The differential response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal and endometrial cancer patients according to different mismatch repair alterations.
Authors: Moh'd M. Khushman, Michael Driscoll Toboni, Jia Zeng, Joanne Xiu, Upender Manne, Alex Farrell, Bassel F. El-Rayes, Emil Lou, Anthony Frank Shields, Philip Agop Philip, Mohamed E. Salem, Jim Abraham, David Spetzler, John Marshall, Priya Jayachandran, Michael J. Hall, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Wolfgang Michael Korn, Matthew A. Powell
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2022)

3625 Background: In colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) patients (pts), preliminary data suggest a differential response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) according to different MMR alterations. The drivers of this difference remain unknown and no reliable predictive biomarker has been found. We explored the genomic alterations, tumor mutation burden (TMB), immune-related gene expressions and signatures, tumor microenvironment (TME), neoantigen load and median overall survival (mOS) inCRC and EC pts treated with ICIs with different MMR alterations. Methods: 13,701 CRC and 3,315 EC specimens were tested at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) with Next Gen Sequencing (NGS) of DNA (592-gene or whole exome) and RNA (whole transcriptome). MMR/MSI status was determined by IHC of MMR protein and/or NGS. Immune cell abundance was quantified using quanTIseq. Gene expression profiles were analyzed for T cell-inflamed signature (TIS) and IFN-gamma scores. Immune epitope prediction was performed using the NetMHCpan v4.0 method in the Immune Epitope Database. Real-world mOS was obtained from insurance claims data and calculated from tissue collection or ICIs start to last contact. Statistical significance was determined using chi-square/Fisher-Exact and adjusted for multiple comparisons (adjusted p &lt; 0.05). Results: In CRC, 84 (0.6%) pts had intact expression of MLH1 and PMS2 and co-loss of MSH2 and MSH6 (MutS) and 648 (4.7%) had co-loss of MLH1 and PMS2 and intact MSH2 and MSH6 (MutL). 117 (0.9%) had other MMR IHC loss. APC, KRAS, ERBB2, ERBB3 and MSH2 mutations rates were higher in MutS while BRAF mutation rate was higher in MutL. B cell, NK cell content and neoantigen load (high affinity epitopes: p &lt; 0.05, intermediate: p &lt; 0.01, low: p &lt; 0.001) were higher in MutS. The mOS in MutS (N = 149) vs. MutL (N = 980) was 56 months (m) vs. 36 m (p = 0.003). In ICI-treated pts, the mOS in MutS (N = 28) vs. MutL (N = 149) was not reached (NR) vs. 32 m (p = 0.005). BRAF mutation didn’t impact survival in MutL. In EC, 48 (1.4%) pts had MutS and 915 (27.6%) had MutL. 81 (2.4%) had other MMR IHC loss. IHC-PD-L1, TMB, neoantigen load (high affinity epitopes: p &lt; 0.01, intermediate: p &lt; 0.0001, low: p &lt; 0.0001), TIS, IFN-gamma scores, immune related gene expressions, TME (Macrophage M1, CD8+) were higher in MutS. The mOS in MutS (N = 94) vs. MutL (N = 1804) was NR vs. 47 m (p &lt; 0.001). In ICI-treated pts, the mOS in MutS (N = 11) vs. MutL (N = 273) was NR vs. NR (p = 0.559). Conclusions: This is the largest study to explore differential response to ICIs in CRC and EC pts with different MMR alterations. In pts with CRC and EC, the mOS was longer in MutS compared to MutL. In ICI-treated pts, the mOS was longer in MutS compared to MutL in CRC but not in EC. Among the explored biomarkers, neoantigen load was higher in MutS compared to MutL in both CRC and EC and maybe the driving factor for differential response to ICIs.