English: I welcome what the First Minister has just said, and I urge him now to carry that message on revocation as a final means of avoiding catastrophe, and also to urge the deputy leader of the party in Wales here to vote for the second referendum, because, as we both accept, the consequences of inaction at this stage of abstention are really too horrendous for us to contemplate. Can I turn to another matter? Last week, the High Court found that the Welsh Government acted unlawfully and breached the promise of independence in relation to the inquiry by Paul Bowen QC, made in a press statement of November 10 last year. Can you confirm that the Government accepts the ruling of the court in full, and whether you have issued an apology to the Sargeant family or plan to do so? Do you intend to waive your right to appeal? Are you able to tell the Senedd how you propose to respond substantively to the judgment in the case in relation to the arrangements governing the inquiry? In particular, do you intend to accept the suggestion made in the judgment that the Presiding Officer nominates a person to make final decisions on the operating protocol of the inquiry, or, as suggested by Mr Bowen, that the inquiry be converted into an inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005? Can you say when you personally first became aware that a prior remit of the operating protocol for the inquiry was given to the Permanent Secretary on 9 November, and that the former First Minister continued to have direct influence over the protocol, breaching the promise of independence? Finally, in view of the damage done to the reputation of the Welsh Government for transparency, openness and honesty, will you now publish a redacted version of the leak inquiry report as previously requested by the Senedd and recently requested by backbench Members of your own party?
Welsh: Rwy'n croesawu'r hyn y mae'r Prif Weinidog newydd ei ddweud, ac rwy'n ei annog nawr i gyfleu'r neges honno ar ddirymu fel modd terfynol o osgoi trychineb, a hefyd i annog dirprwy arweinydd y blaid yng Nghymru yn y fan yma i bleidleisio o blaid yr ail refferendwm, oherwydd, fel y mae'r ddau ohonom ni'n ei dderbyn, mae canlyniadau diffyg gweithredu ar y cyfnod hwn o ymatal yn wirioneddol rhy erchyll i ni eu hystyried. A gaf i droi at fater arall? Yr wythnos diwethaf, canfu'r Uchel Lys bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gweithredu'n anghyfreithlon ac wedi torri'r addewid o annibyniaeth o ran yr ymchwiliad gan Paul Bowen QC, a wnaed mewn datganiad i'r wasg ar 10 Tachwedd y llynedd. A allwch chi gadarnhau bod y Llywodraeth yn derbyn dyfarniad y llys yn llawn, a pha un a ydych chi wedi ymddiheuro i'r teulu Sargeant neu'n bwriadu gwneud hynny? A ydych chi'n bwriadu hepgor eich hawl i apelio? A allwch chi ddweud wrth y Senedd sut yr ydych chi'n bwriadu ymateb yn fanwl i'r dyfarniad yn yr achos o ran y trefniadau a oedd yn llywodraethu'r ymchwiliad? Yn arbennig, a ydych chi'n bwriadu derbyn yr awgrym a wnaed yn y dyfarniad bod y Llywydd yn enwebu unigolyn i wneud penderfyniadau terfynol ar brotocol gweithredu'r ymchwiliad, neu, fel yr awgrymwyd gan Mr Bowen, bod yr ymchwiliad yn cael ei droi'n ymchwiliad o dan Ddeddf Ymchwiliadau 2005? A allwch chi ddweud pryd y daethoch chi yn bersonol yn ymwybodol gyntaf bod cylch gwaith blaenorol y protocol gweithredol ar gyfer yr ymchwiliad wedi ei roi i'r Ysgrifennydd Parhaol ar 9 Tachwedd, a bod y cyn Brif Weinidog wedi parhau i gael dylanwad uniongyrchol dros y protocol, gan dorri'r addewid o annibyniaeth? Yn olaf, o ystyried y niwed a wnaed i enw da Llywodraeth Cymru am dryloywder, bod yn agored a gonestrwydd, a wnewch chi gyhoeddi fersiwn wedi ei golygu o adroddiad yr ymchwiliad datgeliadau nawr, fel y gofynnwyd yn flaenorol gan y Senedd ac fel y gofynnwyd yn ddiweddar gan Aelodau meinciau cefn eich plaid eich hun?