Less Is More: A Step in the Right Direction for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Implementation
Authors: C. M. Wheeler
Journal: JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (2011)

Although immunization with two highly efficacious human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines holds great promise for reducing the global burden of HPV-related cancers, the barriers to achieving this goal remain substantial. The cost of HPV vaccination still represents an important obstacle to implementation in many countries but there are several challenges beyond the high cost (1). It has proven difficult to achieve high levels of coverage with all three HPV vaccine doses even in countries with considerable resources. In the United States, where HPV vaccine delivery is principally by primary care physicians, the uptake of the complete three-dose series of HPV vaccine was recently estimated at 32% among 13- to 17-year-old girls (2). This low rate of series completion contrasts with the outstanding successes in Australia and the United Kingdom where school-based HPV vaccine programs have achieved much higher rates of coverage for the third HPV vaccine dose (≥72% and ≥84%, respectively) in the primary target population of 12- and 13-year-old girls (3,4). Functional and routine preventive health-care platforms are nearly nonexistent for adolescents worldwide, therefore school-based immunization programs, where feasible, can provide a solution to achieving high vaccine coverage. Beyond providing a venue for adolescent immunization, evidence from England (4) suggests that school-based HPV vaccine delivery can achieve equity in coverage of 12-year-old girls across deprivation levels of the areas where they live. In the United States, HPV vaccination rates have been strongly and inversely correlated with cervical cancer mortality rates and median income (5). Because cervical screening coverage is inversely associated with poverty and deprivation (6), ensuring equitable HPV vaccine delivery and high coverage in populations that are less likely to have opportunities for cervical screening as adults remains a priority. In addition to problems associated with the cost and organizational challenges of HPV vaccine delivery, there has been little to no information available to examine potential alternative immunization schedules or the efficacy of HPV vaccination with less than the recommended full three-dose series. Sustained immunogenicity and immune memory has been demonstrated following administration of two doses of the hepatitis B vaccine (7), and preliminary data on HPV-specific antibody titers have suggested that two HPV vaccine doses may be equivalent to three (8). However, experts have speculated that a single dose of the HPV vaccine, like other recombinant subunit vaccines, is unlikely to be efficacious. In this issue of the Journal, Kreimer et al. (9) present the first clinical evidence to support the efficacy of fewer than three doses of the bivalent HPV16/18 vaccine. The Costa Rica Vaccine Trial, in which this study was nested, was not specifically designed to measure vaccine efficacy (VE) when less than the complete threedose HPV vaccine series was delivered. Thus, the main reasons that participants in this analysis did not receive three doses were involuntary, including pregnancy and colposcopy referral; few participants refused vaccination. After a median follow-up time of 4.2 years, two doses of the bivalent HPV vaccine demonstrated high VE against incident HPV16 and HPV18 infections that persisted for at least 1 year (VE = 84.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 50.2% to 96.3%), and even a single dose was highly efficacious (VE =100%, 95% CI = 66.5% to 100%). The VE for two and three doses was essentially the same. Importantly, the VE estimates are supported by similar attack rates of incident HPV16 or HPV18 infections that persisted for 1 year among women who received one dose (5.3%), two doses (4.5%), or three doses (4.4%), indicating that they were at similar risk for acquiring HPV infections regardless of the number of doses. Cross-protection against the composite endpoint of incident 1-year persistent infection by HPV31, HPV33, and HPV45 has been reported previously (10) for women who received the standard three-dose regimen of the bivalent HPV vaccine (VE = 41.3%, 95% CI = 18.9% to 57.9%). Kreimer et al. (9), however, show no evidence of vaccine cross-protection in women who received two doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine (VE = 225.9%, 95% CI = 2334% to 61.1%), and although the data are limited, they do suggest that