techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: I thank the Member for the question. The service is currently suspended due to the impact of the pandemic, which continues to impact heavily on the global aviation industry. Against this backdrop and at the appropriate time, full and proper consideration will be given to the future of the service. Members will be kept updated by appropriate Ministers.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn. Mae'r gwasanaeth wedi'i atal ar hyn o bryd oherwydd effaith y pandemig, sy'n parhau i effeithio'n fawr ar y diwydiant hedfan byd-eang. Yn erbyn y cefndir hwn ac ar yr adeg briodol, rhoddir ystyriaeth lawn a phriodol i ddyfodol y gwasanaeth. Bydd y Gweinidogion priodol yn rhoi'r wybodaeth ddiweddaraf i'r Aelodau.
English: Thank you. For almost two years, the Anglesey to Cardiff flight, as you have just said, has been grounded. Yet, it was disclosed last month that the Welsh Government has paid out over £750,000 in subsidies - taxpayers' money - in the last financial year. The current contract expires on 17 February 2023 and has a maximum value of £8,529,282. Now, a Welsh Government spokesperson has stated that the tender was based on the provision of 10 flight rotations per week and the final costs are determined by a number of variable factors. So, it seems clear to me, therefore, that those variable factors have allowed Eastern Airways to be paid over £0.75 million of taxpayers' money for zero service in 2021. So, will you clarify whether the Welsh Government has deemed to seek any legal advice in relation to terminating or actually amending this contract?
Welsh: Diolch. Ers bron i ddwy flynedd, mae'r gwasanaeth o Ynys Môn i Gaerdydd, fel rydych newydd ei ddweud, wedi'i atal. Ac eto, fis diwethaf datgelwyd bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi talu dros £750,000 mewn cymorthdaliadau - arian trethdalwyr - yn y flwyddyn ariannol ddiwethaf. Daw'r contract presennol i ben ar 17 Chwefror 2023 ac mae'n werth uchafswm o £8,529,282. Nawr, mae llefarydd ar ran Llywodraeth Cymru wedi dweud bod y tendr yn seiliedig ar ddarparu 10 taith gron yr wythnos a phennir y costau terfynol yn ôl nifer o ffactorau amrywiol. Felly, mae'n ymddangos yn glir i mi fod y ffactorau amrywiol hynny wedi caniatáu i dros £.0.75 miliwn o arian trethdalwyr gael ei dalu i Eastern Airways yn 2021 er na ddarparwyd unrhyw wasanaethau. Felly, a wnewch chi egluro a yw Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ystyried gofyn am unrhyw gyngor cyfreithiol mewn perthynas â therfynu neu ddiwygio'r contract hwn?
English: I thank the Member for that supplementary question. Perhaps I could start by saying that the Cardiff to Anglesey service is a public service obligation. It is fully subsidised by the Welsh Government, which it has been able to do under retained EU law - Regulation (EC) No. 1008/2008 - and any decisions taken in relation to the route will be made in accordance with the requirements of those regulations. In respect of the other points that the Member has made, perhaps I could just remind her that I'm answering questions today in my role as Counsel General and Minister for the Constitution. So, my answers are limited to my specific responsibilities and functions as a law officer and the areas covered by my role as the Minister for the constitution. The question, the supplementary you raise, raises specific policy questions relevant to a particular area, and, as such, should be directed to the relevant portfolio Minister who has responsibility for this area.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am y cwestiwn atodol hwnnw. Efallai y caf ddechrau drwy ddweud bod gwasanaeth Caerdydd i Ynys Môn yn ddyletswydd gwasanaeth cyhoeddus. Mae'n cael cymhorthdal llawn gan Lywodraeth Cymru, a gallodd wneud hynny o dan gyfraith yr UE a ddargedwir - Rheoliad (CE) Rhif 1008/2008 - a bydd unrhyw benderfyniadau a wneir mewn perthynas â'r llwybr yn cael eu gwneud yn unol â gofynion y rheoliadau hynny. Mewn perthynas â'r pwyntiau eraill y mae'r Aelod wedi'u gwneud, efallai y caf ei hatgoffa fy mod yn ateb cwestiynau heddiw yn fy rôl fel y Cwnsler Cyffredinol a Gweinidog y Cyfansoddiad. Felly, mae fy atebion wedi'u cyfyngu i fy nghyfrifoldebau a fy swyddogaethau penodol fel swyddog y gyfraith a'r meysydd sydd wedi'u cynnwys yn fy rôl fel Gweinidog y cyfansoddiad. Mae'r cwestiwn atodol a godwch yn codi cwestiynau polisi penodol sy'n berthnasol i faes penodol, ac fel y cyfryw, dylid ei gyfeirio at y Gweinidog portffolio perthnasol sy'n gyfrifol am y maes hwn.
