POS0084 THE NOMENCLATURE OF CALCIUM PYROPHOSPHATE DEPOSITION (CPPD) DISEASE – RESULTS OF A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW FOR THE GOUT, HYPERURICEMIA AND CRYSTAL-ASSOCIATED DISEASE NETWORK (G-CAN) CPPD NOMENCLATURE PROJECT
Authors: S. Sirotti, E. Cipolletta, C. Jauffret, D. Cirillo, L. Ingrao, A. Lucia, E. Cumbo, A. Adinolfi, E. Filippucci, T. Pascart, S. Tedeschi, R. Terkeltaub, N. Dalbeth, G. Filippou
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2023)

<h3>Background</h3> Despite prior attempts at standardising terminology of calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease (including the 2011 EULAR recommendations for CPPD terminology), many different terms are still used interchangeably to describe the disease, its elements, and its states (Tedeschi SK, Curr Rheumatol Rep 2019). This confusing nomenclature has important implications for research and for patient care. The G-CAN has developed a CPPD Nomenclature Project which aims to achieve international consensus about the nomenclature of CPPD. <h3>Objectives</h3> In this first step of the project, the aim was to identify the definitions, the disease elements and the clinical states of CPPD and their corresponding labels in the scientific literature. <h3>Methods</h3> A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed database starting from 01/01/2000 to 31/01/2022. The search was restricted to studies on humans and in English language. Eight reviewers independently extracted terms related to disease definition, aetiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, imaging features and clinical states of CPPD. An <i>a priori</i> list of disease elements and clinical states was generated by the authors and further elements were added during data collection as appropriate. Labels for each identified disease element and clinical state were extracted and analysed to determine their frequency. An additional analysis was performed to evaluate the uptake of the 2011 EULAR recommendations on CPPD terminology after 2011. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 2392 articles were identified using the search criteria. We preliminarily evaluated 623 articles of which 246 were included. The list of evaluated elements is showed in <b>Figure 1</b>. There was great inconsistency in the terminology used for the disease, its elements and its states. The 3 most common labels used to identify the disease were "pseudogout", "calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease" and "chondrocalcinosis". The most common acronym used was "CPPD", mostly with the meaning of "calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease" or "calcium pyrophosphate deposition" (<b>Table 1</b>). The 2 most commonly used labels describing "an episode of acute CPPD arthritis" were "pseudogout" (31%), and "acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis" (10%). For "more than one episode of acute CPPD arthritis", "recurrent pseudogout" (17%) or "recurrent arthritis" (10%) were the most used labels. "Chronic calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis" (13%) and "pseudo-rheumatoid arthritis" (11%) were the most commonly used labels to describe "persistent inflammatory arthritis due to CPPD". The most used labels used to identify "osteoarthritis with evidence of CPPD" were "pseudo-osteoarthritis" (11%) and "calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition with osteoarthritis" (9%). The use of "pseudo-form" labels mostly occurred before the 2011 EULAR recommendations. <h3>Conclusion</h3> These preliminary results demonstrate the variability and lack of precision in the labels used to describe CPPD disease. The next steps of the project will be to achieve agreement about CPPD disease nomenclature through a Delphi exercise and consensus meeting, and to develop an easily understandable common language definition to facilitate communication with patients. <h3>REFERENCES:</h3> NIL. <h3>Acknowledgements:</h3> NIL. <h3>Disclosure of Interests</h3> None Declared.