tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Abstract P381: Vascular Inflammation as a Subclinical Marker of Atherosclerosis Demonstrates High Cardiometabolic Risk in a Resource-limited, Community-based Population
Authors: Joshua P Rivers, Valerie Mitchell, Marlene Peters-Lawrence, Aditya A Joshi, Amit K Dey, Nehal N Mehta, Tiffany M Powell-Wiley
Journal: Circulation (2017)

Background: Vascular inflammation (VI) is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) events among populations with inflammatory disease. Less is known about VI among populations in communities characterized by lower neighborhood-level socioeconomic status and limited resources for physical activity and dietary intake, particularly those identified as having CV risk factors through community-based (CB) efforts. Specifically, no comparisons exist of VI between CB cohorts and populations with known inflammatory disease associated with CV risk, such as psoriasis (PSO). Hypothesis: We hypothesized that VI by 18-FDG PET/CT would be similar in a resource limited CB cohort compared to a matched mild/moderate PSO cohort. Methods: In the Washington, DC CV Health and Needs Assessment, we evaluated CV risk factors among participants of a day-long, CB event in resource-limited Washington, DC areas (NCT01927783). Those having at least one CV risk factor (obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or diabetes) underwent 18-FDG PET/CT to measure VI for cardiometabolic phenotyping. Cardiometabolic markers were compared between the CB cohort and PSO cohort; VI between the cohorts was also compared using linear regression modeling. Results: The CB cohort was African-American, middle-aged, and predominantly female, and the PSO cohort was half female and mostly Caucasian. Both cohorts were obese and pre-hypertensive with elevated lipid levels. There was no significant difference in VI between the CB cohort and the PSO cohort in both unadjusted (beta 0.25, p 0.15) and adjusted models including age, BMI, and race (beta 0.21, p 0.14). Conclusion: Populations with CV risk factors in resource-limited communities have comparable VI to those with known inflammatory PSO. These findings highlight a need for 1) CB efforts to identify individuals at high CV risk who might not otherwise be seen in a clinical setting and 2) targeted CB interventions to reduce CV risk for these populations. However, larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Preventing Scientific Fraud
Authors: Eugene Garfield, Marie McVeigh, Marion Muff
Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine (2006)

