tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's wrong to break up with someone after someone close to them dies.
Update: They don’t see it coming
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to break up with someone after someone close to them dies.
Update: They hadn't seen the person that died in forty years.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to break up with someone after someone close to them dies.
Update: They are still crying every night.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to break up with someone after someone close to them dies.
Update: The two of you were ready to part ways before the death.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to break up with someone after someone close to them dies.
Update: You care about their mental condition after the break up.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to break up with someone after someone close to them dies.
Update: You were both planning on breaking up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to break up with someone after someone close to them dies.
Update: You were friends with the deceased.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to break up with someone after someone close to them dies.
Update: The person you're breaking up with killed their close friend.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to break up with someone after someone close to them dies.
Update: The person is extremely distraught.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for people to wear ear buds in public.
Update: They are walking into an intersection and can't hear and oncoming ambulance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for people to wear ear buds in public.
Update: They are on a morning jog in the park.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for people to wear ear buds in public.
Update: You are trying to have a conversation with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for people to wear ear buds in public.
Update: They are just sitting alone on a bus.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for people to wear ear buds in public.
Update: They are walking in the middle of traffic
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for people to wear ear buds in public.
Update: They are listening to music, as nobody want to year other people's music
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for people to wear ear buds in public.
Update: They are crossing a busy intersection.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for people to wear ear buds in public.
Update: They are walking in a park.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for people to wear ear buds in public.
Update: The people are crossing guards.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable for people to wear ear buds in public.
Update: The people are commuters.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to be honest with your family members
Update: You're playing a game of poker.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to be honest with your family members
Update: Someone's health is at risk.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to be honest with your family members
Update: The truth will break your family up
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to be honest with your family members
Update: You love them very much
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to be honest with your family members
Update: You want a drama free relationship with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to be honest with your family members
Update: you are trying to surprise them with a vacation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to be honest with your family members
Update: they are honest with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to be honest with your family members
Update: Your family members will have a nervous breakdown.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to be honest with your family members
Update: Your family members will feel relieved.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to give people your opinion.
Update: No one has asked for it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to give people your opinion.
Update: You are a judge
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to give people your opinion.
Update: You know everyone will disagree with you because it is racist
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to give people your opinion.
Update: You are on a news broadcast
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to give people your opinion.
Update: your opinion is wrong
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to give people your opinion.
Update: you are a politician running for president
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to give people your opinion.
Update: You want to contradict your boss.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to give people your opinion.
Update: You were asked for it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to give people your opinion.
Update: They said not to talk to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to give people your opinion.
Update: You can relate and help them out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Children are expected to act politely towards their parents.
Update: Guests are present.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Children are expected to act politely towards their parents.
Update: Their parent might be walking into quicksand.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Children are expected to act politely towards their parents.
Update: They are at a formal function.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Children are expected to act politely towards their parents.
Update: Their parents embarrass them in front of their friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Children are expected to act politely towards their parents.
Update: Their parents drive them to school every day.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Children are expected to act politely towards their parents.
Update: The parents didn't teach their children manners.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Children are expected to act politely towards their parents.
Update: The parents taught their children about respecting others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Children are expected to act politely towards their parents.
Update: Their parents aren't involved in their lives.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Children are expected to act politely towards their parents.
Update: The children live with their parents.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's considered compassionate to take care of a girlfriend that is crying.
Update: the girlfriend is crying because she cheated on you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's considered compassionate to take care of a girlfriend that is crying.
Update: she finds comfort in your care
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's considered compassionate to take care of a girlfriend that is crying.
Update: She is laughing so hard it has led to tears.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's considered compassionate to take care of a girlfriend that is crying.
Update: She has no other friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's considered compassionate to take care of a girlfriend that is crying.
Update: she is crying tears of joy at a wedding.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's considered compassionate to take care of a girlfriend that is crying.
Update: she has just suffered the loss of a parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's considered compassionate to take care of a girlfriend that is crying.
Update: She is sobbing over the person she just murdered in cold blood.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's considered compassionate to take care of a girlfriend that is crying.
Update: She just lost her best friend in an accident.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's considered compassionate to take care of a girlfriend that is crying.
Update: She is crying because she got caught cheating.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's considered compassionate to take care of a girlfriend that is crying.
Update: You accidentally slammed her finger in the car door.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to expand your horizons.
Update: You are a young child and can only have a limited area to play in.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to expand your horizons.
