tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is important to keep trying to make plans for a while.
Update: You know you are expecting a major change soon.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to keep trying to make plans for a while.
Update: You want to be comfortable in your retirement.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to keep trying to make plans for a while.
Update: It is just stressing you out as you keep trying.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to keep trying to make plans for a while.
Update: It is an important event that needs to be perfect.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to keep trying to make plans for a while.
Update: You're running late to catch a flight.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to keep trying to make plans for a while.
Update: You're planning an annual vacation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want your fiance to lie down with you.
Update: They are running late for work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want your fiance to lie down with you.
Update: It's time to go to bed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want your fiance to lie down with you.
Update: They need to go to work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want your fiance to lie down with you.
Update: They have been on their feet all day.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want your fiance to lie down with you.
Update: Your fiance is in the middle of a meeting with their job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want your fiance to lie down with you.
Update: Your fiance is getting ready for bed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want your fiance to lie down with you.
Update: Your fiance has a migraine and any movement on the bed causes them agony.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want your fiance to lie down with you.
Update: You're both feeling amorous.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want your fiance to lie down with you.
Update: You wouldn't be wearing clothes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want your fiance to lie down with you.
Update: You are just napping.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to not discuss abortion with your boyfriend first if the child would be his.
Update: Unless you're not even pregnant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to not discuss abortion with your boyfriend first if the child would be his.
Update: Especially if you are both unwilling to support a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to not discuss abortion with your boyfriend first if the child would be his.
Update: The boyfriend has left you alone for another person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to not discuss abortion with your boyfriend first if the child would be his.
Update: The boyfriend wants to start a family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to not discuss abortion with your boyfriend first if the child would be his.
Update: there is a medical emergency and must abort immediately.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to not discuss abortion with your boyfriend first if the child would be his.
Update: he has stated before that he wouldn't want you to have one.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to not discuss abortion with your boyfriend first if the child would be his.
Update: Your abusive boyfriend would try to control you via pregnancy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to not discuss abortion with your boyfriend first if the child would be his.
Update: You want to continue the relationship openly and honestly
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to do something to sway someone's decisions about things when it's not what's best for them.
Update: You work as a prosecutor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to do something to sway someone's decisions about things when it's not what's best for them.
Update: You are friends with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to do something to sway someone's decisions about things when it's not what's best for them.
Update: you are an authority on the subject,
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to do something to sway someone's decisions about things when it's not what's best for them.
Update: you barely know them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to do something to sway someone's decisions about things when it's not what's best for them.
Update: they ask that you play devil's advocate
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to do something to sway someone's decisions about things when it's not what's best for them.
Update: you know that they're making the right decision already
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to do something to sway someone's decisions about things when it's not what's best for them.
Update: You are someone’s parent
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to do something to sway someone's decisions about things when it's not what's best for them.
Update: You do not know the person that well
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to do something to sway someone's decisions about things when it's not what's best for them.
Update: it's the best for a large number of people
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to do something to sway someone's decisions about things when it's not what's best for them.
Update: you're doing it only to look out for your on benefit
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't see someone's child if their parent won't allow it.
Update: you are protecting the child from an abusive situation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't see someone's child if their parent won't allow it.
Update: you don't want to go to jail.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't see someone's child if their parent won't allow it.
Update: The child has a complaint about the parent's form of punishment.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't see someone's child if their parent won't allow it.
Update: The child will be punished by the parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't see someone's child if their parent won't allow it.
Update: You're afraid the parent is abusing their child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't see someone's child if their parent won't allow it.
Update: You've previously hit the child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't see someone's child if their parent won't allow it.
Update: you suspect child abuse.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't see someone's child if their parent won't allow it.
Update: the child is very young.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't see someone's child if their parent won't allow it.
Update: The parent doesn't have custody of the the child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't see someone's child if their parent won't allow it.
Update: The parent has an order of protection against you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to point out someone's lies.
Update: it could put them in danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to point out someone's lies.
Update: they are hurting someone else.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to point out someone's lies.
Update: they are little white lies and aren't hurting anybody.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to point out someone's lies.
Update: those lies make you look bad.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to point out someone's lies.
Update: The lies are meant to protect someone
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to point out someone's lies.
