P748: SINGLE CELL GENOTYPING OF MATCHED BONE MARROW AND PERIPHERAL BLOOD CELLS IN TREATMENT NAIVE AND AZA-TREATED MDS AND CMML
Authors: A. Schnegg-Kaufmann, J. Thoms, G. S. Bhuyan, H. Henry, L. Vaughan, K. Rutherford, P. Kakadia, E. Johansson, T. Failes, A. Greg, J. Koval, R. Lindeman, P. Warburton, A. Rodriguez-Meira, A. Mead, A. Unnikrishnan, S. Bohlander, E. Pappaemmanuil, O. Faridani, C. Jolly, F. Zanini, J. Pimanda
Journal: HemaSphere (2022)

Background: Somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are a central pathogenic event in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) where they induce proliferative advantages and impaired differentiation with subsequent cytopenias in peripheral blood (PB). Patients with high-risk disease who are ineligible for allogenic stem cell transplantation are treated with hypomethylating agents, including 5-azacytidine (AZA). AZA treatment can improve PB counts and delay progression to Akute Myeloid Leukemia. However, AZA response does not require eradication of mutated HSCs and may be related to improved differentiation capacity of mutated hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). However, the contribution of mutated HSPCs to steadystate hematopoiesis in MDS and CMML is unclear. Aims: In this project, we aimed to determine the distribution of individual subclones and even wild-type cells within the HSPC-compartment and the contribution of these subclones and wild-type cells to effective hematopoiesis in patients with MDS or CMML. Methods: We used a combination of index sorting and single cell genotyping to characterize the somatic mutations of individual stem- and progenitor cells and matched high-turnover circulating cells in three patients, one treatment naïve and two AZA-treated. Using this approach, myeloid driver mutations previously detected in a traditional approach were tracked in HSC/multipotent progenitors (MPP), MDS stem cells MDS-SC, progenitor cells (common myeloid progenitor (CMP), granulocyte monocyte progenitor (GMP), megakaryocyte erythroid progenitor (MEP)), as well as in monocytes, neutrophils and naïve B cells (nBC). Results: Patient H198302 and Patient H198303 both had CMML and had been treated with AZA for ̴10 years with complete response. Patient H198304 had MDS-EB1 and has never been treated with hypomethylating agents. For each patient, the figure shows the proportions of cells across the haematopoietic hierarchy carrying zero, one, two, three, or four mutations in the specified alleles. Only very small numbers of HSPCs carrying no mutation could be detected. In all three patients, most stem and progenitor cells carried a majority of tracked mutations, with no major differences between stem cells, progenitor cells and MDS-stem cells. In one patient, H198304, MDS-stem cells had a higher proportion of cells with 3 or 4 mutations detected. Overall, in all three patients, a similar frequency of mutations was observed in differentiated monocytes and neutrophils with a substantial proportion of the circulating cells derived from highly mutated progenitors. One notable exception were nBCs in Patient H198304, which were mostly wild-type, suggesting that the small wildtype HSC population is the predominant origin of nBCs in this individual. Analysis of additional lymphoid populations in PB from this patient revealed that naïve T, but not NK cells were also predominantly wild-type, suggesting specific impairment of B- and T-lineage maturation in the mutated cells. Image:Summary/Conclusion: In conclusion, attrition of highly mutated cells during myeloid maturation was not observed in any of the three patients, irrespective of HMA therapy. This suggests that in vivo, highly mutated stem and progenitor cells retain the capacity to differentiate to mature myeloid and in some patients mature lymphoid cells and contribute significantly to circulating blood cells in MDS and CMML, prior to and following AZA treatment.