Update: Your surroundings are making you bored.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to expand your horizons.
Update: You are both agoraphobic and neophobic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to expand your horizons.
Update: You had a sheltered upbringing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to expand your horizons.
Update: You are very socially anxious and awkward
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to expand your horizons.
Update: You want to succeed in life
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to expand your horizons.
Update: You're trying something dangerous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to expand your horizons.
Update: You're trying something cultural.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to expand your horizons.
Update: you are already in over your head
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to expand your horizons.
Update: you need to find a new job
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be more careful at the gym.
Update: You want to get hurt.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be more careful at the gym.
Update: You want to avoid an injury.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be more careful at the gym.
Update: You are a gold medalist training for a big competition.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be more careful at the gym.
Update: You have little training in lifting heavy weights.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be more careful at the gym.
Update: You know what you are doing
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be more careful at the gym.
Update: You have an injury
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be more careful at the gym.
Update: You are running the track fast
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be more careful at the gym.
Update: You want to make sure you dont hurt someone
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be more careful at the gym.
Update: You're the janitor cleaning up after everyone has left.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be more careful at the gym.
Update: The gym is crowded.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your family to help you out with favors.
Update: They owe you a lot of favors.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your family to help you out with favors.
Update: You're being unreasonable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your family to help you out with favors.
Update: you are always willing to help them out when they ask.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your family to help you out with favors.
Update: you don't help them out when they ask.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your family to help you out with favors.
Update: you always help them out when they need it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your family to help you out with favors.
Update: they live far away from you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your family to help you out with favors.
Update: you help them out with favors.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your family to help you out with favors.
Update: you never help them out with favors.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your family to help you out with favors.
Update: They already owe you an outstanding debt.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your family to help you out with favors.
Update: You're old enough to live on your own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never be critical of a gift someone gave you.
Update: The gift was very inappropriate or profane.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never be critical of a gift someone gave you.
Update: It was a handmade gift from a young child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never be critical of a gift someone gave you.
Update: You've been re gifted something you've already given.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never be critical of a gift someone gave you.
Update: The gift is a homemade item.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never be critical of a gift someone gave you.
Update: It is something offensive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never be critical of a gift someone gave you.
Update: They spent a lot of time picking it out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never be critical of a gift someone gave you.
Update: It is broken.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never be critical of a gift someone gave you.
Update: You can find some use for it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never be critical of a gift someone gave you.
Update: you are sure the giver is out of earshot.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never be critical of a gift someone gave you.
Update: the gift was kind and thoughtful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are allowed to stand up for yourself.
Update: it is forbidden by law in the country you live in.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are allowed to stand up for yourself.
Update: you want to stand up for yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are allowed to stand up for yourself.
Update: You are in the wrong
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are allowed to stand up for yourself.
Update: You are being bullied
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are allowed to stand up for yourself.
Update: You are wrong in an argument.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are allowed to stand up for yourself.
Update: You have been physically assaulted.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are allowed to stand up for yourself.
Update: You agreed to let your husband take the wheels on this decision.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are allowed to stand up for yourself.
Update: You know you made the right decision by turning your friend in to the police.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are allowed to stand up for yourself.
Update: you are directed to sit quietly in a courtroom.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are allowed to stand up for yourself.
Update: someone is accusing you of doing something wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: is it bad to assume that someone cannot understand something simple
Update: The person is severely developmentally delayed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: is it bad to assume that someone cannot understand something simple
Update: You're basing your assumptions on their gender.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: is it bad to assume that someone cannot understand something simple
Update: The person is a smart adult that should know how to boil water.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: is it bad to assume that someone cannot understand something simple
Update: It is a young child that is still learning how the world works.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: is it bad to assume that someone cannot understand something simple
Update: You have not spoken to them before
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: is it bad to assume that someone cannot understand something simple
Update: They have disability.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: is it bad to assume that someone cannot understand something simple
Update: they have indicated that they do not understand
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: is it bad to assume that someone cannot understand something simple
Update: they are an adult
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: is it bad to assume that someone cannot understand something simple
Update: They are a young child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: is it bad to assume that someone cannot understand something simple
Update: You are talking to a coworker.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should talk with a friend if a behavior of theirs is annoying you.
Update: it is a nervous tic that they know about and can't control it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should talk with a friend if a behavior of theirs is annoying you.
Update: they can easily change it and you haven't pointed it out before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should talk with a friend if a behavior of theirs is annoying you.
