Prognostic performance of 7 biomarkers compared to liver biopsy in early alcohol-related liver disease
Authors: Ditlev Nytoft Rasmussen, Maja Thiele, Stine Johansen, Maria Kjærgaard, Katrine Prier Lindvig, Mads Israelsen, Steen Antonsen, Sönke Detlefsen, Aleksander Krag, Ema Anastasiadou, Manimozhian Arumugam, Peer Bork, Torben Hansen, Christina Hartoft, Hans Israelsen, Morten Karsdal, Cristina Legido-Quigley, Hans Olav Melberg, Maja Thiele, Jonel Trebicka, Aleksander Krag, Peer Bork, Mathias Mann, Jelle Matthijnssens, Aleksander Krag, Torben Hansen
Journal: Journal of Hepatology (2021)

•462 patients with compensated ALD experienced 84 liver-related events during a median of 4.1 years of follow-up, and 76 patients died.•Elastography and the ELF test are accurate prognostic tests and outperform biopsy-verified fibrosis stage.•3-5% of patients with F0-1, liver stiffness by FibroScan <10 kPa, or ELF test <9.8 experienced liver-related events during follow up.•This increased to 53–64% of patients with F3-4, liver stiffness >15 kPa, or ELF >10.5.•The hazard ratio for liver-related events was 8 for patients with liver stiffness of 10-15 kPa, and 28 for >15 kPa. Background & AimsAlcohol is the most common cause of liver-related mortality and morbidity. We therefore aimed to assess and compare the prognostic performance of elastography and blood-based markers to predict time to the first liver-related event, severe infection, and all-cause mortality in patients with a history of excess drinking.MethodsWe performed a prospective cohort study in patients with early, compensated alcohol-related liver disease. At baseline, we obtained a liver biopsy, transient elastography (TE), 2-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE), enhanced liver fibrosis test (ELF), FibroTest, fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), non-alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis score (NFS) and Forns index. We compared C-statistics and time-dependent AUC for prognostication. We used validated cut-off points to create 3 risk groups for each test: low, intermediate and high risk.ResultsWe followed 462 patients for a median of 49 months (IQR 31–70). Median age was 57 years, 76% were males, 20% had advanced fibrosis. Eighty-four patients (18%) developed a liver-related event after a median of 18 months (7-34). TE had the highest prognostic accuracy, with a C-statistic of 0.876, and time-dependent AUC at 5 years of 0.889, comparable to 2D-SWE and ELF. TE, ELF and 2D-SWE outperformed FibroTest, FIB4, NFS, Forns index and biopsy-verified fibrosis stage. Compared to patients with TE <10 kPa, the hazard ratios for liver-related events for TE 10–15 kPa were 8.1 (3.2–20.4), and 27.9 (13.8–56.8) for TE >15 kPa. Periods of excessive drinking during follow-up increased the risk of progressing to liver-related events, except for patients in the low-risk groups.ConclusionTE, ELF and 2D-SWE are highly accurate prognostic markers in patients with alcohol-related liver disease. Easy-to-use cut-offs can distinguish between substantially different risk profiles.Lay summaryAlcohol is the leading cause of death and illness due to liver disease. In this study, we assessed the ability of biomarkers to predict the risk of developing symptomatic liver disease in patients with early stages of alcohol-related liver disease. We found that several tests accurately predicted the risk of liver-related events such as ascites, esophageal varices and hepatic encephalopathy during an average follow-up of 4.1 years. Liver stiffness measurements by ultrasound elastography and the enhanced liver fibrosis test performed best. By using them, we were able to stratify patients into 3 groups with significantly different risks. Alcohol is the most common cause of liver-related mortality and morbidity. We therefore aimed to assess and compare the prognostic performance of elastography and blood-based markers to predict time to the first liver-related event, severe infection, and all-cause mortality in patients with a history of excess drinking. We performed a prospective cohort study in patients with early, compensated alcohol-related liver disease. At baseline, we obtained a liver biopsy, transient elastography (TE), 2-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE), enhanced liver fibrosis test (ELF), FibroTest, fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), non-alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis score (NFS) and Forns index. We compared C-statistics and time-dependent AUC for prognostication. We used validated cut-off points to create 3 risk groups for each test: low, intermediate and high risk. We followed 462 patients for a median of 49 months (IQR 31–70). Median age was 57 years, 76% were males, 20% had advanced fibrosis. Eighty-four patients (18%) developed a liver-related event after a median of 18 months (7-34). TE had the highest prognostic accuracy, with a C-statistic of 0.876, and time-dependent AUC at 5 years of 0.889, comparable to 2D-SWE and ELF. TE, ELF and 2D-SWE outperformed FibroTest, FIB4, NFS, Forns index and biopsy-verified fibrosis stage. Compared to patients with TE <10 kPa, the hazard ratios for liver-related events for TE 10–15 kPa were 8.1 (3.2–20.4), and 27.9 (13.8–56.8) for TE >15 kPa. Periods of excessive drinking during follow-up increased the risk of progressing to liver-related events, except for patients in the low-risk groups. TE, ELF and 2D-SWE are highly accurate prognostic markers in patients with alcohol-related liver disease. Easy-to-use cut-offs can distinguish between substantially different risk profiles.