tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: Both partners should contribute equally to a relationship.
Update: They are raising several children together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Both partners should contribute equally to a relationship.
Update: They are of the same age
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Both partners should contribute equally to a relationship.
Update: one has a disability preventing them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Both partners should contribute equally to a relationship.
Update: you have rent as well as bills
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Both partners should contribute equally to a relationship.
Update: One person doesn’t want to be together anymore
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Both partners should contribute equally to a relationship.
Update: You want to get married
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone to give you advice for free.
Update: You get a lawyer to take your case on a pro bono basis.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone to give you advice for free.
Update: You charge high rates for your own services.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone to give you advice for free.
Update: They are your parent or teacher.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone to give you advice for free.
Update: They are your financial adviser.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone to give you advice for free.
Update: They are your parent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone to give you advice for free.
Update: They are your therapist.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone to give you advice for free.
Update: They are offering to mentor you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone to give you advice for free.
Update: They are professional consultants
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone to give you advice for free.
Update: They're a family member.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect someone to give you advice for free.
Update: They're a paid professional.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should not judge others based solely on what they hear.
Update: The information is coming from a completely reliable source.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should not judge others based solely on what they hear.
Update: They have opposite first hand information.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should not judge others based solely on what they hear.
Update: They are hearing the information from a police officer.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should not judge others based solely on what they hear.
Update: They are hearing the information from a friend known to gossip.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should not judge others based solely on what they hear.
Update: Everyone has the same opinion
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should not judge others based solely on what they hear.
Update: You never met them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should not judge others based solely on what they hear.
Update: People have told you not to let the person stay with you because they have stolen from each one of them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should not judge others based solely on what they hear.
Update: The people are being gossips
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should not judge others based solely on what they hear.
Update: Unless they heard it from their parents.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should not judge others based solely on what they hear.
Update: It comes from a known liar.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to gossip about people at their wedding.
Update: They are your friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to gossip about people at their wedding.
Update: It's just sweet comments about how you can see how much they love each other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to gossip about people at their wedding.
Update: You want to seem like a good friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to gossip about people at their wedding.
Update: It's positive gossip.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to gossip about people at their wedding.
Update: It would make them feel bad.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to gossip about people at their wedding.
Update: You know the bride had an affair with a groomsman
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to gossip about people at their wedding.
Update: Your best friends are getting married
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to gossip about people at their wedding.
Update: You think something is wrong with the relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to gossip about people at their wedding.
Update: You barely know them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be clear about sexual needs.
Update: You are starting a long term relationship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be clear about sexual needs.
Update: You are talking to people you are not intimate with.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to be clear about sexual needs.
Update: There has been some miscommunication in your relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be clear about sexual needs.
Update: You are not sure what your sexual needs are.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to be clear about sexual needs.
Update: You are getting to know a new partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be clear about sexual needs.
Update: you find that doing so causes issues in the relationship
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to be clear about sexual needs.
Update: you want to have a healthy sexual relationship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be clear about sexual needs.
Update: You want to just leave your partner
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to be clear about sexual needs.
Update: You want to be honest with them about everything
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to look out for your family best interest.
Update: You are an orphan.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to look out for your family best interest.
Update: You are left in charge of the family business.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to look out for your family best interest.
Update: They took care of you when you lost your job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to look out for your family best interest.
Update: It will result in harm to someone else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to look out for your family best interest.
Update: You are the head of your family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to look out for your family best interest.
Update: it gets in the way of yours
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to look out for your family best interest.
Update: they're involved in the decision as well
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to look out for your family best interest.
Update: you are doing so by taking advantage of others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to look out for your family best interest.
Update: it means creating a better future for your children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to not let your girlfriend hang out with your friends if she does something that disrespects your friends.
Update: They did something to disrespect her first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to not let your girlfriend hang out with your friends if she does something that disrespects your friends.
Update: They don't like her.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to not let your girlfriend hang out with your friends if she does something that disrespects your friends.
Update: Your friends say they will leave you if you don't respect this
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to not let your girlfriend hang out with your friends if she does something that disrespects your friends.
Update: your friends are overly sensitive to the thing she did
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to not let your girlfriend hang out with your friends if she does something that disrespects your friends.
Update: your relationship with her struggles as a result of it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to not let your girlfriend hang out with your friends if she does something that disrespects your friends.
