CASE OF MUSTAFA TUNÇ AND FECİRE TUNÇ v. TURKEY
Hearing: Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey (no. 24014/05) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2014-04-16 00:00:00)
Application no.: 24014/05
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2015-04-14 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0414JUD002401405
Respondent state: TUR
Articles of the Convention: 2;2-1;34
Judges: András Sajó;Angelika Nußberger;Dean Spielmann;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena Jäderblom;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Luis López Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nebojša Vučinić;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Peer Lorenzen;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva
Represented by: MULLER M. ; BUTLER M. ; VINE C. ; YILDIZ K. ; KARAKAS S.
Strasbourg case-law cited: Aktaş v. Turkey, no.  24351/94, § 301, ECHR 2003 V;Alp v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3757/09, §§ 27-33, 9 July 2013;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, ECHR 2011;Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 138, ECHR 2002 IV;Anık and Others v. Turkey, no. 63758/00, §§ 76-77, 5 June 2007;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944/06, 8300/07, 50184/07, 332/08 and 42509/10, § 235, 18 December 2012;Ataykaya v. Turkey, no. 50275/08, § 47, 22 July 2014;Aydan v. Turkey, no. 16281/10, § 69, 12 March 2013;Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania, no. 46430/99, 5 October 2004;Bektaş and Özalp v. Turkey, no. 10036/03, § 66, 20 April 2010;Blečić v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, §§ 66 et seq., ECHR 2006 III;Bursuc v. Romania, no. 42066/98, §§ 107-109, 12 October 2004;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, §§ 51 et seq., ECHR 2002 I;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 147, 17 July 2014;Dobriyeva and Others v  Russia, no. 18407/10, § 72, 19 December 2013;Dumitru Popescu v. Romania (no. 1), no. 49234/99, §§ 75 et seq., 26 April 2007;Đurđević v. Croatia, no. 52442/09, §§ 89-91, ECHR 2011;Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no 247-B;Emars v. Latvia, no. 22412/08, §§ 85 and 95, 18 November 2014;Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, §§  247 et seq., 26 April 2011;Erkan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 41792/10, §§ 54-62, 28 January 2014;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, ECHR 2011;Grimailovs v. Latvia, no. 6087/03, § 114, 25 June 2013;Güleç v. Turkey, 27 July 1998, Reports 1998 IV;Gürtekin and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), nos. 60441/13, 68206/13 and 68667/13, 11 March 2014;Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, § 109, ECHR 2001 III;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708/08, § 186, ECHR 2014;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, § 89, Reports 1998 I;Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, § 105, 4 May 2001;Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108/02, § 201, 5 November 2009;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, §§ 258 et seq., ECHR 2012 (extracts);Leyla Alp and Others v. Turkey, no. 29675/02, § 76, 10 December 2013;Mantog v. Romania, no. 2893/02, §§ 70 et seq., 11 October 2007;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, § 90, ECHR 2002 VIII;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 161-163, Series A no. 324;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 129, ECHR 2001 III;Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 160, ECHR 2005 VII;Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888/03, § 55, 20 December 2007;Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 22, ECHR 2003 III;Oğur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, §§ 90-91, ECHR 1999 III;Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 342, 18 June 2002;Pankov v. Bulgaria, no. 12773/03, § 54, 7 October 2010;Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255/00, § 56, 9 May 2006;Perevedentsevy v. Russia, no. 39583/05, § 107, 24 April 2014;Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 67, ECHR 2004-I;Putintseva v. Russia, no. 33498/04, § 52, 10 May 2012;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 359, ECHR 2007 II;Rupa v. Romania (no. 1), no. 58478/00, §§123 and 124, 16 December 2008;Saçılık and Others v. Turkey, nos. 43044/05 and 45001/05, § 98, 5 July 2011;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 83, ECHR 2000-VII;Şandru and Others v. Romania, no. 22465/03, § 74, 8 December 2009;Sergey Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 32478/02, 4 April 2006;Stefan v. Romania (dec.), no. 5650/04, § 48, 29 November 2011;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 79, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Tanrıbilir v. Turkey, no. 21422/93, §§ 54 85, 16 November 2000;Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, ECHR 1999 IV;Tikhonova v. Russia, no. 13596/05, § 82, 30 April 2014;Trufin v. Romania, no. 3990/04, § 52, 20 October 2009;Velcea and Mazăre v. Romania, no. 64301/01, §§ 113-114, 1 December 2009;Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 80, ECHR 2000 VI;Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004 VIII;Yotova v. Bulgaria, no. 43606/04, § 68, 23 October 2012
Conclusion: Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)
Separate opinion: TRUE