CASE OF BUZADJI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Hearing: Buzadji v. Republic of Moldova (no. 23755/07) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2015-10-07 00:00:00)
Application no.: 23755/07
Document type: GRANDCHAMBER
Document date: 2016-07-05 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD002375507
Respondent state: MDA
Articles of the Convention: 5;5-1;5-1-c;5-3;34;35;35-1;41;P4-2;P4-2-1
Judges: András Sajó;Angelika Nußberger;Branko Lubarda;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Erik Møse;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ján Šikuta;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Luis López Guerra;Nebojša Vučinić;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Mahoney;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev
Represented by: NAGACEVSCHI F.
Strasbourg case-law cited: Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 47, ECHR 1999 III;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 171, ECHR 2004 II;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 64, 10 March 2009;Ciulla v. Italy, 22 February 1989, § 41, Series A no. 148;De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 44, Series A no. 77;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, § 65, Series A no. 12;Delijorgji v. Albania, no. 6858/11, § 75, 28 April 2015;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, §§ 92-93, Series A no. 39;I.A. v. France, 23 September 1998, § 108, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VII;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 140, 22 May 2012;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 461, ECHR 2004 VII;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 199, Series A no. 25;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 110, ECHR 2002 VI;Koutalidis v. Greece, no. 18785/13, § 51, 27 November 2014;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 110 et seq., ECHR 2000 XI;Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 123, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 147, ECHR 2000 IV;Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, §§ 64-66, 28 November 2002;Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, § 34, Series A no. 207;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, 20 March 1997, § 41, Reports 1997 II;Magee and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 26289/12, 29062/12 and 29891/12, 12 May 2015;Mancini v. Italy, no. 44955/98, §17, ECHR 2001 IX;McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 31-44, ECHR 2006 X;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394/03, § 119, ECHR 2010;Neumeister v. Austria, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 37, § 4;Nikolova v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 40896/98, § 60, 30 September 2004;Ninescu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 47306/07, § 53, 15 July 2014;Osmanović v. Croatia, no. 67604/10, §§ 40-41, 6 November 2012;Patsuria v. Georgia, no. 30779/04, § 67, 6 November 2007;R.P. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 38245/08, § 47, 9 October 2012;Schiesser v. Switzerland, 4 December 1979, § 31, Series A no. 34;Solmaz v. Turkey, no. 27561/02, §§ 23-24, 16 January 2007;Stögmüller v. Austria, 10 November 1969, § 15, Series A no. 9;Storck v. Germany, no. 61603/00, § 75, ECHR 2005 V;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 79, ECHR 2014 (extracts);T.W. v. Malta [GC], no. 25644/94, § 41, 29 April 1999;Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241 A;Toth v. Austria, 12 December 1991, § 70, Series A no. 224;Ţurcan and Ţurcan v. Moldova, no. 39835/05, § 54, 23 October 2007;Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, p. 23, Series A no. 7;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 39, Series A no. 33;Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, § 62, 20 February 2014
Conclusion: Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Separate opinion: TRUE