tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not raise your child in a civilized way.
Update: You are part of an African tribe.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not raise your child in a civilized way.
Update: You want them to be a productive member of society.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not raise your child in a civilized way.
Update: You live in the jungle in the Amazon.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not raise your child in a civilized way.
Update: You live in a suburb in the United States.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't run to the cops after personal issues.
Update: The personal issues resulted in harm to you or someone else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't run to the cops after personal issues.
Update: The personal issues are a simple couple's argument.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't run to the cops after personal issues.
Update: Your safety is in danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't run to the cops after personal issues.
Update: It can be worked out on your own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't run to the cops after personal issues.
Update: Someone has committed a violent crime.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't run to the cops after personal issues.
Update: You are involved in petty disputes.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't run to the cops after personal issues.
Update: You are in great danger and need help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't run to the cops after personal issues.
Update: The issues are about not having enough dishes for dinner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't run to the cops after personal issues.
Update: It is life threatening.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't run to the cops after personal issues.
Update: Other dangerous people are involved.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It can be hurtful to inform a sibling you aren't willing to do something which would mean a lot to them.
Update: They know what they're asking can cause you great pain.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It can be hurtful to inform a sibling you aren't willing to do something which would mean a lot to them.
Update: You have promised them you would do this with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It can be hurtful to inform a sibling you aren't willing to do something which would mean a lot to them.
Update: You have the flu.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It can be hurtful to inform a sibling you aren't willing to do something which would mean a lot to them.
Update: They are willing to do things that mean a lot to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It can be hurtful to inform a sibling you aren't willing to do something which would mean a lot to them.
Update: The sibling gave you the okay not to help them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It can be hurtful to inform a sibling you aren't willing to do something which would mean a lot to them.
Update: The sibling needed you to drive them to the hospital.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It can be hurtful to inform a sibling you aren't willing to do something which would mean a lot to them.
Update: You are in bed with a fever.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It can be hurtful to inform a sibling you aren't willing to do something which would mean a lot to them.
Update: You made a promise that you would do it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It can be hurtful to inform a sibling you aren't willing to do something which would mean a lot to them.
Update: Your sibling is asking you to do something illegal for them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It can be hurtful to inform a sibling you aren't willing to do something which would mean a lot to them.
Update: Your sibling was counting on you to save their life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to take the time to help educate family members.
Update: They are not interested in being educated.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to take the time to help educate family members.
Update: They need to learn something very important that could help them in a life or death situation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to take the time to help educate family members.
Update: They are just copying you instead of trying to learn.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to take the time to help educate family members.
Update: They have a learning disability.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to take the time to help educate family members.
Update: They don't value the lessons you wish to give.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to take the time to help educate family members.
Update: They will make good use of what you have to teach.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to take the time to help educate family members.
Update: they don't require any further instruction.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to take the time to help educate family members.
Update: they need help and support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to take the time to help educate family members.
Update: You are trying to teach them how to commit crimes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to take the time to help educate family members.
Update: Helping them will provide a better life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is childish to refuse to see an ex if it is a civil situation.
Update: That ex made you fear for your life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is childish to refuse to see an ex if it is a civil situation.
Update: You parted on fairly amicable terms.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is childish to refuse to see an ex if it is a civil situation.
Update: Your ex was abusive toward you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is childish to refuse to see an ex if it is a civil situation.
Update: You and your ex have children together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is childish to refuse to see an ex if it is a civil situation.
Update: Your current spouse would be jealous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is childish to refuse to see an ex if it is a civil situation.
Update: You have joint custody of the kids.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is childish to refuse to see an ex if it is a civil situation.
Update: The ex was toxic
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is childish to refuse to see an ex if it is a civil situation.
Update: You need to return their things
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is childish to refuse to see an ex if it is a civil situation.
Update: They don’t let you see your kid
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is childish to refuse to see an ex if it is a civil situation.
Update: They want to be friends
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners should not threaten each other.
Update: The partner is going to harm one of the children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Partners should not threaten each other.
Update: They are in front of the children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners should not threaten each other.
Update: They are being serious.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners should not threaten each other.
Update: They are law-abiding people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners should not threaten each other.
Update: The threat involves something inconsequential.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Partners should not threaten each other.
