techiaith/cofnodycynulliad_en-cy huggingface dataset:
English: Well, you're right, First Minister, to question leadership on this matter, and people are questioning the leadership of your Government under these circumstances. And let me remind you, First Minister, this isn't the first time we've raised this terrible situation in this Chamber. And the last time I questioned you in March, you told me that mothers and babies are no longer at risk under Cwm Taf. If that was the case, I for one have been left wondering why the health Minister today has actually ordered maternity services at the Royal Glamorgan and Prince Charles hospitals to be put into special measures. It's quite clear that you as a Government didn't have a grip on our health service, because your Minister has admitted today in his statement that he was unaware of an internal investigation from September last year. Surely your Government should have known what state of crisis these services were in, and why has it taken you so long to publish today's report, given that the first formal concerns at Cwm Taf were reported nearly seven years ago? And now, a review of 43 pregnancies will have to be carried out. Isn't it true that the health Minister and your Government have failed for far too long? You must be more transparent, First Minister, with the people of Wales. Instead of rearranging the seating plan around the board table, who will now actually take responsibility for this?
Welsh: Wel, rydych chi'n iawn, Prif Weinidog, i gwestiynu arweinyddiaeth ar y mater hwn, ac mae pobl yn cwestiynu arweinyddiaeth eich Llywodraeth chi o dan yr amgylchiadau hyn. A gadewch i mi eich atgoffa, Prif Weinidog, nid dyma'r tro cyntaf i ni godi'r sefyllfa ofnadwy hon yn y Siambr hon. A'r tro diwethaf i mi eich holi ym mis Mawrth, dywedasoch wrthyf nad yw mamau a babanod mewn perygl o dan Gwm Taf mwyach. Pe byddai hynny'n wir, rwyf i'n un o lawer sydd wedi cael fy ngadael yn pendroni pam mae'r Gweinidog iechyd heddiw wedi gorchymyn bod gwasanaethau mamolaeth yn ysbytai Brenhinol Morgannwg a'r Tywysog Siarl yn cael eu gwneud yn destun mesurau arbennig. Mae'n gwbl amlwg nad oedd gennych chi fel Llywodraeth afael ar ein gwasanaeth iechyd, oherwydd mae eich Gweinidog wedi cyfaddef heddiw yn ei ddatganiad nad oedd yn ymwybodol o ymchwiliad mewnol o fis Medi y llynedd. Oni ddylai eich Llywodraeth fod wedi gwybod faint o argyfwng yr oedd y gwasanaethau hyn ynddo, a pham mae wedi cymryd cyhyd i gyhoeddi'r adroddiad heddiw, o gofio i'r pryderon ffurfiol cyntaf yng Nghwm Taf gael eu hadrodd bron i saith mlynedd yn ôl? A nawr, bydd yn rhaid cynnal adolygiad o 43 o achosion o feichiogrwydd. Onid yw'n wir bod y Gweinidog iechyd a'ch Llywodraeth chi wedi methu am lawer gormod o amser? Mae'n rhaid i chi fod yn fwy tryloyw, Prif Weinidog, gyda phobl Cymru. Yn hytrach nag aildrefnu'r cynllun seddau o amgylch bwrdd y Bwrdd, pwy wnaiff gymryd cyfrifoldeb am hyn nawr mewn gwirionedd?
English: But, First Minister, this latest development does call into question your leadership and the leadership of this Government to run our NHS. It's a sad fact, isn't it, that with five out of seven health boards across the country under special measures or targeted interventions, there is barely anything special or unusual about it anymore? This seems the new norm and the sad reality for the people of Wales under your Government. It takes an enormous amount of resources to heavily monitor so many services. Most notably, we are now approaching the four-year mark of Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board being placed into special measures, making it the longest running special measurers health board in Britain. So, how is your Government keeping up with these extra demands? With such a dangerous record of established and proven healthcare failings under successive Labour and Labour-led Governments, can you today reassure the people of Wales how you intend to turn around the fortunes of our Welsh health service?
