Which role do non-source items play in the social sciences? A case study in political science in Germany
Publications that are not indexed by citation indices such as Web of Science (WoS) or Scopus are called non-source items. These have so far been neglected by most bibliometric analyses. The central issue of this study is to investigate the characteristics of non-source items and the effect of their inclusion in bibliometric evaluations in the social sciences, specifically German political science publications. The results of this study show that non-source items significantly increase the number of publications (+1,350%) and to a lesser extent the number of citations from SCIE, SSCI, and A&HCI (+150%) for evaluated political scientists. 42% of non-source items are published as book chapters. Edited books and books are cited the most among non-source items. About 40% of non-source items are in English, while 80% of source items are in English. The citation rates of researchers taking non-source items into account are lower than those from source items, partially as a result of the limited coverage of WoS. In contrast, the H-indices of researchers taking only non-source items into account are higher than those from source items. In short, the results of this study show that non-source items should be included in bibliometric evaluations, regardless of their impact or the citations from them. The demand for a more comprehensive coverage of bibliometric database in the social sciences for a higher quality of evaluations is shown.
non-source items social sciences political science publication patterns research evaluation 01 94 a14