English: Sorry, I don't agree.
Welsh: Mae'n ddrwg gennyf, nid wyf yn cytuno.
English: Diolch, Llywydd. Minister, can you explain to us why the Independent Commission on the Constitutional Future of Wales has a budget of £3.3 million, please?
Welsh: Diolch, Lywydd. Weinidog, a allwch chi egluro inni pam y mae gan y Comisiwn Annibynnol ar Ddyfodol Cyfansoddiadol Cymru gyllideb o £3.3 miliwn, os gwelwch yn dda?
English: Thank you for the question. The constitution commission has a budget designed to enable it to carry out its important work of engagement with the people of Wales.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiwn. Mae gan gomisiwn y cyfansoddiad gyllideb sydd wedi'i chynllunio i'w alluogi i gyflawni ei waith pwysig yn ymgysylltu â phobl Cymru.
English: Thank you for that answer, Minister, but I'm afraid it still doesn't explain why the commission needs to have such a large budget. When I asked you, on the establishment of this commission, what the budget would be, you said that you would write to me. I'm still waiting for your letter - I haven't received it. But, obviously, I've managed to peek at the Welsh Government's budget, which was debated yesterday, and saw that £3.3 million has been allocated to this particular commission. Previous commissions cost around £1 million to undertake their work - and I'm referring there to the Richard commission and the Silk commission, both of which had a budget that was much less than a third of the budget for this commission. So, can I ask you again: why does the Welsh Government feel that it's necessary to spend £3.3 million on this particular piece of work, and can you provide to the Senedd, and me, in accordance with the promise that you made back in October but are still yet to fulfil, a copy of the detailed budget for this commission's work?
Welsh: Diolch am yr ateb hwnnw, Weinidog, ond mae arnaf ofn nad yw'n egluro pam fod angen i'r comisiwn gael cyllideb mor fawr. Pan sefydlwyd y comisiwn hwn, gofynnais ichi beth fyddai'r gyllideb, ac fe ddywedoch chi y byddech yn ysgrifennu ataf. Rwy'n dal i aros am eich llythyr - nid wyf wedi'i dderbyn. Ond yn amlwg, rwyf wedi llwyddo i gael golwg ar gyllideb Llywodraeth Cymru, a drafodwyd ddoe, a gwelais fod £3.3 miliwn wedi'i ddyrannu i'r comisiwn penodol hwn. Roedd comisiynau blaenorol yn costio tua £1 filiwn i ymgymryd â'u gwaith - ac rwy'n cyfeirio at gomisiwn Richard a chomisiwn Silk, ac roedd gan y ddau ohonynt gyllideb a oedd yn llawer llai na thraean o'r gyllideb ar gyfer y comisiwn hwn. Felly, a gaf fi ofyn ichi eto: pam fod Llywodraeth Cymru yn teimlo bod angen gwario £3.3 miliwn ar y gwaith hwn, ac a allwch chi ddarparu copi o'r gyllideb fanwl ar gyfer gwaith y comisiwn i'r Senedd, ac i mi, yn unol â'r addewid a wnaethoch yn ôl ym mis Hydref ond nad ydych eto wedi'i gyflawni?
English: Well can I say firstly, if you haven't had the letter from me, then apologies for that. Of course, you have the information from the budget, and, of course, I think in previous answers I did refer to the forthcoming budget. In terms of the cost of operating a commission that is going to engage with the people of Wales, over a period of several years, on an issue that is fundamentally important to the future of Wales and the future of the UK, it seems to me absolutely right that there should be sufficient funding to enable it to do that work and to engage with the people of Wales. The engagement part of the commission's work is clearly something that is exceptionally additional to the work of some previous commissions, and is a fundamental part of actually building that consensus that I have described previously. In respect of the actual breakdown, I suspect the problem with the breakdown at the moment is that the commission is, at the moment, in the process of developing its own strategy and its work programme and the costings of that. And I'm sure further information can be made available in due course, when we have further information about those details. But for now, the important part is ensuring that the commission is able and capable of doing work that is so fundamental to the future of Wales and the future of the UK.