Update: The threat involves personal safety and wellbeing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners should not threaten each other.
Update: One is hurting the other
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Partners should not threaten each other.
Update: You want the relationship to last
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect something you spend money on to last.
Update: You spent your money on food.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect something you spend money on to last.
Update: You spent your money on an expensive jacket.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect something you spend money on to last.
Update: it is an amusement park ride that ends very quickly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect something you spend money on to last.
Update: it is a durable good product with a lifetime warranty.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect something you spend money on to last.
Update: You bought a fast food meal
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect something you spend money on to last.
Update: You're buying electronics
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect something you spend money on to last.
Update: it's buying an experience rather than a tangible item
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect something you spend money on to last.
Update: you don't know when your next paycheck will come.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect something you spend money on to last.
Update: It's an experience.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect something you spend money on to last.
Update: It cost a lot of money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should open up to others.
Update: The others are unkind, manipulative people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should open up to others.
Update: You're in a romantic relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should open up to others.
Update: You know those people aren't trustworthy and will share your secrets.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should open up to others.
Update: You're in group therapy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should open up to others.
Update: You feel opening up will reveal things that are too personal to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should open up to others.
Update: Getting someone's perspective will be very helpful to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should open up to others.
Update: They gossip about you behind your back.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should open up to others.
Update: You are speaking to a therapist.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should open up to others.
Update: You are not comfortable with it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should open up to others.
Update: You need someone to talk to.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should learn to share things with your roommates.
Update: unless your roommates are habitual thieves
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should learn to share things with your roommates.
Update: you constantly borrow things from your roommates
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should learn to share things with your roommates.
Update: They are stealing your items
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should learn to share things with your roommates.
Update: You want to have a cohesive living arrangement
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should learn to share things with your roommates.
Update: you can not afford to share.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should learn to share things with your roommates.
Update: they want to share with you too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should learn to share things with your roommates.
Update: They are stingy with you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should learn to share things with your roommates.
Update: You all contribute equally to pay for living expenses.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should learn to share things with your roommates.
Update: The things are for personal grooming.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should learn to share things with your roommates.
Update: The appliances were bought with roommates chipping in an equal amount.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not follow through with plans.
Update: Changing plans does not let anyone down.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not follow through with plans.
Update: People are counting on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not follow through with plans.
Update: A family emergency comes up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not follow through with plans.
Update: The plans are important to your family members.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not follow through with plans.
Update: No one other than yourself would be affected.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not follow through with plans.
Update: Others are counting on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not follow through with plans.
Update: You got into a car accident that wasn't your fault.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not follow through with plans.
Update: Someone is paying for you to be a part of the plan.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not follow through with plans.
Update: You realize the plans are doomed to failure.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at someone when they're mocking a person who is dying.
Update: The person who is dying is a serial killer.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at someone when they're mocking a person who is dying.
Update: The person dying is their parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at someone when they're mocking a person who is dying.
Update: The person who is dying is a notorious dictator.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at someone when they're mocking a person who is dying.
Update: The person who is dying is a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at someone when they're mocking a person who is dying.
Update: it is in a movie and is supposed to be a satire.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at someone when they're mocking a person who is dying.
Update: it is somebody very close to that person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at someone when they're mocking a person who is dying.
Update: the person is a villain in a movie
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at someone when they're mocking a person who is dying.
Update: the person is crying for help
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at someone when they're mocking a person who is dying.
Update: The dying person thinks it's funny and enjoys the laughs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset at someone when they're mocking a person who is dying.
Update: The dying person is hurt by it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people to shorten your name.
Update: They are a child that is still learning to talk.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people to shorten your name.
Update: You do not like the sounds of the nickname.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people to shorten your name.
Update: They have trouble pronouncing it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people to shorten your name.
Update: You take pride in the name you were given
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people to shorten your name.
Update: your full name is hard to pronounce.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people to shorten your name.
Update: your name can't be shortened becaues it is already so short.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people to shorten your name.
Update: Your name won't fit on the name tag.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people to shorten your name.
Update: Your full name is deeply meaningful to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people to shorten your name.
Update: You've always been know by the diminutive of your full name.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people to shorten your name.
Update: You don't know them well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should mind your own business.
