Mechanical Breath Profile of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation
Authors: Michaela Kollisch-Singule, Bryanna Emr, Bradford Smith, Shreyas Roy, Sumeet Jain, Joshua Satalin, Kathy Snyder, Penny Andrews, Nader Habashi, Jason Bates, William Marx, Gary Nieman, Louis A. Gatto
Journal: JAMA Surgery (2014)

<h3>Importance</h3> Improper mechanical ventilation settings can exacerbate acute lung injury by causing a secondary ventilator-induced lung injury. It is therefore important to establish the mechanism by which the ventilator induces lung injury to develop protective ventilation strategies. It has been postulated that the mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury is the result of heterogeneous, elevated strain on the pulmonary parenchyma. Acute lung injury has been associated with increases in whole-lung macrostrain, which is correlated with increased pathology. However, the effect of mechanical ventilation on alveolar microstrain remains unknown. <h3>Objective</h3> To examine whether the mechanical breath profile of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV), consisting of a prolonged pressure-time profile and brief expiratory release phase, reduces microstrain. <h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3> In a randomized, nonblinded laboratory animal study, rats were randomized into a controlled mandatory ventilation group (n = 3) and an APRV group (n = 3). Lung injury was induced by polysorbate lavage. A thoracotomy was performed and an in vivo microscope was placed on the lungs to measure alveolar mechanics. <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> In the controlled mandatory ventilation group, multiple levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; 5, 10, 16, 20, and 24 cm H<sub>2</sub>O) were tested. In the APRV group, decreasing durations of expiratory release (time at low pressure [T<sub>low</sub>]) were tested. The T<sub>low</sub>was set to achieve ratios of termination of peak expiratory flow rate (T-PEFR) to peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) of 10%, 25%, 50%, and 75% (the smaller this ratio is [ie, 10%], the more time the lung is exposed to low pressure during the release phase, which decreases end-expiratory lung volume and potentiates derecruitment). Alveolar perimeters were measured at peak inspiration and end expiration using digital image analysis, and strain was calculated by normalizing the change in alveolar perimeter length to the original length. Macrostrain was measured by volume displacement. <h3>Results</h3> Higher PEEP (16-24 cm H<sub>2</sub>O) and a brief T<sub>low</sub>(APRV T-PEFR to PEFR ratio of 75%) reduced microstrain. Microstrain was minimized with an APRV T-PEFR to PEFR ratio of 75% (mean [SEM], 0.05 [0.03]) and PEEP of 16 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (mean [SEM], 0.09 [0.08]), but an APRV T-PEFR to PEFR ratio of 75% also promoted alveolar recruitment compared with PEEP of 16 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (mean [SEM] total inspiratory area, 52.0% [2.9%] vs 29.4% [4.3%], respectively;<i>P</i> &lt; .05). Whole-lung strain was correlated with alveolar microstrain in tested settings (<i>P</i> &lt; .05) except PEEP of 16 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (<i>P</i> &gt; .05). <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> Increased positive-end expiratory pressure and reduced time at low pressure (decreased T<sub>low</sub>) reduced alveolar microstrain. Reduced microstrain and improved alveolar recruitment using an APRV T-PEFR to PEFR ratio of 75% may be the mechanism of lung protection seen in previous clinical and animal studies.