tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is expected that people will not shave someones head without permission.
Update: They are males entering the military and it is required.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that people will not shave someones head without permission.
Update: A woman is seated in a salon chair.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that people will not shave someones head without permission.
Update: they need brain surgery
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that people will not shave someones head without permission.
Update: they are drunk
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that people will not shave someones head without permission.
Update: The person needs emergency surgery on their head.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that people will not shave someones head without permission.
Update: The person is at a sleepover.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that people will not shave someones head without permission.
Update: The person is unconscious and needs brain surgery.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that people will not shave someones head without permission.
Update: That person is unemployed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected that people will not shave someones head without permission.
Update: The balding customer usually requests the shaving from the barber in the past.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected that people will not shave someones head without permission.
Update: The person has beautiful, thick hair.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not leave a tip if your hairdresser did a very bad job or cut you with the clippers.
Update: They're a family member.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not leave a tip if your hairdresser did a very bad job or cut you with the clippers.
Update: You have no intention of ever using them again.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not leave a tip if your hairdresser did a very bad job or cut you with the clippers.
Update: It was an accident and they cut your hair exactly how you asked them to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not leave a tip if your hairdresser did a very bad job or cut you with the clippers.
Update: They are a student and a beauty school.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not leave a tip if your hairdresser did a very bad job or cut you with the clippers.
Update: they are a friend.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not leave a tip if your hairdresser did a very bad job or cut you with the clippers.
Update: you have had issues with them in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not leave a tip if your hairdresser did a very bad job or cut you with the clippers.
Update: giving a tip is required.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not leave a tip if your hairdresser did a very bad job or cut you with the clippers.
Update: you received poor service!
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not leave a tip if your hairdresser did a very bad job or cut you with the clippers.
Update: the job took a long amount of time
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to not leave a tip if your hairdresser did a very bad job or cut you with the clippers.
Update: the job was simple and they messed it up regardless
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask for your money back.
Update: you already used or consumed the item.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask for your money back.
Update: you are returning the item brand new.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask for your money back.
Update: You already used the item thoroughly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask for your money back.
Update: It wasn't as advertised.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask for your money back.
Update: you have consumed the goods.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask for your money back.
Update: a product is not as advertised.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask for your money back.
Update: You already consumed the product and there was nothing wrong with it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask for your money back.
Update: The product was defective.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask for your money back.
Update: You don't have the item to return.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to ask for your money back.
Update: You loaned the money to a friend.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to state your expectations in a relationship.
Update: you don't know what your expectations are.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to state your expectations in a relationship.
Update: you are starting to get serious.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to state your expectations in a relationship.
Update: Your expectations are already well known to the other.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to state your expectations in a relationship.
Update: It's a close, romantic relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to state your expectations in a relationship.
Update: It's the very early stages of the relationship and you are not sure if this is the right person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to state your expectations in a relationship.
Update: You can tell the person is very serious about you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to state your expectations in a relationship.
Update: Your relationship is just an acquaintanceship
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to state your expectations in a relationship.
Update: Your relationship is romantic in intent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is important to state your expectations in a relationship.
Update: You're only wanting a casual fling.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is important to state your expectations in a relationship.
Update: You want to have a long term relationship with someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone that has no ambition in life.
Update: You are looking for someone to be a stay at home partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone that has no ambition in life.
Update: You have a lot of goals and ambitions in life for yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone that has no ambition in life.
Update: you do not mind.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone that has no ambition in life.
Update: it would get in the way of your own ambitions
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone that has no ambition in life.
Update: you don't want a life that progresses over time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone that has no ambition in life.
Update: you have dreams and aspirations.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone that has no ambition in life.
Update: they are filthy rich.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone that has no ambition in life.
Update: they are pessimistic.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone that has no ambition in life.
Update: They are independently wealthy and treat you well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't date someone that has no ambition in life.
Update: They are grown, poor and still live with their parents.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be inappropriate in the classroom.
Update: You're exchanging private messages with your crush.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be inappropriate in the classroom.
Update: You're disrupting everyone else's work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be inappropriate in the classroom.
Update: the class hasn't started yet
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be inappropriate in the classroom.
Update: the teacher is in the middle of speaking
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be inappropriate in the classroom.
Update: You teach young children
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be inappropriate in the classroom.
