tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Breaking boundaries: Exploring extended pembrolizumab in first-line treatment of renal cell carcinoma with axitinib-pembrolizumab combination.
Authors: Can Aydogdu, Pia Paffenholz, Ramona Stelmach, Katrin Schlack, Florian Roghmann, Analena Handke, Subhajit Mandal, Marco Schnabel, Axel Merseburger, Philipp Ivanyi, Stefanie Zschaebitz, Christopher Darr, Viktor Grünwald, Christian G. Stief, Jozefina Casuscelli
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

436 Background: The standard first-line treatment for metastatic renal cancer (mRCC) combines immune checkpoint- (ICI) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). While TKI therapy continues until disease progression, ICI treatment is typically stopped after 24 months or 35 cycles, aligning with approval study criteria. However, in real-world practice, the decision to discontinue ICI therapy upon achieving a positive response can be distressing for both patients and healthcare providers; thus ICIs are not stopped. We conducted an initial analysis of prolonged pembrolizumab (Pem) use in axitinib-pembrolizumab (Axi-Pem) combination therapy to evaluate its effects and toxicity. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from mRCC patients treated with first-line Axi-Pem in 10 German tertiary care centers between 2019 and 2023. After completing 35 cycles or 24 months of Pem, patients were offered continued ICI therapy if positive response was assessed. We calculated objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the treatment start to achievement of 36 therapy months. Adverse events (irAEs) were reported following CTCAE 5.0 criteria. Results: Out of 72 patients, 27 met strict eligibility criteria from the Keynote-426 study (NCT02853331), with a response at 24 months and continuous Pem therapy. Patients had a median age of 65.7 years (range: 34-84), and IMDC risk was favorable/intermediate/poor in 22.2%/55.5%/18.5%. Median follow-up was 33.2 months (range: 25.3-48.4). At the 36-mos landmark, median PFS was not reached (PFS 64.7%), ORR was 63.6%, with complete response, partial response, and stable disease observed in 9.1%(1)/54.5%(6)/9.1%(1) of cases, respectively. Permanent Pem discontinuation occurred due to progressive disease in two cases and complete response in one case. Another case led to Pem discontinuation due to immune-related toxicity. Conclusions: In our selected real-world patient cohort seeking prolonged ICI therapy, responders who received continuous Pem beyond 24 months achieve sustained efficacy in first-line treatment. Furthermore, the incidence of irAEs does not increase with prolonged exposure to ICI therapy. Additional results beyond the 36-month landmark are urgently needed to further support the clinical necessity and feasibility of ongoing ICI treatment in light of its impact on the overall financial burden of cancer care.
Avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC): Long-term outcomes from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial in patients (pts) with high body mass index (BMI).
Authors: Jeanny B. Aragon-Ching, Daniel P. Petrylak, Srikala S. Sridhar, Shilpa Gupta, Petros Grivas, Thomas Powles, Howard Gurney, Natalia Jacob, Karin Tyroller, Silke Guenther, Joaquim Bellmunt
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

600 Background: Avelumab 1L maintenance is recommended as standard of care by international treatment guidelines for pts with aUC that has not progressed with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy, based on level 1 evidence from the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (NCT02603432). In the trial, avelumab 1L maintenance + best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) vs BSC alone (median OS, 23.8 vs 15.0 mo; HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.63-0.91]; 2-sided p=0.0036). The long-term safety of avelumab 1L maintenance was also demonstrated. It is estimated that 25% of the world’s population will have BMI ≥30 by 2035, and high BMI is a risk factor for bladder cancer. We report post hoc analyses of long-term outcomes from JAVELIN Bladder 100 in pts with high BMI (≥30) at baseline. Methods: Eligible pts with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC without progression after 4-6 cycles of 1L platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 wk + BSC (n=350) or BSC alone (n=350). The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included PFS and safety. Results: At data cutoff (June 4, 2021), median follow-up was ≥38 mo in both arms. In the avelumab + BSC and BSC alone arms, 67 and 55 pts had high BMI at baseline, respectively. In these pts, median OS was 20.8 mo (95% CI, 16.9-34.4) with avelumab + BSC vs 12.7 mo (95% CI, 8.1-26.6) with BSC alone (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.49-1.21]); 2-y OS rates were 47.8% vs 37.6%, respectively. Median PFS by investigator was 5.6 mo (95% CI, 3.7-7.5) with avelumab + BSC vs 2.1 mo (95% CI, 1.9-4.0) with BSC alone (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.97]); 2-y PFS rates were 23.5% vs 11.3%, respectively. Long-term safety in pts with high BMI was generally consistent with the overall safety population (Table). Conclusions: This exploratory analysis shows the long-term efficacy and tolerability of avelumab 1L maintenance in pts with high BMI in JAVELIN Bladder 100, with no new safety concerns identified. These results further support the use of avelumab 1L maintenance as standard of care in pts with aUC who are progression free after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy, including pts with high BMI. Clinical trial information: NCT02603432 . [Table: see text]
Subgroup analyses from READY: Real-world data from an Italian compassionate use program (CUP) of avelumab first-line maintenance (1LM) treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC).
Authors: Sergio Bracarda, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Marco Maruzzo, Daniele Santini, Rosa Tambaro, Sebastiano Buti, Francesco Carrozza, Fabio Calabrò, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe Fornarini, Roberto Iacovelli, Daniela Cullurà, Carlo Messina, Linda Cerbone, Gennaro Fazzi, Filippo Venturini, Raffaele Colasanto, Andrea Necchi, Ugo De Giorgi
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

558 Background: A multicenter CUP provided early access to avelumab 1LM in Italian patients (pts) with Ia/mUC before reimbursement. Real-world pt characteristics and outcomes with avelumab 1LM from READY were reported previously. Here, we report updated data and subgroup analyses of effectiveness with avelumab 1LM. Methods: This prospective, noninterventional CUP included pts with la/mUC who were progression free after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC; 4-6 cycles, starting avelumab 1LM 4-10 wk after last PBC dose). Pts were enrolled from Jan 18, 2021 to Mar 7, 2022. Avelumab was provided per physician request and after approval by local ethics committees, per Italian compassionate-use regulations. Pts who had a relapse within 12 mo of prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant systemic therapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, were excluded. Results: 464 pts were included (78.45/21.55% male/female; median age, 70.0 y [interquartile range, 63.0-76.0]). At data cutoff (July 30, 2023), median follow-up from start of avelumab 1LM in 411 evaluable pts was 20.24 mo (95% CI, 19.78-20.93); median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from start of avelumab were 26.22 mo (95% CI, 19.97-not estimable [NE]) and 7.63 mo (95% CI, 5.79-9.24), respectively. In pts aged &lt;60 y (n=53), 60-70 y (n=150), and &gt;70 y (n=208), median OS (95% CI) was not reached (NR; 12.86 mo-NE), NR (24.21 mo-NE), and 24.01 mo (16.94-NE), and median PFS was 5.20 mo (2.83-6.71), 7.70 mo (5.26-10.07), and 8.82 mo (6.05-12.93), respectively. In pts who received 1L cisplatin + gemcitabine (n=183) and 1L carboplatin + gemcitabine (n=219), median OS (95% CI) was NR (16.05 mo-NE) and 25.10 mo (19.97-NE), and median PFS was 6.61 mo (5.30-9.18) and 8.42 mo (6.05-12.73), respectively. The table shows OS and PFS in other subgroups defined by best response to 1L PBC and number of 1L PBC cycles received. Conclusions: Real-world outcomes with avelumab 1LM in this CUP in Italy show clinical benefit across various subgroups. These data are clinically relevant and are consistent with other real-world country-based studies and the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial. Findings further support the use of avelumab 1LM as standard of care in pts with la/mUC who are progression free after PBC. [Table: see text]
P3BEP (ANZUP 1302): An international randomized phase 3 trial of accelerated versus standard BEP chemotherapy for individuals aged 11-45 years with intermediate and poor-risk metastatic germ cell tumours (GCTs).
