tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is wrong to exclude a mentally disabled person from a game.
Update: The game is expected to be so frustrating as to truly discourage the disabled person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to exclude a mentally disabled person from a game.
Update: The game is quite fun so that the disabled person would really enjoy it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their families.
Update: Their family is abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their families.
Update: The family is attending a funeral together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their families.
Update: the family is abusive
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their families.
Update: the family is kind and loving
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their families.
Update: Their family is toxic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their families.
Update: The family is very supportive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their families.
Update: There family member have been very cruel to them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their families.
Update: They have been there for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their families.
Update: Their families have done things to them that are very hurtful.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their families.
Update: Their families have always been very good to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to buy food for others.
Update: You are motivated by ulterior motives
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to buy food for others.
Update: The people are homeless
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to buy food for others.
Update: They are allergic to the food.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to buy food for others.
Update: They have bought food for you in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to buy food for others.
Update: They have repeatedly asked you to stop doing it because they're on a diet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to buy food for others.
Update: you know they are struggling financially and would appreciate it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to buy food for others.
Update: You give meat to vegetarians
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to buy food for others.
Update: The recipient is homeless
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's nice to buy food for others.
Update: they are on a diet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's nice to buy food for others.
Update: it is their birthday.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to exclude people.
Update: The person did not want to be part of the group
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to exclude people.
Update: Deserve to belong in the conversation
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to exclude people.
Update: You are being quarantined.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to exclude people.
Update: You're having a birthday party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to exclude people.
Update: They have ruined parties in the past.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to exclude people.
Update: They are important to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to exclude people.
Update: People needed to earn their way in but didn't.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to exclude people.
Update: There is no good reason to exclude them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to exclude people.
Update: Those people are bigots.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to exclude people.
Update: They are from a marginalized group.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be spiteful.
Update: You really want to cause harm.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be spiteful.
Update: you are spiteful toward someone who has intentionally harmed you with no remorse.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be spiteful.
Update: you have been afforded great privilege in your life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be spiteful.
Update: You've been wronged by someone badly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be spiteful.
Update: You've had a relatively fortunate life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be spiteful.
Update: You are spiteful to an underhanded politician.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be spiteful.
Update: Being spiteful is hurting someone's feelings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be spiteful.
Update: the person really deserves it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to be spiteful.
Update: you are just doing so because you are jealous.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their communities.
Update: The people in the community are not nice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their communities.
Update: They just moved in and are trying to be apart of the community.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their communities.
Update: They are prisoners of war.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their communities.
Update: They live in a small town.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their communities.
Update: Their community is a haven for criminals.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their communities.
Update: The community helps people in need.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their communities.
Update: They are in prison.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their communities.
Update: They work in the public sector.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their communities.
Update: Those  communities are filled with racists.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to get along with their communities.
Update: They just moved into the neighborhood.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if someone gives you food that causes an allergic reaction.
Update: They didn't know about your allergy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if someone gives you food that causes an allergic reaction.
Update: They knew about your allergy and were careless.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if someone gives you food that causes an allergic reaction.
Update: You do not eat it and give it back.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if someone gives you food that causes an allergic reaction.
Update: They knew you are dangerously allergic to the food.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if someone gives you food that causes an allergic reaction.
Update: They did it by accident
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if someone gives you food that causes an allergic reaction.
Update: They could have asked you first if you have any allergies
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if someone gives you food that causes an allergic reaction.
Update: The person was a child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if someone gives you food that causes an allergic reaction.
Update: The person was a restaurant server.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if someone gives you food that causes an allergic reaction.
Update: They had no way of knowing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if someone gives you food that causes an allergic reaction.
Update: They knew you were allergic and did it anyway.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to forgive for minor transgressions.
Update: The person has been doing the same thing for years even though you've repeatedly asked them not to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to forgive for minor transgressions.
Update: The other person has forgiven you for doing similarly annoying things.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to forgive for minor transgressions.
Update: Those minor transgressions happen all of the time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to forgive for minor transgressions.
Update: The transgressions were unintentional.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to forgive for minor transgressions.
Update: it was done on purpose.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to forgive for minor transgressions.
Update: it was an accident.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to forgive for minor transgressions.
