a comparison of selected conceptual frameworks for simulation modeling
The purpose of this paper is to compare thirteen Conceptual Frameworks (CFs) selected from among several categories of applicability to discrete-event simulation modeling. Each CF is briefly reviewed to provide the background information required for the comparison. Based on the insights gained in applying the CFs to the modeling of a complex traffic intersection system, the CFs are compared relative to their distinct characteristics and capabilities. Comparative comments are grouped according to the design guidance and implementation guidance features of the CFs. Conclusions highlight the inadequacies of the CFs and the importance of research in CF development.
comparisons simulation model paper applications informal complexity traffic intersection systems capabilities design implementation feature research developer discrete event simulation  framework  relation