tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to expect your partner to show you affection by doing something special.
Update: It's your birthday.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to expect your partner to show you affection by doing something special.
Update: you haven't been in a relationship long and she's still unsure of her feelings
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to expect your partner to show you affection by doing something special.
Update: you've been together for years and expect to get married soon
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to put people in the friend zone.
Update: You asked them to get married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to put people in the friend zone.
Update: You are dating their brother.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to put people in the friend zone.
Update: You are still married to that person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to put people in the friend zone.
Update: You are not physically attracted to that person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to put people in the friend zone.
Update: It's your parents.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to put people in the friend zone.
Update: You're not romantically attracted to them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to put people in the friend zone.
Update: The other person is not attractive
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to put people in the friend zone.
Update: You consider that person a potential partner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to put people in the friend zone.
Update: You have no romantic feelings for them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should only get a tip if you deserve it.
Update: The reason for not getting a tip is due to something out of your control.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should only get a tip if you deserve it.
Update: You already get paid a high wage.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should only get a tip if you deserve it.
Update: You live where people depend on tips to survive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should only get a tip if you deserve it.
Update: You gave crappy service.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should only get a tip if you deserve it.
Update: You are homeless and need the money
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should only get a tip if you deserve it.
Update: You do a great job
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should only get a tip if you deserve it.
Update: You work a job where tipping is standard.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should only get a tip if you deserve it.
Update: You don't get tips at your job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should only get a tip if you deserve it.
Update: you're serving a large table of diners
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should only get a tip if you deserve it.
Update: it's a simple order for just a couple people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Following a stranger to flirt makes the person uncomfortable and should be avoided.
Update: The stranger is receptive
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Following a stranger to flirt makes the person uncomfortable and should be avoided.
Update: The person doing the following is a man and is going after a woman
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Following a stranger to flirt makes the person uncomfortable and should be avoided.
Update: the person has shown you that they are interested by making eye contact and smiling.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Following a stranger to flirt makes the person uncomfortable and should be avoided.
Update: the person appears scared and nervous.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Following a stranger to flirt makes the person uncomfortable and should be avoided.
Update: The other person is flirting back.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Following a stranger to flirt makes the person uncomfortable and should be avoided.
Update: The person has a restraining order against you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Following a stranger to flirt makes the person uncomfortable and should be avoided.
Update: You are at a dating convention.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Following a stranger to flirt makes the person uncomfortable and should be avoided.
Update: They are carrying a knife with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Following a stranger to flirt makes the person uncomfortable and should be avoided.
Update: The person has told you they weren't interested.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to pay more than your share if you don't want to.
Update: you didn't pay your full share last time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to pay more than your share if you don't want to.
Update: the deal is to split the costs evenly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to pay more than your share if you don't want to.
Update: Everyone usually goes dutch
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to pay more than your share if you don't want to.
Update: You signed a contract saying you would pay two thirds.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to pay more than your share if you don't want to.
Update: You signed a contract saying you would only pay your part.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to pay more than your share if you don't want to.
Update: one of your friends is broke.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to pay more than your share if you don't want to.
Update: you can barely afford your own share.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You don't have to pay more than your share if you don't want to.
Update: You ate way more food than anyone else at the restaurant
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You don't have to pay more than your share if you don't want to.
Update: You barely ate any food at the restaurant
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's very demanding to set a time on when people need to respond to your texts.
Update: You need them to get back in a timely matter in order to make plans with them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's very demanding to set a time on when people need to respond to your texts.
Update: They are very busy with other things.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's very demanding to set a time on when people need to respond to your texts.
Update: It's a time-critical text pertaining to work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's very demanding to set a time on when people need to respond to your texts.
Update: It's just for the convenience of the texter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's very demanding to set a time on when people need to respond to your texts.
Update: Someone's safety is at risk.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's very demanding to set a time on when people need to respond to your texts.
Update: You know the other person is at work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's very demanding to set a time on when people need to respond to your texts.
Update: It's your boss and your job depends on an immediate reply.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's very demanding to set a time on when people need to respond to your texts.
Update: You're busy and it's just a friend that wants to chat while they're waiting in line at the DMV.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's very demanding to set a time on when people need to respond to your texts.
Update: They need to RSVP in time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's very demanding to set a time on when people need to respond to your texts.
Update: You know they are working at that time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to say no to a request.
Update: It is a part of your paying job
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to say no to a request.
Update: It goes against your morals
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to say no to a request.
Update: It comes from your boss and you know it's really an order.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to say no to a request.
Update: It is a marriage request.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to say no to a request.
Update: A man with crutches asks you to give him your bus seat.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to say no to a request.
Update: The request makes you uncomfortable.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to say no to a request.
Update: the request is simple and easy for you to adhere to
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to say no to a request.
Update: you simply cannot afford to meet their request
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to say no to a request.
Update: It's an urgent family matter.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's acceptable to say no to a request.
Update: You don't have time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to be understanding of a partner's mental issues.
Update: It causes them to act in completely unpredictable ways towards you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to be understanding of a partner's mental issues.
Update: You ever want them to get better.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to be understanding of a partner's mental issues.
Update: They use their problems to get their way in relationship disagreements.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to be understanding of a partner's mental issues.
Update: They are working hard on their mental problems in therapy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to be understanding of a partner's mental issues.
Update: They choke you on a daily basis.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to be understanding of a partner's mental issues.
Update: Their parent died of the same disease.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to be understanding of a partner's mental issues.
Update: They are depressed.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to be understanding of a partner's mental issues.
