POS0637 INCIDENCE AND DETERMINANTS ASSOCIATED WITH RETRANSITIONING FROM BIOSIMILAR SB4 TO ORIGINATOR ETANERCEPT
Authors: R. Meijboom, H. Gardarsdottir, M. Becker, S. Ten Wolde, T. Egberts, T. Giezen
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2021)

<h3>Background:</h3> The market entry of the etanercept biosimilar SB4 (BS-ETA) reduced prices; and, therefore, many patients in clinical practice are transitioned from originator etanercept (OR-ETA) to BS-ETA. However, previous studies demonstrated that 2.7-17.1% of patients who transitioned from OR-ETA to BS-SB4, retransitioned to OR-ETA (i.e. restarted originator), which might reduce the (financial) benefits of biosimilars. Insight in the incidence of retransitioning and characteristics of patients who are most likely to retransition, can provide lessons to clinicians for successful introduction of biosimilars. <h3>Objectives:</h3> To assess the incidence of retransitioning from BS-ETA to OR-ETA in patients with a rheumatic disease (RD) and to identify determinants thereof. <h3>Methods:</h3> All patients diagnosed with RD who transitioned in 2016 from OR-ETA to BS-ETA in a Dutch general teaching hospital (the Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem/Hoofddorp) were included in this cohort study. All patients were followed until retransitioning, switching to another biological, discontinuing of biological treatment death, loss to follow up or until censor date. The incidence of retransitioning and duration of BS-ETA use was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential determinants for retransitioning, including age, gender, BS-SB4 dosing interval, use of other biologicals prior to OR-ETA, initiation or intensification of corticosteroids or immunomodulators, hospitalisations and the number of outpatient visits to the rheumatology department, were assessed in a nested case control study, using (multivariate) conditional logistic regression. <h3>Results:</h3> In total, 342 patients (median age 57.8 years, 53.5% females, median follow-up 2.7 years) were included. 9.4% of patients had retransitioned to OR-ETA one year after transitioning. Additionally, one year after transitioning 69.7% of patients were still treated with BS-ETA, 3.8% switched to other treatment and 17.1% discontinued all biological treatment. At the end of follow-up (median 2,7 years), 46 patients (13.5%) retransitioned to OR-ETA; median time until retransitioning was 0.50 (IQR 0.98) years. Univariate determinants for retransitioning included female gender (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.18-7.74), initiating or intensifying corticosteroids or immunomodulators (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.38-7.63) and number of visits to the rheumatology department (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.70-3.17). Based on the multivariate analysis, only the number of visits to the rheumatology department was associated with retransitioning (OR 2.19 95% CI 1.60-3.00), as demonstrated in Table 1. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> When introducing BS-SB4 in clinical care, clinicians should anticipate on about one in seven patients retransitioning to OR-ETA. These patients might be identified prior to retransitioning based on their contacts to the rheumatology department. Information specifically aiming for their concerns might prevent them from retransitioning. However, more qualitative studies are needed to explore patients' underlying reasons for retransitioning, in order to improve the introduction of biosimilars in clinical care. <h3>Disclosure of Interests:</h3> None declared