Abstract 3225: Real-world surveillance from cancer patients about their experience of comprehensive genomic profiling tests in Japan
Authors: Katsutoshi Oda, Hidenori Kage, Manabu Muto, Katsuya Tsuchihara, Natsuko Okita, Yusuke Okuma, Junko Kikuchi, Hidekazu Shirota, Hideyuki Hayashi, Toshio Kokuryo, Daisuke Sakai, Akira Hirasawa, Makoto Kubo, Hirotsugu Kenmotsu, Nana Akiyama, Hyangri Chang, Aya Shinozaki-Ushiku, Masahiko Tanabe, Tetsuo Ushiku, Kaori Muto, Kiyoshi Miyagawa, Yasuyuki Seto
Journal: Cancer Research (2023)

Abstract Introduction: Over 40,000 cancer patients have taken comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests under health insurance coverage in Japan since June 2019. However, the indication is limited only to cancer patients who have finished (or are expected to finish) standard treatments. The aim of this study is to evaluate patients’ outcomes, levels of understanding, and satisfaction of the patients who received CGP tests. Methods: We performed a nationwide surveillance of 933 cancer patients who examined CGP tests at 80 institutions in Japan under the approval of the institutional ethics committee. The responses to the questionnaire (either web-based or paper-based) were from patients (81.6%) or their families (18.4%). Results: The range of patients’ age was 70s at 29.6%, followed by 60s at 26.8%, and 50s at 20.8%. The level of understanding during informed consent for the CGP tests {11 scales from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)} were 7 or higher in 70.8%, and those about their test results were 7 or higher in 75.2 %. The information was predominantly provided by attending physicians (78.0%) or physicians specialized in genomic medicine (19.6%), and limitedly from cancer genome medical coordinators (11.4%) and nurses (10.4%). The patients underwent FoundationOne CDx® (56.3%), FoundationOne Liquid CDx® (11.6%), or a domestic tumor/normal paired panel (OncoGuideTM NCC Oncopanel System, 14.4%). 16.2% of the patients could not recall which CGP test they received. New treatments based on the CGP testing were suggested in 46.8%, and 20.8% of them were treated with a suggested treatment by an expert panel (i.e., molecular tumor board). The treatment type was (i) approved drugs, 70.3%, (ii) clinical trials, 16.5%, (iii) patient-proposed national basket trial, 3.2%, and (iv) off-label use, 1.1%. 77.4% of the patients requested disclosure of germline findings, 10.5% declined, and 11.4% did not remember their decision. Overall satisfaction scores (11 scales) were found to be 7 or higher at 64.6%. The reasons for satisfaction included having the opportunity to learn about cancer risks of relatives (21.0%), having received detailed explanation (19.7%), having received information on new therapies (18.4%), and having the opportunity to learn about their cancer in detail (15.9%). The reason for lower scores (6 or lower) was mainly due to not receiving recommendations to a genome-matched therapy (58.3%). Conclusion: Our surveillance highlighted the significance of drug accessibility, information from interdisciplinary collaboration team, and appropriate information about the test results. The opportunity to learn about their cancer in detail was valuable for the patients as well, even when the results of CGP testing did not lead to a novel therapy. Citation Format: Katsutoshi Oda, Hidenori Kage, Manabu Muto, Katsuya Tsuchihara, Natsuko Okita, Yusuke Okuma, Junko Kikuchi, Hidekazu Shirota, Hideyuki Hayashi, Toshio Kokuryo, Daisuke Sakai, Akira Hirasawa, Makoto Kubo, Hirotsugu Kenmotsu, Nana Akiyama, Hyangri Chang, Aya Shinozaki-Ushiku, Masahiko Tanabe, Tetsuo Ushiku, Kaori Muto, Kiyoshi Miyagawa, Yasuyuki Seto. Real-world surveillance from cancer patients about their experience of comprehensive genomic profiling tests in Japan [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3225.