tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's rude to hold people accountable for accidents beyond their control.
Update: People are aware of faulty brakes and overlook it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to hold people accountable for accidents beyond their control.
Update: There was a medical emergency and the driver could not control the car.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to hold people accountable for accidents beyond their control.
Update: They had substantial prior warning of potential impending danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to hold people accountable for accidents beyond their control.
Update: They are minor children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to hold people accountable for accidents beyond their control.
Update: The person's title makes them responsible for whatever happened.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to hold people accountable for accidents beyond their control.
Update: The person didn't even know about the accident when it occurred.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always get a job to take care of yourself.
Update: You have taken a vow of poverty.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always get a job to take care of yourself.
Update: You are an adult and have no one to support you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always get a job to take care of yourself.
Update: you are disabled and cannot work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always get a job to take care of yourself.
Update: you are completely able to work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always get a job to take care of yourself.
Update: You are physically unable to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always get a job to take care of yourself.
Update: You have a family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always get a job to take care of yourself.
Update: You are mentally disabled
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always get a job to take care of yourself.
Update: You want to be successful in life
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should always get a job to take care of yourself.
Update: you're disabled.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should always get a job to take care of yourself.
Update: you are definitely able to do so.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to shave your arms for aesthetic reasons
Update: The arm hair clogs your drain.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to shave your arms for aesthetic reasons
Update: Your lover prefers your arms shaved.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to shave your arms for aesthetic reasons
Update: You feel completely comfortable with some hair on your arms.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to shave your arms for aesthetic reasons
Update: You think the hair is thick and unsightly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to shave your arms for aesthetic reasons
Update: you're trying to hide the fact that you have super hairy arms
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to shave your arms for aesthetic reasons
Update: You are very hairy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to shave your arms for aesthetic reasons
Update: you are prone to razor bumps.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to shave your arms for aesthetic reasons
Update: you are also a swimmer.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tolerate bad behavior from family members at your wedding.
Update: You know one of them is planning to propose
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tolerate bad behavior from family members at your wedding.
Update: you don't like them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tolerate bad behavior from family members at your wedding.
Update: it's not too bad
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tolerate bad behavior from family members at your wedding.
Update: they are the people paying for the wedding.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tolerate bad behavior from family members at your wedding.
Update: they are ruining your day.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tolerate bad behavior from family members at your wedding.
Update: they are part of the wedding party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tolerate bad behavior from family members at your wedding.
Update: they were not invited.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tolerate bad behavior from family members at your wedding.
Update: Its a relative and they have had too much to drink
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to tolerate bad behavior from family members at your wedding.
Update: They are ruining the wedding
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to sleep with someone a friend is attracted to.
Update: That person's sexual orientation means they'll never be interested in your friend.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to sleep with someone a friend is attracted to.
Update: You fault the fact that person chose you over your friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to sleep with someone a friend is attracted to.
Update: That friend said you could
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to sleep with someone a friend is attracted to.
Update: Your friend doesn’t get lucky as much as you do
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to sleep with someone a friend is attracted to.
Update: You already have a relationship with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to sleep with someone a friend is attracted to.
Update: She saw him first.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to sleep with someone a friend is attracted to.
Update: you yourself have strong feelings for the person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to sleep with someone a friend is attracted to.
Update: your friend has been trying to spark a relationship with them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to sleep with someone a friend is attracted to.
Update: Your friend is straight and the other person is gay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to sleep with someone a friend is attracted to.
Update: You know your friend would be upset with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be there for your friend at their wedding.
Update: You live on the other side of the country and can't afford a plane ticket.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be there for your friend at their wedding.
Update: You live in the same city.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be there for your friend at their wedding.
Update: You weren't invited to the wedding.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be there for your friend at their wedding.
Update: You are in the bridal/groom's party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be there for your friend at their wedding.
Update: You think your friend has an affair with your partner
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be there for your friend at their wedding.
Update: You are the best man
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be there for your friend at their wedding.
Update: Your friend is getting married out of the country.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be there for your friend at their wedding.
Update: Your friend is getting married close to where you live.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be there for your friend at their wedding.
