I had demonstrated by repeated experiments that inoculations of yellow fever blood into animals--dogs, rabbits, guinea pigs--gives a negative result. However, this negative result might be because these animals are not susceptible to the disease. In the civil hospital in Vera Cruz in 1887, Dr. Daniel Ruiz ran a single inoculation experiment on a man. But, this experiment was inconclusive because the patient from whom the blood was obtained was in the eigth day of the disease, and it was quite possible that the specific germ was destoyed at that point. These were the facts surrounding yellow fever when Dr. Reed and his associates commenced their investigations in Cuba during the summer of 1900. In a preliminary note read at the meeting of the American Public Health Association, October 22, 1900, the board gave a report of three cases of yellow fever which they believed to be direct results of mosquito inoculations

The speaker of this story is a scientist.


The speaker of the story was unable to run experiments.


Dogs and other animals can be injected with blood that contains yellow fever.


Inoculations of yellow fever into rabbits gives a positive result.


Inoculations of yellow fever into chickens gives a negative result.


The speaker only ran one experiment of injecting yellow fever blood into animals.


Dogs are not susceptible to yellow fever.


The speaker of this story is Dr. Daniel Ruiz.


Dr. Daniel Cruz was in Vera Cruz at some point.


The speaker of the story was in Vera Cruz at some point.


Dr. Daniel Cruz ran multiple innoculation experiments.


The speaker of the story suggests that yellow fever in the human body may be destroyed after some period of time.


Dr. Daniel Cruz took blood from a sick patient to run his experiment.


Dr Daniel Cruz was in Cuba with Dr. Reed.


Dr. Reed and Dr. Cruz both study yellow fever.


Dr. Reed and his associates believed that mosquitos causes three cases of yellow fever.


The American Public Health Association did not exist until 1920.


The writer of this paragraph is trying to understand how Yellow Fever spreads to different animals.


Until Dr. Reed’s studies, the results on Yellow Fever were largely inconclusive.


The investigations were not conducted in the United States.


The scientists did not believe that the yellow fever was a direct result from mice infestations.


Inoculation experiments were ran on a man in Vera Cruz.


Vera Cruz was in a civil hospital in 1887.


It is believed that yellow fever resulted from a mosquito's natural feeding pattern.


Studies in Cuba regarding yellow fever began in the early 20th century.


Dr. Mario Ruiz performed a single inoculation experiment on an animal.


Dog, rabbit and guinea pigs have a positive result to inoculations.


Animals might not be susceptible to the disease because of their negative thought pattern.


The point of the experiment was to destroy a specific germ.


Dr. Daniel Ruiz ran multiple experiments on a man.


Dr. Ruiz and Dr. Reed did their experiments at the same time.


Ruiz's experiment yielded definitive new findings about yellow fever


Ruiz's experiment did not yield definitive new findings about yellow fever


Daniel Ruiz performed experiments on dogs, rabbits, and guinea pigs.


Daniel Ruiz performed experiments on human beings.


Daniel Ruiz worked in a medical facility.


Daniel Ruiz worked in a military facility.


The writer of this paragraph performed experiments on mammals.


The writer of this paragraph performed experiments on birds.


A medical professional inoculated a person with blood from an organism that had contracted an illness as an experiment


There was at least one private hospital in Vera Cruz prior to the turn of the 20th century.


Dr. Ruiz ran experiments on pigs by inoculating them against scarlet fever in the civil hosputal un Vera Cruz in 1887


Dr. Reed inoculated a person in the civil hospital in Vera Cruz in 1900.


The American Public Health Association met in late October in the year 1900 to discuss the negative results of my repeated experiments attempting to innoculate animals with yellow fever.


In October 1900 the American Public Health Association witnessed a report of three cases of yellow fever which they believed to be the result of guinea pig inoculations.


It's plausible that the yellow fever germs may be destroyed by the eight day of a patient's having yellow fever.


Once a patient has had yellow fever for a week, the germs in their body have already been destroyed.


I attempted to innoculate dogs with yellow fever more than once.


Dr. Reed's associates began in Cuba to investigate yellow fever after I had run my experiments on innoculating animals with fever blood.


The blood that Dr. Ruiz used for his human medical experiment was from a person who's fever was more than a week old.


Dr. Daniel Ruiz had never been bitten by a mosquito or a dog before moving to Vera Cruz.


Dr. Daniel Cruz worked at a hospital in Vera Ruiz.


Someone associated with the American Public Health association reported that more than two cases of yellow fever likely resulted from mosquitos.


Some mammals may be unable to contract yellow fever.


Before 1887, I showed that man cannot be inoculated with yellow fever.


I met Daniel Reed at annual meeting of the American Public Health Association in October 1900.


The report read at the meeting in October 2900 was a final version


Rabbits, dogs, mosquitos, and guinea pigs have been historically important for studying yellow fever.


