tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is foolish to endanger many friendships when upset about one.
Update: the one friendship is more important than all the others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is foolish to endanger many friendships when upset about one.
Update: it means you risk losing all your friends, and not just the one.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is foolish to endanger many friendships when upset about one.
Update: That one is your best friend and you don't want to lose them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is foolish to endanger many friendships when upset about one.
Update: That one friend has been a bad influence on you and your other friends are just trying to protect you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is foolish to endanger many friendships when upset about one.
Update: You discover that all of your friends behave in the same way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is foolish to endanger many friendships when upset about one.
Update: You don't have a lot of friends to start with.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is foolish to endanger many friendships when upset about one.
Update: Unless it's one great big group of friends and they all take a stand against you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is foolish to endanger many friendships when upset about one.
Update: Especially if only the one friend has betrayed you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have a romantic attraction to someone.
Update: You are related to that person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have a romantic attraction to someone.
Update: You feel that they are flirting with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have a romantic attraction to someone.
Update: You are not married to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have a romantic attraction to someone.
Update: You are the same age.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have a romantic attraction to someone.
Update: You are already married
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have a romantic attraction to someone.
Update: You are loking for a partner
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have a romantic attraction to someone.
Update: That someone is a child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have a romantic attraction to someone.
Update: You find the person attractive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have a romantic attraction to someone.
Update: The person is one of your relatives.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to have a romantic attraction to someone.
Update: The person is someone you trust deeply.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your phone is your personal privacy and others should not be able to look at it.
Update: you actually share the phone with someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your phone is your personal privacy and others should not be able to look at it.
Update: it is only used by you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your phone is your personal privacy and others should not be able to look at it.
Update: You've taken pictures without authorization.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your phone is your personal privacy and others should not be able to look at it.
Update: Your phone is protected by a pin number.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your phone is your personal privacy and others should not be able to look at it.
Update: you give them permission.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your phone is your personal privacy and others should not be able to look at it.
Update: they are snooping in your personal photos and messages.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your phone is your personal privacy and others should not be able to look at it.
Update: The police are doing an investigation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your phone is your personal privacy and others should not be able to look at it.
Update: Your partner is paranoid thinking you cheated.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your phone is your personal privacy and others should not be able to look at it.
Update: You do work on it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to honor your commitments.
Update: Someone is in trouble.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to honor your commitments.
Update: You promised to attend a funeral.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to honor your commitments.
Update: You want to be an upstanding citizen.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to honor your commitments.
Update: Your commitments are easy to fulfill
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to honor your commitments.
Update: You are sick.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to honor your commitments.
Update: You were the originator of the commitments.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to honor your commitments.
Update: you can not afford to honor them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to honor your commitments.
Update: you want people to respect you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't talk behind people's backs.
Update: You are a spy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't talk behind people's backs.
Update: You want people to like you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't talk behind people's backs.
Update: You're slandering them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't talk behind people's backs.
Update: You are trying to spare your friend's feelings.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't talk behind people's backs.
Update: Everyone is known to gossip.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't talk behind people's backs.
Update: You are planning a surprise party for someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't talk behind people's backs.
Update: You are gossiping about a close friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't talk behind people's backs.
Update: They are doing that you want to get people to help do an intervention.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't talk behind people's backs.
Update: The people you are talking about are your friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a gift you don't like, you should exchange it for something you do like.
Update: it was a really thought out gift that you got
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a gift you don't like, you should exchange it for something you do like.
Update: the gift card is for certain stores but it would have more benefit to you if you bought a different gift card instead
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a gift you don't like, you should exchange it for something you do like.
Update: The gift is engraved.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a gift you don't like, you should exchange it for something you do like.
Update: The gift has no use and is ugly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a gift you don't like, you should exchange it for something you do like.
Update: It was given with sentimental value.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a gift you don't like, you should exchange it for something you do like.
Update: It's the wrong size.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a gift you don't like, you should exchange it for something you do like.
Update: You know the gift-giver will be offended
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a gift you don't like, you should exchange it for something you do like.
Update: There's something else you need
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a gift you don't like, you should exchange it for something you do like.
Update: There is no gift receipt and you don't know what store it came from.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a gift you don't like, you should exchange it for something you do like.
