tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Inherited risk for prostate cancer (PCa): Following the natural history of men with high-risk genetics using multiparametric MRI (mpMRI).
Authors: Anna Couvillon, Baris Turkbey, Peter L. Choyke, Katherine Lee-Wisdom, Yolanda McKinney, Robert Sidlow, Michael P. Mullane, Veda N. Giri, Todd Matthew Morgan, Heather H. Cheng, Maria J. Merino, William Douglas Figg, Peter A. Pinto, William L. Dahut, Fatima Karzai
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

390 Background: PCa has inherited risk factors including high genetic risk variants such as BRCA1/2, HOXB13, and DNA mismatch repair genes. mpMRI has been shown to be effective for detection and staging of localized PCa. This study follows participants (prts), born biologically male, without a diagnosis of PCa with known germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PV) in BRCA1/2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM, HOXB13, ATM, NBN, TP53, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C/D, BRIP1, or FANCA-FANCM (NCT03805919). Methods: Up to 500 eligible prts 30-75 years old (yo) with a documented germline PV will enroll. Prts undergo biennial clinical exam and mpMRI, and annual PSA monitoring and are followed at 12-month intervals to determine PSA, prostate cancer diagnosis, and/or disease/survival status until death. Indication for prostate biopsy includes clinical or imaging findings. Biopsy specimens undergo molecular analyses. Results: To date, 175 prts have been enrolled: 169 (97%) White, 3 Hispanic (2%), 1 African American (1%), 1 Asian (1%), and 1 biethnic (1%). Median age is 47 yo. The most common monoallelic PV are: 48.6% BRCA2, 25.1% BRCA1, 6.3% CHEK2 and 5.7% MSH2. PVs in ATM, PALB2, HOXB13, PMS2, MLH1, MSH6, BRIP1, EPCAM and RAD51D are ≤4%. One subject carries three distinct PVs ( BRCA2, CHEK2, BRIP1). Indication for biopsy was found in 26.3% of prts with 22/46 (47.8%) with a PIRADS 4 lesion, 6/46 (13.0%) PIRADS 3 lesion, 12/46 (26.1%) elevated PSA (median=2.8 ng/mL) or 6/46 (13.0%) due to clinical discretion. Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed on 13/39 (33.3%) biopsies with median age at diagnosis=59 yo. 9/13 (69%) prts had a PSA &lt;3 ng/ml at diagnosis. Nine prts were diagnosed with ISUP Grade Group (GG) 1, 3 with GG2, and 1 with GG3. Eight prts opted for active surveillance (AS), 2 for radiation therapy (RT), and 3 for prostatectomy (RP). Two prts on AS converted to definitive treatment (one RP and one RT) due to progression in GG on the year 1 AS biopsy. Conclusions: mpMRI screening in men with germline PV can be used for diagnosis and monitoring of PCa and facilitates detection below conventional PSA thresholds in a high genetic risk setting. Access to genetic testing and other variables need to be addressed in underrepresented minorities. Correlative studies, including cfDNA and PBMCs, are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03805919 . [Table: see text]
Outcomes of post-progression therapies in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) progressing after docetaxel (DOC): Real-world data from an Italian multicenter observational study (ECHOS trial).
