Impacts of COVID-19 on vulnerable children in temporary accommodation in the UK
Authors: Diana Margot Rosenthal, Marcella Ucci, Michelle Heys, Andrew Hayward, Monica Lakhanpaul
Journal: The Lancet Public Health (2020)

There is no doubt that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has huge economic implications as highlighted by the media, but there are also a myriad of considerable direct and indirect health, social, and educational consequences for children and families experiencing homelessness, while living in temporary or insecure accommodation (eg, staying with friends or family, sofa surfing, shelters, bed and breakfast lodging). In particular, young children (aged ≤5 years) living in temporary accommodation have an invisible plight that might not seem obvious to many people because they are not on the streets as homeless (eg, rough sleepers), but are perhaps the most susceptible to viral infection because of pre-existing conditions (eg, diabetes, asthma, epilepsy, anxiety, depression).1Story A Slopes and cliffs in health inequalities: comparative morbidity of housed and homeless people.Lancet. 2013; 382: S93Summary Full Text Full Text PDF Google Scholar Additionally, these children rarely have the ability to self-isolate and adhere to social distancing, with previous extreme inequalities and inequities in accessing health care becoming exacerbated. In 2019, the charity Shelter reported that a child loses their home every 8 min in Great Britain, which is the equivalent of 183 children per day.2Reynolds L Dzalto A Generation homeless: the numbers behind the story.https://england.shelter.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/1876518/Generation_homeless.pdfDate: Dec 3, 2019Date accessed: January 15, 2020Google Scholar The total number of children who were homeless and in temporary accommodation increased to 126 020 in England in 2019, of whom 88 080 were in London.2Reynolds L Dzalto A Generation homeless: the numbers behind the story.https://england.shelter.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/1876518/Generation_homeless.pdfDate: Dec 3, 2019Date accessed: January 15, 2020Google Scholar The Children's Commissioner suggested that there could be more than 210 000 homeless children in temporary accommodation or sofa surfing and approximately 585 000 who are either homeless or at risk of becoming homeless in England.3Children's CommissionerBleak houses: tackling the crisis of family homelessness in England.https://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/cco-bleak-houses-report-august-2019.pdfDate: Aug 21, 2019Date accessed: March 30, 2020Google Scholar How do these children cope during this pandemic? Homeless children aged 5 years and younger are not only at high risk of exposure and transmission due to overcrowding in substandard housing, but also of immediate and long-term effects on growth, optimal health, and brain development. According to UNICEF, "The first 1000 days can shape a child's future. We have one chance to get it right",4UNICEFEarly moments matter.https://www.unicef.org/early-momentsDate accessed: March 18, 2020Google Scholar which also extends to the first 5 years. Many children already do not reach development potential or struggle to grow and develop because of multilevel barriers, including those resulting from poverty or homelessness. However, COVID-19 has added a whole new layer of risk. First, many families have to live in a single bedroom with shared kitchen and toilet facilities, causing overcrowding and making self-isolation impossible in confined spaces.5Garvie D Self-isolation? Try it as a homeless family living in one room.https://blog.shelter.org.uk/2020/03/self-isolation-try-it-as-a-homeless-family-living-in-one-room/Date: March 20, 2020Date accessed: March 20, 2020Google Scholar Often, children have inadequate space to crawl or play and no access to fresh air. Second, no regulation on temporary accommodation exists regarding what is deemed suitable or how long someone can stay in temporary housing. With COVID-19, these children will stay in temporary accommodation for extended periods because no applications or services are being processed or provided. Third, handwashing and hygiene are reduced because of minimal access to soap, water, disinfectants, and bathrooms. Another issue is that no face-to-face contact with general practitioners and health outreach services is available, including health visitors, which limits routine checks such as early identification of need and risk, health and development reviews with screening assessments, immunisations, promotion of social and emotional development, support for parenting, promotion of health and behavioural change, prevention of obesity, and promotion of breastfeeding.6Department of HealthHealthy child programme: pregnancy and the first five years of life.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/healthy-child-programme-pregnancy-and-the-first-5-years-of-lifeDate: October 2009Date accessed: February 19, 2020Google Scholar Furthermore, for these families, access to basic essentials (eg, food, nappies) is scarce, with no resources to shop online and many charities and dropins now closed. Additionally, they do not have regular support services (eg, legal advice, weekly allowances, housing or immigration, online access to resources from the National Health Service via WiFi). A further consideration is that risks to parental mental health are increased, especially among single mothers, given that housing instability is associated with an increased risk of depression in mothers.7Marcal K Timing of housing crises: impacts on maternal depression.Soc Work Ment Health. 2018; 16: 266-283Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar Finally, existing vulnerabilities and risk factors for safeguarding are exacerbated by additional factors introduced by the pandemic. Because the duration of the outbreak is unclear and these children are more vulnerable to both primary and secondary effects, it is absolutely vital that they are not further marginalised. The UK Government needs to take necessary steps and work collaboratively with all sectors, health services, and the housing sector (eg, possibly use hotels with space availability due to no incoming tourists) to reduce overcrowding and transmission of COVID-19 to protect some of the most vulnerable in our society. We declare no competing interests. COVID-19 puts societies to the testAs of April 21, the coronavirus outbreak has infected more than 2·3 million people and taken 162 956 lives—35 884 in the USA, 24 114 in Italy, 20 852 in Spain, 20 233 in France, 16 509 in the UK, 5209 in Iran, 4642 in China—all underestimates most probably. Beyond these numbers are people, families, communities, societies that have been affected in unprecedented ways. The coronavirus pandemic puts societies to the test: it is a test of political leadership, of national health systems, of social care services, of solidarity, of the social contract—a test of our very own fabric. Full-Text PDF Open Access