The board of the APHA reported on the status of mosquito inoculations for yellow fever in 1900.


People previously thought that injecting infected blood into animals may make them immune to yellow fever.


Doctors tried to make patients immune to yellow fever by injecting them with the blood of healthy humans.


After the experiment at Vera Cruz, it was still thought to be possible to immunize people against yellow fever by injecting them with infected blood.


Dr. Reed's experiments in Cuba did not yield any new data.


The single experiment on a man by Ruiz occurred seven years after the 80th year of the nineteenth century.


It was called yellow fever because the blood of the animals i.e. dogs, rabbits, and guinea pigs, was yellow


The investigations in Cuba occurred during the last year of the nineteenth century in the month after spring.


The inoculation experiment run by Dr Ruiz was not useful as it occurred aftere the American Public Health association's meeting referencing mosquito inoculations.


The evidence available so far does not suggest that the vector of transmission for yellow fever is not the mosquito


The experiments on animals and the experiment on humans were negative for the same reason: that all test candidates involved did not have the germ present in their blood streams.


In some places the wires came very near together, and in others the spaces between them were so wide, that Wallace thought that the squirrel, if by any chance he should ever get put into the cage, would be very likely to squeeze his way out. Then, besides, Phonny had not measured his wires in respect to length, but had cut them off of various lengths, taking care however not to have any of them too short. The result was that the ends of the wires projected to various distances above the board, presenting a ragged and unworkmanlike appearance.

The wires were near together in all places.


The wires had large spaces between them in all places.


The wires had small spaces between them in some places.


If Wallace should ever be put into the cage, he would surely be able to escape.


If Phonny should ever be put into the cage, he would surely be able to escape.


Wallace measured the wires with respect to length.


Phonny cut the wires uneven and some if them were too short. .


the man had a ragged and unworkmanlike appearance


The ends of the wires projected to various distances above the board, presenting a ragged and unworkmanlike appearance.


The cage and the surrounding pieces were poorly constructed.


The cage and the surrounding pieces were well constructed.


A squirrel did not make it into the cage.


At the moment, no squirrel had made it into the cage


A skinny squirrel may be able to escape.


A very fat squirrel would stay in the trap.


The appearance of the wires was not smooth and refined.


Wallace had not measured his wires in respect to length and had cut them off of various lengths.


The wires were not presented in an incompetent and rough appearance.


Phonny is not the best worksman when it comes to building squirrel cages.


There were zero wires that were cut too short.


Wallace considered it around 75% certain that the squirrel could squeeze out of the cage.


The lengths of the wires were all consistent


The lengths of the wires were not consistent


Wallace thought the cage would work well.


Wallace thought that the cage would not work well.


Phonny and Wallace had both seen the squirrel cage.


All the wires of the cage were very close to each other.


The majority of the cage wires were widely spaced


Wallace believes it was unlikely that the cage would ever contain the squirrel


Phonny had taken great care to build a very beautiful cage for his pet squirrel, except for the fact that many of the wires he cut were too short.


Phonny built a cage for a squirrel although Wallace felt it was not very likely the cage would ever entrap one


Phonny used plant matter and metal to construct a container.


There was a rodent known to Wallace and Phonny who would probably be able to give Phonny's cage a slip.


Because the metal threads comprising the cage were ill spaced, they probably couldn't keep an animal the size of a squirrel contained within.


Wallace would think that the cage would do a bad job keeping a small baby mouse trapped.


The squirrel was watching Wallace construct the cage from a tree.


There was a specific squirrel that Phonny constructed a cage to catch.


Phonny is aware of at least one animal that they feel ought to be caught.


To build a better container, one should first measure the material they are using for bars and none are too long or too short.


Squirrels are known for squeezing into spaces between things.


If Phonny tried to put Wallace in the cage he probably would not fit.


Before Phonny built the cage, he had to cut wires to particular lengths.


While Wallace was building the cage, he thrust wires through the board.


The board that Phonny had pushed wires through was too wide to fit in the cage.


Phonny had already caught the squirrel once, but it had escaped again.


Many rodents had been in Phonny's cage before.


Wallace had only seen one squirrel before in his life and it had been very wide across the middle and was living in a wire cage.


Phonny always cut wires in a ragged way.


The squirrel was really happy living in a cage that Phonny built for it.


The squirrel cage was made of things including at least long and skinny cylindrical tubes or flat wide planks.


There were cylindrical objects of various lengths that have been cut by Phonny.


If Wallace had made the object, he would have measured the length of metal pieces and cut them carefully, so that none were too short.


There was a ragged but workmanlike squirrel who wanted to be captured by Phonny.


Phonny had carefully measured his materials to make the cage look professionally crafted.


The workmanship of the cage was of the very highest level


When constructing a squirrel cage, you should aim to have equal wire lengths and constant gaps to ensure good quality.


The squirrel's owner, Phonny, will probably not use the cage as they fear that the squirrel might escape.


