tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Manual of Physiology.
Journal: JAMA (1899)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Does Aflatoxin Exposure in the United Kingdom Constitute a Cancer Risk?
Authors: Joanne C. Harrison, Magda Carvajal, R. Colin Garner
Journal: Environmental Health Perspectives (1993)

Although the aflatoxins were discovered more than 30 years ago, there is still considerable controversy surrounding their human health effects. Most countries have introduced legislation to control the level of aflatoxins in food, but it is not known if these permitted levels still pose a significant cancer risk. Furthermore, it is unlikely that all the sources of human aflatoxin exposure have been discovered, nor if the liver is the only, or indeed, major target organ for aflatoxin-induced cancer in man. In our laboratory we have used both immunological and HPLC methods to examine human DNA from a variety of tissues and organs to identify and quantify aflatoxin DNA-adducts. We have already detected aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)-DNA adducts in formalin-fixed tissue from an acute poisoning incident in Southeast Asia. Here we have examined human colon and rectum DNA from normal and tumorous tissue obtained from cancer patients and colon, liver, pancreas, breast, and cervix DNA from autopsy specimens. AFB1-DNA adducts were detected in all tissue types examined and ranged from 0-60 adducts/10(6) nucleotides. Where sample size allowed, the adduct levels were confirmed by HPLC analysis. Tumor tissues tended to have higher adduct levels than normal tissue from the same individual, and levels generally increased with patient age. In samples analyzed by HPLC, the adducts present had the chromatographic properties of [8,9-dihydro-8-(N5-formyl)-2',5',6'-triamino-4'-oxo-(N5-pyramidyl) -9- hydroxy-aflatoxin B1, the ring-opened form of the AFB1-guanine adduct.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy.
Journal: BMJ (1980)

a patielnt with newly acquired right bundle-branch block?Though its appearance suggests the possibility of heart disease it is not specifically related to any condition.A simple history and examination should show up any apparent under- lying cardiovascular disease needing treatment.Regular follow-up is justified; but in the absence of any other clinically evident cardiovascular abnormality patients should not have their activities restricted, nor should they need invasive investigation.
Doctors — Entre Nous. Short Stories.
Journal: JAMA (1922)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Two gentlemen of Tortola
Authors: W. C. Gibson
Journal: JAMA (1978)

THE HAUNTING beauty of the British Virgin Islands, located less than 160 km east of Puerto Rico, is well known to yachtsmen. Less well known is the fact that two remarkable physicians of Quaker descent were born on these islands in the 18th century—William Thornton (1759 to 1828) (Fig 1), who was born on Tortola, once "white with cotton" and lush with sugarcane, and John Coakley Lettsom (1744 to 1815) (Fig 2), who first saw the light of day on Tortola's near neighbor, Little Jost Van Dyke Island (cover). <h3>William Thornton</h3> William Thornton, whose life can be summarized more briefly than that of the older and more distinguished practitioner Lettsom, was born in Pleasant Valley, which reaches the coast at Road Town, where Sir Francis Drake is known to have anchored ship. After completing his medical training at Edinburgh, Thornton returned to Tortola to practice medicine briefly before going to
Endoscopy free papers 140-149
Authors: S Parry, J Barton, M Welfare, I Mohammed, L Cherkas, S Riley, T Spector, N Trudgill, S Lal, J Mclaughlin, G Giampaolo, G Dockray, A Varro, D Thompson, J Jones, D Kendall, P Millns, C Hawkey, S Dunlop, D Jenkins, R Spiller, L Gregory, L Yaguez, S Coen, E Amaro, S Smale, A Hobson, S Williams, Q Aziz, V Chudleigh, E Brennan, S Tarry, S Myers, S Lewis, G Smith, K Palmer, Z Khan, E Simpson, A Cole, I Macdonald, D Pye, A Austin, J Freeman
Journal: Gut (2002)

Introduction: Previous studies, many uncontrolled, suggest 4 to 32% of people develop irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) after ID.Little information is available on the development of other FGIDs after ID.Aim: To determine if patients with stool culture confirmed bacterial diarrhoea were more likely to develop gut symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of IBS, functional dyspepsia or functional diarrhoea at 3 and 6 month follow up compared with community controls.Methods: A prospective community-based case-control study over one year.Subjects with stool positive bacterial infectious diarrhoea and control subjects from the same primary care practice were invited to participate.The presence or not of IBS, functional dyspepsia or functional diarrhoea was diagnosed at the start and at follow up using self-complete Rome II modular questionnaires.The diagnosis of a baseline FGID excluded subjects from continuing.There were 128 cases and 219 community controls eligible and who consented to participate.Results: At follow up there was a higher incidence of FGIDs in the cases compared with controls, mainly due to a higher incidence of IBS (see table ).There was no difference in the incidence of functional dyspepsia between cases and controls.Conclusions: IBS and functional diarrhoea is diagnosed more frequently in people at three and six-month follow up after an episode of stool positive bacterial diarrhoea compared with community controls despite careful exclusion of people with pre-existing FGIDS and adds further support for the concept of post-infectious IBS.
Prevalence of Chlamydial and Gonococcal Infections Among Young Adults—Correction
Authors: Hao Deng, Weidong Le, Joseph Jankovic
Journal: JAMA (2004)

peats expansion (57 CTG/CAG repeats) of JPH3 (HDL2) in the same patient, while a family member with full mutation of FMR1 and trinucleotide expansion of JPH3 showed no symptom of parkinsonism.Comment.Premutation of the FMR1 gene in men is associated with various movement disorders, including tremor, ataxia, and parkinsonism, that have clinical features overlapping with PD and essential tremor. 1,6We sought premutations in men with PD and in those with essential tremor to determine whether these 2 disorders are pathogenetically related to this genetic abnormality, but we found no FMR1 premutation in our population of patients with PD and essential tremor.This is consistent with other reports indicating lack of FMR1 premutation in patients with essential tremor, 7,8 atypical parkinsonism, and ataxias. 8Thus, premutation of FMR1 probably plays little or no role in the pathogenesis of idiopathic PD or essential tremor.Furthermore, it is unlikely that this genetic abnormality accounts for the male preponderance in patients with PD. 9
In Vitro and in Vivo Changes in Human Complement Caused by Silage
Authors: Stephen A. Olenchock, John J. May, David S. Pratt, Daniel M. Lewis, Judith C. Mull, Lorann Stallones
Journal: Environmental Health Perspectives (1986)

Aqueous extracts of silage samples from four farms in up-state New York were reacted in vitro with normal human serum. Hemolytic levels of complement component C3 were consumed in a dose-dependent fashion, and the four extracts differed in their relative activity rankings. Studies with chelated serum indicate that the alternative complement pathway is involved in the activation, and the active fragment C3b was demonstrated. Serum levels of hemolytic C3 and C4 in vivo were quantified before and after farmers performed their normal silo unloading operations. Although the study groups were small, suggestive evidence of in vivo complement consumption was found. IgE-related allergy did not appear to be of significance to the study groups. Complement activation may be an initiator of or contributor to adverse reactions in farmers who are exposed to airborne silage dusts.
Carcinogenic Effects of Adsorbates of Raw and Finished Water Supplies
Journal: JAMA (1963)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
POS0506 TENOSYNOVITIS HAS A HIGH SENSITIVITY FOR EARLY ACPA-POSITIVE AND ACPA-NEGATIVE RA: A LARGE CROSS-SECTIONAL MRI STUDY
Authors: X. Matthijssen, F. Wouters, N. Sidhu, E. Niemantsverdriet, A. van der Helm - van Mil
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2021)

Background: Clinically evident tenosynovitis can be seen in established Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Imaging research has recently shown that tenosynovitis at small joints occurs in early RA, contributes to typical RA symptoms (including joint swelling) and is infrequent in healthy controls. Imaging-detectable tenosynovitis is often not recognizable at joint examination, hence its prevalence can therefore be underestimated. Objectives: We hypothesized that if MRI-detectable tenosynovitis is a true RA-feature, the sensitivity for RA is high, in both ACPA-positive and -negative RA, and lower in other diseases that are associated with enthesitis (such as Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)). So far, no large MRI-study addressed these questions. Methods: Consecutive early arthritis patients (n=1211) from one health-care region underwent contrast-enhanced 1.5T MRI of hand and foot at diagnosis. MRIs were scored for synovitis and tenosynovitis by two readers blinded for clinical data. All included patients with ACPA-positive RA (n=250), ACPA-negative RA (n=282), PsA (n=88), SpA with peripheral arthritis (n=24), reactive arthritis (n=30) and self-limiting undifferentiated arthritis (UA;n=76) were studied. Sensitivity was calculated. Results: The sensitivity of tenosynovitis in RA was 85%; 88% for ACPA-positive RA and 82% for and ACPA-negative RA (p=0.19). The sensitivity for RA was significantly higher than for PsA (65%;p=0.001), SpA (53%;p&lt;0.001), reactive arthritis (36%;p&lt;0.001) and self-limiting UA (42%;p&lt;0.001). The observed sensitivity of MRI-synovitis was 91% in RA and ranged 83-54% in the other groups. Conclusion: MRI-detected tenosynovitis has a high sensitivity for early ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA. This supports both juxta-articular (tenosynovitis) and intra-articular synovial involvement is characteristic for RA. Figure 1. Presence of tenosynovitis (in black) in wrist MCPs and MTPs, in rheumatoid arthritis, stratified for ACPA-status and compared to other diseases Legend: RA: Rheumatoïd arthritis; ACPA: anti-citrullinated protein antibodies; UA: undifferentiated arthritis Disclosure of Interests: None declared
Rat strain differences in the ectopic osteogenic potential of recombinant human BMP adenoviruses
Authors: J Li
Journal: Molecular Therapy (2003)

