Abstract S4-4: SECRAB: The Optimal SEquencing of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (CT) and RAdiotherapy (RT) in Early Breast Cancer (EBC), Results of a UK Multicentre Prospective Randomised Trial
Authors: IN Fernando, SJ Bowden, L Buckley, R Grieve, D Spooner, RK Agrawal, AM Brunt, AD Stockdale, MJ Churn, A Stevens, A Marshall, P, Canney
Journal: Cancer Research (2010)

Abstract Background: The optimal sequence of CT and RT for women with EBC has yet to be defined. SECRAB aimed to determine i) if synchronous (Syn) CT-RT improves loco-regional relapse rates (LRR) and ii) whether the treatments could be given together without increased toxicity or compromising the dose intensity of either CT or RT. The first endpoint of this study is presented in this abstract. Methods: SECRAB was a prospective, randomised trial comparing sequential (Seq) to Syn CT-RT. Permitted RT schedules included 40Gy/15F over 3 weeks, 45Gy/20F over 4 weeks and 50Gy/25F over 5 weeks. Syn RT was administered between cycles 2 and 3 for CMF or 5 and 6 for anthracycline-CMF. Syn patients treated using 15F were treated predominantly using a sandwich schedule while those receiving &amp;gt;15F were treated concurrently with CT. Seq RT was delivered on CT completion. Key eligibility criteria were completely excised EBC, fit for and requiring adjuvant CT and RT. The trial was powered to produce a definitive event driven analysis: 150 loco-regional relapses having 85% power to detect 4% 2-sided differences in the primary endpoint of overall LRR. Results: Between Jul 98 and Mar 04, 2296 women were randomised. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. 63% of patients were node positive indicating a high risk population. 2 patients did not receive CT and 23 did not receive RT. 5 patients in the latter group had a loco-regional relapse prior to planned RT (Seq n=3). With a median follow-up of 8.8 years there were 93 and 76 loco-regional relapses in the Seq and Syn arms and 5-year LRR were 7.4% (95% CI 5.9-9.1) and 5.4% (95% CI 4.2-7.0) respectively. There was no significant difference in overall LRR (HRSyn 0.82; 95% CI 0.6-1.1; p=0.19). There was a trend for benefit for Syn treatment which was consistent across different subgroups (grade, lymph node status, tumour size, vascular invasion and excision margin). In an unplanned subgroup analysis, a trend for benefit for Syn treatment was seen predominantly in patients with the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LRR 11.9% Seq vs 8.2% Syn) and also in patients with 0 and 1-3 positive nodes (LRR 7.8% Seq vs 5.2% Syn) but not in those with 4 or more positive nodes. Similar rates were observed for distant recurrences (22.2% vs 22.2%), contralateral recurrences (2.9% vs 2.7%), and new primary cancers (2.9% vs 2.6%) in the Seq and Syn arms respectively. There was also no significant difference in overall survival which was 83% and 82% in the Syn and Seq arms respectively at 5-years (HRSyn 0.99; 95% CI 0.8-1.2; p=0.87). Modest differences in acute skin toxicity and telangiectasia were observed between the two study arms. There was no difference in other late toxicities. The second primary endpoint of safety, toxicity and dose intensity is described in detail elsewhere (abstract no 850168). Conclusions: SECRAB is the largest sequencing trial in EBC to date. Delivering Syn CT-RT using CMF or anthracycline-CMF and a 3 weekly RT fractionation shortens the overall treatment time. Although not statistically significant there was a trend to improved locoregional control with Syn treatment. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S4-4.