An AI formalism for competing claims of identification: Capturing the "Smemorato di Collegno" amnesia case
A formal representation is given of the situational structure, and the agents' beliefs about personal identity, in the Smemorato di Collegno amnesia case tried in 1927, in Pollenza, Italy. Another section discusses and formalizes a sample heuristic rule for conjecturing whether an individual identity other than personal, being conveyed by a toponym., was used literally or fictitiously in a given historical corpus of legal casenotes. For example, a landlocked city being named and referred to as though it was a sea port is a fairly good cue for assuming that the toponym is a disguise. Yet, the interpretation is governed by other conventions, when in a play by Shakeaspeare it is stated that a given scene is set on the sea coast of Bohemia. Further discussion of a situational casuistry for identification (especially individual and personal) along with more formal representations will appear in a companion paper [84], also at the disciplinary meet of AI formalisms and legal applications.
amnesia agents' beliefs heuristic rules epistemic states personal identification legal history (bruneri v. canella) names (fictitious toponyms) referent disambiguation conventions in textual genres