Abstract P6-12-01: Can exercise influence survival following breast cancer? Evidence from randomised, controlled trials
Authors: SC Hayes, M Steele, R Spence, L Gordon, D Battistutta, J Bashford, C Pyke, C Saunders, E Eakin
Journal: Cancer Research (2018)

Abstract Background: The Exercise for Health (EfH) trials were randomized, controlled trials designed to evaluate an 8-month pragmatic, exercise intervention, commencing 6 weeks post-surgery for women with newly diagnosed breast cancer residing in urban- or rural/regional areas. Outcomes for these exploratory analyses were overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: Consenting urban-residing women (EfH 1, n=194) and rural/regional-residing women (EfH 2, n=143) were randomized to exercise or usual care. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for OS, BCS and DFS (exercise group, n=207, 65% urban women; usual care group, n=130, 46% urban women), with and without adjustment for prognostic factors including trial (urban/rural), age, body mass index, disease stage and presence of comorbidities. Further exploratory subgroup analyses were also conducted to assess whether effect on OS, BCS and DFS differed according to prognostic variables. Results: After a median follow-up of 8.3 years (IQR: 8.0-8.7 years) there were 11 (5.3%) deaths in the exercise group compared with 15 (11.5%) deaths in the usual care group (Table 1). Table 1 Overall, breast cancer-specific and disease-free survival events by group allocation. All patientsUsual careExercise n=337n = 130n = 207 n (%)n (%)n (%)Breast cancer-related deaths20 (5.9)10 (7.7)10 (4.8)Non-breast cancer-related deaths6 (1.8)5 (3.8)1 (0.5)Overall survival events26 (7.7)15 (11.5)11 (5.3)Recurrence of breast cancer20 (5.9)8 (6.2)12 (5.8)Alive at follow-up9 (2.7)3 (2.3)6 (4.6)Deceased by follow-up11 (3.3)5 (3.1)6 (4.6)New primary breast cancer13 (3.9)5 (3.8)8 (3.9)Alive at follow-up13 (3.9)5 (3.8)8 (6.2)Deceased by follow-up0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)Disease-free survival events*48 (14.2)23 (17.7)25 (12.1)* Disease-free survival events include recurrence of breast cancer, new primary breast cancers, and all-cause deaths. Note that women who had recurrence and died before follow-up only count once towards disease-free survival events. HRs for the exercise group were: OS: 0.45, 95% CI=0.20-0.96; p=0.04; BCS: 0.61, 95% CI=0.25-1.46, p=0.26; and DFS: 0.66, 95% CI=0.38-1.17; p=0.16 (adjusted analyses yielded similar results). With the exception of BCS for those with a body mass index &amp;gt;30, all HRs for subgroup analyses favored exercise, with effect on OS for women of younger age (&amp;lt;55), those with stage II+ disease, and those with 1+ comorbidity at baseline significant (p&amp;lt;0.05). Effect of exercise on DFS was also significant (p&amp;lt;0.05) for urban women. Conclusion: Findings suggest that an individually-prescribed and monitored exercise program integrated during and beyond treatment for breast cancer, and that was designed to cater for all women, irrespective of place of residence and access to health services, has clear potential to influence survival. Citation Format: Hayes SC, Steele M, Spence R, Gordon L, Battistutta D, Bashford J, Pyke C, Saunders C, Eakin E. Can exercise influence survival following breast cancer? Evidence from randomised, controlled trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-01.