tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Real-world KRAS testing and treatment utilization among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Authors: Simon Blanc, Anupama Vasudevan, Mike Gart, Teena Sura, Aryamaan Shrivastava, Prateesh Varughese, Jeffrey A. Scott
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

e20593 Background: About 30% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been reported to harbor gene mutations of Kirsten rat sarcoma oncogene homologue (KRAS). KRAS testing is recommended at metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) diagnosis and targeted treatment has shown better outcomes among KRAS-positive patients. This study aimed to understand KRAS testing rates among mNSCLC patients and utilization of targeted treatment among KRAS G12C positive patients treated in the community oncology setting. Methods: A random sample of 836 mNSCLC patients from the Integra Connect PrecisionQ de-identified database was included in this retrospective observational analysis, with additional information supplemented by chart curation. The database contains ~80% community oncology and ~20% academic practices with over 3 million cancer patients across 500 sites of care. Eligible patients were those aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with mNSCLC, and who initiated treatment in the second line (2L) setting between 01-May-2021 and 01-Jan-2024. KRAS testing rates and utilization of targeted treatment use were assessed and presented for this study. Results: The median (IQR) age of 836 mNSCLC patients was 68 (62,75) years; 52.9% were female; 73.8% identified as White, 11.7% as African American, 1.9% as Asian, and 12.6% as Other. Testing for KRAS was reported in 749 (89.6%) of the mNSCLC patients any time during the evaluation period, with most of them (738/749) tested before 2L treatment initiation; 186/749 (24.8%) of those patients were positive, and 74 were KRAS G12C positive. Of the KRAS G12C positive patients, 53/74 (71.6%) reported a targeted KRAS treatment in the 2L or greater setting. Conclusions: In this real-world setting, the testing rates for KRAS are almost 90%, with about 70% of the mutated patients receiving a targeted treatment. However, there is still a proportion of patients who did not receive KRAS testing or targeted treatment in this real-world setting. Appropriate and timely testing and utilization of the targeted treatment is necessary for better patient outcomes. [Table: see text]
Real-world outcomes of osimertinib in Peruvian patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR T790M-positive: A multi-institutional experience.
Authors: Marco Galvez-Nino, Katia Roque, Fernando Namuche, Rossana Ruiz, Victor Paitan Amaro, Roberto Coello, Maria del Pilar Cabrera, Lorenzo Maco, Juan Carlos Ezquerra, Rodolfo Perez Roca, Ofelia Coanqui, Natalia Valdivieso, Mivael Olivera Hurtado de Mendoza, Alfredo Aguilar Cartagena, Luis Mas
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

e20605 Background: Osimertinib is the standard of care for advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M-positive whose disease has progressed to EGFR TKI therapy, however, the knowledge on the real benefit of these therapies in the Latin American setting remains unclear due the lack of access in the most countries. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of Osimertinib as sencond line treatment of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M-positive in a real-world Peruvian setting. Methods: This is a retrospective study of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M-positive treated with osimertinib at seven Peruvian institutions between July 2018 and May 2023. Outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and OS from the start of first-line treatment to death. Results: We analyzed 41 T790M-positive patients with a median age of 60 years (range 36-87y), most of them were females (65.9%), 17.1% had smoking history and 19.5% biomass exposition as a main risk factor. About diagnosis and clinical features, T790M mutation was detected by liquid biopsy in 29.3% of cases, 36 patients (87.8%) had status performance 0 - 1 (ECOG) and 10 (24.4%) presented brain metastases as progression to the previous line of treatment. About outcomes, the ORR was 70.8%; with a median follow-up of 36 months, the median PFS was 15.2 months (95% IC, 9.6 - 20.7) and median OS since the start osimertinib was 16.3 months (95% IC, 7.6 - 24.9), no differences were found regarding the presence of brain metastases (p = 0.06 and p = 0.32) or type of mutation (p = 0.27 and p = 0.46) in both PFS and OS. Median OS from the start of first-line treatment was 46.6 months (95% IC, 34.5 - 58.7). As supplementary analysis, in the same period of time, 11 T790M-positive patients who did not receive osimertinib as second line of treatment achieved a median OS from the start of first-line treatment of 23.5 months (95% IC, 16.5 - 30.5). This OS was significantly lower compared to those who did receive osimertinib (p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study confirms the efficacy of osimertinib in the real world when used as a second line of treatment in T790M-positive patients, in addition the feasibility of osimertinib in this setting may significantly impact the survival.
