tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's good to apologize when you've done something wrong.
Update: you have hurt the environment, not a person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to apologize when you've done something wrong.
Update: you think you can make it up to the person some way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to assume the motives of another person.
Update: it is perfectly clear they are only in it for themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to assume the motives of another person.
Update: you have never talked to them and have no idea what they are thinking.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to assume the motives of another person.
Update: They have a reputation
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to assume the motives of another person.
Update: You don’t know the person at all l
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to assume the motives of another person.
Update: You desperately need to act.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to assume the motives of another person.
Update: You're just getting to know them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to assume the motives of another person.
Update: The person has told you what their motives are and it's not what you assume.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to assume the motives of another person.
Update: You're a private investigator.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to assume the motives of another person.
Update: You could ask the person what their motives are.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to honk your horn if using your horn informs others of your presence.
Update: you are just doing it to scare people on the side of the road.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to honk your horn if using your horn informs others of your presence.
Update: visibility is limited due to stormy weather.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to honk your horn if using your horn informs others of your presence.
Update: Unless it's going to startle or scare someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to honk your horn if using your horn informs others of your presence.
Update: Especially if they are in the street where you are driving.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to honk your horn if using your horn informs others of your presence.
Update: Someone is facing away from you while walking into traffic
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to honk your horn if using your horn informs others of your presence.
Update: You're trying to stay under cover.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to honk your horn if using your horn informs others of your presence.
Update: You're trying to tell people to make way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to honk your horn if using your horn informs others of your presence.
Update: it is late at night and people are sleeping.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to honk your horn if using your horn informs others of your presence.
Update: you are running late.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have personal preferences about foods.
Update: your preferences harm other people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have personal preferences about foods.
Update: you don't harm anyone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have personal preferences about foods.
Update: You insult the chef to their face.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have personal preferences about foods.
Update: You have certain food allergies.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have personal preferences about foods.
Update: You refuse to eat anything healthy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have personal preferences about foods.
Update: You have food allergies.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have personal preferences about foods.
Update: you cannot afford to be picky.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have personal preferences about foods.
Update: you have allergies to foods.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have personal preferences about foods.
Update: it affects other people around you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's ok to have personal preferences about foods.
Update: certain foods could make you sick
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Underage children should not watch R rated movies.
Update: there is a lot of violence.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Underage children should not watch R rated movies.
Update: They are mature for their age
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Underage children should not watch R rated movies.
Update: The content will scare them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Underage children should not watch R rated movies.
Update: It contains gore and graphic violence.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Underage children should not watch R rated movies.
Update: Their parents let them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Underage children should not watch R rated movies.
Update: Their parents do not allow it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to have a preference in who you are attracted to
Update: your preferences are due to racism.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to have a preference in who you are attracted to
Update: you are picky.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to have a preference in who you are attracted to
Update: You are supposed to have a matched wedding
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to have a preference in who you are attracted to
Update: You are an independent person
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to have a preference in who you are attracted to
Update: You know exactly what you want in another person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to have a preference in who you are attracted to
Update: Unless you are an adult who's attracted to children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to have a preference in who you are attracted to
Update: Especially if you are a single adult.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to have a preference in who you are attracted to
Update: it is your own sibling to whom you are attracted.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: IT is okay to have a preference in who you are attracted to
Update: you are not in a relationship with anyone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get upset at your parents.
Update: they have been snooping through your personal items.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get upset at your parents.
Update: they are just trying to give you advice.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get upset at your parents.
Update: they keep sticking their noses in your business when you have asked them not to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get upset at your parents.
Update: they are trying to teach you life lessons when you are in high school.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get upset at your parents.
Update: they try to force you to do something illegal
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get upset at your parents.
Update: they are trying to help you with what you asked for help with
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get upset at your parents.
Update: They wouldn't buy you the toy you grabbed at the store.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get upset at your parents.
Update: You still call them "Mommy" and "Daddy."
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get upset at your parents.
Update: You are overreacting and in the wrong.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get upset at your parents.
Update: They did something horrible to hurt your relationship with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are within your right to end a relationship with  someone for any reason.
Update: Your reasons are based on assumptions about the person without cold hard fact.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are within your right to end a relationship with  someone for any reason.
