Intra-arterial tenecteplase after successful endovascular recanalisation in patients with acute posterior circulation arterial occlusion (ATTENTION-IA): multicentre randomised controlled trial
Authors: Wei Hu, Chunrong Tao, Li Wang, Zhongjun Chen, Di Li, Wenhuo Chen, Tingyu Yi, Lihua Xu, Chuanqing Yu, Tao Wang, Xiaoxi Yao, Tao Cui, Guangxiong Yuan, Junfeng Su, Li Chen, Zhiming Zhou, Zhengfei Ma, Junjun Wang, Benxiao Wang, Hongxing Han, Hao Wang, Jie Chen, Peiyang Zhou, Zhihua Cao, Youquan Ren, Xueli Cai, Huaizhang Shi, Guang Zhang, Liping Yu, Xingyun Yuan, Jinglun Li, Guoyong Zeng, Chuyuan Ni, Tong Li, Yingchun Wu, Yuwen Li, Kai Li, Yong Liu, Yao Wang, Yu Jin, Hanwen Liu, Jianshang Wen, Jun Sun, Yuyou Zhu, Rui Li, Chao Zhang, Tianlong Liu, Jianlong Song, Li Wang, Juan Cheng, Adnan I Qureshi, Thanh N Nguyen, Jeffrey L Saver, Raul G Nogueira, Xinfeng Liu
Journal: BMJ (2025)

Abstract Objective To assess whether intra-arterial tenecteplase administered after successful endovascular recanalisation improves outcomes in patients with acute arterial occlusion of the posterior circulation. Design Multicentre randomised controlled trial. Setting 31 hospitals in China, 24 January 2023 to 24 August 2023. Participants 208 patients with successful recanalisation (grade 2b50-3 on the extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale) of an occlusion in the V4 segment of the vertebral artery; proximal, middle, or distal segment of the basilar artery; or P1 segment of the posterior cerebral artery: 104 were randomly allocated to receive tenecteplase and 104 to receive standard care. Interventions Intra-arterial tenecteplase (0.0625 mg/kg, maximum dose 6.25 mg) administered proximal to the residual thrombus (if still present) or distal to the origin of the main pontine perforator branches over 15 seconds, or endovascular treatment only (control group). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was freedom from disability (modified Rankin scale score 0 or 1) at 90 days after randomisation. Primary safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 36 hours and all cause mortality at 90 days. All efficacy and safety analyses were conducted by intention to treat and adjusted for age, pre-stroke modified Rankin scale score, time from onset of moderate to severe stroke (National Institutes of Health stroke scale score ≥6) to randomisation, hypertension, and baseline stroke severity. Results At 90 days, 36 patients (34.6%) in the tenecteplase group and 27 (26.0%) in the control group had a modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1 (adjusted risk ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 2.02; P=0.12). Mortality at 90 days was similar between the tenecteplase and control groups: 29 (27.9%) v 28 (26.9%), adjusted risk ratio 1.13, 0.73 to 1.74. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 36 hours occurred in eight patients (8.3%) in the tenecteplase group and three (3.1%) in the control group (adjusted risk ratio 3.09, 0.78 to 12.20). Conclusions In patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to acute posterior large or proximal vessel occlusion, intra-arterial tenecteplase administered after successful recanalisation was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in combined disability and mortality at 90 days. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05684172 .