tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to distance yourself from someone who is abusive.
Update: they are your child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to distance yourself from someone who is abusive.
Update: they've taken advantage of you a lot.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to distance yourself from someone who is abusive.
Update: You are planning to correct the relationship
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to distance yourself from someone who is abusive.
Update: It is causing you physical injury
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to distance yourself from someone who is abusive.
Update: The abuse has caused mental health issues and depression.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to distance yourself from someone who is abusive.
Update: You are partnered with the abusive person in harming other people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to distance yourself from someone who is abusive.
Update: The abusive person harms you specifically.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that we respect the views of our parents.
Update: They have racist views that go against the norms of a polite society.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that we respect the views of our parents.
Update: You don't want to be disowned or kicked out of their house.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that we respect the views of our parents.
Update: Our parents are neo-Nazis.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that we respect the views of our parents.
Update: Those views are that we should work hard and get a good education.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that we respect the views of our parents.
Update: they have views that are mean.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that we respect the views of our parents.
Update: they have well intentioned views of things.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that we respect the views of our parents.
Update: You parents are bigots
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that we respect the views of our parents.
Update: Your parents paid for your college and living expenses
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that we respect the views of our parents.
Update: They have been emotionally abusive towards us.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that we respect the views of our parents.
Update: They have just been diagnosed with a serious disease.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break it off with an ex partner if they keep shoving their new partner in your face.
Update: you are married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break it off with an ex partner if they keep shoving their new partner in your face.
Update: they are cheating on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break it off with an ex partner if they keep shoving their new partner in your face.
Update: You have children with your ex.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break it off with an ex partner if they keep shoving their new partner in your face.
Update: They were the one who ended the original relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break it off with an ex partner if they keep shoving their new partner in your face.
Update: You need to work together on a project.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break it off with an ex partner if they keep shoving their new partner in your face.
Update: You are moving far away from them soon.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break it off with an ex partner if they keep shoving their new partner in your face.
Update: you need to maintain a good relationship with your ex partner for business reasons
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break it off with an ex partner if they keep shoving their new partner in your face.
Update: you have no reason to continue the relationship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break it off with an ex partner if they keep shoving their new partner in your face.
Update: You share custody of a child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break it off with an ex partner if they keep shoving their new partner in your face.
Update: You are ready to meet somebody new yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is mean to tell your mother they are not allowed in your home.
Update: Your mother is a drug addict
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is mean to tell your mother they are not allowed in your home.
Update: Your mother is elderly and needs medical help
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is mean to tell your mother they are not allowed in your home.
Update: Your mother's previous behavior has made that type of boundary necessary.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is mean to tell your mother they are not allowed in your home.
Update: You do not tell her why she's not allowed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is mean to tell your mother they are not allowed in your home.
Update: Your mother is a violent drunk.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is mean to tell your mother they are not allowed in your home.
Update: Your mother's home burned down and she needs somewhere to stay.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is mean to tell your mother they are not allowed in your home.
Update: The last time your mom was in your house she stole money from your purse and the jewelry out of your bedroom.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is mean to tell your mother they are not allowed in your home.
Update: They love you more than anyone else in the world and just get a little over affectionate in front of your roommates.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is mean to tell your mother they are not allowed in your home.
Update: Your mother is physically abuse to you or your family.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is mean to tell your mother they are not allowed in your home.
Update: Your mother is widowed and has nowhere to go.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to maintain friendships even while in a romantic relationship with someone.
Update: You have a history of cheating with your friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to maintain friendships even while in a romantic relationship with someone.
Update: You want to have a life outside your relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to maintain friendships even while in a romantic relationship with someone.
Update: The friendships are not healhty.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to maintain friendships even while in a romantic relationship with someone.
Update: You value your friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to maintain friendships even while in a romantic relationship with someone.
Update: You have a desire to cheat on your partner with them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to maintain friendships even while in a romantic relationship with someone.
Update: The friendships existed before your relationship started
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to maintain friendships even while in a romantic relationship with someone.
Update: your partner dislikes a friend for justifiable reasons
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to maintain friendships even while in a romantic relationship with someone.
Update: you are thinking about leaving your partner
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to maintain friendships even while in a romantic relationship with someone.
Update: the friendships are more than just friendships.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to maintain friendships even while in a romantic relationship with someone.
Update: the friendships are the same gender.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Its vengeful to retaliate after being struck.
