taltwi/LaCour huggingface dataset:
CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA
Hearing: Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580/12, 36847/12, 11252/13, 12317/13 and 43746/14) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-01-24 00:00:00)
Application no.: 12317/13
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2017-02-02 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD002958012
Respondent state: RUS
Articles of the Convention: 5;5-1;6;6-1;11;11-1;11-2;41
Judges: Alena Poláčková;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Helen Keller;Helena Jäderblom;Luis López Guerra;Pere Pastor Vilanova
Represented by: TEREKHOV K. ; MIKHAYLOVA O.
Issue: Articles 19.3, 27.2 and 27.3 of the Code of the Administrative Offences
Strasbourg case-law cited: Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202/06, § 38, 10 July 2012;Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, § 34, ECHR 2007 III;Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, § 37, Series A no. 202;Fáber v. Hungary, no. 40721/08, § 49, 24 July 2012;Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, 5 January 2016;Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, § 25, Reports 1997 IV;Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013;Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015;Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673/04, 30 May 2013;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998/08, §§ 57-69, 19 November 2015;Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014;Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774/11, § 83, 31 July 2014;;Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07, 57569/11, 80153/12, 5790/13 and 35015/13, 26 April 2016;Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, § 42, ECHR 2006 XIV;Schwabe and M.G. v. Germany, nos. 8080/08 and 8577/08, § 101, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Volkov and Adamskiy v. Russia, nos. 7614/09 and 30863/10, §§ 68 and 71, 26 March 2015
Conclusion: Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Separate opinion: TRUE
NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications
Hearing: Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580/12, 36847/12, 11252/13, 12317/13 and 43746/14) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-01-24 00:00:00)
Application no.: 12317/13
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Respondent state: RUS
Articles of the Convention: 3;5;5-1;5-1-c;6;6-1;6-3-b;6-3-c;6-3-d;10;10-1;10-2;11;11-1;11-2
Represented by: TEREKHOV K. I. ; MIKHAYLOVA O. O.
Conclusion: Communicated
CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA
Hearing: Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580/12, 36847/12, 11252/13, 12317/13 and 43746/14) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-01-24 00:00:00)
Application no.: 43746/14
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2017-02-02 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD002958012
Respondent state: RUS
Articles of the Convention: 5;5-1;6;6-1;11;11-1;11-2;41
Judges: Alena Poláčková;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Helen Keller;Helena Jäderblom;Luis López Guerra;Pere Pastor Vilanova
Represented by: TEREKHOV K. ; MIKHAYLOVA O.
Issue: Articles 19.3, 27.2 and 27.3 of the Code of the Administrative Offences
Strasbourg case-law cited: Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202/06, § 38, 10 July 2012;Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, § 34, ECHR 2007 III;Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, § 37, Series A no. 202;Fáber v. Hungary, no. 40721/08, § 49, 24 July 2012;Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, 5 January 2016;Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, § 25, Reports 1997 IV;Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013;Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015;Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673/04, 30 May 2013;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998/08, §§ 57-69, 19 November 2015;Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014;Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774/11, § 83, 31 July 2014;;Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07, 57569/11, 80153/12, 5790/13 and 35015/13, 26 April 2016;Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, § 42, ECHR 2006 XIV;Schwabe and M.G. v. Germany, nos. 8080/08 and 8577/08, § 101, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Volkov and Adamskiy v. Russia, nos. 7614/09 and 30863/10, §§ 68 and 71, 26 March 2015
Conclusion: Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Separate opinion: TRUE
NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications
Hearing: Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580/12, 36847/12, 11252/13, 12317/13 and 43746/14) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-01-24 00:00:00)
Application no.: 43746/14
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Respondent state: RUS
Articles of the Convention: 3;5;5-1;5-1-c;6;6-1;6-3-b;6-3-c;6-3-d;10;10-1;10-2;11;11-1;11-2
Represented by: TEREKHOV K. I. ; MIKHAYLOVA O. O.
Conclusion: Communicated
CASE OF MOLLA SALI v. GREECE
Hearing: Molla Sali v. Greece (no. 20452/14) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2017-12-06 00:00:00)
Application no.: 20452/14
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2020-06-18 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0618JUD002045214
Respondent state: GRC
Articles of the Convention: 41
Judges: Alena Poláčková;Aleš Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Egidijus Kūris;Ganna Yudkivska;Julia Laffranque;Kristina Pardalos;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mārtiņš Mits;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;Tim Eicke
Represented by: KTISTAKIS Y. ; TSITSELIKIS K. 
