tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: You should help out your landlady.
Update: She is elderly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should help out your landlady.
Update: She overcharges you rent
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should help out your landlady.
Update: She is very kind
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will defend your significant other.
Update: your significant other sexually assaulted someone
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will defend your significant other.
Update: your significant other is in the right
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will defend your significant other.
Update: They say something completely out of line and you don't support it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will defend your significant other.
Update: They are threatened physically by others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will defend your significant other.
Update: Your significant other has a temper and started a fight with someone
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will defend your significant other.
Update: A man is threatening to kill them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will defend your significant other.
Update: They do something dangerous and illegal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will defend your significant other.
Update: Someone has wrongly maligned their character.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will defend your significant other.
Update: They have been abusive to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will defend your significant other.
Update: Someone is falsely accusing them of something.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's normal to be surprised if someone swears at you.
Update: You are in a play saying your lines.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's normal to be surprised if someone swears at you.
Update: You didn't do anything to make the other person mad.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's normal to be surprised if someone swears at you.
Update: you have just cut them off in traffic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's normal to be surprised if someone swears at you.
Update: you weren't doing anything to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's normal to be surprised if someone swears at you.
Update: that is commonplace in your life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's normal to be surprised if someone swears at you.
Update: you have done nothing to deserve being sworn at.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's normal to be surprised if someone swears at you.
Update: you are in a cursing match.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's normal to be surprised if someone swears at you.
Update: you are ordering food in a drive through.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's normal to be surprised if someone swears at you.
Update: You're having a heated verbal altercation
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's normal to be surprised if someone swears at you.
Update: This person has never used those words before
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to believe a diagnosis about your significant other.
Update: You are shown visual evidence as proof.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to believe a diagnosis about your significant other.
Update: You are hearing only rumors from people you don't know too well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to believe a diagnosis about your significant other.
Update: A doctor communicated the results to you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to believe a diagnosis about your significant other.
Update: Your significant other is a pathological liar
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to believe a diagnosis about your significant other.
Update: You have already gotten a second opinion and they agree on the diagnosis.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to believe a diagnosis about your significant other.
Update: It is a devastating diagnosis.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to believe a diagnosis about your significant other.
Update: the diagnosis is negative.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to believe a diagnosis about your significant other.
Update: the prognosis is not good.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to believe a diagnosis about your significant other.
Update: Their parents are doctors and agree with the diagnosis.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not want to believe a diagnosis about your significant other.
Update: Their doctor was recently charged with fraud.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want your own personal space.
Update: You are at a concert.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want your own personal space.
Update: You are reading a book in a library.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want your own personal space.
Update: you are never alone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want your own personal space.
Update: You have already had personal space for days
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want your own personal space.
Update: You just lost a loved one
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want your own personal space.
Update: You're on a commercial airline.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want your own personal space.
Update: You're at home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want your own personal space.
Update: The space is in someone else's home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to want your own personal space.
Update: You have your own space and can shut the door.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to complain to a restaurant's customer service, if you were unhappy with their food or service.
Update: There was no good reason to complain, you just want free food.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to complain to a restaurant's customer service, if you were unhappy with their food or service.
Update: The food had a bug in it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to complain to a restaurant's customer service, if you were unhappy with their food or service.
Update: There were bugs in your food
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to complain to a restaurant's customer service, if you were unhappy with their food or service.
Update: You are making up issues with your experience to get a free meal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to complain to a restaurant's customer service, if you were unhappy with their food or service.
Update: They didn't prepare your meal properly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to complain to a restaurant's customer service, if you were unhappy with their food or service.
Update: It was your fault that the food or service was bad.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to complain to a restaurant's customer service, if you were unhappy with their food or service.
Update: They are slow at the time you are eating there.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to complain to a restaurant's customer service, if you were unhappy with their food or service.
Update: you are only doing it to get free food.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to complain to a restaurant's customer service, if you were unhappy with their food or service.
Update: you found something in your food, like bugs or glass.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should take full responsibility for your pet.
Update: they damage someone's property.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should take full responsibility for your pet.
Update: You are in the hospital.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should take full responsibility for your pet.
Update: You made the decision to adopt them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should take full responsibility for your pet.
