tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is rude to involve your girlfriend's mom in your breakup.
Update: you've known her for a very long time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to involve your girlfriend's mom in your breakup.
Update: you're just doing it to hurt your girlfriend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to have an intervention when someone is behaving badly.
Update: they don't want to be helped.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to have an intervention when someone is behaving badly.
Update: they have it rock bottom.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to have an intervention when someone is behaving badly.
Update: The person turns violent when confronted.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to have an intervention when someone is behaving badly.
Update: The person is receptive to advice.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to have an intervention when someone is behaving badly.
Update: it can be handled in a more delicate manner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to have an intervention when someone is behaving badly.
Update: all other ways of communication have failed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to have an intervention when someone is behaving badly.
Update: You are a drug addict.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to have an intervention when someone is behaving badly.
Update: Someone is on drugs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to have an intervention when someone is behaving badly.
Update: unless the bad behavior isn't really illegal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to have an intervention when someone is behaving badly.
Update: they are hurting others with their actions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's presumptuous to tell someone else who they're allowed to host overnight.
Update: You are the landlord.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's presumptuous to tell someone else who they're allowed to host overnight.
Update: You are attending the event.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's presumptuous to tell someone else who they're allowed to host overnight.
Update: you are their parent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's presumptuous to tell someone else who they're allowed to host overnight.
Update: they are not related to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's presumptuous to tell someone else who they're allowed to host overnight.
Update: you're their parent
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's presumptuous to tell someone else who they're allowed to host overnight.
Update: you're merely acquaintances
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's presumptuous to tell someone else who they're allowed to host overnight.
Update: you are in a relationship with that person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's presumptuous to tell someone else who they're allowed to host overnight.
Update: the person they host is a family member.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's presumptuous to tell someone else who they're allowed to host overnight.
Update: there are strict rules governing this.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's presumptuous to tell someone else who they're allowed to host overnight.
Update: you are not the host.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is a bad idea to take medication differently than how it is prescribed.
Update: you get permission from the doctor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is a bad idea to take medication differently than how it is prescribed.
Update: you want to avoid bad side effects.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is a bad idea to take medication differently than how it is prescribed.
Update: You are a medical doctor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is a bad idea to take medication differently than how it is prescribed.
Update: You don't know anything about medication.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is a bad idea to take medication differently than how it is prescribed.
Update: you are a medical professional and know what you are doing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is a bad idea to take medication differently than how it is prescribed.
Update: the medication can have dangerous effects.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is a bad idea to take medication differently than how it is prescribed.
Update: you are temporarily travelling.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is a bad idea to take medication differently than how it is prescribed.
Update: the medication has negative side effects.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is a bad idea to take medication differently than how it is prescribed.
Update: You were told by someone from the doctor's office to change your dosage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is a bad idea to take medication differently than how it is prescribed.
Update: It can cause cause severe adverse reactions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to think that your child will comment on a social media post.
Update: it is to cyber bully another person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to think that your child will comment on a social media post.
Update: that person does not have much support from others in life
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to think that your child will comment on a social media post.
Update: your child is too young to be on social media.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to think that your child will comment on a social media post.
Update: if the post directly involves them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to think that your child will comment on a social media post.
Update: They are still a toddler.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to think that your child will comment on a social media post.
Update: They have their own phone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to think that your child will comment on a social media post.
Update: you don't allow them online
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to think that your child will comment on a social media post.
Update: the have the poster friended
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to think that your child will comment on a social media post.
Update: Your child doesn't follow you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to think that your child will comment on a social media post.
Update: Your child follows you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Spending a lot of money on a gift for someone doesn't mean they'll like it.
Update: The item is something on their wish list.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Spending a lot of money on a gift for someone doesn't mean they'll like it.
Update: The item is not returnable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Spending a lot of money on a gift for someone doesn't mean they'll like it.
Update: You put in a lot of thought to the gift.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Spending a lot of money on a gift for someone doesn't mean they'll like it.
Update: You put in no thought to the gift.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Spending a lot of money on a gift for someone doesn't mean they'll like it.
Update: it's something they've specifically asked for.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Spending a lot of money on a gift for someone doesn't mean they'll like it.
Update: you don't know what their tastes are.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Spending a lot of money on a gift for someone doesn't mean they'll like it.
Update: They asked for it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Spending a lot of money on a gift for someone doesn't mean they'll like it.
