tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be rude when asking your partner to do something for you.
Update: You're asking them to do something unpleasant.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be rude when asking your partner to do something for you.
Update: you're angry at them for not doing it already.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be rude when asking your partner to do something for you.
Update: you want them to actually do the favor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be rude when asking your partner to do something for you.
Update: You have already asked them 5 times and they ignore you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be rude when asking your partner to do something for you.
Update: This is the first time you are requesting the favor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be rude when asking your partner to do something for you.
Update: Unless you are asking them to undo something terrible they have done.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be rude when asking your partner to do something for you.
Update: Especially if you respect them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be rude when asking your partner to do something for you.
Update: You care about your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to give gifts to people.
Update: They are lumps of coal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to give gifts to people.
Update: You want to show them how much you love them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to give gifts to people.
Update: You are giving people pets without asking.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to give gifts to people.
Update: It really helps them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to give gifts to people.
Update: They write on their party invitation that they do not want gifts.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to give gifts to people.
Update: The gifts are unexpected.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to give gifts to people.
Update: You're in deep debt.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to give gifts to people.
Update: They give you gifts too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to give gifts to people.
Update: You give them gifts that you know they won't like.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to give gifts to people.
Update: You pick each gift out for the individual people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Stealing from someone who lets you into their home to provide a service is criminal and has consequences.
Update: You steal drugs or contraband that they are not going to report to the authorities.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Stealing from someone who lets you into their home to provide a service is criminal and has consequences.
Update: It is an older blind person living on a fixed income.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Stealing from someone who lets you into their home to provide a service is criminal and has consequences.
Update: you take high dollar items.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Stealing from someone who lets you into their home to provide a service is criminal and has consequences.
Update: You do it more than once.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Stealing from someone who lets you into their home to provide a service is criminal and has consequences.
Update: You can get away with it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Stealing from someone who lets you into their home to provide a service is criminal and has consequences.
Update: You use weapons
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Stealing from someone who lets you into their home to provide a service is criminal and has consequences.
Update: it was important to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't walk out on your family.
Update: they were being rude to you first
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't walk out on your family.
Update: you were at an important wedding event
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't walk out on your family.
Update: They are abusive to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't walk out on your family.
Update: You have children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't walk out on your family.
Update: They disowned you for being homosexual.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't walk out on your family.
Update: They are suffering from a traumatic experience.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't walk out on your family.
Update: Your family is abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't walk out on your family.
Update: Your family needs you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't walk out on your family.
Update: They don't respect your sexuality
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't walk out on your family.
Update: They are setting up an intervention for you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to want to be civil after a breakup.
Update: You were traumatizing by your time with your ex and panic whenever you're near them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to want to be civil after a breakup.
Update: You pride yourself on your ability to control your emotions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to want to be civil after a breakup.
Update: There is long-simmering bitterness that will take time to heal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to want to be civil after a breakup.
Update: You both want to go your own ways without negative baggage.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to want to be civil after a breakup.
Update: they cheated on you with your best friend
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to want to be civil after a breakup.
Update: you can still be best friends after the relationship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to want to be civil after a breakup.
Update: You were abused.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to want to be civil after a breakup.
Update: He acted fairly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to want to be civil after a breakup.
Update: your ex is stalking you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to want to be civil after a breakup.
Update: you want to stay in touch with their family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to keep low wages.
Update: Unless profits are also low.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to keep low wages.
Update: Especially if profits are high.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to keep low wages.
Update: the company can't afford better wages
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to keep low wages.
Update: the company makes large earnings
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to keep low wages.
Update: you don't have any other choice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to keep low wages.
Update: you got an offer for higher wages.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to keep low wages.
Update: You pay people big bonuses instead of hourly wages.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to keep low wages.
Update: You can afford to pay more.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to keep low wages.
Update: It equals the federal minimum wage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to keep low wages.
Update: It is not a living wage.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want your significant other to change their appearance.
Update: Your significant other is a model
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want your significant other to change their appearance.
Update: it's for the better
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want your significant other to change their appearance.
Update: it's for the worse
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want your significant other to change their appearance.
Update: it is best to do so for their health.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want your significant other to change their appearance.
Update: you really like the way they look.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want your significant other to change their appearance.
Update: they need a confidence boost.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want your significant other to change their appearance.
