tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
CURRENT NEEDS FOR MEDICAL AND HEALTH PERSONNEL
Journal: JAMA (1942)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
BLOOD CRYSTALS.
Journal: JAMA (1898)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
BI24: Reimbursement systems as a barrier to sunscreen use for organ transplant recipients in Ireland: a community pharmacist survey
Journal: British Journal of Dermatology (2021)

for diabetes and renal impairment were unremarkable.Further biopsies revealed shallow, cup-shaped disruptions of acanthotic epidermis with thick plugs of basophilic debris and collagen elimination to the surface, consistent with an acquired perforating dermatosis (APD).Prominent elimination of elastic fibres was also observed.Natalizumab was considered the most likely culprit, prompting a switch to ocrelizumab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody).Narrowband ultraviolet B therapy was started.Within 2 months, his skin demonstrated significant improvement.APD is typically associated with conditions such as diabetes, renal impairment, malignancies and, more rarely, drugs.We herein present a case of natalizumab-induced APD, which adds to the list of recognized skin complications from natalizumab, including alopecia, urticaria and flushing.To date, there has been one other case report of natalizumab-induced APD (Piqu e-Duran E, Egu ıa P, Garc ıa-V azquez O. Acquired perforating dermatosis associated with natalizumab.J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 68: e185-7).APD has been reported to relate to other biologics, which have a variety of therapeutic targets.The mechanism by which these monoclonal antibodies contribute to a perforating dermatosis is unknown.Medication-associated APD is most commonly found in men over 50 years of age, with the development of this skin condition typically within months of treatment onset.Our patient uniquely extends this time window to 5 years.Histologically, biological therapy-induced APD features perforation of collagen alone, compared with our case, which showed perforation of both collagen and elastic fibres.Natalizumab-induced APD should be considered in people with RRMS who present with pruritic eczematous eruptions, irrespective of the duration of therapy.
Erratum
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019)

The authors made an error in Figure 6, where the same micrograph was inadvertently inserted twice to represent IL-8 and MMP2 in the MeWo-D column.With more than 16 years elapsing from the conduct of these experiments, the authors have informed JCO that the original micrographs are no longer available, but they confirm that the staining pattern for both IL-8 and MMP2 exhibited increased protein expression as compared to MeWo.
Error in Reporting of Exclusions
Journal: JAMA (2016)

Daryl J. Kor, MD, MSc; Rickey E. Carter, PhD; Pauline K. Park, MD; Emir Festic, MD, MSc; Valerie M. Banner-Goodspeed, ALB, MPH; Richard Hinds, MS, RRT; Daniel Talmor, MD, MPH; Ognjen Gajic, MD, MSc; Lorraine B. Ware, MD; Michelle Ng Gong, MD, MS; for the US Critical Illness and Injury Trials Group: Lung Injury Prevention with Aspirin Study Group (USCIITG: LIPS-A)
Massive Cerebral Hemorrhage
Journal: JAMA (1963)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Response to Letters Regarding Article, “Rheumatic Heart Disease Screening by Echocardiography: The Inadequacy of World Health Organization Criteria for Optimizing the Diagnosis of Subclinical Disease”
Authors: Eloi Marijon, Xavier Jouven, David S. Celermajer, Muriel Tafflet, Saïd El-Haou, Dinesh Jani, Beatriz Ferreira, Ana Olga Mocumbi, Daniel Sidi, Christophe Paquet
Journal: Circulation (2010)
ANTIRACHITIC SUBSTANCES
Journal: JAMA (1923)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Know Thy Microwave Wattage
Journal: JAMA (2014)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant androgen deprivation with radiation therapy for prostate cancer: Does sequencing matter?
Authors: Michael A. Weller, Rahul D. Tendulkar, Chandana A. Reddy, Kevin L. Stephans, Patrick Kupelian
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2013)

