Abstract P5-02-17: Prognostic and predictive role of RBsig and CCNE1/RB1 gene-expression signatures in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy in the PALOMA-2 and 3 trials
Authors: Luca Malorni, Matteo Benelli, Yuan Liu, Shibing Deng, Zhe Zhang, Cristina Guarducci, Angela Leo, Agostina Nardone, Francesca Galardi, Emanuela Risi, Erica Moretti, Dario Romagnoli, Chiara Biagioni, Marta Paoli, Laura Biganzoli, Ilenia Migliaccio
Journal: Cancer Research (2023)

Abstract Background: We have previously identified two potentially predictive signatures of palbociclib resistance: the RBsig, composed of E2F1/E2F2 dependent genes, which is correlated with genetic loss of RB1, and the ratio between the gene expression levels of CCNE1 to RB1 (CCNE1/RB1). Both signatures have been previously tested in vitro and in neoadjuvant studies with palbociclib. The present analysis aims to explore the prognostic and predictive role of RBsig and CCNE1/RB1 in the pivotal phase III randomized trials PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3. Materials and methods: Gene expression data from the PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 datasets were generated using the HTG EdgeSeq Oncology BM Panel, as previously described. Of the 87 genes composing RBsig, 46 were available within the EdgeSeq dataset and were used for the analyses; CCNE1 and RB1 were both available. RBsig was calculated as the mean of the Z-score scaled gene expression (log) of the 46 genes; CCNE1/RB1 was computed as the log ratio between the mRNA expression of CCNE1 and RB1. High and low values of RBsig and CCNE1/RB1 were defined based on the third quartile (Q3) as cutoff or as continuous variables. The prognostic/predictive effect of the signatures in terms of PFS was tested using Cox proportional hazard models and the Wald test. Results: The 46-genes RBsig versus the original signature showed excellent correlation in the METABRIC dataset (R=0.99), confirming its reliability as a surrogate of the original RBsig using EdgeSeq data. In both PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3, RBsig high was significantly associated with a worse outcome compared to RBsig low in the palbociclib arm but not in the control arm [PALOMA-2: HR 1.4 (95% CI 1.0, 2.0) p=0.029 for palbociclib arm; HR 1.1 (95% CI 0.7, 1.6) p=0.71 for control arm. PALOMA-3: HR 1.7 (95% CI 1.1, 2.6) p=0.01 for palbociclib arm; HR 1.2 (95% CI 0.7, 1.9) p= 0.49 for control arm]. However, in both studies RBsig was not predictive of palbociclib resistance both when considered as a continuous variable and when dichotomized at Q3. Similarly to RBsig, in PALOMA- 3 patients with CCNE1/RB1 high tumors treated in the palbociclib arm showed a significantly worse outcome compared to those with CCNE1/RB1 low but this effect was not observed in those treated in the control arm [HR 1.6 (95% CI 1.1- 2.5) p= 0.03 for palbociclib arm; HR 1.2 (95% CI 0.7, 1.9) p=0.5 for control arm]. In addition, CCNE1/RB1 as a continuous variable was predictive of palbociclib benefit in PALOMA-3 (interaction p= 0.047). These effects were not observed in PALOMA-2. Conclusions: RBsig is a prognostic biomarker in patients treated with palbociclib, suggesting it may help in patients’ risk stratification. CCNE1/RB1 is predictive of palbociclib benefit in PALOMA-3, but not in PALOMA-2 probably due to the different patient populations and characteristics. Further studies of these biomarkers in patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in the metastatic as well in the adjuvant setting are warranted. Citation Format: Luca Malorni, Matteo Benelli, Yuan Liu, Shibing Deng, Zhe Zhang, Cristina Guarducci, Angela Leo, Agostina Nardone, Francesca Galardi, Emanuela Risi, Erica Moretti, Dario Romagnoli, Chiara Biagioni, Marta Paoli, Laura Biganzoli, Ilenia Migliaccio. Prognostic and predictive role of RBsig and CCNE1/RB1 gene-expression signatures in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy in the PALOMA-2 and 3 trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-02-17.