Assessment of physician perceptions of pediatric palliative care for children with cancer in Latin America.
Authors: Michael McNeil, Bella Ehrlich, Marisol Bustamante, Veronica Dussel, Paola Friedrich, Ximena Garcia Quintero, Wendy Cristhyna Gomez Garcia, Dylan E. Graetz, Erica Kaye, Monika Metzger, Carla Vittoria Sabato Danon, Justin N. Baker, Asya Agulnik
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2021)

10053 Background: While great strides have transpired in pediatric cancer management in high-income countries (HICs), more than 80% of all children with cancer live in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), where fewer than 20% will be cured. The World Health Organization (WHO) has stated that early integration of palliative care is an ethical responsibility in the management of children with life-limiting illness. While structural barriers impact the ability to deliver pediatric palliative care (PPC), underlying stigma also prevents early integration of PPC. Methods: The Assessing Doctor’s Attitudes on Palliative Treatment (ADAPT) survey was created for physicians of all specialties who care for children with cancer, initially used in Eurasia. Survey questions evaluated provider perceptions on timing of palliative care integration, scope of palliative treatment, physician responsibility, and ethical issues. This survey was adapted for use in Latin America, including translation to Spanish and reviewed by regional palliative care specialists for syntax, comprehension, and cultural relevance. The survey was then distributed to physicians treating children with cancer in the region. To assess provider’s perspectives on palliative care, we used fifteen statements from the WHO 2018 guidelines, describing general palliative care principles. Results are reported as percent of alignment with guidelines. Results: A total of 1,039 participants from 16 countries in Latin America completed the survey, with a median country response rate of 66% (range 26%-100%). Thirty-six specialties were represented with 34% general pediatricians and 23% pediatric hematologist/oncologists. The majority (59%) had received no PPC training and 37% had no access to PPC experts for consultation in their practice setting. On average, provider’s perspectives on PPC were aligned with the WHO guidelines (81% alignment, range 53%-96%). However, almost half (42%) felt that the integration of pediatric palliative occurred too late in the course of treatment. Additionally, less than half (47%) of respondents felt comfortable addressing the physical symptoms of their patients, 33% felt comfortable addressing emotional symptoms, and only 26% felt comfortable addressing grief and bereavement for the patient’s family. The most common barriers identified were a lack of home-based services (87%), a lack of physician knowledge on the role of PPC (84%), and physician discomfort in discussing palliative care with families (81%). Nearly all (95%) wanted more training in PPC. Conclusions: Most physicians who completed the survey were not confident in providing symptomatic and supportive care for their patients and families. This study will guide targeted interventions for education in PPC for physicians in Latin America as well as interventions to address barriers which impede earlier palliative care integration in the region.