tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: You shouldn't talk badly about your friends in front of their other friends.
Update: Your information is out of context.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Roommates should try to work their problems out without stress.
Update: one of them is moving out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Roommates should try to work their problems out without stress.
Update: they want to remain on good terms.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Roommates should try to work their problems out without stress.
Update: The roommate is abusive and violent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Roommates should try to work their problems out without stress.
Update: You do not have enough money to move out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Roommates should try to work their problems out without stress.
Update: Your roommate slept with your partner
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Roommates should try to work their problems out without stress.
Update: You are very good friends with them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Roommates should try to work their problems out without stress.
Update: one roommate is verbally abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Roommates should try to work their problems out without stress.
Update: they are good friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Roommates should try to work their problems out without stress.
Update: An emergency needs to be dealt with.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Roommates should try to work their problems out without stress.
Update: They want to maintain a civil environment.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to blame anything negative you do on being drunk.
Update: Someone drugged you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to blame anything negative you do on being drunk.
Update: You know what you are doing to yourself
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to blame anything negative you do on being drunk.
Update: You are always drunk and an alcoholic
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to blame anything negative you do on being drunk.
Update: You are using it as an excuse
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to blame anything negative you do on being drunk.
Update: You only do bad things when you are drunk.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to blame anything negative you do on being drunk.
Update: You are a jerk even when sober.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to blame anything negative you do on being drunk.
Update: someone forced you to drink.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to blame anything negative you do on being drunk.
Update: you do it all the time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to blame anything negative you do on being drunk.
Update: you don't remember what you did.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to blame anything negative you do on being drunk.
Update: you are truly sorry.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to give your girlfriend an ultimatum.
Update: you have found out that she is cheating on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to give your girlfriend an ultimatum.
Update: you hate receiving ultimatums yourself
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to give your girlfriend an ultimatum.
Update: You want to end the relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to give your girlfriend an ultimatum.
Update: You want her to accept your proposal of marriage.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to give your girlfriend an ultimatum.
Update: you are about to end a relationship
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to give your girlfriend an ultimatum.
Update: she doesn't put the same expectations on you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to give your girlfriend an ultimatum.
Update: She will not listen to reason.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to give your girlfriend an ultimatum.
Update: She is trying to do better for the relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to give your girlfriend an ultimatum.
Update: It is the only way your relationship will survive
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to give your girlfriend an ultimatum.
Update: You know you won't be satisified even if she meets it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: The game allows for cheating.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: You're competing in a tournament.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: You are starving to death.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: You are working with impressionable children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: you really want to win the Monopoly game.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: you're taking college exams.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: You are cheating on the person that you love.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: Your partner has always been faithful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to reject someone.
Update: the rejected person is dangerous
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to reject someone.
Update: you are rejecting them based on their race
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to reject someone.
Update: They said something horrible to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to reject someone.
Update: You know they mean well and treat you kindly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to reject someone.
Update: they are a cruel person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to reject someone.
Update: it is a family member.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to reject someone.
Update: They are being completely horrible to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to reject someone.
Update: They have been there for you all of your life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to reject someone.
Update: They are a stranger asking you out and you're not interested.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to reject someone.
Update: They are your own child asking for help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to part ways with a romantic partner on friendly terms.
Update: Your partner was abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to part ways with a romantic partner on friendly terms.
Update: Your partner is someone you have been friends with for a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to part ways with a romantic partner on friendly terms.
Update: They were physically abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to part ways with a romantic partner on friendly terms.
Update: You mostly broke up because you just drifted apart over time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to part ways with a romantic partner on friendly terms.
Update: The other has cheated on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to part ways with a romantic partner on friendly terms.
Update: You come to a mutual agreement to part.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to part ways with a romantic partner on friendly terms.
Update: One of them was wronged
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to part ways with a romantic partner on friendly terms.
Update: They split up after high school
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to part ways with a romantic partner on friendly terms.
Update: The partner abused you and you are in danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to part ways with a romantic partner on friendly terms.
Update: You have children together and will have to co-parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always help out your coworkers.
Update: they are slacking
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always help out your coworkers.
Update: you're on the same team
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always help out your coworkers.
