Cardiovascular Risks of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Where We Stand Now
Authors: Axel Finckh, Mark D. Aronson
Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine (2005)

Editorials1 February 2005Cardiovascular Risks of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Where We Stand NowFREEAxel Finckh, MD, MS and Mark D. Aronson, MDAxel Finckh, MD, MSFrom Brigham and Women's Hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. and Mark D. Aronson, MDFrom Brigham and Women's Hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-142-3-200502010-00013 SectionsAboutVisual AbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including nonselective nonaspirin NSAIDs and cyclooxygenase-2 selective (COX-2) inhibitors, are widely used for various arthritides and pain syndromes. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in particular have been an enormous financial success, with more than $5 billion in sales in the United States in 2003 (1). That market took a huge hit recently with the withdrawal of rofecoxib (Vioxx, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey) after the release of the worrisome data on the excessive cardiac morbidity attributed to rofecoxib in a trial attempting to prove that it could reduce the occurrence of colonic adenomas. The nearly simultaneous report by Pfizer, Inc., of the adverse cardiac effects of valdecoxib (Bextra, Pfizer, Inc., New York, New York) after cardiac surgery (1) raised the issue of whether other drugs in the class are safe to use. Patients and clinicians are anxious to know whether cardiotoxicity is a class effect, and thereby applicable to any COX-2 inhibitor, or whether cardiotoxicity is limited to certain drugs in the class. In this issue, Kimmel and colleagues (2) shed some light on this question by examining whether the risk for cardiotoxicity differs among the COX-2 inhibitors celecoxib (Celebrex, Pfizer, Inc.) and rofexocib and nonselective nonaspirin NSAIDs.Traditional nonselective nonaspirin NSAIDs inhibit both isoforms of the COX enzyme, COX-1 and COX-2. Cyclooxygenase catalyzes the conversion of arachadonic acid to prostaglandins, prostacyclin, and thromboxane. The COX-1 enzyme is expressed constitutively in tissues, such as the gastrointestinal mucosa, where it induces mucoprotective prostaglandins, while the COX-2 enzyme expression is inducible, in particular by inflammation. The inhibition of the COX-1–related production of prostaglandins by nonselective nonaspirin NSAIDs increases the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding. The recognition of 2 isoforms of COX soon led to the hypothesis that selective COX-2 inhibitors would have the beneficial properties of nonselective nonaspirin NSAIDs without gastrointestinal toxicity (3). Large clinical trials (4-6) validated this hypothesis and confirmed that COX-2 inhibitors are associated with less gastrointestinal toxicity than nonselective nonaspirin NSAIDs. However, these trials have also raised concerns about the cardiovascular safety of this class of drugs (7).The role of COX-2 inhibition in atherogenesis is complex and is not fully understood. While nonselective nonaspirin NSAIDs and aspirin inhibit the formation of platelet-derived thromboxane and endothelial prostacyclin, COX-2 inhibitors preferentially suppress the vasodilator and platelet inhibitory prostaglandins without blocking the vasoconstrictive and platelet-activating prostaglandins, which could result in a prothrombotic effect. Accelerated atherogenesis of COX-2 inhibitors might be further modulated by renovascular hypertension, inhibition of vascular inflammation, improvement of endothelial function, and changes in artherosclerotic plaque stability (8-10). These effects may differ among structurally distinct COX-2 inhibitors with different levels of COX-1 or COX-2 selectivity (10-12), but evidence for a differential cardiovascular effect in this class is limited.We should not be surprised that toxicity differs among drugs in a class (for example, the biguanides with metformin vs. phenformin and the risk for lactic acidosis). Kimmel and colleagues offer evidence for a differential effect on cardiotoxicity among COX-2 inhibitors (2). They used a case–control design to study patients presenting with a first nonfatal myocardial infarction in several medical centers and hospitals in southeastern Pennsylvania. After discharge, patients and controls were asked about exposure to nonselective nonaspirin NSAIDs, as well as COX-2 inhibitors (including rofecoxib and celecoxib). Kimmel and colleagues found no evidence for a class effect of COX-2 inhibitors for cardiovascular toxicity but demonstrated that rofecoxib use was associated with a statistically significant 2.72 increased odds of myocardial infarction when compared with celecoxib use. While case–control studies are prone to various selection biases, such as recall and nonparticipation bias, these should have applied equally to both rofecoxib and celocoxib, thereby giving credence to the hypothesis that a differential effect on cardiotoxicity is within the COX-2 inhibitor class.The most reliable evidence of cardiovascular toxicity of the COX-2 inhibitors comes from large randomized, double-blind trials. Results of the Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research (VIGOR) study (4) revealed an increased risk for myocardial infarction for patients treated with 50 mg of rofecoxib, whereas similar large trials with celecoxib (5) or lumiracoxib (6) demonstrated no statistically significant differences in cardiovascular end points compared with nonselective nonaspirin NSAIDs. However, these trials were not primarily designed or powered to prove cardiovascular safety as a primary end point; mean follow-up time was rather short (6 to 12 months), and the selected patient samples had a relatively low rate of cardiovascular events. Therefore, the trials of celecoxib or lumiracoxib do not exclude the possibility of increased cardiovascular toxicity with these drugs. Several large observational studies found an increased rate of coronary heart disease with high-dose rofexocib but not with celecoxib (13, 14). Solomon and colleagues (15) reported increased risk for acute myocardial infarction with any dosages of rofecoxib but not celecoxib. Mamdani and colleagues found an increased risk for congestive heart failure with rofecoxib and not with celecoxib (16) but no difference in the risk for myocardial infarction (17), but they did not address dosage and excluded short-term users. Overall, these studies suggest that not all COX-2 inhibitors share the same cardiovascular risk as rofecoxib, but the evidence is currently too limited to exclude the possibility of a COX-2 inhibitor class effect. Furthermore, nonselective nonaspirin NSAIDs might also increase cardiovascular risk (18). The major unanswered question is whether the unopposed COX-2 inhibition or other drug specific mechanisms cause increased cardiovascular risk.What should physicians do at this time if they decide to prescribe a nonaspirin NSAID? Studies with rofecoxib indicate that nonaspirin NSAID–related cardiac toxicity occurs primarily in male patients older than 65 years of age with a history of cardiovascular events or at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor (19). We believe that because 2 separate drugs in the class of COX-2 inhibitors have now been associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity (rofecoxib and valdecoxib), physicians should avoid COX-2 inhibitors as a first-line agent in patients with cardiovascular risk factors and average risk for gastrointestinal toxicity. Although much recent attention has been given to the cardiovascular toxicity of COX-2 inhibitors, serious and occasionally life-threatening gastrointestinal toxicity does occur with both nonselective nonaspirin NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors, although less so with the COX-2 class. In light of the current uncertainty about whether cardiotoxicity is a class effect of COX-2 inhibitors, we suggest using either a nonselective nonaspirin NSAID with a concomitant gastroprotective agent or celecoxib (Celebrex) for patients at high risk for gastrointestinal toxicity. Further study is urgently needed to document the safety of COX-2 inhibitors and nonselective nonaspirin NSAIDs.AddendumSince the original release of this editorial on the Annals Web site, the National Institutes of Health announced that it has suspended a colorectal cancer prevention trial of celecoxib. On the advice of the data safety monitoring board, they stopped the Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib (APC) trial because of an increased risk for fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events with celecoxib (20). According to the data released so far, patients using celecoxib over the long term (average duration ~ 3 years) at high dosages (≥400 mg/d) had a 2.5 to 3.4 times increased risk for cardiovascular events compared with those receiving placebo. While the full data are not yet available, the resemblance to the rofecoxib cancer prevention trial is striking and hints at a class effect related to long-term unopposed COX-2 inhibition. Of note, the difference in cardiovascular safety between placebo and the 2 principal COX-2 inhibitors became apparent only after several years of continuous treatment; this emphasizes the importance of long-term studies to assess drug safety.To underscore the uncertainty that we should have about NSAIDs (selective and nonselective), consider the results of another large long-term trial with celecoxib at 400 mg/d. In this study, designed to investigate the role of NSAIDs in preventing Alzheimer disease (ADAPT, Alzheimer's Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial), the COX-2 inhibitor did not increase cardiovascular risk (21). Surprisingly, in this trial, 440 mg/d of the nonselective nonaspirin NSAID naproxen, which is available over the counter in the United States, was associated with increased cardiovascular risk (21).The cardiovascular data from the APC trial with celecoxib and from ADAPT with naproxen are disturbing because they are inconsistent with most observational studies and other randomized, controlled trials with these drugs, which have not shown increased cardiovascular risk (22, 23). The reasons for these discrepancies must be analyzed and understood before any definitive recommendations can be made for the use of celecoxib and other drugs in this class. Until then, we believe that COX-2 inhibitors, in particular at higher dosages and for longer-term use, should not be a first-line therapy for patients who can tolerate alternative therapies. We reiterate our earlier conclusion that we urgently need further research to document the safety of long-term use of COX-2 inhibitors and nonselective nonaspirin NSAIDs.Axel Finckh, MD, MSBrigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115Mark D. Aronson, MDBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02215References1. Abelson R, Gardiner H. Pfizer warns of risks from its painkiller. The New York Times. 