Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery vs Community Weight Management Intervention for the Treatment of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance idiopathic intracranial hypertension (iih) causes headaches, vision loss, and reduced quality of life.Sustained weight loss among patients with iih is necessary to modify the disease and prevent relapse.Objective to compare the effectiveness of bariatric surgery with that of a community weight management (cwm) intervention for the treatment of patients with active iih.Design, setting, and participants this 5-year randomized clinical trial (idiopathic intracranial hypertension weight trial) enrolled women with active iih and a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 35 or higher at 5 national health service hospitals in the uk between march 1, 2014, and may 25, 2017.Of 74 women assessed for eligibility, 6 did not meet study criteria and 2 declined to participate; 66 women were randomized.Data were analyzed from november 1, 2018, to may 14, 2020.Interventions bariatric surgery (n = 33) or cwm intervention (weight watchers) (n = 33).Main outcomes and measures the primary outcome was change in intracranial pressure measured by lumbar puncture opening pressure at 12 months, as assessed in an intention-to-treat analysis.Secondary outcomes included lumbar puncture opening pressure at 24 months as well as visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, perimetric mean deviation, and quality of life (measured by the 36-item short form health survey) at 12 and 24 months.Because the difference in continuous outcomes between groups is presented, the null effect was at 0.Results of the 66 female participants (mean [sd] age, 32.0 [7.8] years), 64 (97.0%) remained in the clinical trial at 12 months and 54 women (81.8%) were included in the primary outcome analysis.Intracranial pressure was significantly lower in the bariatric surgery arm at 12 months (adjusted mean [se] difference, -6.0 [1.8] cm cerebrospinal fluid [csf]; 95% ci, -9.5 to -2.4 cm csf; p = .001) and at 24 months (adjusted mean [se] difference, -8.2 [2.0] cm csf; 95% ci, -12.2 to -4.2 cm csf; p < .001) compared with the cwm arm.In the per protocol analysis, intracranial pressure was significantly lower in the bariatric surgery arm at 12 months (adjusted mean [se] difference, -7.2 [1.8] cm csf; 95% ci, -10.6 to -3.7 cm csf; p < .001) and at 24 months (adjusted mean [se] difference, -8.7 [2.0] cm csf; 95% ci, -12.7 to -4.8 cm csf; p < .001).Weight was significantly lower in the bariatric surgery arm at 12 months (adjusted mean [se] difference, -21.4 [5.4] kg; 95% ci, -32.1 to -10.7 kg; p < .001) and at 24 months (adjusted mean [se] difference, -26.6 [5.6] kg; 95% ci, -37.5 to -15.7 kg; p < .001).Quality of life was significantly improved at 12 months (adjusted mean [se] difference, 7.3 [3.6]; 95% ci, 0.2-14.4; p = .04) and 24 months (adjusted mean [se] difference, 10.4 [3.8]; 95% ci, 3.0-17.9; p = .006) in the bariatric surgery arm.Conclusions and relevance in this randomized clinical trial, bariatric surgery was superior to a cwm intervention in lowering intracranial pressure.The continued improvement over the course of 2 years shows the impact of this intervention with regard to sustained disease remission.Trial registration clinical trials.gov identifier: nct02124486.

Journal: JAMA neurology (2021)
Publication types: Journal Article;Multicenter Study;Randomized Controlled Trial;Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't