Update: It could end up affecting your own well being.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should mind your own business.
Update: It has nothing to do with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should mind your own business.
Update: something going on nearby is starting to effect you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should mind your own business.
Update: People you don't know nearby are yelling.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should mind your own business.
Update: Someone is in danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should mind your own business.
Update: No one wants your help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should mind your own business.
Update: Someone badly needs help and you would have to get involved to give them that help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should mind your own business.
Update: There is no reason for you to get involved.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should mind your own business.
Update: You see a strange man offering candy to a group of children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should mind your own business.
Update: Your married friends are bickering with each other the way they often do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is appropriate to block anyone you want to for your privacy on social media.
Update: You are a child who wants to bock your parents.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is appropriate to block anyone you want to for your privacy on social media.
Update: You are underage.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is appropriate to block anyone you want to for your privacy on social media.
Update: They are your spouse or children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is appropriate to block anyone you want to for your privacy on social media.
Update: You have been stalked or harassed by those people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is appropriate to block anyone you want to for your privacy on social media.
Update: You're in a group that prohibits blocking moderating members and you block a moderator.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is appropriate to block anyone you want to for your privacy on social media.
Update: You have people you don't know trying to talk to you online.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is appropriate to block anyone you want to for your privacy on social media.
Update: it's your boss and you've been told that blocking them is against company policy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is appropriate to block anyone you want to for your privacy on social media.
Update: you are worried about stalkers.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is appropriate to block anyone you want to for your privacy on social media.
Update: You are an elected official and use the channel for official business.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is appropriate to block anyone you want to for your privacy on social media.
Update: If they are trolls and are abusive to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to hold people who act unethically responsible for their actions
Update: They are not capable of being responsible for their own actions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to hold people who act unethically responsible for their actions
Update: They are elected public servants.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to hold people who act unethically responsible for their actions
Update: The unethical act saves many people's lives.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to hold people who act unethically responsible for their actions
Update: You need to punish them to show that the act is harmful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to hold people who act unethically responsible for their actions
Update: It is going to cause you more harm than good to do so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to hold people who act unethically responsible for their actions
Update: They are in a position of power.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to hold people who act unethically responsible for their actions
Update: They are clinically insane and do not know what they are doing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to hold people who act unethically responsible for their actions
Update: They are adults and of sound mind.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to hold people who act unethically responsible for their actions
Update: The person didn't know what they were doing because they are disabled.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to hold people who act unethically responsible for their actions
Update: The unethical action caused harm to someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that trust takes time to build.
Update: Your friend already trusts them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that trust takes time to build.
Update: The person you are trusting did something wrong before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that trust takes time to build.
Update: you are a newborn and have no choice but to trust your caretaker.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that trust takes time to build.
Update: you have broken that trust once before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that trust takes time to build.
Update: You're a naturally trusting person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that trust takes time to build.
Update: You have broken someone's trust.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that trust takes time to build.
Update: gives you no reason not to trust them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that trust takes time to build.
Update: the relationship is new.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that trust takes time to build.
Update: The person you're building trust with is already trusted by everyone you know.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that trust takes time to build.
Update: You and the other woman know nothing about each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for what you believe in to your parents.
Update: You would get disowned or kicked out of the house before you are ready to move out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for what you believe in to your parents.
Update: You feel the issue is very important and your parents will understand.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for what you believe in to your parents.
Update: Your beliefs will cause great distress to your parents with little necessity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for what you believe in to your parents.
Update: Your parents are plainly wrong in their stance.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for what you believe in to your parents.
Update: You are a child and think you should be allowed to only eat candy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for what you believe in to your parents.
Update: Your parents are racist and you are not.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for what you believe in to your parents.
Update: what you believe in is dangerous to your heath or safety.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for what you believe in to your parents.
Update: You know their beliefs are wrong and unhealthy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for what you believe in to your parents.
Update: You are a two year old.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for what you believe in to your parents.
Update: They don't support gay marriage and you are gay.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you should pick up after your pet.
Update: You have a pet rock.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you should pick up after your pet.
Update: You live in a city.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you should pick up after your pet.
Update: You live out on a field and encourage them to go on the grass.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you should pick up after your pet.
Update: You walk your pet around the neighborhood.
Update type: strengthener