POS1091 KNEE JOINT DISTRACTION RESULTS IN MRI CARTILAGE THICKNESS INCREASE UP TO TEN YEARS AFTER TREATMENT
Authors: M. Jansen, S. Mastbergen, T. D. Turmezei, J. W. Mackay, F. Lafeber
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2021)

Background: Knee joint distraction (KJD) is a joint-preserving treatment option for younger (age &lt;65 years) knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. It has shown clinical improvement for up to nine years after treatment. Radiographs and MRI scans have previously shown cartilage regeneration activity, especially in the first two years after treatment. However, MRIs have not been evaluated more than five years after this treatment. Objectives: To evaluate MRI cartilage thickness up to ten years after KJD treatment. Methods: Patients (n=20) with end-stage knee OA, indicated for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but &lt;60 years old, were treated with KJD. 3T MRIs with 3D spoiled gradient recalled imaging sequence with fat suppression (SPGR-fs) were acquired before and one, two, five, seven and ten years after surgical treatment. Stradview v6.0 was used for semi-automatic cartilage segmentation; wxRegSurf v18 was used for surface registration. MATLAB R2020a and the SurfStat MATLAB package were used for data analysis and visualization. For changes over time, linear mixed models were used. Two separate linear regression models were used to show the influence of baseline Kellgren-Lawrence grade and sex on the changes over time. Statistical significance was calculated with statistical parametric mapping; a p-value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Since KJD has previously shown significant results mostly in the patients’ most affected compartment (MAC), patients were separated in two groups based on whether their MAC was the medial or lateral compartment. Results: The MAC was predominantly the medial side (medial MAC n=18; lateral n=2). The 18 patients with a medial MAC all had MRI scans at baseline, one and two years after treatment. After two years, some patients were lost to follow-up, decreasing data availability at five (n=15), seven (n=11) and ten years (n=7). Figure 1 (top) shows the average cartilage thickness at the different time points for all medial MAC patients together. One and two years after treatment the cartilage in the medial weight-bearing region was on average thicker than before treatment. While from five years after treatment the cartilage thickness gradually decreased, even at ten years the medial cartilage thickness seemed slightly higher than pre-treatment. Figure 1 (bottom) shows cartilage thickness changes compared to baseline for patients with a medial MAC. Patients with a lateral MAC showed a similar pattern, with the biggest changes showing on the lateral side. As indicated by the dark blue areas, the medial femoral cartilage thickness increase, which was up to 0.5 mm after one year and 0.6 mm after two years, was largely statistically significant at both these time points. While the medial tibia showed an increase of up to 0.5 mm at these time points as well, this was not statistically significant at two years. Surprisingly, long-term results showed areas of the lateral (less affected) compartment were significantly thicker, up to 0.7 mm, compared to pre-treatment in both the femur and tibia compared to baseline. Kellgren-Lawrence grade and sex were shown to influence the changes, albeit not statistically significantly. Patients with a higher Kellgren-Lawrence grade and male sex showed a higher short-term (one and two year) but a lower long-term (seven and ten year) cartilage thickness increase. Conclusion: KJD treatment results in significant short-term cartilage regeneration in the most affected compartment. While after two years this initial gain in cartilage thickness is gradually lost, likely as a result of natural progression, even ten years after treatment the cartilage is thicker than before treatment. In the less affected compartment, a delayed cartilage response seems to take place, with significantly increased cartilage thickness in the long term. In conclusion, in these young OA patients indicated for TKA, KJD results in femoral and tibial cartilaginous tissue regeneration both short- and long-term and in both sides of the joint. Disclosure of Interests: None declared.