tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: Don't let a friend drag you down.
Update: they're dragging you down to the club to meet a special person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Don't let a friend drag you down.
Update: You know they're on a bad road.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to report an Uber driver that may be complicit in child endangerment.
Update: The driver is intoxicated.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to report an Uber driver that may be complicit in child endangerment.
Update: you fear that a child will be hurt.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to report an Uber driver that may be complicit in child endangerment.
Update: you are making up a lie.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to report an Uber driver that may be complicit in child endangerment.
Update: you think someone is in danger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to report an Uber driver that may be complicit in child endangerment.
Update: your gut feeling is somethings off.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to report an Uber driver that may be complicit in child endangerment.
Update: If the child is in imminent danger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not have to hide a friendship.
Update: The person you are friends with is a bad person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not have to hide a friendship.
Update: Everyone knows who the person is anyway
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not have to hide a friendship.
Update: They are an illegal citizen.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not have to hide a friendship.
Update: You have been friends for a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not have to hide a friendship.
Update: People would kill you for being in an interracial friendship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not have to hide a friendship.
Update: You live in a free country.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not have to hide a friendship.
Update: The friendship is in a war torn country, and you are both on different sides.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not have to hide a friendship.
Update: You both really like each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not have to hide a friendship.
Update: the person asks you to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not have to hide a friendship.
Update: you aren't doing anything wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your friend cheats at gaming, you can make fun of them.
Update: you are cheating as well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your friend cheats at gaming, you can make fun of them.
Update: they blatantly got caught cheating.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your friend cheats at gaming, you can make fun of them.
Update: You know it's the kind of game you are supposed to cheat at.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your friend cheats at gaming, you can make fun of them.
Update: You just have that kind of friendship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your friend cheats at gaming, you can make fun of them.
Update: they didn't realize they were cheated.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your friend cheats at gaming, you can make fun of them.
Update: they had made fun of you for cheating before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your friend cheats at gaming, you can make fun of them.
Update: They are unaware of the rules.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your friend cheats at gaming, you can make fun of them.
Update: They are bragging about winning.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your friend cheats at gaming, you can make fun of them.
Update: They are prone to violence.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your friend cheats at gaming, you can make fun of them.
Update: They cheated to beat you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cheat on your partner.
Update: You have an open marriage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cheat on your partner.
Update: It's at your wedding reception.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cheat on your partner.
Update: both parties agree it's ok.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cheat on your partner.
Update: your partner wants a monogamous relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cheat on your partner.
Update: Your partner is a blow up doll.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cheat on your partner.
Update: You are engaged to be married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cheat on your partner.
Update: you and your partner have an open relationship
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cheat on your partner.
Update: your partner is open, honest and committed to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cheat on your partner.
Update: they give you permission.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cheat on your partner.
Update: you love them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not respect other people's boundaries.
Update: you are in an intimate relationship with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not respect other people's boundaries.
Update: they are a stranger to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not respect other people's boundaries.
Update: they explicitly ask you to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not respect other people's boundaries.
Update: you don't really know them very well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not respect other people's boundaries.
Update: they are harming themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not respect other people's boundaries.
Update: they respect your boundaries.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not respect other people's boundaries.
Update: their actions directly impact your wellbeing
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not respect other people's boundaries.
Update: you expect them to be the same way with you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not respect other people's boundaries.
Update: You are dealing with a drug addict.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not respect other people's boundaries.
Update: You are dealing with friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let something you own make a lot of noise that bothers people.
Update: it's malfunctioning and you cannot control it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let something you own make a lot of noise that bothers people.
Update: you are in a library.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let something you own make a lot of noise that bothers people.
Update: you are doing your best to train your dog to stop barking.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let something you own make a lot of noise that bothers people.
Update: you live in an apartment with thin walls.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let something you own make a lot of noise that bothers people.
Update: you give them warning and get the okay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let something you own make a lot of noise that bothers people.
Update: the neighbors don't like loud noises.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let something you own make a lot of noise that bothers people.
Update: you must use that item to provide critical care for yourself or others
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let something you own make a lot of noise that bothers people.
Update: you are in a library or other place where quietness is the norm
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let something you own make a lot of noise that bothers people.
Update: The iutem making a lot of noise is an infant child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let something you own make a lot of noise that bothers people.
