tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to go somewhere you don't think you would enjoy.
Update: it's a situation that makes you uncomfrotable
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to go somewhere you don't think you would enjoy.
Update: It is to the funeral of a family member.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to go somewhere you don't think you would enjoy.
Update: Your enemy from work is going to be there.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to go somewhere you don't think you would enjoy.
Update: The place you don't want to go is to the hospital for a life saving procedure.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to go somewhere you don't think you would enjoy.
Update: The place you don't want to go is the movies.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to go somewhere you don't think you would enjoy.
Update: Your partner wants to go there
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not want to go somewhere you don't think you would enjoy.
Update: You don’t want to waste your money
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let social media get in the way of friendships.
Update: Someone dissed you publically.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let social media get in the way of friendships.
Update: You've known someone for a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let social media get in the way of friendships.
Update: Your friend is trashing you on social media.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let social media get in the way of friendships.
Update: What you are reading is all here say.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let social media get in the way of friendships.
Update: Your friend is posting cruel images of you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let social media get in the way of friendships.
Update: You're good friends whenever you talk offline.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let social media get in the way of friendships.
Update: You're addicted to social media.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let social media get in the way of friendships.
Update: they are posting lies about you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't let social media get in the way of friendships.
Update: you care too much about likes.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not be friends with someone forever.
Update: you both get along.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not be friends with someone forever.
Update: you both dont get along
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not be friends with someone forever.
Update: It is possible to make up with them over time
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not be friends with someone forever.
Update: You move away from each other
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not be friends with someone forever.
Update: You are married to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not be friends with someone forever.
Update: You move away.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not be friends with someone forever.
Update: The person is mean to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to not be friends with someone forever.
Update: They have broken your trust.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to force your partner to do anything.
Update: Your partner enjoys roleplay with force.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to force your partner to do anything.
Update: Your partner is sensitive to manipulation and coercion
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to force your partner to do anything.
Update: You're forcing them to give you the gun instead of shooting themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to force your partner to do anything.
Update: You're forcing them to have sex.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to force your partner to do anything.
Update: they're refusing to take their life saving medication
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to force your partner to do anything.
Update: your partner has strict personal boundaries
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to force your partner to do anything.
Update: it is an emergency and you need them to take you to the hospital.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to force your partner to do anything.
Update: They have already told you no.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to force your partner to do anything.
Update: They are refusing to take life saving medication.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to force your partner to do anything.
Update: They repeatedly tell you no.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to stay in a job you don't like.
Update: You will have trouble finding another job quickly
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to stay in a job you don't like.
Update: You are depressed
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to stay in a job you don't like.
Update: You have bills to pay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to stay in a job you don't like.
Update: You have other offers.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to stay in a job you don't like.
Update: You need the money to pay bills.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to stay in a job you don't like.
Update: You have a better job that just hired you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to stay in a job you don't like.
Update: The job is taking a toll on your body.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to stay in a job you don't like.
Update: you like to eat.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to stay in a job you don't like.
Update: you have another job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that couples will attend each others work events together.
Update: They cannot get a babysitter.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that couples will attend each others work events together.
Update: Neither has to work and they can get a babysitter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that couples will attend each others work events together.
Update: They're both scheduled to occur at the same time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that couples will attend each others work events together.
Update: You want to be supportive of your significant other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that couples will attend each others work events together.
Update: The work events happen at the same time of day
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that couples will attend each others work events together.
Update: They work for the same company
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that couples will attend each others work events together.
Update: The work events discourage non-employees from attending.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that couples will attend each others work events together.
Update: They work for the same company.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that couples will attend each others work events together.
Update: they have to work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that couples will attend each others work events together.
Update: they want to be supportive of each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be unsupportive to your spouse who has been laid-off.
Update: They've been laid off for years.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be unsupportive to your spouse who has been laid-off.
Update: They are not dealing with it very well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be unsupportive to your spouse who has been laid-off.
Update: They were laid off for doing something intentionally.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be unsupportive to your spouse who has been laid-off.
Update: The lay offs were company wide.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be unsupportive to your spouse who has been laid-off.
Update: They start coming home drunk every night and blaming you for they lay off.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be unsupportive to your spouse who has been laid-off.
