English: Thank you for those questions, and perhaps just one statistic to put in to add to those: of course, within Wales alone, in one year - or, I think, in the last two years - there have been produced an estimated 100 million plastic cup lids. So, that's an indication, I think, of the scale. And of course you referred to the pollution of the seas, and of course that's why our concern about the banning of oxo-degradables as well, because all they do is actually break down the plastic, but they don't eliminate the plastic - the plastic just gets into even smaller items, miniscule items, to contaminate our seas, our waterways and our land. You raised some very important issues with regard to the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020, and of course this is a matter I've spoken on on many occasions. In fact, I made a statement on 18 August with regard to the Supreme Court rejecting our application for permission to appeal the order of the Court of Appeal that our claim for judicial review of the Act was premature. So, we were disappointed with that, but that was a judgment very much to do with process. But in terms of this legislation, and I suppose in accordance with the points that the Member has raised, our position - and this is why we sought the judicial review through the Supreme Court - is that UKIMA does not have the capacity to take away our devolved competence, and I am confident that this legislation is within our competence. If a different view is taken, then there are options that are open. There are options for me, if I thought it appropriate, to refer the matter under section 112 of the Government of Wales Act 2006, to refer a Bill to the Supreme Court. I see no reason why that would arise on this occasion. It was also open, of course, to the UK Government to take similar measures. But our view is that the Bill is within competence. We do not expect the UK Government to refer the Bill to the Supreme Court, and if actions are taken, then obviously we will consider our position at that stage, and in particular with all the issues and arguments that we wanted to raise in the Supreme Court, where the Supreme Court said they would rather have an example of legislation that they could test it against. It seems to me that the appropriate course of action at this moment in time is to base the assessed competence on our analysis of what the competence is, and that is UKIMA does not have the competence to overturn our statutory devolution powers, and therefore it is within competence. You correctly raise issues of scrutiny. We do want the Bill to move forward quickly. This is one of the reasons why the draft Bill was tabled as early as possible, to enable yet further consultation by the committee. But it is a relatively simple Bill. There are technical complexities - those, as I mentioned earlier, in terms of how you actually define something, and of course in legislation, as the Member will know, you have to be very clear about what you're defining, what it is you are talking about and what action can actually be taken. But of course I will do everything I can, and I know the Minister will, in respect of supporting the scrutiny. In terms of the longer term issues, of course there's ongoing work that perhaps it's fair for me to mention now - not within my portfolio, but certainly within the portfolio of the Minister - looking at the issues of reusable bottles and bottle banks and so on; deposit schemes, packaging and so on. Those are discussions that are under way. Policy is being developed and, in actual fact, this legislation also enables us not only to add to the list, but also to support adding to that list by looking at alternative schemes and encouraging those schemes, and also through educational processes and the work that governments naturally do to shift culture, to change culture in terms of our orientation, our reliance on and our addiction to the use of single-use plastics. But I think this particular Bill is a very significant step forward and is the most comprehensive piece of legislation in this area in the UK.
