taltwi/LaCour huggingface dataset:
CASE OF OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. UKRAINE
Hearing: Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine (no. 21722/11) (Chamber hearing, 2012-06-12 00:00:00)
Application no.: 21722/11
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2018-02-06 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0206JUD002172211
Respondent state: UKR
Articles of the Convention: 37;37-1-b
Judges: Carlo Ranzoni;Ganna Yudkivska;Marko Bošnjak;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Georges Ravarani
Represented by: LEACH Ph.
Conclusion: Struck out of the list (Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved)
Separate opinion: FALSE
VOLKOV v. UKRAINE
Hearing: Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine (no. 21722/11) (Chamber hearing, 2012-06-12 00:00:00)
Application no.: 21722/11
Document type: DECISIONS
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018DEC002172211
Respondent state: UKR
Articles of the Convention: 6;8;13
Judges: Angelika Nußberger;Dean Spielmann;Ganna Yudkivska;Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger
Represented by: N/A
Conclusion: Partly inadmissible
EL-MASRI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
Hearing: El-Masri v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (no. 39630/09) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2012-05-16 00:00:00)
Application no.: 39630/09
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Document date: 2010-09-28 00:00:00
Respondent state: MKD
Articles of the Convention: 3;5;5-1;8;8-1;10;13
Represented by: SKILBECK RUPERTGOLDSTON, J ; GOLDSTON, J ; GOLDSTON, J
Conclusion: Communicated
Separate opinion: FALSE
CASE OF FABRIS v. FRANCE
Hearing: Fabris v. France (no. 16574/08) Article 41 - Just satisfaction (Grand Chamber hearing, 2012-04-04 00:00:00)
Application no.: 16574/08
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2013-06-28 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0628JUD001657408
Respondent state: FRA
Articles of the Convention: 37;37-1-b;39
Judges: Alvina Gyulumyan;András Sajó;André Potocki;Egbert Myjer;Elisabeth Steiner;Françoise Tulkens;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Josep Casadevall;Karel Jungwiert;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque
Represented by: OTTAN A.
Conclusion: Struck out of the list (Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved)
Separate opinion: TRUE
CASE OF FABRIS v. FRANCE
Hearing: Fabris v. France (no. 16574/08) Article 41 - Just satisfaction (Grand Chamber hearing, 2012-04-04 00:00:00)
Application no.: 16574/08
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2011-07-21 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0721JUD001657408
Respondent state: FRA
Articles of the Convention: 14;14+P1-1;P1-1;P1-1-1
Judges: Angelika Nußberger;Dean Spielmann;Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre;Jean-Paul Costa;Mark Villiger
Represented by: OTTAN A.
Issue: Articles 745, 757, 760 and 1075 -1077 of the Civil code ; Article 15 of Law no.2001-1135 of 3 December 2001 &quot;on the rights of the surviving spouse and children born of adultery and modernising various provisions of the law of succession&quot;
Strasbourg case-law cited: Alboize-Barthes and Alboize-Montezume v. France (dec.), no 44421/04, 21 October 2008;Blecic v. Croatia ([GC], no 59532/00, ECHR 2006-III;Brauer v. Germany, no 3545/04, 28 May 2009;De Diego Nafría v. Spain, no 46833/99, § 39, 14 March 2002;E.S. v. France (dec.), 10 February 2009, no 49714/06;Inze v. Austria, 28 October 1987, Series A no 126;Kopecký v. Slovakia (no 44912/98 [CG], § 38, ECHR 2004-IX);Larkos v. Cyprus [GC], no 29515/95, §§ 30-31, ECHR 1999-I;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, Series A no 31;Mazurek v. France, no 34406/97, ECHR 2000-II;Merger and Cros v. France, no 68864/01, 22 December 2004;Ostojic v. Croatia (dec.), no 16837/02, ECHR 2002-IX;Pla and Puncernau v. Andorra, no 69498/01, ECHR 2004-VIII;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, ECHR 2005-X
Conclusion: No violation of Art. 14+P1-1
Separate opinion: TRUE
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
Hearing: De Souza Ribeiro v. France  (no. 22689/07) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2012-03-21 00:00:00)
Application no.: 22689/07
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2012-12-13 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD002268907
Respondent state: FRA
Articles of the Convention: 8;8-1;8-2;13;13+8;34;41
Judges: Alvina Gyulumyan;André Potocki;Angelika Nußberger;Corneliu Bîrsan;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Elisabet Fura;Erik Møse;Françoise Tulkens;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre;Jean-Paul Costa;Karel Jungwiert;Lech Garlicki;Mark Villiger;Nebojša Vučinić;Nicolas Bratza;Päivi Hirvelä;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Zdravka Kalaydjieva
Represented by: MONGET SARRAIL D.
