tbuckley/cabot-search huggingface dataset:
Randomized trial of standard chemotherapy alone or combined with atezolizumab as adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III colon cancer and deficient mismatch repair (ATOMIC, Alliance A021502).
Authors: Frank A. Sinicrope, Fang-Shu Ou, Tyler Zemla, Andrew B. Nixon, Kabir Mody, Alexandra Levasseur, Amylou C. Dueck, Asha R. Dhanarajan, Christopher Hanyoung Lieu, Deirdre Jill Cohen, Federico Innocenti, Robert J. Behrens, Walter Peters, Nicolas Sommer, Eileen Mary O'Reilly, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019)

e15169 Background: In metastatic colorectal cancer with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR), anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy produced high tumor response rates and extended progression-free survival compared to lack of benefit for cancers with proficient MMR. In an ongoing phase III randomized trial, we will determine if the addition of the anti-PD-L1 antibody, atezolizumab (Genentech), to adjuvant FOLFOX can improve patient disease-free survival (DFS) vs FOLFOX alone in patients with stage III colon cancers with dMMR. By blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction, atezolizumab may activate T cells, thereby, restoring their ability to detect and attack tumor cells. Limited data suggest that FOLFOX may increase intratumoral cytotoxic CD8+ T cells that could serve as ‘immune priming'. Methods: Patients with curatively resected stage III colon carcinomas with evidence of dMMR are randomized to modified FOLFOX6 for 6 months (12 cycles) alone (control arm) or combined with atezolizumab (840 mg IV q2 wk) with continuation of the antibody as monotherapy for an additional 6 months (total duration of 12 months) [experimental arm]. Patients will be stratified by T, N stage and tumor sidedness. Local testing for MMR proteins is allowed. Atezolizumab must begin by/with cycle 2. One cycle of FOLFOX is allowed pre-registration. The targeted accrual goal of 700 patients and 165 disease-free survival (DFS) events will provide 90% power to detect an effect size expressed as hazard ratio of 0.6 for the primary endpoint of DFS at two-sided alpha of 0.05. Interim analyses are planned at 50% and 75% of events. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, treatment tolerability, and quality of life. Results: This study is being conducted by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, was approved by NCI CTEP and activated in 09/2017. The study is actively accruing and, as of 02/11/2019, 152 patients are enrolled. We are actively exploring an international collaboration. Conclusions: This is a current clinical trial in progress. Clinical trial information: NCT02912559.
Detection of circulating tumor DNA in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Authors: Lucia Nappi, Jack Bacon, Matti Annala, Maryam Soleimani, Jean-Michel Lavoie, Kim N. Chi, Alexander William Wyatt, Christian K. Kollmannsberger
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019)

e16105 Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) represents the most common presentation of kidney cancer. Patient outcomes have significantly improved with the approval of several targeted agents over the past decade. However, the lack of predictive biomarkers has hampered treatment optimization. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as an effective, minimally-invasive alternative to tissue for profiling the tumor genome in other tumors. Methods: Blood samples were collected from patients (pts) with metastatic ccRCC for next-generation sequencing of cell free DNA and germline DNA. Targeted sequencing was performed using the Roche Human Oncology Design panel of 981 genes to a median depth of 937x unique reads. Matched FFPE tissue was available from 14 pts and profiled using the same assay. Results: Samples from 52 metastatic, treatment-naïve pts were analyzed. Germline mutations were detected in 6/52 (11%) of the pts with the most frequent abnormalities affecting ATM, PALB2, RAD51D, CHEK2, BRCA1. Median ctDNA fraction was 3.9% (2-40%) with a median of 2 mutations/pt. Somatic mutations were detected in 29/52 (56%) of the samples; of those, 15/29 (51%) of pts harbored RCC-related genes mutations, 3/29 (10%) non-coding mutations and 10/29 (34%) alterations in non RCC-associated genes. Median variant allele frequency was 1.9% (1-22%). Consistent with tissue-based reports, VHL, BAP1, PBRM1, and TP53 were the most frequently altered genes. Lastly, 50% of the patient-matched FFPE tissue samples shared a fully concordant mutation profile. Conclusions: We confirmed a high prevalence of germline mutations in pts with ccRCC. The rate of ctDNA detection in metastatic ccRCC appears to be lower than in other metastatic solid tumors. Furthermore, it is not yet clear whether all the detected somatic alterations are strictly ccRCC-ctDNA dependent. Nevertheless, a quarter of pts exhibited clinically-informative ccRCC associated alterations in their liquid biopsy. These findings suggest that ctDNA is a promising tool for genomic profiling in a subset of patients with metastatic ccRCC.
A randomized phase II study of palbociclib plus exemestane with GNRH agonist versus capecitabine in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (KCSG-BR 15-10, NCT02592746).
Authors: Yeon Hee Park, Tae Yong Kim, Gun Min Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Seok Yun Kang, In Hae Park, Jee Hyun Kim, Kyoung Eun Lee, Hee Kyung Ahn, Moon Hee Lee, Hee Jun Kim, Han Jo Kim, Jong In Lee, Su-Jin Koh, Ji-Yeon Kim, Kyung-Hun Lee, Joohyuk Sohn, Sung-Bae Kim, Young-Hyuck Im, Seock-Ah Im
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019)

