tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors and association with recurrence-free survival in postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma (PREVENT): A prospective cohort study.
Authors: Le Li, Xiu-Mei Liang, Kang Chen, Guan-Lan Zhang, Shan Huang, Liang Ma, Jian-Hong Zhong
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

4119 Background: Adjuvant therapy may improve survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative resection, yet no such therapy is universally recommended. This study compared safety and efficacy outcomes between patients at high risk of recurrence who received different types of adjuvant therapy or no such therapy after hepatic resection for HCC. Methods: Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival, and adverse events were compared among patients who received adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone, ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), or no adjuvant therapy at our medical center between 13 March 2019 and 19 March 2022. In some analyses, patients who received adjuvant therapy were matched based on propensity scores to patients who did not, in order to reduce confounding due to baseline differences. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05221398). Results: Of the 492 patients in our final analysis, 410 (83.3%) received no adjuvant therapy, 50 (10.2%) received ICIs alone, and 32 (6.5%) received adjuvant ICIs and TKIs. During median follow-up of 23.3 months (IQR 15.6 to 31.1 months), HCC recurred in 221 (53.9%) of patients who received no adjuvant therapy, compared to 22 (44.0%) of patients who received ICIs and 18 (56.3%) of patients who received ICIs and TKIs. RFS was significantly longer among patients who received either type of adjuvant therapy (23.9 months, 95%CI 14.0-33.7) than among those who received none (16.8 months, 95%CI 13.2-20.3), and this difference remained significant after propensity score matching (HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.39-0.94, P = 0.033). However, overall survival was unaffected by either type of adjuvant therapy, even after propensity score matching. The rate of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar between the two types of adjuvant therapy. Conclusions: ICIs alone or with TKIs may improve RFS of patients at high risk of recurrence after curative resection. Clinical trial information: NCT05221398 .
Tissue-agnostic efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in advanced solid tumors with <i>HER2</i> amplification identified by plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing: Results from a phase 2 basket trial (HERALD/EPOC1806).
Authors: Hiroya Taniguchi, Masataka Yagisawa, Taroh Satoh, Shigenori Kadowaki, Yu Sunakawa, Tomohiro Nishina, Yoshito Komatsu, Taito Esaki, Daisuke Sakai, Ayako Doi, Takeshi Kajiwara, Hiromi Ono, Masatoshi Asano, Nami Hirano, Justin Iver Odegaard, Satoshi Fujii, Shogo Nomura, Akihiro Sato, Takayuki Yoshino, Yoshiaki Nakamura
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

3014 Background: HER2 ( ERBB2) gene amplification (amp) is a potential therapeutic target beyond breast and gastric cancers. HER2 amp can be detected in plasma cfDNA which may be an alternative to tissue biopsy. HERALD/EPOC1806 was a multicenter, investigator-initiated phase 2 trial of T-DXd for patients with HER2-amplified advanced solid tumors identified by cfDNA testing. Methods: We enrolled adults with advanced solid tumors harboring HER2 amp detected by next-generation sequencing of cfDNA (Guardant360) in the GOZILA study (UMIN000029315). We excluded breast or gastric cancer patients with HER2 overexpression (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH+). Patients received T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Results: From December 2019 to January 2022, 4,734 patients were screened by cfDNA in the GOZILA study. Among 252 with HER2 amp, 62 with 16 cancer types were enrolled in HERALD. Median baseline plasma HER2 copy number (CN) was 8.55 (range, 2.4–73.9). All patients but 3 (all with salivary gland cancer) received prior anti-cancer therapy (median, 3 lines; range, 0–8). At a median follow-up of 8.9 months (data cut-off: July 17, 2022), the confirmed ORR was 56.5% (95% CI, 43.3–69.0%), statistically higher than the threshold value of 5%. Responses were observed for 13 cancer types, including KRAS-mutant colorectal (1/3), PIK3CA-mutant endometrial (5/6), and tissue HER2-negative gastric cancers (1/2). Plasma HER2 CN above vs. below the baseline median value did not impact response (ORR: 58.1% vs. 54.8%); however, the clearance vs. persistence of HER2 amp in cfDNA on Cycle 2 Day 1 corresponded to higher response (ORR: 88.0% vs. 22.7%). ORR by independent review was 58.1% (95% CI, 44.8–70.5%), and the disease control rate was 90.3% (95% CI, 80.1–96.4%). Median progression-free survival was 7.0 (95% CI, 4.9–9.7) months, and the median duration of response was 8.8 months (95% CI, 5.8–11.2). Most adverse events were mild to moderate. Interstitial lung diseases occurred in 16 patients (25.8%, G1/G2/G3; 14/1/1). Conclusions: T-DXd achieved a high ORR, durable response with a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced solid tumors and HER2 amp detected in cfDNA. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-194707 .[Table: see text]
Results from the MORPHEUS-liver study: Phase Ib/II randomized evaluation of tiragolumab (tira) in combination with atezolizumab (atezo) and bevacizumab (bev) in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).
Authors: Richard S. Finn, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Chih-Hung Hsu, Daneng Li, Adam Burgoyne, Christopher Cotter, Shreya Badhrinarayanan, Yulei Wang, Anqi Yin, Tirupathi Rao Edubilli, Edward Gane
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

