tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset with your son for being close with his father after he cheated on you.
Update: You want your son to have a good relationship with their father.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset with your son for being close with his father after he cheated on you.
Update: The father is trying to teach your son bad manners.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset with your son for being close with his father after he cheated on you.
Update: Your anger is changing their view on their father.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset with your son for being close with his father after he cheated on you.
Update: The father and son have a good relationship and he doesn't want to change that.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset with your son for being close with his father after he cheated on you.
Update: The father has used money to win the child's favor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset with your son for being close with his father after he cheated on you.
Update: Unless his father abuses him.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset with your son for being close with his father after he cheated on you.
Update: Especially if he's a good father.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset with your son for being close with his father after he cheated on you.
Update: Your son doesn't know about the infidelity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset with your son for being close with his father after he cheated on you.
Update: Your son knows that his father c heated on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to smoke indoors when other people are present.
Update: they are all smoking too
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to smoke indoors when other people are present.
Update: some of the others have asthma.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to smoke indoors when other people are present.
Update: you're sitting in a section of the building for smokers
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to smoke indoors when other people are present.
Update: none of the other people around you are smokers
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to smoke indoors when other people are present.
Update: Everyone there is a smoker.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to smoke indoors when other people are present.
Update: There is a baby in the room.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to smoke indoors when other people are present.
Update: You are in a smoking room.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to smoke indoors when other people are present.
Update: There are kids present.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to smoke indoors when other people are present.
Update: You are in a smoke shop and the other people are all smoking too.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to smoke indoors when other people are present.
Update: Anyone present has respiratory issues.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't reject someone because they're born in Israel.
Update: you wish to be fair to all persons you encounter
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't reject someone because they're born in Israel.
Update: You have stubborn family that refuses to let you date someone from there
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't reject someone because they're born in Israel.
Update: You are Israeli yourself
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't reject someone because they're born in Israel.
Update: They are a racist, mean person, who hates all others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't reject someone because they're born in Israel.
Update: They're kind and compassionate and love all.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't reject someone because they're born in Israel.
Update: Your religion requires it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't reject someone because they're born in Israel.
Update: You were born there too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't reject someone because they're born in Israel.
Update: You were also born in Israel.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be respectful of your partner.
Update: They cheated on you with your brother.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be respectful of your partner.
Update: They manage your daily schedule.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be respectful of your partner.
Update: Your partner has lost your trust by being unfaithful.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be respectful of your partner.
Update: You have been through thick and thin together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be respectful of your partner.
Update: They are being rude to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be respectful of your partner.
Update: They just lost someone they loved.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be respectful of your partner.
Update: You are trying to leave them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be respectful of your partner.
Update: You are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be respectful of your partner.
Update: They cheated on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be respectful of your partner.
Update: They treat you with respect.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to stay home with you.
Update: They are deployed with the military.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to stay home with you.
Update: You are sick in bed with a fever.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to stay home with you.
Update: They have an important work meeting.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to stay home with you.
Update: You are having pregnancy contractions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to stay home with you.
Update: you just need some alone time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to stay home with you.
Update: you are not feeling well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to stay home with you.
Update: they've obligations which they cannot avoid
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to stay home with you.
Update: they have been going out regularly
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to stay home with you.
Update: Your partner beats you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your significant other to stay home with you.
Update: You don't get to spend a lot of time together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your partner to pay for something they don't want to do.
Update: it is their birthday gift to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your partner to pay for something they don't want to do.
Update: you don't pay for things you don't want to do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your partner to pay for something they don't want to do.
Update: it is for your kids
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your partner to pay for something they don't want to do.
Update: they won't be there
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your partner to pay for something they don't want to do.
Update: they are paying for a life saving surgery
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your partner to pay for something they don't want to do.
Update: paying for the thing goes against their religious beliefs
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your partner to pay for something they don't want to do.
Update: You want them to come along to support you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your partner to pay for something they don't want to do.
Update: They have a real phobia of that particular activity.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your partner to pay for something they don't want to do.
