tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Numeracy
Authors: Robert D. Blank
Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine (1998)

Letters1 May 1998NumeracyRobert D. Blank, MD, PhDRobert D. Blank, MD, PhDThe Hospital for Special Surgery; New York, NY 10021Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-128-9-199805010-00029 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail TO THE EDITOR:In their recent article, Schwartz and colleagues [1] raise the important issue of whether patients have sufficient quantitative reasoning ability to understand risk–benefit information about mammography. They show that women's ability to gauge their risks for breast cancer and potential benefit from mammography correlates with greater numeracy, as measured by a three-item questionnaire. It is hard to overstate the importance of this finding because it has profound implications for clinical practice and for our understanding of informed consent in this and other settings. The authors' findings lead naturally to another, even more disturbing question: How “numerate” are ...References1. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC, Welch HG. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127:966-72. Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: Robert D. Blank, MD, PhDAffiliations: The Hospital for Special Surgery; New York, NY 10021 PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics 1 May 1998Volume 128, Issue 9Page: 783KeywordsBreast cancerMammographyNumeracyQuestionnairesReasoning ePublished: 15 August 2000 Issue Published: 1 May 1998 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1998 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
Deaths
Journal: JAMA (1922)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
TBIO-29. PedcBioPortal, A CANCER DATA VISUALIZATION TOOL FOR INTEGRATIVE PEDIATRIC CANCER ANALYSES
Authors: Pichai Raman, Komal Rathi, Karthik Kalletla, Yuankun Zhu, Bo Zhang, Nikolaus Schultz, Ethan Cerami, Alan Mackay, Chris Jones, Sabine Mueller, Javad Nazarian, John M Maris, Phillip B Storm, Angela J Waanders, Adam C Resnick
Journal: Neuro-Oncology (2018)

The pediatric cancer genome is severely under-represented in genomic warehouses as existing data portals have primarily focused on adult malignancies. This is markedly more pronounced for pediatric brain tumor data as large-scale pediatric initiatives like TARGET do not capture these tumors. To address this unmet need, we have developed a new cancer visualization tool (http://pedcbioportal.org). PedcBioPortal is an instance of cBioPortal, supporting pan-cancer integrative analysis of published pediatric cancer data and consortia-based efforts including the Children’s Brain Tumor Tissue Consortium (CBTTC), the Pediatric NeuroOncology Consortium (PNOC), and the St. Baldrick’s Pediatric Stand Up 2 Cancer Dream Team. The aim of PedcBioPortal is to lower the barrier to large-scale pediatric and pan-cancer genomics analysis by providing rich visualizations and detailed statistics/summaries that integrate multi-dimensional datasets. Key functionalities include the ability to view genetic lesions along the genome, correlate genomic and clinical attributes, and obtain study level summary statistics. Importantly, clinical trials data, pharmacological agent information, pathology reports, and tissue images are all incorporated, demonstrating the platform’s ability to house both structured and unstructured data. Additionally, application program interfaces (APIs) supporting bioinformatics/data scientist access for large-scale analytics are available. PedcBioPortal is part of an evolving cloud-based ecosystem of applications dedicated to the empowered use of large-scale pediatric data that flows from biospecimen availability, to the processing of raw data, and finally to interpretation of summarized data. The cBioPortal software is developed and maintained by the cBio Consortium a multi-institutional team (http://www.cbioportal.org).
References and Reviews
Journal: JAMA (1967)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Journals JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2024 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Association News
Journal: JAMA (1935)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Nanomechanics of Cells and Biomaterials Studied by Atomic Force Microscopy
Authors: Jason I. Kilpatrick, Irène Revenko, Brian J. Rodriguez
Journal: Advanced Healthcare Materials (2018)

Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2015, 4, 2456–2474 In this article, there were typographical errors in equations 1, 4, 7, 13, and 14. The corrected equations are as follows: This correction does not affect the remaining content of the paper, nor its conclusions.
Important Aspects of the Evidence for TCDD Carcinogenicity in Man
Authors: Eric S. Johnson
Journal: Environmental Health Perspectives (1993)

Most of the evidence for the carcinogenicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in humans has centered on whether TCDD causes soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) and malignant lymphomas (ML). Recently, reports from two of the largest occupational cohort studies have become available. A critical reappraisal of these and other recent reports indicates that it is unlikely that TCDD causes malignant lymphomas in humans. For STS, the evidence for an etiologic role for TCDD is not convincing. However, more data and further clarification are needed before a clear and objective evaluation can be made. Factors such as level of exposure, sex, and host susceptibility may be critical determinants of whether cancer occurs; there is evidence from both humans and animals that these factors play a role, and therefore these factors should be considered in future evaluations. There is a serious need to rule out the possibility that observed effects are due to other concomitant exposures. Consideration of the carcinogenic effects of TCDD in animals reveals consistency with the human data and points to other cancers such as those of the thyroid gland and lung, for example, which are more likely candidates for investigating the role of TCDD in their occurrence, while at the same time providing a basis for a better understanding and interpretation of the human data. There are now sufficient epidemiologic studies in place that will provide a better climate for a definitive evaluation in the near future.
Die Röntgentherapie in der Dermatologie.
Journal: JAMA (1910)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Drs. Li, Smadel Win $10,000 Lasker Research Awards
Journal: JAMA (1962)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
States face rocky road to reform
Authors: R. Voelker
Journal: JAMA (1995)

WHEN NATIONAL health system reform withered and died last September, state governments took center stage. Their reputations as "laboratories" for innovation and creativity grew, as the nation soon realized that reforms would be incremental rather than comprehensive. There's no doubt that the states will proceed with reform efforts in 1995. But many of the results—or lack thereof— will carry the imprint of two main elements in the states' formula for reform: waivers from the federal Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) that allow state experimentation with Medicaid programs and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) that governs employee benefit plans. "Even though national reform didn't materialize, the important issues have not gone away. Now the states will be the pressure point, and we can be effective, particularly if we get cooperation from the federal government," says Pennsylvania State Sen Allyson Schwartz (D, Philadelphia). <h3>Medicaid Waivers</h3> One such avenue
The Young Doctor and Health Insurance
Journal: JAMA (2017)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Syllabus of Gynecology; based on the American Text-Book of Gynecology.
Journal: JAMA (1895)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Chemistry: General, Medical and Pharmaceutic, including the Chemistry of the U. S. Pharmacopeia.
Journal: JAMA (1899)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
ITALY
Journal: JAMA (1933)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Journals JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2024 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Safeguards in Chloroform Administration
Authors: W. J. J. Arnold
Journal: BMJ (1897)

<h3>ABSTRACT</h3> <h3>Introduction</h3> Australia introduced ‘lockdown’ measures to control COVID-19 on 22 March 2020. For two months, Australians were asked to remain at home and only leave for essential activities. We investigate the impact this had on sexual and reproductive health (SRH). <h3>Methods</h3> Australians aged 18+ were eligible to participate in an online survey from 23 April-11 May 2020. Questions included contraceptive use, pregnancy intentions and access to SRH services. We report on the experiences of 518 female participants aged &lt;50 years. Pregnancy intentions and contraceptive use were analysed using descriptive statistics. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to investigate difficulty accessing SRH products and services. Qualitative data were analysed using descriptive thematic analysis. <h3>Results</h3> Most participants (55.4%, 287/518) were aged 18-24 years. Most (76.1%, 379/498) indicated they were trying to avoid pregnancy. The oral contraceptive pill was the most common single method used (20.8%; 107/514). Nearly 20% (101/514) reported they were not using contraception. Older women (OR=0.4; 95%CI: 0.1, 0.9 for 25-34 vs 18-24 years) and those employed (OR=0.4; 95%CI: 0.2, 0.7) had less trouble accessing contraception during lockdown. Women aged 25-34 (OR=0.4; 95%CI: 0.3, 0.7) or 35-49 years (OR=0.3; 95%CI: 0.1, 0.6) were less likely to experience difficulty accessing feminine hygiene products. Qualitative analysis suggested that COVID-19 affected pregnancy plans, with participants delaying childbearing, or deciding to remain childfree. <h3>Conclusion</h3> COVID-19 lockdown impacted the SRH of Australian women. Findings highlight the importance of continued access to SRH services and products during global emergencies. <h3>KEY MESSAGES</h3> Nearly a third of participants reported difficulties accessing their usual feminine hygiene products during lockdown in Australia. Participants reported delaying childbearing or deciding to remain childfree due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ensuring continued access to sexual and reproductive health services and products for all who require them during global emergencies is essential.
Soins oculaires À l'usage des infirmières.
Journal: JAMA (1918)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Indoor Humidity.
Authors: Henry Mitchell Smith.
Journal: JAMA (1905)

Brooklyn, Feb. 14, 1905. <h3>To the Editor:</h3> —Since the publication of my paper on "Indoor Humidity," which you were good enough to review in the columns ofThe Journal, a firm engaged in the manufacture of a well-known and widely advertised disinfectant, namely, "Platt's Chlorides," has, without my permission, and much to my annoyance, used my name and extracts from my paper in its advertisements. The omission of quotation marks and the clever wording make me appear responsible for recommending that preparation in connection with humidification. I wish to disclaim all responsibility for the use this firm has seen fit to make of the material contained in my paper. I have requested them to discontinue all such references.
THU-331-Derivation and validation of a cardiovascular risk score for prediction of major acute cardiovascular events in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: The importance of an elevated mean platelet volume
Authors: Robin D. Abeles, Benjamin H. Mullish, Roberta Forlano, Maciej Adler, Nikos Giannakeas, Alexandros Tzallas, Michael Yee, Jamil Mayet, Robert D. Goldin, Mark Thursz, Pinelopi Manousou
Journal: Journal of Hepatology (2019)