A framework for ontologically-grounded probabilistic matching
In all scientific disciplines there are multiple competing and complementary theories that have been, and are being, developed, There are also observational data about which the theories can potentially make predictions. To enable semantic inter-operation between the data and the theories, we need ontologies to define the vocabulary used in them. For example, in the domain of minerals exploration, research geologists spend careers developing models of where to find particular minerals. Similarly, geological surveys publish geological descriptions of their jurisdictions as well as instances of mineral occurrences. The community is starting to develop standardized ontologies to enable consistent use of vocabulary and the semantic inter-operation between the model descriptions and the instance descriptions. This paper describes a framework for representing instances and theories using these ontologies, and describes ontologically-mediated probabilistic matching between instances and theories. We give an example of our matcher in the geology domain, where the problem is to determine what minerals can be expected at a location, or which locations may be expected to contain particular minerals. This is challenging as models and instances are built asynchronously, and they are described in terms of individuals and properties at varied levels of abstraction and detail. This paper shows, given a model, an instance, and a role assignment that specifies which individuals correspond to each other, how to construct a Bayesian network that can compute the probability that the instance matches the model. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ontologies models instances individuals bayesian networks probabilistic reasoning scientific theories relational models