tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's rude to prank someone.
Update: You don't know them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to prank someone.
Update: It's April Fools Day.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to prank someone.
Update: It's not April Fools Day.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to prank someone.
Update: it is part of a tradition at a school.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to prank someone.
Update: it is an elderly person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to prank someone.
Update: the person has pranked you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to prank someone.
Update: someone might get hurt.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are responsible for anything bad that happens if you do not want someone that someone else is dangerous.
Update: You never had the chance to warn them before something happened.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are responsible for anything bad that happens if you do not want someone that someone else is dangerous.
Update: You had the opportunity to do so but did not out of laziness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are responsible for anything bad that happens if you do not want someone that someone else is dangerous.
Update: You are not aware they are dangerous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are responsible for anything bad that happens if you do not want someone that someone else is dangerous.
Update: You chose that environment.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are responsible for anything bad that happens if you do not want someone that someone else is dangerous.
Update: You have accidentally walked into a bad situation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are responsible for anything bad that happens if you do not want someone that someone else is dangerous.
Update: You purposely put yourself in an area that is known for crime
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are responsible for anything bad that happens if you do not want someone that someone else is dangerous.
Update: it is well known that they are dangerous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are responsible for anything bad that happens if you do not want someone that someone else is dangerous.
Update: someone is unfamiliar with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Arguing with your partner's friends can cause your partner to get angry with you.
Update: Their friends are making fun of your partner
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Arguing with your partner's friends can cause your partner to get angry with you.
Update: Their friends are in the right
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Arguing with your partner's friends can cause your partner to get angry with you.
Update: Your partner also finds that particular friend annoying.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Arguing with your partner's friends can cause your partner to get angry with you.
Update: You pick fights with every friend your partner has.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Arguing with your partner's friends can cause your partner to get angry with you.
Update: Your partner shares the same political views as you but not their friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Arguing with your partner's friends can cause your partner to get angry with you.
Update: You start the argument to force your partner to choose between you or their friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Arguing with your partner's friends can cause your partner to get angry with you.
Update: you partner takes your side.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Arguing with your partner's friends can cause your partner to get angry with you.
Update: you are in the wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Arguing with your partner's friends can cause your partner to get angry with you.
Update: Your partner is on your side of the argument.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Arguing with your partner's friends can cause your partner to get angry with you.
Update: You're arguing about something embarrassing to your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to expect other people to do your chores for you.
Update: You have hired a maid service and you pay them for it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to expect other people to do your chores for you.
Update: You are just being lazy and other people have their own things to do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to expect other people to do your chores for you.
Update: they already offered to do them for you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to expect other people to do your chores for you.
Update: you have plenty of time to do the chores yourself
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to expect other people to do your chores for you.
Update: You're stuck in bed with an illness.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to expect other people to do your chores for you.
Update: You have more free time than everyone else.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to expect other people to do your chores for you.
Update: You're injured with a cast.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to expect other people to do your chores for you.
Update: You're the one creating the mess.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to expect other people to do your chores for you.
Update: You paid them a large sum of money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to expect other people to do your chores for you.
Update: You never do their chores due to working late.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to date someone a friend is interested in.
Update: The friend is cool with it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to date someone a friend is interested in.
Update: They like them more than you do
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to date someone a friend is interested in.
Update: The friend has told you it was okay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to date someone a friend is interested in.
Update: The friend knew the person first.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to date someone a friend is interested in.
Update: You don't know your friend is interested in them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to date someone a friend is interested in.
Update: Your friend has told you they want to ask them out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to date someone a friend is interested in.
Update: Your friend agrees that you should date.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to date someone a friend is interested in.
Update: The person is interested in dating your friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to date someone a friend is interested in.
Update: You met them and started dating them before your friend did.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to date someone a friend is interested in.
Update: They expressed their interest long before you even met the person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Complaining seldom is a good way to interact with organizations.
Update: Something wrong has happened to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Complaining seldom is a good way to interact with organizations.
Update: You're trying to get hired by the organization.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Complaining seldom is a good way to interact with organizations.
Update: The organization you're in is hurting you and no one is listening to any complaints at all.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Complaining seldom is a good way to interact with organizations.
Update: You want the organization to keep your job and be fond of you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Complaining seldom is a good way to interact with organizations.
Update: You have an issue with the organization
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Complaining seldom is a good way to interact with organizations.
