techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: It's absolutely correct to say that we need to look at holistic approaches to helping people when they feel depressed and when they feel isolated, and the Member's right to point that out. I can say that the Welsh Government is providing £180,000 over the next three years to help develop volunteer-led networks that support lonely and isolated people within communities, similar to the scheme that she's already mentioned.
Welsh: Mae'n gwbl gywir i ddweud bod angen i ni edrych ar ddulliau cyfannol i helpu pobl pan fyddan nhw'n teimlo'n isel a phan fyddan nhw'n teimlo'n ynysig, ac mae'r Aelod yn iawn i dynnu sylw at hynny. Gallaf ddweud bod Llywodraeth Cymru yn darparu £180,000 dros y tair blynedd nesaf i helpu i ddatblygu rhwydweithiau a arweinir gan wirfoddolwyr sy'n cynorthwyo pobl unig ac ynysig mewn cymunedau, yn debyg i'r cynllun y mae hi wedi ei grybwyll eisoes.
English: First Minister, as you're aware, social prescribing is highly dependent on the third sector, the community organisations and voluntary groups. However, many rural communities have faced consistent downgrading of community assets and the support networks. How will the Welsh Government, the health boards, and local government work effectively together to ensure that community assets are in place? A brief example is the threatened closure of the Avenue Centre in Tenby, which was being threatened with closure under the terms of the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014. That's what the local government tried to do. If you take that kind of asset away, then social prescribing, which we utterly support and think is an excellent way forward, is really going to struggle to be delivered on the ground specifically in rural communities. So, how are you going to tie all this together to make sure -
Welsh: Brif Weinidog, fel y gwyddoch, mae rhagnodi cymdeithasol yn dibynnu'n helaeth ar y trydydd sector, y mudiadau cymunedol a grwpiau gwirfoddol. Fodd bynnag, mae llawer o gymunedau gwledig wedi wynebu israddio cyson o asedau cymunedol a'r rhwydweithiau cymorth. Sut gwnaiff Llywodraeth Cymru, y byrddau iechyd, a llywodraeth leol weithio'n effeithiol gyda'i gilydd i sicrhau bod asedau cymunedol ar gael? Enghraifft gryno yw'r bygythiad i gau Canolfan Avenue yn Ninbych-y-pysgod, yr oedd bygythiad i'w chau o dan delerau Deddf Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol a Llesiant (Cymru) 2014. Dyna beth geisiodd llywodraeth leol ei wneud. Os cymerwch chi'r math hwnnw o ased oddi wrth pobl, yna mae rhagnodi cymdeithasol, yr ydym ni'n ei gefnogi'n llwyr ac yn credu sy'n ffordd ragorol ymlaen, wir yn mynd i gael trafferth i gael ei ddarparu ar lawr gwlad, yn enwedig mewn cymunedau gwledig. Felly, sut ydych chi'n mynd i dynnu hyn i gyd at ei gilydd i wneud yn siŵr -
English: You've asked your question. First Minister.
Welsh: Rydych chi wedi gofyn eich cwestiwn. Brif Weinidog.
English: It's absolutely right that good communication between health and community services will be crucial for the networks to be developed and established in order to spend the money that I referred to earlier wisely. We did launch our new three-year delivery plan for our mental health strategy, 'Together for Mental Health', yesterday, and the social prescribing pilot included in the delivery plan will also complement that action. I would hope then that local government can learn from the delivery plan and implement best practice in their areas.
Welsh: Mae'n gwbl gywir y bydd cyfathrebu da rhwng gwasanaethau iechyd a chymunedol yn hanfodol i'r rhwydweithiau gael eu datblygu a'u sefydlu er mwyn gwario'r arian y cyfeiriais ato'n gynharach yn ddoeth. Fe wnaethom ni lansio ein cynllun cyflawni tair blynedd newydd ar gyfer ein strategaeth iechyd meddwl, 'Law yn Llaw at Iechyd Meddwl', ddoe, a bydd y cynllun rhagbrofol rhagnodi cymdeithasol a gafodd ei gynnwys yn y cynllun cyflawni hefyd yn ategu'r camau hynny. Byddwn yn gobeithio wedyn y gall llywodraeth leol ddysgu o'r cynllun cyflawni a chyflwyno arfer gorau yn eu hardaloedd.
