tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's bad to accuse someone of cheating without evidence.
Update: You think they're cheating because of a dream you had.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to accuse someone of cheating without evidence.
Update: The evidence was destroyed or not recorded but you are certain of the cheating.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to accuse someone of cheating without evidence.
Update: You're only relying on hearsay and the alleged perpetrator has a clear record.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to accuse someone of cheating without evidence.
Update: They have cheated in the past.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to accuse someone of cheating without evidence.
Update: They have always appeared trustworthy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to accuse someone of cheating without evidence.
Update: They are known to do things like that.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to accuse someone of cheating without evidence.
Update: Their outcome wasn't excellent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to accuse someone of cheating without evidence.
Update: They have cheated on you before
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to accuse someone of cheating without evidence.
Update: They swear they didn’t do anything wrong
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Proper work out wear is important.
Update: You are okay getting your nicer clothes sweaty.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Proper work out wear is important.
Update: You sweat easily.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Proper work out wear is important.
Update: you aren't wearing it to actually work out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Proper work out wear is important.
Update: you are going to go through a strenuous workout.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Proper work out wear is important.
Update: It is cold outside and you need to dress in a coat.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Proper work out wear is important.
Update: You are going to work out at the gym.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Proper work out wear is important.
Update: you don't own any.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Proper work out wear is important.
Update: you are doing complicated workouts.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Proper work out wear is important.
Update: You are walking for exercise and wearing normal clothes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Proper work out wear is important.
Update: You are in a gym and sweat a lot.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at a friend for sabotaging your job prospects.
Update: Your friend was trying to save you from a terrible job at a place where they used to work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at a friend for sabotaging your job prospects.
Update: They stole a job for themselves.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at a friend for sabotaging your job prospects.
Update: they were successful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at a friend for sabotaging your job prospects.
Update: The friend didn't realize you applied for the same job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at a friend for sabotaging your job prospects.
Update: The friend knew you were going to applied and sent in their resume first.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at a friend for sabotaging your job prospects.
Update: The job is a bad fit for you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at a friend for sabotaging your job prospects.
Update: They did it to get the job themselves.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at a friend for sabotaging your job prospects.
Update: They have offered a better opportunity to replace them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at a friend for sabotaging your job prospects.
Update: They took the job themselves.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to use alcohol in moderation,
Update: You are a recovering alcoholic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to use alcohol in moderation,
Update: You only drink when you go out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to use alcohol in moderation,
Update: You have a bad liver.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to use alcohol in moderation,
Update: You are a professional wine taster.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to use alcohol in moderation,
Update: you are a recovering alcoholic
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to use alcohol in moderation,
Update: all of your responsibilities are taken care of already
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to use alcohol in moderation,
Update: Your religion forbids the consumption of alcohol or you have a bad liver.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to use alcohol in moderation,
Update: You are being served champagne at a social event.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to use alcohol in moderation,
Update: You are in a state that is illegal
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to use alcohol in moderation,
Update: You use it for a medical condition
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to drive when you're impaired in any way.
Update: You have an emergency where life is at stake.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to drive when you're impaired in any way.
Update: You don't need to drive and just want to for fun.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to drive when you're impaired in any way.
Update: It is to save someone's life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to drive when you're impaired in any way.
Update: There is another option.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to drive when you're impaired in any way.
Update: You must escape a volcano.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to drive when you're impaired in any way.
Update: You have children in the car.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to drive when you're impaired in any way.
Update: You are only slightly impaired such as a BAC of 0.01.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to drive when you're impaired in any way.
Update: You have had a lot to drink.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to drive when you're impaired in any way.
Update: it's into a ball pit
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to drive when you're impaired in any way.
Update: it's night.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to cause someone else pain.
Update: you are defending your children from an attacker.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to cause someone else pain.
Update: they are peaceful and kind.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to cause someone else pain.
Update: The pain is part of a necessary procedure.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to cause someone else pain.
Update: You're causing them pain because you hate their entire race.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to cause someone else pain.
Update: You are pulling out a splinter.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to cause someone else pain.
Update: It leaves bruising.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to cause someone else pain.
