tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to spend time with your friend's parents.
Update: You are on a camping trip and staying in the same tent as them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to spend time with your friend's parents.
Update: You have nothing in common to talk to them about.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to spend time with your friend's parents.
Update: You are their care taker.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to spend time with your friend's parents.
Update: They are mean to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to spend time with your friend's parents.
Update: They came to your house for dinner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to spend time with your friend's parents.
Update: They are rude.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You can invite who ever you want to your party.
Update: We hit the building occupation limit.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You can invite who ever you want to your party.
Update: You only want to invite a few people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You can invite who ever you want to your party.
Update: You have to follow maximum capacity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You can invite who ever you want to your party.
Update: You are paying for the party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You can invite who ever you want to your party.
Update: The party is a $1,000-a-plate fundraiser.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You can invite who ever you want to your party.
Update: It is a potluck dinner party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You can invite who ever you want to your party.
Update: You are having your party in a bar and want to invite someone underage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You can invite who ever you want to your party.
Update: You are having your party at your house and paying for everything yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You can invite who ever you want to your party.
Update: The party is being funded by your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You can invite who ever you want to your party.
Update: The party is something you've saved up for a long time to afford.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to get out and move from under someones home and rules and not have a scene made
Update: you do not have any money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to get out and move from under someones home and rules and not have a scene made
Update: you have the money to do so.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to get out and move from under someones home and rules and not have a scene made
Update: You want people to know how bad that person is.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to get out and move from under someones home and rules and not have a scene made
Update: You have the money and resources to move out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to get out and move from under someones home and rules and not have a scene made
Update: The scene will result in a cry for help with further understanding of the problem.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to get out and move from under someones home and rules and not have a scene made
Update: Plans have been made accordingly ahead of time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to get out and move from under someones home and rules and not have a scene made
Update: You cannot afford your own place.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to get out and move from under someones home and rules and not have a scene made
Update: You are an adult.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to get out and move from under someones home and rules and not have a scene made
Update: they other person is stealing from you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to get out and move from under someones home and rules and not have a scene made
Update: you told them you would only stay for a short period of time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be mad at a significant other for something they did that harmed you.
Update: They put your safety at risk
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be mad at a significant other for something they did that harmed you.
Update: They did it because you hurt them first
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be mad at a significant other for something they did that harmed you.
Update: What they did made you not trust them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be mad at a significant other for something they did that harmed you.
Update: They have harmed you before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be mad at a significant other for something they did that harmed you.
Update: They have gotten back at you for harming them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be mad at a significant other for something they did that harmed you.
Update: You have always been nice to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be mad at a significant other for something they did that harmed you.
Update: They did it accidentally and apologized.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be mad at a significant other for something they did that harmed you.
Update: They knew what they were doing and did it anyway.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you don't like something they did.
Update: They didn't know that the thing they did was something you weren't going to like.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you don't like something they did.
Update: If they did the thing you don't like over and over again, even after they know you don't like it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you don't like something they did.
Update: They prevented you from drinking and driving.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you don't like something they did.
Update: They just finished robbing a bank.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you don't like something they did.
Update: They racked up debt on your credit card
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you don't like something they did.
Update: You are being petty.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you don't like something they did.
Update: They cheated on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you don't like something they did.
Update: You're married to the person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you don't like something they did.
Update: The relationship hasn't been going on that long.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to get tired of guests after a while.
Update: You are paid to take care of them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to get tired of guests after a while.
Update: They are being too demanding.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to get tired of guests after a while.
Update: You are a hotel owner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to get tired of guests after a while.
Update: They expect you to wait on them all the time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to get tired of guests after a while.
Update: they just came over.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to get tired of guests after a while.
Update: they have been there for a while.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to get tired of guests after a while.
Update: You own a hotel.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to get tired of guests after a while.
Update: They have overstayed their welcome.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to get tired of guests after a while.
Update: The 4 feet of snow is the reason they can't leave your house.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to get tired of guests after a while.
Update: They are 14 days in to what was supposed to be a 5 day visit
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have moral opinions about people who behave in a lascivious manner.
Update: You are secretly behaving in the same manner
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have moral opinions about people who behave in a lascivious manner.