Authors: Orazio Caffo, Marco Maruzzo, Alessandro Samuelly, Gaetano Facchini, Elisa Zanardi, Maurizio Nicodemo, Paola Ermacora, Mariella Sorarù, Luca Galli, Carlo Cattrini, Nicolo Borsellino, Sebastiano Buti, Sara Elena Rebuzzi, Roberto Iacovelli, Alessandro Rametta, Nicola Calvani, Monica Giordano, Azzurra Farnesi, Lucia Fratino, Umberto Basso
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

171 Background: The introduction of DOC in mCSPC raises the issue concerning the best therapeutic strategy after pts’ progression. Different options are available: a switch strategy with an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI), an alternative chemotherapy-based strategy based on cabazitaxel (CABA), or a re-challenge strategy by using DOC again. In this view, it could be of interest to describe the outcomes of post-progression strategies adopted in the real-world. From 2014, ECHOS multicenter study is collecting real world data from mCSPC pts in Italy. Here, we present post-progression preliminary findings of 568 pts treated with DOC and enrolled in the study within 31 December 2021. Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of the mCSPC pts treated with DOC in 34 Italian Institutions. For each pt we recorded pre- and post-DOC clinical history, baseline characteristics, treatment details and clinical outcomes. Results: Among the 568 pts, after a median follow-up of 22 mos, 389 pts experienced disease progression and 227 died. The progression occurred after a median of 10.4 mos (range 0.3-62.1). Among the progressed pts, 47 did not received further active treatment, while 342 received at least one systemic treatment after progression. The most frequent post-progression treatment was ARSI (73.1%), followed by CABA (19%), combination of ARSI and PARP inhibitors within clinical trials (2.6%), DOC re-challenge (2.1%), platinum-based chemotherapy (1.8%), and radium 223 (0.9%). The outcomes of the first-line agents and the number of subsequent administered life-prolonging agents (LPA) are described. The length of disease control obtained with DOC influenced the duration of first post-progression therapy: in pts who progressed after DOC within 10.4 mos, the duration was significantly shorter than in pts with later disease progression (5.9 mos vs 9.8 mos, p &lt; 0.0001). Noteworthy, pts with more aggressive disease leading to a faster progression received more frequently CABA than ARSI: disease progression after DOC in CABA group and in ARSI group occurred with a median of 9.1 mos and 13.2 mos, respectively (p = 0.002). Conclusions: This is one of the largest real-world report on the outcomes of first post-progression therapies after DOC in mCSPC pts. We showed that ARSI-based therapy is the most common strategy adopted after DOC progression. Our findings suggested a different first post-progression strategy according to the time of post-DOC progression onset. [Table: see text]
A phase II single-arm trial of niraparib in platinum-sensitive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair defects (PLATPARP).
Authors: Vivek Narayan, Alexandra Torres, Philip Seger, Megan Aaron, Jennifer Louie, Daniel Lee, Naomi B. Haas, Samuel U Takvorian, Kara Noelle Maxwell, Susan M. Domchek
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

TPS291 Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy, either as monotherapy or in combination with taxanes, is increasingly used for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harboring germline and/or somatic homologous recombination repair gene mutations (HRRm). However, clinical responses with platinum-based therapy are often of limited duration and limited by cumulative toxicities. The PARP inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib is approved for the treatment of mCRPC patients with pathogenic HRRm after progression on enzalutamide or abiraterone. Importantly, sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy may predict improved clinical outcomes with PARPi, and ‘maintenance’ PARPi strategies are routinely used in patients with advanced ovarian and pancreatic malignancies with HRRm with initial clinical response to platinum chemotherapy. We hypothesize that maintenance niraparib, a PARPi with demonstrated activity in mCRPC with HRRm, will prolong clinical responses to platinum-based chemotherapy with acceptable toxicity in mCRPC patients harboring germline and/or somatic HRRm. Methods: We are conducting an open-label, single-arm, phase II study to evaluate the clinical benefit of maintenance niraparib in biomarker-defined, platinum-sensitive mCRPC patients. Eligible subjects harbor a pathogenic germline and/or somatic mutation in BRCA1/2, ATM, FANCA, CDK12, RAD51B, RAD54L, PALB2, CHEK2, HDAC2, or BRIP1 and have received at least 3 cycles (or minimum 9 weeks) of platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of mCRPC per investigator discretion. Following ³4 weeks since completion of chemotherapy, subjects without evidence of clinical or radiographic disease progression receive investigational treatment with maintenance niraparib (starting dose 200 mg daily). The primary objective is an improvement in 6 month PFS rate (PFS6) (H0: PFS6 rate 25%; H1: PFS6 rate 50%; power 0.77 with one-sided α = 0.05). Serial plasma samples are obtained for correlative analyses of markers of response and/or resistance to maintenance niraparib. Eight of a planned total of 18 subjects have enrolled (N=3 germline BRCA2; N=2 somatic BRCA2; N=1 germline PALB2; N=1 germline ATM; N=1 germline CHEK2). This study incorporates a novel, combined genetic and clinical patient-selection approach for PARPi therapy to optimize clinical outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT04288687 .
