Question: Argument:1. Research by the National Literacy Trust found that A key ingredient in determining future social class is language : the basic tool for thought , argument , reasoning and making sense of a confusing world .
2. If language is such a key part of what makes up the class system , and people in general believe in equal opportunities and the eventual dissolution of that class system , then surely making the language more accessible to those who do not receive as good an education is a step in the direction of a fairer society .
3. Those from affluent backgrounds are likely to hear , speak and be taught many more words in their formative years - making the language easier to learn for those who do not have this advantage is surely a good thing .
Claim: Changing the language could have social benefits - it would remove a layer of class superiority which is presently judged by literacy.

Argument:1. The patient is not capable of forming unimpaired and rational judgements concerning the consequences -LRB- British Medical Association 1992 -RRB- .
2. There have been court cases that have confirmed that force feeding should be allowed when a patient is considered mentally ill .
3. Anorectic patients are typically treated under mental health legislation -LRB- e.g. the UK 1983 Act -RRB- .
4. They do not make a free choice because they are not rationally able to weigh up decisions and consequences , they feel fat when they obviously are not and are irrational as they are willing to starve themselves to the point of death when suicide is not their intent .
5. For example the case of vs. in 1994 it was judged , that B -LRB- a borderline personality disorder patient , which involves suffering from an irresistible desire to inflict-self-harm -RRB- can be force fed , even though she did not give consent to the treatment .
6. The court explained that because she was not aware of the seriousness of her condition and she had found it difficult to break out of the cycle of self-punishment , she was deemed unfit to make decisions about her nutrition .
Claim: Anorectic patients are not able to make the decision for themselves.

Argument:1. This includes around the border town of Tecate , Calif. , and a huge expanse stretching from Calexico , Calif. , to Douglas , Ariz. , which is virtually the entire length of Arizona 's border with Mexico .
2. The Secure Fence Act of 2006 authorized the construction of at least two layers of reinforced fencing in high-crossing and high-risk sections along the border .
3. An additional section will wind through Texas , from Del Rio to Eagle Pass , and from Laredo to Brownsville .
4. Another section would stretch over most of the southern border of New Mexico .
5. Weisman , Jonathan .
6. This would not only be a fence but will include technology to secure `` operational control '' of the border by using unmanned aerial vehicles , ground-based sensors , radar , satellites and cameras .
7. `` With Senate Vote , Congress Passes Border Fence Bill . ''
Claim: The fence is a practical way to stop immigration and large parts of it have been built.

Argument:1. The international community has helped the global economy adapt to rising globalization , with such bodies as the World Trade Organization , the World Bank , and the International Monetary Fund .
2. Migration is an essential part of globalization , but there is no international body regulating the flow of workers around the world .
3. Jason Deparle of the New York Times writes , The most personal and perilous form of movement is the most unregulated .
4. States make -LRB- and often ignore -RRB- their own rules , deciding who can come , how long they stay , and what rights they enjoy . ''
5. Because the issue of migrant rights is a global one , concerned with human rights and the domestic and international actions of states , a U.N. convention is an appropriate solution .
6. The U.N. is the best body to act because although the situation for migrant workers may be slightly different in each state , there are basic rights that they all deserve .
7. In addition , even if each state sought individually to protect migrant rights , they might not be able to , because governing migration takes coordination between states .
8. With international legislation , states would be held accountable for protecting migrant rights ; and , migrant policies and protections would be better coordinated .
9. The U.N. Convention would fill this gap .
10. Indeed , the U.N.s solution to regulate migration represents a reasonable and thorough approach .
Claim:
Answer: The U.N. Convention is the best available mechanism for addressing the widespread problem of migrant rights.