tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: Being annoyed about someone doing something nice for you is selfish.
Update: You've expressed discomfort with that kind of behavior before.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Being annoyed about someone doing something nice for you is selfish.
Update: The person didn't know to anticipate your reaction.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to defend your mental health.
Update: you are incapacitated and need an advocate to defend you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to defend your mental health.
Update: Others are saying you have no issues when you know you do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to defend your mental health.
Update: There is nothing wrong with you emotionally.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to defend your mental health.
Update: You are suicidal and need help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to defend your mental health.
Update: You are too depressed to care.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to defend your mental health.
Update: You are seeing a therapist.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to defend your mental health.
Update: You are exhibiting criminal thoughts.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to defend your mental health.
Update: You are taking measures to get better.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to defend your mental health.
Update: defending your mental health is too draining.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to defend your mental health.
Update: you are susceptible to mental illness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to single out a friend and not invite them when you make plans.
Update: You know the friend will not enjoy what you plan.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to single out a friend and not invite them when you make plans.
Update: The friend is your best friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to single out a friend and not invite them when you make plans.
Update: they are working that night.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to single out a friend and not invite them when you make plans.
Update: they are the only one you don't invite.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to single out a friend and not invite them when you make plans.
Update: they are out of town.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to single out a friend and not invite them when you make plans.
Update: you value their friendship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to single out a friend and not invite them when you make plans.
Update: They have informed you that they were going on vacation and would not be available.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to single out a friend and not invite them when you make plans.
Update: They are always inviting you to come along with them when they go out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to single out a friend and not invite them when you make plans.
Update: The last few times you made plans with them they flaked out on you, and never called or apologized.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to single out a friend and not invite them when you make plans.
Update: They always include you in their plans, and you have a great time with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not talk back to your bosses.
Update: they are being abusive to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not talk back to your bosses.
Update: you really want to keep your job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not talk back to your bosses.
Update: Your boss is demanding you do something illegal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not talk back to your bosses.
Update: You know you'll get fired if you complain about regular work duties.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not talk back to your bosses.
Update: They encourage open dialogue.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not talk back to your bosses.
Update: This is your first day of work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not talk back to your bosses.
Update: You are about to quit your job and don't need another one because you won the lottery.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not talk back to your bosses.
Update: You are hoping for a promotion.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not talk back to your bosses.
Update: You have the type of relationship with them where you can speak your mind.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not talk back to your bosses.
Update: You have a tenuous relationship with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that employees do what's best for the business.
Update: They are in a profit sharing scheme
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that employees do what's best for the business.
Update: Ethics are violated in the process.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that employees do what's best for the business.
Update: It improves profits.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that employees do what's best for the business.
Update: It could harm their marriage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that employees do what's best for the business.
Update: The business could suffer from their inaction.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that employees do what's best for the business.
Update: The business uses illegal practices.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that employees do what's best for the business.
Update: The business is employee owned.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that employees do what's best for the business.
Update: they are asked to do something that is illegal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that employees do what's best for the business.
Update: they want to keep their job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to watch something that doesn't interest you.
Update: It is a work presentation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to watch something that doesn't interest you.
Update: It's the third time this week.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to watch something that doesn't interest you.
Update: You have agreed to go to a Superbowl party, even though you don't like football.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to watch something that doesn't interest you.
Update: Your kid is whining about wanting to watch yet another old episode of Barney the dinosaur.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to watch something that doesn't interest you.
Update: The professor asked the class to take notes on the documentary.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to watch something that doesn't interest you.
Update: You've seen this movie several times already.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to watch something that doesn't interest you.
Update: You work as a video editor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to watch something that doesn't interest you.
Update: You have to spend money to watch what is being shown.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to watch something that doesn't interest you.
Update: You are watching your child perform in a school play.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to watch something that doesn't interest you.
Update: You don't know anyone there.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong for a roommate to put gross dishes in front of your door rather than communicating the issue.
Update: you have failed to respond to more mature communication over dirty dishes in the past
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong for a roommate to put gross dishes in front of your door rather than communicating the issue.
Update: you are not responsible for the dirty dishes
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong for a roommate to put gross dishes in front of your door rather than communicating the issue.
