tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's not good to be angry with friends.
Update: Your friend missed an obligation due to an emergency.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not good to be angry with friends.
Update: They have insulted you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not good to be angry with friends.
Update: They have apologized to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not good to be angry with friends.
Update: They abandoned you in your weakest time
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not good to be angry with friends.
Update: They were not meaning to offend you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not good to be angry with friends.
Update: they said something very mean to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not good to be angry with friends.
Update: they did something to you but it was an accident.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to try to force someone to have kids when they don't want them.
Update: an abortion would be dangerous to the person's health.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to try to force someone to have kids when they don't want them.
Update: the person has been using birth control for years.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to try to force someone to have kids when they don't want them.
Update: The person is a complete stranger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to try to force someone to have kids when they don't want them.
Update: They've had conception issues in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to try to force someone to have kids when they don't want them.
Update: The other person's health is at risk in case of a pregnancy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Personal messages are expected to remain private.
Update: You send them over the internet where someone is always reading what you wrote.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Personal messages are expected to remain private.
Update: They are left in your diary
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Personal messages are expected to remain private.
Update: A judge may require personal messages to become public.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Personal messages are expected to remain private.
Update: The messages were sent between 2 people only.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Personal messages are expected to remain private.
Update: You are posting messages on social media
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Personal messages are expected to remain private.
Update: You are conducting an important business deal
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Personal messages are expected to remain private.
Update: The messages contain sensitive info
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Personal messages are expected to remain private.
Update: You are accidently BCC'd a copy of an illegal document between your manager and an employee.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Personal messages are expected to remain private.
Update: Your best friend asked you to keep her illness a secret until she finds the right way to tell her kids.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to reprimand an employee that doesn't follow rules.
Update: They hadn't been made aware of the rules yet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to reprimand an employee that doesn't follow rules.
Update: It isn't the first time they've skirted the rules.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to reprimand an employee that doesn't follow rules.
Update: You are in front of other employees.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to reprimand an employee that doesn't follow rules.
Update: They have already had a warning before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to reprimand an employee that doesn't follow rules.
Update: They did it by accident
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to reprimand an employee that doesn't follow rules.
Update: You want them to learn the business
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to reprimand an employee that doesn't follow rules.
Update: They lost out on a sale
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to reprimand an employee that doesn't follow rules.
Update: It is in front of customers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to reprimand an employee that doesn't follow rules.
Update: They are costing the company money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be selfish.
Update: Others have been unfairly depriving you of things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be selfish.
Update: Others have been very generous to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be selfish.
Update: you're homeless.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be selfish.
Update: you're rich.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be selfish.
Update: You have no one else in your life
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be selfish.
Update: You have children
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be selfish.
Update: You need some time for yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be selfish.
Update: You have more than you need.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be selfish.
Update: You are starving and need all the food to survive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be selfish.
Update: You have to share with others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like your partner doing other things during your sexual experiences.
Update: It involves other people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to cause an unpleasant disturbance in order to stop something bad from happening.
Update: You can stop something bad from happening without causing a disturbance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to cause an unpleasant disturbance in order to stop something bad from happening.
Update: There is no time to consider any other options.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to cause an unpleasant disturbance in order to stop something bad from happening.
Update: The disturbance has unknown side effects.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to cause an unpleasant disturbance in order to stop something bad from happening.
Update: There is no other way to stop the bad thing from happening.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to cause an unpleasant disturbance in order to stop something bad from happening.
Update: The unpleasant disturbance is worse than the bad thing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to cause an unpleasant disturbance in order to stop something bad from happening.
Update: The unpleasant disturbance and the bad thing both stop.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to cause an unpleasant disturbance in order to stop something bad from happening.
Update: Someone else has it under control.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to cause an unpleasant disturbance in order to stop something bad from happening.
Update: It means keeping people safe.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to cause an unpleasant disturbance in order to stop something bad from happening.
Update: it is illegal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to cause an unpleasant disturbance in order to stop something bad from happening.
Update: you are trying to stay out of trouble.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to shape a situation so it's more acceptable to everyone involved.
Update: It wouldn't be financially feasible any more.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to shape a situation so it's more acceptable to everyone involved.
Update: Too many people disagree about it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to shape a situation so it's more acceptable to everyone involved.
