tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: You should always ask the input of someone you live with before bringing something into the house.
Update: It's a snack you're going to eat in private.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always ask the input of someone you live with before bringing something into the house.
Update: It's a pet they'll have to help take care of.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always ask the input of someone you live with before bringing something into the house.
Update: It is an emergency.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always ask the input of someone you live with before bringing something into the house.
Update: It is a living thing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always ask the input of someone you live with before bringing something into the house.
Update: You own the house.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always ask the input of someone you live with before bringing something into the house.
Update: You share the rent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always ask the input of someone you live with before bringing something into the house.
Update: The something in question is groceries.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always ask the input of someone you live with before bringing something into the house.
Update: Someone has a food allergy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always ask the input of someone you live with before bringing something into the house.
Update: They're never home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always ask the input of someone you live with before bringing something into the house.
Update: It takes up a great deal of space.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Its hypocritical to criticize someone for a bad habit when you also have the same habit.
Update: you're trying to get rid of the habit yourself
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Its hypocritical to criticize someone for a bad habit when you also have the same habit.
Update: they are suffering from the habit
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Its hypocritical to criticize someone for a bad habit when you also have the same habit.
Update: You are trying to protect them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Its hypocritical to criticize someone for a bad habit when you also have the same habit.
Update: you do it in front of them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Its hypocritical to criticize someone for a bad habit when you also have the same habit.
Update: You are trying to get them to stop since you know how bad of a habit it is.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Its hypocritical to criticize someone for a bad habit when you also have the same habit.
Update: It is a young child and they think it is okay since they see that you are doing it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Its hypocritical to criticize someone for a bad habit when you also have the same habit.
Update: You are trying to keep someone else safe.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Its hypocritical to criticize someone for a bad habit when you also have the same habit.
Update: They learned the bad habit from you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Its hypocritical to criticize someone for a bad habit when you also have the same habit.
Update: you are actively trying to break the habit.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Its hypocritical to criticize someone for a bad habit when you also have the same habit.
Update: have  no intention of changing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to openly communicate with your significant other.
Update: Your significant other ran off with another person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to openly communicate with your significant other.
Update: You want to show that you care for their opinion.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to openly communicate with your significant other.
Update: Your significant other is violent and abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to openly communicate with your significant other.
Update: Your significant other is living far away from you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to openly communicate with your significant other.
Update: You want your relationship to last
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to openly communicate with your significant other.
Update: you work for the CIA
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to openly communicate with your significant other.
Update: you want to develop a strong relationship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to openly communicate with your significant other.
Update: you want to have a good relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to save something you have for later even  others want it.
Update: The others are in great need.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to save something you have for later even  others want it.
Update: They don't have any right to it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to save something you have for later even  others want it.
Update: it could help someone in trouble.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to save something you have for later even  others want it.
Update: it is a "special occasion" item.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to save something you have for later even  others want it.
Update: Other people paid for it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to save something you have for later even  others want it.
Update: They are leftovers from a big meal you paid for.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to save something you have for later even  others want it.
Update: The item doesn't belong to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to save something you have for later even  others want it.
Update: The item was given to you first.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to save something you have for later even  others want it.
Update: It could save their lives.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to save something you have for later even  others want it.
Update: You are rationing supplies.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be part of your child's life.
Update: You gave your child up in a closed adoption.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to be part of your child's life.
Update: You are raising the child in your own home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be part of your child's life.
Update: You are a drug addict in active addiction.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to be part of your child's life.
Update: You want a good relationship with your child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be part of your child's life.
Update: You have been disallowed from seeing your child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to be part of your child's life.
Update: You have time and resources to spend with your child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be part of your child's life.
Update: They have left for the college experience.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to be part of your child's life.
Update: They look to you for guidance and support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be part of your child's life.
Update: you cause your child emotional pain.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to be part of your child's life.
Update: you care about them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want out of a stressful work situation.
Update: It's due to your bad performance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want out of a stressful work situation.
Update: Your boss is very hard to work with.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want out of a stressful work situation.
Update: You can't get another job where you live.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want out of a stressful work situation.
Update: You have other choices.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want out of a stressful work situation.
