OP0299-HPR ANALYSIS OF THE ACCEPTANCE AND USEFULNESS OF A NON-PRESENTIAL CONSULTATION, IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY JOINT DISEASES USING A DIGITAL PLATFORM
Authors: L. González, M. Fonseca Martinez, A. Aragon, M. C. Ortega de la O, M. Salido Olivares, V. Villaverde, E. M. Andres, P. Castro
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2022)

Background The Covid-19 pandemic has meant a modification of the patterns of the doctor-patient relationship, favoring online visits and reducing face-to-face visits. Likewise, the implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) that do not require the intervention of the doctor in our clinical practice and that given their close relationship with the clinical activity of chronic inflammatory joint diseases (CIJD) has favored an empowerment of patients and can allow the development of the online visit. Objectives Know the use and acceptance of patients with CIJD: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and spondyloarthropathies (SpA) of a non-face-to-face online visit, through a digital environment. Methods Patients were included in a platform called Rheumanet for access by username and passwords ( https://www.laconsultacercadeti.com/ ). At the time of inclusion, demographic variables were collected: date of birth, sex, level of education (primary education, secondary education, vocational training, further education and higher education), distance from the hospital to the patient’s home, and clinical variables such as diagnosis: RA, PsA or SpA, as well as the duration of the disease. Prior to the appointment, patients were encouraged to complete a PRO survey to assess their clinical situation: Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) for RA, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) for SpA and RAPID3 and / or BASDAI for the PsA. Both the RAPID3 and BASDAI were scored for the patient’s knowledge and assigned to a color scale based on disease activity in green (remission or low activity), orange (moderate activity) or red (severe activity). Likewise, they were ordered to express through a free text what they would tell us as if they were in a face-to-face consultation. Complementary tests (analytical, radiological studies and others) are obtained simultaneously from the medical records and a joint assessment of the visit is carried out. Results Between September 1, 2020 and January 31, 2022, a total of 248 patients (113 RA, 53 SpA and 82 PsA) were included in the platform. 172 (69.3%) patients used the digital platform and made at least one non-face-to-face visit during follow-up. The number of online visits made by each patient ranged from 1 to a maximum of 13 visits. 80 patients (70.7%) suffered from RA, 40 (75.4%) from SpA and 52 (63.4%) from PsA. The number of patients who made non-face-to-face visits was 38 (72.3%) for a disease duration of &lt;5 years and 137 (64.5%) for &gt;5 years. When the ages of the patients were analyzed, the number of patients who made visits was 75 (73.5%) between 18 and 30 years old, 50 (67.7%) between 30 and 50 and 47 (66.4 %) from 50 years. According to the degree of activity of the disease, 75 patients were in remission or low activity at some point during the visits, 63 patients with moderate activity and 34 with severe activity. The distribution according to level of education was: 11 (6.3%) primary education, 21 (12.2%) secondary education, 37 (21.5%) vocational training, 63 (36.6%) further education and 40 (23.2%)higher education. The number of online visits was higher in patients who lived at a distance of 50 km or more from the hospital, reaching 100% of the visits in this subgroup of patients. Conclusion The online visit through a digital platform through PROs is well accepted by our population with CIJD, especially in the young population, with a higher cultural level and whose home is far from the hospital. The online visit was made by patients regardless of the severity of their disease activity. Speed and ease of use using PROs already known to the patient and clinician is an important consideration for rheumatologists working in healthcare systems where patient contact time is limited. It would be interesting to obtain this information in non-pandemic situations such as COVID-19, which would make it possible to assess actual acceptance and its use in this type of patient in circumstances in which fear of contagion is not a variable to consider. Disclosure of Interests None declared