tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is not okay to expect someone to give up their job.
Update: They have no other job prospects.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to expect someone to give up their job.
Update: they have been stealing from work
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to expect someone to give up their job.
Update: they have been performing their work well
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to expect someone to give up their job.
Update: Someone has offered to quit their job for you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to expect someone to give up their job.
Update: You're a new manager at the store.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to expect someone to give up their job.
Update: they are no longer able to do the work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to expect someone to give up their job.
Update: they are the best at what they do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is OK to tell a woman she gained weight if you are being honest.
Update: It is someone you barely know
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is OK to tell a woman she gained weight if you are being honest.
Update: She wants you to tell her because she wants to lose weight
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is OK to tell a woman she gained weight if you are being honest.
Update: You know it will severely affect her self-esteem.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is OK to tell a woman she gained weight if you are being honest.
Update: You know she's happy with her body the way it is.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is OK to tell a woman she gained weight if you are being honest.
Update: You're in a relationship with her.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is OK to tell a woman she gained weight if you are being honest.
Update: You're her dietician.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is OK to tell a woman she gained weight if you are being honest.
Update: You have respect for that woman.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is OK to tell a woman she gained weight if you are being honest.
Update: You like to see people cry.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is OK to tell a woman she gained weight if you are being honest.
Update: She has an eating disorder.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is OK to tell a woman she gained weight if you are being honest.
Update: She's nine months pregnant.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to miss a party you've been invited to.
Update: you didn't want to go to it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to miss a party you've been invited to.
Update: you caught a flu right before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to miss a party you've been invited to.
Update: You are very sick.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to miss a party you've been invited to.
Update: You are the guest of honor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to miss a party you've been invited to.
Update: You've been invited to a funeral.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to miss a party you've been invited to.
Update: You're attending your own birthday party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to miss a party you've been invited to.
Update: You hate the hosts
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to miss a party you've been invited to.
Update: The party is the first time you'll be able to see your friends in a long while
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to miss a party you've been invited to.
Update: You know there will be illegal activity at the party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to miss a party you've been invited to.
Update: You've been looking forward to it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you protect your significant other
Update: You and your SO no longer love each other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you protect your significant other
Update: You both are in danger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you protect your significant other
Update: They got into a legal entanglement that you are morally outraged about.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you protect your significant other
Update: They have always had your back throughout the marriage.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you protect your significant other
Update: they are willingly putting themselves in harm's way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you protect your significant other
Update: you are in an emergency situation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you protect your significant other
Update: Your significant other lives far away from you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you protect your significant other
Update: Your significant other lives in your house.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you protect your significant other
Update: You are stranded at sea and there is only room for one person on the boat.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that you protect your significant other
Update: They are smaller and more delicate than you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A person needs to maintain a place to stay for themselves.
Update: They are mentally ill and can’t fend for themselves
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A person needs to maintain a place to stay for themselves.
Update: They make enough money to have nice things and a nice place
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A person needs to maintain a place to stay for themselves.
Update: They live with their parents.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A person needs to maintain a place to stay for themselves.
Update: They just moved out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A person needs to maintain a place to stay for themselves.
Update: They live at their parent's house to care for them in their old age.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A person needs to maintain a place to stay for themselves.
Update: They are over 30 years old.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A person needs to maintain a place to stay for themselves.
Update: They cannot afford a place to stay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A person needs to maintain a place to stay for themselves.
Update: They are a working adult.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A person needs to maintain a place to stay for themselves.
Update: Unless they are married and it's a secret place.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A person needs to maintain a place to stay for themselves.
Update: Especially if they have a high stress job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should give roommates personal space.
Update: They have asked you to join them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should give roommates personal space.
Update: You just met your roommates.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should give roommates personal space.
Update: You are forced to share a bedroom.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should give roommates personal space.
Update: You have your own rooms and bathrooms.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should give roommates personal space.
Update: You share a small room.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should give roommates personal space.
Update: They are trying to study.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should give roommates personal space.
Update: Your roommate is at risk of hurting someone or themself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should give roommates personal space.
Update: Your roommate is trying to have their girlfriend over.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should give roommates personal space.
Update: They are on suicide watch and can't be left alone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should give roommates personal space.