Welsh: Wel, a gaf fi ddweud yn gyntaf, os nad ydych wedi cael y llythyr gennyf, rwy'n ymddiheuro am hynny. Wrth gwrs, rydych chi wedi cael y wybodaeth o'r gyllideb, ac wrth gwrs, rwy'n credu fy mod wedi cyfeirio at y gyllideb a oedd i ddod mewn atebion blaenorol. O ran cost gweithredu comisiwn a fydd yn ymgysylltu â phobl Cymru, dros gyfnod o sawl blwyddyn, ar fater sy'n sylfaenol bwysig i ddyfodol Cymru a dyfodol y DU, mae'n ymddangos i mi'n gwbl briodol y dylid cael digon o arian i'w alluogi i wneud y gwaith hwnnw ac i ymgysylltu â phobl Cymru. Mae'n amlwg fod gwaith ymgysylltu'r comisiwn yn rhywbeth cwbl ychwanegol at waith rhai o'r comisiynau blaenorol, ac mae'n rhan sylfaenol o adeiladu'r consensws hwnnw rwyf wedi'i ddisgrifio o'r blaen. O ran y manylion, rwy'n tybio mai'r broblem gyda'r manylion ar hyn o bryd yw bod y comisiwn, ar hyn o bryd, yn y broses o ddatblygu ei strategaeth ei hun a'i rhaglen waith ei hun a chostau hynny. Ac rwy'n siŵr y gellir darparu rhagor o wybodaeth maes o law, pan fydd gennym ragor o wybodaeth am y manylion hynny. Ond am y tro, y peth pwysig yw sicrhau bod y comisiwn yn gallu gwneud gwaith sydd mor hanfodol i ddyfodol Cymru a dyfodol y DU.
English: Well, I'm grateful for your apology, Minister. Of course, there's a single line in the budget to cover this particular issue, and I did ask in previous opportunities in the Senedd for an explanation as to what the remuneration would be for both the chairs and the members of the commission, and I'm still awaiting that information. Of course, it's not contained in the budget that has been published. You talk about engagement; of course, the previous commissions did engage quite extensively as part of their work, and managed it within a financial envelope that is significantly different to the £3.3 million that the Welsh Government has sought to allocate. Now, when you announced the establishment of the commission, you advised Members of the Senedd that you expected it to complete its work by the end of 2023. Can you explain, therefore, why in the budget - the three-year indicative budget that was published - there's still a further £1.1 million allocated for the 2024-25 financial year, which would be after this commission has completed its work? Why is a third of the commission's budget expected to take place after the completion of the commission's work? That seems to me to make no sense at all, or have you revised the timetable?
Welsh: Wel, rwy'n ddiolchgar am eich ymddiheuriad, Weinidog. Wrth gwrs, mae un llinell yn y gyllideb i ymdrin â'r mater penodol hwn, a gofynnais mewn cyfleoedd blaenorol yn y Senedd am esboniad ynglŷn â beth fyddai'r tâl i gadeiryddion ac aelodau'r comisiwn, ac rwy'n dal i aros am y wybodaeth honno. Wrth gwrs, nid yw wedi'i gynnwys yn y gyllideb sydd wedi'i chyhoeddi. Rydych yn sôn am ymgysylltu; wrth gwrs, roedd y comisiynau blaenorol yn ymgysylltu'n eithaf helaeth fel rhan o'u gwaith, ac yn ei reoli o fewn amlen ariannol sy'n wahanol iawn i'r £3.3 miliwn y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi ceisio'i ddyrannu. Nawr, pan gyhoeddoch chi eich bod yn sefydlu'r comisiwn, fe ddywedoch chi wrth Aelodau'r Senedd eich bod yn disgwyl iddo gwblhau ei waith erbyn diwedd 2023. A allwch chi egluro, felly, pam fod £1.1 miliwn arall yn dal i fod wedi'i ddyrannu yn y gyllideb - y gyllideb tair blynedd ddangosol a gyhoeddwyd - ar gyfer blwyddyn ariannol 2024-25, a fyddai ar ôl i'r comisiwn hwn gwblhau ei waith? Pam y disgwylir i draean o gyllideb y comisiwn ddigwydd ar ôl cwblhau gwaith y comisiwn? Mae'n ymddangos i mi nad yw hynny'n gwneud unrhyw synnwyr o gwbl, neu a ydych chi wedi diwygio'r amserlen?
