Sacubitril/Valsartan in Pediatric Heart Failure (PANORAMA-HF): A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Trial
Authors: Robert Shaddy, Michael Burch, Paul F. Kantor, Susan Solar-Yohay, Tania Garito, Sijia Zhang, Michele Kocun, Chad Mao, Antoinette Cilliers, Xu Wang, Charles Canter, Joseph Rossano, Gonzalo Wallis, Jondavid Menteer, Linda Daou, Jacek Kusa, Kursat Tokel, Daniel Dilber, Zhuoming Xu, Tingting Xiao, Nancy Halnon, Kevin P. Daly, Matthew J. Bock, Warren Zuckerman, Tajinder P. Singh, Manisha Chakrabarti, Aviva Levitas, Michele Senni, Giorgia Grutter, Gi Beom Kim, Jinyoung Song, Hyoung Doo Lee, Ching Kit Chen, Joan Sanchez-de-Toledo, Yuk Law, Suthep Wanitkun, Yanqin Cui, Rui Anjos, Timur Mese, Damien Bonnet
Journal: Circulation (2024)

BACKGROUND: Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), is an established treatment for heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. It has not been rigorously compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in children. PANORAMA-HF (Prospective Trial to Assess the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Neprilysin Inhibitor LCZ696 Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor for the Medical Treatment of Pediatric HF) is a randomized, double-blind trial that evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), safety, and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in children 1 month to &lt;18 years of age with HF attributable to systemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). METHODS: Children with HF attributable to LVSD were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril to assess the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan at 52 weeks of follow-up. The primary end point of the study was to determine whether sacubitril/valsartan was superior to enalapril for the treatment of pediatric patients with HF attributable to systemic LVSD, assessed using a primary global rank end point consisting of ranking patients from worst to best on the basis of clinical events such as death, listing for urgent heart transplant, mechanical life support requirement, worsening HF, New York Heart Association (NYHA)/Ross class, Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS), and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory physical functioning domain. The change from baseline to 52 weeks in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide) was an exploratory end point. RESULTS: A total of 375 children (mean age, 8.1±5.6 years; 52% female) were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan (n=187) or enalapril (n=188). At week 52, no significant difference was observed between the 2 treatment arms in the global rank end point (Mann-Whitney probability, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.47–0.58]; Mann-Whitney odds, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.72–1.14]; P =0.42). At week 52, clinically meaningful reductions were observed in both treatment arms in NYHA/Ross, PGIS, Patient Global Impression of Change, and NT-proBNP, without significant differences between groups. Adverse events were similar between treatment arms (incidence: sacubitril/valsartan, 88.8%; enalapril, 87.8%), and the safety profile of sacubitril/valsartan was acceptable in children. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, sacubitril/valsartan did not show superiority over enalapril in the treatment of children with HF attributable to systemic LVSD using the prespecified global rank end point. However, both treatment arms showed clinically meaningful improvements over 52 weeks. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02678312.