tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's understandable to accidentally mishandle a situation.
Update: this is the first time you have
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to accidentally mishandle a situation.
Update: you under pressure because of time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to accidentally mishandle a situation.
Update: you weren't being careful
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to accidentally mishandle a situation.
Update: it was your first time in that situation
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to accidentally mishandle a situation.
Update: you knew it would end badly but did it anyway.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to accidentally mishandle a situation.
Update: it was completely out of your control
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is your right to set bounderies over who can come to your home.
Update: You have boundary issues when it comes to your personal space.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is your right to set bounderies over who can come to your home.
Update: The house is paid for by your roommate.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is your right to set bounderies over who can come to your home.
Update: You live with your elderly grandmother.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is your right to set bounderies over who can come to your home.
Update: You're setting boundaries against the landlord coming in.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is your right to set bounderies over who can come to your home.
Update: You're setting boundaries about your children's friends coming over.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is your right to set bounderies over who can come to your home.
Update: You're banning your own minor child from coming over.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is your right to set bounderies over who can come to your home.
Update: You have a restraining order against someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is your right to set bounderies over who can come to your home.
Update: They are your roommates friends and family.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is your right to set bounderies over who can come to your home.
Update: If they have something abusive or disrespectful to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should pay back your partner.
Update: They specifically told you not to pay them back.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should pay back your partner.
Update: They are struggling financially.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should pay back your partner.
Update: They told you not to
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should pay back your partner.
Update: They lent you a lot of money
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should pay back your partner.
Update: they said you do not need too.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should pay back your partner.
Update: you made an agreement to pay.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should pay back your partner.
Update: Your partner owes you money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should pay back your partner.
Update: You owe money to your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should pay back your partner.
Update: your partner insists you don't.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should pay back your partner.
Update: you have always done things that way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should help your significant other follow their dreams.
Update: The dreams are dangerous and harmful to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should help your significant other follow their dreams.
Update: You want to show your support to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should help your significant other follow their dreams.
Update: Their dreams are not healthy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should help your significant other follow their dreams.
Update: You know they can achieve them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should help your significant other follow their dreams.
Update: their dreams are dangerous
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should help your significant other follow their dreams.
Update: you support your partner unconditionally
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should help your significant other follow their dreams.
Update: it costs too much money to do so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should help your significant other follow their dreams.
Update: if it is possible for them too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should help your significant other follow their dreams.
Update: their dreams put your family at risk.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should help your significant other follow their dreams.
Update: their dreams involve making a better life for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ruin the mood during sex.
Update: You have to leave for work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ruin the mood during sex.
Update: You're trying to make a baby.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ruin the mood during sex.
Update: you are uncomfortable or in pain.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ruin the mood during sex.
Update: you both are enjoying it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ruin the mood during sex.
Update: Your partner is into role playing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't ruin the mood during sex.
Update: You're trying to have a baby.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to call people names.
Update: That name is "doctor" or "sir"
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to call people names.
Update: You are being mean with the namecalling.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to call people names.
Update: they've earned the name through their poor behavior
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to call people names.
Update: they're a friend of yours
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to call people names.
Update: it is a name of endearment.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to call people names.
Update: it is a name that hurts their feelings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to call people names.
Update: The person asked to be roasted.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to call people names.
Update: You are making fun of a young child who doesn't understand why they're being teased.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to call people names.
Update: they are bullying someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to call people names.
Update: they are trying to befriend you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to confront others you see doing wrong
Update: They are wielding a weapon.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to confront others you see doing wrong
Update: They are your underage children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to confront others you see doing wrong
Update: They are armed and you are not.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to confront others you see doing wrong
Update: They are foreign to your customs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to confront others you see doing wrong
Update: You're physical disabled or vulnerable.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to confront others you see doing wrong
Update: You're confident in your ability to handle a confrontation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to confront others you see doing wrong
Update: you think they might physically harm you for doing so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to confront others you see doing wrong
Update: what they are doing will hurt others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to confront others you see doing wrong
Update: People could get hurt.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to confront others you see doing wrong
Update: You work as a security guard.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to switch dorms if your roommate is being unreasonable.
Update: you are not allowed to switch dorms.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to switch dorms if your roommate is being unreasonable.
