CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA
Hearing: Murtazaliyeva v. Russia (no. 36658/05) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2018-02-14 00:00:00)
Application no.: 36658/05
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2018-12-18 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218JUD003665805
Respondent state: RUS
Articles of the Convention: 6;6+6-3-b;6+6-3-d;6-1;6-3-b;6-3-d;35;35-3-a
Judges: Alena Poláčková;André Potocki;Angelika Nußberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Dmitry Dedov;Erik Møse;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena Jäderblom;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis López Guerra;Marko Bošnjak;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Georges Ravarani;Tim Eicke
Represented by: KOROTEYEV K.N.
Issue: Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure &quot;CCrP&quot;
Strasbourg case-law cited: Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809/08, § 78, 21 June 2016;Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011;Andrey Zakharov v. Ukraine, no. 26581/06, §§ 61-62, 7 January 2016;Asci v. Austria (dec.), no. 4483/02, 19 October 2006;Bocos-Cuesta v. the Netherlands, no. 54789/00, § 66, 10 November 2005;Boldea v. Romania, no. 19997/02, § 30, 15 February 2007;Bricmont v. Belgium, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158;C.G.P. v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 29835/96, 15 January 1997;Destrehem v. France, no. 56651/00, §§ 41-45, 18 May 2004;Dorokhov v. Russia, no. 66802/01, §§ 67-72, 14 February 2008;Dvorski v. Croatia [GC], no. 25703/11, ECHR 2015;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 91, Series A no. 22;Gabrielyan v. Armenia, no. 8088/05, § 85, 10 April 2012;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 162, ECHR 2010;Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986/03, § 84, 15 November 2007;Giurgiu v. Romania (dec.), no. 26239/09, § 99, 3 October 2017;Guilloury v. France, no. 62236/00, § 55, 22 June 2006;Hermi v. Italy [GC], no. 18114/02, § 79, ECHR 2006 XII;Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541/08 and 3 others, §§ 250-52, 13 September 2016;Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 69234/11 and 2 others, § 95, 11 February 2016;Janyr v. the Czech Republic, no. 42937/08, §§ 81-82, 31 October 2013;Khametshin v. Russia, no. 18487/03, § 41, 4 March 2010;Lagutin and Others v. Russia, nos. 6228/09 and 4 others, § 118, 24 April 2014;Lüdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, § 43, Series A no. 238;Makeyev v. Russia, no. 13769/04, § 37, 5 February 2009;Miminoshvili v. Russia, no. 20197/03, § 122, 28 June 2011;Nikolitsas v. Greece, no. 63117/09, § 30, 3 July 2014;Palchik v. Ukraine, no. 16980/06, §§ 36-38, 2 March 2017;Pello v. Estonia, no. 11423/03, §§ 33-34, 12 April 2007;Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 54-56, ECHR 2004 I;Perna v. Italy ([GC], no. 48898/99, §§ 29-32, ECHR 2003 V;Poletan and Azirovik v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26711/07 and 2 others, § 87, 12 May 2016;Polufakin and Chernyshev v. Russia, no. 30997/02, § 207, 25 September 2008;Polyakov v. Russia, no. 77018/01, §§ 34-35, 29 January 2009;Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 188, 13 July 2006;Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 35289/11, § 97, 19 September 2017;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272/03, §§ 91-92, 2 November 2010;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC] no. 9154/10, § 101, ECHR 2015;Sergey Afanasyev v. Ukraine, no. 48057/06, § 70, 15 November 2012;Shumeyev and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 29474/07 and 3 others, 22 September 2015;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980/04, § 113, 12 May 2017;Stanford v. the United Kingdom, 23 February 1994, § 26, Series A no. 282 A;Tarasov v. Ukraine, no. 17416/03, § 105, 31 October 2013;Tarău v. Romania, no. 3584/02, §§ 74-76, 24 February 2009;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, § 84, ECHR 2010;Topić v. Croatia, no. 51355/10, § 42, 10 October 2013;Tseber v. the Czech Republic, no. 46203/08, § 42, 22 November 2012;Tymchenko v. Ukraine, no. 47351/06, § 92, 13 October 2016;Vacher v. France, 17 December 1996, § 22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, 19 April 1994, § 61, Series A no. 288;Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, 23 April 1997, § 50, Reports 1997 III;;Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 33, Series A no. 235 B;Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, § 56, 25 March 2014;Zahirović v. Croatia, no. 58590/11, § 42, 25 April 2013
Conclusion: Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-b - Adequate facilities);No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Obtain attendance of witnesses)
Separate opinion: TRUE