Update: you have agreed to do the dishes repeatedly and failed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong for a roommate to put gross dishes in front of your door rather than communicating the issue.
Update: the roommate's responsibility is to do them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong for a roommate to put gross dishes in front of your door rather than communicating the issue.
Update: You refuse to communicate
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong for a roommate to put gross dishes in front of your door rather than communicating the issue.
Update: You do all the other chores
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong for a roommate to put gross dishes in front of your door rather than communicating the issue.
Update: They have decided to move out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong for a roommate to put gross dishes in front of your door rather than communicating the issue.
Update: There is a lot of time left on your lease.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong for a roommate to put gross dishes in front of your door rather than communicating the issue.
Update: The roommate has lost all patience after discussing this smelly dirty dishes problem multiple times.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong for a roommate to put gross dishes in front of your door rather than communicating the issue.
Update: I've ignored my commitment to them to take responsibilities for my mess.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to break up with your significant other very soon after you move in together.
Update: It is obvious you made a big mistake.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to break up with your significant other very soon after you move in together.
Update: You both agreed to try and make it work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to break up with your significant other very soon after you move in together.
Update: You caught them cheating on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to break up with your significant other very soon after you move in together.
Update: They also just gave you an expensive gift.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to break up with your significant other very soon after you move in together.
Update: They have a sudden change in personality for the worse.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to break up with your significant other very soon after you move in together.
Update: They gave up their apartment for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to break up with your significant other very soon after you move in together.
Update: You find living with them intolerable.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to break up with your significant other very soon after you move in together.
Update: You leave without a good reason or explanation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to break up with your significant other very soon after you move in together.
Update: Moving in together was a huge mistake, it would be better to end it quickly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to break up with your significant other very soon after you move in together.
Update: They signed a lease on a place they couldn't afford without your help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to use different characters in video games.
Update: You aren't any good playing with other characters.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to use different characters in video games.
Update: Someone else wants a chance to use the character you've been using.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to use different characters in video games.
Update: Your playing gta online.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to use different characters in video games.
Update: You want to experience the full game.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to use different characters in video games.
Update: there is only one option to choose from.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to use different characters in video games.
Update: they each have different strengths and weaknesses.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to use different characters in video games.
Update: There is only one good character in the game.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to use different characters in video games.
Update: You have never played the game before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to use different characters in video games.
Update: you're comfortable using the same one each time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to use different characters in video games.
Update: you want to see what the others can do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone to hurry up.
Update: The person is being purposely slow just to annoy you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone to hurry up.
Update: The person is already going as fast as they can.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone to hurry up.
Update: They are making you late for a flight
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone to hurry up.
Update: They are a slower reader than you are
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone to hurry up.
Update: You are evacuating a fire.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone to hurry up.
Update: They are giving birth.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone to hurry up.
Update: The train conductor shouted, 'all aboard,' for the final time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone to hurry up.
Update: My friend is in a self propelled wheelchair since the accident.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone to hurry up.
Update: You're experiencing an emergency.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to tell someone to hurry up.
Update: You're waiting in line for food.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we don't always see things the same way as a significant other.
Update: Your partner is explaining their expectations in a relationship with you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we don't always see things the same way as a significant other.
Update: Your significant other wants you to let them hurt you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we don't always see things the same way as a significant other.
Update: it has to do with how to raise our children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we don't always see things the same way as a significant other.
Update: it has to do with something that doesn't effect you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we don't always see things the same way as a significant other.
Update: They are trying to drive while intoxicated and you are trying to convince them otherwise.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we don't always see things the same way as a significant other.
Update: They are from a foreign country and are not used to our customs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we don't always see things the same way as a significant other.
Update: The issue is different hobbies.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we don't always see things the same way as a significant other.
Update: The issue is adultery.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we don't always see things the same way as a significant other.
Update: The disagreements are on major issues.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we don't always see things the same way as a significant other.
Update: We accept each other's different points of view.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't waste your family's money without good reason.
Update: It would cause your family to be homeless.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't waste your family's money without good reason.
Update: Your family is rich and doesn't care.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't waste your family's money without good reason.
