tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's good to stand up for marginalized people.
Update: they are being taken advantage of.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to kill other people.
Update: You are trying to defend yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to kill other people.
Update: They are innocent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to kill other people.
Update: You're in the military under orders.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to kill other people.
Update: You're a civilian.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to kill other people.
Update: You have been ordered to do so in a time of war.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to kill other people.
Update: Your state has the death penalty.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to kill other people.
Update: you are in mortal danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to kill other people.
Update: you don't want to go to jail.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to kill other people.
Update: You're fighting a war
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to try to kill other people.
Update: You are robbing a house
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to exclude others.
Update: You're excluding racists.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to exclude others.
Update: You're excluding people based on race.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to exclude others.
Update: They lack the necessary skills.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to exclude others.
Update: It is based on race.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to exclude others.
Update: They're strangers who have no business intruding on your family event.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to exclude others.
Update: The others are your first-degree relatives.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to exclude others.
Update: They will bring toxicity into the space
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to exclude others.
Update: Their spouses are invited
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to exclude others.
Update: They are toxic
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to exclude others.
Update: They are your best friends
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you learn they have a sexually transmitted disease.
Update: They have HIV
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you learn they have a sexually transmitted disease.
Update: You gave it to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you learn they have a sexually transmitted disease.
Update: They got it while cheating on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you learn they have a sexually transmitted disease.
Update: You were the one who gave them the disease.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you learn they have a sexually transmitted disease.
Update: They didn't tell you or use condoms.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you learn they have a sexually transmitted disease.
Update: you knew about the disease before you got together with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to break up with someone if you learn they have a sexually transmitted disease.
Update: they contracted the disease by cheating on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should make an effort to see your in-laws when they are over.
Update: Your in laws are toxic
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should make an effort to see your in-laws when they are over.
Update: You want to hang out with them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should make an effort to see your in-laws when they are over.
Update: Your inlaws hate you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should make an effort to see your in-laws when they are over.
Update: They are only in town for a few days.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should make an effort to see your in-laws when they are over.
Update: You do not get along with your in-laws.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should make an effort to see your in-laws when they are over.
Update: You don't get to see them that often.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should make an effort to see your in-laws when they are over.
Update: Your in-laws make fun of you a lot.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should make an effort to see your in-laws when they are over.
Update: Your in-laws love you a lot.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should make an effort to see your in-laws when they are over.
Update: You always end up in an argument with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should make an effort to see your in-laws when they are over.
Update: You enjoy their company.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to support someone who shares their experience at the receiving end of harassment.
Update: They are a liar.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to support someone who shares their experience at the receiving end of harassment.
Update: You believe them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to support someone who shares their experience at the receiving end of harassment.
Update: You find out that they lied about the whole situation
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to support someone who shares their experience at the receiving end of harassment.
Update: you want them to be able to move on with your life
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to support someone who shares their experience at the receiving end of harassment.
Update: They are actually a bad person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to support someone who shares their experience at the receiving end of harassment.
Update: They are inspirational
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to support someone who shares their experience at the receiving end of harassment.
Update: You are the one who was harassing them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to support someone who shares their experience at the receiving end of harassment.
Update: You are their spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to support someone who shares their experience at the receiving end of harassment.
Update: That person interprets your words of support as sarcasm.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to support someone who shares their experience at the receiving end of harassment.
Update: You can share your own stories to make them feel less alone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't continue talking to your ex's.
Update: You have kids together.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't continue talking to your ex's.
Update: They were abusive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't continue talking to your ex's.
Update: You are coparenting
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't continue talking to your ex's.
Update: You have feelings for them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't continue talking to your ex's.
Update: You are still interested in them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't continue talking to your ex's.
Update: You are in a new relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't continue talking to your ex's.
Update: They know where your missing children are.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't continue talking to your ex's.
Update: They sued you when you did nothing wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't continue talking to your ex's.
Update: You want to keep hurting.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't continue talking to your ex's.
Update: If you want to move on.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone much older than you if you're a minor.
Update: They emotionally manipulate you into doing things you're not comfortable with.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone much older than you if you're a minor.
