tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: You should accept your step-children as family.
Update: they are adults and don't want anything to do with you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should accept your step-children as family.
Update: they are going to live in the same house as you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cheat on others.
Update: Your relationship allows for cheating.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cheat on others.
Update: You're in a monogamous marriage.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cheat on others.
Update: You want to have a long relationship with someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cheat on others.
Update: You caught them in bed with your sister.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cheat on others.
Update: Their previous relationship was very abusive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cheat on others.
Update: The person is okay with it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cheat on others.
Update: You want to build trust with people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cheat on others.
Update: They cheated on you first
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cheat on others.
Update: Your partner loves you and is married to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not want to travel with family members.
Update: They paid for your plane ticket.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not want to travel with family members.
Update: You're flying to another country and your family members don't have a passport.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not want to travel with family members.
Update: They take forever to get ready for anything
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not want to travel with family members.
Update: You agreed to drive them somewhere.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not want to travel with family members.
Update: You're suffering from agoraphobia.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not want to travel with family members.
Update: It is your only way to get somewhere
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not want to travel with family members.
Update: They are all annoying
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not want to travel with family members.
Update: Your family members need you to look after them for health reasons on the trip.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not want to travel with family members.
Update: Your family members have abused you and you are not fond of them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to provide quality service to customers.
Update: You want them to give you good reviews.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to provide quality service to customers.
Update: the customers are drunk and are being unruly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to provide quality service to customers.
Update: they are repeat customers.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to provide quality service to customers.
Update: You're not getting paid.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to provide quality service to customers.
Update: You're getting paid well for it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to provide quality service to customers.
Update: They use profanity towards you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to provide quality service to customers.
Update: You want the customers to keep coming back
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to provide quality service to customers.
Update: Unless your customers are drug addicts.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to provide quality service to customers.
Update: Especially if you want to stay in business.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell your partner what to do.
Update: They are about to be hit by a car.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell your partner what to do.
Update: You don't want to be controlling.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell your partner what to do.
Update: it is for their safety.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell your partner what to do.
Update: you are trying to control them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell your partner what to do.
Update: your partner is asking for your advice
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell your partner what to do.
Update: what you're telling them to do makes them uncomfortable
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell your partner what to do.
Update: They like to be submissive during sex.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell your partner what to do.
Update: They are taking an exam.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell your partner what to do.
Update: They are about to do something that will truly harm them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell your partner what to do.
Update: You have mutual trust and respect
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be rude to a family members significant other.
Update: their significant other is really mean to your family member
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be rude to a family members significant other.
Update: they did nothing to deserve someone being rude to them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be rude to a family members significant other.
Update: They have disrespected your parents.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be rude to a family members significant other.
Update: They are new to the family and you are just in a bad mood.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be rude to a family members significant other.
Update: Unless you know they are taking advantage of them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be rude to a family members significant other.
Update: Especially if they seem to make each other happy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be rude to a family members significant other.
Update: they are rude to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be rude to a family members significant other.
Update: they are kind to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be rude to a family members significant other.
Update: Your family member is being abused by their significant other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to be rude to a family members significant other.
Update: You respect your family member's right to date whomever they please.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to get back at someone.
Update: They are your closest cousin.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to get back at someone.
Update: They punched you in the face and you lost a tooth.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to get back at someone.
Update: what they did to you was accidental
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to get back at someone.
Update: they did something really mean to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to get back at someone.
Update: It requires too much effort.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to get back at someone.
Update: Your family's honor is involved.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to get back at someone.
Update: The person was always kind to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to get back at someone.
Update: The person stole something from you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to get back at someone.
Update: revenge isn't your cup of tea.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to get back at someone.
Update: you have revenge fantasies.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your girlfriend is expected to get mad at you, if you tell her you have a crush on someone else.
Update: She understands nothing will happen with the other girl
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your girlfriend is expected to get mad at you, if you tell her you have a crush on someone else.
Update: You want to maintain trust in the relationship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your girlfriend is expected to get mad at you, if you tell her you have a crush on someone else.
Update: you have an open relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your girlfriend is expected to get mad at you, if you tell her you have a crush on someone else.
Update: you are in a monogamous relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your girlfriend is expected to get mad at you, if you tell her you have a crush on someone else.
Update: She also never liked you that much
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your girlfriend is expected to get mad at you, if you tell her you have a crush on someone else.
Update: She loved you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your girlfriend is expected to get mad at you, if you tell her you have a crush on someone else.
Update: That crush is for an unobtainable celebrity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your girlfriend is expected to get mad at you, if you tell her you have a crush on someone else.
Update: The crush is on her sister.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your girlfriend is expected to get mad at you, if you tell her you have a crush on someone else.
Update: Your girlfriend was planning on breaking up with you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your girlfriend is expected to get mad at you, if you tell her you have a crush on someone else.
Update: Your crush is on your girlfriend's best friend
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to interfere with a co workers work performance.
Update: The performance is a detriment to the company.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to interfere with a co workers work performance.
Update: The performance is helping other's illness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to interfere with a co workers work performance.
Update: The coworker is working at the expense of others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to interfere with a co workers work performance.
Update: The coworker is reasonably working.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to interfere with a co workers work performance.
Update: It jeopardizes the company and its employees.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to interfere with a co workers work performance.
Update: You work closely together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to interfere with a co workers work performance.
Update: They asked you to help
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to interfere with a co workers work performance.
Update: You are trying to make yourself look better in a stacked ranking
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to interfere with a co workers work performance.
Update: The coworker is in another department.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to cut off someone who is mentally ill.
Update: It is your own mother with dementia.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to cut off someone who is mentally ill.
Update: The person has had violent outbursts.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to cut off someone who is mentally ill.
Update: you are being paid to be their caretaker.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to cut off someone who is mentally ill.
Update: they have become violent around you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to cut off someone who is mentally ill.
Update: They are your child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to cut off someone who is mentally ill.
Update: You get them professional help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to cut off someone who is mentally ill.
Update: they are your young child
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to cut off someone who is mentally ill.
Update: they're causing an overbearing financial strain on you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something that makes someone else want to go away from you.
Update: You don't know them and don't know how to talk to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something that makes someone else want to go away from you.
Update: You work together and you are a new employee.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something that makes someone else want to go away from you.
Update: They have committed a crime against you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something that makes someone else want to go away from you.
Update: They are your employee at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something that makes someone else want to go away from you.
Update: It is for their benefit.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something that makes someone else want to go away from you.
Update: You don't know the other person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something that makes someone else want to go away from you.
Update: you are in danger and trying to get someone away from you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something that makes someone else want to go away from you.
Update: you are doing it on purpose.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something that makes someone else want to go away from you.
Update: that person is doing stuff to intentionally annoy you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do something that makes someone else want to go away from you.
Update: that person is trying to help you with something
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't change the locks on something that you share with someone else.
Update: They've been evicted from the home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't change the locks on something that you share with someone else.
Update: You share belongings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't change the locks on something that you share with someone else.
Update: you want to hide something from them temporarily
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't change the locks on something that you share with someone else.
Update: you both have a right to access the item
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't change the locks on something that you share with someone else.
Update: that person agrees to the lock change.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't change the locks on something that you share with someone else.
Update: the other person doesn't have a key to the new lock.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't change the locks on something that you share with someone else.
Update: They have asked you to make them a key.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't change the locks on something that you share with someone else.
Update: They are still living with you and don't have an extra key.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't change the locks on something that you share with someone else.
Update: they have been stealing from your joint holdings.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't change the locks on something that you share with someone else.
Update: they have the same rights to access it as you do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Communication with your academic leaders is important.
Update: Unless they give you bad advice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Communication with your academic leaders is important.
Update: Especially if they give you good advice.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Communication with your academic leaders is important.
Update: it is in the middle of a scheduled exam time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Communication with your academic leaders is important.
Update: you are having a hard time understanding the material.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Communication with your academic leaders is important.
Update: You really understand the course, the classes are huge and other students need their help much more than you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Communication with your academic leaders is important.
