From: ICML.cc/2021/Workshop/AML/Program_Chairs
title: Paper Decision
decision: Accept (Poster)
comment: The reviewer noticed several advantages of this paper as well as some shortcoming. The authors can further address the reviewer's comments.

From: ICML.cc/2021/Workshop/AML/Paper58/Reviewer_3qKJ
title: This paper is easy to follow. However, the paper is in lack of novelty.
review: pros:
1. This paper is easy to follow, and the structure is complete.
2. The proposed logit attack is simple but effective in targeted adversarial attack.
cons:
1. The word 'form' between line 074 and 075 in the left column should be 'from'.
2. The experiment results are not so convincing. It is claimed that directly using the C&W loss performs worse than this logit loss. However, the comparison experiment with C&W loss is not mentioned. Actually, there exists targeted C&W loss.
3. The design of logit loss is actually too simple and included in C&W loss. It is in lack of novelty.
rating: Accept
confidence: 4: The reviewer is confident but not absolutely certain that the evaluation is correct