tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: Groups of friends should be aware of their surroundings and how their behavior appears to others.
Update: They're alone at one of their friends' houses.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Groups of friends should be aware of their surroundings and how their behavior appears to others.
Update: They're at the mall.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Groups of friends should be aware of their surroundings and how their behavior appears to others.
Update: They are at a big party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Groups of friends should be aware of their surroundings and how their behavior appears to others.
Update: They are breaking other laws.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Groups of friends should be aware of their surroundings and how their behavior appears to others.
Update: They are at a party where everyone is just doing what they want.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Groups of friends should be aware of their surroundings and how their behavior appears to others.
Update: They are at church.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to hold a pet's owner responsible for the actions of their pet
Update: The animal was guarding private property with signs posted.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to hold a pet's owner responsible for the actions of their pet
Update: The animal is unleashed in public.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to hold a pet's owner responsible for the actions of their pet
Update: The pet retaliated against an abusive stranger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to hold a pet's owner responsible for the actions of their pet
Update: The pet was not on a leash.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to hold a pet's owner responsible for the actions of their pet
Update: You removed the pet from its owner's care.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to hold a pet's owner responsible for the actions of their pet
Update: The owner encouraged the pet's actions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to hold a pet's owner responsible for the actions of their pet
Update: You were tormenting the pet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to hold a pet's owner responsible for the actions of their pet
Update: The pet damaged your property.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to hold a pet's owner responsible for the actions of their pet
Update: you antagonized the pet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to hold a pet's owner responsible for the actions of their pet
Update: they don't have the pet on the leash.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect help when it comes to funeral expenses.
Update: The dead person had life insurance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect help when it comes to funeral expenses.
Update: The dead person did not have life insurance.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect help when it comes to funeral expenses.
Update: Your family is very wealthy
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect help when it comes to funeral expenses.
Update: You were hated by everyone in your family
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect help when it comes to funeral expenses.
Update: Your parent dies and you and your siblings
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect help when it comes to funeral expenses.
Update: You can easily afford it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect help when it comes to funeral expenses.
Update: You have a large family.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect help when it comes to funeral expenses.
Update: You are the last member of your family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect help when it comes to funeral expenses.
Update: You've had family offer in the past to help with similar things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect help when it comes to funeral expenses.
Update: Your family is very poor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's inappropriate to spend time with your partner in a room you share with someone else.
Update: the other person is fine with it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's inappropriate to spend time with your partner in a room you share with someone else.
Update: the other person is not comfortable .
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's inappropriate to spend time with your partner in a room you share with someone else.
Update: Your partner has interior-design suggestions..
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's inappropriate to spend time with your partner in a room you share with someone else.
Update: Your partner has designs on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's inappropriate to spend time with your partner in a room you share with someone else.
Update: The other person has gone out and given the two of you privacy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's inappropriate to spend time with your partner in a room you share with someone else.
Update: The other person is still in the room.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's inappropriate to spend time with your partner in a room you share with someone else.
Update: The other person is gone and you have their permission.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's inappropriate to spend time with your partner in a room you share with someone else.
Update: The other person has expressly told you not to do it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's inappropriate to spend time with your partner in a room you share with someone else.
Update: You have your roommate's permission.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's inappropriate to spend time with your partner in a room you share with someone else.
Update: Your roommate doesn't approve.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to ignore dietary restrictions when hosting a family dinner.
Update: You are only cheating for one meal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to ignore dietary restrictions when hosting a family dinner.
Update: You could cause someone to go into anaphylactic shock.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to ignore dietary restrictions when hosting a family dinner.
Update: Those people can go into anaphylactic shock
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to ignore dietary restrictions when hosting a family dinner.
Update: Unless everyone has different dietary restrictions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to ignore dietary restrictions when hosting a family dinner.
Update: Especially if those restrictions are severe allergies.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to ignore dietary restrictions when hosting a family dinner.
Update: You don't have the capability to heed all the dietary restrictions and they aren't harmful.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to ignore dietary restrictions when hosting a family dinner.
Update: You know you can do great harm if you ignore the.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to ignore dietary restrictions when hosting a family dinner.
Update: they specifically said that it's fine.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to ignore dietary restrictions when hosting a family dinner.
Update: they have severe allergies to that stuff.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to be friends with all people.
