Question: Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. They need not prevent the creation of controversial and challenging forms of free expression either .
2. Neither of these outcomes does anything to promote a culture of free and frank discussion within the societies affected .
3. Further , the protests also brought individuals who would ordinarily have considered themselves moderates into contact with violent extremists .
4. The offensive content of the cartoons gave credence and legitimacy to sects and clerics espousing absolutist ideas that have no space for compromise or understanding .
5. These images led to widespread protests and violence in both western states and majority Muslim countries .
6. Legal definitions and enforcement of standards of responsibility do not preclude individuals from pursuing dangerous or entrepreneurial business ventures or public works .
7. Much like laws that prevent the negligent operation of businesses , anti-blasphemy laws would set a minimal standard of responsible conduct in order to ensure that publications did not cause a dangerous level of offense to significant numbers ordinary and rational religious believers .
8. However , they does require writers , journalists and artists to apply their reason and their sense to content that they want to publish for mass consumption .
9. The legal measures that side proposition supports do not oblige free thinkers to remain silent in the face of zealotry and bigotry .
10. Coexistence between communities with radically different creeds , values and viewpoints needs to be carefully supervised in multi-cultural societies .

Claim: Social cohesion and hate speech


Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. , 5 May 1992 ,
2. Elert , Glenn , The SAT Aptitude of Demographics ?
3. Two questions wrong out of 80 on the math section of the SAT may well produce a score of 760 while three questions wrong will result in a 720 .
4. Most tests were designed in an earlier era when far fewer students took them.The large number of students who now take tests like the SATs results in a situation in which the scoring scale magnifies small differences in performance into large differences in scores .
5. Indeed on average for 88 % of applicants their SAT score will predict their final college grade rank no more accurately than a pair of dice .
6. 40 points can mean difference between admission and rejection for many candidates , while telling us nothing about the different abilities of the students involved .

Claim: Standardized tests exaggerate small differences in performance


Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. Lowering gas prices is therefore essential to improved economic outlook , and therefore offshore drilling should be considered as a viable option .
2. The Energy Information Administration -LRB- EIA -RRB- estimates that offshore drilling could generate 18 billion barrels of crude oil .
3. Offshore drilling will lower gas -LRB- petroleum -RRB- prices .
4. The US consumes huge amounts of oil , and therefore needs to produce more .
5. While it consumes 18,771,400 barrels of oil every day .
6. The ban has prevented the US from taking advantage of this known resource .
7. Greater availability of domestic oil will result in lower gas prices for American consumers .
8. In 2011 , gas prices are $ 4 a gallon and it is thought that these high gas prices jeopardize the economic recovery .
9. Considering how oil is used in various aspects of American life and industry , high gas prices contribute to economic health .

Claim: Offshore drilling will lead to lower gas prices and economic health.


Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. The Global fund has for a long time been telling countries , they need more funds , yet they have not gotten them yet .
2. Part of the reason is probably that there is too little pressure on countries .
3. With the increased funding of the USA , there will also be a greater demand to invest more from other countries .
4. The USA is still a big player in the global economic and political market .
5. America is seen by many people over the world as an influential country that paves the way in international policies .
6. An increase in funding will also have therefore a major effect on other donor countries .
7. So through pressure -LRB- or the lack there of -RRB- , countries control each other and many times also justify their actions .
8. So in the case of increased funding a greater financial support by the US will also represent a wakeup call for other countries to donate more .
9. Therefore it is not surprising , that if they increasingly support or neglect a policy , other countries may use that as a good excuse to not do anything -LRB- or provide very little support -RRB- to the Global Fund .
10. As we have seen in the example of the Kyoto protocol ; when the US did not sign the protocol this gave China , Russia , Japan , Australia and other countries a free pass to say that they feel no moral obligation , as the US , one of the biggest polluters does not participate in the agreement .

Claim:
Answer: An increase in funding will incentivize other countries to give more aid.