First randomised trial of treatments for pulmonary disease caused by M avium intracellulare, M malmoense, and M xenopi in HIV negative patients: rifampicin, ethambutol and isoniazid versus rifampicin and ethambutol
Authors: None Research Committee of the British Thoracic Society
Journal: Thorax (2001)

<h3>BACKGROUND</h3> The treatment of pulmonary disease caused by opportunist mycobacteria is controversial. It is uncertain whether in vitro sensitivity testing predicts clinical response in the way it does for<i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>. The literature suggests that the combination of rifampicin (R) and ethambutol (E) is important whereas isoniazid (H) may not be, but to date there have been no published reports of randomised controlled trials in the treatment of these conditions. The British Thoracic Society has conducted the first such trial, a randomised study of two regimens in HIV negative patients with pulmonary disease caused by <i>M avium intracellulare</i> (MAC),<i>M malmoense</i>, and <i>M xenopi</i>. <h3>METHODS</h3> When two positive cultures were confirmed by the Mycobacterium Reference Laboratories for England, Wales and Scotland, the coordinating physician invited the patient9s physician to enrol the patient. Patients were also recruited from Scandinavia. Randomisation to 2 years of treatment with RE or REH was performed from lists held in the coordinator9s office. Clinical, bacteriological, and radiological progress was monitored at set intervals up to 5 years. <h3>RESULTS</h3> From October 1987 to December 1992, 141 physicians entered 223 patients (106 with <i>M malmoense</i>, 75 with MAC, 42 with<i>M xenopi</i>). At entry the RE and REH groups were comparable over a range of demographic and clinical features. For each species there was no significant difference between RE and REH in the number of deaths, but when the three species were combined there were fewer deaths from the mycobacterial disease with RE (1%<i>v</i> 8%, p=0.018, odds ratio 0.10, exact 95% CI 0.00 to 0.76). For <i>M malmoense</i> the failure of treatment/relapse rates did not differ appreciably between the regimens, but for MAC there were fewer failures of treatment/relapses with REH (16% <i>v</i> 41%, p=0.033) With <i>M xenopi </i>there was a non-significant trend in the same direction (5%<i>v</i> 18%, p=0.41) and when all three species were combined there was a significant difference in favour of REH (11%<i>v</i> 22%, p=0.033). There was no correlation between failure of treatment/relapse and in vitro resistance.<i>M xenopi</i> was associated with the greatest mortality (57% at 5 years), MAC was the most difficult to eradicate, and <i>M malmoense</i> had the most favourable outlook (42% known to be alive and cured at 5 years). <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> The results of susceptibility tests performed by the modal resistance method do not correlate with the patient9s response to chemotherapy. RE and REH are tolerated better than previous regimens containing second or third line anti-mycobacterial drugs. Treatment of<i>M malmoense </i>with RE for 2 years is preferable to REH. The addition of H reduces the failure of treatment/relapse rates for MAC and has a tendency to do so also for<i>M xenopi</i>, but there is a suggestion that REH is associated with higher death rates overall. Better regimens are required.