Abstract PO4-10-10: NAVYA-AI enabled intervention to increase real-world guideline compliant care: Improving NGS testing in breast cancer
Authors: RA Badwe, Premal Thaker, Farzana Begum, Mayukh Acherjee, Gitika Srivastava, Naresh Ramarajan, Shona Nag, Sudeep Gupta, Seema Gulia, Jaya Ghosh, Bhawna Sirohi
Journal: Cancer Research (2024)

Abstract BACKGROUND: Navya-AI is a validated online cancer informatics solution that combines artificial intelligence based analysis of the guidelines and evidence, along with asynchronous expert review. Navya-AI releases preliminary system-generated opinions for patients whose treatment plans fit high confidence based on NCCN Guidelines and prior expert reviews. Prior research (SABCS 2014-2018 and ASCO 2021 showed: 1) 97% concordance of Navya-AI predictions with an academic medical center in India and in the US 2) 80% of patients implement treatment concordant with Navya-AI recommendations on the ground 3) Navya’s NCCN and evidence-based treatment plans reduce the patient waiting times for an expert opinion by an average by 3.5 days. Next generation sequencing (NGS) is an expensive but necessary method for identifying patients for risk reduction and therapy selection in breast cancer (BC). NGS testing can be over-used or under-used, and compliance with NCCN guidelines on patient selection is especially important in resource-constrained settings and Low Middle Income Countries (LMIC) such as India. The aim of this study is to find the physician compliance to NCCN guidelines on NGS testing in India, and how Navya-AI can identify the opportunity for improved care, and improve compliance with guidelines for optimal care. METHODS: From January 2022 to May 2023, Breast Cancer patients receiving Navya-AI treatment plan (based on guidelines and live expert-review) were analyzed. Patients who could afford NGS testing and targeted therapies, and who met the Enhanced tier of NCCN resource stratified guidelines for their care centers were identified. Their records were screened by Navya-AI to assess if they met NCCN criteria for NGS testing for risk reduction or for treatment selection (young age, positive family history, triple negative breast cancer etc.). Treating physicians were then analyzed if they had ordered NGS appropriately, or had missed an opportunity for NGS (undertreatment), or had over-ordered NGS (overtreatment).RESULTS: 521 BC patients who could afford NGS tests received a Navya-AI plan during this period. Of these, 85% were Indian patients (415/521) and were analyzed. Patients were diverse with respect to age,cancer stage, family history of cancer and histology: Age &amp;lt; 35: 6.7%, 35-50: 33%, 51-65: 43.76%, &amp;gt;65: 16.51%; early stage: 21.5%, locally advanced stage: 29.56%,metastatic stage: 47.79% and benign disease: 1%; positive family history of cancer: 37.35%, triple negative BC: 21.9%. Of 415 indian breast cancer patients who could afford testing, NGS testing was indicated in 69.64% (289/415) as per NCCN guidelines. The treating physician was compliant with NCCN guidelines in only 47.95% (199/415) of the cases: 19.2% (80/415) of the time, NGS was indicated and the treating physician ordered the same; 28.67% (119/415) of the time, NGS was not indicated, and the treating physician did not order NGS. The remaining 52% were not compliant with NCCN. Under-treatment was present in 50.36% (209/415) of cases, and was the vast majority of fallouts. Over-treatment was only present in 1.69% (7/415). In all 50.63% (209/415) cases, where NGS was not ordered by the treating oncologist, but was indicated, and affordable to the patient, Navya requested the patient to discuss the risks/benefits of NGS testing with their treating oncologist. CONCLUSION: NGS testing in BC patients has significant impact on risk-reduction, genetic counseling, choice of surgery, and treatment options for adjuvant therapy. Missed opportunities for NGS testing in more than 50% of the patients who can afford the testing and resultant therapies, points to a signficant area where compliance with guidelines and expert opinions can impact outcomes. A 'Technological Earthshot" that significantly increases adoption of guideline-based care is the first and an easy step towards 'Cancer Moonshots'. Citation Format: RA Badwe, Premal Thaker, Farzana Begum, Mayukh Acherjee, Gitika Srivastava, Naresh Ramarajan, Shona Nag, Sudeep Gupta, Seema Gulia, Jaya Ghosh, Bhawna Sirohi. NAVYA-AI enabled intervention to increase real-world guideline compliant care: Improving NGS testing in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-10-10.