tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset with your boyfriend, if you have a reason.
Update: You are constantly getting upset.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset with your boyfriend, if you have a reason.
Update: You express your feelings in a calm constructive way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset with your boyfriend, if you have a reason.
Update: You always blow things out of proportion
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset with your boyfriend, if you have a reason.
Update: They cheated on you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner when their family member passes away.
Update: they were close with that person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner when their family member passes away.
Update: Their family member was a bitter and abusive person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner when their family member passes away.
Update: Your partner loses their parent and they were really close to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner when their family member passes away.
Update: they ask you to give them space.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner when their family member passes away.
Update: they're struggling with the loss.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner when their family member passes away.
Update: They're happy that awful person is dead.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner when their family member passes away.
Update: They were extremely close to that family member.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner when their family member passes away.
Update: They weren't there for you when your father passed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner when their family member passes away.
Update: It is one of their siblings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be honest about your past partners with a current partner.
Update: You are having a fling.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be honest about your past partners with a current partner.
Update: You want to get married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be honest about your past partners with a current partner.
Update: You don't completely trust them yet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be honest about your past partners with a current partner.
Update: You plan to have an open and honest relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be honest about your past partners with a current partner.
Update: You both agreed to not talk about past partners.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be honest about your past partners with a current partner.
Update: The past partner is still involved in your life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be honest about your past partners with a current partner.
Update: Your partner is your current partners sister
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be honest about your past partners with a current partner.
Update: You have a sexually transmitted disease
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be honest about your past partners with a current partner.
Update: Your past relationships trigger your trauma.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be honest about your past partners with a current partner.
Update: You're past partners are related to your current partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be content with what you have.
Update: You are poor and don't have much.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be content with what you have.
Update: You are rich and have a lot of money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be content with what you have.
Update: You are very poor
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be content with what you have.
Update: You are really rich
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be content with what you have.
Update: You are being paid under minimum wage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be content with what you have.
Update: You have a happy and healthy family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be content with what you have.
Update: You only have the clothes on your back.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be content with what you have.
Update: You're better off than most people financially.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be content with what you have.
Update: Your boss pays everyone else a lot more for the same job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be content with what you have.
Update: You don't want to be seen as greedy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you work with people you don't want to.
Update: you are your own boss.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you work with people you don't want to.
Update: you have a unique personality.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you work with people you don't want to.
Update: they won't agree to work with you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you work with people you don't want to.
Update: you're on a time constraint.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you work with people you don't want to.
Update: it's not a group activity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you work with people you don't want to.
Update: you are part of a team
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you work with people you don't want to.
Update: You work by yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you work with people you don't want to.
Update: You work for a large corporation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not be there to support your significant other at an event that is important to them.
Update: You found out they cheated on you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not be there to support your significant other at an event that is important to them.
Update: You have been with them for a long time
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not be there to support your significant other at an event that is important to them.
Update: You get ill and can't make it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not be there to support your significant other at an event that is important to them.
Update: You don't have anything going on that day.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not be there to support your significant other at an event that is important to them.
Update: You have to work or can't find a babysitter.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not be there to support your significant other at an event that is important to them.
Update: You said you would attend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not be there to support your significant other at an event that is important to them.
Update: your are out of town.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not be there to support your significant other at an event that is important to them.
Update: it is very important.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not be there to support your significant other at an event that is important to them.
Update: You are out of town on a business trip for your work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not be there to support your significant other at an event that is important to them.
Update: Your significant other is receiving a prestigious award.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you don't like certain designs.
Update: You insult the artist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you don't like certain designs.
Update: You are paying an interior designer to improve your home
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you don't like certain designs.
Update: it is because of who made them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you don't like certain designs.
Update: they just aren't your style.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you don't like certain designs.
Update: you have very specific tastes
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you don't like certain designs.
Update: You're nitpicking due to wanting something you saw on TV.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you don't like certain designs.
Update: You want your house to look perfect.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you don't like certain designs.
Update: You are picking out artwork for a museum that the general population is fond of.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you don't like certain designs.