The main concern with the cage is that some of the wires cut off of various lengths are not sufficiently long.


The water was wide and deep, so that he could not cross it. Tony, however, went down to the brink of the water, and got a good drink. This refreshed him very much, and then he went back again up the bank, and lay down upon the grass there to rest. Presently two cows came down to the water, on the side opposite to where Tony was sitting.


He could not cross the water because it was too wide and deep. .


He could cross the water because it was wide and deep.


He crossed the river and then got a good drink from the river bank.


Tony crossed the river and rested in the grass.


The first thing that refreshed tony was seeing the cows.


The cows and Tony were on the same side of the river.


The cows and Tony were on the opposite side of the River.


The cows were at the river after Tony. .


Tony’s nap on the grass is what refreshed him.


Tony is miles from the nearest water source.


Two animals came close to where tony was sitting.


Two mammals came close to where tony was sitting.


Tony went back up to the bank with the energy from drinking water.


There was more than one animal that came down to the water next to Tony.


Tony crossed the water slide and drank the water.


Tony owns the cows drinking from the deep water


He didn't stay by the river bank after he got a drink.


Tony rode one of the cows to the other side of the water.


Tony decided to find a boat to cross the water with.


The river was 15 feet across to the other side.


Two cows came down to the water, and then a third come after a few moments.


Drinking the water made Tony feel better.


Drinking the water made Tony feel worse.


The cows are on the same side of the river as Tony


The cows are not on the same side of the river as Tony


There was grass around a financial institution that Tony rested near.


There was a bridge over the wide and deep water that Tony could have crossed.


The river could not be crossed by either Tony or cows.


A person was thirsty until they went down to the water's edge.


Tony had a bad drink near some cows that made him thirstier.


Resting on the grass also refreshed Tony.


After the cows came down to the water, they went up to the bank again.


Tony didn't manage to imbibe enough at the water's edge.


Tony sat on top of a cow on the river bank.


A cow sat on Tony inside a financial institution.


There was deep water between Tony and the cows.


There was water deeper than a cow is tall between Tony and two cows.


One of the cows was a baby of the other cow.


Tony has been in repose on top of grass in his life.


Two cows presented themselves across from Tony.


If there had been a bridge over the wide and deep water, Tony could've crossed over to get a closer look at the cows.


After having some water, Tony rested on a bank.


The cows approached the water from above on the bank.


After Tony lay down on the grass to rest, he sat up again.


Tony was getting a drink when two cows came.


If Tony wanted to get away from the cows, a bridge would have been useful.


There were more cows than humans by the water.


Tony lay down on the grass near the water's edge.


The cows were closer to the water than Tony was while he was resting.


Tony could touch the water from where he was lying.


A fierce onslaught was made against Alvinczy's position by Massena's corps. It was entirely unsuccessful, and the French were repulsed with the serious loss of three thousand men. Bonaparte's position was now even more critical than it had been at Castiglione; he had to contend with two new Austrian armies, one on each flank, and Wurmser with a third stood ready to sally out of Mantua in his rear. If there should be even partial cooeperation between the Austrian leaders, he must retreat. But he felt sure there would be no cooeperation whatsoever

There was cooperation between the Austrian leaders


There was not cooperation between the Austrian leaders.


The French were happy with the losses during the attack led by Massena.


Alvinczy's defense against Massena was considered to be succesful.


Bonaparte's position was more critical because he had lost thousands of men.


The french lost the battle between Massena and Alvinczy.


There was cooperation between the Austrian leaders.


Massena’s life was entirely unsuccessful


The french lost less than four thousand men.


The french lost more than two thousand men.


The fierce onslaught was entirely successful.


Losing three thousand men was an inconsequential loss for the French.


Losing three thousand men was a serious loss for French.


Bonaparte’s position at Castiglione was critical. .


Bonaparte was under attack by three different armies. .


The Austrians are enemies of Bonaparte’s.


Both of Bonaparte’s flanks are under attack.


Neither of Bonaparte’s flanks are under attack.


If there should be even partial cooperation between the Austrian leaders, Bonaparte must retreat.


If there should be even partial cooperation between the Austrian leaders, Wurmser must retreat.


Wurmser felt sure there would be no cooperation.


Bonaparte felt sure there would be no cooperation.


Massena lost more than two thousand people in a failed attack against the Austrians.


Alvinczy and Massena fought on the French side of the conflict.


Bonaparte's military position was unchanged after Castiglione.


Bonaparte had to contend with more than two but less than three armies after Massena attacked Alvinczy's position.


Full cooperation of the Austrian armies was necessary to force a retreat by Bonaparte.


Wurmser's Austrian army was capable of leaving Mantua.


Wurmser and his army was stationed in Massena.


Three military units were stationed to Bonaparte's front in the city of Alvinczy.


The French army was disgusting during Massena's onslaught on Alvinczy.


