English: Thank you for your questions. First of all, I am very comfortable with the scrutiny that takes place in the Chamber by yourself or any other Members on this issue. I am very clear that I do believe that this shouldn't be partisan; it is about constituents who we all share an affiliation to and making sure the safety of this is paramount. So, I don't mind the scrutiny in any case. Can I say, in answer to specifics around the fire service, that I have spoken on several occasions to the senior officers in my team? I'm on call with them on a regular basis, alongside the landlords as well. Swansea council have, of their own volition, introduced fire marshals 24/7 on those blocks of flats. That's aside from the fire service, and this is based on advice from DCLG. Everything that DCLG has advised in terms of the fire safety process, Swansea and Newport are implementing - either have implemented or are implementing in that process, and they are working alongside the fire service to deliver that. I will look to see if I can qualify the discussions we've had by writing to the Member. I'm aware of that. I would hope that my word is good enough today for the Chamber, but I also respect that the Member may wish to see that in writing, and I will have a look to see if I can respond to her in that state. The capacity of the fire service, I am aware, is okay. They have told me again - this was one of the questions I had in the discussion with them about the ability to resource the issue around this - that there are no issues. In fact, they were very proactive in making sure that they were going to use staff, alongside local authority staff or landlord staff, to work with tenants, to give them confidence. I think they're a much more trusted source than politicians telling everybody it's going to be okay. When the fire service says it, I think it's just more of a trusted voice. Just for clarification to the Member, when I said the issue around testing and then a whole-system approach to testing - this is not a decision of mine. This will be based upon advice from the DCLG group. If they move from sample testing to full panel testing, then, of course, that's where we want to be, as well. I think that gives, actually, a truer result of the effects of fire safety on a building when you have a whole-system test, but if they do not recommend that and they recommend something else, that route I will take also. I will not be making a decision other than what the recommendations are from the DCLG advisory group. These are specialists in fire safety, and I will listen to those words of advice carefully. In terms of activity across Government, I am the lead Minister on this, irrespective of building regulations or fire safety or health or otherwise. I am the Minister leading on this particular issue. I will have a conversation with my team in respect of the issues you raised with one of the health boards. If you could provide me with more detail about that, that would be really useful. This is really fast moving. To do a full assessment of buildings at risk for organisations - with this material on them - is something we weren't expecting. So it is taking a little bit of time, but I'm hoping that co-ordination can be coming together on that, and I will make a point of informing the Member of exactly how that is going. On other actions we have in place, I mentioned earlier on to David Melding, with regard to what we can do if things aren't happening on the ground, that we have the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, which can be used regarding common areas of blocks of flats et cetera. We also have the role of fire service safety checks, again, where they can put prohibition notices on these areas, which can stop either the trading or the ability for them to rent properties. We can stop that through Rent Smart Wales as well. So, there are lots of actions we can take, and I am considering what powers I have also in terms of this field, but I will let Members know more detail about that. A final point, if I may, Llywydd, on building regulations. We do have powers to amend building regulations already and we have a building regulation advisory group. But, again, I will not be seeking to amend building regulations, or the Minister won't be, unless we've got evidence provided to suggest that we should. The current stated position is that the units that have been installed are compliant to building regulation standards. Now, if they are wrong or they require changing, then we will have a full assessment, again, in line with the UK Government. These panels don't just spread from Wales and England. These are used on international buildings all over the world, so we have to be very cautious in our approach: not a knee-jerk reaction to changing building regulations because it feels right. We've got to base this on evidence on what is right by the expert panel.
