tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's expected that people will want to celebrate on their birthday.
Update: The person is depressed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people will want to celebrate on their birthday.
Update: The person has lots of friends and family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Giving your friend the cold shoulder without explanation is mean.
Update: they have not apologized.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Giving your friend the cold shoulder without explanation is mean.
Update: they are going through a hard time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Giving your friend the cold shoulder without explanation is mean.
Update: your friend has done the same to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Giving your friend the cold shoulder without explanation is mean.
Update: your friend has done nothing wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Giving your friend the cold shoulder without explanation is mean.
Update: They spread vicious lies about you on purpose.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Giving your friend the cold shoulder without explanation is mean.
Update: They did nothing wrong to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Giving your friend the cold shoulder without explanation is mean.
Update: they have betrayed you in a way that can't be forgiven.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Giving your friend the cold shoulder without explanation is mean.
Update: they aren't at fault.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Giving your friend the cold shoulder without explanation is mean.
Update: unless they have deeply hurt your feelings.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Giving your friend the cold shoulder without explanation is mean.
Update: they don't understand your behavior.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners are expected discuss important life decisions like having a child.
Update: The partners only recently got together.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Partners are expected discuss important life decisions like having a child.
Update: The partners are considering becoming engaged.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners are expected discuss important life decisions like having a child.
Update: The relationship is toxic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Partners are expected discuss important life decisions like having a child.
Update: The relationship is trusting.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners are expected discuss important life decisions like having a child.
Update: they don't want their relationship to last very long.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Partners are expected discuss important life decisions like having a child.
Update: they want their relationship to last.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners are expected discuss important life decisions like having a child.
Update: they only just started dating recently
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Partners are expected discuss important life decisions like having a child.
Update: they are having unprotected sex
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Partners are expected discuss important life decisions like having a child.
Update: One partner is severely disabled and is incapable of making decisions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Partners are expected discuss important life decisions like having a child.
Update: One of you wants to make a major life decision right now.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be courteous to other people.
Update: The other people were harassing you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be courteous to other people.
Update: The other people are serving you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be courteous to other people.
Update: they are not courteous to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be courteous to other people.
Update: you wish to be treated well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be courteous to other people.
Update: The other people are cruel and violent towards you.e
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be courteous to other people.
Update: They treat you fairly and kindly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be courteous to other people.
Update: they are physically assaulting you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be courteous to other people.
Update: they are being courteous to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be courteous to other people.
Update: They push you over for no reason.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be courteous to other people.
Update: They look like they're having a rough day.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your housemate from a celebration.
Update: They are known to get overly intoxicated.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your housemate from a celebration.
Update: They keep talking about the celebration.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your housemate from a celebration.
Update: they hate your friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your housemate from a celebration.
Update: it is big and noisy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your housemate from a celebration.
Update: they have different beliefs
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your housemate from a celebration.
Update: they include you in theirs
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your housemate from a celebration.
Update: It is a private activity for family only.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your housemate from a celebration.
Update: It is at your house.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your housemate from a celebration.
Update: They are a druggie
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to exclude your housemate from a celebration.
Update: You are their best friend
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to remain friends with a former romantic partner.
Update: They always try to hook up with you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to remain friends with a former romantic partner.
Update: You are both single.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to remain friends with a former romantic partner.
Update: Your former romantic partner has a restraining order against you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to remain friends with a former romantic partner.
Update: You both have a child together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to remain friends with a former romantic partner.
Update: They hit you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to remain friends with a former romantic partner.
Update: You have kids with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to remain friends with a former romantic partner.
Update: they still have feelings for you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to remain friends with a former romantic partner.
Update: you have both moved on.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to remain friends with a former romantic partner.
Update: Your new partner doesn’t allow it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to remain friends with a former romantic partner.
Update: You know you can just be friends
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: the people are being crass and unpleasant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: they are politely addressing you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: They're strangers in a store.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: They're trying to get your attention.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: the people are trying to annoy you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: the other people are trying to help you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: It is a child having a temper tantrum.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: You work in customer service.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: they are yelling insults.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to ignore other people.