Strasbourg case-law cited: Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain (Article 50), 13 July 1994, § 17, Series A no. 285-C;Brumărescu v. Romania (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 28342/95, § 20, ECHR 2001 I;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 13216/05, § 59, ECHR 2017;Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000 IV;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 25781/94, § 56, ECHR 2014;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium (Article 50), 10 March 1972, § 16, Series A no. 14;Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC] (just satisfaction), no. 25701/94, § 79, 28 November 2002;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858/00, § 90, 22 December 2009;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828/06, § 79, ECHR 2014;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (Article 50), 31 October 1995, § 38, Series A no. 330-B;S.C. Granitul S.A. v. Romania (just satisfaction), no. 22022/03, § 15, 24 April 2012;Kryvenkyy v. Ukraine, no. 43768/07, § 52, 16 February 2017;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 40167/06, § 39, 12 December 2017;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90 and 8 others, § 224, ECHR 2009;Vistiņš and Perepjolkins v. Latvia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 71243/01, ECHR 2014
Conclusion: Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Separate opinion: TRUE
CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
Hearing: Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2017-11-29 00:00:00)
Application no.: 10211/12
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2017-02-02 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD001021112
Respondent state: DEU
Articles of the Convention: 5;5-1;5-4;6;6-1;7;7-1
Judges: Angelika Nußberger;Erik Møse;Ganna Yudkivska;Mārtiņš Mits;Síofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev
Represented by: TEGEBAUER I.-J.
Conclusion: No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal)
Separate opinion: FALSE
CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
Hearing: Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2017-11-29 00:00:00)
Application no.: 27505/14
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2017-02-02 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD001021112
Respondent state: DEU
Articles of the Convention: 5;5-1;5-4;6;6-1;7;7-1
Judges: Angelika Nußberger;Erik Møse;Ganna Yudkivska;Mārtiņš Mits;Síofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev
Represented by: TEGEBAUER I.-J.
Conclusion: No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal)
Separate opinion: FALSE
ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
Hearing: Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2017-11-29 00:00:00)
Application no.: 27505/14
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Respondent state: DEU
Articles of the Convention: 5;5-1-e;6;6-1;7;7-1
Represented by: TEGEBAUER I. J.
Conclusion: Communicated
NICOLAE VIRGILIU TĂNASE v. ROMANIA
Hearing: Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase v. Romania (no. 41720/13) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2017-11-15 00:00:00)
Application no.: 41720/13
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Respondent state: ROU
Articles of the Convention: 3
Represented by: TANASE D. I.
Conclusion: Communicated
BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM AND ALICE ROSS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Hearing: Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960/15) (Chamber hearing, 2017-11-07 00:00:00)
Application no.: 62322/14
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Respondent state: GBR
Articles of the Convention: 8;8-1;10;10-1
Represented by: LEIGH DAY & CO
Conclusion: Communicated
10 HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Hearing: Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960/15) (Chamber hearing, 2017-11-07 00:00:00)
Application no.: 24960/15
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Respondent state: GBR
Articles of the Convention: 6;6-1;8;8-1;10;10-2;14
Represented by: WELSH J. ; WILLIAMS N. ; SCOTT M. 
Conclusion: Communicated
CASE OF ZUBAC v. CROATIA
Hearing: Zubac v. Croatia (no. 40160/12) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2017-07-12 00:00:00)
Application no.: 40160/12
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2016-10-11 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011JUD004016012
Respondent state: HRV
Articles of the Convention: 6;6-1
Judges: Jon Fridrik Kjølbro;Julia Laffranque;Paul Lemmens;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turković
Represented by: BAN I.
Conclusion: Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)
Separate opinion: TRUE
ZUBAC v. CROATIA
Hearing: Zubac v. Croatia (no. 40160/12) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2017-07-12 00:00:00)
Application no.: 40160/12
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Respondent state: HRV
Articles of the Convention: 6;6-1
Represented by: BAN I.
Conclusion: Communicated
CASE OF NAIT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND
Hearing: Naït-Liman v. Switzerland (no. 51357/07) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2017-06-14 00:00:00)
Application no.: 51357/07
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2016-06-21 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005135707
Respondent state: CHE
Articles of the Convention: 6;6-1
Judges: Egidijus Kūris;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kjølbro;Nebojša Vučinić;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano
Represented by: MEMBREZ F.