Update: They are taking it really hard and slipping into a depression.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be unsupportive to your spouse who has been laid-off.
Update: Your spouse is laying around and not finding another job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be unsupportive to your spouse who has been laid-off.
Update: Your spouse was a good employee.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be unsupportive to your spouse who has been laid-off.
Update: you really needed them to have income.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to be unsupportive to your spouse who has been laid-off.
Update: they hated the job because the people there were bullying them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be uncomfortable discussing personal medical issues.
Update: You are with your doctor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be uncomfortable discussing personal medical issues.
Update: You are talking to a crowd.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be uncomfortable discussing personal medical issues.
Update: you are telling your own doctor
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be uncomfortable discussing personal medical issues.
Update: you are telling it to a friend
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be uncomfortable discussing personal medical issues.
Update: Your doctor has an excellent bedside manner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be uncomfortable discussing personal medical issues.
Update: You are in the waiting room of the doctor at the reception desk and many people can hear you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be uncomfortable discussing personal medical issues.
Update: You are discussing them with your spouse.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be uncomfortable discussing personal medical issues.
Update: You're discussing them with a stranger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be uncomfortable discussing personal medical issues.
Update: You are employed as a gynecologist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be uncomfortable discussing personal medical issues.
Update: You are on a first date.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you prefer to date people who are not depressed it is OK to make that known.
Update: You announce it in an unkind way.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you prefer to date people who are not depressed it is OK to make that known.
Update: You were hurt by someone's depression before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you prefer to date people who are not depressed it is OK to make that known.
Update: You don't want to be alone forever.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you prefer to date people who are not depressed it is OK to make that known.
Update: You don't have the emotional spoons to take care of someone else.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you prefer to date people who are not depressed it is OK to make that known.
Update: You use that as an excuse to not date anyone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you prefer to date people who are not depressed it is OK to make that known.
Update: You've had problems with depression.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you prefer to date people who are not depressed it is OK to make that known.
Update: You are fighting depression yourself
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you prefer to date people who are not depressed it is OK to make that known.
Update: A relationship went bad because you couldn’t save them from themselves
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you prefer to date people who are not depressed it is OK to make that known.
Update: you are depressed yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you prefer to date people who are not depressed it is OK to make that known.
Update: you do it very nicely
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want a child to have a life that might be tough for them.
Update: You want them to learn important life lessons.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want a child to have a life that might be tough for them.
Update: YOu can provide a better life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want a child to have a life that might be tough for them.
Update: You can't afford to raise them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want a child to have a life that might be tough for them.
Update: You feel that the toughness of your life made it better.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want a child to have a life that might be tough for them.
Update: The toughness of your life hurt you more than it helped.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want a child to have a life that might be tough for them.
Update: It is their dream to be a rodeo clown.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want a child to have a life that might be tough for them.
Update: They could get physically hurt.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want a child to have a life that might be tough for them.
Update: You grew up in tough circumstances just fine
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's fine not to want a child to have a life that might be tough for them.
Update: You are already very poor
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be angry with someone who says negetive things about you.
Update: They were coming from a good place.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be angry with someone who says negetive things about you.
Update: It is an attack against your character.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be angry with someone who says negetive things about you.
Update: You asked them for constructive criticism.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be angry with someone who says negetive things about you.
Update: They are your friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be angry with someone who says negetive things about you.
Update: You hurt them first
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be angry with someone who says negetive things about you.
Update: You never did anything bad to them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be angry with someone who says negetive things about you.
Update: They are telling the truth.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be angry with someone who says negetive things about you.
Update: They are lying.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be angry with someone who says negetive things about you.
Update: The things are true and the person is trying to help you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is reasonable to be angry with someone who says negetive things about you.
Update: They are telling them to your family, friends and employer.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to let strangers that could hurt you or others into your life.
Update: There's nothing you can do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to let strangers that could hurt you or others into your life.
Update: You're trying to build a successful life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to let strangers that could hurt you or others into your life.
Update: Your work involves counseling criminals and mental patients.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to let strangers that could hurt you or others into your life.
Update: You have children who would be exposed to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to let strangers that could hurt you or others into your life.
Update: they have a criminal record.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to let strangers that could hurt you or others into your life.
