A comparison of second- and sixth-order methods for large-eddy simulations
Large-eddy simulations of spatially developing planar turbulent jets are performed using a compact finite-difference scheme of sixth-order and an advective upstream splitting method-based method of second-order accuracy. The applicability of these solution schemes with different subgrid scale models and their performance for realistic turbulent flow problems are investigated. Solutions of the turbulent channel flow are used as an inflow condition for the turbulent jets. The results compare well with each other and with analytical and experimental data. For both solution schemes, however, the influence of the subgrid scale model on the time averaged turbulence statistics is small. This is known to be the case for upwind schemes with a dissipative truncation error, but here it is also observed for the high-order compact scheme. The reason is found to be the application of a compact high-frequency filter, which has to be used with strongly stretched computational grids to suppress high-frequency oscillations. The comparison of the results of the two schemes shows hardly any difference in the quality of the solutions. The second-order scheme, however, is computationally more efficient. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
large-eddy simulation subgrid scale model compact scheme upwind-based scheme