tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Editorial Board
Authors: Donald Leung, Colo Deputy, Harold Nelson, Stanley Szefler, Colo Associate, Andrea Apter, Bruce Philadelphia, Baltimore Bochner, Robert Bush, Fred Finkelman, William Shearer, David Peden, Scott Sicherer, New York, Donata Vercelli, Ariz Guest, Burton Zweiman, Marc Rothenberg
Journal: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (2005)
COVER STORY
Journal: JAMA (1973)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Nation will receive AIDS brochure in 'largest government mailing ever'
Authors: C. A. Raymond
Journal: JAMA (1988)

BEGINNING LATE THIS MONTH, postal carriers will have nestled in their pouches another government document on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). They will be delivering an eight-page brochure to each of 108 million households in the United States, making this the largest ever public health education effort and "the largest government mailing ever," according to Robert E. Windom, MD, Assistant Secretary for Health in the Department of Health and Human Services. The pamphlet is written in a question-and-answer format, targeted for a seventh-grade reading level. Questions will include "Should You Get an AIDS Test?" "What Does a Person With AIDS Look Like?" and "Is There a Cure?" There also is information about how to care for a person with AIDS and a quiz to determine the reader's understanding of the material. Readers are referred to their physician in several places in the document. Those persons wishing more information are advised to
Identification of Chlorite and Serpentine in Cosmetic or Pharmaceutical Talc
Authors: A. M. Blount, Andreas H. Vassiliou
Journal: Environmental Health Perspectives (1983)

Chlorite is the most common accessory mineral group found in high purity talc ore used in cosmetic or pharmaceutical consumer talcum products. X-ray diffraction and wet chemical analytical data obtained on geologic samples representing commercial talc ore deposits of high purity and on processed samples representing talc found in consumer talcum products indicate that clinochlore and penninite are the two chlorite minerals most commonly found in all talc samples irrespective of origin or source, but sheridanite is also found in some samples representing talc deposits that are associated with serpentinite rocks. The chlorite minerals exhibit certain well-defined X-ray diffraction characteristics which differentiate them from each other as well as from those of serpentine minerals, including the hazardous chrysotile asbestos.
A Study of Orthoglycaemic Glycosuria with Particular Reference to Its Hereditability.
Journal: JAMA (1928)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Embarrassing Errata
Journal: JAMA (1971)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Gallstone size and the risk of gallbladder cancer
Authors: A. K. Diehl
Journal: JAMA (1983)

Gallstones are a major risk factor for gallbladder cancer, but few persons with stones experience development of tumors. To examine this relationship, a case-control study was performed. Each of 81 cancer cases was matched for age, sex, hospital, and admission date with two controls, one with benign gallbladder disease and one with a nongallbladder diagnosis. Persons with large gallstones were found to be at increased risk for cancer. For those with stone diameters of 2.0 to 2.9 cm, the odds ratio (<i>v</i>stone size &lt;1 cm) was 2.4; for stones 3 cm or larger, the ratio was 10.1. This association of large gallstones with cancer was not hypothesized before data analysis and should be replicated in other settings before being accepted. If confirmed, however, this finding might have implications for the management of silent gallstones. (<i>JAMA</i>1983;250:2323-2326)
Two different dosages of cefotaxime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: Results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study
Authors: A RIMOLA
Journal: Hepatology (1995)

Cefotaxime (CTX) is considered one of the first-choice antibiotics in the therapy of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in cirrhosis. Because CTX is largely metabolized in the liver, this drug may also be effective in SBP by administering lower doses than those habitually used. To investigate this possibility, a prospective, randomized, multicenter study was performed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of two different dosages of CTX in 143 patients with SBP: 71 (group I) were allocated to receive a high dose (2 g every 6 hours, which is one of the most frequently recommended doses in this infection), and 72 (group II) were allocated to receive a low dose (2 g every 12 hours). At inclusion, both groups were similar in relation to clinical and laboratory data, with the exception of a higher incidence of positive ascitic fluid culture in group I than in group H (59% vs. 40%; P = .029). The rate of infection resolution was similar for both groups (77% vs. 79%). Hospital survival was also similar in both groups (69% vs. 79%). No difference was observed between patients with positive or negative ascitic fluid cultures with regard to infection resolution and patient survival. The duration of antibiotic therapy was similar in both groups (9.0 ± 3.3 days in group I vs. 8.8 ± 3.1 days in group II). In a subset of 13 patients from group I and 11 patients from group II CTX levels were determined in serum (peak and trough) and ascitic fluid (concomitantly with trough serum). Peak serum levels were similar in patients from both groups. In contrast, trough serum and/or ascitic fluid levels were significantly lower or more frequently undetectable in group II patients than in group I patients. Nevertheless, this feature did not correlate with infection resolution or patient survival. These results indicate that the High efficacy of CTX in SBP can be maintained by using doses lower than those habitually recommended.
Reversing vasectomy.
Authors: D. J. Cahill, S. Harris, P. G. Wardle, W. C. Ford, C. Coulson, M. G. Hull
Journal: BMJ (1992)

