P4-11-21: A Retrospective Analysis of Women at Increased Lifetime Risk for Breast Cancer: Referral Patterns to Subspecialty Providers, Recommendations and Outcomes.
Authors: S Ehsani, A Tevaarwerk, L Wilke, H Neuman, C Beckman, J Becker, A Stettner, R Strigel, L Szalkucki, M Burkard, KB Wisinski
Journal: Cancer Research (2011)

Abstract Background: Inheritance of an abnormal BRCA 1/2 gene, a family history of breast cancer (BrCa), or a personal history of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), atypical hyperplasia, or chest wall radiation can significantly increase an individual's lifetime risk for developing BrCa. In 2007, the American Cancer Society (ACS) released updated guidelines for screening in women with a lifetime risk of BrCa ≥20-25%. These guidelines added MRI screening to annual mammography. The objective of our analysis is to characterize patients referred after the release of the 2007 ACS guidelines to subspecialty providers specifically for evaluation of BrCa risk and analyze subsequent screening and risk reduction recommendations in the cohort of patients (pts) with a predicted increased lifetime risk for BrCa. Methods: Pts seen at a single center (University of Wisconsin [UW]) between 1/2007-3/2011 by medical, surgical and/or gynecology-oncology for an increased lifetime risk of BrCa were identified by billing codes or evaluation in the UW Breast Cancer Prevention, Assessment and Tailored Health Screening (PATHS) Clinic. Pts with a personal history of BrCa prior to 1/2007 are excluded. Patients with a known genetic predisposition to BrCa, family history of breast cancer, or a personal history of LCIS, atypical hyperplasia or chest wall radiation are included in this analysis. All charts will be evaluated for documentation of the individual's lifetime risk of BrCa and method used for risk-assessment, recommended and performed screening tests, concordance with ACS screening guidelines, patient adherence to initial and subsequent screening recommendations, and uptake of risk reduction strategies. Call-back rates for additional or follow-up imaging and/or biopsy following BrCa screening and characteristics of all new BrCa diagnoses will be collected. Results: 240 eligible pts were seen during the study period. 15% of pts referred had a known genetic predisposition to BrCa. Most pts (75%) were referred for a family history of BrCa. The majority of these pts had a predicted lifetime risk of BrCa in excess of 20%, with less than 10% of patients being referred having a lifetime risk &amp;lt;20%. The remaining pts were referred for a personal history of LCIS, atypical hyperplasia or previous radiation to the chest wall. Results including subspecialty provider BrCa risk assessment, screening and risk-reduction recommendations, patient uptake and adherence, outcomes of screening and characteristics of diagnosed BrCa cases will be presented. Conclusion: Pts with a predicted increased lifetime risk for BrCa are often evaluated by oncology subspecialty providers. The primary factor related to referral is family history of BrCa. The majority of patients referred to a subspecialty provider have a calculated lifetime risk for BrCa in excess of 20%. This study evaluates provider assessment of BrCa risk and subsequent recommendations for screening and discussion of risk reduction strategies. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-21.