Document ID: /roh_data/filtered/swiss_laws_in_ROHinterleaved.jsonl.gz/33395

This text was translated from EN into Rumantsch Grischun.

(Art. 24 VPETA) The cantonal authorities shall refuse to issue VET accreditation or shall revoke already issued VET accreditation if the workplace training proves unsatisfactory, if workplace trainers fail to adhere to legal requirements or if they fail to fulfil their obligations. If there is a risk that a learner will be unable to complete a VET programme, the cantonal authorities shall discuss the matter with the people involved and take such steps as are needed to ensure that the learner is able to undergo vocational education and training in accordance with his or her skills and aptitudes. If necessary, the cantonal authorities shall recommend that contracting parties revise the apprenticeship contract, or shall help the learner to transfer to another VET programme or learning location.

(art. 24 LFPr) L’autoritad chantunala refusa u revochescha la permissiun per la furmaziun, sche la furmaziun pratica professiunala è insuffizienta, sche furmaturs professiunals n’adempleschan betg las premissas legalas u violeschan lur obligaziun. Sch’il success da la furmaziun fundamentala è mess en dumonda, prenda l’autoritad chantunala – suenter avair tadlà las persunas participadas – las mesiras necessarias per intermediar a l’emprendist sche pussaivel ina furmaziun fundamentala che correspunda a sias abilitads ed a sias inclinaziuns. En cas da basegn recumonda l’autoritad chantunala a las parts contrahentas d’adattar il contract d’emprendissadi, u gida l’emprendist a tschertgar in’autra furmaziun fundamentala professiunala u in auter lieu da furmaziun.