tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore someone if they are ignoring you back.
Update: are simply doing so to be rude to you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore someone if they are ignoring you back.
Update: You are in the middle of performing surgery on them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore someone if they are ignoring you back.
Update: You are both sleeping.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore someone if they are ignoring you back.
Update: You're guarding a prisoner.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore someone if they are ignoring you back.
Update: You're arguing with the person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore someone if they are ignoring you back.
Update: You were in the wrong.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore someone if they are ignoring you back.
Update: You know your attention really irks them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore someone if they are ignoring you back.
Update: you have to work together on a project.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to ignore someone if they are ignoring you back.
Update: it is a stranger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to send nude pictures outside of a relationship.
Update: you are comfortable with other people seeing you nude
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to send nude pictures outside of a relationship.
Update: you are under age
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to send nude pictures outside of a relationship.
Update: You're a nude model, and it's part of your job.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to send nude pictures outside of a relationship.
Update: You've forbade your partner from sending nude pictures to others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to get involved in other people's financial issues.
Update: You're a debt counselor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to get involved in other people's financial issues.
Update: You aren't good at managing your own finances either.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to get involved in other people's financial issues.
Update: You work as a tax advisor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to get involved in other people's financial issues.
Update: They aren't comfortable talking about their income with you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to get involved in other people's financial issues.
Update: You are an accountant.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to get involved in other people's financial issues.
Update: You only offer criticism.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to get involved in other people's financial issues.
Update: You are their financial adviser.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to get involved in other people's financial issues.
Update: You obtain the information in a sneaky manner.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is rude to get involved in other people's financial issues.
Update: You are a financial advisor.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is rude to get involved in other people's financial issues.
Update: You don't know them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not speak to someone who thought you cared about them.
Update: The other person is abusive to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not speak to someone who thought you cared about them.
Update: They show you their love and kindness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not speak to someone who thought you cared about them.
Update: they are harassing you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not speak to someone who thought you cared about them.
Update: they did nothing wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not speak to someone who thought you cared about them.
Update: you've made it clear that you don't want a relationship
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not speak to someone who thought you cared about them.
Update: you've led them on
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not speak to someone who thought you cared about them.
Update: they done something unforgiveable.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not speak to someone who thought you cared about them.
Update: they need you for support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not speak to someone who thought you cared about them.
Update: you have lost your voice.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to not speak to someone who thought you cared about them.
Update: they spoke to you first.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's inconsiderate to expect someone to continue to pleasure you when their mouth is sore.
Update: You have just gotten done pleasuring them orally first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's inconsiderate to expect someone to continue to pleasure you when their mouth is sore.
Update: You have never orally pleasured them before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's inconsiderate to expect someone to continue to pleasure you when their mouth is sore.
Update: You only need them to continue for thirty more seconds.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's inconsiderate to expect someone to continue to pleasure you when their mouth is sore.
Update: They've been going for half an hour.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should help out your parents when they are having financial problems.
Update: You're not old enough to work.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should help out your parents when they are having financial problems.
Update: You have a good paying job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should help out your parents when they are having financial problems.
Update: they were abusive to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should help out your parents when they are having financial problems.
Update: they paid for your college.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should help out your parents when they are having financial problems.
Update: Your financial difficulties are worse than theirs.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should help out your parents when they are having financial problems.
Update: They are loving and supportive and you have the financial means to do so.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should help out your parents when they are having financial problems.
Update: They never make financially responsible decisions.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should help out your parents when they are having financial problems.
Update: They've helped you when you needed them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should help out your parents when they are having financial problems.
Update: you are also having financial problems.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should help out your parents when they are having financial problems.
Update: they have helped you in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get involved in your parent's business.
Update: They are doing illegal things
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get involved in your parent's business.
Update: They aren’t doing anything that hurts themselves or others
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get involved in your parent's business.
Update: They have dementia.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get involved in your parent's business.
Update: They have never gotten involved in yours.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get involved in your parent's business.
Update: They are close to a divorce.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get involved in your parent's business.
Update: They are arguing about money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get involved in your parent's business.
Update: They ask for your help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get involved in your parent's business.
Update: You are a minor child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get involved in your parent's business.
