tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be disrespectful to someone or not care about things that happened to them.
Update: They are at least partly decent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be disrespectful to someone or not care about things that happened to them.
Update: They are taking advantage of your sympathies.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be disrespectful to someone or not care about things that happened to them.
Update: They are a corrupt politician.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be disrespectful to someone or not care about things that happened to them.
Update: They are your own family members.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be disrespectful to someone or not care about things that happened to them.
Update: They are a bad person who hurts others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be disrespectful to someone or not care about things that happened to them.
Update: You are responsible for the care of that person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect a partner to attend your doctors appointments with you.
Update: They are deployed overseas with the military.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect a partner to attend your doctors appointments with you.
Update: You are undergoing a procedure where you can't drive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect a partner to attend your doctors appointments with you.
Update: They are sick with the flu.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect a partner to attend your doctors appointments with you.
Update: you are pregnant.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect a partner to attend your doctors appointments with you.
Update: It is a routine checkup and you don't need a ride.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect a partner to attend your doctors appointments with you.
Update: It is for a serious medical matter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect a partner to attend your doctors appointments with you.
Update: they are afraid of doctors.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect a partner to attend your doctors appointments with you.
Update: they are your medical advocate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect a partner to attend your doctors appointments with you.
Update: they have to work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect a partner to attend your doctors appointments with you.
Update: They have free time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is always proper to tip for food.
Update: you're in a country that doesn't tip.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is always proper to tip for food.
Update: you are in the United States.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is always proper to tip for food.
Update: You are in a country where tipping is considered rood.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is always proper to tip for food.
Update: The server went above and beyond.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is always proper to tip for food.
Update: The service and the food was bad.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is always proper to tip for food.
Update: The service person depends on the tips and not their wages.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is always proper to tip for food.
Update: The service is terrible
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is always proper to tip for food.
Update: The waiter is kind and always helps you out
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is always proper to tip for food.
Update: You had terrible service.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is always proper to tip for food.
Update: You drank a lot of alcohol and had a big bill.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to be attracted to certain people.
Update: Your reasons for doing so are bigoted or extremely petty.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to be attracted to certain people.
Update: The certain people are morally bad.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to be attracted to certain people.
Update: They are your wives and you are into polygamy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to be attracted to certain people.
Update: You are confident in your own ability to know what you find attractive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to be attracted to certain people.
Update: Certain people can help you in your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to be attracted to certain people.
Update: Certain people are criminals.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to be attracted to certain people.
Update: They have acne
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to be attracted to certain people.
Update: they are family members
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to be attracted to certain people.
Update: they are cruel to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to end friendships when your interests change.
Update: Your friends need your support and care.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to end friendships when your interests change.
Update: The friendship is no longer supportive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to end friendships when your interests change.
Update: You are going to be living with them for the foreseeable future.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to end friendships when your interests change.
Update: They start doing hard drugs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to end friendships when your interests change.
Update: You've known the person since childhood.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to end friendships when your interests change.
Update: You are not close to the person anymore.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to end friendships when your interests change.
Update: You can still find a way to have fun even with different interests.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to end friendships when your interests change.
Update: The friends interests are toxic and can make your life bad.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to end friendships when your interests change.
Update: Your friendship is based on more then interests.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to end friendships when your interests change.
Update: Your friendship was based on a love of the same thing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to judge others.
Update: You are the judge in a courtroom.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to judge others.
Update: You don't know all of the circumstances of their life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to judge others.
Update: They've committed especially horrific crimes, like pedophilia.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to judge others.
Update: You have the same weaknesses you're judging them for.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to judge others.
Update: you are the judge at a dance competition.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to judge others.
Update: you are just being a gossip.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to judge others.
Update: You are a judge
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to judge others.
Update: You are not looking at all the whole picture
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to judge others.
Update: You're in a courtroom and are punishing the defendant for a terrible crime.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to judge others.
Update: You yourself have many of the same faults you're judging.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should tip a server unless they provided poor service.
Update: You are dining with others and they agree to pay the tip if you cover the cost of the meal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should tip a server unless they provided poor service.
Update: You can see they were overworked and couldn't give you the service they would have at another time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should tip a server unless they provided poor service.
Update: You can’t afford it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should tip a server unless they provided poor service.