There were multiple leaders associated with Austria.


Alvinczy's warriors pushed Massena back during the onslaught.


Massena's troops attacked Alvinczy's troops.


The position held by Alvinczy was unsuccessfully attacked by a French corps.


If Austrian leaders fully cooperate, Bonaparte must retreat.


If Austrian leaders fully cooperate, Bonaparte can retreat.


If there should be even partial cooperation between the Austrian leaders, Bonaparte won't be able to retreat.


If Austrian leaders don't cooperate, Bonaparte can retreat.


If Austrian leaders don't cooperate, Bonaparte must retreat.


If Bonaparte retreats, there will be partial cooperation between the Austrian leaders


If Bonaparte partially retreats, the Austrian leaders must cooperate


Bonaparte had already fought once against the Australian army at Castiglione.


Wurmser was in Castiglione ready to sally out and attack Bonaparte.


Bonaparte was French and had to contend with more than one Austrian army at his flanks.


Bonaparte was French and had to contend with less than two Austrian armies at his flanks.


Bonaparte was French and had to contend with exactly two Austrian army at his flanks.


Before the loss of three thousand men, the position of the French troops was hardly as critical as it had been at Castiglione.


Before the loss of three thousand men, the position of the French troops was much better as it had been at Castiglione.


Bonaparte's army fought at Castiglione after the battle between Alvinczy and Massena.


Bonaparte felt sure he would be overcome by more than two Austrian armies.


During the fight between Massena and Alvinczy, the former lost between two and four thousand soldiers.


During the fight between Massena and Alvinczy, the latter lost between two and four thousand soldiers.


There were opposing armies on the left, right, and behind the position of the French leeadr who had also battled in Castiglione.


Bonaparte's next steps will be decided based on his expectation about the cooperation between Wurmser and the other Austrian leader.


In Alvinczy vs Massena, the person defending came out on top.


Bonaparte contended his next steps based on the positions of 3.14159 Austrian armies with no expected cooperation whatsoever.


The death of Socrates was brought under three of his enemies--Lycon, Meletus, and Anytus, the last a man of high rank and reputation in the state. Socrates was accused by them of despising the ancient gods of the state, introducing new divinities and corrupting the youth of Athens. He was charged with having taught his followers, young men of the first Athenian families, to despise the established government, to be turbulent and seditious, and his accusors pointed to Alcibiades and Critias, notorious for their lawlessness, as examples of the fruits of his teaching.

Anytus was a man of high rank and reputation in the state


Lycon was a man of high rank and reputation in the state


Meletus was a man of high rank and reputation in the state


Socrates was a man of high rank and reputation in the state


Lycon accused Socrates of despising the ancient gods


Meletus accused Socrates of despising the ancient gods


Lycon accused Meletus of despising the ancient gods


Socrates accused Lycon of despising the ancient gods


Some people said Socrates corrupted the youth of Athens


Socrates had followers who were young men from Athens


Anytus had followers who were young men from Athens


Some of Socrates's followers were known for their lawlessness


The ancient gods despised the youth of Athens


The youth of Athens despised the ancient gods


Some people thought Socrates despised the ancient gods


Lycon, Meletus, and Anytus wanted to defend the Athenian government


Lycon, Meletus, and Anytus despised the Athenian government


Lycon knew about the activities of Alcibiades and Critias


Socrates's death was brought under three of his friends


Alcibiades and Critias were students of Socrates


Lyon, Meletus, and Anytus pointed to two of Socrates students as evidence of his wrongdoing


Socrates was accused of teaching Lycon to despite the established government


Socrates was found not guilty for the charges raised by Lycon, Meletus, and Anytus


Socrates was found guilty for the charges raised by Lycon, Meletus, and Anytus


The death of Socrates was brought under natural causes


Lycon, Meletus, and Anytus were students of Socrates


Accusations towards Socrates was that he wanted his followers to embrace the government, even if it caused turbulence with others


Socrates was blamed for Alcibiades and Critias' behavior.


Socrates used to teach fruit to dispise the ancient gods.


The established government in Socrates' time was turbulent, seditious, and lawless.


Some of the youth of Athens subjected themselves to Socrates' influence willingly.


Pointing at Alcibiades would be considered seditious.


The state wanted to adopt new gods to heighten its reputation.


Lycon, Meletus, and Anytus were lawful despite being enemies of Socrates.


Socrates accused Critias of lawless and being an example of his teaching.


All the young men of the first Athenian families despised the establishment.


Socrates accused Meletus, Lycon, and Anytus of teaching followers to see the established government as divine.


Athens was corrupted by the old men who taught Socrates law.


Exemplars of Socrates' students include Critias and Alcibiades.


There were second and third Athenian families.


Socrates often sold the vegetables of his teaching.


Socrates was charged with having taught his followers.


Meletus, Anytus and Lycon often pointed at vegetables to accuse Socrates of sedition.


