OP0118 DECIPHERING THE ANTI-PROTEIN-ARGININE DEIMINASE (PAD) RESPONSE IDENTIFIES PAD1 AND PAD6 AS NOVEL AUTOANTIGENS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
Authors: L. Martinez-Prat, M. A. Aure, C. Bentow, D. Lucia, M. Lopez-Hoyos, M. Mahler
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2020)

Background: Protein-arginine deiminase (PAD) 4 enzymes play a central role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and represents an antigenic target. Among the five known family members (PAD1, PAD2, PAD3, PAD4 and PAD6), only PAD2, PAD3 and PAD4 have been described to have autoantigenic properties. Furtheremore, very little is known on the the isotype usage of these autoantibodies. Understanding the molecular basis of the anti-PAD antibody reponse has the potential to open novel approaches for precision medicine in RA. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to screen for the presence of antibodies to the five PAD family members and to evaluate the isotype usage of the anti-PAD4 response in RA. Methods: First, we developed a panel for the detection of anti-PAD IgG based on a particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT), that utilized paramagnetic particles coupled with the different human recombinant PAD proteins (PAD1, PAD2, PAD3, PAD4 and PAD6) and anti-human IgG conjugate. This panel was used to test sera from RA patients (n=33) and non-RA controls (n=36). The controls were comprised of apparently healthy individuals (n=10), and patients with infectious diseases (n=10), systemic lupus erythematosus (n=7), systemic sclerosis (n=9) and Sjogren’s syndrome (n=1). Next, the PAD4-coupled beads were tested with anti-human IgM, IgA and IgG conjugates on an extended cohort of RA patients (n=62) and the same non-RA controls. Results: All five anti-PAD IgG (Figure 1) demonstrated the ability to discriminate between RA patients and controls. At greater than 90% specificity, anti-PAD4 IgG, followed by anti-PAD3 IgG, showed the best diagnostic performance. Significantly higher levels of the five antibodies were observed in RA vs. controls ( p -values of 0.0041, &lt;0.0001, 0.0014, 0.0039, and 0.0140 for anti-PAD1, 2, 3, 4 and 6, respectively). Significant correlation was observed between all the antibodies, with the highest between anti-PAD1 and anti-PAD4 (Spearman´s rho =0.87, p &lt;0.0001) and the lowest between anti-PAD4 and anti-PAD2 (Spearman’s rho =0.38, p =0.0015) and anti-PAD4 and anti-PAD6 (Spearman’s rho =0.38, p =0.0011). While principal component analysis (PCA) (Figure 2) showed an association between all anti-PAD antibodies, there was further discrimination that displayed closer association between anti-PAD1, 3 and 4 on one hand, and between anti-PAD2 and 6. For the extended testing of anti-PAD4 with IgG, IgA and IgM, all three isotypes were identified in the sera of RA patients. Higher levels of the three isotypes were observed in RA patients with erosive disease when compared with the patients without erosion, but this association was only significant for anti-PAD4 IgA ( p =0.0086). Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis of the discrimination between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and controls of IgG to protein-arginine deiminase (PAD) 1, PAD2, PAD3, PAD4 and PAD6. The area under the curve (AUC) values are shown in brackets for each biomarker. Abbreviations: TPF: true positive fraction; FPF: false positive fraction Figure 2. Two dimensional principal component analysis (PCA) plot of the anti-PAD levels in RA patients (n=33) and controls (n=36). Anti-PAD1, 3 and 4 have the main contribution to PC1, which explains 51.7% of the variance, and anti-PAD2 and 6 to PC2, that represents 20.8% of it. Abbreviations: PC: principal component Conclusion: Our study is the first to describe PAD1 and PAD6 as novel antigenic targets in RA and to demostrate that the anti-PAD4 B-cell immune response uses all three isotypes (IgG, IgA and IgM). The strong and significant association between anti-PAD4 IgA and joint erosion is of particular clinical relevance. Disclosure of Interests: Laura Martinez-Prat Employee of: I am an employee of Inova Diagnostics, an in vitro diagnostics company., Mary Ann Aure Employee of: I am an employee of Inova Diagnostics, an in vitro diagnostics company., Chelsea Bentow Employee of: I am an employee of Inova Diagnostics, an in vitro diagnostics company., David Lucia Employee of: I am an employee of Inova Diagnostics, an in vitro diagnostics company., Marcos Lopez-Hoyos Consultant of: Inova Diagnostics, an in vitro diagnostics company., Michael Mahler Employee of: I am an employee of Inova Diagnostics, an in vitro diagnostics company.