Abstract 2649: Orally bioavailable small molecule CXCR4 antagonists with enhanced efficacy in mouse models of genitourinary cancers
Authors: Eric J. Miller, Carrie Q. Sun, Petra Gregorova, Edgars Jecs, Yesim Altas Tahirovic, Robert J. Wilson, Huy H. Nguyen, Savita K. Sharma, Perry Bartsch, Zachary Sticher, Levi Moellering, Priscilla Davidson, Ryan Jajosky, Michael D'Erasmo, Manohar Saindane, Zafer Sahin, Nicholas S. Akins, Alexander A. Kolykhalov, Lawrence Wilson, Rebecca S. Arnold, John A. Petros, Haydn Kissick, Lingjie Xu, Yi Jiang, Dennis C. Liotta
Journal: Cancer Research (2022)

Abstract Purpose: Pro-angiogenic and immune cells expressing chemokine receptor CXCR4 traffic along concentration gradients of the chemokine ligand CXCL12, which disseminates from stromal niches. The CXCR4/CXCL12 axis is hijacked by various cancer types characterized by dramatic CXCR4 and/or CXCL12 upregulation. This chemokine network misregulation causes hyperactivation of CXCR4-mediated processes, leading to (1) excessive stimulation of protective tumor-stromal interactions, (2) metastatic expansion of CXCR4+ cancer cells to CXCL12-rich sites, and (3) intratumoral infiltration of CXCR4+ immunosuppressive cells. Accordingly, CXCR4 antagonists have significant therapeutic potential against cancer. While clinical CXCR4 inhibitors are severely limited by suboptimal pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and off-target activities, several of our tetrahydroisoquinoline-based CXCR4 antagonists exhibit superior selectivity and PK profiles to these clinical comparators (e.g., X4P-001). Methods: To test the hypothesis that improved PK profiles would translate to enhanced efficacy, our lead CXCR4 antagonist EMU-116 was compared to X4P-001 head-to-head in three mouse models of genitourinary cancers. First, human 786.0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) xenograft-bearing female nude mice were treated p.o., q.d. with vehicle, axitinib (30 mg/kg), X4P-001 (100 mg/kg), EMU-116 (3, 10, or 30 mg/kg), X4P + axitinib, or EMU-116 + axitinib. Subcutaneous tumor volume was monitored using calipers. Second, nude male mice bearing intratibial, luciferase-expressing human PC-3 prostate cancer xenografts were treated with vehicle (p.o., q.d.), docetaxel (10 mg/kg i.p. weekly), X4P-001 (10 or 30 mg/kg p.o., q.d.), EMU-116 (10 or 30 mg/kg p.o., q.d.), X4P + axitinib, or EMU + axitinib. Intratibial tumor volume was monitored via luminescence imaging. Third, syngeneic RENCA RCC tumor-bearing female Balb/c mice were treated p.o., q.d. with vehicle, X4P-001 (30 mg/kg), or EMU-116 (30 mg/kg). Subcutaneous tumor volume was monitored using calipers, and immune cell subsets in bone marrow, blood, tumor, and tumor-draining lymph nodes were quantified via flow cytometry. Results: In the RCC xenograft model in combination with axitinib, EMU-116 (3 or 10 mg/kg) was equally effective at decreasing tumor burden compared to X4P-001 (100 mg/kg), whereas EMU-116 (30 mg/kg) was more effective. In the bone metastatic prostate cancer xenograft model, EMU-116 was as or more effective than X4P-001 when paired with docetaxel. In the syngeneic RCC model, EMU-116 mobilized T cells more effectively than X4P-001. Conclusion: EMU-116, at the same or lower dose, was more efficacious than X4P-001 in these models. These results highlight EMU-116 as a clinical candidate with significant therapeutic potential to synergize with chemotherapeutics, targeted therapies, and immuno-oncology agents. Citation Format: Eric J. Miller, Carrie Q. Sun, Petra Gregorova, Edgars Jecs, Yesim Altas Tahirovic, Robert J. Wilson, Huy H. Nguyen, Savita K. Sharma, Perry Bartsch, Zachary Sticher, Levi Moellering, Priscilla Davidson, Ryan Jajosky, Michael D'Erasmo, Manohar Saindane, Zafer Sahin, Nicholas S. Akins, Alexander A. Kolykhalov, Lawrence Wilson, Rebecca S. Arnold, John A. Petros, Haydn Kissick, Lingjie Xu, Yi Jiang, Dennis C. Liotta. Orally bioavailable small molecule CXCR4 antagonists with enhanced efficacy in mouse models of genitourinary cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2649.