Update: it requires surgery.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want your significant other to change their appearance.
Update: This is something they want
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want your significant other to change their appearance.
Update: You love them for who they are
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to avoid your friend if they have been disrespectful towards you.
Update: You have to work with them on a daily basis.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to avoid your friend if they have been disrespectful towards you.
Update: You are waiting for them to apologize.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to avoid your friend if they have been disrespectful towards you.
Update: You have a group project to do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to avoid your friend if they have been disrespectful towards you.
Update: This is a pattern of disrespect.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to avoid your friend if they have been disrespectful towards you.
Update: They are very sorry
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to avoid your friend if they have been disrespectful towards you.
Update: They called your partner rude names
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to avoid your friend if they have been disrespectful towards you.
Update: You're working on a project with your friend for school.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to avoid your friend if they have been disrespectful towards you.
Update: You're on summer vacation from school.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to avoid your friend if they have been disrespectful towards you.
Update: They didn't realize what they did.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to avoid your friend if they have been disrespectful towards you.
Update: They aren't remorseful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to take responsibility for your actions.
Update: Someone put a gun to your head and forced you to do them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to take responsibility for your actions.
Update: People were hurt as a result of your actions and you could help them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to take responsibility for your actions.
Update: you were incapacitated at the time of the actions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to take responsibility for your actions.
Update: you knew exactly what you did wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to take responsibility for your actions.
Update: someone literally forced you to act at gunpoint.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to take responsibility for your actions.
Update: your actions caused harm.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to take responsibility for your actions.
Update: You were tricked into taking those actions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to take responsibility for your actions.
Update: Your actions caused problems for others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to take responsibility for your actions.
Update: You want to give the credit to a co-worker
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to take responsibility for your actions.
Update: Someone else is getting blamed for it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to take up for a partner who is being attacked.
Update: You would put your life in jeopardy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to take up for a partner who is being attacked.
Update: You know you could save your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to take up for a partner who is being attacked.
Update: Your partner is actually in the wrong
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to take up for a partner who is being attacked.
Update: Your partner didn’t say anything wrong
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to take up for a partner who is being attacked.
Update: They instigated the fight.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to take up for a partner who is being attacked.
Update: They are being attacked because of their looks.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to take up for a partner who is being attacked.
Update: they are playing football.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to take up for a partner who is being attacked.
Update: they're being bit by dogs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to avoid loved ones without an explanation, even if you are anxious.
Update: They treat you poorly
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to avoid loved ones without an explanation, even if you are anxious.
Update: They love you and want to see you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to avoid loved ones without an explanation, even if you are anxious.
Update: they will annoy you without one.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to avoid loved ones without an explanation, even if you are anxious.
Update: they will worry about your safety.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to avoid loved ones without an explanation, even if you are anxious.
Update: You are afraid you have a terrible communicable disease.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to avoid loved ones without an explanation, even if you are anxious.
Update: They have insecurities and wild imaginations.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to avoid loved ones without an explanation, even if you are anxious.
Update: They have been abusive to you in the past.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to avoid loved ones without an explanation, even if you are anxious.
Update: They are worried about you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to avoid loved ones without an explanation, even if you are anxious.
Update: You do not want to bother them with your stress.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to avoid loved ones without an explanation, even if you are anxious.
Update: They are willing to always help you out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't turn off something if nobody wants you to do it.
Update: they don't realize it's overheating.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't turn off something if nobody wants you to do it.
Update: you're doing it to be rude.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't turn off something if nobody wants you to do it.
Update: You pay for the electricity
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't turn off something if nobody wants you to do it.
Update: Someone is playing a game
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't turn off something if nobody wants you to do it.
Update: it is smoking
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't turn off something if nobody wants you to do it.
Update: you don't want to be yelled at
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't turn off something if nobody wants you to do it.
Update: It poses an immediate hazard.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't turn off something if nobody wants you to do it.
Update: Someone is currently using it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't turn off something if nobody wants you to do it.
Update: the appliance is wasting electricity needlessly
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't turn off something if nobody wants you to do it.
Update: it is the lights in a room
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want some time by yourself every now and then.
Update: You never see anyone at all
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want some time by yourself every now and then.
Update: You just had a long day at work
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want some time by yourself every now and then.
Update: you are avoiding social commitments.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want some time by yourself every now and then.
