claim: in a letter to The Times from Lord Krebs and company, essentially telling the newspaper to stop reporting less-than-negative climate stories.
evidences.evidence_id: The New York Times:357
evidences.article: The New York Times
evidences.evidence: Former The New York Times executive editor Bill Keller decided not to report the piece after being pressured by the Bush administration and being advised not to do so by The New York Times Washington bureau chief Philip Taubman.
evidences.votes: NOT_ENOUGH_INFO SUPPORTS
evidences.evidence_id: The New York Times:377
evidences.article: The New York Times
evidences.evidence: During the Iranian nuclear crisis the newspaper minimized the "negative processes" of the United States while overemphasizing similar processes of Iran.
evidences.votes: NOT_ENOUGH_INFO NOT_ENOUGH_INFO
evidences.evidence_id: The Washington Times:114
evidences.article: The Washington Times
evidences.evidence: During the Climatic Research Unit email controversy (also known as "Climategate") in 2009 in the lead-up to the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, the Times wrote in an editorial "these revelations of fudged science should have a cooling effect on global-warming hysteria and the panicked policies that are being pushed forward to address the unproven theory."
evidences.votes: REFUTES NOT_ENOUGH_INFO
evidences.evidence_id: The Washington Times:124
evidences.article: The Washington Times
evidences.evidence: In 1993, the Times published articles purporting to debunk climate change.
evidences.votes: REFUTES NOT_ENOUGH_INFO
evidences.evidence_id: The Washington Times:7
evidences.article: The Washington Times
evidences.evidence: It has also published many columns which reject the scientific consensuses on climate change, on ozone depletion, and on the harmful effects of second-hand smoke.
evidences.votes: SUPPORTS NOT_ENOUGH_INFO