Update: The people are violent and hostile towards you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to be friends with all people.
Update: The people are friendly and warm.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to be friends with all people.
Update: Some people have been hateful to you or your loved ones.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to be friends with all people.
Update: You have gotten lots of help from other people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to be friends with all people.
Update: Some of the people in question are very abusive and being their friend would hurt you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to be friends with all people.
Update: You don't want to be known as judgmental and want to feel good about yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to be friends with all people.
Update: they are mean to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to be friends with all people.
Update: they wish to be friends with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to be friends with all people.
Update: Those people do not think I should have rights.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to be friends with all people.
Update: Those people are willing to acknowledge my rights.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not know how to deal with someone else's mental illness.
Update: You have been professionally trained in psychology.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not know how to deal with someone else's mental illness.
Update: You're young and inexperienced in helping others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not know how to deal with someone else's mental illness.
Update: They have explained that they have good days and bad days and you still try to make them leave the house on the bad days.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not know how to deal with someone else's mental illness.
Update: You have never known anyone with manic episodes before and didn't know what to expect.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not know how to deal with someone else's mental illness.
Update: You're a trained mental health professional
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not know how to deal with someone else's mental illness.
Update: You've never encountered a mental health issue before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not know how to deal with someone else's mental illness.
Update: You are a psychiatrist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not know how to deal with someone else's mental illness.
Update: You are not a trained professional.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not know how to deal with someone else's mental illness.
Update: You work at a hospital and are trained for such situation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not know how to deal with someone else's mental illness.
Update: You are a child and don't know what to do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like it when people fart near you.
Update: They're a baby and can't help it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like it when people fart near you.
Update: They do it on purpose.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like it when people fart near you.
Update: You are in the early stages of pregnancy and smell everything
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like it when people fart near you.
Update: you are a doctor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like it when people fart near you.
Update: it is really smelly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like it when people fart near you.
Update: It is a helpless baby that doesn't know better.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like it when people fart near you.
Update: You are in an enclosed room and no fresh air can get in.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to cause other's to be deceived.
Update: You're trying to trick a serial killer into going to a police station to be arrested.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to cause other's to be deceived.
Update: You're trying to scam them out of their life savings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to cause other's to be deceived.
Update: You're a wall street broker and you make tons of money doing that every day.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to cause other's to be deceived.
Update: You care about them as people and don't want them to be upset with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to cause other's to be deceived.
Update: Unless you are playing a game together.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to cause other's to be deceived.
Update: The deception will cause them pain.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to cause other's to be deceived.
Update: it's for a joke.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to cause other's to be deceived.
Update: it could cause them harm.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to cause other's to be deceived.
Update: You are planning a surprise party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to cause other's to be deceived.
Update: You want to be known as trustworthy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with your co-workers if it would let them know that their work quality isn't up to par.
Update: Your work quality is worse than theirs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with your co-workers if it would let them know that their work quality isn't up to par.
Update: Their job is on the line.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with your co-workers if it would let them know that their work quality isn't up to par.
Update: The performance evaluations are coming up
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with your co-workers if it would let them know that their work quality isn't up to par.
Update: They will get offended
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with your co-workers if it would let them know that their work quality isn't up to par.
Update: They want to know how well they are doing
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with your co-workers if it would let them know that their work quality isn't up to par.
Update: Your coworkers are prone to retaliation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with your co-workers if it would let them know that their work quality isn't up to par.
Update: Your coworkers asked you for feedback.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with your co-workers if it would let them know that their work quality isn't up to par.
Update: They are your supervisor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with your co-workers if it would let them know that their work quality isn't up to par.
Update: Employee profit sharing is involved.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: Your partner supports you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: Your partner never returns the support when you need it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: They're working on a goal that will benefit both of you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: They have cheated on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: They need your help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: You find out they are cheating on you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: You want to marry them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: Your partner is trying to hurt themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: Your partner is trying to apply to college.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be mean to your significant other.
Update: You are having an argument.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be mean to your significant other.
Update: His parents are present.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be mean to your significant other.
Update: Your husband leaves his smart watch on the couch and when you move it, you see a private, inappropriate message from a woman at work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be mean to your significant other.
Update: Your husband has a bad temper and it doesn't take much for him to lose it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be mean to your significant other.