CYCLONE 3: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of abemaciclib in combination with abiraterone plus prednisone in men with high-risk, metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).
Authors: Matthew Raymond Smith, Nobuaki Matsubara, Rana R. McKay, Josep M. Piulats, Tilman Todenhöfer, Tian Zhang, Nicolas Fasnacht, Sarah Sherwood, Erica L. Johnston, Clare Schaverien, Andrew Lithio, Karim Nacerddine, Neeraj Agarwal
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

TPS289 Background: Landmark trials have established a survival benefit for novel hormonal agents (NHA) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for mHSPC. Yet, there is a significant medical need to expand therapeutic options, especially for pts with high-risk mHSPC who experience poorer outcomes. Abemaciclib is an oral selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4 &amp; 6) dosed on a continuous schedule, approved for the treatment of node-positive high-risk early-stage and advanced or metastatic HR+, HER2- breast cancer. Analogous to the estrogen receptor signaling pathway in breast cancer, there is evidence that the androgen receptor axis activates CDK4 &amp; 6 to sustain prostate cancer cell proliferation, and upregulation of cyclin D1 is a potential mechanism of resistance to NHA therapy. In preclinical models, abemaciclib induces cell cycle arrest and inhibition of prostate tumor growth. Methods: CYCLONE 3 (NCT05288166) is a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the addition of abemaciclib to abiraterone+prednisone (AP) in pts with high-risk mHSPC. Approximately 900 pts with high-risk mHSPC defined by ≥4 bone metastasis and/or visceral disease will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to the AP + abemaciclib or AP + placebo arm. Up to 3 months of ADT prior to randomization is permitted; prior D for mHSPC will be excluded per planned protocol amendment. Pts who have not undergone orchiectomy will continue ADT. Stratification factors are de novo mHSPC and visceral metastases. Primary endpoint is investigator-assessed radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). Key secondary endpoints include rPFS assessed by blinded independent central review, castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival, overall survival, time to pain progression, safety and pharmacokinetics. Enrollment is open at approximately 270 sites across 25 countries. Clinical trial information: NCT05288166 .
Quality of life in QUILT 3.032 study: Patients with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) receiving IL-15RαFc superagonist N-803 plus BCG.
Authors: Karim Chamie, Sam S. Chang, Eugene V. Kramolowsky, Mark L. Gonzalgo, Stanislav Lechpammer, Sandeep K. Reddy, Patrick Soon-Shiong
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

495 Background: Patients (pts) with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC have limited treatment options and are at an increased risk for cystectomy. Nogapendekin alfa inbakicept (NAI, also known as N-803), is an interleukin-15 superagonist (IL-15RαFc), which synergizes with BCG to elicit innate immune memory resulting in durable complete responses (CRs) in this patient population. In an open-label, 3-cohort, multicenter Phase 2/3 study of intravesical BCG plus NAI in BCG-unresponsive high-grade NMIBC (QUILT 3.032; NCT03022825), pts with carcinoma in situ (CIS; Cohort A) have a CR rate of 71% (median duration 26.6 months), 89.2% cystectomy avoidance and 100% bladder cancer specific survival at 24 months. We submit here the first quality of life (QOL) data report in the same pts cohort. Methods: Cohort A: 86 pts (median age 73 years; 87% male) with histologically confirmed BCG-unresponsive CIS with or without Ta/T1 disease, treated with intravesical BCG 50 mg plus NAI 400 μg. Mean baseline ECOG score was 0.183, with 82% of pts having score = 0. QOL was measured by the EORTC QOL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and QOL NIMBC-Specific 24 Questionnaire (QLQ-NMIBC24). Results: Multivariate analyses have shown no significant changes over time for any of the measured QOL domains. Mild worsening vs. baseline in feeling ill was reported by 6% and 3% of pts by week 27 and 52, while 4% and 6% reported improvement. By week 78 and 104, 7% and 9% of pts reported improvement vs. baseline in their wellbeing with the majority being stable (non-significant). No statistically significant variations were detected in the physical function (PF) score (baseline vs. week 27, 52, 78 and 104). Higher PF scores were observed in pts responding to the therapy vs. non-responders; however, baseline value of PF was also higher in responders vs. non-responders. In contrast to historical results of BCG alone, week 27 physical function scores were numerically higher than baseline, with a subsequent nadir at week 78 and recovery to baseline by week 104 (non-significant). Hospitalizations for any reason remained low (0% - 6% per assessments) during the study. Conclusions: QOL measurement supports good tolerability of the intravesical NAI plus BCG in BCG-unresponsive, high-grade NMIBC pts with CIS. These results further strengthen the evidence of a favorable benefit: risk ratio of this novel combination immunotherapy, in a challenging disease. Clinical trial information: NCT03022825 .
