tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Ethics
Authors: E. D. Pellegrino
Journal: JAMA (1995)

Late in 1994, two previously impassable ethical barriers were crossed in the United States: Oregon became the first jurisdiction to legalize physician-assisted suicide,<sup>1</sup>and, for the first time, a National Institutes of Health advisory panel approved funding for the production of human embryos for research purposes.<sup>2,3</sup>Both measures are temporarily in limbo, one as a result of an Executive Order (<i>Washington Post</i>. December 3,1994:A1, A8) and the other as a result of a constitutional challenge (<i>Washington Post</i>. December 28,1994:A7). Vigorous debate promises to continue for many years as these and related efforts to control the beginning and ending of human life are advanced as public policy. (In the spirit of these reviews, I will not argue my positions. Lest this be misunderstood as moral neutrality, I declare myself firmly opposed on moral grounds to both physician-assisted suicide and the production of human embryos for research purposes.) Both measures
Handbuch der Geisteskrankheiten.
Journal: JAMA (1930)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Let the Good Work go on.
Journal: JAMA (1895)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Directory of Approved Residencies
Journal: JAMA (1960)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Journals JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2024 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Letter: The psychiatrist as physician
Authors: J. F. Maddux
Journal: JAMA (1976)

<h3>In Reply.—</h3> It is gratifying to have one's observations confirmed by the observations of colleagues. In my article I referred to the literature concerning awareness during surgery, and I attempted to demonstrate that in some instances this experience can have a profound and even lasting effect. Drs Silbergleit, Messer, and Archer, as well as Ms Michael, support this with clinical data. Dr Archer answers some of Dr Larson's objections quite well. I would add that I do not suggest that the dose of anesthesia was inadequate nor that the anesthesiologists were negligent. It goes without saying that the first consideration must be the preservation of the patient's life, and for this reason, as Dr Jobes points out, light levels are often necessary. Psychic distress is clearly a better choice than death, and I would prefer to try to patch up the psyche of a living patient than have him die
Research Snippets
Journal: British Journal of Dermatology (2008)

British Journal of DermatologyVolume 160, Issue 1 p. i-i Research Snippets First published: 15 December 2008 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.09009.xRead the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume160, Issue1January 2009Pages i-i RelatedInformation
Neurosurgery
Authors: Horace A. Norrell
Journal: JAMA (1970)

Producing a multiauthored short review of the entire field of neurosurgery might seem an insurmountable task. John Gillingham, however, edited such a volume by thoughtfully selecting 14 British authorities on diseases of the nervous system. Eleven of the authors are neurosurgeons. In a review of less than 400 pages, the space has been used economically by emphasizing the more common problems that the neurosurgeon encounters. Eighty percent of the book is devoted to chapters discussing neuroradiological diagnosis, head injuries, cerebral vascular disease, neoplasms, pediatric neurosurgery, and spine problems. This has been well balanced by excellent up-to-date reviews of neuroanesthesia and the neurosurgical management of intractable pain, extrapyramidal disorders, psychiatric disease, and intracranial infections. For the most part the chapters are concisely written and contain essential information. As an exception the section on neuroradiology, unfortunately the first chapter, is filled with intricate technical details of neuroradiological procedures, filling space which could
Patient-reported care satisfaction and symptom burden in hospitalized patients with cancer.
Authors: Carolyn L. Qian, Charu Vyas, Eva Gaufberg, Emilia Kaslow-Zieve, Chinenye C. Azoba, Irene Wang, Emily E. Van Seventer, Richard Newcomb, Vicki A. Jackson, David P. Ryan, Joseph A. Greer, Areej El-Jawahri, Jennifer S. Temel, Ryan David Nipp
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2021)

