A prospective study exploring the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma potential in current real-world practice.
Authors: Kazufumi Kobayashi, Sadahisa Ogasawara, Susumu Maruta, Tomomi Okubo, Michihisa Moriguchi, Hiroaki Kanzaki, Keisuke Koroki, Naoya Kanogawa, Yuki Shiko, Yosuke Inaba, Kazuyoshi Nakamura, Ryosaku Azemoto, Kenji Ito, Shinichiro Okabe, Masanori Atsukawa, Ei Itobayashi, Masafumi Ikeda, Naoki Morimoto, Yoshito Itoh, Naoya Kato
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

512 Background: Lenvatinib has been widely used as a leading oral multikinase inhibitor for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in real-world practice worldwide. However, in the global phase 3 study comparing the effectiveness of lenvatinib and sorafenib, only a limited population of patients were enrolled, excluding those who had a high-burden intrahepatic lesion or Child-Pugh class (C-P) B, who were likely to receive systemic therapy in the clinical practice. Currently, combination immunotherapy has replaced multikinase inhibitors as the standard first-line treatment. Therefore, this prospective study explored the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in the patient population, which would be used in real-world practice. Methods: This was an open-label, multicenter, prospective study that enrolled patients who had advanced HCC with C-P A or B, treated with lenvatinib as first-line or second-line after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atz + Bv) at 10 sites in Japan. The study included patients who had high tumor burden, defined as identifying either tumor volume of more than 50% of the liver, portal vein tumor thrombosis reaching the main trunk or the contralateral branch, or bile duct invasion at baseline (jRCTs031190017). Results: Between December 1, 2019, and September 30, 2021, 59 patients were recruited for this study. At the time of enrollment, 47 and 12 patients were classified as C-P A and B, respectively. This study included 11 patients with high tumor burden and 12 treated with second-line after Atz + Bv. All patients with high tumor burden and second-line treatment were classified as C-P A. Median overall survival of C-P A and B patients was 20.3 and 4.2 months, respectively. Similarly, progression-free survival according to modified RECIST (mRECIST) of C-P A and B patients was 4.8 and 2.8 months, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) according to mRECIST in C-P A patients was 61.9%, whereas in C-P B patients was 25.0%. ORRs of high-burden group and second-line group were 80.0% and 40.0%, respectively. Major severe adverse events (AE) (≥grade 3) in C-P A patients were hypertension (41.3%) and proteinuria (23.9%). In contrast, those in C-P B patients were hyponatremia (41.7%), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (41.7%), hypertension (33.3%), decreased appetite (16.7%), diarrhea (16.7%), and proteinuria (16.7%). Discontinuation rate due to AE of C-P A and B patients was 17.4% and 33.3%, respectively. In high-burden and second-line groups, 10% and 20% discontinued lenvatinib due to AE, respectively. Conclusions: Lenvatinib is expected to be safe and effective in patients with advanced HCC who have a high tumor burden and second-line treatment after Atz + Bv, whereas liver function was maintained with C-P A. However, in C-P B, this study found lower efficacy and higher discontinuation rates due to AE compared with C-P A. Clinical trial information: s031190017 .