POS0540 CLINICAL OUTCOMES ASSOCIATED WITH GLUCOCORTICOID DISCONTINUATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS RECEIVING UPADACITINIB OR ADALIMUMAB
Authors: R. M. Fleischmann, B. Combe, A. Ostor, C. F. Pacheco Tena, N. Khan, J. Suboticki, A. Shmagel, Y. Song, I. Lagunes-Galindo, G. R. Burmester
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2022)

Background Patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are often administered glucocorticoids (GCs) as bridging therapy when initiating or adjusting disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Due to their systemic effects, short-term use of GCs at the lowest possible dose is recommended with rapid tapering. 1 Objectives We describe GC discontinuation patterns and the associated clinical outcomes in pts with RA receiving upadacitinib (UPA) or adalimumab (ADA). Methods SELECT-COMPARE is a randomized phase 3 trial of UPA vs placebo and ADA with a 48-week (wk) double-blind treatment period and a 10-year long-term extension in pts with RA receiving concomitant methotrexate (MTX) who had an inadequate response to MTX. 2 Background GCs (≤10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) were permitted and could be tapered or discontinued starting at wk 26 per physician discretion. This post hoc analysis included pts who received ≥1 dose of UPA 15 mg once daily or ADA 40 mg every other wk while on concomitant GCs at baseline. The proportion of pts with disease worsening (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] &gt;2 and Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein [DAS28-CRP] &gt;0.6) following GC discontinuation through follow-up is described. Maintenance of clinical response, including remission and low disease activity based on CDAI ≤2.8 and ≤10, respectively, as well as DAS28-CRP &lt;2.6 and ≤3.2, were assessed among pts who discontinued GCs. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed before and after GC discontinuation through follow-up. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results Of 1,629 pts randomized, 978 (60%) used GCs at baseline; 128 (13%) discontinued use at/after wk 26 (UPA, n=97; ADA, n=31). Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were broadly similar between pts who continued or discontinued GCs. Median follow-up time after GC discontinuation was 60 wks for UPA and 84 wks for ADA. At the time of GC discontinuation, a numerically higher proportion of pts treated with UPA vs ADA were in disease control (CDAI ≤2.8: 55% vs 32%; CDAI ≤10: 85% vs 68%; DAS28-CRP &lt;2.6: 71% vs 48%; DAS28-CRP ≤3.2: 87% vs 62%) (Table 1). Few pts receiving UPA experienced disease worsening following GC discontinuation (1% CDAI increase &gt;2; 7% DAS28-CRP increase &gt;0.6) and none on ADA (Table 1). At 6 months follow-up after GC discontinuation, most pts treated with UPA and ADA maintained CDAI ≤2.8 (74% vs 88%) and ≤10 (92% vs 95%) and DAS28-CRP &lt;2.6 (89% vs 85%) and ≤3.2 (91% vs 94%), respectively (Table 1). GCs were reintroduced (albeit usually temporarily) in 14% of pts on UPA and 19% on ADA (Figure 1). AEs were generally similar across treatment groups. Rates of serious infection before and after GC discontinuation were 0.8 (95% CI 0.0–4.2) and 1.5 (0.2–5.4) events per 100 patient-years (E/100 PY) for UPA and 7.7 (1.6–22.4) and 0 E/100 PY for ADA, respectively. Interpretation of results is limited by small pt numbers and different exposure times. Table 1. Clinical outcomes of pts who discontinued GCs at/after wk 26 n/N (%) Pts who discontinued GCs N=128 UPAn=97 ADAn=31 CDAI ≤10 at discontinuation 79/93 (85%) 21/31 (68%) Maintained at 6 months post discontinuation a 61/66 (92%) 18/19 (95%) ≤2.8 at withdrawal 51/93 (55%) 10/31 (32%) Maintained at 6 months post discontinuation a 32/43 (74%) 7/8 (88%) Increase &gt;2 any visit after withdrawal 1/93 (1%) 0 DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 at withdrawal 78/90 (87%) 18/29 (62%) Maintained at 6 months post discontinuation a 58/64 (91%) 15/16 (94%) &lt;2.6 at withdrawal 64/90 (71%) 14/29 (48%) Maintained at 6 months post discontinuation a 47/53 (89%) 11/13 (85%) Increase &gt;0.6 any visit after withdrawal 6/92 (7%) 0 a As a proportion of pts achieving outcome at GC discontinuation and with observed data 6 months post GC discontinuation. Conclusion In pts who achieved disease control and discontinued GCs, disease control was maintained in almost all without worsening disease activity over time following GC discontinuation. Conclusion In pts who achieved disease control and discontinued GCs, disease control was maintained in almost all without worsening disease activity over time following GC discontinuation. References [1]Smolen JS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:685–99. [2]Fleischmann R, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:1454–62. Acknowledgements AbbVie funded this study and participated in the study design, research, analysis, data collection, interpretation of data, review, and approval of the publication. All authors had access to relevant data and participated in the drafting, review, and approval of this publication. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Medical writing assistance was provided by Julia Zolotarjova, MSc, MWC of AbbVie Inc. Disclosure of Interests Roy M. Fleischmann Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Galvani, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Flexion, Galvani, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Noven, Pfizer, Samumed, Selecta, Teva, UCB, Viela, and Vorso., Bernard Combe Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Gilead-Galapagos, Janssen, Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche-Chugai, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Gilead-Galapagos, Janssen, Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche-Chugai, Grant/research support from: Pfizer and Roche-Chugai, Andrew Ostor Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Paradigm, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB., Cesar Francisco Pacheco Tena Consultant of: AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, R-Pharm, Sanofi Regeneron, and UCB., Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, R-Pharm, Sanofi Regeneron, and UCB., Nasser Khan Shareholder of: May own AbbVie stock or stock options, Employee of: AbbVie, Jessica Suboticki Shareholder of: May own AbbVie stock or stock options, Employee of: AbbVie, Anna Shmagel Shareholder of: May own AbbVie stock or stock options, Employee of: AbbVie, Yanna Song Shareholder of: May own AbbVie stock or stock options, Employee of: AbbVie, Ivan Lagunes-Galindo Shareholder of: May own AbbVie stock or stock options, Employee of: AbbVie, Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB., Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB.