tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: Ending a relationship is hurtful.
Update: unless you no longer have strong feeling for them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Ending a relationship is hurtful.
Update: you don't understand why the relationship is ending.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Ending a relationship is hurtful.
Update: You are mutually going back to being friends instead.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Ending a relationship is hurtful.
Update: You end it over a text message with no reason.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore your partner if you need some space.
Update: You don't communicate to your partner that you need time alone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore your partner if you need some space.
Update: Your partner did something upsetting.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore your partner if you need some space.
Update: They think you are not safe.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore your partner if you need some space.
Update: They are overbearing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore your partner if you need some space.
Update: Your partner is feeling amorous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore your partner if you need some space.
Update: Your partner is being aggressive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore your partner if you need some space.
Update: It upsets them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore your partner if you need some space.
Update: They cheated on you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore your partner if you need some space.
Update: you haven't told them you need some space.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore your partner if you need some space.
Update: you have talked this over with them and they understand.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One is expected to help their family, not pass their problems on to others.
Update: Their family wants to help them with their problems.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One is expected to help their family, not pass their problems on to others.
Update: Their family is poor or experiencing crisis.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One is expected to help their family, not pass their problems on to others.
Update: they are asking others for help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One is expected to help their family, not pass their problems on to others.
Update: their problems are embarrassing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One is expected to help their family, not pass their problems on to others.
Update: They don't have the means to help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One is expected to help their family, not pass their problems on to others.
Update: They can easily help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One is expected to help their family, not pass their problems on to others.
Update: Your family has never helped you with your problems in the past
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One is expected to help their family, not pass their problems on to others.
Update: You are passing on the problems just because you are lazy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One is expected to help their family, not pass their problems on to others.
Update: Their family shunned them for religious reasons.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One is expected to help their family, not pass their problems on to others.
Update: They live many miles away from their nearest neighbor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to hang out with your friend's partner when you want to hang out with just them.
Update: You invited them both.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to hang out with your friend's partner when you want to hang out with just them.
Update: You haven't seen your friend in a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to hang out with your friend's partner when you want to hang out with just them.
Update: You have been invited to go with them on a trip.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to hang out with your friend's partner when you want to hang out with just them.
Update: They never spend time apart from their partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to hang out with your friend's partner when you want to hang out with just them.
Update: they want to do something that is platonic and doesn't endanger their relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to hang out with your friend's partner when you want to hang out with just them.
Update: you suspect that your friend's partner wants to cheat on your friend with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to hang out with your friend's partner when you want to hang out with just them.
Update: You showed up to your partner's friend's house.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to hang out with your friend's partner when you want to hang out with just them.
Update: Your partner's friend showed up unannounced.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to hang out with your friend's partner when you want to hang out with just them.
Update: You are creating ill will.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to hang out with your friend's partner when you want to hang out with just them.
Update: Everyone agrees you are expressing your free will.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your coworkers and help them succeed.
Update: They are stealing from the company.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your coworkers and help them succeed.
Update: Their work will benefit you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your coworkers and help them succeed.
Update: that would involve you losing your job
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your coworkers and help them succeed.
Update: you work on a team that is rewarded equally
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your coworkers and help them succeed.
Update: You're in direct competition with them for a big job promotion.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your coworkers and help them succeed.
Update: They've always been helpful with your career.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your coworkers and help them succeed.
Update: they are trying to steal your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your coworkers and help them succeed.
Update: they will take you along with them up the success ladder.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should support your coworkers and help them succeed.
Update: you are both trying for the same promotion.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should support your coworkers and help them succeed.
Update: you are a trainer and it is your job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to pay rent on time.
Update: Your landlord is relaxed about payment dates.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to pay rent on time.
Update: Your landlord is very stern about payment dates/
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to pay rent on time.
Update: unless you are moving out right away.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to pay rent on time.
Update: you want to stay in the place you rented.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to pay rent on time.
Update: Paying rent on time means your children won't have food to eat.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to pay rent on time.
Update: You want to avoid late fees.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to pay rent on time.
Update: You have a cool landlord that doesn’t care
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to pay rent on time.
Update: You don’t want to get kicked out
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to pay rent on time.