Welsh: Diolch am y cwestiynau hynny, ac efallai dim ond un ystadegyn i'w ychwanegu at y rhai hynny: wrth gwrs, o fewn Cymru yn unig, mewn un flwyddyn - neu, rwy'n credu, yn y ddwy flynedd ddiwethaf - mae amcangyfrif o 100 miliwn o gaeadau cwpanau plastig wedi'u cynhyrchu. Felly, mae hynny'n arwydd, rwy'n credu, o'r raddfa. Ac wrth gwrs fe gyfeirioch chi at lygru'r moroedd, ac wrth gwrs dyna pam mae ein pryder am wahardd eitemau ocso-ddiraddadwy hefyd, oherwydd y cyfan maen nhw'n ei wneud yw torri lawr y plastig mewn gwirionedd, ond dydyn nhw ddim yn cael gwared ar y plastig - mae'r plastig yn mynd yn ddarnau llai byth, darnau bach bach, i halogi ein moroedd, ein dyfrffyrdd a'n tir. Gwnaethoch chi godi rhai materion pwysig iawn o ran Deddf Marchnad Fewnol y Deyrnas Unedig 2020, ac wrth gwrs mae hwn yn fater yr wyf wedi sôn amdano droeon. Mewn gwirionedd, fe wnes i ddatganiad ar 18 Awst am y Goruchaf Lys yn gwrthod ein cais am ganiatâd i apelio yn erbyn gorchymyn y Llys Apêl bod ein cais am adolygiad barnwrol o'r Ddeddf yn gynamserol. Felly, cawsom ein siomi gyda hynny, ond roedd hynny'n ddyfarniad a oedd yn bennaf yn ymwneud â phroses. Ond o ran y ddeddfwriaeth hon, ac mae'n debyg fy mod yn cytuno â'r pwyntiau y mae'r Aelod wedi'u codi, ein safbwynt ni - a dyma pam y gwnaethom ofyn am yr adolygiad barnwrol drwy'r Goruchaf Lys - yw nad oes gan y ddeddf hon y gallu i ddileu ein cymhwysedd datganoledig, ac rwy'n hyderus bod y ddeddfwriaeth hon o fewn ein cymhwysedd. Os cymerir golwg wahanol, yna mae yna opsiynau sydd ar agor. Mae yna opsiynau i mi, pe bawn i'n credu ei bod yn briodol, i gyfeirio'r mater o dan adran 112 o Ddeddf Llywodraeth Cymru 2006, i gyfeirio Bil at y Goruchaf Lys. Ni welaf unrhyw reswm pam y byddai hynny'n codi y tro hwn. Roedd hefyd yn agored, wrth gwrs, i Lywodraeth y DU gymryd camau tebyg. Ond ein barn ni yw bod y Bil o fewn cymhwysedd. Nid ydym yn disgwyl i Lywodraeth y DU gyfeirio'r Bil at y Goruchaf Lys, ac os bydd camau'n cael eu cymryd, yna yn amlwg byddwn yn ystyried ein safbwynt ar y cam hwnnw, ac yn benodol gyda'r holl faterion a dadleuon yr oeddem ni eisiau eu codi yn y Goruchaf Lys, lle dywedodd y Goruchaf Lys y byddai'n well ganddynt gael enghraifft o ddeddfwriaeth y gallent ei phrofi yn ei herbyn. Mae'n ymddangos i mi mai'r cwrs gweithredu priodol ar hyn o bryd yw seilio'r cymhwysedd a aseswyd ar ein dadansoddiad ni o'r hyn yw'r cymhwysedd, sef nad oes gan y ddeddf y cymhwysedd i wrthdroi ein pwerau datganoli statudol, ac felly mae o fewn cymhwysedd. Rydych yn gywir wrth godi materion craffu. Rydym yn dymuno i'r Bil symud ymlaen yn gyflym. Dyma un o'r rhesymau pam y cafodd y Bil drafft ei gyflwyno mor gynnar â phosib, er mwyn galluogi ymgynghoriad pellach eto gan y pwyllgor. Ond mae'n Fil cymharol syml. Mae cymhlethdodau technegol - y rhai hynny, fel y soniais yn gynharach, o ran sut rydych chi'n diffinio rhywbeth mewn gwirionedd, ac wrth gwrs mewn deddfwriaeth, fel y bydd yr Aelod yn gwybod, mae'n rhaid i chi fod yn glir iawn am yr hyn yr ydych chi'n ei ddiffinio, yr hyn yr ydych yn sôn amdano a pha gamau y gellir eu cymryd mewn gwirionedd. Ond wrth gwrs mi wnaf bopeth y gallaf, ac rwy'n gwybod y gwnaiff y Gweinidog hynny, o ran cefnogi'r craffu. O ran y materion tymor hirach, wrth gwrs mae yna waith parhaus y mae'n deg i mi sôn amdano, efallai, yn awr - nid o fewn fy mhortffolio, ond yn sicr o fewn portffolio'r Gweinidog - gan edrych ar faterion poteli y gellir eu hailddefnyddio a banciau poteli ac ati; cynlluniau dychwelyd ernes, pecynnu ac ati. Mae'r rheiny'n drafodaethau sydd ar y gweill. Mae polisi yn cael ei ddatblygu ac, mewn gwirionedd, mae'r ddeddfwriaeth hon hefyd yn ein galluogi nid yn unig i ychwanegu at y rhestr, ond hefyd i gefnogi ychwanegu at y rhestr honno drwy edrych ar gynlluniau amgen ac annog y cynlluniau hynny, a hefyd drwy brosesau addysgol a'r gwaith y mae llywodraethau'n naturiol yn ei wneud i symud diwylliant ymlaen, i newid diwylliant o ran ein cyfeiriadaeth, ein dibyniaeth ar a'n caethiwed i'r defnydd o blastig untro. Ond rwy'n credu bod y Bil penodol hwn yn gam sylweddol iawn ymlaen a dyma'r darn mwyaf cynhwysfawr o ddeddfwriaeth yn y maes hwn yn y DU.