CASE OF DVORSKI v. CROATIA
Hearing: Dvorski v. Croatia (no. 25703/11) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2015-01-21 00:00:00)
Application no.: 25703/11
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2013-11-28 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1128JUD002570311
Respondent state: HRV
Articles of the Convention: 3;6;6+6-3-c;6-1;6-3-c;35
Judges: Dmitry Dedov;Erik Møse;Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre;Julia Laffranque;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Ksenija Turković
Represented by: MAROSEVAC CAPKO S.
Issue: Article 177 § 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Strasbourg case-law cited: Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 24, Series A no. 32;Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011;Benham v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Bogumil v. Portugal, no. 35228/03, § 46, 7 October 2008;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, 10 March 2009;Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, § 99, Series A no. 80;Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, §§ 29 and 30, Series A no. 237-B;Czekalla v. Portugal, no. 38830/97, § 60, ECHR 2002 VIII;Desde v. Turkey, no. 23909/03, § 130, 1 February 2011;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 187, ECHR 2010;Güveç v. Turkey, no. 70337/01, §§ 130-131, ECHR 2009;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, ECHR 2012;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 38, Series A no. 275;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 161, Series A no. 25;Klimentyev v. Russia, no. 46503/99, §§ 116-119, 16 November 2006;Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, ECHR 2001 II;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI;Kulikowski v. Poland, no. 18353/03, § 55, 19 May 2009;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119-121, ECHR 2000-IV;Luchaninova v. Ukraine, no. 16347/02, § 62, 9 June 2011;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135/95, § 45, ECHR 2000 VI;Mamaç and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29486/95, 29487/95 and 29853/96, § 48, 20 April 2004;Martin v. Estonia, no. 35985/09, § 95-97, 30 May 2013;Neziraj v. Germany, no. 30804/07, § 45, 8 November 2012;O’Kane v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30550/96, 6 July 1999;Pakelli v. Germany, 25 April 1983, § 31, Series A no. 64;Pavlenko v. Russia, no. 42371/02, § 98, 1 April 2010;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04, §§ 77-79, 24 September 2009;Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 29, Series A no. 277 A;Prehn v. Germany (dec.), no. 40451/06, 24 August 2010;Riviere v. France, no. 33834/03, § 62, 11 July 2006;Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, § 60, ECHR 2000-II;Ryabov v. Russia, no. 3896/04, §§ 40 and 43, 31 January 2008;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272/03, § 94, 2 November 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, 27 November 2008;Sarıkaya v. Turkey, no. 36115/97, § 67, 22 April 2004;Stanford v. the United Kingdom, 23 February 1994, § 28, Series A no. 282 A;Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 50, ECHR 2000-VI;Whitfield and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 46387/99, 48906/99, 57410/00 and 57419/00, § 48, 12 April 2005;Zagorodniy v. Ukraine, no. 27004/06, §§ 51-52, 24 November 2011
Conclusion: Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Legal assistance of his own choosing)
Separate opinion: TRUE