4010 Background: Atezo + bev is the current first-line standard of care for uHCC based on the IMbrave150 study, which demonstrated superior overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs sorafenib (Finn, et al. New Engl J Med 2020; Cheng, et al. J Hepatol 2022). TIGIT is a novel inhibitory immune checkpoint present on activated T cells and NK cells. Tira (anti-TIGIT) may synergize with other immunotherapies, such as PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors. The MORPHEUS platform comprises multiple phase Ib/II trials to identify early efficacy signals and safety of treatment combinations across cancers. Here we report data from a cohort of the MORPHEUS-liver study (NCT04524871) evaluating the combination of tira + atezo + bev vs a control arm (atezo + bev) in patients with uHCC. Methods: Patients with previously untreated uHCC were randomized to receive atezo (1200mg IV) + bev (15mg/kg IV) with or without tira (600mg IV) every three weeks. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR by RECIST V1.1. Secondary endpoints included PFS and safety. Results: A total of 58 patients were randomized (tira + atezo + bev, n=40; atezo + bev, n=18). As of 28 November 2022, median follow up was 14.0 months in the tira + atezo + bev arm and 11.8 months in the control arm. Confirmed ORR was higher in the tira + atezo + bev arm (42.5%) vs the control arm (11.1%). Median PFS was longer with tira + atezo + bev (11.1 months; 95% CI: 8.2–NE) vs control (4.2 months; 95% CI: 1.6–7.4), corresponding to a PFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.42 (95% CI: 0.22–0.82). A similar pattern of increased ORR and PFS was observed for the treatment arms in both PD-L1+ (n=23) and PD-L1– (n=27) subgroups. For tira + atezo + bev vs control arm, grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were 27.5% vs 33.3% and AEs leading to any treatment discontinuation were 22.5% vs 22.2%, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of tira to atezo + bev resulted in higher ORR and longer PFS compared with atezo + bev, and no new safety signals were identified. These data suggest that tira + atezo + bev may be a promising novel first-line treatment option for patients with uHCC, and support further study in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT04524871 . [Table: see text]
A phase 2 study of alrizomadlin, a novel MDM2/p53 inhibitor, in combination with pembrolizumab for treatment of patients with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST).
Authors: Neeta Somaiah, Brian Andrew Van Tine, Bartosz Chmielowski, Joseph J. Drabick, Sant P. Chawla, Meredith McKean, Alexander I. Spira, Kenneth John O'Byrne, Steven A. Foresto, Sujana Movva, AeRang Kim, Brian Gastman, Joseph Gerald Pressey, Ben Paudyal, Asit De, Robert E. Winkler, Mingyu Li, Mohammad Ahmad, Dajun Yang, Yifan Zhai
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

