Abstract A032: Preliminary evaluation of sleep-related patient-reported outcomes (pros), morningness-eveningness chronotype, &amp; objective sleep measures using smart wearables in a primary brain tumor patient population
Authors: Maeve M. Pascoe, Elizabeth Vera, Hope Miller, Alex Wollet, Dorela Shuboni-Mulligan, Amanda L. King, Terri S. Armstrong
Journal: Cancer Research (2024)

Abstract Introduction: Sleep is vitally important for the improvement of cancer outcomes, but evaluation of sleep in the primary brain tumor (PBT) population is limited. This analysis aims to provide preliminary data on the consistency/reliability of sleep-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and to assess sleep symptom severity with both PROs and objective sleep measurements. Methods: PBT patients ³ 18 years wore a Fitbit smart-wearable device for 4 weeks, which captured objective sleep measures (total sleep time, sleep latency, nap odds/number/duration, and wake after sleep onset (WASO)). The Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) was completed at baseline, PROMIS Sleep-Related Impairment (SRI) and Sleep Disturbance (SD) Short-Forms were completed at baseline and at the end of the study, and daily sleep diaries were done during the final week. Descriptive statistics were used to describe patient demographics/clinical characteristics, Cronbach’s alpha to test consistency, McNemar’s tests for change in PRO severity, and Pearson’s correlations for relationships between PROs and objective sleep measures at week 1 and week 4. Results: 54 patients (median 46 years (24-71), 56% male, 85% white non-Hispanic, 81% KPS ≥ 90) completed the study. Most had anaplastic astrocytoma (20%) or glioblastoma (17%), had received radiation therapy (83%), had prior tumor recurrence (32%), and were not on active treatment (80%) during the study. PROMIS SRI/SD and MEQ were all consistent and reliable (Cronbach’s alpha 0.74-0.92). Fifty-six percent of patients had an intermediate sleep chronotype, 35% moderate-morning, 4% definite-morning, and only 6% moderate-evening (0% definite-evening). Moderate-severe SD and SRI were reported in 13% and 17% at baseline, and 4% (p=0.06) and 13% (p=0.69) at study exit. Co-occurrence of SD and SRI decreased from 11% to 2% (p=0.06). Fitbit-recorded measures showed a correlation at week 4 between WASO and SD (r=0.35, p=0.009), and a trend with SRI (r=0.24, p=0.08). Conclusions: This investigation shows initial evidence that sleep-related PROs are consistent and reliable in PBT patients, &amp;gt;10% of participants had significant SD and SRI, and the majority had intermediate and morningness chronotypes. Surprisingly, significant improvement in SD was reported during the study, which may be related to increased awareness of sleep patterns by the participants. Lack of sleep improvement (high SD/SRI) was associated with increased WASO, suggesting greater sleep fragmentation and potentially greater circadian vs. homeostatic sleep drive dysregulation in this population, warranting further investigation. Citation Format: Maeve M. Pascoe, Elizabeth Vera, Hope Miller, Alex Wollet, Dorela Shuboni-Mulligan, Amanda L. King, Terri S. Armstrong. Preliminary evaluation of sleep-related patient-reported outcomes (pros), morningness-eveningness chronotype, &amp; objective sleep measures using smart wearables in a primary brain tumor patient population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Brain Cancer; 2023 Oct 19-22; Minneapolis, Minnesota. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(5 Suppl_1):Abstract nr A032.