Update: You're divorcing after you caught them cheating
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be mean to your significant other.
Update: You are hormonal
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be mean to your significant other.
Update: They have done something that you have asked them many times not to do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be mean to your significant other.
Update: They have just finished making you a lovely dinner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be mean to your significant other.
Update: They were rude to you first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be mean to your significant other.
Update: Their father just passed away.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Interfering with two people interacting can get you in trouble.
Update: You are a referee during a sports event.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Interfering with two people interacting can get you in trouble.
Update: They are criminals in the midst of committing a crime.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Interfering with two people interacting can get you in trouble.
Update: You're a referee and you interfere with two people interacting as part of your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Interfering with two people interacting can get you in trouble.
Update: The interaction has nothing to do with you and is best resolved between the two people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Interfering with two people interacting can get you in trouble.
Update: You are a police officer.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Interfering with two people interacting can get you in trouble.
Update: They are fighting and you don't know them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Interfering with two people interacting can get you in trouble.
Update: they are starting to fight.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Interfering with two people interacting can get you in trouble.
Update: they are a couple.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Interfering with two people interacting can get you in trouble.
Update: Those people are actually two toddlers fighting.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Interfering with two people interacting can get you in trouble.
Update: The people are having a violent argument.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want something back that is yours.
Update: You know the person currently using it really needs it much more than you do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want something back that is yours.
Update: The person promised to return it already and is ignoring you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want something back that is yours.
Update: It is helping someone less fortunate than yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want something back that is yours.
Update: It is a family heirloom.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want something back that is yours.
Update: You gave something away as a permanent gift.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want something back that is yours.
Update: You left something at an ex-partner's apartment.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want something back that is yours.
Update: You sold the item to someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want something back that is yours.
Update: The item was stolen from you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want something back that is yours.
Update: You had promised it to somebody else for that day.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want something back that is yours.
Update: It was taken without your consent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to hurry up and get a big job finished.
Update: It's going to take years to finish a very complex job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to hurry up and get a big job finished.
Update: You already have the next job lined-up as soon as you finish this one.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to hurry up and get a big job finished.
Update: The job must be done slowly for it to be done well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to hurry up and get a big job finished.
Update: The job is tedious and boring.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to hurry up and get a big job finished.
Update: Very careful attention to detail is needed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to hurry up and get a big job finished.
Update: The deadline is looming.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to hurry up and get a big job finished.
Update: The details need more attention.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to hurry up and get a big job finished.
Update: You are almost done.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to hurry up and get a big job finished.
Update: you are waiting for help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to hurry up and get a big job finished.
Update: you are ahead of schedule.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's inconsiderate to string someone along with false hopes for a relationship.
Update: you plan to have a long relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's inconsiderate to string someone along with false hopes for a relationship.
Update: you do not plan to stay together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's inconsiderate to string someone along with false hopes for a relationship.
Update: You are doing it without even knowing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's inconsiderate to string someone along with false hopes for a relationship.
Update: They are developing very strong feelings for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's inconsiderate to string someone along with false hopes for a relationship.
Update: You are experienced and they are not
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's inconsiderate to string someone along with false hopes for a relationship.
Update: You think they are doing the same results thing to you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's inconsiderate to string someone along with false hopes for a relationship.
Update: You keep saying you love them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's inconsiderate to string someone along with false hopes for a relationship.
Update: You are acting in a play.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's inconsiderate to string someone along with false hopes for a relationship.
Update: That person has made it clear they have strong positive feelings for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Most of the time, not communicating with in-laws can save your lots of stress.
Update: Your in laws love you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Most of the time, not communicating with in-laws can save your lots of stress.
Update: They always talk down to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Most of the time, not communicating with in-laws can save your lots of stress.
Update: You and your in-laws are all considerate grown-ups.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Most of the time, not communicating with in-laws can save your lots of stress.
Update: Your in-laws don't accept your marriage.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Most of the time, not communicating with in-laws can save your lots of stress.
Update: They can offer you some support
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Most of the time, not communicating with in-laws can save your lots of stress.
Update: They are very demanding people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Most of the time, not communicating with in-laws can save your lots of stress.
Update: You live with your in-laws
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Most of the time, not communicating with in-laws can save your lots of stress.
Update: You rarely see your in laws
Update type: strengthener