Update: Your partner hasn't told you that they have mental health issues.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong not to be understanding of a partner's mental issues.
Update: You're a counselor
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to ask someone to borrow something if you really need it.
Update: They require it for survival.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to ask someone to borrow something if you really need it.
Update: They have more than enough to share.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to ask someone to borrow something if you really need it.
Update: You plan on using it daily.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to ask someone to borrow something if you really need it.
Update: You will only need to use it once or twice.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to ask someone to borrow something if you really need it.
Update: you can afford to go buy what you need.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to ask someone to borrow something if you really need it.
Update: you cannot afford to buy it for yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to ask someone to borrow something if you really need it.
Update: You could just buy your own.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to ask someone to borrow something if you really need it.
Update: You can't afford to buy your own.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to ask someone to borrow something if you really need it.
Update: It has sentimental value to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to ask someone to borrow something if you really need it.
Update: It will help you get better after an illness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not a siblings job to take care of a sibling, parents should do this.
Update: The parents aren't around.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not a siblings job to take care of a sibling, parents should do this.
Update: The sibling is very young.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not a siblings job to take care of a sibling, parents should do this.
Update: You only have one parent and they have to work two jobs just to support you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not a siblings job to take care of a sibling, parents should do this.
Update: They're not even a teenager yet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not a siblings job to take care of a sibling, parents should do this.
Update: The parents are mentally incapable.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not a siblings job to take care of a sibling, parents should do this.
Update: It interferes with your goals in life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not a siblings job to take care of a sibling, parents should do this.
Update: They have a single mom who works and who also pays them to babysit.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not a siblings job to take care of a sibling, parents should do this.
Update: There are two parents in the household, and one of them does not work.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not a siblings job to take care of a sibling, parents should do this.
Update: The parents are ill and cannot help
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not a siblings job to take care of a sibling, parents should do this.
Update: The brother is a child and doesnt know how
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about friends to other friends behind their back.
Update: You are planning a surprise party for them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about friends to other friends behind their back.
Update: You are saying hurtful things about them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about friends to other friends behind their back.
Update: You're just spreading rumors.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about friends to other friends behind their back.
Update: You're spreading untrue information
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about friends to other friends behind their back.
Update: you are discussing how to help them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about friends to other friends behind their back.
Update: you care about your friend's feelings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about friends to other friends behind their back.
Update: you are trying to plan a surprise party for their birthday.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad to talk about friends to other friends behind their back.
Update: you are saying mean things about them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to show respect for causes you believe in.
Update: The cause turns out to be poorly founded
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to show respect for causes you believe in.
Update: It brings you joy
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to show respect for causes you believe in.
Update: You don’t respect anything
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to show respect for causes you believe in.
Update: You feel passionately about it
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to show respect for causes you believe in.
Update: Doing so disrespects your parents.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to show respect for causes you believe in.
Update: They are for the common good.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to show respect for causes you believe in.
Update: You're afraid people will amke fun of you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to show respect for causes you believe in.
Update: You want other people to join the cause.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to show respect for causes you believe in.
Update: the organization is found to be corrupt.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to show respect for causes you believe in.
Update: you wish to further the cause.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to make sure people are held accountable for immoral actions
Update: The immoral action was necessary to save someone's life.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to make sure people are held accountable for immoral actions
Update: The immoral action caused other people harm.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to make sure people are held accountable for immoral actions
Update: you have no proof they did anything wrong
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to make sure people are held accountable for immoral actions
Update: they got away with abusing their spouse in the past
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to make sure people are held accountable for immoral actions
Update: Societies morals have changed over time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to make sure people are held accountable for immoral actions
Update: They have done heinous acts against others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to make sure people are held accountable for immoral actions
Update: They were intoxicated.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to make sure people are held accountable for immoral actions
Update: They cheated on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is good to make sure people are held accountable for immoral actions
Update: You are immoral yourself
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is good to make sure people are held accountable for immoral actions
Update: They need to know what they did is wrong
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to confront a partner in an aggressive way.
Update: You are playing a game of football.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to confront a partner in an aggressive way.
Update: You're having a verbal argument.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to confront a partner in an aggressive way.
Update: They have threatened you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to confront a partner in an aggressive way.
Update: You want to resolve things peacefully.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to confront a partner in an aggressive way.
Update: It is unavoidable when passions are inflamed.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to confront a partner in an aggressive way.
Update: It is avoidable and common sense prevails.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to confront a partner in an aggressive way.
Update: you're unable to control your emotions in that instance
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to confront a partner in an aggressive way.
Update: you want them to be calm in the conversation
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to confront a partner in an aggressive way.
Update: The partner made an honest mistake.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's proper to expect the person you're living with to pick up after themselves.
Update: They're a baby.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's proper to expect the person you're living with to pick up after themselves.
Update: They're capable of doing it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's proper to expect the person you're living with to pick up after themselves.
Update: They are disabled and therefore, unable to do so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's proper to expect the person you're living with to pick up after themselves.
Update: They are healthy and fit and fully capable of doing this.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's proper to expect the person you're living with to pick up after themselves.
Update: they're in a wheel chair and can't
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's proper to expect the person you're living with to pick up after themselves.
Update: they are not even paying any rent
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's proper to expect the person you're living with to pick up after themselves.
Update: You have guests coming over.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's proper to expect the person you're living with to pick up after themselves.
Update: You live with a young child and they are still learning how to be clean.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's proper to expect the person you're living with to pick up after themselves.
Update: The person is an adult who should know how to be clean.
Update type: strengthener