The Durability of EUS-Guided Chemoablation of Mucinous Pancreatic Cysts: A Long-Term Follow-Up of the CHARM trial
Authors: Courtney Lester, Leonard Walsh, Kayla M. Hartz, Abraham Mathew, John M. Levenick, Brandy D. Headlee, Heather D. Heisey, James H. Birkholz, Matthew Dixon, Jennifer L. Maranki, Niraj J. Gusani, Charles E. Dye, Matthew T. Moyer
Journal: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2021)

Pancreatic cancer has known precursor lesions with potential to develop into malignancy over time. At least 20% of pancreatic cancer evolves from mucinous cystic neoplasms and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, which are often discovered incidentally.1Distler M. Aust D. Weitz J. et al.Precursor lesions for sporadic pancreatic cancer: PanIN, IPMN, and MCN.Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 474905Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar,2Crippa S. Castillo C.F. Salvia R. et al.Mucin-producing neoplasms of the pancreas: an analysis of distinguishing clinical and epidemiologic characteristics.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010; 8: 213-219Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (231) Google Scholar Current guidelines for the management of mucinous cystic neoplasms and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms include long-term surveillance, which is expensive and nontherapeutic, or surgical resection, which is associated with major risk and may not be an option for patients with significant concomitant illness.3Amini N. Spolverato G. Kim Y. et al.Trends in hospital volume and failure to rescue for pancreatic surgery.J Gastrointest Surg. 2015; 19: 1581-1592Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided chemoablation of pancreatic cysts has emerged as an attractive alternative. An innovative and minimally invasive technique, EUS-guided chemoablation has proven efficacy and a superior safety profile to surgery. Although several promising reports4Moyer M.T. Sharzehi S. Mathew A. et al.The safety and efficacy of an alcohol-free pancreatic cyst ablation protocol.Gastroenterology. 2017; 153: 1295-1303Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar, 5Moyer M.T. Maranki J.L. DeWitt J.M. EUS-guided pancreatic cyst ablation: a clinical and technical review.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019; 21: 19Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar, 6Canakis A. Law R. Baron T. An updated review on ablative treatment of pancreatic cystic lesions.Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 91: 520-526Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar, 7Oh H.C. Seo D.W. Song T.J. et al.Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided ethanol lavage with paclitaxel injection treats patients with pancreatic cysts.Gastroenterology. 2011; 140: 172-179Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar on the short-term outcomes of EUS-guided chemoablation have been published, its long-term durability is unclear. In a recent, large cohort study, Choi et al8Choi J.H. Seo D.W. Song T.J. et al.Long-term outcomes after endoscopic ultrasound-guided ablation of pancreatic cysts.Endoscopy. 2017; 49: 866-873Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar reported that 98.3% of patients with completely resolved pancreatic cysts following EUS-guided chemoablation with paclitaxel maintained their results at 6 years. Although these findings do indicate the excellent durability of chemoablation, this study included serous cystadenomas and pseudocysts, which are generally low-risk and do not require intervention. Our study, therefore, is the first to report exclusively on the long-term outcomes of EUS-guided chemoablation of mucinous or indeterminate type cysts. Here, we provide a long-term follow-up report of the Chemotherapy for Ablation and Resolution of Mucinous pancreatic cysts (CHARM) trial to assess the durability of treatment response following EUS-guided chemoablation. This study evaluates patients who were treated in the CHARM trial (NCT01475331) at the Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. The complete study design and eligibility criteria of the CHARM trial have been reported elsewhere.4Moyer M.T. Sharzehi S. Mathew A. et al.The safety and efficacy of an alcohol-free pancreatic cyst ablation protocol.Gastroenterology. 