tasksource/defeasible-nli huggingface dataset:
Hypothesis: It is expected to get something that you will like for valentine's day from your partner.
Update: They're jobless and don't have any money.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to get something that you will like for valentine's day from your partner.
Update: You've been hinting about it to them for months now.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to get something that you will like for valentine's day from your partner.
Update: You had an argument and split up.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to get something that you will like for valentine's day from your partner.
Update: You got them a nice gift.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to get something that you will like for valentine's day from your partner.
Update: You agree not to buy gifts.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to get something that you will like for valentine's day from your partner.
Update: You've agreed to buy gifts and gave them a list of possible gifts to buy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is expected to get something that you will like for valentine's day from your partner.
Update: YOu agreed to donate to a charity together instead.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is expected to get something that you will like for valentine's day from your partner.
Update: Your partner has always gotten you nice gifts in the past.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not get along with every member of your family.
Update: There are only a few family members left.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not get along with every member of your family.
Update: You have a large family spread across various countries
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not get along with every member of your family.
Update: They have all been very nice to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not get along with every member of your family.
Update: Some of them are obnoxiously rude to you when you see them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not get along with every member of your family.
Update: Your family is very small.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not get along with every member of your family.
Update: You have a large family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not get along with every member of your family.
Update: They all show you how much they care about you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not get along with every member of your family.
Update: Some of them tease you all of the time.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's understandable to not get along with every member of your family.
Update: Some of them have treated you badly.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You're in a play depicting the past.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You're a teacher.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You are a racial comedian
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You are the President
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You don't want people thinking you're a racist.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You support diversity.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You are an actor in a movie.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't say racist things.
Update: You are a decent human being.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be angry at a significant other.
Update: It is for something they can't control.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be angry at a significant other.
Update: They refuse to apologize.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be angry at a significant other.
Update: they did nothing to you specifically bad
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be angry at a significant other.
Update: they did something without your approval.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be angry at a significant other.
Update: They didn't do anything wrong.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be angry at a significant other.
Update: They cheated on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be angry at a significant other.
Update: you are the one who has done something wrong.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be angry at a significant other.
Update: they have cheated on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be angry at a significant other.
Update: You hold the grudge without talking it out.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is okay to be angry at a significant other.
Update: Your SO hurt you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Honesty is important in friendships.
Update: You don't care about having a good friendship.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Honesty is important in friendships.
Update: You want long lasting friendships.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Honesty is important in friendships.
Update: You have to tell a white lie.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Honesty is important in friendships.
Update: You need good feedback and support.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Honesty is important in friendships.
Update: you dont want to cause the other friend any upsetness
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Honesty is important in friendships.
Update: you want the friendship to last
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Honesty is important in friendships.
Update: you don't want to be anything more than an aquaintance.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Honesty is important in friendships.
Update: you are best friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Honesty is important in friendships.
Update: A new friend has trouble trusting others.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate with people who have betrayed others.
Update: Unless you are their therapist.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate with people who have betrayed others.
Update: Especially if they are a bad influence on you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate with people who have betrayed others.
Update: Those people have reformed and asked for forgiveness.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate with people who have betrayed others.
Update: Those people have never been apologetic
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate with people who have betrayed others.
Update: they did it for the right reasons
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate with people who have betrayed others.
Update: you have something to hide
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate with people who have betrayed others.
Update: They explain the reason for their betrayal and it is understandable.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate with people who have betrayed others.
Update: the can't provide a reason for their betrayal
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate with people who have betrayed others.
Update: They are your loved ones.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't associate with people who have betrayed others.
Update: They've betrayed you too.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for your family's best interests.
Update: You hurt others in the process.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for your family's best interests.
Update: You're terminally ill.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for your family's best interests.
Update: You are being nosy and not minding your own business.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for your family's best interests.
Update: No one else is.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for your family's best interests.
Update: Your family is very rude and toxic
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for your family's best interests.
Update: You love them very much
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for your family's best interests.
Update: They are in trouble with the law.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for your family's best interests.
Update: Your family's health is in jeopardy.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for your family's best interests.
Update: the interests are not really the best
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to look out for your family's best interests.
Update: the interest only have the best benefits
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not appropriate to attend your ex's wedding.
Update: You and your ex have remained good friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not appropriate to attend your ex's wedding.
