English: Once again, I agree with Darren; it's groundhog day. We hear again that the first motion by the Brexit Party is to support their belief that leaving the EU without an agreement is a virtuous act and will enhance the lives of the people of Wales. Although this time, they've actually added little bits trying to encourage us by saying that there'll be a reduction on food, clothing and, as pointed out, footwear. I've got my shoes on; I'm okay. But, in that discussion, they say that we won't pay the £39 billion. Well, we had the discussion and the exchange we had earlier, and it has been shown that there's no legal requirement for the whole £39 billion, but I think as Delyth Jewell has pointed out, the failure to meet your moral obligations - and there are moral obligations here - actually could and would probably be seen by the world as a failure to honour treaties that they enter into. And then, you're trying to say, 'Well, we want to trade with you and negotiate a deal with you, but at the same time, we won't give you what we think you should be having'. It's full of fantasies, this motion, and it reflects the total inability of the party opposite to actually put together a cohesive argument for leaving the EU. They want to ignore obligations. And I think that last point, actually, is to blackmail the EU: 'You won't get your money unless you do a deal with us'. That's a form of blackmail. Do you think that other countries are going to meet into that? [ Interruption.] It's not negotiation, and the Member from a sedentary position trying to say it is knows that full well. If he'd ever been in negotiations, he'd know better than that. I have, in a sense, been in negotiations that are slightly different - not with nations, but, more importantly, with my members.
Welsh: Unwaith eto, rwy'n cytuno â Darren; rydym yn ôl gyda'r un peth unwaith eto. Clywn eto mai'r cynnig cyntaf gan Blaid Brexit yw cynnig i gefnogi eu cred fod gadael yr UE heb gytundeb yn weithred rinweddol ac y bydd yn gwella bywydau pobl Cymru. Er hynny, y tro hwn, maent wedi ychwanegu mân bethau er mwyn ceisio ein hannog drwy ddweud y bydd gostyngiadau ar fwyd, dillad ac esgidiau, fel y nodwyd. Mae gennyf fy esgidiau amdanaf; fe fyddaf i'n iawn. Ond yn y drafodaeth honno, maent yn dweud na fyddwn ni'n talu'r £39 biliwn. Wel, cawsom y drafodaeth a'r sgwrs a gawsom yn gynharach, a dangoswyd nad oes gofyniad cyfreithiol am y £39 biliwn cyfan, ond fel y mae Delyth Jewell wedi nodi rwy'n credu, fe allai ac fe fydd y methiant i gyflawni eich rhwymedigaethau moesegol - a cheir rhwymedigaethau moesegol yma - yn debygol o gael ei weld gan y byd fel methiant i anrhydeddu cytuniadau y maent yn ymrwymo iddynt. Ac yna, rydych chi'n ceisio dweud, 'Wel, rydym eisiau masnachu gyda chi a negodi cytundeb gyda chi, ond ar yr un pryd, ni fyddwn yn rhoi'r hyn y credwn y dylech fod yn ei gael'. Mae'r cynnig hwn yn llawn o ffantasïau, ac mae'n adlewyrchu anallu llwyr y blaid gyferbyn i lunio dadl gydlynol dros adael yr UE. Maent am anwybyddu rhwymedigaethau. A chredaf fod y pwynt olaf, mewn gwirionedd, yn sôn am flacmelio'r UE: 'Ni chewch eich arian oni bai eich bod yn ymrwymo i gytundeb â ni'. Mae hynny'n ffurf ar flacmel. A ydych yn credu bod gwledydd eraill yn mynd i fodloni ar hynny? [ Torri ar draws.] Nid negodi ydyw, ac mae'r Aelod sy'n ceisio dweud o'i sedd mai dyna ydyw yn gwybod hynny'n iawn. Pe bai erioed wedi bod mewn negodiadau, byddai'n gwybod yn well na hynny. Mewn ffordd, rwyf wedi bod mewn negodiadau ychydig yn wahanol - nid gyda gwledydd, ond yn bwysicach, gyda fy aelodau.