Strasbourg case-law cited: Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no 35763/97, ECHR 2001 XI;Anheuser-Busch Inv. v. Portugal [GC], no 73049/01, §§ 85-86, ECHR 2007 I;Arlewin v. Sweden, no 22302/10, §§ 72 et seq., 1 March 2016;Běleš and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 47273/99, § 49, ECHR 2002 IX;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no 15869/02, § 57, ECHR 2010;Eşim v. Turkey, no 59601/09, § 18, 17 September 2013;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no 18;Howald Moor and Others v. Switzerland, nos. 52067/10 and 41072/11, 11 March 2014;Jones and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 34356/06 and 40525/06, 14 January 2014;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, § 59, Reports 1998 II;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, § 29, Series A no 176 A;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593/08, ECHR 2012;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615/07, § 131, ECHR 2010;Nusret Kaya and Others v. Turkey, nos. 43750/06, 43752/06, 32054/08, 37753/08 and 60915/08, § 38, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Stagno v. Belgium, no 1062/07, § 25, 7 July 2009;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, § 230, ECHR 2012;Stubbings and Others v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1996, § 50, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Yabansu and Others v. Turkey, no 43903/09, § 58, 12 November 2013
Conclusion: No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)
Separate opinion: TRUE
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
Hearing: Sharxhi and Others v. Albania (no. 10613/16) (Chamber hearing, 2017-05-23 00:00:00)
Application no.: 10613/16
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Respondent state: ALB
Articles of the Convention: 6;6-1;8;8-1;13;14;P1-1
Conclusion: Communicated
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
Hearing: Merabishvili v. Georgia (no. 72508/13) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2017-03-08 00:00:00)
Application no.: 72508/13
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2016-06-14 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614JUD007250813
Respondent state: GEO
Articles of the Convention: 5;5-1;5-1-c;5-3;18;18+5-1;41
Judges: András Sajó;Egidijus Kūris;Iulia Motoc;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano
Represented by: LEACH Ph. ; KAKHIDZE O.
Issue: Articles 194 §§ 1, 2205 § 2 and 206 §§ 1, 8 and 9 of the CPP 
Strasbourg case-law cited: Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 206, ECHR 2004-II;Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, § 56, ECHR 2000 III;Cebotari v. Moldova, no. 35615/06, § 49, 13 November 2007;Chitayev v. Russia, no. 59334/00, 18 January 2007;G.K. v. Poland, no. 38816/97, § 84, 20 January 2004;Galuashvili v. Georgia, no. 40008/04, § 33-34, 17 July 2008;Ghavtadze v. Georgia, no. 23204/07, §§ 118 and 120, 3 March 2009;Gigolashvili v. Georgia, no. 18145/05, §§ 32-36, 8 July 2008;Giorgi Nikolaishvili v. Georgia, no. 37048/04, 13 January 2009;Gusinskiy v. Russia, no. 70276/01, § 75, ECHR 2004 IV;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 15172/13, §§ 142-143, 22 May 2014;Ječius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, §§ 57-64, ECHR 2000 IX;Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, § 75, 10 February 2011;Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, § 257, 31 May 2011;Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 125, ECHR 2005 X (extracts);Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 153, ECHR 2000 IV;Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 6492/11, §§ 108-109, 3 July 2012;Mikiashvili v. Georgia, no. 18996/06, §§ 101-102, 9 October 2012;Nikolov v. Bulgaria, no. 38884/97, § 73, 30 January 2003;Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, § 107, 8 February 2005;Patsuria v. Georgia, no. 30779/04, § 74, 6 November 2007;Ramishvili and Kokhreidze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 1704/06, 27 June 2007;Saghinadze and Others v. Georgia, no. 18768/05, §§ 136-140, 27 May 2010;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 63, ECHR 2003‑IX (extracts);Stašaitis v. Lithuania, no. 47679/99, § 82, 21 March 2002;Tymoshenko v. Ukraine, no. 49872/11, § 267, 30 April 2013
Conclusion: No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 18+5-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Separate opinion: FALSE
CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS
Hearing: Garib v. the Netherlands (no. 43494/09) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2017-01-25 00:00:00)
Application no.: 43494/09
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2016-02-23 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223JUD004349409
Respondent state: NLD
Articles of the Convention: 8;P1-1;P4-2;P4-2-1;P4-2-3
Judges: Branko Lubarda;George Nicolaou;Helen Keller;Helena Jäderblom;Johannes Silvis;Luis López Guerra;Pere Pastor Vilanova
Represented by: WIJLING R.S.
