tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's expected that your significant other will have had past relationships.
Update: You and your partner are adults.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to have sympathy for other people.
Update: They cause direct harm to other people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to have sympathy for other people.
Update: They are less privileged than you are.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to have sympathy for other people.
Update: they brought the misery upon themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to have sympathy for other people.
Update: they have had sympathy for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to have sympathy for other people.
Update: They are being unreasonable.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to have sympathy for other people.
Update: They are down on their luck.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to have sympathy for other people.
Update: they've brought misery on themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to have sympathy for other people.
Update: they are really suffering.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to have sympathy for other people.
Update: They are a convicted murderer.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to have sympathy for other people.
Update: They are family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sisters can be very forgiving when you tease them.
Update: They are teenagers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Sisters can be very forgiving when you tease them.
Update: It's just playful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sisters can be very forgiving when you tease them.
Update: they are in the middle of an emotional breakup.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Sisters can be very forgiving when you tease them.
Update: it is done in a loving way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sisters can be very forgiving when you tease them.
Update: the teasing is violent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Sisters can be very forgiving when you tease them.
Update: they like to tease you back.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sisters can be very forgiving when you tease them.
Update: You go too far and seriously injure them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Sisters can be very forgiving when you tease them.
Update: Your teasing causes them to laugh.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Sisters can be very forgiving when you tease them.
Update: They get tired of you teasing them constantly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Sisters can be very forgiving when you tease them.
Update: They know it's all in good fun.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be direct with a family member about a bad quality.
Update: They did their best and aren't capable of doing it any better.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be direct with a family member about a bad quality.
Update: They intentionally tried to produce bad quality.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be direct with a family member about a bad quality.
Update: It's something they are very proud of.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be direct with a family member about a bad quality.
Update: It will help them in the long run.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be direct with a family member about a bad quality.
Update: you are afraid of hurting their feelings.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be direct with a family member about a bad quality.
Update: you think talking about it will help them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be direct with a family member about a bad quality.
Update: it isn't something that is harmful to them or anyone else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be direct with a family member about a bad quality.
Update: it is causing a lot of discord
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be direct with a family member about a bad quality.
Update: They are an infant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be direct with a family member about a bad quality.
Update: It is bad for their health.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to refuse to share a hotel room with your parents.
Update: You're the only one paying for it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to refuse to share a hotel room with your parents.
Update: They can't get another room.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to refuse to share a hotel room with your parents.
Update: you have reserved a large room for them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to refuse to share a hotel room with your parents.
Update: your parents have nowhere else to stay.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to refuse to share a hotel room with your parents.
Update: You are staying with your significant other
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to refuse to share a hotel room with your parents.
Update: One or both parents is in need of special assistance
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to refuse to share a hotel room with your parents.
Update: Your parents have their own room.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to refuse to share a hotel room with your parents.
Update: Your parents need a place to stay.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to refuse to share a hotel room with your parents.
Update: You will be staying out late and would disturb them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to refuse to share a hotel room with your parents.
Update: they are paying.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be asked to leave someone's house in the middle of the night.
Update: you have shown up and come in uninvited.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be asked to leave someone's house in the middle of the night.
Update: they invited you, and you are really far from home with no transportation available.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be asked to leave someone's house in the middle of the night.
Update: you've overstayed your welcome at that person's house
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be asked to leave someone's house in the middle of the night.
Update: you've been drinking and have no means of getting home
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be asked to leave someone's house in the middle of the night.
Update: the house is on fire.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be asked to leave someone's house in the middle of the night.
Update: they don't have anyplace else to go.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be asked to leave someone's house in the middle of the night.
Update: You're a robber.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be asked to leave someone's house in the middle of the night.
Update: You're paying for a bedroom.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be asked to leave someone's house in the middle of the night.
Update: You are robbing the place.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be asked to leave someone's house in the middle of the night.
Update: The weather is very bad.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have casual dating relationships.
Update: you are already married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have casual dating relationships.
Update: you are not in a committed relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have casual dating relationships.
Update: You are married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have casual dating relationships.
Update: You are open and honest about your other relationships.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have casual dating relationships.
Update: You are trying to get married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have casual dating relationships.