Update: It was secretly a gift for yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Spending a lot of money on a gift for someone doesn't mean they'll like it.
Update: They have asked for a specific gift and the cost is already expected.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Spending a lot of money on a gift for someone doesn't mean they'll like it.
Update: The receiver of the gift has asked you to make them a gift instead of spending money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Using location services on a phone is helpful in emergencies.
Update: one is already in walking distance of a hospital or first responder
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Using location services on a phone is helpful in emergencies.
Update: one is in a remote area and needs assistance
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Using location services on a phone is helpful in emergencies.
Update: you are lost.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Using location services on a phone is helpful in emergencies.
Update: You're in the basement level of a building.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Using location services on a phone is helpful in emergencies.
Update: You're on the side of the road without a cross street nearby.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Using location services on a phone is helpful in emergencies.
Update: they forgot to take their phone with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Using location services on a phone is helpful in emergencies.
Update: the person is unable to speak.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Using location services on a phone is helpful in emergencies.
Update: the person leaves the phone at home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Using location services on a phone is helpful in emergencies.
Update: the person is alone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think something is rude and disrespectful.
Update: you were the one who was rude and disrespectful.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think something is rude and disrespectful.
Update: they were offensive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think something is rude and disrespectful.
Update: It could put your employment in jeopardy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think something is rude and disrespectful.
Update: Someone is giving you critical feedback.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think something is rude and disrespectful.
Update: Someone is yelling at you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think something is rude and disrespectful.
Update: the person didn't know any better.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think something is rude and disrespectful.
Update: the person was being mean on purpose.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think something is rude and disrespectful.
Update: They are trying to help you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think something is rude and disrespectful.
Update: They are trying to shame you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One parent should not expect the other to do a majority of the caretaking.
Update: They are a stay at home parent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One parent should not expect the other to do a majority of the caretaking.
Update: They both have jobs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One parent should not expect the other to do a majority of the caretaking.
Update: the other parent works long hours
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One parent should not expect the other to do a majority of the caretaking.
Update: both parents work equal amounts
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One parent should not expect the other to do a majority of the caretaking.
Update: They have a mutual agreement where this is the case
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One parent should not expect the other to do a majority of the caretaking.
Update: One of the spouses that is not helping as much has alot of free time
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One parent should not expect the other to do a majority of the caretaking.
Update: that parent doesn't work full time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One parent should not expect the other to do a majority of the caretaking.
Update: they both work full time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One parent should not expect the other to do a majority of the caretaking.
Update: The other is busy working all the time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One parent should not expect the other to do a majority of the caretaking.
Update: Both parents are working.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to value your interests more than money.
Update: you are unable to pay your bills
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to value your interests more than money.
Update: you are able to afford your lifestyle
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to value your interests more than money.
Update: you need money to feed your family.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to value your interests more than money.
Update: you have money to spare.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to value your interests more than money.
Update: You don't have enough money for food.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to value your interests more than money.
Update: You already have money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to value your interests more than money.
Update: You are an accountant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to value your interests more than money.
Update: You work as a teacher.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to value your interests more than money.
Update: you aren't able to pay your bills.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to value your interests more than money.
Update: you have ample income.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to visit your family.
Update: They all have a very contagious stomach virus and you don't want to get sick.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to visit your family.
Update: Your family member has cancer and is slowly dying.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to visit your family.
Update: your family doesn't want you there.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to visit your family.
Update: you don't get to see them very often
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to visit your family.
Update: your family members are abusive
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to visit your family.
Update: your family members are nearing the end of their life
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to visit your family.
Update: they mistreat you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to visit your family.
Update: they are in need of support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to visit your family.
Update: You have a dysfunctional family.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to visit your family.
Update: You know they need your support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to see other people without your significant other knowing.
Update: You both agreed to seeing other people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to see other people without your significant other knowing.
Update: You are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to see other people without your significant other knowing.
Update: You are seeing them for professional reasons.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to see other people without your significant other knowing.
Update: You are seeing them in a sexual way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to see other people without your significant other knowing.
Update: the other people are just friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to see other people without your significant other knowing.
Update: you really love your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to see other people without your significant other knowing.
Update: it's someone who's helping you plan a big surprise for them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to see other people without your significant other knowing.
Update: you or the other person have romantic feelings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to see other people without your significant other knowing.
Update: you've made plans to see friends last minute
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to see other people without your significant other knowing.
