English: Thank you, Presiding Officer. It's my pleasure to move the amendments in group 2 standing in my name, and I hope they'll find support in the Assembly, but, again, I don't think I'll have much luck there, to be honest, but there you go, it's worth a try, because it is an important area. It is about powers of inspection and the person who will be delegated to undertake that inspection. At the moment, the Bill is not clear exactly who would do that, and these amendments merely seek to tidy that piece of legislation up so that it would either have to be a veterinary surgeon or a suitably qualified individual. It was a fair criticism in the evidence session and also the Stage 2 proceedings of the committee that the Minister did point out that, actually, in that amendment at that time, we were very prescriptive in saying it should be specifically just a veterinary surgeon. This time, we've broadened the amendment to say a suitably qualified person. I think many of us, in our roles as politicians, have always sat in the middle of disputes and looked for expert opinions and expert advice. Well, in fairness, you cannot get a more expert opinion in this particular field of inspection than a veterinary surgeon or a suitably qualified person with a similar qualification to a veterinary surgeon. Surely, as politicians, we should be trying to take out the conflict in any piece of legislation, and, hopefully, have a successful resolution where that area might be in dispute. So, this series of amendments seeks to do that, and I hope very much that the Welsh Parliament will endorse the amendments that are standing in my name, and, hopefully, have a far stronger piece of legislation that actually can get the dispute process in better order, should these powers be required - powers of entry and powers of inspection. So I hope that the Parliament will support the amendments standing in my name this afternoon.
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Lywydd. Mae'n bleser gennyf gynnig y gwelliannau yng ngrŵp 2 sy'n sefyll yn fy enw i, a gobeithio y cânt gefnogaeth yn y Cynulliad, ond unwaith eto, nid wyf yn credu y caf lawer o lwc, a dweud y gwir, ond dyna chi, mae'n werth rhoi cynnig arni, oherwydd mae'n faes pwysig. Mae'n ymwneud â phwerau arolygu a'r person a gaiff ei ddirprwyo i gynnal yr arolygiad hwnnw. Ar hyn o bryd, nid yw'r Bil yn glir ynglŷn â phwy'n union a fyddai'n gwneud hynny, ac mae'r gwelliannau hyn yn ceisio tacluso'r ddeddfwriaeth honno fel y byddai'n rhaid i'r person naill ai fod yn filfeddyg neu'n unigolyn â'r cymwysterau addas. Roedd yn feirniadaeth deg yn y sesiwn dystiolaeth a hefyd yng nghyfarfodydd Cyfnod 2 y pwyllgor fod y Gweinidog wedi nodi, mewn gwirionedd, yn y gwelliant ar y pryd, ein bod yn rhagnodol iawn wrth ddweud mai milfeddyg yn benodol a ddylai wneud hynny. Y tro hwn, rydym wedi ehangu'r gwelliant i ddweud person â chymwysterau addas. Rwy'n credu bod llawer ohonom, yn ein rolau fel gwleidyddion, wedi eistedd ynghanol anghydfod ac wedi edrych am farn arbenigol a chyngor arbenigol. Wel, a bod yn deg, ni allwch gael barn fwy arbenigol yn y maes arolygu penodol hwn na milfeddyg neu berson â chymwysterau addas sydd â chymhwyster tebyg i filfeddyg. Yn sicr, fel gwleidyddion, dylem geisio cael gwared ar y gwrthdaro mewn unrhyw ddeddfwriaeth, a chael datrysiad llwyddiannus, gobeithio, lle gallai fod anghydfod. Felly, mae'r gyfres hon o welliannau'n ceisio gwneud hynny, a mawr obeithiaf y bydd Senedd Cymru'n cymeradwyo'r gwelliannau sy'n sefyll yn fy enw i, ac yn cael deddfwriaeth lawer cryfach a all roi gwell trefn ar y broses anghydfod pe bai angen y pwerau hyn - pwerau mynediad a phwerau archwilio. Felly rwy'n gobeithio y bydd y Senedd yn cefnogi'r gwelliannau yn fy enw i y prynhawn yma.