Telehealth for older adults with skin disease: a qualitative exploration of dermatologists’ experiences and recommendations for improving care
Authors: I. de Vere Hunt, S. van Egmond, V. Nava, R. Khodosh, J. Lester, A.S. Chiou, E. Linos
Journal: British Journal of Dermatology (2021)

Dear Editor, The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the use of telehealth, defined as the delivery of healthcare via remote technologies,1 with widespread adoption of live-interactive video visits across the USA.2-4 Yet, it is important to avoid exacerbating healthcare disparities for vulnerable populations such as older adults, who traditionally have more technological literacy barriers.5, 6 Our aim was to explore dermatologists' experiences of using telehealth with older adults, in order to identify and summarize recommendations to improve telehealth care. Author I.d.V.H. conducted 23 in-depth, semistructured interviews (February to August 2021) over video with dermatologists who had self-reported experience of caring for adults age > 65 years using telehealth. We conducted an inductive thematic analysis of the full interview transcripts, using a constant comparison and mind-mapping approach.7 This study was approved by the Stanford Institutional Review Board. Of the 23 dermatologists interviewed, 13 were female and 10 were male, with 14 attendings and nine residents from eight different states. Seven participants identified as Asian, four as black or African American and 12 as white. Every dermatologist interviewed for this study thought that telehealth 'is here to stay'. The following core themes regarding dermatologists' experience (E1–E5) of telehealth use with older adults were extracted. E1. Perceived benefits of telehealth for older adults. The perceived benefits of patients being able to stay in their own home for an appointment stretched beyond the context of the pandemic. Examples cited included the reduction in travel time and associated expense, which could be particularly pertinent to older adults with transport limitations, need for assistance from caregivers or mobility issues. E2. Works well for 'stable chronic disease', but concerns about diagnosis of malignant lesions. An inability to perform biopsies or whole-skin exams often made evaluation of potential neoplastic lesions challenging via telehealth. In contrast, situations in which the dermatologist was not dependent on virtual image quality, but rather the subjective patient report, were emphasized as well suited to virtual visits. E3. Technology presents a barrier for many, but not all, older adults. There was considerable variation in experiences, with many examples of issues with technological difficulties arising, although some providers reported being 'impressed and surprised' with how older adults adapted to telehealth. E4. Can't see the whole patient and feel the skin. Practical issues that limit patient examination and procedures were cited as limitations of telehealth and reasons for transition to in-person care. E5. Can be more difficult to communicate virtually. This theme encompasses both personal connection and rapport, and practical communication issues such as 'if the patient speaks a different language', with access to an interpreter being complicated via telehealth. Five themes summarizing recommendations (R1–R5) for use of telehealth with older adults were identified. R1. Give comprehensive instructions ahead of time. This included requests for high-quality photos (and guidelines on how to take them) irrespective of access to video in the telehealth visit, as well as detailed login instructions. R2. Appropriate appointment triage is crucial. Interviewees differed in their opinions regarding how this triage should manifest; some expressed a preference 'to see all new patients in person', while others found telehealth visits an effective adjunct to triage in itself. Frustrations around failure of effective triage for both patient and provider were cited. R3. Don't make assumptions about patient comfort with technology. Although there were many accounts of technological issues arising with elderly patients, many of the providers' preconceptions about older adults' ability to use telehealth were not borne out in practice. R4. Important to manage patient expectations about what can be achieved in a telehealth visit. The importance of patient education regarding what can be achieved in a telehealth visit was emphasized: 'the patient's perception was suddenly [that] we could take care of things on the computer and they didn't have to come in, which of course turns out not to be true'. R5. Need to make telehealth accessible for all. There is a potential paradox to telehealth access: although telehealth offers tremendous capacity to improve healthcare access, those who might benefit most are often least well equipped to access the technology required. Some participants felt optimistic about the ability of the future telehealth landscape to increase accessibility, particularly in rural areas, for example with use of 'telemedicine kiosks' in pharmacies suggested. See Table 1 for categorization of themes and illustrative quotations. E1. Perceived benefits of telehealth for older adults R1. Give comprehensive instructions ahead of time E2. Works well for 'stable chronic disease', but concerns about diagnosis of malignant lesions R2. Appropriate appointment triage is crucial E3. Technology presents a barrier for many, but not all, older adults R3. Don't make assumptions about patient comfort with technology E4. Can't see the whole patient and feel the skin R4. Important to manage patient expectations about what can be achieved in a telehealth visit E5. Can be more difficult to communicate virtually R5. Need to make telehealth accessible for all The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed healthcare systems. We have the opportunity to bring together technological innovations with a commitment to reducing digital health disparities, so that telehealth meets the needs of vulnerable groups with lower technological literacy. We call for active optimization of telehealth systems along with patient education to ensure usability for all. Isabella Joy de Vere Hunt : Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (equal); Methodology (lead); Project administration (equal); Writing-original draft (lead). Sven van Egmond: Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (lead); Writing-review & editing (equal). Vanessa Nava: Formal analysis (equal); Project administration (lead); Validation (equal); Writing-review & editing (equal). Rita Khodosh : Formal analysis (equal); Validation (equal); Writing-review & editing (equal). Jenna Lester: Formal analysis (equal); Validation (equal); Writing-review & editing (equal). Albert Chiou: Formal analysis (equal); Validation (equal); Writing-review & editing (equal). Eleni Linos: Conceptualization (lead); Formal analysis (equal); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (lead); Methodology (lead); Supervision (lead); Validation (equal); Writing-review & editing (lead).