Welsh: Ond, Prif Weinidog, mae'r datblygiad diweddaraf hwn yn codi amheuon ynghylch eich arweinyddiaeth chi ac arweinyddiaeth y Llywodraeth hon i redeg ein GIG. Mae'n ffaith drist, onid yw, gyda phump o'r saith bwrdd iechyd ar draws y wlad yn destun mesurau arbennig neu ymyraethau wedi eu targedu, nad oes prin unrhyw beth arbennig neu anarferol yn ei gylch erbyn hyn? Mae'n ymddangos mai dyma'r norm newydd a'r gwirionedd trist i bobl Cymru o dan eich Llywodraeth chi. Mae angen cryn dipyn o adnoddau i fonitro cymaint o wasanaethau yn ddwys. Yn fwyaf nodedig, rydym ni'n nesáu at bedair blynedd erbyn hyn ers i Fwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Betsi Cadwaladr gael ei wneud yn destun mesurau arbennig, sy'n golygu mai dyma'r bwrdd iechyd sydd wedi bod yn destun mesurau arbennig ers y cyfnod hwyaf ym Mhrydain. Felly, sut mae eich Llywodraeth chi yn ymdopi â'r gofynion ychwanegol hyn? Gyda hanes mor beryglus o fethiannau gofal iechyd sefydledig a phrofedig o dan Lywodraethau Llafur a Llywodraethau olynol dan arweiniad Llafur, a allwch chi roi sicrwydd heddiw i bobl Cymru sut yr ydych chi'n bwriadu gweddnewid tynged ein gwasanaeth iechyd yng Nghymru?
English: Llywydd, I don't believe that what we have read in this report is emblematic of maternity services across Wales. I have met midwives in every single part of Wales. They are amongst some of the most impressive health professionals I have ever met and they provide and absolutely dedicated and determined service for people. I was asked by the leader of the opposition whether this was emblematic of the service that is provided by staff of the NHS across Wales and I'm simply saying to him that, in my view, it is not and it does not reflect my experience of meeting front-line staff in every part of Wales. Nevertheless, we recognise that people across Wales need an assurance that what has been discovered at Cwm Taf is not characteristic of the service that they provide. That is why, in addition to the independent maternity oversight panel that the Minister has established, and in addition to the actions that are being taken to improve the effectiveness of board leadership and governance in that local health board, the Minister has also announced today in his statement that across the NHS in Wales, we will carry out an assurance exercise, led by the chief nursing officer and the chief medical officer, and there will be a review later this year by Healthcare Inspectorate Wales of maternity services across Wales. Because while I don't think that this is emblematic of maternity services across Wales, patients across Wales deserve to have that independent assurance that the service they are providing is one that we in this Chamber would be proud to receive ourselves.
Welsh: Llywydd, nid wyf i'n credu bod yr hyn yr ydym ni wedi ei ddarllen yn yr adroddiad hwn yn nodweddiadol o wasanaethau mamolaeth ledled Cymru. Rwyf i wedi cyfarfod â bydwragedd ym mhob rhan o Gymru. Maen nhw ymhlith rhai o'r gweithwyr iechyd proffesiynol gorau i mi eu cyfarfod erioed ac maen nhw'n darparu gwasanaeth cwbl ymroddedig a phenderfynol i bobl. Gofynnwyd i mi gan arweinydd yr wrthblaid a oedd hyn yn nodweddiadol o'r gwasanaeth a ddarperir gan staff y GIG ledled Cymru ac rwy'n dweud wrtho'n syml nad ydyw, yn fy marn i, ac nid yw'n adlewyrchu fy mhrofiad i o gyfarfod staff rheng flaen ym mhob rhan o Gymru. Serch hynny, rydym ni'n cydnabod bod pobl ledled Cymru angen sicrwydd nad yw'r hyn a ddarganfuwyd yng Nghwm Taf yn nodweddiadol o'r gwasanaeth y maen nhw'n ei ddarparu. Dyna pam, yn ogystal â'r panel goruchwylio mamolaeth annibynnol y mae'r Gweinidog wedi ei sefydlu, ac yn ychwanegol at y camau sy'n cael eu cymryd i wella effeithiolrwydd arweinyddiaeth a llywodraethiant byrddau yn y bwrdd iechyd lleol hwnnw, y mae'r Gweinidog hefyd wedi cyhoeddi heddiw yn ei ddatganiad y byddwn yn cynnal, ar draws y GIG yng Nghymru, ymarfer sicrwydd, dan arweiniad y prif swyddog nyrsio a'r prif swyddog meddygol, a bydd adolygiad yn ddiweddarach eleni gan Arolygiaeth Gofal Iechyd Cymru o wasanaethau mamolaeth ledled Cymru. Oherwydd, er nad wyf i'n credu bod hyn yn nodweddiadol o wasanaethau mamolaeth ledled Cymru, mae cleifion ledled Cymru yn haeddu cael y sicrwydd annibynnol hwnnw bod y gwasanaeth y maen nhw'n ei ddarparu yn un y byddem ni yn y Siambr hon yn falch o'i gael ein hunain.
