tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Survival outcomes in patients with resectable gastric cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy.
Authors: Yun Song, Yuki Hirata, Jaffer A. Ajani, Mariela A. Blum Murphy, Jenny Jing Li, Prajnan Das, Bruce D. Minsky, Paul F. Mansfield, Naruhiko Ikoma, Brian D. Badgwell
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

338 Background: Perioperative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer. However, the use of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), which includes both chemotherapy and chemoradiation, is increasing in other malignancies. The purpose of this study is to determine overall survival (OS) in a contemporary cohort of gastric cancer patients treated with TNT and surgical resection. Methods: Patients diagnosed with microsatellite-stable clinical T2+ or N+ gastric adenocarcinoma (January 2012 to June 2022) were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Those who underwent staging laparoscopy and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation therapy, followed by gastrectomy, were included in the study. OS and variables associated with OS were determined using standard statistical methods. Results: Of 203 study patients, the median (interquartile range) age was 61 (50-69.5) years and 50 (24.6%) had tumor involving the gastroesophageal junction. The most common TNT sequence was chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation, which was utilized in 173 (85.2%) patients. The chemotherapy regimen typically given was fluorouracil and oxaliplatin in 149 (73.4%) patients. The most common radiation dose was 45 Gy in 25 fractions (169 [83.3%] patients), with 18 (8.9%) patients receiving 30 Gy in 10 fractions. One hundred ninety-seven (97.0%) patients completed all their planned neoadjuvant therapy. Surgical resection included total gastrectomy in 108 (53.2%), adjacent organ resection in 24 (11.8%), and extended (D1+/D2) lymphadenectomy in 193 (95.1%) patients. Pathologic complete response was achieved (pCR) in 32 (15.8%) patients. The median OS was 8.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5-not reached) years, and the 5-year OS rate was 65.2% (95% CI 57.8-73.5%). Patients with pCR had a 5-year OS rate of 89.1% (95% CI 78.1-100.0%). On multivariable analysis, D1+/D2 lymphadenectomy (HR 0.21 [95% CI 0.088-0.51]), post-treatment pathologic (yp) T (ypT3 vs ypT0, HR 3.11 [95% CI 1.09-8.82]; ypT4 vs ypT0, HR 5.51 [95% CI 1.64-18.5]) and N stages (ypN1 vs ypN0, HR 2.41 [95% CI 1.13-5.13]; ypN2 vs ypN0, HR 2.43 [95% CI 1.14-5.20]; ypN3 vs ypN0, HR 4.70 [95% CI 2.09-10.6]), incidental distant metastasis at time of resection (HR 3.75 [95% CI 1.50-9.37]), and postoperative complications (HR 2.06 [95% CI 1.21-3.52]) were associated with OS. Conclusions: TNT is associated with a high rate of treatment completion and promising long-term OS for patients with resectable gastric cancer. Comparative studies with perioperative treatment and predictors of tumor response will be important in identifying patients suitable for TNT.
NRG-GI008: Colon adjuvant chemotherapy based on evaluation of residual disease (CIRCULATE-NORTH AMERICA).
Authors: Christopher Hanyoung Lieu, Guan Yu, Scott Kopetz, Shannon L. Puhalla, Peter C. Lucas, Ibrahim Halil Sahin, Dustin A. Deming, Philip A. Philip, Theodore S. Hong, Yesenia Rojas-Khalil, Jonathan M. Loree, Norman Wolmark, Greg Yothers, Thomas J. George, Arvind Dasari
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

TPS243 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (SignateraÔ, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines vs. serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively or with serial monitoring (Cohort B) will be randomized to FP+Ox vs. more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate vs. delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox vs FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Support: U10-CA-180868, -180822; UG1CA-189867; Natera, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .
Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan and nivolumab as third- or later-line treatment for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer: A single-institution retrospective study.
Authors: Keitaro Shimozaki, Izuma Nakayama, Daisuke Takahari, Kengo Nagashima, Koichiro Yoshino, Koshiro Fukuda, Shota Fukuoka, Hiroki Osumi, Mariko Ogura, Takeru Wakatsuki, Akira Ooki, Eiji Shinozaki, Keisho Chin, Kensei Yamaguchi
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

