Question: Argument:1. The High Representative will not only act as a spokesman for EU nations when they agree on foreign policies , but will act as a catalyst around which external policy will increasingly become coordinated .
2. By chairing meetings of EU foreign ministers , he or she will be able to shape the agenda and influence the outcomes of meetings , encouraging member states increasingly to think in terms of common foreign policy positions .
3. They will have added authority from their ability to speak for the EU in the UN Security Council .
4. The High Representative will also direct the EUs new External Action Service , which brings together policy specialists from both the Council and Commission in a unique manner -LRB- ranging from the Arctic region to nuclear safety and enlargement -RRB- .
5. With representatives all over the world the EU will develop a foreign service capable of creating and articulating policy positions in a manner that few national governments can match .
6. Over time this will promote the evolution of a true EU foreign and security policy , and will contribute significantly to increased European consciousness among EU citizens and further moves to political unity .
Claim: The High Representative will be a catalyst and a facilitator for decision-making.


Sentences: 1. Corbyn , and a move to the left , will bring Labour back to its core values rather than supporting Conservative policies and austerity that harms individuals .
2. More recently Labour abstained on a Conservative welfare bill that many felt was too harsh in its cuts .
3. In the last parliament Labour supported there being a cap on welfare spending .
4. The original values of the Labour party were the common ownership of the means of production , distribution , and exchange and even today the Labour party aims to serve the public interest as well as to create a just society , which judges its strength by the condition of the weak as much as the strong , an open democracy , in which government is held to account by the people , and a healthy environment .
5. Clause IV , , , accessed 15 September 2015 Wintour , Patrick , Miliband : Labour not abandoning its values with cap on welfare spending , , 6 June 2013 , Eaton , George , Welfare bill passed as 48 Labour MPs defy leadership and vote against , , 20 July 2015 ,
What claim can be made from these sentences?
Brings labour back to its core values


This house believes NAFTA has benefitted all parties involved.
Claim: The US has benefitted from NAFTA through lower prices and increased trade.


Question:
Summarize the argument implied by these sentences. 1. If that requires pain to be inflicted on an individual to save the lives of millions then it is simply practical to do so .
2. If authorities have good reason to believe that there is a realistic threat of a nuclear explosion in downtown Manhattan or Tel Aviv then it is vital that as much information as possible can be gathered as quickly as possible .
3. The harm represented by the pain caused to a single individual is outweighed by the possibility that information gathered from a forceful interrogation might save thousands of lives
Answer:
In the event of an imminent attack it is only reasonable to use force to find information


Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. Secondly , it would change as a persons salary rises or falls over a twenty year period , being more sustainable and increasing the chance of the costs being recovered .
2. Thirdly , rather than giving a person a required fee to pay it would be giving a person a chance to pay over a set time period , reducing the financial impact of the bill .
3. A graduate tax would potentially give universities more than they get from traditional funding , as a contribution would depend directly on a persons salary rather than just being a flat rate fare for services rendered over a short time .
4. For example a person earning 40,000 would pay about 125 per month .
5. -LRB- Shepard , J. 2009 -RRB- That over 20 years could amount to 30,000 , more than enough to cover the costs of a university education in a way which is manageable .
6. Admittedly that sum is based on a person rising like a rocket but it still hints at the possibilities of the tax and how it could bring in more money than simply universities rising their fees .

Claim: A graduate tax would make university funding more sustainable


Sentences: 1. 31 January 2013 .
2. Fox News Latino .
3. Cuba : Prominent Blogger-Dissidents Receive Contradictory Results on Visa Petitions .
4. This policy would correct for it and help bolster the cause of justice on all fronts .
5. It is through offering amnesty that democracies can provide the catalyst for the change they avow to be the paramount aim of human civilization .
6. The guarantee of amnesty also removes the perceived randomness of such offerings that currently occur , as in the recent case of Cuba in which two bloggers of similar pedigree asked for asylum in the US , but only one received it .
7. Such inconsistency has bred fear in the minds of dissidents .
8. That protection is absolutely crucial to the development of more dissent in the blogosphere and on the ground .
9. Only by nurturing dissent can it ever take root and overcome the vast powers of authoritarian government .
10. The promise of protection is hugely powerful because it gives bloggers a safety net to fall back on .
What claim can be made from these sentences?

Answer: Democracies have an obligation to shield these people and to encourage further dissent