Question: Input: I had drunk too much, I confess, though we all had. Somehow, Tasha and I began to argue the worth of Solevgrad jazz, as inconsequential a topic as I can imagine. She had studied it in school, so she thought herself as an expert. I once had a neighbor who played it constantly, loudly, and badly, so I thought I knew it better. Malaquez tried to mediate, but I saw him as siding with Tasha. So, I think, did she. The subject shifted from music to Tasha's obsession with fame, undoubtedly by a leap that I made. She had no choice but to follow. (I do not remember any of this well, just now, nor do I care to. Those who are truly curious may look at the last act of "Captured Moments.") I remember suggesting, with characteristic tact, that she add Emil to her small list of major accomplishments. Malaquez glanced away, embarrassed. Tasha looked at me as if to say, "I will." She said, "I feel sorry for you, Nardo. I'll see Emil home." "Yes," I said, "Do that," and did not care what she did, or why. Emil asked, "You're all right?" I muttered something he must have interpreted as assent. They both walked up to Emil's home while I watched the scarlet moonlight ripple on distant waves. Disgusted with Tasha but more disgusted with myself, I finally realized she would not return that night and went into The Sleeping Flamingo to drink myself to sleep. She had not come home when I woke in mid-morning. 

Does the response "Add Emil to her list of major accomplishments" correctly answer the question "What does Nardo assent to Tasha doing?"?

OPTIONS:
- no
- yes
***
Output: yes


Input: A married couple and their three young adult children , a son and two daughters , live in a large compound with a garden and a swimming pool .  A tall fence surrounds the property and the children have never been on the other side of it , for their parents have kept them unaware of the outside world , even of the existence of the telephone .  They are taught different meanings for everyday words .  For example , they are told that a `` zombie '' is `` a small yellow flower , '' and that `` sea '' is a chair .  The parents promise that each child will be ready to venture outside the compound once she or he has lost a dogtooth .  Although the children are told they have a brother just on the other side of the barrier , he never appears .  The only non-family member to come into the house is Christina , a young woman who works as a security guard at the father's factory .  She is driven by the father to the compound traveling both ways blindfolded where she performs sexual favors for the son .  Dissatisfied with his preference for intercourse , Christina seeks oral sex from the elder daughter in exchange for a headband.  The elder daughter obliges but does not recognize the significance of performing cunnilingus .  Later , she gives the headband to her younger sister , in exchange for being licked on the shoulder , Which is marked by an unexplained scar .  The parents have tricked the children into believing that overhead planes are merely toys .  They allow the children to search for toy planes that they have planted on the grounds , and the child that finds the toy owns it . 

Does the response "A tooth from a dog" correctly answer the question "What do the children have to lose in order to meet their "brother"?"?

OPTIONS:
- no
- yes
***
Output: no


Input: Ratners Group PLC, a fast-growing, acquisition-minded London-based jeweler, raised its price for Seattle-based specialty jeweler Weisfield's Inc. to $57.50 a share, or $62.1 million, from $50 a share, or $55 million, after another concern said it would be prepared to outbid Ratners's initial offer. The other concern wasn't identified. Ratners's chairman, Gerald Ratner, said the deal remains of "substantial benefit to Ratners." In London at mid-afternoon yesterday, Ratners's shares were up 2 pence (1.26 cents), at 260 pence ($1.64). The sweetened offer has acceptances from more than 50% of Weisfield's shareholders, and it is scheduled for completion by Dec. 10. The acquisition of 87-store Weisfield's raises Ratners's U.S. presence to 450 stores. About 30% of Ratners's profit already is derived from the U.S. 

Does the response "It was not a good deal as it ensured that the other concern's offer would not be accepted" correctly answer the question "Was the increased share price a good or bad deal for Ratners Group PLC?"?

OPTIONS:
- no
- yes
***
Output: no


Input: Right after the Pentagon was hit, NEADS learned of another possible hijacked aircraft. It was an aircraft that in fact had not been hijacked at all. After the second World Trade Center crash, Boston Center managers recognized that both aircraft were transcontinental 767 jetliners that had departed Logan Airport. Remembering the "we have some planes" remark, Boston Center guessed that Delta 1989 might also be hijacked. Boston Center called NEADS at 9:41 and identified Delta 1989, a 767 jet that had left Logan Airport for Las Vegas, as a possible hijack. NEADS warned the FAA's Cleveland Center to watch Delta 1989. The Command Center and FAA headquarters watched it too. During the course of the morning, there were multiple erroneous reports of hijacked aircraft. The report of American 11 heading south was the first; Delta 1989 was the second. NEADS never lost track of Delta 1989, and even ordered fighter aircraft from Ohio and Michigan to intercept it. The flight never turned off its transponder. NEADS soon learned that the aircraft was not hijacked, and tracked Delta 1989 as it reversed course over Toledo, headed east, and landed in Cleveland. But another aircraft was heading toward Washington, an aircraft about which NORAD had heard nothing: United 93. United Airlines Flight 93 FAA Awareness. At 9:27, after having been in the air for 45 minutes, United 93 acknowledged a transmission from the Cleveland Center controller. This was the last normal contact the FAA had with the flight. Less than a minute later, the Cleveland controller and the pilots of aircraft in the vicinity heard "a radio transmission of unintelligible sounds of possible screaming or a struggle from an unknown origin." The controller responded, seconds later: "Somebody call Cleveland?"This was followed by a second radio transmission, with sounds of screaming. 

Does the response "He asked if someone called Cleveland" correctly answer the question "How did the Cleveland controller respond to a transmission that seemed to signify trouble?"?

OPTIONS:
- no
- yes
***
Output:
Answer: yes