Duration of Untreated Prodromal Psychosis and Cognitive Impairments
Authors: TianHong Zhang, HuiRu Cui, YanYan Wei, XiaoChen Tang, LiHua Xu, YeGang Hu, YingYing Tang, HaiChun Liu, ZiXuan Wang, Tao Chen, ChunBo Li, JiJun Wang
Journal: JAMA Network Open (2024)

Importance The possible association between the duration of untreated prodromal symptoms (DUPrS) and cognitive functioning in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis remains underexplored. Objective To investigate the intricate interplay between DUPrS, cognitive performance, and conversion outcomes, shedding light on the potential role of DUPrS in shaping cognitive trajectories and psychosis risk in individuals at CHR for psychosis. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study of individuals at CHR for psychosis was conducted at the Shanghai Mental Health Center in China from January 10, 2016, to December 29, 2021. Participants at CHR for psychosis typically exhibit attenuated positive symptoms; they were identified according to the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes, underwent baseline neuropsychological assessments, and were evaluated at a 3-year clinical follow-up. Data were analyzed from August 25, 2021, to May 10, 2023. Exposure Duration of untreated prodromal symptoms and cognitive impairments in individuals at CHR for psychosis. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary study outcome was conversion to psychosis. The DUPrS was categorized into 3 groups based on percentiles (33rd percentile for short [≤3 months], 34th-66th percentile for median [4-9 months], and 67th-100th percentile for long [≥10 months]). The DUPrS, cognitive variables, and the risk of conversion to psychosis were explored through quantile regression and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Results This study included 506 individuals (median age, 19 [IQR, 16-21] years; 53.6% [n = 271] women). The mean (SD) DUPrS was 7.8 (6.857) months, and the median (IQR) was 6 (3-11) months. The short and median DUPrS groups displayed poorer cognitive performance than the long DUPrS group in the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test–Revised (BVMT-R) (Kruskal-Wallis χ 2 = 8.801; P = .01) and Category Fluency Test (CFT) (Kruskal-Wallis χ 2 = 6.670; P = .04). Quantile regression analysis revealed positive correlations between DUPrS rank and BVMT-R scores (&amp;amp;lt;90th percentile of DUPrS rank) and CFT scores (within the 20th-70th percentile range of DUPrS rank). Among the 506 participants, 20.8% (95% CI, 17.4%-24.5%) converted to psychosis within 3 years. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis identified lower educational attainment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.912; 95% CI, 0.834-0.998), pronounced negative symptoms (HR, 1.044; 95% CI, 1.005-1.084), and impaired performance on the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery: Mazes (HR, 0.961; 95% CI, 0.924-0.999) and BVMT-R (HR, 0.949; 95% CI, 0.916-0.984) tests as factors associated with conversion. Conclusions and Relevance The finding of this cohort study suggest the intricate interplay between DUPrS, cognitive performance, and conversion risk in individuals at CHR for psychosis. The findings emphasize the importance of considering both DUPrS and cognitive functioning in assessing the trajectory of these individuals.