tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is rude to break a promise.
Update: they were really counting on you to be able to repair the car
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to others.
Update: They've been hurt by those people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to others.
Update: They're among friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to others.
Update: Others are taking advantage of our kindness and hurting us.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to others.
Update: They want others to be kind to them too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to others.
Update: The person is being very rude to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to others.
Update: They are a teacher talking to young children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to others.
Update: People are taking advantage of them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to others.
Update: A person is suffering.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to others.
Update: They are defending their own lives.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to others.
Update: They are peacefully protesting.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should report someone that is abusing kids.
Update: You can step in and help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should report someone that is abusing kids.
Update: They are too young to talk.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should report someone that is abusing kids.
Update: You're unable to access the outside world.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should report someone that is abusing kids.
Update: You have a working phone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should report someone that is abusing kids.
Update: Social services would put them in a foster home that's even worse.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should report someone that is abusing kids.
Update: The kid asks to be taken away to a new family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should report someone that is abusing kids.
Update: You are a mandatory reporter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should report someone that is abusing kids.
Update: It is your own child
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is polite to consider someone who is trying to make amends.
Update: You're a stranger and have no business in their life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is polite to consider someone who is trying to make amends.
Update: It's your friend trying to become close friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is polite to consider someone who is trying to make amends.
Update: They are just trying to get money from you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is polite to consider someone who is trying to make amends.
Update: They have only made a mistake once
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is polite to consider someone who is trying to make amends.
Update: The person killed someone you love.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is polite to consider someone who is trying to make amends.
Update: The person truly feels remorse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is polite to consider someone who is trying to make amends.
Update: They abused you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is polite to consider someone who is trying to make amends.
Update: They are sober.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is polite to consider someone who is trying to make amends.
Update: They are doing so to trick you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is polite to consider someone who is trying to make amends.
Update: They are sincere in doing so.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should have sex more in your relationship to spice things up.
Update: You don’t think your partner is attractive anymore
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should have sex more in your relationship to spice things up.
Update: You want to make them happy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should have sex more in your relationship to spice things up.
Update: You're both asexual.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should have sex more in your relationship to spice things up.
Update: You've not been having a lot of sex.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should have sex more in your relationship to spice things up.
Update: Your wife has just given birth.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should have sex more in your relationship to spice things up.
Update: You have been neglecting each others needs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should have sex more in your relationship to spice things up.
Update: You do not feel comfortable in the relationship yet
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should have sex more in your relationship to spice things up.
Update: You want to make your intimate bond stronger
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to smoke.
Update: you want to have a high quality of life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to smoke.
Update: You are smoking meat
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to smoke.
Update: You already have breathing problems
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to smoke.
Update: You are a cancer patient smoking medical marijuana to get an appetite.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to smoke.
Update: You already have lung cancer or COPD.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to smoke.
Update: You are smoking a turkey.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to smoke.
Update: You have asthma.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to smoke.
Update: Unless you are smoking marijuana for medicinal purposes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to smoke.
Update: Especially if you live with children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get mad at your siblings.
Update: They steal from you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get mad at your siblings.
Update: They are darlings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get mad at your siblings.
Update: Your siblings have hurt you over and over and are abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get mad at your siblings.
Update: They love you dearly and are good, honest people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get mad at your siblings.
Update: they have done something to really test your patience.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get mad at your siblings.
Update: your siblings don't get mad at you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get mad at your siblings.
Update: They break your property to spite you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get mad at your siblings.
Update: They're trying to help you as best as they can.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get mad at your siblings.
Update: Your siblings routinely exclude you from family functions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get mad at your siblings.
Update: Your siblings always include you in activities.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to take your kids places you do not want to go.
Update: Your phobia will put them in danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to take your kids places you do not want to go.
Update: You want them to be brave.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to take your kids places you do not want to go.
Update: Those places are not safe for children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to take your kids places you do not want to go.
Update: Those places are educational.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to take your kids places you do not want to go.
Update: they've been acting up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to take your kids places you do not want to go.
Update: they haven't been taken to do anything fun for awhile.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to take your kids places you do not want to go.
Update: You don't want to go to those places because they're dangerous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to take your kids places you do not want to go.
