Intravascular Imaging and Angiography Guidance in Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Diabetes
Authors: Ki Hong Choi, Taek Kyu Park, Young Bin Song, Joo Myung Lee, Jong-Young Lee, Seung-Jae Lee, Sang Yeub Lee, Sang Min Kim, Kyeong Ho Yun, Jae Young Cho, Chan Joon Kim, Hyo-Suk Ahn, Hyuck-Jun Yoon, Yong Hwan Park, Wang Soo Lee, Jin-Ok Jeong, Pil-Sang Song, Joon-Hyung Doh, Sang-Ho Jo, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Min Gyu Kang, Jin-Sin Koh, Kwan Yong Lee, Young-Hyo Lim, Yun-Hyeong Cho, Jin-Man Cho, Woo Jin Jang, Kook-Jin Chun, David Hong, Jeong Hoon Yang, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Joo-Yong Hahn, Chang-Wook Nam, Hyun-Jong Lee, Dong Ryul Ryu, Kyu Tae Park, Kiyuk Chang, Seonwoo Kim, Dong-Yeon Kim, Suyoun Shin, Jinshil Kim, Jaeyoung Park, Seunghyun Lee, Euna Kim, Hyein Kang, Su Jin Hwang, Yeonhui Lee, Hyun Seung Joh, Se Young Im
Journal: JAMA Network Open (2024)

Importance Data are limited regarding the effects of intravascular imaging guidance during complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes. Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of intravascular imaging–guided vs angiography-guided complex PCI in patients with or without diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants This prespecified secondary analysis of a subgroup of patients in RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance Versus Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), an investigator-initiated, open-label multicenter trial, analyzed enrolled patients who underwent complex PCI at 20 sites in Korea from May 2018 through May 2021. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to undergo either the intravascular imaging–guided PCI or angiography-guided PCI. Data analyses were performed from June 2023 to April 2024. Interventions Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed either under the guidance of intravascular imaging or angiography alone. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was target vessel failure (TVF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Results Among the 1639 patients included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [10.2] years; 1300 males [79.3%]), 617 (37.6%) had diabetes. The incidence of TVF was significantly higher in patients with diabetes than patients without diabetes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.33-2.60; P &amp;amp;lt; .001). Among patients without diabetes, the intravascular imaging–guided PCI group had a significantly lower incidence of TVF compared with the angiography-guided PCI group (4.7% vs 12.2%; HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.25-0.67]; P &amp;amp;lt; .001). Conversely, in patients with diabetes, the risk of TVF was not significantly different between the 2 groups (12.9% vs 12.3%; HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.60-1.57]; P = .90). There was a significant interaction between the use of intravascular imaging and diabetes for the risk of TVF ( P for interaction = .02). Among patients with diabetes, only those with good glycemic control (hemoglobin A 1c level ≤7.5%) and who achieved stent optimization by intravascular imaging showed a lower risk of future ischemic events (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.82; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance In this secondary analysis of a subgroup of patients in the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI trial, intravascular imaging guidance reduced the risk of TVF compared with angiography guidance in patients without diabetes (but not in patients with diabetes) during complex PCI. In patients with diabetes undergoing complex PCI, attention should be paid to stent optimization using intravascular imaging and glycemic control to improve outcomes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03381872