Abstract 1228: Spatial transcriptomics: Data processing revisited to address noise interference
Authors: Levi van Hijfte, Marjolein Geurts, Wies R. Vallentgoed, Paul H. Eilers, Peter A. Sillevis Smitt, Reno Debets, Pim J. French
Journal: Cancer Research (2022)

Abstract Background: Spatially resolved transcriptomics is a novel and already highly recognized method that allows RNA sequencing results to be annotated with local tissue phenotypes. The NanoString GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) Platform allows users to collect RNA expression data from manually selected Regions of Interest (ROIs) on FFPE tissue sections. Here, we extensively evaluated data from the DSP platform with its associated pipeline and identify significant background noise interference issues which compromise data interpretation. Alternative and more suitable workflows are presented for correct data analysis. Methods: In this study, 12 paired tumor samples were collected from six glioma patients who underwent two separate resections. For all patients, the first resection was a low grade astrocytoma (WHO grade II or III) and the second resection was a high grade astrocytoma (WHO grade IV). The DSP platform was used to collect expression data of 1,800 genes from 72 ROIs (i.e. 6 per sample). Biological replicates were made of eight tumors from four patients. Gene expression data was normalized with both standard NanoString methods and several alternative methods (e.g. DeSeq2, gamma fit correction and quantile normalization). Weighted Gene Co-expression Network analysis (WGCNA) was used for biological validation. In addition to our own study, six publicly available NanoString DSP datasets were evaluated. Results: Data distributions of all glioma samples, when exposed to standard data processing, were burdened with significant background noise interference. Notably, differences in noise interference were largest between biologically distinct tumor subgroups (i.e. between first and second glioma resections), which was confirmed in replicate experiments. The noise interference patterns were also present in all six publicly available NanoString DSP datasets which will invariably lead to incorrect interpretation of the underlying biology. To correct for noise interference, we tested several normalization methods. The relatively crude quantile normalization method provided the least biased result and showed the highest concordance with bulk RNA sequencing data. To evaluate the biological validity of our alternative approach, we used T cell counts from our tissue regions as an independent parameter, that were quantified using immune fluorescence. Unsupervised WGCNA identified gene clusters enriched for lymphocyte genes that highly correlated with T cell quantities in ROIs, confirming that alternative normalization can extract a biological signal from the DSP platform. Conclusion: The DSP Platform platform suffers from significant noise interference when using standard analysis tools that obscure its results. Here, we revised the workflow and provide an alternative normalization that adequately addresses noise interference and enables correct interpretation of gene expression data. Citation Format: Levi van Hijfte, Marjolein Geurts, Wies R. Vallentgoed, Paul H. Eilers, Peter A. Sillevis Smitt, Reno Debets, Pim J. French. Spatial transcriptomics: Data processing revisited to address noise interference [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1228.