English: Questions now from the party leaders, and I first of all call the leader of the Welsh Conservatives, Andrew R.T. Davies.
Welsh: Cwestiynau yn awr gan arweinwyr y pleidiau. Rwy'n galw yn gyntaf yr wythnos yma arweinydd y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig, Andrew R.T. Davies.
English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. First Minister, I ask these series of questions as a supporter of alleviating the traffic congestion around Newport. But, last week's announcement was bitterly disappointing, in connection to the potential delay of finding a solution around the traffic problems in that part of Wales. There was a clear letter issued last week to a Member in the Assembly here, which highlighted how the Welsh Government had interacted at various workshops, consultations, and, indeed, the change in methodology had been highlighted as early as 2014 and confirmed in workshops in March 2015, and then brought forward in July 2016. Why did it come as such a shock to the Welsh Government that this methodology was changing and, ultimately, could potentially delay the advancement of the project?
Welsh: Diolch i chi, Lywydd. Brif Weinidog, rwy'n gofyn y gyfres hon o gwestiynau fel cefnogwr o leddfu'r tagfeydd traffig o amgylch Casnewydd. Ond, roedd cyhoeddiad yr wythnos diwethaf yn hynod siomedig, o ran yr oedi posibl cyn dod o hyd i ateb i'r problemau traffig yn y rhan honno o Gymru. Cyflwynwyd llythyr eglur i Aelod yn y Cynulliad yma yr wythnos diwethaf, a oedd yn amlygu sut yr oedd Llywodraeth Cymru wedi rhyngweithio mewn gwahanol weithdai, ymgynghoriadau, ac, yn wir, amlygwyd y newid methodoleg mor gynnar â 2014, ac fe'i cadarnhawyd mewn gweithdai ym mis Mawrth 2015, cyn ei gyflawni ym mis Gorffennaf 2016. Pam roedd o'n gymaint o syndod i Lywodraeth Cymru bod y fethodoleg hon yn newid ac y gallai, yn y pen draw, oedi datblygiad y prosiect?
English: Thank you for that very detailed answer, First Minister. I don't think there's very much curiosity around any of this. We have been highlighting for the last 12 months that the methodology did need to be revisited so that the blue and black route could be evaluated on the same methodology, so that, ultimately, the two routes could be compared favourably, and that you could take forward either the blue or the black route. The Welsh Government solution to the traffic crisis around south-east Wales - because it is a crisis; the logjam on the M4 at certain times of the day can stretch back over 12 miles - is to favour the black route. So, can you commit to having a traffic solution in place by 2021 so that people can have confidence that your manifesto commitment to deliver that solution will be met by 2021?
Welsh: Diolch i chi am yr ateb manwl iawn yna, Brif Weinidog. Nid wyf yn credu bod llawer sy'n rhyfedd am unrhyw ran o hyn. Rydym ni wedi bod yn dweud dros y flwyddyn ddiwethaf bod angen ailystyried y fethodoleg fel y gellid gwerthuso'r llwybr glas a du ar sail yr un fethodoleg, fel y gellid, yn y pen draw, cymharu'r ddau lwybr yn ffafriol, ac y gallech fwrw ymlaen â'r llwybr glas neu'r llwybr du. Ateb Llywodraeth Cymru i'r argyfwng traffig o gwmpas y de-ddwyrain - oherwydd mae yn argyfwng; gall y dagfa ar yr M4 ar adegau penodol o'r dydd ymestyn yn ôl dros 12 milltir - yw ffafrio'r llwybr du. Felly, a allwch chi ymrwymo i gael ateb traffig ar waith erbyn 2021 fel y gall pobl fod yn hyderus y bydd yr ymrwymiad yn eich maniffesto i ddarparu'r ateb hwnnw yn cael ei fodloni erbyn 2021?
English: Yes, that is the aim, but it is not helpful when we have Government departments in Whitehall that are acting in this way. They knew that there was a public inquiry that would begin in the autumn of this year, and yet this data was - we had to ask for it, we had to ask for it; it wasn't even provided, and we were not notified that it even existed. And then, of course, officials worked very hard through August to look at the data, to see what it would mean for Welsh road schemes. It's not just Wales that's affected; it's everywhere outside the south-east of England that is adversely affected by this data. So, as far as the Department for Transport are concerned, I would urge them to revisit this data, to have a proper process, where data is published in draft and then opportunity is given to examine that data, to examine its robustness, rather than adopt the strange and unusual approach that they've adopted so far.
