CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
Hearing: Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2017-11-29 00:00:00)
Application no.: 27505/14
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2018-12-04 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD001021112
Respondent state: DEU
Articles of the Convention: 5;5-1;5-1-a;5-1-c;5-1-e;5-4;6;6-1;7;7-1;41
Judges: Alena Poláčková;Aleš Pejchal;Angelika Nußberger;Bertram Schmitt;Christiane Schmaltz;Christoph Grabenwarter;Dmitry Dedov;Erik Møse;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helena Jäderblom;Jon Fridrik Kjølbro;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis López Guerra;Mārtiņš Mits;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Renate Jaeger;Robert Spano;Síofra O'Leary;Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani
Represented by: AHMED A. ; TEGEBAUER I.-J.
Issue: Section 316f §§ 2 and 3 of the Introductory Act to the Criminal Code ; Preventive Detention (Distinction) Act ; Bavarian Preventive Detention Execution Act ; Sections 7(2) and 105(1) of the Juvenile Courts Act ; Sections 1(1) and 4 of the Therapy Detention Act ; Articles 63, 66 and 67d § 2 of the Criminal Code ; Basic Law
Strasbourg case-law cited: Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809/08, § 78, 21 June 2016;Aurnhammer v. Germany (dec.), no. 36356/10, § 35, 21 October 2014;B. v. Germany, no. 61272/09, § 68, 19 April 2012;Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, ECHR 2000 III;Bergmann v. Germany, no. 23279/14, 7 January 2016;Biziuk v. Poland (no. 2), no. 24580/06, § 47, 17 January 2012;Brand v. the Netherlands, no. 49902/99, § 62, 11 May 2004;C.B. v. Romania, no. 21207/03, 20 April 2010;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, ECHR 2013;Erkalo v. the Netherlands, 2 September 1998, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;Fešar v.  the  Czech  Republic, no. 76576/01, § 68, 13 November 2008;Frasik v. Poland, no. 22933/02, § 63, ECHR 2010 (extracts);G. v.  Germany, no. 65210/09, §§ 70 et seq., 7 June 2012;G.B. v. Switzerland, no. 27426/95, §§ 27 and 32-39, 30 November 2000;Glien v. Germany, no. 7345/12, 28 November 2013;Göç v. Turkey [GC], no. 36590/97, §§ 36-37, ECHR 2002 V;H.L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 45508/99, § 98, ECHR 2004 IX;H.W. v. Germany, no. 17167/11, §§ 107 and 113, 19 September 2013;Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no. 50272/99, ECHR 2003 IV;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 154, 22 May 2012;Ilnseher v.  Germany, nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14, 2 February 2017;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, § 30, Series A no. 317 B;Jendrowiak v. Germany, no. 30060/04, § 35, 14 April 2011;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140-141, ECHR 2001 VII;K. v. Germany, no. 61827/09, §§ 79 et seq., 7 June 2012;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, ECHR 2008;Karamanof v. Greece, no. 46372/09, § 42, 26 July 2011;Kharin v. Russia, no. 37345/03, § 31, 3 February 2011;Khudobin v.  Russia, no. 59696/00, § 124, ECHR 2006 XII (extracts);Klinkenbuß v. Germany, no. 53157/11, § 48, 25 February 2016;Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, §§ 96-102, 25 October 2007;Luberti v. Italy, 23  February 1984, § 28, Series A no. 75;M. v. Germany, no. 19359/04, ECHR 2009;Mercan v. Turkey (dec.), no.  56511/16, §  24, 8 November 2016;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no. 11364/03, § 106, 9 July 2009;Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 136 et seq., ECHR 2016;Musiał v. Poland [GC], no. 24557/94, § 47, ECHR 1999 II;Navarra v.  France, 23 November 1993, § 28, Series A no. 273 B;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, § 84, 24 January 2017;Petschulies v. Germany, no. 6281/13, 2 June 2016;Piotr Baranowski v. Poland, no. 39742/05, §§ 63-64, 2 October 2007;R.M.D. v. Switzerland, 26 September 1997, § 42, Reports 1997 VI;Rakevich v.  Russia, no. 58973/00, § 26, 28 October 2003;Reiner v. Germany, no. 28527/08, § 83, 19 January 2012;Ruiz Rivera v. Switzerland, no. 8300/06, § 59, 18 February 2014;S. v. Germany, no. 3300/10, § 81, 28 June 2012;S.T.S. v.  the Netherlands, no. 277/05, § 43, ECHR 2011;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229/03, § 67, ECHR 2008;Sabeva v. Bulgaria, no. 44290/07, § 58, 10 June 2010;Şahin Alpay v. Turkey, no. 16538/17, § 137, ECHR 2018;Schmitz v. Germany, no. 30493/04, 9 June 2011;Shcherbina v.  Russia, no. 41970/11, 26 June 2014;Shimovolos v.  Russia, no. 30194/09, § 51, 21 June 2011;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980/04, § 83, 12 May 2017;Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no.  60654/00, § 61, ECHR 2007 I;Smatana v. the Czech Republic, no.  18642/04, 27 September 2007;Stanev v.  Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 143 & 145, ECHR 2012,;Stephens v. Malta (no. 2), no. 33740/06, § 84, 21 April 2009;Ťupa v. the Czech Republic, no. 39822/07, § 47, 26 May 2011;V.K. v.  Russia, no. 9139/08, § 30, 4 April 2017;Van  der  Velden v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 29514/05, ECHR 2006 XV;Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, §§ 46- 47, ECHR 2000 X;Vogt v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45553/06, § 36, 3 June 2014;W.P. v. Germany, no. 55594/13, § 49, 6 October 2016;Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, Series A no. 307 A;Winterwerp v.  the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33;Witek v. Poland, no. 13453/07, § 41, 21 December 2010;Žúbor v. Slovakia, no. 7711/06, § 89, 6 December 2011
Conclusion: No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Retroactivity);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal)
Separate opinion: TRUE