tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: You shouldn't masturbate to pictures of people you know.
Update: they are family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't masturbate to pictures of people you know.
Update: The pictures are of your partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't masturbate to pictures of people you know.
Update: They are related to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep in touch with family.
Update: They create a toxic environment to you and yours.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep in touch with family.
Update: They are the only family you have left.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep in touch with family.
Update: They disowned you for marrying a black person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep in touch with family.
Update: They've supported you through everything
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep in touch with family.
Update: They haven't spoken to you in 10 years.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep in touch with family.
Update: One of them is terminally ill.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep in touch with family.
Update: You come from a toxic family.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep in touch with family.
Update: Family is important to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should keep in touch with family.
Update: Your family has hurt you and caused considerable damage to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should keep in touch with family.
Update: Your family has been good to you and contacts you a lot.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being treated with respect from people is expected.
Update: you already disrespected them before this
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being treated with respect from people is expected.
Update: you are a military vet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being treated with respect from people is expected.
Update: You give no one respect yourself
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being treated with respect from people is expected.
Update: You are always respectful to others
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being treated with respect from people is expected.
Update: You have been horrible to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being treated with respect from people is expected.
Update: You have been there for them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being treated with respect from people is expected.
Update: You are not treating them with respect in return.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being treated with respect from people is expected.
Update: They are your own children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being treated with respect from people is expected.
Update: You are in prison.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being treated with respect from people is expected.
Update: You are in church.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to expect someone else to pay your way.
Update: You're still a child and it's your parents thad will pay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to expect someone else to pay your way.
Update: You're with a group of co-workers going to have lunch.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to expect someone else to pay your way.
Update: They just won the lottery and owe you for past deeds.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to expect someone else to pay your way.
Update: You disparaged their spouse at a family party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to expect someone else to pay your way.
Update: They offered to pay for you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to expect someone else to pay your way.
Update: You know that they are struggling financially.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to expect someone else to pay your way.
Update: That person owes you an outstanding debt.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to expect someone else to pay your way.
Update: You have no original ideas of your own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to expect someone else to pay your way.
Update: You paid for them last time
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to expect someone else to pay your way.
Update: You are the richer one
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not joke around with colleagues.
Update: You have known your coworkers for a long time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not joke around with colleagues.
Update: You are new in the office.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not joke around with colleagues.
Update: You are at a party and having fun.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not joke around with colleagues.
Update: You're at work and are not on break.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not joke around with colleagues.
Update: Your colleagues like to joke around as well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not joke around with colleagues.
Update: Your jokes are sometimes inappropriate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not joke around with colleagues.
Update: They have made it clear they enjoy it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not joke around with colleagues.
Update: You do not know them or their sense of humor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not joke around with colleagues.
Update: You have been together for a long time and know that they won't take something the wrong way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not joke around with colleagues.
Update: You're in a serious, straight-laced profession like the medical or legal fields.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always help out people that are depressed.
Update: You don't have enough empathy and understanding.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always help out people that are depressed.
Update: You have experience in helping depressed people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always help out people that are depressed.
Update: They need some alone time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always help out people that are depressed.
Update: You are a therapist.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always help out people that are depressed.
Update: the people are unwilling to accept help and become violent when you try to help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always help out people that are depressed.
Update: you are a caring and compassionate person who wants to help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always help out people that are depressed.
Update: The person who is depressed is taking their feelings out on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always help out people that are depressed.
Update: you're a mental health counselor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always help out people that are depressed.
Update: Their mental health practitioner told you not to do so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always help out people that are depressed.
Update: They've been threatening to harm themselves or others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people return belongings when a relationship ends.
Update: The other person has told you to keep them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people return belongings when a relationship ends.
Update: The other person has requested that you return them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people return belongings when a relationship ends.
Update: The belongings were gifts.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people return belongings when a relationship ends.
Update: You live in California and it's an engagement ring.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people return belongings when a relationship ends.
Update: The belongings are something trivial, like a toothbrush.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people return belongings when a relationship ends.
Update: The belongings are expensive and heavily used, like a laptop.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people return belongings when a relationship ends.
Update: One of the people was physically abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people return belongings when a relationship ends.
Update: The items have significant sentimental value.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people return belongings when a relationship ends.