Welsh: Gallaf, dyna'r nod, ond nid yw o gymorth pan fo gennym ni adrannau Llywodraeth yn Whitehall sy'n ymddwyn fel hyn. Roedden nhw'n gwybod bod ymchwiliad cyhoeddus a fyddai'n dechrau yn ystod hydref eleni, ac eto ni chafodd y data hyn - bu'n rhaid i ni ofyn amdanynt, bu'n rhaid i ni ofyn amdanynt; ni chawsant eu darparu hyd yn oed, ac ni chawsom ein hysbysu eu bod yn bodoli hyd yn oed. Ac yna, wrth gwrs, gweithiodd swyddogion yn galed iawn trwy fis Awst i edrych ar y data, i weld beth y byddent yn ei olygu i gynlluniau ffyrdd Cymru. Nid dim ond Cymru yr effeithir arni; mae pob man y tu allan i dde-ddwyrain Lloegr yn cael ei effeithio'n andwyol gan y data hyn. Felly, cyn belled ag y mae'r Adran Drafnidiaeth yn y cwestiwn, byddwn yn ei hannog i ailystyried y data hyn, i gael proses briodol, lle cyhoeddir data ar ffurf drafft ac y rhoddir cyfle wedyn i archwilio'r data hynny, i archwilio eu cadernid, yn hytrach na mabwysiadu'r dull rhyfedd ac anarferol y mae wedi ei fabwysiadu hyd yn hyn.
English: Well, I disagree with you about the strange and unusual process. I mean, as I've highlighted, this process has been going on for two years, clearly identified that, in 2016, this change would be coming down the road at you and, obviously, your Government didn't respond. Traffic Scotland were involved in the negotiations and the Northern Ireland Department for Infrastructure were negotiating with the Department for Transport. They're all on this letter and identified as participants in the workshops and the consultation. But what is important is that we do find a solution to the traffic gridlock that exists in south-east Wales. Your Government has put its colours firmly on the mast of the black route, and you're actually on record as saying that if you did support the blue route you could 'kiss goodbye to winning elections in Newport for a generation.' So, is it winning elections that's driving the decisions around the traffic gridlock and the solutions to solve that gridlock or are you actually looking at what the best solution is both financially and in terms of dealing with traffic projections going forward, First Minister?
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n anghytuno â chi am y broses ryfedd ac anarferol. Hynny yw, fel yr wyf i wedi dweud, mae'r broses hon wedi bod ar waith ers dwy flynedd, a nodwyd yn eglur, yn 2016, y byddai'r newid hwn yn dod yn ddiweddarach i chi ac, yn amlwg, ni wnaeth eich Llywodraeth ymateb. Roedd Traffic Scotland yn rhan o'r trafodaethau ac roedd Adran Seilwaith Gogledd Iwerddon mewn trafodaethau gyda'r Adran Drafnidiaeth. Maen nhw i gyd ar y llythyr hwn ac yn cael eu nodi fel cyfranogwyr yn y gweithdai a'r ymgynghoriad. Ond yr hyn sy'n bwysig yw ein bod yn dod o hyd i ateb i'r tagfeydd traffig sy'n bodoli yn ne-ddwyrain Cymru. Mae eich Llywodraeth wedi mynegi ei dewis o'r llwybr du yn eglur, ac rydych chithau wedi dweud ar goedd pe byddech chi'n cefnogi'r llwybr glas y gallech chi anghofio am ennill etholiadau yng Nghasnewydd am genhedlaeth. Felly, ai ennill etholiadau yw sail y penderfyniadau ynghylch y tagfeydd traffig a'r atebion i ddatrys y tagfeydd hynny neu a ydych chi wir yn ystyried beth yw'r ateb gorau yn ariannol ac o ran ymdrin ag amcanestyniadau traffig yn y dyfodol, Brif Weinidog?
