From: NeurIPS.cc/2021/Workshop/DistShift/Program_Chairs
title: Paper Decision
decision: Accept (Poster)
comment: Reviewers agreed that the paper proposed a simple and intuitive method for the SSDA setting, and that the experimental results were solid and compelling. They had some questions about the motivation/intuition behind specific choices made in the method, which would be helpful to discuss. It would also be helpful for the authors to describe more clearly what the validation/hyperparameter tuning procedure was across the paper, especially since in the few-shot setting, validation data from the target might also be limited (see, for example, https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.10860). If that is the case, how reliable/noisy are the results?