1007 Background: Endocrine treatment is preferred recommendation by clinical guidelines in premenopausal as well as postmenopausal women with hormone receptor(HR)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer(MBC). In real-world clinical practice, however, substantial numbers of patients are treated with chemotherapy in earlier lines based on endocrine resistance and/or on physician’s concern of worse prognosis associated with aggressive tumor behavior and younger age. In terms of the chemotherapy regimens, capecitabine seems one of the most popular options. The purpose of this phase II study is to assess the safety and the clinical anti-tumor activity of exemestane plus GNRH agonist in combination with palbociclib versus capecitabine in premenopausal HR-positive MBC patients. Methods: This is a prospective, two-arm, randomized, multi-center open-label phase II study of the Korean Cancer Study Group. Patients were allowed with previous 1 line of chemotherapy for MBC. De Novo metastatic patients should have been treated with tamoxifen before enrollment. Patients were randomized to chemotherapy (capecitabine 1250 ㎎/㎡twice a day from day 1 to 14 every 3 weeks) or endocrine therapy combination (exemestane 25 mg for 28 days and palbociclib 125 mg for 21 days every 4 weeks with GNRH agoinst). Primary endpoint was Progression-Free Survival (PFS). Results: Among 189 patients enrolled between 2016 and 2018 from 14 centers, 184 patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy (n = 92) or endocrine therapy with palbociclib (n = 92). Median age was 44 (range 28-58). De Novo MBC was found equally in both arm (30%). During median 14 months of follow-up, median PFS was superior in endocrine with palbociclib than in capecitabine arm [19.0 vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.0493 by log-rank test; Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.643 (0.415-0.999), p = 0.0493]. Approximately half of the patients (51%) were treatment naïve in the advanced setting (49% for palbociclib vs. 51% for capecitabine). Grade III or more hematologic toxicities were more common in palbociclib than in capecitabine with statistical significance (60.9% vs. 19.2%, p &lt; 0.0001). Diarrhea (11% vs. 38%) and Hand-Foot syndromes (1% vs. 76%) were more common in capecitabine arm. Conclusions: Exemestane plus palbociclib with ovarian suppression showed clinical benefit in terms of PFS compared with capecitabine in patients with premenopausal ER-positive MBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02592746.
A relationship-based approach to improving the clinical trial experience.
Authors: Sarah MacKay Helou, Camber W. Gadberry, Nicholas Zahara, Claire Nickols, Tanya Vidhyarkorn, Daniel Otap, Janice Russell, Jessica Piggee, Catherine Scher, Myriam Estrabaut, Sarah Churchill, San Tran
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019)

