tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Corrigenda
Journal: BMJ (1944)

MEDICAL JOURNALjustifiable to withhold thyroid treatment, as beneficial results are not impossible.Should the outcome be unsatisfactory it is always possible to cease thyroid therapy, and after some weeks the condi- tion will probably return to the same state as before.Incidentally, even cretins who have received continuous and adequate therapy from birth or infancy may, after many years, show mental deterioration which is not amenable to hormone therapy.As regards the dosage of thyroid, in this and other cases it is determined by the general response and the pulse rate, but more accurately by the estimation of the basal metabolic rate.Epididymitis Q.-A mnale patienit aged 73, active and workinig, conisulted me five years ago for an acute cystilis and has been under treatment ever sitnce.Bacteriological examination revealed a " free growth of B. coli," and x rays showed the presenice of two calculi in his prostate.No pyelitis.He passes urine freely, which contains threads.He was treated with mandelic acid and sulphonainides, with slight amelioration only, until he was put on hexamine, small doses of which make him fairly comfortable.He has now developed ani acuite epididymitis (second attack).He has arteriosclerosis, feels the cold very much, has persistent backache (relieved by massage), polyuria, and a painful tingling of the soles of his feet-no chilblains.Urine has always been alkaline; prostate not unduly enlarged.A recent report says urine is alkaline, specific gravity 1010, faint cloud of albumin, no sugar, small amount of pus, a small number of red blood cells, moderate deposit of amorphous phosphates, moderate numbers of triple phosphate crystals, a few squamous epithelial cells, large numbers of bacteria, and free growth of B. coli.A.-The most urgent trouble at the present moment would appear to be the epididymitis, and even though sulphonamides did not appear of benefit previously, it would be worth while putting him on sulphathiazole now.Recurrent attacks of epididymitis are fre- quently associated with a fibrous pros.atecontaining calculi, and in one or two cases I have known they were so frequent that I divided the vas in order to cut the path along which the infection travelled.
Second renal transplants in cvhildren.
Journal: BMJ (1973)

3 interposed at the fracture, an aspect that might be expected to lead to problems if the patient survived long.Though nine of their patients lived for more than a year, in only one was non-union associated with recurrence of pain.J. R. Hoare7 has reported the recovery of tumour cells from the inferior vena cava after operation on some patho- logical fractures, confirming the possibility of dissemination of the growth.It is dcifficult to assess the importance of this observation, 'but it seems wise to avoid needless disturbance of tumour tissue.Use of the reamer may often be avoided, and if possible nailing should be by a closed technique with- out exposure of the fracture.Routine curettage of the tum- our mass is probably not desirable, but the selective use of acrylic cement will allow fixation of fractures that would otherwise be unmanageable.The advantages of the method will then outweigh any theoretical dangers.
Together
Authors: Myra Sklarew
Journal: JAMA (1993)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Progressive systemic sclerosis resulting in megacolon. A case report
Authors: R. C. Shamberger
Journal: JAMA (1983)

THE TERM "scleroderma" retains general usage despite the well-known involvement by this disease of organs other than the skin. Goetz,<sup>1</sup>in 1945, first proposed its replacement by "progressive systemic sclerosis." The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is not spared, and esophageal disease initially seen as dysphagia or reflux is one of its most typical features. Small-intestinal involvement has also received its share of attention of late, with recognition of pseudo-obstruction, malabsorption, and diarrhea as possible manifestations. Characteristic radiological features have been described in the colon, and constipation may be a troublesome complaint in some patients. Rarely, however, does colonic involvement require more than symptomatic treatment. We report a case of progressive systemic sclerosis in which the GI tract was the major site of involvement and in which progressive colonic disease produced megacolon requiring resection, a previously unreported complication, to our knowledge. <h3>Report of a Case</h3> A 58-year-old man was admitted to
The Bell
Authors: Susan A. Glod
Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine (2018)

Ad Libitum2 October 2018The BellSusan A. Glod, MDSusan A. Glod, MDPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (S.A.G.)Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/M17-2486 Audio Reading - “The Bell” Audio. Virginia L. Hood, MD, a physician from the University of Vermont, reads "The Bell," by S.A. Glod. Your browser does not support the audio element. Audio player progress bar Step backward in current audio track Play current audio trackPause current audio track Step forward in current audio track Mute current audio trackUnmute current audio track 00:00/ SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail I had just given you the test resultsWhen the airless quiet of your hospital roomWas broken by a raucous clangAnd a cheer.Someone had rung the bell.“Isn't that nice to hear,” you mused.“Somebody else's cancer is cured.”And closed your eyes. Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (S.A.G.)Current Author Address: Susan A. Glod, MD, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mail Code H106, 500 University Drive, PO Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033-0520; e-mail, [email protected]psu.edu. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement Audio Reading - “The Bell” Audio. Virginia L. Hood, MD, a physician from the University of Vermont, reads "The Bell," by S.A. Glod. Your browser does not support the audio element. Audio player progress bar Step backward in current audio track Play current audio trackPause current audio track Step forward in current audio track Mute current audio trackUnmute current audio track 00:00/ FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited byThe Cancer Bell: Too Much of a Good Thing? 2 October 2018Volume 169, Issue 7Page: 506 ePublished: 2 October 2018 Issue Published: 2 October 2018 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2018 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
Incorrect Data or Information
Authors: Anthony Gallagher, Tapan Mehta, David Allison
Journal: JAMA (2018)