Update: they are talking to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: you are playing Monopoly Cheater's Edition.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: want the playing field to be even.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: You're trying to be a good person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: it is agreed upon ahead of time that it is okay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: it is against the rules.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: Your teacher is bad at their job
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: No one else needs to cheat to get a good grade
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Cheating is wrong.
Update: You could get expelled from the University for cheating on an exam.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stick your nose into your partner's family's life.
Update: They want to vent to you about their family problems.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stick your nose into your partner's family's life.
Update: They try to minimize contact with their family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stick your nose into your partner's family's life.
Update: You're married to your partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stick your nose into your partner's family's life.
Update: You're not married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stick your nose into your partner's family's life.
Update: It affects you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stick your nose into your partner's family's life.
Update: You don't get along
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stick your nose into your partner's family's life.
Update: their family is hurting your partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stick your nose into your partner's family's life.
Update: your partner is very close to their family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stick your nose into your partner's family's life.
Update: You see obvious abuse going on  and your partner can use some help distancing themselves from it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stick your nose into your partner's family's life.
Update: Their family life is warm and loving and they haven't asked you to.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be considerate of your neighbors.
Update: They're aggressive and paranoid.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be considerate of your neighbors.
Update: They're friendly and welcomed you to the neighborhood with cookies.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be considerate of your neighbors.
Update: They have moved out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be considerate of your neighbors.
Update: They are considerate of you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be considerate of your neighbors.
Update: Your neighbors throw eggs at your house
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be considerate of your neighbors.
Update: They are nice elderly people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be considerate of your neighbors.
Update: They are dealing heroin.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be considerate of your neighbors.
Update: they steal your lawnmower.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be considerate of your neighbors.
Update: you might ask them to watch your house while you are on vacation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is considerate to inform your friend in advance if you do not plan to attend their party.
Update: Your babysitter cancels at the last minute.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is considerate to inform your friend in advance if you do not plan to attend their party.
Update: You know ahead of time you'll have a scheduling conflict.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is considerate to inform your friend in advance if you do not plan to attend their party.
Update: you haven't had a change due to an emergency situation
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is considerate to inform your friend in advance if you do not plan to attend their party.
Update: you were not planning on attending at all
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is considerate to inform your friend in advance if you do not plan to attend their party.
Update: You unexpectedly fall ill.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is considerate to inform your friend in advance if you do not plan to attend their party.
Update: You are the one helping them get the party ready.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is considerate to inform your friend in advance if you do not plan to attend their party.
Update: you have an accident or emergency
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is considerate to inform your friend in advance if you do not plan to attend their party.
Update: you want to remain in their good graces
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is considerate to inform your friend in advance if you do not plan to attend their party.
Update: you have no way of getting the message to them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is considerate to inform your friend in advance if you do not plan to attend their party.
Update: you want to be invited to the next party
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to pass the blame of your farts onto someone else.
Update: They are very stinky.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to pass the blame of your farts onto someone else.
Update: you think you can get away with it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to pass the blame of your farts onto someone else.
Update: you had a curry for lunch.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to pass the blame of your farts onto someone else.
Update: You're trying to be a good person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to pass the blame of your farts onto someone else.
Update: you are blaming them on your dog.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to pass the blame of your farts onto someone else.
Update: it is in front of your boss.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to pass the blame of your farts onto someone else.
Update: you're joking around with your siblings
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't try to pass the blame of your farts onto someone else.
Update: it's obvious where it came from
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include credit for someone who did something important.
Update: They want to remain anonymous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include credit for someone who did something important.
Update: They did most of the work on a school project.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include credit for someone who did something important.
Update: Unless they have already left the company.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include credit for someone who did something important.
Update: Especially if you want to be perceived as fair.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include credit for someone who did something important.
Update: they are a whistle blower.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include credit for someone who did something important.
Update: they could get a promotions from the work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include credit for someone who did something important.
Update: They told you they wanted to stay anonymous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include credit for someone who did something important.
Update: They did a lot of work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include credit for someone who did something important.
Update: the person asked that their name be left off.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include credit for someone who did something important.
Update: the person helped you in any way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't provoke others.
Update: You are trying to start a riot.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't provoke others.
Update: You want other people to be calm and happy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't provoke others.
Update: They are known bullies.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't provoke others.
Update: You are small in stature.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't provoke others.
Update: They could become violent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't provoke others.
