Effect of Inhaled Cannabis for Pain in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease
Authors: Donald I. Abrams, Paul Couey, Niharika Dixit, Varun Sagi, Ward Hagar, Elliott Vichinsky, Mary Ellen Kelly, John E. Connett, Kalpna Gupta
Journal: JAMA Network Open (2020)

<h3>Importance</h3> Sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by chronic pain and episodic acute pain caused by vasoocclusive crises, often requiring high doses of opioids for prolonged periods. In humanized mouse models of SCD, a synthetic cannabinoid has been found to attenuate both chronic and acute hyperalgesia. The effect of cannabis on chronic pain in adults with SCD is unknown. <h3>Objective</h3> To determine whether inhaled cannabis is more effective than inhaled placebo in relieving chronic pain in adults with SCD. <h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3> This pilot randomized clinical trial included participants with SCD with chronic pain admitted to a single inpatient clinical research center for 2 separate 5-day stays from August 2014 to April 2017. Participants inhaled either vaporized cannabis (4.4% Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol to 4.9% cannabidiol) 3 times daily or vaporized placebo cannabis. Pain and pain interference ratings using the Brief Pain Inventory were assessed throughout each 5-day period. Participants with SCD and chronic pain on stable analgesics were eligible to enroll. A total of 90 participants were assessed for eligibility; 56 participants were deemed ineligible, and 34 participants were enrolled. Of these, 7 participants dropped out before randomization. Of 27 randomized participants, 23 completed both treatment arms of the crossover study and were included in the final per protocol analysis. Data analysis was completed in June 2019, with the sensitivity analysis conducted in April 2020. <h3>Interventions</h3> Inhalation of vaporized cannabis plant (4.4% Δ-9-tetrahydrocannbinol to 4.9% cannabidiol) or placebo cannabis plant using a vaporizer 3 times daily for 5 days. <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> Daily pain assessed with visual analog scale and Brief Pain Inventory. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 23 participants (mean [SD] age, 37.6 [11.4] years; 13 [56%] women) completed the trial. The mean (SD) difference in pain rating assessment between the cannabis and placebo groups was −5.3 (8.1) for day 1, −10.9 (7.0) for day 2, −16.5 (9.2) for day 3, −8.9 (6.7) for day 4, and −8.2 (8.1) for day 5; however, none of these differences were statistically significant. There was no statistically significant mean (SD) difference in pain interference ratings between cannabis and placebo between days 1 and 5 for interference in general activities (day 1: 0.27 [0.35]; day 5: −1.0 [0.5]), walking (day 1: 0.14 [0.73]; day 5: −0.87 [0.63]), sleep (day 1: 0.59 [0.74]; day 5: −1.3 [0.8]), or enjoyment (day 1: 0.23 [0.69]; day 5: −0.91 [0.48]), but there was a statistically significant mean (SD) difference in decrease in interference with mood (day 1: 0.96 [0.59]; day 5: −1.4 [0.6];<i>P</i> = .02). No differences in treatment-related adverse effects were observed. Use of concomitant opioids was similar during both treatment periods. <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> This randomized clinical trial found that, compared with vaporized placebo, vaporized cannabis did not statistically significantly reduce pain and associated symptoms, except interference in mood, in patients with SCD with chronic pain. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT01771731