tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's wrong to revoke your offer.
Update: you signed an agreement.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you include a significant other in your activities.
Update: you are single.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you include a significant other in your activities.
Update: it is a couples therapy session.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you include a significant other in your activities.
Update: the invitation specifies otherwise.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you include a significant other in your activities.
Update: your significant other would enjoy those activities.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you include a significant other in your activities.
Update: The significant other is busy working.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you include a significant other in your activities.
Update: Both of you have free time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you include a significant other in your activities.
Update: they have stated that they don't want to be included.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you include a significant other in your activities.
Update: they include you in their activities.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you include a significant other in your activities.
Update: the activities are work related only.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you include a significant other in your activities.
Update: you want to spend more time together.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have to do things in your job other people might not like.
Update: you get stuck with the tasks all of the time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have to do things in your job other people might not like.
Update: you are low man on the totem pole.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have to do things in your job other people might not like.
Update: Doing those things hurts people financially or emotionally
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have to do things in your job other people might not like.
Update: There are no rules governing against doing certain things
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have to do things in your job other people might not like.
Update: those things can cause you serious harm.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have to do things in your job other people might not like.
Update: you are being paid quite a bit to do it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have to do things in your job other people might not like.
Update: This causes problems in the workplace
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have to do things in your job other people might not like.
Update: These jobs are a necessity to do
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have to do things in your job other people might not like.
Update: your job actually harms people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to have to do things in your job other people might not like.
Update: you are working for the greater good,
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to want to share personal possessions.
Update: The other person shares frequently with you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to want to share personal possessions.
Update: The other person never returns your items.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to want to share personal possessions.
Update: By doing so you will put the other persons health in jeopardy
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to want to share personal possessions.
Update: They do not treat your possesions with respect
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to want to share personal possessions.
Update: someone needs it to survive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to want to share personal possessions.
Update: they are family heirlooms
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to want to share personal possessions.
Update: someone else has nothing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to want to share personal possessions.
Update: other people don't take care of your possessions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to want to share personal possessions.
Update: it's with your twin.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay not to want to share personal possessions.
Update: the person has a history of not returning things.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Drinking too much alcohol is frowned upon.
Update: You are not driving and are in a safe place to drink
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Drinking too much alcohol is frowned upon.
Update: You are supposed to be the designated driver at the party
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Drinking too much alcohol is frowned upon.
Update: you are celebrating an important and special occasion
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Drinking too much alcohol is frowned upon.
Update: you wish to make a good impression of people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Drinking too much alcohol is frowned upon.
Update: You are going to be driving soon.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Drinking too much alcohol is frowned upon.
Update: You're in a drinking contest.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Drinking too much alcohol is frowned upon.
Update: You have liver problems.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Drinking too much alcohol is frowned upon.
Update: You are the bachelor at your bachelor party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Drinking too much alcohol is frowned upon.
Update: You are at a work function.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Significant others are expected to pause movies when their partner falls asleep.
Update: Their partner wasn't interested in the movie they were watching.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Significant others are expected to pause movies when their partner falls asleep.
Update: Their partner was the one who wanted to watch the movie.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Significant others are expected to pause movies when their partner falls asleep.
Update: their partner has given them permission to finish the movie.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Significant others are expected to pause movies when their partner falls asleep.
Update: they and their partner have been planning to watch the movie.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Significant others are expected to pause movies when their partner falls asleep.
Update: the partner tells you not to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Significant others are expected to pause movies when their partner falls asleep.
Update: it is a movie that both parties wanted to see.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Significant others are expected to pause movies when their partner falls asleep.
Update: The partner has already seen the movie several times and has said it was okay to watch without them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Significant others are expected to pause movies when their partner falls asleep.
Update: This is a movie your partner has really been excited to watch with you for the first time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Significant others are expected to pause movies when their partner falls asleep.
Update: the movie was boring them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Significant others are expected to pause movies when their partner falls asleep.
Update: you know it's a movie they've wanted to see.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not choose an ex over your current partner.
Update: The ex has changed who they are and your current partner is kind of crazy
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not choose an ex over your current partner.
Update: The ex cheated on you multiple times
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not choose an ex over your current partner.
