English: Can I call for two statements? Firstly, on the INTERREG Ireland-Wales 2014-20 programme, which, as you know, encourages regions to work together to address common economic, environmental and social challenges. In Wales, the two INTERREG regions are north Wales, with a population of just over 696,000, and west Wales, with 630,000 - so, not dissimilar populations. But I've been given a freedom of information response from the Welsh European Funding Office, which says that there were 62 projects submitted but only 19 of these involved a north Wales partner, and only 12 were led by an organisation based in Wales. And, of 18 projects approved, only five had a north Wales partner - sorry, included a north Wales partner - and only two were led by a north Wales partner. So, only 28 per cent of projects approved included a partner in north Wales; only 11 per cent led by a north Wales partner. I call for a statement to reflect concern raised with me - it isn't my concern, although I do have concern if the answer is the wrong answer - that potential INTERREG projects have not necessarily received the support and engagement in north Wales that they have elsewhere, because I know that demand in north Wales, potentially, should be equal at least to that in west Wales. Secondly, could I call for a Welsh Government statement on its developing revised policy on fuel poverty in light of two new reports? A report on 3 October from the Auditor General for Wales said that the number of households in fuel poverty in Wales had fallen since 2008, but the Welsh Government had missed its targets. It said that the causes of fuel poverty are complex, that Welsh Government have spent £249 million on its Warm Homes programme to reduce fuel poverty, but identified tensions between trying to eradicate carbon emissions from domestic housing and prioritising efforts and funding on fuel-poor households, which tend to use less energy, and made a series of recommendations to the Welsh Government, including lessons learnt from the failure to meet the current targets set in 2010, linking fuel poverty schemes with other work to tackle the underlying cause of fuel poverty, and considering how fuel poverty schemes could prevent costs in other service areas and contribute to wider policy goals. And, secondly, in this context, the report on 7 October from the Bevan Foundation, which said that, although the Welsh Government had made some progress in reducing fuel poverty over the last decade, it noted that the richest households had benefited most. In 2008, of the 70 per cent richest households, over 83,000 were estimated to be living in fuel poverty, and that that's now 75 per cent lower, whereas the bottom 10 tenth, poorest, households have only seen a drop of 25 per cent. So, we now have only 21,000 of the richest households and 92,000 of the poorest households, perhaps, as they said, providing 'an indication as to why the Welsh Government has failed in its target to eradicate fuel poverty', and proposing that, in future, the fuel poverty targets should instead be focused on the poorest households rather than simply across the piste. I call for a statement accordingly.
Welsh: A gaf i alw am ddau ddatganiad? Yn gyntaf, ynghylch y rhaglen INTERREG Iwerddon-Cymru 2014-20, sydd, fel y gwyddoch, yn annog rhanbarthau i gydweithio i fynd i'r afael â heriau economaidd, amgylcheddol a chymdeithasol cyffredin. Yng Nghymru, y ddau ranbarth INTERREG yw gogledd Cymru, gyda phoblogaeth o ychydig dros 696,000, a gorllewin Cymru, gyda 630,000 - felly, nid poblogaethau annhebyg. Ond rwyf wedi cael ymateb rhyddid gwybodaeth gan Swyddfa Cyllid Ewropeaidd Cymru, sy'n dweud bod 62 o brosiectau wedi'u cyflwyno, ond dim ond 19 o'r rhain oedd yn cynnwys partner o Ogledd Cymru, a dim ond 12 a arweiniwyd gan sefydliad yng Nghymru. Ac, o blith 18 o brosiectau a gymeradwywyd, dim ond pump oedd â phartner yng ngogledd Cymru - mae'n ddrwg gennyf, a oedd yn cynnwys partner o'r gogledd - a dim ond dau oedd yn cael eu harwain gan bartner yng ngogledd Cymru. Felly, dim ond 28 y cant o'r prosiectau a gymeradwywyd oedd yn cynnwys partner yng ngogledd Cymru; dim ond 11 y cant a arweiniwyd gan bartner yng ngogledd Cymru. Galwaf am ddatganiad i adlewyrchu'r pryder a godwyd gyda mi - nid fy mhryder i ydyw, er fy mod yn pryderu os yw'r ateb yn ateb anghywir - nad yw prosiectau posibl o dan INTERREG o reidrwydd wedi cael y cymorth a'r ymrwymiad yn y gogledd sydd ganddynt mewn mannau eraill, oherwydd gwn y dylai'r galw yn y gogledd, o bosibl, fod yr un fath o leiaf ag y mae yng ngorllewin Cymru. Yn ail, a gaf i alw am ddatganiad gan Lywodraeth Cymru am y modd y mae'n datblygu polisi diwygiedig ar dlodi tanwydd yng ngoleuni dau adroddiad newydd? Dywedodd adroddiad ar 3 Hydref gan Archwilydd Cyffredinol Cymru fod nifer yr aelwydydd mewn tlodi tanwydd yng Nghymru wedi gostwng ers 2008, ond bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi methu ei thargedau. Dywedodd fod achosion tlodi tanwydd yn gymhleth, bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gwario £249 miliwn ar ei rhaglen cartrefi clyd i leihau tlodi tanwydd, ond wedi nodi tensiynau rhwng ceisio dileu allyriadau carbon o dai domestig a blaenoriaethu ymdrechion a chyllid ar aelwydydd tanwydd-dlawd, sy'n tueddu i ddefnyddio llai o ynni. Hefyd gwnaed cyfres o argymhellion i Lywodraeth Cymru, gan gynnwys gwersi a ddysgwyd o'r methiant i gyrraedd y targedau presennol a osodwyd yn 2010, gan gysylltu cynlluniau tlodi tanwydd â gwaith arall i fynd i'r afael ag achos gwaelodol tlodi tanwydd, ac ystyried sut y gallai cynlluniau tlodi tanwydd atal costau mewn meysydd gwasanaeth eraill a chyfrannu at nodau polisi ehangach. Ac, yn ail, yn y cyd-destun hwn, yr adroddiad ar 7 Hydref gan Sefydliad Bevan, a ddywedodd, er bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gwneud rhywfaint o gynnydd o ran lleihau tlodi tanwydd dros y ddegawd ddiwethaf, nododd mai'r aelwydydd cyfoethocaf oedd wedi elwa fwyaf. Yn 2008, o'r 70 y cant o aelwydydd cyfoethocaf, amcangyfrifwyd bod dros 83,000 yn byw mewn tlodi tanwydd, a bod hynny bellach 75 y cant yn is, tra mai dim ond 25 y cant o ostyngiad a welwyd yng ngwaelod y 10 degfed, y tlotaf, o gartrefi. Felly, erbyn hyn dim ond 21,000 o'r aelwydydd cyfoethocaf a 92,000 o'r aelwydydd tlotaf sydd, fel y dywedasant, yn darparu arwydd o'r rheswm pam mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi methu yn ei tharged i ddileu tlodi tanwydd, ac yn cynnig, yn y dyfodol, y dylid canolbwyntio'r targedau tlodi tanwydd ar yr aelwydydd tlotaf yn hytrach nag yn gyffredinol. Galwaf am ddatganiad yn unol â hynny.