Update: The server does their job really well
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should tip a server unless they provided poor service.
Update: The tip is already included in the cost of the meal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should tip a server unless they provided poor service.
Update: The server worked hard to take care of you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should tip a server unless they provided poor service.
Update: You always tip regardless of the quality
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should tip a server unless they provided poor service.
Update: The server provided especially poor service
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should tip a server unless they provided poor service.
Update: They're in a country without a tip system.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should tip a server unless they provided poor service.
Update: The restaurant is very busy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to use sex to get somebody to care about you.
Update: You're a sex worker.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to use sex to get somebody to care about you.
Update: You're trying to get the person to be in a relationship with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to use sex to get somebody to care about you.
Update: You feel a mutual sexual attraction.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to use sex to get somebody to care about you.
Update: Their sexual orientation isn't compatible with your gender.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to use sex to get somebody to care about you.
Update: That is the only thing they want from you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to use sex to get somebody to care about you.
Update: They want to be in a commited relationship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have difficulty in paying a bill.
Update: You have been spending money on luxuries.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have difficulty in paying a bill.
Update: The bill is unexpected, like a traffic ticket.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have difficulty in paying a bill.
Update: You were not charged the price advertised.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have difficulty in paying a bill.
Update: You are underemployed and underpaid.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have difficulty in paying a bill.
Update: You have used all of your money in a gambling game.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have difficulty in paying a bill.
Update: Your boss has been cutting your hours and not paying you enough.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have difficulty in paying a bill.
Update: You've been wasting money on eating out every night.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have difficulty in paying a bill.
Update: Your hours were unexpectedly cut.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have difficulty in paying a bill.
Update: You make over 100,000 a year
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have difficulty in paying a bill.
Update: You make minimum wage
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable if you don't like some of your significant other's friends.
Update: The other person is very nice and supportive of your significant other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable if you don't like some of your significant other's friends.
Update: Your significant other's friends are loud and obnoxious.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable if you don't like some of your significant other's friends.
Update: Your friends asked you to try and get along with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable if you don't like some of your significant other's friends.
Update: You and your friends are constantly hanging out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable if you don't like some of your significant other's friends.
Update: They are very polite and well behaved.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable if you don't like some of your significant other's friends.
Update: They are loud, obnoxious, or alcoholics.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable if you don't like some of your significant other's friends.
Update: They are always nice to you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable if you don't like some of your significant other's friends.
Update: They say mean things to you all the time
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable if you don't like some of your significant other's friends.
Update: It's rooted in jealousy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable if you don't like some of your significant other's friends.
Update: They are rude and unpleasant.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should talk to your partner about things you don't want to do.
Update: Talking to your partner would put a strain on your relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should talk to your partner about things you don't want to do.
Update: Talking to your partner would strengthen your relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should talk to your partner about things you don't want to do.
Update: it is their birthday.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should talk to your partner about things you don't want to do.
Update: you want to build a strong relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should talk to your partner about things you don't want to do.
Update: Your partner is a quadriplegic and couldn't do them with you anyway like run a marathon or do 1000 squats thrusts.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should talk to your partner about things you don't want to do.
Update: You and your partner decide to be in an open or swinging relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should talk to your partner about things you don't want to do.
Update: It is something that the other person really likes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should talk to your partner about things you don't want to do.
Update: It is something dangerous.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should talk to your partner about things you don't want to do.
Update: Your partner is not someone you can speak to safely.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should talk to your partner about things you don't want to do.
Update: They are things your partner wants you to do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cause others to get injured.
Update: It is to prevent them from being killed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cause others to get injured.
Update: You can avoid causing the injury.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cause others to get injured.
Update: You are slide tackling an opponent in soccer and it was an accident
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cause others to get injured.
Update: You know how to play the game without hurting people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cause others to get injured.
Update: You're a professional fighter.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cause others to get injured.
Update: You're a doctor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cause others to get injured.
Update: They are trying to stab you with a knife.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cause others to get injured.
Update: They are your team mates.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cause others to get injured.
Update: You chose to hurt one person instead of five because you were in a real life trolley problem.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cause others to get injured.
Update: You don't want to go to jail.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When you have a crush on someone, it's okay to approach them.
Update: You are very drunk and out of order
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When you have a crush on someone, it's okay to approach them.
