Phase 1 trial of seclidemstat (SP-2577) in patients with relapsed/refractory Ewing sarcoma.
Authors: Damon R. Reed, Sant P. Chawla, Bhuvana Setty, Leo Mascarenhas, Paul A. Meyers, Jonathan Metts, Douglas James Harrison, David Loeb, Brian D. Crompton, David S. Wages, David D. Stenehjem, Daniela Y. Santiesteban, Nadeem Q. Mirza, Steven G. DuBois
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2021)

11514 Background: Ewing sarcoma (ES), a rare bone and soft tissue sarcoma mainly of adolescents and young adults, is characterized by a chromosomal translocation resulting in a fusion oncoprotein. Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) has been shown to associate with the fusion oncoprotein and promote oncogenic transcriptional activity making LSD1 an attractive target for ES treatment. Seclidemstat is a novel, selective, reversible oral LSD1 inhibitor capable of inhibiting both LSD1’s catalytic and scaffolding functions. This is the first report of an LSD1 inhibitor in a Phase 1 trial focused exclusively on ES. Methods: SALA-002-EW16 is a Phase 1 trial of single agent seclidemstat in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) ES. This report describes the completed monotherapy dose escalation. Pts &gt; 12 years received oral SP-2577 twice daily in 28-day cycles under fasting conditions at the assigned dose level. The primary objective was safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives include to determine maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Results: As of December 30, 2020, 27 pts with R/R ES were enrolled. Pts received escalating doses of SP-2577 at 75 (n = 1), 150 (n = 2), 300 (n = 4), 600 (n = 6), 900 (n = 8), or 1200 mg PO BID (n = 6). The median age was 25 years (range 15–68), 63% were male, and pts had received a median of 3 (range 2–12) prior systemic therapies. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common ( &gt; 5%) grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were vomiting (15%), abdominal pain (11%), and hypokalemia (11%). One pt (4%) with grade 3 pancreatitis reported a grade 4 AE of elevated lipase. All remaining grade 3 TRAEs, including hematological TRAEs, were reported in only one pt each. Four pts discontinued study for an AE (weight loss, pancreatitis, vomiting, abdominal pain). Three pts had a dose reduction. The first cycle dose-limiting toxicities were gastrointestinal-related AEs observed in 2 pts at 1200 mg BID. Thus, the MTD/RP2D was established as 900 mg BID. Peak plasma concentrations occurred at a median of 4 hours (h) post-dose and median terminal half-life was 6 h; exposure was dose proportional through 900 mg BID. One pt at 600 mg BID achieved a reduction in target lesions starting at end of C2 with further target lesion tumor shrinkage through end of C4 and C6 (maximum 76% tumor shrinkage) with coincident new non-target lesion appearance at end of C2. Of pts evaluable for response at the end of C2 (12 pts), two additional pts (16.7%) at 600 mg BID and 900 mg BID had overall stable disease. Conclusions: Seclidemstat has a manageable safety profile with proof-of-concept preliminary activity in heavily pretreated pts with relapsed/refractory ES. These data support the planned Phase 2 expansion of seclidemstat as single agent and in combination with chemotherapy in ES and other sarcomas that share similar translocations. Clinical trial information: NCT03600649.