tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is okay to give someone the same respect they gave you.
Update: you want to be better than a rude person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to give someone the same respect they gave you.
Update: they are a military veteran
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to give someone the same respect they gave you.
Update: they're giving you respect to use you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to give someone the same respect they gave you.
Update: it's a mutually beneficial relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to give someone the same respect they gave you.
Update: They didn't give you any.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to give someone the same respect they gave you.
Update: They were very civil.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to give someone the same respect they gave you.
Update: They have not given you a reason to not show them respect
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You need to understand and back off if someone refuses your sexual advances.
Update: They say NO.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You need to understand and back off if someone refuses your sexual advances.
Update: It is part of your consenting role play and there is a safe word.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You need to understand and back off if someone refuses your sexual advances.
Update: They are married to your cousin.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You need to understand and back off if someone refuses your sexual advances.
Update: You are playing a fantasy game with your close partner and she likes it that way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You need to understand and back off if someone refuses your sexual advances.
Update: You don't know them very well and they are serious.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You need to understand and back off if someone refuses your sexual advances.
Update: The person is interacting in a roleplay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You need to understand and back off if someone refuses your sexual advances.
Update: The person is someone you just met.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to interrupt someone's plans.
Update: They are trying to kill someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to interrupt someone's plans.
Update: They are getting married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to interrupt someone's plans.
Update: Their plans will fail
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to interrupt someone's plans.
Update: Your issues can wait
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to interrupt someone's plans.
Update: Something mega-important has come up that they need to be aware of.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to interrupt someone's plans.
Update: Their plans are very important to them and you are just being a nuisance.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to interrupt someone's plans.
Update: it is an emergency.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to interrupt someone's plans.
Update: the plans are a wedding.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to interrupt someone's plans.
Update: It is due to an emergency.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to interrupt someone's plans.
Update: You expect them to drop everything to do what you want to do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners should discuss important decisions together instead of unilaterally making a choice.
Update: The choice is about what to make for dinner for the week.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Partners should discuss important decisions together instead of unilaterally making a choice.
Update: The choice is about buying a house.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners should discuss important decisions together instead of unilaterally making a choice.
Update: These are irreversible decisions
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners should discuss important decisions together instead of unilaterally making a choice.
Update: The decisions only affect one of the people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Partners should discuss important decisions together instead of unilaterally making a choice.
Update: The decisions affect both people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners should discuss important decisions together instead of unilaterally making a choice.
Update: The decision only affects one partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Partners should discuss important decisions together instead of unilaterally making a choice.
Update: The decision is about whether to have children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners should discuss important decisions together instead of unilaterally making a choice.
Update: it concerns a surprise.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Partners should discuss important decisions together instead of unilaterally making a choice.
Update: it is a big decision.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to joke with friends.
Update: It is an inappropriate joke.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to joke with friends.
Update: They have the same sense of humor as you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to joke with friends.
Update: You are disguising aggression.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to joke with friends.
Update: They joke back.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to joke with friends.
Update: they don't find it funny.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to joke with friends.
Update: you are at a party and everybody is having a good time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to joke with friends.
Update: They are facing criminal charges.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to joke with friends.
Update: You're watching a comedy on television.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to joke with friends.
Update: they are super sensitive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to joke with friends.
Update: you want to share a laugh.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It rude to talk about sex with someone other than your partner.
Update: You are talking to your gynecologist
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It rude to talk about sex with someone other than your partner.
Update: You are sending photos as well
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It rude to talk about sex with someone other than your partner.
Update: You’re having a conversation with your best friend
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It rude to talk about sex with someone other than your partner.
Update: It is someone from the opposite sex
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It rude to talk about sex with someone other than your partner.
Update: you're talking to your doctor
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It rude to talk about sex with someone other than your partner.
Update: you're talking to a stranger of the sex you're attracted to at the bar
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to keep their promises.
Update: They become very ill.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to keep their promises.
Update: They have the ability to do so.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to keep their promises.
Update: Their promises were made under duress and they could never keep it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to keep their promises.
Update: They want others to respect and trust them in the future.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to keep their promises.
Update: An emergency comes up and they have to cancel.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to keep their promises.