Update: A gift receipt was included with the gift.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to go on vacation with someone you love.
Update: You cannot afford to go on vacation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to go on vacation with someone you love.
Update: You have accumulated paid time off from work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to go on vacation with someone you love.
Update: The two of you are not making enough money and can't afford a vacation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to go on vacation with someone you love.
Update: You both need some time off and want to strengthen your relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to go on vacation with someone you love.
Update: The person is afraid of flying and you booked them a ticket without telling them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to go on vacation with someone you love.
Update: You are trying to bring the passion back to your marriage
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to go on vacation with someone you love.
Update: You cannot afford to vacation at all
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to go on vacation with someone you love.
Update: Your anniversary is coming up
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to go on vacation with someone you love.
Update: You have to take out a loan to pay for it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to go on vacation with someone you love.
Update: You just got done with a year long project at work
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to stand up for yourself.
Update: you are doing it to be cool.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to stand up for yourself.
Update: There's no reason for you to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to stand up for yourself.
Update: You're being challenged.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to stand up for yourself.
Update: You have a lot at stake
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to stand up for yourself.
Update: You are unarmed and being threatened with a weapon.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to stand up for yourself.
Update: You are being bullied.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to stand up for yourself.
Update: You caused the problem
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to stand up for yourself.
Update: You are being bullied
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your employer is refusing to pay you, it's okay to be angry.
Update: You didn't do the work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your employer is refusing to pay you, it's okay to be angry.
Update: You did the work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your employer is refusing to pay you, it's okay to be angry.
Update: You are slacking off on the job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your employer is refusing to pay you, it's okay to be angry.
Update: You are a hard worker and deserve to be paid.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your employer is refusing to pay you, it's okay to be angry.
Update: You have not completed the job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your employer is refusing to pay you, it's okay to be angry.
Update: You have fulfilled your end of a contracted job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your employer is refusing to pay you, it's okay to be angry.
Update: You recognize that they are eventually going to pay you extra for your patience.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your employer is refusing to pay you, it's okay to be angry.
Update: There is no good reason, they're just being lazy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If your employer is refusing to pay you, it's okay to be angry.
Update: You were stealing money from them the entire time you worked for them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If your employer is refusing to pay you, it's okay to be angry.
Update: They have the money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to not give away your hard earned money
Update: a homeless person really needs it badly
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to not give away your hard earned money
Update: someones forcing you to give them money
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to not give away your hard earned money
Update: You are investing it in a new business venture
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to not give away your hard earned money
Update: You have poor family members and you are rich
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to not give away your hard earned money
Update: You aren’t that wealthy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to not give away your hard earned money
Update: You live in a town ravaged by a tornado.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to not give away your hard earned money
Update: You work six jobs to make ends meet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to not give away your hard earned money
Update: You are a millionaire.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to not give away your hard earned money
Update: You can barely make ends meet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to support people with special needs.
Update: Your impatience and temper mean the best thing you can do is stay out of the way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to support people with special needs.
Update: You're a teacher.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to support people with special needs.
Update: You are learning about social work
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to support people with special needs.
Update: You are cheap and mean.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to support people with special needs.
Update: All people will be able to contribute without barriers.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to support people with special needs.
Update: You are a heartless person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to support people with special needs.
Update: Your own brother is special needs
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to support people with special needs.
Update: you have no knowledge of how to best help them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to support people with special needs.
Update: they are a member of a club you are part of.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your friends to do favors for you.
Update: They have offered to help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your friends to do favors for you.
Update: They are previously engaged with other responsibilities.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your friends to do favors for you.
Update: They owe you one
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your friends to do favors for you.
Update: You didn’t ask them for any
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your friends to do favors for you.
Update: they have already offered to do the favors.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your friends to do favors for you.
Update: you never do anything for them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your friends to do favors for you.
Update: You frequently do favors for them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your friends to do favors for you.
Update: You've refused to help them several times recently.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your friends to do favors for you.
Update: The are really your friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your friends to do favors for you.
Update: You won't do any for them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be in a negative mood around others.
Update: You are being made fun of.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be in a negative mood around others.
Update: You are in a bad mood because of something that happened yesterday.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be in a negative mood around others.