Update: You’re a very religious person
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have moral opinions about people who behave in a lascivious manner.
Update: You force those views on others
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have moral opinions about people who behave in a lascivious manner.
Update: You are also indulging the same behavior.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have moral opinions about people who behave in a lascivious manner.
Update: They are your children and you raised them better than that.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have moral opinions about people who behave in a lascivious manner.
Update: You're a swinger or a sexual deviant and do pretty much the same things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have moral opinions about people who behave in a lascivious manner.
Update: They're doing it a public setting.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have moral opinions about people who behave in a lascivious manner.
Update: You are acting impartially in a court of law.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have moral opinions about people who behave in a lascivious manner.
Update: That lascivious behavior is harming someone directly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should understand if your significant other you are cheating on tells the person you are cheating on them with.
Update: You hid your affair's phone number from your partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should understand if your significant other you are cheating on tells the person you are cheating on them with.
Update: Your partner caught you cheating.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should understand if your significant other you are cheating on tells the person you are cheating on them with.
Update: They are cheating on you with the same person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should understand if your significant other you are cheating on tells the person you are cheating on them with.
Update: You value truth in a relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should understand if your significant other you are cheating on tells the person you are cheating on them with.
Update: They promised they would not say anything.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should understand if your significant other you are cheating on tells the person you are cheating on them with.
Update: You treated them badly too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should understand if your significant other you are cheating on tells the person you are cheating on them with.
Update: The person you're cheating with is giving you money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should understand if your significant other you are cheating on tells the person you are cheating on them with.
Update: Your significant other promised to stay out of your other relationships in the past.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should understand if your significant other you are cheating on tells the person you are cheating on them with.
Update: Your significant other is a close friend of the person you are cheating with.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to kick someone out of a wedding.
Update: They are drunk or uninvited.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to kick someone out of a wedding.
Update: They are one of the people getting married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to kick someone out of a wedding.
Update: They are being disrespectful to the bride and groom.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to kick someone out of a wedding.
Update: The bride is the one that is being kicked out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to kick someone out of a wedding.
Update: They are being obnoxious and drunk.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to kick someone out of a wedding.
Update: They are the bride or groom.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to kick someone out of a wedding.
Update: They are spoiling it for everyone by acting rowdy and crazy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to kick someone out of a wedding.
Update: They are acting pleasant and congenial and are not hurting anyone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to kick someone out of a wedding.
Update: They are drunk and unruly
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to kick someone out of a wedding.
Update: It is the brides mom
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to keep things clean.
Update: it is already clean
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to keep things clean.
Update: you are allergic to dust.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to keep things clean.
Update: You are trying to look homeless to improve your panhandling sucess
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to keep things clean.
Update: You are working in a hospital
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to keep things clean.
Update: You become obsessive about it and spend eight hours a day cleaning.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to keep things clean.
Update: Being in a clean environment makes you feel more hopeful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to keep things clean.
Update: you are recovering from being sick.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to keep things clean.
Update: you are scared of germs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to keep things clean.
Update: You work in a hospital
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your property respected by friends.
Update: You love the look of graffiti.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your property respected by friends.
Update: They are also your neighbors.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your property respected by friends.
Update: You are burning items from an ex.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your property respected by friends.
Update: It's your car.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your property respected by friends.
Update: They pay your rent for you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your property respected by friends.
Update: You take your shoes off when you go to their house.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your property respected by friends.
Update: They're trying to save you in a burning house.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your property respected by friends.
Update: You've always respected their belongings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your property respected by friends.
Update: You are bad about disrespecting other people's property.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your property respected by friends.
Update: If you have asked them repeatedly to be careful with your belongings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not complain about your family members.
Update: they did something mean.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not complain about your family members.
Update: they did nothing to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not complain about your family members.
Update: You are with your therapist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not complain about your family members.
Update: Your family members keep you grounded.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not complain about your family members.
Update: They have never been caring to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not complain about your family members.
Update: They are always loving and supportive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not complain about your family members.
Update: They have purposely hurt you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not complain about your family members.
Update: They have been nothing but nice to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not complain about your family members.
Update: You need help dealing with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not complain about your family members.
