POS1565-PARE ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY AND RELIABILITY OF YOUTUBE VIDEOS FOR PATIENT AND PHYSICIAN EDUCATION ON INFLAMMATORY MYOSITIS
Authors: M. Joshi, N. R, R. Gupta, V. Agarwal, R. Aggarwal, L. Gupta
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2022)

Background Nowadays 80% of internet users access health information online, with YouTube being the second most popular search website worldwide. This study was undertaken to assess the reliability and quality of videos pertaining to myositis on YouTube and identify lacunae in information material on the platform. Objectives This study aims to assess the quality and profile of myositis information videos on YouTube, and to compare and delineate attributes of useful and not useful videos using standard metrics. Methods A thorough search was carried out on YouTube using 9 search terms related to myositis. The inclusion criteria were primary English content related to myositis, acceptable audio-video quality, and multi-part videos to be considered as one, while duplicates and advertisements were excluded. The videos were classified as useful, not useful or misleading, and patient experiences (Figure 1). Figure 1. Flowchart of selection of YouTube videos for the study Reliability of the videos was determined using the 5-point modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria and quality by the 5-point Global Quality Scale (GQS) and 4-point JAMA scoring system. Score-based usefulness was defined as mDISCERN &gt;4 or GQS &gt;4 or JAMA &gt;3. All values are in median and IQR. Results Of 453 analyzed videos 74% and 2% provided useful and not useful information respectively. 24% were patient experiences, and 324 (71%) were intended specifically for patients while 313 (69%) were for healthcare providers and students. Nearly one-thirds (n=143) reported information related to treatment of myositis. Noteworthily, useful and not useful videos had similar views count. However, number of likes and daily viewership were higher for useful videos (p=0.024, p=0.046). Nearly half (47%) of useful videos were by professional medical societies/patient support groups while not useful ones were often by nonmedical media (38%). Useful videos had higher mDISCERN reliability scores [4(3-4) vs 2(1-3), p&lt;0.001] and better quality on GQS [4.5 (3.5-5) vs 1 (1-2.8), p&lt;0.001] and JAMA [3 (3-4) vs 2.25 (2-3), p=0.004]. Physician predicted usefulness was discordant with score-based usefulness(κ=0.129). However, GQS score emerged significant (p=0.008) for predicting video usefulness in multivariate analysis (Table 1). Table 1. Factors predicting usefulness of video in binary logistic regression. Variable B coefficient S.E. Exp (B) and 95% CI p value Intended audience Anyone/General public -5.45 2.586 0.004 (0.0-0.68) 0.035 Average GQS -2.86 1.076 0.05 (0.007-0.47) 0.008 GQS Global Quality Scale . Exp (B) is odd’s ratio, p&lt;0.05 is significant Conclusion Majority of English YouTube videos on myositis provide useful information for patients, largely related to treatment of myositis. However, the dynamic nature of YouTube could potentially change this equation in the future and physicians should correct any misinformation identified in face-to-face meetings or teleconsultations. High quality useful videos, often predicted by validated scores and produced by professional medical societies should be promoted as the first line of content consumed. Disclosure of Interests None declared