Effectiveness of App-Delivered, Tailored Self-management Support for Adults With Lower Back Pain–Related Disability
Authors: Louise Fleng Sandal, Kerstin Bach, Cecilie K. Øverås, Malene Jagd Svendsen, Tina Dalager, Jesper Stejnicher Drongstrup Jensen, Atle Kongsvold, Anne Lovise Nordstoga, Ellen Marie Bardal, Ilya Ashikhmin, Karen Wood, Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen, Mette Jensen Stochkendahl, Barbara I. Nicholl, Nirmalie Wiratunga, Kay Cooper, Jan Hartvigsen, Per Kjær, Gisela Sjøgaard, Tom I. L. Nilsen, Frances S. Mair, Karen Søgaard, Paul Jarle Mork
Journal: JAMA Internal Medicine (2021)

<h3>Importance</h3> Lower back pain (LBP) is a prevalent and challenging condition in primary care. The effectiveness of an individually tailored self-management support tool delivered via a smartphone app has not been rigorously tested. <h3>Objective</h3> To investigate the effectiveness ofselfBACK, an evidence-based, individually tailored self-management support system delivered through an app as an adjunct to usual care for adults with LBP-related disability. <h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3> This randomized clinical trial with an intention-to-treat data analysis enrolled eligible individuals who sought care for LBP in a primary care or an outpatient spine clinic in Denmark and Norway from March 8 to December 14, 2019. Participants were 18 years or older, had nonspecific LBP, scored 6 points or higher on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and had a smartphone and access to email. <h3>Interventions</h3> TheselfBACK app provided weekly recommendations for physical activity, strength and flexibility exercises, and daily educational messages. Self-management recommendations were tailored to participant characteristics and symptoms. Usual care included advice or treatment offered to participants by their clinician. <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> Primary outcome was the mean difference in RMDQ scores between the intervention group and control group at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included average and worst LBP intensity levels in the preceding week as measured on the numerical rating scale, ability to cope as assessed with the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, fear-avoidance belief as assessed by the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, cognitive and emotional representations of illness as assessed by the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, health-related quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire, physical activity level as assessed by the Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale, and overall improvement as assessed by the Global Perceived Effect scale. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 461 participants were included in the analysis; the population had a mean [SD] age of 47.5 [14.7] years and included 255 women (55%). Of these participants, 232 were randomized to the intervention group and 229 to the control group. By the 3-month follow-up, 399 participants (87%) had completed the trial. The adjusted mean difference in RMDQ score between the 2 groups at 3 months was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.06-1.51;<i>P</i> = .03), favoring theselfBACK intervention. The percentage of participants who reported a score improvement of at least 4 points on the RMDQ was 52% in the intervention group vs 39% in the control group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.15-2.70;<i>P</i> = .01). <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> Among adults who sought care for LBP in a primary care or an outpatient spine clinic, those who used theselfBACK system as an adjunct to usual care had reduced pain-related disability at 3 months. The improvement in pain-related disability was small and of uncertain clinical significance. Process evaluation may provide insights into refining theselfBACK app to increase its effectiveness. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03798288