tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Management of Adult Patients With Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms
Authors: Marie-Charlotte Brüggen, Sarah Walsh, M. Milad Ameri, Natalie Anasiewicz, Emanual Maverakis, Lars E. French, Saskia Ingen-Housz-Oro, Richiiro Abe, Michael Ardern-Jones, Haudrey Assier, Annick Barbaud, Benoit Bensaid, William Bernal, Claire Bernier, Alain Brassard, Eva Březinová, Rosario Cabañas, Adela Cardones, Chia-Yu Chu, Ser-Ling Chua, Vincent Descamps, Biagio Didona, Sherrie Jill Divito, Roni Dodiuk-Gad, Scott Elman, Krisztian Gaspar, Charlotte G. Mortz, Natsumi Hama, Haur Yueh Lee, Barbara Horváth, Lukas Jörg, Benjamin H. Kaffenberger, Vesta Kucinskiene, Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes, Rannakoe J. Lehloenya, Damian Meyersburg, Robert Micheletti, Brigitte Milpied, Fumi Miyagawa, Arash Mostaghimi, Mirjam Nägeli, Luigi Naldi, Eva Oppel, Elizabeth J. Phillips, Tasneem Pirani, Annamari Ranki, Tarja Mälkönen, Misha Rosenbach, Carmen Salavastru, Delphine Staumont-Salle, Heidi Sandberg, Jane Setterfield, Kanade Shinkai, Tetsuo Shiohara, Angele Soria, Danielle Tartar, George-Sorin Tiplica, Stephan Traidl, Artem Vorobyev, Camilla von Wachter, Scott Worswick, Yung-Tsu Cho
Journal: JAMA Dermatology (2023)

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare but potentially fatal drug hypersensitivity reaction. To our knowledge, there is no international consensus on its severity assessment and treatment.
Perceptions of US-Based Muslim Patients of Their Dermatology Care
Authors: Ghida El-Banna, Shawheen Justin Rezaei, Michelle Chang, Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell, Elizabeth E. Bailey, Nour Kibbi
Journal: JAMA Dermatology (2023)

Importance Cultural humility training is of growing interest, yet the religious and cultural accommodations of Muslim patients in dermatology have not been studied. Objective To explore the perceptions of Muslim patients of their dermatology care. Design, Setting, and Participants This qualitative mixed-methods study, consisting of surveys and semistructured interviews, recruited participants from 2 clinical sites within a large academic health care system in California. Participants were adult, English-speaking, Muslim patients who were evaluated at least once by a medical or surgical dermatologist between January 2022 and January 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures A survey obtained the following data: demographics, religious practices pertinent to dermatology care, and experiences of bias outside and inside the dermatology clinic. Semistructured interviews covered topics related to positive and negative experiences in the dermatology clinic, accommodation of cultural and religious needs in dermatology, and future interventions. Results A total of 21 patients (mean [SD] age, 36.4 [11.6] years; range, 26-71 years) participated in the study: 5 male individuals (24%) and 16 female individuals (76%), including 10 female individuals who wore hijab. Eleven participants identified as Middle Eastern (52%), 8 as South Asian (38%), 1 as North African (5%), and 1 as Pacific Islander (5%). Survey results showed variations in the impact of Islamic practices on dermatology care. Interviews showed that Muslim participants did not perceive dermatology care as a priority and expressed interest in community events focused on general dermatology education. They also experienced stigmatization of their skin disease and cosmetic care. Prior experiences with Islamophobia and colorism hindered the Muslim patient–dermatologist relationship and disclosure of the need for accommodations. There were instances when participants experienced bias and poor cultural humility from dermatologists. Finally, Muslim participants had unique religious and cultural needs pertinent to their care, including clinician gender concordance, medication timing adjustment while fasting, and halal medication ingredients. Conclusions and Relevance This qualitative mixed-methods study explored the experiences of Muslim patients in dermatology in the US. Recommendations supported by this study include incorporating religion into cultural humility training, increasing diversity in the dermatology workforce, implementing policies for clearer medication labeling, supporting dermatology research in subpopulations of Muslim individuals in the US, and partnering with community organizations for dermatology education.
Mystery Shopper Study of State Medicaid Coverage for Out-of-State Abortion Care
Authors: Hazar Khidir, Carlisle Topping, Vanessa K. Dalton, Stacy Tessler Lindau, Arjun K. Venkatesh
Journal: JAMA Network Open (2023)

