tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's good to stand up for yourself.
Update: Youhave to set an example for your younger siblings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to stand up for yourself.
Update: doing so could make the situation worse.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to stand up for yourself.
Update: you can stand up for someone else at the same time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to stand up for yourself.
Update: You don't have anything you believe in.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to stand up for yourself.
Update: You're trying to get people to respect you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should share with your friends.
Update: You only have enough for yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should share with your friends.
Update: Your friends just shared with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should share with your friends.
Update: You're contagious with the flu.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should share with your friends.
Update: You've got more than you need.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should share with your friends.
Update: You are sick and don’t want to spread your germs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should share with your friends.
Update: You are having a girls night and want them to stay awhile.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should share with your friends.
Update: you don't have enough to spare.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should share with your friends.
Update: your friends also share with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should share with your friends.
Update: You don't have enough to share.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should share with your friends.
Update: They're sharing with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is mean to exclude your boyfriend when taking a trip somewhere.`
Update: He is terrified of flying.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is mean to exclude your boyfriend when taking a trip somewhere.`
Update: His brother recently passed away.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is mean to exclude your boyfriend when taking a trip somewhere.`
Update: Your boyfriend hates travel.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is mean to exclude your boyfriend when taking a trip somewhere.`
Update: Your boyfriend has always wanted to visit that place.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is mean to exclude your boyfriend when taking a trip somewhere.`
Update: You are going on your bachelorette party vacation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is mean to exclude your boyfriend when taking a trip somewhere.`
Update: It is a couples' trip with other friends and their partners.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is mean to exclude your boyfriend when taking a trip somewhere.`
Update: The trip is for a work project.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is mean to exclude your boyfriend when taking a trip somewhere.`
Update: The trip is to his hometown.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is mean to exclude your boyfriend when taking a trip somewhere.`
Update: it is a "no significant others" trip and agreed upon.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is mean to exclude your boyfriend when taking a trip somewhere.`
Update: it is somewhere your boyfriend always wanted to go.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Not everything should be a joke.
Update: You are a comedian on stage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Not everything should be a joke.
Update: The  "jokes" contain inappropriate insults or profanity.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Not everything should be a joke.
Update: They give permission to you to joke with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Not everything should be a joke.
Update: The joke offends a person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Not everything should be a joke.
Update: You work as a circus clown.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Not everything should be a joke.
Update: You are a bishop at a middle school.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Not everything should be a joke.
Update: they are funny
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Not everything should be a joke.
Update: they're not funny
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Not everything should be a joke.
Update: You are a comedien.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Not everything should be a joke.
Update: You are a doctor at a trauma center.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't base whether or not you want to be friends with someone on how many friends that person has.
Update: You're doing business networking.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't base whether or not you want to be friends with someone on how many friends that person has.
Update: You're trying to build close friendships.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't base whether or not you want to be friends with someone on how many friends that person has.
Update: They have no friends at all and they scare you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't base whether or not you want to be friends with someone on how many friends that person has.
Update: You want a genuine relationship with someone not based on status.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't base whether or not you want to be friends with someone on how many friends that person has.
Update: That person is new to town
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't base whether or not you want to be friends with someone on how many friends that person has.
Update: you're trying to be their friend for clout
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't base whether or not you want to be friends with someone on how many friends that person has.
Update: you want to have a meaningful relationship with them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't base whether or not you want to be friends with someone on how many friends that person has.
Update: The person has so many friends and you'd be just a number to them with no meaning.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't base whether or not you want to be friends with someone on how many friends that person has.
Update: You really like them and they're a good person and like you too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to try to be independent and not ask for help.
Update: You are failing a class.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to try to be independent and not ask for help.
Update: You just moved out of your parents.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to try to be independent and not ask for help.
Update: You do not have a job and cannot afford the bills.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to try to be independent and not ask for help.
Update: You are an adult with their own place and job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to try to be independent and not ask for help.
Update: you will wind up a burden
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to try to be independent and not ask for help.
Update: you are capable
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to try to be independent and not ask for help.
Update: You are an infant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to try to be independent and not ask for help.
Update: You are leaving home for the first time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to try to be independent and not ask for help.
Update: It is a multi-person task.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to try to be independent and not ask for help.
Update: You can do it alone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Married partners should split finances equally.
Update: The married partners are in a traditional household.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Married partners should split finances equally.
Update: The married partners are in a progressive household.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Married partners should split finances equally.
Update: one is not good with money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Married partners should split finances equally.