They said Socrates despised youthful corruption.


Some Athenians felt youth should not be corrupted.


The enemies of Socrates felt that Critias was lawless but not seditious and thatt Alcibiades was notorious but not turbulent.


Socrates did in fact dispise the ancient gods.


Lycon and Anytus were examples of Socrates' teaching.


Socrates died after his last student, Anytus, achieved high rank in the government.


Meletus thought Alcibiades and Critias' anarchic tendencies were a product of their education.


Lycon thought people can be trained into wanting to commit lawless acts.


New divinities were thought to have a corrupting influence on youth, according to the enemies of Socrates.


Anytus had a reputation in the state during Socrates' time.


Not following laws is what some students of Socrates were known for.


Michael had ten aunts and uncles from his father's side.


The fresh air and healthy food that come with living in the countryside were critical to Faraday's future discoveries.


James moved his family from Surrey to a quadrangle named after a city and a street named after a king.


The daughter of a farmer married the third son of a Yorkshire blacksmith in 1786.


Garrity was the most sinister figure in organized baseball. Once a newspaper reporter, he had somehow obtained control of the Rockets by chicanery and fraud. Sympathy and gratitude were sentiments unknown to him. He would work a winning pitcher to death, and then send the man shooting down to the minors the moment he showed the slightest symptom of weakness. He scoffed at regulations and bylaws; he defied restraint and control; he was in a constant wrangle with other owners and managers; and as a creator of discord and dissension he held the belt.


He obtained control of the Rockets through honest means.


Garrity controversially obtained control of the Rockets.


Garrity was a stickler when it came to following the rules


Garrity got along with the other managers and owners


at the yearly meeting for all of baseball's owners, Garrity is often the most well-liked guy in the room.


Garrity has worked in baseball his entire life


Garrity liked to manage his players so that they have long careers


When the Rockets were owned by Garrity, people hated them but they were succesful


When it comes to being a jerk, Garrity held the belt


The team that Garrity owns is a part of unorganized baseball.


Garrity changed the named of the team to the rockets.


Garrity's players often showed signs of weakness


Garrity was in a constant wrangle with himself.


Garrity downgraded his pitchers to the minors whenever they won games.


Garrity's team won first place each year


Garrity was the least sinister figure in organized baseball.


Garrity worked in media before becoming a baseball team owner.


Garrity worked in media after becoming a baseball team owner.


Players who worked for Garrity got tired out.


Players who worked for Garrity found it relaxing.


Garrity demoted players who showed weakness.


Garrity killed players who showed weakness.


Garrity shot players who showed weakness.


Garrity wrote many regulations and bylaws.


No one in organized baseball was more sinister than Garrity.


Garrity wrest control of the Rockets from its previous manager using violent means.


Garitty was the only person to own and/or manage the Rockets in the history of the baseball team.


Garrity was skilled at sowing dissention among sportsmen and decision makers.


Even when a pitcher had contributed positively to the Rockets winning games, if Garrity though that pitcher might be faltering, he would demote him to a lower league very quickly.


Garrity was a newspaper reporter at the same time as when he controlled the Rockets baseball team.


Garrity was the most sinister figure in disorganized baseball.


Regulations, bylaws, restraint and control were treated just like discord and dissention by Garrity.


Before running the Rockets, Garrity worked as a winning pitcher.


As a creator of discord and dissention, Garrity defied the other owners and managers, and scoffed at them.


Whenever a pitcher sowed dissention or defied restraint, Garrity organized the other owners and managers to make him into a newspaper reporter.


After Garrity began to control the Rockets, he was paid for his work despite being difficult to work with.


For a time, Garrity was related to the Rockets baseball team by his employment.


The Rockets were an organized baseball team that was not part of the minor league.


Garrity took over the Rockets by decieving and tricking other people.


Garrity had control over some players' careers.


Garrity was a reporter while he was in baseball.


Some people in baseball were not cooperative with others.


The winning pitched was tested until his heart physically stopped beating.


Garrity owned a restrained leather belt that he held tightly in his hands while working winning pitchers to death.


It is possible to seize oversight of a baseball team through dishonest means.


Garrity believed that regulations and bylaws provided a useful source of restraint and control.


Sound is due to the vibrations of objects. A piano string produces sound because of its vibration when struck, or pulled to one side and then released. This vibration sets the air in rapid motion, and the result is the recording of the sound on our ear-drums. In old telephones, this recording corresponds to a film of sheepskin or bladder drawn over a hollow cup or cylinder. When the head of a drum is struck with a small stick it vibrates. In this case the vibrations are set in motion by the blow, while in the telephone a similar phenomenon is the result of vibratory waves falling from the voice on the thin membrane, or disk of metal, in the transmitter. When these vibrations reach the ear-drum the nervous system, corresponding to electricity in the mechanical telephone, carries this sound to our brains where it is recorded and understood. In the telephone the wire, charged with electricity, carries the sound from one place to another.