English: In going through the various levels of responsibility in this case a moment ago, there was one level that you failed to mention, namely the ministerial level, the governmental level - the level that you're responsible for. Nobody has resigned as a result of these damning failings in maternity services in Cwm Taf, and yet, surely somebody has to take responsibility, and it's Ministers who do have to carry the can, ultimately. And that includes you, First Minister, because one of the reports highlights concerns dating back to 2015, and your tenure as health Minister. An internal report from a senior midwife has raised the curtain on further cases of stillbirth going back eight years that the health board didn't report on, and the authors of the report, it's important to note, have recommended that those cases should be subject to inquiry too. Now, this morning, in an interview on the BBC, a mother who gave birth to her daughter at the Royal Glamorgan Hospital last year, who subsequently passed away, said that the resignation of the health Minister would give her and those in the same position as her some assurance that others in future wouldn't face the same suffering, although it wouldn't, of course, bring her daughter back. Given the responsibility that you and your health Minister share for the systemic failures in Cwm Taf, wouldn't it be the right thing for you as First Minister to not only ask your health Minister to apologise to these families, but also to ask him to do the honourable thing and resign?
Welsh: Wrth fynd trwy'r lefelau gwahanol o gyfrifoldeb yn yr achos yma jest nawr, roedd un lefel wnaethoch chi ddim enwi, sef y lefel weinidogol, y lefel lywodraethol - y lefel rŷch chi'n gyfrifol amdani. Does neb wedi ymddiswyddo o ganlyniad i'r methiannau damniol yn y gwasanaeth mamolaeth yng Nghwm Taf, ac eto, does bosib, mae'n rhaid i rywun gymryd cyfrifoldeb, a Gweinidogion sy'n gorfod dal y cyfrifoldeb yn y pen draw. Ac mae hynny'n eich cynnwys chi, Brif Weinidog, achos mae un o'r adroddiadau'n tynnu sylw at bryderon yn dyddio nôl i 2015, a'ch cyfnod chi fel Gweinidog iechyd. Mae adroddiad mewnol gan fydwraig uwch wedi codi'r llen ar achosion pellach o farw-enedigaethau yn mynd nôl wyth mlynedd na wnaeth y bwrdd iechyd roi gwybod amdanyn nhw, ac mae awduron yr adroddiad, mae'n bwysig i nodi, wedi argymell bod yr achosion hynny yn cael eu gwneud yn destun ymchwiliad hefyd. Nawr, y bore yma mewn cyfweliad â'r BBC, dywedodd mam a wnaeth roi genedigaeth i'w merch yn Ysbyty Brenhinol Morgannwg y llynedd, ac a fu farw wedyn, y byddai ymddiswyddiad y Gweinidog iechyd yn rhoi peth sicrwydd iddi hi a rhai tebyg iddi hi na fyddai pobl eraill yn y dyfodol yn wynebu'r un dioddefaint, er na fyddai'n dod â'i merch yn ôl. O ystyried y cyfrifoldeb rŷch chi a'ch Gweinidog iechyd yn ei rannu dros y methiannau systemig yng Nghwm Taf, onid y peth cywir i chi fel Prif Weinidog ei wneud yw nid yn unig gofyn i'ch Gweinidog iechyd ymddiheuro wrth y teuluoedd yma ond gofyn iddo hefyd wneud y peth anrhydeddus ac ymddiswyddo?
English: Well, I do not agree with what the Member has said. As I explained in my reply to Paul Davies, we're in the situation that we are in today, where we're able to discuss what's happened in Cwm Taf, because the Minister took the action that he did.
Welsh: Wel, dwi ddim yn cytuno â beth mae'r Aelod wedi dweud. Fel esboniais i yn yr ateb i Paul Davies, rŷn ni yn y sefyllfa rŷn ni ynddi heddiw, yn gallu trafod beth sydd wedi digwydd yng Nghwm Taf, achos bod y Gweinidog wedi gwneud yr hyn y mae e wedi ei wneud.