e14055 Background: The rapidly evolving field of Cancer Immunotherapy (CIT) has mobilized biopharma to develop promising new treatments while at the same time created a need to expedite the pathway of those new therapies from bench to bedside. This race to bring innovative treatments to patients has engendered heightened levels of competition for the attention of and partnership with the best research institutions in the biopharma industry. Methods: Recognizing this reality, Roche created the immunotherapy Centers of Research Excellence (imCORE) Network: a network of leading cancer immunotherapy centers worldwide. The vision of this network was to partner with sites to streamline the operational delivery of the Roche Genentech portfolio while deepening the collective understanding of the science to prioritize and accelerate the most promising new treatment options for our patients. Creation of a network was not a novel idea, but Roche set out to build a network unique to the biopharma industry – one which was relationship-based where the site/sponsor relationship serves as the foundation for driving both collaborative scientific investigations and operational efficiencies in support of Roche’s clinical trials. While the identification and optimization of promising candidate drugs in the preclinical and translational settings are critical first steps in the drug development process, the initiation and operationalization of early phase clinical trials are equally important in the multidimensional cycle of drug development. Results: See Conclusions. Conclusions: This white paper will provide an overview of imCORE’s origins with a focus on the strategic importance of the site-sponsor relationship and the mutual value that is derived from the combined benefits of these relationships and in conducting early clinical trials more efficiently across Roche’s CIT portfolio. Further examination of communication and operational improvement to support the network will be highlighted as key drivers in creating and sustaining meaningful site/sponsor relationships that better facilitate the operationalization of clinical trials and ultimately brings novel therapies to patients in a more efficient manner than in the past.
Association of SOX9 expression with sensitivity to CDK7 inhibition and overall survival in triple-negative breast cancer.
Authors: Xiaoxiang Guan, Juan Jin, Lin Tang, Xin Wang, Yucai Wang, Yongqian Shu
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019)

1065 Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been shown to display cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7)-dependent transcriptional addition and is sensitive to a CDK7 inhibitor THZ1. As tumor heterogeneity is well known, we sought to identify predictive markers of sensitivity to CDK7 inhibition in TNBC. Methods: Published mRNA microarray data was analyzed to identify genes associated with sensitivity of TNBC cells to the CDK7 inhibitor THZ1. Cell survival assay after THZ1 treatment was performed using Cell Counting Kit-8. Expression of SOX9 was examined by Western blot in cell lines and IHC in breast cancer tissue microarray. Patient survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Analysis of published mRNA microarray data showed that SOX9 was overexpressed in the MDA-468 and BT-549 TNBC cell lines, which were sensitive to the CDK7 inhibitor THZ1 and showed decreased SOX9 expression with THZ1 treatment. We treated 10 TNBC cell lines with various concentrations of THZ1 and found that these cell lines displayed a wide spectrum of sensitivity to THZ1, with an IC50 ranging from 20-30 nM in sensitive lines (MDA-468 and MDA-231) to ~300 nM in insensitive lines (BT-20 and MDA-157). There was a strong correlation of SOX9 expression by Western blot and sensitivity to THZ1 in these cell lines (Pearson correlation, r = 0.82, P= 0.01). IHC of two tissue microarrays containing 278 breast cancer samples showed that SOX9 expression was significantly higher in TNBC (n = 59) compared to hormone positive breast cancer (n = 173; P&lt; 0.01). Among the 59 TNBC cases, 43 had high SOX9 expression and 16 had low SOX9 expression. Patients with high or low SOX expression had similar grade, T stage and nodal involvement (All P&gt; 0.20). Finally, with standard of care treatment, TNBC patients with high SOX9 expression had a significantly worse overall survival (OS) compared to patients with low SOX9 expression (2 year OS rate 100% vs 92.9%, 5 year OS rate 93.8% vs 83.3%, log rank P= 0.03). Conclusions: SOX9 expression level in TNBC cell lines was associated with sensitivity to the CDK7 inhibitor THZ1. TNBC patients with high expression of SOX9 had worse OS, and may benefit from CDK7 inhibition as a novel therapy.
Interim analysis of a phase II study of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in patients with pediatric solid tumors in adulthood (GETHI021).
Authors: Xabier Mielgo, Robert Diaz-Beveridge, Juan Manuel Sepulveda, Estela Pineda, Maria Jose Lecumberri, Ramon De Las Penas, Nuria Rodriguez Salas, Claudia Valverde, Rafael López Castro, Maria Angeles Vaz, Carlos Lopez Lopez, Juan Antonio Virizuela, Javier Medina, Rafael Lopez, Cristina Rodríguez-Antona, Pedro Berraondo, Juan Francisco Rodriguez-Moreno, Diana Moreno, Raquel Martin Hernandez, Jesus Garcia-Donas
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019)

