tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is okay to not speak to people who have wronged you.
Update: You like to maintain healthy boundaries.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not speak to people who have wronged you.
Update: They have apologized profusely.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to not speak to people who have wronged you.
Update: They have not apologized to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to want to monopolize all of someone's time that we care about.
Update: It is for a short time and one of you is moving away.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to want to monopolize all of someone's time that we care about.
Update: They want to spend time with other friends, too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to want to monopolize all of someone's time that we care about.
Update: They are dying.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to want to monopolize all of someone's time that we care about.
Update: They have other things to do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to want to monopolize all of someone's time that we care about.
Update: They are introverted
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to want to monopolize all of someone's time that we care about.
Update: they are visiting for the afternoon.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to want to monopolize all of someone's time that we care about.
Update: they are interested in seeing everyone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to want to monopolize all of someone's time that we care about.
Update: You're trying to keep that person from hurting themself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to want to monopolize all of someone's time that we care about.
Update: That person is your partner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset if someone at work has an unfair advantage because they slept with a boss.
Update: This person can fire you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset if someone at work has an unfair advantage because they slept with a boss.
Update: The boss is your spouse.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset if someone at work has an unfair advantage because they slept with a boss.
Update: You did the same thing to get ahead
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset if someone at work has an unfair advantage because they slept with a boss.
Update: They got a promotion you were expecting
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset if someone at work has an unfair advantage because they slept with a boss.
Update: They are being promoted because of it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset if someone at work has an unfair advantage because they slept with a boss.
Update: You also slept with the boss.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset if someone at work has an unfair advantage because they slept with a boss.
Update: They got promoted when you have better qualifications.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset if someone at work has an unfair advantage because they slept with a boss.
Update: it violates company policy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset if someone at work has an unfair advantage because they slept with a boss.
Update: your bonus is at stake.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to have nude photos.
Update: You live in a sexually liberated community.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to have nude photos.
Update: They're photos of a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to have nude photos.
Update: You are in a consenting relationship with another adult.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to have nude photos.
Update: You hacked someone's cloud account.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to have nude photos.
Update: You are a model for an artist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to have nude photos.
Update: You have been put on a predator list.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to have nude photos.
Update: You're a professional sex worker.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's frowned upon to have nude photos.
Update: You're sending them as a valentines gift.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to split a bill.
Update: They paid for you last time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to split a bill.
Update: You ordered different amounts of food.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to split a bill.
Update: The person you're with is unemployed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to split a bill.
Update: The person you're with makes about as much money as you do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to split a bill.
Update: You promised to pay for the whole meal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to split a bill.
Update: You're out with coworkers.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to split a bill.
Update: The meal was complimentary to start with.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to split a bill.
Update: Everyone ate the same thing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to split a bill.
Update: you are on a date.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to split a bill.
Update: you are short on money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should protect your family, even from other family members who are toxic.
Update: You know they could be harmed by those family members.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should protect your family, even from other family members who are toxic.
Update: You are a baby.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should protect your family, even from other family members who are toxic.
Update: You are responsible for the household.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should protect your family, even from other family members who are toxic.
Update: You need to be away from your family to be okay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should protect your family, even from other family members who are toxic.
Update: You have guardianship of the family needing protection.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should protect your family, even from other family members who are toxic.
Update: You are in an emergency and have no other options.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should protect your family, even from other family members who are toxic.
Update: Those family members have hurt you or your family before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should protect your family, even from other family members who are toxic.
Update: Most doctors and therapists disagree with you about who's toxic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should protect your family, even from other family members who are toxic.
Update: Those family members are too timid to stand up for themselves.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to withhold important information.
Update: You are telling a white lie
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to withhold important information.
Update: Money is at stake
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to withhold important information.
Update: It will keep you out of jail.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to withhold important information.
Update: It will help others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to withhold important information.
Update: that person is a minor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to withhold important information.
Update: it is a matter of life or death.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to withhold important information.
Update: Telling the person would cause them great pain.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to withhold important information.
Update: That information is about an important upcoming deadline.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to withhold important information.
Update: You don't want to hurt someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not okay to withhold important information.
Update: Someone is making a big life decision.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't make fun of other's ideas.
