tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
“GINA 2015: the latest iteration of a magnificent journey.” Jean Bousquet and Marc Humbert. <i>Eur Respir J</i> 2015; 46: 579–582.
Authors: Laurent Savale, Caroline Sattler, Sven Günther, David Montani, Marie-Camille Chaumais, Swanny Perrin, Xavier Jaïs, Andrei Seferian, Roland Jovan, Sophie Bulifon, Florence Parent, Gérald Simonneau, Marc Humbert
Journal: European Respiratory Journal (2015)
The Suicide-Rate of San Diego
Journal: JAMA (1913)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Boston Medical Library
Authors: Walter G. Phippen
Journal: New England Journal of Medicine (1950)

REPORT OF THE PRESIDENTI am happy to submit my fourth annual report as president of the Boston Medical Library. The Library, I am pleased to say, still continues to make progress toward its ultimate goal as a central research and reference library. This year has been devoted to cleaning house and clearing up. Many duplicate books have been sold, and many more removed to the Deposit Library. Indeed, the Librarian tells me that all our space there is now occupied. This is a costly business — $2000 a year — but necessary until our stacks are completed; $2000 a . . .
Site-Specific Data Confirm Arsenic Exposure Predicted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Authors: Susan Walker, Susan Griffin
Journal: Environmental Health Perspectives (1998)

The EPA uses an exposure assessment model to estimate daily intake to chemicals of potential concern. At the Anaconda Superfund site in Montana, the EPA exposure assessment model was used to predict total and speciated urinary arsenic concentrations. Predicted concentrations were then compared to concentrations measured in children living near the site. When site-specific information on concentrations of arsenic in soil, interior dust, and diet, site-specific ingestion rates, and arsenic absorption rates were used, measured and predicted urinary arsenic concentrations were in reasonable agreement. The central tendency exposure assessment model successfully described the measured urinary arsenic concentration for the majority of children at the site. The reasonable maximum exposure assessment model successfully identified the uppermost exposed population. While the agreement between measured and predicted urinary arsenic is good, it is not exact. The variables that were identified which influenced agreement included soil and dust sample collection methodology, daily urinary volume, soil ingestion rate, and the ability to define the exposure unit. The concentration of arsenic in food affected agreement between measured and predicted total urinary arsenic, but was not considered when comparing measured and predicted speciated urinary arsenic. Speciated urinary arsenic is the recommended biomarker for recent inorganic arsenic exposure. By using site-specific data in the exposure assessment model, predicted risks from exposure to arsenic were less than predicted risks would have been if the EPA's default values had been used in the exposure assessment model. This difference resulted in reduced magnitude and cost of remediation while still protecting human health.
New calls for proposals in the field of health launched by the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers
Authors: Collective Eurosurveillance editorial team
Journal: Eurosurveillance (2011)

Preview this article: New calls for proposals in the field of health launched by the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/eurosurveillance/16/10/art19811-en-1.gif
Manual of Bacteriology.
Journal: JAMA (1899)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Splenosis: A Sequel to Traumatic Rupture of the Spleen
Journal: JAMA (1963)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Die Irrtümer der Psychoanalyse: Eine Irrlehre mit einem genialen Kern
Journal: JAMA (1935)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Hemophilus influenzae type b disease. An epidemiologic study with special reference to day-care centers
Authors: S. R. Redmond
Journal: JAMA (1984)

Day-care centers are a relatively new phenomena of American society that bring together large numbers of young children susceptible to contagious disease. This study examines the incidence and risk factors of endemic Hemophilus influenzae type b disease both in the general population and in day-care attendees in Monroe County, New York, for 1982 and 1983. The attack rate in the general population (excluding day-care attendees) was highest in children younger than 1 year (131.9 cases per 100,000 per year) and in those 1 to 2 years old (75.7 cases per 100,000 per year) compared with older children. The relative risk for day-care attendees was much greater than that of the general population. It was 12.3 times greater for children younger than 1 year, 7.2 times greater for those 1 to 2 years old, and 3.8 times greater for those 2 to 3 years old. We conclude that children attending day-care facilities face a substantial increased risk of contracting invasive H influenzae type b disease. Efforts to prevent susceptibility and contagious spread of this disease in this population seem necessary.
THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY AS A PRETEXT FOR COMPULSORY HEALTH INSURANCE
Journal: JAMA (1941)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
The Fourth Mental Measurements Yearbook
Journal: JAMA (1953)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Reporter Gene Assay for Fish-Killing Activity Produced by Pfiesteria piscicida
Authors: Elizabeth R. Fairey, J. Stewart G. Edmunds, Nora J. Deamer-Melia, Howard Glasgow, Frank M. Johnson, Peter R. Moeller, JoAnn M. Burkholder, John S. Ramsdell
Journal: Environmental Health Perspectives (1999)