Update: The person has never apologized.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to forgive for minor transgressions.
Update: It's a toddler who doesn't know better.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to forgive for minor transgressions.
Update: The person says that they are going to do it again.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to forgive for minor transgressions.
Update: The child is young and is still learning right from wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is typical for families to argue about the same disagreements repeatedly.
Update: They aren't supportive of each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is typical for families to argue about the same disagreements repeatedly.
Update: It escalates into fights.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is typical for families to argue about the same disagreements repeatedly.
Update: It's a controversial topic.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is typical for families to argue about the same disagreements repeatedly.
Update: Families argue about today's local news items.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is typical for families to argue about the same disagreements repeatedly.
Update: Families have widely different political viewpoints.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is typical for families to argue about the same disagreements repeatedly.
Update: A comet is headed toward earth and there are new priorities.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is typical for families to argue about the same disagreements repeatedly.
Update: Half of the family are Democrats and the other half are Republicans.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is typical for families to argue about the same disagreements repeatedly.
Update: They put a lot of effort into finding a way to resolve their differences.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is typical for families to argue about the same disagreements repeatedly.
Update: No one in the family is willing to listen to the other side's claims.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not your responsibility to pay another person's debts.
Update: You co-signed on a loan for them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not your responsibility to pay another person's debts.
Update: The other person refuses to pay you back.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not your responsibility to pay another person's debts.
Update: Unless you co-signed on the loan.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not your responsibility to pay another person's debts.
Update: You didn't agree to the debt in the first place.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not your responsibility to pay another person's debts.
Update: It has been court ordered.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not your responsibility to pay another person's debts.
Update: They are capable of paying it back.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not your responsibility to pay another person's debts.
Update: They are joint accounts with you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not your responsibility to pay another person's debts.
Update: You don't know the person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not your responsibility to pay another person's debts.
Update: You're married and have a joint bank account.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not your responsibility to pay another person's debts.
Update: You've never met that person before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected when you make something you make enough for everyone.
Update: Guests show up at your house at dinnertime unannounced.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected when you make something you make enough for everyone.
Update: You are hosting a party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected when you make something you make enough for everyone.
Update: You dont have the money to make for others
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected when you make something you make enough for everyone.
Update: You want to satisfy everyone
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected when you make something you make enough for everyone.
Update: You are the only who likes what you're making.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected when you make something you make enough for everyone.
Update: It would require little additional effort to make enough for everyone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected when you make something you make enough for everyone.
Update: you were surprised by the number of people
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected when you make something you make enough for everyone.
Update: you promised ahead of time you would
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected when you make something you make enough for everyone.
Update: Some people are allergic to the ingredients.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected when you make something you make enough for everyone.
Update: It is a party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to tell someone to shut up if they have a condition that influences their behavior.
Update: You also have a condition that influences your behavior.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to tell someone to shut up if they have a condition that influences their behavior.
Update: The person is supposed to be on medication for his behavior, but can't afford the pills.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to tell someone to shut up if they have a condition that influences their behavior.
Update: they are causing a disturbance in a public place.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to tell someone to shut up if they have a condition that influences their behavior.
Update: they lack the ability to control the behavior.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to tell someone to shut up if they have a condition that influences their behavior.
Update: They need to shut up to avoid harm coming to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to tell someone to shut up if they have a condition that influences their behavior.
Update: No one else can hear them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to tell someone to shut up if they have a condition that influences their behavior.
Update: You don't know about the condition.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to tell someone to shut up if they have a condition that influences their behavior.
Update: You are related to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to tell someone to shut up if they have a condition that influences their behavior.
Update: You have politely asked for quiet many times.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to tell someone to shut up if they have a condition that influences their behavior.
Update: It is New Year's Eve.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask people to drive you somewhere on their day off.
Update: That person loves driving
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask people to drive you somewhere on their day off.
Update: That person is a taxi driver
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask people to drive you somewhere on their day off.
Update: You have no other options.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask people to drive you somewhere on their day off.
Update: You have your own car and can do it yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask people to drive you somewhere on their day off.
Update: You are taking them out to dinner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask people to drive you somewhere on their day off.
