Framing planetary health: arguing for resource-centred science
Authors: David J Acunzo, Gérard Escher, Ole P Ottersen, Jason D Whittington, Philippe Gillet, Nils C Stenseth, Ioan Negrutiu
Journal: The Lancet Planetary Health (2018)

Nature's goods and services are assets that shape human history, socioeconomic systems, and geopolitics.1United Nations Environment ProgramManaging and Conserving the Natural Resource Base for Sustained Economic and Social Development. An input from the International Resource Panel.https://www.irforum.org/sites/default/files/publications/Managing%20And%20Conserving%20The%20Natural%20Resource%20Base.pdfDate: 2014Google Scholar They are the ultimate foundation of life and health, the substance of human rights. Humans are, individually and collectively, resource driven. However, humans frame resources incorrectly. Namely, governance systems underestimate the fact that economic and social development has been achieved through the unsustainable management of resources. They also create profitable scarcities and resource overexploitation leading to social inequity and environmental degradation and are not equipped to handle challenges such as the implementation and accountability of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)2Stokstad E Sustainable goals from UN under fire.Science. 2015; 347: 702-703Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar because resource governance across sectors and institutions does not exist.3United Nations Environment Program International Resource Panel 2015Policy coherence of the sustainable development goals. UNEP, Paris2015https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/9720/-Policy_Coherence_of_the_Sustainable_Development_Goals_A_Natural_Resource_Perspective-2015Policy_Coherence_of_the_Sustainable_Development_Goals_-_A_N.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=yGoogle Scholar Yet, 13 of the 17 SDGs make resources the measure of equitable and sustainable development in social, economic, political, cultural, and environmental terms. We postulate that a resource-centred approach is the most parsimonious instrument to implement the SDGs while safeguarding the integrity of Earth's ecosystems. This approach is important because the major mutually enforcing stressors on public health and natural resources are4Ehrlich PR Kareiva PM Daily GC Securing natural capital and expanding equity to rescale civilization.Nature. 2012; 486: 68-73Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar, 5Ottersen OP Dasgupta J Blouin C et al.The political origins of health inequity: prospects for change.Lancet. 2014; 383: 630-667Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar (over)consumption coupled with socioeconomic inequalities, concentration of economic and financial dominance to drive political decision, and institutional inertia, enforced by inadequate norms and poor accountability and transparency. To act on these determinants, radical changes in resource governance and allocation must consider long-term socioecological threats via the inclusive planetary health concept, integrating the “health of human civilisation and the state of the natural systems on which it depends”.6Whitmee S Haines A Beyrer C et al.Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health.Lancet. 2015; 386: 1973-2028Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1125) Google Scholar A reframed resource governance should consider the life-supporting capacities of ecosystems, population dynamics, and consumption patterns in given territories4Ehrlich PR Kareiva PM Daily GC Securing natural capital and expanding equity to rescale civilization.Nature. 2012; 486: 68-73Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar as well as basic human rights and duties. A resource-centred science can facilitate the design of a systems approach toward an integrated resource stewardship operating across disciplines and resource user groups. This approach will provide decision makers with sound scientific evidence and facts, making clear that the principle of sustainability is not compatible with the policy and politics that subordinate the health of humans and natural systems to short-term economic goals. It will also contribute to a better understanding of the limits imposed by the finite world and by defining means to reconcile human needs with available resources. To that end, the resource-centred science has two requirements. First, a permanent alliance between natural sciences and legal and political studies is needed to integrate and articulate normative and legal instruments that provide fair access to resources for all, impose accountability of resource overuse and degradation, and help to achieve sustainable levels of resource use. For example, these objectives can lead to new forms of education, training, and practices that mobilise universities, other organisations and institutions, and resource user groups. Second, tools are needed to analyse, quantify, and simulate at different scales the matching between societal demand (expressed in satisfaction of basic needs) and sustainable supply (expressed in the fair access to resources and the true capacity to preserve life-supporting functions and services of the ecosystems). For example, natural capital accounting tools6Whitmee S Haines A Beyrer C et al.Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health.Lancet. 