tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: You have a right to be upset when your wife insults you.
Update: You did nothing to deserve the insult.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be upset when your wife insults you.
Update: your behavior was deserving of criticism
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be upset when your wife insults you.
Update: it is part of a regular pattern of conduct
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be upset when your wife insults you.
Update: your wife was making an obviously harmless joke.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be upset when your wife insults you.
Update: Your wife insulted something she knew you were insecure about.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be upset when your wife insults you.
Update: She has dementia.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be upset when your wife insults you.
Update: She knows how it will hurt you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to pay for a mistake.
Update: The mistake was breaking a friend's crystal vase.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to pay for a mistake.
Update: An employee surprised your child and caused them to drop a vase.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to pay for a mistake.
Update: You are looking for forgiveness in a twelve step program.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to pay for a mistake.
Update: It was an accident.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to pay for a mistake.
Update: You didn't pay attention and it's entirely your fault.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to pay for a mistake.
Update: It was someone that knew exactly how to do something correctly but, they didn't care.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to pay for a mistake.
Update: the mistake was your own fault.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to pay for a mistake.
Update: if it was not your own mistake
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to pay for a mistake.
Update: You made the mistake.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to not want to pay for a mistake.
Update: You did not make the mistake in question.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be forgiving, not vindictive, with the people in your life.
Update: Those people have been trying to ruin your life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be forgiving, not vindictive, with the people in your life.
Update: You want them to stay in your life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be forgiving, not vindictive, with the people in your life.
Update: People have wronged you so badly they cannot be forgiven.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be forgiving, not vindictive, with the people in your life.
Update: You want to be like Jesus Christ.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be forgiving, not vindictive, with the people in your life.
Update: Your brother pranked you and you are expected to do so in return.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be forgiving, not vindictive, with the people in your life.
Update: The event that caused the issue was a mistake.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be forgiving, not vindictive, with the people in your life.
Update: The person hurts you physically for no reason
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be forgiving, not vindictive, with the people in your life.
Update: They are family and they admitted making a mistake
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be forgiving, not vindictive, with the people in your life.
Update: The people are abusive toward you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be forgiving, not vindictive, with the people in your life.
Update: The people make amends when they wrong you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to expect you will be paid back if someone says they will pay you back.
Update: The person to whom you lent money is now on the run from the police.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to expect you will be paid back if someone says they will pay you back.
Update: You lent money to someone who is very responsible.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to expect you will be paid back if someone says they will pay you back.
Update: You owe the other person money too.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to expect you will be paid back if someone says they will pay you back.
Update: The person signed a contract promising to repay you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to expect you will be paid back if someone says they will pay you back.
Update: You know that they are having a hard time financially.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to expect you will be paid back if someone says they will pay you back.
Update: They have paid you back in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to expect you will be paid back if someone says they will pay you back.
Update: They have fallen on hard times and lost their house.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to expect you will be paid back if someone says they will pay you back.
Update: They have gotten a raise and a promotion.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to expect you will be paid back if someone says they will pay you back.
Update: that person has covered you in the past and never asked for repayment.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to expect you will be paid back if someone says they will pay you back.
Update: you agreed to terms before you loaned them money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't directly point at someone, it can be considered rude
Update: You are picking them out if an audience for a prize
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't directly point at someone, it can be considered rude
Update: You are giggling as well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't directly point at someone, it can be considered rude
Update: you are pointing out a criminal to the police
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't directly point at someone, it can be considered rude
Update: you are making fun of a foreigner
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't directly point at someone, it can be considered rude
Update: You are giving a press briefing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't directly point at someone, it can be considered rude
Update: You are drinking heavily in a bar.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't directly point at someone, it can be considered rude
Update: You are trying an auctioneer calling out bidders
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't directly point at someone, it can be considered rude
Update: You don't know them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't directly point at someone, it can be considered rude
Update: You're a witness in court and were told to do so by the prosecutor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't directly point at someone, it can be considered rude
Update: You don't want them to start a fight with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to communicate with your family on important issues.
Update: They don't listen to what you have to say.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to communicate with your family on important issues.
Update: They always listen to what you have to say.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to communicate with your family on important issues.