English: Diolch yn fawr, Dirprwy Lywydd. Cwnsler Cyffredinol, the cross-party Legislation, Justice and Constitution Committee's report on the Welsh Government's legislative consent memorandum on the Professional Qualifications Bill pointed out that without the consent of the Senedd or Welsh Ministers, the Secretary of State or Lord Chancellor would be able to exercise regulation-making powers to amend primary legislation, including Senedd Acts. This means that the Secretary of State or the Lord Chancellor could potentially exercise the regulation-making powers to amend Senedd Acts and regulations made by Welsh Ministers. Indeed, Tory Ministers in London could go even further and amend the Government of Wales Act 2006, the basis of our current devolution settlement. I think we can all agree it's a matter of basic constitutional principle that the legislative competence of this Senedd should not be modified by regulations made by any Minister in London, especially this current Conservative Government. What discussion have you had, Counsel General, with Westminster Ministers about the use of secondary legislation in Westminster to potentially undermine the devolution settlement here in Wales?
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Ddirprwy Lywydd. Gwnsler Cyffredinol, nododd adroddiad y Pwyllgor Deddfwriaeth, Cyfiawnder a'r Cyfansoddiad trawsbleidiol ar femorandwm cydsyniad deddfwriaethol Llywodraeth Cymru ar y Bil Cymwysterau Proffesiynol y byddai'r Ysgrifennydd Gwladol neu'r Arglwydd Ganghellor, heb gydsyniad y Senedd neu Weinidogion Cymru, yn gallu arfer pwerau i wneud rheoliadau er mwyn diwygio deddfwriaeth sylfaenol, gan gynnwys Deddfau'r Senedd. Mae hyn yn golygu y gallai'r Ysgrifennydd Gwladol neu'r Arglwydd Ganghellor arfer y pwerau i wneud rheoliadau er mwyn diwygio Deddfau'r Senedd a rheoliadau a wneir gan Weinidogion Cymru. Yn wir, gallai Gweinidogion Torïaidd yn Llundain fynd gam ymhellach a diwygio Deddf Llywodraeth Cymru 2006, sef sail ein setliad datganoli presennol. Credaf y gallwn ni i gyd gytuno ei fod yn fater o egwyddor gyfansoddiadol sylfaenol na ddylai cymhwysedd deddfwriaethol y Senedd hon gael ei addasu drwy reoliadau a wneir gan unrhyw Weinidog yn Llundain, yn enwedig y Llywodraeth Geidwadol bresennol hon. Pa drafodaeth a gawsoch, Gwnsler Cyffredinol, gyda Gweinidogion San Steffan ynghylch y defnydd posibl o is-ddeddfwriaeth yn San Steffan i danseilio'r setliad datganoli yma yng Nghymru?
English: Question 3, Rhys ab Owen.
Welsh: Cwestiwn 3, Rhys ab Owen.
English: Sorry, let me get it. Sorry, I hadn't appreciated I had the third question.
Welsh: Mae'n ddrwg gennyf, gadewch imi ei estyn. Mae'n ddrwg gennyf, nid oeddwn wedi deall mai fy nghwestiwn i oedd y trydydd cwestiwn.
English: You should read the agenda.
Welsh: Dylech ddarllen yr agenda.
English: Thank you very much for that question, Rhys. In my written statement welcoming the publication of the report, I made it clear that the Government strongly endorses the fundamental principle of the recommendations made. We will set out more detail on our plans in the coming months. Members will understand that I cannot give a timetable for the necessary legislation at this stage.