37 Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is typically given neoadjuvantly and concurrently with radiation therapy (RT) rather than adjuvantly in the management of intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. Our objective is to compare outcomes between patients who receive adjuvant ADT (ADJ), i.e. immediately after the completion of RT, with those who receive a neoadjuvant and concurrent regimen (NEO). Methods: From 1995-2002, 515 patients with CaP were definitively treated with RT and ADT. ADT was given for a duration of 6 months in all cases. NEO was given 2-3 months prior to the start of RT. ADJ was initiated immediately following the completion of RT. ADT sequencing was NEO in 311 (60%) and ADJ in 204 (40%). The distribution by NCCN risk classification for NEO was high in 67%, intermediate in 26%, and low in 7%. The risk group distribution for ADJ was high in 69%, and intermediate in 31%. RT dose was either 78 Gy at 2 Gy/fx (n=168) or 70 Gy at 2.5 Gy/fx (n=347). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate biochemical relapse free survival (bRFS, Phoenix definition), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the impact of ADT timing on outcomes. Results: The median follow up for all patients was 8 years. For the entire cohort, the 10-yr bRFS, DMFS and OS rates were 61%, 80% and 66%, respectively. The 10-yr bRFS rates for ADJ vs. NEO were 63% vs. 60% (p=0.98). The 10-yr DMFS rates for ADJ vs. NEO were both 80% (p=0.60). The 10-yr OS rates for ADJ vs. NEO were 65% vs. 67% (p=0.98). There were no statistically significant differences in bRFS, DMFS or OS between the two groups after accounting for patient, tumor and treatment characteristics on both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: There is no difference between neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant ADT in the setting of dose-escalated RT for localized prostate cancer. This suggests that the synergy between radiation therapy and androgen deprivation is independent of the sequencing of both modalities and that the initiation of RT does not need to be delayed for a course of neoadjuvant ADT.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Chicago
Journal: JAMA (1965)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Notter &amp;amp; Firth's Hygiene
Journal: JAMA (1941)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Professional boundaries in the physician-patient relationship
Authors: G. O. Gabbard
Journal: JAMA (1995)

THE SUBJECT of professional boundaries (and boundary violations) has received a great deal of recent attention in the psychiatric literature.<sup>1-5</sup>The emphasis on defining guidelines for professional conduct has expanded beyond the confines of ethics committees and has worked its way into licensing boards charged with disciplining physicians whose behavior jeopardizes the well-being of patients. The Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine,<sup>6</sup>for example, has recently issued detailed guidelines on such matters as self-disclosure, dual relationships, sexual relationships with patients, and other professional boundaries to help define for the public and for the profession the parameters of professional conduct in the practice of psychotherapy by physicians. While specialists in psychiatry have been debating the pros and cons of issuing such guidelines, nonpsychiatric physicians have yet to involve themselves so extensively in similar discussions. In this article, we will provide a conceptual framework for discussion of professional boundaries in
BUBONIC PLAGUE.
Journal: JAMA (1900)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Brain Dopamine D&lt;char aid="99736249" id="sub"&gt;1&lt;/char&gt; Receptors in Twins Discordant for Schizophrenia
Authors: Jussi Hirvonen
Journal: American Journal of Psychiatry (2006)

Objective: It has been suggested that deficits in higher-order cognitive functions serve as intermediate phenotypic indicators of genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia. The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia postulates that insufficiency of dopamine transmission in the prefrontal cortex contributes to the cognitive deficits observed in patients with the disease, and there is robust empirical evidence for a central role of prefrontal cortex dopamine D 1 receptors in working memory functions. Method: The authors examined the genetic and nongenetic effects on D 1 receptor binding in schizophrenia by studying monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs discordant for schizophrenia as well as healthy comparison twins using positron emission tomography (PET) and the D 1 receptor antagonist ligand [ 11 C]SCH 23390. Performance on neuropsychological tests sensitive to frontal lobe functioning was evaluated. Results: High D 1 receptor density in the medial prefrontal cortex, superior temporal gyrus, and heteromodal association cortex (angular gyrus) was associated with increasing genetic risk for schizophrenia (comparison twins < unaffected dizygotic co-twins < unaffected monozygotic co-twins). Medicated schizophrenia patients demonstrated a widespread reduction in D 1 receptor binding when compared with the unaffected co-twin, and higher doses of antipsychotics were associated with lower D 1 receptor binding in the frontotemporal regions. Conclusions: This study demonstrated an association between genetic risk for schizophrenia and alterations in cortical D 1 receptor binding, an observation that has implications for future studies of the molecular genetics of schizophrenia. In addition, the data indicate a widespread reduction of D 1 receptor binding in medicated schizophrenia patients, supporting a link between antipsychotic drug action and dopamine D 1 receptor down-regulation.
MINERS' CRAMP
Authors: E. M. Brockbank
Journal: BMJ (1929)