This cross-sectional study uses a mystery shopper survey to examine variation in state Medicaid agency responses to coverage questions on out-of-state abortion care.
Second Primary Lung Cancer Among Lung Cancer Survivors Who Never Smoked
Authors: Eunji Choi, Chloe C. Su, Julie T. Wu, Jacqueline V. Aredo, Joel W. Neal, Ann N. Leung, Leah M. Backhus, Natalie S. Lui, Loïc Le Marchand, Daniel O. Stram, Su-Ying Liang, Iona Cheng, Heather A. Wakelee, Summer S. Han
Journal: JAMA Network Open (2023)

Importance Lung cancer among never-smokers accounts for 25% of all lung cancers in the US; recent therapeutic advances have improved survival among patients with initial primary lung cancer (IPLC), who are now at high risk of developing second primary lung cancer (SPLC). As smoking rates continue to decline in the US, it is critical to examine more closely the epidemiology of lung cancer among patients who never smoked, including their risk for SPLC. Objective To estimate and compare the cumulative SPLC incidence among lung cancer survivors who have never smoked vs those who have ever smoked. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based prospective cohort study used data from the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC), which enrolled participants between April 18, 1993, and December 31, 1996, with follow-up through July 1, 2017. Eligible individuals for this study were aged 45 to 75 years and had complete smoking data at baseline. These participants were followed up for IPLC and further SPLC development through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. The data were analyzed from July 1, 2022, to January 31, 2023. Exposures Never-smoking vs ever-smoking exposure at MEC enrollment. Main Outcomes and Measures The study had 2 primary outcomes: (1) 10-year cumulative incidence of IPLC in the entire study cohort and 10-year cumulative incidence of SPLC among patients with IPLC and (2) standardized incidence ratio (SIR) (calculated as the SPLC incidence divided by the IPLC incidence) by smoking history. Results Among 211 414 MEC participants, 7161 (3.96%) developed IPLC over 4 038 007 person-years, and 163 (2.28%) developed SPLC over 16 470 person-years. Of the participants with IPLC, the mean (SD) age at cohort enrollment was 63.6 (7.7) years, 4031 (56.3%) were male, and 3131 (43.7%) were female. The 10-year cumulative IPLC incidence was 2.40% (95% CI, 2.31%-2.49%) among ever-smokers, which was 7 times higher than never-smokers (0.34%; 95% CI, 0.30%-0.37%). However, the 10-year cumulative SPLC incidence following IPLC was as high among never-smokers (2.84%; 95% CI, 1.50%-4.18%) as ever-smokers (2.72%; 95% CI, 2.24%-3.20%), which led to a substantially higher SIR for never-smokers (14.50; 95% CI, 8.73-22.65) vs ever-smokers (3.50; 95% CI, 2.95-4.12). Conclusions and Relevance The findings indicate that SPLC risk among lung cancer survivors who never smoked is as high as among those with IPLC who ever-smoked, highlighting the need to identify risk factors for SPLC among patients who never smoked and to develop a targeted surveillance strategy.
Effect of Tafamidis on Cardiac Function in Patients With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy
Authors: Sanjiv J. Shah, Nowell Fine, Pablo Garcia-Pavia, Allan L. Klein, Fabio Fernandes, Neil J. Weissman, Mathew S. Maurer, Kurt Boman, Balarama Gundapaneni, Marla B. Sultan, Perry Elliott
Journal: JAMA Cardiology (2023)

Tafamidis has been shown to improve survival in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) compared with placebo. However, its effect on cardiac function has not been fully characterized.
Concerns Regarding Strength of Conclusions in Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Neuroradiological Abnormalities in First-Episode Psychosis
Authors: Benjamin Dralle, Robert J. Morgan
Journal: JAMA Psychiatry (2023)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA Psychiatry HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcast Journals JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2024 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA Psychiatry journal
Resection Details, Donor Segment Volume, and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Liver Transplant
Authors: Peng Chen, Xiaoping Wei
Journal: JAMA Surgery (2023)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA Surgery HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcast Journals JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2024 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA Surgery journal
Expiration of State Licensure Waivers and Out-of-State Telemedicine Relationships
Authors: Eric Bressman, Rachel M. Werner, Daniel Cullen, Benjamin Ukert, Benjamin A. Barsky, Jennifer L. Kowalski, Ateev Mehrotra
Journal: JAMA Network Open (2023)

