tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is okay to let someone know that you are busy and will call them back later
Update: They are having an emergency and need you to give them a ride.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to let someone know that you are busy and will call them back later
Update: They are always making unreasonable demands of your time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to let someone know that you are busy and will call them back later
Update: they have an urgent problem
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to let someone know that you are busy and will call them back later
Update: they just want to chat
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to let someone know that you are busy and will call them back later
Update: The person will be deploying and won’t be near a phone for awhile.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to let someone know that you are busy and will call them back later
Update: You are at a work meeting.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not get someone a lot of Valentines gifts if you put a lot of thought into them.
Update: you do not have enough money to get something better.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not get someone a lot of Valentines gifts if you put a lot of thought into them.
Update: you're with someone who's very materialistic
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not get someone a lot of Valentines gifts if you put a lot of thought into them.
Update: you're with someone who's not very materialistic
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not get someone a lot of Valentines gifts if you put a lot of thought into them.
Update: You are financially unstable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not get someone a lot of Valentines gifts if you put a lot of thought into them.
Update: You know they prefer quantity over quality.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not get someone a lot of Valentines gifts if you put a lot of thought into them.
Update: You get them the one thing they really wanted.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being selfish with family can damage even the strongest relationships.
Update: The other people know you and understand.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being selfish with family can damage even the strongest relationships.
Update: You consistently choose your family over your spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being selfish with family can damage even the strongest relationships.
Update: you take the time to explain yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being selfish with family can damage even the strongest relationships.
Update: you have no remorse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being selfish with family can damage even the strongest relationships.
Update: The other person is an enabler.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being selfish with family can damage even the strongest relationships.
Update: The family doesn't have a lot to begin with.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being selfish with family can damage even the strongest relationships.
Update: You would do anything to protect your whole family
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being selfish with family can damage even the strongest relationships.
Update: Your brother thinks you spend way too much time with family members that are toxic
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being selfish with family can damage even the strongest relationships.
Update: the relationships were already beyond repair
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being selfish with family can damage even the strongest relationships.
Update: your family always helps you in times of need
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to obey your parents.
Update: Your parents are drunken idiots
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to obey your parents.
Update: They are firm but good parents
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to obey your parents.
Update: You are an adult.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to obey your parents.
Update: You are a toddler.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to obey your parents.
Update: They are asking you to do immoral things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to obey your parents.
Update: They have your best interests at heart.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to obey your parents.
Update: They squandered the family fortune on drugs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to obey your parents.
Update: You live in their house.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to obey your parents.
Update: you don't live with them anymore
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to obey your parents.
Update: you're still living in their house
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to go back to old habits.
Update: They do not cause anyone harm.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to go back to old habits.
Update: They are harmful to your health.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to go back to old habits.
Update: Those habits were good creative outlets
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to go back to old habits.
Update: Those habits involved drugs
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to go back to old habits.
Update: Those habits are good habits, like getting enough sleep.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to go back to old habits.
Update: Those habits are costly, like smoking cigarettes.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to go back to old habits.
Update: You really need the money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to go back to old habits.
Update: it might cause you physical harm.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to go back to old habits.
Update: they have some nostalgia attached to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to go back to old habits.
Update: they are destructive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to look their best during an important event.
Update: It is a Halloween party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to look their best during an important event.
Update: You're attending a wedding.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to look their best during an important event.
Update: You're running a marathon.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to look their best during an important event.
Update: You're trying to raise money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to look their best during an important event.
Update: They always look their best
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to look their best during an important event.
Update: It is your graduation ceremony
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to look their best during an important event.
Update: she is sick
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to look their best during an important event.
Update: there are going to be pictures taken
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to look their best during an important event.
Update: They'll be meeting your parents for the first time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to ask for help.
Update: You are taking a test in class.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to ask for help.
Update: You don't understand your homework.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to ask for help.
Update: You don't actually need it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to ask for help.
Update: Someone offers and you want to take them up on it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to ask for help.
Update: it would make you uncomfortable.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to ask for help.
Update: there is someone willing to help you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to ask for help.
Update: you are in danger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to ask for help.
Update: you are the one helping somebody.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to ask for help.
Update: you are a student in a class
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to use a racial slur.
Update: you are auditioning for a part in a play that uses the slurs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to use a racial slur.