e14627 Background: MPNST is a rare and aggressive soft tissue malignancy accounting for 10% of all soft tissue sarcomas. This disease is characterized by high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis, and there is no current effective standard of care treatment option for patients with MPNST, with the only curative option of complete resection. Therefore, further treatment options are warranted. Investigational mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) inhibitor alrizomadlin restores TP53 function, activating p53-mediated apoptosis in tumor cells. Alrizomadlin also functions as a host immunomodulator and may restore antitumor activity in patients with MPNST that progressed on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Methods: This US/Australian multicenter trial evaluated alrizomadlin combined with PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with MPNST that progressed on available therapy or in those for whom therapy was unavailable. ECOG performance status was between 0-2 for eligible patients. Alrizomadlin 150 mg was administered orally every other day for 2 consecutive weeks, with 1 week off, and pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously for 30 minutes on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Results: As of December 12, 2022, preliminary clinical results are reported for 24 patients with MPNST, of whom 16 were male, with a median (range) age of 35 (14-73) years. Treatment (alrizomadlin or pembrolizumab)-related adverse events of any grade (&gt;10%) were reported in 18 patients. They included nausea (41.7%), vomiting and anemia (37.5% each), fatigue and diarrhea (33.3% each), thrombocytopenia (25.0%), and decreased leukocyte and lymphocyte counts (12.5% each). A total of 12.5% of patients reported treatment-related serious adverse events, including colitis, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and pericardial effusion. Among17 efficacy evaluable patients, the clinical benefit rate, as defined by the combination of overall response rate and stable disease for ≥ 4 cycles, was 53% per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v.1.1) and iRECIST. The median (range) treatment duration was 10 (4-20) cycles. Conclusions: Alrizomadlin combined with pembrolizumab is well tolerated and demonstrates meaningful clinical benefit in patients with MPNST for whom standard of care therapy is unavailable. Internal study identifiers: APG-115-US-002. Clinical trial information: NCT03611868 .
Neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and s-1 plus surgery and adjuvant s-1 for resectable advanced gastric cancer: Final survival outcomes of the randomized phase 3 PRODIGY trial.
Authors: Yoon-Koo Kang, Hyung-Don Kim, Jeong Hwan Yook, Young-Kyu Park, Young-Woo Kim, Jin Young Kim, Min-Hee Ryu, Sun Young Rha, Ik-Joo Chung, In-Ho Kim, Sang Cheul Oh, Chang Hak Yoo, Seok Yun Kang, Dae Young Zang, Sunju Kim, Sung Hoon Noh
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

4067 Background: The phase 3 PRODIGY study compared neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy followed by surgery followed by adjuvant S-1 with surgery followed by adjuvant S-1 for Korean patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) (Kang et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021). The planned analysis of the primary endpoint of PRODIGY showed that the addition of neoadjuvant DOS to surgery and adjuvant S-1 improved progression-free survival (PFS). We herein report the long-term follow-up outcomes, including overall survival (OS), from this trial. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed primary gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with clinical T2-3N+ or T4Nany disease were enrolled from 18 Korean study sites. Patients were randomly assigned to D2 surgery followed by adjuvant S-1 (40–60 mg orally twice a day, days 1–28 q6w for eight cycles; SC group) or neoadjuvant DOS (docetaxel 50 mg/m 2 , oxaliplatin 100 mg/m 2 intravenously day 1, S-1 40 mg/m 2 orally twice a day, days 1–14 q3w for three cycles) before D2 surgery, followed by adjuvant S-1 (CSC group). The primary endpoint was PFS. OS was the secondary endpoint. This analysis presents the final assessment of the outcomes after 5 years. Results: A total of 266 and 264 patients were randomly assigned to the CSC and SC arms, respectively, among which 238 and 246 patients were treated and included in the full analysis set. As of the data cut-off date (SEP-2022), the median follow-up duration of the surviving patients was 99.5 months (range, 68.6–127.7 months). As compared to SC, CSC significantly increased the OS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97; stratified log-rank P=0.028) with a 5-year OS rate of 66.8% and 63.0% for the CSC and SC arms, respectively. CSC also significantly improved the PFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.94; stratified log-rank P=0.019) with a 5-year PFS rate of 60.6% and 56.9% for the CSC and SC arms, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy, as part of perioperative chemotherapy, to surgery and adjuvant S-1 prolonged the OS and PFS of Asian patients with LAGC relative to patients treated with surgery and adjuvant S-1 alone. Neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy should be considered one of the standard treatment options for patients with LAGC in Asia. Clinical trial information: NCT01515748 .
Reporting and impact of subsequent cycle toxicities in oncology phase I clinical trials.
Authors: Avina Rami, Steven G. DuBois, Kevin M. Campbell
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

