tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: You are expected to tip for good service.
Update: you can't afford to do so
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to tip for good service.
Update: you run a large tab
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is OK to not want to help clean up someone elses messy car.
Update: you're responsible for making it messy
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is OK to not want to help clean up someone elses messy car.
Update: they are having it done by professionals
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is OK to not want to help clean up someone elses messy car.
Update: you run a detail shop.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is OK to not want to help clean up someone elses messy car.
Update: there is rotting food in the car.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is OK to not want to help clean up someone elses messy car.
Update: You spilled your lunch in their car.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is OK to not want to help clean up someone elses messy car.
Update: The car was messy when they picked you up.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is OK to not want to help clean up someone elses messy car.
Update: You were the one who messed it up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is OK to not want to help clean up someone elses messy car.
Update: They always refuse to give you rides.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is OK to not want to help clean up someone elses messy car.
Update: You are the one who messed up their car.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is OK to not want to help clean up someone elses messy car.
Update: It is a complete strangers car.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to be rude to people including an ex.
Update: Your ex had cheated on you in the past.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to be rude to people including an ex.
Update: You and your partner ended on good terms.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to be rude to people including an ex.
Update: Your ex stalks and insults you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to be rude to people including an ex.
Update: You and your ex ended things on good terms.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to be rude to people including an ex.
Update: Unless your ex has been horrible to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to be rude to people including an ex.
Update: Especially if your ex is trying to be fair.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to be rude to people including an ex.
Update: They were rude first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to be rude to people including an ex.
Update: You have kids with the ex.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to be rude to people including an ex.
Update: Your ex abused you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to be rude to people including an ex.
Update: You have children with your ex.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: There are sometimes other issues causing health concerns.
Update: You are having liver issues due to drinking.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: There are sometimes other issues causing health concerns.
Update: You live a healthy lifestyle.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: There are sometimes other issues causing health concerns.
Update: you have been given a specific diagnosis by a doctor
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: There are sometimes other issues causing health concerns.
Update: you live an unhealthy lifestyle
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: There are sometimes other issues causing health concerns.
Update: You have Munchhausen's.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: There are sometimes other issues causing health concerns.
Update: You are very old.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: There are sometimes other issues causing health concerns.
Update: You are a heavy smoker
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: There are sometimes other issues causing health concerns.
Update: You are totally healthy and work out and eat healthy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: There are sometimes other issues causing health concerns.
Update: You have gotten a second opinion which confirms the first opinion.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: There are sometimes other issues causing health concerns.
Update: You are sensitive to environmental and weather-related changes.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is normal to address the dean first.
Update: The dean left you off the honor roll
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is normal to address the dean first.
Update: You know the dean personally
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is normal to address the dean first.
Update: His wife is present.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is normal to address the dean first.
Update: You and he are only surrounded by other students.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is normal to address the dean first.
Update: You are expecting bad news.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is normal to address the dean first.
Update: You are expecting good news.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is normal to address the dean first.
Update: you weren't introduced to them first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is normal to address the dean first.
Update: they are the only other one in the room.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is normal to address the dean first.
Update: You are unhappy with a grade from your professor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is normal to address the dean first.
Update: Your professor has been verbally abusive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay for a grandparent to see older grand kids still as youths.
Update: The grandkids are in their forties.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay for a grandparent to see older grand kids still as youths.
Update: The grandkids just turned 18.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay for a grandparent to see older grand kids still as youths.
Update: They are adults with kids.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay for a grandparent to see older grand kids still as youths.
Update: They want to continue viewing them as their babies.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay for a grandparent to see older grand kids still as youths.
Update: It becomes disrespectful.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay for a grandparent to see older grand kids still as youths.
Update: The kids don't mind.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay for a grandparent to see older grand kids still as youths.
Update: They are losing their minds and really think they are youths.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay for a grandparent to see older grand kids still as youths.
Update: They have been around them regularly since they were born.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay for a grandparent to see older grand kids still as youths.
Update: it offends grown grandchildren.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay for a grandparent to see older grand kids still as youths.
Update: they want to!
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not allow someone to move in with you.
Update: They are in need a home for a short time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not allow someone to move in with you.
Update: That person is a violent person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not allow someone to move in with you.
Update: It's your own minor child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not allow someone to move in with you.
Update: You don't have room for them to move in.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not allow someone to move in with you.
Update: Your own child has lost their job and needs a place to temporarily stay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not allow someone to move in with you.
Update: They don't have the money to pay rent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not allow someone to move in with you.
Update: They own the building you want to live in
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not allow someone to move in with you.
Update: You know they are very messy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not allow someone to move in with you.
Update: the are homeless and starving.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not allow someone to move in with you.
Update: they have been known to take advantage of others in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to give away something that also belongs to someone else.
Update: that person has agreed to give it away also.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to give away something that also belongs to someone else.
Update: the object means something to the person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to give away something that also belongs to someone else.
Update: You and your partner are having a yard sale
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to give away something that also belongs to someone else.
Update: They didn’t know you took the item
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to give away something that also belongs to someone else.
Update: You are passing down heirloom jewelry.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to give away something that also belongs to someone else.
Update: You don't know the person it belongs to.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to give away something that also belongs to someone else.
Update: They wanted you to give it away so you can pay it forward.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to give away something that also belongs to someone else.
Update: They will ask for it back eventually.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to give away something that also belongs to someone else.
Update: You have the other person's permission to do so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to give away something that also belongs to someone else.
Update: You do not have the other person's permission.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be sexually attracted to someone.
Update: That person is underage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be sexually attracted to someone.
Update: That person is a model
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be sexually attracted to someone.
Update: That person is five years old.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be sexually attracted to someone.
Update: That person is a supermodel.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be sexually attracted to someone.
Update: That someone is your relative.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be sexually attracted to someone.
Update: You have been without sexual release for a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be sexually attracted to someone.
Update: The person has never shown any interest in you ever whatsoever.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be sexually attracted to someone.
Update: The person is your spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be sexually attracted to someone.
Update: They are children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be sexually attracted to someone.
Update: You are dating them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should be patient with the shortcomings of a partner.
Update: They have repeatedly ignored your requests.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should be patient with the shortcomings of a partner.
Update: You have only just told them about a shortcoming.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should be patient with the shortcomings of a partner.
Update: your partner never tries to improve.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should be patient with the shortcomings of a partner.
Update: you love them and want to be with them for the rest of your life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should be patient with the shortcomings of a partner.
Update: they are not willing to better themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should be patient with the shortcomings of a partner.
Update: they are trying to grow as a person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should be patient with the shortcomings of a partner.
Update: their partner is always letting them down
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should be patient with the shortcomings of a partner.
Update: their partner doesn't usually do anything that would be consider a shortcoming
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should be patient with the shortcomings of a partner.
Update: these shortcomings are seriously harmful.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should be patient with the shortcomings of a partner.
Update: it is just minor things,
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always be respectful of pregnant people.
Update: They are robbing a bank.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always be respectful of pregnant people.
Update: You work with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always be respectful of pregnant people.
Update: they are having a difficult time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always be respectful of pregnant people.
Update: They start criticizing how you're raising your child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always be respectful of pregnant people.
Update: You're a gynecologist.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always be respectful of pregnant people.
Update: they are being exceptionally rude to children
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always be respectful of pregnant people.
Update: they are experiencing an influx of strong hormones
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always be respectful of pregnant people.
Update: A pregnant person is very rude to you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always be respectful of pregnant people.
Update: The person is your own wife
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep promises you make.
Update: you had an emergency come up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep promises you make.
Update: you had plenty of time to do the promise.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep promises you make.
Update: They are impossible to keep.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep promises you make.
Update: You want others to trust you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep promises you make.
Update: You are sick and cannot make an event.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep promises you make.
Update: You want to be seen as trustworthy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep promises you make.
Update: keeping a promise can harm your health.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep promises you make.
Update: people place value in your commitments.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep promises you make.
Update: You promised to hurt someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep promises you make.
Update: You want them to keep their word with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Using dating apps while already in a relationship is frowned upon.
Update: You're presenting yourself as being single.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Using dating apps while already in a relationship is frowned upon.
Update: You're in an open relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Using dating apps while already in a relationship is frowned upon.