Update: you are overwhelmed and too busy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always help out your coworkers.
Update: they always help you out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always help out your coworkers.
Update: you have too much work to do
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always help out your coworkers.
Update: you have time to help them out
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always help out your coworkers.
Update: You're competing with them for a promotion.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always help out your coworkers.
Update: The coworkers are new to the job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always help out your coworkers.
Update: They are trying to take your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always help out your coworkers.
Update: They've just come back from time off.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be part of your sibling's events if you want to be there.
Update: You planned the event.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be part of your sibling's events if you want to be there.
Update: They were abusive in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be part of your sibling's events if you want to be there.
Update: You want to maintain a close relationship with your sibling.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be part of your sibling's events if you want to be there.
Update: Your sibling is a source of toxicity in your life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be part of your sibling's events if you want to be there.
Update: your sibling has told you how important it is to them for you to be there.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be part of your sibling's events if you want to be there.
Update: you live a long distance away from where your siblings event is occurring.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be part of your sibling's events if you want to be there.
Update: They are getting married
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be part of your sibling's events if you want to be there.
Update: You were not invited
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to set your own desires for a relationship.
Update: it is a work relationship with set boundaries.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to set your own desires for a relationship.
Update: you want to be happy in the relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to set your own desires for a relationship.
Update: They are totally unrealistic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to set your own desires for a relationship.
Update: You want to be considered as an equal.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to set your own desires for a relationship.
Update: You are a new employee for a company dealing with your boss.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to set your own desires for a relationship.
Update: You are in a loving, mutual relationship with someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to set your own desires for a relationship.
Update: you want to be happy in your relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to set your own desires for a relationship.
Update: your partner wants to do so together
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to set your own desires for a relationship.
Update: you want to be and remain independent
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's a complete betrayal of trust to use a spouse's account without their permission.
Update: it's done to help them out
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's a complete betrayal of trust to use a spouse's account without their permission.
Update: you're doing something bad with it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's a complete betrayal of trust to use a spouse's account without their permission.
Update: Your spouse doesn't mind when you use their money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's a complete betrayal of trust to use a spouse's account without their permission.
Update: Your spouse is saving for something.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's a complete betrayal of trust to use a spouse's account without their permission.
Update: you are using the account to pay a bill you share with them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's a complete betrayal of trust to use a spouse's account without their permission.
Update: they have never shared their password with you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's a complete betrayal of trust to use a spouse's account without their permission.
Update: unless they have let you do it in the past.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's a complete betrayal of trust to use a spouse's account without their permission.
Update: you don't admit to it later.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's a complete betrayal of trust to use a spouse's account without their permission.
Update: You have joint accounts
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's a complete betrayal of trust to use a spouse's account without their permission.
Update: They asked you to stay out since you've been overspending
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to do their fair share of shared work.
Update: One of them has a disability.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to do their fair share of shared work.
Update: They all have the same job title and are getting paid the same wage.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to do their fair share of shared work.
Update: They're sick and not able to come in to work or school.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to do their fair share of shared work.
Update: They have the most experience out of anyone in the group.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to do their fair share of shared work.
Update: The person is disabled.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to do their fair share of shared work.
Update: The person is strong and able bodied.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to do their fair share of shared work.
Update: they're disabled
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to do their fair share of shared work.
Update: they are fit and healthy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to do their fair share of shared work.
Update: your boss takes you off the project.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to do their fair share of shared work.
Update: the divided up workload was previously agreed upon.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should pay the debts that they own to people who have performed a service for them.
Update: They can’t afford it right now
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should pay the debts that they own to people who have performed a service for them.
Update: You do not want to accrue interest
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should pay the debts that they own to people who have performed a service for them.
Update: the service was of bad quality.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should pay the debts that they own to people who have performed a service for them.
Update: the workmanship of the service was good.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should pay the debts that they own to people who have performed a service for them.
Update: the service was performed improperly
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should pay the debts that they own to people who have performed a service for them.
Update: that person did a good job
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should pay the debts that they own to people who have performed a service for them.
Update: One is disabled and has no income.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should pay the debts that they own to people who have performed a service for them.
Update: One has a good paying job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should pay the debts that they own to people who have performed a service for them.