Update: You are floundering and need explanations about the class.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Communication with your academic leaders is important.
Update: You graduated from school years ago.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Communication with your academic leaders is important.
Update: You're the dean of a school.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Communication with your academic leaders is important.
Update: They are sabotaging your work
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Communication with your academic leaders is important.
Update: They are advising your PhD dissertation
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to want to live with their loved ones.
Update: Their loved ones live in an assisted living facility.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to want to live with their loved ones.
Update: Their loved ones live in a beautiful home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to want to live with their loved ones.
Update: Their loved one is mentally ill and needs professional care.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to want to live with their loved ones.
Update: They are married with children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to want to live with their loved ones.
Update: They are adults trying to live with their parents.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to want to live with their loved ones.
Update: They are kids who live with their parents.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to want to live with their loved ones.
Update: Their loved ones smell from improper washing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to want to live with their loved ones.
Update: They are sick and dying.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to want to live with their loved ones.
Update: They get married to other people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to want to live with their loved ones.
Update: They're your children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to share with others.
Update: others take advantage of your sharing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to share with others.
Update: care about other people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to share with others.
Update: You're sharing drugs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to share with others.
Update: You're giving to charity.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to share with others.
Update: Others are taking advantage of you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to share with others.
Update: They also share with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to share with others.
Update: You're sick with flu.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to share with others.
Update: You have more than you too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to share with others.
Update: Unless you're sharing the flu.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to share with others.
Update: Especially if they are in need.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to ask someone to return a gift back to you
Update: You are replacing it with a newer one that they would rather have
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to ask someone to return a gift back to you
Update: It was a Christmas present
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to ask someone to return a gift back to you
Update: You accidentally gave the gift to the wrong person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to ask someone to return a gift back to you
Update: It is their birthday.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to ask someone to return a gift back to you
Update: You accidentally gave them the wrong item
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to ask someone to return a gift back to you
Update: You gave the gift several years ago
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to ask someone to return a gift back to you
Update: they expressed their dissatisfaction with it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to ask someone to return a gift back to you
Update: it is a monetary gift
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad to ask someone to return a gift back to you
Update: you switched up the gifts and gave theirs to the wrong person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad to ask someone to return a gift back to you
Update: you decided that they didnt deserve it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: a person should never manipulate another person.
Update: it is to get a criminal to confess to a crime.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: a person should never manipulate another person.
Update: they don't want to be manipulated by another person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: a person should never manipulate another person.
Update: they are a criminal and you are a cop interviewing them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: a person should never manipulate another person.
Update: you want to stay on their good side.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: a person should never manipulate another person.
Update: They other manipulates them first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: a person should never manipulate another person.
Update: They love each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: a person should never manipulate another person.
Update: they are trying to help someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: a person should never manipulate another person.
Update: they are trying to build trust.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: a person should never manipulate another person.
Update: They're trying to get someone to confess to a crime that occurred.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: a person should never manipulate another person.
Update: They're trying to marry the person they're manipulating.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let the little things come between you and someone you care about.
Update: You have bigger problems.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let the little things come between you and someone you care about.
Update: You want to stay close with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let the little things come between you and someone you care about.
Update: The little things are so annoying to you that they have become much bigger over time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let the little things come between you and someone you care about.
Update: You are truly in love with the person in most other ways and can adjust to the little things.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let the little things come between you and someone you care about.
Update: the little things all add up to something big.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let the little things come between you and someone you care about.
Update: you are just having an off day.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let the little things come between you and someone you care about.
Update: You have told them for many decades not to do those things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let the little things come between you and someone you care about.
Update: They are your young school age children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let the little things come between you and someone you care about.
Update: The other person is very stubborn.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let the little things come between you and someone you care about.
Update: The issues are very trivial and can easily be forgotten.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's lazy to not clean up after yourself.
Update: You are at a restaurant
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's lazy to not clean up after yourself.
Update: You have a household with a lot people and things moving through it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's lazy to not clean up after yourself.
Update: You are physically disabled.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's lazy to not clean up after yourself.
Update: You live with roommates.
Update type: strengthener