Welsh: Diolch am eich cwestiwn, Rhys. Yn y datganiad ysgrifenedig i groesawu cyhoeddi'r adroddiad, fe wnes i esbonio bod y Llywodraeth yn cefnogi'n gryf yr egwyddor sylfaenol tu ôl i'r argymhellion sydd wedi cael eu gwneud. Byddwn yn nodi mwy o fanylion am ein cynlluniau yn ystod y misoedd nesaf. Bydd yr Aelodau'n deall na allaf roi amserlen ar gyfer y ddeddfwriaeth angenrheidiol ar hyn o bryd.
English: Thank you very much, Counsel General. I see these recommendations, such as establishing an appeals tribunal, as a very important step in developing the justice system here in Wales. Perhaps it's not given much coverage publicly, but I do think there is huge importance to this. In my view, through the Welsh tribunals, we have a foundation to build a fair and just justice system here in Wales. The tribunals are accessible - the issue of accessibility in the current system was raised by Jack Sargeant - and the tribunals are structured in such a way as to encourage discussion rather than conflict. And what's excellent about the Welsh tribunals is that their development isn't subject to the Westminster Government but to the Welsh Government. We cannot blame Westminster this time, Counsel General. Far too often in the past the Welsh tribunals have been forgotten, falling between two stools because of the nature of the devolved settlement, and I very much hope that the Welsh Government will grasp this opportunity. So, in developing them further, does the Counsel General agree with the fundamental principle that all Senedd legislation should from now on use Welsh tribunals to decide on any dispute arising from that legislation, rather than using the county courts of England and Wales? Thank you.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Cwnsler. Rwy'n gweld yr argymhellion yma, fel sefydlu tribiwnlys apêl, fel cam pwysig iawn yn natblygu'r system gyfiawnder yma yng Nghymru. Efallai nad yw e'n cael lot o sylw yn gyhoeddus, ond dwi'n credu ei fod o bwysigrwydd mawr. Yn fy marn i, drwy'r tribiwnlysoedd Cymreig, mae gennym ni sylfaen i adeiladu system cyfiawnder teg a chyfiawn yma yng Nghymru. Mae'r tribiwnlysoedd yn hygyrch - mae hwnna wedi cael ei godi yn barod gan Jack Sargeant, o ran y broblem gyda hygyrchedd yn y system bresennol - ac maen nhw wedi cael eu strwythuro mewn ffordd sy'n annog trafodaeth yn hytrach na gwrthdaro. A beth sy'n wych am y tribiwnlysoedd Cymreig yw dyw eu datblygiad ddim yn amodol ar Lywodraeth San Steffan ond, wrth gwrs, ar Lywodraeth Cymru. Does dim modd beio San Steffan y tro hwn, Cwnsler Cyffredinol. Yn rhy aml o lawer yn y gorffennol, mae'r tribiwnlysoedd Cymreig wedi cael eu hanghofio, yn syrthio rhwng dwy stôl oherwydd natur setliad datganoli, a mawr y gobeithiaf y gwnaiff Llywodraeth Cymru ddal gafael yn y cyfle yma. Felly, wrth eu datblygu ymhellach, a ydy'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol yn cytuno gyda'r egwyddor sylfaenol y dylai holl ddeddfwriaeth Senedd Cymru o nawr ymlaen ddefnyddio Tribiwnlysoedd Cymru i benderfynu ar unrhyw anghydfod sy'n deillio o'r ddeddfwriaeth hynny, yn hytrach na defnyddio llysoedd sirol Cymru a Lloegr? Diolch yn fawr.
English: Thank you for the question. The Welsh Government assesses UK Government initiatives as they arise to ensure that access to justice considerations have been fully considered. Digital technology has the potential to expand access to justice, but the system has to work hard to ensure that no-one is left behind.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiwn. Mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn asesu cynlluniau Llywodraeth y DU wrth iddynt godi i sicrhau bod ystyriaethau mynediad at gyfiawnder wedi cael eu hystyried yn llawn. Mae gan dechnoleg ddigidol botensial i ehangu mynediad at gyfiawnder, ond mae'n rhaid i'r system weithio'n galed i sicrhau nad oes neb yn cael ei adael ar ôl.