3149 Background: In recent years, the landscape of clinical trial development has evolved to include immunotherapy and targeted therapies, which have different lengths of administration and toxicity profiles compared to standard chemotherapy. As treatments have evolved, the classic assumptions of toxicity associated with cytotoxic agents may be less relevant, requiring new strategies for design of trials intended to inform dosing strategies for agents that may be administered beyond a set number of defined cycles. We aimed to describe the overall incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during and after cycle 1, the frequency of reporting subsequent cycle toxicities, and the impact of post-cycle 1 DLTs on conclusions drawn from oncology phase I clinical trials. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of subsequent cycle toxicities in oncology phase I clinical trials published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology from 2000 to 2020. Only trials that included more than one cycle of therapy were included. Data elements captured included: year of publication, study design, trial sponsor type, intervention type, number of anti-cancer therapies involved, primary diagnosis, incidence and type of cycle 1 DLT, incidence of dose modification in cycle 1, incidence and type of post-cycle 1 DLTs, incidence of dose modification in post-cycle 1, presence of a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and impact of subsequent cycle toxicity on RP2D. Results: From 2000 to 2020, we identified 489 full-text articles reporting on therapeutic phase I clinical trials. Of these, 421 (86%) reported data regarding cycle 1 DLTs and 170 (35%) reported cycle 1 dose modifications. The overall median cycle 1 DLT rate was 8.89%. Only 47 (9.6%) publications reported whether or not there were post-cycle 1 DLTs and only 92 (19%) reported whether or not there were dose modifications beyond cycle 1. The overall median post-cycle 1 DLT rate among trials that reported post-cycle 1 data was 14.8%. A RP2D was reported in 76% (371 of 489) trials. Among these 371 studies, 89% did not report whether post-cycle 1 toxicities impacted the RP2D. Independent predictors of reporting toxicity data beyond cycle 1 included year of publication, investigational agent type, novelty, disease type, trial size, and sponsor. Conclusions: Reporting of subsequent cycle DLTs and dose modification is uncommon in oncology phase I clinical trial publications. As newer oncology treatments trend towards longer duration of treatment, there will be an increased need to understand toxicities occurring post-cycle 1. Guidelines for reporting of phase I clinical trials should expand to include toxicity data beyond the first cycle.
Carboplatin and paclitaxel chemoradiation for localized anal cancer in patients not eligible for mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil.
Authors: Alyssa DeZeeuw, Patrick Thomas Grogan, Kayla Lemmon, Jenna Wilke, Anica Bausch, Jeremy D. Kratz, Noelle K. LoConte, Sam Joseph Lubner, Nataliya Volodymyrivna Uboha, Monica Arun Patel, Michael F. Bassetti, Dustin A. Deming
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

e15500 Background: Anal cancer (AC) is a relatively uncommon malignancy in the United States, however, this disease continues to increase in incidence, especially in individuals over 50 years old. Current standard of care for locoregional disease includes mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil (M/5FU) with radiation. This combination is associated with significant toxicity limiting its use in those patients who are elderly or have multiple comorbidities. Carboplatin and paclitaxel (C/P) is now the preferred standard of care treatment regimen for metastatic AC. Weekly C/P has become a standard of care option in combination with radiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Here we evaluate the efficacy of weekly C/P chemoradiation in treating a cohort of patients unable to receive standard M/5FU chemoradiation. Methods: Subjects were consented to an IRB approved AC registry at the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center. Patients (pts) were identified to have received weekly infusional C/P concurrent with standard-dose radiation for localized AC between January 1, 2016 and December 1, 2022. Clinical response was determined based on evidence of disease on imaging or anoscopy and toxicities were graded according to CTCAE v5. Results: 8 pts (7F/1M; median age 76 (54-87)) were found to meet eligibility criteria. 6 had perianal cancers and 2 had cancers within the anal canal. 6 had T2 disease and 2 had T3 tumors. 2 had node positive disease. Dosing ranged from C (AUC 1.5-2), P (30-50mg/m2) and radiation (50.4-58 Gy). Patients completed a median of 82.5% (40%-100%) of intended treatments. Most common toxicities included leukopenia, anemia, perianal pain, and fatigue. Grade 3 or higher toxicities included neutropenia (3) of which 2 resulted in febrile neutropenia, and anemia (3). All patients had a complete clinical response. With a median follow-up of 17 mos (3-40 mos), no patients have had recurrence and all patients are still alive. Conclusions: This study demonstrates promising tolerability and efficacy for weekly C/P chemoradiation for patients with anal cancer unable to receive M/5FU. This regimen merits further investigation in prospective clinical trials.
Immune checkpoint inhibition in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma at Mayo Clinic.
Authors: Robin John Lester Imperial, Mohammad Alomari, Mohamed Elawady, Jeremy Clifton Jones, Michelle DeLeon
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

