Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer
Authors: Victoria L. Seewaldt
Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine (2010)

Letters20 April 2010Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast CancerFREEVictoria L. Seewaldt, MDVictoria L. Seewaldt, MDFrom Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00205 SectionsAboutVisual AbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail TO THE EDITOR:The USPSTF (1) recently recommended against routine mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 years. The recommendation was based on the relative probability of unscreened women dying of breast cancer and the reduction in mortality provided by mammographic screening. On the basis of these studies, the USPSTF issued a blanket recommendation against routine screening mammography in all women aged 40 to 49 years.The USPSTF study lacks evidence to support a reduction in mammography screening in African-American and Latino women who are younger than 50 years (1). The USPSTF study analyzed the risk–benefit ratio of mammography as a function of a woman's age but did not consider the potential contributions of race and ethnicity (1). Investigators did not state the racial and ethnic composition of study participants and did not analyze the risk–benefit ratio of mammography in African-American and Latino women (1). It is concerning that the USPSTF issued a one-size-fits-all recommendation on breast cancer screening without considering whether the recommendation is appropriate for all women.Our current recommendations for mammography screening are based on studies in European, European-Canadian, and European-American women. Eight randomized trials (2) studied the effectiveness of mammography in the United States, Sweden, Canada, and the United Kingdom. These studies balance the relative contributions of mammographic density (sensitivity and specificity of mammography) and the mortality rate from breast cancer (2). To our knowledge, there has been no large-scale analysis of the effectiveness of mammographic screening in African-American and Latino women.Studies of mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 years are complex because younger women have a lower incidence of breast cancer; denser breast tissue (which can lower sensitivity); and on average, faster growing, biologically aggressive cancer. Relative to European-American women, African-American women have lower breast density, faster-growing cancer, and a higher likelihood of dying to breast cancer (3–5). Because the mortality rate from breast cancer in African-American women is higher and mammographic density is typically lower, the benefit from mammography screening is probably higher in African-American and perhaps Latino women than in European-American women. So where is the evidence to recommend against routine mammography screening of African-American and Latino women younger than 50 years?We agree with the USPSTF that change is needed. But the change we call for is the end of one-size-fits-all recommendations and the inclusion of African-American and Latino women in clinical trials testing the benefit of mammographic screening.Victoria L. Seewaldt, MDDuke UniversityDurham, NC 27708References1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716-26, W-236. [PMID: 19920272] MedlineGoogle Scholar2. Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2005;293:1245-56. [PMID: 15755947] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Stuedal A, Ma H, Bernstein L, Pike MC, Ursin G. Does breast size modify the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:621-7. [PMID: 18349279] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH, Bernstein L, Salane M, Parisky YR, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:332-8. [PMID: 12692108] MedlineGoogle Scholar5. Elledge RM, Clark GM, Chamness GC, Osborne CK. Tumor biologic factors and breast cancer prognosis among white, Hispanic, and black women in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:705-12. [PMID: 7908990] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Comments0 CommentsSign In to Submit A Comment Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: From Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.Disclosures: None disclosed. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoScreening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation StatementWhen Evidence Collides With Anecdote, Politics, and Emotion: Breast Cancer ScreeningComments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer Nananda F. Col , Moritz H. Hansen , Baruch Fischhoff , and Steven G. Pauker Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer Anita Ho Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer Diana Pettiti and Ned Calonge Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer Peter B. Dean Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer R. Scott Braithwaite Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer Mitchell H. Gail and Catherine Schairer Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer Colin B. Begg Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer Richard Yoast Metrics Cited ByQuality varies across clinical practice guidelines for mammography screening in women aged 40–49 years as assessed by AGREE and AMSTAR instrumentsWomen's Health, Accountable Care Organizations, and Radiology Practice: Maximizing Radiology's Value Under Health Care ReformWhen Evidence Collides With Anecdote, Politics, and Emotion: Breast Cancer ScreeningThe Editors 20 April 2010Volume 152, Issue 8Page: 541-542KeywordsBreast cancerCancer screeningConflicts of interestDeath ratesHispanic peopleMammographySpecificity ePublished: 20 April 2010 Issue Published: 20 April 2010 CopyrightCopyright © 2010 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF DownloadLoading ...