Authors: Blossom Mak, Ben Tran, Farzana D. Pashankar, Danish Mazhar, Robert A Huddart, Matthew Wheater, Euan Thomas Walpole, Darren R. Feldman, Elaine Dunwoodie, Nicola Jane Lawrence, Alison Jane Birtle, David Wyld, Amanda Gwendolyn Stevanovic, Jay Michael S. Balagtas, Martin R. Stockler, Ian D. Davis
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

TPS524 Background: Bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) given 3-weekly x 4 remains standard first-line chemotherapy for intermediate and poor-risk metastatic GCT. Accelerating standard chemotherapy regimens by shortening the cycle length to 2-weekly improved cure rates in other cancers. P3BEP is the first international, randomized trial of chemotherapy for intermediate and poor-risk metastatic GCT to include adults and children of both sexes. It aims to determine the superiority of accelerated BEP versus standard BEP in this setting. Methods: This open label, randomized, phase 3 trial is conducted seamlessly in 2 stages. The primary endpoint for stage 1 (n = 150) was favourable response; and for stage 2 (n = 500) is progression free survival at 2 years (PFS2y). These sample sizes provide &gt; 80% power with a two-sided type I error rate of 5% to detect an absolute improvement of 21% in the favourable response rate (stage 1) and of 7% in the PFS2y (stage 2). The target population is males and females aged 11 to 45 with intermediate or poor-risk metastatic GCT of the testis, ovary, retroperitoneum, or mediastinum. Participants are randomized (1:1) to 4 cycles of standard BEP (q3w) or accelerated BEP (q2w) with cisplatin 20mg/m 2 D1-5, etoposide 100mg/m 2 D1-5, bleomycin 30 KIU weekly x 12, and pegylated G-CSF 6mg D6 or filgrastim daily. Study assessments occur at 30 days after completing chemotherapy, 6 months from randomization, and after completion of all post-chemotherapy treatments (e.g. surgery). Tumour tissue and baseline blood samples are collected for translational substudies. As of 24 August 2023, 274 participants have been recruited from 23 ANZ sites, 17 UK sites (led by Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit), and 150 USA sites (led by Children’s Oncology Group). The first planned interim analysis for safety (n = 76) identified no safety concerns. The stage 1 analysis of safety and activity (response rate) for the 1st 150 patients was reviewed by the IDSMC, which recommended continuation of the trial as per protocol. Clinical trial information: NCT02582697 .
Clinical outcomes with systemic therapy given after progression on prostate specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Authors: Soumaya Labidi, Aida Salehi, Parvaneh Fallah, Vincent G. Morin, Meredith Li, Stephan Probst, Cristiano Ferrario, April A. N. Rose
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

78 Background: PSMA-RLT is a novel therapeutic modality that improves overall survival in mCRPC. However, outcomes for systemic therapy given after progression on PSMA-RLT are not well described. We investigated treatment choices and outcomes in patients (pts) with mCRPC who experienced disease progression after PSMA-RLT. Methods: We performed a single center retrospective cohort study of pts with mCRPC, who received PSMA-RLT at the Jewish General Hospital between 2020 and 2023. Clinical characteristics, PSA50, further lines of therapy post PSMA-RLT and survival were abstracted from chart review. A log-rank test was used to assess overall survival (OS). Post-PSMA-RLT specific OS (Post-RLT-OS) was defined from the date of first systemic treatment after PSMA-RLT failure to death or last follow up. Results: We identified 42 pts who received PSMA-RLT for mCRPC. The median age was 63 years (47-89) and the majority (56.1%) of pts received PSMA-RLT as a 3 rd or later line of therapy in mCRPC setting. Amongst these pts, 15/42 (35.7%) achieved a PSA50 response to PSMA-RLT; 36 pts experienced disease progression, and 25/36 with disease progression (69.4%) received subsequent active systemic therapy. Post-PSMA-RLT systemic therapy included chemotherapy (n=17), PARP inhibitors (PARPi) (n=3), bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) followed by androgen receptor-axis targeted agent (ARAT) (BAT+ARAT) (n=2), Radium (n=2), BAT (n=1), and different PSMA-RLT agent (n=1). Amongst the pts who received post-PSMA-RLT therapy, 5/25 (20%) achieved a PSA50 response. PSA50 responses were observed in pts who received chemotherapy (n=2), BAT+ARAT (n=2) and PARPi (n=1). After a median follow-up of 10 months, the median Post-RLT-OS in the entire cohort was 11.7 months. Post-RLT-OS was significantly associated with PSA levels at the time of post-PSMA-RLT systemic therapy. The median Post-RLT-OS for pts with PSA &lt; 100 (n=11), 100 ≤ PSA &lt; 1000 (n=5) PSA ≥ 1000 (n=5) was 15, 15.7, and 8.6 months respectively (P = 0.014). Conclusions: Some pts derive benefit from post-PSMA-RLT systemic therapy; however, the overall response rate is low and therapeutic options are limited. More research is needed to define mechanisms of resistance to PSMA-RLT, and to identify novel therapeutic opportunities in this patient population.
