tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is rude to stop talking to someone that thinks you are friends.
Update: This person said very insulting things about you and your family
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to stop talking to someone that thinks you are friends.
Update: You have shared many good years together
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to stop talking to someone that thinks you are friends.
Update: They are creepy
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to stop talking to someone that thinks you are friends.
Update: You have been friends for years
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to stop talking to someone that thinks you are friends.
Update: That person had an affair with your significant other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to stop talking to someone that thinks you are friends.
Update: The person has always been loyal to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to stop talking to someone that thinks you are friends.
Update: They're yelling at you in a rude manner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to stop talking to someone that thinks you are friends.
Update: You were acting like you were friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Telling your significant other how to behave can lead to them resenting you or breaking up.
Update: you are also encouraging while you do it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Telling your significant other how to behave can lead to them resenting you or breaking up.
Update: you do it in a bossy way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Telling your significant other how to behave can lead to them resenting you or breaking up.
Update: Unless you are advising them on important protocol for an event.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Telling your significant other how to behave can lead to them resenting you or breaking up.
Update: Especially if you treat them like a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Telling your significant other how to behave can lead to them resenting you or breaking up.
Update: They get sloppy when they are drunk
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Telling your significant other how to behave can lead to them resenting you or breaking up.
Update: They know how to behave themselves
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Telling your significant other how to behave can lead to them resenting you or breaking up.
Update: your significant other secretly likes that.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Telling your significant other how to behave can lead to them resenting you or breaking up.
Update: you make your significant other feel like a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Telling your significant other how to behave can lead to them resenting you or breaking up.
Update: You are very overbearing
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be responsible for every mistake you make.
Update: You intentionally make the mistakes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be responsible for every mistake you make.
Update: You unintentionally make a few mistakes.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be responsible for every mistake you make.
Update: You live completely by yourself
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be responsible for every mistake you make.
Update: Other people coerced you to do things
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be responsible for every mistake you make.
Update: they are all legitimately your fault.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be responsible for every mistake you make.
Update: they are not all your fault.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be responsible for every mistake you make.
Update: You are president of your country.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be responsible for every mistake you make.
Update: You are three years old.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be responsible for every mistake you make.
Update: another person gave you bad information that led to your mistake.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be responsible for every mistake you make.
Update: you are trying to set a good example for your children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be upset after a betrayal.
Update: You had also been betraying your partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be upset after a betrayal.
Update: You were cheated on by your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be upset after a betrayal.
Update: They did it to save the life of an innocent child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be upset after a betrayal.
Update: You lost all of your money as a result.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be upset after a betrayal.
Update: Unless you are the betrayer.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be upset after a betrayal.
Update: Especially if it was your partner who betrayed you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be upset after a betrayal.
Update: You are the one doing the betraying.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be upset after a betrayal.
Update: You were victimized by it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be upset after a betrayal.
Update: It's about a trivial matter.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be upset after a betrayal.
Update: It's about a serious matter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse people of things if you have no proof.
Update: You are playing a board game like CLUE.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse people of things if you have no proof.
Update: You are a police officer.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse people of things if you have no proof.
Update: They have stolen your things in the past
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse people of things if you have no proof.
Update: They are willing to let you search them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse people of things if you have no proof.
Update: You are already biased against them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse people of things if you have no proof.
Update: They have informed you that they did something wrong.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't accuse people of things if you have no proof.
Update: They are telling you that you are accusing the wrong person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to misrepresent something when selling it.
Update: You are in a desperate need for money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to misrepresent something when selling it.
Update: The person you are selling to does not have a lot of money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to misrepresent something when selling it.
Update: Unless you believe you're telling the truth.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to misrepresent something when selling it.
Update: Especially if you know you are misrepresenting it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to misrepresent something when selling it.
Update: you are doing so by accident.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to misrepresent something when selling it.
Update: you are trying to get people to buy an inferior product.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to misrepresent something when selling it.
Update: You are selling it to a convicted felon and the proceeds are for charity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to misrepresent something when selling it.
Update: You are a trustee of a prestigious university.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to misrepresent something when selling it.
Update: You are understating the capability.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to misrepresent something when selling it.
Update: You are overstating a capability.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to kiss someone who's willing.
Update: They are your family member.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to kiss someone who's willing.
Update: You are willing too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to kiss someone who's willing.