Update: Your landlord has given you a two week extension.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to pay rent on time.
Update: You have been threatened to be evicted.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable for your partner to be upset if you tell the to change their diet.
Update: they ask for your advice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable for your partner to be upset if you tell the to change their diet.
Update: they are a food addict.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable for your partner to be upset if you tell the to change their diet.
Update: They are really overweight.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable for your partner to be upset if you tell the to change their diet.
Update: They are already losing weight.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable for your partner to be upset if you tell the to change their diet.
Update: You are telling them that because you are worried about their health
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable for your partner to be upset if you tell the to change their diet.
Update: They are following diet recommended by the doctor
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable for your partner to be upset if you tell the to change their diet.
Update: They are a vegan and you want them to eat meat.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable for your partner to be upset if you tell the to change their diet.
Update: They eat cupcakes every day.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable for your partner to be upset if you tell the to change their diet.
Update: They have health issues
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable for your partner to be upset if you tell the to change their diet.
Update: They aren’t even overweight
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always give family a chance to change.
Update: They killed someone you love.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always give family a chance to change.
Update: They made an honest mistake.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always give family a chance to change.
Update: They ruined all chances before
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always give family a chance to change.
Update: This is their first mistake
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always give family a chance to change.
Update: They refuse to seek help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always give family a chance to change.
Update: They are seeking counseling for their behavior.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always give family a chance to change.
Update: The family belongs to the Mafia.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always give family a chance to change.
Update: They have a newborn baby in the home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always give family a chance to change.
Update: You have already given them many chances in the past.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always give family a chance to change.
Update: An addicted family member is attending rehab.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You aren't expected to stick around someone with severe mental issues.
Update: It's your spouse with the issues
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You aren't expected to stick around someone with severe mental issues.
Update: They are violent
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You aren't expected to stick around someone with severe mental issues.
Update: You are their therapist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You aren't expected to stick around someone with severe mental issues.
Update: You are a stranger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You aren't expected to stick around someone with severe mental issues.
Update: You work in a psychiatric ward.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You aren't expected to stick around someone with severe mental issues.
Update: They are verbally abusing you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You aren't expected to stick around someone with severe mental issues.
Update: You are a psychologist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You aren't expected to stick around someone with severe mental issues.
Update: You have mental illness issues of your own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You aren't expected to stick around someone with severe mental issues.
Update: You're that person's therapist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You aren't expected to stick around someone with severe mental issues.
Update: That person was just a coworker of yours.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to take punishment seriously.
Update: They are acting in a play.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to take punishment seriously.
Update: They received bad grades in school.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to take punishment seriously.
Update: they were not guilty of the crime to begin with.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to take punishment seriously.
Update: they harmed another person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to take punishment seriously.
Update: The punishment was intentionally lenient because of extenuating circumstances.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to take punishment seriously.
Update: The punishment was meant to be harsh because of aggravating circumstances.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to take punishment seriously.
Update: The punishment is a kinky kind.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to take punishment seriously.
Update: The punishment is by the courts.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to take punishment seriously.
Update: it's not specific to the offense.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to take punishment seriously.
Update: it will keep you out of trouble later.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should share in expenses with others.
Update: You are out of work and are paying your share in labor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should share in expenses with others.
Update: YOu promised to cover half the bills this month.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should share in expenses with others.
Update: you are not responsible for any of the bills.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should share in expenses with others.
Update: you are responsible for a portion of the bills.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should share in expenses with others.
Update: You don’t have enough money
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should share in expenses with others.
Update: You share an apartment
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should share in expenses with others.
Update: you are poor and have no money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should share in expenses with others.
Update: you are wealthy and caused some of the expenses.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should share in expenses with others.
Update: you have no money
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should share in expenses with others.
Update: you have tons of money
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get your own place if you have the means to support yourself
Update: You are trying to save money for something else
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get your own place if you have the means to support yourself
Update: You are tired of living with your parents
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get your own place if you have the means to support yourself
Update: Your parents are physically disabled and need you to help with some tasks.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get your own place if you have the means to support yourself
Update: You have several kids of your own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get your own place if you have the means to support yourself
Update: you'd be abandoning your children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get your own place if you have the means to support yourself
Update: you have no obligations.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get your own place if you have the means to support yourself
Update: You're supposed to be caring for a sick loved one at their home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get your own place if you have the means to support yourself
Update: You don't get along with your family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get your own place if you have the means to support yourself
Update: You are still in middle school.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get your own place if you have the means to support yourself
Update: You are 35 and still live with your parents.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not speak to strangers.
