tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone else how to live.
Update: The person is a hoarder and their house is about to be condemned.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone else how to live.
Update: They are an adult and not breaking any laws.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone else how to live.
Update: They have asked for guidance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone else how to live.
Update: What you are telling them is judgmental.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone else how to live.
Update: They ask you for your opinion.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone else how to live.
Update: You don’t know them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone else how to live.
Update: You are their parent and giving them life advice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone else how to live.
Update: You are making bigoted judgements about their personal life choices.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone else how to live.
Update: They are under your care.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone else how to live.
Update: They have plans for their own life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to snub your parents.
Update: Your parents abused you growing up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to snub your parents.
Update: Your parents were loving and supportive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to snub your parents.
Update: They are very cruel and mean to you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to snub your parents.
Update: They take the time to be with you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to snub your parents.
Update: They forgot your birthday.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to snub your parents.
Update: They are old and suffering from dementia.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to snub your parents.
Update: they have treated you poorly your whole life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to snub your parents.
Update: they have been supportive and loving.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to snub your parents.
Update: Your parents have been neglectful or abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to snub your parents.
Update: They are trying to help and support you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people should repay their debts.
Update: You were told upfront that it was forgiven.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people should repay their debts.
Update: You said you were going to repay it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people should repay their debts.
Update: The debt is a student loan that their parents agreed to repay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people should repay their debts.
Update: They want a good credit score.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people should repay their debts.
Update: They are getting them waived by the government
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people should repay their debts.
Update: Family members lent them money
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people should repay their debts.
Update: they declare bankruptcy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people should repay their debts.
Update: they took out a loan at the bank.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people should repay their debts.
Update: it gets so bad they have to file bankruptcy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people should repay their debts.
Update: they have to money to do so.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to pleasure yourself if that's what you want to do.
Update: you're trying to abstain from pleasure for religious reasons
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to pleasure yourself if that's what you want to do.
Update: you believe that you deserve it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to pleasure yourself if that's what you want to do.
Update: you are in a public place.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to pleasure yourself if that's what you want to do.
Update: you are in the privacy of your own bedroom.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to pleasure yourself if that's what you want to do.
Update: You're in a public place frequented by children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to pleasure yourself if that's what you want to do.
Update: You're alone in your own bedroom.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to pleasure yourself if that's what you want to do.
Update: you're neglecting others in your life by pursuing the pleasure
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to pleasure yourself if that's what you want to do.
Update: your life is in order
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to take something you don't really need when someone else could use it.
Update: It would keep them from harming themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to take something you don't really need when someone else could use it.
Update: They can't afford to replace it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to take something you don't really need when someone else could use it.
Update: You're giving it to someone who needs it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to take something you don't really need when someone else could use it.
Update: You have everything you need.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to take something you don't really need when someone else could use it.
Update: They were going to use it to deliver illegal drugs to themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to take something you don't really need when someone else could use it.
Update: They are poor and disadvantaged.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to take something you don't really need when someone else could use it.
Update: You think you might need it in a future emergency.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to take something you don't really need when someone else could use it.
Update: The other person might not be able to afford it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to take something you don't really need when someone else could use it.
Update: it is dangerous of the other person to have.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to take something you don't really need when someone else could use it.
Update: you are going to dispose of it right away.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to hog an entire area for yourself.
Update: You are totally alone
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to hog an entire area for yourself.
Update: There are other people looking to sit down
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to hog an entire area for yourself.
Update: you have asked permission because you need a lot of space for a project.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to hog an entire area for yourself.
Update: you have been told to share equally with others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to hog an entire area for yourself.
Update: That area was formally allocated to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to hog an entire area for yourself.
Update: You're squatting in someone else's space.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to hog an entire area for yourself.
Update: you are the only person present
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to hog an entire area for yourself.
Update: someone else needs space
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to hog an entire area for yourself.
Update: You bought a home and the surrounding property.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to hog an entire area for yourself.
Update: A lot of people have to share a limited space.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to try and get a bargain at your friends expense.
Update: you simply cannot afford what you're trying to get otherwise
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to try and get a bargain at your friends expense.
