Abstract GS2-02: Acquired activating mutations in RTKs confer endocrine resistance in ER+ metastatic breast cancer through ER-reprogramming, MAPK signaling, and an induced stem-like cell state
Authors: Ofir Cohen, Pingping Mao, Utthara Nayar, Jorge E Buendia-Bue, Dewey Kim, Esha Jain, Karla Helvie, Daniel Abravanel, Kailey J Kowalski, Christian Kapstad, Samuel Freeman, Victor Adalsteinsson, Seth A Wander, Adrienne G Waks, Gad Getz, Aviv Regev, Eric Winer P Winer, Nancy U Nancy U. Lin, Nikhil Wagle
Journal: Cancer Research (2020)

Abstract While recent studies have begun characterizing the metastatic breast cancer (MBC) genomics, our understanding of mechanisms of acquired endocrine-resistance, their induced cell-state, and their altered drug-response profile, remains lacking. We collected biopsies from patients with MBC with detailed clinicopathologic features. To date we profiled 520 exomes, and 291 transcriptomes, with 126 patients having multiple biopsy exomes. Curated endocrine-relapse set include 60 patients with pre-treatment and post-relapse exomes. Characterization of candidate mechanisms of resistance (MOR) included 909 RNA-seq profiles of T47D cells with introduced MOR under various drugs. In the acquired endocrine resistance cohort, as expected, we found frequent ESR1 acquired mutations (13 pt, 22%). Additionally, we identified acquired activating SNVs and amplifications in oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) in 18/60 (30%), including EGF family - HER2 (n=7), ERRB3 (R525Q), and EGFR (S116F), and FGF family - FGFR1 (n=5), FGFR2 (n=4), and FGF3 amplicon (n=4). RNA-seq of T47D cells overexpressing HER2 activating mutations revealed a distinct cell-state (HER2-ACT). Similarly, FGFR activation revealed a district FGFR-ACT state. The transcriptional signatures of these HER2 and FGFR states were remarkably similar (odd-ratio= 91, p= 2.64E-94). To characterize the cell-state common to HER and FGFR, we defined RTK-ACT with 358 overlapping marker genes (see table). Canonical (estradiol) ER signaling is slightly elevated in RTK-ACT, however this state is strongly associated with growth-factor driven ER signaling, suggesting reprogramming of ER from AF2, to AF1 signaling. Consistent with this, RTK-ACT had significantly higher MAPK activation. Additionally, RTK-ACT Induced stronger similarity to Basal-state, enrichment in motility/migration, mesenchymal, and stem-like features, with top genes including CDH3, MBP7, and S100, ETV, DUSP, SPRY families (see table). To study RTK-driven state in-vivo, we analyzed RNA-seq from our MBC biopsies, and compared tumors with activating RTK mutations (n=38) with WT (n=118), and inferred activated RTK in-vivo (RTK.ACT.iv). Our in-vitro and in-vivo states show significant overlap (OR=4.71, p=9.42E-20). Furthermore, characterization of RTK.ACT.iv, recapitulated all the cell-state features observed in RTK.ACT - including higher growth-factors ER signaling, MAPK, and basal-like state (see table). We further studied the viability and transcription of these RTKs under various drugs (12 treatments), including fulvestrant, palbociclib, and specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) - Neratinib (pan-HER inhibitor) and FIIN-3 (FGFR-i). We found that HER2-ACT and FGFR-ACT signatures remain robust when treated with fulvestrant, palbociclib, and their combinations, as compared to TKIs suppression (see table). in-line with our viability results - suggesting intrinsic resistance to CDK4/6i and sensitivity to TKIs. This study demonstrated that activating RTKs constitute of prevalent modality of acquired resistance to endocrine therapies, inducing a distinct state with clinical implications - suggesting the potential benefit of combination therapies with specific TKIs over CDK4/6i. The common MAPK activity and our preliminary results - suggests the potential of convergence-node targeting strategy with added MEK or SHP2 inhibition. TableGene set AGene set BOdds-ratioP-value (two-sided)Fisher''s Exact test matHER2-ACT -FGFR-ACT -912.64E-9469, 131, 131, 22704HER2 S653C, L755S, V777L, L869R vs. GFP, under DMSO, rank genes based on the logFC (top 200)FGFR1, FGFR2 (WT, N550K, M538I, K660N) vs. GFP, Parental, Under DMSO, rank genes based on the logFC (top 200)HER2-ACT_1000 -FGFR-ACT_1000 -18.98.28E-248358, 642, 642, 21758HER2 S653C, L755S, V777L, L869R vs. GFP, under DMSO, rank genes based on the logFC- top 1000FGFR1, FGFR2 (WT, N550K, M538I, K660N) vs. GFP, Parental, Under DMSO, rank genes based on the logFC - top 1000RTK-ACTHALLMARK_ESTROGEN_RESPONSE_EARLY, MSigDB3.030.004229, 191, 349, 22474RTK-ACTER driven by Growth Factors, PMID: 208897186.771.74E-059, 86, 349, 22585RTK-ACTMEK_UP.V1_UP (MAPK), MSigDB10.95.72E-1827, 169, 331, 22496RTK-ACTRAS ONCOGENE (MAPK), PMID: 162730928.445.77E-1220, 158, 338, 22553RTK-ACTWU_CELL_MIGRATION, PMID 187243907.648.96E-1119, 165, 339, 22502RTK-ACTHUPER_BREAST_BASAL_VS_LUMINAL_UP, PMID 17409405131.38E-079, 45, 349, 22621RTK-ACTHALLMARK_EPITHELIAL_MESENCHYMAL_TRANSITION, MSigDB3.770.00031411, 189, 347, 22477RTK-ACTLIM_MAMMARY_STEM_CELL_UP, PMID 203461513.119.56E-0622, 467, 336, 22205RTK-ACTRTK-ACT.iv -4.719.42E-2060, 940, 298, 21992In MBC biopsies, compare RTK mutations with WT, rank genes based on the logFC - top 1000RTK-ACT.iv (in-vivo)HALLMARK_ESTROGEN_RESPONSE_EARLY, MSigDB1.950.020316, 184, 984, 22088RTK-ACT.ivER driven by Growth Factors, PMID: 208897182.640.0076310, 85, 990, 22193RTK-ACT.ivMEK_UP.V1_UP (MAPK), MSigDB2.863.91E-0522, 174, 978, 22098RTK-ACT.ivRAS ONCOGENE (MAPK), PMID: 162730921.620.13212, 166, 988, 22152RTK-ACT.ivWU_CELL_MIGRATION, PMID 187243903.573.60E-0725, 159, 975, 22115RTK-ACT.ivHUPER_BREAST_BASAL_VS_LUMINAL_UP, PMID 174094059.515.43E-1016, 38, 984, 22235RTK-ACT.ivHALLMARK_EPITHELIAL_MESENCHYMAL_TRANSITION, MSigDB2.090.0073817, 183, 983, 22090RTK-ACT.ivLIM_MAMMARY_STEM_CELL_UP, PMID 203461511.420.089229, 460, 971, 21819HER2-ACTHER2-ACT - Fulv3006.53E-183109, 91, 91, 22750HER2-ACTHER2-ACT - Palbo2331.46E-163101, 99, 99, 22749HER2-ACTHER2.ACT - Fulv + Palbo2197.64E-15999, 101, 101, 22742HER2-ACTHER2.ACT - Neratinib63.19.78E-7257, 143, 143, 22707HER2-ACTHER2.ACT - Fulv + Neratinib59.33.53E-6855, 145, 145, 22724FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - Palbo19003.2e-319157, 43, 43, 22778FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - Fulv + Palbo12501.38E-290148, 52, 52, 22767FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - Fulv8661.72E-266140, 60, 60, 22764FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - Palbo + FIIN.31062.88E-10474, 126, 126, 22710FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - Fulv + Palbo + FIIN.378.41.14E-8464, 136, 136, 22705FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - FIIN.367.42.16E-7559, 141, 141, 22730FGFR-ACTFGFR.ACT - Fulv + FIIN.336.89.47E-4541, 159, 159, 22733 Citation Format: Ofir Cohen, Pingping Mao, Utthara Nayar, Jorge E Buendia-Bue, Dewey Kim, Esha Jain, Karla Helvie, Daniel Abravanel, Kailey J Kowalski, Christian Kapstad, Samuel Freeman, Victor Adalsteinsson, Seth A Wander, Adrienne G Waks, Gad Getz, Aviv Regev, Eric Winer P Winer, Nancy U Nancy U. Lin, Nikhil Wagle. Acquired activating mutations in RTKs confer endocrine resistance in ER+ metastatic breast cancer through ER-reprogramming, MAPK signaling, and an induced stem-like cell state [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-02.