Update: you and your current partner agree that the relationship isn't working
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not choose an ex over your current partner.
Update: you and your current partner have a good relationship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not choose an ex over your current partner.
Update: your current partner doesn't make you happy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not choose an ex over your current partner.
Update: the ex was abusive in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not choose an ex over your current partner.
Update: You are trying to get back at your current partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not choose an ex over your current partner.
Update: You are in love with your current partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not choose an ex over your current partner.
Update: you love your current partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want a more inclusive work environment.
Update: You understand the benefits of a diverse work environment.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want a more inclusive work environment.
Update: You feel you are being excluded at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want a more inclusive work environment.
Update: It gets in the way of work progress.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want a more inclusive work environment.
Update: The work you do is for social justice.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want a more inclusive work environment.
Update: you are in a one person office.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want a more inclusive work environment.
Update: everyone is out for themselves.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want a more inclusive work environment.
Update: It's a professional sports team and the owners want to include people who are physically incapable of playing the game.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want a more inclusive work environment.
Update: A member of a minority group has the ability and talent to help your company succeed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If there is a good reason, it is understandable to be cold towards your father.
Update: Your father is dying.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If there is a good reason, it is understandable to be cold towards your father.
Update: Your father abandoned you as a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If there is a good reason, it is understandable to be cold towards your father.
Update: You don't understand what your father goes through.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If there is a good reason, it is understandable to be cold towards your father.
Update: Your father is unreasonable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If there is a good reason, it is understandable to be cold towards your father.
Update: your father is trying hard to reconcile with you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If there is a good reason, it is understandable to be cold towards your father.
Update: your father has walked out on your family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If there is a good reason, it is understandable to be cold towards your father.
Update: He always treats you with respect.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If there is a good reason, it is understandable to be cold towards your father.
Update: He has blamed you for something that you haven't done.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If there is a good reason, it is understandable to be cold towards your father.
Update: You father is on their death bed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If there is a good reason, it is understandable to be cold towards your father.
Update: Your father is abusive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to disturb other people's property.
Update: You are in the process of saving lives.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to disturb other people's property.
Update: No trespassing signs are posted all around.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to disturb other people's property.
Update: You are rescuing an injured animal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to disturb other people's property.
Update: There are "no tresspassing" signs clearly posted.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to disturb other people's property.
Update: you are trying to save them from a fire.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to disturb other people's property.
Update: they have a no trespassing sign posted.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to disturb other people's property.
Update: they left it parked on your property.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to disturb other people's property.
Update: it's not bothering you in any way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to disturb other people's property.
Update: You need to break a window to rescue a neighbor whose house is on fire.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to disturb other people's property.
Update: You can get arrested for vandalism if you mess up another person's property.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to get upset at your sibling if you say something to hurt them.
Update: your sibling was deliberately provoking you to say something hurtful.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to get upset at your sibling if you say something to hurt them.
Update: you have made them cry.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to get upset at your sibling if you say something to hurt them.
Update: they were saying mean things to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to get upset at your sibling if you say something to hurt them.
Update: they were just joking around.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to get upset at your sibling if you say something to hurt them.
Update: it is in order to protect them from something worse.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to get upset at your sibling if you say something to hurt them.
Update: what you say causes them pain.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to get upset at your sibling if you say something to hurt them.
Update: you and your sibling are fighting and it is reciprocal
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to get upset at your sibling if you say something to hurt them.
Update: they are younger than you and need your support
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to get upset at your sibling if you say something to hurt them.
Update: Your sibling is taking care of you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If someone important to you does not trust you, you should have a discussion with them about why.
Update: You have deliberately done something to violate that trust, again.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If someone important to you does not trust you, you should have a discussion with them about why.
Update: You are married to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If someone important to you does not trust you, you should have a discussion with them about why.
Update: you really don't care.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If someone important to you does not trust you, you should have a discussion with them about why.
Update: you value your relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If someone important to you does not trust you, you should have a discussion with them about why.
Update: You continually abuse their trust.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If someone important to you does not trust you, you should have a discussion with them about why.
Update: They are your estranged spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If someone important to you does not trust you, you should have a discussion with them about why.
