ARC-6: A phase 1b/2, open-label, randomized platform study to evaluate efficacy and safety of etrumadenant (AB928)-based treatment combinations in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Authors: Sumit Kumar Subudhi, Johanna C. Bendell, Michael Anthony Carducci, Lisa M. Kopp, Jennifer Scott, Michele M Grady, Olivia Gardner, David R Wise
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2021)

5039 Background: Standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy may contribute to immunosuppression by elevating intratumoral levels of adenosine, activating the A 2a and A 2b receptors on immune cells. Extracellular adenosine is primarily produced by the enzyme CD73; in prostate cancer, additional adenosine is also produced by the highly expressed protein, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). Etrumadenant (etruma) is an orally bioavailable, small-molecule, selective dual adenosine receptor antagonist and has been well tolerated in dose escalation studies as monotherapy or combined with chemo/immunotherapy. Adenosine axis inhibition combined with SOC regimens and/or immunotherapy may have a synergistic effect on the induction of sustained antitumor immunity against mCRPC. Initial results from the etruma + zimberelimab (zim; antiPD-1 mAb) + docetaxel (doc) arm are presented herein. Methods: ARC-6 (NCT04381832) is an ongoing, phase 1b/2, open-label, multicohort platform study to evaluate efficacy and safety of etruma combination therapy. All eligible patients (pts) have mCRPC that has progressed on androgen deprivation therapy and are checkpoint inhibitor-naive; additionally, for this arm, pts must be androgen signaling inhibitor (ASI)-experienced and taxane-naive. Study pts receive 150 mg etruma orally once daily + 360 mg zim IV every 3 weeks + SOC doc (EZD). The primary objectives are to evaluate safety and antitumor activity (prostate-specific antigen [PSA], radiographic, and composite response rates) of EZD. PSA levels are assessed every 3 weeks, and radiographic scans are performed every 12 weeks. PSA response-evaluable pts have baseline (BL) + ≥2 consecutive post-BL PSA assessments; radiographic response-evaluable pts have RECIST measurable or non-measurable disease per BL imaging + ≥1 post-BL radiographic assessment. Results: As of 22Jan2021, 17 pts have received EZD in phase 1b; 14 are PSA response-evaluable and 8 are radiographic response-evaluable. 15 (88%) pts reported treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs); the most common ( &gt; 30%) were lymphocyte count decreased and neutrophil count decreased (7 pts each; 41%), and hyponatremia and alopecia (6 pts each; 35%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related TEAEs were reported by 9 pts (53%). As of 22Jan2021, 16 pts were continuing treatment; median time on EZD for all pts was 9.9 weeks (0.127.4+ weeks). In response-evaluable pts, PSA response rate was 36% (5/14), radiographic response rate was 38% (3/8; 1 CR), and the composite response rate was 43% (6/14). Conclusions: Phase 1b results indicate that EZD treatment in pts with mCRPC had a manageable safety profile and was associated with clinical benefit. Having met phase 2 advancement criteria, randomized pt enrollment to EZD vs. doc is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04381832.