Safety and efficacy of osimertinib plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in EGFR-mutant NSCLC with brain metastases: A dynamic ctDNA-guided study.
Authors: Fang Wei, Juan An, Yichun Hua, Xiaosheng Ding, Shibin Sun, Xiaoyan Li
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

e20606 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with positive driver genes had a higher incidence of brain metastasis. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of Osimertinib combined with Bevacizumab as first line treatment in EGFR-mutant NSCLC with brain metastases, utilizing liquid biopsy and dynamic molecular detection to guide treatment strategies. This approach is anticipated to bring progression-free survival (PFS) benefits and shows different resistant mechanisms. Methods: We enrolled EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases receiving Osimertinib and Bevacizumab as first-line therapy. Paired plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected at baseline, during stable disease, and at disease progression for Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis. The study's primary endpoints were central nervous system (CNS) PFS and objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included overall PFS, ORR, disease control rate (DCR), and safety. We also investigated resistance mechanisms to the combination therapy. Results: A total of 28 patients from Beijing TianTan Hospital (May 2020 - July 2023) were retrospectively enrolled. The average Bevacizumab treatment duration was 8.21 months (range: 1-27 months). CNS PFS was 26.73 months (95% CI, not reached), and overall PFS was 21.93 months (95% CI, 18.84-25.02 months). The CNS PFS for patients with 19del and L858R mutations were not reached and 26.73 months (95% CI, 15.11-38.35 months), respectively (p = 0.25). Patients undergoing intracranial local treatment showed a CNS PFS not reached, compared to 23.33 months (95% CI, 16.21-30.45 months) for those who did not (p = 0.417). The CNS ORR was 88%, ORR was 76%, and DCR was 100%. At the time of data cutoff (Dec 15th, 2023), 1 patient progressed in both lung and CNS metastases, 8 patients only progressed in lung, 8 patients only progressed in CNS metastases .EGFR C797S mutation was detected in 2 plasma sample, Met amplification in 1 tumor tissue, EGFR C719S mutation in 1 paired plasma-tumor tissue and PIK3CA in 2 plasma sample. Increasing abundance in TP53 and CDKN2A were detected in 2 paired plasma-tumor tissue. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher included one case (3.6%) of severe ulcerative colitis leading to Osimertinib discontinuation and two cases (7.1%) of bevacizumab discontinuation due to bleeding events. Conclusions: Osimertinib combined with Bevacizumab as a first-line treatment significantly prolonged CNS PFS in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases, offering superior control over intracranial lesions compared to Osimertinib monotherapy (15.2 months, FLAURA study). This study underscores the potential of dynamic ctDNA monitoring in guiding effective treatment strategies for this patient population. Further research is warranted to explore the broader clinical implications of these findings.
First-line treatment of EGFR mutation adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung with aumolertinib: A multicenter, single-arm, prospective study (ARISE Study).
