English: Well, I would start off by saying that Welsh Government fundamentally disagrees with your assertion that it should be the leaseholders who pay for this. Welsh Government is clear, and has been clear throughout, that, actually, it's the building developers who should be responsible for the remediation work. And that's why I met with all of the developers and managing agents of the private sector high-rise buildings in Wales to ask them about their plans to remediate the ACM cladding issues, and to also make clear again the Welsh Government's position on funding this work - that we don't want to see the leaseholders left to pick up the bill. So, I'm pleased to report and see progress on two of the buildings, where work is either complete, pending certification or at an advanced stage and is anticipated to be finalised next month. I also understand that further tests have been commissioned on ACM at a further two buildings, and, again, this is because we have a good relationship and a casework approach - we're being kept very up to date on progress there. But I am frustrated, though, that, whilst plans have been drawn up to replace cladding on the remaining buildings, which are under one developer, action to do so isn't yet in place, and this is because of the financial complexities and the interplay between those interested parties. But, again, safety must come first and we've been very clear with them that we expect to see action soon. If there's not action taken soon, then, of course, Welsh Government will continue to liaise with the developers, but also with the relevant council and fire and rescue service on these matters, who do have significant enforcement powers should they be concerned about the safety of the residents.
Welsh: Wel, buaswn yn dechrau drwy ddweud bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn anghytuno'n sylfaenol â'ch honiad y dylai'r lesddeiliaid dalu am hyn. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn glir, ac mae wedi bod yn glir drwy gydol y broses, mai'r datblygwyr adeiladu ddylai fod yn gyfrifol am y gwaith adfer mewn gwirionedd. A dyna pam y cyfarfûm â holl ddatblygwyr ac asiantau rheoli adeiladau uchel y sector preifat yng Nghymru i ofyn iddynt am eu cynlluniau i adfer problemau cladin ACM, a hefyd i egluro safbwynt Llywodraeth Cymru ar ariannu'r gwaith hwn unwaith eto - nad ydym eisiau i'r lesddeiliaid orfod talu'r bil. Felly, rwy'n falch o weld cynnydd mewn perthynas â dau o'r adeiladau, lle mae'r gwaith naill ai wedi'i gwblhau, yn aros am ardystiad neu bron â gorffen a disgwylir y bydd yn cael ei gwblhau fis nesaf. Deallaf hefyd fod profion pellach wedi cael eu comisiynu ar ACM mewn dau adeilad arall, ac unwaith eto, y rheswm am hyn yw oherwydd bod gennym berthynas dda ac yn gweithredu dull gwaith achos - rydym yn cael y wybodaeth ddiweddaraf yn rheolaidd ar y cynnydd yno. Ond rwy'n rhwystredig, fodd bynnag, er bod cynlluniau wedi'u llunio i dynnu'r cladin oddi ar yr adeiladau sy'n weddill, sydd o dan un datblygwr, nid yw'r camau gweithredu i wneud hynny ar waith eto, ac mae hyn oherwydd y cymhlethdodau ariannol a'r cydymwneud rhwng y partïon sydd â diddordeb. Ond unwaith eto, mae'n rhaid rhoi diogelwch yn gyntaf ac rydym wedi bod yn glir iawn â hwy ynglŷn â'r ffaith ein bod yn disgwyl gweld gweithredu'n fuan. Os na weithredir yn fuan, bydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn parhau i gysylltu â'r datblygwyr, ond hefyd â'r cyngor perthnasol a'r gwasanaeth tân ac achub mewn perthynas â'r materion hyn, gan fod ganddynt bwerau gorfodi sylweddol pe baent yn bryderus ynglŷn â diogelwch y preswylwyr.