Update: they want to avoid needless fights.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Married partners should split finances equally.
Update: One makes more than the other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Married partners should split finances equally.
Update: They want to contribute to responsibilities equally.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Married partners should split finances equally.
Update: The partners have made a different agreement.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Married partners should split finances equally.
Update: They have agreed they are equals.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Married partners should split finances equally.
Update: One partner works and one partner does not work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Married partners should split finances equally.
Update: Married partners should split finances if they both work outside the house for wages.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should never make anyone's race a big deal in any situation.
Update: You're celebrating someone for being the first person of their race to achieve something.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should never make anyone's race a big deal in any situation.
Update: You believe the other person is inferior based on their race.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should never make anyone's race a big deal in any situation.
Update: They are the first of their race to accomplish something.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should never make anyone's race a big deal in any situation.
Update: They are the only person of that race in the room.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should never make anyone's race a big deal in any situation.
Update: They are participating in an ethnic festival.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should never make anyone's race a big deal in any situation.
Update: it has nothing to do with how they do their job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: One should never make anyone's race a big deal in any situation.
Update: One is being systemically discriminated against by another race
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: One should never make anyone's race a big deal in any situation.
Update: They're talking about hiring decisions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should tip people who depend on tips to make a livable wage.
Update: They gave you very poor service.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should tip people who depend on tips to make a livable wage.
Update: You can afford to eat out.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should tip people who depend on tips to make a livable wage.
Update: You can't afford your food if you have to tip.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should tip people who depend on tips to make a livable wage.
Update: You can easily spare the money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should tip people who depend on tips to make a livable wage.
Update: you got very poor service
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should tip people who depend on tips to make a livable wage.
Update: you spent a long time at the table and spent a lot of money
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should tip people who depend on tips to make a livable wage.
Update: They give terrible service.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should tip people who depend on tips to make a livable wage.
Update: They provide good service.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should tip people who depend on tips to make a livable wage.
Update: Your server was extremely rude.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should tip people who depend on tips to make a livable wage.
Update: You're in a country with a low tipped wage.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your friend what to do.
Update: they asked for your opinion.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your friend what to do.
Update: your friend is an expert on what they're doing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your friend what to do.
Update: it is for their own safety.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your friend what to do.
Update: your friend doesn't tell you what to do.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your friend what to do.
Update: Your friend asked for advice
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your friend what to do.
Update: Your friend is more experienced than you are
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your friend what to do.
Update: you have truly good advice for them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your friend what to do.
Update: you have no experience in the situation they are in
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your friend what to do.
Update: Your friend is trying to avoid getting hurt.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't tell your friend what to do.
Update: You're talking about relationships with your friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to your sibling's friends.
Update: they are being mean to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to your sibling's friends.
Update: you don't want your siblings to beat you up.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to your sibling's friends.
Update: Unless they are taking advantage of your sibling.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to your sibling's friends.
Update: Especially if they are supportive of your sibling.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to your sibling's friends.
Update: they are cruel people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to your sibling's friends.
Update: they could do you a favor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to your sibling's friends.
Update: You want to be friends with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to your sibling's friends.
Update: Their friends are getting them into illegal activities
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be nice to your sibling's friends.
Update: They are really nice people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your friends will appreciate you sharing your good news with them.
Update: That good news will take you far away from them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your friends will appreciate you sharing your good news with them.
Update: It makes them happy to see you happy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your friends will appreciate you sharing your good news with them.
Update: The good news is that you beat them in a competition.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your friends will appreciate you sharing your good news with them.
Update: The good news is that your team won a competition.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your friends will appreciate you sharing your good news with them.
Update: your news will make them jealous.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your friends will appreciate you sharing your good news with them.
Update: you know they will be happy for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your friends will appreciate you sharing your good news with them.
Update: They think that the good news is you bragging.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your friends will appreciate you sharing your good news with them.
Update: The good news involves them as well.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your friends will appreciate you sharing your good news with them.
Update: They just lost out on a promotion at work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your friends will appreciate you sharing your good news with them.
Update: You won several tickets to a concert that they would love to attend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When your superiors don't set an example, you should call them out.
Update: They sign your paycheck each week.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When your superiors don't set an example, you should call them out.
Update: They stole from your pension fund.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When your superiors don't set an example, you should call them out.
Update: They'll fire you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When your superiors don't set an example, you should call them out.
Update: It unjustly enriches them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When your superiors don't set an example, you should call them out.
