tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell someone one thing and then go back on that and ignore the person.
Update: They are having an affair with your wife.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell someone one thing and then go back on that and ignore the person.
Update: That person is a good friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell someone one thing and then go back on that and ignore the person.
Update: You're trying to evade arrest.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell someone one thing and then go back on that and ignore the person.
Update: You want to remain friends with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's sad that society doesn't have protection for freelance workers.
Update: The freelance workers often make more than any other workers.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's sad that society doesn't have protection for freelance workers.
Update: The freelance workers carry a heavy tax burden.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's sad that society doesn't have protection for freelance workers.
Update: they don't have to get a traditional 9 to 5.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's sad that society doesn't have protection for freelance workers.
Update: they work just as hard as anyone else.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's sad that society doesn't have protection for freelance workers.
Update: We have the ability to say no to any job we don't want to do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's sad that society doesn't have protection for freelance workers.
Update: there is a monopoly that allows for an environment of abuse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's sad that society doesn't have protection for freelance workers.
Update: They are paid extremely well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's sad that society doesn't have protection for freelance workers.
Update: The work they do is dangerous.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's sad that society doesn't have protection for freelance workers.
Update: They are citizens.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to expect someone to take responsibility and show up for events they were expected to.
Update: they are caught in something beyond their control, like traffic or delayed flights
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to expect someone to take responsibility and show up for events they were expected to.
Update: they knew about the events for quite some time
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to expect someone to take responsibility and show up for events they were expected to.
Update: an emergency comes up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to expect someone to take responsibility and show up for events they were expected to.
Update: they promised they would be there.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to expect someone to take responsibility and show up for events they were expected to.
Update: an emergency came up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to expect someone to take responsibility and show up for events they were expected to.
Update: they didn't have a good excuse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to expect someone to take responsibility and show up for events they were expected to.
Update: they are going through a tough time and need to be alone
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to expect someone to take responsibility and show up for events they were expected to.
Update: they have plenty of free time to be at events
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to expect someone to take responsibility and show up for events they were expected to.
Update: You know they are very ill.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to expect someone to take responsibility and show up for events they were expected to.
Update: they made a promise to show up and have no reason not to.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad behavior to snitch on people.
Update: It is for your own safety.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad behavior to snitch on people.
Update: It incriminates you too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad behavior to snitch on people.
Update: someone is doing something dangerous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad behavior to snitch on people.
Update: you don't want to be called a tattle tail.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad behavior to snitch on people.
Update: It is for a murder investigation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad behavior to snitch on people.
Update: You're counting on the other person to not snitch on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad behavior to snitch on people.
Update: it helps keep someone safe.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad behavior to snitch on people.
Update: they have not snitched on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad behavior to snitch on people.
Update: You are bringing down a heinous crime ring of pedophiles.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad behavior to snitch on people.
Update: You have a non disclosure agreement.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to help out your spouse financially.
Update: you've agreed to keep finances separate
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to help out your spouse financially.
Update: they've been having a hard time financially
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to help out your spouse financially.
Update: Your spouse is abusing your help
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to help out your spouse financially.
Update: Ypur spouse honestly needs it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to help out your spouse financially.
Update: you are incapacitated and have no way to help them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to help out your spouse financially.
Update: you are able-bodied and capable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to help out your spouse financially.
Update: You have been laid off.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to help out your spouse financially.
Update: They were laid off.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to help out your spouse financially.
Update: Your spouse make significantly more money than you do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to help out your spouse financially.
Update: Your spouse is disabled and unable to work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to quit a job when they are understaffed.
Update: You have another job lined up that is far better.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to quit a job when they are understaffed.
Update: It is a small family owned business.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to quit a job when they are understaffed.
Update: you have a better paying offer.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to quit a job when they are understaffed.
Update: you are the manager.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to quit a job when they are understaffed.
Update: they have mistreated you very badly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to quit a job when they are understaffed.
Update: they have been good to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to quit a job when they are understaffed.
Update: you are working in a hostile environment.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to quit a job when they are understaffed.
Update: your co workers and bosses have treated you well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to quit a job when they are understaffed.
Update: They are abusive towards their staff.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to quit a job when they are understaffed.
Update: You promised to wait for a replacement.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is polite to respect when somebody calls dibs on something.