Oral EPI-7386 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Authors: Russell Kent Pachynski, Nicholas Iannotti, Andrew Leonard Laccetti, Bradley Curtis Carthon, Kim N. Chi, Matthew Raymond Smith, Nicholas J. Vogelzang, Wilson Tu, Edmond Michael Kwan, Alexander William Wyatt, Karen Villaluna, Brett Younginger, Alessandra Cesano
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

177 Background: EPI-7386 is a next generation aniten, a novel class of compounds designed to inhibit androgen receptor (AR) activity by binding to the N-terminal domain. Preclinical data supports disruption of AR regulated gene transcription even in the presence of resistance mechanisms including ligand-binding domain point mutations and truncated splice variants. Here we report results of the Part 1a first-in-human trial of EPI-7386 in mCRPC (NCT04421222). Methods: This Phase 1, open-label, multicenter, dose escalation (Part 1a) and expansion (Part 1b) trial was designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of EPI-7386 in mCRPC patients (pts) progressing on standard of care treatment, including next generation antiandrogen(s) and chemotherapy. Originally designed to assess up to 5 doses of EPI-7386 (200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 mg QD), two additional cohorts were added examining 400 and 600 mg BID due to 600 mg QD showing exposure saturation while demonstrating a favorable safety profile. Results: 31 pts were enrolled in the QD cohorts and 8 in the BID cohorts. Pts had a median of 4 lines of prior therapy for mCRPC: 83% received abiraterone and at least one next generation AR inhibitor, and 58% had at least one line of prior chemotherapy. No DLTs were observed; EPI-7386 was safe and well tolerated at all doses/schedules evaluated. All related adverse events (AEs) were Grade 1 and 2 and consistent with AEs associated with second-generation antiandrogens. For doses above 400 mg QD, exposures were at or above those associated with antitumor activity in animal models. Evidence of antitumor activity (including significant and durable PSA responses and/or decreases in ctDNA, and/or radiographically documented tumor shrinkage) were observed in pts with fewer than 3 lines of treatment for mCRPC, no visceral metastases and no prior chemotherapy (9/31 pts). Conclusions: Part 1a treatment with EPI-7386 monotherapy was safe, well tolerated up to a daily dose of 1200 mg (600 mg BID), achieved target clinical exposures and showed preliminary signals of antitumor activity in heavily-pretreated mCRPC. Part 1b is open with enrollment focused on pre-chemotherapy, post-second generation antiandrogen treated mCRPC pts in one cohort, and treatment-naïve non-mCRPC pts in a window of opportunity proof-of-concept second cohort. Two doses will be evaluated (600 mg BID and QD) based on FDA Project Optimus recommendations. Clinical trial information: NCT04421222 .
Long-term safety and tolerability of darolutamide and duration of treatment in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) from the ARAMIS Rollover Study.