Update: It is their odd laugh.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should talk with a friend if a behavior of theirs is annoying you.
Update: They are annoying you in public.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should talk with a friend if a behavior of theirs is annoying you.
Update: They are coping with a distressing personal situation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should talk with a friend if a behavior of theirs is annoying you.
Update: The behavior could endanger their health.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should talk with a friend if a behavior of theirs is annoying you.
Update: You realize it is just you being overly touchy that day.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should talk with a friend if a behavior of theirs is annoying you.
Update: You have to spend a great deal of time with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should talk with a friend if a behavior of theirs is annoying you.
Update: You think they're not aware of how you think of it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to call out of work for no reason.
Update: You have never missed work and everyone else has taken many sick days.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to call out of work for no reason.
Update: Your colleagues are counting on you to help with a presentation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to call out of work for no reason.
Update: You are being bullied and need a day away from the toxic culture.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to call out of work for no reason.
Update: Your place of work would be severely shorthanded without you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to call out of work for no reason.
Update: its a family emergency
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to call out of work for no reason.
Update: you cant afford to loose the pay
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to call out of work for no reason.
Update: you are self-employed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to call out of work for no reason.
Update: it puts a burden on your coworkers.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to call out of work for no reason.
Update: You do not have to give a reason for calling off per company policy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to call out of work for no reason.
Update: It is required to give a reason, such as being sick.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a rebound relationship.
Update: You are not over your ex.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a rebound relationship.
Update: You don't want to be lonely.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a rebound relationship.
Update: you are already in another relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a rebound relationship.
Update: you both are single and get along
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a rebound relationship.
Update: You're only using the person in it and know you're not really interested in them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a rebound relationship.
Update: The rebound relationship could be real and you really like the person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a rebound relationship.
Update: It's with someone you'd normally never agree to date.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a rebound relationship.
Update: You don't take it too seriously.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a rebound relationship.
Update: Unless it's going to hurt someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a rebound relationship.
Update: Especially if it helps you heal.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Trust issues can hurt a relationship.
Update: the relationship isn't taken seriously
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Trust issues can hurt a relationship.
Update: the people in the relationship are married
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Trust issues can hurt a relationship.
Update: The issues stem from cheating
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Trust issues can hurt a relationship.
Update: it's the first time in ever.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Trust issues can hurt a relationship.
Update: the relationship has just started its journey
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Trust issues can hurt a relationship.
Update: Unless both partners agree the relationship is casual and open.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Trust issues can hurt a relationship.
Update: The relationship is already in trouble.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Trust issues can hurt a relationship.
Update: the couple works hard to address them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Trust issues can hurt a relationship.
Update: one person constantly accuses another.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should always accept responsibility for their actions.
Update: they are being framed
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should always accept responsibility for their actions.
Update: you caused somebody financial loss
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should always accept responsibility for their actions.
Update: That person is mentally ill.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should always accept responsibility for their actions.
Update: That person is a mature adult.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should always accept responsibility for their actions.
Update: They were under the command of a senior officer.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should always accept responsibility for their actions.
Update: It resulted in an injury to a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should always accept responsibility for their actions.
Update: Someone blamed you for something that wasn't your fault.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should always accept responsibility for their actions.
Update: You care about your reputation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should always accept responsibility for their actions.
Update: They are irresponsible
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should always accept responsibility for their actions.
Update: They hurt someone else
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Not wanting to tip when you get bad service is natural.
Update: You know the service issues weren't the server's fault.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Not wanting to tip when you get bad service is natural.
Update: Your server was inattentive and rude.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Not wanting to tip when you get bad service is natural.
Update: a tip is required.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Not wanting to tip when you get bad service is natural.
Update: the staff was rude.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Not wanting to tip when you get bad service is natural.
Update: You know the waiter
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Not wanting to tip when you get bad service is natural.
Update: The waiter is very rude
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Not wanting to tip when you get bad service is natural.
Update: The employee apologizes sincerely and makes things right immediately.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Not wanting to tip when you get bad service is natural.
Update: The staff member is rude as well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Not wanting to tip when you get bad service is natural.
Update: The waitress was a young single mother.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Not wanting to tip when you get bad service is natural.
Update: The food had mold on it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be patient with children.
Update: The children act unruly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be patient with children.
Update: You are teaching them a hard subject.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be patient with children.
Update: There is a fire in the building and you are trying to get everyone out.
Update type: weakener