tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: You would want to know if the person you are seeing is dating other people.
Update: you were just starting your relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You would want to know if the person you are seeing is dating other people.
Update: you were starting to get serious.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to want people younger than you to talk to you with respect.
Update: You're silly and foolish.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to want people younger than you to talk to you with respect.
Update: You've done respectable things.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to want people younger than you to talk to you with respect.
Update: they are only barely a year younger
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to want people younger than you to talk to you with respect.
Update: they are way younger than you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to want people younger than you to talk to you with respect.
Update: You are not a respectable person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to want people younger than you to talk to you with respect.
Update: It shows politeness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to want people younger than you to talk to you with respect.
Update: you do not treat them with respect in return.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to want people younger than you to talk to you with respect.
Update: you are an authority figure of sorts.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to want people younger than you to talk to you with respect.
Update: you are treating younger people disrespectfully
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to want people younger than you to talk to you with respect.
Update: they are your children
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone you have broken up with to be there for you emotionally.
Update: You stayed friends and often talk to each other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone you have broken up with to be there for you emotionally.
Update: You haven't spoken since the breakup.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone you have broken up with to be there for you emotionally.
Update: you have a child together and you still need his support.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone you have broken up with to be there for you emotionally.
Update: you are the one that broke up with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone you have broken up with to be there for you emotionally.
Update: You are still very good friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone you have broken up with to be there for you emotionally.
Update: You called them mean names.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone you have broken up with to be there for you emotionally.
Update: You are bearing their child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone you have broken up with to be there for you emotionally.
Update: You have a new partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone you have broken up with to be there for you emotionally.
Update: That person has said that they want to be your friend still.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone you have broken up with to be there for you emotionally.
Update: That person is still angry about the breakup.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't swear at others.
Update: They are your parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't swear at others.
Update: You are in a rap battle.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't swear at others.
Update: You are talking to children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't swear at others.
Update: You're a rock musician.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't swear at others.
Update: You're a school teacher.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't swear at others.
Update: Other people call you rude names
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't swear at others.
Update: You are at a funeral
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't swear at others.
Update: The swearing will let off enough steam that you don't try to physically harm them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't swear at others.
Update: They are nuns and priests.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's insensitive to not be supportive of your significant other.
Update: Your significant other wants you to support their efforts to ruin an innocent person's life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's insensitive to not be supportive of your significant other.
Update: They're having a difficult time with their boss.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's insensitive to not be supportive of your significant other.
Update: Your significant other is a drug dealer.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's insensitive to not be supportive of your significant other.
Update: Your significant other cares about you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's insensitive to not be supportive of your significant other.
Update: Your significant other is in jail for committing crimes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's insensitive to not be supportive of your significant other.
Update: Your significant other is in the hospital having surgery.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's insensitive to not be supportive of your significant other.
Update: Your significant other is doing something self-destructive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's insensitive to not be supportive of your significant other.
Update: Your support could be really helpful and uplifting to your significant other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's insensitive to not be supportive of your significant other.
Update: You feel that they are wrong.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's insensitive to not be supportive of your significant other.
Update: They are relying on your support to keep themselves going.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to miss an event if you are one of only a few attendees.
Update: the event planner told you that you didn't have to come because hardly anyone else was coming.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to miss an event if you are one of only a few attendees.
Update: you promised the event planner that you were going to be there no matter what.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to miss an event if you are one of only a few attendees.
Update: It's due to an illness or some other acceptable excuse.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to miss an event if you are one of only a few attendees.
Update: You have a major role to play in said event.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to miss an event if you are one of only a few attendees.
Update: You had a medical emergency
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to miss an event if you are one of only a few attendees.
Update: You said you were coming many times
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to miss an event if you are one of only a few attendees.
Update: You had an accident and need medical care.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to miss an event if you are one of only a few attendees.
Update: The event is for your young daughter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to miss an event if you are one of only a few attendees.
Update: you're sick in bed on the day of the event
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to miss an event if you are one of only a few attendees.
Update: your presence is being counted on
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's considered inappropriate to equate a hairstyle with a certain ethnicity.
Update: You're talking about dreadlocks which is pretty inclusive of every civilization over the last 3,500 plus years.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's considered inappropriate to equate a hairstyle with a certain ethnicity.
Update: It's considered a new kind of style without a history.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's considered inappropriate to equate a hairstyle with a certain ethnicity.