Authors: Neal D. Shore, Murilo de Almeida Luz, Albertas Ulys, Jorge A. Ortiz, Shankar Srinivasan, Etah Kurland, Karim Fizazi
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

147 Background: Darolutamide (DARO) significantly improved metastasis-free survival by ~2 y and reduced the risk of death by 31% vs placebo, with a favorable safety profile in patients (pts) with nmCRPC (ARAMIS study; NCT02200614). We report long-term safety and tolerability with continued DARO treatment in the ARAMIS Rollover Study (ROS; NCT04464226). Methods: Following the primary analysis of double-blind (DB) treatment, the ARAMIS study was unblinded, and all pts were permitted to continue on open-label (OL) DARO. After study completion, pts could continue DARO in the ROS if they had no evidence of metastases and were benefitting clinically. Of 955 pts initially randomized to DARO, 954 pts started DB DARO, 466 continued to OL DARO, and 294 entered the ROS. Pts received DARO 600 mg orally twice daily. DARO safety and treatment duration are described for the 954 pts over the DB, DB+OL, and DB+OL+ROS periods, with a data cutoff of Jan 31, 2022. Results: The median (range) treatment duration was 1.5 y (0.0–4.0) for DB DARO, 2.1 y (0.0–4.9) for DB+OL DARO, and 2.8 y (0.0–6.8) for DB+OL+ROS DARO. By the data cutoff date, 62.4% of the 954 pts had received DARO for ≥2 years, 30.1% for ≥4 years, and 12.8% for ≥5 yrs; 24.0% were still receiving DARO at data cutoff. Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) increased slightly as expected with longer observation time: any grade (DB 85.7%; DB+OL 89.8%; DB+OL+ROS 91.5%), grade 3/4 (26.3%; 31.8%; 35.5%), serious (26.1%; 32.1%; 38.5%), and leading to treatment discontinuation (8.9%; 10.5%; 12.9%). Increases in incidences of TEAEs of special interest across the DB, DB+OL, and DB+OL+ROS periods were mostly minimal. Conclusions: Approximately 30% of pts with nmCRPC remained on DARO for ≥4 y, suggesting long-term clinical benefit. The favorable safety profile of DARO was maintained with long-term exposure. No new safety concerns were observed with longer DARO treatment in the ROS. Clinical trial information: NCT04464226 . [Table: see text]
AtezoCab: A phase II study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with non-measurable disease (NMD).
Authors: Umang Swami, Julian Brown, Alena Turner, Benjamin Haaland, Kristen Jones, Vinay Mathew Thomas, Kamal Kant Kant Sahu, Haoran Li, Tenzin Kunsang Phunrab, Julia Batten, Lindsay Maxwell, Jennifer Lloyd, Manish Kohli, Sumati Gupta, Kelli Thorne, Benjamin L. Maughan, Neeraj Agarwal
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

TPS295 Background: Preclinical studies and clinical observations suggest that C promotes an immune permissive environment, which might lead to synergistic effects from combination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. In Cohort 6 of COSMIC-021 study, the combination of C and A showed encouraging clinical activity and acceptable tolerability in mCRPC pts who had radiographically progressed in soft tissue on or after novel hormonal treatment (NHT; PMID: 35690072). CONTACT-02 is a phase 3 study randomizing pts with mCRPC with measurable disease 1:1 to C+A or NHT (NCT04446117). The objective of this study is to specifically evaluate the safety and efficacy of C+A in pts with mCRPC with NMD. Methods: AtezoCab is an IRB approved, investigator-initiated, single-arm, single-center, open-label, non-randomized phase 2 study of C+A in mCRPC patients with NMD to assess disease control rate (DCR). Treatment: C 40 mg oral daily + A 1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. Treatment continues until progression or intolerable toxicities. Key inclusion criteria: ≥18 years age, mCRPC with histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma without small cell histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2, adequate organ function, prior treatment with NHT, only NMD outside the pelvis (above aortic bifurcation) per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Key exclusion criteria: prior chemotherapy for mCRPC, prior treatment with C, immune checkpoint inhibitors or other systemic immunostimulatory agents, active or history of clinically significant autoimmune disease per treating physician, corticosteroids (&gt; 10 mg daily prednisone equivalent) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days before first dose of study treatment. Primary endpoint: Percentage of pts with disease control. DCR will be defined as the percentage of pts with confirmed response of any duration or stable disease or noncomplete response or nonprogressive disease for 24 weeks or longer per PCWG3-modified RECIST v1.1. Up to 33 pts will be enrolled for a total of 30 evaluable pts. This will ensure that DCR can be estimated via a 95% confidence interval (CI) with margin of error &lt;0.18. The primary analysis CI on DCR will be based on Wilson’s approach. Secondary Endpoints: Progression-free survival (PSA and radiographic), PSA50% response rate, overall survival and safety. Tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. 7 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT05168618 .