Update: They are using the lies to take advantage of others
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to point out someone's lies.
Update: The person's lies work to your benefit.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to point out someone's lies.
Update: The person's lies harm you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to point out someone's lies.
Update: that person is sadly validating themselves to others by lying
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to point out someone's lies.
Update: the lies are about the personal life of someone else
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you defend your significant other in a fight.
Update: you're not there to assist them at the time
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you defend your significant other in a fight.
Update: you're able to take their side and help
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you defend your significant other in a fight.
Update: You yourself are subdued and unable to help at all.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you defend your significant other in a fight.
Update: You're able to do something and they desperately need your help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you defend your significant other in a fight.
Update: you are on crutches.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you defend your significant other in a fight.
Update: they are being jumped.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you defend your significant other in a fight.
Update: they are training in a boxing gym.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you defend your significant other in a fight.
Update: someone larger and stronger is assaulting them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you defend your significant other in a fight.
Update: The other person has a weapon
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you defend your significant other in a fight.
Update: You want to protect your spouse from harm
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's very bad to want your significant other to be totally intoxicated while you have sex with them
Update: You are very drunk yourself
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's very bad to want your significant other to be totally intoxicated while you have sex with them
Update: You are completely sober
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's very bad to want your significant other to be totally intoxicated while you have sex with them
Update: It is a fantasy that they also have.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's very bad to want your significant other to be totally intoxicated while you have sex with them
Update: You want them to be passed out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's very bad to want your significant other to be totally intoxicated while you have sex with them
Update: They have a substance abuse disorder.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to give gifts on valentine's day.
Update: You don't have a partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to give gifts on valentine's day.
Update: You are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to give gifts on valentine's day.
Update: you and your partner don't celebrate that day
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to give gifts on valentine's day.
Update: you and your partner always exchange gifts for it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to give gifts on valentine's day.
Update: you and your partner decide not to do so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to give gifts on valentine's day.
Update: your child has to give cards at school.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to give gifts on valentine's day.
Update: You and your significant other prefer going out to dinner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to give gifts on valentine's day.
Update: You and your significant other look forward to boxes of chocolates.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to give gifts on valentine's day.
Update: You are single and have no one to give a gift to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to give gifts on valentine's day.
Update: You know your significant other is planning to get you something.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you'll uphold a child's visit with their parent.
Update: Your car breaks down
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you'll uphold a child's visit with their parent.
Update: Your child is whining
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you'll uphold a child's visit with their parent.
Update: the parent might possibly be a bad influence on the child
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you'll uphold a child's visit with their parent.
Update: the parent is preparing to have that visit
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you'll uphold a child's visit with their parent.
Update: That parent went to jail for abusing the child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you'll uphold a child's visit with their parent.
Update: The child is really looking forward to seeing their parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you'll uphold a child's visit with their parent.
Update: the parent is unfit for visitation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you'll uphold a child's visit with their parent.
Update: the court has ordered visitation rights for them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you'll uphold a child's visit with their parent.
Update: the parent is caught doing drugs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you'll uphold a child's visit with their parent.
Update: the child misses their parent a lot.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to compare yourself with your significant other's former lovers.
Update: your significant other has not had former lovers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to compare yourself with your significant other's former lovers.
Update: you are a jealous person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to compare yourself with your significant other's former lovers.
Update: They only dated people the opposite sex as you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to compare yourself with your significant other's former lovers.
Update: They dated people you know.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to compare yourself with your significant other's former lovers.
Update: You significant other doesn't have any former lovers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to compare yourself with your significant other's former lovers.
Update: Their former lovers were really attractive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to compare yourself with your significant other's former lovers.
Update: they haven't had any other lovers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to compare yourself with your significant other's former lovers.
Update: you want to make sure you are just as good or better than them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to compare yourself with your significant other's former lovers.
Update: you are their first lover.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to compare yourself with your significant other's former lovers.
Update: you're insecure about your body.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never skip out on helping a friend with mental issues.
Update: The friend is violent and needs a real therapist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never skip out on helping a friend with mental issues.
Update: You are part of their support system.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never skip out on helping a friend with mental issues.
Update: They hate you for trying to help them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never skip out on helping a friend with mental issues.