Update: They are marrying your ex.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be there for your friend at their wedding.
Update: They asked you to be in it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be honest with your sexual partners about your fantasies.
Update: You know they would find the fantasies frightening.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be honest with your sexual partners about your fantasies.
Update: You think they might enjoy the fantasies too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be honest with your sexual partners about your fantasies.
Update: the fantasies involve children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be honest with your sexual partners about your fantasies.
Update: you want to be compatible with your sexual partners.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be honest with your sexual partners about your fantasies.
Update: You are just getting to know them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be honest with your sexual partners about your fantasies.
Update: You ever want to live out those fantasies.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say hurtful things towards a family members girlfriend.
Update: The girlfriend was found hurting your family member.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say hurtful things towards a family members girlfriend.
Update: You dislike her because of her race.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say hurtful things towards a family members girlfriend.
Update: Their girlfriend is cheating
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say hurtful things towards a family members girlfriend.
Update: They are going to get married
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say hurtful things towards a family members girlfriend.
Update: You just met her.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say hurtful things towards a family members girlfriend.
Update: She says hurtful things to your mother.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say hurtful things towards a family members girlfriend.
Update: She has brought flowers and wine for the host.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say hurtful things towards a family members girlfriend.
Update: she is being rude to you first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say hurtful things towards a family members girlfriend.
Update: she did nothing to deserve it anyways.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: You pay all the rent and utilities
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: They split the rent with you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: he likes to be controlled.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: he respects your autonomy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: It is an emergency situation and they are panicking.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: You are the one subletting from them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: You are telling them to do their half of the chores.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: You don't know them that well or understand their situation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: They keep leaving their stuff all over the counters.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your roommate what to do.
Update: They give you your space.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to cut ties with exes.
Update: you're both single and want to reconcile.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to cut ties with exes.
Update: they're toxic to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to cut ties with exes.
Update: They want to remain friends
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to cut ties with exes.
Update: Your current partner doesn’t want you to be friends with them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to cut ties with exes.
Update: you want to get back together
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to cut ties with exes.
Update: you want to find your true love
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to cut ties with exes.
Update: You share custody of minor offspring.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to cut ties with exes.
Update: You hate each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to cut ties with exes.
Update: you have shared custody of your children with them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to cut ties with exes.
Update: the exes have been abusive in the past
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to know what your children do on their computer.
Update: Your child is an adult now.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to know what your children do on their computer.
Update: Your child is in online chat rooms.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to know what your children do on their computer.
Update: They are adults.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to know what your children do on their computer.
Update: They are do young to understand how someone can deceive them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to know what your children do on their computer.
Update: You are invading their privacy by reading their messages to friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to know what your children do on their computer.
Update: You want to protect the computer from viruses.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to know what your children do on their computer.
Update: they are adults.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to know what your children do on their computer.
Update: the computer does not have parental controls.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to know what your children do on their computer.
Update: They are learning computer programming.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to know what your children do on their computer.
Update: They visit chat rooms with adults.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to work for Uber.
Update: You need a job right now
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to work for Uber.
Update: They don’t pay their drivers well
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to work for Uber.
Update: you want to make money driving.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to work for Uber.
Update: you don't have a personal car.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to work for Uber.
Update: It's the only job in town and you need money to pay your bills.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to work for Uber.
Update: You don't like driving much and are not very social.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to work for Uber.
Update: you are desperate for cash
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to work for Uber.
Update: you have a better job offer
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to work for Uber.
Update: You are the CEO of Uber.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to work for Uber.
Update: You already work for Lyft.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to communicate your sexual desires to your significant other.
Update: You know that some of your desires your partner has major issues with and would make them very uncomfortable.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to communicate your sexual desires to your significant other.
Update: You want your partner to know who you really are and you want to be happy in the relationship and let it grow in a healthy way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to communicate your sexual desires to your significant other.
Update: They have already rejected your ideas.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to communicate your sexual desires to your significant other.
Update: You want a healthy relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to communicate your sexual desires to your significant other.