Sound is due to the vibration of objects.


Sound is due to the vibration of pianos.


Light is due to the vibration of objects.


Sound is due to the luminescence of objects.


Pianos are capable of sending air into rapid motion


The eye is responsible for recording sound


Ear-drums can record the sound produce by vibrating piano strings


The equivalent of the ear-drum in old telephones is a film of sheepskin or bladder


The head of a drum and the strings of a piano are similar in that they both vibrate


Piano strings are struck using a drum stick.


Telephones record vibratory waves coming from human voices.


Telephones record sound using disks of metal or membranes.


The passage compares the electricity in telephones with the nervous system of the human body.


Telephones are able to transport sound from one location to another.


When a piano string is pulled to one side and held, it will produce sound.


Our ear drums can hear sound when the vibration of air is in slow motion.


A piano string is not made of sheepskin.


Sound utilized the forces of gravity to produce audible noise.


electricity is a vehicle that carries sound in telephones.


Without vibration there can be no sound.


Telephone wires are electrically conductive.


Sound is due to signals in the brain, when an object hits a sound it vibrates the brain.


Vibrations from pianos, telephones, and drums are created by striking each object.


Piano strings, like drums, vibrate when struck


Telephones, drums, and pianos create sounds that at some point can travel to our ear drums.


there may be a disk of metal in the telephone transmitter.


The head of a drum only vibrates when hit with a small stick and not a large stick.


Vibrations reaching the eardrum allow you to hear.


Vibrations can be created only through electricity.


A sheep's bladder is drawn over a hollow cup in old telephones.


A disk of metal is transmitted through a telephone.


The wire from a phone sends sound through the use of vibration.


Sounds carried to the brain are digitally recorded through electricity.


Antique telephones use animal skin or organs to record sound.


When objects vibrate in the vacuum of space sound is generated.


Striking a piano string makes vibrations reach our eardrums through the air.


Telephones used to have film stretched over something hollow inside of them.


The effect of a drumstick on a drum head is analogous to when a voice is transmitted through a telephone.


Ears contain membranes for catching vibrations and transmitting them to the nervous system.


Telephones used to be made from sheep's bladders.


Human brains can understand vibrations on the ear-drum and recover the voice that the vibrations resulted from.


Electric pianos also make vibrations in the air.


Brains can record sounds that thave been carried by the nervous system.


Sheepskins vibrate to convey vocal information to pianos.


Sheep vibrate when they hear sounds from pianos.


When sound falls on a metal disk in a telephone, that is similar to humans hearing voices with ears.


The ear drum is connected to the nervous system


The nervous system reaches the telephone with electricity.


Electric hollow cups carry vibrations to the ear-drums of sheep.


Sheep put their ears next to drums to hear the vibrations they make.


Telephones are made of at least wires or metal disks.


Sound is transmitted over space by the electrically-charged wires in a telephone.


Striking a sheep with a small stick turns it into a telephone.


Cylinders are hollow inside like cups are.


Sound can be carried to our brains by sheep.


Modern telephones use a film of sheepskin or a bladder drawn over a hollow cylinder to transmit sound vibrations.


Sound can be in multiple places over time if it passes over an electrically charged telephone wire.


Thick membranes can't be vibrated by striking blows.


Telephones can record sounds using a membrane.


Telephones are usually made of vibrating skin.


Old telephones weren't powered by electricity.


The vibrations of a drum are set into motion by a blow striking its surface.


The sound of a piano string is produced by the vibration of our eardrums.


Electricity is necessary for telephones to work.


Old telephones work by hitting the eardrum with a small stick.


The telephone carries sound to our brains.


A piano produces sound because the keys vibrate when they are struck by the pianist.


An ear drum provides the same operational functionality as a piano string in the context of sound.


Sound can be carried by vibratory waves or electric signals.


If an object falls to the earth in atmospheric conditions, it can never produce sound.


There are other signs of a coming change in the weather known less generally. When birds of long flight, such as swallows and others, hang about home and fly low—rain or wind may be expected. Also when animals seek sheltered places, instead of spreading over their usual range: when pigs carry straw to their sties; and when smoke from chimneys does not ascend readily, an unfavourable change may be looked for. Dew, on the other hand, is an indication of fine weather. So is fog. Neither of of these two formations occurs under an overcast sky, or when there is much wind.


If birds are flying low, it is likely to be sunny soon


If birds are flying low, it is likely to be rainy or windy soon


Pigs carrying straw to their sties can cause rain


When animals seek shelter, bad weather may be on the horizon.


When chimney smoke ascends readily the weather is fine.


There are many signs of coming weather changes.


Animals are a way to detect weather changes.


When chimney smoke ascends readily then calm weather is ahead.


An indication of fine weather is dew and fog.


Pigs bringing straw home might make you think that they're forecasting bad things.


