International Military Tribunal for the Far East argued against the exclusion of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings .
< /ref > Justice Radhabinod Pal argued that the exclusion of Western colonialism and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from the list of crimes and the lack of judges from the vanquished nations on the bench signified the `` failure of the Tribunal to provide anything other than the opportunity for the victors to retaliate . '' ``
International Military Tribunal for the Far East