tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: Informing family about the happenings of others is a way to stay bonded as a family unit.
Update: Your family is toxic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Informing family about the happenings of others is a way to stay bonded as a family unit.
Update: You live far apart from each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Informing family about the happenings of others is a way to stay bonded as a family unit.
Update: it's a personal secret that nobody else needs to know about.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Informing family about the happenings of others is a way to stay bonded as a family unit.
Update: the family can help with a crisis.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Informing family about the happenings of others is a way to stay bonded as a family unit.
Update: It is gossip that results in fighting.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Informing family about the happenings of others is a way to stay bonded as a family unit.
Update: It results in you speaking more frequently.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad form to continue using the Netflix account of an ex.
Update: They don't care if you use it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad form to continue using the Netflix account of an ex.
Update: You can easily afford your own account.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad form to continue using the Netflix account of an ex.
Update: you are the one still paying for it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad form to continue using the Netflix account of an ex.
Update: they took over the responsibility of paying the bill.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad form to continue using the Netflix account of an ex.
Update: The ex gave permission to do so.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad form to continue using the Netflix account of an ex.
Update: The ex asked you not to use the account.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad form to continue using the Netflix account of an ex.
Update: You still pay for half of the cost.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad form to continue using the Netflix account of an ex.
Update: The breakup was bitterly acrimonious.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's bad form to continue using the Netflix account of an ex.
Update: They haven't moved out yet and still owe you rent.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's bad form to continue using the Netflix account of an ex.
Update: They are a hacker and can track your digital movements.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's important to spend time with your mother.
Update: She is a toxic person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's important to spend time with your mother.
Update: She is very old with little time left.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's important to spend time with your mother.
Update: You live very far away from your mother.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's important to spend time with your mother.
Update: Your mother is very old.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's important to spend time with your mother.
Update: Your mother is abusive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's important to spend time with your mother.
Update: You have a very close family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's important to spend time with your mother.
Update: Your mother doesn't like your spouse
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's important to spend time with your mother.
Update: Your mouther is dying
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's important to spend time with your mother.
Update: your mother is psychotic and violent
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's important to spend time with your mother.
Update: she is bedridden and needs your help
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to serve a customer who is paying for your services.
Update: You asked another waiter to take your place.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to serve a customer who is paying for your services.
Update: They are very polite and nice to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to serve a customer who is paying for your services.
Update: The customer is doing illegal activities in your store.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to serve a customer who is paying for your services.
Update: The customer has been waiting patiently.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to serve a customer who is paying for your services.
Update: They are being hostile.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to serve a customer who is paying for your services.
Update: You are doing so based on their skin color.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to serve a customer who is paying for your services.
Update: The customer is asking for someone else to serve them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to serve a customer who is paying for your services.
Update: They're being patient.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to serve a customer who is paying for your services.
Update: The customer was quite ill, her companion called an ambulance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to serve a customer who is paying for your services.
Update: The customer was a long time patron of the diner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to give people an unfair advantage
Update: They are your younger sibling and you want them to win.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to give people an unfair advantage
Update: You are playing in team sports and could get into trouble.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to give people an unfair advantage
Update: You are golfing with your boss.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to give people an unfair advantage
Update: They could become obnoxious after winning.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to give people an unfair advantage
Update: You're contending with young children who will get discouraged if they lose all of the time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to give people an unfair advantage
Update: If you're doing it out of bigoted beliefs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to give people an unfair advantage
Update: they need a handicap to keep up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to give people an unfair advantage
Update: you're on an even playing field.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to give people an unfair advantage
Update: It is your own child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to give people an unfair advantage
Update: It is for an election.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to make noise that might disturb the neighbors.
Update: It's the middle of the day and they're all at work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to make noise that might disturb the neighbors.
Update: It's 3 AM.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to make noise that might disturb the neighbors.
Update: You are trying to call for help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to make noise that might disturb the neighbors.
Update: It is in the middle of the night.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to make noise that might disturb the neighbors.
Update: You are trying to drown out your neighbor's noise.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to make noise that might disturb the neighbors.
Update: Your neighbors are light sleepers.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to make noise that might disturb the neighbors.
Update: You are giving birth
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to make noise that might disturb the neighbors.
Update: It is 3 am
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to make noise that might disturb the neighbors.
Update: They are having very loud sex
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to make noise that might disturb the neighbors.
Update: They have small children sleeping
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to demand fairness as a customer.
