tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: You shouldn't annoy your friends.
Update: There is a fire and they need to be pulled out of bed abruptly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't annoy your friends.
Update: They are studying to pass the bar exam.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't annoy your friends.
Update: It is something you strongly believe in.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't annoy your friends.
Update: It is causing a strain on your relationship with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't annoy your friends.
Update: They annoy you and you have a history of playing pranks on each other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't annoy your friends.
Update: They're already really stressed after a bad day at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't annoy your friends.
Update: You are a professional comedian
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't annoy your friends.
Update: You need a favor from them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't annoy your friends.
Update: That is how you get along with your friends and make them laugh
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't annoy your friends.
Update: They just got fired from a job
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should eat food that is given to you.
Update: You are allergic to the food.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should eat food that is given to you.
Update: The food was a gift.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should eat food that is given to you.
Update: You're too full.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should eat food that is given to you.
Update: You're starving for food.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should eat food that is given to you.
Update: It's not cooked properly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should eat food that is given to you.
Update: You are a guest of someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should eat food that is given to you.
Update: You have already eaten and are not hungry.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should eat food that is given to you.
Update: The person has spent all day cooking for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should eat food that is given to you.
Update: You know the food has gone bad or been poisoned.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should eat food that is given to you.
Update: You are  a guest in someone's home at mealtime.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to show someone's personal correspondence without permission.
Update: It is subpoenaed by law
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to show someone's personal correspondence without permission.
Update: It contains sensitive information
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to show someone's personal correspondence without permission.
Update: You're showing it as evidence in a trial.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to show someone's personal correspondence without permission.
Update: They've asked for the conversation to remain private.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to show someone's personal correspondence without permission.
Update: you are a medical professional.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to show someone's personal correspondence without permission.
Update: you post it online.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to show someone's personal correspondence without permission.
Update: You know them so well that you know they don't care about the person you're showing it to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to show someone's personal correspondence without permission.
Update: You know they are a very private person and would be hurt.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to show someone's personal correspondence without permission.
Update: They are discussing doing something illegal or dangerous and you need to get help for them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to show someone's personal correspondence without permission.
Update: You have a trusting relationship with this person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't gift someone something that you might want back
Update: It is a gift they are really excited about receiving.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't gift someone something that you might want back
Update: They have offered to share the gift with you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't gift someone something that you might want back
Update: You know the gift will be important to them and not something they will want to let go of.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't gift someone something that you might want back
Update: They are your brother or sister and you can use the item whenever you like.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't gift someone something that you might want back
Update: The item is a rare family ring that you want to use to propose to your future spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't gift someone something that you might want back
Update: It is for Secret Santa
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't gift someone something that you might want back
Update: You know they will give you something you really love
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't gift someone something that you might want back
Update: You don't have any other gift options.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't gift someone something that you might want back
Update: You cannot replace the gift.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to ignore someone.
Update: They are a child undergoing discipline.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to ignore someone.
Update: They are showing signs of mental illness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to ignore someone.
Update: Someone is yelling at you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to ignore someone.
Update: Your child is talking to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to ignore someone.
Update: You are already very busy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to ignore someone.
Update: You have nothing else to deal with.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to ignore someone.
Update: They are deliberately trying to annoy you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to ignore someone.
Update: They need some sort of help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to ignore someone.
Update: They're a classmate you've never spoken to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to ignore someone.
Update: You used to be best friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to berate anyone in public.
Update: they are being disrespectful to others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to berate anyone in public.
Update: it is in front of a large crowd.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to berate anyone in public.
Update: You're part of a large protest.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to berate anyone in public.
Update: You're an officer of the law.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to berate anyone in public.
Update: The person you are berating is wearing a KKK robe.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to berate anyone in public.
Update: The person you are berating is a small child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to berate anyone in public.
Update: They are attacking someone defenseless.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to berate anyone in public.
Update: That person is a young child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to berate anyone in public.
Update: It is a public protest about a public official.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to berate anyone in public.
Update: The matter is personal and embarrassing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let male friends slap your butt.
Update: You are intimate with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let male friends slap your butt.
Update: You are married and they are not your husband.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let male friends slap your butt.
