English: You were doing so well there. Up until the last point, I was encouraged. Whenever I hear David Rowlands welcome laudable aims, I'm waiting for a big 'but', and we got the 'but' at the end with his campaign against our effort to try and save children's lives from being killed unnecessarily on the road. Certainly, the evidence that came out of our own review on 20 mph default urban speed limits did not support the view that they significantly increased emissions. Just to go through some of the other points, the loan has been agreed with Blaenau Gwent council, it has been committed to the task at hand, and we're working closely with them. I do agree with his point on the gradual shift out of car use towards alternatives, and it is clearly not something that applies to every journey. We're not saying that people must never use cars again. Clearly, the car is the most practical option for some journeys, but, for most journeys - the research is quite clear on this - sustainable transport is a realistic option, providing the infrastructure is in place, the services are in place, and the information and the incentives are in place to encourage people to make that shift. There are bags of evidence and experience of where that can happen. Where there's a will, there's a way. There's no need for punitive language; this isn't a punitive choice. Done properly, this can enhance and improve people's lives and improve people's journeys, reduce people's stress and improve people's health - bus users walk more than car users. So, it is good for a whole range of public health targets that we have. He is right to say that it's not going to be suitable for all, but we don't need it to be done by everybody to achieve our targets. As I say, we're talking about a 5 per cent reduction in car mileage by 2030; this is not beyond what can be achieved, for sure. His point on electric cars being expensive is also a sound one. This is why we want to make sure that there is an affordable and realistic alternative through public transport. I think what we really want to see is for people not to need to have multiple cars per household. So, things like car clubs and car sharing, for example, instead of a second or third car in a household, are realistic things that that can bring people along the behaviour change spectrum with us in a way that doesn't feel like it's making their choices restrictive. In fact, it's giving them extra choices and freeing up money for them, because a car is the second most expensive capital purchase a householder will make next to a house, as I'm sure Caroline Jones has just discovered.
Welsh: Roeddech chi'n gwneud mor dda yn y fan yna. Hyd at y sylw olaf, fe'm calonogwyd. Pryd bynnag y clywaf David Rowlands yn croesawu nodau canmoladwy, rwy'n aros am 'ond' mawr, a chawsom yr 'ond' ar y diwedd gyda'i ymgyrch yn erbyn ein hymdrech i geisio achub bywydau plant rhag cael eu lladd yn ddiangen ar y ffordd. Yn sicr, nid oedd y dystiolaeth a ddeilliodd o'n hadolygiad ein hunain ar derfynau cyflymder trefol diofyn o 20 mya yn cefnogi'r farn eu bod yn cynyddu allyriadau'n sylweddol. I ymdrin â rhai o'r sylwadau eraill, cytunwyd ar y benthyciad gyda chyngor Blaenau Gwent, mae wedi ymrwymo i'r dasg dan sylw, ac rydym yn gweithio'n agos gyda nhw. Rwyf yn cytuno â'i sylw o ran gwneud y newid graddol o ddefnyddio ceir tuag at ddewisiadau eraill, ac mae'n amlwg nad yw'n rhywbeth sy'n berthnasol i bob taith. Nid ydym yn dweud na ddylai pobl fyth ddefnyddio ceir eto. Yn amlwg, y car yw'r dewis mwyaf ymarferol ar gyfer rhai teithiau, ond, ar gyfer y rhan fwyaf o deithiau - mae'r ymchwil yn eithaf clir ynglŷn â hyn - mae trafnidiaeth gynaliadwy yn ddewis realistig, ar yr amod bod y seilwaith ar waith, bod gwasanaethau ar waith, a bod yr wybodaeth a'r cymhellion ar waith i annog pobl i wneud y newid hwnnw. Mae llawer o dystiolaeth a phrofiad o ble y gall hynny ddigwydd. Ceffyl da yw ewyllys. Nid oes angen iaith sy'n sôn am gosbi pobl; nid yw hwn yn ymwneud â dewis cosbi. O'i wneud yn iawn, gall hyn gyfoethogi a gwella bywydau pobl a gwella teithiau pobl, lleihau straen pobl a gwella iechyd pobl - mae defnyddwyr bysiau'n cerdded mwy na defnyddwyr ceir. Felly, mae'n dda i ystod eang o dargedau iechyd cyhoeddus sydd gennym ni. Mae'n iawn i ddweud na fydd yn addas i bawb, ond nid oes angen i bawb wneud hynny i gyflawni ein targedau. Fel y dywedais, rydym yn sôn am ostyngiad o 5 y cant mewn milltiroedd ceir erbyn 2030; nid yw hyn y tu hwnt i'r hyn y gellir ei gyflawni, yn sicr. Mae ei sylw bod ceir trydan yn ddrud hefyd yn un cadarn. Dyna pam yr ydym ni eisiau sicrhau bod dewis amgen fforddiadwy a realistig drwy drafnidiaeth gyhoeddus. Credaf mai'r hyn yr ydym ni eisiau ei weld mewn gwirionedd yw i bobl beidio â bod angen sawl car fesul cartref. Felly, mae pethau fel clybiau ceir a rhannu ceir, er enghraifft, yn hytrach nag ail neu drydydd car ar aelwyd, yn bethau realistig a all ddod â phobl gyda ni ar hyd y sbectrwm newid ymddygiad mewn ffordd nad yw'n teimlo ei fod yn cyfyngu ar eu dewisiadau. Yn wir, mae'n rhoi dewisiadau ychwanegol iddyn nhw ac yn rhyddhau arian ar eu cyfer, oherwydd car yw'r ail beth drutaf y bydd deiliad tŷ yn ei brynu, ar ôl tŷ, fel y mae Caroline Jones newydd ei ddarganfod, rwy'n siŵr.