Phase I study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of radiation in standard daily and hyperfractionated-accelerated twice-daily radiation schedules with concurrent chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.
Authors: N C Choi, J E Herndon, J Rosenman, R W Carey, C T Chung, S Bernard, L Leone, S Seagren, M Green
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology (1998)

An improvement in radiation dose schedule is necessary to increase local tumor control and survival in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. The goal of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of radiation (RT) in both standard daily and hyperfractionated-accelerated (HA) twice-daily RT schedules in concurrent chemoradiation.The study design consisted of a sequential dose escalation in both daily and HA twice-daily RT regimens. RT dose to the initial volume was kept at 40 to 40.5 Gy, while it was gradually increased to the boost volume by adding a 7% to 11 % increment of total dose to subsequent cohorts. The MTD was defined as the radiation dose level at one cohort below that which resulted in more than 33% of patients experiencing grade > or = 4 acute esophagitis and/or grade > or = 3 pulmonary toxicity. The study plan included nine cohorts, five on HA twice-daily and four on daily regimens for the dose escalation. Chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of cisplatin 33 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 3 over 30 minutes, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 on day 1 intravenously (IV) over 1 hour, and etoposide 80 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 3 over 1 hour every 3 weeks (PCE) and two cycles of PE. RT was started at the initiation of the fourth cycle of chemotherapy.Fifty patients were enrolled onto the study. The median age was 60 years (range, 38-79), sex ratio 2.3:1 for male to female, weight loss less than 5% in 73%, and performance score 0 to 1 in 94% and 2 in 6% of patients. In HA twice-daily RT, grade > or = 4 acute esophagitis was noted in two of five (40%), two of seven (29%), four of six (67%), and five of six patients (86%) at 50 (1.25 Gy twice daily), 45, 50, and 55.5 Gy in 1.5 Gy twice daily, 5 d/wk, respectively. Grade > or = 3 pulmonary toxicity was not seen in any of these 24 patients. Therefore, the MTD for HA twice-daily RT was judged to be 45 Gy in 30 fractions over 3 weeks. In daily RT, grade > or = 4 acute esophagitis was noted in zero of four, zero of four, one of five (20%), and two of six patients (33%) at 56, 60, 66, and 70 Gy on a schedule of 2 Gy per fraction per day, five fractions per week. Grade > or = 3 pneumonitis was not observed in any of the 19 patients. Thus, the MTD for daily RT was judged to be at least 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks. Grade 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 53% and 6% of patients, respectively, during the first three cycles of PCE. During chemotherapy cycles 4 to 5, grade 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were noted in 43% and 29% of patients at 45 Gy in 30 fractions over 3 weeks (MTD) by HA twice-daily RT and 50% and 17% at 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (MTD) by daily RT, respectively. The overall tumor response consisted of complete remission (CR) in 51% (24 of 47), partial remission (PR) in 38% (1 8 of 47), and stable disease in 2% (one of 47). The median survival time of all patients was 24.4 months and 2- and 3-year survival rates were 53% and 28%, respectively. With regard to the different radiation schedules, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 52% and 25% for the HA twice-daily and 54% and 35% for the daily RT cohorts.The MTD of HA twice-daily RT was determined to be 45 Gy in 30 fractions over 3 weeks, while it was judged to be at least 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks for daily RT. A phase III randomized trial to compare standard daily RT with HA twice-daily RT at their MTD for local tumor control and survival would be a sensible research in searching for a more effective RT dose-schedule than those that are being used currently.