Update: You are physically disabled and need to sit shotgun.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is polite to respect when somebody calls dibs on something.
Update: They called dibs long before you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is polite to respect when somebody calls dibs on something.
Update: you had already called dibs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is polite to respect when somebody calls dibs on something.
Update: you know it's something they really like.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is polite to respect when somebody calls dibs on something.
Update: You paid for the entire thing yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is polite to respect when somebody calls dibs on something.
Update: You want to play fairly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is polite to respect when somebody calls dibs on something.
Update: It was suppose to go to you anyway.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is polite to respect when somebody calls dibs on something.
Update: You respect the rules of the dibs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is polite to respect when somebody calls dibs on something.
Update: The items belong to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is polite to respect when somebody calls dibs on something.
Update: You had your fair share.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: I'ts immoral to get in between people in a romantic relationship.
Update: they are in an open relationship and court you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: I'ts immoral to get in between people in a romantic relationship.
Update: they're in a monogamous relatinship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: I'ts immoral to get in between people in a romantic relationship.
Update: You are providing a good reason for the people not to be in a romantic relationship
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: I'ts immoral to get in between people in a romantic relationship.
Update: You are getting involved for reason that is selfish
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: I'ts immoral to get in between people in a romantic relationship.
Update: one of the people is in serious danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: I'ts immoral to get in between people in a romantic relationship.
Update: the relationship is going very well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: I'ts immoral to get in between people in a romantic relationship.
Update: The two people are trying to kill each other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: I'ts immoral to get in between people in a romantic relationship.
Update: The two people love each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: I'ts immoral to get in between people in a romantic relationship.
Update: you value your friendships.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should do what you can to not present yourself as someone who is scary.
Update: you are working in a haunted house.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should do what you can to not present yourself as someone who is scary.
Update: want to look nice for  your blind date.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should do what you can to not present yourself as someone who is scary.
Update: You are trying to intimidate people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should do what you can to not present yourself as someone who is scary.
Update: You're trying to appeal to children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should do what you can to not present yourself as someone who is scary.
Update: it is halloween and calls for it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should do what you can to not present yourself as someone who is scary.
Update: you want to make other people comfortable
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should do what you can to not present yourself as someone who is scary.
Update: You work in a haunted house.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should do what you can to not present yourself as someone who is scary.
Update: You work around children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should do what you can to not present yourself as someone who is scary.
Update: you need to intimidate people for good reasons.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should do what you can to not present yourself as someone who is scary.
Update: you are working with children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Family is expected to keep in contact.
Update: Unless they are victims of domestic violence.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Family is expected to keep in contact.
Update: The family members live nearby each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Family is expected to keep in contact.
Update: There is a pattern of abuse in the family.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Family is expected to keep in contact.
Update: The family members must be apart for a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Family is expected to keep in contact.
Update: Your family is toxic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Family is expected to keep in contact.
Update: You are all trying to take care of an elderly relative.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Family is expected to keep in contact.
Update: One person has cut off contact.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Family is expected to keep in contact.
Update: they want to stay close.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Family is expected to keep in contact.
Update: It's only for a short vacation to get away from everything and relax.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Family is expected to keep in contact.
Update: A family member is near death or in the hospital.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to demand your spouse do something.
Update: You have a give and take relationship and things are expected of each of you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to demand your spouse do something.
Update: You use a loud angry voice to tell them to do something
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to demand your spouse do something.
Update: Your child is choking.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to demand your spouse do something.
Update: They ask you politely to do things.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to demand your spouse do something.
Update: It's for your child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to demand your spouse do something.
Update: Your spouse is sick.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to demand your spouse do something.
Update: They are endangering your children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to demand your spouse do something.
Update: You want to be in a healthy relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to demand your spouse do something.
Update: they keep forgetting to do it and you are doing everything else.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to demand your spouse do something.
Update: you work together on things.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: the person is being mean to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: you're dealing with a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: people are using that to take advantage of you too much.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: people are very kind to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: Someone is defrauding you when you give them gifts.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: You are living rent-free in someone's home.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: That kindness lets people step all over you because you are too nice
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: People will be kind to you back
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: Being kind means fueling people's bad habits.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: You are a goo dperson.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to share your first kiss with a friend if you're in a relationship with someone else.
