Decades after the cooperative study: A re‐examination of systemic blood pressure in sickle cell disease
Authors: Payal C. Desai, Allison M. Deal, Julia E. Brittain, Susan Jones, Alan Hinderliter, Kenneth I. Ataga
Journal: American Journal of Hematology (2012)

Previous studies report lower systemic blood pressures in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) than in appropriate controls. The etiology of the lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) remains uncertain. Blood pressure measurements from patients followed at our center (UNC cohort) were compared with values obtained from the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease (CSSCD) and healthy control subjects. Associations of SBP and DBP with clinical and laboratory covariates were performed in the UNC cohort. Patients in the UNC cohort were significantly older and had a higher BMI than those in the CSSCD (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in the SBP and DBP between SCD patients in the UNC cohort and control subjects. In the SS/SD/Sβ0 thalassemia group, SBP was higher in the UNC cohort than in the CSSCD (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, significant correlations were noted between SBP and age, BMI, history of hypertension, and absolute neutrophil count. Compared with historic controls, SBP was significantly higher in our SCD patient cohort. There was no difference when blood pressure was compared between our patient cohort and control subjects. Age, BMI, and neutrophil count may contribute to the modulation of SBP in SCD. Multiple studies have reported that patients with SCD have lower systemic blood pressures when compared with age-, sex-, and race-matched controls [1-4]. This was confirmed by the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease (CSSCD), a natural history study of SCD in the United States [4]. With the recent advances in the care of patients with SCD, we compared systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) measurements in a patient cohort followed at our clinical center with values obtained in the CSSCD and from healthy, control subjects. Furthermore, we evaluated the association of SBP and DBP with clinical and laboratory variables in our patient cohort. Blood pressure measurements were obtained in 156 SCD patients in the UNC cohort and 1,232 patients in the CSSCD cohort. Patients in the UNC cohort were older and had a higher BMI than patients in the CSSCD cohort (Table I). The UNC cohort also had a significantly higher proportion of patients with a diagnosis of hypertension and patients on antihypertensive medications. Patients in the UNC and CSSCD cohorts were categorized into two groups based on presumed disease severity—SS/SD/Sβ0 thalassemia and SC/Sβ+ thalassemia, without consideration of alpha and delta thalassemia status. There were 129 patients in the SS/SD/Sβ0 thalassemia group (83%) and 27 patients in the SC/Sβ+ thalassemia group (17%) in the UNC cohort, with 899 patients in the SS/SD/Sβ0 thalassemia group (73%) and 333 patients in the SC/Sβ+ thalassemia group (27%) in the CSSCD cohort. The SBP in the SS/SD/Sβ0 thalassemia group was significantly higher in the UNC cohort than in the CSSCD cohort (122 ± 15 mmHg vs. 113 ± 14.5 mmHg, P < 0.0001), but there was no difference in the DBP when both cohorts were compared (69 ± 10.5 mmHg vs. 69 ± 10.5 mmHg; P = 0.8). Similarly, in the SC/Sβ+ thalassemia group, the SBP was significantly higher in the UNC cohort (131 ± 12 mmHg vs. 116 ± 15.5 mmHg; P < 0.0001), but no difference was observed when the DBP in both cohorts were compared. When all the SCD patients were stratified by age, the SBP in the UNC cohort was higher in male patients in the 35–44-year age group and female patients in the 18–24-year, 25–34-year and 35–44-year age groups compared with the CSSCD cohort (Supporting Information Figure S1; Table I). We compared the SBP and DBP in SCD patients in the UNC cohort with values from 24 healthy, African-American control subjects without SCD (genotype-AA; median age: 37 years [IQR: 26, 49 years]; BMI: 30.5 [IQR: 25.6, 36.7]). No significant differences were observed in the SBP or DBP when both groups were compared. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the SBP and DBP when patients in the SS/SD/Sβ0 group were compared with healthy controls. However, patients in the SC/Sβ+ group had significantly higher SBP when compared with healthy controls (130.9 ± 12.1 mmHg vs. 120.9 ± 11.3 mmHg, P = 0.01), although no difference was observed in the DBP when both groups were compared. Significant correlations were observed between SBP and age (ρ = 0.37, P < 0.0001) and BMI (ρ = 0.41, P < 0.0001; Table II) in the UNC cohort. Patients with a history of hypertension as well as those on antihypertensive therapy had significantly higher SBP than those without such history or therapy. Modest correlations were observed between SBP and white blood cell count, hemoglobin, reticulocyte count, lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, and placenta growth factor (PIGF; Table III). There were significant correlations between DBP and age and BMI. Modest correlations were also observed between DBP and hemoglobin, platelet count, reticulocyte count, total bilirubin, and indirect bilirubin. There were no significant associations between the evaluated SCD-related clinical complications