Update: You are on the football team
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let male friends slap your butt.
Update: You are not comfortable with it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let male friends slap your butt.
Update: it is something done playfully and not against someones will.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let male friends slap your butt.
Update: they are doing it to sexually harass you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let male friends slap your butt.
Update: You have a special relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let male friends slap your butt.
Update: You're not that close to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let male friends slap your butt.
Update: It's something you enjoy, because we don't kink shame.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to let male friends slap your butt.
Update: Your partner feels uncomfortable with them doing it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to hog equipment at the gym.
Update: You are taking a class and need the equipment for the duration of the class.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to hog equipment at the gym.
Update: There is a line of people waiting for the equipment.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to hog equipment at the gym.
Update: They gym is empty and you are by yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to hog equipment at the gym.
Update: The gym is very crowded with people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to hog equipment at the gym.
Update: There is ample equipment there and the gym is quite empty.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to hog equipment at the gym.
Update: The gym is crowded with people waiting to use it too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to hog equipment at the gym.
Update: Nobody else is in the gym.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to hog equipment at the gym.
Update: There is a line waiting to use the machine.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to hog equipment at the gym.
Update: The gym is empty.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to hog equipment at the gym.
Update: The gym is very busy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be generous with others.
Update: They have nothing else to give but themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be generous with others.
Update: They have invited them into their homes.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be generous with others.
Update: they hold a grudge.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be generous with others.
Update: they are well off.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be generous with others.
Update: They are poor
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be generous with others.
Update: They are rich
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be generous with others.
Update: they have very little to give to begin with.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be generous with others.
Update: the others have a history of open generosity.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be generous with others.
Update: They themselves have nothing to give.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be generous with others.
Update: They have much more than they need.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't block people from social media for no reason.
Update: You are best friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't block people from social media for no reason.
Update: They are repeat offenders of trolling with harmful or abusive comments.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't block people from social media for no reason.
Update: Your guidelines state such.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't block people from social media for no reason.
Update: They are related to you and will spoil a birthday surprise that you posted online.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't block people from social media for no reason.
Update: They work for a charitable organization that helps many people.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't block people from social media for no reason.
Update: You're trying to do a social detox
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't block people from social media for no reason.
Update: Your social media is very impersonal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't block people from social media for no reason.
Update: The person you blocked cares a lot for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need help in parenting.
Update: You are a two-parent household with both people unemployed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need help in parenting.
Update: You are a single parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need help in parenting.
Update: Your shortcomings as a parent harm the child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need help in parenting.
Update: You're a first time parent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need help in parenting.
Update: You are a single mother with four kids.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need help in parenting.
Update: It is your first child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to need help in parenting.
Update: You have six kids
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not good to take things from your parents
Update: Your parents are starving you and you need to steal food from the kitchen in order to survive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not good to take things from your parents
Update: Your parents are old and have dementia.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not good to take things from your parents
Update: They have left the house early and you need it to pay for lunch.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not good to take things from your parents
Update: They have been good to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not good to take things from your parents
Update: Your parents are giving things away.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not good to take things from your parents
Update: Your parents have little in the way of resources.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not good to take things from your parents
Update: they want you to remove all of your old clothes from their house after you moved out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not good to take things from your parents
Update: it is not yours to take.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not good to take things from your parents
Update: you have their permission.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not good to take things from your parents
Update: they've told you not to.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be mad at your friend if they post pictures of dead people on Snapchat.
Update: It is of a cartoon character.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be mad at your friend if they post pictures of dead people on Snapchat.
Update: It is a family member of yours.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be mad at your friend if they post pictures of dead people on Snapchat.
Update: The dead people are unknown and needed to be identified.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be mad at your friend if they post pictures of dead people on Snapchat.
Update: They make fun off the dead people with sick jokes.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be mad at your friend if they post pictures of dead people on Snapchat.
Update: They are trying to solve a crime
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be mad at your friend if they post pictures of dead people on Snapchat.
Update: They know the pictures will cause you distress
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be mad at your friend if they post pictures of dead people on Snapchat.
