tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is expected that not all roommates will be a good match in dorm rooms.
Update: Roommates are randomly assigned to rooms.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that not all roommates will be a good match in dorm rooms.
Update: They were friends from high school.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that not all roommates will be a good match in dorm rooms.
Update: They are from different economic backgrounds.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that not all roommates will be a good match in dorm rooms.
Update: They were all friends from high school.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that not all roommates will be a good match in dorm rooms.
Update: They come from entirely different backgrounds and do not know each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that not all roommates will be a good match in dorm rooms.
Update: the roommates were able to select each other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that not all roommates will be a good match in dorm rooms.
Update: some roommates drink and some don't.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect neighbors to be respectful
Update: You've defaced your neighbor's property.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect neighbors to be respectful
Update: You've helped your neighbor improve their yard recently.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect neighbors to be respectful
Update: They ask to borrow stuff all the time
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect neighbors to be respectful
Update: you are not respectful to your neighbors.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect neighbors to be respectful
Update: you are respectful to your neighbors.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect neighbors to be respectful
Update: You pick fights with your neighbors every day.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect neighbors to be respectful
Update: You are all part of the same homeowners' association.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect neighbors to be respectful
Update: it is the one night a year they have a big family party and make a fair bit of noise.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect neighbors to be respectful
Update: you always treat them and their property with respect.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be greedy.
Update: it doesn't impact anyone else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be greedy.
Update: you would be depriving another person of something they need.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be greedy.
Update: you are a game show contestant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be greedy.
Update: you are at a fancy party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be greedy.
Update: Your family is on the edge of starvation and you need every penny to survive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be greedy.
Update: You're already extremely wealthy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be greedy.
Update: You are playing monopoly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be greedy.
Update: It would hurt other people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be greedy.
Update: You lack empathy for others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be greedy.
Update: You already have what you need.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always do what you are told.
Update: What you're told will hurt someone or others and is immoral.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always do what you are told.
Update: The person telling you is wise and you know has your best interests at heart.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always do what you are told.
Update: you are told to do something immoral or illegal
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always do what you are told.
Update: it is an order from a superior officer
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always do what you are told.
Update: You are told to do something unethical.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always do what you are told.
Update: What you are told will benefit everyone involved.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always do what you are told.
Update: you would be putting yourself in harms way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always do what you are told.
Update: you are in basic training for the military.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always do what you are told.
Update: Your are being told to do something illegal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always do what you are told.
Update: You are being paid to do it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to think your girlfriend's haircut is unattractive.
Update: you met her with that same haircut and still liked her.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to think your girlfriend's haircut is unattractive.
Update: she thinks it is unattractive also.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to think your girlfriend's haircut is unattractive.
Update: You told her to get the haircut.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to think your girlfriend's haircut is unattractive.
Update: Your mother has the same haircut.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to think your girlfriend's haircut is unattractive.
Update: She loved her haircut
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to think your girlfriend's haircut is unattractive.
Update: She doesn’t think it is either
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to think your girlfriend's haircut is unattractive.
Update: You make fun of her.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to think your girlfriend's haircut is unattractive.
Update: You have a suggestion to fix it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to think your girlfriend's haircut is unattractive.
Update: She got a short cut
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect blessings from others.
Update: You are in a church
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect blessings from others.
Update: You always do horrible things to people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect blessings from others.
Update: You are in the congregation at church.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect blessings from others.
Update: You are in a government building.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect blessings from others.
Update: They give to all equally.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect blessings from others.
Update: You act poorly to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect blessings from others.
Update: You were promised a blessing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect blessings from others.
Update: You don't know the person giving out blessings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect blessings from others.
Update: You gave them one first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect blessings from others.
Update: you don't deserve any.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Healthy competition is good.
Update: All competitors push each other to become better
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Healthy competition is good.
Update: any competition stresses you out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Healthy competition is good.
Update: you are training and trying to get better at something.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Healthy competition is good.
Update: You are in a situation where no one can win.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Healthy competition is good.
Update: You are competing in the Olympics.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Healthy competition is good.
Update: It just results in jealousy and hurt feelings.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Healthy competition is good.
Update: Encourages those involved to work harder.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Healthy competition is good.
Update: the competitive environment leads to cutthroat practices
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Healthy competition is good.
