Immunity to Schistosomes: Advances and Prospects
Authors: JOHN R. DAVID
Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine (1979)

Editorials1 October 1979Immunity to Schistosomes: Advances and ProspectsJOHN R. DAVID, M.D., ANTHONY E. BUTTERWORTH, PH.D.JOHN R. DAVID, M.D.Search for more papers by this author, ANTHONY E. BUTTERWORTH, PH.D.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-91-4-641 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ExcerptUntil recently, immunology has had relatively little to offer for the control of schistosomiasis, a disease that already affects more than 200 million people and which is, because of the widespread development of irrigation schemes, an increasing public health problem. On the one hand conventional parasitologic diagnostic techniques have proved more sensitive and specific than immunologic methods using crude parasite antigens. On the other hand, no vaccines are available, and control has rested largely on standard methods of chemotherapy, mollusciciding, and water engineering and sanitation. In both diagnosis and control, there is now room for new immunologic approaches.The problems...References1. BOUT D, DUGIMONT J, FARAG H, and CAPRON A Immunodiagnosis of human parasitic diseases by ELISA. In: FELDMANN G, ed. First International Symposium on Immunoenzymatic Techniques, INSERM Symposium No. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company; 1976:175-82. Google Scholar2. KOHLER G and MILSTEIN C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature. 1975;256:495-7. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. TAYLOR M, JAMES E, NELSON G, BICKLE Q, DUNNE D, and WEBBE G. Immunisation of sheep against Schistosoma mattheei using either irradiated cercariae or irradiated schistosomula. J Helminthol. 1976;50:1-9. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. SMITHERS S and TERRY R. Immunity in schistosomiasis. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1969;160:826-40. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. GOLDRING O, CLEGG J, SMITHERS S, and TERRY R. Acquisition of human blood group antigens by Schistosoma mansoni. Clin Exp Immunol. 1976;26:181-7. MedlineGoogle Scholar6. SHER A, HALL B, and VADAS M. Acquisition of murine major histocompatibility complex gene products by schistosmula of Schistosoma mansoni. J Exp Med. 1978;148:46-57. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. DEAN D. Decreased binding of cytotoxic antibody by developing Schistosoma mansoni: evidence for a surface change independent of host antigen absorption and membrane turnover. J Parasitol. 1977;63:418-26. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. PHILLIPS S and COLLEY D. Immunologic aspects of host responses to schistosomiasis: resistance, immunopathology, and eosinophil involvement. Prog Allergy. 1978;24:49-182. MedlineGoogle Scholar9. CAPRON A, DESSAINT J, JOSEPH M, ROUSSEAUX R, CAPRON M, and BAZIN H. Interaction between IgE complexes and macrophages in the rat: a new mechanism of macrophage activation. Eur J Immunol. 1977;7:315-22. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. BUTTERWORTH A, DAVID J, and FRANKS D. Antibody-dependent eosinophil-mediated damage to 51Cr-labeled schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni: damage by purified eosinophils. J Exp Med. 1977;145:136-50. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11. VADAS M, DAVID J, BUTTERWORTH A, PISANI N, and SIONGOK T. A new method for the purification of human eosinophils and neutrophils, and a comparison of the ability of these cells to damage schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. J Immunol. 1979;122:1228-36. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. BUTTERWORTH A, WASSOM D, GLEICH G, LOEGERING D, and DAVID J. Damage to schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni induced directly by eosinophil major basic protein. J Immunol. 1979;122:221-9. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. WARREN K, DOMINGO E, and COWAN R. Granuloma formation around schistosome eggs as a manifestation of delayed hypersensitivity. Am J Pathol. 1967;51:735-56. MedlineGoogle Scholar14. ANDRADE Z and WARREN K. Mild prolonged schistosomiasis in mice: alterations in host response with time and the development of portal fibrosis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1964;58:53-7. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15. DOMINGO E and WARREN K. Endogenous desensitization: changing host granulomatous response to schistosome eggs at different stages of infection with Schistosoma mansoni. Am J Pathol. 1968; 52:369-79. MedlineGoogle Scholar16. COLLEY D. Adoptive suppression of granuloma formation. J Exp Med. 1976;143:696-700. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar This content is PDF only. To continue reading please click on the PDF icon. Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: JOHN R. DAVID, M.D.; ANTHONY E. BUTTERWORTH, PH.D.Affiliations: Department of Medicine Robert B. Brigham Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited byDiagnosis and treatment of schistosomiasis in children in the era of intensified controlSchistosomiasis and Renal TransplantationGenito-urinary Schistosomiasis (Bilharziasis). Part 1 1 October 1979Volume 91, Issue 4 Page: 641-643 Keywords Antigens Chemotherapy Diagnostic techniques Immunity Immunology Prevention, policy, and public health Sanitation Schistosomiasis Vaccines ePublished: 1 December 2008 Issue Published: 1 October 1979 PDF downloadLoading ...