techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Leader of the house, the Stay Well in Wales survey highlighted that doctors and nurses are not the primary source of health information, probably due to the difficulty in getting an appointment with a GP or practice nurse. The situation is being made much worse by short-sighted decisions by local government. Bridgend council intend to cut bus subsidies, which put an end to services covering a lot of Porthcawl, making it impossible for some residents to get to the new health centre. What is your Government doing to ensure that local government decisions do not have an impact on people's ability to access health and social care?
Welsh: Arweinydd y tŷ, tynnodd arolwg Cadw'n Iach yng Nghymru sylw at y ffaith nad meddygon a nyrsys yw'r brif ffynhonnell o wybodaeth am iechyd, mae'n debyg oherwydd yr anhawster o gael apwyntiad gyda meddyg teulu neu nyrs practis. Mae'n sefyllfa'n cael ei gwneud yn llawer gwaeth gan benderfyniadau annoeth gan lywodraeth leol. Mae cyngor Pen-y-bont ar Ogwr yn bwriadu torri cymorthdaliadau bysiau, a rhoi terfyn ar wasanaethau sy'n cwmpasu llawer o Borthcawl, gan ei gwneud yn amhosibl i rai trigolion gyrraedd y ganolfan iechyd newydd. Beth mae eich Llywodraeth yn ei wneud i sicrhau nad yw penderfyniadau llywodraeth leol yn effeithio ar allu pobl i gael gafael ar wasanaethau iechyd a gofal cymdeithasol?
English: I think that's really quite a stretch in terms of public health. We have a very good working relationship with all of our local authority partners in this, and, of course, they're responsible for delivering social care as well. And we have a very well-developed bond with them around travel and health travel in particular. That's something that also comes up in the workforce partnership council from time to time as well. So, I can assure the Member that we have a very good working relationship with local authorities and they take into account all of those sorts of decisions in making some of the very difficult decisions they've had to make given the austerity agenda still being pursued by the UK Government.
Welsh: Rwy'n credu bod hynny'n gryn dipyn i'w ofyn o ran iechyd y cyhoedd. Mae gennym ni berthynas waith dda iawn gyda phob un o'n partneriaid awdurdod lleol yn hyn o beth, ac, wrth gwrs, maen nhw'n gyfrifol am ddarparu gofal cymdeithasol hefyd. Ac mae gennym ni gysylltiad sydd wedi ei ddatblygu'n dda iawn gyda nhw o ran teithio a theithio iechyd yn benodol. Mae hynny'n rhywbeth sydd hefyd yn codi yn y cyngor partneriaeth gweithlu o bryd i'w gilydd hefyd. Felly, gallaf sicrhau'r Aelod bod gennym ni berthynas waith dda iawn gydag awdurdodau lleol a'u bod nhw'n cymryd pob un o'r mathau hynny o benderfyniadau i ystyriaeth wrth wneud rhai o'r penderfyniadau anodd iawn y bu'n rhaid iddyn nhw eu gwneud o ystyried yr agenda cyni cyllidol sy'n dal i gael ei dilyn gan Lywodraeth y DU.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. I was encouraged when I heard that the First Minister was leaving the country, in particular because of what he said at the same time, that America was Wales's most important business partner and there are exciting opportunities that lie ahead and he was going to the United States to press the case for developing a free trade agreement between our countries. Unfortunately, the leader of the opposition at Westminster immediately torpedoed those laudable aims by saying that Labour would seek to negotiate a new comprehensive UK-EU customs union, which, as we know from Mr Barnier, would not include any cherry-picking by the UK Government, and, as we'd be out of the EU, of course, we wouldn't have anything more than the right to be consulted. How can these two conflicting positions of the First Minister of Wales and the leader of the opposition at Westminster now be reconciled?
