tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Second primary B-ALL after exposure to lenalidomide for multiple myeloma: A US multicenter study.
Authors: Arjun Lakshman, Jeffrey Lee Jensen, Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Gene Shaw, Dragan Jevremovic, Min Shi, James R Cook, Sara A Monaghan, Jithma P. Abeykoon, Ricardo Parrondo, Peter Leif Bergsagel, Mounzer E. Agha, Sam Rubinstein, Catherine Callaghan Coombs, Sawa Ito, Mithun Vinod Shah, Anjali S. Advani, Linda Baughn, Shaji Kumar
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

7533 Background: Maintenance treatment (rx) with lenalidomide (R) improves overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM). We report a retrospective cohort of patients (pts) with second primary B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) diagnosed after R-rx for MM. Methods: We included pts who were exposed to at least 1 yr of R for MM rx prior to ALL dx. After approval by institutional review board, data were collected by chart review at participating centers using Redcap. OS was the primary endpoint. We used BlueSky statistics v10.3.1 for analysis. Results: Analysis included 33 ALL pts diagnosed from 2014-2022 at 7 sites. 52% pts were female. Median follow up was 9.6 yrs (95%CI,7.6-11.8) from MM dx and 3.2 yrs (CI, 2.1-4.7) from ALL dx. Pt characteristics at MM dx are given in Table. Induction rx included: proteasome inhibitor (PI) +immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) (43%), PI+alkylator (24%), IMiD (18%) &amp; others (15%). 50% pts received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Median OS from MM dx was 11.2 yrs (CI, 8.9-NR). Time from MM dx and initial R rx to ALL dx were 5.0 yrs (range, 2.4-18.5) and 4.4 yrs (2.2-10.6) respectively. Median duration of R exposure before ALL dx was 3.8 yrs (1.6-10.4). Table shows characteristics of pts at B-ALL dx and genetic classification based on karyotyping (n=30), ALL FISH (n=28), chromosomal microarray (n=5) and next-generation sequencing (n=5). 31 pts received ALL-directed rx while 1 pt was initially managed with close observation as the pt attained CR on stopping R ( Lakshman et al; ASH 2019 ). Rx was unknown in 1 pt. Initial rx included: hyper-CVAD+/- rituximab- 49%, pediatric inspired protocols-18%, reduced intensity rx for frail pts- 21% and others- 12%. Response to first line rx were: CR- 56%, CRi- 28%, induction failure- 16%. 32% pts attained measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity. 48% pts underwent SCT for ALL. 14 pts died during follow up. 3-yr OS from ALL-dx was 50% (CI, 33%-76%). 3 pts required rx for MM after ALL diagnosis (2 had allo-SCT for ALL before MM relapse). Conclusions: Most pts had standard risk MM and were exposed to R for several years prior to dx of B-ALL, characterized by high incidence of hypodiploid karyotype; IKZF1 loss and TP53 deletions/mutations were detected in a subset of pts.MRD-adapted timely discontinuation of R in standard risk MM may decrease risk of second primary ALL. [Table: see text]
Racial disparities in major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Authors: Maharshi Raval, Kanishka Uttam Chandani, Siddharth Pravin Agrawal, Ahmed Medhat Eldimllawi, Sajid Siddiq, Ahmed Nadeem, Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, Shahrukh K. Hashmi
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

e19076 Background: Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) is the seventh most prevalent cancer and has sixth highest malignancy mortality in United States. Owing to the advances in treatment of NHL including targeted therapies, the survival of NHL patients has increased over the past decades. However, inequalities may exist in the access to advanced care, clinical trials, and subspecialist appointments in certain patient populations. We aim to study the racial disparities in major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in NHL patients. Methods: Using ICD-10 codes, patients with NHL were identified from National Inpatient Sample 2019 database. We included all-cause in-hospital mortality (ACIHM), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), atrial fibrillation (AF), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and sudden cardiac death (SCD) as MACCE for the outcomes. Baseline characteristics including demographics, comorbidities; and MACCE outcomes were studied using chi-square for categorical or ANOVA for continuous data (statistical