This cross-sectional study compares the use of telemedicine in states where COVID-19 pandemic–related licensure waivers expired vs states where waivers continued.
Concerns Regarding Strength of Conclusions in Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Neuroradiological Abnormalities in First-Episode Psychosis
Authors: Malcolm Forbes, Stephen Stuckey, Steve Kisely
Journal: JAMA Psychiatry (2023)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA Psychiatry HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcast Journals JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2024 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA Psychiatry journal
Completion of Recommended Tests and Referrals in Telehealth vs In-Person Visits
Authors: Anthony Zhong, Maelys J. Amat, Timothy S. Anderson, Umber Shafiq, Scot B. Sternberg, Talya Salant, Leonor Fernandez, Gordon D. Schiff, Mark D. Aronson, James C. Benneyan, Sara J. Singer, Russell S. Phillips
Journal: JAMA Network Open (2023)

Importance Use of telehealth has increased substantially in recent years. However, little is known about whether the likelihood of completing recommended tests and specialty referrals—termed diagnostic loop closure —is associated with visit modality. Objectives To examine the prevalence of diagnostic loop closure for tests and referrals ordered at telehealth visits vs in-person visits and identify associated factors. Design, Setting, and Participants In a retrospective cohort study, all patient visits from March 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021, at 1 large urban hospital-based primary care practice and 1 affiliated community health center in Boston, Massachusetts, were evaluated. Main Measures Prevalence of diagnostic loop closure for (1) colonoscopy referrals (screening and diagnostic), (2) dermatology referrals for suspicious skin lesions, and (3) cardiac stress tests. Results The study included test and referral orders for 4133 patients (mean [SD] age, 59.3 [11.7] years; 2163 [52.3%] women; 203 [4.9%] Asian, 1146 [27.7%] Black, 2362 [57.1%] White, and 422 [10.2%] unknown or other race). A total of 1151 of the 4133 orders (27.8%) were placed during a telehealth visit. Of the telehealth orders, 42.6% were completed within the designated time frame vs 58.4% of those ordered during in-person visits and 57.4% of those ordered without a visit. In an adjusted analysis, patients with telehealth visits were less likely to close the loop for all test types compared with those with in-person visits (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.47-0.64). Conclusions The findings of this study suggest that rates of loop closure were low for all test types across all visit modalities but worse for telehealth. Failure to close diagnostic loops presents a patient safety challenge in primary care that may be of particular concern during telehealth encounters.
New CDC Campaign Targets Health Care Worker Burnout
Authors: Emily Harris
Journal: JAMA (2023)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Journals JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2024 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
The Role of Socioeconomic Position in the Association Between Mental Disorders and Mortality
Authors: Danni Chen, Linda Ejlskov, Lisbeth Mølgaard Laustsen, Nanna Weye, Christine Leonhard Birk Sørensen, Natalie C. Momen, Julie Werenberg Dreier, Yan Zheng, Astrid Jensen Damgaard, John J. McGrath, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Oleguer Plana-Ripoll
Journal: JAMA Psychiatry (2023)

Studies are lacking summarizing how the association between mental disorders and mortality varies by socioeconomic position (SEP), particularly considering different aspects of SEP, specific types of mental disorders, and causes of death.
Irregular Rhythm in a Middle-Aged Man Presenting With New-Onset Heart Failure
Authors: Hussam Ali, Ilaria Passarelli, Riccardo Cappato
Journal: JAMA Cardiology (2023)

