Como os Poderosos do Mundo Acham que Podem Evitar Novos Trumps e Brexits.
Autor: Pedro Erik | Publicado: 2017-01-18T11:30:00-08:00





O site Zero Hedge traz um ótimo relato de uma reunião em Davos, na Suíça, entre a chefe do FMI, Christine Lagarde, e multimilionários, sobre como evitar a frustração da classe média mundial que elege Trump e decide pelo Brexit.

Como eles acham que podem evitar que o povo vote por Trump e Brexit?

Eles acham que o estado deve distribuir mais riqueza, dando dinheiro direto às pessoas, fazendo mais gastos (keynesianos) em infraestrutura, e tributando mais.&nbsp;

Esse pessoal é idiota mesmo e querem continuar mamando no Estado.

Vejam o relato abaixo:


Lagarde Urges Wealth Redistribution To Fight Populism

As we scoffed oveernight,&nbsp;who better than a handful of semi, and not so semi, billionaires - perplexed by the populist backlash of the past year - to sit down and discuss among each other how a "squeezed and Angry" middle-class should be fixed. And so it was this morning as IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde, Italian Finance Minister Pier Carlo Padoan and Founder, Chairman and Co-CIO of Bridgewater Associates, Ray Dalio, espoused on what's needed to restore growth in the middle class and confidence in the future.




The conclusions of the discussion are as farcical as the entire Davos debacle, as three people completely disconnected from the real world, sat down and provided these "answers"...

As Bloomberg reports,&nbsp;while&nbsp;International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde urged a list of policies from programs to retrain workers to more social spending...










Lagarde said policy makers “really have to think it through and see what can be done” given the feedback from voters who say "No.” Among measures that could be implemented are fiscal and structural reforms, she added.



“But it needs to be granular, it needs to be regional, it needs to be focused on what will people get out of it and it probably means more redistribution than we have in place at the moment,” Lagarde told the panel.



The&nbsp;establishment academics&nbsp;also had plenty of textbook declarations and jabs to make...










“We need to go to a system where we are protecting workers, not jobs, and society will help people retrain or reorient,” Richard Baldwin, professor of international economics at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva, said in an interview in Davos.&nbsp;“There may just be a need to man up. We have to pay for the social cohesion that we need to keep our societies advancing, and accept that this may be a higher tax burden on people.”



The panel saw former U.S. Treasury Secretary&nbsp;Lawrence Summers attacking Donald Trump saying populism is “invariably counter-productive”&nbsp;for those it claims to help.



“Our President-elect has made four or five phone calls to four or five companies, largely suspending the rule of law, and extorting them into relocating dozens or perhaps even a few hundred jobs into plants in the United States,” Summers said.



Summers’s recipe for dealing with populism twisted Trump’s campaign slogan.&nbsp;“Our broad objective should be to make America greater than ever before,” Summers said. “That’s very different from making it great again.”



He suggested three major steps.&nbsp;First, “public investment on an adequate scale starting from infrastructure” also embracing technology and education; second, “making global integration work for ordinary people” and third, “enabling the dreams of every young American” including education, finding work and home purchasing.


And ironically, the wealthiest of all the panel members was perhaps the clearest...










Hedge Fund billionaire Ray Dalio warned on a panel chaired by Bloomberg Television’s Francine Lacqua that&nbsp;“we may be at a point where globalization is ending, and provincialization and nationalization is taking hold.”



“I want to be loud and clear: populism scares me,”&nbsp;Dalio said. “The No. 1 issue economically as a market participant is how populism manifests itself over the next year or two.”

So, to sum up - a bunch of rich, disconnected elites in Switzerland believe the world's "middle class" will be better off if policy-makers "man-up" and increase taxes on the "wealthy" in order to redistribute wealth to the masses to "pay for social cohesion." Yeah, that will work... we suspect echoes of "Four more years" will be heard in 2020 if they follow that path.