Abstract 5562: Utility of circulating biomarkers as outcome predictors in metastatic colorectal cancer and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme patients treated with bevacizumab/sorafenib
Authors: Jacqueline M. Lafky, S. Keith Anderson, Bruce W. Morlan, Garth D. Nelson, Xiomara W. Carrero, Shaji Kumar, John T. Reynolds, Philip J. Stella, Shaker R. Dakhil, William S. Loui, Steven R. Alberts, Patrick J. Flynn, Howard M. Gross, Kurt A. Jaeckle, Jan C. Buckner, Evanthia Galanis, Axel Grothey
Journal: Cancer Research (2012)

Abstract Purpose: Surrogate biomarkers are lacking for predicting or monitoring response to anti-angiogenesis therapies. We investigated whether circulating biomarkers (CBMs) of angiogenesis (i.e., bFGF, SDF-1α, HGF, sKIT, Ang-2, and PlGF) correlated with treatment efficacy in a pooled analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (rGBM) patients (pts) treated with bevacizumab/sorafenib (BEV/SOR). Experimental procedures: Peripheral blood samples were obtained for CBM analyses from pts enrolled in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase II studies N054C (mCRC, n=75, Grothey, ASCO 2010) and N0776 (rGBM, n=54, Galanis, ASCO 2010). Blood collection time points were: baseline (BL), cycle 1 day 3 (C1D3), prior to treatment cycles 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and after the pt went off study. Plasma CBM levels were determined by commercially-available ELISAs (R&amp;D Systems) and performed according to manufacturer's instructions. For each CBM, a linear regression model that adjusted for study was used to evaluate the correlation with either progression-free survival (PFS) success/failure or progression within 14 days of the last blood draw for the following measures: absolute BL levels, log2 BL levels; C1D3 log2-fold change (FC) from BL, prior to cycle 2 log2-FC from BL, last draw log2-FC from BL, and last draw log2-FC from prior draw. Results summary: There appears to be no significant difference in the PFS or overall survival (OS) between the pts on these two studies; therefore, we pooled the patients from both studies for a combined analyses. We found no difference in absolute or log2 levels for any of the CBMs during the course of BEV/SOR treatment. In these pooled analyses, we found increased absolute and increased log2 BL SDF-1α levels were significantly correlated with PFS success (p=0.023 and p=0.02, respectively). After correcting for multiple comparisons (method of Benjamini &amp; Hochberg) the p-values &amp;lt;0.05 had a false-discovery-rate of 41.4%. None of the other CBM measures were significantly correlated with either PFS success/failure or progression within 14 days of the last blood draw (all p&amp;gt;0.10). Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that SDF-1α may be a useful CBM for determining treatment efficacy in these pts treated with BEV/SOR. Further prospective validation of SDF-1α for predicting pt progression with this treatment combination in advanced disease (e.g., mCRC and rGBM) appears warranted. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5562. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-5562