significance determined as p-value &lt;0.05) and results were stratified based on patient’s races. Results: Out of the total sample size of 205220 patients admitted with a diagnosis of NHL, 74.94% (153785) were White, 8.95% (18370) were Black, 9.46% (19415) were Hispanic, 3.48% (7140) were Asian/Pacific Islander, 0.42% (875) were Native American, while 2.75% (5635) belonged to other races. When compared to White patients, ACIHM was significantly higher in Black patients with adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.294 (95% CI 1.099-1.523, p=0.002) and Asian/Pacific Islander patients (aOR 1.279, 95% CI 1.005-1.628, p=0.045). Risk of AMI was lower in Black patients (aOR 0.751, 95% CI 0.587-0.96, p=0.023) as compared to White patients. AF risk was significantly lower in Black, Hispanic, and Other race patients compared to White patients. The odds of developing CVA are higher in Asian/Pacific Islander patients (aOR 1.285, 95% CI 1.002-1.649, p=0.048) and of having SCD are higher in Black patients (aOR 2.052, 95% CI 1.5-2.806, p&lt;0.001) when compared to White patients. Conclusions: In patients with NHL, Black patients had higher ACIHM and SCD while Asian/Pacific Islander patients had higher ACIHM and CVA when compared to White patients. Although the reason of disparity is likely multifactorial, the findings of this study highlight the need for development of healthcare strategies stratified by race which may aid to mitigate the increased risk of MACCE in certain races. Further research involving possible genetic influences and social determinants of health contributing to poorer outcomes in Black and Asian/Pacific Islander patients with NHL becomes imperative.
EPCORE FL-2: Phase 3 trial of epcoritamab with rituximab and lenalidomide (R<sup>2</sup>) vs chemoimmunotherapy or R<sup>2</sup> in previously untreated follicular lymphoma.
Authors: Kim M. Linton, Philip Thompson, Stefano Luminari, Carla Casulo, Poliana Patah, Lingmin Zeng, JP Mei, Neha Dixit, Daniela Hoehn, Emmanuel Bachy
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

TPS7084 Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Most patients with advanced-stage FL in need of systemic therapy are treated with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (eg, rituximab [R] or obinutuzumab [G]) with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone [CHOP] or bendamustine [benda]). Recent studies have shown R plus lenalidomide (R 2 ) is a potent FL treatment in the 1L and relapsed or refractory (R/R) settings and is a promising backbone for combination therapies. Epcoritamab, a subcutaneous CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody, received breakthrough therapy designation by the FDA for R/R FL after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy. In the phase 1/2 trial (NCT04663347), epcoritamab plus R 2 demonstrated high complete response (CR) rates in the 1L and R/R settings. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1L epcoritamab plus R 2 vs CIT in patients with FL. Methods: EPCORE FL-2 (NCT06191744) is a global, randomized, open-label phase 3 trial. Eligible adult patients must have CD20+ histologically confirmed classic FL (previously grade 1–3A), stage III or IV disease (or bulky stage II), and in need of systemic treatment by meeting GELF criteria. Approximately 1080 patients will be randomized to 3 treatment arms (Table). Patients achieving CR or PR upon 6 cycles will move to epcoritamab on day 1 of cycles 7–12 (28-day cycles) and 13–21 (56-day cycles). After 120 weeks of treatment, patients will be followed for progression and survival. Dual primary endpoints will be CR rate at 30 months and progression-free survival in arm A vs arm B. Key secondary efficacy endpoints include overall survival, minimal residual disease negativity, and changes in patient-reported outcomes on the physical functioning scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-C30 Questionnaire from baseline to week 25. Safety endpoints include incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs), including AEs of special interest (cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and clinical tumor lysis syndrome). The study is open for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT06191744 . [Table: see text]
Clinical characteristics and independent prognostic factors of patients with mantle cell lymphoma over last two decades with a focus on the interaction between tumor stage and age.