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Fe'm calonogwyd pan glywais fod y Prif Weinidog yn gadael y wlad, yn enwedig oherwydd yr hyn a ddywedodd ar yr un pryd, mai America oedd partner busnes pwysicaf Cymru a bod cyfleoedd cyffrous o'n blaenau, a'r fod yn mynd i'r Unol Daleithiau i ddadlau'r achos dros ddatblygu cytundeb masnach rydd rhwng ein gwledydd. Yn anffodus, cafodd y nodau canmoladwy hynny eu suddo ar unwaith gan arweinydd yr wrthblaid yn San Steffan gan ddweud y byddai Llafur yn ceisio cytuno undeb cynhwysfawr newydd rhwng y DU a'r UE, na fyddai, fel y gwyddom gan Mr Barnier, yn cynnwys unrhyw bosibilrwydd i Lywodraeth y DU ddewis yr agweddau manteisiol, a, chan y byddem ni allan o'r UE, wrth gwrs, ni fyddai gennym ni ddim mwy na'r hawl i gael ein hymgynghori. Sut gellir cysoni'r ddau safbwynt hyn gan Brif Weinidog Cymru ac arweinydd yr wrthblaid yn San Steffan sy'n mynd yn groes i'w gilydd?
English: Well, I don't think they are conflicting at all, because, of course, the First Minister was speaking about the potential for a free trade deal between the UK as a whole and the USA and, as we've explained on numerous previous occasions, in the sort of customs union that we envisage the UK would conduct parallel negotiations with third countries to those undertaken by the EU 27. Our talks with the US and the EU are currently in abeyance. These will undoubtedly come back on to the agenda in the coming years. It's obviously nonsensical to exclude ourselves from one of the most powerful trading blocks in the world on the basis of some dogmatic political belief.
Welsh: Wel, nid wyf i'n credu eu bod nhw'n mynd yn groes i'w gilydd o gwbl, oherwydd, wrth gwrs, roedd y Prif Weinidog yn siarad am y potensial ar gyfer cytundeb masnach rydd rhwng y DU yn ei chyfanrwydd a'r Unol Daleithiau ac, fel rydym ni wedi ei esbonio ar sawl achlysur blaenorol, yn y math o undeb tollau yr ydym ni'n ei ragweld, byddai'r DU yn cynnal trafodaethau cyfochrog â thrydydd gwledydd i'r rheini a gynhelir gan 27 gwlad yr UE. Mae ein trafodaethau â'r Unol Daleithiau a'r UE yn parhau heb eu gorffen ar hyn o bryd. Nid oes amheuaeth y bydd y rhain yn dychwelyd i'r agenda yn y blynyddoedd i ddod. Mae'n amlwg yn hurt i eithrio ein hunain o un o flociau masnachu mwyaf grymus y byd ar sail rhyw gred wleidyddol ddogmatig.
English: It's clearly impossible under EU law for any member state to conduct trade negotiations with a third country, because all that is reserved to the Commission in Brussels, so the Labour Party's position is totally incoherent. But I was also encouraged by what the First Minister said that, 'I want to reassurethe United States that Wales remains an outward looking and welcoming country.' Unfortunately, that laudable statement was also undermined by the shadow foreign secretary at Westminster, Emily Thornbury, who described Mr Trump as an asteroid of awfulness that has fallen on this world. She said, 'I think that he is a danger and I think that he is a racist.' I'm delighted that Welsh Labour's true face is on display today, agreeing with sentiments that can only do damage to the interests of the United Kingdom and the interests of the people of Wales. If the First Minister is serious about wanting to engage the Trump administration and investors from the United States in the possibilities and potential of our country here, then it pays generally in diplomacy to be nice to people rather than to insult and abuse them.
Welsh: Mae'n amhosibl o dan gyfraith yr UE i unrhyw aelod-wladwriaeth gynnal trafodaethau masnach gyda thrydedd gwlad, gan fod hynny i gyd wedi ei gadw yn ôl i'r Comisiwn ym Mrwsel, felly mae safbwynt y Blaid Lafur yn gwbl annealladwy. Ond fe'm calonogwyd hefyd gan yr hyn a ddywedodd y Prif Weinidog, sef Rwyf i eisiau sicrhauyr Unol Daleithiau bod Cymru yn parhau i fod yn wlad agored a chroesawgar. Yn anffodus, tanseiliwyd y datganiad canmoladwy hwnnw hefyd gan ysgrifennydd tramor yr wrthblaid yn San Steffan, Emily Thornbury, a ddisgrifiodd Mr Trump fel asteroid o drybeiligrwydd sydd wedi disgyn ar y byd hwn. Dywedodd, Rwy'n credu ei fod yn beryglus ac rwy'n credu ei fod yn hiliol. Rwy'n falch bod gwir wyneb Llafur Cymru i'w weld heddiw, yn cytuno â theimladau a all wneud dim ond niwed i fuddiannau'r Deyrnas Unedig a buddiannau pobl Cymru. Os yw'r Prif Weinidog o ddifrif ynghylch bod eisiau ymgysylltu â gweinyddiaeth Trump a buddsoddwyr o'r Unol Daleithiau ym mhosibiliadau a photensial ein gwlad yma, yna mae'n talu'n gyffredinol mewn diplomyddiaeth i fod yn gyfeillgar tuag at bobl yn hytrach na'u sarhau a'u dilorni.