Issue: Inner City Problems (Special Measures) Act ; 2003 Housing Bye-law of the municipality of Rotterdam (2006 version)

Strasbourg case-law cited: Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Ayangil and Others v. Turkey, no. 33294/03, § 50, 6 December 2011;Blečić v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 67, ECHR 2006 III;Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 33, ECHR 2008;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 101, ECHR 2014;Codona v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 485/05, 7 February 2006;Connors v. the United Kingdom, no. 66746/01, §§ 82-83, 27 May 2004;Guincho v. Portugal, 10 July 1984, § 39, Series A no. 81;Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC], no. 35014/97, § 166, ECHR 2006 VIII;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 51, Series A no. 98;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, § 70, Series A no. 310;Maurice v. France [GC], no. 11810/03, § 117, ECHR 2005‑IX;McCann v. the United Kingdom, no. 19009/04, § 49, ECHR 2008;Mellacher and Others v. Austria, 19 December 1989, § 53, Series A no. 169;Noack and Others v. Germany (dec.), ECHR 2000-VI;O’Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810/09, § 115, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470/11, § 170, 27 August 2015;Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, § 48, 24 October 2002;S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 129, ECHR 2014 (extracts);S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813/00, ECHR 2011;Salah v. the Netherlands, no. 8196/02, § 69, ECHR 2006 IX (extracts);Shefer v. Russia (dec.), no. 45175/04, 13 March 2012;Van Anraat v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65389/09, § 75, 6 July 2010;Ward v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) no. 31888/03, 9 November 2004;Winterstein and Others v. France, no. 27013/07, § 159, 17 October 2013;Ždanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278/00, §§ 112-115, ECHR 2006‑IV;Zehentner v. Austria, no. 20082/02, §§ 57-58, 16 July 2009
Conclusion: No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom to choose residence)
Separate opinion: TRUE
CASE OF BĂRBULESCU v. ROMANIA
Hearing: Bărbulescu v. Romania (no. 61496/08) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2016-11-30 00:00:00)
Application no.: 61496/08
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2016-01-12 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD006149608
Respondent state: ROU
Articles of the Convention: 8;8-1;35
Judges: András Sajó;Egidijus Kūris;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano
Represented by: COSTINESCU D. ; JUVERDEANU O.
Strasbourg case-law cited: Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 43, ECHR 2000 II;Benediksdóttir v. Iceland (dec.), no. 38079/06, 16 June 2009;Bohlen v. Germany, no. 53495/09, § 45, 19 February 2015;Botta v. Italy, 24 February 1998, § 35, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Copland v. the United Kingdom, no. 62617/00, § 41, ECHR 2007 I;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, § 43, 22 January 2008;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, §§ 75 and 77, ECHR 2007 I;Fernández Martínez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030/07, § 126, ECHR 2014 (extracts);García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, §§ 28-29, ECHR 1999 I;Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, §§ 44-45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738/10, § 106, 3 October 2014;Köpke v. Germany (dec.), no. 420/07, 5 October 2010;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251 B;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722/11, ECHR 2013;Pay v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 32792/05, 16 September 2008;Peev v. Bulgaria, no. 64209/01, 26 July 2007;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 57, ECHR 2012;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, §§ 59 and 63, ECHR 2007 IV;Yuditskaya and Others v. Russia, no. 5678/06, § 30, 12 February 2015
Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life)
Separate opinion: TRUE
BARBULESCU v. ROMANIA
Hearing: Bărbulescu v. Romania (no. 61496/08) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2016-11-30 00:00:00)
Application no.: 61496/08
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Document date: 2012-12-18 00:00:00
Respondent state: ROU
Articles of the Convention: 8;8-1
Represented by: N/A
Conclusion: Communicated
Separate opinion: FALSE
CASE OF FÁBIÁN v. HUNGARY
Hearing: Fábián v. Hungary (no. 78117/13) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2016-11-09 00:00:00)
Application no.: 78117/13
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2015-12-15 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1215JUD007811713
Respondent state: HUN
Articles of the Convention: 14;14+P1-1-1;41;P1-1;P1-1-1
Judges: András Sajó;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano
Represented by: GRAD A.
Strasbourg case-law cited: Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, § 70, ECHR 2010;Gaygusuz v. Austria, 16 September 1996, §§ 41-42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany, § 22, 18 July 1994, Series A no. 291-B
Conclusion: Violation of Article 14+P1-1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Possessions;Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Separate opinion: FALSE
FÁBIÁN v. HUNGARY
Hearing: Fábián v. Hungary (no. 78117/13) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2016-11-09 00:00:00)
Application no.: 78117/13
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Respondent state: HUN
Articles of the Convention: 14;P1-1
Represented by: GRAD A.
Conclusion: Communicated