English: I thank the Counsel General for that answer, and he'll know that, during the pandemic, we've seen a real shift to using online services to allow people to access justice across Wales. It's out of necessity, and it has provided some opportunities. Without it, many more people would be affected by the delays and backlogs that we do indeed see. But we've got to bear in mind that not everyone has the ability or the means to use these services. In fact, as the Thomas commission said, it can indeed be harder for those who are digitally excluded to access legal rights. So, can I ask what conversations the Counsel General has had with Ministers in the Ministry of Justice to ensure that they are aware of the importance that we in Wales place on ensuring that all court services are accessible by people who lack digital skills, or indeed lack easy access to digital platforms, or indeed to the legal support that needs to go alongside that digital access to justice?
Welsh: Diolch i'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol am yr ateb hwnnw, ac fe fydd yn gwybod ein bod, yn ystod y pandemig, wedi gweld newid go iawn i ddefnyddio gwasanaethau ar-lein i ganiatáu i bobl gael mynediad at gyfiawnder ledled Cymru. Mae'n fater o anghenraid, ac mae wedi darparu rhai cyfleoedd. Hebddo, byddai llawer mwy o bobl yn cael eu heffeithio gan yr oedi a'r ôl-groniadau a welwn. Ond mae'n rhaid inni gofio nad oes gan bawb allu na modd o ddefnyddio'r gwasanaethau hyn. Yn wir, fel y dywedodd comisiwn Thomas, gall yn wir fod yn anos i'r rhai sydd wedi'u hallgáu'n ddigidol gael mynediad at hawliau cyfreithiol. Felly, a gaf fi ofyn pa sgyrsiau y mae'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol wedi'u cael gyda Gweinidogion yn y Weinyddiaeth Gyfiawnder i sicrhau eu bod yn ymwybodol o'r pwyslais rydym ni yng Nghymru yn ei roi ar sicrhau bod pob gwasanaeth llys ar gael i bobl heb sgiliau digidol, neu heb fynediad hawdd at blatfformau digidol, neu'n wir at y cymorth cyfreithiol sydd ei angen ochr yn ochr â mynediad digidol at gyfiawnder?
English: Minister, digital technology has the potential to reshape the way that justice operates and how people access it. The courts and tribunals service is investing roughly about £1 billion to reform its systems with the aim of bringing new technologies and modern ways of working into the courtrooms, and the Ministry of Justice has created a £5 million innovation fund to promote these new ways to deliver legal support and advice through digital means. This will clearly have an impact on Welsh courts. Further to this, has the Minister assessed the range of opportunities for people to use technology to self-diagnose their problem to establish if their problem is a legal one or not?
Welsh: Weinidog, mae gan dechnoleg ddigidol botensial i ail-lunio'r ffordd y mae cyfiawnder yn gweithredu a sut y mae pobl yn cael mynediad ato. Mae'r gwasanaeth llysoedd a thribiwnlysoedd yn buddsoddi tua £1 biliwn i ddiwygio ei systemau gyda'r nod o gyflwyno technolegau newydd a ffyrdd modern o weithio yn y llysoedd, ac mae'r Weinyddiaeth Gyfiawnder wedi creu cronfa arloesi gwerth £5 miliwn i hyrwyddo'r ffyrdd newydd hyn o ddarparu cymorth a chyngor cyfreithiol drwy ddulliau digidol. Mae'n amlwg y bydd hyn yn cael effaith ar lysoedd Cymru. Yn ychwanegol at hyn, a yw'r Gweinidog wedi asesu'r amrywiaeth o gyfleoedd i bobl ddefnyddio technoleg i hunanasesu eu problem i weld a yw'n broblem gyfreithiol ai peidio?
English: I thank the Member for her question. Safeguarding our communities remains the Welsh Government's top priority and we will continue to discharge our devolved responsibilities to do so. We have commissioned the Law Commission to review the legislation, and we will look to bring forward new legislation to allow us to manage disused coal tips in Wales.
Welsh: Diolch i'r Aelod am ei chwestiwn. Mae diogelu ein cymunedau yn parhau i fod yn brif flaenoriaeth i Lywodraeth Cymru, a byddwn yn parhau i gyflawni ein cyfrifoldebau datganoledig i wneud hynny. Rydym wedi comisiynu Comisiwn y Gyfraith i adolygu'r ddeddfwriaeth, a byddwn yn ceisio cyflwyno deddfwriaeth newydd i ganiatáu inni reoli hen domenni glo yng Nghymru.