265 Background: Despite the difficulty of directly comparing trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and nivolumab as third- or later-line treatment for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in randomized trials, discussions regarding optimal treatment strategies are desired. Methods: This single-institution retrospective study aimed to describe the real-world efficacy and safety of T-DXd and nivolumab as third- or later-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive AGC treated between March 2016 and May 2022. Results: Overall, 58 patients (median age, 64 years; 69% male) were eligible (T-DXd group, n = 20; nivolumab group, n = 38). Most had HER2 3+ (72%) and presented with metastatic disease at diagnosis (66%). Response rates in the 41 patients with measurable lesions were 50% and 15% in the T-DXd and nivolumab groups, respectively. The T-DXd and nivolumab groups had a median progression-free survival of 4.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3–7.0) and 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.5–3.5), median overall survival of 10.8 months (95% CI, 6.9–23.8) and 11.7 months (95% CI, 7.6–17.1), and grade 3 or greater adverse event rates of 50% and 2%, respectively. Overall, 64% received subsequent treatment. Among 23 patients who received both regimens, the T-DXd–nivolumab and nivolumab–T-DXd groups had a median overall survival of 14.0 months (95% CI, 5.0–not reached) and 19.3 months (95% CI, 9.5–25.1), respectively. Conclusions: T-DXd and nivolumab had distinctive efficacy and toxicity profiles as third- or later-line treatment for HER2-positive AGC. Considering the distinct features of each regimen might help clinicians personalize the optimal treatment approaches for patients with HER2-positive AGC.
A phase I study of EO-3021 in adult patients with solid tumors likely to express CLDN18.2.
Authors: Meredith Pelster, Cesar Augusto Perez, Sreenivasa R Chandana, Nataliya Volodymyrivna Uboha, Ashwin Swami, Holly McDonald, Jaya Srivastava, Minal A. Barve
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

TPS429 Background: Claudin 18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) belongs to a family of tight junction proteins with broad expression in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), pancreatic, esophageal, and other solid tumors. Expression of CLDN18.2 in normal tissue is limited to the gastric mucosa, making it a promising antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) therapeutic target. Currently, there are no approved therapies targeting CLDN18.2. EO-3021 (also known as SYSA1801) is an ADC comprised of a fully human CLDN18.2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) specifically conjugated at glutamine 295 with a cleavable linker and MMAE with a homogenous drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) of 2. In preclinical models, EO-3021 selectively delivers a potent cytotoxic MMAE payload directly to cancer cells expressing CLDN18.2, retains antibody-dependent cellular toxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) activity, and exhibits a bystander effect. 1 In an ongoing Phase 1 study in China (NCT05009966), EO-3021 exhibited signs of anti-tumor activity in patients with gastric cancer and had an acceptable safety profile. 2 Outside of Greater China, EO-3021 is being evaluated by Elevation Oncology for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors likely to express CLDN18.2, particularly gastric and GEJ adenocarcinomas. Methods: This is a Phase I, open-label, multi-center, dose escalation and expansion study to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary anti-tumor activity of EO-3021 in patients with solid tumors likely to express CLDN18.2 (NCT05980416). Patients whose tumors have progressed on or after standard therapy, or who are intolerable for available standard therapy are eligible for participation. Approximately 120 patients will be enrolled in this study. There are 4 planned dose levels in the dose finding portion of the study. Patients will receive EO-3021 intravenously (IV) once every three weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The expansion cohort will evaluate EO-3021 in patients with gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Provision of tumor samples (archived and fresh biopsy) is required for study enrollment. CLDN18.2 expression in tumor tissue via will be assessed by retrospective evaluation via central immunohistochemistry assay; results will be explored for possible correlation with tumor response. Enrollment in the dose escalation portion of the study began in August 2023. 1. Dan M, et al. Cancer Res. 83, 2023. 2. Wang Y, et al. J Clin Oncol. 41, 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05980416 .
Natural history of gastric leiomyoma.
Authors: Kwangbeom Park, Ji Yong Ahn, Hee Kyong Na, Kee Wook Jung, Jeong Hoon Lee, Do Hoon Kim, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song, Gin Hyug Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