Update: You are picking out artwork for your own home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to do something that makes you uncomfortable
Update: it is a required important medical procedure
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to do something that makes you uncomfortable
Update: you have the choice not to
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to do something that makes you uncomfortable
Update: It is medically necessary to save your life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to do something that makes you uncomfortable
Update: You are learning to say no and set boundaries.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to do something that makes you uncomfortable
Update: You are trying to overcome a phobia
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to do something that makes you uncomfortable
Update: You think the action may be illegal
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to do something that makes you uncomfortable
Update: you work in an emergency medical profession.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to do something that makes you uncomfortable
Update: someone is making unwanted sexual advances.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to do something that makes you uncomfortable
Update: It's necessary for your health.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to do something that makes you uncomfortable
Update: It's something sexual.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to dislike some aspects of your best friend.
Update: you overlook her good points
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to dislike some aspects of your best friend.
Update: she says she is perfect
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to dislike some aspects of your best friend.
Update: The aspects directly affect you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to dislike some aspects of your best friend.
Update: The aspects do not directly affect you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to dislike some aspects of your best friend.
Update: You use those things to tear them down and ruin their self esteem.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to dislike some aspects of your best friend.
Update: You are always around them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to dislike some aspects of your best friend.
Update: You share those exact same aspects.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to dislike some aspects of your best friend.
Update: It makes them a unique individual.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to dislike some aspects of your best friend.
Update: you're just doing it because you're jealous of them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to dislike some aspects of your best friend.
Update: you're an honest friend that wants to see them grow.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to control your emotions.
Update: You have been bottling it up for a long time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to control your emotions.
Update: You might say something you will regret.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to control your emotions.
Update: You are in therapy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to control your emotions.
Update: You are at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to control your emotions.
Update: You're in therapy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to control your emotions.
Update: You're in a crowded place.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to control your emotions.
Update: Someone attacks you physically
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to control your emotions.
Update: You are confronting a coworker about something
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to control your emotions.
Update: you are cheering your team on.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to control your emotions.
Update: you are trying to concentrate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to conserve one's money
Update: One has only a temporary job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to conserve one's money
Update: You already have a huge trust fund and your neighbors are going to be homeless.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to conserve one's money
Update: Your spouse just lost their job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to conserve one's money
Update: You need to pay the bills that are due now.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to conserve one's money
Update: You want to have enough money for emergencies.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to conserve one's money
Update: one hordes
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to conserve one's money
Update: if one is saving for college educations
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to conserve one's money
Update: it gets in the way of obligations
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to conserve one's money
Update: it helps you have a nicer house
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to lose interest in your significant other if they're not meeting your expectations.
Update: They are hospitalized for a terminal illness.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to lose interest in your significant other if they're not meeting your expectations.
Update: You have been through couples counseling.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to lose interest in your significant other if they're not meeting your expectations.
Update: they have a degenerative disease.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to lose interest in your significant other if they're not meeting your expectations.
Update: they are no longer having sex with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to lose interest in your significant other if they're not meeting your expectations.
Update: You don't want to break up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to lose interest in your significant other if they're not meeting your expectations.
Update: You want to break up.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to lose interest in your significant other if they're not meeting your expectations.
Update: Your expectations are so high no one could meet them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to lose interest in your significant other if they're not meeting your expectations.
Update: You have very basic expectations any adult should be able to meet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to lose interest in your significant other if they're not meeting your expectations.
Update: They come to you and apologize
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to lose interest in your significant other if they're not meeting your expectations.
Update: You also aren’t attracted to them anymore
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always invest time into your relationships.
Update: Others in the relationships never invest time for you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always invest time into your relationships.
Update: Your relationships are with your children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always invest time into your relationships.
Update: You feel the relationship isn't working out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always invest time into your relationships.
Update: You want your relationship to flourish.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always invest time into your relationships.
Update: You don't have time at the moment.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always invest time into your relationships.
Update: You feel that they're suffering.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always invest time into your relationships.
Update: they are abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always invest time into your relationships.
Update: they are with family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always invest time into your relationships.
Update: the other person is not investing time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always invest time into your relationships.