Update: You work for a hierarchical corporation and are at the bottom of the ladder.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to shape a situation so it's more acceptable to everyone involved.
Update: You work as a camp counselor for youths.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to shape a situation so it's more acceptable to everyone involved.
Update: None of those people want you interfering.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to shape a situation so it's more acceptable to everyone involved.
Update: They asked you to help improve the situation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to shape a situation so it's more acceptable to everyone involved.
Update: You are going to break the law in doing so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to shape a situation so it's more acceptable to everyone involved.
Update: Your goal is to make everyone happy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to shape a situation so it's more acceptable to everyone involved.
Update: Doing so accommodates bigots.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to shape a situation so it's more acceptable to everyone involved.
Update: Everyone agrees to the changes.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about someone behind their back.
Update: You are telling their wife that you saw the husband bury the neighbours cat in the backyard but didn't admit to hitting it with their car
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about someone behind their back.
Update: You want to be a good friend and continue to have a solid relationship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about someone behind their back.
Update: That person is committing crimes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about someone behind their back.
Update: The person is your friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about someone behind their back.
Update: You're talking about how to get help for someone suffering from severe Alzheimer's.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about someone behind their back.
Update: You're trying to start a nasty and false rumor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about someone behind their back.
Update: You are trying to figure out how to talk to their face.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about someone behind their back.
Update: You are gossiping and being mean.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about someone behind their back.
Update: The person is break the law.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about someone behind their back.
Update: They are your boss.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that parents are supportive of all their children's successess
Update: the successes are not all their own .
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that parents are supportive of all their children's successess
Update: they succeeded all on their own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that parents are supportive of all their children's successess
Update: Your parents hold you to a very high standard, that you feel like you can't meet
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that parents are supportive of all their children's successess
Update: After years of schooling, you finally got your PhD!
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that parents are supportive of all their children's successess
Update: The child has success by doing bad things to hurt people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that parents are supportive of all their children's successess
Update: They worked very hard for their successes.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that parents are supportive of all their children's successess
Update: The children are famous
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that parents are supportive of all their children's successess
Update: The parent is not is the child's life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that parents are supportive of all their children's successess
Update: You had a really close relationship with your child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to want your significant other to move in with you.
Update: You still live with your parents.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to want your significant other to move in with you.
Update: You have just bought a new home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to want your significant other to move in with you.
Update: You have only been dating for a week.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to want your significant other to move in with you.
Update: You have been dating for several years.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to want your significant other to move in with you.
Update: You are living out of your car.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to want your significant other to move in with you.
Update: You have a large apartment.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to want your significant other to move in with you.
Update: Your rent agreement doesn't allow roommates.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to want your significant other to move in with you.
Update: You are both ready for more commitment.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to want your significant other to move in with you.
Update: they don't feel the same way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to want your significant other to move in with you.
Update: you've been together for years.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be concerned about your parent's health.
Update: That person's doctor says they're perfectly healthy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be concerned about your parent's health.
Update: They have a serious chronic health condition.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be concerned about your parent's health.
Update: You do not get along with your parents.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be concerned about your parent's health.
Update: You and your parents are close and have a great relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be concerned about your parent's health.
Update: you don't know them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be concerned about your parent's health.
Update: they're getting old.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be concerned about your parent's health.
Update: Your mother in law is a hypochondriac who calls in the middle of the night because her stomach fluttered.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be concerned about your parent's health.
Update: your mom has stage 4 pancreatic cancer and her pain medication can make her say things she otherwise wouldn't
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be concerned about your parent's health.
Update: You never knew your parents.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be concerned about your parent's health.
Update: If they are elderly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you want a friend to do something with you, it's good to find a meeting place close to them.
Update: They have transportation and you do not.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you want a friend to do something with you, it's good to find a meeting place close to them.
Update: You have transportation and they do not.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you want a friend to do something with you, it's good to find a meeting place close to them.
Update: They love coming to your place instead
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you want a friend to do something with you, it's good to find a meeting place close to them.
Update: They don’t have a reliable vehicle
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you want a friend to do something with you, it's good to find a meeting place close to them.
Update: They live in the middle of nowhere but work close by you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you want a friend to do something with you, it's good to find a meeting place close to them.