Outcomes for patients with mCRPC and liver metastasis receiving 177-Lu-PSMA-617 treatment.
Authors: Miguel Muniz, A. Oliver Sartor, Ahmed M. Mahmoud, Jacob Orme, John Y. Kwon, Jack R. Andrews, Adam McLain Kase, Osama M Mosalem, Alan Haruo Bryce, Irbaz Bin Riaz, Matthew Thorpe, Ayse T. Kendi, Geoffrey Johnson, Praful Ravi, Eugene D. Kwon, Daniel S Childs
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

175 Background: It is well-known that patients with liver metastases from metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have poorer or transient responses to many forms of systemic therapy. Data on outcomes following treatment with Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 is scarce. The VISION trial reports hazard ratios for overall survival in the subgroup of patients with liver metastases without disclosing the absolute duration of survival. Using real-world clinical data, we examine this important subgroup of patients, describing their PSA response rates and survival. Methods: A single institution database was assembled to include all patients receiving 177-Lu-PSMA-617 at Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, and starting treatment in the interval of March 2022 to March 2023. Baseline clinicopathologic and imaging characteristics were abstracted. Patients were categorized based on the presence or absence of measurable liver metastases on their baseline PSMA PET scan. Best PSA response while on treatment was annotated and reported as percent decline from baseline. Survival was calculated from date of first cycle of 177-Lu-PSMA-617. PSA50 response and overall survival (OS) outcomes for the two groups (liver metastases versus no liver metastases) were compared using Chi square test and Kaplan-Meier method, respectively. Those with available pre-treatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genomic profiling, performed by Guardant (83 gene panel), were assessed for the presence of pathogenic and likely pathogenic alterations. Findings are summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: The overall cohort consisted of 212 patients, including 29 (14%) with liver metastases on pre-treatment PSMA PET/CT. The median number of cycles received was 4 (range, 1-6) for patients with liver metastases and 6 (range, 1-6) for those without hepatic involvement. The observed PSA50 response trended lower for those with liver metastases (34.5% [10/29] versus 51% [94/183], p= 0.091). At median (IQR) follow-up of 10 (8-12) months, there was a numerical but not statistically significant difference in median OS (11.28 months versus NR, p=0.066). In the exploratory analysis of baseline ctDNA, BRCA2 copy number loss was relatively enriched among patients with liver metastases (4 of 19, 21%) versus patients without liver disease (5.7%, 9/158). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the presence of liver metastases predict poorer outcomes in patients receiving Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 treatment, which is similar to data reported with other forms of systemic therapy for mCRPC. To maximize the anti-tumor activity of radioligand therapy in the liver, combination approaches should be explored.
Contemporary management and pathologic outcomes of men with low- and very low-risk prostate cancer.