Update: they seem trustworthy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to let strangers that could hurt you or others into your life.
Update: You have children and don’t want them to get hurt.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to let strangers that could hurt you or others into your life.
Update: It is required by your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not okay to let strangers that could hurt you or others into your life.
Update: You are an overly trusting person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be monogamous.
Update: their religion states otherwise or something different.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be monogamous.
Update: you want be loyal to one person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be monogamous.
Update: They are polyamorous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be monogamous.
Update: They are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be monogamous.
Update: They are in a mutually open relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be monogamous.
Update: They live in states where plural marriages are practiced.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be monogamous.
Update: They have been married for forty years.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be monogamous.
Update: you are in an agreed poly relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People are expected to be monogamous.
Update: you are married.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to call someone out on inappropriate behavior.
Update: The person is likely to fire you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to call someone out on inappropriate behavior.
Update: The person is your subordinate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to call someone out on inappropriate behavior.
Update: The person is a toddler.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to call someone out on inappropriate behavior.
Update: You consider yourself an ally.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to call someone out on inappropriate behavior.
Update: The behavior is a normal part of the work environment
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to call someone out on inappropriate behavior.
Update: Other people feel sexually harassed
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to call someone out on inappropriate behavior.
Update: That person might use violence against you if you do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to call someone out on inappropriate behavior.
Update: They are harming an animal.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to call someone out on inappropriate behavior.
Update: Inappropriate behavior is open to many interpretations.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to call someone out on inappropriate behavior.
Update: Inappropriate behavior is clearly exploitation or victimization.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Is it good to make a gift instead of buying one
Update: The gift is a technology product.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Is it good to make a gift instead of buying one
Update: You want to show how much you care.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Is it good to make a gift instead of buying one
Update: You are bad at making things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Is it good to make a gift instead of buying one
Update: You don't have a lot of money to spend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Is it good to make a gift instead of buying one
Update: you don't have the time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Is it good to make a gift instead of buying one
Update: you have great craft skills
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Is it good to make a gift instead of buying one
Update: you're just being cheap
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Is it good to make a gift instead of buying one
Update: you really can't afford one
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Is it good to make a gift instead of buying one
Update: You can’t make something as good as what you can spend on something
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Is it good to make a gift instead of buying one
Update: You are very creative
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to damage someone else's car for being in your spot.
Update: they didn't know it was your spot
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to damage someone else's car for being in your spot.
Update: It happened on accident when it was being towed away.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to damage someone else's car for being in your spot.
Update: Their is another spot nearby.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to damage someone else's car for being in your spot.
Update: They hit your car and tried to leave
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to damage someone else's car for being in your spot.
Update: It is a public parking area and you don’t have a spot
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to damage someone else's car for being in your spot.
Update: it was an accident
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to damage someone else's car for being in your spot.
Update: it was an accident
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to damage someone else's car for being in your spot.
Update: You don't want to be arrested for causing property damage
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to children.
Update: the children are rude
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to children.
Update: the children are very nice
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to children.
Update: The child just kicked them in the shin.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to children.
Update: They are the parents of the children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to children.
Update: They are reckless teenaged boys attacking you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to children.
Update: They are babies or toddlers.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to children.
Update: They've been court-ordered not to have any contact with children.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to children.
Update: They're kindergarten teachers.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to children.
Update: The child is being extremely rude.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should be kind to children.
Update: They're still infants.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be hesitant to trust someone who hurt you in the past.
Update: they have been completely trustworthy for many years since.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be hesitant to trust someone who hurt you in the past.
Update: they are not sorry about what they did in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be hesitant to trust someone who hurt you in the past.
Update: They are a pathological liar.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be hesitant to trust someone who hurt you in the past.
Update: It was a serious issue.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be hesitant to trust someone who hurt you in the past.
Update: they have proven their loyalty since.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be hesitant to trust someone who hurt you in the past.
Update: it was recently.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be hesitant to trust someone who hurt you in the past.
Update: They crashed your car and didn't tell you about it until you returned home from vacation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to get something that you will like for valentine's day from your partner.
Update: You have a pact to never buy presents for each other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to get something that you will like for valentine's day from your partner.
Update: Your partner has always given you Valentine's Day gifts that you love.
Update type: strengthener