Abstract P6-07-17: A novel fluorescence in situ hybridization assay to detect 9p24.1 amplification in triple negative breast cancer
Authors: M Chen, M Andreozzi, B Pockaj, MT Barrett, IT Ocal, AE McCullough, KS Anderson
Journal: Cancer Research (2017)

Abstract Introduction: Previously, we detected amplification of chromosome 9p24.1 encoding PDL1, PDL2, and JAK2 (the PDJ amplicon) in up to 25% of triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) using oligonucleotide CGH arrays (aCGH). Amplification was associated with poor outcome and activation of the JAK/STAT pathway. Here, we have developed a novel fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detection of the JAK2/PDL1 amplification. Methods: We selected five 9p24.1-amplified and five non-amplified paraffin embedded TNBC tumor samples, defined by aCGH log2ratio&amp;gt;2.0 as amplified for FISH validation. 5' JAK2 DNA labeled with SpectrumGreen dUTP, 3' JAK2 DNA labeled in SpectrumOrange dUTP and a commercially available chromosome 9 centromeric probe (Spectrum Aqua) were combined as one probe set. The break-apart (BAP) probe set was applied to individual slides, hybridized, and washed, 50 events/sample were counted. We defined 9p24.1 amplification by FISH as the ratio of average JAK2 score/ average centromere 9 (CEN 9) score &amp;gt;1.1. Nonparametric student's t-test was used for statistical analysis. Results: In the amplified subgroup (n=5), JAK2 amplification was detected by FISH with the range from 1.89 to 21.0 (mean, 6.76). To adjust for aneuploidy, the ratio of JAK2 to CEN 9 was measured with the range from 1.02 to 9.21 (mean ratio, 2.9). The sample with highest level of amplification (aCGH log2ratio =4) detected by aCGH also scored highest by FISH (FISH ratio=9.21). One case with JAK2 amplification (aCGH log2ratio =3) was not detected by FISH (ratio, 1.02), but had low tumor cell content. In the non-amplification subgroup (n=5), JAK2 amplification was detected by FISH with the range from 0.98 to 3.54 (mean, 1.8), the ratio of JAK2 to CEN 9 was measured with the range from 0.48 to1.05 (mean, 0.73). Of note, two tumors with copy number loss by aCGH were confirmed by FISH (ratio 0.48, 0.56). In total, the 9p24.1 amplification was detected in 4 out 5 (80%) amplified samples defined by aCGH and 5 out 5 not amplified. A significant difference in JAK2: CEN 9 ratio (p=0.03) was observed between the amplified and non-amplified subgroups but not in JAK2 absolute scores (p=0.095). Conclusion: In this study, we have developed a novel FISH assay for detection of the 9p24.1 amplification in TNBC, encoding JAK2, PD-L1, and PD-L2. The FISH assay correlates with detection of the amplification by aCGH, but is less sensitive, in particular in tissue with lower tumor cell content. We predict that 9p24.1 amplification will be a clinically relevant biomarker in TNBC. Citation Format: Chen M, Andreozzi M, Pockaj B, Barrett MT, Ocal IT, McCullough AE, Anderson KS. A novel fluorescence in situ hybridization assay to detect 9p24.1 amplification in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-07-17.