Update: You live in a crowded apartment building.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to request that your partner accommodate your schedule.
Update: Your partner has long working hours.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to request that your partner accommodate your schedule.
Update: Your partner has a part time job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to request that your partner accommodate your schedule.
Update: it significantly inconveniences them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to request that your partner accommodate your schedule.
Update: their schedule is more flexible.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to request that your partner accommodate your schedule.
Update: they don't have any wiggle room in their own schedule.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to request that your partner accommodate your schedule.
Update: your partner is retired.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to request that your partner accommodate your schedule.
Update: They have something important planned.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to request that your partner accommodate your schedule.
Update: You have an important appointment.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to request that your partner accommodate your schedule.
Update: your partner works long hours and is unable to do so
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to request that your partner accommodate your schedule.
Update: you and your partner work long hours and still want to spend time together
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should watch out for other drivers' safety.
Update: You're on a closed driving course.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should watch out for other drivers' safety.
Update: You're on a crowded highway.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should watch out for other drivers' safety.
Update: you are a pedestrian.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should watch out for other drivers' safety.
Update: they're driving over the line.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should watch out for other drivers' safety.
Update: You are driving during a natural disaster.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should watch out for other drivers' safety.
Update: You are driving in a school zone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should watch out for other drivers' safety.
Update: you are a ambulance driver rushing to an emergency.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should watch out for other drivers' safety.
Update: you just recently got your drivers license.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should watch out for other drivers' safety.
Update: You're in a demolition derby.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should watch out for other drivers' safety.
Update: You are in heavy traffic.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to expect to be compensated for your work.
Update: the quality of your work is poor and sloppy
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to expect to be compensated for your work.
Update: the quality of your work is excellent
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to expect to be compensated for your work.
Update: you've agreed to work pro bono
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to expect to be compensated for your work.
Update: the work you've done is at a traditional for profit company
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to expect to be compensated for your work.
Update: You are working for a charity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to expect to be compensated for your work.
Update: You are working for a company.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to expect to be compensated for your work.
Update: You are doing charity work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to expect to be compensated for your work.
Update: You have signed a contract that states it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to expect to be compensated for your work.
Update: you don't do a good job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to expect to be compensated for your work.
Update: you do a fantastic job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't scare people.
Update: you are running a haunted house for Halloween.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't scare people.
Update: they have heart problems.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't scare people.
Update: It is Halloween.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't scare people.
Update: The person has a heart condition.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't scare people.
Update: you work in a haunted house.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't scare people.
Update: people are easily startled.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't scare people.
Update: It's Halloween time and such things are standard.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't scare people.
Update: They have a weak heart.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't scare people.
Update: You are being paid to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't scare people.
Update: You are collaborating in a team.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to see other people.
Update: you are in a committed relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to see other people.
Update: you are single.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to see other people.
Update: You are married
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to see other people.
Update: You are no longer in love with the person
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to see other people.
Update: You are contractually obligated to only see one person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to see other people.
Update: Both parties agree on an open relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to see other people.
Update: you are married with children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to see other people.
Update: you are in an open relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to see other people.
Update: You are married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to see other people.
Update: You are in high school.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if your hungry to eat what is available to you.
Update: someone asks you not to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if your hungry to eat what is available to you.
Update: it is offered to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if your hungry to eat what is available to you.
Update: You are still waiting for other guests to arrive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if your hungry to eat what is available to you.
Update: The food has been specially prepared for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if your hungry to eat what is available to you.
Update: you are allergic to the food.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if your hungry to eat what is available to you.
Update: you haven't eaten all day.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if your hungry to eat what is available to you.
Update: It is someone's lunch.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if your hungry to eat what is available to you.
Update: Your mother cooked it for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if your hungry to eat what is available to you.
Update: The food is moldy and spoiled.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if your hungry to eat what is available to you.
Update: You are snowed in for the weekend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to push your ideas on others.
Update: your idea may save another person's life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to push your ideas on others.
Update: you have been told to keep your opinions to yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to push your ideas on others.
Update: They are your young children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to push your ideas on others.
Update: They are being independent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to push your ideas on others.
Update: you are certain that you are correct.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to push your ideas on others.
Update: you are talking about politics.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to push your ideas on others.