Update: You belong to that ethnicity and describe it as part of your culture.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's considered inappropriate to equate a hairstyle with a certain ethnicity.
Update: You're appropriating that hairstyle from a different culture.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's considered inappropriate to equate a hairstyle with a certain ethnicity.
Update: The hairstyle is a historically traditional hairstyle within one ethnic community.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's considered inappropriate to equate a hairstyle with a certain ethnicity.
Update: The hairstyle is a very common one.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's considered inappropriate to equate a hairstyle with a certain ethnicity.
Update: The person equating the hairstyle is from that specific ethnicity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's considered inappropriate to equate a hairstyle with a certain ethnicity.
Update: You are not a part of that ethnicity.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be rude or cruel to people.
Update: They hurt defenseless animals.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be rude or cruel to people.
Update: They are your prisoner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be rude or cruel to people.
Update: They didn't do anything to deserve it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be rude or cruel to people.
Update: you are fighting for your life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be rude or cruel to people.
Update: they are kind and good.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be rude or cruel to people.
Update: They pay you to do that sort of thing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be rude or cruel to people.
Update: They have been rude or cruel to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be rude or cruel to people.
Update: They've been rude while you've tried to be polite for 15 minutes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be rude or cruel to people.
Update: You're supposed to be a professional mediator.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep a secret from your girlfriend.
Update: You are planning to propose to her.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep a secret from your girlfriend.
Update: Her pet has passed away while she was at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep a secret from your girlfriend.
Update: She's really bad at keeping secrets.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep a secret from your girlfriend.
Update: She's kept many of your secrets before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep a secret from your girlfriend.
Update: The secret is a surprise birthday party for her.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep a secret from your girlfriend.
Update: You are cheating on her.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep a secret from your girlfriend.
Update: The secret is about an engagement ring.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep a secret from your girlfriend.
Update: The secret is about another relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep a secret from your girlfriend.
Update: telling her will hurt her more.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep a secret from your girlfriend.
Update: her not knowing could be dangerous for her health.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Long distance relationships are tough.
Update: Absence makes the heart grow fonder.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Long distance relationships are tough.
Update: The bonds grow weaker with less time together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Long distance relationships are tough.
Update: You visit them on a weekly basis.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Long distance relationships are tough.
Update: You visit them on a yearly basis.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Long distance relationships are tough.
Update: You both prefer a lot of personal space and time alone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Long distance relationships are tough.
Update: You're both very clingy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Long distance relationships are tough.
Update: the couple are very committed to making them work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Long distance relationships are tough.
Update: the relationship wasn't strong to begin with.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Long distance relationships are tough.
Update: It is only for a very short time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Long distance relationships are tough.
Update: You are in love.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to hold a grudge against someone in need.
Update: That person hurt you badly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to hold a grudge against someone in need.
Update: Your grudge is based on classism.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to hold a grudge against someone in need.
Update: They tried to stab your cousin.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to hold a grudge against someone in need.
Update: They are in danger of freezing to death.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to hold a grudge against someone in need.
Update: they are in need because they refuse to stop doing drugs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to hold a grudge against someone in need.
Update: they are trying to get their life together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to hold a grudge against someone in need.
Update: they try to take advantage of you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to hold a grudge against someone in need.
Update: you work at a shelter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to hold a grudge against someone in need.
Update: The person is a murderer and is in need of a lawyer.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to hold a grudge against someone in need.
Update: The issue was trivial and the person is homeless and hungry.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should always trust their significant other.
Update: They have cheated in the past.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should always trust their significant other.
Update: They have always been loyal and honest.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should always trust their significant other.
Update: they have done something very distrustful.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should always trust their significant other.
Update: they have never done anything thats distrustful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should always trust their significant other.
Update: they have given you a reason not to trust them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should always trust their significant other.
Update: they have always been trustworthy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should always trust their significant other.
Update: they have a history of cheating.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should always trust their significant other.
Update: you want the relationship to last.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should always trust their significant other.
Update: They are a pathological liar.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should always trust their significant other.
Update: You are happily married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to back out of duties for the special occasion of a friend.
Update: you already have prior obligations scheduled
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to back out of duties for the special occasion of a friend.
Update: your friend is relying on your to fulfill your duties
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to back out of duties for the special occasion of a friend.
Update: You would lose your job if you don't work an emergency shift that overlaps with their special occasion.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to back out of duties for the special occasion of a friend.