Update: They have repeatedly asked for privacy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be too tough on your children.
Update: Your child suffers from addiction and needs firmness.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be too tough on your children.
Update: A special needs child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be too tough on your children.
Update: They are drug addicts
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be too tough on your children.
Update: They already do well in school and life
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be too tough on your children.
Update: Your children have behavioral issues
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be too tough on your children.
Update: Your children are toddlers
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be too tough on your children.
Update: They continuously misbehave and get in trouble at school.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be too tough on your children.
Update: Your children are well behaved and try their best.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be too tough on your children.
Update: they are bullying other children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be too tough on your children.
Update: you are trying to teach them compassion.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a lazy day every now and then.
Update: Your kids depend on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a lazy day every now and then.
Update: You've been working very hard lately.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a lazy day every now and then.
Update: You have an important project that is due.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a lazy day every now and then.
Update: You want to maintain mental health.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a lazy day every now and then.
Update: You are not working hard on other days.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a lazy day every now and then.
Update: You work really hard other days.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a lazy day every now and then.
Update: You have an assignment due and the deadline is tomorrow.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a lazy day every now and then.
Update: You have had a busy week.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a lazy day every now and then.
Update: Someone is depending on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have a lazy day every now and then.
Update: Especially if you only have to answer to yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should step up and be a step-parent to your partner's kids.
Update: Your partner and your step kids don't need another parent/mother.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should step up and be a step-parent to your partner's kids.
Update: Your step-kids no longer have a biological mother.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should step up and be a step-parent to your partner's kids.
Update: They are grown and no longer live at home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should step up and be a step-parent to your partner's kids.
Update: They are minors still living at home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should step up and be a step-parent to your partner's kids.
Update: They don't want you to be involved.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should step up and be a step-parent to your partner's kids.
Update: They are looking for a co-parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should step up and be a step-parent to your partner's kids.
Update: Your partner's kids are teenagers who don't like you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should step up and be a step-parent to your partner's kids.
Update: The other parent is not involved in your partner's kids lives.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should step up and be a step-parent to your partner's kids.
Update: they have asked you not to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should step up and be a step-parent to your partner's kids.
Update: their children are already familiar with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to end friendships that aren't working for you.
Update: You're being superficial
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to end friendships that aren't working for you.
Update: Someone is being mean.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to end friendships that aren't working for you.
Update: Your friend is suffering from depression due to a recent breakup.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to end friendships that aren't working for you.
Update: You are in an anger management program.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to end friendships that aren't working for you.
Update: You're just being jealous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to end friendships that aren't working for you.
Update: Your friend isn't a good influence.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to end friendships that aren't working for you.
Update: You're not putting any effort into the friendship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to end friendships that aren't working for you.
Update: They're doing harm to your life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to end friendships that aren't working for you.
Update: It is a family friend that you will always have to see.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to end friendships that aren't working for you.
Update: The friend says abusive things to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that you not want to do a specific thing with your friend.
Update: You promised you would do something specific with a friend.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that you not want to do a specific thing with your friend.
Update: You have a phobia of that specific thing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that you not want to do a specific thing with your friend.
Update: You were the one who suggested the idea.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that you not want to do a specific thing with your friend.
Update: You're afraid of the thing your friend wants to do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that you not want to do a specific thing with your friend.
Update: You do not have spare time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that you not want to do a specific thing with your friend.
Update: It is your friend's birthday party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that you not want to do a specific thing with your friend.
Update: The activity involves doing illegal drugs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that you not want to do a specific thing with your friend.
Update: Your friend absolutely needs your support during it and has no one else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable that you not want to do a specific thing with your friend.
Update: Your friend can do the thing perfectly well without you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset at someone who takes in your lost pet.
Update: They put up 'found pet' flyers to try to find the pet's real owner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset at someone who takes in your lost pet.
Update: They try to resist you taking the pet home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset at someone who takes in your lost pet.
Update: it saved their life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset at someone who takes in your lost pet.
Update: they're hiding it from you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset at someone who takes in your lost pet.
Update: They saved your pet's life with care.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset at someone who takes in your lost pet.
Update: They were planning on selling it on the black market.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset at someone who takes in your lost pet.
Update: They have taken good care of it and brought it to the vet to make sure it was okay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset at someone who takes in your lost pet.