Update: You have to hurt one person to save many others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to cause someone else pain.
Update: You're going out of your way to hurt them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to cause someone else pain.
Update: you are a surgeon.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to cause someone else pain.
Update: you are a dentist.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone conceited.
Update: You want them to change their actions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone conceited.
Update: They are sensitive to insults.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone conceited.
Update: Unless you're trying to describe a conceited person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone conceited.
Update: Especially if they are trying to help you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone conceited.
Update: You want to make them aware of how they come off
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone conceited.
Update: You want to be friends with them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone conceited.
Update: They have been a snob to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone conceited.
Update: They have been nice to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone conceited.
Update: It is someone  you care about and are trying to give constructive criticism to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone conceited.
Update: You don't know them and all the circumstances surrounding their demeanor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report bad behavior to your employers.
Update: it is inconsequential
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report bad behavior to your employers.
Update: it involves dishonesty
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report bad behavior to your employers.
Update: You are causing the bad behavior.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report bad behavior to your employers.
Update: It could cause someone to get hurt.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report bad behavior to your employers.
Update: reporting it would cause more harm than good.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report bad behavior to your employers.
Update: the company's reputation can be damaged.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report bad behavior to your employers.
Update: You only heard about the bad behavior and not seen it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report bad behavior to your employers.
Update: Another person is harmed in anyway.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report bad behavior to your employers.
Update: You are afraid your coworker will be fired.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report bad behavior to your employers.
Update: Your coworkers are endangering others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to call the police over disturbances.
Update: The disturbances are civil and not criminal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to call the police over disturbances.
Update: Someone is in danger of being hurt.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to call the police over disturbances.
Update: You know that it is because of a football game on the TV.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to call the police over disturbances.
Update: You hear crashes followed by screaming.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to call the police over disturbances.
Update: You're calling for a noise disturbance during the day.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to call the police over disturbances.
Update: The neighbors are having a loud party late at night.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to call the police over disturbances.
Update: It is just kids playing a game outside
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to call the police over disturbances.
Update: You think you are in danger
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to call the police over disturbances.
Update: The police in your area are more dangerous than the civilians.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to call the police over disturbances.
Update: The disturbance seems violent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be really busy.
Update: You are neglecting your responsibilities.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be really busy.
Update: You need to work to pay the rent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be really busy.
Update: You're on vacation with your partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be really busy.
Update: You're at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be really busy.
Update: Unless you're pretending to be busy to avoid someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be really busy.
Update: Especially if you have a lot to do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be really busy.
Update: You have to take your kids to the doctors.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be really busy.
Update: You get paid for your time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be really busy.
Update: You are missing your children growing up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be really busy.
Update: It's not affecting your personal life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to walk away from hostile situations.
Update: You are a hostage negotiator.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to walk away from hostile situations.
Update: You are in danger as a passerby.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to walk away from hostile situations.
Update: Your partner wants to make up with you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to walk away from hostile situations.
Update: You are being abused
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to walk away from hostile situations.
Update: you are a policeman.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to walk away from hostile situations.
Update: you are in danger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to walk away from hostile situations.
Update: You're a cop who's trying to save innocent hostages.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to walk away from hostile situations.
Update: You haven't been trained on how to deal with those situations.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to walk away from hostile situations.
Update: you are in a dark alley and being followed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to walk away from hostile situations.
Update: you want to avoid confrontation with a coworker.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that in the event of someone's death you inform others who would want to know.
Update: You aren't close to that person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that in the event of someone's death you inform others who would want to know.
Update: You were close friends to the person that died.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that in the event of someone's death you inform others who would want to know.
Update: You actually killed the person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that in the event of someone's death you inform others who would want to know.
Update: You know that everyone you know loved the person
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that in the event of someone's death you inform others who would want to know.
Update: That person was a hermit and doesn't have any significant relationships.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that in the event of someone's death you inform others who would want to know.
Update: Their family is anxiously waiting to be updated on their status.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that in the event of someone's death you inform others who would want to know.
Update: Someone has already done so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that in the event of someone's death you inform others who would want to know.
Update: You're the only one who has their contact information.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that in the event of someone's death you inform others who would want to know.