Update: You're paying to support your child
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your partner to pay for something they don't want to do.
Update: It's something that can be done without them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you treat a person with dignity in their final moments.
Update: You are trying to take off their close to hook up medical monitors.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you treat a person with dignity in their final moments.
Update: You are a closer family member to the person who is dying.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you treat a person with dignity in their final moments.
Update: You don't know that the person is about to die.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you treat a person with dignity in their final moments.
Update: You know the person is about to die.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you treat a person with dignity in their final moments.
Update: This person killed your family
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you treat a person with dignity in their final moments.
Update: This person made sacrifices for you in their life
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you treat a person with dignity in their final moments.
Update: You're a soldier killing an enemy combatant
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you treat a person with dignity in their final moments.
Update: You are a priest called to perform last rites
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you treat a person with dignity in their final moments.
Update: They have just committed a murder and turned the gun on themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you treat a person with dignity in their final moments.
Update: They are in a hospice bed surrounded by family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tip if you are unhappy with the service you received.
Update: the waiter apologized and remedied the problem.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tip if you are unhappy with the service you received.
Update: they didn't fix the problem.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tip if you are unhappy with the service you received.
Update: gratuity is required.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tip if you are unhappy with the service you received.
Update: the server was rude to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tip if you are unhappy with the service you received.
Update: The state allows restaurants to pay their servers less than minimum wage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tip if you are unhappy with the service you received.
Update: The servers are already paid a living wage.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tip if you are unhappy with the service you received.
Update: The waiter was not the reason you are unhappy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tip if you are unhappy with the service you received.
Update: The waitress was rude to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tip if you are unhappy with the service you received.
Update: The tip is already included in your bill.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tip if you are unhappy with the service you received.
Update: You are eating out at a fast food restaurant.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not trust strangers.
Update: Those strangers are doctors trying to save your life after an accident.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not trust strangers.
Update: You met them in a dark alley.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not trust strangers.
Update: You've had bad experiences in the past
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not trust strangers.
Update: they are law enforcement in uniform with badges.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not trust strangers.
Update: they claim to know you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not trust strangers.
Update: You need their help for your survival.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not trust strangers.
Update: You have been hurt in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not trust strangers.
Update: They're trusted professionals.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not trust strangers.
Update: You've never heard of them before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for people when someone puts them down.
Update: They have asked you to let them handle their business.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for people when someone puts them down.
Update: You know they need the extra support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for people when someone puts them down.
Update: they are violent and could harm you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for people when someone puts them down.
Update: they can not stick up for themselves.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for people when someone puts them down.
Update: Sticking up for those people would put you in danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for people when someone puts them down.
Update: Those people don't have a lot of people to defend them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for people when someone puts them down.
Update: You get overwhelmed by conflict.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for people when someone puts them down.
Update: Someone is picking on a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for people when someone puts them down.
Update: people are putting them down for doing something horrible to someone else
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to stick up for people when someone puts them down.
Update: the person getting put down is innocent
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to be fair with children.
Update: You  are teaching them that life isn't always fair.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to be fair with children.
Update: They are having a hard time understanding a rule.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to be fair with children.
Update: One of them has a mental disability.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to be fair with children.
Update: They are in kindergarten.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to be fair with children.
Update: You are a teacher who should not show favortism
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to be fair with children.
Update: You want to teach them that life isn't always fair.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to be fair with children.
Update: You have two children you need to provide for equally.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try to be fair with children.
Update: it would harm them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try to be fair with children.
Update: it will instill confidence in them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Fighting with another party goer is rude.
Update: The party is for MMA fighters.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Fighting with another party goer is rude.
Update: The party is for a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Fighting with another party goer is rude.
Update: You are standing up for an innocent victim.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Fighting with another party goer is rude.
Update: The fight is over something petty.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Fighting with another party goer is rude.
Update: They're harassing people and the host wants them kicked out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Fighting with another party goer is rude.
Update: They were quietly minding their own business before you started the fight.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Fighting with another party goer is rude.
Update: they punched you first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Fighting with another party goer is rude.
