SAT0182 THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN AUTOANTIBODIES AND RITUXIMAB RESPONSE IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS
Authors: D. Li, H. Lu, J. Dunphy, T. Smith, E. Vital, I. N. Bruce, N. Mchugh
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2020)

Background: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is clinically and immunologically heterogeneous with a variable response to treatment. MASTERPLANS is an MRC-funded consortium that seeks to identify immunophenotypic subgroups of patients that predict response to therapy. Autoantibody profiles can differentiate subgroups of patients and have potential to predict response to treatment. Objectives: To determine whether known and novel autoantibodies are associated with response to rituximab (RTX), and analyse the association between these antibodies and disease involvement in various organ systems. Methods: Serum was obtained from 224 SLE patients in the BILAG Biologics Registry who received rituximab according to NHS England criteria (2). Patients were recruited if they were starting a first cycle of rituximab for active SLE (BILAG A or 2xBILAG B) despite previous cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil. Evidence of any single organ system involvement previous or current was taken as having a BILAG score of A-D but not E. Disease activity was measured using BILAG-2004. Clinical response was defined as improvement by &gt;=1 grade in active BILAG-2004 systems with no worsening in other systems. Autoantibodies were measured by immunoprecipitation of proteins by sera from 35 S-labelled K562 cell lines, followed by SDS-PAGE separation and autoradiography. Autoantibodies not able to be detected by this technique (anti-Ro52, anti-dsDNA and aCL) were measured by ELISA. Autoantibody data was analysed in IBM SPSS and GraphPad Prism v8.2. Association between autoantibodies and RTX response was analysed using binary logistic interaction terms and Pearson’s Chi-Square test. Results: Of the 224 patients (201 female, 23 male, median age 40 years) the most common system involvement from the 9 BILAG domains was musculoskeletal (164 patients) and the least ophthalmic (11 patients). Patients with anti-Ro52 and anti-U1RNP/Sm had more frequent involvement of mucocutaneous ( p &lt;0.036, p &lt;0.012) and musculoskeletal domains ( p &lt;0.015 for U1RNP) respectively. There were 136 patients with sufficient data to define as either responders (n=67) or non-responders (n=69) to RTX at 6 months. RTX responders had a higher frequency of anti-U1RNP/Sm compared to non-responders (Figure 1). Further Pearson’s Chi-Square analysis showed a significant association between presence of anti-U1RNP/Sm and better response to RTX ( p &lt;0.018). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the presence of U1RNP/Sm autoantibodies in a cohort of patients who have received treatment with RTX is associated with more frequent musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous involvement and predicts a more favourable response to treatment. Acknowledgments : Funded by a grant from the Medical Research Council, grant number MR/M01665X/1. BILAG BR has been funded by unrestricted educational donations from Roche, GSK and LUPUS UK. Part-funded by a grant from LUPUS UK. Disclosure of Interests: : Danyang Li: None declared, Hui Lu: None declared, Juliet Dunphy: None declared, Theresa Smith: None declared, Edward Vital Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, and Sandoz, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, GSK, Roche/Genentech, and Sandoz, Speakers bureau: Becton Dickinson and GSK, Ian N. Bruce Grant/research support from: Genzyme Sanofi, GSK, and UCB, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, UCB, Iltoo, and Merck Serono, Speakers bureau: UCB, Neil McHugh: None declared