180 Background: Hospitalized patients with cancer often experience a high symptom burden, which may impact care satisfaction and healthcare utilization. However, research describing these patients’ care satisfaction, symptom burden, and health care use is lacking. We sought to investigate relationships among care satisfaction, physical and psychological symptom burden, and hospital length of stay (LOS) in hospitalized patients with cancer. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with cancer and unplanned hospitalizations from 9/2014 to 4/2017. Upon admission, we assessed patients’ care satisfaction (FAMCARE items: satisfaction with care coordination and the speed with which symptoms are treated) as well as their physical (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]) and psychological (Patient Health Questionnaire-4 [PHQ-4]) symptoms. We used regression models to identify factors associated with care satisfaction, and we also examined associations of care satisfaction with patients’ symptom burden and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results: Among 1,576 participants (median age = 65.0 years [range:19-96], 46.3% female, 70.9% with incurable cancer, 58.4% admitted to a dedicated oncology service), most reported being “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with care coordination (90.1%) and the speed with which symptoms are treated (89.0%). Older age (care coordination: B &lt; 0.01, P = 0.022, speed with which symptoms are treated: B = 0.01, P = 0.001) and admission to a dedicated oncology service (B = 0.20, P &lt; 0.001 for each) were associated with higher care satisfaction. Higher satisfaction with care coordination was associated with lower ESAS-physical (B = -1.28, P = 0.007), ESAS-total (B = -2.73, P &lt; 0.001), PHQ4-depression (B = -0.14, P = 0.022), and PHQ4-anxiety (B = -0.16, P = 0.008) symptoms. Higher satisfaction with the speed with which symptoms are treated was associated with lower ESAS-physical (B = -1.32, P = 0.003), ESAS-total (B = -2.46, P &lt; 0.001), PHQ4-depression (B = -0.14, P = 0.014), and PHQ4-anxiety (B = -0.17, P = 0.004) symptoms. Greater satisfaction with care coordination (B = -0.48, P = 0.040) and the speed with which symptoms are treated (B = -0.44, P = 0.041) were both associated with shorter LOS. Conclusions: Hospitalized patients with cancer report high care satisfaction, which correlates with older age and admission to a dedicated oncology service. Significant associations among higher care satisfaction, lower symptom burden, and shorter hospital LOS highlight the importance of improving symptom management and care coordination in this population.
Gallbladder disease and the cardiac status
Authors: E. D. Palmer
Journal: JAMA (1975)

FOR YEARS clinicians have suspected some connection between gallbladder disease and certain cardiac disorders. Varied experiences have suggested an association significant enough to justify cholecystectomy as hopeful therapy for angina pectoris and paroxysmal atrial tachycardia. For others, the only important interrelationship concerns problems of bedside differential diagnosis. The whole matter is in need of clarification. These things are known with reasonable confidence (Friedman's<sup>1</sup>review is recommended): In some patients, removal of a diseased gallbladder is followed by disappearance of long-standing, periodic premature ventricular contractions. In some patients, removal of a diseased gallbladder is followed by disappearance of anginal attacks. It has been reported on several occasions that removal of a diseased gallbladder has been followed by disappearance of Adams-Stokes attacks. No statistical relationship can be found between cholesterosis of the gallbladder and coronary artery disease. During gallbladder surgery, when the gallbladder or cystic duct is already distended, the manipulations
PUNCTURE WOUND OF THE LEFT VENTRICLE OF THE HEART
Journal: JAMA (1921)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Fourteenth Annual Report of State Board of Health of New York.
Journal: JAMA (1895)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Patients' acceptance of physician's assistants
Authors: E. C. Nelson
Journal: JAMA (1974)

Patients of physicians using physician's assistants in their practices were surveyed to determine attitudes toward these assistants. Fifty-four percent of the patients responded and 12% of the nonrespondents were interviewed to insure that respondents were representative of the sample. Patients rate the physician's assistants highly in terms of technical competence (89%), professional manner (86%), and report improvements in the quality of care (71%) and access to services (79%), since the physician's assistants began working. Eighty-seven percent of the patients who received physical examinations from physician's assistants were very satisfied. Patient's age, social class, and access to medical services are significantly related to certain attitudes toward physician's assistants. (<i>JAMA</i>228:63-67, 1974)
The health care resource allocation debate. Defining our terms
Authors: D C Hadorn, R H Brook
Journal: JAMA (1991)