Update: You are in a boxing match.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Its vengeful to retaliate after being struck.
Update: You retaliate by striking harder than you were struck.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Its vengeful to retaliate after being struck.
Update: Your retaliation was an automatic reaction.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Its vengeful to retaliate after being struck.
Update: Your retaliation was calculated and planned.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Its vengeful to retaliate after being struck.
Update: You are defending your own life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Its vengeful to retaliate after being struck.
Update: You were struck by a child during a tantrum.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Its vengeful to retaliate after being struck.
Update: You pursue legal action as your form of retaliation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Its vengeful to retaliate after being struck.
Update: You retaliate 10 times harder than what happened to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Its vengeful to retaliate after being struck.
Update: the person who stuck you was unprovoked and belligerent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Its vengeful to retaliate after being struck.
Update: you were stuck completely by accident.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore your in-laws.
Update: They are undermining your parenting
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore your in-laws.
Update: They are letting you stay with them for free
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore your in-laws.
Update: They are all drug addicts
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore your in-laws.
Update: They support you and like you very much
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore your in-laws.
Update: You all loathe each other and are much happier avoiding each other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore your in-laws.
Update: They love seeing your kids.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore your in-laws.
Update: they are being very rude to you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore your in-laws.
Update: they want to get along with you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore your in-laws.
Update: Your in-laws are toxic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ignore your in-laws.
Update: Your in-laws are in the same room as you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's illegal to park in handicap spots.
Update: You have a disability
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's illegal to park in handicap spots.
Update: You do not have a disability
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's illegal to park in handicap spots.
Update: You are handicapped
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's illegal to park in handicap spots.
Update: You are a lazy person who is able bodied
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's illegal to park in handicap spots.
Update: You have a relevant disability.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's illegal to park in handicap spots.
Update: You are able-bodied.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's illegal to park in handicap spots.
Update: you have a sticker.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's illegal to park in handicap spots.
Update: you are not handicap.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's illegal to park in handicap spots.
Update: There is a car accident and you must stop immediately to help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's illegal to park in handicap spots.
Update: There is only one handicapped parking spot available.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's boundaries.
Update: They are hurting another person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's boundaries.
Update: You are riding on the Subway.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's boundaries.
Update: They have social anxiety.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's boundaries.
Update: The boundaries are being set by immediate family or intimate partners.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's boundaries.
Update: you are are an army general
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's boundaries.
Update: they requested that you specifically respect it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's boundaries.
Update: You are a police officer trying to arrest someone with a gun.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's boundaries.
Update: You are in a romantic relationship with the person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk back to your parents.
Update: Your parents are cruel towards you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk back to your parents.
Update: Your parents are explaining house rules to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk back to your parents.
Update: you're trying to give them the correct information about the conversation
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk back to your parents.
Update: you're in the wrong and you're just trying to be mean
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk back to your parents.
Update: They are under the influence of alcohol and suggesting crazy things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk back to your parents.
Update: You are at a public charity event.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk back to your parents.
Update: They misunderstood your point.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk back to your parents.
Update: You are yelling.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk back to your parents.
Update: They are verbally abusing you and you are just standing up for yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk back to your parents.
Update: They are just asking for your help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to post a picture of someone without their permission.
Update: You are trying to find a child using Amber Alert
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to post a picture of someone without their permission.
Update: You are taking photos of people in a locker room
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to post a picture of someone without their permission.
Update: They are on the FBI's most wanted list.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to post a picture of someone without their permission.
Update: They asked you not to.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to post a picture of someone without their permission.
Update: the person is missing
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to post a picture of someone without their permission.
Update: it is an embarrassing photo.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to post a picture of someone without their permission.
Update: It's a picture of your baby.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to post a picture of someone without their permission.
Update: They are a private person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to post a picture of someone without their permission.
Update: That person is a famous celebrity at a public appearance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to post a picture of someone without their permission.
Update: That person is a minor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hold onto grudges for too long.
Update: The person you're holding the grudge against has hurt you several times again.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hold onto grudges for too long.
Update: The person you're holding the grudge against has really reformed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hold onto grudges for too long.
Update: someone has murdered your family.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hold onto grudges for too long.
Update: someone is truly trying to make amends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hold onto grudges for too long.
Update: You are trying to outlive someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hold onto grudges for too long.
