SOFA Score in relation to Sepsis: Clinical Implications in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognostic Assessment

To analyze the clinical significance of the sequential organ failure assessment (sofa) score in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment of sepsis.Methods.140 patients with sepsis from january 2020 to january 2021 were selected as the observation group, and 40 healthy people were selected as the control group.The observation group was divided into mild group, severe group, and septic shock group by single blind grouping according to the condition of the disease, and they were also divided into survival group and death group according to the prognosis.Collect the fasting venous blood of the subjects in each group in the morning, compare the levels of total bilirubin (tbil), blood creatinine (cr), and platelet count (plt) in each group, and record and compare the patients’ respiratory system oxygen partial pressure/inhaled oxygen concentration (po2/fio2), acute physiology and chronic health scoring system ii (apache ii), sequential organ failure assessment (sofa) score, q-sofa score, and △sofa score; pearson analysis was used to analyze the correlation between sofa score and other indicators; multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the prognostic risk factors of patients with sepsis; receiver-operating characteristic curve (roc) was used to analyze the value of sofa score alone and in combination in the diagnosis, condition, and prognosis of sepsis.Results.There were significant differences in apache ii score, sofa score, q-sofa score map, po2/fio2, plt, gcs, tbil, and serum creatinine (scr) between the control group and the observation group ( p &lt; 0.05 ).There were significant differences in apache ii score, sofa score, q-sofa score, mean arterial pressure (map) po2/fio2, plt, glasgow coma score (gcs), tbil, scr, and △sofa score among patients in mild, severe, and septic shock groups ( p &lt; 0.05 ).There were significant differences in age, apache ii score, sofa score, q-sofa score, map, po2/fio2, plt, gcs, tbil, scr, and △sofa score between survival group and death group ( p &lt; 0.05 ).Sofa score and q-sofa score were significantly positively correlated with tbil and scr and significantly negatively correlated with po2/fio2 and plt; △sofa score was significantly negatively correlated with tbil and scr and significantly positively correlated with map, po2/fio2, plt, and gcs.Apache ii score, sofa score, and q-sofa score were independent risk factors for sepsis patients, and △sofa score, po2/fio2, and gcs score were protective factors ( p &lt; 0.05 ).Roc curve analysis showed that the auc of sepsis combined with sofa score and q-sofa score was 0.880; the auc of sepsis assessed by sofa score, q-sofa score, and △sofa score was 0.929; the auc of sepsis prognosis assessed by sofa score, q-sofa score, and △sofa score was 0.900.Conclusion.Sofa score, q-sofa score, and △sofa score were abnormally expressed in patients with sepsis and were risk factors for the severity of the patient’s condition and prognosis.The sofa score, q-sofa score, and △sofa score were risk factors for the severity and prognosis of patients with sepsis and had some value in diagnosing sepsis and assessing the condition and prognosis, of which the combined value of the three was higher.

Journal: Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine (2022)
Publication types: Research Article;