Update: you have a social oriented job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want some time by yourself every now and then.
Update: You shun everyone out of your life or take time away when someone needs you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want some time by yourself every now and then.
Update: You need alone time to recharge your batteries or meditate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want some time by yourself every now and then.
Update: you are neglecting your obligations
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want some time by yourself every now and then.
Update: you are an introvert
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want some time by yourself every now and then.
Update: You have kids.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want some time by yourself every now and then.
Update: You are an introvert.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is a good way for a couple to save money if they can use one vehicle to get to work.
Update: They drive a Hummer an hour each way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is a good way for a couple to save money if they can use one vehicle to get to work.
Update: They have trouble saving money in other areas of their lives.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is a good way for a couple to save money if they can use one vehicle to get to work.
Update: They work in different states.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is a good way for a couple to save money if they can use one vehicle to get to work.
Update: They work in the same office.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is a good way for a couple to save money if they can use one vehicle to get to work.
Update: They work on opposite ends of the city
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is a good way for a couple to save money if they can use one vehicle to get to work.
Update: They both work in the same area
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is a good way for a couple to save money if they can use one vehicle to get to work.
Update: they work in opposite directions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is a good way for a couple to save money if they can use one vehicle to get to work.
Update: their jobs are close to each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is a good way for a couple to save money if they can use one vehicle to get to work.
Update: Their work shifts overlap and it's not possible.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is a good way for a couple to save money if they can use one vehicle to get to work.
Update: They work the same shift at or near the same facility.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always be there to support your partner.
Update: your partner is physically abusive
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always be there to support your partner.
Update: your partner is sick in bed
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always be there to support your partner.
Update: Your partner isn't supported by anyone else.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always be there to support your partner.
Update: Your partner gets nervous when you watch them give a speech.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always be there to support your partner.
Update: You know that they would support you if the situation was reverse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always be there to support your partner.
Update: you find out that your partner has been cheating on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always be there to support your partner.
Update: your partner has always been patient, caring, and supportive with you encouraging your personal growth and development.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always be there to support your partner.
Update: They are doing a fashion shoot in a distant land.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always be there to support your partner.
Update: They are having problems with their eyesight.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Leaving a situation unresolved can lead to more conflict.
Update: You will never see the other person again in the situation despite its lack of resolution.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Leaving a situation unresolved can lead to more conflict.
Update: You will still be around the people involved in the situation in some way and have to interact with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Leaving a situation unresolved can lead to more conflict.
Update: the people involved are in close quarters.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Leaving a situation unresolved can lead to more conflict.
Update: Both parties have agreed to let the subject drop.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Leaving a situation unresolved can lead to more conflict.
Update: You know you'll obsess over the issue until it is resolved.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Leaving a situation unresolved can lead to more conflict.
Update: You physically leave the area where the other person lives.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Leaving a situation unresolved can lead to more conflict.
Update: Both people leave the situation angry.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Leaving a situation unresolved can lead to more conflict.
Update: you know you can't fix it now.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Leaving a situation unresolved can lead to more conflict.
Update: it is something easy to handle.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not your responsibility to return property that was left by others.
Update: you know who it belongs to and where that person is.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not your responsibility to return property that was left by others.
Update: people leave their property in strange places all the time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not your responsibility to return property that was left by others.
Update: they are a neighbor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not your responsibility to return property that was left by others.
Update: they have moved across the country.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not your responsibility to return property that was left by others.
Update: You have it in your possession.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not your responsibility to return property that was left by others.
Update: You would have to go out of your way to return it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not your responsibility to return property that was left by others.
Update: they are you friend.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not your responsibility to return property that was left by others.
Update: you bought the property.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not your responsibility to return property that was left by others.
Update: They left it by accident.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not your responsibility to return property that was left by others.
Update: They left it on purpose due to laziness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try it interactions you have with people you do not care for.
Update: They are Nazis.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try it interactions you have with people you do not care for.
Update: You need something from them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should try it interactions you have with people you do not care for.
Update: You know that the two of you can't be civil to each other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should try it interactions you have with people you do not care for.
Update: You're trying to become more patient.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Coworkers are expected to help each other.
Update: they are competing for a new raise.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Coworkers are expected to help each other.
Update: they are doing a group project.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Coworkers are expected to help each other.
Update: Everyone is really busy or on vacation.
Update type: weakener