Update: The dead people are family members they are remembering.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be mad at your friend if they post pictures of dead people on Snapchat.
Update: They are posting it without permission and the images don't belong to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset at people who abuse your money.
Update: you owed them money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset at people who abuse your money.
Update: they borrowed it from you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset at people who abuse your money.
Update: You voluntarily gave them authorization to use your credit cards and don't revoke it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset at people who abuse your money.
Update: They are being trusted to care and provide for you and you entrust them with your money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset at people who abuse your money.
Update: They're your young children and you have a responsibility to provide for them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset at people who abuse your money.
Update: They're your thirty-year-old adult children who're making no effort to find a job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset at people who abuse your money.
Update: You asked the people to spend your money how they saw fit.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset at people who abuse your money.
Update: The person was your employee.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset at people who abuse your money.
Update: You also abuse their money the same way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to get upset at people who abuse your money.
Update: You have asked them to stop abusing your money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't force your partner to choose between you and someone else.
Update: They cheated on you with that other person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't force your partner to choose between you and someone else.
Update: You know they love you and not the other person
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't force your partner to choose between you and someone else.
Update: Your partner no longer wants to be in an open relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't force your partner to choose between you and someone else.
Update: The person your partner is involved with cares for them a lot
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't force your partner to choose between you and someone else.
Update: The other person disrespects you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't force your partner to choose between you and someone else.
Update: The other person is your partner's sibling
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't force your partner to choose between you and someone else.
Update: You are already married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't force your partner to choose between you and someone else.
Update: You've just started dating.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't force your partner to choose between you and someone else.
Update: The other person is harmful and you cannot co exist with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't force your partner to choose between you and someone else.
Update: You respect their autonomy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to farm Internet points on forums.
Update: Doing so will affect other’s experience on the site
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to farm Internet points on forums.
Update: The points are meaningless in real life
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to farm Internet points on forums.
Update: It involves hate speech.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to farm Internet points on forums.
Update: You make a living selling forum profiles.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to farm Internet points on forums.
Update: You are trolling others to get those points.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to farm Internet points on forums.
Update: If you helping others with comments and humor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to farm Internet points on forums.
Update: you are cheating the system.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to farm Internet points on forums.
Update: you are one of the moderators.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to talk badly about someone else online.
Update: You are leaving a negative review for a business that ripped you off.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to talk badly about someone else online.
Update: You are an adult saying something bad about a teenager.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to talk badly about someone else online.
Update: They are talking bad about your mother
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to talk badly about someone else online.
Update: They are just a kid
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to talk badly about someone else online.
Update: They are talking badly all over the internet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to talk badly about someone else online.
Update: They are not there to defend themselves.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to talk badly about someone else online.
Update: you're both just being silly cutting each other down for laughs
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to talk badly about someone else online.
Update: You know they're doing the best they can and will be hurt by your words.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to talk badly about someone else online.
Update: You're a paid celebrity gossip reporter.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to talk badly about someone else online.
Update: You're friends with the person you're talking about.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset if your significant other doesn't buy you a Christmas gift.
Update: Your partner is very poor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset if your significant other doesn't buy you a Christmas gift.
Update: Your partner promised you a great gift.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset if your significant other doesn't buy you a Christmas gift.
Update: You agreed to not exchange gifts this year.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset if your significant other doesn't buy you a Christmas gift.
Update: You got them an expensive gift.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset if your significant other doesn't buy you a Christmas gift.
Update: Your significant other is an anticapitalist
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset if your significant other doesn't buy you a Christmas gift.
Update: You got your significant other a very expensive gift they wanted for a year
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset if your significant other doesn't buy you a Christmas gift.
Update: You're both unemployed and your budget is extremely tight.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset if your significant other doesn't buy you a Christmas gift.
Update: They recently forgot your birthday too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset if your significant other doesn't buy you a Christmas gift.
Update: You had both talked about it beforehand.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to be upset if your significant other doesn't buy you a Christmas gift.
Update: You bought them something thoughtful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be offended by a harmless phrase.
Update: The person who said it wanted it to be harmful to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't be offended by a harmless phrase.
Update: The phrase has nothing to do with you.
Update type: strengthener