Update: you need to ask for directions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not speak to strangers.
Update: you're in a hurry.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not speak to strangers.
Update: they are asking you for directions
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not speak to strangers.
Update: they seem like dangerous people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not speak to strangers.
Update: Someone is asking you for directions or help and is in need and seems harmless.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not speak to strangers.
Update: They look like they could hurt you or are acting belligerent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not speak to strangers.
Update: doing so is part of your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not speak to strangers.
Update: it makes you uncomfortable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not speak to strangers.
Update: You're supposed to be handing out fl iers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not speak to strangers.
Update: You're on a subway.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your ex to care about you.
Update: They left you for someone else.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your ex to care about you.
Update: you had a pretty harsh separation
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your ex to care about you.
Update: you did not separate on bad terms
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your ex to care about you.
Update: You have remained friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your ex to care about you.
Update: It was a bad breakup.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your ex to care about you.
Update: You have children together and need to maintain a co-parent relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your ex to care about you.
Update: You broke up many years ago and are seeing someone new.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your ex to care about you.
Update: you two were once close
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't expect your ex to care about you.
Update: you don't like each other
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to play games sometimes.
Update: you are at church and are supposed to be reverant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to play games sometimes.
Update: you are in elementary school and need to get the wiggles out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to play games sometimes.
Update: You are an air traffic controller and you are supposed to be on the job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to play games sometimes.
Update: You are a child who has been studying too much.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to play games sometimes.
Update: You are playing computer games at work when the boss isn't looking.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to play games sometimes.
Update: You play board games at home with your family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to play games sometimes.
Update: you are in a rigorous study program with no free time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to play games sometimes.
Update: games are relaxing and you are stressed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to play games sometimes.
Update: you are at work and there is a lot to do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to play games sometimes.
Update: you are on vacation and trying to have fun.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to move on from bad relationships by having nothing further to do with the person.
Update: You have a child in common with your ex and have to see them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to move on from bad relationships by having nothing further to do with the person.
Update: You have a restraining order against the person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to move on from bad relationships by having nothing further to do with the person.
Update: you share joint custody of the children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to move on from bad relationships by having nothing further to do with the person.
Update: you want to focus on a new relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to move on from bad relationships by having nothing further to do with the person.
Update: You think you can change them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to move on from bad relationships by having nothing further to do with the person.
Update: You are emotionally abused
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to move on from bad relationships by having nothing further to do with the person.
Update: you have children with the other person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to move on from bad relationships by having nothing further to do with the person.
Update: you want to work on yourself
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to move on from bad relationships by having nothing further to do with the person.
Update: You haven't had closure yet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to move on from bad relationships by having nothing further to do with the person.
Update: It was a violent relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to eat food that is not yours.
Update: Someone is handing out free samples.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to eat food that is not yours.
Update: The other person only has one slice of pizza.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to eat food that is not yours.
Update: it was offered to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to eat food that is not yours.
Update: you know someone is saving it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to eat food that is not yours.
Update: you were explicitly told it was okay for you to eat it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to eat food that is not yours.
Update: you've been explicitly warned not to eat food that wasn't yours.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to eat food that is not yours.
Update: It is all the food that they have and they cannot afford to get more.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to eat food that is not yours.
Update: They said you could have it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to eat food that is not yours.
Update: You didn’t pay for it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to exclude people in a group chat.
Update: They have informed you that they hate being invited to group chats.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to exclude people in a group chat.
Update: You exclude them for the sole purpose of hurting their feelings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to exclude people in a group chat.
Update: It is for a private club.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to exclude people in a group chat.
Update: It is open to all.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to exclude people in a group chat.
Update: You are not friends with them or they do not like you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to exclude people in a group chat.
Update: They are just trying to get to know you better.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to exclude people in a group chat.
Update: Unless you are planning a surprise party.
Update type: weakener