Update: They are sick and don't feel well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask people to drive you somewhere on their day off.
Update: They have offered and have no plans.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask people to drive you somewhere on their day off.
Update: The person has told you that they were going to rest all day.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask people to drive you somewhere on their day off.
Update: You've done similar favors for them in the past.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask people to drive you somewhere on their day off.
Update: You have money for an Uber or other modes of transport.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to discriminate against someone based on health issues.
Update: it is only to segregate the sick for quarantine to protect the masses.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to discriminate against someone based on health issues.
Update: they are sick through no fault of their own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to discriminate against someone based on health issues.
Update: They could get you sick.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to discriminate against someone based on health issues.
Update: They can't help their condition.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to discriminate against someone based on health issues.
Update: They are a member of more than one marginalized group.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to discriminate against someone based on health issues.
Update: You are trying to find the right care for them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to discriminate against someone based on health issues.
Update: It is something that they cannot help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to discriminate against someone based on health issues.
Update: the health issues make them incapable of doing the job
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: it is wrong to discriminate against someone based on health issues.
Update: the health issue is not relevant to the situation
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to learn how to cook new recipes.
Update: You have no idea how to cook and could cause harm.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to learn how to cook new recipes.
Update: You want to experience other cultures' culinary treats.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to learn how to cook new recipes.
Update: You prefer the cuisine you currently know.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to learn how to cook new recipes.
Update: You're looking for new things to eat.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to learn how to cook new recipes.
Update: The recipe contains an ingredient you are allergic to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to learn how to cook new recipes.
Update: The recipes are healthy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to learn how to cook new recipes.
Update: you are a hopelessly terrible cook
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to learn how to cook new recipes.
Update: you get bored easily with eating the same things
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to learn how to cook new recipes.
Update: You spend all of your money on cooking.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to learn how to cook new recipes.
Update: You have lots of extra food at home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to get help when needed.
Update: You have too much pride and would refuse it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to get help when needed.
Update: You are overwhelmed and on the verge of a nervous breakdown.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to get help when needed.
Update: the other person can't really afford to help
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to get help when needed.
Update: your need is life-threatening
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to get help when needed.
Update: You need to start doing things on your own.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to get help when needed.
Update: You are struggling and others have offered assistance.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to get help when needed.
Update: You are lazy and want someone else to do it for you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to get help when needed.
Update: You have tried different solutions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to get help when needed.
Update: The necessary help would result in bankruptcy
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to get help when needed.
Update: The necessary help is nearby and affordable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make someone leave their own party.
Update: they have hurt themself and need to go to the hospital.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make someone leave their own party.
Update: the party is at their house.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make someone leave their own party.
Update: They are sick and need to go to the hospital.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make someone leave their own party.
Update: They are turning two years old and having a great time opening presents.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make someone leave their own party.
Update: They were trying to fight one of the guests.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make someone leave their own party.
Update: The host was kind and friendly to everyone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make someone leave their own party.
Update: They are in danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make someone leave their own party.
Update: They have every right to be there.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make someone leave their own party.
Update: They are so drunk they are posing a safety issue to themselves and others
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make someone leave their own party.
Update: You're jealous they are getting tons of attention
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is cruel to hurt someone after they make themselves vulnerable to you
Update: Their vulnerability revealed a crime that took place.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is cruel to hurt someone after they make themselves vulnerable to you
Update: They have opened up about their childhood trauma.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is cruel to hurt someone after they make themselves vulnerable to you
Update: It was part of greater plan of revenge.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is cruel to hurt someone after they make themselves vulnerable to you
Update: You want a long and healthy relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is cruel to hurt someone after they make themselves vulnerable to you
Update: You want to end the relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is cruel to hurt someone after they make themselves vulnerable to you
Update: You are close to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is cruel to hurt someone after they make themselves vulnerable to you
Update: You can't avoid telling them something they don't want to hear that could save their life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is cruel to hurt someone after they make themselves vulnerable to you
Update: They trust you to be kind.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is cruel to hurt someone after they make themselves vulnerable to you
Update: They have done something to hurt you first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is cruel to hurt someone after they make themselves vulnerable to you
Update: You are married to them.
Update type: strengthener