POS1496-HPR HARD TIMES: ADAPTING A FATIGUE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME IN A PANDEMIC
Authors: J. Dobson, D. Dockrell, K. Berg, H. Harris
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2022)

Background Fatigue is a symptom of many Rheumatology Conditions (1). Hewlett et al have shown that a Fatigue Management programme (FMP) is effective in reducing fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients (2). In 2019, a 7-week group-based FMP was developed using a cognitive behavioural approach for Rheumatology patients in NHS Lothian (Scotland). In 2020, due to COVID-19, the in person FMP was adapted for virtual delivery. Referral criteria included Visual Analogue Scale-Fatigue (VAS-F) of ≥6/10 and an inflammatory rheumatic disease diagnosis. The FMP participants recorded Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) prior to and on completion of the FMP. In August 2021 demand for the FMP far outweighed the capacity of the delivery team and therefore the original 7-week FMP was further adapted to a 4-week programme. This was achieved by focusing on four core elements (i) sleep, (ii) thoughts, emotions and behaviours, (iii) energy conservation, (iv) setbacks. Objectives The primary objective was to evaluate whether the 4-week programme produced comparable PROMs results to the 7-week programme. In doing so, the aim was to maintain efficacy of the programme and provide increased capacity by offering more groups in the same timeframe. Methods Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and VAS-F were selected for comparison between pre and post FMP PROMs results, these being the main indicators of improvement in fatigue management. Fisher’s exact test was used to determine any difference between the PROMs results reported at the end of both programmes. Participants who reported that their PROMs result were the same, worse or who did not respond, were all placed into the category “Other”. The FMP team recorded the average waiting time for those attending each group. The length of the waiting list at any one time was calculated by removing those who were not interested, had been referred elsewhere, or who did not respond to the invitation, from the total number of referrals received by the FMP team. Results There was no significant difference in FSS and VAS-F results reported by the participants in both groups at the end of the FMPs as determined by Fisher’s exact test (Table 1). Waiting list times reduced from 24 weeks in August 2021 to 6 weeks in December 2021 as a result of the adaptation of the FMP from a 7-week programme to a 4-week programme (Figure 1). Table 1. Reported differences between pre-FMP and post-FMP PROMs. 7 Week FMP (n = 25) 4 Week FMP (n = 13) Fischer Exact FSS Improved 72% 77% p = 1.000 Other 28% 23% VAS Improved 80% 69% p = 0.689 Other 20% 31% Figure 1. - Review of average waiting times experienced by each group. In August 2021, the decision was made to trial a 4-week FMP to counter large increases in average waiting times. Conclusion A 4-week FMP is as effective at improving the management of fatigue in Rheumatology patients as a 7-week FMP and reduces patient waiting times. More research is required to bolster the evidence base to support this novel approach. References [1]Overman, C.L., Kool, M.B., Da Silva, J.A.P. et al. The prevalence of severe fatigue in rheumatic diseases: an international study. Clin Rheumatol 35, 409–415 (2016). [2]Hewlett, S., et al., Group cognitive–behavioural programme to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis fatigue: the RAFT RCT with economic and qualitative evaluations. Health Technology Assessment 23(57), 1-130 (2019). Disclosure of Interests Joanne Dobson: None declared, Dervil Dockrell: None declared, Kathryn Berg: None declared, Helen Harris Speakers bureau: Galapagos