Authors: Shraboni Dey, Pierre Fwelo, Vignesh Nagesh, Izage Kianifar Aguilar, Hadrian Tran, Nikita Wadhwani, Aman Siddiqui, Daniel Elias, Charlene Mansour, Marco Gonzalez, Jevon Lamar Harrison, Oluwasegun Shoewu, Simcha Weissman, Ayrton Bangolo
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

e19065 Background: Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) poses challenges in clinical management due to its rarity and aggressiveness. Understanding its epidemiology and outcomes is crucial. This study examines demographic and clinicopathologic profiles of 746 MCL patients in the USA from 2000-2015, focusing on the interplay between age and tumor stage. Methods: Using SEER data, this retrospective study analyzes demographic and clinical variables to assess mortality risks. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models evaluate overall mortality (OM) and MCL-specific mortality (CSM), identifying independent prognostic factors (HR &gt;1). The study explores age-tumor stage interaction. Results: Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed age as pivotal, with those ≥80 facing higher risks for overall mortality (HR=3.93) and MCL-related mortality (HR=4.02) . Advanced Ann Arbor staging (II, III, IV) predicts heightened risks for both mortality types. Widowed status significantly influences outcomes ,with widowed individuals facing notably higher risks of overall mortality (HR=1.85) and MCL-related mortality (HR=1.81).Stage II and age groups 60-79 and ≥80 show substantial mortality risks, with similar trends in Stage IV combined with these age groups. Intriguingly, Stage III lacks significant age interactions, suggesting heterogeneous clinical profiles and treatment responses compared to patients in Stages II and IV. Therefore, the influence of age on mortality outcomes may be obscured by the complexities inherent in Stage III disease presentation and management. Conclusions: This study underscores age, staging, and marital status as key factors influencing MCL mortality. Widowed status emerges as notable, emphasizing social support's importance. Integrating these insights into clinical practice can enhance risk stratification and guide tailored interventions for improved outcomes. Our findings, particularly the lack of significant interactions between Stage III and age groups, highlight the intricate interplay between age and disease stage in MCL patients. This observation prompts us to advocate for further research aimed at elucidating the underlying mechanisms driving these complex interactions. Understanding the biological and clinical factors that influence the relationship between age and disease stage could provide valuable insights into MCL pathogenesis and progression. Further research in this area is warranted to inform personalized therapeutic approaches and ultimately enhance patient care and outcomes.
In-hospital outcomes of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma with versus without heart failure.
Authors: Gustavo Garcia, Manuel Rosario, Moises Vasquez, Maha Hameed, Ian Vargas, Wilhelmine Wiese-Rometsch, Robert Smith, Jayan Nair
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

e19511 Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is known to improve progression-free survival. However, the outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) are uncertain. This study aims to compare hospital outcomes in patients with MM undergoing ASCT with and without HF. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients with MM undergoing ASCT during hospitalizations between 2016 and 2020. Under IRB exemption, data was extracted using ICD-10 codes. Data were stratified between patient with and without HF. A multivariate regression model was used to estimate the association of HF with ASCT in hospital outcomes, adjusting for statistically significant comorbidities. Results: A total of 30,375 hospitalizations with a diagnosis of MM undergoing ASCT were included, of which 1,535 had HF. On multivariant analysis compared to hospitalization without HF, those with HF had significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-3.24), graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (aOR: 4.02, 95% [CI]: 2.48-6.52), transplant complications (aOR: 2.03, 95% [CI]: 1.62-2.56), sepsis (aOR: 2.279, 95% [CI]: 1.95- 2.65), septic shock (aOR: 3.49, 95% [CI]: 2.71-4.48), cardiogenic shock (aOR: 5.33, 95% [CI]: 2.61- 10.9), cardiac arrest (aOR: 3.78, 95% [CI]: 2.24- 6.35) and ventricular arrhythmia (aOR: 2.81, 95% [CI]: 2.08- 3.78). All p-values were &lt;0.001. Additionally, patients with HF had a longer average length of stay (20.48 vs 16.38 days, p&lt; 0.001) and a higher total cost of hospital stay ($245,831 vs $198,732, p&lt;0.001) compared to those without HF. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation, while also having coexisting heart failure (HF), experienced worse outcomes compared to patients without HF. These patients had a higher risk of transplant complications, GvHD, sepsis, septic shock, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, ventricular arrhythmias and mortality. Additionally, these patients experienced a longer hospital stay with higher healthcare costs. Further interventions and research are warranted to improve outcomes in this group of patients.