English: Well, I'm very glad to hear Neil Hamilton's idea of appeasement, which is not my idea of appeasement. There is a huge difference between the presidency of the United States and the United States as an entire country. The First Minister and the Labour Party have been extremely clear about the position on the customs union. We have made it explicit that it's in Wales's best interest to remain inside the customs union and actually, indeed, inside the single market. The FM could not have been more clear in that regard.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n falch iawn o glywed syniad Neil Hamilton o ddyhuddiad, sy'n wahanol i'm syniad i o ddyhuddiad. Mae gwahaniaeth enfawr rhwng arlywyddiaeth yr Unol Daleithiau a'r Unol Daleithiau fel gwlad gyfan. Mae'r Prif Weinidog a'r Blaid Lafur wedi bod yn hynod eglur ynghylch y safbwynt ar yr undeb tollau. Rydym ni wedi ei gwneud yn eglur mai'r budd gorau i Gymru fyddai aros y tu mewn i'r undeb tollau ac, yn wir, o fewn y farchnad sengl. Ni allai'r Prif Weinidog fod wedi bod yn fwy eglur yn hynny o beth.
English: The leader of UKIP makes his usual nonsensical alignment between two completely different things. Of course, the First Minister is conducting a series of important negotiations with a range of investors right across the United States and Canada, as it happens, in the best interests of this country. Of course, he will be meeting with Hillary Clinton and a range of other people who have an interest in continuing our good relationship.
Welsh: Mae arweinydd UKIP yn gwneud ei gyfatebiaeth ddisynnwyr arferol rhwng dau beth hollol wahanol. Wrth gwrs, mae'r Prif Weinidog yn cynnal cyfres o drafodaethau pwysig gydag amrywiaeth o fuddsoddwyr ar draws yr Unol Daleithiau a Chanada, fel mae'n digwydd, er lles gorau y wlad hon. Wrth gwrs, bydd yn cyfarfod â Hillary Clinton ac amrywiaeth o bobl eraill sydd â diddordeb mewn parhau ein perthynas dda.
English: I think it's very important that we maintain an open mind during the negotiations with the EU and therefore we need to have a customs union of one sort or another. If that turns out to be the customs union as a result of the negotiations, well that would be very interesting, but, in the spirit of a negotiation, of course we have to keep everything on the table.
Welsh: Rwy'n meddwl ei bod hi'n bwysig iawn ein bod ni'n cadw meddwl agored yn ystod y trafodaethau gyda'r UE ac felly mae angen i ni gael undeb tollau o ryw fath neu'i gilydd. Os mai'r undeb tollau a ddaw o ganlyniad i'r trafodaethau fydd hwnnw, yna byddai hynny'n ddiddorol iawn, ond, yn ysbryd trafodaeth, wrth gwrs, mae'n rhaid i ni gadw popeth ar y bwrdd.
English: I'm afraid to say that's a regression from the position taken by this Government some months ago. The joint White Paper 'Securing Wales' Future' concludes that Wales and the UK should remain in the EU customs union, and I quote: 'we' - that's you and us - 'are unconvinced that the possible benefits of withdrawing from the EU Customs Union outweigh the costs.' In fact, every single reference to 'customs union' in Government policy since is to the existing customs union. There's not a single reference to a new, as yet non-existent type of customs union. So why, I ask, has the First Minister changed his tone or changed his language? Why does he now talk about 'a' customs union, as do you? Is it because the position as outlined by Jeremy Corbyn is at odds with what's in the interests of Wales and the people of Wales, and for want of a better term, the First Minister is therefore having to fudge it?
