tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to end a close friendship if you have good reason.
Update: your reason is actually selfish.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to end a close friendship if you have good reason.
Update: someone betrayed your trust.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to end a close friendship if you have good reason.
Update: You don't want to set healthy boundaries in your life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to end a close friendship if you have good reason.
Update: You are trying to set healthy boundaries in your life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to end a close friendship if you have good reason.
Update: Your friend is showing signs of mental illness.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to end a close friendship if you have good reason.
Update: They are a drug addict.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to end a close friendship if you have good reason.
Update: the other friend really wants a friendship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to end a close friendship if you have good reason.
Update: the friend agrees with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to end a close friendship if you have good reason.
Update: You have not even tried to work things out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to end a close friendship if you have good reason.
Update: The other person has become abusive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not listen to your friends.
Update: You are deaf.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not listen to your friends.
Update: Your friends are going through a break-up.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not listen to your friends.
Update: Your friends hang out with bad people
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not listen to your friends.
Update: They want the best for you in life
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not listen to your friends.
Update: Your friends are giving you bad advice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not listen to your friends.
Update: You friends have been in the same situation and know what you should do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not listen to your friends.
Update: Your friends are pressuring you into doing drugs
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not listen to your friends.
Update: They are warning you away from someone toxic
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not listen to your friends.
Update: They're giving you bad advice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not listen to your friends.
Update: They're trying to help you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should never share another's health results without prior permission.
Update: You are a patient sharing your information with your family.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should never share another's health results without prior permission.
Update: You are a doctor and a patient's family is asking.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should never share another's health results without prior permission.
Update: That person is highly contagious.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should never share another's health results without prior permission.
Update: The person is suffering from an embarrassing disease.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should never share another's health results without prior permission.
Update: You are the patient's doctor seeking advice from peers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should never share another's health results without prior permission.
Update: The hospital is bound to laws preventing that very thing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should never share another's health results without prior permission.
Update: The results could cause a stigma for the person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should never share another's health results without prior permission.
Update: One is authorized to share the results without permission.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should never share another's health results without prior permission.
Update: The results are very sensitive and private to another person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not check your messages if you do not want to.
Update: You work for a very large and profitable corporation and have many clients.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not check your messages if you do not want to.
Update: You are on a relaxing vacation on an island.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not check your messages if you do not want to.
Update: You are expecting an important message that you need to respond to quickly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not check your messages if you do not want to.
Update: You are very tired and need some time to decompress.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not check your messages if you do not want to.
Update: You're waiting for an important message.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not check your messages if you do not want to.
Update: You've been spending too much time looking at screens.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not check your messages if you do not want to.
Update: You are expecting an important message.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not check your messages if you do not want to.
Update: You are on a date.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not check your messages if you do not want to.
Update: Your messages are from your boss.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not check your messages if you do not want to.
Update: You are on vacation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to control your personal property.
Update: You own other human beings.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to control your personal property.
Update: You bought your property yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to control your personal property.
Update: You are a child and your parent asked you to put your items away.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to control your personal property.
Update: You own a house and want to paint it a different color.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to control your personal property.
Update: You are actively harming another person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to control your personal property.
Update: You are defending yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to control your personal property.
Update: You are selfish and do not share with others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to control your personal property.
Update: There is a thief who may steal your things.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to control your personal property.
Update: You are under the influence of alcohol and it could be dangerous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to control your personal property.
Update: You just recently retired and worked hard for many years.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: They are being racist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: They are depressed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: They have done something illegal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: They are going through a rough time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: Your partner is abusive towards you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: Your partner is having trouble with job and home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: They want to break up with you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: They're going through a difficult time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: Your partner has committed a serious crime.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your partner.
Update: You are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ask your ex for their family member's phone number.
Update: You need to know if your ex really cheated on you or not
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ask your ex for their family member's phone number.
Update: No one in your ex’s family likes you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ask your ex for their family member's phone number.
Update: you need to return something to their family.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ask your ex for their family member's phone number.
Update: your ex's family is angry with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ask your ex for their family member's phone number.
Update: There is noone else to ask and it's regarding an important issue.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ask your ex for their family member's phone number.
Update: You can get the information from someone else.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ask your ex for their family member's phone number.
Update: It is an emergency involving lives.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ask your ex for their family member's phone number.
Update: You are currently in prison.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ask your ex for their family member's phone number.
Update: You are still friends with your ex.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ask your ex for their family member's phone number.
Update: Your other half has asked you not to speak to your ex.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to order your significant other to do something.
Update: Your significant other enjoys taking orders.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to order your significant other to do something.
Update: Your significant other has asked you to be more kind.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to order your significant other to do something.
Update: You are verbally abusive to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to order your significant other to do something.
Update: They will not take out the garbage until you do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to order your significant other to do something.
Update: They are sensitive about being bossed around.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to order your significant other to do something.
Update: You are in dire need of help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to order your significant other to do something.
Update: You have a loving, mutual relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to order your significant other to do something.
Update: You are cooking in a kitchen and you are teaching them how to cook
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to order your significant other to do something.
Update: You raise your voice when you do it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't lend your house to others while you're not there.
Update: You can trust them to care for the dog.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't lend your house to others while you're not there.
Update: They have a history of theft.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't lend your house to others while you're not there.
Update: Your family is house sitting for you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't lend your house to others while you're not there.
Update: You have many valuables at home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't lend your house to others while you're not there.
Update: you are running a bed and breakfast for money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't lend your house to others while you're not there.
Update: you have easily upset pets in the home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't lend your house to others while you're not there.
Update: Your family members need someplace to stay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't lend your house to others while you're not there.
Update: You don't know the people who would be staying there.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't lend your house to others while you're not there.
Update: You are using it for AirBnB
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't lend your house to others while you're not there.
Update: Someone previously stole items that stayed there
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be aware that a lot of pointless talking can be irritating to some people.
Update: You are performing in a comedy club.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be aware that a lot of pointless talking can be irritating to some people.
Update: You think your anecdotes are funny.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be aware that a lot of pointless talking can be irritating to some people.
Update: you're teaching.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be aware that a lot of pointless talking can be irritating to some people.
Update: the people need to go somewhere.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be aware that a lot of pointless talking can be irritating to some people.
Update: They need a distraction to help them calm down.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be aware that a lot of pointless talking can be irritating to some people.
Update: You are talking about really depressing things.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be aware that a lot of pointless talking can be irritating to some people.
Update: They also do alot of pointless talking so they might not find it irritating
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be aware that a lot of pointless talking can be irritating to some people.
Update: They are visibly annoyed
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be aware that a lot of pointless talking can be irritating to some people.
Update: There is an uncomfortable silence that needs to be filled.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be aware that a lot of pointless talking can be irritating to some people.
Update: You are running late to catch a flight.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to not want to have your brother and his family move in to your home.
Update: You know they will be homeless during a dangerously cold period.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to not want to have your brother and his family move in to your home.
Update: You know your brother steals.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to not want to have your brother and his family move in to your home.
Update: They will have no where else to live without your help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to not want to have your brother and his family move in to your home.
Update: They repeatedly get evicted because of fighting and violence
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to not want to have your brother and his family move in to your home.
Update: You offered for your brother to stay in your home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to not want to have your brother and his family move in to your home.
Update: They showed up unannounced.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to not want to have your brother and his family move in to your home.
Update: They have nowhere else to go.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to not want to have your brother and his family move in to your home.
Update: You do not have room in your home for the whole family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to not want to have your brother and his family move in to your home.
Update: There house burned down and they have nowhere else to go.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to not want to have your brother and his family move in to your home.
Update: You  know that he does not have a job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your future brother in law from things.
Update: Your fiance absolutely hates him.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your future brother in law from things.
Update: Your fiance is extremely close to him.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your future brother in law from things.
Update: He stood up and objected your marriage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your future brother in law from things.
