Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar
Purpose - Google Scholar (GS) has shed the beta label on the fifth anniversary of launching its service This paper aims to address this issue. Design/methodology/approach As good as GS is through its keyword search option to find information about tens of millions of documents, many of them in open access full text format, it is as had for metadata-based searching when, beyond keywords in the title, abstract, descriptor and/or full text, the searcher also has to use author name, journal tale and/or publication year in specifying the query This paper provides a review of recent developments in Google Scholar Findings GS is especially inappropriate for bibliometric searches, for evaluating the publishing performance and impact of researchers and journals Originality/value Even if the clean up of Google Scholar accelerates it should not be forgotten that those evaluations of individuals and journals that have been done based on Google Scholar in the past few years have grossly handicapped many authors and journals whose name was replaced by phantom entries
information searches text retrieval