Evaluation of aromatase expression in mammographically dense and non-dense regions of the breast in healthy women.
Authors: C Vachon, H Sasano, K Ghosh, K Brandt, R Santen, D Watson, W Lingle, P Goss, L Hartmann, C Reynolds, VS Pankratz, J Ingle
Journal: Cancer Research (2009)

Abstract Abstract #4033 Background: Aromatase activity within the breast is a source of estrogen that may cause breast cancer. Mammographic density (MD) is a risk factor for breast cancer whose biologic basis is unknown. Our study compared aromatase expression in tissue from dense and non-dense areas of the breasts of healthy volunteers.&amp;#x2028; Methods: Participants were 40+ yrs, had a screening mammogram with visible MD, no history of cancer and were not on endocrine therapy. Ultrasound-guided core biopsies were done within 6 months of mammography to obtain three paired cores from mammographically dense and non-dense regions of the breast. Immunostaining for aromatase expression employed the streptavidin-biotin amplification method using the recently developed 677 mouse monoclonal antibody. Immunoreactivity (IR) was scored in terms of proportion of cells staining positive for aromatase (PPC) (0=&amp;lt;1%, 1=1-25%, 2=26-50%, 3=51+% (and 4=75%+ for adipocytes)) and relative immunointensity (0=none, 1=weak, 2=moderate, 3=intense) for each cell type (stroma, normal ductal epithelium, adipocytes). A composite score weighting the PPC by their relative intensity (range 0-9; 0-12 for adipocytes) was also calculated. The sum of the composite score across the three cell types provided a global assessment of aromatase IR. Repeated measures analyses evaluated differences in aromatase IR for dense compared to non-dense tissue within and across cell types. Parameter estimates (β) indicated the average difference between dense and non-dense IR.&amp;#x2028; Results: 18 (37%) of the 49 participants were premenopausal (median age 46 yrs). Summing across cell types, the global composite score showed increased aromatase IR on sections sampled from dense vs. non-dense regions (β=5.3,p&amp;lt;0.001). This global difference reflected increased aromatase IR in the stroma and normal ductal epithelium from dense sections (vs. non-dense). For 42 women with &amp;gt;1% stromal cells on each section, there was evidence for increased IR on dense sections as indicated by the greater PPCs (β=0.9), relative intensity (β=0.7) and composite score (β=2.7)(p's&amp;lt;0.001). Similarly, for 20 women with &amp;gt;1% normal ductal epithelium in both dense and non-dense sections, there was a greater composite score (β=1.4,p=0.004) for cells on dense sections although differences for PPC (β=0.3,p=0.11) and relative intensity (β=0.3,p=0.09) did not reach statistical significance. No differences were seen in IR for adipocytes from the two density regions (46 women). Findings were unchanged with adjustment for covariates, including proportions of each cell type per section.&amp;#x2028; Conclusions: There is strong evidence for increased aromatase expression in the stromal and normal ductal epithelium of dense vs. non-dense tissue. These results support ongoing research into mammographic density as a biomarker of effect of aromatase inhibitors. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 4033.