2017; 153: 1295-1303Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar Briefly, in a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, patients with eligible 1.5–5 cm mucinous-type pancreatic cysts were randomized to either ethanol or saline lavage. Following lavage, all cysts were infused with a chemotherapeutic admixture of paclitaxel and gemcitabine. At 12 months postablation, patients underwent radiographic imaging, and CHARM treatment response was assessed. Patients included in the present long-term analysis are those who had imaging performed at least 12 months following the CHARM treatment response assessment. The most recent images available for each patient were used for this report. One study-involved radiologist read the baseline, 12-month, and long-term follow-up images for each of the included patients. Cysts were measured in at least 2 dimensions, and cyst volume was calculated using V=43πr3, where r is the mean cyst radius. Treatment response was defined according to percent reduction in cyst volume from baseline as follows: complete response, ≥95% reduction in cyst volume; partial response, 94%–75% reduction; and nonresponse, <75% reduction. Of the 39 patients treated in the CHARM trial, 36 were included in the long-term analysis. At baseline, mean cyst diameter was 27.6 mm, and most cysts were clinically diagnosed as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (69.4%) or mucinous cystic neoplasms (22.2%). Demographics of the sample and additional baseline cyst characteristics are presented in Supplementary Table 1. Follow-up imaging was performed at a mean of 36.5 months (range, 20–78) following CHARM treatment response assessment. Of the 23 patients who achieved complete resolution at the initial assessment, 20 (87.0%) sustained those results at their latest follow-up. The other 3 patients had largely maintained their response, demonstrating 91%–93% reductions in cyst volume at follow-up. All cyst volumes from baseline to follow-up are displayed in Figure 1. Several initially persistent cysts proceeded toward resolution throughout the follow-up period: 4 cysts (30.8%) classified as partial responders (n = 3) or nonresponders (n = 1) at the CHARM assessment were found to have completely resolved at latest follow-up, and 2 cysts initially classified as nonresponders achieved partial resolution. One cyst regressed from a partial responder to nonresponder. The distribution of treatment responses at 12 months postablation and at long-term follow-up is shown in Supplementary Table 2. In this report, we show that complete cyst resolution after EUS-guided chemoablation with paclitaxel and gemcitabine is durable, with 87% of complete responders at 12 months having maintained resolution at their latest follow-up. Although our results highlight the long-term durability of a complete treatment response, the data also suggest the possibility of protracted treatment effects, because 31% of patients who do not achieve complete response initially may continue toward resolution. The present study does have notable limitations. First, 2 of the patients lost to follow-up had initially achieved complete resolution, so it is possible that the absence of their long-term data affected the results. In addition, the CHARM trial used a small sample size and strict eligibility criteria because of its investigational nature. Therefore, the results presented here may not be representative of all mucinous-type pancreatic cysts. Overall, these results are encouraging and clarify a key area of uncertainty surrounding EUS-guided ablation, increasing its appeal as a safe, low-cost, minimally invasive procedure that provides long-term control for premalignant pancreatic cysts. Although there is currently no long-term, prospective data to make the claim that EUS-guided chemoablation prevents pancreatic adenocarcinoma, our results demonstrate that chemoablation inhibits further progression of treated cysts over time and, thus, prevents invasive surgery. In addition, because surveillance following chemoablation is typically recommended at 12 months and then as per the new cyst dimensions thereafter, patients with complete resolution, and even many with partial resolution, experience a substantial reduction in post-treatment surveillance. EUS-guided chemoablation is, therefore, an attractive and effective treatment modality for appropriately selected patients, including those who are unable or unwilling to undergo major surgical resection. Supplementary Table 1Baseline Demographics and Cyst Characteristics (N = 36)Female, n (%)22 (61.1)Mean age (SD, range), y70.0 (10.4; 45.0–83.0)Mean maximal cyst diameter (SD, range), mm27.6 (7.5; 15.5–49.0)Mean cyst volume (SD, range), mL10.5 (9.4; 1.9–38.8)Cyst location, n (%) Head17 (47.2) Body16 (44.4) Tail1 (2.8) Neck2 (5.6)Presumed diagnosis, n (%) MCN8 (22.2) IPMN25 (69.4) Indeterminate3 (8.3)Multilocular, n (%)9 (25.0)IPMN, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms; MCN, mucinous cystic neoplasms; SD, standard deviation. Open table in a new tab Supplementary Table 2Treatment Response at 12 Months Postablation Versus Treatment Response at Long-Term Follow-Up Imaging12 months postablationLong-term follow-upTreatment response, n (%) Complete response23 (63.9)24 (66.7) Partial response7 (19.4)8 (22.2) Nonresponse6 (16.7)4 (11.1) Open table in a new tab IPMN, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms; MCN, mucinous cystic neoplasms; SD, standard deviation.