Abstract PO4-04-10: Selection criteria for second-line treatments after Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors failure in Hormone Receptor positive metastatic breast cancer patients: the preliminary experience of the HERMIONE-13 trial
Authors: Marina Elena Cazzaniga, Emanuela Rossi, Antonella Turla, Massimo Ambroggi, Alice Baggi, Rossana Berardi, Fulvio Borella, Serena Capici, Federica Cicchiello, Luigi Coltelli, Ugo De Giorgi, Antonella Ferro, Ornella Garrone, Monica Giordano, Elisabetta Landucci, Marco Mazzotta, Gabriella Moretti, Raffaella Palumbo, Francesca Fulvia Pepe, Patrizia Vici, Fable Zustovich, Viola Cogliati
Journal: Cancer Research (2024)

Abstract BACKGROUND: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) represent the standard of care for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC); no consensus actually exists for second-line (2L) treatments. The HERMIONE-13 trial evaluates the adopted therapeutic options after CDK4/6i failure and the potential factors that influence these choices. METHODS: HERMIONE-13 is a retrospective and prospective multicentric observational trial involving 15 Italian Centers. Information about therapies after disease progression to CDK4/6i from January 2016 until December 2020 was collected for the present analysis, aiming at evaluating which are the clinical criteria guiding the choice of 2L therapy after CDK4/6i failure. RESULTS: 114 pts have been enrolled: 14 pts (12.3%) received neoadjuvant treatment, 80 (70.2%) adjuvant therapy, of whom 46 (57.5%) chemotherapy (CT)+ endocrine therapy (ET) and 33 (41.3%) ET alone. Among the 79 pts treated with adjuvant ET, 44 pts (55.7%) showed primary or secondary endocrine resistance. 39 pts (34.2%) received first-line (1L) CDK 4/6i in combination with Fulvestrant (F), the remaining with aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Median duration of 1L CDK4-6i was 10.4 months (interquartile range (IQR) 4.7-17.4). Median age at 2L start was 59.5 years (IQR 51-68). As 2L therapy, 79 pts (69.3%) received CT±targeted therapy (TT) and 35 (30.7%) ET±TT. Visceral metastases at the beginning of 2L were documented in 46 pts (40.4%). Comorbidities were present in 48 (42.9%) of the pts, mainly cardiac diseases (25, 22.3%); 71 pts (63.4%) showed a 1L-related adverse events (AEs) (NA: 2 pts), mainly hematological toxicity (60, 53.6%). Among 79 pts treated with adjuvant ET, 60 (76%) were addressed to 2L CT±TT, while 19 (24%) to an ET-based therapy. A longer duration of 1L was observed in pts treated with 2L ET±TT (12.5 months, 7.2-22.2) in comparison with those treated with CT±TT (8.7 months, 4.2-14.9). The majority of pts treated with 1L F+CDK 4/6i underwent 2L CT-based treatment, as summarized in Table 1. Analyzing the population treated with 2L CT±TT, we observed that median age was 58 years (49-67), slightly lower than that of pts treated with ET±TT (63, 54-69). Among pts with visceral metastases, 30 pts (65.2%) were addressed to 2L CT±TT and 16 pts (34.8%) to ET±TT; CT±TT was also the favorite choice for the majority of pts with concomitant disease (33, 68.8%) and with previous CDK4/6i-related toxicity (47, 66.2%). Among age, visceral metastases, comorbidities, adjuvant treatment, duration of 1L therapy, use of 1L F and 1L related AEs, univariate analysis revealed that previous use of adjuvant ET (p=0.021), 1L F (p&amp;lt; 0.001), duration of 1L treatment (p=0.043) and age at 2L start (p=0.053) are all factors influencing the choice of 2L therapy. At the multivariate logistic regression model, only the use of F in association with CDK4/6i as 1L treatment and age at 2L therapy were associated with the choice between ET±TT vs CT± TT, with a backward selection, as summarized in table 2. CONCLUSION: The preliminary results of our study suggest that previous F in combination with CDK4/6i is a statistically confirmed predictor of choice for subsequent CT, whereas the increase in age is significantly associated with the choice for ET. Further research is needed to investigate the optimal sequencing of treatments following CDK4/6i and to determine predictive factors of response to 2L therapies. Table 1 2L choices in 1L F+CDK 4/6i pts. Table 2 Statistical model with the significant variables. Citation Format: Marina Elena Cazzaniga, Emanuela Rossi, Antonella Turla, Massimo Ambroggi, Alice Baggi, Rossana Berardi, Fulvio Borella, Serena Capici, Federica Cicchiello, Luigi Coltelli, Ugo De Giorgi, Antonella Ferro, Ornella Garrone, Monica Giordano, Elisabetta Landucci, Marco Mazzotta, Gabriella Moretti, Raffaella Palumbo, Francesca Fulvia Pepe, Patrizia Vici, Fable Zustovich, Viola Cogliati. Selection criteria for second-line treatments after Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors failure in Hormone Receptor positive metastatic breast cancer patients: the preliminary experience of the HERMIONE-13 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-04-10.