262 Background: Most gastric leiomyomas are asymptomatic and benign subepithelial tumors (SETs); however, some may increase in size or become symptomatic. Understanding their natural history is therefore important to their management. We investigated the natural history of histologically proven gastric leiomyomas. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed histologically proven gastric leiomyoma cases at a tertiary center. The baseline characteristics of these cases were analyzed, and those with a follow-up period of at least 12 months without immediate resection were evaluated. The primary outcome was the frequency of size increase of more than 25% during the follow-up period, and the secondary outcome was the histopathologic results in cases that underwent resection. Results: Among the 231 patients with histologically proven gastric leiomyomas, the most frequent location was the cardia (77.1%), and the median size was 3 cm (IQR 2–4 cm). Eighty-four cases were followed up over a median period of 50.8 months (IQR 27.2–91.3 months). During the follow-up period, tumor size increased in two cases (2.4%). Surgical results showed that one case was leiomyoma, and the other was leiomyosarcoma. Among the remaining cases without change in size, 15 underwent surgical resection (n = 10) or endoscopic resection (n = 5), and all cases were confirmed as leiomyoma. Conclusions: Most gastric leiomyomas are benign SETs, and an increase in size is not frequent, even in large-sized cases. Close monitoring with routine follow-up without resection may be sufficient in cases of histologically proven gastric leiomyoma. However, in cases of ulceration or size increase, resection may be beneficial.
Oncogenic aberrations in primary gastric cancer tumors to predict metachronous peritoneal metastasis.
Authors: Joseph J Zhao, Kiekyong Huang, Daryl K A Chia, Jia Hao Law, Angie Lay Keng Tan, Jimmy Bok Yan So, Patrick Tan, Raghav Sundar
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

392 Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) in gastric cancer (GC) portend a poor prognosis. Yet, there are a paucity of data on underlying genomic alterations predictive of GCPM. Methods: Two-hundred and nine patients who underwent primary tumor (PT) surgical resection were included in the prospective cohort. Whole exome sequencing (WES) of these resected PT GC specimens (average coverage 129X for tumor samples, 70X coverage for matched normal/blood controls) were undertaken. Participants were followed-up longitudinally for peritoneal metastases. Results: Fifty-one (51/209, 24.4%) patients developed PM after a median follow-up duration of 87.0 months and had poorer survival outcomes compared to patients without metastasis (log-rank, p&lt;0.001). Patients with bulkier and more advanced tumors were at increased hazard of PM (T-stage and N-stage stratified analysis, log-rank, p&lt;0.0001). Consistent with known clinical outcomes, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) genomically stable (GS) subtype (log-rank, p=0.0059) and mesenchymal subtype GC were associated with a higher proclivity for peritoneal organotropism (log-rank, p=0.020). Among patients who developed PM, TP53 was the most commonly altered driver mutation (25/51, 49.0%), followed by ARID1A (9/51, 17.6%), CDH1 (8/51, 15.7%), PIK3CA (6/51, 11.8%). Comparing the PTs of patients with PM against those PTs without PM, ELF3, CDH1 and PIGR were significantly associated with PM (all adjusted p&lt;0.05). Amongst TCGA GS tumors, ARID1A mutations (p=0.018) were significantly associated with PM compared to patients with GS tumors with no metastasis. CDH1 mutations were found to significantly co-occur with PIGR and RHOA mutations and was mutually exclusive to TP53. ARID1A mutations were also found to significantly co-occur with multiple other mutations such as PTEN, PIK3CA, ERBB2, and KRAS. Conclusions: CDH1, PIGR, ELF3 mutations in primary GC tumors were found to be significantly associated with metachronous PM.
Quality of life (QOL) for patients with esophageal cancer receiving trimodality therapy with induction chemotherapy, chemoradiation, and surgery: Results from CALGB 80803 (Alliance).
Authors: Karyn A. Goodman, Amylou C. Dueck, Briant Fruth, Anne M. Noonan, Ardaman Shergill, Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, Eileen Mary O'Reilly, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt, David H. Ilson, Teresa L. Deshields
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