Update: the other person is investing time too
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry when someone lies to you.
Update: they were protecting someone
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry when someone lies to you.
Update: it is someone you trust
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry when someone lies to you.
Update: It's a little white lie.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry when someone lies to you.
Update: They lied about things they did behind your back.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry when someone lies to you.
Update: they were doing it to protect you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry when someone lies to you.
Update: the lie caused financial loss.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry when someone lies to you.
Update: That person was trying to surprise you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry when someone lies to you.
Update: They are lying about being faithful to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry when someone lies to you.
Update: You have made them so afraid of you that they didn't feel they could tell you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry when someone lies to you.
Update: It is your significant other doing the lying.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's normal to have difficulty meeting responsibilities if you are having psychological difficulties.
Update: You take medication for it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's normal to have difficulty meeting responsibilities if you are having psychological difficulties.
Update: You don’t have a support system in place
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's normal to have difficulty meeting responsibilities if you are having psychological difficulties.
Update: you are on medication that helps you to think better.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's normal to have difficulty meeting responsibilities if you are having psychological difficulties.
Update: you have not been taking medication that helps you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's normal to have difficulty meeting responsibilities if you are having psychological difficulties.
Update: those difficulties don't affect your ability to do so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's normal to have difficulty meeting responsibilities if you are having psychological difficulties.
Update: you've got something like depression.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's normal to have difficulty meeting responsibilities if you are having psychological difficulties.
Update: The responsibilities were set with your difficulties in consideration.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's normal to have difficulty meeting responsibilities if you are having psychological difficulties.
Update: People know of your problems.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's normal to have difficulty meeting responsibilities if you are having psychological difficulties.
Update: You are choosing not to address your issues.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's normal to have difficulty meeting responsibilities if you are having psychological difficulties.
Update: You have a rich home and work life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be upset with someone for talking bad about you publicly.
Update: They obviously have no idea what they're talking about.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be upset with someone for talking bad about you publicly.
Update: The try to turn your friends against you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be upset with someone for talking bad about you publicly.
Update: They are roasting you at an honorary event.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be upset with someone for talking bad about you publicly.
Update: They are your spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be upset with someone for talking bad about you publicly.
Update: The bad stuff is true
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be upset with someone for talking bad about you publicly.
Update: They are badmouthing you to your boss
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be upset with someone for talking bad about you publicly.
Update: the bad things are so outrageous that they only make that person look stupid.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be upset with someone for talking bad about you publicly.
Update: they are telling secrets they promised to keep.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be upset with someone for talking bad about you publicly.
Update: What they're saying is true and you feel ashamed of it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be upset with someone for talking bad about you publicly.
Update: Especially if they reveal things you told them even though it was very emotionally painful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is disrespectful to cause drama while at your girlfriends family's house.
Update: Your girlfriend's family started it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is disrespectful to cause drama while at your girlfriends family's house.
Update: You're just making trouble to make trouble.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is disrespectful to cause drama while at your girlfriends family's house.
Update: she started it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is disrespectful to cause drama while at your girlfriends family's house.
Update: it is your first time meeting her family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is disrespectful to cause drama while at your girlfriends family's house.
Update: Your girlfriend's family is abusing her.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is disrespectful to cause drama while at your girlfriends family's house.
Update: Your girlfriend's family was very inviting to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is disrespectful to cause drama while at your girlfriends family's house.
Update: It's part of a game.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is disrespectful to cause drama while at your girlfriends family's house.
Update: They're being friendly with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is disrespectful to cause drama while at your girlfriends family's house.
Update: her family treats you in a racist manner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is disrespectful to cause drama while at your girlfriends family's house.
Update: you may be in harm's way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should understand that you will probably lose your job if you do not do it.
Update: You own the company or have tenure.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should understand that you will probably lose your job if you do not do it.
Update: You are a new hire.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should understand that you will probably lose your job if you do not do it.
Update: you are laid up in the hospital.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should understand that you will probably lose your job if you do not do it.
Update: you have been slacking on your other work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should understand that you will probably lose your job if you do not do it.
Update: You work for your parents.
Update type: weakener