Update: they are expected to retire and hand it off to you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't get involved in your parent's business.
Update: it's not in an industry you want to be a part of
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will be surprised if a family member confronts you.
Update: you had done something to cause them harm
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will be surprised if a family member confronts you.
Update: you barely know them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will be surprised if a family member confronts you.
Update: someone forewarned you that you were going to be confronted.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will be surprised if a family member confronts you.
Update: a family member has staged an intervention.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will be surprised if a family member confronts you.
Update: You have done something unforgivable.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will be surprised if a family member confronts you.
Update: You have been supportive of them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will be surprised if a family member confronts you.
Update: You provoke the family member relentlessly.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will be surprised if a family member confronts you.
Update: The family member is a kind and loving grandmother.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will be surprised if a family member confronts you.
Update: You have been deliberately antagonizing this person
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's expected that you will be surprised if a family member confronts you.
Update: It's your spouse serving divorce papers
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset about your partner's gambling problems.
Update: they are trying to get help.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset about your partner's gambling problems.
Update: they refuse to get help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset about your partner's gambling problems.
Update: They end up ahead every time.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset about your partner's gambling problems.
Update: They are losing large sums of money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset about your partner's gambling problems.
Update: Your partner is currently getting professional help to address the problem.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset about your partner's gambling problems.
Update: Your partner lost a great sum of money from your joint bank account.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset about your partner's gambling problems.
Update: You encourage them to do it for your own benefit.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset about your partner's gambling problems.
Update: They have spent your savings on gambling.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset about your partner's gambling problems.
Update: they are actively getting treatment and making ammends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay to be upset about your partner's gambling problems.
Update: they stole money from you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Blaming others for our problems is wrong.
Update: They are actively trying to sabotage you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Blaming others for our problems is wrong.
Update: You want to overcome those problems.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Blaming others for our problems is wrong.
Update: unless they did cause the problems.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Blaming others for our problems is wrong.
Update: we know that we caused the problem.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Blaming others for our problems is wrong.
Update: It really is someone else's fault.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Blaming others for our problems is wrong.
Update: You just don't want to take responsibility for your missteps.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Blaming others for our problems is wrong.
Update: We didn't realize that the problem wasn't someone else's fault.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Blaming others for our problems is wrong.
Update: We know that we are to blame for our issues.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Blaming others for our problems is wrong.
Update: The others deliberately caused the problems.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Blaming others for our problems is wrong.
Update: The problems are our fault.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep associating with an ex.
Update: You are on good terms and have become friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep associating with an ex.
Update: You are talking to them behind your significant other's back.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep associating with an ex.
Update: You have children together.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep associating with an ex.
Update: You know they are bad about stealing and manipulating you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep associating with an ex.
Update: You share child custody and the child has a school play.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep associating with an ex.
Update: You always argue with each other.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep associating with an ex.
Update: you think you might get back together.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep associating with an ex.
Update: you're in a new relationship.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep associating with an ex.
Update: The two of you have children together and need to remain civil for their sake.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to keep associating with an ex.
Update: Your ex is still addicted to gambling and wants you to give him money.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to discuss relationship issues with your classmates.
Update: Your boyfriend or girlfriend threatened to harm themselves.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to discuss relationship issues with your classmates.
Update: Your issues are of a sensitive and embarrassing nature.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to discuss relationship issues with your classmates.
Update: You are in a class about social and personal relationships.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to discuss relationship issues with your classmates.
Update: Your friend just got dumped.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to discuss relationship issues with your classmates.
Update: You're on break
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to discuss relationship issues with your classmates.
Update: The professor is giving a lecture
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to discuss relationship issues with your classmates.
Update: it's part of an assignment.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to discuss relationship issues with your classmates.
Update: you want to maintain your privacy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to discuss relationship issues with your classmates.
Update: The relationship issues is with your classmates.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's wrong to discuss relationship issues with your classmates.
Update: It is none of their business.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we sometimes put ourselves into situations that are to much for use to handle.
Update: we put our needs in the situation above our children's
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we sometimes put ourselves into situations that are to much for use to handle.
Update: we expect to grow as people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we sometimes put ourselves into situations that are to much for use to handle.
