Efficacy and safety of crisaborole ointment, 2%, in participants aged ≥45 years with stasis dermatitis: Results from a fully decentralized, randomized, proof-of-concept phase 2a study
Authors: Jonathan I. Silverberg, Robert S. Kirsner, David J. Margolis, Michael Tharp, Daniela E. Myers, Karen Annis, Daniela Graham, Chuanbo Zang, Bonnie L. Vlahos, Paul Sanders
Journal: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2024)

BackgroundCrisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of crisaborole in stasis dermatitis (SD).MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, decentralized phase 2a study (NCT04091087), 65 participants aged ≥45 years with SD without active ulceration received crisaborole or vehicle (1:1) twice-daily for 6 weeks. The primary end point was percentage change from baseline in total sign score at week 6 based on in-person assessment.ResultsCrisaborole-treated participants had significantly reduced total sign score from baseline versus vehicle based on in-person (nondermatologist) assessment (−32.4% vs −18.1%, P = .0299) and central reader (dermatologists) assessment of photographs (−52.5% vs −10.3%, P = .0004). Efficacy according to success and improvement per Investigator's Global Assessment score and lesional percentage body surface area reached statistical significance based on central reader but not in-person assessments. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders were common all-causality treatment-emergent adverse events with crisaborole.LimitationsSmall sample size and short treatment duration were key limitations. In-person assessment was not conducted by dermatologists.ConclusionCrisaborole improved signs and symptoms of SD and was well tolerated. Central reader assessment represents a promising approach for siteless clinical research. Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of crisaborole in stasis dermatitis (SD). In this randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, decentralized phase 2a study (NCT04091087), 65 participants aged ≥45 years with SD without active ulceration received crisaborole or vehicle (1:1) twice-daily for 6 weeks. The primary end point was percentage change from baseline in total sign score at week 6 based on in-person assessment. Crisaborole-treated participants had significantly reduced total sign score from baseline versus vehicle based on in-person (nondermatologist) assessment (−32.4% vs −18.1%, P = .0299) and central reader (dermatologists) assessment of photographs (−52.5% vs −10.3%, P = .0004). Efficacy according to success and improvement per Investigator's Global Assessment score and lesional percentage body surface area reached statistical significance based on central reader but not in-person assessments. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders were common all-causality treatment-emergent adverse events with crisaborole. Small sample size and short treatment duration were key limitations. In-person assessment was not conducted by dermatologists. Crisaborole improved signs and symptoms of SD and was well tolerated. Central reader assessment represents a promising approach for siteless clinical research.