Evaluation of elranatamab vs EPd, PVd, or Kd in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and prior anti-CD38–directed therapy: MagnetisMM-32.
Authors: Steven Robert Schuster, Satoshi Ito, Margaret Hoyle, Anne Yver, Fangxin Hong, Gregory Finn
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

TPS7576 Background: Elranatamab (ELRA), a humanized B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-CD3 bispecific antibody, has shown efficacy and manageable safety as a monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This study will evaluate ELRA monotherapy vs elotuzumab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone (EPd), pomalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (PVd), or carfilzomib-dexamethasone (Kd) in patients with RRMM to determine whether ELRA can provide superior clinical benefit. Methods: MagnetisMM-32, a phase 3, open-label, multicenter, randomized study, will enroll ≈492 patients. Patients will receive ELRA (Arm A) or investigator’s choice of EPd, PVd or Kd (Arm B), until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, or study termination. Patients treated with ELRA will receive 2 step-up priming doses followed by weekly doses in a 28-day cycle. Patients who achieve a PR or better for ≥2 months will be eligible for reduced dosing frequency. Patients will be randomized 1:1 (stratified by prior line of therapy [1 vs 2 vs 3/4] and International Staging System disease stage [1/2 vs 3]). Key inclusion criteria include age of ≥18 years, prior multiple myeloma diagnosis with measurable disease (per IMWG criteria), evidence of progressive disease or failure to achieve a response to last line of multiple myeloma therapy, 1 to 4 prior lines of therapy including an anti–CD38 antibody–containing regimen (for ≥2 consecutive cycles) and a lenalidomide-containing regimen (for ≥2 consecutive cycles), adequate bone marrow function, and an ECOG performance status of ≤2. Key exclusion criteria include stem cell transplant ≤12 weeks prior to enrollment; active, uncontrolled infection; prior BCMA-directed or CD3-redirecting therapy; and unable to receive EPd, PVd, or Kd. The primary and key secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) per IMWG criteria and overall survival (OS), respectively. Other secondary endpoints include PFS by investigator, objective response rate, duration of response, time to response by BICR, PFS on next line of therapy per IMWG criteria, MRD negativity rate, safety, pharmacokinetics of ELRA, immunogenicity, and health-related quality of life outcomes. The primary endpoint and OS will be compared statistically between treatment arms by stratified log-rank tests. Clinical trial information: NCT06152575 .