Update: You are in the process of breaking up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to share your first kiss with a friend if you're in a relationship with someone else.
Update: You are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to share your first kiss with a friend if you're in a relationship with someone else.
Update: you've been in your relationship for a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to share your first kiss with a friend if you're in a relationship with someone else.
Update: It's just a friendly kiss to practice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to share your first kiss with a friend if you're in a relationship with someone else.
Update: You really like the person you're in a relationship with.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to share your first kiss with a friend if you're in a relationship with someone else.
Update: this has been agreed upon before then.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to share your first kiss with a friend if you're in a relationship with someone else.
Update: you care about your friend and your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to share your first kiss with a friend if you're in a relationship with someone else.
Update: Everyone is in agreement in the situation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to share your first kiss with a friend if you're in a relationship with someone else.
Update: The person you're in a relationship with has asked you to only kiss them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to make life choices your parents might not agree with.
Update: they are paying all of your bills.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to make life choices your parents might not agree with.
Update: you have been supporting yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to make life choices your parents might not agree with.
Update: You are under age and still live with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to make life choices your parents might not agree with.
Update: You are over age 18 and live on your own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to make life choices your parents might not agree with.
Update: Those choices involve drugs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to make life choices your parents might not agree with.
Update: Those choices involve your career.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to make life choices your parents might not agree with.
Update: Those choices can cause you to die
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to make life choices your parents might not agree with.
Update: You are not doing anything dangerous or morally unacceptable
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to make life choices your parents might not agree with.
Update: your life choices are to do crimes.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to make life choices your parents might not agree with.
Update: you have different values than your parents.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be annoyed by your partner when they are helping you.
Update: they are being condescending.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be annoyed by your partner when they are helping you.
Update: they are just trying to help you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be annoyed by your partner when they are helping you.
Update: The help is doing more harm than good.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be annoyed by your partner when they are helping you.
Update: They are giving something up to help you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be annoyed by your partner when they are helping you.
Update: You have already told them to not help you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be annoyed by your partner when they are helping you.
Update: Have not made it clear that you do not want their help at all
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be annoyed by your partner when they are helping you.
Update: Your partner is less knowlegdeable than you are.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be annoyed by your partner when they are helping you.
Update: Your partner is familiar with the solution.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be annoyed by your partner when they are helping you.
Update: They turned on the blender without the top.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to be annoyed by your partner when they are helping you.
Update: It is your anniversary.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should not expect others to give them money for nothing.
Update: they won the money in a contest.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should not expect others to give them money for nothing.
Update: they never worked for it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should not expect others to give them money for nothing.
Update: They are working for a charity.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should not expect others to give them money for nothing.
Update: They have asked too many times for help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should not expect others to give them money for nothing.
Update: they are panhandling.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should not expect others to give them money for nothing.
Update: they have not done anything to earn it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should not expect others to give them money for nothing.
Update: They are returning money they borrowed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should not expect others to give them money for nothing.
Update: They don't want a job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should not expect others to give them money for nothing.
Update: They are expecting an inheritance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should not expect others to give them money for nothing.
Update: They are not working.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to misunderstand something.
Update: It is the instructions for medication.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to misunderstand something.
Update: Something is written poorly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to misunderstand something.
Update: unless the misunderstanding can get you fired for failing to carry out instructions properly
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to misunderstand something.
Update: the misunderstanding helps you understand people you communicate better with people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to misunderstand something.
Update: you won't admit your mistake.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to misunderstand something.
Update: it was a common error lots of people make.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to misunderstand something.
Update: You are very knowledgeable on the subject.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to misunderstand something.
Update: You are new to the subject.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to misunderstand something.
Update: the reason you did so is because you weren't paying attention.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to misunderstand something.
Update: the person doesn't speak your language.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to revoke your offer.
Update: Thry other party broke the contract.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to revoke your offer.
Update: You have a binding contract.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to revoke your offer.
Update: the terms of the agreement have changed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to revoke your offer.
Update: you shook their hand in agreement.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to revoke your offer.
Update: Mistakes were made in your calculations.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to revoke your offer.
Update: The buyer has already paid for your services.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to revoke your offer.
Update: you've made it clear that you reserve the right to do so
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to revoke your offer.
Update: you've made it clear that you are committing to the offer
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to revoke your offer.
Update: the terms have been violated.
Update type: weakener