Landscape of tumor genetic testing and targeted therapies over an eight-year span in a rural population.
Authors: Casey B. Williams, Sunny Guin, Rachel Elsey, Tobias Meißner, Bing Xu, Yuliang Sun, Anu Amallraja, Tomi Jun, Eric Schadt, Rong Chen, Xiang Zhou, Mitchell Higashi, John H. Lee, William K. Oh
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2022)

e15036 Background: Advances in tumor molecular profiling and bioinformatics are adding new insights to support real-world research. In this study, paired tumor NGS testing data was curated and analyzed from electronic medical records (EMR) to understand mutational and targeted therapy landscape. Methods: A database initiated in 2013 to collect data, including outcomes, on all patients referred to the molecular tumor board at the Avera Cancer Institute was curated and analyzed. A data pipeline that combined results from curated NGS data with curated EMR data from Avera was used to correlate targetable mutations to a corresponding therapy and assessed treatment patterns. Results: Data were from 1804 patients with 44 cancer types including breast (462; 26%), lung (338;19%), colorectal (198;11%), ovarian (168;9%), and uterine (100;5%). Overall, 83% of patients had a positive NGS result and 67% had a targetable mutation per NCCN guidelines. 32% of patients with a targetable mutation received targeted therapy per guideline. Overall, 381 patients with 28 tumor types received targeted therapies based on NGS results and targetable biomarkers. Of these, 288/381 (76%) were stage III-IV and 93/381 (24%) early stage/stage unknown. In non-small cell lung cancer, 76% of stage III-IV patients with mutations in EGFR (exon 19 deletion, L858, L861, S768, G719), MET (exon 14 skipping, amplification), BRAF V600 and ALK/ ROS1/ RET fusions received a targeted therapy per NCCN guidelines. In advanced breast cancer, 97% with ERBB2 amplification received targeted therapy (trastuzumab, pertuzumab, neratinib, lapatinib, tucatinib). 8% of advanced breast cancer patients with PIK3CA mutation received alpelisib, with all patients receiving the drug since 2019. 38% advanced breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutation received Olaparib. In ovarian cancer, 48% of advanced stage patients received targeted therapy for BRCA 1/2, ATM, CDK12, CHEK2, ERBB2, FANCL, KRAS, ALK, BRAF alterations. Olaparib was used in 70% of advanced prostate cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations. Dabrafenib combined with Trametinib were most preferred for BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma and colorectal tumors respectively. Off label use of targeted therapy was observed in about 6% of advanced patients; examples include trametinib for KRAS/NRAS mutation [non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal, pancreatic, ovarian], PARP inhibitors for BRCA1/2, ATM mutations [urothelial, peritoneal], anti-ERBB2 inhibitors for ERBB2 in-frame, missense, exon 20 insertion mutations [lung and breast]. Conclusions: These study results demonstrate that automated data mining can provide insights into the genomic and therapeutic landscape of a real-world patient population. Across all tumor types, most patients are being given appropriate targeted therapies as per guidelines. Off-label use of targeted therapy was also observed.