Question: Question:
Summarize the argument implied by these sentences. 1. Currently , there are many projects around the world demonstrating the feasibility of CCS .
2. One well-known example is the Sleipner-project in Norway .
3. This site has been in operation since 1996 .
4. Another example is the Weyburn-Midale project in Canada , which has stored over 20 million tonnes of carbon dioxide since October 2000 .
5. -LRB- 2011 -RRB- We can easily implement CCS because the technology is well-known and tested .
6. The technology of injecting carbon dioxide into gas - and oil fields has been used already when drilling for gas and oil : oil companies use carbon dioxide injections to push out oil and gas .
7. -LRB- , 2005 -RRB- .
Answer:
CCS can be implemented now

Question:
Summarize the argument implied by these sentences. 1. A subsequent rise in mortgage defaults left banks less willing to lend money .
2. To sustain soaring house prices , banks lent mortgages to people who could n't afford them , through so-called `` innovations , '' such as interest-only mortgages , 100 % mortgages and lending to people with poor credit histories .
3. Rather than stopping this trend , governments and financial institutions tried to adapt to and profit from it .
4. Before the financial crisis , housing prices were rising fast .
5. Therefore , banks should be forced to lend money to young people trying to enter into the property market .
6. It is unfair that first , homes became so unaffordable because of bad decisions by banks and , that second , the same banks are now lending mortgages to buy-to-let landlords , who are buying up houses to rent out to young people who , otherwise , would have been first-time buyers .
7. So , as mortgages have become more expensive , many people have been priced out of the market .
Answer:
Keeping housing prices artificially high caused the global recession, and would do so again.

Question:
Summarize the argument implied by these sentences. 1. The nation-state is the fundamental building block of the international system , and is recognized as such in all international treaties and organizations -LRB- Mearsheimer , 1993 -RRB- .
2. States are recognized as having the right to defend themselves , and this right must extend to the possession of a strategic national missile defense system .
3. The United States has every right to develop such a system if it will furnish a greater measure of defense for its citizens and interests .
4. US military technology is the most advanced and prodigiously financed in the world , which is why it is generally the United States that stands at the forefront of new defense and combat systems .
5. The National Missile Defense program is simply the newest tool in the arsenal of the worlds greatest military , whose purpose is entirely defensive .
6. To shield itself from potential ballistic missile , and even nuclear , attack the United States has the right to build a missile shield to defend itself and its allies under its aegis .
7. There is no principled justification for a country to not pursue defense initiatives that benefit itself and that it wishes to pursue .
Answer:

Answer: As a matter of principle, every country, including the United States, has the right to defend itself to the best of its technological and economic ability