Comparative molecular profiling of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the head (H) versus body/tail (B/T) and the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME).
Authors: Maen Abdelrahim, Anup Kasi, Yasmine Baca, Joanne Xiu, Phillip Walker, Wolfgang Michael Korn, Emil Lou, Anthony Frank Shields, Benjamin Adam Weinberg
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2022)

598 Background: PDAC of the H and B/T differ in embryonic origin, cell composition, blood supply, lymphatic and venous drainage, and innervation. H tumors tend cause symptoms earlier and to present at earlier stages compared to B/T cancers. The impact of PDAC tumor location on patient presentation and survival has been shown in large national data-based analyses, although with conflicting results. We aimed to compare the molecular and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) profiles of PDAC of the H vs. B/T. Methods: A total of 3499 PDAC samples were analyzed via next-generation sequencing (NGS) of RNA (whole transcriptome, NovaSeq), DNA (NextSeq, 592 genes or NovaSeq, whole exome sequencing) and immunohistochemistry (IHC, Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). RNA deconvolution was performed using QuantiSeq (Finotello 2019, Genome Medicine) to quantify the immune cell infiltration. Pathway gene enrichment analyses were done using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA, Subramaniam 2015, PNAS). Significance was determined as p values adjusted for multiple correction (q) of &lt; 0.05. Results: Anatomic subsites of PDAC tumors were grouped by primary tumor sites into H (N = 2058) or B/T (N = 1384). There were significantly more metastatic tumors profiled from H vs. B/T (57% vs. 44%, p &lt; 0.001). KRAS mutations (93.8% vs. 90.2%), genomic loss of heterozygosity (12.7% vs. 9.1%), and several copy number alterations ( FGF3, FGF4, FGF19, CCND1, ZNF703, FLT4, MUTYH, TNFRS14) trended higher in B/T when compared to H (p &lt; 0.05 but q &gt; 0.05). GNAS mutations (2.2% vs. 0.7%) trended higher in H vs. B/T (p &lt; 0.05). No significant difference in immuno-oncology (IO) markers (TMB, PD-L1, MSI-H) were observed, but expression analysis of IO-related genes showed significantly higher expression of CTLA4 and PDCD1 in H (q &lt; 0.05, fold change 1.2 and 1.3) and IDO1 and PDCD1LG2 expression trended higher in B/T (p &lt; 0.05, fold change 0.95). When comparing median cell abundance values as part of TIME analysis, H had increased immune infiltration of B cells (0.045 vs. 0.043), M2 macrophages (0.035 vs. 0.032), neutrophils (0.056 vs. 0.052), NK cells (0.027 vs. 0.026), CD8+ T cells (% &gt; 0: 48.2% vs. 43.2%), while B/T had increased infiltration of M1 macrophages (0.035 vs. 0.032) (all q &lt; 0.05). GSEA showed enrichment of CTLA4 (normalized enrichment score (NES) 1.6, false discovery rate (FDR) 0.19) and primary immunodeficiency pathway enrichment (NES 1.7, FDR 0.11) in H. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is one of the largest cohort of PDAC tumors subjected to broad molecular profiling. Differences in IO-related gene expression and TIME cell distribution suggest that response to IO therapies may differ in PDAC arising from H vs B/T. Subtle differences in the genomic profliles of H vs. B/T tumors were also observed.