Abstract P3-12-03: Evaluation of women with <i>BRCA</i> mutations and breast cancer tested at an NCI designated comprehensive cancer center: A cost of illness estimation
Authors: JE Biskupiak, C Telford, M Yoo, SK Unni, X Ye, R Deka, DI Brixner, DD Stenehjem
Journal: Cancer Research (2017)

Abstract Objectives: Little is known regarding the impact of mutation status on the costs of breast cancer care. This study sought to estimate health care charges (all-cause, BC related, other cancer related and non-cancer related) among women with breast cancer (BC) and BRCA mutations (BRCAm) in terms of BRCA status, HER2 expression status, ER/PR status, treatment patterns, serious adverse events related to the cancer or its treatment, and cancer treatment period. Methods: Adult women with invasive BC diagnosed from 1995-2014 and tested for a BRCAm were identified from the Huntsman Cancer Institute tumor registry (Salt Lake City, Utah) and via chart review. Patients with available charge data were included in the study. Patients were categorized by mutation status, receptor status and initial treatment setting. Charges were categorized as inpatient, outpatient and pharmacy (both anticancer and other medication) related charges as well as by type of service (diagnosis, surgery, reconstruction, radiation, office visit, and medication). Descriptive statistics were used to describe mean (SD) charges. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was used to compare health care charges. Results: There were 816 women with BC who underwent BRCA testing and had available charge data. There were 134 women with a BRCAm vs 682 with BRCA wild type (wt). Age at diagnosis was similar between the two groups, however, BRCAm patients had more triple negative BC and higher histologic grade. Total breast cancer related mean (SD) charges were similar between BRCAm vs BRCAwt ($86,689 (75,937) vs $85,843 (97,304), p=0.19). Of this a similar amount was due to facilities/ technical and pharmacy (41% each), while the remainder was physician/professional costs. Within pharmacy costs, similar amounts were due to chemotherapy (23%) and biologics (21%). However, while 58% received chemotherapy, only 8% received biologics. Patients seen initially in the neoadjuvant treatment setting (N=148) had higher breast cancer related mean charges than those in the adjuvant setting (N=553; $117,922 (102,108) vs $80,061 (90,010), p&amp;lt;.0001), while those seen initially in metastatic setting had a mean charge of $103,525 (135,029).There were 142 HER2+ (ER+/PR+/HER2+ or ER-/PR-/HER2+) and 521 HER2- (TNBC or ER-/PR+/HER2-) breast cancer patients (receptor status unknown in 153 patients). HER2+ patients had higher breast cancer related mean charges than HER2- patients ($155,858 (122,227) vs $69,883 (67,642), p&amp;lt;.0001). Further, anticancer treatment charges accounted for 53% ($82,890 (81,269)) of HER2+ costs and 11% ($7,929 (21,782)), p&amp;lt;.0001 of HER2- costs. Biologics accounted for 87% of the former and chemotherapy accounted for 78% of the latter charge. Conclusions: Mutation status was not associated with higher breast cancer charges. Patients initially seen in the neoadjuvant setting had higher breast cancer charges than those seen in the adjuvant setting. Receptor status (being HER2+) was associated with higher breast cancer charges and this was driven by expenditure on biologics. Citation Format: Biskupiak JE, Telford C, Yoo M, Unni SK, Ye X, Deka R, Brixner DI, Stenehjem DD. Evaluation of women with BRCA mutations and breast cancer tested at an NCI designated comprehensive cancer center: A cost of illness estimation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-03.