Update: Your future sister in law is included.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your future brother in law from things.
Update: He is a racist jerk.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your future brother in law from things.
Update: He is a great guy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your future brother in law from things.
Update: you both do not get along
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your future brother in law from things.
Update: he wants to be friends with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your future brother in law from things.
Update: They are always stuck up and obnoxious
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your future brother in law from things.
Update: You have been friends with this person for years
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to leave a business because they are treating a homeless person with kindness.
Update: You know that the homeless person has done horrible things to other people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to leave a business because they are treating a homeless person with kindness.
Update: The homeless person is known to be good and needs the kindness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to leave a business because they are treating a homeless person with kindness.
Update: Your business is already done and you're on your way out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to leave a business because they are treating a homeless person with kindness.
Update: You have accepted help from others at any point in your life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to leave a business because they are treating a homeless person with kindness.
Update: You've already bought what you came there for.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to leave a business because they are treating a homeless person with kindness.
Update: You spit on the homeless person on the way out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to leave a business because they are treating a homeless person with kindness.
Update: The homeless person just uses them for money for drugs
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to leave a business because they are treating a homeless person with kindness.
Update: The homeless person isn’t bothering anyone or you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to leave a business because they are treating a homeless person with kindness.
Update: You finished with your business there and ready to leave anyway.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to leave a business because they are treating a homeless person with kindness.
Update: They are a Church.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to bring up injustice when needed.
Update: You're not well educated in injustice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to bring up injustice when needed.
Update: You've got a degree in social justice.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to bring up injustice when needed.
Update: You are trying to promote the injustice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to bring up injustice when needed.
Update: You're trying to rectify the injustice.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to bring up injustice when needed.
Update: You are being held hostage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to bring up injustice when needed.
Update: You are able to help with critical information.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to bring up injustice when needed.
Update: You are standing up to a crowd all alone and fear retaliation
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to bring up injustice when needed.
Update: You know you are doing the right thing by disagreeing with the bigot at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to bring up injustice when needed.
Update: It involves getting back at criminals.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to bring up injustice when needed.
Update: Offends someone in a sexual or racist manner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't care about your partner's sister's virginity.
Update: You took their virginity before dating their sister.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't care about your partner's sister's virginity.
Update: Her sister is still a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't care about your partner's sister's virginity.
Update: You have boundaries
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with your partner if they are mean to you.
Update: You were mean first and they were retaliating.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with your partner if they are mean to you.
Update: They were mean without provocation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with your partner if they are mean to you.
Update: You were the first one to be mean.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with your partner if they are mean to you.
Update: They do it all the time and are never respectful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with your partner if they are mean to you.
Update: you did something for them to be mean to you about.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with your partner if they are mean to you.
Update: they are just in a bad mood and being mean for no reason.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with your partner if they are mean to you.
Update: You have directly caused them to be mean to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with your partner if they are mean to you.
Update: You have done nothing wrong and are being nice to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with your partner if they are mean to you.
Update: Your partner belittles you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is selfish to expect a thank you when sending a condolence card to someone mourning a loss.
Update: The dead individual is a child
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is selfish to expect a thank you when sending a condolence card to someone mourning a loss.
Update: They lost both parents at the same time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is selfish to expect a thank you when sending a condolence card to someone mourning a loss.
Update: They lost their spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is selfish to expect a thank you when sending a condolence card to someone mourning a loss.
Update: You also included a heart-felt letter and photographs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is selfish to expect a thank you when sending a condolence card to someone mourning a loss.
Update: The bereaved person is an acquaintance.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be appreciative towards the things that are given to you.
Update: They're things you'll never use.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be appreciative towards the things that are given to you.
Update: They're useful to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be appreciative towards the things that are given to you.
Update: You only get given things you don't want
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be appreciative towards the things that are given to you.
Update: You have no income
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be appreciative towards the things that are given to you.
Update: they are second hand gifts or used.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be appreciative towards the things that are given to you.
Update: you do not have a lot of money.
Update type: strengthener