Considerations for appointing an external examiner of a PhD in the biomedical sciences in Sweden: a questionnaire-based survey
A survey of 170 Swedish mentors of PhD-students found that expertise in the research field and avoidance of conflict of interest were big motivators for finding an examiner from abroad for PhD theses. The survey also identified that concern by supervisors for facilitating the career paths of younger scientists in terms of introductions to potential labs for post-doctoral work and obtaining high quality neutral review of ones research was also important, as was the desire to set up collaborations. An expectation from the management of ones university of the PR-value of a foreign senior person as examiner also played a part. Although few were willing to admit that PR for ones own group was a motivating factor. A small fraction of responders expressed concern that, as some of the costs of the PhD-examination were being shifted on to the research groups themselves, this might impact the current situation. Language also played a subordinate role. To get the best out of the visiting examiner, it was important to educate and instruct them in their role in a Swedish PhD-examination protocol. Male supervisors had had more PhD-candidates than female, but they also had used more Sweden-based examiners than their female colleagues. We conclude that using a foreign examiner was motivated by factors that are likely to prevail for the foreseeable future. This Swedish practice may also provide a template for a common standard.
conflict of interest pr phd process cross-border collaboration academic stringency gender issues questionnaire