Update: The person you're dumping has been abusive to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are within your right to end a relationship with  someone for any reason.
Update: You find out that you do not want to be with them anymore.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are within your right to end a relationship with  someone for any reason.
Update: The other depends on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are within your right to end a relationship with  someone for any reason.
Update: The reason is drug abuse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are within your right to end a relationship with  someone for any reason.
Update: You are still in love with them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are within your right to end a relationship with  someone for any reason.
Update: You think that the relationship is going nowhere
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are within your right to end a relationship with  someone for any reason.
Update: You're dependent on that person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are within your right to end a relationship with  someone for any reason.
Update: You're independent on that person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to have something all to yourself.
Update: it was purchased as a shared item.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to have something all to yourself.
Update: you bought and paid for it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to have something all to yourself.
Update: it's better to share
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to have something all to yourself.
Update: you earned it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to have something all to yourself.
Update: Unless it doesn't belong to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to have something all to yourself.
Update: It is a small piece of candy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to have something all to yourself.
Update: you're only paying for half of it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to have something all to yourself.
Update: you are paying for the entire thing
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to have something all to yourself.
Update: there are others who have a stronger need for it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to want to have something all to yourself.
Update: it has a special meaning to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you need to be able to use things other people aren't using.
Update: Unless you aren't returning them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you need to be able to use things other people aren't using.
Update: Especially if they sometimes use your things too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you need to be able to use things other people aren't using.
Update: they aren't yours to use.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you need to be able to use things other people aren't using.
Update: they are things like mobility aids.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you need to be able to use things other people aren't using.
Update: You forget to put them back.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you need to be able to use things other people aren't using.
Update: You put them back after using.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you need to be able to use things other people aren't using.
Update: They ask you not to touch those items.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you need to be able to use things other people aren't using.
Update: The items are community items.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you need to be able to use things other people aren't using.
Update: You make a habit of asking for special favors or making special requests all the time
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay if you need to be able to use things other people aren't using.
Update: Your work involves things other people aren't doing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being hurt that your sibling didn't tell you they were having an important procedure done is acceptable.
Update: They were unable to tell you themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being hurt that your sibling didn't tell you they were having an important procedure done is acceptable.
Update: You are really close to your sibling.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being hurt that your sibling didn't tell you they were having an important procedure done is acceptable.
Update: You haven't seen your sibling in years because you hate each other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being hurt that your sibling didn't tell you they were having an important procedure done is acceptable.
Update: You and your sibling are very very close and share everything with each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being hurt that your sibling didn't tell you they were having an important procedure done is acceptable.
Update: Your sibling was unconscious due to a medical issue.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being hurt that your sibling didn't tell you they were having an important procedure done is acceptable.
Update: Your sibling had been planning the procedure for many months.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being hurt that your sibling didn't tell you they were having an important procedure done is acceptable.
Update: They didn't know until the day before.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being hurt that your sibling didn't tell you they were having an important procedure done is acceptable.
Update: They had it planned for a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Being hurt that your sibling didn't tell you they were having an important procedure done is acceptable.
Update: You do not handle crisis well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being hurt that your sibling didn't tell you they were having an important procedure done is acceptable.
Update: You wanted to be there to support your sibling.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to intentionally ignore a friend or family member
Update: They are acting out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to intentionally ignore a friend or family member
Update: They are crying.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to intentionally ignore a friend or family member
Update: they are ignoring you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to intentionally ignore a friend or family member
Update: it is for a petty reason.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to intentionally ignore a friend or family member
Update: They are toxic
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to intentionally ignore a friend or family member
Update: They miss you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to intentionally ignore a friend or family member
Update: The friend or family member is highly abusive to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to intentionally ignore a friend or family member
Update: They need you at a critical time and are good to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to intentionally ignore a friend or family member
Update: You are trying to concentrate on driving.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to intentionally ignore a friend or family member
Update: They are a baby.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's healthy to have boundaries in your professional life.
Update: You are kind of creepy
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's healthy to have boundaries in your professional life.
Update: You have a hierarchy in your business
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's healthy to have boundaries in your professional life.
Update: You are a 24/7 personal assistant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's healthy to have boundaries in your professional life.
