A prospective study to evaluate the prevelance of chemobrain (CB) in patients (pts) receiving adjuvant treatment.
Authors: Vasiliki Leontopoulou, Evangelia Chantzara, George Christodoulopoulos, Chrysovalantis Aidarinis, Alexandros Lazarou, Maistros Linaras, Konstantinos Skampardonis, Ioannis Samaras, Athanasios Kotsakis, Filippos Koinis
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2024)

e23174 Background: Although adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) significantly improves the clinical outcome of pts with early-stage (ES) cancer, it is also known to cause side-effects. CT-induced cognitive impairment or CB refers to a clinical condition characterized by lack of mental sharpness, memory and concentration impairment and difficulty in processing information and executing simple tasks. Prospective data regarding the emergence of CB are limited. We aimed to explore the prevalence and predictors for CB among pts receiving adjuvant CT and to evaluate its impact on their quality of life (QoL). Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted at the University Hospital of Larissa. Pts who were recently diagnosed with ES breast (BC) or colorectal (CRC) cancer and were about to receive adjuvant CT containing doxorubicin (D) or oxaliplatin (O), respectively, were eligible for this study (C1). The first control group (C2) consisted of ES cancer pts that were not eligible for adjuvant CT and the second group (C3) was recruited from a pool of healthy controls (HCs). All participants (pcs) met the following inclusion criteria: age &gt; 50 years old, ability to speak and write in Greek. Pts with pre-existing dementia/anxiety disorder and severe anemia were excluded from the study. Pts in C1 were assessed before receiving CT and 3 months after CT initiation. All subjects in C2 and C3 were assessed in 3 months intervals as well. After completion of the informed consent process, all pts and age-matched noncancer controls completed the Greek Version of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) to specifically assess CB. QoL was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30. Results: Overall, 82 pts (53 with BC and 29 with CRC) were included in C1, 36 pts (24 with BC and 12 with CRC) in C2 and 15 pcs in C3. At baseline, pts in C1 and C2 had significantly lower FACT-Cog scores than healthy controls in C3 (p: 0.028 and p:0.038, respectively), indicating a higher prevalence of self-reported cognitive impairment among pts with cancer after a curative surgery compared to age-matched HCs. However, after 3 months of CT the majority of pts in C1 (59/82, 72%) demonstrated a decline in their cognitive performance (35/53, 66% in BC pts receiving D and 24/29, 82% in CRC pts receiving O). Pts with CRC receiving O experienced more severe cognitive deficits. On the contrary, 55% of the pts in C2 (20/36, 16 with BC and 4 with CRC) demonstrated an improvement. The presence of CB (decline in cognitive functioning in the absence of severe anemia) was associated with decreased QoL (p = 0.004). Pts were mostly frustrated by the difficulty in executing simple tasks. Conclusions: As demonstrated in one of the largest cohorts of pts with ES cancer, CB is a common problem among pts receiving adjuvant CT and is associated with detrimental impact on daily life. Creating awareness is crucial to offer cancer survivors the best care directed at improving QoL.