Update: The person who died is a celebrity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that in the event of someone's death you inform others who would want to know.
Update: The person who died is a your own family member or friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to reconnect with family.
Update: Your family has put a restraining order against you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to reconnect with family.
Update: You had to move away from them for work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to reconnect with family.
Update: Your family says they want nothing to do with you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to reconnect with family.
Update: You really miss them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to reconnect with family.
Update: They were always toxic people
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to reconnect with family.
Update: They want to reconnect too
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to reconnect with family.
Update: You were abusive to that family in the past.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to reconnect with family.
Update: They are a long lost relative.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to reconnect with family.
Update: Your family has disowned you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to reconnect with family.
Update: You live across the country and travel back to visit.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to suddenly break off contact with someone you care about.
Update: You are immediately detained after a surprise ICE raid.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to suddenly break off contact with someone you care about.
Update: You are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to suddenly break off contact with someone you care about.
Update: They threaten to kill you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to suddenly break off contact with someone you care about.
Update: They just found out their father has cancer.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to suddenly break off contact with someone you care about.
Update: You have been kidnapped.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to suddenly break off contact with someone you care about.
Update: There is no good reason to break off contact.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to suddenly break off contact with someone you care about.
Update: they are being cruel to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to suddenly break off contact with someone you care about.
Update: they depend on you for support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to suddenly break off contact with someone you care about.
Update: They were hurtful toward you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to suddenly break off contact with someone you care about.
Update: You owe them money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to decline a shift at work.
Update: you really need the money or the work really needs you to go in
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to decline a shift at work.
Update: you had plans for your off day
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to decline a shift at work.
Update: You are behind on paying bills
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to decline a shift at work.
Update: You have worked 80 hours this week
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to decline a shift at work.
Update: it is a required shift.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to decline a shift at work.
Update: you need time to recover and sleep.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to decline a shift at work.
Update: You really need the money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to decline a shift at work.
Update: You are sick.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to decline a shift at work.
Update: You are really needed
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to decline a shift at work.
Update: You've been working over-time
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to litter.
Update: There is a trash can nearby.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to litter.
Update: You are performing a social experiment in public
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to litter.
Update: Animals could get killed by your litter
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to litter.
Update: you intend on picking it up right away.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to litter.
Update: you don't pick it up.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to litter.
Update: unless you are staging a scene and will clean it later.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to litter.
Update: in a beautiful place.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to litter.
Update: You only dropped the litter accidentally and without notice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to litter.
Update: You throw litter out of your car while driving.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to date who you want
Update: The person you want to date is in a relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to date who you want
Update: The person you want to date also wants to date you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to date who you want
Update: You are already in a relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to date who you want
Update: The other person wants to date you back.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to date who you want
Update: The other person is married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to date who you want
Update: Your are single and responsible.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to date who you want
Update: They do not want to date you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to date who you want
Update: You are a grown adult.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to date who you want
Update: You want to date someone who went to jail for murdering their previous lover.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to date who you want
Update: They're a loving, gentle person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to not tell every little detail to your significant other.
Update: you have agreed to a tell-all relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to not tell every little detail to your significant other.
Update: the little details have no impact on anything whatsoever.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to not tell every little detail to your significant other.
Update: You have been diagnosed with cancer and your significant other needs to know what is going to happen to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to not tell every little detail to your significant other.
Update: Your significant other is new in your life and you aren't sure if the relationship will work out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to not tell every little detail to your significant other.
Update: you are trying to be honest together because you cheated
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to not tell every little detail to your significant other.
Update: you both live busy lives and need to savor your time together
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to not tell every little detail to your significant other.
Update: You are hiding something important.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to not tell every little detail to your significant other.
Update: They would be bored by the details.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to not tell every little detail to your significant other.
Update: it is something they specifically asked for.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to not tell every little detail to your significant other.
Update: they are very busy,
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to pretend to be interested in someone when you are not.
Update: you are still open to seeing if your feelings will change.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to pretend to be interested in someone when you are not.
Update: they have strong feelings for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to pretend to be interested in someone when you are not.
Update: It's for a movie.
Update type: weakener