Update: it is a sale for a charity drive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to demand fairness as a customer.
Update: the product is a necessity, like medicine.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to demand fairness as a customer.
Update: they are doing the best they can.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to demand fairness as a customer.
Update: they are not even trying to.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to demand fairness as a customer.
Update: You are just trying to get a deal.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to demand fairness as a customer.
Update: The price has been marked wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to demand fairness as a customer.
Update: You're being treated differently because of your race.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to demand fairness as a customer.
Update: You have stolen from the store.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's reasonable to demand fairness as a customer.
Update: The clerk is being rude.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call CPS on people without a good reason.
Update: You have had suspicions for a long time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call CPS on people without a good reason.
Update: There is a chance the children could be taken away.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call CPS on people without a good reason.
Update: You are only doing it out of spite.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call CPS on people without a good reason.
Update: You are just trying to cause trouble.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call CPS on people without a good reason.
Update: Your gut tells you there is danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call CPS on people without a good reason.
Update: The family isn't white.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't call CPS on people without a good reason.
Update: You have no reason to even suspect wrongdoing.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to do things with out your significant other sometimes.
Update: The things you want to do involve getting married.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to do things with out your significant other sometimes.
Update: Your partner doesn't enjoy the same hobbies as you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to do things with out your significant other sometimes.
Update: It leads to suspicions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to do things with out your significant other sometimes.
Update: You love getting back together afterwards.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to do things with out your significant other sometimes.
Update: they really need to be with you for support
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to do things with out your significant other sometimes.
Update: you are mad at them and need a healthy break
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to do things with out your significant other sometimes.
Update: your significant other will take it personally.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to do things with out your significant other sometimes.
Update: your significant other does things without you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to do things with out your significant other sometimes.
Update: You have an attachment disorder and cannot overcome it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to want to do things with out your significant other sometimes.
Update: Your significant other does things without you regularly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to end relationships that are not working out.
Update: One partner is hospitalized with a terminal illness.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to end relationships that are not working out.
Update: Their are no children who will be affected.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to end relationships that are not working out.
Update: They are treating you badly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to end relationships that are not working out.
Update: The relationship is with your six month old baby with special needs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to end relationships that are not working out.
Update: You are moving to a new country and will never see that person again.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to end relationships that are not working out.
Update: The other person is being abusive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to end relationships that are not working out.
Update: The relationship in question is one with your young child.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to end relationships that are not working out.
Update: It is making you unhappy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to avoid your girlfriend when she's on her period.
Update: she really wants to be alone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to avoid your girlfriend when she's on her period.
Update: she wants you to help her through
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to avoid your girlfriend when she's on her period.
Update: She asks you to leave her alone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to avoid your girlfriend when she's on her period.
Update: She is feeling emotional and lonely.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to avoid your girlfriend when she's on her period.
Update: She becomes violent
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to avoid your girlfriend when she's on her period.
Update: She is in pain
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to avoid your girlfriend when she's on her period.
Update: She's suffering from PMS as well.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to avoid your girlfriend when she's on her period.
Update: You tell her that you fine menstruation repulsive.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to avoid your girlfriend when she's on her period.
Update: She snaps at you a lot while menstruating.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's hurtful to avoid your girlfriend when she's on her period.
Update: She needs your emotional support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Mooching off family members is undesirable.
Update: You can't support yourself financially.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Mooching off family members is undesirable.
Update: You have more money than you need already.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Mooching off family members is undesirable.
Update: It's just temporary because of job loss or medical bills.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Mooching off family members is undesirable.
Update: You are just being lazy and can be independent if you tried.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Mooching off family members is undesirable.
Update: You are a child and can't support yourself.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Mooching off family members is undesirable.
Update: You are able to get a job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Mooching off family members is undesirable.
Update: You have a mutual mooching relationship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Mooching off family members is undesirable.
Update: You are an adult who should be able to care for yourself.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Mooching off family members is undesirable.
Update: They really enjoy giving you things.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Mooching off family members is undesirable.
Update: They don't have much money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Reporting a superior can result in retaliation against you.
Update: You expose fraud and the superior is fired.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Reporting a superior can result in retaliation against you.
Update: You report the superior for something petty.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Reporting a superior can result in retaliation against you.
Update: The report leads to the superior getting fired.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Reporting a superior can result in retaliation against you.
Update: They know it was you who reported them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Reporting a superior can result in retaliation against you.
