Abstract GS01-03: Adding atezolizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III triple-negative breast cancer is unlikely to improve efficacy: interim analysis of the ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 phase 3 trial
Authors: Michail Ignatiadis, Andrew Bailey, Heather McArthur, Sarra El-Abed, Evandro de Azambuja, Otto Metzger, Steve Chui, Max Dieterich, Thomas Perretti, Guenther Steger, Jacek Jassem, Soo Chin Lee, Michaela Higgins, José Zarbá, Marcus Schmidt, Henry Gomez, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Luca Moscetti, Joanne Win Yang Chiu, Carter DuFrane, Vanessa Honvault, Rosa Altarcheh, Luciana Molinero, Andrew Ellingson, Elisabetta Munzone, Noa Efrat Ben-Baruch, Emilio Bajetta, Shinji Ohno, Seock-Ah Im, Gustavo Werutsky, Einav Gal-Yam, Xavier Gonzalez-Farré, Ling-Ming Tseng, William Jacot, Oleg Gluz, Zhimin Shao, Yaroslav Shparyk, Ivan Sinielnikov, Zimina Anastasia, Aleksandr Vasiliev, Esther Shearer-Kang, Eric Winer, Diogo Martins-Branco, Shona Fielding, David Cameron, Giuseppe Viale, Shigehira Saji, Richard Gelber, Martine Piccart
Journal: Cancer Research (2024)

Abstract Background: Early stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with a high risk of distant relapse. ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 is a global, prospective, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial that investigated the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic profile of adjuvant atezolizumab plus standard anthracycline/taxane chemotherapy (arm A) versus chemotherapy alone (arm B) in early-stage TNBC. Methods: ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 (NCT03498716) aimed to randomize (1:1) 2300 patients with operable stage II-III TNBC, confirmed by central pathology review. Patients were stratified by type of surgery (breast conserving versus mastectomy), nodal status (0 versus 1-3 versus &amp;gt;=4 nodes), and centrally assessed PD-L1 status (IC 0 vs &amp;gt;=1% ). Adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 for 12 weeks followed by dose dense anthracycline (epirubicin 90 mg/m2 or doxorubicin 60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 for 4 doses every 2 weeks given concomitantly with atezolizumab 840 mg every 2 weeks followed by maintenance atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks until completion of 1 year of atezolizumab (Arm A) or the same chemotherapy regimen (T-EC/AC) alone (Arm B). The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival (iDFS); secondary endpoints included, iDFS in the PD-L1 positive and lymph node-positive subpopulations, overall survival, safety, patient functioning and health related quality of life (HRQoL). On the 14th of November 2022, following an IDMC recommendation, the study accrual was temporarily stopped. In February 2023, the protocol was amended in order for the IDMC to perform an early interim analysis of efficacy and futility, at approximately 62% of the planned (390) iDFS events. The futility boundary was set to a Hazard Ratio (HR) &amp;gt; 1. Results: The IDMC recommendations of 15th March 2023 reported that the primary endpoint crossed the futility boundary, accrual to the study was permanently stopped and the experimental treatment was discontinued. Between August 2018 and November 2022, the study enrolled 2199 patients, with 1101 randomised to the atezolizumab arm (A) and 1098 to the control arm (B). At a median follow-up of 25.3 months, 239 (10.9%) iDFS events were observed in the 2199 enrolled patients; 127 versus 112 iDFS events were observed (61.3% of 390) in the A versus B arms respectively, HR 1.12, (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.87, 1.45). In the PD-L1 positive subgroup, (1567/2199 patients, 71.3%), 77 versus 73 iDFS events were observed in the A versus B arms respectively, HR 1.03, (95% CI 0.75, 1.42). Among patients with lymph node positive tumors (1066/2199 patients, 48.5%), 86 versus 66 iDFS events were observed in the A versus B arm respectively, HR 1.41, (95% CI 1.02, 1.96). Incidence of adverse events grade &amp;gt;=3 was 58.01% versus 48.15% in the A versus B arms, including death in 1.01% (11) and 0.55% (6) of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Crossing the pre-specified futility boundary of HR &amp;gt; 1 provides evidence that adjuvant atezolizumab is very unlikely to improve invasive disease-free survival when added to adjuvant anthracycline and taxane based chemotherapy in patients with stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer. With longer treatment exposure in the atezolizumab arm (A), adverse events were more frequent but consistent with the atezolizumab safety profile. No new or unexpected safety issue was identified. Citation Format: Michail Ignatiadis, Andrew Bailey, Heather McArthur, Sarra El-Abed, Evandro de Azambuja, Otto Metzger, Steve Chui, Max Dieterich, Thomas Perretti, Guenther Steger, Jacek Jassem, Soo Chin Lee, Michaela Higgins, José Zarbá, Marcus Schmidt, Henry Gomez, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Luca Moscetti, Joanne Win Yang Chiu, Carter DuFrane, Vanessa Honvault, Rosa Altarcheh, Luciana Molinero, Andrew Ellingson, Elisabetta Munzone, Noa Efrat Ben-Baruch, Emilio Bajetta, Shinji Ohno, Seock-Ah Im, Gustavo Werutsky, Einav Gal-Yam, Xavier Gonzalez-Farré, Ling-Ming Tseng, William Jacot, Oleg Gluz, Zhimin Shao, Yaroslav Shparyk, Ivan Sinielnikov, Zimina Anastasia, Aleksandr Vasiliev, Esther Shearer-Kang, Eric Winer, Diogo Martins-Branco, Shona Fielding, David Cameron, Giuseppe Viale, Shigehira Saji, Richard Gelber, Martine Piccart. Adding atezolizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III triple-negative breast cancer is unlikely to improve efficacy: interim analysis of the ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 phase 3 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr GS01-03.