Abstract CT242: A phase I study of ruxolitinib in combination with abemaciclib for patients with primary or post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis
Authors: Jan P. Bewersdorf, Srdan Verstovsek, Andriy Derkach, Lucia Masarova, Naveen Pemmaraju, Eytan M. Stein, Michael Mauro, Raajit Rampal, Prithviraj Bose
Journal: Cancer Research (2023)

Abstract Introduction: Patients (pts) with primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF) have a reduced life expectancy. While several oral Janus Kinase (JAK)-1/2 inhibitors such as ruxolitinib (RUX) have demonstrated improvements in symptom burden and spleen volume reduction compared to physician choice of best available therapy leading to their approval by the US FDA, responses to these agents are generally time-limited. Additionally, these agents are not considered to be disease-modifying and survival in pts after RUX discontinuation is poor with a median survival of 11-14 months. Thus, novel mechanism-based therapies for pts with suboptimal response or progression on RUX are needed. Preclinical Rationale: JAK2 V617F mutations promote transition from G1 to S-phase of the cell cycle via increased expression of CDC25A in preclinical models and CDC25A expression is upregulated in primary MPN patient samples. Additional cell cycle regulators such as CDK6 and Cyclin D also play a role in MF pathogenesis and drive myeloproliferation. Finally, combination of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib and RUX demonstrated reduction in spleen and liver size when compared to RUX alone in murine models, suggesting synergy (Rampal et al., CCR 2021). Methods: This multicenter, phase I dose-escalation trial evaluates the safety of RUX + the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib in pts with primary or secondary MF with intermediate-1/2 or high-risk disease by DIPSS who require treatment and had an inadequate response to RUX. An inadequate response will be defined by (I) palpable splenomegaly ≥5 cm below the left costal margin at study entry AND/OR (II) active MPN symptoms [presence of 1 symptom score ≥5 or 2 symptom scores ≥3 using the screening MPN-SAF TSS. This study follows a conventional “3+3” dose-escalation design, in which pts on a stable dose of RUX (10mg or 15mg BID) with sufficient baseline platelet and absolute neutrophil count will be treated with increasing doses of abemaciclib. Abemaciclib was chosen due to less myelosuppression compared with other CDK4/6 inhibitors. The pre-study dose of ruxolitinib will be maintained to determine the maximum tolerated dose of the combination of RUX+ abemaciclib. The primary endpoint is to determine the safety and tolerability, and to identify the recommended phase II dose of abemaciclib in MF pts on a stable dose of RUX. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate, progression-free and overall survival, and duration of response per the modified International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and the European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2013 consensus definitions. Correlative studies are planned to identify biomarkers predictive of response to RUX + abemaciclib, mechanisms of resistance (e.g., MAP kinase pathway activation), and any disease-modifying effects of combination therapy. Citation Format: Jan P. Bewersdorf, Srdan Verstovsek, Andriy Derkach, Lucia Masarova, Naveen Pemmaraju, Eytan M. Stein, Michael Mauro, Raajit Rampal, Prithviraj Bose. A phase I study of ruxolitinib in combination with abemaciclib for patients with primary or post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT242.