Update: She has apologized to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to not let your girlfriend hang out with your friends if she does something that disrespects your friends.
Update: They have asked not to be around her.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to not let your girlfriend hang out with your friends if she does something that disrespects your friends.
Update: Your friends disrespected her first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to not let your girlfriend hang out with your friends if she does something that disrespects your friends.
Update: Your girlfriend does not mind.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to turn down an invitation from someone you don't like.
Update: They are paying for you to be there
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to turn down an invitation from someone you don't like.
Update: They hurt your feelings
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to turn down an invitation from someone you don't like.
Update: It's a family member's wedding.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to turn down an invitation from someone you don't like.
Update: You don't know them very well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to turn down an invitation from someone you don't like.
Update: It's your boss and you know it will be good for networking.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to turn down an invitation from someone you don't like.
Update: The invitation is to do something that makes you feel uncomfortable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to turn down an invitation from someone you don't like.
Update: You know you will have an uncomfortable time there
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to turn down an invitation from someone you don't like.
Update: there is a networking opportunity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to turn down an invitation from someone you don't like.
Update: you have a previous commitment.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to move on when you break up with someone.
Update: Unless you are still in love with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to move on when you break up with someone.
Update: Especially if it's been a while.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to move on when you break up with someone.
Update: You have children with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to move on when you break up with someone.
Update: You broke up because they died.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to move on when you break up with someone.
Update: You want to pursue other romantic interests.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to move on when you break up with someone.
Update: you had been together a long time
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to move on when you break up with someone.
Update: the relationship was not that long
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to move on when you break up with someone.
Update: Your ex is still devastated and you are now dating their friend.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to move on when you break up with someone.
Update: You both know that you will remain friends
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sometimes its acceptable for people without the ability to succeed in anything to bend the truth to boost their self-esteem.
Update: They're lying to get a job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Sometimes its acceptable for people without the ability to succeed in anything to bend the truth to boost their self-esteem.
Update: They run into an old acquaintance from high school.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sometimes its acceptable for people without the ability to succeed in anything to bend the truth to boost their self-esteem.
Update: It leads a youth down a dark path.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Sometimes its acceptable for people without the ability to succeed in anything to bend the truth to boost their self-esteem.
Update: The added confidence will help them get a better job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sometimes its acceptable for people without the ability to succeed in anything to bend the truth to boost their self-esteem.
Update: It harms others
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Sometimes its acceptable for people without the ability to succeed in anything to bend the truth to boost their self-esteem.
Update: No one is harmed
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sometimes its acceptable for people without the ability to succeed in anything to bend the truth to boost their self-esteem.
Update: they do so all the time without results to back it up
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Sometimes its acceptable for people without the ability to succeed in anything to bend the truth to boost their self-esteem.
Update: they've only done it once or twice to their benefit
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sometimes its acceptable for people without the ability to succeed in anything to bend the truth to boost their self-esteem.
Update: their lies give them an unfair advantage over more qualified applicants
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Sometimes its acceptable for people without the ability to succeed in anything to bend the truth to boost their self-esteem.
Update: their new found confidence makes them more willing to improve themselves
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to report when something bad is happening.
Update: You don't have enough proof to back your claims.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to report when something bad is happening.
Update: There is a reliable eyewitness on your side.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to report when something bad is happening.
Update: You are reporting it to the incorrect authorities.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to report when something bad is happening.
Update: A violent crime has been committed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to report when something bad is happening.
Update: You are the one doing bad things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to report when something bad is happening.
Update: It is hurting someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to report when something bad is happening.
Update: you have no evidence.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to report when something bad is happening.
Update: it is a danger to people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to report when something bad is happening.
Update: You are using neighborhood watch as an excuse to be nosy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to report when something bad is happening.
Update: You hear your neighbor being hit and are worried about them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to look through someone else's belongings.
Update: Unless it's an emergency.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to look through someone else's belongings.
Update: Especially if you are just being nosy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to look through someone else's belongings.
Update: you're a customs employee at an airport
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to look through someone else's belongings.
Update: you do not have permission to be
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to look through someone else's belongings.
Update: You believe that they stole from you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to look through someone else's belongings.
Update: You are trying to steal from them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to look through someone else's belongings.
Update: You think they are doing drugs
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to look through someone else's belongings.
