Abstract 1678: European ancestry and ovarian cancer: Testing for their association using case control data
Authors: Paola Raska, Edwin S. Iversen, Ann Chen, Zhihua Chen, Brooke L. Fridley, Jennifer Permuth-Wey, Ya-Yu Tsai, Robert A. Vierkant, Ellen L. Goode, Harvey Risch, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Thomas A. Sellers, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal: Cancer Research (2012)

Abstract Population stratification in case-control studies can result from differences in ancestral make-up between cases and controls due to sampling variation. Ancestry is therefore routinely estimated and controlled for in these studies. Although less common, it is also possible for ancestry to truly be associated to the disease of interest. Controlling for ancestry can then compromise the power to detect variants that underlie both ancestry and disease. Using data from a multi-center case-control study of epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) among women of European-American ethnicity in which case-control samples were drawn from four geographically distinct North-American sites, we developed a three-step method to investigate whether the stratification observed across the four sites is due to chance or to a non-spurious association between European ancestry and OC. First, we collapsed genome-wide data into two principal components (PCs) that represent the major axes of European ancestral variation, which correspond to north-south and to west-east geographical clines. Next, we determined the discriminant function based on these two PCs that best separates cases and controls for each individual study site and we used the largest angle between the four discriminant function vectors as a measure of similarity ranging from 0 degrees, where all four vectors are exactly the same, to 180 degrees where two of the vectors face exactly opposite directions. If stratification is due to sampling, it is unlikely that the four sites will present similar discriminant functions by chance alone. We then gauged significance of similarity by permuting the case control status across individuals within each site and recalculating the maximum angle between the discriminant function vectors, thus obtaining a null distribution for the statistic. We found that all four sites present the greatest separation between cases and controls on the west-east axis of ancestral variation, with a higher proportion of ovarian cancer cases presenting western ancestry. The largest angle between the four discriminant function vectors observed was of 36.5 degrees. Permutation testing showed this level of similarity between the functions to have a p-value &amp;lt; 0.01 and suggests that OC risk is somehow tied to European ancestry. It remains to be seen whether shared culture or other exposures such as parity or oral contraceptive use explain this connection or whether genetic variants underlie it and are potentially being missed due to routine ancestry control in association testing. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1678. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-1678