On admission hewas semiconscious and scored 9 on the Glasgow coma score.He showed writhing movements of his hands and subsequently had a short tonic-clonic fit.Both his plantar responses were extensor, but the remainder of the physical examination gave normal results.Initial investiga- tions showed a serum sodium concentration of 121 mmol/l, potassium 3 9 mmol/l, and chloride 90 mmol/l with a creatinine concentration of 54 [tmol/l and osmolarity of 254 mmol/l.A com-
Cancer, New York
Journal: JAMA (1966)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Cooking Fuel Smoke and Respiratory Symptoms among Women in Low-Income Areas in Maputo
Authors: Anders Ellegard
Journal: Environmental Health Perspectives (1996)

Thie assciation between :tposure to air poilution from cooking foals an4 health.aswas studied in Ma a1200 radol s e w e rsidiing n. the suburbs of Maputo iwere l an 218 were monitored fotr Aipl:lution.The fuels .mostcommonly used woo a e t and liquified peleum (LPG).Wood users were esposed to significantlydhigher levels of particulate pollution-durngcooking time (1200 pg/m3) than ch'acoal usrn '(54 j and users of modern fuels (LPG and electricity) (200-380 pg/m3) Wood' user wet*:fid to have si c more cough pms thn 6 r m This assecioaaon eiuinr of awel-.. .. roumental varisbles.There w.diffiurn in cough Z -.users and
THE DECENNIAL REPORT ON THE VITAL STATISTICS OF THE REGISTRAR-GENERAL'S OFFICE OF ENGLAND.
Journal: JAMA (1897)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
The Veterans Administration and health manpower
Authors: H. M. Engle
Journal: JAMA (1968)

For the past two decades the Veterans Administration has provided training in its hospitals in a wide range of health service disciplines. This accomplishment, while considerable in terms of numbers trained annually, has not been commensurate with the potentialities of the VA system for helping to meet the national health manpower crisis. Fortified by recent legislation encouraging the agency to conduct education and training of health manpower, the VA is planning a marked expansion of existent training and the development of new programs adapted to the rapidly changing demands of American medicine.
Bedside Multimarker Testing for Risk Stratification in Chest Pain Units: The Chest Pain Evaluation by Creatine Kinase-MB, Myoglobin, and Troponin I (CHECKMATE) Study
Authors: Fred S. Apple, Allan S. Jaffe
Journal: Circulation (2001)

We wish to raise several questions about the article by Newby et al. 1 It purports to demonstrate that a quantitative multimarker strategy is better for chest pain patients than a single marker strategy because it identifies patients who are at risk for death earlier.(1) How would the results differ if the recent criteria advocated by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) 2,3 were used [ie, the 99th percentile of the normal range or at a point with Յ10% imprecision 2-4 ]? (2) Because local values were used for the single marker strategy, were the cut points similar to those used by the Dade-Behring Stratus CS analyzer?It appears to us that had that been the case, more patients would have been detected earlier than reported, especially with the single marker troponin strategy.(3) How would a myoglobin, troponin standard fare?Both Cardiology and Laboratory Medicine groups 2-5 have recommended this standard.( 4) Are there any statistical differences between the markers in Table 1? (5) Since myoglobin and creatine kinase MB (CKMB) both can be released from skeletal muscle, if patients with false-positive CKMB values were included as having myocardial infarctions, they would have been detected with these assays but not troponin.How are the data affected if troponin is utilized as the gold standard?The issues we pose are critical ones to this entire literature.The criteria any investigators chose (even if prospective) can markedly effect the results of studies as well as clinical results and lead to redundant and costly care.That may be the case with the present trial since the issue of cost was not addressed.3][4] Even worse, if these issues are not understood, such studies can confuse us and reduce our ability to diagnose and treat patients in an optimal fashion.
Radiologio Exploration of the Mucosa of the Gastro-Intestinal Tract
Journal: JAMA (1934)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Combined live rubella-mumps virus vaccine. Findings in clinical-laboratory studies
Authors: R. E. Weibel
Journal: JAMA (1971)

