The removal of cystatin C during continuous venovenous hemofiltration
Authors: Catherine S. C. Bouman, Annick A. N. M. Royakkers, Marcus J. Schultz
Journal: Intensive Care Medicine (2011)

Dear Editor,

With interest we read the paper by Kiers et al. [1] suggesting that cystatin C (CyC) is not a useful parameter for residual renal function during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). We previously found that the sieving coefficient (SC) for the cellulose triacetate membrane for CyC is approximately 0.50 [2]. On the basis of the constant CyC production reported in the literature, we hypothesized that predilution CVVH (2 l/h) is unlikely to influence serum CyC levels, although we did not determine changes in serum CyC [2]. Using the same dose (2 l/h, predilution) but a different membrane (polyacrylonitrile), Kiers et al. report a significant decrease of CyC after 24 h of CVVH in six patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). The authors do not report whether the patients were anuric during CVVH. Several factors may explain the opposite results. First, the cellulose triacetate membrane and the polyacrylonitrile membrane may behave differently in their ability to remove CyC [3]. Unfortunately, Kiers et al. did not measure CyC in the ultrafiltrate, and thus we are not informed on the SC. Second, it is possible that the patients in the study by Kiers et al. had recovering renal function during CVVH, although this is not very likely. Finally, the assumption that the generation rate of CyC in critically ill and non-critically ill patients is comparable may be wrong. To date, only few circumstances have been identified that have an impact on the production of CyC; nevertheless, this was never studied in critically ill patients [4]. We performed a small pilot study in six consecutive patients in order to determine the removal of CyC during CVVH and its effect on serum CyC levels. Patients were included if filter-down time was no longer than 2 h. We applied postdilution CVVH (35 ml/kg/h) and used either a polysulfone membrane (AV 600; Fresenius, Oberursel, Germany) or a cellulose triacetate membrane (UF 205; Nipro Europe, Zaventem, Belgium). Serum CyC decreased after the initiation of CVVH both in oligo-anuric and non-oliguric patients (Fig. 1). In the non-oliguric patients CyC levels increased after cessation of CVVH, suggesting that CVVH played an important role in the removal of CyC. When corrected for possible incomplete mixing by using the SC of urea, which should be 1 by definition, we found an SC of 0.49 ± 0.04 for the cellulose triacetate membrane and 0.45 ± 12 for the polysulfone membrane (p = 1.00). The CVVH dose in the present study was higher than in our earlier study and this may account for the decrease of CyC. Another possibility is that contrary to what we proposed earlier, CyC production is reduced in critically ill patients. The present pilot study and the study by Kiers et al. are limited by the small number of patients. Both studies, however, reach the same conclusion suggesting that during CVVH serum CyC is of little value in monitoring residual renal function, because CVVH removes CyC and decreases its serum levels.



Fig. 1

Time course of serum cystatin C and serum creatinine during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). Curves represent individual patients. Open circles, cellulose triacetate membrane, closed circles polysulfone membrane. Left panel oligo-anuric patients. ...