Debate: Should High School Last Six Years?
President Obama recently visited a six-year high school, highlighting it as a model for the rest of the U.S. Should it be replicated?

Claim: High school should last six years
Reason: It can provide more vocational training which will better prepare students to handle their future jobs better.
Warrant 0: we really don't that many tradespeople
Warrant 1: we really need more trades people
Correct warrant: 1

Claim: High school should last six years
Reason: Offering 6 years of high school can aid in a better and more well rounded curriculum that will help lift students into well paying jobs.
Warrant 0: those benefits outweigh the drawbacks
Warrant 1: those benefits don't outweigh the drawbacks
Correct warrant: 0

Claim: High school should last six years
Reason: More education leads to more successful people.
Warrant 0: we really need more successful people
Warrant 1: we really don't need more successful people
Correct warrant: 0

Claim: High school should not last six years
Reason: It can provide more vocational training which will better prepare students to handle their future jobs better.
Warrant 0: we really don't that many tradespeople
Warrant 1: we really need more trades people
Correct warrant: 0

Claim: High school should not last six years
Reason: Offering 6 years of high school can aid in a better and more well rounded curriculum that will help lift students into well paying jobs.
Warrant 0: those benefits outweigh the drawbacks
Warrant 1: those benefits don't outweigh the drawbacks
Correct warrant: 1

Claim: High school should not last six years
Reason: More education leads to more successful people.
Warrant 0: we really need more successful people
Warrant 1: we really don't need more successful people
Correct warrant: 1