Authors: Austin Y. Ho, Eric Li, Richard Bennett, Jonathan Aguiar, Sai Kumar, Clayton Neill, Edward M. Schaeffer, Hiten Dilip Patel, Ashley Ross
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

297 Background: The very-low risk (VLR) substratification of prostate cancer has been called into question with the 2022 American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines dropping this designation. Historical data suggested men with VLR disease have a reduced risk of disease progression compared to other low risk (LR) men. In this study, we evaluate contemporary initial management, disease progression, and predictors of upgrading for VLR and LR patients in a multi-centered hospital system. Methods: We retrospectively identified men diagnosed with VLR or LR prostate cancer across our eleven-hospital system (January 2018-September 2022). Active surveillance (AS) was defined as no treatment within 1 year of diagnosis. Adverse pathology at surgery was defined as Gleason Grade (GG) 3-5 or pT3b. Clinical variables were compared with appropriate statistical tests (Wilcoxon rank sum, Chi square, Fisher’s exact). A multivariable logistic regression model evaluated predictors of upgrading (≥GG2). Results: 566 patients (305 VLR, 261 LR) were included. AS was the initial management for 85% and 78% of VLR and LR patients, respectively (p=0.029). With a median follow up time of 26 months, VLR patients were less likely receive treatment versus LR patients (24% vs. 38%, p&lt;0.001) or be reclassified to GG2-5 disease (24% vs. 39%, p&lt;0.001). VLR patients had less volume of disease at diagnosis by percentage of positive cores (7% vs. 16%, p&lt;0.001) and maximum core positivity (7% vs. 20%, p&lt;0.001). On multivariable regression analysis, only pre-biopsy PI-RADS (OR 1.88 for PI-RADS 4 (p=0.030); OR 4.53 for PI-RADS 5 (p&lt;0.001)) and percentage of positive cores (OR 1.02, p=0.039) were significant predictors of upgrading. Of men who receiving surgery, adverse pathology rates were similar for VLR and LR patients (14% vs. 19%, p=0.5). Conclusions: Men with VLR prostate cancer have lower treatment and upgrading rates than LR patients. VLR patients were more likely to be initially managed with AS and forgo definitive treatment, but rates of adverse pathology at surgery were similar. The findings support the AUA decision to drop the VLR substratification, but attention to high MRI PI-RADS and percentage of positive cores at diagnosis should be considered when evaluating risk of disease progression for men with GG1 prostate cancer.[Table: see text]
Comparative survival in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) by prognostic subgroups: A living network meta-analysis.
Authors: Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi, Irbaz Bin Riaz, Kaneez Zahra Rubab Khakwani, Arifa Bibi, Jack R. Andrews, Daniel S Childs, Praful Ravi, Jacob Orme, Parminder Singh, Christopher Sweeney, Alan Haruo Bryce
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

171 Background: Treatment effects vary by volume of disease and timing of metastatic presentation in patients with mCSPC. Therefore, we updated the existing body of evidence to assess the comparative efficacy of systemic therapy in mCSPC by prognostic subgroups to inform clinical practice guidelines. Methods: This living systematic review was conducted using the living interactive evidence (LIvE) synthesis framework. Phase III clinical trials assessing contemporary systemic therapy in mCSPC and reporting overall survival (OS) by four prognostic subgroups were included. Prognostic subgroups included synchronous high volume (SHV), synchronous low volume (SLV), metachronous high volume (MHV), and metachronous low volume (MLV) disease. Mixed treatment comparisons were made using a network-meta-analytic approach in each subgroup. P-scores were used to assess relative treatment rankings in congruency with pairwise estimates. Higher scores indicated better efficacy. Results: This study included a total of nine trials with eight unique treatment options. In patients with SHV disease, darolutamide+docetaxel+ADT (DARO+D+ADT) significantly improved OS when compared to D+ADT (HR: 0.69; 0.57-0.85), enzalutamide (E)+ADT (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.46-0.99), and apalutamide (APA)+ADT (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43-0.96). In patients with SLV disease, E+ADT (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.91) and AAP+ADT (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.49-0.89) significantly improved OS when compared to ADT. Although E+D+ADT trended toward improvement compared to other treatments, the results were not statistically significant. In patients withMHV disease, no statistically significant differences were observed among mixed treatment comparisons. However, OS with DARO+D+ADT trended toward improvement when compared to D+ADT (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.39-1.23), APA+ADT (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.23-2.33), E+ADT (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.24-1.86), and E+D+ADT (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.26-1.34). In patients with MLV disease, E+ADT significantly improved OS compared to ADT (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.32-0.79), and D+ADT (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.27-0.85). APA+ADT significant improved OS compared to ADT (HR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.09-0.54), and D+ADT (HR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.08-0.55). No other statistically significant differences were observed among mixed treatment comparisons. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that triplet systemic therapy may be preferred in SHV, E systemic triplet and E hormonal doublet in SLV, DARO systemic triplet and APA hormonal doublet in MHV, and APA or E hormonal doublets in MLV mCSPC. [Table: see text]