CASE OF ALIŠIĆ AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, CROATIA, SERBIA, SLOVENIA AND "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
Hearing: Ališić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and “the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (no. 60642/08) (Grand Chamber hearing, 2013-07-10 00:00:00)
Application no.: 60642/08
Document type: CHAMBER
Document date: 2012-11-06 00:00:00
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106JUD006064208
Respondent state: BIH;HRV;MKD;SRB;SVN
Articles of the Convention: 13;35;35-1;41;46;P1-1;P1-1-1
Judges: Lech Garlicki;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nicolas Bratza
Represented by: MUJCIN B.
Issue: Agreement on Succession Issues ; Section 24 of the Constitutional Court Act 2007
Strasbourg case-law cited: Babylonová v. Slovakia, no. 69146/01, § 44, ECHR 2006-VIII;Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001-V;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, §§ 189-94, ECHR 2004-V;Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 127, ECHR 2009;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, § 98, ECHR 2010;E.G. v. Poland (dec.), no. 50425/99, § 28, ECHR 2008;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, § 55, ECHR 1999-II;Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 69, ECHR 1999-V;Kovacic and Others v. Slovenia [GC], nos. 44574/98, 45133/98 and 48316/99, § 265, 3 October 2008;Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI;Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X;Mykhaylenky and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 35091/02 et al., § 43-45, ECHR 2004-XII;R. Kacapor and Others v. Serbia, nos. 2269/06 et al., §§ 97-98, 15 January 2008;Raškovic and Milunovic v. Serbia, nos. 1789/07 and 28058/07, § 71, 31 May 2011;Šekerovic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 32472/03, 4 January 2006;Suljagic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 27912/02, 3 November 2009;Trajkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 53320/99, ECHR 2002-IV;Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 50003/99, § 34, ECHR 2007-XIV
Conclusion: Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Serbia);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Slovenia);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Bosnia and Herzegovina) (Croatia) (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Serbia);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Slovenia);No violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Bosnia and Herzegovina) (Croatia) (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46 - Pilot judgment;Systemic problem;General measures);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46 - Pilot judgment;Systemic problem;General measures);Non-pecuniary damage - award
Separate opinion: TRUE