2613 Background: Solid pediatric tumors that appear in adulthood are a heterogeneous group characterized by a low incidence, lack of standard therapeutic options and reduced survival. We have designed the first phase II clinical trial of nivolumab and ipilimumab in this setting, Here, we present the results of the first cohort with 30 evaluable patients. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, single arm Phase II study conducted in 15 centers of the Spanish Group for Rare Cancer (GETHI). We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in adult patients ( 18 years) with locally advanced or metastatic childhood malignancies that have progressed or are not candidates to standard therapy. Treatment consisted on nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV q2w + ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV q6w for 6 months or until progression/unacceptable toxicity, for a maximum of 24 months. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. We used a Simon optimal two-stage design, with a first stage including first 30 evaluable patients. Results: 20 patients were male and median age was 43 (range 20-75). Most frequent histologies were medulloblastoma (4) neuroblastoma (4) and Ewing family tumors (3). 90% had received prior systemic therapy with 37% presenting progressive disease as best response. Median previous treatment lines were 3 (range 1-9). 27 patients were PS0-1, and 3 PS2. 6 patients have been treated for ≥6 months . Only one discontinued for adverse events. With a median follow up of 4,3 months (range 0,4-11,3), 1 patient has achieved a deep partial response (PR) (3,6%), 10 stable disease (SD) (35,7%) and 17 progressive disease (PD) (60,7%). 2 patients died before radiologic evaluation. Clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) was 39,3%. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 1,8 months (95% CI 1,3-2,3), with a 3-months-PFS of 32,7% and 6-months-PFS of 20%. Median overall survival (OS) was 6,8 months (95% CI 3,3-10,2). 12 (40%) patients presented adverse events (AE) of any grade and 6 (20%) experienced a grade AE deemed as possibly related to treatment. Conclusions: The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab showed significant clinical benefit in this population with little therapeutic options. One case of metastatic esthesioneuroblastoma, achieved a dramatic tumor response and represents the first patient with this extremely rare histology treated with immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: EudraCT 2016-003946-99.
An innovative combined immunization platform for personalized cancer immunotherapy.
Authors: Jessica Matta, Célia Matta, Emilie Thiebault Peter, David Moulaert, Robert Drillien, Benoit Petit-Demouliere, Tania Sorg, Ghina Bou about, Jean-Marc Limacher
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019)

e14225 Background: Activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors relies mainly on the presence of an immune response directed against neoantigens resulting from tumor specific mutations. The induction and/or amplification of such an immune response is expected to increase the activity of these therapies. We describe here a novel immunization platform developed for the purpose of personalized cancer immunotherapy. This platform integrates a DNA vector coding for neoantigens, a live modified vaccinia of strain Ankara (MVA) used as a physiologic adjuvant and anti-CTLA-4 as a locally acting early immune checkpoint blocker. Methods: Immune potency was assessed in C57BL6 mice injected subcutaneously three times five days apart with an ovalbumine (OVA) expressing DNA vector (100 µg), either alone or in combination with increasing doses of MVA (up to 2.5x10 7 plaque forming units, pfu) and increasing doses of anti-CTLA-4 (up to 100 µg). OVA specific immune responses were measured by ELISpot. Anti-tumor efficacy was then investigated with a similar administration scheme in a therapeutic B16F10 mice melanoma model with a DNA vector coding for the B16F10-M30 tumor neoantigen. Results: At an optimal dose of 2.5x10 6 pfu, MVA significantly improved OVA specific immune response up to 10 times higher as compared to vector alone. Addition of CTLA-4 blockade further increased the magnitude of response, up to 30 times higher than with vector alone. Both MVA and CTLA-4 demonstrated a bell-shaped dose dependent effect. In tumor-bearing animals, 80% experienced durable tumor-free survival when treated with the combination therapy as compared to less than 20% in untreated animals or animals treated with each component independently. Treatment appeared feasible and well-tolerated. Conclusions: Neoantigen coding DNA vector, MVA and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint blockade, when co-administered in immunocompetent C57BL6 mice, acted synergistically to induce a cellular immune response. The same approach translated into a strong anti-tumoral response in an aggressive melanoma model. This combined immunization platform appears as a potential novel way to enhance clinical benefit from current immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Phase I trial of the combination of the heat shock protein-90 inhibitor onalespib (AT13387) and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor AT7519M in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Authors: Khanh Tu Do, John L. Hays, Stephen V. Liu, Alice P. Chen, Geraldine O'Sullivan, Jeffrey G. Supko, Kristin Beebe, Len Neckers, Jane B. Trepel, Min-Jung Lee, Courtney Gannon, Alona Muzikansky, Susana M. Campos, Elizabeth Downey, Andrew Wolanski, Jennifer Hedglin, Fernanda Irene Arnaldez, James H. Doroshow, Geoffrey Shapiro
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019)