Update: you really do not get along with your roommate
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to switch dorms if your roommate is being unreasonable.
Update: You will lose your scholarship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to switch dorms if your roommate is being unreasonable.
Update: You think you might be in danger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to switch dorms if your roommate is being unreasonable.
Update: maybe you are being a little unreasonable as well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to switch dorms if your roommate is being unreasonable.
Update: your roommate has made your life miserable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to switch dorms if your roommate is being unreasonable.
Update: You haven't talked to them about the issues yet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to switch dorms if your roommate is being unreasonable.
Update: You've tried talking and haven't gotten anywhere.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to switch dorms if your roommate is being unreasonable.
Update: The other dorm buildings on campus are less safe.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to switch dorms if your roommate is being unreasonable.
Update: The other dorm buildings on campus allow for single bedrooms.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect your employer's rules.
Update: Their rules are obviously immoral and hurtful to you or others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect your employer's rules.
Update: You trust the employer and business and want to develop a good rapport with the company.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect your employer's rules.
Update: You are the owner of the business.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect your employer's rules.
Update: You are a new hire.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect your employer's rules.
Update: The rules violate federal laws
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect your employer's rules.
Update: You want to remain employed
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect your employer's rules.
Update: Those rules contradict federal law.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect your employer's rules.
Update: Those rules are intended to keep everyone safe.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect your employer's rules.
Update: They're discriminatory.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect your employer's rules.
Update: They're in place for good reasons.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to protect their friends.
Update: Their friends are being reprimanded by the boss.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to protect their friends.
Update: Their friends are being attacked at a bar.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to protect their friends.
Update: Their friends are involved in something illegal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to protect their friends.
Update: Their friends have been taken advantage of by someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to protect their friends.
Update: Their friends are cruel people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to protect their friends.
Update: Their friends are kind people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to protect their friends.
Update: they're staying in a different state than their friends
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to protect their friends.
Update: they're out together when something happens
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to protect their friends.
Update: they are both on different teams
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to protect their friends.
Update: they are going to some place dangerous
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not attend someone's birthday party.
Update: You don't know them very well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not attend someone's birthday party.
Update: It is a close friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not attend someone's birthday party.
Update: You have to work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not attend someone's birthday party.
Update: You said you would attend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not attend someone's birthday party.
Update: You don't know the person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not attend someone's birthday party.
Update: It is your child's birthday party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not attend someone's birthday party.
Update: You live in a different state.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not attend someone's birthday party.
Update: The birthday party is for a child and you are their parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not attend someone's birthday party.
Update: you weren't invited
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to not attend someone's birthday party.
Update: they attended yours
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to listen to people talk about uncomfortable subjects.
Update: Unless you are a therapist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to listen to people talk about uncomfortable subjects.
Update: Especially if you are a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to listen to people talk about uncomfortable subjects.
Update: You are a judge.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to listen to people talk about uncomfortable subjects.
Update: You are called for jury duty.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to listen to people talk about uncomfortable subjects.
Update: you're at the doctor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to listen to people talk about uncomfortable subjects.
Update: they are forcing you too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to listen to people talk about uncomfortable subjects.
Update: it is something that you need to learn.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to listen to people talk about uncomfortable subjects.
Update: it doesn't pertain to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to listen to people talk about uncomfortable subjects.
Update: you are sitting in a class.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to listen to people talk about uncomfortable subjects.
Update: you just went through the same problem.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Any reason is valid to not go to a party you don't want to.
Update: You're the guest of honor for the party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Any reason is valid to not go to a party you don't want to.
Update: The party has little to do with you at all.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Any reason is valid to not go to a party you don't want to.
Update: The reason is a lie that would distress others like you heard a rumor someone was going to place a bomb or do a drive by shooting.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Any reason is valid to not go to a party you don't want to.
Update: You are worried  you could not contain your anger  at someone you know will be there.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Any reason is valid to not go to a party you don't want to.
Update: you don't provide that reason before hand
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Any reason is valid to not go to a party you don't want to.
Update: you give the host sufficient foresight to your unavailability
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Any reason is valid to not go to a party you don't want to.
Update: your going to a different party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Any reason is valid to not go to a party you don't want to.
Update: you are ill with a bad cold
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Any reason is valid to not go to a party you don't want to.