Update: the defeat will crush us
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we sometimes put ourselves into situations that are to much for use to handle.
Update: it helps us get stronger
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we sometimes put ourselves into situations that are to much for use to handle.
Update: we do so all the time
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we sometimes put ourselves into situations that are to much for use to handle.
Update: we do so only occasionally
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we sometimes put ourselves into situations that are to much for use to handle.
Update: It could end up getting someone hurt.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we sometimes put ourselves into situations that are to much for use to handle.
Update: You are trying to learn something new.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we sometimes put ourselves into situations that are to much for use to handle.
Update: We are draining ourselves doing it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's okay that we sometimes put ourselves into situations that are to much for use to handle.
Update: It will lead to being more successful in life.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be disappointed when something you were excited about falls through.
Update: there was truly no way to prevent the event falling through
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be disappointed when something you were excited about falls through.
Update: you did not see the issue arising
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be disappointed when something you were excited about falls through.
Update: You never had a chance for it to happen
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be disappointed when something you were excited about falls through.
Update: You worked really hard to accomplish a goal
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be disappointed when something you were excited about falls through.
Update: You know that there was a high possibility of it not working out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be disappointed when something you were excited about falls through.
Update: You informed a lot of people about it and they were excited, too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be disappointed when something you were excited about falls through.
Update: it was a long shot.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be disappointed when something you were excited about falls through.
Update: you bought an outfit.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be disappointed when something you were excited about falls through.
Update: The act would have put you in danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You have a right to be disappointed when something you were excited about falls through.
Update: You worked hard on the project.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to let someone suffer.
Update: There isn't any way to help the person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to let someone suffer.
Update: You have medical supplies available that could help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to let someone suffer.
Update: that person does not wish to die
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to let someone suffer.
Update: that person wishes to die
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to let someone suffer.
Update: you have the ways and means to help them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to let someone suffer.
Update: they want to suffer.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to let someone suffer.
Update: it is someone you care about.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to let someone suffer.
Update: You would go to prison in that state for helping them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is not acceptable to let someone suffer.
Update: You are in a state with right to die laws.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to show someone your middle finger.
Update: They asked you to pose that way for a photo
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to show someone your middle finger.
Update: You're a celebrity and a young fan politely asked for an autograph
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to show someone your middle finger.
Update: You are in another country and that gesture has a different meaning.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to show someone your middle finger.
Update: You are a bus driver for children.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to show someone your middle finger.
Update: you have a cut on it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to show someone your middle finger.
Update: you are in polite company.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to show someone your middle finger.
Update: You are showing them a ring you are wearing.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to show someone your middle finger.
Update: You are holding down all the fingers around your middle finger.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's rude to show someone your middle finger.
Update: it has a cut on it and you think it might need stitches.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's rude to show someone your middle finger.
Update: It's your parent and you've done it to protest doing homework.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should discuss disagreements with other people.
Update: It would cause a physical altercation.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should discuss disagreements with other people.
Update: They are family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should discuss disagreements with other people.
Update: The people are very dangerous and illogical and just want to fight.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should discuss disagreements with other people.
Update: The people are amicable and logical and level-headed and not dangerous.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should discuss disagreements with other people.
Update: You are a cop responding to a domestic disturbance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should discuss disagreements with other people.
Update: You are a mediator in a negotiation.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should discuss disagreements with other people.
Update: You all agree minor disagreements are okay.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should discuss disagreements with other people.
Update: The disagreements threaten to tear you apart.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should discuss disagreements with other people.
Update: The person is exhibiting road rage or other out of control violent behavior.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should discuss disagreements with other people.
Update: They are people you live or work with.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: someone hurt you first.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: it is a child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: You have been called names by a person rudely
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: Others show
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: You are being taken advantage of.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: You see someone who needs help.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: people who will take advantage of your kindness are around
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: you are dealing with children who are learning how to be people
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: kindness is getting you walked on.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to be kind.
Update: you want others to treat you with kindness.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to take back ownership of your possessions.
Update: the police department is holding them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's OK to take back ownership of your possessions.
Update: it is your pet.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's OK to take back ownership of your possessions.
Update: They were taken without your permission
Update type: strengthener