Sex, Access, and Excess
Authors: Peter Franks
Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine (1995)

Editorials1 October 1995Sex, Access, and ExcessPeter Franks, MD, Carolyn M. Clancy, MD, and Elizabeth H. Naumburg, MDPeter Franks, MDUniversity of Rochester Rochester, NY 14620; Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Rockville, MD 20852-4908; University of Rochester Rochester, NY 14620|Search for more papers by this author, Carolyn M. Clancy, MDUniversity of Rochester Rochester, NY 14620; Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Rockville, MD 20852-4908; University of Rochester Rochester, NY 14620|Search for more papers by this author, and Elizabeth H. Naumburg, MDUniversity of Rochester Rochester, NY 14620; Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Rockville, MD 20852-4908; University of Rochester Rochester, NY 14620|Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-123-7-199510010-00012 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Studies documenting sex differences in the use of invasive technological services are frequently cited as evidence that women receive lower-quality care than men. However, closer examination of sex differences in health care use shows an apparent inconsistency: Although women receive fewer invasive technological services than men, they use more primary care services and live longer. In addition, most literature on sex differences has focused on differences in the use of technological services; scant attention has been given to the patient's perspective of quality of care. We believe that the debate on sex bias has obscured the importance of differences between ...References1. Adams PF, Benson V. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1991. Vital Health Stat [10]. 1992:1-232. Google Scholar2. Verbrugge LM, Steiner RP. Physician treatment of men and women patients: sex bias or appropriate care? Med Care. 1981; 19:609-32. Google Scholar3. Weissman JS, Gatsonis C, Epstein AM. Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA. 1992; 268:2388-94. Google Scholar4. Ballard DJ, Strogatz DS, Wagner EH, Siscovick DS, James SA, Kleinbaum DG, et al. Hypertension control in a rural southern community: medical care process and dropping out. Am J Prev Med. 1988; 4:133-9. Google Scholar5. Starfield B. Primary Care: Concept, Evaluation, and Policy. New York: Oxford University Pr; 1992. Google Scholar6. Meininger JC. Sex differences in factors associated with use of medical care and alternative illness behaviors. Soc Sci Med. 1986; 22:289-92. Google Scholar7. Hall JA, Irish JT, Roter DL, Ehrlich CM, Miller LH. Satisfaction, gender, and communication in medical visits. Med Care. 1994; 32:1216-31. Google Scholar8. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE Jr. Assessing the effects of physician–patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989; 27:S110-27. Google Scholar9. Andersen R, Lion J, Anderson OW. Two Decades of Health Services Research: Social Survey Trends in Use and Expenditures. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger; 1976. Google Scholar10. Friedman GD, Collen MF, Fireman BH. Multiphasic Health Checkup Evaluation: a 16-year follow-up. J Chronic Dis. 1986; 39:453-63. Google Scholar11. Hall JA, Roter DL, Katz NR. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care. 1988; 26:657-75. Google Scholar12. Lerman CE, Brody DS, Caputo GC, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Wolfson HG. Patients' Perceived Involvement in Care Scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990; 5:29-33. Google Scholar13. Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr, Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988; 3:448-57. Google Scholar14. Flaherty J, Richman J. Gender differences in the perception and utilization of social support: theoretical perspectives and an empirical test. Soc Sci Med. 1989; 28:1221-8. Google Scholar15. Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325:221-5. Google Scholar16. McClellan M, McNeil BJ, Newhouse JP. Does more intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly reduce mortality? Analysis using instrumental variables. JAMA. 1994; 272:859-66. Google Scholar17. Bickell NA, Pieper KS, Lee KL, Mark DB, Glower DD, Pryor DB, et al. Referral patterns for coronary artery disease treatment: gender bias or good clinical judgment? Ann Intern Med. 1992; 116:791-7. Google Scholar18. Orencia A, Bailey K, Yawn BP, Kottke TE. Effect of gender on long-term outcome of angina pectoris and myocardial infarction/sudden unexpected death. JAMA. 1993; 269:2392-7. Google Scholar19. Mark DB, Shaw LK, DeLong ER, Califf RM, Pryor DB. Absence of sex bias in the referral of patients for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330:1101-6. Google Scholar20. Wennberg JE. Outcomes research, cost containment, and the fear of health care rationing. N Engl J Med. 1990; 323:1202-4. Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: University of Rochester Rochester, NY 14620; Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Rockville, MD 20852-4908; University of Rochester Rochester, NY 14620|Disclaimer: The views expressed are not necessarily those of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.Corresponding Author: Peter Franks, MD, Primary Care Institute, Highland Hospital, 885 South Avenue, Rochester, NY 14620.Current Author Addresses: Drs. Franks and Naumberg: Primary Care Institute, Highland Hospital, 885 South Avenue, Rochester, NY 14620. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited ByPrescription Opioids and Patient Sex: A National Cross-Sectional StudyChronic obstructive pulmonary disease in African- and European-American women: morbidity, mortality and healthcare utilization in the USAGender Differences in Symptoms and Care Delivery for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseCholesterol treatment with statins: Who is left out and who makes it to goal?Existe-t-il des spécificités chez les femmes atteintes de BPCO ?Gender and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseChronic obstructive pulmonary disease in womenHypertension in Older Urban Native-American Primary Care PatientsGender Bias in the Diagnosis of COPDProcedure-Specific Outcomes Assessment for EsophagogastroduodenoscopyDifferences in clinical communication by genderWomen’s health, chronic disease, and disease management: new words and old music?Sex-based differences in the pharmacological treatment of hypertensionRace and Ethnicity 1 October 1995Volume 123, Issue 7Page: 548-550KeywordsAngiographyCardiac surgeryCommunication in health careCoronary heart diseaseHealth careHospitalizationsLongitudinal studiesMedical servicesPatientsPrimary care Issue Published: 1 October 1995 CopyrightCopyright © 1995 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF DownloadLoading ...