Update: Your ideas will keep someome from harm.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to push your ideas on others.
Update: Your ideas involve hurting others either physically or emotionally.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to push your ideas on others.
Update: those ideas are de facto useful and worth hearing
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to push your ideas on others.
Update: your ideas are irrelevant and not of use to the others
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is of bad taste to discuss Nazi symbols.
Update: you are in history class.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is of bad taste to discuss Nazi symbols.
Update: you are at a bar mitzfah.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is of bad taste to discuss Nazi symbols.
Update: it is in a history class.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is of bad taste to discuss Nazi symbols.
Update: there are Holocaust survivors present.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is of bad taste to discuss Nazi symbols.
Update: it is in an academic context.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is of bad taste to discuss Nazi symbols.
Update: you are saying they are acceptable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is of bad taste to discuss Nazi symbols.
Update: you are a history teacher.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is of bad taste to discuss Nazi symbols.
Update: you are at a political rally.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is of bad taste to discuss Nazi symbols.
Update: You are learning about them as part of history class.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is of bad taste to discuss Nazi symbols.
Update: You are using them to spread hate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to put up a public service announcement warning people not to do something.
Update: the announcement is repetitive and irrelevant to the people
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to put up a public service announcement warning people not to do something.
Update: the people are in a high risk situation and need to be warned
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to put up a public service announcement warning people not to do something.
Update: It infringes upon their rights.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to put up a public service announcement warning people not to do something.
Update: It will help save lives.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to put up a public service announcement warning people not to do something.
Update: You're prohibiting something that contributes to overall health.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to put up a public service announcement warning people not to do something.
Update: You're warning against something that's especially toxic.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to put up a public service announcement warning people not to do something.
Update: You're exaggerating the warning.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to put up a public service announcement warning people not to do something.
Update: It can endanger the lives of the public.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to put up a public service announcement warning people not to do something.
Update: the warning isnt based on anything real.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to put up a public service announcement warning people not to do something.
Update: it's a serious public hazard
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you would be upset if someone excluded you because you have special needs.
Update: It was a dangerous activity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you would be upset if someone excluded you because you have special needs.
Update: They make fun of you because of your special needs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you would be upset if someone excluded you because you have special needs.
Update: you have said in the past that you really don't like that activity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you would be upset if someone excluded you because you have special needs.
Update: they did so just to be mean.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you would be upset if someone excluded you because you have special needs.
Update: It would be too dangerous to include you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you would be upset if someone excluded you because you have special needs.
Update: It is something you are capable of doing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you would be upset if someone excluded you because you have special needs.
Update: those special needs make it impossible to complete the task
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you would be upset if someone excluded you because you have special needs.
Update: they are just assuming that you can't do something due to the special needs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you would be upset if someone excluded you because you have special needs.
Update: They only excluded you because they're embarrassed to be seen with someone with a disability.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you would be upset if someone excluded you because you have special needs.
Update: You paid to be part of an activity.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When you misbehave, you should expect people to look at you differently.
Update: Unless all the people around you are doing the same thing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When you misbehave, you should expect people to look at you differently.
Update: Nobody else is doing the same thing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When you misbehave, you should expect people to look at you differently.
Update: others are misbehaving in the same way as you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When you misbehave, you should expect people to look at you differently.
Update: you are in church
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When you misbehave, you should expect people to look at you differently.
Update: You are a child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When you misbehave, you should expect people to look at you differently.
Update: You are at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When you misbehave, you should expect people to look at you differently.
Update: they understand that you are hangry.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When you misbehave, you should expect people to look at you differently.
Update: your behavior is hurtful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When you misbehave, you should expect people to look at you differently.
Update: You are a child learning new things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't discriminate against people with mental problems.
Update: you care about people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't discriminate against people with mental problems.
Update: They have applied for a job as a Police Officer.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't discriminate against people with mental problems.
Update: They are getting treatment for their condition.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't discriminate against people with mental problems.
Update: It would be a safety issue.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't discriminate against people with mental problems.
Update: They are doing their best.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't discriminate against people with mental problems.
Update: You are recruiting soldiers for a war.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't discriminate against people with mental problems.
Update: You are signing people up for church.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't discriminate against people with mental problems.
Update: Someone is using a mental problem to take advantage of people
Update type: weakener