Update: You want to start over with everything new.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people return belongings when a relationship ends.
Update: You want the home uncluttered for your next significant other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Friends are expected to look out for each other.
Update: One of the friends starts doing dangerous and illegal things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Friends are expected to look out for each other.
Update: They're alone together in a strange city.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Friends are expected to look out for each other.
Update: They are in a fight with each other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Friends are expected to look out for each other.
Update: Something serious is happening, like someone is broke.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Friends are expected to look out for each other.
Update: One friend acted in an unkind way to the other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Friends are expected to look out for each other.
Update: Both friends have been dedicated to the relationship for years.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Friends are expected to look out for each other.
Update: They are in prison and are not able to
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Friends are expected to look out for each other.
Update: They have previously looked out for you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Friends are expected to look out for each other.
Update: They are not good friends and one of them is thinking of dropping the friendship altogether.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Friends are expected to look out for each other.
Update: They want to grow their friendship and become closer.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cut off contact with your parents.
Update: They have been abusive to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cut off contact with your parents.
Update: They are supporting you financially.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cut off contact with your parents.
Update: They never supported  and care for you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cut off contact with your parents.
Update: They need your support and help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cut off contact with your parents.
Update: they are abusive to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cut off contact with your parents.
Update: they've always supported you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cut off contact with your parents.
Update: They are criminals trying to take advantage of your relationship with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cut off contact with your parents.
Update: It is over something petty.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cut off contact with your parents.
Update: they are abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to cut off contact with your parents.
Update: they are dealing with a disease.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not take responsibility for someone else's mistakes.
Update: The mistakes were made by your own young child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not take responsibility for someone else's mistakes.
Update: The mistakes were made by an adult friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not take responsibility for someone else's mistakes.
Update: You're their boss and you told them how to do something incorrectly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not take responsibility for someone else's mistakes.
Update: They knew how to do something correctly but, they didn't care.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not take responsibility for someone else's mistakes.
Update: You gave them the advice that led to the mistake.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not take responsibility for someone else's mistakes.
Update: You had nothing to do with it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not take responsibility for someone else's mistakes.
Update: You are someone's supervisor or direct manager.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not take responsibility for someone else's mistakes.
Update: You are their subordinate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not take responsibility for someone else's mistakes.
Update: you advised the mistake.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to not take responsibility for someone else's mistakes.
Update: they are trying to pin it on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is kind to donate to charity.
Update: The charity is corrupt.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is kind to donate to charity.
Update: You have plenty of money left over.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is kind to donate to charity.
Update: You are just donating to get a good public image.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is kind to donate to charity.
Update: You are donating out of the kindness of your heart.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is kind to donate to charity.
Update: the charity is a scam charity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is kind to donate to charity.
Update: it is going to help kids get the treatment they need.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is kind to donate to charity.
Update: You're a billionaire and could solve climate change.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is kind to donate to charity.
Update: You don't have much to spare in the first place.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is kind to donate to charity.
Update: You donate to a charity that is known to be wasteful.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is kind to donate to charity.
Update: The charity you donate to helps a lot of people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to everyone.
Update: Someone is hostile and violent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to everyone.
Update: They care and support you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to everyone.
Update: Some people are very rude to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to everyone.
Update: You are a priest.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to everyone.
Update: You live in a country with many spies that could take advantage of you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to everyone.
Update: Under the care of a team of doctors.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to everyone.
Update: You are dealing with Nazis.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to everyone.
Update: You work in customer service.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to everyone.
Update: Someone is mean to you first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to everyone.
Update: Someone is nice to you first.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to tattle on someone when they are in danger or have committed a crime.
Update: they simply took home a work pen.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to tattle on someone when they are in danger or have committed a crime.
Update: It will affect others negatively.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to tattle on someone when they are in danger or have committed a crime.
Update: they have already been punished.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to tattle on someone when they are in danger or have committed a crime.
Update: they intend to hurt others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to tattle on someone when they are in danger or have committed a crime.
Update: They haven't committed a bad crime.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to tattle on someone when they are in danger or have committed a crime.
Update: They have killed someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to tattle on someone when they are in danger or have committed a crime.
Update: The authorities will only make the problem worse.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to tattle on someone when they are in danger or have committed a crime.
Update: You're afraid that person is about to seriously hurt someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to tattle on someone when they are in danger or have committed a crime.