Update: You are trying to motivate them as part of a team.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't provoke others.
Update: They have been very nice to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't provoke others.
Update: It is part of a strategy during a boxing match.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't provoke others.
Update: They are married to your mother.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Coworkers should trust each other.
Update: they have just met.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Coworkers should trust each other.
Update: they have been together a long time
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Coworkers should trust each other.
Update: They are sales people competing for sales.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Coworkers should trust each other.
Update: They work in a prison together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Coworkers should trust each other.
Update: Your coworkers are known to be gossipers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Coworkers should trust each other.
Update: Your work is based on trust and mutual respect.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Coworkers should trust each other.
Update: Someone keeps eating lunches out of the fridge.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Coworkers should trust each other.
Update: You work at a bank.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Coworkers should trust each other.
Update: they are competing
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Coworkers should trust each other.
Update: they need each others support
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unreliable to refuse to do what it takes to finish a project at work on time.
Update: It isn't possible to get the work in on time regardless of start time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unreliable to refuse to do what it takes to finish a project at work on time.
Update: You want to stay in your bosses favor
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unreliable to refuse to do what it takes to finish a project at work on time.
Update: the deadline is not possible to meet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unreliable to refuse to do what it takes to finish a project at work on time.
Update: the team is counting on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unreliable to refuse to do what it takes to finish a project at work on time.
Update: You can’t get everyone on board to finish it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unreliable to refuse to do what it takes to finish a project at work on time.
Update: You are the only one who needs to finish their portion of the project
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unreliable to refuse to do what it takes to finish a project at work on time.
Update: you think you can make the project better while being a little late
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unreliable to refuse to do what it takes to finish a project at work on time.
Update: there's a strict deadline
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unreliable to refuse to do what it takes to finish a project at work on time.
Update: You're the only person who can do it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if your housemates are excessively leaving appliances on.
Update: They are hosting a dinner and need to cook all day.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if your housemates are excessively leaving appliances on.
Update: The electric bill was excessive last month.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if your housemates are excessively leaving appliances on.
Update: You don't pay for electricity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if your housemates are excessively leaving appliances on.
Update: Their appliances aren't energy efficient.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if your housemates are excessively leaving appliances on.
Update: you also leave appliances on.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if your housemates are excessively leaving appliances on.
Update: you are splitting the utility bills.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if your housemates are excessively leaving appliances on.
Update: The housemates are paying the utility bill.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if your housemates are excessively leaving appliances on.
Update: The appliances cause a fire hazard.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if your housemates are excessively leaving appliances on.
Update: You don’t own the appliances
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to be upset if your housemates are excessively leaving appliances on.
Update: You bought all the appliances
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you almost run someone over in your car, you should stop and make sure they're okay.
Update: They have a gun
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you almost run someone over in your car, you should stop and make sure they're okay.
Update: they are unconscious
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you almost run someone over in your car, you should stop and make sure they're okay.
Update: They were trying to rob you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you almost run someone over in your car, you should stop and make sure they're okay.
Update: They are a small child
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you almost run someone over in your car, you should stop and make sure they're okay.
Update: You never saw or realized what happened.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you almost run someone over in your car, you should stop and make sure they're okay.
Update: You don't want to go to jail for a hit and run.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you almost run someone over in your car, you should stop and make sure they're okay.
Update: Unless they are running from the police.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you almost run someone over in your car, you should stop and make sure they're okay.
Update: Especially if they are a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you almost run someone over in your car, you should stop and make sure they're okay.
Update: They are chasing you with a weapon.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you almost run someone over in your car, you should stop and make sure they're okay.
Update: They fall down trying to get away from car.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: There's no obligation to tolerate people in your home who you don't want there.
Update: They're refugees and have nowhere else to do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: There's no obligation to tolerate people in your home who you don't want there.
Update: They have their own home to go to.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: There's no obligation to tolerate people in your home who you don't want there.
Update: they are the police and they have a warrant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: There's no obligation to tolerate people in your home who you don't want there.
Update: they are toxic people and damaging to your well-being.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: There's no obligation to tolerate people in your home who you don't want there.
Update: They're police officers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: There's no obligation to tolerate people in your home who you don't want there.
Update: They're toxic people.
Update type: strengthener