English: And I don't believe, myself, Llywydd, that the terribly difficult days that those families have gone through and the very difficult day that they will go through today - that they look to a single individual as the way of resolving those difficulties. It is because of the actions that the Minister has taken that these matters have come to light. It is because of the actions that the Minister has taken that we have an independent report, and it is because of the actions that the Minister has taken that we now have a set of measures in place to give those families assurance about what has happened in the past and, to those families who still need to use that service, an assurance of the standard of care that they will receive. I commend the Minister for the fact that he is meeting those families directly, that he will speak to them, that he will hear from them of their experiences, and that he will be responsible for the actions that this Government has taken. I think that is a far better way to respond seriously, as we ought to, to the history of what has happened and to the individual experiences that lie behind the report we are discussing this afternoon.
Welsh: Ac nid wyf i'n credu, yn bersonol, Llywydd, bod y dyddiau ofnadwy o anodd y mae'r teuluoedd hynny wedi eu dioddef a'r diwrnod anodd iawn y byddan nhw'n ei ddioddef heddiw - eu bod nhw'n troi at un unigolyn fel y ffordd o ddatrys yr anawsterau hynny. Oherwydd y camau y mae'r Gweinidog wedi eu cymryd y mae'r materion hyn wedi dod i'r amlwg. Oherwydd y camau y mae'r Gweinidog wedi eu cymryd y mae gennym ni adroddiad annibynnol, ac oherwydd y camau y mae'r Gweinidog wedi eu cymryd y mae gennym ni gyfres o fesurau ar waith erbyn hyn i roi sicrwydd i'r teuluoedd hynny am yr hyn sydd wedi digwydd yn y gorffennol ac, i'r teuluoedd hynny sy'n dal i fod angen defnyddio'r gwasanaeth hwnnw, sicrwydd ynghylch safon y gofal y byddan nhw yn ei dderbyn. Rwy'n canmol y Gweinidog am y ffaith ei fod yn cyfarfod â'r teuluoedd hynny yn uniongyrchol, y bydd yn siarad â nhw, y bydd yn clywed ganddyn nhw am eu profiadau, ac y bydd yn gyfrifol am y camau y mae'r Llywodraeth hon wedi eu cymryd. Credaf fod honno'n ffordd well o lawer o ymateb o ddifrif, fel y dylem ni ei wneud, i hanes yr hyn sydd wedi digwydd ac i'r profiadau unigol sy'n sail i'r adroddiad yr ydym ni'n ei drafod y prynhawn yma.
English: First Minister, yesterday, your Government declared a climate emergency, which we on this side obviously welcome and which we hope the Senedd will endorse through our motion tomorrow. Most people will be reasonably of the view that yesterday's announcement will be incompatible with any subsequent decision to plough ahead with the environmentally destructive M4 black route. Can you confirm that the declaration of a climate emergency, presuming it has substance and isn't merely declaratory, is a change in policy that will be a new and materially relevant factor in your decision making on the M4, and have you asked officials for additional advice on that basis? You have today also confirmed that you will not be making an announcement on the M4 until the first week of June. Given your party is deeply divided on this issue, isn't it just a little bit convenient, First Minister, to kick this down the road, all £2 billion-worth of it, until after the European elections? You said on Sunday you were seeking advice on whether this decision would be caught by the rules on pre-election announcements. Have you received that advice? Is that the justification for this further delay? And did the advice from officials remind you of the general principles set out in guidance that, although in some cases it may be better to defer an announcement, that needs to be balanced carefully against any implication that deferral could itself influence the political outcome?
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, ddoe, fe wnaeth eich Llywodraeth ddatgan argyfwng hinsawdd, yr ydym ni ar yr ochr hon yn amlwg yn ei groesawu ac yr ydym ni'n gobeithio y bydd y Senedd yn ei gymeradwyo drwy ein cynnig yfory. Bydd y rhan fwyaf o bobl o'r farn resymol y bydd cyhoeddiad ddoe yn anghydnaws ag unrhyw benderfyniad dilynol i fwrw ymlaen â llwybr y DU yr M4 a fydd mor ddinistriol i'r amgylchedd. A allwch chi gadarnhau bod y datganiad o argyfwng hinsawdd, gan dybio bod sylwedd iddo ac nad yw'n ddatganol yn unig, yn newid polisi a fydd yn ffactor newydd a pherthnasol yn eich penderfyniad ar yr M4, ac a ydych chi wedi gofyn i swyddogion am gyngor ychwanegol ar y sail honno? Rydych chi wedi cadarnhau heddiw hefyd na fyddwch chi'n gwneud cyhoeddiad ar y M4 tan yr wythnos gyntaf ym mis Mehefin. O gofio bod eich plaid yn rhanedig iawn ar y mater hwn, onid yw ddim ond ychydig bach yn gyfleus, Prif Weinidog, gohirio'r penderfyniad hwn, y penderfyniad gwerth £2 biliwn cyfan, tan ar ôl yr etholiadau Ewropeaidd? Dywedasoch ddydd Sul eich bod yn ceisio cyngor ynghylch pa un a fyddai'r penderfyniad hwn yn cael ei ddal gan y rheolau ar gyhoeddiadau cyn etholiad. A ydych chi wedi cael y cyngor hwnnw? Ai dyna'r cyfiawnhad dros yr oedi pellach hwn? Ac a wnaeth y cyngor gan swyddogion eich atgoffa chi o'r egwyddorion cyffredinol a nodwyd mewn canllawiau, er y gallai fod yn well gohirio cyhoeddiad mewn rhai achosion, bod angen cydbwyso hynny'n ofalus yn erbyn unrhyw awgrym y gallai'r gohirio ei hun ddylanwadu ar y canlyniad gwleidyddol?
English: Now, as we know, the British Labour Party national executive committee is meeting now to decide their policy on a second referendum. Now, I know you either don't know or won't say how your nominee on the executive is going to vote, and I must admit, having just watched Mick Antoniw interviewed by the BBC, I'm none the wiser either. My question is simply this: what is the current policy of the Welsh Labour Government, because there does seem to be some degree of confusion? You said over the weekend that a confirmatory referendum should be 'in the mix', which prompted Alun Davies AM to say, referring to you: 'Well that wasn't the policy that he asked me to vote for. We agreed as a Labour Group that we would vote for a policy which included a firm commitment to a referendum and @fmwales needs to be delivering on that policy.' Given this disagreement in your own ranks, and even in your own Cabinet, can you set the record straight? Is it your Government's current policy to advocate a confirmatory referendum on any Brexit deal? If a different line emerges from the NEC in London this afternoon, does that then automatically become your Government's new policy?
Welsh: Nawr, fel y gwyddom, mae pwyllgor gweithredol cenedlaethol Plaid Lafur Prydain yn cyfarfod nawr i benderfynu ar eu polisi ar ail refferendwm. Nawr, gwn naill ai nad ydych chi'n gwybod neu'n gwrthod dweud sut y bydd eich enwebai ar y bwrdd gweithredol yn pleidleisio, ac mae'n rhaid i mi gyfaddef, a minnau newydd wylio Mick Antoniw yn cael ei gyfweld gan y BBC, nad wyf innau ddim callach ychwaith. Fy nghwestiwn i yn syml yw hwn: beth yw polisi presennol Llywodraeth Lafur Cymru, oherwydd mae'n ymddangos bod rhywfaint o ddryswch? Dywedasoch dros y penwythnos y dylai refferendwm cadarnhau fod yn rhan o'r drafodaeth, a ysgogodd Alun Davies AC i ddweud, gan gyfeirio atoch chi: Wel nid dyna oedd y polisi y gofynnodd i mi bleidleisio drosto. Fe wnaethom gytuno fel Grŵp Llafur y byddem ni'n pleidleisio dros bolisi a oedd yn cynnwys ymrwymiad cadarn i refferendwm ac mae angen i @fmwales fod yn cyflawni ar y polisi hwnnw. O ystyried yr anghytuno hwn yn eich rhengoedd eich hun, a hyd yn oed yn eich Cabinet eich hun, a allwch chi egluro'r sefyllfa? Ai polisi presennol eich Llywodraeth yw cefnogi refferendwm cadarnhau unrhyw gytundeb Brexit? Os ceir gwahanol neges gan yr NEC yn Llundain y prynhawn yma, a fydd hynny wedyn yn awtomatig yn dod yn bolisi newydd eich Llywodraeth chi?
English: Llywydd, here is the policy: if the UK Parliament cannot unite around an alternative proposition that includes participation in the single market and a customs union, then the only option that remains is to give the decision back to the people. That is the policy - that is the policy as set out in a motion sponsored jointly by his party and mine in front of this National Assembly earlier this year. That is the policy that I voted for - that is the policy that he voted for - and I'm very happy to be able to confirm that it remains the policy of the Government this afternoon.
Welsh: Llywydd, dyma'r polisi: os na all Senedd y DU gytuno ar un cynnig amgen sy'n cynnwys bod yn rhan o'r farchnad sengl ac undeb tollau, yna'r unig ddewis sydd ar ôl yw rhoi'r penderfyniad yn ôl i'r bobl. Dyna'r polisi - dyna'r polisi fel y'i nodwyd mewn cynnig a noddwyd ar y cyd gan ei blaid ef a'm plaid innau gerbron y Cynulliad Cenedlaethol hwn yn gynharach eleni. Dyna'r polisi y pleidleisiais i drosto - dyna'r polisi y pleidleisiodd ef drosto - ac rwy'n falch iawn o allu cadarnhau y prynhawn yma mai dyna yw polisi'r Llywodraeth o hyd.
English: Llywydd, the Environment (Wales) Act 2016 sets the legislative framework for tackling climate change in Wales. Commitments were further strengthened and reinforced in the 'A Low Carbon Wales' document published last month.
Welsh: Llywydd, mae Deddf yr Amgylchedd (Cymru) 2016 yn pennu'r fframwaith deddfwriaethol ar gyfer mynd i'r afael â'r newid yn yr hinsawdd yng Nghymru. Cryfhawyd ac atgyfnerthwyd yr ymrwymiadau ymhellach yn y ddogfen 'Cymru Carbon Isel' a gyhoeddwyd fis diwethaf.
English: First Minister, it's clear that a growing number of people - our young people and, indeed, the older generation concerned for their grandchildren - do not think that the current scale and pace of action to combat climate change is sufficient. I think we've seen, with Extinction Rebellion and the number of people protesting, the number of arrests and, indeed, Greta Thunberg, as an amazing 16-year-old advocate for our environment, manifestations of that strength of feeling. As you say, there's a worldwide movement now to do more and, I think, to go faster. So, I very much welcome the Welsh Government's declaration of a climate emergency but I do believe it needs to be followed by new energy and new action. One key area, I believe, is transport, and I do think we need a more integrated, a much more integrated, transport system in Wales. One great opportunity is the south Wales metro, and I wonder, First Minister, if Welsh Government will now look at whether it's possible to radically strengthen and accelerate the programme of work for that south Wales metro.
Welsh: Prif Weinidog, mae'n amlwg bod nifer gynyddol o bobl - ein pobl ifanc ac, yn wir, y genhedlaeth hŷn sy'n poeni am eu hwyrion a'u hwyresau - nad ydyn nhw'n credu bod maint a chyflymder presennol y camau i frwydro'r newid yn yr hinsawdd yn ddigonol. Rwy'n credu ein bod ni wedi gweld, gydag Extinction Rebellion a nifer y bobl sy'n protestio, y nifer o arestiadau ac, yn wir, Greta Thunberg, fel hyrwyddwr 16 mlwydd oed anhygoel dros ein hamgylchedd, amlygiad o gryfder y teimlad hwnnw. Fel y dywedwch, ceir mudiad byd-eang erbyn hyn i wneud mwy ac, yn fy marn i, i weithredu'n gyflymach. Felly, rwy'n croesawu'n fawr datganiad Llywodraeth Cymru o argyfwng hinsawdd ond credaf fod angen ei ddilyn gydag egni newydd a chamau newydd. Un maes allweddol, yn fy marn i, yw trafnidiaeth, ac rwy'n credu ein bod ni angen system drafnidiaeth fwy integredig, llawer mwy integredig, yng Nghymru. Un cyfle gwych yw metro de Cymru, a tybed, Prif Weinidog, a wnaiff Llywodraeth Cymru edrych nawr i weld a yw'n bosibl cryfhau a chyflymu'n sylweddol y rhaglen waith ar gyfer y metro de Cymru hwnnw.