Update: the party is formal.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Fighting with another party goer is rude.
Update: They threw a drink in your face.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Fighting with another party goer is rude.
Update: It is at a wake.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is fine to confront someone for doing something wrong.
Update: you engage in the same wrong behavior yourself
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is fine to confront someone for doing something wrong.
Update: they are doing something harmful to you or your property
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is fine to confront someone for doing something wrong.
Update: They are the CEO of your company and you would get fired.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is fine to confront someone for doing something wrong.
Update: They are breaking the law.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is fine to confront someone for doing something wrong.
Update: the person is dangerous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is fine to confront someone for doing something wrong.
Update: you are trying to teach them a lesson.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is fine to confront someone for doing something wrong.
Update: What they are doing isn't your business.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is fine to confront someone for doing something wrong.
Update: It's unethical and maybe harmful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is fine to confront someone for doing something wrong.
Update: The confrontation would put you in danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is fine to confront someone for doing something wrong.
Update: The person is your subordinate at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Classmates should help each other.
Update: they are asking you to cheat.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Classmates should help each other.
Update: the work is really hard.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Classmates should help each other.
Update: they're in a test situation
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Classmates should help each other.
Update: they're doing group work
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Classmates should help each other.
Update: They are directed by the teacher to work alone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Classmates should help each other.
Update: They are put into groups to work on a project.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Classmates should help each other.
Update: they are in the middle of taking a test
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Classmates should help each other.
Update: some of them are struggling with the class material
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Classmates should help each other.
Update: the help comes in the form of cheating on tests
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Classmates should help each other.
Update: they expect to be helped themselves
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to tell on others.
Update: They told you that they were going to murder their landlord.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to tell on others.
Update: They re planning a surprise party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to tell on others.
Update: they are breaking the law.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to tell on others.
Update: they are your friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to tell on others.
Update: They are stealing from a store.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to tell on others.
Update: They haven't done anything wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to tell on others.
Update: they did something wrong.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to tell on others.
Update: you are lying.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to tell on others.
Update: They stole from you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to tell on others.
Update: You've done the same behavior yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to betray the trust of a friend.
Update: A friend betrays your trust.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to betray the trust of a friend.
Update: Your friend depends on you for medical support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to betray the trust of a friend.
Update: You're a mandated reporter
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to betray the trust of a friend.
Update: Your friend told you who they like
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to betray the trust of a friend.
Update: you need to tell someone the friend is planning to kill himself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to betray the trust of a friend.
Update: your friend has nobody else they can trust to talk to.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to betray the trust of a friend.
Update: You believe that their safety is in question.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to betray the trust of a friend.
Update: You know the betrayal will hurt them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to betray the trust of a friend.
Update: you have to lie to your friend to save them from danger
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to betray the trust of a friend.
Update: that friend has always had your back
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to cut someone off without explanation.
Update: The other person left the scene and you did not have the chance to esxplain.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to cut someone off without explanation.
Update: You have to talk to the police.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to cut someone off without explanation.
Update: You have to make them realize something's on fire.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to cut someone off without explanation.
Update: You're dismissing their ideas without fully listening to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to cut someone off without explanation.
Update: They won't shut up and you need to say something that will save lives.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to cut someone off without explanation.
Update: They are making a presentation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to cut someone off without explanation.
Update: you don't like them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to cut someone off without explanation.
Update: they have something important to say
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to cut someone off without explanation.
Update: You need to tell them the house is on fire.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to cut someone off without explanation.
Update: You are driving.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should have a joint account with your partner.
Update: They have significantly more debt than you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should have a joint account with your partner.
Update: The bank charges lower rates for joint accounts.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should have a joint account with your partner.
Update: They have stolen money in the past.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should have a joint account with your partner.
Update: You are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should have a joint account with your partner.
Update: you prefer to keep your funds seperate
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should have a joint account with your partner.
Update: you want to make buying household items easy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should have a joint account with your partner.
Update: They are bad with money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should have a joint account with your partner.
Update: You split expenses evenly.
Update type: strengthener