Update: you are trying to push each other to be better.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Grandparents that likely send cards with money in them should be cherished and not shunned
Update: The grandparents are racist and attempt to influence the children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Grandparents that likely send cards with money in them should be cherished and not shunned
Update: The grandparents are loving and kind.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Grandparents that likely send cards with money in them should be cherished and not shunned
Update: They're trying to buy your silence about how they abused you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Grandparents that likely send cards with money in them should be cherished and not shunned
Update: They're kind to you in many other contexts as well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Grandparents that likely send cards with money in them should be cherished and not shunned
Update: They send the gifts in order to manipulate people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Grandparents that likely send cards with money in them should be cherished and not shunned
Update: They are good people you want in your life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Grandparents that likely send cards with money in them should be cherished and not shunned
Update: they only send them to one grandchild and ignore the others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Grandparents that likely send cards with money in them should be cherished and not shunned
Update: they are generous with the cash.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Grandparents that likely send cards with money in them should be cherished and not shunned
Update: they stole the money from your parents.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Grandparents that likely send cards with money in them should be cherished and not shunned
Update: you haven't spoken to them in a while.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's kind to take in a homeless animal
Update: The animal is a wild animal
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's kind to take in a homeless animal
Update: The animal is hungry and injured
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's kind to take in a homeless animal
Update: It is a raccoon.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's kind to take in a homeless animal
Update: The animal is hurt.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's kind to take in a homeless animal
Update: The animal is rabid.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's kind to take in a homeless animal
Update: The animal becomes a beloved pet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's kind to take in a homeless animal
Update: That animal is feral and wild.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's kind to take in a homeless animal
Update: It is a wild animal that should not be domesticated.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's kind to take in a homeless animal
Update: They are injured and need to see a vet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hear a racist comment from someone and not speak out against it.
Update: Your boss made the comment and could fire you for insubordination
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hear a racist comment from someone and not speak out against it.
Update: You hear one of your subordinates say it and know they are damaging company culture
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hear a racist comment from someone and not speak out against it.
Update: you are on the subway.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hear a racist comment from someone and not speak out against it.
Update: it comes from a coworker.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hear a racist comment from someone and not speak out against it.
Update: You don't realize the comment is racist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hear a racist comment from someone and not speak out against it.
Update: You know the comment is wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hear a racist comment from someone and not speak out against it.
Update: speaking out would put you in danger at the time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hear a racist comment from someone and not speak out against it.
Update: the comment is directed at your family and your children are present.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hear a racist comment from someone and not speak out against it.
Update: You are afraid they may be violent
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hear a racist comment from someone and not speak out against it.
Update: The comments hurt you deeply
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your family needs money, it's good to lend some to them.
Update: They have a drug problem.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your family needs money, it's good to lend some to them.
Update: They have children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your family needs money, it's good to lend some to them.
Update: you're unable to afford it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your family needs money, it's good to lend some to them.
Update: you have the means to help out
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your family needs money, it's good to lend some to them.
Update: you know they won't pay it back.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your family needs money, it's good to lend some to them.
Update: they can't pay their bills.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your family needs money, it's good to lend some to them.
Update: You know they won't pay it back
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your family needs money, it's good to lend some to them.
Update: They've always paid you back before
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your family needs money, it's good to lend some to them.
Update: you have no money to lend.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your family needs money, it's good to lend some to them.
Update: the money is needed for an emergency.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect your children's possession.
Update: they have too many toys and you need to give some away.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect your children's possession.
Update: it's an item that is precious to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect your children's possession.
Update: the possessions are illegal to own
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect your children's possession.
Update: you want your children to respect your things
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect your children's possession.
Update: Your children own adult-themed literature.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect your children's possession.
Update: Your children own age-appropriate books.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect your children's possession.
Update: The possessions have the potential to cause harm.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect your children's possession.
Update: Your children are highly interested in their possessions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to talk to family members less if they are not good to you.
Update: They are in need and you are the only one who can help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to talk to family members less if they are not good to you.
Update: They cut you down and hurt you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to talk to family members less if they are not good to you.
Update: They have serious medical issues that cause them to act this way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to talk to family members less if they are not good to you.
Update: They are always prying into your business and spreading gossip.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to talk to family members less if they are not good to you.
Update: they are reaching out to apologize for their behavior.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to talk to family members less if they are not good to you.
Update: they are threatening you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to talk to family members less if they are not good to you.
