claim: Greenpeace didn’t save the whales, switching from whale oil to petroleum and palm oil did
evidences.evidence_id: Greenpeace:124
evidences.article: Greenpeace
evidences.evidence: Greenpeace is also critical of extracting petroleum from oil sands and has used direct action to block operations at the Athabasca oil sands in Canada.
evidences.votes: REFUTES NOT_ENOUGH_INFO
evidences.evidence_id: Greenpeace:171
evidences.article: Greenpeace
evidences.evidence: Another Greenpeace movement concerning the rain forests is discouraging palm oil industries.
evidences.votes: SUPPORTS NOT_ENOUGH_INFO
evidences.evidence_id: Greenpeace:189
evidences.article: Greenpeace
evidences.evidence: Greenpeace is also calling Wilmar out for breaking the commitment to end deforestation policy signed by Wilmar in December 2013 where they promise to incorporate organic and sustainable ways to collect palm oil.
evidences.votes: REFUTES NOT_ENOUGH_INFO
evidences.evidence_id: Greenpeace:192
evidences.article: Greenpeace
evidences.evidence: Brands cannot let this deception pass unchallenged and have no choice but to suspend all business with Wilmar until it can prove it only trades clean palm oil from responsible producers."
evidences.votes: REFUTES NOT_ENOUGH_INFO
evidences.evidence_id: Petroleum:296
evidences.article: Petroleum
evidences.evidence: James S. Robbins has argued that the advent of petroleum-refined kerosene saved some species of great whales from extinction by providing an inexpensive substitute for whale oil, thus eliminating the economic imperative for open-boat whaling.
evidences.votes: SUPPORTS REFUTES