Abstract 3858: Peripheral CD38+ effector memory (EM) T cells are dynamic biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (NeoICB) in patients (pts) with resectable dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS)
Authors: Elise F. Nassif, Hsinyi Lu, Michael Stanford, Karen Millerchip, Diana Romero, Jared Malke, Brenna Matejka, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Susmita Kumari, Duncan H. Mak, Angelique J. Lin, Jared K. Burks, Wei-Lien Wang, Alexander J. Lazar, Neeta Somaiah, Cara Haymaker, Christina L. Roland, Emily Z. Keung
Journal: Cancer Research (2024)

Abstract Introduction: NeoICB is a promising approach for pts with DDLPS and UPS. However, biomarkers to identify which pts benefit from this treatment and understanding the mechanisms of response and resistance to ICB remains a challenge. Methods: We conducted a randomized phase 2 trial of neoICB (anti-PD1 +/- CTLA4) in pts with resectable DDLPS (n=17) and UPS (n=10). Pts with UPS received concurrent neoICB and radiation. The primary endpoint of the trial was pathological response; 3 DDLPS and 9 UPS pts were responders (R) and 14 DDLPS and 1 UPS pts were non-responders (NR). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected at baseline, prior to cycle 2 of neoICB (C2D1), and at the time of surgery (SURG). We performed mass cytometry (CyTOF) to identify immune cells associated with response and their dynamic changes with neoICB. We designed a custom 41-parameter panel using CD45 live cell barcoding with 31 markers for immune profiling, of which 23 were selected to detect key cell lineage and 8 to detect signaling markers. Batch correction and high dimensional data analyses were performed using CyCombine and CyTOF workflow R packages. Longitudinal comparisons between immune cell populations were conducted using Mann-Whitney U Test. Results: Of 79 available PBMC samples from 27 pts, 63 passed quality control after thawing (≥30% viability) and data clean-up (at least 10,000 events). Data was down-sampled to 5000 events for analysis. Of 19 immune cell types identified, monocytes were the most common followed by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. There was an early increase in CD38+ effector/effector memory (EM) T cells at C2D1 in pts with DDLPS (CD8+ p=0.005, CD4+ p&amp;lt;0.001) and a similar increase observed in pts with UPS (CD8+ C2D1 p=NS, SURG p=0.034; CD4+ C2D1 p=0.024, SURG p=0.06) and these cells had higher Ki67 expression than CD38- T cells (p&amp;lt;0.005). At baseline, R pts with DDLPS had higher fractions of CD38+ EM CD8+ T cells than NR pts (p=0.044). Analysis in the UPS cohort was limited by the low number of NR pts. Higher expression of TIGIT was observed on CD38+ EM CD8+ T cells compared to CD38- counterparts at all time points. Conclusion: Peripheral CD38+ EM CD8+ T cells are associated with response to neoICB in pts with DDLPS. Longitudinal peripheral immune profiling reveals an increase in CD38+ EM CD8+ and CD4+ T cells with neoICB in pts with DDLPS and UPS. These cells are proliferative and express higher levels of TIGIT, which could be a future target for therapeutic exploration. Importantly, changes in the peripheral immune populations may precede changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) as preliminary analyses of the TME did not identify early (C2D1) changes. TME imaging mass cytometry analyses are currently underway to associate peripheral and intratumor changes in immune populations. Citation Format: Elise F. Nassif, Hsinyi Lu, Michael Stanford, Karen Millerchip, Diana Romero, Jared Malke, Brenna Matejka, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Susmita Kumari, Duncan H. Mak, Angelique J. Lin, Jared K. Burks, Wei-Lien Wang, Alexander J. Lazar, Neeta Somaiah, Cara Haymaker, Christina L. Roland, Emily Z. Keung. Peripheral CD38+ effector memory (EM) T cells are dynamic biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (NeoICB) in patients (pts) with resectable dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3858.