MINERS" CRAMP.a= 66 or diathermy, is used in addition to massage for pain over the wrist; when this is associated with stiffness, faradism to the forearm muscles is .sometimestried, also siniusoidal current ar-nm baths.Wheni stiffness of the joinlts persists after eiglht weeks without pain, the masseuse gives mo-emiient of the stiff joints with a steady pull on the resisting muscles.The patient also performs activ-e nolbilitv exer- cises-pronatioIn and supination with a weighted stick, and wrist flexion and extensioi bly lmeanis of a pulley, the patient assisting movement by pulling on the rope with the sound hand.To lengthen the lever arm, the hand is fixed in a clamp and the rope attached to a bar projecting from the distal end].The remaining 12 cases (3.7 per cent. of the total) may be regarded as bad results.This group is at once the most initerestinig and instructive, as it gives some indication of loopholes in the treatmen-t.The cases are given in detail.eof.Sex.! Age.
Correction: Postcards or outpatients: an alternative method of follow-up
Authors: Peter Benny, John Macvicar, P Farrow, R Wilkinson
Journal: BMJ (1979)

changes of pregnancy produced a reversible increase in the fat content of the cells of pre-existing tumours, and (b) that increased peripheral blood flow in pregnancy caused an alteration in the water content of already existent though impalpable tumours.
A Summary of Correlated Facts Concerning Undulant Fever in Humans and Contagious Abortion in Animals and the Relationship of One to the Other from the Standpoint of Transmission Through Meat and Milk Products.
Journal: JAMA (1930)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Validation of a model to identify young patients for lymph node biopsy
Authors: G. B. Slap
Journal: JAMA (1986)

A model to identify 9- to 25-year-old patients with malignant or granulomatous lymphadenopathy demonstrated a sensitivity/specificity of 0.95/0.96 in the original sample. This study tests the performance of the model in three new samples (n=34, 87, 46) of young patients with peripheral lymphadenopathy. Patient charts were reviewed for the biopsy diagnosis and for the three variables in the model (lymph node size, recent ear-nose-throat symptoms, and chest roentgenogram). Prevalence rates of malignancy or granuloma in the three samples were 0.71, 0.37, and 0.37. The model's sensitivity/specificity in the three samples were 0.96/1.00, 0.88/0.80, and 0.82/0.83. Receiver operating characteristic curve areas for the model ranged from 0.87 to 0.98, indicating excellent discrimination. Likelihood ratios were calculated for all scores to allow adjustment of the model's predictions for population differences in the prevalence of malignancy or granuloma. We conclude that the model performs well and can help physicians to select those young patients with peripheral lymphadenopathy who should undergo biopsy. (<i>JAMA</i>1986;255:2768-2773)
Errors in Analysis of New Persistent Opioid Use After Surgery
Journal: JAMA Surgery (2019)

Chad M. Brummett, MD; Jennifer F. Waljee, MD, MPH, MS; Jenna Goesling, PhD; Stephanie Moser, PhD; Paul Lin, MS; Michael J. Englesbe, MD; Amy S. B. Bohnert, PhD, MHS; Sachin Kheterpal, MD, MBA; Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, MD, MPH