FRI0229 THE IMPACT OF SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS ON BODY IMAGE PATIENTS
Authors: L. Brites, F. Costa, L. Saraiva, A. R. Cunha, J. A. P. Da Silva, T. Santiago, M. J. Salvador
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2020)

Background: Satisfaction with body image has a major impact in quality of life. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a can result in disfiguring physical changes. Objectives: Our aim was to determine the impact of systemic sclerosis on body image using the Satisfaction with Appearance Scale (SWAP). (1) Methods: Cross-sectional study including patients satisfying the 2013 American College of Rheumatology criteria for SSc diagnosis, aged ≥ 18 years, treated in a tertiary Rheumatology Department. Demographic and clinical data were collected from Reuma.pt and clinical records. All patients provided informed consent and fulfilled SWAP questionnaire, which consists of 14 questions in 4 subscales: satisfaction with facial appearance, satisfaction with non-facial appearance, social discomfort due to appearance and perceived social impact of appearance. Patients rate each item on a numerical rating scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Scores for the facial and non-facial appearance range from 0-24 and scores for the social discomfort and perceived social impact subscales range from 0-18. Total SWAP score can range from 0-84 and higher values indicate greater dissatisfaction with appearance and poorer body image. A descriptive analysis was used to summarize demographic and clinical data; categorical variables were described using frequencies; and continuous data using mean and standard deviation. Correlation between variables [Rodnan, age, disease duration, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Short Form Health Survey (SF36)] and SWAP score was tested with Pearson or Spearman coefficient, as appropriated. Scores of SWAP and its subscales in preclinical, limited and diffuse forms of SSc were compared using ANOVA test. Analyses were performed with SPSS Statistics, V.21 and p &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: We enrolled 38 patients, 84.2% (n=32) female, with mean age 60.3±14.5 years and mean disease duration 13.3±6.5 years. All but one were caucasian. Fifty percent (n=19) had a limited form, 26.3% (n=10) had preclinical scleroderma and 23.7% (n=9) had a diffuse form of SSc. Regarding the autoantibody profile: 63.2% (n=24) had anti-centromere antibodies, 28.9% (n=11) had anti-Scl-70 antibodies, 5.3% (n=2) had anti-PM antibodies and 2.6% (n=1) had no positive antibodies. The median of Rodnan scores was 4 (IQR 0-9). The total mean SWAP score was 44.8±12.5 with worse results at “Satisfaction with facial appearance” subscale (mean score 14.4±6.1). There is no statistically significant difference in the SWAP score (or its subscales) between the three diagnosis subtypes. No statistically significant correlation was found between the total and subscale SWAP scores and any of the continuous variables considered and no statistically significant difference was found between the different forms of SSc. Conclusion: We found no significant differences between preclinical, limited or diffused SS. SWAP scores were not significantly correlated with the total Rodnan score, age or disease duration. Contrary to our expectations SWAP did not show any relationship with depression, anxiety (HADS) or quality of Life (SF-36) However, our sample is too small to support definite conclusions. Further studies assessing body image in SSc and its impact in quality of life are warranted to support the holistic care of these patients. References: [1]doi:10.3899/jrheum.141482.; [2]10.1037/0278-6133.22.2.130; [3]10.3899/jrheum.141482. Disclosure of Interests: Luisa Brites: None declared, Flavio Costa: None declared, LILIANA SARAIVA: None declared, Ana Rita Cunha: None declared, José Antonio P. da Silva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, Consultant of: Pfizer, AbbVie, Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Tânia Santiago: None declared, Maria Joao Salvador: None declared