Update: there are people around you who would be hurt by it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to use a racial slur.
Update: You're teaching a class about what words are racial slurs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to use a racial slur.
Update: A person of that race is present.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to use a racial slur.
Update: You are describing what someone else said
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to use a racial slur.
Update: You are mad at someone
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to use a racial slur.
Update: you are in public
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to respect their bosses.
Update: their boss is a crook
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to respect their bosses.
Update: they want a promotion
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to respect their bosses.
Update: the boss is unjust, unfair, biased, or racist
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to respect their bosses.
Update: the boss shows employees the same respect in return
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to respect their bosses.
Update: They are quitting their job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to respect their bosses.
Update: They want to keep their job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to respect their bosses.
Update: Their boss is sexually harassing them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to respect their bosses.
Update: The person wants to be promoted
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to respect their bosses.
Update: Their bosses disrespect them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to respect their bosses.
Update: They want promotions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to block a friend without telling them why.
Update: The friend is stalking you and you don't feel safe having any contact with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to block a friend without telling them why.
Update: The two of you have been friends for a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to block a friend without telling them why.
Update: You are playing basketball.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to block a friend without telling them why.
Update: You have broken up a relationship with a close friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to block a friend without telling them why.
Update: that friend already knows why.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to block a friend without telling them why.
Update: you accidentally block the wrong friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to block a friend without telling them why.
Update: They have continued to do something that you have told them hurts you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to block a friend without telling them why.
Update: They are one of your oldest friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to block a friend without telling them why.
Update: they know why you've done it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to block a friend without telling them why.
Update: they are clueless
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to have a filter rather than being excessively harsh with someone.
Update: they really need to hear it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to have a filter rather than being excessively harsh with someone.
Update: this person is your boss.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to have a filter rather than being excessively harsh with someone.
Update: They are resistant to criticism and are likely to be just as critical as you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to have a filter rather than being excessively harsh with someone.
Update: They are a highly sensitive person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to have a filter rather than being excessively harsh with someone.
Update: They aren't responding to kindness.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to have a filter rather than being excessively harsh with someone.
Update: They are very sensitive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to have a filter rather than being excessively harsh with someone.
Update: You're in boot camp.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to have a filter rather than being excessively harsh with someone.
Update: You're talking to your child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to have a filter rather than being excessively harsh with someone.
Update: The person is sensitive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Gambling all of your money is irresponsible.
Update: It was earmarked for gambling and your bills are all paid.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Gambling all of your money is irresponsible.
Update: You are gambling with your rent, bill and food money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Gambling all of your money is irresponsible.
Update: You are independently wealthy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Gambling all of your money is irresponsible.
Update: You have rent to pay.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Gambling all of your money is irresponsible.
Update: You work at a casino and it's your job to test all the slot machines.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Gambling all of your money is irresponsible.
Update: You don't have enough money to pay the rent and buy food.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Gambling all of your money is irresponsible.
Update: You have no wife or children and have an incurable disease.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Gambling all of your money is irresponsible.
Update: You have a large family to support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Gambling all of your money is irresponsible.
Update: you are poor to begin with.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to ask their best friend to be their groomsman or bridesmaid in their wedding.
Update: Everyone knows you want a sibling instead.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to ask their best friend to be their groomsman or bridesmaid in their wedding.
Update: You were very close your whole life and there's no family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to ask their best friend to be their groomsman or bridesmaid in their wedding.
Update: They are dead.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to ask their best friend to be their groomsman or bridesmaid in their wedding.
Update: They love each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to ask their best friend to be their groomsman or bridesmaid in their wedding.
Update: You already promised your brother or sister that they could be in the wedding.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to ask their best friend to be their groomsman or bridesmaid in their wedding.
Update: You were already groomsman or bridesmaid in their wedding.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to ask their best friend to be their groomsman or bridesmaid in their wedding.
Update: They are eloping.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to ask their best friend to be their groomsman or bridesmaid in their wedding.
Update: They were a bridesmaid or best man in their best friend's wedding.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to ask their best friend to be their groomsman or bridesmaid in their wedding.
Update: they made a promise to someone else they'd put them in that role
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to ask their best friend to be their groomsman or bridesmaid in their wedding.