2004:B1. Google Scholar2. Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Reilly M, Jaskowiak J, Kishel L, Chittams J, et al. Patients exposed to rofecoxib and celecoxib have different odds of nonfatal myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:157-64. LinkGoogle Scholar3. Bolten WW. Scientific rationale for specific inhibition of COX-2. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1998;51:2-7. [PMID: 9596548] MedlineGoogle Scholar4. Bombardier C, Laine L, Reicin A, Shapiro D, Burgos-Vargas R, Davis B, et al. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1520-8, 2 p following 1528. [PMID: 11087881] Google Scholar5. Silverstein FE, Faich G, Goldstein JL, Simon LS, Pincus T, Whelton A, et al. Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: A randomized, controlled trial. Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study. JAMA. 2000;284:1247-55. [PMID: 10979111] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Schnitzer TJ, Burmester GR, Mysler E, Hochberg MC, Doherty M, Ehrsam E, et al. Comparison of lumiracoxib with naproxen and ibuprofen in the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET), reduction in ulcer complications: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:665-74. [PMID: 15325831] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Mukherjee D, Nissen SE, Topol EJ. Risk of cardiovascular events associated with selective COX-2 inhibitors. JAMA. 2001;286:954-9. [PMID: 11509060] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Altman R, Luciardi HL, Muntaner J, Del Rio F, Berman SG, Lopez R, et al. Efficacy assessment of meloxicam, a preferential cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation: the Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Unstable Angina Treatment-2 (NUT-2) pilot study. Circulation. 2002;106:191-5. [PMID: 12105157] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Chenevard R, Hürlimann D, Béchir M, Enseleit F, Spieker L, Hermann M, et al. Selective COX-2 inhibition improves endothelial function in coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2003;107:405-9. [PMID: 12551863] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Whelton A, White WB, Bello AE, Puma JA, Fort JG. Effects of celecoxib and rofecoxib on blood pressure and edema in patients > or =65 years of age with systemic hypertension and osteoarthritis. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:959-63. [PMID: 12398962] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11. Hermann M, Camici G, Fratton A, Hurlimann D, Tanner FC, Hellermann JP, et al. Differential effects of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors on endothelial function in salt-induced hypertension. Circulation. 2003;108:2308-11. [PMID: 14597594] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. Solomon DH, Schneeweiss S, Levin R, Avorn J. Relationship between COX-2 specific inhibitors and hypertension. Hypertension. 2004;44:140-5. [PMID: 15226279] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. Ray WA, Stein CM, Daugherty JR, Hall K, Arbogast PG, Griffin MR. COX-2 selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of serious coronary heart disease. Lancet. 2002;360:1071-3. [PMID: 12383990] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14. Graham DJ, Campen DH, Cheetham C, Hui R, Spence M, Ray WA. Risk of acute cardiac events among patients treated with cyclooxygenase-2 selective and non-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [Abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004;13:S287-8. Google Scholar15. Solomon DH, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, Kiyota Y, Levin R, Mogun H, et al. Relationship between selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and acute myocardial infarction in older adults. Circulation. 2004;109:2068-73. [PMID: 15096449] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16. Mamdani M, Juurlink DN, Lee DS, Rochon PA, Kopp A, Naglie G, et al. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors versus non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and congestive heart failure outcomes in elderly patients: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2004;363:1751-6. [PMID: 15172772] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17. Mamdani M, Rochon P, Juurlink DN, Anderson GM, Kopp A, Naglie G, et al. Effect of selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors and naproxen on short-term risk of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:481-6. [PMID: 12588209] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18. Catella-Lawson F, Reilly MP, Kapoor SC, Cucchiara AJ, DeMarco S, Tournier B, et al. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors and the antiplatelet effects of aspirin. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1809-17. [PMID: 11752357] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19. Konstam MA, Weir MR, Reicin A, Shapiro D, Sperling RS, Barr E, et al. Cardiovascular thrombotic events in controlled, clinical trials of rofecoxib. Circulation. 2001;104:2280-8. [PMID: 11696466] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20. Burklow J, Ralbovsky D. NIH halts use of COX-2 inhibitor in large cancer prevention trial. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health; 2004. Google Scholar21. Associated Press. Concerns raised about naproxen. Alzheimer's study halted over heart attack increase. Accessed at us.cnn.com/2004/HEALTH/12/20/study.halted.ap on 4 January 2005. Google Scholar22. Juni P, Nartey L, Reichenbach S, Sterchi R, Dieppe PA, Egger M. Risk of cardiovascular events and rofecoxib: cumulative meta-analysis. Lancet. 2004;364:2021-9. [PMID: 15582059] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar23. Silverstein FE, Faich G, Goldstein JL, Simon LS, Pincus T, Whelton A, et al. Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: a randomized, controlled trial. Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study. JAMA. 2000;284:1247-55. [PMID: 10979111] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Comments0 CommentsSign In to Submit A Comment Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: Axel Finckh, MD, MS; Mark D. Aronson, MDAffiliations: From Brigham and Women's Hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.Grant Support: By the Centocor Health Outcomes in Rheumatic Diseases (CHORD) fellowship and the Kirkland Foundation and the National Institutes of Health (P60 AR 47782) and the Stoneman Center for Quality Improvement, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.Disclosures: Grants pending: A. Finckh (Wyeth).Corresponding Author: Axel Finckh, MD, MS, Section of Clinical Sciences, Robert B. Brigham Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases Clinical Research Center, PBB 3, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail, afinckh@post.harvard.edu.Current Author Addresses: Dr. Finckh: Section of Clinical Sciences, Robert B. Brigham Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases Clinical Research Center, PBB 3, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115.Dr. Aronson: Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoPatients Exposed to Rofecoxib and Celecoxib Have Different Odds of Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction Stephen E. Kimmel , Jesse A. Berlin , Muredach Reilly , Jane Jaskowiak , Lori Kishel , Jesse Chittams , and Brian L. Strom Metrics Cited byUsing chemical and biological data to predict drug toxicityC-phycocyanin: a natural product with radiosensitizing property for enhancement of colon cancer radiation therapy efficacy through inhibition of COX-2 expressionManagement with Steroids: Local and SystemicFish oil augments celecoxib mediated alteration in apoptotic pathway in the initiation phase of 7,12-dimethylbenz(α)anthracene-induced mammary carcinogenesisCelecoxib and fish oil: a combination strategy for decreased inflammatory mediators in early stages of experimental mammary cancerTAM receptor deficiency affects adult hippocampal neurogenesisAlzheimer's disease and chronic periodontitis: Is there an association?Alteration in apoptosis and cell cycle by celecoxib and/or fish oil in 7,12-dimethyl benzene (α) anthracene-induced mammary carcinogenesisPain in Respiratory DiseaseModeling the binding modes of stilbene analogs to cyclooxygenase-2: a molecular docking studyEudragit S-100 entrapped chitosan microspheres of valdecoxib for colon cancerRofecoxib, but not celecoxib, increases the risk of thromboembolic cardiovascular events in young adults—a nationwide registry-based studyTumor MicroenvironmentAn update on the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Alzheimer's diseaseThe Role of PPAR in the Cyclooxygenase Pathway in Lung CancerPerioperative Medication Management in Arthritic PatientsCyclooxygenase-2 in Cardiovascular BiologyNonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory DrugsAcute Pain ManagementCardiovascular events associated with the use of four nonselective NSAIDs (Etodolac, Nabumetone, Ibuprofen, or Naproxen) Versus a Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor (Celecoxib): A population-based analysis in taiwanese adultsPerioperative Medication Management for the Patient With Rheumatoid ArthritisMeta-Analysis: Cardiovascular Events Associated with Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory DrugsLigand Coordinate Analysis of SC-558 from the Active Site to the Surface of COX-2: A Molecular Dynamics StudyParthenolide Cooperates with NS398 to Inhibit Growth of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells through Effects on Apoptosis and G0-G1 Cell Cycle ArrestCoxibs Versus Combination NSAID and PPI Therapy for Chronic Pain: An Exploration of the Risks, Benefits, and CostsSolid malignancies among patients in the Wegener's granulomatosis etanercept trialAge and rising rates of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor useComparative cardiovascular safety of traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugsSynthesis of 4-(5-[18F]fluoromethyl-3-phenylisoxazol-4-yl)benzenesulfonamide, a new [18F]fluorinated analogue of valdecoxib, as a potential radiotracer for imaging cyclooxygenase-2 with positron emission tomographyInflammation and Ethnomedicine: Looking to our PastClinical therapeutics for musculoskeletal disorders: what??s working and what??s not workingPHARMACOLOGY AND DRUG THERAPYUnderstanding the COX-2/NSAID Dilemma 1 February 2005Volume 142, Issue 3Page: 212-214KeywordsCardiovascular disease riskCyclooxygenase 2Drug safetyDrugsEnzymesMyocardial infarctionNSAIDsProstaglandinsSafetyToxicity ePublished: 1 February 2005 Issue Published: 1 February 2005 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2005 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...