Effect of a Cerebral Protection Device on Brain Lesions Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
Authors: Stephan Haussig, Norman Mangner, Michael G. Dwyer, Lukas Lehmkuhl, Christian Lücke, Felix Woitek, David M. Holzhey, Friedrich W Mohr, Matthias Gutberlet, Robert Zivadinov, Gerhard Schuler, Axel Linke
Journal: JAMA (2016)

<h3>Importance</h3> Stroke remains a major predictor of mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Cerebral protection devices might reduce brain injury as determined by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI). <h3>Objective</h3> To determine the effect of a cerebral protection device on the number and volume of cerebral lesions in patients undergoing TAVI. <h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3> Investigator-initiated, single center, blinded, randomized clinical trial in higher-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI at the University of Leipzig Heart Center. Brain MRI was performed at baseline, 2 days, and 7 days after TAVI. Between April 2013 and June 2014, patients were randomly assigned to undergo TAVI with a cerebral protection device (filter group) or without a cerebral protection device (control group). The last 1-month follow-up occurred in July 2014. <h3>Interventions</h3> TAVI with or without a cerebral protection device (filter system). <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> The primary end point was the numerical difference in new positive postprocedure DWMRI brain lesions at 2 days after TAVI in potentially protected territories. The first hierarchical secondary outcome was the difference in volume of new lesions after TAVI in potentially protected territories. <h3>Results</h3> Among the 100 enrolled patients, mean (SD) age was 80.0 (5.1) years in the filter group (n = 50) and 79.1 (4.1) years in the control group (n = 50), and the mean (SD) procedural risk scores (logistic EuroScores) were 16.4% (10.0%) in the filter group and 14.5% (8.7%) in the control group. For the primary end point, the number of new lesions was lower in the filter group, 4.00 (interquartile range [IQR], 3.00-7.25) vs 10.00 (IQR, 6.75-17.00) in the control group (difference, 5.00 [IQR, 2.00-8.00];<i>P</i> &lt; .001). For the first hierarchical secondary end point, new lesion volume after TAVI was lower in the filter group (242 mm<sup>3</sup>[95% CI, 159-353]) vs in the control group (527 mm<sup>3</sup>[95% CI, 364-830]) (difference, 234 mm<sup>3</sup>[95% CI, 91-406];<i>P</i> = .001). Considering adverse events, 1 patient in the control group died prior to the 30-day visit. Life-threatening hemorrhages occurred in 1 patient in the filter group and 1 in the control group. Major vascular complications occurred in 5 patients in the filter group and 6 patients in the control group. One patient in the filter group and 5 in the control group had acute kidney injury, and 3 patients in the filter group had a thoracotomy. <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> Among patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI, the use of a cerebral protection device reduced the frequency of ischemic cerebral lesions in potentially protected regions. Larger studies are needed to assess the effect of cerebral protection device use on neurological and cognitive function after TAVI and to devise methods that will provide more complete coverage of the brain to prevent new lesions. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01833052