Four lots of combined bivalent HPV-77 duck rubella-Jeryl Lynn mumps vaccine (Biavax) were administered to a total of 415 children 7 months to 7 years of age who were initially without antibody against either virus. Overall, 94% of the children developed rubella hemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies and 96% developed mumps neutralizing antibodies. The geometric mean antibody titers were 1:35.9 and 1:6.8, respectively. The antibody responses approximated those obtained in previous studies when the individual vaccines were given alone. Clinical reactions including joint involvement and fever were notably absent among the children during the 28-day follow-up. The combined rubella-mumps vaccine provides a simple means for immunizing against both these diseases without impairment of immune response and without significant clinical reaction.
Association of diabetes with colorectal cancer treatment and outcomes.
Authors: Arjun Iyengar, Heather Taffet Gold, Daniel Jacob Becker
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2018)

e18752 Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased incidence of colorectal cancer, but the impact of diabetes on colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis and treatment patterns remains unknown. As outcomes in both CRC and DM have improved, appropriate co-management of the two diseases has become a priority to help patients live longer and healthier. This abstract represents the completed project for which preliminary data was previously presented at ASCO. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases was performed to evaluate/assess the association of diabetes with colon cancer treatment patterns and outcomes, including recurrence rates (RR), disease free survival (DFS), colon cancer-specific (CSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM). We included English language peer-reviewed studies through November 2016 following the preferred reporting items of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) method. We applied STROBE quality criteria and conducted a random-effects meta-analysis. An inconsistency index (I2) was used to estimate the heterogeneity between studies. Results: After reviewing 14,318 reports, 42 studies were included that described an association of DM with CRC treatment patterns or outcomes. A meta-analysis of 33 studies that assessed ACM among 378,528 patients demonstrated an increased risk for ACM for CRC patients with DM (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.15-1.29, I2 = 86%, P < .00001). No statistical significance was found in comparing 10 studies that looked at CSM (OR 1.10, 95% CI .97-1.26, I2 = 85%, P = 0.15). Analysis of 4 studies that assessed DFS found lower DFS in patients with DM (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.33-2.31, I = 3%, P < .0001). Aggregating 3 studies that evaluated RFS demonstrated no clear association of DM and RFS (OR 1.12, CI 95% 0.91-1.38, I = 64%, P = .27). No consistent treatment discrepancies were noted in 6 studies that assessed the impact of DM on various CRC treatment modalities (receipt of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation). Conclusions: CRC patients with diabetes are at a greater risk for ACM and have worse DFS compared to those without DM. Analysis was limited due to study heterogeneity. We did not find consistent evidence that CRC is treated differently in patients with DM.
Confirmation of the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Oral Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large-B-Cell Lymphoma: Results of An International Study (NHL-003)
Authors: Myron S. Czuczman, Julie M. Vose, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Craig B. Reeder, Rena Buckstein, Corinne Haioun, Reda Bouabdallah, Jonathan Polikoff, Pingshan Guo, Annette Ervin-Haynes, Dennis Pietronigro, Jerome B. Zeldis, Thomas E. Witzig
Journal: Blood (2008)
Erratum to: Survival in patients without acute ST elevation after cardiac arrest and association with early coronary angiography: a post hoc analysis from the TTM trial
Authors: J. Dankiewicz, N. Nielsen, M. Annborn, T. Cronberg, D. Erlinge, Y. Gasche, C. Hassager, J. Kjaergaard, T. Pellis, H. Friberg
Journal: Intensive Care Medicine (2015)
Human Plague—India, 1994
Journal: JAMA (1994)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Book Review Die Bruchoperation Nach Bassini . von Doktor Attilio Catterina, O.O. Professor der chirurgischen Operationslehre und der klg. Universität in Genua. Mit 16 farbigen Bildern von Maler Horatius Gaigher, Doktor der gesamten Heilkunde. Published 1933 by Urban &amp; Schwarzenherg, Berlin und Wien.
Journal: New England Journal of Medicine (1933)