Update: Doing so would embarrass them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When your superiors don't set an example, you should call them out.
Update: They are in a position of authority.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When your superiors don't set an example, you should call them out.
Update: You think they will retaliate against you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When your superiors don't set an example, you should call them out.
Update: They punish you for similar actions
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: When your superiors don't set an example, you should call them out.
Update: You want to keep your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: When your superiors don't set an example, you should call them out.
Update: It puts people in danger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not acceptable or effective to nag people to do things they say they will.
Update: You are a parent and your kids aren’t listening
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not acceptable or effective to nag people to do things they say they will.
Update: They already told you they would do the thing
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not acceptable or effective to nag people to do things they say they will.
Update: It's about something important.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not acceptable or effective to nag people to do things they say they will.
Update: It's about something trivial.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not acceptable or effective to nag people to do things they say they will.
Update: The person is way behind and there is a deadline approaching.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not acceptable or effective to nag people to do things they say they will.
Update: The person is your boss at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not acceptable or effective to nag people to do things they say they will.
Update: They know how much you are depending on them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not acceptable or effective to nag people to do things they say they will.
Update: they're not responsible enough to handle tasks
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not acceptable or effective to nag people to do things they say they will.
Update: it's none of your business anyway
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be uncomfortable around members of the opposite gender who you don't know.
Update: You're trying to get acquainted with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be uncomfortable around members of the opposite gender who you don't know.
Update: You're still a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be uncomfortable around members of the opposite gender who you don't know.
Update: You have had a bad experience with a member of the opposite sex.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be uncomfortable around members of the opposite gender who you don't know.
Update: You are shy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be uncomfortable around members of the opposite gender who you don't know.
Update: They're close friends with a good friend of yours.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be uncomfortable around members of the opposite gender who you don't know.
Update: They have odd personalities.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be uncomfortable around members of the opposite gender who you don't know.
Update: You have to administer medical assistance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to be uncomfortable around members of the opposite gender who you don't know.
Update: They are embarrassed by a delicate situation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be annoyed by other people's pets, and one should instead cultivate fondness for them.
Update: they are dangerous animals
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be annoyed by other people's pets, and one should instead cultivate fondness for them.
Update: you have pets too
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be annoyed by other people's pets, and one should instead cultivate fondness for them.
Update: the pet is mean.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be annoyed by other people's pets, and one should instead cultivate fondness for them.
Update: other people have fondness for your pets.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be annoyed by other people's pets, and one should instead cultivate fondness for them.
Update: Unless you are allergic to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be annoyed by other people's pets, and one should instead cultivate fondness for them.
Update: Especially if you have to live with them anyway.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be annoyed by other people's pets, and one should instead cultivate fondness for them.
Update: Their pets keep biting you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be annoyed by other people's pets, and one should instead cultivate fondness for them.
Update: Their pets try to be friendly with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be annoyed by other people's pets, and one should instead cultivate fondness for them.
Update: they have a pet tiger which could kill people
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to be annoyed by other people's pets, and one should instead cultivate fondness for them.
Update: you have pets of your own
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good for be sorry for wronging another person.
Update: Any other choice you made would have hurt more people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good for be sorry for wronging another person.
Update: You then try to make amends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good for be sorry for wronging another person.
Update: You wronged them on purpose.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good for be sorry for wronging another person.
Update: they were hurting you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good for be sorry for wronging another person.
Update: it was by accident.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good for be sorry for wronging another person.
Update: The behavior was very serious
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good for be sorry for wronging another person.
Update: You know what you did was wrong
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good for be sorry for wronging another person.
Update: You turned in someone for abuse.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good for be sorry for wronging another person.
Update: They didn't do anything to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should give money to your kids to give to their parent.
Update: You're living paycheck to paycheck.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should give money to your kids to give to their parent.
Update: You're playing the game Monopoly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should give money to your kids to give to their parent.
Update: Their parent makes more money than you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should give money to your kids to give to their parent.
Update: Their parent is struggling to pay the bills.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should give money to your kids to give to their parent.
Update: The parent doesn't spend any money on the kids.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should give money to your kids to give to their parent.
Update: They won't take money from you directly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should give money to your kids to give to their parent.
Update: They will spend it and not give it to the parent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should give money to your kids to give to their parent.
Update: You owe them for missed child support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should give money to your kids to give to their parent.
Update: They spent their allowance on themself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should give money to your kids to give to their parent.
Update: They have earned it.
Update type: strengthener