Update: Your family struggles to make ends meet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't waste your family's money without good reason.
Update: they're going to waste it themselves, anyway
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't waste your family's money without good reason.
Update: they are poor
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't waste your family's money without good reason.
Update: you need to get rid of the money to hide a crime.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't waste your family's money without good reason.
Update: your family is struggling to pay bills.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't waste your family's money without good reason.
Update: Your family has huge debts
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect someone to respond to your message.
Update: you have sent it to the wrong contact.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect someone to respond to your message.
Update: you have marked the message as urgent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect someone to respond to your message.
Update: It is a business and they are closed when you message them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect someone to respond to your message.
Update: They are your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect someone to respond to your message.
Update: You are stalking them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect someone to respond to your message.
Update: You are a boss sending a message to an employee
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect someone to respond to your message.
Update: They are busy at work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect someone to respond to your message.
Update: It is an urgent situation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect someone to respond to your message.
Update: The person does not know who you are
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to expect someone to respond to your message.
Update: You are messaging your mother
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to change plans if necessary
Update: You have not told others about the changed plans.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to change plans if necessary
Update: The plan has been canceled and you need to change it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to change plans if necessary
Update: Others are depending on you to follow through.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to change plans if necessary
Update: There is an emergency.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to change plans if necessary
Update: you've given word to be somewhere
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to change plans if necessary
Update: unforeseeable circumstances demand it, like a natural disaster
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to change plans if necessary
Update: You made a promise to do something with someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to change plans if necessary
Update: The weather gets bad.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to change plans if necessary
Update: You have agreed to the plans a long time ago
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to change plans if necessary
Update: A serious emergency occurs
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be nice to your partner.
Update: You want the relationship to end.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be nice to your partner.
Update: You want the relationship to last for a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be nice to your partner.
Update: They did something nice for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be nice to your partner.
Update: You're getting divorced
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be nice to your partner.
Update: They are the only income earner
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be nice to your partner.
Update: Your partner is very abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be nice to your partner.
Update: Your partner takes care of you and your family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be nice to your partner.
Update: your being nice is manipulative.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be nice to your partner.
Update: you want to have a happy long term relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect fidelity in a relationship.
Update: You started the relationship while your new pardner was still married to someone else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect fidelity in a relationship.
Update: You both agree to be monogamous.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect fidelity in a relationship.
Update: Your relationship isn't really that serious.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect fidelity in a relationship.
Update: you have made a vow to each other to be loyal.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect fidelity in a relationship.
Update: You are in an open relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect fidelity in a relationship.
Update: You have agreed to be exclusive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect fidelity in a relationship.
Update: Especially if there are children born of the relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect fidelity in a relationship.
Update: The relationship is one that is non-monogamous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to expect fidelity in a relationship.
Update: The relationship is a closed monogamous one.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should make time for your partner.
Update: You are out of town helping with a sick relative.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should make time for your partner.
Update: Your partner is feeling lonely.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should make time for your partner.
Update: You would rather break up with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should make time for your partner.
Update: You haven't seen them in a while.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should make time for your partner.
Update: You live in different states.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should make time for your partner.
Update: You want to maintain a close bond.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should make time for your partner.
Update: You can't due to work responsibilities.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should make time for your partner.
Update: Your partner is sick.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should make time for your partner.
Update: You are in the middle of very important work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should make time for your partner.
Update: Your partner feels neglected.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to exclude a mentally disabled person from a game.
Update: There is a high likelihood that they will get hurt, or hurt others.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to exclude a mentally disabled person from a game.
Update: They are really their disability wouldn't impact their ability to play the game.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to exclude a mentally disabled person from a game.
Update: They are not capable of playing the game.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to exclude a mentally disabled person from a game.
Update: There is a way to include them at their own ability level.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to exclude a mentally disabled person from a game.
Update: They are the only person you are excluding.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to exclude a mentally disabled person from a game.
Update: The person does not meet the qualifications to participate.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to exclude a mentally disabled person from a game.
Update: The game is open to anyone who wants to participate.
Update type: strengthener