Authors: Gen Lin, Long Huang, Qian Chu, Dingzhi Huang, Zhe Liu, Yongfeng Yu
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

e20541 Background: Adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung (ASC), which composed of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, is a rare lung cancer. In Asian population, the mutation rate of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in ASC is approximately 15.4% to 44%. There were no large prospective clinical studies using EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) to treat ASC. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial, designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Aumolertinib for ASC patients with EGFR mutations without prior systemic therapy (originally designed as a randomized controlled study versus chemotherapy; the protocol was revised to single-arm study due to insufficient enrollment; Clinical Trial Registry No. NCT04354961). Eligible participants of stage IIIB/IV ASC with EGFR mutations from six Chinese medical centers received Aumolertinib 110mg orally once daily. Follow-up were performed every 6 weeks conducted by independent central review (ICR), based on the RECIST 1.1 criteria. Primary endpoints was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR) and safety. Results: Of the 18 patients recruited, 12 were evaluated for efficacy and safety. The median follow-up was 13.3 months, with 17 (range 4-26) doses of Aumolertinib treatment. The median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI 5.0-8.2), while the median OS has not been reached. Of the 12 patients, 7 (58.3%) achieved PR, 3 (25.0%) achieved SD, and 2 (16.7%) were PD. The ICR-confirmed ORR and DCR were 58.3% (95% CI: 62.6%-74.6%) and 83.3% (95% CI: 89.6%-96.2%), respectively. A total of 9 patients (75%) experienced at least one treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). the most common TRAEs were anemia (27.3%) and elevated aminotransferase (18.2%). three patients (25%) experienced grade 3-4 TRAEs in the form of paralysis, neutropenia and hypokalemia. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: This is the first prospective clinical study showing that Aumolertinib is an effective and well-tolerated third-generation EGFR TKI for ASC with EGFR mutations, with favorable ORR and general PFS. In future, head-to-head comparisons of EGFR TKI with chemotherapy and combination therapy would be needed to be explored. Clinical trial information: NCT04354961 .
Prognostic factors and long-term survivors in EGFR-mutated lung cancer: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis.
Authors: Feng-Che Kuan, Yao Ren Yang, Wu Yuying, Meng-Hung Lin, Chung-Sheng Shi
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

e20594 Background: Evolution of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) shapes the treatment paradigm of EGFR-mutated lung cancer, but resistance eventually develops. It is important to dissect the prognostic factors and to know the differences between long-term responders (LTR) and non-responders (NR). Methods: Electronic medical records were retrieved from Chang-Gung Medical Foundation from 2011 to 2020. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival, such as progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models was adopted to estimate adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. P &lt; 0.05 was set to be statistical significance. Results: Totally, there are 3,551 patients receiving frontline TKIs, of which 825 (23.2%) are LTR with OS &gt; 36 months, and 1,036 (29.2%) are NR with OS &lt; 12 months. Besides, there are 1,200 (33.8%) LTRs with PFS &gt; 18 months and 882 (24.8%) NR with PFS &lt; 6 months. LTR tend to be younger, female, non-smoker, clinical stage 3b, no baseline brain metastasis, exon 19 deletions subtype, subsequent T790M development, bevacizumab usage, and osimertinib exposure (p all &lt; 0.05). The median PFS of all enrolled patients is 12.3 months and median OS is 22.3 months. By multivariate analysis, age older than 65 years (Hazard ratio, [HR]:1.25 [1.15-1.36]), male (HR: 1.24 [1.13-1.36]), clinical stage 4 (2.19 [1.78-2.69]), baseline brain metastasis (1.25 [1.12-1.37]) are poor prognostic factors (p &lt; 0.05). Also, T790M is not only predictive to osimertinib but also prognostic factor to OS (p &lt; 0.05), and patients who developed subsequent T790M tend to have better PFS (18.1 v.s. 11.8 months). In patients without detected T790M along their disease course, exposure to osimertinib is related to better OS (33.1 v.s. 18.3 month, log-rank p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: LTR and NR are of distinctive characteristics, and T790M is prognostic and predictive to osimertinib. Further study is warranted for choosing the optimal treatment by clinical factors and T790M status.
Cost-efficiency and expanded access modeling of toripalimab versus pembrolizumab in locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.
