claim: “[T]he 1079 emails and 72 documents seem indeed evidence of a scandal  involving most of the most prominent scientists pushing the man-made  warming theory - a scandal that is one of the greatest in modern  science.
evidences.evidence_id: Climatic Research Unit email controversy:278
evidences.article: Climatic Research Unit email controversy
evidences.evidence: Writing for Newsweek, journalist Sharon Begley called the controversy a "highly orchestrated, manufactured scandal", noting that the public was unlikely to change their mind.
evidences.votes: REFUTES SUPPORTS
evidences.evidence_id: Climatic Research Unit email controversy:286
evidences.article: Climatic Research Unit email controversy
evidences.evidence: He said that it was not a single scandal, but "a sustained and coordinated campaign" aimed at undermining the credibility of the science.
evidences.votes: SUPPORTS SUPPORTS
evidences.evidence_id: Climatic Research Unit email controversy:303
evidences.article: Climatic Research Unit email controversy
evidences.evidence: An editorial in Nature said that many in the media "were led by the nose, by those with a clear agenda, to a sizzling scandal that steadily defused as the true facts and context were made clear".
evidences.votes: REFUTES SUPPORTS
evidences.evidence_id: Climatic Research Unit email controversy:552
evidences.article: Climatic Research Unit email controversy
evidences.evidence: In blogs, talk radio and other new media, we are told that the warnings about future global warming issued by the national science academies, scientific societies, and governments of all the leading nations are not only mistaken, but based on a hoax, indeed a conspiracy that must involve thousands of respected researchers.
evidences.votes: SUPPORTS SUPPORTS
evidences.evidence_id: Climatic Research Unit email controversy:70
evidences.article: Climatic Research Unit email controversy
evidences.evidence: In this context, John Tierney of The New York Times wrote: "these researchers, some of the most prominent climate experts in Britain and America, seem so focused on winning the public-relations war that they exaggerate their certitude – and ultimately undermine their own cause".
evidences.votes: SUPPORTS SUPPORTS