Update: Lives are at risk
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to be more independent.
Update: you are not an adult.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to be more independent.
Update: you are getting ready for college.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to be more independent.
Update: Your independence comes at the expense of your loved ones (you steal from them).
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to be more independent.
Update: You've always been dependent on others to survive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to be more independent.
Update: You're facing life in prison.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to be more independent.
Update: You're getting your driver's license for the first time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to be more independent.
Update: Your idea of independence involves hurting other people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to be more independent.
Update: You have had to rely on someone for a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want to be more independent.
Update: You have a job
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Getting drunk is frowned upon.
Update: You can regulate your behavior while drunk.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Getting drunk is frowned upon.
Update: You can't control yourself when you get drunk.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Getting drunk is frowned upon.
Update: You're at Oktoberfest and having a great time with friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Getting drunk is frowned upon.
Update: You act out violently when drunk and hurt others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Getting drunk is frowned upon.
Update: You are at a bar or a club.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Getting drunk is frowned upon.
Update: You are at a children's birthday party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Getting drunk is frowned upon.
Update: You're at an open bar wedding reception.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Getting drunk is frowned upon.
Update: You have a past of alcohol abuse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Getting drunk is frowned upon.
Update: You're at a party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Getting drunk is frowned upon.
Update: You're at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to ruin someone's birthday.
Update: You have to deliver time-sensitive bad news.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to ruin someone's birthday.
Update: You could easily wait to give them bad news.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to ruin someone's birthday.
Update: they are your child
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to ruin someone's birthday.
Update: You ruined the birthday by accident.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to ruin someone's birthday.
Update: The person who had a birthday was a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to ruin someone's birthday.
Update: Unless it saves their life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to ruin someone's birthday.
Update: You're doing it for a selfish reason.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being angry at family members for not helping you financially with college is OK.
Update: You turned down the help they offered.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being angry at family members for not helping you financially with college is OK.
Update: Your family promised to help you pay for school.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being angry at family members for not helping you financially with college is OK.
Update: They don't have enough money to help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being angry at family members for not helping you financially with college is OK.
Update: They told you before they would help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being angry at family members for not helping you financially with college is OK.
Update: they are poor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being angry at family members for not helping you financially with college is OK.
Update: they are rich.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being angry at family members for not helping you financially with college is OK.
Update: They paid for your car and threw you a lavish birthday.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being angry at family members for not helping you financially with college is OK.
Update: They work at the same college and receive reduced rates.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being angry at family members for not helping you financially with college is OK.
Update: Your family has no money
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being angry at family members for not helping you financially with college is OK.
Update: Your siblings had their college paid for
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Gender norms are a thing of the past.
Update: We elect someone who has Orwellian impact on society.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Gender norms are a thing of the past.
Update: We elect someone who truly believes in equality.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Gender norms are a thing of the past.
Update: You are playing a role in a historical drama.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Gender norms are a thing of the past.
Update: Someone's civil rights are on the line.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Gender norms are a thing of the past.
Update: You're living in the American south.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Gender norms are a thing of the past.
Update: You're living in San Francisco.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Gender norms are a thing of the past.
Update: You want to be a progressive person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let a roommate oversleep.
Update: They are really sick and need rest.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let a roommate oversleep.
Update: They need to be up at a certain time for their job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let a roommate oversleep.
Update: They are ill and need rest.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let a roommate oversleep.
Update: You both have an important appointment soon.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let a roommate oversleep.
Update: Your roommate was studying until the wee hours.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let a roommate oversleep.
Update: Your roommate has to take a test she was studying for.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let a roommate oversleep.
Update: They need the rest and it's a weekend.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let a roommate oversleep.
Update: They need to wake up and go to work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let a roommate oversleep.
Update: They told you not to bother them at all.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to let a roommate oversleep.
Update: You know they need to be up at a certain time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk to your ex-friend about private things.
Update: Unless they involve your friend in some way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk to your ex-friend about private things.
Update: You are dating her ex-boyfriend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk to your ex-friend about private things.
Update: They are also your licensed therapist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk to your ex-friend about private things.
Update: You signed a confidentiality agreement at your job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to talk to your ex-friend about private things.
Update: You need someone to confide in and have noone else.
Update type: weakener