Welsh: Mae'n ddrwg gen i ddweud bod hynna'n dynnu'n ôl o'r safbwynt a gymerwyd gan y Llywodraeth hon rai misoedd yn ôl. Mae'r Papur Gwyn ar y cyd 'Sicrhau Dyfodol Cymru' yn dod i'r casgliad y dylai Cymru a'r DU aros yn undeb tollau'r UE, a dyfynnaf: 'nid ydym' - sef chi a ni - 'wedi ein hargyhoeddi bod manteision posibl tynnu yn ôl o Undeb Tollau'r UE yn fwy na'r costau.' A dweud y gwir, mae pob un cyfeiriad at 'undeb tollau' ym mholisi'r Llywodraeth ers hynny at yr undeb tollau presennol. Nid oes unrhyw gyfeiriad at fath newydd o undeb tollau, nad yw'n bodoli eto. Felly pam, gofynnaf, mae'r Prif Weinidog wedi newid ei dôn neu wedi newid ei iaith? Pam mae'n sôn nawr am undeb tollau o ryw fath, fel yr ydych chithau? Mae oherwydd bod y safbwynt a amlinellwyd gan Jeremy Corbyn yn groes i'r hyn sydd er lles Cymru a phobl Cymru, ac yn absenoldeb term gwell, mae'r Prif Weinidog yn gorfod cymylu pethau?
English: No, I disagree entirely. I think it's a very sensible point to make that we need to be in a position to negotiate the very best possible deal for Wales and for the UK as a whole, as part of these negotiations in leaving the European Union. Therefore, we need to try and negotiate the best possible deal. I personally think that the best possible deal is the current state of play. I'm a remainer, I make no bones about it. But clearly, in a negotiation, we need to get the best deal, and a negotiation is a two-way street, and we have to see what's on the table from the other side and what their negotiation stance is. So, it would be ridiculous to rule out all other options.
Welsh: Na, rwy'n anghytuno'n llwyr. Rwy'n credu ei fod yn bwynt synhwyrol iawn i'w wneud bod angen i ni fod mewn sefyllfa i sicrhau'r cytundeb gorau posibl i Gymru a'r DU yn ei chyfanrwydd, yn rhan o'r trafodaethau hyn wrth adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd. Felly, mae angen i ni geisio cael y cytundeb gorau posibl. Rwy'n meddwl yn bersonol mai'r cytundeb gorau posibl yw'r sefyllfa fel y mae hi ar hyn o bryd. Rwyf i o blaid aros, ac rwy'n gwbl agored am hynny. Ond yn amlwg, mewn trafodaeth, mae angen i ni gael y cytundeb gorau, ac mae trafodaeth yn stryd ddwyffordd, ac mae'n rhaid i ni weld beth sydd ar y bwrdd gan yr ochr arall a beth yw eu safbwynt trafod. Felly, byddai'n wirion diystyru pob dewis arall.
English: But what I don't understand is if you were happy as a Government to set out with us what our position was when this document was published, why is that still not the case now? I want to work together on this. I'm really proud that through the work that's been done by Steffan Lewis more than anybody on our side - it's good to see Steffan with us today - we have been able to bring Government towards us on some of these core issues, and will continue to try to do so. Now, apart from the customs union issue, I think Jeremy Corbyn's Labour position has another fundamental error, in that he is committed to pulling out of the single market. He wants to pick and choose aspects of that market, but President Tusk, as we know, has said that there can be no cherry picking, and no single market à la carte. The solution is that we need both: customs union and single market. Jobs in Wales need both customs union and single market. The port of Holyhead in my constituency, our constituents, all of us, need both. It feels as if, at every corner, the Welsh position is being undermined and undercut by the whims of Westminster, and by that I mean the whims of Government and opposition at Westminster. You know that the position I have set out, that Plaid Cymru has set out, makes sense. Will you help us deliver it?