Update: You are rehearsing a role as someone who misbehaves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be inappropriate in the classroom.
Update: Others are trying to learn.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not be inappropriate in the classroom.
Update: You're having a Halloween Party at school.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not be inappropriate in the classroom.
Update: The entire class is taking an exam.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Mental health issues are expected to be difficult to deal with.
Update: There's a large support network of people in place to help them through any difficult times.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Mental health issues are expected to be difficult to deal with.
Update: They were diagnosed with the problem at a very young age.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Mental health issues are expected to be difficult to deal with.
Update: You have run of the mill depression.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Mental health issues are expected to be difficult to deal with.
Update: You have multiple diagnoses.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Mental health issues are expected to be difficult to deal with.
Update: they are very mild.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Mental health issues are expected to be difficult to deal with.
Update: they have been undiagnosed for a long time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Mental health issues are expected to be difficult to deal with.
Update: They are being successfully treated.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Mental health issues are expected to be difficult to deal with.
Update: The person suffering doesn't realize they have a mental health issue.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Mental health issues are expected to be difficult to deal with.
Update: They are mild and can be handled fairly easily.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Mental health issues are expected to be difficult to deal with.
Update: They are serious issues that require institutional care.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should accuse your parents of things.
Update: Your parents haven't done anything wrong.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should accuse your parents of things.
Update: Your parents are harming you in some way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should accuse your parents of things.
Update: Those things didn't happen.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should accuse your parents of things.
Update: There's a chance they'll do the same thing to your younger siblings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should accuse your parents of things.
Update: They pay you a hefty allowance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should accuse your parents of things.
Update: They violated you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should accuse your parents of things.
Update: You are still living at home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should accuse your parents of things.
Update: You're trying to get them to stop bad behavior.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should accuse your parents of things.
Update: Your parents don't take criticism well and threaten to kick you out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should accuse your parents of things.
Update: They got married at 18 and are against you getting married at 20
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to call people names.
Update: They are bullying you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to call people names.
Update: They are your pastor.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to call people names.
Update: you are calling them by their given name or nickname.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to call people names.
Update: you don't want to offend someone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to call people names.
Update: you are playing a card game.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to call people names.
Update: you are doing it to bully them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to call people names.
Update: You are in a rap battle with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to call people names.
Update: They are a small child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to call people names.
Update: You're too young to understand that it's wrong.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is unacceptable to call people names.
Update: You're old enough to know better and they've told you to stop doing it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should take responsibilities for their own mistakes.
Update: you caused serious harm.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should take responsibilities for their own mistakes.
Update: there were circumstances beyond your control
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should take responsibilities for their own mistakes.
Update: you want to be given more responsibility later.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should take responsibilities for their own mistakes.
Update: Someone else caused the mistake.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should take responsibilities for their own mistakes.
Update: They are trying to be a leader or run for president.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should take responsibilities for their own mistakes.
Update: They didn't know any better when making the mistake.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should take responsibilities for their own mistakes.
Update: They didn't heed warnings before making the mistake.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: People should take responsibilities for their own mistakes.
Update: They are a child who doesn't know any better.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: People should take responsibilities for their own mistakes.
Update: Harming others was involved in any way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report issues at work.
Update: the issues are not major or important
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report issues at work.
Update: the issues continue to spiral into bigger issues
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report issues at work.
Update: Unless the issues are minor personal things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report issues at work.
Update: Especially if they put anyone in danger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report issues at work.
Update: you are currently the highest possible role.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report issues at work.
Update: you are a quality control technician.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report issues at work.
Update: Doing so goes against company policy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report issues at work.
Update: The issues could endanger other coworkers.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report issues at work.
Update: you are the owner and have nobody to report to.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You are expected to report issues at work.
Update: people are being hurt.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your friends might resent you if you don't pitch in on a group effort.
Update: The project is planning your birthday party.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your friends might resent you if you don't pitch in on a group effort.
Update: You are being graded on it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your friends might resent you if you don't pitch in on a group effort.
Update: You are really sick in the hospital.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your friends might resent you if you don't pitch in on a group effort.
Update: You are lazy and leave them to do all the work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your friends might resent you if you don't pitch in on a group effort.
Update: You don't have any useful skills that could contribute to this particular project.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your friends might resent you if you don't pitch in on a group effort.
