Baseline and early post-infusion biomarkers associated with optimal response to idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) in the KarMMa-3 study of triple-class–exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
Authors: Julia Piasecki, Keyur Desai, Carolyn Courtney, Ethan Thompson, Jim Pratt, Noopur S. Raje, Krina K. Patel, Marc S. Raab, Mark Cook, Katy L. Simonsen, Mihaela Popa McKiver, Shari Kaiser, Nathan Martin
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023)

8031 Background: Ide-cel, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, significantly improved median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall response rate (ORR) vs standard regimens (SRs) in patients (pts) with TCE RRMM in the KarMMa-3 study (NCT03651128; Rodríguez-Otero et al. NEJM 2023). Previous analyses in KarMMa (Munshi et al. NEJM 2021) of pts with later-line (4L+) TCE RRMM identified low baseline (BL) levels and complete clearance of soluble BCMA (sBCMA, a measure of tumor burden) and early minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity as correlates of durable response to ide-cel. The current analysis explored the association between biomarkers and efficacy or severity of inflammatory adverse events of ide-cel in KarMMa-3. Methods: sBCMA levels were measured in blood samples collected from pts in KarMMa-3 at BL and regular intervals from treatment (tx) initiation until confirmed progression. MRD status was assessed in bone marrow aspirate (clonoSeq; 10 -5 sensitivity) at 6 and 12 mo post infusion and reported in all pts, regardless of response. Biomarker analyses were based on pts who received ide-cel or ≥1 dose of SR. Post hoc analyses assessed correlations between biomarkers and efficacy endpoints or cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and investigator-identified neurotoxicity (iiNT); associations of interest were identified using a ranked sum test and nominal P value &lt; 0.05. Results: Lower BL sBCMA levels were associated with higher ORR ( &lt; partial response [PR] vs ≥PR) in both tx arms (ide-cel, P= 0.0223; SR, P= 0.0395), indicating this may be agnostic of the BCMA-directed modality. Lower BL sBCMA was also associated with higher complete response (CR) rate ( &lt; CR vs ≥CR) in the ide-cel arm ( P= 0.0038). Additionally, lower BL sBCMA levels in the ide-cel arm were associated with lower grade (gr) of CRS (gr 0–1 vs 2 vs ≥3; P= 0.0022) and iiNT (gr 0–1 vs ≥2; P= 0.0113); however, overlapping ranges may limit predictive utility. Further analyses will be presented. In the ide-cel arm, landmark mPFS was longer in pts with undetectable versus detectable sBCMA at 2 mo post infusion (16.3 vs 5.2 mo; HR, 0.26) or at 6 mo (16.8 vs 9.6 mo; HR, 0.62). Furthermore, landmark mPFS was also longer in pts with MRD negativity versus pts with positive/indeterminate MRD status at 6 mo (17.2 vs 5.8 mo; HR, 0.288) or at 12 mo (13.8 vs 4.6 mo; HR, 0.121). Conclusions: BL sBCMA levels correlated with response and CRS and iiNT grade in the ide-cel arm of KarMMa-3, potentially reinforcing the importance of management of BL tumor burden for optimal response to ide-cel. Early clearance of sBCMA at 2 mo, sustained clearance of sBCMA at 6 mo, and MRD negativity at 6 or 12 mo, regardless of clinical response, may be useful biomarkers for identifying pts likely to achieve a complete and durable response to ide-cel. Clinical trial information: NCT03651128 .