and either SBP or DBP. After controlling for other covariates, SBP was significantly associated with age (estimate: 0.30, P = 0.0026), BMI (estimate: 0.76, P < 0.0001), prior diagnosis of hypertension (estimate: 6.48, P = 0.027), absolute neutrophil count (estimate: −1.18, P = 0.023), but not with lactate dehydrogenase (estimate: 0.0017, P = 0.49) or hemoglobin (estimate: 1.01, P = 0.14). This means that we expect an increase in SBP by 0.30 mmHg for every 1 year increase in age; an increase in SBP by 0.76 mmHg for every 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI; and a decrease in SBP by 1.18 mmHg for every 1 × 109/L increase in absolute neutrophil count. For a binary response such as prior diagnosis of hypertension, the estimated value of 6.48 indicates that having a history of hypertension is predicted to result in an increase in SBP of 6.48 mmHg when compared with no history of hypertension. Similarly, after controlling for other covariates, DBP was significantly associated with age (estimate: 0.25, P = 0.0004), hemoglobin (estimate: 1.71, P = 0.0021), history of smoking (estimate: −4.96, P = 0.0074), but not with lactate dehydrogenase (estimate: −0.00096, P = 0.62). Despite reported lower systemic blood pressures, patients with higher SBP relative to the SCD population appear to be at higher risk for stroke [4, 5], echocardiography-defined pulmonary hypertension [6], albuminuria [7, 8], and increased mortality [4]. Given the risk of clinical complications despite the apparent lower blood pressures than those obtained in control populations, it is uncertain whether the usual recommendations for the diagnosis of hypertension apply to patients with SCD. We found a significantly higher SBP in SCD patients followed at our center than was observed in the CSSCD. Furthermore, there were no significant differences when the SBP and DBP in SCD patients followed at our center were compared with healthy, control subjects. This finding is similar to that by Thompson and colleagues which showed no difference in the SBP between a cohort of SCD patients and healthy controls in Jamaica [8]. Consistent with a previous report [4], we found an association between SBP and both age and BMI. While patients in the UNC cohort were significantly older than those in the CSSCD, SBP, and DBP values in the UNC cohort were higher when specific age groups were compared, suggesting that age is not the primary reason for the blood pressure differences in both patient cohorts. With the known association between weight and systemic blood pressure [9], the higher BMI in the UNC cohort may contribute to their higher blood pressure values when compared with patients in the CSSCD. Although it has been suggested that lower systemic blood pressures in SCD may be a result of higher urinary sodium loss due to hyposthenuria [3, 4], intravenous salt loading had no effect on blood pressure [10]. Furthermore, individuals with sickle cell trait, who also exhibit hyposthenuria, do not have lower blood pressures than age- and race-matched controls [11]. There are conflicting reports on the association of anemia with systemic blood pressure in SCD [3, 4, 12]. We observed modest associations between markers of hemolysis and both SBP and DBP on univariate analysis, but only hemoglobin remained significantly associated with DBP on multivariate analysis, suggesting that hemolysis may not play a substantial role in blood pressure modulation in SCD. The inverse correlation between SBP and PlGF on univariate analysis suggests that PlGF may play a role in the regulation of blood pressure in SCD. This angiogenic growth factor is higher in SCD patients than in control subjects [13]. As in pre-eclampsia [14], PlGF may contribute to the modulation of systemic blood pressure in SCD. Depletion of neutrophils in healthy mice reduces SBP and produces an impairment of vascular constriction studied ex vivo [15]. This effect was attributed to neutrophil suppression of interferon-mediated inducible nitric oxide synthase expression. The reason for the contradictory finding in SCD patients in our study is uncertain. SCD is referred to as a chronic inflammatory state [16] and patients exhibit elevated leukocyte counts and abnormal activation of various cellular elements [17] even in the non-crisis, "steady state." Leukocytosis is also a risk factor for multiple complications, including acute chest syndrome [18] hemorrhagic stroke [5], vaso-occlusive crises [19], and increased mortality [20]. Our study suggests that the inflammatory state, by possibly increasing the rate of complications and disease severity, may produce lower blood pressures in patients with SCD. This study was not primarily designed to evaluate systemic blood pressure in SCD. Blood pressure measurement was performed using different techniques in our patient cohort and the CSSCD. Our patients were recruited from a specialty clinic at a tertiary care medical center, and may not represent all patients with SCD. As with all cross-sectional studies, this analysis demonstrates associations, but cannot prove causation. In conclusion, patients with SCD in our cohort have significantly higher systemic blood pressures when compared with a historical cohort. The blood pressures of our patient cohort are not significantly different when compared with control subjects. SBP is associated with age, BMI, history of hypertension and inversely associated with absolute neutrophil count. The study subjects represent a cohort of patients followed at the Adult Sickle Cell Clinic at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (UNC cohort). Data were obtained as part of a study to investigate the pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension in SCD [21]. Patients were assessed while in the non-crisis, "steady state"; had not experienced an episode of acute chest syndrome in the 4 weeks preceding enrollment; and had no clinical evidence of congestive heart failure. The healthy control subjects had no known medical conditions, were not taking any medications, and were recruited by advertisement. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at UNC, Chapel Hill and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The presence or history of SCD-related clinical complications, systemic hypertension as well as ongoing use of antihypertensive medications was ascertained at the time of evaluation, combined with a detailed review of the medical records. Acute pain episodes (or pain crises), acute chest syndrome, stroke, and other SCD-related complications were defined using standard definitions [5, 22, 23]. Tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity was measured by Doppler echocardiography as described earlier [24]. Height, weight, blood pressure, and laboratory studies in SCD patients and healthy control subjects were measured during the course of a single visit to the Clinical and Translational Research Center. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight/height2, in units of kg/m2. Seated blood pressure was measured with an automated device (GE Dinamap Carescape V100, Frelburg, Germany [25]; GE Dinamap Procare400, Frelburg, Germany [25, 26]; Critikon Dinamap 8100T, Tampa, FL; Welch-Allyn 53NT0, Meaverton, OR) following a minimum of 10 min of rest. Quantification of human soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN), soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN), and PlGF (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) was accomplished using commercially available ELISA kits. Samples were assayed in duplicate and according to manufacturer's instructions. Routine blood and urine studies were performed by the McClendon Clinical Laboratory at UNC Hospitals. The CSSCD was a prospective, natural history study in SCD that enrolled patients at 23 clinical centers in the United States from 1978 to 1988 (Phase 1) [27]. Blood pressure measurements, clinical data, and laboratory data were collected on all patients older than 2-years during their initial visit and not during acute painful episodes. Single blood pressure measurements were obtained in the sitting position, following at least 5 min of rest, using mercury sphygmomanometers. The systolic and diastolic pressures were reported as the first and fifth Korotkoff sounds, respectively [4]. Hemoglobin analysis was performed at the Centers for Disease Control and the genotypes included in the analysis were SS, Sβ0, SSα, Sβ0α, Sβ0δ, SC, Sβ+, and other sickle hemoglobinopathies. Acute chest syndrome included only patients with a history of pneumonia. We present results on patients older than 18-years who were on the full protocol and had baseline SBP and DBP measurements. Subjects with missing blood pressure data were excluded from the analyses. Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests were used to compare continuous variables in the UNC cohort to the CSSCD cohort. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact tests. Using only the UNC cohort, the association of 25 clinical and laboratory variables with both SBP and DBP was explored using Spearman's correlation coefficients for continuous variables and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests for categorical variables. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Reported P-values are considered "nominal" and are for individual tests, unadjusted for multiple comparisons because of the exploratory nature of this study. For the UNC cohort, based on available sample size (N ≥ 140), multivariable analyses were performed using multiple regression to assess the associations between clinical and laboratory variables that were associated with SBP and DBP in univariate analyses (P < 0.15). Backward elimination using F statistics was used to select the best model. Given the importance of lactate dehydrogenase, this variable was added to both models since it was not selected. Similarly, hemoglobin was added to the SBP model. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS statistical software, version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). We thank Mark Gladwin, MD for providing us with the CSSCD dataset and Melissa Caughey, MPH for help with the echocardiographic studies. Support for this work was also provided by an award from the North Carolina State Sickle Cell Program. We also acknowledge support from the Clinical and Translational Research Center at UNC, Chapel Hill (UL1RR025747). Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Payal C. Desai*, Allison M. Deal , Julia E. Brittain , Susan Jones*, Alan Hinderliter§, Kenneth I. Ataga*, * Division of Hematology/Oncology, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, § Division of Cardiology, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.