AB0766 Biologic Drug Preferences of Turkish Rheumatologists in Spondiloartropathy Patients with Advanced Chronic Renal Disease
Authors: R. Mercan, M. E. Tezcan, B. Yağiz, A. Ateş, O. Küçükşahin, N. S. Yasar Bilge, N. A. Kanitez, E. Gönüllü, S. Yilmaz, D. Ersözlü, D. Solmaz, T. Kaşifoğlu, B. N. Coşkun, S. S. Koca, E. Bilgin, V. Yazisiz, E. Dalkiliç, R. Yilmaz, G. Kimyon, G. Ayan, A. Erden, C. Bes, H. Emmungil, Y. Pehlivan, A. İ. Ertenli, S. Kiraz, U. Kalyoncu
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2022)

Background Biological therapies are the main treatment options for patients with active spondyloarthropathy (SpA) who do not respond to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or conventional synthetic disease-modifying drugs. Kidney diseases are not a contraindication to biologic therapies. However, there are some safety concerns for these drugs for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. De novo infection or recurrence of infections are the main challenges in patients with multiple comorbidities during biologic treatments. Neverthless, physicans should initiate these treatments in active and resistant diseases. Objectives Here, we evaluated which biologic therapies clinicians’ first option to initiate in SpA patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CRD). Methods Total 140 patients of TREASURE database who fullfield axial and/or peripheral ASAS SpA criteria with glomerular filtration rate &lt; 60 ml/dk (stage 3,4 or 5 CRD according to The National Kidney Foundation classification) were included to the study. Renal stages of the patients were evaluated when biologic therapy was initiated. Five anti-TNF (adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab) and an interleukin-17A blocker (secukinumab) were on the market during the study. We evaluated physicans’ first choice for biologic therapy for patients with stage 3,4 and 5 CRD respectively. Results More than two thirds of the patients had stage 3 CRD. Anti-TNF drugs were the first choice of biologic treatment in the patients with advanced CRD. Etanercept was started at most to the patients in general, in stage 3 and in stage 5 CRD groups. However, adalimumab was the first choise in stage 4 CRD. Both etanercept and adalimumab were the first drug of choise in three fourth of the stage 4 and stage 5 patients. All two patients on Il-17A blocker had stage 3 CRD (Table 1). Table 1. Drug of choise in the SpA patients with advanced chronic renal diseases N Total n (%) N Stage 3 n (%) N Stage 4 n (%) N Stage 5 n (%) Adalimumab 140 44 (31.4) 108 30 (27.8) 20 9 (45.0) 12 5 (41.6) Etanersept 52 (37.1) 41 (38.0) 5 (25.0) 6 (50.0) Golimumab 9 (6.0) 7 (6.5) 2 (10.0) 0 (0) Infliksimab 28 (20.0) 23 (21.3) 4 (20.0) 1 (8.4) Secukinumab 3 (2.1) 3 (2.8) 0 (0) 0 (0) Sertolizumab 4 (2.8) 4 (3.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) Conclusion We show that rheumatologists in the TREASURE group prefer to initiate anti-TNF drugs first in all advanced CRD stages. Etanercept was the first choice in these patients. References [1]Sieper J, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68 Suppl 2:ii1-44. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.104018. PMID: 19433414. [2]Antoni C, Braun J. Side effects of anti-TNF therapy: current knowledge. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002 Nov-Dec;20(6 Suppl 28):S152-7. PMID: 12463468. [3]Kalyoncu U, et al. Methodology of a new inflammatory arthritis registry: TReasure. Turk J Med Sci. 2018 Aug 16;48(4):856-861. doi: 10.3906/sag-1807-200. PMID: 30119164. Disclosure of Interests None declared