Different animal strains have different genetic backgrounds that influence their physiological function and pathological process. The differences in genetic background may affect the efficiency of adenoviral infection and target gene expression and further cause different gene therapy results when target genes are delivered with adenoviral vectors. In this study, ectopic bone was not seen in ADCMVBMP4 injection sites, but was formed in ADCMVBMP9 injection sites in all rat strains. The mean volumes of bone induced with ADCMVBMP9 were 0.87 ± 0.2 cm3 in Wistar, 0.26 ± 0.1 cm3 in Long-Evans, 0.34 ± 0.2 cm3 in Sprague-Dawley, 0.44 ± 0.1 cm3 in ACI, 0.66 ± 0.2 cm3 in PVG, and 0.58 ± 0.1 cm3 in Fischer344 rats. This indicates that ADCMVBMP9 has different bone formation potentials in different immunocompetent rat strains (P = 0.02). The basic levels of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in blood before viral infection and titers of adenoviral neutralizing antibodies 30 days post-viral infection were significantly different among rat strains (P < 0.01). The efficiencies of target gene expression delivered with adenovirus were also significantly different in primary muscle cell cultures from different rat strains (P < 0.01). The different osteogenic potentials of ADCMVBMP9 among rat strains may be, in part, due to the differences in immune factors and target gene expression efficiency in muscle tissue.
Autos and Anesthesia Don't Mix
Journal: JAMA (1995)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
P2.13-43 Phase 1 Study of the Anti-HER3 Antibody Drug Conjugate U3-1402 in Metastatic or Unresectable EGFR-Mutant NSCLC
Authors: P. Jänne, H. Yu, M. Johnson, C. Steuer, M. Vigliotti, N. Shipitofsky, F.M. Guevara, S. Chen, C. Yu
Journal: Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2018)
Changes in liver membrane potentials after partial hepatectomy in rats
Authors: X ZHANG
Journal: Hepatology (1996)

Changes in potential differences (PD) across hepatocyte membranes after partial hepatectomy may play an important role in hepatic homeostatic mechanisms and regenerative activity. To date, few studies have attempted to describe the extent and duration of such changes. In the present study, we documented PD values immediately before and for a 24-hour period after a partial hepatectomy (PHx) of 70% in healthy adult rats. We also documented PD changes after 30% and 90% PHx and PD values in different lobes of the same liver before and after PHx. Our findings showed that the liver depolarizes promptly (within 5 minutes of PHx) and that changes in PD are sustained for approximately 18 hours before returning to baseline values. We also observed that the magnitude of hepatic depolarization correlates with the extent of PHx. Finally, we did not observe regional differences in PD recordings from various lobes before and after PHx. These findings enhance our understanding of the physiological changes that occur in regenerating livers after PHx in rats.
Apparent failures of endocarditis prophylaxis. Analysis of 52 cases submitted to a national registry
Authors: D. T. Durack
Journal: JAMA (1983)

Fifty-two cases of apparent endocarditis prophylaxis failure were reported to a national registry established by the American Heart Association (AHA). Mitral valve prolapse was the single most common underlying cardiac lesion (17 cases, 33%), followed by various congenital abnormalities (15 cases, 29%) and rheumatic heart disease (11 cases, 21%). Ten patients (19%) had prosthetic valve endocarditis. Forty-eight cases (92%) occurred after a dental procedure. Symptoms began within two weeks after the procedure suspected to have caused endocarditis in 50% and within five weeks in 79%. Thirty-nine cases (75%) were caused by viridans streptococci and seven (14%) by<i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. Most patients received oral penicillin as prophylaxis. Only six patients (12%) received regimens currently recommended by the AHA. In 27 (63%) of the 43 cases for which antimicrobial susceptibility data were available, the infecting microorganism was sensitive to the antibiotic(s) used for prophylaxis. After diagnosis of endocarditis, the prognosis for bacteriologic cure was good; 47 patients (90%) were cured, of whom seven underwent valve replacement. These data indicate that endocarditis prophylaxis failures may be more common than was previously believed and that failures occur even when the infecting organism is susceptible to the antibiotics used. Most antimicrobial regimens used in patients with prophylaxis failures did not conform to current recommendations. (<i>JAMA</i>1983;250:2318-2322)
Seudoartrosis
Journal: JAMA (1952)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Kinsey
Journal: JAMA (2005)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Serums and Vaccines in Influenza
Journal: JAMA (2020)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal