tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is bad to take away someone's needs
Update: It's a life or death situation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to take away someone's needs
Update: You are trying to develop a trusting relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Dogs can be a big part of the fun in your life.
Update: You're highly allergic to dogs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Dogs can be a big part of the fun in your life.
Update: You love animals.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Dogs can be a big part of the fun in your life.
Update: You can't afford to properly take care of it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Dogs can be a big part of the fun in your life.
Update: You have trouble relating to other people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Dogs can be a big part of the fun in your life.
Update: You're allergic to dogs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Dogs can be a big part of the fun in your life.
Update: Your dog knows a lot of tricks.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Dogs can be a big part of the fun in your life.
Update: You are allergic to dogs
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Dogs can be a big part of the fun in your life.
Update: You have anxiety
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Dogs can be a big part of the fun in your life.
Update: You have children who hate dogs
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Dogs can be a big part of the fun in your life.
Update: You have always been a dog person
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to not satisfy your partner
Update: They make an unreasonable request.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to not satisfy your partner
Update: You like to do what they ask.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to not satisfy your partner
Update: you are sick.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to not satisfy your partner
Update: you want to build a strong relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to not satisfy your partner
Update: Your partner refuses to try to satisfy you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to not satisfy your partner
Update: You care about your partner and their happiness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to not satisfy your partner
Update: Your partner sets unreasonable standards.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to not satisfy your partner
Update: Your partner's standards are low.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to not satisfy your partner
Update: You are enabling a dangerous behavior.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to not satisfy your partner
Update: they have had a bad day.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be concerned about a family member.
Update: you are being selfish.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be concerned about a family member.
Update: they are sick.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be concerned about a family member.
Update: You have never met them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be concerned about a family member.
Update: You know them well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be concerned about a family member.
Update: The family member is doing well and is happy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be concerned about a family member.
Update: The family member lost their job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be concerned about a family member.
Update: That family member has abused you for years and you've cut ties with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be concerned about a family member.
Update: The two of you are very close and they are ill.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be concerned about a family member.
Update: Your family member took care of you a lot
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is controlling to determine what someone can do without you.
Update: That person is in training.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is controlling to determine what someone can do without you.
Update: You are married to the other person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is controlling to determine what someone can do without you.
Update: they are your 4 year old child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is controlling to determine what someone can do without you.
Update: they are your spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is controlling to determine what someone can do without you.
Update: This is a child that needs direction
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is controlling to determine what someone can do without you.
Update: It is a stranger who you know nothing about.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is controlling to determine what someone can do without you.
Update: You're someone's probation officer.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is controlling to determine what someone can do without you.
Update: You're controlling your partner's actions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to refuse to help a friend.
Update: Your friend is asking you to help them commit robbery at gunpoint.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to refuse to help a friend.
Update: Your friend is asking for medical assistance while they're having a severe allergic reaction.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to refuse to help a friend.
Update: You are enabling their problem if you help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to refuse to help a friend.
Update: You are capable of providing the help they need.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to refuse to help a friend.
Update: Your friend is asking to help get drugs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to refuse to help a friend.
Update: Your friend is desperate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to refuse to help a friend.
Update: The friend asks you to cheat on a test for her.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to refuse to help a friend.
Update: The friend always helps you out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to refuse to help a friend.
Update: you can't get out of working.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to refuse to help a friend.
Update: you have the time to help them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be angry at someone who is abusing drugs.
Update: They are a stranger on the street.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be angry at someone who is abusing drugs.
Update: They are your spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be angry at someone who is abusing drugs.
Update: The person abusing drugs is being forced to abuse them by someone who has power over them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be angry at someone who is abusing drugs.
Update: The person is victimizing you in order to obtain drugs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be angry at someone who is abusing drugs.
Update: You're abusing drugs and would be a hypocrite.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be angry at someone who is abusing drugs.
Update: You're their parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be angry at someone who is abusing drugs.
Update: They are sad and want help for their issues
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be angry at someone who is abusing drugs.
Update: They have children who don’t understand what is going on
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be angry at someone who is abusing drugs.
Update: You have never met the person before.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be angry at someone who is abusing drugs.
Update: The person is your child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to not borrow money from friends.
Update: You are desperate and can pay them back later.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to not borrow money from friends.
Update: You would have difficulty paying them back.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to not borrow money from friends.
Update: they borrow from you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to not borrow money from friends.
Update: you make more money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to not borrow money from friends.
Update: You have no other options.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to not borrow money from friends.
Update: There are other options available.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to not borrow money from friends.
Update: you lost your wallet and you can pay them back via Venmo.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to not borrow money from friends.
Update: if you do not have the money to pay them back.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to not borrow money from friends.
Update: You pay things back on time
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to not borrow money from friends.
Update: You don't have a stable job
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want out of a relationship.
Update: They are abusing you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want out of a relationship.
Update: Your partner is loving and wants to get married
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want out of a relationship.
Update: Your partner abuses you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want out of a relationship.
Update: the other person is your soulmate.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want out of a relationship.
Update: The two of you have nothing in common.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want out of a relationship.
Update: You just started it seconds ago.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want out of a relationship.
Update: Your partner has already been unfaithful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want out of a relationship.
Update: You only want out because the person is trying to force you to get help for an addiction.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want out of a relationship.
Update: The person is toxic and the relationship isn't healthy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You do not have to be close to someone just because they are family.
Update: This family member is your child and there is no one else to take care of him.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You do not have to be close to someone just because they are family.
Update: The family member has abused you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You do not have to be close to someone just because they are family.
Update: You are their custodial parent and they are a child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You do not have to be close to someone just because they are family.
Update: They are toxic and dangerous.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You do not have to be close to someone just because they are family.
Update: They are on their death bed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You do not have to be close to someone just because they are family.
Update: They have abused yourself or others in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You do not have to be close to someone just because they are family.
Update: You're that person's care taker.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You do not have to be close to someone just because they are family.
Update: That person is unkind to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You do not have to be close to someone just because they are family.
Update: Your parents raised the family to be close-knit.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You do not have to be close to someone just because they are family.
Update: Family members have different values and outlooks.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your loved ones to live as long as possible.
Update: They're in intense pain and beg you to allowed them to commit assisted suicide.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your loved ones to live as long as possible.
Update: They're still active and have a good quality of life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your loved ones to live as long as possible.
Update: Your loved one is suffering.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your loved ones to live as long as possible.
Update: Your loved one is an infant.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your loved ones to live as long as possible.
Update: they have a terminal illness.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your loved ones to live as long as possible.
Update: you are going to have kids.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your loved ones to live as long as possible.
Update: Your loved one has a terminal illness and they request to go through a "death with dignity" procedure.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your loved ones to live as long as possible.
Update: They are in perfect physical health.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your loved ones to live as long as possible.
Update: They are hoping to die soon because of their religious beliefs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want your loved ones to live as long as possible.
Update: You rely on them for emotional support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to allow anyone in your home that scares you.
Update: They are trying to break into your house.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to allow anyone in your home that scares you.
Update: The police have a warrant to search your home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to allow anyone in your home that scares you.
Update: The people at the door do not have identification.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to allow anyone in your home that scares you.
Update: That person is your child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to allow anyone in your home that scares you.
Update: That person is homeless.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to allow anyone in your home that scares you.
Update: They are in immediate danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to allow anyone in your home that scares you.
Update: They are a stranger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to allow anyone in your home that scares you.
Update: The people are police with a warrant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to allow anyone in your home that scares you.
Update: you don't know the person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Calling in a noise complaint on someone is rude
Update: They are loud, drunk, and obnoxious.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Calling in a noise complaint on someone is rude
Update: The noise is a crying baby who is sick.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Calling in a noise complaint on someone is rude
Update: It's four in the morning.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Calling in a noise complaint on someone is rude
Update: It's in the middle of the day.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Calling in a noise complaint on someone is rude
Update: You've asked them politely to be more quiet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Calling in a noise complaint on someone is rude
Update: They let you know ahead of time about a weekend party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Calling in a noise complaint on someone is rude
Update: You have already asked them once to be quiet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Calling in a noise complaint on someone is rude
Update: You haven't asked them to be quieter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Calling in a noise complaint on someone is rude
Update: It is 3:00 A.M. and adults are making the noise.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Calling in a noise complaint on someone is rude
Update: It is 3:00 P.M. and children are making the noise.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be angry at someone for an accident.
Update: They were driving drunk.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be angry at someone for an accident.
Update: The accident was your fault.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be angry at someone for an accident.
Update: This isn't the first time and you suspect they will do it again.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be angry at someone for an accident.
Update: The person is apologetic and sincere.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be angry at someone for an accident.
Update: you specifically advised them not to do something.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be angry at someone for an accident.
Update: they are just a toddler.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be angry at someone for an accident.
Update: You know they were inebriated at the time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be angry at someone for an accident.
Update: You know they were trying their best.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be angry at someone for an accident.
Update: They were driving under the influence.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be angry at someone for an accident.
Update: They were harmed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Roommates are expected to respect each other's privacy.
Update: One roommate is suspected of theft.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Roommates are expected to respect each other's privacy.
Update: Each roommate locks their door.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Roommates are expected to respect each other's privacy.
Update: They hear the other roommate fall to the floor, and want to check if that person is okay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Roommates are expected to respect each other's privacy.
Update: The other roommate's lover is visiting.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Roommates are expected to respect each other's privacy.
Update: One of the roommates has been stealing and a camera needs to be installed to get proof.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Roommates are expected to respect each other's privacy.
Update: They are in the bathroom taking a shower.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Roommates are expected to respect each other's privacy.
Update: There is a fear the person is in danger or having a medical emergency.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Roommates are expected to respect each other's privacy.
Update: They have asked for privacy specifically.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Roommates are expected to respect each other's privacy.
Update: They suspect their roommate is overdosing in the next room.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Roommates are expected to respect each other's privacy.
Update: They are living in unisex housing and people could be getting undressed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful to not spill your food.
Update: You are creating an art piece.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful to not spill your food.
Update: The table cloth is brand new.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful to not spill your food.
Update: You're having a food fight.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful to not spill your food.
Update: You're eating in a swimming pool.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful to not spill your food.
Update: You are eating outside at a picnic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful to not spill your food.
Update: You have white carpeting and upholstery.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful to not spill your food.
Update: You want to put some on the ground for a starving animal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful to not spill your food.
Update: You have very little food to eat.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful to not spill your food.
Update: You're putting it in the garbage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful to not spill your food.
Update: You're wearing a white shirt.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's irresponsible not to take care of you pets.
Update: you have a service taking care of them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's irresponsible not to take care of you pets.
Update: you are sitting at home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's irresponsible not to take care of you pets.
Update: You are in the hospital.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's irresponsible not to take care of you pets.
Update: You have a lot of time and money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's irresponsible not to take care of you pets.
Update: You have unexpected financial problems.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's irresponsible not to take care of you pets.
Update: You have had them for several years.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's irresponsible not to take care of you pets.
Update: You are also a veterinarian and people entrust their animals with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's irresponsible not to take care of you pets.
Update: you hire someone to take care of them for you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's irresponsible not to take care of you pets.
Update: you are all they have.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always consult with someone before discarding their things.
Update: They're a hoarder and some of their things are biohazards.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always consult with someone before discarding their things.
Update: They don't have enough money to easily replace anything you throw out by mistake.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always consult with someone before discarding their things.
Update: They have passed on and did not leave a will.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always consult with someone before discarding their things.
Update: They said that they were going to come back to pick up their item.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always consult with someone before discarding their things.
Update: The person has died.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always consult with someone before discarding their things.
Update: The person has a lot of cherished mementos.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always consult with someone before discarding their things.
Update: They have said they do not want those things
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always consult with someone before discarding their things.
Update: They have asked you to hold them for you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always consult with someone before discarding their things.
Update: you are their mother and you bought them new underwear and are throwing the old away.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always consult with someone before discarding their things.
Update: you don't know what the items are used for.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't pry into people's love lives.
Update: you suspect the relationship is abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't pry into people's love lives.
Update: you want to keep friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't pry into people's love lives.
Update: You're a therapist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't pry into people's love lives.
Update: You're a receptionist.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't pry into people's love lives.
Update: You work as a therapist for couples.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't pry into people's love lives.
Update: The person asked you to respect their privacy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't pry into people's love lives.
Update: You are trying to help their relationship
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't pry into people's love lives.
Update: They have asked you to respec their privacy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't pry into people's love lives.
Update: They ask you first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't pry into people's love lives.
Update: You don't know the people well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to protect your child from an ex.
Update: it is their loving parent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to protect your child from an ex.
Update: they were neglectful.
Update type: strengthener