From: ICML.cc/2021/Workshop/AML/Program_Chairs
title: Paper Decision
decision: Accept (Poster)
comment: This paper proposed two feature mappings and visualized these features in DRL policies. The concerns of the reviewer could be further addressed.

From: ICML.cc/2021/Workshop/AML/Paper66/Reviewer_QG1i
title: The results are interesting but unconvincing
review: This paper proposed two feature mappings and visualized these features in DRL policies.  The paper further investigated the sparsity of these two mappings, and emphasize different vulnerabilities for these mappings. This paper provides some insightful ideas.

My main concern of this work is it over claims the results. This paper didn't provide the way on choosing the observation which weakens the credibility of this work. 

Less curial problems:
1) Alg. 2 return K instead of K(i,j)
2) There are some small mistakes in Fig. 2




rating: Accept
confidence: 5: The reviewer is absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct and very familiar with the relevant literature