Update: You are in your 20's.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have casual dating relationships.
Update: you are already married
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have casual dating relationships.
Update: you are not ready to settle down with one person
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have casual dating relationships.
Update: You are engaged to be married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have casual dating relationships.
Update: You are single and not seeing someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk with your friends about what is bothering you about the relationship.
Update: You know that it will cause one of your friends to become suicidal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk with your friends about what is bothering you about the relationship.
Update: You want things to change in the relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk with your friends about what is bothering you about the relationship.
Update: You no longer wish to be friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk with your friends about what is bothering you about the relationship.
Update: You want the relationship to grow.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk with your friends about what is bothering you about the relationship.
Update: you know it will cause more harm than good.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk with your friends about what is bothering you about the relationship.
Update: you are feeling hurt.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk with your friends about what is bothering you about the relationship.
Update: they have a history of bad relationships.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk with your friends about what is bothering you about the relationship.
Update: they have a history of positive relationships.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk with your friends about what is bothering you about the relationship.
Update: You friend is having a heart attack.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to talk with your friends about what is bothering you about the relationship.
Update: You are trying to build a deeper connection with the friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to play mean jokes on someone.
Update: the other person knows you are going to do it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to play mean jokes on someone.
Update: it scares the other person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to play mean jokes on someone.
Update: It's April Fools Day.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to play mean jokes on someone.
Update: The person gets upset easily.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to play mean jokes on someone.
Update: The person is vulnerable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to play mean jokes on someone.
Update: You are in a comedic act with someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to play mean jokes on someone.
Update: The other person's parents just died.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to play mean jokes on someone.
Update: You are getting someone back for always playing mean pranks on people
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to play mean jokes on someone.
Update: They are very young and get scared easily
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that friends should help each other out.
Update: They live on other ends of the globe and can't even see each other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that friends should help each other out.
Update: One friend is showing signs of being suicidal.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that friends should help each other out.
Update: one friend takes advantage of another.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that friends should help each other out.
Update: the friends help you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that friends should help each other out.
Update: they live in different states.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that friends should help each other out.
Update: they want to be there for each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that friends should help each other out.
Update: You owe the friend a favor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that friends should help each other out.
Update: The friendship is toxic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that friends should help each other out.
Update: They are very close.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is difficult to recommend cryptocurrency.
Update: The person would benefit from using it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is difficult to recommend cryptocurrency.
Update: You do not understand how to correctly explain its use
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is difficult to recommend cryptocurrency.
Update: you believe that it can make you rich.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is difficult to recommend cryptocurrency.
Update: you think it's too big of a risk.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is difficult to recommend cryptocurrency.
Update: It's someone who has lots of time and could benefit from mining it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is difficult to recommend cryptocurrency.
Update: The cryptocurrency market is especially volitile.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is difficult to recommend cryptocurrency.
Update: You've made a lot of money of it yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is difficult to recommend cryptocurrency.
Update: The stock market is doing well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is difficult to recommend cryptocurrency.
Update: you are an expert.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is difficult to recommend cryptocurrency.
Update: you are just learning about it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not good to leave a family waiting for a child that is never coming.
Update: the child is missing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not good to leave a family waiting for a child that is never coming.
Update: you know the child is not coming.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not good to leave a family waiting for a child that is never coming.
Update: You are their fertility doctor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not good to leave a family waiting for a child that is never coming.
Update: You have the child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not good to leave a family waiting for a child that is never coming.
Update: there's still hope that the child may come.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not good to leave a family waiting for a child that is never coming.
Update: they know the child won't be coming ever.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not good to leave a family waiting for a child that is never coming.
Update: The doctor says you might get pregnant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not good to leave a family waiting for a child that is never coming.
Update: You know you can never have a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to remove yourself from a bad relationship.
Update: You are getting physcially abused.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to remove yourself from a bad relationship.
Update: you are a parent of a difficult child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to remove yourself from a bad relationship.
Update: you need to get away to stay sane yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to remove yourself from a bad relationship.
Update: You are gathering evidence against the person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to remove yourself from a bad relationship.
Update: You have been abused by your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to remove yourself from a bad relationship.
