Abstract P6-18-18: Phase I trial of eribulin and everolimus in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer
Authors: Y Yuan, S Yost, S Blanchard, H Yin, M Li, K Robinson, A Tang, N Martinez, L Leong, G Somlo, N Tank Patel, J Waisman, J Portnow, A Hurria, T-H Luu, J Mortimer
Journal: Cancer Research (2019)

Abstract Background: Alteration of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is the most common genomic abnormality detected in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Everolimus acts synergistically with eribulin in inducing apoptosis in TNBC cell lines and xenografts in our preclinical study. This phase I trial was designed to test the safety and tolerability of combining eribulin and everolimus in patients (pts) with metastatic TNBC. Methods: The overall objective of this study was to describe the safety and toxicities of the combination. The secondary objective was to assess activity based on response rate (RR) and progression free survival (PFS). Eligibility criteria included pts with metastatic TNBC, ECOG 0-2, 0-3 lines of prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting, and prior treatment with anthracycline and/or taxane therapy. The study utilized the toxicity equivalence range (TEQR) design with a target equivalence range for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of 0.20-0.35. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) will be the dose closest to the target of 0.25 below 0.51 based on isotonic regression.Three dosing levels of the combinations were tested: level A1 (everolimus 5mg daily; eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 days 1, 8 every 3 weeks), level A2 (everolimus 7.5mg daily; eribulin 1.4 mg/m2, days 1, 8 every 3 weeks), level B1(everolimus 5mg daily; eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 days 1, 8 every 3 weeks). Nanostring RNA analysis and genomic mutation analysis were conducted in 16 pts with available tumor tissue. Results: A total of 27 pts were enrolled. Median age was 55 years (range 36-76). Two pts were ineligible due to HER2+ on repeat biopsy and were only included in the toxicity analysis. Dose level B1 (everolimus 5mg daily and eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 days 1, 8 every 3 weeks) was determined to be the RP2D doses. The DLTs were neutropenia, stomatitis and hyperglycemia. Across all cycles, 59% (16/27) had a ≥ Gr3 toxicity attributed to treatment at the possible or above level. 44% (12/27) had Gr3 heme-toxicities. The most common toxicities were ≥ Gr3 neutropenia (10 pts), Gr3 lymphopenia (6 pts) and ≥ Gr3 leukopenia (7 pts). 33% (9/27) had Gr3 non-heme toxicities. The most common were Gr3 stomatitis (3 pts), Gr3 hyperglycemia (3 pts) and Gr3 fatigue (5 pts). The median number of cycles completed was 4 (0-8). 68% (17/25) had a dose modification or hold, 14 of 25 (56%) were for eribulin and 15 of 25 (60%) were for everolimus. Of 25 eligible pts, 8 (32%) achieved a best response as partial response, 11 (44%) had stable disease and 6 (24%) had progression. 80% (20/25) experienced progression by RECIST or showed clinical progression, and the median time to progression was 2.7 mo (95% CI (2.2, 4.6)). At the time of this analysis, 16 participants had died, median OS was 6.3 mo (95% CI (5.3, undefined)). Two pts are still being followed on treatment. PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway genes and mutations profiles were studied. Conclusion: Eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and everolimus 5mg daily was defined as the RP2D. Genomic analysis is currently underway to understand the molecular mechanisms of resistance. Citation Format: Yuan Y, Yost S, Blanchard S, Yin H, Li M, Robinson K, Tang A, Martinez N, Leong L, Somlo G, Tank Patel N, Waisman J, Portnow J, Hurria A, Luu T-H, Mortimer J. Phase I trial of eribulin and everolimus in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-18.