English: The Member talks about the inconvenient truth. I'm afraid the inconvenient truth is this: that people in Wales were promised there would be no damage to their job prospects as a consequence of leaving the European Union; they were promised there would be not a penny less coming into Wales from European funding sources; they were promised sunny, sunlit uplands by those campaigning to leave the European Union - and the Prime Minister's deal offers none of that. It offers none of it. It offers two years of seeking to stick to red lines, which were never going to be defendable, and spending the time that could have been spent in the kind of cross-party initiatives that the Member has been describing, to reach across to other parts of the House of Commons to seek to build, in admittedly difficult circumstances, a consensus around the kind of Brexit that people in the UK have voted for - that is not what the Prime Minister did. She focused her efforts on managing her own party and managing the tensions in her party, rather than seeking to build that expansive consensus in admittedly difficult times. It's no good, at the eleventh hour, calling up union leaders to give the impression that she is seeking to reach out; it is not credible at this point. The work should have been being done for the last two years. The eleventh hour is not the time at which to be doing that. The Member talks about working together. As a constructive partner, we do work together with the UK Government in terms of preparedness and in terms of many other things. He mentioned the legislative programme; there has been a high degree of co-operation in parts of that. We have had to press for an awful lot of that co-operation, and I have to say, where it has been delivered, it has delivered progress for us. You will know about the inter-governmental agreement, which we worked together on. The point I'm making is this: in putting together the vision - not simply the way it happens, but the vision - for the future of the UK's relationship in the European Union, the Prime Minister had it open to her to reach a broad consensus, and she chose not to follow that path. We have been clear. He asks what we would do if we were in her situation. We have been very clear about this. The time now has come to extend article 50 and create space to enable that kind of discussion to take place, which reflects the principles that this Assembly have supported, to reflect the principles in 'Securing Wales' Future'. Also, we know that senior leaders in the EU will be happy to negotiate on that sort of basis. She has missed that opportunity so far. It is not too late to take that opportunity, and we encourage her to do that.
Welsh: Mae'r Aelod yn sôn am y gwir anghyfleus. Mae arnaf ofn mai'r gwir anghyfleus yw hyn: cafodd pobl yng Nghymru addewid na fyddai unrhyw effaith niweidiol ar eu rhagolygon swyddi o ganlyniad i adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd; cawsant addewid na fyddai ceiniog yn llai yn dod i Gymru o ffynonellau arian Ewropeaidd; cawsant addewid o ucheldiroedd heulog gan y rhai sy'n ymgyrchu i adael yr Undeb Ewropeaidd - ac nid yw cytundeb y Prif Weinidog yn cynnig dim o hynny. Nid yw'n cynnig dim o hynny. Mae'n cynnig dwy flynedd o geisio cadw at safbwyntiau digyfaddawd, na ellid byth mo'u hamddiffyn, a threulio'r amser y gellid ei ddefnyddio yn y math o fentrau trawsbleidiol y mae'r Aelod wedi eu disgrifio, i estyn at rannau eraill o Dŷ'r Cyffredin i geisio meithrin, mewn amgylchiadau anodd mae'n rhaid cyfaddef, consensws ynghylch y math o Brexit y mae pobl yn y DU wedi pleidleisio drosto - nid dyna'r hyn a wnaeth y Prif Weinidog. Canolbwyntiodd ei hymdrechion ar reoli ei phlaid ei hun a rheoli'r tensiynau yn ei phlaid, yn hytrach na cheisio meithrin y consensws eang hwnnw mewn cyfnod anodd rhaid cyfaddef. Nid yw'n dda i ddim, ar yr unfed awr ar ddeg, i alw ar arweinwyr yr undebau i roi'r argraff ei bod yn ceisio estyn allan; nid yw'n gredadwy ar hyn o bryd. Dylai'r gwaith hwn fod wedi cael ei wneud dros y ddwy flynedd diwethaf. Nid yr unfed awr ar ddeg yw'r adeg i wneud hynny. Mae'r Aelod yn sôn am gydweithio. Fel partner adeiladol, rydym ni yn gweithio gyda Llywodraeth y DU o ran y gwaith paratoi ac o ran llawer o bethau eraill. Soniodd am y rhaglen ddeddfwriaethol; bu llawer iawn o gydweithredu ar agweddau o honno. Bu'n rhaid inni bwyso am lawer iawn o'r cydweithredu hwnnw, ac mae'n rhaid imi ddweud, pan wnaed hynny, arweiniodd at gynnydd i ni. Byddwch yn gwybod am y cytundeb rhynglywodraethol, y buom ni'n cydweithio arno. Y pwynt yr wyf yn ei wneud yw hyn: wrth lunio'r weledigaeth - nid dim ond y ffordd y mae'n digwydd, ond y weledigaeth - ar gyfer dyfodol perthynas y DU yn yr Undeb Ewropeaidd, roedd cyfle gan y Prif Weinidog i ffurfio consensws eang, a dewisodd beidio â dilyn y llwybr hwnnw. Rydym ni wedi bod yn glir. Mae'n gofyn beth fyddem ni yn ei wneud pe byddem ni yn ei sefyllfa hi. Rydym ni wedi bod yn glir iawn ynglŷn â hyn. Daeth yn bryd bellach i ymestyn erthygl 50 a chreu'r amgylchiadau i alluogi'r math ar drafodaeth sy'n adlewyrchu'r egwyddorion a gefnogwyd gan y Cynulliad hwn, i adlewyrchu'r egwyddorion yn 'Diogelu Dyfodol Cymru'. Hefyd, rydym ni'n gwybod y bydd uwch arweinwyr yn yr UE yn fodlon negodi ar sail o'r fath. Mae hi wedi colli'r cyfle hwnnw hyd yma. Nid yw hi'n rhy hwyr i achub ar y cyfle hwnnw, ac rydym ni'n ei hannog hi i wneud hynny.