Phase I/II investigator-initiated study of olaparib and temozolomide in SCLC: Updated analysis and CNS outcomes.
Authors: Catherine Belle Meador, Subba Digumarthy, Beow Y. Yeap, Anna F. Farago, Rebecca Suk Heist, J Paul Marcoux, Deepa Rangachari, David Allen Barbie, Zofia Piotrowska
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2022)

8565 Background: Temozolomide has activity in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), including patients (pts) with brain metastases (mets; Pietanza M, Clin Cancer Res 2012). Inhibition of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is another therapeutic strategy in SCLC. We hypothesized that olaparib plus temozolomide may be safe and effective for pts with relapsed SCLC and clinically active against CNS disease (Farago A, Cancer Discovery 2019). Here, we present an updated analysis of this combination in pts with relapsed SCLC, including a second cohort testing an alternative dosing strategy and an exploratory analysis of CNS-specific outcomes. Methods: In this phase I/II trial of olaparib plus temozolomide in pts with recurrent SCLC, pts were sequentially enrolled into two cohorts defined by dosing schedule. In cohort 1, olaparib was dosed on D1-7 of each 21d cycle. In cohort 2, olaparib was dosed on D1-21. Temozolomide was dosed on D1-7 in both cohorts. Each cohort had a phase I portion (conventional 3+3 dose-escalation) for determination of MTD and RP2D and a phase II portion with primary endpoint of ORR. Per protocol, eligible pts could have untreated asymptomatic brain mets &lt; 1cm and, after mandatory baseline imaging, CNS imaging was performed at investigator’s discretion. A post-hoc exploratory analysis of CNS-specific outcomes was performed using modified RECIST criteria (Long GV, Lancet Oncol 2012) in which brain mets ≥5mm were considered measurable, and intracranial response was independently assessed by an attending radiologist. Results: 66 pts with median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range, 1-7) were enrolled, 50 pts in cohort 1 and 16 pts in cohort 2. 33/66 (50%) pts had history of brain mets, 15/66 (23%) pts had untreated brain mets at enrollment. The confirmed ORR of cohort 2 was 7% (1/14 evaluable pts, 95% CI: 0.2-33.9%), and the updated confirmed ORR of the entire study population was 34% (21/62 evaluable pts, 95% CI: 22.3-47.0%). The most common adverse events were hematologic toxicities (thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia). 22/50 (44%) of cohort 1 pts and 4/16 (25%) of cohort 2 pts required dose reduction. Of 15 pts with untreated brain mets, best overall intracranial response (including both confirmed and unconfirmed responses) was CR in 6 pts, PR in 4 pts, SD in 3 pts and PD in 1 for a CNS disease control rate of 87% (95% CI: 59.5-98.3%). Of 10 pts with CR/PR as their best intracranial response, 4 responses were confirmed. With non-CNS progression as a competing risk, the probability of CNS progression among the entire study population was 17% (95% CI: 8.8-26.7%) at 6 months and 21% (95% CI: 12.1-32.0%) at 12 months. Conclusions: Olaparib and temozolomide may be an effective therapy for relapsed SCLC, especially for pts with CNS disease where we observed a high rate of intracranial disease control. Ongoing analyses regarding optimal dosing schedule will inform potential for future use of this combination. Clinical trial information: NCT02446704.