Abstract P5-08-03: Prognostic impact of the combined risk groups by breast cancer index and HOXB13/IL17BR ratio in hormonal receptor positive, node negative breast cancer: A TransATAC study
Authors: Y Zhang, I Sestak, BE Schroeder, M Dowsett, J Cuzick, CA Schnabel, DC Sgroi
Journal: Cancer Research (2016)

Abstract Background: Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a gene expression-based assay that reports two distinct results: 1) BCI predictive based on HoxB13/IL17BR ratio (H/I), and 2) BCI prognostic based on an algorithm incorporating H/I with the Molecular Grade index (MGI). Both biomarkers have been validated independently in randomized trial cohorts. However, integrated results to better correlate recurrence risk with endocrine response have not been evaluated. The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to examine patient outcomes within BCI prognostic and predictive groups using the translational arm of the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial (TransATAC). Methods: Primary tumor samples (N=742) from hormonal receptor-positive, N0 breast cancer patients treated with 5 years of tamoxifen (TAM) or anastrozole (ANA) in the ATAC trial were examined. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine the risk of distant recurrence (DR) in patient subgroups derived from BCI and H/I results. A separate series of clinical cases submitted for BCI testing (N=853) were analyzed to determine distribution of the combined BCI and H/I groups in clinical practice. Results: Summary of patient distribution across the 6 BCI clinical subgroups showed that a large number of patients (331/742, 45%) were BCI low risk with low likelihood of benefit, whereas 108/742 (15%) of patients with endocrine responsive disease (High H/I) were classified as BCI low risk (Table 1). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients classified as BCI low risk had a very similar 10-year risk of DR irrespective of H/I status (H/I low: 5.5% vs. H/I high: 4.0%), indicating that prognosis was largely determined by BCI vs H/I. Table 1: Distribution of BCI and H/I risk groups in TransATAC BCI: PrognosticH/I: PredictiveLow RiskIntermediate RiskHigh RiskTotalLow Likelihood3318717435 (59%)High Likelihood10895104307 (41%)Total439 (59%)182 (25%)121 (16%)742 In 853 node negative cases submitted for BCI clinical testing, the distribution of BCI and H/I risk groups were similar to that from the TransATAC cohort (Table 2). Table 2: Distribution of BCI and H/I risk groups in clinical cases submitted for BCI testing BCI: PrognosticH/I: PredictiveLow RiskIntermediate RiskHigh RiskTotalLow Likelihood36410523492 (58%)High Likelihood96107158361 (42%)Total460 (54%)212 (25%)181 (21%)853 Discussion: Both prognostic and predictive components reported from the BCI assay may be used to stratify patients into 6 clinical subgroups based on prognostic risk of distant recurrence and endocrine responsiveness. Findings from this analysis indicate that patients classified as BCI low risk, regardless of H/I status, had sufficiently low DR rates and identifies patients that may be adequately treated with 5 years of endocrine therapy. Citation Format: Zhang Y, Sestak I, Schroeder BE, Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Schnabel CA, Sgroi DC. Prognostic impact of the combined risk groups by breast cancer index and HOXB13/IL17BR ratio in hormonal receptor positive, node negative breast cancer: A TransATAC study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-03.