Update: You're in a monogamous relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Using dating apps while already in a relationship is frowned upon.
Update: you have an open relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Using dating apps while already in a relationship is frowned upon.
Update: you are married and have children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Using dating apps while already in a relationship is frowned upon.
Update: You and your partner are on the app together.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Using dating apps while already in a relationship is frowned upon.
Update: You want to cheat on your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Using dating apps while already in a relationship is frowned upon.
Update: you are looking for someone to hookup with you and your partner
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Using dating apps while already in a relationship is frowned upon.
Update: your significant other doesn't know about it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: their behavior is affecting you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: it has nothing to do with you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: They are being lazy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: They are being respectful of your space.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: you are assigning them chores
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: your roommate is a free spirit
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: you own the house and the roommate is not holding up their duties.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: your roommate is paying more of the bills than you are.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: they are asking for advice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: you are just acquaintances.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep your nose out of your ex's business.
Update: It involves your child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep your nose out of your ex's business.
Update: You want to move on.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep your nose out of your ex's business.
Update: That business involves you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep your nose out of your ex's business.
Update: That business doesn't involve you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep your nose out of your ex's business.
Update: you and your ex have a child together.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep your nose out of your ex's business.
Update: you want your ex to stay out of your business.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep your nose out of your ex's business.
Update: They are doing something illegal or hurtful to someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep your nose out of your ex's business.
Update: They are not part of your life anymore.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep your nose out of your ex's business.
Update: you are working to get back together with them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep your nose out of your ex's business.
Update: you want them to reciprocate the same to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be rude to other people.
Update: Overlooking their rudeness has worn you down.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be rude to other people.
Update: You are being rude to people who are always polite to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be rude to other people.
Update: you're doing so to protect a friend or partner
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be rude to other people.
Update: you're doing so to get revenge for something
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be rude to other people.
Update: You were repeatedly provoked by the same person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be rude to other people.
Update: You work in the public sector.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be rude to other people.
Update: they were very rude to you first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be rude to other people.
Update: they were being polite to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be rude to other people.
Update: You are doing a comedy roast of them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be rude to other people.
Update: You want them to like you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to speak out against behavior that harms others.
Update: It could get you fired
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to speak out against behavior that harms others.
Update: It is a pattern behavior
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to speak out against behavior that harms others.
Update: speaking out against the behavior could get your loved ones killed
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to speak out against behavior that harms others.
Update: the people being harmed are innocent
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to speak out against behavior that harms others.
Update: speaking out also harms others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to speak out against behavior that harms others.
Update: speaking out can help people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to speak out against behavior that harms others.
Update: Doing so would harm you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to speak out against behavior that harms others.
Update: It could change the behavior.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to speak out against behavior that harms others.
Update: You put yourself in danger by speaking.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to speak out against behavior that harms others.
Update: You consider yourself an ally to a group.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's polite for a child to ask their parents to do something.
Update: They are trying to get their parent to not drink and drive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's polite for a child to ask their parents to do something.
Update: They want to go to the amusement park.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's polite for a child to ask their parents to do something.
Update: The child is asking over and over after the parents said no.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's polite for a child to ask their parents to do something.
Update: It's something they haven't done before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's polite for a child to ask their parents to do something.
Update: Their parent is drunk
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's polite for a child to ask their parents to do something.
Update: The child is a teenager
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's polite for a child to ask their parents to do something.
Update: they constantly do it all the time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's polite for a child to ask their parents to do something.
Update: they said please and were very nice.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's polite for a child to ask their parents to do something.
Update: The child is now an adult.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's polite for a child to ask their parents to do something.
Update: The child needs official parental permission to do something.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry if you are being harassed.
Update: You are also harassing someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry if you are being harassed.
Update: You have a restraining order.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry if you are being harassed.
Update: that harassment is intended as jest and they don't know it upsets you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry if you are being harassed.
Update: you've tried telling them to stop it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry if you are being harassed.
Update: You were doing the harassing first and this is retaliation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry if you are being harassed.
Update: You are being harassed unprovoked.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry if you are being harassed.
Update: You don't notice the harassment.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be angry if you are being harassed.
Update: The harassment is sexual in nature.
Update type: strengthener