Conversas na Internet
Autor: Daniel Nérso | Publicado: 2007-04-10T17:34:00-03:00

Bom, já que o blog tá meio parado, resolvi postar uma coisa inédita aqui, uma conversa que tive no msn agora há pouco com um amigo dos confrades, que na verdade também é um confrade, o Metralha(Daniel). Eu diria que a repercussão desta conversa no mundo cultural, artístico e sócio-político será notável, embora o conteúdo ainda está para ser compreendido, no seu devido tempo.Daniel diz:ah sim... deveras.Nérso diz:é...Nérso diz:yeahDaniel diz:sexNérso diz:lovelyDaniel diz:pussy fucker for money that he/she would use to buy a dildo to fuck him/herself while a Dog eats its own shit just for fun.Daniel diz:twiceNérso diz:the dog eating his own shit ocurrs independently from the whole scene I see...Nérso diz:droga.. preciso aprender inglês..Daniel diz:that's where you're wrong!Daniel diz:You see... the whole scene IS the whole scene. Otherwise, it would be two scenes... and then, MAYBE, they could occur independently.Daniel diz:Do you what I mean?Daniel diz:ops... faltou um "know".Daniel diz:heheNérso diz:yeah.. but I still think that the pussy fucker could still buy a dildo to fuck him/herself, eighter the dog eats the shit or notDaniel diz:Unfortunately, u're wrong again, my friend.Nérso diz:the dog eating his own shit is just a metaphor for life itselfNérso diz:it happens, independently of all other thingsDaniel diz:The denpendency between the shit eater Dog and de pussy fucker lays exactly in the middle of the problem.Nérso diz:but there is no conection with them at all, they coexist, but they didnt need tooNérso diz:and that connection is what we call "human relations"Daniel diz:And, as u should know, once removed the middle of something, this something  becomes two things.Daniel diz:And both new thing will have they own middle.Nérso diz:but its u who settled them together, they existed in their own worlds...Daniel diz:Yes indeed, but while separeted, they don't constitute a problem.Daniel diz:And that's, my friend, is the problem.Nérso diz:odeio num sabe fala inglêsDaniel diz:hehehe.... tá muito idiota isso!Daniel diz:heheNérso diz:let me try to explainDaniel diz:eu entendi o que vc disse..Nérso diz:the dog eating his own shit, and the pussy fucker are just independent eventsDaniel diz:mas num é pra fazer sentido.Daniel diz:"Read to me" now...Nérso diz:u can put them together, but they wont gain any other meaning other than the ones they had beforeDaniel diz:there IS a problem.Daniel diz:and the problem is:Nérso diz:u could break the whole situation if u say something likeNérso diz:u have a pussy fucker, a dildo, a dog, and the dog's shitNérso diz:there r rules implying that the pussy fucker will buy the dildo to fuck himselfNérso diz:and a rule that the dog is eating his own shitDaniel diz:But u missing the essence of the scene!Nérso diz:but there is no rule connecting the shit eater dog and the pussy fucker and his dildoNérso diz:thats why they can be separatedDaniel diz:But what god has a shit eater dog by him self??Daniel diz:sorry... "good"Daniel diz:And what good has a self fucker by dildo all alone?Nérso diz:nothing at all, abstract art perhaps... but the real question is, what meaning will he add to the pussy fucker situation?Daniel diz:Exactly!Daniel diz:The meaning, u will find when u r ready!Nérso diz:- chico xavierDaniel diz:Amen.