Neoadjuvant HPV16-specific arenavirus-based immunotherapy HB-200 plus chemotherapy followed by response-stratified de-intensification in HPV16+ oropharyngeal cancer: TARGET-HPV.
Authors: Ari Joseph Rosenberg, Aditya Juloori, Evgeny Izumchenko, John Cursio, Zhen Gooi, Elizabeth A. Blair, Mark W. Lingen, Nicole Cipriani, Rifat Hasina, Anna Starus, Fred Jones, Christopher Plescia, Corinne Iacobucci, Varsha C. Yarra, Rohan Reddy Katipally, Daniel J. Haraf, Alexander T. Pearson, Everett E. Vokes, Nishant Agrawal
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

6017 Background: The role of immunotherapy in curative viral-mediated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) remains undefined. Human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 positive (+) OPC constitutively expresses viral epitopes that drive antigen-specific anti-tumor immunity, supporting rationale for evaluating neoadjuvant HPV16 directed therapeutics in non-metastatic OPC. HB-200 is an arenavirus-based vector therapy derived from LCMV (HB-201) and Pichinde virus (HB-202) each expressing a non-oncogenic HPV16 E7E6 fusion protein to induce HPV16 specific CD8+ T-cell responses. Building on our OPTIMA II results demonstrating that neoadjuvant chemotherapy/nivolumab led to deep responses in 71% of patients who went on to receive reduced radiation (RT), we hypothesized that adding HB-200 to chemotherapy to drive HPV16-specific anti-tumor immunity would be safe and effective to further deepen responses and facilitate more de-escalation. Methods: In this Phase 1 dose escalation investigator-initiated study, patients with non-metastatic HPV16+ OPC were treated with escalating doses of HB-201 single vector (Arm A) or HB-202/201 alternating vector (Arm B) x3 with neoadjuvant carboplatin AUC5 on day 1 and paclitaxel 100mg/m2 on days 1/8/15 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles. Deep responders (≥50% tumor shrinkage) received transoral robotic surgery (TORS) alone or RT to 50Gy +/- cisplatin, while non-responders (&lt;50% shrinkage) received 50 or 70Gy of RT with cisplatin. Primary objective was safety/tolerability and recommended phase 2 dose of HB-200 with chemotherapy. Additional objectives included deep response rate, circulating tumor (ct) HPV-DNA dynamics, and HPV16-specific T-cell response. Results: Twenty-one patients with HPV16+ OPC were enrolled and treated (Arm A, n=9, 43%; Arm B, n=12, 57%). Median age 57, 91% male, 75% base of tongue, 52% non-smokers, and 33% stage II/III (AJCC 8 th edition). ≥Grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 13 (62%) of patients overall and 3 (14%) non-hematologic during neoadjuvant. There were no Grade 4 AEs reported. All patients completed neoadjuvant HB-200/chemotherapy and response-stratified locoregional treatment. Deep responses following HB-200/chemotherapy were observed in 17/21 (81%) of patients, and in 14/15 (93%) treated on higher dose levels 1 or 2 ( p=0.05). All three patients who underwent TORS had no viable tumor at time of surgery. Two patients (9%) had persistent disease following CRT and underwent salvage surgery with no evidence of disease at last follow-up. ctHPV-DNA and HPV16-specific T-cell response data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant HB-200/chemotherapy is safe and feasible with early efficacy signal in this setting warranting further study. Enrollment to the subsequent randomized phase II part is ongoing (NCT05108870). Clinical trial information: NCT05108870 .