Update: You have just gotten fired from your job for no good reason.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be in a negative mood around others.
Update: You constantly make negative comments in the workplace.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be in a negative mood around others.
Update: you're pregnant
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be in a negative mood around others.
Update: you're in a negative mood for a selfish reason
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be in a negative mood around others.
Update: Unless they are the reason you are in a negative mood.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be in a negative mood around others.
Update: Especially if they are not the reason you are in a negative mood.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be in a negative mood around others.
Update: You just got fired
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be in a negative mood around others.
Update: You are at your best friends wedding
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to get upset at your partner.
Update: they promised to call you but didn't
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to get upset at your partner.
Update: it's not their fault they got ill
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to get upset at your partner.
Update: They are abusive to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to get upset at your partner.
Update: They apologize for a mistake.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to get upset at your partner.
Update: They did something you begged them not to do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to get upset at your partner.
Update: They're trying their best to be supportive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to get upset at your partner.
Update: Your partner lost their wedding ring
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to get upset at your partner.
Update: They were trying to take care of you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to get upset at your partner.
Update: They poked you in the eye during an argument.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to get upset at your partner.
Update: They haven't slept in days.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to do something that could hurt someone that cares about you.
Update: You are trying to save their life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to do something that could hurt someone that cares about you.
Update: You have other options.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to do something that could hurt someone that cares about you.
Update: You have to choose your child over them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to do something that could hurt someone that cares about you.
Update: They are prone to bouts of sadness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to do something that could hurt someone that cares about you.
Update: It is a dental procedure.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to do something that could hurt someone that cares about you.
Update: You are aware that flirting has negative consequences.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to do something that could hurt someone that cares about you.
Update: That person is your spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to do something that could hurt someone that cares about you.
Update: You didn't know the consequences of your actions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to do something that could hurt someone that cares about you.
Update: You had malicious intent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to have an emotional experience with an ex.
Update: your ex is physically abusive to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to have an emotional experience with an ex.
Update: your ex has changed their behavior.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to have an emotional experience with an ex.
Update: You are dating someone new.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to have an emotional experience with an ex.
Update: You are single.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to have an emotional experience with an ex.
Update: you both never got along well
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to have an emotional experience with an ex.
Update: you were dating along time together
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to have an emotional experience with an ex.
Update: You are in a new relationship with another person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to have an emotional experience with an ex.
Update: You need to find closure.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to have an emotional experience with an ex.
Update: You have a new partner
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to have an emotional experience with an ex.
Update: You still have feelings for them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that sometimes a group wants a new leader.
Update: The government insists that the current leader is the best option.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that sometimes a group wants a new leader.
Update: The current leader is bringing harm to the group
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that sometimes a group wants a new leader.
Update: They just elected a new leader.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that sometimes a group wants a new leader.
Update: The group leader is cruel.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that sometimes a group wants a new leader.
Update: They still have a leader that is very supportive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that sometimes a group wants a new leader.
Update: The leader that they have is doing a poor job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that sometimes a group wants a new leader.
Update: They have not given the old leader a fair chance and reject him without cause.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that sometimes a group wants a new leader.
Update: The old leader doesn't listen to anyone and acts like a despot.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that sometimes a group wants a new leader.
Update: The current leader is the best one
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that sometimes a group wants a new leader.
Update: The current leader is disliked
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be considerate of others.
Update: They are driving.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be considerate of others.
Update: there is a fire and people are trying to get out fast
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be considerate of others.
Update: you are in a very formal meeting
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be considerate of others.
Update: those others have been rude to them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be considerate of others.
Update: others are considerate of them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be considerate of others.
Update: They don't care about societal norms.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be considerate of others.
Update: They are in a position of leadership.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be considerate of others.
Update: You are currently arguing with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be considerate of others.
Update: You are more wealthy than those around you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to not spend time with family members.
Update: You are busy with work or school.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to not spend time with family members.
Update: You are at a family reunion.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to not spend time with family members.
Update: You are busy with work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to not spend time with family members.
Update: You are missing out on the important moments.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to not spend time with family members.
Update: you are injured and unable to be with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to not spend time with family members.
Update: it is the holidays and all family members have gotten together.
Update type: strengthener