Update: They have herpes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to kiss someone who's willing.
Update: You're both attracted to each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to kiss someone who's willing.
Update: they have bad breath.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to kiss someone who's willing.
Update: you have feelings for them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to kiss someone who's willing.
Update: That person is underage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to kiss someone who's willing.
Update: That person is your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to kiss someone who's willing.
Update: They have the flu.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to kiss someone who's willing.
Update: You have had a crush on them for a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Is it helpful to report an aides possible mental breakdown to the principal.
Update: The breakdown was part of a rehearsal of a play.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Is it helpful to report an aides possible mental breakdown to the principal.
Update: The breakdown included violent language.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Is it helpful to report an aides possible mental breakdown to the principal.
Update: The principal might fire them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Is it helpful to report an aides possible mental breakdown to the principal.
Update: The aide might snap and harm someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Is it helpful to report an aides possible mental breakdown to the principal.
Update: Unless you're not sure if you're right.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Is it helpful to report an aides possible mental breakdown to the principal.
Update: Especially if it affects children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Is it helpful to report an aides possible mental breakdown to the principal.
Update: Students are being traumatized
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to complain about bad service.
Update: you know that the waiter is new.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to complain about bad service.
Update: you spent a lot of money there.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to complain about bad service.
Update: you were paid by somebody to review the company badly even though you didn't actually use the service
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to complain about bad service.
Update: you paid for the service but did not get it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to complain about bad service.
Update: You were served something you are deathly allergic to
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to complain about bad service.
Update: You are majorly pressed for time and just pay and go.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to complain about bad service.
Update: You feel you deserve a discount or refund for it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to complain about bad service.
Update: everything is being done to remedy the situation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to complain about bad service.
Update: you paid a lot of money for the service.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to withhold the necessities of life from someone.
Update: You are not responsible for the other person's well being.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to withhold the necessities of life from someone.
Update: You are their parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to withhold the necessities of life from someone.
Update: They are going to die anyway but they could be used to let another live.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to withhold the necessities of life from someone.
Update: The are bed ridden and cannot get them themselves.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to withhold the necessities of life from someone.
Update: You don't have enough to share.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to withhold the necessities of life from someone.
Update: You have enough to share.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to withhold the necessities of life from someone.
Update: You can give them what they need.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to withhold the necessities of life from someone.
Update: you are trying to get critical answers from them in a crime scenario.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to withhold the necessities of life from someone.
Update: they are starving to death.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being a caretaker is not a job for everyone, which is fine.
Update: You are taking care of your sick child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being a caretaker is not a job for everyone, which is fine.
Update: You have a fear of sick people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being a caretaker is not a job for everyone, which is fine.
Update: you can't find anyone else to help care for your parents.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being a caretaker is not a job for everyone, which is fine.
Update: you can find good quality help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being a caretaker is not a job for everyone, which is fine.
Update: There is a big need for caretakers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being a caretaker is not a job for everyone, which is fine.
Update: You don't have any aptitude for it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being a caretaker is not a job for everyone, which is fine.
Update: a person is squeamish.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being a caretaker is not a job for everyone, which is fine.
Update: they're taking care of someone who's infectious
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your partner make fun of your weight.
Update: it is in good fun and you find it funny as well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your partner make fun of your weight.
Update: it hurts your feelings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your partner make fun of your weight.
Update: You make fun of your partner for similar things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your partner make fun of your weight.
Update: You have an eating disorder.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your partner make fun of your weight.
Update: You are too hard on yourself already.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your partner make fun of your weight.
Update: Your partner is also overweight.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your partner make fun of your weight.
Update: Your partner is athletic.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your partner make fun of your weight.
Update: It is how you joke around
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your partner make fun of your weight.
Update: You are self conscious about it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to feed CBD dog treats to a dog without asking its owner.
Update: You are a co-owner of the dog.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to feed CBD dog treats to a dog without asking its owner.
Update: You are just visiting the dog owner's house.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to feed CBD dog treats to a dog without asking its owner.
Update: The dog is very small
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to feed CBD dog treats to a dog without asking its owner.
Update: The owner has left them on the counter.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to feed CBD dog treats to a dog without asking its owner.
Update: You  know the dog might have a bad reaction.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to feed CBD dog treats to a dog without asking its owner.
