POS1567-PARE ASSESSMENT OF ADHERENCE AMONG GREEK PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES DURING THE COVID-19 ERA
Authors: K. Koutsogianni, E. Repa, K. Spanidou, I. Papadakis, I. Chatzikrystallis, P. Pratsidou-Gertsi, F. Asimakopoulou
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2022)

Background Patient’s (pts) adherence is a EULAR important recommendation for an optimal disease course and outcome. COVID-19 pandemic has globally challenged the issue of adherence. As relevant Greek data are lacking, the PanHellenic Federation “Rheumazein” (i.e., co-living with a Rheumatic Disease) conducted a survey among their members to assess adherence and a possible COVID-related negative impact. Objectives The main endpoint of the study aimed to capture the degree of pt adherence to treatment, either with conventional synthetic or/and biologic DMARDS (csDMARDS, bDMARDS). The secondary endpoints were: a. To record pts’–physicians’ interactive communication to assess the level of shared disease making (SDM). b. The emerged barriers to medication access during the pandemic and consequent restrictive measures. c. To record pt perceptions on the usefulness of mobile reminder applications towards an uninterrupted regimen. Methods A 29-item quantitative questionnaire was uploaded in the social media of the Federation and its associations, in order to register pts’ responses on the aforementioned sections. The questionnaire was accessible for a 58-day period (21/09/2021-17/11/2021). Results Participants’ characteristics: The responses of 303 adults with RD (M:F 63:240), aged (in yrs) 18-44: 35%, 45-54: 26%, &gt;55: 38% respectively, were available for analysis. The RD types were RA 33%, AS 18%, PsA 13%, SLE 18%, Juvenile Arthritis 5% and Other RD 13%, respectively. Τhe education level was low/moderate 39%, high 30%, post-graduate 31%, respectively. Receivers of a monotherapy with either cs- or bDMARDS were 93(31%) and 83(27%), of a combined regimen cs+bDMARDs 114(38%) and off treatment 13 (4%). BDMARD receivers were mostly AS pts (93%) while the least, SLE pts (48%). The route of bDMARD administration (sc vs iv did not significantly differ (57% vs. 43%). Since diagnosis, the mean disease trajectory was 7.6 yrs, the mean time on medication 6.9 yrs, while the mean duration on the current regimen 3 yrs, respectively. Adherence: At least one skipped dose during the last trimester was reported, significantly more often by pts under csDMARDs than by those under bDMARDs, (60% vs. 40%, p&lt;0.001) with a mean number of 2.7 vs. 1.8 skipped doses, respectively. Additionally, the main reasons of non-adherence under csDMARDs and bDMARDs significantly differed only in respect to pt responsibility (56% vs.19% p&lt;0.001), but not for COVID-related reasons, namely fear either of getting infected, or due to a performed COVID vaccination (35% vs 42%), or due to physician recommendations (22% vs. 32%). Regarding the pt-physician interactive discussions on emerging new treatments, 90% of the pts reported this policy, but only 40% of them in a rather frequent to more frequent rate. In respect to satisfaction, 67% expressed a moderate to high satisfaction regarding the level of provided information, while the degree of their satisfaction was positively related with the frequency of these discussions. The main topics focused on the route and frequency of the medication, especially with bDMARD receivers. Of note, 80% of the bDMARD group participated in the SDM before commencing this therapy, but just 20% in the selection of the brand name. Only a minority of pts (17%) were aware of the existence of mobile applications, reminding the scheduled drug administration; however, they rated these programs as very useful (4.3 according to a 0-5 scale). Despite the difference source of supply of cs and bDMARDs on pt access to treatment, the impact of COVID-19 and consequent restrictive measures had not impaired it (1.5/5 and 1.7/5 by the above scale, respectively). Conclusion A significant percentage of pts skip scheduled DMARD administrations, especially those (60%) under csDMARDs. The relationship with the physician was considered relatively satisfactory. Most of the pts did not have any mobile phone reminder application regarding their dose. Finally, the COVID-19 pandemic appeared to have had little effect on pts’ access to both cs- and bDMARDs and consequently, adherence to their treatments. Disclosure of Interests None declared