Welsh: Diolch i chi am eich cwestiynau. Yn gyntaf oll, rwy'n gyfforddus iawn gyda'r gwaith craffu yr ydych chi neu unrhyw Aelod arall yn ei wneud yn y Siambr ar y mater hwn. Rwy'n glir iawn fy mod yn credu na ddylai hyn fod yn bleidiol; mae'n ymwneud ag etholwyr y mae gennym ni i gyd gysylltiad â nhw ac â sicrhau bod diogelwch hyn yn hollbwysig. Felly, does dim ots gennyf am y craffu mewn unrhyw fodd. A gaf i ddweud, mewn ateb i fanylion penodol ynglŷn â'r gwasanaeth tân, fy mod i wedi siarad ar sawl achlysur ag uwch swyddogion yn fy nhîm? Rydw i'n cyfathrebu gyda nhw'n rheolaidd, ochr yn ochr â'r landlordiaid hefyd. Mae cyngor Abertawe, o'u gwirfodd, wedi cyflwyno marsialiaid tân 24/7 yn y blociau hynny o fflatiau, ac mae hyn yn seiliedig ar gyngor gan yr Adran Gymunedau a Llywodraeth Leol. Mae Abertawe a Chasnewydd yn gweithredu popeth a argymhellwyd gan yr Adran Gymunedau a Llywodraeth Leol - naill ai wedi eu gweithredu neu yn eu gweithredu yn y broses honno, ac maen nhw'n gweithio ochr yn ochr â'r gwasanaeth tân i gyflawni hynny. Byddaf yn edrych i weld a allaf grynhoi'r trafodaethau a gawsom ni drwy ysgrifennu at yr Aelod. Rwy'n ymwybodol o hynny. Byddwn yn gobeithio bod fy ngair yn ddigon da heddiw i'r Siambr, ond rwyf hefyd yn parchu o bosib fod yr Aelod yn dymuno gweld hynny yn ysgrifenedig, a byddaf yn edrych i weld a alla i ymateb iddi ar y ffurf honno. Rwy'n ymwybodol fod y gwasanaeth tân yn iawn o ran capasiti. Maen nhw wedi dweud wrthyf unwaith eto - dyma un o'r cwestiynau oedd gen i yn y drafodaeth gyda nhw am y gallu i ddarparu adnoddau mewn cysylltiad â'r mater hwn - nad oes yna unrhyw broblem. Yn wir, roedden nhw'n rhagweithiol iawn yn sicrhau eu bod yn mynd i ddefnyddio staff, ochr yn ochr â staff yr awdurdod lleol neu staff landlordiaid, i weithio gyda thenantiaid, i roi hyder iddyn nhw. Rwy'n credu bod pobl yn ymddiried llawer mwy ynddyn nhw na mewn gwleidyddion sy'n dweud wrth bawb y bydd popeth yn iawn. Pan fo'r gwasanaeth tân yn dweud hynny, rwy'n credu bod pobl yn ymddiried llawer mwy yn hynny. Dim ond eglurhad i'r Aelod, pan soniais i am y sefyllfa ynglŷn â phrofi ac yna am brofi system yn ei chyfanrwydd - nid fy mhenderfyniad i yw hyn. Bydd hyn yn seiliedig ar gyngor gan grŵp yr Adran Gymunedau a Llywodraeth Leol. Os ydyn nhw'n dewis cynnal profion panel llawn yn hytrach na phrofion sampl, yna, wrth gwrs, dyna'r sefyllfa ddelfrydol, hefyd. Rwy'n credu bod hynny'n rhoi, mewn gwirionedd, ganlyniad mwy cywir o effeithiau diogelwch tân ar adeilad pan fyddwch chi'n profi system gyfan. Ond os nad ydyn nhw'n argymell hynny ac yn argymell rhywbeth arall, yna byddaf hefyd yn dewis y llwybr hwnnw. Ni fyddaf yn gwneud penderfyniad ar wahân i argymhellion grŵp cynghori'r Adran Gymunedau a Llywodraeth Leol. Mae'r rhain yn arbenigwyr diogelwch tân, a byddaf yn gwrando ar eu cyngor yn ofalus. O ran gweithgarwch ar draws y Llywodraeth, fi yw'r Gweinidog sy'n arwain ar hyn, heb ystyried rheoliadau adeiladu neu ddiogelwch tân neu iechyd neu fel arall. Fi yw'r Gweinidog sy'n arwain ar y mater penodol hwn. Byddaf yn cael sgwrs gyda fy nhîm o ran y materion a godwyd gennych chi gydag un o'r byrddau iechyd. Pe gallech roi mwy o fanylion i mi am hynny, byddai hynny'n ddefnyddiol iawn. Mae hyn yn datblygu'n gyflym iawn. Mae gwneud asesiad llawn ar gyfer sefydliadau o adeiladau sydd mewn perygl - gyda'r deunydd hwn arnynt - yn rhywbeth nad oeddem ni yn ei ddisgwyl. Felly mae'n cymryd peth amser, ond rwy'n gobeithio bod y cydlynnu'n dechrau gwella yn hynny o beth, a byddaf yn siŵr o roi gwybod i'r Aelod sut yn union mae hynny'n datblygu. Ynglŷn â'r camau eraill sydd gennym ar waith, soniais yn gynharach am David Melding, a'r hyn y gallwn ni ei wneud os nad yw pethau'n digwydd ar lawr gwlad, bod gennym ni Orchymyn Diwygio Rheoleiddio (Diogelwch Tân) 2005, y gellir ei ddefnyddio mewn cysylltiad â mannau cyffredin mewn blociau fflatiau ac ati. Mae gennym ni hefyd swyddogaeth archwiliadau diogelwch y gwasanaeth tân, unwaith eto, lle mae modd iddyn nhw roi hysbysiadau gwahardd ar y mannau hyn, sy'n gallu atal naill ai'r masnachu neu eu gallu i rentu eiddo. Gallwn roi'r gorau i hynny trwy Rhentu Doeth Cymru hefyd. Felly, fe allwn ni wneud sawl peth, ac rwy'n ystyried pa rymoedd sydd gen i hefyd o ran y maes hwn, ond byddaf yn rhoi mwy o fanylion i'r Aelodau am hynny. Un pwynt olaf, os caf, Llywydd, ynglŷn â rheoliadau adeiladu. Mae gennym ni rymoedd i ddiwygio rheoliadau adeiladu yn barod ac mae gennym ni grŵp cynghori rheoliadau adeiladu. Ond, unwaith eto, ni fyddaf yn ceisio diwygio'r rheoliadau adeiladu, neu ni fydd y Gweinidog yn gwneud hynny, oni bai fod gennym dystiolaeth i awgrymu y dylen ni. Y sefyllfa sydd ohoni ar hyn o bryd yw bod yr unedau sydd wedi eu gosod yn cydymffurfio â safonau rheoleiddio adeiladu. Nawr, os ydyn nhw'n anghywir neu os oes angen eu newid, yna byddwn yn cael asesiad llawn, unwaith eto, yn unol â Llywodraeth y DU. Nid yw'r paneli hyn yn lledaenu o Gymru a Lloegr yn unig. Cânt eu defnyddio ar adeiladau ar draws y byd, felly mae'n rhaid i ni fod yn ofalus iawn sut rydym ni'n mynd i'r afael â hyn: nid adwaith mympwyol i newid rheoliadau adeiladu am ei fod yn teimlo'n iawn. Mae'n rhaid i ni seilio hyn ar dystiolaeth gan y panel arbenigol ynglŷn â'r hyn sy'n iawn