Authors: Karen MacDonald, Marc Pondel, Ivo Abraham
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

e20590 Background: Toripalimab, a novel anti-PD-1 antibody, demonstrated significant PFS and OS benefit in combination with pemetrexed and platinum (toripalimab+PemPlat) in advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC) over placebo+PemPlat in the CHOICE-01 trial (median PFS: 9.7 vs 5.5 months; median OS: NE vs 17.0 months), though not currently approved for this indication. FDA-approved pembrolizumab+PemPlat was similarly found to extend PFS and OS over placebo+PemPlat in metastatic nsNSCLC patients in KEYNOTE-189 (median PFS: 9.0 vs 4.9 months; median OS: 22.0 vs 10.7 months). The current wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) of pembrolizumab is $11,115 per dose. The WAC of toripalimab, recently approved for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, is 80% of pembrolizumab. In this simulation we modeled the cost-efficiency of the toripalimab regimen versus pembrolizumab in nsNSCLC and the budget-neutral expanded access to additional toripalimab enabled by savings. Methods: Utilizing WAC drug costs and treatment administration costs, we estimated the cost-efficiency of the toripalimab regimen for the median PFS 9.7 months observed in CHOICE-01 versus the pembrolizumab regimen for the median PFS 9.0 months observed in KEYNOTE-189. We assumed that 14 cycles of toripalimab+Pem (with carboplatin in cycles 1-4) are administered over 9.7 months and 13 cycles of pembrolizumab+Pem (with carboplatin in cycles 1-4) are administered over 9.0 months. From the differential, we estimated the potential expanded access to additional toripalimab treatment on a budget-neutral basis. The model was replicated utilizing an ex ante toripalimab average sales price (ASP) of 80% of pembrolizumab ASP. Results: The pembrolizumab regimen costs $176,705 over 9.0 months (13 cycles) while the toripalimab regimen costs $159,136 over 9.7 months (14 cycles) at the respective WACs, for savings of $17,569 per patient. This would enable the purchase of 1.6 additional toripalimab+pemetrexed maintenance cycles on a budget-neutral basis for every patient treated. For every 9 patients treated with toripalimab instead of pembrolizumab, one additional patient could be treated with the full toripalimab regimen (all agents) for 9.7 months. Extrapolated to the US incident nsNSCLC population of 49,647 patients, if only 5% of patients are treated with toripalimab instead of pembrolizumab estimated savings of $43,611,849 provide access to 3,849 additional toripalimab+pemetrexed maintenance cycles or 274 full toripalimab regimens (all agents for 9.7 months) budget-neutrally. Similar results were seen in the ex ante ASP model. Conclusions: If approved for use in advanced nsNSCLC, toripalimab is estimated, at its market-entry WAC, to save $17.6 thousand per patient over a median PFS 9.7 months treatment duration compared to the pembrolizumab regimen over a median PFS 9.0 months of treatment.
Genomic profiling of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma in Indian patients: Implications for precision oncology.