Update: They refuse to return it to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset at someone who takes in your lost pet.
Update: You never bothered to look for your pet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset at someone who takes in your lost pet.
Update: Your pet is micro-chipped.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to read messages that aren't directed to you.
Update: It's part of your job as the moderator of a forum.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to read messages that aren't directed to you.
Update: You illegally stole someone's mail to do so.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to read messages that aren't directed to you.
Update: You are an investigative journalist
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to read messages that aren't directed to you.
Update: You are looking over a stranger's shoulders
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to read messages that aren't directed to you.
Update: You suspect your partner is cheating on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to read messages that aren't directed to you.
Update: It's someone's private diary.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to read messages that aren't directed to you.
Update: You are a health care proxy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to read messages that aren't directed to you.
Update: They were medical messages sent in error.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to read messages that aren't directed to you.
Update: They were sent directly to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to read messages that aren't directed to you.
Update: You're snooping through your significant other's phones.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A dad should have the courage to stick up for themselves.
Update: They are in a dangerous situation
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A dad should have the courage to stick up for themselves.
Update: Someone is trying to control them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A dad should have the courage to stick up for themselves.
Update: He would put his family in danger
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A dad should have the courage to stick up for themselves.
Update: His wife is being rude.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A dad should have the courage to stick up for themselves.
Update: He has social anxiety.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A dad should have the courage to stick up for themselves.
Update: He is confident and brave.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A dad should have the courage to stick up for themselves.
Update: They are unable to speak
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A dad should have the courage to stick up for themselves.
Update: Someone is insulting their wife
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: A dad should have the courage to stick up for themselves.
Update: They want to stick up for their right to not vaccinate their kids.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: A dad should have the courage to stick up for themselves.
Update: They want to stick up for their right to spend more time with their children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not set your standards too high.
Update: You are a perfectionist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not set your standards too high.
Update: You do not want to be disappointed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not set your standards too high.
Update: you know that realistically you will never marry an NHL superstar.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not set your standards too high.
Update: You don't want to be disappointed when you never realize your goal of losing 300 pounds.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not set your standards too high.
Update: You have a realistic plan to achieve your goals.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not set your standards too high.
Update: You're not willing to follow through on the work needed to meet those standards.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not set your standards too high.
Update: you have great ambition.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not set your standards too high.
Update: you have not set any goals.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not set your standards too high.
Update: you were told to set them there.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not set your standards too high.
Update: nobody else can meet the standards.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Family members are expected to be kind to each other.
Update: The family members don't know each other well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Family members are expected to be kind to each other.
Update: One family member is sick.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Family members are expected to be kind to each other.
Update: They are estranged from one another.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Family members are expected to be kind to each other.
Update: They are close to each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Family members are expected to be kind to each other.
Update: They hold grudges and have not spoken in years.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Family members are expected to be kind to each other.
Update: They talk to each other daily.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Family members are expected to be kind to each other.
Update: The family is dysfunctional.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Family members are expected to be kind to each other.
Update: They all love each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Family members are expected to be kind to each other.
Update: they are the cause of abuse.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Family members are expected to be kind to each other.
Update: they are in need of support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should do everything you can to support your local community.
Update: Unless your local community doesn't support you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should do everything you can to support your local community.
Update: Especially if your local community supports you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should do everything you can to support your local community.
Update: Your local community is prejudiced against your religion or race.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should do everything you can to support your local community.
Update: Your local community helps take care of your basic needs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should do everything you can to support your local community.
Update: Your community has shunned you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should do everything you can to support your local community.
Update: You want your community to thrive and last a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should do everything you can to support your local community.
Update: Your local community is run by corrupt politicians
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should do everything you can to support your local community.
Update: You know everyone in your community by name
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should do everything you can to support your local community.
Update: They keep calling code enforcement and making nuisance calls to the police trying to run you out of town.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should do everything you can to support your local community.
Update: You and your family actively participate in the perks offered by your community.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone an asshole.
Update: They intentionally harmed you or another.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone an asshole.
Update: They are preparing your food.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone an asshole.
Update: They called you an asshole first, for no reason.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone an asshole.
Update: They are a nice, elderly person.
Update type: strengthener