Letters19 September 2006Preventing Scientific FraudEugene Garfield, PhD, Marie McVeigh, MS, and Marion MuffEugene Garfield, PhDFrom Thomson Scientific, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Search for more papers by this author, Marie McVeigh, MSFrom Thomson Scientific, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Search for more papers by this author, and Marion MuffFrom Thomson Scientific, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-145-6-200609190-00018 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail TO THE EDITOR: The recent article about the importance of integrating retraction notices with their original reports (1) noted their treatment in PubMed but not the procedures followed in the Science Citation Index (SCI), the electronic version of which is included in the Web of Science.Ever since the SCI was launched in the 1960s, it has indexed published retractions. In each case, a citation link was established between the retraction, that is, “correction,” and the original source article. To find retractions, like all other corrections, all one had to do was conduct a cited reference search based on the ...Reference1. Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:609-13. [PMID: 16522625] LinkGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: From Thomson Scientific, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Disclosures: All of the authors are connected to the purveyor of the Science Citation Index and Web of Science. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoResearch Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case Harold C. Sox and Drummond Rennie Preventing Scientific Fraud Dominique R. Garrel , Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret , and Pierre Boyle Preventing Scientific Fraud Harold C. Sox and Drummond Rennie Preventing Scientific Fraud David W. Noble Metrics Cited ByAnalysis of Citations to Biomedical Articles Affected by Scientific Misconduct 19 September 2006Volume 145, Issue 6Page: 472-473KeywordsConflicts of interestEmbryonic stem cellsScientific misconduct ePublished: 19 September 2006 Issue Published: 19 September 2006 CopyrightCopyright © 2006 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF DownloadLoading ...
JAMA Psychiatry
Authors: Phil Fontanarosa, Annette Flanagin, Brenda Gregoline, Tracy Frey, Miriam Cintron, Kevin Brown, Amanda Ehrhardt, Paul Ruich, Suzanne Walker, Connie Manno, Sara Billings, Timothy Gray, Catherine Copyreaders, Stephanie Alden, Jane Beckmeyer, Jan Calayag, Mary Clavey, Paula Coerver-Connolly, Laura Glitman, Brandy King, Donna Patton, Editorial Thordsen, Wanda Assistant, Larry Bryant, Monica Mungle, Elaine Williams, Fanny Brown, Lenette Gardner-Gullens, Erin Kato, Peter Kim, Rachell Lozano, Michaela Mark, Caroline Sietmann, Elizabeth Scientifi, Michael Berkwits, Michelle Kurzynski, Eric Butkus, Carrie Butt, Mary Ferkaluk, Daniel Morrow, Reuben Rios, Ronna Henry, Karen Bucher, Andy Rekito, Emily Ling, David Song, Deputy Livingston, Thomas Cole, Marla Hall, Deanna Willis, Yolanda Davis, Joseph Thornton, Deanna Bellandi, Jim Periodical, Thomas Easley, Brian Shields, Karen Adams-Taylor, Monica Smith, Jeff Ery, J Bonistalli, Kathy Russell, Mirna Monal, Stacey Mchugh, Marketing Thornbury, Tricia Classifi, Thalia Moss, Susan Henning, Tiff Stevenson, Saskia Bolore, Gretchen Linder, Brian Mccartney, Christine Hearne, Rebecca Staff, David Baum, Natasha Nekola, Ron Marketing, Paul Gee, Matt Herron, Elizabeth Solaro, Geoff Rey Flick, Rick Bell, Fergus Clare, Lindsay Dawson, Will English, Ellen Gibson, Mustafa Ishaq, Craig Mccaff Rey, Michael Mcgraw, Daniel Pickhardt, Romando Rossini, Stacy Business, Analyst Sirisha, Alluri Staff, Millette Jackson-Bates, Karl Elvin, Nancy Essex, Jaye Mize, Sean O'donnell, Sue Managers, David Antos, Chris Borden, Debbie Camp, Lydia Cruz, Scott Curl, Diane Darnell, Jordynn Farrar, Colleen Kelly, Chris Meyer, Annemarie Neff, J Neff, Sean Ohlson, Phil O'leary, Bill Pedone, Susan Price, Benita Shah, Denise Steinhauser, Erin Van Dusen, Joe Advertising, Production Services, Kim Boler, Rhonda Brown, Fin Carter, Daniel Degroot, Shawn Hansen, Euwanaha Joiner-Smith, Joshua Lane, Cindy Rendlen, Ellen Yoshihara, Circulation Services, Julie Burton, Noemi Rivera, Mary Sieck, Sarah Subramanian, Geneine Van, Someren Composition, New Media, Gail Barrett, Regina Brownlee, Amanda Camino, Brenda Chandler-Grayer, Emily Dunn, Amy Evers, Teri Hutchison, Mary Kuranda, Joshua Lampinen, Nathan Mitre, Patricia Panek, La Son, Diggs Sledge, George Thomson Graphics, Joe Amft, Maria Duda, Fred Furtner, Carolyn Hall, Maria Kowalkowski, Proofreading Carol, Joy Farrell, Daniel James, Judith Literskis, Teresa Omiotek, Michael Ryder, James Madara, Bernard Hengesbaugh, Dan Blazer, North Carolina, David Braff, La Jolla, Stephen California, Washington Dager, Atlanta Druss, Susan Georgia, New Essock, New York, Ellen York, James Frank, Maryland Harris, S Kenneth, Virginia Kendler, C Ronald, Kathleen Kessler, Maryland Merikangas, Judith Samples O'malley, Maryland Rapoport, F Charles, Myrna Reynolds, New Weissman, Charles York, St Zorumski, Shitij Kapur, Michael Owen, Fmed Sci, Naomi Wray, Roy Grinker Sr, Daniel Freedman, Jack Barchas, Joseph Coyle, Jennifer Urbano Blackford, Tennessee Deputy, Martin Paulus, Christine Konradi, Helena Chmura Kraemer, Palo Alto, Howard Bauchner
Journal: JAMA Psychiatry (2017)
The first successful clinical case of a novel catheter-based coronary artery bypass procedure: Percutaneous in-situ coronary venous arterialization Nicolaus Reifart, Eugen Hauptmann, Alan Yeung, Motoya Hayase, Stephen N. Oesterle. Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Bruder, Trier, Germany, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Journal: Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2001)
Use of the medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders
Authors: J. R. Curtis
Journal: JAMA (1995)