Welsh: Ond yr hyn nad wyf i'n ei ddeall yw os oeddech chi'n hapus fel Llywodraeth i gyflwyno gyda ni beth oedd ein safbwynt pan gyhoeddwyd y ddogfen hon, pam nad yw hynny'n dal i fod yn wir nawr? Rwyf i eisiau cydweithio ar hyn. Rwy'n falch iawn ein bod ni wedi gallu, drwy'r gwaith a wnaed gan Steffan Lewis yn fwy na neb ar ein hochr ni - mae'n braf gweld Steffan gyda ni heddiw - dod â'r Llywodraeth tuag atom ni ar rai o'r materion craidd hyn, a bydd yn parhau i geisio gwneud hynny. Nawr, ar wahân i fater yr undeb tollau, rwy'n credu bod gwall sylfaenol arall yn safbwynt Llafur Jeremy Corbyn, sef ei fod wedi ymrwymo i dynnu allan o'r farchnad sengl. Mae eisiau dewis a dethol agweddau ar y farchnad honno, ond mae'r Llywydd Tusk, fel y gwyddom, wedi dweud na ellir dewis a dethol, nac unrhyw farchnad sengl à la carte. Yr ateb yw bod angen y ddau arnom ni: undeb tollau a marchnad sengl. Mae swyddi yng Nghymru angen undeb tollau a marchnad sengl. Mae porthladd Caergybi yn fy etholaeth i, ein hetholwyr, pob un ohonom ni, angen y ddau. Mae'n teimlo fel pe byddai safbwynt Cymru yn cael ei danseilio a'i dandorri ar bob cornel gan fympwyon San Steffan, a thrwy hynny rwy'n golygu mympwy'r Llywodraeth a'r wrthblaid yn San Steffan. Rydych chi'n gwybod bod y safbwynt yr wyf i wedi ei gyflwyno, y mae Plaid Cymru wedi ei gyflwyno, yn gwneud synnwyr. A wnewch chi ein helpu ni i'w gyflawni?
English: We've been very clear as a Welsh Government, and indeed, in co-operation with Plaid Cymru, about the very best possible outcome for Wales, and we're still very clear about that. But I reiterate what I said: this is a negotiation. It is about getting the best out of the negotiation overall. So, if you rule everything out except the position you start from, that's not a negotiation, and you're very likely to fail. So, I think it's a very sensible thing to have a range of options on the table that you can start the negotiations with. It remains to be seen where the negotiations will end up. I personally still believe that staying inside the European Union as a whole is the best option for Wales. That's not something the people voted for, and we're in a position of having to negotiate the best deal we can short of that.
Welsh: Rydym ni wedi bod yn eglur iawn fel Llywodraeth Cymru, ac yn wir, mewn cydweithrediad â Phlaid Cymru, am y canlyniad gorau posibl i Gymru, ac rydym ni'n dal i fod yn eglur iawn am hynny. Ond ailadroddaf yr hyn a ddywedais: trafodaeth yw hon. Mae'n golygu cael y gorau allan o'r drafodaeth yn gyffredinol. Felly, os ydych chi'n diystyru popeth ac eithrio'r safbwynt yr ydych chi'n cychwyn ohono, nid yw honno'n drafodaeth, ac rydych chi'n debygol iawn o fethu. Felly, rwy'n credu ei fod yn beth synhwyrol iawn cael amrywiaeth o ddewisiadau ar y bwrdd y gallwch chi ddechrau'r trafodaethau â nhw. Mae'n rhaid aros i weld beth fydd canlyniadau'r trafodaethau yn y pen draw. Rwyf i'n bersonol yn dal i gredu mai aros y tu mewn i'r Undeb Ewropeaidd yn ei gyfanrwydd yw'r dewis gorau i Gymru. Nid yw hynny'n rhywbeth y gwnaeth y bobl bleidleisio drosto, ac rydym ni mewn sefyllfa o orfod sicrhau'r cytundeb gorau y gallwn hyd at hynny.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. Leader of the house, just before we started today, a letter came from the Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Transport highlighting the Government's intention to have a vote on the M4 relief road, and I welcome that movement on behalf of the Government. In the letter - it's three paragraphs long, so it's not particularly long - it indicates that the Cabinet Secretary is seeking legal advice as to the timing of the debate. So, I'm assuming that the Government have set their mind on what type of debate you will be bringing forward for Members to vote on. Will it a 'to note' debate, will it be a budget vote or will it be a more substantive vote around the inquiry itself? Because as I said, the letter clearly indicates it's more of a timing issue, and the Government is quite clear as to the type and nature of debate that we will be able to vote on. I'd be grateful for some clarity on that particular issue.