Update: you've handed that responsibility over to your spouse
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should take full responsibility for your pet.
Update: you are the pet's only guardian
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should take full responsibility for your pet.
Update: You live with a significant other and it was their idea to get one.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should take full responsibility for your pet.
Update: You forgot to tighten their leash and they bite a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should take full responsibility for your pet.
Update: You got the pet with your partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should take full responsibility for your pet.
Update: You live by yourself with the pet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad for people to go on trips only when there is something more important they should be doing.
Update: the important thing they should be doing is eating at their soul
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad for people to go on trips only when there is something more important they should be doing.
Update: the important thing involves their children
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad for people to go on trips only when there is something more important they should be doing.
Update: they have to take the trip to do the important thing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad for people to go on trips only when there is something more important they should be doing.
Update: people are counting on them to do something.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad for people to go on trips only when there is something more important they should be doing.
Update: they need to travel for a wedding
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad for people to go on trips only when there is something more important they should be doing.
Update: they have no one to watch their children
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad for people to go on trips only when there is something more important they should be doing.
Update: The important stuff is time-sensitive
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is bad for people to go on trips only when there is something more important they should be doing.
Update: they have someone else to take care of those tasks.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is bad for people to go on trips only when there is something more important they should be doing.
Update: it is last minute and they did not tell anyone they were going.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect your parents to follow the rules.
Update: they break the rules when it comes down to safety
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect your parents to follow the rules.
Update: they are driving beside a police officer
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect your parents to follow the rules.
Update: You are a toddler and don't know any better.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect your parents to follow the rules.
Update: They are adults and living in your home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect your parents to follow the rules.
Update: the rules are unclear.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect your parents to follow the rules.
Update: they expect you to follow the rules.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect your parents to follow the rules.
Update: They are breaking the rules to protect their child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect your parents to follow the rules.
Update: The rule is their to keep their children safe.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect your parents to follow the rules.
Update: Your parents are in prison for fraud.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to expect your parents to follow the rules.
Update: Your parents are upstanding citizens and professionals.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like certain dogs.
Update: you have no reason to feel that way
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like certain dogs.
Update: you have had a bad experience with that dog
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like certain dogs.
Update: you are a dog trainer and it is your job to get along with all dogs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like certain dogs.
Update: you have been attacked by a certain breed, in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like certain dogs.
Update: Those dogs belong to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like certain dogs.
Update: They growl and make you anxious.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like certain dogs.
Update: You have never had a bad experience with any dogs
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like certain dogs.
Update: You got bit by one as a kid
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like certain dogs.
Update: You are abusive towards the ones you don't like.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not like certain dogs.
Update: You have been bitten by that kind of dog.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's cruel for parents to make fun of their children.
Update: Their children can't help what is wrong with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's cruel for parents to make fun of their children.
Update: The child is in on the joke.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's cruel for parents to make fun of their children.
Update: The child cannot help themselves for whatever the parent is mocking.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's cruel for parents to make fun of their children.
Update: they are just joking around.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's cruel for parents to make fun of their children.
Update: if it hurts the children's feelings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's cruel for parents to make fun of their children.
Update: The parents are pretending to be clowns.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's cruel for parents to make fun of their children.
Update: The children are overly sensitive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's cruel for parents to make fun of their children.
Update: It is good-natured ribbing as a sign of affection.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's cruel for parents to make fun of their children.
Update: It is emotionally painful and leads to tears.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that family will attend an important personal event.
Update: they have been asked not to attend
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that family will attend an important personal event.
Update: they have been invited to the event
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that family will attend an important personal event.
Update: someone falls ill and cannot attend.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that family will attend an important personal event.
Update: the family has a role in the event.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that family will attend an important personal event.
Update: They are sick.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that family will attend an important personal event.
Update: They are part of the event.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that family will attend an important personal event.
Update: They're sick and unable to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that family will attend an important personal event.
Update: They RSVP'd that they would.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that family will attend an important personal event.
Update: They are sick with the flu.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that family will attend an important personal event.
Update: They have nothing else going on.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK if some people are mentally challenged.
Update: they use it as a crutch for special favors
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK if some people are mentally challenged.