A man in his 50s with recurrent palpitations, fatigue, and progressive exertion dyspnea had irregular narrow-QRS tachycardia in an incessant, repetitive fashion with heart rates up to 180 beats per minute and occasional short runs of wide-QRS tachycardia on Holter monitoring and 12-lead electrocardiogram. What would you do next?
Weekly Basal Insulin May Be Equally Effective for Type 1 Diabetes
Authors: Emily Harris
Journal: JAMA (2023)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Journals JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2024 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Operative vs Nonoperative Management of Acute Cholecystitis During the Different Trimesters of Pregnancy
Authors: Mariam N. Hantouli, David J. Droullard, Michael G. Nash, Lyndsey S. Benson, Andrew S. Wright, David R. Flum, Giana H. Davidson
Journal: JAMA Surgery (2023)

Acute cholecystitis (AC) management during pregnancy requires balancing the risk of pregnancy loss or preterm delivery (adverse pregnancy outcomes [APOs]) with or without surgery. Guidelines recommend cholecystectomy across trimesters; however, trimester-specific evidence on the risks of AC and its management is lacking.
Concurrent Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Without Clonal Relationship
Authors: Sebastian Beckmann, Mike Kliffen, Auke Huijben, Hendrikus Jan Dubbink, Yorick Sandberg
Journal: JAMA Dermatology (2023)

This case report describes a woman in her 30s who had been treated with chemotherapy and presented with Langerhans cell histiocytosis and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Concerns Regarding Strength of Conclusions in Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Neuroradiological Abnormalities in First-Episode Psychosis
Authors: Anil N. Makam
Journal: JAMA Psychiatry (2023)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA Psychiatry HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcast Journals JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2024 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA Psychiatry journal
Ascertainment of Minimal Clinically Important Differences in the Diabetes Distress Scale–17
Authors: Jack Banks, Amber B. Amspoker, Elizabeth M. Vaughan, LeChauncy Woodard, Aanand D. Naik
Journal: JAMA Network Open (2023)

Importance The Diabetes Distress Scale–17 (DDS-17) is a common measure of diabetes distress. Despite its popularity, there are no agreed-on minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values for the DDS-17. Objective To establish a distribution-based metric for MCID in the DDS-17 and its 4 subscale scores (interpersonal distress, physician distress, regimen distress, and emotional distress). Design, Setting, and Participants This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial used baseline and postintervention data from a hybrid (implementation-effectiveness) trial evaluating Empowering Patients in Chronic Care (EPICC) vs an enhanced form of usual care (EUC). Participants included adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin A 1c [HbA 1c ] level &amp;amp;gt;8.0%) who received primary care during the prior year in participating Department of Veterans Affairs clinics across Illinois, Indiana, and Texas. Data collection was completed in November 2018, and data analysis was completed in June 2023. Interventions Participants in EPICC attended 6 group sessions led by health care professionals based on collaborative goal-setting theory. EUC included diabetes education. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was distribution-based MCID values for the total DDS-17 and 4 DDS-17 subscales, calculated using the standard error of measurement. Baseline to postintervention changes in DDS-17 and its 4 subscale scores were grouped into 3 categories: improved, no change, and worsened. Multilevel logistic and linear regression models examined associations between treatment group and MCID change categories and whether improvement in HbA 1c varied in association with MCID category. Results A total of 248 individuals with complete DDS-17 data were included (mean [SD] age, 67.4 [8.3] years; 235 [94.76%] men), with 123 participants in the EPICC group and 125 participants in the EUC group. The MCID value for DDS-17 was 0.25 and MCID values for the 4 distress subscales were 0.38 for emotional and interpersonal distress and 0.39 for physician and regimen distress. Compared with EUC, more EPICC participants were in the MCID improvement category on DDS-17 (63 participants [51.22%] vs 40 participants [32.00%]; P = .003) and fewer EPICC participants were in the worsened category (20 participants [16.26%] vs 39 participants [31.20%]; P = .008). There was no direct association of DDS-17 MCID improvement (β = −0.25; 95% CI, −0.59 to 0.10; P = .17) or worsening (β = 0.18; 95% CI, −0.22 to 0.59; P = .38) with HbA 1c levels among all participants. Conclusions and Relevance In this secondary analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial, an MCID improvement or worsening of more than 0.25 on the DDS-17 was quantitatively significant and patients in the EPICC group were more likely to experience improvement than those in the EUC group. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01876485