Update: You should actually trust them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to look through someone else's belongings.
Update: You're trying to find out who left their purse in your restaurant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to look through someone else's belongings.
Update: You're in a new relationship with that person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your roommate got themselves into a stupid situation it is understandable to not care.
Update: You and your roommate are good friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your roommate got themselves into a stupid situation it is understandable to not care.
Update: It happens often.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your roommate got themselves into a stupid situation it is understandable to not care.
Update: They ask for your help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your roommate got themselves into a stupid situation it is understandable to not care.
Update: They regularly do so.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your roommate got themselves into a stupid situation it is understandable to not care.
Update: The situation involves you in some way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your roommate got themselves into a stupid situation it is understandable to not care.
Update: It's none of your  business.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your roommate got themselves into a stupid situation it is understandable to not care.
Update: They got scammed and had no control over it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your roommate got themselves into a stupid situation it is understandable to not care.
Update: They went to jail for criminal behavior.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your roommate got themselves into a stupid situation it is understandable to not care.
Update: the situation affects you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your roommate got themselves into a stupid situation it is understandable to not care.
Update: the situation has nothing to do with you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is classless to swear, even people that do it to you.
Update: You're performing a rap song
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is classless to swear, even people that do it to you.
Update: You're in church
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is classless to swear, even people that do it to you.
Update: you do not swear at other people
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is classless to swear, even people that do it to you.
Update: you swear to other peoples faces blatantly
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is classless to swear, even people that do it to you.
Update: You are especially angry.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is classless to swear, even people that do it to you.
Update: you are in a professional setting.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is classless to swear, even people that do it to you.
Update: you are an actor reciting lines in a play
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is classless to swear, even people that do it to you.
Update: you chastise other people when they swear
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is classless to swear, even people that do it to you.
Update: You're at a sporting event where rivalry is fun.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is classless to swear, even people that do it to you.
Update: You work with children for a living.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to judge people for how many people of the opposite sex they interact with.
Update: They have expressed interest in having an extramarital affair with all of them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to judge people for how many people of the opposite sex they interact with.
Update: You also have acquaintances of the opposite sex
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to judge people for how many people of the opposite sex they interact with.
Update: They are mean to every person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to judge people for how many people of the opposite sex they interact with.
Update: That person is your spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to judge people for how many people of the opposite sex they interact with.
Update: They sleep with all of them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to judge people for how many people of the opposite sex they interact with.
Update: They just have a lot of friends
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to judge people for how many people of the opposite sex they interact with.
Update: It is your spouse.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to judge people for how many people of the opposite sex they interact with.
Update: They work with a lot of people of the opposite sex.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to judge people for how many people of the opposite sex they interact with.
Update: Those people are only friends of theirs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to acknowledge that you need directions.
Update: you're drunk and the only person available to ask is a cop
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to acknowledge that you need directions.
Update: you're lost
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to acknowledge that you need directions.
Update: You are in a place where you have never been
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to acknowledge that you need directions.
Update: You are in an unfamiliar city.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to acknowledge that you need directions.
Update: You claim to be a self starter.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to acknowledge that you need directions.
Update: You want to do a good job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to acknowledge that you need directions.
Update: you are in a competition and you have to do it on your own to win.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to acknowledge that you need directions.
Update: you have been lost for 4 hours and it's getting dark.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to volunteer.
Update: It's for being a crash test dummy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to volunteer.
Update: You want to help your local community.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to volunteer.
Update: Unless you are only doing it to show off.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to volunteer.
Update: Especially if you are needed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to volunteer.
Update: You are burned out and tired
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to volunteer.
Update: You have a passion or hobby you can apply to this
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to volunteer.
Update: you can't afford the time to do so
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to volunteer.
Update: you have spare time to do so
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to volunteer.
Update: You volunteer for bad causes
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to volunteer.
Update: You are helping the needy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be pushy when it comes to sex.
Update: Your spouse welcomes it as part of their kink
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be pushy when it comes to sex.
Update: Your partner is not feeling up to the act
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be pushy when it comes to sex.
Update: Your partner never wants to have sex
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be pushy when it comes to sex.
Update: You just met someone
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be pushy when it comes to sex.
Update: you are role playing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be pushy when it comes to sex.
Update: the other person tells you no.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be pushy when it comes to sex.
Update: Your partner has been raped before
Update type: strengthener