Authors: Kumar Prabhash, Prashant Kumar, Prerana Jha, Asim Joshi, Rohit Mishra, Sewanti Limaye, Govind Babu Kanakasetty, Ullas Batra, Prabhat Singh Malik, Nandini Sharrel Menon, Minit Jalan Shah, Vijay Maruti Patil, Amit Rauthan, Moni Kuriakose, Vanita Noronha, R Venkataramanan
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

e20599 Background: Lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer related mortalities, remains a significant global health burden. Despite advances in next generation sequencing technologies, the genomic landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Indian patients remains underexplored. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the genomic landscape of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma among Indian patients using targeted sequencing data of over 400 lung cancer patients. Methods: Utilizing targeted sequencing of 50 established cancer-related genes, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the genomic alteration profiles in 325 lung adenocarcinoma and 81 lung squamous carcinoma samples from Indian patients. Further, we employed robust statistical methodologies to delineate correlations between genomic alterations and clinical characteristics including age, gender, extent of disease, habits and PD-L1 status. Furthermore, our investigation revealed distinctive genomic signatures of NSCLC specific to the Indian population through comparative analyses across various ethnicities. Results: EGFR mutations were detected in 45.8% of lung adenocarcinoma and a notable 18% of lung squamous carcinoma cases among Indian patients, showing significant prevalence among females and non-smokers. Alongside EGFR, lung adenocarcinoma patients exhibited frequent alterations in TP53 (27.4%), ALK (11.4%), and KRAS (10.2%), while lung squamous carcinoma cases predominantly showed mutations in TP53 (40.7%), PIK3CA (17.3%), and CDKN2A (8.6%). Remarkably, 68% of lung adenocarcinoma cases deemed eligible for NCCN-approved targeted therapies. Additionally, it was observed that 60% of PD-L1-negative squamous carcinoma patients harbored TP53 alterations, indicating intriguing therapeutic implications. Overall, we observed alterations in 88% lung adenocarcinoma and 70% lung squamous carcinoma patients. Conclusions: Our study unveiled distinct genomic variations present in both adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma patients from India, revealing crucial insights for precision medicine and clinical management of lung cancer. Our findings provide a significant lead for designing clinical trials aimed at evaluating EGFR inhibitors in lung squamous carcinoma patients, potentially expanding therapeutic options for Indian lung cancer patients.
Impact of concomitant H1 antihistamine administered during initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy on survival outcome and safety in patients with advanced primary lung cancer.
Authors: Weihong Zhang, Bingxue Li, Liang Liu, Xiubao Ren
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

e20532 Background: Antihistamines alleviate the side effects of antitumor drugs and have some antitumor effects. However, they have rarely been tested in combination with other antitumor therapies, especially immunotherapy. Methods: We compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced primary lung cancer (stage III or IV) receiving immunotherapy with H1 antihistamine diphenhydramine alone (n = 40) or in combination with H2 antihistamine cimetidine (n = 69) [experimental group] to those receiving immunotherapy alone (n = 75) or with a H2 antihistamine cimetidine (n = 27) [control group]. We used the inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) to balance the two groups. Kaplan Meier curves were used to compare OS and PFS between the two groups. Cox regression analyses were used to describe the association between patient characteristics and OS or PFS. Results: The experimental group comprised 109 patients, while the control group comprised 102. The median PFS (mPFS) was 12.7 months in the experimental group and 4.3 months in the control group (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.63, P &lt; 0.001). The median OS (mOS) was 32.8 months in the experimental group and 18.1 months in the control group (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.91, P = 0.038). In the experimental group, patients treated with only H1 antihistamine had longer mPFS and mOS as compared with those who received H1 plus H2 antihistamines (mPFS: 18.0 months vs. 6.8 months, HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.63, P &lt; 0.001; mOS: not reached vs. 26.6 months, HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.94, P = 0.030). In the control group, patients who received no antihistamine had longer mPFS and mOS compared to those who received only H2 antihistamines (mPFS: 5.8 months vs. 4.1 months, HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.67, P &lt; 0.001; mOS: 25.5 vs. 16.9 months, HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1.00, P = 0.049). After multivariate analyses, H1 antihistamine was the independent good prognostic factor for PFS and OS (PFS: HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31-0.65, P &lt; 0.001; OS: HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99, P = 0.047). Conversely, H2 antihistamine was the independent poor prognostic factor for PFS and OS (PFS: HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.67-3.57, P &lt; 0.001; OS: HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.49-3.70, P &lt; 0.001). After IPTW, the rate of any grade of irAEs in the experimental group was 52.4%, while that of the control group was 69.2% ( P = 0.015), including 4.5% for irAEs grades ≥3 in the experimental group and 25.9% for irAEs grades ≥3 in the control group ( P = 0.003). Conclusions: Concomitant H1 antihistamines can not only improve immunotherapy efficacy but also reduce irAEs. Concomitant use of H2 antihistamines may shorten PFS and OS time.