Abstract P5-04-05: Predictors of guideline-incongruent breast cancer screening in an urban comprehensive cancer center
Authors: Alexandra Wehbe, Madeleine Gonte, Suzanne O’Neill, Alit Amit-Yousif, Kristen Purrington, Mark Manning, Michael Simon
Journal: Cancer Research (2023)

Abstract Background: Guideline-congruent breast cancer (BC) screening is imperative to systematically curb BC mortality. This study was conducted to identify predictors of BC screening behaviors congruent with guidelines from various nationally recognized organizations (e.g, American Cancer Society, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American College of Radiology) among high- and average-risk women, and to elucidate the alternative screening behaviors of women who were incongruently screened. Methods: Medical records of 6,090 women who received at least two screening mammograms from January 2016 to March 2018 at the Karmanos Cancer Institute were reviewed to determine breast cancer risk status (classified by the Tyrer-Cuzick model) and breast density status to determine whether breast cancer screening was concordant with risk-driven screening guidelines. Breast density was determined by BI-RADS density scoring, with non-dense breasts defined by a score of A or B, and dense breasts as C or D. For women at average-risk of breast cancer, incongruent screening was defined as receiving supplemental imaging in the interval between screening mammograms. For high-risk women, incongruent screening was defined as not having a recommended supplemental image in the interval between screening mammograms. Further, we examined BC risk, breast density, age, and race as predictors for guideline-concordant screening. Results: The screening cohort included 73.3% Black and 26.7% White women of whom 86.5% were classified as average-risk, 7.7% intermediate risk and 5.8% high risk. Further analyses focused on women with average and high-risk of breast cancer. Among both average- and high-risk women, 390 (6.9%) were incongruently screened, however the rate of incongruent screening was much higher among high-risk vs. average risk women (97.7 vs. 0.9%, p&amp;lt; 0.01). Among average-risk women, incongruent screening was more likely among women with dense vs. non-dense breasts (2.0% vs 0.1%, p&amp;lt; .01). High-risk women were more likely to be incongruently screened if they had non-dense compared to dense breasts (99.5% vs 95.2%, p &amp;lt; .01). Younger women more likely to be incongruently screened among average-risk women (55.11 [SD = 10.24] vs 62.20 [SD = 9.73]; t5267 = 4.87, p &amp;lt; .01, d = 0.73), whereas older women were more likely to be incongruently screened among high-risk women, although this difference was not statistically significant (52.38 [SD = 7.27] vs 47.50 [SD = 8.57]; t351 = 1.87, p = .06, d = 0.67).There was no significant impact of race and incongruent screening for individual risk-level categories. With the exception of rendering the age effect non-significant, preliminary multivariable analyses did not significantly change the results. Further analyses will be conducted to assess the relationship between predictive factors and incongruent screening. Conclusions: An apparent lack of adherence to evidence-based screening guidelines for BC has led to underutilization of supplementary breast imaging for women at high-risk for BC. Further interventions are needed to promote increased supplemental imaging for this group of women. Citation Format: Alexandra Wehbe, Madeleine Gonte, Suzanne O’Neill, Alit Amit-Yousif, Kristen Purrington, Mark Manning, Michael Simon. Predictors of guideline-incongruent breast cancer screening in an urban comprehensive cancer center [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-05.