Update: you are guest of honor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Any reason is valid to not go to a party you don't want to.
Update: it has illegal substances.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It can be considered cheating to share school notes.
Update: you are studying with a group.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It can be considered cheating to share school notes.
Update: the teacher strictly forbids it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It can be considered cheating to share school notes.
Update: the teacher encourages it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It can be considered cheating to share school notes.
Update: it is during a test.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It can be considered cheating to share school notes.
Update: they are musical notes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It can be considered cheating to share school notes.
Update: they are notes for an important test.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It can be considered cheating to share school notes.
Update: Your teacher asks you to compare notes in groups to review for the test.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It can be considered cheating to share school notes.
Update: It's during a test.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It can be considered cheating to share school notes.
Update: The teacher encourages cooperation
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It can be considered cheating to share school notes.
Update: The notes are being passed during a test
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people tip a waiter for their service.
Update: The waiter is lazy
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people tip a waiter for their service.
Update: The waiter is very good at their job
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people tip a waiter for their service.
Update: You're in a fast food restaurant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people tip a waiter for their service.
Update: You've worked in the service industry before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people tip a waiter for their service.
Update: The waiter did a poor job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people tip a waiter for their service.
Update: Waiters don't make the standard wage.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people tip a waiter for their service.
Update: The service was very bad.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people tip a waiter for their service.
Update: The waiter constantly came back to check on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people tip a waiter for their service.
Update: poor service is given by the waiter.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people tip a waiter for their service.
Update: the waiter gives great service.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to ask for an apology if you do not receive one.
Update: nobody did anything to you at all
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to ask for an apology if you do not receive one.
Update: somebody said a rude thing to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to ask for an apology if you do not receive one.
Update: the other person is unaware that they hurt your feelings.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to ask for an apology if you do not receive one.
Update: you want to move past the incident.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to ask for an apology if you do not receive one.
Update: You offended the other person more than they offended you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to ask for an apology if you do not receive one.
Update: The other person has been court-ordered to provide you an apology.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to ask for an apology if you do not receive one.
Update: The person who threw spaghetti in your face is a toddler who is incapable of apologizing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to ask for an apology if you do not receive one.
Update: Someone deliberately says something hurtful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to ask for an apology if you do not receive one.
Update: the person is a small child who cannot speak yet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to ask for an apology if you do not receive one.
Update: you have been accused of something you did not do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to demand people alter their plans for you.
Update: It is an emergency
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to demand people alter their plans for you.
Update: They have their own life to live
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to demand people alter their plans for you.
Update: The plans are for your birthday.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to demand people alter their plans for you.
Update: The plans are for their birthday.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to demand people alter their plans for you.
Update: It's because of an urgent issue.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to demand people alter their plans for you.
Update: You told them last-minute.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to demand people alter their plans for you.
Update: You are a family member with an emergency situation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to demand people alter their plans for you.
Update: You are not family or even close friends with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to demand people alter their plans for you.
Update: It is an emergency.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to demand people alter their plans for you.
Update: It costs them money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to set rules for everyone without discussion.
Update: You are a parent setting rules for your child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to set rules for everyone without discussion.
Update: You are a supervisor setting rules without the input of your subordinates.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to set rules for everyone without discussion.
Update: You are the parent and the kids needs to listen.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to set rules for everyone without discussion.
Update: You are working in a team.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to set rules for everyone without discussion.
Update: you're the boss.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to set rules for everyone without discussion.
Update: you have no power over the others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to set rules for everyone without discussion.
Update: you are a member of the school board.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to set rules for everyone without discussion.
Update: the rules will mean big changes.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to set rules for everyone without discussion.
Update: there are no other options.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to set rules for everyone without discussion.
Update: you aren't in charge of the group.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to report suspicious activity.
Update: You can get someone innocent in trouble because you don't really know what's going on.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to report suspicious activity.
Update: The activity looks so out of the ordinary and potentially dangerous to others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to report suspicious activity.
Update: You think someone is suspicious merely because of their religion.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to report suspicious activity.
Update: You see what looks like an assault rifle.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to report suspicious activity.
Update: you have no basis for believing it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to report suspicious activity.
Update: fear harm to yourself or others
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to report suspicious activity.
Update: The police make your area more unsafe than safe.
Update type: weakener