Swallows are good forecasters in that they can predict precipitation.


When animals seek shelter bad weather is on its way.


Pigs carry straw to their sties when bad weather is on its way.


Dew is able to form under an overcast sky.


All signs of weather change are generally known.


Animals out in the open signal bad weather.


Swallows are considered birds of making short trips.


When one swallows food, rain or wind may be expected.


Swallowing too aggressively can cause dew.


Bird of long flight that hang about home and fly low can cause rain


In good weather, animals spread over their usual range


Mountain Dew is an indication of good weather


One can predict changes in the weather to some degree if they have the knowledge of signs.


When pigs are flying low, you should expect wind.


Dew and fog are indications of unfavorable weather change.


When pigs ascend readily from chimneys and fly low, that is an indication of fine weather.


Birds that fly for a long time can be a good signal of weather changes.


Animals seek shelter when a favorable change in the weather is coming.


Birds are animals that can be used to predict the future weather with reasonable success.


When smoke doesn't spread upward out of a chimney, the weather will likely worsen.


Animals usually spread over a particular range.


When birds carry straw to the chimney, the weather will not change.


When birds anticipate rain or wind, they don't fly as far as usual.


Drinking Mountain Dew with a straw in the rain is a lesser known way of favoring it.


Chimney smoke can generate enough wind to lift straw into the homes of swallows.


When smoke from chimneys descends or hangs bad weather is probably coming your way.


No weather formations can occur in very windy conditions.


Some signs of changing weather are very well known.


When weather is about to change, there are often signs.


Smoke can come from chimneys or pig sties.


Pigs hang around home when it's going to rain but don't carry anything to their sties.


Indications of fine weather are at hand, including fog and dew.


Swallows are the only birds capable of flying long distances away from home.


Pigs only leave their sties to fly in fog.


Flying pigs is in general a strong indication of fine weather.


One should generally expect rain or wind.


The Southern Planters were net exporters.


Webster was consistently against low tariffs and was a firm supporter of high tariffs throughout.


Tariff taxation boosts the local economy by generating income for the importing country and providing local producers with a competitive advantage.


In the beginning it was not the Federalist merchants of New England who were discontent with the government's policies but the planters of the south.


When the system does not impose tariff taxation it is often referred to as free trade, but the objects being traded are not actually free.


Webster was New England's foremost man at Washington who was involved in < 3 votes on the tariffs.


Michael Faraday was born at Newington, Surrey, on September 22, 1791, and was the third of four children. His father, James Faraday, was the son of Robert and Elizabeth Faraday, of Clapham Wood Hall, in the north-west of Yorkshire, and was brought up as a blacksmith. He was the third of ten children, and, in 1786, married Margaret Hastwell, a farmer's daughter. Soon after his marriage he came to London, where Michael was born. In 1796 James Faraday, with his family, moved from Newington, and took rooms over a coach-house in Jacob's Well Mews, Charles Street, Manchester Square. In looking at this humble abode one can scarcely help thinking that the Yorkshire blacksmith and his little family would have been far happier in a country house than in their new crowded London one, however, had he remained in the countryside, it is difficult to see how the genius of young Michael could have met with the requisites for its development.


Michael Faraday was born in the 18th century


Michael Faraday's father was named Robert


Michael Faraday's father was named Elizabeth


Michael Faraday's father was named Clapham


Michael Faraday's father was named James


Michael Faraday's father was raised as a blacksmith


James Faraday was the third of ten children


Michael Faraday's wife was named Margaret Hastwell


Michael's parents were not married when he was born


Michael lived in a coach-house in Jacob's Well Mews in 1792


Michael could have developed well in a countryside house


Michael's development was likely owed to the family moving to crowded London home


Michael Faraday was the fourth child and was born in September of 1791.


Michael was from Clapham Wood Hall, in the north-east of Yorkshire.


James Faraday had many siblings and was the last born out of ten.


Michael was born in Newington before moving to Charles Street in Manchester Square.


James has lived in the country and city.


Mihael has lived in the country and city.


Michael Faraday's father married to a farmer's daughter.


Michael Faraday's father is son of Robert and Elizabeth Faraday


Michael Faraday is part of blacksmith family


Michael Faraday remained in the countryside for most of his childhood


Their family may have been happier if they lived in London


Their family may have been happier if they lived in the countryside


Faraday was married to a woman in 1786 who had a father who farmed.


Mr. Hastwell was the father-in-law to Michael Faraday.


Michael was born 5 years after Margaret was married.


The Faradays may have preferred country life to city living.


Michael Faraday was born at Newington, Surrey, on September twenty second.


Michael Faraday was not the oldest of his siblings.


Michael became a blacksmith like his father.


Michael Faraday received the schooling he needed for development in the city.


Michael Faraday's grandparents were from Clapham Wood Hall.


Michael Faraday married Margaret Hastwell.


