Abstract P5-12-05: Breast cancer (BC) following prophylactic mastectomy (PM), a clinical entity: Presentation, management, and outcomes
Authors: Robert W Mutter, Tanya L Hoskin, Marlene H Frost, Joanne L Johnson, Lynn C Hartmann, Judy C Boughey
Journal: Cancer Research (2015)

Abstract Objective: Contralateral PM (CPM) and Bilateral PM (BPM) markedly decrease, but do not completely eliminate the possibility of development of a new BC on the side of the PM. Given the relative infrequency of its occurrence, little is known about the clinical characteristics, presentation, and management of patients who develop BC after PM. Our aim was to review our institutional experience of BC occurring after PM. Methods: Between 1960 and 1993, 1,065 women underwent BPM and 1,643 women with unilateral BC treated with therapeutic mastectomy underwent a CPM. Medical records were reviewed and study-specific questionnaires were sent to all women at 10 years and 20 years after PM. BC after PM included locoregional invasive BC or DCIS on the side of the PM. Results: Thirteen patients who underwent BPM developed BC after PM. Twelve patients who underwent CPM developed a subsequent BC on the side of the CPM. The median follow-up time from PM was 22 years (range 3-34). Detailed clinical characteristics of BC after PM are shown in Table 1. Presentations included: disease limited to the axilla without evidence of a local primary 4 (16%); synchronous local and axillary disease 1 (4%); synchronous local disease and distant metastases 4 (16%); clinically isolated local disease 17 (68%). Characteristics of BC Following PM All Patients (n=25)BPM Cohort (n=13)CPM Cohort (n=12)Median age at diagnosis of BC after PM56 (range 38-81)58 (range 38-71)54 (range 39-81)Median time to development of BC after PM (years)7 (range 1-25)6 (range 2-25)8 (range 1-21)Presentation Self-detected abnormality23 (92%)12 (92%)11 (92%)Screening mammogram1 (4%)02 (16%)Not known1 (4%)1 (8%)0Local disease only17 (68%)10 (77%)7 (58%)-Sub-areolar7 (41%)6 (40%)1 (8%)-UOQ/axillary tail2 (12%)02 (16%)-Lower/inframmamary crease2 (12%)1 (10%)1(8%)Chest wall or unspecified6 (35%)3 (30%)3 (25%)Local &amp; regional (axillary) disease1 (4%01 (8%)Axillary BC without evidence of local primary4 (16%)1 (8%)3 (25%)Synchronous local and distant disease3 (12%)2 (15%)1 (8%) Of the 17 patients with isolated local disease, 11 (65%) underwent a completion/redo mastectomy, local excision of the tumor was performed in 5 (29%), and surgical management was unknown in 1 (6%). Ten of 17 (59%) underwent axillary lymph node dissection, 1 (6%) underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, 1 did not undergo axillary staging, and axillary management was unknown in 5 (29%). Median tumor size was 0.9 cm (range 0.3-3.5) and only 1 of 17 (6%) patients was confirmed to have pathologic nodal involvement. Twelve of 17 (71%) received some type of adjuvant therapy: chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy 3 (18%); radiotherapy 2 (12%); both 5 (29%); none 5 (29%). With a median follow-up of 7 years since diagnosis of local BC after PM, there has been one isolated local recurrence and 2 distant recurrences as first event. Conclusion: BC can occur after PM. With rising rates of PM, understanding management of BC after PM is important. Most common presentation is local disease and can be managed with resection with consideration of adjuvant therapy. Multidisciplinary management of these cases is needed. Citation Format: Robert W Mutter, Tanya L Hoskin, Marlene H Frost, Joanne L Johnson, Lynn C Hartmann, Judy C Boughey. Breast cancer (BC) following prophylactic mastectomy (PM), a clinical entity: Presentation, management, and outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-05.