Update: You're the only one who has some critical skill.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your friends might resent you if you don't pitch in on a group effort.
Update: You are showing them what it is like when they don’t help out
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your friends might resent you if you don't pitch in on a group effort.
Update: You don’t usually pitch in
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Your friends might resent you if you don't pitch in on a group effort.
Update: you are home sick in bed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Your friends might resent you if you don't pitch in on a group effort.
Update: you are sneaking off to have some fun instead.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask someone to change their appearance for you.
Update: you are hiring them for a modeling gig
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask someone to change their appearance for you.
Update: they are your significant other
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask someone to change their appearance for you.
Update: it would improve their life overall
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask someone to change their appearance for you.
Update: they would be accepted by others
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask someone to change their appearance for you.
Update: You are going to a Halloween Party and they are wearing the same outfit.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask someone to change their appearance for you.
Update: They are an adult.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask someone to change their appearance for you.
Update: You are their military recruiter.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask someone to change their appearance for you.
Update: Their appearance is appropriate for their situation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask someone to change their appearance for you.
Update: you are going to a restaurant that requires men to wear a jacket.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's impolite to ask someone to change their appearance for you.
Update: they have their own unique style.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to bully someone.
Update: they've always been kind to you
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to bully someone.
Update: You're bullying someone who is bullying others to teach them a lesson.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to bully someone.
Update: They're smaller than you and are sensitive and can be hurt long term.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to bully someone.
Update: they're being a bully to someone else
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to bully someone.
Update: you're moral and fair
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to bully someone.
Update: They are younger or smaller.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to bully someone.
Update: they are racist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to bully someone.
Update: you are ganging up on them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to keep distance from people that make you unhappy.
Update: those people are your close family members
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to keep distance from people that make you unhappy.
Update: those people seek to do so deliberately
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to keep distance from people that make you unhappy.
Update: You have to work with them on a project.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to keep distance from people that make you unhappy.
Update: They don't seen to care about your feelings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to keep distance from people that make you unhappy.
Update: these people are your dependant children
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to keep distance from people that make you unhappy.
Update: the people are abusive
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to keep distance from people that make you unhappy.
Update: You work with those people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to keep distance from people that make you unhappy.
Update: They are abusive to you and that is why you are unhappy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to keep distance from people that make you unhappy.
Update: Doing so would hurt their feelings immensely and they have no idea why.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to keep distance from people that make you unhappy.
Update: You have already tried to deal with them one on one to no avail.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's unacceptable to not reward others or companies for what they worked for.
Update: They are running a scam.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's unacceptable to not reward others or companies for what they worked for.
Update: They have performed a service for you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's unacceptable to not reward others or companies for what they worked for.
Update: they stole from the company before
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's unacceptable to not reward others or companies for what they worked for.
Update: they did a lot of great things that the company benefited from
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's unacceptable to not reward others or companies for what they worked for.
Update: They are found to be in violation of human rights.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's unacceptable to not reward others or companies for what they worked for.
Update: You signed a contract to pay for the work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's unacceptable to not reward others or companies for what they worked for.
Update: they volunteered to do the work for free.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's unacceptable to not reward others or companies for what they worked for.
Update: the projects cost a lot of money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's unacceptable to not reward others or companies for what they worked for.
Update: They volunteered and you never said you would pay them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's unacceptable to not reward others or companies for what they worked for.
Update: You offered to pay for their services.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't care about your ex's opinion.
Update: it relates to children you share with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't care about your ex's opinion.
Update: it relates to your new relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't care about your ex's opinion.
Update: They are talking about childcare arrangements.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't care about your ex's opinion.
Update: They are commenting on your hair.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't care about your ex's opinion.
Update: They are your doctor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't care about your ex's opinion.
Update: They have a third grade reading level.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't care about your ex's opinion.
Update: You have kids with them
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't care about your ex's opinion.
Update: You only dated them for a few months
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't care about your ex's opinion.
Update: your ex gives good advice
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't care about your ex's opinion.
Update: you're in a relationship with a new person
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to stand up for yourself.
Update: you harm other people in the process.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to stand up for yourself.
Update: you believe strongly in something.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to stand up for yourself.
Update: Someone has a gun and you are unarmed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to stand up for yourself.
Update: You are being bullied.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to stand up for yourself.
Update: Your bully is a world class martial artist.
Update type: weakener