a means of prioritising within the standards? And if that were to be possible, would that facilitate your work in terms of workforce planning for the future? I saw you nodding there.
Welsh: Ond nid ydynt yn y safonau. A fyddai'r saith grŵp yna - ? Dyna beth rwy'n trio mynd ato fo. Nid yw'r safonau eu hunain yn rhoi hawliau i bobl gael gwasanaeth wyneb yn wyneb; nid yw'r hawl hwnnw yna. Rwy'n deall bod yna resymau pragmataidd, ac felly, beth rwy'n trio ei wneud ydy hwyluso'r ffaith - . Mae gennym ni'r strategaeth 'Mwy na geiriau' sydd yn dweud yn hollol glir bod yr angen yna, ond eto, nid yw hynny'n cael ei adlewyrchu yn y safonau. Tybed a oes yna fan canol rhwng y rheoliadau fel y cawson nhw eu cyflwyno yn 2016 a beth sydd gennym ni rŵan? Rwy'n gwybod nad cyfreithwyr ydych chi, ond mewn ffordd bragmataidd, a oes yna ffordd o flaenoriaethu o fewn y safonau? A phetai hynny'n bosib, a fyddai hynny'n hwyluso'ch gwaith chi o gynllunio'r gweithlu i'r dyfodol? Rwy'n eich gweld chi'n nodio.
English: But if you were to ask for regulations on the seven priority groups as they are set out now, well, if you don't fall within those priority groups, then what would happen?
Welsh: Ond pe baech chi'n gofyn am osod rheoliadau ar, er enghraifft, y saith grŵp blaenoriaeth fel maen nhw wedi'u nodi nawr, os nad ydych yn cwympo o fewn y saith grŵp blaenoriaeth hynny wedi hynny, beth fyddai'n digwydd?