Update: You're considering ditching them to hang out with a more popular friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to back out of duties for the special occasion of a friend.
Update: You have someone who can cover you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to back out of duties for the special occasion of a friend.
Update: No one can cover you at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to back out of duties for the special occasion of a friend.
Update: Someone else can take over the duties.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to back out of duties for the special occasion of a friend.
Update: It's a once in a lifetime occasion.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to back out of duties for the special occasion of a friend.
Update: you are deathly ill.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to back out of duties for the special occasion of a friend.
Update: your friend is counting on you and has no backup.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Admitting your sexual preferences is perfectly fine.
Update: You are talking to your religious grandparents
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Admitting your sexual preferences is perfectly fine.
Update: You are having a conversation with a friend
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Admitting your sexual preferences is perfectly fine.
Update: Your sexual preference is illegal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Admitting your sexual preferences is perfectly fine.
Update: You are talking with a consenting adult.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Admitting your sexual preferences is perfectly fine.
Update: You're attracted to children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Admitting your sexual preferences is perfectly fine.
Update: You live in a supportive, progressive community.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Admitting your sexual preferences is perfectly fine.
Update: You're in a business meeting.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Admitting your sexual preferences is perfectly fine.
Update: You value your sex life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get angry at your partner.
Update: they did something behind your back that you don't approve of
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get angry at your partner.
Update: they don't usually make any mistakes in your relationship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get angry at your partner.
Update: they have done something awful.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get angry at your partner.
Update: the incident is minor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get angry at your partner.
Update: They stole your money without asking.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get angry at your partner.
Update: You had a bad day at work and are taking it out on them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get angry at your partner.
Update: The cheated on you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get angry at your partner.
Update: They didn't do anything wrong
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get angry at your partner.
Update: Your partner cheated on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get angry at your partner.
Update: You want your partner to feel safe around you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to care about social responsibility and background of the businesses they support.
Update: They are just in it for the profits.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to care about social responsibility and background of the businesses they support.
Update: It affects society as a whole.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to care about social responsibility and background of the businesses they support.
Update: They need to purchase from a certain business.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to care about social responsibility and background of the businesses they support.
Update: They say they like to support good businesses.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to care about social responsibility and background of the businesses they support.
Update: they are a counselor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to care about social responsibility and background of the businesses they support.
Update: There is a chance of animal cruelty.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to care about social responsibility and background of the businesses they support.
Update: They live in a Communist country.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to care about social responsibility and background of the businesses they support.
Update: They live in a small town.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be more respectful of your friends.
Update: you want to end the relationship with them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be more respectful of your friends.
Update: you want to keep the relationship thriving
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be more respectful of your friends.
Update: your friends are not respectful of you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be more respectful of your friends.
Update: you wish for your friends to be respectful of you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be more respectful of your friends.
Update: You don't feel like they're good friends and want to make new ones.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be more respectful of your friends.
Update: You want to grow your relationships and become closer over time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be more respectful of your friends.
Update: Your friends are not respectful of you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be more respectful of your friends.
Update: You want your friends to like you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be more respectful of your friends.
Update: They demean you in front of your other friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be more respectful of your friends.
Update: They support you during hardship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK for children to have hyphenated surnames.
Update: The child's name won't fit on the birth certificate.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK for children to have hyphenated surnames.
Update: The child's name is a combination of both parent's names.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK for children to have hyphenated surnames.
Update: The children will be picked on at school for it or suffer greatly as a result.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK for children to have hyphenated surnames.
Update: Both parents are raising them together and the kids are okay with it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK for children to have hyphenated surnames.
Update: They have two parents with two different last names.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK for children to have hyphenated surnames.
Update: The names would be too long.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK for children to have hyphenated surnames.
Update: Their mother is a feminist.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK for children to have hyphenated surnames.
Update: You don’t like your own name
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK for children to have hyphenated surnames.
Update: You are on good terms with your ex
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to come to work when you're ill.
Update: You have to meet an absolutely critical deadline.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to come to work when you're ill.
Update: There's not much work that needs to be done.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to come to work when you're ill.
Update: you're only sick with a mild cold
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to come to work when you're ill.
Update: you have the flu
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to come to work when you're ill.
Update: you won't be able to eat if you don't work
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to come to work when you're ill.
Update: you are contagious
Update type: strengthener