Issue: Article L. 511-4 (2) of the Code regulating the entry and residence of aliens and asylum-seekers
Strasbourg case-law cited: Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no 50963/99, § 133, 20 June 2002;Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 136, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts);Boultif v. Switzerland, no 54273/00, § 46, ECHR 2001-IX;Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII;Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no 23657/94, § 112, ECHR 1999-IV;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, §§ 152 à 154, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V;Chamaïev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no 36378/02, § 448, ECHR 2005-III;Conka v. Belgium, no 51564/99, ECHR 2002-I;Doran v. Ireland, no 50389/99, § 57, ECHR 2003-X;G.H.H. and Others v. Turkey, no 43258/98, § 36, ECHR 2000-VIII;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no 25389/05, ECHR 2007-II;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765/09, 23 February 2012;I.M. v. France, no 9152/09, 2 February 2012;Jabari v. Turkey, no 40035/98, ECHR 2000-VIII;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no 25702/94, §§ 140-141, ECHR 2001-VII;Khan v. Royaume-uni, no 35394/97, §§ 44 à 47, ECHR 2000-V;Kudla v. Poland [GC], no 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, §§ 77 and 81 à 83, Series A no 116;M. and Others v. Bulgaria, no 41416/08, §§ 122 à 132, 26 July 2011;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, §§ 286-287, ECHR 2011;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no 28341/95, § 69, ECHR 2000-V;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no 926/05, § 61, ECHR 2010;Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, § 122, Series A no 215
Conclusion: Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8-2 - Interference;Prescribed by law;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Expulsion) (Brazil);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award
Separate opinion: TRUE
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
Hearing: De Souza Ribeiro v. France  (no. 22689/07) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2012-03-21 00:00:00)
Application no.: 22689/07
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2011-06-30 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0630JUD002268907
Respondent state: FRA
Articles of the Convention: 8;8-1;13;13+8;34
Judges: Dean Spielmann;Elisabet Fura;Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre;Jean-Paul Costa;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger
Represented by: MONGET SARRAIL D.
Issue: Articles 511-4, L.514-1 and 2 of the Code regulating the entry and residence of aliens and asylum-seekers
Strasbourg case-law cited: Boyle and Rice c. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no 131;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 145, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V;Conka v. Belgium, no 51564/99, ECHR 2002-I;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France (dec.), no 25389/05, § 36, 10 October 2006;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no 25389/05, § 56, ECHR 2007-V;Jabari v. Turkey, no 40035/98, § 50, ECHR 2000-VIII;Kaftailova v. Latvia, no 59653/00, 21 October 2004;Mikheyeva c. Latvia (dec.), no 50029/99, 12 September 2002;Rotaru c. Romania [GC], no 28341/95, § 67, ECHR 2000-V
Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Art. 13+8
Separate opinion: TRUE
ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Hearing: Animal Defenders International c. United Kingdom (no. 48876/08) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2012-03-07 00:00:00)
Application no.: 48876/08
Document type: COMMUNICATEDCASES
Document date: 2011-01-18 00:00:00
Respondent state: GBR
Articles of the Convention: 10
Represented by: BINDMANS LLP
Conclusion: Communicated
Separate opinion: FALSE
CATAN AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
Hearing: Catan and Others v. Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 43370/04, 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2012-01-25 00:00:00)
Application no.: 43370/04
Document type: DECISIONS
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC004337004
Respondent state: MDA;RUS
Articles of the Convention: 3;8;14+8;14;P1-2
Judges: Anatoly Kovler;David Thór Björgvinsson;Ján Šikuta;Lech Garlicki;Mihai Poalelungi;Nicolas Bratza
Represented by: MANOLE I., lawyer, Chisinau ; POSTICA, A , lawyer, Chisinau ;  UNGER, A., Professor of law, London South Bank University
Conclusion: Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
CATAN AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
Hearing: Catan and Others v. Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 43370/04, 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2012-01-25 00:00:00)
Application no.: 8252/05
Document type: DECISIONS
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC004337004
Respondent state: MDA;RUS
Articles of the Convention: 3;8;14+8;14;P1-2