Update: They want to seem trustworthy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to keep their promises.
Update: An emergency happens.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to keep their promises.
Update: You want someone to trust you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to keep their promises.
Update: They have moved out of country.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to keep their promises.
Update: Money has exchanged hands.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's choices.
Update: Your partner wants you to get an abortion and you don't believe  in abortion.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's choices.
Update: They are difficult ones to make.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's choices.
Update: Their choices are hurting you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's choices.
Update: Their choices have no impact on your life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's choices.
Update: Those choices seriously hurt other people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's choices.
Update: Those choices are neutral or beneficial to the community.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's choices.
Update: They are discriminating against you or someone else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's choices.
Update: They are an independent adult.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's choices.
Update: Those choices involve bad drugs
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should respect other people's choices.
Update: It isn’t affecting your life
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think someone's morals or ethics are to conservative.
Update: you choose to judge them only on this.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think someone's morals or ethics are to conservative.
Update: you still respect them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think someone's morals or ethics are to conservative.
Update: You are more conservative than them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think someone's morals or ethics are to conservative.
Update: They are against something as trivial as jazz music
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think someone's morals or ethics are to conservative.
Update: You are not very religious.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think someone's morals or ethics are to conservative.
Update: You are rude to their face.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think someone's morals or ethics are to conservative.
Update: They hate gay people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think someone's morals or ethics are to conservative.
Update: Unless you are harassing them about it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to think someone's morals or ethics are to conservative.
Update: Especially if they are super old fashioned.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to limit your child's time with electronic devices.
Update: You think they have a future in computer coding.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to limit your child's time with electronic devices.
Update: They have poor social skills.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to limit your child's time with electronic devices.
Update: They are for educational purposes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to limit your child's time with electronic devices.
Update: They can make them sick and solitary without any friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to limit your child's time with electronic devices.
Update: they have special needs and use them to communicate.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to limit your child's time with electronic devices.
Update: they never go outside anymore.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to limit your child's time with electronic devices.
Update: Your child goes to school online.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to limit your child's time with electronic devices.
Update: Your child is only sleeping four hours a night.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to limit your child's time with electronic devices.
Update: It is snowing outside and your child has a great deal of free time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to limit your child's time with electronic devices.
Update: Your child has homework to do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to dictate who a friend can hang out with.
Update: They are staying at your house and those are part of your parents' rules.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to dictate who a friend can hang out with.
Update: You are endangering the friendship by being too controlling.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to dictate who a friend can hang out with.
Update: Your friend is also your spouse and your spouse cheated on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to dictate who a friend can hang out with.
Update: You don't want to be controlling.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to dictate who a friend can hang out with.
Update: The friend is hanging out with your underage sister.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to dictate who a friend can hang out with.
Update: Your friend is hanging out with kind people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to dictate who a friend can hang out with.
Update: You just want them to stay away from your abusive ex.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to dictate who a friend can hang out with.
Update: You try to emotionally manipulate them into compliance.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to dictate who a friend can hang out with.
Update: Your friend doesn't live in the same city as you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people in your home you don't particularly like.
Update: They are on the lease
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people in your home you don't particularly like.
Update: They are bringing drugs in your house
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people in your home you don't particularly like.
Update: Unless it's your child's birthday party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people in your home you don't particularly like.
Update: Especially if it's your birthday.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people in your home you don't particularly like.
Update: they are paying.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people in your home you don't particularly like.
Update: they are slobs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people in your home you don't particularly like.
Update: They're cops executing a valid search warrant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people in your home you don't particularly like.
Update: They're cops illegally searching your home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people in your home you don't particularly like.
Update: You are hosting a Christmas open house and they showed up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want people in your home you don't particularly like.
Update: they reek of cigarettes and make your furniture stink
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to give up kids for adoption when you can't care for them.
Update: you already a couple years old
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to give up kids for adoption when you can't care for them.
Update: you just gave birth to them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to give up kids for adoption when you can't care for them.
Update: Your family member said they would take custody.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to give up kids for adoption when you can't care for them.
Update: You have a drug problem.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to give up kids for adoption when you can't care for them.
Update: They are attached at the hip to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to give up kids for adoption when you can't care for them.