Update: their best friend is really good friends with their spouse too
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that a father would be more encouraging when their child is going through a difficult situation
Update: The child broke the law in a violent way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that a father would be more encouraging when their child is going through a difficult situation
Update: The child was put into the situation by adults who mistreated them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that a father would be more encouraging when their child is going through a difficult situation
Update: It is more of a mother daughter issue.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that a father would be more encouraging when their child is going through a difficult situation
Update: It is more of a father son issue.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that a father would be more encouraging when their child is going through a difficult situation
Update: the father is trying to make the situation a learning experience.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that a father would be more encouraging when their child is going through a difficult situation
Update: the father wants to teach his child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that a father would be more encouraging when their child is going through a difficult situation
Update: The child is suicidal.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that a father would be more encouraging when their child is going through a difficult situation
Update: The father is a bad parent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that a father would be more encouraging when their child is going through a difficult situation
Update: The father is a supportive parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to stop being friends with a child with autism.
Update: The child is out of control.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to stop being friends with a child with autism.
Update: You just don't like their neurodivergent behavior.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to stop being friends with a child with autism.
Update: you move far away from where the child lives
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to stop being friends with a child with autism.
Update: the child looks up to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to stop being friends with a child with autism.
Update: You stop being friends because your parents move away.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to stop being friends with a child with autism.
Update: You blame them for the friendship breaking up.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to stop being friends with a child with autism.
Update: Unless you are moving far away.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to stop being friends with a child with autism.
Update: Especially if they trust you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to stop being friends with a child with autism.
Update: They've become aggressive towards you whenever you're around them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is hurtful to stop being friends with a child with autism.
Update: You're one of the few people they trust.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to raise the billing rate of a former employee.
Update: They took you to court and it was part of the order.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to raise the billing rate of a former employee.
Update: They are now working in a different industry.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to raise the billing rate of a former employee.
Update: a former employee fails to meet your expectation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to raise the billing rate of a former employee.
Update: a former employee does a good job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to raise the billing rate of a former employee.
Update: The employee's contract prohibits raising billing rates.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to raise the billing rate of a former employee.
Update: The billing rate went up in general.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to raise the billing rate of a former employee.
Update: You keep the profits for yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to raise the billing rate of a former employee.
Update: You split the new profits equally
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to raise the billing rate of a former employee.
Update: They were your best employee ever
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to raise the billing rate of a former employee.
Update: They weren’t that good of an employee
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Getting mad at someone for saying nice things to you is selfish.
Update: They are a stranger and they are catcalling you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Getting mad at someone for saying nice things to you is selfish.
Update: You asked their opinion.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Getting mad at someone for saying nice things to you is selfish.
Update: you specifically said not to do that.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Getting mad at someone for saying nice things to you is selfish.
Update: they are doing it being genuinely nice.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Getting mad at someone for saying nice things to you is selfish.
Update: They are actually being condescending
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Getting mad at someone for saying nice things to you is selfish.
Update: They are just trying to be nice
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Getting mad at someone for saying nice things to you is selfish.
Update: They're intentionally doing it just to irritate you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Getting mad at someone for saying nice things to you is selfish.
Update: It's your significant other telling you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Getting mad at someone for saying nice things to you is selfish.
Update: The person's compliments were said in a creepy way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Getting mad at someone for saying nice things to you is selfish.
Update: The person complimenting you was your grandma.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to ask your partner not to do something that might be harmful to them.
Update: they are saving the life of a child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to ask your partner not to do something that might be harmful to them.
Update: they are in danger of dying.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to ask your partner not to do something that might be harmful to them.
Update: It is happening during an emergency.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to ask your partner not to do something that might be harmful to them.
Update: You care about their well being.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to ask your partner not to do something that might be harmful to them.
Update: Your partner is passionate about body modification.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to ask your partner not to do something that might be harmful to them.
Update: Your partner is intoxicated.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to ask your partner not to do something that might be harmful to them.
Update: They are too stubborn to listen
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to ask your partner not to do something that might be harmful to them.
Update: It involves illegal drugs
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to ask your partner not to do something that might be harmful to them.
Update: It is something that they really want to do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's appropriate to ask your partner not to do something that might be harmful to them.
Update: It will affect both of your lives.
Update type: strengthener