Update: there is a one year age difference.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone much older than you if you're a minor.
Update: it is illegal.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone much older than you if you're a minor.
Update: You have parental permission.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone much older than you if you're a minor.
Update: You hide it from your parents.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone much older than you if you're a minor.
Update: This person is a sexual predator
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone much older than you if you're a minor.
Update: You're in a country where the age of consent is very low.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone much older than you if you're a minor.
Update: You're in the USA.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be understanding of your friends' situations.
Update: they will not explain their problems.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to be understanding of your friends' situations.
Update: they just need someone to listen.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be understanding of your friends' situations.
Update: Your friends have always been there for you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be understanding of your friends' situations.
Update: They brought on their own misfortune.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to be understanding of your friends' situations.
Update: They lost their job unexpectedly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be understanding of your friends' situations.
Update: they are selling drugs to children on the street.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to be understanding of your friends' situations.
Update: they are having a tough time and trying to better their lives.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to be understanding of your friends' situations.
Update: Your friends are idiots
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to be understanding of your friends' situations.
Update: Your friends need support
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to start a new relationship until the previous one has clearly ended.
Update: You're separated and it's a matter of paperwork.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to start a new relationship until the previous one has clearly ended.
Update: You're replacing your wife with a younger model.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to start a new relationship until the previous one has clearly ended.
Update: You're in an open relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to start a new relationship until the previous one has clearly ended.
Update: You're in a monogamous relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to start a new relationship until the previous one has clearly ended.
Update: you're overwhelmed by your emotions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to start a new relationship until the previous one has clearly ended.
Update: you don't want to have a huge amount of break up drama.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to start a new relationship until the previous one has clearly ended.
Update: Your first husband is in prison and won't sign divorce papers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to start a new relationship until the previous one has clearly ended.
Update: You are married with children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to start a new relationship until the previous one has clearly ended.
Update: you are polyamorous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to start a new relationship until the previous one has clearly ended.
Update: the previous one was long and involved.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable that some companies have rules that prevent employees from socializing with any member of the security team.
Update: There is a mass shooting at the company.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable that some companies have rules that prevent employees from socializing with any member of the security team.
Update: The security team is preventing hacking.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable that some companies have rules that prevent employees from socializing with any member of the security team.
Update: There have been crimes committed at work recently.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable that some companies have rules that prevent employees from socializing with any member of the security team.
Update: The security team stays posted outside the work floor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable that some companies have rules that prevent employees from socializing with any member of the security team.
Update: The company is a security company.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable that some companies have rules that prevent employees from socializing with any member of the security team.
Update: The company deals with classified information.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable that some companies have rules that prevent employees from socializing with any member of the security team.
Update: They are spouses.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable that some companies have rules that prevent employees from socializing with any member of the security team.
Update: They are responsible for preventing top security information.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable that some companies have rules that prevent employees from socializing with any member of the security team.
Update: The company has loose enforcement of rules.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable that some companies have rules that prevent employees from socializing with any member of the security team.
Update: They have a government contract.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should take care of your own transportation.
Update: You don't have money for a bus.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should take care of your own transportation.
Update: You have money for the bus.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should take care of your own transportation.
Update: You are agoraphobic and never leave home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should take care of your own transportation.
Update: You are traveling alone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should take care of your own transportation.
Update: You are physically unable to drive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should take care of your own transportation.
Update: You have a car and a driver's license.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should take care of your own transportation.
Update: You are a young child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should take care of your own transportation.
Update: Youhave your own car.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should take care of your own transportation.
Update: You are a minor living at home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should take care of your own transportation.
Update: You're an adult living on your own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason to ignore your wife's calls you need to communicate that to them.
Update: You're stuck in a meeting at work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason to ignore your wife's calls you need to communicate that to them.
Update: You're trying to improve your communication with your spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason to ignore your wife's calls you need to communicate that to them.
Update: Your wife is physically abusive to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason to ignore your wife's calls you need to communicate that to them.
Update: Your wife hasn't done anything wrong to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason to ignore your wife's calls you need to communicate that to them.
Update: its because you were out with a bunch of friends
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason to ignore your wife's calls you need to communicate that to them.