Update: You disowned your family
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to communicate with your family on important issues.
Update: Your family takes care of you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to communicate with your family on important issues.
Update: They are keeping some things a secret
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to communicate with your family on important issues.
Update: The family wants to keep their bond
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to communicate with your family on important issues.
Update: Your family has asked you to leave them alone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to communicate with your family on important issues.
Update: You're close with your family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to communicate with your family on important issues.
Update: You are the juror in a court case.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to communicate with your family on important issues.
Update: You seek friendly advice on what to do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is disappointing to leave people behind.
Update: They ask to be left.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is disappointing to leave people behind.
Update: They ask you for help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is disappointing to leave people behind.
Update: they do not want to come with.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is disappointing to leave people behind.
Update: they were looking for your help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is disappointing to leave people behind.
Update: Those people constantly undermined you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is disappointing to leave people behind.
Update: You really enjoyed talking and joking with those people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is disappointing to leave people behind.
Update: Those people wanted to be left behind.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is disappointing to leave people behind.
Update: You could have brought them with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is disappointing to leave people behind.
Update: You're in a race
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is disappointing to leave people behind.
Update: You promised you'd finish together
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is juvenile to communicate with notes.
Update: You are leaving love notes for your partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is juvenile to communicate with notes.
Update: The notes contain passive aggressive writing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is juvenile to communicate with notes.
Update: You're communicating with someone who's deaf.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is juvenile to communicate with notes.
Update: The notes are about who you have a crush on.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is juvenile to communicate with notes.
Update: what you're communicating is a secret.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is juvenile to communicate with notes.
Update: you're supposed to be doing something else.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is juvenile to communicate with notes.
Update: The internet is down
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is juvenile to communicate with notes.
Update: The teacher catches you in the middle of class doing it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is juvenile to communicate with notes.
Update: You are in a library.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is juvenile to communicate with notes.
Update: You are at home on the couch with your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to bring dishonor to a deceased loved one.
Update: The deceased loved one was especially kind to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to bring dishonor to a deceased loved one.
Update: The deceased person wanted you to seek honor by killing your sister for marrying someone from a different religion.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to bring dishonor to a deceased loved one.
Update: The deceased loved one wanted you to protect and provide for your living family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to bring dishonor to a deceased loved one.
Update: They were cruel and harmful towards you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to bring dishonor to a deceased loved one.
Update: They helped you a great deal during their life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to bring dishonor to a deceased loved one.
Update: You find out they killed someone
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to bring dishonor to a deceased loved one.
Update: You loved them and cared about them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to bring dishonor to a deceased loved one.
Update: The loved one you are talking about liked crass humor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to bring dishonor to a deceased loved one.
Update: The loved one you are talking about died in a traumatic way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to profit on the talents of others.
Update: you are hired to make them more money, like a manager
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to profit on the talents of others.
Update: they aren't getting a cut of the profit you make
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to profit on the talents of others.
Update: You are a manager of show business people as your employment.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to profit on the talents of others.
Update: You don't have their best interests at heart.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to profit on the talents of others.
Update: they work at a company you own.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to profit on the talents of others.
Update: you are taking advantage of them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to profit on the talents of others.
Update: You share the profits with the person who is performing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to profit on the talents of others.
Update: You don't share any profits with the performer
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to profit on the talents of others.
Update: You are poor and need to feed your kids.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to profit on the talents of others.
Update: The person is poor and needs the money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to date casually.
Update: You are married and not in an open relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to date casually.
Update: You are single.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to date casually.
Update: a person you are dating has told you they want an exclusive relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to date casually.
Update: you are young, not yet ready to settle down, and alert your partners of your intentions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to date casually.
Update: you're already in a relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to date casually.
Update: you're young and don't know what you want.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to date casually.
Update: You are already married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to date casually.
Update: You are single and open to relationships.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to date casually.
Update: You are married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to date casually.
Update: You are responsible.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to split things financially when two people agree they are needed and live together.
Update: One of the people makes much more money at the present time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to split things financially when two people agree they are needed and live together.
Update: They both make the same amount of money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to split things financially when two people agree they are needed and live together.
Update: One person is still in school and one has a great job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to split things financially when two people agree they are needed and live together.
Update: Both people are capable of providing for themselves.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to split things financially when two people agree they are needed and live together.
Update: One insists on doing things that they both can't afford.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to split things financially when two people agree they are needed and live together.
Update: Both can afford the split.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to split things financially when two people agree they are needed and live together.
Update: One person has no real income to speak of.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to split things financially when two people agree they are needed and live together.
Update: Both people have equal incomes.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to split things financially when two people agree they are needed and live together.
Update: it is over their budget.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to split things financially when two people agree they are needed and live together.
Update: they will provide basic needs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be mad if your romantic partner isn't fully committed to you.
Update: Unless you knew he was married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be mad if your romantic partner isn't fully committed to you.
Update: Especially if he wants to date you AND others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be mad if your romantic partner isn't fully committed to you.
Update: You've been cheating on them with someone else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be mad if your romantic partner isn't fully committed to you.
Update: You've been monogamous with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be mad if your romantic partner isn't fully committed to you.
Update: You are in the beginning stages of the relationship and it's not exclusive yet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be mad if your romantic partner isn't fully committed to you.
Update: You've been together for a while and the understanding was exclusivity.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be mad if your romantic partner isn't fully committed to you.
Update: You are in an open relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be mad if your romantic partner isn't fully committed to you.
Update: You are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be mad if your romantic partner isn't fully committed to you.
Update: You have only been dating for a few weeks.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be mad if your romantic partner isn't fully committed to you.
Update: You have just celebrated your 20th wedding anniversary.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to make an effort with your significant other's family.
Update: They hate you for no reason
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to make an effort with your significant other's family.
Update: You want to marry them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to make an effort with your significant other's family.
Update: Your significant other doesn't like their own family to begin with.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to make an effort with your significant other's family.
Update: You are going to marry your significant other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to make an effort with your significant other's family.
Update: they openly hate you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to make an effort with your significant other's family.
Update: they want to get to know you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to make an effort with your significant other's family.
Update: They live in another country and do not have a telephone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to make an effort with your significant other's family.
Update: They are new in town and need someone to show them around.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to make an effort with your significant other's family.
Update: Their family will never accept you because they're homophobic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to make an effort with your significant other's family.
Update: The family has made many efforts to welcome you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with others even if it reveals something they might not want to hear.
Update: they dont want you to tell them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with others even if it reveals something they might not want to hear.
Update: they really want you to be honest.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with others even if it reveals something they might not want to hear.
Update: It is their wedding night.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with others even if it reveals something they might not want to hear.
Update: The revelation will lead to a healthier way of living.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with others even if it reveals something they might not want to hear.
Update: Your intent is to hurt them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with others even if it reveals something they might not want to hear.
Update: They ask you for the truth.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with others even if it reveals something they might not want to hear.
Update: It is something that might destroy their life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with others even if it reveals something they might not want to hear.
Update: It has to do with their family's health.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with others even if it reveals something they might not want to hear.
Update: They are not in the proper head space to receive the news.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be honest with others even if it reveals something they might not want to hear.
Update: You want to be seen as an honest and trustworthy friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be sexist.
Update: You're portraying sexism for a school project.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be sexist.
Update: You're practicing sexism at work as an employer.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be sexist.
Update: You have faced sexism towards yourself
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be sexist.
Update: You care about others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be sexist.
Update: You are teaching a sexual harassment class.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be sexist.
Update: You are setting an example to children or others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to forbid your child from spending time with specific people.
Update: The people are their only friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to forbid your child from spending time with specific people.
Update: The people are trying to make your child do illegal acts.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to forbid your child from spending time with specific people.
Update: The person you don't like just saved your child's life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to forbid your child from spending time with specific people.
Update: They are ten years older than your child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to forbid your child from spending time with specific people.
Update: the people are helping your child become a better person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to forbid your child from spending time with specific people.
Update: the people are criminals
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to forbid your child from spending time with specific people.
Update: The person you're forbidding them from seeing is one of their guardians.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to forbid your child from spending time with specific people.
Update: the people being forbidden from seeing your children are violent offenders.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to forbid your child from spending time with specific people.
Update: Your child is 18.
Update type: weakener