A core domain set for pyoderma gangrenosum trial outcomes: an international eDelphi and consensus study from the UPGRADE initiative
Authors: Michael E Jacobson, Jonathan W Rick, Louise A A Gerbens, Wenelia Baghoomian, Lisa J Gould, Angelo V Marzano, Diana M Chen, Debbie L Oakes, Joachim Dissemond, Toshiyuki Yamamoto, Kanade Shinkai, Barbara Nolan, Dan Lobato, Kim S Thomas, Alex G Ortega-Loayza, Jonathan Rick, Lisa J Gould, Angelo V Marzano, Amit Garg, Diana M Chen, Debbie L Oakes, Joachim Dissemond, Hans Herfarth, Marcia A Friedman, Afsaneh Alavi, Toshiyuki Yamamoto, Louise A A Gerbens, Kim S Thomas, Alex G Ortega-Loayza, Michael E Jacobson, Wenelia Baghoomian, Jonathan Rick, Louise A A Gerbens, Kim S Thomas, Alex G Ortega-Loayza, Mihaly Imre, Jonathan Rick, Philip Hampton, Kim Thomas, Antonios Kolios, Jean Bolognia, Luca Borradori, Maurice Moelleken, Michael Jacobson, Ashley Gray, Carlo Alberto Maronese, Daniel Wallach, David Croitoru, Ben Kaffenberger, Angelo Valerio Marzano, Lisa Jeanne Gould, Pete Williams, Neil Korman, Diana Chen, Kyle Amber, Stan N Tolkachjov, Caitlin Purvis, Linda Benskin, Kanade Shinkai, Alex G Ortega-Loayza
Journal: British Journal of Dermatology (2023)

Abstract Background Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare ulcerative skin condition with no current standardized outcomes or outcome measures. With a rich investigational therapeutic pipeline, standardization of outcomes and improvement of data quality and interpretability will promote the appropriate and consistent evaluation of potential new therapies. Core outcome sets (COS) are agreed, standardized sets of outcomes that represent the minimum that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials of a specific condition. Objectives To identify and reach a consensus on which domains (what to be measured) should be included in the Understanding Pyoderma Gangrenosum: Review and Analysis of Disease Effects (UPGRADE) core domain set for clinical trials in PG. Methods Collaborative discussions between patients and PG experts, and a systematic review of the literature identified items and prospective domains. A three-round international eDelphi exercise was performed to prioritize the domains and refine the provisional items (consensus: ≥ 70% of participants rating a domain as ‘extremely important’ and &amp;lt; 15% of participants voting ‘not important’), followed by an international meeting to reach consensus on the core domain set (consensus: &amp;lt; 30% disagreement). Item-generation discussions and consensus meetings were hosted via online videoconferences. The eDelphi exercise and consensus voting were performed using Qualtrics survey software. Participants were adults with PG, healthcare professionals, researchers and industry representatives. Results Collaborative discussions and systematic reviews yielded 115 items, which were distilled into 15 prospective domains. The eDelphi exercise removed the three lowest-priority domains (‘laboratory tests’, ‘treatment costs’ and ‘disease impact on family’) and ranked ‘pain’, ‘quality of life’ and ‘physical symptoms’ as the highest-priority prospective domains. Consensus was reached on the domains of ‘pain’, ‘quality of life’ and ‘clinical signs’. The domain of ‘disease course/disease progression’ narrowly failed to reach consensus for inclusion in the core set (32% of participants voted ‘no’). Refinement of this domain definition will be required and presented for consideration at future consensus meetings. Conclusions The UPGRADE core domain set for clinical trials in PG has been agreed by international multistakeholder consensus. Future work will develop and/or select outcome measurement instruments for these domains to establish a COS.