The problem of health care distribution in the United States demands immediate action. Many different solutions have been proposed to slow rising health care costs and to improve access to care for the poor and uninsured. Debate among proponents of these various proposals might be advanced if a common language were adopted with regard to certain key terms instead of the various meanings currently assigned to these terms. For this reason, we propose and defend the following three definitions: (1)<i>rationing</i>is the societal toleration of inequitable access to health services acknowledged to be necessary by reference to necessary-care guidelines; (2)<i>health care needs</i>are desires for services that have been reasonably well demonstrated to provide significant net benefit for patients with specified clinical conditions; and (3)<i>basic benefit plans</i>are insurance packages that provide for all and only acknowledged health care needs, again by reference to appropriate clinical guidelines. (<i>JAMA</i>. 1991;266:3328-3331)
Correction
Journal: JAMA (1982)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
THE CLINIC.
Journal: JAMA (1891)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Book Review
Authors: Stuart Shipko, I. Modai, A. Bleich, Galia Cygielman, Ranjan Roy, Maurizio Fava, Giovanni A. Fava, Robert Kellner, Emanuela Serafini, Ismaele Mastrogiacomo, Rolf Eide, Reidar Thyholdt, Espen Hamre
Journal: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (1982)
Isolation of lymphadenopathy-associated virus (LAV) and detection of LAV antibodies from US patients with AIDS
Authors: F. Barre-Sinoussi
Journal: JAMA (1985)

A human retrovirus was isolated from the peripheral blood of three American patients newly diagnosed with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). In each case the major core viral protein (p25) was shown to be antigenically identical to that of the prototype lymphadenopathyassociated virus (LAV). Two of the viral isolates were derived from intravenous narcotics abusers, the first demonstration of LAV isolation from this risk group. Antibody to LAV was detected by an IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the serum samples of these and 14 additional American patients with AIDS and in none of 12 hospital worker controls. These findings provide support for the etiologic association of LAV and AIDS. (<i>JAMA</i>1985;253:1737-1739)
Queries and Minor Notes
Journal: JAMA (1926)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Infographic. Can even experienced orthopaedic surgeons predict who will benefit from surgery when patients present with degenerative meniscal tears? A survey of 194 orthopaedic surgeons who made 3880 predictions
Authors: Coen H Bloembergen, Victor A van de Graaf, Adam Virgile, Nienke W Willigenburg, Julia C A Noorduyn, Daniel BF Saris, Ian Harris, Rudolf W Poolman
Journal: British Journal of Sports Medicine (2019)
Benzodiazepines of long and short elimination half-life and the risk of hip fracture
Authors: W. A. Ray
Journal: JAMA (1989)

To determine if the risk of hip fracture differed between persons receiving benzodiazepines with long (≥24 hours) or short (&lt;24 hours) elimination half-lives, we conducted a nested case-control study among residents of the Canadian province of Saskatchewan who were 65 years of age and older. We identified 4501 cases occurring between 1977 and 1985 from computerized hospital records and 24 041 population controls. Current benzodiazepine use, defined as having filled a prescription in the past 30 days, was ascertained from computerized pharmacy records. The relative risk of hip fracture was 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 2.0) for current users of long half-life benzodiazepines, in contrast to that of 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.9 to 1.3) for current users of short half-life drugs. This finding was not altered by sex, age, calendar year, nursing home residence, or history of hospitalization. Medical record review for a sample of 189 cases suggested that this finding was not due to confounding by dementia, ambulatory status, functional status, or body mass. (<i>JAMA</i>. 1989;262:3303-3307)
Corrigenda
Authors: R S I N H A, K Lecamwasam, M Middleton, L F E A R F I E
Journal: British Journal of Dermatology (2014)

effects associated with vemurafenib treatment are manageable, and dose reduction and/or interruption can be useful in reducing these toxicities. 2 This is the first case report associating vemurafenib with TEN.
Structured Personal Diabetes Care in Primary Health Care Affects Only Women's HbA1c
Authors: A. B.S. Nielsen
Journal: Diabetes Care (2006)

OBJECTIVE—Diabetic men and women differ in lifestyle and attitudes toward diabetes and may benefit differently from interventions to improve glycemic control. We explored the relation between HbA1c (A1C), sex, treatment allocation, and their interactions with behavioral and attitudinal characteristics in patients with type 2 diabetes.