Collaborative studies were performed to develop a functional assay for fish-killing activity produced by Pfiesteria piscicida. Eight cell lines were used to screen organic fractions and residual water fraction by using a 3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazol-(2-4)]-diphenyltetrazolium bromide cytotoxicity assay. Diethyl ether and a residual water fraction were cytotoxic to several cell lines including rat pituitary (GH(4)C(1)) cells. Residual water as well as preextracted culture water containing P. piscicida cells induced c-fos-luciferase expressed in GH(4)C(1) cells with a rapid time course of induction and sensitive detection. The reporter gene assay detected activity in toxic isolates of P. piscicida from several North Carolina estuaries in 1997 and 1998 and may also be suitable for detecting toxic activity in human and animal serum.
Winter Cholera and Hog Cholera.
Journal: JAMA (1884)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Diagnostic Standards and Classification of Tuberculosis
Journal: JAMA (1952)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Airway... Instantly
Authors: Francis L. Weille
Journal: JAMA (1975)

<h3>To the Editor.—</h3> Otolaryngologists would agree with the author that his technique will certainly produce an "instant airway." Unfortunately, the technique described ensures the production of subglottic stenosis because of damage to the conus elasticus due to the unavoidable scarring when the surgical wound heals. It is true that the incision advocated lies inferior to the level of the true vocal cords, but tentlike membrane that descends as the conus elasticus inferior to the true cords to attach at the cricoid ring will be damaged. I have seen this happen. It is for this reason that "low" tracheotomy through the third, fourth, and fifth rings of the trachea is standard procedure for most laryngologists. Incidentally, the cricothyroid branch of the superior thyroid artery can be damaged on one or both sides by the incision described by the author since this vessel runs transversally across the cricothyroid membrane to communicate with
A comparison of Western European and US University hospitals. A case report from Leuven, West Berlin, Leiden, London, and San Francisco
Authors: S. A. Schroeder
Journal: JAMA (1984)

To assess how closely US university hospitals resemble those in other Western countries, I compared four major European university hospitals— Leuven, Belgium; Klinikum Steglitz, West Berlin; Leiden, the Netherlands; and St Thomas', London—with a US institution—University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). University of California had 1.6 to 2.4 more total employees, 1.1 to 1.7 more registered nurses, 2.1 to 8.5 more staff physicians, and 1.5 to 3.0 more house officers per adjusted occupied bed. University of California's costs per bed were 2.2 to 3.5 times higher, its inclusive per diem charges at least four times higher, and its malpractice premium at least 50 times greater. Medical patients at UCSF and West Berlin were more severely ill, as judged by organ system failure, need for organ system support, and levels of consciousness. Compared with UCSF, the European hospitals had more explicit rationing of care according to age and illness severity. Overall, European university hospitals are larger, less expensive, less technology intensive, staffed by fewer employees and physicians, occupied by less severely ill patients, and more apt to serve as regional referral centers. As US university hospitals move into a price-competitive era, they may come to resemble their European counterparts. (<i>JAMA</i>1984;252:240-246)
Highlights
Journal: JAMA Neurology (2020)

Medical Management vs Mechanical Thrombectomy for Mild Strokes 16Although mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care for anterior circulation acute large-vessel occlusion (LVO), it is not known whether MT benefits patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores less than 6.Goyal and colleagues evaluated 364 patients with mild deficits and acute LVO treated with MT or best medical management in a retrospective pooled multicenter study over a 5-year period.The patients treated with MT experienced higher odds of asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and lower rates of 3-month functional independence compared with patients treated with best medical management.In a meta-analysis that included 843 patients from 4 studies, MT was associated with higher odds of symptomatic ICH, but no other differences, suggesting a clinical trial in this patient population is warranted.
Vitiligo
Authors: J.S. Pegum
Journal: British Journal of Dermatology (1996)

Journal Article Vitiligo Get access J.S. Pegum J.S. Pegum The Primary, Langley Upper Green, Saffron Walden, Essex CB11 4RZ Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar British Journal of Dermatology, Volume 134, Issue 2, 1 February 1996, Page 373, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1996.tb07636.x Published: 01 February 1996
Public Expectations for Annual Physical Examination and Testing
Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine (2002)

Summaries for Patients7 May 2002Public Expectations for Annual Physical Examination and TestingSearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-136-9-200205070-00002 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail What is the problem and what is known about it so far?Guidelines for preventive health care recommend selected medical examinations and laboratory tests for adults at specific time intervals. The guidelines, which are drafted by expert medical panels after review of available research results, do not recommend comprehensive yearly checkups. However, many healthy American adults see doctors for yearly checkups.Why did the researchers do this particular study?The researchers wanted to learn what American adults think about yearly physical checkups and what they think should be done during these checkups. They also wanted to know whether these desires ... Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: The summary below is from the full report titled “Public Expectations and Attitudes for Annual Physical Examinations and Testing.” It is in the 7 May 2002 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 136, pages 652-659). The authors are SK Oboler, AV Prochazka, R Gonzales, S Xu, and RJ Anderson.Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoPublic Expectations and Attitudes for Annual Physical Examinations and Testing Sylvia K. Oboler , Allan V. Prochazka , Ralph Gonzales , Stanley Xu , and Robert J. Anderson Metrics 7 May 2002Volume 136, Issue 9Page: I-21KeywordsCancer screeningColorectal cancerComplete blood countHealth careHeartLaboratory testsMammographyMotivationPatientsRenal cancer ePublished: 7 May 2002 Issue Published: 7 May 2002 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2002 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...