Update: You have forgotten how it began.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hold onto grudges for too long.
Update: You draw strength from the grudge
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hold onto grudges for too long.
Update: You are getting stressed
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hold onto grudges for too long.
Update: You lost a loved one because of it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to hold onto grudges for too long.
Update: It is bad for your health to hold in feelings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't single out someone to the point where they become ostracized for it.
Update: They are espousing bigoted views.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't single out someone to the point where they become ostracized for it.
Update: They are part of a marginalized group.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't single out someone to the point where they become ostracized for it.
Update: their behavior is immoral or damaging and deserves to be ostracized
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't single out someone to the point where they become ostracized for it.
Update: there is no good reason to criticize the person
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't single out someone to the point where they become ostracized for it.
Update: They are a racist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't single out someone to the point where they become ostracized for it.
Update: They are a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't single out someone to the point where they become ostracized for it.
Update: That person is a neo-Nazi.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't single out someone to the point where they become ostracized for it.
Update: You're singling that person out for something they can't control.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't single out someone to the point where they become ostracized for it.
Update: That person is evil
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't single out someone to the point where they become ostracized for it.
Update: That person is autistic
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate people with their friends.
Update: Your friend's friend has made very rude comments to you and your friend has repeatedly ignored the comments.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate people with their friends.
Update: Your friend is trying hard to make everyone get along
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate people with their friends.
Update: The friends are bad people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate people with their friends.
Update: The friends are good people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate people with their friends.
Update: Unless they are the group leader
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate people with their friends.
Update: You know the person doesnt have the same beliefs as their friends
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate people with their friends.
Update: Their friends are known criminals and you have things constantly coming up missing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate people with their friends.
Update: You don't know anything except  hearsay about them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate people with their friends.
Update: Their friend groups are extremely similar.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate people with their friends.
Update: Their friend groups are very diverse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not support people with mental illness.
Update: A person's ignorance about the conditions of mental illness lie at fault of their poor manners.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not support people with mental illness.
Update: Your bipolar friend is going through a manic phase and has been calling all hours of the day and night, including while with clients.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not support people with mental illness.
Update: They have no other support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not support people with mental illness.
Update: they are complete strangers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not support people with mental illness.
Update: you are a nurse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not support people with mental illness.
Update: You are in immediate danger from a mentally ill person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not support people with mental illness.
Update: You claim to be an ally to mentally ill people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not support people with mental illness.
Update: You have been affected tremendously by someone with a mental illness and are traumatized.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not support people with mental illness.
Update: Mental illness runs in your family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A host offering substandard refreshments is frowned upon.
Update: The party was "bring your own".
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A host offering substandard refreshments is frowned upon.
Update: The host said drinks were on them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A host offering substandard refreshments is frowned upon.
Update: The host is hosting a funeral or wake.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A host offering substandard refreshments is frowned upon.
Update: The host is throwing a party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A host offering substandard refreshments is frowned upon.
Update: It's at someone's house and then can't afford anything else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A host offering substandard refreshments is frowned upon.
Update: It's at a wedding.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A host offering substandard refreshments is frowned upon.
Update: They are too poor to buy more expensive things
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A host offering substandard refreshments is frowned upon.
Update: They are rich and can afford nice drinks
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A host offering substandard refreshments is frowned upon.
Update: It is the only thing the host can afford.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A host offering substandard refreshments is frowned upon.
Update: The host is stingy and selfish to others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is immoral to cause harm to others
Update: You are a soldier.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is immoral to cause harm to others
Update: You value human life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is immoral to cause harm to others
Update: It's a lesser harm than doing nothing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is immoral to cause harm to others
Update: They know they are causing someone else pain.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is immoral to cause harm to others
Update: Doing so would prevent them killing you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is immoral to cause harm to others
Update: They are weak people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is immoral to cause harm to others
Update: The harm was caused by accident.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is immoral to cause harm to others
Update: The harm was caused deliberately.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is immoral to cause harm to others
Update: Someone else is causing you harm and you are defending yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is immoral to cause harm to others
Update: You are harming someone more helpless than you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to date someone casually.
Update: They specifically said they were only looking for a manogamous relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to date someone casually.
Update: You just got out of a long term relationship and you want to see who else is out there.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to date someone casually.
Update: You told them you were exclusive
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to date someone casually.
Update: You just met
Update type: strengthener