P555: OLUTASIDENIB IN POST-VENETOCLAX PATIENTS WITH MUTANT IDH1 AML
Authors: Jorge Cortes, Justin M. Watts, Gary Schiller, Leslie Todd, Aaron Sheppard, Brian A. Jonas
Journal: HemaSphere (2023)

Background: Olutasidenib is a potent, selective, oral inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1). Olutasidenib is FDA approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) based on the registrational cohort (n=153) of the Phase 2 trial, which demonstrated a rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) of 35%, with a duration of response of 25.9 months. Venetoclax (VEN) in combination with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) is standard treatment for AML patients unfit for chemotherapy and has adequate efficacy in IDH1-mutated AML. The sequence of therapy following failure of a VEN-based regimen in IDH1-mutated AML has not been established. Aims: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of olutasidenib in a subset of 17 patients from the Phase 2 trial previously treated with VEN combination regimens. Methods: Adults with mIDH1 R/R AML received olutasidenib 150 mg twice daily alone (n=15) or in combination with azacitadine (AZA) (n=2). The primary endpoint was achievement of a CR/CRh. Secondary endpoints included time to and duration of CR+CRh and rate of transfusion independence (TI). Data cut-off for the analysis was 18 June 2021. Results: Of 17 patients with prior VEN treatment, 5 are ongoing and 12 discontinued due to progressive disease (6), adverse events (4), or withdrawal by subject (2). Median age was 73 (range 65-83). Median time since diagnosis was 19.5 months (1.2-41). Cytogenetic risk class was intermediate in 9, poor in 6, favorable in 1 and unknown in 1. Most patients had relapsed; 6 were refractory to prior treatment. The median number of prior regimens was 2 (range 1-6); 13 had prior HMA, 2 had prior olutasidenib. VEN was generally used for induction. Some patients received VEN in multiple regimens. VEN was used with azacytidine (AZA) in 8 patients, after AZA (1), and with decitabine (5), cytarabine +/- idarubicin (5), and dinaciclib (2). The best response to olutasidenib was CR/CRh in 5/17 (29.4%), of which 4 (23.5%) were CR. In the 8 patients who previously received the combination of VEN-AZA, 3 (37.5%) patients achieved a CR/CRh. Time to CR/CRh was median 2.1 months (actual: 1, 1.9, 2.1, 2.8 and 2.8). Duration of CR/CRh was median 18.5+ months (4.8, 9.0+, 18.5+, 22.6+, and 28.5+ months as of cut-off date). Other responses included CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) in 2 patients, stable disease (SD) in 2, progressive disease (PD) in 3, not done (ND) in 2, not evaluable (NE) in 1 and not listed in 2. At baseline 14/17 were red blood cell (RBC) dependent, and 4 of the 14 (28%) had a 56-day period of RBC transfusion independence (TI). Ten were platelet dependent at baseline and 5 of the 10 (50%) had a 56-day period of platelet TI while receiving olutasidenib. Summary/Conclusion: Olutasidenib induced durable remissions in patients with mIDH1 R/R AML, including those failing prior treatment with a venetoclax-based regimen. Keywords: relapsed/refractory, Acute myeloid leukemia, Phase II