Assessment of plasma cell-free DNA fragmentation for multi-cancer early detection: An independent clinical validation study.
Authors: Wei Guo, Yunlong Hu, Wei Wang, Yanqing Zhou, Zuoquan Yang, Heng An, Qing Yang, Yanhua Lv, Chao Lu, Xiaoni Zhang, Mingyan Xu, Yong Xia, Ling Ji, Shifu Chen
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

e15037 Background: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the circulation has gained significant attention due to its potential applications for non-invasive early cancer detection. Fragmentomics of cfDNA is emerging as a promising field of biomarker research, exhibiting the capability to sensitively detect multiple cancer types. In previous retrospective research, we developed an approach called PatternWGS for comprehensive analysis of cfDNA fragmentation patterns and presented a multi-cancer detection model. In this study, we aim to evaluate the performance of PatternWGS in an independent validation cohort including lung, breast, colorectal, liver, and gastric cancers from a new clinical center. Methods: Participants with confirmed diagnosis of lung, breast, colorectal or liver cancer were enrolled in the cancer group. Non-cancer participants without known presence of malignancies were recruited from the same clinical center. Plasma samples from patients with lung (n=47), breast (n=19), colorectal (n=14), liver (n=8) and gastric (n=6) cancers, along with 101 non-cancer individuals were collected in this study. cfDNA was isolated from plasma and stored within a month prior to the whole genome sequencing. The characteristics of cfDNA fragmentation integrating fragment size profiles, motif patterns, genomic coverage distributions were utilized to evaluate the performance for cancer signal detection. In addition, the performance of estimated cfDNA tumor fraction, using copy number aberrations (ichorCNA), was compared with our approach. Results: 94 patients with one of five types of cancers and 101 non-cancer controls were prospectively enrolled between July 2023 and November 2023. Among the cancer group, 64% were at early stages (Stage I: 48%, Stage II: 16%). A significantly higher proportion of shorter fragments was observed in cancer group, and the degree increased with increasing cancer stage. Overall sensitivity across cancer types and stages was 72.3%, and the specificity for non-cancer controls was 80%. As expected, the sensitivity of cancer detection is higher in late-stage patients compared to those in the early-stages (61% in stage I, 80% in stage II, 84.6% in stage III, and 91.7% in stage IV). The sensitivity of detecting lung (72% had stage I cancer), breast, colorectal, liver, and gastric cancers reached 57.4%, 84.2%, 85.7%, 87.5% and 100% respectively. The detection performance using cfDNA tumor fraction by ichorCNA demonstrated a relatively low overall sensitivity of 28.7% (24.6% for stage I-II, 44% for stage III-IV). Conclusions: This independent clinical validation study, which focused on exploring plasma cfDNA fragmentation, demonstrated ideal performance in early-stage cancer detection. The cfDNA fragmentation-based approach exhibited a superior sensitivity in detecting early cancer signals compared with copy number aberrations-based approach.