English: Diolch, Lywydd. First Minister, the UK Home Secretary last week announced plans to force companies to publish lists of their foreign workers - a regressive step, I'm sure you'll agree with me. It's not clear exactly how this information was intended to be used, but I'm concerned that it could have led us down a very dark path indeed. Since then, the UK Government has rowed back on that position, after a public outcry, but the data are still going to be gathered and there remain questions to be asked about what will happen to that data. Can you prevent any of these measures taking place in Wales?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Brif Weinidog, cyhoeddodd Ysgrifennydd Cartref y DU gynlluniau yr wythnos diwethaf i orfodi cwmnïau i gyhoeddi rhestrau o'u gweithwyr tramor - cam at yn ôl, rwy'n siŵr y byddwch yn cytuno â mi. Nid yw'n eglur sut yn union y bwriedir defnyddio'r wybodaeth hon, ond rwy'n pryderu y gallai fod wedi ein tywys i lawr llwybr tywyll iawn yn wir. Ers hynny, mae Llywodraeth y DU wedi camu yn ôl o'r safbwynt hwnnw, yn dilyn protestiadau'r cyhoedd, ond bydd y data yn dal i gael eu casglu mae cwestiynau i'w gofyn o hyd am yr hyn a fydd yn digwydd i'r data hynny. A allwch chi atal unrhyw un o'r mesurau hyn rhag digwydd yng Nghymru?
English: Well, I think the word that's now being used is 'nudge'. They want to nudge companies in that direction. What I can say is that as far as we are concerned as a Government, we're not going to do that, nor are any of the bodies that we sponsor. At the end of the day, it's a matter for companies who they employ. I don't think it's helpful to have lists of people that would be used against those businesses for many, many reasons: firstly, because of what I think is the sinister side of it, which is to suggest that if people are not UK passport holders then they are in some way imposters in the jobs that they hold, which is the message that it would actually convey; and secondly, I can think of no more powerful disincentive to an investor than an investor being told, 'If you come to Wales or come to the UK, you'll have to tell us how many workers from outside the UK that you will employ'. They don't have to do that in other countries, and that's another barrier to investment as far as Wales is concerned. Like me, I know that she shared the same view very quickly and very publicly when the announcement was made. I do not think that creating lists of people from outside the UK with a view to using those people against the companies who employ them is the right way forward for Wales or Britain.
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n credu mai 'hwb' yw'r gair sy'n cael ei ddefnyddio nawr. Maen nhw'n awyddus i roi hwb i gwmnïau i'r cyfeiriad hwnnw. Yr hyn y gallaf ei ddweud cyn belled ag yr ydym ni yn y cwestiwn fel Llywodraeth, yw nad ydym ni'n mynd i wneud hynny, ac ni fydd unrhyw un o'r cyrff yr ydym ni'n eu noddi yn gwneud hynny ychwaith. Yn y pen draw, mater i gwmnïau yw pwy maen nhw'n eu cyflogi. Nid wyf yn credu ei bod yn ddefnyddiol cael rhestrau o bobl a fyddai'n cael eu defnyddio yn erbyn y busnesau hynny am lawer iawn o resymau: yn gyntaf, oherwydd yr hyn yr wyf yn credu yw ochr sinistr y mater, sef awgrymu os nad oes gan bobl basbort y DU, yna eu bod nhw rywsut yn dwyllwyr yn y swyddi sydd ganddynt, sef y neges y byddai'n ei chyfleu mewn gwirionedd; ac yn ail, ni allaf feddwl am unrhyw wrthanogaeth mwy pwerus i fuddsoddwr na dweud wrtho, 'Os byddwch chi'n dod i Gymru, neu'n dod i'r DU, bydd yn rhaid i chi ddweud wrthym faint o weithwyr o'r tu allan i'r DU y byddwch yn eu cyflogi '. Nid oes rhaid iddynt wneud hynny mewn gwledydd eraill, ac mae hynny'n rhwystr arall i fuddsoddiad cyn belled ag y mae Cymru yn y cwestiwn. Fel finnau, gwn iddi rannu'r un farn yn gyflym iawn ac yn gyhoeddus iawn pan wnaed y cyhoeddiad. Nid wyf yn credu mai creu rhestrau o bobl o'r tu allan i'r DU gyda'r nod o ddefnyddio'r bobl hynny yn erbyn y cwmnïau sy'n eu cyflogi yw'r ffordd iawn ymlaen i Gymru nac i Brydain.