Update: You and your ex ended things on bad terms.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not appropriate to attend your ex's wedding.
Update: You are invited by your ex.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not appropriate to attend your ex's wedding.
Update: There is still a great deal of animosity between you still.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not appropriate to attend your ex's wedding.
Update: Your ex invited you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not appropriate to attend your ex's wedding.
Update: Your partner will be jealous
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not appropriate to attend your ex's wedding.
Update: you get an invitation
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not appropriate to attend your ex's wedding.
Update: you still desire her
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's not appropriate to attend your ex's wedding.
Update: You get along well and were invited.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's not appropriate to attend your ex's wedding.
Update: You weren't invited.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be polite to people who wish you seasons greetings, even if you don't celebrate it yourself.
Update: They are doing it to be sarcastic.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be polite to people who wish you seasons greetings, even if you don't celebrate it yourself.
Update: They are ringing a bell outside of a grocery store for charity.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be polite to people who wish you seasons greetings, even if you don't celebrate it yourself.
Update: They give you a present
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be polite to people who wish you seasons greetings, even if you don't celebrate it yourself.
Update: They try to break into your home.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be polite to people who wish you seasons greetings, even if you don't celebrate it yourself.
Update: You don't want your house egged.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be polite to people who wish you seasons greetings, even if you don't celebrate it yourself.
Update: The people are doing it aggressively.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be polite to people who wish you seasons greetings, even if you don't celebrate it yourself.
Update: The person is a door greeter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be polite to people who wish you seasons greetings, even if you don't celebrate it yourself.
Update: You enjoy being perceived as mean and spiteful.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be polite to people who wish you seasons greetings, even if you don't celebrate it yourself.
Update: You have friends and family who do celebrate.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Offending your friends is not nice behavior.
Update: You are participating in a comedy roast.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Offending your friends is not nice behavior.
Update: You repeatedly offend them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Offending your friends is not nice behavior.
Update: Your friends are overly sensitive.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Offending your friends is not nice behavior.
Update: It's a serious matter.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Offending your friends is not nice behavior.
Update: They get offended over everything.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Offending your friends is not nice behavior.
Update: You do it on purpose.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Offending your friends is not nice behavior.
Update: You are a comedian making jokes at their expense for their amusement.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Offending your friends is not nice behavior.
Update: You are with others who aren't very familiar with your group of friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: Offending your friends is not nice behavior.
Update: Unless you are having a roast for your friends.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: Offending your friends is not nice behavior.
Update: They have done nothing to offend you.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make a joke about stealing.
Update: You are among friends and know that you wouldn’t actually steal anything.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make a joke about stealing.
Update: You are near children who don’t understand right from wrong.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make a joke about stealing.
Update: You are a comedian
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make a joke about stealing.
Update: The person you are saying it to had something stolen from them
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make a joke about stealing.
Update: Unless everyone knows you're kidding.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make a joke about stealing.
Update: Especially if you have stolen things before.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make a joke about stealing.
Update: You're on a comedy show.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make a joke about stealing.
Update: You're in jail.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make a joke about stealing.
Update: You are on stage.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is wrong to make a joke about stealing.
Update: You are with someone who has had their things stolen.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you're working on something as a team, you should be supportive to your teammates
Update: the teammates are trying to sabotage you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you're working on something as a team, you should be supportive to your teammates
Update: you want to foster harmony and cooperation
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you're working on something as a team, you should be supportive to your teammates
Update: They do not want you involved.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you're working on something as a team, you should be supportive to your teammates
Update: The entire team will benefit from the success of the project.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you're working on something as a team, you should be supportive to your teammates
Update: they are putting the project at risk.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you're working on something as a team, you should be supportive to your teammates
Update: you are the leader.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you're working on something as a team, you should be supportive to your teammates
Update: They are about to fail.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you're working on something as a team, you should be supportive to your teammates
Update: They are doing a good job.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you're working on something as a team, you should be supportive to your teammates
Update: The star teammates do most of the scoring.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you're working on something as a team, you should be supportive to your teammates
Update: You want to win through coordinated actions.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you do not want a dog in the house, you should not get a dog.
Update: Your 3 other roommates all agree that they will take care of the costs, food and cleaning.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you do not want a dog in the house, you should not get a dog.
Update: You know you won't be able to afford potential vet bills
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you do not want a dog in the house, you should not get a dog.