Update: there are whistleblower laws in place to protect you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Reporting a superior can result in retaliation against you.
Update: your superior is the owner of the company.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Reporting a superior can result in retaliation against you.
Update: You do so anonymously.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Reporting a superior can result in retaliation against you.
Update: You work for the government.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Reporting a superior can result in retaliation against you.
Update: the superior gets fired before they can retaliate
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Reporting a superior can result in retaliation against you.
Update: the superior still has power over you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: There is nothing wrong with keep private thoughts.
Update: it's something that can really help a loved one
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: There is nothing wrong with keep private thoughts.
Update: you are with people you just met
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: There is nothing wrong with keep private thoughts.
Update: The thoughts you're keeping private involve hurting other people.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: There is nothing wrong with keep private thoughts.
Update: Your thoughts are about christmas shopping.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: There is nothing wrong with keep private thoughts.
Update: By telling someone about the thoughts it would hurt their feelings.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: There is nothing wrong with keep private thoughts.
Update: You have a crush
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: There is nothing wrong with keep private thoughts.
Update: The thoughts are interfering with your work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: There is nothing wrong with keep private thoughts.
Update: It doesn't harm anyone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should get a better job if you live pay check to pay check.
Update: You are very passionate about what you do.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should get a better job if you live pay check to pay check.
Update: Money is very important to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should get a better job if you live pay check to pay check.
Update: You  are injured and can only do that one job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should get a better job if you live pay check to pay check.
Update: A new high paying company opened up near you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should get a better job if you live pay check to pay check.
Update: There is no better work available.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should get a better job if you live pay check to pay check.
Update: You have great employment options available.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should get a better job if you live pay check to pay check.
Update: you can't get a better job because you need more education first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should get a better job if you live pay check to pay check.
Update: you have the potential to earn more money doing something else.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should get a better job if you live pay check to pay check.
Update: You are stuck in the cycle of poverty and cannot get to the next rung.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should get a better job if you live pay check to pay check.
Update: You have the ability to apply for new jobs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stain your body with tattoos.
Update: You like art
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stain your body with tattoos.
Update: It makes you happy.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stain your body with tattoos.
Update: It is against your religion.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stain your body with tattoos.
Update: You're an adult and can make your own choices.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stain your body with tattoos.
Update: You are a child and don't have your parents permission.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stain your body with tattoos.
Update: the tattoos are not the permanent type.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stain your body with tattoos.
Update: the tattoos are going to be permanent.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stain your body with tattoos.
Update: You're sure you won't change your mind about the tattoo later.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't stain your body with tattoos.
Update: Your family members or friends will think less of your judgement if you get a tattoo.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to keep trying to talk to an ex who isn't responding.
Update: The ex has a restraining order against you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to keep trying to talk to an ex who isn't responding.
Update: You have children in common with this ex.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to keep trying to talk to an ex who isn't responding.
Update: They have told you to leave them alone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to keep trying to talk to an ex who isn't responding.
Update: You share custody of a child with your ex.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to keep trying to talk to an ex who isn't responding.
Update: They have a restraining order against you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to keep trying to talk to an ex who isn't responding.
Update: If they are court ordered to speak to you about shared custody issues.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to keep trying to talk to an ex who isn't responding.
Update: You have a court order to not contact them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to keep trying to talk to an ex who isn't responding.
Update: Your child together has broken their leg.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is ok to keep trying to talk to an ex who isn't responding.
Update: They have repeatedly told you to stop.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is ok to keep trying to talk to an ex who isn't responding.
Update: You have children with them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be there for your family.
Update: The requirements of work preclude your attendance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be there for your family.
Update: You just want to have fun with your friends instead of being with your family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be there for your family.
Update: You have a previous commitment at work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be there for your family.
Update: You are the executor of the will.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be there for your family.
Update: Your family disowned you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be there for your family.
Update: Your family supports you financially
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be there for your family.
Update: Your family lives out of town and you cannot get to them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be there for your family.
Update: Your family needs support during trying times.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be there for your family.
Update: You live very far from your family.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong not to be there for your family.
Update: They live in the same home as you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK that not everyone celebrates Christmas.
Update: They are Jewish.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK that not everyone celebrates Christmas.
Update: You are the priest.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK that not everyone celebrates Christmas.
Update: You celebrate Hanukkah.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK that not everyone celebrates Christmas.
Update: they're christian.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK that not everyone celebrates Christmas.
Update: they are not christian.
Update type: strengthener