Update: Your boss tries to contact you during non-work hours constantly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's healthy to have boundaries in your professional life.
Update: You have been taken advantage of in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's healthy to have boundaries in your professional life.
Update: you hide behind those boundaries.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's healthy to have boundaries in your professional life.
Update: you take too many risks.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's healthy to have boundaries in your professional life.
Update: you need to be more open
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's healthy to have boundaries in your professional life.
Update: you need to distance yourself
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to console people that you care about.
Update: You simply don't have the time to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to console people that you care about.
Update: They are going through a very hard time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to console people that you care about.
Update: They won't even tell you why they're upset.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to console people that you care about.
Update: It's someone in your immediate family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to console people that you care about.
Update: They are deceased.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to console people that you care about.
Update: You are at a funeral.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to console people that you care about.
Update: Unless they don't want anyone near them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to console people that you care about.
Update: Especially if they are your child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to console people that you care about.
Update: They are upset because you won't give them money for drugs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to console people that you care about.
Update: They have just received news that a family member has passed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should learn to work together with others.
Update: They are stubborn
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should learn to work together with others.
Update: You need to get along to go along
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should learn to work together with others.
Update: Your employment involves working solo from home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should learn to work together with others.
Update: Your employment involves working in an office on a team daily.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should learn to work together with others.
Update: The people around you have harmful ideologies.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should learn to work together with others.
Update: You want to succeed in your career.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should learn to work together with others.
Update: You are writing a survival manual for loners.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should learn to work together with others.
Update: You want to lessen the time and effort you need to expend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should learn to work together with others.
Update: you were assigned an individual task.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should learn to work together with others.
Update: you work as part of a team at your job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be indifferent to peoples situations that they put themselves in.
Update: They are someone close to you and they need your help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be indifferent to peoples situations that they put themselves in.
Update: You have told them in the past that you do not care to know about their lives.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be indifferent to peoples situations that they put themselves in.
Update: You're that person's parent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be indifferent to peoples situations that they put themselves in.
Update: You're a stranger to that person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be indifferent to peoples situations that they put themselves in.
Update: They are driving your child home while drunk.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be indifferent to peoples situations that they put themselves in.
Update: They ruined your reputation at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be indifferent to peoples situations that they put themselves in.
Update: the situation was out of their control.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be indifferent to peoples situations that they put themselves in.
Update: they are constantly bringing trouble onto themselves.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be indifferent to peoples situations that they put themselves in.
Update: You are close with those people
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be indifferent to peoples situations that they put themselves in.
Update: You don’t know the people that well
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't favor certain people over others.
Update: You are responsible for hiring people for a job and have to pick the best one.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't favor certain people over others.
Update: All the people are in your close family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't favor certain people over others.
Update: they do an outstanding job
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't favor certain people over others.
Update: they are on equal terms with the others
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't favor certain people over others.
Update: you are a judge
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't favor certain people over others.
Update: they are your own children
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't favor certain people over others.
Update: You are favoring your own family over non-family.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't favor certain people over others.
Update: You are favoring one of your children over another.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't favor certain people over others.
Update: You have to promote only one person in your department.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't favor certain people over others.
Update: Those people are your children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should treat animals with respect.
Update: The animal is attacking you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should treat animals with respect.
Update: The animal is a family pet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should treat animals with respect.
Update: They are attacking you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should treat animals with respect.
Update: It is your pet and you love them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should treat animals with respect.
Update: one of them is attacking you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should treat animals with respect.
Update: they are not bothering you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should treat animals with respect.
Update: You're trying to stamp out an invasive species.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should treat animals with respect.
Update: You're a veterinarian.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should treat animals with respect.
Update: The animal is trying to maul your child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should treat animals with respect.
Update: You value all life on this planet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Grandchildren are expected to love and respect their grandparents.
Update: Unless their grandparents are criminals.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Grandchildren are expected to love and respect their grandparents.
Update: Especially if their grandparents help take care of them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Grandchildren are expected to love and respect their grandparents.
Update: Their grandparents were abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Grandchildren are expected to love and respect their grandparents.
Update: Their grandparents raised them.
Update type: strengthener