Update: Someone in your household already has a dog.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you do not want a dog in the house, you should not get a dog.
Update: You're allergic to dogs.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you do not want a dog in the house, you should not get a dog.
Update: you provide a heated dog house
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you do not want a dog in the house, you should not get a dog.
Update: you don't have a nice yard
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you do not want a dog in the house, you should not get a dog.
Update: a family member needs a service dog.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you do not want a dog in the house, you should not get a dog.
Update: you live alone.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: If you do not want a dog in the house, you should not get a dog.
Update: Your friend needs you to take care of their dog for a few weeks.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: If you do not want a dog in the house, you should not get a dog.
Update: You can't afford pet food and vet care.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cut off contact with someone just because they are disabled.
Update: You are a disease carrier and their immunities are comproised form their body dealing with the disability.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cut off contact with someone just because they are disabled.
Update: They are  member of your immediate family.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cut off contact with someone just because they are disabled.
Update: you don't want to labeled negatively.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cut off contact with someone just because they are disabled.
Update: you are a nice person.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cut off contact with someone just because they are disabled.
Update: They have stolen money from you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cut off contact with someone just because they are disabled.
Update: They are your child.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cut off contact with someone just because they are disabled.
Update: They are cruel to you.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You shouldn't cut off contact with someone just because they are disabled.
Update: You have been close friends.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not tattle on your friends.
Update: They harmed someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not tattle on your friends.
Update: What they did was harmless.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not tattle on your friends.
Update: they are hurting somebody.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not tattle on your friends.
Update: they were not really doing anything serious.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not tattle on your friends.
Update: Your friends have broken the law or put you in danger.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not tattle on your friends.
Update: They would retaliate against you in the worst way.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not tattle on your friends.
Update: Your friend killed someone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not tattle on your friends.
Update: Your friend is only being annoying and not harmful.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should not tattle on your friends.
Update: One of them needs immediate medical attention.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should not tattle on your friends.
Update: The offense is so minor the teacher doesn't even want to waste time dealing with.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be compassionate when a significant other is having nightmares.
Update: You told them not to watch that scary movie that caused them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be compassionate when a significant other is having nightmares.
Update: You really love them, they can use your support to help get back to sleep.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be compassionate when a significant other is having nightmares.
Update: You're at work while they're asleep.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be compassionate when a significant other is having nightmares.
Update: You're awake at home while they're asleep.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be compassionate when a significant other is having nightmares.
Update: You always get accidentally punched in the face when they happen
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be compassionate when a significant other is having nightmares.
Update: They wake up scared every time
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be compassionate when a significant other is having nightmares.
Update: They will not get help for the condition.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: You should be compassionate when a significant other is having nightmares.
Update: They have never had night terrors.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: You should be compassionate when a significant other is having nightmares.
Update: They have insomnia because of it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to notify people of your plans.
Update: You're staying at home alone.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to notify people of your plans.
Update: You're going out hiking.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to notify people of your plans.
Update: The plans are a surprise.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to notify people of your plans.
Update: You are leaving town for a couple of days.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to notify people of your plans.
Update: You no longer want to associate with that person.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to notify people of your plans.
Update: They are trying to come up with their own schedule.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to notify people of your plans.
Update: you suspect they are stalking you
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to notify people of your plans.
Update: you are going off alone on a long, dangerous hike
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It's good to notify people of your plans.
Update: You want to surprise them.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It's good to notify people of your plans.
Update: It will affect them.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset when someone takes and uses something that belongs to you.
Update: you gave them permission.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset when someone takes and uses something that belongs to you.
Update: you watch them break it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset when someone takes and uses something that belongs to you.
Update: You said they could use it
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset when someone takes and uses something that belongs to you.
Update: They didn’t ask you to use it first
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset when someone takes and uses something that belongs to you.
Update: You told them they could use it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset when someone takes and uses something that belongs to you.
Update: They broke it.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset when someone takes and uses something that belongs to you.
Update: you told them they could borrow your item as long as they return it in the same condition they got it.
Update type: weakener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset when someone takes and uses something that belongs to you.
Update: they didn't ask your permission to take the item.
Update type: strengthener
Hypothesis: It is understandable to be upset when someone takes and uses something that belongs to you.
Update: You offered the item to them for use.
Update type: weakener