A phase 1/2, open-label, multicenter trial investigating the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antineoplastic activity of IPH6501, a first-in-class NK cell engager, in patients with relapsed and/or refractory CD20-expressing non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Authors: Lorenzo Falchi, Patricia Walker, Peter Presgrave, Gareth P. Gregory, Delphine Marie, A.J. Leyco, Olivier Demaria, François Le Floch, Wouter Hanekom, Cecile Bonin, Carine Paturel, Sonia Quaratino
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

TPS7095 Background: The therapeutic landscape for relapsed and/or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) is evolving to include targeted T-cell based immunotherapies. However, there remains an unmet medical need for patients who are refractory to, relapsing from, or are ineligible for these therapies. Leveraging natural killer (NK) cells emerges as a promising strategy, as demonstrated in a Phase 1 study with IPH6101/SAR’579 in R/R AML (Stein, ASCO 2023; Bajel, ASH 2023), and offers a novel approach that could complement or provide an alternative to T-cell therapies. IPH6501 is a first-in-class tetraspecific antibody-based NK cell engager that simultaneously targets the CD16a and NKp46 receptors on NK cells and CD20 on B-NHL cells. It also includes an engineered IL-2 variant designed with mutations to avoid binding to CD25 (IL-2Rα), limiting Treg activation and potential IL-2 related side effects, whilst inducing NK proliferation. In preclinical animal models, IPH6501 boosted NK cell proliferation and activation, and CD20+ target cell elimination in peripheral blood and tissues, at well-tolerated doses. In samples obtained from R/R B-NHL patients, IPH6501 demonstrated greater killing efficacy compared to a CD3xCD20 T-cell engager, and yet lower cytokine secretion, suggesting a potentially safer profile. Methods: This is a global first-in-human, multicenter, open-label Phase 1/2 study to evaluate the safety profile (DLTs and MTD), tolerability according to NCI-CTCAE v5.0 and to determine the RP2D of IPH6501 for patients with B-NHL (NCT06088654). Secondary objectives are to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile and evaluate the immunogenicity of IPH6501. Eligible subjects are aged ≥18 years with advanced, histologically confirmed, CD20+ B-NHL with an ECOG PS ≤2, and without established alternative therapy. Subjects must have received ≥2 prior systemic therapies which may have included astem cell transplant or CAR-T cell therapy. The Phase 1 part of the study will consist of a dose escalation part which will follow a3+3 design to determine the MTD or the highest dose to be tested as defined in protocol if the MTD has not been reached, and a dose assessment part to randomize ≥2 dose levels to determine the RP2D. The Phase 2 part will enroll one or more cohorts of selected B-cell NHL subtypes to be determined at a later stage. Up to 184 subjects will be enrolled, and the study is open in the United States, Australia and Europe. Clinical trial information: NCT06088654 .
BELLWAVE-011: Phase 3 randomized trial of nemtabrutinib versus ibrutinib or acalabrutinib in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.
Authors: Tamar Tadmor, Toby A. Eyre, Ohad Benjamini, Arvind Chaudhry, Juan Shen, Siyang Leng, Mohammed Z.H. Farooqui, David Lavie
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

TPS7088 Background: Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have significantly improved survival in patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Nemtabrutinib is a reversible noncovalent inhibitor of wild-type and C481-mutated BTK that has shown promising antitumor activity in pts with CLL (Woyach JA et al. Cancer Discovery 2023). In this ongoing trial, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of nemtabrutinib versus investigator’s choice of ibrutinib or acalabrutinib in pts with untreated CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) requiring therapy (NCT06136559). Methods: This randomized, open-label, parallel group, active-controlled phase 3 trial will enroll approximately 1200 pts aged ≥18 years. Eligible pts will have confirmed CLL/SLL with active disease based on the IWCLL criteria, which include one of the following: 1) progressive marrow failure or lymphocytosis, 2) massive, progressive, or symptomatic splenomegaly or lymphadenopathy, 3) autoimmune complications, 4) extranodal involvement, or 5) disease-related symptoms. The study will enroll patients who are treatment naïve, with an ECOG performance status 0-2, adequate organ function, and provide blood, bone marrow, and/or a lymph node sample. Pts are excluded if they have Richter Transformation, central nervous system (CNS) involvement by CLL/SLL, an active second malignancy, or a severe bleeding disorder. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive oral nemtabrutinib 65 mg QD, or investigator’s choice of oral ibrutinib 420 mg QD or acalabrutinib 100 mg BID. Randomization will be stratified by TP53aberration, clinical stage, investigator’s choice of comparator, and region. Treatment will continue on both arms until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal. Disease response assessments by physical examination, constitutional symptoms, imaging, and evaluation of blood and bone marrow will be performed Q12W up to week 97, and Q24W thereafter. Primary efficacy endpoints are objective response (OR) and progression free survival (PFS) by BICR per iwCLL 2018 criteria. Secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) by BICR per iwCLL 2018, and safety. OR will be tested via a non-inferiority comparison, while PFS and OS will be tested for superiority. Adverse events will be monitored throughout the trial and graded per NCI CTCAE v5.0 and iwCLL scales. Enrollment in this trial is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT06136559 .