e15626 Background: Studies have shown the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in patients with tumors demonstrating microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and an associated defect in DNA mismatch repair (dMMR). In particular, KEYNOTE-177 demonstrated significant survival benefit for patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer with MSI-H or dMMR. Recently published case reports and series have demonstrated similar outcomes for patients with locally advanced and resectable rectal cancer. We report on the experience of patients with locally advanced, resectable rectal adenocarcinoma treated across the Mayo Clinic Health System. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated at Mayo Clinic since 2015 A search of the Mayo Clinic database was done to include parameters for confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma, dMMR in pathology reports. Patients receiving ICI treatment including pembrolizumab, nivolumab/ipilimumab and durvalumab in any combination with chemotherapy and/or radiation were included. Patients with metastatic disease at the time of surgical intervention or ICI were excluded. Clinical data was assimilated. Results: Twenty-one patients met criteria for inclusion in our analysis. Fifteen patients had de novo disease. Six patients had local recurrence and had been treated previously with chemotherapy, radiation (RT) and surgery. None of the patients included had prior ICI therapy. Fifteen patients had Lynch syndrome. The median age of diagnosis was 41.5 years. Seven patients underwent surgical intervention. of the seven patients received surgery upfront followed by immunotherapy. The remaining six had neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiation. Prior to surgery, all patients demonstrated radiographic partial response (rPR). 67% of these demonstrated a pathologic complete response (pCR) while 33% had residual disease. The patient who received surgery upfront and adjuvant ICI continues to have radiographic stable disease after 1 year of treatment. For patients who did not have surgery, 50% had radiographic “complete or near complete” response (rCR), 43% had rPR and 7% had radiographic stable disease. Ten patients received RT and ICI with 70% demonstrating rCR and 30% rPR. Overall, the objective response rate was 90 Response to treatment was observed upwards of 75 months. Only 1 person in the study had progression of disease that occurred after 14 months of therapy. Conclusions: Similar to KEYNOTE-177, patients with locally advanced MSI-H/dMMR rectal cancer have significant and durable response to immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. Further large prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and determine a standardized approach.
PACE: A phase III trial of CAPOX versus anti-PD-1 inhibitor as adjuvant therapy for patients with dMMR/MSI-H stage III colon cancer.
Authors: Zhenlin Hou, Wu Jiang, Jinghua Tang, Binyi Xiao, Yuan Li, Dandan Li, Xiaoshi Zhang, Zhi-Zhong Pan, Peirong Ding
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

TPS3637 Background: Approximately 12% of stage III colon cancer are deficient mismatch repair (dMMR), leading to high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H). In the KEYNOTE-177 study, the anti–PD-1 inhibitor Pembrolizumab alone significantly improved progression free survival (PFS) versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with MSI-H/dMMR. We are conducting a phase III randomised trial to determine whether anti-PD-1 inhibitor Sintilimab monotherapy can improve disease free survival (DFS) compared with standard adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer patients with dMMR. Methods: This is an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase III study. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with completely resected, stage III colon cancer confirmed to have dMMR/MSI-H and ECOG performance status 0-1 are eligible. Approximately 323 patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to either Sintilimab monotherapy (200 mg IV every 3 weeks for 8 cycles) or CAPOX regimen (capecitabine, oxaliplatin for 4 or 8 cycles according to current standard practice). Adverse events (AEs) will be assessed throughout treatment and for 30 days thereafter (90 days for serious AEs) and graded per NCI CTCAE v4.0. Primary endpoint is 3-year DFS. The study was estimated to provide approximately 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.56 for DFS at a two-sided alpha of 0.05. Secondary endpoints include OS, safety profile, toxicity, and quality of life. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Study enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05236972 .