James Faraday raised at least one child who followed in his footsteps as a blacksmith


Margaret Hastwell had fewer siblings than James Faraday


Michael Faraday and all of his siblings were born in London


James Faraday moved from Newington on September 22, 1791.


James Faraday's father was Michael Faraday.


Michael Faraday was the oldest of his siblings.


The grandparents of Michael Faraday had the same last name.


James Faraday and his family of four kids moved to Newington after Michael was born.


Charles Faraday lived in Michael Well Mews after his ten children were born.


Michael Faraday grew up in the countryside.


James Faraday was only discovered to be a genius in when he was older and humble.


James Faraday was a humble about his blacksmith skill.


Elizabeth Faraday married Margaret Hastwell and became afarmer in Yorkshire.


When the Faraday family left Newington, they had to share a single room for a while at Machester Square.


Michael Faraday's family history is known back at least two generations.


Yorkshire is a less populous locality to be from then Manchester Square


Michael Faraday had a father named Jacob.


In Michael Faraday's day, a family with only four children would be considered small.


People used to live in coach-houses and countrysides.


Newington is not a principality of London.


Both James and Robert Faraday had even numbers of legitimate offspring.


One finds it hard to believe that James and Michael Faraday's family would have been happier if they'd never moved to London.


By definition, a coach-house can only have one room.


Coach-houses in London are reknowned for being upscale.


Had Michael Faraday stayed in the country, it would have been unlikely he would've received the input that made him who he was.


Had James Faraday stayed in the country, it would have been unlikely Michael would've received the input that made him who he was.


Both Micheal and his father were third-born.


Blacksmiths always have three children, no more no less.


Clapham Wood Hall is south-west of Yorkshire.


A couch-house is a kind of country house.


Michael's mother's maiden name was Hastwell.


The Faraday family would have only been a little happier in a country house.


The pendulum had swung---it was no longer the Federalist merchants of New England who were discontent with the policies of the governement, but the planters of the South and particularly of South Carolina. New England was now in favor of a protective tariff. Webster, New England's foremost man at Washington, had voted against the tariff of 1816, but had changed his mind and supported a higher tariff in 1824, and a still higher in 1828. The planters of the South had not found it easy to manufacture goods. They had little or nothing, therefore, to protect against the products of European countries. On the contrary, they exported much to England, and imported from England and other countries many of the things they consumed. Accordingly, they were opposed to the whole system of tariff taxation and desired free trade.

Federalist merchants used to be unhappy with the government's policies


Federalist merchants were unhappy with the government's new policies


The planters of the South manufactured goods


People from the South supported free trade


The South were opposed to a system of free trade


The South imported goods from Washington


The South imported goods from New England


The South was dependent on trade with England


The South wanted to make trade with other countries easier


New England wanted to make trade with other countries easier


New England and South Carolina disagreed about trade


New England and South Carolina agreed about trade


New England and South Carolina did not agree about trade


The planters of the South were protected against the products of European countries


Pendula hang from something and so they can move.


At some point, both planters and merchants were discontented with government policy surrounding tarrifs.


Webster always voted for raising tariffs.


Planters in the south had found manufacturing goods easy.


Had the southern planters succeeded in manufacturing goods, they would have wanted to protect against European importation of products.


Whether a country imposes high tariffs or not, can effect the course of trade.


Planters were opposed to free trade with England.


England manufactured goods that were consumed by Southerners.


England was now in favor of a protective tariff.


All of the goods consumed by Southerners were produced in England.


Free trade was an aspiration of planters from the South because of their economic circumstances.


There were agriculturalists in the South between 1816 and 1828.


Economically, some Southerners had a healthy import-export relattionship with England.


Because of their economic entanglements with Europe, southern planters opposed tariff taxation.


Webster spoke in Washington on behalf of South Californian interests.


Federalist merchants in England were contented with government policies.


European merchants were opposed to Southern planters.


Southern planters had little or nothing.


Southern planters consumed many things from South Carolina.


In his mind, Webster never supported manufacturing goods.


Importing English goods and exporting agricultral products to England was a major thing for the South.


England was a country in the early 1800s.


New England was a country in the early 1800s.


In the past, Federalist merchants had opposed protective tariffs.


Tariffs had to be voted on in the early 1800s in order to be enacted.


Webster had the ability to vote on things.


Webster opposed the whole system of tariff taxation in 1828.


Tariffs are often enacted to protect against foreign products entering the local market.


Everyone was always discontented with government policies.


Southern planters were opposed to at least two goverment policies.


The second listed enemy of Socrates was less powerful than the third one mentioned.


Meletus was impressed by the obedience of his good friend Critias after his interactions with Socrates.


Socrates was well-known for teaching about new gods, to despise goverenmeents, and about many types of orchard fruits.


Alcibiades and Critias used to followthe teachings of the person who was killed in part by Lycon and Anytus.


Socrates preached about new divinities after his death undere the hands of three of his enemies.