AB0254 Severity and Improvement of Morning Stiffness Independently Associate with Tenosynovitis in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Authors: Y. Kobayashi, K. Ikeda, M. Yamagata, T. Nakamura, T. Nakazawa, S. Tanaka, S. Furuta, T. Umibe, H. Nakajima
Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2016)

<h3>Background</h3> Morning stiffness has long been recognized by both patients and rheumatologists as a characteristic feature of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, morning stiffness is no more included in 2010 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for RA [1] or in major instruments for evaluating disease activity of RA such as Disease Activity Score (DAS) [2] and 2011 ACR/EULAR Provisional Definition of Remission [3] for the lack of solid evidence for its independent value. <h3>Objectives</h3> We aimed to clarify the associations between morning stiffness and synovial inflammation and determine the independent value and the optimal measurement of morning stiffness in patients with RA. <h3>Methods</h3> We enrolled 76 consecutive RA patients who underwent musculoskeletal ultrasound and agreed to participate in the study. In addition to asking the duration of morning stiffness, we asked patients to complete a diagram which represents the time course of their morning stiffness in the dominant hand. We also determined the activity of synovitis in 11 joints and tenosynovitis in 8 tendons/tendon compartments in the same hand by using power Doppler (PD) ultrasound with a semiquantitative score (0–3). <h3>Results</h3> Study patients were predominated by women (78.9%) with a mean age of 58.4 (SD 14.6) years and a median disease duration of 24 (IQR 8–63.75) months. Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) had been positive in 84.2% and 77.6%, respectively. For synovitis, swollen/tender joint counts more strongly correlated with total PD scores (ρ=0.379–0.561, p≤0.001) than did any parameters of morning stiffness (ρ=0.217–0.314, p=0.006–0.021) (Table 1). For tenosynovitis, however, the severity on awakening and the improvement of morning stiffness more strongly correlated with total PD scores (ρ=0.503–0.561, p&lt;0.001) than did swollen/tender joint counts (ρ=0.276–0.388, p=0.001–0.016) (Table 1). Multivariate analyses identified the severity on awakening and the improvement but not the duration of morning stiffness as factors that independently associate with the total tenosynovial PD score. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Our data demonstrate a pathophysiological link between morning stiffness and tenosynovitis and also give an insight into the optimal measurement of morning stiffness. Our data support an independent value of evaluating morning stiffness in the management of RA. <h3>References</h3> Aletaha D, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1580–8. van der Heijde DM, et al. Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score. Ann Rheum Dis. 1990;49:916–20. Felson DT, et al. American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:404–13. <h3>Disclosure of Interest</h3> None declared