Update: the person is sensitive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't make fun of other's ideas.
Update: The ideas you're making fun of have been stole nfrom you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't make fun of other's ideas.
Update: You're at an open mic night.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't make fun of other's ideas.
Update: They are already making fun of the ideas and you're just having fun together.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't make fun of other's ideas.
Update: You know they are serious about their ideas.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't make fun of other's ideas.
Update: They have tried the same idea and failed
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't make fun of other's ideas.
Update: They are just starting out in the field
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't make fun of other's ideas.
Update: You are joking around with your friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't make fun of other's ideas.
Update: The ideas are expressed in a business meeting.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do things that upset your partner.
Update: Your partner is upset over trivial things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do things that upset your partner.
Update: Your partner has asked you to avoid doing some things that are distressing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do things that upset your partner.
Update: your partner is unrealistic about things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do things that upset your partner.
Update: your partner tries to always be nice to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do things that upset your partner.
Update: You are divorcing your partner after they cheated on you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do things that upset your partner.
Update: The things you do are violent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do things that upset your partner.
Update: Your partner gets upset by unreasonable things, like you having a business lunch with someone of the opposite gender.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do things that upset your partner.
Update: You go out of your way to irritate them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do things that upset your partner.
Update: You are physically or mentally defending yourself or your values.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to do things that upset your partner.
Update: They have just lost a loved one.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to buy gifts for a family member's birthday.
Update: You are experiencing a financial hardship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to buy gifts for a family member's birthday.
Update: They have given you gifts for your own birthday.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to buy gifts for a family member's birthday.
Update: The family member requests no gifts.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to buy gifts for a family member's birthday.
Update: You are guests at their birthday party.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to buy gifts for a family member's birthday.
Update: You're very poor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to buy gifts for a family member's birthday.
Update: The person has asked for small cheap gifts.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to buy gifts for a family member's birthday.
Update: You have been estranged for years.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to buy gifts for a family member's birthday.
Update: They are children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to buy gifts for a family member's birthday.
Update: You have recently lost your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to buy gifts for a family member's birthday.
Update: You always exchange birthday gifts with family members.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad for you addiction to bother the people you live with.
Update: They also have the same addiction
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad for you addiction to bother the people you live with.
Update: Your addiction involves drug dealers coming over
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad for you addiction to bother the people you live with.
Update: it is causing danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad for you addiction to bother the people you live with.
Update: they are trying to stop you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad for you addiction to bother the people you live with.
Update: The addiction is used to show that having an addiction is bad to others to see.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad for you addiction to bother the people you live with.
Update: Your addiction is a bothersome and costly for others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad for you addiction to bother the people you live with.
Update: They are responsible for starting you on it in the first place.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad for you addiction to bother the people you live with.
Update: You're a cigarette smoker.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad for you addiction to bother the people you live with.
Update: Your addiction is to something minor like coffee.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad for you addiction to bother the people you live with.
Update: Your addiction is to something major like cocaine.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Parents should send their children to school to get a proper education.
Update: One of them can provide a better education through homeschooling.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Parents should send their children to school to get a proper education.
Update: The local school is very highly rated.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Parents should send their children to school to get a proper education.
Update: The parent is capable of homeschooling them better than public school.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Parents should send their children to school to get a proper education.
Update: They want their child to be successful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Parents should send their children to school to get a proper education.
Update: They have chosen to home-school.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Parents should send their children to school to get a proper education.
Update: The child wants to become a doctor when they get older.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Parents should send their children to school to get a proper education.
Update: The parents are home schooling their children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Parents should send their children to school to get a proper education.
Update: The children have been absent for a while.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Parents should send their children to school to get a proper education.
Update: Parents know the local schools are violent and harsh and feel educating their kids at home would be healthier.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Parents should send their children to school to get a proper education.
Update: They wish to raise good, law-abiding citizens who contribute to society.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hurt your significant other.
Update: they are abusing you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hurt your significant other.
Update: you want to stay married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hurt your significant other.
Update: You hurt them by getting away from them if they are dangerous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hurt your significant other.
Update: It isn't necessary and you care about them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hurt your significant other.
Update: You are defending your own life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hurt your significant other.
Update: They are the one you love.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hurt your significant other.
