AB0877-HPR EXERCISE COMPLIANCE AND DISEASE STATUS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Authors: G. G. Pala, Z. Tuna, N. G. Tore, S. Bayram, F. Sarİ, M. A. Ozturk, D. Oskay
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2021)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic affects the whole world in many ways. In an effort to slow down the infection, physical distancing and isolation policies have been implemented in Turkey, likewise the rest of the world. Thereby, rheumatic diseases require to obey the self-isolation recommendations strictly due to general vulnerability to infections in those patients. Due to the precautions taken for isolation, the physical inactivity level of the patients which would affect the disease activity has increased (1). Objectives: The primary purpose of this study was to assess the exercise compliance and clinical status of the patients with rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary aim of the study was to evaluate the physical activity level and quality of life of the patients during the pandemic. Methods: The research is a cross-sectional study. Seventy-nine patients with various rheumatic diseases were included in the study. Standard questions were used to evaluate the exercise habits, the level of pain and morning stiffness and severity of exacerbations. Pain and morning stiffness levels and attack severity were scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) (0-10; with 0 indicating no pain/stiffness and 10 severe pain/stiffness). Attack duration was recorded in number of exacerbated days. Parameters were compared before and after the pandemic with Paired Samples T Test. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) Questionnaire were filled to assess the physical activity level and quality of life. Results: Twenty-eight percent of the patients were diagnosed with Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), 37% were Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), 14% were Systemic Sclerosis (ScS) 14% were Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), 6% were Rheumatoid Arthritis, 1% were Primary Sjogren Syndrome (PSS). Less than half of the patients (46%) did continue exercising regularly during the pandemic and 30 (81%) of them performed only the exercises given by the therapist while 7 (9%) of them tried different exercise types from another source. The reason for discontinuation to exercising expressed by the incompliant patients were mostly “unwillingness” (17 of 37 patients). Pain, morning stiffness and number of attacks were better during the pandemic compared to before however, a statistically significant difference was found only for morning stiffness ( p = .036). The results of IPAQ showed that the majority of the patients (n: 48) were physically inactive, while only 2 patients were active during the pandemic. The most deteriorated quality of life subcategory was energy level of the patients according to the NHP scores. Conclusion: This study results showed that patients with rheumatic diseases stayed physically inactive during the pandemic and the disease status has also been affected negatively. As the duration of the pandemic prolongs, levels of physical inactivity would increase and the progressive physical inactivity is expected to worsen patients’ symptoms more. However, as the pandemic appears to continue, face-to-face exercise therapy should still be avoided. For all those reasons above, alternative ways of therapy like tele-rehabilitation would come onto stage to cope with the increasing physical inactivity of the rheumatic patients. References: [1]Pinto AJ, Dunstan DW, Owen N, Bonfá E, Gualano B. Combating physical inactivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2020; 16(7):1-2. Disclosure of Interests: None declared