From: NIPS.cc/2018/Workshop/Spatiotemporal/Paper17/AnonReviewer2
relevance: 4: high
impact: 5: very high
novelty: 5: very high

From: NIPS.cc/2018/Workshop/Spatiotemporal/Paper17/AnonReviewer2
evaluation: 
Authors tackle a pretty innovative problem using state-of-the-art techniques in a neat way. 
Well written paper. Good problem formulation, and experiments. 
Authors compare different architectures in their own problem. It is not possible to compare their work with other works of literature due to the novelty of the problem.
Good work.

Suggestions:
One suggestion for the temporal dynamics modelling would be to explore an architecture that preserves spatial and temporal information at the same time (not in consecutive steps having first cnn and then LSTM) such as in formulas 9-12 of the architecture in this paper  https://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.06432.pdf
Also, consider exploring GRU which has proven to be a good alternative with advantages over LSTM
Another suggestion for future work would be to consider a wider range of activities and extend it to other species of animals.

From: NIPS.cc/2018/Workshop/Spatiotemporal/Paper17/AnonReviewer1
evaluation: The application of the paper is interesting and would be helpful in the conservation of endangered species. The approach is novel and the paper is also written well.

From: NIPS.cc/2018/Workshop/Spatiotemporal/Paper17/AnonReviewer1
relevance: 5: very high
impact: 4: high
novelty: 5: very high