Update: you don't really need what you're trying to buy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to try and get a bargain at your friends expense.
Update: Your friend's small business is their only source of income
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to try and get a bargain at your friends expense.
Update: Your friend gets multiple employee discounts.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to try and get a bargain at your friends expense.
Update: Your friend just lost their job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to try and get a bargain at your friends expense.
Update: They're trying to sell something that they received for free.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to try and get a bargain at your friends expense.
Update: You want to remain good friends with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to try and get a bargain at your friends expense.
Update: They asked you to do so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to try and get a bargain at your friends expense.
Update: It could hurt their job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be mad when others are disrespecting your privacy
Update: They are throwing you a surprise party
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be mad when others are disrespecting your privacy
Update: You are trying to get work done
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be mad when others are disrespecting your privacy
Update: You live as a monk in a one room monastery.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be mad when others are disrespecting your privacy
Update: You are in a dressing room at a department store.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be mad when others are disrespecting your privacy
Update: they are police officers investigating you for criminal activity of which you are guilty
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be mad when others are disrespecting your privacy
Update: they are friends who understand your need for privacy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be mad when others are disrespecting your privacy
Update: They are trying to prevent you from doing something dangerous you will regret later.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be mad when others are disrespecting your privacy
Update: You have told them repeatedly you want to be alone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be mad when others are disrespecting your privacy
Update: You're the target of a police investigation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be mad when others are disrespecting your privacy
Update: Your parents were looking through your things.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to look at your sibling's comments online.
Update: they are private messages.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to look at your sibling's comments online.
Update: they are posted on your own timeline.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to look at your sibling's comments online.
Update: you are logging in as somebody else so they don't know its you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to look at your sibling's comments online.
Update: they are made public.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to look at your sibling's comments online.
Update: They're about their sexual relationships.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to look at your sibling's comments online.
Update: They're about your family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to look at your sibling's comments online.
Update: they've made their account private
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to look at your sibling's comments online.
Update: you have them as a friend online
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to look at your sibling's comments online.
Update: They are very secretive and they trust you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to look at your sibling's comments online.
Update: You think they are getting involved in the wrong crowd
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should have a say in the decision to abort a baby you helped create.
Update: you forced yourself on the other person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should have a say in the decision to abort a baby you helped create.
Update: it was agreed upon before the pregnancy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should have a say in the decision to abort a baby you helped create.
Update: You aren't the one with a uterus.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should have a say in the decision to abort a baby you helped create.
Update: You are the one who is pregnant.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should have a say in the decision to abort a baby you helped create.
Update: You're threatening the health of the mother.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should have a say in the decision to abort a baby you helped create.
Update: You're the one expected to sacrifice your body for nine months.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should have a say in the decision to abort a baby you helped create.
Update: you are a male and it is not your body
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should have a say in the decision to abort a baby you helped create.
Update: it is your body that is affected by pregnancy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect your parter to remain faithful.
Update: You are in a non-monogamous relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect your parter to remain faithful.
Update: You are in a monogamous marriage.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect your parter to remain faithful.
Update: You are in an open relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect your parter to remain faithful.
Update: You've both discussed being specifically monogamous.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect your parter to remain faithful.
Update: You are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect your parter to remain faithful.
Update: you have an open relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect your parter to remain faithful.
Update: you want your marriage to remain strong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect your parter to remain faithful.
Update: You cheated first
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect your parter to remain faithful.
Update: you are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse someone of something they haven't done.
Update: You are convinced they have done it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse someone of something they haven't done.
Update: Wrongfully accusing them will harm your friendship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse someone of something they haven't done.
Update: they will get away with something worse they did if they aren't arrested.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse someone of something they haven't done.
Update: they will go to prison as a result.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse someone of something they haven't done.
Update: You have definite proof they did it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse someone of something they haven't done.
Update: You have hearsay of the act.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse someone of something they haven't done.
Update: you are trying to protect yourself
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse someone of something they haven't done.
Update: the person will get arrested for it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse someone of something they haven't done.
