CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ v. PORTUGAL
Hearing: Ramos Nunes De Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal (no. 55391/13) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2017-03-22 00:00:00)
Application no.: 55391/13
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2016-06-21 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005539113
Respondent state: PRT
Articles of the Convention: 6;6-1;41
Judges: András Sajó;Egidijus Kūris;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer
Represented by: RIBEIRO J.
Strasbourg case-law cited: A. Menarini Diagnostics S.r.l. v. Italy, no 43509/08, § 64, 27 September 2011;B. and P. v. the United Kingdom, nos. 36337/97 and 35974/97, § 36, ECHR 2001‑III;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no 37575/04, § 90, ECHR 2012;Brudnicka and Others v. Poland, no 54723/00, § 38, ECHR 2005-II;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no 49429/99, §§ 99-108, ECHR 2005‑XII (extracts);Chevrol v. France, no 49636/99, §§ 77-78, ECHR 2003‑III;Diennet v. France, 26 September 1995, §§ 33-34, Series A no 325‑A;Döry v. Sweden, no 28394/95, § 37, 12 November 2002;Fazliyski v. Bulgaria, no 40908/05, § 59, 16 April 2013;Fey v. Austria, 24 February 1993, §§ 27, 28 and 30, Series A no 255-A;Findlay v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997, § 73, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999‑I;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640/10, 18647/10, 18663/10, 18668/10 and 18698/10, § 122, 4 March 2014;I.D. v. Bulgaria, no 43578/98, § 45, 28 April 2005;Jurisic and Collegium Mehrerau v. Austria, no 62539/00, § 65, 27 July 2006;Kingsley v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 35605/97, § 43, ECHR 2002 IV;Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 193, ECHR 2003-VI;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no 73797/01, § 119, ECHR 2005‑XIII;Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, § 58, Series A no 43;Martinie v. France [GC], no 58675/00, §§ 39-40, ECHR 2006‑VI;Mehmet Emin Şimşek v. Turkey, no 5488/05, §§ 28-31, 28 February 2012;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056/06, § 74, 15 October 2009;Morice v. France [GC], no 29369/10, § 78, 23 April 2015;Nejdet Şahin and Perihan Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no 13279/05, §§ 49-50, 20 October 2011;Nikolova and Vandova v. Bulgaria, no 20688/04, §§ 67-76, 17 December 2013;Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, §§ 66-70, Series A no 179;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no 21722/11, ECHR 2013;Olujić v. Croatia, no 22330/05, 5 February 2009;Pullar v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, § 32, Reports 1996-III;Pursiheimo v. Finland (dec.), no 57795/00, 25 November 2003;Ruiz Torija v. Spain, 9 December 1994, §§ 29-30, Series A no 303‑A;Sacilor-Lormines v. France, no 65411/01, § 62, ECHR 2006‑XIII;Saghatelyan v. Armenia, no 7984/06, § 43, 20 October 2015;Şahin Karakoç v. Turkey, no 19462/04, § 36, 29 April 2008;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 46295/99, § 78, ECHR 2002-IV;Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, 17 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI;Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no 60860/00, § 48, 14 November 2006;Varela Assalino v. Portugal (dec.), no 64336/01, 25 April 2002;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no 63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007-IV;Wettstein v. Switzerland, no 33958/96, § 42, ECHR 2000‑XII


Conclusion: Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal;Public hearing);Damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Separate opinion: TRUE