Anxiety Disorders: Efficient Screening Is the First Step in Improving Outcomes
Authors: Wayne Katon, Peter Roy-Byrne
Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine (2007)

Editorials6 March 2007Anxiety Disorders: Efficient Screening Is the First Step in Improving OutcomesFREEWayne Katon, MD and Peter Roy-Byrne, MDWayne Katon, MDFrom University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. and Peter Roy-Byrne, MDFrom University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00011 SectionsAboutVisual AbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Anxiety disorders have been the neglected stepchild of primary care–based mental health care. Compared with the extensive research in primary care on the adverse effects of depression on somatic symptom burden, decrements in function, and medical utilization and costs (1, 2), far less research has been completed on anxiety disorders. Yet, the National Comorbidity Survey (3) has shown that anxiety disorders are the most frequent disorders in the general population and are associated with substantial social and vocational impairment. Primary care patients with anxiety disorders are high users of primary care services and have many medically unexplained symptoms (that is, chest pain and rapid heart rate), clinically significant decrements in function, and high medical costs (1, 4–6). They also have high levels of psychiatric comorbidity, particularly major depression. Meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV), criteria for 1 or more anxiety disorder markedly increases the risk for major depression over the following year (7). Anxiety disorders are also associated with adverse health behaviors, such as smoking and sedentary lifestyle (8, 9), which may contribute to the high levels of medical comorbidity found in adults with anxiety disorders.In this issue, Kroenke and colleagues describe 4 important findings (10) about anxiety disorders in primary care: 1) the high prevalence (19.5%) of the 4 most common anxiety disorders in primary care (generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]); 2) the association of these 4 disorders with high levels of comorbid depression, somatic symptom burden, and functional impairment, as well as high medical utilization; 3) 2 brief screening questionnaires (Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD]-2 and GAD-7) can efficiently screen for all 4 disorders; and 4) more than 40% of patients with an anxiety disorder reported that they were not receiving any current mental health treatment.Unlike the extensive research on the use of depression scales in primary care, far fewer reports have focused on the development of screening scales for anxiety. Kroenke and colleagues' paper shows that 2 new screening questionnaires, the GAD-2 and the longer GAD-7, not only perform well (as measured by receiver-operating characteristic [ROC] curve analysis) for detecting generalized anxiety disorder, but also performed almost as well for detecting panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and PTSD (10). This result is important because using a different screening test for each disorder would be inefficient and might discourage screening in primary care, especially given the extensive time that is already required for screening for multiple medical disorders. However, we wonder whether the responses to the questionnaire may only reflect anxiety. Given the relatively high depression scores in Kroenke and colleagues' study population, the high predictive validity of the GAD-7 may reflect a high level of nonspecific emotional distress rather than something specifically unique about anxiety. Comparing the ROC curves for depression screening measures, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 or PHQ-2 (11), with the ROC curve for GAD-7 would be a first step in testing this hypothesis.Screening for anxiety disorders is a necessary first step, but the evidence suggests that making a diagnosis is not sufficient to improve the quality of mental health care and outcomes among primary care patients with anxiety disorders (12). Studies have shown that primary care patients who are accurately diagnosed with anxiety disorders have important gaps in the mental health care that they receive, including poor adherence to psychoactive medications, poor follow-up by primary care physicians, and infrequent exposure to evidence-based psychotherapies (such as cognitive–behavioral therapy) (13). These findings, together with the high prevalence of anxiety disorders, indicate a serious failure in the management of anxiety in the primary care setting.Research on primary care–based care of depression suggests that changing the system for anxiety disorders may help to close the gap. These studies have shown that system-of-care changes that linked depression screening programs to exposure to evidence-based depression treatments had the largest effect on the quality of care for depression and improvement in depression outcomes (14). According to very strong evidence, quality of care and outcomes improve when screening is coupled with multimodel intervention programs, such as collaborative care (15, 16).Collaborative care models are an important element in improving the quality of mental health care. They use allied health professionals, such as nurses, to support primary care physicians. These care managers provide patient education about depression, closely follow patients, track adverse effects of care, monitor adherence and depression outcomes (with standard depression scales, such as the PHQ-9) (11), and facilitate return visits with the primary care physician if depression is not improving (15). In the most successful collaborative care