Abstract 3379: Massively parallel sequencing analysis of breast adenomyoepitheliomas reveals the heterogeneity of the disease and identifies a subset driven by <i>HRAS</i> hotspot mutations
Authors: Felipe C. Geyer, Kathleen A. Burke, Anqi Li, Anastasios D. Papanastatiou, Fresia Pareja, Anne S. Schulteis, Charlotte K. Ng, Salvatore Piscuoglio, Marcia Edelweiss, Luciano G. Martelotto, Pier Selenica, Maria R. Filippo, Gabriel S. Macedo, Achim Jungbluth, Hannah Y. Wen, Juan Palazzo, Zsuzsanna Varga, Emad Rakha, Ian O. Ellis, Brian Rubin, Britta Weigelt, Jorge S. Reis-Filho
Journal: Cancer Research (2017)

Abstract Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) is a rare biphasic proliferative breast lesion, which may resemble salivary gland epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas (EMCs). Most AMEs have an indolent clinical course, but malignant transformation and local and distant recurrences have been reported. We sought to define the mutational landscape of AMEs and investigate the functional impact of recurrent likely pathogenic mutations identified in these tumors. Nineteen AMEs were subjected to whole-exome massively parallel sequencing (MPS, n=7) or targeted capture MPS using MSK-IMPACT assay (n=12). Somatic genetic alterations and the cancer cell fraction of mutations were defined using state-of-the-art bioinformatics algorithms. Selected genes (i.e. HRAS and PIK3CA) were subjected to Sanger sequencing in a series of 17 additional AMEs (total n=36). Non-tumorigenic mammary epithelial cells (i.e. MCF10A, MCF10A with the PIK3CAH1047R mutation and MCF12A), which are estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, were utilized for 2D and 3D functional studies. Of 36 cases, 22 were ER-positive and 14 were ER-negative. MPS analysis revealed a low mutation burden and HRASQ61 and PIK3CA hotspot mutations in 6/19 (32%) and 11/19 (58%) AMEs, respectively. All HRASQ61 and all but one PIK3CA mutations were clonal. ER-positive and ER-negative AMEs were fundamentally histologically and genetically distinct. Whilst ER-positive AMEs displayed recurrent PIK3CA mutations (50%, 11/22) but lacked HRAS mutations, ER-negative AMEs displayed, in addition to PIK3CA mutations (57%, 8/14), recurrent HRASQ61 mutations (57%, 8/14). HRASQ61 mutations co-occurred with PIK3CA mutations (50%, 4/8), PIK3R1 deletions (12.5%, 1/8) and/or CDKN2A homozygous deletions (25%, 2/8). HRASQ61 mutations, but not PIK3CA mutations, were significantly associated with ER-negativity (100% vs 21%), concurrent carcinoma (50% vs 7%), axillary metastases (38% vs 0%), high proliferation (63% vs 4%), necrosis (63% vs 11%) and nuclear pleomorphism (75% vs 29%). In vitro forced HRASQ61R expression in MCF10A and MCF12A cells resulted in increased proliferation and transformation. In 3D organotypic cell cultures, forced HRASQ61R resulted in a highly disorganized growth pattern, a partial loss of epithelial phenotype and acquisition of aberrant myoepithelial differentiation, which was more overt in PIK3CA-mutant MCF10A cells. In conclusion, AMEs are phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous. Whilst PIK3CA hotspot mutations occur across the spectrum of lesions, HRASQ61 hotspot mutations are restricted to ER-negative AMEs, which should arguably be classified as breast EMCs. Our genomic and functional analyses are consistent with the notion that HRASQ61 mutations are driver events in the pathogenesis of ER-negative AMEs and may be sufficient for the acquisition of myoepithelial differentiation in breast cells. Citation Format: Felipe C. Geyer, Kathleen A. Burke, Anqi Li, Anastasios D. Papanastatiou, Fresia Pareja, Anne S. Schulteis, Charlotte K. Ng, Salvatore Piscuoglio, Marcia Edelweiss, Luciano G. Martelotto, Pier Selenica, Maria R. Filippo, Gabriel S. Macedo, Achim Jungbluth, Hannah Y. Wen, Juan Palazzo, Zsuzsanna Varga, Emad Rakha, Ian O. Ellis, Brian Rubin, Britta Weigelt, Jorge S. Reis-Filho. Massively parallel sequencing analysis of breast adenomyoepitheliomas reveals the heterogeneity of the disease and identifies a subset driven by HRAS hotspot mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3379. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3379