POS1459-HPR IDENTIFYING MEANINGFUL CHANGE IN THE RA FLARE QUESTIONNAIRE SCORES IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
Authors: S.J. Bartlett, C. Bingham, O. Schieir, M.F. Valois, G. Hazlewood, J. Pope, C. Thorne, D. Tin, C. Hitchon, L. Bessette, G. Boire, E. Keystone, V. Bykerk
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2021)

<h3>Background:</h3> The RA-FQ is a patient-reported measure of current disease activity in RA that can be used to identify disease flares. The RA-FQ queries pain, physical function, fatigue, stiffness, and participation and yields a score from 0-50. We previously reported on reliability, validity, and responsiveness. <h3>Objectives:</h3> To identify changes in RA-FQ that represent minimal and meaningful improvement or worsening from the perspective of people with RA, treating rheumatologists, and in relation to disease activity indices. We hypothesized that <h3>Methods:</h3> Data were from adults with early RA (sx &lt;1 year) enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort, a prospective study of real-world patients treated across Canada. Participants completed the RA-FQ, Patient Global, and RA transition item since last visit (a little vs. a lot better or worse or same) between consecutive 3- and 6-month visits. Rheumatologists recorded joint counts, MD Global, and change in RA. We compared mean change across improvement and worsening using patient anchors and disease activity indicators. <h3>Results:</h3> The 808 adults were mostly white (84%) women (71%) with a mean (SD) age of 55 (15) and moderate-high CDAI level (85%) at enrollment. Most (79%) reported their RA had changed; 59% were better and 20% worse. Patients who were <i>a lot worse</i> had a mean increase of 8.9 points whereas those who rated themselves as <i>a lot better</i> had a -6.0 decrease on the RA-FQ (Figure 1). Minimal worsening and improvement were associated with 4.7 and -1.8 change in RA-FQ scores, respectively, while patients who rated their RA unchanged had stable RA-FQ scores (Table 1). Similar changes were evident in CDAI, SDAI, and DAS indices (Table 1). Larger differences were observed with patient vs. physician global scores and tender vs. swollen joints. Across measures, the change associated with worsening was greater than for improvement. Results supported all prespecified hypotheses ab. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> In this large cohort of adults with ERA, the RA-FQ was responsive to change and generally distinguish between minimal and meaningful improvement and worsening. These data add to a growing evidence demonstrating robust psychometric properties of the RA-FQ and offer initial guidance about the amount of change associated with improvement or worsening, supporting its use in RA care, research and decision-making. <h3>Acknowledgements:</h3> The CATCH study was designed and implemented by the investigators and financially supported through unrestricted research grants from: Amgen and Pfizer Canada - Founding sponsors since January 2007; AbbVie Corporation and Hoffmann-LaRoche since 2011; Medexus Inc. since 2013;, Merck Canada since 2017, Sandoz Canada, Biopharmaceuticals since 2019,Gilead Sciences Canada since 2020 and Fresenius Kabi Canada Ltd. since 2021. Previously funded by Janssen Biotech from 2011-2016, UCB Canada and Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada from 2011-2018, Sanofi Genzyme from 2016-2017, and Eli Lilly Canada from 2016-2020. <h3>Disclosure of Interests:</h3> None declared