programs, a psychiatrist supervises the care manager and recommends medication adjustments that the allied health professional communicates to the primary care physician.These collaborative care models are very effective in improving depression care. A recent meta-analysis reviewed 37 trials that compared the effect of collaborative care models for depression with that of usual primary care (16). The meta-analysis showed 2-fold increases in adherence to antidepressants and improvements in depression outcomes that lasted for 2 to 5 years (16). Three recent studies that tested the effectiveness of collaborative care models for patients with generalized anxiety disorder or panic disorder also found statistically significant improvements in the quality of care and anxiety outcomes compared with usual care (17–19).A potentially key element of the most successful collaborative care programs is patient self-activation, which may be particularly important for patients with anxiety because they actively avoid specific anxiety-provoking situations and behaviors. Self-activation is an important element in overcoming avoidance, which is necessary for anxiety syndromes to fully remit. As Kroenke and colleagues note, this aspect of anxiety disorders also suggests that cognitive–behavioral treatments may be particularly important for patients with anxiety.Kroenke and colleagues have performed a large, descriptive study that shines a spotlight on a largely neglected disorder. We point out 2 minor concerns. The authors show that people with any of the 4 anxiety disorders have poorer function than people without these disorders. In the analysis that led to their conclusion, the authors did not make statistical adjustments to control for the higher prevalence of comorbid major depression and medical disorders in patients with anxiety disorders versus those without. However, other researchers have found that anxiety disorders are associated with statistically significant decrements in function after statistically controlling for depression and medical comorbidity (6). A second concern is the method for forming the study sample. The authors recruited the sample from patients attending clinic and did not select the patients randomly, which may explain the slightly higher rates of anxiety disorders compared with those of other recent studies.Accurate recognition of anxiety disorders in primary care is the first step in providing effective treatment and potentially preventing development of major depression and social and vocational impairment. Kroenke and colleagues have developed and validated a brief anxiety questionnaire that efficiently screens for the 4 most common anxiety disorders. Hopefully, this contribution will help stimulate the continued development of effective primary care–based models to treat these highly prevalent disorders.References1. Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin E, Lipscomb P, Russo J, Wagner E, et al. Distressed high utilizers of medical care. DSM-III-R diagnoses and treatment needs. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1990;12:355-62. [PMID: 2245919] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Wells KB, Stewart A, Hays RD, Burnam MA, Rogers W, Daniels M, et al. The functioning and well-being of depressed patients. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1989;262:914-9. [PMID: 2754791] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:593-602. [PMID: 15939837] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Katon W. Panic disorder and somatization. Review of 55 cases. Am J Med. 1984;77:101-6. [PMID: 6377887] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Roy-Byrne PP, Katon W. Generalized anxiety disorder in primary care: the precursor/modifier pathway to increased health care utilization. J Clin Psychiatry. 1997;58 Suppl 3:34-8; discussion 39-40. [PMID: 9133491] Google Scholar6. Stein MB, Roy-Byrne PP, Craske MG, Bystritsky A, Sullivan G, Pyne JM, et al. Functional impact and health utility of anxiety disorders in primary care outpatients. Med Care. 2005;43:1164-70. [PMID: 16299426] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Kessler RC, Nelson CB, McGonagle KA, Liu J, Swartz M, Blazer DG. Comorbidity of DSM-III-R major depressive disorder in the general population: results from the US National Comorbidity Survey. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1996;:17-30. [PMID: 8864145] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Bonnet F, Irving K, Terra JL, Nony P, Berthezène F, Moulin P. Anxiety and depression are associated with unhealthy lifestyle in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2005;178:339-44. [PMID: 15694943] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. John U, Meyer C, Rumpf HJ, Hapke U. Smoking, nicotine dependence and psychiatric comorbidity—a population-based study including smoking cessation after three years. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;76:287-95. [PMID: 15561479] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Monahan PO, Löwe B. Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:317-25. LinkGoogle Scholar11. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606-13. [PMID: 11556941] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. Mathias SD, Fifer SK, Mazonson PD, Lubeck DP, Buesching DP, Patrick DL. Necessary but not sufficient: the effect of screening and feedback on outcomes of primary care patients with untreated anxiety. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:606-15. [PMID: 7853069] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. Stein MB, Sherbourne CD, Craske MG, Means-Christensen A, Bystritsky A, Katon W, et al. Quality of care for primary care patients with anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:2230-7. [PMID: 15569894] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14. Pignone MP, Gaynes BN, Rushton JL, Burchell CM, Orleans CT, Mulrow CD, et al. Screening for depression in adults: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:765-76. [PMID: 12020146] LinkGoogle Scholar15. Katon W, Unützer J. Collaborative care models for depression: time to move from evidence to practice [Editorial]. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2304-6. [PMID: 17130381] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16. Gilbody S, Bower P, Fletcher J, Richards D, Sutton AJ. Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2314-21. [PMID: 17130383] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17. Rollman BL, Belnap BH, Mazumdar S, Houck PR, Zhu F, Gardner W, et al. A randomized trial to improve the quality of treatment for panic and generalized anxiety disorders in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:1332-41. [PMID: 16330721] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18. Roy-Byrne PP, Katon W, Cowley DS, Russo J. A randomized effectiveness trial of collaborative care for patients with panic disorder in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:869-76. [PMID: 11545671] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19. Roy-Byrne PP, Craske MG, Stein MB, Sullivan G, Bystritsky A, Katon W, et al. A randomized effectiveness trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy and medication for primary care panic disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:290-8. [PMID: 15753242] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Comments0 CommentsSign In to Submit A Comment Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: From University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.Disclosures: Consultancies: W. Katon (Eli Lilly Inc.), P. Roy-Byrne (Alza, Cephalon, GlaxoSmithKline, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly Inc., Jannsen Research Foundation, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Inc., Pharmacia Corp., Solvay, Roche, Wyeth-Ayerst); Honoraria: W. Katon (Eli Lilly Inc., Pfizer Inc., Forest Pharmaceuticals, Wyeth), P. Roy-Byrne (GlaxoSmithKline, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., Pharmacia Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst); Grants received: P. Roy-Byrne (GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer Inc., Forest Pharmaceuticals).Corresponding Author: Wayne Katon, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356560, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195-6560; e-mail, [email protected]washington.edu.Current Author Addresses: Dr. Katon: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356560, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195-6560.Dr. Roy-Byrne: Harborview Medical Center, 2HH7 Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoAnxiety Disorders in Primary Care: Prevalence, Impairment, Comorbidity, and Detection Kurt Kroenke , Robert L. Spitzer , Janet B.W. Williams , Patrick O. Monahan , and Bernd Löwe Metrics Cited ByA Brief Online and Offline (Paper-and-Pencil) Screening Tool for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The Final Phase in the Development and Validation of the Mental Health Screening Tool for Anxiety Disorders (MHS: A)Generalized Anxiety DisorderJeremy DeMartini, MD, Gayatri Patel, MD, MPH, and Tonya L. Fancher, MD, MPHAccuracy of Anxiety Disorder Not Otherwise Specified Diagnosis in Older VeteransDoes presence of metabolic syndrome impact anxiety and depressive disorder screening results in middle aged and elderly individuals? A population based studyOptimal primary care management of clinical osteoarthritis and joint pain in older people: a mixed-methods programme of systematic reviews, observational and qualitative studies, and randomised controlled trialsThe effects of implementing a point-of-care electronic template to prompt routine anxiety and depression screening in patients consulting for osteoarthritis (the Primary Care Osteoarthritis Trial): A cluster randomised trial in primary careScreening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysisTrait anger but not anxiety predicts incident type 2 diabetes: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)Diagnostic specificity and mental health service utilization among veterans with newly diagnosed anxiety disordersEarly identification of patients with psychological distress: the role of inflammatory bowel disease nursesAssociation between anxiety, health-related quality of life and functional impairment in primary care patients with chronic painRecognizing anxiety disordersPrimary Care PsychologyDelivering Psychiatric Services in Primary-Care SettingRecognition of anxiety disorders by the general practitioner: results from the DASMAP StudyA population study comparing screening performance of prototypes for depression and anxiety with standard scalesPDI-4A: An Augmented Provisional Screening Instrument Assessing 5 Additional Common Anxiety-Related Diagnoses in Adult Primary Care PatientsA 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: Validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general populationAssessing and Diagnosing Posttraumatic Stress DisorderValidation and Standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the General Population 6 March 2007Volume 146, Issue 5Page: 390-392KeywordsAnxietyAnxiety disordersDepressionHealth care qualityPatientsPsychiatry and mental healthQuestionnaires ePublished: 6 March 2007 Issue Published: 6 March 2007 CopyrightCopyright © 2007 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF DownloadLoading ...