Update: you are getting abused emotionally.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine to remove yourself from a bad relationship.
Update: You are the problem in the relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine to remove yourself from a bad relationship.
Update: The relationship isn't working.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to insult another persons children.
Update: the child is sensitive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to insult another persons children.
Update: they are being unreasonable and out of control.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to insult another persons children.
Update: they are family and you're trying to help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to insult another persons children.
Update: Their children intentionally hurt your child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to insult another persons children.
Update: The child is just learning how to speak.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to insult another persons children.
Update: You are friends with the children's parents.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to insult another persons children.
Update: The children are adults.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to insult another persons children.
Update: They are present
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never be snooty in regards to how much money you have.
Update: you are attending an event at the Country Club.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never be snooty in regards to how much money you have.
Update: you know others around you are less fortunate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never be snooty in regards to how much money you have.
Update: You are leaving your money to charity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never be snooty in regards to how much money you have.
Update: You are talking to someone who is underprivileged.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never be snooty in regards to how much money you have.
Update: Unless someone is treating you like you're not a worthy person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never be snooty in regards to how much money you have.
Update: You're talking to someone who's not as well off as you are.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never be snooty in regards to how much money you have.
Update: You are a rich person at a charity.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should never be snooty in regards to how much money you have.
Update: You are trying to appear like others in the group in order to get along.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should never be snooty in regards to how much money you have.
Update: You know the person you are talking to has fallen on hard times.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful of who you choose to live with.
Update: you absolutely have no other person to live with.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful of who you choose to live with.
Update: you have lots of freedom in where you can live.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful of who you choose to live with.
Update: The other option is being homeless.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful of who you choose to live with.
Update: You plan on living there for a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful of who you choose to live with.
Update: You are homeless and it is freezing outside.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful of who you choose to live with.
Update: You have high moral standards.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful of who you choose to live with.
Update: You are a military recruit and have no choice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful of who you choose to live with.
Update: Your name is the one on the lease.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful of who you choose to live with.
Update: you're just living together for a very short time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful of who you choose to live with.
Update: you sign a long term lease together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep expensive things another person gave you after splitting up.
Update: the person insists you keep the items
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep expensive things another person gave you after splitting up.
Update: the items are sentimental to the person you split up with
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep expensive things another person gave you after splitting up.
Update: they were given to you as gifts.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep expensive things another person gave you after splitting up.
Update: you have agreed to split all your holdings 50-50.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep expensive things another person gave you after splitting up.
Update: they said you could
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep expensive things another person gave you after splitting up.
Update: it's personal or embarrassing to the person
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep expensive things another person gave you after splitting up.
Update: They have agreed to split all your belongings.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep expensive things another person gave you after splitting up.
Update: They didn't give permission for you to take the items.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep expensive things another person gave you after splitting up.
Update: The split is even.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep expensive things another person gave you after splitting up.
Update: You are taking everything.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to help others.
Update: They are breaking the law.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to help others.
Update: They are elderly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to help others.
Update: They are homeless and hungry.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to help others.
Update: they don't help you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to help others.
Update: they help you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to help others.
Update: Helping them would hurt you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to help others.
Update: You have the means to do so.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to help others.
Update: You are homeless.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to help others.
Update: You have a lot of money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not interfere in other people's relationships.
Update: You think one of them is being abused by the other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not interfere in other people's relationships.
Update: They have a good relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not interfere in other people's relationships.
Update: You know other people who do drugs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not interfere in other people's relationships.
Update: You're not especially close to anyone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not interfere in other people's relationships.
Update: It could directly affect your family negatively.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not interfere in other people's relationships.
Update: You don't know them personally.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not interfere in other people's relationships.
Update: It is to the benefit of the other people
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not interfere in other people's relationships.
Update: They will be harmed by you interfering
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not interfere in other people's relationships.
Update: someone is going to get hurt.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not interfere in other people's relationships.
Update: you don't want them interfering in yours.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell others what they should do.
Update: They are your child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell others what they should do.
Update: They are your superior at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell others what they should do.
Update: you are in a position of authority over them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell others what they should do.
Update: you have no authority over them.
Update type: strengthener