Update: The consequences will be severe.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to call someone by something you are not comfortable with
Update: It's an offensive term
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to call someone by something you are not comfortable with
Update: Someone wants you to call them by a common standard name.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to call someone by something you are not comfortable with
Update: It includes profanity.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to call someone by something you are not comfortable with
Update: they asked you to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to call someone by something you are not comfortable with
Update: you are sure how to pronounce it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to call someone by something you are not comfortable with
Update: you are working for a government entity
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to call someone by something you are not comfortable with
Update: they want to be called a curse word
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to call someone by something you are not comfortable with
Update: it would hurt their feelings if you didn't.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to call someone by something you are not comfortable with
Update: it is something profane.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you seek acceptation after being rejected.
Update: You don't seek acceptance from others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you seek acceptation after being rejected.
Update: You need acceptance from others to thrive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you seek acceptation after being rejected.
Update: You have already accepted a better offer elsewhere.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you seek acceptation after being rejected.
Update: You really want the opportunity.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you seek acceptation after being rejected.
Update: you don't like them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you seek acceptation after being rejected.
Update: you really want to be their friend
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you seek acceptation after being rejected.
Update: you're sick of people and want to withdraw from them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you seek acceptation after being rejected.
Update: your self-esteem hangs on what others think of you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you seek acceptation after being rejected.
Update: Your friends are waiting close by
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that roommates will not tell each other what is acceptable behavior and what is not.
Update: The behavior is disruptive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that roommates will not tell each other what is acceptable behavior and what is not.
Update: They are adults and all paying the same amount of rent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that roommates will not tell each other what is acceptable behavior and what is not.
Update: They have had problematic roommates before.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that roommates will not tell each other what is acceptable behavior and what is not.
Update: It is a short term situation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that roommates will not tell each other what is acceptable behavior and what is not.
Update: they want to have a good rooming experience.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that roommates will not tell each other what is acceptable behavior and what is not.
Update: they don't really want to live together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that roommates will not tell each other what is acceptable behavior and what is not.
Update: they're doing something that upsets the other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that roommates will not tell each other what is acceptable behavior and what is not.
Update: they never get issues with each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that roommates will not tell each other what is acceptable behavior and what is not.
Update: They enjoy communicating
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that roommates will not tell each other what is acceptable behavior and what is not.
Update: They've known each other for a decade and are used to how they live together
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get mad at a coworker that is always late.
Update: Your coworker has a medical reason for being late.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get mad at a coworker that is always late.
Update: Your coworker often smells of alcohol when they arrive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get mad at a coworker that is always late.
Update: it is because they are disabled.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get mad at a coworker that is always late.
Update: you are getting in trouble for it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get mad at a coworker that is always late.
Update: You are late more often than your coworker.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get mad at a coworker that is always late.
Update: You have to do your coworker's job when he is not there.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get mad at a coworker that is always late.
Update: They stay later to make up for it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get mad at a coworker that is always late.
Update: They leave before you do
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get mad at a coworker that is always late.
Update: you have no set work schedule.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get mad at a coworker that is always late.
Update: they hold up meetings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be prejudiced.
Update: You are prejudiced against something potentially harmful like mushrooms.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be prejudiced.
Update: You are openly hostile about it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be prejudiced.
Update: The prejudices may be well-founded.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be prejudiced.
Update: The others have given no indication of badness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be prejudiced.
Update: You keep your thoughts to yourself and never speak or act on them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be prejudiced.
Update: You work with a diverse group of people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be prejudiced.
Update: you live in a diverse area.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be prejudiced.
Update: you can substantiate your prejudice
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be prejudiced.
Update: you do so categorically toward groups of people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to send suggestive pictures to your significant other with their permission.
Update: They are at work and this could get them into trouble.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to send suggestive pictures to your significant other with their permission.
Update: They are not in a professional setting and this would not get them into trouble.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to send suggestive pictures to your significant other with their permission.
Update: It's through a work email.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to send suggestive pictures to your significant other with their permission.
Update: You are trying to spice up your relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to send suggestive pictures to your significant other with their permission.
Update: you send the pictures to their work email.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to send suggestive pictures to your significant other with their permission.
Update: they have requested such pictures
Update type: strengthener