283 Background: The randomized phase II CALGB 80803 trial evaluated use of PET imaging for early assessment of induction chemotherapy (iCT) responsiveness to tailor therapy for patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (EC) undergoing trimodality therapy. The primary endpoint of improving pathologic complete response rates using PET-adapted therapy was met. A companion QOL study aimed to characterize patients’ experience through iCT, chemoradiation (CRT) and surgery (S). Methods: Between 11/2011 and 5/2015, 241 eligible patients were randomized to an iCT regimen: modified oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) or carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP), followed by PET scan then CRT, either continuing on the same CT for PET-responders (PET-R) or crossing over to the alternative CT for PET-nonresponders (PET-NR). We prospectively collected QOL domains and symptoms at baseline (T1), after iCT (T2), after CRT (T3), and 3- (T4) and 6- months (T5) after S using the EORTC QLQ-C30, The Esophageal Cancer subscale (EORTC OES18), FACT Neurotoxicity Scale (FACT-NTX), and 6 questions from the PRO-CTCAE. QOL scores were compared between iCT groups and between PET-R and PET-NR at each time point using mixed models. The association of QOL scores at enrollment with overall survival (OS) was tested using Cox regression. Results: 189 patients enrolled on the QOL sub-study, 92 received induction FOLFOX and 97 induction CP. Of those, 110 were PET-R and 79 were PET-NR. 97.9% went on to CRT, and 83.6% underwent S. Global QOL and symptoms statistically significantly worsened from T1 to T2 in 14 of 25 domains, and remained significantly worsened from T1 at: T3 for 19 of 25 domains, T4 for 17 of 25 domains, and T5 for 6 of 25 domains. Changes from T1 significantly favored iFOLFOX (vs iCP) for ability to eat (at T3 and T4), GI symptoms (at T3 and T4), and talking (at T5). Changes from T1 significantly favored iCP (vs iFOLFOX) for neuropathy (at T2, T3, and T4) and coughing (at T5). Proportion of patients reporting worsened PRO-CTCAE scores did not differ between PET-R or PET-NR groups . Multiple QOL domains and symptoms were associated with OS including role functioning, global health status/QOL, appetite loss, pain, dysphagia, and ability to eat (all p&lt;0.002). Conclusions: QOL was impacted most by CRT but returned to baseline 6 months after surgery for most domains. Observed symptom differences did not consistently favor one iCT regimen. Early interventions such as nutritional support and prehabilitation should be studied to improve QOL and OS. Clinical trial information: NCT01333033 .
Consistency and heterogeneity of microsatellite instability (MSI) status in paired biopsy and surgical specimens of colorectal cancer: A necessity for MSI reassessment after treatment?
Authors: Yuan Tang, Wei Cui, Shanshan Shi, Linyong Sun, Baoye Wei, Fei Liu, Yanfeng Xi, Bin Xie, Zhihong Zhang
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