Update: You went through the same issues
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never skip out on helping a friend with mental issues.
Update: Their mental issues are negatively affecting your own mental health.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never skip out on helping a friend with mental issues.
Update: They are self-harming or considering suicide.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never skip out on helping a friend with mental issues.
Update: that friend tends to be a difficult person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never skip out on helping a friend with mental issues.
Update: that friend really needs your help
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never skip out on helping a friend with mental issues.
Update: Your friend is getting good care and the issues are beyond your ability.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never skip out on helping a friend with mental issues.
Update: Your friend needs a phone number to their doctor or a mental-health helpline.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to stay calm around people when you're angry.
Update: You were nearly killed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to stay calm around people when you're angry.
Update: You are dealing with young children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to stay calm around people when you're angry.
Update: you just snapped.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to stay calm around people when you're angry.
Update: you're working with children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to stay calm around people when you're angry.
Update: Someone just punched you in the face
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to stay calm around people when you're angry.
Update: There are police around
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to stay calm around people when you're angry.
Update: You are at a protest with both sides yelling at each other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to stay calm around people when you're angry.
Update: You are at work in a professional setting.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to stay calm around people when you're angry.
Update: getting angry is the only way to get results
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to stay calm around people when you're angry.
Update: it is a volatile situation
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your partner to be considerate of your medical conditions.
Update: They don't know about your medical conditions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your partner to be considerate of your medical conditions.
Update: They've accompanied you to medical treatments.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your partner to be considerate of your medical conditions.
Update: Your partner is suffering from a more serious medical condition.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your partner to be considerate of your medical conditions.
Update: You are bed-ridden.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your partner to be considerate of your medical conditions.
Update: you have a virus and intentionally infected your partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your partner to be considerate of your medical conditions.
Update: you only have several months to live.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your partner to be considerate of your medical conditions.
Update: your medical condition really isn't that serious
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your partner to be considerate of your medical conditions.
Update: your medical condition causes an immense amount of suffering
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your partner to be considerate of your medical conditions.
Update: they are incapacitated themselves
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your partner to be considerate of your medical conditions.
Update: you depend on them as primary caregiver
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something when someone asks you not to.
Update: they are being unreasonable about it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something when someone asks you not to.
Update: it is smoking in front of them when they are pregnant.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something when someone asks you not to.
Update: you are doing something to save someone else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something when someone asks you not to.
Update: what you are doing is unnecessary and annoying.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something when someone asks you not to.
Update: It's vital to your survival.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something when someone asks you not to.
Update: You're annoying other people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something when someone asks you not to.
Update: You would be saving their life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something when someone asks you not to.
Update: doing it would be illegal.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something when someone asks you not to.
Update: They are making an unreasonable demand
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something when someone asks you not to.
Update: You want to blast loud music and they have a phone interview
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to spend special time with someone you care about.
Update: They want to be alone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to spend special time with someone you care about.
Update: They are going through depression.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to spend special time with someone you care about.
Update: they don't want to spend time with you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to spend special time with someone you care about.
Update: they want to spend time with you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to spend special time with someone you care about.
Update: They are at work and busy
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to spend special time with someone you care about.
Update: You want some alone time
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to spend special time with someone you care about.
Update: You need to work or you will be fired
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to spend special time with someone you care about.
Update: Your partner misses you after being away for a week
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to spend special time with someone you care about.
Update: Unless they are in prison.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to spend special time with someone you care about.
Update: Especially if you want a future with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should treat the money of others carefully.
Update: They gifted you the money and it is now yours.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should treat the money of others carefully.
Update: Their finances are tight.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should treat the money of others carefully.
Update: it was given to you with the purpose of being frivolous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should treat the money of others carefully.
Update: you are investing money for people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should treat the money of others carefully.
Update: They told you to blow it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should treat the money of others carefully.
Update: You are a financial planner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should treat the money of others carefully.
Update: Your family has so much money that you can't possibly spend it all.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should treat the money of others carefully.
Update: An elderly relative has given you money to pay their bills.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should treat the money of others carefully.
Update: they tell you to spend as much as you want.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should treat the money of others carefully.
Update: they are poor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your friends to take you places all the time.
Update: They agreed to do so.
Update type: weakener