Update: They're places like kids' museums and Chuck E. Cheese's.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to take your kids places you do not want to go.
Update: They violate your moral principals.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be willing to take your kids places you do not want to go.
Update: It is good clean family fun.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't take away someone's door.
Update: You are going to replace or repair it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't take away someone's door.
Update: They are a married couple trying to have children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't take away someone's door.
Update: You want to be an abusive parent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't take away someone's door.
Update: You don't want to be an abusive parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't take away someone's door.
Update: The person has been harming themself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't take away someone's door.
Update: The person has been asking f or more privacy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't take away someone's door.
Update: You need to replace it with one that's not broken.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't take away someone's door.
Update: They're a teenager.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't take away someone's door.
Update: They are going through puberty
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't fire someone for no good reason.
Update: Your company is bankrupt
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't fire someone for no good reason.
Update: They are your top performer
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't fire someone for no good reason.
Update: Unless you are closing your business.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't fire someone for no good reason.
Update: Especially if they are a good employee.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't fire someone for no good reason.
Update: they were stealing from the company.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't fire someone for no good reason.
Update: they have dirt on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't fire someone for no good reason.
Update: Your company has to downsize or go out of business.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't fire someone for no good reason.
Update: You're firing them based on a legally protected demographic trait.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't fire someone for no good reason.
Update: The employee is always on time and does a great job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't destroy things.
Update: You're working on a demolition  crew.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't destroy things.
Update: You're supposed to be repairing something.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't destroy things.
Update: You are planning to rebuild your home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't destroy things.
Update: You can't afford to fix it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't destroy things.
Update: You have a job as a demolition worker
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't destroy things.
Update: They belong to others
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't destroy things.
Update: You work for a wrecking company.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't destroy things.
Update: They don't belong to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't destroy things.
Update: You're a demolition worker.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't destroy things.
Update: The things belong to a friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should communicate more with your in-laws about giving gifts to your kids.
Update: They always buy useful school clothes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should communicate more with your in-laws about giving gifts to your kids.
Update: They buy age inappropriate gifts.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should communicate more with your in-laws about giving gifts to your kids.
Update: they are rich.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should communicate more with your in-laws about giving gifts to your kids.
Update: they igve gifts to manipulate your kids.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should communicate more with your in-laws about giving gifts to your kids.
Update: You are estranged.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should communicate more with your in-laws about giving gifts to your kids.
Update: They spoil your kids.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should communicate more with your in-laws about giving gifts to your kids.
Update: You are asking them to buy more expensive gifts.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should communicate more with your in-laws about giving gifts to your kids.
Update: They have bought them age inappropriate gifts in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should communicate more with your in-laws about giving gifts to your kids.
Update: They give appropriately
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should communicate more with your in-laws about giving gifts to your kids.
Update: They give too much
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sleeping with people to get a promotion or advantage at work is frowned upon.
Update: You work with your spouse.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Sleeping with people to get a promotion or advantage at work is frowned upon.
Update: You work at a big company.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sleeping with people to get a promotion or advantage at work is frowned upon.
Update: You and your husband own a business together.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Sleeping with people to get a promotion or advantage at work is frowned upon.
Update: The person is married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sleeping with people to get a promotion or advantage at work is frowned upon.
Update: you step on everyone to get ahead.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sleeping with people to get a promotion or advantage at work is frowned upon.
Update: you work in the porn industry
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Sleeping with people to get a promotion or advantage at work is frowned upon.
Update: you work at a church
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sleeping with people to get a promotion or advantage at work is frowned upon.
Update: You are caught.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should eave other peoples relationshops betwen them.
Update: they ask for your help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should eave other peoples relationshops betwen them.
Update: it has nothing to do with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should eave other peoples relationshops betwen them.
Update: You only know one of the parties
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should eave other peoples relationshops betwen them.
Update: You are a marriage counselor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should eave other peoples relationshops betwen them.
Update: You are causing problems in their relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people who share living space consult each other on major changes in the use of space.
Update: one person actually owns the living space.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people who share living space consult each other on major changes in the use of space.
Update: all costs and items are split evenly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people who share living space consult each other on major changes in the use of space.
Update: The other person is a child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people who share living space consult each other on major changes in the use of space.
Update: The other person is your spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people who share living space consult each other on major changes in the use of space.
Update: one person is paying for the space.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people who share living space consult each other on major changes in the use of space.
Update: they want to have a harmonious relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people who share living space consult each other on major changes in the use of space.
Update: you are planning a big surprise in the living space.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people who share living space consult each other on major changes in the use of space.
Update: you know a small change will upset other people who use the space.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people who share living space consult each other on major changes in the use of space.
Update: Parents are buying new furniture for the house.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people who share living space consult each other on major changes in the use of space.
Update: Everyone splits bills.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to of expected more from someone when something they got for you let you down.
Update: Do you want to show that you still appreciate them getting you a gift
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to of expected more from someone when something they got for you let you down.
Update: You specifically told them what you wanted
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to of expected more from someone when something they got for you let you down.
Update: They aren’t wealthy
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to of expected more from someone when something they got for you let you down.
Update: It was your partners gift
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to of expected more from someone when something they got for you let you down.
Update: you are just being materialistic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to of expected more from someone when something they got for you let you down.
Update: you got them an amazing gift.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to of expected more from someone when something they got for you let you down.
Update: You lost out on an opportunity because of this
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to follow through on obligations.
Update: you accepted way too many obligations that can be possibly done
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to follow through on obligations.
Update: you are being paid to finish it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to follow through on obligations.
Update: There is a medical emergency that prevents you from doing so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to follow through on obligations.
Update: You are a business professional working with clients.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to follow through on obligations.
Update: You are in a bad accident that leaves you in a coma.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to follow through on obligations.
Update: You have made a promise to one of your children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to follow through on obligations.
Update: you become ill and are unable to complete your obligations.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to follow through on obligations.
Update: these obligations are made to your children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to follow through on obligations.
Update: you unwillingly signed up for those obligations
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to follow through on obligations.
Update: especially if those obligations are your children
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to go to your child's job interview.
Update: You know the company owner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to go to your child's job interview.
Update: You look disheveled.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to go to your child's job interview.
Update: They forgot an important document.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to go to your child's job interview.
Update: They are in their thirties.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to go to your child's job interview.
Update: Your child is above 18
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to go to your child's job interview.
Update: You are driving them to the interview.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to go to your child's job interview.
Update: They are 40.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to go to your child's job interview.
Update: The child is under-aged and interviewing for an acting position.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to go to your child's job interview.
Update: The child is an adult.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want to engage in something that causes you emotional distress.
Update: it is part of your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want to engage in something that causes you emotional distress.
Update: you can easily avoid it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want to engage in something that causes you emotional distress.
Update: You're undergoing desensitization therapy to deal with your phobia.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want to engage in something that causes you emotional distress.
Update: It's easy for you to avoid the triggers for your emotional distress.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want to engage in something that causes you emotional distress.
Update: You are a police officer and are doing your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want to engage in something that causes you emotional distress.
Update: It is not an activity that you have to do if you don't want to.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want to engage in something that causes you emotional distress.
Update: You are going to therapy to move past it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want to engage in something that causes you emotional distress.
Update: You have PTSD.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want to engage in something that causes you emotional distress.
Update: The thing is a life saving measure.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want to engage in something that causes you emotional distress.
Update: The thing is intimacy with someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore beggars.
Update: they are rude to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore beggars.
Update: you have plenty of extra spending money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore beggars.
Update: They are aggressive
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore beggars.
Update: You know one is a friend of yours
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore beggars.
Update: You have no money for them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore beggars.
Update: You have money or food you could share.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore beggars.
Update: They are being obnoxious to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore beggars.
Update: They are suffering on the street in the rain.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore beggars.
Update: You know they have more money than you do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore beggars.
Update: You believe in Heaven.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Honesty is generally the best policy.
Update: telling your kid that Santa isn't real will end their love of the holiday.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Honesty is generally the best policy.
Update: your friends partner cheated on them while in your own house
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Honesty is generally the best policy.
Update: it is a little white lie that will make your friend feel better.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Honesty is generally the best policy.
Update: you are in a serious relationship with somebody.
Update type: strengthener