149 Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) plays a crucial role as a cancer immunotherapy and prognosis biomarker, making accurate MSI detection essential. However, currently, there is still a lack of available data on the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on MSI status, as well as validated data on standardized methods for MSI testing in small biopsy samples. The study aimed to investigate the concordance of MSI status between paired biopsy and surgical samples, as well as the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on MSI status using a novel MSI next-generation sequencing (MSI-NGS) detection panel. Methods: A total of 137 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were enrolled for this study, of whom 116 with paired biopsy and surgical samples were analyzed. A custom MSI-NGS panel was employed and its performance was compared to MSI polymerase chain reaction (MSI-PCR), which served as the gold standard. Results: Out of the 116 cases, 112 patients showed consistent MSI status between biopsy and surgical samples, with an overall accuracy of 97% regardless of the detection method used. In the cases with MSI discrepancy (6 cases), 83% (5/6) of the patients showed a transition from MSS to MSI-H from biopsy to surgery. Interestingly, all eight patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy maintained an unchanged MSI status. However, in one patient who received adjuvant treatment and underwent a repeat biopsy after surgery, the MSI status exhibited alterations. Further analysis of clonal evolution revealed that this heterogeneity stemmed from the disappearance of the original clones and the emergence of new clones. Additionally, the NGS panel exhibited strong concordance with MSI-PCR and high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity with an AUC of 0.942 after rigorous validation. Conclusions: The study revealed a high concordance in MSI status between paired biopsy and surgical samples by employing a custom MSI-NGS panel for MSI status detection, providing reliable basis for further research in this field. Moreover, neoadjuvant chemotherapy seemed to have no impact on MSI status in our study, whereas postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy may influence changes in MSI status, highlighting the necessity of reevaluating MSI status after surgery. The findings also underscore the potential of NGS-based MSI detection as a valuable tool for clinical decision-making.
Phase 1/2 trial of vesicular stomatitis virus expressing human interferon-β and NIS (VSV-IFNβ-NIS), with ipilimumab and nivolumab, in patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Authors: Patrick Walsh McGarrah, Shruthi Naik, Thorvardur Ragnar Halfdanarson, Kah Whye Peng, Stephen J. Russell, Julian R. Molina, Alex A. Adjei
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

TPS602 Background: Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is an aggressive malignancy comprising both pulmonary and extrapulmonary primary sites. NEC includes both small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), as well as other neuroendocrine carcinomas arising from any primary organ. A substantial portion (~40%) of NEC arises from gastrointestinal primary sites. The optimal systemic therapy beyond first line platinum and etoposide is not established. There is a critical need to improve upon the median survival in the second line, as most patients do not survive more than 6 months. The efficacy of dual immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs) therapy in NEC shows some promise, but most tumors do not respond. One possible explanation for this is that the tumor microenvironment in NEC is non-inflamed. VSV-IFNβ-NIS is a vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)-based oncolytic virus being tested in multiple early phase clinical trials. Preliminary studies of immune responses in patients receiving VSV-IFNβ-NIS therapy suggest some patients develop T cell responses to viral antigens and known tumor antigens. We hypothesize that VSV-IFNβ-NIS therapy may convert a non-inflamed or immune-excluded phenotype in NEC to a highly inflamed phenotype that sensitizes the tumor to ICIs. Methods: This is a phase 1-2 safety run-in study designed to determine the safety and efficacy of VSV-IFNβ-NIS in combination with dual ICI therapy, ipilimumab and nivolumab, followed by dose expansion in patients with refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or NEC. After a safety run-in, we will be testing the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of VSV-IFNβ-NIS in an expansion cohort of patients with SCLC or NEC of any primary site. Patients must have previously progressed on at least one line of systemic therapy. Prior treatment with checkpoint inhibitors is permitted. Patients are treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab on day 1, followed by one RP2D of 1.0x10^11 TCID50 VSV-IFNβ-NIS on day 4, followed by nivolumab every 3 weeks and ipilimumab every 6 weeks until progression, up to 2 years. The primary objective is to estimate the response rate by RECIST 1.1. Secondary objectives include estimation of disease-control rate, duration or response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety signals. The NEC expansion cohort will seek to enroll 10 patients. If at least one objective response is observed, and safety is confirmed, the regimen will be considered for future study. Clinical trial information: NCT03647163 .