Update: they try to be independent regardless
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK if some people are mentally challenged.
Update: you want to show others your kindness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK if some people are mentally challenged.
Update: They are challenged by a birth defect or a brain injury.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not be open to communicate in a relationship.
Update: You have gone no-contact after being abused
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not be open to communicate in a relationship.
Update: You are having fights
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not be open to communicate in a relationship.
Update: You're a secret government agent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not be open to communicate in a relationship.
Update: You're building a loving relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not be open to communicate in a relationship.
Update: You feel unsafe in the relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not be open to communicate in a relationship.
Update: You feel supported and loved in the relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not be open to communicate in a relationship.
Update: One person has abused the other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not be open to communicate in a relationship.
Update: Problems could be solved by communicating better.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not be open to communicate in a relationship.
Update: That person is leaving you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not be open to communicate in a relationship.
Update: You want to have a strong relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to pick up trash.
Update: You're volunteering in the park
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to pick up trash.
Update: the trash is medical waste.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to pick up trash.
Update: you want to keep the beach clean.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to pick up trash.
Update: It is in a garbage receptacle.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to pick up trash.
Update: You are a waste disposal worker.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to pick up trash.
Update: the trash could carry diseases.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to pick up trash.
Update: it is harming the local wildlife.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to pick up trash.
Update: you have to go into dangerous busy traffic to pick it up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to pick up trash.
Update: there is a trash can nearby.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't judge people based on their socio-economic situation.
Update: They got their wealth illegally
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't judge people based on their socio-economic situation.
Update: You've experienced both riches and poor
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't judge people based on their socio-economic situation.
Update: you are the 1%.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't judge people based on their socio-economic situation.
Update: you are wanting to be friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't judge people based on their socio-economic situation.
Update: They are rich and snobby
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't judge people based on their socio-economic situation.
Update: You know what it was like to be poor
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't judge people based on their socio-economic situation.
Update: You are a social climber.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't judge people based on their socio-economic situation.
Update: You want friendships with a wide range of people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't judge people based on their socio-economic situation.
Update: They do not take care of their property and you are about to sell your house.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't judge people based on their socio-economic situation.
Update: You grew up in a shelter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's polite to let people know why you've cut off contact with them.
Update: They stalked you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's polite to let people know why you've cut off contact with them.
Update: They are your immediate family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's polite to let people know why you've cut off contact with them.
Update: They have been stalking you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's polite to let people know why you've cut off contact with them.
Update: You have a child together with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's polite to let people know why you've cut off contact with them.
Update: You don't want to speak with them anymore to protect your own mental health
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's polite to let people know why you've cut off contact with them.
Update: They can learn from the situation
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's polite to let people know why you've cut off contact with them.
Update: They would be more hurt to know the reason.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's polite to let people know why you've cut off contact with them.
Update: You are simply moving on.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's polite to let people know why you've cut off contact with them.
Update: that person intentionally caused you serious hurt
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's polite to let people know why you've cut off contact with them.
Update: you have been friends for some time
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to ditch or leave people on a project just because you get frustrated with them.
Update: The project is something that is optional and not for profit.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to ditch or leave people on a project just because you get frustrated with them.
Update: The project is for a grade in a class.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to ditch or leave people on a project just because you get frustrated with them.
Update: They are going to make you fail.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to ditch or leave people on a project just because you get frustrated with them.
Update: They can't finish without you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to ditch or leave people on a project just because you get frustrated with them.
Update: they treat you very poorly throughout the process.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to ditch or leave people on a project just because you get frustrated with them.
Update: people are depending on your contributions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to ditch or leave people on a project just because you get frustrated with them.
Update: you were doing most of the work on the project
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to ditch or leave people on a project just because you get frustrated with them.
Update: the people on the project depend on you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to ditch or leave people on a project just because you get frustrated with them.
Update: They are not contributing
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to ditch or leave people on a project just because you get frustrated with them.
Update: They are trying their best and helping
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to leave your children with someone while you do drugs.
Update: you are hospitalized with a sickness.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to leave your children with someone while you do drugs.
Update: the people watching your children are also using drugs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to leave your children with someone while you do drugs.
Update: Unless you're getting cancer treatment.
Update type: weakener