Update: You are strictly asking them for a favor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you want a friend to do something with you, it's good to find a meeting place close to them.
Update: You are roommates.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you want a friend to do something with you, it's good to find a meeting place close to them.
Update: They don't have a car.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you want a friend to do something with you, it's good to find a meeting place close to them.
Update: Your friend lives in a desolate area.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you want a friend to do something with you, it's good to find a meeting place close to them.
Update: Your friend lives in a populated busy area.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to ask others for money.
Update: You need to pay your rent or you will be evicted.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to ask others for money.
Update: You know they have less money than you do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to ask others for money.
Update: They have offered to give you money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to ask others for money.
Update: You don't know the person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to ask others for money.
Update: You are talking to a loan officer.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to ask others for money.
Update: They're no better off than you are.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to ask others for money.
Update: You are in a desperate situation
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to ask others for money.
Update: You don't really need the money
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to ask others for money.
Update: You have no other choice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to ask others for money.
Update: You don't need the money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to watch porn when you're in a relationship.
Update: You and your partner watch together.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to watch porn when you're in a relationship.
Update: Your significant other is strongly against porn.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to watch porn when you're in a relationship.
Update: You are watching it together.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to watch porn when you're in a relationship.
Update: You hide it from them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to watch porn when you're in a relationship.
Update: You have permission
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to watch porn when you're in a relationship.
Update: Your spend time watching porn instead of having sex with your partner
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to watch porn when you're in a relationship.
Update: You like watching it together
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to watch porn when you're in a relationship.
Update: Your partner specifically said not to
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore people.
Update: You are sleeping.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore people.
Update: They have an emergency.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore people.
Update: They are being aggressive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore people.
Update: They really need help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore people.
Update: Unless they are asking you to do something wrong.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore people.
Update: Especially if they are asking for help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore people.
Update: The people are being abusive and hurtful.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore people.
Update: The people are kind and nice and befriending to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore people.
Update: You can't hear them trying to talk to you because of loudness where you are.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore people.
Update: You are looking right at them as they try to get your attention.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to base household chores on income.
Update: You made that agreement previously.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to base household chores on income.
Update: One person is a stay at home parent and the other has a job outside the home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to base household chores on income.
Update: One housemate has a lot more free time than others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to base household chores on income.
Update: All of the housemates work the same hours.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to base household chores on income.
Update: Unless one partner stays at home and it was agreed upon that they would take care of household chores.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to base household chores on income.
Update: Everyone works an equal number of hours.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to base household chores on income.
Update: Your family likes that method.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to base household chores on income.
Update: No one is happy with their chores.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be a little jealous of someone's history.
Update: They have a lot of experience and you're a virgin
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be a little jealous of someone's history.
Update: You wasted the same opportunities.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be a little jealous of someone's history.
Update: They got some very lucky breaks.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be a little jealous of someone's history.
Update: It happened 10 years ago.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be a little jealous of someone's history.
Update: It is a recent relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be a little jealous of someone's history.
Update: You're dating or with that person and are in love with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be a little jealous of someone's history.
Update: They've done things you've always only dreamed about.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be a little jealous of someone's history.
Update: you've never even met the person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be a little jealous of someone's history.
Update: the person has a lot of money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay not to let your pets go outside
Update: You don't let them use an indoor potty spot.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay not to let your pets go outside
Update: They are litter box trained.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay not to let your pets go outside
Update: Your pet is obese and depressed because they never get exercise.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay not to let your pets go outside
Update: You live in a small city apartment where there's nowhere safe to let them out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay not to let your pets go outside
Update: Your pets are dogs that need to be able to run.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay not to let your pets go outside
Update: Your pet is one that's not able to survive in your climate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay not to let your pets go outside
Update: they have to go to the bathroom.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay not to let your pets go outside
Update: it's raining.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay not to let your pets go outside
Update: they need to use the bathroom.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay not to let your pets go outside
Update: it's a rodent pet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to spend time with your friend's parents.
Update: Your friend really wants you to
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to spend time with your friend's parents.
Update: Their parents are bad people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to spend time with your friend's parents.
Update: They threw your friend out of their house.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to spend time with your friend's parents.
Update: They are letting you live with them.
Update type: strengthener