Update: The owner showed you how to do it the week before.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to feed CBD dog treats to a dog without asking its owner.
Update: The dog has a history of allergies.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to feed CBD dog treats to a dog without asking its owner.
Update: The dog's owner abandoned it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to feed CBD dog treats to a dog without asking its owner.
Update: The dog is sensitive to certain foods.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to appropriate others' cultures.
Update: You are doing so in a joking matter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to appropriate others' cultures.
Update: You have express permission from people of that culture.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to appropriate others' cultures.
Update: You're making a profit off of marginalized people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to appropriate others' cultures.
Update: it is part of a learning exercise at school.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to appropriate others' cultures.
Update: the culture that is appropriated is a minority culture.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to appropriate others' cultures.
Update: You know nothing about their culture.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to appropriate others' cultures.
Update: unless you are trying to learn more about your husband's culture.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to appropriate others' cultures.
Update: it could be seen as mocking that culture.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to make a fair exchange of two things with equal value
Update: You are trying to pay for items at a retail store with an antique clock.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to make a fair exchange of two things with equal value
Update: You are at a flea market.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to make a fair exchange of two things with equal value
Update: One of the items has sentimental value.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to make a fair exchange of two things with equal value
Update: You do not have a job that pays cash.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to make a fair exchange of two things with equal value
Update: Unless you are committing a crime.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to make a fair exchange of two things with equal value
Update: Especially if you are in retail.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to make a fair exchange of two things with equal value
Update: You're getting rid of a present you were just given.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to make a fair exchange of two things with equal value
Update: You need the other item.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to make a fair exchange of two things with equal value
Update: One item has a sentimental value.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to make a fair exchange of two things with equal value
Update: Both parties agree to it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to leave a restaurant without leaving a tip.
Update: The service was so awful and the food was terrible as well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to leave a restaurant without leaving a tip.
Update: The waitress was kind and punctual and you  liked the food.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to leave a restaurant without leaving a tip.
Update: The restaurant served you raw food.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to leave a restaurant without leaving a tip.
Update: The server tried very hard to make your experience good.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to leave a restaurant without leaving a tip.
Update: It is a fast food restaurant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to leave a restaurant without leaving a tip.
Update: The service was very good.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to leave a restaurant without leaving a tip.
Update: You had bad service.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to leave a restaurant without leaving a tip.
Update: You had good service.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to leave a restaurant without leaving a tip.
Update: the service was really bad
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to leave a restaurant without leaving a tip.
Update: the waiter went above and beyond to help you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to want your children to have your surname.
Update: you are embarrassed by your surname.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to want your children to have your surname.
Update: you are married to their father.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to want your children to have your surname.
Update: Unless you have remarried after a divorce.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to want your children to have your surname.
Update: Especially if it's also their father's surname.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to want your children to have your surname.
Update: Their mother has divorced you and has custody.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to want your children to have your surname.
Update: Your wife has your surname.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to want your children to have your surname.
Update: Your children were adopted at an older age.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to want your children to have your surname.
Update: Your children are biologically related to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to want your children to have your surname.
Update: You have zero plans to be a part of their lives, for example if you were just a sperm donor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to want your children to have your surname.
Update: You want them to continue your family legacy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to wish harm on someone who has hurt you.
Update: you have told others that you forgave them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to wish harm on someone who has hurt you.
Update: it just happened and you aren't over it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to wish harm on someone who has hurt you.
Update: They didn't mean to hurt you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to wish harm on someone who has hurt you.
Update: They tried to kill you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to wish harm on someone who has hurt you.
Update: Harming them would harm other people as well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to wish harm on someone who has hurt you.
Update: You are seeking revenge.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to wish harm on someone who has hurt you.
Update: you are mentally stable.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to wish harm on someone who has hurt you.
Update: you have revenge fantasies.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to wish harm on someone who has hurt you.
Update: they hurt you by accident.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to wish harm on someone who has hurt you.
Update: they have done something to harm your family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You are quoting from a classic literary work, such as Huckleberry Finn.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: Your grown child has married someone of a different race and they have biracial children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You're giving an example of racism.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You're talking to a diverse crowd.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You are giving a lecture about what constitutes racism.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You are speaking to a person of the target race.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: you are citing from the literature verbatim.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: you are raising young kids.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You're quoting something for historical record.
Update type: weakener