2619 Background: The 90kDa heat shock protein (HSP90) participates in the folding, stabilization, activation, and proteolytic turnover of aberrant proteins that contribute to the growth and survival of cancer cells. HSP90 inhibition leads to degradation of these aberrant proteins through the ubiquitin-proteosome pathway, allowing for simultaneous targeting of multiple pathways. Inhibition of HSP90 alone stimulates a compensatory upregulation of HSP70. The transcriptional induction of HSP70 has been linked to the activity of CDK9. Combined inhibition of onalespib-mediated HSP90 inhibition and AT7519-mediated CDK9 inhibition has demonstrated synergistic anti-tumor activity in preclinical models at NOAEL doses, justifying a Phase 1 study. Methods: We conducted an open-label phase 1 study following a 3+3 trial design. Patients received a 1-week lead-in of onalespib alone (C0), followed by onalespib/AT7519M on days 1,4,8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle. Pharmacokinetic samples were obtained on C0D1 after onalespib alone, and on C1D1 and D11 with the combination. HSP70 protein levels were analyzed in PBMC and plasma samples collected at baseline, after onalespib alone, and after the combination, in order to demonstrate AT7519-mediated suppression of HSP70 expression. Patients enrolled to the expansion phase underwent optional paired tumor biopsies for assessment of proof-of-mechanism demonstration of modulation of client proteins. Results: Twenty-eight patients have been treated, 10 of whom were enrolled to the expansion cohort with optional tumor biopsies. The MTD is DL2: onalespib 80 mg/m 2 IV + AT7519M 21 mg/m 2 IV on days 1,4,8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle. At DL3, DLTs included Grade 3 troponin elevation and mucositis. Drug-related adverse events occurring in ≥ 30% of patients include diarrhea, fatigue, mucositis, nausea, and vomiting, consistent with known toxicities of these agents. Two patients with colorectal and endometrial cancer, respectively, remained on study for 10 cycles with SD as the best response. Modulation of HSP70 were demonstrated in patient plasma samples. Conclusions: The combination of onalespib and AT7519 is tolerable, although the doses of both agents were below the monotherapy MTDs. Prolonged disease stabilizations were observed. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses are ongoing, including assessment of HSP70 expression in plasma and tumor. Clinical trial information: NCT02503709.
Safety and efficacy of nimotuzumab and concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical squamous cell cancer.
Authors: Ang Qu, Junjie Wang, Ping Jiang, Panfeng Wang, Muyi Zhang, Xu Li, Haitao Sun
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019)

5532 Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of nimotuzumab plus concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and chemotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced cervical squamous cell cancer (LACSCC). Methods: From December 2013 to March 2017, 31 patients with stage (FIGO 2009) IB2-IVA cervical squamous cell cancer were enrolled in this single-arm clinical trial at an academic medical center and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus nimotuzumab. All patients underwent at least 1 year of follow-up. The prescription radiation dose was 50.4 Gy/28 F on the pelvic field with or without extended-field radiation. An additional 30-36 Gy to Point A was delivered with high-dose-rate techniques. Cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 and nimotuzumab 200 mg were infused intravenously once weekly during radiotherapy. The main and secondary outcome measures were toxicity evaluated using CTCAE 4.0., and the short-term outcome evaluated by RECIST 1.1. Results: The median follow-up duration was 29.7 months (13.3-61.2 months). All patients received external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, and nimotuzumab six times. Twenty-seven patients received six cycles of chemotherapy while four received only 4-5 cycles. There was no life-threatening toxicity. The incidence of acute grade 3 bone marrow depression was 51.6% (16/31) and grade 3 gastrointestinal tract reaction was 9.7% (3/31). The incidence of late toxicities was 22.6% (7/31), and these included vaginal-rectal fistula, intestinal obstruction, rectal hemorrhage, hematuria, and vaginal stenosis. Complete response was achieved in 30 cases (96.8%). The 1-year disease-free survival (DFS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 87.1%, 90.3%, and 100%, respectively. The corresponding 3-year values were 74.8%, 90.3%, and 86.7%. Conclusions: Nimotuzumab plus concurrent IMRT and chemotherapy may represent a well-tolerated and effective treatment regimen in patients with LACSCC.