Abstract P2-01-02: Whole exome sequencing analysis of the progression from ductal carcinoma <i>in situ</i> to invasive ductal carcinoma
Authors: JY Lee, R Bi, F Pareja, FC Geyer, D Brown, HY Wen, L Norton, J Hicks, B Weigelt, JS Reis-Filho
Journal: Cancer Research (2019)

Abstract Introduction: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a bona fide non-obligate precursor of invasive carcinoma. Single cell sequencing studies have revealed intra-lesion genetic heterogeneity in DCIS and shown that progression to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) may occur through different mechanisms, including the selection of a subpopulation of tumor cells, acquisition of new genetic alterations or multi-clonal invasion. Here, we sought to investigate the genetic heterogeneity of DCIS, and to document further the clonal selection process accompanying progression to IDC. Materials and methods: Synchronous DCIS (n=16) and IDC (n=15) samples from 14 patients were microdissected separately, and DNA samples of tumor and matched normal tissues were subjected to whole-exome sequencing (WES; n=27) or massively parallel targeted sequencing of all coding regions of ≥410 cancer-related genes (n=4). Somatic genetic alterations and mutational signatures were identified using state-of-the-art bioinformatics algorithms. PyClone was employed to define the clonal architecture of each DCIS and IDC and infer the clonal shifts accompanying progression from DCIS to IDC. Results: DCIS were found to harbor recurrent somatic mutations affecting PIK3CA (50%), GATA3 (44%), TP53 (38%), CBFB (19%), PTEN (13%), and AKT1 (13%), which are genes known to be significantly mutated in invasive breast cancers. Despite the genomic similarities between matched DCIS and IDCs, NOTCH2 and MYC were found to be amplified solely in the IDC component of two cases, and PPM1D amplification was restricted to the DCIS component of another case. The mutational signature ascribed to aging (i.e. signature 1) was the predominant mutational signature in the DCIS and IDCs analyzed. PyClone analysis revealed that all synchronous DCIS and IDC studied here were clonally related and confirmed the previous observation that DCIS displays intra-lesion genetic heterogeneity. Evidence of clonal selection in the progression from DCIS to IDC was observed in three cases, whereby a minor DCIS subclone likely constituted the substrate for the development of IDC. In one of these cases, from a patient with a BRCA1 germline pathogenic mutation, we observed a shift from the mutational signature associated with defective homologous recombination DNA repair (i.e. signature 3) to the APOBEC-related mutational signatures (i.e. signatures 2 and 13) in the progression from DCIS to IDC. Conclusion: Intra-lesion genetic heterogeneity is a common feature in DCIS synchronously diagnosed with IDC. Our findings corroborate the notion that DCIS is a direct non-obligate precursor of IDC, and that clonal selection in the progression of DCIS to IDC may be present in a subset of cases, but is unlikely to constitute the most frequent mechanism of progression. Citation Format: Lee JY, Bi R, Pareja F, Geyer FC, Brown D, Wen HY, Norton L, Hicks J, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Whole exome sequencing analysis of the progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive ductal carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-01-02.