English: Thank you for answer, First Minister. I very much welcome the sentiment that you've conveyed there. Many of our problems in Wales don't stem from certain people moving in to the country but they stem from the fact that many of our young people move out and don't return, and this is especially true of graduates, where we have a lower retention rate than any other UK nation. There's been a lot of focus on immigration, particularly around the debate on Brexit, yet very little attention has been given to out-migration. Plaid Cymru believes that graduates should be able to live and work where they choose, but we should also be able to incentivise some of them to come back so that we can see a return on our public investment, if you like, in their education. We are the only party to have proposed a mechanism, through higher education, to incentivise students to return to work, and you'll be aware that we put forward those proposals ahead of May's election. In that election, you had no policy on this and you claimed that Plaid Cymru would charge students fees. If you implement the Diamond review, fees are likely to be charged by your Government. Will you now accept that we do need to incentivise graduates to return to Wales after study? If you do agree with me, what do you intend to do about it?
Welsh: Diolch i chi am yr ateb, Brif Weinidog. Rwy'n croesawu'n fawr y farn yr ydych chi wedi ei mynegi yn y fan yna. Mae llawer o'n problemau yng Nghymru nad ydynt yn deillio o bobl benodol yn symud i mewn i'r wlad, ond maen nhw'n deillio o'r ffaith bod llawer o'n pobl ifanc yn symud allan a ddim yn dychwelyd, ac mae hyn yn arbennig o wir am raddedigion, lle mae gennym ni gyfradd gadw is nag unrhyw wlad arall yn y DU. Bu llawer o bwyslais ar fewnfudo, yn enwedig o ran y ddadl ar Brexit, ac eto ychydig iawn o sylw a roddwyd i allfudo. Mae Plaid Cymru o'r farn y dylai graddedigion gael byw a gweithio yn lle maen nhw'n dewis, ond dylem ni hefyd allu cymell rhai ohonyn nhw i ddod yn ôl fel y gallwn ni weld adenillion ar ein buddsoddiad cyhoeddus, os mynnwch, yn eu haddysg. Ni yw'r unig blaid sydd wedi cynnig mecanwaith, trwy addysg uwch, i gymell myfyrwyr i ddychwelyd i weithio, a byddwch yn ymwybodol ein bod wedi cyflwyno'r cynigion hyn cyn etholiad mis Mai. Yn yr etholiad hwnnw, nid oedd gennych chi unrhyw bolisi ar hyn a honnwyd gennych y byddai Plaid Cymru yn codi ffioedd ar fyfyrwyr. Os byddwch yn gweithredu adolygiad Diamond, mae ffioedd yn debygol o gael eu codi gan eich Llywodraeth chi. A wnewch chi dderbyn nawr bod angen i ni gymell graddedigion i ddychwelyd i Gymru ar ôl astudio? Os ydych chi'n cytuno â mi, beth ydych chi'n bwriadu ei wneud am y peth?
English: Well - [Interruption.] - the reality of the situation is that, if I recall, the - I think the Minister has intervened there, but I will answer the question. If I remember, the policies that she was pursuing in May would have meant that students would have been incentivised to stay in Wales, in the sense that their fees would have been paid if they'd studied in Wales but not elsewhere. That's not a position that I would share. [Interruption.] From my perspective, what I want to do is to make sure that we attract students into Wales, not just those who are from Wales, but outside Wales as well, and make sure that there are skilled jobs there for them. For me, it's not a question of whether they leave, it's a question of enabling them to return. Because I see no reason why young people wouldn't want to leave, gain experience elsewhere, and come back and bring that experience back with them, in the same way as I know that there are people who will come to Cardiff in their 20s and then go back to rural Wales when they're older. I think they take their experience back with them. For us, it's all about ensuring that the jobs are there. It's why unemployment is at 4.1 per cent - lower than Scotland, lower than England, lower than Northern Ireland - and it's why we are seeing Wales as a good place to invest, to bring skilled jobs, on behalf of so many international companies.