Update: you already know the reason
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If someone important to you does not trust you, you should have a discussion with them about why.
Update: you want to work things out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If someone important to you does not trust you, you should have a discussion with them about why.
Update: You are ready to cut them out of your life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If someone important to you does not trust you, you should have a discussion with them about why.
Update: You want to better the relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to leave people because they have trauma.
Update: They specifically ask you to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to leave people because they have trauma.
Update: They can't survive without your help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to leave people because they have trauma.
Update: you need to get away to be healthy yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to leave people because they have trauma.
Update: they are your family, and have nobody else.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to leave people because they have trauma.
Update: you know you being there is making it worse
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to leave people because they have trauma.
Update: they have no other support
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to leave people because they have trauma.
Update: You also have trauma that needs medical attention.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to leave people because they have trauma.
Update: The people will die if you don't do anything to help them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to leave people because they have trauma.
Update: They ask for some time alone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to leave people because they have trauma.
Update: They're not safe to be left alone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be careless with another person's property.
Update: They were going to throw it away.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be careless with another person's property.
Update: It's very expensive or easily damaged.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be careless with another person's property.
Update: They are wanting to destroy it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be careless with another person's property.
Update: They've let you borrow it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be careless with another person's property.
Update: the property is something that is worthless.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be careless with another person's property.
Update: the property is important to the other person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be careless with another person's property.
Update: they said they were going to throw it away anyway
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be careless with another person's property.
Update: it was brand new
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be careless with another person's property.
Update: You are taking out their trash.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be careless with another person's property.
Update: They have trusted you with their belongings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to disrespect elders.
Update: They do something harmful to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to disrespect elders.
Update: They're asking you for help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to disrespect elders.
Update: they have been actively cruel to someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to disrespect elders.
Update: they have treated everyone extremely well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to disrespect elders.
Update: An old man or woman is very rude to you in passing
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to disrespect elders.
Update: They are trying to be nice you and are lonely
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to disrespect elders.
Update: Your elders love you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to disrespect elders.
Update: they are saying or doing something harmful.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to disrespect elders.
Update: It is a close family member.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with family members if they've given you reason to be.
Update: they are right about what they are saying and you are wrong.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with family members if they've given you reason to be.
Update: they have harmed you in some way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with family members if they've given you reason to be.
Update: they've made you upset by trying to help you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with family members if they've given you reason to be.
Update: they've done something to offend you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with family members if they've given you reason to be.
Update: they can't help their behavior.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with family members if they've given you reason to be.
Update: family members are trying to deliberately upset you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with family members if they've given you reason to be.
Update: The reason they've given you is false.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with family members if they've given you reason to be.
Update: Your family member hasn't apologized.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with family members if they've given you reason to be.
Update: They didn't do it intentionally.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset with family members if they've given you reason to be.
Update: They continually upset you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to have activities with your spouse.
Update: you need some alone time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to have activities with your spouse.
Update: you both have busy lives.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to have activities with your spouse.
Update: They are illegal activities that put other people's lives in danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to have activities with your spouse.
Update: You share the same interests.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to have activities with your spouse.
Update: You and your spouse are deep in debt.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to have activities with your spouse.
Update: You and your spouse have free time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to have activities with your spouse.
Update: you strongly feel you need more alone time
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to have activities with your spouse.
Update: you want to strengthen your relationship with your spouse
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to have activities with your spouse.
Update: Your spouse wants to spend time on his hobby.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to have activities with your spouse.
Update: The activities are something both of you love.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason, it is OK to reject a friend.
Update: Your friend is drowning and could die if you don't help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason, it is OK to reject a friend.
Update: Your friend is being emotionally abusive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason, it is OK to reject a friend.
Update: You are just being selfish.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason, it is OK to reject a friend.
Update: They don't have your best interests in mind.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason, it is OK to reject a friend.
Update: you promised you wouldn't.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason, it is OK to reject a friend.
Update: they have become toxic to be around.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason, it is OK to reject a friend.
Update: that friend is really going through something bad.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason, it is OK to reject a friend.
Update: you have already made plans elsewhere.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason, it is OK to reject a friend.
Update: The friend needs help.
Update type: weakener