2015; 386: 1973-2028Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1125) Google Scholar, 7Schultz L Folke C Österblom H Olssen P Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112: 7369-7374Crossref PubMed Scopus (178) Google Scholar exploit (near) real-time environmental and socioeconomic data streams measuring ecological values and degradation (such as land use changes, ecosystem services, or planetary boundaries) and associated health effects and costs.8Myers SS Planetary health: protecting human health on a rapidly changing plant.Lancet. 2018; 390: 2860-2868Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar The challenge is to incorporate these indicators into GDP-centred national accounting systems and into policy decision making. Resource-centred science rests on a framework assembling three simple universal principles with the imperative of natural resource stewardship and fair allocation, and the inclusive planetary health concept. The principles promote human rights and duties and build upon the inclusive UN Economic and Social Council injunction (1994) that “civil, cultural, economic, political, and social rights are universal, interdependent, and indivisible” and observing the “relationship between the quality of the environment and the enjoyment of basic human rights”, which was first recognised by the UN General Assembly in 1968. The inclusive health concept (health for people, societies, and ecosystems) expresses the interconnectedness of processes in the framework, seen as synergistic leverage factors of transformative change (table).TableFoundations of resource-centred sciencePrinciples: political endorsement framePlanetary health: cultural acceptance narrativeLevel 1Inclusive resource stewardshipIndividuals—universal social protection floorLevel 2Human rights and wellbeingSociety—effective public healthLevel 3Human duties and environmental responsibilityEcosystems—life support capacity maintainedPrinciples dictate the political endorsement frame. The cultural acceptance narrative is defined by an inclusive health concept. It aims to jointly implement a universal social protection floor and effective public health and environmental protection policies. Open table in a new tab Principles dictate the political endorsement frame. The cultural acceptance narrative is defined by an inclusive health concept. It aims to jointly implement a universal social protection floor and effective public health and environmental protection policies. The framework is designed to counteract power asymmetries and other deleterious socioecosystemic determinants and operate as a common base overarching the diversity of emergent transition experiments across the world. A proof of concept case is the New Zealand Resource Management Act,9New Zealand ParliamentResource management act 1991. Public act 1991, no 69.http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1991/0069/latest/whole.html#DLM230265Google Scholar a pioneering reform toward an integrated natural resource sustainable management system. Other examples are the Vermont Common Assets Trust programme,10Farley J Costanza R Flomenhoft G Kirk D The Vermont Common Assets Trust: an institution for sustainable, just and efficient resource allocation.Ecol Econ. 2015; 109: 71-79Crossref Scopus (27) Google Scholar the EU5P initiative to reform the EU through social innovations,11De Schutter O The EU's fifth project: transitional governance in the service of sustainable societies. Social Sciences Research Network, May 8, 2014https://ssrn.com/abstract=2479193Google Scholar and the hundreds of optimistic utopias12Bennett EM Solan M Biggs R et al.Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene.Front Ecology Environ. 2016; 14: 441-448Crossref Scopus (263) Google Scholar that shape the future through creative, bottom-up trajectories that change human–environmental relationships. To generalise such achievements, a health and resource-centred thinking in policy and governance should become the norm. For example, our framework is consistent with updating and enacting the UN conference on trade and employment known as the Havana charter for an international trade organization.13United Nations Conference On Trade And Employment in Havana, Cuba. International Trade Organization, New YorkApril 1948https://treaties.un.org/doc/source/docs/E_CONF.2_78-E.pdfGoogle Scholar Such a novel architecture would balance the missions and activities of the Food and Agriculture Organization and the International Labor Organization with those of the World Bank, the International Monetary Foundation, and the World Trade Organization under the umbrella of a joint UN Development Program and UN Environment Program and an enforced resource panel, the International Resource Panel.3United Nations Environment Program International Resource Panel 2015Policy coherence of the sustainable development goals. UNEP, Paris2015https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/9720/-Policy_Coherence_of_the_Sustainable_Development_Goals_A_Natural_Resource_Perspective-2015Policy_Coherence_of_the_Sustainable_Development_Goals_-_A_N.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=yGoogle Scholar In summary, resources are determinants of societal health and development and stand as the foundation of SDGs through social justice, environmental responsibility, and cultural acceptance. The goal of the resource-centred science is to translate and incorporate the framework into knowledge-led approaches and scientific evidence-based decision making by developing new objects of law and new forms of institutions for resource stewardship. We declare no competing interests.