Update: They are making eyes at you across the room
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When you have a crush on someone, it's okay to approach them.
Update: they are already married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When you have a crush on someone, it's okay to approach them.
Update: they smiled at you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When you have a crush on someone, it's okay to approach them.
Update: They're already happily dating someone else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When you have a crush on someone, it's okay to approach them.
Update: They're single and drop hints that they're interested in you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When you have a crush on someone, it's okay to approach them.
Update: They have a girlfriend or boyfriend.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When you have a crush on someone, it's okay to approach them.
Update: They are single.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When you have a crush on someone, it's okay to approach them.
Update: You're the person's teacher.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When you have a crush on someone, it's okay to approach them.
Update: You're in the same grade as the person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should like your child's gift even if it's the wrong one.
Update: they ate all the candy in the box.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should like your child's gift even if it's the wrong one.
Update: they made it themselves.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should like your child's gift even if it's the wrong one.
Update: they wasted the money on themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should like your child's gift even if it's the wrong one.
Update: they put a lot of thought into the gift.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should like your child's gift even if it's the wrong one.
Update: Your kid made the gift by hand
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should like your child's gift even if it's the wrong one.
Update: It's an obscene gift.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should like your child's gift even if it's the wrong one.
Update: Your child is a toddler.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should like your child's gift even if it's the wrong one.
Update: You're allergic to the gift.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should like your child's gift even if it's the wrong one.
Update: The gift is a decoration.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk things over with your boss.
Update: It is about a surprise party for your boss that your coworkers are planning.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk things over with your boss.
Update: There is a situation happening with another coworker that needs to be brought to the boss' attention.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk things over with your boss.
Update: your boss is undermining you at work
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk things over with your boss.
Update: your boss is your mentor
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk things over with your boss.
Update: Your boss berates you for his own mistakes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk things over with your boss.
Update: You need to clear the air and get on the same page as your boss.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk things over with your boss.
Update: Your boss is in a meeting.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk things over with your boss.
Update: Your boss has an open door.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk things over with your boss.
Update: You've stolen money from your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk things over with your boss.
Update: Your job misunderstood why you did something.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's allowed for the government to make regulations on how and when people are paid.
Update: The people never get paid on time
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's allowed for the government to make regulations on how and when people are paid.
Update: The people always get their money when they need it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's allowed for the government to make regulations on how and when people are paid.
Update: The society is very large
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's allowed for the government to make regulations on how and when people are paid.
Update: you are a union member.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's allowed for the government to make regulations on how and when people are paid.
Update: employers try to underpay employees.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's allowed for the government to make regulations on how and when people are paid.
Update: You are being paid cash for mowing the lawn.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's allowed for the government to make regulations on how and when people are paid.
Update: You have to pay taxes on your paycheck.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's allowed for the government to make regulations on how and when people are paid.
Update: Those regulations would absolutely cripple the economy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's allowed for the government to make regulations on how and when people are paid.
Update: The new regulations prevent serious abuse of the workers.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask your partner to contribute around the house.
Update: Your partner is sick.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask your partner to contribute around the house.
Update: They have a lot of free time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask your partner to contribute around the house.
Update: They have been working all night.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask your partner to contribute around the house.
Update: They have the day off.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask your partner to contribute around the house.
Update: They work eighty hours a week and you work twenty.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask your partner to contribute around the house.
Update: You work sixty hours a week and they work twenty.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask your partner to contribute around the house.
Update: Your partner is severely injured and bedridden.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask your partner to contribute around the house.
Update: They have more time off of work than you do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask your partner to contribute around the house.
Update: They are incapacitated.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask your partner to contribute around the house.
Update: They are able to help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to throw away things that don't belong to you.
Update: the owner told you to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to throw away things that don't belong to you.
Update: they are expensive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to throw away things that don't belong to you.
Update: You're throwing away someone's illegal drugs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to throw away things that don't belong to you.
Update: You're at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to throw away things that don't belong to you.
Update: There is expired food in the fridge.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to throw away things that don't belong to you.
Update: They are clearly marked as someone else's property.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to throw away things that don't belong to you.
Update: you have bought them a replacement.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to throw away things that don't belong to you.
Update: they have asked for it back.
Update type: strengthener