Update: You have to make a decision quickly to save the company.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want out of a stressful work situation.
Update: That situation isn't part of your normal job responsibilities.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want out of a stressful work situation.
Update: you are being paid very well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want out of a stressful work situation.
Update: you are not getting paid well enough.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want out of a stressful work situation.
Update: Your boss is depending on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want out of a stressful work situation.
Update: Your health is being harmed by overwork.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Abandoning those close to you makes you appear cold.
Update: Those close to you were toxic and abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Abandoning those close to you makes you appear cold.
Update: It includes your children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Abandoning those close to you makes you appear cold.
Update: You are unable to provide for them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Abandoning those close to you makes you appear cold.
Update: They rely on you to provide for them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Abandoning those close to you makes you appear cold.
Update: They were toxic and destructive to your life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Abandoning those close to you makes you appear cold.
Update: You did it for selfish reasons.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Abandoning those close to you makes you appear cold.
Update: You don't want to get caught up in their toxic behavior and schemes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Abandoning those close to you makes you appear cold.
Update: They are unable to fend for themselves.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Abandoning those close to you makes you appear cold.
Update: The person you are close to betrayed you in some way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Abandoning those close to you makes you appear cold.
Update: You have been good friends with each other for several years.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get people fired.
Update: They are stealing from coworkers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get people fired.
Update: You lie about them to management.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get people fired.
Update: they are a danger to other employees.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get people fired.
Update: they are hard working and honest.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get people fired.
Update: they were doing something that broke company policy
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get people fired.
Update: they're a great asset to the company they work for
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get people fired.
Update: They are racist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get people fired.
Update: They have done nothing wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get people fired.
Update: Their incompetence negatively affects colleagues and/or business.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get people fired.
Update: Their job performance exceeds expectations.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should control your anger when you are in a public setting.
Update: You see someone trying to kidnap a child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should control your anger when you are in a public setting.
Update: You are fighting with your spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should control your anger when you are in a public setting.
Update: You see an authority figure treating someone else badly for no reason.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should control your anger when you are in a public setting.
Update: You are part of a passive protest.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should control your anger when you are in a public setting.
Update: You are in a boxing match.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should control your anger when you are in a public setting.
Update: You are around children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should control your anger when you are in a public setting.
Update: You are a boxer during a match.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should control your anger when you are in a public setting.
Update: You are interacting with the police.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should control your anger when you are in a public setting.
Update: Someone punched you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should control your anger when you are in a public setting.
Update: There are cops around
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone who already has a significant other.
Update: You are in an open relationship
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone who already has a significant other.
Update: Their partner would want to hurt you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone who already has a significant other.
Update: they are separated and waiting to finalize a divorce.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone who already has a significant other.
Update: you are doing it behind their spouses back.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone who already has a significant other.
Update: they are planning to break up with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone who already has a significant other.
Update: you are friends with their significant other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone who already has a significant other.
Update: They have a polyamorous agreement.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone who already has a significant other.
Update: They are a monogamous couple.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone who already has a significant other.
Update: They are in an open relationship and you are ok with it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone who already has a significant other.
Update: They are legally married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be frustrated by other people.
Update: They are just trying to give you advice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be frustrated by other people.
Update: They seem to be trying to annoy you on purpose.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be frustrated by other people.
Update: You work with young children
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be frustrated by other people.
Update: You are always being annoying
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be frustrated by other people.
Update: You are trying to get work done
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be frustrated by other people.
Update: You're teaching a class on anger management.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be frustrated by other people.
Update: You're having a political debate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be frustrated by other people.
Update: You are a fiction writer working from home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be frustrated by other people.
Update: You deal with the public directly through your work at a library.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to drive the speed limit in a treacherous area.
Update: You have an emergency and are trying to get to the ER.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to drive the speed limit in a treacherous area.
Update: It is also raining.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to drive the speed limit in a treacherous area.
Update: You are rushing a person to the hospital and time is of the essence.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to drive the speed limit in a treacherous area.
Update: The brakes on your car are going bad.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to drive the speed limit in a treacherous area.
Update: It's sleeting, in which case you should drive slower.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to drive the speed limit in a treacherous area.
Update: There's lots of traffic on the road.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to drive the speed limit in a treacherous area.
Update: Your wife is in labor with you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to drive the speed limit in a treacherous area.
Update: The weather conditions are poor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to drive the speed limit in a treacherous area.
Update: someone is pursuing you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to drive the speed limit in a treacherous area.
Update: you are unfamiliar with the area you are driving.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected to respond politely when you are invited to a meal.
Update: you have a previous commitment.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected to respond politely when you are invited to a meal.
Update: you are new to the area.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected to respond politely when you are invited to a meal.
Update: the person only invited you as a prank
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected to respond politely when you are invited to a meal.
Update: the invitation was sent formally
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected to respond politely when you are invited to a meal.
Update: you are rudely invited.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected to respond politely when you are invited to a meal.
Update: the invitation is pleasantly delivered.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected to respond politely when you are invited to a meal.
Update: the invitation was a generic one you got in your spam folder
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected to respond politely when you are invited to a meal.
Update: you are invited by poor people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected to respond politely when you are invited to a meal.
Update: The meal is your last meal on death row.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected to respond politely when you are invited to a meal.
Update: It is a work dinner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should spend more time with your partner.
Update: They are abusive to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should spend more time with your partner.
Update: You want to have a good relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should spend more time with your partner.
Update: They are deployed over seas.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should spend more time with your partner.
Update: You haven't seen them in a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should spend more time with your partner.
Update: you are already smothering your partner and they have asked you to give them some space.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should spend more time with your partner.
Update: you have been working so much recently that you have been neglectful of your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should spend more time with your partner.
Update: Your partner says they feel smothered.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should spend more time with your partner.
Update: Your partner says they feel lonely.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should spend more time with your partner.
Update: They have a cold and are resting.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should spend more time with your partner.
Update: You both have the week off from work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you tell your friend if you can't make it to a meeting with them.
Update: You have gotten in a bad car crash.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you tell your friend if you can't make it to a meeting with them.
Update: You are meeting somewhere for dinner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you tell your friend if you can't make it to a meeting with them.
Update: You are in a coma.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you tell your friend if you can't make it to a meeting with them.
Update: There's no good reason you can't call them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you tell your friend if you can't make it to a meeting with them.
Update: You had a car accident and are in a coma
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you tell your friend if you can't make it to a meeting with them.
Update: They were expecting the meeting for a week
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you tell your friend if you can't make it to a meeting with them.
Update: your phone ran out of battery
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you tell your friend if you can't make it to a meeting with them.
Update: you were aware well ahead of time that you couldn't be there.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you tell your friend if you can't make it to a meeting with them.
Update: Your phone is dead.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you tell your friend if you can't make it to a meeting with them.
Update: Your phone is charged.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't send mean messages to someone higher in status than you.
Update: It's making a point about a serious matter.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't send mean messages to someone higher in status than you.
Update: It's making a point about a trivial matter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't send mean messages to someone higher in status than you.
Update: They constantly harass you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't send mean messages to someone higher in status than you.
Update: You are only angry at them for being better off than you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't send mean messages to someone higher in status than you.
Update: You're planning on quitting your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't send mean messages to someone higher in status than you.
Update: You're trying to get a promotion.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't send mean messages to someone higher in status than you.
Update: You're trying to get fired in order to get a severance package.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't send mean messages to someone higher in status than you.
Update: You really need your job to pay the rent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't send mean messages to someone higher in status than you.
Update: They always talk down to you and others for being poorer than them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't send mean messages to someone higher in status than you.
Update: They are your boss
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you will be fired if you choose to miss work.
Update: you are sick
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you will be fired if you choose to miss work.
Update: call in sick and you aren't
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you will be fired if you choose to miss work.
Update: you have been involved in a life threatening accident.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you will be fired if you choose to miss work.
Update: you don't bother calling in.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you will be fired if you choose to miss work.
Update: You have the stomach flu.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you will be fired if you choose to miss work.
Update: You don't call in ahead of time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you will be fired if you choose to miss work.
Update: You have a doctor's note for your absence.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you will be fired if you choose to miss work.
Update: You post about your day off on social media.
Update type: strengthener