Abstract 3773: Bladder cancer risk stratification with the Oncuria 10 plex bead-based urinalysis assay using three different Luminex xMAP instrumentation platforms
Authors: Sunao Tanaka, Toru Sakatani, Kaoru Murakami, Richard T. Waldron, Walter Morales, Wayne Hogrefe, Charles J. Rosser, Hideki Furuya
Journal: Cancer Research (2024)

Abstract Introduction and Objectives: Oncuria® is a bead-based multiplex fluorescence immunoassay that coordinately measures 10 protein biomarkers in urine samples. The current study compared assay performance and output when urine samples were evaluated with the Oncuria assay using three different fluorescence-analyzing instruments commonly used in diagnostic laboratories worldwide. Methods: We compared the performance of the clinically validated Oncuria bladder cancer (BC) multiplex immunoassay when data output was generated on three different analyzer systems. Voided urine samples from 36 subjects (18 with BC and 18 Controls) were reacted with Oncuria test reagents in three 96 well microtiter plates, and consecutively evaluated on the LED/image based MagPix, and laser/flow based Luminex 200 and FlexMap 3D (all xMAP instruments from Luminex Corp., Austin, TX). The BC assay uses magnetic bead based fluorescence technology (xMAP, Multi-analyte profiling; Luminex) to simultaneously quantify 10 protein analytes in urine specimens [i.e., angiogenin (ANG), apolipoprotein E (ApoE), carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), CXCL8/interleukin-8 (IL-8), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), matrix metalloproteinase-10 (MMP-10), serpin A1/alpha-1 anti-trypsin (A1AT), serpin E1/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), CD138/syndecan-1 (SDC1), and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A)]. Results: All three platforms categorized all 10 analytes in identical samples at nearly identical concentrations, with variance across systems typically &amp;lt;5%. While the most contemporary instrument, the FlexMap 3D, output higher raw fluorescence values than the two comparator systems, standard curve slopes and analyte concentrations determined in urine samples were concordant across all three units. Forty-four percent of BC samples registered ≥1 analyte above the highest standard concentration, i.e., A1AT (n=7/18), IL-8 (n=5), and/or ANG (n=2). In Controls, A1AT was higher in one sample. Conclusions: In conclusion, the Oncuria BC assay performed similarly well across three different flow analysis platforms for all 10 analytes simultaneously evaluated in urine samples. This agreement across instruments indicates that the test is amenable to standardized performance in laboratories using existing xMAP, without requiring costly outlays for new equipment. Citation Format: Sunao Tanaka, Toru Sakatani, Kaoru Murakami, Richard T. Waldron, Walter Morales, Wayne Hogrefe, Charles J. Rosser, Hideki Furuya. Bladder cancer risk stratification with the Oncuria 10 plex bead-based urinalysis assay using three different Luminex xMAP instrumentation platforms [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3773.