Update: You love what the organization stands for
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Complaining seldom is a good way to interact with organizations.
Update: They created a product that injured your baby.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Complaining seldom is a good way to interact with organizations.
Update: The organization never answers their messages.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Complaining seldom is a good way to interact with organizations.
Update: you are insulting the organization blatantly
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Complaining seldom is a good way to interact with organizations.
Update: you have a valid complaint about them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with a friend that keeps secrets from you.
Update: It is for a good reason
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with a friend that keeps secrets from you.
Update: You don’t keep things from them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with a friend that keeps secrets from you.
Update: you keep secrets from your friends as well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with a friend that keeps secrets from you.
Update: the secrets hurt people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with a friend that keeps secrets from you.
Update: you are not that close.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with a friend that keeps secrets from you.
Update: they know everything about you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with a friend that keeps secrets from you.
Update: The secrets are about birthday gifts.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with a friend that keeps secrets from you.
Update: The secrets are about theft of your items.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with a friend that keeps secrets from you.
Update: they were trying to protect you from that secret.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with a friend that keeps secrets from you.
Update: telling the secret could help you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Singling people of a certain persuasion out can make you look bigoted.
Update: You single them out based on religious, ethnic, or sexual persuasion.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Singling people of a certain persuasion out can make you look bigoted.
Update: You did it unintentionally.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Singling people of a certain persuasion out can make you look bigoted.
Update: You are doing it on purpose to hurt someone’s feelings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Singling people of a certain persuasion out can make you look bigoted.
Update: you're doing it without bias.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Singling people of a certain persuasion out can make you look bigoted.
Update: you're doing it because of their preferences.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Singling people of a certain persuasion out can make you look bigoted.
Update: Unless you are singling out children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Singling people of a certain persuasion out can make you look bigoted.
Update: Especially if you are singling out a specific race or religion.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Singling people of a certain persuasion out can make you look bigoted.
Update: you use insensitive terminology.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected to agree to the boundaries of your relationship with your significant other.
Update: They do not want you to ever be in the same room as them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected to agree to the boundaries of your relationship with your significant other.
Update: They have never been intimate before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected to agree to the boundaries of your relationship with your significant other.
Update: You are a control freak
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected to agree to the boundaries of your relationship with your significant other.
Update: You want to have a great relationship with them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected to agree to the boundaries of your relationship with your significant other.
Update: you feel those boundaries are not realistic
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected to agree to the boundaries of your relationship with your significant other.
Update: you agree that the boundaries make sense
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected to agree to the boundaries of your relationship with your significant other.
Update: Your partner has grown or changed something about their sexuality that came after you met and originally set boundaries.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected to agree to the boundaries of your relationship with your significant other.
Update: You have discussed and not expressed any problem with things before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected to agree to the boundaries of your relationship with your significant other.
Update: the boundaries are unreasonable and controlling.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected to agree to the boundaries of your relationship with your significant other.
Update: you wish to have a solid relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Calling women whores is bad behavior.
Update: Unless you're involved in a consensual roll play with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Calling women whores is bad behavior.
Update: Especially if you want to get along with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Calling women whores is bad behavior.
Update: You are acting in a film and it's part of the script.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Calling women whores is bad behavior.
Update: It is your mother.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Calling women whores is bad behavior.
Update: They cause problems in your relationship
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Calling women whores is bad behavior.
Update: They aren’t acting like it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Calling women whores is bad behavior.
Update: The women has had many partners and feels guilty about it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to assume that somebody has bad intentions.
Update: They have blood on their clothes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to assume that somebody has bad intentions.
Update: You just met them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to assume that somebody has bad intentions.
Update: They are swinging a chainsaw at you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to assume that somebody has bad intentions.
Update: They own the candy store you went to since a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to assume that somebody has bad intentions.
Update: They've been caught trying to scam you several times before.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to assume that somebody has bad intentions.
Update: You assume that everyone who's not a blood relative has bad intentions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to assume that somebody has bad intentions.
Update: They have a history of violence
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to assume that somebody has bad intentions.
Update: There is not evidence that they ever have
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to assume that somebody has bad intentions.
Update: That person has harmed you before.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to assume that somebody has bad intentions.
Update: You're assuming that based on race.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore people.
Update: Those people are always toxic
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore people.