Update: You're being unreasonable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be sad when you find out your partner is cheating.
Update: You have been cheating as well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be sad when you find out your partner is cheating.
Update: You have been faithful to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be sad when you find out your partner is cheating.
Update: This is not the first time
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be sad when you find out your partner is cheating.
Update: You cheated first and this is retaliation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be sad when you find out your partner is cheating.
Update: You have been together a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be sad when you find out your partner is cheating.
Update: You were also cheating.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be sad when you find out your partner is cheating.
Update: You cheated on them first
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be sad when you find out your partner is cheating.
Update: You loved them very much
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ask your friend personal questions if you are really close.
Update: they are trying to keep it private.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ask your friend personal questions if you are really close.
Update: you have shared personal stories of your own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ask your friend personal questions if you are really close.
Update: Your friend doesn't trust you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ask your friend personal questions if you are really close.
Update: You've known the friend for decades.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ask your friend personal questions if you are really close.
Update: you know they are offended by such questions
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ask your friend personal questions if you are really close.
Update: you want to help them with their problems
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ask your friend personal questions if you are really close.
Update: Your friend likes keeping secrets
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ask your friend personal questions if you are really close.
Update: You have told your friend everything about yourself
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ask your friend personal questions if you are really close.
Update: They have made it clear the subject is off limits.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ask your friend personal questions if you are really close.
Update: They need someone to talk to about the things they are going through.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Friendly competition between friends can be exciting.
Update: Your friends get mad when they compete
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Friendly competition between friends can be exciting.
Update: Your friends love competing against each other
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Friendly competition between friends can be exciting.
Update: One friend doesn't want to compete.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Friendly competition between friends can be exciting.
Update: Both friends have been looking forward to competing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Friendly competition between friends can be exciting.
Update: You are a sore loser and know that the boggle tournament will end with you in a bad mood.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Friendly competition between friends can be exciting.
Update: You are all competitive friends and it is dodgeball day!
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Friendly competition between friends can be exciting.
Update: Unless you are obsessively competitive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Friendly competition between friends can be exciting.
Update: Especially if you support each others successes.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Friendly competition between friends can be exciting.
Update: You love video games
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to go back on your word.
Update: You are very ill.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to go back on your word.
Update: You gave your word to a friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to go back on your word.
Update: You realized that you were wrong.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to go back on your word.
Update: You're only doing it to gain popularity.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to go back on your word.
Update: You realize you made the wrong decision in the first place.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to go back on your word.
Update: You're impacting the lives of others directly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to go back on your word.
Update: Circumstances beyond your control have come up that prevent you from keeping your word.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to go back on your word.
Update: There's no reason you can't keep your word.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to go back on your word.
Update: The other person doesn’t respect your wishes
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to go back on your word.
Update: You signed a contract
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is better to ignore someone if you don't want to talk to them instead of being disrespectful to them.
Update: You need to stand up for your rights
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is better to ignore someone if you don't want to talk to them instead of being disrespectful to them.
Update: You are trying to minimize conflict
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is better to ignore someone if you don't want to talk to them instead of being disrespectful to them.
Update: They asked you specifically if you don’t want to talk to them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is better to ignore someone if you don't want to talk to them instead of being disrespectful to them.
Update: They are always rude to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is better to ignore someone if you don't want to talk to them instead of being disrespectful to them.
Update: The person is aggressively pursuing you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is better to ignore someone if you don't want to talk to them instead of being disrespectful to them.
Update: The person seems like they might become violent if angered.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is better to ignore someone if you don't want to talk to them instead of being disrespectful to them.
Update: You are the bearer of news that impacts them personally.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is better to ignore someone if you don't want to talk to them instead of being disrespectful to them.
Update: You never got along with that person in the first place.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is better to ignore someone if you don't want to talk to them instead of being disrespectful to them.
Update: You have to talk to them because you are co-workers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is better to ignore someone if you don't want to talk to them instead of being disrespectful to them.
Update: You can't control your temper when talking to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You have the right to handle your household however you'd like.
Update: You are a teenager.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You have the right to handle your household however you'd like.
Update: You are an adult and pay the bills.
Update type: strengthener