Update: you're seeing someone as more then friends
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to want intimacy in a relationship.
Update: You are just using people for sex and nothing emotional
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to want intimacy in a relationship.
Update: You are a loving person who wants the best for someone else
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to want intimacy in a relationship.
Update: you two are living separately.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to want intimacy in a relationship.
Update: you are a married couple.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to want intimacy in a relationship.
Update: All you want is sex.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to want intimacy in a relationship.
Update: You are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to want intimacy in a relationship.
Update: The relationship is a professional one.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to want intimacy in a relationship.
Update: The relationship is a sexual one.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to want intimacy in a relationship.
Update: the relationship is casual.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to want intimacy in a relationship.
Update: you are in a committed relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be snooping on other people's personal lives.
Update: The other people are your children and you suspect they're in danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be snooping on other people's personal lives.
Update: You have been told repeatedly to mind your own business.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be snooping on other people's personal lives.
Update: It could help save their lives
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be snooping on other people's personal lives.
Update: They have told you to respect their privacy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be snooping on other people's personal lives.
Update: you have good reason to believe something is wrong.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be snooping on other people's personal lives.
Update: you don't want people snooping in yours.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be snooping on other people's personal lives.
Update: They are doing something dangerous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be snooping on other people's personal lives.
Update: They are not up to anything wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be snooping on other people's personal lives.
Update: you suspect your partner is cheating on you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be snooping on other people's personal lives.
Update: they never gave you a reason not to trust them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't have rape dreams about people.
Update: you are a healthy, normal person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't have rape dreams about people.
Update: you would never do anything like that in real life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't have rape dreams about people.
Update: you tend to not make the best decisions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't have rape dreams about people.
Update: You are in REM sleep and have no control over your dreams.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't have rape dreams about people.
Update: You have a personality disorder that will make you more likely to act on your dreams.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't have rape dreams about people.
Update: You're trying to process a bad memory about being raped.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't have rape dreams about people.
Update: You're a normal, healthy person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to avoid people who don't respect or love you for who you are.
Update: The people work at a grocery store and are stranger to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to avoid people who don't respect or love you for who you are.
Update: The people are being abusive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to avoid people who don't respect or love you for who you are.
Update: you have to work with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to avoid people who don't respect or love you for who you are.
Update: you have problems with self confidence.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to avoid people who don't respect or love you for who you are.
Update: You have to work side by side with them every day for a living.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to avoid people who don't respect or love you for who you are.
Update: You are suffering from depression.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to avoid people who don't respect or love you for who you are.
Update: They are your boss.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to avoid people who don't respect or love you for who you are.
Update: They speak down to you, constantly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to avoid people who don't respect or love you for who you are.
Update: they are little children who don't understand that.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to avoid people who don't respect or love you for who you are.
Update: they make you feel bad.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to change your mind about having someone at your birthday.
Update: that someone is your mother.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to change your mind about having someone at your birthday.
Update: they were disruptive last year.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to change your mind about having someone at your birthday.
Update: that person is known for things like stealing
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to change your mind about having someone at your birthday.
Update: you know they are broke
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to change your mind about having someone at your birthday.
Update: That person is already at the party
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to change your mind about having someone at your birthday.
Update: That person slept with your girlfriend
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to change your mind about having someone at your birthday.
Update: The reason is because you are being selfish
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to change your mind about having someone at your birthday.
Update: The reason is because that person has done something terrible to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to change your mind about having someone at your birthday.
Update: That someone invited you to their birthday.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to change your mind about having someone at your birthday.
Update: That someone is a drug addict.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is custom to change your name after being adopted.
Update: you want to keep your game because it reflects your heritage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is custom to change your name after being adopted.
Update: your new parents would be very hurt if you didn't.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is custom to change your name after being adopted.
Update: The child wishes to keep their original name.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is custom to change your name after being adopted.
Update: The child wants to forget about their old life and move on with a new one.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is custom to change your name after being adopted.
Update: You feel especially proud of your heritage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is custom to change your name after being adopted.
Update: you want to show your parents you're part of the family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is custom to change your name after being adopted.
Update: you wish to keep your original name.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is custom to change your name after being adopted.
Update: you wish to honor your adoptive parents.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is custom to change your name after being adopted.
Update: You dislike the family who adopted you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is custom to change your name after being adopted.
Update: You've become close with your adopted family..
Update type: strengthener