Update: its because your phone's battery ran out
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason to ignore your wife's calls you need to communicate that to them.
Update: They don’t care about a reason
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason to ignore your wife's calls you need to communicate that to them.
Update: You have to be in a business meeting
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason to ignore your wife's calls you need to communicate that to them.
Update: they are overly sensitive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you have a good reason to ignore your wife's calls you need to communicate that to them.
Update: it's due to work issues.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to show affection to your pets.
Update: They have rabies.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to show affection to your pets.
Update: They are not feeling well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to show affection to your pets.
Update: They have eaten food off your plate.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to show affection to your pets.
Update: They are learning new tricks.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to show affection to your pets.
Update: you don't have pets.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to show affection to your pets.
Update: you like clean shoes.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to show affection to your pets.
Update: Your pet is a turtle.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to show affection to your pets.
Update: Your pet comforts you all the time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to show affection to your pets.
Update: Your pets aren't used to human contact yet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to show affection to your pets.
Update: Your pets love snuggles.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You can't expect others to believe you.
Update: You have video evidence.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You can't expect others to believe you.
Update: You've lied to those people and been caught before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You can't expect others to believe you.
Update: You have evidence.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You can't expect others to believe you.
Update: You are making accusations which seem unbelievable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You can't expect others to believe you.
Update: Unless you can prove what you're saying.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You can't expect others to believe you.
Update: Especially if you have told them lies before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You can't expect others to believe you.
Update: you are under oath
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You can't expect others to believe you.
Update: you have lied to them before this
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You can't expect others to believe you.
Update: You have evidence
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You can't expect others to believe you.
Update: You are known for lying all the time
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to call out bad behavior.
Update: You might put yourself in danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to call out bad behavior.
Update: You consider yourself an ally.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to call out bad behavior.
Update: you are also behaving badly and would be hypocritical calling out the bad behavior.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to call out bad behavior.
Update: you are trying to teach children right from wrong behaviors.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to call out bad behavior.
Update: it is justified.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to call out bad behavior.
Update: they are endangering others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to call out bad behavior.
Update: You are setting an example
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to call out bad behavior.
Update: You are nitpicking because you are in a bad mood.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to call out bad behavior.
Update: Someone has just robbed a bank.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get into fights with your parents.
Update: Your parents have been neglecting you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get into fights with your parents.
Update: Your parents are always generous and loving.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get into fights with your parents.
Update: they are trying to control who you marry.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get into fights with your parents.
Update: you live at their home rent-free.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get into fights with your parents.
Update: Your parents are old and frail.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get into fights with your parents.
Update: They are abusing you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get into fights with your parents.
Update: You live at home rent free.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get into fights with your parents.
Update: They are insulting your significant other
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get into fights with your parents.
Update: You live under their roof
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should want to spend time with your parents.
Update: They are toxic people
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should want to spend time with your parents.
Update: They won’t be around forever
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should want to spend time with your parents.
Update: They made your childhood a living hell.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should want to spend time with your parents.
Update: They are getting on in years.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should want to spend time with your parents.
Update: Your parents were verbally abusive
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should want to spend time with your parents.
Update: Your parents are getting very old.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should want to spend time with your parents.
Update: You've just dropped out of college.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should want to spend time with your parents.
Update: Everyone is on break for the holidays.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should want to spend time with your parents.
Update: They abused you when you were a child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should want to spend time with your parents.
Update: You are their legal caregiver.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be your sibling's caretaker or provider.
Update: You are a legal custodian
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be your sibling's caretaker or provider.
Update: Your parents are just being lazy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be your sibling's caretaker or provider.
Update: You made a promise to do so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be your sibling's caretaker or provider.
Update: You have to neglect your own family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be your sibling's caretaker or provider.
Update: You are a minor yourself
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be your sibling's caretaker or provider.
Update: You signed an agreement.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be your sibling's caretaker or provider.
Update: You never wanted kids.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be your sibling's caretaker or provider.
Update: Your parents die and they have no one else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to be your sibling's caretaker or provider.
Update: Your parents are addicted to video games.
Update type: strengthener