Welsh: Wel - [Torri ar draws.] - realiti'r sefyllfa, os wyf yn cofio - rwy'n credu fod y Gweinidog wedi ymyrryd yn y fan yna, ond rwyf yn mynd i ateb y cwestiwn. Os wyf yn cofio, byddai'r polisïau yr oedd hi'n eu dilyn ym mis Mai yn golygu y byddai myfyrwyr wedi cael eu cymell i aros yng Nghymru, yn yr ystyr y byddai eu ffioedd wedi cael eu talu pe byddent wedi astudio yng Nghymru, ond nid yn rhywle arall. Nid yw hwnnw'n safbwynt y byddwn yn ei rannu. [Torri ar draws.] O'm safbwynt i, yr hyn yr wyf i eisiau ei wneud yw gwneud yn siŵr ein bod ni'n denu myfyrwyr i mewn i Gymru, nid yn unig y rhai sydd o Gymru, ond o'r tu allan i Gymru hefyd, a gwneud yn siŵr bod swyddi medrus yno ar eu cyfer. I mi, nid yw'n gwestiwn o ba un a ydyn nhw'n gadael, mae'n gwestiwn o'u galluogi i ddychwelyd. Oherwydd nid wyf yn gweld unrhyw reswm pam na fyddai pobl ifanc eisiau gadael, ennill profiad yn rhywle arall, a dod yn ôl a dod â'r profiad hwnnw yn ôl gyda nhw, yn yr un modd ag y gwn y bydd pobl a fydd yn dod i Gaerdydd yn eu hugeiniau ac yna'n dychwelyd i gefn gwlad Cymru pan fyddant yn hŷn. Rwy'n credu eu bod yn mynd â'u profiad yn ôl gyda nhw. I ni, mae'r cwbl yn ymwneud â sicrhau bod y swyddi ar gael yno. Dyna pam mae diweithdra yn 4.1 y cant - is na'r Alban, is na Lloegr, is na Gogledd Iwerddon - a dyna pam rydym ni'n gweld Cymru fel lle da i fuddsoddi ynddo, i ddod â swyddi medrus, ar ran cynifer o gwmnïau rhyngwladol.
English: Who can disagree with the powerful testimony that the leader of the opposition has given us? I've no reason to disbelieve what has been said. In an atmosphere of desperation, predators will thrive, and it seems that that is the case in Calais. Last week, I met with the Welsh Local Government Association's responsible elected member for refugees, Dyfed Edwards, the leader of Gwynedd, and we did work through some of these issues, including unaccompanied children. It's true to say that few refugees have come to Wales thus far, but the two of us did talk about how we can help local authorities to resettle adult refugees as well as unaccompanied children. Of course, we agreed to work together as well in order to make sure that, where we feel that funds should come from a non-devolved source, those funds do come from Whitehall. But, certainly, it was a good meeting and it emphasised, once again, that ourselves and the WLGA very much want to ensure that children have a safe haven in Wales and are able to move away permanently from the sort of exploitation that she's relayed to us.
Welsh: Pwy all anghytuno â'r dystiolaeth rymus y mae arweinydd yr wrthblaid wedi ei rhoi i ni? Nid oes gennyf unrhyw reswm i beidio â chredu'r hyn a ddywedwyd. Mewn amgylchedd o anobaith, bydd rheibwyr yn ffynnu, ac mae'n ymddangos bod hynny'n wir yn Calais. Yr wythnos diwethaf, cefais gyfarfod ag aelod etholedig cyfrifol Cymdeithas Llywodraeth Leol Cymru dros ffoaduriaid, Dyfed Edwards, arweinydd Gwynedd, a thrafodwyd rhai o'r materion hyn gennym, gan gynnwys plant heb gwmni. Mae'n wir dweud mai prin yw'r ffoaduriaid sydd wedi dod i Gymru hyd yn hyn, ond siaradodd y ddau ohonom am sut y gallwn helpu awdurdodau lleol i ailsefydlu ffoaduriaid sy'n oedolion yn ogystal â phlant heb gwmni. Wrth gwrs, cytunodd y ddau ohonom i gydweithio hefyd er mwyn gwneud yn siŵr, pan fyddwn yn teimlo y dylai cyllid ddod o ffynhonnell nas datganolwyd, bod y cyllid hwnnw'n dod o Whitehall. Ond, yn sicr, roedd yn gyfarfod da ac yn pwysleisio, unwaith eto, ein bod ni ein hunain a CLlLC yn sicr eisiau sicrhau bod plant yn cael hafan ddiogel yng Nghymru a'u bod yn gallu symud i ffwrdd yn barhaol oddi wrth y math o gamfanteisio y mae hi wedi ei rannu gyda ni.