Judges: Anatoly Kovler;David Thór Björgvinsson;Ján Šikuta;Lech Garlicki;Mihai Poalelungi;Nicolas Bratza
Represented by: MANOLE I., lawyer, Chisinau ; POSTICA, A , lawyer, Chisinau ;  UNGER, A., Professor of law, London South Bank University
Conclusion: Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
CATAN AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
Hearing: Catan and Others v. Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 43370/04, 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2012-01-25 00:00:00)
Application no.: 18454/06
Document type: DECISIONS
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC004337004
Respondent state: MDA;RUS
Articles of the Convention: 3;8;14+8;14;P1-2
Judges: Anatoly Kovler;David Thór Björgvinsson;Ján Šikuta;Lech Garlicki;Mihai Poalelungi;Nicolas Bratza
Represented by: MANOLE I., lawyer, Chisinau ; POSTICA, A , lawyer, Chisinau ;  UNGER, A., Professor of law, London South Bank University
Conclusion: Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
CASE OF VISTIŅŠ AND PEREPJOLKINS v. LATVIA
Hearing: Vistiŋš and Perepjolkins v. Latvia (no. 71243/01) Article 41 - Just satisfaction (Grand Chamber hearing, 2012-01-11 00:00:00)
Application no.: 71243/01
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2014-03-25 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD007124301
Respondent state: LVA
Articles of the Convention: 41
Judges: András Sajó;André Potocki;Angelika Nußberger;Dean Spielmann;Elisabeth Steiner;Françoise Tulkens;Ján Šikuta;Julia Laffranque;Karel Jungwiert;Kristina Pardalos;Lech Garlicki;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Nicolas Bratza;Nona Tsotsoria;Peer Lorenzen
Represented by: RADZINS E.
Issue: Articles 1757, 1765 and 1763 of the Civil Code
Strasbourg case-law cited: Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, § 115, ECHR 2009;Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC] (just satisfaction), no. 25701/94, §§ 78-79, 28 November 2002;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858/00, 22 December 2009;Iatridis v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 31107/96, § 32, ECHR 2000 XI;Medici and Others v. Italy (just satisfaction), no. 70508/01, § 13, 4 December 2012;Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 258, ECHR 2006 V
Conclusion: Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage)
Separate opinion: TRUE
CASE OF VISTIŅŠ AND PEREPJOLKINS v. LATVIA
Hearing: Vistiŋš and Perepjolkins v. Latvia (no. 71243/01) Article 41 - Just satisfaction (Grand Chamber hearing, 2012-01-11 00:00:00)
Application no.: 71243/01
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2011-03-08 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0308JUD007124301
Respondent state: LVA
Articles of the Convention: 14;14+P1-1;P1-1;P1-1-1
Judges: Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu Bîrsan;Egbert Myjer;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Lech Garlicki;Luis López Guerra
Represented by: RADZINS E.
Strasbourg case-law cited: Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no 33202/96, § 112, ECHR 2000-I;Bistrovic v. Croatia, no 25774/05, § 35, 31 May 2007;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no 31443/96, § 182, ECHR 2004-V;Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, § 75, ECHR 1999-III;Efstathiou and Michaïlidis & Cie Motel Amerika v. Greece, no 55794/00, § 29, ECHR 2003-IX;Ex-roi de Greece and Others v. Greece (fond) [GC], no 25701/94, ECHR 2000-XII);Ex-roi de Greece and Others c. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no 25701/94, § 78, 28 November 2002;Fener Rum Erkek Lisesi Vakfi v. Turkey, no 34478/97, § 46, ECHR 2007-... (extracts);Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy, no 58858/00, §§ 82-83, 8 December 2005;Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 36022/97, ECHR 2003-VIII;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, ECHR 2005-VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, Series A no 98;Jantner v. Slovakia, no 39050/97, § 34, 4 March 2003;Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no 44912/98, § 35, ECHR 2004-IX;Kozacioglu c. Turkey [GC], no 2334/03, § 48, ECHR 2009-...;Malama v. Greece, no 43622/98, § 51, ECHR 2001-II;N.A. and Others c. Turkey, no 37451/97, § 39, ECHR 2005-X;Scordino c. Italy (no 1) [GC], no 36813/97, ECHR 2006-V;Serife Yigit v. Turkey [GC], no 3976/05, § 67, ECHR 2010-...;Špacek, s.r.o., v. the Czech Republic, no 26449/95, § 54, 9 November 1999;Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no 75909/01, § 109, 20 January 2009;Suljagic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no 27912/02, § 42, 3 November 2009;Urbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v. Slovakia, no 74258/01, §§ 123-124, ECHR 2007-XIII (extracts);Velikovi and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01 and 194/02, § 166, 15 March 2007;Von Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos. 71916/01, 71917/01 and 10260/02, §§ 77 and 111-112, ECHR 2005-V
Conclusion: No violation of P1-1;No violation of Art. 14+P1-1
Separate opinion: FALSE