Question: CHAPTER XI. 

AUNT CATHARINE'S HOME. 

The lady sleeps--O may her sleep, As it is lasting, so be deep! Heaven have her in its sacred keep! This bed being changed for one more holy, This room for one more melancholy, Some tomb, that oft hath flung its black And wing-like panels fluttering back, Triumphant o'er the fluttering palls Of her grand family funerals. E. A. POE. 

The summer was nearly over, when, one morning at breakfast, Louis surprised his father by a sound, half consternation, half amusement, and handed him a note, containing these words:-- 

'DEAR F.,--There were three of us last night; there are five this morning. Isabel and the twins are doing well. Heaven knows what is to become of us! 

'Yours, J. F.' 

'What would you have?' said Lord Ormersfield, calmly. 'The poorer people are, the more children they have!' 

He went on with his own letters, while Louis laughed at the enunciation of this inverse ratio; and then took up the note again, to wonder at the tone of anxiety and distress, so unlike James. He went to call on Lady Conway, and was better satisfied to find that James had written in a lively strain to her, as if proud of his little daughters, and resolved not to be pitied. Of this he was in no danger from his sisters-in-law, who looked upon twin-girls as the only blessing needed to complete Isabel's felicity, had devised three dozen names for them, and longed to be invited to Northwold to see them.  What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. What is the lady doing?
2. Does sleep have another meaning in this story?
3. what?
4. Who wrote a letter?
5. Whatdo poor people have more of?
6. What did Louis give hi sfather?
7. a sound what?
8. What did the note talk about?
9. Who was born?
10. who gave birth?
11. Were they healthy?
12. How many were there before the babies were born?
13. were the babies girls?
14. did they come up with any names?
15. how many?
16. where did they live?
17. Who wished to be invited?
18. What was Louis doing when he surprised his father?
19. what did Louis laugh at?
20. of what?
Answer: 1. sleeping
2. yes
3. Death
4. Lord Ormersfield,
5. children
6. a sound
7. half consternation
8. A birth
9. twins
10. Isabel
11. yes
12. three
13. twin-girls
14. Yes
15. three dozen
16. Northwold
17. Lord Ormersfield
18. eating breakfast
19. the enunciation
20. this inverse ratio;

(CNN) -- A British theater producer who was briefly jailed in Uganda because of his play about the challenges facing gay people in the African nation said Wednesday the case against him had been dropped. 

Homosexual acts are illegal in Uganda, where most gays and lesbians face physical attacks and are treated as social outcasts. 

David Cecil told CNN he was in the Ugandan court when the magistrate dismissed the case. 

Read more: Uganda lawmakers to vote on anti-gay law 

Speaking by phone from Kampala, he said the magistrate told the court Cecil had complied with the investigation, and was clearly not afraid to face the charges. 

However, the magistrate said the prosecution failed to provide evidence to substantiate the charges, Cecil said. 

The charges themselves have not been dropped, Cecil added, but if the state wanted to reopen the case, the magistrate made clear it would have to start again from the beginning. 

Cecil said he was confident the state would not reopen the case. 

He said plans to stay in Uganda, where his family lives. 

Read more: Uganda bans 38 agencies it says are promoting gay rights 

Cecil was briefly jailed in September after he was arrested on charges of "disobedience of lawful orders" for staging the play without authorization. His lawyer, John Onyango, said then that Cecil could be imprisoned for two years, if convicted. 

The play, "The River and the Mountain," features an all-Ugandan cast, and tells the story of a gay businessman killed by his employees.  What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. Who was put in jail?
2. What was his name?
3. Who interviewed him?
4. Where was he arrested?
5. What happened to the case?
6. Have the charges gone away?
7. Can the case be reopened?
8. Was Cecil ever arrested before?
9. When was he arrested?
10. Who is his attorney?
Answer: 1. British theater producer who was briefly jailed  British Theater Producer
2. David Cecil told CNN he was in the Ugandan court when the magistrate dismissed the case.  David Cecil
3. David Cecil told CNN  CNN
4. jailed in Uganda   Uganda
5. the case against him had been dropped. Dropped
6. The charges themselves have not been dropped, Cecil added. No
7. Cecil said he was confident the state would not reopen the case.  Appears unlikely
8. Cecil was briefly jailed in September   Yes
9. Cecil was briefly jailed in September after he was arrested on charges of "disobedience of lawful orders" September
10. His lawyer, John Onyango.  John Onyango

New Delhi (CNN) -- An Indian court has ruled that the organizer of the scandal-plagued 2010 Commonwealth Games in New Delhi is forbidden from attending the opening ceremony of the London Olympics. 

The presence at the ceremony of Suresh Kalmadi, who was arrested last year on corruption charges related to the Commonwealth Games, would be "contrary to national interest," the High Court of Delhi said Wednesday. 

The legal action seeking to restrict Kalmadi's movements was filed after a different court had authorized him to travel to London. He had sought permission for the trip in order to attend meetings of the International Association of Athletics Federations. 

The Delhi high court allowed him to go ahead with his visit. But it said he couldn't leave India until Friday, the day of the opening ceremony, and should honor a pledge not to attend any Olympic events "in any official capacity." 

Kalmadi still holds a number of high-profile sports administrative roles, including the presidency of the Indian Olympic Association. 

In a statement, he said he was "never planning to attend" the opening ceremony and had never sought permission to do so. 

The petitioner who brought the litigation, Rahul Mehra, said Kalmadi's presence at the Olympics would be "extremely embarrassing" for the athletes and India. Mehra described himself as a "patriotic citizen of the country." 

The Indian government also is not in favor of Kalmadi attending the Olympics while he still faces corruption charges, according to the text of the high court's judgment. 

The 2010 Commonwealth Games, which India had hoped would burnish its image as a rising economic power, was marred by accusations of graft, missed construction deadlines and cost overruns.  What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. Did someone get banned?
2. Who?
3. From what?
4. Why?
5. Where were those held?
6. Was he incarcerated?
7. When?
8. For what?
9. Did he confirm he was going?
10. What did he say?
11. Who else offered an opinion on this?
12. Why not?
13. What did India hope?
14. Did that happen?
15. What actually happened?
Answer:
Answer: 1. Yes
2. Suresh Kalmadi
3. Attending the opening ceremony of the London Olympics
4. He was the organizer of the scandal-plagued 2010 Commonwealth Games
5. New Delhi
6. Yes
7. Last year
8. Corruption charges
9. No
10. He said he was never planning to attend
11. The Indian government
12. Because he still faces corruption charges
13. The 2010 Commonwealth Games would burnish its image as a rising economic power
14. No
15. It was  marred by accusations of graft, missed construction deadlines and cost overruns