Checklist of Information for Inclusion in Reports of Clinical Trials
Authors: The Asilomar Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature*
Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine (1996)

Academia and Clinic15 April 1996Checklist of Information for Inclusion in Reports of Clinical TrialsThe Asilomar Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature*The Asilomar Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature*Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-124-8-199604150-00007 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail In December 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine published a paper titled "Call for Comments on a Proposal to Improve Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature" [1]. The proposal was the undertaking of the Asilomar Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature, which includes the principal editors of four medical journals, four biostatisticians, two biomedical investigators, three academic biomedical editors, and an information scientist, all of whom participate professionally in the planning, performance, reporting, or publishing of clinical trials. This call for comments also appeared in the journals of several professional societies for ...References1. Call for comments on a proposal to improve reporting of clinical trials in the biomedical literature. Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121:894-5. Google Scholar2. A proposal for structured reporting of randomized, controlled trials. The Standards of Reporting Trials Group. JAMA. 1994; 272:1926-31. Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: *For members of the Working Group, see the Appendix. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited byWhat are the real risks for breast cancer?An evaluation of the completeness of safety reporting in reports of complementary and alternative medicine trialsDescribing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic reviewInstructional Scaffolding to Improve Students' Skills in Evaluating Clinical LiteratureDevelopment and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural productsHormone Replacement Therapy: Real Concerns and False AlarmsRuptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Endovascular Repair versus Open Surgery—Systematic ReviewCollaborative information synthesis I: A model of information behaviors of scientists in medicine and public healthO atendimento à parada cardiorrespiratória em unidade coronariana segundo o Protocolo UtsteinElaboración de directrices para la publicación de investigación biomédica: proceso y fundamento científicoEvolution of methodological standards in surgical trialsOrthodontic Clinical Trials III: Reporting of ethical issues associated with clinical trials published in three orthodontic journals between 1989 and 1998From evidence-based medicine to clinical practice: not always straightforwardIncomplete Data Reporting in Studies of Emergency Department Patients with Potential Acute Coronary Syndromes Using TroponinsImproving Reports of Studies of Diagnostic TestsLista de comprobación (checklist) abreviada para la evaluación de artículos de investigación biomédica básicaImproving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statementCollaborative information synthesisRandomization in surgical trialsBaseline comparisons in surgical trialsAnnals of Internal Medicine at Age 75: Reflections on the Past 25 YearsEdward J. Huth, MD and Kathleen Case, MSThe Structure of a Neurosurgical ManuscriptPortal Hypertension and Portacaval Shunt**Supported by NIH Grants A3048, A5919, AM07315, AM07511, AM1228, AM19875, AM12280, AM17103, and DK41920.Better Access to Information about Clinical TrialsAlexa T. McCray, PhDBiomedical Publication for Neurosurgery Residents: A Program and GuideMulticenter randomized controlled trials in transfusion medicineReporting and concordance of methodologic criteria between abstracts and articles in diagnostic test studiesEvaluation of clinical studies of the efficacy of therapeutic apheresisImproving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statementWhat is the Quality of the Reporting of Research Ethics in Publications of Nursing Home Research?Portal hypertension and variceal bleeding: An AASLD single topic symposiumDoes quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Surgery on trial: An account of clinical trials evaluating operationsQuality and diagnostics in meta-analysisFundamentals of Controlled Clinical Trials and Basic Evaluation TechniquesRandomized controlled trials in cancer: Improving the quality of their reports will also facilitate better conductSociodemographic representation in published studies of cocaine abuse pharmacotherapyRecommended Guidelines for Reviewing, Reporting, and Conducting Research on In-hospital Resuscitation: The In-hospital "Utstein Style"*Recommended Guidelines for Reviewing, Reporting, and Conducting Research on In-Hospital Resuscitation: The In-Hospital "Utstein Style"Recommended Guidelines for Reviewing, Reporting, and Conducting Research on In-Hospital Resuscitation: The In-Hospital 'Utstein Style'Recommended guidelines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research on in-hospital resuscitation: the in-hospital 'Utstein style'Guidelines for reporting results of quality of life assessments in clinical trialsThe good, the bad, and the ugly — Qualitätsmerkmale publizierter StudienThe good, the bad, and the ugly — Qualitätsmerkmale publizierter Studien 15 April 1996Volume 124, Issue 8Page: 741-743KeywordsBiostatisticsBrainCancer preventionClinical trial reportingObstetrics and gynecologyResearch designResearch quality assessmentScientistsSurvival analysis ePublished: 15 August 2000 Issue Published: 15 April 1996 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1996 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...