Eliano P. Navarese, MD, PhD; Jennifer G. Robinson, MD, MPH; Mariusz Kowalewski, MD; Michalina Kołodziejczak, MD; Felicita Andreotti, MD; Kevin Bliden, MD; Udaya Tantry, PhD; Jacek Kubica, MD, PhD; Paolo Raggi, MD; Paul A. Gurbel, MD
Ixekizumab treatment for psoriasis: integrated efficacy analysis of three double-blinded, controlled studies (UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, UNCOVER-3)
Authors: K.A. Papp, C.L. Leonardi, A. Blauvelt, K. Reich, N.J. Korman, M. Ohtsuki, C. Paul, S. Ball, G.S. Cameron, J. Erickson, L. Zhang, L. Mallbris, C.E.M. Griffiths
Journal: British Journal of Dermatology (2018)

Psoriasis is a disease that causes the skin to form thick scales that get red, itchy, and dry. About 2–4% of the Western population has psoriasis. We tested if ixekizumab, an approved psoriasis treatment, was better at improving psoriasis symptoms than placebo (a nonactive drug) or etanercept (another approved psoriasis treatment). Patients from 21 countries were included. We combined data from 3 different studies where patients were given 80 mg of ixkeizumab every 2 weeks, 80 mg of ixekizumab every 4 weeks, 50 mg of etanercept twice weekly (only in 2 studies), or placebo. Patients who were given ixekizumab started with a 160‐mg initial dose. We measured psoriasis improvement by the percentage of patients who were rated by their physician as having little or no psoriasis after 12 weeks of treatment [sPGA (0, 1)]. Patients who improved by 75% from their initial (baseline) psoriasis assessment [PASI 75] were also considered to have benefited from treatment. We found that ixekizumab treatment was better than placebo and etanercept when measured by the percentage of patients who had these results [sPGA 0, 1 and PASI 75]. Patients treated with ixekizumab started to do better than those treated with placebo or etanercept as early as Week 1. Patients had some side effects when taking etanercept or ixekizumab, but about 95% stayed in the study. Ixekizumab given every 2 weeks was better than ixekizumab given every 4 weeks during the first 12 weeks. Patients who take ixekizumab for their psoriasis are likely to have a good response.
HIV Transmission Among Male Inmates in a State Prison System—Georgia, 1992-2005
Journal: JAMA (2006)

The estimated prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is nearly five times higher for incarcerated populations (2.0%) than for the general U.S. population (0.43%). In 1988, the Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC) initiated mandatory HIV testing of inmates upon entry into prison and voluntary HIV testing of inmates on request or if clinically indicated. GDC offered voluntary HIV testing to inmates annually during July 2003-June 2005 and currently offers testing to inmates on request. During July 1988-February 2005, a total of 88 male inmates were known to have had both a negative HIV test result upon entry into prison and a subsequent confirmed positive HIV test result (i.e., seroconversion) during incarceration. Of these 88 inmates, 37 (42%) had had more than one negative HIV test result before their HIV diagnosis. In October 2004, GDC and the Georgia Division of Public Health invited CDC to assist with an epidemiologic investigation of HIV risk behaviors and transmission patterns among male inmates within GDC facilities and to make HIV prevention recommendations for the prison population. This report describes the results of that investigation, which identified the following characteristics as associated with HIV seroconversion in prison: male-male sex in prison, tattooing in prison, older age (i.e., age of >26 years at date of interview), having served > or =5 years of the current sentence, black race, and having a body mass index (BMI) of < or =25.4 kg/m2 on entry into prison. Findings from the investigation demonstrated that risk behaviors such as male-male sex and tattooing were associated with HIV transmission among inmates, highlighting the need for HIV prevention programs for this population.
Shiga bacillus infection. Experience in Los Angeles County, 1966 to 1971
Authors: C. T. Friedman
Journal: JAMA (1973)

In August 1970, an 18-month-old girl, who had never been outside of Los Angeles County, was found to have shiga bacillus dysentery. Consequently, we established a surveillance of all cases of this disease in the county. Twenty cases occurred between 1966 and 1971; 19 of them in the last three years. Two patients died. Three had never traveled out of the county. Of 47 family contacts, 5 had evidence of asymptomatic infection. The sudden rise in incidence of this disease and the documented spread within the county are a warning for the future.
Diagnostik und Therapie der Kinderkrankheiten mit speziellen Arzneiverordnungen für das Kindesalter. Ein Taschenbuch für den praktischen Arzt.
Journal: JAMA (1923)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Surgery, St. Louis
Journal: JAMA (1967)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
Urinary tract infections. Flow charts (algorithms) for detection and treatment
Authors: C. M. Kunin
Journal: JAMA (1975)

THE DIAGNOSIS and management of urinary tract infection rests on two major concepts. The first,<i>significant bacteriuria</i>, provides the basis for definitive diagnosis, efficacy of therapy, and follow-up. Until recently, it was relatively expensive to test for significant bacteriuria. Also, results were often available only after the physician had had to make a therapeutic commitment. Significant bacteriuria can now be detected by excellent, inexpensive office methods, including microscopic examination of the urine and quantitative culture. In addition, there now are commercially available chemical tests, which when properly used should be helpful for both screening and follow-up. The second major concept is a<i>therapeutic concept</i>that divides urinary tract infection into the so-called<i>complicated</i>(or surgical) and<i>uncomplicated</i>(or medical) categories of infection. It is relatively easy to treat infection uncomplicated by structural or neurologic lesions. Numerous effective antimicrobial agents are useful both for treatment and prophylaxis. Furthermore, antimicrobial sensitivity tests
Warning Issued About Street Drugs Containing Botanical Sources of Ephedrine
Journal: JAMA (1996)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
HOLLAND
Journal: JAMA (1924)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
The Jamaica Hospital: A History of the Institution 1892-1942
Journal: JAMA (1942)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
OF REFERENCES
Journal: JAMA (1966)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal