Document ID: /roh_data/filtered/swiss_laws_in_ROHinterleaved.jsonl.gz/19342

This text was translated from EN into Rumantsch Grischun.

A party may request the court that has decided as final instance to review the final decision if:a. the party subsequently discovers significant facts or decisive evidence that could not have been submitted in the earlier proceedings, excluding facts and evidence that arose after the decision;b. criminal proceedings have established that the decision was influenced to the detriment of the party concerned by a felony or misdemeanour, even if no one has been convicted by the criminal court; if criminal proceedings are not possible, proof may be provided in some other manner;c. it is claimed that the acceptance, withdrawal or settlement of the claim is invalid. A review on the grounds of a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights of 4 November 1950 (ECHR) may be requested if:a. the European Court of Human Rights has determined in a final judgment (Art. 44 ECHR) that the ECHR or its protocols have been violated, or the case has been concluded by means of a friendly settlement (Art. 39 ECHR);b. compensation is not an appropriate remedy for the effects of the violation; andc. the review is necessary to remedy the violation. SR 0.101 Amended by Annex No 2 of the FA of 1 Oct. 2021, in force since 1 July 2022  (AS 2022 289; BBl 2021 300, 889).

Ina partida po pretender ina revisiun da la decisiun legalmain valaivla davant la dretgira che ha decidì sco ultima instanza en chaussa, sche:a. ella scuvra posteriuramain fatgs relevants u chatta meds da cumprova decisivs ch’ella n’ha betg pudì preschentar en la procedura precedenta; exclus èn fatgs e meds da cumprova ch’èn resultads pir suenter la decisiun;b. ina procedura penala ha mussà che la decisiun era vegnida influenzada tras in crim u tras in delict a disfavur da la partida respectiva; ina condemnaziun tras la dretgira penala n’è betg necessaria; sche la procedura penala na po betg vegnir realisada, po la cumprova vegnir procurada en autra moda;c. i vegn fatg valair che la renconuschientscha dal plant, la retratga dal plant u l’accord giudizial n’hajan betg effect. La revisiun pervia d’ina violaziun da la Convenziun europeica dals dretgs umans dals 4 da november 1950 (CEDU) po vegnir pretendida, sche:a. il Tribunal europeic dals dretgs umans ha constatà en ina sentenzia definitiva (art. 44 CEDU) che la CEDU u ils protocols latiers sajan vegnids violads, u ha terminà il cas tras ina cunvegna amicabla (art. 39 CEDU);b. ina indemnisaziun n’è betg adattada per egualisar las consequenzas da la violaziun; ec. la revisiun è necessaria per eliminar la violaziun. SR 0.101 Versiun tenor la cifra 2 da l’agiunta da la LF dal 1. d’oct. 2021, en vigur dapi il 1. da fan. 2022 (AS 2022 289; BBl 2021 300, 889).