CASE OF MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (No. 2)
Hearing: Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (No. 2) (no. 19867/12)  (Grand Chamber hearing, 2016-06-01 00:00:00)
Application no.: 19867/12
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2017-07-11 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0711JUD001986712
Respondent state: PRT
Articles of the Convention: 6;6-1;35;35-3-a;46;46-1;46-2
Judges: András Sajó;Angelika Nußberger;Egidijus Kūris;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kjølbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis López Guerra;Marko Bošnjak;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Mahoney;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Síofra O'Leary;Vincent A. De Gaetano
Represented by: ALVES J.J.F.
Issue: Articles 449 (1) (g) and 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Strasbourg case-law cited: Anđelković v. Serbia, no. 1401/08, § 24, 9 April 2013;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, §§ 202 and 203, ECHR 2004 II;Bochan v. Ukraine (no 2) [GC], no 22251/08, ECHR 2015;Bota v. Romania, no. 16382/03, §§ 33 and 34, 4 November 2008;Bujniţa v. Moldova, no. 36492/02, § 20, 16 January 2007;Davydov v. Russia, no. 18967/07, § 29, 30 October 2014;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, §§ 138 and 139, ECHR 2013;Dulaurans v. France, no. 34553/97, §§ 33-34 and 38, 21 March 2000;Egmez v. Cyprus, (dec.), no. 12214/07, 18 September 2012;Emre v. Switzerland (no. 2), no. 5056/10, 11 October 2011;Fischer v. Austria (dec.), no. 27569/02, ECHR 2003-VI;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 26, ECHR 1999 I;Giuran v. Romania, no. 24360/04, § 39, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland, no. 23614/08, § 66, 30 November 2010;Higgins and Others v. France, 19 February 1998, §§ 42-43, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Jeronovičs v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898/10, § 118, ECHR 2016;Khamidov v. Russia, no. 72118/01, § 170, 15 November 2007;Lenskaya v. Russia, no. 28730/03, §§ 39 and 40, 29 January 2009;Lhermitte v. Belgium [GC], no. 34238/09, §§ 66 and 67, ECHR 2016;Lyons and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 15227/03, ECHR 2003-IX;Maresti v. Croatia, no. 55759/07, §§ 25 and 28, 25 June 2009;Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, § 40, ECHR 2002 VII;Monnell and Morris v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 54, Series A no. 115;Nikitin v. Russia, no. 50178/99, §§ 55-57, ECHR 2004 VIII;Öcalan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 5980/07, 6 July 2010;Öcalan v. Turkey, [GC], no. 46221/99, § 210, ECHR 2005 IV;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, § 210, ECHR 2017;Pavlović and Others v. Croatia, no. 13274/11, § 49, 2 April 2015;Radchikov v. Russia, no. 65582/01, § 48, 24 May 2007;Ruiz Torija v. Spain, 9 December 1994, §§ 29-30, Series A no. 303 A;Savinskiy v. Ukraine, no. 6965/02, § 25, 28 February 2006;Sejdovic v. Italy, [GC], no. 56581/00, ECHR 2006 II;Ştefan v. Romania, no. 28319/03, § 18, 6 April 2010;Tsanova-Gecheva v. Bulgaria, no. 43800/12, § 91, 15 September 2015;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) ([GC], no 32772/02, ECHR 2009;Yaremenko v. Ukraine (no. 2), no. 66338/09, 30 April 2015
External sources: Recommendation No. (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Conclusion: Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Criminal charge;Fair hearing)
Separate opinion: TRUE