<h3>Objective.</h3> —To describe the use of the medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders written for medical inpatients. <h3>Design.</h3> —Structured interviews with medical residents. <h3>Methods.</h3> —Second- and third-year internal medicine residents (n=44) were telephoned weekly and briefly interviewed about each patient who received a DNAR order in the preceding week. <h3>Setting.</h3> —Two university-affiliated hospitals: a veterans affairs medical center and a municipal hospital. <h3>Patients.</h3> —One hundred forty-five medical inpatients for whom DNAR orders were written during their hospitalization. <h3>Results.</h3> —Residents stated that the medical futility rationale applied for 91 patients (63%), but this rationale was invoked independent of patient or surrogate choice for only 17 patients (12%). Of the 91 patients for whom futility applied, both quantitative futility (low probability of success) and qualitative futility (poor quality of life if cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] were performed) applied to 45 (49%), quantitative futility alone to 30 (33%), and qualitative futility alone to 16 (18%). Residents report that they discussed resuscitation issues with all communicative patients for whom the medical futility rationale was invoked. Among patients for whom quantitative futility applied, residents'predictions of the probability that patients would survive to hospital discharge after CPR varied from 0% (for 60% of patients) to 75%. For 32% of these patients, residents predicted survival at 5% or more. Logistic regression modeling showed that the presence of organ failure (odds ratio [OR], 8.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3 to 23.9), the residents' estimates of the probability of surviving CPR (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88 to 0.99), and nonwhite race (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 6.3) were associated with the determination of quantitative futility. In one third of the cases where qualitative futility applied, residents made the judgment of qualitative futility without discussing quality of life with communicative patients. Logistic regression modeling showed immobility (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 9.0) and age ≥75 years (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.8) to be associated with the determination of qualitative futility. <h3>Conclusions.</h3> —While residents did not appear to use the medical futility rationale to avoid discussing DNAR issues with patients, we found evidence of important misunderstandings of the concepts of both quantitative and qualitative futility. If the futility rationale is to be applied to withholding or withdrawing medical interventions, practice guidelines for its use should be developed, and education about medical futility must be incorporated into medical school, residency training, and continuing medical education programs. (<i>JAMA</i>. 1995;273:124-128)
The Lipoprivic Control of Feeding Is Governed by Fat Metabolism, Not by Leptin or Adipose Depletion
Authors: Bryan D. Hudson, Alan J. Emanuel, Michael F. Wiater, Sue Ritter
Journal: Endocrine Reviews (2010)

Main Outcome Measures: IGF-I, IGFBP-3, resting energy expenditure, and fat oxidation were quantified by indirect calorimetry.We measured whole body leucine turnover from which leucine rate of appearance and leucine incorporation into protein were estimated.Results: GH significantly stimulated all outcome measures.During GH treatment, addition of R significantly reduced mean IGF-I but not IGFBP-3, whereas E 2 reduced both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels.Cotreatment with R but not E 2 significantly attenuated the stimulatory effects of GH on fat oxidation.There was a strong trend (P ϭ 0.08) toward a greater reduction in leucine incorporation into protein after R compared to E 2 cotreatment.Conclusions: The modulatory effects of E 2 and R at therapeutic doses on GH action are different.R during GH therapy exerts a greater inhibitory effect on lipid oxidation and protein anabolism compared to E 2 . Effect of Glucagon-LikePeptide-1 on ␣and ␤-Cell Function in C-Peptide-Negative Type 1 Diabetic Patients
Der elektrische Faktor der Nierenarbeit.
Journal: JAMA (1933)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Style analysis: Carlyle
Authors: L. S. King
Journal: JAMA (1968)