Update: They ask you to wax their back.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hurt your significant other.
Update: You want to maintain a healthy relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hurt your significant other.
Update: Your significant other has hurt you or your child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't hurt your significant other.
Update: Your significant other is bedbound and ill.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be hurt after losing a pet.
Update: The pet killed another human.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be hurt after losing a pet.
Update: The pet was your first pet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be hurt after losing a pet.
Update: The pet killed somebody.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be hurt after losing a pet.
Update: You've had the pet for 10 years.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be hurt after losing a pet.
Update: you were the cause of the pet going away.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be hurt after losing a pet.
Update: you found the pet dead outside.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be hurt after losing a pet.
Update: The pet was taken from you by animal control.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be hurt after losing a pet.
Update: It was a loving member of your family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is acceptable to be hurt after losing a pet.
Update: You had them since they were a baby.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's perfectly fine to cut relatives out of your life that you don't like
Update: It is a relative that has been good and supportive to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's perfectly fine to cut relatives out of your life that you don't like
Update: The relative have taken advantage of you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's perfectly fine to cut relatives out of your life that you don't like
Update: Those relatives are responsible for taking care of you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's perfectly fine to cut relatives out of your life that you don't like
Update: Those relatives hurt you physically.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's perfectly fine to cut relatives out of your life that you don't like
Update: they are rich and you are in their will.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's perfectly fine to cut relatives out of your life that you don't like
Update: their behavior is toxic.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's perfectly fine to cut relatives out of your life that you don't like
Update: That person is your child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's perfectly fine to cut relatives out of your life that you don't like
Update: They have been abusive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's perfectly fine to cut relatives out of your life that you don't like
Update: It is your young child that you are responsible to care for.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's perfectly fine to cut relatives out of your life that you don't like
Update: It is a distant relative that you don't see often.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't butt your nose into your parent's relationships.
Update: They ask for advice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't butt your nose into your parent's relationships.
Update: They have asked you to mind your business.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't butt your nose into your parent's relationships.
Update: You are trying to prevent them from being scammed
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't butt your nose into your parent's relationships.
Update: You don't know all of the details of the relationship
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't butt your nose into your parent's relationships.
Update: Your parents relationship is affecting you personally.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't butt your nose into your parent's relationships.
Update: Your parents don't live anywhere near you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't butt your nose into your parent's relationships.
Update: They are hurting themselves
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't butt your nose into your parent's relationships.
Update: They are mature
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't butt your nose into your parent's relationships.
Update: It will have an affect on your home life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't butt your nose into your parent's relationships.
Update: It will not change anything for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful what you show to kids.
Update: They suffer from PTSD.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful what you show to kids.
Update: You're at a children's museum where all the exhibits are pre-vetted.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful what you show to kids.
Update: You're in the adult section of the public library.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful what you show to kids.
Update: You're a teacher
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful what you show to kids.
Update: The children are five
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful what you show to kids.
Update: The parents are free reign and don't shelter their kids.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful what you show to kids.
Update: They are young and the content is inappropriate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be careful what you show to kids.
Update: They need to learn it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be careful what you show to kids.
Update: They are too young to view it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to judge other's diets.
Update: They are forcing you to eat what they eat.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to judge other's diets.
Update: They are healthy and happy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to judge other's diets.
Update: You are on the same diet.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to judge other's diets.
Update: You are the one who told others to go on diets.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to judge other's diets.
Update: You are a nutritionist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to judge other's diets.
Update: You eat fast food.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to judge other's diets.
Update: The other person has an eating disorder
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to judge other's diets.
Update: You don't tell anyone how you feel.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to judge other's diets.
Update: You gossip with others about it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be concerned about your children being exposed online.
Update: your children are adults and they can handle their own affairs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be concerned about your children being exposed online.
Update: your children are very young and not very responsible.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be concerned about your children being exposed online.
Update: They are free to use the internet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be concerned about your children being exposed online.
Update: They have frequent access to the internet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be concerned about your children being exposed online.
Update: they are Youtube stars.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be concerned about your children being exposed online.
Update: they are being stalked.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be concerned about your children being exposed online.
Update: You are teaching them a valuble lesson
Update type: weakener