Real-world outcomes of Asian patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma treated with first-line BRAF/MEK inhibitors, anti-PD-1 monotherapy, or combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab: A multicenter retrospective study in Japan (B-CHECK-RWD study).
Authors: Kenjiro Namikawa, Takamichi Ito, Shusuke Yoshikawa, Koji Yoshino, Yukiko Kiniwa, Tatsuya Takenouchi, Hiroshi Kato, Satoru Mizuhashi, Yosuke Yamamoto, Yasuhiro Fujisawa, Osamu Yamasaki, Yasuhiro Nakamura, Jun Asai, Takeo Maekawa, Shigeto Matsushita, Eiji Nakano, Kohei Oashi, Hisashi Uhara, Takuya Miyagawa, Naoya Yamazaki
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2022)

e21553 Background: The systemic treatment for advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma includes BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi), anti-PD-1 monotherapy (aPD1), and the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO/IPI). Several studies have demonstrated favorable survival benefits for those treated with immunotherapy upfront. Most of these studies, however, were conducted among Caucasian-dominant cohorts; evidence for Asian patients is limited. Therefore, our objective was to assess the efficacy of first-line therapies for Asian patients in a real-world setting. Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of Asian patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma treated with first-line BRAF/MEKi, aPD1, or NIVO/IPI from 26 institutions in Japan. Clinical outcomes were determined by assessing the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) by first-line therapies. Kaplan‐Meier curves and log‐rank tests, as well as multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate survival probabilities. Results: We identified 316 Asian patients treated with first-line BRAF/MEKi (n = 224), aPD1 (n = 59), or NIVO/IPI (n = 33) between 2016 and 2021. At baseline, the median age of the patients in each treatment arm was 63, 62, and 54, respectively (p = 0.053). The ORR in the first-line therapy was 69%, 29%, and 27%, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). With a median follow-up of 18.9 months, the median PFS was 16.2, 5.6, and 6.4 months (p = 0.001); and the median OS was 36.9, 37.9 months, and not reached (p = 0.386), respectively. In a multivariable analysis, the predictive factors of short PFS were first-line therapy with aPD1 (HR, 2.44; 95%CI, 1.70-3.50, p &lt; 0.001) or NIVO/IPI (1.73; 1.06–2.83, p = 0.029), BRAF V600K (p = 0.031), ECOG PS ≥2 (p = 0.011), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (p = 0.001), and M1a/M1c/M1d stages (p = 0.036/ &lt; 0.001/ &lt; 0.001, respectively). Predictive factors of short OS were BRAF V600K (p = 0.042), ECOG PS ≥2 (p = 0.001), elevated LDH levels (p &lt; 0.001), and M1c/M1d stages (both p &lt; 0.001). The OS did not differ significantly by first-line therapies between BRAF/MEKi, aPD1 (1.52; 0.98–2.34, p = 0.061), and NIVO/IPI (0.63; 0.31–1.27, p = 0.194). Conclusions: Although upfront NIVO/IPI showed the longest OS numerically, its superiority over BRAF/MEKi in Asian patients seems to be modest compared with Caucasian patients. Because upfront BRAF/MEKi showed an OS that was comparable with that of aPD1, BRAF/MEKi remains an active first-line therapy option, especially for those who are not amenable to take the high risk of immune-related toxicities.