P1724: QUALITY OF LIFE AND UNMET NEEDS AMONG PH-NEGATIVE MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASM PATIENTS: RESULTS OF THE NATIONWIDE SURVEY
Authors: T. Ionova, E. Andreevskaya, E. Babich, N. Bulieva, O. Vinogradova, E. Volodicheva, S. Voloshin, N. Glonina, S. Dubov, N. Esefieva, E. Zinina, M. Ivanova, T. Klitochenko, A. Kopylova, A. Kulagin, G. Kuchma, O. Li, E. Lomaia, A. Melikyan, V. Melnichenko, S. Menshakova, T. Mitina, E. Morozova, E. Osipova, O. Ochirova, A. Polyakov, T. Pospelova, A. Proydakov, O. Rukavitsyn, G. Safuanova, I. Subortseva, M. Fominykh, M. Frolova, T. Shelekhova, D. Sherstnev, T. Shneyder, V. Shuvaev, E. Laane, E. Oliva, S. Salek, T. Nikitina
Journal: HemaSphere (2022)

Background: Patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including myelofibrosis (MF), polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET), experience troublesome symptoms leading to impaired functioning (physical and psychosocial) and quality of life (QoL). Understanding symptom burden, QoL and unmet patient needs across disease subgroups is of value to aid optimal treatment and rehabilitation decision-making for patients with different MPNs. It is also worthy to explore perceptions on the impact of the disease and its treatment among MPN patients and hematologists to ensure patient-centered care. Aims: The national survey MPN-QoL-2020 was aimed to evaluate QoL and symptom burden in patients with MPN, as well as to examine the perceptions of patients and physicians about the impact of MPN and its treatment in a real world setting in Russia. Methods: A survey of patients with MPN and their treating physicians was conducted from September to December 2020. This survey included in- or out-patients aged ≥18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of MF, PV, or ET. All the patients completed the HM-PRO, a hematological malignancy (HM) specific patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure, the MPN10 symptom assessment tool, and a patient’s survey checklist. The HM-PRO consists of two scales: Part A measuring the ‘impact on patients’ QoL’; Part B measuring ‘signs and symptoms’ experienced by the patients. Part A has 4 domains: physical behaviour (PB), social well-being (SW), emotional behaviour (EB) and eating and drinking habits (ED). Physicians completed a physician’s survey checklist which included a record for each patient. Both paper and electronic versions of the survey forms were available. ANOVA and χ2 test were applied to examine the differences between groups. Results: 1100 patients with MPNs (MF, n=355, PV, n= 408 and ET, n=337; mean age = 58±14 yrs; female = 61%) and 100 hematologists (mean age = 42±12 yrs, female = 85%) from 37 medical centers completed the survey. The HM-PRO Parts A & B total scores were significantly worse (higher scores) in MF and PV patients than in ET (Table 1). Impact on PB and EB was higher in MF and PV as compared to ET: PB = 28.6 and 21.4 vs 14.3; EB = 31.8 and 27.3 vs 22.7, respectively. Impact on ED was higher in MF as compared to PV and ET. SF was less impaired and similar across different MPNs. Among MF there were more patients with moderate/large effect on QoL as compared to PV and ET – 40% vs 34% and 28% (p=0.003). The vast majority of MPN patients experienced symptoms (95%); more than 80% had fatigue and inactivity. The MPN10 Total Symptom Score was the highest in MF, intermediate in PV and the lowest in ET: 24 vs 20 vs 14 (p<0.001). Notably, 29% MF, 34% PV and 44% ET patients did not attribute their symptoms to MPN. Physicians and patients had a discordant perspective of the most bothersome symptoms. There was agreement between MF patients and their physicians about the impact of the disease on QoL and symptom burden. For PV and ET, physicians underestimated patient’s concerns; the discrepancies were pronounced for QoL impact (PV, p=0.028; ET, p<0.001) and symptom burden (PV, p=0.018; ET, p<0.001). Across MPNs, 41.5% MF, 37.8% PV and 35.2% ET agreed that there were areas of patient-physician relationship needed to be improved. Image:Summary/Conclusion: The findings of this nationwide survey demonstrate differences in the impact on QoL and symptom burden across MPNs, identify the areas of different perspective between patients and physicians about MPN and its treatment as well as highlight the unmet needs among patients with MPN.