Update: You know that they would take them the wrong way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to communicate your sexual desires to your significant other.
Update: You want to build your relationship on trust.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to communicate your sexual desires to your significant other.
Update: You don't listen to what they want.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to communicate your sexual desires to your significant other.
Update: You also ask what they want.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone else a slut.
Update: It is during sex and that is their kink.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone else a slut.
Update: They are a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone else a slut.
Update: They sleep with your partner
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone else a slut.
Update: They are just out and having fun
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone else a slut.
Update: they are verbally abusing you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call someone else a slut.
Update: they are chaste and innocent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to shun family members when they want to spend time with you.
Update: they are pedophiles
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to shun family members when they want to spend time with you.
Update: they are supportive and loving
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to shun family members when they want to spend time with you.
Update: You can't stand the family members.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to shun family members when they want to spend time with you.
Update: They haven't seen you in a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to shun family members when they want to spend time with you.
Update: They refuse to meet your boyfriend of 10 years.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to shun family members when they want to spend time with you.
Update: You are shunning them over something you did and are embarrassed about.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to shun family members when they want to spend time with you.
Update: those family members are always standing you up or asking you for money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to shun family members when they want to spend time with you.
Update: they have always invited and included you in their activities.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to shun family members when they want to spend time with you.
Update: They keep talking about your personal life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to shun family members when they want to spend time with you.
Update: They are elderly and very sick.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let money ruin your relationships.
Update: Your partner is making you financially unstable.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let money ruin your relationships.
Update: You and your partner aren't struggling when it comes to money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let money ruin your relationships.
Update: the disagreements about money are really due to a bigger underlying problem such as excessive control or lack of trust.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let money ruin your relationships.
Update: you have open communication and can establish some ground rules for spending and saving.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let money ruin your relationships.
Update: someone has stolen money from you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let money ruin your relationships.
Update: it's over $5.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let money ruin your relationships.
Update: Unless your partner is wasting your money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let money ruin your relationships.
Update: Especially if your partner is responsible with money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let money ruin your relationships.
Update: Someone stole from you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let money ruin your relationships.
Update: The amount of money is very small and you can afford it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't keep in contact with your ex's.
Update: They're very good friends or you might want to get back together with them at some point.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't keep in contact with your ex's.
Update: You've moved on to a new relationship and want your new partner to feel secure.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't keep in contact with your ex's.
Update: you're friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't keep in contact with your ex's.
Update: you had a huge fight with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't keep in contact with your ex's.
Update: You were always better as friends than boyfriends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't keep in contact with your ex's.
Update: Your husband has made it a point to ask you not to talk to your ex anymore
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't keep in contact with your ex's.
Update: You both enjoy spending time together doing platonic exercises.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't keep in contact with your ex's.
Update: You get into a screaming argument every time you see each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't keep in contact with your ex's.
Update: you see them all the time anyway.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't keep in contact with your ex's.
Update: they were abusive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include those you care about in your life.
Update: those people have proved to be untrustworthy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include those you care about in your life.
Update: they include you in their lives.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include those you care about in your life.
Update: they are not being supportive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include those you care about in your life.
Update: you have mental issues.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include those you care about in your life.
Update: They don't want to be included.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include those you care about in your life.
Update: You told them you would include them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include those you care about in your life.
Update: you are in a country far away.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include those you care about in your life.
Update: if they want you to include too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include those you care about in your life.
Update: You know they are busy working on themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to not include those you care about in your life.
Update: They called you wanting to reconnect.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people will want to celebrate on their birthday.
Update: they're older
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people will want to celebrate on their birthday.
Update: they're a little kid
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people will want to celebrate on their birthday.
Update: They are sick.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people will want to celebrate on their birthday.
Update: They are turning a milestone birthday, like 21.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people will want to celebrate on their birthday.
Update: their religion does not recognize birthdays.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people will want to celebrate on their birthday.
Update: they are young children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people will want to celebrate on their birthday.
Update: they're not the type of person that likes to celebrate.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that people will want to celebrate on their birthday.
Update: they've always celebrated in the past.
Update type: strengthener