Welsh: Diolch, Llywydd. Arweinydd y tŷ, cyn i ni ddechrau heddiw, daeth llythyr oddi wrth Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros yr Economi a Thrafnidiaeth yn tynnu sylw at fwriad y Llywodraeth i gael pleidlais ar ffordd liniaru'r M4, ac rwy'n croesawu'r cam hwnnw ar ran y Llywodraeth. Yn y llythyr - mae'n dri pharagraff o hyd, felly nid yw'n arbennig o hir - mae'n dynodi bod Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn ceisio cyngor cyfreithiol ynghylch amseriad y ddadl. Felly, rwy'n tybio bod y Llywodraeth wedi penderfynu pa fath o ddadl y byddwch chi'n ei chyflwyno i'r Aelodau bleidleisio arni. A fydd hi'n ddadl 'i nodi', a fydd hi'n bleidlais gyllideb neu a fydd hi'n bleidlais mwy sylweddol yn ymwneud â'r ymchwiliad ei hun? Oherwydd fel y dywedais, mae'r llythyr yn nodi'n eglur ei fod yn fwy o fater o amseru, ac mae'r Llywodraeth yn gwbl eglur ynghylch math a natur y ddadl y byddwn yn gallu pleidleisio arni. Byddwn yn ddiolchgar am rywfaint o eglurder ynghylch y mater penodol hwnnw.
English: Well, yes, as I said earlier on in answer to the question, we've confirmed we'll bring forward the debate in Government time on the M4 corridor around Newport, following the conclusion of the public local inquiry. The debate is likely to be a 'to note' debate at this point in time, but I'm hesitant to say that categorically because we don't yet know the outcome of the public inquiry. So, until we know the outcome, we don't really know what we can form the debate around. So, I'm prepared at this point to give an indication, but I can't be categoric about it because, until we know the outcome of the public inquiry, we are not in a position to be categoric about it.
Welsh: Wel, ie, fel y dywedais yn gynharach wrth ateb y cwestiwn, rydym ni wedi ein cadarnhau y byddwn ni'n cyflwyno'r ddadl yn amser y Llywodraeth ar goridor yr M4 o amgylch Casnewydd, ar ôl i'r ymchwiliad lleol cyhoeddus ddod i ben. Mae'r ddadl yn debygol o fod yn ddadl 'i nodi' ar hyn o bryd, ond rwy'n amharod i ddweud hynny'n bendant gan nad ydym ni'n gwybod canlyniad yr ymchwiliad cyhoeddus eto. Felly, tan y byddwn ni'n gwybod y canlyniad, nid ydym ni wir yn gwybod beth y gallwn ni seilio'r ddadl arno. Felly, rwy'n barod ar hyn o bryd i roi awgrym, ond ni allaf fod yn bendant am y peth oherwydd, tan y byddwn ni'n gwybod canlyniad yr ymchwiliad cyhoeddus, nid ydym mewn sefyllfa i fod yn bendant amdano.
English: In fairness, I'm basing my questions on the letter, obviously, and the letter indicates that the Government has set its mind on the type of debate we'll be voting on. It doesn't tie into the public inquiry, it talks more about the timings of the debate based on legal advice. But, you do indicate that it doesn't seem as if it's in the Government's mind at the moment to bring forward a budget vote or an allocation of resources to this project. As you said earlier, it is a 'to note'. Because there's quite a difference, there is, for Members to vote on. Given this is the largest capital project that the Welsh Government will be bringing forward, I think it's important for us to understand exactly what the Government is proposing. So, can I just be crystal clear: you are at the moment minded that that vote will be a 'to note' vote?
Welsh: A bod yn deg, rwy'n seilio fy nghwestiynau ar y llythyr, yn amlwg, ac mae'r llythyr yn nodi bod y Llywodraeth wedi penderfynu ar y math o ddadl y byddwn ni'n pleidleisio arni. Nid yw'n gysylltiedig â'r ymchwiliad cyhoeddus, mae'n sôn mwy am amseroedd y ddadl yn seiliedig ar gyngor cyfreithiol. Ond, rydych chi'n nodi nad yw'n ymddangos fel pe byddai'r Llywodraeth yn ystyried cyflwyno pleidlais gyllideb neu ddyraniad o adnoddau i'r prosiect hwn ar hyn o bryd. Fel y dywedasoch yn gynharach, mae ddadl 'i nodi'. Oherwydd mae cryn wahaniaeth, oes, i'r Aelodau bleidleisio arno. O gofio mai dyma'r prosiect cyfalaf mwyaf y bydd Llywodraeth Cymru yn ei gyflwyno, rwy'n credu ei bod yn bwysig i ni ddeall yn union beth mae'r Llywodraeth yn ei gynnig. Felly, a gaf i fod yn gwbl eglur: rydych chi wedi penderfynu ar hyn o bryd mai pleidlais 'i nodi' fydd y bleidlais hon?