Update: You have a bad drug habit.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to give up kids for adoption when you can't care for them.
Update: You and your family are very wealthy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to give up kids for adoption when you can't care for them.
Update: You are a single parent without a job or any family support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to give up kids for adoption when you can't care for them.
Update: Your children's other biological parent wants them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to give up kids for adoption when you can't care for them.
Update: Your children's other biological parent doesn't want them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your grown children to want to come live with you, even if you move to where they are.
Update: They're disabled and need help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your grown children to want to come live with you, even if you move to where they are.
Update: They have a career and home of their own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your grown children to want to come live with you, even if you move to where they are.
Update: They cannot pay their bills.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your grown children to want to come live with you, even if you move to where they are.
Update: They have a high paying job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your grown children to want to come live with you, even if you move to where they are.
Update: They don't like talking to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your grown children to want to come live with you, even if you move to where they are.
Update: You have an accident and need to be taken care of.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your grown children to want to come live with you, even if you move to where they are.
Update: They are married and have a large family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your grown children to want to come live with you, even if you move to where they are.
Update: They have kids of their own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your kids tell you what to do with your money.
Update: They are also your financial advisor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your kids tell you what to do with your money.
Update: They have never worked a day in their lives.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your kids tell you what to do with your money.
Update: they are investment bankers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your kids tell you what to do with your money.
Update: they have no money of their own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your kids tell you what to do with your money.
Update: They are financial planners.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your kids tell you what to do with your money.
Update: They are 10 years old.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your kids tell you what to do with your money.
Update: They are asking you to quit smoking so that you can afford food.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your kids tell you what to do with your money.
Update: They are telling you to buy them toys.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your kids tell you what to do with your money.
Update: You can't control your spending
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let your kids tell you what to do with your money.
Update: Your kids are seven years old
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hide things from others.
Update: You're planning a surprise party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hide things from others.
Update: You want them to trust you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hide things from others.
Update: You are planning a surprise.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hide things from others.
Update: You are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hide things from others.
Update: you are planning their birthday party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hide things from others.
Update: you want to build trust.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hide things from others.
Update: you're playing hide and seek
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hide things from others.
Update: you rack up emotional debt by hiding things
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hide things from others.
Update: It would hurt them to find out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hide things from others.
Update: It involves them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to like what you like no matter who created it.
Update: they stole it from the true inventor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to like what you like no matter who created it.
Update: it is a one-of-a-kind creation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to like what you like no matter who created it.
Update: You like Nazi imagery.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to like what you like no matter who created it.
Update: You can separate art from the artist.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to like what you like no matter who created it.
Update: You do not engage in bad behaviors yourself
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to like what you like no matter who created it.
Update: you stole it from a friend
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to like what you like no matter who created it.
Update: it brings you a lot of happiness
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to like what you like no matter who created it.
Update: It was your competition who created it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to like what you like no matter who created it.
Update: You are a fashionista.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for the welfare of animals.
Update: they have nobody else looking out for them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for the welfare of animals.
Update: You're keeping wild animals in your home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for the welfare of animals.
Update: You work for an animal shelter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for the welfare of animals.
Update: it's a vicious predator that is trying to kill you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for the welfare of animals.
Update: you believe intentionally making animals suffer makes you a bad person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for the welfare of animals.
Update: the animal is trying to attack and harm you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for the welfare of animals.
Update: the animal is a newborn and not able to care for itself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for the welfare of animals.
Update: You are neglecting humans.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for the welfare of animals.
Update: You run a rescue farm.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be with a partner that doesn't trust you.
Update: We just started dating and they are beginning to trust you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be with a partner that doesn't trust you.
Update: you have done nothing wrong and they still don’t trust you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be with a partner that doesn't trust you.
Update: You have low self worth
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be with a partner that doesn't trust you.
Update: You are a trustworthy person
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be with a partner that doesn't trust you.
Update: you just need to make more of an effort in the relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be with a partner that doesn't trust you.
Update: you thought it was serious.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be with a partner that doesn't trust you.
Update: You have always been open and honest
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be with a partner that doesn't trust you.
Update: You have kids together.
Update type: weakener