Update: They just don't have the money and can't do anything about it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should pay the debts that they own to people who have performed a service for them.
Update: They have extra money and want to keep good credit.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: They are trying to pick a fight and are larger than you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: You are a train conductor and people are warning you that there is a person on the tracks.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: You are finishing a task and will be done soon.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: The people are right in front of you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: they are constantly trying to annoy you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: they are trying to teach you something
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: you have told them that you do not want to be disturbed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: they are trying to tell you that your house is on fire.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: You are an umpire.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: You are a teacher.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to show concern for suicidal people.
Update: The people are getting effective help from professionals, family and friends already.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to show concern for suicidal people.
Update: The people are isolated from family and friends and are dangerous to themselves.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to show concern for suicidal people.
Update: Unless you are enabling them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to show concern for suicidal people.
Update: Especially if they don't think anyone cares.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to show concern for suicidal people.
Update: You are faking that concern.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to show concern for suicidal people.
Update: They are on a bridge.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to show concern for suicidal people.
Update: the concern will prompt them to do it again
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to show concern for suicidal people.
Update: helps them to stop the suicide attempt
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to show concern for suicidal people.
Update: They killed their family before trying to kill themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to show concern for suicidal people.
Update: You are a social worker at a college.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want things to go faster when in a hurry.
Update: You're in very fast traffic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want things to go faster when in a hurry.
Update: You're in extremely slow traffic.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want things to go faster when in a hurry.
Update: Your job requires patience
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want things to go faster when in a hurry.
Update: You are stuck in traffic and need to be at work
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want things to go faster when in a hurry.
Update: You are in a traffic jam.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want things to go faster when in a hurry.
Update: You are running late and are pressed for time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want things to go faster when in a hurry.
Update: It is completely out of your control.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want things to go faster when in a hurry.
Update: You have an important meeting to get to.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want things to go faster when in a hurry.
Update: It's important that the results are high quality.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want things to go faster when in a hurry.
Update: You have a deadline.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't abuse your ex.
Update: You're verbally abusing them in private to a trusted friend to vent and process your feelings about the relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't abuse your ex.
Update: You're physically abusing them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't abuse your ex.
Update: you are just jealous they moved on first.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't abuse your ex.
Update: Your ex is disabled.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't abuse your ex.
Update: They take care of your children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't abuse your ex.
Update: Your ex is actively harming someone in front of you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't abuse your ex.
Update: You're under the influence of alcohol.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if an animal doesn't end up fitting in with your household.
Update: You don't have a plan for it afterwards.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if an animal doesn't end up fitting in with your household.
Update: You know somebody else who will take the animal in.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if an animal doesn't end up fitting in with your household.
Update: The animal is aggressive towards children
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if an animal doesn't end up fitting in with your household.
Update: You know if you let it go it will be killed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if an animal doesn't end up fitting in with your household.
Update: it bites your children unprovoked.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if an animal doesn't end up fitting in with your household.
Update: It was a newborn puppy and you only gave it one day
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if an animal doesn't end up fitting in with your household.
Update: You have small children
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if an animal doesn't end up fitting in with your household.
Update: they will be put down if you turn them into the shelter.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if an animal doesn't end up fitting in with your household.
Update: the animal likes to bite.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be punctual when people are expecting you.
Update: it is for a party with no fixed time for people to come and go.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be punctual when people are expecting you.
Update: it is for a time sensitive event.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be punctual when people are expecting you.
Update: You're expected to be fashionably late.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be punctual when people are expecting you.
Update: You're expected at a job interview.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be punctual when people are expecting you.
Update: The other people are commonly an hour late
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be punctual when people are expecting you.
Update: You are trying to impress a client
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be punctual when people are expecting you.
Update: You informed them you might be late due to unsure work hours.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be punctual when people are expecting you.
Update: You are meeting your partners parents for the first time and want to make a good impression.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be punctual when people are expecting you.
Update: It is your execution.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be punctual when people are expecting you.
Update: It is a business meeting.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to turn people in to the IRS.
Update: It is a spouse who lied on their tax returns.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to turn people in to the IRS.
Update: You want to be friends with them.
Update type: strengthener