OP0274-PARE EVALUATION OF PATIENT SATISFACTION FOR TELEHEALTH (PHONE AND VIDEO) IN RHEUMATOLOGY OUTPATIENTS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Authors: Y. Oh, A. Hennessey, L. Young, D. Yates, C. Barrett
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2021)

Background: Telehealth via phone (TPhone) or video conference (TVideo) in rheumatology has been a topic of interest for many years. Its use was rapidly expanded due to the international public health emergency of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) outbreak in 2020. Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) swiftly enabled temporary MBS telehealth items on 13 March 2020, currently extended until 31 March 2021 1 . In the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, Antony et al. conducted a single-centre public survey to assess patient perception of rheumatology telehealth. Their results showed that 98.4% of patients consider telehealth acceptable during the pandemic 2 . It is unclear, however, whether this positive perception persists after patients experience a telehealth. In addition, a survey data in 2019 suggested more than half of Australian rheumatologists work in private practice 3 . Therefore, inclusion of private patients will better represent patient perception of telehealth. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. This would determine its feasibility to be integrated in future rheumatology outpatient model. Methods: A questionnaire containing 30 questions was sent to rheumatology patients who attended telehealth appointments at a level 2 public hospital and a local private clinic between April and May 2020. The questionnaires aimed to obtain information on baseline demographics (sex, age, public or private patient, employment status, visual or auditory impairment), appointment details (TPhone or TVideo, usual arrangement for face-to-face (F2F) appointment, cost effectiveness) and appointment satisfaction using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted. Results: The questionnaire was sent to 1452 patients, of which 494 patients responded (34%). Female predominance (77.1%) and a higher proportion of TPhone (79.1%) was seen in the respondents. A majority of patients were existing patients known to the services (90.9%). More than 70% of responses indicated overall satisfaction in specialist care via telehealth, and 88.7% perceived this suitable during a pandemic. Of all respondents, 21.7% were prescribed new medication, and the majority of these patients were confident in taking the new medication after the telehealth appointment. Future acceptability for TPhone was significantly lower in private patients compared to public patients ( p= 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed that higher telehealth satisfaction was associated with needing to take time off work to attend face-to-face appointment ( p = 0.02), perception of cost effectiveness ( p &lt;0.001) and TVideo ( p =0.03). Conclusion: This is the first study which included both public and private rheumatology patients to evaluate patient satisfaction for telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall high level of satisfaction was seen in telehealth most notably associated with its cost effectiveness. A higher percentage of patients who had TVideo compared to TPhone were receptive to future telehealth via TVideo, supportive of the importance of visual cues. This in turn will have significant administrative and technological burdens to coordinate in comparison to a F2F or TPhone review. This qualitative study provides valuable insight of patient perception of telehealth, which has the potential to compliment the traditional rheumatology outpatient model of care following the pandemic. References: [1]COVID-19 Temporary MBS Telehealth Services 2020 [Available from: http://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/Factsheet-TempBB . [2]Antony A, Connelly K, De Silva T, Eades L, Tillett W, Ayoub S, et al. Perspectives of Patients With Rheumatic Diseases in the Early Phase of COVID-19. Arthritis Care &amp; Research. 2020;72(9):1189-95. [3]Association AR. Workforce Survey Exective Summary 2019 2019 [Available from: https://rheumatology.org.au/members/documents/WorkforceSurveyExecutiveSummary-websiteMay2019.pdf . Acknowledgements: University of Queensland Nursing staff at Redcliffe Hospital and Administration officers at Redcliffe &amp; Northside Rheumatology Disclosure of Interests: None declared