Update: They are your best friends
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore people.
Update: You are in a hurry to get to work on time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore people.
Update: They are trying to talk to you about something serious.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore people.
Update: Unless they are being really annoying.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore people.
Update: Especially if they are asking for help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore people.
Update: They never have anything positive to say to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore people.
Update: Those people are your children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore people.
Update: They have been rude to you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore people.
Update: You are doing it on purpose
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report dangerous behavior to the authorities.
Update: You do not have your cell phone with you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report dangerous behavior to the authorities.
Update: it’s can cause an accident
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report dangerous behavior to the authorities.
Update: The authorities are corrupt and can't be trusted.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report dangerous behavior to the authorities.
Update: The dangerous behavior is putting others in danger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report dangerous behavior to the authorities.
Update: The authorities are dirty.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report dangerous behavior to the authorities.
Update: It is your next door neighbor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report dangerous behavior to the authorities.
Update: The authorities are corrupt and need to be overthrown.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report dangerous behavior to the authorities.
Update: There are teenagers playing with fire in front of your house.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report dangerous behavior to the authorities.
Update: Unless you're the one engaging in the dangerous behaviour.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report dangerous behavior to the authorities.
Update: Especially if you think someone will get hurt.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with people and say something to them in front of children if it's in the moment.
Update: You say something with a curse word in it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with people and say something to them in front of children if it's in the moment.
Update: They don't know what you are saying.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with people and say something to them in front of children if it's in the moment.
Update: Unless it's something personal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with people and say something to them in front of children if it's in the moment.
Update: Especially if the children are older.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with people and say something to them in front of children if it's in the moment.
Update: They're not your children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with people and say something to them in front of children if it's in the moment.
Update: They said something very bad.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with people and say something to them in front of children if it's in the moment.
Update: You would embarrass the adults in the eyes of the children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with people and say something to them in front of children if it's in the moment.
Update: The adults are setting a bad example for the children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with people and say something to them in front of children if it's in the moment.
Update: You don’t want to be like your parents
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with people and say something to them in front of children if it's in the moment.
Update: Your partner is acting like an idiot
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't break up with someone over petty reasons.
Update: You're not that into the other person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't break up with someone over petty reasons.
Update: The other person loves you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't break up with someone over petty reasons.
Update: There are bigger problems in the relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't break up with someone over petty reasons.
Update: You've worked through worse things together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't break up with someone over petty reasons.
Update: You experienced this same behavior in a past relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't break up with someone over petty reasons.
Update: You are loved by that person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't break up with someone over petty reasons.
Update: you're having a hard time seeing eye to eye with your partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't break up with someone over petty reasons.
Update: you have a lot in common.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't break up with someone over petty reasons.
Update: The reasons keep piling up
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't break up with someone over petty reasons.
Update: They are really sorry about it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't criticize your ex.
Update: they did something really mean to you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't criticize your ex.
Update: you haven't even seen them for years
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't criticize your ex.
Update: They criticize you publicly and attempt to humiliate you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't criticize your ex.
Update: They wanted things to end peacefully between the two of you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't criticize your ex.
Update: they really deserve it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't criticize your ex.
Update: you want to get back together with them some day.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't criticize your ex.
Update: they are a horrible person deserving of criticism
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't criticize your ex.
Update: you want to forget the relationship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't criticize your ex.
Update: They are talking bad about you to your shared child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't criticize your ex.
Update: Your shared child is listening.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to communicate with your romantic partner.
Update: you're not in a good state of mind
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to communicate with your romantic partner.
Update: your romantic partner is someone you can relay your problems off of
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to communicate with your romantic partner.
Update: They don't clean up after themselves and it frustrates you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to communicate with your romantic partner.
Update: they are away from any form of communication for a while for a reasonable reason
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to communicate with your romantic partner.
Update: you want to continue to have a healthy relationship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to communicate with your romantic partner.
Update: you wish for them to remain your romantic partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to communicate with your romantic partner.
Update: Your romantic partner is currently a researcher posted to Antartica.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to communicate with your romantic partner.
Update: They're a naturally talkative person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to request your partner do something that will be helpful to the relationship.
Update: Unless you don't really want to be in the relationship anymore.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to request your partner do something that will be helpful to the relationship.
Update: Especially if you want the relationship to last.
Update type: strengthener