Question: Sentences: 1. 1999 .
2. Trade , Income Disparity and Poverty .
3. DanBen-David , Hkan Nordstrm , LAlanWinters .
4. It is good for companies , because they have more resources and markets at their disposal , good for consumers , because competition between companies drives down prices and drives the innovation that improves products , and it is good for workers , because they have greater opportunities to find employment for their labour and skills .
5. This is good for all those involved in the transaction .
6. It leads to the sharing of innovation , drives down the cost of production , and allows workers to move freely where their labour and skills are needed .
7. This leads to competition between countries in those regions , and between companies and industries in those countries .
8. Free trade essentially removes barriers for companies to do business across countries and regions .
What claim can be made from these sentences?
Free trade is good for development and growth.

Sentences: 1. Shachtman , Noah , and Ackerman , Spencer , Exclusive : U.S. Sees Syria Prepping Chemical Weapons for Possible Attack , , 3 December 2012 , Rogin , Josh , Exclusive : Secret State Department cable : Chemical weapons used in Syria , , 15 January 2013 ,
2. If there is no response to the limited use of chemical weapons , such as the use of Agent 15 in Homs , then there the regime will be encouraged to think that there will be no response to larger uses of chemical weapons .
3. Syria would slowly escalate to see what it can get away with , an escalation that US officials think could lead to a mass-casualty event without the appropriate response .
4. It means that Physically , theyve gotten to the point where the can load it up on a plane and drop it .
5. If there is no response to this then Syria will be more likely to use weapons .
6. Not responding to Syrian moves to use chemical weapons will be enabling the Syrian government to use chemical weapons .
7. It has already been reported that some chemical weapons are being made ready for use such as the combining of the two chemical precursors , isopropanol and methylphosphony difluoride , needed to weaponize sarin gas .
What claim can be made from these sentences?
No reaction will embolden the regime

Sentences: 1. A federal Europe would build upon the success of the EU and its predecessors in taming the nationalism that caused so much conflict in the twentieth century .
2. The EU is drawing nearer to realising the vision of its founders for an ever-closer union .
3. Despite the EUs relative success in this regard , while national governments still exist they will regard policy-making within Europe as a competitive business , abusing vetoes and damaging the potential prosperity of all of Europes citizens .
4. Such is the case with Britain 's veto over the carbon tax , which the EU wants to implement - The British government is `` highly likely '' to block European Commission proposals for a carbon tax contained in a widely-circulated draft version of the Energy Taxation Directive , EU diplomatic sources said yesterday .
5. A federal European state can build on the shared history and culture of its members to further the common good , while accommodating regional differences .
What claim can be made from these sentences?

Answer: A federal Europe will benefit the citizens of its member states