CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
Hearing: Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (no. 13216/05)  (Grand Chamber hearing, 2014-01-22 00:00:00)
Application no.: 13216/05
Document type: DECISIONS
ECLI: ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1214DEC001321605
Respondent state: ARM
Articles of the Convention: 8;13;14;34;35;35-1;35-2;35-3;P1-1
Judges: Alvina Gyulumyan;Christos Rozakis;Corneliu Bîrsan;Egbert Myjer;Elisabet Fura;Françoise Tulkens;George Nicolaou;Giorgio Malinverni;Jean-Paul Costa;Josep Casadevall;Khanlar Hajiyev;Luis López Guerra;Nicolas Bratza;Peer Lorenzen;Sverre Erik Jebens
Represented by: MULLER M. ;  OTTY T. ;  YILDIZ K.
Strasbourg case-law cited: Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721/07, §§ 131-132 and 138-139, 7 July 2011;Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no 59532/00, §§ 70 and 86, ECHR 2006-III;Chrysostomos, Papachrysostomou and Loizidou v. Turkey, nos. 15299/89, 15300/89 and 15318/89, DR 68, p. 287;Cyprus v. Turkey, no. 8007/77, §§ 104, 174-175 and 184-186, decision of 10 July 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 13, p. 228;David v. Moldova, no. 41578/05, § 28, 27 February 2008;Demades v. Turkey, no. 16219/90, §§ 14-17, 31 July 2003;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR/ECHR 2010;Dogan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 8803-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02, §§ 111-114, ECHR 2004-VI;Eugenia Michaelidou Developments Ltd and Michael Tymvios v. Turkey, no. 16163/90, §§ 15-18, 31 July 2003;Folgerø and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 15472/02, 14 February 2006;Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 36549/03, ECHR 2007-III;Içyer v. Turkey (dec.), no. 18888/02, § 73, ECHR 2006-I;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII;J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44302/02, ECHR 2007-X;Loizidou v. Turkey [GC], no. 15318/89, §§ 41-47 and 62-63, ECHR 1996-VI;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, § 251, 21 January 2011;Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC] (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos. 71916/01, 71917/01 and 10260/02, § 74, ECHR 2005-V;Moldovan and Others and Rostas and Others v. Romania (dec.), nos. 41138/98 and 64320/01, 13 March 2001;OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v. Russia, 14902/04, §§ 520-526, 20 September 2011;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece, 24 June 1993, §§ 39-46, Series A no. 260-B;Preussische Treuhand GmbH & Co. KG A.A. v. Poland (dec.), no. 47550/06, §§ 57-62, 7 October 2008;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, §§ 84-86, ECHR 2001-VIII;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, 18 September 2009;Varnava and Others v. Turkey, nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, decision of the Commission,14 April 1998, Decisions and Reports 93-B, pp. 5, 14;Vasilescu v. Romania, 22 May 1998, §§ 48-49, Reports 1998-III;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46347/99, 14 March 2005;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no. 46347/99, § 28, 22 December 2005;Zalyan, Sargsyan and Serobyan v. Armenia (déc), nos. 36894/04 and 3521/07, 11 October 2007
External sources: Articles 25 and 28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969
Conclusion: Admissible