Microarray-based determination of ER, PR and HER2 receptor status: validation and comparison with IHC assessments.
Authors: P Roepman, H Horlings, O Krijgsman, J Bueno-de-Mesquita, R Bender, S Linn, A Glas, M van de Vijver
Journal: Cancer Research (2009)

Abstract Abstract #3007 Background&amp;#x2028; In breast cancer patients the level of expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 is predictive for prognosis and/or treatment response. However, differences in assessment methods and interpretation can substantially affect the accuracy and reproducibility of the results. Previously, we have determined the association between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and mRNA levels for ER, PR and HER2, and have confirmed the accuracy of microarray readout on &amp;gt;400 samples. In the current study we describe the use of this microarray based readout on prospectively collected samples. We compared these readouts with multiple IHC and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assessments generated in various hospitals and a CLIA-certified reference laboratory and developed a microarray based test called TargetPrint™.&amp;#x2028; Methods&amp;#x2028; Gene expression data for ER, PR and HER2 were obtained by analysis of 100 breast carcinomas that have been collected prospectively within the RASTER study. Samples were stratified as receptor positive or negative using thresholds for ER, PR and HER2 mRNA levels. IHC assessment was performed (1) according to local standards of the hospital from where the sample originated, (2) by the central laboratory of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, and (3) at an independent reference laboratory using FDA-approved procedures and ASCO/CAP guidelines. A tumor was classified positive for ER and PR when ≥10% of tumor cells showed positive staining. HER2 IHC status was scored as 0, 1+, 2+ or 3+; a score of 3+ was considered positive. In case of 2+ samples, a FISH was performed to assess final HER2 amplification status. The cohort used in this study was pre-selected to include about two-third ER and PR positive samples and one-third HER2 positive samples.&amp;#x2028; Results&amp;#x2028; Multiple microarray readouts were highly reproducible (Pearson correlation 0.991) and resulted in 67, 61 and 39 percent positive samples for ER, PR and HER2, respectively. Comparison of microarray results with IHC (including FISH for HER2) performed at the three centers indicated highly similar results for receptor readout with a concordance of 92, 93 and 92% for ER; 84, 81 and 86% for PR; and 93, 95 and 94% for HER2. Overall misclassification rates between microarray and IHC readout were low for ER (0.08) and HER2 (0.06) and quite low for PR (0.14), and were comparable to the misclassification rates between the three IHC methods.&amp;#x2028; Conclusion&amp;#x2028; A microarray-based assessment of ER, PR and HER2 in relation to mRNA levels gives results comparable to multiple IHC methods and FISH and provides an objective and more quantitative assessment of tumor receptor status than IHC alone. Using TargetPrint™ for microarray readouts for hormone and HER2 receptor in addition to standard IHC will improve molecular characterization of breast cancer tissue. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 3007.