Very few now read Carlyle for pleasure. Most do so only under the spur of an "assignment," as in a college literature course. Yet once we get used to his striking peculiarities, we can recognize him as one of the great masters of English prose. For many years in my medical-writing seminars, I have given excerpts from Carlyle, without indicating the authorship (and in five years no student has guessed correctly). I have then asked whether we were dealing with good writing or bad writing. Invariably, the majority considered it bad writing and did not like it, although an occasional hardy soul expressed pleasure and appreciation. But after we analyzed the excerpts with considerable care, the class almost unanimously felt that the writing really was strong, impressive, and<i>good</i>. A liking for Carlyle is an acquired taste. Most people find his prose at first rather repulsive, somewhat comparable to the
In Step
Authors: Nicolas Dalton
Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine (1992)

Ad Libitum1 November 1992In StepNicolas DaltonNicolas DaltonSearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-117-9-792 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ExcerptI follow footsteps, the old dead, strickenby the unchanging likeness of the shoreand a moon in perpetual eclipse.The sea, caught between tides, cathartic floodtides or tides of blood, beats solemn and flawed.In step, I draw the same difficult breath,barely in and out, but not out of step,timepiece for the long forgotten. The tockof heart against lung hovers, fails, repeatsitself in expected revolutions,a crow's spiral at the revelationof carrion. The footsteps of the olddead plot a course etched in sun-fused sand, bonedry,brittle and temple deep, safe onlyas... This content is PDF only. To continue reading please click on the PDF icon. Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: New York, NY 10025 PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics 1 November 1992Volume 117, Issue 9Page: 792-792KeywordsBloodHeartLungs ePublished: 1 December 2008 Issue Published: 1 November 1992 PDF downloadLoading ...
QUININ IN PNEUMONIA.
Journal: JAMA (1906)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Errors in Table 2 and Table 3
Authors: Karlo Lizarraga, Philip Thompson, Anthony Lang, Edmond Safra, Gloria Shulman
Journal: JAMA Neurology (2019)

Kimberley J. Smith, PhD; Mark D. Peterson, PhD; Neil E. O’Connell, PhD; Christina Victor, PhD; Silvia Liverani, PhD; Nana Anokye, PhD; Jennifer M. Ryan, PhD
Symposium on Diet, Nutrition, and Health
Journal: JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (1987)

Journal Article Symposium on Diet, Nutrition, and Health Get access JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Volume 78, Issue 1, January 1987, Page 195, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/78.1.195-f Published: 01 January 1987
Donor Policies for Stem Cell Transplantation
Authors: Douglas Hirsch Tischler
Journal: JAMA (2010)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Highlights
Journal: JAMA (2015)

Acute kidney injury is a recognized complication after cardiac surgery.In a randomized trial involving 240 patients who were at high risk of acute kidney injury and undergoing cardiac surgery, Zarbock and colleagues found that remote ischemic preconditioning-3 cycles of 5-minute ischemia and 5-minute reperfusion in 1 upper arm performed by blood pressure cuff infl ation after induction of anesthesia-compared with no ischemic preconditioning signifi cantly reduced the rate of acute kidney injury.In an Editorial, Pan and Sheikh-Hamad discuss ischemic preconditioning-mediated organ protection.
Contact Eczema from Industrial Use of Hydrazine Derivatives with Group Hypersensitivity to Hydralazine (Apresoline) and Isoniazid (INH)
Journal: JAMA (1963)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Mandatory National Health Service
Authors: M. Boyd Gillespie
Journal: JAMA (1993)

<h3>To the Editor.</h3> —The Editorial by Dr Johns<sup>1</sup>is an important reminder to the health care task force that the success of any reform depends ultimately on the people who will implement it. Currently there are too few general practitioners in areas of need to enact a program that emphasizes primary care, preventive medicine, and public health. Johns' proposal for a National Health Service Corps (NHSC) is one answer to this problem. A government that is serious about health care reform will reinforce the rhetoric with financial incentives such as tuition debt relief, which encourages students to choose training in primary care. Leaders of America's top medical schools are likely to support the idea of a NHSC because it allows them to sidestep the problem of primary care. Institutions like Johns Hopkins will not feel obliged to promote primary care to the same degree as specialization and research because
Marriages
Journal: JAMA (1929)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal