English: Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer, and I'm grateful to everyone who took part in the debate. Like Mark Drakeford, I was busily seeing this wizard appearing on the horizon with a wand that could change the course of Welsh politics. But the reality here, of course, is that decisions, or a lack of decisions, taken by the Westminster Government have held back two projects that would have been very important to Wales: the electrification to Swansea, and, secondly, the tidal lagoon in Swansea bay. Although I can accept, of course, that the Conservative Party want to defend the Secretary of State for Wales - I accept that the Government here perhaps doesn't want to support a motion of this kind because of inter-governmental issues - I can't accept that it wouldn't be appropriate for us as a democratically elected Parliament to express a view on the performance of the Secretary of State for Wales. It's not unconstitutional to do that. It is political - yes, it's political, but we are here, and we are elected, to be political and to point the finger of political responsibility at where the problem lies. In this case, I want to pick up on one point made by the Cabinet Secretary. I accept what he says. I accept that he has an argument when he says that we shouldn't pass a motion of no confidence in a member of another Parliament, but to go as far as to say that this place can't express no confidence in anyone not elected to this place is going far too far. If a health board in Wales were failing entirely, we would want a vote of no confidence in the administration of that health board, would we not? So, it is appropriate that we use the mechanisms available to us, which are in order, to do that. It takes us into a political mire perhaps, I accept that, but I'm not entirely sure why the Government haven't been more creative in responding to this, rather than deleting all and replacing - which, to all intents and purposes, agrees with the second part of our amendment that we need to make improvement in the inter-governmental machinery - and allowing Labour backbench Members to push that button to say that they have no confidence in Alun Cairns. It's as simple as that, because that, I know, is how most Members on that side of the Chamber feel. Now, everyone has taken part in their -
Welsh: Diolch yn fawr, Dirprwy Lywydd, ac rwy'n ddiolchgar i bawb wnaeth gymryd rhan yn y drafodaeth. Fel Mark Drakeford, roeddwn i'n prysur weld y dewin yma yn ymddangos ar y gorwel oedd â hudlath yn newid cwrs gwleidyddiaeth Cymru. Ond realiti'r peth, wrth gwrs, yw bod penderfyniadau, neu ddiffyg penderfyniadau, gan Lywodraeth San Steffan wedi dal yn ôl dau broject pwysig iawn i Gymru: y trydaneiddio i Abertawe, ac, yn ail, y morlyn llanw ym Mae Abertawe. Er fy mod i'n gallu derbyn, wrth gwrs, bod y Blaid Geidwadol am amddiffyn Ysgrifennydd Gwladol Cymru - rwy'n derbyn nad yw'r Llywodraeth, efallai, yn y fan hyn eisiau cefnogi cynnig fel hwn oherwydd natur rynglywodraethol - nid ydw i'n gallu derbyn nad yw'n briodol i ni fel Senedd ddemocrataidd cael pasio barn ar berfformiad Ysgrifennydd Gwladol Cymru. Nid yw'n anghyfansoddiadol i wneud hynny. Mae yn wleidyddol - ydy, mae yn wleidyddol, ond rydym ni yma, wedi ein hethol, i fod yn wleidyddol ac i roi'r bys o gyfrifoldeb gwleidyddol lle mae'r briw. Ac, yn yr achos yma, rydw i hefyd jest eisiau codi un pwynt a wnaed gan yr Ysgrifennydd Cabinet. Rydw i'n derbyn beth mae e'n ei ddweud. Hynny yw, rydw i'n derbyn bod gyda fe ddadl pan fo'n dweud ddylem ni ddim pasio cynnig o ddiffyg ffydd mewn aelod o Senedd arall, ond mae mynd mor bell â dweud nad yw'r lle yma'n gallu cynnig diffyg ffydd mewn unrhyw un sydd ddim wedi'i ethol i'r lle yma yn mynd yn llawer rhy bell i fi. Pe bai bwrdd iechyd yng Nghymru yn methu'n llwyr, byddem ni eisiau pleidleisio dros ddiffyg ffydd yng ngweinyddiaeth y bwrdd iechyd, oni fyddwn ni ddim? Ac felly mae yn briodol ein bod ni'n defnyddio'r dulliau sydd gyda ni fan hyn, mewn trefn, i wneud hynny. Mae'n mynd â ni i gors wleidyddol, rwy'n derbyn hynny, ond nid ydw i'n siŵr iawn pam nad yw'r Llywodraeth wedi bod yn fwy creadigol wrth ymateb i hyn, mae'n rhaid imi ddweud, yn hytrach na dileu popeth a rhoi rhywbeth yn ei le - sydd, i bob pwrpas, yn cytuno ag ail ran ein gosodiad ni bod angen gwella'r drefn rhynglywodraethol yma - a chaniatáu i feinciau cefn Llafur gael pleidleisio â'r botwm yna i ddweud nad ydyn nhw'n credu yn Alun Cairns. Mae mor syml â hynny, achos dyna rydw i'n gwybod yn wir sydd yng ngwaed y rhan fwyaf o Aelodau'r Llywodraeth. Nawr, mae pawb wedi cyfrannu yn eu -