Update: They're your children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to talk to family members less if they are not good to you.
Update: You're not especially close to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to talk to family members less if they are not good to you.
Update: you are trying to fix the problem.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to talk to family members less if they are not good to you.
Update: talking to them only hurts you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to put bad relationships behind you.
Update: You really loved that person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to put bad relationships behind you.
Update: They were emotionally abusive
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to put bad relationships behind you.
Update: It's a family member you know needs guidance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to put bad relationships behind you.
Update: The relationship was causing you emotional harm.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to put bad relationships behind you.
Update: You have a child from the previous relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to put bad relationships behind you.
Update: You want to have healthy relationships moving forward.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to put bad relationships behind you.
Update: you will be put into harms way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to put bad relationships behind you.
Update: the person is abusive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to put bad relationships behind you.
Update: you see that you could fix the relationship
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to put bad relationships behind you.
Update: the relationship is clearly over and in the past
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't remove someone from your Netflix account when they've gotten accustomed to using it.
Update: they have failed to pay their share of the subscription
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't remove someone from your Netflix account when they've gotten accustomed to using it.
Update: they help to pay for the subscription
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't remove someone from your Netflix account when they've gotten accustomed to using it.
Update: you downgrade your plan.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't remove someone from your Netflix account when they've gotten accustomed to using it.
Update: they have no other entertainment.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't remove someone from your Netflix account when they've gotten accustomed to using it.
Update: you've made it clear that they can't use it anymore
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't remove someone from your Netflix account when they've gotten accustomed to using it.
Update: they're also paying toward the subscription
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't remove someone from your Netflix account when they've gotten accustomed to using it.
Update: They aren't paying for it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't remove someone from your Netflix account when they've gotten accustomed to using it.
Update: They are footing half the bill.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't remove someone from your Netflix account when they've gotten accustomed to using it.
Update: You want to sever all ties with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't remove someone from your Netflix account when they've gotten accustomed to using it.
Update: You don't even use it that much, so you never hit your screen limit.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for you to not want your girlfrind to care about a colleague.
Update: Your colleague is their brother
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for you to not want your girlfrind to care about a colleague.
Update: You cannot trust your girlfriend
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for you to not want your girlfrind to care about a colleague.
Update: You all work at the same job and that colleague is beloved by management.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for you to not want your girlfrind to care about a colleague.
Update: The colleague is known to flirt with everyone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for you to not want your girlfrind to care about a colleague.
Update: They're trying to help the colleague.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for you to not want your girlfrind to care about a colleague.
Update: They're getting too close.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for you to not want your girlfrind to care about a colleague.
Update: that colleague has been a close friend for many years.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for you to not want your girlfrind to care about a colleague.
Update: that colleague is an ex-girlfriend/boyfriend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for you to not want your girlfrind to care about a colleague.
Update: They are of the same sex.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for you to not want your girlfrind to care about a colleague.
Update: You think her colleague has feelings for her.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Parents should hire professional entertainers for special occasions instead of their children.
Update: Their children are prodigies.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Parents should hire professional entertainers for special occasions instead of their children.
Update: They can afford it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Parents should hire professional entertainers for special occasions instead of their children.
Update: Their children show a keen interest in being part of the entertainment.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Parents should hire professional entertainers for special occasions instead of their children.
Update: Their children have a fear of performing and don't want to be entertaining.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Parents should hire professional entertainers for special occasions instead of their children.
Update: their children have a special talent they enjoying showing off
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Parents should hire professional entertainers for special occasions instead of their children.
Update: their children are very shy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Parents should hire professional entertainers for special occasions instead of their children.
Update: Their children are professional entertainers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Parents should hire professional entertainers for special occasions instead of their children.
Update: You are looking to hire a professional fire eater.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Parents should hire professional entertainers for special occasions instead of their children.
Update: their children are talented entertainers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Parents should hire professional entertainers for special occasions instead of their children.
Update: the children are being exploited as free labor and do not want to participate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need time for yourself.
Update: You're in the middle of a work shift.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need time for yourself.
Update: You've just lost a loved one.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need time for yourself.
Update: You have committed yourself to plans with someone else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need time for yourself.
Update: You have not had a break in a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need time for yourself.
Update: You are the head of the department at a prestigious college.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need time for yourself.
Update: You just worked back to back twelve hour shifts.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need time for yourself.
Update: You have to take care of a sick person.
Update type: weakener